XML 23 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Note A - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2019
Notes to Financial Statements  
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
A.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements and information included in this Annual Report on Form
10
-K (“Form
10
-K”) include the financial results of Veth Propulsion Holding B.V. (“Veth Propulsion”) for the period beginning
July 2, 2018
through
June 30, 2019.
The financial results included in this Form
10
-K related to the acquisition method accounting for the Veth Propulsion acquisition have been finalized. See Note B, Acquisition of Veth Propulsion Holding B.V., for further information about the acquisition and related transactions and the acquisition accounting.
 
Significant Accounting Policies
 
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of these financial statements:
 
Consolidation Principles
--The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Twin Disc, Incorporated and its wholly and majority-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries (the “Company”). Certain foreign subsidiaries are included based on fiscal years ending
May 31,
to facilitate prompt reporting of consolidated accounts. The Company also has a controlling interest in a Japanese joint venture, which is consolidated based upon a fiscal year ending
March 31.
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
 
Management Estimates--
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.
 
Translation of Foreign Currencies
--The financial statements of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated using the current exchange rate for assets and liabilities and the weighted-average exchange rate for the year for revenues and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is included in equity. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in earnings. Included in other income (expense) are foreign currency transaction losses of (
$681
) and (
$198
) in fiscal
2019
and
2018,
respectively.
 
Cash
--The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of
three
months or less to be cash equivalent. Under the Company’s cash management system, cash balances at certain banks are funded when checks are presented for payment. To the extent that checks issued, but
not
yet presented for payment, exceed the balance on hand at the specific bank against which they were written, the amount of those un-presented checks is included in accounts payable.
 
Accounts
Receivable
--These represent trade accounts receivable and are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,582
and
$1,478
at
June 30, 2019
and
2018,
respectively. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts for certain customers where a risk of default has been specifically identified as well as provisions determined on a general basis when it is believed that some default is probable and estimable. The assessment of likelihood of customer default is based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, the historical collection experience and existing economic conditions. Various factors
may
adversely impact its customer’s ability to access sufficient liquidity and capital to fund their operations and render the Company’s estimation of customer defaults inherently uncertain. While the Company believes current allowances for doubtful accounts are adequate, it is possible that these factors
may
cause higher levels of customer defaults and bad debt expense in future periods.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
--The carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, trade accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the immediate short-term maturity of these financial instruments
.
If measured at fair value, cash would be classified as Level
1
and all other items listed above would be classified as Level
2
in the fair value hierarchy, as defined in Note O, Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans. The Company’s borrowings under the revolving loan agreement, which is classified as long-term debt and consists of loans that are routinely borrowed and repaid throughout the year, approximate fair value at
June 30, 2019.
The Company’s term loan borrowing, which is LIBOR-based, approximates fair value at
June 30, 2019.
If measured at fair value in the financial statements, long-term debt (including any current portion) would be classified as Level
2
in the fair value hierarchy.
 
Derivative Financial Instruments
-
-
The Company has written policies and procedures that place all financial instruments under the direction of the Company’s corporate treasury department and restrict all derivative transactions to those intended for hedging purposes. The use of financial instruments for trading purposes is prohibited. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage certain financial risks. The Company enters into forward contracts to reduce the earnings and cash flow impact of non-functional currency denominated receivables and payables. The Company uses interest rate swap contracts to reduce the exposure to variability in interest rates on floating debt borrowings. The Company designates certain financial instruments as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. See Note T, Derivative Financial Instruments, for additional information.
 
Inventories
--Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost has been determined by the last-in,
first
-out (LIFO) method for the majority of inventories located in the United States, and by the
first
-in,
first
-out (FIFO) method for all other inventories. Management specifically identifies obsolete products and analyzes historical usage, forecasted production based on future orders, demand forecasts, and economic trends, among others, when evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory.
 
Property, Plant and Equipment and Depreciation
--Assets are stated at cost. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are charged against earnings as incurred. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments are capitalized and depreciated. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The lives assigned to buildings and related improvements range from
10
to
40
years, and the lives assigned to machinery and equipment range from
5
to
15
years. Upon disposal of property, plant and equipment, the cost of the asset and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in earnings. Fully depreciated assets are
not
removed from the accounts until physically disposed.
 
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
--The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets
may
not
be fully recoverable. For property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets, excluding indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company performs undiscounted operating cash flow analyses to determine if an impairment exists. If an impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. Fair value is primarily determined using discounted cash flow analyses; however, other methods
may
be used to determine the fair value, including
third
party valuations when necessary.
 
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
--Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, primarily tradenames, are tested for impairment at least annually during the Company’s
fourth
fiscal quarter and more frequently if an event occurs which indicates the asset
may
be impaired. If applicable, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets
not
subject to amortization have been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing based upon the relative fair value of the asset to each reporting unit.
 
A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators
may
include, among others: a significant decline in expected future cash flows; a sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization; a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate; unanticipated competition; the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit; and slower growth rates. Any adverse change in these factors could have a significant impact on the recoverability of these assets and could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Goodwill impairment charges are recorded using a simplified
one
-step approach. The fair value of a reporting unit, as defined, is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill. The fair value is primarily determined using discounted cash flow analyses which is driven by projected growth rates, and which applies an appropriate market-participant discount rate; the fair value determined is also compared to the value obtained using a market approach from guideline public company multiples. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, that difference is recognized as an impairment loss.
 
In fiscal
2018
and prior years, the annual testing date was the last day of the fiscal year. In fiscal
2019,
the Company changed its annual testing date to the
first
day of the Company’s
fourth
fiscal quarter in order to provide the Company more time and better information to perform the analyses. The Company does
not
believe that this change constitutes a material change to the method in applying an accounting principle.
 
The Company conducted interim qualitative assessments throughout the year, and its annual assessment for goodwill impairment as of
March 30, 2019
and
June 30, 2018
using updated inputs, including appropriate risk-based, country and company specific weighted average discount rates for the Company’s reporting units.
 
The fair value of the Company’s other intangible assets with indefinite lives, primarily tradenames, is estimated using the relief-from-royalty method, which requires assumptions related to projected revenues; assumed royalty rates that could be payable if the Company did
not
own the asset; and a discount rate. The Company completed the impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles as of
June 30, 2019
and concluded there were
no
impairments.
 
Changes in circumstances, existing at the measurement date or at other times in the future, or in the numerous estimates associated with management’s judgments, assumptions and estimates made in assessing the fair value of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles, could result in an impairment charge in the future. The Company will continue to monitor all significant estimates and impairment indicators, and will perform interim impairment reviews as necessary.
 
Any cost incurred to extend or renew the term of an indefinite lived intangible asset are expensed as incurred.
 
Income
Taxes
--The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided for deferred tax assets where it is considered more likely than
not
that the Company will
not
realize the benefit of such assets. The Company evaluates its uncertain tax positions as new information becomes available. Tax benefits are recognized to the extent a position is more likely than
not
to be sustained upon examination by the taxing authority.
 
Revenue Recognition
--Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized using a
five
-step model consisting of the following: (
1
) identify the contract with a customer; (
2
) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (
3
) determine the transaction price; (
4
) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (
5
) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. Performance obligations are satisfied when the Company transfers control of a good or service to a customer, which can occur over time or at a point in time. The amount of revenue recognized is based on the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services, including the expected value of variable consideration. The customer’s ability and intent to pay the transaction price is assessed in determining whether a contract exists with the customer. If collectibility of substantially all of the consideration in a contract is
not
probable, consideration received is
not
recognized as revenue unless the consideration is nonrefundable and the Company
no
longer has an obligation to transfer additional goods or services to the customer or collectibility becomes probable.
 
Goods sold to
third
party distributors are subject to an annual return policy, for which a provision is made at the time of shipment based upon historical experience.
 
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs
--The Company records revenue from shipping and handling costs in net sales. The cost associated with shipping and handling of products is reflected in cost of goods sold.
  
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
 
 
a.
In
May 2014,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updated guidance (ASU
2014
-
09
) on revenue from contracts with customers. This revenue recognition guidance supersedes existing guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control over promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance identifies steps to apply in achieving this principle. The Company adopted this guidance effective
July 1, 2018,
using the modified retrospective method. Prior periods presented were
not
retrospectively adjusted for this change. The Company has applied the new revenue recognition standard only to contracts that were
not
completed as of
July 1, 2018.
 
The Company determined that deferral of revenue is appropriate for certain agreements where the performance of services after product delivery is required. Such services primarily pertain to technical commissioning services by its entities in its marine and propulsion business, whereby the Company’s technicians calibrate the controls and transmission to ensure proper performance for the customer’s specific application. This service helps identify issues with the ship's design or performance that need to be remediated by the ship builder or other component suppliers prior to the ship being officially accepted into service by the ship buyer. The cumulative effect adjustment of adopting the new standard is
not
significant to the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
 
 
b.
In
February 2016,
the FASB issued guidance (ASU
2016
-
02
) which replaces the existing guidance for leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than
12
months. The Company elected to early adopt the standard effective
July 1, 2018
concurrent with the adoption of ASU
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, which required the Company to restate each prior reporting period presented.
 
For operating leases in which the Company is a lessee, the Company concluded that all existing operating leases under the old guidance continue to be classified as operating leases under the new guidance, and all existing capital leases under the old guidance are classified as finance leases under the new guidance. The Company excluded any lease contracts with terms of
twelve
months or less as of the adoption date. The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for as separate lease components. The Company accounts for short-term leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
 
The following table presents the effect of the adoption of ASU
2016
-
02
on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2018:
 
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
 
Adoption
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
 
 
As Reported
 
 
Impact
 
 
Restated
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
 
$
48,940
 
 
$
6,527
 
 
$
55,467
 
Lease obligations
 
 
-
 
 
 
6,527
 
 
 
6,527
 
 
The adoption of ASU
2014
-
09
and ASU
2016
-
02
did
not
have an impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income or consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended
June 30, 2018.
 
 
c.
In
March 2017,
the FASB issued guidance (ASU
2017
-
07
) intended to improve the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement cost. This guidance requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statement of operations separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of income from operations. The Company adopted this guidance effective
July 1, 2018
on a retrospective basis, which resulted in the reclassification of certain amounts from cost of goods sold and marketing, engineering and administrative expenses to other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. As a result, prior period amounts impacted have been revised accordingly. There was
no
impact to net income.
 
The following table presents the effect of the adoption of ASU
2017
-
07
on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended
June 30, 2018:
 
 
 
For the Year Ended
 
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
 
Adoption
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
 
 
As Reported
 
 
Impact
 
 
Restated
 
Cost of goods sold
 
$
160,497
 
 
$
(405
)
 
$
160,092
 
Gross profit
 
 
80,236
 
 
 
405
 
 
 
80,641
 
Marketing, engineering and administrative expenses
 
 
61,909
 
 
 
(814
)
 
 
61,095
 
Income from operations
 
 
14,929
 
 
 
1,219
 
 
 
16,148
 
Other income (expense), net
 
 
(282
)
 
 
(1,219
)
 
 
(1,501
)
 
 
d.
In
February 2018,
the FASB issued guidance (ASU
2018
-
02
) intended to eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by allowing a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The Company elected to early adopt this guidance effective
July 1, 2018
by making a reclassification of
$6,903
from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings.
 
 
e.
In
October 2016,
the FASB issued updated guidance (ASU
2016
-
16
) that changes the recognition of income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The Company adopted this guidance effective
July 1, 2018.
The adoption of this guidance did
not
have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.
 
 
f.
In
August 2016,
the FASB issued updated guidance (ASU
2016
-
15
) that addresses
eight
specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The Company adopted this guidance effective
July 1, 2018.
The adoption of this guidance did
not
have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.
 
 
g.
In
August 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
2017
-
12,
Derivatives and Hedging (ASC
815
) - Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments in this guidance better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. The Company elected to early adopt this standard during the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2019.
The adoption of this guidance did
not
have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.
 
 
h.
In
August 2018,
the SEC issued Release
No.
33
-
10532,
Disclosure Update and Simplification. In addition to eliminating certain disclosure requirements, this release also amends the interim financial statement requirements to require provision of the information required by Regulation S-
X
Rule
3
-
04
for the current and comparative year-to-date periods, with subtotals for each interim period. Rule
3
-
04
requires a reconciliation of stockholders’ equity beginning and ending balances for each period for which a statement of comprehensive income is required to be filed. The Company adopted this guidance during the Company’s
second
quarter of fiscal year
2019.
The adoption of this guidance did
not
have a material impact on the Company’s disclosures.
 
New Accounting Releases
 
 
a.
In
June 2018,
the FASB issued guidance (ASU
2018
-
07
) intended to simplify the accounting for share based payments granted to nonemployees. Under the amendments in this guidance, payments to nonemployees would be aligned with the requirements for share based payments granted to employees. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2018, (
the Company’s fiscal
2020
), including interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.
 
 
b.
In
August 2018,
the FASB issued updated guidance (ASU
2018
-
13
) as part of the disclosure framework project, which focuses on improving the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to the financial statements. The amendments in this update modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic
820,
Fair Value Measurement. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2019 (
the Company’s fiscal
2021
), with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s disclosures.
 
 
c.
In
August 2018,
the FASB issued updated guidance (ASU
2018
-
14
) intended to modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined pension or postretirement plans. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2020 (
the Company’s fiscal
2021
), with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s disclosures.
 
Special Note Regarding Smaller Reporting Company Status
 
In
June 2018,
the SEC issued Release
33
-
10513;
34
-
83550,
Amendments to Smaller Reporting Company Definition, which changed the definition of a smaller reporting company in Rule
12b
-
2
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,
as amended. Under this release, the new thresholds for qualifying are (
1
) public float of less than
$250
million or (
2
) annual revenue of less than
$100
million and public float of less than
$700
million (including
no
public float). The rule change was effective on
September 10, 2018,
the Company’s
first
fiscal quarter of fiscal year
2019.
The Company continues to qualify as a smaller reporting company based on its public float as of the last business day of its
second
fiscal quarter of fiscal year
2019.
A smaller reporting company
may
choose to comply with scaled or non-scaled financial and non-financial disclosure requirements on an item-by-item basis. The Company has scaled some of its disclosures of financial and non-financial information in this annual report. The Company
may
determine to provide scaled disclosures of financial or non-financial information in future quarterly reports, annual reports and/or proxy statements if it remains a smaller reporting company under SEC rules.