10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from           to           .

Commission file number: 000-26887

Silicon Image, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	77-0396307
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1060 East Arques Avenue
Sunnyvale, California 94085
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(408) 616-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer þ      Accelerated Filer o      Non-Accelerated o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

     As of July 31, 2007, there were 85,239,842 shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

Silicon Image, Inc.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2007

Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information	3
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006	5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	29
Part II. Other Information	30
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	30
Item 1A. Risk Factors	31
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	48
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	48
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	49
Item 5. Other Information	50
Item 6. Exhibits	50
Signatures	51
EXHIBIT 10.01
EXHIBIT 10.02
EXHIBIT 10.03
EXHIBIT 31.01
EXHIBIT 31.02
EXHIBIT 32.01
EXHIBIT 32.02

2

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Silicon Image, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	79,561		$	81,921
Short-term investments		123,351			168,724
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $1,779 in 2007 and $235 in 2006		45,701			39,931
Inventories, net		22,781			28,287
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		15,512			4,895
Deferred income taxes		10,156			12,793
Total current assets		297,062			336,551
Property and equipment, net		24,575			18,431
Goodwill		19,210			13,021
Intangible assets, net		2,066			78
Deferred income taxes, non-current		14,490			10,580
Other assets		15,915			1,570
Total assets	$	373,318		$	380,231
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	23,029		$	14,187
Accrued liabilities		21,492			37,308
Deferred license revenue		4,461			5,264
Deferred margin on sales to distributors		19,087			17,712
Total current liabilities		68,069			74,471
Other long-term liabilities		9,574			538
Total liabilities		77,643			75,009
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 7)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock		90			87
Treasury stock		(31,140	)		—
Additional paid-in capital		405,236			386,258
Accumulated deficit		(78,365	)		(80,964	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(146	)		(159	)
Total stockholders’ equity		295,675			305,222
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	373,318		$	380,231

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Silicon Image, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Revenue:
Product	$	65,875	$	61,667	$	121,541	$	114,947
Development, licensing and royalties		13,896		8,912		27,349		14,731
Total revenue		79,771		70,579		148,890		129,678
Cost of revenue and operating expenses:
Cost of revenue (1)		36,938		29,785		67,696		55,133
Research and development (2)		19,025		15,179		36,220		30,745
Selling, general and administrative (3)		17,151		16,563		34,295		32,025
Amortization of intangible assets		537		78		1,152		351
Total cost of revenue and operating expenses		73,651		61,605		139,363		118,254
Income from operations		6,120		8,974		9,527		11,424
Interest income and other, net		3,290		2,020		6,316		3,558
Income before provision for income taxes		9,410		10,994		15,843		14,982
Provision for income taxes		5,038		5,196		8,555		6,832
Net income	$	4,372	$	5,798	$	7,288	$	8,150
Net income per share – basic	$	0.05	$	0.07	$	0.08	$	0.10
Net income per share – diluted	$	0.05	$	0.07	$	0.08	$	0.10
Weighted average shares – basic		86,737		81,562		86,781		81,019
Weighted average shares – diluted		88,817		85,628		89,156		85,246

(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense	$	443	$	554	$	789	$	1,182
(2) Includes stock-based compensation expense		2,056		2,800		4,364		5,612
(3) Includes stock-based compensation expense		2,687		3,197		4,065		7,040

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Silicon Image, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	7,288		$	8,150
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		5,027			3,217
Amortization of intangible assets		1,152			351
Provision for doubtful accounts		1,544			37
Stock-based compensation expense		9,218			13,834
Income tax benefit (deficiency) from employee based compensation plans		84			—
Excess tax benefit from employee stock transactions		(1,345	)		(7,289	)
Accretion of investment discount		(164	)		(7	)
Realized gain on investments		(17	)		—
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		695			10
Deferred income taxes		637			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(3,639	)		(8,115	)
Inventories		5,697			(1,872	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(9,673	)		488
Accounts payable		5,980			79
Accrued liabilities and deferred license revenue		(19,779	)		8,262
Deferred margin on sales to distributors		1,375			3,124
Cash provided by operating activities		4,080			20,269
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments		64,346			28,771
Purchases of short-term investments		(18,657	)		(99,858	)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired		(13,751	)		—
Purchases of property and equipment		(7,609	)		(3,059	)
Purchase of intellectual property		(10,000	)		—
Release of restriction on cash received in conjunction with Genesis litigation		—			6,966
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities		14,329			(67,180	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuances of common stock, net		9,679			6,395
Excess tax benefits from employee stock transactions		1,345			7,289
Repayments of debt and capital lease obligations		—			(113	)
Payment for financing in connection with purchase of software		(528	)		—
Payments to acquire treasury stock		(31,140	)		—
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(20,644	)		13,571
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(125	)		—
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(2,360	)		(33,340	)
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		81,921			77,877
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	79,561		$	44,537
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash payment for interest	$	33		$	7
Cash payment for income taxes		25,576			450
Unrealized net gain on investment security		135			10
Property and equipment purchased but not paid for		2,674			2,537

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Silicon Image, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2007

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

     In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Silicon Image, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “Silicon Image”, “we” or “our”) included herein have been prepared on a basis consistent with our December 31, 2006 audited financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the condensed consolidated balance sheets of Silicon Image and our subsidiaries as of June 30, 2007, the related consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of future operating results to be expected for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board released FASB 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. We are currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements.

     In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 48-1 Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FSP FIN 48-1). FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP FIN 48-1 is effective retroactively from January 1, 2007. The implementation of this standard does not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

3. Stock-Based Compensation

  1995 Equity Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”)

     In September 1995, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”), which provides for the granting of incentive stock options (“ISOs”) and non-qualified stock options (“NSOs”) to employees, directors and consultants. In accordance with the 1995 Plan, the stated exercise price shall not be less than 100% and 85% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant for ISOs and NSOs, respectively. In September 1998, the 1995 Plan was amended to allow ISOs to be exercised prior to vesting. We have the right to repurchase shares acquired upon the early exercise of options at their original purchase price if the optionee’s employment with the Company is terminated prior to the shares vesting. Once the shares vest, the Company’s repurchase right expires.

  1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the “1999 Plan”)

     In October 1999, the 1999 Plan became the successor to the 1995 Plan and was amended to prohibit early exercise of stock options. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1999 Plan increases automatically on January 1 of each year by an amount equal to 5% of our total common shares outstanding as of the immediately preceding December 31st. The 1999 Plan terminates in July 2009.

     In June and July 2001, in connection with the CMD Technology, Inc., (“CMD”) and Silicon Communication Lab (“SCL”) acquisitions, we assumed all outstanding options and options available for issuance under the CMD 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and SCL 1999 Stock Option Plan. In April 2004, in connection with the TransWarp acquisition, we assumed all outstanding options and options available for issuance under the TransWarp Stock Option Plan. The terms of these Plans are very similar to those of the 1999

6

Plan. Our assumption of the CMD, SCL and TransWarp Plans and the outstanding options thereunder did not require the approval of, and was not approved by, our stockholders.

     Options granted under our stock option plans are exercisable over periods not to exceed ten years and vest over periods ranging from one to five years and generally vest annually as to 25% of the shares subject to the options. Stock option grants to members of our Board of Directors vest monthly, over periods not to exceed four years. Some options provide for accelerated vesting if certain identified milestones are achieved, upon a termination of employment or upon a change in control of the Company.

     Under our stock option plans, 8.4 million shares of common stock remain available for issuance.

  Non-plan options

     In 2004 and 2003, our Board of Directors granted non-plan options to purchase 1.7 million and 625,000 shares, respectively, of our common stock to three executives and an employee. There were no non-plan option grants in 2005 and 2006. All non-plan options were granted with exercise prices equal to the fair market value on the date of grant and with vesting periods ranging from four to five years, and expire in ten years. No non-plan options were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2007.

  1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)

     Our ESPP provides that eligible employees may contribute up to 15% of their eligible earnings to purchase shares at the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the commencement date of the six-month offering period or on the last day of the six-month offering period. At June 30, 2007, there were 2.3 million shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under the ESPP.

SFAS No. 123(R)

     Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), requiring us to recognize expense related to the fair value of our stock-based compensation awards. We elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123(R) and therefore have not restated our financial results for prior periods. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 includes compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123”) Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, as adjusted for estimated forfeitures. Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 was based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). Under SFAS No. 123(R), our ESPP is considered a compensatory plan and we are required to recognize compensation cost for grants made under ESPP. We recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis for all share-based payment awards over the respective requisite service period of the awards.

Determining Fair Value

     Valuation and amortization method—We estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and a single option award approach. This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period.

     Expected Term—The expected term represents the period that our stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior as influenced by changes to the terms of its stock-based awards.

     Expected Volatility—Our computation of expected volatility is based on historical volatility.

     Risk-Free Interest Rate—The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option valuation method is based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issue with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option.

     Expected Dividend—The dividend yield reflects that we have not paid any dividends and have no intention to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

7

     In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we reassessed the valuation technique and related assumptions. We estimate the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes option valuation model, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 and our prior period pro forma disclosures of net earnings, including stock-based compensation (determined under a fair value method as prescribed by SFAS No. 123). The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the straight-line attribution approach with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Employee stock option plans:
Expected life in years		4.9			5.0			4.9			5.0
Expected volatility		70	%		85	%		74	%		89	%
Risk-free interest rate		4.8	%		5.0	%		4.7	%		4.7	%
Expected dividends	none			none			none			none
Weighted average fair value	$	5.10		$	7.05		$	6.09		$	7.25
Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
Expected life in years		0.5			1.3			0.5			1.3
Expected volatility		51	%		57	%		51	%		57	%
Risk-free interest rate		5.2	%		4.7	%		5.2	%		4.7	%
Expected dividends	none			none			none			none
Weighted average fair value	$	3.62		$	4.75		$	3.62		$	4.75

     The expected stock price volatility assumption was determined using the historical volatility of our common stock.

     Change in forfeiture rate- For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company used a 10.84% estimated forfeiture rate which we believe is indicative of the rate it will experience during the remaining vesting period of currently outstanding unvested options.

Stock-based Compensation Expense

     The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006			June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
Cost of sales	$	443			554		$	789		$	1,182
Research and development		2,056			2,800			4,364			5,612
Selling, general and administrative		2,687			3,197			4,065			7,040
Income tax effect		(1,558	)		(2,666	)		(2,804	)		(5,630	)
	$	3,628		$	3,885		$	6,414		$	8,204

     As required by SFAS No. 123(R), management made an estimate of expected forfeitures and is recognizing stock-based compensation expense only for those equity awards expected to vest.

     At June 30, 2007, the total stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock-based awards granted to employees under the stock option plans but not yet recognized was approximately $49.5 million, after estimated forfeitures. This cost will generally be recognized on a straight-line basis over an estimated weighted-average period of approximately 1.8 years and will be adjusted if necessary, in subsequent periods, if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

8

     At June 30, 2007, the total stock-based compensation expense related to options to purchase common shares under the ESPP but not yet recognized was approximately $114,000. This cost will be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.1 years.

Stock Options and Awards Activity

     The following is a summary of option activity for our Stock Option Plans (in thousands, except per share amounts):

						Weighted Average
	Number of			Weighted Average		Remaining Contractual		Aggregate
	Shares			Exercise Price		Term in Years		Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		16,254		$	8.95		6.80		$69,956
Granted		2,774			9.77
Exercised		(1,892	)		4.12
Forfeitures and cancellations		(1,523	)		10.78
Outstanding at June 30, 2007		15,613		$	9.51		7.05		$19,108
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2007		14,644		$	9.45		6.94		$18,976
Exercisable at June 30, 2007		8,637		$	8.79		5.91		$17,350

     The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of our common stock that were in-the-money at June 30, 2007. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under our stock option plans was $5.4 million and $7.9 million, determined as of the date of option exercises during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

4. Comprehensive income

     The components of comprehensive income, net of related taxes, were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006		2007			2006
Net income	$	4,372		$	5,798	$	7,288		$	8,150
Change in unrealized value of investments		20			145		135			10
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(114	)		—		(125	)		—
Total comprehensive income	$	4,278		$	5,943	$	7,298		$	8,160

9

5. Net Income Per Share

     Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding shares subject to repurchase, and diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and diluted equivalents outstanding during the period, if any, determined using the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Net income	$	4,372	$	5,798	$	7,288	$	8,150
Weighted average shares – basic		86,737		81,562		86,781		81,019
Weighted average shares – diluted		88,817		85,628		89,156		85,246
Net income per share – basic	$	0.05	$	0.07	$	0.08	$	0.10
Net income per share – diluted	$	0.05	$	0.07	$	0.08	$	0.10

     The following is a reconciliation of the weighted-average common shares used to calculate basic net income per share to the weighted-average common shares used to calculate diluted net income per share (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Weighted-average common shares for basic net income per share		86,737		81,562		86,781		81,019
Weighted-average dilutive stock options outstanding under the treasury stock method		2,080		4,066		2,375		4,227
Weighted-average common shares for diluted net income per share		88,817		85,628		89,156		85,246

10

6. Balance Sheet Components

	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(in thousands)
Inventories:
Raw materials	$	4,130		$	7,908
Work in process		4,073			2,712
Finished goods		14,578			17,667
Total inventories	$	22,781		$	28,287
Property and equipment
Computers and software	$	26,894		$	22,432
Equipment		25,859			25,836
Furniture and fixtures		5,039			3,068
		57,792			51,336
Less: accumulated depreciation		(33,217	)		(32,905	)
Total property and equipment, net	$	24,575		$	18,431
Accrued liabilities:
Accrued payroll and related expenses	$	5,969		$	4,921
Accrued legal fees		979			1,022
Warranty accrual		65			60
Bonus accrual		50			8,718
Accrued income taxes		—			12,683
Other accrued liabilities		14,429			9,904
Total accrued liabilities	$	21,492		$	37,308

     At the time of revenue recognition, we provide an accrual for estimated costs to be incurred pursuant to our warranty obligation. Our estimate is based primarily on historical experience. Warranty accrual activity was as follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
Balance at January 1	$	60		$	382
Provision for warranties issued during the period		8			30
Reductions to pre-existing warranties		—			(314	)
Cash and other settlements made during the period		(3	)		(38	)
Ending balance	$	65		$	60

7. Commitments and Contingencies

     On December 7, 2001, we and certain of our officers and directors were named as defendants along with our underwriters in a securities class action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants participated in a scheme to inflate the price of our stock in our initial public offering and in the aftermarket through a series of misstatements and omissions associated with the offering. The lawsuit is one of several hundred similar cases pending in the Southern District of New York that have been consolidated by the court. In February 2003, the District Court issued an order denying a motion to dismiss by all defendants on common issues of law. In July 2003, we, along with over 300 other issuers named as defendants, agreed to a settlement of this litigation with plaintiffs. While the parties’ request for court approval of the settlement was pending, in December 2006 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the District Court’s determination that six focus cases could be certified as class actions. In April 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing, but acknowledged that the District Court might certify a more limited class. It is not yet clear what impact, if any, the Second Circuit’s decision will have on the pending settlement. The pending settlement would not require us to pay any settlement amounts nor issue any securities. In the event that the settlement is not granted final approval, we believe that these claims are without merit and we intend to defend vigorously against them.

     We and certain of our officers were named as defendants in a securities class action captioned “Curry v. Silicon Image, Inc., Steve Tirado, and Robert Gargus,” commenced on January 31, 2005. Plaintiffs filed the action on behalf of a putative class of stockholders who purchased Silicon Image stock between October 19, 2004 and January 24, 2005. The lawsuit alleged that Silicon Image and

11

certain of our officers and directors made alleged misstatements of material facts and violated certain provisions of Sections 20(a) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On April 27, 2005, the Court issued an order appointing lead plaintiff and approving the selection of lead counsel. On July 27, 2005 plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint (“CAC”). The CAC no longer named Mr. Gargus as an individual defendant, but added Dr. David Lee as an individual defendant. The CAC also expanded the class period from June 25, 2004 to April 22, 2005. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the CAC on September 26, 2005. Plaintiffs subsequently received leave to file, and did file, a second consolidated amended complaint (“Second CAC”) on December 8, 2005. The Second CAC extends the end of the class period from April 22, 2005 to October 13, 2005 and adds additional factual allegations under the same causes of action against Silicon Image, Mr. Tirado and Dr. Lee. The complaint also adds a new plaintiff, James D. Smallwood. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Second CAC on February 9, 2006. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss on April 10, 2006 and defendants filed a reply to plaintiffs’ opposition on May 19, 2006. On June 21, 2006 the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second CAC with leave to amend. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a third consolidated amended complaint (“Third CAC”) by the court established deadline of July 21, 2006. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Third CAC on September 1, 2006 and subsequent pleadings by the parties followed in November and December of 2006 and January of 2007. On February 23, 2007, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the Third CAC with leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Fourth CAC”) on March 30, 2007. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint on May 25, 2007. The motion is scheduled for hearing on September 7, 2007.

     On January 31, 2007, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Analogix Semiconductor, Inc. (“Analogix”), a semiconductor company based in California. The complaint charges Analogix with copyright infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets, and unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business practices. The lawsuit alleges that Analogix, without authorization and in violation of Silicon Image’s intellectual property rights, copied and used our proprietary register maps by gaining unauthorized access to Silicon Image’s proprietary and confidential information, illegally copied and modified Silicon Image’s semiconductor configuration software and knowingly and unlawfully encouraged its existing and prospective customers to modify and use Silicon Image’s semiconductor configuration software with Analogix’s chips, a use that is beyond the scope, and in violation of, the rights granted under, Silicon Image’s software license agreements. In addition to seeking monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial, we are seeking an injunction barring Analogix from misappropriating Silicon Image’s trade secrets. On June 18, 2007, Analogix filed a counterclaim alleging Silicon Image breached a confidentiality agreement by purportedly disclosing Analogix’s confidential information within Silicon Image. A trial date has been set for September 22, 2008.

     On January 14, 2005, we received a preliminary notification that the Securities and Exchange Commission had commenced a formal investigation involving trading in our securities. On February 14, 2005, through our legal counsel, we received a formal notification of that investigation and associated subpoenas. We are fully cooperating with the SEC in this matter.

     During 2006, we initiated a voluntary internal review of our historical stock option compensation practices. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors reviewed and accepted management’s findings and conclusions upon the completion of the internal review. As a result of the review, we recorded a net stock-based compensation charge in the fourth quarter of 2006 in the amount of $95,000 related to options granted on two dates where we concluded that a different measurement date was appropriate. We concluded that it was not necessary to make any adjustment to any previously issued financial statements. Subsequent to our initiation of this review, we received written notice from the SEC that it was conducting an informal inquiry into the Company’s option-granting practices during the period January 1, 2004 through October 31, 2006. In May 2007, we received notice from the SEC that it had completed its investigation without recommending that any enforcement action be taken.

     In addition, we have been named as defendants in a number of judicial and administrative proceedings incidental to our business and may be named again from time to time.

     We intend to defend all of the above matters vigorously, and although adverse decisions or settlements may occur in one or more of such cases, the final resolution of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

12

     Guarantees

     Certain of our licensing agreements indemnify our customers for any expenses or liabilities resulting from claimed infringements of third party patents, trademarks or copyrights by our products. Certain of these indemnification provisions are perpetual from execution of the agreement and, in some instances, the maximum amount of potential future indemnification is not limited. To date, we have not paid any such claims or been required to defend any lawsuits with respect to any claim. However, there can be no assurance that such claims will not be filed in the future.

     Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     The following table represents our future minimum payments under our operating leases, debt, inventory purchase and minimum royalty obligations outstanding at June 30, 2007 (in thousands):

Contractual obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Operating lease obligations	$	10,191	$	3,420	$	4,426	$	2,345		—
Inventory purchase obligations		13,130		13,130		—		—		—
Intangibles purchase commitments		30,280		24,750		5,530		—		—
Total contractual obligations	$	53,601	$	41,300	$	9,956	$	2,345	$	—

8. Customer and Geographic Information

     Revenue by geographic area, including development, licensing and royalty revenue was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Japan	$	27,646	$	24,665	$	51,728	$	39,433
Taiwan		15,902		14,551		28,147		29,292
United States		15,239		13,263		28,620		26,079
Europe		6,096		4,209		13,071		8,090
Hong Kong		5,516		2,429		8,125		4,474
Korea		4,865		5,946		8,749		11,366
Other		4,507		5,516		10,450		10,944
Total revenue	$	79,771	$	70,579	$	148,890	$	129,678

     Revenue by product line, including development, licensing and royalty revenue was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Consumer Electronics (1)	$	61,364	$	48,217	$	110,389	$	83,609
Personal Computer (1)		11,147		10,201		22,242		23,507
Storage (1)		7,260		12,161		16,259		22,562
Total revenue	$	79,771	$	70,579	$	148,890	$	129,678

(1) Includes development, licensing and royalty revenue

13

Revenue by product line, excluding development, licensing and royalty revenue was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Consumer Electronics	$	49,945	$	41,852	$	90,242	$	73,794
Personal Computer		10,190		9,650		19,911		22,469
Storage		5,740		10,165		11,388		18,684
Development, licensing and royalty revenue		13,896		8,912		27,349		14,731
Total revenue	$	79,771	$	70,579	$	148,890	$	129,678

     For the three months ended June 30, 2007, three customers each generated 18.3%, 12.5%, and 11.7% of our revenue, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, three customers each generated 16.6%, 13.2%, and 10.5%of our revenue, respectively. At June 30, 2007, two customers each represented 19.0%, and 10.6% of gross accounts receivable respectively.

     For the three months ended June 30, 2006, four customers each generated 18.2%, 14.2%, 11.3% and 10.6% of our revenue respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, four customers each generated 17.3%, 14.7%, 10.8% and 10.4% of our revenue respectively. At June 30, 2006, three customers each represented 14.2%, 12.4%, and 10.0% of gross accounts receivable.

     For each period presented, substantially all long-lived assets were located within the United States.

     Our Chief Executive Officer, who is considered to be our chief operating decision maker, or (“CODM”), reviews financial information presented on an operating segment basis for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. We operate in a single operating segment that includes the design, development and implementation of semiconductors for the secure storage, distribution and presentation of high-definition content.

9. Provision for income taxes

     For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $5.0 million and $8.6 million, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was 53.5% and 54.0% respectively. The effective tax rate is based on projected taxable income for 2007. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2007 of 53.5% comprised of 41.4%, 1.0% and 11.1% for federal, state and foreign, respectively.

     For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $5.2 million and $6.8 million, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was 47.3% and 45.6% and was based on our projected taxable income for 2006. The effective tax rate took into account the fact that a portion of the expected benefit due to the use of net operating loss and research credit carryforwards resulted from stock option transactions, and therefore was not expected to reduce the income tax provision, but instead would be recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital when realized. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2006 of 47.3% was comprised of 40.8% Federal, 3.9% State and 2.6% foreign. We provided a valuation allowance of $52.3 million as of December 31, 2005 on 100% of the net deferred tax assets as management determined it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would not be realized. In the fourth quarter of 2006, we released our valuation allowance as we determined that the deferred tax assets at that time were more likely than not, to be realized. We continue to assess the recoverability of the deferred tax assets on an ongoing basis.

     We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

     As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, we recorded a reduction to opening retained earnings as of January 1, 2007 of approximately $4.7 million related primarily to our measurement of certain tax credits based on the requirements of FIN 48. We have historically classified accruals for tax uncertainties in current taxes payable and, where appropriate, as a reduction to deferred tax assets. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, we have reclassified $5.6 million from current taxes payable to other long term liabilities. In addition, we further increased other long term liabilities by $4.0 million, decreased current deferred tax assets by $2.3 million and increased non-current deferred tax assets by $1.7 million.

14

     As of the adoption date, we had gross tax affected unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $14.4 million of which $11.5 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. We anticipate an increase to the unrecognized tax benefits during 2007 as compared to 2006, related primarily to tax credits and certain U.S. and foreign tax positions related to our global expansion strategy. The 2007 changes to the unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations for 2007 as the effects of these items are included in our current estimates of the forecasted 2007 tax provision. We will reexamine our tax provision and any effect that estimated unrecognized tax benefits may have on our financial position at each reporting period and update our estimates as appropriate at that time.

     Our policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes and, as of the adoption date, we had accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $60,000. The provision for income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 included approximately $130,000 and $160,000 respectively, of interest on unrecognized tax benefits.

     We conduct business globally and, as a result, we and one or more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in various jurisdictions throughout the world including with the U.S. federal and various U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. We remain subject to federal and state examination for all years from 1995 forward by virtue of the tax attributes carrying forward from those years. We also remain subject to examination in most foreign jurisdictions for all years since 2002 or the year we began operations in those countries if later. We are not aware of any material income tax examinations in progress at this time.

10. Business Acquisition

     The following acquisition was accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Accordingly, the results of operations are included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income since the acquisition date, and the related assets and liabilities were recorded based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition. Pro forma financial information has not been presented as their historical operations were not material to our consolidated financial statements.

     On January 2, 2007, we acquired sci-worx GmbH (“sci-worx”), a leading intellectual property (“IP”) and design service provider specializing in multimedia, communications, and networking applications, for a cash consideration of approximately $15.8 million (net cash consideration of $13.8 million) for 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, we incurred approximately $410,000 in costs directly related to the consummation of this transaction. These costs were included in the total purchase price consideration. The acquisition of sci-worx is expected to enhance our ability to integrate additional functions into our semiconductors and to accelerate the expansion of our system-on-a-chip (“SoC”) design capabilities for the storage, distribution and presentation of high-definition (“HD”) content in the consumer environment. The results of sci-worx have been included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.

15

     The allocation of purchase price consideration is as follows: (in thousands)

	January 3, 2007
Cash	$	2,015
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts		2,598
Unbilled accounts receivable		1,077
Inventories, net		191
Other current assets		661
Property and equipment, net		1,583
Intangible assets, net		3,140
Other long-term assets		38
Deferred tax assets		1,910
Total assets acquired	$	13,213
Accounts payable	$	548
Accrued liabilities		1,131
Other current liabilities		1,509
Total liabilities assumed	$	3,188

     The allocation of the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the time of the acquisition is as follows (in thousands):

Net tangible assets acquired	$	6,885
Goodwill		6,110
Others		41
Intangible assets and other:
Core developed technology		970
Customer relationships		810
Contractual backlog		1,360
		16,176
Direct acquisition costs		410
Purchase price	$	15,766

     During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we adjusted the goodwill relating to intellectual property commission of approximately $79,000 not accounted for at the time of the acquisition.

Intangible Assets

     The core developed technology and customer relationships intangible assets are being amortized over an estimated useful life between two to four years, and the contractual backlog intangible asset is being amortized over an estimated useful life of one year. No residual value has been estimated for the intangible assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangibles, we will evaluate the acquired goodwill for impairment on an annual basis.

Identifiable intangible assets comprise the following (in thousands):

			June 30, 2007
			Accumulated
	Gross Amount		Amortization		Net book value
Intangible assets and other:
Core developed technology	$	970	$	187	$	783
Customer relationships		810		162		648
Contractual backlog		1,360		725		635
Total	$	3,140	$	1,074	$	2,066

16

Estimated future amortization expense for our intangible assets is as follows for the fiscal years ending December 31 (in thousands):

2008	$	697
2009		237
2010		150
2011		—
2012		—
	$	1,084

11. License of Sunplus Intellectual Property and Related Revenue Transaction

     In February 2007, we entered into a Video Processor Design License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd. (“Sunplus”) to license certain technology (“IP Technology purchased”) from Sunplus for $40.0 million, as described below, and to license certain of our intellectual property (“IP Technology sold”) to Sunplus for $5.0 million. The purpose of the IP Technology purchased is to obtain advanced video processor technology for development of future Silicon Image products. The IP Technology sold to Sunplus provides them with comprehensive digital television system functionality. In February 2007, we also entered into a Video Processor Development, Marketing and Sales Agreement (“Development Agreement”) with Sunplus with the objective of jointly developing and marketing a chip that would use the technologies in the License Agreement. In June 2007, the parties mutually agreed to amend and terminate the Development Agreement due to change in future market demand for the specific chip to be developed.

     The License Agreement continues to be in effect and provides for the payment of an aggregate of $40.0 million to Sunplus by Silicon Image, $35.0 million of which is payable in consideration for the licensed technology and related deliverables and $5.0 million of which is payable in consideration for Sunplus support and maintenance obligations. We paid Sunplus $10.0 million of the consideration for the licensed technology and related deliverables in February 2007 and accrued for $5.0 million of the consideration for the period ended June 30, 2007. We are required to pay the remaining $20.0 million upon delivery and acceptance of certain milestones. The $5.0 million to be paid for support and maintenance by Sunplus is payable over a two-year period starting upon delivery of the final Sunplus deliverables. As of June 30, 2007, the amounts paid under this agreement are recorded as other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

     During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we completed the delivery of IP Technology sold to Sunplus under the license agreement and received final acceptance. In the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we recognized revenue of $4.9 million for the delivery of the IP Technology sold, which represented the $5.0 million license amount less $0.1 million for the fair value of support and maintenance which we are required to provide to Sunplus for one year.

12. Related Party Transaction

     On November 8, 2005, the Board of Directors of Silicon Image approved David Lee, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Simplay Labs, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Silicon Image, Inc., making an investment in and joining the Board of Directors of Synerchip Co., Ltd. (“Synerchip”). On November 21, 2005, Dr. Lee was appointed to the Board of Directors of Synerchip. Dr. Lee made a personal investment in the amount of $10,000 directly in Synerchip, and a limited partnership he controls made an investment in the amount of $500,000 in Synerchip. Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd. (“Sunplus”), a long-time customer and vendor of Silicon Image also has Board representation and an investment in Synerchip. Because of Sunplus’ representation on the Board of Directors of Synerchip and investment in Synerchip, Synerchip may be deemed an affiliate of Sunplus. On March 24, 2006, Dr. Lee resigned as an employee of Silicon Image and its related subsidiary Simplay Labs; therefore, Sunplus and Synerchip ceased as related parties to Silicon Image as of such date.

     The related party transactions with Sunplus and Synerchip and its related subsidiaries and affiliates through the six month period ended June 30, 2006 ( which consist of transactions occurring during 2006 on or before March 24, 2006) are described below:

     Silicon Image paid $363,000 to Sunplus for purchases of integrated semiconductors for the six month period ended June 30, 2006.

     Silicon Image paid $221,000 to Synerchip for purchases of integrated semiconductors for the six month period ended June 30, 2006.

     In March 2002, Silicon Image and Sunplus entered into a five-year Technology License Agreement pursuant to which Sunplus licensed certain LVDS receiver technology from Silicon Image. In connection with this agreement, Sunplus paid $132,000 to Silicon Image in related royalty fees for the six month period ended June 30, 2006.

     In June 2003, Silicon Image and Sunplus entered into a three-year Strategic Relationship Agreement for joint manufacturing, marketing, selling and distribution of certain semiconductors. In connection with this agreement, Sunplus paid annual subscription fees to Silicon Image in the amounts of $50,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2006.

17

13. Stock Repurchase Program

     In February 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we intend, from time to time, as business conditions warrant, to purchase up to $100 million of common stock, on the open market, or in negotiated or block transactions, over a 36 month period. We may commence purchasing, or increase, decrease or discontinue purchasing at any time without any prior notice. On May 8, 2007 and May 28, 2007, we entered into two Stock Trading Plans to facilitate our repurchases of common stock. Under the May 8, 2007 Stock Trading Plan, we authorized the repurchase of up to 1,250,000 of our common shares at prevailing market prices. Under the May 28, 2007 Stock Trading Plan, we authorized the repurchase of up to 2,500,000 of our common shares at prevailing markets. Under our stock repurchase program, we can repurchase our common stock at any time and from time to time during the 36 month period commencing February 12, 2007. From February through June 30, 2007, we repurchased a total of 3.75 million shares of our common stock at a total cost of $31.1 million.

18

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those identified in the section of this Form 10-Q entitled “Factors Affecting Future Results,” that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements within this Form 10-Q are identified by words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “may,” “will” and variations of such words and other similar expressions. However, these words are not the only means of identifying such statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances occurring subsequent to the filing of this Form 10-Q with the SEC. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in, or implied by, forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the risks outlined elsewhere in this report. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by Silicon Image, Inc. in this report and in our other reports filed with the SEC that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business.

     Silicon Image and Simplay HD are trademarks, registered trademarks or service marks of Silicon Image, Inc. in the United States and other countries. HDMI™ and High-Definition Multimedia Interface are trademarks or registered trademarks of HDMI Licensing, LLC in the United States and other countries, and are used under license from HDMI Licensing, LLC. All other trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Available Information

     Our Internet website address is www.siliconimage.com. We are not including the information contained on our web site as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We make available free of charge, through our Internet website, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable, after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

     Headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, we are a leader in driving the design, development and implementation of semiconductors for the secure storage, distribution and presentation of high-definition content. We create and promote industry standards for digital content delivery such as the Digital Visual Interface specification (“DVI”), the High Definition Multimedia Interface™ or HDMI™ and the Serial Advanced Technology Attachment specification (“SATA”), leveraging partnerships with global leaders in the consumer electronics and personal computing markets to meet the growing digital content needs of consumers worldwide. We are also a leading provider of semiconductor intellectual property solutions for high-definition multimedia and data storage applications.

     Our mission is to be the leader in the design, development and implementation of semiconductors for the secure storage, distribution and presentation of high-definition content in the home and mobile environments. We are dedicated to the promotion of technologies, standards and products that facilitate the movement of digital content between and among digital devices across the consumer electronics (“CE”), personal computer (“PC”) and storage markets. We have been at the forefront of the development and promotion of several industry-standard, high-speed, digital, secure interfaces, including the DVI, HDMI and the SATA.

     We place an emphasis on understanding and having strategic relationships within the ecosystem of companies that provide the content and products that drive digital content creation and consumption. Towards that end, we have developed strategic relationships with major Hollywood studios such as Universal, Warner Brothers, Disney and Fox and leading consumer electronics companies such as Sony, Hitachi, Toshiba, Matsushita (Panasonic), Philips and Thomson. Through these relationships we have formed a strong understanding of the requirements for storing, distributing and viewing high quality digital video and audio in the home and mobile environments, especially in the area of High Definition (“HD”) content. We have also developed a substantial intellectual property (“IP”) base for building open standards and products necessary to promote opportunities for our products.

     DVI, a video-only standard that we pioneered and designed for PC applications, enables PCs to send video data between a computer and a digital display. By defining a robust, high-speed serial communication link between host systems and displays, DVI enables sharper, crystal-clear images and lower cost designs. Accommodating bandwidth in excess of 165 MHz, DVI provides UXGA support with a single-link interface. In many applications DVI is being replaced by the more feature-rich HDMI.

19

     HDMI is a high-bandwidth, all-digital, interconnect technology used in both CE and PC applications to provide high quality uncompressed video and audio. Through the creation and development of the HDMI standard along with Sony, Hitachi, Toshiba, Matsushita (Panasonic), Philips and Thomson, we helped drive a worldwide standard for digital connectivity that has resulted in an installed base of over 85 million devices as of the end of 2006, according to market-research firm In-Stat. In-Stat projects that over 325 million HDMI enabled devices will ship in 2010 resulting in an installed base of almost 1 billion units by the end of 2010.

     We also believe a world of digital devices requires a robust testing regimen to ensure rock-solid plug and play interoperability. Today we operate several HDMI Authorized testing centers in Asia, Europe and North America that do this vital testing. We also saw a market need to develop a much more comprehensive test suite in 2005 and launched a new program called Simplay HD™. The Simplay HD program offers the industry what we believe to be the most comprehensive method for ensuring product interoperability. It also provides consumers with a way of identifying products that have had rigorous testing and are “best-in-class” tested for broad plug and play trouble free usage. The Simplay HD Testing Program is open to all manufacturers of consumer electronics devices implementing HDMI and High-bandwidth Digital Content Protections (“HDCP”), including HDTVs, STBs, DVD players, A/V receivers and cables. More than 160 products had been Simplay HD-verified, conferring upon those products a higher level of consumer trust that the products are HDMI compliant and fully interoperable with other HDMI-compliant products. We believe that Simplay has further enhanced our reputation for quality, reliable products and leadership in the HDMI market.

     The rate of innovation within the HDMI standard has been rapid, with 6 revisions of the standard over the last 5 years. These releases have brought greater benefits to the consumer in terms of digital video and audio quality and increased functionality. We believe that we can obtain a competitive advantage as the only merchant semiconductor supplier in the HDMI founding member group. Our unique position has enabled as to introduce new innovations in quality and connectivity into the HDMI standard revisions and produce products that are first to market.

     HDMI Licensing, LLC issued its fifth HDMI version (“HDMI 1.3”) in June 2006 and its sixth version (“HDMI 1.3a”) in November 2006. We introduced the industry’s first family of HDMI 1.3 products in the summer of 2006, providing a time-to-market advantage to our customers. By the end of December 31, 2006, a number of top-tier CE manufacturers had announced products using our HDMI products, led by Sony (Playstation3) and Samsung Electronics (BD-P1200 Blu-ray Disc player and its new plasma, liquid crystal display (“LCD”) and Digital Light Processing (“DLP”) High Definition Televisions (“HDTVs”). Subsequently, we had a number of other companies develop products using our HDMI 1.3 chips.

     We shipped the first HDMI-compliant silicon to the market, and we remain a market leader for HDMI functionality, with more than 97 million units shipped to date. We recently expanded our HDMI product line with the introduction of the industry’s first HDMI 1.3-compliant discrete receiver and transmitter discrete chips, a new switch product family and a new family of integrated input processors designed to help manufacturers offer cutting-edge HDMI 1.3 functionality. During the first half year of 2007, approximately 40 percent of our consumer electronics product revenue was derived from IC sales of 1.3 or 1.3a class products. During the second quarter of 2007, we shipped the first million units of a new family of higher value, more integrated input processor semiconductor, which supports HDMI 1.3.

     Market Opportunity

     Our HDMI interconnect technology is used in many high-definition products, including both source and receiver devices. Source devices include DVD players, HD and Blu-ray DVD recorders, audio/video (“A/V”) receivers, set-top boxes (“STBs”), game consoles, digital cameras and high definition camcorders, and receiver devices include digital TVs.

     According to the market research firm In-Stat, an estimated over 63 million HDMI-enabled devices were shipped worldwide in 2006, including nearly 61 million CE devices. In-Stat projects that approximately 130 million devices, including approximately 115 million CE devices, will be shipped worldwide in 2007.

     The market acceptance and adoption of HDMI has been a significant factor in our growth over the last several years, driving both our product and licensing revenues. As of June 30, 2007, approximately 650 companies had licensed HDMI from HDMI Licensing, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary and the agent responsible for the licensing of HDMI. HDMI has the support of major Hollywood studios as part of their ongoing efforts in the areas of digital rights management and content protection, since HDMI offers significant advantages over analog A/V interfaces, including the ability to transmit uncompressed, high-definition digital video and multi-channel digital audio over a single cable.

20

     A key element of our growth in CE product sales during the past several years has been our ability to work closely with top-tier CE original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) in developing new capabilities and features to incorporate into the HDMI standard. We also work closely with our customers to develop a broad line of products to meet their various needs for particular market segments (e.g., semiconductors with advanced features for high-end products, and lower-priced semiconductor solutions for mid-range, mass- market products).

     For CE manufacturers, HDMI is a lower-cost, standardized means of interconnecting their devices, which enables these manufacturers to build feature-rich products that deliver a true home theatre entertainment experience. For consumers, HDMI provides a simpler way to connect and use devices which provide the higher-quality entertainment experience available with digital content.

     For PC and monitor manufacturers, HDMI enables PCs to connect to digital TVs (“DTVs”) and monitors DTVs with HD quality video signals. More than 110 HDMI PC products are currently on the market, including HDMI-enabled products from major OEMs for desktop media-center PCs and notebook PCs, as well as add-in graphics cards, motherboards and LCD monitors. The introduction of Microsoft’s new operating system in January 2007, Vista, with its digital content rights management requirements, has also generated increased interest in HDMI connectivity by PC manufacturers.

     In the storage market, we have assumed a leadership role in Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (“SATA”). SATA, based on serial signaling technology, is a computer bus technology for connecting hard disk drives and other devices that is faster than traditional Parallel Advance Technology Attachment specification (“PATA”) or USB connectors. SATA is replacing parallel PATA in desktop storage and making inroads in the enterprise arena due to its improved price/performance ratio. The market for external SATA (“eSATA”) has grown significantly since mid-2005. eSATA connectors enable faster transmission of data than traditional PATA or USB connectors. We are a leading supplier of discrete SATA and eSATA solutions for motherboard and add-in-card manufacturers.

     With the advent of portable media players, such as MP3 players and other similar devices, consumers are downloading and storing an increasing array of digital content, including video, photos, and music, which we believe is creating a growing awareness and need for low-cost, simple, secure and reliable CE storage. In late 2006, we introduced our second generation SteelVine™ storage processor to address this anticipated market demand. Our storage processor solutions are fully SATA-compliant and offer SoC implementations that include a high-speed switch, a custom-designed dual-instruction RISC (reduced instruction set computing) microprocessor, firmware, SATA interface, as well as advanced features and capabilities such as 3 Giga bits per second (“Gb/s”) support Native Command Queuing, hot plug, port multiplier capability and ATAPI support.

     New Initiatives

     At the beginning of 2007, we completed two important transactions. These transactions enhance our ability to offer higher levels of integration and greater price/performance value to our customers.

     In February 2007, we entered into an intellectual property license from Sunplus Technology Co. The IP licensed to us in this transaction represents approximately 60 blocks of market-tested IP in the area of DTV and DVD SoC implementations. These IP blocks represent fundamental building blocks in the DVD and DTV markets that are expected to advance our connectivity solutions for the home and mobile environment as well as allow us to offer greater value to our customers. We anticipate that our first generation of products based on this IP will start shipping in 2008, and will include our second generation of integrated input processors.

     The other transaction, our acquisition of sci-worx GmbH, was completed in January 2007, and provided a combination of additional IP, especially in the areas of multi-format decoders, and a highly skilled labor pool of engineers who will increase our capacity to absorb the Sunplus IP and put it to use in new more integrated products over the next several years.

          The sci-worx and Sunplus transactions were important steps in our efforts to support our future growth. These two initiatives are expected to allow us to complement our digital connectivity innovations with more value as we integrate many of the processing blocks required by our customers.

     Future Directions

     Our view of tomorrow includes the consumer’s ability to purchase digital content from any source (cable, satellite, terrestrial broadcast or the Internet) and the ability to securely store it, move it and display it on any device they own. This will require the advancement of home connectivity in the area of protocols and content protection. These two areas represent two of our key core

21

competencies. We believe we now have a larger and more comprehensive IP portfolio, talent and vision to implement compelling products, technologies and standards that enhances our ability to realize our vision of digital content everywhere. We expect to introduce such products including a new category of analog products during the second half of 2007.

     During 2006, we commenced the implementation of a global strategy that we believe will, in the long run, result in certain operational benefits as well as provide us with a lower annual effective tax rate that is lower than if we did not pursue this strategy. Our strategy involves an increased investment in technology and headcount outside of the United States in order to better align asset ownership and business functions with our expectations related to the sources, timing and amounts of future revenues and profits. As a result of undertaking these efforts, we anticipate our 2007 annual effective tax rate to approximate 55% which is materially higher than our combined statutory rates of approximately 38%. The difference between the annual effective tax rate and the combined statutory rates of 38% was due primarily to certain forecasted unbenefited foreign losses in 2007 related to the ongoing implementation of a new global business structure. The unbenefited foreign losses represent expenses for sharing in the costs of our ongoing research and development efforts as well as licensing commercial rights to exploit pre-existing intangibles to better align with customers outside the Americas. In future years, we expect to achieve operational benefits and a lower tax rate in connection with this new business structure. — See “Risk Factors — There are risks to our global strategy.

Concentrations, Commitments and Contingencies

     Historically, a relatively small number of customers and distributors have generated a significant portion of our revenue. For instance, our top five customers, including distributors, generated 56.6% and 54.0 % of our total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 60.3% and 58.6% of our total revenue for the same periods of 2006, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of revenue generated through distributors tends to be significant, since many original equipment manufacturers (OEM’s) rely upon third party manufacturers or distributors to provide purchasing and inventory management functions. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, 42.9% and 42.5% of our total revenue, respectively, was generated through distributors, compared to 54.6% and 56.6% in the comparable periods of 2006, respectively. Our licensing revenue is not generated through distributors, and to the extent licensing revenue increases faster than product revenue, we would expect a decrease in the percentage of our total revenue generated through distributors.

     A significant portion of our revenue is generated from products sold overseas. Sales to customers in Asia, including distributors, generated 73.2% and 71.9% of our total revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 75.2% and 73.6% for the same periods of 2006, respectively. The reason for the geographical concentration in Asia is that most of our products are part of flat panel TVs, graphic cards and motherboards, the majority of which are manufactured in Asia. The percentage of our revenue derived from any country is dependent upon where our end customers choose to manufacture their products. Accordingly, variability in our geographic revenue is not necessarily indicative of any geographic trends, but rather is the combined effect of new design wins and changes in customer manufacturing locations. All revenue to date has been denominated in U.S. dollars.

     Our commitments and contingencies at June 30, 2007, are presented in Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Critical Accounting Policies

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and all known facts and circumstances that we believe are relevant. Actual results may differ materially from our estimates. We believe the following accounting policies to be most critical to an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations because they require us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates include those regarding (1) revenue recognition, (2) cash equivalents and short-term investments, (3) concentration of credit risk, (4) allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, (5) inventories, (6) long-lived assets, (7) goodwill and intangible assets, (8) deferred tax assets, (9) accrued liabilities, (10) guarantees, indemnifications and warranty liabilities, (11) stock-based compensation expense, (12) advertising and research and development, and (13) legal matters. For a discussion of the critical accounting estimates, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

22

Foreign Currency Transactions

     The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries (except for our subsidiaries in Cayman Islands and Netherlands) are measured using the foreign subsidiary’s local currency as the functional currency. Revenues and expenses of such subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Assets and liabilities have been translated at the rates of exchange on the balance-sheet date. The resulting translation gain and loss adjustments are recorded directly as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency translation adjustments resulted in losses of $125,000 for the period ending June 30, 2007. For our Cayman Islands and Netherlands subsidiaries, the US Dollar is the functional currency.

Results of Operations

REVENUE

	Three months ended June 30,							Six months ended June 30,
	2007		2006		Change			2007		2006		Change
	(dollars in thousands)							(dollars in thousands)
Product revenue	$	65,875	$	61,667		6.8	%	$	121,541	$	114,947		5.7	%
Development, licensing and royalty revenue		13,896		8,912		55.9	%		27,349		14,731		85.7	%
Total revenue	$	79,771	$	70,579		13.0	%	$	148,890	$	129,678		14.8	%

	Three months ended June 30,							Six months ended June 30,
	2007		2006		Change			2007		2006		Change
	(dollars in thousands)							(dollars in thousands)
Consumer Electronics (1)	$	61,364	$	48,217		27.3	%	$	110,389	$	83,609		32.0	%
Personal Computers (1)		11,147		10,201		9.3	%		22,242		23,507		-5.4	%
Storage (1)		7,260		12,161		-40.3	%		16,259		22,562		-27.9	%
Total revenue	$	79,771	$	70,579		13.0	%	$	148,890	$	129,678		14.8	%

(1) Includes development, licensing and royalty revenue

	Three months ended June 30,							Six months ended June 30,
	2007		2006		Change			2007		2006		Change
	(dollars in thousands)							(dollars in thousands)
Consumer Electronics	$	49,945	$	41,852		19.3	%	$	90,242	$	73,794		22.3	%
Personal Computers		10,190		9,650		5.6	%		19,911		22,469		-11.4	%
Storage		5,740		10,165		-43.5	%		11,388		18,684		-39.0	%
Development, licensing and royalty revenue		13,896		8,912		55.9	%		27,349		14,731		85.7	%
Total revenue	$	79,771	$	70,579		13.0	%	$	148,890	$	129,678		14.8	%

     Total revenues for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 were $79.8 million and $148.9 million, respectively, representing an increase of 13.0% and 14.8% over the comparable periods in 2006 respectively. The increase in revenues is primarily due to increase in revenues from our Consumer Electronics (“CE”) and development, licensing and royalty revenue offset by declines in revenues from our storage products. The increase in CE revenues compared to comparable periods in 2006 is primarily due to increased shipments of all CE parts particularly the HDMI 1.3 chips. CE revenues also increased due to the CE revenues from our acquisition of sci-worx (now Silicon Image Germany). This increase in CE revenues was partially offset by decreases in average selling prices (“ASP”) across all CE products. The decrease in ASPs is the result of our product mix which resulted in higher shipments of lower priced switches and HDMI PHY semiconductors. Our HDMI 1.3 chips are targeted towards the DTV, AV receiver, Blue Ray recorders, HD DVD, game console and mobile markets. We believe that as the market acceptance of the HDMI 1.3 standard continues to grow, sales of our HDMI 1.3 products will contribute a significant percentage of our CE revenues; however, this increase in HDMI 1.3 products sales will be impacted by expected declines in the ASPs. There was an increase in PC revenues for three months but an overall decrease in the six months ended June 30, 2007 over the comparable period in 2006 primarily due to ASP declines in the PC

23

business partially offset by increase in units sold of the DVI and HDMI chips. The decline in ASPs is the result of increased competition and incorporation of HDMI standard by the manufacturers of graphic processors, graphic cards, motherboards, etc. The decrease in storage revenue is primarily due to decreases in ASPs. The decrease in ASP is due to the competitive nature of the storage business and a slower than desired transition in our storage business from our legacy non-core storage semiconductor products to our SteelVine storage processor products. Development, licensing and royalty revenues increased due to increased licensing activity attributable to the CE HDMI and Storage SATA as well as the timing of recognition of revenue development and licensing arrangements.

COST OF REVENUE AND GROSS PROFIT

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
	(dollars in thousands)									(dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue (1)	$	36,938		$	29,785			24.0	%	$	67,696		$	55,133			22.8	%
Total gross profit	$	42,833		$	40,794			5.0	%	$	81,194		$	74,545			8.9	%
Gross profit margin		53.7	%		57.8	%					54.5	%		57.5	%

(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense $ 443 $ 554 $ 789 $ 1,182

     Cost of revenue consists primarily of costs incurred to manufacture, assemble and test our products, license development costs, as well as other related overhead costs relating to the aforementioned costs including stock-based compensation expense. Total cost of revenue was $36.9 million and $67.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $29.8 million and $55.1 million for the comparable period in 2006. The $7.2 million and $12.6 million increase in cost of revenue for three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 respectively, over the comparable period of 2006 was primarily due to increased unit volume associated with higher product revenue and associated overhead expense, increase in inventory reserves for certain slow moving parts, integration expenses associated with the sci-worx acquisition and higher depreciation expense from additional testing equipment. Stock-based compensation expense decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 over the comparable periods of 2006 primarily as a result of changes in our Black-Scholes fair value assumptions as described in Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement under Item 1.

     Total gross profit was $42.8 million and $81.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 an increase of 5.0% and 8.9%, respectively from $40.8 million and $74.5 million for the same period of 2006. Our gross profit margin of 53.7% and 54.5% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 decreased from 57.8% and 57.5% for the same period of 2006. Gross profit margins in absolute dollars increased for the first three and six months of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 as a result of overall increase in sales, primarily in CE including the increase in development and licensing activities but the gross margin percentage decreased over the same period as a result of decreases in product ASPs, changes in product mix and increases in cost of revenues as discussed above.

24

OPERATING EXPENSES

     Research and Development (“R&D”).

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
	(dollars in thousands)									(dollars in thousands)
Research and development (1)	$	19,025		$	15,179			25.3	%	$	36,220		$	30,745			17.8	%
Percentage of total revenue		23.8	%		21.5	%					24.3	%		23.7	%

(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense $ 2,056 $ 2,800 $ 4,364 $ 5,612

     R&D expense consists primarily of employee compensation, including stock-based compensation expense, and other related costs, fees for independent contractors, the cost of software tools used for designing and testing our products, and costs associated with prototype materials. R&D expense was $19.0 million and $36.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $15.2 million and $30.7 million for the same period in 2006, respectively. R&D expenses increased due to the integration of sci-worx engineers, increases in our China operations, overall increase in other R&D activities during the quarter partially offset by reduced reliance on temporary and consulting contractors. The increase was also partially mitigated by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 as a result of changes in our Black-Scholes fair value assumptions as described in Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial statements.

     Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”).

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
	(dollars in thousands)									(dollars in thousands)
Selling, general and administrative (2)	$	17,151		$	16,563			3.6	%	$	34,295		$	32,025			7.1	%
Percentage of total revenue		21.5	%		23.5	%					23.0	%		24.7	%

(2) Includes stock-based compensation expense $ 2,687 $ 3,197 $ 4,065 $ 7,040

     SG&A expense consists primarily of employee compensation, including stock-based compensation expense, sales commissions, professional fees, marketing and promotional expenses. SG&A expense was $17.2 million and $34.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $16.6 million and $32.0 million for the same period in 2006, respectively. The increase in SG&A expenses is primarily due to the integration of sci-worx, increased compensation expense as a result of higher headcount, increased consulting expense for implementation of our global strategy, increased legal expense for various patent filings and litigation activities partially offset by decreased bonus and commission accruals as a result of lower achievement relative to plan and decrease in stock-based compensation expense as a result of changes in our Black-Scholes fair value assumptions as described in Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

     Amortization of Intangible Assets.

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
	(dollars in thousands)									(dollars in thousands)
Amortization of intangible assets	$	537		$	78			588.5	%	$	1,152		$	351			228.2	%
Percentage of total revenue		0.7	%		0.1	%					0.8	%		0.3	%

     Amortization of intangible assets was $537,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $78,000 and $351,000 for the same period in 2006. The increase in the amortization of intangible assets is primarily in connection with the intangible assets acquired in the sci-worx acquisition as described in Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

25

     Interest Income and other, net.

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
	(dollars in thousands)									(dollars in thousands)
Interest income and other, net	$	3,290		$	2,020			62.9	%	$	6,316		$	3,558			77.5	%
Percentage of total revenue		4.1	%		2.9	%					4.2	%		2.7	%

     The interest income and other, net, which principally includes interest income, was $3.3 million and $6.3 million for the three and six month ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to $2.0 million and $3.6 million for the same periods of 2006. This increase was primarily due to higher interest income resulting from increase in average cash and investment balances and increase in interest rates in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the same periods of 2006.

     Provision for income taxes.

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
	(dollars in thousands)									(dollars in thousands)
Provision for income taxes	$	5,038		$	5,196			-3.0	%	$	8,555		$	6,832			25.2	%
Percentage of total revenue		6.3	%		7.4	%					5.7	%		5.3	%

     For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $5.0 million and $8.6 million, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was 53.5% and 54.0% respectively. The effective tax rate is based on projected taxable income for 2007. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2007 of 53.5% comprised of 41.4%, 1.0% and 11.1% for federal, state and foreign, respectively. The difference between the provision for income taxes and the income tax determined by applying the combined statutory rates of 38% was due primarily to certain forecasted unbenefited foreign losses in 2007 related to the ongoing implementation of a new global business structure. The unbenefited foreign losses represent expenses for sharing in the costs of our ongoing research and development efforts as well as licensing commercial rights to exploit pre-existing intangibles to better align with customers outside the Americas. The new global structure is designed to better align asset ownership and business functions with our expectations related to the sources, timing and amounts of future revenues and profits.

     In future years, we expect to achieve operational benefits and a lower tax rate in connection with this new business structure. See “Risk Factors – There are risks to our global strategy.”

     The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes–an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) as of January 1, 2007. See “Note 9: Provision for income taxes” to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

     For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $5.2 million and $6.8 million, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six month ended June 30, 2006 was 47.3% and 45.6%, respectively, and was based on our projected taxable income for 2006. The effective tax rate took into account the fact that a portion of the expected benefit due to the use of net operating loss and research credit carryforwards related to stock option transactions, the benefit of which would not reduce the income tax provision and instead would be recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital when recognized.

LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

	June 30,			June 30,
	2007			2006			Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments	$	202,912		$	189,030		$	13,882
Cash provided by operating activities	$	4,080		$	20,269		$	(16,189	)
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities		14,329			(67,180	)		81,509
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(20,644	)		13,571			(34,215	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash & cash equivalents		(125	)		—			(125	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(2,360	)	$	(33,340	)	$	30,980

26

     Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

     Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $202.9 million at June 30, 2007, an increase of $13.9 million from $189.0 million at June 30, 2006 primarily as a result of increased sales activities, $9.7 million proceeds in connection with funds received on the exercise of stock options and for purchases of stock by employees under the ESPP partially offset by $31.1 million in stock repurchases, $13.8 million on purchase of sci-worx, $10.0 million on purchase of intangibles from Sunplus.

     Operating Activities

     We generated $4.1 million in cash from operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $20.3 million in the same period of 2006. The decrease in cash from operating activities was primarily due to increase in prepaid expenses and others assets, decrease in accrued expenses and deferred license revenue partially offset by increase in accounts payable and decrease in inventory during the six months of the year ended June 30, 2007.

     Investing and Financing Activities

     We generated $14.3 million in cash in our investing activities in the six month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $67.2 million used in the same period of 2006. The increase in cash provided by investing activities is mainly due to sale of securities (net of purchases) of approximately $45.7 million partially offset by purchase of sci-worx for $13.8 million, purchase of intangibles related to Sunplus transaction $10.0 million and miscellaneous other asset purchases of $7.6 million. We used $20.6 million in our financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $13.6 million provided by financing activities for the same period in 2006. The use of the cash from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is primarily due to $31.1 million of stock repurchases partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and sales of shares under our employee stock purchase plan.

     Commitments and Contractual Obligations

     Future minimum payments for our operating leases, debt and inventory related purchase obligations outstanding at June 30, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

Contractual obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Operating lease obligations	$	10,191	$	3,420	$	4,426	$	2,345		—
Inventory purchase obligations		13,130		13,130		—		—		—
Intangibles purchase commitments		30,280		24,750		5,530		—		—
	$	53,601	$	41,300	$	9,956	$	2,345		—

27

     Unrecognized Tax Benefits

     As of the FIN 48 adoption date of January 1, 2007, we had gross tax affected unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $14.4 million (refer Note 9). As of June 30, 2007, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authority, hence the unrecognized tax benefits has been excluded from the above commitment and contractual obligations table.

     Stock Repurchase Program

     In February 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we intend, from time to time, as business conditions warrant, to purchase up to $100 million of common stock, on the open market, or in negotiated or block transactions, over a 36 month period. We may commence purchasing, or increase, decrease or discontinue purchasing at any time without any prior notice. On May 8, 2007 and May 28, 2007, we entered into two Stock Trading Plans to facilitate our repurchases of common stock. Under the May 8, 2007 Stock Trading Plan, we authorized the repurchase of up to 1,250,000 of our common shares at prevailing market prices. Under the May 28, 2007 Stock Trading Plan, we authorized the repurchase of up to 2,500,000 of our common shares at prevailing markets. Under our stock repurchase program, we can repurchase our common stock at any time and from time to time during the 36 month period commencing February 12, 2007. From February through June 30, 2007, we repurchased a total of 3.75 million shares of our common stock at a total cost of $31.1 million.

     Long-term liquidity

     Based on our estimated cash flows, we believe our existing cash and short-term investments are sufficient to meet our capital and operating requirements for at least the next twelve months. We expect to continue to invest in property and equipment in the ordinary course of business. Our future operating and capital requirements depend on many factors, including the levels at which we generate product revenue and related margins, the extent to which we generate cash through stock option exercises and proceeds from sales of shares under our employee stock purchase plan, the timing and extent of development, licensing and royalty revenue, investments in inventory, property, plant and equipment and accounts receivable, the cost of securing access to adequate manufacturing capacity, our operating expenses, including legal and patent assertion costs, and general economic conditions. In addition, cash may be required for future acquisitions should we choose to pursue any. To the extent existing resources and cash from operations are insufficient to support our activities, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing. These funds may not be available when we need them, or if available, we may not be able to obtain them on terms favorable to us.

28

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

     A sensitivity analysis was performed on our investment portfolio as of June 30, 2007. This sensitivity analysis was based on a modeling technique that measures the hypothetical market value changes that would result from a parallel shift in the yield curve of plus 50, 100, or 150 basis points over a twelve-month time horizon. The following represents the potential decrease to the value of our investments given a negative shift in the yield curve used in our sensitivity analysis.

0.5%	1.0%	1.5%
$383,000	$765,000	$1,148,000

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

     Our sales are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars, and substantially all of our expenses are incurred in U.S. dollars, thus limiting our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. The effect of an immediate 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates may impact our future operating results or cash flows as any such increases in our currency exchange rate may result in increased wafer, packaging, assembly or testing costs as well as ongoing operating activities in our foreign operations. Additionally, many of our foreign distributors price our products in the local currency of the countries in which they sell. Therefore, significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to those foreign currencies could result in reduced demand or lower U.S. dollar prices for our products, which would negatively affect our operating results.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     Management is required to evaluate our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures include components of our internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. To the extent that components of our internal control over financial reporting are included within our disclosure controls and procedures, they are included in the scope of our periodic controls evaluation.

     For the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 has been made known to them on a timely basis and that such information has been properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported, as required.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

     There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the second quarter of our 2007 fiscal year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

29

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     On December 7, 2001, we and certain of our officers and directors were named as defendants along with our underwriters in a securities class action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants participated in a scheme to inflate the price of our stock in our initial public offering and in the aftermarket through a series of misstatements and omissions associated with the offering. The lawsuit is one of several hundred similar cases pending in the Southern District of New York that have been consolidated by the court. In February 2003, the District Court issued an order denying a motion to dismiss by all defendants on common issues of law. In July 2003, we, along with over 300 other issuers named as defendants, agreed to a settlement of this litigation with plaintiffs. While the parties’ request for court approval of the settlement was pending, in December 2006 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the District Court’s determination that six focus cases could be certified as class actions. In April 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing, but acknowledged that the District Court might certify a more limited class. It is not yet clear what impact, if any, the Second Circuit’s decision will have on the pending settlement. The pending settlement would not require us to pay any settlement amounts nor issue any securities. In the event that the settlement is not granted final approval, we believe that these claims are without merit and we intend to defend vigorously against them.

     We and certain of our officers were named as defendants in a securities class action captioned “Curry v. Silicon Image, Inc., Steve Tirado, and Robert Gargus,” commenced on January 31, 2005. Plaintiffs filed the action on behalf of a putative class of stockholders who purchased Silicon Image stock between October 19, 2004 and January 24, 2005. The lawsuit alleged that Silicon Image and certain of our officers and directors made alleged misstatements of material facts and violated certain provisions of Sections 20(a) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On April 27, 2005, the Court issued an order appointing lead plaintiff and approving the selection of lead counsel. On July 27, 2005 plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint (“CAC”). The CAC no longer named Mr. Gargus as an individual defendant, but added Dr. David Lee as an individual defendant. The CAC also expanded the class period from June 25, 2004 to April 22, 2005. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the CAC on September 26, 2005. Plaintiffs subsequently received leave to file, and did file, a second consolidated amended complaint (“Second CAC”) on December 8, 2005. The Second CAC extends the end of the class period from April 22, 2005 to October 13, 2005 and adds additional factual allegations under the same causes of action against Silicon Image, Mr. Tirado and Dr. Lee. The complaint also adds a new plaintiff, James D. Smallwood. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Second CAC on February 9, 2006. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss on April 10, 2006 and defendants filed a reply to plaintiffs’ opposition on May 19, 2006. On June 21, 2006 the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second CAC with leave to amend. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a third consolidated amended complaint (“Third CAC”) by the court established deadline of July 21, 2006. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Third CAC on September 1, 2006 and subsequent pleadings by the parties followed in November and December of 2006 and January of 2007. On February 23, 2007, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the Third CAC with leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Fourth CAC”) on March 30, 2007. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint on May 25, 2007. The motion is scheduled for hearing on September 7, 2007.

     On January 31, 2007, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Analogix Semiconductor, Inc. (“Analogix”), a semiconductor company based in California. The complaint charges Analogix with copyright infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets, and unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business practices. The lawsuit alleges that Analogix, without authorization and in violation of Silicon Image’s intellectual property rights, copied and used our proprietary register maps by gaining unauthorized access to Silicon Image’s proprietary and confidential information, illegally copied and modified Silicon Image’s semiconductor configuration software and knowingly and unlawfully encouraged its existing and prospective customers to modify and use Silicon Image’s semiconductor configuration software with Analogix’s chips, a use that is beyond the scope, and in violation of, the rights granted under, Silicon Image’s software license agreements. In addition to seeking monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial, we are seeking an injunction barring Analogix from misappropriation of Silicon Image’s trade secrets. On June 18, 2007, Analogix filed a counterclaim alleging Silicon Image breached a confidentiality agreement by purportedly disclosing Analogix’s confidential information within Silicon Image. A trial date has been set for September 22, 2008.

     On January 14, 2005, we received a preliminary notification that the Securities and Exchange Commission had commenced a formal investigation involving trading in our securities. On February 14, 2005, through our legal counsel, we received a formal notification of that investigation and associated subpoenas. We are fully cooperating with the SEC in this matter.

30

     During 2006, we initiated a voluntary internal review of our historical stock option compensation practices. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors reviewed and accepted management’s findings and conclusions upon the completion of the internal review. As a result of the review, we recorded a net stock-based compensation charge in the fourth quarter of 2006 in the amount of $95,000 related to options granted on two dates where we concluded that a different measurement date was appropriate. We concluded that it was not necessary to make any adjustment to any previously issued financial statements. Subsequent to our initiation of this review, we received written notice from the SEC that it was conducting an informal inquiry into the Company’s option-granting practices during the period January 1, 2004 through October 31, 2006. In May 2007, we received notice from the SEC that it had completed its investigation without recommending that any enforcement action be taken.

     In addition, we have been named as defendants in a number of judicial and administrative proceedings incidental to our business and may be named again from time to time.

     We intend to defend all of the above matters vigorously, and although adverse decisions or settlements may occur in one or more of such cases, the final resolution of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     You should carefully consider the following risk factors; in addition to those identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, together with all other information contained or incorporated by reference in this filing, before you decide to purchase shares of our common stock. These factors could cause our future results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by forward-looking statements made by us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also harm our business. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Our annual and quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly and are difficult to predict.

     Our annual and quarterly operating results are likely to vary significantly in the future based on a number of factors over which we have little or no control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

• the growth, evolution and rate of adoption of industry standards for our key markets, including CE devices, digital-ready PCs and displays, and storage devices and systems;

• our product mix is evolving and has a greater dependence on the CE market which may be more susceptible to ASP and competitive pressures than other lines of business;

• the fact that our licensing revenue is heavily dependent on a few key licensing transactions being completed for any given period, the timing of which is not always predictable and is especially susceptible to delay beyond the period in which completion is expected, and our concentrated dependence on a few licensees in any period for substantial portions of our expected licensing revenue and profits;

• the fact that our licensing revenue has been uneven and unpredictable over time, and is expected to continue to be uneven and unpredictable for the foreseeable future, resulting in considerable fluctuation in the amount of revenue recognized in a particular quarter;

• competitive pressures, such as the ability of competitors to successfully introduce products that are more cost-effective or that offer greater functionality than our products, including integration into their products of functionality offered by our products, the prices set by competitors for their products, and the potential for alliances, combinations, mergers and acquisitions among our competitors;

• average selling prices of our products, which are influenced by competition and technological advancements, among other factors;

• government regulations regarding the timing and extent to which digital content must be made available to consumers;

31

• the availability of other semiconductors or other key components that are required to produce a complete solution for the customer; usually, we supply one of many necessary components; and

• the cost of components for our products and prices charged by the third parties who manufacture, assemble and test our products.

     Because we have little or no control over these factors and/or their magnitude, our operating results are difficult to predict. Any substantial adverse change in any of these factors could negatively affect our business and results of operations.

Our future annual and quarterly operating results are highly dependent upon how well we manage our business.

     Our annual and quarterly operating results may fluctuate based on how well we manage our business. Some of these factors include the following:

• our ability to manage product introductions and transitions, develop necessary sales and marketing channels, and manage other matters necessary to enter new market segments;

• our ability to successfully manage our business in multiple markets such as CE, PC, and storage, which may involve additional research and development, marketing or other costs and expenses;

• our ability to enter into licensing deals when expected and make timely deliverables and milestones on which recognition of revenue often depends;

• our ability to engineer customer solutions that adhere to industry standards in a timely and cost-effective manner;

• our ability to achieve acceptable manufacturing yields and develop automated test programs within a reasonable time frame for our new products;

• our ability to manage joint ventures and projects, design services, and our supply chain partners;

• our ability to monitor the activities of our licensees to ensure compliance with license restrictions and remittance of royalties;

• our ability to structure our organization to enable achievement of our operating objectives and to meet the needs of our customers and markets;

• the success of the distribution and partner channels through which we choose to sell our products and

• our ability to manage expenses and inventory levels;

• our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies into our operations; and

• our ability to successfully implement our plans to transfer certain of our technology, sales administration and procurement functions offshore to be closer to customers and suppliers, lower our tax liability, and reduce certain costs.

     If we fail to effectively manage our business, this could adversely affect our results of operations.

The licensing component of our business strategy increases business risk and volatility.

     Part of our business strategy is to license certain of our technology to companies that address markets in which we do not want to directly participate. There can be no assurance that additional companies will be interested in licensing our technology on commercially favorable terms or at all. We also cannot ensure that companies who license our technology will introduce and sell products incorporating our technology, will accurately report royalties owed to us, will pay agreed upon royalties, will honor agreed upon market restrictions, will not infringe upon or misappropriate our intellectual property and will maintain the confidentiality of our proprietary information. Licensing contracts are complex and depend upon many factors including completion of milestones, allocation of values to delivered items, and customer acceptances. Many of these factors require significant judgments. Licensing revenue could fluctuate significantly from period to period because it is heavily dependent on a few key deals being completed in a

32

particular period, the timing of which is difficult to predict and may not match our expectations. Because of its high margin content, licensing revenue can have a disproportionate impact on gross profit and profitability. Also, generating revenue from licensing arrangements is a lengthy and complex process that may last beyond the period in which efforts begin, and once an agreement is in place, the timing of revenue recognition may be dependent on customer acceptance of deliverables, achievement of milestones, our ability to track and report progress on contracts, customer commercialization of the licensed technology, and other factors. Licensing that occurs in connection with actual or contemplated litigation is subject to risk that the adversarial nature of the transaction will induce non-compliance or non-payment. The accounting rules associated with recognizing revenue from licensing transactions are increasingly complex and subject to interpretation. Due to these factors, the amount of license revenue recognized in any period may differ significantly from our expectations.

We face intense competition in our markets, which may lead to reduced revenue from sales of our products and increased losses.

     The CE, PC and storage markets in which we operate are intensely competitive. These markets are characterized by rapid technological change, evolving standards, short product life cycles and declining selling prices. We expect competition for many of our products to increase, as industry standards become widely adopted and as new competitors enter our markets.

     Our products face competition from companies selling similar discrete products, and from companies selling products such as chipsets with integrated functionality. Our competitors include semiconductor companies that focus on the CE, display or storage markets, as well as major diversified semiconductor companies, and we expect that new competitors will enter our markets. Current or potential customers, including our own licensees, may also develop solutions that could compete with us, including solutions that integrate the functionality of our products into their solutions. In addition, potential OEM customers may have internal semiconductor capabilities, and may develop their own solutions for use in their products rather than purchasing them from companies such as us. Some of our competitors have already established supplier or joint development relationships with current or potential customers and may be able to leverage their existing relationships to discourage these customers from purchasing products from us or persuade them to replace our products with theirs. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater presence in key markets, better name recognition, access to larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, sales and marketing, manufacturing, distribution, technical and other resources than we do and as a result, they may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies and customer requirements, or devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products. In particular, well-established semiconductor companies, such as Analog Devices, Intel, National Semiconductor and Texas Instruments, and CE manufacturers, such as Hitachi, Matsushita, Philips, Sony, Thomson and Toshiba, may compete against us in the future. Some of our competitors could merge, which may enhance their market presence. Existing or new competitors may also develop technologies that more effectively address our markets with products that offer enhanced features and functionality, lower power requirements, greater levels of integration or lower cost. Increased competition has resulted in, and is likely to continue to result in price reductions and loss of market share in certain markets. We cannot assure you that we can compete successfully against current or potential competitors, or that competition will not reduce our revenue and gross margins.

Our success depends in part on demand for our new products.

     Our future growth depends in part on the success of our ability to develop and market more highly integrated semiconductors, such as Digital TV SoC solutions and HDTV input processors which we have recently introduced into the market and which may or may not contribute significantly to our overall CE revenue. In the storage market, our growth depends in part on market acceptance of our product offerings based on our SteelVine storage processor architecture. These products may not achieve the desired level of market acceptance in the anticipated timeframes. These products are subject to significant competition from established companies that have been selling such products for longer periods of time than Silicon Image. In the PC market, our DVI products face potential competition from emerging new standards, such DisplayPort, and from integration from larger PC semiconductor suppliers.

33

Demand for our consumer electronics products is dependent on continued adoption and widespread implementation of the HDMI specification.

     Our success in the CE market is largely dependent upon the continued adoption and widespread implementation of the HDMI specification. Demand for our products may be inhibited by unanticipated unfavorable changes in or new regulations that delay or impede the transition to digital broadcast technologies in the U.S. or abroad. Demand for our CE products may also be inhibited in the event of negative consumer experience with HDMI technology as more consumers put it into service. Transmission of audio and video from “player devices” (such as a DVD player or set-top box) to intermediary devices (such as an audio-video receiver (“AVR”)) to displays (such as an HDTV) over HDMI with HDCP represents a combination of new technologies working in concert. Cable and satellite system operators are just beginning to require transmissions of digital video with HDCP between sources and receiving devices in consumer homes, and DVD players incorporating this technology have only recently come to market. Complexities with these technologies, the interactions between content protection technologies and HDMI with HDCP, and the variability in HDMI implementations between manufacturers may cause some of these products to work incorrectly, or for the transmissions to not occur correctly, or for certain products not to be interoperable. Also, the user experience associated with audiovisual transmissions over HDMI with HDCP is unproven, and users may reject products incorporating these technologies or they may require more customer support than expected. Such occurrences could negatively impact consumer acceptance of HDMI, which could inhibit demand for our CE products. Delays or difficulties in integration of these technologies into products or failure of products incorporating this technology to achieve market acceptance could have an adverse effect on our business.

     In addition, we believe that the rate of HDMI adoption may be accelerated by FCC rules and European Information Communications and Consumer Electronics Technology Industry Associations (“EICTA”) and Cable & Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (“CASBAA”) recommendations described below.

     In the United States, the FCC issued its Plug and Play order in October 2003. In November 2003 and March 2004, these rules, known as the Plug & Play Final Rules (Plug & Play Rules), became effective. The Plug and Play Rules are relevant to DVI and HDMI with respect to high definition set-top boxes and the labeling of digital cable ready televisions. Regarding high-definition set-top boxes, the FCC stated that, as of July 1, 2005, all high definition set-top boxes acquired by cable operators for distribution to subscribers would need to include either a Digital Visual Interface (“DVI”) or High-Definition Multimedia Interface (“HDMI”) with HDCP. Regarding digital cable ready televisions, the FCC stated that a 720p or 1080i unidirectional digital cable television may not be labeled or marketed as digital cable ready unless it includes the interfaces for DVI or HDMI with HDCP according to a phase-in timetable. In the past, the FCC has made modifications to its rules and timetable for the DTV transition and it may do so in the future. We cannot predict whether these FCC rules will be amended prior to completion of the phase-in dates or that such phase-in dates will not be delayed. In addition, we cannot guarantee that the FCC will not in the future reverse these rules or adopt rules requiring or supporting different interface technologies, either of which would adversely affect our business.

     In January 2005, EICTA issued its “Conditions for High Definition Labeling of Display Devices” which requires all HDTVs using the “HD Ready” logo to have either an HDMI or DVI input with HDCP. In August 2005, EICTA issued its “Minimum Requirements for HD Television Receivers” which requires HD Receivers without an integrated display (e.g. HD STBs) utilizing the “HDTV” logo and intended for use with HD sources (e.g. television broadcasts), some of which require content protection in order to permit HD quality output, to have either a DVI or HDMI output with HDCP.

     In August 2005, CASBAA issued a series of recommendations in its “CASBAA Principles for Content Protection in the Asia-Pacific Pay-TV Industry” for handling digital output from future generations of set-top boxes for Video On Demand (“VOD”), Pay-per-view (“PPV”), Pay-TV and other encrypted digital programming applications. These recommendations include the use of one or more HDMI with HDCP or DVI with HDCP digital outputs for set-top boxes capable of outputting uncompressed high-definition content.

     With respect to the EICTA and CASBAA recommendations, we cannot predict the rate at which manufacturers will implement the HDMI-related recommendations in their products.

     In addition, the HDMI founders decided to reduce the annual license fee payable by HDMI adopters from $15,000 to $10,000 per year effective on November 1, 2006 for all adopters after that date in order to encourage more widespread adoption of HDMI. Accordingly, if there are not sufficient new adopters of HDMI to offset the reduction in the annual license fee payable per adopter, our revenues will be negatively impacted.

34

We will have difficulty selling our products if customers do not design our products into their product offerings or if our customers’ product offerings are not commercially successful.

     Our products are generally incorporated into our customers’ products at the design stage. As a result, we rely on equipment manufacturers to select our products to be designed into their products. Without these “design wins,” it becomes difficult to sell our products. We often incur significant expenditures on the development of a new product without any assurance that an equipment manufacturer will select our product for design into its own product. Additionally, in some instances, we are dependent on third parties to obtain or provide information that we need to achieve a design win. Some of these third parties may be our competitors and, accordingly, may not supply this information to us on a timely basis, if at all. Once an equipment manufacturer designs a competitor’s product into its product offering, it becomes significantly more difficult for us to sell our products to that customer because changing suppliers involves significant cost, time, effort and risk for the customer. Furthermore, even if an equipment manufacturer designs one of our products into its product offering, we cannot be assured that its product will be commercially successful or that we will receive any revenue from that product. Sales of our products largely depend on the commercial success of our customers’ products. Our customers generally can choose at any time to stop using our products if their own products are not commercially successful or for any other reason. We cannot assure you that we will continue to achieve design wins or that our customers’ equipment incorporating our products will ever be commercially successful.

Our products typically have lengthy sales cycles. A customer may decide to cancel or change its product plans, which could cause us to lose anticipated sales. In addition, our average product life cycles tend to be short and, as a result, we may hold excess or obsolete inventory that could adversely affect our operating results.

     After we have developed and delivered a product to a customer, the customer will usually test and evaluate our product prior to designing its own equipment to incorporate our product. Our customers generally need three months to over six months to test, evaluate and adopt our product and an additional three months to over nine months to begin volume production of equipment that incorporates our product. Due to this lengthy sales cycle, we may experience significant delays from the time we incur operating expenses and make investments in inventory until the time that we generate revenue from these products. It is possible that we may never generate any revenue from these products after incurring such expenditures. Even if a customer selects our product to incorporate into its equipment, we have no assurances that the customer will ultimately market and sell its equipment or that such efforts by our customer will be successful. The delays inherent in our lengthy sales cycle increase the risk that a customer will decide to cancel or change its product plans. Such a cancellation or change in plans by a customer could cause us to lose sales that we had anticipated. In addition, anticipated sales could be materially and adversely affected if a significant customer curtails, reduces or delays orders during our sales cycle or chooses not to release equipment that contains our products.

     While our sales cycles are typically long, our average product life cycles tend to be relatively short as a result of the rapidly changing technology environment in which we operate. As a result, the resources devoted to product sales and marketing may not generate material revenue for us, and from time to time, we may need to write off excess and obsolete inventory. If we incur significant marketing expenses and investments in inventory in the future that if we are not able to recover, and we are not able to compensate for those expenses, our operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, if we sell our products at reduced prices in anticipation of cost reductions but still hold higher cost products in inventory, our operating results would be harmed.

Our customer may not purchase anticipated levels of products, which can result in increased inventory levels

     We generally do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers, and, in order to accommodate the requirements of certain customers, we may from time to time build inventory that is specific to that customer in advance of receiving firm purchase orders. The short-term nature of our customers’ commitments and the rapid changes in demand for their products reduce our ability to accurately estimate the future requirements of those customers. Should the customer’s needs shift so that they no longer require such inventory, we may be left with excessive inventories, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We depend on a few key customers and the loss of any of them could significantly reduce our revenue.

     Historically, a relatively small number of customers and distributors have generated a significant portion of our revenue. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, shipments to our distributors, Innotech Corporation, Microtek, and World Peace Industrial generated 18.3%, 12.5% and 11.7% of our revenue, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, shipments to Innotech Corporation, Microtek, and World Peace Industrial all of whom are distributors, generated 16.6%, 13.2%, 10.5% of our revenue. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, shipments to Microtek, Innotech Corporation, World Peace Industrial and Weikeng Industrial, all of whom are distributors, generated 18.2%, 14.2%, 11.3% and 10.6% of our revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2006,

35

shipments to Microtek, World Peace Industrial, Innotech Corporation and Weikeng Industrial, all of whom are distributors, generated 17.3%, 14.7%, 10.8% and 10.4% of our revenue. In addition, an end-customer may buy through multiple distributors, contract manufacturers, and/or directly, which could create an even greater concentration. We cannot be certain that customers and key distributors that have accounted for significant revenue in past periods, individually or as a group, will continue to sell our products and generate revenue. As a result of this concentration of our customers, our results of operations could be negatively affected if any of the following occurs:

• one or more of our key customers, including distributors, becomes insolvent or goes out of business;

• one or more of our key customers or distributors significantly reduces, delays or cancels orders; and/or

• one or more key customers select products manufactured by one of our competitors for inclusion in their future product generations.

     Due to our participation in multiple markets, our customer base has broadened significantly and we therefore anticipate being less dependent on a relatively small number of customers to generate revenue. However, as product mix fluctuates from quarter to quarter, we may become more dependent on a small number of customers or a single customer for a significant portion of our revenue in a particular quarter, the loss of which could adversely affect our operating results.

We sell our products through distributors, which limits our direct interaction with our customers, therefore reducing our ability to forecast sales and increasing the complexity of our business.

     Many original equipment manufacturers rely on third-party manufacturers or distributors to provide inventory management and purchasing functions. Distributors generated 42.9% and 42.5% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. Distributors generated 54.6% and 56.6% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Selling through distributors reduces our ability to forecast sales and increases the complexity of our business, requiring us to:

• manage a more complex supply chain;

• monitor and manage the level of inventory of our products at each distributor;

• estimate the impact of credits, return rights, price protection and unsold inventory at distributors; and

• monitor the financial condition and credit-worthiness of our distributors, many of which are located outside of the United States, and the majority of which are not publicly traded.

     Since we have limited ability to forecast inventory levels at our end customers, it is possible that there may be significant build-up of inventories in the retail channel, with the OEM or the OEM’s contract manufacturer. Such a buildup could result in a slowdown in orders, requests for returns from customers, or requests to move out planned shipments. This could adversely impact our revenues and profits.

     Any failure to manage these challenges could disrupt or reduce sales of our products and unfavorably impact our financial results.

Our success depends on the development and introduction of new products, which we may not be able to do in a timely manner because the process of developing high-speed semiconductor products is complex and costly.

     The development of new products is highly complex, and we have experienced delays, some of which exceeded one year, in the development and introduction of new products on several occasions in the past. We have recently introduced new storage products for the consumer and small to medium-sized business markets and we expect to introduce new CE, PC and storage products in the future. As our products integrate new, more advanced functions, they become more complex and increasingly difficult to design, manufacture and debug. Successful product development and introduction depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

• accurate prediction of market requirements and evolving standards, including enhancements or modifications to existing standards such as HDMI, HDCP, DVI, SATA I and SATA II;

36

• identification of customer needs where we can apply our innovation and skills to create new standards or areas for product differentiation that improve our overall competitiveness either in an existing market or in a new market;

• development of advanced technologies and capabilities, and new products that satisfy customer requirements;

• competitors’ and customers’ integration of the functionality of our products into their products, which puts pressure on us to continue to develop and introduce new products with new functionality;

• timely completion and introduction of new product designs;

• management of product life cycles;

• use of leading-edge foundry processes and achievement of high manufacturing yields and low cost testing;

• market acceptance of new products; and

• market acceptance of storage processor architectures like SteelVine.

     Accomplishing all of this is extremely challenging, time-consuming and expensive and there is no assurance that we will succeed. Product development delays may result from unanticipated engineering complexities, changing market or competitive product requirements or specifications, difficulties in overcoming resource limitations, the inability to license third-party technology or other factors. Competitors and customers may integrate the functionality of our products into their products that would reduce demand for our products. If we are not able to develop and introduce our products successfully and in a timely manner, our costs could increase or our revenue could decrease, both of which would adversely affect our operating results. In addition, it is possible that we may experience delays in generating revenue from these products or that we may never generate revenue from these products. We must work with a semiconductor foundry and with potential customers to complete new product development and to validate manufacturing methods and processes to support volume production and potential re-work. Each of these steps may involve unanticipated difficulties, which could delay product introduction and reduce market acceptance of the product. In addition, these difficulties and the increasing complexity of our products may result in the introduction of products that contain defects or that do not perform as expected, which would harm our relationships with customers and our ability to achieve market acceptance of our new products. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve design wins for our planned new products, that we will be able to complete development of these products when anticipated, or that these products can be manufactured in commercial volumes at acceptable yields, or that any design wins will produce any revenue. Failure to develop and introduce new products, successfully and in a timely manner, may adversely affect our results of operations.

There are risks to our global strategy

     During 2006, we commenced the implementation of a global strategy that we believe will, in the long run, result in certain operational benefits as well as provide us with a lower annual effective tax rate that is lower than if we did not pursue this strategy. Our strategy involves an increased investment in technology and headcount outside of the United States in order to better align asset ownership and business functions with our expectations related to the sources, timing and amounts of future revenues and profits. As a result of undertaking these efforts, we anticipate our 2007 annual effective tax rate to approximate 55% which is materially higher than our combined statutory rates of approximately 38%. The difference between the annual effective tax rate and the combined statutory rates of 38% was due primarily to certain forecasted unbenefited foreign losses in 2007 related to the ongoing implementation of a new global business structure. The unbenefited foreign losses represent expenses for sharing in the costs of our ongoing research and development efforts as well as licensing commercial rights to exploit pre-existing intangibles to better align with customers outside the Americas. In future years, we expect to achieve operational benefits and a lower tax rate in connection with this new business structure. The expected operational benefits and lower tax rate will depend on a number of factors, including our future business results and profitability, and the effectiveness and timing of our implementation of our global strategy. While we expect declines in our annual effective tax rate after 2007, we may continue to experience higher tax rates until our new global strategy is fully operational.

37

We have made acquisitions in the past and may make acquisitions in the future, if advisable, and these acquisitions involve numerous risks.

     Our growth depends upon market growth and our ability to enhance our existing products and introduce new products on a timely basis. An acquisition of companies or intangible assets is a strategy we may use to develop new products and enter new markets. In January 2007, we completed the acquisition of sci-worx. We may acquire additional companies or technologies in the future. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including, but not limited to, the following:

• difficulty and increased costs in assimilating employees, including our possible inability to keep and retain key employees of the acquired business or challenges associated with managing employees in multiple geographic jurisdictions;

• disruption of our ongoing business;

• discovery of undisclosed liabilities of the acquired companies and legal disputes with founders or shareholders of acquired companies;

• inability to successfully incorporate acquired technology and operations into our business and maintain uniform standards, controls, policies and procedures;

• inability to commercialize acquired technology; and

• the need to take impairment charges or write-downs with respect to acquired assets.

     No assurance can be given that our prior acquisitions or our future acquisitions, if any, will be successful or provide the anticipated benefits, or that they will not adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Failure to manage growth effectively and to successfully integrate acquisitions made by us could materially harm our business and operating results.

Our acquisition of sci-worx GmbH exposes us to a variety of risks.

     We acquired sci-worx, a limited liability company based in Germany, in January 2007. In addition to the acquisition-related risks described in the risk factor above, this acquisition may expose us to complexities of operating in Germany, a country in which we have not previously had significant operations and whose regulatory framework with which we are unfamiliar, and of difficulties in managing and integrating approximately 172 employees based in Germany. In addition, the technologies acquired from sci-worx may require significant additional development before they can be marketed and may not generate sufficient revenue to offset expenses associated with the acquisition. Any of these problems or factors with respect to the acquisition of sci-worx could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Industry cycles may strain our management and resources.

     Cycles of growth and contraction in our industry may strain our management and resources. To manage these industry cycles effectively, we must:

• improve operational and financial systems;

• train and manage our employee base;

• successfully integrate operations and employees of businesses we acquire or have acquired;

• attract, develop, motivate and retain qualified personnel with relevant experience; and

• adjust spending levels according to prevailing market conditions.

     If we cannot manage industry cycles effectively, our business could be seriously harmed.

38

The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry may create constrictions in our foundry, test and assembly capacity.

     The semiconductor industry is characterized by significant downturns and wide fluctuations in supply and demand. This cyclicality has led to significant fluctuations in product demand and in the foundry, test and assembly capacity of third-party suppliers. Production capacity for fabricated semiconductors is subject to allocation, whereby not all of our production requirements would be met. This may impact our ability to meet demand and could also increase our production costs and inventory levels. Cyclicality has also accelerated decreases in average selling prices per unit. We may experience fluctuations in our future financial results because of changes in industry-wide conditions. Our financial performance has been and may in the future be, negatively impacted by downturns in the semiconductor industry. In a downturn situation, we may incur substantial losses if there is excess production capacity or excess inventory levels in the distribution channel.

39

     We depend on third-party sub-contractors to manufacture, assemble and test nearly all of our products, which reduce our control over the production process.

     We do not own or operate a semiconductor fabrication facility. We rely on third party semiconductor manufacturing companies overseas to produce the vast majority of our semiconductor products. We also rely on outside assembly and test services to test all of our semiconductor products. Our reliance on independent foundries, assembly and test facilities involves a number of significant risks, including, but not limited to:

• reduced control over delivery schedules, quality assurance, manufacturing yields and production costs;

• lack of guaranteed production capacity or product supply, potentially resulting in higher inventory levels;

• lack of availability of, or delayed access to, next-generation or key process technologies; and

• limitations on our ability to transition to alternate sources if services are unavailable from primary suppliers.

     In addition, our semiconductor products are assembled and tested by several independent subcontractors. We do not have a long-term supply agreement with all of our subcontractors, and instead obtain production services on a purchase order basis. Our outside subcontractors have no obligation to supply products to us for any specific period of time, in any specific quantity or at any specific price, except as set forth in a particular purchase order. Our requirements represent a small portion of the total production capacity of our outside foundries, assembly and test facilities and our subcontractors may reallocate capacity to other customers even during periods of high demand for our products. These foundries may allocate or move production of our products to different foundries under their control, even in different locations, which may be time consuming, costly, and difficult, have an adverse affect on quality, yields, and costs, and require us and/or our customers to re-qualify the products, which could open up design wins to competition and result in the loss of design wins and design-ins. If our subcontractors are unable or unwilling to continue manufacturing our products in the required volumes, at acceptable quality, yields and costs, and in a timely manner, our business will be substantially harmed. As a result, we would have to identify and qualify substitute contractors, which would be time-consuming, costly and difficult. This qualification process may also require significant effort by our customers, and may lead to re-qualification of parts, opening up design wins to competition, and loss of design wins and design-ins. Any of these circumstances could substantially harm our business. In addition, if competition for foundry, assembly and test capacity increases, our product costs may increase and we may be required to pay significant amounts or make significant purchase commitments to secure access to production services.

The complex nature of our production process, which can reduce yields and prevent identification of problems until well into the production cycle or, in some cases, after the product has been shipped.

     The manufacture of semiconductors is a complex process, and it is often difficult for semiconductor foundries to achieve acceptable product yields. Product yields depend on both our product design and the manufacturing process technology unique to the semiconductor foundry. Since low yields may result from either design or process difficulties, identifying problems can often only occur well into the production cycle, when an actual product exists that can be analyzed and tested.

     Further, we only test our products after they are assembled, as their high-speed nature makes earlier testing difficult and expensive. As a result, defects often are not discovered until after assembly. This could result in a substantial number of defective products being assembled and tested or shipped, thus lowering our yields and increasing our costs. These risks could result in product shortages or increased costs of assembling, testing or even replacing our products.

     Although we test our products before shipment, our products are complex and may contain defects and errors. In the past we have encountered defects and errors in our products. Because our products are sometimes integrated with products from other vendors, it can be difficult to identify the source of any particular problem. Delivery of products with defects or reliability, quality or compatibility problems, may damage our reputation and our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers. In addition, product defects and errors could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical resources, delayed product shipments, increased product returns, warranty and product liability claims against us that may not be fully covered by insurance. Any of these circumstances could substantially harm our business.

40

We face foreign business, political and economic risks because a majority of our products and our customers’ products are manufactured and sold outside of the United States.

     A substantial portion of our business is conducted outside of the United States. As a result, we are subject to foreign business, political and economic risks. Nearly all of our products are manufactured in Taiwan or elsewhere in Asia. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007, approximately 80.9% and 80.8% of our revenue, respectively was generated from customers and distributors located outside of the United States, primarily in Asia. In the three and six months ended June 30 2006, approximately 75.2% and 73.6%, respectively, of our total revenue were generated from customers and distributors located outside of the United States, primarily in Asia. We anticipate that sales outside of the United States will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenue in future periods. In addition, we undertake various sales and marketing activities through regional offices in several other countries and, with our recent acquisition of sci-worx, we have significantly expanded our research and development operations outside of the United States. We intend to continue to expand our international business activities. Accordingly, we are subject to international risks, including, but not limited to:

• political, social and economic instability;

• exposure to different business practices and legal standards, particularly with respect to intellectual property and employment;

• natural disasters and public health emergencies;

• nationalization of business and blocking of cash flows;

• trade and travel restrictions

• the imposition of governmental controls and restrictions;

• burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws;

• import and export license requirements and restrictions of the United States and each other country in which we operate;

• unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

• foreign technical standards;

• changes in taxation and tariffs;

• difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;

• fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

• difficulties in collecting receivables from foreign entities or delayed revenue recognition;

• expense and difficulties in protecting our intellectual property in foreign jurisdictions;

• exposure to possible litigation or claims in foreign jurisdictions; and

• potentially adverse tax consequences.

     Any of the factors described above may have a material adverse effect on our ability to increase or maintain our foreign sales. In addition, original equipment manufacturers that design our semiconductors into their products sell them outside of the United States. This exposes us indirectly to foreign risks. Because sales of our products are denominated exclusively in United States dollars, relative increases in the value of the United States dollar will increase the foreign currency price equivalent of our products, which could lead to a change in the competitive nature of these products in the marketplace. This in turn could lead to a reduction in sales and profits.

41

The success of our business depends upon our ability to adequately protect our intellectual property.

     We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, mask work and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary technologies. We have been issued patents and have a number of pending patent applications. However, we cannot assure you that any patents will be issued as a result of any applications or, if issued, that any claims allowed will protect our technology. In addition, we do not file patent applications on a worldwide basis, meaning we do not have patent protection in some jurisdictions. It may be possible for a third-party, including our licensees, to misappropriate our copyrighted material or trademarks. It is possible that existing or future patents may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented and effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in foreign countries. It may be possible for a third-party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology without authorization, develop similar technology independently or design around our patents in the United States and in other jurisdictions. It is also possible that some of our existing or new licensing relationships will enable other parties to use our intellectual property to compete against us. Legal actions to enforce intellectual property rights tend to be lengthy and expensive, and the outcome often is not predictable. As a result, despite our efforts and expenses, we may be unable to prevent others from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property, which could harm our business. In addition, practicality also limits our assertion of intellectual property rights. Patent litigation is expensive and its results are often unpredictable. Assertion of intellectual property rights often results in counterclaims for perceived violations of the defendant’s intellectual property rights and/or antitrust claims. Certain parties after receipt of an assertion of infringement will cut off all commercial relationships with the party making the assertion, thus making assertions against suppliers, customers, and key business partners risky. If we forgo making such claims, we may run the risk of creating legal and equitable defenses for an infringer.

Our participation in working groups for the development and promotion of industry standards in our target markets, including the DVI, and HDMI specifications, requires us to license some of our intellectual property for free or under specified terms and conditions, which may make it easier for others to compete with us in such markets.

     A key element of our business strategy includes participation in working groups to establish industry standards in our target markets, promote and enhance specifications, and develop and market products based on such specifications and future enhancements. We are a promoter of the Digital Display Working Group (“DDWG”), which published and promotes the DVI specification, a founder in the working group that develops and promotes the HDMI specification, and a promoter in the working group that develops and promotes the UDI specification. In connection with our participation in such working groups:

• we must license for free specific elements of our intellectual property to others for use in implementing the DVI specification; and we may license additional intellectual property for free as the DDWG promotes enhancements to the DVI specification.

• we must license specific elements of our intellectual property to others for use in implementing the HDMI specification and we may license additional intellectual property as the HDMI founders group promotes enhancements to the HDMI specification; and

• we have agreed to license specific elements of our intellectual property to other UDI promoters and third parties who execute an adopter’s agreement.

     Accordingly, certain companies that implement the DVI, and HDMI specifications in their products can use specific elements of our intellectual property to compete with us, in certain cases for free. Although in the case of the HDMI specification, there are annual fees and royalties associated with the adopter’s agreements, there can be no assurance that such annual fees and royalties will adequately compensate us for having to license our intellectual property. Fees and royalties received during the early years of adoption of HDMI will be used to cover costs we incur to promote the HDMI standard and to develop and perform interoperability tests; in addition, after an initial period, the HDMI founders may reallocate the royalties amongst themselves to reflect each founder’s relative contribution of intellectual property to the HDMI specification.

     We intend to continue to be involved and actively participate in other standard setting initiatives. Accordingly, we may license additional elements of our intellectual property to others for use in implementing, developing, promoting or adopting standards in our target markets, in certain circumstances at little or no cost, which may make it easier for others to compete with us in such markets. In addition, even if we receive license fees and/or royalties in connection with the licensing of our intellectual property, there can be no assurance that such license fees and/or royalties will adequately compensate us for having to license our intellectual property.

42

Our success depends in part on our relationships with Sunplus and other strategic partners.

     We have entered into strategic partnerships with third parties. In February 2007, we entered into a Video Processor Design License Agreement with Sunplus. Under the terms of the license agreement, we received a license to use and further develop advanced video processor technology. The license agreement provides for the payment of an aggregate of $40.0 million to Sunplus by Silicon Image, $35.0 million of which is payable in consideration for the licensed technology and related deliverables and $5.0 million of which is payable in consideration for Sunplus support and maintenance obligations. We paid Sunplus $10.0 million of the consideration for the licensed technology and related deliverables in February 2007, and accrued for $5 million in June 2007. We are required to pay the remaining $20.0 million upon delivery and acceptance of certain milestones. The $5.0 million to be paid for support and maintenance by Sunplus is payable over a two-year period starting upon delivery of the final Sunplus deliverables. We believe that the intellectual property licensed under this license agreement will enhance our ability to develop integrated DTV technology and other consumer product offerings. The success of the agreement depends upon our successful integration of the operations of sci-worx, which will be critical to our ability to develop products based on the Sunplus licensed IP. The success of the agreement also depends upon the continued market acceptance of our HDTV and consumer products. The achievement of milestones upon which the payments to Sunplus are contingent may also not be achieved. We may not succeed in developing successful products based on the Sunplus intellectual property.

     While these strategic partnerships are designed to drive revenue growth and adoption of our technologies and industry standards promoted by us and also reduce our research and development expenses, there is no guarantee that these strategic partnerships will be successful. Negotiating and performing under these strategic partnerships involves significant time and expense; we may not realize anticipated increases in revenue, standards adoption or cost savings; and these strategic partnerships may make it easier for the third parties to compete with us; any of which may have a negative effect our business and results of operations.

Our success depends on managing our relationship with Intel.

     Intel has a dominant role in many of the markets in which we compete, such as PCs and storage, and is a growing presence in the CE market. We have a multi-faceted relationship with Intel that is complex and requires significant management attention, including:

• Intel and Silicon Image have been parties to business cooperation agreements;

• Intel and Silicon Image are parties to a patent cross-license;

• Intel and Silicon Image worked together to develop HDCP;

• an Intel subsidiary has the exclusive right to license HDCP, of which we are a licensee;

• Intel and Silicon Image were two of the promoters of the DDWG;

• Intel and Silicon Image are two of the promoters of the Unified Display Interface Working Group;

• Intel is a promoter of the SATA working group, of which we are a contributor;

• Intel is a supplier to us and a customer for our products;

• we believe that Intel has the market presence to drive adoption of SATA by making it widely available in its chipsets and motherboards, which could affect demand for our products;

• we believe that Intel has the market presence to affect adoption of HDMI by either endorsing complementary technology or promulgating a competing standard, which could affect demand for our products;

• Intel may potentially integrate the functionality of our products, including SATA, DVI, or HDMI into its own chips and chipsets, thereby displacing demand for some of our products;

• Intel may design new technologies that would require us to re-design our products for compatibility, thus increasing our R&D expense and reducing our revenue;

43

• Intel’s technology, including its 845G chipset, may lower barriers to entry for other parties who may enter the market and compete with us; and

• Intel may enter into or continue relationships with our competitors that can put us at a relative disadvantage.

     Our cooperation and competition with Intel can lead to positive benefits, if managed effectively. If our relationship with Intel is not managed effectively, it could seriously harm our business, negatively affect our revenue, and increase our operating expenses.

We have granted Intel rights with respect to our intellectual property, which could allow Intel to develop products that compete with ours or otherwise reduce the value of our intellectual property.

     We entered into a patent cross-license agreement with Intel in which each of us granted the other a license to use the patents filed by the grantor prior to a specified date, except for identified types of products. We believe that the scope of our license to Intel excludes our current products and anticipated future products. Intel could, however, exercise its rights under this agreement to use our patents to develop and market other products that compete with ours, without payment to us. Additionally, Intel’s rights to our patents could reduce the value of our patents to any third-party who otherwise might be interested in acquiring rights to use our patents in such products. Finally, Intel could endorse competing products, including a competing digital interface, or develop its own proprietary digital interface. Any of these actions could substantially harm our business and results of operations.

We may become engaged in additional intellectual property litigation that could be time-consuming, may be expensive to prosecute or defend, and could adversely affect our ability to sell our product.

     In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States and in other jurisdictions involving patents and other intellectual property rights. This litigation is particularly prevalent in the semiconductor industry, in which a number of companies aggressively use their patent portfolios to bring infringement claims. In addition, in recent years, there has been an increase in the filing of so-called “nuisance suits,” alleging infringement of intellectual property rights. These claims may be asserted as counterclaims in response to claims made by a company alleging infringement of intellectual property rights. These suits pressure defendants into entering settlement arrangements to quickly dispose of such suits, regardless of merit. In addition, as is common in the semiconductor industry, from time to time we have been notified that we may be infringing certain patents or other intellectual property rights of others. Responding to such claims, regardless of their merit, can be time consuming, result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. As each claim is evaluated, we may consider the desirability of entering into settlement or licensing agreements. No assurance can be given that settlements will occur or that licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. In the event there is a temporary or permanent injunction entered prohibiting us from marketing or selling certain of our products, or a successful claim of infringement against us requiring us to pay damages or royalties to a third-party, and we fail to develop or license a substitute technology, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

     Any potential intellectual property litigation against us could also force us to do one or more of the following:

• stop selling products or using technology that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual property;

• attempt to obtain a license to the relevant intellectual property, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all; and

• attempt to redesign products that contain the allegedly infringing intellectual property.

     If we take any of these actions, we may be unable to manufacture and sell our products. We may be exposed to liability for monetary damages, the extent of which would be very difficult to accurately predict. In addition, we may be exposed to customer claims, for potential indemnity obligations, and to customer dissatisfaction and a discontinuance of purchases of our products while the litigation is pending. Any of these consequences could substantially harm our business and results of operations.

We have entered into, and may again be required to enter into, patent or other intellectual property cross-licenses.

     Many companies have significant patent portfolios or key specific patents, or other intellectual property in areas in which we compete. Many of these companies appear to have policies of imposing cross-licenses on other participants in their markets, which may include areas in which we compete. As a result, we have been required, either under pressure of litigation or by significant

44

vendors or customers, to enter into cross licenses or non-assertion agreements relating to patents or other intellectual property. This permits the cross-licensee, or beneficiary of a non-assertion agreement, to use certain or all of our patents and/or certain other intellectual property for free to compete with us.

We indemnify certain of our licensing customers against infringement.

     We indemnify certain of our licensing agreements customers for any expenses or liabilities resulting from third-party claims of infringements of patent, trademark, trade secret, or copyright rights by the technology we license. Certain of these indemnification provisions are perpetual from execution of the agreement and, in some instances; the maximum amount of potential future indemnification is not limited. To date, we have not paid any such claims or been required to defend any lawsuits with respect to any claim. In the event that we were required to defend any lawsuits with respect to our indemnification obligations, or to pay any claim, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We must attract and retain qualified personnel to be successful, and competition for qualified personnel is increasing in our market.

     Our success depends to a significant extent upon the continued contributions of our key management, technical and sales personnel, many of who would be difficult to replace. The loss of one or more of these employees could harm our business. Although we have entered into a limited number of employment contracts with certain executive officers, we generally do not have employment contracts with our key employees. Our success also depends on our ability to identify, attract and retain qualified technical, sales, marketing, finance and managerial personnel. Competition for qualified personnel is particularly intense in our industry and in our location. This makes it difficult to retain our key personnel and to recruit highly qualified personnel. We have experienced, and may continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining candidates with appropriate qualifications. To be successful, we need to hire candidates with appropriate qualifications and retain our key executives and employees. Replacing departing executive officers and key employees can involve organizational disruption and uncertain timing.

     The volatility of our stock price has had an impact on our ability to offer competitive equity-based incentives to current and prospective employees, thereby affecting our ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical personnel. If these adverse conditions continue, we may not be able to hire or retain highly qualified employees in the future and this could harm our business. In addition, regulations adopted by The NASDAQ Stock Market requiring shareholder approval for all stock option plans, as well as regulations adopted by the New York Stock Exchange prohibiting NYSE member organizations from giving a proxy to vote on equity compensation plans unless the beneficial owner of the shares has given voting instructions, could make it more difficult for us to grant options to employees in the future. In addition, SFAS No. 123(R), Share Based Payment, requires us to record compensation expense for options granted to employees. To the extent that new regulations make it more difficult or expensive to grant options to employees, we may incur increased cash compensation costs or find it difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees, either of which could harm our business.

We have experienced transitions in our management team, our board of directors and our independent registered public accounting firm in the past and may continue to do so in the future.

     We have experienced a number of transitions with respect to our board of directors, executive officers, and our independent registered public accounting firm in recent quarters, including the following:

• In January 2005, Steve Laub (who replaced David Lee in November 2004) resigned from the positions of chief executive officer and president and from the board of directors, Steve Tirado was appointed as chief executive officer and president and to the board as well, and Chris Paisley was appointed chairman of the board of directors.

• In February 2005, Jaime Garcia-Meza was appointed as vice president of our storage business.

• In April 2005, Robert C. Gargus retired from the position of chief financial officer and Darrel Slack was appointed as his successor.

• In April 2005, four of our then independent outside directors, David Courtney (chairman of the audit committee), Keith McAuliffe, Chris Paisley (chairman of the board) and Richard Sanquini, resigned from our board of directors and board committees.

45

• In April 2005, Darrel Slack, our then chief financial officer, was elected to our board of directors.

• In May 2005, Masood Jabbar and Peter Hanelt were elected to our board of directors.

• In June 2005, David Lee did not stand for re-election as a director at our annual meeting of stockholders, and accordingly, Dr. Lee resigned from our board of directors.

• In June 2005, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP resigned as our independent registered public accounting firm. In July 2005, we appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as our new independent registered public accounting firm.

• In August 2005, Darrel Slack began a personal leave of absence.

• In August 2005, Dale Brown resigned from the positions of chief accounting officer and corporate controller.

• In August 2005, Robert Freeman was appointed as interim chief financial officer and chief accounting officer.

• In September 2005, Darrel Slack resigned from the position of chief financial officer and from our board of directors and the board of directors of HDMI Licensing, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary.

• In October 2005, William George was elected to our board of directors.

• In October 2005, Robert Bagheri resigned from the position of executive vice president of operations.

• In October 2005, John LeMoncheck, then vice president, consumer electronics and PC/display, left Silicon Image.

• In October 2005, John Shin was appointed as interim vice president, consumer electronics and PC/display businesses and served in that position until February 2006. Mr. Shin serves as vice president of engineering, and has held that position since October 2003.

• In November 2005, Robert Freeman’s position changed from interim chief financial officer to chief financial officer.

• In December 2005, William Raduchel was elected to our board of directors.

• In January 2006, Dale Zimmerman was appointed as our vice president of worldwide marketing.

• In February 2006, John Hodge was elected to our board of directors.

• In September 2006, Patrick Reutens resigned from the position of chief legal officer.

• In January 2007, Edward Lopez was appointed as our chief legal officer.

• In February 2007, David Hodges advised our board of directors that he has decided to retire and as such will not stand for reelection to our board of directors when his current term expires at our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

• In April 2007, Robert R. Freeman, announced his intention to retire from his position as Chief Financial Officer.

• In April 2007, Rob Valiton resigned from his position as Vice President of Worldwide Sales.

• In April 2007, Sal Cobar was appointed as Vice President of Worldwide Sales.

     Such past and future transitions may continue to result in disruptions in our operations and require additional costs.

46

We have been and may continue to become the target of securities class action suits and derivative suits which could result in substantial costs and divert management attention and resources.

     Securities class action suits and derivative suits are often brought against companies, particularly technology companies, following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. Defending against these suits, even if meritless, can result in substantial costs to us and could divert the attention of our management. . Please see the descriptions of securities suits pending against us and certain of our officers and directors contained under the heading “Legal Proceedings” above

Our operations and the operations of our significant customers, third-party wafer foundries and third-party assembly and test subcontractors are located in areas susceptible to natural disasters.

     Our operations are headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area, which is susceptible to earthquakes, and the operations of CMD, which we acquired, are based in the Los Angeles area, which is also susceptible to earthquakes. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC, the outside foundry that produces the majority of our semiconductor products, is located in Taiwan. Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, or ASE, one of the subcontractors that assemble and test our semiconductor products, is also located in Taiwan. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 customers and distributors located in Japan generated 34.7% of our revenue in each period and customers and distributors located in Taiwan generated 19.9% and 18.9% of our revenue, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, customers and distributors located in Taiwan generated 20.6% and 22.6% of our revenue, respectively. Both Taiwan and Japan are susceptible to earthquakes, typhoons and other natural disasters.

     Our business would be negatively affected if any of the following occurred:

• an earthquake or other disaster in the San Francisco Bay Area or the Los Angeles area damaged our facilities or disrupted the supply of water or electricity to our headquarters or our Irvine facility;

• an earthquake, typhoon or other disaster in Taiwan or Japan resulted in shortages of water, electricity or transportation, limiting the production capacity of our outside foundries or the ability of ASE to provide assembly and test services;

• an earthquake, typhoon or other disaster in Taiwan or Japan damaged the facilities or equipment of our customers and distributors, resulting in reduced purchases of our products; or

• an earthquake, typhoon or other disaster in Taiwan or Japan disrupted the operations of suppliers to our Taiwanese or Japanese customers, outside foundries or ASE, which in turn disrupted the operations of these customers, foundries or ASE and resulted in reduced purchases of our products or shortages in our product supply.

Continued terrorist attacks or war could lead to further economic instability and adversely affect our operations, results of operations and stock price.

     The United States has taken, and continues to take, military action against terrorism and currently has troops in Iraq and in Afghanistan. In addition, the current nuclear arms crises in North Korea and Iran could escalate into armed hostilities or war. Acts of terrorism or armed hostilities may disrupt or result in instability in the general economy and financial markets and in consumer demand for OEM products that incorporate our products. Disruptions and instability in the general economy could reduce demand for our products or disrupt the operations of our customers, suppliers, distributors and contractors, many of whom are located in Asia, which would in turn adversely affect our operations and results of operations. Disruptions and instability in financial markets could adversely affect our stock price. Armed hostilities or war in South Korea could disrupt the operations of the research and development contractors we utilize there, which would adversely affect our research and development capabilities and ability to timely develop and introduce new products and product improvements.

Changes in environmental rules and regulations could increase our costs and reduce our revenue.

     Several jurisdictions have implemented rules that would require that certain products, including semiconductors, be made lead-free. All of our products are available to customers in a lead-free format. While we believe that we are generally in compliance with existing regulations, such environmental regulations are subject to change and the jurisdictions may impose additional regulations which could require us to incur costs to develop replacement products. These changes will require us to incur cost or may take time or may not always be economically or technically feasible, or may require disposal of non-compliant inventory. In addition, any requirement to dispose or abate previously sold products would require us to incur the costs of setting up and implementing such a program.

47

Provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law could prevent or delay a change in control, and may reduce the market price of our common stock.

     Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that a stockholder may consider favorable. These provisions include:

• authorizing the issuance of preferred stock without stockholder approval;

• providing for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms;

• requiring advance notice of stockholder nominations for the board of directors;

• providing the board of directors the opportunity to expand the number of directors without notice to stockholders;

• prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;

• requiring super-majority voting to amend some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws;

• limiting the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders; and

• prohibiting stockholder actions by written consent.

     Provisions of Delaware law also may discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us.

The price of our stock fluctuates substantially and may continue to do so.

     The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market valuation of many technology companies, including Silicon Image. These factors, as well as general economic and political conditions, may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock in the future. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly and may continue to fluctuate in response to a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

• actual or anticipated changes in our operating results;

• changes in expectations of our future financial performance;

• changes in market valuations of same companies in our markets;

• changes in market valuations or expectations of future financial performance of our vendors or customers;

• changes in our key executives and technical personnel; and

• announcements by us or our competitors of significant technical innovations, design wins, contracts, standards or acquisitions.

     Due to these factors, the price of our stock may decline. In addition, the stock market experiences volatility that is often unrelated to the performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may cause our stock price to decline regardless of our performance.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Total Number		Average		Total Number of Shares		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares
	of Shares		Price Paid		Purchased as Part of		that May Yet Be Purchased Under the
Period	Purchased		per Share		Publicly Announced Plans		Plan
Repurchases from May 8, 2007 through May 27, 2007		1,250	$	8.06		1,250	$	89,884
Repurchases from May 28, 2007 through June 30, 2007		2,500	$	8.38		2,500	$	68,860

     In February 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we intend, from time to time, as business conditions warrant, to purchase up to $100 million of common stock, on the open market, or in negotiated or block transactions, over a 36 month period. On May 8, 2007 and May 28, 2007, we entered into two Stock Trading Plans to facilitate our repurchases of common stock. Under the May 8, 2007 Stock Trading Plan, we authorized the repurchase of up to 1,250,000 of our common shares at prevailing market prices. Under the May 28, 2007 Stock Trading Plan, we authorized the repurchase of up to 2,500,000 of our common shares at prevailing markets. Under our stock repurchase program, we can repurchase our common stock at any time and from time to time during the 36 month period commencing February 12, 2007. From February through June 30, 2007, we repurchased a total of 3.75 million shares of our common stock at a total cost of $31.1 million.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     Not applicable.

48

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     We held our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 23, 2007. The first matter voted upon at the meeting was the election of two Class II directors to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. At the meeting, Masood Jabbar and John Hodge were elected as Class II directors, in an uncontested election, by the following vote:

			Shares		Shares		Shares		Broker
Name	Shares for		Against		Abstaining		Witheld		Non Votes
Masood Jabbar		76,399,679		—		—		3,396,706		—
John Hodge		76,640,510		—		—		3,155,875		—

     Our board of directors consists of seven members and is divided into three classes, with each class serving staggered three-year terms. The term of the Class III directors, who are currently Steve Tirado and William Raduchel, will expire at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and the term of the Class I directors, currently Peter Hanelt and William George, will expire at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

     The second matter voted upon at the meeting was the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Silicon Image’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. At the meeting, the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent accountants was ratified by the following vote:

	Shares		Shares		Shares	Broker
Shares for	Against		Abstaining		Witheld	Non Votes
79,523,348		201,847		71,190	—	—

49

Item 5. Other Information

     Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

10.01	Employment Offer Letter between Sal Cobar and the Registrant dated April 19, 2007.
10.02	Silicon Image, Inc. Sales Compensation Plan for Vice President of Worldwide Sales for Fiscal Year 2007
10.03	ESPP 1999 Plan Document including UK Sub-Plan As Amended
31.01	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.02	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.01**	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.02**	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

** This exhibit is being furnished, rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

50

Signatures

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: August 8, 2007	Silicon Image, Inc.
	/s/ Robert R Freeman
	Robert R Freeman
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

51

Exhibit Index

10.01	Employment Offer Letter between Sal Cobar and the Registrant dated April 19, 2007.
10.02	Silicon Image, Inc. Sales Compensation Plan for Vice President of Worldwide Sales for Fiscal Year 2007
10.03	ESPP 1999 Plan Document including UK Sub-Plan As Amended
31.01	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.02	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.01**	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.02**	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

** This exhibit is being furnished, rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

52

EX-10.01

EXHIBIT 10.1

April 19, 2007

Mr. Sal Cobar
1070 E. Arques Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94085

Dear Sal;

Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to confirm our offer to you your new position of Vice President, Worldwide Sales reporting to Steve Tirado starting April 23, 2007. The terms of our offer and the benefits currently provided by the Company are as follows:

1.	Your compensation will be $350,000 at target earnings and will be subject to annual review. Your base salary will be $210,000, and your sales bonus will be $140,000 at 100% of target. In addition for 2007 only, we will guarantee payment of your sales bonus for the second quarter (ending June 30) and third quarter (ending September 30) at 100% of target. Additionally, you will be eligible to participate in the regular health insurance and other employee benefit plans established by the Company for its employees from time to time.
2.	As an employee of the Company you will have access to certain Company confidential information and you may, during the course of your employment, develop certain information or inventions which will be the property of the Company. During the period that you render services to the Company, you agree to not engage in any employment, business or activity that is in any way competitive with the business or proposed business of the Company. You will disclose to the Company in writing any other gainful employment, business or activity that you are currently associated with or participate in that competes with the Company. The “Employee Inventions and Confidentiality Agreement” which you previously signed shall remain in full force during the course of your employment with the Company.
3.	We will recommend that the Board approve a grant to you, contingent on you accepting your new role as Vice President, Worldwide Sales, of stock options in the amount of 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The grant date for such grant of stock options shall be the first 15th day of the calendar month after you commence work at the Company in your new role as Vice President, Worldwide Sales, and the exercise price for such grant shall be the closing price on such grant date. Provided you continue to provide services to the Company, the stock options will become vested and exercisable with respect to 25% of the total shares granted on the 12 month anniversary date of the grant date, and thereafter on the 15th day of each succeeding month an additional 2.083% of the total shares granted under the stock option will become vested and exercisable. However, the grant of such stock options by the Company is subject to the Board’s approval and this promise to recommend such approval is not a promise of compensation, and is not intended to create any obligation on the part of the Company. Further details on the Company’s stock option plan and on any specific stock option grant to you will be provided upon approval of such stock option grant by the Board.

1060 E. Arques Avenue, Sunnyvale CA 94085 408 616 4000 www.siliconimage.com

4.	While we look forward to a long and profitable relationship, should you decide to accept our offer, you will remain an at-will employee of the Company, which means the employment relationship can be terminated by either of us for any reason or no reason, at any time and without cause or prior notice. Any statements or representations to the contrary (and, indeed, any statements contradicting any provision in this letter) should be regarded by you as ineffective. Further, your participation in any stock option or benefit program is not to be regarded as assuring you of continuing employment for any particular period of time. The at-will nature of your employment with the Company may only be changed in a written agreement signed by the Company’s CEO.
5.	You and the Company agree to submit to mandatory and exclusive binding arbitration any controversy or claim arising out of, or relating to, this Agreement or any breach hereof, provided, however, that the parties retain their right to, and shall not be prohibited, limited or in any other way restricted from, seeking or obtaining injunctive relief from a court having jurisdiction over the parties for any alleged violation of the Employee Invention Assignment and Confidentiality Agreement. Such arbitration shall be conducted through JAMS in the State of California, Santa Clara County, before a single arbitrator, in accordance with the JAMS Employment Arbitration Rules and Procedures in effect at that time. The arbitrator must decide all disputes in accordance with California law and shall have power to decide all matters, including arbitrability. You will bear only those costs of arbitration you would otherwise bear had you brought a covered claim in court. When the arbitrator has issued a decision, judgment on that decision may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. We each understand and agree that we are waiving a trial by jury. However, this arbitration provision shall not affect your right to file an administrative claim before any government agency where, as a matter of law, the parties may not restrict the Employee’s ability to file an administrative claim with said agency (by way of example, claims before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the National Labor Relations Board). Otherwise, the parties agree that arbitration shall be the exclusive remedy for administrative claims.
6.	This offer will remain valid until Friday, April 20, 2007. If you decide to accept our offer please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space indicated and return it to the Human Resource department. Your signature will acknowledge that you have read and understood and agreed to the terms and conditions of this offer. Should you have anything else that you wish to discuss, please do not hesitate to call.

     Sal, we look forward to our continued working relationship with you at Silicon Image, Inc. in your new role.

Sincerely,
Silicon Image, Inc
 

 

Doug Haslam
Vice President Human Resources 

My signature below indicates acceptance of the terms and conditions of this offer and acknowledgement that I have read and understood the terms and conditions of this offer. I further acknowledge that no other commitments or representations were made to me as part of my employment offer except as specifically set forth herein.

	4/20/07
Sal Cobar	Date

EX-10.02

EXHIBIT 10.2

SALES COMPENSATION PLAN

SALES COMPENSATION PLAN FOR VICE PRESIDENT OF WORLDWIDE SALES

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007

     The current Vice President of Worldwide Sales (the “VP of Worldwide Sales”) of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive a cash payment based on the percentage of achievement of the quota goal for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, as set forth in the table below.

Percent
Achievement of	Amount of Cash		Percent of Incentive
Planned Revenue	Incentive Payment		Target Amount
70%	$	98,000		70.00	%
75%	$	105,000		75.00	%
80%	$	112,000		80.00	%
85%	$	119,000		85.00	%
90%	$	126,000		90.00	%
95%	$	133,000		95.00	%
100%	$	140,000		100.00	%
105%	$	176,250		125.89	%
110%	$	234,250		167.32	%
115%	$	306,750		219.11	%
120%	$	379,250		270.89	%
125%	$	451,750		322.68	%
130%	$	524,250		374.46	%
135%	$	596,750		426.25	%
140%	$	669,250		478.04	%
145%	$	741,750		529.82	%
150%	$	814,250		581.61	%

No amounts are payable if the VP of Worldwide Sales achieves less than seventy percent (70%) of his quota goal. A cash incentive payment in the amount of $98,000 is payable to the VP of Worldwide Sales upon achievement of seventy percent (70%) of his quota goal. An incremental cash incentive payment is payable to the VP of Worldwide Sales in the amount of $1,400 for each incremental percentage point of his quota goal achieved between seventy one percent (71%) and one hundred percent (100%). Thereafter, an incremental cash incentive payment is payable in the amount of $7,250 for each incremental percentage point of his quota goal achieved between one hundred one percent (101%) and one hundred seven percent (107%). An incremental cash incentive payment is payable in the amount of $14,500 for each incremental percentage point of his quota goal achieved over one hundred seven percent (107%). The amount of cash incentive payment payable under this Plan is not capped. Actual amounts between the percentage point shown in the table above will be calculated on pro-rata basis.

For 2007 only, the company is guaranteeing minimum cash payments to the VP of Worldwide Sales for the second quarter (three month period ending June 30) and third quarter (three month period ending September 30) assuming achievement of one hundred percent (100%) of the quota goals for such periods; provided, however, that the cash payment for the second quarter will be prorated beginning April 23, 2007 (the date that the VP of Worldwide Sales assumed the position) thru the end of the second quarter. The fourth quarter (period ending December 31) will be paid based on actual results.

EX-10.03

Exhibit 10.3

SILICON IMAGE, INC.
1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

As Amended and Restated on June 12, 2007

     1. Establishment of Plan. Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) proposes to grant options for purchase of the Company’s Common Stock to eligible employees of the Company and its Participating Subsidiaries (as hereinafter defined) pursuant to this Employee Stock Purchase Plan (this “Plan”). For purposes of this Plan, “Parent Corporation” and “Subsidiary” shall have the same meanings as “parent corporation” and “subsidiary corporation” in Sections 424(e) and 424(f), respectively, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). “Participating Subsidiaries” are Parent Corporations or Subsidiaries that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) designates from time to time as corporations that shall participate in this Plan. The Company intends this Plan to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Code (including any amendments to or replacements of such Section (“Section 423”)), and this Plan shall be so construed. Any term not expressly defined in this Plan but defined for purposes of Section 423 shall have the same definition herein. A total of 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock is initially reserved for issuance under this Plan (after giving effect to the 2:1 stock split of August 18, 2000). In addition, on each January 1, the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan shall be increased automatically by a number of shares equal to 1% of the total number of outstanding shares of the Company Common Stock on the immediately preceding December 31; provided, that the Board or the Committee may in its sole discretion reduce the amount of the increase in any particular year; and, provided further, that the aggregate number of shares issued over the term of this Plan shall not exceed 8,000,000 shares (after giving effect to the 2:1 stock split of August 18, 2000). Such number shall be subject to adjustments effected in accordance with Section 14 of this Plan.

     2. Purpose. The purpose of this Plan is to provide eligible employees of the Company and Participating Subsidiaries with a convenient means of acquiring an equity interest in the Company through payroll deductions, to enhance such employees’ sense of participation in the affairs of the Company and Participating Subsidiaries, and to provide an incentive for continued employment.

     3. Administration. This Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”). Subject to the provisions of this Plan and the limitations of Section 423 or any successor provision in the Code, all questions of interpretation or application of this Plan shall be determined by the Committee and its decisions shall be final and binding upon all participants. Members of the Committee shall receive no compensation for their services in connection with the administration of this Plan, other than standard fees as established from time to time by the Board for services rendered by Board members serving on Board committees. All expenses incurred in connection with the administration of this Plan shall be paid by the Company.

     4. Eligibility. Any employee of the Company or the Participating Subsidiaries is eligible to participate in an Offering Period (as hereinafter defined) under this Plan except the following:

          (a) employees who are not employed by the Company or a Participating Subsidiary (10) days before the beginning of such Offering Period;

          (b) employees who are customarily employed for twenty (20) hours or less per week;

          (c) employees who are customarily employed for five (5) months or less in a calendar year;

          (d) employees who, together with any other person whose stock would be attributed to such employee pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code, own stock or hold options to purchase stock possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its Participating Subsidiaries or who, as a result of being granted an option under this Plan with respect to such Offering Period, would own stock or hold options to purchase stock possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its Participating Subsidiaries; and

Silicon Image, Inc.
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

          (e) individuals who provide services to the Company or any of its Participating Subsidiaries as independent contractors who are reclassified as common law employees for any reason except for federal income and employment tax purposes.

     5. Offering Dates. The offering periods of this Plan (each, an “Offering Period”) shall be of approximately six (6) months duration. The first such Offering Period shall commence on August 1, 2007, and end on the last business day to occur on or before February 15, 2008, and subsequent Offering Periods shall commence on each February 16 and August 16 thereafter. Each Offering Period shall consist of a single purchase period (a “Purchase Period”) during which payroll deductions of the participants are accumulated under this Plan. The first business day of each Offering Period is referred to as the “Offering Date”. The last business day of each Offering Period is referred to as the “Purchase Date” and is the end of the Purchase Period. The Committee shall have the power to change the duration of Offering Periods with respect to offerings without stockholder approval if such change is announced at least fifteen (15) days prior to the scheduled beginning of the first Offering Period to be affected.

     6. Participation in this Plan. Eligible employees may become participants in an Offering Period under this Plan on the first Offering Date after satisfying the eligibility requirements by delivering a subscription agreement to the Company not later than five (5) days before such Offering Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may set a later time for filing the subscription agreement authorizing payroll deductions for all eligible employees with respect to a given Offering Period. An eligible employee who does not deliver a subscription agreement to the Company by such date after becoming eligible to participate in such Offering Period shall not participate in that Offering Period or any subsequent Offering Period unless such employee enrolls in this Plan by filing a subscription agreement with the Company not later than five (5) days preceding a subsequent Offering Date. Once an employee becomes a participant in an Offering Period, such employee will automatically participate in the Offering Period commencing immediately following the last day of the prior Offering Period and is not required to file another subscription agreement to continue participation in this Plan other than following a withdrawal from participation as set forth in Section 11 below.

     7. Grant of Option on Enrollment. Enrollment by an eligible employee in this Plan with respect to an Offering Period will constitute the grant (as of the Offering Date) by the Company to such employee of an option to purchase on the Purchase Date up to that number of shares of Common Stock of the Company determined by dividing (a) the amount accumulated in such employee’s payroll deduction account during such Offering Period by (b) the lower of (i) eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock on the Offering Date (but in no event less than the par value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock), or (ii) eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock on the Purchase Date (but in no event less than the par value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock), provided, however, that the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock subject to any option granted pursuant to this Plan shall not exceed the lesser of (x) the maximum number of shares set by the Committee pursuant to Section 10(c) below with respect to the applicable Purchase Date, or (y) the maximum number of shares which may be purchased pursuant to Section 10(b) below with respect to the applicable Purchase Date. The fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock shall be determined as provided in Section 8 below.

     8. Purchase Price. The purchase price per share at which a share of Common Stock will be sold in any Offering Period shall be eighty-five percent (85%) of the lesser of:

          (a) The fair market value on the Offering Date; or

          (b) The fair market value on the Purchase Date.

          For purposes of this Plan, the term “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock determined as follows:

(a) if such Common Stock is publicly traded and is then listed on a national securities exchange, its closing price on the date of determination on the principal national securities

Silicon Image, Inc.
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

	exchange on which the Common Stock is listed or admitted to trading as reported by The Wall Street Journal or other source designated by the Board or Committee;
(b)	if such Common Stock is publicly traded but is not listed or admitted to trading on a national securities exchange, the average of the closing bid and asked prices on the date of determination as reported in The Wall Street Journal or other source designated by the Board or Committee; or
(c)	if none of the foregoing is applicable, by the Board or Committee in good faith.

     9. Payment Of Purchase Price; Changes In Payroll Deductions; Issuance Of Shares.

          (a) The purchase price of the shares is accumulated by regular payroll deductions made during each Offering Period. The deductions are made as a percentage of the participant’s compensation in one percent (1%) increments not less than one percent (1%), nor greater than fifteen percent (15%) or such lower limit set by the Committee. Compensation shall mean all W-2 cash compensation, including, but not limited to, base salary, wages, commissions, overtime, shift premiums and bonuses, plus draws against commissions, provided, however, that for purposes of determining a participant’s compensation, any election by such participant to reduce his or her regular cash remuneration under Sections 125 or 401(k) of the Code shall be treated as if the participant did not make such election. Payroll deductions shall commence on the first payday of the Offering Period and shall continue to the end of the Offering Period unless sooner altered or terminated as provided in this Plan.

          (b) A participant may prospectively increase or decrease the rate of payroll deductions for any upcoming Offering Period by filing with the Company a new authorization for payroll deductions not later than fifteen (15) days before the beginning of such Offering Period.

          (c) A participant may decrease, but not increase, his or her payroll deduction percentage (including to zero) during a Purchase Period by filing with the Company a new authorization regarding upcoming payroll deductions. Such decrease shall be effective beginning with the next payroll period commencing more than fifteen (15) days after the Company’s receipt of the request. Only one such change may be made effective during any Purchase Period.

          (d) All payroll deductions made for a participant are credited to his or her account under this Plan and are deposited with the general funds of the Company. No interest accrues on the payroll deductions. All payroll deductions received or held by the Company may be used by the Company for any corporate purpose, and the Company shall not be obligated to segregate such payroll deductions.

          (e) On each Purchase Date, so long as this Plan remains in effect, and provided that the participant has not timely submitted a signed and completed withdrawal form before that date as provided in Section 11 below, the Company shall apply the funds then in the participant’s account to the purchase of whole shares of Common Stock reserved under the option granted to such participant with respect to the Offering Period to the extent that such option is exercisable on the Purchase Date. The purchase price per share shall be as specified in Section 8 of this Plan. Any cash remaining in a participant’s account after such purchase of shares shall be refunded to such participant in cash, without interest; provided, however that any amount remaining in such participant’s account on a Purchase Date which is less than the amount necessary to purchase a full share of Common Stock of the Company shall be carried forward, without interest, into the next Offering Period. In the event that this Plan has been oversubscribed, all funds not used to purchase shares on the Purchase Date shall be returned to the participant, without interest. No Common Stock shall be purchased on a Purchase Date on behalf of any employee whose participation in this Plan has terminated prior to such Purchase Date.

          (f) As promptly as practicable after the Purchase Date, the Company shall issue shares for the participant’s benefit representing the shares purchased upon exercise of his or her option.

Silicon Image, Inc.
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

          (g) A participant’s option to purchase shares hereunder is exercisable only by him or her. The participant will have no interest or voting right in shares covered by his or her option until such option has been exercised.

     10. Limitations on Shares to be Purchased.

          (a) No participant shall be entitled to purchase stock under this Plan at a rate which, when aggregated with his or her rights to purchase stock under all other employee stock purchase plans of the Company or any Subsidiary, exceeds $25,000 in fair market value, determined as of the Offering Date (or such other limit as may be imposed by the Code) for each calendar year in which the employee participates in this Plan. The Company shall automatically suspend the payroll deductions of any participant as necessary to enforce such limit provided that when the Company automatically resumes such payroll deductions, the Company must apply the rate in effect immediately prior to such suspension.

          (b) No more than two hundred percent (200%) of the number of shares determined by using eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock on the Offering Date as the denominator may be purchased by a participant on any single Purchase Date.

          (c) No participant shall be entitled to purchase more than the Maximum Share Amount (as defined below) on any single Purchase Date. Not less than thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of any Offering Period, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, set a maximum number of shares which may be purchased by any employee at any single Purchase Date (hereinafter the “Maximum Share Amount”). Until otherwise determined by the Committee, there shall be no Maximum Share Amount. In no event shall the Maximum Share Amount exceed the amounts permitted under Section 10(b) above. If a new Maximum Share Amount is set, then all participants must be notified of such Maximum Share Amount prior to the commencement of the next Offering Period. The Maximum Share Amount shall continue to apply with respect to all succeeding Purchase Dates and Offering Periods unless revised by the Committee as set forth above.

          (d) If the number of shares to be purchased on a Purchase Date by all employees participating in this Plan exceeds the number of shares then available for issuance under this Plan, then the Company will make a pro rata allocation of the remaining shares in as uniform a manner as shall be reasonably practicable and as the Committee shall determine to be equitable. In such event, the Company shall give written notice of such reduction of the number of shares to be purchased under a participant’s option to each participant affected.

          (e) Any payroll deductions accumulated in a participant’s account which are not used to purchase stock due to the limitations in this Section 10 shall be returned to the participant as soon as practicable after the end of the applicable Offering Period, without interest.

     11. Withdrawal.

          (a) Each participant may withdraw from an Offering Period under this Plan by signing and delivering to the Company a written notice to that effect on a form provided for such purpose. Such withdrawal may be elected at any time at least fifteen (15) days prior to the end of an Offering Period.

          (b) Upon withdrawal from this Plan, the accumulated payroll deductions shall be returned to the withdrawn participant, without interest, and his or her interest in this Plan shall terminate. In the event a participant voluntarily elects to withdraw from this Plan, he or she may not resume his or her participation in this Plan during the same Offering Period, but he or she may participate in any Offering Period under this Plan which commences on a date subsequent to such withdrawal by filing a new authorization for payroll deductions in the same manner as set forth in Section 6 above for initial participation in this Plan.

     12. Termination of Employment. Termination of a participant’s employment for any reason, including retirement, death or the failure of a participant to remain an eligible employee of the Company or of a Participating Subsidiary, immediately terminates his or her participation in this Plan. In such event, the payroll deductions credited to the participant’s account will be returned to him or her or, in the case of his or her death, to his or her

Silicon Image, Inc.
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

legal representative, without interest. For purposes of this Section 12, an employee will not be deemed to have terminated employment or failed to remain in the continuous employ of the Company or of a Participating Subsidiary in the case of sick leave, military leave, or any other leave of absence approved by the Board; provided that such leave is for a period of not more than ninety (90) days or reemployment upon the expiration of such leave is guaranteed by contract or statute.

     13. Return of Payroll Deductions. In the event a participant’s interest in this Plan is terminated by withdrawal, termination of employment or otherwise, or in the event this Plan is terminated by the Board, the Company shall deliver to the participant all payroll deductions credited to such participant’s account. No interest shall accrue on the payroll deductions of a participant in this Plan.

     14. Capital Changes. Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each option under this Plan which has not yet been exercised and the number of shares of Common Stock which have been authorized for issuance under this Plan but have not yet been placed under option (collectively, the “Reserves”), as well as the price per share of Common Stock covered by each option under this Plan which has not yet been exercised, shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company resulting from a stock split or the payment of a stock dividend (but only on the Common Stock) or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of any consideration by the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration”. Such adjustment shall be made by the Committee, whose determination shall be final, binding and conclusive. Except as expressly provided herein, no issue by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of shares of Common Stock subject to an option.

     In the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Offering Period will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed action, unless otherwise provided by the Committee. The Committee may, in the exercise of its sole discretion in such instances, declare that this Plan shall terminate as of a date fixed by the Committee and give each participant the right to purchase shares under this Plan prior to such termination or return each participant’s funds on deposit without interest. In the event of (i) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving corporation (other than a merger or consolidation with a wholly-owned subsidiary, a reincorporation of the Company in a different jurisdiction, or other transaction in which there is no substantial change in the stockholders of the Company or their relative stock holdings and the options under this Plan are assumed, converted or replaced by the successor corporation, which assumption will be binding on all participants), (ii) a merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation but after which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such merger (other than any stockholder that merges, or which owns or controls another corporation that merges, with the Company in such merger) cease to own their shares or other equity interest in the Company, (iii) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or (iv) the acquisition, sale, or transfer of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Company by tender offer or similar transaction, the Plan shall terminate as of a date fixed by the Committee and the date of such termination shall be the final Purchase Date for all Offering Periods then in effect.

     The Committee may, if it so determines in the exercise of its sole discretion, also make provision for adjusting the Reserves, as well as the price per share of Common Stock covered by each outstanding option, in the event that the Company effects one or more reorganizations, recapitalizations, rights offerings or other increases or reductions of shares of its outstanding Common Stock, or in the event of the Company being consolidated with or merged into any other corporation.

     15. Nonassignability. Neither payroll deductions credited to a participant’s account nor any rights with regard to the exercise of an option or to receive shares under this Plan may be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of in any way (other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or as provided in Section 22 below) by the participant. Any such attempt at assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition shall be void and without effect.

Silicon Image, Inc.
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

     16. Reports. Individual accounts will be maintained for each participant in this Plan. Each participant shall receive promptly after the end of each Offering Period a report of his or her account setting forth the total payroll deductions accumulated, the number of shares purchased, the per share price thereof and the remaining cash balance, if any, carried forward to the next Offering Period.

     17. Notice of Disposition. Each participant shall notify the Company in writing if the participant disposes of any of the shares purchased in any Offering Period pursuant to this Plan if such disposition occurs within two (2) years from the Offering Date (the “Notice Period”). The Company may, at any time during the Notice Period, place a legend or legends on any certificate representing shares acquired pursuant to this Plan requesting the Company’s transfer agent to notify the Company of any transfer of the shares. The obligation of the participant to provide such notice shall continue notwithstanding the placement of any such legend on the certificates.

     18. No Rights to Continued Employment. Neither this Plan nor the grant of any option hereunder shall confer any right on any employee to remain in the employ of the Company or any Participating Subsidiary, or restrict the right of the Company or any Participating Subsidiary to terminate such employee’s employment.

     19. Equal Rights And Privileges. All eligible employees shall have equal rights and privileges with respect to this Plan so that this Plan qualifies as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 or any successor provision of the Code and the related regulations. Any provision of this Plan which is inconsistent with Section 423 or any successor provision of the Code shall, without further act or amendment by the Company, the Committee or the Board, be reformed to comply with the requirements of Section 423. This Section 19 shall take precedence over all other provisions in this Plan.

     20. Notices. All notices or other communications by a participant to the Company under or in connection with this Plan shall be deemed to have been duly given when received in the form specified by the Company at the location, or by the person, designated by the Company for the receipt thereof.

     21. Term; Stockholder Approval. This Plan was first adopted by the Board on July 20, 1999 and was last amended by the Board as of the date shown above. When required by applicable law or Section 423, this Plan shall be submitted for approval by the stockholders of the Company, in any manner required, or permitted, by applicable law. No purchase of shares that are subject to such approval before becoming available under this Plan shall occur prior to stockholder approval of such shares and the Board or Committee may delay any Purchase Date and postpone the commencement of any Offering Period subsequent to such Purchase Date as deemed necessary or desirable to obtain such approval (provided that if a Purchase Date would occur more than twenty-seven (27) months after commencement of the Offering Period to which it relates, then such Purchase Date shall not occur and instead such Offering Period shall terminate without the purchase of shares and participants in such Offering Period shall be refunded their contributions without interest). This Plan shall continue until the earlier to occur of (a) termination of this Plan by the Board (which termination may be effected by the Board at any time), (b) issuance of all of the shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under this Plan, or (c) ten (10) years from the adoption of this Plan by the Board.

     22. Designation of Beneficiary.

          (a) A participant may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any shares and cash, if any, from the participant’s account under this Plan in the event of such participant’s death subsequent to the end of a Purchase Period but prior to delivery to him of such shares and cash. In addition, a participant may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any cash from the participant’s account under this Plan in the event of such participant’s death prior to a Purchase Date.

          (b) Such designation of beneficiary may be changed by the participant at any time by written notice. In the event of the death of a participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated under this Plan who is living at the time of such participant’s death, the Company shall deliver such shares or cash to the executor or administrator of the estate of the participant, or if no such executor or administrator has been appointed (to the knowledge of the Company), the Company, in its discretion, may deliver such shares or cash to the spouse or

Silicon Image, Inc.
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

to any one or more dependents or relatives of the participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known to the Company, then to such other person as the Company may designate.

     23. Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares; Limitation on Sale of Shares. Shares shall not be issued with respect to an option unless the exercise of such option and the issuance and delivery of such shares pursuant thereto shall comply with all applicable provisions of law, domestic or foreign, including, without limitation, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the requirements of any stock exchange or automated quotation system upon which the shares may then be listed, and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.

     24. Applicable Law. The Plan shall be governed by the substantive laws (excluding the conflict of laws rules) of the State of California.

     25. Amendment or Termination of this Plan. The Board may at any time amend, terminate or extend the term of this Plan, except that any such termination cannot affect options previously granted under this Plan, nor may any amendment make any change in an option previously granted which would adversely affect the right of any participant, nor may any amendment be made without approval of the stockholders of the Company obtained in accordance with Section 21 above within twelve (12) months of the adoption of such amendment (or earlier if required by Section 21) if such amendment would:

     (a) increase the number of shares that may be issued under this Plan; or

     (b) change the designation of the employees (or class of employees) eligible for participation in this Plan.

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may make such amendments to the Plan as the Board determines to be advisable, if the continuation of the Plan or any Offering Period would result in financial accounting treatment for the Plan that is different from the financial accounting treatment in effect on the date this Plan was adopted by the Board.

THE SILICON IMAGE, INC.

1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

SUB-PLAN FOR UK EMPLOYEES

1.	The purpose of this Sub-Plan is to provide incentive for present and future employees in the United Kingdom of Silicon Image’s Subsidiaries through the grant of options over Common Stock.
2.	This Sub-Plan is governed by the Silicon Image, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) and all its provisions shall be identical to those of the Plan SAVE THAT Section 4 shall be as stated in this Sub-Plan in order to accommodate the specific requirements of UK law.

Section 4 for purposes of this Sub-Plan reads:

     4. Eligibility. Any employee of the Participating Subsidiaries is eligible to participate in an Offering Period (as hereinafter defined) under this Plan except the following:

          (a) employees who are not employed by the Company or a Participating Subsidiary (10) days before the beginning of such Offering Period;

          (b) employees who are customarily employed for five (5) months or less in a calendar year;

          (c) employees who, together with any other person whose stock would be attributed to such employee pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code, own stock or hold options to purchase stock possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its Participating Subsidiaries or who, as a result of being granted an option under this Plan with respect to such Offering Period, would own stock or hold options to purchase stock possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its Participating Subsidiaries; and

          (d) individuals who provide services to the Company or any of its Participating Subsidiaries as independent contractors who are reclassified as common law employees for any reason except for federal income and employment tax purposes.

EX-31.01

Exhibit 31.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Steve Tirado, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silicon Image, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2007	/s/ Steve Tirado
	Steve Tirado
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.02

Exhibit 31.02

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert Freeman, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silicon Image, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2007	/s/ Robert R. Freeman
	Robert Freeman
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.01

Exhibit 32.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steve Tirado, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 8, 2007	/s/ Steve Tirado
	Steve Tirado
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.02

Exhibit 32.02

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert Freeman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 8, 2007	/s/ Robert R. Freeman
	Robert Freeman
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.