XML 36 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies
 
Operating Leases
 
The Company has various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2018. These leases require the Company to pay property taxes, maintenance and other costs.
   
The following table summarizes rental expense and rental income from operating leases for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
 
 
 
Reported through
General and Administrative
 
Reported through
Discontinued Operations
 
 
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
Rental expense
 
$
(1,036)
 
$
(1,122)
 
$
(492)
 
$
(738)
 
Rental income
 
 
665
 
 
791
 
 
492
 
 
738
 
Net rental expense
 
$
(371)
 
$
(331)
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
The following table summarizes the future minimum rental commitments on non-cancelable operating leases at
June 30, 2013:
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
2013
 
$
912
 
2014
 
 
1,182
 
2015
 
 
1,147
 
2016
 
 
677
 
2017
 
 
109
 
2018
 
 
41
 
Total minimum future rental commitments
 
$
4,068
 
 
At June 30, 2013, the Company expects to receive $2.1 million in future rental payments from non-cancelable subleases, which is not netted against the commitments above.
 
Litigation
 
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are named as defendants in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. These proceedings may include claims for substantial or indeterminate compensatory or punitive damages, or for injunctive relief.
 
The Company establishes reserves for litigation matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Once established, reserves may be adjusted when new information is obtained.
 
It is the opinion of the Company’s management that adequate provisions have been made for losses with respect to litigation matters and other claims that existed at June 30, 2013. Management believes the ultimate resolution of these matters is not likely to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Assessment of the potential outcomes of these matters involves significant judgment and is subject to change, based on future developments, which could result in significant changes.
 
Shareholder Matters
 
The Company is a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit and two derivative suits originally filed in 2008. The plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit claim to represent a class of investors in the Company’s shares who allegedly were injured by misstatements in press releases and SEC filings between May 3, 2004, and January 28, 2008.  The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages for themselves and the shareholders of the class they purport to represent.  In the derivative suits, the plaintiffs claim, among other things, that the Company was injured because its directors and certain named officers did not fulfill duties regarding the accuracy of its financial disclosures.  Both the class action and the derivative cases are pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the class action and in June 2012, the Court issued a ruling dismissing all of the counts alleging any knowing or intentional wrongdoing by the Company or its affiliates, directors and officers. The only remaining counts relate to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. Plaintiffs have appealed the Court’s ruling. As of June 30, 2013, based on the Company’s exposure under the remaining counts, the Company believes it is probable that it will settle this case for $0.5 million or less and as such the Company has a contingent obligation for $0.5 million (reported through “Other liabilities”). If the plaintiffs are successful on appeal, then it is possible that the Company could incur additional losses, which could be significant; however, these losses cannot be estimated at this time. The Company expects any settlement and any other future losses related to this case (including the $0.5 million, mentioned above) to be covered by insurance proceeds.