XML 37 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:  
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:

NOTE 15-DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:

 

As part of its risk management policy, the Company occasionally uses derivative instruments to (i) safeguard the corporate assets; (ii) insure the value of its future revenue stream, and (iii) lessen the impact of unforeseen market swings of its sales revenues.  To comply with these objectives the Company, from time to time, enters into commodities prices derivatives, interest rate derivative, exchange rate derivative and other instruments.  The Company does not enter into derivative contracts unless it anticipates a future activity that is likely to occur that will result in exposing the Company to market risk.

 

Copper hedges:

 

In 2011, the Company entered into copper swaps and zero cost collar derivative contracts to reduce price volatility and to protect its sales value as shown below. These transactions meet the requirements of hedge accounting.  The realized gains and losses from these derivatives were recorded in net sales on the consolidated statement of earnings and included in operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

The following table summarizes the copper derivative activity related to copper sales transactions realized in 2012 and 2011:

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Zero cost collar contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

Pounds (in millions)

 

46.3

 

423.3

 

Average LME cap price

 

$

5.18

 

$

3.63

 

Average LME floor price

 

$

3.50

 

$

2.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swap contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

Pounds (in millions)

 

 

390.8

 

Weighted average COMEX price

 

 

$

3.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized gain (loss) on copper derivatives

 

 

$

13.5

 

 

The hedge instruments are based on LME copper prices.  The Company performed statistical analysis on the difference between the average monthly copper price on the LME and the COMEX exchanges and determined that the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.999.  Based on this analysis the Company considers that the LME underlying price matches its sales priced at COMEX prices.  These cash flow hedge relationships qualify as critical matched terms hedge relationships and as a result have no ineffectiveness.  The Company performs periodic quantitative assessments to confirm that the relationship was highly effective and that the ineffectiveness was de minimis.

 

As of December 31, 2012, the Company did not hold copper derivative contracts.

 

Transactions under these metal price protection programs are accounted for as cash flow hedges under ASC 815-30 “Derivatives and Hedging-Cash Flow Hedges” as they meet the requirements for this treatment and are adjusted to fair market value based on the metal prices as of the last day of the respective reporting period with the gain or loss recorded in other comprehensive income until settlement, at which time the gain or loss is reclassified to net sales in the consolidated statements of earnings.

 

Please see additional disclosure about fair value on Note 16-”Financial instruments” below.