XML 57 R5.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”).  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

 

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year.  For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.

 

Management Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses reported in those financial statements.  Certain significant accounting policies that contain subjective management estimates and assumptions include those related to revenue recognition, inventory, pension and other post-retirement benefit costs, goodwill, other intangible assets and long-lived assets, income taxes and derivatives.  Descriptions of these policies are discussed in the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.  Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, and makes adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate.  As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions.  Significant changes, if any, in those estimates and assumptions resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements in future periods.

 

Currency Translation and Transactions

 

All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates are translated at period-end rates of exchange, while revenue and expenses are translated at weighted average rates of exchange for the period.  Unrealized translation gains or losses are reported as cumulative translation adjustments through other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”).  Such adjustments, attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., amounted to $113.3 million of unrealized translation losses, net of tax, and $86.7 million of unrealized translation gains, net of tax, during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  For the Company’s Venezuelan subsidiary operating in a highly inflationary economy, the U.S. dollar is the functional currency.  Remeasurement adjustments in financial statements in a highly inflationary economy and other transactional gains and losses are reflected in earnings.

 

The accompanying consolidated statements of earnings include net exchange gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions of $(9.8) million and $2.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Accounts Receivable

 

Accounts receivable is stated net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer deductions totaling $33.9 million as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

 

The Company is a worldwide manufacturer, marketer and distributor of skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care products.  The Company’s sales are made primarily to department stores, perfumeries and specialty retailers.  The Company grants credit to all qualified customers and does not believe it is exposed significantly to any undue concentration of credit risk.

 

The Company’s largest customer sells products primarily within the United States and accounted for $313.3 million, or 13%, and $282.0 million, or 13%, of the Company’s consolidated net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  This customer accounted for $202.6 million, or 15%, and $92.3 million, or 10%, of the Company’s accounts receivable at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively.

 

Inventory and Promotional Merchandise

 

 

 

September 30

 

June 30

 

(In millions)

 

2011

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory and promotional merchandise, net consists of:

 

 

 

 

 

Raw materials

 

$

226.8

 

$

230.2

 

Work in process

 

74.2

 

93.6

 

Finished goods

 

494.4

 

475.4

 

Promotional merchandise

 

186.8

 

196.4

 

 

 

$

982.2

 

$

995.6

 

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

 

 

September 30

 

June 30

 

(In millions)

 

2011

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets (Useful Life)

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

$

14.7

 

$

15.0

 

Buildings and improvements (10 to 40 years)

 

189.9

 

195.5

 

Machinery and equipment (3 to 10 years)

 

623.8

 

635.3

 

Computer hardware and software (4 to 10 years)

 

715.9

 

707.1

 

Furniture and fixtures (5 to 10 years)

 

98.1

 

93.9

 

Leasehold improvements

 

1,197.7

 

1,215.3

 

 

 

2,840.1

 

2,862.1

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

1,715.0

 

1,719.0

 

 

 

$

1,125.1

 

$

1,143.1

 

 

The cost of assets related to projects in progress of $208.8 million and $183.5 million as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively, is included in their respective asset categories above.  Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment was $67.3 million and $65.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Depreciation and amortization related to the Company’s manufacturing process is included in cost of sales and all other depreciation and amortization is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.

 

Income Taxes

 

The effective rate for income taxes was 32.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

As of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest and penalties, totaled $105.8 million and $104.8 million, respectively.  The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2011 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $62.2 million.  The total gross interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended September 30, 2011 in the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings was $3.1 million.  The total gross accrued interest and penalties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 was $39.0 million and $37.7 million, respectively.  On the basis of the information available as of September 30, 2011, it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits could decrease in a range of $15 million to $25 million within 12 months as a result of projected resolutions of global tax examinations and controversies and a potential lapse of the applicable statutes of limitations.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company was notified that an appeal for judicial review by the National Appellate Court of Spain of a disallowance of tax deductions claimed by its subsidiary in Spain for fiscal years 1999 through 2002 has been denied.  The Company has been assessed corporate income tax and interest of $4.1 million, net of tax, at current exchange rates.  On July 21, 2011, the Company filed an appeal with the Spain Supreme Court.  While no assurance can be given as to the outcome in respect of this assessment and pending appeal in the Spanish courts, based on the decision of the National Appellate Court, management believes it is not more-likely-than-not that the subsidiary will be successful in its appeal to the Spain Supreme Court.  Accordingly, the Company established a reserve which resulted in an increase to the provision for income taxes equal to the $4.1 million exposure, net of tax.  Separately, during the fiscal 2012 first quarter the Company’s subsidiary in Spain made a cash payment of $3.7 million, at current exchange rates, to the Spain tax authority as an advance deposit to limit the additional interest that would be due to the Spain tax authority should it receive an unfavorable decision from the Spain Supreme Court.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its authoritative guidance related to Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts.  For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more-likely-than-not that a goodwill impairment exists.  In determining whether it is more-likely-than-not that a goodwill impairment exists, consideration should be made as to whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist.  This guidance became effective for the Company’s fiscal 2012 first quarter.  The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2010, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to business combinations entered into by an entity that are material on an individual or aggregate basis.  These amendments clarify existing guidance that if an entity presents comparative financial statements that include a material business combination, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period.  The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings.  This guidance became effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after the first day of the Company’s fiscal 2012.  This disclosure-only guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that will require entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements of assets and liabilities.  The Company adopted the new guidance in its fiscal 2010 third quarter, except for certain detailed recurring Level 3 disclosures, which became effective for the Company’s fiscal 2012 first quarter.  The Company currently does not have any recurring Level 3 assets or liabilities.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In September 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to testing goodwill for impairment.  Under the revised guidance, entities testing goodwill for impairment have the option of performing a qualitative assessment before performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test.  If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more-likely-than-not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required.  This guidance becomes effective in the beginning of the Company’s fiscal 2013, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the timing of adopting this guidance which will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In September 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to multiemployer benefit plans.  This revised disclosure-only guidance is intended to provide enhanced qualitative and quantitative disclosures about an employer’s significant financial obligations to a multiemployer pension plan and, therefore, help financial statement users better understand the financial health of all significant plans in which the employer participates.  To the extent the information required under the revised standard is not available in the public domain, as may be the case for some foreign plans, employers should include more qualitative information about the plan.  This disclosure-only guidance becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, with early adoption permitted and full retrospective application required.  The Company is currently evaluating the timing of adopting and the impact of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to the presentation of comprehensive income, requiring entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous statement or in two separate consecutive statements.  This guidance becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal 2013 first quarter.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance but believes that it will result only in changes in the presentation of its consolidated financial statements and will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

In May 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to fair value measurements to provide a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.  This guidance clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement and expands the existing disclosure requirements.  This guidance becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal 2012 third quarter.  This guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows, but may require certain additional disclosures.