10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For transition period from              to             

Commission file number 000-27464

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	95-4547287
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4800 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California	90010
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(323) 634-1700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 1,744,565 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding as of December 13, 2011.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010	1
		Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010	2
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010	3
		Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	4
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	29
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	30
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	30
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	30
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	30
	Item 4.	Reserved	30
	Item 5.	Other Information	30
	Item 6.	Exhibits	30
	Signatures		32
	Ex 31.1	Section 302 Certification of CEO
	Ex 31.2	Section 302 Certification of CFO
	Ex 32	Section 906 Certifications of CEO and CFO

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	September 30, 2011 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2010
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets
Cash	$	13,735		$	8,203
Federal funds sold		7,240			13,775
Cash and cash equivalents		20,975			21,978
Securities available for sale, at fair value		8,612			10,524
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $11,509 at September 30, 2011 and $13,261 at December 31, 2010)		11,000			12,737
Loans receivable held-for-sale, net		15,212			29,411
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $19,805 and $20,458		339,479			382,616
Accrued interest receivable		1,759			2,216
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost		4,089			4,089
Office properties and equipment, net		4,821			5,094
Real estate owned (REO), net		5,385			3,036
Bank owned life insurance		2,588			2,522
Deferred tax assets		2,873			5,369
Other assets		5,444			4,338
Total assets	$	422,237		$	483,930
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Deposits	$	294,850		$	348,445
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		87,000			87,000
Junior subordinated debentures		6,000			6,000
Other borrowings		5,000			5,000
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		584			272
Other liabilities		5,768			4,353
Total liabilities		399,202			451,070
Stockholders’ Equity:
Senior preferred, cumulative and non-voting stock, $.01 par value, authorized, issued and outstanding 9,000 shares of Series D at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; liquidation preference of $9,619 at September 30, 2011 and $9,281 at December 31, 2010		8,963			8,963
Senior preferred, cumulative and non-voting stock, $.01 par value, authorized, issued and outstanding 6,000 shares of Series E at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; liquidation preference of $6,412 at September 30, 2011 and $6,188 at December 31, 2010		5,974			5,974
Preferred, non-cumulative and non-voting stock, $.01 par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 55,199 shares of Series A, 100,000 shares of Series B and 76,950 shares of Series C at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; liquidation preference of $552 for Series A, $1,000 for Series B and $1,000 for Series C at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		2			2
Preferred stock discount		(1,092	)		(1,380	)
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 8,000,000 shares at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; issued 2,013,942 shares at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; outstanding 1,744,565 shares at September 30, 2011 and 1,743,965 shares at December 31, 2010		20			20
Additional paid-in capital		14,460			14,395
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		(2,141	)		8,074
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes of $206 at September 30, 2011 and $176 at December 31, 2010		293			263
Treasury stock-at cost, 269,377 shares at September 30, 2011 and 269,977 shares at December 31, 2010		(3,444	)		(3,451	)
Total stockholders’ equity		23,035			32,860
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	422,237		$	483,930

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

1

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Earnings (Loss)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Interest and fees on loans receivable	$	6,062		$	7,231		$	18,730		$	22,186
Interest on mortgage backed and other securities		176			228			539			767
Other interest income		9			16			28			41
Total interest income		6,247			7,475			19,297			22,994
Interest on deposits		1,056			1,492			3,492			4,563
Interest on borrowings		859			865			2,699			2,511
Total interest expense		1,915			2,357			6,191			7,074
Net interest income before provision for loan losses		4,332			5,118			13,106			15,920
Provision for loan losses		3,814			1,740			8,488			2,623
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		518			3,378			4,618			13,297
Non-interest income:
Service charges		176			275			533			677
Net gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities		(80	)		13			(73	)		(72	)
Net losses on sale of REO		(7	)		(53	)		(56	)		(88	)
Other		25			788			90			962
Total non-interest income		114			1,023			494			1,479
Non-interest expense:
Compensation and benefits		1,618			1,696			4,982			5,423
Occupancy expense, net		330			359			1,018			1,069
Information services		200			198			647			602
Professional services		284			214			744			810
Provision for losses on loans held-for-sale		702			556			728			1,103
Provision for losses on REO		1,251			669			2,033			780
FDIC insurance		144			233			781			695
Office services and supplies		135			147			417			424
Other		447			516			1,380			1,059
Total non-interest expense		5,111			4,588			12,730			11,965
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		(4,479	)		(187	)		(7,618	)		2,811
Income tax expense (benefit)		3,055			(31	)		1,767			1,133
Net earnings (loss)	$	(7,534	)	$	(156	)	$	(9,385	)	$	1,678
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale	$	(11	)	$	(122	)	$	60		$	135
Income tax effect		(2	)		49			(30	)		(54	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(13	)		(73	)		30			81
Comprehensive earnings (loss)	$	(7,547	)	$	(229	)	$	(9,355	)	$	1,759
Net earnings (loss)	$	(7,534	)	$	(156	)	$	(9,385	)	$	1,678
Dividends and discount accretion on preferred stock		(264	)		(282	)		(830	)		(863	)
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(7,798	)	$	(438	)	$	(10,215	)	$	815
Earnings (loss) per common share-basic	$	(4.47	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(5.86	)	$	0.47
Earnings (loss) per common share-diluted	$	(4.47	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(5.86	)	$	0.47
Dividends declared per share-common stock	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.01

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

2

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)	$	(9,385	)	$	1,678
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		8,488			2,623
Provision for losses on loans receivable held-for-sale		728			1,103
Provision for losses on REO		2,033			780
Depreciation		306			320
Net amortization of deferred loan origination (fees) costs		3			6
Net amortization of premiums on mortgage-backed securities		78			148
Stock-based compensation expense		66			103
Earnings on bank owned life insurance		(66	)		(82	)
Net losses on sales of REO		56			88
Net losses on sales of loans		88			136
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable		457			(92	)
Deferred tax assets		2,466			(131	)
Other assets		(1,388	)		2,220
Other liabilities		1,377			(320	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		5,307			8,580
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net change in loans receivable		24,413			7,234
Proceeds from sales and principal repayments of loans receivable held-for-sale		15,661			3,841
Available-for-sale securities:
Maturities, prepayments and calls		1,898			3,586
Held-to-maturity securities:
Maturities, prepayments and calls		1,733			2,766
Proceeds from sales of REO		3,712			2,455
Investment in affordable housing limited partnership		(417	)		(359	)
Redemption of FHLB stock		—			106
Additions to office properties and equipment		(33	)		(115	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		46,967			19,514
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in deposits		(53,595	)		(14,635	)
Proceeds from FHLB advances		7,000			—
Repayments on FHLB advances		(7,000	)		(3,600	)
Net increase in other borrowings		—			5,000
Cash dividends paid		—			(527	)
Reissuance of treasury stock		6			6
Net change in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		312			379
Net cash used in financing activities		(53,277	)		(13,377	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(1,003	)		14,717
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		21,978			7,440
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	20,975		$	22,157
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	5,661		$	7,145
Cash paid for income taxes	$	980		$	—
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Transfers of loans receivable to REO	$	7,691		$	4,404
Transfers of loans receivable held-for-sale to REO	$	266		$	344
Transfers of loans receivable from loans receivable, net to loans receivable held-for-sale	$	2,544		$	1,422

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2011

NOTE (1) – Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include Broadway Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Broadway Federal Bank, f.s.b. (the “Bank”). Also included in the unaudited consolidated financial statements is Broadway Service Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. These unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all disclosures associated with the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and, accordingly, should be read in conjunction with such audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (all of which are normal and recurring in nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

Some items in the consolidated financial statements for the prior period were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

NOTE (2) – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, updated to amend previous guidance with respect to troubled debt restructurings. This updated guidance is designed to assist creditors with determining whether or not a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. In particular, additional guidance has been added to help creditors determine whether a concession has been granted and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. Both of these conditions are required to be met for a restructuring to constitute a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in the update are effective for the first interim period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. Adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 addresses convergence between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) requirements for measurement of and disclosures about fair value. The amendments are not expected to have a significant impact on companies applying U.S. GAAP. Key provisions of the amendment include: a prohibition on grouping financial instruments for purposes of determining fair value, except when an entity manages market and credit risks on the basis of the entity’s net exposure to the group; an extension of the prohibition against the use of a blockage factor to all fair value measurements (that prohibition currently applies only to financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets); and a requirement that for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements, entities disclose quantitative information about unobservable inputs, a description of the valuation process used and qualitative details about the sensitivity of the measurements. In addition, for items not carried at fair value but for which fair value is disclosed, entities will be required to disclose the level within the fair value hierarchy that applies to the fair value measurement disclosed. The amendments in ASU 2011-04 are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which will require companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. It eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 does

4

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

not change the items which must be reported in other comprehensive income, how such items are measured, or when they must be reclassified to net income. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Since the provisions of ASU 2011-05 are presentation related only, the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE (3) – Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, increased for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents.

The following table shows how the Company computed basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share)
Basic
Net earnings (loss)	$	(7,534	)	$	(156	)	$	(9,385	)	$	1,678
Less: Preferred stock dividends and accretion		(264	)		(282	)		(830	)		(863	)
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(7,798	)	$	(438	)	$	(10,215	)	$	815
Weighted average common shares outstanding		1,744,565			1,743,965			1,744,251			1,743,649
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(4.47	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(5.86	)	$	0.47
Diluted
Net earnings (loss)	$	(7,534	)	$	(156	)	$	(9,385	)	$	1,678
Less: Preferred stock dividends and accretion		(264	)		(282	)		(830	)		(863	)
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(7,798	)	$	(438	)	$	(10,215	)	$	815
Weighted average common shares outstanding		1,744,565			1,743,965			1,744,251			1,743,649
Add: dilutive effects of assumed exercises of stock options		N/A			N/A			N/A			1,319
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares		1,744,565			1,743,965			1,744,251			1,744,967
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(4.47	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(5.86	)	$	0.47

Stock options for 227,075 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and stock options for 237,547 and 223,547 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 because they were anti-dilutive.

5

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

NOTE (4) – Securities

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities portfolios at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains which are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), for available-for-sale investment securities, were as follows:

	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
Residential mortgage-backed	$	8,113	$	499	$	—	$	8,612
Total available-for-sale	$	8,113	$	499	$	—	$	8,612
Held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed	$	10,000	$	429	$	—	$	10,429
U.S. Government and federal agency		1,000		80		—		1,080
Total held-to-maturity	$	11,000	$	509	$	—	$	11,509

	December 31, 2010
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
Residential mortgage-backed	$	10,085	$	439	$	—	$	10,524
Total available-for-sale	$	10,085	$	439	$	—	$	10,524
Held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed	$	11,737	$	425	$	—	$	12,162
U.S. Government and federal agency		1,000		99		—		1,099
Total held-to-maturity	$	12,737	$	524	$	—	$	13,261

The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolios are shown by contractual maturity at September 30, 2011. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily residential mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately.

	Available-for-Sale				Held-to-Maturity
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Maturity	(In thousands)
Within one year	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
One to five years		—		—		1,000		1,080
Five to ten years		—		—		—		—
Beyond ten years		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage-backed		8,113		8,612		10,000		10,429
Total	$	8,113	$	8,612	$	11,000	$	11,509

6

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

Securities pledged at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 had a carrying amount of $11.0 million and $12.7 million and were pledged to secure public deposits and FHLB advances. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity. There were no sales of securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

There were no securities with unrealized losses at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. We evaluate securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the cost, and our intent and ability to retain our investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, we consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition.

NOTE (5) – Loans Receivable Held-for-Sale, Net

Loans receivable held-for-sale at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Multi-family residential	$	6,463		$	16,217
Commercial real estate		2,064			5,067
Church		7,993			9,408
Valuation allowance for unrealized losses		(1,308	)		(1,281	)
Loans receivable, held for sale, net	$	15,212		$	29,411

Loans receivable held-for-sale, net, consisted of multi-family, commercial real estate and church loans originated for sale and multi-family loans transferred from our loan portfolio. Non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale included in loans receivable held-for-sale, net, totaled $5.5 million, net of charge-offs of $823 thousand and a $910 thousand valuation allowance, as of September 30, 2011 and totaled $5.1 million, net of charge-offs of $414 thousand and a $769 thousand valuation allowance, at December 31, 2010. Restructured loans receivable held-for-sale that have complied with the terms of their restructured agreements for a satisfactory period of time and certain performing loans receivable held-for-sale with delinquency or other weaknesses totaled $3.8 million, net of a $398 thousand valuation allowance, as of September 30, 2011 and totaled $8.0 million, net of a $512 thousand valuation allowance, as of December 31, 2010. A loan receivable held-for-sale secured by a church building, which had a carrying amount of $266 thousand, net of charge-off of $292 thousand, was transferred to REO during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Net lower of cost or market write-downs on non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale totaled $667 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $817 thousand for the same period in 2010. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we increased our valuation allowance by $61 thousand and $286 thousand, respectively, on some of our loans held for sale that are still considered performing loans.

7

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

NOTE (6) – Loans Receivable

Loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Real estate:
One to four units	$	77,876		$	82,764
Five or more units		111,294			128,534
Commercial real estate		64,094			72,770
Church		92,149			97,634
Construction		4,230			5,421
Commercial:
Sports		2,000			5,768
Other		5,876			6,410
Consumer:
Loan on savings		1,006			3,259
Other		13			29
Total gross loans receivable		358,538			402,589
Less:
Loans in process		119			371
Net deferred loan fees (costs)		(883	)		(889	)
Unamortized discounts		18			33
Allowance for loan losses		19,805			20,458
Loans receivable, net	$	339,479		$	382,616

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:

	For the three months ended September 30, 2011
	One to four units			Five or more units			Commercial real estate			Church			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	4,229		$	2,892		$	6,253		$	7,197		$	68		$	1,538		$	68		$	22,245
Provision for loan losses		181			249			204			564			(1	)		2,627			(10	)		3,814
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—			15			15
Loans charged off		(519	)		(289	)		(207	)		(1,623	)		—			(3,631	)		—			(6,269	)
Ending balance	$	3,891		$	2,852		$	6,250		$	6,138		$	67		$	534		$	73		$	19,805

	For the nine months ended September 30, 2011
	One to four units			Five or more units			Commercial real estate			Church			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	4,579		$	2,469		$	3,493		$	6,909		$	74		$	1,300		$	1,634		$	20,458
Provision for loan losses		(64	)		821			3,573			1,041			(7	)		2,865			259			8,488
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—			23			23
Loans charged off		(624	)		(438	)		(816	)		(1,812	)		—			(3,631	)		(1,843	)		(9,164	)
Ending balance	$	3,891		$	2,852		$	6,250		$	6,138		$	67		$	534		$	73		$	19,805

8

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was as follows:

	For the three months ended September 30, 2010			For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	18,462		$	20,460
Provision for loan losses		1,740			2,623
Recoveries		3			3
Loans charged off		(1,723	)		(4,604	)
Ending balance	$	18,482		$	18,482

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011
	One to four units		Five or more units		Commercial real estate		Church		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	858	$	139	$	3,259	$	1,927	$	—	$	285	$	—	$	6,468
Collectively evaluated for impairment		3,033		2,713		2,991		4,211		67		249		73		13,337
Total ending allowance balance	$	3,891	$	2,852	$	6,250	$	6,138	$	67	$	534	$	73	$	19,805
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	13,393	$	4,277	$	12,340	$	30,169	$	313	$	285	$	—	$	60,777
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		64,483		107,017		51,754		61,980		3,917		7,591		1,019		297,761
Total ending loans balance	$	77,876	$	111,294	$	64,094	$	92,149	$	4,230	$	7,876	$	1,019	$	358,538

	December 31, 2010
	One to four units		Five or more units		Commercial real estate		Church		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	423	$	69	$	935	$	2,118	$	—	$	942	$	1,541	$	6,028
Collectively evaluated for impairment		4,156		2,400		2,558		4,791		74		358		93		14,430
Total ending allowance balance	$	4,579	$	2,469	$	3,493	$	6,909	$	74	$	1,300	$	1,634	$	20,458
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	9,962	$	2,260	$	13,206	$	26,251	$	320	$	3,768	$	2,265	$	58,032
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		72,802		126,274		59,564		71,383		5,101		8,410		1,023		344,557
Total ending loans balance	$	82,764	$	128,534	$	72,770	$	97,634	$	5,421	$	12,178	$	3,288	$	402,589

9

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

The following table presents information related to impaired loans by class of loans as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:

	September 30, 2011
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Cash Basis Interest Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
One to four units	$	5,686	$	4,082	$	—	$	4,922	$	—	$	—
Five or more units		3,393		3,306		—		2,239		—		—
Commercial real estate		7,586		7,221		—		10,444		134		132
Church		17,286		15,324		—		15,660		93		92
Construction		313		313		—		317		—		—
Commercial:
Sports		4,000		—		—		3,336		—		—
Consumer:
Loan on savings		—		—		—		1,035		—		—
With an allowance recorded:
One to four units		9,649		9,311		858		5,236		227		227
Five or more units		971		971		139		742		18		18
Commercial real estate		5,119		5,119		3,259		2,173		—		—
Church		15,099		14,845		1,927		14,130		486		464
Commercial:
Other		285		285		285		259		—		—
Total	$	69,387	$	60,777	$	6,468	$	60,493	$	958	$	933

The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable and loan origination fees, net due to immateriality. For purposes of this disclosure, the unpaid principal balance is not reduced for net charge-offs. Interest income recognized during impairment represents interest income earned on performing TDRs. Cash-basis interest income recognized represents cash received for interest payments on performing TDRs.

10

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

The following table presents information related to impaired loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2010:

	December 31, 2010
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
One to four units	$	7,953	$	5,991	$	—
Five or more units		600		586		—
Commercial real estate		8,409		8,133		—
Church		11,782		11,161		—
Construction		320		320		—
With an allowance recorded:
One to four units		4,129		3,971		423
Five or more units		1,674		1,674		69
Commercial real estate		5,072		5,073		935
Church		15,183		15,090		2,118
Commercial:
Sports		4,000		3,768		942
Other		—		—		—
Consumer:
Loan on savings		2,249		2,249		1,525
Other		16		16		16
Total	$	61,387	$	58,032	$	6,028

	For the nine months  ended September 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Average recorded investment in impaired loans	$	49,146
Interest income recognized during impairment		1,062
Cash basis interest income recognized		826

The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Loans receivable, held for sale:
Five or more units	$	1,559	$	385
Commercial real estate		413		—
Church		4,436		5,533
Loans receivable, net:
One to four-units		8,095		6,227
Five or more units		3,888		1,865
Commercial real estate		9,487		10,321
Church		19,481		12,748
Construction		313		320
Commercial:
Sports		—		3,768
Other		285		—
Consumer:
Loan on Savings		—		2,249
Other		—		16
Total nonaccrual loans	$	47,957	$	43,432

11

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

There were no loans 90 days or more delinquent that were accruing interest as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans, including loans held for sale, as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011 by class of loans:

	September 30, 2011
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Loans Not Past Due
	(In thousands)
Loans receivable, held for sale:
Five or more units	$	991	$	—	$	1,559	$	2,550	$	3,913
Commercial real estate		274		—		413		687		1,377
Church		778		—		4,436		5,214		2,779
Loans receivable, net:
One to four units		1,643		1,926		8,095		11,664		66,212
Five or more units		172		—		3,888		4,060		107,234
Commercial real estate		2,776		—		9,487		12,263		51,831
Church		3,339		2,757		19,481		25,577		66,572
Construction		120		—		313		433		3,797
Commercial:
Sports		—		—		—		—		2,000
Other		131		27		285		443		5,433
Consumer:
Loan on savings		—		—		—		—		1,006
Other		—		—		—		—		13
Total	$	10,224	$	4,710	$	47,957	$	62,891	$	312,167
	December 31, 2010
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Loans Not Past Due
	(In thousands)
Loans receivable, held for sale:
Five or more units	$	1,209	$	—	$	385	$	1,594	$	14,623
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		5,067
Church		—		—		5,533		5,533		3,875
Loans receivable, net:
One to four units	$	2,716	$	71	$	6,227	$	9,014	$	73,750
Five or more units		805		1,068		1,865		3,738		124,796
Commercial real estate		769		1,287		10,321		12,377		60,393
Church		12,914		5,230		12,748		30,892		66,742
Construction		898		—		320		1,218		4,203
Commercial:
Sports		—		—		3,768		3,768		2,000
Other		325		—		—		325		6,085
Consumer:
Loan on savings		—		—		2,249		2,249		1,010
Other		—		—		16		16		13
Total	$	19,636	$	7,656	$	43,432	$	70,724	$	362,557

Troubled Debt Restructurings

        On July 1, 2011, the Company adopted the guidance in ASU, 2011-02, “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring” which clarifies the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession in a debt restructuring and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties in evaluating whether the debt restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The guidance in ASU 2011-02 was effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying this guidance, the Company did not identify receivables that were newly considered impaired.

The Company has allocated $1.4 million and $1.6 million of specific reserves for loans the terms of which have been modified in troubled debt restructurings and were performing as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. At September 30, 2011, loans classified as a TDR totaled $36.4 million, of which $15.6 million were included in nonaccrual loans and $20.8 million were on accrual status. At December 31, 2010, loans classified as a TDR totaled $37.1 million, of which $14.6 million were included in nonaccrual loans and $22.5 million were on accrual status. TDRs on accrual status are comprised of loans that were accruing at the time of restructuring or loans that have complied with the terms of their restructured agreements for a satisfactory period of time, and for which the Bank anticipates full repayment of both principal and interest. TDRs that are on non-accrual can be returned to accrual status after a period of sustained performance, generally determined to be six months of timely payments as modified. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has no commitment to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings.

During the nine months ending September 30, 2011, the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings. The modification of the terms of such loans involved a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan for periods ranging from 18 months to 5 years.

12

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the nine months ending September 30, 2011:

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
One to four units		6	$	4,354	$	4,360
Five or more units		1		494		459
Commercial real estate		1		418		418
Church		7		7,441		6,915
Total		15	$	12,707	$	12,152

The troubled debt restructurings described above increased the allowance for loan losses by $652 thousand and resulted in charge offs of $1.0 million during the nine months ending September 30, 2011.

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification during the nine months ending September 30, 2011:

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate		1	$	418
Total		1	$	418

A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms.

The troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted described above resulted in a charge off of $207 thousand during the nine months ending September 30, 2011.

The terms of certain other loans were modified during the nine months ending September 30, 2011 that did not meet the definition of a troubled debt restructuring. These loans have a total recorded investment as of September 30, 2011 of $3.2 million. The modification of these loans involved either a modification of the terms of a loan to borrowers who were not experiencing financial difficulties or an extension of the maturity date for periods ranging from 3 months to 10 years at a stated rate of interest equal to the current market rate for new debt with similar risk.

In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the company’s internal underwriting policy.

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed at least on a quarterly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

13

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

• Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

• Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

• Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

• Loss. Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that to continue to carry the loan as an active asset is no longer warranted.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:

	As of September 30, 2011
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss
	(In thousands)
One to four units	$	64,553	$	3,058	$	10,265	$	—	$	—
Five or more units		99,247		6,515		5,532		—		—
Commercial real estate		42,146		6,379		15,491		79		—
Church		38,443		11,611		42,054		41		—
Construction		1,046		2,871		313		—		—
Commercial:
Sports		—		2,000		—		—		—
Other		2,600		2,892		384		—		—
Consumer:
Loan on savings		1,006		—		—		—		—
Other		13		—		—		—		—
Total	$	249,053	$	35,326	$	74,039	$	120	$	—

	As of December 31, 2010
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss
	(In thousands)
One to four units	$	71,846	$	2,440	$	8,478	$	—	$	—
Five or more units		118,490		6,412		3,632		—		—
Commercial real estate		46,692		5,281		20,797		—		—
Church		42,931		14,229		40,204		270		—
Construction		4,203		320		898		—		—
Commercial:
Sports		—		2,000		3,768		—		—
Other		925		4,870		615		—		—
Consumer:
Loan on savings		1,010		—		2,249		—		—
Other		13		—		—		—		16
Total	$	286,110	$	35,552	$	80,641	$	270	$	16

14

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

NOTE (7) – Junior Subordinated Debentures, Other Borrowings and Management’s Capital Plan

On March 17, 2004, the Company issued $6.0 million of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures in a private placement. The debentures mature in 10 years and interest is payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the 3-month LIBOR plus 2.54%. The interest rate is determined as of each March 17, June 17, September 17, and December 17, and was 2.89% at September 30, 2011. The Company stopped paying interest on the debentures and the senior line of credit discussed below in September 2010. As disclosed previously, the Company is not permitted to make payments on any debts without prior notice to and receipt of written notice of non-objection from the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) Regional Director. In addition, under the terms of the subordinated debentures, the Company is not allowed to make payments on the subordinated debentures if the Company is in default on any of its senior indebtedness, which term includes the senior line of credit described below.

On February 28, 2010, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $5.0 million under its $5.0 million line of credit with another financial institution, and invested all of the proceeds in the equity capital of the Bank. The interest rate on the line of credit adjusts annually, subject to a minimum of 6.00% and increases by an additional 5% in the event of default. Borrowings under this line of credit are secured by the Company’s assets. The full amount of this borrowing became due and payable on July 31, 2010. This senior line of credit has not been repaid and the Company is now in default under the line of credit agreement. On April 7, 2011, the lender agreed to forbear from exercising its rights (other than increasing the interest rate by the default rate margin) pursuant to the line of credit agreement until January 1, 2012 subject to the following conditions:

• The Company shall make a forbearance payment in the amount of $25,000 to the lender no later than July 31, 2011 provided that the Company is able to obtain the necessary approval to make such payment from the OTS or its successors, and in the event the Company is unable to obtain such approval by said date, the Company shall make such payment as soon as permitted thereafter. The Company has not received the required regulatory approval for such payment to date.

• The Company shall use its best efforts to continue to attempt to raise a minimum of $5.0 million in private placements under the Company’s Recapitalization Plan as discussed below.

• The Bank shall not experience anything that would constitute an Event of Default, or be placed into receivership by the FDIC.

The Company is pursuing a comprehensive recapitalization plan to improve the Company’s capital structure. To date, the Company has obtained the written consent of the U.S. Treasury to exchange the Company’s Series D and Series E Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock for common stock at a discount of 50% of the liquidation amount, plus an undiscounted exchange of the accumulated but unpaid dividends on such preferred stock for common stock. In addition, the Company is in negotiations with the holders of Series A and Series B Perpetual Preferred Stock and Series C Noncumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock to exchange their holdings for common stock at a discount of 50% of the liquidation amount. The Company is also in negotiations with the lender to exchange a portion of the Company’s senior line of credit, which is currently in default, for common stock at 100% of the face amount to be exchanged and to forgive the accrued interest on the entire amount of the line of credit to the date of the exchange.

The Company plans to concurrently complete private placements or other sales of the Company’s common stock aggregating $5 million or more in gross proceeds. The Company anticipates that these transactions would, if completed, result in the issuance of approximately 7.5 million new shares of the Company’s common stock, which would constitute approximately 80% of the pro forma outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. The 7.5 million new shares of common stock exceed the Company’s current unissued and authorized shares. The Company plans to obtain existing shareholders approval to increase the Company’s authorized shares.

There can be no assurance that management’s capital plan will be achieved. If the Company is unable to raise capital, management plans to continue to shrink assets, sell the headquarters building, decrease NPAs and implement strategies to increase earnings. Failure to maintain capital sufficient to meet the higher capital requirements could result in further regulatory action.

15

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

NOTE (8) – Fair Value

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:

The fair values of securities available-for-sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).

The fair value of non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale is generally based upon the fair value of the collateral which is obtained from recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Impaired loans, other than performing TDRs, are generally collateral dependent and, as such, are carried at the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. Fair values are estimated through current appraisals, broker opinions or automated valuation models and adjusted as necessary, by management, to reflect current market conditions and, as such, are classified as Level 3.

Nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as real estate owned (“REO”) are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.

16

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

			Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2011 Using
	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available-for-sale - residential mortgage-backed	$	8,612	$	—	$	8,612	$	—

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using
	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available-for-sale - residential mortgage-backed	$	10,524	$	—	$	10,524	$	—

Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis

The following table provides information regarding the carrying values of our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at the dates indicated. The fair value measurement for all of these assets falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

	Carrying Value at
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale, net:
Five or more units	$	1,533	$	366
Commercial real estate		215		—
Church		3,750		4,783
Impaired loans carried at fair value of collateral:
One to four units		6,254		3,775
Five or more units		901		1,606
Commercial real estate		2,151		2,542
Church		11,058		5,591
Commercial		—		2,826
Consumer		—		749
Real estate owned:
One to four units		549		1,086
Five or more units		—		260
Commercial real estate		3,829		568
Church		1,007		1,122

17

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

The following table provides information regarding our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2011, and the losses recognized on these assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

	Principal Amount at September 30, 2011		Valuation Allowance at September 30, 2011		Losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011
	(In thousands)
Non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale, net (1)	$	6,408	$	910	$	667
Impaired loans carried at fair value of collateral (2)		25,655		5,291		9,523
Real estate owned (3)		6,031		646		2,033
Total	$	38,094	$	6,847	$	12,223

(1) Losses are charged to provision for losses on loans receivable held-for-sale.

(2) Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Includes $8.9 million of loans that were carried at cost as the fair value of the collateral on these loans exceeded the book value as a result of charge-offs.

(3) Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses in the case of a write-down upon the transfer of a loan to REO. Losses subsequent to the transfer of a loan to REO are charged to provision for losses on REO.

The following table provides information regarding our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2010, and the losses recognized on these assets for the year ended December 31, 2010.

	Principal Amount at December 31, 2010		Valuation Allowance at December 31, 2010		Losses for the year ended December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale, net (1)	$	5,918	$	769	$	902
Impaired loans carried at fair value of collateral (2)		21,509		4,420		4,829
Real estate owned (3)		3,090		54		1,102
Total	$	30,517	$	5,243	$	6,833

(1) Losses are charged to provision for losses on loans receivable held-for-sale.

(2) Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Includes $5.4 million of loans that were carried at cost as the fair value of the collateral on these loans exceeded the book value as a result of charge-offs.

(3) Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses in the case of a write-down upon the transfer of a loan to REO. Losses subsequent to the transfer of a loan to REO are charged to provision for losses on REO.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,975	$	20,975	$	21,978	$	21,978
Securities available-for-sale		8,612		8,612		10,524		10,524
Securities held-to-maturity		11,000		11,509		12,737		13,261
Loans receivable held for sale, net		15,212		15,212		29,411		29,411
Loans receivable, net		339,479		339,975		382,616		384,274
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,089		N/A		4,089		N/A
Accrued interest receivable		1,759		1,759		2,216		2,216

18

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	$	(294,850	)	$	(295,338	)	$	(348,445	)	$	(347,373	)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(87,000	)		(92,976	)		(87,000	)		(91,615	)
Junior subordinated debentures		(6,000	)		(4,905	)		(6,000	)		(4,609	)
Other borrowings		(5,000	)		(5,000	)		(5,000	)		(4,979	)
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		(584	)		(584	)		(272	)		(272	)
Accrued interest payable		(1,080	)		(1,080	)		(550	)		(550	)

The methods and assumptions, not previously presented, used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short term debt, advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance, and variable rate loans, deposits and borrowings that reprice frequently and fully. The methods for determining the fair values for securities were described previously. For fixed rate loans and deposits and for variable rate loans and deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk without consideration of widening credit spreads due to market illiquidity. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair values of off-balance-sheet items are not considered material (or are based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements) and, as such, they are not presented herein.

NOTE (9) – Stock-based Compensation

In 2008, we adopted the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2008 LTIP”), which is shareholder approved. The 2008 LTIP replaced the Company’s 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“1996 LTIP”) and 1996 Stock Option Plan (“Stock Option Plan”), which have expired and are no longer effective except as to outstanding awards. The 2008 LTIP permits the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, full value awards and cash incentive awards to the Company’s non-employee directors and certain officers and employees for up to 351,718 shares of common stock. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant; those option awards have vesting periods ranging from immediate vesting to 5 years and have 10-year contractual terms. The Company has a policy of using shares held as treasury stock to satisfy share option exercises. Currently, the Company has a sufficient number of treasury shares to satisfy expected share option exercises.

There were no options granted during the first nine months of 2011. The Company recorded $39 thousand of stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $62 thousand for the first nine months of 2010.

NOTE (10) – Regulatory Matters

The Bank is subject to regulatory capital requirements now administered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or OCC, which is the statutory successor under the Dodd-Frank Act to the former Office of Thrift Supervision, or OTS. The capital requirements, which remain the same as when administered by the OTS, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the OCC. Failure to meet capital requirements can result in regulatory action.

Prompt corrective action regulations also administered by the OCC provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If only adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.

The Company and the Bank have consented to the issuance to them of cease and desist orders by the OTS effective

19

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

September 9, 2010 requiring, among other things, that the Company and the Bank take remedial actions to improve the Bank’s loan underwriting and internal asset review procedures, to reduce the amount of its non-performing assets and to improve other aspects of the Bank’s business, as well as the Company’s management of its business and the oversight of the Company’s business by the Board. The cease and desist orders require the Bank to attain, and thereafter maintain, a Tier 1 (Core) Capital to Adjusted Total Assets ratio of at least 8% and a Total Risk-Based Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets ratio of at least 12%, both of which ratios are greater than the respective 6% and 10% levels for such ratios that are generally required under OTS (now OCC) regulations. The cease and desist orders also prohibit the Bank from paying dividends to the Company, and prohibit the Company from paying dividends to its stockholders, without the prior written approval of the OCC. In addition, the Company is not permitted to incur, issue, renew, repurchase, make payments on or increase any debt or redeem any capital stock without prior notice to and receipt of written notice of non-objection from the OCC.

We have met the minimum capital requirements at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 to conform to the general regulatory definition of “well-capitalized” under the prompt corrective action regulations, however we cannot be considered well capitalized while under the cease and desist order.

Actual and normally required capital amounts and ratios at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, together with the higher capital requirements that the Bank is required to meet under the cease and desist order applicable to it, are presented below.

	Actual					Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations					Capital Requirements under Cease and Desist Order
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratios			Amount		Ratios
	(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2011:
Tangible Capital to adjusted total assets	$	34,439		8.16	%	$	6,328		1.50	%		N/A		N/A			N/A		N/A
Tier 1(Core) Capital to adjusted total assets	$	34,439		8.16	%	$	16,876		4.00	%	$	21,095		5.00	%	$	33,752		8.00	%
Tier 1(Core) Capital to risk weighted assets	$	34,439		10.92	%		N/A		N/A		$	18,921		6.00	%		N/A		N/A
Total Capital to risk weighted assets	$	38,505		12.21	%	$	25,228		8.00	%	$	31,534		10.00	%	$	37,841		12.00	%
December 31, 2010:
Tangible Capital to adjusted total assets	$	42,630		8.82	%	$	7,252		1.50	%		N/A		N/A			N/A		N/A
Tier 1(Core) Capital to adjusted total assets	$	42,630		8.82	%	$	19,338		4.00	%	$	24,172		5.00	%	$	38,676		8.00	%
Tier 1(Core) Capital to risk weighted assets	$	42,630		11.76	%		N/A		N/A		$	21,754		6.00	%		N/A		N/A
Total Capital to risk weighted assets	$	47,299		13.05	%	$	29,006		8.00	%	$	36,257		10.00	%	$	43,508		12.00	%

NOTE (11) – Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management evaluates both positive and negative evidence, including the existence of any cumulative losses in the current year and the prior two years, the amount of taxes paid in available carry-back years, the forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies, which include selling certain assets that we own for a $2.0 million gain, and assessments of current and future economic and business conditions. This analysis is updated quarterly and adjusted as necessary. Based on the analysis, the Company has determined that a valuation allowance of $6.9 million for deferred tax assets was required as of September 30, 2011. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $507 thousand at year-end 2010. The increase in the valuation allowance against its federal and state deferred tax assets was due to the large net losses in the last two quarters and the Company’s inability to project sufficient future taxable income.

20

BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

September 30, 2011

NOTE (12) – Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going-concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. However, the Company has a tax sharing liability to the Bank which exceeds operating cash at the Company level. We are working with our primary regulator to determine when this liability must be settled. Additionally, the Company is in default under the terms of a $5 million line of credit with another financial institution lender (see Note 7), although that lender has agreed to forbear from exercising its rights to foreclose on the Bank until January 1, 2012, subject to certain conditions.

If additional such forbearances on the line of credit cannot be obtained, or if the tax sharing payment from the Company to the Bank is determined to be due prior to the time that the Company is able to raise additional capital, the Company’s cash position will be affected negatively and it will run out of operating cash. Due to the current regulatory order that is in effect, the Bank is not allowed to make distributions to the Company without regulatory approval, and such approval is not likely to be given. Therefore, the Company would not be able to meet its payment obligations within the foreseeable future unless the Company is able to secure new capital and/or obtain requisite forbearances from its lender. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management’s plan to address the conditions described above is to raise additional equity capital for the Company. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the timely implementation and success of this plan. Although management presently believes that this plan can be effectively implemented during 2012, there can be no assurance that management’s plan will be achieved.

21

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Part I “Item 1, Financial Statements,” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Overview

Total assets decreased during the first nine months of 2011 primarily due to a decrease in our loan portfolio, as loan repayments, foreclosures and charge-offs exceeded loan originations during the period. The decrease in our loan portfolio consisted of a $17.2 million decrease in our multi-family residential real estate loan portfolio, a $8.7 million decrease in our commercial real estate loan portfolio, a $5.5 million decrease in our church loan portfolio, a $4.9 million decrease in our one-to-four family residential real estate loan portfolio, a $4.3 million decrease in our commercial loan portfolio, a $2.3 million decrease in our consumer loan portfolio, and a $1.2 million decrease in our construction loan portfolio. The securities portfolio decreased $3.6 million from December 31, 2010 as a result of cash flows from repayments. The decline in assets reflects our strategy, which we have been implementing since the second quarter of 2010 to maintain our capital ratios above the required regulatory thresholds and strengthen our liquidity and deposit base, in part by reducing both potential problem loans and non-performing assets.

Total deposits decreased during the first nine months of 2011, as we continued to allow maturing certificates of deposit and brokered deposits, including deposits obtained through the CDARS reciprocal deposit referral system, to run off as total assets declined. Since the end of 2010, FHLB borrowings remained unchanged at $87.0 million, subordinated debentures remained unchanged at $6.0 million and other borrowings remained unchanged at $5.0 million.

Our net losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were ($7.5) million and ($9.4) million, respectively, compared to net earnings (loss) of ($156) thousand and $1.7 million, respectively, for the same periods a year ago, representing an increase in net loss of $7.4 million and $11.1 million, respectively. The increase in net loss was primarily due to higher provision for loan losses, higher income tax provision expense, which resulted from tax provision true-ups and an increase in the valuation allowance against our federal and state deferred tax assets, higher provision for losses on real estate owned (“REO”), which resulted from lower of cost or market write downs, and to a lesser extent, lower net interest income and lower non-interest income.

Results of Operations

Net Earnings

Net loss for the third quarter of 2011 was ($7.5) million, or ($4.47) per diluted common share, compared to net loss of ($156) thousand, or ($0.25) per diluted common share, for the third quarter of 2010. The increase in net loss primarily reflected higher provision for loan losses, higher income tax provision expense, higher provision for losses on REO, and to a lesser extent, lower net interest income and non-interest income.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company reported a net loss of ($9.4) million, or ($5.86) per diluted common share compared to net earnings of $1.7 million, or $0.47 per diluted common share for the same period in 2010.

Net Interest Income

For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, our net interest income before provision for loan losses was $4.3 million, which represented a decrease of $786 thousand, or 15%, from the third quarter of 2010. The decrease in net interest income was primarily attributable to a $4.1 million decrease in average net interest-earning assets, as our average interest-earning assets decreased $91.0 million and our average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $86.9 million. The decline in interest-earning assets reflected the strategy that we have been implementing since the second quarter of 2010 to reduce and resolve non-performing assets and to constrain asset growth, in our efforts to increase our capital ratios above the required thresholds, and strengthen our liquidity.

22

Average interest-earning assets for the third quarter of 2011 decreased to $430.9 million, down $91.0 million from the third quarter of 2010. The decrease in average interest-earning assets resulted in a $1.1 million reduction in interest income. The annualized yield on our average interest-earning assets increased 10 basis points to 5.80% for the third quarter of 2011, from 5.70% for the same period a year ago. The 10 basis point increase in the annualized yield on our average interest-earning assets resulted in an increase of $82 thousand in interest income.

Average interest-bearing liabilities for the third quarter of 2011 decreased to $402.7 million, down $86.9 million from the third quarter of 2010. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities resulted in a $442 thousand reduction in interest expense. The annualized cost of our average interest-bearing liabilities decreased 3 basis points to 1.90% for the third quarter of 2011 from the annualized cost of 1.93% for the same period a year ago, and resulted in a decrease of $9 thousand in interest expense.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net interest income before provision for loan losses totaled $13.1 million, down $2.8 million, or 18%, from $15.9 million of net interest income before provision for loan losses for the same period a year ago. The $2.8 million decrease in net interest income primarily resulted from a $69.9 million decrease in average interest-earning assets and a 20 basis point decrease in net interest margin.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

We record a provision for loan losses as a charge to earnings when necessary in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient, in management’s judgment, to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. At least quarterly, we conduct an assessment of the overall quality of the loan portfolio and general economic trends in the local market. The determination of the appropriate level for the allowance is based on that review, considering such factors as historical loss experience for each type of loan, the size and composition of our loan portfolio, the levels and composition of our loan delinquencies, non-performing loans and net loan charge-offs, the value of underlying collateral on problem loans, regulatory policies, general economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectability of loans in the portfolio.

The provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2011 totaled $3.8 million compared to $1.7 million for the same period a year ago. The $3.8 million provision for loan losses in the third quarter of 2011 primarily reflected the full charge-off of a single commercial loan relationship totaling $3.6 million, of which $924 thousand was reserved for at year-end 2010. The third quarter provision was also impacted by specific loss allocations on loans that became impaired during the quarter and other collateral dependent loans for which recent valuation of the underlying collateral reflected decrease in values.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the provision for loan losses totaled $8.5 million compared to $2.6 million of provisions for the same period a year-ago. The increase in loan loss provision was primarily due to a $3.0 million specific loss allocation on a commercial real estate loan during the second quarter of 2011 and the $3.6 million charge-off of a single commercial loan relationship mentioned above during the third quarter of 2011. Additionally, the 2011 provision was also impacted by higher levels of non-performing loans, declining collateral values, and higher net loan charge-offs.

Net loan charge-offs during the first nine months of 2011 were $9.1 million, or 2.98% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $4.6 million, or 1.31% during the first nine months of 2010. Charge-offs in commercial loans totaled $3.6 million and represented 40% of the charge-offs during 2011. The $3.6 million of commercial loan charge-offs was related to the full charge-off of two loans to a sports franchise, of which $924 thousand were reserved for at year-end 2010 and $2.7 million were reserved for during 2011. Charge-offs in church loans totaled $1.8 million and represented 20% of the charge-offs during 2011. Of the $1.8 million of charge-offs in church loans, $387 thousand were reserved for at year-end 2010 and $1.4 million were reserved for during 2011. Charge-offs in consumer loans totaled $1.8 million and represented 20% of the charge-offs during 2011. The $1.8 million of charge-offs in consumer loans was mostly due to the write-off related to the settlement of litigation concerning a consumer loan secured by a deposit account. Of the $1.8 million of charge-offs in consumer loans, $1.5 million were reserved for at year-end 2010 and $327 thousand were reserved for during 2011. Charge-offs in commercial real estate, multi-family and one-to-four family residential real estate loans totaled $1.9 million and represented the remaining 20% of the charge-offs during

23

2011. Of the $1.9 million of charge-offs in commercial real estate, multi-family and one-to-four family residential real estate loans during 2011, $1.0 million were specifically reserved for at year-end 2010 and $837 thousand were specifically reserved for during 2011.

At September 30, 2011 our allowance for loan losses was $19.8 million, or 5.52% of our gross loans receivable, compared to $20.5 million, or 5.08% of our gross loans receivable, at year-end 2010. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans (“NPLs”), excluding loans held for sale, decreased to 47.67% at September 30, 2011, compared to 54.53% at year-end 2010. Despite the decrease in the allowance ratio, management believes that the remaining loss potential has been reduced as a result of our having already written down, by establishing specific reserves, or charged-off as necessary, 61% of the NPLs to their adjusted fair value less estimated selling costs.

Impaired loans at September 30, 2011 were $60.8 million compared to $58.0 million at December 31, 2010. Specific reserves for impaired loans were $6.5 million, or 10.64% of the aggregate impaired loan amount at September 30, 2011, compared to $6.0 million, or 10.39%, at December 31, 2010. Excluding specific reserves for impaired loans, our coverage ratio (general allowance as a percentage of total non-impaired loans) was 4.48% at September 30, 2011, compared to 4.19% at December 31, 2010. Our allowances for losses after considering reserves for loans held for sale and REO totaled $21.8 million at September 30, 2011, unchanged from year-end 2010.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011, but there can be no assurance that actual losses will not exceed the estimated amounts. In addition, the OCC and the FDIC periodically review the allowance for loan losses as an integral part of their examination process. These agencies may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments of the information available to them at the time of their examinations.

Non-interest Income

Non-interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 totaled $114 thousand compared to $1.0 million for the third quarter of 2010. The $909 thousand decrease from the third quarter of 2010 was primarily due to a $750 thousand financial assistance award received in the third quarter of 2010 from the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund. Also contributing to lower non-interest income in the third quarter of 2011 were lower service charges and higher net losses on mortgage banking activities.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, non-interest income totaled $494 thousand compared to $1.5 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in 2011 was primarily due to the $750 thousand of financial assistance award and a $105 thousand grant from CDFI, which were included in other non-interest income for 2010.

Non-interest Expense

Non-interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 totaled $5.1 million, compared to $4.6 million for the third quarter of 2010. Higher non-interest expense in the third quarter of 2011 was primarily due to higher provisions for losses on REO and loans held for sale. During the third quarter of 2011, provisions for losses on REO and loans held for sale totaled $2.0 million compared to $1.2 million for the same period a year ago and were reflective of declining real estate values.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, non-interest expense totaled $12.7 million compared to $12.0 million for the same period a year ago. The increase in non-interest expense during the first nine months of 2011 primarily reflected higher provisions for losses on REO, FDIC insurance expense, REO expenses, and appraisal expenses related to delinquent loans, which were partially offset by lower provision for losses on loans held for sale, compensation and benefits expense, and professional services expense.

Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate was (68.21)% and (23.20)% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 16.58% and 40.31% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Income taxes for interim periods are computed by applying the projected annual effective income tax rate including adjustments for discrete items incurred year-to-date. The Company’s change in its effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, versus the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, includes the impact of tax provision true-ups and an increase in the valuation allowance against its federal and state deferred tax assets due to the large net losses in the two quarters and the Company’s inability to project sufficient future taxable income.

24

Financial Condition

Total Assets

Total assets were $422.2 million at September 30, 2011, which represented a decrease of $61.7 million, or 13%, from December 31, 2010. During the first nine months of 2011, net loans decreased by $43.1 million, loans held for sale decreased by $14.2 million, securities decreased by $3.6 million, and deferred tax assets decreased by $2.5 million, while REO increased by $2.4 million.

Loan Portfolio

Our gross loan portfolio decreased by $44.1 million to $358.5 million at September 30, 2011 from $402.6 million at December 31, 2010, as loan repayments, foreclosures and charge-offs exceeded loan originations during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in our loan portfolio consisted of a $17.2 million decrease in our multi-family residential real estate loan portfolio, a $8.7 million decrease in our commercial real estate loan portfolio, a $5.5 million decrease in our church loan portfolio, a $4.9 million decrease in our one-to-four family residential real estate loan portfolio, a $4.3 million decrease in our commercial loan portfolio, a $2.3 million decrease in our consumer loan portfolio, and a $1.2 million decrease in our construction loan portfolio.

Loan originations for the first nine months of 2011 totaled $3.6 million compared to $17.1 million for the first nine months of 2010. Loan repayments for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $28.3 million compared to $25.3 million for the comparable period in 2010. Loans transferred to REO during the first nine months of 2011 totaled $7.7 million, compared to $4.4 million during the first nine months of 2010. Loans transferred to loans held for sale during the first nine months of 2011 totaled $2.5 million, compared to $1.4 million during the first nine months of 2010.

Loans held for sale decreased from $29.4 million at December 31, 2010 to $15.2 million at September 30, 2011. The $14.2 million decrease during the first nine months of 2011 was primarily due to performing loan sales of $10.9 million, which were sold at par, non-performing loan sales of $1.3 million and loan repayments of $3.5 million. Loans held for sale that were charged off or transferred to REO totaled $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Deposits

Deposits totaled $294.8 million at September 30, 2011, down $53.6 million, or 15%, from year-end 2010. During the first nine months of 2011, core deposits (NOW, demand, money market and passbook accounts) decreased by $14.8 million and represented 32% of total deposits at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Our certificates of deposit (“CDs”) decreased by $38.8 million during the first nine months of 2011 and represented 68% of total deposits at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The $38.8 million decrease in CDs was primarily due to maturities of $20.0 million of State of California CDs and a reduction of $8.3 million in brokered deposits. Over the past year, our funding strategy has included a plan to substantially eliminate brokered deposits, including deposits under the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”). To date, we have successfully reduced our brokered deposits to a level representing only 3% of total deposits at September 30, 2011, compared to 5% at December 31, 2010 and 10% at September 30, 2010.

Borrowings

Since the end of 2010, FHLB borrowings remained unchanged at $87.0 million, as we borrowed $7.0 million from the FHLB to repay $7.0 million of maturing advance. Subordinated debentures remained unchanged at $6.0 million and other borrowings remained unchanged at $5.0 million. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for further information on other borrowings.

25

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets (“NPAs”), comprised of NPLs and REO, were $53.3 million, or 12.63% of total assets, at September 30, 2011, compared to $46.5 million, or 9.60% of total assets, at December 31, 2010. During the first nine months of 2011, NPLs, including non-performing loans held for sale, increased by $4.6 million to $48.0 million from $43.4 million at the end of 2010. These loans consist of delinquent loans that are 90 days or more past due and troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) that do not qualify for accrual status. TDRs that have complied with the terms of their restructured agreements for a satisfactory period of time were returned to accruing status but are still considered impaired. Despite the increase in NPLs during the first nine months of 2011, our total delinquencies and our total classified loans, which include NPLs, decreased in number and dollar amount during the first nine months of 2011. In addition, at September 30, 2011, approximately $15.3 million, or 32%, of our NPLs were paying currently.

The NPLs included 28 church loans totaling $23.9 million, 16 commercial real estate loans totaling $9.9 million, 18 one-to-four family residential real estate loans totaling $8.1 million, 11 multi-family residential real estate loans totaling $5.5 million, a commercial loan for $285 thousand, and a land loan for $313 thousand. In addition to the NPLs discussed above, there were $20.7 million and $22.5 million of accruing TDRs at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These TDRs are on accrual status as the loans have complied with the terms of their restructured agreements for a period of six months or longer. Our progress in working with these borrowers is evidenced by the improvement in the performance of our TDRs since the end of 2009, when only $6.2 million of our TDRs were on accrual status.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, REO increased by $2.4 million to $5.4 million from $3.0 million at the end of 2010. At September 30, 2011 the Bank’s REO consisted of two one-to-four family residential properties and seven commercial real estate properties, three of which are church buildings. As part of our efforts to reduce non-performing assets, we sold fifteen REO properties for total proceeds of $3.7 million, and recorded a corresponding net loss of $56 thousand, during the first nine months of 2011.

Performance Ratios

The annualized returns on average equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were (104.17%) and (39.86%), compared to (1.87%) and 6.83% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The annualized returns on average assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were (6.89%) and (2.71%), compared to (0.12%) and 0.42% for the three and nine months September 30, 2010. The decrease in our annualized returns on average equity and average assets was primarily due to lower profitability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 as a result of higher provisions for losses and income tax expense.

The efficiency ratios for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were 71.03% and 73.30%, compared to 54.76% and 57.95% for the comparable periods in 2010. The deterioration in our efficiency ratio in 2011 was primarily due to lower net interest income, which was caused by higher levels of nonperforming assets and lower average interest-earning assets, and higher non-interest expenses related to higher levels of costs related to REO, increased premiums charged by the FDIC and higher appraisal costs.

Liquidity

The Bank’s primary source of funds is cash provided by principal and interest payments on loans and securities. In addition to cash provided by principal and interest payments on loans and securities, other sources of funds include cash provided by operating activities, deposits and borrowings.

Sources of funds for the Company on a stand-alone basis include distributions from the Bank and the issuance of equity and debt securities and other borrowings. The Company’s primary uses of funds include payment of dividends, payment of interest on its debt obligations and repurchases of common stock. Dividends and other capital distributions from the Bank, however, are subject to general regulatory restrictions and to the special restrictions arising under the cease and desist orders issued to the Bank and to the Company by the OTS that are summarized in Note (10) to our Financial Statements included in Part I of this Report and are further described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the cease and desist orders, neither the Bank nor the Company may declare or pay dividends, and the Company is not permitted to incur, issue, renew, repurchase, make payments on or increase any debt or redeem any capital stock, without prior notice to and receipt of written notice of non-objection from the OCC.

26

Net cash inflows from operating activities totaled $5.3 million and $8.6 million during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net cash inflows from operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were primarily attributable to payments received for interest on loans receivable.

Net cash inflows from investing activities totaled $47.0 million and $19.5 million during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net cash inflows from investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were attributable primarily to proceeds from sales of loans receivable held for sale, principal repayments on loans and residential mortgage-backed securities and proceeds from sales of REOs.

Net cash outflows from financing activities totaled ($53.3) million and ($13.4) million during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net cash outflows from financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were attributable primarily to the net decrease in deposits.

On February 28, 2010, we borrowed an aggregate of $5.0 million under our $5.0 million line of credit with another financial institution and invested all of the proceeds in the equity capital of the Bank. Borrowings under the line of credit are secured by the Company’s assets. The full amount of this borrowing became due and payable on July 31, 2010. This senior line of credit has not been repaid and we are now in default under the line of credit agreement. We do not have sufficient cash available to repay the borrowing at this time and would require approval of the OCC to make any payment on this senior line of credit or to obtain a dividend from the Bank for such purpose. On April 7, 2011, the Lender agreed to forbear from exercising its rights (other than increasing the interest rate by the default rate margin) until January 1, 2012 subject to certain conditions described in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We requested a six month extension of the forbearance to June 30, 2012 to provide more time to raise capital and convert a portion of the debt to common equity. There is no assurance that the lender will extend this forbearance beyond, January 1, 2012.

Capital Resources

On November 14, 2008, the Company issued 9,000 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, together with a ten-year warrant to purchase 183,175 shares of Company common stock at $7.37 per share, to the U.S. Treasury for gross proceeds of $9.0 million. The sale of the Senior Preferred Stock was made pursuant to the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program.

On December 8, 2009, the Company issued 6,000 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series E, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, to the U.S. Treasury for gross proceeds of $6.0 million. The sale of the Senior Preferred Stock was made pursuant to the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program.

We are pursuing our comprehensive recapitalization plan. To date, we have obtained, subject to documentation and certain terms and conditions:

• The consent of the U.S. Treasury to exchange our Series D and Series E Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock for common stock at a discount of 50% of the liquidation amount, plus an undiscounted exchange of the accumulated but unpaid dividends on such preferred stock for common stock;

• An agreement in principle with the holders of both the Series A and Series B Perpetual Preferred Stock to exchange their holdings for common stock at a discount of 50% of the liquidation amount;

• An agreement in principle with our senior bank lender to exchange a portion of our senior line of credit, which is currently in default, for common stock at 100% of the face amount to be exchanged and to forgive the accrued interest on the entire amount of the line of credit to the date of the exchange.

The conditions to each of the above exchanges include requirements that the holder of our outstanding Series C Noncumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock concurrently exchange such preferred stock for our common stock on similar terms and that we concurrently complete private placements or other sales of our common stock aggregating

27

$5 million or more in gross proceeds. Based on the agreements in principle that we have reached, we anticipate that these transactions would, if completed, result in the issuance of approximately 7.5 million new shares of our common stock, which would constitute approximately 80% of the pro forma outstanding shares of our common stock. The 7.5 million new shares of common stock exceed the Company’s current unissued and authorized shares. The Company plans to obtain existing shareholders approval to increase the Company’s authorized shares.

There can be no assurance that management’s capital plan will be achieved. If the Company is unable to raise capital, management plans to continue to shrink assets, sell the headquarters building, decrease NPAs and implement strategies to increase earnings.

Regulatory Capital

The capital regulations applicable to the Bank, which are now administered by the OCC, include three separate minimum capital requirements. First, the tangible capital requirement mandates that the Bank’s stockholder’s equity, less intangible assets, be at least 1.50% of adjusted total assets as defined in the capital regulations. Second, the core capital requirement currently mandates that core capital (tangible capital plus certain qualifying intangible assets) be at least 4.00% of adjusted total assets as defined in the capital regulations. Third, the risk-based capital requirement presently mandates that core capital plus supplemental capital (as defined by the OCC) be at least 8.00% of risk-weighted assets as prescribed in the capital regulations. The capital regulations assign specific risk weightings to all assets and off-balance- sheet items for this purpose.

The Bank was in compliance with all capital requirements in effect at September 30, 2011, and met the generally applicable capital ratio standards necessary to be considered “well-capitalized” under the prompt corrective action regulations adopted pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991. However, in March 2010, the Company and the Bank were determined to be “in troubled condition” by the OTS and they consented to the issuance to them of cease and desist orders by the OTS effective September 9, 2010, which orders remain in effect and are now administered by the OCC. The cease and desist orders require the Bank to achieve and maintain higher levels of regulatory capital than normally required. Under the applicable regulations, the Bank is therefore precluded from being considered to be more than “adequately capitalized” until such special capital requirements are terminated and the Company and the Bank are no longer considered to be “in troubled condition.”

Actual and normally required capital amounts and ratios at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, together with the higher capital requirements that the Bank is required to meet under the cease and desist order applicable to it, are presented below.

	Actual					Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations					Capital Requirements under Cease and Desist Order
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratios			Amount		Ratios
	(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2011:
Tangible Capital to adjusted total assets	$	34,439		8.16	%	$	6,328		1.50	%		N/A		N/A			N/A		N/A
Tier 1(Core) Capital to adjusted total assets	$	34,439		8.16	%	$	16,876		4.00	%	$	21,095		5.00	%	$	33,752		8.00	%
Tier 1(Core) Capital to risk weighted assets	$	34,439		10.92	%		N/A		N/A		$	18,921		6.00	%		N/A		N/A
Total Capital to risk weighted assets	$	38,505		12.21	%	$	25,228		8.00	%	$	31,534		10.00	%	$	37,841		12.00	%
December 31, 2010:
Tangible Capital to adjusted total assets	$	42,630		8.82	%	$	7,252		1.50	%		N/A		N/A			N/A		N/A
Tier 1(Core) Capital to adjusted total assets	$	42,630		8.82	%	$	19,338		4.00	%	$	24,172		5.00	%	$	38,676		8.00	%
Tier 1(Core) Capital to risk weighted assets	$	42,630		11.76	%		N/A		N/A		$	21,754		6.00	%		N/A		N/A
Total Capital to risk weighted assets	$	47,299		13.05	%	$	29,006		8.00	%	$	36,257		10.00	%	$	43,508		12.00	%

28

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of September 30, 2011, an evaluation was performed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011. There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to September 30, 2011.

29

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

OTS Investigation

In 2010, the OTS notified us that it had initiated a formal investigation of the activities of a former loan officer of the Bank whose employment was terminated in March 2010. In connection with the investigation, the OTS issued subpoenas to the chief lending officer and chief executive officer requesting documents relating to our former loan officer and loans he originated while employed by the Bank. The subpoenas also contemplate taking oral testimony from the officers. While the OTS did not inform us of the scope of its investigation, we believe the investigation includes, but may not be limited to, inquiry into whether documentation submitted in connection with loan applications for loans originated by the loan officer contained inaccurate or deliberately falsified information and whether the loan officer received unauthorized direct or indirect benefits from payments made by the borrowers on such loans to loan brokers or other persons associated with the lending process. All of the loans originated by the former loan officer have been reviewed by us and by the independent loan review firm we engaged to perform a general review of our loan portfolio pursuant to the C&D issued to us by the OTS. See “Item 1. Business — Regulation — Cease and Desist Orders of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.” We have taken the results of these loan reviews into account, along with all other relevant information known to us, in determining the amounts of our loan loss provisions and the level of our loan loss reserves that we believe to be appropriate as of September 30, 2011.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

None

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

Item 4. RESERVED

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

Item 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit 31.1—	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.2—	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32—	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document (1)
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document (1)

30

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)

(1) Pursuant to SEC rules, these interactive data file exhibits shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act or Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of those sections.

31

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: December 21, 2011	By:	/s/    Paul C. Hudson
	Paul C. Hudson Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 21, 2011	By:	/s/    Samuel Sarpong
	Samuel Sarpong Chief Financial Officer

32

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Paul C. Hudson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadway Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 21, 2011	By:	/s/    Paul C. Hudson
	Paul C. Hudson Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Samuel Sarpong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadway Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 21, 2011	By:	/s/    Samuel Sarpong
	Samuel Sarpong Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: December 21, 2011	By:	/s/    Paul C. Hudson
		Paul C. Hudson Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 21, 2011	By:	/s/    Samuel Sarpong
		Samuel Sarpong Chief Financial Officer

XML

Securities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Securities [Abstract]

Securities

NOTE (4) – Securities

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities portfolios at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains which are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), for available-for-sale investment securities, were as follows:

	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
Residential mortgage-backed	$	8,113	$	499	$	—	$	8,612
Total available-for-sale	$	8,113	$	499	$	—	$	8,612
Held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed	$	10,000	$	429	$	—	$	10,429
U.S. Government and federal agency		1,000		80		—		1,080
Total held-to-maturity	$	11,000	$	509	$	—	$	11,509

	December 31, 2010
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
Residential mortgage-backed	$	10,085	$	439	$	—	$	10,524
Total available-for-sale	$	10,085	$	439	$	—	$	10,524
Held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed	$	11,737	$	425	$	—	$	12,162
U.S. Government and federal agency		1,000		99		—		1,099
Total held-to-maturity	$	12,737	$	524	$	—	$	13,261

The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolios are shown by contractual maturity at September 30, 2011. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily residential mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately.

	Available-for-Sale				Held-to-Maturity
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Maturity	(In thousands)
Within one year	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
One to five years		—		—		1,000		1,080
Five to ten years		—		—		—		—
Beyond ten years		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage-backed		8,113		8,612		10,000		10,429
Total	$	8,113	$	8,612	$	11,000	$	11,509

Securities pledged at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 had a carrying amount of $11.0 million and $12.7 million and were pledged to secure public deposits and FHLB advances. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders' equity. There were no sales of securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

There were no securities with unrealized losses at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. We evaluate securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the cost, and our intent and ability to retain our investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer's financial condition, we consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer's financial condition.

XML

Earnings Per Common Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Earnings Per Common Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Common Share

NOTE (3) – Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, increased for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents.

The following table shows how the Company computed basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share)
Basic
Net earnings (loss)	$	(7,534	)	$	(156	)	$	(9,385	)	$	1,678
Less: Preferred stock dividends and accretion		(264	)		(282	)		(830	)		(863	)
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(7,798	)	$	(438	)	$	(10,215	)	$	815
Weighted average common shares outstanding		1,744,565			1,743,965			1,744,251			1,743,649
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(4.47	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(5.86	)	$	0.47
Diluted
Net earnings (loss)	$	(7,534	)	$	(156	)	$	(9,385	)	$	1,678
Less: Preferred stock dividends and accretion		(264	)		(282	)		(830	)		(863	)
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(7,798	)	$	(438	)	$	(10,215	)	$	815
Weighted average common shares outstanding		1,744,565			1,743,965			1,744,251			1,743,649
Add: dilutive effects of assumed exercises of stock options		N/A			N/A			N/A			1,319
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares		1,744,565			1,743,965			1,744,251			1,744,967
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(4.47	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(5.86	)	$	0.47

Stock options for 227,075 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and stock options for 237,547 and 223,547 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 because they were anti-dilutive.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Assets
Cash	$ 13,735	$ 8,203
Federal funds sold	7,240	13,775
Cash and cash equivalents	20,975	21,978
Securities available for sale, at fair value	8,612	10,524
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $11,509 at September 30, 2011 and $13,261 at December 31, 2010)	11,000	12,737
Loans receivable held-for-sale, net	15,212	29,411
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $19,805 and $20,458	339,479	382,616
Accrued interest receivable	1,759	2,216
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost	4,089	4,089
Office properties and equipment, net	4,821	5,094
Real estate owned (REO), net	5,385	3,036
Bank owned life insurance	2,588	2,522
Deferred tax assets	2,873	5,369
Other assets	5,444	4,338
Total assets	422,237	483,930
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Deposits	294,850	348,445
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	87,000	87,000
Junior subordinated debentures	6,000	6,000
Other borrowings	5,000	5,000
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	584	272
Other liabilities	5,768	4,353
Total liabilities	399,202	451,070
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock discount	(1,092)	(1,380)
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 8,000,000 shares at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; issued 2,013,942 shares at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; outstanding 1,744,565 shares at September 30, 2011 and 1,743,965 shares at December 31, 2010	20	20
Additional paid-in capital	14,460	14,395
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	(2,141)	8,074
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes of $206 at September 30, 2011 and $176 at December 31, 2010	293	263
Treasury stock-at cost, 269,377 shares at September 30, 2011 and 269,977 shares at December 31, 2010	(3,444)	(3,451)
Total stockholders' equity	23,035	32,860
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	422,237	483,930
Noncumulative preferred stock
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred non-voting stock, value	2	2
Series D | Cumulative preferred stock
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred non-voting stock, value	8,963	8,963
Series E | Cumulative preferred stock
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred non-voting stock, value	$ 5,974	$ 5,974

XML

Basis Of Financial Statement Presentation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Basis Of Financial Statement Presentation [Abstract]

Basis Of Financial Statement Presentation

NOTE (1) – Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include Broadway Financial Corporation (the "Company") and its wholly owned subsidiary, Broadway Federal Bank, f.s.b. (the "Bank"). Also included in the unaudited consolidated financial statements is Broadway Service Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. These unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all disclosures associated with the Company's consolidated annual financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and, accordingly, should be read in conjunction with such audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (all of which are normal and recurring in nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

Some items in the consolidated financial statements for the prior period were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

XML

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

NOTE (2) – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, A Creditor's Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, updated to amend previous guidance with respect to troubled debt restructurings. This updated guidance is designed to assist creditors with determining whether or not a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. In particular, additional guidance has been added to help creditors determine whether a concession has been granted and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. Both of these conditions are required to be met for a restructuring to constitute a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in the update are effective for the first interim period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. Adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 addresses convergence between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") requirements for measurement of and disclosures about fair value. The amendments are not expected to have a significant impact on companies applying U.S. GAAP. Key provisions of the amendment include: a prohibition on grouping financial instruments for purposes of determining fair value, except when an entity manages market and credit risks on the basis of the entity's net exposure to the group; an extension of the prohibition against the use of a blockage factor to all fair value measurements (that prohibition currently applies only to financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets); and a requirement that for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements, entities disclose quantitative information about unobservable inputs, a description of the valuation process used and qualitative details about the sensitivity of the measurements. In addition, for items not carried at fair value but for which fair value is disclosed, entities will be required to disclose the level within the fair value hierarchy that applies to the fair value measurement disclosed. The amendments in ASU 2011-04 are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which will require companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. It eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 does not change the items which must be reported in other comprehensive income, how such items are measured, or when they must be reclassified to net income. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Since the provisions of ASU 2011-05 are presentation related only, the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Securities held to maturity, fair value	$ 11,509	$ 13,261
Loans receivable, allowance	19,805	20,458
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	8,000,000	8,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	2,013,942	2,013,942
Common stock, shares outstanding	1,744,565	1,743,965
Accumulated other comprehensive income, tax	206	176
Treasury stock, shares	269,377	269,977
Cumulative preferred stock | Series D
Preferred non-voting stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred non-voting stock, shares authorized	9,000	9,000
Preferred non-voting stock, shares issued	9,000	9,000
Preferred non-voting stock, shares outstanding	9,000	9,000
Preferred stock, liquidation preference	9,619	9,281
Cumulative preferred stock | Series E
Preferred non-voting stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred non-voting stock, shares authorized	6,000	6,000
Preferred non-voting stock, shares issued	6,000	6,000
Preferred non-voting stock, shares outstanding	6,000	6,000
Preferred stock, liquidation preference	6,412	6,188
Noncumulative preferred stock
Preferred non-voting stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred non-voting stock, shares authorized	1,000,000	1,000,000
Noncumulative preferred stock | Series A
Preferred non-voting stock, shares issued	55,199	55,199
Preferred non-voting stock, shares outstanding	55,199	55,199
Preferred stock, liquidation preference	552	552
Noncumulative preferred stock | Series B
Preferred non-voting stock, shares issued	100,000	100,000
Preferred non-voting stock, shares outstanding	100,000	100,000
Preferred stock, liquidation preference	1,000	1,000
Noncumulative preferred stock | Series C
Preferred non-voting stock, shares issued	76,950	76,950
Preferred non-voting stock, shares outstanding	76,950	76,950
Preferred stock, liquidation preference	$ 1,000	$ 1,000

XML

Going Concern

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Going Concern [Abstract]

Going Concern

NOTE (12) – Going Concern

The Company's financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going-concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. However, the Company has a tax sharing liability to the Bank which exceeds operating cash at the Company level. We are working with our primary regulator to determine when this liability must be settled. Additionally, the Company is in default under the terms of a $5 million line of credit with another financial institution lender (see Note 7), although that lender has agreed to forbear from exercising its rights to foreclose on the Bank until January 1, 2012, subject to certain conditions.

If additional such forbearances on the line of credit cannot be obtained, or if the tax sharing payment from the Company to the Bank is determined to be due prior to the time that the Company is able to raise additional capital, the Company's cash position will be affected negatively and it will run out of operating cash. Due to the current regulatory order that is in effect, the Bank is not allowed to make distributions to the Company without regulatory approval, and such approval is not likely to be given. Therefore, the Company would not be able to meet its payment obligations within the foreseeable future unless the Company is able to secure new capital and/or obtain requisite forbearances from its lender. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Management's plan to address the conditions described above is to raise additional equity capital for the Company. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the timely implementation and success of this plan. Although management presently believes that this plan can be effectively implemented during 2012, there can be no assurance that management's plan will be achieved.

XML

Document And Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 13, 2011
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Entity Central Index Key	0001001171
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Registrant Name	BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORP \DE\
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		1,744,565

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Operations And Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Consolidated Statements Of Operations And Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) [Abstract]
Interest and fees on loans receivable	$ 6,062	$ 7,231	$ 18,730	$ 22,186
Interest on mortgage backed and other securities	176	228	539	767
Other interest income	9	16	28	41
Total interest income	6,247	7,475	19,297	22,994
Interest on deposits	1,056	1,492	3,492	4,563
Interest on borrowings	859	865	2,699	2,511
Total interest expense	1,915	2,357	6,191	7,074
Net interest income before provision for loan losses	4,332	5,118	13,106	15,920
Provision for loan losses	3,814	1,740	8,488	2,623
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	518	3,378	4,618	13,297
Non-interest income:
Service charges	176	275	533	677
Net gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities	(80)	13	(73)	(72)
Net losses on sale of REO	(7)	(53)	(56)	(88)
Other	25	788	90	962
Total non-interest income	114	1,023	494	1,479
Non-interest expense:
Compensation and benefits	1,618	1,696	4,982	5,423
Occupancy expense, net	330	359	1,018	1,069
Information services	200	198	647	602
Professional services	284	214	744	810
Provision for losses on loans held-for-sale	702	556	728	1,103
Provision for losses on REO	1,251	669	2,033	780
FDIC insurance	144	233	781	695
Office services and supplies	135	147	417	424
Other	447	516	1,380	1,059
Total non-interest expense	5,111	4,588	12,730	11,965
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	(4,479)	(187)	(7,618)	2,811
Income tax expense (benefit)	3,055	(31)	1,767	1,133
Net earnings (loss)	(7,534)	(156)	(9,385)	1,678
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale	(11)	(122)	60	135
Income tax effect	(2)	49	(30)	(54)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(13)	(73)	30	81
Comprehensive earnings (loss)	(7,547)	(229)	(9,355)	1,759
Net earnings (loss)	(7,534)	(156)	(9,385)	1,678
Dividends and discount accretion on preferred stock	(264)	(282)	(830)	(863)
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders	$ (7,798)	$ (438)	$ (10,215)	$ 815
Earnings (loss) per common share-basic	$ (4.47)	$ (0.25)	$ (5.86)	$ 0.47
Earnings (loss) per common share-diluted	$ (4.47)	$ (0.25)	$ (5.86)	$ 0.47
Dividends declared per share-common stock				$ 0.01

XML

Junior Subordinated Debentures, Other Borrowings And Management's Capital Plan

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Junior Subordinated Debentures, Other Borrowings And Management's Capital Plan [Abstract]

Junior Subordinated Debentures, Other Borrowings And Management's Capital Plan

NOTE (7) – Junior Subordinated Debentures, Other Borrowings and Management's Capital Plan

On March 17, 2004, the Company issued $6.0 million of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures in a private placement. The debentures mature in 10 years and interest is payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the 3-month LIBOR plus 2.54%. The interest rate is determined as of each March 17, June 17, September 17, and December 17, and was 2.89% at September 30, 2011. The Company stopped paying interest on the debentures and the senior line of credit discussed below in September 2010. As disclosed previously, the Company is not permitted to make payments on any debts without prior notice to and receipt of written notice of non-objection from the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") Regional Director. In addition, under the terms of the subordinated debentures, the Company is not allowed to make payments on the subordinated debentures if the Company is in default on any of its senior indebtedness, which term includes the senior line of credit described below.

On February 28, 2010, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $5.0 million under its $5.0 million line of credit with another financial institution, and invested all of the proceeds in the equity capital of the Bank. The interest rate on the line of credit adjusts annually, subject to a minimum of 6.00% and increases by an additional 5% in the event of default. Borrowings under this line of credit are secured by the Company's assets. The full amount of this borrowing became due and payable on July 31, 2010. This senior line of credit has not been repaid and the Company is now in default under the line of credit agreement. On April 7, 2011, the lender agreed to forbear from exercising its rights (other than increasing the interest rate by the default rate margin) pursuant to the line of credit agreement until January 1, 2012 subject to the following conditions:

• The Company shall make a forbearance payment in the amount of $25,000 to the lender no later than July 31, 2011 provided that the Company is able to obtain the necessary approval to make such payment from the OTS or its successors, and in the event the Company is unable to obtain such approval by said date, the Company shall make such payment as soon as permitted thereafter. The Company has not received the required regulatory approval for such payment to date.

• The Company shall use its best efforts to continue to attempt to raise a minimum of $5.0 million in private placements under the Company's Recapitalization Plan as discussed below.

• The Bank shall not experience anything that would constitute an Event of Default, or be placed into receivership by the FDIC.

The Company is pursuing a comprehensive recapitalization plan to improve the Company's capital structure. To date, the Company has obtained the written consent of the U.S. Treasury to exchange the Company's Series D and Series E Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock for common stock at a discount of 50% of the liquidation amount, plus an undiscounted exchange of the accumulated but unpaid dividends on such preferred stock for common stock. In addition, the Company is in negotiations with the holders of Series A and Series B Perpetual Preferred Stock and Series C Noncumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock to exchange their holdings for common stock at a discount of 50% of the liquidation amount. The Company is also in negotiations with the lender to exchange a portion of the Company's senior line of credit, which is currently in default, for common stock at 100% of the face amount to be exchanged and to forgive the accrued interest on the entire amount of the line of credit to the date of the exchange.

The Company plans to concurrently complete private placements or other sales of the Company's common stock aggregating $5 million or more in gross proceeds. The Company anticipates that these transactions would, if completed, result in the issuance of approximately 7.5 million new shares of the Company's common stock, which would constitute approximately 80% of the pro forma outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. The 7.5 million new shares of common stock exceed the Company's current unissued and authorized shares. The Company plans to obtain existing shareholders approval to increase the Company's authorized shares.

There can be no assurance that management's capital plan will be achieved. If the Company is unable to raise capital, management plans to continue to shrink assets, sell the headquarters building, decrease NPAs and implement strategies to increase earnings. Failure to maintain capital sufficient to meet the higher capital requirements could result in further regulatory action.

XML

Loans Receivable

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Loans Receivable [Abstract]

Loans Receivable

NOTE (6) – Loans Receivable

Loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Real estate:
One to four units	$	77,876		$	82,764
Five or more units		111,294			128,534
Commercial real estate		64,094			72,770
Church		92,149			97,634
Construction		4,230			5,421
Commercial:
Sports		2,000			5,768
Other		5,876			6,410
Consumer:
Loan on savings		1,006			3,259
Other		13			29
Total gross loans receivable		358,538			402,589
Less:
Loans in process		119			371
Net deferred loan fees (costs)		(883	)		(889	)
Unamortized discounts		18			33
Allowance for loan losses		19,805			20,458
Loans receivable, net	$	339,479		$	382,616

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:

	For the three months ended September 30, 2011
	One to four units			Five or more units			Commercial real estate			Church			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	4,229		$	2,892		$	6,253		$	7,197		$	68		$	1,538		$	68		$	22,245
Provision for loan losses		181			249			204			564			(1	)		2,627			(10	)		3,814
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—			15			15
Loans charged off		(519	)		(289	)		(207	)		(1,623	)		—			(3,631	)		—			(6,269	)
Ending balance	$	3,891		$	2,852		$	6,250		$	6,138		$	67		$	534		$	73		$	19,805

	For the nine months ended September 30, 2011
	One to four units			Five or more units			Commercial real estate			Church			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	4,579		$	2,469		$	3,493		$	6,909		$	74		$	1,300		$	1,634		$	20,458
Provision for loan losses		(64	)		821			3,573			1,041			(7	)		2,865			259			8,488
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—			23			23
Loans charged off		(624	)		(438	)		(816	)		(1,812	)		—			(3,631	)		(1,843	)		(9,164	)
Ending balance	$	3,891		$	2,852		$	6,250		$	6,138		$	67		$	534		$	73		$	19,805

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was as follows:

	For the three months ended September 30, 2010			For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	18,462		$	20,460
Provision for loan losses		1,740			2,623
Recoveries		3			3
Loans charged off		(1,723	)		(4,604	)
Ending balance	$	18,482		$	18,482

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011
	One to four units		Five or more units		Commercial real estate		Church		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	858	$	139	$	3,259	$	1,927	$	—	$	285	$	—	$	6,468
Collectively evaluated for impairment		3,033		2,713		2,991		4,211		67		249		73		13,337
Total ending allowance balance	$	3,891	$	2,852	$	6,250	$	6,138	$	67	$	534	$	73	$	19,805
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	13,393	$	4,277	$	12,340	$	30,169	$	313	$	285	$	—	$	60,777
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		64,483		107,017		51,754		61,980		3,917		7,591		1,019		297,761
Total ending loans balance	$	77,876	$	111,294	$	64,094	$	92,149	$	4,230	$	7,876	$	1,019	$	358,538

	December 31, 2010
	One to four units		Five or more units		Commercial real estate		Church		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	423	$	69	$	935	$	2,118	$	—	$	942	$	1,541	$	6,028
Collectively evaluated for impairment		4,156		2,400		2,558		4,791		74		358		93		14,430
Total ending allowance balance	$	4,579	$	2,469	$	3,493	$	6,909	$	74	$	1,300	$	1,634	$	20,458
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	9,962	$	2,260	$	13,206	$	26,251	$	320	$	3,768	$	2,265	$	58,032
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		72,802		126,274		59,564		71,383		5,101		8,410		1,023		344,557
Total ending loans balance	$	82,764	$	128,534	$	72,770	$	97,634	$	5,421	$	12,178	$	3,288	$	402,589

The following table presents information related to impaired loans by class of loans as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:

	September 30, 2011
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Cash Basis Interest Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
One to four units	$	5,686	$	4,082	$	—	$	4,922	$	—	$	—
Five or more units		3,393		3,306		—		2,239		—		—
Commercial real estate		7,586		7,221		—		10,444		134		132
Church		17,286		15,324		—		15,660		93		92
Construction		313		313		—		317		—		—
Commercial:
Sports		4,000		—		—		3,336		—		—
Consumer:
Loan on savings		—		—		—		1,035		—		—
With an allowance recorded:
One to four units		9,649		9,311		858		5,236		227		227
Five or more units		971		971		139		742		18		18
Commercial real estate		5,119		5,119		3,259		2,173		—		—
Church		15,099		14,845		1,927		14,130		486		464
Commercial:
Other		285		285		285		259		—		—
Total	$	69,387	$	60,777	$	6,468	$	60,493	$	958	$	933

The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable and loan origination fees, net due to immateriality. For purposes of this disclosure, the unpaid principal balance is not reduced for net charge-offs. Interest income recognized during impairment represents interest income earned on performing TDRs. Cash-basis interest income recognized represents cash received for interest payments on performing TDRs.

The following table presents information related to impaired loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2010:

	December 31, 2010
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
One to four units	$	7,953	$	5,991	$	—
Five or more units		600		586		—
Commercial real estate		8,409		8,133		—
Church		11,782		11,161		—
Construction		320		320		—
With an allowance recorded:
One to four units		4,129		3,971		423
Five or more units		1,674		1,674		69
Commercial real estate		5,072		5,073		935
Church		15,183		15,090		2,118
Commercial:
Sports		4,000		3,768		942
Other		—		—		—
Consumer:
Loan on savings		2,249		2,249		1,525
Other		16		16		16
Total	$	61,387	$	58,032	$	6,028

	For the nine months  ended September 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Average recorded investment in impaired loans	$	49,146
Interest income recognized during impairment		1,062
Cash basis interest income recognized		826

The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Loans receivable, held for sale:
Five or more units	$	1,559	$	385
Commercial real estate		413		—
Church		4,436		5,533
Loans receivable, net:
One to four-units		8,095		6,227
Five or more units		3,888		1,865
Commercial real estate		9,487		10,321
Church		19,481		12,748
Construction		313		320
Commercial:
Sports		—		3,768
Other		285		—
Consumer:
Loan on Savings		—		2,249
Other		—		16
Total nonaccrual loans	$	47,957	$	43,432

There were no loans 90 days or more delinquent that were accruing interest as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans, including loans held for sale, as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011 by class of loans:

	September 30, 2011
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Loans Not Past Due
	(In thousands)
Loans receivable, held for sale:
Five or more units	$	991	$	—	$	1,559	$	2,550	$	3,913
Commercial real estate		274		—		413		687		1,377
Church		778		—		4,436		5,214		2,779
Loans receivable, net:
One to four units		1,643		1,926		8,095		11,664		66,212
Five or more units		172		—		3,888		4,060		107,234
Commercial real estate		2,776		—		9,487		12,263		51,831
Church		3,339		2,757		19,481		25,577		66,572
Construction		120		—		313		433		3,797
Commercial:
Sports		—		—		—		—		2,000
Other		131		27		285		443		5,433
Consumer:
Loan on savings		—		—		—		—		1,006
Other		—		—		—		—		13
Total	$	10,224	$	4,710	$	47,957	$	62,891	$	312,167
	December 31, 2010
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Loans Not Past Due
	(In thousands)
Loans receivable, held for sale:
Five or more units	$	1,209	$	—	$	385	$	1,594	$	14,623
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		5,067
Church		—		—		5,533		5,533		3,875
Loans receivable, net:
One to four units	$	2,716	$	71	$	6,227	$	9,014	$	73,750
Five or more units		805		1,068		1,865		3,738		124,796
Commercial real estate		769		1,287		10,321		12,377		60,393
Church		12,914		5,230		12,748		30,892		66,742
Construction		898		—		320		1,218		4,203
Commercial:
Sports		—		—		3,768		3,768		2,000
Other		325		—		—		325		6,085
Consumer:
Loan on savings		—		—		2,249		2,249		1,010
Other		—		—		16		16		13
Total	$	19,636	$	7,656	$	43,432	$	70,724	$	362,557

Troubled Debt Restructurings

        On July 1, 2011, the Company adopted the guidance in ASU, 2011-02, "A Creditor's Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring" which clarifies the guidance on a creditor's evaluation of whether it has granted a concession in a debt restructuring and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties in evaluating whether the debt restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The guidance in ASU 2011-02 was effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying this guidance, the Company did not identify receivables that were newly considered impaired.

The Company has allocated $1.4 million and $1.6 million of specific reserves for loans the terms of which have been modified in troubled debt restructurings and were performing as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. At September 30, 2011, loans classified as a TDR totaled $36.4 million, of which $15.6 million were included in nonaccrual loans and $20.8 million were on accrual status. At December 31, 2010, loans classified as a TDR totaled $37.1 million, of which $14.6 million were included in nonaccrual loans and $22.5 million were on accrual status. TDRs on accrual status are comprised of loans that were accruing at the time of restructuring or loans that have complied with the terms of their restructured agreements for a satisfactory period of time, and for which the Bank anticipates full repayment of both principal and interest. TDRs that are on non-accrual can be returned to accrual status after a period of sustained performance, generally determined to be six months of timely payments as modified. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has no commitment to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings.

During the nine months ending September 30, 2011, the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings. The modification of the terms of such loans involved a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan for periods ranging from 18 months to 5 years.

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the nine months ending September 30, 2011:

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
One to four units		6	$	4,354	$	4,360
Five or more units		1		494		459
Commercial real estate		1		418		418
Church		7		7,441		6,915
Total		15	$	12,707	$	12,152

The troubled debt restructurings described above increased the allowance for loan losses by $652 thousand and resulted in charge offs of $1.0 million during the nine months ending September 30, 2011.

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification during the nine months ending September 30, 2011:

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate		1	$	418
Total		1	$	418

A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms.

The troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted described above resulted in a charge off of $207 thousand during the nine months ending September 30, 2011.

The terms of certain other loans were modified during the nine months ending September 30, 2011 that did not meet the definition of a troubled debt restructuring. These loans have a total recorded investment as of September 30, 2011 of $3.2 million. The modification of these loans involved either a modification of the terms of a loan to borrowers who were not experiencing financial difficulties or an extension of the maturity date for periods ranging from 3 months to 10 years at a stated rate of interest equal to the current market rate for new debt with similar risk.

In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the company's internal underwriting policy.

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed at least on a quarterly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

• Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some future date.

• Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

• Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

• Loss. Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that to continue to carry the loan as an active asset is no longer warranted.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:

	As of September 30, 2011
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss
	(In thousands)
One to four units	$	64,553	$	3,058	$	10,265	$	—	$	—
Five or more units		99,247		6,515		5,532		—		—
Commercial real estate		42,146		6,379		15,491		79		—
Church		38,443		11,611		42,054		41		—
Construction		1,046		2,871		313		—		—
Commercial:
Sports		—		2,000		—		—		—
Other		2,600		2,892		384		—		—
Consumer:
Loan on savings		1,006		—		—		—		—
Other		13		—		—		—		—
Total	$	249,053	$	35,326	$	74,039	$	120	$	—

	As of December 31, 2010
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss
	(In thousands)
One to four units	$	71,846	$	2,440	$	8,478	$	—	$	—
Five or more units		118,490		6,412		3,632		—		—
Commercial real estate		46,692		5,281		20,797		—		—
Church		42,931		14,229		40,204		270		—
Construction		4,203		320		898		—		—
Commercial:
Sports		—		2,000		3,768		—		—
Other		925		4,870		615		—		—
Consumer:
Loan on savings		1,010		—		2,249		—		—
Other		13		—		—		—		16
Total	$	286,110	$	35,552	$	80,641	$	270	$	16

XML

Regulatory Matters

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Regulatory Matters [Abstract]

Regulatory Matters

NOTE (10) – Regulatory Matters

The Bank is subject to regulatory capital requirements now administered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or OCC, which is the statutory successor under the Dodd-Frank Act to the former Office of Thrift Supervision, or OTS. The capital requirements, which remain the same as when administered by the OTS, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the OCC. Failure to meet capital requirements can result in regulatory action.

Prompt corrective action regulations also administered by the OCC provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If only adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.

The Company and the Bank have consented to the issuance to them of cease and desist orders by the OTS effective September 9, 2010 requiring, among other things, that the Company and the Bank take remedial actions to improve the Bank's loan underwriting and internal asset review procedures, to reduce the amount of its non-performing assets and to improve other aspects of the Bank's business, as well as the Company's management of its business and the oversight of the Company's business by the Board. The cease and desist orders require the Bank to attain, and thereafter maintain, a Tier 1 (Core) Capital to Adjusted Total Assets ratio of at least 8% and a Total Risk-Based Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets ratio of at least 12%, both of which ratios are greater than the respective 6% and 10% levels for such ratios that are generally required under OTS (now OCC) regulations. The cease and desist orders also prohibit the Bank from paying dividends to the Company, and prohibit the Company from paying dividends to its stockholders, without the prior written approval of the OCC. In addition, the Company is not permitted to incur, issue, renew, repurchase, make payments on or increase any debt or redeem any capital stock without prior notice to and receipt of written notice of non-objection from the OCC.

We have met the minimum capital requirements at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 to conform to the general regulatory definition of "well-capitalized" under the prompt corrective action regulations, however we cannot be considered well capitalized while under the cease and desist order.

Actual and normally required capital amounts and ratios at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, together with the higher capital requirements that the Bank is required to meet under the cease and desist order applicable to it, are presented below.

	Actual					Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations					Capital Requirements under Cease and Desist Order
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratios			Amount		Ratios
	(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2011:
Tangible Capital to adjusted total assets	$	34,439		8.16	%	$	6,328		1.50	%		N/A		N/A			N/A		N/A
Tier 1(Core) Capital to adjusted total assets	$	34,439		8.16	%	$	16,876		4.00	%	$	21,095		5.00	%	$	33,752		8.00	%
Tier 1(Core) Capital to risk weighted assets	$	34,439		10.92	%		N/A		N/A		$	18,921		6.00	%		N/A		N/A
Total Capital to risk weighted assets	$	38,505		12.21	%	$	25,228		8.00	%	$	31,534		10.00	%	$	37,841		12.00	%
December 31, 2010:
Tangible Capital to adjusted total assets	$	42,630		8.82	%	$	7,252		1.50	%		N/A		N/A			N/A		N/A
Tier 1(Core) Capital to adjusted total assets	$	42,630		8.82	%	$	19,338		4.00	%	$	24,172		5.00	%	$	38,676		8.00	%
Tier 1(Core) Capital to risk weighted assets	$	42,630		11.76	%		N/A		N/A		$	21,754		6.00	%		N/A		N/A
Total Capital to risk weighted assets	$	47,299		13.05	%	$	29,006		8.00	%	$	36,257		10.00	%	$	43,508		12.00	%

XML

Fair Value

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Fair Value [Abstract]

Fair Value

NOTE (8) – Fair Value

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:

The fair values of securities available-for-sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities' relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).

The fair value of non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale is generally based upon the fair value of the collateral which is obtained from recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Impaired loans, other than performing TDRs, are generally collateral dependent and, as such, are carried at the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. Fair values are estimated through current appraisals, broker opinions or automated valuation models and adjusted as necessary, by management, to reflect current market conditions and, as such, are classified as Level 3.

Nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as real estate owned ("REO") are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.

Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

			Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2011 Using
	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available-for-sale - residential mortgage-backed	$	8,612	$	—	$	8,612	$	—

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using
	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available-for-sale - residential mortgage-backed	$	10,524	$	—	$	10,524	$	—

Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis

The following table provides information regarding the carrying values of our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at the dates indicated. The fair value measurement for all of these assets falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

	Carrying Value at
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale, net:
Five or more units	$	1,533	$	366
Commercial real estate		215		—
Church		3,750		4,783
Impaired loans carried at fair value of collateral:
One to four units		6,254		3,775
Five or more units		901		1,606
Commercial real estate		2,151		2,542
Church		11,058		5,591
Commercial		—		2,826
Consumer		—		749
Real estate owned:
One to four units		549		1,086
Five or more units		—		260
Commercial real estate		3,829		568
Church		1,007		1,122

The following table provides information regarding our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2011, and the losses recognized on these assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

	Principal Amount at September 30, 2011		Valuation Allowance at September 30, 2011		Losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011
	(In thousands)
Non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale, net (1)	$	6,408	$	910	$	667
Impaired loans carried at fair value of collateral (2)		25,655		5,291		9,523
Real estate owned (3)		6,031		646		2,033
Total	$	38,094	$	6,847	$	12,223

(1) Losses are charged to provision for losses on loans receivable held-for-sale.

(2) Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Includes $8.9 million of loans that were carried at cost as the fair value of the collateral on these loans exceeded the book value as a result of charge-offs.

(3) Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses in the case of a write-down upon the transfer of a loan to REO. Losses subsequent to the transfer of a loan to REO are charged to provision for losses on REO.

The following table provides information regarding our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2010, and the losses recognized on these assets for the year ended December 31, 2010.

	Principal Amount at December 31, 2010		Valuation Allowance at December 31, 2010		Losses for the year ended December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale, net (1)	$	5,918	$	769	$	902
Impaired loans carried at fair value of collateral (2)		21,509		4,420		4,829
Real estate owned (3)		3,090		54		1,102
Total	$	30,517	$	5,243	$	6,833

(1) Losses are charged to provision for losses on loans receivable held-for-sale.

(2) Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Includes $5.4 million of loans that were carried at cost as the fair value of the collateral on these loans exceeded the book value as a result of charge-offs.

(3) Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses in the case of a write-down upon the transfer of a loan to REO. Losses subsequent to the transfer of a loan to REO are charged to provision for losses on REO.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,975	$	20,975	$	21,978	$	21,978
Securities available-for-sale		8,612		8,612		10,524		10,524
Securities held-to-maturity		11,000		11,509		12,737		13,261
Loans receivable held for sale, net		15,212		15,212		29,411		29,411
Loans receivable, net		339,479		339,975		382,616		384,274
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,089		N/A		4,089		N/A
Accrued interest receivable		1,759		1,759		2,216		2,216

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	$	(294,850	)	$	(295,338	)	$	(348,445	)	$	(347,373	)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(87,000	)		(92,976	)		(87,000	)		(91,615	)
Junior subordinated debentures		(6,000	)		(4,905	)		(6,000	)		(4,609	)
Other borrowings		(5,000	)		(5,000	)		(5,000	)		(4,979	)
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		(584	)		(584	)		(272	)		(272	)
Accrued interest payable		(1,080	)		(1,080	)		(550	)		(550	)

The methods and assumptions, not previously presented, used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short term debt, advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance, and variable rate loans, deposits and borrowings that reprice frequently and fully. The methods for determining the fair values for securities were described previously. For fixed rate loans and deposits and for variable rate loans and deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk without consideration of widening credit spreads due to market illiquidity. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair values of off-balance-sheet items are not considered material (or are based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements) and, as such, they are not presented herein.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Stock-Based Compensation

NOTE (9) – Stock-based Compensation

In 2008, we adopted the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2008 LTIP"), which is shareholder approved. The 2008 LTIP replaced the Company's 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("1996 LTIP") and 1996 Stock Option Plan ("Stock Option Plan"), which have expired and are no longer effective except as to outstanding awards. The 2008 LTIP permits the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, full value awards and cash incentive awards to the Company's non-employee directors and certain officers and employees for up to 351,718 shares of common stock. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company's common stock at the date of grant; those option awards have vesting periods ranging from immediate vesting to 5 years and have 10-year contractual terms. The Company has a policy of using shares held as treasury stock to satisfy share option exercises. Currently, the Company has a sufficient number of treasury shares to satisfy expected share option exercises.

There were no options granted during the first nine months of 2011. The Company recorded $39 thousand of stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $62 thousand for the first nine months of 2010.

XML

Income Taxes

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

NOTE (11) – Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management evaluates both positive and negative evidence, including the existence of any cumulative losses in the current year and the prior two years, the amount of taxes paid in available carry-back years, the forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies, which include selling certain assets that we own for a $2.0 million gain, and assessments of current and future economic and business conditions. This analysis is updated quarterly and adjusted as necessary. Based on the analysis, the Company has determined that a valuation allowance of $6.9 million for deferred tax assets was required as of September 30, 2011. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $507 thousand at year-end 2010. The increase in the valuation allowance against its federal and state deferred tax assets was due to the large net losses in the last two quarters and the Company's inability to project sufficient future taxable income.

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)	$ (9,385)	$ 1,678
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	8,488	2,623
Provision for losses on loans receivable held-for-sale	728	1,103
Provision for losses on REO	2,033	780
Depreciation	306	320
Net amortization of deferred loan origination (fees) costs	3	6
Net amortization of premiums on mortgage-backed securities	78	148
Stock-based compensation expense	66	103
Earnings on bank owned life insurance	(66)	(82)
Net losses on sales of REO	56	88
Net losses on sales of loans	88	136
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable	457	(92)
Deferred tax assets	2,466	(131)
Other assets	(1,388)	2,220
Other liabilities	1,377	(320)
Net cash provided by operating activities	5,307	8,580
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net change in loans receivable	24,413	7,234
Proceeds from sales and principal repayments of loans receivable held-for-sale	15,661	3,841
Available-for-sale securities:
Maturities, prepayments and calls	1,898	3,586
Held-to-maturity securities:
Maturities, prepayments and calls	1,733	2,766
Proceeds from sales of REO	3,712	2,455
Investment in affordable housing limited partnership	(417)	(359)
Redemption of FHLB stock		106
Additions to office properties and equipment	(33)	(115)
Net cash provided by investing activities	46,967	19,514
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in deposits	(53,595)	(14,635)
Proceeds from FHLB advances	7,000
Repayments on FHLB advances	(7,000)	(3,600)
Net increase in other borrowings		5,000
Cash dividends paid		(527)
Reissuance of treasury stock	6	6
Net change in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	312	379
Net cash used in financing activities	(53,277)	(13,377)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(1,003)	14,717
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	21,978	7,440
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	20,975	22,157
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	5,661	7,145
Cash paid for income taxes	980
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Transfers of loans receivable to REO	7,691	4,404
Transfers of loans receivable held-for-sale to REO	266	344
Transfers of loans receivable from loans receivable, net to loans receivable held-for-sale	$ 2,544	$ 1,422

XML

Loans Receivable Held-For-Sale, Net

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Loans Receivable Held-For-Sale, Net [Abstract]

Loans Receivable Held-For-Sale, Net

NOTE (5) – Loans Receivable Held-for-Sale, Net

Loans receivable held-for-sale at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Multi-family residential	$	6,463		$	16,217
Commercial real estate		2,064			5,067
Church		7,993			9,408
Valuation allowance for unrealized losses		(1,308	)		(1,281	)
Loans receivable, held for sale, net	$	15,212		$	29,411

Loans receivable held-for-sale, net, consisted of multi-family, commercial real estate and church loans originated for sale and multi-family loans transferred from our loan portfolio. Non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale included in loans receivable held-for-sale, net, totaled $5.5 million, net of charge-offs of $823 thousand and a $910 thousand valuation allowance, as of September 30, 2011 and totaled $5.1 million, net of charge-offs of $414 thousand and a $769 thousand valuation allowance, at December 31, 2010. Restructured loans receivable held-for-sale that have complied with the terms of their restructured agreements for a satisfactory period of time and certain performing loans receivable held-for-sale with delinquency or other weaknesses totaled $3.8 million, net of a $398 thousand valuation allowance, as of September 30, 2011 and totaled $8.0 million, net of a $512 thousand valuation allowance, as of December 31, 2010. A loan receivable held-for-sale secured by a church building, which had a carrying amount of $266 thousand, net of charge-off of $292 thousand, was transferred to REO during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Net lower of cost or market write-downs on non-performing loans receivable held-for-sale totaled $667 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $817 thousand for the same period in 2010. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we increased our valuation allowance by $61 thousand and $286 thousand, respectively, on some of our loans held for sale that are still considered performing loans.