UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
OR
For the fiscal year ended
OR
For the transition period from __________ to __________
OR
Date of event requiring this shell company report __________
Commission File Number:
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its
Charter
and translation of Registrant’s name into English)
(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile Number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered | ||
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
As of December 31, 2024, the registrant had
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |
| Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Emerging Growth Company |
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public
accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
If securities are registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction
of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
| U.S. GAAP ☐ | Other ☐ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive – based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report on Form 20-F contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the safe harbor provisions of the U.S Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, with respect to our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such forward-looking statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and financial results. Statements which use the terms “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate”, “may”, “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to:
| ● | the degree of our success in our plans to leverage our global footprint to grow our sales; | |
| ● | the degree of our success in integrating the companies that we have acquired through the implementation of our M&A growth strategy; | |
| ● | the lengthy development cycles for our solutions, which may frustrate our ability to realize revenues and/or profits from our potential new solutions; | |
| ● | our lengthy and complex sales cycles, which do not always result in the realization of revenues; |
| ● | the degree of our success in retaining our existing customers and competing effectively for greater market share; |
| ● | the global macroeconomic environment, including headwinds caused by lingering inflationary conditions and relatively high interest rates, which could adversely impact the budgets of our customers and potential customers for capital expenditures, and consequently, our revenues, profitability, and cash flows; |
| ● | the degree of our success in retaining our existing customers and competing effectively for greater market share; |
| ● | difficulties in successfully planning and managing changes in the size of our operations; |
| ● | the frequency of long-term, large, complex projects that we perform from time to time that involve complex estimates of project costs and profit margins, which sometimes change mid-stream; |
| ● | the challenges and potential liability that heightened privacy laws and regulations pose to our business; |
| ● | occasional disputes with clients, which may adversely impact our results of operations and our reputation; |
| ● | various intellectual property issues related to our business; |
| ● | potential unanticipated product vulnerabilities or cybersecurity breaches of our or our customers’ systems, particularly in the current hybrid office/work-from-home environment; |
| ● | risks related to industries, such as the insurance, healthcare, defense and the telecom, in which certain of our clients operate; |
ii
| ● | risks posed by our global sales and operations, such as changes in regulatory requirements, geopolitical developments, tariffs and other barriers to cross-border sales, and fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could adversely affect our results of operations; and | |
| ● | risks related to our and our subsidiaries’ principal location in Israel. |
While we believe our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, should one or more of the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, or these risks or uncertainties materialize, our actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Please read the risks discussed in Item 3 – “Key Information” under the caption “Risk Factors” and cautionary statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report in order to review conditions that we believe could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this annual report, to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.
Risk Factors Summary
The following is a summary of the principal risks that could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition, all of which are more fully described below. This summary should be read in conjunction with the other information discussed in this Item 3.D, and should not be relied upon as an exhaustive summary of the material risks facing our business. Please carefully consider all of the information discussed in this Item 3.D. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report for a more thorough description of these and other risks.
Summary of Risks Related to Our Business, Our Industry and Our Financial Condition
| ● | The implementation of our M&A growth strategy involves significant risks, and the failure to integrate acquired companies successfully may adversely affect our future results. |
| ● | If we do not successfully develop and deploy new technologies to address the updated needs of our customers, our business and results of operations could suffer. |
| ● | Our product development and sales cycles are often lengthy, and we may incur significant expenses before we generate revenues, if any, from our solutions. |
| ● | Macroeconomic conditions reflecting lingering inflation, relatively high interest rates and increased tariffs may adversely impact the budgets of our customers and potential customers for capital expenditures, and, therefore, exert downward pressure on our revenues, financial position, and cash flows. | |
| ● | We may be unable to successfully develop and deploy new technologies to address the updated needs of our customers. |
| ● | Retention of key talent is challenging in the current labor markets in the regions in which we operate. |
| ● | Failure to manage our growth— both organic and non-organic—could harm our business. |
iii
| ● | The market for software solutions and related services is highly competitive and dynamic, and we may be unable to adapt rapidly enough to changing market conditions and to compete successfully with existing or new competitors. |
| ● | If we fail to successfully plan and manage changes in the size of our operations in response to changes in demand for our products and services, our business will suffer. |
| ● | If our relationships with our existing customers, including largest customers, are impaired, our revenue could be negatively affected. |
| ● | We are in part dependent on a limited number of core product families. |
| ● | Our business sometimes involves long-term, large, complex implementation projects across the globe, which are accompanied by various risks. |
| ● | Breaches or significant disruptions of our information technology systems have occurred and may occur again in the future. |
| ● | Security vulnerabilities in our software solutions could lead to reduced revenue or to liability claims. | |
| ● | Errors or defects in our software solutions could inevitably arise. | |
| ● | Incorrect or improper use of our products could result in customer dissatisfaction. | |
| ● | We are subject to risks that are characteristic of the insurance market, including catastrophes, potential capital markets crashes, and consolidation. | |
| ● | Intangible assets and goodwill recorded on our consolidated statements of financial position may lead to significant impairment charges in the future. | |
| ● | There may be consolidation in the insurance or other markets in which we operate, which could reduce the use of our products and services. | |
| ● | Our and our investees’ credit facility agreements and debentures are subject to a number of restrictive covenants. | |
| ● | Our use of AI in our business subjects us to accompanying risks. |
Summary of Risks Related to Intellectual Property
| ● | Third parties may assert that we have infringed their intellectual property rights. |
| ● | Our intellectual property rights and our source code may be insufficiently protected. | |
| ● | The loss of third-party technology and intellectual property could limit the functionality of our products. | |
| ● | Some of our services and technologies may use “open source” software, which may restrict how we use or distribute our services or require our release of source code. |
iv
Risks Relating to Our International Operations
| ● | Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have been adversely affecting, and could continue to adversely affect, our business. |
| ● | Our expanding international operations are accompanied by costs, operational risks and required regulatory compliance in many jurisdictions. |
Summary of Risks Related to an Investment in Our Traded Securities and to Our Consolidated Holdings
| ● | There is limited trading volume for our ADSs and ordinary shares, which reduces liquidity and increases volatility. |
| ● | Our securities are traded on more than one market, which may result in price variations. |
| ● | Our largest shareholder, Asseco Poland S.A., can significantly influence the outcome of matters that require shareholder approval. |
Risks Related to Operations in Israel and Other Specific Geographic Locations
| ● | The ongoing war and hostilities between Israel and terrorist groups Hamas in Gaza, and Hezbollah in Lebanon, and, intermittently, the Houthis in Yemen and the Iranian regime— may adversely affect our operations. |
| ● | A reduction of government spending in Israel on IT services, from which some of our revenues are derived, may reduce our revenues and profitability. | |
| ● | Tax benefits available to certain of our Israeli subsidiaries and our Israeli affiliate require us to continue to meet various conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future. | |
| ● | Israeli government grants to Sapiens, one of our subsidiaries, restrict its activities in certain manners and require it to satisfy specified conditions. | |
| ● | As we continue to expand our business in emerging markets, such as India, we face increasing challenges. |
v
CERTAIN TERMS AND CONVENTIONS
Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this annual report to:
| ● | “Formula” refer to Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. alone; |
| ● | “we,” “our,” “ours,” “our company,” “our Group” and “us” refer to Formula, together with its subsidiaries and its affiliate company, unless otherwise indicated. |
Our operations are currently conducted through our subsidiaries—
| ● | “Matrix”, which refers to Matrix IT Ltd. and its subsidiaries; |
| ● | “Sapiens”, which refers to Sapiens International Corporation N.V. and its subsidiaries; |
| ● | “Magic Software”, which refers to Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. and its subsidiaries; |
| ● | “Michpal”, which refers to Michpal Technologies Ltd. (Formerly Michpal Micro Computers (1983) Ltd.) and its subsidiaries; |
| ● | “InSync”, which refers to InSync Staffing Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries; |
| ● | “Ofek Aerial Photography”, which refers to Ofek Aerial Photography Ltd.; |
| ● | “Zap Group”, which refers to Zap Group Ltd. and its subsidiaries; |
| ● | “Shamrad”, which refers to Shamrad Electronics (1977) Ltd. (which we acquired in October 2022); and |
| ● | “Hashahar Telecom”, which refers to Hashahar Telecom and Electricity Ltd. (which we acquired in October 2024); |
and our affiliate company—
| ● | “TSG Systems,” which refers to TSG Advanced IT Systems, Ltd., in which we hold a 42.71% share interest. |
| ● | “Companies Law” refer to the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999. | |
| ● | “dollars” or “$” are to U.S. dollars; |
| ● | “GBP” are to British Pounds; | |
| ● | “NIS” are to New Israeli Shekels; |
| ● | “ADSs” refer to our American Depositary Shares, each of which represents one ordinary share, par value NIS 1 per share, of our company; |
| ● | “ordinary shares” refer to our ordinary share, par value NIS 1 per share, and include ordinary shares that are represented by ADSs; |
| ● | “Nasdaq” refer to the Nasdaq Stock Market, on which the ADSs are listed for trading; |
| ● | “TASE” refer to the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, on which the ordinary shares are listed for trading; |
| ● | “SEC” refer to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; |
| ● | “Israeli CPI” refer to the Israeli consumer price index; |
| ● | “IFRS” refer to International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the IASB; and |
| ● | “IASB” refer to the International Accounting Standards Board. |
Our consolidated financial statements appearing in this annual report are prepared in U.S. dollars and in accordance with IFRS.
Statements made in this annual report concerning the contents of any contract, agreement or other document are summaries of such contracts, agreements or documents and are not complete descriptions of all of their terms. If we have filed any of these documents as an exhibit to this annual report or to any previous filing with the SEC, you may read the document itself for a complete recitation of its terms.
All trademarks appearing in this annual report are the property of their respective holders.
vi
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
| A. | [Reserved] |
| B. | Capitalization and Indebtedness |
Not applicable.
| C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
Not applicable.
| D. | Risk Factors |
Investing in our ordinary shares, including ordinary shares represented by ADSs, involves a high degree of risk and uncertainty. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before investing in our ordinary shares or ADSs. Our business prospects, operating results and financial condition could be seriously harmed due to any of the following risks. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are not aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. The trading prices of our ordinary shares and ADSs could decline as a result of the realization of any of these risks, in which case you may lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business, Our Industry and Our Financial Condition
The implementation of our M&A growth strategy, which requires the integration of our multiple acquired companies and their respective businesses, operations and employees with our own, and their respective businesses, operations and employees with our own, involves significant risks, and the failure to integrate successfully may adversely affect our future results.
Over the past decade and even since the start of the last fiscal year alone, we have made, and continue to make, a significant number of important acquisitions. In April 2025, our subsidiary Sapiens announced that it had entered into definitive agreements to acquire AdvantageGo, a leading provider of commercial insurance software solutions specializing in underwriting workbench capabilities for both the London market and global commercial markets, in a cash transaction, based on an enterprise value of GBP 43.0 million (approximately $55.9 million) that is expected to close during the second quarter of 2025. Sapiens also announced in April 2025 its prospective acquisition (expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2025), for $22.0 million of cash, of Candela Labs, a leading intelligent automation company servicing blue-chip, APAC-based insurance clients. In the first quarter of 2024, Sapiens acquired the remaining outstanding shares of Sapiens Software Solutions (Decision) Ltd. from its minority shareholders. In April 2025, our subsidiary Magic Software completed a transaction to acquire additional ordinary shares of its subsidiary CommIT Technology Solutions Ltd. for approximately $13.8 million, increasing its holdings (on a fully diluted basis) from 68.15% to approximately 79.32%. In April 2024, Magic Software completed the acquisition of all issued and outstanding share capital of Theoris Group Inc. a U.S.-based provider of information technology and engineering consulting services, specializing in strategic data management, analytics, application development, cloud solutions, and the recruitment of technical personnel, for $13.1 million (including deferred payments). In October 2024, Magic Software completed the acquisition of Executive Life Ltd., a U.S.-based executive recruitment firm specializing in talent acquisition services, for $1.5 million (including a deferred payment). In July 2024, Magic Software acquired a nursing care platform operation for $1.6 million. In February 2025, our subsidiary Matrix completed the acquisition of 70% of the outstanding share capital of Gav Systems Ltd. and Gav Expert Ltd., providers of outsourcing services, primarily in the form of computing and software personnel, for total consideration of approximately NIS 45.5 million (approximately $12.5 million). In November 2024, Matrix completed the purchase of 51% of the outstanding share capital of Alacer Matrix LLC (former: Alacer Group), which specializes in advisory services and the provision of experts in the field of governance, regulation and compliance within the U.S. financial market, for approximately $1.95 million in cash, and additional contingent consideration. In December 2024, Matrix acquired Moshe Ort Holdings Ltd. (Ortec) for approximately NIS 19.5 million (approximately $5.4 million) in cash, together with additional contingent consideration. In March 2025, our subsidiary Michpal acquired all remaining outstanding shares of Formally Smart Form System Ltd for total consideration of NIS 28.2 million (approximately $7.7 million). In February 2024, Michpal acquired the remaining outstanding shares of Liram Finance Software Ltd from its minority shareholder for approximately NIS 5.25 million (approximately $1.45 million). In January 2024, Michpal acquired 70% of the outstanding share capital of Heshev Information Systems (2012) Ltd., which develops and markets a cloud-native technology platform for managing financial and business operations, for accountants, tax consultants, payroll managers, bookkeepers, and financial controllers, for total consideration of approximately $1.3 million in cash. In July 2024, Michpal acquired 60% of the outstanding share capital of Meida Computers Software Solutions (G.D) Ltd., the developer and marketer of advanced solutions for recruitment and human resources management processes, for total consideration of approximately $12.49 million and additional contingent consideration. In October 2024, Michpal acquired 60% of the outstanding share capital of Y-IT Ltd., an Israeli based company that develops and markets a technology platform for managing and optimizing transportation operations and vehicle fleets in the Israeli transportation industry, for total consideration of approximately $22.2 million and additional contingent consideration. In December 2024, Michpal acquired 70% of the outstanding share capital of Paperless Ltd., the developer of the cloud-based Paperless platform for digital and online paperless accounting management for finance professionals, accountants, and tax advisors, for total consideration of approximately $2.3 million and additional contingent consideration. Furthermore, our Matrix and Magic Software subsidiaries are currently party to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for a potential merger between the companies (described further below in this annual report).
1
All such past or prospective acquisitions or business combinations are part of our integrated M&A growth strategy, which is centered on three key factors: growing our customer base, expanding our geographic footprint and adding complementary solutions and services to our offerings— all while we seek to ensure our continued high quality of services and product delivery. Any failure to successfully integrate the business, operations and employees of our acquired companies, or to otherwise realize the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions, could harm our results of operations. Our ability to realize these benefits will depend on the timely integration and consolidation of organizations, operations, facilities, procedures, policies and technologies, and the harmonization of differences in the business cultures between these companies and their personnel. Integration of these businesses will be complex and time-consuming, will involve additional expense and could disrupt our business and divert management’s attention from ongoing business concerns. The challenges involved in integrating these acquired entities and other former acquisitions include:
| ● | Preserving customer and other important relationships |
| ● | Integrating complex, core products and services that we acquire with our existing products and services |
| ● | Integrating financial forecasting and controls, procedures and reporting cycles |
| ● | Combining and integrating information technology, or IT, systems |
| ● | Integrating employees and related HR systems and benefits, maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees |
| ● | Potential confusion that we may have in our dealings with customers and prospective customers as to the products we are offering to them and potential overlap among those products |
| ● | Investment of significant management time and attention towards the integration process |
The benefits we expect to realize from our acquisitions or business combinations are, necessarily, based on projections and assumptions about the combined businesses of our Group, and assume, among other things, the successful integration of the acquired entities into our business and operations. Our projections and assumptions concerning our acquisitions may be inaccurate, however, and we may not successfully integrate the acquired companies and our operations in a timely manner, or at all. We may also be exposed to unexpected contingencies or liabilities of the acquired companies. If we do not realize the anticipated benefits of these transactions, our growth strategy and future profitability could be adversely affected.
If we do not successfully develop and deploy new technologies to address the updated needs of our customers, our business and results of operations could suffer.
Our recent success has been based in part on our ability to design software solutions that enable our customers to facilitate, improve and automate traditional processes to make them easier for end-customers, by utilizing advanced technologies, such as digital engagement, low-code/no-code, API layer, advanced analytics and cloud computing. We spend substantial amounts of time and money researching and developing new technologies and enhanced versions of existing features to meet our customers’ and potential customers’ rapidly evolving needs. There is no assurance that our enhancements to our solutions or our new solutions’ features, capabilities, or offerings, will be compelling to our customers or gain market acceptance. If our research and development investments do not accurately anticipate customer demand or if we fail to develop our solutions in a manner that satisfies customer preferences in a timely and cost-effective manner, we may fail to retain our existing customers or increase demand for our solutions.
Introduction of new products and services by competitors or the development of entirely new technologies to replace existing offerings could make our solutions obsolete or adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may experience difficulties with software development, design, or marketing that delay or prevent our development, introduction, or implementation of new solutions, features, or capabilities. We have in the past experienced delays in our internally planned release dates of new features and capabilities, and there can be no assurance that new solutions, features, or capabilities will be released according to schedule. Any delays could result in adverse publicity, loss of revenue or market acceptance, or claims by customers brought against us, any of which could harm our business. Moreover, the design and development of new solutions or new features and capabilities to our existing solutions may require substantial investment, and we have no assurance that such investments will be successful. If customers do not widely adopt our new solutions, experiences, features, and capabilities, we may not be able to realize a return on our investment and our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected.
2
Our new and existing solutions and changes to our existing solutions could fail to attain sufficient market acceptance for many reasons, including:
| ● | Our failure to predict market demand accurately in terms of product functionality and to supply offerings that meet that demand in a timely fashion; |
| ● | Product defects, errors, or failures or our inability to satisfy customer service level requirements; |
| ● | Negative publicity or negative private statements about the security, performance, or effectiveness of our solutions or product enhancements; |
| ● | Delays in releasing to the market our new offerings or enhancements to our existing offerings, including new product modules; |
| ● | Introduction or anticipated introduction of competing solutions or functionalities by our competitors; |
| ● | Inability of our solutions or product enhancements to scale and perform to meet customer demands; |
| ● | Receiving qualified or adverse opinions in connection with security or penetration testing, certifications or audits, such as those related to IT controls and security standards and frameworks or compliance; |
| ● | Poor business conditions for our customers, causing them to delay software purchases; |
| ● | Reluctance of customers to purchase proprietary software solutions; and |
| ● | Reluctance of customers to purchase products incorporating open source software. |
If we are not able to continue to identify challenges faced by our customers and develop, license, or acquire new features and capabilities for our solutions in a timely and cost-effective manner, or if such enhancements do not achieve market acceptance, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may suffer and our anticipated revenue growth may not be achieved.
Because we derive, and expect to continue to derive, a material portion of our revenue from implementation of our solutions, along with post-implementation services such as ongoing support and maintenance and professional services, market acceptance of these solutions, and any enhancements or changes thereto, is important to our success.
Our development cycles are often lengthy, and we may not have the resources available to complete development of new, enhanced or modified solutions. We may incur significant expenses before we generate revenues, if any, from our solutions.
Because certain of our solutions are complex and require rigorous testing, development cycles can be lengthy, taking us up to two years to develop and introduce new, enhanced or modified solutions. Moreover, development projects can be technically challenging and expensive. The nature of these development cycles may cause us to experience delays between the time we incur expenses associated with research and development and the time we generate revenues, if any, from such expenses. We may not have, in the future, sufficient funds or other resources to make the required investments in product development. Furthermore, we may invest substantial resources in the development of solutions that do not achieve market acceptance or commercial success. Even where we succeed in our sales efforts and obtain new orders from customers, the complexity involved in delivering our solutions to such customers makes it more difficult for us to consummate delivery in a timely manner and to recognize revenue and maximize profitability. Failure to deliver our solutions in a timely manner could result in order cancellations, damage our reputation and require us to indemnify our customers. Any of these risks relating to our lengthy and expensive development cycle could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
3
Our sales cycle is variable and often lengthy, depending upon many factors outside our control, which requires us to expend significant time and resources prior to generating associated revenues.
The typical sales cycle for certain of our solutions and services is lengthy and unpredictable, requires pre-purchase evaluation by a significant number of people in our customers’ organizations, and often involves a significant operational decision by our customers. Our sales efforts sometimes involve educating our customers, industry analysts and consultants about the use and benefits of our solutions, including the technical capabilities of those solutions and the efficiencies achievable by organizations deploying our solutions. Customers typically undertake a significant evaluation process, which frequently involves not only our solutions, but also those of our competitors, and can result in a lengthy sales cycle. Our sales cycle for certain new customers is sometimes one to two years and can extend even longer in some cases. We often spend substantial time, effort and money on our sales efforts without any assurance that such efforts will produce any sales.
Macro-economic factors, including lingering inflation, relatively high interest rates, fluctuations in currency exchange rates and increased tariffs may adversely impact our revenues, profitability and cash flows.
Our business depends on various elements, including the economic health of our current and prospective clients, worldwide economic conditions, and with respect to Sapiens, the overall demand within the global insurance technology sector. Sapiens markets and sells its insurance software solutions and services primarily in the European and North American regions, as well as, to a smaller extent, in various parts of the rest of the world. Certain unfavorable economic factors, including inflation, which was high in recent years, have adversely affected the capital budgets of our customers and potential customers (and in particular, the budgets of the customers and potential customers of our subsidiary Sapiens), who have had less money to invest in transformation products, which include replacing their current systems with Sapiens solutions. Higher interest rates, implemented by central banks to curb inflation, have worsened credit/financing conditions for our customers and potential customers and adversely impacted their ability to purchase our products. While inflation has decreased from its peak periods, as have interest rates, to the extent those economic indicators remain relatively high, that could adversely affect our results of operations. These factors have in the recent past, and going forward could also, delay or lengthen sales cycles, and inhibit international expansion of our subsidiaries and/or affiliates, and may also lead to longer collection cycles for payments due from customers and result in an increase in customer bad debt. In addition, fluctuations in the relative value of currencies may again adversely impact our (and in particular, our subsidiary Sapiens’) financial results, as occurred in 2022, when European currencies weakened significantly in comparison to the U.S. dollar. In addition, the weakening of New Israeli Shekel in comparison to the U.S. dollar adversely impacted, in a material manner, the revenues and results of operations of our Israeli based operations, as measured in U.S. dollars in 2023 compared to 2022 and may adversely impact them once again in the future. In 2022 and 2023 Sapiens and Magic Software, respectively, experienced slower growth rates in revenues, profitability and cash flows as a result of those headwinds. Please see “Risks Relating to our International Operations— Our international operations expose us to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that have been adversely affecting, and could continue to adversely affect, our business” for a discussion of the headwinds created by currency exchange rates.
In addition to exerting the foregoing impact, macro-economic factors may amplify a number of risks for us, including, but not limited to, the following:
| ● | our ability to increase sales of new, enhanced solutions to existing customers may be hindered due to more cautious purchasing and investment strategies by corporate customers; |
| ● | reduced economic activity could negatively impact customer discretionary spending on insurance solutions, which in turn could substantially impact our business operations and financial condition in an adverse manner; |
| ● | our customer success efforts and our ability to enter into new markets and to acquire new customers may be impeded, in part due to the lengthening of our sales cycles; |
| ● | there may be an increase in our credit losses reserves as customers face economic hardship and collectability becomes more uncertain, including due to the risk of bankruptcies; |
| ● | our ability to retain, attract and recruit employees may be adversely impacted if our growth rate and profitability decrease; |
| ● | our ability to complete acquisitions may be hampered if we need to seek financing for such acquisitions; and |
| ● | our ability to raise capital may be hurt. |
4
The full impact of economic headwinds on our business and our future performance may also have the effect of heightening any of our other risk factors described in this annual report, and is difficult to predict how long those trends will continue, so there is some level of risk that any guidance we provide to the market may turn out to be incorrect.
In addition, there is current concern regarding the potential impact that increased and reciprocal tariffs imposed by the United States and other countries may have on the economic environment in which our clients operate, which could adversely affect our sales of services and solutions in various countries and regions.
Our business depends on generating and maintaining ongoing, profitable client demand for our services and solutions, including through the adaptation and expansion of our services and solutions in response to ongoing changes in technology and offerings, and a significant reduction in such demand or an inability to respond to the evolving technological environment could materially affect our results of operations.
Our revenue and profitability depend on the demand for our services and solutions with favorable margins, which could be negatively affected by numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control and unrelated to our work product. As described above, volatile, negative, or uncertain global economic and political conditions and lower growth or contraction in the markets we serve have adversely affected and could in the future adversely affect client demand for our services and software solutions. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to develop and implement services and software solutions that anticipate and respond to rapid and continuing changes in technology and offerings to serve the evolving needs of our clients. Examples of areas of significant change include digital-, cloud- and security-related offerings, which are continually evolving, as well as developments in areas such as artificial intelligence, augmented reality, automation, Internet of Things, network engineering, digital engineering and manufacturing, and as-a-service solutions. As we expand our services and solutions into these new areas, we may be exposed to operational, legal, regulatory, ethical, technological and other risks specific to such new areas, which may negatively affect our reputation and demand for our services and solutions.
Technological developments may materially affect the cost and use of technology by our clients and, in the case of cloud and as-a-service solutions, could affect the nature of how we generate revenue. Some of these technological developments have reduced and replaced some of our historical services and solutions and may continue to do so in the future. This has caused, and may in the future cause, clients to delay spending under existing contracts and engagements and to delay entering into new contracts while they evaluate new technologies. Such technological developments and spending delays can negatively impact our results of operations if we are unable to introduce new pricing or commercial models that reflect the value of these technological developments or if the pace and level of spending on new technologies are not sufficient to make up any shortfall.
Developments in the industries we serve, which may be rapid, could also shift demand to new services and solutions. If, as a result of new technologies or changes in the industries we serve, our clients demand new services and solutions, we may be less competitive in these new areas or need to make significant investment to meet that demand. Our growth strategy focuses on responding to these types of developments by driving innovation that will enable us to expand our business into new growth areas. If we do not sufficiently invest in new technology and adapt to industry developments or evolve and expand our business at sufficient speed and scale, or if we do not make the right strategic investments to respond to these developments and successfully drive innovation, our services and solutions, our results of operations, and our ability to develop and maintain a competitive advantage and to execute on our growth strategy could be adversely affected.
We operate in a rapidly evolving environment in which there currently are, and we expect will continue to be, new technology entrants. New services or technologies offered by competitors or new entrants may make our offerings less differentiated or less competitive when compared to other alternatives, which may adversely affect the results of our operations. In addition, companies in the industries we serve sometimes seek to achieve economies of scale and other synergies by combining with or acquiring other companies. If one of our current clients merges or consolidates with a company that relies on another provider for the services and solutions we offer, we may lose work from that client or lose the opportunity to gain additional work if we are not successful in generating new opportunities from the merger or consolidation.
5
Many of our consulting contracts are less than 12 months in duration, and these contracts typically permit a client to terminate the agreement with as little as 30 days’ notice. Longer-term, larger and more complex contracts, generally require a longer notice period for termination and often include an early termination charge to be paid to us, but this charge might not be sufficient to cover our costs or make up for anticipated ongoing revenues and profits lost upon termination of the contract. Many of our contracts allow clients to terminate, delay, reduce or eliminate spending on the services we provide. Additionally, a client could choose not to retain us for additional stages of a project, try to renegotiate the terms of its contract or cancel or delay additional planned work. When contracts are terminated or not renewed, we lose the anticipated revenues, and it may take significant time to replace the level of revenues lost. Consequently, our results of operations in subsequent periods could be materially lower than expected.
Investment in highly skilled research and development, product implementation, customer support and other personnel is a critical factor in our ability to develop and enhance our solutions and support our customers, but that personnel may nevertheless be hard to retain and an increase in that investment may furthermore reduce our profitability.
As a provider of proprietary software solutions that rely upon technological advancements, we rely heavily on our research and development activities to remain competitive. We consequently depend in large part on the ability to attract, train, motivate and retain highly skilled information technology professionals for our research and development team, as well as software programmers and communications engineers, and product implementation experts, particularly individuals with knowledge and experience in the insurance industry. Because our software solutions are highly complex and are generally used by our customers to perform critical business functions, we also depend heavily on other skilled technology professionals to provide ongoing support to our customers. Skilled technology professionals are often in high demand and short supply.
Our research and development, product delivery, and general and administrative, activities are conducted at locations where the competition for skilled technology professionals is particularly intense. While there has been strong competition for qualified human resources in the high-tech industry historically, the industry experienced record growth and activity over the last few years, both at the earlier stages of venture capital and growth equity financings, and at the exit stage of initial public offerings and mergers and acquisitions. This flurry of growth and activity caused a sharp increase in job openings in both high-tech companies and research and development centers, as well as the intensification of competition between employers to attract qualified employees in those jurisdictions. Employee attrition — for all fields and professions, and for all levels of management — accompanied this strong competition, and High-Tech companies such as ours that are based in Israel and these other jurisdictions have recently faced a shortage of skilled human capital, including engineering, research and development, sales and customer support personnel. Many of the companies with which we compete for qualified personnel may have greater resources than we do, and we may not succeed in recruiting additional experienced or professional personnel, retaining personnel or effectively replacing current personnel who may depart with qualified or effective successors.
While the foregoing trend has significantly moderated over the last couple of years, if, going forward we are unable to hire or retain qualified research and development personnel and other technology professionals to develop, implement and modify our solutions, we may be unable to meet the needs of our customers. Even if we succeed at retaining the necessary skilled personnel in our research and development and customer support efforts, our investments in our personnel and product development efforts increase our costs of operations and thereby reduce our profitability, unless accompanied by increased revenues. As a result of the intense competition for qualified human resources, the High-Tech market in which we operate has experienced and may continue to experience significant wage inflation. Accordingly, our efforts to attract, retain and develop personnel may also result in significant additional expenses, which could adversely affect our profitability. Given the highly competitive industry in which we operate, we may not succeed in increasing our revenues in line with our increasing investments in our personnel and research and development efforts.
6
Furthermore, as we seek to expand the marketing and offering of our products and services into new territories, it requires the retention of new, additional skilled personnel with knowledge of the particular market and applicable regulatory regime. Such skilled personnel may not be available at a reasonable cost relative to the additional revenues that we expect to generate in those territories, or may not be available at all. In particular, wage costs in lower-cost markets where we have recently added personnel, such as India, are increasing and we may need to increase the levels of our employee compensation more rapidly than in the past to remain competitive. The transition of projects to new locations may also lead to business disruptions due to differing levels of employee knowledge and organizational and leadership skills. Although we have never experienced an organized labor dispute, strike or work stoppage, any such occurrence, including with unionization efforts, could disrupt our business and operations and harm our financial condition. In addition, we may need to attract and train additional IT professionals at a rapid rate in order to serve several new customers or implement several new large-scale projects in a short period of time. If there is a downturn in economic conditions generally or in areas in which our solutions and services are provided in particular and we need to lay off some of those employees, that will result in our loss of the time and resources that we had invested in training them, and our loss of their accumulated know-how.
Failure to manage our growth— both organic and non-organic—could effectively harm our business.
In recent years, we experienced, and expect to continue to experience in the future, growth in our international operations that has placed, and will continue to place, a significant strain on our operational and financial resources and our personnel. To manage our anticipated future growth effectively, we must continue to maintain and may need to enhance our information technology infrastructure, financial and accounting systems and controls and manage expanded operations and employees in geographically distributed locations. We also must attract, train and retain a significant number of additional qualified sales and marketing personnel, professional services personnel, software engineers, technical personnel and management personnel. Our failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our growth could require significant capital expenditures and may divert financial resources from other projects, such as the development of new services or product enhancements. For example, since it may take as long as six months to hire and train a new member of our professional services staff, we make decisions regarding the size of our professional services staff based upon our expectations with respect to customer demand for our products and services. If these expectations are incorrect, and we increase the size of our professional services organization without experiencing an increase in sales of our products and services, we will experience reductions in our gross and operating margins and net income. If we are unable to effectively manage our growth, our expenses may increase more than expected, our revenues could decline or grow more slowly than expected and we may be unable to implement our business strategy. Our growth may also be accompanied by greater exposure to litigation, including suits by clients, vendors, employees or former employees, as the sizes of our workforce and our overall international operations increase. All such litigation carries with it related costs and could divert our management’s attention from ongoing business concerns. We also intend to continue to expand into additional international markets which, if not technologically or commercially successful, could harm our financial condition and prospects.
The market for software solutions and related services is highly competitive and dynamic, and we need to adapt quickly to trends in order to retain or grow our market share.
The market for software solutions and related services, in which we compete, is highly competitive and continuously evolving.
Our competitors include, with respect to Magic Software and Matrix:
| ● | multinational IT service providers, including the services arms of global technology providers; |
7
| ● | offshore IT service providers in lower-cost locations such as India and Eastern Europe; |
| ● | accounting firms and consultancies that provide consulting and other IT services and solutions; |
| ● | solution or service providers that compete with us in a specific geographic market, industry or service area, including advertising agencies, engineering services providers and technology start-ups and other companies that can scale rapidly to focus on or disrupt certain markets and provide new or alternative products, services or delivery models; and |
| ● | in-house IT departments that use their own resources, rather than engage an outside firm. |
With respect to Sapiens’ insurance software solutions and services and Michpal’s payroll and human resources software solutions and services, our competitors generally consist of:
| ● | global software providers with their own IP; | |
| ● | local/domestic software vendors with their own IP, operating in a designated geographic market and/or within a designated segment of the insurance, payroll and human capital industries; | |
| ● | particularly with respect to Sapiens, BPO providers (as described below in this risk factor) who offer end-to-end outsourcing of insurance carriers’ business, including core software administration (although BPO providers want to buy comprehensive software platforms to serve as part of the BPO proposition from vendors and may seek to purchase our solutions for this purpose); | |
| ● | internal IT departments, who often prefer to develop solutions in-house; and | |
| ● | new insurtech companies with niche solutions. |
Our failure to adapt to changing market conditions and to compete successfully with established or new competitors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Many of our smaller competitors have been acquired by larger competitors, which provides those smaller competitors with greater resources and potentially a larger client base for which they can develop solutions. Our customers or potential customers may prefer suppliers that are larger than us, are better known in the market or that have a greater global reach. In lieu of being acquired by larger competitors, current and potential competitors have established, and may establish in the future, cooperative relationships among themselves, or with third parties to increase their abilities to address the needs of our existing, or prospective, customers. As a result, our competitors may be able to adapt more quickly than us to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, and may be able to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products. As a means of adapting to competition, we and some of our competitors have developed systems to allow customers to outsource their core systems to external providers (known as BPO). We are seeking to partner with BPO providers, but there can be no assurance that such BPO providers will adopt our solutions rather than those of our competitors. Determinations by current and potential customers to use BPO providers that do not use our solutions may result in the loss of such customers and limit our ability to gain new customers.
A number of our competitors also have operational advantages relative to us, as they are generally private companies that are not required to report results of operations on a regular basis, and can consequently benefit from the ability to take more risky actions in the hope of building up strong brand name recognition, such as payment of higher salaries as a recruitment tool, sale of products at cheaper prices, and very rapid growth of sales and marketing teams, even if those actions result in operating losses.
To compete in the rapidly changing environment, and win the competition for end-customers, we also need to offer coherent digital and data propositions, allowing our insurance provider customers to better interact with their own customers in a digital and omni-channel manner. If we fail to adapt and accelerate the development of our digital and data offerings, that may adversely impact our ability to compete in some of our target markets. Consolidation in the insurance industry in which some of our clients operate also increases competitiveness for us by reducing the number of potential clients for whose business we and our competitors compete. The high level of continuity with which insurance and other financial services clients remain with their providers of software-related services also increases general competitiveness by tying clients to their service providers and thereby shrinking the market of potential clients.
8
Our competitiveness in the market is also tied to our ability to adapt quickly to the movement towards cloud-based solutions. Our ability to provide solutions that may be deployed in the cloud has required, and may continue to require, considerable investment in resources, including technical, financial, legal, sales, information technology and operational systems. Market acceptance of cloud offerings is affected by a variety of factors, including but not limited to: security, service availability, reliability, availability of tools to automate cloud migration, scalability, integration with public cloud platforms, customization, availability of qualified third-party service providers to assist customers in transitioning to cloud-based solutions, performance, current license terms, customer preference, customer concerns with entrusting a third party to store and manage their data, public concerns regarding privacy and the enactment of restrictive laws or regulations. We may not meet our financial and strategic objectives if the pace at which we transform our solutions to be cloud-compatible is slower than our customers’ adoption of cloud-based solutions. To address the challenges in transitioning our customers to the cloud, we continue to invest in innovation and feature development, simplified cloud migration, and performance and reliability, as well as other cloud customer success and sales initiatives. There can be no assurance, however, that these initiatives will improve our ability to capture or retain customers that prefer cloud-based solutions. If we are unable to win over those new customers or retain those existing customers, we may experience a negative impact on our overall financial performance.
This movement towards cloud-based solutions is occurring in the insurance and financial services sectors in which our subsidiary Sapiens operates, and also in other sectors in which our other subsidiaries operate. The rising trend of Matrix’s and Magic Software’s customers to switch to cloud-based solutions, is, on the one hand, a business opportunity for us to expand our cloud-based offerings, yet, on the other hand, also carries with it the risk of those customers consuming less of the other services provided by us. For example, in the marketing and software support solutions sector, Matrix and Magic Software have many opportunities for marketing new software solutions products and related services which are cloud-based. Yet, in many cases these will be an alternative to our traditional software solutions products, which are also being promoted by Matrix and Magic Software. As long as the decrease in demand for Matrix’s and Magic Software’s services, due to customers switching to cloud based solutions, is greater than the increase in demand for Matrix’s and Magic Software’s cloud-based solutions, the business results of Matrix and Magic Software may be harmed.
Additionally, the gross profit derived by Matrix and by Magic Software from their cloud-based solutions may be lower than the gross profit that they derive from their traditional solutions, which were replaced by the cloud-based solutions.
We may be required to increase or decrease the scope of our operations in response to changes in the demand for our products and services, and if we fail to successfully plan and manage changes in the size of our operations, our business will suffer.
In the past, we have both grown and contracted our operations, in some cases rapidly, to profitably offer our products and services in a continuously changing market. If we are unable to manage these changes, or to plan and manage any future changes in the size and scope of our operations, our business may be negatively impacted.
Restructurings and cost reduction measures that we have implemented in the past have reduced the size of our subsidiaries’ operations and workforce. Reductions in personnel can result in significant severance, administrative and legal expenses, and may also adversely affect or delay various sales, marketing and product development programs and activities. These cost reduction measures have included, and may in the future include, employee separation costs and consolidating and/or relocating certain of our subsidiaries’ operations to different geographic locations.
9
Acquisitions, organic growth and absorption of significant numbers of customers’ employees in connection with managed services projects have, from time to time, increased our subsidiaries’ headcount. During periods of expansion, our subsidiaries may need to serve several new customers or implement several new large-scale projects in short periods of time. This may require our subsidiaries to attract and train additional IT professionals at a rapid rate, as well as quickly expand their facilities, which may be difficult to successfully implement.
If existing customers are not satisfied with our solutions and services and either do not make subsequent purchases from us or do not continue using such solutions and services, or if our relationships with our largest customers are impaired, our revenue could be negatively affected.
We depend to an extent on repeat product and service revenues from our base of existing customers. For example, five of Sapiens’ largest customers accounted for, in the aggregate, 13.2% and 12.9% of its revenues in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Two of Magic Software’s largest clients accounted together for 13.2% and 16.8% of its revenues in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and five of Magic Software’s largest clients accounted for 23.0% and 22.9% of its revenues in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. If our existing customers are not satisfied with our solutions and services, they may not enter into new project contracts with us or continue using our technologies. A significant decline in our revenue stream from existing customers, including due to termination of agreement(s), would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, in 2023, one of Magic Software’s largest revenue generating clients, without advance notice, and due to reasons unrelated to Magic Software’s services, suspended significant parts of its active time and material-based projects with Magic Software.
We are in part dependent on a limited number of core product families, and a decrease in revenues from these products would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition; our future success will be partially dependent on the acceptance of future releases of our core product offerings, and if we are unsuccessful with these efforts, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected.
We (through our Magic Software and Michpal subsidiaries) derive a portion of our revenues and profits from sales of application and integration platforms and vertical software solutions and from related professional services, software maintenance and technical support. Our future growth depends in substantial part on our ability to effectively develop and sell new products developed by us or acquired from third parties as well as add new features to existing products and new software service offerings. A decrease in revenues from our principal products and related services would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our future success depends in part on the continued acceptance of our application platforms and integration products and our vertical packaged software solutions. The continued acceptance of our platforms and software solutions will be dependent in part on the continued acceptance and growth of the cloud market, mobile and software as a service, or SaaS, for which certain of them are particularly useful and advantageous. We will need to continue to enhance our products to meet evolving requirements and if new versions of such products are not accepted, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Our business sometimes involves long-term, large, complex implementation projects across the globe, which involve uncertainties, mainly during the implementation period, such as changes to the estimated project costs and changes in project schedule. Such changes may cause disputes between us and our customers, whether or not due to failure on our part, and may in some cases result in cancellation of those projects. Such cancellation can adversely impact our revenues, profitability and/or, in some cases, our relationship with the relevant customer.
Our business is, in part, characterized by relatively large, complex implementation projects or engagements that can have a material impact on our total revenue and cost of revenue from quarter to quarter. A material percentage of our expenses, particularly employee compensation, are relatively fixed. Therefore, variations in the timing of the initiation, estimated scope of work, progress or completion of projects or engagements can cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter.
10
This is particularly the case for fixed-price contracts, where our delivery requirements sometimes span more than one year. For a highly complex, fixed-price project that requires customization, we may not be able to accurately estimate our actual costs of completing the project. We are sometimes dependent on the assistance of third parties (such as our customers’ vendors or IT employees, or our system integrator partners) in implementing such projects, which may not be provided in a timely manner. If our actual cost-to-completion of a project significantly exceeds the estimated costs, we could experience a loss on the related contract, which (when multiplied by multiple projects) could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flow.
Similarly, delays in implementation projects (whether fixed price or not) may affect our revenue and cause our operating results to vary. Some of our solutions are delivered over periods of time ranging from several months to a few years. Payment terms for those solutions are generally based on periodic payments or on the achievement of milestones. Any delays in payment or in the achievement of milestones may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
For non-fixed price contracts, we generally provide our customers with up-front estimates regarding the duration, scope, budget and costs associated with the implementation of their project. Due to the complexities described above, we may not meet those upfront estimates and/or the expectations of our customers, for various reasons, which may be attributed to either us or the customers. This could lead to a potential dispute with a client. In 2024 and 2023, certain customers of Sapiens terminated projects with it at the stage of implementation, resulting in the loss of potential future revenues from those customers. We expect that we may have similar cancellations by our customers in the future, during the implementation phase. These terminations, if coupled with disputes with significant customers in the future, whether or not due to failure on our part, could result in lost revenues, lower profit margins, legal claims against us and even the refund of the customers’ money and could harm our reputation, thereby adversely affecting our ability to attract new customers and to sell additional solutions and services to existing customers.
We may encounter difficulties in realizing the potential financial or strategic benefits of recent business acquisitions. We expect to make additional acquisitions in the future that could disrupt our operations and harm our operating results.
A significant part of our business strategy is to pursue acquisitions and other initiatives based on strategy centered on three key factors: growing our customer base, expanding geographic footprint and adding complementary solutions to our portfolio— all while we seek to ensure our continued high quality of services and product delivery. In the past five years we have made numerous acquisitions.
Mergers and acquisitions of companies are inherently risky and subject to many factors outside of our control and no assurance can be given that our future acquisitions will be successful and will not adversely affect our business, operating results, or financial condition. In the future, we may seek to acquire or make strategic investments in complementary businesses, technologies, services or products, or enter into strategic partnerships or alliances with third parties in order to expand our business. Failure to manage and successfully integrate such acquisitions could materially harm our business and operating results. Prior acquisitions have resulted in a wide range of outcomes, from successful introduction of new products, technologies and professional services, to a failure to do so. Even when an acquired company has previously developed and marketed products, there can be no assurance that new product enhancements will be made in a timely manner or that pre-acquisition due diligence will have identified all possible issues that might arise with respect to such products. If we acquire other businesses, we may face difficulties, including:
| ● | Difficulties in integrating the operations, systems, technologies, products, and personnel of the acquired businesses or enterprises; |
11
| ● | Diversion of management’s attention from normal daily operations of the business and the challenges of managing larger and more widespread operations resulting from acquisitions; |
| ● | Integrating financial forecasting and controls, procedures and reporting cycles; |
| ● | Potential difficulties in completing projects associated with in-process research and development; |
| ● | Difficulties in entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience and where competitors in such markets have stronger market positions; |
| ● | Insufficient revenue to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions; and |
| ● | The potential loss of key employees, customers, distributors, vendors and other business partners of the companies we acquire following and continuing after announcement of acquisition plans. |
We may be liable to our clients for damages caused by a violation of their confidential information, including their intellectual property rights and their personally identifiable information, whether due to our system failures, errors or unsatisfactory performance of services, and our insurance policies may not be sufficient to cover these damages. This risk is particularly heightened as certain of our subsidiaries are transitioning towards cloud-based solutions.
We often have access to, and are required to collect and store, sensitive or confidential client information, including personally identifiable information. Certain of our cloud-based solutions and services utilized by our clients furthermore collect and store such sensitive client information. Some of our client agreements do not limit our potential liability for breaches of confidentiality, infringement indemnity and certain other matters. Furthermore, breaches of confidentiality may entitle the aggrieved party to equitable remedies, including injunctive relief. If any person, including any of our employees and subcontractors, penetrates our network security or misappropriates sensitive or confidential client information, including personally identifiable information, we could be subject to significant liability from our clients or from our clients’ customers for breaching contractual confidentiality provisions or privacy laws. Despite measures we take to protect the intellectual property and other confidential information or personally identifiable information of our clients, unauthorized parties, including our employees and subcontractors, may attempt to misappropriate certain intellectual property rights that are proprietary to our clients or otherwise breach our clients’ confidences. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client information, including personally identifiable information, or a violation of intellectual property rights, whether through employee misconduct, breach of our computer systems, systems failure or otherwise, may subject us to liabilities, damage our reputation and cause us to lose clients.
Many of our contracts involve projects that are critical to the operations of our clients’ businesses and provide benefits to our clients that may be difficult to quantify. Any failure in a client’s system or any breach of security could result in a claim for substantial damages against us, regardless of our responsibility for such failure. Furthermore, any errors by our employees in the performance of services for a client, or poor execution of such services, could result in a client terminating our engagement and seeking damages from us.
In addition, while we have taken steps to protect the confidential information that we have access to, including confidential information we may obtain through the use of our cloud-based services, our security measures may be breached. If a cyber-attack or other security incident were to result in unauthorized access to or modification of our customers’ data or our own data or our IT systems or in disruption of the services we provide to our customers, or if our products or services are perceived as having security vulnerabilities, we could suffer significant damage to our business and reputation.
12
Although we attempt to limit our contractual liability for consequential damages in rendering our services, these limitations on liability may not apply in all circumstances, may be unenforceable in some cases, or may be insufficient to protect us from liability for damages. There may be instances when liabilities for damages are greater than the insurance coverage we hold, and we will have to internalize those losses, damages and liabilities not covered by our insurance.
Changes in privacy regulations may impose additional costs and liabilities on us, limit our use of information, and adversely affect our business.
Personal privacy has become a significant issue in the United States, Europe, and many other countries where we operate. Many government agencies and industry regulators continue to impose new restrictions and modify existing requirements about the collection, use, storage, transmission and disclosure of personal information. Changes to laws or regulations affecting privacy and security may impose additional liability and costs on us and may limit our use of such information in providing our services to customers. If we were required to change our business activities, revise or eliminate services or products, or implement burdensome compliance measures, our business and results of operations may be harmed. Additionally, we may be subject to regulatory enforcement actions resulting in fines, penalties, and potential litigation if we fail to comply with applicable privacy laws and regulations.
In particular, our European activities are subject to the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which has created additional compliance requirements for us. GDPR broadens the scope of personal privacy laws to protect the rights of European Union citizens and requires organizations to report data breaches within 72 hours and be bound by more stringent rules for obtaining the consent of individuals on how their data can be used. GDPR became enforceable on May 25, 2018, and non-compliance may expose entities such as our company to significant fines or other regulatory claims. In the United States, our operations in various states, such as New York and California, are now subject to expanded privacy regulations. In California, we are subject to the California Consumer Privacy Act, a statute that went into effect on January 1, 2020 (as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act, or the CCPA, which entered into substantial effect on January 1, 2023). The CCPA imposes enhanced disclosure requirements for us regarding our interactions with customers who are residents of California, such as comprehensive privacy notices for consumers when we, or our agents, collect their personal information. We may be further required to ensure third-party compliance, as under the CCPA we could be liable if third parties that collect, process or retain personal information on our behalf violate the CCPA’s privacy requirements. The sanctions for non-compliance could include fines and/or civil lawsuits. Other U.S. states, including Colorado, Virginia, Utah, Texas, Florida, Montana and Connecticut, have enacted similar - but not identical - laws, which either are or will go into effect in 2023 and beyond. More generally, some observers have noted that these state laws could represent a trend toward more stringent United States federal privacy legislation, which could increase our potential liability and adversely affect our business.
In Israel, where we and most of our subsidiaries have corporate headquarters and significant operations, we are subject to the Israeli Privacy Protection Law, 1981, or PPL, and its regulations, including but not limited the Israeli Privacy Protection Regulations (Data Security) 2017, referred to as the Security Regulations, as well as the guidelines of the Israeli Privacy Protection Authority, or PPA, which impose obligations with respect to the manner certain personal data is processed, maintained, transferred, disclosed, accessed, and secured. As a result, material changes to the PPL or Security Regulations may require us to adjust our data protection and data security practices. In particular, material amendments to the PPL, which we refer to collectively as Amendment 13, were approved by the Israeli Parliament in August 2024 and will come into effect on August 14, 2025. Among other things, Amendment 13 expands the authority of the PPA to investigate incidents where there is concern of privacy violation and to impose monetary sanctions which are considerably higher than those currently available under the PPL and its regulations. In addition, Amendment 13 introduce additional obligations that will apply to parties that process personal data and therefore may require us to modify our data practices, and policies, require to appoint a mandatory position and incur substantial costs and expenses in order to adjust our privacy and data protection practices in Israel. Moreover, on January 2025, the Privacy Protection Regulations (Provisions Regarding Information Transferred to Israel from the European Economic Area), 2023 (“EU Regulations”) entered into effect also with respect to personal data pertaining to Israeli individuals, and as a result may require us to adjust our practices, especially those related to data subjects’ rights.
13
Failure to comply with the PPL, its regulations, and guidelines issued by the PPA may expose us to administrative fines, civil claims (including class actions), and in certain cases criminal liability. The PPA may initiate administrative inspection proceedings, from time to time. In addition, to the extent that any administrative inspection procedure initiated by the PPA would reveal certain irregularities with respect to our compliance with the PPL, in addition to our exposure to administrative fines, civil claims (including class actions) and in certain cases criminal liability, we may also need to take certain remedial actions to rectify such irregularities, which may increase our costs. Upon Amendment 13 entering effect in August 2025, the sanctions for non-compliance with the requirements of the PPL and its regulations (including the Security Regulations and the EU Regulations) will be significantly increased, and, in certain cases, may reach substantial amounts in the millions of NIS.
Any failure or perceived failure (including as a result of deficiencies in our policies, procedures or measures relating to privacy, data protection, marketing or client communications) by us to comply with laws, regulations, policies, legal or contractual obligations, industry standards or regulatory guidance relating to privacy or data security, may result in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, litigation, fines and penalties or adverse publicity and could cause our clients and partners to lose trust in us, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation and business. We expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, regulations and industry standards relating to privacy, data protection, marketing, consumer communications and information security in the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Economic Area and other jurisdictions, and we cannot determine the impact such future laws, regulations and standards may have on our business. While we have invested in, and intend to continue to invest in, reasonably necessary resources to comply with these standards, to the extent that we fail to adequately comply, that failure could have an adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows.
Significant disruptions of our information technology systems or breaches of our data security could adversely affect our business.
A significant invasion, interruption, destruction or breakdown of our information technology, or IT, systems and/or infrastructure by persons with authorized or unauthorized access could negatively impact our business and operations. We could also experience business interruption, information theft and/or reputational damage from cyber-attacks, which may compromise our systems and lead to data leakage internally. Both data that has been input into our main IT platform, which covers records of transactions, financial data and other data reflected in our results of operations, as well as data related to our proprietary rights (such as research and development, and other intellectual property- related data), are subject to material cyber security risks. From time to time, we experience cyber-attacks and other security incidents of varying degrees, though none which individually or in the aggregate has led to costs or consequences which have materially impacted our operations or business. In response to past incidents, we and our subsidiaries have implemented further controls and planned for other preventative actions to further strengthen our systems against future attacks. We also have in place disclosure controls that require the reporting of a cyber attack internally, which help to ensure that our senior management team has relevant information concerning such an attack in a timely manner upon its discovery. However, we cannot assure you that such measures will provide absolute security, that we will be able to react in a timely manner, or that our remediation efforts following past or future attacks will be successful.
Outside parties have furthermore in the past, and may also in the future, attempt to fraudulently induce our subsidiaries’ employees to disclose sensitive, personal or confidential information via illegal electronic spamming, phishing or other tactics. This existing risk is compounded in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, as some of our subsidiaries have implemented in their offices a hybrid model where a large portion of their workforce spends a portion of their time working in their offices and a portion of their time working from home. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to gain physical access to our subsidiaries’ facilities in order to infiltrate their or our information systems or attempt to gain logical access to our subsidiaries’ products, services, or information systems for the purpose of exfiltrating content and data. These actual and potential breaches of our and our subsidiaries’ security measures and the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive, personal or confidential data about us, our subsidiaries, their employees or their customers, including the potential loss or disclosure of such information or data as a result of hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, could expose us, our subsidiaries, their employees or their customers to a risk of loss or misuse of this information. This may result in litigation and liability or fines, our or our subsidiaries’ compliance with costly and time-intensive notice requirements, governmental inquiry or oversight or a loss of customer confidence, any of which could harm our subsidiaries’ business or damage our or their brand and reputation, thereby requiring time and resources to mitigate these impacts.
14
In addition, we and our subsidiaries, including Sapiens, rely on third party vendors and their employees for the implementation of our solutions, which heightens our exposure to potential cyber incidents. In particular, that reliance raises the following cyber risks, among others:
| ● | When third-party vendors handle sensitive information, they can become a target for cybercriminals who aim to steal that data. |
| ● | Third-party software or systems could introduce malware, viruses, or other malicious code into the networks of our subsidiaries, causing significant damage. |
| ● | Cybercriminals can infiltrate the supply chain of a third-party vendor to gain access to their systems and data, potentially compromising our organization as well. |
| ● | Third-party employees with access to the systems or data of any of our subsidiaries can intentionally or unintentionally cause damage or data leaks. |
| ● | Third-party vendors may not comply with data protection regulations or cybersecurity standards, which could result in legal penalties or reputational damage for us and our subsidiaries. |
| ● | If a third-party vendor experiences a cyber incident or data breach, it could interrupt its services, affecting Sapiens as well. |
Our subsidiaries have invested in advanced detection, prevention and proactive systems to reduce these risks. Based on independent audits, we believe that our subsidiaries’ level of protection is in keeping with the industry standards of peer technology companies. Our subsidiaries also maintain a disaster recovery solution, as a means of assuring that a breach or cyber-attack does not necessarily cause the loss of their information. They furthermore review their protections and remedial measures periodically in order to ensure that such measures are adequate. Our subsidiaries devote resources to address security vulnerabilities through enhancing security and reliability features in their systems, code hardening, conducting rigorous penetration tests, deploying updates to address security vulnerabilities, providing resources such as mandatory security training for their workforce and improving their incident response time, but security vulnerabilities cannot be totally eliminated. The cost of these steps could reduce our subsidiaries’ or our operating margins.
Despite these protective systems and remedial measures, techniques used to obtain unauthorized access are constantly changing, are becoming increasingly more sophisticated and often are not recognized until after an exploitation of information has occurred. We and our subsidiaries may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement sufficient preventative measures, and we therefore cannot assure you that our and our subsidiaries’ preventative measures will be successful in preventing compromise and/or disruption of our or their information technology systems and related data. We furthermore cannot be certain that our or our subsidiaries’ remedial measures will fully mitigate the adverse financial consequences of any cyber-attack or incident. If we or our subsidiaries do not make the appropriate level of investment in our or their technology systems or if such systems become out-of-date or obsolete and we or they are not able to deliver the quality of data security that meet our or their independent security control certification requirements, our consolidated business could be adversely affected.
15
We have put an emphasis on the development and use of AI in our business, which is accompanied by certain risks.
We use artificial intelligence, or AI, Generative AI, machine learning, and automated decision-making technologies (collectively referred to as AI Technologies) throughout our businesses, and are making significant investments in this area. We use AI Technologies to enhance our products and services and to add additional capabilities to our products. We expect that increased investment will be required in the future to continuously improve our use of AI Technologies.
As with many technological innovations, there are significant risks involved in developing, maintaining and deploying these technologies and there can be no assurance that the usage of or our investments in such technologies will always enhance our products or services or be beneficial to our business, including our efficiency or profitability.
In particular, if any of the following problems develops with the models underlying our AI Technologies, the performance of our products, services and business, as well as our reputation and potentially the reputations of our customers, could suffer or we could incur liability resulting from the violation of laws or contracts to which we are a party, or civil claims:
| ● | the models are incorrectly designed or implemented, or are trained or reliant on incomplete, inadequate, inaccurate, biased or otherwise poor quality data, or on data to which we do not have sufficient rights or in relation to which we and/or the providers of such data have not implemented sufficient legal compliance measures; |
| ● | the models are used without sufficient oversight and governance to ensure their responsible use, and/or |
| ● | the models are adversely impacted by unforeseen defects, technical challenges, cybersecurity threats or material performance issues. |
We use AI Technologies licensed from third parties in our technologies and our ability to continue to use such technologies at the scale we need may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure. We cannot control the availability or pricing of such third-party AI Technologies, especially in a highly competitive environment, and we may be unable to negotiate favorable economic terms with the applicable providers. If any such third-party AI Technologies become incompatible with our solutions or unavailable for use, or if the providers of such models unfavorably change the terms on which their AI Technologies are offered or terminate their relationship with us, our solutions may become less appealing to our customers and our business will be harmed. In addition, to the extent any third-party AI Technologies are used as a hosted service, any disruption, outage, or loss of information through such hosted services could disrupt our operations or solutions, damage our reputation, cause a loss of confidence in our solutions, or result in legal claims or proceedings, for which we may be unable to recover damages from the affected provider. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
With respect to our products or services that incorporate AI Technologies, the market for such products and services is rapidly evolving and important assumptions about the characteristics of targeted markets, pricing, sales cycles, cost, performance, and perceived value associated with our services or products may be inaccurate. We cannot be sure that the market will continue to grow or that it will grow in ways we anticipate. In addition, market acceptance of products and services that incorporate AI Technology is uncertain. Our failure to successfully develop and commercialize our products or services involving AI Technologies could depress the market price of our stock and impair our ability to: raise capital; expand our business; provide, improve and diversify our product offerings; continue our operations and efficiently manage our operating expenses; and respond effectively to competitive developments.
16
Security vulnerabilities in our software solutions could lead to reduced revenue or to liability claims.
Maintaining the security of the software solutions and related services that we offer is a critical issue for us and our customers. Security researchers, criminal hackers and other third parties regularly develop new techniques to penetrate our customers’ end points, information systems and network security measures. Our increased reliance on cloud-based solutions and services for our customers’ information furthermore heightens the potential exposure of that information. Cyber threats are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated and complex, making it increasingly difficult to detect and successfully defend against them. Unauthorized parties have, in the past, infiltrated Sapiens’ internal IT systems, gaining access to certain proprietary information. If they were to similarly breach the security related to, and misuse, software solutions that we offer, they might access the authentication, payment and personal information of our customers. In addition, cyber-attackers (which may include individuals or groups, as well as sophisticated groups such as nation-state and state-sponsored attackers, which can deploy significant resources to plan and carry out exploits) also develop and deploy viruses, worms, credential stuffing attack tools and other malicious software programs, some of which may be specifically designed to attack the solutions and services that we offer. Software and operating system applications that we develop have contained and may contain defects in design or manufacture, including bugs, vulnerabilities and other problems that could unexpectedly compromise the security of the software or impair a customer’s ability to operate or use our solutions. The costs to prevent, eliminate, mitigate, or alleviate cyber- or other security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs and security vulnerabilities are significant, and our efforts to address these problems, including notifying affected parties, may not be successful or may be delayed and could result in interruptions, delays, cessation of service and loss of existing or potential customers. It is impossible to predict the extent, frequency or impact these problems may have on us.
Actual and potential breaches of our security measures and the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive, personal or confidential data about our customers, including the potential loss or disclosure of such information or data as a result of hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, could expose our customers to a risk of loss or misuse of this information. This may result in litigation and liability or fines, our compliance with costly and time-intensive notice requirements, governmental inquiry or oversight or a loss of customer confidence, any of which could harm our business or damage our brand and reputation, thereby requiring time and resources to mitigate these impacts.
From time to time we have identified, and in the future we may identify other, vulnerabilities in some of our solutions and services. We devote significant resources to address security vulnerabilities through engineering more secure solutions, enhancing security and reliability features in our solutions and services, code hardening, conducting rigorous penetration tests, deploying updates to address security vulnerabilities, regularly reviewing our solutions’ security controls, reviewing and auditing our solutions against independent security control frameworks (such as ISO 27001, SOC 2), providing resources such as security training for our customers’ workforces and improving our incident response time, but security vulnerabilities cannot be totally eliminated. The cost of these steps could reduce our subsidiaries’ or our operating margins, and we may be unable to implement these measures quickly enough to prevent cyber-attackers from gaining unauthorized access to our solutions. Despite our preventative efforts, actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our solutions may harm our subsidiaries’ or our reputation or lead to claims against our subsidiaries (and have in the past led to such claims) or us, and could lead some customers to stop using certain systems or services, to reduce or delay future purchases of solutions or services, or to use competing solutions or services. If we do not make the appropriate level of investment in our solutions or if our solutions become out-of-date or obsolete and we are not able to deliver the quality of data security our customers require, our business could be adversely affected. Customers may also adopt security measures designed to protect their existing computer systems from attack, which could delay their adoption of our new solutions. Moreover, delayed sales, lower margins or lost customers resulting from disruptions caused by cyber-attacks and implementation of preventative measures could adversely affect our financial results, share price and reputation.
17
Errors or defects in our software solutions could inevitably arise and harm our profitability and our reputation with customers, and could even give rise to claims against us.
The quality of our solutions, including new, modified or enhanced versions thereof, is critical to our success. Since our software solutions are complex, they may contain errors that cannot be detected at any point in their testing phase. While we continually test our solutions for errors or defects and work with customers to identify and correct them, errors in our technology may be found in the future. Quality assurance is complicated because it is difficult to simulate the breadth of operating systems, user applications and computing environments that our customers use, and our solutions themselves are increasingly complex. Errors or defects in our technology have resulted in terminated work orders and could result in delayed or lost revenue, diversion of development resources and increased services, termination of work orders, damage to our brand and warranty and insurance costs in the future. In addition, time-consuming implementations may also increase the number of services personnel we must allocate to each customer, thereby increasing our costs and adversely affecting our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, since our customers rely on our solutions to operate, monitor and improve the performance of their business processes, they are sensitive to potential disruptions that may be caused by the use of, or any defects in, our software. As a result, we may be subject to claims for damages related to software errors in the future. Liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or to pay significant damages. Regardless of whether we prevail, the diversion of our subsidiaries’ key employees’ time and attention from our business, the incurrence of substantial expenses and potential damage to our reputation might result. While the terms of our sales contracts typically limit our exposure to potential liability claims and we carry errors and omissions insurance against such claims, there can be no assurance that such insurance will continue to be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that such insurance will provide us with adequate protection against any such claims. A significant liability claim against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position.
Incorrect or improper use of our products or our failure to properly train customers on how to implement or utilize our products could result in customer dissatisfaction and negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects.
Some of our products are more complex than others and are deployed in a wide variety of network environments. The proper use of our solutions requires training of the customer. If our solutions are not used correctly or as intended, inadequate performance may result. Additionally, our customers or third-party partners may incorrectly implement or use our solutions. Our solutions may also be intentionally misused or abused by customers or their employees or third parties who are able to access or use our solutions. Similarly, our solutions are sometimes installed or maintained by customers or third parties with smaller or less qualified IT departments, potentially resulting in sub-optimal installation and, consequently, performance that is less than the level anticipated by the customer. Because our customers rely on our software, services and maintenance support to manage a wide range of operations, the incorrect or improper use of our solutions, our failure to properly train customers on how to efficiently and effectively use our solutions, or our failure to properly provide implementation or maintenance services to our customers, has resulted in terminated work orders and may result in termination of work orders, negative publicity or legal claims against us in the future. Also, as we continue to expand our customer base, any failure by us to properly provide these services will likely result in lost opportunities for follow-on sales of our software and services.
In addition, if there is substantial turnover of customer personnel responsible for implementation and use of our products, or if customer personnel are not well trained in the use of our products, customers may defer the deployment of our products, may deploy them in a more limited manner than originally anticipated or may not deploy them at all. Further, if there is substantial turnover of the customer personnel responsible for implementation and use of our products, our ability to make additional sales may be substantially limited.
Catastrophes may adversely impact the insurance industry, preventing us from expanding or maintaining our existing customer base and increasing our revenues.
Magic Software’s and Matrix’s customers and, more particularly and to a much larger extent, Sapiens’ customers include insurance carriers that have experienced, and will likely experience in the future, catastrophic losses that adversely impact their businesses. Catastrophes can be caused by various events, including, amongst others, hurricanes, tsunamis, floods, windstorms, earthquakes, hail, tornados, explosions, severe weather and fires, or the spread of pandemics of disease, such as the coronavirus. Moreover, acts of terrorism or war could cause disruptions in Sapiens’ or our customers’ businesses or the economy as a whole. The risks associated with natural disasters and catastrophes are inherently unpredictable, and it is difficult to predict the timing of such events or estimate the amount of loss they will generate. In the event a future catastrophe adversely impacts Sapiens’ or our current or potential customers, they or we may be prevented from maintaining and expanding their or our customer base and from increasing their or our revenues because such events may cause customers to postpone purchases of new products and professional service engagements or discontinue projects.
18
The increasing amount of identifiable intangible assets and goodwill recorded on our consolidated statements of financial position may lead to significant impairment charges in the future.
The amount of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheet has increased significantly over the last five years, from approximately $889.5 million as of December 31, 2019 to $1,192.2 million as of December 31, 2024, because of our acquisitions, and may increase further following future acquisitions. We regularly review our long-lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, for impairment. Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are subject to impairment review at least annually. Other long-lived assets are reviewed when there is an indication that impairment may have occurred. Impairment testing, subject to downturns in our operating results and financial condition, may lead to impairment charges in the future. Any significant impairment charges could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Decreases in the capital markets may adversely impact the industries in which we operate, thereby preventing us from expanding or maintaining our existing customer base and increasing our revenues.
Our customers, and, in particular, Sapiens’, Matrix’s and Michpal’s customers, include life insurance carriers and other financial industry participants that have invested some of their funds in the capital markets. Those carriers may experience major losses in those capital market investments that may cause disruptions to their businesses or to the economy as a whole. Any such major disruption may cause those existing or potential new customers to postpone purchases of new products or professional service engagements, or discontinue existing projects, which, in turn, may prevent us from increasing our revenues, or from maintaining or expanding or our customer base.
There may be consolidation in the insurance or other markets in which we operate, which could reduce the use of our products and services and adversely affect our revenues.
Mergers or consolidations among our customers could reduce the number of our customers and potential customers. This could adversely affect our revenues even if these events do not reduce the aggregate number of customers or the activities of the consolidated entities. If our customers merge with or are acquired by other entities that are not our customers, or that use fewer of our products and services, they may discontinue or reduce their use of our products and services. Any of these developments could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.
Our and our investees’ credit facility agreements with banks and other financial institutions, and our investees’ debentures, are subject to a number of restrictive covenants which, if breached, could result in acceleration of our obligation to repay our debt.
In the context of our and our subsidiaries’ and affiliate’s engagements with banks and other financial institutions for receiving various credit facilities and under the terms governing our Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures, Matrix’s Series B Debentures and Sapiens’ non-convertible unsecured Series B Debentures, we have undertaken to comply with a number of conditions and limitations on the manner in which we can operate our business. These include limitations on our ability to undergo a change of control, distribute dividends, incur debt or a floating charge on our assets, or undergo an asset sale or other change that results in a fundamental change in our operations. These credit facilities, agreements and deed of trusts that we and our subsidiaries have entered into with the trustees for the holders of each of our debentures also require us and our subsidiaries to comply with certain financial covenants. Those covenants include maintenance of certain financial ratios related to shareholders’ equity, total rate of debt and liabilities, minimum outstanding balance of total cash and short-term investments, and operating results that are customary for companies of comparable size, and maintenance of a minimum rating level for the debentures. These limitations and covenants may force us to pursue less than optimal business strategies or forego business arrangements which could have been financially advantageous to us and, by extension, to our shareholders. The deeds of trust of each of our debentures furthermore provides for an upwards adjustment in the interest rate payable under the debentures in the event that our debentures’ rating is downgraded below a certain level. A breach of the financial covenants for more than two successive quarters or a substantial downgrade in the rating of any of our debentures (below BBB-) would constitute an event of default that could result in the acceleration of our obligation to repay the debentures, which accelerated repayment may be difficult for us to effect. In addition, Formula’s Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures are secured by certain of the shares of Formula’s publicly held subsidiaries— Matrix and Sapiens. A breach of the restrictive covenants could result in the acceleration of our obligations to repay Formula’s or its subsidiaries’ debt.
19
We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of the proposed merger between Magic Software and Matrix, or such benefits may take longer than expected to be realized.
On March 11, 2025, our subsidiary Magic Software entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding, or the MOU, with our subsidiary Matrix, under which the parties agreed to negotiate a definitive agreement for a merger pursuant to which Matrix will acquire the entire share capital of Magic Software on a fully diluted basis, by way of a reverse triangular merger. Upon completion of the proposed merger, Magic Software will become a private company wholly owned by Matrix. The consideration to be paid to Magic Software's shareholders will be in the form of Matrix’s ordinary shares, based on an exchange ratio derived from the relative valuations of the two companies. If the merger is completed, neither Magic Software’s nor Matrix’s ordinary shares are expected to trade on the Nasdaq market (although Matrix’s ordinary shares will continue to trade on the TASE). See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions— B. Related Party Transactions— Proposed Merger Between Subsidiaries” for more information regarding the proposed merger.
The companies’ ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger will depend, to a large extent, on their ability to integrate the businesses of Matrix and Magic Software. The combination of those two companies would be a complex, costly and time-consuming process. The companies would be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating their business practices and operations, which until now have been entirely independent of one another. The integration process may disrupt the business of either or both of the companies and, if implemented ineffectively, would preclude realization of the full expected benefits. The companies’ failure to meet the challenges involved in successfully integrating their operations or otherwise realizing the anticipated benefits of the merger could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, their activities and could seriously harm the companies’ (and Formula’s) results of operations. In addition, the overall integration of the two companies may result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, loss of customers relationships, and diversion of management’s attention, and may cause the share price of the respective companies (and Formula) to decline. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:
| ● | Managing a significantly larger organization and adapting the companies’ structures accordingly; |
| ● | Maintaining employee morale and retaining key management and other employees; |
| ● | Integrating two business cultures, which may prove to be incompatible; |
| ● | The possibility of faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding the integration process; |
| ● | Retaining existing customers and successfully onboarding new ones; |
| ● | Consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and eliminating duplicative operations; |
| ● | The diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns and, as a result, performance shortfalls at one or both of the companies; |
| ● | Unanticipated issues in integrating information technology, communications and other systems; |
| ● | Managing tax costs or inefficiencies associated with integrating the operations of the combined company; and |
| ● | Managing unanticipated expenses, regulatory hurdles, or timing delays. |
20
Many of these factors will be beyond the control of the companies and any such factor could result in increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could materially impact their and our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, even if the operations of Matrix and Magic Software are integrated successfully, those companies and Formula, as the controlling shareholder of each, may not realize the full benefits of the merger, including the synergies, cost savings or growth opportunities that all parties expect. Those benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame, or at all.
Completion of the merger itself is furthermore subject to the approval of various governmental entities, which may delay that completion, and any requirements or conditions imposed by those governmental entities may diminish the benefits of the merger to the parties and to us. Completion of the merger would also require the approval of special meetings of both companies’ shareholders, and if the applicable majorities (including a special majority of each company’s minority shareholders, as required under Israeli law) do not vote in favor of the merger, it may not become effective. If the merger is not completed for any reason, the parties (including Formula) may be subject to a number of risks, including negative perceptions by Nasdaq and/or TASE (as applicable) regarding the companies, resulting in a decline in the market price of the companies’ shares, and to the required payment of certain costs relating to the merger, including advisory, legal and accounting fees and expenses, without the accompanying expected benefits of the merger.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
Assertions by third parties of infringement or other violation by us of their intellectual property rights could result in significant costs and substantially harm our business and results of operations.
The software industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. In particular, leading companies in the software industry own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, which they may use to assert claims against us. From time to time, third parties, including certain of these leading companies, may assert patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property claims against us, our customers and partners, and those from whom we license technology and intellectual property.
Although we believe that our products and services do not infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third parties, we cannot assure you that third parties will not assert infringement or misappropriation claims against us with respect to current or future products or services, or that any such assertions will not require us to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly litigation, or result in us being unable to use certain intellectual property. We cannot assure you that we are not infringing or otherwise violating any third-party intellectual property rights. Infringement assertions from third parties may involve patent holding companies or other patent owners who have no relevant product revenues, and therefore our own issued and pending patents may provide little or no deterrence to these patent owners in bringing intellectual property rights claims against us.
Any intellectual property infringement or misappropriation claim or assertion against us, our customers or partners, and those from whom we license technology and intellectual property, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, reputation and competitive position regardless of the validity or outcome. If we are forced to defend against any infringement or misappropriation claims, whether they are with or without merit, are settled out of court, or are determined in our favor, we may be required to expend significant time and financial resources on the defense of such claims. Furthermore, an adverse outcome of a dispute may require us to pay damages, potentially including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if we are found to have willfully infringed on a party’s intellectual property; cease making, licensing or using our products or services that are alleged to infringe or misappropriate the intellectual property of others; expend additional development resources to redesign our products or services; enter into potentially unfavorable royalty or license agreements in order to obtain the right to use necessary technologies or works; and to indemnify our partners, customers, and other third parties. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required or desirable, may be unavailable on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and may require significant royalty payments and other expenditures. Any of these events could seriously harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, any lawsuits regarding intellectual property rights, regardless of their success, could be costly to resolve and divert the time and attention of our management and technical personnel.
21
Although we apply measures to protect our intellectual property rights and our source code, there can be no assurance that the measures that we employ to do so will be successful.
In accordance with industry practice, we rely on a combination of contractual provisions and intellectual property law to protect our proprietary technology. We believe that due to the dynamic nature of the computer and software industries, copyright protection is less significant than factors such as the knowledge and experience of our management and personnel, the frequency of product enhancements and the timeliness and quality of our support services. We seek to protect the source code of our products as trade secret information and as unpublished copyright works. We also rely on security and copy protection features in our proprietary software. We distribute our products under software license agreements that grant customers a personal, non-transferable license to use our products and contain terms and conditions prohibiting the unauthorized reproduction or transfer of our products. In addition, while we attempt to protect trade secrets and other proprietary information through non-disclosure agreements with employees, consultants and distributors, not all of our employees have signed invention assignment agreements. Although we intend to protect our rights vigorously, there can be no assurance that these measures will be successful. Our failure to protect our rights, or the improper use of our products by others without licensing them from us could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We and our customers rely on technology and intellectual property of third parties, the loss of which could limit the functionality of our products and disrupt our business.
We use technology and intellectual property licensed from unaffiliated third parties in certain of our products, and we may license additional third-party technology and intellectual property in the future. Any errors or defects in this third-party technology and intellectual property could result in errors that could harm our brand and business. In addition, licensed technology and intellectual property may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. The loss of the right to license and distribute this third-party technology could limit the functionality of our products and might require us to redesign our products. Further, although we believe that there are currently adequate replacements for the third-party technology and intellectual property we presently use and distribute, the loss of our right to use any of this technology and intellectual property could result in delays in producing or delivering affected products until equivalent technology or intellectual property is identified, licensed or otherwise procured, and integrated. Our business would be disrupted if any technology and intellectual property we license from others or functional equivalents of this software were either no longer available to us or no longer offered to us on commercially reasonable terms. In either case, we would be required either to attempt to redesign our products to function with technology and intellectual property available from other parties or to develop these components ourselves, which would result in increased costs and could result in delays in product sales and the release of new product offerings. Alternatively, we might be forced to limit the features available in affected products. Any of these results could harm our business and impact our results of operations.
We could be required to provide the source code of our products to our customers.
Some of our customers have the right to require the source code of our products to be deposited into a source code escrow. Under certain circumstances, our source code could be released to our customers. The conditions triggering the release of our source code vary by customer. The release of our source code would give our customers access to our trade secrets and other proprietary and confidential information which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. A few of our customers have the right to use the source code of some of our products based on the license agreements signed with such clients (mostly with respect to older versions of our solutions), although such use is limited for specific matters and cases, these clients are exposed to some of our trade secrets and other proprietary and confidential information which could harm us.
Some of our services and technologies may use “open source” software, which may restrict how we use or distribute our services or require that we release the source code of certain products subject to those licenses.
Some of our services and technologies may incorporate software licensed under so-called “open source” licenses, including, but not limited to, the GNU General Public License and the GNU Lesser General Public License. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open-source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of the software. Additionally, open-source licenses typically require that source code subject to the license be made available to the public and that any modifications or derivative works to open-source software continue to be licensed under open-source licenses. These open-source licenses typically mandate that proprietary software, when combined in specific ways with open-source software, become subject to the open-source license. If we combine our proprietary software with open-source software, we could be required to release the source code of our proprietary software.
22
We take steps to ensure that our proprietary software is not combined with, and does not incorporate, open-source software in ways that would require our proprietary software to be subject to an open-source license. However, few courts have interpreted open-source licenses, and the manner in which these licenses may be interpreted and enforced is therefore subject to some uncertainty. Additionally, we rely on multiple software programmers to design our proprietary technologies, and although we take steps to prevent our programmers from including open source software in the technologies and software code that they design, write and modify, we do not exercise complete control over the development efforts of our programmers and we cannot be certain that our programmers have not incorporated open source software into our proprietary products and technologies or that they will not do so in the future. In the event that portions of our proprietary technology are determined to be subject to an open source license, we could be required to publicly release the affected portions of our source code, re-engineer all or a portion of our technologies, or otherwise be limited in the licensing of our technologies, each of which could reduce or eliminate the value of our services and technologies and materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and prospects.
Risks Relating to Our International Operations
Our international operations expose us to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that have been adversely affecting, and could continue to adversely affect, our business.
Many of our subsidiaries derive revenues from international operations that are conducted in local currencies. Those operations are conducted in currencies that include the U.S. dollar, British pound sterling, or GBP, Euro, NIS, Danish Krone, or DKK, and Swedish Krona, or SEK.
In some territories, like in Israel, India, and Poland, in some of our operations, our cost of operations in local currency is and may continue to be in the future higher than the revenues derived from such operations. In other territories, such as in the United Kingdom and Europe, in some of our operations, revenues are higher and may continue to be higher in the future than our cost of operations in local currency. Because exchange rates between the NIS, GBP, Euro, Indian Rupee, or INR, and the Polish Zloty, or PLN, against the US dollar fluctuate continuously, exchange rate fluctuations and especially larger periodic devaluations could negatively affect our revenue and profitability. In 2024, the GBP and Euro appreciated relative to the U.S. dollar by 2.75% and 0.06% (based on the average exchange rates over the course of 2024 as compared to 2023), respectively, thereby increasing the U.S. dollar value of the revenues that we generated in those other currencies. A similar movement in currency exchange rates occurred in 2023, when the GBP and Euro appreciated relative to the U.S. dollar by 1% and 3% (based on the average exchange rates over the course of 2023 as compared to 2022), respectively. However, in 2022, those European currencies depreciated relative to the U.S. dollar by 14% and 13%, respectively, which had an adverse impact on our dollar-denominated revenues and results of operations. In 2024, the NIS depreciated relative to the U.S. dollar by 0.25% (based on the average exchange rates over the course of 2024 as compared to 2023), thereby slightly decreasing the U.S. dollar value of our Israeli revenues. A much more significant movement in the NIS-U.S. dollar exchange rate occurred in 2023, however, when the NIS depreciated relative to the U.S. dollar by 9.7% (based on the average exchange rates over the course of 2023 as compared to 2022), thereby decreasing the U.S. dollar value of our revenues and having a negative impact on our revenues and on our results of operations. Any renewal of that NIS-U.S. dollar exchange rate trend from 2023 in future periods would have a similar adverse impact.
23
For additional information relating to the exchange rates between different relevant currencies, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— Overview— Our Functional and Reporting Currency.”
Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks that can adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are continuing to expand our international operations as part of our growth strategy. In fiscal years 2024 and 2023, approximately 37% and 39%, respectively, of our revenues were derived from outside of Israel. Our current international operations and our plans to further expand our international operations subject us to a variety of risks, including:
| ● | Increased exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. |
| ● | Increased exposure to global macroeconomic uncertainty caused by new and reciprocal tariffs being imposed by the United States and other countries, inflation and relatively high interest rates. | |
| ● | Complexity in our tax planning, and increased exposure to changes in tax regulations in various jurisdictions in which we operate, which could adversely affect our operating results and hinder our ability to conduct effective tax planning. |
| ● | Increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with having multiple international operations. |
| ● | Longer payment cycles and difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable. |
| ● | The need to localize our products and licensing programs for international customers. |
| ● | Lack of familiarity with and unexpected changes in foreign regulatory requirements. |
| ● | The burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and legal standards. |
| ● | Compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or FCPA, particularly in emerging market countries. |
| ● | Import and export license requirements, customs, taxes and other trade barriers. |
| ● | Increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities. |
| ● | Weaker protection of intellectual property rights in some countries. |
| ● | Multiple and possibly overlapping tax regimes. |
| ● | Political, social and economic instability abroad, terrorist attacks and general security concerns. |
24
As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will depend, in large part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks associated with our international operations. Any of these risks could harm our international operations and reduce our international sales, adversely affecting our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects.
International operations in the insurance industry, in which a significant portion of our business is concentrated, are accompanied by additional costs related to adaptation to regulations in specific territories.
As we seek to expand the marketing and offering of our products into new territories, because insurance regulations vary by legal jurisdiction, the investment required to adapt our solutions to the legal and language requirements of such territories may prevent or delay us from effectively expanding into such territories. Such adaptation process requires the retention of new, additional skilled personnel with knowledge of the particular market and applicable regulatory regime. Such skilled personnel may not be available at a reasonable cost relative to the additional revenues that we expect to recognize in those territories or may not be available at all. However, since insurance carriers are regularly required to adopt their systems and software to comply with the changing regulations, this provides an additional revenue source for Sapiens by providing related services for compliance.
Our business may be materially affected by changes to fiscal and tax policies. Potentially negative or unexpected tax consequences of these policies, or the uncertainty surrounding their potential effects, could adversely affect our results of operations and share price.
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to income taxes, withholding taxes and indirect taxes in numerous jurisdictions worldwide. Significant judgment and management attention and resources are required in evaluating our tax positions and our worldwide provision for taxes. In the ordinary course of business, there are many activities and transactions for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. In addition, our tax obligations and effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the relevant tax, accounting, and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. This may include recognizing tax losses or lower than anticipated earnings in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated earnings in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, or changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.
We may be audited in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional taxes against us. If we experience unfavorable results from one or more such tax audits, there could be an adverse effect on our tax rate and therefore on our net income. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of any tax audits or litigation could be materially different from our historical tax provisions and accruals, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which a determination is made. Additionally, we are subject to transfer pricing rules and regulations, including those relating to the flow of funds between us and our affiliates, which are designed to ensure that appropriate levels of income are reported in each jurisdiction in which we operate.
Risks Related to an Investment in Our Traded Securities and to Our Consolidated Holdings
There is limited trading volume for our ADSs and ordinary shares, which reduces liquidity for our shareholders, and may furthermore cause the stock price to be volatile, all of which may lead to losses by investors.
There has historically been limited trading volume for our ADSs and ordinary shares, respectively, both on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and the TASE, as well as for our publicly traded investees Matrix (whose shares are traded on the TASE) and Sapiens and Magic Software (whose shares are both traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and the TASE), such that trading has still not reached the level that enables shareholders to freely sell their shares in substantial quantities on an ongoing basis and thereby readily achieve liquidity for their investment. As a further result of the limited volume, our or our publicly traded investees ordinary or common shares have experienced significant market price volatility in the past and may experience significant market price and volume fluctuations in the future, in response to factors such as announcements of developments related to our investees businesses, announcements by competitors of our investees, quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and general conditions in the industry in which we through our investees compete.
25
We have a history of quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations, which make it difficult for investors to make reliable period-to-period comparisons, may also contribute to volatility in the market price of our ordinary shares and American Depositary Shares.
We have experienced, and in the future may continue to experience, significant fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations. Factors that may contribute to fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations include:
| ● | general global economic conditions; |
| ● | acquisitions and dispositions; |
| ● | the size, time and recognition of revenue from significant contracts; |
| ● | timing of product releases or enhancements; |
| ● | timing of contracts; |
| ● | timing of completion of specified milestones and delays in implementation; |
| ● | changes in the proportion of service and license revenues; |
| ● | price and product competition; |
| ● | market acceptance of our new products, applications and services; |
| ● | increases in selling and marketing expenses, as well as other operating expenses; |
| ● | currency exchange rate fluctuations; and |
| ● | consolidation of our customers. |
A substantial portion of our expenses, including most product development and selling and marketing expenses, must be incurred in advance of when revenue is generated. If our projected revenue does not meet our expectations, we are likely to experience an even larger shortfall in our operating profit relative to our expectations. The gross margins of our individual subsidiaries vary both among themselves and over time. As a result, changes in the revenue mix from these subsidiaries may affect our quarterly operating results. In addition, we may derive a significant portion of our net income from the sale of our investments or the sale of our proprietary software technology. These events do not occur on a regular basis and their timing is difficult to predict. As a result, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our historical results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and that you should not rely on them as an indication for future performance. Also, it is possible that our quarterly and annual results of operations may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this happens, the prices of our ordinary shares and ADSs will likely decrease.
The market prices of our ordinary shares and ADSs may be adversely affected if the market prices of our publicly traded investees decrease.
A significant portion of our assets is comprised of equity securities of directly held publicly traded companies. Our publicly traded investees are currently Matrix, Sapiens and Magic Software. The share prices of these publicly traded companies have been extremely volatile over the years and have been subject to fluctuations due to market conditions and other factors which are often unrelated to operating results and which are beyond our control. Fluctuations in the market price and valuations of our holdings in these companies may affect the market’s valuation of the price of our ordinary shares and ADSs and may also thereby impact our results of operations. If the value of our assets decreases significantly as a result of a decrease in the value of our interest in our publicly traded investees, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected and the market price of our ordinary shares and ADSs may also fall as a result.
26
Our securities are traded on more than one market, and this may result in price variations.
Formula’s ordinary shares are traded on the TASE and its ADSs are traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Trading in those ordinary shares and ADSs on those markets takes place in different currencies (dollars on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and NIS on the TASE), and at different times (resulting from different time zones, different weekly trading days and different public holidays in the United States and Israel). The trading prices of our ordinary shares and ADSs on these two markets may differ due to these and other factors (see the risk factor titled “The market price of our ordinary shares and ADSs may be volatile and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you paid, or at all” above for data related to the differences in trading prices on Nasdaq as compared to on the TASE). On the other hand, any decrease in the trading price of our ordinary shares or ADSs, as applicable, on one of these markets could likely affect— and cause a decrease in— the trading price on the other market.
Our largest shareholder, Asseco Poland S.A., can significantly influence the outcome of matters that require shareholder approval.
Asseco Poland S.A., or Asseco, our largest shareholder, owned as of May 1, 2025 approximately 25.82% of our outstanding share capital and therefore has effective voting power over in excess of one-quarter of our outstanding ordinary shares (which excludes shares that we have repurchased that lack voting rights and shares subject to restrictions that are voted in proportion to the votes of our other shares). Therefore, Asseco can significantly influence the outcome of those matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This voting power may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control which may otherwise be favorable to our minority shareholders. In addition, potential conflicts of interest may arise in the event that we or any of our investees enters into any agreements or transactions with affiliates of Asseco. Although Israeli law imposes certain procedures (including the requirement to obtain shareholder approval, which in certain cases includes a “majority of the minority”) for approval of certain related party transactions, we cannot assure you that these procedures will eliminate the possible detrimental effects of these conflicts of interest. If certain transactions are not approved in accordance with required procedures under applicable Israeli law, these transactions may be void or voidable.
If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Sections 302 and 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the reliability of our financial statements may be questioned and our share price may suffer.
We are subject to a range of requirements relating to internal controls over financial reporting. Despite our internal control measures, we may still be subject to financial reporting errors or even fraud, which may not be detected. A control system, which is increasingly based on computerized processes, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. In addition, the benefit of each control must be considered relative to its cost, and the design of a control system must reflect such reasonable resource constraints. Implementation of changes or updates to our control systems, including implementation of our investees enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems at additional sites, may encounter unexpected difficulties. These inherent limitations include the fact that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Further, controls can be circumvented by individual acts, by collusion of two or more persons or by management override of the controls. Over time, a control may be inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with applicable policies or procedures may deteriorate. Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in investigation or sanctions by regulatory authorities, and could adversely affect our operating results, investor confidence in our reported financial information and the market price of our ordinary shares and ADSs.
27
Further to that risk, as part of its assessment of the adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2024, the management of one of our subsidiaries, Magic Software, identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. Magic Software’s management team noted that, as of December 31, 2024, documentation supporting the execution of certain internal controls within Magic Software’s revenue cycle relating to staffing professional services provided by its U.S.-based entities was not comprehensively retained. This primarily pertains to business process controls and procedures intended to support the completeness and accuracy of Information Produced by the Entity (IPE). As a result, Magic Software’s management was limited in its ability to fully evidence the performance of those controls as part of its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (ICFR). Those inadequacies led to the conclusion that Magic Software’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, and that there was a material weakness in Magic Software’s internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2024. In light of that conclusion, Magic Software’s management has expressed its commitment to the continued remediation process of the foregoing material weakness, as well as the continued improvement of Magic Software’s internal control over financial reporting. The subject inadequacies did not rise to a sufficiently material level to cause our consolidated internal controls over financial reporting to be deemed deficient, given Magic Software’s size relative to that of the consolidated Group. Nevertheless, if management of Magic Software or any of our other subsidiaries or investees were to discover additional deficiencies in internal controls that would rise, individually or in the aggregate, above the threshold of materiality for our consolidated Group, that could cause (i) a loss in the reliability of, or (ii) the potential required restatement of, our financial statements, or (iii) investigation or sanctions by regulatory authorities, among other potential adverse consequences, and could cause a decrease in the trading price of our ordinary shares and ADSs.
The enactment of legislation implementing changes in taxation of international business activities, the adoption of other corporate tax reform policies, or changes in tax legislation or policies could impact our future financial position and results of operations.
Corporate tax reform, base-erosion efforts and tax transparency continue to be high priorities in many tax jurisdictions where we have business operations. As a result, policies regarding corporate income and other taxes in numerous jurisdictions are under heightened scrutiny and tax reform legislation is being proposed or enacted in a number of jurisdictions.
In 2015, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or the OECD, released various reports under its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, or BEPS, action plan to reform international tax systems and prevent tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning. These actions aim to standardize and modernize global corporate tax policy, including cross-border taxes, transfer-pricing documentation rules and nexus- based tax incentive practices which in part are focused on challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy. The reports have a very broad scope including, but not limited to, neutralizing the effects of hybrid mismatch arrangements, limiting base erosion involving interest deductions and other financial payments, countering harmful tax practices, preventing the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances and imposing mandatory disclosure rules. It is the responsibility of OECD members to consider how the BEPS recommendations should be reflected in their national legislation. Many countries are beginning to implement legislation and other guidance to align their international tax rules with the OECD’s BEPS recommendations, for example, by signing up to the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent BEPS, or the MLI, which currently has been signed by over 100 jurisdictions, including Israel, which signed the MLI on September 13, 2018. The MLI implements some of the measures that the BEPS initiative proposes to be transposed into existing treaties of participating states. Such measures include the inclusion in tax treaties of one, or both, of a “limitation-on-benefit”, or LOB, rule and a “principle purposes test”, or PPT, rule. The application of the LOB rule or the PPT rule could deny the availability of tax treaty benefits (such as a reduced rate of withholding tax) under tax treaties. There are likely to be significant changes in the tax legislation of various OECD jurisdictions during the period of implementation of BEPS. Such legislative initiatives may materially and adversely affect our plans to expand internationally and may negatively impact our financial condition, tax liability, and results of operations, and could increase our administrative efforts.
28
In addition, the OECD has published proposals covering a number of issues, including country-by-country reporting, permanent establishment rules, transfer pricing rules, tax treaties and taxation of the digital economy. Future tax reform resulting from this development may result in changes to long-standing tax principles, which could adversely affect our effective tax rate or result in higher cash tax liabilities, to the extent those changes are deemed applicable to us.
Risks Related to Operations in Israel and Other Specific Geographic Locations
Political and economic conditions in Israel, including the ongoing war and hostilities between Israel and the Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthi terrorist organizations, and with Iran, which supports them, may hinder our ability to sell our products. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations and business condition, harm our results of operations and adversely affect our share price.
Because a material part of our and our subsidiaries’ operations are conducted in Israel and certain members of our board of directors and management as well as many of our subsidiaries’ employees and consultants’, including employees of our service providers, are located in Israel, our business and operations, as well as those of our subsidiaries, are directly affected by economic, political, geopolitical and military conditions in Israel. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have occurred between Israel and its neighboring countries and terrorist organizations active in the region. These conflicts have involved missile strikes, hostile infiltrations and terrorism against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, which have negatively affected business conditions in Israel.
In October 2023, Israel was attacked by Hamas and other terrorist organizations operating out of the Gaza Strip and declared war in response, which has included a ground operation in the Gaza Strip. As part of the war, Hezbollah, a Lebanese terrorist group initiated missile attacks against Israel, and Israel responded, including with a ground operation in southern Lebanon. The Houthi terrorist group in Yemen and Iran have also attacked Israel with various types of missiles and drones, and Israel has responded with air force attacks. Nearby in the region, the fall of the Assad regime in Syria has led Israel to conduct limited military operations targeting Iranian military assets and infrastructure linked to Hezbollah and other Iran-supported groups.
While our and our subsidiaries’ facilities have not been damaged during the current war, the hostilities have caused and may continue to cause damage to private and public facilities, infrastructure, utilities, and telecommunication networks, which could potentially disrupt our operations and supply chains. In addition, Israeli companies have been subject to extensive cyber attacks, which could lead to increased costs, risks to employee safety, and challenges to business continuity, with potential financial losses. If the hostilities disrupt our and our subsidiaries’ ongoing operations, our collective ability to deliver or provide products and services in a timely manner and to meet our contractual obligations towards customers and vendors could be adversely affected. Parties with whom our subsidiaries have agreements involving performance in Israel could also claim that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions in such agreements due to the security situation in Israel.
Currently, the war has impacted the availability of our workforce in various ways—some of our employees in Israel have been called to active duty (and were released after a period of time), and others are supporting friends or family members engaged in the war. If the situation escalates, they may be called up for additional reserve duty soon, additional employees may be called for service, and such persons may be absent for an extended period of time. This may materially and adversely affect our business operations, including product development, and our ability to meet our customers’ expectations, and could cause our competitive position to be impacted and our sales to decrease. During the year 2024, the number of employees employed in Israel by our subsidiaries who were called up for reserve military service declined from approximately 500 at the beginning of the year to just over 200 by the end of year (out of more than 14,500 individuals employed in Israel by our subsidiaries).
29
The mobilization of employees for military service had a limited adverse effect on our financial performance, primarily due to reduced revenues from Time and Material (T&M) contracts, and the fact that salaries paid to mobilized employees are not fully reimbursed by the State of Israel.
Other than as described above, our and our subsidiaries’ activities in Israel remain largely unaffected, and we and they maintain business continuity plans. As of the date of this annual report, the impact of the war on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition is not material, but such impact may increase, and could become material, as a result of the continuation, escalation or expansion of the war.
Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of the current war or any other event associated with the security situation in the Middle East. Although the Israeli government is currently committed to covering the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained or if maintained, will be sufficient to compensate us fully for damages incurred. Any losses or damages incurred by our Israeli operations could have a material adverse effect on our business. The current (and any future) armed conflicts or political instability in the region could negatively affect business conditions generally and harm our results of operations.
As some of our revenues are derived from the Israeli government sector, a reduction of government spending in Israel on IT services may reduce our revenues and profitability; and any delay in the annual budget approval process may negatively impact our cash flows.
Our Matrix and Magic Software subsidiaries and our TSG Systems affiliate perform work for a wide range of Israeli governmental agencies and related subcontractors. Any reduction or elimination for political or economic reasons of total Israeli government spending (for example, as a result of the current war and military hostilities, political instability, or cuts in Israel’s future state budget), may reduce our revenues and profitability. In addition, the government of Israel has experienced significant delays in the approval of its annual budget in recent years. Such delays in the future could negatively affect our cash flows by delaying the receipt of payments from the government of Israel for services performed.
Certain parts of our activities are based on participation in Israeli government tenders. Delays in the approval of the national budget, reallocations, or budgetary reductions—whether resulting from increased defense spending, political instability, or anticipated future reductions in public expenditure—may adversely impact the allocation of government funds to information technology (IT) and other sectors relevant to our activities. Such developments may result in a reduction in the volume of government tenders, the non-renewal of our engagements under existing government contracts, or our inability to secure awards in significant future tenders. These factors could negatively affect our revenues and may compel us to submit bids with lower profit margins, thereby impairing our overall financial performance.
Our business may be materially affected by changes to fiscal and tax policies. Potentially negative or unexpected tax consequences of these policies, or the uncertainty surrounding their potential effects, could adversely affect our results of operations and share price.
As a multinational Group, we are subject to income taxes, withholding taxes and indirect taxes in numerous jurisdictions worldwide. Significant judgment and management attention and resources are required in evaluating our tax positions and our worldwide provision for taxes. In the ordinary course of business, there are many activities and transactions for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. In addition, our tax obligations and effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the relevant tax, accounting, and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. This may include recognizing tax losses or lower than anticipated earnings in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated earnings in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, or changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.
30
We may be audited in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional taxes against us. If we experience unfavorable results from one or more such tax audits, there could be an adverse effect on our tax rate and therefore on our net income. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of any tax audits or litigation could be materially different from our historical tax provisions and accruals, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which a determination is made. Additionally, we and our subsidiaries are subject to transfer pricing rules and regulations, including those relating to the flow of funds between each of us and our respective affiliates, which are designed to ensure that appropriate levels of income are reported in each jurisdiction in which we operate.
The tax benefits that will be available to certain of our Israeli subsidiaries and our Israeli affiliate will require us to continue to meet various conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which could increase our costs and taxes.
Some of our Israeli subsidiaries derive and expect to continue to derive significant benefits from various programs, including Israeli tax benefits relating to our “Preferred Technological Enterprise”, or PTE, and our “Special Preferred Technological Enterprise,” or SPTE, programs. To be eligible for tax benefits as a PTE or SPTE, these Israeli subsidiaries must continue to meet certain conditions including, with respect to Sapiens and Magic Software, consolidated group revenue at the level of Asseco (its and our controlling shareholder) of at least NIS 10 billion. If they do not meet the conditions stipulated in the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959, or the Investment Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, as amended, for the PTE, any of the associated tax benefits may be cancelled and they would be required to repay the amount of such benefits, in whole or in part, including interest and consumer price index, or CPI, linkage (or other monetary penalties). Further, in the future these tax benefits may be reduced or discontinued. While we believe that certain of our Israeli subsidiaries have met and continue to meet the conditions that entitle then to previously-obtained Israeli tax benefits, there can be no assurance that the Israeli Tax Authority will agree (for example, with respect to Sapiens and Magic Software, in case the overall revenue at the Asseco group level is lower than NIS 10 billion, or if Asseco no longer controls Sapiens).
The Israeli government grants that an Israeli subsidiary of Sapiens has received require it to meet several conditions and restrict its ability to manufacture products and transfer know-how developed using such grants outside of Israel and require it to satisfy specified conditions.
One of our Israeli subsidiaries (an Israeli subsidiary of Sapiens) received grants in the past from the government of Israel through the Israeli National Authority for Technological Innovation, or the Innovation Authority (formerly operating as Office of the Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Economy of the State of Israel, or the OCS), for the financing of a portion of its research and development expenditures in Israel with respect to Sapiens legacy technology. In consideration for receiving grants from the Innovation Authority, that subsidiary is obligated to pay the Innovation Authority royalties from the revenues generated from the sale of products (and related services) developed (in whole or in part) using the Innovation Authority funds, in an amount that is up to 100% to 150% of the aggregate amount of the total grants that it received from the Innovation Authority, plus annual interest for grants received after January 1, 1999. The subsidiary must fully and originally own any intellectual property developed using the Innovation Authority grants and any right derived therefrom unless transfer thereof is approved in accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Encouragement of Research, Development and Technological Innovation Law, 5744-1984, or the Innovation Law (formerly known as the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development Law, 5744-1984, or the Research Law), and related regulations.
When a company develops know-how, technology or products using grants provided by the Innovation Authority, the terms of these grants and the Innovation Law restrict the transfer of such know-how, and the transfer of manufacturing or manufacturing rights of such products, technologies or know-how outside of Israel. Even after the repayment of such grants in full, our subsidiary will remain subject to the restrictions set forth under the Innovation Law, including:
| ● | Transfer of know-how outside of Israel. Any transfer of the know-how that was developed with the funding of the Innovation Authority, outside of Israel, requires prior approval of the Innovation Authority, and the payment of a redemption fee, or, in the case of a license to outside of Israel, a licensing fee. |
31
| ● | Local manufacturing obligation. The terms of the grants under the Innovation Law require that the manufacturing of products resulting from Innovation Authority-funded programs be carried out in Israel, unless a prior written approval of the Innovation Authority is obtained (except for a transfer of up to 10% of the production rights, for which a notification to the Innovation Authority is sufficient). |
| ● | Certain reporting obligations. Sapiens, as any recipient of a grant or a benefit under the Innovation Law, is required to file reports on the progress of activities for which the grant was provided as well as on its revenues from know-how and products funded by the Innovation Authority. In addition, our subsidiary is required to notify the Innovation Authority of certain events detailed in the Innovation Law. |
Therefore, if aspects of our subsidiary’s technologies are deemed to have been developed with Innovation Authority funding, the discretionary approval of an Innovation Authority committee would be required for any transfer to third parties outside of Israel of know-how or manufacturing or manufacturing rights related to those aspects of such technologies. Our subsidiary may not receive those approvals. Furthermore, the Innovation Authority may impose certain conditions on any arrangement under which it permits our subsidiary to transfer technology or development out of Israel.
The transfer of Innovation Authority-supported technology or know-how outside of Israel may involve the payment of significant amounts, depending upon the value of the transferred technology or know-how, the amount of Innovation Authority support, the time of completion of the Innovation Authority-supported research project and other factors. Furthermore, the consideration available to shareholders in a transaction involving the transfer outside of Israel of technology or know-how developed with the Innovation Authority’s funding (such as a merger or similar transaction) may be reduced by any amounts that are required to be paid to the Innovation Authority.
As we continue to expand our business in emerging markets, such as India, we face increasing challenges that could adversely impact our results of operations, reputation and business.
Approximately forty-eight percent (48%) of Sapiens’ employees and approximately five percent (5%) of Magic Software’s employees are currently located in India. Our significant presence in India, in particular Sapiens’ Research & Development personnel and its personnel for the delivery of its professional services, poses a number of challenges. Those challenges are related to more volatile economic conditions, poor protection of intellectual property, inadequate protection against crime (including counterfeiting, corruption and fraud), lack of due process, and inadvertent breaches of local laws or regulations. In addition, local business practices may be inconsistent with international regulatory requirements, such as anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations (including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act) to which we are subject. It is possible that some of Sapiens’ employees, subcontractors, agents or partners may violate such legal and regulatory requirements, which may expose it to criminal or civil enforcement actions, including penalties and suspension or disqualification from U.S. federal procurement contracting. If Sapiens fails to comply with such legal and regulatory requirements, our business and reputation may be harmed.
Conducting business in India involves unique challenges, including potential political instability; threats of terrorism; the transparency, consistency and effectiveness of business regulation; corruption; the protection of intellectual property; and the availability of sufficient qualified local personnel. Any of these or other challenges associated with operating in India may adversely affect our business or operations. Terrorist activity in India and Pakistan has contributed to tensions between those countries and our operations in India may be adversely affected by future political and other events in the region.
32
It may be difficult to serve process and enforce judgments against our directors and officers in the United States or in Israel.
We are organized under the laws of the State of Israel. All of our executive officers and directors are nonresidents of the United States, and a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of these persons are located outside of the United States. Therefore, it may be difficult to:
| ● | effect service of process within the United States on us or any of our executive officers or directors; |
| ● | enforce court judgments obtained in the United States including those predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws, against us or against any of our executive officers or directors, in the United States or Israel; and |
| ● | bring an original action in an Israeli court against us or against any of our executive officers or directors to enforce liabilities based upon the United States federal securities laws. |
Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws reasoning that Israel is not the most appropriate forum in which to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proven as a fact by expert witnesses, which can be a time consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel that addresses the matters described above. As a result of the difficulty associated with enforcing a judgment against us in Israel, an investor may not be able to collect any damages awarded by either a U.S. or foreign court.
Provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of us, which could prevent a change of control and therefore depress the price of our shares.
The Companies Law regulates mergers and requires that tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds be approved via special shareholder approvals. The Companies Law furthermore requires shareholder approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of transactions. Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to some of our shareholders. These provisions of Israeli corporate and tax law may have the effect of delaying, preventing or complicating a merger with, or other acquisition of, us. This could cause our ordinary shares to trade at prices below the price for which third parties might be willing to pay to gain control of us. Third parties who are otherwise willing to pay a premium over prevailing market prices to gain control of us may be unable or unwilling to do so because of these provisions of Israeli law. Asseco’s control of a significant percentage of our outstanding ordinary shares may also discourage potential acquirers from paying a premium to our shareholders pursuant to a change of control transaction. Please see the risk factor above titled “Our largest shareholder, Asseco Poland S.A., can significantly influence the outcome of matters that require shareholder approval.”
Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder are governed by Israeli law and differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under U.S. law.
We are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our memorandum of association, amended and restated articles of association, which we sometimes refer to as our articles, and Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith in exercising the rights thereof and fulfilling the obligations thereof toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing the power thereof in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of shareholders on certain matters. Israeli law provides that these duties are applicable in shareholder votes at the general meeting with respect to, among other things, amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and transactions involving interests of officers, directors or other interested parties which require the shareholders’ approval. In addition, a controlling shareholder of an Israeli company or a shareholder who knows that he or she possesses the power to determine the outcome of a vote at a meeting of our shareholders, or who has, by virtue of the company’s articles of association, the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder in the company, or any other power with respect to the company, has a duty of fairness toward the company. The Companies Law does not establish criteria for determining whether or not a shareholder has acted in good faith.
33
As a foreign private issuer whose ADSs are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, we may follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of certain Nasdaq requirements.
As a foreign private issuer whose ADSs are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of certain requirements of the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market including the proxy rules, which impose certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as domestic U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act; and are not required to comply with Regulation FD, which imposes certain restrictions on the selective disclosure of material information. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our common shares. Accordingly, you receive less information about our company than you would receive about a domestic U.S. company, and are afforded less protection under the U.S. federal securities laws, than you would be afforded in holding securities of a domestic U.S. company.
A foreign private issuer that elects to follow a home country practice instead of such requirements must submit to Nasdaq in advance a written statement from independent counsel in such issuer’s home country certifying that the issuer’s practices are not prohibited by the home country’s laws. In addition, a foreign private issuer must disclose in its annual reports filed with the SEC or on its website, each such requirement that it does not follow and describe the home country practice followed by the issuer in lieu of any such requirement. In keeping with these leniencies, we have elected to follow home country practice with regard to, among other things, composition of our board of directors, director nomination procedure, compensation of officers, quorum at shareholders’ meetings and timing of our annual shareholders’ meetings. We have furthermore elected to follow our home country law, in lieu of those rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market that require that we obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as for the establishment or amendment of certain share-based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company. Accordingly, our shareholders and ADS holders may not be afforded the same protection as provided under Nasdaq’s corporate governance rules.
Our U.S. shareholders may incur adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences if we are classified as a passive foreign investment company or as a “controlled foreign corporation.”
Generally, if for any taxable year 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or at least 50% of the average quarterly value of our assets (which may be measured in part by the market value of our ordinary shares (including shares represented by ADSs), which is subject to change) are held for the production of, or produce, passive income, we would be characterized as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the Code. Based on our gross income and gross assets, and the nature of our business, we believe that we were not classified as a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2024. Because PFIC status is determined annually based on our income, assets and activities for the entire taxable year, it is not possible to determine whether we will be characterized as a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2025, or for any subsequent year, until we finalize our financial statements for that year. Furthermore, because the value of our gross assets is likely to be determined in large part by reference to our market capitalization, a decline in the value of our ordinary shares may result in our becoming a PFIC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year. Our characterization as a PFIC could result in material adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for you if you are a U.S. investor, including having gains realized on the sale of our ordinary shares treated as ordinary income, rather than a capital gain, the loss of the preferential rate applicable to dividends received on our ordinary shares by individuals who are U.S. holders, and having interest charges apply to distributions by us and the proceeds of share sales. Certain elections exist that may alleviate some of the adverse consequences of PFIC status and would result in an alternative treatment (such as mark-to-market treatment) of our ordinary shares. Prospective U.S. investors should consult their own tax advisers regarding the potential application of the PFIC rules to them. Prospective U.S. investors should refer to “Item 10.E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” for discussion of additional U.S. income tax considerations applicable to them based on our treatment as a PFIC.
34
Certain U.S. holders of our ordinary shares (or ADSs) may incur adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences if we or any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are characterized as a “controlled foreign corporation,” or a CFC, under Section 957(a) of the Code. In addition, the CFC constructive ownership rules under Section 958(b) of the Code introduced by the U.S. Tax Act may cause one or more of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to be treated as CFCs and impact our CFC status, and adversely affect holders of our ordinary shares or ADSs that are United States shareholders. Generally, for U.S. shareholders that own 10% or more of the combined vote or combined value of our ordinary shares (including shares represented by ADSs), this may result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and these shareholders may be subject to certain reporting requirements with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. Any such 10% U.S. shareholder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the U.S. tax consequences of acquiring, owning, or disposing our ordinary shares (including ADSs), especially the changes to the rules relating to CFCs.
We may have difficulty protecting our interests as a shareholder of Sapiens, which is a Cayman Islands company.
Sapiens corporate affairs are governed by its Memorandum, its Articles, the Companies Act (as revised) of the Cayman Islands, or the Companies Act, and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of Sapiens’ shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of its directors under the laws of the Cayman Islands are, in some respects, not as clearly established under statutes or judicial precedent as in jurisdictions in the United States. Therefore, we may have more difficulty in protecting our interests than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States, due to the comparatively less developed nature of Cayman Islands law in this area.
The Companies Act permits mergers and consolidations between Cayman Islands companies and between Cayman Islands companies and non-Cayman Islands companies. Dissenting shareholders have the right to be paid the fair value of their shares (which, if not agreed between the parties, will be determined by the Cayman Islands court) if they follow the required procedures, subject to certain exceptions. Court approval is not required for a merger or consolidation which is effected in compliance with these statutory procedures.
In addition, there are statutory provisions that facilitate the reconstruction and amalgamation of companies, provided that the arrangement is approved by a majority in number of each class of shareholders and creditors with whom the arrangement is to be made, and who must in addition represent three-fourths in value of each such class of shareholders or creditors, as the case may be, that are present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting convened for that purpose. The convening of the meeting and subsequently the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. A dissenting shareholder has the right to express to the court the view that the transaction ought not to be approved.
When a takeover offer is made and accepted by holders of 90.0% of the affected shares within four months, the offeror may, within a two-month period, notify the holders of the remaining shares that it requires them to transfer such shares on the terms of the offer. An objection can be made to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands within one month of the notice, but this is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or collusion.
If the arrangement and reconstruction is thus approved, the dissenting shareholder would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights, which would otherwise ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States, providing rights to receive payment in cash for the judicially determined value of the shares. This may make it more difficult for you to assess the value of any consideration you may receive in a merger or consolidation or to require that the offeror give you additional consideration if you believe the consideration offered is insufficient.
35
Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records and accounts or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders. Sapiens’ directors have discretion under the Company’s Memorandum and Articles to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, its corporate records may be inspected by its shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to its shareholders (other than annual accounts, which are available for inspection prior to annual general meetings, and each shareholder’s right to view the share register in respect of shares registered in its name). This may make it more difficult for a shareholder to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.
Subject to limited exceptions, under Cayman Islands law, a minority shareholder may not bring a derivative action against the board of directors.
Copies of Sapiens’ Memorandum and Articles, which serve as exhibits to its 2021 annual report, were annexed as Appendix A to the proxy statement for Sapiens’ 2017 annual general meeting of shareholders, which was appended as Exhibit 99.1 to Sapiens’ Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K furnished to the SEC on October 26, 2017. A table comparing certain Curacao law provisions to Cayman Islands law provisions was annexed as Appendix B to that same proxy statement.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
| A. | History and Development of the Company |
Both our legal name and our commercial name are Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel on April 2, 1985, and are subject to the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999. We maintain our principal executive offices at Terminal Center, 1 Yahadut Canada Street, Or Yehuda, 6037501, Israel and our telephone number is +972-3-5389389. Our agent in the United States is Corporation Service Company and its address is 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, DE 19808. Our Internet address is www.formulasystems.com. The information contained on that site is not a part of this annual report and is not incorporated by reference herein. The SEC maintains an Internet site, http://www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The information on that website is not part of this annual report and is not incorporated by reference herein. Except as described elsewhere in this annual report, we have not had any important events in the development of our business since January 1, 2024.
Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
Since our inception, we have acquired effective controlling interests, and have invested, in companies that are engaged in the IT solutions and services business. We, together with our investees, are known as the Formula Systems Group.
We have adopted a strategy of seeking to create positive economic impact and long-term value for our shareholders and the companies we invest in. We believe that this strategy provides us with capital to support the growth of our interest in our remaining subsidiaries, as well as provide us the opportunity to pursue new acquisitions of, and investments in, other businesses, particularly businesses offering products, technologies and services that are complementary to ours and are suitable for integration into our business, thereby increasing value for our shareholders (and ADS holders). We expect to continue to develop and enhance the products, services and solutions of our investees, and to continue to pursue additional acquisitions of, or investments in, companies that provide IT services and proprietary software solutions.
Our principal investment and divestiture activities since the start of our 2022 fiscal year are described below. For additional information concerning our related financing activities since the start of our 2022 fiscal year, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— B. Liquidity and Capital Resources— Sources of Financing.”
36
Investments by Formula in Existing Subsidiaries:
Changes in our percentage ownership of Sapiens. As of January 1, 2022, our percentage interest in Sapiens was approximately 43.6%. As a result of our acquisition of 285,672 of Sapiens common shares on February 2022, March 2022 and August 2022 for a total consideration of $7.0 million (there were no such purchases in 2023 or 2024) our percentage ownership of Sapiens rose to 44.1% as of December 31, 2022, which thereafter diluted during 2023, 2024 and the start of 2025 as a result of exercises of options by employees of Sapiens. Our interest in Sapiens’ common shares as of December 31, 2024, stands at 43.5%. The source of funds for our purchase of Sapiens common shares in 2022 was our working capital. Our interest in Sapiens’ common shares as of March 31, 2025, stands at 43.5%.
Changes in our percentage ownership of Magic Software. As of January 1, 2022, our percentage interest in Magic Software was 45.6%. Pursuant to our acquisition of Magic Software ordinary shares, we invested an aggregate of $5.8 million in 2022 and $2.1 million in 2023 (there were no such purchases in 2024). Our interest in Magic Software’s ordinary shares as of December 31, 2024, stands at 46.7%. The source of funds for those acquisitions has been our working capital. Our interest in Magic Software’s ordinary shares as of March 31, 2025 remains 46.7%.
Changes in our percentage ownership of Matrix. As of January 1, 2022, our percentage interest in Matrix was 48.9%. During the last three years, solely due to exercises of options by employees of Matrix, our direct interest in Matrix’s outstanding share capital was diluted to 48.7%, 48.2% and 48.2% as of December 31, 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. Our interest in Matrix’s ordinary shares as of March 31, 2025 stands at 48.1%. We have not purchased any Matrix shares in any of the years 2022, 2023 or 2024.
on March 10, 2025, Matrix and Magic entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the purpose of negotiating a definitive agreement regarding a merger, under which Matrix will acquire the entire share capital of Magic on a fully diluted basis, by way of a reverse triangular merger, upon completion of which Magic will become a private wholly-owned (100%) subsidiary of Matrix (the “Merger”). Ordinary shares of Matrix will continue to be traded exclusively on the TASE. Magic’s ordinary shares are expected to be delisted from trading on the TASE and NASDAQ. The MOU is intended to set out the main agreements reached between Matrix and Magic, their respective audit committees and board of directors, including their agreement on the Merger consideration. The MOU is not legally binding, except for the provisions of Disclosure, Governing Law and Jurisdiction and Binding Effect
Changes in our percentage ownership of TSG Systems. As of January 1, 2022, our percentage interest in TSG Systems was 50.0%. During the last three years, solely due to TSG Systems’ initial public offering held on August 1, 2024 and the exercises of options by employees of TSG Systems, our direct interest in TSG Systems’ outstanding share capital was diluted to 42.71 as of December 31, 2024. Our interest in TSG Systems’ ordinary shares as of March 31, 2025, stands at 42.34%. We have not purchased any TSG Systems’ shares in any of the years 2022, 2023 or 2024.
Acquisitions by Formula:
Acquisition of Hashahar Telecom and Electricity Ltd., (“Hashahar”) On October 1, 2024 we acquired 51% of the outstanding share capital of Hashahar, an Israeli privately held company established in 2018, specializing in the planning, deployment, and installation of fiber optics, structured cabling (CAT 6/7), coaxial and telephony systems for both enterprise and residential sectors, including intercity infrastructure and public sector projects. Total consideration paid amounted to $1.3 million. Hashahar delivers end-to-end project execution through in-house engineering, dedicated project managers, and stringent safety and data security protocols. Its clients include Bezeq, HOT, Cellcom, YES, Israel Railways, and multiple government bodies. With VPN-enabled IT infrastructure, automated triple-backup systems, and Priority ERP for operational oversight, the company maintains a high standard of execution in complex fiber deployment and communication infrastructure projects. For further information, please see Note 3(v) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
37
Investments in a private company accounted for at equity. In September 2024, we completed the acquisition of a 21.45% equity interest in an Israel-based private technology company specializing in artificial intelligence-powered product comparison and e-commerce guidance platforms. The investee operates a global portfolio of consumer-oriented websites that provide comprehensive product reviews, side-by-side comparisons, and price tracking functionalities, collectively serving over 40 million monthly users across more than 20 countries. Total consideration for the investment amounted to $15.3 million. For further information, please see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Shamrad Electronic (1997) Ltd. On October 2, 2022, we acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Shamrad, an Israeli private company, engaged in the supply, integration and installation of computer communication infrastructures, announcement and alarm systems and electronic security systems. Shamrad represents several companies in the field of security: ATI systems – sirens, Garrett – Metal detectors, Kopp – Ferro Magnetic detectors for MRI rooms. The total consideration for the acquisition amounted to approximately NIS 9.4 million (approximately $2.7 million), with NIS 7.1 million (approximately $2.0 million) paid in cash upon closing, or approximately NIS 8.6 million (approximately $2.4 million) net of acquired cash. Acquisition-related costs were immaterial.
Acquisitions by Sapiens:
Acquisition of AdvantageGo. On April 28, 2025, Sapiens announced that it had entered into definitive agreements to acquire AdvantageGo, a leading provider of commercial insurance software solutions specializing in underwriting workbench capabilities for both the London market and global commercial markets. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of 2025, at which point AdvantageGo will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Sapiens. The acquisition is structured as a cash transaction, based on an enterprise value of GBP 43.0 million (approximately $55.9 million). For further information, please see Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Investment in Sapiens Software Solutions (Decision). In the first quarter of 2024, Sapiens acquired the remaining outstanding shares of Sapiens Software Solutions (Decision) Ltd. from its minority shareholders, (which, along with certain other Sapiens’ subsidiaries, was merged into Sapiens Technologic 1982 Ltd.).
Acquisition of Candela Labs
On April 22, 2025 Sapiens announced the acquisition of Candela Labs, a leading intelligent automation company servicing blue-chip, APAC-based insurance clients. This strategic move aims to enhance Sapiens’ life product portfolio and expand its presence in the APAC region. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and expected to close during the second quarter of 2025. Candela offers an end-to-end insurance automation platform along with digital services and solutions. Candela has 23 customers, primarily in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Hong Kong and South Africa. The Candela team of over 100 employees is mainly in Bangalore, India. Candela is currently part of Azentio, a Singapore-based company. The acquisition of Candela is structured as a cash transaction. Candela non-GAAP full year 2024 revenues were approximately $8.0 million. Sapiens will pay an aggregate cash consideration of $22.0 million. The transaction is expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2025. Upon completion, Candela will become wholly owned by Sapiens. For further information, please see Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of NCDC S.A. In the fourth quarter of 2023, Sapiens acquired NCDC S.A., a Poland-based company with a knowledge of Sapiens’ products in the Nordics, for a purchase price of $11.7 million. For further information, please see Note 3(i) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
38
Investments in Sapiens Software Solutions (Decision), Tiful Gemel Ltd and Neuralmatic
On December 31, 2023, Sapiens signed an agreement for the purchase of the remaining outstanding shares of Sapiens Software Solutions (Decision) Ltd. from its minority shareholders for total consideration of approximately $4.1 million. The purchase closed on March 27, 2024.
In December 2023, Sapiens acquired the remaining 5% of the outstanding share capital of Tiful Gemel Ltd., an Israeli company which provides software solutions and managed services related to pension and provident funds in the Israeli market, thereby transforming it into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sapiens. Total consideration amounted to $161 thousand.
In February 2023, Sapiens acquired the remaining 34% of the outstanding share capital of Neuralmatic Ltd, transforming it into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sapiens. The purchase price was immaterial.
Acquisition of I.T. Cognitive Ltd. In May 2022 Sapiens acquired the entire share capital of I.T. Cognitive Ltd. (today: Sapiens Cognitive Ltd.) for a purchase price of $3.5 million. Prior to that Sapiens had purchased from I.T Cognitive a source code license enabling it to accelerate its digital offering.
Acquisitions and Divestitures by Matrix:
Acquisition of Gav Systems Ltd. (“Gav Systems”) and Gav Expert Ltd. (“Gav Expert”). On February 4, 2025, Matrix completed the acquisition of 70% of the outstanding share capital of Gav Systems and Gav Expert for a total consideration of approximately NIS 45.5 million (approximately $12.5 million). Pursuant to the agreement, Matrix and the seller hold mutual options for the sale and purchase of the seller’s remaining shares in Gav Systems and Gav Expert. Gav Systems and Gav Expert provide outsourcing services, primarily in the form of computing and software personnel. For further information, please see Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Alacer Group. On November 13, 2024, Matrix, through its subsidiary Matrix U.S Holding LLC, completed the purchase of 51% of the outstanding share capital of Alacer Matrix LLC (former: Alacer Group), which specializes in advisory services and the provision of experts in the field of governance, regulation & compliance within the U.S. financial market, for approximately $1.95 million in cash, and additional contingent consideration based on Alacer's performance over the next three years. In addition, Matrix holds a call option to acquire the remaining share capital of Alacer. For further information, please see Note 3(iii) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Moshe Ort Holdings Ltd. (“Ortec”). On December 3, 2024, Matrix through its wholly owned subsidiary, Matrix IT Integration and Infrastructure, completed the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding share capital of Ortec for a total cash consideration of approximately NIS 19.5 million (approximately $5.4 million), in addition to a contingent consideration subject to Ortec's future financial performance. Established in 1987 and headquartered in Raanana, Israel, Ortec specializes in representing international manufacturers of production, assembly, and testing equipment for the electronics, microelectronics, and photonics industries. The company supplies advanced systems for surface-mount device (SMD) and through-hole (TH) component assembly, automated optical inspection (AOI), solder paste inspection (SPI), X-ray component counting, and custom assembly and testing solutions for optical fiber communication components, lasers, and optoelectronic devices. Ortec also provides comprehensive technical support, including installation, maintenance, and process optimization services, in collaboration with its global equipment partners. For further information, please see Note 3(iii) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Zebra AGR Technologies Ltd. On January 1, 2023, Matrix acquired 70% of the share capital of Zebra AGR Technologies Ltd. (“Zebra”), which specializes in the marketing and distribution of software solutions in the fields of information security, cyber protection and data communication. Zebra provides distribution services, including consulting, logistics, financing, marketing, and professional services, with an authorized support and training center. Matrix paid NIS 53 million (approximately $15.1 million) for this acquisition. Matrix and the minority shareholders of Zebra hold mutual call and put options for the remaining 30% interest in Zebra. For further information, please see Note 3(iii) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
39
Acquisition of RDT Equipment and Systems (1993) Ltd. On June 19, 2022, Matrix, through Matrix Integration and Infrastructure Ltd., Matrix’s wholly owned subsidiary, acquired all of the share capital of RDT for cash consideration of NIS 44 million (approximately $12.7 million), or NIS 41 million (approximately $11.9 million) net of acquired cash. As part of the purchase agreement, the sellers may be entitled to additional future consideration contingent upon RDT meeting certain future operating profit targets. As of the acquisition date, Matrix estimates the future value of the contingent consideration at NIS 9.9 million (approximately $2.9 million). RDT provides services in the field of multimedia systems. RDT markets software solutions and systems for a wide range of technologies, including control and automation solutions, test and measurement equipment, advanced technological solutions for testing data communication, EMC products, radio frequency (RF) and microwaves components, and serves, among other things, as a representative in Israel for dozens of international software and hardware vendors.
Divestiture of Infinity Labs R&D Ltd. On April 24, 2022, Matrix concluded the sale of 45.2% of the issued and share capital of Infinity Labs R. & D. Ltd. (“Infinity”) for a total consideration of NIS 154.5 million (approximately $46.2 million). Following the transaction, Matrix’s remaining interest in Infinity’s outstanding share capital amounts to 4.9% of Infinity’s outstanding share capital. As a result of the transaction, we recognized a capital gain (before tax), in the amount of approximately NIS 148.1 million (approximately $44.3 million), including NIS 16.7 million (approximately $5.0 million) recorded with respect to the revaluation of the Matrix remaining share interest in Infinity. In accordance, as of the second quarter of 2022, Infinity’s financial results of operations were not consolidated in our financial statements and the remaining share interest of 4.9% in Infinity’s outstanding share capital was measured at fair value with subsequent changes in the fair value of the investment recognized in profit or loss. Matrix distributed the capital gain (net of tax) to its shareholders as a dividend.
Acquisitions by Magic Software:
Acquisition of Theoris Group Inc. ("Theoris"). On April 4, 2024, Magic Software, through its wholly owned subsidiary, CoreTech Consulting Group LLC, completed the acquisition of all issued and outstanding share capital of Theoris. Theoris is a U.S.-based provider of information technology and engineering consulting services, specializing in strategic data management, analytics, application development, cloud solutions, and the recruitment of technical personnel. Total consideration amounted to $13.1 million, comprised of a base purchase price of $10.0 million, a deferred working capital adjustment payment of $0.84 million (of which $0.54 million was paid on the acquisition date), and additional deferred payments totaling $2.3 million. For further information, please see Note 3(ii) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Executive Life Ltd. ("Executive"). On October 31, 2024, Magic Software through its wholly owned subsidiary, CoreTech Consulting Group LLC, completed the acquisition of all issued and outstanding share capital of Executive, a U.S.-based executive recruitment firm headquartered in Long Island, New York. Executive specializes in talent acquisition services across multiple sectors, including construction, information technology, marketing, accounting, finance, and manufacturing engineering, with a primary geographic focus on New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Texas, and California. Total consideration amounted to $1.5 million, comprising a base purchase price of $0.8 million and a deferred payment of $0.7 million, payable up to one year from the acquisition date. For further information, please see Note 3(ii) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of K.M.T. (M.H.) Technologies Communication Computer Ltd. On June 8, 2023, Magic Software acquired 60% of the share interest in K.M.T. (M.H.) Technologies Communication Computer Ltd. (“KMT”). KMT delivers a broad spectrum of ICT products, a cloud platform, VoIP, technical support and planning and construction of computing. Total purchase price amounted to NIS 55.0 million (approximately $ 14.9 million) or approximately NIS 52.7 million approximately $14.2 million) net of acquired cash. NIS 60 million was paid upon closing of which a payment of NIS 15 million is related to a contingent consideration depending on the future operating results achieved by KMT. If such future operating results will not be fully achieved, the seller will return the whole or part of the contingent consideration paid in advance. For further information, please see Note 3(ii) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
40
Acquisition of Appush Ltd (formerly known as Vidstart Ltd.). On December 2, 2021 (the “Appush Acquisition Date”), Magic Software entered into a share purchase agreement to acquire 50.1% of Appush Ltd. (formerly known as Vidstart Ltd.) (“Appush”), a provider of a video advertising platform that offers personalized automated methods and real-time smart optimization, helping its clients achieve high yields in the competitive digital ecosystem. According to the share purchase agreement, Magic software is committed to purchase the remainder of Appush’s shares in two tranches: 30% on April 1, 2022 and 19.9% on April 1, 2023. As of the closing date the estimated total consideration for the acquisition of all of the outstanding share capital of Appush amounted to $21.5 million, or approximately $19.9 million, net of acquired cash (of which $11.0 million was paid in cash at closing, or approximately $9.5 million net of acquired cash).
Acquisition of The Goodkind Group, LLC. On August 23, 2022, Magic Software acquired 100% of TGG outstanding share capital for a total consideration of $11.6 million or approximately $11.5 million net of acquired cash (of which approximately $8 million was paid upon closing, or approximately $7.9 million net of acquired cash). TGG provides permanent and temporary staffing services in various sectors, including: Information Technology, Accounting & Finance, Digital Media, Marketing, Human Resource, Financial Services. With On-Site programs and sourcing models, TGG solutions include functions which differ from standard staffing companies. TGG provides assistance in the areas of compensation design and development, employee opinion surveys, employment policies and practices, performance management, regulatory and compliance issues and succession planning. The remainder constitutes a deferred payment payable in 2023 (approximately $2.8 million) and 2024 (approximately $0.9 million). During 2023 Magic Software paid $1.9 million with respect to the 2023 deferred payment and in 2024 Magic Software paid an additional $1.5 million as final consideration for the deferred payment.
Acquisition of Intrabases SAS. On July 1, 2022, Magic Software acquired Intrabases SAS, a provider of IT professional services based in Nantes, France. The consideration of the transaction is comprised solely of cash consideration in an amount of approximately $3.4 million, or approximately $3.0 million net of acquired cash.
During 2022 Magic Software concluded additional two separate asset purchase agreements. The total consideration paid for these acquisitions amounted to approximately $1.8 million.
Acquisitions by Michpal Technologies:
Acquisition of Formally Smart Form System Ltd. On March 31, 2025, following the exercise of a put option, our subsidiary Michpal acquired all remaining outstanding shares of Formally Smart Form System Ltd for a total consideration of NIS 28.2 million (approximately $7.7 million). For further information, please see Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Liram Finance Software Ltd. On February 19, 2024, following the exercise of a put option, Michpal acquired the remaining outstanding shares of Liram Finance Software Ltd from its minority shareholder. The total purchase consideration amounted to approximately NIS 5.25 million (approximately $1.45 million), of which NIS 1.0 million (approximately $0.3 million) was paid in advance to the seller in 2023. For further information, please see Note 3(iv) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Heshev Information Systems (2012) Ltd. On January 1, 2024, Michpal acquired 70% of Heshev Information Systems (2012) Ltd., (“Heshev”) outstanding share capital for a total consideration of approximately $1.3 million paid in cash. Heshev develops and markets a cloud-native technology platform for managing financial and business operations for accountants, tax consultants, payroll managers, bookkeepers, and financial controllers. The platform includes, among other features, fixed asset management, preparation and submission of financial reports, as well as advanced tools for performing financial simulations and payroll calculations. Additionally, Heshev provides an online platform that enables its clients to manage their financial and business activities entirely digitally, utilizing advanced cloud technologies and providing access to up-to-date professional information. Michpal and the seller hold mutual call and put options, respectively, for the remaining 30% share interest held by the seller in Heshev. These options can be exercised during a consecutive three-year period commencing five years from the acquisition date, at an exercise price determined by a mechanism specified in the agreement. For further information, please see Note 3(iv) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
41
Acquisition of Meida Computers Software Solutions (G.D) Ltd. On July 3, 2024, Michpal acquired 60% of the outstanding share capital of Meida Computers Software Solutions (G.D) Ltd., (“Meida”) for a total consideration of approximately $12.49 million and up to additional of approximately $0.8 million in contingent consideration, subject to the achievement of targets set in relation to Meida’s operating profit for the year 2024. Meida engages in the development and marketing of advanced solutions for recruitment and human resources management processes. Meida develops and markets “Adam Total,” a leading platform for candidate recruitment and screening in Israel, which integrates artificial intelligence technologies for candidate sourcing and matching, as well as advanced analytical tools for performance analysis and data-driven decision-making. For further information, please see Note 3(iv) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Y-IT Ltd. On October 13, 2024, Michpal acquired 60% of the outstanding share capital of Y-IT Ltd. (“Y-IT”) an Israeli based company, for a total consideration of approximately $22.2 million and committed to pay the seller additional contingent consideration subject to Y-IT’s operating profit for the year 2024. Y-IT engages in the development and marketing of a technology platform for managing and optimizing transportation operations and vehicle fleets for companies in the transportation sector. The platform is based on algorithms and automation processes, monitoring tools, attendance data processing and preliminary payroll calculations, advanced financial management tools tailored for the transportation sector, as well as analytical tools for performance management and operational optimization. Y-IT serves over 550 clients in the Israeli transportation industry. For further information, please see Note 3(iv) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Paperless Ltd. On December 24, 2024, Michpal acquired 70% of the outstanding share capital of Paperless Ltd. (“Paperless”), for a total consideration of approximately $2.3 million (of which approximately $0.8 million was paid in January 2025), and committed to pay the seller additional contingent consideration subject to Paperless’ operating profit for the years 2024 through 2026 (hereinafter – the “Contingent Consideration”). Paperless is the developer of the cloud-based Paperless platform for digital and online paperless accounting management. The platform is designed for finance professionals, accountants, and tax advisors, and integrates advanced technologies for the automation of accounting processes, including digital invoice processing and automatic journal entry recording. The platform helps its clients improve the efficiency, convenience, and reliability of their financial reporting processes. For further information, please see Note 3(iv) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Acquisition of Emalogic Software Ltd., or Emalogic. On June 22, 2023, our subsidiary Michpal acquired a 75% share interest in Emalogic Software Ltd., an Israeli provider of software development services, for a total consideration of NIS 23.8 million (approximately $6.4 million) or NIS 14.4 million (approximately $3.9 million) net of acquired cash. Michpal and the seller hold mutual call and put options, respectively, for the remaining 25% share interest in Emalogic. The options can be exercised within 90 days after the approval of Emalogic’s annual audited financial statements for 2026 or 2027. The fair value of the put option measured on the acquisition date amounted to NIS 6.1 million (approximately $1.7 million). Emalogic is a software service provider that specializes in the development of mission-critical systems, starting from the characterization phase and through the maintenance phase. Emalogic holds extensive knowledge in the development field of user experience (UX) and user interface (UI) allowing it to provide a complete end-to-end software solution. Emalogic operates in 4 main sectors - financial, automotive, freight and cloud. Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. For further information, please see Note 3(iv) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
42
Acquisition of Formally Smart Form System Ltd., or Formally. On February 16, 2022, Michpal acquired 70% of the share capital of Formally, for a total consideration of NIS 44.8 million (approximately $14.4 million) or NIS 43.8 million (approximately $14.1 million) net of acquired cash. Michpal and the seller hold mutual call and put options, respectively, for the remaining 30% share interest in Formally. The options can be exercised during every year starting from January 1, 2023 in 3 equal portions of 10% each and for a period of 3 years thereafter (i.e. 10% of Formally outstanding share capital as of 1.1.23 and for a period of 3 years thereafter; 10% as of 1.1.24 and for a period of 3 years thereafter and 10% as of 1.1.24 and for a period of 3 years thereafter). Formally is an Israeli-based company and the creator of Formally Smart Form platform – a central server platform for managing knowledge and work processes, and for producing digital forms combined with a legally-binding eSignature technology allowing customers to create impressive documents in minutes and get them signed in a snap. Formally offers a variety of proprietary computerized and advanced tools for managing business processes trusted by Israel’s largest financial, banking, and insurance enterprises. Its “no-code” platform, allows to convert outdated forms into a digital process for any company freeing IT teams from ongoing maintenance issues and enables employees across the organization to deliver new digital products quickly and efficiently.
Acquisition by Zap Group:
In February 2022, Zap Group completed the acquisition of 49.9% of the entire minority rights in its controlled partnership, Winhelp Ofran, a provider of digital advertising solutions for domestic travel businesses in Israel, for consideration of NIS 11.0 million (or approximately $3.5 million).
In December 2022 Zap Group concluded the acquisition of 51% of the outstanding share capital of N.C Marketing and Advertising Ltd. (also known as “Safra digital marketing”) and 51% of the outstanding share capital of Marcomit Ltd. (“Marcomit”). Safra digital marketing is an Israeli company specializing in social media services including Facebook, Instagram and Tik-tok. Marcomit is an Israeli company specializing in digital branding for large enterprises including advanced branding materials for media and digital advertising. The total consideration paid for these acquisitions amounted to approximately $3.5 million, or $2.8 million net of acquired cash. As part of the purchase agreements, the sellers of Safra digital marketing and Marcomit may be entitled to additional future consideration contingent upon meeting certain future operating profit targets. The fair value of such contingent considerations as of the acquisition date amounted to $0.7 million. As of December 31, 2023, the fair value of such contingent consideration amounted to $36 thousand, resulting from the reversal of $650 thousand to profit and loss in 2023. Zap and the minority shareholders of Safra digital marketing and Marcomit hold mutual call and put options for the remaining 49% interest.
Acquisition by Insync Staffing:
Acquisition of Bear Staffing Services Corporation. On December 12, 2022, Insync Staffing acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Bear Staffing, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Florida for a total consideration of $7.7 million (excluding $8.6 million of acquired cash) with $5.3 million paid in cash at closing with $0.6 million paid in March 2023 and deferred payments of $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively due on the first and second anniversary of the closing date. Bear Staffing Corporation is a staffing agency providing talent for industries such as manufacturing, distribution, and call centers. Since its inception, Bear Staffing Corporation has provided more than 50,000 employees to over 2,000 employers across the United States. Leveraging leading-edge recruiting technology and their recruiting model, Bear Staffing has been able to find, attract, place, and retain talent for their clients nationwide. As a staffing agency that specializes in high-volume industries and skill sets, Bear Staffing’s objective is to provide targeted and efficient staffing solutions to meet the specific needs of their clients.
43
| B. | Business Overview |
General
We are a global information technology company that is principally engaged through our directly held investees in providing software consulting services and computer-based business solutions, and in developing proprietary software products. We deliver our solutions in numerous countries worldwide to customers with complex IT services needs, including a number of “Fortune 1000” companies.
We provide our investees with our management, technical expertise and marketing experience to help them create a consecutive positive economic impact and long-term value and direct their overall strategy through our active involvement. We carry out those activities at the level of our investees rather than at our parent company level.
We operate through our subsidiaries— Matrix, Sapiens, Magic Software, Michpal, Zap Group, InSync, Shamrad, Ofek Aerial Photography and Hashahar Telecom— and through our equity investees TSG Systems and one other associate. We describe below the areas of our business activity:
IT Services
We design and implement IT solutions and software systems which improve the productivity of our customers’ existing IT assets, enable them to effectively manage their operations and reduce their business risks in the face of changing business environments. In delivering our IT services, we at times use proprietary software developed by members of the Formula Group. We provide our IT services across the full system development life cycle, including definition of business requirements, developing customized software, implementing software and modifying it based on the customer’s needs, system analysis, technical specifications, coding, testing, training, implementation and maintenance. We perform our projects on-site or at our own facilities.
We are successful in providing our services to the defense sector, utilities sector, telecommunication, healthcare, local administration, and our subsidiary Matrix is recognized as the market leader in Israel in the implementation of fastest-growing technologies, such as cloud, cyber, digital, data, DevOps and AI, which enable us to create significant value for our customers in managing, streamlining, accelerating and making their businesses thrive.
Proprietary Software Solutions
We design, develop and market proprietary software solutions for sale in selected niche markets worldwide. We regularly seek opportunities to invest in or acquire companies with attractive proprietary software solutions under development which we believe to have market potential. All of our investments and acquisitions in this area have been in companies with products beyond the prototype stage. In addition, from time to time, we selectively invest in companies with proven technology where we believe we can leverage our experience to enhance product positioning and increase market penetration. We provide our management and technical and financial expertise, marketing experience and financial resources to help bring these products to market. We also assist the members of our group to form teaming agreements with strategic partners to develop a presence in international markets and to raise debt and capital.
The Formula Group
Formula is the parent company of investees, which, as noted above, we refer to collectively (together with Formula) as the Formula Group. As of December 31, 2024, we held 90.1% of the shares of InSync, an 80% interest in Ofek Aerial Photography, a 51% interest in Hashahar Telecom, a 48.2% interest in Matrix, a 43.5% interest in Sapiens, a 46.7% interest in Magic Software, a 42.7% interest in TSG Systems and 21.45% in an additional entity through our equity holdings, and the entire share capital of Michpal, Zap Group, and Shamrad. We have effective control of each of the companies in the Formula Group other than TSG Systems for purposes of consolidation under IFRS 10. We provide all of our investees our management, technical and financial expertise, and our marketing experience, thereby asserting a positive economic impact upon, and creating long-term value for, our investees.
44
We direct the overall strategy of our investees. While our investees each have independent management, we monitor their growth through our active involvement in the following matters:
| ● | strategic planning; |
| ● | marketing policies; |
| ● | senior management recruitment; |
| ● | investment and budget policy; |
| ● | financing policies; and |
| ● | support for the process of raising debt and capital. |
We promote the synergy and cooperation among our investees by encouraging the following:
| ● | transfer of technology and expertise; |
| ● | leveling of human resources demand; |
| ● | combining skills for specific projects; |
| ● | formation of critical mass for large projects; and |
| ● | marketing and selling the Formula Group’s products and services to its collective customer base. |
We, through our investees, offer a wide range of integrated software solutions and IT professional services, such as implementation and integration projects of computing and software, outsourcing, software project management, software development, IT managed services, operating a network of high-tech training and instruction centers, providing software testing and QA, depending on specific needs of the customer and depending on the subject expertise necessary on a case by case basis, and design, develop and market proprietary software solutions for sale in selected niche markets, both in Israel and worldwide. Formula’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer serve as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Magic Software as well, and Formula’s Chief Executive Officer also serves as Chairman of the Board of each of Sapiens and Matrix and TSG Systems.
As of the date of this annual report, the global economy faces a significant degree of uncertainty related to the potential imposition of new and/or reciprocal tariffs by the United States and other countries, the level of those tariffs, and the degree of adverse impact that may have on a number of important macroeconomic indicators, including inflation, interest rates, and the pace of economic growth. During 2024, the world economy continued its trend of moderate growth, which was in part facilitated by a further reduction in inflation rates around the globe and stabilization of interest rates throughout the year. The trend of increased price levels in the world that had begun towards the end of 2021 and intensified in 2022 subsided in 2023 and 2024, enabling central banks to gradually reduce interest rates in a moderate manner to spur growth.
In the U.S., the inflation rate decreased to a level of approximately 2.8% as of February 2025 in annual terms based on the last 12 months - LTM). As of March 2025, the interest rate in the U.S. stabilized at approximately 4.25% to 4.5% and the Federal Reserve Bank of the U.S. has paused its prior series of rate reductions. The Eurozone also experienced in 2024 a stabilization of interest rates and a reduction of inflation levels (reaching the target level of 2.0% late in 2024 before rising again in early 2025).
45
The main global economic trends detailed above took place to a large extent in the Israeli economy as well. At the same time, the Israeli economy continued to experience in the past year ongoing unique and complex local events that had a substantial impact. The year 2024 and the start of 2025 have seen the continuation of Israel’s war against surrounding terrorist groups and hostile countries. The long duration of the war, and the uncertainty as to the degree of its future intensity, and its results, had led to a downward revision of the growth forecast and an expected increase in the government deficit and the debt-to-GDP ratio. In actuality, though, despite the war, Israel's GDP grew by 1% in 2024, above initial forecasts. There was a continued recovery in the last quarter of 2024, with growth of 2.5% on an annualized basis, following a jump of 5.3% in the third quarter. However, the GDP level is still lower than the pre-war period. Business output recorded a decline of 0.6% in 2024, with overall growth in the economy supported mainly by a sharp increase of 13.7% in government spending for public needs, which was largely due to war expenses. Defense spending jumped by 43.3%, while civilian spending increased by only 4.2%.
Unlike the global trend, during the past year inflation in Israel increased from a low annual rate of 2.6% and 2.5% in January and February 2024 to a peak of 3.6% in August 2024, before stabilizing throughout the remainder of 2024 and the start of 2025, with an annual rate of 3.3% in March 2025 (in annual terms based on the last 12 months - LTM). The Bank of Israel left in place an interest rate of 4.5% throughout 2024 and through the first three months of 2025.
As a Group that provides solutions, products, and services in the field of information systems, we compete with other companies in the Israeli high-tech industry for quality personnel. In addition, a significant portion of our sales target companies in the high-tech industry. The year 2024 marked a period of moderate growth in the high-tech sector in Israel and around the world. This moderate growth was the result of many factors, including moderate GDP growth, an increase by 40% in capital raising in the industry (in Israel), and reductions in the number of layoffs overall. Despite the ongoing war and the resulting complications in the Israeli economy, 2024 was more successful for Israeli high-tech companies raising capital than 2023. In 2024, 453 reported deals in 2024 attracted $9.6 billion, there was an increase of 15% in number of rounds, and an increase of 39% up in capital raised, compared to 2023. In 2024, the number of high-tech employees in Israel fell by 1.2%, or approximately 5,000 employees, compared to the previous year. As of December 2024, the number of job vacancies in Israeli high-tech reached about 17,000, marking a potential return to growth, according to the Israel Innovation Authority.
Against the backdrop of the effects of Israel’s ongoing war, the international credit rating agencies lowered the credit rating of the State of Israel, as well as changed their outlook in negative directions. The main motive for downgrading the credit rating is the ratings agencies’ assessment that the lateral consequences of the current conflict with Hamas, both during and afterwards, substantially increase the risks of the State of Israel, and may damage the country’s fiscal strength in the foreseeable future. Despite the limited negative impact of the war on our Israeli based operations, our Israeli based activities in the fourth quarter of 2024 reflected continued increase in volume of activity, revenues, profit, and cash flow, which compensated for the effects of the war. In the medium and long term, as long as the war continues and has a negative impact on the level of economic activity in the entire Israeli economy or on certain sectors of activity (such as commerce, industry, real estate, retail, tourism, etc.), and/or on certain government offices and bodies (for cutting office budgets in favor of increasing the defense budget to finance the war), this may affect the financial strength of some of our Israeli clients and/or lead to a reduction in demand and a reduction in their IT procurement budgets, and accordingly affect the scope of our Israeli based activities with those clients and/or affect their payment ability.
In parallel to the potential negative effects, there are several factors in connection with our Israel-based activities that may moderate the aforementioned effects, including:
| o | We maintain a significant customer base (over 5,000 active customers), most of them large and financially stable companies and entities. |
46
| o | Our activities abroad account for approximately 40% of our revenues and such activities are not expected to be influenced by the ongoing war. |
| o | We maintain extensive activity in strong sectors such as government, public bodies, security, insurance and finance, health, and transportation. |
| o | We have limited activity with medium and small customers whose exposure to the effects of the war in Israel is relatively high. |
| o | We have a wide diversification of areas of activity, including areas of activity that are relatively resistant to potential negative effects of the war in Israel, such as the cyber, defense, the cloud, and more. |
Our Subsidiaries
Matrix
Matrix IT Ltd. is Israel’s leading IT services company as demonstrated in recent research reports of the Israeli IT market, published by the research companies IDC and STKI. Matrix employs approximately 11,570 software, hardware, integration, engineering and training personnel, who provide advanced IT services to hundreds of customers in the Israeli market as well as to customers in the U.S market. Matrix executes some of the largest IT projects in Israel. It develops and implements leading technologies, software solutions and products. Matrix provides infrastructure and consulting services, outsourcing, offshore, near-shore, training and assimilation services. Matrix represents and markets leading software vendors. Among its customers are most of the leading Israeli organizations and companies in the industry, retail, banking and finances, education and academe, Hi-tech and start-ups, transportation, defense, healthcare and the government/public sectors. Matrix also markets. sells and distributes software solutions and hardware representing wide variety of software vendors from Israel and around the world. Matrix’s shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.
The solutions, services and products supplied by Matrix are designed to improve Matrix’s customers’ competitive capabilities, by providing a response to their unique IT needs in all levels of their operations.
Areas of Operation
Matrix operates through its directly and indirectly held subsidiaries in the following four principal areas of activity:
| - | Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services, Consulting & Management in Israel. |
| - | Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services in the United States. |
| - | Cloud and computing infrastructure |
| - | Sales, marketing and support of software products. |
47
Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services, Consulting & Management in Israel
Matrix’s activities related to IT solutions and services, consulting and management in Israel includes a wide range of technological and other solutions and services in the areas of enterprise core systems, data and AI, cybersecurity, digital solutions, and more. Among these solutions, the Company engages in the development of large-scale technological systems and the provision of related services, the execution of IT and software integration projects, and the development of operational solutions and systems - C4ISR for security organizations in Israel and worldwide, outsourcing services, professional services by experts and consultants, offshore/nearshore services, BPO and Call Center services, software project management, software development, software testing and QA, enhancement and upgrading of existing technological systems, as well as training and implementation services. In addition, this activity includes management consulting and multidisciplinary engineering and operational consulting services, including supervision of complex engineering projects, particularly infrastructure projects in the transportation sector. As reflected in its 2024 financial statements, Matrix now presents the training and implementation activity, which was presented in the past as a separate operating segment and constituted approximately 3.4% and 2.9% of Matrix’s total sales and operating profit in 2023, as part of the IT solutions and services, Consulting, and Management Solutions in Israel segment. This is due to changes in the economic environment and, accordingly, changes in the activity mix within the training and implementation segment, such that the economic characteristics, nature of services, and types of clients in the training and implementation segment are similar to those of the Information Technology solutions and services, Consulting, and Management segment in Israel.
In 2024, under this line of business Matrix recorded revenues of approximately NIS 3.227 billion (approximately $872.6 million) compared to NIS 2.856 billion (approximately $775.0 million) in 2023, an increase of approximately 13.0% when measured in NIS. Operating income in 2024 was approximately NIS 240.4 million (approximately $65.0 million) compared to approximately NIS192.5 million (approximately $52.3 million) in 2023, an increase of approximately 24.9% when measured in NIS. In 2024, activity in Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services, Consulting & Management in Israel accounted for approximately 57.8% of Matrix’s revenues and approximately 53.4% of its operating income. The increase in revenues and operating income were primarily attributable to the aggregation of Matrix’s Training and integration line of business under its Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services, Consulting & Management in Israel segment and to organic growth in the scope of operations and profit in all areas of the segmental operations, with emphasis on core systems, professional services, and defense operations.
Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services in the United States
Matrix’s activities in this segment are performed by two divisions – Matrix US Holdings and Xtivia. The two divisions primarily provide software solutions and services of Governance Risk and Compliance, or GRC, experts, including activities on the following topics: financial risk management, fraud prevention management, cyber risk mitigation, anti-money laundering and ensuring regulatory compliance in these matters, as well as, specialized advisory services in the area of compliance with financial regulation and operational services, payment services, as well as solutions and specialized technological services in areas such as: portals, BI (Business Intelligence) DBA (Data Base Administration), CRM (Customer Relation Management) and EIM (Enterprise Information Management). Furthermore, the activity under this line of business includes dedicated solutions for the GovCon Government contracting market, IT help desk services specializing in healthcare and software product distribution services particularly for IBM, BMC and Atlassian products to customers in the public-government sector in the U.S. Matrix provides offshore solutions in this segment, including through employees in Matrix’s operational centers in India. The operations also include professional services and projects carried out by experts from across the Matrix group, serving as a gateway to the business model of exporting Matrix’s services and products to the U.S. market.
In 2024, under this line of business, Matrix recorded revenues of approximately NIS 460.0 million (approximately $124.4 million) compared to NIS 478.4 million (approximately $129.8 million) in 2023, a decrease of 4.2% when measured in U.S dollars. Operating income in 2024 was approximately NIS 66.9 million (approximately $18.1 million), compared to approximately NIS 76.2 million (approximately $20.7 million) in 2023, a decrease of approximately 12.2% when measured in U.S dollars. In 2024, the activity in the U.S. accounted for approximately 8.2% of Matrix’s revenues and approximately 14.9% of its operating income. The decrease in revenues in this segment during 2024 resulted from the completion of several Governance, Risk and Compliance, or GRC, projects during the course of the period. This impact was only partially compensated for by new customer engagements that are expected to be reflected in the scope of operations and earnings amount over the course of 2025. The first-time consolidation of Alacer's operating results in the fourth quarter of 2024 did not significantly affect the results in 2024.
48
Cloud and computing infrastructures
Matrix’s activities in this segment primarily include providing a wide range of cloud solutions and services, including sales, service, and support for public cloud (PaaS, SaaS, IaaS) and private cloud at all implementation stages— consulting, architecture, development, deployment, environment management, and support— as well as advanced FinOps services (through the Company's specialized business unit, CloudZone). This segment’s activities also include computing solutions for IT infrastructure, communication solutions, marketing and sales of hardware, software licenses, and peripheral equipment for business customers, along with related professional services. Additionally, Matrix offers multimedia solutions and command-and-control centers for smart offices, office automation and printing solutions, sales and marketing of test and measurement equipment, communication, cybersecurity, and RF solutions, automation projects and integration, advanced calibration services, and industrial video and image processing solutions (through RDT Equipment and Systems and Asio Vision). Furthermore, Matrix is engaged in the import, sales, and service of automated manufacturing machines for component assembly and automated testing machines for assembly processes and components in production lines across various industries, including industrial, medical, military, laser, and sensor applications for civilian and defense purposes, as well as optical communication systems and automotive radar systems.
In 2024, under this line of business, Matrix recorded revenues of approximately NIS 1,465.9 million (approximately $396.3 million), compared to approximately NIS 1,431 million (approximately $388.3 million) in 2023, an increase of approximately 2.4% when measured in NIS. Operating income in 2024 was approximately NIS 106.4 million (approximately $28.8 million), compared to approximately NIS 88.0 million (approximately $23.9 million), an increase of approximately 21.0% when measured in NIS. In 2024, activity in computer and cloud infrastructure and integration solutions accounted for approximately 26.3% of Matrix’s revenues and for approximately 23.6% of its operating income. The increase in operating income is mainly attributable to Matrix’s continued cultivation of cloud computing annual recurring revenues (ARR), and increased demand for Matrix’s products and services under this line of business recorded across various fields of activities. The minor increase in revenues in oppose to the double-digit increase recorded in operating income is primarily attributable to the continued growth in the proportion of Enterprise Discount Program (“EDP”) cloud transactions within this operating segment, the revenues from which are recognized on a net basis, relative to the total volume of cloud transactions.
Sales, marketing and support of software products
Matrix’s activities in this segment primarily consist of the sale and distribution of software products (mainly from foreign software manufacturers) across various fields, such as control and monitoring products, cybersecurity, communication solutions, virtualization, knowledge management products, databases and Big Data, open-source systems, and IT management products. This segment’s activities also include providing professional support services for these products, as well as implementation projects, training, support, and maintenance for integrated products and systems.
In 2024, under this line of business, Matrix recorded revenues of approximately NIS 426.0 million (approximately $115.2 million) compared to approximately NIS 294.2 million (approximately $79.8 million) in 2023, an increase of approximately 44.8% when measured in NIS. Operating income in 2024 was approximately NIS 36.4 million (approximately $9.8 million), compared to approximately NIS 29.9 million (approximately $8.1 million) in 2023, reflecting year-over-year growth of 21.7% when measured in NIS. In 2024, activity in Sales, marketing and support of software products accounted for approximately 7.6% of Matrix’s revenues and approximately 8.1% of its operating income. The increases in both revenues and operating income were primarily attributable to the overall increase in the demand for Matrix’s offerings under this line of business. It should be noted that Zebra is mainly engaged in distribution and marketing of software products in the fields of cyber protection and data communication, and in accordance with accounting rules most of its revenues are presented on a net basis and carries significantly higher operating margin compared to other activities under this line of business.
49
Matrix provides solutions, services and products primarily to the following market sectors (or verticals): banking and finance; high-tech and startups; industry, retail and trade; government and the public sector, security; transportation, health; and education and academia.
Matrix offers to each market sector a broad range of solutions and services, customized for the specific needs of that sector. Matrix operates dedicated departments, each of which specializes in a particular sector. Each such department supplies customers in that sector with products and services offerings that provide a response to most of the customer’s IT requirements, based on an in-depth business understanding of the challenges which are typical to that sector. Matrix established a separate division for each particular market sector, which manages the operations relating to that sector.
Specialization in the various sectors is reflected in the applications, professional and marketing aspects of each sector. Accordingly, the professional and marketing infrastructure required to support each market sector is developed to address such sector’s specific needs.
In addition to the four focused areas of activity described above, Matrix operates cross-organizational units providing specialized services across all areas of activity and sectors, as follows:
| ● | Expertise centers – Matrix operates approximately 30 “expertise centers” (“Centers of Excellence”), in areas such as: AI, machine learning, Digital, Cloud, Customer Experience, Mobile, Data, Security & Cyber, Learning Technology, DevOps, Agile & ALM, ERP, CRM, Smart Campus, Low Code Data Bricks, etc. These Centers of Excellence are based on an organizational approach aimed at providing significant professional and technological added value to both Matrix’s development teams and its customers. This includes expert groups specializing in various content areas, hands-on experience with specialized technologies, an implementation framework (including, among other things, methodologies and best practices) that shortens time-to-market and reduces risks, technological guidance from Matrrix’s CTO team, and more. |
| ● | Matrix R&D and Offshore Services – Matrix provides expert services for software development roles, as well as software testing and quality assurance services, using offshore and nearshore models. | |
| ● | Comprehensive management/engineering consulting services - Comprehensive management and engineering consulting services, from strategy formulation and management consulting to execution and change implementation. This includes managing complex projects, such as large-scale engineering projects, extensive engineering supervision projects, particularly in the transportation sector, national infrastructure projects, and projects in planning and environmental quality. Additionally, Matrix provides multidisciplinary engineering consulting services as well as consulting and implementation services in supply chain management and operational logistics management. |
50
Sapiens
Overview
Sapiens is a global leader in providing intelligent insurance of software solutions for the insurance industry. Sapiens extensive expertise is reflected in its innovative software platforms, suites, solutions and services for property & casualty (P&C); life, pension & annuity (L&A); reinsurance; financial and compliance (F&C); workers’ compensation (WC); medical professional liability (MPL); financial & compliance (F&C); and decision modelling for both insurance and financial markets. Sapiens offers a future-proof, AI-based, open, modular and integrated insurance platform, which accelerates adoption, delivers sustained value and empowers insurers to stay ahead. Sapiens Insurance Platform allows insurers to grow with a comprehensive but modular offering, supporting end-to-end insurance processes across all lines of business. Sapiens Insurance Platform, which is their flagship offering across all aspects of the insurance market, is built on key technological themes that serve as the foundational pillars for developing all our business solutions, and providing end-to-end coverage of insurance carriers’ needs, through:
| ● | Core policy administration layer – providing full E2E support for administering insurance products, policies, billing and claims |
| ● | Data layer – including a wide offering to manage various aspects of data, from data warehouse and data lake, though reporting and dashboards, to ML predictive models and GenAI capabilities and use cases |
| ● | Digital layer – providing comprehensive digital engagement layer with persona-based portals, no-code tools for building digital journeys, and 360 customer view |
| ● | Infrastructure layer – including common architecture and technical capabilities, such as SaaS and Cloud management, DevOps, role-based security and more |
Importantly, Sapiens’ wide array of professional services ensures that Sapiens not only make a sale but accompany and guide its customers on their path to digital transformation and bring important insights from the field into its products roadmap. Sapiens also sells software products to non-insurance customers, which accounts for less than 5% of its revenue.
In 2024, Sapiens continued to grow strongly, as it continued to build upon its existing business, adding new logos, and utilizing the companies and technologies recently acquired to accelerate its customers’ digital transformation, while also investing significantly in its solutions over the course of the year. The vast majority of Sapiens’ revenue growth in 2024 and 2023 reflected organic growth of 5.0% and 8.1% respectively, given the absence of material M&A transactions (other than its acquisition of the remaining outstanding shares of Sapiens Software Solutions (Decision) Ltd. from its minority shareholders in the first quarter of 2024, which did not impact revenues materially). Sapiens revenue for 2024 grew by $27.8 million, or 5.4%, as opposed to 8.4% in 2023. With a multitude of growth drivers at Sapiens disposal, including regional and product diversification, Sapiens management believe that Sapiens is strategically positioned for continued growth in 2025.
Sapiens’ platforms possess modern, modular architecture and are digital-driven, providing full coverage for all business aspects of policy management, digital engagement and data analysis. They empower customers to respond to the rapidly changing insurance market and frequent regulatory changes, while improving the efficiency of their core operations. These process enhancements increase revenue and reduce costs.
Overview of Sapiens Software Solutions
Sapiens’ software portfolio is comprised of:
| ● | Property & Casualty – a comprehensive software platform and solutions supporting a broad range of business lines, including personal, commercial, MPL and specialty lines, as well as reinsurance and workers’ compensation (see below). Sapiens core solutions are pre-integrated with their DigitalSuite, analytics and decision modeling solutions, all of which are also available stand-alone. Sapiens’ portfolio includes Sapiens Insurance Platform for Property & Casualty, which is comprised of commonly shared Data and Digital solutions and two core suites: Sapiens CoreSuite for Property & Casualty (for North America) and Sapiens IDITSuite for Property & Casualty (for EMEA and APAC). We provide a flexible proposition where Insurers can choose between deploying our full core suite or one or more of our standalone components: policy, billing and claims. |
| ● | Life, Pension & Annuities – a comprehensive, cloud-based, digital software platform, suite and complementary solutions for the management of a diversified range of products for life, pension & annuities. Our core solutions are pre-integrated with our DigitalSuite, analytics and decision modeling solutions, all of which are also available stand alone. Our portfolio includes Sapiens Platform for Life, Pension & Annuities, Sapiens CoreSuite for Life, Pension & Annuities; Sapiens UnderwritingPro for Life & Annuities; Sapiens ApplicationPro for Life & Annuities; Sapiens IllustrationPro for Life & Annuities; and Sapiens ConsolidationMaster for Life & Pension. |
51
| ● |
Digital – Sapiens Cloud-based DigitalSuite enables insurers to incorporate a fully digital experience for customers, agents and employers, enhancing insurers’ engagement with customers, enhancing their end-consumers’ experience and fostering a rapid time to market for new digital initiatives. Sapiens Digital Suite is pre-integrated as part of Sapiens’ comprehensive platforms or can be deployed stand-alone on top of any 3rd party core solution already in place. Comprised of innovative digital modules and content libraries to facilitate diverse customer journeys, DigitalSuite includes: low-code/no code Journey Composer, insurance-driven API Layer, and portal solutions for customers, agents and employers. Sapiens have also added an AI driven chat-bot solution (BotConnect) which knows to hand off to a live agent (LiveConnect) to facilitate omnichannel communications. |
| ● | Data and Analytics – together with Sapiens’ digital offering, Sapiens offers an advanced data and analytics platform, which includes: an analytics platform that drives analytics adoption across the organization with compelling, insightful dashboards and apps; a comprehensive BI solution with pre-configured reports, dashboards and scorecards; predictive analytics, which uses AI and Machine Learning to generate actionable insights based on different models across the insurance value chain. | |
| ● | Reinsurance – a market-leading complete reinsurance software solutions for full financial control and auditing support. Sapiens’ portfolio includes Sapiens ReinsuranceMaster, Sapiens ReinsurancePro and Sapiens Reinsurance GO, providing solutions to various sizes of insurance companies. |
| ● | Workers’ Compensation – Sapiens workers’ compensation offerings handle comprehensive policy/billing and claims needs. Sapiens’ solution portfolio includes Sapiens CoreSuite for Workers’ Compensation and Sapiens GO for Workers’ Compensation, which can be deployed as a full suite or in a modular manner (policy / billing / claims), and are pre-integrated with Sapiens’ DigitalSuite and its Analytics solutions. |
| ● |
Medical Professional Liability (“MPL”) – Sapiens MPL offering provides a complete end-to-end solution for managing the insurance processes for the medical malpractice market, including policy management, billing and claims, all adjusted to the unique characteristics of this specific market. The Sapiens Digital and Data platforms are also pre-integrated into the MPL core solution and thus providing additional value add and benefits to Sapiens MPL customer base.
| |
| ● | Financial & Compliance – Sapiens offers financial & compliance solutions comprised of both annual statement and insurance accounting software. This software includes Sapiens FinancialPro, Sapiens Financial GO, Sapiens StatementPro, Sapiens CheckPro and Sapiens Reporting Tools. |
| ● | Decision Management – Sapiens Decision is an enterprise-scale platform that enables institutions and “citizen developers” across verticals to centrally author, store and manage all organizational business logic. Organizations use it to track, verify and ensure that every decision is based on the most up-to-date rules and policies. Our Decision management products are offered across verticals (including commercial banking, investment banking, mortgage banking, insurance – for both P&C and life, government, etc.). |
| ● | Technology-Based – tailor-made solutions (unrelated to the insurance or financial services market) based on Sapiens eMerge platform, which provides end-to-end, modular business solutions, ensuring rapid time to market. |
52
Sapiens’ Marketplace and its Needs
Sapiens’ Target Markets
Sapiens operates in a large market undergoing significant transformation.
Sapiens operates in a large market undergoing significant transformation. According to the Gartner report, “Forecast: Enterprise IT Spending for the Insurance Market, Worldwide, 2022-2028, 3Q24 Update” (a market statistics research report by Gartner, a research and consulting firm, written by Rajesh Narayan, James Ingham, Inna Agamirzian and Rika Narisawa that was published in November 2024,, and covers internal services, IT services, software, telecom services, devices, and data centers systems, which we refer to herein as the “Gartner report”), Gartner forecasted global insurance market IT spending to grow by 9.3% in 2025 and to reach nearly $260 billion in U.S. dollars. This industry is predicted to reach $336 billion by 2028, growing at an 8.9.% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2023 through 2028. This growth will be driven by an increase in software spending and IT services spending at CAGRs of 13.7% and 19.0%, respectively, according to the Gartner Report.
Gartner forecasts that total insurance IT spending on software in 2025 will be $71.2 billion (software includes application software (analytics and business intelligence; back office/ERP and supply chain; front office/CRM; collaboration), infrastructure software (application development and middleware; information management; storage management software; and system and network management), and vertical industry-specific applications. Gartner forecasts global IT spending in insurance will increase by 9.3% in 2025 to reach $260.5 billion in constant U.S. dollars. From 2023 to 2028, the spending is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 8.9%, driven by the growth in software and IT services at a CAGR of 13.5% and 15.3%, respectively. Total insurance IT spending on software in 2025 will be $71.2 billion.
Sapiens estimates that its current total addressable market for core insurance software solutions and the accompanied point solutions and the corresponding part of IT services is approximately $60 billion, which it expects will grow as a result of insurance carriers’ and financial institutions’ need to better address customers’ needs, via modernizing software solutions from external providers, to overcome operational challenges presented by the inefficiency of their legacy core.
The insurance market is a large, complex and highly regulated environment. Insurance carriers operate in a super-competitive and quickly evolving ecosystem, which necessitates differentiating their value propositions. Additionally, providers operate under a rigid regulatory regime that demands fast compliance. The insurance market is going through a rapid evolution process, driven by the needs and demands of their customers, complex and evolving ecosystems, digital distribution channels and new business models, all enabled by new technologies.
To efficiently manage their operations, insurance carriers require IT platforms that enable rapid introduction of changes via configurable, user-driven activities, integration with internal and external systems, control and auditing of employees’ work, support for omni-channel distribution and clear visibility into the carrier’s business operations, through streamlining and intelligent usage of data.
To compete in the rapidly changing environment, and win the competition for end customers, insurance carriers require a coherent digital proposition, allowing them to better interact with their customers in a digital and omni-channel manner. They are increasingly using robotics, predictive analytics, AI and machine learning to automate processes and obtain stronger business insights. The cloud can also be utilized for improved operations and scale.
Insurance carriers are experiencing substantial operational challenges due to the inefficiency of their legacy policy administration systems and their lack of digitalization. These legacy systems, which include both technical and functional limitations, acutely impact carriers’ ability to cope with growing challenges, such as the need for innovation, the shift of power to the consumer, and the dynamic and constantly changing regulatory environment.
53
Property & Casualty Market
Property & casualty insurance protects policyholders against a range of losses on items of value. P&C insurance includes the personal segment, which is insurance coverage for individuals, with products such as motor, home, personal property and travel; the commercial segment, covering aspects of commercial activity, such as commercial property, car fleets, cyber and professional liability; and specialty lines, covering unique domains, such as marine, art and credit insurance. This market also includes workers’ compensation for market carriers, administrators and state funds, and Medical Professional Liability for health care professionals.
During the past few years, the P&C market has been characterized by a fast rate of digital adoption. New business and technology models are adopted rapidly, to launch innovative business offerings. This requires advanced software solutions, both on the core layer, which need to be flexible and open, and with the variety of digital tools addressing customer experience needs.
Life, Pension & Annuity Markets
Life, pension & annuity providers offer their customers a wide range of products for long-term savings, protection, pension and insurance. They assist policyholders with financial planning through life insurance, medical and investment products. Their products can be classified into several areas, primarily investment and savings, risk and protection, pension and health-related products. These products can be targeted to individuals, as well as group- and employee-benefit types of products.
The products in this field are long-term in nature. When insurance providers consider purchasing new platforms from Sapiens, the decision is typically slower and involves multiple decision-makers throughout the organization.
Reinsurance Market
Reinsurance is insurance that is purchased by an insurance company (ceded reinsurance) from another insurance company (assumed reinsurance) as a means of risk management. The reinsurer and the insurer enter into a reinsurance agreement, which details the conditions upon which the reinsurer would pay the insurer’s losses. The reinsurer is paid a reinsurance premium by the insurer and the insurer issues insurance policies to its own policyholders. The insurer must maintain an accurate system of records to track its reinsurance contracts and treaties, to avoid claims leakage.
Workers’ Compensation
Workers’ compensation is one of the largest lines of business in the P&C industry in North America. But future profitability is getting harder to maintain, with medical and indemnity costs per lost time claim increasing at rates greater than inflation. Insurance organizations require technology solutions that can adapt quickly to business and market conditions, offering high levels of accuracy and efficiency.
Financial & Compliance Market
Financial professionals face overwhelming challenges as they struggle to satisfy ever-changing regulatory requirements, while meeting the demands of managerial reporting. The move towards globalization has introduced new currencies, and CEOs need more performance data for strategic decision-making. Organizations require one partner to optimize efficiencies with solutions that can be implemented quickly.
Decision Management Market
Increasing competition, regulatory burden, customer experience expectations and the proliferation of digital and product innovation requirements have necessitated a shift in thinking and approach among organizations across verticals. By replacing conventional policy and process management with the discipline known as “decision management,” financial institutions are bridging the gap between business and IT, by enabling business users to rapidly frame requirements in formal business models that can be easily understood by all stakeholders.
54
The decision management processes affect overall corporate performance, including its impact on customers and competitors. Decision management systems are a key performance component of every financial services organization, as they help the organization define, avoid and hedge financial risk.
Many large organizations, particularly in the financial services market, must comply with complex regulations. They operate in highly competitive markets that require quick responses. Business logic drives most of the financial services transactions and is the backbone of an organization’s policies and strategies, and its ability to successfully operate.
To achieve efficiency, business owners must assume ownership of the business logic and possess the ability to define, modify, standardize and reuse it across the organization. Business logic is defined today by business owners and compliance officers, but IT departments translate the requirements into code. This process raises several key challenges: 1) the result does not always accurately reflect the business requirements; 2) the new requirements might conflict with, or override, previous requirements; 3) the changes can take a long time and, 4) the entire process is not fully audited. These gaps often create an inefficient and risk-exposed organization. Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report, Sapiens is not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for the period from January 1, 2024 to March 27, 2025, the date Sapiens filed its Annual Report on Form 20-F, that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on its revenue, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that caused the disclosed financial information to be not necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial condition.
Sapiens’ Market Drivers
Large insurance and financial organizations must constantly invest in their IT systems to respond to key market drivers. They require the ability to:
| ● | Satisfy today’s sophisticated, tech-savvy and demanding end-customers – who demand the type of instant, personalized service they enjoy from Netflix or Amazon – via digitalization and innovative initiatives, providing a stronger customer experience and engagement. |
| ● | Facilitate, improve and automate traditional insurance processes to make them easier for end-customers, by utilizing advanced technologies, such as digital engagement, mobile, artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning, and cloud computing. |
| ● | Provide innovative business models, based on technology capabilities and digital operation (such as portals, web-based acquisition processes, advanced analytics, customer engagement platforms and data sources – including wearables, the Internet of Things and robo-advice). |
| ● | Respond to complex and evolving regulatory standards (past and current standards include Solvency II, IFRS 17, Dodd-Frank legislation, GDPR, DORA, etc.) |
| ● | Support internal customers’ growth and operations. This includes reducing the time to market of new products, expanding into new geographies, reducing costs and streamlining operations. |
| ● |
Rapidly launch new products and propositions to the market, within a short timeframe and using existing, pre-defined capabilities. |
55
| ● |
Improve operational efficiency and focus on reducing operating costs and improving the total cost of ownership, focusing on automation, AI and data-driven processes to achieve that.
| |
| ● | Improve risk assessment and risk scoring, in order to get better underwriting results and improved loss ratio and business outcomes. |
Sapiens’ Market Requirements
As a result of the above, we believe the following are key considerations for insurance carriers that are considering upgrading their legacy systems:
| ● | Dynamic business environment with constantly changing regulations – insurance carriers still use outdated legacy systems that are costly and time-consuming to modify or upgrade. This has prevented them from innovating and growing. Carriers who use legacy systems may find it difficult to modify existing products, introduce new products and reach untapped market segments. Frequently changing global regulatory requirements necessitate specialized data and business rules, which makes change implementation particularly challenging. |
| ● | Change in end-consumers’ preferences and the shift of power to consumers – insurance carriers must rapidly adapt to the shifting needs and behaviors of consumers and distributors, including the types and terms of insurance products offered, and how consumers access information. Insurance providers require systems with integration capability and support for multi-channel distribution, so they can reach their clients’ customers and partners using multiple methods, including social media, across devices. |
| ● | A need to improve operational efficiency and reduce total cost of ownership – Sapiens believes that a significant percentage of insurance carriers are still using inefficient and outdated processes which lack automation of operations and workflows, and thus do not offer efficient process management. Many of these processes likely have high error rates. Additionally, the ongoing maintenance of legacy systems is expensive and technically difficult. A specialized IT staff with the requisite skills and experience needed to maintain these systems is difficult to find and then eventually replace. Insurers seek systems that are modern, digital, cloud-based, automated, efficient and easy to maintain, and can lower costs over the long term. AI and ML are critical factors in this domain. |
| ● | Increasing global and multi-national operation – a rising number of insurers are accelerating their growth initiatives through global acquisitions. These insurers seek a single provider who can deliver solutions that will be used across markets, combining the support of local regulatory requirements and specific customer needs, while driving a generic corporate business approach and strategy across the globe, reducing costs and overhead. |
| ● | Exploring new business models and innovative propositions – carriers are increasingly looking to: join innovative ecosystems; adopt and use new technologies, and partner with insurtechs; bring modern and differentiating propositions to the market; reduce cost; enhance and speed customer engagement; and improve their business parameters and KPIs. |
| ● | Going digital and shifting to Cloud and SaaS Models– digitalization holds significant potential for insurers, but only if they manage to efficiently digitalize their operations, support multi-channel distribution and ensure that agents and customers are able to access real-time, accurate data at any time and from anywhere – across devices. The same is true for Cloud transition, where more insurers are moving their IT systems to be managed in the Cloud. |
| ● | Business growth in competitive environment - The need to demonstrate and achieve business growth in a very competitive environment, driving the need for strong innovative software solutions to better engage with channels and distribution, customer service. |
56
Business Decision Management Market Needs
Many large organizations, particularly in the financial services market, must comply with complex regulations. They operate in highly competitive markets that require quick responses. Business logic drives most of the financial services transactions and is the backbone of an organization’s policies and strategies, and its ability to successfully operate.
To achieve efficiency, business owners must assume ownership of the business logic and possess the ability to define, modify, standardize and reuse it across the organization. Business logic is defined today by business owners and compliance officers, but IT departments translate the requirements into code. This process raises several key challenges: 1) the result does not always accurately reflect the business requirements; 2) the new requirements might conflict with, or override, previous requirements; 3) the changes can take a long time and, 4) the entire process is not fully audited. These gaps often create an inefficient and risk-exposed organization.
Sapiens’ Software Offerings
Sapiens’ offerings not only enable its customers to effectively manage their core business functions – including policy administration, claims and billing – they support insurers on their path to digital transformation. Sapiens’ portfolio also provides a variety of complimentary solutions for critical requirements such as reinsurance management, underwriting management, illustration software, electronic applications and financial compliance tools. The latest versions of Sapiens’ platforms possess modern, modular cloud-first architecture and are digital-driven, providing full coverage for all business aspects of policy management, digital engagement and data analysis. They empower customers to respond to the rapidly changing insurance market and frequent regulatory changes, while improving the efficiency of their core operations. These enhancements increase revenue and reduce costs.
Sapiens provides a comprehensive digital & analytics suite, which is pre-integrated in Sapiens’ core solutions, across P&C, L&A and WC business, but also available stand-alone to insurers whether they utilize our core solutions or not. Sapiens DigitalSuite provides a strong customer engagement and experience capabilities through a wide range of connectivity tools such as portals, chatbots, live-chats and low-code/no-code digital business processes builders, are allowing insurance companies to rapidly go to mart with new propositions, and to manage a data-driven operation.
All those capabilities, across both business and core processing and across data & analytics, digital engagement, AI & ML use cases and cloud management together form the unified holistic Sapiens Insurance Platform, which Sapiens continues to develop, and which brings a fully integrated yet loosely coupled, SaaS-based insurance platform, managing the full lifecycle of any insurance business.
Sapiens offers its insurance customers a range of packaged software solutions that are:
| ● | Digital-led – revealing their history and anticipating their future needs, while facilitating easy engagement across preferred interaction channels and multiple devices. | |
| ● | SaaS and Cloud-based - Sapiens’ solutions are running and deployed in public clouds of the leading global cloud vendors, providing our customers with the inherent benefits of a modern SaaS application. |
| ● | Data-driven with increasing emphasis on Decision Management, ML, AI and GenAI – based on a set of data analysis tools, from data-warehouse and reporting, through business intelligence and analytics, to predictive and advanced analytics based on machine learning (ML) – so Sapiens’ customers can become a data-driven operation. Sapiens leverages the strong Microsoft partnership to achieve progress around the new Generative AI capabilities. |
57
| ● | Highly automated – by using various technologies, from decision to robotics, we improve efficiency and offer agile customer engagement. |
| ● | Comprehensive and proven– support for insurance standards, regulations and processes, by providing field-proven functionality and best practices. |
| ● | Configurable and rich functionality–easily matches our customers’ specific business requirements. Our flexible architecture and configurable structure allow quick functionality augmentation that permits our platform to be used across different markets, unique business requirements and regulatory regimes. We utilize our knowledge and extensive insurance best practices and feature business-led configuration, thus enabling a rapid adaptation of our solutions using smart configuration tools and no-code/low-code approach. |
| ● | Open architecture and insurtech ecosystem – provides easy integration to any external application under any technology, allowing streamlined connectivity to all satellite applications. This enhances the digital experience and omni-channel distribution, while maintaining total platform independence and system reliability. Easy interaction with various insurtech companies providing point-solutions that can be consumed by our platforms is enabled. |
| ● | Component-based and scalable – allows our customers to deploy platforms and solutions in a phased and modular approach, reducing risk and harm to the business, while supporting the growth plans and cost efficiency of the organization. |
Sapiens’ solutions enable:
| ● | Rapid deployment of new insurance products – via configurable software and using pre-defined templates, which create a competitive advantage in all the insurance markets we serve. |
| ● | Improvement of operational efficiency and reduction of risk – full insurance process automation, with configurable workflows, audit and control, streamlined insurance practices, and simple integration and maintenance. |
| ● | Reduction of overhead for IT maintenance – easy-to-integrate and simple-to-configure solutions with flexible and modern architecture, resulting in lower costs for ongoing maintenance, modifications, additions and integration. |
| ● | Enhanced omni-channel distribution, communication and focus on the customers – event-driven architecture, a proactive client management approach, rapid access to all levels of data, and a holistic view of clients and distributors. |
| ● | Cloud-first as a preferred deployment model – with the flexibility to also provide an on-premises deployment. |
| ● | Support for digitalization –insurers and financial services institutions who manage to efficiently digitalize their operations, support omni-channel distribution and ensure that agents and customers are able to access real-time, accurate data at any time and from anywhere – including tablets and mobile devices – will unlock massive potential. |
| ● | Cloud services – offering our customers access to a long-term engagement by providing comprehensive support for their daily IT operations, while allowing them to focus on their business KPIs. |
58
Sapiens Property & Casualty Solutions
Sapiens Platform for Property & Casualty
The Sapiens Insurance Platform for Property & Casualty is a future proof, AI-based open, modular and integrated insurance platform which accelerates adoption, delivers sustained value and empowers insurers to stay ahead. Sapiens Insurance Platform allows insurers to grow with a comprehensive but modular offering supporting end-to-end insurance processes across all lines of business.
Using AI-powered automation, Sapiens’ platform enables smart, data-driven business decisions and increased operational efficiency. The platform is purpose-built to help insurers evolve in the fast-paced world of digital insurance technology. The platform also includes innovative GenAI capabilities for supporting the users in operating on complex and lengthy documents and data pieces.
Sapiens Insurance Platform can be implemented as a pre-integrated platform, or in standalone modules. The platform addresses all P&C carrier needs across all lines of business and distribution channels, offering a wealth of digital features. It is comprised of core (policy, billing and claims), data (advanced analytics) and digital (a full suite) solutions.
The cloud-based Sapiens DigitalSuite offers an end-to-end, holistic and seamless digital experience for P&C customers, agents, brokers, customer groups and third-party service providers. The suite is pre-integrated with Sapiens’ P&C core and is comprised of digital engagement and digital enablement components.
Sapiens Suites for Property and Casualty are tailored by region: North America versus EMEA & Rest of World.
For the North American market
Sapiens CoreSuite for Property & Casualty
Sapiens CoreSuite for Property & Casualty is comprised of three fully integrated, core components that can also be deployed stand-alone: Sapiens PolicyPro, Sapiens BillingPro and Sapiens ClaimsPro. CoreSuite is pre-integrated with additional components that can be selected, including business intelligence, reinsurance and digital solutions, as well as various interfaces. This modular, automated, highly customizable suite offers a single platform for personal, commercial and specialty lines of business (LoBs). This increases organizational efficiency by reducing manual effort, generates competitive advantages and saves costs.
Sapiens PolicyPro
The Sapiens’ PolicyPro solutions for property & casualty come pre-integrated with the core system. They are easily integrated with existing and external systems and applications. The solutions manage the end-to-end policy administration lifecycle of an insurance contract, from initial quote, through rating and policy issuance. They also feature a complete range of policy issuance and amendment capabilities. Agents, underwriters and customers use the solutions to quote, issue and administer policies. The offerings provide comprehensive policy lifecycle support for all P&C lines of business.
Sapiens BillingPro
The Sapiens’ billing solution for P&C enables carriers, MGAs and brokers to manage the full lifecycle of premium services, taxes and fees, along with commission billing, collection and disbursements. P&C carriers can integrate with third-party systems and data repositories, enjoy best-in-class usability and automate processes throughout the billing lifecycle.
59
Sapiens ClaimsPro
Sapiens’ claims solutions for property & casualty provide simplified management and automated control of claims management handling and the settlement process. They offer intelligent, rules-driven workflow with effective claim assignment, ensuring faster cycle times, as well as rules-driven automatic claims payment.
EMEA and Rest of World
Sapiens IDITSuite for Non-life/General/Short Term Insurance
The Sapiens IDITSuite for Property & Casualty is a cloud-based, component-based, standalone software solution suite that offers policy, billing and claims and forms the core of the Sapiens Platform for Property & Casualty. IDITSuite supports all end-to-end core operations and processes for the non-life P&C market from inception to renewal and claims. This pre-integrated, fully digital suite offers customer and agent portals, business intelligence and more. IDITSuite enables insurers to expand their offerings by testing new lines of business, products and services using our flexible product factory.
The suite is modular and can integrate with your ecosystem’s components. Sapiens IDITSuite for Property & Casualty includes multiple lines of business in one policy for multiple insured objects and assets. It can support corporate agreements and master policy structures. IDITSuite is designed with growth and change in mind, with extensive multi-company, multi-branding, multi-country, multi-currency and multi-lingual capabilities. The IDITSuite management system is built on open technology and can be used across devices.
IDITSuite, and also in combination with Sapiens Digital and Data solutions, includes also advanced AI, ML and GenAI capabilities, bringing strong efficiency, speed op operation, ease of use and productivity to a set of users - both on the digital front and on the back-office users level.
Also available in different parts of the world:
Diana Solution for Property & Casualty (Spain)
The Diana solution for Property & Casualty tailored for the Iberian market, empowers insurance companies with a product engine, as well as policy, billing, claims and reinsurance capabilities. A fourth-generation solution Diana supports all core operations and processes for the P&C market, and supports bank assurance, brokers and direct insurance. The suite is modular, flexible and customizable through module workshops. Diana ecosystem is being enhanced through new features in micro services technology, like group policy management and injury agreements.
Fully digital SCIP Core (DACH)
SCIP CORE is a flexible, high-performance, cloud-capable and easily extensible inventory management platform. It offers all essential processes for efficient contract and claims processing and can be flexibly configured and extended in a few weeks. SCIP CORE digitally enables end customers, agents, claim handlers by using extensive self-services in different interfaces and portals.
Tia Enterprise (Nordics)
Tia Enterprise is a component-based, software solution suite that offers policy, billing and claims. Tia Enterprise can be hosted on-prem or in the cloud and can be extended through an API layer to incorporate ecosystem solutions as well as a digital communications and enablement layer and advanced analytics/BI. Tia Enterprise supports all end-to-end core operations and processes for the non-life market from inception to renewal and claims.
60
OASIS for MPL
OASIS is a fully integrated collection of components designed to embed core functionalities required in the MPL sector, including underwriting, policy management, claims management, financial management, BI and predictive analytics. The component-based platform delivers maximum out of the box functionality and stationing which ensures OASIS can easily integrate within a legacy environment.
Sapiens Life, Pension & Annuity Solutions
Sapiens Insurance Platform for Life, Pension & Annuities
The Sapiens Platform for Life, Pension & Annuities is A future-proof, AI-based, open, modular and integrated insurance platform, which accelerates adoption, delivers sustained value and empowers insurers to stay ahead. Sapiens Insurance Platform allows insurers to grow with a comprehensive but modular offering supporting end-to-end insurance processes across all lines of business.
Using AI-powered automation, Sapiens’ platform enables smart, data-driven business decisions and increased operational efficiency.
The platform is purpose-built to help insurers evolve in the fast-paced world of digital insurance technology, and includes Sapiens CoreSuite for Life, Pension & Annuities, a comprehensive, configurable, and unified underwriting, policy, billing, and claims software to accelerate insurance transformation across all life & annuities business lines; Sapiens DigitalSuite, a comprehensive, cloud-native, future-proof digital engagement suite specifically designed to enable, sustain, and grow insurance businesses, Sapiens DataSuite a data and analytics solution; In North America the platform also includes Sapiens IllustrationPro, Sapiens ApplicationPro, and Sapiens UnderwritingPro. With the ability to deploy its offerings as a complete platform, or as standalone modules, Sapiens can address life providers’ needs across all their lines of business and distribution channels. Our mature platform is cloud and API-based, and features a strong core, and advanced analytics, as well as data enablement and full digital engagement capabilities.
The platform also includes advanced AI, ML and GenAI capabilities, as well as using Decision management for streamlining straight-though-process activities, bringing strong efficiency, speed of operation, ease of use and productivity to a set of users - both on the digital front and on the back-office users level.
Sapiens CoreSuite for Life, Pension & Annuities
Sapiens CoreSuite for Life, Pension & Annuities is designed to provide excellence in the administration of insurance business, facilitate digital transformation and fast time-to-value for digital strategies, and create greater efficiency via legacy consolidation. It offers insurers:
| ● | A single platform for individual and group business and across protection, risk, savings and investment business. |
| ● | Transformation, enablement and execution for digital strategies supported by Cloud deployment. |
| ● | Greater efficiency via improved automation, user experience and system consolidation |
Sapiens CoreSuite for Life, Pension & Annuities suite supports the end-to-end administration of group and individual life, annuities, pension and investment business ‒ in a single system. The suite offers a 360-degree view of the customer from their policy administration system, across all distribution channels and communication streams.
Many insurers still use systems developed decades ago that cannot support today’s regulatory changes, digital marketplace and demanding customers. Too many manual processes can lead to errors that impact customer experience. Our unique conversion approach reduces the risks involved in migrating from existing legacy systems.
61
Complimentary modules are available in North America:
Sapiens UnderwritingPro for Life & Annuities
Sapiens UnderwritingPro for Life, Pension & Annuities is a web-based solution for automated underwriting and new business case management that is part of Sapiens’ solution set for life insurers. It speeds new business processes for insurance carriers and their channels, offering an intuitive user interface with critical updates and task assignments provided on a real-time dashboard. Sapiens UnderwritingPro enables underwriters and case managers to work on multiple cases simultaneously.
Sapiens ApplicationPro for Life & Annuities
Sapiens ApplicationPro for Life & Annuities is a digital insurance application software that helps carriers address critical business drivers, such as decreasing time-to-issue and reducing policy acquisition costs, all in an extremely intuitive and easy-to-use package. Carriers have a choice of a standalone eApplication system, or a more comprehensive solution that seamlessly integrates with Sapiens IllustrationPro for Life & Annuities and Sapiens UnderwritingPro for Life & Annuities .
Sapiens IllustrationPro for Life & Annuities
Sapiens IllustrationPro for Life & Annuities is a point-of-sale solution, offering responsive product illustrations from any device. ACORD®-compliant, it offers straight-through processing, from point-of-sale to application e-submission, supported by a needs analysis suite. IllustrationPro explains complex products in a compelling way. Its powerful calculation engines handle the most complex product illustrations, including the appropriate historical and hypothetical references.
Sapiens ConsolidationMaster for Life & Pension
Sapiens ConsolidationMaster is a purpose-built, end-to-end, legacy, portfolio-focused system with a unique migration methodology that deals with “dirty” data. The solution has a large variety of product templates capable of supporting the compliant administration of legacy products in any language and regulatory jurisdiction. ConsolidationMaster is designed to significantly cut the costs that are commonly associated with legacy platforms.
Sapiens DigitalSuite Solutions
Sapiens DigitalSuite offers an end-to-end, holistic and seamless digital experience for customers, agents, brokers, risk managers, customer groups and third-party service providers. The suite is pre-integrated with Sapiens’ core solutions. The DigitalSuite is also available stand-alone, and can be easily integrated with 3rd party core and ecosystem solutions through an advanced API layer. This facilitates digital transformation and fast time-to-value for digital strategies. It enables life carriers to become engaged, agile organizations with increased sales opportunities.
Sapiens DigitalSuite was designed to enable its carrier customers to deliver on the future of user and customer expectations. DigitalSuite is an offering that can react to market changes, support flexible interaction with dynamic APIs and offer a modern user experience. Sapiens DigitalSuite features component-based architecture, built on modern technologies and customer-centric design.
Sapiens DigitalSuite is comprised of innovative digital modules, which can be used together or stand-alone, and content libraries to facilitate diverse customer journeys, omnichannel communications and include rich portal content: Sapiens AgentConnect, EmployerConnect and CustomerConnect.
As an integral part of the solution, Sapiens provides strong ML and AI capabilities, especially around the agent/broker portals, to substantially enhance the way agents are executing their roles.
All digital offerings are entirely supported in the cloud.
62
Sapiens Digital API Layer and Conductor
This highly scalable layer facilitates an open-communication, API-based platform that enables carriers to interact with insurtech companies, ecosystem technology providers and business partners. By enabling seamless interaction with any service under any technology, Sapiens’ open architecture ensures that providers will easily choose the building blocks they need. They’ll be able to easily define new APIs on the fly and seamlessly integrate all elements within their insurance ecosystem, to succeed today and prepare for the future.
Sapiens Customer Journey and Form Builder
Features journey and form builders, journey analytics and deployment management capabilities – enables business users to easily create and maintain digital journeys, using a low-code/no-code approach. This component empowers insurers with agility and fast time to market, based on its “one click to deploy” functionality. Also available are full versioning capabilities and an extendable UI components library.
Sapiens AgentConnect,and CustomerConnect
Are dynamic portals built to deliver the optimal experiences expected by customers, brokers, agents, employers, alike, providing a high level of personalization to meet the diversified, individual needs of customers.
Sapiens BotConnect and LiveConnect
Sapiens brings conversational messaging to the next level, making it highly efficient in engaging customers. Sapiens BotConnect (AI-based chatbot) and LiveConnect (Omni-channel live chat) are designed to cultivate and enhance conversational messaging by ensuring perfect handoffs between different channels and personas, which translates into one unified customer-centric and smooth experience for both customers and the reps that cater to their needs. Together, this duo of components greatly improves the operational efficiency, providing a better service level to end-customers, based on their channel of choice.
Sapiens PartnerHub and Partner Ecosystem
Sapiens is a global organization with over three decades of extensive experience in insurance innovation and technology. Sapiens seek out and identify the most relevant, advanced and innovative technology solutions for the insurance market. Sapiens connect third-party technology and insurtech solutions to our Sapiens PartnerHub, from where we make their offerings available to insurers for their own use, and for the use of their customers.
DataSuite
Sapiens offers its analytics solutions, across both Life and P&C businesses, which include: insightful dashboards, reporting and apps; and predictive analytics which utilize AI and machine learning, generates actionable insights based on different models across the insurance value chain. By integrating with our advanced analytics solution and data warehouse, we can quickly generate actionable insights, self-service business intelligence and data discovery capabilities.
Sapiens Reinsurance Solutions
Sapiens reinsurance solutions are comprehensive business and accounting systems, providing a superior management for all types of reinsurance contracts – treaty and facultative, and proportional and non-proportional. It enables insurers of all sizes to manage their entire range of reinsurance contracts and activities for all lines of business, including rich accounting functionality and reporting capabilities.
63
Sapiens’ reinsurance solution enables full and flexible control of reinsurance processes, with built-in automation of contracts, calculations and processes. By incorporating fully automated functions adapted conveniently for your business procedures, Sapiens Reinsurance provides flexible and total financial control of your reinsurance processes, including complete support for all auditing requirements and statutory compliance.
The solutions are available in three flavors:
ReinsuranceMaster (in EMEA, APAC and for global insurers), ReinsurancePro (in N. America) which also produces schedule F automatically, and Reinsurance GO (N. America) which is designed to meet the ceded reinsurance processing needs of property & casualty providers, from calculating premium and claim cessions, to producing the data required for Schedule F.
Sapiens Workers’ Compensation Offerings
Sapiens Platform for Workers’ Compensation
Sapiens Platform for Workers’ Compensation includes the Sapiens CoreSuite for Workers’ Compensation, and comes pre-integrated with Sapiens DigitalSuite, including: Sapiens EmployerConnect a digital portal for employers and Sapiens Analytics and Data platform.’’
Sapiens CoreSuite for Workers’ Compensation
Sapiens CoreSuite for Workers’ Compensation offers larger carriers, administrators and state funds the technology solutions that enable them to adapt quickly to business and market conditions, offering high levels of accuracy and efficiency. The suite provides broad functionality throughout the entire insurance lifecycle for workers’ compensation, via a core suite, as well as policy, claims and intelligence modules that can be deployed individually, or as an integrated solution. This suite can be purchased as an integrated offering, or standalone components: Sapiens PolicyPro and Sapiens ClaimsPro.
Sapiens GO for Workers’ Compensation
Sapiens GO for Workers’ Compensation was developed specifically for carriers, managing general agents (MGAs), self-insurance funds and third-party administrators. Sapiens GO can deliver a turnkey solution in just 120 days. With its streamlined user interface and advanced business features, the suite addresses critical objectives. This suite can be purchased as an integrated offering, or standalone components: Sapiens PolicyGO and Sapiens ClaimsGO for Workers’ Compensation.
Sapiens Financial & Compliance Solutions
Sapiens’ set of financial & compliance solutions comprised of both annual statement and insurance accounting software includes:
| ● | Sapiens FinancialPro - accounting software designed for insurers to meet their unique requirements for cash, statutory and GAAP reporting, well as unique allocation and consolidation needs. It handles multi-basis accounting and inter-company transactions and facilitates the speed and accuracy of financial reporting. |
| ● | Sapiens Financial GO - offers small- and mid-sized insurers a solution for cash, statutory and GAAP reporting, as well as unique allocation and consolidation needs. Sapiens Financial GO manages and presents data to help insurance managers make informed decisions. |
| ● | Sapiens StatementPro - makes statement preparation faster and simpler by offering one-click navigation between statements, pages and form validations (cross-checks) to the pages they reference and offering one-step filing. |
| ● | Additionally, Sapiens offers Sapiens CheckPro and Sapiens reporting tools. |
64
Sapiens Business Decision Management Solutions
Sapiens Decision is a complete decision management platform that places software development in the hands of the business domain, creating “citizen developers,” and enforces business logic across all enterprise applications. Decision effectively addresses the complexity of determining and then translating business logic – data, business rules and machine learning used to make business decisions – into operational code. The business side of the organization can model, validate, test and simulate the business logic required for all new processes using Sapiens Decision. The process takes days or weeks, instead of months or years. A rigorous, structured approach ensures accuracy, efficiency and consistency during modeling. The models may then be automatically generated and deployed as code into automated DevOps environments, ensuring that the software is fully aligned with the organization’s business needs.
Sapiens has added strong AI and GenAI capabilities to the system, allowing for automated configuration of business rules via GenAI, ability to seamlessly embed ML cases into the decision logic, and Sapiens continues to invest in those features.
Sapiens is currently focusing on the development and marketing of Sapiens Decision in the insurance and financial services market in North America and Western Europe, and we are building best practices where the scale and complexity of operations requires enterprise-grade technology that can easily be adapted as policies and business strategies rapidly evolve. Sapiens developed and market Sapiens Decision for several verticals, including the insurance industry, and leverage our industry knowledge and close relationships with our existing customers and partners. Decision targets multiple markets:
Sapiens Decision for Financial Institutions (including Consumer & Commercial Banking, Investment Banking, & Mortgage Banking)
Tailored to meet the needs of Consumer & Commercial Banking, Investment Banking and Mortgage Banking institutions addresses the cost of change. It enables banks to efficiently adapt their operations to the demands of digital transformation, changing regulations, customer demands and increasing competition, using model-driven development (MDD). The MDD approach, enables businesspeople to define business logic in easily understood models. The process takes days or weeks, instead of months or years. It enforces business logic across all enterprise applications.
Sapiens Decision for Insurance
Sapiens Decision for Insurance enables insurers to efficiently adapt their business operations to the demands of digital transformation, changing regulations, customer demands and increasing competition. It is currently used by a top-tier, P&C insurance company to implement process automation and effect digital transformation.
Sapiens Decision for Government
Sapiens Decision for Government provides the capability to automate manual processes, alleviates gaps coming from different roles and interpretations, and creates fully validated policy artifacts in a format that other roles in the organization can understand.
Sapiens Technology-Based Solutions
Sapiens eMerge
Sapiens eMerge is a rules-based, model-driven architecture that enables the creation of tailor-made, mission-critical core enterprise applications with little or no coding. Our technology is intended to allow customers to meet complex and unique requirements using a robust development platform. For example, we perform proxy porting for our customers in an efficient, cost effective manner with Sapiens eMerge.
65
Sapiens Services
Sapiens’ services modernize and automate processes for insurance providers and financial institutions around the globe, helping to create greater organizational efficiencies, reduce costs and provide a better end user experience. They can be divided into three main categories: program delivery, value added services and cloud services.
Sapiens has partnered with both Microsoft Azure and AWS to offer its solutions over private and public (single tenant) clouds. Sapiens’ cloud deployment includes full infrastructure for operations, plus the option of choosing cloud-related cloud services delivered by Sapiens’ experienced professional services team.
Sapiens delivery methodologies are typically based on Agile approach or a hybrid agile-waterfall approach that fits best some segments of our market. Sapiens also provides delivery tools and delivery performance indicators. Built on a solid foundation of insurance domain expertise, proven technology and a history of successful deployments, our organization assists clients in identifying and eliminating IT barriers to achieve business objectives.
Sapiens’ services modernize and automate processes for insurance providers and financial institutions around the globe, helping to create greater organizational efficiencies, reduce costs and provide a better end-user experience. Built on a solid foundation of insurance domain expertise, proven technology and a heritage of successful deployments, we assist clients in identifying and eliminating IT barriers to achieve business objectives.
Benefits include:
| ● | Project delivery experience – more than 35 years of field-proven project delivery of its core system solutions, based on best practices and accumulated experience. |
| ● | System integration – Sapiens helps its customers deploy modern solutions, while expertly integrating these solutions with their legacy environments that must be supported. |
| ● | Global presence – insurance and technology domain experts are located close to our customers to provide professional services. |
Sapiens’ implementation teams assist customers in building implementation plans, integrating Sapiens software solutions with their existing systems, and deploying specific requirements unique to each customer and installation. Sapiens’ business services include API integration management and business intelligence (BI) and advanced analytics consolidation. Sapiens’ cloud services offer ongoing production support and a 24/7 help desk.
Sapiens’ service teams possess strong technology skills and industry expertise. The level of service and business understanding they provide contributes to the long-term success of our customers. This helps Sapiens develop strategic relationships with Sapiens’ customers, enhances information exchange and deepens our understanding of the needs of companies within the industry.
Through Sapiens’ service teams, Sapiens provides a wide scope of services and consultancy around Sapiens’ solutions, both in the initial project implementation stage, as well as ongoing additional services. Many of Sapiens’ customers also use Sapiens’ services and expertise to assist them with various aspects of daily maintenance, ongoing system administration and the addition of new solution enhancements.
Sapiens sometimes partners with several system integration and consulting firms to achieve scalable, cost-effective implementations for our customers. Sapiens has developed an efficient, repeatable methodology that is closely aligned with the unique capabilities of our solutions.
66
The services offered by Sapiens (and its partners’) teams include:
| ● | Adding new lines of business and functional coverage to existing solutions running in production. |
| ● | Ongoing support services for managing and administering the solutions. |
| ● | Creating new functionalities, per specific requirements of our customers. |
| ● | Assisting with compliance for new regulations and legal requirements. |
In addition, many of Sapiens’ clients choose to enter into an ongoing maintenance and support contract with Sapiens. The terms of such a contract are usually twelve months and are renewed every year. A maintenance contract entitles the customer to technology upgrades (when made generally available) and technical support. Sapiens also offers introductory and advanced classes and training programs available at our offices and customer sites.
Some of Sapiens’ offerings include:
Program delivery includes:
| ● | Project and program management - Overall program planning, governance, PMO services and risk management |
| ● | Training - Training needs analysis and consulting, train-the-trainer, user training, and application configuration training. |
| ● | Testing - Test strategy consulting, design and planning, SIT / Functional UAT / Business UAT, migration testing, performance / scalability and load testing, security testing and testing automation. |
| ● | Migration consulting- Migration strategy consulting and planning, data extract and load, data cleansing and data reconciliation. | |
| ● | Development, implementation and integration - Technical Solution Architecture, Analysis and Design, Development and Configuration, core system integration and project management. |
Value added services are comprised of:
| ● | User acceptance testing (UAT) - is different than system testing. UAT is a complementary stage which focuses on business processes, user’s journeys, and acceptance criteria as outlined in the specifications. |
| ● | Migration Services – full ownership of the migration of systems from one system to another. |
| ● | Analytics Services – let Sapiens’ experts help you build predictive models which are aligned and integrated into your insurance practices. |
Cloud services include:
| ● | Hosting Infrastructure Services: Virtual machines selection based on the applications architecture and performance requirement to ensure a value-for-money approach. Cloud services including, among others, network, business continuity and security. |
| ● | Hosting IT Services: continuous services that obviate the need for local IT involvement to maintain the infrastructure and includes: Operation Control Center (OCC) as a service, Security Operation Center (SOC) as a Service, Backup as a service, DBA as a service, DevOps as a service, and Disaster Recovery (DR) as a service. |
67
| ● | Applications Cloud Services: extends the standard maintenance agreement to provide additional services for Sapiens’ solutions based on specific customer needs, and may include any of the following: Extended maintenance and support - Customer layer/components defect handling and extended SLA, Application changes – setup / config / workflow / templates, Application operation – batches / release deployment / performance monitoring, Sapiens+ – support for non-Sapiens products (optional). |
Sapiens’ Competitive Landscape
Sapiens is focused on serving insurers. The market for core software solutions for the insurance industry is highly competitive and characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards and customer requirements, and frequent innovation. In addition, we offer a business decision management platform, mainly to financial services organizations.
Competitive Landscape for Sapiens’ Insurance Software Solutions
Sapiens’ competitors in the insurance software solutions market differ from us based on size, geography and lines of business. Some of our competitors offer a full suite, while others offer only one module; some operate in specific (domestic) geographies, while others operate on a global basis. And delivery models vary, with some competitors keeping delivery in-house, using IT outsourcing (ITO), or business process outsourcing (BPO).
The insurance software solutions market is highly competitive and demanding. Maintaining a leading position is challenging because it requires:
| ● | Development of new core insurance solutions, which necessitates a heavy R&D investment and in-depth knowledge of complex insurance environments |
| ● | Technology innovation to attract new customers, with rapid, technology-driven changes in the insurance business model and new propositions coming |
| ● | A global presence and the ability to support global insurance operations |
| ● | Ability to manage multiple partnerships, due to the changing landscape of insurers’ ecosystems |
| ● | Extensive knowledge of regulatory requirements and how to fulfill them (they can be burdensome and require specific IT solutions) |
| ● | Continued support and development of the solutions entails a critical mass of customers that support an ongoing R&D investment |
| ● | Know-how of insurance system requirements and an ability to bridge between new systems and legacy technologies |
| ● | Enabling mission-critical operations that require experience, domain expertise and proven delivery capabilities to ensure success |
The complex requirements of this market create a high barrier to entry for new players. As for existing players, these requirements have led to a marked increase in M&A transactions in the insurance software solutions sector, since small, local vendors have not been able to sustain growth without continuing to fund their R&D departments and following the globalization trend of their customers.
68
Sapiens believes that it is well-positioned to leverage its modern solutions, customer base and global presence to compete in this market and meet its challenges. In addition, our accumulated experience and expert teams allow us to provide a comprehensive response to the IT challenges of this market.
Different types of competitors include:
| ● | Global software providers with their own IP |
| ● | Local/domestic software vendors with their own IP, operating in a designated geographic market and/or within a designated segment of the insurance industry |
| ● | BPO providers who offer end-to-end outsourcing of insurance carriers’ business, including core software administration (although BPO providers want to buy comprehensive software platforms to serve as part of the BPO proposition from vendors and may seek to purchase Sapiens solutions for this purpose) |
| ● | Internal IT departments, who often prefer to develop solutions in-house |
| ● | New insurtech companies with niche solutions |
Sapiens differentiates itself from its competitors via the following key factors:
| ● | Sapiens offers cloud-based innovative and modern software solutions, with rich functionality and advanced, intuitive user interfaces, based on deep domain expertise and insurance know how |
| ● | Sapiens uses model-driven architecture that allows rapid deployment of the system, while reducing total cost of ownership and benefiting from cloud deployment. | |
| ● | Sapiens’ solutions are built using an architecture that allows customers to implement the full solution or components, and readily integrate the solution or individual components into their existing IT landscape |
| ● | Strong and global partnership program, with established IT players and new insurtech companies, to ensure linkage to innovative technologies and new business models, as well as ongoing work to embed innovation into Sapiens’ platforms |
| ● | Sapiens identifies technology trends and invest in adjusting our solutions to keep pace with today’s frenetic evolutions |
| ● | Sapiens financial stability, and its large and growing global customer base, enables it to fund R&D investment and maintain the competitive advantage of its products. Sapiens is able to fund R&D investment and maintain the competitive advantage of its products, due to its large and growing customer base and financial stability |
| ● | Sapiens delivery methodology is based on extensive insurance industry experience and cooperation with large insurance companies globally. Sapiens track record over the past few years in developing a strong offshore development center is also a significant parameter in differentiating our abilities in the services space |
Sapiens leverages its proven track record of successful delivery to help its customers deploy modern solutions, while integrating with their legacy environment (when that legacy environment must remain supported).
69
Competitive Landscape for Business Decision Management Solutions
Sapiens Decision is a pioneer in this disruptive market landscape. Since the introduction of its innovative approach to enterprise architecture to the market, it has identified only a small number of potential competitors.
Sapiens differentiates itself from its potential competitors through the following key factors:
| ● | Sapiens believes that Sapiens Decision is the only solution (that is currently generally available and already in production) that offers a true separation of the business logic in a decision management system for large enterprises |
| ● | Sapiens Decision is unique in its proven ability to support complex environments, with a full audit trail and governance that is crucial for large financial services organizations |
| ● | Sapiens understands complex environments where Decision is deployed, due to its experience delivering complex, mission-critical solutions |
Sapiens Sales and Marketing
Sapiens’ main sales channel is direct sales, with a small portion of partner sales. Sapiens’ sales team is spread across its regional offices in North America, the United Kingdom, Israel, India, Poland, the Nordics, Spain, Singapore, South Africa, Canada, Latvia and Germany. The direct sales force is geared to large organizations within the insurance and financial services industry.
Sapiens believes that its sales teams are sufficiently large to service its target regions – North America, the UK, Europe, APAC, EMEA and South Africa – and to execute sales, while also being assisted by our presales, domain experts and marketing teams. We anticipate that Sapiens’ sales team will leverage its proximity to customers and prospective clients to drive more business, and offer its services across its target markets.
Sapiens’ customer success and account management teams were focused on building ongoing relationships with existing customers during the past year, to maintain a high level of customer satisfaction and identify cross-selling and up-selling opportunities within these organizations. Sapiens believes that a high level of post-contract customer support is important to its continued success and also brings high value to its customers.
As part of its sales strategy, starting in 2024, Sapiens sells a full SaaS Platform package that includes a Sass subscription with license, and upgrades, cloud services, project implementation, product extensions and integration services, and training services. Sapiens aims to expand its distribution model to include more channel partners and system integrators, but it intends to maintain the direct sales model as its prime distribution channel.
Sapiens attends major industry trade shows (both physical and virtual) to improve its visibility and its market recognition. Additionally, Sapiens hosts client conferences– such as its annual Sapiens Summit/Client Conference, . In 2024 Sapiens hosted its North America Summit in Austin Texas. In 2025, Sapiens plans to host two conferences, and International Client conference in Vienna, Austria, and its Annual North America summit in Phoenix, AZ. Sapiens continues investing in its web presence and digital marketing activities to generate leads and enhance our brand recognition. Sapiens maintains a blog channel, podcast and a Vlog, and also invests in its working relationships and advisory services within the global industry-analyst community.
Sapiens works together with standards providers– such as ACORD– to further enrich its offerings and provide its customers with comprehensive and innovative solutions that address the entire breadth of their business needs.
70
Magic Software
Magic Software is a global provider of: (i) software services and Information Technologies (“IT”) outsourcing software services; (ii) proprietary application development and business process integration platforms; (iii) selected packaged vertical software solutions; as well as (iv) cloud-based services for end to end digital transformation.
Magic Software’s software technology is used by customers to develop, deploy and integrate on-premise, mobile and cloud-based business applications quickly and cost effectively. In addition, its technology enables enterprises to accelerate the process of delivering business solutions that meet current and future needs and allow customers to dramatically improve their business performance and return on investment. Magic Software also provides selected verticals with a complete software solution and return on investment.
As part of its software services and IT outsourcing services, Magic Software offers to hundreds of its customers mainly in Israel and in North America an extensive portfolio of professional services in the areas of infrastructure design and delivery, application development, technology consulting planning and implementation services, integration projects, project management, software testing and quality assurance, engineering consulting (including supervision of engineering projects), support services, cloud, cyber, digital, data and DevOps, all according to the specific needs of the customer, and in accordance with the professional expertise required in each case with the goal to create significant value for our clients in managing, streamlining, accelerating and helping their businesses thrive.
Based on its technological capabilities and its specialists, Magic Software enables its clients to respond to rapidly evolving market needs and regulatory changes, while improving the efficiency of their core operations. Magic Software has approximately 3,787 employees, who serve its clients at any given time and whose skills and specialization are a significant source of competitive differentiation. Magic Software operates through a large network of independent software vendors, or ISVs, who we refer to as Magic Software Providers, or MSPs, and hundreds of system integrators, distributors, resellers, and consulting and OEM partners. Thousands of enterprises in approximately 50 countries use Magic Software’s products and services.
Magic Software’s Software Technology Platforms
Organizations across all industries are digitally transforming by leveraging software to automate and optimize mission critical business processes, enhance customer experiences, and drive competitive differentiation. Historically, organizations have principally relied on off-the-shelf packaged software and custom software solutions to operationalize and automate their businesses. Packaged software often fails to address unique use cases or to enable differentiation. It also requires organizations to adapt their business (processes, systems of record, etc.) to the software package, as opposed to adapting the software to their unique business needs. While traditional custom software solutions can be differentiated and tailored to meet strategic objectives, development requires a long, iterative, and cumbersome process, as well as costly integration that relies on scarce developer talent. Through its unified platform Magic Software enables organizations to differentiate themselves from their competition using a low-code approach, creating applications and workflows tailored to their unique business requirements.
Throughout our history, we have traditionally maintained two major lines of products, one is our application development platform, which today is known as Magic xpa Application Platform, an evolution of our original metadata-based development platform; and the second is our application integration platform, Magic xpi Integration Platform, originally introduced in 2003 under the name iBOLT. In December 2011, we acquired the AppBuilder development platform of BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd., a leading provider of value-driven legacy IT modernization solutions. AppBuilder is a comprehensive application development infrastructure used by many Fortune 1000 enterprises around the world. This enterprise application development environment is a powerful, model-driven tool that enables development teams to build, deploy, and maintain large-scale, custom-built business applications. In April 2019, we acquired the SmartUX development platform of PowWow Inc., a leading Low-Code enterprise mobile development application platform for citizen to professional developers to rapidly design, build, analyze, and run cross-platform mobile business applications.
71
Magic Software’s low-code platforms employ an intuitive, visual interface and pre-built development modules that reduce the time required to build powerful and unique business applications and workflows. It is unified, reduces training times and dependencies on additional tools, and is built for enterprise-grade applications requiring high reliability, security, and scalability. Magic Software’s platform automates the creation of forms, workflows, data structures, reports, user interfaces, and other software elements that would otherwise need to be manually coded. This functionality greatly reduces the iterative development process, allowing for real-time optimization and ultimately shortening the time it takes to design, build, and deploy applications.
Our customers leverage our technologies to apply the right automation approach for their specific use case. We believe our unified low-code platforms are a differentiator in the marketplace. We strive to deeply integrate our capabilities so that they are all interoperable and low-code making it easier and faster for our clients to address complex use cases, particularly those that involve multiple departments within an organization.
Magic Software’s software technology platforms consist of:
| o | Magic xpa Application Platform – a proprietary low-code application platform for developing and deploying Client Server/Mobile/Web business applications. |
| o | AppBuilder Application Platform – a proprietary low-code application platform for building, deploying, and maintaining high-end, mainframe-grade business applications. |
| o | Magic xpi Integration Platform – a proprietary low-code platform for application integration |
| o | Magic xpi cloud native –an environment configurations platform based on Kubernetes focuses on scalability, security and resilience. |
| o | Magic SmartUX – a proprietary low-code enterprise mobile development application platform for citizen to professional developers to rapidly design, build, analyze, and run cross-platform mobile business applications. |
| o | FactoryEye – a cloud-based platform pre-packaged but flexible end-to-end data management for manufacturers enabling smooth migration to Industry 4.0 smart factories. Real-time factory floor visibility and optimization is provided as part of the end-to-end visibility to maximize production performance. |
|
|
o | Magic Data Management and Analytics Platform – a cloud-based pre-packaged but flexible end-to-end data management platform for all verticals enabling smooth digital transformation and full organizational business intelligence |
Magic Software’s Vertical Software Packages
Magic Software’s vertical packaged software solutions include:
| o | Clicks™ – offered by its Roshtov subsidiary, Clicks is a proprietary comprehensive core software solution for medical record information management systems, used in the design and management of patient-file for managed care and large-scale healthcare providers. The platform is connected to each provider clinical, administrative and financial data base system, residing at the provider’s central computer, and allows immediate analysis of complex data with potentially real-time feedback to meet the specific needs of physicians, nurses, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, front- and back-office professionals and consumers. |
72
| o | Hermes Cargo – Hermes Air Cargo Management System and Hub Management System is a proprietary, state-of-the-art, cloud-first event driven software solution for managing air cargo ground handling. The Hermes SaaS, offered as a complete Managed Service, includes Hermes Cloud CMS and HMS, Hermes Business Intelligence (BI) and Data Lakes, Hermes Landside Management, Hermes Track & Trace, Hermes Learning Management System, and Hermes Integration APIs, providing lower entry costs and a pay-as-you-go offering for its customers, as well as pushing customers’ digital credentials. The Hermes Solution covers all aspects of cargo handling, from physical handling and cargo documentation through customs, seamless EDI communications, dangerous goods and special handling, tracking and tracing, security and billing. Customers benefit through faster processing and more accurate billing, reporting and ultimately enhanced revenue. The system also features the Hermes Business Intelligence (HBI) solution, adding unprecedented data analysis capabilities and management-decision support tools. The Hermes Solution is delivered on a licensed or fully hosted basis. |
| o | HR Pulse – offered by its Pilat NAI, Inc. and Pilat Europe Ltd. subsidiaries, Pulse (now in its 10th release) is a proprietary tool for the creation of customizable HCM solutions quickly and affordably. It has been used by Pilat to create products, such as Pilat Frist and Pilat Professional, that provide “out of the box” SaaS solutions for organizations that implement Continuous Performance and/or Talent Management. |
| o | MBS Solution – offered by its Complete Business Solutions Ltd. subsidiary, MBS Solution is a proprietary comprehensive core system for managing TV broadcast channels. |
| o | Nativ – offered by its Menarva Ltd. subsidiary, Nativ is a proprietary comprehensive core system for management of rehabilitation centers. | |
| o | Mobisale – offered by its Mobisoft Ltd. subsidiary, Mobisale is a proprietary comprehensive core system for sales and distribution field activities for consumer goods manufacturers and wholesalers. |
Magic Software’s Professional Software and IT Services
Magic Software’s global software professional services offerings include a vast portfolio of professional services and IT outsourcing services in the areas of infrastructure design and delivery, application development, technology consulting planning and implementation services, support services, digital, DevOps (Development& Operations), Mobile, Open source, embedded systems and IoT devices, advanced algorithms for AI, Big Data and Analytical BI, M/F, security & cyber, cloud computing for deployment of highly available and massively-scalable applications and APIs and supplemental IT outsourcing services to a wide variety of companies, including Fortune 1000 companies, all in accordance with the professional expertise required, in each case allowing us to create significant value for our clients in managing, streamlining, accelerating and making their businesses thrive. The talents we provide generally supplement in-house capabilities of our customers. We have extensive and proven experience with virtually all types of telecom infrastructure technologies in wireless and wire-line as well as in the areas of infrastructure design and delivery, application development, project management, technology planning and implementation services.
Magic Software obtained substantial experience in end-to-end development of high-end software solutions, beginning with collection and analysis of system requirements, continuing with architecture specifications and setup, to software implementation, component integration and testing. It takes the time to truly learn its customers’ business goals and choose the most appropriate technologies, architecture and approaches for each project, so we can consistently provide effective and efficient solutions. Our research and development teams are at the technological forefront, constantly learning and developing. They work alongside experts from the widest range of fields and disciplines. From concept to implementation, from application of the ideas of startups requiring the early development of an application or a device, to somewhat larger, more established enterprises, vendors or system houses who need our team of experts to take full responsibility for the development of their systems and products. With our ability to draw on our pool of resources, comprised of hundreds of highly trained, skilled, educated and flexible engineers, we adhere to timelines and budget and work in full transparency with our customers every step of the way to create a tailor-made and cost-effective solution to answer all of our customers’ unique needs.
73
Magic Software IT services subsidiaries consist of:
| ● | Coretech Consulting Group LLC |
| ● | Fusion Solutions LLC |
| ● | Xsell Resources Inc. |
| ● | AllStates Consulting Services LLC |
| ● | Futurewave Systems, Inc. |
| ● | NetEffects, Inc. |
| ● | The GoodKind Group LLC. | |
| ● | CommIT Group |
| ● | Comblack IT Ltd |
| ● | Infinigy Solutions |
| ● | Shavit Software Ltd. |
| ● | OnTarget Group Inc |
| ● | Aptonet Inc |
| ● | Stockell information systems |
| ● | EnableIT LLC |
| ● | Appush Ltd (formerly Vidstart Ltd) | |
| ● | K.M.T. (M.H.) Technologies Communication Computer Ltd | |
| ● | Executive Life Ltd | |
| ● | Theoris Group Inc. |
Magic Software’s Partnerships and Alliances
Magic Software continues to build on its existing strategic partnerships that include partnerships with Oracle, JD Edwards, SAP, Salesforce.com, Microsoft, AWS, GCP, IBM and SugarCRM to enhance its mobile, integration and cloud offerings.
In May 2020, Magic Software’s subsidiary CommIT achieved AmazonAWS SaaS Competency status. AWS SaaS Competency is designated to help customers find top AWS consulting partners with deep specialization and experience in designing and building software-as-a-service solutions on AWS. Organizations are interested in software that is easy to use, implement, and operate. They are looking to reduce time-to-value and obtain access to innovative product features and flexible software procurement on a consumption or contractual basis. AWS SaaS Competency Partners follow Amazon Web Services (AWS) best practices for designing and building SaaS solutions through their professional services practices. To qualify for the AWS SaaS Competency designation, organizations have undergone rigorous technical validation by AWS Partner Solutions Architects and demonstrated proven customer success.
74
In November 2023, CommIT was awarded with AWS System Integrator Partner of the Year in Israel for 2023 in the field of integration, specialized services, and consulting (System Integrator). This award reflects Commit’s expertise and innovation in leveraging AWS technologies to deliver comprehensive and effective solutions for its clients. For the third time in four years, Commit has been honored by AWS, previously earning accolades as Partner of the Year in the Public Sector and Rising Star of the Year. Commit’s expertise plays a pivotal role in facilitating its clients’ seamless migration to the cloud, optimizing workloads, and implementing innovative strategies such as cost optimization. The proven capabilities of Commit’s cloud experts encompass architecture services, migration execution, modernization processes for existing systems, and the establishment of new cloud environments, with specialization in SaaS, IoT, Cyber, Big Data, AI that result in substantial cost savings and cutting-edge cloud applications and services development to its clients.
Building on that, in December 2024, Commit achieved a significant milestone: earning the AWS Generative AI Competency. This prestigious recognition underscores our leadership in delivering innovative AI solutions and highlights our commitment to helping businesses harness Generative AI to drive tangible, measurable outcome. As indicated by AWS, Commit maintains deep and broad technical expertise across various domains, is significantly ahead of most of the competition in advancing their generative AI solutions enabling the successful delivery of complex projects. The AWS Generative AI Competency is awarded to organizations that excel in designing, implementing, and scaling advanced AI applications on AWS. By earning this recognition, Commit has demonstrated the ability to empower businesses with AI-driven solutions that generate real value—whether by optimizing costs, accelerating time-to-market, or enhancing customer experiences. This competency enables Commit to help businesses deploy AI-powered solutions that are not only scalable but also cost-efficient. Leveraging AWS's flexible infrastructure, we reduce deployment times and operational overhead, helping organizations realize value faster. From improving process efficiency to enabling new revenue streams, our solutions are designed to maximize ROI at every stage.
Generative AI is reshaping industries, enabling businesses to solve problems faster and more efficiently. Commit’s expertise lies in turning this potential into actionable outcomes, such as automating workflows, enhancing decision-making through data insights, and improving customer engagement. With AWS tools like Amazon SageMaker, Bedrock, AmazonQ and AWSLambda, Commit builds tailored AI models that streamline operations and deliver measurable impact.
In April 2024, CommIT was awarded with Google Cloud Sales Partner of the Year in Israel for 2023. Building on this achievement, in 2025, Commit was named the Google Cloud EMEA Partner of the Year for Israel, marking a consecutive year of acknowledgment for its unwavering commitment to delivering transformative cloud solutions and consistently exceeding. This highly regarded awards were presented to Commit for its significant contribution to promoting unique innovation and building successful integrated solutions for its Google Cloud customers and recognize Commit’s contribution as a leading Google Cloud partner, demonstrating unique and outstanding positive results to Google Cloud’s partner and sales team. Commit’s win of this awards joins the previous recognition of four of Commit’s team members as “Google Cloud Partner All-Stars for 2023” in the Marketing, Sales, and Solutions Engineering classifications. Commit, is a Premier Partner for Google Cloud in the Sell Engagement Model, which provides services and technology solutions to Google Cloud customers. CommIT has recruited more than 100 new customers in Israel to Google Cloud over the past year alone. Over the years, and particularly over the past year, Commit has helped many customers move to Google Cloud, streamline cloud workloads, save cloud usage costs considerably, and develop new cloud-based apps and services. One of Commit’s specialties is assisting in the comprehensive integration of complex cases and maximizing the optimization of existing cloud capabilities using Google Cloud’s advanced generative AII capabilities.
75
In recent years, Commit has successfully led, developed and produced many SaaS solutions on AWS, Azure and GCP, for companies across many business sectors, including high-tech and startups, industrial and retail, and insurance and finance. CommIT concluded 2024 with 48% growth in cloud revenues and more than doubled the number of cloud experts it employs from 2022 to 2024, which amounts to over 200. Its unique, flexible R&D model, which provides complete flexibility in determining the mix of experts, allows for full control of budgets and schedules throughout the development project. In this framework, We accompany our clients in their digital journey and in their entry into the SaaS world, providing design and build services for application environments or migration services for applications from existing models to cloud SaaS models. These processes require software architecture, construction, and software development from both Digital and SaaS, all of which take into account performance aspects, information security, scalability, infrastructure monitoring, customer experience and billing. Achieving AWS SaaS Competency status allows us to expand our business offering and even accompany the organizational change for customers who are in the process of transitioning to SaaS.
Magic Software’s Industry Overview
In recent years, the number of available enterprise applications has grown significantly which has led information system complexity within many organizations to a level that has obstructed business progress and evolution, reduced business agility and led to significantly higher costs. We believe this complexity will continue to increase in the future. Although it is not unusual for organizations to operate multiple applications, systems and platforms that were created utilizing disparate programming languages, the complexity of these environments typically reduces an organization’s operating flexibility, hinders decision-making processes and leads to costly inefficiencies and redundancies. When organizations seek to swiftly change, update and upgrade IT assets to support new business processes or to cope with changes in business and regulatory environments, they often find that the introduction and integration of new or upgraded business applications is more complex than expected, requires significant implementation resources, takes a long time to implement and is costly. The proliferation of smartphones and mobile platforms necessitates device-independent and future-proof business solutions for fast, simple, and cost-effective mobile deployment. In addition, new cloud computing technologies present enterprises with an opportunity to realize greater agility and meaningful cost savings to businesses, creating a growing need for further changes to enterprises’ IT applications and systems.
The pace of digital transformation is also accelerating at companies all around the world. Customers are increasingly demanding an all-digital experience from the companies they do business with. They seek instant gratification through real-time updates or instant customer service without having to talk to or wait for other human beings. Employees are also pushing for a more digital experience in their workplaces. The confluence of these internal and external forces is causing companies of all sizes to put digital transformation goals at the top of the agenda. It is becoming clearer that companies will need to embrace and prioritize the creation of a digital operating environment to gain a competitive edge and be able to recruit and maintain a talented employee base.
Manual coding and application development is a complex and time-consuming process with an end result that is not guaranteed. The process requires constant iteration as bugs are discovered and new features are integrated. In addition, the communication gap and general disconnect between developers and end-users are critical shortcomings of manual coding that results in business applications that are less than ideally designed. Many of these problems can be addressed by low-code and no-code development platforms. The enterprise application development software market consists of several application development sub-segments and includes large dominant players such as IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, HP, CA Technologies and Compuware as well as a large number of highly specialized vendors, with focused capabilities for specific vertical markets. Huge backlogs of enterprise app development work and growing demand for apps coupled with shortage and expense of skilled programmers, is increasingly leading enterprises to turn to low-code/no-code application development platforms that democratize the development process and give business users the ability to develop applications themselves with minimal or no assistance from IT. Through the adoption of business applications, these business users are increasingly looking for ways to automate manual workflows and become more efficient and effective by reallocating their time to solving more complex business problems. Even IT resources and developers are using low-code development tools to increase their development speed and reduce backlog. a growing market for low-code/no-code development platforms.
76
Although the market for low-code development platforms is not new by any means, it has certainly started to gain more traction over the past couple of years and is expected to continue its strong growth due to continued demand for applications and a shortage of skilled developers. Low-code development is a natural evolution of rising abstraction levels in application development, which will eventually lead to viable cross-enterprise, highly scalable citizen development and composition of applications. According to Market analysts, low-code predictions, this market will experience explosive growth, with projections showing that over 70% of new applications will utilize low-code by 2025. This shift is driven by the urgent need for digital transformation and the increasing adoption of low-code solutions. As analysts highlight, embracing low-code technologies can dramatically accelerate your development and streamline operations. The low-code market is set to experience explosive growth in the coming years. This global market is projected to reach $44.5 billion by 2026, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 19%. This rapid expansion is largely driven by organizations’ increasing need to speed up their digital initiatives while controlling development costs and timelines. Web application is considered as a face of an organization and by using the low-code development platform organizations can roll out user-defined web-based applications quickly. Instead of writing the programming language for the development of web-based applications, employees with less development experience can also create sophisticated applications. For those who has relevant experience, this platform can ease out the daily work chores and can even help them create more custom web-based applications by integrating already existing digital ecosystems. North America has the presence of several prominent market players delivering low-code development platform and services to all end users in the region. The US and Canada both have strong economic conditions and are expected to be major contributors to the growth of the low-code development platform market. The geographical presence, significant research and development (R&D) activities, partnerships, and acquisitions and mergers are the major factors for the deployment of low-code development platform and services.
The IT services segment of the market is comprised of a broad array of specific segments such as infrastructure design and delivery, application development, technology consulting planning and implementation services, support services and supplemental outsourcing services. In addition, IT professional services include quality assurance, product engineering services and process consulting. The IT services segment is also undergoing a profound transition, with some key trends that have accelerated recently. Growing demand for mobile and cloud-based applications as well as Big Data solutions also entails more complex IT development and integration projects which management and implementation require a higher level of expertise, In addition, the typical software-based projects of IT consulting have been gradually shifting towards software and technology-driven solutions that can be embedded into clients’ systems, providing ongoing engagement services. This transition has been accentuated by an underlying change in IT services sourcing processes: the need for a faster go-to-market process as well as constrained resources in IT departments is resulting in greater influence by specific business units on the purchasing decision as opposed to the traditional sourcing process. The traditional outsourcing business model of capacity on demand is also transitioning towards a model of capability on demand. Information technology service buyers are increasingly looking at outcome-driven managed services with a tighter integration between software, service and infrastructure.
Magic Software has identified the following trends that are relevant to the markets it operates in:
| ● | Increasingly complex business integration: In recent years, enterprises operate multiple applications and platforms, using various programming languages, resulting in complex enterprise information systems. Such systems and the ability to swiftly change, update, and upgrade them to support new business processes are crucial to the enterprise’s ability to cope with changes in the business, economic and regulatory environment. However, the introduction and integration of new business applications is complex, requires significant time and human resources and entails significant and often unpredicted costs. Therefore, enterprises are in need of solutions that will facilitate the rapid and seamless deployment of business applications. |
| ● | Reusing IT assets/enterprise applications: In an increasingly dynamic technology, business and economic environment, organizations face mounting pressure to continue to leverage their large IT investments in enterprise applications, such as ERP and CRM, while increasing their ability to change business processes and support new ones. Tools to support lightweight yet rapid, iterative and modular development methodologies, reusable architectures and application life-cycle management are primary drivers for spending on application development worldwide. |
77
| ● | Enterprise mobility: With the proliferation of smartphones and mobile platforms that support enterprise mobility, enterprise users now expect instant access to real-time information, a rich user experience, seamless integration with various enterprise systems and support to multiple mobile devices. As such, enterprises need to be able to develop device-independent and robust business solutions for fast and cost-effective mobile deployment. |
| ● | Cloud, Platform-as-a-Service and Software-as-a-Service: Cloud, Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) are each becoming a well-established phenomenon in some areas of enterprise IT. Cloud-hosted applications continue to grow as alternatives to internally managed systems as they deliver greater agility and meaningful cost savings to businesses. In addition, fast time-to-deployment, low cost-of-entry, and adoption of pay-as-you-go models drive growing adoption of SaaS applications. In turn, SaaS applications enable the rapid construction, deployment and management of some custom-built applications accessed as a service in the cloud. With more SaaS deployments, the need for integration tools that bridge the cloud apps with on-premise application increases. |
| ● | Big Data: The amount of digital information that is being generated by enterprises each year, across a number of diverse data sources and formats, is growing rapidly. Enterprises are required to retain, process and analyze data to attain meaningful insights and gain competitive advantages, and therefore require versatile and flexible tools in order to quickly and reliably process these increasingly large amounts of data. |
| ● | IT Consulting: The typical software-based projects of IT consulting have been gradually shifting towards software and technology-driven solutions that can be embedded into clients’ systems, providing ongoing engagement services. |
| ● | Sourcing processes: The need for a faster go-to-market process as well as constrained resources in IT departments is resulting in greater influence by specific business units on the purchasing decision as opposed to the traditional sourcing process. The traditional outsourcing business model of capacity on demand is also transitioning towards a model of capability on demand. Information technology service buyers are increasingly looking at outcome-driven managed services with a tighter integration between software, service and infrastructure. |
| ● | Mobility & IT skills shortage: Growth in mobility skills demand is outpacing organizations’ ability to keep up, resulting in mobile strategists facing a skills shortage across the entire mobility ecosystem, with mobile application development skills in greatest demand. Poor availability of skilled staff is driving mobile strategists to outsource many functions across the mobility ecosystem, including application development and testing services. The increasing mobility skills gap will force mobile strategists to use a multifaceted application development and delivery approach. |
Magic Software’s Software Solutions
Magic Software’s software solutions enable enterprises to accelerate the planning, development, deployment and integration of on-premise, mobile and cloud business applications that can be rapidly customized to meet current and future needs. Its software solutions and complementary professional services empower customers to dramatically improve their business performance and return on investment by enabling the cost-effective and rapid delivery, integration and mobilization of business applications, systems and databases. Its technology and solutions are especially in demand when time-to-market considerations are critical, budgets are tight, and integration is required with multiple platforms or applications, databases or existing systems and business processes, as well as for RIA and SaaS applications. Its technology also provides the option to deploy our software capabilities in the cloud, hosted in a web services cloud computing environment. We believe these capabilities provide organizations with a faster deployment path and lower total cost of ownership. Magic Software’s technology also allows developers to stage multiple applications before going live in production.
78
Development communities are facing high complexity, cost and extended pay-back periods in order to deliver cloud, RIAs, mobile and SaaS applications. Magic xpa, AppBuilder, Magic SmartUX, Magic xpi, Magic FactoryEye, and Magic’s Data Management and Analytics platformall provide MSPs with the ability to rapidly build integrated applications in a more productive manner, deploy them in multiple modes and architectures as needed, lower IT maintenance costs and speed time-to-market. Magic Software’s solutions are comprehensive and industry proven. These technologies can be applied to the entire software development market, from the implementation of micro-vertical solutions, through tactical application modernization and process automation solutions, to enterprise spanning service-oriented architecture, or SOA, migrations and composite applications initiatives. Unlike most competing platforms, Magic Software offers a coherent and unified toolset based on the same proven metadata driven and rules-based declarative technology. Its low-code, metadata platforms consist of pre-compiled and pre-written technical and administrative functions, which are essentially ready-made business application coding that enables developers to bypass the intensive technical code-writing stage of application development and integration, concentrate on building the correct logic for their apps and move quickly and efficiently to deployment. Through the use of metadata-driven platforms such as Magic xpa, AppBuilder, Magic SmartUX, Magic xpi, Magic’s Data Management and Analytics platform and Magic FactoryEye, software vendors and enterprise customers can experience unprecedented cost savings through fast and easy implementation and reduced project risk.
Magic Software’s software technology solutions include application platforms for developing and deploying specialized and high-end large-scale business applications and integration platforms that allow the integration and interoperability of diverse solutions, applications and systems in a quick and efficient manner. These solutions enable our customers to improve their business performance and return on investment by supporting the affordable and rapid delivery and integration of business applications, systems and databases. Using our software solutions, enterprises and ISVs can accelerate time-to-market by rapidly building integrated solutions, deploying them in multiple environments while leveraging existing IT resources. In addition, our solutions are scalable and platform-agnostic, enabling our customers to build solutions by specifying their business logic requirements in a commonly used language rather than in computer code, and to benefit from seamless platform upgrades and cross-platform functionality without the need to re-write applications. Its technology also enables future-proof protection and supports current market trends such as the development of mobile applications that can be deployed on a variety of smartphones and tablets, and cloud environments. In addition, we also offer a variety of vertical-targeted products that are focused on the needs and requirements of specific growing markets. Certain of these products were developed utilizing our application development platform.
Magic Software sells its solutions globally through its own direct sales representatives and offices and through a broad sales distribution network, including independent country distributors, independent service vendors that use our technology to develop and sell solutions to their customers, and system integrators. Magic Software also offers software maintenance, support, training, and consulting services in connection with our products, thus aiding the successful implementation of projects and assuring successful operation of the platforms once installed. We sell our integration solutions to customers using specific popular software applications, such as SAP, Salesforce.com, IBM i (AS/400), Oracle JD Edwards, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Dynamics, SugarCRM and other eco-systems. As such, we enjoy a well-diversified client base across geographies and industries including oil & gas companies, telecommunications groups, financial institutions, healthcare providers, industrial companies, public institutions and international agencies.
The underlying principles and purpose of our technology are to provide:
| ● | Simplicity – the use of code-free/low code development tools instead of hard coding and multiple programming languages to solve critical and complex challenges; |
79
| ● | Business focus – the use of pre-compiled business logic and components eliminates repetitive, low level technical and coding tasks; |
| ● | Comprehensiveness – the use of a comprehensive development and deployment platform offers a full end-to-end development, deployment and integration capability; |
| ● | Automation of mundane tasks – to accelerate development and maintenance and reduce risk; and |
| ● | Interoperability – to support business logic across multiple hardware and software platforms, operating systems and geographies. |
Magic Software offers three complementary application platforms that address the wide spectrum of composite applications, Magic xpa, Magic SmartUX and AppBuilder. Our Magic xpi integration platform, Magic FactoryEye and Magic’s Data Management and Analytics platform deliver fast and simple integration and orchestration of business processes and applications. Our customers operate in a wide variety of industries, including financial services, life sciences, government, telecommunications, energy and manufacturing.
Magic xpa Application Platform
Magic xpa Application Platform, our metadata driven application platform, provides a simple and unified, low code and cost-effective development and deployment environment that lets organizations and MSPs quickly create user-friendly, enterprise-grade, multi-channel mobile and desktop business app that employ the latest advanced functionalities and technologies. The Magic xpa Application Platform, formerly named uniPaaS, was first released in 2008 and is an evolution of our original eDeveloper product, a graphical, rules-based and event-driven framework that offered a pre-compiled engine for database business tasks and a wide variety of generic runtime services and functions which was released in 2001.
Magic Software has continually enhanced its Magic xpa application platform to respond to major market trends such as the growing demand for cloud-based offerings including Rich Internet Applications (RIA), mobile applications and SaaS. Accordingly, we have added new functionalities and extensions to our application platform, with the objective of enabling the development of RIA, SaaS, mobile and cloud-enabled applications. SaaS is a business and technical model for delivering software applications, similar to a phone or cable TV model, in which the software applications are installed and hosted in dedicated data centers and users subscribe to these centers and use the applications over an internet connection. This model requires the ability to deliver RIA. Magic xpa is a comprehensive RIA platform. It uses a single development paradigm that handles all ends of the application development and deployment process including client and server partitioning and the inter-communicating layers.
Magic xpa offers customers the power to choose how they deploy their applications, whether full client or web; on-premise or on-demand; in the cloud or behind the corporate firewall; software or mobile or SaaS; global or local. Our Magic xpa Application Platform complies with event driven and service oriented architectural principles. By offering technology transparency, this product allows customers to focus on their business requirements rather than technological means. The Magic xpa single development paradigm significantly reduces the time and costs associated with the development and deployment of cloud-based applications, including RIAs, mobile and SaaS. In addition, application owners can leverage their initial investment when moving from full client mode to cloud mode, and modify these choices as the situation requires. Enterprises can use cloud-based Magic xpa applications in a SaaS model and still maintain their databases in the privacy of their own data centers. It also supports most hardware and operating system environments such as Windows, Unix, Linux and AS/400, as well as multiple databases and is interoperable with. NET and Java technologies.
80
Magic xpa can be applied to the full range of software development, from the implementation of micro-vertical solutions, through tactical application modernization and process automation solutions, to enterprise spanning SOA migrations and composite applications initiatives. Unlike most competing platforms, we offer a coherent and unified toolset based on the same proven metadata driven and rules based declarative technology, resulting in increased cost savings through fast and easy implementation and reduced project risk.
Magic xpa enables organizations to differentiate themselves from their competition through software-enabled digital transformation. With our platform, organizations can rapidly and easily design, build and implement powerful, enterprise-grade custom applications through our intuitive, visual interface, with little or no coding required. Our Solution ensures that applications developed on our platform can be immediately and natively deployed across a full range of mobile and desktop devices with no additional customization, including desktop web browsers, tablets and mobile phones. We also enable organizations to easily modify and enhance applications and automatically disseminate these updates across device types to ensure that all users benefit from the most up-to-date functionality.
Key benefits of our platform include:
| ● | Powerful applications to solve critical and complex challenges. At the core of our platform is an advanced engine that enables the modeling, modification and management of complex processes and business rules. Our heritage provides us with this differentiated understanding of complex processes, and we have incorporated that expertise into our platform to enable the development of powerful applications. Organizations have used our platform to launch new business lines, build large procurement systems, manage retail store layouts, conduct predictive maintenance on field equipment and manage trading platforms, among a range of other use cases. |
| ● | Rapid and simple innovation through our powerful platform. Our platform employs a low-code, intuitive, visual interface and pre-built development modules that reduce the time required to build powerful and unique applications. Our platform automates the creation of forms, data flows, records, reports and other software elements that would otherwise need to be manually coded or configured. This functionality greatly reduces the iterative development process, allowing for real-time application optimization and ultimately shortening the time from idea to deployment. In turn, organizations can better leverage scarce and costly developer talent to accomplish more digital transformation objectives. |
| ● | Build once, deploy everywhere. Our technology allows developers to build an application once and use it everywhere with the consistency of experience and optimal performance levels that users expect. Applications developed on our platform can be immediately and natively deployed across a full range of mobile and desktop devices with no additional customization, including desktop web browsers, tablets and mobile phones. We also enable organizations to easily modify and enhance applications and automatically disseminate these updates across device types to ensure all users benefit from the most up-to-date functionality. |
| ● | Deployment flexibility to serve customer needs. Our platform can be installed in any cloud or on-premises, with organizations able to access the same functionality and data sources in all cases. Our flexible deployment model also preserves a seamless path to future cloud deployments for organizations initially choosing on-premises for their most sensitive workloads. |
Magic Software’s approach to digital transformation goes beyond simply enabling organizations to build custom applications fast. It empowers decision makers to reimagine their products, services, processes and customer interactions with software by removing much of the complexity and many of the challenges associated with traditional approaches to software development. Because Magic Software makes application development easy, organizations can build specific and competitively differentiated functionality into applications to deliver enhanced user experiences and streamlined business operations.
81
AppBuilder Application Platform
AppBuilder, a platform Magic Software acquired in December 2011, is a proprietary development environment used for managing, maintaining and reusing complicated applications needed by large businesses. It provides the infrastructure for enterprises worldwide, across several industries, with applications running millions of transactions daily on legacy systems. Enterprises using AppBuilder can build, deploy and maintain large-scale custom-built business applications for years without being dependent on any particular technology. The AppBuilder deployment environments include IBM mainframe, Unix, Linux and Windows. AppBuilder is intended to increase productivity and agility in the creation and deployment of enterprise class computing.
AppBuilder follows the 4GL development paradigm to help enterprises focus on the business needs and definition and overlook technical hurdles. AppBuilder developers define the business roles and prior to deployment the code is generated from the development environment to the required run time environment. Several large MSPs have utilized AppBuilder to build state of the art applications that are deployed through many large customers.
AppBuilder implements a model driven architecture approach to application development. It provides the ability to design an application at the business modeling level and generate forward to an application. AppBuilder has a platform-independent, business-rules language that enables generation to multiple platforms. It is possible to generate the client part of an application as Java and the server part as COBOL. As businesses change, the server part can be generated as Java without changing the application logic. Only a simple configuration option needs to be changed.
AppBuilder contains everything a development environment needs to create any type of simple or complex business application with platform-independent functionality, including:
| ● | System administration security controls for scope and permissions; |
| ● | Migration, testing, and deployment functions; |
| ● | Architecture-independent development; |
| ● | An integrated toolset for designing, developing, and deploying applications; |
| ● | Object-based components managed from host, server, or client repositories; |
| ● | Support for Java/J2EE, COBOL, C#, and C programming languages; |
| ● | An efficient, cross-platform code generation facility; |
| ● | Ready-to-use business logic and libraries; |
| ● | A remote prepare facility for mainframe development; |
| ● | Multiple language user interface support; and |
| ● | DBCS support. |
Magic xpi Integration Platform
Magic Software believes data is the most valuable competitive asset today as companies increasingly pursue digital transformation initiatives to modernize their businesses. Enormous amounts of data are being generated by people, applications, and devices worldwide. Enterprises are seeking to connect data across their various applications, systems, and IT environments in order to become data-driven businesses. Understanding and connecting these data assets as well as migrating workloads to the cloud, enables superior insights across the business organization, better service of customers, automation of supply chains, and the democratization of secure, governed data access for all employees.
82
The rise of cloud computing, low-cost data storage and the proliferation of applications that generate and access data, combined with the increasing volume of data from mobile, social and IoT, is resulting in an explosion of the volume, variety, and velocity of data. This new data creates opportunities to generate greater business insights and pursue new market opportunities, but is overwhelming for organizations to manage, aggregate, and normalize. As enterprises undertake the massive transition to cloud, we believe a majority of their workloads will remain on-premises for the foreseeable future due to the mission-critical processes they support. The complexity of this hybrid world will be further exacerbated as enterprises also employ multi-cloud strategies. As a result, we expect enterprises will require new technologies purpose-built to connect, analyze, manage, and normalize data anywhere it resides using modern, cloud-native architectures that can seamlessly be deployed in any IT environment.
Magic Software’s Magic xpi integration platform (an evolution of its original and formerly branded iBOLT platform, launched in 2003) is a graphical, wizard-based code-free solution delivering fast and simple integration and orchestration of business processes and applications. Magic xpi allows businesses to more easily view, access, and leverage their mission-critical information, delivering true enterprise application integration, or EAI, business process management, or BPM, and SOA infrastructure. Increasing the usability and life span of existing legacy and other IT systems, Magic xpi allows fast EAI, development and customization of diverse applications, systems and databases, assuring rapid return on invested capital and time-to-market, increased profitability and customer satisfaction.
Magic xpi allows the integration and interoperability of diverse solutions, including legacy applications, in a quick and efficient manner. In January 2010, Magic Software released Magic xpi 3.2 and since then it has continued to develop the Magic xpi channel. Magic Software entered into agreements with additional system integrators, consultancies and service providers, who acquired Magic xpi skills and offer Magic xpi licenses and related services to their customers. We also offer special editions of Magic xpi with optimized and certified connectors for specific enterprise application vendor ecosystems, such as SAP, Oracle JD Edwards, Microsoft SharePoint and Salesforce.com. These special editions contain specific features and pricing tailored for these market sectors.
Data engineers, Extract-Transform-Load (ETL) developers, and citizen integrators have the ability to use Magic Software’s platform to ingest, transform and integrate data spanning departmental to enterprise scale workloads. These workloads include diverse and distributed data sources in multi-cloud, hybrid environments. The breadth and depth of Magic Software’s data integration capabilities accelerate the aggregation and processing of data to ready it for analytics, data science and enterprise reporting initiatives. Leveraging a simple graphical design experience, users can develop workloads across ETL, Extract-Load-Transform (ELT), real-time and streaming data integration patterns. Magic Software’s platform is designed to integrate structured and unstructured data across on-premises and cloud-native applications, databases, business intelligence tools, data modeling tools, data lakes, data warehouses, mainframes, messaging systems, file systems and IoT devices. Magic Software’s data-lake architecture allows data stewards and business analysts to create an authoritative single-source view of all business-critical data from internal and external sources across multiple data domains, including customers, locations, assets, and employees and many other domain types.
Magic Software’s heritage as a veteran player in the integration market provides it with a differentiated understanding and ability to automate complex processes, and Magic Software has incorporated that expertise into our platform to enable the development of powerful business software. Magic xpi can leverage a complete stack of automation technologies, applying the right automation approach for each specific use case.
83
Key benefits of Magic Software’s platform include:
| ● | Business Process Management. At the core of our platform is an advanced engine that enables the modeling, modification and management of complex processes. This engine enables orchestration of any business workflow. |
| ● | Decision Rules. Appian includes a declarative environment for defining and executing business logic or rules. These rules can be highly complex and can be applied within the Appian platform to many use cases, ranging from automated decision making to user experience personalization. |
| ● | Seamless integration with existing systems and data. In contrast to typical enterprise software, our platform does not require that data reside within it in order to enable robust data analysis and cross-department and cross-application insight. Our platform seamlessly integrates with many of the most popular enterprise software applications and data repositories and can be used within many legacy environments. For example, organizations frequently use our platform to extend the life and enhance the functionality of legacy systems of record, such as those used for enterprise resource planning, human capital management and customer relationship management, by building new applications that enhance the functionality of those systems and by leveraging the data within those systems to further optimize and automate operations. |
| ● | Embrace the full benefits of the public cloud. Our platform helps customers to accelerate the migration of their on-premises workloads to the cloud. Our platform modernizes our customers’ applications and data management capabilities to accelerate migrations to the cloud, allowing them to embrace innovation, create digital-first business models, reduce operating costs, and generate new revenue streams. |
| ● | Deliver rich 360-degree business experiences. By enabling our customers to aggregate, consolidate and normalize their data to build a single source of truth, we empower them to deliver highly engaging and personalized customer experiences. This allows our customers to embrace a digital-first business strategy, build better connections and relationships with their end users, and modernize their supply chains by intelligently matching supply with demand patterns. |
In the aggregate, these core capabilities enable Magic to automate and govern end-to-end processes. Magic complements these automation technologies with related features like process reporting, analytics and management, which make it simple for organizations to quickly improve and upgrade their automations as business needs change.
In 2022, Magic Software continued to expand its product offering with additional features, per customer requests. In March 2023 Magic Software launched Magic xpi Cloud Native, allowing shifting xpi integration projects to the cloud smoothly. The xpi Cloud Native environment configurations based on Kubernetes, focuses on scalability, security, and resilience. The deployment process is made effortless with our new “Cloud Manager”. Cloud Manager interface hides all the complexities of cloud deployment and clustering and performs all the heavy lifting through easy to use and intuitive set of Rest API’s. These APIs also bring agility and efficiency to organizations CI/CD practices via “Continuous Deployment” capabilities.
Magic SmartUX
Magic SmartUX, a platform Magic Software acquired in April 2019, is a low-code development platform for mobilizing and modernizing enterprise business application designed for citizen to professional developers to rapidly design, build, analyze, and run cross-platform mobile business applications.
The Magic SmartUX platform addresses the three biggest challenges enterprises are facing in the road to Digital Transformation:
| ● | Multi-platform: end client devices are abundant and diverse, we provide an omni-channel solution. |
84
| ● | Many Systems of Record: over the years enterprise adopted (home grown and third party) solutions that scattered the business flow over many different system, Magic SmartUX enable the enterprise to expose complex business flows to modern technology with now changes and overhead to the existing working applications. |
| ● | Talent Gap: Mobile and integration are the hardest skillsets for IT orgs to find, with the Magic SmartUX platform addressing Citizens Developers, we allow any intern tech savvy individual to deliver complex and robust Mobile business application. |
FactoryEye
In May 2019, Magic Software launched the release of FactoryEye, a proprietary high performance, low-code, flexible, cloud platform built specially for manufacturers based on a modern architecture enabling advanced manufacturing and organizational intelligence, real-time virtualizations and actionable insights for cross- organizational effectiveness and increased bottom line. Magic Software has hundreds of manufacturing customers, and drew on over 35 years of manufacturing experience to develop FactoryEye.
The product’s intuitive and user-friendly workspace empower manufacturers by providing all the analysis the report they need in order to make faster and smarter decisions based on real time data and analytics. This translates into improved productivity, faster delivery times, and better control over the manufacturing processes, leading to increased customer satisfaction and higher profit margins. FactoryEye offers dozens of prebuilt connectors to a range of enterprise applications and MRP systems, such as SAP, JD Edwards, and Infor, as well as MES, CRM, and PLM systems. FactoryEye collects real-time data from existing machinery, operational and organizational systems and transforms it into actionable intelligence for immediate results and continuous improvement in the manufacturing process and operational efficiency. The solution brings the benefits of Industry 4.0 connectivity to mid-sized manufacturers in several industry verticals, including automotive parts, food & beverage, medical devices, metal processing, packaging, plastics & rubber specialty manufacturing and more.
The addition of FactoryEye to Magic Software’s software portfolio allows Magic Software to provide to its new and existing manufacturing clients, with a comprehensive Industry 4.0 digital transformation solution and aligns with Magic Software strategy of enhancing its portfolio with enterprise grade technologies.
FactoryEye’s end-to-end solution incorporates several key features:
| ● | Powered by Magic Software plug and play IIoT Integration platform. |
| ● | Incorporates advanced analytics and AI into decision support |
| ● | Promote centralized visibility across operations | |
| ● | Access to information necessary to quickly make smart decisions | |
| ● | Flexible, simplified and incremental digital transformation |
| ● | Increased equipment productivity and operational efficiency |
| ● | Improved machine uptime and reduced maintenance costs |
| ● | Leverages investments and allows quick ROI by integrating existing systems |
In addition to offering a dynamic cloud-based software solution, FactoryEye manufacturing consultants work with customers to harmonize their systems and fit the right tools for their needs. Consultants analyze business processes for what is working, formulate a plan to add what is missing from existing systems and create sprints to deliver immediate results. A dynamic cycle of data collection and analysis allows for continuous improvement and flexibility in the optimization process.
85
Since its launch, Magic Software made a targeted effort to reach mid-sized manufacturers who are looking to improve the efficiency of their factories. Our goal is to position FactoryEye as a solution that offers more than mere factory floor visibility through IIoT connectivity, while remaining more cost effective and customizable than offerings from “Tier 1” companies. To that end, Magic Software has built a new website for FactoryEye, as well as blogs, whitepapers, e-books public relations activities, exhibitions and events, round tables and on-line campaigns , all in the purpose of increasing the awareness of this new offering and benefits for mid-sized manufacturers.
FactoryEye brings the benefits of Industry 4.0 to mid-sized manufacturing companies, with an easy, affordable, and flexible approach that does not require changing existing systems and infrastructure. This Industry 4.0 solution captures vast amounts of production data, transforms it into actionable intelligence, and empowers workers, managers and executives to make informed decisions in real-time.
In addition, we continue to market Magic Software’s application and integration products. These products continue to provide value and convenience for our customers as low code options to integrate their disparate systems.
Magic Software Vertical software solutions
Clicks™
Magic Software’s Roshtov subsidiary has approximately three decades of proven experience based on its proprietary comprehensive core software solution for medical record information management systems, using in the design and management of patient-file for managed care and large-scale healthcare providers. The platform, which can be tailor-made to the specific needs of the healthcare provider, is connected to the clinical, administrative and financial data base system, residing at the provider’s central computer, and allows immediate analysis of complex data with potentially real-time feedback to meet the specific needs of physicians, nurses, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, front- and back-office professionals and consumers.
All of our clients that buy or subscribe to our Clicks software solution also enter into software support agreements with us for maintenance and support of their medical record management systems. In addition to immediate software support in the event of problems, these agreements allow clients to access new releases covered by support agreements. In addition, each client has 12-hour access, six days a week (6 hours on Friday) to the applicable call-center support teams.
We employ a team of 35 research and development specialists that together with our clients create a future where the health care system works to improve the well-being of individuals and communities. Roshtov’s proven ability to innovate has led to what we believe to be an industry leading architectures and a breadth and depth of solutions and services.
There are four healthcare service providers in Israel, of which the two largest, Maccabi Healthcare Services and Clalit, which account for approximately 80% of the Israeli market, have been our customers since the early 1990’s.
HR Pulse
Now in its 10th release, HR Pulse is a proprietary platform that creates and customizes software applications for HCM, with the goal to combine technology with effective processes, to facilitate the collection, analysis and interpretation of quality data about people, their jobs and their performance, to enhance HCM decision making, resulting in increased organizational efficiency and effectiveness. HR Pulse addresses four distinct functional areas with the ability to also work as one consolidated system:
| ● | Performance and goal management: |
86
| ● | Development management; |
| ● | Talent management and succession planning; and |
| ● | Compensation and merit review. |
Magic Software’s offering includes customizable “out of the box” HCM SaaS Solutions, such as Pilat Frist and Pilat Professional, that provides a menu of templates that can be used to affordably and expeditiously create customized HCM solutions for companies. The HR Pulse platform promotes the building and implementation of solutions that address broader business challenges as well. Such offerings include 360-degree feedback, employee surveys, leadership and management development, coaching and job evaluation.
Hermes Cargo
Hermes has been developing and evolving cargo management systems for the air cargo industry since 2002. Hermes Air Cargo Management System is a proprietary, state-of-the-art, packaged software solution for managing air cargo ground handling. Magic Software’s Hermes Solution covers all aspects of cargo handling, from physical handling and cargo documentation through customs, seamless EDI communications, dangerous goods and special handling, tracking and tracing, security and billing. Over the last 10 years Hermes systems have been implemented in over 70 terminals on five continents, providing efficient and accurate handling of more than 5 million tons of freight annually. Customers benefit through faster processing and more accurate billing, reporting and ultimately enhanced revenue. Customers include independent ground handlers, airlines with a cargo arm, hubs belonging to an individual airline or those catering to a number of airlines transiting cargo to additional destinations. The Hermes Solution is delivered on a licensed or fully hosted basis.
Hermes systems are built with the specific needs of air cargo handlers and airlines in mind and are amongst the most versatile and sophisticated around. Hermes Solutions are focused on maximizing customer profits by streamlining ground handling processes and employing built-in best practices to reduce handling errors. Hermes team of cargo experts carry out a full business analysis, listen to our customers’ requirements, suggest additional functionality and work with them to deliver an air cargo management solution that is streamlined around their processes and customized to their needs. Hermes works with everyone from smaller cargo handlers to large airlines all over the world and counts Menzies Aviation, Frankfurt Cargo Services, Etihad Airport Services, Pactl’ (Shanghai) and dnata Network among their customers.
Nativ
Offered by Magic Software’s Menarva Ltd subsidiary, Nativ is the leading system for efficient management of all types of rehabilitation centers. Selected by many of the largest rehabilitation and treatment centers in Israel, Nativ serves as a comprehensive solution, the largest and most specialized and equipped system in Israel, with all the capabilities required for operating all aspects of organizations engaged in rehabilitation and treatment. professional software and IT services. From rehabilitation programs to recruitment, Nativ enables control of all levels of rehabilitation bodies, including monitoring detailed rehabilitation plans, finance, collection, account management, recruitment, working hours, asset management, employment and medical files.
In addition, Nativ also contains many integral interfaces, including the Israel’s Ministry of Health’s suppliers portal, Israel’s Ministry of Welfare’s suppliers portal, rent transfers from the Israel’s Ministry of Housing, accounting systems, payroll systems and more. The system produces a wide range of reports, including a receipt report from Israel’s Ministry of Health, Welfare, Economy and Security, comprehensive and detailed information divided into units and services, a detailed living allowance report, patient report, condition report, emergency report and more.
87
Menarva has extensive experience gained in its work over the past 10 years with dozens of clients in Israel, an experience that has given rise to in-depth insights into the field of rehabilitation. Nativ is supported by the cloud and allows connection at any time and from any place for maximum efficiency, including a mobile application for continuous monitoring of field personnel in real time.
Nativ offers maximum survivability, due to the need for high reliability and comprehensive information security, all infrastructure is owned by Menarva and the system complies with all standards and guidelines of Israel’s Privacy Protection Authority, including ISO standards: Standard 9001 for Quality Control, and Standard 27001 for information systems development.
Magic Software Product Development
Magic Software places considerable emphasis on research and development in order to improve and expand the functionality of its technologies and to develop new applications. Magic Software believes that our future success depends upon our ability to maintain our technological leadership, to enhance its existing products and to introduce new commercially viable products addressing the needs of its customers on a timely basis. Magic Software also intend to support emerging technologies as they are introduced in the same way it has supported new technologies in the past. Magic Software will continue to devote a significant portion of its resources to research and development. Magic Software believes that internal development of its technology is the most effective means of achieving its strategic objective of providing an extensive, integrated and feature-rich development technology. For significant version release see “Magic’s Software Solutions” discussed above.
Magic Software Product-Related Services
Professional Services. Magic Software offer fee-based consulting services in connection with installation assurance, application audits and performance enhancement, application migration and application prototyping and design. Consulting services are aimed at generating both additional revenues and ensuring successful implementation of Magic xpa, Appbuilder, Magic xpi, Magic BusinessEye, SmartUX and FactoryEye projects through knowledge transfer. As part of management efforts to focus on license sales, our goal is to provide such activities as a complementary service to our customers and partners. Magic Software believe that the availability of effective consulting services is an important factor in achieving widespread market acceptance.
Services are offered as separately purchased add-on packages or as part of an overall software development and deployment technology framework. Over the last several years, Magic Software has built upon its established global presence to form business alliances with our MSPs that use its technology to develop solutions for their customers, and distributors to deliver successful solutions in focused market sectors.
Maintenance. Magic Software offers our customers annual maintenance contracts providing for unspecified upgrades and new versions and enhancements for its products on a when-and-if-available basis for an annual fee.
Customer Support. Magic Software believes that a high level of customer support is important to the successful marketing and sale of its products. Magic Software’s in-house technical support group provides training and post-sale support. Magic Software believes that effective technical support during product evaluation as well as after the sale has substantially contributed to product acceptance and customer satisfaction and will continue to do so in the future.
Magic Software offers online support systems for its MSPs and end users, providing them with the ability to instantaneously enter, confirm and track support requests through the Internet. These systems support MSPs and end-users worldwide. As part of this online support, Magic Software offers Support Knowledge Base tools providing the full range of technical notes and other documentation including technical papers, product information, and answers to most common customer queries and known issues that have already been reported.
88
Training. Magic Software conducts formal and organized training on its development tools and packaged software solutions. Magic Software develops courses, pertaining to its principal products and provide trainer and student guidebooks. Course materials are available both in traditional, classroom courses and as web-based training modules, which can be downloaded and studied at the student’s own pace and location. The courses and course materials are designed to accelerate the learning process, using an intensive technical curriculum in an atmosphere conducive to productive training.
Magic Software IT Services
Background
The core of Magic Software’s growth strategy is to serve as a one-stop-shop for its clients, helping them accelerate their digital transformation to enhance competitiveness, grow profitability and deliver sustainable stakeholder value. Magic Software uses its deep industry and functional expertise to help clients capture more growth and solve a diverse set of business challenges, including identifying and developing new products and services; improving sales and customer experience; optimizing cost structures; maximizing human performance; harnessing data to improve decision-making; mitigating risk and enhancing security; shaping and delivering value from large-scale cloud migrations; and digitizing manufacturing and operations with smart, connected products and platforms.
Technology is the single biggest driver of change in companies today. Magic Software helps its clients use technology to build their digital core to drive enterprise-wide transformation— such as moving them to the cloud, leveraging data and artificial intelligence, and embedding security and sustainability across the enterprise; by transforming their operations; and by accelerating their revenue growth. Magic Software leverages its scale and global footprint, innovation capabilities, and strong ecosystem partnerships, together with our platforms including to consistently deliver tangible value for our clients.
According to data published by Forrester1 in 2024, and subject to final year-end adjustments, global technology spending was projected to increase by approximately 4.6% in 2024. Within this framework, the software segment was anticipated to grow by approximately 11.5%, while IT services were expected to increase by approximately 3.6%. In comparison, Gartner2 projected global technology spending in 2024 to grow by approximately 7.7%, with the software sector anticipated to expand by 12% and IT services by 5.6%. Gartner further reports that the fastest-growing segment in 20243 was expected to be Data Centers, with a projected annual growth rate of 39.4%, surpassing even the Cloud Computing sector, which has consistently led global IT growth in recent years. Within Cloud Computing, the Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) segment was forecast to grow by 21.3%4, contributing to an overall cloud spending increase of 19.2% in 2024. The substantial increase in Data Center investments is attributed to the accelerated global adoption of smartphones, personal computers (PCs), and AI-optimized servers. Notably, approximately 70% of AI-optimized servers are procured by service providers and hyper-scale cloud vendors, reflecting a significant shift in infrastructure demand dynamics.
In Israel, forecasts for IT spending in 2024 continued to be influenced by the geopolitical environment and associated macroeconomic uncertainties. According to projections by STKI, a leading Israeli IT market research firm, domestic IT expenditures were expected to increase by only 2.95% for the year.
| 1 | https://www.forrester.com/report/global-tech-market-forecast-2024-to-2029/RES182048 |
| 2 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-01-21-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-it-spending-to-grow-9-point-8-percent-in-2025 |
| 3 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-01-21-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-it-spending-to-grow-9-point-8-percent-in-2025 |
| 4 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-19-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-public-cloud-end-user-spending-to-total-723-billion-dollars-in-2025 |
89
Looking ahead to 2025, global analysts anticipate a continuation of the recovery and growth trend in technology investments. Forrester projects an increase of approximately 5.6% in global technology spending in 2025, including 10.5% growth in the software sector and 3.6% in IT services5. Gartner provides a more optimistic forecast, anticipating an overall increase of 9.8% in global IT spending, with the software sector projected to grow by 14.2% and IT services by 9.0%6.
In addition, Data Center investment is expected to remain robust in 2025, albeit at a slightly moderated pace, with projected growth of 23.2%. Cloud Computing expenditures are forecast to grow by 21.5%, with the IaaS segment continuing to lead at an anticipated growth rate of 24.8%7.
In the Israeli market, a notable recovery in IT spending is also expected during 2025. According to STKI, local IT expenditures are projected to grow by approximately 8.17%, reflecting improving market conditions and increased business confidence.
Magic Software services offerings consist of a variety of professional services that can be grouped into integration and other IT services. Its integration services include:
| ● | Infrastructure analysis, design and delivery - management of complex, tailor-made projects and telecom infrastructure projects in wireless and wire-line as well as IT consulting services, mainly for the defense and public sectors. |
| ● | Technology consulting and implementation services - planning and execution of end-to-end, large-scale, complex solutions in networking, cyber security, command & control and high performance transaction systems. |
| ● | Application development - Magic Software specializes in end-to-end projects that feature an array of technologies, from development and implementation of concepts for startups to overall responsibility for the development of systems for large enterprises. Magic Software’s development services include development of on-premise, mobile and cloud applications as well as Embedded and real time software development. |
Magic Software is a talent- and innovation-led organization with approximately 3,787 people as of December 31, 2024, who serve our clients at any given time and whose skills and specialization are a significant source of competitive differentiation. With approximately 3,100 experts, the majority of whom are in the U.S, Israel and Europe, and hundreds of projects gone live in a variety of advanced technologies, we have developed significant expertise and accumulated vast experience in integration projects. Such projects are typically more complex and require a high level of industry knowledge and highly skilled professionals. Our integration expertise, as well as our global reach allows us to deliver comprehensive, value added services to our customers. Our IT services customers include major global telecoms, OEMs and engineering, furnish and installation service companies.
| 5 | https://www.forrester.com/report/global-tech-market-forecast-2024-to-2029/RES182048 |
| 6 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-01-21-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-it-spending-to-grow-9-point-8-percent-in-2025 |
| 7 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-19-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-public-cloud-end-user-spending-to-total-723-billion-dollars-in-2025 |
90
Strategic Consulting and Outsourcing Services
Magic Software provides a broad range of IT consulting services in the areas of infrastructure design and delivery, application development, technology planning and implementation services, cloud computing, as well as supplemental outsourcing services. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Fusion Solutions LLC, Xsell Resources Inc., Allstates Consulting Services LLC, Futurewave Systems, Inc., NetEffects, Inc, OnTarget Group, Inc, the CommIT Group, Infinigy Solutions LLC., The Goodkind Group LLC., EnableIT LLC, Comblack IT Ltd. Shavit Software (2009) Ltd. K.M.T. (M.H.) Technologies Communication Computer Ltd., Executive Life Ltd and Theoris Group Inc., provide advanced IT consulting and outsourcing services to a wide variety of companies including Fortune 1000 companies. Magic Software’s technical personnel generally supplement the in-house capabilities of its customers. Magic Software’s approach is to make available a broad range of technical personnel to meet the requirements of its customers rather than focusing on specific specialized areas. Magic Software has extensive knowledge of and has worked with virtually all types of wireless and wireline telecom infrastructure technologies as well as in the areas of infrastructure design and delivery, application development, project management, technology planning and implementation services. Magic Software’s consulting partners come from a wide range of industries, including finance, insurance, government, health care, logistics, manufacturing, media, retail and telecommunications. With an experienced team of recruiters in the telecom and IT areas and with a substantial and a growing database of telecom talent, Magic Software can rapidly respond to a wide range of requirements with well qualified candidates. Magic Software’s customer list includes major global telecoms, OEMs and engineering, furnish and installation service companies. Magic Software has built long-term relationships with its customers by providing expert telecom talent. Magic Software provides individual consultants for contract and contract-to-hire assignments as well as candidates for full time placement. In addition, Magic Software configures teams of technical consultants for assigned projects at its customers’ sites.
Michpal
Michpal, an Israeli registered company, is a developer of proprietary, on-premise payroll software solution for processing traditional payroll stubs to Israeli enterprises and payroll service providers. Michpal also developed several complementary modules such as attendance reporting, which are sold to its customers for additional fees. As of December 31, 2024, Michpal group serves more than 8,000 customers, most of which are long-term customers.
As part of its payroll software solution, Michpal allows the preparation of employee paychecks, pay statements, supporting journals, summaries, and management reports and supports monthly and year-end regulatory and legislative payroll tax statements and other forms such as payroll social and income taxes, to its clients and their employees. In addition, Michpal enables its clients to connect to certain major enterprise resource planning, or ERP, applications with a certified connector.
In January 2018, Michpal released its new product and a new service line – “Michpal Pension” and “Michpal PensionPlus”, respectively, which led to a 25% increase in revenues of Michpal year over year. These solutions enable all Israeli employers to digitally report their employees’ pension fund payments to their respective pension funds as required by Israeli law (this requirement took effect on February 1, 2018 for employers who employ more than 21 employees, on February 1, 2019 for employers who employ more than 10 employees, on February 1, 2023 for employers who employ more than 3 employees and on February 1, 2024 also for employers who employ less than 3 employees).
In November 2018, Michpal expanded its business through the acquisition of an 80% share interest in Effective Solutions Ltd., an Israeli company that provides consulting services in the fields of operational cost savings and procurement, as well as salary control and monitoring. The two companies have launched, in November 2018, a new service called ‘Michpal YEDA’, adopted by more than 50% of Michpal’s customers, which allows clients to consult with team of experienced professionals, including employment attorneys and HR experts, with respect to payroll, labor, pensions, social security and employee income tax matters.
In January 2019, Michpal launched a supplement service line, “Michpal 360”, specially tailored for payroll service providers, allowing them to offer their clients to digitally report their employees’ pension fund payments to their respective pension funds as required by law.
In November 2019, Michpal completed its second acquisition, acquiring all of the share capital of Unique Software Industries, an Israeli software development and services company, which during its 30 years of operations, has provided integrated solutions in the field of payroll, including pay-stubs, pension services management, education funds management, and software solutions for managing employee attendance. The acquisition constituted an additional strategic move towards the expansion of our operations in the field of payroll and human resources management in which we currently engage primarily through the Michpal group. Following the acquisition of Unique, we started operating in the complementary field of outsourced payroll services, in which we were not active and will allow us to penetrate the field of services bureaus, by way of expanding our present customer base.
91
In May 2020, Michpal completed the acquisition of 70% of the share capital of Liram Finance Software Ltd. (“Liram”), a provider of proprietary integrated specialized management systems in the field of financial accounting, taxation and compliance, for accounting professionals (accountants and tax consultants), bookkeepers, controllers, and CFOs, giving its clients, for more than 35 years, complete confidence in their actions and decisions. Liram’s solutions include specialized financial software solutions for preparation and reporting of financial statements, tax declarations, single-entry and double-entry bookkeeping. fixed asset management and depreciation calculations (under the brand name Ram-Nihul).
In 2021, Liram launched its “RamPlus 360” platform, which is a modular platform offering a wide range of Liram’s software solutions under one integrated working environment (on-premises or online). The new platform has already proven its efficacy during the COVID-19 crisis by enabling financial professionals to continue their work offsite and provide crucial real-time and personalized service to their clients even during the COVID-19 lockdown period, while saving time and preventing errors. We believe that the acquisition of Liram is a strategic step towards the expansion of Michpal’s operations in the field of payroll, human resources and financial management and compliance.
On February 19, 2024, following the exercise of a put option, Michpal acquired the remaining outstanding shares of Liram Finance Software Ltd from that company’s minority shareholder. The total purchase consideration amounted to approximately NIS 5.25 million (approximately $1.45 million), of which NIS 1.0 million (approximately $0.3 million) was paid in advance to the seller in 2023.
In January 2022, Michpal launched its digital employee payroll portal— for employer and employee. The portal allows employees 24X7 access to view their pay stubs and payroll tax history, update their profile information such as their mailing address, phone number, and email address, get notification directly from their employer on every monthly salary payment and extract administrative reports including employee’s monthly attendance reports.
In February 16, 2022, Michpal acquired 70% of the share capital of Formally Smart Form System Ltd. (“Formally”). Formally is an Israeli-based company and the creator of Formally Smart Form platform – a central server platform for managing knowledge and work processes, and for producing digital forms combined with a legally-binding eSignature technology allowing customers to create impressive documents in minutes and get them signed in a snap. Formally offers a variety of proprietary computerized and advanced tools for managing business processes trusted by Israel’s largest financial, banking, and insurance enterprises. Its “no-code” platform, allows to convert outdated forms into a digital process for any company freeing IT teams from ongoing maintenance issues and enables employees across the organization to deliver new digital products quickly and efficiently.
On March 31, 2025, following the exercise of a put option, our subsidiary Michpal acquired all remaining outstanding shares of Formally Smart Form System Ltd for total consideration of NIS 28.2 million (approximately $7.7 million).
On January 1, 2024, Michpal acquired 70% of the outstanding share capital of Heshev Information Systems (2012) Ltd. (“Heshev”) for total consideration of approximately $1.3 million paid in cash. Heshev develops and markets a cloud-native technology platform for managing financial and business operations for accountants, tax consultants, payroll managers, bookkeepers, and financial controllers. The platform includes, among other features, fixed asset management, preparation and submission of financial reports, as well as advanced tools for performing financial simulations and payroll calculations. Additionally, Heshev provides an online platform that enables its clients to manage their financial and business activities entirely digitally, utilizing advanced cloud technologies and providing access to up-to-date professional information. Michpal and the seller hold mutual call and put options, respectively, for the remaining 30% share interest held by the seller in Heshev. These options can be exercised during a consecutive three-year period commencing five years from the acquisition date, at an exercise price determined by a mechanism specified in the agreement.
On July 3, 2024, Michpal acquired 60% of the outstanding share capital of Meida Computers Software Solutions (G.D) Ltd. (“Meida”) for total consideration of approximately $12.49 million and up to approximately $0.8 million in additional, contingent consideration, subject to the achievement of targets set in relation to Meida’s operating profit for the year 2024. Meida engages in the development and marketing of advanced solutions for recruitment and human resources management processes. Meida develops and markets “Adam Total,” a leading platform for candidate recruitment and screening in Israel, which integrates artificial intelligence technologies for candidate sourcing and matching, as well as advanced analytical tools for performance analysis and data-driven decision-making.
92
On October 13, 2024, Michpal acquired 60% of the outstanding share capital of Y-IT Ltd. (“Y-IT”), an Israeli based company, for total consideration of approximately $22.2 million and committed to pay the seller additional contingent consideration subject to Y-IT’s operating profit for the year 2024. Y-IT engages in the development and marketing of a technology platform for managing and optimizing transportation operations and vehicle fleets for companies in the transportation sector. The platform is based on algorithms and automation processes, monitoring tools, attendance data processing and preliminary payroll calculations, advanced financial management tools tailored for the transportation sector, as well as analytical tools for performance management and operational optimization. Y-IT serves over 550 clients in the Israeli transportation industry.
On December 24, 2024, Michpal acquired 70% of the outstanding share capital of Paperless Ltd. (“Paperless”) for total consideration of approximately $2.3 million (of which approximately $0.8 million was paid in January 2025), and committed to pay the seller additional contingent consideration subject to Paperless’ operating profit for the years 2024 through 2026. Paperless is the developer of the cloud-based Paperless platform for digital and online paperless accounting management. The platform is designed for finance professionals, accountants, and tax advisors, and integrates advanced technologies for the automation of accounting processes, including digital invoice processing and automatic journal entry recording. The platform helps its clients improve the efficiency, convenience, and reliability of their financial reporting processes. For further information, please see Note 3(iv) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
InSync
InSync is a US based national supplier of employees to Vendor Management Systems (VMS) Workforce Management Program accounts. InSync specializes in providing professionals in the following areas: Accounting and Finance, Administrative, Customer Service, Clinical, Scientific and Healthcare, Engineering, Manufacturing and Operations, Human Resources, IT Technology, LI/MFG, and Marketing and Sales. With an experienced team of IT recruiters, InSync can rapidly respond to a wide range of requirements with well-qualified candidates. InSync currently supports more than 30 VMS program customers with employees in over 40 states.
Zap Group
Zap Group is Israel’s largest group of consumer websites which manages more than 20 leading consumer websites from diverse content worlds with a total of more than 17 million visits per month, including Zap Price Comparison website, Zap Yellow Pages (the largest business index in Israel) and Zap Rest (Israel’s restaurants index). Zap Group, an Israeli private company, provides a variety of digital advertising solutions for its customers (small and medium businesses in Israel) and an access to an E-commerce platform to allow them engage with their consumers. Zap Group serves over 400,000 listed businesses on its platforms; approximately 16,000 of them are paying customers.
The websites managed and offered by Zap Group offer consumers a user-friendly search experience with a variety of advanced tools, which enable them to make educated purchase decisions in the best and most informed way.
93
Digital Solutions
Zap Group provides a variety of digital advertising solutions for its customers (small and medium businesses in Israel) and access to an E-commerce platform that allows them to engage with their consumers. Zap Group regularly seeks to develop attractive digital solutions, which it believes to have market potential for small and medium businesses and their end user. All of Zap Group’s investments in this area have been proven, where we believe we can leverage our experience to enhance product positioning and increase market penetration. We provide our management and technical and financial expertise, marketing experience to help bring these products to market.
E-commerce Solutions
Zap Group provides an E-commerce platform for approximately 1,500 large, medium and small businesses, which operates stores in Israel. The platform, both website and application, allow end users to compare prices of the various stores for over 1.2 million products in 650 categories. The platform provides to more than 120 million visiting end users annually, 300,000 reviews of stores and products and 5,000 quality guides (videos and articles), which allow them to engage through the platform directly with stores for the purchase of a certain product they looked at through the platform. Total online purchases through the platform are estimated at approximately NIS 2 billion annually, which is estimated as constituting 14% out of total online purchase volume in Israel (not including food and beverage).
In 2021, Zap Group launched a new website for car sellers and buyers, which provides a marketplace where buyers can explore on one website various options for buying a second-hand car (B2C). The platform allows the buyer to compare prices, specs, financing, peripheral services, accessories and overall packages. The online, real-time supply availability enables transparency, and also provides the buyer an aggregated view of specific sellers and agencies, and direct contact with a large pool of sellers.
In December 2022 Zap Group concluded the acquisition of 51% of the outstanding share capital of N.C Marketing and Advertising Ltd. (also known as “Safra digital marketing”) and 51% of the outstanding share capital of Marcomit Ltd. (“Marcomit”). Safra digital marketing is an Israeli company specializing in social media services, including Facebook, Instagram and Tik-tok. Marcomit is an Israeli company specializing in digital branding for large enterprises, including advanced branding materials for media and digital advertising.
Digital platforms
Zap Group provides digital advertising platforms and services through 18 websites for medium and small businesses in 1,600 business categories in Israel, including doctors, lawyers, and other service and product providers. The platform, both website and application allow end users to contact directly with the service provider. The platform provides to more than 50 million visiting end users annually, 200,000 reviews 2,000 quality guides (videos and articles), 300 price lists, and 700 forums with more than 1.5 million expert explanations.
Zap Group also provides its customers other digital services such as Search Engine Marketing (Pay Per Click Google and Facebook campaigns) and Search Engine Optimization for their websites. In addition, Zap Group provides website design services, creation of new websites on various tools (ZAP-X), management of social media, online business cards (GMB), and big data services.
Restaurants and events
Zap Group provides digital advertising platforms and services for more than 17,000 restaurants listed and provides services for social events. Approximately 2,500 of them are paying customers. The platform, both website and application allow end users to directly contact the restaurant for table ordering, ordering of delivery or take away, to post visit reviews or explore the restaurant menu, photo gallery and other content such as articles, etc. The platform provides to more than 30 million visiting end users annually, approximately two million food deliveries, 200,000 reviews, 5,000 food and culinary articles (videos and articles), and more than 0.5 million push updates annually.
Other
Zap Group provides a digital advertising platform for domestic travel and hospitality businesses in Israel. The platform— both website and application— allows end users to order directly from the provider (hotel, guesthouse or attraction service provider). The platform provides access to approximately 1,200 vacation and leisure locations, and to millions of visiting end users annually.
94
Our Affiliated Company
TSG Systems
TSG Systems, or TSG, is a global high technology company engaged in high-end technical solutions for protecting the safety of national borders, improving data gathering mechanisms, and enhancing communications channels for military, homeland security and civilian organizations.
TSG Systems operates primarily in the defense and homeland security arenas. The nature of military and homeland security actions in recent years, including low intensity conflicts and ongoing terrorist activities, as well as budgetary pressures to focus on leaner but more technically advanced forces, have caused a shift in the defense and homeland security priorities for many of TSG Systems’ major customers. As a result, TSG believes there is a continued demand in the areas of command, control, communications, computer and intelligence (C4I) systems, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) systems, intelligence gathering systems, border and perimeter security systems, cyber-defense systems. There is also a continuing demand for cost effective logistic support and training and simulation services. TSG Systems believes that its synergistic approach of finding solutions that combine elements of its various activities positions it to meet evolving customer requirements in many of these areas.
TSG Systems tailors and adapts its technologies, integration skills, market knowledge and operationally-proven systems to each customer’s individual requirements in both existing and new platforms. By upgrading existing platforms with advanced technologies, TSG Systems provides customers with cost-effective solutions, and its customers are able to improve their technological and operational capabilities within limited budgets.
TSG Systems markets its systems and products either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor to various governments and defense and homeland security contractors worldwide. In Israel, TSG Systems sells its defense, intelligence and homeland security systems and products mainly to the IMOD, which procures all equipment for the Israeli Defense Force (IDF).
TSG Systems civilian segment is involved in the development, delivery, integration, customization, support, and maintenance of advanced systems, products, and software solutions for civilian organizations, primarily in the Israeli market. These offerings include specialized platforms for local authorities, such as systems for tax collection, accounting, welfare management, and education administration. TSG Systems also delivers cybersecurity services to a variety of institutional and corporate clients. Additionally, TSG Systems designs and deploys technological solutions to operate customer service call centers for entities across the financial services, telecommunications, and broader commercial sectors. As of the report date, civilian-sector activities are carried out by wholly owned subsidiaries of TSG Systems including E.P.R. Systems Ltd., Bar Technologies Ltd., and Q.R.T. Quality Security Solutions Ltd.
In 2022, TSG Systems acquired 51% of the outstanding share capital of E.P.R. Systems Ltd. (“EPR Systems”). Headquartered in Israel, EPR Systems has over 20 years of experience and serves more than 100 local authorities in Israel. EPR Systems offers comprehensive software solutions for municipal institutions primarily to manage all their billing and collection operations for all types of revenues, including taxes, fees and levies and several innovative extension modules. Additionally, EPR Systems offers a full scope of expert implementation, application management and hosting services, enabling municipal institutions to execute their digital and business strategies. In accordance with the purchase agreement, TSG Systems was given the right to acquire an additional 9% of the outstanding share capital of EPR Systems during the first 12 months following the closing based on the 51% closing date deal value. In January 2023, TSG Systems exercised its right and acquired the additional 9% of the outstanding share capital of EPR Systems.
95
In January 2023, TSG Systems acquired Bar Technologies Ltd., which is an Israeli based company engaged in the development and sale of software and services to local authorities, in aspects related to engineering activities, urban planning, and asset planning, in a manner that complements TSG Systems’ activities and EPR Systems’ activities.
On December 31, 2024, TSG Systems entered into a definitive agreement for the acquisition of all remaining outstanding shares of EPR Systems. This transaction was triggered by TSG Systems’ exercise of a call option stipulated in the initial share purchase agreement. The purchase price for the remaining shares was agreed based on an earnings multiple derived from EPR Systems’ operational results as of December 31, 2024, and is payable in two tranches totaling approximately NIS 53 million (approximately $14.5 million). The consideration is to be paid in two equal instalments of approximately NIS 26.5 million each (approximately $7.27 million): the first upon execution of the option exercise agreement on December 31, 2024, and the second on or before July 1, 2026. This transaction marked the completion of TSG Systems' full acquisition of EPR Systems, aligning with its strategic objective to deepen control over its core municipal software business.
In July 2024, TSG Systems entered into a definitive agreement for the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding share capital of ArtS– Advanced Rail Time Systems Ltd. (“ArtS”), a private company incorporated in Israel. ArtS specializes in the development of test equipment for complex technological systems and system simulators (System of Systems – SOS), as well as integration laboratory systems, primarily serving defense organizations and companies in Israel. Total consideration amounted to NIS 20.5 million (approximately $5.6 million), of which NIS 11.9 million (approximately $3.2 million) was paid in cash upon closing of the transactions. An additional amount of NIS 7.9 million (approximately $2.2 million) represents deferred consideration, presented at fair value, and is scheduled to be paid in December 2025, July 2026, and July 2027. A further amount of NIS 0.7 million (approximately $0.2 million) constitutes contingent consideration, and will be payable on the same dates, subject to adjustments based on ArtS’s operational performance.
In December 2024, TSG Systems entered into a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of the outstanding share capital of Elita Project Management Ltd. (“Elita”), a private company incorporated in Israel. As of the acquisition date, Elita's sole activity was the full ownership of Puzzle Projects Ltd. (“Puzzle”), a company engaged, among other things, in the planning and management of projects, execution of assignments in the fields of technology and operational engineering, training and knowledge transfer, digital and creative services, and the production of exhibitions—primarily for defense-related entities and companies in Israel. Total consideration amounted to NIS 28.9 million (approximately $7.9 million). Of this, NIS 20.5 million (approximately $5.6 million) was paid in cash upon closing of the acquisition; NIS 1.65 million (approximately $0.5 million) was deposited in escrow via a post-dated check; and NIS 0.2 million (approximately $0.1 million) represents contingent consideration, presented at fair value, and is payable in April 2026, subject to conditions related to Puzzle’s performance.
TSG Systems’ offerings include:
Command & Control Solutions
TSG offers sophisticated and innovative command and control solutions that support military and civilian sectors on land, air and sea. TSG provides a variety of command and control solutions ranging from strategic battlefield management to tactical and special operations forces. TSG systems cover all echelons of management, from national and regional levels down to the operational and tactical levels. Its systems are field proven and used by military forces, security services and public safety organizations worldwide.
The command and control solutions developed by TSG are designed to enable the management, control, and oversight of its clients’ relevant operational data, and to manage operational areas across different arms in the field (land, air, and sea). In this framework, TSG’s solutions facilitate the internal processing of data received through the systems, provide precise information on the relevant operational areas, and plan activities through a central control and command center, allowing proper flow of information along the entire chain of command, presenting a unified and complete picture. Furthermore, there are command and control solutions developed by TSG that are intended to be integrated as part of other third-party solutions, such as radar systems. Generally, TSG operates as a subcontractor for these entities, developing integrated command and control systems, including in C4ISTAR configurations.
Among the command and control systems developed by TSG are: i) the Israeli Defense Forces’ General Staff command and control platform— “Triat Agam”— a central C4ISR system of the IDF General Staff designed to link received information with different arms in the field (as of the date of this annual report, and given the completion of the system’s development and implementation, TSG is primarily engaged in the maintenance and upgrade of this system); ii) “Avnei Hoshen”— developed and maintained by TSG for monitoring and controlling the IDF C4I Branch’s communication network; and iii) the “Shual” C4ISR system for Israel IDF Home Front Command— which is installed in municipalities and local authorities across Israel, for activities with Israel IDF Home Front Command. The development process for most of these systems (which generally involves software aspects) is funded by the client, which specifies its needs in each case.
96
Intelligence, Surveillance and Knowledge Management Solutions
TSG Systems Intelligence solutions for security agencies and defense forces meet the demand for accurate and timely intelligence, based on multiple sources and sensors. TSG Systems’ unique technologies cover the entire life-cycle of intelligence, from acquisition to fusion, analysis, distribution, target management and more. TSG Systems’ Knowledge Management solutions provide public sector bodies with the capacity to effectively manage their organizational data, support decision making and follow-up. Thes type of solutions are primarily marketed to security agencies and law enforcement bodies domestically (in Israel) and internationally. These entities utilize these solutions for mapping and analyzing intelligence data, enabling the planning of complex operations and tactical action plans. These capabilities are crucial for preparing and executing strategies that require precise, real-time information to make informed decisions on the ground.
Telecommunication & IT Management Solutions
TSG has extensive experience in developing and integrating telecommunications and IT solutions and tools such as Operations Support Systems (OSS), Contact Centers, Back Office Optimization and Value-Added Services (VAS) that are tailored to meet the requirements of multiple applications. Leveraging deep know-how in telecommunications, TSG provides wide-ranging offering suitable for public and private sector organizations.
Cyber Security Solutions& Services:
TSG provides cutting-edge security services and solutions to government and private sectors including secure critical infrastructure and financial institutions in cyber space. TSG cyber solutions, Cyber Security Center (CSC), Security Training, Security Investigations and Security Engineering support the establishment of a safe, secure and reliable work environment and cover, among other things, Security Engineering, Digital Forensics, Computer emergency response teams (CERT), Mobile Security, and Training.
Homeland Security Solutions (HLS)
TSG’s field proven homeland security solutions maximize safety and security while minimizing threats. TSG provide its clients with paramount technologies ranging from emergency management and Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear defense (CBRN) systems, to rescue& special operations and smart and safe city solutions.
Supporting Tools:
TSG offers a variety of supporting system and solutions, providing dynamic and customizable field proven applications for in the following verticals:
| ● | Facility Management |
| ● | Recording and Debriefing systems |
| ● | Trainers and Simulators |
| ● | Mapping Engines |
We believe that the demand for solutions, systems and services offered by TSG for the defense sector which over the years was generally stable and is expected to increase due to current global developments reflected in the increase of both regions and the scope of events where conflicts occur worldwide such as the Russia-Ukraine war and its repercussions on neighboring European countries and even on other global territories, the Iron Swords war which is perceived as a multi-territory campaign, the security situation in Syria and its global repercussions on nearby areas (such as Israel, Turkey, and even Azerbaijan) and the increasing tensions in the Persian Gulf, as well as neighboring countries in the near and further circles. These trends should lead to increasing investment by many countries (especially some European countries) in their technological systems to strengthen their security infrastructure, creating new opportunities for the marketing of TSG’s products. We believe that these trends may advance TSG’s ability to integrate its products into various systems in the defense sector both domestically and globally, and significantly impact its operational results.
97
Geographical Distribution of Revenues
The following table summarizes our consolidated revenues classified by geographic regions of our customers, for the periods indicated:
| U.S. dollars, in thousands | ||||||||
| 2023 | 2024 | |||||||
| Israel | $ | 1,600,763 | $ | 1,745,132 | ||||
| International: | ||||||||
| United States | 644,918 | 612,196 | ||||||
| Europe | 315,081 | 336,285 | ||||||
| Africa | 26,035 | 26,935 | ||||||
| Japan | 11,881 | 13,678 | ||||||
| Other (mainly Asia pacific) | 22,225 | 23,285 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 2,620,903 | $ | 2,757,511 | ||||
Competition
The markets for the IT products and services we offer are rapidly evolving, highly competitive and fragmented, and, in some cases, present only low barriers to entry, with frequent new product introductions, and mergers and acquisitions. Our ability to compete successfully in IT services markets depends on a number of factors, like breadth of service offerings, sales and marketing efforts, service, pricing, and quality and reliability of services. The principal competitive factors affecting the market for the proprietary software solutions include product performance and reliability, product functionality, availability of experienced personnel, price, ability to respond in a timely manner to changing customer needs, ease of use, training and quality of support.
We face competition, both in Israel and internationally, from a variety of companies, including companies with significantly greater resources than us who are likely to enjoy substantial competitive advantages, including:
| ● | longer operating histories; |
| ● | greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources; |
| ● | greater name recognition; |
| ● | well-established relationships with our current and potential clients; and |
| ● | a broader range of products and services. |
As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements. They may also benefit from greater purchasing economies, offer more aggressive product and service pricing or devote greater resources to the promotion of their products and services. In addition, in the future, we may face further competition from new market entrants and possible alliances between existing competitors. We also face additional competition as we continue to penetrate international markets. As a result, we cannot assure you that the products and solutions we offer will compete successfully with those of our competitors. Furthermore, several software development centers worldwide offer software development services at much lower prices than we do. Due to the intense competition in the markets in which we operate, software products prices may fluctuate significantly. As a result, we may have to reduce the prices of our products.
Matrix’s and Magic Software’s Competitive Landscape
Matrix’s and Magic Software’s principal competitors in the domestic Israeli market are Israeli IT services companies and systems integrators such as: Hilan, Malam-Team, One, Aman, Elad, Yael, Emet Computing, Amdocs, Abra, SQLink, Log-on, HMS, Speedvalue, Kyndryl, IBM Israel, and others. Furthermore, there are dozens of medium and small companies operating in Israel, specializing in the fields of activities in which Matrix and its subsidiaries are engaged, which are also among its competitors.
Matrix’s main competitors in the engineering fields are companies specializing in project management for construction and infrastructure, engineering planning firms, environmental consulting and planning companies, and master planning management firms. These include Eldad Spivak Engineering, Gadish Group, Epstein Project Management, HPT Engineering, and Baran Group.
98
In addition, in recent years, large accounting and advisory firms such as Deloitte and E&Y have expanded their service portfolio to include managed services and consulting in the fields of BI, Cybersecurity, ERP and CRM. We view these firms as direct competition, given that they already have a deep understanding of a particular client’s business because of the accounting and auditing services they provide, and given the trust that they have developed with the client, which is an essential part of providing any services to a client. This international trend is as evident in Israel as it is in all major markets around the world.
Matrix’s and Magic Software’s competitors in the United States market include many companies that provide similar services to those of Matrix and Magic Software, as well as providers of offshore services (mainly from India) which utilize low rates.
To improve Matrix’s and Magic Software’s competitive advantages for their respective offerings in the U.S market, each of Matrix and Magic Software takes steps to reduce the cost of its services by i) performing some of the activities in its Offshore Centers in India (in the case of Matrix, through its subsidiary Xtivia), ii) utilizing its Nearshore Development Centers, recruiting employees for full-time remote work all over the U.S., and iii) by using development resources from Israel. Matrix’s and Magic Software’s international competitors in the Israeli marketplace include Microsoft, IBM, HP and Oracle. These international competitors often use local subcontractors to provide personnel for contracts performed in Israel. Most of these international entities are also business partners of Matrix. The main competitors with respect to infrastructure solutions include One-1, Malam-Team and Emet Computing. With respect to cloud services, competitors include All Cloud and DoIT. Additionally, cloud infrastructure providers such as Google, Microsoft, Azure and Amazon Web Services present competition by offering customers the option to purchase third-party software subscriptions directly from them.
Matrix’s competitors with respect to training are the training centers of the Technion, IITC, HackerU, Ness Technologies, SQLink and Sela.
In the GRC field, Matrix competes in some cases against large corporations such as IBM, Accenture, Oracle, and the consulting divisions of the Big-4 accounting firms, as well as system manufacturers that provide implementation and support services for their own systems, which compete with Matrix’s services.
In the Office Automation field, the Israeli market is characterized by relatively high entry barriers, including substantial capital investments in machinery and the establishment of a logistics and service infrastructure. To the best of our knowledge, Matrix’s main competitors in this field are Getter, Yazamco, Mafil, Copytech, and Tzilomatick.
RDT Equipment and Systems, a subsidiary of Matrix, operates in a variety of fields in the Israeli market and does not have direct competitors across all of its areas of activity combined; however, it does face competition in each individual field. For example, in the field of testing and measurement, RDT competes with companies such as SchneiTech and UniT. In the field of automation, RDT competes with companies such as Siemens, ABB, Zik, and others.
Sapiens’ Competitive Landscape
Sapiens is focused on serving insurers. The market for core software solutions for the insurance industry is highly competitive and characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards and customer requirements, and frequent innovation. In addition, we offer a business decision management platform, mainly to financial services organizations.
Competitive Landscape for Insurance Software Solutions
Sapiens’ competitors in the insurance software solutions market differ from us based on size, geography and lines of business. Some of Sapiens competitors offer a full suite, while others offer only one module; some operate in specific (domestic) geographies, while others operate on a global basis and delivery models vary, with some competitors keeping delivery in-house, using IT outsourcing (ITO), or business process outsourcing (BPO).
The insurance software solutions market is highly competitive and demanding. Maintaining a leading position is challenging, because it requires:
| ● | Development of new core insurance solutions, which necessitates a heavy investment in R&D and in-depth knowledge of complex insurance environments |
| ● | Technology innovation to attract new customers, with rapid, technology-driven changes in the insurance business model and new propositions coming |
| ● | A global presence and the ability to support global insurance operations |
| ● | Ability to manage multiple partnerships, due to the changing landscape of insurers’ ecosystems |
| ● | Extensive knowledge of regulatory requirements and how to fulfill them (they can be burdensome and require specific IT solutions) |
| ● | Continued support and development of the solutions entails a critical mass of customers that support an ongoing R&D investment |
| ● | Know-how of insurance system requirements and an ability to bridge between new systems and legacy technologies |
| ● | Enabling mission-critical operations that require experience, domain expertise and proven delivery capabilities to ensure success |
99
The complex requirements of this market create a high barrier to entry for new players. As for existing players, these requirements have led to a marked increase in M&A transactions in the insurance software solutions sector, since small, local vendors have not been able to sustain growth without continuing to fund their R&D departments and following the globalization trend of their customers.
We believe Sapiens is well-positioned to leverage its modern solutions, customer base and global presence to compete in this market and meet its challenges. In addition, Sapiens’ accumulated experience and expert teams allow it to provide a comprehensive response to the IT challenges of this market.
Different types of competitors include:
| ● | Global software providers with their own IP |
| ● | Local/domestic software vendors with their own IP, operating in a designated geographic market and/or within a designated segment of the insurance industry |
| ● | BPO providers who offer end-to-end outsourcing of insurance carriers’ business, including core software administration (although BPO providers want to buy comprehensive software platforms to serve as part of the BPO proposition from vendors and may seek to purchase our solutions for this purpose) |
| ● | Internal IT departments, who often prefer to develop solutions in-house |
| ● | New insurtech companies with niche solutions |
We differentiate Sapiens from its potential competitors for insurance software solutions through the following key factors:
| ● | Sapiens offers cloud-based innovative and modern software solutions, with rich functionality and advanced, intuitive user interfaces, based on deep domain expertise and insurance know how |
| ● | Sapiens uses model-driven architecture that allows rapid deployment of the system, while reducing total cost of ownership and benefiting from cloud deployment |
| ● | Sapiens’ solutions are built using an architecture that allows customers to implement the full solution or components, and readily integrate the solution or individual components into their existing IT landscape |
| ● | Strong and global partnership program, with established IT players and new insurtech companies, to ensure linkage to innovative technologies and new business models, as well as ongoing work to embed innovation into Sapiens platforms |
| ● | Sapiens identifies technology trends and invests in adjusting its solutions to keep pace with today’s frenetic evolutions |
| ● | Sapiens’ financial stability, and its large and growing global customer base, enables it to fund R&D investment and maintain the competitive advantage of its products Sapiens is able to fund R&D investment and maintain the competitive advantage of its products, due to its large and growing customer base and financial stability. |
| ● | Sapiens’ delivery methodology is based on extensive insurance industry experience and cooperation with large insurance companies globally. Sapiens’ track record over the past few years in developing a strong offshore development center is also a significant parameter in differentiating its abilities in the services space |
Sapiens leverages its proven track record of successful delivery to help our customers deploy its modern solutions, while integrating with their legacy environment (when that legacy environment must remain supported)
Competitive Landscape for Business Decision Management Solutions
Sapiens Decision is a pioneer in this disruptive market landscape. Since the introduction of its innovative approach to enterprise architecture to the market, Sapiens has identified only a small number of potential competitors.
Sapiens differentiates itself from potential competitors through the following key factors:
| ● | Sapiens believes that Sapiens Decision is the only solution (that is currently generally available and already in production) that offers a true separation of the business logic in a decision management system for large enterprises. | |
| ● | Sapiens Decision is unique in its proven ability to support complex environments, with a full audit trail and governance that is crucial for large financial services organizations. | |
| ● | We understand complex environments where Decision is deployed, due to our experience delivering complex, mission-critical solutions. |
100
Magic Software’s Competitive Landscape
The markets for Magic Software Magic xpa and Magic xpi platforms are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions, mergers and acquisitions, and rapidly changing customer requirements. These markets are therefore highly competitive, and we expect competition to continue to intensify. The growth of cloud adoption and mobile markets increases the competition in these areas. We constantly follow and analyze the market trends and our competitors in order to effectively compete in these markets and avoid losing market share to our direct competitors and other players.
With Magic xpa, Magic Software competes in the low-code application platform, SOA architecture and enterprise mobility markets. Our main competitors in those markets fall into two categories: (1) providers of custom software and customer software solutions that address, or are developed to address, some of the use cases that can be addressed by applications developed on our platform; and (2) providers of low-code development platforms, such as Base44, Lovable, Salesforce.com, ServiceNow, Power Apps, Retool, OutSystems, Appian and Mendix.
As Magic Software’s market grows, we expect it will attract more highly specialized vendors as well as larger vendors that may continue to acquire or bundle their products more effectively. The principal competitive factors in Magic Software’s market include:
| ● | Platform features, reliability, performance, and effectiveness; |
| ● | Ease of use and speed; |
| ● | Platform extensibility and ability to integrate with other technology infrastructures; |
| ● | Deployment flexibility; |
| ● | Robustness of professional services and customer support; |
| ● | Price and total cost of ownership; |
| ● | Strength of platform security and adherence to industry standards and certifications; |
| ● | Strength of sales and marketing efforts; and |
| ● | Brand awareness and reputation |
With Magic xpi, Magic Software competes in the integration platform market, which is highly competitive and rapidly evolving. Among its current competitors are IBM, Informatica, TIBCO, MuleSoft, Jitterbit, Talend, Dell–Boomi, Scribe and Software AG.
There are several similar products in the market utilizing the model driven architecture, or MDA, approach utilized by AppBuilder. The market for this type of platform is highly competitive. Companies such as CA and IBM have tools that compete directly with AppBuilder. Furthermore, new development paradigms have become very popular in IT software development and developers today have many alternatives.
As Magic Software’s market grows, we expect that it will attract more highly specialized vendors as well as larger vendors that may continue to acquire or bundle their products more effectively. The principal competitive factors in Magic Software’s market include:
| ● | platform features, reliability, performance and effectiveness; |
| ● | ease of use and speed; |
| ● | platform extensibility and ability to integrate with other technology infrastructures; |
| ● | deployment flexibility; |
| ● | robustness of professional services and customer support; |
| ● | price and total cost of ownership; |
| ● | strength of platform security and adherence to industry standards and certifications; and |
| ● | strength of sales and marketing efforts. |
101
We believe Magic Software generally competes favorably with its competitors with respect to the features, security and performance of its platform, the ease of integration of its applications and the relatively low total cost of ownership of its applications. However, many of Magic Software’s competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources, greater name recognition, larger sales and marketing budgets, broader distribution, more diversified product lines and larger and more mature intellectual property portfolios.
Magic Software’s goal is to maintain its technological advantages, time to market and worldwide sales and distribution network. Magic Software believes that the principal competitive factors affecting the market for its products include developer productivity, rapid results, product functionality, performance, reliability, scalability, portability, interoperability, ease-of-use, demonstrable economic benefits for developers and users relative to cost, quality of customer support and documentation, ease of installation, vendor reputation and experience, financial stability as well as intuitive and out-of-the-box solutions to extend the capabilities of ERP, CRM and other application vendors for enterprise integration.
Michpal’s Competitive Landscape
With respect to Michpal, the market in which it operates is very fragmented and among its current competitors in the Israeli market in which it operates are mainly Hilan, MalamTeam, Tamal, Synel, Oketz systems and others.
Our goal is to maintain Michpal’s technological advantages, time to market, sales and distribution network. Michpal believes that the principal competitive factors affecting the market for its products include developer productivity, rapid results, product functionality, performance, reliability, scalability, portability, interoperability, ease-of-use, demonstrable economic benefits for developers and users relative to cost, quality of customer support and documentation, ease of installation, vendor reputation and experience, financial stability as well as intuitive and out-of-the-box solutions that extend its capabilities to effectively manage its operations and reduce its business risks in the face of changing business environments.
Seasonality
Even though not significantly reflected in our financial results, traditionally, the first and third quarters of the fiscal year have tended to be slower quarters for some of our subsidiaries and our affiliated companies and the industries in which they operate. The first quarter usually reflects a decline following a highly active fourth quarter during which companies seek to complete transactions and projects and utilize budgets before the end of the fiscal year. The relatively slower third quarter reflects reduced activities during the summer months in many of the regions where our customers are located and also reflects the Jewish national holidays in Israel.
In addition, our quarterly results are also influenced by the number of working days in each period in Israel. For example, during the Jewish holidays period (typically at the end of the third quarter and beginning of the fourth quarter or at the end of the first quarter and beginning of the second quarter), when the number of working days is lower, we tend to see a decrease in our revenues, which may impact our quarterly results. Following is the quarterly breakdown, by percentage, of standard working hours in each quarter of 2024 and 2025 in the Israeli market, which accounts for approximately 63% of our annual revenues:
| 1st quarter | 2nd quarter | 3rd quarter | 4th quarter | |||||||||||||
| 2024 | 25.5 | % | 23.6 | % | 26.3 | % | 24.6 | % | ||||||||
| 2025 | 25.5 | % | 24.5 | % | 25.4 | % | 24.6 | % | ||||||||
In 2024, seasonality due to the Jewish holiday periods adversely impacted the second and fourth quarters (in addition to any adverse impact on working hours caused by the reserve military duty of various workers). In 2025, we expect seasonality due to the Jewish holiday periods to adversely impact the second and fourth quarters.
The following table presents our allocation of revenues per quarter in 2023 and 2024 (by percentage):
| 1st quarter | 2nd quarter | 3rd quarter | 4th quarter | |||||||||||||
| 2023 | 25.6 | % | 25.0 | % | 25.0 | % | 24.4 | % | ||||||||
| 2024 | 25.3 | % | 24.2 | % | 25.4 | % | 25.1 | % | ||||||||
102
Raw Materials
Generally, we are not dependent on raw materials or on a single source of supply. We manage our inventory according to project requirements. In some projects, specific major subcontractors are designated by the customer. Raw materials used by us are generally available from a range of suppliers internationally, and the prices of such materials are generally not subject to significant volatility.
Further, although we believe that there are currently adequate replacements for the third-party technology that we presently use and distribute, the loss of our right to use any of this technology could result in delays in producing or delivering affected products until equivalent technology is identified, licensed or otherwise procured, and integrated. Our business would be disrupted if any third-party technology we license from others or functional equivalents of that technology were either no longer available to us or no longer offered to us on commercially reasonable terms. In either case, we would be required either to attempt to redesign our products to function with technology available from other parties or to develop these components ourselves, which would result in increased costs and could result in delays in product sales and the release of new product offerings. Alternatively, we might be forced to limit the features available in affected products. Any of these results could harm our business and impact our results of operations.
Software Development
The software industry is generally characterized by rapid technological developments, evolving industry standards and customer requirements, and frequent innovations. In order to maintain technological leadership, we engage in ongoing software development activity through our investees, aimed both at introducing new commercially viable products addressing the needs of our customers on a timely basis, as well as enhancing and customizing existing products and services. This effort includes introducing new supported programming languages and database management systems; improving functionality and flexibility; and enhancing ease of use. We work closely with current and potential end-users, our strategic partners and leaders in certain industry segments to identify market needs and define appropriate product enhancements and specifications.
Intellectual Property Rights
Sapiens, Magic Software, Matrix (with respect to its proprietary ERP Tafnit system), Michpal, TSG, ZAP Group and their subsidiaries rely on a combination of contractual provisions and intellectual property law to protect their proprietary technology. We believe that due to the dynamic nature of the markets in which we operate and software industries, factors such as the knowledge and experience of our management and personnel, the frequency of product enhancements and the timeliness and quality of our support services, build upon the protection offered by copyrights. We seek to protect the source code of our products as trade secret information and as unpublished copyright work, although in some cases, we agree to place our source code into escrow. We also rely on security and copy protection features in our proprietary software. We distribute our products under software license agreements that grant customers a personal, non-transferable license to use its products and contain terms and conditions prohibiting the unauthorized reproduction, reverse engineering or misuse of its products. In addition, we attempt to protect trade secrets and other proprietary information through agreements with employees, consultants and distributors. Sapiens’ trademark rights include rights associated with its use of its trademarks, and rights obtained by registration of its trademarks. Sapiens’ use and registration of its trademarks do not ensure that it has superior rights to others that may have registered or used identical or related marks on related goods or services. We have registrations for the mark “Sapiens” in the U.S., U.K., Benelux, Germany, France, Italy Switzerland, Israel, South Africa and the European Union. In the past we have registered trademarks and tradenames for many of our products both in the US and in the European Union, and we intend to continue to do so going forward. The initial terms of protection for our registered trademarks range from 10-20 years and are renewable thereafter.
Magic Software has obtained trademark registrations in South Africa, Canada, Israel, the Netherlands (Benelux), Switzerland, Thailand, the United Kingdom and the United States. The initial terms of the registration of its trademarks range from 10 to 20 years and are renewable thereafter. Magic Software’s use and registration of its trademarks do not ensure that it would have superior rights to others that may have registered or used identical or related marks on related goods or services. Magic Software has registered a copyright for its software in the United States and Japan. In addition, it has registered copyrights for some of its manuals in the United States and has acquired an International Standard Book Number (ISBN) for some of its manuals. Magic Software’s copyrights expire 70 years from date of first publication.
In accordance with industry practice, we do not otherwise hold any patents and rely upon a combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and non-disclosure agreements, to protect our proprietary know-how. Our proprietary technology incorporates processes, methods, algorithms and software that we believe are not easily copied. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. We believe that because of the rapid pace of technological change in the industry generally, patent and copyright protection are less significant to our competitive position than factors such as the knowledge, ability and experience of our personnel, new product development and ongoing product maintenance and support.
103
With respect to our defense sector activities, the Israeli Ministry of Defense usually retains specific rights to technologies and inventions resulting from our performance under Israeli government contracts. This generally includes the right to disclose the information to third parties, including other defense contractors that may be our competitors. Consistent with common practice in the defense industry, a majority of TSG Systems’ revenues in 2022, 2023 and 2024 were dependent on products incorporating technology that a government customer may disclose to third parties. When the Israeli government funds research and development, it usually acquires rights to data and inventions. We often may retain a non-exclusive license for such inventions. The Israeli government usually is entitled to receive royalties on export sales in relation to sales resulting from government financed development. However, if only the product is purchased without development effort, we normally retain the principal rights to the technology. Subject to applicable law, regulations and contract requirements, TSG Systems attempts to maintain its intellectual property rights and provide customers with the right to use the technology only for the specific project under contract. Accordingly, TSG Systems is bound by an agreement with the Israeli Ministry of Defense, dated June 26, 2019, for an indefinite period, under which it will pay royalties based on all receipts from security exports, after deducting certain expenses, as detailed in the agreement. As of the date of this annual report, the total amount of royalties that TSG Systems paid from its total sales within the framework of security exports is immaterial.
Regulatory Impact
The global financial and defense services industries served in particular by Sapiens, Matrix, Magic Software, Michpal, TSG Systems and their subsidiaries are heavily subject to government and market regulation, which is constantly changing. Financial services companies must comply with regulations such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Solvency II, Retail Distribution Review (known as RDR) in the United Kingdom, the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, in the EU, the CCPA, a statute that went into effect on January 1, 2020 in California (and similar privacy legislation in New York and elsewhere in the U.S.), the Dodd-Frank Act and other directives regarding transparency. In addition, many individual countries have increased supervision over local financial services companies. For example, regulators in Europe have been very active, motivated by past financial crises and the need for pension restructuring. Distribution of policies is being optimized with the increasing use of bank assurance (selling insurance through a bank’s established distribution channels), supermarkets and kiosks (insurance stands). Increased activity – such as that occurring in Europe – would generally tend to have a positive impact on the demand for our software solutions and services. Nevertheless, insurers are cautiously approaching spending increases, and while many companies have not taken proactive steps to replace their software solutions in recent years, many of them are now looking for innovative, modern replacements to meet the regulatory changes.
Matrix’s and Magic Software’s IT businesses are generally positively affected by regulatory reform and other regulatory changes with respect to banking, insurance and telecommunications in Israel, as such reforms and changes create demand for specific IT solutions, often in a set, short time frame. In particular, regulation on large financial institutions operating in the Israeli financial market is continuously increasing, as a means of reducing the risk associated with the activities of such financial institutions and increasing transparency and increases the demand for Matrix’s and Magic Software’s services offering for entities that become subject to such supervision. Banks’ entry into the sphere of offering advice with respect to pension, insurance and other financial products has also generated demand for Matrix’s IT solutions, given the increased supervision of the Israeli Securities Authority that is triggered by such activities, although the pace at which such demand has grown has been relatively slower. Enhanced disclosure requirements for banks and financial institutions in the Israeli market, such as those published with respect to the required capital liquidity of banks in Israel, have also been generating demand for new IT solutions that Matrix offers. Matrix’s business is also affected by changes in regulations of the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the National Futures Association, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, with respect to requirements relating to Know Your Customer, Customer Identification Programs, Anti-Money Laundering and Fraud Prevention.
In recent years, there has been greater focus on core banking issues, and today a number of banks are in the process of undergoing a gradual examination / replacement of the traditional core systems. The financial market is also facing significant changes and opportunities for the IT market in light of the Strum Reform and its implications for the banking market, credit card companies and other relevant players in the financial market. In the insurance industry, there is a delay in decision making based on the prolonged selling process of some of the companies, and in light of the worsening of the capital adequacy ratios and actuarial reserves that are required by regulators and which affect the profitability of the companies, their ability to distribute a dividend or allocate budgets for IT investments as in the past.
With respect to our defense sector activities, we operate under laws, regulations and administrative rules governing defense and other government contracts, mainly in Israel. Some of these carry major penalty provisions for non-compliance, including disqualification from participating in future contracts. In addition, our participation in governmental procurement processes in Israel, the United States and other countries is subject to specific regulations governing the conduct of the process of procuring defense and homeland security contracts.
Government Contracting Regulations. We operate under laws, regulations, administrative rules and other legal requirements governing defense and other government contracts, mainly in Israel. Some of these legal requirements carry major penalty provisions for non-compliance, including disqualification from participating in future contracts. In addition, our participation in governmental procurement processes in Israel, the United States and other countries is subject to specific regulations governing the conduct of the process of procuring defense and homeland security contracts, including increasing requirements in the area of cyber production and information assurance.
104
Israeli Export Regulations. Israel’s defense export policy regulates the sale of a number of our systems and products, which are developed and marketed by our affiliated company TSG. Current Israeli policy encourages exports to approved customers of defense systems and products such as ours, as long as the export is consistent with Israeli government policy. Subject to certain exemptions, a license is required to initiate marketing activities. We also must receive a specific export license for defense related hardware, software and technology exported from Israel. Israeli law also regulates export of “dual use” items (items that are typically sold in the commercial market but that also may be used in the defense market).
Procurement Regulations. Solicitations for procurements by governmental purchasing agencies in Israel, the United States and other countries are governed by laws, regulations and procedures relating to procurement integrity, including avoiding conflicts of interest, corruption, human trafficking and conflict minerals in the procurement process. Such regulations also include provisions relating to information assurance and for the avoidance of counterfeit parts in the supply chain.
Civil Aviation Regulations. Several of the products sold by TSG for commercial aviation applications are subject to flight safety and airworthiness standards of the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and similar civil aviation authorities in Israel, Europe and other countries.
Buy-Back. As part of their standard contractual requirements for defense programs, several of our customers may include “buy-back” or “offset” provisions. These provisions are typically obligations to make, or to facilitate third parties to make, various specified transactions in the customer’s country, such as procurement of defense and commercial related products, investment in the local economy and transfer of know-how.
Matrix’s and Magic Software’s businesses have not been impacted to a material extent by government regulations.
Environmental, Social & Governance Matters
Our subsidiaries place an emphasis on, and devote considerable time towards, business responsibility, sustainability, and delivering value for their respective customer base, employees, investors, suppliers, and each of their respective communities. This requires that we conduct our business in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, and to adhere to outstanding ethical business practices. Our subsidiaries have developed a strong set of corporate values that inspire ethical behavior throughout their decision-making process and that promote one of their business objectives of bringing together a diverse group with the unique skill sets, knowledge, and talents to effectuate our vision. For example, Sapiens specifically is proud to encourage female advancement in its company, with 36% of its executive leadership consisting of women in 2024. Matrix specifically is also proud to foster a strong female voice in its company, with 52% of its overall human capital resources consisting of women in 2024. We strive to grow women’s representation within our operations.
| C. | Organizational Structure |
Formula is the parent company of the Formula Group.
The following table presents certain information regarding the control and ownership of our directly held investments in subsidiaries and affiliates, as of April 30, 2025.
| Subsidiaries and affiliate | Country of Incorporation |
Percentage of Ownership |
||||
| Matrix IT Ltd. | Israel | 48.14 | % | |||
| Sapiens International Corporation N.V. | Cayman Islands | 43.50 | % | |||
| Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. | Israel | 46.71 | % | |||
| Michpal Micro Computers (1983) Ltd. | Israel | 100.0 | % | |||
| TSG IT Advanced Systems Ltd. | Israel | 42.34 | % | |||
| InSync Staffing Solutions, Inc. | Delaware | 90.09 | % | |||
| Ofek Aerial Photography Ltd | Israel | 80 | % | |||
| Zap Group Ltd. | Israel | 100 | % | |||
| Shamrad Electronic (1997) Ltd | Israel | 100 | % | |||
| Hashahar Telecom and Electricity Ltd | Israel | 51.0 | % | |||
| Other associated company | Israel | 21.45 | % | |||
The common shares of Sapiens and the ordinary shares of Magic Software are each traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and on the TASE, and the ordinary shares of Matrix are traded on the TASE.
105
| D. | Property, Plants and Equipment |
Formula’s headquarters, as well as the headquarters and principal administrative, finance, sales, marketing and research and development office of Magic Software, are located in Or-Yehuda, Israel, a suburb of Tel Aviv. Magic Software leases its and our office space, constituting approximately 32,404 square feet, under a lease agreement entered in November 2019. The lease expires in June 2033, with an option by Magic Software to extend for an additional two 5-year term. In 2024, Magic Software paid $0.7 million under that lease. In addition, Magic Software subsidiaries lease office spaces in the United States, Israel, Europe, India, Japan and South Africa. In 2024, Magic Software’s rent costs for those additional facilities totaled $3.5 million, in the aggregate. We believe that Magic and our existing facilities are adequate for our current needs.
Matrix leases approximately 773,785 square feet of office space in various locations in Israel (primarily in Kfar Saba, Tel Aviv, Rosh HaAyin, Jerusalem, Modi'in, Tefen, and Lod) pursuant to leases of varying duration, which includes the facility in Kfar Saba that as of 2024 serves as Matrix’s corporate headquarters. In addition, Matrix leases an aggregate of approximately 54,756 square feet of office space in locations outside of Israel, in the United States, Bulgaria, Macedonia , India and the UK. The lease terms for the spaces that Matrix currently occupies are generally three to four years. In 2024, Matrix moved its headquarters to a new campus in the O-TECH complex in Kfar Saba. The new campus consists of 172,222 square feet of office space across 14 building floors and 150,695 square feet of parking space across 5 building floors. The lease term for the new campus expires in January 2032, with an option by Matrix to extend for an additional two 5-year term with an annual rent cost of approximately NIS 20 million (approximately $5.5 million). In the year ended December 31, 2024, Matrix’s rent costs totaled NIS 74.5 million (approximately $20.1 million), in the aggregate, for all of its leased offices. We believe that Matrix’s existing facilities are adequate for its current needs.
Sapiens leases office space in India, Israel, the United States, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Germany, The United Kingdom, Spain, China, Denmark, Portugal, Turkey and South Africa. The lease terms for the spaces that Sapiens currently occupies are generally one to five years, with the lease term for one site extending to 2031, and another one to 2036. Based on Sapiens’ current occupancy, it leases the following amount of space in the following locations (offices over 500 square feet), which constitute Sapiens’ primary locations: in India, approximately 160,641 square feet; in Israel, approximately 79,489 square feet of office space; in the United States, approximately 24,698 square feet (13,890 square feet that is used by Sapiens, while 10,808 square feet is subleased); in Poland, approximately 23,451 square feet; in Germany, approximately 9,086 square feet; in Lithuania, 24,370 square feet (14,516 square feet that is used by Sapiens)— Sapiens plans to relocate to a site that has 9,851 square feet in March 2025, as its lease at its current site expires in March 2025; in Latvia, approximately 21,362 square feet; in Denmark, approximately 4,355 square feet; in the United Kingdom, approximately 7,374 square feet; in Spain, approximately 6,700 square feet; and in China, approximately 5,175 square feet. Sapiens Israeli offices house its corporate headquarters, as well as its core delivery research and development activities. We believe that Sapiens’ existing facilities are adequate for our current needs. In 2024, Sapiens’ rent costs totaled $8.4 million, in the aggregate, for all of its leased offices. We believe that Sapiens’ existing facilities are adequate for its current needs.
Michpal leases approximately 58,141 square feet of office space in various locations in Israel pursuant to leases of varying duration, including for a facility in Petach-Tikva that serves as Michpal’s corporate headquarters. During the year ended December 31, 2024, Michpal’s rent costs totaled NIS 5.1million (approximately $1.4 million), in the aggregate, for its leased office space.
Zap Group leases approximately 44,735 square feet of office space in various locations in Israel pursuant to leases of varying duration, including for a facility in Petah-Tikva that serves as Zap Group’s corporate headquarters. During the year ended December 31, 2024 Zap Group’s rent costs totaled $1.0 million, in the aggregate, for its leased office space.
Ofek leases approximately 18,600 square feet of office space in Netanya, Israel, under a lease agreement entered in March 2020 for a term of six (6) years. During the year ended December 31, 2024, Ofek’s rent costs totaled $0.1 million, for its leased office space.
We believe that our properties are adequate for our present use of them. If in the future we require additional space to accommodate our growth, we believe that we will be able to obtain such additional space without difficulty and at commercially reasonable prices.
As described in “Subsidiary Commitments” in Item 5.B below, while our subsidiaries and our affiliated companies have incurred liens on leased vehicles, leased equipment and other assets in favor of leasing companies, neither Formula nor any subsidiary has encumbered the real property that it uses in its operations.
We furthermore believe that there are no environmental issues that encumber our use of our facilities.
106
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
Overview
We are a global software solutions and IT professional services holdings company that is principally engaged through our directly held investees in providing proprietary and non-proprietary software solutions and IT professional services, software product marketing and support, computer infrastructure and integration solutions and learning and integration. We deliver our solutions in numerous countries worldwide to customers with complex IT services needs, including a number of “Fortune 1000” companies.
Since our inception, we have acquired effective controlling interests, and have invested, in companies which are engaged in the IT solutions and services business. We, together with our investees, are known as the Formula Group.
Other than our joint control of TSG Systems, in which each of Formula and Israeli Aerospace Industries Ltd. holds 42.71% of its voting power (as of December 31, 2024), and our 21.45% share interest in an associate company, we currently have effective control under IFRS 10 in each of our other investees, consisting of Matrix, Sapiens, Magic Software, Michpal, Ofek Aerial Photography, InSync, Shamrad Electronics, Zap Group and Hashahar Telecom, despite the lack of absolute majority of voting power in Matrix, Magic Software and Sapiens. As a result of our effective control in these investees as of December 31, 2024, and in accordance with IFRS 10, we consolidated their financial results with ours throughout the period covered by the financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report. Prior to our transition to reporting under IFRS, we consolidated investees in which we held an equity interest only if we held a controlling interest in those companies. Under IFRS 10, we may consolidate entities in which we have effective control. For further information, please see Note 2(3) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Except for providing our investees with our management, technical expertise and marketing experience to help them create a consecutive positive economic impact and long-term value and direct their overall strategy through our active involvement, we do not conduct independent operations at our parent company level. Our operating results are, and have been, directly influenced by the business operations of our subsidiaries and affiliated company.
Our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024 are prepared in accordance with IFRS. We have presented herein consolidated statements of financial position that comply with IFRS applicable as of December 31, 2023 and 2024. Our consolidated statements of profit or loss presented herein in IFRS cover the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023, and 2024.
We recognize revenues in two categories: the delivery of software services and the delivery of proprietary software solutions and related services. All of our investees, recognize revenues from the delivery of software services, and most of them recognize revenues in both revenue categories. For ease of reference, we have separated our subsidiaries into these categories in accordance with the category in which each subsidiary has earned most of its revenues (although each type of revenue is nevertheless recorded according to actual revenue type, rather than based on strict, subsidiary-demarcated categories).
Our functional and reporting currency
Based on our examination and evaluation of the primary economic environment in which Formula currently operates and expects to continue to operate and, taking into consideration the recent trends and our forward-looking business strategy, in accordance with the International Accounting Standard 21 (IAS 21), the currency of the primary economic environment in which Formula’s operations on a standalone basis are currently conducted is the NIS. The functional currencies applied by our investees which are consolidated in these financial statements are the currencies of the primary economic environment in which each one of them operates. We have elected to use the dollar as our reporting currency for all years presented since we believe that financial statements in U.S. dollars provide more relevant information to our investors and users of the financial statements.
Assets, including fair value adjustments upon acquisition, and liabilities of an investee which is a foreign operation, are translated at the closing rate at each reporting date. Profit or loss items are translated at average exchange rates for all periods presented. The resulting translation differences are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).
Intragroup loans for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future are, in substance, a part of the investment in the foreign operation and, accordingly, the exchange rate differences from these loans (net of the tax effect) are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss).
107
Upon the full or partial disposal of a foreign operation resulting in loss of control in the foreign operation, the cumulative gain (loss) from the foreign operation which had been recognized in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss. Upon the partial disposal of a foreign operation which results in the retention of control in the subsidiary, the relative portion of the amount recognized in other comprehensive income is reattributed to non-controlling interests.
Transactions denominated in foreign currency are recorded upon initial recognition at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. After initial recognition, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated at each reporting date into the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. Exchange rate differences, other than those capitalized to qualifying assets or accounted for as hedging transactions in equity, are recognized in profit or loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency and measured at cost are translated at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency and measured at fair value are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined.
For those subsidiaries whose functional currency has been determined to be their local currency, assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates and statement of income items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Such translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in equity.
| A. | Operating Results |
This section presents an analysis of our results of operations, on a comparative basis, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. We have omitted herein a comparative analysis of our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. In order to view that latter analysis, please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023, which we filed with the SEC on May 15, 2024, which analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023
The following tables set forth certain data from our statement of profit or loss for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, as well as such data as a percentage of our revenues for those years. The data has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The operating results for the below years should not be considered indicative of results for any future period. This information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this annual report.
Statements of Profits or Loss
(U.S. dollars, in thousands)
| 2023 | 2024 | |||||||
| Revenues | $ | 2,620,903 | $ | 2,757,511 | ||||
| Cost of revenues | 1,977,192 | 2,072,828 | ||||||
| Gross profit | 643,711 | 684,683 | ||||||
| Research and development expenses, net | 77,968 | 84,380 | ||||||
| Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses | 326,375 | 335,151 | ||||||
| Capital gain | - | 5,369 | ||||||
| Operating income | 239,368 | 270,521 | ||||||
| Financial expenses | (42,134 | ) | (38,063 | ) | ||||
| Financial income | 13,800 | 15,920 | ||||||
| Pre-tax income before share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net | 211,034 | 248,378 | ||||||
| Share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net | 773 | 2,077 | ||||||
| Taxes on income | 46,075 | 56,665 | ||||||
| Net income | $ | 165,732 | $ | 193,790 | ||||
| Attributable to: | ||||||||
| Equity holders of the Company | 64,014 | 79,670 | ||||||
| Non-controlling interests | 101,718 | 114,120 | ||||||
108
Statement of Profits or Loss as a
Percentage of Revenues
| 2023 | 2024 | |||||||
| Revenues | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
| Cost of revenues | 75.4 | % | 75.2 | % | ||||
| Gross profit | 24.6 | % | 24.8 | % | ||||
| Research and development expenses, net | 3.0 | % | 3.1 | % | ||||
| Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses | 12.5 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||
| Capital gain | - | % | 0.2 | % | ||||
| Operating income | 9.1 | % | 9.8 | % | ||||
| Financial expenses | (1.6 | )% | (1.4 | )% | ||||
| Financial income | 0.5 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||
| Pre-tax income before share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net | 8.0 | % | 9.0 | % | ||||
| Share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net | 0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||
| Taxes on income | 1.8 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||
| Net income | 6.3 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Attributable to: | ||||||||
| Equity holders of the Company | 2.4 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||
| Non-controlling interests | 3.9 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||
Revenues. Revenues in 2024 increased by approximately 5.2%, from $2,620.9 million in 2023 to $2,757.5 million in 2024. Revenues from the two categories of our operations were as follows: revenues from the delivery of software services increased by approximately 5.5%, from $1,927.5 million in 2023 to $2,032.6 million in 2024, and revenues from the sale of our proprietary software products and related services increased by approximately 4.5%, from $693.4 million in 2023 to $724.9 million in 2024.
Software Services Revenues
The increase in software services revenues was recorded across the following of our investees reporting under this revenue stream— Matrix, Magic Software, Zap, Ofek Aerial Photography, Shamrad and Hashahar Telecom (the last of which was included for the first time in our revenues beginning from its consolidation as of October 2024) — and was primarily due to growth in their revenues as described below.
Matrix
Matrix’s revenues reported under this revenue stream increased from NIS 5,086.4 million (approximately $1,380.3 million) in 2023 to NIS 5,411.7 million (approximately $1,463.1 million) in 2024, reflecting an increase of approximately 6.4% when measured in NIS, Matrix’s local currency (compared to 6.0% when measured in U.S dollars). The increase in Matrix revenues recorded under this revenue stream compared to the prior year, 2023, was primarily attributable to an expansion in operations within the Matrix Information Technology Solutions and Services, Consulting, and Management in Israel business segment, along with growth in Matrix’s Sales, Marketing, and Support of Software Products business segment. These increases were partially offset by a decline in revenues from Matrix’s Information Technology Solutions and Services in the United States business segment. The majority of the revenue growth was organic. The effect of first-time consolidation of newly acquired entities—Ortec (consolidated as of December 2024) and Alacer (consolidated as of the fourth quarter of 2024)— was minimal, as those consolidations occurred at the end of the year. Excluding the effect of those consolidations, Matrix achieved organic revenue growth of approximately 6.5% for the full year. When further excluding the impact of increased revenues reported on a net basis (referring mainly to cloud), the organic growth rate amounted to approximately 9.9% for 2024.
Magic Software
Magic Software's revenues under this revenue stream increased by approximately 3.6%, from $455.5 million in 2023 to $472.0 million in 2024. This growth (the majority of it was organic) was primarily driven by: (i) strong demand from existing customers in Israel and internationally—particularly within the financial, High-Tech and defense sectors—for Magic Software’s professional services; and (ii) the full-year consolidation of revenues from its subsidiary, K.M.T. Software Integration Ltd. (“KMT”), acquired on June 8, 2023, which contributed approximately $2.8 million to total revenues. These positive contributions were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $26.8 million in revenues from professional services in North America. The decline was primarily attributable to the decision of Magic Software’s largest revenue-generating client to suspend, without prior notice and due to internal considerations unrelated to Magic Software’s performance, significant portions of its active time-and-materials-based project beginning in the third quarter of 2023.
109
ZAP Group
Zap Group’s revenues, reported under this revenue stream, decreased by approximately 12.4% from $14.1 million in 2023 to $12.3 million in 2024. The decrease in Zap Group’s revenues reported under this revenue stream was primarily attributable to a decrease in the demand for Zap Group’s advertising services, which was mainly a result of Israel’s “Iron Swords” war against Hamas and other terrorist groups.
Ofek Aerial Photography
Ofek Aerial Photography’s revenues, reported under this revenue stream, increased by approximately 46.5% from $8.9 million in 2023 to $13.0 million in 2024. The increase in Ofek Aerial Photography’s revenues reported under this revenue stream was primarily attributable to the first-time consolidation of Ofek Aerial Photography’s subsidiary Yona Engineering Consulting & Management Ltd., acquired on March 31, 2024, which contributed $3.8 million to its revenues, and to improved demand from existing customers in Israel particularly within the defense sector, mainly resulting from the “Iron Swords War”.
Proprietary Software Products and Related Services Revenues
The increase in revenues from proprietary software products and related services was primarily attributable to i) the increase of Sapiens revenues by approximately 5.4% from $514.6 million in 2023 to $542.4 million in 2024 and ii) the increase of Michpal revenues by approximately 19.8% from $28.6 million in 2023 to $34.2 million in 2024; offset, in part, by the decrease by approximately 17.6%, from $31.2 million in 2023 to $25.7 million in 2024, in Zap Group’s revenues, reported under this revenue stream, resulting from a decrease in the demand for Zap Group’s advertising services mainly resulting from the “Iron Swords War”.
Sapiens
Sapiens’ revenues increased by $27.8 million, or 5.4%, to $542.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $514.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in revenues of approximately $27.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily attributable to Sapiens’ core solutions. Sapiens’ revenues in North America increased by $13.4 million, or 6.3%, to $225.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $212.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. That increase was attributable to organic growth of Sapiens’ insurance products, mainly in the P&C business. Sapiens’ revenues in Europe increased by $12.5 million, or 4.9%, to $269.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $257.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. That increase was primarily attributable to the organic growth of Sapiens’ core business P&C and L&P. Sapiens’ revenues in the rest of the world increased by $1.9 million, or 4.3%, to $47.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $45.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Michpal
Michpal Group’s revenue reported under this revenue stream increased from NIS 105.2 million (approximately $28.6 million) in 2023 to approximately NIS 126.8 million (approximately $34.2 million) in 2024, reflecting an increase of 20.5% when measured in NIS. The increase in revenues of approximately NIS 21.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, was primarily attributable to increased demand for Michpal’s group payroll and financial solutions and to the first-time inclusion of revenues from Heshev Information Systems (consolidated as of January 2024), Meida Computers Software Solutions (G.D) Ltd. (consolidated as of July 2024) and Y-IT Ltd (consolidated as of October 2024).
Magic Software:
Magic Software’s revenues, reported under this revenue stream, increased by approximately 1.2% from $79.6 million in 2023 to $80.5 million in 2024. The increase in Magic Software’s revenues reported under this revenue stream was primarily attributable to increased demand for Magic Software’s software solutions and third-party products.
A breakdown of our overall revenues into (i) proprietary software products and related services revenues and (ii) software services revenues for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, the percentage those respective categories of revenues constituted out of our total revenues in those years, and the percentage change for each such category of revenues from 2023 to 2024, are provided in the below table:
| Year ended December 31, | Year-over | Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | Year | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | Percentage | change | Revenues | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue category | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Proprietary software products and related services | 693,426 | 26.46 | % | 31,474 | 724,900 | 26.29 | % | |||||||||||||
| Software services | 1,927,477 | 73.54 | % | 105,134 | 2,032,611 | 73.71 | % | |||||||||||||
| Total | 2,620,903 | 100 | % | 136,608 | 2,757,511 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
110
Revenues by geographical region
The dollar amount of our revenues attributable to each of the geographical regions in which we conduct our operations for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, respectively, were as follows:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2023 | 2024 | |||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||
| Israel | $ | 1,600,763 | $ | 1,745,132 | ||||
| International: | ||||||||
| United States | 644,918 | 612,196 | ||||||
| Europe | 315,081 | 336,285 | ||||||
| Africa | 26,035 | 26,935 | ||||||
| Japan | 11,881 | 13,678 | ||||||
| Other (mainly Asia pacific) | 22,225 | 23,285 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 2,620,903 | $ | 2,757,511 | ||||
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues consists primarily of compensation expense to employees and subcontractors, royalties and licenses payable to third parties, amortization of acquired technologies, capitalized software and depreciation, cloud-related cost, and hardware and other materials costs. Cost of revenues increased by 4.8% from $1,977.2 million in 2023 to $2,072.8 million in 2024. As a percentage of total revenues, costs of revenues in 2023 and 2024 remained relatively stable at 75.4% in 2023 compared to 75.2% in 2024.
Our proprietary software solutions and related services sales are generally characterized by a higher gross margin than sales of our software services. The cost of revenues for proprietary software solutions and related services increased from $365.6 million in 2023 to $377.4 million in 2024. As a percentage of our proprietary software solutions and related services revenues, costs of revenues for proprietary software solutions and related services decreased slightly from 52.7% in 2023 to 52.1% in 2024.
The cost of revenues for software services increased from $1,611.6 million in 2023 to $1,695.4 million in 2024. As a percentage of software services revenues, costs of revenues for software services remained relatively stable, at 83.4% in 2024 compared to 83.6% in 2023.
Matrix
Matrix’s cost of revenues increased by approximately 6.2%, when measured in NIS, Matrix’s local currency, from NIS 4,467.9 million (approximately $1,212.6 million) in 2023 to NIS 4,746.5 (approximately $1,283.3 million) in 2024. The increase in absolute cost of revenues was in line with the increase in Matrix revenues. Cost of revenues amounted to 85.1% as a percentage of Matrix’s revenues during the year ended December 31, 2024, which represented a slight decrease from the corresponding percentage for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was 85.4%.
Matrix’s cost of revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024 does not include amounts of share-based compensation.
Sapiens
Sapiens’ cost of revenues increased by $11.4 million, or 3.9%, to $303.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $292.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was mainly attributable to costs related to Sapiens’ support for its overall organic core business growth, which was mainly comprised of compensation expense to employees and subcontractors in an amount of $9.0 million. Cost of revenues amounted to 55.9% as a percentage of Sapiens’ revenues during the year ended December 31, 2024, which represented a decrease of 0.9% from the corresponding percentage for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was 56.8%.
Sapiens’ cost of revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024 does not include amounts of share-based compensation.
Magic Software
Magic Software’s cost of revenues increased by approximately 3.3%, from $382.1 million in 2023 to $394.7 million in 2024. This increase was consistent with the year-over-year growth in total revenues, which rose by 3.3% from $535.1 million in 2023 to $552.5 million in 2024. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues remained stable at 71.4% for both the year ended December 31, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2024. Magic Software’s cost of revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024 does not include amounts of share-based compensation.
111
InSync
InSync’s cost of revenues increased by 1.7% from $44.5 million in 2023 to $45.3 million in 2024 despite InSync’s revenues remaining relatively stable at $52.5 million in 2024 compared to $52.7 million in 2023. Cost of revenues amounted to 86.3% as a percentage of Insync’s revenues during the year ended December 31, 2024, which reflects an increase by 19 basis points from the corresponding percentage for the year ended December 31, 2023, measured at 84.4%. Insync’s cost of revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024 does not include amounts of share-based compensation.
ZAP Group
Zap Group’s overall cost of revenues decreased by approximately 12.6% from $19.2 million in 2023 to $16.8 in 2024. Cost of revenues amounted to 44.1% as a percentage of Zap Group’s revenues during the year ended December 31, 2024, which was an increase of 17 basis points from the corresponding percentage for the year ended December 31, 2023, measured at 42.4%. The decrease in Zap Group’s absolute cost of revenues was in line with the decrease in Zap Group’s overall revenues from $45.3 million in 2023 to $38.1 million in 2024. The decrease in Zap Group’s overall revenues was mainly attributable to lower levels of demand in 2024 compared to 2023 primarily resulting from the continued challenging economic environment due to relatively high interest rates, persistent inflation and reduced capital spending, along with the consequences of the outbreak of the “Iron Swords War”.
Zap Group’s cost of revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024 does not include amounts of share-based compensation.
Ofek Aerial Photography
Ofek Aerial Photography’s cost of revenues, increased by approximately 45.3%, from $5.9 million in 2023 to $8.5 million in 2024, in line with the increase in Ofek Aerial Photography’s revenues, which grew by 46.5% year over year. The increase in Ofek Aerial Photography’s cost of revenues was primarily attributable to the first-time consolidation of Ofek Aerial Photography’s subsidiary Yona Engineering Consulting & Management Ltd., acquired on March 31, 2024, which contributed $2.3 million to its cost of revenues.
Michpal
Michpal’s cost of revenues increased by approximately 7.6% from $15.0 million in 2023 to $16.1 million in 2024, in line with the increase in Michpal’s revenues, which grew by 11.7% year over year. The increase in Michpal’s cost of revenues was primarily attributable to the first-time inclusion of cost of revenues of Heshev Information Systems (consolidated as of January 2024), Meida Computers Software Solutions (G.D) Ltd (consolidated as of July 2024) and Y-IT Ltd (consolidated as of October 2024).
Operating Expenses:
Research and Development Expenses, net. Research and development, or R&D, expenses consist primarily of compensation expense to employees and subcontractors engaged in research and development. Research and development expenses, net, consist of research and development expenses, gross, less capitalized software costs.
Research and development expenses, gross, increased from $88.0 million in 2023 to $94.4 million in 2024, mainly due to an increase in Sapiens’ number of R&D employees in 2024 compared to 2023, along with, to a certain extent, the full-year effect of an increase in compensation expenses to employees, which was mostly implemented with respect to the employees of Magic Software’s subsidiary, Appush Ltd.
Capitalization of software costs in 2023 and 2024 was attributable to our subsidiaries engaged in providing proprietary software solutions (i.e., Magic Software and certain of its subsidiaries, Sapiens and certain of its subsidiaries, and Michpal and certain of its subsidiaries). Research and development expenses, net, increased from $78.0 million in 2023 to $84.4 million in 2024, mainly due to the factors described above.
As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses, net, slightly increased from 3.0% in 2023 to 3.1% in 2024. Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 do not include expense amounts for share-based compensation.
112
Selling, Marketing General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, marketing, general and administrative, or SMG&A, expenses consist primarily of cost of compensation expense to employees and subcontractors involved in sales, marketing, management and administrative functions, travel expenses, selling expenses, rent, utilities, communications expenses, expenses related to external consultants, depreciation, amortization and other expenses. Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses increased from $326.4 million in 2023 to $335.2 million in 2024. As a percentage of revenues, SMG&A expenses slightly decreased from 12.5% in 2023 to 12.2% in 2024.
The increase in SMG&A expenses in 2024 was mainly attributable to an increase of $3.0 million in Matrix’s SMG&A expenses, primarily resulting from the expansion in the scale of Matrix’s operations in 2024 compared to 2023. Notably, despite the absolute increase, these expenses declined as a percentage of Matrix’s total revenues from 7.1% in 2023 to 6.9% in 2024. Matrix’s SMG&A expenses for 2024 included NIS 22.2 million (approximately $6.0 million) in amortization of intangible assets recognized in connection with business combinations, compared to NIS 26.7 million (approximately $7.2 million) in the prior year. Matrix’s administrative and general expenses for 2024 included NIS 18.0 million (approximately $4.9 million) related to share-based compensation, compared to NIS 16.1 million (approximately $4.4 million) in 2023. Our increased SMG&A expenses in 2024 also reflected an increase of $7.7 million in Sapiens’ SMG&A expenses (when measured in accordance with IFRS). Sapiens’ 2024 SMG&A amounted to approximately $85.5 million (approximately 15.8% of Sapiens’ revenues) for the year 2024, compared to approximately $77.7 million (approximately 15.1% of Sapiens’ revenues) for the year 2023. This increase was mainly attributable to: (A) $1.6 million of additional allowance for credit losses; (B) $1.0 million of expenses for potential acquisitions; and (C) $3.4 million of compensation expenses for employees and subcontractors, primarily due to Sapiens’ increased investment in sales and marketing. The increase in SMG&A expenses in 2024 was also due to an increase of $3.9 million in Michpal’s SMG&A, primarily attributable to the first-time inclusion of the SMG&A expenses of Heshev Information Systems (consolidated as of January 2024), Meida Computers Software Solutions (G.D) Ltd (consolidated as of July 2024) and Y-IT Ltd (consolidated as of October 2024) and was in line with the increase in Michpal’s revenues, which grew by 11.7% year over year. Michpal’s 2024 SMG&A expenses amounted to approximately $12.4 million (approximately 28.9% of Michpal’s revenues for the year 2024), compared to approximately $9.3 million (approximately 24.0% of Michpal' revenues for the year 2023).
The increase in our SMG&A expenses was offset in part by: (A) a decrease of $3.0 million recorded in Zap Group’s SMG&A expenses resulting from (i) a decrease of $2.2 million due to a decrease in the number of sales, marketing and administration employees and subcontractors compared to 2023, and (ii) a decrease in Zap Group’s scale of operations in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily resulting from the decrease in the demand for its advertising services mainly resulting from the “Iron Swords War”; and (B) a decrease of $2.3 million in Magic Software’s SMG&A expenses from $85.5 million recorded in 2023 to $83.3 million recorded in 2024, primarily resulting from (i) the reduction in Magic Software’s North American market IT professional services revenues, which led to a corresponding decrease in payroll, commissions, and bonus expenses related to its sales and marketing personnel, as well as a reduction in headcount; and (ii) cost-saving initiatives implemented within the software segment of Magic Software’s European operations. As a percentage of Magic Software’s total revenues, Magic Software’s SMG&A expenses amounted to 15.1% in 2024 compared to 16.0% in 2023.
Consolidated share-based compensation expenses recorded under selling, marketing general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 amounted to $16.2 million and $18.6 million, respectively.
Operating Income. Our operating income increased from $239.4 million in 2023 to $270.5 million in 2024. Operating income in 2024 included a capital gain of $4.1 million recorded following TSG Systems’ initial public offering, or IPO, which concluded in August 2024. As part of the IPO, TSG issued 338,500 new ordinary shares at a price of NIS 183.25 per share, for total gross proceeds of approximately NIS 62 million. The total issuance costs amounted to approximately NIS 5.3 million. As of August 1, 2024, TSG Systems’ shares are traded on the TASE. As a percentage of revenue, our operating income increased from 9.1% in 2023 to 9.8% in 2024. The increase in our operating income during the year ended December 31, 2024 relative to the year ended December 31, 2023 as an absolute amount was attributable to the various gross profit and operating expenses trends described above.
Financial Expenses, net. Financial expenses decreased from $42.1 million in 2023 to $38.1 million in 2024. Financial expenses, net decreased from to $28.3 million in 2023 to $22.1 million in 2024. Financial expenses are influenced by various factors, including: our cash balances; loan balances; outstanding debentures; changes in liabilities related to business combinations; changes in the exchange rate of the NIS against the dollar; changes in the exchange rate of the dollar against the Euro; and changes in the Israeli consumer price index, or CPI.
The decrease in net financial expenses in 2024 was primarily attributable to: (i) a decrease in interest expenses on loans and borrowings from $18.5 million in 2023 to $17.9 million, resulting primarily from a decrease in the level of loans and borrowings and from a continued decrease in interest rate levels in 2024; (ii) a decrease in interest expenses attributed to leases accounted for under IFRS 16, from $7.2 million in 2023 to $6.5 million in 2024; (iii) a decrease in derivatives losses from $3.0 million in 2023 to $0 million in 2024; and (vi) an increase in interest income from deposits, positive foreign exchange differences and other financial income from $13.8 million to $15.9 million, offset, in part, by an increase in bank charges, negative foreign exchange differences and other financial expenses from $8.7 million in 2023 to $9.8 million in 2024.
113
Taxes on Income. Taxes on income increased from $46.1 million in 2023 to $56.7 million in 2024, in line with the increase in our income before taxes. As a percentage of pre-tax income, tax expenses amounted to approximately 22.8% in 2024, compared to 21.8% in 2023.
Share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net. Share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net, increased from $0.8 million in 2023 to $2.1 million in 2024. The increase in our share of profits of companies accounted for at equity was primarily attributable to $1.6 million of profit included in our results of operations for the first time in 2024 related to our 21.45% equity interest investment in an Israel-based private technology company specializing in artificial intelligence-powered product comparison and e-commerce guidance platforms. The investee operates a global portfolio of consumer-oriented websites that provide comprehensive product reviews, side-by-side comparisons, and price tracking functionalities, collectively serving over 40 million monthly users across more than 20 countries.
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests. Net income attributable to non-controlling interests includes the non-controlling interests held by other shareholders in our consolidated companies, which were not wholly owned by Formula during each of the periods indicated. Net income attributable to non-controlling interests increased from $101.7 million in 2023 to $114.1 million in 2024, mainly due to: (i) an increase in Matrix’s net income attributable to its shareholders from $61.1 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2023 to $74.2 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024; (ii) an increase in Sapiens’ net income attributable to its shareholders (when measured in accordance with IFRS) from $63.1 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2023 to $71.5 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024; and (ii) the various gross profit, operating and financial expenses trends described above.
Impact of Inflation and Currency Fluctuations on Results of Operations
Our financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars. However, most of our revenues and expenses from our software services revenue line are denominated in NIS and a substantial portion of our revenues and costs from our proprietary software products and related services revenue line are incurred in other currencies, particularly NIS, Euros, Danish Krone, Swedish Krona, Japanese yen, Indian rupee and the British pound. We also maintain substantial non-U.S. dollar balances of assets, including cash, accounts receivable, and liabilities, including accounts payable, debentures and debt to financial institutions Therefore, fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we do business relative to the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. For financial reporting purposes, we translate all non-U.S. dollar denominated transactions into dollars using the average exchange rate over the period during which the transactions occur, in accordance with IFRS. Therefore, we are exposed to the risk that the devaluation of the NIS relative to the U.S. dollar may reduce the revenue growth rate and profitability for our software services in dollar terms. The average of the daily representative exchange rates of the NIS to the dollar in 2023 and 2024, as reported by the Bank of Israel, were NIS 3.69 per $1 U.S. dollar, and NIS 3.70 per $1 U.S. dollar, respectively. This minor change did not have a material impact on the dollar value of our NIS-based revenues and profitability for our Israeli software services in 2024 relative to 2023.
A significant portion of our revenues from proprietary software products and related services is currently mainly denominated in U.S dollars, Euros, Japanese yen, Danish Krone, Swedish Krona, Indian rupee and the British pound, whereas a substantial portion of our expenses relating to those products, principally salaries and related personnel expenses, are denominated in NIS or U.S dollar. As a result, the devaluation of the Euro, Japanese yen, Danish Krone, Swedish Krona, Indian rupee and the British pound relative to the U.S. dollar (in which our financial results are reported) reduces the revenue growth rate and profitability for our proprietary software products and related services in dollar terms, thereby adversely affecting our operating results. From the perspective of expenses (and contrary to the trend involving software services), the devaluation of the NIS relative to the dollar, decreases the relative value, in U.S. dollars, of the NIS-denominated operating costs related to our proprietary software product revenues. That, therefore, increases our profitability and partially compensates for the negative effect that such a movement would have on our revenues and our profitability from our software services.
Since most of our expenses are incurred in NIS, the dollar cost of our operations also rises as a result of any increase in the rate of inflation in Israel, to the extent that such inflation is not offset, or is only offset on a lagging basis, by the devaluation (if any) of the NIS against the dollar during a relevant period of time. The average Israeli rate of inflation on an annual basis amounted to 5.3%, 3.0% and 3.2% for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024 respectively. In 2023 and to a very minor extent in 2024, the depreciation of the NIS relative to the U.S dollar decreased the U.S. dollar value of our operating expenses incurred in NIS for our operations carried out in Israel. That trend furthered the decrease in those expenses that was caused by the reduced rate of inflation in Israel in 2023 (relative to 2022), while having little impact on the minor increase in those expenses caused by the slight rise in Israeli inflation in 2024 relative to 2023.
An increase in the rate of inflation in Israel may also have a material adverse effect on our financial results by increasing our operational expenses, as certain of our operating lease and rent agreements are denominated in NIS and are generally linked to the Israeli CPI, so to the extent that the Israeli CPI rises, so will our operational expenses.
114
Though, to date, we have not engaged in significant currency hedging transactions, we do periodically engage in certain economic hedging in order to help protect against fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates. Instruments that we use to manage currency exchange risks may include foreign currency forward contracts. The purpose of our foreign currency hedging activities is to reduce our exposure, from the perspective of our profitability, to the risks that arise from the adverse impact that exchange rates bear on our revenues and expenses that are denominated in non-U.S. currencies. Instruments are used selectively to manage risks, but there can be no assurance that we will be fully protected against material foreign currency fluctuations. We do not use these instruments for speculative or trading purposes. In the future, we may enter into more or larger currency hedging transactions to decrease the risk of financial exposure from fluctuations in the exchange rate of the NIS, Euro, Danish Krone, Swedish Krona, Japanese yen or British pound against the U.S dollar, and from increases in the Israeli inflation rate. However, we cannot assure you that these measures will adequately protect us from the adverse effects of those fluctuations.
The following table presents a summary of the most relevant monetary indicators for the reported periods:
| For the year ended December 31, | Inflation rate in Israel | Devaluation (appreciation) of NIS against the US$* | Devaluation (appreciation) of Euro against the US$* | |||||||||
| % | % | % | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 5.3 | % | 4.0 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||||
| 2023 | 3.0 | % | 9.9 | % | (2.7 | )% | ||||||
| 2024 | 3.2 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||
| * | Reflects the change in the daily exchange rate from the start of such year until the end of such year rather than the change in the average daily exchange rate over the course of that year relative to the previous year. |
Effective Corporate Tax Rates in Israel
Tax regulations have a material impact on our business, particularly in Israel where we have our headquarters. The following is a summary of some of the current tax law applicable to companies in Israel, with special reference to its effect on us.
Corporate Tax
Generally, Israeli companies are subject to corporate tax on their taxable income. As of 2018 and thereafter, the corporate tax rate is 23%. However, the effective tax rate payable by a company that derives income from an AE, BE, PFE or a PTE, in each case, as defined and further discussed below, may be considerably lower. See “Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments” in this Item 5.A below. In addition, Israeli companies are currently subject to regular corporate tax rate on their capital gains.
Besides being subject to the general corporate tax rules in Israel, certain of our Israeli subsidiaries have also, from time to time, applied for and received certain grants and tax benefits from, and participate in, programs sponsored by the Government of Israel, as described below.
Taxation of Non-Israeli Subsidiaries Held by an Israeli Parent Company
Non-Israeli subsidiaries of an Israeli parent company are generally subject to tax in their countries of residence under tax laws applicable to them in such countries. Such subsidiaries could also be subject to Israeli corporate tax on their income if they were to be managed and controlled from Israel. In such case, double taxation could ensue unless an applicable tax treaty provides applicable rules for relief from double taxation or such relief is available under internal law.
An Israeli parent company may also be required to include in its income on a current basis, as a deemed dividend, certain income derived by its subsidiaries under the Israeli Controlled Foreign Corporation rules, or CFC, regardless of whether such income is distributed or not. Under these rules, a non-Israeli subsidiary is considered to be a CFC, if, among other things, (i) a majority of the subsidiary’s means of control are held by Israeli residents, (ii) most of its revenues or income is passive (such as interest, dividends, royalties, rental income or income from capital gains) and (iii) such income is taxed at a rate that does not exceed 15%. An Israeli parent company that is subject to Israeli taxes on such deemed dividend income, may generally receive a credit for foreign taxes paid by its subsidiaries in their country of residence and for deemed foreign taxes to be withheld upon the actual distribution of such income.
Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 5729-1969
The Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 5729-1969 (the “Industry Encouragement Law”) provides several tax benefits for an “Industrial Company.” Pursuant to the Industry Encouragement Law, a company qualifies as an Industrial Company if it is an Israeli resident company which was incorporated in Israel and at least 90% of its income in any tax year (other than income from certain government loans) is generated from an “Industrial Enterprise” that it owns and is located in Israel or in the “Area,” in accordance with the definition under Section 3A of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance (New Version) 1961, or the Ordinance. An “Industrial Enterprise” is defined as an enterprise which is held by an Industrial Company whose major activity, in a given tax year, is industrial production.
115
An Industrial Company is entitled to certain tax benefits, including:
| ■ | Amortization of the cost of the purchases of patents, or the right to use a patent or know-how that were purchased in good faith and used for the development or promotion of the Industrial Enterprise, over an eight-year period commencing on the year in which such rights were first exercised; |
| ■ | the right to elect, under certain conditions, to file a consolidated tax return together with Israeli Industrial Companies controlled by it; and |
| ■ | Expenses related to a public offering are deductible in equal amounts over three years beginning from the year of the offering. |
Eligibility for benefits under the Industry Encouragement Law is not subject to receipt of prior approval from any governmental authority.
We believe that certain of our Israeli subsidiaries and affiliate currently qualify as Industrial Companies within the definition under the Industry Encouragement Law. We cannot assure you that they will continue to qualify as Industrial Companies or that the benefits described above will be available in the future.
Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959
The Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959, or the Investment Law, provides certain incentives for capital investments in a production facility (or other eligible assets). Generally, an investment program that is implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Law, referred to as an Approved Enterprise, or AE, a Benefitted Enterprise, or BE, or a Preferred Enterprise, or PFE, or a Special Preferred Enterprise, or “SPFE”, or a Preferred Technological Enterprise, or PTE, or a Special Preferred Technological Enterprise, or SPTE is entitled to benefits as discussed below. These benefits may include cash grants from the Israeli government and tax benefits, based upon, among other things, the geographic location in Israel of the facility in which the investment is made. In order to qualify for these incentives, an AE, BE, PFE, SPFE PTE or SPTE is required to comply with the requirements of the Investment Law.
The Investment Law has been amended several times over the recent years, with the three most significant changes effective as of April 1, 2005 (referred to as the 2005 Amendment), as of January 1, 2011 (referred to as the 2011 Amendment) and as of January 1, 2017 (referred to as the 2017 Amendment). Pursuant to the 2005 Amendment, tax benefits granted in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Law prior to its revision by the 2005 Amendment remain in force but any benefits granted subsequently are subject to the provisions of the amended Investment Law. Similarly, the 2011 Amendment introduced new benefits instead of the benefits granted in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Law prior to the 2011 Amendment. However, companies entitled to benefits under the Investment Law as in effect up to January 1, 2011 were entitled to choose to continue to enjoy such benefits, provided that certain conditions are met, or elect instead, irrevocably, to forego such benefits and elect the benefits of the 2011 Amendment. The 2017 Amendment introduces new benefits for Technological Enterprises, alongside the existing tax benefits.
Tax benefits under the 2011 Amendment that became effective on January 1, 2011.
The 2011 Amendment canceled the availability of the benefits granted in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Law prior to 2011 and, instead, introduced new benefits for income generated by a “Preferred Company” through its PFE (as such terms are defined in the Investment Law) as of January 1, 2011. A Preferred Company is defined as either (i) a company incorporated in Israel which is not wholly owned by a governmental entity or (ii) a limited partnership that (a) was registered under the Israeli Partnerships Ordinance and (b) all of its limited partners are companies incorporated in Israel, but not all of them are governmental entities; which has, among other things, PFE status and is controlled and managed from Israel. Pursuant to the 2011 Amendment, a Preferred Company is entitled to a reduced corporate tax rate of 15% with respect to its preferred income, or PFI, attributed to its PFE in 2011 and 2012, unless the PFE is located in a certain development zone, in which case the rate will be 10%. Such corporate tax rate was reduced to 12.5% and 7%, respectively, in 2013 and was increased to 16% and 9%, respectively, in 2014 until 2016. Pursuant to the 2017 Amendment, in 2017 and thereafter, the corporate tax rate for a PFE that is located in a specified development zone was decreased to 7.5%, while the reduced corporate tax rate for other development zones remains 16%. Income derived by a Preferred Company from a Special Preferred Enterprise, or SPFE (as such term is defined in the Investment Law) would be entitled, during a benefits period of 10 years, to further reduced tax rates of 8%, or 5% if the SPFE is located in a certain development zone. As of January 1, 2017, the definition for SPFE includes less stringent conditions.
The classification of income generated from the provision of usage rights in know-how or software that were developed in a PFE, as well as royalty income received with respect to such usage, is subject, as PFE income, to the issuance of a pre-ruling from the Israel Tax Authority, or ITA, that stipulates that such income is associated with the productive activity of the PFE in Israel.
Dividends paid to Israeli shareholders out of PFI attributed to a PFE or to a Special PFE are generally subject to withholding tax at source at the rate of 20%(in case of non-Israeli residents - subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the ITA allowing for a reduced tax rate, 20%, or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty). However, if such dividends are paid to an Israeli company, no tax is required to be withheld (although, if such dividends are subsequently distributed to individuals or a non-Israeli company the aforesaid will apply).
116
Sapiens has received a new tax ruling from the ITA valid until December 31, 2024, according to which dividends paid to Israeli shareholders who are individuals and to non-Israeli shareholders (individuals and corporations) will be subject to withholding tax at source at the rate of 25% and in the case of Israeli resident corporations— 0%, regardless of the source of the dividends. We cannot guarantee that the tax ruling will be extended further beyond December 31, 2024.
On November 15, 2021, the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Achieving Budget Targets for the 2021 and 2022 Budget Years), 2021, which we refer to as the Economic Efficiency Law, was enacted. This law established a temporary order, or the Temporary Order, allowing Israeli companies to release tax-exempt earnings, which we refer to as trapped earnings or accumulated earnings, that had accumulated until December 31, 2020, through a mechanism established for a reduced corporate income tax rate applicable to those earnings. In addition to reducing the corporate income tax (or CIT) rate, the Economic Efficiency Law amended Article 74 of the Investment Law, whereby effective from August 15, 2021, for any dividend distribution (including a dividend specified in Article 51B of the Investment Law) by a company which has trapped earnings, there is a requirement to allocate a portion of that distribution to the trapped earnings. Under the Temporary Order, the reduction of CIT applies to earnings that are released (with no requirement for an actual distribution) within a period of one year from the date of enactment of the Temporary Order. The reduction in the CIT is dependent on the proportion of the trapped earnings that are released relative to the total trapped earnings, and on the foreign investment percentage in the years the earnings were generated. Consequently, the larger the proportion of the trapped earnings that are released, the lower the tax in respect of the distribution. The minimum tax rate is 6%. Further, a company that elects to pay a reduced CIT is required to invest in its industrial enterprise a designated amount in accordance with the Economic Efficiency Law within a period of five years commencing from the tax year in which the election is made. The designated investment should be utilized for the acquisition of production assets, and/or investments in research and development and/or compensation to additional new employees.
In 2022, Sapiens elected to benefit from the Temporary Order and pay the reduced CIT as per the provisions of the Economic Efficiency Law in respect of its total accumulated tax-exempt earnings amounting to NIS 109 million (approximately $35.0 million), and accordingly our deferred tax liability includes an amount of $3.5 million. In 2022, the Sapiens filed its application for the Temporary Order and paid the required amount to the Israeli tax authority.
In November 2022, Magic Software also elected to benefit from the Temporary Order and filed its application for the Temporary Order and paid the required reduced CIT as per the provisions of the Economic Efficiency Law in respect of its total accumulated tax-exempt earnings amounting to NIS 25.0 million (approximately $7.1 million), and accordingly recognized a tax liability of NIS 2.5 million (approximately $0.7 million).
As of December 31, 2022 all of Sapiens’ and Magic Software’s trapped earnings were released.
New Tax benefits under the 2017 Amendment that became effective on January 1, 2017
The 2017 Amendment provides new tax benefits for two types of Technology Enterprises, as described below, and is in addition to the other existing tax beneficial programs under the Investment Law.
The 2017 Amendment provides that a technology company satisfying certain conditions will qualify as a PTE, and will thereby enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 12% on income that qualifies as Preferred Technology Income, or PTI, as defined in the Investment Law. The tax rate is further reduced to 7.5% for a PTE located in development zone “A”. In addition, a Preferred Technology Company will enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 12% on capital gain derived from the sale of certain Benefited Intangible Assets (as defined in the Investment Law). to a related foreign company if the “Benefitted Intangible Assets” (as defined under the Investment Law) were acquired from a foreign company on or after January 1, 2017 for at least NIS 200 million, and the sale receives prior approval from the Israeli Innovation Authority (“IIA”).
The 2017 Amendment further provides that a technology company satisfying certain conditions will qualify as a SPTE (an enterprise for which, among others, total consolidated revenues of its parent company and all subsidiaries is at least NIS 10 billion) and will thereby enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 6% on PTI regardless of the company’s geographic location within Israel. In addition, a SPTE will enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 6% on capital gain derived from the sale of certain “Benefited Intangible Assets” to a related foreign company if the Benefited Intangible Assets were either developed by the Special Preferred Technology Enterprise or acquired from a foreign company on or after January 1, 2017, and the sale received prior approval from IIA. A SPTE that acquires Benefitted Intangible Assets from a foreign company for more than NIS 500 million will be eligible for these benefits for at least ten years, subject to certain approvals as specified in the Investment Law.
117
We examined the impact of the 2017 Amendment and the degree to which certain of our Israeli subsidiaries will qualify as a PTE or SPTE, and the amount of PTI that we may have, or other benefits that we may receive, from the 2017 Amendment. Beginning in 2017, part of our Group’s taxable income with respect to certain operations under certain of our Israeli subsidiaries are entitled to a preferred 12% tax rate under the 2017 Amendment. In addition, from 2019 onwards, certain of our Israeli subsidiaries are considered a SPTE and as such are entitled to a SPTE tax rate of 6%, as described above.
Tax Benefits and grants for Research and Development
Israeli tax law allows, under certain conditions, a tax deduction for research and development expenditures, including capital expenditures, for the year in which they are incurred. Such expenditures must relate to scientific research and development projects and must be approved by the relevant Israeli government ministry, determined by the field of research. Furthermore, the research and development must be for the promotion of the company’s business and carried out by or on behalf of the company seeking such tax deduction. However, the amount of such deductible expenses is reduced by the sum of any funds received through government grants for the finance of such scientific research and development projects. Expenditures not so approved by the relevant Israeli government ministry, but otherwise qualifying for deduction, are deductible over a three-year period.
Effect of Tax Regulations on our Operating Results
Global Minimum Tax Pillar Two
In December 2022, the European Council adopted Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523, which ensures a global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the EU, and introduced within the EU the solutions previously formulated by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and accepted by more than 140 countries under the BEPS 2.0 (Base Erosion Profit Shifting) project.
The Global Minimum Tax rules (the so-called Pillar Two) impose new tax and reporting obligations on companies which belong to capital groups (Polish and multinational) with revenues of at least EUR 750 million, and, therefore, they apply to the Asseco Group (and to our company as a member of the Asseco Group). The purpose of Pillar Two is to equalize taxation rules and it is implemented by imposing a minimum tax of 15% on qualifying income of capital groups. The effective tax rate, not the nominal rate, will be taken into account, and the tax rate will be calculated on a country-by-country (jurisdiction) basis, i.e., on an aggregate basis for all group companies in each country.
In Israel, the regulations of Pillar Two will become effective beginning on January 1, 2026. Certain countries in which we operate have enacted such legislation while other countries are in the process of doing so; however, this did not have a material effect on our income tax provision for the 2024 fiscal year.
| B. | Liquidity and Capital Resources |
Since inception, we have financed our growth and business primarily through cash provided by operations and through public debt and equity offerings, as well as through private and public debt and equity offerings of our subsidiaries. In addition, we finance our business operations through short-term and long-term loans and borrowings available under our credit facilities.
Current Outlook
We had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (including marketable securities) of $528.2 million and $563.2 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2024, respectively. At December 31, 2023 and 2024, we had indebtedness to banks and others, including debentures, of $541.3 million and $479.4 million, respectively, of which $218.9 million and $228.6 million were current liabilities and $322.4 million and $250.8 million were long-term liabilities as of those respective dates. Included in the balance of our indebtedness to banks and others as of December 31, 2024, Formula had (on a stand-alone basis) indebtedness of $90.5 million and $40.8 million, in the aggregate, outstanding under Formula’s Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures, respectively, which Formula sold in public offerings in Israel in March 2019 (extended in April 2021 and August 2022), and September 2024, respectively, in each case, as described below.
We had cash and cash equivalents and short term deposits (including marketable securities) that were held outside of Israel and that would have been subject to income taxes if distributed as a dividend as of December 31, 2023 and 2024 in amounts of $91.9 million and $89.5 million, respectively.
118
Sources of Financing
Series C Secured Debenture Financings
On March 31, 2019, Formula consummated a public offering in Israel of a new series of secured debentures—Series C Secured Debentures— in an aggregate NIS 300.0 million par value amount, at a price of NIS 1,000 for each unit of NIS 1,000 principal amount. The aggregate gross proceeds from the public offering totaled NIS 300.0 million (approximately $82.6 million) excluding issuance costs of $0.9 million. The Series C Secured Debentures are secured by liens on the shares of Formula’s subsidiaries and are listed for trading only on the TASE. Each Series C Secured Debenture unit bears interest at a fixed annual rate equal to 2.29%, which interest will be paid out on a semi-annual basis. The principal amount of the Series C Debentures will be payable by Formula in seven annual installments from December 1, 2020 through December 1, 2026, the first five of which will each constitute 11% of the principal, and the final two of which will each constitute 22.5% of the principal.
April 2021 Private Placement
On April 12, 2021, Formula consummated a private placement to qualified investors in Israel of an aggregate NIS 160 million (approximately $48.6 million) principal amount of its non-convertible Series C Secured Debentures at a price of NIS 1,037 for each NIS 1,000 principal amount. The total aggregate gross proceeds received by Formula from the investors was NIS 165.92 million (approximately $50.4 million), out of which NIS 1.7 million was attributed to interest payable (approximately $0.5 million). Debt premium of NIS 4.4 million (approximately $1.0 million) net of issuance costs of NIS 0.9 million (approximately $0.3 million) were allocated to the Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures and are amortized as financial income over the remaining term of Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures due in 2026.
The additional debentures were sold by means of an increase in the outstanding principal amount of Series C Secured Debentures. As a result of this private placement, the total outstanding principal amount of the Series C Debentures increased to approximately NIS 427 million. The Series C Secured Debentures sold in the private placement are subject to the terms of the deed of trust, entered into in March 2019, by and between Formula, as the issuer of the debentures, and Reznick Paz Nevo Trusts Ltd., as trustee on behalf of the debenture holders.
The terms of the Series C Debentures sold in the April 2021 private placement were identical in all respects to those of the Series C Debentures sold in Formula’s March 2019 public offering.
August 2022 Private Placement
On August 22, 2022, Formula entered into agreements with qualified investors in Israel for the private placement to those investors of an additional aggregate of NIS 200 million principal amount of Formula’s Series C Secured Debentures, at a price of NIS 975 for each NIS 1,000 principal amount. The total aggregate gross proceeds received by Formula from the investors was NIS 195 million (of which NIS 1.1 million was attributed to interest payable, or approximately $0.3 million). The additional debentures were sold by means of an increase in the outstanding principal amount of Series C Secured Debentures.
Series D Secured Debenture Financing
On September 17 and 19, 2024, Formula consummated a public offering in Israel of a new series of secured debentures—Series D Secured Debentures— in an aggregate NIS 150.0 million par value amount, at a price of NIS 1,000 for each unit of NIS 1,000 principal amount. The aggregate gross proceeds from the public offering totaled NIS 150.0 million (approximately $39.8 million) excluding issuance costs of NIS 2.0 million (approximately $0.5 million). The Series D Secured Debentures are secured by liens on the shares of Formula’s subsidiaries and are listed for trading only on the TASE. Each Series D Secured Debenture unit bears interest at a fixed annual rate equal to 5.68%, which interest will be paid out on a semi-annual basis, beginning on December 1, 2024 and then on June 1 and December 1 of each of 2025 through 2034. The principal amount of the Series D Secured Debentures will be payable by Formula in eight annual installments on December 1 of each of 2027 through 2034, the first seven of which will each constitute 12% of the principal, and the eighth and final of which will constitute the remaining 16% of the principal.
The total principal amount of all debentures— including Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures— issued by Formula that remain outstanding as of March 31, 2025 constituted NIS 483.2 million (approximately $132.5 million).
119
General Terms of Outstanding Debentures
The Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures contain, in addition to standard terms and obligations, the following obligations on our part:
| ● | a negative pledge, subject to certain exceptions; |
| ● | a covenant not to distribute dividends unless: (i) shareholders’ equity (not including minority interests) is at least $370 million (for the Series D Secured Debentures) or $290 million (for the Series C Secured Debentures); (ii) Formula’s consolidated net financial indebtedness (financial indebtedness net of cash, marketable securities, deposits and other liquid financial instruments) does not exceed 50% (for each of the Series D Secured Debentures and the Series C Secured Debentures) of net CAP (which is defined as financial indebtedness, net, plus shareholders equity); (iii) the amount of the distributions (including, in the case of the Series D Secured Debentures, any previous distribution starting from January 1, 2022 and the case of the Series C Secured Debentures, any previous distribution starting from January 1, 2016) does not exceed that aggregated amount of the profit accrued for, in the case of the Series D Secured Debentures, the year 2021 and 75% of profits accrued from January 1, 2022 until the distribution, and in the case of the Series C Secured Debentures, the year 2015 and 75% of profits accrued from January 1, 2016 until the distribution; (iv) no event of default shall have occurred; and (v) no material breach of obligations under the debentures shall have occurred; and |
| ● | Financial covenants, including: (i) the equity attributable to the shareholders of Formula, as reported in Formula’s annual or quarterly financial statements, will not be less than $215 million (for the Series C Secured Debentures) or $325 million (for the Series D Secured Debentures); (ii) Formula’s consolidated net financial indebtedness (financial indebtedness net of cash, marketable securities, deposits and other liquid financial instruments) shall not exceed 65% of net CAP (which is defined as financial indebtedness, net, plus shareholders equity); (iii) Formula’s consolidated net financial indebtedness shall not exceed five times EBITDA (which is defined as the consolidated net profit plus taxes, net financing expenses, depreciation and amortization and without expenses for employee stock option, expenses for transactions and one-time income/expenses) (in the case of the Series D Secured Debentures, for two consecutive quarters); and (iv) in the case of the Series C Secured Debentures, at all times, Formula’s cash balance will not be less than the annual interest payment (compounded) for the unpaid principal amount of the Series C Secured Debentures. |
We have agreed to standard events of default under the Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures, together with the following additional events of default due to any of the following:
| ● | cross default initiated in relation to the other series of debentures or other indebtedness (other than non-recourse debt) over NIS 75 million ($20.6 million as of December 31, 2024) in the case of the Series C Secured Debentures or over NIS 250 million ($69.4 million as of December 31, 2024) in the case of the Series D Secured Debentures; |
| ● | suspension of trading of the debentures on the TASE over a period of 60 days; |
| ● | failure to have the debentures rated over a period of 60 days; |
| ● | if the rating of the debentures is less than BBB- by Standard and Poors Maalot or equivalent rating of other rating agencies; |
| ● | if there is a change in control without consent of the rating agency; |
| ● | if Formula fails to provide additional security when the loan-to-value of the securities securing Series C Secured Debentures or Series D Secured Debentures (as applicable) falls below the required ratio; |
| ● | the existence of a real concern that Formula will not meet its material undertakings towards the debenture holders; |
| ● | the inclusion in Formula’s financial statements of a note regarding the existence of significant doubt as to Formula’s ability to continue as a going concern; |
| ● | breach of Formula’s undertakings regarding the issuance of additional debentures; |
| ● | Formula’s failure to continue to control any of its subsidiaries; and |
| ● | failure to comply with the negative pledge covenant. |
120
Subsidiary and Affiliate Financing Activities
From time to time, our subsidiaries and affiliated companies also maintain credit facilities with banks and other financial institutions and issue debt instruments such as debentures in accordance with their cash requirements. These credit facilities and debentures include, inter alia, certain standard events of defaults related to our subsidiaries’ operations, which restrict their ability to: (i) undergo a change of control, (ii) distribute dividends, (iii) incur debt or apply a floating charge on their assets, or (iv) undergo an asset sale or other change that would result in a fundamental change in their operations. The subsidiaries’ and affiliated companies’ indebtedness also requires that they comply with certain financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios related to their shareholders’ equity, total rate of debt and liabilities, minimum outstanding balance of total cash and short-term investments and operating results that are customary for companies of comparable size and risk level. Some of our subsidiaries’ assets are pledged to the lender banks and debenture holders. If we or any of our subsidiaries do not meet the covenants specified in our credit agreements or indentures (or equivalent agreement with the debenture holders), and a waiver with respect to the fulfillment of such covenants has not been received from the lender bank or representative of the debenture holders, the lender bank or debenture holders (via the action of their representative) may foreclose on the pledged assets to satisfy a debt.
Currently, Matrix and its subsidiaries, Sapiens and its subsidiaries, Magic Software and its subsidiaries, Zap Group and its subsidiaries, Michpal and its subsidiaries and Formula have material credit facilities and/or debentures outstanding. The long-term debt obligations of Matrix for NIS-denominated loans bear fixed interest at an average annual rate of 1.4%-3.98% (including Matrix’s Series B Debentures issued in September 2022 and extended in December 2022). The long-term debt obligations of Magic Software for NIS-denominated loans bear floating interest at an annual rate between the Israeli prime interest rate +0.25% and the Israeli prime interest rate +0.95%. The long-term debt obligations of Magic Software for U.S. dollar- denominated loans bear floating interest at a rate between SOFR + 2.1% and SOFR + 3.38%. The long-term debt obligations of Sapiens bear fixed interest at an annual rate of 3.37%. These credit facilities and/or debentures expire over a period of time that ranges from one to seven years. The long-term debt obligations of Zap Group for NIS-denominated loans bear floating interest in NIS at a rate of the Israeli prime interest rate +0.84%. The long-term debt obligations of Michpal for NIS-denominated loans bear floating interest at a rate betwem the Israeli prime interest rate +0.7% and the Israeli prime interest rate +0.92%.
As of December 31, 2024, Matrix had aggregate short-term obligations to banks and others (excluding current maturities of debentures) of NIS 338.6 million (approximately $92.9 million) and aggregate long-term obligations to banks and others of NIS 19.7 million (approximately $5.4 million) under its credit facilities. As of December 31, 2024, Magic Software had aggregate short-term obligations to banks and others of $23.2 million and aggregate long-term obligations to banks and others of $36.1 million under its credit facilities. As of December 31, 2024, Zap Group had aggregate short-term obligations to banks and others of NIS 11.6 million (approximately $3.2 million) and aggregate long-term obligations to banks and others of NIS 22.1 million (approximately $6.0 million) under its credit facilities. As of December 31, 2024, Michpal had aggregate short-term obligations to banks and others of NIS 21.2 million (approximately $5.8 million) and aggregate long-term obligations to banks and others of NIS 43.7 million (approximately $12.0 million) under its credit facilities. During the second half of 2022, in an effort to hedge its exposure to the effects of the increase in interest rates, Matrix effected two Series B Debenture issuances, yielding a net amount (minus issuance expenses) of approximately NIS 471.4 million (approximately $140.4). The principal due under the Matrix Series B Debentures is payable in thirteen (13) semi-annual installments, each equal to approximately 7.14% of the aggregate principal amount (or approximately NIS 33,959) on February 1st and on August 1st of each of the years 2023 through 2029, with the last payment equal to 7.18% of the aggregate principal amount (or approximately NIS 34,148) to be paid on February 1, 2030. The outstanding principal amount under the Matrix Series B Debentures bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.1% per annum (subject to adjustments based on the credit rating of the debentures), payable on February 1st and August 1st of each of the years 2023 through 2030.
In September 2017, Sapiens issued NIS 280 million (approximately $78.3 million, net of $0.96 million of debt discount and issuance costs) principal amount of Series B unsecured, non-convertible debentures, in a public offering and private placement in Israel. Proceeds of such offering were utilized to repay the entire outstanding loan amount (including accrued interest) under a $40 million credit agreement to which Sapiens had been party with HSBC Bank USA, National Association as financing for Sapiens’ acquisition of StoneRiver. The outstanding principal amount of the Sapiens Series B debentures is linked to the US dollar and bears interest at an annual rate of 3.37%, to be paid on a semi-annual basis (on January 1 and July 1 of 2018 through 2025, with one final interest payment on January 1, 2026). The principal of the Sapiens Series B debentures is payable in eight equal annual payments beginning on January 1, 2019, with the final payment due on January 1, 2026. The first seven principal installments for the September 2017 Series B Debentures, in amounts of $9.9 million each, were paid on January 1, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.
In June 2020, Sapiens issued additional Series B Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS 210 million (approximately $60.4 million) through a public offering in Israel. The gross proceeds received for the issuance of Sapiens’ Series B Debentures in June 2020 were NIS 210.8 million (approximately $60.6 million), out of which approximately NIS 3.0 million was attributed to interest payable (approximately $0.9 million). Debt discount of NIS 2.2 million (approximately $0.6 million) and issuance costs of NIS 2.3 million (approximately $0.7 million) were allocated to Sapiens’ Series B Debentures and are amortized as financial expenses over the remaining term of the Sapiens Series B Debentures due in 2026. The first five principal payments of $9.9 million each for the June 2020 Series B Debentures were made on January 1, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.
121
As of March 1, 2025, there is NIS 70 million (approximately $19.5 million) principal amount of Sapiens’ Series B Debentures outstanding, all of which trade on the TASE in units of NIS 1,000 principal amount each.
In the deed of trust entered into by Sapiens with the trustee for the holders of its Series B Debentures, Sapiens undertook to maintain a number of conditions and limitations on the manner in which it can operate its business, including limitations on its ability to undergo a change of control, distribute dividends, incur a floating charge on its assets, or undergo an asset sale or other change that results in a fundamental change in its operations. The deed of trust also requires Sapiens to comply with certain financial covenants, including maintenance of a minimum shareholders’ equity level and a maximum ratio of financial indebtedness to shareholders’ equity, at levels that are customary for companies of comparable size. The deed of trust furthermore provides for an upwards adjustment in the interest rate payable under the debentures in the event that the debentures’ rating is downgraded below a certain level. A breach of the financial covenants for more than two successive quarters or a substantial downgrade in the rating of the debentures (below BBB-) could result in the acceleration of Sapiens’ obligation to repay the debentures.
As of the date of the financial statements included in this annual report, each of Formula, Sapiens, Magic Software, Zap Group, Michpal and Matrix was in compliance with each of its respective financial covenants.
We believe that our current cash reserves, together with cash that may be distributed to us from the ongoing operations of our subsidiaries and any credit that we may choose to draw upon that is available under our (and our subsidiaries’ and affiliated company’s) existing credit facilities should be sufficient for our present working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months at our current level of operations. We may consider in the future additional equity issuances, debt issuances or borrowings from banks if necessary to meet cash needs for our growth, including if needed to consummate one or more acquisitions for consideration consisting of all or a substantial portion of our available cash. Should we require additional financing in the future, we cannot assure you that such financing will be available on favorable terms or at all.
Credit Ratings
In April 2021, following Formula’s consummation of a private placement to qualified investors in Israel of additional Series C Secured Debentures, Formula reported publicly to the TASE and Israeli Securities Authority that Midroog (established in affiliation with the worldwide rating company, Moody’s Corporation which maintains a 51% share capital interest) maintained the then-current credit rating of Aa3.il with stable outlook for Formula’s then-current series of secured debentures (Series A Secured Debentures and Series C Secured Debentures), which it affirmed in December 2024 with respect to Formula’s current outstanding series of secured debentures (Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures).
In connection with its August 2022 private placement of additional Series C Secured Debentures, on August 22, 2022, Formula publicized an updated rating report published by Standard & Poor’s Maalot, or S&P (a subsidiary of S&P Global), which S&P last affirmed in August 2024 with respect to Formula and its two then-outstanding series of debentures. In that last report, S&P assigned a rating of ilAA- for both the Series A Secured Debentures and Series C Secured Debentures, and a rating of ilAA-/stable for Formula itself.
In connection with Sapiens’ offering of its Series B Debentures, Sapiens received from S&P a corporate credit rating and a rating for the Series B Debentures, which S&P affirmed, as of July 2018 and 2019, May 2020 and July 2021, as ilA+, with stable outlook. On June 28, 2022, S&P upgraded the rating for Sapiens’ Series B Debentures from “ilA+” to “ilAA-” (on local scaling), with a stable outlook, which it last affirmed in July 2024.
In connection with Matrix’s August 2022 offering of its Series B Debentures (then extended in December 2022 in a private placement), Matrix received from Midroog a corporate credit rating and a rating for the Series B Debentures of ilAa3.il, with stable outlook, each of which was affirmed by Midroog as of March 2025.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash flow provided by our operating activities increased from $295.0 million in 2023 to $324.5 million in 2024, mainly resulting from: (i) an increase in Matrix’s cash provided by operating activities from NIS 496.2 million (approximately $134.5 million) in 2023 to NIS 619.2 million (approximately $167.4 million) in 2024; (ii) an increase in Sapiens’ cash provided by operating activities from $89.6 million in 2023 to $91.9 million in 2024 (when measured in accordance with IFRS; (iii) an increase in Magic Software’s cash provided by operating activities from $69.0 million to $74.8 million; and (iv) an increase in Michpal’s cash provided by operating activities from $6.0 million to $12.4 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2024 consisted primarily of the cash generated by our subsidiaries’ ongoing operating activities and of net income stemming therefrom, as adjusted for non-cash activity, including changes in operating assets and liabilities. The material upwards adjustments in cash flow reflecting non-cash activity included adjustments due to: (i) depreciation and amortization of capitalized research and development assets, other intangible assets (mainly customer relations), property, plants and equipment and operating right-of-use assets in an aggregate amount of $115.5 million; (ii) an increase in trade payables in an amount of $40.0 million; (iii) share-based compensation expenses in an amount of $16.2 million; (v) an increase in deferred revenues in an amount of $7.4 million; (vi) an increase in other accounts payable and employees and payroll accrual in an amount of $44.7 million; and (vii) a change in inventories in an amount of $11.7 million, offset in part by: (a) a change in deferred taxes, net in an amount of $12.4 million; (b) cash paid in respect of acquisitions of activities in an amount of $0.9 million; (c) change in liability in respect of business combinations in an amount of $1.7 million; (d) share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net in an amount of $2.1 million; (e) capital gain resulting from TSG Systems’ IPO in an amount of $4.1 million; and (f) an increase in trade receivables in an amount of $81.2 million.
122
Cash flow provided by operating activities in 2023 was primarily comprised of NIS 619.2 million (approximately $167.4 million) provided by Matrix, $91.9 million provided by Sapiens (when measured in accordance with IFRS), $74.8 million provided by Magic Software, $12.4 million provided by Michpal, $2.3 million provided by Shamrad, $1.8 million provided by Insync, and approximately $1.6 million provided by Ofek and Hashahar Telecom, offset, in part, by $2.3 million used by Zap Group and $6.6 million used by Formula.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2023 consisted primarily of the cash generated by our subsidiaries’ ongoing operating activities and of net income stemming therefrom, as adjusted for non-cash activity, including changes in operating assets and liabilities. The material upwards adjustments in cash flow reflecting non-cash activity included adjustments due to: (i) depreciation and amortization of capitalized research and development assets, other intangible assets (mainly customer relations), property, plants and equipment and operating right-of-use assets in an aggregate amount of $121.8 million; (ii) an increase in trade payables in an amount of $18.7 million; (iii) share-based compensation expenses in an amount of $18.6 million; (iv) an increase in deferred revenues in an amount of $9.7 million and (v) a decrease in other current and long-term accounts receivable in an amount of $6.6 million, offset in part by: (a) a changes in deferred taxes, net in an amount of $8.3 million; (b) cash paid in respect of acquisition activities in an amount of $6.6 million; (c) change in liability in respect of business combinations in an amount of $2.1 million; and (d) an increase in trade receivables in an amount of $3.4 million.
Cash Used by Financing Activities
Cash flow used by financing activities was $185.0 million in 2024, compared to cash flow used by financing activities in an amount of $243.2 million in 2023, mainly reflecting the cumulative effect of the following financing-related transactions that occurred over the course of those years:
Year Ended December 31, 2024
In 2024, Magic Software declared cash dividends to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of approximately $21.6 million (out of which $11.6 million were paid on January 8, 2025) of which $11.51 million was allocated to non-controlling interests (of which $6.2 million was paid on January 8, 2025). In addition, in March 2025, upon the publication of its results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024, Magic Software announced an additional dividend distribution in an aggregate amount of approximately $16.1 million to be paid during May 2025, of which $8.6 million was to be paid to non-controlling interests.
In 2024, Matrix declared cash dividends to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of approximately NIS 232.5 million (approximately $63.1 million, based on the exchange rate as of the payment date of each respective dividend), of which NIS 120.4 million (approximately $32.7 million) was paid to non-controlling interests. In addition, in March 2025, upon the publication of its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, Matrix announced an additional dividend distribution in an aggregate amount of approximately NIS 52.2 million (approximately $13.9 million), of which NIS 27.1 million (approximately $7.2 million) was paid to non-controlling interests on April 8, 2025.
In 2024, Sapiens declared cash dividends to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of approximately $31.8 million, based on its 2023 second-half results and 2024 first-half results, of which $18.0 million was paid to non-controlling interests. In addition, in March 2025, upon the publication of its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, Sapiens announced an additional dividend distribution (semi-annual, plus special) in an aggregate amount of approximately $36.9 million, of which $20.8 million was paid to non-controlling interests on April 16, 2025.
Overall, net cash used by financing activities in 2024 was attributable to: (i) dividends paid to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries in an amount of $66.3 million; (ii) dividends paid to Formula’s shareholders in an amount of $18.8 million; (iii) repayment of long-term loans from banks and others in an amount of $93.3 million; (iv) repayment of debentures in an amount of $69.3 million; (v) repayment of lease liabilities in an amount of $50.1 million; (vi) purchase of non-controlling interests in an amount of $4.9 million; (vii) a decrease in short-term bank credit, net in an amount of $4.6 million; and (viii) cash paid due to exercise of put option by non-controlling interests in an amount of $0.1 million, offset, in part, by: (a) $63.3 million of cash provided by long-term loans received from banks and others; and (b) $67.1 million of cash provided by the issuance of debentures.
Year Ended December 31, 2023
In 2023, Magic Software declared cash dividends to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of approximately $30.8 million, of which $16.6 million were paid to non-controlling interests.
In 2023, Matrix declared cash dividends to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of approximately NIS 126.4 million (approximately $34.3 million, based on the average exchange rate for the year 2023), of which NIS 65.5 million (approximately $17.8 million) was paid to non-controlling interests. In addition, in March 2024, upon the publication of its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, Matrix announced an additional dividend distribution in an aggregate amount of approximately NIS 80.7 million (approximately $21.7 million) of which NIS 41.8 million (approximately $11.2 million) was paid to non-controlling interests.
In 2023, Sapiens declared cash dividends to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of approximately or $28.1 million, of which $15.7 million were paid to non-controlling interests. In addition, in March 2024, upon the publication of its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, Sapiens announced an additional dividend distribution in an aggregate amount of approximately $15.6 million of which $8.8 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
123
Overall, net cash used by financing activities in 2023 was attributable to: (i) dividends paid to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries in an amount of $62.5 million; (ii) dividends paid to Formula’s shareholders in an amount of $9.9 million; (iii) repayment of long-term loans from banks and others in an amount of $82.9 million; (iv) repayment of debentures in an amount of $60.4 million; (v) repayment of lease liabilities in an amount of $55.1 million; (vi) purchase of non-controlling interests in an amount of $2.7 million; (vii) a decrease in short-term bank credit, net in an amount of $9.5 million and cash paid due to exercise of put option by non-controlling interests in an amount of $13.2 million, offset in part by: (a) $55.6 million of cash received from long-term loans from banks and others; and (b) $4.8 million provided by the exercise of employees’ stock options in subsidiaries.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in our investing activities was $78.2 million in 2024 compared to $139.2 million in 2023.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2024 was attributable to: (i) expenditures (net of cash acquired) with respect to business acquisitions in an aggregate amount of $50.2 million; (ii) purchase of property and equipment and intangible assets in an amount of $17.3 million; (iii) purchase of other investments in an amount of $15.5 million; (iv) capitalization of software development and other costs in an amount of $11.6 million; (v) payment to former shareholders of a consolidated company in an amount of $6.1 million; and (vi) payments in conjunction with deferred payments and contingent liabilities related to business combinations in an amount of $8.4 million. This cash use was offset in part by the following cash amounts provided by investing activities in 2024: (a) proceeds from maturity and sale net of investment in debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income or loss, net in an amount of $5.2 million; (b) net decrease in short-term and long-term deposits in an amount of $24.1 million; and (c) proceeds from sale of property and equipment in an amount of $0.8 million.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2023 was attributable to: (i) expenditures (net of cash acquired) with respect to business acquisitions in an aggregate amount of $37.0 million; (ii) purchase of property and equipment and intangible assets in an amount of $17.4 million; (iii) purchase of other investments in an amount of $0.5 million; (iv) capitalization of software development and other costs in an amount of $14.6 million; (v) payments to former shareholders of consolidated company in an amount of $7.9 million; (vi) net increase in short-term and long-term deposits in an amount of $51.5 million and (vii) payments in conjunction with deferred payments and contingent liabilities related to business combinations in an amount of $11.9 million. This cash use was offset in part by the following cash amounts provided by investing activities in 2023: (a) proceeds from maturity and sale net of investment in debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income or loss, net in an amount of $0.7 million; and (b) proceeds from sale of property and equipment in an amount of $1.0 million.
Company Commitments
The total principal amount of all debentures—including Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures—issued by Formula (on a stand-alone basis) that remain outstanding as of March 31, 2025 constituted NIS 483.2 million (approximately $132.5 million).
For a description of the amounts outstanding under these debenture series and the related covenants and restrictions to which we are subject, please see “Sources of Financing” above in this Item 5.B (“Liquidity and Capital Resources”).
We do not have material commitments for capital expenditures by Formula as of December 31, 2024 or as of the date of this annual report.
We have entered into an undertaking to indemnify our office holders in specified limited categories of events and in specified amounts, subject to certain limitations. For more information, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions— Related Party Transactions— Indemnification of Office Holders.”
Subsidiary Commitments
Our subsidiaries do not have any material commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2024 or as of the date of this annual report.
As alluded to above (see “Sources of Financing—Subsidiary and Affiliate Financing Activities” in this Item 5.B (“Liquidity and Capital Resources”)), the loan agreements, debentures and indentures to which we are party contain a number of conditions and limitations on the way in which we (Matrix, Sapiens, Magic Software, Zap Group, Michpal and Formula) can operate our businesses, including limitations on our ability to raise debt and sell or acquire assets not in normal business activity. For example, Matrix’s loan agreement includes a negative pledge with respect to Matrix’s assets, as well as limitations on Matrix’s ability to provide guarantees to third parties and sell or transfer its assets. Matrix’s loan agreements also contain various covenants which require it to maintain certain financial ratios related to shareholders’ equity and operating results that are customary for companies of comparable size.
Our subsidiaries and affiliates have provided bank guarantees aggregating to approximately $49.0 million as of December 31, 2024 as security for the performance of various contracts with customers. If our subsidiaries and affiliates were to breach certain terms of such contracts, the customers could demand that the banks providing the guarantees pay amounts claimed to be due.
124
Our subsidiaries and affiliates have also provided additional bank guarantees aggregating to $7.6 million as of December 31, 2024 as security for rent to be paid for their offices. If our subsidiary and affiliate were to breach certain terms of their leases, the lessors could demand that the banks providing the guarantees pay amounts claimed to be due.
Pursuant to the Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures described above, liens have been incurred over a certain portion of our investment in outstanding shares of Matrix, Sapiens and Magic Software, in respect of the amounts shown in the table below:
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| Formula’s Series C Secured Debentures | Formula’s Series D Secured Debentures | |||||||
| Matrix ordinary shares, par value NIS 1 per share | 1,342,941 | 3,149,761 | ||||||
| Sapiens common shares, par value €0.01 per share | 1,172,645 | 2,957,590 | ||||||
| C. | Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. |
The net amounts that we spent on research and development activities in 2023 and 2024 were $78.0 million and $84.4 million, respectively. For more information about our research and development activities, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview— Software Development.”
For information concerning our intellectual property rights, see “Item 4. Information on the Company— Business Overview— Intellectual Property Rights.”
| D. | Trend Information |
Trends Impacting Our Industry and Our Business
Trends in the information technology market (IT)
The year 2024 marked the onset of a recovery trend in the global technology market following a period of volatility. According to data published by Forrester8 in 2024, and subject to final year-end adjustments, global technology spending was projected to increase by approximately 4.6%. Within this framework, the software segment was anticipated to grow by approximately 11.5%, while IT services were expected to increase by approximately 3.6%. In comparison, Gartner9 projected global technology spending in 2024 to grow by approximately 7.7%, with the software sector anticipated to expand by 12% and IT services by 5.6%. Gartner further reported that the fastest-growing segment in 202410 was expected to be Data Centers, with a projected annual growth rate of 39.4%, surpassing even the Cloud Computing sector, which has consistently led global IT growth in recent years. Within Cloud Computing, the Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) segment was forecast to grow by 21.3%11, contributing to an overall cloud spending increase of 19.2% in 2024. The substantial increase in Data Center investments was attributed to the accelerated global adoption of smartphones, personal computers (PCs), and AI-optimized servers. Notably, approximately 70% of AI-optimized servers are procured by service providers and hyper-scale cloud vendors, reflecting a significant shift in infrastructure demand dynamics.
In Israel, forecasts for IT spending in 2024 continue to be influenced by the geopolitical environment and associated macroeconomic uncertainties. According to projections by STKI, a leading Israeli IT market research firm, domestic IT expenditures are expected to increase by only 2.95% for the year.
Looking ahead to 2025, global analysts anticipate a continuation of the recovery and growth trend in technology investments. Forrester projects an increase of approximately 5.6% in global technology spending in 2025, including 10.5% growth in the software sector and 3.6% in IT services12. Gartner provides a more optimistic forecast, anticipating an overall increase of 9.8% in global IT spending, with the software sector projected to grow by 14.2% and IT services by 9.0%13.
In addition, Data Center investment is expected to remain robust in 2025, albeit at a slightly moderated pace, with projected growth of 23.2%. Cloud Computing expenditures are forecast to grow by 21.5%, with the IaaS segment continuing to lead at an anticipated growth rate of 24.8%14.
In the Israeli market, a notable recovery in IT spending is also expected during 2025. According to STKI, local IT expenditures are projected to grow by approximately 8.17%, reflecting improving market conditions and increased business confidence.
| 8 | https://www.forrester.com/report/global-tech-market-forecast-2024-to-2029/RES182048 |
| 9 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-01-21-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-it-spending-to-grow-9-point-8-percent-in-2025 |
| 10 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-01-21-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-it-spending-to-grow-9-point-8-percent-in-2025 |
| 11 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-19-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-public-cloud-end-user-spending-to-total-723-billion-dollars-in-2025 |
| 12 | https://www.forrester.com/report/global-tech-market-forecast-2024-to-2029/RES182048 |
| 13 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-01-21-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-it-spending-to-grow-9-point-8-percent-in-2025 |
| 14 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-19-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-public-cloud-end-user-spending-to-total-723-billion-dollars-in-2025 |
125
Hi-Tech Sector and Lack of Technological Human Capital and Related Professionals
In 2024, the slowdown in Israel's high-tech sector continued, a trend that worsened due to the implications of the disputes surrounding the judicial reform and the impact of the Iron Swords War. All these factors led to a sharp decline in investments in the high-tech sector in 2024, particularly from foreign sources. This was reflected, inter alia, in a decrease in the number of startups and a decline in demand for technological personnel, with an emphasis on less experienced employees (juniors). As a result, workforce reductions and layoffs occurred in some companies in the sector, including in the development centers of multinational high-tech companies. A large part of those who were laid off were re-employed in the industry, which still suffers from a shortage of technological manpower, particularly in certain roles, especially experienced professionals15.
Overall, the declining demand for employees in high-tech companies may make it easier for our subsidiaries to recruit and retain employees, and to mitigate the pressure for wage increases on the part of the employees. At the same time, the slowdown in the high-tech industry could lead to a decrease in demand and even damage to some of our customers in this area of activity and consequently cause damage to the results of the Company's activities.
The U.S. information technology (IT) market is directly affected by macroeconomic developments in the United States. Throughout 2024, the U.S. economy maintained its recovery trajectory, evidenced by declining inflation rates and reductions in interest rates. The U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) recorded an annual growth rate of approximately 2.8% in 2024, compared to 2.9% in 2023, reflecting continued economic resilience.
According to projections by Forrester16, once final year-end data for 2024 are published and consolidated, the U.S. technology market is expected to demonstrate a growth rate of 5.8%, surpassing the projected global average of 4.6%. Looking ahead to 2025, growth in the U.S. technology sector is forecast to reach 5.6%, aligning with the global growth rate. Specifically, software spending in the U.S. was anticipated to increase by 11.5% in 2024 and by a further 10.7% in 2025. IT services expenditures were expected to grow by 3.9% in 2024 and 3.5% in 2025. Notably, the financial sector was projected to account for approximately 23.3% of total U.S. IT spending in 2024.
Regulatory obligations, operational requirements, and enhanced reporting frameworks in the U.S. financial sector continue to serve as key drivers of demand for the Matrix’s Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) services. In response to ongoing geopolitical tensions—including the war between Russia and Ukraine, strained U.S.–China relations, and volatility in global capital markets—the U.S. government has adopted more stringent financial regulations, thereby contributing to increased GRC-related expenditures. Financial institutions have continued to invest in systems supporting anti-money laundering (AML) and fraud prevention. Concurrently, the regulatory framework for cybersecurity has evolved, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) expanding its incident reporting requirements, fueling demand for advanced, AI-enabled risk detection tools.
Furthermore, the rapid proliferation of digital financial transactions—driven by the growth of fintech platforms, the increase in digital payments, and elevated cybersecurity risks—has heightened regulatory scrutiny in areas such as fraud prevention. These trends have necessitated the deployment of more sophisticated IT systems. The growing institutionalization of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, has also reinforced the demand for AML controls and regulatory oversight. Collectively, these regulatory and compliance developments generally exert a positive influence on the demand for the Company's services, which are often required to implement structural, procedural, and technological adjustments within limited timeframes.
The U.S. general elections held in November 2024, and the subsequent election of President Trump may have complex and potentially opposing implications for our operations in the U.S. On the one hand, a renewed focus on national security— particularly in the area of cybersecurity— may result in increased demand for AI-based and cybersecurity solutions. In addition, continued labor shortages in the U.S. could be exacerbated by more restrictive immigration policies, which may in turn heighten demand for professional services provided by our global delivery centers in Israel, India, and Eastern Europe. Furthermore, if the incoming administration implements its stated intention to lower the corporate tax rate to 15%, such a change could enhance our profitability and increase our capacity to reinvest in growth initiatives.
| 15 | According to the CBS publication dated 15 July 2024, on the number of job vacancies for April–June 2024, the number of job vacancies in the high-tech sector in the second quarter of 2024 decreased to approximately 11,800, representing a decline of more than 8% compared to the corresponding quarter in 2023.https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/mediarelease/DocLib/2023/230/20_23_230hightec.pdf |
| 16 | https://www.forrester.com/report/us-tech-market-forecast-2024-to-2029/RES182051 |
126
Conversely, the new administration may pursue deregulatory policies in the financial sector, which could lead to reduced demand for certain traditional GRC solutions, particularly in areas such as AML and fraud prevention. Any such easing of compliance obligations could result in a decrease in demand for the Company’s compliance-focused offerings. Moreover, the implementation of an “America First” economic agenda may involve the imposition of tariffs or other restrictions on offshore services, which could elevate our operating costs and diminish the attractiveness of outsourcing solutions for U.S.-based customers.
Similar to what we described regarding the software sector in Israel, the U.S. is also experiencing a shortage of experienced IT professionals. This workforce imbalance presents both opportunities and challenges for the Company. On one hand, the labor shortage may constrain the Company’s ability to fulfill growing demand for technological services in the U.S. and require higher compensation to attract and retain personnel, thereby exerting downward pressure on operating margins. On the other hand, the increased adoption of remote work arrangements has enabled our subsidiaries to reduce their physical office footprint and broaden their access to talent pools in Israel and Eastern Europe. While this strategy may not yield substantial labor cost savings (particularly in relation to Israeli personnel), it enhances operational flexibility and helps our subsidiaries to meet the ongoing demand for highly skilled resources in the U.S. market.
Trend in Israeli Defense Spending
Overall, against the backdrop of geopolitical uncertainty worldwide and the security situation in Israel, there has been an increase in the activity levels of defense companies, as well as in the volume of their contracts and backlogs. This trend accordingly generates strong demand from defense customers for development services, professional services, and other work scopes from these customers. Additionally, the uncertainty arising from escalating geopolitical tensions in Israel and worldwide increases the threat levels faced by customers in the fields of cybersecurity and information security. Accordingly, this drives strong demand in these areas, as well as in the sale and marketing of infrastructure and equipment to establish or enhance business continuity (BCP) and disaster recovery plans.
Our Matrix and Magic Software subsidiaries and our TSG Systems affiliate employ hundreds of experts with extensive operational and technological experience, providing services to the Israeli Defense Forces, or IDF, the Israeli Ministry of Defense, and leading defense industries, as well as participating in projects for international defense organizations.
We specialize in engineering, technology, cybersecurity, and deep learning (AI & Deep Learning), integrating advanced technologies into complex operational environments, planning and executing technological projects in fields such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS), NLP, video and image processing, advanced cybersecurity and intelligence— including embedded devices, embedded computer systems, and national defense systems (national CERT)— as well as the development of command and control systems, intelligence, simulation systems, and more.
Under our defense operations, we operate one of the largest and most diverse defense consulting bodies in Israel, combining deep operational understanding with technology. Our expertise includes initiating processes, strategic consulting, business planning within the domain, market research and competitive intelligence, concept development, system planning and specification, as well as leading performance analysis capabilities in Israel. Our defense operations have been awarded new projects, including those in public and private cloud environments, AI, data, and cybersecurity, and continue to execute projects for foreign governments.
127
In response to the challenges posed by the Iron Swords War, Matrix Defense faced a dual challenge: on one hand, the massive mobilization of reservists among our employees, and on the other, the urgent need to provide critical support and adapt our operations to the evolving operational and security needs of our customers. This included a special commitment to the Ministry of Defense and the defense industries, rapid system deployments, round-the-clock 24/7 operations, and continuous support for customer systems, all of which contributed to our growth in this sector.
Trend in Cyber Spending
The escalation of cyber threats, particularly amid heightened geopolitical tensions—including the outbreak of the “Iron Swords” War—has led to a significant increase in the frequency, intensity, sophistication, and complexity of cyberattacks. These developments have materially heightened exposure to cyber risks, particularly for Israeli-based entities. In this context, the risk of a material cyber incident targeting our subsidiaries core systems—whether those used in the management of their day-to-day operations, in the delivery of services to customers, or in the storage and processing of third-party data—has increased.
Should such a cyber threat materialize, it could adversely affect our operations, impair our ability to provide uninterrupted services to our customers, damage our reputation, expose us and our subsidiaries and affiliates to legal and regulatory proceedings, and jeopardize existing or prospective business engagements. Such an event may also result in significant financial losses.
At the same time, heightened concern regarding cyber threats has had a positive effect on the market's awareness of the need for robust information security, which has supported demand for our subsidiaries (especially Matrix and Magic Software) cybersecurity offerings, particularly our managed cyber solutions and related services.
Our Group, which offers, through our subsidiaries, information security and cybersecurity services as part of their core portfolio, allocates substantial resources and engages in ongoing efforts to protect our systems against cyber threats. These measures include the implementation of advanced technological solutions, establishment of internal policies and procedures for incident response and risk mitigation, deployment of protective mechanisms (such as multi-factor remote authentication), and adherence to recognized cybersecurity standards and frameworks.
Additional steps taken include regular reviews and updates of our information security policies, employee training and awareness programs, and periodic internal and external audits. We also conduct cybersecurity simulations to test our defenses and make ongoing improvements based on simulation outcomes and industry best practices.
The board of directors of each of our publicly traded subsidiaries receives periodic briefings on their companies cybersecurity posture and preparedness. Responsibility for cybersecurity oversight rests with a dedicated management structure, including Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) and specialized Information Security Departments staffed by certified professionals. These departments, in collaboration with external experts, conduct regular assessments of their company’s network defenses and information assets. Assessment methodologies include risk assessments, penetration testing, vulnerability analysis, compliance surveys, internal audits, and more.
We believe that the continuation of technological advancement, the ongoing digital transformation of organizations, and persisting geopolitical tensions—including the Iron Swords War and the Russia–Ukraine conflict—are likely to sustain or even intensify cybersecurity challenges in 2024 and beyond.
128
According to research published by Gartner17, global cybersecurity spending increased by 14.2% in 2023 and is projected to rise by an additional 14.3% in 2024. Within the cybersecurity domain, the subfields of Cloud Security and Data Privacy are expected to exhibit the most significant growth in 2024, with each projected to increase by approximately 25%.
Trend in Technology/Digital Insurance
There are various sales and marketing trends that influence Sapiens’ business.
Gartner, a leading global research and advisory company, has stated in its “Insurance CIO Priorities 2024: Insights for Technology and Service Providers’ Product Plans”, published on January 2, 2024 by James Ingham, that:
| ● | Insurance respondents continued focus on application modernization, cybersecurity, data science and cloud, as seen in previous years. However, for 2024, respondents have reported increased funding for integration technologies, and APIs and API architecture have risen to the top of the priority list for the first time. |
| ● | Generative AI advancements have the potential to improve and accelerate the accuracy and efficiency of existing AI use cases — such as real-time summarization of customer call issues or extraction of data from complex policy documents — before unlocking value for net new use cases. |
| ● | Insurance CIOs are taking a measured approach to cryptocurrency transactions, metaverse, quantum computing, 5G and blockchain, and may adopt these technologies either slowly or indirectly. |
Other analyst reports, which were published previously, highlighted potential growth opportunities and areas of focus for insurers.
Other Trends
As people accumulate more property and live longer, the insurance industry has become more competitive. The competition for the customers’ business requires insurers to improve customer experience, be faster to market with new products and offer innovative channels, such as social media and mobile. Innovative technology infrastructure is necessary to support these business initiatives.
In addition, insurers are faced with the increasing significance of regulatory changes to protect the policyholder in many markets, particularly large insurers that are considered important to the stability of the world economic system. Many insurers are integrating enterprise risk management as standard operating procedure, while spreading ownership of risk throughout the strategic decision-making process.
| 17 | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-08-28-gartner-forecasts-global-information-security-spending-to-grow-15-percent-in-2025 |
129
As customers become more sophisticated, the support of innovative products and distribution channels is mandatory. Insurers are identifying growth opportunities by attracting new customers and retaining current customers by seeking to reinvent the customer experience and provide quote and policy information to their customers upon request. This means strong emphasis on digitalization of processes, rapid configuration and omni-channel distribution needs.
With today’s strong trend of shifting attention to the end-customer experience and activities, there is an increasing focus on digital operations to support the increasing usage of the Internet for sales, recommendations and general communication. This affects the carriers’ needs to innovate their product proposition through a flexible and modern solution. Another substantial trend is the increasing usage of data for decision-making, risk analysis, and customers’ evaluation and rating, which requires streamlined data flow and easy access to information from multiple sources.
Increased global competition, the need to improve distribution channels and provide an enhanced customer experience, and efforts to expand into new countries and markets, have required heavy investments from insurers, resulting in a trend towards consolidation. This has mainly included consolidation of applications, databases, development tools, hardware and data centers.
A very notable trend is the rapidly increasing interest in AI, predictive models, and now also Generative-AI that is expected to bring a significant level of innovation, change, process automation and a growing trend of leveraging the huge amount of data captured by insurance carriers, to provide real-time insights and operational advice on managing the operation.
Also, the transfer to cloud-based systems in a SaaS engagement model with a subscription-type contracts is getting stronger, and we witness a growing and strong preference of customers and carriers to benefit from a cloud-native system.
Property & Casualty Market Trends
Property & casualty insurance protects policyholders against a range of losses on items of value. P&C insurance includes the personal segment, which is insurance coverage for individuals, with products such as motor, home, personal property and travel; the commercial segment, covering aspects of commercial activity, such as commercial property, car fleets, cyber and professional liability; and specialty lines, covering unique domains, such as marine, art and credit insurance. This market also includes workers’ compensation for market carriers, administrators and state funds, and Medical Professional Liability for health care professionals.
During the past few years, the P&C market has been characterized by a fast rate of digital adoption. New business and technology models are adopted rapidly, to launch innovative business offerings. This requires advanced software solutions, both on the core layer, which needs to be flexible and open, and with the variety of digital tools addressing customer experience needs.
Life, Pension & Annuity Markets Trends
Life, pension & annuity providers offer their customers a wide range of products for long-term savings, protection, pension and insurance. They assist policyholders with financial planning through life insurance, medical and investment products. Their products can be classified into several areas, primarily investment and savings, risk and protection, pension and health-related products. These products can be targeted to individuals, as well as group- and employee-benefit types of products.
The products in this field are long-term in nature. When insurance providers consider purchasing new platforms from Sapiens, the decision is typically slower and involves multiple decision-makers throughout the organization.
130
Reinsurance Market Trends
Reinsurance is insurance that is purchased by an insurance company (ceded reinsurance) from another insurance company (assumed reinsurance) as a means of risk management. The reinsurer and the insurer enter into a reinsurance agreement, which details the conditions upon which the reinsurer would pay the insurer’s losses. The reinsurer is paid a reinsurance premium by the insurer and the insurer issues insurance policies to its own policyholders. The insurer must maintain an accurate system of records to track its reinsurance contracts and treaties, to avoid claims leakage.
Workers’ Compensation Trends
Workers’ compensation is one of the largest lines of business in the P&C industry in North America. But future profitability is getting harder to maintain, with medical and indemnity costs per lost time claim increasing at rates greater than inflation. Insurance organizations require technology solutions that can adapt quickly to business and market conditions, offering high levels of accuracy and efficiency.
Financial & Compliance Market Trends
Financial professionals face overwhelming challenges as they struggle to satisfy ever-changing regulatory requirements, while meeting the demands of managerial reporting. The move towards globalization has introduced new currencies, and CEOs need more performance data for strategic decision-making. Organizations require one partner to optimize efficiencies with solutions that can be implemented quickly.
Decision Management Market Trends
Increasing competition, regulatory burden, customer experience expectations and the proliferation of digital and product innovation requirements have necessitated a shift in thinking and approach among organizations across verticals. By replacing conventional policy and process management with the discipline known as “decision management,” financial institutions are bridging the gap between business and IT, by enabling business users to rapidly frame requirements in formal business models that can be easily understood by all stakeholders.
The decision management processes affect overall corporate performance, including its impact on customers and competitors. Decision management systems are a key performance component of every financial services organization, as they help the organization define, avoid and hedge financial risk.
Business Decision Management Market Needs
Many large organizations, particularly in the financial services market, must comply with complex regulations. They operate in highly competitive markets that require quick responses. Business logic drives most of the financial services transactions and is the backbone of an organization’s policies and strategies, and its ability to successfully operate.
To achieve efficiency, business owners must assume ownership of the business logic and possess the ability to define, modify, standardize and reuse it across the organization. Business logic is defined today by business owners and compliance officers, but IT departments translate the requirements into code. This process raises several key challenges: 1) the result does not always accurately reflect the business requirements; 2) the new requirements might conflict with, or override, previous requirements; 3) the changes can take a long time and, 4) the entire process is not fully audited. These gaps often create an inefficient and risk-exposed organization.
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for the period from January 1, 2024 through the date of this annual report that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our revenue, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that caused the disclosed financial information to be not necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial condition.
For additional trend information, please see the discussion in “Item 4. Information on the Company— Business Overview” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— Results of Operations.”
131
| E. | Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates |
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. The preparation of our financial statements required us, in certain circumstances, to make estimations, assumptions and judgments that affect the reporting amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities within the reporting period. We have based our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. More detailed descriptions of these policies are provided in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report.
Basis of presentation of the financial statements:
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS accounting standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (hereafter “IFRS”) .
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a cost basis, except for certain assets and liabilities such as: financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income; liabilities in respect of business combination; other financial assets and liabilities (including derivatives) which are presented at fair value through profit or loss; provisions; employee benefit assets and liabilities; investments in associates and joint ventures.
The Company has elected to present the profit or loss items using the function of expense method.
Use of estimates, judgments and assumptions:
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions, that have an effect on the application of the accounting policies and on the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the financial statements. Such estimates, judgments and assumptions are related, but not limited to, effective control and Estimate of Percentage of Completion for Measurement of Progress on Long-Term Fixed-Price Contracts. The Company’s management believes that the estimates, judgments, and assumptions used are reasonable based upon information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in accounting estimates are reported in the period of the change in estimate.
132
In the process of applying the accounting policies, the Group has made the following judgments which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements:
-Effective control:
The Company evaluates whether it controls a company in which it holds less than the majority of the voting rights by, among others, reference to the size of its share of voting rights relative to the size and dispersion of voting rights held by the other shareholders, and by voting patterns at previous shareholders’ meetings.
-Estimate of Percentage of Completion for Measurement of Progress on Long-Term Fixed-Price Contracts:
The percentage of completion is determined based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to the total estimated cost of each contract. This total cost is estimated by the Company based on assessments of expected labor costs, subcontractor costs, and other relevant factors.
Consolidated financial statements:
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of companies that we controlled (subsidiaries). Control is achieved when we are exposed, or have rights, to variable returns from our involvement with the investee and have the ability to affect those returns through our power over the investee. Potential voting rights are considered when assessing whether an entity has control. The consolidation of the financial statements commences on the date on which control is obtained and ends when such control ceases.
Our financial statements and the financial statements of our investees, after being adjusted to comply with IFRS, are prepared for the same reporting period and using consistent accounting treatment of similar transactions and economic activities. Any discrepancies in the applied accounting policies are eliminated by making appropriate adjustments. Significant intragroup balances and transactions and gains or losses resulting from intragroup transactions are eliminated in full in the consolidated financial statements.
Effective control:
In a situation where the Company holds less than a majority of voting power in a given entity, but that power is sufficient to enable the Company to unilaterally direct the relevant activities of such entity, then control is exercised. When assessing whether voting rights held by the Company are sufficient to give it power, the Company considers all facts and circumstances, including: the amount of those voting rights relative to the amount and dispersion of other vote holders; potential voting rights held by the Company and other shareholders or parties; rights arising from other contractual arrangements; significant personal ties; and any additional facts and circumstances that may indicate that the Company has, or does not have, the ability to direct the relevant activities when decisions need to be made, inclusive of voting patterns observed at previous meetings of shareholders.
133
The Company’s management has concluded that despite the lack of absolute majority of voting power at the general meetings of shareholders of Matrix, Sapiens and Magic Software, in accordance with IFRS 10, these investees are controlled by the Company. The conclusion regarding the existence of control during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 with respect to Matrix, Sapiens and Magic Software, in accordance with IFRS 10, was made in accordance with the following factors:
Matrix:
As of December 31, 2024, the Company held 48.21% of the outstanding ordinary shares of Matrix. The conclusion regarding the existence of control in Matrix, in line with IFRS 10, was made considering the following additional factors:
Governing bodies of Matrix:
Decisions of Matrix shareholders’ general meeting are taken by a simple majority of votes represented at the general meeting; the annual (ordinary) general meeting adopts resolutions to elect individual directors, appoint Matrix’s independent auditors for the next year, as well as approve Matrix’s financial statements and management’s report on operations; in accordance with Matrix’s articles of association, the board of directors of Matrix is responsible for managing its current business operations and is authorized to take substantially all decisions which are not specifically reserved to Matrix’s shareholders by its articles of association, including the decision to pay out dividends; Matrix’s board of directors is composed of 5 members, 2 of whom are external directors as required by the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999, another one of whom is an independent director, while the remaining two directors are associated with Formula, including Formula’s chief executive officer who serves as the chairman of Matrix’s board of directors.
Shareholders structure of Matrix:
Matrix shareholders’ structure may be considered dispersed because, apart from the Company, only three shareholders (both Israeli institutional investors) held more than 5% of Matrix’s voting power as of December 31, 2024 (holds 8.48%, 6.75% and 5.31%, respectively); there is no evidence that any of the shareholders has or had granted to any other shareholder a voting proxy at the general meeting; over the last three years (i.e., 2022-2024), Matrix’s general meetings were attended by shareholders representing in aggregate between 82% -85% of total voting rights. This means that the level of activity of the Matrix’s shareholders is relatively moderate. Bearing in mind that the Company presently holds approx.
48.21% of total voting rights, the attendance from shareholders would have to be higher than 96.42% in order to deprive Formula of an absolute majority of votes at the general meeting. The Company believes that achieving such high attendance seems unlikely. In addition, Israeli law provides that institutional investors should not hold the ability to direct the company’s business and as such should not exceed 20% each. An institutional investor cannot also hold more than 20% seats in board of directors. Looking at entire Israeli market the practice is that institutional investors are not taking positions on boards of directors – as having such position would impact institutional investors’ ability to have certain transactions on the market (e.g. insider trading threat). If institutional investors cooperate between themselves, they may be considered violating this rule – moreover if they vote in the same way however, contrary to the major shareholder they might be accused of cooperation and violation of the rule. Hence, there is both legal and practical limitation of these investors to coordinate approaches.
Therefore it is management’s opinion that despite the lack of an absolute majority of shares in Matrix, the Company is still able to influence the appointment of directors at Matrix and therefore may affect Matrix’ directions of development as well as its current business operations.
Sapiens:
As of December 31, 2024, the Company held 43.51% of the outstanding common shares of Sapiens. The conclusion regarding the existence of control in Sapiens, in line with IFRS 10, was made considering the following factors:
Governing bodies of Sapiens:
Decisions of Sapiens shareholders’ general meeting are taken by a simple majority of votes represented at the general meeting; the annual (ordinary) general meeting adopts resolutions to appoint individual directors, choose Sapiens’ independent auditors for the next year, as well as approve the company’s financial statements and management’s report on operations; in accordance with Sapiens’ articles of association, the board of directors of Sapiens is responsible for managing its current business operations and is authorized to take substantially all decisions which are not specifically reserved to Sapiens’ shareholders by its articles of association, including the decision to pay out dividends. Sapiens’ board of directors is composed of 6 members, 3 of whom are independent directors, and the other three are associated with Formula, including Formula’s chief executive officer who serves as the chairman of Sapiens’ board of directors.
134
Shareholders structure of Sapiens:
Sapiens shareholders’ structure is dispersed because no other shareholder except for the Company’s controlling shareholder, held as of December 31, 2024 more than 5% of the voting rights. There is no evidence that any shareholder has or had granted to any other shareholder a voting proxy at the general meeting; and, over the last three years (i.e., 2022-2024), Sapiens’ general meetings were attended by shareholders representing in total between 82%-89% the total voting rights, including the Company’s voting rights. This means that the level of activity of Sapiens’ shareholders is relatively moderate. Bearing in mind that the Company presently holds approx. 43.51% of total voting rights, the attendance from shareholders would have to be higher than 87.02% in order to deprive Formula of an absolute majority of votes at the general meeting. The Company believes that achieving such high attendance seems unlikely.
Therefore it is management’s opinion that despite the lack of an absolute majority of shares in Sapiens, the Company is still able to influence the appointment of directors at Sapiens and therefore may affect Sapiens’ directions of development as well as its current business operations.
Magic Software:
As of December 31, 2024, the Company held 46.71% of the outstanding ordinary shares of Magic Software. The conclusion regarding the existence of control in Magic Software, in line with IFRS 10, was made considering the following factors:
Governing bodies of Magic Software:
Decisions of Magic Software shareholders’ general meeting are taken by a simple majority of votes represented at the general meeting; the annual (ordinary) general meeting adopts resolutions to elect individual directors, appoint Magic Software’s independent auditors for the next year, as well as to approve Magic Software’s financial statements and the management’s report on operations; in accordance with Magic Software’s articles of association, the board of directors of Magic Software is responsible for managing Magic Software’s current business operations and is authorized to take substantially all decisions which are not specifically reserved to Magic Software’s shareholders by its articles of association, including the decision to pay out dividends; and, Magic Software’s board of directors is composed of 6 members, 4 of whom are external or independent directors, the other two are associated with Formula, including Formula’s chief executive officer, who also serves as Magic Software’s chief executive officer.
Shareholders structure of Magic Software:
Magic Software shareholders’ structure is dispersed because, apart from the Company, as of December 31, 2024, two financial Israeli institutional shareholders holding more than 5% of Magic Software’s voting rights (holds 11.54% and 6.97%, respectively); there is no evidence that any of the shareholders have or had granted to any other shareholder a voting proxy at the general meeting; and, over the last three years (i.e., 2022-2024), Magic Software’s general meetings were attended by shareholders representing between 84.7%-86.7% of the total voting rights. This means that the level of activity of the Magic Software’s shareholders is relatively moderate. Bearing in mind that the Company presently holds approx. 46.71% of total voting rights, the attendance from shareholders would have to be higher than 93.42% in order to deprive Formula of an absolute majority of votes at the general meeting. The Company believes that achieving such high attendance seems unlikely. In addition, Israeli law provides that institutional investors should not hold the ability to direct the company’s business and as such should not exceed 20% each. An institutional investor cannot also hold more than 20% seats in board of directors. Looking at entire Israeli market the practice is that institutional investors are not taking positions on boards of directors – as having such position would impact institutional investors’ ability to have certain transactions on the market (e.g. insider trading threat). If institutional investors cooperate between themselves, they may be considered violating this rule – moreover if they vote in the same way however, contrary to the major shareholder they might be accused of cooperation and violation of the rule. Hence, there is both legal and practical limitation of these investors to coordinate approaches.
135
Therefore, it is management’s opinion that despite the lack of an absolute majority of shares in Magic Software, the Company is still able to influence the appointment of directors at Magic Software and therefore may affect Magic Software’s directions of development as well as its current business operations.
Other than our joint control of TSG, in which each of we and Israeli Aerospace Industries Ltd. hold 42.71% of its voting power (as of December 31, 2024), and our 21.45% share interest in an associate company, we currently have effective control under IFRS 10 of each of our other investees, Matrix, Sapiens, Magic Software, Zap Group, Michpal, Ofek Aerial Photography, Shamrad and InSync, despite our lacking absolute majority of voting power in Matrix, Magic Software and Sapiens. As a result of our effective control in these investees as of December 31, 2024 and in accordance with IFRS 10, we consolidated their financial results with ours throughout the period covered by the financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.
Non-controlling interests:
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries, represent the equity in subsidiaries not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Non-controlling interests are presented in equity separately from the equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company. Profit or loss and components of other comprehensive income are attributed to the Company and to non-controlling interests. Losses are attributed to non-controlling interests even if they result in a negative balance of non-controlling interests in the consolidated statement of financial position. A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as a change in equity by adjusting the carrying amount of the non-controlling interests with a corresponding adjustment of the equity attributable to equity holders of the Company less / plus the consideration paid or received. For more information regarding put options to the Non-controlling interests we consolidated their financial results with ours throughout the period covered by the financial statements included in Item 2(17)(E) of this annual report.
Business combinations and goodwill:
Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method. The cost of the acquisition is measured at the fair value of the consideration transferred on the acquisition date with the addition of non-controlling interests in the acquiree. In each business combination, we consider whether to measures the non-controlling interests in the acquiree based on their fair value on the acquisition date or at their proportionate share in the fair value of the acquiree’s net identifiable assets.
Direct acquisition costs are carried to the statement of profit or loss as incurred.
Contingent consideration is recognized at fair value on the acquisition date and classified as a financial asset or liability in accordance with IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments”. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration are recognized in profit or loss. If the contingent consideration is classified as an equity instrument, it is measured at fair value on the acquisition date without subsequent remeasurement.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost which represents the excess of the acquisition consideration and the amount of non-controlling interests over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the resulting amount is negative, the acquirer recognizes the resulting gain on the acquisition date.
136
Investment in joint arrangements:
Joint arrangements are arrangements in which the Company has joint control. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
Joint ventures:
In joint ventures the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. A joint venture is accounted for by using the equity method.
Functional currency, presentation currency and foreign currency:
The presentation currency of our consolidated financial statements is the U.S. dollar (the “dollar”), since we believe that financial statements in U.S. dollars provide more relevant information to our investors and users of the financial statements. The functional currency applied by Formula, on a stand-alone basis, until December 31, 2018, was the dollar. Following an examination and reevaluation of the primary economic environment in which Formula currently operates and expects to continue operating and taking into consideration the recent trends and its forward-looking business strategy, in accordance with the International Accounting Standard 21 (IAS 21), Formula concluded that our functional currency on a stand-alone basis commencing January 1, 2019 is the NIS. The functional currencies applied by our subsidiaries and associates are the currencies of the primary economic environment in which each one of them operates.
Assets and liabilities of an investee which is a foreign operation, including fair value adjustments upon acquisition, are translated at the closing rate at each reporting date. Profit or loss items are translated at average exchange rates for all periods presented. The resulting translation differences are recognized in other comprehensive income.
Intragroup loans for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future are, in substance, a part of the investment in the foreign operation and, accordingly, the exchange rate differences from these loans (net of the tax effect) are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss).
Upon the full or partial disposal of a foreign operation resulting in loss of control in the foreign operation, the cumulative gain (loss) from the foreign operation which had been recognized in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss. Upon the partial disposal of a foreign operation which results in the retention of control in the subsidiary, the relative portion of the amount recognized in other comprehensive income is reattributed to non-controlling interests.
Transactions, assets and liabilities in foreign currency:
Transactions denominated in foreign currency are recorded upon initial recognition at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. After initial recognition, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated at each reporting date into the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. Exchange rate differences are recognized in profit or loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency and measured at cost are translated at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency and measured at fair value are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined.
Short-term deposits:
Short-term deposits are deposits with an original maturity of more than three months from the date of investment and which do not meet the definition of cash equivalents. The deposits are presented according to their terms of deposit. Restricted deposits include deposits used to secure certain subsidiaries’ ongoing projects, as well as security deposits with respect to leases, and are classified under other short-term and long-term receivables.
137
Inventories:
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The cost of inventories comprises costs of purchase and costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less estimated costs of completion and estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are mainly comprised of purchased merchandise and products which consist of educational software kits, computers, peripheral equipment and spare parts. Cost is determined on the “first in – first out” basis. The Group periodically evaluates the condition and aging of its inventories and makes provisions for slow-moving inventories accordingly. No such impairments have been recognized in any period presented.
Investment in joint arrangements:
Joint arrangements are arrangements in which we have joint control. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
In joint ventures the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. A joint venture is accounted for by using the equity method.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized when the control over the goods or services is transferred to the customer. The transaction price is the amount of the consideration that is expected to be received based on the contract terms, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties (such as taxes).
In determining the amount of revenue from contracts with customers, we evaluate whether we are the principal or the agent in the arrangement. We are considered as the principal when we control the promised goods or services before transferring them to the customer. In these circumstances, we recognize revenue for the gross amount of the consideration. When we are considered as the agent, we recognize revenue for the net amount of the consideration, after deducting the amount due to the principal.
The following are principles that we utilize in determining revenue recognition for us and our consolidated subsidiaries and affiliate companies:
| i. | Sale of software licensing, maintenance services and post implementation consulting services |
A software licensing transaction that does not require significant implementation services is considered a distinct performance obligation, as the customer can benefit from the software on its own or together with other readily available resources.
We recognize revenue from software licensing transactions at a point in time when we provide the customer a right to use our intellectual property as it exists at the point in time at which the license is granted to the customer. We recognize revenue from software licensing transactions over time when we provide the customer a right to access our intellectual property throughout the license term.
We may generate revenue from sale of software licensing which includes significant implementation and customization services. In such contracts we are normally committed to provide the customer with a functional IT system and the customer can only benefit from such functional system, being the final product that would normally be comprised of proprietary licenses and significant related services. Revenues from these contracts are based on either fixed price or time and material.
138
Software licensing transactions which involve significant implementation, customization, or integration of the our software license to customer-specific requirements, are considered as one performance obligation satisfied over-time.
When post-implementation and consulting services do not involve significant customization, we account for such services as performance obligations satisfied over time and revenues are recognized as the services are provided.
Revenue from maintenance is recognized over time, during the period the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the our performance. When payments from customers are made before or after the service is performed, we recognize the resulting contract asset or liability.
| ii. | Sale of hardware and infrastructure |
Revenue from sale of hardware and infrastructure is recognized in profit or loss at the point in time when the control of the goods is transferred to the customer, generally upon delivery of the goods to the customer.
| iii. | Sale of training and implementation services |
Revenues from training and implementation services are recognized when the service is provided. revenue from training services in respect of public courses whose operating range is up to 3 months will be recognized at the end of the course period. Revenues from training services in respect of long-term courses will be recognized over the term of the course. Revenues from implementation projects ordered by organizations will be recognized according to actual inputs (actually worked hours).
| iv. | Revenue of contracts according to actual inputs |
Revenue from framework agreements for the performance of work according to actual inputs is recognized according to the hours invested.
| v. | Revenue of long-term fixed price contracts |
Revenue from long-term fixed-price contracts that involve significant implementation, customization, or integration to customer-specific requirements is recognized over time. The underlying deliverable is owned and controlled by the customer or does not create an asset with an alternative use to the Group and the Group has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed throughout the duration of the contract.
The Group applies a cost-based input method for measuring the progress of performance obligations that are satisfied over time. In applying this cost-based input method, the Group estimates the costs to complete contract performance in order to determine the amount of the revenue to be recognized. These estimated costs include the direct costs and the indirect costs that are directly attributable to a contract based on a reasonable allocation method. In certain circumstances, the Group is unable to measure the outcome of a contract, but the Group expects to recover the costs incurred in fulfilling the contract as of the reporting date. In such circumstances, the Group recognizes revenue to the extent of the costs incurred as of the reporting date until such time the outcome of the contract can be reasonably measured. If a loss is anticipated from a contract, the loss is recognized in full regardless of the percentage of completion.
When appropriate, the Group also applies a practical expedient permitted under IFRS 15 whereby if the Group has a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Group’s performance completed to date (for example, a service contract in which an entity bills a fixed amount for each hour of service provided), the Group may recognize revenue in the amount it is entitled to invoice. Deferred revenues, which represent a contract liability, include unearned amounts received under maintenance and support (mainly) and amounts received from customers for which revenues have not yet been recognized.
139
| vi. | Allocating the transaction price |
For contracts that consist of more than one performance obligation, at contract inception we allocate the contract transaction price to each performance obligation identified in the contract on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. The stand-alone selling price is the price at which we would sell the promised goods or services separately to a customer. We determine the standalone selling price for the purposes of allocating the transaction price to each performance obligation by considering several external and internal factors including, but not limited to, transactions where the specific performance obligation is sold separately, historical actual pricing practices and geographies in which we offer our products and services. If a specific performance obligation, such as the software license, is sold for a broad range of amounts (that is, the selling price is highly variable) or if we have not yet established a price for that good or service, and the good or service has not previously been sold on a standalone basis (that is, the selling price is uncertain), we apply the residual approach whereby all other performance obligations within a contract are first allocated a portion of the transaction price based upon their respective stand-alone selling prices, with any residual amount of transaction price allocated to the remaining specific performance obligation.
| vii. | Variable consideration |
We determine the transaction price separately for each contract with a customer. When exercising this judgment, we evaluate the effect of each variable amount in the contract, taking into consideration discounts, penalties, variations, claims, and non-cash consideration. In determining the effect of the variable consideration, we normally use the “most likely amount” method described in the Standard. Pursuant to this method, the amount of the consideration is determined as the single most likely amount in the range of possible consideration amounts in the contract. According to the Standard, variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
| viii. | Costs of obtaining a contract |
In order to obtain certain contracts with customers, we incur incremental costs in obtaining the contract (such as sales commissions which are contingent on making binding sales). Costs incurred in obtaining the contract with the customer which would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained and which we expect to recover are recognized as an asset and amortized on a systematic basis that is consistent with the provision of the services under the specific contract.
An impairment loss in respect of capitalized costs of obtaining a contract is recognized in profit or loss when the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the remaining amount of consideration that we expect to receive for the goods or services to which the asset relates, less the costs that relate directly to providing those goods or services and that have not been recognized as expenses.
We have elected to apply the practical expedient allowed by IFRS 15 according to which incremental costs of obtaining contract are recognized as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset is one year or less.
| ix. | Revenues that include warranty services |
In certain cases, we also provide a warranty for goods and services sold (i.e., extended warranties when we contractually undertake to repair any errors in the delivered software within a strictly specified time limit and/or when the scope of which is broader than just an assurance to the customer that the product/service complies with agreed-upon specifications). We have ascertained that such warranties granted by us meet the definition of service. The conclusion regarding the extended nature of a warranty is made whenever we contractually undertake to repair any errors in the delivered software within a strictly specified time limit and/or when such warranty is more extensive than the minimum required by law. Under IFRS 15, the fact of granting an extended warranty indicates that we provide an additional service. As such, we recognize an extended warranty as a separate performance obligation and allocate a portion of the transaction price to such service. In all cases where an extended warranty is accompanied by a maintenance service, which is even a broader category than the extended warranty itself, revenues are recognized over time because the customer consumes the benefits of such service as it is performed by the provider. If this is the case, we continue to allocate a portion of the transaction price to such maintenance service. Likewise, in cases where a warranty service is provided after the project completion and is not accompanied by any maintenance service, then a portion of the transaction price and analogically recognition of a portion of contract revenues will have to be deferred until the warranty service is actually fulfilled.
140
| x. | Disaggregation of revenue |
Service revenue includes contracts primarily for the provision of supplies and services other than design, development, customization, implementation, software maintenance and support and software updates associated with delivery of products or proprietary software. It may be a standalone service contract or a service performance obligation which is distinct from a contract or performance obligation for design, development, customization, support and upgrade or delivery of product. Our service contracts include contracts in which the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided as the performance obligations are satisfied. Our service contracts primarily include operation-type contracts, outsourcing, consulting, remote development services, digital advertising management, training and similar activities.
| xi. | Transaction prices allocated to performance obligation |
Remaining performance obligations represent contract revenue that has not yet been recognized, which includes deferred revenue and amounts that will be invoiced and recognized as revenue in future periods. The aggregate amount of consideration allocated to performance obligations either not satisfied or partially unsatisfied was approximately $2,409,529 as of December 31, 2024. Remaining performance obligations include the remaining non-cancelable, committed and fixed portion of these contracts for their entire duration. The remaining performance obligations related to professional services contracts that are on a time and materials basis were excluded, as the Company elected to apply the practical expedient in accordance with IFRS 15. We expect to recognize approximately 69.45% in 2025 from remaining performance obligations as of December 31, 2024, and the remainder thereafter.
Income tax:
Current or deferred taxes are recognized in profit or loss, except to the extent that they relate to items which are recognized in other comprehensive income or equity.
| i. | Current taxes: |
The current tax liability is measured using the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date as well as adjustments required in connection with the tax liability in respect of previous years.
| ii. | Deferred taxes: |
Deferred taxes are computed in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts in the financial statements and the amounts attributed for tax purposes. Deferred taxes are measured at the tax rate that is expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is not probable that they will be utilized. Deductible carry forward losses and temporary differences for which deferred tax assets had not been recognized are reviewed at each reporting date and a respective deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that their utilization is probable.
Taxes that would apply in the event of the disposal of investments in investees have not been taken into account in computing deferred taxes, as long as the disposal of the investments in investees is not probable in the foreseeable future. Also, deferred taxes that would apply in the event of distribution of earnings by investees as dividends have not been taken into account in computing deferred taxes, since the distribution of dividends does not involve an additional tax liability or since it is our policy not to initiate distribution of dividends from a subsidiary that would trigger an additional tax liability.
141
Taxes on income that relate to distributions of an equity instrument and to transaction costs of an equity transaction are accounted for pursuant to IAS 12.
Deferred taxes are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset a current tax asset against a current tax liability and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxpayer and the same taxation authority.
Leases:
The Group accounts for a contract as a lease when the contract terms convey the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
The Group as lessee:
For leases in which the Group is the lessee, the Group recognizes on the commencement date of the lease a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, excluding leases whose term is up to twelve months and leases for which the underlying asset is of low value. For these excluded leases, the Group has elected to recognize the lease payments as an expense in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In measuring the lease liability, the Group has elected to apply the practical expedient in the Standard and does not separate the lease components from the non-lease components (such as management and maintenance services, etc.) included in a single contract. Leases which entitle employees to a company car as part of their employment terms are accounted for as employee benefits in accordance with the provisions of IAS 19 and not as subleases.
On the commencement date, the lease liability includes all unpaid lease payments discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease, if that rate can be readily determined, or otherwise using the Group’s incremental borrowing rate. After the commencement date, the Group measures the lease liability using the effective interest rate method.
On the commencement date, the right-of-use asset is recognized in an amount equal to the lease liability plus lease payments already made on or before the commencement date and initial direct costs incurred. The right-of-use asset is measured applying the cost model and depreciated over the shorter of its useful life and the lease term.
Following are the amortization periods of the right-of-use assets by class of underlying asset:
| Years | Mainly | |||||||
| Land and Buildings | 2-12 | 3 | ||||||
| Motor vehicles | 2-3 | 3 | ||||||
The Group tests for impairment of the right-of-use asset whenever there are indications of impairment pursuant to the provisions of IAS 36.
Lease extension and termination options:
A non-cancelable lease term includes both the periods covered by an option to extend the lease when it is reasonably certain that the extension option will be exercised and the periods covered by a lease termination option when it is reasonably certain that the termination option will not be exercised.
142
In the event of any change in the expected exercise of the lease extension option or in the expected non-exercise of the lease termination option, the Group remeasures the lease liability based on the revised lease term using a revised discount rate as of the date of the change in expectations. The total change is recognized in the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset until it is reduced to zero, and any further reductions are recognized in profit or loss.
Lease modifications:
If a lease modification does not reduce the scope of the lease and does not result in a separate lease, the Group remeasures the lease liability based on the modified lease terms using a revised discount rate as of the modification date and records the change in the lease liability as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset. If a lease modification reduces the scope of the lease, the Group recognizes a gain or loss arising from the partial or full reduction of the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset and the lease liability. The Group subsequently remeasures the carrying amount of the lease liability according to the revised lease terms, at the revised discount rate as of the modification date and records the change in the lease liability as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset.
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Property, plant and equipment are measured at cost, including directly attributable costs, less accumulated depreciation, accumulated impairment losses and any related investment grants and excluding day-to-day servicing expenses. Cost includes spare parts and auxiliary equipment that are used in connection with plant and equipment. The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment comprises the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which the item is located.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the assets at annual rates as follows:
| % | ||
| Computers, software, and peripheral equipment | 20 – 66 (mainly 33) | |
| Office furniture and equipment | 6 – 33 (mainly 7) | |
| Motor vehicles | 13 – 33 (mainly 15) |
Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the lease (including option terms that are deemed to be reasonably assured) or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
The useful life, the depreciation method and the residual value of an asset are reviewed at least each year-end (at the end of the year) and any changes are accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate. Depreciation of an asset ceases at the earlier of the date that the asset is classified as held for sale and the date that the asset is derecognized. For impairment testing of property, plant and equipment, see note 2(16) in the financial statements of this annual report.
Intangible assets
Separately acquired intangible assets are measured on initial recognition at cost including directly attributable costs. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are measured at fair value at the acquisition date. Expenditures relating to internally generated intangible assets, excluding capitalized development costs, are recognized in profit or loss when incurred.
143
Intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their useful life and reviewed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired. The amortization period and the amortization method for an intangible asset are reviewed at least at each year end.
Capitalized software costs are measured at cost less any accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses on a product-by-product basis. Amortization of capitalized software costs begin when the development is complete, and the product is available for use or for sale. The Company considers a product to be available for use when the Company completes its internal validation of the product that is necessary to establish that the product meets its design specifications including functions, features, and technical performance requirements. Internal validation includes the completion of coding, documentation and testing that ensure bugs are reduced to a minimum. The internal validation of the product takes place a few weeks before the product is made available to the market. In certain instances, the Company enters into a short pre-release stage, during which the product is made available to a selected number of customers as a beta program for their own review and familiarization. Subsequently, the release is made generally available to customers. Once a product is considered available for use, the capitalization of costs ceases and amortization of such costs to “cost of sales” begins. Capitalized software costs are amortized on a product-by-product basis by the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software product (between 3-7 years).
| Years | ||||
| Customer relationship, backlog and distribution rights | 1–14 | |||
| Acquired technology | 2–10 | |||
| Patents | 10 | |||
Gains or losses arising from the derecognition of an intangible asset are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and are recognized in the statement of profit or loss.
The useful life of these assets is reviewed annually to determine whether their indefinite life assessment continues to be supportable. If the events and circumstances do not continue to support the assessment, the change in the useful life assessment from indefinite to finite is accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate, and on that date the asset is tested for impairment. Commencing from that date, the asset is amortized systematically over its useful life.
Impairment of non-financial assets:
We evaluate the need to record an impairment of non-financial assets (property, plant and equipment, capitalized software costs and other intangible assets, goodwill, investments in joint venture) whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount is not recoverable. If the carrying amount of non-financial assets exceeds their recoverable amount, the assets are reduced to their recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of sale and value in use. In measuring value in use, the expected future cash flows are discounted using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the risks specific to the asset. The recoverable amount of an asset that does not generate independent cash flows is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss.
An impairment loss of an asset, other than goodwill, is reversed only if there have been changes in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. Reversal of an impairment loss, as above, shall not be increased above the lower of the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of depreciation or amortization) had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years and its recoverable amount. The reversal of impairment loss of an asset presented at cost is recognized in profit or loss.
144
The following criteria are applied in assessing impairment of these specific assets:
| i. | Goodwill in respect of subsidiaries: |
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated, at the acquisition date, to each of our cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. We review goodwill for impairment once a year, on December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that there is an impairment.
Goodwill is tested for impairment by assessing the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit (or group of cash-generating units) to which the goodwill has been allocated.
An impairment loss is recognized if the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit (or group of cash-generating units) to which goodwill has been allocated is less than the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit (or group of cash-generating units). Any impairment loss is allocated first to goodwill. Impairment losses recognized for goodwill cannot be reversed in subsequent periods.
The discounted cash flow method is used to determine the recoverable amount (value in use) of a cash-generating unit or the group of cash-generating units to which goodwill is allocated. The projected cash flows are derived from the budget for the next five years and do not include restructuring activities to which we are not yet committed or significant future investments that will enhance the performance of the assets of our cash-generating unit being tested. The recoverable amount is sensitive to key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount, including discount rates and future growth rate. The discount rates are calculated based on a risk-free rate of interest and a market risk premium. The discount rates reflect the current market assessment of the risks specific to each group of our cash-generating units by taking into account specific group information on beta factors, leverage and cost of debt. We performed annual impairment tests as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 and did not identify any impairments.
| ii. | Investment in associate or joint venture using the equity method: |
After application of the equity method, we determine whether it is necessary to recognize any additional impairment loss with respect to the investment in associates or joint ventures. We determine at each reporting date whether there is objective evidence that the carrying amount of the investment in the associate or the joint venture is impaired. The test of impairment is carried out with reference to the entire investment, including the goodwill attributed to the associate or the joint venture.
| iii. | Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life / capitalized development costs that have not yet been systematically amortized: |
The impairment test is performed annually, on December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that there is an impairment.
During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023, and 2024 no impairment indicators were identified.
Financial instruments:
| A. | Financial assets: |
Financial assets are measured upon initial recognition at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial assets, except for financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss in respect of which transaction costs are recorded in profit or loss.
145
| B. | Financial liabilities: |
| i. | Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost |
Financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value less transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issue of the financial liability. After initial recognition, we measure all financial liabilities at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, except for:
| ● | Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, such as derivatives; |
| ● | Financial liabilities that arise when a transfer of a financial asset does not qualify for derecognition or when the continuing involvement approach applies; |
| ● | Financial guarantee contracts; |
| ● | Contingent consideration recognized by an acquirer in a business combination as to which IFRS 3 applies. |
| ii. | Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss: |
At initial recognition, we measure financial liabilities that are not measured at amortized cost at fair value. Transaction costs are recognized in profit or loss. After initial recognition, changes in fair value are recognized in profit or loss.
| C. | Derecognition of financial liabilities: |
A financial liability is derecognized when it is extinguished, that is, when the obligation is discharged or cancelled or expires. A financial liability is extinguished when the debtor discharges the liability by paying in cash, other financial assets, goods or services or is legally released from the liability. When there is a modification to the terms of an existing financial liability, we evaluate whether the modification is substantial.
If the terms of an existing financial liability are substantially modified, such modification is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference between the carrying amounts of the above liabilities is recognized in profit or loss.
If the modification is not substantial, we recalculate the carrying amount of the liability by discounting the revised cash flows at the original effective interest rate and any resulting difference is recognized in profit or loss.
| D. | Compound financial instruments: |
| i. | Convertible debentures which contain both an equity component and a liability component are separated into two components. This separation is performed by first determining the liability component based on the fair value of an equivalent non-convertible liability. The value of the conversion component is determined to be the residual amount. Directly attributable transaction costs are apportioned between the equity component and the liability component based on the allocation of proceeds to the equity and liability components. |
| ii. | Convertible debentures that are denominated in foreign currency contain two components: the conversion component and the debt component. The liability conversion component is initially recognized as a financial derivative at fair value. The balance is attributed to the debt component. Directly attributable transaction costs are allocated between the liability conversion component and the liability debt component based on the allocation of the proceeds to each component. |
146
| E. | Put option granted to non-controlling interests: |
When we grant to non-controlling interests a put option to sell part or all of their interests in a subsidiary, during a certain period, even if such purchase obligation is conditional on the counterparty’s exercise of its contractual right to cause such redemption, if the put option agreement does not transfer to us any benefits incidental to ownership of the equity instrument (i.e. the we do not have a present ownership in the shares concerned) then at the end of each reporting period the non-controlling interests (to which a portion of net profit attributable to non-controlling interests is allocated) are classified as a financial liability, as if such put-able equity instrument was redeemed on that date. The difference between the non-controlling interests carrying amount at the end of the reporting period and the present value of the liability is recognized directly in our equity, under “Additional paid-in capital”.
We remeasure the financial liability at the end of each reporting period based on the estimated present value of the consideration to be transferred upon the exercise of the put option.
If the option is exercised in subsequent periods, the consideration paid upon exercise is treated as settlement of the liability. If the put option expires, the liability is settled and a portion of the investment in the subsidiary disposed of, without loss of control therein.
If we have present ownership of the non-controlling interests, these non-controlling interests are accounted for as if they are held by us, and changes in the amount of the liability are carried to profit or loss.
Fair value measurement:
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurement is based on the assumption that the transaction will take place in the asset’s or the liability’s principal market, or in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. Fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant’s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities measured at fair value or for which fair value is disclosed are categorized into levels within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the entire fair value measurement:
| Level 1 | - | quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| Level 2 | - | inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable directly or indirectly. |
| Level 3 | - | inputs that are not based on observable market data (valuation techniques which use inputs that are not based on observable market data). |
Provisions:
A provision in accordance with IAS 37 is recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are measured according to the estimated future cash flows discounted using a pre-tax interest rate that reflects the market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, those risks specific to the liability. When the Group expects part or all of the expense to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense is recognized in the statement of profit or loss net of any reimbursement.
147
The following are the types of provisions included in our financial statements:
| i. | Legal claims: |
A provision for claims is recognized when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is more likely than not that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required by the Group to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
| ii. | Contingent liability recognized in a business combination: |
A contingent liability in a business combination is measured at fair value upon initial recognition. In subsequent periods, it is measured at the higher of the amount initially recognized less, when appropriate, cumulative amortization, and the amount that would be recognized at the end of the reporting period in accordance with IAS 37.
Employee benefit liabilities:
The Group maintains several employee benefit plans. We describe the accounting treatment for various types of benefits under those plans below:
| i. | Short-term employee benefits: |
Short-term employee benefits are benefits that are expected to be settled wholly before twelve (12) months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the employees render the related services. These benefits include salaries, paid annual leave, paid sick leave, recreation and social security contributions and are recognized as expenses as the services are rendered. A liability in respect of a cash bonus or a profit-sharing plan is recognized when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation to make such payment as a result of past service rendered by an employee and a reliable estimate of the amount can be made. The short-term employee benefit liability in the statement of financial position is measured on an undiscounted basis.
| ii. | Post-employment benefits: |
The plans are normally financed by contributions to insurance companies and classified as defined contribution plans or as defined benefit plans. Formula’s and its Israeli subsidiaries and associates accounted for at equity (as defined with respect to their Israeli employee contribution plans pursuant to section 14 of Israel’s Severance Pay Law, 1963 (the “Severance Pay Law”)) pay fixed contributions to those plans and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions if the fund into which those contributions are paid does not hold sufficient amounts to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods. Contributions to the defined contribution plan in respect of severance or retirement pay are recognized as an expense when contributed concurrently with performance of the employee’s services.
Formula and its Israeli subsidiaries and companies accounted for at equity also operate a defined benefit plan in respect of severance or retirement pay to their Israeli employees pursuant to the Severance Pay Law. According to the Severance Pay Law, employees are entitled to severance pay upon dismissal or retirement. The liability for termination of employment is measured using the projected unit credit method. The actuarial assumptions include rates of employee turnover and future salary increases based on the estimated timing of payment. The amounts are presented based on discounted expected future cash flows using a discount rate determined by reference to market yields at the reporting date on high quality corporate bonds that are linked to Israel’s Consumer Price Index with a term that is consistent with the estimated term of the severance pay obligation. In respect of its severance pay obligation to certain of its employees, the Group makes current deposits in pension funds and insurance companies (the “plan assets”). Plan assets comprise assets held by a long-term employee benefit fund or qualifying insurance policies. Plan assets are not available to the Group’s own creditors and cannot be returned directly to the Group.
148
The liability for employee benefits shown in the statement of financial position reflects the present value of the defined benefit obligation, less the fair value of the plan assets. Remeasurements of the net liability are recognized in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur.
| iii. | Other long-term employee benefits: |
Certain employees of the Group are entitled to benefits in respect of adaptation grants. These benefits are accounted for as other long-term benefits since the Group estimates that these benefits will be utilized and the Group’s respective obligation will be settled during the employment period and more than twelve months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the employees rendered the related service.
The Group’s net obligation for other long-term employee benefits, which is computed based on actuarial assumptions, is for the future benefit due to employees for services rendered in the current period and in prior periods and considering expected salary increases. The amount of these benefits is discounted to its present value. The discount rate is determined by reference at the reporting date to market yields on high quality corporate bonds that are linked to the Consumer Price Index and whose term is consistent with the term of the Group’s obligation.
Remeasurement of the net obligation is recognized in the statement of comprehensive income in the incurred period.
Share-based payment transactions
Our employees and certain service providers are entitled to remuneration in the form of equity-settled share-based payment transactions. The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured at the fair value of the equity instruments granted at grant date. The fair value is determined using an acceptable option pricing model. As for other service providers, the cost of the transactions is measured at the fair value of the goods or services received as consideration for equity instruments granted.
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognized in profit or loss together with a corresponding increase in equity during the period which the performance and/or service conditions are to be satisfied ending on the date on which the relevant employees become entitled to the award (the “vesting period”). The cumulative expense recognized for equity-settled transactions at the end of each reporting period until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and our best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest.
No expense is recognized for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other vesting conditions (service and/or performance) are satisfied.
If we modify the conditions on which equity-instruments were granted, an additional expense is recognized for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement or is otherwise beneficial to the employee/other service provider at the modification date.
149
If a grant of an equity instrument is canceled, it is accounted for as if it had vested on the cancelation date and any expense not yet recognized for the grant is recognized immediately. However, if a new grant replaces the canceled grant and is identified as a replacement grant on the grant date, the canceled and new grants are accounted for as a modification of the original grant, as described above.
Concentration of credit risk:
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Group to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposits, restricted cash, trade receivables.
The majority of the Group’s cash and cash equivalents, deposits, and other financial instruments are invested with major banks in Israel, the United States and across Europe. Management believes that these financial instruments are held in financial institutions with high credit standing, and accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these investments. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits in the United States may be in excess of insured limits and are not insured in other jurisdictions. Generally, these banks deposits may be redeemed upon demand and therefore bear minimal risk.
The Group’s trade receivables are generally derived from sales to large organizations located mainly in Israel, North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. The Group performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers using a reliable outside source to determine payment terms and credit limits which are approved based on the size of the customer and to date has not experienced any material losses. In certain circumstances, Formula and its subsidiaries and companies accounted for at equity may require letters of credit, other collateral or additional guarantees. From time to time, the Group’s subsidiaries sell certain of their accounts receivable to financial institutions, within the normal course of business. The Group maintains an allowance for credit losses based upon management’s experience and estimate of collectability of each outstanding invoice. The allowance for credit losses is determined with respect to specific debts or which collection is doubtful. The risk of collection associated with accounts receivable is mitigated by the diversity and number of customers.
Liquidity risk:
Liquidity risk arises from managing the Group’s working capital as well as from financial expenses and principal payments of the Group’s debt instruments. Liquidity risk consists of the risk that the Group will have difficulty in fulfilling obligations relating to financial liabilities. The Group’s policy is to ascertain constant cash adequacy needed for settling its liabilities when due. For this purpose, the Group aims to hold cash balances (or adequate credit lines) that will meet anticipated demands.
Formula and its subsidiaries and companies accounted for at equity examine cash flow forecasts on a monthly basis as well as information regarding cash balances. As of the reporting date, these forecasts indicate that the Group can expect sufficient liquid sources for covering its entire liabilities under reasonable assumptions.
Changes in accounting policies - initial adoption of new financial reporting and accounting standards
| 1. | Amendment to IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements”: |
In January 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements” regarding the criteria for determining the classification of liabilities as current or non-current (the “Original Amendment”). In October 2022, the IASB issued a subsequent amendment (the “Subsequent Amendment”).
150
According to the Subsequent Amendment:
| ● | Only financial covenants with which an entity must comply on or before the reporting date will affect a liability’s classification as current or non-current; | |
| ● | In respect of a liability for which compliance with financial covenants is to be evaluated within twelve months from the reporting date, disclosure is required to enable users of the financial statements to assess the risks related to that liability. The Subsequent Amendment requires disclosure of the carrying amount of the liability, information about the financial covenants, and the facts and circumstances at the end of the reporting period that could result in the conclusion that the entity may have difficulty in complying with the financial covenants. |
According to the Original Amendment, the conversion option of a liability affects the classification of the entire liability as current or non-current unless the conversion component is an equity instrument. The Original Amendment and Subsequent Amendment are both effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024 and must be applied retrospectively.
The Company applied amendments related to the Subsequent Amendment in the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The Amendments did not have material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
| 2. | Amendments to IAS 7, “Statement of Cash Flows”, and IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures”: |
In May 2023, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 7, “Statement of Cash Flows”, and IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures” (the “Amendments”) to address the presentation of liabilities and the associated cash flows arising out of supplier finance arrangements, as well as disclosures required for such arrangements. The disclosure requirements in the Amendments are intended to assist users of financial statements in understanding the effects of supplier finance arrangements on an entity’s liabilities, cash flows and exposure to liquidity risk. The Amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024.
The Amendments did not have material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Disclosure of Newly Issued but Not Yet Effective IFRS Standards
| 3. | Amendments to IAS 21, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”: |
In August 2023, the IASB issued “Amendments to IAS 21: Lack of Exchangeability (Amendments to IAS 21, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”)” (the “Amendments”) to clarify how an entity should assess whether a currency is exchangeable and how it should measure and determine a spot exchange rate when exchangeability is lacking. The Amendments set out the requirements for determining the spot exchange rate when a currency lacks exchangeability. The Amendments require disclosure of information that will enable users of financial statements to understand how a currency not being exchangeable affects or is expected to affect the entity’s financial performance, financial position and cash flows. The Amendments apply for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2025. Earlier adoption is permitted, in which case, an entity is required to disclose that fact. When applying the Amendments, an entity should not restate comparative information. Instead, if the foreign currency is not exchangeable at the beginning of the annual reporting period in which the Amendments are first applied (the initial application date), the entity should translate affected assets, liabilities and equity as required by the Amendments and recognize the differences as of the initial application date as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and/or to the foreign currency translation reserve, as required by the Amendments. We are assessing the impact of the new standard, including the effects of the amendments to other accounting standards resulting from the new standard, on the consolidated financial statements.
151
| 4. | International Financial Reporting Standard 18 – “Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements”: |
In April 2024, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued International Financial Reporting Standard 18 (IFRS 18), Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements (the “new standard”), which replaces International Accounting Standard 1 (IAS 1), Presentation of Financial Statements (“IAS 1”). The objective of the new standard is to enhance comparability and transparency in financial statements.
The new standard incorporates existing IAS 1 requirements as well as new presentation requirements for the statement of profit or loss, including the presentation of required subtotals and line items, disclosure of management-defined performance measures, and new requirements for aggregation and disaggregation of financial information.
The new standard does not change the recognition and measurement principles for items in the financial statements. However, since items in the statement of profit or loss must be classified into one of five categories (operating activities, investing activities, financing activities, income taxes, and discontinued operations), it may affect an entity’s operating profit. In addition, the issuance of the new standard has led to limited amendments to other accounting standards, including IAS 7, Statement of Cash Flows, and IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting.
The new standard is required to be applied retrospectively for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2027. According to the Israeli Securities Authority’s decision, early adoption is permitted, with disclosure required starting from periods beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
We are assessing the impact of the new standard, including the effects of the amendments to other accounting standards resulting from the new standard, on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
| A. | Directors and Senior Management |
The following table sets forth information about our directors and senior management as of May 15, 2025.
| Name | Age | Position | Expiration of Current Term of Directorship/Office | |||
| Guy Bernstein | 57 | Chief Executive Officer | No formal arrangement regarding expiration of term of office | |||
| Asaf Berenstein | 47 | Chief Financial Officer | No formal arrangement regarding expiration of term of office | |||
| Maya Solomon-Ella | 47 | Chief Operational Officer | No formal arrangement regarding expiration of term of office | |||
| Tammy Ohana Koll | 49 | Chief Technology Officer at Formula Systems and Chief Executive Officer of the Michpal Group | No formal arrangement regarding expiration of term of office | |||
| Marek Panek | 55 | Chairman of the Board of Directors | 2025 annual shareholders meeting | |||
| Rafal Kozlowski | 51 | Director | 2025 annual shareholders meeting | |||
| Tomer Jacob(1) (2) (3) | 53 | External director | May 2025 | |||
| Relly Danon(1) (2) (3) | 54 | External director | May 2025 | |||
| Karolina Rzonca-Bajorek | 39 | Director | 2025 annual shareholders meeting | |||
| Gabriela Żukowicz | 50 | Director | 2025 annual shareholders meeting | |||
| Itay Meroz(1)(3) | 55 | Director | 2025 annual shareholders meeting |
| (1) | Serves on the audit committee of our board of directors. |
| (2) | Serves as an external director under the Companies Law. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices—External Directors under the Companies Law; Audit Committee; Internal Auditor; Approval of Certain Transactions under the Companies Law,” below. |
| (3) | Serves on the compensation committee of our board of directors. |
152
Senior Management
Guy Bernstein has served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 2008. Mr. Bernstein served as a member of our board of directors from November 2006 to December 2008. Mr. Bernstein served as a director of Emblaze Ltd., or Emblaze, our former controlling shareholder and a publicly traded company listed on the London Stock Exchange, from April 2004 until February 2011. From December 2006 to November 2010, Mr. Bernstein also served as chief executive officer of Emblaze, and, prior thereto, from April 2004 to December 2006, as the chief financial officer of Emblaze. Mr. Bernstein serves as the chairman of the board of directors of each of Matrix and Sapiens and as chief executive officer and director of Magic Software, where he served as the chief financial and operations officer from 1999 until 2004, when he joined Emblaze. He joined Magic Software from Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global, where he served as senior manager from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Bernstein also serves as a director of Michpal Micro Computers (1983) Ltd., a director at TSG IT Advanced Systems Ltd., and is a director at InSync staffing, all of them are subsidiaries of Formula Systems Mr. Bernstein holds a B.A. degree in accounting and economics from the College of Management Academic Studies and is a certified public accountant in Israel.
Asaf Berenstin has served as our Chief Financial Officer since November 2011. Mr. Berenstin also serves as the Chief Financial Officer of our subsidiary, Magic Software, since April 2010. Prior to such time, beginning in August 2008, Mr. Berenstin served as Magic Software’s corporate controller. Mr. Berenstin also serves as a director of Michpal Micro Computers (1983) Ltd., a director at TSG IT Advanced Systems Ltd., and is a director at InSync staffing, all of them are subsidiaries of Formula Systems. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Berenstin served as a controller at Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (Nasdaq: GILT), commencing in July 2007. From October 2003 to July 2007, Mr. Berenstin practiced as a certified public accountant at Kesselman & Kesselman, a member of PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Berenstin holds a B.A. degree in accounting and economics and an M.B.A. degree, both from Tel-Aviv University, and is a certified public accountant (CPA) in Israel.
Tammy Ohana Koll has served as our Chief Technology Officer at Formula Systems and Chief Executive Officer of the Michpal Group since March 2023. Ms. Ohana Koll holds over 20 years of experience in the technology industry. Prior to joining our Company, Ms. Ohana Koll was Deputy Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Information Officer at Migdal Insurance & Finance Group for a term of 6 years. Ms. Ohana Koll was also Vise President of R&D at Migdal Insurance Company Ltd. for term of 6 years prior to becoming Chief Information Officer. Earlier in her career, Ms. Ohana Koll held the position of Vise President of product at Malam Payroll for term of 10 years. She holds a B.A. degree in Computer Science from Sapir College.
Maya Solomon-Ella has served as our Chief Operational Officer since September 2016. In her last position Maya served as the Transaction Support leader in Ernst& Young Israel (Tel-Aviv branch). Maya served in Ernst & Young 13 years, three of which were with the Assurance Services team (Hi Tech) and 10 of which have been spent in the Transaction Advisory Services (TAS) group. Since joining the TAS group at Ernst & Young, Ms. Solomon-Ella has been involved in M&A transactions across the globe. Ms. Solomon-Ella holds a B.A. degree in Economics-Accounting from Bar Ilan University and is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) in Israel.
153
Directors
Marek Panek has served as one of our directors since November 2010. Since January 2007 he has been the Executive Board Member of Asseco Poland S.A. and he is responsible for supervising the Capital Group Development Division and the EU Projects Office. Mr. Panek also holds and has held several other positions at Asseco and its affiliates, including Executive Board Member in Asseco International, a.s. (since October 2017), Supervisory Board Member of Asseco Central Europe, a.s. (since September 2011), Supervisory Board Member of Asseco Lietuva UAB (since June 2011), Chairman of GSTN Consulting Sp. Z o.o. (since November 2017), Supervisory Board Member of Asseco Innovation Fund Sp. Z o.o. (since December 2018), Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Nextbank Software (since March 2019) and Supervisory Board Member of adesso banking solutions GMBH (since September 2020). Mr. Panek first joined Asseco in 1995, having served in the following positions for the following periods of time: Marketing Specialist (from September 1995 to September 1996), Marketing Director (from October 1996 to March 2003), Sales and Marketing Director (from April 2003 to March 2004) and Member of the Board, Sales and Marketing Director (from March 2004 to January 2007). Prior to joining Asseco, Mr. Panek was employed at the ZE Gantel Sp. Z o.o. from 1993 to 1995. Mr. Panek graduated from the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics of the Rzeszów University of Technology in 1994, having been awarded a master’s degree in engineering.
Rafal Kozlowski has served as one of our directors since August 2012. From December 2020 Mr. Kozlowski has served as the President of the Management Board of Asseco Enterprise Solutions. From June 2012 to March 2021, Mr. Kozlowski has served as Vice President of the Management Board and Chief Financial Officer of Asseco Poland. From May 2008 to May 2012, Mr. Kozlowski served as Vice President of Asseco South Eastern Europe S.A. responsible for the company’s financial management. Mr. Kozlowski was directly involved in the acquisitions of companies incorporated within the holding of Asseco South Eastern Europe, as well as in the holding’s IPO process at the Warsaw Stock Exchange From 1996 to 1998, he served as Financial Director at Delta Software, and subsequently, from 1998 to 2003 as Senior Manager at Veraudyt. In the years 2004-2006, he was Head of Treasury Department at Softbank S.A. where he was delegated to act as Vice President of Finance at the company’s subsidiary Sawan S.A. From 2007 through June 2009, he served as Director of Controlling and Investment Division at Asseco Poland S.A. Mr. Kozlowski graduated of the University of Warsaw, obtaining Master’s degree at the Faculty of Organization and Management in 1998. He completed the Project Management Program organized by PMI in 2004, the International Accounting Standards Program organized by Ernst & Young Academy of Business in the years 2005-2006 and the Emerging CFO: Strategic Financial Leadership Program by Stanford GSB in 2019.
Relly Danon was elected to our board of directors as an external director in May 2022. Ms. Danon currently serves as legal counsel at Netline Communications Technologies (NCT) Ltd., a position held since 2000. In addition, Ms. Danon serves as an external director at Y.D. More Investments Ltd., a position held since 2017. From 2008 through 2017, Ms. Danon served as an external director at Mega Or Holdings Ltd. Ms. Danon also served as an external director at Jerusalem Technology Investments Ltd. from 2012 through 2014. From 2007 through 2009, Ms. Danon served as a director at Apex Portfolio Management Ltd. Ms. Danon holds a B.A. degree in law from Tel Aviv University.
Tomer Jacob was elected to our board of directors as an external director in May 2022. Mr. Jacob currently serves as a Managing Partner at Hanaco VC. From 2000 to 2021 Mr. Jacob served as a Managing Director at UBS. Mr. Jacob also currently serves as a director of Max, Israel’s second largest credit card company. Mr. Jacob holds a B.A. degree in Economics & Management and a B.Sc degree in Computer Science from the academic college of Tel Aviv–Jaffa.
Karolina Rzonca-Bajorek was elected to our board of directors in August 2022. Ms. Rzonca-Bajorek has served in various financial managerial capacities within the Asseco Group since 2015, and during the period from 2012 to 2014. Since April 2021, Ms. Rzonca-Bajorek has served as Vice President of Finance, and a member of the Management Board, of Asseco. Prior to that period, from 2019 through March 2021, Ms. Rzonca-Bajorek served as the Director of the Finance Division of the Asseco Group. Before that, from 2015 until 2019, Ms. Rzonca-Bajorek served as the Director of the Reporting Department of the Asseco Group. From 2014 to 2015, Ms. Rzonca-Bajorek was the Stock Exchange Reporting Expert at PHZ Baltona S.A. From 2012 to 2014 Ms. Rzonca-Bajorek worked at Asseco Poland S.A. as the Finance Specialist in the Reporting Department of the Asseco Group. She started her professional career in 2009 at Ernst & Young Audit Sp. Z o.o. in the audit department, where she participated in audits of large corporate clients. Ms. Rzonca-Bajorek is a graduate of the Warsaw School of Economics, the faculty of finance and accounting (specialization: corporate finance and accounting). Ms. Rzonca-Bajorek holds the FCCA title and a Certificate of the Minister of Finance of Poland authorizing her to provide accounting services, and is in the process of becoming a certified auditor.
154
Gabriela Żukowicz has served since October 1, 2017 as Vice President of the Management Board of Asseco Poland S.A. responsible for the Legal Office and the Management Office, as well as the Human Resources Division, the Personnel Administration Division, the Compliance Division, the Maintenance and Development of Internal Systems Division, the Administration Division and the Purchasing Division of Asseco. Also, since March 2023 she acts as Chief ESG Officer. Ms. Żukowicz has been working at Asseco Poland since 1998, serving as the Director of the Management Board Office (October 2004 – December 2009) and as the Director of the Legal and Organizational Department (January 2010 – October 2017). In addition, from August 2012 to September 2017, Ms. Żukowicz held the position of Asseco’s Proxy. She is the Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Park Wodny Sopot, the Vice Chairman of the Supervisory Board in Asseco Innovation Fund and the Member of the Supervisory Boards in the companies Asseco Western Europe and Asseco Lietuva. In 1998, Ms. Żukowicz graduated from the Faculty of Law of the Jagiellonian University in Kraków and completed her legal adviser’s training in 2002.
Itay Meroz was appointed as a director by our board of directors in May 2024. Mr. Meroz is an experienced executive manager with a significant financial background., Mr. Meroz has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Skyter Technologies, an online media company since 2021. From 2012 to 2021, Mr. Meroz served as the Chief Executive Officer of WhiteSmoke Software, an ad-tech company listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, after having served as its Chief Financial Officer from 2009 through 2012. Earlier in his career, he served as the Controller of Versaware Tech from 2001 to 2002. Mr. Meroz started his professional career in 1997 at Ernst & Young Israel, where he managed an audit team that audited corporate clients listed on the TASE, including in respect of U.S. GAAP-based financial statements. Mr. Meroz holds a B.A. in Business and Accounting from College of Management and was a certified public accountant (CPA).
Arrangements for the Election of Directors; Family Relationships
The previously disclosed October 2017 shareholders agreement between Asseco, our largest shareholder, and our chief executive officer, Mr. Guy Bernstein, under which Mr. Bernstein granted an irrecoverable proxy to vote an additional 1,797,973 of our ordinary shares to Asseco, was terminated on December 5, 2022. Asseco has significant influence over the election of the members of our board of directors (other than our external directors). Other than as described immediately above, there are no arrangements or understandings with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others pursuant to which any of our directors or members of senior management were selected as such.
Mr. Guy Bernstein and Mr. Asaf Berenstin are first cousins. Other than such relationship, there are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors.
| B. | Compensation |
Aggregate Compensation Paid to Directors and Executive Officers
Formula paid to its directors and executive officers, consisting of the individuals listed above in the table under “—Directors and Senior Management”, as well as Ohad Melnick (our former director who served until May 2024), direct remuneration and provided related benefits of approximately $12.4 million, in the aggregate, with respect to 2024. This aggregate compensation amount includes amounts set aside or accrued to provide pension, retirement or similar post-employment benefits, which themselves totaled $0.1 million in 2024. This aggregate compensation amount furthermore includes expenses recorded with respect to share-based compensation in a total amount of $7.0 million for 2024.
155
The above aggregate compensation amount does not, however, include the following:
| ● | expenses, including business travel, professional and business association dues and expenses, for which Formula reimburses its officers; and |
| ● | other fringe benefits that companies in Israel commonly reimburse or pay to their officers, |
as amounts incurred for such expenses and benefits in 2024 were paid in reimbursement of activities carried out by our directors and executive officers for strict business purposes in carrying out their duties on behalf of Formula and were therefore not compensatory in nature.
The above aggregate compensation amount includes payment of directors’ fees. Formula compensates its external directors and other directors in accordance with the regulations promulgated under the Companies Law.
Summary Compensation Table
For so long as we qualify as a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with the executive compensation disclosure requirements applicable to U.S. domestic companies, including the requirement to disclose information concerning the amount and type of compensation paid to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers on an individual basis. Nevertheless, regulations promulgated under the Companies Law require us to disclose the annual compensation of our five most highly compensated office holders (as defined in the Companies Law) on an individual basis. Under the Companies Law regulations, this disclosure is required to be included in the annual proxy statement for our annual meeting of shareholders, which we furnish to the SEC under cover of a Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K. Because of that disclosure requirement under Israeli law, we are also including that information in this annual report, pursuant to the disclosure requirements of Form 20-F.
The table below reflects the compensation paid to our five most highly compensated office holders (each of whom is a member of our management) during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2024. All amounts reported in the table reflect the cost to the Company, as recognized in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024
.
Compensation of Management(1)
| Name and Position(1) (2) | Salary ($, in thousands) | Benefits And Perquisites ($, in thousands)(4) | Variable Compensation ($, in thousands) | Equity Based Compensation ($, in thousands) (5) | ||||||||||||
| Guy Bernstein – CEO (6) | 578 | - | 3,641 | 6,438 | ||||||||||||
| Asaf Berenstin – CFO (3) | - | - | - | 249 | ||||||||||||
| Tammy Ohana Koll – CTO | 315 | 75 | 108 | - | ||||||||||||
| Maya Solomon-Ella – COO | 175 | 39 | 68 | 343 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | All amounts reported in the table are in terms of cost to Formula, as recorded in Formula’s financial statements. We have four office holders who are members of management who are compensated by Formula (CEO, CFO, CTO and COO). For disclosure concerning compensation paid by us to our remaining four most highly compensated office holders (all of whom are directors), please see the table under “Compensation of Directors” below. |
156
| (2) | The executive officers listed in the table serve as employees or consultants of Formula. Cash compensation amounts denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar were converted into U.S. dollars at the average conversion rate for 2024. |
| (3) | Our Chief Financial Officer, Asaf Berenstin, also serves as the chief financial officer of our subsidiary Magic Software. Pursuant to an agreement between Magic Software and Formula, Mr. Berenstin allocates 40%-50% of his time to Formula. Because he is not regularly compensated by Formula, except for variable compensation and share-based compensation, Mr. Berenstin salary is not listed in this table. As of January 1, 2021, for his role as our Chief Financial Officer and Magic Software chief financial officer Mr. Berenstin, is entitled to an annual bonus in an amount equal to 0.3% of our net profit (including capital gains). |
| (4) | Amounts reported in this column include benefits and perquisites, including those mandated by applicable law. Such benefits and perquisites may include, to the extent applicable to the executive officer, payments, contributions and/or allocations for savings funds, pension, severance, vacation, car or car allowance, medical insurances and benefits, risk insurances (e.g., life, disability, accident), convalescence pay, payments for social security, tax gross-up payments and other benefits and perquisites consistent with our guidelines. |
| (5) | Amounts reported in this column represent the expense recorded in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024 with respect to share-based compensation. Assumptions and key variables used in the calculation of such amounts are described in Note 18(b) to our consolidated financial statements, contained elsewhere in this annual report. |
| (6) | Under his service agreement with us, our Chief Executive Officer is entitled to an annual bonus in an amount equal to 3.3% of our net profit (including capital gains) after tax. Additionally, Mr. Bernstein’s variable compensation includes payments due with respect to 611,771 RSUs granted to him by Formula in consideration of dividends that Formula distributes to its shareholders in an amount equal to the pro-rata portion of the overall dividend amount that the RSUs constitute out of the issued and outstanding share capital of the Company as of the date of the distribution. For the purpose of payment of the dividend amounts, the portion of the dividend amount to be released to Mr. Bernstein, will in each case be based on the proportion of the number of fiscal quarters that have lapsed at the time of distribution of the dividend from January 1, 2020 until December 31, 2027. An advance of 70% of the estimated annual bonus with respect to each year is paid over the course of the year, divided into quarterly installments, which is estimated based on our quarterly financial statements and is subject to final adjustment at the end of the year. |
Compensation of Directors
The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation of our directors (none of whom served as an employee of our company) during fiscal year 2024. The fees to the directors were paid by Formula.
| Name and Position | Total Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | |||
| Marek Panek – Chairman | 40,400 | |||
| Rafal Kozlowski – Director | 40,400 | |||
| Ohad Melnick – Director(2) | 11,100 | |||
| Karolina Rzonca-Bajorek– Director | 41,530 | |||
| Gabriela Żukowicz– Director | 40,400 | |||
| Tomer Jacob - External Director | 72,110 | |||
| Relly Danon - External Director | 48,800 | |||
| Itay Meroz– Director(3) | 29,900 | |||
| (1) | All amounts reported in the table are in terms of cost to Formula, as recorded in Formula’s financial statements. |
| (2) | Mr. Melnick served as a director from the start of 2024 until our annual general meeting of shareholders that took place on May 9, 2024, at which time he was not re-elected. The total fees earned by him as shown in the table reflect that partial-year period. |
| (3) | Mr. Meroz was first appointed as a director by our board of directors to fill Mr. Melnick’s vacated board seat on May 21, 2024. The total fees earned by him as shown in the table reflect the partial-year period from that date through the end of 2024. |
157
Service Agreement with, and Equity Grant to, Chief Executive Officer
Under his service agreement with us, Mr. Guy Bernstein, as our chief executive officer, or CEO, is entitled to a monthly salary, as well as an annual bonus in an amount equal to 3.3% of our net profit (including capital gains). An advance of 70% of the estimated bonus with respect to each year is paid over the course of the year, divided into quarterly installments, which is estimated based on our quarterly financial statements and is subject to final adjustment at the end of the year.
Mr. Guy Bernstein has furthermore been granted by us 611,771 restricted share units, or RSUs, which may be settled for 611,771 ordinary shares of Formula. The terms of the grant were described in Proposal 2 of the proxy statement for our January 12, 2023 special general meeting of shareholders, which served as Exhibit 99.1 to Formula’s Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K furnished to the SEC on December 8, 2022 and viewable at the following link: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045986/000121390022078501/ea169849ex99-1_formulasys.htm.
The subject grant had been initially re-approved by our compensation committee and board of directors, acting in accordance with the Companies Law, in November 2020 after Formula’s shareholders did not approve the grant at Formula’s November 2, 2020 annual general meeting of shareholders. As re-approved by the compensation committee and board, the grant reflected a modified composition of time-based-vesting and performance-based-vesting RSUs in a ratio of 66.67%-33.33% (as opposed to the initial ratio of time-based-vesting to performance-based-vesting RSUs of 80%-20% that was rejected by Formula’s shareholders at that November 2020 annual general meeting of shareholders). The same modified RSU grant was furthermore re-approved by our compensation committee and board of directors, acting in accordance with the Companies Law, once again on January 15 and 16, 2023, respectively, after Formula’s January 12, 2023 special general meeting of shareholders did not re-approve the modified RSU grant.
In re-considering and re-approving the grant in November 2020 and January 2023, our compensation committee and board of directors acknowledged that the requisite majority of our shareholders for the approval of the subject grant had not been achieved at the applicable shareholder meeting. The committee and board nevertheless evaluated our Group’s performance and achievements under the management of our chief executive officer, and in view of his expected further contribution to the Group’s success, determined that the proposed grant is strongly linked to the Group’s performance and the resulting increase in shareholders’ value. Consequently, consistent with their authorities under the Companies Law, the compensation committee and board of directors approved the modified award of the RSUs.
The reasons for the re-approval of the subject grant in January 2023 (despite it already having been re-approved in November 2020) were two-fold:
| ● | Changed circumstances. The voting agreement between Asseco and our chief executive officer, which covered 1,797,973 of our ordinary shares owned by the chief executive officer, and by virtue of which Asseco formerly possessed the right to vote those shares— which stood at the heart of an allegation by plaintiffs who challenged the initial re-approval of the grant (as described below)— was cancelled on December 5, 2022; and |
158
| ● | Certainty. We believed that it was in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to provide clarity and certainty regarding the CEO’s compensation and position in the Company by bringing his equity-based grant for re-approval. |
Please see “Item 8.A Legal Proceedings” below for a description of the legal proceedings that have been brought in respect of our CEO’s RSU grant.
The award was granted to Emil Sharvit (2001) Consulting and Project Management Ltd., through which our chief executive officer provides services to us. 66.67% of the RSUs (i.e., 407,847 RSUs) are subject to time-based vesting that started as of the grant date and shall end at December 31, 2027, subject to the continued engagement of our chief executive officer with us as of that date, which we refer to as the Vesting Period; and up to 33.33% of the RSUs (i.e., 203,924 RSUs as of the date hereof) are subject to performance-based vesting, and shall vest at December 31, 2027 on a pro-rata basis with respect to each fiscal year (starting as of January 1, 2020) during the Vesting Period in which the Target EBITDA (as defined below) is achieved, subject to the continued engagement of our chief executive officer with us. At the end of the vesting period, the number of performance-based RSUs that vests shall be equal to (i) the number of fiscal years in which the Target EBITDA was achieved multiplied by (ii) 25,490.50 RSUs (rounded to the nearest whole number, up to a cap of 203,924 RSUs in total).
The “Target EBITDA” in a given fiscal year during the Vesting Period shall mean our EBITDA in that certain fiscal year (as reflected in the our annual audited consolidated financial statements), excluding the cost attributed to the applicable portion of the RSUs in the our annual audited consolidated financial statements for the applicable fiscal year (as to which the review of performance is made to determine whether one eighth of the Performance Based RSUs (i.e., 25,490.50 RSUs) shall become vested at the end of the Vesting Period). The Target EBITDA shall be not less than 105% of 75% of our consolidated EBITDA in the previous fiscal year, excluding the cost attributed to the applicable portion of the RSUs in our annual audited consolidated financial statements for such previous fiscal year (the “Previous Year”). Such examination of EBITDA shall be made on the basis of the our annual audited consolidated financial statements as reflected in our annual report on Form 20-F, and in the event that we sells any of our operations, the Target EBITDA shall be adjusted as applicable for future reference by removing the results of the operations that were sold.
In the event that with respect to any specific fiscal year (the “Specific Year”), the Target EBITDA is not achieved, the Target EBITDA with respect to such Specific Year will still be deemed to have been met for the purpose of vesting of RSUs in the event that either: (i) the EBITDA in the fiscal year immediately following the Specific Year was at least 110.25% of 75% of our EBITDA in the year preceding the Specific Year, or (ii) in case that the condition in the foregoing clause (i) was not met, then the EBITDA in the second fiscal year following the Specific Year was at least 115.7625% of 75% of our EBITDA in the year preceding the Specific Year. Accordingly, in case that either clause (i) or (ii) was met for a certain Specific Year, then the vesting with respect to such Specific Year shall be deemed to have been achieved, and those RSUs shall become vested as of the end of the Vesting Period. In the event that neither of the conditions described in clauses (i) or (ii) was met, the portion of RSUs for the applicable Specific Year shall automatically expire and terminate.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in case the Target EBITDA is met (in accordance with the above terms) in a certain fiscal year, yet the Target EBITDA is less than 105% of 75% of the average EBITDA for the three fiscal years that consist of the subject fiscal year and the two preceding years (excluding the cost attributed to the applicable portion of the RSUs in our annual audited consolidated financial statements for such applicable fiscal years), then regardless of meeting the Target EBITDA, the number of performance-based RSUs that vests shall be reduced by 20%.
159
In addition to the RSU grant terms described above, our board of directors has approved, following the approval by Formula’s compensation committee, an adjustment to the above-described RSU grant based on dividends that we distribute to our shareholders. During the Vesting Period of the RSUs, in the event that any dividend, in cash or in kind, is distributed to our shareholders, then in addition to the distribution to all shareholders, there will be an equivalent payment to our chief executive officer with respect to all RSUs that were not converted into shares (whether or not vested) in an amount equal to the pro-rata portion of the overall dividend amount that the RSUs constitute out of our issued and outstanding share capital as of the date of the distribution. For those purposes, the RSUs will be counted as if they are already vested and converted into shares. These special RSU dividend amounts shall be paid and/or set aside by us for the benefit of our chief executive officer, all as described below.
For the purpose of payment of the dividend amounts to our chief executive officer, the Vesting Period shall be regarded as if it has commenced on January 1, 2021 (other than with respect to distributions and any related dividend amount which were made prior to the grant of the RSUs and which are explicitly excluded), and will be divided into 32 fiscal quarters (each referred to as a Fiscal Quarter). The dividend amount within each dividend distributed to our shareholders will be released to, or set aside for, our chief executive officer together with the distribution of the dividend. The portion of the dividend amount to be released to our chief executive officer will in each case be based on the number of Fiscal Quarters that have lapsed at the time of distribution of the dividend. The remainder of the dividend amount will be set aside and paid to our chief executive officer on a pro-rata basis upon the expiration of each Fiscal Quarter until the dividend amount is released in full at the end of the Vesting Period for the RSUs.
In the event of termination of our chief executive officer services agreement, by us for Cause (as defined in the services agreement), the RSUs will immediately terminate and become null and void, and all interests and rights of our chief executive officer in and to the same will expire. In case of termination of our chief executive officer services agreement by us not for Cause, or due to the resignation of our chief executive officer for Good Reason, all unvested RSUs that could have vested from the grant date until December 31, 2027, assuming all performance and time conditions and future targets would have been fulfilled (including all targets that would have resulted in vesting with respect to any Previous Year which could have still been met in future years), will accelerate and become immediately vested and exercisable, regardless of the actual occurrence or failure to occur of any of the future performance targets relating to those RSUs.
In the event of resignation by our chief executive officer not for Good Reason, our chief executive officer RSUs will vest, in an accelerated manner, in such portion equal to the pro-rata portion of the Vesting Period that has already lapsed (based on the full number of Fiscal Quarters that have lapsed from January 1, 2020, until the actual resignation date, including notice period). However, any performance-based RSUs for which the applicable target was not achieved up until the resignation date (including the notice period) will expire and terminate.
Restricted Share Grants to Chief Financial Officer
On March 13, and 14, 2021, our compensation committee and board of directors, respectively, acting in accordance with the Companies Law, awarded our chief financial officer, Asaf Berenstin, 21,000 restricted shares under our 2021 Share Incentive Plan (which is described below in Item 6.E in the section titled “Formula’s 2021 Share Incentive Plan”). These restricted shares vest on a quarterly basis over approximately five-year period, with 3,750 restricted shares, approximately 18% of the grant, vesting on the grant date with the remaining amount vested in 23 quarterly equal amounts of 750 restricted shares per quarter commencing on June 30, 2022 and concluding on December 31, 2027, provided that during such time the chief financial officer continues to serve as (i) an officer of the Company and/or (ii) an officer in one of our directly held affiliates. If he fails to meet the service condition due to the request of the board of directors of either Formula or any of its directly held affiliates (other than a termination of his provision of services which is based on actions or omissions by him that will constitute “cause” under his grant agreement with Formula); then, the chief financial officer will be deemed to have complied with clauses (i) or (ii) above. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a change of control of Formula occurs, then all unvested additional restricted shares will immediately become vested. As of April 30, 2025, 12,750 out of the 21,000 restricted shares had vested.
160
Restricted Share Grants to Chief Operations Officer
On January 15 and 16, 2023, our compensation committee and board of directors, respectively, acting in accordance with the Companies Law, awarded our chief operational officer, Maya Solomon, 15,000 restricted shares under the 2021 Plan. These restricted shares vest at certain points in time over a seven-year period, which commenced on January 16, 2023 and concluding on December 31, 2029, provided that during such time the chief operational officer continued to serve as (i) an officer of the Company and/or (ii) an officer in one of our directly held affiliates (we refer to this as the Service Condition). As of April 30, 2025, 4,285 of the 15,000 restricted shares had vested.
For a description of our 2011 Share Incentive Plan and our 2021 Share Incentive Plan pursuant to which options or share awards may be granted from time to time to our directors, executive officers, employees and consultants, see “Item 6.E. Share Ownership— Arrangements Involving the Issuance or Grant of Equity Awards” below.
| C. | Board Practices |
Pursuant to our amended and restated articles of association, or our articles, directors are generally elected at the annual general meeting of shareholders by a vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power represented at the meeting. Our existing board of directors may also appoint a new director to the board, assuming that the then-authorized size of the board, as last approved by our shareholders, exceeds the number of directors then serving on the board, whether due to a resignation or otherwise, in which case the newly appointed director holds office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders immediately following such appointment.
Our board is currently comprised of seven persons, of which each of Tomer Jacob, Relly Danon, and Itay Meroz has been determined by the board to be independent within the meaning of the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market (or the Nasdaq listing rules), on which our ADSs are listed for trading. Concurrently with the initial election of Ms. Karolina Rzonca-Bajorek and Ms. Gabriela Żukowicz to the board in August 2022, we opted, as a foreign private issuer under SEC rules, to follow Israeli law practice in lieu of the Nasdaq majority board independence requirement. Please see Item 16G below. Mr. Jacob and Ms. Danon serve as our external directors as mandated under Israeli law, and are therefore subject to additional criteria to help ensure their independence. See “External Directors Under the Companies Law” below. Each of our directors, except for the external directors, holds office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders and may then be re-elected. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors.
Under the Companies Law, a person who lacks the necessary qualifications and the ability to devote an appropriate amount of time to the performance of his or her duties as a director shall not be appointed director of a publicly traded company. While determining a person’s compliance with such provisions, the company’s special requirements and its scope of business shall be taken into consideration. Where the agenda of a shareholders meeting of a publicly traded company includes the appointment of directors, each director nominee should submit a declaration to the company confirming that he or she has the necessary qualifications and that he or she is able to devote an appropriate amount of time to performance of his or her duties as a director. In the declaration, the director nominee should specify his or her qualifications and confirm that the restrictions set out in the Companies Law do not apply.
Under the Companies Law, if a director ceases to comply with any of the requirements provided in the Companies Law, such director must immediately notify the company, and his or her term of service shall terminate on the date of the notice.
External Directors Under the Companies Law
Under the Companies Law, companies incorporated under the laws of Israel whose shares have been offered to the public in or outside of Israel, are generally required to appoint at least two external directors. Under regulations promulgated under the Companies Law, Israeli public companies whose shares are traded on certain U.S. stock exchanges, such as the Nasdaq Global Select Market, and that lack a controlling shareholder (as defined further below) are exempt from the requirement to appoint external directors. Any such company is also exempt from the Companies Law requirements related to the composition of the audit and compensation committees of the board. Eligibility for these exemptions is conditioned on compliance with U.S. stock exchange listing rules related to majority board independence and the composition of the audit and compensation committees of the board, as applicable to all listed domestic U.S. companies. Because we have a controlling shareholder as determined under the Companies Law (Asseco), we are not eligible for these exemptions under the subject regulations.
161
The Companies Law provides that a person may not be appointed as an external director if the person is a relative of the controlling shareholder of the company or if that person or his or her relative, partner, employer, another person to whom he or she was directly or indirectly subject, or any entity under the person’s control, has, as of the date of the person’s appointment to serve as external director, or had, during the two years preceding that date: (a) any affiliation or other disqualifying relationship with the company, with any person or entity controlling the company or a relative of such person, or with any entity controlled by or under common control with the company; or (b) in the case of a company with no shareholder holding 25% or more of its voting rights, had at the date of appointment as an external director, any affiliation or other disqualifying relationship with a person then serving as chairman of the board or chief executive officer, a holder of 5% or more of the issued share capital or voting power in the company or the most senior financial officer. The term “affiliation” and the similar types of prohibited relationships include:
| ● | an employment relationship; |
| ● | a business or professional relationship, even if not maintained on a regular basis (but excluding a de minimis level relationship); |
| ● | control; and |
| ● | service as an office holder. |
The term “office holder” is defined under the Companies Law as a general manager (i.e., chief executive officer), chief business manager, deputy general manager, vice general manager, any other person assuming the responsibilities of any of these positions regardless of that person’s title, a director and any other manager directly subordinate to the general manager.
No person may serve as an external director if the person’s position or other business activities create, or may create, a conflict of interest with the person’s responsibilities as an external director or may otherwise interfere with the person’s ability to serve as an external director or if the person is an employee of the Israel Securities Authority or of an Israeli stock exchange. A person may furthermore not continue to serve as an external director if he or she received, during his or her tenure as an external director, direct or indirect compensation from the company including amounts paid pursuant to indemnification or exculpation contracts or commitments and insurance coverage for his or her service as an external director, other than as permitted by the Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. If, at the time of election of an external director, all other directors who are not the company’s controlling persons or their relatives are of the same gender, the external director to be elected must be of the other gender. A director of one company may not be appointed as an external director of another company if a director of the other company is acting as an external director of the first company at such time.
External directors are elected by a majority vote at a shareholders’ meeting, provided that either:
| ● | such majority includes at least a majority of the shares held by all shareholders who are not controlling shareholders and do not have a conflict of interest (referred to under the Companies Law as a “personal interest”) in the election of the external director (other than a personal interest not deriving from a relationship with a controlling shareholder) that are voted at the meeting, excluding abstentions, to which we refer as a disinterested majority, or |
| ● | the total number of shares voted by non-controlling shareholders and by shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the election of the external director against the election of the external director does not exceed two percent (2%) of the aggregate voting rights in the company. |
162
According to regulations promulgated under the Companies Law, a person may be appointed as an external director only if he or she has professional qualifications or if he or she has accounting and financial expertise (each, as defined below). In addition, at least one of the external directors must be determined by our board of directors to have accounting and financial expertise. A director with “accounting and financial expertise” is a director that due to his or her education, experience and skills has a high expertise and understanding in financial and accounting matters and financial statements, in such a manner which allows him to deeply understand the financial statements of the company and initiate a discussion about the presentation of financial data. A director is deemed to have “professional qualifications” if he or she either (i) has an academic degree in economics, business management, accounting, law or public service, (ii) has an academic or other degree or has completed other higher education, all in the field of business of the company or relevant for his/her position, or (iii) has at least five years’ experience serving in one of the following capacities, or at least five years of cumulative experience serving in two or more of the following capacities: (a) a senior business management position in a company with a significant volume of business; (b) a senior position in the company’s primary field of business; or (c) a senior position in public administration or service. Our board of directors has determined that each of Mr. Jacob and Ms. Danon possesses requisite financial and accounting expertise, as required of our external directors under the Companies Law.
An external director may be removed from office only: (i) by a court, upon determination that the external director to be so removed ceased to meet the statutory qualifications for his or her appointment or if he or she violated his or her duty of loyalty to the company or (ii) by the same percentage of shareholders, acting through a shareholders meeting, as is required for his or her election, if the board of directors has determined that the external director to be so removed has ceased to meet the statutory qualifications for his or her appointment or violated his or her duty of loyalty to the company and has proposed the removal to the shareholders. An external director who ceases to meet the conditions for his or her service as such must notify the company immediately and such service shall cease immediately upon such notification.
The initial term of an external director is three years and may be extended by the general meeting of shareholders, for up to two additional three year terms, provided that (i) his or her service for each such additional term is recommended by one or more shareholders holding at least 1% of the company’s voting rights and is approved at a shareholders meeting by a disinterested majority, where the total number of shares held by non-controlling, disinterested shareholders voting for such reelection exceeds 2% of the aggregate voting rights in the company, provided that the external director and certain of his or her related parties meet additional independence requirements; or (ii) his or her service for each such additional term is recommended by the board of directors and is approved at a meeting of shareholders by the same majority required for the initial election of an external director.
In May 2022, Mr. Jacob and Ms. Danon were initially appointed for a three-year term as our external directors, each to hold office until May 2025. In accordance with the regulations under the Companies Law (Relief for Public Companies Whose Shares are Listed on a Stock Exchange Outside of Israel, 2000), dual listed companies, like us, whose securities are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market or one of a number of other non-Israeli stock exchanges, may re-appoint an external director for additional three-year terms, in excess of the nine years as described above, if the audit committee and the board of directors confirm that, due to the expertise and special contribution of the external director to the work of the board and its committees, his or her re-appointment is in the best interests of the company. The same special majority is required for election of the external director for each additional three-year term.
Each committee of a company’s board of directors is required to include at least one external director and the audit committee must include all of the external directors.
An external director is entitled to compensation as provided in regulations promulgated under the Companies Law and is otherwise prohibited from receiving any compensation, directly or indirectly, in connection with services provided as an external director or otherwise to the company.
163
Following the termination of an external director’s service on a board of directors, such former external director and his or her spouse and children may not be provided a direct or indirect benefit by the company, its controlling shareholder or any entity under its controlling shareholder’s control, including engagement to serve as an executive officer or director of the company or a company controlled by its controlling shareholder or employment by, or providing services to, any such company for consideration, either directly or indirectly, including through a corporation controlled by the former external director. This restriction extends for a period of two years with regard to the former external director and his or her spouse or child and for one year with respect to other relatives of the former external director.
Qualifications of Directors Generally Under the Companies Law
Under the Companies Law, the board of directors of a publicly traded company is required to make a determination as to the minimum number of directors (not merely external directors) who must have accounting and financial expertise (according to the same criteria described above with respect to external directors under “—External Directors Under the Companies Law”). In accordance with the Companies Law, the determination of the board should be based on, among other things, the type of company, its size, the volume and complexity of its activities and the number of directors. Based on the foregoing considerations, our board determined that the number of directors with financial and accounting expertise in our company shall not be less than one. As described above under “—External Directors Under the Companies Law,” currently Tomer Jacob, Rafal Kozlowski and Karolina Rzonca-Bajorek have been determined by the board to possess such accounting and financial expertise.
Unaffiliated Directors Under the Companies Law
Under the Companies Law, the audit committee of a publicly traded company must consist of a majority of unaffiliated directors. An “unaffiliated director” is defined as an external director or a director who meets the following criteria:
| ● | he or she meets the qualifications for being appointed as an external director, except for (i) the requirement that the director be an Israeli resident (which does not apply to companies whose securities have been offered outside of Israel or are listed outside of Israel) and (ii) the requirement for accounting and financial expertise or professional qualifications; and |
| ● | he or she has not served as a director of the company for a period exceeding nine consecutive years. For this purpose, a break of less than two years in the service shall not be deemed to interrupt the continuation of the service. |
Our audit committee complies with the foregoing required majority of unaffiliated directors.
Audit Committee
In addition to the foregoing requirement concerning the audit committee’s unaffiliated director members, the Companies Law also requires more generally that public companies such as ours must appoint an audit committee, comprised of at least three directors, including all of the external directors, one of whom must serve as chairman of the committee. The chairman of the board of directors, or any director employed by or otherwise providing services on a regular basis to the company or to a controlling shareholder or any entity controlled by a controlling shareholder, may not be a member of the audit committee. Under the Companies Law, our audit committee is responsible for (i) determining whether there are deficiencies in the business management practices of the company, including in consultation with the company’s internal auditor or the independent auditor, and making recommendations to the board of directors to improve such practices, (ii) determining whether to approve certain related party transactions, including transactions in which an office holder has a personal interest and whether such transaction is extraordinary or material, (iii) establishing the approval process (including, potentially, the approval of the audit committee) for certain transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, (iv) where the board of directors approves the working plan of the internal auditor, examining such working plan before its submission to the board and propose amendments thereto, (v) examining the company’s internal controls and internal auditor’s performance, including whether the internal auditor has sufficient resources and tools to dispose of his responsibilities (taking into consideration the company’s special needs and size), (vi) examining the scope of the company’s auditor’s work and compensation and submitting a recommendation with respect thereto to the board of directors or the general meeting of shareholders, depending on which of them is considering the appointment of our auditor and (vii) establishing procedures with respect to the handling of company employees’ complaints as to the management of the company’s business and the protection to be provided to such employees. In compliance with regulations under the Companies Law, our audit committee also approves our financial statements, thereby fulfilling the requirement that a board committee provide such approval. An audit committee may not approve an action requiring its approval, unless at the time of approval a majority of the committee’s members are present, of whom a majority consist of unaffiliated directors and at least one of them is an external director.
164
Like the Companies Law, the Nasdaq listing rules and U.S. securities laws also require that we maintain an audit committee, all of whose members are independent of management. In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Nasdaq requirements, our audit committee’s direct responsibilities include the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent auditors (which itself also requires shareholder ratification under Israeli law). The committee’s U.S. and Nasdaq mandated responsibilities also include assisting the board in monitoring our financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal controls. We have adopted a formal audit committee charter that we have implemented, embodying these responsibilities.
Our audit committee consists of our two external directors, Mr. Tomer Jacob and Ms. Relly Danon, as well as Mr. Itay Meroz. Each of Mr. Jacob, Ms. Danon and Mr. Meroz qualifies as an independent director under both the Nasdaq listing rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The board has furthermore determined that Mr. Jacob is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC regulations. See “Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert.”
Compensation Committee and Compensation Policy
Under the Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must appoint a compensation committee. The compensation committee must be comprised of at least three directors, including all of the external directors, who must constitute a majority of the members of the compensation committee. Each compensation committee member who is not an external director must be a director whose compensation does not exceed an amount that may be paid to an external director. The compensation committee is subject to the same Companies Law restrictions as the audit committee as to who may not be a member of the compensation committee. As noted above (under “External Directors Under the Companies Law”), Israeli companies whose securities are traded on stock exchanges such as the Nasdaq Global Select Market, and who do not have a controlling shareholder, do not have to meet the compensation committee composition requirements under the Companies Law. Reliance on this leniency is conditioned upon the compensation committee meeting the composition requirements of the jurisdiction where the company’s securities are traded. This leniency does not apply to our company, as we have a controlling shareholder (Asseco).
The duties of the compensation committee include the recommendation to the company’s board of directors of a policy regarding the terms of engagement of office holders, to which we refer as a compensation policy. That policy must be adopted by the company’s board of directors, after considering the recommendations of the compensation committee, and will need to be brought for approval by the company’s shareholders, which approval requires what we refer to as a Special Majority Approval for Compensation. A Special Majority Approval for Compensation requires shareholder approval by a majority vote of the shares present and voting at a meeting of shareholders called for such purpose, provided that either:
| ● | such majority includes at least a majority of the shares held by all shareholders who are not controlling shareholders and do not have a conflict of interest (referred to under the Companies Law as a “personal interest”) in such compensation arrangement; or; |
| ● | the total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the compensation arrangement and who vote against the arrangement does not exceed 2% of the company’s aggregate voting rights. |
165
We initially adopted a compensation policy during 2013. In 2016, our compensation committee and board approved a renewed version of our compensation policy, but the renewed policy was not approved by our shareholders at our annual general meeting of shareholders that was held on December 21, 2016. In April 2018, in accordance with Section 276A(c) of the Companies Law, our compensation committee and the board determined that the approval of the renewed compensation policy is in the best interest of our company and exercised their right to adopt the renewed compensation policy notwithstanding it not having been approved by the shareholders at the December 2016 annual general meeting. In December 2022, our compensation committee and board of directors once again approved a renewed version of our compensation policy and submitted it to our shareholders for approval at our January 12, 2023 special general shareholders meeting. Our shareholders did not approve the compensation policy at that meeting. On January 15, and 16, 2023, our compensation committee and board of directors, respectively, acting in accordance with the Companies Law, re-approved the compensation policy notwithstanding that our shareholders had not approved it. Our compensation committee and board of directors have once again approved a renewed version of our compensation policy in April 2025 and that renewed version will be presented to our annual general meeting of shareholders to be held in May 2025.
The compensation policy serves as the basis for decisions concerning the financial terms of employment or engagement of office holders, including exculpation, insurance, indemnification or any monetary payment or obligation of payment in respect of employment or engagement. The compensation policy must relate to certain factors, including advancement of the company’s objectives, the company’s business plan and its long-term strategy, and creation of appropriate incentives for office holders. It must also consider, among other things, the company’s risk management, size and the nature of its operations. The compensation policy must furthermore consider the following additional factors:
| ● | the knowledge, skills, expertise and accomplishments of the relevant office holder; |
| ● | the office holder’s roles and responsibilities and prior compensation agreements with him or her; |
| ● | the relationship between the terms offered and the average compensation of the other employees of the company, including those employed through manpower companies; |
| ● | the impact of disparities in salary upon work relationships in the company; |
| ● | the possibility of reducing variable compensation at the discretion of the board of directors; |
| ● | the possibility of setting a limit on the exercise value of non-cash variable share-based compensation; and |
| ● | as to severance compensation, the period of service of the office holder, the terms of his or her compensation during such service period, the company’s performance during that period of service, the person’s contribution towards the company’s achievement of its goals and the maximization of its profits, and the circumstances under which the person is leaving the company. |
The compensation policy must also include the following principles:
| ● | the link between variable compensation and long-term performance and measurable criteria; |
| ● | the relationship between variable and fixed compensation, and the ceiling for the value of variable compensation; |
166
| ● | the conditions under which an office holder would be required to repay compensation paid to him or her if it was later shown that the data upon which such compensation was based was inaccurate and was required to be restated in the company’s financial statements; |
| ● | the minimum holding or vesting period for variable, share-based compensation; and |
| ● | maximum limits for severance compensation. |
The compensation committee is responsible for (a) recommending the compensation policy to a company’s board of directors for its approval (and subsequent approval by its shareholders) and (b) duties related to the compensation policy and to the compensation of a company’s office holders as well as functions previously fulfilled by a company’s audit committee with respect to matters related to approval of the terms of engagement of office holders, including:
| ● | recommending whether a compensation policy should continue in effect, if the then-current policy has a term of greater than three (3) years (approval of either a new compensation policy or the continuation of an existing compensation policy must in any case occur every three years, or for a new public company, five years initially); |
| ● | recommending to the board of directors periodic updates to the compensation policy; |
| ● | assessing implementation of the compensation policy; and |
| ● | determining whether the compensation terms of the chief executive officer of the company need not be brought to approval of the shareholders. |
Our board of directors has adopted a compensation committee charter setting forth the responsibilities of the compensation committee, which include:
| ● | the responsibilities set forth in the compensation policy; |
| ● | reviewing and approving the granting of options and other incentive awards to the extent such authority is delegated by our board of directors; and |
| ● | reviewing, evaluating and making recommendations regarding the compensation and benefits for our non-employee directors. |
Our compensation committee consists of our two external directors, Mr. Tomer Jacob and Ms. Relly Danon, as well as Mr. Itay Meroz. Each of the members of our compensation committee qualifies as an independent director under the Nasdaq listing rules.
Internal Auditor
Under the Companies Law, the board of directors is required to appoint an internal auditor, nominated by the audit committee. The role of the internal auditor is to examine, among other matters, whether the company’s actions comply with the law and orderly business procedure. Under the Companies Law, the internal auditor may be an employee of the company but not an office holder, or an interested party (i.e., a holder of 5% or more of the voting rights in the company or of the issued share capital, the chief executive officer of the company or any of its directors, or a person who has the authority to appoint the company’s chief executive officer or any of its directors), or a relative of an office holder or of an interested party. In addition, the company’s independent auditor or its representative may not serve as the company’s internal auditor. Our internal auditor is Mr. Eyal Weitzman.
167
Nasdaq Exemptions for a Foreign Private Issuer
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of Nasdaq listing rule 5005(a)(18), since we are incorporated in Israel and we meet the other criteria set forth for a “foreign private issuer” under Rule 3b-4(c) under the Exchange Act. Therefore, pursuant to Nasdaq listing rule 5615(a)(3), we may follow home country practice in lieu of certain provisions of the Nasdaq listing rule 5600 series and certain other Nasdaq listing rules. Please see “Item 16G. Corporate Governance” below for a description of the manner in which we rely upon home country practice in lieu of complying with certain Nasdaq listing rules.
Exculpation, Insurance and Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Our office holders consist of the individuals listed in the table under “Directors and Senior Management,” which is displayed under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.” Under the Companies Law, an Israeli company may not exempt an office holder from liability with respect to a breach of his or her duty of loyalty, but may exempt in advance an office holder from his or her liability to the company, in whole or in part, with respect to a breach of his duty of care, provided, however, that such a breach is not related to a distribution of a dividend or any other distribution by the company.
Office Holders’ Insurance. Our articles provide that, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, we may enter into a contract for the insurance of the liability of any of our office holders imposed on the office holder in respect of an act performed in his or her capacity as an office holder, with respect to:
| ● | a breach of his duty of care to us or to another person; |
| ● | a breach of his duty of loyalty to us, provided that the office holder acted in good faith and had reasonable cause to assume that his act would not prejudice our interests; or |
| ● | a financial liability imposed upon him in favor of another person. |
We have obtained an insurance policy covering the Formula Group’s directors’ and officers’ liability. Certain of our subsidiaries (Magic Software and its subsidiaries, Sapiens and its subsidiaries, Insync, Zap Group and its subsidiaries, Ofek Aerial Photography, Shamrad, Hashahar Telecom and Michpal and its subsidiaries) participate in the premium payments of the insurance, on a proportional basis. The total premium we paid during 2024 was approximately $1.4 million for the entire Group. On a stand-alone basis, the portion allocated to Formula and its privately-held subsidiaries amounted in 2024 to $0.2 million. For 2025, the total premium we paid as a Group amounted to $1.2 million. On a stand-alone basis, the portion allocated to Formula and its privately-held subsidiaries with respect to 2025 amounted to $0.14 million .
Indemnification of Office Holders. Our articles provide that we may indemnify an office holder in respect of an obligation or expense imposed on or expended by an office holder in respect of an act performed in his capacity as an office holder as specified below:
| (i) | a financial obligation imposed on him in favor of another person by any judgment, including a settlement or an arbitrator’s award approved by a court; |
| (ii) | reasonable litigation expenses, including attorney’s fees, expended by the office holder as a result of an investigation or proceeding instituted against him by a competent authority, provided that such investigation or proceeding concluded without the filing of an indictment against him, and either (i) concluded without the imposition of any financial liability in lieu of criminal proceedings; or (ii) concluded with the imposition of a financial liability in lieu of criminal proceedings but relates to a criminal offense that does not require proof of criminal intent; |
| (iii) | reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, expended by the office holder or charged to him by a court, in proceedings instituted against him by another person, or in a criminal charge from which he was acquitted or in any criminal proceedings of a crime which does not require proof of criminal intent; |
168
| (iv) | expenses, including reasonable litigation expenses and legal fees, incurred by an office holder as a result of a proceeding instituted against such office holder in relation to (1) infringements that may impose financial sanction pursuant to the provisions of Chapter H’3 under the Israeli Securities Law, which we refer to as the Securities Law, or (2) administrative infringements pursuant to the provisions of Chapter H’4 under the Securities Law or (3) infringements pursuant to the provisions of Chapter I’1 under the Securities Law; and |
| (v) | payments made by the office holder to an injured party for damages suffered under Section 52(54)(a)(1)(a) of the Securities Law. |
We may undertake to indemnify an office holder as aforesaid, (a) prospectively, provided that in respect of (i) above, the undertaking is limited to categories of events that in the opinion of our board of directors are foreseeable in light of our actual operations at the time that the undertaking to indemnify is given, and to the amounts or criteria that our board of directors deems reasonable under the circumstances, and further provided that such events and amount or criteria are set forth in the undertaking to indemnify, but in any event no more than 25% of Formula’s shareholders equity according to its most recent financial statements as of the date of the actual payment of indemnification; and (b) retroactively.
Limitations on Exemption, Insurance and Indemnification. The Companies Law provides that a company may not indemnify an office holder, enter into an insurance contract which would provide coverage for any monetary liability, or exempt an office holder from liability, with respect to any of the following:
| ● | a breach by the office holder of his duty of loyalty unless the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company; |
| ● | a breach by the office holder of his duty of care if the breach was done intentionally or recklessly, except for a breach that was made in negligence; |
| ● | any act or omission done with the intent to derive an illegal personal benefit; |
| ● | any fine levied against the office holder; or |
| ● | a counterclaim made by the company or in its name in connection with a claim against the company filed by the office holder. |
In addition, under the Companies Law, indemnification of, and procurement of insurance coverage for, our office holders must be approved by our audit committee and our board of directors and, in specified circumstances, by our shareholders.
We have entered into undertakings to indemnify our office holders in specified limited categories of events and in specified amounts, subject to the limitations set by the Companies Law and our articles, as described above. For more information, see “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions – Indemnification of Office Holders.”
Directors’ Severance Benefits Upon Termination of Employment
We have not entered into any service contracts with any members of our board of directors that provide for specific benefits upon termination of employment, as none of our directors is employed by us or otherwise subject to a consulting or similar contract with us that provides benefits upon termination of employment or service. The only severance pay benefits that we provide are provided to employees as required under Israeli law and are described below in the section titled “Employees”.
169
| D. | Employees |
The table below sets forth the average number of employees employed by us, as allocated among our eight subsidiaries in which we have effective control through December 31, 2023, during each of the last three fiscal years:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | ||||||||||
| Matrix | 11,200 | 11,200 | 11,570 | |||||||||
| Magic Software | 4,161 | 3,628 | 3,787 | |||||||||
| Sapiens | 4,754 | 5,000 | 4,850 | |||||||||
| TSG Systems | 442 | 500 | 784 | |||||||||
| Michpal | 273 | 302 | 321 | |||||||||
| Ofek | 90 | 87 | 120 | |||||||||
| Insync | 788 | 948 | 949 | |||||||||
| Zap Group | 311 | 198 | 277 | |||||||||
| Shamrad | - | 37 | 37 | |||||||||
| Hashhar Telecom | - | - | 25 | |||||||||
| Total | 22,059 | 21,900 | 22,720 | |||||||||
The table below sets forth the average number of employees employed by us, as allocated by geographical area of employment, during each of the last three fiscal years:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | ||||||||||
| Israel | 13,629 | 13,763 | 14,705 | |||||||||
| United States and Canada | 3,198 | 3,498 | 3,502 | |||||||||
| Europe | 2,771 | 1,978 | 1,915 | |||||||||
| Asia (mainly India) | 2,453 | 2,650 | 2,438 | |||||||||
| South Africa | 8 | 11 | 160 | |||||||||
| Total | 22,059 | 21,900 | 22,720 | |||||||||
With respect to our employees in Israel, we are subject to various Israeli labor laws and labor practices, and to administrative orders extending certain provisions of collective bargaining agreements between the Histadrut (Israel’s General Federation of Labor) and the Coordinating Bureau of Economic Organizations (the Israeli federation of employers’ organizations) to all private sector employees. For example, mandatory cost of living adjustments, which compensate Israeli employees for a portion of the increase in the Israeli consumer price index, are determined, from time to time, on a nationwide basis. Israeli law also requires the payment of severance benefits upon the termination, retirement (in some instances) or death of an employee. We meet this requirement by (i) contributing on an ongoing basis towards “managers’ insurance” funds that combine pension, insurance and, if applicable, severance pay benefits and (ii) payment of differences, if applicable. In addition, Israeli employers and employees are required to pay specified percentages of wages to the National Insurance Institute. Other provisions of Israeli law or regulation govern matters such as the length of the workday, minimum wages, other terms of employment and restrictions on discrimination.
We are also subject to the labor laws and regulations of other jurisdictions in the world where we have employees.
| E. | Share Ownership |
As of April 30, 2025, none of our directors or officers owned any shares of our company (whether actual ordinary shares or shares issuable upon exercise of options), except for Mr. Guy Bernstein, our chief executive officer, Mr. Asaf Berenstin, our chief financial officer and Ms. Maya Solomon, our chief operational manager, as described under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management & Employees— B. Compensation—Service Agreement with, and Equity Grant to, Chief Executive Officer” and “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management & Employees— Restricted Share Grants to Chief Financial Officer” above. None of the ordinary shares beneficially owned by Messrs. Bernstein and Berenstin or Ms. Solomon has voting rights different from those possessed by other holders of Formula’s ordinary shares.
170
At the current time, based on information that he has provided to us, Mr. Guy Bernstein beneficially owns 11.73% of Formula’s ordinary shares, in the aggregate. Please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders” below for more information.
At the current time, based on information that he has provided to us, Mr. Asaf Berenstin owns 31,833 of Formula’s ordinary shares, consisting of 10,000 restricted shares, 833 restricted shares and 21,000 restricted shares which were granted to him on November 13, 2014, August 17, 2017 and March 14, 2022, respectively (as described above under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees— B. Compensation— Restricted Share Grants to Chief Financial Officer” and in Note 18(b) to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report). As of April 30, 2025, 23,583 restricted shares were fully vested, with the remaining 8,250 restricted shares to be vested over remaining 11 equal quarterly periods, which commenced on April 1, 2025 and will conclude on December 31, 2027. All restricted shares, whether vested or not, are held in the trust.
At the current time, based on information that she has provided to us, Ms. Maya Solomon owns 25,000 of Formula’s ordinary shares, consisting of 10,000 restricted shares and 15,000 restricted shares which were granted to her on November 19, 2018 and on January 16, 2023, respectively (as described above under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees— B. Compensation— Restricted Share Grants to Chief Operational Officer” and in Note 18(b) to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report). Of those shares, as of April 30, 2025, 14,285 restricted shares were fully vested, with the remaining 10,715 restricted shares to be vested at certain points in time over a seven-year period, which commenced on January 16, 2023, and which concludes on December 31, 2029. All restricted shares, whether vested or not, are held in the trust.
Arrangements Involving the Issuance or Grant of Equity Awards
Formula’s 2011 Share Incentive Plan
In March 2011, our board of directors adopted Formula’s 2011 Share Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 2011 Plan. Pursuant to the 2011 Plan, we may grant from time to time to our and our subsidiaries’ employees, office holders (which are not Formula’s controlling shareholders) and consultants’ options to purchase, share based awards or restricted shares with respect to, up to an aggregate of 545,000 ordinary shares of Formula. The 2011 Plan is administered by our board of directors. The 2011 Plan provides that options, restricted shares or other stock-based awards may be granted, from time to time, to such grantees to be determined by our board of directors, at such exercise prices and with such vesting or other terms as shall be determined by the board at its sole and absolute discretion. Options may no longer be granted under the 2011 Plan.
In March 2012, our board of directors increased the amount of ordinary shares reserved for issuance under the 2011 Plan by 1,200,000 shares.
Of the options available for grant under the 2011 Plan, we approved the grant, in March 2011, of options to purchase 543,840 ordinary shares to our Chief Executive Officer, each to be exercisable for no consideration and, in March 2012, we approved the grant of options to purchase 1,122,782 ordinary shares to our chief executive officer, each to be exercisable at a price of NIS 0.01 per share. Please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees— B. Compensation—Service Agreement with, and Equity Grant to, Chief Executive Officer” for a description of those grants. We have also approved the grant of 10,000 restricted shares to our chief financial officer on each of November 13, 2014 and August 17, 2017 and the grant of 10,000 restricted shares to our chief operational officer on November 19, 2017, in each case under the 2011 Plan. Please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees— B. Compensation— Restricted Share Grants to Chief Financial Officer” for a description of those grants.
Formula’s 2021 Share Incentive Plan
In August 2021, our board of directors adopted Formula’s 2021 Share Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 2021 Plan. Pursuant to the 2021 Plan, we may grant from time to time to our and our subsidiaries’ employees, office holders (which are not Formula’s controlling shareholders) and consultants’ options to purchase, share based awards or restricted shares with respect to, up to an aggregate of 350,000 ordinary shares of Formula (including 48,378 ordinary shares that were reserved for issuance under the 2011 Plan and not subject to outstanding grants and transferred to the 2021 Plan). The 2021 Plan is administered by our board of directors. The 2021 Plan provides that options, restricted shares, or other share-based awards may be granted, from time to time, to such grantees to be determined by our board of directors, at such exercise prices and with such vesting or other terms as shall be determined by the board at its sole and absolute discretion.
171
Of the shares available for grant under the 2021 Plan, we approved the grant, in March 2022, of 21,000 restricted shares to our chief financial officer and an aggregate of 2,400 restricted shares to employees of the Company, and the grant, in January 2023, of 15,000 restricted shares to our chief operational officer. Please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees— B. Compensation” for a description of those grants.
Equity Incentive Plans of Our Subsidiaries
Our subsidiaries generally have equity incentive plans pursuant to which qualified directors, employees and consultants may be granted options or other share-based awards consisting of securities of the subsidiaries.
F. Disclosure of a registrant’s action to recover erroneously awarded compensation.
Not applicable.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
| A. | Major Shareholders |
The following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership (as defined in Form 20-F promulgated by the SEC) of Formula’s ordinary shares (including shares represented by ADSs) as of March 31, 2025 by each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of Formula’s ordinary shares, and by our directors and executive officers as a group, based on information provided to us by our shareholders or disclosed in public filings with the SEC. None of the holders of the ordinary shares listed in the below table has voting rights different from other holders of Formula’s ordinary shares. Except where indicated otherwise, we believe, based on information furnished by these owners, that each of the beneficial owners of Formula’s ordinary shares listed below has sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares.
| Name | Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | Percentage of Ownership (2) | ||||||
| Asseco Poland S.A. (3) | 3,958,154 | 25.82 | % | |||||
| Guy Bernstein (4) | 1,797,973 | 11.73 | % | |||||
| Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd.(5) | 1,184,127 | 7.72 | % | |||||
| Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd.(6) | 1,088,725 | 7.10 | % | |||||
| Phoenix Holdings Ltd. (7) | 1,068,327 | 6.97 | % | |||||
| Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd. (8) | 1,028,539 | 6.71 | % | |||||
| Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd. and affiliates (9) | 824,703 | 5.38 | % | |||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons) (10) | 1,836,591 | 11.98 | % | |||||
| (1) | Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Ordinary shares underlying options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table are deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of the person holding such options but are not deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of any other person. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. |
| (2) | The percentages shown are based on 15,332,667 ordinary shares (including 122,546 shares represented by ADSs, and shares subject to restrictions and repurchase by us) issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025. |
| (3) | Based on Amendment No. 5 to Schedule 13D filed by Asseco Poland S.A., or Asseco, with the SEC on December 7, 2022. Due to the public ownership of its shares, Asseco is not controlled by any other corporation or any one individual or group of shareholders. |
172
| (4) | Based on Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13D filed by Mr. Bernstein with the SEC on December 7, 2022. Consists of (a) (i) 1,362,822 ordinary shares held in trust for Mr. Bernstein, and (b) an additional 435,151 ordinary shares held by Mr. Bernstein. |
| (5) | Based on written notification received from Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd., or Harel Insurance, on April 2, 2025. Harel Insurance is a publicly held Israeli corporation. Out of the 1,184,127 ordinary shares beneficially owned by Harel Insurance: (i) 1,128,493 are held for members of the public through, among others, provident funds and/or mutual funds and/or pension funds and/or insurance policies and/or exchange traded funds, which are managed by subsidiaries of Harel Insurance, each of which subsidiaries operates under independent management and makes independent voting and investment decisions;, and (ii) 55,634 ordinary shares are beneficially held for Harel Insurance’s own account. |
| (6) | Based on written notification received from Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd., or Menora Holdings, on April 7, 2025. Out of the 1,088,725 ordinary shares beneficially owned by Menora Holdings (i) 1,079,528 ordinary shares are beneficially owned by Menora Holdings and by entities that are direct or indirect, wholly owned or majority-owned, subsidiaries of Menora Holdings. The economic interest or beneficial ownership in a portion of the foregoing ordinary shares (including the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, such shares) is held for the benefit of insurance policy holders, the owners of portfolio accounts, or the members of the mutual funds, provident funds, or pension funds, as the case may be;, and (ii) 9,197 ordinary shares are beneficially held for Menora Holdings’ own account. |
| (7) | Based on written notification received from Phoenix Holdings Ltd. on April 2, 2025. The ordinary shares held by Phoenix Holdings are beneficially owned by various direct or indirect, majority or wholly-owned subsidiaries of Phoenix Holdings, or the Phoenix Subsidiaries. The Phoenix Subsidiaries manage their own funds and/or the funds of others, including for holders of exchange-traded notes or various insurance policies, members of pension or provident funds, unit holders of mutual funds, and portfolio management clients. Each of the Phoenix Subsidiaries operates under independent management and makes its own independent voting and investment decisions. As of March 31, 2025, the securities reported herein were held as follows: (i) the Phoenix Investments House - trust funds: 315,496; (ii) The Phoenix pension and provident funds: 4,853; and (iii) Partnership for Israeli shares: 747,978. (All ownership rights in these partnerships belong to companies that are part of Phoenix Group. The amount of ownership rights held by such companies in the partnership changes frequently according to a mechanism provided in the partnership agreement). |
| (8) | Based on written notification received from Yelin Lapidot on April 7, 2025. Out of the 1,028,539 ordinary shares beneficially owned by Yelin: (i) 827,732 are beneficially owned by provident funds managed by Yelin Lapidot Provident Funds Management Ltd., or Yelin Provident, and (ii) 200,807 are beneficially owned by mutual funds managed by Yelin Lapidot Mutual Funds Management Ltd., or Yelin Mutual. Each of Yelin Provident and Yelin Mutual is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Yelin. Messrs. Dov Yelin and Yair Lapidot each own 24.38% of the share capital and 25.004% of the voting rights of Yelin Lapidot, and are responsible for the day-to-day management of Yelin Lapidot Holdings. The ordinary shares beneficially owned are held for the benefit of the members of the provident funds and the mutual funds. Each of Yelin, Yelin Provident, Yelin Mutual and Messrs. Yelin and Lapidot disclaims beneficial ownership of the subject ordinary shares. |
| (9) | Based on written notification received from Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd., or Clal, on April 1, 2025. Clal is a publicly held Israeli corporation. All the 824,703 ordinary shares beneficially owned by Clal are held for members of the public through, among others, provident funds and/or mutual funds and/or pension funds and/or insurance policies and/or exchange traded funds, which are managed by subsidiaries of Clal, each of which subsidiaries operates under independent management and makes independent voting and investment decisions |
| (10) | Includes the shares beneficially owned by Mr. Guy Bernstein described in note (4) above, as well as 24,333 vested restricted shares granted to Mr. Asaf Berenstin, the Company’s chief financial officer, on November 13, 2014 and on August 17, 2017 under the Company’s 2011 Plan. Besides Mr. Bernstein, Mr. Berenstin, and Ms. Maya Solomon-Ella, the Company’s chief operations officer (who was granted 25,000 restricted shares in November 2018 and in January 2023, of which 14,285 are vested), none of our other directors or executive officers beneficially owns any ordinary shares (whether actual ordinary shares or shares issuable upon exercise of options). |
173
Recent Significant Changes in Holdings of Major Shareholders
On December 5, 2022, Asseco and Mr. Guy Bernstein terminated a voting agreement that had been in effect between them and which had granted Asseco certain voting rights with respect to the 1,797,973 ordinary shares owned by Mr. Bernstein. That termination reduced Asseco’s beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares from 37.3% to 25.6%.
On March 30, 2023, Asseco acquired an additional 42,553 of our ordinary shares, representing 0.28% of our outstanding share capital as of March 31, 2023, in the open market.
Record Shareholders
As of April 30, 2025, we had one shareholder of record, which was not a United States record holder. The number of record holders is not representative of the number of beneficial holders of our ordinary shares, as the shares of all shareholders (including shares represented by ADSs) are recorded in the name of our Israeli share registrar, Mizrachi Tefahot Registration Company Limited. All of our ordinary shares (including shares represented by ADSs) have equal voting rights. However, under applicable Israeli law, the shares that we have repurchased and currently hold have no voting rights and, therefore, are excluded from the number of our outstanding shares.
Record ADS Holders
As of May 1, 2025, 123,133 ADSs were issued and outstanding pursuant to a depositary agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, representing approximately 0.80% of our outstanding ordinary shares. As of that date, there were approximately 12 registered holders of our ADSs, of whom approximately 9 record holders were United States residents. Such number of record holders is not representative of the actual number of beneficial holders of our ADSs in the United States.
Potential Change in Control Transactions
We are unaware of any arrangements which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of Formula.
| B. | Related Party Transactions |
Indemnification of Office Holders
We have undertaken to indemnify each of our office holders. Our office holders’ indemnification letters provide, among other things, that we will indemnify each of our office holders to the maximum extent permitted by our articles. Advance payments for coverage of legal expenses in criminal proceedings will be required to be repaid by an office holder to the company if such office holder is found guilty of a crime which requires proof of criminal intent, or if it is determined that the office holder is not lawfully entitled to such indemnification.
All of the indemnification letters granted to our office holders are identical, including indemnification letters granted to office holders who are or may be considered “controlling persons” under the Companies Law.
The indemnification is limited to the expenses and matters detailed in the indemnification letters insofar as they result from an office holder’s actions in connection with, among other things, the following matters: the offering of securities by us to the public or to private investors; the offer by us to purchase securities from the public, private investors or other holders, whether pursuant to a prospectus, agreement, notice, report, tender or any other proceeding; our labor relations and/or employment matters and our trade relations; the development or testing of products developed by us, or the distribution, sale, license or use of such products; and occurrences in connection with investments made by us.
174
Our undertaking for indemnification is limited to up to 25% of our shareholders’ equity as it appears in our latest financial statements known at the date of indemnification, calculated with respect to each director and officer of Formula.
Our undertaking for indemnification does not apply to a liability incurred as a result of any of the following:
| (i) | a breach by an office holder of his or her fiduciary duty, except, to the extent permitted by law, for a breach while acting in good faith and having reasonable cause to assume that the action was in our best interest; |
| (ii) | a grossly negligent or intentional violation of the office holder’s duty of care; |
| (iii) | an intentional action in which the office holder intended to reap a personal gain illegally; |
| (iv) | a fine, civil fine or financial sanction levied against and/or imposed upon the office holder; |
| (v) | a proceeding instituted against the office holder pursuant to the provisions of Chapter H’3, H’4 or I’1 under the Securities Law, except as otherwise permitted in the undertaking; or |
| (vi) | a counterclaim brought by us or in our name in connection with a claim against us filed by the office holder, other than by way of defense or by way of third party notice in connection with a claim brought against the office holder by us, or in specific cases in which our board of directors has approved the initiation or bringing of such suit by the office holder, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. |
We are not required to indemnify an office holder if the office holder, or anyone on his or her behalf, already received payment in respect of a liability subject to indemnification, under an effective insurance coverage or an effective indemnification arrangement with a third party. However, if that payment made to the office holder does not cover the entire liability subject to the indemnification, we will indemnify the office holder in respect of the difference between the amount paid to the office holder and the liability subject to the indemnification.
Office Holders’ Insurance
We have obtained an insurance policy covering the Formula Group’s D&O liability. Our subsidiaries participate in the premium payments of the insurance policy, on a proportional basis. The current coverage of that policy is up to a maximum of $60.0 million both per incident and in the aggregate, plus $10.0 million of Side A DIC coverage, for a total annual premium of $1.2 million for the period starting on February 14, 2025 and ending on February 13, 2026. The total annual premium of $1,151,090 under that policy is allocated for payment among our subsidiaries excluding Matrix.
Service Agreement with our Chief Executive Officer
We are party to a written service agreement with our chief executive officer, Mr. Guy Bernstein, which was entered into in December 2008 and was amended in March 2011 and in March 2012. This agreement provides for early termination by either side upon 180 days advance written notice, during which time the Chief Executive Officer will continue to receive service fees. This agreement furthermore contains customary provisions regarding nondisclosure, confidentiality of information and assignment of inventions. Please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management & Employees— B. Compensation—Service Agreement with, and Equity Grant to, Chief Executive Officer” for more details concerning that service agreement.
175
Services Obtained from Asseco
During 2024, Asseco provided back-office services, professional services and fixed assets to Sapiens’ wholly-owned subsidiary, Sapiens Poland, in an amount totaling approximately $0.2 million.
Services Provided to Asseco
During 2024, Sapiens Poland performed services as a sub-contractor on behalf of Asseco for clients of Asseco in a total amount of approximately $3.9 million. For historical reasons, Asseco issues invoices to those clients and then Sapiens in turn invoices Asseco on a back-to-back basis (with no margin to Asseco).
Fees Paid for Board Services in Affiliates
Sapiens paid us approximately $31,562 in respect of its share of Formula’s director fees for Guy Bernstein, who also serves as Sapiens’ Chairman of the Board, for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Matrix paid us approximately $29,200 in respect of its share of Formula’s director fees for Guy Bernstein, who also serves as Matrix’s Chairman of the Board, for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Proposed Merger Between Subsidiaries
As previously reported by each of Magic Software and Matrix, on March 11, 2025, Magic Software and Matrix entered into a non-binding memorandum of understanding (the “MOU”) related to a potential merger between them (the “Merger”). Under the MOU, Magic Software and Matrix agreed to negotiate a definitive agreement (the “Definitive Agreement”) regarding the Merger, pursuant to which Matrix will acquire the entire share capital of Magic Software on a fully diluted basis, by way of a reverse triangular merger, upon completion of which Magic Software will become a private company, wholly owned by Matrix. The consideration to be paid to Magic Software’s shareholders will be in the form of Matrix’s ordinary shares, based on an exchange ratio to be derived from the valuations of the companies, as detailed below.
Upon completion of the Merger, ordinary shares of Matrix would continue to be traded exclusively on the TASE, while Magic Software's ordinary shares would be expected to be delisted from trading on the TASE and Nasdaq.
Based on the relative valuations of both companies and an exchange ratio derived from 31.125%/68.875% (Magic Software and Matrix, respectively), Magic Software's shareholders would receive merger consideration in Matrix shares such that immediately following the Merger, they hold 31.125% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Matrix (the “Consideration Shares“ or the “Merger Consideration“), while the shareholders who held Matrix's shares prior to the Merger would hold 68.875%, in each case on a fully diluted basis. The companies may distribute dividends in accordance with the provisions of their respective distribution policies as in effect on the date of the MOU (and in any event, up to 75% of their respective net profits attributable to shareholders), for the year 2024 and for the first and second quarters of 2025, without it affecting the agreed relative valuation ratio of 31.125%/68.875%. The Merger is expected to be accounted for in Matrix's financial statements using the pooling of interest method, whereby the combined company’s assets and liabilities will be recorded at their book value. Accordingly, no original goodwill will be recognized upon acquisition, and consequently, no subsequent amortization of original goodwill will be recorded.
The Definitive Agreement will be based on the above terms as well as other customary terms and conditions. The execution of the Definitive Agreement is subject to the following conditions, among others: (1) satisfactory completion of a due diligence investigation by each of the companies in respect of the other; (2) each company’s independent committee of directors obtaining a separate fairness opinion by an independent financial advisor, confirming that the Merger Consideration is fair to the shareholders of that company; (3) the approval of the independent committee, the audit committee and board of directors of each of the companies to the contemplated Merger.
176
The consummation of the Merger will be subject to conditions to be set forth in the Definitive Agreement, including: (1) obtaining each of the companies’ shareholders’ approval to the Merger, by a special majority of the minority shareholders as required under Israeli law; (2) obtaining all regulatory approvals required for the consummation of the Merger; (3) obtaining third party approvals to the Merger, as will be specified in the Definitive Agreement; (4) obtaining a pre-ruling from the Israeli Tax Authority in connection with the Merger and to postpone the tax liability of shareholders; and (5) completing the reporting and disclosure documents required to be published by the companies under applicable law for consummating the Merger and issuing the Consideration Shares.
Trade Payables
As of December 31, 2024, we had trade payables balances due to, and trade receivables balances due from, our related parties in amounts of approximately $3.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
Other Transactions
From time to time, in our ordinary course of business, we engage in non-material transactions with our subsidiaries and affiliates where the amount involved in, and the nature of, the transactions are not material to any party to the transaction. We believe that these transactions are made on an arms’ length basis upon terms and conditions no less favorable to us, our subsidiaries and affiliates, as we could obtain from unaffiliated third parties. If we engage with our subsidiaries and affiliates in transactions which are not in the ordinary course of business, we receive the approvals required under the Companies Law. These approvals include audit committee approval, board approval and, in certain circumstances, shareholder approval. See “Item 6.C. Board Practices.”
| C. | Interests of Experts and Counsel |
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| A. | Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information |
Financial Statements
Our consolidated financial statements and other financial information are incorporated herein by reference to “Item 18. Financial Statements” below.
Export Sales
In 2024, 36.7% of our revenues originated from customers located outside of Israel. For information on our revenues breakdown by geographic market for the past three years, see “Item 4— Information on the Company— Business Overview— Geographical Distribution of Revenues.”
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are subject to legal, administrative and regulatory proceedings, claims, demands and investigations in the ordinary course of business, including claims with respect to intellectual property, contracts, employment and other matters. In Accordance with IFRS, we accrue a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in the determination of both the probability and as to whether a loss is reasonably estimable. These accruals are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter. We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against the above claims, and we generally intend to vigorously defend any other legal claims to which we are subject. While for most litigation, the outcome is difficult to determine, to the extent that there is a reasonable possibility that the losses to which we may be subject could exceed the amounts (if any) that it has already accrued, we attempt to estimate such additional loss, if reasonably possible, and disclose it (or, if it is an immaterial amount, indicate accordingly). The aggregate provision that we have recorded for all other legal proceedings (other than the particular material proceedings described below) is not material. Furthermore, in respect of our ordinary course legal, administrative and regulatory proceedings (i.e., other than the particular material proceeding described below), we estimate, in accordance with the procedures described above, that as of the current time there is no reasonable possibility that we will incur material losses exceeding the non-material amounts already recognized.
177
Legal Proceedings Related to Formula’s CEO’s RSU Grant
On November 23, 2020, Olir Trade and Industries Ltd. (“Olir”) filed a derivative action and a motion to certify a derivative action, with the District Court (Economic Division) of Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel (Derivative Action No. 58348-11-20) (the “Claim” and the “Motion to Certify”, respectively) (as reported in our Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K furnished to the SEC on December 9, 2020). In the framework of the Motion to Certify, Olir requested permission to file the Claim, on our behalf, against each of our five directors, as well as our chief executive officer, Mr. Guy Bernstein, and chief financial officer, Mr. Asaf Berenstin, as defendants. We and the named defendants are all listed as respondents to the Motion to Certify. The Claim challenges the legality, under the Companies Law, of compensation awarded to the our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, including past engagements with our chief executive officer and the re-approval by our compensation committee and board of directors in November 2020 (as reported in our Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K furnished to the SEC on November 4, 2020), of the eight-year equity-based award of compensation—in the form of 611,771 restricted share units— to our chief executive officer. The Claim includes allegations of breaches of fiduciary duties (duty of care and duty of loyalty) and the oppression of minority shareholders and unjust enrichment. The Claim seeks an accounting from the defendants as to the alleged harm caused to Formula Systems, as well as compensation to Formula Systems for such harm. The Claim also seeks a declaratory order preventing the board of directors from using voting powers allegedly granted to it under agreements related to our ADSs. We reject all claims made by Olir and believe that all actions taken by our board of directors and our committees were taken in accordance with the Companies Law, for Formula’s benefit, and based upon advice of legal counsel. All respondents intend to vigorously defend against the Motion to Certify, and on May 13, 2021, all respondents filed their responses to the Motion to Certify.
On January 24, 2023, we submitted a request for dismissal in limine of the motion to certify due to a change in the factual grounds of the motion including, among other things, the reapproval of the compensation given to our chief executive officer by a new and independent board of directors made on January 15, 2023. The court asked the other parties to respond to the request for dismissal by March 1,2023. A cross examinations hearing was held on January 31, 2023. On March 1, 2023, the other respondents to the motion to certify submitted their responses to the request for dismissal in which they supported the request. On March 8, 2023, Olir filed its objection to the dismissal in limine. On April 13, 2023, we submitted our response to Olir’s response. Olir filed its briefs by September 18, 2023. On December 3, 2023, we filed a motion to render a decision in the motion to dismiss in limine. On December 5, 2023, the court granted our motion to dismiss in limine, and ordered us to pay Olir’s costs in an amount of NIS 45,000. On January 25, 2024, Olir filed an appeal against the District Court’s decision with the Israeli Supreme Court. Olir failed to attach to its appeal the pleadings regarding the motion to dismiss. On March 26, 2024, all respondents notified the Supreme Court that they believe that Olir acted in bad faith and contrary to the rule of law when it did not attach essential documents to the notice of appeal and drafted a misleading notice of appeal. The respondents argued that those actions had real implications on the pre-appeal hearing, as the court lacked the respondents’ position and claims. Therefore, the respondents requested that their position be heard at a bench hearing of the court. A bench hearing is now scheduled for March 6, 2026. The respondents are required to file their response to Olir’s appeal by June 3, 2025. At this stage of the proceedings, we believe that the chances for the approval of Olir’s Motion to Certify are low.
178
Legal Proceedings related to Matrix
On December 3, 2023, our subsidiary Matrix received a request for disclosure of materials pursuant to Section 198a of the Companies Law, which was submitted to the District Court (Economic Division) of Tel Aviv-Jaffa by an individual who claimed to be a shareholder of Matrix. The request related to a potential derivative claim that could be filed by the individual, on Matrix’s behalf, against Matrix’s chief executive officer and each of its directors related to the procedure for the approval of compensation awarded to Matrix’s chief executive officer following the rejection of such compensation by Matrix’s general meeting of shareholders and the re-approval of that compensation by Matrix’s compensation committee and board of directors, respectively, acting in accordance with the Companies Law. On April 18, 2024, Matrix filed a response to the disclosure request in which Matrix requested that the court deny, on various grounds, the request made by the potential plaintiff. An inquest was held on the disclosure motion on February 2, 2025. At this stage of this legal proceeding we cannot predict its outcome.
Legal Proceedings related to Zap Group
On December 24, 2019, a motion for the approval of a class action (#60508-02-20), in an amount of NIS 793.8 million (approximately $217.7 million), was filed against Zap Group with the Israeli district court (central district), claiming that Zap Group had allegedly generated income illegally from paying customers through the ‘ZAP’s price comparison’ website. At the pre-trial hearing, it was decided that the plaintiffs would file an explanation to the court as to why they believed they were fit to serve as class action plaintiffs and why they had performed prohibited clicks on their competitor’s websites through Zap Group’s website. In addition, the plaintiffs were requested to update whether they were willing to reduce the amount of the claim. On July 15, 2021, the plaintiffs filed a motion to reduce the amount of the claim to NIS 63 million (approximately $17.3 million). On December 15, 2021, a pre-trial hearing took place, in which the court clarified that it does not intend to interfere with Zap Group’s business considerations regarding the click filtering mechanisms that it operates. The court recommended that the plaintiffs reach an agreed solution with Zap Group on the issue of the necessary disclosure that Zap Group should include in its contracts with customers (as available on its website). The parties were requested to file a joint notice in accordance with the court’s recommendation by January 15, 2022. The plaintiffs submitted a request for an extension to file the notice. On April 5, 2022, the plaintiffs filed a notice with the court stating that they had not reached agreements with Zap Group and therefore seek to set the case for evidentiary hearing. On December 12, 2022 the parties filed a joint notice with the court stating their agreement to initiate a mediation process. A mediation meeting took place on February 6, 2023. The mediation ended without the parties reaching an agreement. As a result, evidentiary hearings were held between March 6, 2024, and July 10, 2024, during which expert and fact witnesses from both sides were examined. Subsequently, deadlines were set for the submission of the parties’ summations. On August 8, 2024, the parties informed the court that they had reached an agreement to refer the matter to a mediation process to be presided upon by another judge of the same court. Accordingly, mediation sessions took place on December 11, 2024 and January 21, 2025 in front of Judge Rami Haymovitz. On March 3, 2025, the plaintiffs’ counsel informed the court that there had been disagreements between the defendants and their counsel over the course of the mediation, and requested that the court determine as to whether they could continue to represent the plaintiffs in the case. On March 24, 2025, as a result of a hearing, the court requested that the plaintiffs’ counsel and Zap Group propose terms for a settlement of the litigation on or before June 4, 2025 that the plaintiffs could review and determine whether to accept. As this claim was filed against Zap Group prior to its acquisition by Formula, any potential liability of Zap Group resulting from the proceedings is covered by the indemnification obligations of the former shareholders of Zap Group to Formula.
On December 30, 2021, Ronen Har Even, Galit Har Even and TV Center Ltd. (the “Plaintiffs”) submitted a monetary claim in the sum of NIS 24.5 million (approximately $7.0 million) and a claim for the grant of a mandamus order against Zap Group, in the District Court at Haifa. The Plaintiffs allege that Zap Group constitutes a monopoly in the provision of price comparison services in the online arena in Israel, and excluded the Plaintiffs’ business from the E-commerce arena in Israel. According to the Plaintiffs, Zap Group prevented price comparisons between the prices of the Plaintiffs’ televisions and the prices of the televisions of the official importers, by causing systemic manipulations aimed at excluding the television models sold by the Plaintiffs and blurring the fact that they are cheaper in the search results. As mentioned in the Statement of Claim, concurrent with submission of the claim, on April 19, 2021, the Plaintiffs submitted a complaint against Zap Group to the Israel Competition Authority, and on August 18, 2021 and October 21, 2021, submitted supplements to the aforesaid complaint. On June 1, 2022, Zap Group submitted a statement of defense, denying the Plaintiffs’ allegations and in particular the Plaintiffs’ argument that Zap Group has a monopoly in the provision of price comparison services in the online arena in Israel. Following discovery and pre-trial hearings, the Plaintiffs and ZAP Group submitted affidavits of primary testimony in June 2024 and July 2024, respectively. On January 28, 2025, evidentiary hearings began. The court ordered the plaintiffs to complete witness testimony by March 1, 2025, and scheduled further hearings through October 2025. The evidentiary hearings are currently ongoing. At the current stage of proceedings, it is not possible to estimate the outcome of the claim.
179
In November 2023, N.Z. Marketing and Advertising Ltd (“Safra”), a subsidiary of Zap Group, was added as defendant to a lawsuit filed by the estate of the deceased Klil Kimchi, who died in an accident in a swimming pool in a private house during a social event organized by Safra and another company. The deceased was invited as a guest of the other company. The total claim is for an amount of NIS 9.645 million. The other company has filed a third-party notice against Safra. As of May 7, 2024, Safra submitted a statement of defense as well as a third-party notice on its behalf, and no statements of defense have yet been submitted to the third-party notice submitted by the company. On November 14, 2024, a preliminary hearing was held in court, during which the judge suggested that the parties settle the case by paying compensation to the plaintiff. The defendants have not yet accepted the plaintiff’s position. At the current stage of proceedings, it is not possible to estimate the outcome of the claim. The subject incident (in which the deceased died) took place before Zap Group acquired Safra; therefore, any potential liability of Zap Group resulting from the proceedings is covered by the indemnification obligations of the former shareholders of Safra to Zap Group.
Dividend Policy
Under Israeli law, dividends may be paid by an Israeli company only out of profits and other surplus as calculated under Israeli law, as of the end date of the most recent financial statements or as accrued over a period of two years, whichever amount is greater, and provided that there is no reasonable concern that payment of a dividend will prevent the company from satisfying its existing and foreseeable obligations as they become due. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Memorandum and Articles of Association—Dividend and Liquidation Rights” below (the content of which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to this annual report) for more information.
Formula
Under Formula Systems’ dividend policy adopted by our board of directors, sums that are not planned to be used for investments in the near future may be distributed to its shareholders as a cash dividend, to the extent that our performance allows such distribution. In the three most recent fiscal years (and in 2025 up to the date of this annual report), Formula has made the following distributions:
In March 2025 Formula declared a dividend to its shareholders in an amount of NIS 3.45 per share (approximately $0.94 per share) to be paid on May 14, 2025. The aggregate amount distributed by Formula was approximately NIS 52.9 million (approximately $14.4 million).
In August 2024, Formula declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an amount of NIS 2.32 per share (approximately $0.63 per share), which was paid on September 26, 2024. The aggregate amount distributed by Formula was approximately NIS 35.6 million (approximately $9.6 million).
In March 2024, Formula declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of NIS 2.30 per share (approximately $0.63 per share), which was paid on April 18, 2024. The aggregate amount distributed by Formula was NIS 35.3 million (approximately $10.0 million).
In November 2022, Formula declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of NIS 2.16 per share (approximately $0.62 per share), which was paid on December 20, 2022. The aggregate amount of the dividend was approximately NIS 33.1 million (approximately $9.6 million).
180
In March 2022, Formula declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of NIS 2.56 per share (approximately $0.78 per share), which was paid in April 2022. The aggregate amount distributed by Formula was approximately NIS 39.2 million (approximately $12.0 million).
Magic Software
In August 2017, Magic Software’s board of directors amended its dividend distribution policy, whereas, each year Magic Software will distribute a dividend of up to 75% of its annual net income attributable to its shareholders (previously 50%), subject to applicable law. Magic Software’s board of directors may at its discretion and at any time, change, whether as a result of a one-time decision or a change in policy, the rate of dividend distributions or decide not to distribute a dividend. The dividend is to be distributed on a semi-annual basis. Pursuant to that policy, Magic Software has distributed the following amounts in the three most recent fiscal years:
In March 2025, Magic Software declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of $0.327 per share (or approximately $16.1 million, in the aggregate), which was paid during May 2025, of which $8.6 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In November 2024, Magic Software declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of $0.236 per share (or approximately $11.6 million, in the aggregate), which was paid during January 2025, of which $6.2 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In May 2024, Magic Software declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of $0.204 per share (or approximately $10.0 million, in the aggregate), which was paid during July 2024, of which $5.3 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In August 2023, Magic Software declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of $0.327 per share (or approximately $16.1 million, in the aggregate), which was paid during September 2023, of which $8.6 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In March 2023, Magic Software declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of $0.3 per share (or approximately $14.7 million, in the aggregate), which was paid during April 2023, of which $7.9 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In August 2022, Magic Software declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of $0.29 per share (or approximately $14.2 million, in the aggregate), which was paid during September 2022, of which $7.7 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In March 2022, Magic Software declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of $0.216 per share (or approximately $10.6 million, in the aggregate), which was paid during April 2022, of which $5.8 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
Matrix
In August 2010, Matrix’s board of directors decided to change Matrix’s dividend distribution policy, whereby in every year, Matrix will distribute a dividend at a rate of 75% (instead of 50% before) of its annual net income. The dividend is to be distributed on a quarterly basis. Pursuant to that policy, Matrix has distributed the following amounts in the three most recent fiscal years:
In March 2025, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of NIS 52.2 million (approximately $13.9 million), in the aggregate, which was paid in April 2025, of which $7.2 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In November 2024, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of NIS 48.3 million (approximately $13.3 million), in the aggregate, which was paid in January 2025, of which $6.9 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
181
In August 2024, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of NIS 52.1 million (approximately $14.0 million), in the aggregate, which was paid in October 2024, of which $7.3 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In May 2024, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders of NIS 51.5 million (approximately $14.1 million), in the aggregate, of which $7.3 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In March 2024, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of NIS 80.7 million (approximately $21.7 million), which was paid in April 2024, of which $11.3 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In August 2023, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of NIS 43.8 million (approximately $11.5 million), which was paid in September 2023, of which $6.0 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In May 2023, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of NIS 45.1 million (approximately $12.4 million), which was paid in June 2023, of which $6.4 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In March 2023, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of NIS 37.5 million (approximately $10.2 million), which was paid in April 2022, of which $5.3 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In November 2022, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of NIS 34.6 million (approximately $10.2 million), which was paid in December 2022, of which $5.3 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In August 2022, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of NIS 164.2 million (approximately $50.4 million), which was paid in August 2022, of which $25.6 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In May 2022, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of NIS 44.7 million (approximately $12.9 million), which was paid in June 2022, of which $6.6 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
In March 2022, Matrix declared a cash dividend to its shareholders in an aggregate amount of NIS 40.9 million (approximately $12.7 million), which was paid in April 2022, of which $6.5 million was paid to non-controlling interests.
Sapiens
In August 2019, Sapiens’ board of directors adopted a dividend policy, and in May 2022, it updated that policy. Under that updated policy, on a semi-annual basis, after publishing (i) its annual audited consolidated financial statements in its annual report on Form 20-F, and (ii) its financial statements for the quarter and six months ended June 30, Sapiens’ board of directors will announce, and distribute, a semi-annual cash dividend in an aggregate amount (between both dividends in total) of up to 40% of its annual net profit (on a non-GAAP basis). Sapiens’ board of directors may change, whether as a result of a one-time decision or a change in policy, the rate or frequency of dividend distributions and/or decide not to distribute a dividend. The distribution of dividends will be made in compliance with Cayman Islands law, Sapiens’ articles of association, as well as its contractual obligations.
Since the adoption of this dividend policy, Sapiens has declared cash dividends, initially on an annual basis and subsequently on a semi-annual basis, most recently in amounts of $0.47 per share, $0.23 per share, $0.25 per share $0.26 per share, $0.28 per share, $0.29 per share and $0.66 per share, or $25.9 million, $12.7 million, $13.8 million, $14.4 million, $15.6 million, $16.2 million and $36.9 million (the final such dividend amount includes both semi-annual and special dividends) in the aggregate, which were paid in May 2022, August 2022, April 2023, August 2023, April 2024, August 2024 and April 2025 of which $14.5 million, $7.1 million, $7.7 million, $8.2 million, $8.8 million, $9.2 million and $20.8 million, respectively, were paid to non-controlling interests.
182
| B. | Significant Changes |
Since the date of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, other than as described in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions— B. Related party transactions— Proposed Merger Between Subsidiaries”, there have not been any significant changes for our company.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
| A. | Offer and Listing Details |
Our ordinary shares have been trading on the TASE under the symbol “FORTY” since our initial public offering in 1991.
Our ADSs are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market since October 1997 under the symbol “FORTY.” Each ADS represents one ordinary share.
For a description of the ADSs, see “Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities— D. American Depositary Shares.”
| B. | Plan of Distribution |
Not applicable.
| C. | Markets |
Since our initial public offering in 1991, our ordinary shares have been traded in Israel on the TASE under the symbol “FORT.” No U.S. trading market exists for the ordinary shares. Since October 1997, our ADSs have been traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, under the symbol “FORTY.” Each ADS represents one ordinary share and is evidenced by an American depositary receipt, or ADR. The ADRs were issued pursuant to a Depositary Agreement entered into with the Bank of New York Mellon.
| D. | Selling Shareholders |
Not applicable.
| E. | Dilution |
Not applicable.
| F. | Expenses of the Issue |
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
| A. | Share Capital |
Not applicable.
| B. | Memorandum and Articles of Association |
The information called for by this Item 10.B of Form 20-F has been provided in Exhibit 2.2 to this annual report. The content of Exhibit 2.2 is incorporated by reference herein.
183
| C. | Material Contracts |
Please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Company Commitments” for a description of the terms of the trust agreements to which we are party in connection with our Series A Secured Debentures and Series C Secured Debentures, and Sapiens’ Series B Debentures. Please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation—Option Grants to, and Service Agreement with, Chief Executive Officer” for a description of our service agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Guy Bernstein. Beyond those agreements, Formula is not party to, and has not been party to in the last two years, any material contract entered into outside of its ordinary course of business. In addition, while our subsidiaries are party and have been party in the last two years to numerous contracts with customers, resellers and distributors, such contracts are entered into in the ordinary course of business. Furthermore, we do not deem any other individual contract entered into by any of our subsidiaries outside of the ordinary course of business (such as investment or acquisition agreements) during the last two years to be material to us on a consolidated basis.
| D. | Exchange Controls |
Under current Israeli regulations, we may pay dividends or other distributions in respect of our ordinary shares either in Israeli or non-Israeli currencies. If we make these payments in Israeli currency, they will be freely converted, transferred and paid in non-Israeli currencies at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of conversion. We expect, therefore, that dividends, if any, that we pay to holders of ADSs, will be paid in dollars, net of conversion expenses, expenses of the depositary for our ADSs, the Bank of New York Mellon, and Israeli income taxes (if applicable). Because exchange rates between the NIS and the dollar fluctuate continuously, a U.S. shareholder will be subject to the risk of currency fluctuations between the date when we declare NIS-denominated dividends and the date when we pay them in NIS. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors.”
Non-residents of Israel may freely hold and trade our ADSs or ordinary shares pursuant to the general permit issued under the Israeli Currency Control Law, 1978. Neither our articles nor the laws of the State of Israel restrict in any way the ownership of our ordinary shares by non-residents, except that these restrictions may exist with respect to citizens of countries that are in a state of war with Israel.
| E. | Taxation |
The following is a short summary of the material provisions of the tax environment to which shareholders may be subject. This summary is based on the current provisions of tax law. To the extent that the discussion is based on new tax legislation that has not been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation, we cannot assure you that the views expressed in the discussion will be accepted by the appropriate tax authorities or the courts.
The summary does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to all holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs in light of each holder’s particular circumstances and specific tax treatment. For example, the summary below does not address the tax treatment of residents of Israel and traders in securities who are subject to specific tax regimes. As individual circumstances may differ, holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs should consult their own tax adviser as to the United States, Israeli or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares and ADSs. The following is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal or professional tax advice and is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations. Each individual should consult his or her own tax or legal adviser.
Israeli Taxation Considerations for Our Shareholders
Tax Consequences Regarding Disposition of Our ADSs or Ordinary Shares
Israeli law generally imposes a capital gain tax on the sale of any capital assets by residents of Israel, as defined for Israeli tax purposes, and on the sale of assets located in Israel, including shares of Israeli companies, by both residents and non-residents of Israel, unless a specific exemption is available or unless a tax treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence provides otherwise. The Tax Ordinance distinguishes between “Real Capital Gain” and “Inflationary Surplus”. The Inflationary Surplus is a portion of the total capital gain which is equivalent to the increase of the relevant asset’s purchase price which is attributable to the increase in the Israeli consumer price index or, in certain circumstances, a foreign currency exchange rate, between the date of purchase and the date of sale. The Real Capital Gain is the excess of the total capital gain over the Inflationary Surplus.
184
Capital gain
Israeli Resident Individuals
As of January 1, 2012, the tax rate applicable to Real Capital Gain derived by Israeli individuals from the sale of shares, whether or not listed on a stock exchange, is 25%, unless such shareholder claims a deduction for interest and linkage differences expenses in connection with the purchase and holding of such shares, in which case the gain will generally be taxed at a rate of 30%. However, if such shareholder is considered a Substantial Shareholder (i.e., a person who holds, directly or indirectly, alone or together with another person who collaborates with such person on a permanent basis, 10% or more of any of the company’s “means of control” (including, among other things, the right to receive profits of the company, voting rights, the right to receive the company’s liquidation proceeds and the right to appoint a director)) at the time of sale or at any time during the preceding 12-month period, such gain will be taxed at the rate of 30%. Individual shareholders dealing in securities in Israel are taxed at their marginal tax rates applicable to business income (up to 47% in 2018 and thereafter, excluding excess tax, if applicable, as described below).
Israeli Resident Corporations
Under current Israeli tax legislation, the tax rate applicable to Real Capital Gain derived by Israeli resident corporations from the sale of shares of an Israeli company is the general corporate tax rate. As described above, the corporate tax rate since 2018 has been 23%.
Non-Israeli Resident Shareholders
Israeli capital gain tax is imposed on the disposal of capital assets by a non-Israeli resident if such assets are either (i) located in Israel; (ii) shares or rights to shares in an Israeli resident company; or (iii) represent, directly or indirectly, rights to assets located in Israel, unless a tax treaty between Israel and the seller’s country of residence provides otherwise. As mentioned above, Real Capital Gain is generally subject to tax at the corporate tax rate (23% in 2018 and thereafter) if generated by a company, or at the rate of 25% if generated by an individual, or 30%, if generated by an individual who is a “substantial shareholder” (as defined under the Tax Ordinance) , at the time of sale or at any time during the preceding 12-month period (or if the shareholder claims a deduction for interest and linkage differences expenses in connection with the purchase and holding of such shares) . A “substantial shareholder” is generally a person who alone or together with such person’s relative or another person who collaborates with such person on a permanent basis, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of any of the “means of control” of the corporation. “Means of control” generally include, among others, the right to vote, receive profits, nominate a director or an executive officer, receive assets upon liquidation, or order someone who holds any of the aforesaid rights how to act, regardless of the source of such right. Individual and corporate shareholders dealing in securities in Israel are taxed at the tax rates applicable to business income (a corporate tax rate for a corporation and a marginal tax rate of up to 47% for an individual in 2018 and thereafter (excluding excess tax as discussed below)) unless contrary provisions in a relevant tax treaty apply.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, shareholders who are non-Israeli residents (individuals and corporations) generally should be exempt from Israeli capital gain tax on any gains derived from the sale, exchange or disposition of shares publicly traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange or on a recognized stock exchange outside of Israel, provided, among other things, that (i) such gains are not generated through a permanent establishment that the non-Israeli resident maintains in Israel, (ii) the shares were purchased after being listed on a recognized stock exchange. However, non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemptions if Israeli residents (a) have a controlling interest of more than 25% in such non-Israeli corporation, or (b) are the beneficiaries of or are entitled to 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such non-Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly. Such exemption is not applicable to a person whose gains from selling or otherwise disposing of the shares are deemed to be business income.
185
In addition, a sale of shares may be exempt from Israeli capital gain tax under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty. For example, under the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, or the U.S-Israel Treaty, the sale, exchange or disposition of shares of an Israeli company by a shareholder who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the U.S.-Israel Treaty) holding the shares as a capital asset is exempt from Israeli capital gain tax unless either (i) the shareholder holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of the voting rights during any part of the 12-month period preceding such sale, exchange or disposition; (ii) the shareholder, if an individual, has been present in Israel for a period or periods of 183 days or more in the aggregate during the applicable taxable year; (iii) the capital gain arising from such sale are attributable to a permanent establishment of the shareholder which is maintained in Israel; (iv) the capital gain arising from such sale, exchange or disposition is attributed to real estate located in Israel; (v) the capital gain arising from such sale, exchange or disposition is attributed to royalties; or (vi) the shareholder is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the U.S.-Israel Treaty) and is not holding the shares as a capital asset. In each case, the sale, exchange or disposition of such shares would be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable; however, under the U.S.-Israel Treaty, a U.S. resident would be permitted to claim a credit for the Israeli tax against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to the sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations in U.S. laws applicable to foreign tax credits. The U.S-Israel Treaty does not provide such credit against any U.S. state or local taxes.
In some instances where our shareholders may be liable for Israeli tax on the sale of their ordinary shares and ADSs, the payment of the consideration may be subject to the withholding of Israeli tax at source. Shareholders may be required to demonstrate that they are exempt from tax on their capital gains in order to avoid withholding at source at the time of sale. Specifically, in transactions involving a sale of all of the shares of an Israeli resident company, in the form of a merger or otherwise, the ITA may require from shareholders who are not liable for Israeli tax to sign declarations in forms specified by this authority or obtain a specific exemption from the ITA to confirm their status as non-Israeli resident, and, in the absence of such declarations or exemptions, may require the purchaser of the shares to withhold taxes at source.
Taxes Applicable to Dividends
Israeli Resident Shareholders
Israeli Resident Individuals. Israeli residents who are individuals are generally subject to Israeli income tax for dividends paid on our ordinary shares (other than bonus shares or share dividends) at 25%, or 30% if the recipient of such dividend is a Substantial Shareholder (as detailed above) at the time of distribution or at any time during the preceding 12-month period. Sapiens received a Tax Ruling, which was extended, under which dividends paid by Sapiens to Israeli shareholders who are individuals will be subject to withholding tax at source at the rate of 25% and in case of Israeli resident corporations— 0%, regardless the source of the dividends. We cannot guarantee that the Tax Ruling will be extended beyond December 31, 2026.
Israeli Resident Corporations. Israeli resident corporations are generally exempt from Israeli corporate tax for dividends paid on shares of Israeli resident corporations (like our ordinary shares and ADSs).
Non-Israeli Resident Shareholders
Non-Israeli residents (whether individuals or corporations) are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our ordinary shares or ADSs, at the rate of 25% or 30% (if the dividend recipient is a Substantial Shareholder at the time of distribution or at any time during the preceding 12-month period).
186
Sapiens received a Tax Ruling according to which dividends paid by Sapiens to non-Israeli (individuals and corporations) will be subject to withholding tax at source at a rate of 25%. We cannot guarantee that the Tax Ruling will be extended beyond December 31, 2026.
A non-Israeli resident who receives dividends from which tax was withheld is generally exempt from the obligation to file tax returns in Israel with respect to such income, provided that (i) such income was not generated from business conducted in Israel by the taxpayer, (ii) the taxpayer has no other taxable sources of income in Israel with respect to which a tax return is required to be filed and (iii) the taxpayer is not obliged to pay excess tax (as further explained below).
Excess Tax
Individuals who are subject to tax in Israel (whether any such individual is an Israeli resident or non-Israeli resident) are also subject to an additional tax at a rate of 3% on annual income exceeding NIS 721,560 for 2024 (approximately $197,850, based on an exchange rate of NIS 3.647 per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2024), which amount is generally linked to the annual change in the Israeli consumer price index (with the exception that based on Israeli new legislation such amount, and certain other statutory amounts will not be linked to the Israeli consumer price index for the years 2025-2027), including, but not limited to, dividends, interest and capital gain. According to new legislation, in effect as of January 1, 2025, an additional 2% excess tax is imposed on Capital-Sourced Income (defined as income from any source other than employment income, business income or income from “personal effort”), to the extent that the Individual’s Capital Sourced Income exceeds the specified threshold of NIS 721,560 (and regardless of the employment/business income amount of such individual). This new excess tax applies, among other things, to income from capital gains, dividends, interest, rental income, or the sale of real property.
Estate and gift tax
Israeli law presently does not impose estate or gift taxes.
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
Subject to the limitations described herein, this discussion summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs to a U.S. holder. A U.S. holder is a holder of our ordinary shares or ADSs who is:
| ● | An individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S. for U.S. federal income tax purposes |
| ● | A corporation (or another entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States, any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia |
| ● | An estate, the income of which may be included in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source |
| ● | A trust (i) if, in general, a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or (ii) an electing trust that was in existence on August 19, 1996 and was treated as a domestic trust on that date |
Unless otherwise specifically indicated, this discussion does not consider the U.S. tax consequences to a person that is not a U.S. holder (which we refer to as a non-U.S. holder) and considers only U.S. holders that will own our ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets (generally, for investment).
187
This discussion is based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, current and proposed Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code and administrative and judicial interpretations of the Code, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject to change, possibly with a retroactive effect. This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to any particular U.S. holder based on the U.S. holder’s particular circumstances. In particular, this discussion does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders who are broker-dealers, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, grantor trusts, individual retirement and tax-deferred accounts, certain former citizens or long-term residents of the U.S., tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, “financial service entities” or who own, directly, indirectly or constructively, 10% or more of the vote or value of the our outstanding shares, U.S. holders holding our ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a hedging, straddle or conversion transaction, U.S. holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, U.S. holders that acquired our ordinary shares or ADSs upon the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, and U.S holders who are persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, who may be subject to special rules not discussed below.
Additionally, the tax treatment of persons who are, or hold our ordinary shares or ADSs through a partnership or other pass-through entity is not considered, nor is the possible application of U.S. federal estate or gift taxes or any aspect of state, local or non-U.S. tax laws.
Furthermore, unless otherwise indicated, this discussion assumes that our company is not, and will not become, a “passive foreign investment company,” or a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “—Passive Foreign Investment Companies” below.
Prospective investors should be aware that this discussion does not address the tax consequences to investors who are not U.S. holders. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors as to the particular tax considerations applicable to them relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs, including the applicability of U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and non-U.S. tax laws.
Taxation of Distributions on our Ordinary Shares or ADSs
Subject to the discussion below under “Tax Consequences if We Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company,” a distribution paid by us with respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs to a U.S. holder will be treated as dividend income to the extent that the distribution does not exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Dividends that are received by U.S. holders that are individuals, estates or trusts generally will be taxed at the rate applicable to long-term capital gains, provided those dividends meet the requirements of “qualified dividend income.” The maximum long-term capital gains rate is 20% for individuals with annual taxable income that exceeds certain thresholds. In addition, higher income taxpayers must pay an additional 3.8 percent tax on net investment income to the extent certain threshold amounts of income are exceeded. See “Tax on Net Investment Income” in this Item below. For this purpose, qualified dividend income generally includes dividends paid by a foreign corporation if certain holding period and other requirements are met and either (a) the stock of the foreign corporation with respect to which the dividends are paid is “readily tradable” on an established securities market in the U.S. (e.g., the Nasdaq Global Select Market) or (b) the foreign corporation is eligible for benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the U.S. which includes an information exchange program and is determined to be satisfactory by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. Dividends that fail to meet such requirements and dividends received by corporate U.S. holders are taxed at ordinary income rates. No dividend received by a U.S. holder will be a qualified dividend (i) if the U.S. holder held the ordinary share or ADS with respect to which the dividend was paid for less than 61 days during the 121-day period beginning on the date that is 60 days before the ex-dividend date with respect to such dividend, excluding for this purpose, under the rules of Code Section 246(c), any period during which the U.S. holder has an option to sell, is under a contractual obligation to sell, has made (and not closed) a short sale of, is the grantor of a deep-in-the-money or otherwise nonqualified option to buy, or has otherwise diminished its risk of loss by holding other positions with respect to, such ordinary share or ADS (or substantially identical securities); or (ii) to the extent that the U.S. holder is under an obligation (pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respect to positions in property substantially similar or related to the ordinary share and ADS with respect to which the dividend is paid. If we were to be a “passive foreign investment company” (as such term is defined in the Code), or PFIC, for any taxable year, dividends paid on our ordinary shares or ADSs in such year or in the following taxable year would not be qualified dividends. See the discussion below regarding our PFIC status under “Tax Consequences if We Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company.” In addition, a non-corporate U.S. holder will be able to take qualified dividend income into account in determining its deductible investment interest (which is generally limited to its net investment income) only if it elects to do so; in such case the dividend income will be taxed at ordinary income rates.
188
The amount of any distribution which exceeds the amount treated as a dividend will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital, reducing the U.S. holder’s tax basis in our ordinary shares or ADSs to the extent thereof, and then as capital gain from the deemed disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs. Corporate holders will not be allowed a deduction for dividends received in respect of the ordinary shares and ADSs.
Distributions of current or accumulated earnings and profits paid in foreign currency to a U.S. holder will be includible in the income of a U.S. holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate on the day the distribution is received. A U.S. holder that receives a foreign currency distribution and converts the foreign currency into U.S. dollars subsequent to receipt may have foreign exchange gain or loss based on any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the foreign currency against the U.S. dollar, which will generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
Taxation of the Disposition of the Ordinary Shares or ADSs
Subject to the discussion below under “Tax Consequences if We Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company,” upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs, a U.S. holder will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the U.S. holder’s tax basis in our ordinary shares or ADSs. The gain or loss recognized on the disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. holder held the ordinary shares or ADSs for more than one year at the time of the disposition and would be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation for certain non-corporate U.S. holders. The maximum long-term capital gains rate is 20% for individuals with annual taxable income that exceeds certain thresholds. In addition, under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, higher income taxpayers must pay an additional 3.8 percent tax on net investment income to the extent certain threshold amounts of income are exceeded. See “Tax on Net Investment Income” in this Item below. Capital gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs held for one year or less is short-term capital gain and taxed as ordinary income. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. holder, who does not have a tax home outside the United States, on a sale, exchange or other disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations.
A U.S. holder that uses the cash method of accounting calculates the dollar value of the proceeds received on the sale as of the date that the sale settles. However, a U.S. holder that uses the accrual method of accounting is required to calculate the value of the proceeds of the sale as of the trade date and may therefore realize foreign currency gain or loss. A U.S. holder that uses the accrual method may avoid realizing foreign currency gain or loss by electing to use the settlement date to determine the proceeds of sale for purposes of calculating the foreign currency gain or loss. In addition, a U.S. holder that receives foreign currency upon disposition of its ordinary shares or ADSs and converts the foreign currency into dollars after the settlement date or trade date (whichever date the U.S. holder is required to use to calculate the value of the proceeds of sale) may have foreign exchange gain or loss based on any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the foreign currency against the dollar, which will generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
Tax Consequences if We Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company
We would be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for a taxable year if either (1) 75% or more of our gross income in the taxable year is passive income; or (2) the average percentage (by value determined on a quarterly basis) in a taxable year of our assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income is at least 50%. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other things, certain dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions and from the sale or exchange of property that gives rise to passive income. If we own (directly or indirectly) at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation, we would be treated for purposes of the foregoing tests as owning our proportionate share of the other corporation’s assets and as directly earning our proportionate share of the other corporation’s income. As discussed below, we believe that we were not a PFIC for 2023.
189
If we were a PFIC, each U.S. holder would (unless it made one of the elections discussed below on a timely basis) be taxable on gain recognized from the disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs (including gain deemed recognized if our ordinary shares or ADSs are used as security for a loan under certain conditions) and upon receipt of certain excess distributions (generally, distributions that exceed 125% of the average amount of distributions in respect to such shares received during the preceding three taxable years or, if shorter, during the U.S. holder’s holding period prior to the distribution year) with respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs as if such income had been recognized ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period for the shares. The U.S. holder’s income for the current taxable year would include (as ordinary income) amounts allocated to the current taxable year and to any taxable year prior to the first day of the first taxable year for which we were a PFIC. Tax would also be computed at the highest ordinary income tax rate in effect for each other taxable year to which income is allocated, and an interest charge on the tax as so computed would also apply. The tax liability with respect to the amount allocated to the taxable year prior to the taxable year of the distribution or disposition cannot be offset by any net operating losses. Additionally, if we were a PFIC, U.S. holders who acquire our ordinary shares or ADSs from decedents (other than nonresident aliens) would be denied the normally-available step-up in basis for such shares to fair market value at the date of death and, instead, would have a tax basis in such shares equal to the lesser of the decedent’s basis or the fair market value of such shares on the decedent’s date of death.
As an alternative to the tax treatment described above, a U.S. holder could elect to treat us as a “qualified electing fund” (a QEF), in which case the U.S. holder would be taxed, for each taxable year that we are a PFIC, on its pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and net capital gain (subject to a separate election to defer payment of taxes, which deferral is subject to an interest charge). Special rules apply if a U.S. holder makes a QEF election after the first taxable year in its holding period in which we are a PFIC. We have agreed to supply U.S. holders with the information needed to report income and gain under a QEF election if we were a PFIC. Amounts includable in income as a result of a QEF election will be determined without regard to our prior year losses or the amount of cash distributions, if any, received from us. A U.S. holder’s basis in its ordinary shares or ADSs will increase by any amount included in income and decrease by any amounts not included in income when distributed because such amounts were previously taxed under the QEF rules. So long as a U.S. holder’s QEF election is in effect with respect to the entire holding period for its ordinary shares or ADSs, any gain or loss realized by such holder on the disposition of its ordinary shares or ADSs held as a capital asset generally will be capital gain or loss. Such capital gain or loss ordinarily would be long-term if such U.S. holder had held such ordinary shares or ADSs for more than one year at the time of the disposition and would be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation for certain non-corporate U.S. holders. The maximum long-term capital gains rate is 20% for individuals with annual taxable income that exceeds certain thresholds. The QEF election is made on a shareholder-by-shareholder basis, applies to all ordinary shares or ADSs held or subsequently acquired by an electing U.S. holder and can be revoked only with the consent of the IRS. The QEF election must be made on or before the U.S. holder’s tax return due date, as extended, for the first taxable year to which the election will apply.
As an alternative to making a QEF election, a U.S. holder of PFIC stock that is “marketable stock” (e.g., “regularly traded” on the Nasdaq Global Select Market) may, in certain circumstances, avoid certain of the tax consequences generally applicable to holders of stock in a PFIC by electing to mark the stock to market as of the beginning of such U.S. holder’s holding period for our ordinary shares or ADSs. Special rules apply if a U.S. holder makes a mark-to-market election after the first year in its holding period in which we are a PFIC. As a result of such an election, in any taxable year that we are a PFIC, a U.S. holder would generally be required to report gain or loss to the extent of the difference between the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs at the end of the taxable year and such U.S. holder’s tax basis in such shares at that time. Any gain under this computation, and any gain on an actual disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs in a taxable year in which we are PFIC, would be treated as ordinary income. Any loss under this computation, and any loss on an actual disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs in a taxable year in which we are PFIC, would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent of the cumulative net-mark-to-market gain previously included. Any remaining loss from marking our ordinary shares or ADSs to market will not be allowed, and any remaining loss from an actual disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs generally would be capital loss. A U.S. holder’s tax basis in its ordinary shares or ADSs is adjusted annually for any gain or loss recognized under the mark-to-market election. There can be no assurances that there will be sufficient trading volume with respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs for the ordinary shares or ADSs to be considered “regularly traded” or that our ordinary shares or ADSs will continue to trade on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Accordingly, there are no assurances that our ordinary shares or ADSs will be marketable stock for these purposes. As with a QEF election, a mark-to-market election is made on a shareholder-by-shareholder basis, applies to all ordinary shares or ADSs held or subsequently acquired by an electing U.S. holder and can only be revoked with consent of the IRS (except to the extent our ordinary shares or ADSs no longer constitute “marketable stock”).
190
Based on an analysis of our assets and income, we believe that we were not a PFIC for 2024. We currently expect that we will not be a PFIC in 2025. The tests for determining PFIC status are applied annually and it is difficult to make accurate predictions of future income and assets, which are relevant to this determination. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will not become a PFIC in any future taxable years. U.S. holders who hold our ordinary shares or ADSs during a period when we are a PFIC will be subject to the foregoing rules, even if we cease to be a PFIC, subject to certain exceptions for U.S. holders who made QEF, mark-to-market or certain other special elections. U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors about the PFIC rules, including the consequences to them of making a mark-to-market or QEF election with respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs in the event that we qualify as a PFIC.
U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules, including eligibility for and the manner and advisability of making, the QEF election or the mark-to-market election.
Tax on Net Investment Income
A U.S. holder that is an individual or estate, or a trust that does not fall into a special class of trusts that is exempt from the tax, will be subject to a 3.8% tax on the lesser of (1) the U.S. holder’s “net investment income” for the relevant taxable year and (2) the excess of the U.S. holder’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year over a certain threshold (which in the case of individuals will be between $125,000 and $250,000, depending on the individual’s circumstances). A U.S. holder’s net investment income generally will include its dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs and net gains from dispositions of our ordinary shares or ADSs, unless those dividends or gains are derived in the ordinary course of the conduct of trade or business (other than trade or business that consists of certain passive or trading activities). Net investment income, however, may be reduced by deductions properly allocable to that income. A U.S. holder that is an individual, estate or trust is urged to consult its tax adviser regarding the applicability of the Medicare tax to its income and gains in respect of its investment in the ordinary shares or ADSs.
Non-U.S. Holders of Ordinary Shares or ADSs
A non-U.S. holder of our ordinary shares or ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on the receipt of dividends on, or the proceeds from the disposition of, our ordinary shares or ADSs, unless, in the case of U.S. federal income taxes, that item is effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a trade or business in the United States and, in the case of a resident of a country which has an income tax treaty with the United States, such item is attributable to a permanent establishment in the United States or, in the case of an individual, a fixed place of business in the United States. In addition, gain recognized on the disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs by an individual non-U.S. holder will be subject to tax in the United States if the non-U.S. holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
191
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
A U.S. holder generally is subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding at a rate of up to 28% with respect to dividend payments on, or receipt of the proceeds from the disposition of, our ordinary shares or ADSs. Backup withholding will not apply with respect to payments made to exempt recipients, including corporations and tax-exempt organizations, or if a U.S. holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that such holder is not subject to backup withholding or otherwise establishes an exemption. Non-U.S. holders are not subject to information reporting or backup withholding with respect to dividend payments on, or receipt of the proceeds from the disposition of, our ordinary shares or ADSs in the U.S., or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, provided that such non-U.S. holder provides a taxpayer identification number, certifies to its foreign status, or otherwise establishes an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax and may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a holder, or alternatively, the holder may be eligible for a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules, in either case, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Information Reporting by Certain U.S. Holders
U.S. citizens and individuals taxable as resident aliens of the United States that own “specified foreign financial assets” with an aggregate value in a taxable year in excess of certain threshold (as determined under Treasury regulations) and that are required to file a U.S. federal income tax return generally will be required to file an information report with respect to those assets with their tax returns. IRS Form 8938 has been issued for that purpose. “Specified foreign financial assets” include any financial accounts maintained by foreign financial institutions, foreign stocks held directly, and interests in foreign estates, foreign pension plans or foreign deferred compensation plans. Under those rules, our ordinary shares or ADSs, whether owned directly or through a financial institution, estate or pension or deferred compensation plan, would be “specified foreign financial assets”. Under Treasury regulations, the reporting obligation applies to certain U.S. entities that hold, directly or indirectly, specified foreign financial assets. Penalties can apply if there is a failure to satisfy this reporting obligation. A U.S. Holder is urged to consult his tax adviser regarding his reporting obligation.
The above description is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to acquisition, ownership and disposition of our Ordinary Shares or ADSs. You should consult your tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of your particular situation.
| F. | Dividends and Paying Agents |
Not applicable.
| G. | Statement by Experts |
Not applicable.
| H. | Documents on Display |
We are currently subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act that are applicable to foreign private issuers. Although as a foreign private issuer we are not required to file periodic information as frequently or as promptly as United States companies, we generally do publicly announce our quarterly and year-end results promptly and file periodic information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under cover of Form 6-K. As a foreign private issuer, we are also exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and other provisions in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Our SEC filings are filed electronically on the EDGAR reporting system and may be obtained through that medium. The SEC also maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that web site is http://www.sec.gov. The Exchange Act file number for our Securities and Exchange Commission filings is 000-29442.
192
Copies of our SEC filings and submissions are also submitted to the Israel Securities Authority, or ISA, and the TASE. Such copies can be retrieved electronically through the MAGNA distribution site of the ISA (www.magna.isa.gov.il) and the TASE website (maya.tase.co.il).
A copy of each report that we submit in accordance with applicable United States law is available for public review at our principal executive offices, at 1 Yahadut Canada Street, Or Yehuda 6037501, Israel. Information about us is also available on our website at http://www.formulasystems.com. Such information is not part of this annual report.
| I. | Subsidiary Information |
Not applicable.
| J. | Annual Report to Security Holders |
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risks relating to our operations result primarily from changes in interest rates, exchange rates, and/or weak economic conditions in the markets in which we sell our products and services. We have been monitoring and continue to actively monitor these potential exposures. To manage the volatility relating to these exposures, we may enter into various forward contracts or other hedging instruments. Our objective is to reduce, where it is deemed appropriate to do so, fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations; Impact of Inflation
In light of the nature of our activities, we invest our cash and cash equivalents primarily in short-term and long-term deposits. As of December 31, 2024, substantially all of the cash that we held was invested in dollar, Euro, Indian Rupee, Danish Krone, Swedish Krona, Polish Zloty and British Pound accounts bearing interest based on SOFR, and NIS accounts bearing interest based on the Israeli prime rate. Given the current interest rates in the financial markets, assuming a 10% interest rate decrease, the net decrease in our earnings from our financial assets would not be material, holding other variables constant.
As described above in this annual report (under “Item 3.D Risk Factors— Risks Related to Operations in Israel— Our international operations expose us to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that have been adversely affecting, and could continue to adversely affect, our business” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— Operating Results— Impact of Inflation and Currency Fluctuations on Results of Operations”), because most of our software services revenues are received in NIS, a devaluation of the NIS against the dollar adversely impacts our dollar-recorded software services revenues and operating profit, by reducing the dollar-recorded revenues for those software services. Accordingly, a devaluation of the dollar against the NIS positively impacts our dollar-recorded software services revenues and operating profit.
At the same time, a significant portion of our revenues from proprietary software products is currently denominated in dollars and other currencies, particularly British pound, Euro and Japanese yen, and, to a lesser extent, Danish Krone, Swedish Krona, Polish Zloty and Indian rupee, while a substantial portion of our expenses relating to proprietary software products, principally salaries and related personnel expenses, is denominated in NIS. As a result, the devaluation of the dollar relative to the NIS increases our operating costs (as denominated in dollars), and, therefore, adversely affects the operational profitability of our proprietary software product reporting segment. An increase in the rate of Israeli inflation compounds this negative impact by further increasing our NIS (and ultimately dollar-recorded) operating expenses, and, consequently, reducing our operational profitability in that business line. Also, the devaluation of these other currencies— particularly Euro, British pound and Japanese yen— relative to the U.S. dollar reduces our dollar-recorded revenues from sales of our proprietary software products and thereby harms our results of operations.
193
The net effect of these risks stemming from currency exchange rate fluctuations on our operating results can be quantified as follows:
A hypothetical 10% devaluation or appreciation of foreign currencies (primarily the NIS, GBP, Euro, Japanese yen, PLN and INR) against the US dollar, with all other variables held constant on the expected sales, would have resulted in a decrease or increase in 2024 sales revenues of approximately $197 million or $232 million, respectively.
Depending upon the circumstances, we will consider entering into currency hedging transactions to decrease the risk of financial exposure from fluctuations in the exchange rate of the dollar, Euro, Japanese yen and/or British Pound against the NIS, or the Euro, Japanese yen and/or British pound against the dollar. There can be no assurance that these activities, or others that we may use from time to time, will eliminate the negative financial impact of currency fluctuations and inflation. We do not— nor do we intend to in the future— engage in currency speculation.
Inflation Risk. We and some of our subsidiaries are subject to inflation risk. Given that over recent years we have expanded our global presence and offer our software solutions and services to new markets, particularly in the United States, the U.K. and Europe, inflationary pressures have been adversely impacting our operations (as they were in 2022 and early in 2023). The increased inflation in Europe and the U.S. in 2022 and early 2023 led to an increase in certain of our operating costs and expenses, such as employee compensation and office operating expenses. In addition, during periods of significant inflation, the purchasing power of our customers declined due to our customers’ rising other expenses, and customer demand for our software solutions and services was, to a certain extent, adversely impacted as a result, which negatively affected our results of operations, financial condition and prospects at the time. The reduction in inflation over the second half of 2023 and throughout 2024 mitigated these effects. We continue to monitor, on an ongoing basis, inflationary pressures and their impact on our results of operations.
Market Risk. We currently do not invest in, or otherwise hold, for trading or other purposes, any financial instruments subject to market risk.
Interest Rate Risk. We and five of our subsidiaries (Sapiens, Matrix, Magic Software, Michpal and Zap Group) account for the majority of the Group’s bank credits, loans and debentures, which are subject to interest rate risk. Sapiens, Matrix and Formula pay interest on their debentures based on a fixed interest rate which is denominated in NIS (and in the case of Sapiens is also linked to a fixed US dollar interest rate). Because both Formula and Sapiens do not have any material outstanding debt obligations other than with respect to their debentures, they have not been materially impacted by the global rise in interest rates that began in 2022. Therefore, no quantitative tabular disclosures are required. Additionally, as Matrix is impacted by interest rate risk with respect to its bank credits and loan, in an effort to hedge the risk, Matrix conducted two series B bond issuances at a fixed interest rate of 4.1%. As a result, Matrix has not been materially impacted by the global rise in interest rates that began in 2022. An increase of 1% in interest rates would have increased Matrix’s, Magic Software’s, Zap Group’s and Michpal’s combined financial expenses by approximately $1.6 million in 2024.
Fluctuations in Market Price of Securities We Hold
We hold the securities of three subsidiaries and one affiliate— Magic Software, Sapiens, Matrix and TSG Systems— which are companies whose securities are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Market, Nasdaq Global Select Market and/or the TASE. We consider these holdings to be long-term holdings. We are exposed to the risk of fluctuation of the price of these companies’ securities. All of these publicly traded companies have experienced significant historical volatility in their share prices. Fluctuations in the market price of our holdings in these companies may result in the fluctuation of the value of our assets. We typically do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our market exposure on the value of these securities.
194
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
| A. | Debt Securities |
Not applicable.
| B. | Warrants and Rights |
Not applicable.
| C. | Other Securities |
Not applicable.
| D. | American Depositary Shares |
Fees and charges payable by our ADS holders
The Bank of New York Mellon, which we refer to as the Depositary, serves as the depositary for our ADS program. Pursuant to the deposit agreement by and among our company, the Depositary and owners and holders of our ADSs, which we refer to as the Deposit Agreement, ADS holders may be required to pay various fees to the Depositary. In particular, the Depositary may charge the following fees to any party depositing or withdrawing ADSs, or to any party surrendering American Depositary Receipts (which we refer to as ADRs) that represent the ADSs, or to whom ADRs are issued (including, without limitation, issuance pursuant to a stock dividend or stock split declared by us or an exchange of stock involving the ADRs or any deposited ADSs underlying the ADRs or a distribution of ADRs pursuant to a distribution of underlying shares), as applicable:
| ● | taxes and governmental charges; |
| ● | such registration fees as may from time to time be in effect for the registration of transfers of shares generally on our share register and applicable to transfers of shares to the name of the Depositary or its nominee or agent in connection with making deposits or withdrawals under the Deposit Agreement; |
| ● | such cable, telex and facsimile transmission expenses as are expressly provided for in the Deposit Agreement; |
| ● | such expenses as are incurred by the Depositary in the conversion of foreign currency; |
| ● | a fee of $5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof) for the execution and delivery of ADRs (including in connection with distributions of shares or rights by us) and in connection with the surrender of receipts and withdrawal of the underlying shares; |
| ● | a fee of $0.02 or less per ADS (or portion thereof) for any cash distribution made pursuant to the Deposit Agreement, including in connection with distributions of shares or rights; |
| ● | a fee for the distribution of securities in connection with certain distributions, such fee being in an amount equal to the fee for the execution and delivery of ADSs which would have been charged as a result of the deposit of such securities but which securities are instead distributed by the Depositary to ADR holders; and |
| ● | any other charges payable by the Depositary or any of its agents in connection with the servicing of ADSs or other deposited securities underlying the ADRs. |
Amounts received from the Depositary
We do not receive any fees directly or indirectly from the Depositary.
195
PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2024. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that our internal control over financial reporting will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company to comply with our internal procedures, as all internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The attestation report of Ziv Haft Certified Public Accountants, a member firm of BDO International Limited, an independent registered public accounting firm in Israel, on our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 is provided on page F-4, as included under Item 18 of this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Based on the evaluation conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) under the Exchange Act, our management has concluded that there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2024, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
196
ITEM 16. RESERVED
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Tomer Jacob, who serves on the audit committee of our board of directors, qualifies as our “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the rules and regulations of the SEC.
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics, or code of ethics, applicable to Formula’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (who also serves as its principal accounting officer) and any person performing similar functions, as well as to its directors and other employees. A copy of the code of ethics is available to all of Formula’s employees, investors and others without charge, upon request to the following address: Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., 1 Yahadut Canada St., Or Yehuda 6037501, Israel, Attn: Chief Executive Officer.
The chairman of our audit committee may approve a request by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (who also serves as our principal accounting officer) or any person performing similar functions for a waiver from the requirements of our code of ethics pertaining to (i) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationship; (ii) full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we must file with, or submit to, the SEC and in other public communications made by us; (iii) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; (iv) the prompt internal reporting of violation of the code of ethics to the chairman of our audit committee; and (v) accountability for adherence to the code of ethics; provided in each case that the person requesting such waiver provides to our audit committee a full disclosure of the particular circumstances relating to such request. The chairman of our audit committee will first determine whether a waiver of the relevant requirements of the code of ethics is required and, if such waiver is required, whether a waiver will be granted. The person requesting such waiver may be required to agree to certain conditions before a waiver or a continuing waiver is granted.
Any amendments to the code of ethics and all waivers from compliance with the code of ethics granted to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (who also serves as our principal accounting officer) or any person performing similar functions with respect to its requirements described in the above paragraph will be publicly disclosed by us via a report of foreign private issuer on Form 6-K in accordance with the regulations of the SEC. No such amendment was adopted, nor waiver provided, by us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Formula and its subsidiaries and affiliate company paid the following aggregate fees for professional services rendered to us with respect to the year ended December 31, 2023 by Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, Certified Public Accountant, a member firm of Ernst & Young Global, independent registered public accounting firm (which we refer to as EY Israel), which was our independent registered public accounting firm until July 11, 2024:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| Services Rendered | 2023 | 2024 | ||||||
| Audit (1) | $ | 2,556 | $ | 835 | ||||
| Tax and other (2) | $ | 494 | $ | 517 | ||||
| Total | $ | 3,050 | $ | 1,352 | ||||
| (1) | The audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2023 were for professional services rendered for: the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements; agreed-upon procedures related to the review of our consolidated quarterly information; statutory audits of Formula and its subsidiaries and affiliated company; issuance of comfort letters and consents; and assistance with review of documents furnished to, or filed with, the SEC. |
| (2) | Tax and other fees for the year ended December 31, 2023, were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns and claims for refund, and tax advice. |
197
Formula and its subsidiaries and affiliates paid the following fees for professional services rendered to us with respect to the year ended December 31, 2024 by Ziv Haft Certified Public Accountants, a member firm of BDO International Limited, or BDO Israel, which became our independent registered public accounting firm on July 11, 2024:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| (US dollars in thousands) | ||||
| Services Rendered | ||||
| Audit (1) | $ | 1,736 | ||
| Tax and other (2) | $ | 182 | ||
| Total (3) | $ | 1,918 | ||
| (1) | The audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2024 were for professional services rendered for: the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements; agreed-upon procedures related to the review of our consolidated quarterly information; statutory audits of Formula and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies; issuance of comfort letters and consents; and assistance with review of documents furnished to, or filed with, the SEC. |
| (2) | Tax and other fees for the year ended December 31, 2024 were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns and claims for refund, and tax advice. |
| (3) | Including $1,122 for services approved prior to signing engagement letter as auditors |
Formula paid the following fees for professional services rendered by EY Israel to Formula (on a stand-alone basis, excluding services provided to the subsidiaries and affiliates of Formula) for the year ended December 31, 2023:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| (US dollars in thousands) | ||||
| Services Rendered | ||||
| Audit (1) | $ | 114 | ||
| Tax and other (2) | $ | 7 | ||
| Total | $ | 121 | ||
| (1) | The audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2023 were for professional services rendered for: the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements; agreed-upon procedures related to the review of our consolidated quarterly information; statutory audits of Formula and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies; issuance of comfort letters and consents; and assistance with review of documents furnished to, or filed with, the SEC. |
| (2) | Tax and other fees for the year ended December 31, 2023, were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns and claims for refund, and tax advice. |
198
Formula paid the following fees for professional services rendered by BDO Israel to Formula (on a stand-alone basis, excluding services provided to the subsidiaries and affiliates of Formula) for the year ended December 31, 2024:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| (US dollars in thousands) | ||||
| Services Rendered | ||||
| Audit (1) | $ | 91 | ||
| Tax and other (2) | $ | 3 | ||
| Total (3) | $ | 94 | ||
| (1) | The audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2024 were for professional services rendered for: the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements; agreed-upon procedures related to the review of our consolidated quarterly information; statutory audits of Formula and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies; issuance of comfort letters and consents; and assistance with review of documents furnished to, or filed with, the SEC. |
| (2) | Tax and other fees for the year ended December 31, 2024 were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns and claims for refund, and tax advice. |
| (3) | Including $9 for services approved prior to signing engagement letter as auditors |
Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors
Our audit committee is responsible for the oversight of our (and our subsidiaries’) independent auditor’s work. Our audit committee has adopted a policy and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent registered public accountants, BDO Israel. Pre-approval of an audit or non-audit service may be given as a general pre-approval, as part of the audit committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of our independent auditor, or on an individual basis. Any proposed services that exceed general pre-approved levels also require specific pre-approval by our audit committee. The policy prohibits retention of the independent public accountants to perform the prohibited non-audit functions defined in Section 201 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or the rules of the SEC, and also requires the audit committee to consider whether proposed services are compatible with the independence of the public accountants.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not applicable.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
None.
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
(a) On June 13, 2024, the audit committee of our board of directors recommended to the board of directors, and the board of directors approved, and submitted to our shareholders for approval at a special general meeting of shareholders held on July 11, 2024, the replacement of our then-current independent auditor, Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, registered public accounting firm, a member of Ernst & Young Global (“EY Israel”) with Ziv Haft Certified Public Accountants, a member firm of BDO International Limited, which we refer to as BDO Israel or the new auditor. At that meeting, the committee approved, and submitted to the Board for approval, BDO Israel’s replacement of EY Israel as our new auditor, and BDO Israel’s appointment to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2024, and to serve as our independent auditor for the period from the Meeting until our next annual general meeting of shareholders.
199
The remaining disclosures required by paragraph (a) of Item 16F of Form 20-F were previously reported under “Proposal 1. Replacement of Current Independent Auditor with New Independent Auditor for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2024—Background— SEC-Mandated Disclosures for Non-Renewal of Current Auditor” in the proxy statement for our special general meeting of shareholders held on July 11, 2024, which was annexed as Exhibit 99.1 to our Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K that we furnished to the SEC on June 20, 2024, which can be viewed at the following link: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045986/000104598624000005/ea020815301ex99-1_formula.htm.
(b) Not applicable.
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Nasdaq Global Select Market requires companies with securities listed thereon to comply with its corporate governance standards. As a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with all of the rules that apply to listed domestic U.S. companies. Pursuant to Nasdaq listing rule 5615(a)(3), we have notified Nasdaq that with respect to the corporate governance practices described below, we instead follow Israeli law and practice and accordingly do not follow the Nasdaq listing rules. Except for the differences described below, we do not believe there are any significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those that apply to a U.S. domestic issuer under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules.
| ● |
Majority Board Independence: Under Israeli law, there is no requirement that the majority of the members of the board of directors be independent as under Nasdaq listing rule 5605(b)(1), so long as a company appoints at least two external directors pursuant to the Companies Law and fulfills the composition requirements for the audit and compensation committees of the board. We comply with Israeli law in lieu of that Nasdaq requirement.
| |
| ● | Independent Director Oversight of Nominations: Under Israeli law, there is no requirement to have an independent nominating committee or the independent directors of a company select (or recommend for selection) director nominees, as is required under Nasdaq listing rule 5605(e) for a U.S. domestic issuer. Our board of directors handles this process, as is permitted by our articles and the Companies Law. We also need not adopt a formal board resolution or charter addressing the director nominations process and such related matters as may be required under the U.S. federal securities laws, as Nasdaq requires for a U.S. issuer. |
| ● | Shareholder Approval: Pursuant to Israeli law, we seek shareholder approval for all corporate actions requiring such approval under the requirements of the Companies Law, which are different from, or in addition to, the requirements for seeking shareholder approval under Nasdaq listing rule 5635. See “Item 10. Additional Information— Memorandum and Articles of Association— Approval of Certain Transactions Under the Companies Law” in this annual report for a description of the transactions requiring shareholder approval under the Companies Law. |
| ● | Quorums for Shareholders Meetings. The quorum for a shareholders meeting, as stipulated in our articles, complies with the provisions of Israeli law, and requires the presence, in person or by proxy of holders of 25% of our outstanding ordinary shares, in lieu of the requirement specified in Nasdaq listing rule 5620(c) under which the quorum for any shareholders meeting shall not be less than 33 and 1/3;% of the outstanding voting shares of a listed company. |
| ● | Required Timing for Annual Shareholders Meetings. Under the Companies Law, we are required to hold an annual shareholders meeting each calendar year and within 15 months of the last annual shareholders meeting, which differs from the corresponding requirement under Nasdaq listing rule 5620(a), which mandates that a listed company hold its annual shareholders meeting within one year of the company’s fiscal year-end. |
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 16I. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 16J. INSIDER TRADING POLICIES
We have
200
ITEM 16K. CYBER-SECURITY
Risk management and strategy
In implementing the processes
of our cyber-security risk assessment program, we have internal cyber-security teams and we also engage outside assessors, consultants,
We regularly assess whether
any risks from cyber-security threats are
Governance
As part of our (through our subsidiaries) corporate cybersecurity risk assessment program, we prioritize the identification and management of cybersecurity risk at several levels, including board oversight and involvement of each company’s management on an ongoing basis.
201
PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have elected to provide financial statements and related information pursuant to Item 18.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our consolidated financial statements and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm in connection therewith are filed as part of this annual report, as noted on the pages below:
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT INDEX
| * | Filed herewith. |
202
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-8858). |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the report on Form 6-K filed by the registrant with the SEC on January 18, 2012. |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed by the registrant with the SEC on June 29, 2020. |
| (4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the report of foreign private issuer on Form 6-K filed by the registrant with the SEC on January 18, 2012. |
| (5) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the annual report on Form 20-F for the 2008 fiscal year filed by the registrant with the SEC on April 27, 2009. |
| (6) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the annual report on Form 20-F for the 2013 fiscal year filed by the registrant with the SEC on April 30, 2014. |
| (7) | Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the registrant’s proxy statement for its special general meeting of shareholders held on January 12, 2023, attached as Exhibit 99.2 to the report of foreign private issuer on Form 6-K furnished by the registrant to the SEC on December 8, 2022. |
| (8) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 97.1 to the annual report on Form 20-F for the 2023 fiscal year filed by the registrant with the SEC on May 15, 2024. |
203
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
| By: | /s/ Guy Bernstein | May 14, 2025 | |
| Guy Bernstein | Date | ||
| Chief Executive Officer |
204
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024
U.S. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
INDEX
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the Company) as of December 31, 2024, and the related consolidated statements of profit or loss, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, based on our audit and the audit report of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS Accounting Standards”).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report, dated May 14, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon, based on our audit and the report of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer.
We did not audit the consolidated financial statements of Sapiens International Corporation N.V., a subsidiary of the Company. The consolidated financial statements of Sapiens International Corporation N.V. were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the adjustments to conform those consolidated financial statements to IFRS Accounting Standards were audited by Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer , whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Sapiens International Corporation N.V., under IFRS Accounting Standards is based solely on the report of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer . The consolidated financial statements of Sapiens International Corporation N.V. under IFRS Accounting Standards reflect total assets of 23% of the related consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2024, and total revenues constituting 20%, of the consolidated total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit and the report of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F-2
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Effective control
As described in Note 2(4) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company consolidates various investees despite the lack of absolute majority of voting power at the general meetings of the investees. In a situation where the Company holds less than a majority of voting power in a given entity, but that power is sufficient to enable the Company to unilaterally direct the relevant activities of such entity, then the control is exercised, and the Company consolidates the entities based on effective control. As disclosed by management, the assessment of whether the Company has effective control over an investee involves management’s judgment and analysis and considers factors such as the responsibility of the various committees, the composition of the board of directors, the shareholders structure and their level of activity, the attendance of the shareholders at the general meetings and the voting patterns.
Auditing the Company’s assessment of effective control was complex and highly judgmental due to the significant judgment of management in determining whether the Company is able to unilaterally direct the relevant activities of the entity and therefor controls the entity. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures relating to management’s application of consolidation accounting, and significant auditor judgment in evaluating the audit evidence obtained relating to the responsibility of the various organs, the composition of the board of directors, the shareholders structure and their level of activity, the attendance of the shareholders at the general meetings and the voting patterns.
The primary procedures we performed to evaluate the significant judgments made by management to assess effective control, included 1)Obtaining and understanding and testing the operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over the judgment and factors used to reach consolidation conclusions regarding these investees and 2)verifying and recalculating the procedures perform by the company including the following: evaluating the responsibility of the various committees and assessing the composition of the board of directors, the shareholders structure and their level of activity, the attendance of the shareholders at the general meetings and the voting patterns and 3)evaluating the appropriateness of the related disclosures included in Note 2(4) to the consolidated financial statements in relation to Effective control.
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2024.
| /s/ Ziv Haft | |
| Ziv Haft |
Certified Public Accountants (Isr)
BDO member firm
Tel Aviv, Israel
May 14, 2025
F-3
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the “Company’s”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the COSO criteria.
We did not audit the internal control over financial reporting of Sapiens International Corporation N.V., a subsidiary of the Company, whose financial statements reflect total assets constituting 23% of the consolidated total assets at December 31, 2024, and total revenues constituting 20%, of the consolidated total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024. Sapiens International Corporation N.V.’s internal control over financial reporting was audited by Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer , whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the effectiveness of Sapiens International Corporation N.V.’s internal control over financial reporting, is based solely on the report of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statement of financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the related consolidated statements of profit or loss, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes and our report dated May 14, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon based on our audit and the report of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit and the report of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F-4
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
| /s/ | |
| Ziv Haft |
Certified Public Accountants (Isr)
BDO member firm
May 14, 2025
F-5
 |
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer 144 Menachem Begin St. Tel-Aviv 6492102, Israel |
Tel: +972-3-6232525 Fax: +972-3-5622555 ey.com |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the Company) as of December 31, 2023, the related consolidated statements of profit or loss, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
We did not audit the financial statements of Magic Software Japan K.K., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Magic Software Enterprises Ltd., which reflect total assets of constituting 0.1% at December 31, 2023, and total revenues constituting 0.4% and 0.4% for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, of the related consolidated totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Magic Software Japan K.K., is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of EY Global
We have served as the Company’s auditor from 2010 to 2024.
Tel-Aviv, Israel
May 15, 2024
F-6
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
U.S. dollars in thousands
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| Note | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS: | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 4 | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Short-term deposits | 2 (9) | ||||||||||
| Trade receivables (net of allowances for credit losses of $ | 5 | ||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other accounts receivable | 6 | ||||||||||
| Inventories | |||||||||||
| Total current assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
| NON-CURRENT ASSETS: | |||||||||||
| Long-term investments and receivables | 7,8 | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Investments in companies accounted for at equity | 9 | ||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 10 | ||||||||||
| Right-of-use assets | 18 | ||||||||||
| Deferred taxes | 23f | ||||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | 11 | ||||||||||
| Goodwill | 12 | ||||||||||
| Total non-current assets | |||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-7
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
| December 31, | ||||||||||
| Note | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||||
| Loans from banks and others | 13,15 | $ | $ | |||||||
| Debentures | 16 | |||||||||
| Current maturities of lease liabilities | 18 | |||||||||
| Trade payables | ||||||||||
| Deferred revenues | ||||||||||
| Employees and payroll accrual | ||||||||||
| Other accounts payable | 14 | |||||||||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | 3,8 | |||||||||
| Put options of non-controlling interests | 2(17)(E) | |||||||||
| Total current liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||||
| LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | ||||||||||
| Loans from banks and others | 15 | $ | $ | |||||||
| Debentures | 16 | |||||||||
| Lease liabilities | 18 | |||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | ||||||||||
| Deferred taxes | 23f | |||||||||
| Deferred revenues | ||||||||||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | 3,8 | |||||||||
| Put options of non-controlling interests | 2(17)(E) | |||||||||
| Employee benefit liabilities | 20 | |||||||||
| Total long-term liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||||
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | 21 | |||||||||
| EQUITY | 22 | |||||||||
| Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||||
| Share capital: | ||||||||||
| Ordinary shares of NIS | ||||||||||
| Authorized: | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||||
| Retained earnings | ||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Treasury shares ( | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total equity attributable to Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. shareholders | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Non-controlling interests | 24a | |||||||||
| Total equity | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | $ | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-8
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| Note | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||||
| Proprietary software products and related services | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
| Software services and other | ||||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 2(11),24b | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||||
| Proprietary software products and related services | ||||||||||||||
| Software services and other | ||||||||||||||
| Total cost of revenues | ||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | ||||||||||||||
| Research and development expenses, net | ||||||||||||||
| Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses | 24c | |||||||||||||
| Capital gain | 9 | - | ||||||||||||
| Operating income | ||||||||||||||
| Financial expenses | 24d | |||||||||||||
| Financial income | 24d | |||||||||||||
| Pre-tax income before share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net | ||||||||||||||
| Share of profits (losses) of companies accounted for at equity, net | 9 | ( |
) | |||||||||||
| Taxes on income | 23h | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
| Attributable to: | ||||||||||||||
| Equity holders of the Company | ||||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests | ||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the Company | 24f | |||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-9
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
U.S. dollars in thousands
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Net income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax effect: | ||||||||||||
| Amounts that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | ||||||||||||
| Actuarial gain from defined benefit plans | ||||||||||||
| Gain (loss) from investments in equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Share of other comprehensive income (loss) of companies accounted for at equity | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements from functional currency to presentation currency | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Amounts that will be or that have been reclassified to profit or loss when specific conditions are met: | ||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Total Comprehensive income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Total comprehensive income attributable to: | ||||||||||||
| Equity holders of the Company | ||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests | ||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-10
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
| Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional | Other | Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share Capital | paid-in | Retained | comprehensive | Treasury | controlling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Amount | capital | earnings | income (loss) | shares (cost) | interests | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actuarial gain from defined benefit plans | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share of other comprehensive loss of companies accounted for at equity | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain from investments in equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (Note 8) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | - | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of share-based payment (Note 19) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to Formula’s shareholders | - | ( | ) | - | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transactions with non-controlling interests due to holding changes, including exercise of employees’ stock options | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Settlement and expiration of put options over non-controlling interests | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests arising from initially consolidated companies | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-11
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
| Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional | Other | Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share Capital | paid-in | Retained | comprehensive | Treasury | controlling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Amount | capital | earnings | income (loss) | shares (cost) | interests | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actuarial gain from defined benefit plans | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share of other comprehensive loss of companies accounted for at equity | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain from investments in equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (Note 8) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | - | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted shares to employees | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of share-based payment (Note 19) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to Formula’s shareholders | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transactions with non-controlling interests due to holding changes, including exercise of employees’ stock options | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of non-controlling interests | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Settlement and expiration of put options over non-controlling interests | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests arising from initially consolidated companies | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-12
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
| Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional | other | Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share Capital | paid-in | Retained | comprehensive | Treasury | controlling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Amount | capital | earnings | income (loss) | shares (cost) | interests | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actuarial gain from defined benefit plans | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share of other comprehensive loss of companies accounted for at equity | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss from investments in equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | - | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted shares to employees | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of share-based payment (Note 19) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to Formula’s shareholders | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transactions with non-controlling interests due to holding changes, including exercise of employees’ stock options | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of non-controlling interests | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Settlement of put options over non-controlling interests | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests arising from initially consolidated companies | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deconsolidation of a Matrix’s subsidiary | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 1, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-13
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation reserve arising from translating financial statements of foreign operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements from functional currency to presentation currency | ||||||||||||
| Reserve from financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Share of other comprehensive loss of companies accounted for at equity | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-14
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
U.S. dollars in thousands
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided | ||||||||||||
| by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Share of profits (losses) of companies accounted for at equity, net | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||
| Changes in value of debentures, net | ||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in employee benefit liabilities | ||||||||||||
| Gain from disposition of a subsidiary of Matrix | ( |
) | ||||||||||
| Capital gain from Initial public offering of TSG | ( |
) | ||||||||||
| Loss (gain) from sale of property, plants and equipment | ( |
) | ||||||||||
| Loss from early termination of lease | ||||||||||||
| Share-based payment expenses | ||||||||||||
| Changes in value of short-term and long-term loans from banks | ||||||||||||
| and others and deposits, net | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
| Changes in deferred taxes, net | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||
| Cash paid in respect of acquisitions of activities | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||
| Change in liability in respect of business combinations | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of premium and accrued interest on debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
| Gain from revaluation of dividend preference derivative in TSG | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||
| Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents held in currencies other than the functional currency | ( |
) | ||||||||||
| Working capital adjustments: | ||||||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in inventories | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in trade receivables | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
| Decrease in other current and long-term accounts receivable | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
| Increase in trade payables | ||||||||||||
| Increase in other accounts payable and employees and payroll accrual | ( |
) | ||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues | ( |
) | ||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-15
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
U.S. dollars in thousands
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||
| Payments for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired (Appendix C) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
| Proceeds from sale of a subsidiary of Matrix (Appendix D) | ||||||||||||
| Taxes paid in conjunction with sale of a subsidiary | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Cash paid in conjunction with deferred payments and contingent liabilities related to business combinations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loan extended to related party and others | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Purchase of intangible assets | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Purchase of investment measured using the equity method | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Purchase of other investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Purchase of financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from maturity and sale of investments in instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income or loss, net | ||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | ||||||||||||
| Dividend from companies accounted for at equity | ||||||||||||
| Payment to former shareholders of consolidated company | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Change in short-term and long-term deposits | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Capitalization of software development and other costs | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||
| Exercise of employees’ stock options in subsidiaries | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||
| Cash paid in conjunction with acquisitions of activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Dividend paid to non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Dividend to Formula’s shareholders | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Short-term bank credit, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of long-term loans from banks and others | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Receipt of long-term loans from banks and others | ||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of debentures, net | ||||||||||||
| Repayment of long-term liabilities to IIA | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of debentures | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Purchase of non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of lease liabilities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Cash paid due to exercise of put option by non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Redemption of capital note of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Payment to non-controlling interests due to put option | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Net cash used by financing activities | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-16
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
U.S. dollars in thousands
| Year ended, December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||
| A. | Supplemental cash flow information: | |||||||||||||
| Cash paid (received) in respect of: | ||||||||||||||
| Interest paid | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
| Interest received | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
| Taxes paid, net | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
| B. | Non-cash activities: | |||||||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
| Intangible assets and goodwill incurred but unpaid at year end | ||||||||||||||
| Contingent acquisition consideration | ( |
) | ||||||||||||
| Dividend payable to non-controlling interests | ||||||||||||||
| Right-of-use asset recognized with corresponding lease liability | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
| Year ended, December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||
| C. | Acquisition of newly-consolidated subsidiaries and activities, net of cash acquired: | |||||||||||||
| Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries consolidated as of acquisition date: | ||||||||||||||
| Working capital (other than cash and cash equivalents) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||
| Inventories | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Short-term investments | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Short-term deposits | - | ( | ) | |||||||||||
| Property and equipment | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Goodwill and intangible assets | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Right-of-use assets | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Other long-term assets | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Liabilities to banks and others | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Lease liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liability, net | ||||||||||||||
| Liability to formerly shareholders | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred payments and contingent consideration | ||||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests at acquisition date | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-17
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
U.S. dollars in thousands
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||
| D. | Proceeds from sale of investment in previously | |||||||||||||
| consolidated subsidiary: | ||||||||||||||
| Assets and liabilities of the subsidiary at date of sale: | ||||||||||||||
| Working capital (other than cash and cash equivalents) | $ | $ | $ | ( |
) | |||||||||
| Short-term investments | ||||||||||||||
| Property and equipment | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill and intangible assets | ||||||||||||||
| Other long-term assets | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term liabilities | ( |
) | ||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests at the sale date | ( |
) | ||||||||||||
| Gain from realization of a subsidiary | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-18
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 1:- GENERAL
| a. | General: |
Formula Systems (1985)
Ltd. (“Formula” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Israel and began its business operations in 1985. Since
1991, Formula’s ordinary shares, par value NIS
| b. | Formula is a global information technology group providing software services, proprietary and non-proprietary software solutions, software product marketing and support, computer infrastructure and integration solutions and training, integration and digital advertising solutions (the “Group”). The Group manages and operates its businesses through nine directly held subsidiaries: Matrix IT Ltd. (“Matrix”), Sapiens International Corporation N.V. (“Sapiens”), Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (“Magic Software”), Zap Group Ltd. (“ZAP Group”), Insync Staffing Solutions, Inc. (“Insync”), Michpal Technologies Ltd. (former “Michpal Micro Computers (1983) Ltd.) (“Michpal”), Ofek Aerial Photography Ltd. (“Ofek”), Shamrad Electronic (1997) Ltd. (“Shamrad”) and Hashahar Telecom and Electricity Ltd. (“Hashahar”); one jointly controlled entity— TSG IT Advanced Systems Ltd. (“TSG”); and one other associate. |
In October 2023, Israel was attacked by Hamas and other terrorist organizations operating out of the Gaza Strip and declared war in response, which has included a ground operation in the Gaza Strip. As part of the war, Hezbollah, a Lebanese terrorist group initiated missile attacks against Israel, and Israel responded, including with a ground operation in southern Lebanon. The Houthi terrorist group in Yemen and Iran have also attacked Israel with various types of missiles and drones, and Israel has responded with air force attacks. Nearby in the region, the fall of the Assad regime in Syria has led Israel to conduct limited military operations targeting Iranian military assets and infrastructure linked to Hezbollah and other Iran-supported groups. While the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ and affiliates’ facilities have not been damaged during the current war, the hostilities have caused and may continue to cause damage to private and public facilities, infrastructure, utilities, and telecommunication networks, which could potentially disrupt their operations. Currently, the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ activities in Israel remain largely unaffected. As of the date of this annual report, the impact of the war on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition is not material, but such impact may increase, and could become material, as a result of the continuation, escalation or expansion of the war.
| c. |
| Percentage of ownership | ||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Matrix | ||||||||
| Sapiens | ||||||||
| Magic Software | ||||||||
| Insync | ||||||||
| Michpal | ||||||||
| TSG(1) | ||||||||
| Ofek | ||||||||
| ZAP Group | ||||||||
| Shamrad | ||||||||
| Hashahar | ||||||||
| Other associate(1) | ||||||||
| (1) |
F-19
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 1:- general (Cont.)
| d. | Definitions: |
In these financial statements:
| The Company or Formula | - | Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. | |
| Subsidiaries | - | Companies that are controlled by the Company (as defined in IFRS 10) and whose accounts are consolidated with those of the Company. | |
| Jointly controlled entities | - | Companies owned by various entities that have a contractual arrangement for joint control and are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. | |
| Associates | - | Companies over which the Company has significant influence and that are not subsidiaries. The Company’s investment therein is included in the financial statements using the equity method of accounting. | |
| Investees | - | Subsidiaries, Jointly controlled entities, and Associates. | |
| The Group | - | Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. and its investees. | |
| Interested parties and controlling shareholder | - | As defined in the Israeli Securities Regulations (Annual Financial Statements), 2010. | |
| Related parties | - | As defined in IAS 24. |
F-20
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following accounting policies have been applied consistently in the financial statements for all periods presented, unless otherwise stated.
| 1) | Basis of presentation of the financial statements |
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS accounting standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (hereafter “IFRS”) .
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a cost basis, except for certain assets and liabilities such as: financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income; liabilities in respect of business combination; other financial assets and liabilities (including derivatives) which are presented at fair value through profit or loss; provisions; employee benefit assets and liabilities; investments in associates and joint ventures.
The Company has elected to present the profit or loss items using the function of expense method.
| 2) | Use of estimates, judgments and assumptions: |
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions, that have an effect on the application of the accounting policies and on the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the financial statements. Such estimates, judgments and assumptions are related, but not limited to, effective control and Estimate of Percentage of Completion for Measurement of Progress on Long-Term Fixed-Price Contracts. The Company’s management believes that the estimates, judgments, and assumptions used are reasonable based upon information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in accounting estimates are reported in the period of the change in estimate.
In the process of applying the accounting policies, the Group has made the following judgments which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements:
| - | Effective control: |
The Company evaluates whether it controls a company in which it holds less than the majority of the voting rights by, among others, reference to the size of its share of voting rights relative to the size and dispersion of voting rights held by the other shareholders, and by voting patterns at previous shareholders’ meetings.
| - | Estimate of Percentage of Completion for Measurement of Progress on Long-Term Fixed-Price Contracts: |
The percentage of completion is determined based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to the total estimated cost of each contract. This total cost is estimated by the Company based on assessments of expected labor costs, subcontractor costs, and other relevant factors.
F-21
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| 3) | Consolidated financial statements: |
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of companies that are controlled by the Company (subsidiaries). Control is achieved when the Company is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to unilaterally affect those returns through its power over the investee. Potential voting rights are considered when assessing whether an entity has control. The consolidation of the financial statements commences on the date on which control is obtained and ends when such control ceases.
The financial statements of the Company and of the Investees, after being adjusted to comply with IFRS, are prepared for the same reporting period and using consistent accounting treatment of similar transactions and economic activities. Any discrepancies in the applied accounting policies are eliminated by making appropriate adjustments. Significant intragroup balances and transactions and gains or losses resulting from intragroup transactions are eliminated in full in the consolidated financial statements.
| 4) | Effective control: |
In a situation where the Company holds less than a majority of voting power in a given entity, but that power is sufficient to enable the Company to unilaterally direct the relevant activities of such entity, then control is exercised. When assessing whether voting rights held by the Company are sufficient to give it power, the Company considers all facts and circumstances, including: the amount of those voting rights relative to the amount and dispersion of other vote holders; potential voting rights held by the Company and other shareholders or parties; rights arising from other contractual arrangements; significant personal ties; and any additional facts and circumstances that may indicate that the Company has, or does not have, the ability to direct the relevant activities when decisions need to be made, inclusive of voting patterns observed at previous meetings of shareholders.
The Company’s management has concluded that despite the lack of absolute majority of voting power at the general meetings of shareholders of Matrix, Sapiens and Magic Software, in accordance with IFRS 10, these investees are controlled by the Company. The conclusion regarding the existence of control during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 with respect to Matrix, Sapiens and Magic Software, in accordance with IFRS 10, was made in accordance with the following factors:
Matrix:
As of December 31,
2024, the Company held
| i) | Governing bodies of Matrix: |
Decisions of Matrix shareholders’ general meeting are taken by a simple majority of votes represented at the general meeting; the annual (ordinary) general meeting adopts resolutions to elect individual directors, appoint Matrix’s independent auditors for the next year, as well as approve Matrix’s financial statements and management’s report on operations; in accordance with Matrix’s articles of association, the board of directors of Matrix is responsible for managing its current business operations and is authorized to take substantially all decisions which are not specifically reserved to Matrix’s shareholders by its articles of association, including the decision to pay out dividends; Matrix’s board of directors is composed of 5 members, 2 of whom are external directors as required by the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999, another one of whom is an independent director, while the remaining two directors are associated with Formula, including Formula’s chief executive officer who serves as the chairman of Matrix’s board of directors.
F-22
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| ii) | Shareholding structure of Matrix: |
Matrix shareholders’ structure
may be considered dispersed because, apart from the Company, only three shareholders (both Israeli institutional investors) held more
than
Therefore it is management’s opinion that despite the lack of an absolute majority of shares in Matrix, the Company is still able to influence the appointment of directors at Matrix and therefore may affect Matrix’s strategies as well as its current business operations.
Sapiens:
As of December 31,
2024, the Company held
| i) | Governing bodies of Sapiens: |
Decisions of Sapiens shareholders’ general meeting are taken by a simple majority of votes represented at the general meeting; the annual (ordinary) general meeting adopts resolutions to appoint individual directors, choose Sapiens’ independent auditors for the next year, as well as approve the company’s financial statements and management’s report on operations; in accordance with Sapiens’ articles of association, the board of directors of Sapiens is responsible for managing its current business operations and is authorized to take substantially all decisions which are not specifically reserved to Sapiens’ shareholders by its articles of association, including the decision to pay out dividends. Sapiens’ board of directors is composed of six members, three of whom are independent directors, and the other three are associated with Formula, including Formula’s chief executive officer who serves as the chairman of Sapiens’ board of directors.
F-23
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| ii) | Shareholding structure of Sapiens: |
Sapiens shareholders’ structure
is dispersed because no other shareholder except for
Therefore, it is management’s opinion that despite the lack of an absolute majority of shares in Sapiens, the Company is still able to influence the appointment of directors at Sapiens and therefore may affect Sapiens’ strategies as well as its current business operations.
Magic Software:
As of December 31,
2024, the Company held
| i) | Governing bodies of Magic Software: |
Decisions of Magic Software shareholders’ general meeting are taken by a simple majority of votes represented at the general meeting; the annual (ordinary) general meeting adopts resolutions to elect individual directors, appoint Magic Software’s independent auditors for the next year, as well as to approve Magic Software’s financial statements and the management’s report on operations; in accordance with Magic Software’s articles of association, the board of directors of Magic Software is responsible for managing Magic Software’s current business operations and is authorized to take substantially all decisions which are not specifically reserved to Magic Software’s shareholders by its articles of association, including the decision to pay out dividends; and, Magic Software’s board of directors is composed of six members, four of whom are external or independent directors, and the other two of whom are associated with Formula, including Formula’s chief executive officer, who also serves as Magic Software’s chief executive officer.
F-24
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| ii) | Shareholders structure of Magic Software: |
Magic Software shareholders’ ownership is dispersed because,
apart from the Company, as of December 31, 2024,
Therefore, it is management’s opinion that despite the lack of an absolute majority of shares in Magic Software, the Company is still able to influence the appointment of directors at Magic Software and therefore may affect Magic Software’s strategies directions of development as well as its current business operations.
| 5) | Non-controlling interests |
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries represent the equity in subsidiaries not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Non-controlling interests are presented in equity separately from the equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company. Profit or loss and components of other comprehensive income are attributed to the Company and to non-controlling interests. Losses are attributed to non-controlling interests even if they result in a negative balance of non-controlling interests in the consolidated statement of financial position. A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as a change in equity by adjusting the carrying amount of the non-controlling interests with a corresponding adjustment of the equity attributable to equity holders of the Company less / plus the consideration paid or received. For more information regarding put options to the Non-controlling interests please see Note 2(17)(E) below.
| 6) | Business combinations and goodwill: |
Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method. The cost of the acquisition is measured at the fair value of the consideration transferred on the acquisition date with the addition of non-controlling interests in the acquiree. In each business combination, the Company determines whether to measure the non-controlling interests in the acquiree based on their fair value on the acquisition date or at their proportionate share in the fair value of the acquiree’s net identifiable assets.
Direct acquisition costs are carried to the statement of profit or loss as incurred.
F-25
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
Contingent consideration is recognized at fair value on the acquisition date and classified as a financial asset or liability in accordance with IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments”. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration are recognized in profit or loss. If the contingent consideration is classified as an equity instrument, it is measured at fair value on the acquisition date without subsequent remeasurement.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost which represents the excess of the acquisition consideration and the amount of non-controlling interests over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the resulting amount is negative, the acquirer recognizes the resulting gain on the acquisition date.
| 7) | Investment in joint arrangements: |
Joint arrangements are arrangements in which the Company has joint control. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
| i. | Joint ventures: |
In joint ventures the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. A joint venture is accounted for by using the equity method.
| 8) | Functional currency, presentation currency and foreign currency: |
| i. | Functional currency and presentation currency: |
The presentation currency of these consolidated financial statements of the Group is the U.S. dollar (the “dollar”), since the Company believes that financial statements in U.S. dollars provide more relevant information to its investors and users of the financial statements. The functional currency applied by Formula, on a stand-alone basis, Since January 1, 2019 is the NIS. The functional currencies applied by Formula’s subsidiaries and associates are the currencies of the primary economic environment in which each one of them operates.
Assets and liabilities of an investee which is a foreign operation, including fair value adjustments upon acquisition, are translated at the closing rate at each reporting date. Profit or loss items are translated at average exchange rates for all periods presented. The resulting translation differences are recognized in other comprehensive income.
Intragroup loans for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future are, in substance, a part of the investment in the foreign operation and, accordingly, the exchange rate differences from these loans (net of the tax effect) are recorded in other comprehensive income.
Upon the full or partial disposal of a foreign operation resulting in loss of control in the foreign operation, the cumulative gain (loss) from the foreign operation which had been recognized in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss. Upon the partial disposal of a foreign operation which results in the retention of control in the subsidiary, the relative portion of the amount recognized in other comprehensive income is reattributed to non-controlling interests.
F-26
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| ii. | Transactions, assets and liabilities in foreign currency: |
Transactions denominated in foreign currency are recorded upon initial recognition at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. After initial recognition, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated at each reporting date into the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. Exchange rate differences are recognized in profit or loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency and measured at cost are translated at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency and measured at fair value are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined.
| 9) | Short-term deposits: |
Short-term deposits are deposits with an original maturity of more than three months from the date of investment and which do not meet the definition of cash equivalents. The deposits are presented according to their terms of deposit. Restricted deposits include deposits used to secure certain subsidiaries’ ongoing projects, as well as security deposits with respect to leases, and are classified under other short-term and long-term receivables.
As of December 31,
2024, the Group have dollar deposits in the amount of approximately
| 10) | Inventories: |
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The cost of inventories comprises costs of purchase and costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are mainly comprised of purchased merchandise and products which consist of educational software kits, computers, peripheral equipment and spare parts. Cost is determined on the “first in – first out” basis. The Group periodically evaluates the condition and aging of its inventories and makes provisions for slow-moving inventories accordingly. No such impairments have been recognized in any period presented.
| 11) | Revenue recognition: |
Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized when the control over the goods or services is transferred to the customer. The transaction price is the amount of consideration that is expected to be received based on the contract terms, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties (such as taxes).
In determining the amount of revenue from contracts with customers, the Group evaluates whether it is a principal or an agent in the arrangement. The Group is a principal when the Group controls the promised goods or services before transferring them to the customer. In these circumstances, the Group recognizes revenue for the gross amount of the consideration. When the Group is an agent, it recognizes revenue for the net amount of the consideration, after deducting the amount due to the principal.
F-27
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
Sale of software licensing, maintenance services and post implementation consulting services
A software licensing transaction that does not require significant implementation services is considered a distinct performance obligation, as the customer can benefit solely from the software on its own or together with other readily available resources.
The Group recognizes revenue from software licensing transactions at a point in time when the Group provides the customer a right to use the Group’s intellectual property as it exists at the point in time at which the license is granted to the customer. The Group recognizes revenue from software licensing transactions over time when the Group provides the customer a right to access the Group’s intellectual property throughout the license term. The Group may generate revenue from the sale of software licensing which includes significant implementation and customization services. In such contracts the Group is normally committed to providing the customer with a functional IT system and the customer can only benefit from such a functional system, being the final product that would normally be comprised of proprietary licenses and significant related services. Revenues from these contracts are based on either fixed price or time and material.
Software licensing transactions which involve significant implementation, customization, or integration of the Group’s software license to customer-specific requirements, are considered as one performance obligation satisfied over-time.
When post implementation and consulting services do not involve significant customization, the Group accounts for such services as performance obligations satisfied over time and revenues are recognized as the services are provided.
Revenue from maintenance is recognized over time, during the period the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the Group’s performance. When payments from customers are made before or after the service is performed, the Group recognizes the resulting contract asset or liability.
Sale of hardware and infrastructure
Revenue from the sale of hardware and infrastructure is recognized in profit or loss at the point in time when the control of the goods is transferred to the customer, generally upon delivery of the goods to the customer.
F-28
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
Sales of training and implementation services
Revenues from training and implementation services are recognized when the service is provided. Revenue from training services in respect of public courses whose operating range is up to 3 months is recognized at the end of the course period. Revenues from training services in respect of long-term courses will be recognized over the term of the course. Revenues from implementation projects ordered by organizations is recognized according to actual inputs (actually worked hours).
Revenue of contracts according to actual inputs
Revenue from framework agreements for the performance of work according to actual inputs is recognized according to the hours invested.
Revenue of Long-Term fixed price contracts
Revenue from long-term fixed-price contracts that involve significant implementation, customization, or integration to customer-specific requirements is recognized over time. The underlying deliverable is owned and controlled by the customer or does not create an asset with an alternative use to the Group and the Group has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed throughout the duration of the contract.
The Group applies a cost-based input method for measuring the progress of performance obligations that are satisfied over time. In applying this cost-based input method, the Group estimates the costs to complete contract performance in order to determine the amount of revenue to be recognized. These estimated costs include the direct costs and the indirect costs that are directly attributable to a contract based on a reasonable allocation method. In certain circumstances, the Group is unable to measure the outcome of a contract, but the Group expects to recover the costs incurred in fulfilling the contract as of the reporting date. In such circumstances, the Group recognizes revenue to the extent of the costs incurred as of the reporting date until such time as the outcome of the contract can be reasonably measured. If a loss is anticipated from a contract, the loss is recognized in full regardless of the percentage of completion.
When appropriate, the Group also applies a practical expedient permitted under IFRS 15 whereby if the Group has a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Group’s performance completed to date (for example, a service contract in which an entity bills a fixed amount for each hour of service provided), the Group may recognize revenue in the amount it is entitled to invoice. Deferred revenues, which represent a contract liability, include unearned amounts received under maintenance and support (mainly) and amounts received from customers for which revenues have not yet been recognized.
F-29
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
Allocating the transaction price
For contracts that consist of more than one performance obligation, at contract inception the Group allocates the contract transaction price to each performance obligation identified in the contract on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. The stand-alone selling price is the price at which the Group would sell the promised goods or services separately to a customer. The Group determines the stand-alone selling price for the purposes of allocating the transaction price to each performance obligation by considering several external and internal factors including, but not limited to, transactions where the specific performance obligation is sold separately, historical actual pricing practices and geographies in which the Group offers its products and services. If a specific performance obligation, such as the software license, is sold for a broad range of amounts (that is, the selling price is highly variable) or if the Group has not yet established a price for that good or service, and the good or service has not previously been sold on a stand-alone basis (that is, the selling price is uncertain), the Group applies the residual approach whereby all other performance obligations within a contract are first allocated a portion of the transaction price based upon their respective stand-alone selling prices, with any residual amount of transaction price allocated to the remaining specific performance obligation.
Variable consideration
The Group determines the transaction price separately for each contract with a customer. When exercising this judgment, the Group evaluates the effect of each variable amount in the contract, taking into consideration discounts, penalties, variations, claims, and non-cash consideration. In determining the effect of the variable consideration, the Group normally uses the “most likely amount” method described in the Standard. Pursuant to this method, the amount of the consideration is determined as the single most likely amount in the range of possible consideration amounts in the contract. According to the Standard, variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
Costs of obtaining a contract
In order to obtain certain contracts with customers, the Group incurs incremental costs in obtaining the contract (such as sales commissions which are contingent on making binding sales). Costs incurred in obtaining the contract with the customer which would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained and which the Group expects to recover are recognized as an asset and amortized on a systematic basis that is consistent with the provision of the services under the specific contract. An impairment loss in respect of capitalized costs of obtaining a contract is recognized in profit or loss when the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the remaining amount of consideration that the Group expects to receive for the goods or services to which the asset relates, less the costs that relate directly to providing those goods or services and that have not been recognized as expenses.
The Group has elected to apply the practical expedient allowed by IFRS 15 according to which incremental costs of obtaining a contract are recognized as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset is one year or less.
F-30
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
Revenues that include warranty services
In certain cases, the Group also provides a warranty for goods and services sold (i.e., extended warranties when the Group contractually undertakes to repair any errors in the delivered software within a strictly specified time limit and/or when the scope of which is broader than just an assurance to the customer that the product/service complies with agreed-upon specifications). The Group has ascertained that such warranties granted by the Group meet the definition of service. The conclusion regarding the extended nature of a warranty is made whenever the Group contractually undertakes to repair any errors in the delivered software within a strictly specified time limit and/or when such warranty is more extensive than the minimum required by law. Under IFRS 15, the fact of granting an extended warranty indicates that the Group provides an additional service. As such, the Group recognizes an extended warranty as a separate performance obligation and allocates a portion of the transaction price to such service. In all cases where an extended warranty is accompanied by a maintenance service, which is even a broader category than the extended warranty itself, revenues are recognized over time because the customer consumes the benefits of such service as it is performed by the provider. If this is the case, the Group continues to allocate a portion of the transaction price to such maintenance service. Likewise, in cases where a warranty service is provided after the project completion and is not accompanied by any maintenance service, then a portion of the transaction price and, analogically, recognition of a portion of contract revenues will have to be deferred until the warranty service is actually fulfilled.
Disaggregation of revenue
Service revenue includes contracts primarily for the provision of supplies and services other than design, development, customization, implementation, software maintenance and support and software updates associated with delivery of products or proprietary software. It may be a stand-alone service contract or a service performance obligation which is distinct from a contract or performance obligation for design, development, customization, support and upgrade or delivery of product. The Group’s service contracts include contracts in which the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided as the performance obligations are satisfied. The Group’s service contracts primarily include operation-type contracts, outsourcing, consulting, remote development services, digital advertising management, training and similar activities.
Transaction prices allocated to performance obligation
Remaining performance
obligations represent contract revenue that has not yet been recognized, which includes deferred revenue and amounts that will be invoiced
and recognized as revenue in future periods. The aggregate amount of consideration allocated to performance obligations either not satisfied
or partially unsatisfied was approximately $
F-31
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| 12) | Income tax: |
Current or deferred taxes are recognized in profit or loss, except to the extent that they relate to items which are recognized in other comprehensive income or equity.
| ● | Current taxes: |
The current tax liability is measured using the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date as well as adjustments required in connection with the tax liability in respect of previous years.
| ● | Deferred taxes: |
Deferred taxes are computed in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts in the financial statements and the amounts attributed for tax purposes. Deferred taxes are measured at the tax rate that is expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is not probable that they will be utilized. Deductible carryforward losses and temporary differences for which deferred tax assets had not been recognized are reviewed at each reporting date and a respective deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that their utilization is probable.
Taxes that would apply in the event of the disposal of investments in investees have not been considered in computing deferred taxes, as long as the disposal of the investments in investees is not probable in the foreseeable future. Also, deferred taxes that would apply in the event of distribution of earnings by investees as dividends have not been considered in computing deferred taxes, since the distribution of dividends does not involve an additional tax liability or since it is the Group’s policy not to initiate distribution of dividends from a subsidiary that would trigger an additional tax liability. Taxes on income that relate to distributions of an equity instrument and to transaction costs of an equity transaction are accounted for pursuant to IAS 12. Deferred taxes are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset a current tax asset against a current tax liability and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxpayer and the same taxation authority.
| 13) | Leases: |
The Group accounts for a contract as a lease when the contract terms convey the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
| i) | The Group as lessee: |
For leases in which the Group is the lessee, the Group recognizes on the commencement date of the lease a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, excluding leases whose term is up to twelve months and leases for which the underlying asset is of low value. For these excluded leases, the Group has elected to recognize the lease payments as an expense in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In measuring the lease liability, the Group has elected to apply the practical expedient in the Standard and does not separate the lease components from the non-lease components (such as management and maintenance services, etc.) included in a single contract.
F-32
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
Leases which entitle employees to a company car as part of their employment terms are accounted for as employee benefits in accordance with the provisions of IAS 19 and not as subleases.
On the commencement date, the lease liability includes all unpaid lease payments discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease, if that rate can be readily determined, or otherwise using the Group’s incremental borrowing rate. After the commencement date, the Group measures the lease liability using the effective interest rate method.
On the commencement date, the right-of-use asset is recognized in an amount equal to the lease liability plus lease payments already made on or before the commencement date and initial direct costs incurred. The right-of-use asset is measured applying the cost model and depreciated over the shorter of its useful life and the lease term.
Following are the amortization periods of the right-of-use assets by class of underlying asset:
| Years | Mainly | |||
| Land and Buildings | ||||
| Motor vehicles |
The Group tests for impairment of the right-of-use asset whenever there are indications of impairment pursuant to the provisions of IAS 36.
| ii) | Lease extension and termination options: |
A non-cancelable lease term includes both the periods covered by an option to extend the lease when it is reasonably certain that the extension option will be exercised and the periods covered by a lease termination option when it is reasonably certain that the termination option will not be exercised.
In the event of any change in the expected exercise of the lease extension option or in the expected non-exercise of the lease termination option, the Group remeasures the lease liability based on the revised lease term using a revised discount rate as of the date of the change in expectations. The total change is recognized in the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset until it is reduced to zero, and any further reductions are recognized in profit or loss.
| iii) | Lease modifications: |
If a lease modification does not reduce the scope of the lease and does not result in a separate lease, the Group remeasures the lease liability based on the modified lease terms using a revised discount rate as of the modification date and records the change in the lease liability as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset. If a lease modification reduces the scope of the lease, the Group recognizes a gain or loss arising from the partial or full reduction of the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset and the lease liability. The Group subsequently remeasures the carrying amount of the lease liability according to the revised lease terms, at the revised discount rate as of the modification date and records the change in the lease liability as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset.
F-33
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| 14) | Property, plant and equipment, net: |
Property, plant and equipment are measured at cost, including directly attributable costs, less accumulated depreciation, accumulated impairment losses and any related investment grants and excluding day-to-day servicing expenses. Cost includes spare parts and auxiliary equipment that are used in connection with plant and equipment. The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment comprises the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which the item is located.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the assets at annual rates as follows:
| % | ||
| Computers, software, and peripheral equipment | ||
| Office furniture and equipment | ||
| Motor vehicles |
Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the lease (including option terms that are deemed to be reasonably assured) or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
The useful life, the depreciation method and the residual value of an asset are reviewed at least each year-end (at the end of the year) and any changes are accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate. Depreciation of an asset ceases at the earlier of the date that the asset is classified as held for sale and the date that the asset is derecognized. For impairment testing of property, plant and equipment, see note 2(16) below.
| 15) | Intangible assets, net: |
Separately acquired intangible assets are measured on initial recognition at cost including directly attributable costs. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are measured at fair value at the acquisition date. Expenditures relating to internally generated intangible assets, excluding capitalized development costs, are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their useful life and reviewed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired. The amortization period and the amortization method for an intangible asset are reviewed at least at each year- end.
Capitalized software costs are measured at cost less any accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses on a product-by-product basis. Amortization of capitalized software costs begins when the development is complete, and the product is available for use or for sale. The Company considers a product to be available for use when the Company completes its internal validation of the product that is necessary to establish that the product meets its design specifications including functions, features, and technical performance requirements. Internal validation includes the completion of coding, documentation and testing that ensure bugs are reduced to a minimum. The internal validation of the product takes place a few weeks before the product is made available to the market. In certain instances, the Company enters into a short pre-release stage, during which the product is made available to a selected number of customers as a beta program for their own review and familiarization. Subsequently, the release is made generally available to customers. Once a product is considered available for use, the capitalization of costs ceases and amortization of such costs to “cost of sales” begins.
F-34
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
Capitalized software
costs are amortized on a product-by-product basis by the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software product (between
Other intangible assets
Intangible assets
excluding capitalized development costs are comprised mainly of customer-related intangible assets, backlogs, acquired technology and
patent, and are amortized over their useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits
of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise used up.
| Years | ||
| Customer relationship, backlog and distribution rights | ||
| Acquired technology | ||
| Patents | ||
Gains or losses arising from the derecognition of an intangible asset are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and are recognized in profit or loss.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not systematically amortized and are tested for impairment annually or whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The useful life of these assets is reviewed annually to determine whether their indefinite life assessment continues to be supportable. If the events and circumstances do not continue to support the assessment, the change in the useful life assessment from indefinite to finite is accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate, and on that date the asset is tested for impairment. Commencing from that date, the asset is amortized systematically over its useful life.
| 16) | Impairment of non-financial assets: |
The Group evaluates the need to record an impairment of non-financial assets (property, plant and equipment, capitalized software costs and other intangible assets, goodwill, investments in joint venture) whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount is not recoverable. If the carrying amount of non-financial assets exceeds their recoverable amount, the assets are reduced to their recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of sale and value in use. In measuring value in use, the expected future cash flows are discounted using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the risks specific to the asset. The recoverable amount of an asset that does not generate independent cash flows is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss.
An impairment loss of an asset, other than goodwill, is reversed only if there have been changes in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. Reversal of an impairment loss, as above, shall not be increased above the lower of the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of depreciation or amortization) had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years and its recoverable amount. The reversal of impairment loss of an asset presented at cost is recognized in profit or loss.
F-35
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
The following criteria are applied in assessing impairment of these specific assets:
| i. | Goodwill in respect of subsidiaries: |
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated, at the acquisition date, to each of our cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. The Group reviews goodwill for impairment once a year, on December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that there is an impairment.
Goodwill is tested for impairment by assessing the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit (or group of cash-generating units) to which the goodwill has been allocated.
An impairment loss is recognized if the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit (or group of cash-generating units) to which goodwill has been allocated is less than the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit (or group of cash-generating units). Any impairment loss is allocated first to goodwill. Impairment losses recognized for goodwill cannot be reversed in subsequent periods.
The discounted cash flow method is used to determine the recoverable amount (value in use) of a cash-generating unit or the group of cash-generating units to which goodwill is allocated. The projected cash flows are derived from the budget for the next five years and do not include restructuring activities to which the Company is not yet committed or significant future investments that will enhance the performance of the assets of the cash-generating unit being tested. The recoverable amount is sensitive to key assumptions used by the Company’s management to determine the recoverable amount, including discount rates and future growth rate. The discount rates are calculated based on a risk-free rate of interest and a market risk premium. The discount rates reflect the current market assessment of the risks specific to each group of cash-generating units by taking into account specific group information on beta factors, leverage and cost of debt. The Company performed annual impairment tests as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 and did not identify any impairment losses.
| ii. | Investment in associate or joint venture using the equity method: |
After application of the equity method, the Group determines whether it is necessary to recognize any additional impairment loss with respect to the investment in associates or joint ventures. The Group determines at each reporting date whether there is objective evidence that the carrying amount of the investment in the associate or the joint venture is impaired. The test of impairment is carried out with reference to the entire investment, including the goodwill attributed to the associate or the joint venture.
| iii. | Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life / capitalized development costs that have not yet been systematically amortized: |
The impairment test is performed annually, on December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that there is an impairment.
During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, impairment indicators were identified.
F-36
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| 17) | Financial instruments: |
| A. | Financial assets: |
Financial assets are measured upon initial recognition at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial assets, except for financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss in respect of which transaction costs are recorded in profit or loss.
| B. | Financial liabilities: |
| i. | Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost: |
Financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value less transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issue of the financial liability. After initial recognition, the Group measures all financial liabilities at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, except for:
| ● | Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, such as derivatives; |
| ● | Financial liabilities that arise when a transfer of a financial asset does not qualify for derecognition or when the continuing involvement approach applies; |
| ● | Financial guarantee contracts; and |
| ● | Contingent consideration recognized by an acquirer in a business combination as to which IFRS 3 applies. |
| ii. | Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss: |
At initial recognition, the Group measures financial liabilities that are not measured at amortized cost at fair value. Transaction costs are recognized in profit or loss. After initial recognition, changes in fair value are recognized in profit or loss.
| C. | Derecognition of financial liabilities: |
A financial liability is derecognized when it is extinguished, that is, when the obligation is discharged or cancelled or expires. A financial liability is extinguished when the debtor discharges the liability by paying in cash, other financial assets, goods or services or is legally released from the liability.
When there is a modification to the terms of an existing financial liability, the Group evaluates whether the modification is substantial.
If the terms of an existing financial liability are substantially modified, such modification is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference between the carrying amounts of the above liabilities is recognized in profit or loss.
F-37
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
If the modification is not substantial, the Group recalculates the carrying amount of the liability by discounting the revised cash flows at the original effective interest rate and any resulting difference is recognized in profit or loss.
| D. | Compound financial instruments: |
| i) | Convertible debentures which contain both an equity component and a liability component are separated into two components. This separation is performed by first determining the liability component based on the fair value of an equivalent non-convertible liability. The value of the conversion component is determined to be the residual amount. Directly attributable transaction costs are apportioned between the equity component and the liability component based on the allocation of proceeds to the equity and liability components. |
| ii) | Convertible debentures that are denominated in foreign currency contain two components: the conversion component and the debt component. The liability conversion component is initially recognized as a financial derivative at fair value. The balance is attributed to the debt component. Directly attributable transaction costs are allocated between the liability conversion component and the liability debt component based on the allocation of the proceeds to each component. |
| E. | Put option granted to non-controlling interests: |
When the Group grants to non-controlling interests a put option to sell part or all of their interests in a subsidiary, during a certain period, even if such purchase obligation is conditional on the counterparty’s exercise of its contractual right to cause such redemption, if the put option agreement does not transfer to the Group any benefits incidental to ownership of the equity instrument (i.e. the Group does not have a present ownership in the shares concerned) then at the end of each reporting period the non-controlling interests (to which a portion of net profit attributable to non-controlling interests is allocated) are classified as a financial liability, as if such put-able equity instrument was redeemed on that date. The difference between the non-controlling interests carrying amount at the end of the reporting period and the present value of the liability is recognized directly in equity of the Group, under “Additional paid-in capital”.
The Group remeasures the financial liability at the end of each reporting period based on the estimated present value of the consideration to be transferred upon the exercise of the put option.
If the option is exercised in subsequent periods, the consideration paid upon exercise is treated as settlement of the liability. If the put option expires, the liability is settled and a portion of the investment in the subsidiary is accounted for as if it was disposed of, without loss of control therein.
If the Group has present ownership of the non-controlling interests, these non-controlling interests are accounted for as if they are held by the Group, and changes in the amount of the liability are carried to profit or loss.
F-38
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| 18) | Fair value measurement: |
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurement is based on the assumption that the transaction will take place in the asset’s or the liability’s principal market, or in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. Fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant’s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities measured at fair value or for which fair value is disclosed are categorized into levels within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the entire fair value measurement:
| Level 1 | - | quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| Level 2 | - | inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable directly or indirectly. |
| Level 3 | - | inputs that are not based on observable market data (valuation techniques which use inputs that are not based on observable market data). |
| 19) | Provisions: |
A provision in accordance with IAS 37 is recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are measured according to the estimated future cash flows discounted using a pre-tax interest rate that reflects the market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, those risks specific to the liability. When the Group expects part or all of the expense to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense is recognized in the statement of profit or loss net of any reimbursement.
F-39
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
The following are the types of provisions included in the financial statements:
| i. | Legal claims: |
A provision for claims is recognized when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is more likely than not that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required by the Group to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
| ii. | Contingent liability recognized in a business combination: |
A contingent liability in a business combination is measured at fair value upon initial recognition. In subsequent periods, it is measured at the higher of the amount initially recognized less, when appropriate, cumulative amortization, and the amount that would be recognized at the end of the reporting period in accordance with IAS 37.
| 20) | Employee benefit liabilities: |
The Group maintains several employee benefit plans:
| i. | Short-term employee benefits: |
Short-term employee benefits are benefits that are expected to be settled wholly before twelve (12) months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the employees render the related services. These benefits include salaries, paid annual leave, paid sick leave, recreation and social security contributions and are recognized as expenses as the services are rendered. A liability in respect of a cash bonus or a profit-sharing plan is recognized when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation to make such payment as a result of past service rendered by an employee and a reliable estimate of the amount can be made. The short-term employee benefit liability in the statement of financial position is measured on an undiscounted basis.
| ii. | Post-employment benefits: |
The plans are normally financed by contributions to insurance companies and classified as defined contribution plans or as defined benefit plans.
Formula’s and its Israeli subsidiaries and associates accounted for at equity (as defined with respect to their Israeli employee contribution plans pursuant to section 14 of Israel’s Severance Pay Law, 1963 (the “Severance Pay Law”)) pay fixed contributions to those plans and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions if the fund into which those contributions are paid does not hold sufficient amounts to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods. Contributions to the defined contribution plan in respect of severance or retirement pay are recognized as an expense when contributed concurrently with performance of the employee’s services.
F-40
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
Formula and its Israeli subsidiaries and companies accounted for at equity also operate a defined benefit plan in respect of severance or retirement pay to their Israeli employees pursuant to the Severance Pay Law. According to the Severance Pay Law, employees are entitled to severance pay upon dismissal or retirement. The liability for termination of employment is measured using the projected unit credit method. The actuarial assumptions include rates of employee turnover and future salary increases based on the estimated timing of payment. The amounts are presented based on discounted expected future cash flows using a discount rate determined by reference to market yields at the reporting date on high quality corporate bonds that are linked to Israel’s Consumer Price Index with a term that is consistent with the estimated term of the severance pay obligation. In respect of its severance pay obligation to certain of its employees, the Group makes current deposits in pension funds and insurance companies (the “plan assets”). Plan assets comprise assets held by a long-term employee benefit fund or qualifying insurance policies. Plan assets are not available to the Group’s own creditors and cannot be returned directly to the Group.
The liability for employee benefits shown in the statement of financial position reflects the present value of the defined benefit obligation, less the fair value of the plan assets. Remeasurements of the net liability are recognized in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur.
Severance expenses
for the years 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $
| iii. | Other long-term employee benefits: |
Certain employees of the Group are entitled to benefits in respect of adaptation grants. These benefits are accounted for as other long-term benefits since the Group estimates that these benefits will be utilized and the Group’s respective obligation will be settled during the employment period and more than twelve months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the employees rendered the related service.
The Group’s net obligation for other long-term employee benefits, which is computed based on actuarial assumptions, is for the future benefit due to employees for services rendered in the current period and in prior periods and considering expected salary increases. The amount of these benefits is discounted to its present value. The discount rate is determined by reference at the reporting date to market yields on high quality corporate bonds that are linked to the Consumer Price Index and whose term is consistent with the term of the Group’s obligation.
Remeasurement of the net obligation is recognized in the statement of comprehensive income in the period incurred.
F-41
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
| 21) | Share-based payment transactions: |
The Group’s employees and certain service providers are entitled to remuneration in the form of equity-settled share-based payment transactions. The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured at the fair value of the equity instruments granted at the grant date. The fair value is determined using an acceptable option pricing model.
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognized in profit or loss together with a corresponding increase in equity during the period which the performance and/or service conditions are to be satisfied ending on the date on which the relevant employees become entitled to the award (the “vesting period”). The cumulative expense recognized for equity-settled transactions at the end of each reporting period until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and the Group’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. No expense is recognized for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other vesting conditions (service and/or performance) are satisfied.
If the Group modifies the conditions on which equity instruments were granted, an additional expense is recognized for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement or is otherwise beneficial to the employee/other service provider at the modification date.
If a grant of an equity instrument is canceled, it is accounted for as if it had vested on the cancelation date and any expense not yet recognized for the grant is recognized immediately. However, if a new grant replaces the canceled grant and is identified as a replacement grant on the grant date, the canceled and new grants are accounted for as a modification of the original grant, as described above.
| 22) | Concentration of credit risk: |
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Group to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposits, restricted cash, trade receivables.
The majority of the Group’s cash and cash equivalents, deposits, and other financial instruments are invested with major banks in Israel, the United States and across Europe. The Group’s management believes that these financial instruments are held in financial institutions with high credit standing, and accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these investments. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits in the United States may be in excess of insured limits and are not insured in other jurisdictions. Generally, these banks deposits may be redeemed upon demand and therefore bear minimal risk.
The Group’s trade receivables are generally derived from sales to large organizations located mainly in Israel, North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. The Group performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers using a reliable outside source to determine payment terms and credit limits which are approved based on the size of the customer and to date has not experienced any material losses. In certain circumstances, Formula and its subsidiaries and companies accounted for at equity may require letters of credit, other collateral or additional guarantees.
F-42
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
The Group maintains an allowance for credit losses based upon management’s experience and estimate of collectability of each outstanding invoice. The allowance for credit losses is determined with respect to specific debts or which collection is doubtful. The risk of collection associated with accounts receivable is mitigated by the diversity and number of customers.
| 23) | Liquidity risk: |
Liquidity risk arises from managing the Group’s working capital as well as from financial expenses and principal payments of the Group’s debt instruments. Liquidity risk consists of the risk that the Group will have difficulty in fulfilling obligations relating to financial liabilities. The Group’s policy is to ascertain constant cash adequacy needed for settling its liabilities when due. For this purpose, the Group aims to hold cash balances (or adequate credit lines) that will meet anticipated demands.
Formula and its subsidiaries and companies accounted for at equity examine cash flow forecasts on a monthly basis as well as information regarding cash balances. As of the reporting date, these forecasts indicate that the Group can expect sufficient liquid sources for covering its entire liabilities under reasonable assumptions.
| 24) | Changes in accounting policies – initial adoption of new financial reporting and accounting standards: |
| 1. | Amendment to IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements”: |
In January 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements” regarding the criteria for determining the classification of liabilities as current or non-current (“the Original Amendment”). In October 2022, the IASB issued a subsequent amendment (“the Subsequent Amendment”).
According to the Subsequent Amendment:
| ● | Only financial covenants with which an entity must comply on or before the reporting date will affect a liability’s classification as current or non-current. |
| ● | In respect of a liability for which compliance with financial covenants is to be evaluated within twelve months from the reporting date, disclosure is required to enable users of the financial statements to assess the risks related to that liability. The Subsequent Amendment requires disclosure of the carrying amount of the liability, information about the financial covenants, and the facts and circumstances at the end of the reporting period that could result in the conclusion that the entity may have difficulty in complying with the financial covenants. |
F-43
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
According to the Original Amendment, the conversion option of a liability affects the classification of the entire liability as current or non-current unless the conversion component is an equity instrument. The Original Amendment and Subsequent Amendment are both effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024 and must be applied retrospectively.
The Group applied the Amendments to its consolidated financial statements. The Amendments did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
| 2. | Amendments to IAS 7, “Statement of Cash Flows”, and IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures”: |
In May 2023, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 7, “Statement of Cash Flows”, and IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures” (“the Amendments”) to address the presentation of liabilities and the associated cash flows arising out of supplier finance arrangements, as well as disclosures required for such arrangements.
The disclosure requirements in the Amendments are intended to assist users of financial statements in understanding the effects of supplier finance arrangements on an entity’s liabilities, cash flows and exposure to liquidity risk.
The Amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024.
F-44
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 2:- ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
The Amendments did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
| 25) | Disclosure of Newly Issued but Not Yet Effective IFRS Standards |
| 1. | International Financial Reporting Standard 18 – Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements |
In April 2024, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued International Financial Reporting Standard 18 (IFRS 18), Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements (hereinafter: “the new standard”), which replaces International Accounting Standard 1 (IAS 1), Presentation of Financial Statements (hereinafter: “IAS 1”). The objective of the new standard is to enhance comparability and transparency in financial statements.
The new standard incorporates existing IAS 1 requirements as well as new presentation requirements for the statement of profit or loss, including the presentation of required subtotals and line items, disclosure of management-defined performance measures, and new requirements for aggregation and disaggregation of financial information.
The new standard does not change the recognition and measurement principles for items in the financial statements. However, since items in the statement of profit or loss must be classified into one of five categories (operating activities, investing activities, financing activities, income taxes, and discontinued operations), it may affect an entity’s operating profit. In addition, the issuance of the new standard has led to limited amendments to other accounting standards, including IAS 7, Statement of Cash Flows, and IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting.
The new standard is required to be applied retrospectively for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2027. According to the Securities Authority’s decision, early adoption is permitted, with disclosure required starting from periods beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
The company is assessing the impact of the new standard, including the effects of the amendments to other accounting standards resulting from the new standard, on the consolidated financial statements.
| 2. | Amendments to IAS 21, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”: |
In August 2023, the IASB issued “Amendments to IAS 21: Lack of Exchangeability (Amendments to IAS 21, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”)” (“the Amendments”) to clarify how an entity should assess whether a currency is exchangeable and how it should measure and determine a spot exchange rate when exchangeability is lacking.
The Amendments set out the requirements for determining the spot exchange rate when a currency lacks exchangeability. The Amendments require disclosure of information that will enable users of financial statements to understand how a currency not being exchangeable affects or is expected to affect the entity’s financial performance, financial position and cash flows.
The Amendments apply for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2025. Earlier adoption is permitted, in which case, an entity is required to disclose that fact. When applying the Amendments, an entity should not restate comparative information. Instead, if the foreign currency is not exchangeable at the beginning of the annual reporting period in which the Amendments are first applied (the initial application date), the entity should translate affected assets, liabilities and equity as required by the Amendments and recognize the differences as of the initial application date as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and/or to the foreign currency translation reserve, as required by the Amendments.
The company is assessing the impact of the new standard, including the effects of the amendments to other accounting standards resulting from the new standard, on the consolidated financial statements.
F-45
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS
| i. | Sapiens |
| a. | Acquisition of Sapiens Software Solutions (Decision) Ltd. minority shares: |
In the first quarter of 2024, Sapiens
acquired the remaining
| b. | Acquisition of NCDC S.A (” NCDC “): |
On December 4, 2023
(the Acquisition date), Sapiens completed the acquisition of
The purchase price amounted to $
During 2024, Sapiens and NCDC’s
former shareholders (“Sellers”) agreed on the final working capital adjustments which resulted in an additional payment of
$
Acquisition-related costs amounted to $
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values allocated to NCDC assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Current assets (including cash acquired of $ | $ | |||
| Customer relations | ||||
| Deferred tax liabilities, net | ( | ) | ||
| Other long-term assets | ||||
| Current liabilities | ( | ) | ||
| Other long-term liabilities | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total assets acquired | $ |
F-46
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
The excess of purchase consideration over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill from the acquisition of NCDC is primarily attributable to potential synergy with Sapiens, as well as certain intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Pro forma results of operations related to this acquisition have not been presented because they are not material to the Company’s consolidated statements of profit or loss.
| ii. | Magic Software |
| a. | Acquisition of Theoris Group Inc. (“Theoris”) |
On April 4, 2024, Magic Software, through
its wholly owned subsidiary, CoreTech Consulting Group LLC, completed the acquisition of all issued and outstanding share capital of Theoris
Group Inc. ("Theoris"). Theoris is a U.S.-based provider of information technology and engineering consulting services, specializing
in strategic data management, analytics, application development, cloud solutions, and the recruitment of technical personnel. Total consideration
amounted to $
The results of operations were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing April 1, 2024. Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. Unaudited pro forma condensed results of operations were not presented since they were not material to the Company’s consolidated statement of profit or loss.
The following table summarizes the provisional estimated fair values allocated to the Theoris acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net assets excluding cash acquired | $ | |||
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | ( | ) | ||
| Total assets acquired net of acquired cash | $ |
F-47
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
| b. | Acquisition of Executive Life Ltd. (“Executive”) |
On October 31, 2024, Magic Software through
its wholly owned subsidiary, CoreTech Consulting Group LLC, completed the acquisition of all issued and outstanding share capital of Executive
Life Ltd. ("Executive"), a U.S.-based executive recruitment firm headquartered in Long Island, New York. Executive specializes
in talent acquisition services across multiple sectors, including construction, information technology, marketing, accounting, finance,
and manufacturing engineering, with a primary geographic focus on New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Texas, and California. Total consideration
amounted to $
This acquisition enhances Magic Software’s capabilities in talent acquisition and expands its consulting and professional service offerings within the U.S. market.
The results of operations of Executive Life Ltd. were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing November 1, 2024. Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. Unaudited pro forma condensed results of operations were not presented since they were not material to the Company’s consolidated statement of profit or loss.
The following table summarizes the provisional estimated fair values allocated to the Executive acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net assets excluding cash acquired | $ | |||
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | ( | ) | ||
| Total assets acquired net of acquired cash | $ |
| c. | Acquisition of nursing care business (“Adam Nursing”) |
On July 3, 2024, Magic Software, through
its subsidiary Minerva Ltd. (“Minerva”), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement to acquire an operating activity of a nursing
care platform business (“Adam Nursing”). The acquisition meets the definition of a business under IFRS 3, and was therefore
accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method. The total consideration paid for the acquisition was $
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the identifiable assets acquired at the acquisition date:
| Customer relationships | $ | |||
| Technology | ||||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total assets acquired net of acquired cash | $ |
F-48
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
| d. | Acquisition of K.M.T. (M.H.) Technologies Communication Computer Ltd. (“KMT”) |
On June 8, 2023, Magic Software acquired
As of the acquisition date, the contingent
consideration was recognized as a financial asset and measured at fair value in the amount of NIS
The results of operations were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing June 30, 2023. Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. Unaudited pro forma condensed results of operations were not presented since they were not material to the Company’s consolidated statement of profit or loss.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities at the date of acquisition:
| Net assets excluding $ | $ | |||
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total assets acquired, net of acquired cash | $ |
| iii. | Matrix |
| a. | Acquisition of Alacer Matrix LLC (“Alacer”) |
On November 13, 2024, Matrix, through
its subsidiary Matrix US Holding LLC, completed the acquisition of
As of the report date, the valuation underlying
the purchase price allocation (PPA) to assets and liabilities has not yet been completed. Accordingly, the allocation is currently provisional,
based on Matrix management’s estimates, and may be updated in subsequent periods following the completion of the valuation. Based
on the provisional allocation, approximately $
F-49
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
The following table summarizes the provisional estimated fair values allocated to the Alacer acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net assets excluding cash acquired | $ | |||
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total assets acquired net of acquired cash | $ |
| b. | Acquisition of Moshe Ort Ltd. (“Ortec”) |
On December 3, 2024, Matrix, through its
subsidiary Matrix IT Integration and Infrastructure, acquired all of Moshe Ort Holdings Ltd., outstanding share capital (Ortec), for approximately
NIS
Ortec imports, distributes, sells, and provides support and specification services for automated manufacturing machines for component assembly and automated inspection machines for assembly processes and components on production lines. Ortec operates in the fields of industrial, medical, and military equipment, lasers and sensors for civilian and defense applications, optical communication systems, and automotive radar systems. Ortec also serves as a representative in Israel for dozens of international manufacturers.
As of the report
date, the valuation underlying the purchase price allocation (PPA) to assets and liabilities has not yet been completed. Accordingly,
the allocation is currently provisional, based on Matrix management’s estimates, and may be updated in subsequent periods following
the completion of the valuation. Based on the provisional allocation, NIS
The following table summarizes the provisional estimated fair values allocated to the Ortech acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net liabilities excluding cash acquired | $ | ( | ) | |
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total assets acquired net of acquired cash | $ |
F-50
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
| iv. | Michpal |
| a. | Liram’s put option |
On February 19, 2024, following the exercise of a put option, Michpal
acquired the remaining
| b. | Acquisition of Heshev Information Systems (2012) Ltd. (“Heshev”) |
On January 1, 2024, Michpal acquired
Michpal and the seller hold mutual call
and put options, respectively, for the remaining
Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. Unaudited pro forma condensed results of operations were not presented since they were not material to the Company’s consolidated statement of profit or loss. Heshev’s results of operations were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing January 1, 2024.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net liabilities excluding cash acquired | $ | ( | ) | |
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total consideration, net of acquired cash | $ |
F-51
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
| c. | Acquisition of Meida Computers Software Solutions (G.D) Ltd. (“Meida”) |
On July 3, 2024, Michpal acquired
As of the acquisition date, the Company did not recognize a liability in respect of the Contingent Consideration, as it assessed that the conditions for payment of the Contingent Consideration would not be met.
Michpal and the seller hold mutual call and put options, respectively,
for the remaining
As of December 31, 2024, the outstanding
financial liability related to the put option, as reported in the statement of financial position, amounts to NIS
Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. Unaudited pro forma condensed results of operations were not presented since they were not material to the Company’s consolidated statement of profit or loss. Meida’s results of operations were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing July 3, 2024.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net liabilities excluding cash acquired | $ | ( | ) | |
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total consideration, net of acquired cash | $ |
| d. | Acquisition of Y-IT Ltd. (“Y-IT”) |
On October 13, 2024,
Michpal acquired
F-52
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
As of the acquisition date, Michpal recognized
a liability for the contingent consideration in the amount of NIS
Additionally, Michpal and seller hold
mutual call and put options, respectively, for the remaining
Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. Unaudited pro forma condensed results of operations were not presented since they were not material to the Company’s consolidated statement of profit or loss. Y-IT’s results of operations were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing October 13, 2024.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net liabilities excluding cash acquired | $ | ( | ) | |
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total consideration, net of acquired cash | $ |
| e. | Acquisition of Paperless Ltd. (“Paperless”) |
On December 24, 2024, Michpal acquired
As of the acquisition
date, Michpal recognized a liability for the contingent consideration in the amount of approximately NIS
F-53
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
Additionally, Michpal and seller hold
mutual call and put options, respectively, for the remaining
Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. Unaudited pro forma condensed results of operations were not presented since they were not material to the Company’s consolidated statement of profit or loss. Paperless’ results of operations were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing December 31, 2024.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net assets excluding cash acquired | $ | |||
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total consideration, net of acquired cash | $ |
| f. | Acquisition of Emalogic Software Ltd. (“Emalogic”) |
On June 22, 2023, Michpal acquired
Michpal and the seller hold mutual call
and put options, respectively, for the remaining
Acquisition-related costs were immaterial. Unaudited pro forma condensed results of operations were not presented since they were not material to the Company’s consolidated statement of profit or loss. Emalogic’s results of operations were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing June 30, 2023.
F-54
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 3:- BUSINESS COMBINATION, SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION AND SALE OF BUSINESS (Cont.)
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, with reference to the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
| Net liabilities excluding cash acquired | $ | ( | ) | |
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | ( | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total consideration, net of acquired cash | $ |
| v. | Formula |
On March 31, 2024 Ofek (a directly held subsidiary) acquired
| Net assets excluding cash acquired | $ | |||
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ||
| Liabilities in respect of business combinations | ( | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interests | ( | ) | ||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Total assets acquired net of acquired cash | $ |
NOTE 4:- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Balance nominated in USD | $ | $ | ||||||
| Balance nominated in NIS | ||||||||
| Balance nominated in other currencies | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
F-55
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 5:- TRADE RECEIVABLES, NET
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Open accounts | $ | $ | ||||||
| Checks receivable | ||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term receivables | ||||||||
| Less - allowance for doubtful accounts(*) | ||||||||
| Trade receivables, net | $ | $ | ||||||
| (*) |
NOTE 6:- PREPAID EXPESNES AND OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVAVABLE
The following table summarizes the composition of the Group’s prepaid expenses and other accounts receivable:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses and advances to suppliers | $ | $ | ||||||
| Government authorities | ||||||||
| Employees | ||||||||
| Related Parties (see Note 17) | ||||||||
| Others | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
Note 7:- long-term investments and receivables
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses and deposits | $ | $ | ||||||
| Investments in financial assets designated at fair value through other comprehensive income | ||||||||
| Trade receivables and unbilled receivables | ||||||||
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | ||||||||
| Dividend preference derivative in TSG (see Note 9) | ||||||||
| Others | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
F-56
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 8:- Fair value measurement
In determining fair value, the Group utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.
The Group’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including accrued interest components, consisted of the following types of instruments as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| Fair value measurements | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||
| Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss | ||||||||||||
| Dividend preference derivative in TSG (1) | ||||||||||||
| Assets in respect of business combinations | ||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Fair value measurements | ||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| Level 3 | Total | |||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Put options of non-controlling interests | $ | $ | ||||||
| Liabilities in respect of business combination | $ | $ | ||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
| Fair value measurements | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||
| Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss | ||||||||||||
| Dividend preference derivative in TSG (1) | ||||||||||||
| Assets in respect of business combinations | ||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Fair value measurements | ||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||
| Level 3 | Total | |||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Put options of non-controlling interests | $ | $ | ||||||
| Liabilities in respect of business combination | $ | $ | ||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
| (1) |
F-57
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 8:- Fair value measurement (Cont.)
The Group believes that the carrying amount of cash, short-term deposits, trade receivables, trade payables, overdrafts and other current liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Changes in financial assets and liabilities classified in Level 3:
| Financial assets measured at fair value | Financial Liabilities measured at fair value | |||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2023: | $ | $ | ||||||
| Increase due to acquisitions | ||||||||
| Fair value measured for the first time | ||||||||
| Change in fair value measurements | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Deduction of the contingent consideration | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | ||||||
| Increase due to acquisitions | $ | $ | ||||||
| Change in fair value measurements | ||||||||
| Deduction of the contingent consideration | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other | ||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | ||||||
F-58
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 9:- Investments in companies accounted for at equity
The following table summarizes the Group’s investments in companies accounted for at equity:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| TSG (Joint venture) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Other Investments accounted for at equity | ||||||||
| Other investments held by subsidiaries | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
Investment in TSG
As of December 31, 2024, the Company holds directly
| a. |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Investments in companies accounted for via equity method | ||||||||
| Shares | $ | $ | ||||||
| Capital note | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
| Long-term investments and receivables | ||||||||
| Dividend preference derivative at fair value through profit or loss | $ | $ | ||||||
| b. |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Opening balance | $ | $ | ||||||
| Increase in fair value recognized in profit or loss | ||||||||
| Currency exchange rate in other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Closing balance | $ | $ | ||||||
F-59
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 9:- Investments in companies accounted for at equity (Cont.)
| c. |
| January 1, 2022 | $ | |||
| Company’s share of loss | ( | ) | ||
| Company’s share of other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements from functional currency to presentation currency | ( | ) | ||
| December 31, 2022 | $ | |||
| Company’s share of profit | ||||
| Company’s share of other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements from functional currency to presentation currency | ( | ) | ||
| December 31, 2023 | $ | |||
| Company’s share of profit | ||||
| Company’s share of other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ||
| Capital gain realized from issuance of shares | ||||
| Capital note conversion | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements from functional currency to presentation currency | ( | ) | ||
| December 31, 2024 | $ |
| d. | Summarized financial data of joint venture or investment: |
| (i) |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Current assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| Non-current assets | ||||||||
| Current liabilities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Non-current liabilities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accumulated cost of share-based payment | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total equity attributed to shareholders | $ | $ | ||||||
| % | % | |||||||
| Share of equity in TSG | ||||||||
| Excess of fair value over carrying amount | ||||||||
| Total investment carrying amount | $ | $ | ||||||
F-60
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 9:- Investments in companies accounted for at equity (Cont.)
| (ii) |
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | |||||||
| Company’s share in TSG | % | % | % | |||||||||
| ( | ) | |||||||||||
| Amortization of excess cost of intangible assets net of tax | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Company’s share of total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | |||||||
| Company’s share of other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Company’s share of profit (loss) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||
Other Investments accounted for via equity
On September 4, 2024, the Company completed the acquisition of a
| e. |
| December 31, | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| Investments in companies accounted for via equity method | ||||
| Shares | $ | |||
F-61
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 9:- INVESTMENTS IN COMPANIES ACCOUNTED FOR AT EQUITY (Cont.)
| f. |
| December 31, 2023 | $ | - | ||
| Acquisition | ||||
| Company’s share of profit | ||||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements from functional currency to presentation currency | ||||
| December 31, 2024 | $ |
| g. | Summarized financial data of joint venture: |
| (iii) |
| December 31, | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| Current assets | $ | |||
| Non-current assets | ||||
| Current liabilities | ( | ) | ||
| Non-current liabilities | ( | ) | ||
| Net assets | $ | |||
| Accumulated cost of share-based payment | ||||
| Total equity attributed to shareholders | $ | |||
| % | ||||
| Share of equity | ||||
| Excess of fair value over carrying amount | ||||
| Total investment carrying amount | $ | |||
F-62
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 9:- Investments in companies accounted for at equity (Cont.)
| (iv) |
| For the period starting September, 4 2024 and ended December 31, | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| Revenues | $ | |||
| Net income (loss) | ||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | |||
| Company’s share | % | |||
| Amortization of excess cost of intangible assets net of tax | ( | ) | ||
| Company’s share of total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | |||
| Company’s share of other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||
| Company’s share of profit (loss) | ||||
| $ | ||||
F-63
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 10:- PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
| a. |
| Computers, furniture and equipment | Leasehold improvements | Motor vehicles | Software | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Measurement period adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Initially consolidated company | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences from translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Measurement period adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Initially consolidated company | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences from translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciated cost as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Computers, furniture and equipment | Leasehold improvements | Motor vehicles | Software | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Initially consolidated company | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences from translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Initially consolidated company | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences from translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31,2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciated cost as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| b. | Depreciation expenses totaled $ |
F-64
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NotE 11:- Intangible Assets, Net
| a. |
| Customer relationship | Capitalized Software costs | Acquired technology | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Measurement period adjustments | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Initially consolidated company | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences from translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Accumulated amortization: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Measurement period adjustments | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences from translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciated cost as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Customer relationship | Capitalized Software costs | Acquired technology | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Initially consolidated company | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences from translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Accumulated amortization: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences from translation of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciated cost as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| b. | Amortization expenses totaled $ |
F-65
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 12:- Goodwill
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Opening balance | $ | $ | ||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Classifications | ( | ) | ||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Closing balance | $ | $ | ||||||
The Group performed annual impairment tests as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 and did not identify any impairment losses (see Note 2(16)). For more information regarding allocation of goodwill to each cash-generating unit see Note 25(b).
The perpetual growth rates and discount rates (corresponding to the weighted average cost of capital – “WACC”) applied for impairment testing purposes in 2024 and 2023 were as follows:
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||
| Pre-tax discount rate | Terminal growth rate | Pre-tax discount rate | Terminal Growth growth rate | |||||||||||||
| Matrix (1) | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
| Sapiens (2) | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
| Magic Software (3) | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
| Other consolidated subsidiaries (4) | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
| (1) |
| (2) |
| (3) |
| (4) |
F-66
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 13:- short term loans from banks and others
December 31, Interest rate | December 31, | |||||||||||
| (%) | Currency | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term loans from banks and others | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Commercial securities not listed | P- | |||||||||||
| Short-term bank loans and credit line | ||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term loans from banks | ||||||||||||
| Accrued interest on long-term loans from banks and others | ||||||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||||||
Note 14:- other accounts payable
Other accounts payable are comprised of the following as of the below dates:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Government institutions | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
Note 15:- Long term loans from Banks and Others
| a. |
| Long-term loans | Current maturities | Long-term loans net of current maturities | Long-term loans net of current maturities | |||||||||||||||
| Interest rate % | Currency | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| b. |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| First year (current maturities) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Second year | ||||||||
| Third year | ||||||||
| Fourth year | ||||||||
| Fifth year and thereafter | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
Details of guarantees and credit facilities are described in Note 21(b)
F-67
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 16:- DEBENTURES
The Group’s liabilities under debentures are attributable to debentures issued by Formula, Sapiens and Matrix. The debentures are all listed for trading on the TASE.
| a. |
| Effective Interest rate | Par value in issuance currency | Par Value | Unamortized debt premium (discount) and issuance costs, net | Current maturities | Total long-term debentures, net of current maturities | Short-term accrued interest | Total short-term and long-term debentures | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| % | Currency | (thousand) | December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Formula’s Series C Secured Debentures (2.29%) | NIS | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Formula’s Series D Secured Debentures (5.68%) | % | NIS | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sapiens’ Series B Debentures (3.37%) | NIS | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Matrix’s Series B Debentures (4.1%) | NIS | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effective Interest rate | Par value in issuance currency | Par Value | Unamortized debt premium (discount) and issuance costs, net | Current maturities | Total long-term debentures, net of current maturities | Short-term accrued interest | Total short-term and long-term debentures | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| % | Currency | (thousand) | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Formula’s Series A Secured Debentures (2.8%) | NIS | $ | $ | $ | $ | - | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Formula’s Series C Secured Debentures (2.29%) | NIS | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sapiens’ Series B Debentures (3.37%) | NIS | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Matrix’s Series B Debentures (4.1%) | NIS | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
During the years
ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Group recorded $
F-68
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 16:- DEBENTURES (Cont.)
| b. |
| Repayment amount | ||||
| 2025 | $ | |||
| 2026 | ||||
| 2027 | ||||
| 2028 | ||||
| 2029 | ||||
| $ | ||||
| c. | Formula’s debentures |
| i) | Formula Systems Series A Secured Debentures |
On September 16,
2015, Formula issued Formula Systems Series A Secured Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
On January 31, 2018,
Formula issued additional Formula Systems Series A Secured Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
The Formula Systems Series A Secured Debentures were listed for trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) from the date of their issuance until their maturity on June 30, 2024.
F-69
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 16:- DEBENTURES (Cont.)
The remaining outstanding Series A
Secured Debentures amounting to NIS
| ii) | Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures |
On March 31, 2019,
Formula issued Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
On April 12, 2021,
Formula issued additional Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
On August 30, 2022,
Formula issued additional Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
The Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures issued in March 2019, together with the Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures sold in April 2021 and in August 2022 in private placements, form one single series with identical terms and conditions.
The Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures are denominated in New Israeli Shekels and are not linked to any currency or index and are non-convertible. The Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures are secured with collateral consisting of shares of Matrix and Sapiens (see Note 21a).
F-70
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 16:- DEBENTURES (Cont.)
The Series C Secured
Debentures are listed for trading on the TASE. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the fair value of Formula’s Series C Secured Debentures,
based on the quoted market price on the TASE, were approximately $
The offerings of Formula’s debentures were made only in Israel and not to U.S. persons (as defined in Rule 902(k) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”)), in an overseas directed offering (as defined in Rule 903(b)(i)(ii) under the Securities Act) and were exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S thereunder.
The sale of Formula’s debentures was not registered under the Securities Act, and Formula’s debentures may not be offered or sold in the United States and/or to U.S. persons without registration under the Securities Act or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
In accordance with the indenture for the Formula Systems Series C Secured Debentures and the Formula Systems Series D Secured Debentures, Formula has undertaken to maintain a number of conditions and limitations on the manner in which it operates its business, including limitations on its ability to undergo a change of control, distribute dividends, incur a floating charge on its assets, or undergo an asset sale or other change that results in a fundamental change in its operations, and to meet certain financial covenants (see Notes 21a and 21c(1)(i)).
| iii) | Formula Systems Series D Secured Debentures |
On September 17 and 19, 2024, Formula issued Formula Systems Series
D Secured Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
The Series D Secured Debentures are denominated in New Israeli Shekels not linked to any currency or index, and are non-convertible. The Formula Systems Series D Secured Debentures are secured with collateral consisting of shares of Matrix and Sapiens (see Note 21a).
The Formula Systems Series D Secured Debentures are listed for trading
on the TASE. As of December 31, 2024 the fair value of Formula’s Series D Secured Debentures, based on the quoted market price on
the TASE, was approximately $
F-71
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 16:- DEBENTURES (Cont.)
| d. | Sapiens’ Series B Debentures |
On September 16,
2017, Sapiens issued its unsecured Series B Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
On June 8, 2020,
Sapiens issued additional Sapiens’ Series B Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
The offerings of Sapiens’ debentures were made only in Israel and not to U.S. persons (as defined in Rule 902(k) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”)), in an overseas directed offering (as defined in Rule 903(b)(i)(ii) under the Securities Act) and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S thereunder.
The sale of Sapiens’ debentures was not registered under the Securities Act, and Sapiens’ debentures may not be offered or sold in the United States and/or to U.S. persons without registration under the Securities Act or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
In accordance with the indenture for the Sapiens Series B Debentures, Sapiens has undertaken to comply with a number of conditions and limitations on the manner in which it operates its business, including limitations on its ability to undergo a change of control, distribute dividends, incur a floating charge on Sapiens’ assets, or undergo an asset sale or other change that results in a fundamental change in Sapiens’ operations and to meet certain financial covenants (see Note 21c(3)(iii)).
F-72
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 16:- DEBENTURES (Cont.)
| e. | Matrix’s Series B Debentures |
On September 18, 2022, Matrix issued the Matrix’s Series B Debentures
in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
February 1st
and August 1st for the period from February 1, 2023 to February 1, 2030. Issuance costs including an early commitment commission
of approximately NIS
On December 4, 2022,
Matrix issued additional Matrix’s Series B Debentures in an aggregate principal amount of NIS
The Matrix’s Series B Debentures issued in September 2022, together with Matrix’s Series B Debentures sold in December 2022 in a private placement, form one single series with identical terms and conditions.
As of December 31,
2024 and 2023, the fair value of Matrix’s Series B Secured Debentures, based on the quoted market price on the TASE, was approximately
$
F-73
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 17:- RELATED PARTies TRANSACTIONS
| a) | Transactions with Asseco and affiliated companies |
During the years
ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, Asseco provided back-office services, professional services and fixed assets to Sapiens’
wholly owned subsidiary, Sapiens Poland, in amounts totaling approximately $
During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, Sapiens Poland
performed services as a sub-contractor on behalf of Asseco for clients of Asseco in total amounts of approximately $
As of December 31,
2024 and 2023 the Group had trade payable balances due from its transactions with Asseco, as detailed above, in amounts of $
| b) | Fees paid for board services in affiliates |
Sapiens paid Formula
director fees for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, of approximately $
Matrix paid Formula
director fees for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, of approximately $
| c) | Compensation of key officers of the Company |
The following amounts disclosed in the table are recognized as an expense during the reporting period related to officers and directors of the Company:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Short-term employee benefits | $ | $ | ||||||
| Share-based compensation | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
| d) | Back-office services |
During the years
ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, Magic Software provided back-office services to Formula in amounts totaling approximately $
| e) | Other Transactions |
The Group’s subsidiaries and affiliates engage from time to time with each other in non-material transactions, in the ordinary course of business, where the amounts involved, and the nature of the transactions, are not material for either of the parties. The Group believes that these transactions are made on an arms’ length basis upon terms and conditions no less favorable to the Group, its subsidiaries and affiliates, as it could obtain from unaffiliated third parties. If the Group engages with its subsidiaries and affiliates in transactions which are not in the ordinary course of business, the Group receives the approvals required under the Companies Law. These approvals include audit committee approval, board approval and, in certain circumstances, shareholder approval.
F-74
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 18:- LEASES
The Group leases substantially
all of its office space and vehicles under operating leases.
Under IFRS 16, all leases with durations greater than 12 months, including non-cancellable operating leases, are now recognized on the statement of financial position. The aggregated present value of lease agreements is recorded as a long-term asset titled operating lease right-of-use assets.
The corresponding lease liabilities are classified between operating lease liabilities which are current and long-term.
Maturity analysis of undiscounted future lease payments receivable for operating leases:
| 2024 | $ | ||||
| 2025 | |||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
| 2028 | |||||
| 2029 and thereafter | |||||
| Total undiscounted cash flows | $ | ||||
| Less imputed interest | ( | ) | |||
| Present value of lease liabilities | $ |
| a. |
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Interest expense on lease liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Total cash outflow for leases | $ | $ | ||||||
F-75
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 18:- LEASES (Cont.)
| b. |
| Land and buildings | Motor vehicles | Total | ||||||||||
| Cost: | ||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Additions during the year: | ||||||||||||
| New leases | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments for indexation | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Modification of leases | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
| Disposals during the year: | ||||||||||||
| Termination of leases | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation: | ||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Additions during the year: | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Disposals during the year: | ||||||||||||
| Termination of leases | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciated cost as of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Land and buildings | Motor vehicles | Total | ||||||||||
| Cost: | ||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Additions during the year: | ||||||||||||
| New leases | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments for indexation | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements of foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Modification of leases | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
| Disposals during the year: | ||||||||||||
| Termination of leases | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation: | ||||||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Additions during the year: | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments arising from translating financial statements of foreign operations | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Disposals during the year: | ||||||||||||
| Termination of leases | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciated cost as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
F-76
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 19:- Employee Option Plans
| a) | Formula and its subsidiaries grant, from time to time, options,
restricted share units or restricted shares to their officers and employees to purchase shares in the respective companies. In general,
the options expire ten years after grant. |
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| b) | Formula: |
In August 2021, the
Company adopted its 2021 Share Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”). Pursuant to the 2021 Plan, the Company may grant from time
to time to its employees, office holders and consultants, options to purchase, share-based awards or restricted shares with respect to,
up to an aggregate of
In March 2022, Formula’s
board of directors, following the approval by Formula’s compensation committee, awarded
In March 2022, Formula’s
board of directors, following the approval by Formula’s compensation committee, awarded employees of the Company
In January 2023, Formula’s board of directors, following the
approval by Formula’s compensation committee, awarded
F-77
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 19:- EMPLOYEE OPTION PLANS (Cont.)
In November
2020, Formula’s board of directors, following the approval by Formula’s compensation committee, awarded its chief
executive officer
The total fair value
of the grant was calculated based on the Formula share price on the grant date and equaled NIS
In the event of termination of Formula’s chief executive officer services agreement with the Company, by the Company for Cause (as defined in the services agreement), the RSUs will immediately terminate and become null and void, and all interests and rights of Formula’s chief executive officer in and to the same will expire. In case of termination of Formula’s chief executive officer services agreement by the Company not for Cause, or due to the resignation of Formula’s chief executive officer for Good Reason (as defined in the grant), all unvested RSUs that could have vested from the grant date until December 31, 2027, assuming all performance and time conditions and future targets would have been fulfilled (including all targets that would have resulted in vesting with respect to any Previous Year which could have still been met in future years), will accelerate and become immediately vested and exercisable, regardless of the actual occurrence or failure to occur of any of the future performance targets relating to those RSUs.
In the event of resignation by Formula’s chief executive officer not for Good Reason (as defined in the grant), Formula’s chief executive officer RSUs will vest, in an accelerated manner, in such portion equal to the pro-rata portion of the Vesting Period that has already lapsed (based on the full number of Fiscal Quarters that have lapsed form January 1, 2020 until the actual resignation date, including notice period). However, any performance-based RSUs for which the applicable target was not achieved up until the resignation date (including the notice period) will expire and terminate.
Total unrecognized
compensation costs related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Formula equity incentive plan as of December
31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $
F-78
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 19:- EMPLOYEE OPTION PLANS (Cont.)
| c) | Matrix: |
In December 2022, Matrix entered into a new employment agreement with
its chief executive officer, Mr. Moti Gutman, for the provision of management services for a term of five years starting on January 1,
2023. As part of the new employment agreement, Matrix awarded Mr. Gutman
On March 12, 2023, Matrix’s board
of directors approved, following the approval by Matrix’s compensation committee, the allocation of
The fair value of the options was estimated
on the date of grant using the Binomial model based on the terms which are: risk-free interest rate is
On August 9, 2023, Matrix’s board
of directors approved, following the approval by Matrix’s compensation committee, the allocation of
On May 15, 2024, Matrix’s board of directors approved, following
the approval by Matrix’s Compensation Committee, the allocation of
The following table summarizes Matrix’s employee share-based compensation activity during the year ended December 31, 2024:
Number of options, RSU and RS | Weighted average exercise price($) | Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) | Aggregate intrinsic value | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding as of January 1, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Expired and forfeited | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercisable as of December 31, 2024 | - | |||||||||||||||
F-79
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 19:- EMPLOYEE OPTION PLANS (Cont.)
The aggregate intrinsic
value provided in the table above represents the total intrinsic value that would have been received by the option holders had all option
holders exercised their options on the respective dates. This value would change based on the change in the market value of Matrix’s
ordinary shares and the change in the exchange rate between the New Israeli Shekel and dollar. Total unrecognized compensation costs related
to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Matrix equity incentive plan as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
were $
| d) | Sapiens: |
The following table summarizes Sapiens’ share-based compensation activity during the year ended December 31, 2024:
Number of options | Weighted average exercise price | Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years) | Aggregate intrinsic value | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding as of January 1, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Expired and forfeited | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Exercised | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercisable as of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
In 2024, 2023 and
2022, Sapiens granted
The options outstanding under Sapiens’ stock option plans as of December 31, 2024 have been separated into ranges of exercise price as follows:
Ranges of exercise price |
Options Outstanding | Weighted Average remaining contractual term | Weighted Average exercise price |
Options Exercisable | Weighted Average exercise price of Options Exercisable | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (Years) | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| 13.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 17.69-20.61 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 21.46-23.12 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 26.71-28.03 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 28.35-32.91 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 38.61 | |||||||||||||||||||||
The total share-based
compensation expense related to all of Sapiens’ equity-based awards, recognized for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and
2022, after being adjusted to comply with IFRS, was $
F-80
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 19:- EMPLOYEE OPTION PLANS (Cont.)
A summary of the RSU activities in Sapiens in the year ended on December 31, 2024, is as follows:
| Weighted Average | ||||||||
| Amount of | Grant-Date Fair | |||||||
| options | value | |||||||
| Unvested as of January 1, 2024 | $ | |||||||
| Granted | ||||||||
| Vested | ( | ) | ||||||
| Expired and forfeiture | ( | ) | ||||||
| Unvested as of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| e) | Magic Software: |
Stock Option Plan of Comm-IT Technology Solutions Ltd (“Comm-IT Solutions”), a subsidiary of Magic Software:
Under the Comm-IT Solutions’ 2022 Stock Option Plan, (“Comm-IT Solutions 2022 Plan”), options may be granted to employees, officers, directors and consultants of Comm-IT Solutions and its subsidiaries. Pursuant to Comm-IT Solutions 2022 Plan, Comm-IT Solutions shall reserve in its registered and reserved capital, such sufficient number of shares (subject to any adjustment in the capital under the Comm-IT Solutions 2022 Plan) required in order to consummate the Comm-IT Solutions 2022 Plan.
In December 2022, Comm-IT Solutions, awarded 12 of its senior officers
In May 2024, Comm-IT
Solutions awarded 116 options to four of its senior officers to purchase 116 shares of Comm-IT Solutions. The options were granted under
the Comm-IT Solutions 2022 Plan, at an exercise price of $
F-81
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 19:- EMPLOYEE OPTION PLANS (Cont.)
A summary of employee option activity under the Comm-IT Solutions 2022 Plan as of December 31, 2024 and changes during the year ended December 31, 2024 are as follows:
| Number of options | Weighted average exercise price | Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) | ||||||||||
| Outstanding as of January 1, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Exercised | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Exercisable as of December 31, 2024 | $ | |||||||||||
As of December 31,
2024, there was $
The options outstanding as of December 31, 2024, have been separated into exercise price categories, as follows:
| Ranges of Exercise price | Options outstanding | Weighted
| Options exercisable | Weighted average exercise price of exercisable options | ||||||||||||||
| $ | (Years) | $ | ||||||||||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 116.83 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1,475.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
| $ | ||||||||||||||||||
Note 20:- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT LIABILITIES
Employee benefits consist of post-employment benefits, other long-term benefits and termination benefits.
| a) | Post-employment benefits: |
According to the labor laws and Severance Pay Law in Israel, the Israeli companies in the Group are required to pay compensation to an employee upon dismissal or retirement or to make current contributions in defined contribution plans pursuant to section 14 of the Severance Pay Law, as specified below. These liabilities are accounted for as a post-employment benefit. The computation of the Group’s employee benefit liability is made according to the current employment contract based on an employee’s salary and employment term which establish the entitlement to receive the compensation.
The post-employment employee benefits are normally financed by contributions classified as a defined contribution plan or as a defined benefit plan, as detailed below.
| 1) | Defined contribution plans: |
Section 14 of the Severance Pay Law, 1963 applies to part of the compensation payments, pursuant to which the fixed contributions paid by the Group into pension funds and/or policies of insurance companies release the Group from any additional liability to employees for whom said contributions were made. These contributions and contributions for benefits represent defined contribution plans.
F-82
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 20:- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
| 2) | Defined benefit plans: |
The Group accounts for that part of the payment of compensation that is not covered by contributions in defined contribution plans, as above, as a defined benefit plan for which an employee benefit liability is recognized and for which the Group deposits amounts in central severance pay funds and in qualifying insurance policies.
| 3) | Other long-term benefits: |
Certain
of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries have a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering certain employees in the U.S. All eligible employees
may elect to contribute up to
| b) |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Defined benefit obligation | $ | $ | ||||||
| Fair value of plan assets | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net defined benefit liability | $ | $ | ||||||
Note 21:- Commitments and Contingencies
| a) | Liens: |
| 1) | Liens have been incurred by Formula over a certain portion of the Matrix’s and Sapiens’ shares which it held. As of December 31, 2024 Formula has collateral in connection with the Series C Secured Debentures and Series D Secured Debentures issued by Formula on the TASE (see Note 16). |
| 2) | Composition of pledged shares of Matrix and Sapiens owned by Formula as of December 31, 2024: |
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| Formula’s Series D Secured Debentures | Formula’s Series C Secured Debentures | |||||||
| Matrix ordinary shares, par value NIS | ||||||||
| Sapiens common shares, par value € | ||||||||
In
August 2022, following the private placement of an additional NIS
In
September 2024, following the private placement of an NIS
During 2023-2024 Michpal pledged the shares of its subsidiaries, Emalogic and Meida (See note 3), as collateral to secure the repayment to an Israeli financial institution.
F-83
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 21:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Cont.)
| b) | Guarantees: |
As of December 31, 2024, the Group
provided performance bank guarantees in an aggregate amount of approximately $
Each of Matrix, Sapiens, Magic Software and Formula provides cross guarantees to its subsidiaries.
| c) | Covenants: |
In connection with the Group’s debentures and credit facility agreements with banks and other financial institutions, as of December 31, 2024, the Group committed to the following:
| 1) | Formula |
| i) | Formula’s Debentures |
In accordance with Formula’s indenture for its Series C and Series D Secured Debentures, Formula has undertaken to comply with the following financial covenants and obligations:
A covenant not to distribute
dividends unless (i) Formula shareholders’ equity attributable to Formula Systems shareholders is at least $
Financial covenants, including: (i) the equity attributable to Formula
Systems shareholders, as reported in Formula’s annual or quarterly financial statements, shall not be less than $
F-84
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 21:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Cont.)
| a. | Standard events of default, including, among others: |
| 1. | Suspension of trading of the debentures on the TASE over a period of 60 days; |
| 2. | If the rating of the debentures is less than BBB- by Standard and Poors Maalot or equivalent rating of other rating agencies; |
| 3. | Failure to have the debentures rated over a period of 60 days; |
| 4. | If there is a change in control without consent of the rating agency; and |
| 5. | If Formula fails to continue to control any of its subsidiaries; |
| 2) | Matrix |
| A. | In the context of Matrix’s engagements with banks and financial institutions for its credit facilities, Matrix has undertaken to comply with the following financial covenants, as they are expressed in its financial statements: |
| (i) | The total rate of Matrix’s financial debts and liabilities
to banks with the addition of debts in respect of debentures that have been and/or will be issued by Matrix and shareholders’ loans
that have been and/or will be granted to Matrix (collectively, the “debts”) will not exceed |
| (ii) | The ratio of Matrix’s net debt to the annual EBITDA
will not exceed |
| (iii) | Matrix’s equity shall not be lower than NIS |
| (iv) | Matrix’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term bank
deposits shall not be less than NIS |
| (v) | Matrix has committed that the rate of ownership and control of Matrix-Systems Ltd. shall never be below 50.1%. |
| (vi) | Matrix will not create any pledge on all or part of its property and assets in favor of any third party and will not provide any guarantee to secure any third party’s debts as they are today and as they will be without the banks’ consent (except for a first-rate fixed pledge on an asset which acquisition will be financed by a third party and which the pledge will be in his favor). |
| (vii) | Matrix will not sell and/or transfer all or part of its assets to others in any manner whatsoever without the banks’ advance written consent unless it is done in the ordinary course of business. |
F-85
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 21:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Cont.)
| B. | Matrix Series B Debentures: |
In accordance with Matrix’s indenture for its Series B Debentures, Matrix has undertaken to comply with the following financial covenants and obligations:
| (i) | Matrix shareholders’ total equity (all based on Matrix’s
quarterly or annual consolidated financial statements, and as defined on Matrix Series B Debentures deed of trust) shall not be less
than NIS |
| (ii) | Matrix’s net financial indebtedness (all based on Matrix’s quarterly or annual consolidated
financial statements, and as defined on Matrix Series B Debentures deed of trust) shall not exceed |
| (iii) | The ratio of Matrix’s net financial indebtedness (as defined on Matrix Series B Debentures deed
of trust) to the last twelve-months period EBITDA (as defined on Matrix Series B Debentures deed of trust) will not exceed 5 (all based
on Matrix’s quarterly and annual consolidated financial statements). As of December 31, 2024 the ratio of Matrix’s net financial
indebtedness to EBITDA (all based on Matrix’s 2024 annual consolidated financial statements, and as defined on Matrix Series B Debentures
deed of trust) was |
| 3) | Sapiens |
In accordance with the indenture for Sapiens’ Series B Debentures, Sapiens has undertaken to maintain a number of conditions and limitations on the manner in which it can operate its business, including limitations on its ability to undergo a change of control, distribute dividends, incur a floating charge on its assets, or undergo an asset sale or other change that results in fundamental change in its operations. Sapiens Series B Debentures deed of trust also requires it to comply with certain financial covenants, as described below. A breach of the financial covenants for more than two successive quarters or a substantial downgrade in the rating of the debentures (below BBB-) could result in the acceleration of Sapiens’ obligation to repay the debentures. The deed of trust includes the following provisions:
| (i) | a negative pledge, subject to certain exceptions. |
| (ii) | financial covenants, including: (a) Sapiens shareholders’
equity , as reported in its annual or quarterly financial statements, will not be less than $ |
F-86
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 21:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Cont.)
| (iii) | a covenant not to distribute dividends unless (a) Sapiens
shareholders’ equity shall not be less than $ |
| 4) | Magic Software |
Under the terms of the loans with an Israeli financial institution, Magic Software has undertaken to comply with the following financial covenants, as they will be expressed in its consolidated financial statements:
| (i) | Magic Software’ equity will not be lower than $ |
| (ii) | The ratio of Magic Software’ total financial debts less
cash to total assets will not exceed |
| (iii) | The ratio of Magic Software’s total financial debts
less cash, short-term deposits and short-term marketable securities to operating income will not exceed |
| 5) | Michpal |
Under the terms of the loans with an Israeli financial institution, Michpal has undertaken to comply with financial covenants.
As of December 31, 2024, each of Formula, Matrix, Sapiens, Magic Software and Michpal complied with all of its financial covenants.
| d) | Legal proceedings: |
| 1) | On November 23, 2020, Olir Trade
and Industries Ltd. (“Olir”) filed a derivative action and a motion to certify a derivative action, with the District Court
(Economic Division) of Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel (Derivative Action No. 58348-11-20) (the “Claim” and the “Motion to Certify”,
respectively) (as reported in the Company’s Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 9, 2020). In the framework of the Motion to Certify, Olir requested permission to file the Claim, on the Company’s
behalf, against each of the Company’s five directors, as well as the Company’s chief executive officer (the “CEO”),
Mr. Guy Bernstein, and chief financial officer, Mr. Asaf Berenstin (the “CFO”), as defendants. The Company and the named defendants
are all listed as respondents to the Motion to Certify. The Claim challenges the legality, under the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999
(the “Companies Law”), of compensation awarded to the Company’s CEO and CFO, including past engagements with the CEO
and the recent re-approval by the Company’s compensation committee and board of directors (as reported in the Company’s Report
of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2020), of the eight-year equity-based
award of compensation—in the form of |
F-87
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 21:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Cont.)
On January 24, 2023, the Company
submitted a request for dismissal in limine of the motion to certify due to a change in the factual grounds of the motion including, among
other things, the reapproval of the compensation given to the CEO by a new and independent board of directors made on January 15, 2023.
The court asked the other parties to respond to the request for dismissal by March 1,2023. A cross examinations hearing was held on January
31, 2023. On March 1, 2023, the other respondents to the motion to certify submitted their responses to the request for dismissal in which
they supported the request. On March 8, 2023, Olir filed its objection to the dismissal in limine. On April 13, 2023 the Company submitted
its response to Olir’s response. On September 18, 2023 Olir filed its briefs. On December 3, 2023, the Company filed a motion to
render a decision in the motion to dismiss in limine. On December 5, 2023 the court granted the Company with a motion to dismiss in limine,
and ordered the Company to pay Olir’s costs in the amount of NIS
| 2) | On December 24, 2019, a motion
for the approval of a class action (#60508-02-20), in an amount of NIS |
F-88
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 21:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Cont.)
| 3) | On December 30, 2021, Ronen Har Even, Galit Har Even and TV Center
Ltd. (the “Plaintiffs”) submitted a monetary claim in the sum of NIS |
In
November 2023, N.Z. Marketing and Advertising Ltd (“Safra”), a subsidiary of ZAP Group, was added as defendant to a lawsuit
filed by the estate of the deceased Klil Kimchi, who died in an accident in a swimming pool in a private house during a social event organized
by Safra and another company. The deceased was invited as a guest of the other company. The total claim is for an amount of NIS
On December 3, 2023, our subsidiary Matrix received a request for disclosure of materials pursuant to Section 198a of the Companies Law, which was submitted to the District Court (Economic Division) of Tel Aviv-Jaffa by an individual who claimed to be a shareholder of Matrix. The request related to a potential derivative claim that could be filed by the individual, on Matrix’s behalf, against Matrix’s chief executive officer and each of its directors related to the procedure for the approval of compensation awarded to Matrix’s chief executive officer following the rejection of such compensation by Matrix’s general meeting of shareholders and the re-approval of that compensation by Matrix’s compensation committee and board of directors, respectively, acting in accordance with the Companies Law. On April 18, 2024, Matrix filed a response to the disclosure request in which Matrix requested that the court deny, on various grounds, the request made by the potential plaintiff. An inquest was held on the disclosure motion on February 2, 2025. At this stage of this legal proceeding the Company cannot predict its outcome.
F-89
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 21:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Cont.)
| 4) | In addition to the above-described legal proceedings, from time to time, Formula and/or its Investees are subject to legal, administrative and regulatory proceedings, claims, demands and investigations in the ordinary course of business, including claims with respect to intellectual property, contracts, employment and other matters. |
The Group accrues a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in the determination of both the probability and as to whether a loss is reasonably estimable. These accruals are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter. The Group intends to defend itself vigorously against the above claims, and it generally intends to vigorously defend any other legal claims to which it is subject. While for most litigations, the outcome is difficult to determine, to the extent that there is a reasonable possibility that the losses to which the Group may be subject could exceed the amounts (if any) that it has already accrued, the Group attempts to estimate such additional loss, if reasonably possible, and disclose it (or, if it is an immaterial amount, indicate accordingly). The aggregate provision that the Group has recorded for all other legal proceedings (other than the particular material proceedings described above) is not material.
| e) | Royalty commitments: |
Sapiens Technologies
(1982) Ltd. (“Sapiens Technologies”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Sapiens incorporated in Israel, was partially financed
under programs sponsored by the Israel Innovation Authority (“IIA”) for the support of certain research and development activities
conducted in Israel. In exchange for participation in the programs by the IIA, Sapiens Technologies agreed to pay
As of December 31,
2024, the total remaining unpaid royalties to the IIA amounted to $
| f) | Insurance: |
The Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates insure themselves in bodily injury and property damage insurance policies, including third party, professional liability and employer’s liability insurance policies. Formula, Sapiens, Magic Software, ZAP Group, Insync, Michpal, Shamrad ,Ofek and Hashahar directors and officers (D&O) are insured under an “umbrella” policy for insurance of directors and officers including D&O side A DIC policy (another layer of protection for officers) acquired by the Company for itself and its subsidiaries, for a period of 12 months from February 14, 2024.
F-90
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 22:- equity
The composition of the Company’s share capital is as follows:
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorized | Issued | Outstanding | Authorized | Issued | Outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary shares, NIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| a. | Formula’s ordinary shares, par value NIS |
| b. | Formula holds |
| c. | In February 2021, Formula declared a cash dividend of approximately
NIS |
| d. | In August 2021, Formula declared a cash dividend of approximately
NIS |
| e. | In March 2022, Formula declared a cash dividend of approximately
NIS |
| f. | In November 2022, Formula declared a cash dividend of approximately
NIS |
| g. | In May 2023, Formula declared a cash dividend of approximately
NIS |
| h. | In March 2024, Formula declared a cash dividend of approximately
NIS |
| i. | In August 2024, Formula declared a cash dividend of approximately NIS
|
F-91
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 22:- equity (Cont.)
| j. | For information concerning Formula’s employees and officers share-based plans, see Note 19. |
| k. | See Note 26 about subsequent events. |
Note 23:- TAXES ON INCOME
| a. | Israeli taxation: |
| 1) | Corporate tax rate in Israel: |
Taxable income of
Israeli companies was generally subject to corporate tax at the rate of
| 2) | Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (the “Law”): |
Amendment 73 to the Law:
In December 2016, the Economic Efficiency
Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget Years) 2016, which includes Amendment 73 to
the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments (the “2017 Amendment”) was published and was pending the publication
of regulations, in May 2017 regulations were promulgated by the Finance Ministry to implement the “Nexus Principles” based
on OECD guidelines published as part of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project. Following the publication of the regulations,
the 2017 Amendment became fully effective.
Starting from 2017 under Amendment 73 to the Investment Law, part of the Group’s taxable income in Israel is entitled to a preferred 12% tax rate. Since 2019, under SPTE the tax rate for part of the Group’s taxable income in Israel has been reduced to a 6% corporate tax rate.
Amendment 74 to the Encouragement Law:
On November 15, 2021, the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Achieving
Budget Targets for the 2021 and 2022 Budget Years), 2021 (the “Economic Efficiency Law”), was enacted. This Law establishes a temporary order allowing Israeli companies to release tax-exempt earnings (“trapped earnings” or “accumulated earnings”) accumulated until December 31, 2020, through a mechanism established for a reduced corporate income tax rate applicable to those earnings (the “Temporary Order”).
F-92
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 23:- TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
In addition to the
reduced corporate income tax (CIT) rate, Article 74 to the Encouragement Law was amended whereby effective from August 15, 2021, for any
dividend distribution (including a dividend as per Article 51B to the Encouragement Law) by a company which has trapped earnings, there
will be a requirement to allocate a portion of that distribution to the trapped earnings.
The tax-exempt income is attributable to certain Group members’ previous status as “Approved Enterprise” and “Benefited
Enterprise”. Such tax-exempt income cannot be distributed to shareholders without subjecting the Company to payable income taxes.
If dividends are distributed from previous tax-exempt profits, the Company will be liable for income tax at the rate applicable to its
profits from the Approved Enterprise in at the tax rate enacted in the year in which the income was earned.
According to the Temporary Order, the reduction of CIT will apply to earnings that are released (with no requirement for an actual distribution)
within a period of one year from the date of enactment of the Temporary Order. The reduction in the CIT is dependent on the proportion
of the trapped earnings that are released in relation to the total trapped earnings, and on the applicable CIT rate in the years the earnings
were generated. Consequently, the larger the proportion of the trapped earnings that are released, the lower the tax in respect of the
distribution. The minimum tax rate is
In 2021, Sapiens
elected to benefit from the Temporary Order and pay the reduced CIT as per the provisions of the Economic Efficiency Law in respect
of its total accumulated tax-exempt earnings amounting to NIS
As a result, as of December 31, 2022 all of Sapiens’ and Magic Software’s trapped earnings were released.
| 3) | Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969: |
The Group’s
management believes that certain of its Israeli operations currently qualify as Industrial Companies within the meaning of the Law for
the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 5729-1969 (the “Industrial Encouragement Law”). Pursuant to the Industry Encouragement
Law, a company qualifies as an Industrial
Company if it is an Israeli resident company which was incorporated in Israel and at least
F-93
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 23:- TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
An Industrial Company is entitled to certain corporate tax benefits, including:
| i. | Amortization of the cost of purchased patents, or the right to use a patent or know-how or certain other intangible property rights (other than goodwill) that were purchased in good faith and are used for the development or promotion of the Industrial Enterprise, over an eight-year period commencing on the year in which such rights were first exercised; |
| ii. | The right to elect, under certain conditions, to file a consolidated tax return together with Israeli Industrial Companies controlled by it; and |
| iii. | Expenses related to a public offering are deductible in equal amounts over three years beginning from the offering year. |
Eligibility for the benefits under the Industrial Encouragement Law is not subject to receipt of prior approval from any governmental authority. The Group cannot assure you that the aforementioned subsidiaries will continue to qualify as Industrial Companies or that the benefits described above will be available in the future.
| 4) | Foreign Exchange Regulations: |
Under the Foreign Exchange Regulations, certain Israeli subsidiaries of the Group calculate their tax liability in dollars according to certain orders. The tax liability, as calculated in dollars, is translated into NIS according to the exchange rate as of December 31 of each year for tax purposes only.
| 5) | Structural changes in Matrix and ZAP Group: |
During the fourth quarter of 2022, Matrix
made a structural change with respect to its holdings in some of its U.S. based subsidiaries. Prior to the structural change, Matrix held,
indirectly through subsidiaries, all of the share interest in Matrix IFS and Network Infrastructure Technologies Inc. and
In May 2022, a tax ruling was signed determining that as part of a merger process, one subsidiary of Zap Group will transfer all their assets and liabilities subject to the provisions of section 103 of the Income Tax Ordinance.
F-94
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 23:- TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
| b. | Non-Israeli subsidiaries: |
Non-Israeli subsidiaries are taxed according to the tax laws in their respective countries of residence. Deferred income taxes were provided in relation to undistributed earnings of non-Israeli subsidiaries, which the Group intends to distribute in the near future.
The Group intends to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings in the foreign subsidiaries in which earnings arose, in the vast majority of its subsidiaries. If the earnings, for which deferred taxes were not provided, were distributed in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Group would be subject to additional Israeli income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and non-Israeli withholding taxes.
The amount of undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are considered to be reinvested as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $
The amount of cash
and cash equivalents held by the Group’s non-Israeli subsidiaries and would have been subject to income taxes if distributed as
dividend as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $
| c. | Tax Reform - United States of America |
The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) was approved on December 22, 2017. This legislation makes significant changes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Such changes include a reduction in the corporate tax rate and limitations on certain corporate deductions and credits, among other changes.
Starting from 2022, the TCJA requires taxpayers to capitalize research and development expenses with amortization periods over five years for research activities conducted in the United States and over fifteen years for research activities conducted outside of the United States, which has increased the Group’s tax liability in the U.S.
| d. | Net operating loss carried forward: |
As of December 31, 2024, Formula and
its subsidiaries have cumulative losses for tax purposes totaling approximately $
F-95
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 23:- TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
| 1) | Formula |
As of December 31, 2024, Formula stand-alone
had cumulative carry forward tax losses in Israel totaling approximately NIS
| 2) | Matrix |
As of December 31,
2024, certain subsidiaries of Matrix had operating carry-forward tax losses totaling approximately NIS
| 3) | Magic Software |
As of December 31, 2024, certain subsidiaries
of Magic Software had operating carry forward tax losses totaling approximately $
| 4) | Sapiens |
As of December 31,
2024, certain subsidiaries of Sapiens had carry-forward tax losses totaling approximately $
| 5) | ZAP Group |
As of December 31, 2024, ZAP Group and certain of its subsidiaries
had carry-forward tax losses totaling approximately NIS
| 6) | Michpal |
As of December 31, 2024, two subsidiaries
of Michpal had carry-forward tax losses totaling approximately $
| 7) | As of December 31, 2024 Insync, Ofek, Shamrad and Hashahar did not have any carry forward tax losses. |
| e. | Income tax assessments: |
Formula and its subsidiaries are routinely examined by various tax authorities. Below is a summary of the income tax assessments of Formula and its subsidiaries:
| 1) | Formula |
Formula has received final tax assessments (or assessments that are deemed final) through the tax year 2017.
| 2) | Matrix |
F-96
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 23:- TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
| 3) | Magic Software |
Magic Software and part of its Israeli subsidiaries have received final tax assessments through the year 2019.
| 4) | Sapiens |
| 5) | ZAP Group |
ZAP Group and its subsidiaries have received final tax assessments (or assessments that are deemed final) through the tax year 2021.
| 6) | Other than those aforementioned subsidiaries, all other Formula’s subsidiaries have received final tax assessments (or assessments that are deemed final) through the tax year 2018. |
| f. | Deferred tax liabilities, net: |
| 1) |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
| 2) |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Net operating losses carried forward | $ | $ | ||||||
| Intangible assets, fixed asset and right-of-use assets | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Lease liabilities | ||||||||
| Differences in measurement basis (cash basis for tax purposes) | ||||||||
| Other | ||||||||
| $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
| g. |
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Domestic (Israel) | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Foreign | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
F-97
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 23:- TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
| h. | Income tax (tax benefit) consists of the following: |
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Current taxes | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| i. | Theoretical tax: |
The following table presents reconciliation between the theoretical tax expense, assuming that all income was taxed at statutory tax rates, and the actual income tax expense, as recorded in the Group’s consolidated statements of profit or loss:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Income before income taxes, as per the statement of operations | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Statutory tax rate in Israel | % | % | % | |||||||||
| Tax computed at the statutory tax rate | ||||||||||||
| Non-deductible expenses (non-taxable income) net and tax-deductible costs not included in the accounting costs | ||||||||||||
| Effect of different tax rates | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Release of trapped earnings (see Note 23(a)(2)) | ||||||||||||
| Effect of “Approved, Beneficiary or Preferred Enterprise” status | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Deferred taxes on current losses (utilization of carry forward losses) and temporary differences for which a valuation allowance was provided, net | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Undistributed earnings | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Taxes in respect of prior years | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Uncertain tax positions | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Other | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Taxes on income | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| j. | Uncertain tax positions: |
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of total unrecognized tax benefits in Formula’s subsidiaries is as follows:
| Balance as of January 1, 2023 | $ | |||
| Decrease in tax positions | ( | ) | ||
| Increase in tax positions | ||||
| Statue limitation | ( | ) | ||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | |||
| Decrease in tax positions | ( | ) | ||
| Increase in tax positions | ||||
| Statue limitation | ( | ) | ||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ |
F-98
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 23:- TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
Although the Group believes that it has adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to tax audits and settlement, there is no assurance that the final tax outcome of its tax audits will not be different from that which is reflected in the Group’s income tax provisions. Such differences could have a material effect on the Group’s income tax provision, cash flow from operating activities and net income in the period in which such determination is made.
The entire balance of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would reduce the Group’s annual effective tax rate.
Note 24:- Supplementary Financial StatementS Information
| a. |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Matrix and its subsidiaries | $ | $ | ||||||
| Sapiens and its subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Magic Software and its subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Other | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
b.(1)
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Proprietary software and related services | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Other products and third party | ||||||||||||
| Services | ||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
b.(2)
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Products and services transferred over time | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Products transferred at a point in time | ||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
F-99
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 24:- Supplementary Financial StatementS Information (Cont.)
| c. |
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Wages and related expenses | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||
| Subcontractors | ||||||||||||
| Advertising | ||||||||||||
| Maintenance and other expenses | ||||||||||||
| Total Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| d. |
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Financial expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Financial expenses related to liabilities in respect of business combinations | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Interest expenses on loans and borrowings | ||||||||||||
| Financial costs related to Debentures | ||||||||||||
| Interest expenses attributed to IFRS 16 | ||||||||||||
| Derivatives loss | ||||||||||||
| Bank charges, negative foreign exchange differences and other financial expenses | ||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Financial income: | ||||||||||||
| PPP loan forgiveness | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Interest income from deposits, positive foreign exchange differences and other financial income | ||||||||||||
| Financial expenses, net | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
F-100
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 24:- Supplementary Financial StatementS Information (Cont.)
| e. | Geographical information: |
| 1) |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Israel | $ | $ | ||||||
| United States | ||||||||
| Europe | ||||||||
| Japan | ||||||||
| Other | ||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||
| 2) | Revenues: |
The Group’s revenues classified by geographic area (based on the location of customers) are as follows:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Israel | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| International: | ||||||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Europe | ||||||||||||
| Africa | ||||||||||||
| Japan | ||||||||||||
| Other (mainly Asia pacific) | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
See Note 2(11) regarding the transaction prices allocated to performance obligation.
F-101
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 24:- Supplementary Financial StatementS Information (Cont.)
| f. | Earnings per share: |
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share for the Group:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Numerator: | ||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per share – net income attributable to equity holders of the Company | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Diluted earnings per share – net income attributable to equity holders of the Company | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Denominator: | ||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per share – weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities | ||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per share – adjusted weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||||||
| Basic net earnings per share | ||||||||||||
| Diluted net earnings per share | ||||||||||||
Note 25:- operating segments
| a. | General: |
The Group is engaged through eight directly held subsidiaries— Matrix; Sapiens; Magic Software; Michpal; ZAP Group; Insync; Ofek and Shamrad; and one jointly controlled entity: TSG— in providing software services, proprietary and non-proprietary software solutions, software product marketing and support, computer infrastructure and integration solutions and training and integration.
Matrix
Matrix IT Ltd. is Israel’s leading IT services company. Matrix provides software solutions and services, software development projects, outsourcing, integration of software systems and services, project management services and comprehensive consulting and management services in complex infrastructure projects, urban and environment planning – all in accordance with its customers’ specific needs. Matrix also provides upgrading and expansion of existing software systems.
Matrix operates through its directly and indirectly held subsidiaries in the following segments: (1) Information Technology (IT) solutions and services, Consulting & Management in Israel; (2) Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services in the U.S.; (3) Cloud and Computing infrastructure; and (4) Sales marketing and support of software products.
Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services, Consulting & Management in Israel:
The software solutions
and services in Israel provided by Matrix consist mainly of providing tailored software solutions and upgrading and expanding mainly
existing large-scale software systems. These services include, among others, developing customized software, adapting software to the
customer’s specific needs, implementing software and modifying it based on the customer’s needs, outsourcing, software project
management, software testing and QA and integrating all or part of the above elements. Furthermore, the activity in this segment includes
project management consulting services and multi-disciplinary operational and engineering consulting services, including supervision
of complex engineering projects, all according to client specific needs as the scope of work invested in each element varies from one
customer to the other. Starting from the financial statements for the year 2024, Matrix presents its training and implementation operations
— which were previously reported as a separate operating segment and represented approximately
F-102
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
Note 25:- operating segments (Cont.)
Information Technologies (IT) solutions and services in the United States:
Matrix’s activities in this segment are performed by two lines
of business – Matrix US Holdings and Xtivia. The two line of business primarily provide software solutions and services of Governance
Risk and Compliance (“GRC”) experts, including activities on the following topics: risk management, management and fraud prevention,
anti-money laundering, trade surveillance as well as, specialized advisory services in the area of compliance with financial regulation
and operational services, as well as solutions and specialized technological services in areas such as: portals, BI (Business Intelligence),
DBA (Data Base Administration), CRM (Customer Relation Management) and EIM (Enterprise Information Management). Furthermore, the activity
in this segment includes dedicated solutions for the GovCon Government contracting market, IT help desk services specializing in healthcare
and software product distribution services particularly IBM, BMC and Atlassian products to customers in the public-government sector in
the U.S. In 2024, the activity in the U.S. accounted for approximately
Cloud and computing infrastructure:
Matrix’s activities
in this segment, is primarily providing computer solutions to computer and communications infrastructures, marketing and sale of computers
and peripheral equipment to business customers, providing related services, and cloud computing solutions (through
the business specializing unit of the Company - Cloud Zone) and a myriad of services and products regarding office automation and printing
solutions, representation of global leading manufacturers of test and measurement equipment, communication and cyber and RF solutions,
projects and integration in the field of automation, calibration services in advanced technologies, provision of industrial video and
image processing solutions as well as Database services and Big data services (through the specialized business unit Data zone). In 2024,
activity in computer and cloud infrastructure and integration solutions accounted for approximately
Sales marketing and support of Software product:
Matrix’s activities
in this segment include marketing, distributing and support for various software products, web world content management, database and
data warehouse mining, application integration, database and systems, data management and software development tools. In 2024, activity
in software product marketing and support accounted for approximately
Sapiens
Sapiens is a leading global provider of software solutions for the insurance industry. Sapiens’ extensive expertise is reflected in its innovative software, solutions and professional services for property & casualty (P&C); reinsurance; life, pension & annuity (L&A); workers’ compensation (WC); medical professional liability (MPL); financial & compliance (F&C); and decision modelling for both insurance and financial markets. Sapiens offers end-to-end solutions for insurers core systems, as well as complementary data & analytics and digital. Importantly its wide array of professional services ensures that Sapiens not only makes a sale but accompanies and guides its customers on their path to digital transformation and brings important insights from the field into its products roadmap. Sapiens’ offerings not only enable its customers to effectively manage their core business functions – including policy administration, claims and billing – they support insurers on their path to digital transformation. Its portfolio also provides a variety of complimentary solutions for critical requirements such as reinsurance management, underwriting management, illustration software, electronic applications and financial compliance tools. The latest versions of its platforms possess modern, modular cloud-first architecture and are digital-driven, providing full coverage for all business aspects of policy management, digital engagement and data analysis. They empower customers to respond to the rapidly changing insurance market and frequent regulatory changes, while improving the efficiency of their core operations.
F-103
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 25:- OPERATING SEGMENTS (Cont.)
Magic Software
Magic Software is a global provider of: (i) software services and Information Technologies (“IT”) outsourcing software services; (ii) proprietary application development and business process integration platforms; (iii) selected packaged vertical software solutions; as well as (iv) cloud-based services for end to end digital transformation. Magic Software’s technology is used by customers to develop, deploy and integrate on-premises, mobile and cloud-based business applications quickly and cost effectively. In addition, Magic Software’s technology enables enterprises to accelerate the process of delivering business solutions that meet current and future needs and allow customers to dramatically improve their business performance and return on investment.
With respect to software services and IT outsourcing services, Magic Software offers a vast portfolio of professional services in the areas of infrastructure design and delivery, application development, technology consulting planning and implementation services, integration projects, project management, software testing and quality assurance, engineering consulting (including supervision of engineering projects), support services, cloud computing for deployment of highly available and massively-scalable applications and API’s and supplemental outsourcing services, all according to the specific needs of the customer, and in accordance with the professional expertise required in each case.
In addition, Magic Software offers a variety of proprietary comprehensive packaged software solutions through certain of its subsidiaries for (i) enterprise-wide and fully integrated medical platform (“Clicks”), specializing in the design and management of patient-file oriented software solutions for managed care and large-scale health care providers. This platform aims to allow providers to securely access an individual’s electronic health record at the point of care, and it organizes and proactively delivers information with potentially real time feedback to meet the specific needs of physicians, nurses, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, front-and back-office professionals and consumers; (ii) enterprise management systems for both hubs and traditional air cargo ground handling operations from physical handling and cargo documentation through customs, seamless electronic data interchange, or EDI communications, dangerous goods, special handling, track and trace, security to billing (“Hermes”); (iii) enterprise human capital management, or HCM, solutions, to facilitate the collection, analysis and interpretation of quality data about people, their jobs and their performance, to enhance HCM decision making (“HR Pulse”); (iv) revenue management and monetization solutions in mobile, wireline, broadband and mobile virtual network operator/enabler, or MVNO/E (“Leap”); (v) comprehensive systems for managing broadcast channels in the area of TV broadcast management through cloud-based on-demand service or on-premise solutions; (vi) comprehensive solution for sales and distribution field activities, such as order taking, route accounting, trade marketing, retail execution, proof of deliveries and B2B E-commerce (“Mobisale”); and (vii) comprehensive solution for efficient management of all types of rehabilitation centers (“Nativ”).
F-104
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 25:- OPERATING SEGMENTS (Cont.)
Magic Software solutions are used by customers to develop, deploy and integrate on-premises, mobile and cloud-based business applications quickly and cost effectively. In addition, its technology enables enterprises to accelerate the process of delivering business solutions that meet current and future needs and allow customers to dramatically improve their business performance and return on investment. Its software solutions include application platforms for developing and deploying specialized and high-end large-scale business applications (Magic xpa application platform, formerly branded uniPaaS, Appbuilder and Magic SmartUX), an integration platform that allows the integration and interoperability of diverse solutions, applications and systems in a quick and efficient manner (Magic xpi business and process integration platform, formerly branded iBOLT), Magic BusinessEye – a cloud-based platform for all verticals enabling smooth end-to-end digital transformation and full organizational business intelligence and FactoryEye - a proprietary high performance, low-code, flexible, hybrid platform for manufacturers based on existing infrastructure enabling real-time virtualizations of all production data and advanced analytics (based on machine learning) for improved productivity and competitive advantage. These solutions enable Magic Software customers to improve their business performance and return on investment by supporting the affordable and rapid delivery and integration of business applications, systems and databases.
Magic Software products and services are available through a global network of regional offices, independent software vendors, system integrators, distributors and value-added resellers as well as original equipment manufacturers and consulting partners in approximately 50 countries.
Insync
Insync is a U.S. based national supplier of employees to Vendor Management Systems (VMS) Workforce Management Program accounts. Insync specializes in providing professionals in the following areas; Accounting and Finance, Administrative, Customer Service, Clinical, Scientific and Healthcare, Engineering, Manufacturing and Operations, Human Resources, IT Technology, LI/MFG, and Marketing and Sales. Insync currently supports more than 30 VMS program customers with employees in over 40 states.
Michpal
Michpal, an Israeli registered company, is a developer of proprietary,
on-premises payroll software solution for processing traditional payroll stubs to Israeli enterprises and payroll service providers. Michpal
also developed several complementary modules such as attendance reporting, which are sold to its customers for additional fees. Together
with its subsidiaries Unique Software Industries Ltd, a software development and services company, providing integrated solutions in the
field of payroll for more than
ZAP Group
ZAP Group, is Israel’s largest group of consumer websites which manages more than twenty leading consumer websites from diverse content worlds with a total of more than 17 million visits per month, including Zap Price Comparison website, Zap Yellow Pages (the largest business index in Israel) and Zap Rest (Israel’s restaurants index). ZAP Group, an Israeli private company, provides a variety of digital advertising solutions for its customers (small and medium businesses in Israel) and an access to an E-commerce platform to allow them to engage with their consumers. ZAP Group serves over 400,000 listed businesses on its platforms; approximately 16,000 of them are paying customers. The websites managed and offered by ZAP Group offer consumers a user-friendly search experience with a variety of advanced tools, which enable them to make educated purchase decisions in the best and most informed way.
F-105
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 25:- OPERATING SEGMENTS (Cont.)
Digital Solutions
ZAP Group provides a variety of digital advertising solutions for its customers (small and medium businesses in Israel) and an access to an E-commerce platform that allows them to engage with their consumers. ZAP Group regularly seeks to develop attractive digital solutions, which it believes to have market potential for small and medium businesses and their end user. All of ZAP Group’s investments in this area have been proven, where we believe we can leverage our experience to enhance product positioning and increase market penetration. We provide our management and technical and financial expertise, and marketing experience to help bring these products to market.
E-commerce Solutions
In 2021, ZAP Group launched a new website for car sellers and buyers, which provides a marketplace where buyers can explore on one website various options for buying a second-hand car (B2C). The platform allows the buyer to compare prices, specs, financing, peripheral services, accessories and overall packages. The Online, real-time supply availability enables transparency, and also provides the buyer with an aggregated view of specific sellers and agencies and direct contact with a large pool of sellers.
Digital platforms
ZAP Group also provides its customers with other digital services such as Search Engine Marketing (Pay Per Click Google and Facebook campaigns) and Search Engine Optimization for their websites. ZAP Group also provides website design services, creation of new websites on various tools (ZAP-X), management of social media, online business cards (GMB), and big data services.
F-106
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 25:- OPERATING SEGMENTS (Cont.)
Restaurants and events
Other
ZAP Group provides digital advertising platform for domestic travel and hospitality businesses in Israel (the “Platform”). The platform, both website and application, allows end users to order directly from the provider (hotel, guesthouse or attraction service provider). The platform provides access to millions of visiting end users annually, to approximately 1,200 vacation and leisure locations.
Ofek
Founded in 1987, Ofek is one of the leading companies in Israel in the fields of aerial and satellite mapping, geographic data collection and processing, and provider of services in numerous geographic applications. Among Ofek’s customers are many government authorities and foreign government. Ofek employs approximately 100 employees, all situated at Ofek’s headquarter in Natanya, Israel, in multiple areas of expertise: geodetic engineers, software experts, geographers and aerial photo interpreters, GIS and surveying engineers, 3D mapping and data processing experts. The company owns three aerial photography aircraft equipped with state-of-the-art mapping sensors. Ofek operates worldwide. It has successfully completed projects for various clients (government and private) in Asia, America, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and it is constantly involved in ongoing international geographic projects. Ofek aerial photography has accumulated experience in managing and executing NSDI and GIS projects and surveys for detecting, collecting and analyzing diverse geographic cadastral and environmental information.
TSG
TSG is a global high-technology company engaged in high-end technical solutions for protecting the safety of national borders, improving data gathering mechanisms, and enhancing communications channels for military, homeland security and civilian organizations.
TSG operates primarily in the defense and homeland security arenas. The nature of military and homeland security actions in recent years, including low intensity conflicts and ongoing terrorist activities, as well as budgetary pressures to focus on leaner but more technically advanced forces, have caused a shift in the defense and homeland security priorities for many of TSG’s major customers. As a result, TSG believes there is a continued demand in the areas of command, control, communications, computer and intelligence (C4I) systems, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) systems, intelligence gathering systems, border and perimeter security systems and cyber-defense systems. There is also a continuing demand for cost-effective logistic support and training and simulation services. TSG believes that its synergistic approach of finding solutions that combine elements of its various activities positions it to meet evolving customer requirements in many of these areas. TSG tailors and adapts its technologies, integration skills, market knowledge and operationally-proven systems to each customer’s individual requirements in both existing and new platforms. By upgrading existing platforms with advanced technologies, TSG provides customers with cost-effective solutions, and its customers are able to improve their technological and operational capabilities within limited budgets.
F-107
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 25:- OPERATING SEGMENTS (Cont.)
TSG markets its systems and products either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor to various governments and defense and homeland security contractors worldwide. In Israel, TSG sells its defense, intelligence and homeland security systems and products mainly to the IMOD, which procures all equipment for the Israeli Defense Force (IDF).
Shamrad
Shamrad is an Israeli private company, engaged in the supply, integration and installation of computer communication infrastructures, announcement and alarm systems and electronic security systems. Shamrad represents several companies in the field of security: ATI systems – sirens, Garrett – Metal detectors, Kopp – Ferro Magnetic detectors for MRI rooms. Shamrad has vast experience in design, supply and installation of security systems, integrated with command and control solutions, CCTV, access control and intruder detection. Shamrad provides video solutions together with high-speed networks and wireless links, allowing hundreds of camera channels to be viewed in one or many control centers. Shamrad installs IP and analog cameras in various configurations such as Bullet, Dome, PTZ, Box, and Thermal. Shamrad offers customers complete solutions for communications and telephony infrastructure, both in the fields of passive and active equipment. Amongst the services offered are the installation and maintenance of networks (local and wireless) and specific dedicated communications rooms. Shamrad has, since its inception, a dedicated department offering a complete and professional solution, with a system wide view tailored to exactly meet their customers’ requirements.
Hashahar
Hashahar Telecom & Electricity Ltd., an Israeli privately held company established in 2018, is a leading provider of telecommunications infrastructure and electrical services. The company specializes in the planning, deployment, and installation of fiber optics, structured cabling (CAT 6/7), coaxial and telephony systems for both enterprise and residential sectors, including intercity infrastructure and public sector projects. Hashahar delivers end-to-end project execution through in-house engineering, dedicated project managers, and stringent safety and data security protocols. Its clients include Bezeq, HOT, Cellcom, YES, Israel Railways, and multiple government bodies. With VPN-enabled IT infrastructure, automated triple-backup systems, and Priority ERP for operational oversight, the company maintains a high standard of execution in complex fiber deployment and communication infrastructure projects.
| b) |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Matrix and its subsidiaries | $ | $ | ||||||
| Sapiens and its subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Magic Software and its subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Michpal and its subsidiaries | ||||||||
| ZAP Group and its subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Other consolidated subsidiaries | ||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
F-108
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 25:- OPERATING SEGMENTS (Cont.)
| c) | Reporting on operating segments: |
The operating segments are identified on the basis of information that
is reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) to make decisions about resources to be allocated and assesses
its performance. The CODM has been identified as Formula’s CEO. The CODM assesses the performance of the Group based on each of
the Group’s directly held subsidiaries and company accounted for at equity operating income (or loss).
| Matrix | Sapiens | Magic Software | Michpal | ZAP Group | Other | Adjustments | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2024: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues from external customers | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inter-segment revenues | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Segment operating income | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unallocated corporate expenses | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating income | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial expenses, net | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group’s share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Taxes on income | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F-109
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 25:- OPERATING SEGMENTS (Cont.)
| Matrix | Sapiens | Magic Software | Michpal | ZAP Group | Other | Adjustments | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2023: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues from external customers | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inter-segment revenues | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Segment operating income | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unallocated corporate expenses | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating income | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial expenses, net | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group’s share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Taxes on income | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F-110
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 25:- OPERATING SEGMENTS (Cont.)
| Matrix | Sapiens | Magic Software | Michpal | ZAP Group | Other | Adjustments | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2022: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues from external customers | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inter-segment revenues | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Segment operating income | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unallocated corporate expenses | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating income | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial expenses, net | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group’s share of profits of companies accounted for at equity, net | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Taxes on income | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F-111
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 26:- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
| 1. | On 4 February 2025, Matrix completed the acquisition of |
| 2. | On March 10 , 2025, Matrix and Magic entered into
a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the purpose of negotiating a definitive agreement regarding a merger, under which Matrix will
acquire the entire share capital of Magic on a fully diluted basis, by way of a reverse triangular merger, upon completion of which Magic
will become a private wholly-owned ( |
Magic’s shareholders will receive merger
consideration in Matrix shares, based on the relative valuations of both companies presented by the their committees’ financial advisors
and the derived exchange ratio derived of
The consummation of the Merger will be subject to conditions to be determined in the definitive agreement, including: (1) obtaining each of the companies’ shareholders’ general meeting approval to the Merger, by a special majority of the minority shareholders as required under Israeli law; (2) obtaining all regulatory approvals required for the consummation of the Merger; (3) obtaining third party approvals to the Merger, as will be specified in the definitive agreement; (4) obtaining a pre-ruling from the Israeli Tax Authority in connection with the Merger and to postpone the tax liability of shareholders; and (5) completing the reporting and disclosure documents required to be published by the Companies under applicable law for the Merger’s execution and the issuance of the Consideration Shares.
| 3. | During the first quarter of 2025, Sapiens completed
the acquisition of |
F-112
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 26:- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Cont.)
| 4. | On March 11, 2025, based on the results of the Fourth quarter ending December 31, 2024, Matrix’s board of directors approved the distribution of a cash dividend of NIS |
| 5. | On March 11, 2025, in accordance with its dividend
distribution policy, Magic’s board of directors declared a semi-annual cash dividend of $ |
| 6. | On March 18, 2025, in accordance with its dividend distribution policy,
TSG’s board of directors approved the distribution of a cash dividend for a total amount of approximately NIS |
| 7. | On March 20, 2025, in accordance with the Company’s dividend
distribution policy , the Company’s board of directors approved the distribution of a cash dividend in an amount of NIS |
| 8. | On March 25, 2025, in accordance with its dividend distribution policy,
Sapiens’s board of directors approved the distribution of a cash dividend of $ |
| 9. | On March 31, 2025, following the exercise of a put option, Michpal
acquired all remaining outstanding shares of Formally Smart Form System Ltd., for a total consideration of NIS |
| 10. | On April 22, 2025 Sapiens announced the acquisition of Candela Labs, a leading intelligent automation company servicing blue-chip, APAC-based insurance clients. This strategic move aims to enhance Sapiens’ life product portfolio and expand its presence in the APAC region. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and expected to close during the second quarter of 2025. Candela offers an end-to-end insurance automation platform along with digital services and solutions. Candela has 23 customers, primarily in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Hong Kong and South Africa. The Candela team of over 100 employees is mainly in Bangalore, India. Candela is currently part of Azentio, a Singapore-based company. The acquisition of Candela is structured as a cash transaction. Candela non-GAAP full year 2024 revenues were approximately $ |
F-113
FORMULA SYSTEMS (1985) LTD.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
NOTE 26:- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Cont.)
| 11. | On April 28, 2025, Sapiens announced that it had entered into definitive agreements to acquire AdvantageGo,
a leading provider of commercial insurance software solutions specializing in underwriting workbench capabilities for both the London
market and global commercial markets. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of 2025, at which point AdvantageGo
will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Sapiens. The acquisition is structured as a cash transaction, based on an enterprise value of
£ |
| 12. | In April 2025, Magic completed a transaction to acquire additional
ordinary shares of its subsidiary CommIT Technology Solutions Ltd. (“CommIT”). Pursuant to the transaction, Magic’s
ownership interest in CommIT increased from |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
F-114
 |
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer 144 Menachem Begin Road, Building A, Tel-Aviv 6492102, Israel |
Tel: +972-3-6232525 Fax: +972-3-5622555 ey.com |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Sapiens International Corporation N.V.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sapiens International Corporation N.V. (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company on December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 27, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F-115
|
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer 144 Menachem Begin Road, Building A, Tel-Aviv 6492102, Israel |
Tel: +972-3-6232525 Fax: +972-3-5622555 ey.com |
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
| Revenue recognition | ||
| Description of the Matter |
As described in Note 2.n to the consolidated financial statements, the Company generates revenues from some long-term contracts that involve significant implementation, customization, or integration of the Company’s software license to customer-specific requirements. These contracts constitute single performance obligations that are satisfied over time. The Company recognizes revenue from such contracts using the percentage of completion accounting method, which is based on a ratio between actual costs incurred compared to the total estimated costs for the contract.
Auditing the recognition of the Company’s long-term contracts revenue was especially subjective and complex due to the significant estimation required by management to determine the total estimated costs for those contracts, particularly the projected labor costs to complete a contract. Determining the projected labor costs requires understanding the contract specific circumstances, including the specific terms and conditions of each contract, changes to the contract schedule, and complexity of the contract. Changes in the estimate of projected labor costs can have a material effect on the timing of revenue recognition.
| |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit |
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of relevant internal controls over the Company’s long-term contracts revenue process. For example, for a sample of contracts, we tested controls over management’s review of the initial estimate of total projected labor costs to complete a contract, as well as the ongoing evaluation of those estimates. We also tested internal controls over the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by management.
Our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the significant assumptions and the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data used in management’s estimate. For a sample of contracts, we tested the Company’s historical ability to accurately estimate management’s total projected labor costs by comparing the estimated labor costs period over period. We inspected a sample of contracts to understand the specific terms and conditions and the remaining obligations in the contract. We also met with various executives throughout the organization, including divisional managers, to obtain an understanding of project status and other factors considered in developing the estimate of remaining labor costs including project challenges, completed milestones, customer change orders and delays. |
| /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer | |
| A Member of EY Global |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1994.
Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 27, 2025
F-116
|
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer 144 Menachem Begin Road, Building A, Tel-Aviv 6492102, Israel |
Tel: +972-3-6232525 Fax: +972-3-5622555 ey.com |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Sapiens International Corporation N.V.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Sapiens International Corporation N.V.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Sapiens International Corporation N.V. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes, and our report dated March 27, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F-117
|
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer 144 Menachem Begin Road, Building A, Tel-Aviv 6492102, Israel |
Tel: +972-3-6232525 Fax: +972-3-5622555 ey.com |
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
| /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer | |
| A Member of EY Global |
Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 27, 2025
F-118
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Magic Software Japan K. K.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statements of financial position of Magic Software Japan K.K. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023, and the related statements of profit or loss, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, based on our audits the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Tokyo, Japan
| May 13, 2024 | /s/ KDA Audit Corporation |
| KDA Audit Corporation |
F-119