Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:37 PM Subject: NASD ADF Proposal : SR-NASD-2001-90 From the Office of James Ryan…… June 20, 2002 Mr. Jonathan Katz U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20549 Re: SR-NASD-2001-90 Dear Mr. Katz, At the urging of my brokerage firm, I was reading about the Nasdaq's Alternative Display Facility the other day, and I was quite surprised to learn about some of the things that the SEC and the NASD/NASDAQ are actually considering passing. Some of these things will hurt the markets - badly. From what I read, the SEC is telling the NASDAQ that in order to pass this SuperMontage proposal (which by the way, seems highly anti-competitive to most small to mid-sized brokerage firms and ECNs) they need to provide a viable method to display quotations on NASDAQ stocks if certain participants choose to not play on SuperMontage. Not a bad idea. But, the idea does not go far enough. The NASDAQ will naturally not put in any significant effort into making this idea work - because they don't care if it works or not. They just want SuperMontage to work. It's like (the SEC) telling the General Motors that if they want to introduce a new SUV to the market that they must make an alternative vehicle to an SUV so that those who don't want an SUV can buy the alternative vehicle instead. GM will make a go-cart because that technically satisfies the SEC, but does not really provide a viable alternative. Today, there is a guaranteed method of getting executions: Order-handling rules, best-execution rules, anti-backing-away rules, short-selling rules that utilize the National quote, etc. The ADF proposal throws all of that away and says that there are no rules. If the SEC is serious about its insistence on a viable ADF prior to the Supermontage implementation, then the SEC MUST ensure that a viable ADF is built prior to the implementation. That has to include all of the rules in place for execution and NBBO guarantee to my orders that are there today. I implore the SEC: DO NOT LET THE ADF GO FORWARD unless it builds in the execution services and rules that are in place today. Jim Ryan