August 6, 1998 Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary Securities & Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington DC 20549 Via e-mail Dear Mr. Katz: Avalon Research Group Inc. is a relatively small fully disclosed NASD BD having a minimum net capital requirement of $100,000. Avalon strongly opposes the proposal to force NASD BDs to engage an independent public accountant to attest to the Y2K reports required by the NASD or SEC. First, this is a technical issue and in most cases accountants have little relevant technology background or expertise, so the effort in reality will be of very marginal effect. The testing of software, hardware and the integration of systems is not an appropriate role for accountants to supervise or report on. Qualified consultants are the proper parties to be used as needed, on an ad hoc basis, as determined by the reporting firm itself. Second, this requirement would cause a misallocation of resources at smaller firms; namely, money that could be used directly in upgrading, conforming and testing systems would be diverted to accountants' fees with no actual benefit. Third, since the Y2K problem is not capable of being rectified with 100% certainty because of the complex interactions of electronic systems from outside the reporting firm, among other things, and due to the unyielding time frame involved, accountants will rightly feel entitled to charge substantial fees to cover their potential liability. Such fees, which BDs will have no choice but to pay, will unfairly burden smaller firms. Fourth, there are clearly better ways to accomplish the objective than by this proposal which squanders limited resources, like simply educating and properly supporting member firms and keeping managements directly responsible for their own businesses. Based on the foregoing, Avalon respectfully prays that the SEC rejects this proposal in full. Very truly yours, Adam B. Cohen Senior Vice President