From: Robert S. Schwartz [RSchwartz@lindabury.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:49 AM To: 'rule-comments@sec.com' Cc: Robert W. Anderson; 'f.battista@excite.com'; 'jsipple@topps.com' Subject: SEC File No. S7-49-02 January 8, 2003 Re: SEC File No. S7-49-02/Auditor Independence Proposed Rules Dear Sir or Madam: My comments respectfully focus on tax services, as distinguished from expert services and legal services. First, an auditor serves as an advocate for its client wherever it represents a client before the IRS. The context may be obtaining a private tax ruling, filing an amended tax return claiming a tax refund, commenting on proposed tax regulations affecting the client's business, representing a client before IRS tax examiners or representing a client before IRS Office of Appeals. All of these contexts involve posturing for the client to get the best tax result. One example: IRS examination spots, from sketchy tax return information, an entirely foreign transaction that arguably results in a $7 million US tax gain, and the IRS wants more detailed information. As a matter of practice, there is no neutrality present in dealing with IRS after this tax return is filed. Second, an auditor audits its own work whenever it proposes a tax planning strategy to a client or whenever it gives oral or wrtten advice, for example issues a memorandum, letter, etc., to a client on a tax planning strategy that the client takes into account in determining to implement the strategy. One example: an investment banking firm, "ML", proposes an off-shore tax strategy to generate a corporate capital loss of $100 million. When the auditor gives advice on the strategy, that is, the strategy works or it may not, and assuming the client proceeds, the auditor then audits its own work when it audits the adequacy or overstatement, as the case may be, of the financial statement tax reserve. The above two comments are from the perspectve of my 16 years as a tax lawyer in private practice. Third, an auditor serves as an advocate for its client wherever it provides a tax opinion to a third party in a transaction affecting the audited financial statement. Think, for example, from the perspective of a hypothetical prudent investor. The investor cannot be held to possess the knowledge to decide whether the tax opinion reflects opinions of settled tax law or reflects a position that the IRS can reasonably disagree with. A prudent, not skeptical, investor therefore would think advocacy. In addition, the auditor is auditing its own work whenever it audits a tax reserve affected by the tax issues addressed by its tax opinions relating to corporate taxes. Thank you for allowing me to comment on the SEC auditor independence proposed rules. Sincerely, Robert S. Schwartz, Esq.