Author: Norman Adams at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 2:58 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No.S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99. Information should
be available to all interested parties at the same time.
Rosemary Adams
adamsn@primenet.com
Author: WADE ANDERSON at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 5:33 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Wade Anderson
Author: "Karen Bahnsen" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 10:00 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
CC: "Karen M Bahnsen" at Internet
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99" is probably sufficient.
Karen M. Bahnsen
Illinois
Author: Shelly Baker at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 5:04 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
Shelly Baker
Sabre, Inc.
Author: "Bissett; Jim" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 2:48 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Author: "R Chabot" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 1:28 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
CC: at Internet
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I am an individual investor and the proposed regulation opening up
disclosure requirements is LONG OVERDUE. The response from the brokers
suggests they need the status quo so that they can interpret info for us ...
all of this to protect us from ourselves.
Please.
Enact the proposed regulation ASAP!
Robert Chabot
Author: Patrick Chekal at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 4:34 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
As a private investor I consider limited access
"Analyst Conference Calls" as legitimate as the
actions that sent Michael Milliken to jail.
The proposed rule says you cna profit from inside
information (resell it as "research") if the size of
the circle is big enough.
Any rule concerning business forecsts should require a
filing with the SEC prior to any other public
disclosure. The filing should be available online by
8:00 AM eastern time on the day of the disclosure.
Patrick Chekal
Barrington RI
Author: at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 10:33 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
To Whom it May Concern,
The investing public has a right to know about the companies in which they are
investing.
Please make this happen.
Sincerely,
Jerome Cler
Author: "Jaime M. Eulalio" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 8:50 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Author: "THOMAS N.FERGUSON" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 9:39 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Thomas N. Ferguson
Author: Duane Fiddyment at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 3:04 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Author: sarah e flemming at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 4:57 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I need and want information as much as any "professional" trader,
analyst or broker. My money is more important to me than it is to anyone
else and I deserve the information to make taking care of myself
possible.
Thank you,
______________________________________
Sarah E. Flemming
"Have Pager Will Travel!"
(864) 388-1379 - (864) 388 1375 FAX
(800) 724-3329 x 3009244
"The Devil is giving away lakefront property. Can you afford it?"
Author: at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 5:31 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: PROPOSED REGULATION FD:FILE NO. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I FAVOR THE PROPOSED REGULATION :FILE NO. S7-31-99
H FRIEZE
Author: "ggeiss" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 7:16 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
In fairness to all, full disclosure should mean everyone has access to each bit
of information at the same time.
I favor the proposed legislation.
Gunther R. Geiss, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus, Administrative Science
Adelphi University
Garden City, NY 11530
Author: "Dennis Giere" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 9:54 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: PROPOSED REGULATION FD: FILE NO.S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I SUPPORT THIS ADPOTION OF THIS REGULATION.
DENNIS GIERE 2903 27TH ST SW FARGO, ND
Author: "Michael Gillespie" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 9:38 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
All Information should be available at the same time to all investors big or
small, analyst or not. The basic idea of transparency is fundamental to a
properly functioning market. Without complete transparency the cornerstone
of faith in the market is undermined leading to a lose of credibility that
the foundation of our inter American System is based on.
Author: Kurt H at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 10:14 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
**********************************************************
Regards,
Kurt Hagerbaumer
**********************************************************
Author: "Dave" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 10:58 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed FD file no S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Although, I myself would love to receive "advanced info" before the rest of the
public, I am not wealthy and cannot afford a personal analyst for my stocks,
etc. I would veto in favor of new fair disclosures rules.
Sincerely,
Ms. Henry.
Author: Steve Heppe at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 2:35 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
=====
Steve Heppe
Applied Solutions
877 440-1786
Author: "Houser; Bruce B; GLSVC" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 11:05 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Bruce Houser
Global Account Manager
Phone 630-513-5560
Fax 630-513-8608
Email bhouser@att.com
Author: Haydn Huntley at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 2:24 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed
Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I am strongly in favor of fair disclosure!
--
Haydn Huntley
huntley@ArtSelect.com
http://www.artselect.com Custom Framed Art at a 40-50% Savings!
Author: at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 10:42 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
To Whom It May Concern:
I feel the general public has a right to this information. This information s
hould not be accessible to only stock brokers and analysts. The individual
investor is competent enough to understand and utilize information in making
their own investment decisions contrary to what insiders might think. To
control the dissemination of information to a limited few in our
technological age is unfair and allowing a monopoly of sorts.
Grace Jennings
Author: "Dik Jones" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 1:26 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Please level the field for us small investors.
Richard C. Jones
Author: at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 7:45 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor this proposed regulation.
Douglas King
Simi Valley, CA
Author: "David & Lori Kunkel" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 7:46 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD : File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I believe you should level the playing field between the individual/small
investor and the large institutional investors by requiring disclosures to both
on an equal basis. With today's technology, there is no reason we should not be
included.
Author: Louis at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 8:21 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
We favor this regulation...
Dan Louis
Private Investor
Author: "Luber; Larry" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 11:25 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I think the playing field should be leveled. Why should large wall street
firms receive an unfair advantage over the individual investor. Such an
advantage flys in the face of the foundations of full disclosure required of
public companies. This regulation will proctect the public from the "Street"
avarious behavior. This is the type of government regulation that makes
sense and is in the interest of everyone who invests as an individual
investor especially since a lot of individual investors have their
retirement funds in the market.
Larry B. Luber
7430 Somerset
Clayton, Missouri 63105
Author: Gareth Mark at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 12:05 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
As an investor, I am appalled by the current rules that allow companies
selectively to release material information to Wall Street analysts without
simultaneously releasing the news to the public at large, and more
importantly, without releasing that information to me, an owner. The current
rules have literally cost me money because a select group of Wall Street
insiders have been granted access to material information and have acted on
that information before I was provided the same information. It should be
mandatory for all releases of material information to be to the public at
large. Some forward-looking companies already provide open disclosure. Now
it's time to require all companies fairly to disclose material information.
Gareth L. Mark
Egghead.com
Author: at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 10:30 AM
Normal
Receipt Requested
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99. It will result in far more people
investing in the market because they now have access to essential decision
making information. Also, it will develop a trust in those who once thought
the market could not be trusted because only a certain few got information
before hand.
Haywood Meade
County of Henrico, Virginia
Information Technology Dept.
voice: (804) 501-4496 fax: (804) 672-5990
e-mail: mea@co.henrico.va.us
Author: "Dennis Murphy" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 8:01 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Please pass and enforce this needed rule. The investing public has been kept in
he dark for too long.
Dennis M. Murphy
Author: najjarl at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 10:57 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
I support the new public desclosure law.
Loai najjar
Author: at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 7:03 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Re: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
The dissemination of information should be available for all. Not just the
privileged few. Our democracy is based upon equal rights for all. There is
no free ride, just because you have the inside edge.
R.J. Rega, M.D.
Author: jimrose@wfubmc.edu (Jim Rose) at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 1:26 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor proposed regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
James C. Rose
Author: "Tim Ryan" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 12:07 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: proposed regulation Fd: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor the proposed legislation against selective disclosure.
Author: Walt at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 2:48 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Information should be made freely available on an equal basis to all
investors, not filtered through "investment advisors".
Walter Schlichting
60 Lamotte St
Sandusky MI 48471
Author: "Schnaars; William B" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 7:21 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I am completely in favor of this legislation. To allow companies to provide
information to analysts and other groups that may not even be stockholders
seems to foster some level of insider trading. It certainly puts the
existing stockholder at a disadvantage that should not exist. There is a
legal liability of the company to its stockholders; there isn't such a
liability to analysts.
Author: Stuart Smith at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 8:48 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I am in favor of Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
I see no reason to offer preferential treatment to a select group of
people in the release of company information. On the contrary, it
smacks of insider trading. It is clearly unfair to the public at large
and creates times of imperfect information and an inefficient market.
Stuart Smith
Author: at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 12:31 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Please support fair, universal disclosure!
Christian M Stanley
Berkeley, CA
Author: "K&C Streeter" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 3:23 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I want the public at large to get the same info as the analysts so I can make my
own informed decision at the same time as others. It is NOT FAIR analysts get
the info first. This should have been a rule/law long ago.
C. Streeter
Mi.
Author: "Vollmer; Sallie" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 11:46 AM
Normal
Receipt Requested
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Sarah Vollmer
Author: "Wauters; Kevin" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 12:23 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
Best regards,
Kevin Wauters
Author: "MsxAdmin4 (CORP; CAP; Damon West)" at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 2:33 PM
Normal
Receipt Requested
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Damon West
Office: (513) 395-7970
Fax: (513) 956-2428
Author: Lorey Wheeler at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 9:55 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed regulation FD: File no s7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor proposed regulation FD: File No S7-31-99.
Lorey Wheeler
Arizona State University
Author: swhitt@netscape.com (Steve Whitt) at Internet
Date: 05/01/2000 10:02 AM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
It is time that the single small investors gets the same information at
the same time as the analysts do.
Thank you.
--
Steve Whitt
Customer Support Lead
iPlanet Web Technical Support
Sun|Netscape Alliance
swhitt@netscape.com
650-937-6518
