From: jennifer carty [jennifercarty@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:24 PM To: rule-comments@sec.gov Cc: kwhawkins@ualr.edu; jennifercarty@hotmail.com Subject: Public Accountability Board (s7-24-02) To Whom it May Concern, The accounting profession and the world of business has turned upside down with the recent business debacles. The only way to recover and restore investor confidence is to try to ensure that all measures possible will be taken to prevent this from happening. How do we do that? Is the Public Accountability Board the answer? I do not believe this is the answer. Can a board, full of members without extensive accounting backgrounds, prevent material misstatements or fraud? For that matter, does this board even know what to look for. The board will have no effect on managements' business ethics or internal controls. These are areas where problems originate. The blame for recent events can not be shifted to one party. All parties involved are responsible and one big problem for auditors is independence. Big clients are large revenue sources for the firms. Independence will always be affected because auditors are being paid by a client. This is where the focus needs to be. The thought of developing a Board that will not be heavily occupied by accountants is somewhat offensive. How can this board regulate something that is doesn't have an extensive understanding of? What message does this send? Does the SEC no longer have faith in the profession? What happens when this board fails to detect another "Enron"? What message will that send to investors? I do believe this Board might have the capability to prevent the scandals from becoming as huge as Enron, but will investor confidence be spared? The solution of a Public Accountability Board only leaves me with more doubts and questions then answers and reassurance. J. House Accounting Major, MBA Student _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com