Subject: File No. S7-23-9; Release No. IC-24082 Date: 11/26/99 10:09 AM November 26, 1999 Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary Securities & Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549-0609 RE: File No. S7-23-99; Release No. IC 24082 Daar Mr. Katz: Under the rule proposed in Release No. IC-24082, , some fund groups will find it necessary to increase the number of independent directiors in order to have a simple or super-majority, depending on the final requirement adopted by the SEC. In addition, some fund groups will find it necessary to engage separate counsel, either for the independent directors or for the full fund board. Adding one or more directors and also adding legal fees for an independent counsel could prove to be expensive for some smaller fund groups. It would appear that it would be beneficial for smaller funds and their shareholders, who must bear these expenses, to allow these two roles to be combined.in appropriate circumstances. Thus, a qualified 1940 Act lawyer could serve as both independent legal counsel to a fund's independent directors, and also could serve as an additional independent director. If board fees were $10,000 per annum, for example, the independent counsel /independent board member could recive the regular board fee of $10,000, and an additional supplement of $10,000 to $15,000 for the extra responsibility of being an "independent counsel" director in much the same manner as some "lead" directors may now function. Because the proposed rule is predicated upon the future ability of the fund group to use certain exemptions, the SEC should include a statement in the final rule that such dual service would be acceptable, if that is deemed to be desirable, provided the lawyer serving in the dual capacity had acceptable 1940 Act experience and credentials and otherwise satisfied the independence requirements of Sec. 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act. . Charles D. Reaves Executive Vice President Longleaf Partners Funds