Subject: File No. S7-16-98 Comment Letter Date: 8/18/98 10:27 AM August 19, 1998 Mr. Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 450 5th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20549-6009 Dear Sir: I am corresponding to you regarding the SEC's proposed amendment to Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice. I appreciate the opportunity to provide my input prior to any revisions to disciplinary rules for accountants who practice before the SEC. While I understand the need to create greater certainty and consistency regarding the application of Rule 102(e), I do not believe the proposed amendment appropriately accomplishes these objectives. As a member in industry of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), I support the AICPA's position on the proposed amendment. I agree with the AICPA's position that a Rule 102(e) negligence standard with respect to accountants contravenes public policy, treats accountants in a discriminatory manner and would actually diminish the vital role of accountants as guardians of the financial reporting system. I also agree that it would be better if the Commission instead were to adopt the approach urged in the AICPA's rule making petition and sanction accountants only in the event of a knowing or conscious and deliberate violation of applicable professional standards or a pattern of misconduct that can be shown to create the required risk to the Commission's processes or the financial reporting system. I believe this matter is of great significance to the accounting profession. Again, I appreciate the opportunity to express my views and urge the Commission to strongly consider the AICPA's opposition to the proposed amendment. Very truly yours, W. Randall Dickerson, CPA