Date: 9/1/98 10:08 AM Subject: File No. S7-16-98 File No. S7-16-98 This email provides comment on the SEC's proposed amendment to Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice. I oppose the proposal as currently drafted. While I support the need for clarification of Rule 102(e), I would like to see the proposed rule modified to be consistent with the AICPA's proposed definition. The accounting profession is currently suffering from an inability to recruit the best and brightest for a variety of reasons. One of the reasons the accounting profession is disadvantaged is that accounting professionals must work in an environment that exposes them to substantial risk of liability for non-compliance with professional accounting standards. While compliance with accounting standards is a cornerstone of our profession that I support, I believe accountants are unreasonably exposed in our litigious society. I believe the proposed amendment to Rule 102(e), as currently drafted, will exacerbate this issue. The proposed amendment is drafted very broadly and gives the SEC an unreasonable amount of discretion in sanctioning accountants for improper professional conduct. It is unreasonable to think that an environment in which the SEC has a license to sanction an accountant on matters of judgment regarding the preparation of financial statements will benefit the public interest. Additionally, it is inappropriate for the SEC to hold accounting professionals to a higher standard of conduct when practicing before the SEC than those standards applied to an attorney or non-financial corporate officer or director. I urge the SEC to reconsider the proposed rule drafted by the AICPA, as the SEC proposal is not consistent with the interests of the accounting profession and, most importantly, the interests of the investing public. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for your consideration of these comments. Thomas Arnold Vice President and Corporate Controller Storage Technology Corporation