From: Stevens & Lee
Sent: July 29, 2005
To: rule-comments@sec.gov
Subject: File No. 265-23


Dear Mr. Katz:

We have a small company that may offer to sell a class of securities to under 300 shareholders in connection with an acquisition that it intends to make, which results in the following sequence of events:

  • In connection with the acquisition, the company will be required to file a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 because there is no exemption available.
     
  • Filing of a registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 triggers Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Section 15(d) requires the company to file certain reports as required pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Rule 13a-1 requires the company to file an annual report for each fiscal year after the last full fiscal year for which financial statements were filed in its registration statement.
     
  • The duty to file under Section 15(d) triggers compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires each annual report to contain an internal control report.

However, the duty to file under Section 15(d) is automatically suspended after the fiscal year within which the company's registration statement became effective because the class of securities will be held of record by less than 300 persons, which means the company will be required to file only one annual report.

The Commission is currently considering ways in which the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 adversely affects small businesses and steps it can take to mitigate these effects. We submit that the foregoing example is a situation where Commission action granting relief is appropriate. Compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 creates significant costs and burdens for companies, especially for smaller public companies which are required to file only one annual report. We think the costs and burdens of complying with Section 404 adversely affect the small public companies and will probably deter some smaller companies from capital markets transactions. Our client may well conclude that the costs and burdens of Section 404 compliance outweighs the benefit of the potential acquisition. Therefore, we respectfully ask the Commission to consider granting relief from having to comply with Section 404 for companies which are only required to file reports because of the application of Section 15(d).

Very truly yours,
STEVENS & LEE

Vicki W. Li
Stevens & Lee
620 Freedom Business Center
Suite 200
King of Prussia, PA 19406