SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15953 / October 27, 1998 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Liberty Capital Group, Inc. and Jason A. Greig, Civil Action No. C98-1515C (USDC WA). On October 27, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Washington against a Bellingham, Washington publicist for distributing over the Internet and through other means, information regarding certain microcap companies without disclosing compensation received from those companies. The Commission's complaint names Liberty Capital Group, Inc. ("Liberty") and Jason A. Greg ("Greig"), the sole officer, director and shareholder of Liberty, as defendants and alleges that Liberty and Greig violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933. The complaint alleges that from April 1996 until April 1998, Greig, through Liberty, published Jay Greig's Liberty Letter in which he provided general information on approximately twenty companies quoted on the Nasdaq Smallcap market, the Nasdaq Bulletin Board, and also traded on the Canadian Exchanges. During 1997, Greig developed a website for Liberty and began publicizing on the website, as well as through e-mails and postings on the Internet bulletin boards, three of the companies featured in the newsletter, as well as six other companies. The complaint alleges that Liberty, through Greig, entered into written or oral agreements with several of the companies publicized on Liberty's website or in the newsletter, requiring the companies to pay varying amounts of cash and/or securities for these services. The complaint alleges that Liberty and Greig received cash and stock, both directly and indirectly from at least seven of the companies, totaling nearly $1.2 million. The complaint alleges that although the newsletter disclosed that Liberty received compensation from issuers for publicizing their stocks, it failed to disclose the existence of the agreements between Liberty and certain of the publicized companies, or the various amounts of compensation. The complaint also alleges that until very recently, Liberty only made a vague, general disclosure on its website about the receipt of compensation, and also failed to disclose the existence of the agreements and any specifics on past or agreed upon compensation.