UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15690 / March 31, 1998 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1022 / March 31, 1998 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SURENDRA GUPTA, BHASKER B. RAO, AND R. RAMANA PENUMARTY, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Civil Action No. 96-3608 VRW. The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that on March 25, 1998, the Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, entered settled judgments concluding the Securities and Exchange Commission's lawsuit against three former officers of California Micro Devices Corporation ("Cal Micro"), a high-technology company headquartered in Milpitas, California. The Commission's complaint alleges financial reporting fraud by all three defendants and illegal insider trading by Rao and Penumarty. Each defendant settled the Commission's lawsuit against him without admitting or denying the allegations contained in the Commission's complaint. Surendra Gupta, Cal Micro's former president, consented to pay a civil penalty of $72,250.00; to be barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company; and to be enjoined from future violations of applicable federal securities laws. Bhasker Rao, Cal Micro's former manager of its Tempe plant operations, consented to pay disgorgement of $70,203.75 (representing his losses avoided as a result of sales of Cal Micro stock) plus prejudgment interest of $20,025; to pay a civil penalty for insider trading of $70,203.75; to pay an additional civil penalty of $10,000; to be barred as an officer or director of a public company for five years; and to be enjoined from future violations of applicable federal securities laws. Ramana Penumarty, Cal Micro's former manager of its Milpitas plant operations, consented to pay disgorgement of $58,385.43 (representing his losses avoided as a result of sales of Cal Micro stock) plus prejudgment interest of $17,310; to pay a civil penalty for insider trading of $58,385.43; to pay an additional civil penalty of $10,000; to be barred as an officer or director of a public company for five years; and to be enjoined from future violations of applicable federal securities laws. The Commission's complaint, filed September 26, 1996, alleges that during Cal Micro's fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 the defendants artificially inflated Cal Micro's publicly reported revenue by directing employees to falsify documents in order to create the appearance that certain goods had been shipped to customers when, in fact, the goods had not been shipped or, in most cases, manufactured. The complaint further alleges that as a result of the defendants' fraudulent conduct, Cal Micro's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994, were materially false and misleading. The complaint finally alleges that Rao and Penumarty engaged in illegal insider trading by selling Cal Micro stock in 1994 while in possession of material non-public information, including, but not limited to, the knowledge that they had falsified the Company's books and records, circumvented its internal accounting controls, artificially inflated its reported revenues, and received internal reports which quantified the amount of false revenue booked on unshipped products. Pursuant to the settlement, Gupta consented to be enjoined from future violations of Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-13, 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 thereunder. Rao consented to be enjoined from violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act"), Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), 13(b)(5), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-13, 13b2-1, and 16a-3 thereunder. Penumarty consented to be enjoined from violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-13, and 13b2-1 thereunder. For additional information see Litigation Release No. 14776; Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 750 (January 4, 1996).