UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15538 / October 21, 1997 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. OFFSHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, et al. 3:96-CV-2655, USDC, ND/TX (Dallas Division) The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that on October 20, 1997, in United States District Court, Dallas, Texas, Final Judgments of Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief were entered against William R. Brosseau, Charles E. Rose, and Kenneth W. McKay, individually and as the representative for relief defendants Ken McKay Investment Company, Inc., and Prodigal International, Inc. Brosseau, Rose and McKay, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint, consented to be permanently enjoined from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Commission's complaint alleged that Brosseau, Rose and McKay fraudulently raised nearly $8 million through the sale of interests in oil and gas programs sponsored by Offshore Financial Corp. According to the complaint, the defendants told investors that the oil and gas prospects presented minimal risks, that the wells would produce investment returns of more than 40% per annum for periods as long as 25 years, and that their entire investment would be returned in less than two years. Brosseau and McKay were also alleged to have taken in excess of $1.1 million each of investors' funds for their own use. The Final Judgments also provide for the disgorgement of gains received by the defendants as a result of their conduct alleged in the complaint. Brosseau was ordered to pay $1,388,659.76, plus prejudgment interest, and McKay was ordered to pay $1,180,663.74, plus prejudgment interest, with the provision that each shall have credit for any sums paid by them to the United States Trustee in the pending bankruptcy of Offshore Financial Corp. The balance of Brosseau's and McKay's disgorgement amounts is waived based on their demonstrated financial inability to pay. Rose was ordered to pay $315,000, plus prejudgment interest; however, the full amount was waived based on his demonstrated financial inability to pay. No civil penalties were ordered by the court based on the poor financial condition of each defendant. ======END OF PAGE 1======