==========================================START OF PAGE 1======




                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                         Washington, D.C.

Litigation Release No. 14985 / July 19, 1996

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ANGELO A. CORONATO,
LAURENCE W. CORONATO, ROBERT ROGOFF AND JOSEPH V. CUSENZA,  Civil
Action No. 95-357 (District of New Jersey)(JEI)(JBR)       

     The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
announced that Joseph V. Cusenza ("Cusenza"), without admitting
or denying the allegations contained in the Commission's
Complaint that was filed in this matter on January 24, 1995,
consented to the entry of an Order of Final Judgment of Permanent
Injunction and Other Equitable Relief as to Cusenza, which
permanently restrains and enjoins Cusenza from violating Section
10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder.  Cusenza also agreed to pay the sum of
two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), representing
full payment of losses avoided from transactions in RCM
Technologies, Inc. ("RCM") common stock by Cusenza, as alleged in
the Complaint, prejudgment interest and civil penalties pursuant
to the Insider Trading Sanctions Act of 1984 [15 U.S.C.
78u(d)(2)(a)].

  The Complaint alleges that Angelo A. Coronato, Laurence W.
Coronato, Robert Rogoff and Cusenza sold the securities of RCM
while in possession of material nonpublic information concerning
the preliminary results of an independent study which concluded
that a pollution control process developed by RCM, known as
"System 99," was not technically feasible or commercially viable.

Each of the defendants sold RCM stock after the preliminary
results of the study first became known to any of them on June
18, 1992 and prior to the public disclosure of the adverse news
on July 6, 1992, thereby avoiding losses.

     The matter is still pending as it relates to Angelo A.
Coronato and Laurence W. Coronato.