U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
SEC Seal
Home | Previous Page
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 22066 / August 11, 2011

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Toby G. Scammell, United States District Court, Central District of California, Civil Action No. CV11-6597-DSF (MRWx)

SEC CHARGES FORMER INVESTMENT FUND ASSOCIATE WITH INSIDER TRADING

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Toby G. Scammell, age 26, who reaped illegal profits of over $192,000 from insider trading after he learned from his girlfriend about the impending acquisition of Marvel Entertainment, Inc. by the Walt Disney Company. The SEC charged Scammell with insider trading in its complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and has alleged that Scammell purchased highly speculative Marvel call options for less than $5500. After the August 31, 2009 announcement that Marvel would be acquired by Disney, Marvel’s stock price increased over 25% and Scammell sold the Marvel options for a profit of more than $192,000 — a 3000% return in less than one month.

The SEC alleges that Scammell’s girlfriend worked on the Marvel acquisition while she was an extern in the Disney corporate strategy department. According to the complaint, Scammell’s girlfriend learned confidential information about the deal, including that Disney would pay $50 per share for Marvel and that the deal would be announced by Labor Day. Scammell purchased Marvel call options with strike prices of $50 and $45 even though Marvel had never traded above $41.74. The SEC alleges that most of the Marvel options Scammell purchased were set to expire on September 19, 2009, just a few weeks after Disney announced it would acquire Marvel. The complaint states that Scammell’s trades were so unusual that his purchase of options represented 100% of the market in many instances. At the time he purchased the Marvel call options, Scammell worked as an associate at an investment fund in Northern California, according to the complaint. The SEC also alleges that just before he purchased many of the Marvel securities, Scammell searched the internet for the terms “insider trading,” “material, non-public information,” and “Rule 10b-5.”

According to the complaint, Scammell secretly used his brother’s money to purchase the majority of the Marvel call options. The SEC alleges that Scammell’s brother gave him authority to manage his finances when he was deployed to serve in Iraq with the U.S. Army and this arrangement continued when Scammell’s brother returned to the United States. However, Scammell never told his brother that he had invested his money in Marvel or that his brother’s account had increased by more than $100,000 in less than one month as a result of the Marvel trades, according to the complaint.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Scammell violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. The SEC’s investigation is ongoing.

 

 

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2011/lr22066.htm


Modified: 08/11/2011