U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
SEC Seal
Home | Previous Page
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 21323 / December 4, 2009

Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3073 / December 4, 2009

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Black Box Corporation, Frederick C. Young, and Anna M. Baird, Case No. 09-CV-1591 (W.D. Pa.)

SEC FILES LAWSUIT AGAINST BLACK BOX CORPORATION, FORMER CEO AND FORMER CFO FOR STOCK-OPTIONS BACKDATING VIOLATIONS

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that, on December 4, 2009, it filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania against Black Box Corporation ("Black Box"), a Lawrence, PA technical services provider, its former Chief Executive Officer Frederick C. Young, 53, of Silver Point, Tennessee, and its former Chief Financial Officer Anna M. Baird, 52, of Bridgeville, PA, alleging violations related to stock-options backdating. Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, all three defendants agreed to settle the matter.

The Commission's complaint alleges that, in July and August 2007, as a result of a previously announced review of its stock options practices, Black Box filed quarterly and annual reports restating its net income for fiscal years 1994 through 2006 (the "Restatements") by identifying approximately $70.9 million of unrecorded expenses it had incurred as a result of mispriced stock option grants. Black Box was required to, but did not, record an expense for options issued at below-market prices ("in the money" options). More than one-half of the unrecorded expenses reported in the Restatements, approximately $38.1 million, stem from backdated options awarded at Young's direction.

The complaint alleges that, as Chief Executive Officer, Young had authority for the granting of stock options at Black Box. On six occasions, from 1998 through 2001, Young intentionally backdated stock option grants totaling millions of shares, to hundreds of recipients, including Black Box's officers, directors, and employees. Young chose dates for these grants from between two weeks to over a year prior to the actual dates such grants were awarded. By doing so, the options were "in-the-money" in amounts ranging from $3.19 to $43.86 per share on the dates they were actually granted (or 13% to 58% lower than the market price on the actual grant date).

The complaint further alleges that, in or about December 2000, Baird, then Black Box's Chief Financial Officer and a CPA, also participated in granting backdated options to Black Box's officers and employees. Baird personally exercised backdated options for $87,243 in excess profits. The complaint further alleges that Young and Baird engaged in their conduct despite knowing, or having reason to know, that the Company had improperly recorded compensation expenses for the options and violated the terms of its own stock option plans as disclosed in various filings with the Commission.

Black Box consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining it from violating Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. The settlement with Black Box takes into account the company's cooperation during the Commission's investigation.

Young consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 10(b),13(b)(5) and 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13b2-2, 13a-14 and 14a-9 thereunder, and aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Young agreed to pay a $120,000 penalty and to be barred from serving as an officer or director of a public reporting company for five years.

Baird consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining her from violating Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act, and Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, and aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Baird also consented to disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $118,645. In addition, Baird agreed to settle a related administrative proceeding pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice by consenting, without admitting or denying the Commission's findings, to the entry of an order suspending her from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant for five years. Settlement of the civil action is pending final approval by the court.

SEC Complaint

 

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2009/lr21323.htm


Modified: 12/04/2009