==========================================START OF PAGE 1====== UNITED STATES OF AMERICA before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 38517 / April 16, 1997 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-9215 -------------------------- : In the Matter of : : ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING Joseph P. Brooks, : REMEDIAL SANCTIONS : Respondent. : : -------------------------- I In these public administrative proceedings instituted on January 7, 1997 by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), Respondent Joseph P. Brooks ("Brooks" or "Respondent") has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except as to the jurisdiction of the Commission over him and over the subject matter of this proceeding and as to the findings contained in Section II, Paragraphs A. and E., below, which are admitted, Brooks, by his Offer, consents to the entry of findings and remedial sanctions set forth below. II On the basis of this Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions, the Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant To Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Offer, the Commission finds that: A. During all relevant times herein, Brooks was associated as a salesman with a registered broker-dealer at its Ft. Myers, Florida branch office. B. On June 27, 1996, the Commission filed a civil injunctive action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, against Brooks, alleging violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. C. Previously, on December 4, 1995, Brooks pled no contest to a one-count criminal information charging him with first degree grand theft, in connection with substantially the same conduct alleged in the Commission's complaint. State of Florida vs. Joseph P. Brooks, Case No. 95-2536 CF (Circuit Court of Lee County, Florida). D. According to the Commission's complaint, between approximately October 1991 and June 1995, Brooks misappropriated approximately $366,300 from eight mostly elderly investors and subsequently used the funds to pay, among other things, his gambling and credit card debts. The complaint further alleged that Brooks utilized a scheme whereby he opened up bank accounts in his and his customers' names by forging their names on new account documents, forging requests for the release of cash management account funds, and arranging to have the released funds forwarded by check to the addresses he controlled. Moreover, the complaint alleged that Brooks, in order to conceal his misappropriation from the defrauded customers, misled them about their monthly brokerage statements and the existence of their investments. E. On September 4, 1996, a default final judgment of permanent injunction was entered against Brooks, permanently enjoining him from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, thereunder. SEC v. Joseph Brooks, Case No. 96-235- Civ-FTM-23 (M.D. Fla.). III In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions specified in the Offer submitted by Respondent Brooks. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent Brooks be, and hereby is, barred from association with any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, investment adviser or investment company. For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary