July 8, 2008
I'm using the language another party has already posted on your webiste as I believe it is appropriate as to the voicing of my opinions as well
It is a shame the Commission has continued to fail to simply enforce the existing regulations against NAKED SHORT SELLING, a practice harmful not only to individual investors, but to our economy as well.
I support elimination of the Market Makers exemption.
I support amendment to rule 203(b)(3)(iii) of Regulation SHO - completely eliminating the close out exemption for option market makers as proposed (not alternative 1 or 2) .
I support amendment to rule 200(g)(1)which will require a "locate" on short sales securities and proper marking of sales as "long" or "short".
I also support amendment to rule 200(g)(1) proposed in the second round in release 34-56213 File No. S7-19-07 because equity investors are being harmed from mismarked sales as "long" when they are NAKED short which counterfeits shares--an illegal activity
In the event of failure to amend rule 200 (g) (1), please make and release a cost anaylsis incurred by equity investors.
The SEC must do a cost analysis incurred by equity securities investors if you do not eliminate the market maker exemption as your new data clearly shows the fails are being produced by invoking that exemption which, in turns, harms equity investors.
I continue to fail to see "why" the SEC--which proclaims on its website how it's dedicated to protecting investors--continues to fail to enforce just the rules, regulations and laws CURRENTLY on the books.
You folks are killing both small, private investors and our economy. Perhaps, if you aren't up to enforcement activity, the FED is better able to handle this.
No matter what, something NEEDS to be done ASAP to curtail the theft from we small investors.
... do you hear us?