January 12, 2013
During the campaign when I made a contribution of $10 (yes, ten dollars) I was obliged to fully disclose who I am, where I live, if I am employed. I find it shocking, not to mention unethical and unprincipled, that any contributions at all, whether hundreds, thousands, or millions, can buy, or even try to buy, elections without disclosure. Such practices seriously harm our democracy.
And so I am writing to urge the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue a rule requiring publicly traded corporations to publicly disclose all their political spending – and to do so this year.
“Dark money” groups that accept contributions from corporations, but are not required to publicly identify their corporate donors, spent millions of dollars during the 2012 elections. It is a scandal that money from publicly traded corporations – which belongs to investors – can be secretly spent to distort our democracy.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission created the loophole that enables this secret spending, but the SEC has the authority to close it.
Both shareholders and the public must be fully informed as to how much corporations spend on politics and which candidates are being promoted or attacked. Disclosures should be posted promptly on the SEC’s web site.
Thank you for considering my comment.
Susan Toth
Alexandria, VA