10-K 1 a201210-k.htm 2012 10-K 2012 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

ý
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from [                                ] to [                                ]
Commission File No. 1-8125
TOROTEL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MISSOURI
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
44-0610086
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
 
620 N. LINDENWOOD DRIVE, OLATHE, KANSAS
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
66062
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (913) 747-6111
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
NONE
 
NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o    No ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ý   No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o    No ý
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates, computed based on the closing sale price of the over-the-counter market on October 31, 2011, was $707,566. As of July 13, 2012, there were 5,515,750 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on September 17, 2012, are incorporated by reference into Part III.




TOROTEL, INC.FORM 10-K

Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Forward-Looking Information

This report, as well as our other reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "believe," "estimate," "anticipate," "project," "intend," "expect," "plan," "outlook," "forecast," "may," "will," "should," "continue," "predict" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. This report contains forward-looking statements regarding, among other topics, our expected financial position, results of operations, cash flows, strategy, budgets and management's plans and objectives. Accordingly, these forward-looking statements are based on assumptions about a number of important factors. While we believe that our assumptions about such factors are reasonable, such factors involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be different from what appear here. These risk factors include, without limitation:

•
economic and legislative factors that could impact defense spending;
•
our relatively concentrated customer base;
•
risks in fulfilling military subcontracts;
•
our ability to finance operations;
•
continued production of the Hellfire II missile system for which we supply parts;
•
the ability to adequately pass through to customers unanticipated future increases in raw material and labor costs;
•
decreased demand for products;
•
delays in developing new products;
•
markets for new products and the cost of developing new markets;
•
expected orders that do not occur;
•
our ability to adequately protect and safeguard our network infrastructure from cyber security vulnerabilities;
•
loss of key customers;
•
our ability to satisfy our debt covenant requirements;
•
our ability to generate sufficient taxable income to realize the amount of our deferred tax assets;
•
the impact of competition and price erosion as well as supply and manufacturing constraints; and
•
other risks and uncertainties.
In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking information contained in this report will prove accurate. Accordingly, our actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made herein.





PART I


ITEM 1. Business
Torotel, Inc. ("Torotel") conducts business primarily through its wholly owned subsidiary, Torotel Products, Inc. ("Torotel Products") but also operates another wholly owned subsidiary Electronika, Inc. ("Electronika") that licenses, markets, and sells ballast transformers to the airline industry. Another subsidiary, Torotel Manufacturing Corporation provides manufacturing services to Torotel Products. Torotel was incorporated under the laws of the State of Missouri in 1956. Torotel's offices are located at 620 North Lindenwood Drive, Olathe, Kansas 66062. Its telephone number is (913) 747-6111. The terms "we," "us," "our," and the "Company" as used herein include Torotel and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Torotel Products specializes in the custom design and manufacture of a wide variety of precision magnetic components, consisting of transformers, inductors, reactors, chokes, toroidal coils, and electro-mechanical assemblies. Torotel Products sells these products to original equipment manufacturers, which use them in products such as aircraft navigational equipment, digital control devices, voice and data secure communications, airport lighting devices, medical equipment, avionics equipment, down-hole drilling, conventional missile guidance systems, and other defense related applications.

Our airport lighting devices have consisted of ballasts assemblies and injection molded products. The ballasts assemblies
have been built since 2009 while production of the injection molded products began in late calendar year 2010. In Torotel's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2012,we disclosed that we were evaluating the injection molded products to determine if re-designing the products would enable us to improve our position in this market.  Based on this review and subsequent to April 30, 2012, we decided not to move forward with a re-design and will discontinue production of the injection molded business effective with the conclusion of the existing orders in July 2012. Sales of the injection molded products were $394,000 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012.
Electronika's ballast transformers activate and control the lights in airplane cockpits and passenger compartments and are used as spare and replacement parts in DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-80, and MD-88 aircraft.
The following discussion includes the business operations of Torotel Products (which includes Torotel Manufacturing Corporation) and Electronika.
TOROTEL PRODUCTS
Principal Products
Torotel Products specializes in the custom design and manufacture of a wide variety of precision magnetic components, and electro-mechanical assemblies for use in military, aerospace and industrial electronic applications. These products are used to modify and control electrical voltages and currents in electronic devices. For example, if equipment containing one of these components receives an electrical voltage or current which is too high, the component would modify and control the electrical voltage or current to allow proper operation of the equipment. While Torotel Products primarily manufactures these products in accordance with pre-developed mechanical and electrical requirements, in some cases it will be responsible for both the overall design and manufacturing. These products are sold to manufacturers who incorporate them into an end-product. The major applications include aircraft navigational equipment, digital control devices, medical equipment, avionics systems, airport lighting devices, down-hole drilling, conventional missile guidance systems, and other defense related applications. Torotel Products has a line of 400 Hz miniature power transformers listed on the Qualified Products List ("QPL") of the Department of Defense ("DoD"), which requires re-qualification with the DoD every five years. The most recent re-qualification approval was received in 2007. Torotel Products anticipates re-qualification approval in late calendar year 2012. Sales of the QPL products represent approximately 3% of the net sales of Torotel Products.

Marketing and Customers
Torotel Products' sales do not represent a significant portion of any particular market. While approximately 39% of annual sales in fiscal year 2012 came from select commercial markets, such as aerospace, airport lighting, oil drilling and telecommunications, historically Torotel Products has primarily focused its activities toward the military market. As a result, the business of Torotel Products is subject to various risks including, without limitation, dependence on government appropriations and program allocations, potential cutbacks in military spending, the requirement that some of our products be approved and qualified by the government before we can sell them, and the competition for available military business. In recent years, Torotel


Products has been pursuing revenue opportunities in electro-mechanical assemblies. While these assemblies will continue to be a major focus going forward, Torotel Products also has been pursuing revenue opportunities in larger and higher voltage transformers, motor windings, plus products sourced from low-cost manufacturers in overseas markets who are compliant with aerospace standards.
Torotel Products maintains a website at www.torotelproducts.com. Torotel Products markets its products primarily through an internal sales force and independent manufacturers' representatives paid on a commission basis. These commissions are earned when a product is sold and/or shipped to a customer within the representative's assigned territory. Torotel Products also utilizes its engineering department in its direct sales efforts for the purpose of expanding its reach into new markets and/or customers. Other sales methods may include visits to customers, lunch-and-learn presentations to customers' engineers, catalog brochures, trade show exhibits and speaker presentations at trade shows.
Torotel Products is an approved source for magnetic components used in numerous military and aerospace systems, which means Torotel Products is automatically solicited for any procurement needs for such applications. The magnetic components manufactured by Torotel Products are sold primarily in the United States, and most sales are awarded on a competitive bid basis.
Torotel Products has a primary base of about 25 customers that provide nearly 90% of its annual sales volume. This customer base includes many large prime defense and aerospace companies. Torotel Products' primary strategy focuses on providing superior service to this core group of customers, including engineering support and new product design. The objective is to achieve growth with these customers, or other targeted companies that possess the potential for inclusion into the core group. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, sales to a major customer accounted for 51% of the net sales of Torotel Products. A loss or material reduction in orders from this customer could have a material adverse affect on us.
Competition
The markets in which Torotel Products competes are highly competitive. A substantial number of companies utilizing similar resources sell components of the type manufactured and sold by Torotel Products. In addition, Torotel Products sells to a number of customers who have the capability of manufacturing their own electronic components.
The principal methods of competition for electronic products in the markets served by Torotel Products include, among other factors, price, on-time delivery performance, lead times, customized product engineering and technical support, marketing capabilities, quality assurance, manufacturing efficiency, and existing relationships with customers' engineers. While magnetic components are not susceptible to rapid technological change, Torotel Products' sales, which do not represent a significant share of the industry's market, are susceptible to decline given the competitive nature of the market.
Manufacturing
Nearly all of Torotel Products' sales consist of electronic products manufactured to customers' specifications. Aside from contractually required finished goods buffers, only a limited inventory of finished goods is maintained. Although special wire-winding machines and molding machines are used in the production process, the various electronic products are manually assembled, with numerous employees and some subcontractors contributing to the completion of the products.
Essential materials used by Torotel Products in the manufacturing process include magnetic materials, copper wire, plastic housings and epoxies. We believe these materials are available from many sources. Major suppliers include Magnetics Inc., Electrical Insulation Suppliers, Inc., Mod & Fab and Magnetic Metals-Western Division. Special contact plates purchased from Fotofabrication Corporation and polycarbonate materials purchased from Spectrum Plastics are used in manufacturing the potted coil assembly for the Hellfire II missile system. Both Fotofabrication and Spectrum are the only qualified approved sources for the materials they provide. As a result, Torotel Products maintains contingent business interruption insurance on these two suppliers' facilities, as well as the customers' production facility, to insure against loss of business income associated with a disruption in production at either supplier or at the customer as a result of a fire, tornado, explosion or other similar type loss.
Torotel Products has not experienced any significant curtailment of production because of material shortages, but any long lead times or high dollar minimum orders could have an adverse impact on sales bookings.
Engineering, Research and Development
Torotel Products does not engage in research and development activities, but it does incur engineering expense in designing products to meet customer specifications.
Governmental Regulations
A significant portion of Torotel Products' business is derived from subcontracts with prime contractors of the U.S. government. As a U.S. subcontractor, Torotel Products is subject to federal contracting regulations. These subcontracts provide


that they may be terminated at the convenience of the U.S. government. Upon such termination, adequate financial compensation is usually provided in such instances to protect from suffering a loss on a contract. These subcontracts also provide that they may be terminated for default for failure to perform a material obligation in a subcontract. In the event of a termination for default, the customer may have the unilateral right at any time to require Torotel Products to pay the excess, if any, of the cost of purchasing a substitute item from a third party. If the customer has suffered other ascertainable damages as a result of a sustained default, the customer could demand payment of such damages. Torotel Products has never experienced any terminations for default.
As a supplier of products for military applications, Torotel must comply with laws concerning the export of material used exclusively for military purposes. The export of those types of materials is covered under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations ("ITAR") and the Arms Export Control Act ("AECA"). Torotel is licensed with the U.S. Department of State making it eligible to provide defense-related components pursuant to ITAR and AECA. This license is renewed annually each October.
Intellectual Property
The products sold by Torotel Products are not protected by patents or licenses. Torotel Products relies on the expertise of its employees in both the design and manufacture of its products. Because of the highly competitive nature of the industry, it is possible that a competitor may also learn to design and produce products with similar performance characteristics. Torotel has been issued U.S. Trademark Registration #1,123,071 for "TOROTEL". This trademark registration expires July 24, 2019.
Environmental Laws
In fiscal year 2012, Torotel Products incurred costs of approximately $1,000 to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations on the proper handling, storage, disposal, and discharge of hazardous materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of employees, the community, and the environment. Torotel Products anticipates similar costs to be incurred in the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013.
Employees
Torotel Products presently employs 112 full-time and 1 part-time employee. We believe an adequate supply of qualified personnel is available in the facility's immediate vicinity. Torotel's employees are not affiliated with any union.

ELECTRONIKA

Principal Products

Electronika sells ballast transformers to the airline industry. These transformers activate and control the lights in airplane cockpits and passenger compartments. Electronika's ballast transformers are used as spare and replacement parts in DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-80 and MD-88 aircraft.

Marketing and Customers

Sales of ballast transformers have been made to the airline industry primarily for use in DC-8 and DC-9 aircraft. As a result, the business of Electronika is subject to various risks including, without limitation, the age of the fleet that uses Electronika's products, the eventual retirement of that fleet, and its replacement with newer aircraft, and competition for the available spare parts business. Electronika's sales do not represent a significant portion of any particular market. The Federal Aviation Administration has approved Electronika as a source for ballasts on the DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-80, and MD-88 aircraft, and Electronika generally is automatically solicited for any procurement needs for such applications. The ballast transformers are sold primarily in the United States, and most sales are awarded on a competitive bid basis. Although all existing orders are subject to schedule changes or cancellation, adequate financial compensation is usually provided in such instances to protect the contractor from suffering a loss on a contract. Electronika has a primary base of approximately five customers. In the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, sales to two customers accounted for a total of 85% of the net sales of Electronika.

Competition

The market in which Electronika competes is not highly competitive, but it is shrinking due to the age and retirement of the aircraft that use the ballasts sold by Electronika and due to the lack of usage of these ballasts on newer aircraft. A limited number of companies sell ballasts of the type sold by Electronika. The ability of Electronika to compete depends, among other factors, on price, lead times, on-time delivery performance and quality assurance.

Manufacturing



Electronika's requirements for ballast transformers are outsourced pursuant to a Manufacturing Agreement ("Agreement") with Magnetika, Inc. ("Magnetika"), a corporation owned by the Caloyeras family, which presently owns approximately 46% of the common shares of Torotel. Under the terms of the agreement, Magnetika provides all necessary raw material, labor, testing, packaging and related services required to complete the manufacture, delivery and sale of the ballast transformers, and Electronika is obligated to order all of its ballast transformer requirements exclusively from Magnetika. Electronika retains ownership of all designs, drawings, specifications and intellectual property rights associated with the ballast transformers. In exchange for the services provided to Electronika under the Agreement, Magnetika receives 40% of the net sales price of all ballast transformers sold by Electronika. The initial 10-year term of the Agreement expired on April 1, 2012; however, pursuant to the terms, the Agreement continues on a year-to-year basis until cancelled by either party. In the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, Electronika incurred costs of $8,000 for goods purchased on trade terms of net 20 days pursuant to the Manufacturing Agreement. Of the amount purchased, $1,000 was due and payable as of April 30, 2012.

Engineering, Research and Development

Electronika does not engage in research and development activities, but it may incur engineering expense on a contract basis in designing any new ballasts.

Environmental Laws

Since Electronika purchases the ballast transformers from Magnetika, Electronika does not incur any costs for compliance with federal, state and local regulations on the proper handling, storage, disposal, and discharge of hazardous materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of employees, the community, and the environment.

Employees

Electronika has no employees because of the outsourcing arrangement with Magnetika as discussed above under "Manufacturing." All accounting related matters for Electronika are handled by Torotel employees.




ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

Information not required



ITEM 2.    Properties

Torotel owns a 24,000 square foot building located in Olathe, Kansas. This facility is occupied by Torotel Products, and also serves as Torotel's executive offices, as well as the business office of Electronika and Torotel Manufacturing Corporation. The purchase cost of the building, along with the improvements, was $1,027,000. This property is subject to a first deed of trust securing indebtedness with the Commerce Bank in the amount of $632,000. The outstanding balance bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.63% per annum and requires monthly principal and interest payments of $5,038. The note has a maturity date of September 27, 2015, may be prepaid without penalty up to $100,000 per year, and is collateralized by substantially all assets of Torotel. We believe this facility and its equipment are well maintained, in good operating condition and adequately insured.

Torotel leases approximately 18,000 square feet for manufacturing electro-mechanical assemblies, and larger and higher voltage transformers.  This facility is located in close proximity to the primary facility of Torotel in Olathe, Kansas.  This agreement commenced on September 1, 2010 and continues through February 28, 2014.  The monthly base rent is $9,485.  The aggregate base rent payments during the term of the lease will be approximately $398,000.

Present utilization of these facilities is less than 50% of maximum capacity.


ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings

None.




ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.


PART II


ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


(a)       Market Information

Trading in Torotel's common stock is conducted in the over-the-counter market pink sheets under the symbol "TTLO."

Price Range of Common Stock

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of Torotel's common stock as obtained from the Yahoo Finance website at www.finance.yahoo.com. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.


2012
2011
Fiscal Period
High
Low
High
Low
May to July
$
0.60

$
0.41

$
0.30

$
0.28

August to October
0.67

0.43

0.60

0.28

November to January
0.45

0.40

0.95

0.31

February to April
0.40

0.20

0.90

0.56


(b)       Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders

Title of Class
Number of Record Holders as of July 10, 2012
Common stock, $0.01 par value
480


(c)       Dividend History and Restrictions

Torotel has never paid a cash dividend on its common stock and has no present intention of paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The present borrowing agreements do not prohibit the payment of cash dividends.
 
(d)       Dividend Policy

Future dividends, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors in light of the circumstances then existing, including Torotel's earnings, financial requirements, general business conditions and credit agreement restrictions.

(e)       Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Torotel has a long-term incentive plan which includes a Stock Award Plan (see Note F of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The table below includes the number of shares authorized for the Stock Award Plan.



Equity Compensation Plan Information

Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in Column A)
Plan Category
A
B
C
Equity Compensation Plans approved by shareholders
—

—

—

Equity Compensation Plans not approved by shareholders
—

—

484,250

Total
—

—

484,250


Torotel also has a Directors Stock Appreciation Rights Plan for non-employee directors (see Note L of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

There were no unregistered sales of securities or any share repurchases during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012.


ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data

Information not required.



ITEM 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Torotel, Inc. ("Torotel") conducts business primarily through its wholly owned subsidiary, Torotel Products, Inc. ("Torotel Products"), but it also operates another wholly owned subsidiary Electronika, Inc. ("Electronika"). Another subsidiary, Torotel Manufacturing Corporation, provides manufacturing services to Torotel Products.

Overview

Introduction

Torotel Products specializes in the custom design and manufacture of a wide variety of precision magnetic components and electro-mechanical assemblies for use in military, aerospace and industrial electronic applications. These products are used to modify and control electrical voltages and currents in electronic devices. Torotel Products sells these magnetic components and electro-mechanical assemblies to original equipment manufacturers, which use them in products such as:

•
aircraft navigational equipment;
•
digital control devices;
•
airport runway lighting devices;
•
medical equipment;
•
avionics systems;
•
down-hole drilling;
•
conventional missile guidance systems; and
•
other defense applications.


The primary factors that drive our gross profit and net earnings are sales volume and product mix. The gross profits on mature products/programs and complex transformer devices tend to be higher than those that are still in the prototyping or early production stages and simpler inductor devices. As a result, in any given accounting period the mix of product shipments between higher and lower margin jobs has a significant impact on our gross profit and net earnings. Our operating plan continues to focus on expanding the product base beyond electronic components.



The industry mix of Torotel Products' net sales in fiscal year 2012 was 61% defense, 20% aerospace and 19% industrial compared to 58% defense, 20% aerospace and 22% industrial in fiscal year 2011. We believe the mix in fiscal year 2013 will remain weighted primarily towards defense.

Electronika is a marketing and licensing company selling ballast transformers to the airline industry. These transformers activate and control the lights in airplane cockpits and passenger compartments. Electronika's ballast transformers are used as spare and replacement parts in older DC and MD model aircraft. Electronika's net sales continue to be impacted by the decline in the number of active DC-8 and DC-9 aircraft. We expect these sales to continue to decline and eventually phase out as more of these aircraft are retired.

Business and Industry Considerations

Defense Markets

During fiscal years 2012 and 2011, the amount of consolidated revenues derived from contracts with prime contractors of the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) was approximately 61% and 58%, respectively. As a result, our financial results in any period could be impacted substantially by spending cuts in the DoD budget and the funds appropriated for certain military programs.   

 Notwithstanding the uncertainty associated with the DoD budget, we believe our overall defense business outlook remains favorable due to the present demand for the potted coil assembly for the Hellfire II missile system and new orders for electro-mechanical assemblies from major defense contractors. As of April 30, 2012, our consolidated order backlog for the defense market was nearly $8.5 million, which included $6.0 million for the potted coil assembly.


Aerospace and Industrial Markets

We provide magnetic components and electro-mechanical assemblies for a variety of applications in the aerospace and industrial markets. The significant growth factors for these markets include demand for Boeing commercial aircraft, increases in airport modernization projects (for our runway lighting assemblies), down-hole drilling applications, and general demand for electronic components.
    
We anticipate that near-term demand for aerospace and industrial products will remain consistent with current demand. We also believe that the long-term outlook remains positive because of the nature of the customers' applications for these products; however, the fragile economic recovery and the inventory of Boeing 787's in partially completed stages will likely hinder any near-term increase in demand. As of April 30, 2012, our consolidated order backlog for the aerospace and industrial markets was $1.3 million.

New Opportunities and Earnings Outlook

Lower than anticipated order bookings during the first nine months of fiscal year 2012 triggered personnel reductions and other spending cuts throughout the year. This trend in order activity reversed itself during the fourth quarter with the receipt of the new contracts for the potted coil assembly and the electro-mechanical assemblies. As a result of these new orders, the consolidated backlog is $9.8 million heading into the new fiscal year. These factors combined have us anticipating improved sales and profits in fiscal year 2013.




Consolidated Results of Operations

The following management comments regarding Torotel's results of operations and outlook should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included pursuant to Item 8 of this Annual Report. The results of Torotel Products and Torotel Manufacturing Corporation have been consolidated for discussion purposes. While each company's results are included in the following discussion, segment reporting is not applicable because the products offered are similar in form and function, and target similar markets.



Net Sales

Years ended April 30,
2012
2011
Torotel Products:
 
 
Magnetic components
$
4,594,000

$
5,722,000

Potted coil assembly
5,541,000

4,714,000

Electro-mechanical assemblies
279,000

411,000

Injection molded products
394,000

233,000

Total Torotel Products
$
10,808,000

$
11,080,000

Electronika
$
20,000

$
53,000

Total consolidated net sales
$
10,828,000

$
11,133,000


Consolidated net sales in fiscal year 2012 decreased nearly 3% as compared to fiscal year 2011. Torotel Products' net sales decreased $272,000 or 3% primarily due to lower demand for magnetic components arising from the completion of a major non-recurring commercial contract from a contractor providing replacement control boxes for a subway rail system. This decrease was partially offset by higher demand for the potted coil assembly. The lower demand for electro-mechanical assemblies was due to the conclusion of a defense-related contract for such assemblies in the prior year period. Higher sales were generated from the injection molded products for airport runway lighting since they were only in production for the second half of fiscal 2011. As disclosed previously in Item 1 Business, production of the injection molded products will be discontinued in the first quarter of fiscal year 2013. Electronika's net sales represented a small portion of consolidated net sales and decreased $33,000. Electronika's sales continue to fluctuate within a small range as overall demand for the ballast transformers is very limited.
Consolidated net sales in fiscal year 2011 increased nearly 57% as compared to fiscal year 2010. Torotel Products' net sales increased $4,003,000 or 57% primarily due to higher demand for the potted coil assembly and for magnetic components arising from (i) a non-recurring commercial contract received in February 2010 from a contractor providing replacement control boxes for a subway rail system, (ii) aerospace applications, and (iii) molded coils used in down-hole drilling applications. Additional sales were generated in fiscal year 2011 from the injection molded products for airport lighting which went into production in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011. Electronika's net sales represented a small portion of consolidated net sales, but increased $39,000.

Gross Profit
Years ended April 30,
2012
2011
Torotel Products:
 
 
Gross profit
$
3,047,000

$
3,554,000

Gross profit % of net sales
28
%
32
%
Electronika:
 
 
Gross profit
$
12,000

$
32,000

Gross profit % of net sales
60
%
60
%
Combined:
 
 
Gross profit
$
3,059,000

$
3,586,000

Gross profit % of net sales
28
%
32
%

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2012 decreased 4%. The gross profit percentage of Torotel Products decreased 4% because of higher material costs associated with the product mix and higher fixed costs due to the leased facility for manufacturing the injection molded products and the electro-mechanical assemblies and higher costs of fringe benefits such as group health insurance. These higher costs as a percentage of sales were offset partially by lower direct labor costs associated with the product mix and reductions in our workforce. The gross profit percentage of Electronika remained unchanged as it is fixed by the Manufacturing Agreement with Magnetika, Inc.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2011 decreased 2%. The gross profit percentage of Torotel Products decreased 2% because of higher material costs associated with the product mix, higher fixed costs due to the leased facility for manufacturing the injection molded products and the electro-mechanical assemblies, the full-year effect of hiring a chief operating officer and a director of operational excellence, and higher costs for fringe benefits such as group health insurance. These higher


costs as a percentage of sales were offset partially by lower direct labor costs associated with the product mix. The gross profit percentage of Electronika remained unchanged as it is fixed by the Manufacturing Agreement with Magnetika, Inc.

Operating Expenses

Years ended April 30,
2012
2011
Engineering
$
662,000

$
448,000

Selling, general and administrative
2,366,000

2,464,000

Total
$
3,028,000

$
2,912,000


Engineering expense increased 47% in fiscal year 2012. This increase primarily results from a $215,000 increase in payroll costs due to merit increases and the hiring of additional engineers.
Engineering expense increased 53% in fiscal year 2011. This increase primarily results from a $115,000 increase in payroll costs due to merit increases and the hiring of additional engineers, a $24,000 increase in travel costs, a $9,000 increase in training costs, and a $7,000 increase in depreciation.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 4% in fiscal year 2012. This decrease primarily resulted from a $158,000 decrease in stock compensation amortization expense primarily resulting from the reversal of previously amortized expense, an $88,000 decrease in the fair value of stock appreciation rights, a $73,000 decrease in training costs, and a $30,000 decrease in repairs. This decrease was partially offset by a $55,000 increase in non-recurring audit fees attributable to the restated Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2011, the material weakness as described in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011, and the SAB 108 adjustment made on our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2011, a $55,000 increase in depreciation expense, a $51,000 increase in payroll costs related to increased sales and administrative staff, a $40,000 increase in sales consulting fees, a $19,000 increase in subscription costs, and a $6,000 increase in directors fees.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 17% in fiscal year 2011. This increase primarily resulted from a $100,000 increase in payroll costs related to increased sales and administrative staff, a $67,000 increase in travel costs related to an increased focus on developing new markets and customers, a $49,000 increase in the fair value of stock appreciation rights, a $40,000 increase in depreciation expense, a $41,000 increase in information technology costs for implementation of a new ERP software system, a $28,000 increase in training costs, a $21,000 increase in costs associated with SEC filings, an $18,000 increase in office supplies, a $14,000 increase in consulting costs, an $11,000 increase in bad debt expense, and an $8,000 increase in sales and use taxes paid. These increases were partially offset by a $47,000 decrease in recruiting costs and a $2,000 decrease in insurance costs.

Earnings from Operations

Years ended April 30,
2012
2011
Torotel Products
$
288,000

$
1,008,000

Electronika
12,000

32,000

Torotel
(269,000
)
(343,000
)
Total
$
31,000

$
697,000


For the reasons discussed above, consolidated earnings from operations decreased by $666,000 in fiscal year 2012 and increased by $659,000 in fiscal year 2011.
Other Earnings Items



Years ended April 30,
2012
2011
Earnings from operations
$
31,000

$
697,000

Interest expense
(47,000
)
(46,000
)
Interest income
—

5,000

Earnings before income taxes
(16,000
)
656,000

Benefit for income taxes
—

600,000

Net earnings (loss)
$
(16,000
)
$
1,256,000


Interest expense increased $1,000 in fiscal year 2012 primarily due to a higher level of capital leases. Interest income decreased by $5,000 in fiscal year 2012. Income tax benefit decreased by $600,000 in fiscal year 2012. This was due to no change being made in the net deferred tax assets from the prior year (see Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Interest expense increased $2,000 in fiscal year 2011 primarily due to a higher debt level. Interest income increased by $3,000 in fiscal year 2011. Income tax benefit increased by $600,000 in fiscal year 2011. This was due to a change in the income tax valuation reserve allowance of $608,000 partially offset by current tax expense of $8,000 (see Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Return on Capital Employed

Return on Capital Employed ("ROCE") is the primary benchmark used by management to evaluate Torotel's performance. ROCE measures how effectively and efficiently net operating assets (NOA) are used to generate earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT). For these purposes, NOA, or Capital Employed, is defined as "accounts receivable + inventory + net fixed assets + miscellaneous operating assets - accounts payable - miscellaneous operating liabilities". The performance of Torotel's management and the majority of its decisions will be measured by whether Torotel's ROCE improves. For the fiscal years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, Torotel's ROCE was 1.23% and 17.59%, respectively. The decrease in ROCE for fiscal year 2012 is largely attributed to the lower operating income generated in fiscal year 2012.



Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of April 30, 2012, Torotel had $308,000 in cash, compared to $490,000 as of April 30, 2011. The decline in the cash position resulted from the $630,000 decrease in customer deposits, associated with the contract for the potted coil assembly.
    
The table below presents the summary of cash flow for the fiscal periods indicated.

2012
2011
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
450,000

$
(371,000
)
Net cash provided by used in investing activities
$
(496,000
)
$
(526,000
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
$
(136,000
)
$
357,000



Operating Activities

Net cash from operating activities fluctuates between periods primarily as a result of differences in operating earnings, the timing of shipments and the collection of accounts receivable, changes in inventory, level of sales, the effect of customer deposits, payments of accounts payable, and other accrued liabilities.

Investing Activities

The $496,000 of cash used in investing activities was the result of capital expenditures including an ERP system, as well as equipment needed to manufacture large transformers. We anticipate approximately $100,000 of capital expenditures during fiscal 2013 as a result of additional production equipment necessary for new opportunities, as well as the completion of a new ERP system.

Financing Activities



The $136,000 of cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2012 is the result of long-term debt payments on the mortgage, equipment line, and capital lease obligations.

Capital Resources

We believe that the projected cash flow from operations, combined with existing cash balances, will be sufficient to meet our funding requirements for the foreseeable future. Torotel does have a $500,000 bank line of credit available which could be utilized to help fund any working capital requirements, subject to the adequacy of our borrowing base and other conditions.We believe that inflation will have only a minimal effect on future operations since such effects should be offset by sales price increases, which are not expected to have a significant effect upon demand.


Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Such judgments affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We continuously evaluate our estimates and assumptions including those related to computing the carrying value of equipment, allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and the reserve for warranty costs. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material. Any changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known.

The following is a summary of the most critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when a fixed price contract or purchase order exists; delivery has occurred; and collection is reasonably assured. Selling terms are FOB Shipping Point so we consider products delivered once they have been shipped and title and risk of loss have been transferred. Our consolidated net sales arising from contracts having deliveries scheduled over a period of more than one year for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 were approximately 51% and 51%, respectively, primarily because of the contract for the potted coil assembly.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Gross trade accounts receivable are offset with an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We review the allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis, and all past due balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged against the allowance when placed for collection. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received. The majority of the customer accounts are considered past due after the invoice becomes older than the customer's normal credit terms. Interest is not charged on past due accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of April 30, 2012 and 2011 was $12,000 and $11,000, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using a FIFO approximated weighted average costing method of valuation. Our industry is characterized by short-term customer commitments and changes in demand, as well as other market considerations. Provisions for obsolete and excess inventory are based on reviews of inventory usage, quantities on hand and latest product demand information from customers. Inventories are reviewed in detail utilizing a 12-month time horizon. Individual part numbers that have not had any usage or purchases in a 12-month time period and do not have any known usage requirements are categorized as obsolete; individual part numbers having more than a 12-month supply based on the current year's usage are categorized as excess. Once specific inventory has been identified as excess or obsolete, the cost of the identified inventory is fully reserved and the cost of the inventory is not recovered until it is sold. The reserve balance is analyzed for adequacy as part of the inventory review each quarter.

Income Taxes

Our annual tax rate is based on our income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various


jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment is required in determining our annual tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions. An estimated effective tax rate for a year is applied to our quarterly operating results. In the event there is a significant or unusual item recognized in our quarterly operating results, the tax attributable to that item is separately calculated and recorded at the same time as that item. Tax law requires items to be included in our tax returns at different times than the items are reflected in our financial statements. As a result, our annual tax rate reflected in our financial statements is different than that reported in our tax returns (our cash tax rate). Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in our tax return, and some differences reverse over time, such as depreciation expense. These temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in our tax returns in future years for which we have already recorded the tax benefit in our income statement. We establish valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense recognized in our financial statements for which payment has been deferred, or expense for which we have already taken a deduction in our tax return but have not yet recognized as expense in our financial statements. The accounting for uncertainty in income taxes requires a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. If necessary, we record a liability for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured for financial statement purposes and the tax position taken or expected to be taken on our tax return. To the extent that our assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. If applicable in a given year, tax-related interest and penalties are classified as a component of income tax expense.


ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Information not required.


ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.



ITEM 9A.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), as of April 30, 2012 and have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.



Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework contained in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of April 30, 2012, due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to our enterprise resource planning system ("ERP system"). A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
    
The ERP system, which was implemented on November 1, 2010, processes all financial information for our business. Late in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, we encountered irregularities related to the calculation of inventory costs. In an effort to identify the magnitude and scope of these irregularities, we undertook an extensive review of our inventory transactions as well as other transactional areas, including revenue and accounts payable. Based on our review, we believe that these errors are systematic in nature and were not caused by our implementation or usage of the system. As a result of these errors, we filed an amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January 31, 2011 with the restated financial statements on August 15, 2011. 

Changes in Internal Controls

Since identifying the material weakness as described above, we have implemented measures to remediate the material weakness, including:

•
Performing extensive detailed price testing on our raw material inventory balance; and
•
Expanding reviews of certain functional areas including revenue and accounts payable transactions.

Other than measures implemented to remediate the material weakness, as described above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or in our estimates are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting subsequent to the date of the evaluation.

Remediation Plan

We believe that the remediation measures described above will strengthen our internal control over financial reporting and will remediate the identified material weakness. As we continue to evaluate and work to enhance internal control over financial reporting, we may determine that additional measures must be taken to address this control deficiency or may determine that we need to modify or otherwise adjust the remediation measures described above.

Because the reliability of the internal control process requires repeatable execution, the successful remediation of this material weakness will require review and evidence of effectiveness prior to us concluding that the controls are now effective. Some of the mitigating controls that have been implemented have not been in place for a sufficient period of time to demonstrate that their effectiveness is sustainable. Also, we believe that this material weakness will be fully remediated via the transition to a new ERP system. We currently anticipate that a new ERP system will be implemented on November 1, 2012. Therefore, additional time is required to validate that the material weakness is fully remediated.



ITEM 9B.    Other Information

None.





Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors
Torotel, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Torotel, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) as of April 30, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal controls over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Torotel, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ RubinBrown LLP

Overland Park, Kansas
July 24, 2012






REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
TOROTEL, INC.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Torotel, Inc and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of April 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
    
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Torotel, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of April 30, 2011, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Leawood, Kansas
July 29, 2011



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of April 30,
 
2012
2011
ASSETS
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
Cash
$
308,000

$
490,000

Trade receivables, net
1,408,000

2,208,000

Inventories
1,229,000

1,401,000

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
71,000

55,000

Deferred income taxes
116,000

250,000

 
3,132,000

4,404,000

Property, plant and equipment:
 
 
Land
265,000

265,000

Buildings and improvements
968,000

919,000

Equipment
2,179,000

1,675,000

 
3,412,000

2,859,000

Less accumulated depreciation
1,826,000

1,520,000

 
1,586,000

1,339,000

 
 
 
Deferred income taxes
492,000

358,000

Other assets
56,000

21,000

 
 
 
Total Assets
$
5,266,000

$
6,122,000

 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
Current maturities of long-term debt
$
150,000

$
125,000

Trade accounts payable
658,000

630,000

Accrued liabilities
281,000

336,000

Accrued income taxes
—

8,000

Customer deposits
206,000

826,000

 
1,295,000

1,925,000

Long-term debt, less current maturities
795,000

899,000

Commitments and contingencies


Stockholders' equity:




Common stock; par value $0.01; 6,000,000 shares authorized; 5,515,750 and 5,828,650 shares issued and outstanding as of April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively
60,000

60,000

Capital in excess of par value
12,319,000

12,425,000

Accumulated deficit
(9,184,000
)
(9,168,000
)
Treasury stock, at cost
(19,000
)
(19,000
)
 
$
3,176,000

$
3,298,000

 
 
 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
$
5,266,000

$
6,122,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years ended April 30,
 
2012
2011
Net sales
$
10,828,000

$
11,133,000

Cost of goods sold
7,769,000

7,547,000

Gross profit
3,059,000

3,586,000

Operating expenses:
 
 
Engineering
662,000

448,000

Selling, general and administrative
2,366,000

2,441,000

 
3,028,000

2,889,000

Earnings from operations
31,000

697,000

Other expense (income):
 
 
Interest expense, net
47,000

41,000

 




Earnings (loss) before provision for income taxes
(16,000
)
656,000

Provision (benefit) for income taxes
—

(600,000
)
Net earnings (loss)
$
(16,000
)
$
1,256,000

Basic earnings (loss) per share
$
—

$
0.21





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 
Shares
Common
Stock
Excess of
Par Value
Accumulated
Deficit
Treasury
Stock,
at cost
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance, April 30, 2010
5,983,545

$
60,000

$
12,395,000

$
(10,424,000
)
$
(19,000
)
$
2,012,000

Stock compensation earned
—

—

45,000

—

—

45,000

Restricted stock cancelled
—

—

(15,000
)
—

—

(15,000
)
Net earnings
—

—

—

1,256,000

—

1,256,000

Balance, April 30, 2011
5,983,545

60,000

12,425,000

(9,168,000
)
(19,000
)
3,298,000

Stock compensation earned
—

—

11,000

—

—

11,000

Restricted stock cancelled
—

—

(117,000
)
—

—

(117,000
)
Net loss
—

—

—

(16,000
)
—

(16,000
)
Balance, April 30, 2012
5,983,545

$
60,000

$
12,319,000

$
(9,184,000
)
$
(19,000
)
$
3,176,000





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended April 30,
 
2012
2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
Net earnings (loss)
$
(16,000
)
$
1,256,000

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
 
 
Benefit recognized on restricted stock award activity
(117,000
)
(15,000
)
Stock compensation cost amortized
11,000

47,000

Depreciation
306,000

200,000

Deferred income taxes
—

(608,000
)
Change in value of stock appreciation rights
(28,000
)
52,000

Increase (decrease) in cash flows from operations resulting from changes in:
 
 
Trade receivables
800,000

(1,288,000
)
Inventories
172,000

(181,000
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(51,000
)
(49,000
)
Trade accounts payable
(4,000
)
319,000

Accrued liabilities
95,000

40,000

Customer deposits
(710,000
)
(152,000
)
Income taxes payable
(8,000
)
8,000

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
450,000

(371,000
)
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
Capital expenditures
(496,000
)
(526,000
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(496,000
)
(526,000
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
Principal payments on long-term debt
(102,000
)
(648,000
)
Proceeds from long-term debt
—

1,030,000

Payments on capital lease obligations
(34,000
)
(25,000
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(136,000
)
357,000

Net decrease in cash
(182,000
)
(540,000
)
Cash, beginning of year
490,000

1,030,000

Cash, end of year
$
308,000

$
490,000

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
 
 
Cash paid during the year for:
 
 
Interest
$
47,000

$
46,000

Income taxes
$
8,000

$
—

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
 
 
Capital expenditure
$
(57,000
)
$
(50,000
)
Proceeds from capital lease
$
57,000

$
50,000


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.





NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES     

Torotel, Inc. ("Torotel") conducts business primarily through its wholly owned subsidiary, Torotel Products, Inc. ("Torotel Products"), but it also operates another wholly owned subsidiary Electronika, Inc. ("Electronika"). Another subsidiary, Torotel Manufacturing Corporation, provides manufacturing services to Torotel Products. Torotel specializes in the custom design and manufacture of a wide variety of precision magnetic components, consisting of transformers, inductors, reactors, chokes and toroidal coils, for use in commercial, industrial and military electronics. Torotel also designs and distributes ballast transformers for the airline industry.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Torotel, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Torotel Products, Inc., Torotel Manufacturing Corporation, and Electronika, Inc. and subsidiary. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Significant estimates used in preparing these consolidated financial statements include those assumed in computing the carrying value of inventory, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, the valuation allowance on deferred income tax assets, and the reserve for warranty costs. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Any changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known.

Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable. We grant unsecured credit to most of our customers. We do not believe that we are exposed to any extraordinary credit risk as a result of this policy. At various times, and at April 30, 2012, cash balances exceeded federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in the cash accounts and we do not believe we are exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to our cash.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We determine fair value by utilizing a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels as follows:

•
Level 1.    Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
•
Level 2.    Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
•
Level 3.    Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in the assessment of fair value.

The carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash, trade receivables, prepaid expenses and other current assets, trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities. As of April 30, 2012, the amount of our long-term debt approximates fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with a borrowing rate available to us. The inputs used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt are considered Level 2 inputs.

Treasury Stock

We utilize the weighted average cost method in accounting for treasury stock transactions.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when a fixed price contract or purchase order exists; delivery has occurred; and collection is reasonably assured. Selling terms are FOB Shipping Point so we consider our products delivered once they have been shipped and title and risk of loss have been transferred. Our consolidated net sales arising from contracts having deliveries scheduled over a period of more than one year for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 were approximately 51% and 51%, respectively, primarily because of the contract for the potted coil assembly.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Gross trade accounts receivable are offset with an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We review the allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis, and all past due balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged against the allowance when placed for collection. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received. The majority of the customer accounts are considered past due after the invoice becomes older than the customer's credit terms. Interest is not charged on past due accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of April 30, 2012 and 2011 was $12,000 and $11,000, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using a FIFO approximated weighted average cost method of valuation. Our industry is characterized by short-term customer commitments and changes in demand, as well as other market considerations. Provisions for obsolete and excess inventory are based on reviews of inventory usage, quantities on hand and latest product demand information from customers. Inventories are reviewed in detail utilizing a 12-month time horizon. Individual part numbers that have not had any usage or purchases in a 12-month time period and do not have any known usage requirements are categorized as obsolete; individual part numbers having more than a 12-month supply based on the current year's usage are categorized as excess. Once specific inventory has been identified as excess or obsolete, the cost of the identified inventory is fully reserved and the cost of the inventory is not recovered until it is sold. The reserve balance is analyzed for adequacy as part of the inventory review each quarter.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided in amounts sufficient to relate the costs of depreciable assets to operations primarily using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to five years for equipment and three and a half to twenty years for buildings and improvements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, we consider all short-term investments and demand deposits purchased with original maturity dates of three months or less to be cash.

Income Taxes

Our annual tax rate is based on our income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment is required in determining our annual tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions. An estimated effective tax rate for a year is applied to our quarterly operating results. In the event there is a significant or unusual item recognized in our quarterly operating results, the tax attributable to that item is separately calculated and recorded at the same time as that item. Tax law requires items to be included in our tax returns at different times than the items are reflected in our financial statements. As a result, our annual tax rate reflected in our financial statements is different than that reported in our tax returns (our cash tax rate). Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in our tax return, and some differences reverse over time, such as depreciation expense. These temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in our tax returns in future years for which we have already recorded the tax benefit in our income statement. We establish valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense recognized in our financial statements for which payment has been deferred, or expense for which we have already taken a deduction in our tax return but have not yet recognized as expense in our financial statements. The accounting for uncertainty in income taxes requires a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. If necessary, we record a liability for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured for financial statement purposes and the tax position taken or expected to be taken on our tax return. To the extent that our assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. If applicable in a given year, tax-related interest and penalties are classified as a component of income tax expense.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 advertising costs were $14,000 and $7,000, respectively.

Warranty Costs

We maintain a reserve for estimated warranty costs associated with products returned from customers. A limited warranty is provided for a period of one year which requires us to repair or replace defective products at no cost to the customer. The warranty reserve is based on historical experience and reflects management's best estimate of probable liability under the product warranties.

Share-Based Compensation

We have share-based compensation plans that include restricted stock and stock appreciation rights, which are described more fully in Notes 7 and 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We account for our share-based compensation plans in accordance with authoritative guidance under which the estimated fair value of share-based awards granted under our share-based compensation plans is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the award.


NOTE 2—INVENTORIES

The following table summarizes the components of inventories, as of April 30 of each year:

 
2012
2011
Raw materials
$
848,000

$
983,000

Work in process
296,000

300,000

Finished goods
85,000

118,000

 
$
1,229,000

$
1,401,000



NOTE 3—FINANCING AGREEMENTS

On September 27, 2010, Torotel Products entered into a new financing agreement (the “agreement”) with Commerce Bank, N.A (the “Bank”).  The agreement provides for a revolving line of credit, a guidance line of credit, and a real estate term loan. Both Torotel, Inc. and Electronika, Inc. serve as additional guarantors to all notes described below. A summary of the notes within this agreement is provided below:

 
Line of Credit
Mortgage note payable to Commerce Bank
Equipment loan note payable to Commerce Bank
Face amount
$
500,000

$
650,000

$
500,000

Proceeds received
—

650,000

380,000

Unused borrowing capacity
500,000

—

120,000

Amount previously repaid
—

49,000

111,000

Total debt outstanding
$
—

$
601,000

$
269,000

 
 
 
 
Rate
4.00
%
4.63
%
4.63
%
Maturity date
September 26, 2012

September 26, 2015

September 26, 2015

Monthly payment
$
—

$
5,038

$
7,123

 
 
 
 
Additional Criteria
Borrowing base limited to 75% of eligible receivables
15 year amortization schedule
Advance rate equal to 80% of the price of the equipment purchased


The revolving line of credit, to be used for working capital purposes, is renewable annually.  The associated interest rate is equal to the greater of the floating Commerce Bank Prime Rate (currently 3.25%) or a floor of 4% (as listed above).  Monthly repayments of interest only are required with the principal due at maturity.  This facility is cross collateralized and cross defaulted with all other facilities and is secured by a first lien on all business assets of Torotel Products. 

The real estate loan is a refinancing of our previous real estate loan and equipment loans with the Bank of Blue Valley. Monthly repayments consisting of both interest and principal are required.  This facility is cross collateralized and cross defaulted with all other facilities and is secured by a first real estate mortgage on the property located at 620 North Lindenwood Drive in Olathe, Kansas. 
    
The guidance line of credit is to be used for equipment purchases. Monthly repayments consisting of both interest and principal are required. This facility is cross collateralized and cross defaulted with all other facilities and is secured by a purchase money security interest in the assets purchased as well as a first lien on all business assets of Torotel Products. 

Torotel Products is also required to comply with specified financial covenants and as of April 30, 2012, Torotel was in compliance with these covenants.

Information concerning Torotel's long-term indebtedness as of April 30 of each year is as follows:
 
2012
2011
Mortgage note payable to Commerce Bank, maturing September 2015
$
601,000

$
632,000

Equipment loan note payable to Commerce Bank, maturing September 2015
269,000

340,000

Capital lease obligations
75,000

52,000

 
945,000

1,024,000

Less: Current maturities
150,000

125,000

 
$
795,000

$
899,000



The amount of long-term debt maturities by year is as follows:

Year Ending April 30,
Amount
2013
$
150,000

2014
140,000

2015
123,000

2016
532,000

 
$
945,000



NOTE 4—INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes reflected in the consolidated statements of operations differs from the amounts computed at the federal statutory tax rates. The principal differences between our statutory income tax expense and the effective provision for income taxes are summarized as follows:    
 
2012
2011
Computed tax expense (benefit) at statutory rates
$
(5,000
)
$
228,000

Permanent differences
11,000

10,000

Change in effective tax rate
—

(481,000
)
State tax credits and other
5,000

—

Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance
(11,000
)
(357,000
)
 
$
—

$
(600,000
)

The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:
 
2012
2011
Current tax expense
$
—

$
8,000

Deferred tax benefit
—

(608,000
)
 
$
—

$
(600,000
)
We have available as benefits to reduce future income taxes, subject to applicable limitations, the following estimated net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards:
Year of Expiration
NOL
Carryforwards
2013
$
801,000

2019
2,268,000

2022
32,000

2023
1,000

2024
77,000

2026
253,000

2027
217,000

2029
28,000

2032
$
225,000

 
$
3,902,000

We record deferred income tax assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, the difference between the financial and tax bases of assets and liabilities are determined. Deferred income taxes and liabilities are computed for those differences that have future tax consequences using the currently enacted tax laws and rates that apply to the periods in which they are expected to affect taxable income.
We record net deferred income tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. As of April 30, 2012, we anticipate the realization of a portion of our deferred income tax assets that are expected to reverse within the next few fiscal years. This amount is allocated between current and non-current portions on the consolidated balance sheet based upon when we believe the underlying items will reverse. We have adjusted the valuation allowance accordingly, which has reduced the provision for income taxes. We evaluate the appropriateness of our deferred income tax asset valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. This adjustment was made based upon evaluating the following positive and negative evidence:
Positive:
•
Taxable earnings have been present in recent years (with the exceptions of fiscal year 2010 and 2012);
•
The available carryforward periods of most of our net operating losses are of sufficient length and are at minimum risk of expiring unused;
•
We currently are performing on a contract that should enable us to sustain the current sales volume for the next few fiscal years; and
•
Our products are included in applications that generally have a longer lifecycle.

Negative:
•
We have a history of inconsistent earnings;
•
Long-term demand for the potted coil assembly used on the Hellfire II missile system is uncertain due to Department of Defense budget constraints and the possibility that the potted coil assembly could eventually be replaced;
•
The trend of positive and negative cycles may be difficult to predict due to the nature of our industry; and
•
We are in a highly competitive industry.

The following table summarizes the components of the net deferred income tax asset:
 
2012
2011
Net operating loss carryforwards
$
1,359,000

$
1,425,000

Inventory valuation reserve
150,000

157,000

Amortization and impairment of intangibles
271,000

391,000

Loss on equity and impairment in investee
427,000

427,000

Tax credit carryforwards
143,000

148,000

Other
91,000

121,000

 
2,441,000

2,669,000

Less: valuation allowance
1,833,000

2,061,000

 
$
608,000

$
608,000

The tax credit carryforwards as presented above have no expiration date.

The net deferred tax assets are presented in the accompanying April 30, 2012 and 2011 balance sheets as follows:
 
2012
2011
Current deferred income tax asset
$
116,000

$
250,000

Noncurrent deferred income tax asset
492,000

358,000

 
$
608,000

$
608,000

As of April 30, 2012, the federal tax returns for the fiscal years ended 2008 through 2012 are open to audit until the statute of limitations closes for the years in which the net operating losses are utilized. Torotel would recognize interest and penalties accrued on unrecognized tax benefits as well as interest received from favorable tax settlements within income tax expense. As of April 30, 2012, Torotel recorded no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. Management expects no significant change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefit, accrued interest or penalties within the next twelve months.



NOTE 5—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are obligated under several capital leases covering various computer hardware that expire at various dates during the next three years. All of these leases are non-cancellable and are presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as long-term debt. At April 30, 2012 and 2011, the gross amount of equipment and related accumulated amortization recorded under capital leases were as follows:
 
2012
2011
Information technology equipment
$
121,000

$
52,000

Less accumulated amortization
(46,000
)
(16,000
)
 
$
75,000

$
36,000


Amortization of assets held under capital lease is included with depreciation expense.

As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments to various parties. Some of these contractual obligations are not reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets due to the nature of the obligations. Such obligations include operating leases for production space and for equipment. On July 30, 2010, we entered into a real estate lease agreement with 96-OP Prop, LLC to lease approximately 18,000 square feet for manufacturing injection molded products, electromechanical assemblies, and larger transformers.  This agreement commenced on September 1, 2010 and continues through February 28, 2014.  The lease agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 4, 2010.

Minimum rent payments under operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease including any periods free of rent. Total rent expense for all operating leases for the years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 was $229,000 and $124,000, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year) and future minimum capital lease payments as of April 30, 2012 are:
Year Ending April 30,
Capital
Leases
Operating
Leases
2013
$
44,000

$
154,000

2014
28,000

112,000

2015
4,000

—

 
$
76,000

$
266,000


The future minimum capital lease payments of $76,000 include amounts representing interest of $1,000 which results in a present value of $75,000 for net minimum capital lease payments.



NOTE 6—EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PLANS

Short-term Cash Incentive Plan

The Short-term Cash Incentive Plan ("STIP") became effective for fiscal year 2008. The purpose of the STIP is to promote the long-term financial performance of Torotel by providing key employees with the opportunity to earn cash awards for accomplishing annual goals for Return on Capital Employed ("ROCE") as defined in the Plan, which was filed as Exhibit 10.8 of Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, and is herein incorporated by reference. There were no awards for the years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011.

Long-term Incentive Plans

The Long-term Incentive Plans ("LTIPs"), which consist of a Stock Award Plan and a Long-term Cash Incentive Plan, also became effective for fiscal year 2008. The purpose of the LTIPs is to provide incentives that will attract and retain highly competent persons as key employees to promote the long-term financial performance of Torotel by providing key employees an opportunity to earn stock and cash awards for accomplishing long-range goals for sales growth, earnings growth, ROCE and debt


to equity, as defined and measured in the Stock Award Plan and the Long-term Cash Incentive Plan, which were filed as Exhibits 10.9 and 10.10 of Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, and are herein incorporated by reference.

Stock Award Plan

The Stock Award Plan ("SAP"), which did not require shareholder approval, provides key employees the opportunity to acquire common stock of Torotel pursuant to awards earned for accomplishing goals that promote the long-term financial performance of Torotel. Under the terms of the SAP, stock awards are in the form of restricted stock having a 5-year restriction period, which shall lapse, based on certain conditions as outlined in the SAP. All stock awards are represented by a Restricted Stock Agreement, which afford the grantees all of the rights of a stockholder with respect to the award shares, including the right to vote such shares and to receive dividends and other distributions payable with respect to such shares since the Date of Award.

Long-term Cash Incentive Plan

The Long-term Cash Incentive Plan ("LTCIP") provides key employees with the opportunity to earn cash awards for accomplishing plan goals based on predetermined targets for average annual sales and earnings growth, ROCE and debt to equity. Under the terms of the LTCIP, awards will not be paid if Torotel's performance on any LTCIP metric is less than the threshold level of performance defined for that LTCIP metric. There were no LTCIP awards for the years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011.

401(k) Retirement Plan

We have a 401(k) Retirement Plan for Torotel Products' employees. Employer contributions to the Plan are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Employer contributions to the Plan for the years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 were $10,000 and $5,000, respectively.



NOTE 7—RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENTS

Restricted Stock Agreements are authorized by the Compensation and Nominating Committee ("Committee") and the Board of Directors of Torotel. The Committee and the Board have determined that the interests of Torotel and its stockholders will be promoted by hiring talented individuals and, to induce such individuals to accept employment with Torotel, the Committee and the Board believe a key component of such individuals' compensation should be granting equity ownership opportunities based upon the acceptance of employment and the continuing employment of such individual, subject to certain conditions and restrictions. The Restricted Stock Agreements afford the grantees all of the rights of a stockholder with respect to the award shares, including the right to vote such shares and to receive dividends and other distributions payable with respect to such shares since the Date of Award. Under the terms of each agreement, the non-vested shares are restricted as to disposition and subject to forfeiture under certain circumstances. The agreements further provide, subject to certain conditions, that if prior to all of the restricted shares having been released, we undergo a change in control, then all of the restricted shares shall be released and no longer subject to restrictions under the agreements.The restricted shares are treated as non-vested stock; accordingly, the fair value of the restricted stock at the date of award is offset against capital in excess of par value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets under stockholders' equity.

We executed Restricted Stock Agreements dated August 7, 2007, with eight key employees pursuant to the Stock Award Plan ("SAP"). The SAP provided key employees the opportunity to acquire newly issued common stock of Torotel pursuant to awards earned for accomplishing goals that promote the long-term financial performance of our business. The terms of the SAP, were filed as Exhibit 10.9 of Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007. These were newly issued shares from the number of authorized shares remaining to be issued. Stock compensation cost for the existing restricted stock awards, net of an appropriate pre-vesting forfeiture rate, was recorded per quarter during the remaining vesting period during which the financial performance metrics as outlined in the Restricted Stock Agreement were anticipated as likely to be attained. However, due to the mid-year projections developed in the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, the likelihood of achieving the financial performance metrics as outlined in the Restricted Stock Agreement was classified as remote. As a result, we stopped amortizing the stock compensation cost associated with the restricted stock awarded on August 7, 2007 and recovered the previously amortized stock compensation cost of $117,000 in the second quarter ended October 31, 2011. The remaining outstanding shares associated with the restricted stock awards dated August 7, 2007, were forfeited by the employees in accordance with the SAP, and were converted to treasury shares on January 27, 2012. The forfeiture is summarized in the table below.

On September 2, 2009, we entered into Restricted Stock Agreements with two key employees (Messrs. Sizemore and Serrone) pursuant to the SAP. The aggregate amount of the restricted stock awards was 250,000 shares of common stock, $0.01


par value per share. These shares were transferred from treasury shares. Based on the market price of $0.27 for our common stock as of September 2, 2009, the fair value of the restricted stock at the date of award was $67,500. Stock compensation cost net of an appropriate pre-vesting forfeiture rate is recorded per quarter for the remainder of the vesting period provided the financial performance metrics as outlined in the SAP are likely to be attained.

Total stock compensation cost for the years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 was a credit of $106,000 and an expense of $55,000, respectively. Restricted stock activity for each period through April 30 is summarized as follows:

 
2012
2011
 
Restricted
Shares
Under
Option
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
Restricted
Shares
Under
Option
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
Outstanding at May 1
562,900

$
0.398

607,350

$
0.405

Granted
—

—

—

—

Vested
—

—

—

—

Forfeited
(312,900
)
0.500

(44,450
)
0.500

Outstanding at April 30
250,000

$
0.270

562,900

$
0.398




NOTE 8—STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

The changes in shares of common stock outstanding as of April 30 of each year are summarized as follows:

 
2012
2011
Balance, May 1
5,828,650

5,873,100

Restricted stock activity
(312,900
)
—

Treasury stock activity
—

(44,450
)
Balance, April 30
5,515,750

5,828,650



NOTE 9—EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines net income per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Per share amounts are computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during each period.

The basic earnings per common share were computed as follows:

 
2012
2011
Net earnings
$
(16,000
)
$
1,256,000

Amounts allocated to participating securities (nonvested restricted shares)
—

126,000

Net income attributable to common shareholders 
$
(16,000
)
$
1,130,000

Basic weighted average common shares
5,265,750

5,262,740

Earnings per share attributable to common shareholders:
 

 
Basic earnings per share
$
—

$
0.21


ASC 260, Earnings per Share, provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered to be participating securities and must be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  Diluted earnings per share is not presented as we do not have any shares considered incremental and dilutive.

NOTE 10—ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities as of April 30 of each year consist of the following:

 
2012
2011
Employee related expenses:
 
 
Accrued payroll
$
111,000

$
110,000

Accrued payroll taxes
42,000

40,000

Accrued employee benefits
43,000

28,000

 
196,000

178,000

Other, including interest:
 
 
Warranty reserve
20,000

36,000

Property taxes
12,000

24,000

Deferred director compensation
52,000

80,000

Other
1,000

18,000

 
85,000

158,000

 
$
281,000

$
336,000



NOTE 11—INFORMATION ABOUT MAJOR CUSTOMERS

Sales to one major customer as a percentage of consolidated net sales as of April 30 of each year was the following:


2012
2011
Sales to a major customer as a % of net sales
51
%
43
%



NOTE 12—STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

The board of directors of Torotel approved the Directors Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (the "Plan") for non-employee directors in September 2004. This plan was filed as Exhibit 10.4 of the form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004.

Each SAR granted as a part of the plan may be exercised to the extent that the Grantee is vested in such SAR. The SARs will vest according to the following schedule:
Number of Years the Grantee has remained
a Torotel director following the Date of Grant
Shares represented
by a SAR in which
a Grantee is Vested
Under one
—
%
At least one but less than two
33
%
At least two but less than three
67
%
Three or more
100
%


A Grantee shall become fully vested in each of his or her SARs under the following circumstances: (i) upon termination of the Grantee's service as a director of Torotel for reasons of death, disability or retirement; (ii) if the Compensation and Nominating Committee (the "Committee"), in its sole discretion, determines that acceleration of the SAR vesting schedule would be desirable for Torotel; or (iii) if Torotel shall, pursuant to action by its Board of Directors, at any time propose to merge into, consolidate with, or sell or otherwise transfer all or substantially all of its assets to another corporation, and provision is not made pursuant to the terms of such transaction for the assumption by the surviving, resulting or acquiring corporation of outstanding SARs or for substitution of new SARs therefore, the Committee shall cause written notice of the proposed transaction to be given to each


Grantee not less than twenty days prior to the anticipated effective date of the proposed transaction, and his or her SARs shall become fully vested and, prior to a date specified in such notice, which shall be not more than ten days prior to the anticipated effective date of the proposed transaction, each Grantee shall have the right to exercise his or her SARs.

In accordance with ASC 718, compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period based upon the estimated fair value of the SARs pursuant to the terms of the Plan using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model as of the end of each financial reporting period. The stock volatility rate was determined using the historical volatility rates of our common stock based on the weekly closing price of our stock. The expected life represents the actual life as well as the use of the simplified method prescribed by the SEC, which uses the average of the vesting period and expiration period of each group of SARs. The interest rates used were the government Treasury bill rate on the date of valuation. Dividend yield was based on the historical policy that we have not issued any form of dividend since 1985. 

SARs transactions for each period though April 30 are summarized as follows:
 
2012
2011
 
SARs
Under
Option
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
SARs
Under
Option
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
Outstanding at beginning of year
240,000

$
0.407

240,000

$
0.418

Granted
40,000

$
0.558

40,000

$
0.300

Exercised
—

$
—

(20,000
)
$
0.425

Forfeited
—

$
—

(20,000
)
$
0.310

Outstanding at end of year
280,000

$
0.429

240,000

$
0.407

SARs exercisable at end of year
210,000

$
0.439

180,000

$
0.439

Weighted average fair value of SARs granted during the year
 

$
0.256

 

$
0.560


The following information applies to SARs outstanding for each year through April 30:

 
2012
2011
Number outstanding
280,000

240,000

Range of grant prices, upper limit
$
0.695

$
0.695

Range of grant prices, lower limit
$
0.208

$
0.208

Weighted average grant price
$
0.429

$
0.407

Weighted average contractual life remaining (in years)
5.28

5.67

10-day average market price
$
0.270

$
0.560

Weighted average stock volatility
135.82
%
133.90
%
Weighted average expected life
4.86

3.00

Weighted average risk free rate
0.95
%
2.17
%
Weighted average dividend yield
—
%
—
%
Weighted average fair value price
$
0.278

$
0.444

Total vested SARs
210,000

180,000

Weighted average aggregate fair value
$
6,650

$
16,780

Weighted average aggregate intrinsic value
$
220

$
6,605

Total compensation expense (benefit)
$
(28,000
)
$
52,000

Unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested SARs granted
$
9,000

$
28,000

Expected period to recognize compensation expense related to non-vested SARs granted (in years)
1.90

1.43

Total liability for SARs on consolidated balance sheets
$
52,000

$
80,000




NOTE 13—AGREEMENTS WITH RELATED PARTY

Electronika's requirements for the ballast transformers are outsourced pursuant to a Manufacturing Agreement (“Agreement”) with Magnetika, a corporation owned by the Caloyeras family. Under the terms of the Agreement, Magnetika provides all necessary raw material, labor, testing, packaging and related services required to complete the manufacture, delivery and sale of the ballast transformers, and Electronika is obligated to order all of its ballast transformer requirements exclusively from Magnetika. Electronika retains ownership of all designs, drawings, specifications and intellectual property rights associated with the ballast transformers. In exchange for the services provided to Electronika under the Agreement, Magnetika receives 40% of the net sales price of all ballast transformers sold by Electronika. The initial 10 year term of the Agreement expired on April 1, 2012; however, pursuant to the terms, the Agreement continues on a year-to-year basis until cancelled by either party. In the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, Electronika incurred costs of $8,000 for goods purchased on trade terms of net 20 days pursuant to the Agreement. Of the amount purchased, $1,000 was due and payable as of April 30, 2012. In the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011, Electronika incurred costs of $21,000 for goods purchased. Of the amount purchased, $5,000 was due and payable as of April 30, 2011.



NOTE 14—CUSTOMER DEPOSITS

The contract for the potted coil assembly, dated March 7, 2012, provides for milestone payments in the aggregate amount of $1,400,000 to be paid by the customer. This aggregate amount will be used to procure raw materials and to establish a 500-piece finished goods buffer. These milestone payments will be recovered by the customer ratably over the course of the contract as invoices are paid. As of April 30, 2012, we had not yet received any milestone payments associated with this new contract. In accordance with its revenue recognition policy, we will recognize revenue on this contract upon monthly shipment of the product.

Torotel received milestone payments in the aggregate amount of $1,337,000 from the previous contract for the potted coil assembly, which had its final shipments made in April 2012. Our liability for unrecovered milestone payments associated with this contract was $116,000. This net amount is reflected as a customer deposit under current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of April 30, 2012.

For certain customers, we collect payment of the shipment at the time the order is placed. These deposits are classified as a liability and will be recognized as revenue at the time of shipment in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. As of April 30, 2012 we had approximately $90,000 in customer deposits related to this arrangement.


NOTE 15—ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RECOVERABILITY

We have determined that the enterprise resource management system (the “ERP system”) implemented in November 2010 is not appropriate for long-term use based on certain functionalities not performing as promised. After discussions with the ERP system provider, we received a partial refund of $40,000 subsequent to April 30, 2011, that was applied to the carrying amount of the software. Subsequent to the change in carrying amount, we evaluated the asset for existence of impairment. After determining that impairment indicators exist (the discontinuation of the ERP system will more likely than not occur prior to the end of its useful life), we evaluated recoverability by comparing undiscounted cash flows provided by the ERP system to the carrying value of the asset. Since the ERP system is integral to the operations of our business, entity level cash flows were used in this test. We are expected to generate undiscounted cash flows in excess of the carrying amount of the software so no impairment loss adjustment is necessary. We anticipate that a new ERP system will be implemented on November 1, 2012.


NOTE 16 — OUT OF PERIOD ADJUSTMENT 

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, we discovered errors in our restricted stock accounting that affect fiscal years 2008 to 2011. We incorrectly applied guidance contained in ASC 718 Compensation -Stock Compensation related to the reversal of previously amortized compensation expense at the time of forfeiture (due to employee termination). We also did not apply a pre-vesting forfeiture rate to our stock compensation amortization expense. These errors resulted in an understatement of our net income or overstatement of our net loss in fiscal years 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 that was determined immaterial to our prior year financial statements, as detailed below.

We assessed the materiality of this error on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended April 30, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 99, Materiality and SAB No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements ("SAB 108"), using both the roll-over method and iron-curtain method as defined in SAB 108. Under SAB 108, prior-year misstatements which, if corrected in the current year would be material to the current year, must be corrected by adjusting prior year consolidated financial statements, even though such correction previously was and continues to be immaterial to the prior-year consolidated financial statements. Correcting prior-year consolidated financial statements for such “immaterial errors” does not require our previously filed reports to be amended, but rather these corrections will be made the next time we file the prior-year consolidated financial statements.

The following is a reconciliation between previously reported amounts for net earnings (or loss) and basic earnings (or loss) per share and restated amounts for the periods described above. We have debited paid in capital and credited stock compensation expense for the amounts detailed in the table below.

Fiscal Year Ended April 30,
2011
2010
2009
2008
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss)
 
 
 
 
As reported
$
1,233,000

$
(27,000
)
$
303,000

$
165,000

Adjustments
23,000

23,000

14,000

39,000

Restated
$
1,256,000

$
(4,000
)
$
317,000

$
204,000

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share
 
 
 
 
As reported
$
0.21

$
(0.01
)
$
0.06

$
0.03

Adjustments
—

0.01

—

0.01

Restated
$
0.21

$
—

$
0.06

$
0.04




NOTE 17 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2012, we disclosed that an evaluation of the injection molded products was being undertaken to determine if re-designing the products would enable us improve our position in this market.  Based on this review and subsequent to April 30, 2012, we have decided not to move forward with a re-design and will discontinue production of the injection molded business effective with the conclusion of the existing orders in July 2012.

In conjunction with this decision, we have completed an impairment analysis of the long-term assets associated with the injection molded products.  Based upon this analysis, we have concluded that no impairment adjustment is necessary as of April 30, 2012, or as of the date of this report.  We anticipate that the process of selling the equipment associated with the injection molding business will commence subsequent to the date of this report and prior to the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2013.





PART III


ITEM 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Torotel's 2012 Proxy Statement under the sections titled "Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof", "Proposal One—Election to the Board of Directors" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance", to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of our most recent fiscal year.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Torotel has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code") for directors, executive officers, and significant employees. A copy of the Code is posted on Torotel's Internet website at www.torotelproducts.com. If an amendment is made to, or a waiver granted of, a provision of the Code that applies to Torotel's principal executive officer or principal financial officer where such amendment or waiver is required to be disclosed under applicable SEC rules, Torotel intends to disclose such amendment or waiver and the reasons therefore on its Internet website at www.torotelproducts.com within four business days following any such amendment or waiver and will keep the information available on the website for at least twelve months. Following the twelve-month posting period, the information will be retained for a minimum of five years.


ITEM 11.    Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Torotel's 2012 Proxy Statement under the section titled "Executive Officer Compensation", to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of our most recent fiscal year.


ITEM 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Torotel's 2012 Proxy Statement under the sections titled "Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof" and "Proposal One—Election to the Board of Directors", to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of our most recent fiscal year.



ITEM 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Torotel's 2012 Proxy Statement under the section titled "Certain Relationships and Legal Proceedings", to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of our most recent fiscal year.



ITEM 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Torotel's 2012 Proxy Statement under the section titled "Fees Paid to the Independent Accountants", to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of our most recent fiscal year.





PART IV

ITEM 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)   Exhibits (Electronic Filing Only)

Exhibit 3.1
 
Articles of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 25, 2009)
Exhibit 3.2
 
By-laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 7, 2006)
Exhibit 10.1
 
Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 7, 2006)
Exhibit 10.2
 
Manufacturing Agreement with Magnetika, Inc. (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 8.4 of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 15, 2002)
Exhibit 10.4
 
Directors Stock Appreciation Rights Plan

Exhibit 10.5
 
Short-term Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Form 10-KSB filed with the SEC on July 30, 2007)
Exhibit 10.6
 
Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Form 10-KSB filed with the SEC on July 30, 2007)
Exhibit 10.7
 
Long-term Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Form 10-KSB filed with the SEC on July 30, 2007)
Exhibit 10.8
 
Lease Agreement dated July 30, 2010 by and between 96-OP Prop, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company and Torotel, Inc., a Missouri corporation, for the Company's 18,000 square foot manufacturing facility
Exhibit 10.11
 
Commerce Financing Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on December 15, 2010)
Exhibit 14
 
Code of Ethics for Directors, Executive Officers, Significant Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 of Form 10-KSB filed with the SEC on February 16, 2005)
Exhibit 21
 
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Exhibit 31.1
 
Officer Certification
Exhibit 31.2
 
Officer Certification
Exhibit 32.1
 
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2
 
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

By:
/s/ DALE H. SIZEMORE, JR.
By:
/s/ H. JAMES SERRONE
 
Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
 
H. James Serrone
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:  
July 24, 2012
 
Date:  
July 24, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:
/s/ DALE H. SIZEMORE, JR.
By:
/s/ ANTHONY L. LEWIS
 
Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.
Chairman of the Board, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
Anthony L. Lewis
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:  
July 24, 2012
 
Date: 
July 24, 2012


By:
/s/ RICHARD A. SIZEMORE
By:
/s/ STEPHEN K. SWINSON
 
Richard A. Sizemore
Director
 
Stephen K. Swinson
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:  
July 24, 2012
 
Date:  
July 24, 2012


By:
/s/ BARRY B. HENDRIX
 
 
 
Barry B. Hendrix
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
July 24, 2012