10-Q 1 a10q2q13.htm
 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

  FORM 10-Q

 

 Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2013

Commission file number: 1-10853

 

BB&T CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

 

   
North Carolina 56-0939887
(State of Incorporation)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

   
200 West Second Street 27101

Winston-Salem, North Carolina

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

(336) 733-2000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  [X]   No  [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  [X]   No  [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer X     Accelerated filer  
         
Non-accelerated filer    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company  

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes  [  ]   No  [X]

At July 31, 2013, 703,868,650 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $5 par value, were outstanding.

 

 

 
 
 

 

BB&T CORPORATION  
FORM 10-Q  
June 30, 2013  
INDEX  
       
    Page No.  
PART I    
Item 1. Financial Statements    
  Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) 5  
  Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) 6  
  Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) 7  
  Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited) 8  
  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) 9  
  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) 10    
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 47    
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (see Market Risk Management) 81   
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 81   
PART II    
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 82   
Item 1A. Risk Factors 82   
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 82   
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities - (not applicable.)    
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures - (not applicable.)    
Item 5. Other Information - (none to be reported.)    
Item 6. Exhibits 82   
2

Glossary of Defined Terms

The following terms may be used throughout this Report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes.

 

Term   Definition
2004 Plan   2004 Stock Incentive Plan
2006 Repurchase Plan   Plan for the repurchase of up to 50 million shares of BB&T’s common stock
2012 Plan   2012 Incentive Plan
ADC   Acquisition, development and construction
ACL   Allowance for credit losses
AFS   Available-for-sale
ALLL   Allowance for loan and lease losses
AOCI   Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
BankAtlantic   BankAtlantic, a federal savings association acquired by BB&T from BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
Basel III   Global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity published by the BCBS
BB&T   BB&T Corporation and subsidiaries
BCBS   Basel Committee on Bank Supervision
BHC   Bank holding company
BHCA   Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended
Branch Bank   Branch Banking and Trust Company
CCAR   Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
CD   Certificate of deposit
CDI   Core deposit intangible assets
CFPB   Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Colonial   Collectively, certain assets and liabilities of Colonial Bank acquired by BB&T in 2009
Company   BB&T Corporation and subsidiaries (interchangeable with "BB&T" above)
Council   Financial Stability Oversight Council
CRA   Community Reinvestment Act of 1977
CRE   Commercial real estate
Crump Insurance   The life and property and casualty insurance operations acquired from the Crump Group
DIF   Deposit Insurance Fund administered by the FDIC
Directors’ Plan   Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan
Dodd-Frank Act   Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EPS   Earnings per common share
EU   European Union
EVE   Economic value of equity
Exchange Act   Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB   Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC   Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHA   Federal Housing Administration
FHLB   Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC   Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FINRA   Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
FNMA   Federal National Mortgage Association
FRB   Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
FTE   Fully taxable-equivalent
FTP   Funds transfer pricing
GAAP   Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
GNMA   Government National Mortgage Association
Grandbridge   Grandbridge Real Estate Capital, LLC
GSE   U.S. government-sponsored enterprise
HTM   Held-to-maturity
IMLAFA   International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001
IPV   Independent price verification
IRS   Internal Revenue Service
ISDA   International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
LHFS   Loans held for sale
3

 

LIBOR   London Interbank Offered Rate
LOB   Line of business
MRLCC   Market Risk, Liquidity and Capital Committee
MSR   Mortgage servicing right
MSRB   Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
NIM   Net interest margin
NPA   Nonperforming asset
NPL   Nonperforming loan
NPR   Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NYSE   NYSE Euronext, Inc.
OAS   Option adjusted spread
OCC   Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI   Other comprehensive income (loss)
Omnibus Plan   1995 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan
OREO   Other real estate owned
OTS   Office of Thrift Supervision
OTTI   Other-than-temporary impairment
Parent Company   BB&T Corporation, the parent company of Branch Bank and other subsidiaries
Patriot Act   Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001
Peer Group   Financial holding companies included in the industry peer group index
Reform Act   Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005
RMBS   Residential mortgage-backed securities
RMO   Risk Management Organization
RSU   Restricted stock unit
RUFC   Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
S&P   Standard & Poor's
SBIC   Small Business Investment Company
SCAP   Supervisory Capital Assessment Program
SEC   Securities and Exchange Commission
Short Term Borrowings   Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowed funds with original maturities of less than one year
Simulation   Interest sensitivity simulation analysis
TBA   To be announced
TDR   Troubled debt restructuring
U.S.   United States of America
U.S. Treasury   United States Department of the Treasury
UPB   Unpaid principal balance
VA   U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
VaR   Value-at-risk
VIE   Variable interest entity
4

 

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS  
(Unaudited)  
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)  
                     
          June 30,   December 31,  
          2013   2012  
Assets            
  Cash and due from banks $  1,444    $  1,975   
  Interest-bearing deposits with banks    740       942   
  Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements or similar            
    arrangements    195       122   
  Restricted cash    585       750   
  Trading securities at fair value    537       497   
  AFS securities at fair value ($1,515 and $1,591 covered by FDIC loss            
    share at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)    24,477       25,137   
  HTM securities (fair value of $13,445 and $13,848 at June 30, 2013            
     and December 31, 2012, respectively)    13,751       13,594   
  LHFS at fair value    2,488       3,761   
  Loans and leases ($2,749 and $3,294 covered by FDIC loss share at June 30,            
    2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)    115,794       114,603   
  ALLL    (1,901)      (2,018)  
    Loans and leases, net of ALLL    113,893       112,585   
                     
  FDIC loss share receivable    299       479   
  Premises and equipment    1,893       1,888   
  Goodwill    6,824       6,804   
  Core deposit and other intangible assets    620       673   
  Residential MSRs at fair value    892       627   
  Other assets ($221 and $297 of foreclosed property and other assets covered by FDIC            
    loss share at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)    14,097       14,038   
      Total assets $  182,735    $  183,872   
                     
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity            
  Deposits:            
    Noninterest-bearing deposits $  33,760    $  32,452   
    Interest-bearing deposits    97,319       100,623   
      Total deposits    131,079       133,075   
                     
  Short-term borrowings    3,192       2,864   
  Long-term debt    19,362       19,114   
  Accounts payable and other liabilities    7,106       7,596   
      Total liabilities    160,739       162,649   
                     
  Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)            
  Shareholders’ equity:            
    Preferred stock, $5 par, liquidation preference of $25,000 per share    2,603       2,116   
    Common stock, $5 par    3,515       3,499   
    Additional paid-in capital    6,042       5,973   
    Retained earnings    10,564       10,129   
    AOCI, net of deferred income taxes    (784)      (559)  
    Noncontrolling interests    56       65   
      Total shareholders’ equity    21,996       21,223   
      Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $  182,735    $  183,872   
                     
  Common shares outstanding    702,995       699,728   
  Common shares authorized    2,000,000       2,000,000   
  Preferred shares outstanding    107       87   
  Preferred shares authorized    5,000       5,000   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

 

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME  
(Unaudited)  
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)  
                                   
            Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
              June 30,     June 30,  
              2013      2012      2013      2012   
Interest Income                        
  Interest and fees on loans and leases $  1,418    $  1,492    $  2,851    $  2,994   
  Interest and dividends on securities    215       230       430       464   
  Interest on other earning assets    10       6       21       13   
      Total interest income    1,643       1,728       3,302       3,471   
Interest Expense                        
  Interest on deposits    78       107       164       228   
  Interest on short-term borrowings    3       2       4       3   
  Interest on long-term debt    147       157       297       342   
      Total interest expense    228       266       465       573   
Net Interest Income    1,415       1,462       2,837       2,898   
  Provision for credit losses    168       273       440       561   
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses    1,247       1,189       2,397       2,337   
Noninterest Income                        
  Insurance income    426       393       791       664   
  Mortgage banking income    168       182       348       398   
  Service charges on deposits    143       138       281       275   
  Investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions    99       88       193       177   
  Bankcard fees and merchant discounts    65       59       124       113   
  Checkcard fees    51       45       98       88   
  Trust and investment advisory revenues    49       46       97       91   
  Income from bank-owned life insurance    26       27       54       57   
  FDIC loss share income, net    (85)      (74)      (144)      (131)  
  Other income    81       64       159       116   
  Securities gains (losses), net                        
      Realized gains (losses), net    23       ―         46       (4)  
      OTTI charges    ―         (2)      ―         (5)  
      Non-credit portion recognized in OCI    ―         ―         ―         (2)  
          Total securities gains (losses), net    23       (2)      46       (11)  
      Total noninterest income    1,046       966       2,047       1,837   
Noninterest Expense                        
  Personnel expense    844       775       1,661       1,505   
  Occupancy and equipment expense    170       159       341       312   
  Loan-related expense    63       62       121       125   
  Foreclosed property expense    12       72       30       164   
  Regulatory charges    35       43       70       84   
  Professional services    47       39       83       74   
  Software expense    38       32       76       64   
  Amortization of intangibles    27       29       54       51   
  Merger-related and restructuring charges, net    27       2       32       14   
  Other expense    233       213       442       418   
      Total noninterest expense    1,496       1,426       2,910       2,811   
Earnings                        
  Income before income taxes    797       729       1,534       1,363   
  Provision for income taxes    221       191       702       380   
      Net income    576       538       832       983   
  Noncontrolling interests    16       20       32       34   
  Dividends on preferred stock    13       8       43       8   
      Net income available to common shareholders $  547    $  510    $  757    $  941   
EPS                        
      Basic $  0.78    $  0.73    $  1.08    $  1.35   
      Diluted $  0.77    $  0.72    $  1.06    $  1.33   
  Cash dividends declared $  0.23    $  0.20    $  0.46    $  0.40   
                                   
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                        
      Basic    702,082       698,579       701,245       698,132   
      Diluted    712,861       708,454       711,998       707,990   

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

6

 

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME  
(Unaudited)  
(Dollars in millions)  
                                 
          Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
          June 30,   June 30,  
          2013   2012   2013   2012  
                                 
Net Income $  576    $  538    $  832    $  983   
OCI, net of tax:                        
  Change in unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs    12       11       26       22   
  Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges    155       (16)      162       (15)  
  Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities    (354)      67       (415)      192   
  Change in FDIC's share of unrealized (gains) losses on AFS securities    17       14       4       (28)  
  Other, net    (2)      (1)      (2)      1   
    Total OCI    (172)      75       (225)      172   
    Total comprehensive income $  404    $  613    $  607    $  1,155   
                                 
                                 
Income Tax Effect of Items Included in OCI:  
  Change in unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs $  8    $  7    $  17    $  14   
  Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges    95       (10)      98       (10)  
  Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities    (215)      39       (252)      116   
  Change in FDIC's share of unrealized (gains) losses on AFS securities    10       8       1       (18)  
  Other, net    1       1       1       1   

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

 

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
(Unaudited)  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012  
(Dollars in millions, shares in thousands)  
                                                       
                                                     
          Shares of               Additional                   Total  
          Common   Preferred   Common   Paid-In   Retained       Noncontrolling   Shareholders’  
          Stock   Stock   Stock   Capital   Earnings   AOCI   Interests   Equity  
Balance, January 1, 2012  697,143    $  ―      $  3,486    $  5,873    $  8,772    $  (713)   $  62    $  17,480   
Add (Deduct):                                              
  Net income  ―         ―         ―         ―         949       ―         34       983   
  Net change in OCI  ―         ―         ―         ―         ―         172       ―         172   
  Stock transactions:                                              
    In purchase acquisitions  28       ―         ―         1       ―         ―         ―         1   
    In connection with equity awards  2,158       ―         11       2       ―         ―         ―         13   
    Shares repurchased in connection with equity awards  (534)      ―         (3)      (13)      ―         ―         ―         (16)  
    In connection with preferred stock offering  ―         559       ―         ―         ―         ―         ―         559   
  Cash dividends declared on common stock  ―         ―         ―         ―         (280)      ―         ―         (280)  
  Cash dividends declared on preferred stock                          (8)                  (8)  
  Equity-based compensation expense  ―         ―         ―         51       ―         ―         ―         51   
  Other, net  ―         ―         ―         ―         ―         ―         (29)      (29)  
Balance, June 30, 2012  698,795    $  559    $  3,494    $  5,914    $  9,433    $  (541)   $  67    $  18,926   
                                                       
Balance, January 1, 2013  699,728    $  2,116    $  3,499    $  5,973    $  10,129    $  (559)   $  65    $  21,223   
Add (Deduct):                                              
  Net income  ―         ―         ―         ―         800       ―         32       832   
  Net change in OCI  ―         ―         ―         ―         ―         (225)      ―         (225)  
  Stock transactions:                                              
    In connection with equity awards  3,462       ―         17       12       ―         ―         ―         29   
    Shares repurchased in connection with equity awards  (754)      ―         (4)      (19)      ―         ―         ―         (23)  
    In connection with dividend reinvestment plan  229       ―         1       6       ―         ―         ―         7   
    In connection with 401(k) plan  330       ―         2       9       ―         ―         ―         11   
    In connection with preferred stock offering  ―         487       ―         ―         ―         ―         ―         487   
  Cash dividends declared on common stock  ―         ―         ―         ―         (322)      ―         ―         (322)  
  Cash dividends declared on preferred stock  ―         ―         ―         ―         (43)      ―         ―         (43)  
  Equity-based compensation expense  ―         ―         ―         60       ―         ―         ―         60   
  Other, net  ―         ―         ―         1       ―         ―         (41)      (40)  
Balance, June 30, 2013  702,995    $  2,603    $  3,515    $  6,042    $  10,564    $  (784)   $  56    $  21,996   

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

8

 

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  
(Unaudited)  
(Dollars in millions)  
              Six Months Ended  
              June 30,  
              2013   2012  
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:            
  Net income $  832    $  983   
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:            
    Provision for credit losses    440       561   
    Depreciation    153       131   
    Amortization of intangibles    54       51   
    Equity-based compensation    60       51   
    (Gain) loss on securities, net    (46)      11   
    Net write-downs/losses on foreclosed property    11       120   
    Net change in operating assets and liabilities:            
      LHFS    1,299       579   
      FDIC loss share receivable    203       269   
      Other assets    (421)      (677)  
      Accounts payable and other liabilities    (228)      699   
    Other, net    (49)      (159)  
        Net cash from operating activities    2,308       2,619   
                         
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:            
  Proceeds from sales of AFS securities    931       153   
  Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of AFS securities    3,408       1,782   
  Purchases of AFS securities    (4,371)      (4,400)  
  Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of HTM securities    2,076       2,138   
  Purchases of HTM securities    (2,251)      (619)  
  Originations and purchases of loans and leases, net of principal collected    (2,002)      (4,115)  
  Net cash for acquisitions    (6)      (555)  
  Purchases of premises and equipment    (165)      (61)  
  Proceeds from sales of foreclosed property    191       494   
  Other, net    398       (36)  
        Net cash from investing activities    (1,791)      (5,219)  
                         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:            
  Net change in deposits    (1,996)      1,120   
  Net change in short-term borrowings    328       (370)  
  Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt    1,140       1,072   
  Repayment of long-term debt    (773)      (197)  
  Net cash from preferred stock transactions    487       559   
  Cash dividends paid on common stock    (455)      (251)  
  Cash dividends paid on preferred stock    (73)      ―     
  Other, net    165       54   
        Net cash from financing activities    (1,177)      1,987   
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents    (660)      (613)  
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period    3,039       3,576   
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $  2,379    $  2,963   
                         
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:            
  Cash paid (received) during the period for:            
    Interest $  483    $  579   
    Income taxes    369       317   
  Noncash investing activities:            
    Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets    269       372   

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

9

NOTE 1. Basis of Presentation

 

See the Glossary of Defined Terms at the beginning of this Report for terms used throughout the consolidated financial statements and related notes of this Form 10-Q.

 

General

 

These consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flow activity required in accordance with GAAP. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations have been made. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The information contained in the financial statements and footnotes included in BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 should be referred to in connection with these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

 

Reclassifications

 

In certain instances, amounts reported in prior periods’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported cash flows, shareholders’ equity or net income.

 

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the ACL, determination of fair value for financial instruments, valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and other purchase accounting related adjustments, benefit plan obligations and expenses, and tax assets, liabilities and expense.

 

Changes in Accounting Principles and Effects of New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2013, the FASB issued new guidance related to Investment Companies. The new guidance amends the criteria for an entity to qualify as an investment company and requires an investment company to measure all of its investments at fair value. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to be material to BB&T’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance impacting the presentation of certain items on the Balance Sheet. The new guidance requires an entity to disclose both gross and net information about derivatives, repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending transactions that have a right of setoff or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The adoption of this guidance did not impact BB&T’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The new disclosures required by this guidance for derivatives are included in Note 14 to these consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our disclosures of repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending transactions as the balances and volume of transactions are not material.

 

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance on Business Combinations. The new guidance clarifies that when a reporting entity recognizes an indemnification asset as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution and subsequently a change in the cash flows expected to be collected on the indemnification asset occurs, the reporting entity should account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the lesser of the contractual term of the indemnification agreement or the remaining life of the indemnified assets. BB&T has previously accounted for its indemnification asset in accordance with this guidance; accordingly, the adoption of this guidance had no impact on BB&T’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance impacting Comprehensive Income that requires a reporting entity to present significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income. The adoption of this guidance did not impact BB&T’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The new disclosures required by this guidance are included in Note 9 to these consolidated financial statements.

10

NOTE 2. Securities

 

          Amortized   Gross Unrealized   Fair  
  June 30, 2013   Cost   Gains   Losses   Value  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  AFS securities:                          
    GSE securities   $  441    $  —      $  —      $  441   
    RMBS issued by GSE      20,473       142       272       20,343   
    States and political subdivisions      1,901       81       94       1,888   
    Non-agency RMBS      284       11       10       285   
    Other securities      5       —         —         5   
    Covered securities      1,080       435       —         1,515   
      Total AFS securities   $  24,184    $  669    $  376    $  24,477   
                                 
  HTM securities:                          
    GSE securities   $  5,200    $  —      $  272    $  4,928   
    RMBS issued by GSE      8,059       27       68       8,018   
    States and political subdivisions      33       1       —         34   
    Other securities      459       6       —         465   
      Total HTM securities   $  13,751    $  34    $  340    $  13,445   

 

          Amortized   Gross Unrealized   Fair  
  December 31, 2012   Cost   Gains   Losses   Value  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  AFS securities:                          
    GSE securities   $  290    $  —      $  —      $  290   
    RMBS issued by GSE      20,482       466       18       20,930   
    States and political subdivisions      1,948       153       90       2,011   
    Non-agency RMBS      307       16       11       312   
    Other securities      3       —         —         3   
    Covered securities      1,147       444       —         1,591   
      Total AFS securities   $  24,177    $  1,079    $  119    $  25,137   
                                 
  HTM securities:                          
    GSE securities   $  3,808    $  17    $  1    $  3,824   
    RMBS issued by GSE      9,273       238       1       9,510   
    States and political subdivisions      34       1       1       34   
    Other securities      479       4       3       480   
      Total HTM securities   $  13,594    $  260    $  6    $  13,848   

 

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of covered securities included $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, of non-agency RMBS and $316 million and $326 million, respectively, of municipal securities.

 

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, securities with carrying values of approximately $18.3 billion and $19.0 billion, respectively, were pledged to secure municipal deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings, and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

 

BB&T had certain investments in marketable debt securities and RMBS issued by FNMA and FHLMC that exceeded ten percent of shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2013. The FNMA investments had total amortized cost and fair value of $14.2 billion and $13.9 billion, respectively. The FHLMC investments had total amortized cost and fair value of $7.8 billion and $7.7 billion, respectively.

 

11

 

The gross realized gains and losses on securities are reflected in the following table:
                                 
          Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
          June 30,   June 30,  
            2013     2012     2013     2012  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Gross gains $  23    $  ―      $  46    $  ―     
  Gross losses    ―         ―         ―         (4)  
  Net realized gains (losses) $  23    $  ―      $  46    $  (4)  

 

The following table reflects changes in credit losses on securities with OTTI (excluding covered), which were primarily non-agency RMBS, where a portion of the unrealized loss was recognized in OCI. OTTI of $4 million related to covered securities during 2012 is not reflected in this table.

 

          Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
          June 30,   June 30,  
            2013     2012     2013     2012  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Balance at beginning of period $  101    $  114    $  105    $  129   
  Credit losses on securities with previously recognized OTTI    ―         2       ―         3   
  Reductions for securities sold/settled during the period    (5)      (4)      (9)      (20)  
  Balance at end of period $  96    $  112    $  96    $  112   

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the securities portfolio by contractual maturity are shown in the following table. The expected life of RMBS may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay the underlying mortgage loans with or without prepayment penalties.

 

          AFS   HTM  
          Amortized   Fair   Amortized   Fair  
  June 30, 2013   Cost   Value   Cost   Value  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Due in one year or less   $  259    $  259    $  ―      $  ―     
  Due after one year through five years      305       312       ―         ―     
  Due after five years through ten years      536       555       4,555       4,326   
  Due after ten years      23,084       23,351       9,196       9,119   
    Total debt securities   $  24,184    $  24,477    $  13,751    $  13,445   

 

The following tables present the fair values and gross unrealized losses of BB&T’s investments based on the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
                                               
            Less than 12 months   12 months or more   Total  
            Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized  
  June 30, 2013   Value   Losses   Value   Losses   Value   Losses  
                                               
            (Dollars in millions)  
  AFS securities:                                      
    RMBS issued by GSE   $  11,392    $  272    $  1    $  —      $  11,393    $  272   
    States and political subdivisions      239       9       423       85       662       94   
    Non-agency RMBS      —         —         105       10       105       10   
      Total   $  11,631    $  281    $  529    $  95    $  12,160    $  376   
                                               
  HTM securities:                                      
    GSE securities   $  4,812    $  272    $  —      $  —      $  4,812    $  272   
    RMBS issued by GSE      5,966       68       48       —         6,014       68   
      Total   $  10,778    $  340    $  48    $  —      $  10,826    $  340   

 

12

 

            Less than 12 months   12 months or more   Total  
            Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized  
  December 31, 2012   Value   Losses   Value   Losses   Value   Losses  
                                               
            (Dollars in millions)  
  AFS securities:                                      
    RMBS issued by GSE   $  2,662    $  18    $  —      $  —      $  2,662    $  18   
    States and political subdivisions      52       1       478       89       530       90   
    Non-agency RMBS      —         —         113       11       113       11   
      Total   $  2,714    $  19    $  591    $  100    $  3,305    $  119   
                                               
  HTM securities:                                      
    GSE securities   $  805    $  1    $  —      $  —      $  805    $  1   
    RMBS issued by GSE      593       1       —         —         593       1   
    States and political subdivisions      22       1       —         —         22       1   
    Other securities      266       3       —         —         266       3   
      Total   $  1,686    $  6    $  —      $  —      $  1,686    $  6   

 

BB&T conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment with an unrealized loss for OTTI. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for AFS securities.

 

BB&T uses cash flow modeling to evaluate non-agency RMBS in an unrealized loss position for potential credit impairment. These models give consideration to long-term macroeconomic factors applied to current security default rates, prepayment rates and recovery rates and security-level performance. At June 30, 2013, three non-agency RMBS with an unrealized loss were below investment grade. None of the unrealized losses were significant.

 

At June 30, 2013, $76 million of unrealized loss on municipal securities was the result of fair value hedge basis adjustments that are a component of amortized cost. Municipal securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated for credit impairment through a qualitative analysis of issuer performance and the primary source of repayment. The evaluation of municipal securities indicated there were no credit losses evident.

 

13

NOTE 3. Loans and ACL

 

Covered loans are excluded from the following aging analysis because their related allowance is determined by loan pool performance.  
   
          Accruing            
                    90 Days Or          
              30-89 Days   More Past          
  June 30, 2013   Current   Past Due   Due   Nonaccrual   Total  
                                       
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                                
    Commercial and industrial   $  38,209    $  32    $  3    $  457    $  38,701   
    CRE - other      11,249       10       ―         181       11,440   
    CRE - residential ADC      991       2       ―         65       1,058   
    Other lending subsidiaries      4,372       13       4       2       4,391   
  Retail:                                
    Direct retail lending      15,797       123       30       119       16,069   
    Revolving credit      2,292       20       13       ―         2,325   
    Residential mortgage      21,918       465       68       254       22,705   
    Sales finance      8,764       47       5       5       8,821   
    Other lending subsidiaries      6,151       228       ―         66       6,445   
      Total excluding government and GNMA guaranteed      109,743       940       123       1,149       111,955   
                                       
  Residential mortgage loans excluded from above:                                
    Government guaranteed      256       93       244       ―         593   
    GNMA guaranteed      ―         5       492       ―         497   
      Total   $  109,999    $  1,038    $  859    $  1,149    $  113,045   

 

            Accruing            
                      90 Days Or          
                30-89 Days   More Past          
  December 31, 2012   Current   Past Due   Due   Nonaccrual   Total  
                                         
            (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                                
    Commercial and industrial   $  37,706    $  42    $  1    $  546    $  38,295   
    CRE - other      11,237       12       ―         212       11,461   
    CRE - residential ADC      1,131       2       ―         128       1,261   
    Other lending subsidiaries      4,106       20       9       3       4,138   
  Retail:                                
    Direct retail lending      15,502       145       38       132       15,817   
    Revolving credit      2,291       23       16       ―         2,330   
    Residential mortgage      22,330       498       92       269       23,189   
    Sales finance      7,663       56       10       7       7,736   
    Other lending subsidiaries      5,645       270       1       83       5,999   
      Total excluding government and GNMA guaranteed      107,611       1,068       167       1,380       110,226   
                                         
  Residential mortgage loans excluded from above:                                
    Government guaranteed      225       84       252       ―         561   
    GNMA guaranteed      ―         5       517       ―         522   
      Total   $  107,836    $  1,157    $  936    $  1,380    $  111,309   

 

14

 

      ACL Rollforward  
        Beginning   Charge-             Ending  
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2013   Balance   Offs   Recoveries   Provision   Balance  
                                     
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                                
    Commercial and industrial   $  528    $  (70)   $  10    $  (9)   $  459   
    CRE - other      171       (30)      7       54       202   
    CRE - residential ADC      47       (19)      3       37       68   
    Other lending subsidiaries      13       (1)      ―         4       16   
  Retail:                                
    Direct retail lending      254       (42)      10       (4)      218   
    Revolving credit      97       (20)      5       31       113   
    Residential mortgage      316       (16)      1       28       329   
    Sales finance      30       (5)      2       15       42   
    Other lending subsidiaries      300       (60)      10       38       288   
  Covered      139       (2)      ―         (11)      126   
  Unallocated      80       ―         ―         (40)      40   
  ALLL      1,975       (265)      48       143       1,901   
  RUFC      56       ―         ―         25       81   
  ACL   $  2,031    $  (265)   $  48    $  168    $  1,982   

 

      ACL Rollforward  
        Beginning   Charge-             Ending  
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2012   Balance   Offs   Recoveries   Provision   Balance  
                                     
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                                
    Commercial and industrial   $  526    $  (92)   $  4    $  87    $  525   
    CRE - other      294       (51)      3       59       305   
    CRE - residential ADC      206       (74)      23       2       157   
    Other lending subsidiaries      13       (3)      ―         3       13   
  Retail:                                
    Direct retail lending      301       (56)      8       30       283   
    Revolving credit      94       (20)      4       12       90   
    Residential mortgage      301       (30)      1       37       309   
    Sales finance      32       (7)      2       (2)      25   
    Other lending subsidiaries      182       (44)      7       55       200   
  Covered      137       (12)      ―         14       139   
  Unallocated      95       ―         ―         (15)      80   
  ALLL      2,181       (389)      52       282       2,126   
  RUFC      40       ―         ―         (9)      31   
  ACL   $  2,221    $  (389)   $  52    $  273    $  2,157   

 

15

 

      ACL Rollforward  
        Beginning   Charge-             Ending  
  Six Months Ended June 30, 2013   Balance   Offs   Recoveries   Provision   Balance  
                                     
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                                
    Commercial and industrial   $  470    $  (161)   $  17    $  133    $  459   
    CRE - other      204       (66)      11       53       202   
    CRE - residential ADC      100       (39)      9       (2)      68   
    Other lending subsidiaries      13       (2)      1       4       16   
                                     
  Retail:                                
    Direct retail lending      300       (84)      18       (16)      218   
    Revolving credit      102       (41)      10       42       113   
    Residential mortgage      328       (49)      2       48       329   
    Sales finance      29       (11)      4       20       42   
    Other lending subsidiaries      264       (127)      18       133       288   
                                     
  Covered      128       (16)      ―         14       126   
                                     
  Unallocated      80       ―         ―         (40)      40   
  ALLL      2,018       (596)      90       389       1,901   
  RUFC      30       ―         ―         51       81   
  ACL   $  2,048    $  (596)   $  90    $  440    $  1,982   

 

      ACL Rollforward  
        Beginning   Charge-             Ending  
  Six Months Ended June 30, 2012   Balance   Offs   Recoveries   Provision   Balance  
                                     
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                                
    Commercial and industrial   $  433    $  (155)   $  8    $  239    $  525   
    CRE - other      334       (124)      6       89       305   
    CRE - residential ADC      286       (128)      31       (32)      157   
    Other lending subsidiaries      11       (6)      1       7       13   
                                     
  Retail:                                
    Direct retail lending      232       (113)      18       146       283   
    Revolving credit      112       (42)      9       11       90   
    Residential mortgage      365       (72)      2       14       309   
    Sales finance      38       (14)      5       (4)      25   
    Other lending subsidiaries      186       (101)      13       102       200   
                                     
  Covered      149       (27)      ―         17       139   
                                     
  Unallocated      110       ―         ―         (30)      80   
  ALLL      2,256       (782)      93       559       2,126   
  RUFC      29       ―         ―         2       31   
  ACL   $  2,285    $  (782)   $  93    $  561    $  2,157   

 

16

 

          ALLL  
          June 30, 2013   December 31, 2012  
          Individually   Collectively   Individually   Collectively  
          Evaluated   Evaluated   Evaluated   Evaluated  
          for   for   for   for  
      Impairment   Impairment   Impairment   Impairment  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                          
    Commercial and industrial   $  70    $  389    $  73    $  397   
    CRE - other      33       169       36       168   
    CRE - residential ADC      10       58       21       79   
    Other lending subsidiaries      ―         16       1       12   
  Retail:                          
    Direct retail lending      41       177       59       241   
    Revolving credit      23       90       24       78   
    Residential mortgage      164       165       130       198   
    Sales finance      4       38       6       23   
    Other lending subsidiaries      81       207       61       203   
  Covered      ―         126       ―         128   
  Unallocated      ―         40       ―         80   
      Total   $  426    $  1,475    $  411    $  1,607   

 

          Loans and Leases  
          June 30, 2013   December 31, 2012  
          Individually   Collectively   Individually   Collectively  
          Evaluated   Evaluated   Evaluated   Evaluated  
          for   for   for   for  
      Impairment   Impairment   Impairment   Impairment  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                          
    Commercial and industrial   $  545    $  38,156    $  631    $  37,664   
    CRE - other      278       11,162       312       11,149   
    CRE - residential ADC      94       964       155       1,106   
    Other lending subsidiaries      3       4,388       3       4,135   
  Retail:                          
    Direct retail lending      225       15,844       235       15,582   
    Revolving credit      53       2,272       56       2,274   
    Residential mortgage      1,239       22,556       1,187       23,085   
    Sales finance      21       8,800       22       7,714   
    Other lending subsidiaries      202       6,243       146       5,853   
  Covered      ―         2,749       ―         3,294   
      Total   $  2,660    $  113,134    $  2,747    $  111,856   

 

BB&T monitors the credit quality of its commercial portfolio using internal risk ratings, which are based on established regulatory guidance. BB&T assigns an internal risk rating at loan origination and reviews the relationship again on an annual basis or at any point management becomes aware of information affecting the borrower’s ability to fulfill their obligations.
         
  Risk Rating   Description  
  Pass   Loans not considered to be problem credits  
  Special Mention   Loans that have a potential weakness deserving management's close attention  
  Substandard   Loans for which a well-defined weakness has been identified that may put full collection of contractual cash flows at risk  
     
BB&T monitors the credit quality of its retail portfolio based primarily on delinquency status, which is the primary factor considered in determining whether a retail loan should be classified as nonaccrual.

 

17

 

Covered loans are excluded from the following analysis because their related allowance is determined by loan pool performance.
 
                    CRE -   Other  
          Commercial       Residential   Lending  
  June 30, 2013   & Industrial   CRE - Other   ADC   Subsidiaries  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                          
    Pass   $  36,714    $  10,390    $  810    $  4,351   
    Special mention      249       114       16       25   
    Substandard - performing      1,281       755       167       13   
    Nonperforming      457       181       65       2   
      Total   $  38,701    $  11,440    $  1,058    $  4,391   

 

          Direct Retail   Revolving   Residential   Sales   Other Lending  
          Lending   Credit   Mortgage   Finance   Subsidiaries  
                                       
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Retail:                                
    Performing   $  15,950    $  2,325    $  23,541    $  8,816    $  6,379   
    Nonperforming      119       ―         254       5       66   
      Total   $  16,069    $  2,325    $  23,795    $  8,821    $  6,445   

 

                    CRE -   Other  
          Commercial       Residential   Lending  
  December 31, 2012   & Industrial   CRE - Other   ADC   Subsidiaries  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                          
    Pass   $  36,044    $  10,095    $  859    $  4,093   
    Special mention      274       120       41       13   
    Substandard - performing      1,431       1,034       233       29   
    Nonperforming      546       212       128       3   
      Total   $  38,295    $  11,461    $  1,261    $  4,138   

 

            Direct Retail   Revolving   Residential   Sales   Other Lending  
            Lending   Credit   Mortgage   Finance   Subsidiaries  
                                         
            (Dollars in millions)  
  Retail:                                
    Performing   $  15,685    $  2,330    $  24,003    $  7,729    $  5,916   
    Nonperforming      132       ―         269       7       83   
      Total   $  15,817    $  2,330    $  24,272    $  7,736    $  5,999   

 

18

 

The following tables set forth certain information regarding BB&T's impaired loans, excluding purchased impaired loans and LHFS, that were evaluated for specific reserves.
               
                            Average   Interest  
            Recorded       Related   Recorded   Income  
  As Of / For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2013   Investment   UPB   Allowance   Investment   Recognized  
                                         
            (Dollars in millions)  
  With no related allowance recorded:                                
    Commercial:                                
      Commercial and industrial   $  116    $  228    $  ―      $  121    $  ―     
      CRE - other      43       74       ―         57       ―     
      CRE - residential ADC      29       63       ―         39       ―     
    Retail:                                
      Direct retail lending      24       81       ―         23       1   
      Residential mortgage (1)      130       217       ―         122       2   
      Sales finance      1       3       ―         1       ―     
      Other lending subsidiaries      2       7       ―         3       ―     
  With an allowance recorded:                                
    Commercial:                                
      Commercial and industrial      429       462       70       498       2   
      CRE - other      235       250       33       241       2   
      CRE - residential ADC      65       69       10       88       1   
      Other lending subsidiaries      3       2       ―         2       ―     
    Retail:                                
      Direct retail lending      201       205       41       209       6   
      Revolving credit      53       53       23       55       1   
      Residential mortgage (1)      743       759       108       746       16   
      Sales finance      20       20       4       21       1   
      Other lending subsidiaries      200       201       81       171       4   
        Total (1)   $  2,294    $  2,694    $  370    $  2,397    $  36   

 

19

 

                            Average   Interest  
            Recorded       Related   Recorded   Income  
  As Of / For The Year Ended December 31, 2012   Investment   UPB   Allowance   Investment   Recognized  
                                         
            (Dollars in millions)  
  With no related allowance recorded:                                
    Commercial:                                
      Commercial and industrial   $  116    $  232    $  ―      $  117    $  ―     
      CRE - other      60       108       ―         81       ―     
      CRE - residential ADC      44       115       ―         103       ―     
    Retail:                                
      Direct retail lending      19       73       ―         19       1   
      Residential mortgage (1)      120       201       ―         80       2   
      Sales finance      1       3       ―         1       ―     
      Other lending subsidiaries      2       6       ―         3       ―     
  With an allowance recorded:                                
    Commercial:                                
      Commercial and industrial      515       551       73       522       3   
      CRE - other      252       255       36       319       5   
      CRE - residential ADC      111       116       21       180       1   
      Other lending subsidiaries      3       3       1       4       ―     
    Retail:                                
      Direct retail lending      216       226       59       140       9   
      Revolving credit      56       56       24       59       2   
      Residential mortgage (1)      754       770       104       649       28   
      Sales finance      21       21       6       13       ―     
      Other lending subsidiaries      144       146       61       66       2   
        Total (1)   $  2,434    $  2,882    $  385    $  2,356    $  53   
                                         
                                         
(1) Residential mortgage loans exclude $366 million and $313 million in government guaranteed loans and related allowance of $56 million and $26 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  

 

Changes in the carrying value and accretable yield of covered loans are presented in the following table.
                                                   
      Six Months Ended June 30, 2013   Year Ended December 31, 2012
      Purchased Impaired   Purchased Nonimpaired   Purchased Impaired   Purchased Nonimpaired
            Carrying         Carrying         Carrying         Carrying
      Accretable   Amount   Accretable   Amount   Accretable   Amount   Accretable   Amount
      Yield   of Loans   Yield   of Loans   Yield   of Loans   Yield   of Loans
                                                   
      (Dollars in millions)
Balance at beginning of period $  264    $  1,400    $  617    $  1,894    $  520    $  2,123    $  1,193    $  2,744 
  Accretion    (80)      80       (175)      175       (219)      219       (541)      541 
  Payments received, net    ―         (307)      ―         (493)      ―         (942)      ―         (1,391)
  Other, net    23       ―         14       ―         (37)      ―         (35)      ―   
Balance at end of period $  207    $  1,173    $  456    $  1,576    $  264    $  1,400    $  617    $  1,894 
                                                   
Outstanding UPB at end of period       $  1,687          $  2,026          $  2,047          $  2,489 

 

20

 

The following table provides a summary of TDRs, all of which are considered impaired.
                   
        June 30,   December 31,  
        2013   2012  
                   
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Performing TDRs:            
    Commercial:            
      Commercial and industrial $  59    $  77   
      CRE - other    61       67   
      CRE - residential ADC    26       21   
    Direct retail lending    188       197   
    Sales finance    17       19   
    Revolving credit    53       56   
    Residential mortgage    726       769   
    Other lending subsidiaries    183       121   
      Total performing TDRs    1,313       1,327   
  Nonperforming TDRs (also included in NPL disclosures)    211       240   
      Total TDRs $  1,524    $  1,567   
                   
  ALLL attributable to TDRs, excluding government guaranteed $  279    $  281   
                   
  Government guaranteed residential mortgage TDRs excluded from above table:            
    Held for investment $  366    $  313   
    Held for sale    1       2   

 

The following tables include modifications made to existing TDRs, as well as new modifications that are considered TDRs. Balances represent the recorded investment as of the end of the period in which the modification was made. Rate modifications include TDRs made with below market interest rates that also include modifications of loan structures.

 

              Three Months Ended June 30,  
              2013   2012  
              Types of       Types of      
              Modifications   Impact To   Modifications   Impact To  
              Rate   Structure   Allowance   Rate   Structure   Allowance  
                                                 
              (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                                    
    Commercial and industrial $  23    $  9    $  1    $  9    $  11    $  ―     
    CRE - other    10       14       ―         26       5       (1)  
    CRE - residential ADC    10       3       (2)      22       8       (2)  
                                                 
  Retail:                                    
    Direct retail lending    9       3       1       10       4       2   
    Revolving credit    6       ―         1       7       ―         1   
    Residential mortgage    20       26       3       27       37       6   
    Sales finance    10       11       1       1       ―         ―     
    Other lending subsidiaries    37       ―         6       21       ―         4   

 

21

 

              Six Months Ended June 30,  
              2013   2012  
              Types of       Types of      
              Modifications   Impact To   Modifications   Impact To  
              Rate   Structure   Allowance   Rate   Structure   Allowance  
                                                 
              (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                                    
    Commercial and industrial $  38    $  15    $  1    $  14    $  39    $  ―     
    CRE - other    37       29       1       30       14       ―     
    CRE - residential ADC    15       5       (2)      22       21       (2)  
  Retail:                                    
    Direct retail lending    21       5       2       16       6       3   
    Revolving credit    14       ―         3       15       ―         3   
    Residential mortgage    35       47       6       82       46       9   
    Sales finance    28       16       2       3       ―         ―     
    Other lending subsidiaries    92       ―         24       29       2       8   
                                                 
Charge-offs and forgiveness of principal and interest for TDRs were immaterial for all periods presented.

 

The following table summarizes the pre-default balance for modifications that experienced a payment default that had been classified as TDRs during the previous 12 months. BB&T defines payment default as movement of the TDR to nonaccrual status, foreclosure or charge-off, whichever occurs first.

 

          Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,  
          2013   2012   2013   2012  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                        
    Commercial and industrial $  1    $  2    $  3    $  4   
    Commercial real estate - other    6       4       6       5   
    Commercial real estate - residential ADC    3       4       4       12   
                                 
  Retail:                        
    Direct retail lending    1       2       2       4   
    Revolving credit    2       3       5       6   
    Residential mortgage    4       7       12       24   
    Sales finance    1       ―         1       ―     
    Other lending subsidiaries    6       1       12       3   

 

The following table provides a summary of BB&T’s NPAs and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing:
                   
        June 30,   December 31,  
        2013   2012  
                   
        (Dollars in millions)  
               
  NPLs held for investment $  1,149    $  1,380   
  Foreclosed real estate    89       107   
  Other foreclosed property    38       49   
      Total NPAs (excluding covered assets) $  1,276    $  1,536   
                   
  Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing (excluding covered loans) $  123    $  167   
                   
  Amounts excluded from above table:            
    Covered foreclosed real estate $  181    $  254   
    GNMA guaranteed residential mortgage loans 90 days or more past due    492       517   
    Covered loans 90 days or more past due    401       442   
    Government guaranteed residential mortgage loans 90 days or more past due    244       252   

 

22

NOTE 4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

There have been no goodwill impairments recorded by BB&T to date.

 

            Residential   Dealer                  
        Community   Mortgage   Financial   Specialized   Insurance   Financial      
        Banking   Banking   Services   Lending   Services   Services   Total  
                                                 
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Goodwill balance, January 1, 2013 $  4,900    $  7    $  111    $  99    $  1,495    $  192    $  6,804   
    Contingent consideration    ―         ―         ―         ―         6       ―         6   
    Other adjustments    24       ―         ―         (2)      (8)      ―         14   
  Goodwill balance, June 30, 2013 $  4,924    $  7    $  111    $  97    $  1,493    $  192    $  6,824   

 

The following table presents the gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization for BB&T’s identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization:
                                           
        June 30, 2013   December 31, 2012  
        Gross       Net   Gross       Net  
        Carrying   Accumulated   Carrying   Carrying   Accumulated   Carrying  
        Amount   Amortization   Amount   Amount   Amortization   Amount  
                                           
        (Dollars in millions)  
  CDI $  672    $  (539)   $  133    $  672    $  (522)   $  150   
  Other, primarily customer relationship intangibles    1,081       (594)      487       1,080       (557)      523   
    Total $  1,753    $  (1,133)   $  620    $  1,752    $  (1,079)   $  673   

 

NOTE 5. Loan Servicing

 

Residential Mortgage Banking Activities

 

The following tables summarize residential mortgage banking activities for the periods presented:

 

        June 30,   December 31,  
        2013   2012  
                   
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Mortgage loans managed or securitized (1) $  28,014    $  29,882   
  Less: Loans securitized and transferred to AFS securities    4       4   
    LHFS    2,419       3,547   
    Covered mortgage loans    910       1,040   
    Mortgage loans sold with recourse    886       1,019   
  Mortgage loans held for investment $  23,795    $  24,272   
                   
  Mortgage loans on nonaccrual status $  254    $  269   
  Mortgage loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest (2)    68       92   
  Mortgage loans net charge-offs - year to date    47       133   
  UPB of residential mortgage loan servicing portfolio    107,057       101,270   
  UPB of residential mortgage loans serviced for others (primarily agency conforming            
    fixed rate)    80,846       73,769   
  Maximum recourse exposure from mortgage loans sold with recourse liability    403       446   
  Recorded reserves related to recourse exposure    12       12   
  Repurchase reserves for mortgage loan sales to GSEs    59       59   
                   
                   
(1) Balances exclude loans serviced for others with no other continuing involvement.
(2) Includes amounts related to residential mortgage LHFS and excludes amounts related to government guaranteed loans and covered mortgage loans.

 

23

 

        As Of / For The  
        Six Months Ended June 30,  
        2013   2012  
                       
        (Dollars in millions)    
  UPB of residential mortgage loans sold from the held for sale portfolio $  16,541      $  12,675     
  Pre-tax gains recognized on mortgage loans sold and held for sale    219         236     
  Servicing fees recognized from mortgage loans serviced for others    127         121     
  Approximate weighted average servicing fee on the outstanding balance of                
    residential mortgage loans serviced for others    0.31  %      0.33  %  
  Weighted average coupon interest rate on mortgage loans serviced for others    4.32         4.81     

 

Gains on residential mortgage loan sales, including marking LHFS to fair value and the impact of interest rate lock commitments, are recorded in noninterest income as a component of mortgage banking income. BB&T retained the related MSRs and receives servicing fees.

 

Payments made to date where BB&T has recourse exposure on residential mortgage loans sold with recourse liability have been immaterial.

 

BB&T also issues standard representations and warranties related to mortgage loan sales to GSEs. Although these agreements often do not specify limitations, BB&T does not believe that any payments related to these warranties would materially change the financial condition or results of operations of BB&T.

 

Residential MSRs are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. BB&T uses various derivative instruments to mitigate the income statement effect of changes in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs and assumptions of its residential MSRs.

 

          Six Months Ended June 30,  
            2013     2012  
                     
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Carrying value, January 1, $  627    $  563   
    Additions    192       134   
    Change in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions:            
      Prepayment speeds    218       12   
      Weighted average OAS    (44)      (36)  
      Servicing costs    (21)      (22)  
    Realization of expected net servicing cash flows, passage of time and other    (80)      (73)  
  Carrying value, June 30, $  892    $  578   
                     
  Gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments used to mitigate the            
    income statement effect of changes in fair value $  (133)   $  99   

 

During 2013, the prepayment speed assumptions were updated as actual observed prepayment speeds were slower, primarily as a result of rising interest rates. These valuation increases were partially offset by realization of servicing cash flows as well as higher servicing costs due to regulatory requirements and decreases to OAS due to market changes in required rates of return.

 

The sensitivity of the fair value of the residential MSRs to adverse changes in key economic assumptions is included in the accompanying table:

 

24

 

        June 30, 2013  
        Range   Weighted  
        Minimum   Maximum   Average  
                           
                    (Dollars in millions)  
                           
  Prepayment speed  6.9  %    11.9  %      8.7  %  
    Effect on fair value of a 10% increase             $  (32)    
    Effect on fair value of a 20% increase                (63)    
                           
  OAS  9.5  %    10.2  %      9.7  %  
    Effect on fair value of a 10% increase             $  (33)    
    Effect on fair value of a 20% increase                (63)    
                           
  Composition of residential loans serviced for others:                    
    Fixed-rate mortgage loans                99.6  %  
    Adjustable-rate mortgage loans                0.4     
      Total                100.0  %  
                           
  Weighted average life                7.1  yrs  

 

The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. As indicated, changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the above table, the effect of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated without changing any other assumption; while in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which may magnify or counteract the effect of the change.

 

Commercial Mortgage Banking Activities

 

CRE mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in loans and leases on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes commercial mortgage banking activities for the periods presented:

 

          June 30,   December 31,  
          2013   2012  
                     
          (Dollars in millions)  
  UPB of CRE mortgages serviced for others $  28,461    $  29,520   
  CRE mortgages serviced for others covered by recourse provisions    5,012       4,970   
  Maximum recourse exposure from CRE mortgages            
    sold with recourse liability    1,384       1,368   
  Recorded reserves related to recourse exposure    12       13   
  Originated CRE mortgages during the period - year to date    1,990       4,934   

 

NOTE 6. Deposits

 

A summary of BB&T's deposits is presented in the accompanying table:
                     
          June 30,   December 31,  
          2013   2012  
                     
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Noninterest-bearing deposits $  33,760    $  32,452   
  Interest checking    19,053       21,091   
  Money market and savings    48,529       47,908   
  Certificates and other time deposits    29,737       31,624   
    Total deposits $  131,079    $  133,075   
                     
  Time deposits $100,000 and greater $  18,039    $  19,328   

 

25

NOTE 7. Long-Term Debt

 

            June 30,   December 31,  
            2013   2012  
                       
            (Dollars in millions)  
  BB&T Corporation:            
    3.38% Senior Notes Due 2013 $  500    $  500   
    5.70% Senior Notes Due 2014    510       510   
    2.05% Senior Notes Due 2014    700       700   
    Floating Rate Senior Note Due 2014 (LIBOR-based, 0.98% at June 30, 2013)    300       300   
    3.95% Senior Notes Due 2016    500       500   
    3.20% Senior Notes Due 2016    999       999   
    2.15% Senior Notes Due 2017    749       748   
    1.60% Senior Notes Due 2017    749       749   
    1.45% Senior Notes Due 2018    499       499   
    Floating Rate Senior Notes Due 2018 (LIBOR-based, 1.13% at June 30, 2013)    400       ―     
    2.05% Senior Notes Due 2018    599       ―     
    6.85% Senior Notes Due 2019    539       539   
    5.20% Subordinated Notes Due 2015    933       933   
    4.90% Subordinated Notes Due 2017    347       345   
    5.25% Subordinated Notes Due 2019    586       586   
    3.95% Subordinated Notes Due 2022    298       298   
                       
  Branch Bank:            
    Floating Rate Senior Note Due 2016 (LIBOR-based, 0.70% at June 30, 2013)    125       ―     
    4.88% Subordinated Notes Due 2013    ―         222   
    5.63% Subordinated Notes Due 2016    386       386   
    Floating Rate Subordinated Note Due 2016    350       350   
    Floating Rate Subordinated Note Due 2017    262       262   
                       
  FHLB Advances to Branch Bank:            
    Varying maturities to 2034    8,462       8,994   
                       
  Other Long-Term Debt    103       100   
                       
  Fair value hedge-related basis adjustments    466       594   
      Total Long-Term Debt $  19,362    $  19,114   

 

The subordinated notes qualify under the risk-based capital guidelines as Tier 2 supplementary capital, subject to certain limitations. The Branch Bank floating-rate subordinated notes are based on LIBOR, but the majority of the cash flows have been swapped to a fixed rate, with an effective rate paid of 3.25% at June 30, 2013. Certain of the FHLB advances have been swapped to floating rates from fixed rates or from fixed rates to floating rates, with a weighted average rate paid of 3.62% and a weighted average maturity of 6.8 years at June 30, 2013.

 

NOTE 8. Shareholders’ Equity

 

Preferred Stock

 

On May 1, 2013, BB&T issued $500 million of its Series G Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock for net proceeds of $487 million. Dividends on the Series G preferred stock, if declared, are payable quarterly, in arrears, at a rate of 5.20% per annum.

 

Equity-Based Plans

 

At June 30, 2013, BB&T had options, restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding from the following equity-based compensation plans: the 2012 Plan, the 2004 Plan, the Omnibus Plan, and the Directors’ Plan. BB&T’s shareholders have approved all equity-based compensation plans. As of June 30, 2013, the 2012 Plan is the only plan that has shares available for future grants. The 2012 and 2004 Plans allow for accelerated vesting of awards for holders who retire and have met all retirement eligibility requirements and in connection with certain other events.

 

26

BB&T measures the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

 

        Six Months Ended June 30,  
        2013   2012  
                       
  Weighted average assumptions:                
    Risk-free interest rate    1.3  %      1.5  %  
    Dividend yield    3.6         4.4     
    Volatility factor    28.0         33.0     
    Expected life    7.0  yrs      7.0  yrs  
  Fair value of options per share $  5.48      $  6.07     

 

          Wtd. Avg.  
          Exercise  
      Options   Price  
               
  Outstanding at January 1, 2013  45,391,074    $  34.15   
    Granted  403,720       30.08   
    Exercised  (1,165,966)      23.22   
    Forfeited or expired  (4,077,728)      32.69   
  Outstanding at June 30, 2013  40,551,100       34.57   
               
  Exercisable at June 30, 2013  33,619,401       35.88   
               
  Exercisable and expected to vest at June 30, 2013  40,013,065    $  34.66   
             
          Wtd. Avg   
    Restricted      Grant Date   
    Share/Units      Fair Value   
  Nonvested at January 1, 2013  13,930,824    $  19.26   
         Granted  3,964,954       25.59   
         Vested  (2,015,713)      22.80   
         Forfeited  (171,881)      19.55   
  Nonvested at June 30, 2013  15,708,184    $  20.40   
           

 

27

NOTE 9. AOCI

 

Three Months Ended June, 30, 2013   Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs   Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges   Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities   FDIC's Share of Unrealized (Gains) Losses on AFS Securities   Other, net   Total
                                     
            (Dollars in millions)
AOCI balance, April 1, 2013   $  (700)   $  (166)   $  537    $  (269)   $  (14)   $  (612)
  OCI before reclassifications, net of tax      (1)      143       (364)      7       (3)      (218)
  Amounts reclassified from AOCI:                                    
    Personnel expense      20       ―         ―         ―         ―         20 
    Interest income      ―         ―         39       (19)      2       22 
    Interest expense      ―         19       ―         ―         ―         19 
    FDIC loss share income, net      ―         ―         ―         35       ―         35 
    Securities (gains) losses, net      ―         ―         (23)      ―         ―         (23)
      Total before income taxes      20       19       16       16       2       73 
      Less: Income taxes      7       7       6       6       1       27 
        Net of income taxes      13       12       10       10       1       46 
  Net change in OCI      12       155       (354)      17       (2)      (172)
AOCI balance, June 30, 2013   $  (688)   $  (11)   $  183    $  (252)   $  (16)   $  (784)

 

Three Months Ended June, 30, 2012   Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs   Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges   Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities   FDIC's Share of Unrealized (Gains) Losses on AFS Securities   Other, net   Total
                                     
            (Dollars in millions)
AOCI balance, April 1, 2012   $  (592)   $  (158)   $  388    $  (237)   $  (17)   $  (616)
  OCI before reclassifications, net of tax      1       (23)      71       (3)      (2)      44 
  Amounts reclassified from AOCI:                                    
    Personnel expense      17       ―         ―         ―         ―         17 
    Interest income      ―         (4)      (9)      ―         2       (11)
    Interest expense      ―         16       ―         ―         ―         16 
    FDIC loss share income, net      ―         ―         ―         26       ―         26 
    Securities (gains) losses, net      ―         ―         2       ―         ―         2 
      Total before income taxes      17       12       (7)      26       2       50 
      Less: Income taxes      7       5       (3)      9       1       19 
        Net of income taxes      10       7       (4)      17       1       31 
  Net change in OCI      11       (16)      67       14       (1)      75 
AOCI balance, June 30, 2012   $  (581)   $  (174)   $  455    $  (223)   $  (18)   $  (541)

 

28

 

Six Months Ended June, 30, 2013   Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs   Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges   Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities   FDIC's Share of Unrealized (Gains) Losses on AFS Securities   Other, net   Total
                                     
            (Dollars in millions)
AOCI balance, January 1, 2013   $  (714)   $  (173)   $  598    $  (256)   $  (14)   $  (559)
  OCI before reclassifications, net of tax      1       137       (429)      (18)      (3)      (312)
  Amounts reclassified from AOCI:                                    
    Personnel expense      40       ―         ―         ―         ―         40 
    Interest income      ―         ―         68       ―         2       70 
    Interest expense      ―         40       ―         ―         ―         40 
    FDIC loss share income, net      ―         ―         ―         35       ―         35 
    Securities (gains) losses, net      ―         ―         (46)      ―         ―         (46)
      Total before income taxes      40       40       22       35       2       139 
      Less: Income taxes      15       15       8       13       1       52 
        Net of income taxes      25       25       14       22       1       87 
  Net change in OCI      26       162       (415)      4       (2)      (225)
AOCI balance, June 30, 2013   $  (688)   $  (11)   $  183    $  (252)   $  (16)   $  (784)

 

Six Months Ended June, 30, 2012   Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs   Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges   Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities   FDIC's Share of Unrealized (Gains) Losses on AFS Securities   Other, net   Total
                                     
            (Dollars in millions)
AOCI balance, January 1, 2012   $  (603)   $  (159)   $  263    $  (195)   $  (19)   $  (713)
  OCI before reclassifications, net of tax      1       (31)      162       (47)      (1)      84 
  Amounts reclassified from AOCI:                                    
    Personnel expense      34       ―         ―         ―         ―         34 
    Interest income      ―         (8)      37       ―         3       32 
    Interest expense      ―         34       ―         ―         ―         34 
    FDIC loss share income, net      ―         ―         ―         30       ―         30 
    Securities (gains) losses, net      ―         ―         11       ―         ―         11 
      Total before income taxes      34       26       48       30       3       141 
      Less: Income taxes      13       10       18       11       1       53 
        Net of income taxes      21       16       30       19       2       88 
  Net change in OCI      22       (15)      192       (28)      1       172 
AOCI balance, June 30, 2012   $  (581)   $  (174)   $  455    $  (223)   $  (18)   $  (541)

 

NOTE 10. Income Taxes

 

The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was higher than the corresponding period of 2012 primarily due to higher levels of pre-tax income, which is subject to the marginal tax rate. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was higher than the corresponding period of 2012 primarily due to an adjustment for uncertain tax positions as described below.

 

In February 2010, BB&T received an IRS statutory notice of deficiency for tax years 2002-2007 asserting a liability for taxes, penalties and interest of approximately $892 million related to the disallowance of foreign tax credits and other deductions claimed by a subsidiary in connection with a financing transaction. BB&T paid the disputed tax, penalties and interest in March 2010 and filed a lawsuit seeking a refund in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. On February 11, 2013, the U.S. Tax Court issued an adverse opinion in a case between the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and the IRS involving a transaction with a structure similar to BB&T’s financing transaction. Bank of New York Mellon has indicated it intends to appeal the decision. BB&T has confidence in its position because, among other reasons, BB&T has raised arguments and issues in its case that were not considered by the Tax Court in the Bank of New York Mellon case. BB&T’s trial concluded April 2, 2013; however, no decision has been rendered. Nonetheless, BB&T recognized an expense of $281 million in the first quarter of 2013 as a result of its consideration of this adverse decision. As litigation progresses, it is reasonably possible changes in the valuation of uncertain tax positions could range from a benefit of $496 million to an expense of $328 million within the next 12 months.

 

29

NOTE 11. Benefit Plans

 

        Qualified Plan   Nonqualified Plans  
        Three Months Ended June 30,   Three Months Ended June 30,  
        2013   2012   2013   2012  
                               
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Service cost $  37    $  29    $  3    $  2   
  Interest cost    27       24       4       2   
  Estimated return on plan assets    (64)      (49)      ―         ―     
  Amortization and other    20       17       3       1   
    Net periodic benefit cost $  20    $  21    $  10    $  5   

 

        Qualified Plan   Nonqualified Plans  
        Six Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,  
        2013     2012   2013   2012  
                               
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Service cost $  74    $  58    $  6    $  4   
  Interest cost    54       49       7       5   
  Estimated return on plan assets    (128)      (98)      ―         ―     
  Amortization and other    40       34       6       2   
    Net periodic benefit cost $  40    $  43    $  19    $  11   

 

BB&T makes contributions to the qualified pension plan in amounts between the minimum required for funding and the maximum amount deductible for federal income tax purposes. A discretionary contribution of $270 million was made in the first quarter of 2013. Management is considering additional contributions in 2013.

 

NOTE 12. Commitments and Contingencies

 

              June 30,   December 31,  
              2013   2012  
                         
              (Dollars in millions)  
  Letters of credit and financial guarantees written $ 5,012    $  5,164   
  Carrying amount of the liability for letter of credit guarantees   44       30   
                         
  Investments related to affordable housing and historic building rehabilitation projects    1,243       1,223   
  Amount of future funding commitments included in investments related to affordable            
    housing and historic rehabilitation projects    431       461   
  Lending exposure to these affordable housing projects   131       87   
  Tax credits subject to recapture related to affordable housing projects    220       193   
                         
  Investments in private equity and similar investments    269       323   
  Future funding commitments to private equity and similar investments    82       129   

 

Letters of credit and financial guarantees written are unconditional commitments issued by BB&T to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper issuance, bond financing and similar transactions, the majority of which are to tax exempt entities. The credit risk involved in the issuance of these guarantees is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to clients and as such, the instruments are collateralized when necessary.

 

BB&T invests in certain affordable housing and historic building rehabilitation projects throughout its market area as a means of supporting local communities, and receives tax credits related to these investments. BB&T typically acts as a limited partner in these investments and does not exert control over the operating or financial policies of the partnerships. Branch Bank typically provides financing during the construction and development of the properties; however, permanent financing is generally obtained from independent third parties upon completion of a project. Tax credits are subject to recapture by taxing authorities based on compliance features required to be met at the project level. BB&T’s maximum potential exposure to losses relative to investments in VIEs is generally limited to the sum of the carrying amount of the investment, tax credits subject to recapture and any related loans to the entity. Loans to these entities are underwritten in substantially the same manner as are other loans and are generally secured.

 

30

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The nature of the business of BB&T’s banking and other subsidiaries ordinarily results in a certain amount of claims, litigation, investigations and legal and administrative cases and proceedings, all of which are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. BB&T believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and, with respect to such legal proceedings, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously, litigating or settling cases according to management’s judgment as to what is in the best interests of BB&T and its shareholders.

 

The Company was a defendant in three separate cases primarily challenging the Company’s daily ordering of debit transactions posted to customer checking accounts for the period from 2003 to 2010. The final case was resolved during March 2013, at which time the court issued an order compelling arbitration and dismissing the matter. The time for an appeal from that order expired with no appeal being taken. As a result, all three matters are now concluded.

 

On at least a quarterly basis, BB&T assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For those matters where it is probable that BB&T will incur a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, BB&T records a liability in its consolidated financial statements. These legal reserves may be increased or decreased to reflect any relevant developments on at least a quarterly basis. For other matters, where a loss is not probable or the amount of the loss is not estimable, BB&T has not accrued legal reserves. While the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel and available insurance coverage, BB&T’s management believes that its established legal reserves are adequate and the liabilities arising from BB&T’s legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows of BB&T. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to BB&T’s consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows.

 

NOTE 13. Fair Value Disclosures

 

BB&T carries various assets and liabilities at fair value based on applicable accounting standards, including prime residential mortgage and commercial mortgage loans originated as LHFS. Accounting standards define fair value as the exchange price that would be received on the measurement date to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market available to the entity in an orderly transaction between market participants, with a three level valuation input hierarchy.

 

31

 

            Fair Value Measurements for Assets and  
        June 30,   Liabilities Measured on a  Recurring Basis  
         2013   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3  
                               
              (Dollars in millions)  
  Assets:                        
    Trading securities $  537    $  224    $  301    $  12   
    AFS securities:                        
      GSE securities    441       ―         441       ―     
      RMBS issued by GSE    20,343       ―         20,343       ―     
      States and political subdivisions    1,888       ―         1,888       ―     
      Non-agency RMBS    285       ―         285       ―     
      Other securities    5       5       ―         ―     
      Covered securities    1,515       ―         562       953   
    LHFS    2,488       ―         2,488       ―     
    Residential MSRs    892       ―         ―         892   
    Derivative assets:                        
      Interest rate contracts    1,311       ―         1,304       7   
      Foreign exchange contracts    4       ―         4       ―     
    Private equity and similar investments    269       ―         ―         269   
      Total assets $  29,978    $  229    $  27,616    $  2,133   
                               
  Liabilities:                        
    Derivative liabilities:                        
      Interest rate contracts $  1,334    $  ―      $  1,238    $  96   
      Foreign exchange contracts    2       ―         2       ―     
    Short-term borrowings    259       ―         259       ―     
      Total liabilities $  1,595    $  ―      $  1,499    $  96   

 

            Fair Value Measurements for Assets and  
        December 31,   Liabilities Measured on a  Recurring Basis  
        2012   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3  
                               
              (Dollars in millions)  
  Assets:                        
    Trading securities $  497    $  302    $  194    $  1   
    AFS securities:                        
      GSE securities    290       ―         290       ―     
      RMBS issued by GSE    20,930       ―         20,930       ―     
      States and political subdivisions    2,011       ―         2,011       ―     
      Non-agency RMBS    312       ―         312       ―     
      Other securities    3       2       1       ―     
      Covered securities    1,591       ―         597       994   
    LHFS    3,761       ―         3,761       ―     
    Residential MSRs    627       ―         ―         627   
    Derivative assets:                        
      Interest rate contracts    1,446       ―         1,391       55   
      Foreign exchange contracts    4       ―         4       ―     
    Private equity and similar investments    323       ―         ―         323   
      Total assets $  31,795    $  304    $  29,491    $  2,000   
                               
  Liabilities:                        
    Derivative liabilities:                        
      Interest rate contracts $  1,434    $  ―      $  1,433    $  1   
      Foreign exchange contracts    3       ―         3       ―     
    Short-term borrowings    98       ―         98       ―     
      Total liabilities $  1,535    $  ―      $  1,534    $  1   

 

32

The following discussion focuses on the valuation techniques and significant inputs for BB&T’s Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities.

 

BB&T generally utilizes a third-party pricing service in determining the fair value of its securities portfolio. Fair value measurements are derived from market-based pricing matrices that were developed using observable inputs that include benchmark yields, benchmark securities, reported trades, offers, bids, issuer spreads and broker quotes. As described by security type below, additional inputs may be used, or some inputs may not be applicable. In the event that market observable data was not available, which would generally occur due to the lack of an active market for a given security, the valuation of the security would be subjective and may involve substantial judgment by management.

 

Trading securities: Trading securities are composed of various types of debt and equity securities, but the majority consists of debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury, GSEs, or states and political subdivisions. The valuation techniques used for these investments are more fully discussed below.

 

GSE securities and RMBS issued by GSE: These are debt securities issued by GSEs. GSE pass-through securities are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including benchmark TBA security pricing and yield curves that were estimated based on U.S. Treasury yields and certain floating rate indices. The pricing matrices for these securities may also give consideration to pool-specific data supplied directly by the GSE. GSE CMOs are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including offers, bids, reported trades, dealer quotes and market research reports, the characteristics of a specific tranche, market convention prepayment speeds and benchmark yield curves as described above.

 

States and political subdivisions: These securities are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including MSRB reported trades, issuer spreads, material event notices and benchmark yield curves.

 

Non-agency RMBS: Pricing matrices for these securities are based on observable inputs including offers, bids, reported trades, dealer quotes and market research reports, the characteristics of a specific tranche, market convention prepayment speeds and benchmark yield curves as described above.

 

Other securities: These securities consist primarily of mutual funds and corporate bonds. These securities are valued based on a review of quoted market prices for assets as well as through the various other inputs discussed previously.

 

Covered securities: Covered securities are covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements and consist of re-remic non-agency RMBS, municipal securities and non-agency RMBS. Covered state and political subdivision securities and certain non-agency RMBS are valued in a manner similar to the approach described above for these asset classes. The re-remic non-agency RMBS, which are categorized as Level 3, were valued based on broker dealer quotes that reflected certain unobservable market inputs. Sensitivity to changes in the fair value of covered securities is significantly offset by changes in BB&T’s indemnification asset from the FDIC.

 

LHFS: BB&T originates certain mortgage loans to be sold to investors, which are carried at fair value. The fair value is primarily based on quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. The changes in fair value of these assets are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with the mortgage LHFS.

 

Residential MSRs: BB&T estimates the fair value of residential MSRs using an OAS valuation model to project MSR cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios, which are then discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The OAS model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenue, costs to service and other economic factors. Fair value estimates and assumptions are compared to industry surveys, recent market activity, actual portfolio experience and, when available, other observable market data.

 

Derivative assets and liabilities: The fair values of derivatives are determined based on quoted market prices and internal pricing models that are primarily sensitive to market observable data. The fair values of interest rate lock commitments, which are related to mortgage loan commitments and are categorized as Level 3, are based on quoted market prices adjusted for commitments that BB&T does not expect to fund and include the value attributable to the net servicing fees.

 

33

Private equity and similar investments: BB&T has private equity and similar investments that are measured at fair value based on the investment’s net asset value. In many cases there are no observable market values for these investments and therefore management must estimate the fair value based on a comparison of the operating performance of the company to multiples in the marketplace for similar entities. This analysis requires significant judgment and actual values in a sale could differ materially from those estimated.

 

Short-term borrowings: Short-term borrowings represent debt securities sold short that are entered into through BB&T’s brokerage subsidiary as a hedging strategy for the purposes of supporting institutional and retail client trading activities.

 

              Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
                                    Private Equity
                    Covered   Residential   Net   and Similar
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013   Trading   Securities   MSRs   Derivatives   Investments
     
              (Dollars in millions)
Balance at April 1, 2013   $  1    $  996    $  735    $  35    $  330 
  Total realized and unrealized gains or losses:                              
    Included in earnings:                              
      Interest income      ―         8       ―         ―         ―   
      Mortgage banking income      ―         ―         100       30       ―   
      Other noninterest income      ―         ―         ―         ―         6 
    Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI      ―         (15)      ―         ―         ―   
  Purchases      11       ―         ―         ―         7 
  Issuances      ―         ―         98       (9)      ―   
  Sales      ―         ―         ―         ―         (70)
  Settlements      ―         (36)      (41)      (145)      (4)
Balance at June 30, 2013   $  12    $  953    $  892    $  (89)   $  269 
                                         
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in                              
  earnings for the period, attributable to assets                              
  and liabilities still held at June 30, 2013   $  ―      $  8    $  100    $  (89)   $  5 

 

              Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
                                      Private Equity
                    Covered   Residential   Net   and Similar
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012   Trading   Securities   MSRs   Derivatives   Investments
     
              (Dollars in millions)
Balance at April 1, 2012   $  1    $  1,023    $  696    $  30    $  281 
  Total realized and unrealized gains or losses:                              
    Included in earnings:                              
      Interest income      ―         14       ―         ―         ―   
      Mortgage banking income      ―         ―         (130)      89       ―   
      Other noninterest income      ―         ―         ―         ―         (1)
    Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI      ―         (22)      ―         ―         ―   
  Purchases      ―         ―         ―         ―         28 
  Issuances      ―         ―         50       77       ―   
  Sales      ―         ―         ―         ―         (6)
  Settlements      ―         (33)      (38)      (128)      (1)
Balance at June 30, 2012   $  1    $  982    $  578    $  68    $  301 
                                         
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in                              
  earnings for the period, attributable to assets                              
  and liabilities still held at June 30, 2012   $  ―      $  14    $  (130)   $  68    $  (2)

 

34

 

            Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
                                    Private
                                    Equity and
                  Covered   Residential   Net   Similar
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013   Trading   Securities   MSRs   Derivatives   Investments
                               
            (Dollars in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2013   $  1    $  994    $  627    $  54    $  323 
  Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):                              
    Included in earnings:                              
      Interest income      ―         18       ―         ―         ―   
      Mortgage banking income      ―         ―         155       65       ―   
      Other noninterest income      ―         ―         ―         ―         11 
    Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI      ―         10       ―         ―         ―   
  Purchases      11       ―         ―         ―         30 
  Issuances      ―         ―         192       27       ―   
  Sales      ―         ―         ―         ―         (89)
  Settlements      ―         (69)      (82)      (235)      (6)
Balance at June 30, 2013   $  12    $  953    $  892    $  (89)   $  269 
                                       
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for                              
  the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held                              
  at June 30, 2013   $  ―      $  18    $  155    $  (89)   $  8 

 

            Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
                                    Private
                              Equity and
                  Covered   Residential   Net   Similar
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012   Trading   Securities   MSRs   Derivatives   Investments
                               
            (Dollars in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2012   $  1    $  984    $  563    $  59    $  261 
  Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):                        
    Included in earnings:                              
      Interest income      ―         18       ―         ―         ―   
      Mortgage banking income      ―         ―         (39)      185       ―   
      Other noninterest income      ―         ―         ―         ―         4 
    Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI      ―         40       ―         ―         ―   
  Purchases      ―         ―         ―         ―         52 
  Issuances      ―         ―         134       138       ―   
  Sales      ―         ―         ―         ―         (18)
  Settlements      ―         (60)      (80)      (314)      2 
Balance at June 30, 2012   $  1    $  982    $  578    $  68    $  301 
                                       
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for                              
  the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held                              
  at June 30, 2012   $  ―      $  18    $  (39)   $  68    $  7 

 

BB&T’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out of Levels 1, 2 and 3 as of the end of a reporting period. During the first six months of 2013 and 2012, BB&T did not have any transfer of securities between levels in the fair value hierarchy.

 

The majority of BB&T’s private equity and similar investments are in SBIC qualified funds, which primarily focus on equity and subordinated debt investments in privately-held middle market companies. The majority of these investments are not redeemable and distributions are received as the underlying assets of the funds liquidate. The timing of distributions, which are expected to occur on various dates through 2025, is uncertain and dependent on various events such as recapitalizations, refinance transactions and ownership changes among others. Excluding the investment of future funds, BB&T estimates these investments have a weighted average remaining life of approximately three years; however, the timing and amount of distributions may vary significantly. As of June 30, 2013, restrictions on the ability to sell the investments include, but are not limited to, consent of a majority member or general partner approval for transfer of ownership. BB&T’s investments are spread over numerous privately-held middle market companies, and thus the sensitivity to a change in fair value for any

 

35

single investment is limited. The significant unobservable inputs for these investments are EBITDA multiples that ranged from 3x to 10x, with a weighted average of 7x, at June 30, 2013.

 

The following table details the fair value and UPB of LHFS that were elected to be carried at fair value:
                                             
          June 30, 2013   December 31, 2012  
          Fair   Aggregate       Fair   Aggregate      
          Value   UPB   Difference   Value   UPB   Difference  
                                             
          (Dollars in millions)  
  LHFS reported at fair value $  2,488    $  2,558    $  (70)   $  3,761    $  3,652    $  109   

 

Excluding government guaranteed, there were no LHFS that were nonaccrual or 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest.

 

The following tables provide information about certain financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
                                 
                      June 30, 2013   December 31, 2012  
                                 
                      (Dollars in millions)  
  Assets that are still held (Level 3):                        
    Impaired loans, excluding covered             $  67    $  137   
    Foreclosed real estate, excluding covered                89       107   
                                 
          Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,  
          2013   2012   2013   2012  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Negative valuation adjustments recognized:                        
    Impaired loans, excluding covered $  14    $  25    $  35    $  55   
    Foreclosed real estate, excluding covered    ―         68       2       136   

 

Additionally, accounting standards require the disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value. A financial instrument is defined as cash, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity or a contract that creates a contractual obligation or right to deliver or receive cash or another financial instrument from a second entity. For the financial instruments that BB&T does not record at fair value, estimates of fair value are based on relevant market data and information about the instrument and are based on the value of one trading unit without regard to any premium or discount that may result from concentrations of ownership, possible tax ramifications, estimated transaction costs that may result from bulk sales or the relationship between various financial instruments.

 

No readily available market exists for a significant portion of BB&T’s financial instruments. Fair value estimates for these instruments are based on current economic conditions, currency and interest rate risk characteristics, loss experience and other factors. Many of these estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and cannot be determined with precision. Therefore, the fair value estimates in many instances cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realizable in a current sale of the instrument. In addition, changes in assumptions could significantly affect these fair value estimates. The following methods and assumptions were used by BB&T in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments.

 

Cash and cash equivalents and segregated cash due from banks: For these short-term instruments, the carrying amounts are a reasonable estimate of fair values.

 

HTM securities: The fair values of HTM securities are based on a market approach using observable inputs such as benchmark yields and securities, TBA prices, reported trades, issuer spreads, current bids and offers, monthly payment information and collateral performance.

 

Loans receivable: The fair values for loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, applying interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality, which are deemed to be indicative of orderly transactions in the current market. For commercial loans and leases, discount rates may be adjusted to address additional credit risk on lower risk grade instruments. For residential mortgage and other consumer loans, internal prepayment risk models are used to adjust contractual cash flows. Loans are aggregated into pools of similar terms and credit quality and discounted using a LIBOR based rate. The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair values.

 

36

FDIC loss share receivable: The fair value of the FDIC loss share receivable is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, applying a risk free interest rate that is adjusted for the uncertainty in the timing and amount of these cash flows. The expected cash flows to/from the FDIC related to loans were estimated using the same assumptions that were used in determining the accounting values for the related loans. The expected cash flows to/from the FDIC related to securities are based upon the fair value of the related securities and the payment that would be required if the securities were sold for that amount. The FDIC loss share agreements are not transferrable and, accordingly, there is no market for this receivable.

 

Deposit liabilities: The fair values for demand deposits, interest-checking accounts, savings accounts and certain money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand. Fair values for CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to aggregate expected maturities. In addition, nonfinancial instruments such as core deposit intangibles are not recorded at fair value. BB&T has developed long-term relationships with its customers through its deposit base and, in the opinion of management, these items add significant value to BB&T.

 

Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of Federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowed funds approximate their fair values.

 

Long-term debt: The fair values of long-term debt are estimated based on quoted market prices for the instrument if available, or for similar instruments if not available, or by using discounted cash flow analyses, based on BB&T’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments.

 

Contractual commitments: The fair values of commitments are estimated using the fees charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair values also consider the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of guarantees and letters of credit are estimated based on the counterparties’ creditworthiness and average default rates for loan products with similar risks. These respective fair value measurements would be categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Financial assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value are summarized below:
 
          Carrying   Total          
  June 30, 2013   Amount   Fair Value   Level 2   Level 3  
                         
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Financial assets:                          
    HTM securities   $  13,751    $  13,445    $  13,407    $  38   
    Loans and leases, net of ALLL excluding covered loans      111,270       111,207       ―         111,207   
    Covered loans, net of ALLL      2,623       3,003       ―         3,003   
    FDIC loss share receivable      299       (19)      ―         (19)  
                                 
  Financial liabilities:                          
    Deposits      131,079       131,297       131,297       ―     
    Long-term debt      19,362       20,314       20,314       ―     

 

          Carrying   Total          
  December 31, 2012   Amount   Fair Value   Level 2   Level 3  
                         
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Financial assets:                          
    HTM securities   $  13,594    $  13,848    $  13,810    $  38   
    Loans and leases, net of ALLL excluding covered loans      109,419       109,621       ―         109,621   
    Covered loans, net of ALLL      3,166       3,661       ―         3,661   
    FDIC loss share receivable      479       149       ―         149   
                                 
  Financial liabilities:                          
    Deposits      133,075       133,377       133,377       ―     
    Long-term debt      19,114       20,676       20,676       ―     

 

37

 

The following is a summary of selected information pertaining to off-balance sheet financial instruments:
                               
        June 30, 2013    December 31, 2012  
        Notional/       Notional/      
        Contract       Contract      
      Amount   Fair Value   Amount   Fair Value  
                       
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Commitments to extend, originate or purchase credit   $ 42,605    $ 78    $  41,410    $  74   
  Residential mortgage loans sold with recourse      886      12       1,019       12   
  Other loans sold with recourse      5,012      12       4,970       13   
  Letters of credit and financial guarantees written     5,012      44       5,164       30   

 

38

NOTE 14. Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Derivative Classifications and Hedging Relationships
                                                 
                June 30, 2013   December 31, 2012
            Hedged Item or   Notional   Fair Value   Notional   Fair Value
            Transaction   Amount   Gain   Loss   Amount   Gain   Loss
                                                 
                (Dollars in millions)
Cash flow hedges:                                      
  Interest rate contracts:                                      
    Pay fixed swaps 3 mo. LIBOR funding   $  4,950    $  ―      $  (229)   $  6,035    $  ―      $  (298)
                                                 
Fair value hedges:                                      
  Interest rate contracts:                                      
    Receive fixed swaps and option trades Long-term debt      800       96       ―         800       182       ―   
    Pay fixed swaps Commercial loans      185       ―         (4)      187       ―         (7)
    Pay fixed swaps Municipal securities      345       ―         (106)      345       ―         (153)
        Total        1,330       96       (110)      1,332       182       (160)
                                                 
Not designated as hedges:                                      
  Client-related and other risk management:                                      
    Interest rate contracts:                                      
      Receive fixed swaps        9,109       448       (21)      9,352       687       ―   
      Pay fixed swaps        9,060       17       (476)      9,464       ―         (717)
      Other swaps        1,668       10       (12)      2,664       21       (23)
      Option trades        455       2       (2)      423       3       (5)
      Futures contracts        45       ―         ―         109       ―         ―   
      Risk participations        208       ―         ―         204       ―         ―   
    Foreign exchange contracts        457       4       (2)      534       4       (3)
        Total        21,002       481       (513)      22,750       715       (748)
                                                 
  Mortgage banking:                                      
    Interest rate contracts:                                      
      Receive fixed swaps        240       ―         (8)      114       ―         (2)
      Pay fixed swaps        66       1       ―         ―         ―         ―   
      Interest rate lock commitments        4,927       7       (96)      6,064       55       (1)
      When issued securities, forward rate agreements and forward                                    
        commitments      6,764       291       (54)      8,886       10       (19)
      Option trades        460       12       ―         70       6       ―   
      Futures contracts        6       ―         ―         31       ―         ―   
        Total        12,463       311       (158)      15,165       71       (22)
                                                 
  MSRs:                                      
    Interest rate contracts:                                      
      Receive fixed swaps        7,344       41       (228)      5,178       110       (27)
      Pay fixed swaps        5,951       165       (39)      5,389       7       (94)
      Option trades        8,800       221       (44)      14,510       363       (88)
      Futures contracts        ―         ―         ―         30       ―         ―   
      When issued securities, forward rate agreements and forward                                    
        commitments      2,271       ―         (15)      2,406       2       ―   
        Total        24,366       427       (326)      27,513       482       (209)
          Total nonhedging derivatives      57,831       1,219       (997)      65,428       1,268       (979)
Total derivatives   $  64,111       1,315       (1,336)   $  72,795       1,450       (1,437)
                                                 
Gross amounts not offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:                                    
  Amounts subject to master netting arrangements not offset due to policy election      (653)      653             (797)      797 
  Cash collateral (received) posted            (68)      549             (41)      607 
    Net amount         $  594    $  (134)         $  612    $  (33)

 

39

BB&T has elected to present assets and liabilities related to derivatives on a gross basis. Derivatives in a gain position are recorded as Other assets, derivatives in a loss position are recorded as Other liabilities and cash collateral posted is reported as Restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivatives with dealer counterparties are governed by the terms of ISDA master netting agreements and Credit Support Annexes. The ISDA Agreement allows counterparties to offset trades in a gain against trades in a loss to determine net exposure and allows for the right of setoff in the event of either a default or an additional termination event. Credit Support Annexes govern the terms of daily collateral posting practices. Collateral practices mitigate the potential loss impact to affected parties by requiring liquid collateral to be posted on a scheduled basis to secure the aggregate net unsecured exposure. In addition to collateral, the right of setoff allows counterparties to offset derivative values transacted with a defaulting party with certain other contractual receivables from or obligations due to the defaulting party in determining the net termination amount. No portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives has been excluded from effectiveness testing. The ineffective portion was immaterial for all periods presented.

 

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
                                       
              Effective Portion
              Pre-tax Gain       Pre-tax Gain (Loss)
              (Loss) Recognized       Reclassified from
              in AOCI   Location of Amounts   AOCI into Income
              2013   2012    Reclassified from AOCI into Income   2013   2012 
                                       
                (Dollars in millions)
Cash flow hedges:                          
  Interest rate contracts $  231    $  (39)   Total interest income   $  ―      $  4 
                          Total interest expense      (19)      (16)
                              $  (19)   $  (12)
                                       
                              Pre-tax Gain
                              (Loss) Recognized
                          Location of Amounts   in Income
                          Recognized in Income   2013   2012 
                                       
                              (Dollars in millions)
Fair value hedges:                          
  Interest rate contracts             Total interest income   $  (5)   $  (5)
  Interest rate contracts             Total interest expense      29       106 
        Total                 $  24    $  101 
                                       
Not designated as hedges:                          
  Client-related and other risk management:                
    Interest rate contracts             Other noninterest income   $  8    $  11 
    Foreign exchange contracts             Other noninterest income      5       2 
  Mortgage banking:                          
    Interest rate contracts             Mortgage banking income      125       (18)
  MSRs:                          
    Interest rate contracts             Mortgage banking income      (87)      152 
      Total                 $  51    $  147 

 

40

 

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
                                       
              Effective Portion
              Pre-tax Gain       Pre-tax Gain (Loss)
              (Loss) Recognized   Location of Amounts   Reclassified from
              in AOCI   Reclassified from AOCI   AOCI into Income
              2013   2012    into Income   2013   2012 
                                       
                (Dollars in millions)
Cash Flow Hedges:                          
  Interest rate contracts $  220    $  (52)   Total interest income   $  ―      $  8 
                          Total interest expense      (40)      (34)
                              $  (40)   $  (26)
                                       
                          Effective Portion
                              Pre-tax Gain
                          Location of Amounts   (Loss) Recognized
                          Recognized   in Income
                          in Income   2013   2012 
                                       
                (Dollars in millions)
Fair Value Hedges:                          
  Interest rate contracts             Total interest income   $  (10)   $  (10)
  Interest rate contracts             Total interest expense      59       181 
        Total                 $  49    $  171 
                                       
Not Designated as Hedges:                          
  Client-related and other risk management:                
    Interest rate contracts             Other noninterest income   $  14    $  17 
    Foreign exchange contracts             Other noninterest income      8       4 
  Mortgage Banking:                          
    Interest rate contracts             Mortgage banking income      98       39 
  MSRs:                          
    Interest rate contracts             Mortgage banking income      (133)      99 
      Total                 $  (13)   $  159 

 

41

 

The following table provides a summary of BB&T's derivative strategies and the related accounting treatment:
                 
        Cash Flow Hedges   Fair Value Hedges   Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges
                 
Risk exposure   Variability in cash flows of interest payments on floating rate business loans, overnight funding, FHLB advances, medium-term bank notes and long-term debt.   Losses in value on fixed rate long-term debt, CDs, FHLB advances, loans and state and political subdivision securities due to changes in interest rates.   Risk associated with an asset or liability, including mortgage banking operations and MSRs, or for client needs. Includes exposure to changes in market rates and conditions subsequent to the interest rate lock and funding date for mortgage loans originated for sale.
                 
Risk management objective   Hedge the variability in the interest payments and receipts on future cash flows for forecasted transactions related to the first unhedged payments and receipts of variable interest.   Convert the fixed rate paid or received to a floating rate, primarily through the use of swaps.   For interest rate lock commitment derivatives and LHFS, use mortgage-based derivatives such as forward commitments and options to mitigate market risk. For MSRs, mitigate the income statement effect of changes in the fair value of the MSRs.
                 
Treatment for portion that is highly effective   Recognized in OCI until the related cash flows from the hedged item are recognized in earnings.   Recognized in current period income along with the corresponding changes in the fair value of the designated hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged.   Entire change in fair value recognized in current period income.
                 
Treatment for portion that is ineffective   Recognized in current period income.   Recognized in current period income.   Not applicable
                 
Treatment if hedge ceases to be highly effective or is terminated   Hedge is dedesignated. Effective changes in value that are recorded in OCI before dedesignation are amortized to yield over the period the forecasted hedged transactions impact earnings.   If hedged item remains outstanding, termination proceeds are included in cash flows from financing activities and effective changes in value are reflected as part of the carrying value of the financial instrument and amortized to earnings over its estimated remaining life.   Not applicable
                 
Treatment if transaction is no longer probable of occurring during forecast period or within a short period thereafter   Hedge accounting is ceased and any gain or loss in OCI is reported in earnings immediately.   Not applicable   Not applicable

 

42

 

                           
                           
            June 30,   December 31,  
             2013    2012  
                           
            (Dollars in millions)  
  Cash flow hedges:                  
    Net amount of unrecognized after-tax losses, including both active and terminated                  
      hedges, on derivatives classified as cash flow hedges recorded in OCI   $  11      $  173     
    Estimated after-tax gain (loss) to be reclassified from OCI into earnings during the                  
      next 12 months, including active hedges and hedges that were terminated early for which the forecasted transactions are still probable      (46)        (37)    
                           
            Six Months Ended June 30,  
             2013    2012  
                           
            (Dollars in millions)  
  Cash flow hedges:                  
    Pre-tax deferred gain from terminated cash flow hedges recorded in OCI   $  198      $  ―       
                           
  Fair value hedges:                  
    Pre-tax deferred gain from terminated fair value hedges related to long-term debt      ―           90     
    Pre-tax reduction of interest expense recognized from previously                  
      unwound fair value debt hedges      44         164     
                           

 

Derivatives Credit Risk – Dealer Counterparties

 

Credit risk related to derivatives arises when amounts receivable from a counterparty exceed those payable to the same counterparty. BB&T addresses the risk of loss by subjecting dealer counterparties to credit reviews and approvals similar to those used in making loans or other extensions of credit and by requiring collateral. Dealer counterparties operate under agreements to provide cash and/or liquid collateral when unsecured loss positions exceed negotiated limits.

 

All of BB&T’s derivative contracts with dealer counterparties settle on a monthly, quarterly or semiannual basis, with daily movement of collateral between counterparties required within established netting agreements. BB&T only transacts with dealer counterparties that are national market makers with strong credit ratings.

 

Derivatives Credit Risk – Central Clearing Parties

 

BB&T also clears certain derivatives through central clearing parties that require initial margin collateral, as well as additional collateral for trades in a net loss position. Initial margin collateral requirements are established by central clearing parties on varying bases, with such amounts generally designed to offset the risk of non-payment. Initial margin is generally calculated by applying the maximum loss experienced in value over a specified time horizon to the portfolio of existing trades.

 

43

 

                                   
            June 30,   December 31,  
                 2013    2012  
                                   
                    (Dollars in millions)  
  Cash collateral received from dealer counterparties   $  69      $  44     
  Derivatives in a net gain position secured by that collateral      73         42     
                                 
  Cash collateral posted to dealer counterparties      525         603     
  Derivatives in a net loss position secured by that collateral      525         610     
  Additional collateral that would have been posted had BB&T's credit ratings                  
    dropped below investment grade      2         10     
                                 
  Cash collateral, including initial margin, posted to central clearing parties      26         111     
  Derivatives in a net loss position secured by that collateral      26         7     
  Securities pledged as initial margin to central clearing parties     43        ―      
                     
  Unsecured positions in a net gain with dealer counterparties after collateral postings           ―      
  Significant unsecured positions in a gain with central clearing parties     228        ―      

 

NOTE 15. Computation of EPS

 

BB&T’s basic and diluted EPS calculations are presented in the following table:
                                 
                 
          Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,  
          2013   2012    2013   2012   
                                 
          (Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)  
    Net income available to common shareholders $  547    $  510    $  757    $  941   
                                 
    Weighted average number of common shares    702,082       698,579       701,245       698,132   
    Effect of dilutive outstanding equity-based awards    10,779       9,875       10,753       9,858   
    Weighted average number of diluted common shares    712,861       708,454       711,998       707,990   
                                 
    Basic EPS $  0.78    $  0.73    $  1.08    $  1.35   
                                 
    Diluted EPS $  0.77    $  0.72    $  1.06    $  1.33   
                                 
    Anti-dilutive awards    30,123       33,657       32,144       33,818   

 

44

NOTE 16. Operating Segments

 

The following tables disclose selected financial information with respect to BB&T's reportable business segments for the periods indicated:  
   
BB&T Corporation  
Reportable Segments  
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012  
                                                       
        Community   Residential   Dealer      Specialized  
        Banking   Mortgage Banking   Financial Services   Lending  
        2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012   
                                                       
        (Dollars in millions)  
Net interest income (expense) $  532    $  516    $  294    $  286    $  210    $  210    $  178    $  174   
Net intersegment interest income (expense)    277       326       (185)      (192)      (38)      (50)      (31)      (37)  
Segment net interest income    809       842       109       94       172       160       147       137   
Allocated provision for loan and lease losses    110       189       29       38       42       27       27       23   
Noninterest income    300       279       151       162       1       2       56       52   
Intersegment net referral fees (expense)    45       45       ―         ―         ―         ―         ―         ―     
Noninterest expense    448       446       88       92       28       24       65       58   
Amortization of intangibles    9       10       ―         ―         ―         ―         2       2   
Allocated corporate expenses    258       255       17       13       8       10       16       19   
Income (loss) before income taxes    329       266       126       113       95       101       93       87   
Provision (benefit) for income taxes    120       97       48       43       36       38       25       20   
Segment net income (loss) $  209    $  169    $  78    $  70    $  59    $  63    $  68    $  67   
                                                       
Identifiable segment assets (period end) $  62,998    $  60,961    $  28,345    $  27,318    $  11,188    $  10,303    $  18,892    $  18,140   
                                                   
                                Other, Treasury   Total BB&T  
        Insurance Services   Financial Services   and Corporate (1)   Corporation  
        2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012   
                                                       
        (Dollars in millions)  
Net interest income (expense) $  1    $  ―      $  40    $  33    $  160    $  243    $  1,415    $  1,462   
Net intersegment interest income (expense)    2       1       74       82       (99)      (130)      ―         ―     
Segment net interest income    3       1       114       115       61       113       1,415       1,462   
Allocated provision for loan and lease losses    ―         ―         14       (8)      (54)      4       168       273   
Noninterest income    427       393       183       170       (72)      (92)      1,046       966   
Intersegment net referral fees (expense)    ―         ―         11       6       (56)      (51)      ―         ―     
Noninterest expense    292       260       155       172       393       345       1,469       1,397   
Amortization of intangibles    16       17       ―         1       ―         (1)      27       29   
Allocated corporate expenses    22       20       26       23       (347)      (340)      ―         ―     
Income (loss) before income taxes    100       97       113       103       (59)      (38)      797       729   
Provision (benefit) for income taxes    34       31       42       38       (84)      (76)      221       191   
Segment net income (loss) $  66    $  66    $  71    $  65    $  25    $  38    $  576    $  538   
                                                       
Identifiable segment assets (period end) $  3,164    $  3,299    $  10,425    $  8,312    $  47,723    $  50,196    $  182,735    $  178,529   
                                                       
                                                       
(1) Includes financial data from subsidiaries below the quantitative and qualitative thresholds requiring disclosure.  

 

45

 

BB&T Corporation  
Reportable Segments  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012  
                                                       
        Community   Residential   Dealer   Specialized  
        Banking   Mortgage Banking   Financial Services   Lending  
        2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012   
                                                       
          (Dollars in millions)  
Net interest income (expense) $  1,056    $  1,022    $  593    $  564    $  415    $  420    $  352    $  341   
Net intersegment interest income (expense)    567       666       (376)      (381)      (80)      (104)      (62)      (75)  
Segment net interest income    1,623       1,688       217       183       335       316       290       266   
Allocated provision for loan and lease losses    192       443       46       16       109       54       78       49   
Noninterest income    578       547       312       357       3       4       110       105   
Intersegment net referral fees (expense)    94       85       ―         (1)      ―         ―         ―         ―     
Noninterest expense    877       932       158       177       54       50       128       123   
Amortization of intangibles    19       19       ―         ―         ―         ―         3       3   
Allocated corporate expenses    516       512       33       27       15       19       32       38   
Income (loss) before income taxes    691       414       292       319       160       197       159       158   
Provision (benefit) for income taxes    253       149       111       121       61       75       38       34   
Segment net income (loss) $  438    $  265    $  181    $  198    $  99    $  122    $  121    $  124   
                                                       
Identifiable segment assets (period end) $  62,998    $  60,961    $  28,345    $  27,318    $  11,188    $  10,303    $  18,892    $  18,140   
                                                       
                                Other, Treasury   Total BB&T  
        Insurance Services   Financial Services   and Corporate (1)   Corporation  
        2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012   
                                                       
        (Dollars in millions)  
Net interest income (expense) $  2    $  1    $  74    $  63    $  345    $  487    $  2,837    $  2,898   
Net intersegment interest income (expense)    3       2       154       164       (206)      (272)      ―         ―     
Segment net interest income    5       3       228       227       139       215       2,837       2,898   
Allocated provision for loan and lease losses    ―         ―         23       8       (8)      (9)      440       561   
Noninterest income    793       663       359       348       (108)      (187)      2,047       1,837   
Intersegment net referral fees (expense)    ―         ―         19       12       (113)      (96)      ―         ―     
Noninterest expense    580       472       307       326       752       680       2,856       2,760   
Amortization of intangibles    31       27       1       2       ―         ―         54       51   
Allocated corporate expenses    45       39       50       45       (691)      (680)      ―         ―     
Income (loss) before income taxes    142       128       225       206       (135)      (59)      1,534       1,363   
Provision (benefit) for income taxes    46       39       84       77       109       (115)      702       380   
Segment net income (loss) $  96    $  89    $  141    $  129    $  (244)   $  56    $  832    $  983   
                                                       
Identifiable segment assets (period end) $  3,164    $  3,299    $  10,425    $  8,312    $  47,723    $  50,196    $  182,735    $  178,529   
                                                       
                                                       
(1) Includes financial data from subsidiaries below the quantitative and qualitative thresholds requiring disclosure.  
46

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

BB&T is a financial holding company organized under the laws of North Carolina. BB&T conducts operations through its principal bank subsidiary, Branch Bank, and its nonbank subsidiaries.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, regarding the financial condition, results of operations, business plans and the future performance of BB&T that are based on the beliefs and assumptions of the management of BB&T and the information available to management at the time that these disclosures were prepared. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and other similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

·general economic or business conditions, either nationally or regionally, may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality and/or a reduced demand for credit, insurance or other services;

 

·disruptions to the credit and financial markets, either nationally or globally, including the impact of a downgrade of U.S. government obligations by one of the credit ratings agencies and the adverse effects of the ongoing sovereign debt crisis in Europe;

 

·changes in the interest rate environment and cash flow reassessments may reduce NIM and/or the volumes and values of loans made or held as well as the value of other financial assets held;

 

·competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions may increase significantly;

 

·legislative, regulatory or accounting changes, including changes resulting from the adoption and implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act may adversely affect the businesses in which BB&T is engaged;

 

·local, state or federal taxing authorities may take tax positions that are adverse to BB&T;

 

·a reduction may occur in BB&T’s credit ratings;

 

·adverse changes may occur in the securities markets;

 

·competitors of BB&T may have greater financial resources and develop products that enable them to compete more successfully than BB&T and may be subject to different regulatory standards than BB&T;

 

·natural or other disasters could have an adverse effect on BB&T in that such events could materially disrupt BB&T’s operations or the ability or willingness of BB&T’s customers to access the financial services BB&T offers;

 

·costs or difficulties related to the integration of the businesses of BB&T and its merger partners may be greater than expected;

 

·expected cost savings or revenue growth associated with completed mergers and acquisitions may not be fully realized or realized within the expected time frames;

 

·deposit attrition, customer loss and/or revenue loss following completed mergers and acquisitions may be greater than expected; and

 

·cyber-security risks, including “denial of service,” “hacking” and “identity theft,” that could adversely affect our business and financial performance, or our reputation.

 

These and other risk factors are more fully described in BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 under the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and from time to time, in other filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.

 

47

Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, BB&T undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

 

Regulatory Considerations

 

BB&T and its subsidiaries and affiliates are subject to numerous examinations by federal and state banking regulators, as well as the SEC, FINRA, and various state insurance and securities regulators. BB&T and its subsidiaries have from time to time received requests for information from regulatory authorities in various states, including state insurance commissions and state attorneys general, securities regulators and other regulatory authorities, concerning their business practices. Such requests are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. Refer to BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for additional disclosures with respect to laws and regulations affecting the Company’s businesses.

 

Basel III

 

On July 2, 2013, the FRB approved final rules that established a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations. These rules established a more conservative definition of capital, including the elimination of trust-preferred securities for certain institutions. The rules also revised the calculation of risk-weighted assets and the minimum capital thresholds. Based on June 30, 2013 financial information, BB&T would be considered a Standardized Approach banking organization and must comply with the new requirements beginning on January 1, 2015. Institutions with greater than $250 billion in assets would be considered an Advanced Approach banking organization, which requires a more conservative calculation of risk-weighted assets, with a compliance date of January 1, 2014. Among other requirements, the minimum required common equity Tier 1 ratio, including the capital conservation buffer, will gradually increase from 4.5% on January 1, 2015 to 7.0% on January 1, 2019.

 

For BB&T, the final rules eased the requirements for determining risk-weighted assets when compared to the previously proposed requirements. Specifically, more conservative risk-weighting of certain residential mortgage loans and the requirement to recognize in capital the value of unrecognized gains and losses in AFS securities were not retained. Additionally, the new rules require that in order to receive Tier 2 capital treatment, subordinated debt must be subordinated to depositors and general creditors of the banking organization. This could reduce BB&T’s total risk based capital ratio if it is determined that BB&T’s existing subordinated debt no longer qualifies as Tier 2 capital as of the rule’s January 1, 2015 effective date.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The accounting and reporting policies of BB&T Corporation and its subsidiaries are in accordance with GAAP and conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. BB&T’s financial position and results of operations are affected by management’s application of accounting policies, including estimates, assumptions and judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues and expenses. Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in BB&T’s consolidated financial position and/or consolidated results of operations and related disclosures. The more critical accounting and reporting policies include BB&T’s accounting for the ACL, determining fair value of financial instruments, intangible assets, costs and benefit obligations associated with BB&T’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, and income taxes. Understanding BB&T’s accounting policies is fundamental to understanding BB&T’s consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations. Accordingly, BB&T’s critical accounting policies are discussed in detail in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. BB&T’s significant accounting policies and changes in accounting principles and effects of new accounting pronouncements are discussed in detail in Note 1 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There have been no changes to BB&T’s significant accounting policies during 2013. Additional disclosures regarding the effects of new accounting pronouncements are included in Note 1 “Basis of Presentation” included herein.

 

Executive Summary

 

Consolidated net income available to common shareholders for the second quarter of 2013 was $547 million, up 7.3%, compared to $510 million earned during the same period in 2012. On a diluted per common share basis, earnings for the second quarter of 2013 were $0.77, up 6.9% compared to $0.72 for the same period in 2012. BB&T’s results of operations for the second quarter of 2013 produced an annualized return on average assets of 1.27% and an annualized return on average common shareholders’ equity of 11.39% compared to prior year ratios of 1.22% and 11.21%, respectively.

 

48

On April 23, 2013, BB&T’s shareholders approved a plan that modified the record date and payment date of preferred stock dividends to align with the record and payment date practices associated with common stock dividends. This action was undertaken in order to achieve administrative and Board-level efficiencies and reduce the costs associated with multiple record dates and multiple payment dates. The implementation of this plan resulted in the declaration of dividends on all classes of preferred stock totaling $13 million, which represented dividend payments for the period from May 1 to May 31, 2013. Based on the number of shares of preferred stock outstanding at June 30, 2013, future quarterly preferred stock dividends are expected to total approximately $37 million if declared by the Board of Directors.

 

Total revenues were $2.5 billion for the second quarter of 2013, an increase of $32 million compared to the second quarter of 2012. The increase in total revenues included an $80 million increase in noninterest income and a $48 million decrease in taxable-equivalent net interest income. The decrease in taxable-equivalent net interest income reflects an $87 million decrease in interest income, primarily driven by lower yields on new loans, which is reflective of the low interest rate environment, and covered loan run-off, partially offset by a $39 million decrease in funding costs compared to the same quarter of the prior year. Net interest margin was 3.70%, down 25 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2012.

 

The increase in noninterest income includes a $33 million increase in insurance income, a $25 million increase in net securities gains, and a $17 million increase in other income, partially offset by a $14 million decrease in mortgage banking income. The increase in insurance income was primarily attributable to firming market conditions for insurance premiums. Net securities gains for the second quarter of 2013 totaled $23 million compared to a net securities loss of $2 million in the second quarter of the prior year. The increase in other income was primarily due to $20 million in higher income related to assets for certain post-employment benefits, which was offset in personnel costs. The $14 million decrease in mortgage banking income was the result of a decrease in gains on residential mortgage loan production and sales, as record volume was more than offset by tighter margins, and a decrease in the net mortgage servicing rights valuation.

 

The provision for credit losses, excluding covered loans, declined $80 million, or 30.9%, compared to the second quarter of 2012, as improving credit quality resulted in lower provision expense. Net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, for the second quarter of 2013 were $110 million lower than the second quarter of 2012, a decline of 33.8%. The reserve release was $36 million for the second quarter of 2013 compared to $66 million in the earlier quarter.

 

Noninterest expense was $1.5 billion for the second quarter of 2013, an increase of $70 million, or 4.9%, compared to the second quarter of 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to a $69 million increase in personnel expense, a $25 million increase in merger-related and restructuring charges, and a $20 million increase in other expense, which were partially offset by decreased foreclosed property expense. The increase in personnel expense was driven by the BankAtlantic acquisition in the third quarter of 2012, an increase in other post-employment benefits, which is offset in other income, and higher production-based incentives and commissions. The increase in merger-related and restructuring charges primarily related to optimization activities related to Community Banking that began during the second quarter, and the increase in other expense was attributable to project-related expenses, higher operating charge-offs, and other various expenses. Foreclosed property expense decreased $60 million, which was the result of lower write-downs, losses and carrying costs associated with foreclosed property.

 

The provision for income taxes was $221 million for the second quarter of 2013, compared to $191 million for the second quarter of 2012. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2013 was 27.7%, compared to 26.2% for the prior year’s second quarter. This increase in the effective tax rate was the result of a $12 million income tax benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2012 related to the termination of a leveraged lease.

 

Nonperforming assets, excluding covered foreclosed real estate, decreased $137 million compared to March 31, 2013, and $260 million compared to December 31, 2012. The decrease in nonperforming assets over the six months ended June 30, 2013 reflects a $231 million reduction in nonperforming loans and leases and a $29 million decline in foreclosed property. At June 30, 2013, nonperforming loans and leases represented 0.99% of total loans and leases, excluding covered assets, which is its lowest level since the first quarter of 2008.

 

Average loans held for investment for the second quarter of 2013 totaled $114.3 billion, up $1.1 billion, or 3.8%, compared to the first quarter of 2013. The growth in average loans held for investment was driven by strong growth in the sales finance and other lending subsidiary portfolios, along with steady growth in the commercial and industrial and direct retail lending portfolios.

 

49

Average deposits for the second quarter of 2013 decreased $454 million, or 1.4%, compared to the prior quarter. While total average deposits declined during the quarter, the mix of the portfolio has continued to improve as average noninterest-bearing deposits grew $1.1 billion while average certificates and other time deposits decreased $900 million during the quarter. The cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.32% for the second quarter of 2013, a decrease of 12 basis points compared to the same period of 2012.

 

Total shareholders’ equity increased $773 million compared to December 31, 2012, which reflects net proceeds of $487 million from the issuance of Tier 1 qualifying non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock in the second quarter, and net income of $832 million offset by common and preferred dividends totaling $322 million and $43 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a $225 million change in AOCI, which primarily reflects a decrease in unrealized net gains on available for sale securities totaling $415 million, and a $162 million decrease in unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges, both of which relate to the increase in certain interest rates during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

The Tier 1 common ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital and total risk-based capital ratios were 9.3%, 11.1% and 13.9% at June 30, 2013, respectively. BB&T’s risk-based capital ratios remain well above regulatory standards for well-capitalized banks. As of June 30, 2013, measures of tangible capital were not required by the regulators and, therefore, were considered non-GAAP measures. Refer to the section titled “Capital Adequacy and Resources” herein for a discussion of how BB&T calculates and uses these measures in the evaluation of the Company and adjustments made to certain regulatory capital ratios previously presented.

 

Refer to BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, for additional information with respect to BB&T’s recent accomplishments and significant challenges.

 

Analysis Of Results Of Operations

 

The following table sets forth selected financial ratios for the last five calendar quarters.

 

Table 1
Annualized Profitability Measures
                                         
        Three Months Ended
                  Adjusted (1)                  
        6/30/13   3/31/13   3/31/13   12/31/12   9/30/12   6/30/12
Rate of return on:                                  
  Average assets  1.27  %    0.57  %    1.20  %    1.20  %    1.10  %    1.22  %
  Average common shareholders’ equity  11.39       4.44       10.34       10.51       9.94       11.21   
NIM (FTE)  3.70       3.76      N/A      3.84       3.94       3.95   
                                         
                                         
(1) Calculated excluding the impact of the $281 million adjustment to income taxes recorded in the first quarter of 2013. For additional information, see Non-GAAP Information on page 80.

 

Consolidated net income available to common shareholders totaled $547 million, which generated diluted earnings per common share of $0.77 in the second quarter of 2013. Net income available to common shareholders for the same period of 2012 totaled $510 million, which generated diluted earnings per common share of $0.72. The increase in earnings was driven by lower funding and credit-related costs, as well as an increase in noninterest income. BB&T’s results of operations for the second quarter produced an annualized return on average assets of 1.27% and an annualized return on average common shareholders’ equity of 11.39%, compared to prior year returns of 1.22% and 11.21%, respectively.

 

Consolidated net income available to common shareholders for the first six months of 2013 totaled $757 million, compared to $941 million earned during the corresponding period of the prior year. Financial results for the first six months of 2013 were negatively impacted by a $281 million adjustment to the provision for income taxes. This occurred following a February 11, 2013 opinion by the U.S. Tax Court with respect to a case between the Bank of New York Mellon and the IRS involving a transaction with a structure similar to a financing transaction entered into by BB&T in 2002. BB&T is currently in litigation with the IRS and no decision has been rendered by the court.

 

50

On a diluted per common share basis, earnings for the first six months of 2013 were $1.06 ($1.46 excluding the tax adjustment) compared to $1.33 earned during the first six months of 2012. BB&T’s results of operations for the first six months of 2013 produced an annualized return on average assets of 0.92% (1.23% adjusted) and an annualized return on average common shareholders’ equity of 7.95% (10.79% adjusted), compared to prior year returns of 1.13% and 10.49%, respectively. See Non-GAAP Information on page 80.

 

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

 

Second Quarter 2013 compared to Second Quarter 2012

 

Net interest income on a FTE basis was $1.5 billion for the second quarter of 2013, a decrease of 3.2% compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in net interest income was driven by an $87 million decrease in interest income, partially offset by a $39 million decrease in funding costs compared to the same quarter of the prior year. For the quarter ended June 30, 2013, average earning assets increased $4.8 billion, or 3.2%, compared to the same period of 2012, while average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $3.8 billion, or 3.1%. The NIM was 3.70% for the second quarter of 2013, compared to 3.95% for the same period of 2012. The 25 basis point decline in the NIM was primarily due to the runoff of covered assets and lower yields on new loans, partially offset by lower funding costs.

 

The annualized FTE yield on the average securities portfolio for the second quarter of 2013 was 2.49%, which was 13 basis points lower than the annualized yield earned during the second quarter of 2012, driven by a decline in the benefit of higher-yielding covered securities.

 

The annualized FTE yield for the total loan portfolio for the second quarter of 2013 was 4.90%, compared to 5.45% in the second quarter of 2012. The decrease in the FTE yield on the total loan portfolio was primarily due to runoff of covered loans and lower yields on new loans due to the continued low interest rate environment.

 

The average rate for interest-bearing deposits for the second quarter of 2013 was 0.32%, compared to 0.44% for the same period in the prior year, reflecting management’s ability to lower rates on nearly all categories of interest-bearing deposit products.

 

For the second quarter of 2013, the average annualized FTE rate paid on short-term borrowings was 0.18% compared to 0.31% during the second quarter of 2012. The average annualized rate paid on long-term debt for the second quarter of 2013 was 3.23%, compared to 2.79% for the same period in 2012. The increase in the average rate paid on long-term debt reflects the impact of $29 million in accelerated amortization and issuance costs in the second quarter of 2012 resulting from the announced redemption of the Company’s trust preferred securities.

 

Management expects NIM to decrease by five to ten basis points in the third quarter of 2013 as a result of lower rates on new earning assets, the runoff of covered loans and tighter retail credit spreads, partially offset by lower deposit costs and anticipated favorable funding and asset mix change.

 

Six Months of 2013 compared to Six Months of 2012

 

Net interest income on a FTE basis was $2.9 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of 2.1% compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in net interest income reflects a $170 million decrease in interest income, which was partially offset by a $108 million decline in funding costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, average earning assets increased $5.5 billion, or 3.6%, compared to the same period of 2012, while average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $3.3 billion, or 2.7%. The net interest margin was 3.73% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 3.94% for the same period of 2012. The 21 basis point decrease in the net interest margin was due to lower yields on new loans and runoff of covered assets, partially offset by lower funding costs.

 

The annualized FTE yield on the average securities portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was 2.48%, which represents a decrease of 18 basis points compared to the annualized yield earned during the same period of 2012, which primarily reflects a change in the mix of the securities portfolio driven by continued runoff of higher yielding securities.

 

51

The annualized FTE yield for the total loan portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was 4.97% compared to 5.50% in the corresponding period of 2012. The decrease in the FTE yield on the total loan portfolio was primarily due to lower yields on new loans due to the low interest-rate environment and the runoff of covered loans.

 

The average cost of interest-bearing deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was 0.34% compared to 0.47% for the same period in the prior year, reflecting management’s ability to lower rates on nearly all categories of interest-bearing deposit products.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the average annualized FTE rate paid on short-term borrowings was 0.18%, a nine basis point decline from the rate paid for the same period of 2012. The average annualized rate paid on long-term debt for the six months of 2013 was 3.23% compared to 3.10% for the same period in 2012. The increase in the average rate paid on long-term debt is due to the prior period positive impact of accelerated amortization from certain derivatives that were unwound in a gain position.

 

The following tables set forth the major components of net interest income and the related annualized yields and rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, as well as the variances between the periods caused by changes in interest rates versus changes in volumes. Changes attributable to the mix of assets and liabilities have been allocated proportionally between the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

 

 

52

 

Table 2-1  
FTE Net Interest Income and Rate / Volume Analysis (1)  
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012  
                                                                 
            Average Balances (6)   Annualized Yield/Rate   Income/Expense   Increase   Change due to  
            2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012    (Decrease)   Rate   Volume  
                                                                 
            (Dollars in millions)  
Assets                                                        
Total securities, at amortized cost (2)                                                        
  GSE securities   $  5,232    $  1,054     1.89  %    1.45  %   $  25    $  4    $  21    $  1    $  20   
  RMBS issued by GSE      27,803       32,176     1.97       1.98         138       160       (22)      (1)      (21)  
  States and political subdivisions      1,836       1,857     5.81       5.85         26       27       (1)      ―         (1)  
  Non-agency RMBS      289       338     5.57       5.76         4       5       (1)      ―         (1)  
  Other securities      466       498     1.51       1.70         1       2       (1)      (1)      ―     
  Covered securities      1,093       1,191     12.48       15.62         34       46       (12)      (8)      (4)  
    Total securities      36,719       37,114     2.49       2.62         228       244       (16)      (9)      (7)  
Other earning assets (3)      2,626       3,511     1.40       0.69         9       6       3       5       (2)  
Loans and leases, net of unearned income (4)(5)                                                        
  Commercial:                                                        
    Commercial and industrial      38,359       36,293     3.67       4.06         351       366       (15)      (35)      20   
    CRE - other      11,411       10,578     3.71       3.79         106       100       6       (2)      8   
    CRE - residential ADC      1,121       1,744     4.30       3.67         12       16       (4)      2       (6)  
  Direct retail lending      15,936       15,071     4.67       4.90         186       184       2       (9)      11   
  Sales finance      8,520       7,690     3.25       4.03         69       77       (8)      (16)      8   
  Revolving credit      2,268       2,178     8.48       8.35         48       45       3       1       2   
  Residential mortgage      23,391       22,114     4.21       4.47         246       247       (1)      (15)      14   
  Other lending subsidiaries      10,407       9,370     10.54       11.17         274       260       14       (15)      29   
    Total loans and leases held for investment (excluding covered loans)      111,413       105,038     4.64       4.95         1,292       1,295       (3)      (89)      86   
  Covered      2,858       4,211     16.95       19.01         121       200       (79)      (20)      (59)  
    Total loans and leases held for investment      114,271       109,249     4.95       5.50         1,413       1,495       (82)      (109)      27   
  LHFS      3,581       2,511     3.42       3.51         30       22       8       (1)      9   
    Total loans and leases      117,852       111,760     4.90       5.45         1,443       1,517       (74)      (110)      36   
    Total earning assets      157,197       152,385     4.28       4.65         1,680       1,767       (87)      (114)      27   
    Nonearning assets      24,637       24,485                                             
      Total assets   $  181,834    $  176,870                                             
                                                                 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                                                        
Interest-bearing deposits:                                                        
  Interest-checking   $  19,276    $  19,911     0.08       0.12         3       6       (3)      (3)      ―     
  Money market and savings      48,140       46,557     0.13       0.19         15       22       (7)      (8)      1   
  Certificates and other time deposits      28,034       31,205     0.84       1.02         60       79       (19)      (11)      (8)  
  Foreign deposits - interest-bearing      947       32     0.09       0.06         ―         ―         ―         ―         ―     
    Total interest-bearing deposits      96,397       97,705     0.32       0.44         78       107       (29)      (22)      (7)  
Short-term borrowings      5,118       3,362     0.18       0.31         2       3       (1)      (2)      1   
Long-term debt      18,287       22,544     3.23       2.79         148       157       (9)      23       (32)  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities      119,802       123,611     0.76       0.87         228       267       (39)      (1)      (38)  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits      33,586       27,643                                             
    Other liabilities      6,657       6,879                                             
    Shareholders’ equity      21,789       18,737                                             
      Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $  181,834    $  176,870                                             
Average interest rate spread                3.52  %    3.78  %                                
NIM/net interest income                3.70  %    3.95  %   $  1,452    $  1,500    $  (48)   $  (113)   $  65   
Taxable-equivalent adjustment                           $  37    $  38                     
                                                                 
                                                                 
(1) Yields are stated on a FTE basis assuming tax rates in effect for the periods presented.  
(2) Total securities include AFS securities and HTM securities.  
(3) Includes Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements or similar arrangements, interest-bearing deposits with banks, trading securities, FHLB stock and other earning assets.  
(4) Loan fees, which are not material for any of the periods shown, have been included for rate calculation purposes.  
(5) Nonaccrual loans have been included in the average balances.  
(6) Excludes basis adjustments for fair value hedges.  

 

53

 

Table 2-2  
FTE Net Interest Income and Rate / Volume Analysis (1)  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012  
                                                                 
            Average Balances (6)   Annualized Yield/Rate   Income/Expense   Increase   Change due to  
            2013   2012    2013   2012    2013   2012    (Decrease)   Rate   Volume  
                                                                 
            (Dollars in millions)  
Assets                                                        
Total securities, at amortized cost (2)                                                        
  GSE securities   $  4,879    $  938     1.88  %    1.49  %   $  46    $  7    $  39    $  2    $  37   
  RMBS issued by GSE      28,169       31,957     1.95       2.09         275       334       (59)      (21)      (38)  
  States and political subdivisions      1,837       1,858     5.80       5.85         53       54       (1)      ―         (1)  
  Non-agency RMBS      294       374     5.57       5.88         8       11       (3)      (1)      (2)  
  Other securities      472       515     1.46       1.67         3       4       (1)      (1)      ―     
  Covered securities      1,109       1,208     12.84       13.29         71       80       (9)      (3)      (6)  
    Total securities      36,760       36,850     2.48       2.66         456       490       (34)      (24)      (10)  
Other earning assets (3)      2,731       3,507     1.53       0.73         21       13       8       11       (3)  
Loans and leases, net of unearned income (4)(5)                                                        
  Commercial:                                                        
    Commercial and industrial      38,139       36,157     3.72       4.05         704       728       (24)      (63)      39   
    CRE - other      11,417       10,628     3.76       3.80         213       201       12       (2)      14   
    CRE - residential ADC      1,179       1,867     4.22       3.62         25       34       (9)      5       (14)  
  Direct retail lending      15,847       14,892     4.70       4.94         370       366       4       (18)      22   
  Sales finance      8,181       7,603     3.38       4.15         137       157       (20)      (31)      11   
  Revolving credit      2,273       2,176     8.49       8.43         96       91       5       1       4   
  Residential mortgage      23,504       21,585     4.23       4.51         497       486       11       (31)      42   
  Other lending subsidiaries      10,198       9,019     10.68       11.34         541       509       32       (31)      63   
    Total loans and leases held for investment (excluding covered loans)      110,738       103,927     4.69       4.97         2,583       2,572       11       (170)      181   
  Covered      2,995       4,442     17.23       19.18         256       424       (168)      (40)      (128)  
    Total loans and leases held for investment      113,733       108,369     5.02       5.55         2,839       2,996       (157)      (210)      53   
  LHFS      3,686       2,713     3.35       3.57         61       48       13       (3)      16   
    Total loans and leases      117,419       111,082     4.97       5.50         2,900       3,044       (144)      (213)      69   
    Total earning assets      156,910       151,439     4.33       4.70         3,377       3,547       (170)      (226)      56   
    Nonearning assets      24,687       23,981                                             
      Total assets   $  181,597    $  175,420                                             
                                                                 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                                                        
Interest-bearing deposits:                                                        
  Interest-checking   $  19,720    $  19,812     0.09       0.13         8       12       (4)      (4)      ―     
  Money market and savings      48,285       46,112     0.14       0.19         33       44       (11)      (13)      2   
  Certificates and other time deposits      28,481       32,073     0.87       1.08         123       172       (49)      (31)      (18)  
  Foreign deposits - interest-bearing      668       72     0.10       0.04         ―         ―         ―         ―         ―     
    Total interest-bearing deposits      97,154       98,069     0.34       0.47         164       228       (64)      (48)      (16)  
Short-term borrowings      4,670       3,407     0.18       0.27         4       4       ―         (1)      1   
Long-term debt      18,488       22,132     3.23       3.10         298       342       (44)      14       (58)  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities      120,312       123,608     0.78       0.93         466       574       (108)      (35)      (73)  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits      33,055       26,908                                             
    Other liabilities      6,677       6,621                                             
    Shareholders’ equity      21,553       18,283                                             
      Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $  181,597    $  175,420                                             
Average interest rate spread                3.55  %    3.77  %                                
NIM/net interest income                3.73  %    3.94  %   $  2,911    $  2,973    $  (62)   $  (191)   $  129   
Taxable-equivalent adjustment                           $  74    $  75                     
                                                                 
                                                                 
(1) Yields are stated on a FTE basis assuming tax rates in effect for the periods presented.  
(2) Total securities include AFS securities and HTM securities.  
(3) Includes Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements or similar arrangements, interest-bearing deposits with banks, trading securities, FHLB stock and other earning assets.  
(4) Loan fees, which are not material for any of the periods shown, have been included for rate calculation purposes.  
(5) Nonaccrual loans have been included in the average balances.  
(6) Excludes basis adjustments for fair value hedges.  

 

54

 

Revenue, Net of Provision Impact from Covered Assets

 

The following tables provide information related to covered loans and securities and the FDIC loss sharing asset as a result of the Colonial acquisition. The tables exclude amounts related to other assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition.

Table 3
FDIC Loss Share Receivable
                                 
          June 30, 2013   December 31, 2012  
  Attributable to:   Carrying Amount   Fair Value   Carrying Amount   Fair Value  
                                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Covered loans   $  960    $  618    $  1,107    $  751   
  Covered securities      (573)      (524)      (553)      (502)  
  Aggregate loss calculation      (88)      (113)      (75)      (100)  
    FDIC loss share receivable   $  299    $  (19)   $  479    $  149   

 

Table 4
Revenue, Net of Provision, Impact from Covered Assets
                               
        Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,  
         2013    2012    2013    2012  
                               
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Interest income-covered loans $  121    $  200    $  256    $  424   
  Interest income-covered securities    34       46       71       80   
    Total interest income    155       246       327       504   
  Provision for covered loans    11       (14)      (14)      (17)  
  OTTI for covered securities    ―         ―         ―         (4)  
  FDIC loss share income, net    (85)      (74)      (144)      (131)  
    Adjusted net revenue $  81    $  158    $  169    $  352   
                               
  FDIC loss share income, net                        
    Offset to provision for covered loans $  (9)   $  11    $  11    $  14   
    Accretion due to credit loss improvement    (66)      (67)      (133)      (124)  
    Offset to OTTI for covered securities    ―         ―         ―         3   
    Accretion for securities    (10)      (18)      (22)      (24)  
      Total $  (85)   $  (74)   $  (144)   $  (131)  

 

Second Quarter 2013 compared to Second Quarter 2012

 

Interest income on covered loans and securities for the second quarter of 2013 decreased $91 million compared to the second quarter of 2012, primarily due to decreased interest income on covered loans of $79 million, reflecting lower average covered loan balances and a lower yield. The yield on covered loans for the second quarter of 2013 was 16.95% compared to 19.01% in 2012. The decline in yield is primarily the result of changes in the remaining loan mix. Interest income on covered securities in the current quarter was $12 million lower than the second quarter of 2012 primarily due to duration adjustments in each quarter.

 

The provision for covered loans was a net recovery totaling $11 million in the second quarter of 2013, an improvement of $25 million compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The improvement in the provision for covered loans was primarily the result of improvements in the cash flows from certain residential mortgage loan pools based on the quarterly reassessment process.

 

FDIC loss share income, net was a negative $85 million for the second quarter of 2013, $11 million worse than the second quarter of 2012, which reflects the offset to the provision for covered loans, partially offset by lower accretion due to duration adjustments on covered securities.

 

55

Six Months of 2013 compared to Six Months of 2012

 

Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 on covered loans and securities decreased $177 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to lower average loan balances and a lower yield. The yield on covered loans for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was 17.23%, compared to 19.18% in the corresponding period of 2012. At June 30, 2013, the accretable yield balance on these loans was $663 million. Accretable yield represents the excess of future cash flows above the current net carrying amount of loans and will be recognized into income over the remaining life of the covered and acquired loans.

 

The provision for covered loans was $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $17 million for the same period of the prior year.

 

FDIC loss share income, net was a negative $144 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to a negative $131 million for the corresponding period of the prior year.

 

Provision for Credit Losses

 

Second Quarter 2013 compared to Second Quarter 2012

 

The provision for credit losses totaled $168 million (including an $11 million net recovery on covered loans) for the second quarter of 2013, compared to $273 million (including $14 million for covered loans) for the second quarter of 2012. The decrease in the overall provision for credit losses was driven by decreases related to the commercial and industrial and direct retail lending portfolios. The improvement in the commercial and industrial portfolio reflects improving loss frequency factors and credit metrics, along with an improved loss outlook related to certain segments of the portfolio. The decrease in the provision for credit losses related to the direct retail lending portfolio was driven by an overall improvement in credit quality trends, loss frequency and loss severity.

 

Net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, were $110 million lower than the second quarter of 2012. This decrease in net charge-offs was broad-based in nature, with notable declines in net charge-offs related to the CRE – residential ADC, commercial and industrial and CRE – other portfolios. Net charge-offs were 0.74% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis (0.75% excluding covered loans) for the second quarter of 2013, compared to 1.21% of average loans and leases (1.22% excluding covered loans) for the same period in 2012. Management expects net charge-offs to trend modestly lower in coming quarters.

 

Six Months of 2013 compared to Six Months of 2012

 

The provision for credit losses totaled $440 million (including $14 million for covered loans) for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $561 million (including $17 million for covered loans) for the same period of 2012. The improvement in the provision for credit losses was driven by decreases in the provision related to direct retail lending and commercial and industrial portfolios totaling $162 million and $107 million, respectively. The decrease in the direct retail lending provision for credit losses reflects improvements in loss frequency and estimated losses related to TDRs, as well as an overall improvement in credit metrics and economic factors considered in the allowance estimation process. The decrease in the provision for credit losses related to the commercial and industrial portfolio primarily reflects improvement in credit metrics and economic factors. The improvements in the provision for credit losses described above were partially offset by increases in certain other loan portfolios, which primarily reflect a normalization of loss factor estimates.

 

Net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $172 million lower than the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease in net charge-offs was broad based, with significant reductions reflected in the CRE – other, CRE – residential ADC and direct retail lending portfolios totaling $63 million, $67 million and $29 million, respectively. Net charge-offs for the other lending subsidiaries portfolio increased modestly when compared to the prior comparable period. Net charge-offs were 0.87% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis (or 0.86% excluding covered loans) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 1.25% of average loans and leases (or 1.25% excluding covered loans) for the same period in 2012.

 

56

Noninterest Income

 

Second Quarter 2013 compared to Second Quarter 2012

 

Noninterest income was $1.0 billion for the second quarter of 2013, an increase of $80 million, or 8.3%, compared to the second quarter of 2012. The increase in noninterest income was driven by increases in insurance income, net securities gains (losses), other income and investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in mortgage banking income compared to the same period of the prior year.

 

Insurance income was $33 million higher, primarily due to firming market conditions for insurance premiums and an experience-based refund of reinsurance premiums totaling $13 million. Net securities gains for the second quarter of 2013 totaled $23 million, compared to a net securities loss of $2 million in the same quarter of the prior year. Other income and investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions increased $17 million and $11 million, respectively, compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The increase in other income was primarily attributable to $20 million in higher income related to assets for certain post-employment benefits, which was offset by higher personnel expense, while the increase in investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions was primarily the result of higher retail investment commission income driven by an increase in assets under management.

 

Mortgage banking income decreased $14 million due to a $7 million decrease in gains on residential mortgage loan production and sales due to tighter margins, and a $5 million decrease in the net mortgage servicing rights valuation.

 

Other categories of noninterest income, including service charges on deposits, bankcard fees and merchant discounts, checkcard fees, trust and investment advisory revenues, income from bank-owned life insurance and FDIC loss share income, totaled $249 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $241 million for the same period of 2012.

 

Six Months of 2013 compared to Six Months of 2012

 

Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $2.0 billion, compared to $1.8 billion for the same period in 2012, an increase of $210 million, or 11.4%. This increase was primarily attributable to increases in insurance income, net securities gains (losses), other income, investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions, bankcard fees and merchant discounts, and checkcard fees. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in mortgage banking income.

 

Insurance income, which is BB&T’s largest source of noninterest income, totaled $791 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, an increase of $127 million compared to the corresponding period of 2012. Approximately $80 million of this increase was driven by the acquisition of Crump Insurance on April 2, 2012. The remainder of the increase reflects firming market conditions for insurance premiums, and a $13 million experience-based refund of reinsurance premiums that was received in the second quarter of 2013.

 

Net securities gains for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $46 million, compared to a net securities loss of $11 million in the corresponding period of the prior year. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $159 million, an increase of $43 million compared to the prior period. This increase was driven by a $17 million decrease in write-downs on affordable housing investments, $16 million in higher income related to assets for certain post-employment benefits, which was offset by higher personnel expense, and $9 million in higher income related to operating leases within the equipment finance leasing business.

 

Investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $193 million, up $16 million, or 9.0%, compared to the corresponding period of the prior year, which reflects higher retail investment commission income driven by an increase in assets under management and higher investment banking income due to increased activity in the fixed income and equity markets. Bankcard fees and merchant discounts and checkcard fees increased $11 million and $10 million, respectively, reflecting increased transaction volumes.

 

Mortgage banking income totaled $348 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $50 million compared to the amount earned in the corresponding period of 2012. This decrease includes a $35 million decrease in net mortgage servicing rights’ valuation adjustments, and a $16 million decrease in gains on residential mortgage loan production and sales.

 

Other categories of noninterest income, including service charges on deposits, trust and investment advisory revenues, income from bank-owned life insurance, and FDIC loss share income totaled $288 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with $292 million for the same period of 2012.

 

57

Noninterest Expense

 

Second Quarter 2013 compared to Second Quarter 2012

 

Noninterest expense was $1.5 billion for the second quarter of 2013, an increase of $70 million, or 4.9%, compared to the second quarter of 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to increases in personnel expense, merger-related and restructuring charges, and other expense, that were partially offset by decreased foreclosed property expense.

 

Personnel expense, the largest component of noninterest expense, totaled $844 million, an increase of $69 million compared to the second quarter of the prior year. This increase in personnel expense was primarily attributable to the BankAtlantic acquisition in the third quarter of 2012, an increase in other post-employment benefits, which is offset in other income, and higher production-based incentives and commissions.

 

Merger-related and restructuring charges totaled $27 million, a $25 million increase compared to the same quarter of 2012. This increase primarily relates to optimization activities related to Community Banking that began during the second quarter. Other expense totaled $233 million, an increase of $20 million compared to the second quarter of 2012. This increase was attributable to higher project-related expenses, operating charge-offs and various other expenses.

 

Foreclosed property expense includes the gain or loss on sale of foreclosed property, valuation adjustments resulting from updated appraisals, and the ongoing expense of maintaining foreclosed properties. Foreclosed property expense for the second quarter of 2013 totaled $12 million, compared to $72 million for the same quarter of the prior year, a decrease of $60 million, or 83.3%. Foreclosed property expense was lower due to fewer losses and write-downs and lower carrying costs as a result of reduced inventory compared to the prior year.

 

Other categories of noninterest expenses, including occupancy and equipment expense, loan-related expense, regulatory charges, professional services, software expense, and amortization of intangibles totaled $380 million for the current quarter compared to $364 million for the same period of 2012.

 

Six Months of 2013 compared to Six Months of 2012

 

Noninterest expenses totaled $2.9 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013, an increase of $99 million, or 3.5%, over the same period a year ago.

 

Personnel expense was $1.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $1.5 billion for the same period in 2012, an increase of $156 million, or 10.4%. While the acquisitions of Crump Insurance and BankAtlantic represent a significant portion of the increase in personnel expense, other factors driving the increase include a $26 million increase in production-related and other incentives, and a $17 million increase in other post-employment benefits, which is mostly offset in other income.

 

Occupancy and equipment expense totaled $341 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, an increase of $29 million, or 9.3%. This increase largely relates to the Crump Insurance and BankAtlantic acquisitions.

 

Foreclosed property expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $30 million, compared to $164 million for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $134 million, or 81.7%. Foreclosed property expense was lower due to fewer losses and write-downs, and lower maintenance costs due to a reduction in inventory compared to the prior year.

 

Regulatory charges totaled $70 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $84 million for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $14 million, or 16.7%, which reflects improved credit quality that led to lower deposit insurance premiums. Merger-related and restructuring charges increased $18 million compared to the prior period, primarily the result of optimization activities related to Community Banking.

 

Other categories of noninterest expenses, including loan-related expense, professional services, software expense, amortization of intangibles, and other expenses, totaled $776 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $732 million for the same period of 2012, an increase of $44 million. This increase was largely driven by systems and process-related enhancements as well as other project-related expenses. Elevated systems and process costs in professional services and other expense are expected to decline in coming quarters driving total noninterest expense lower.

 

58

Provision for Income Taxes

 

Second Quarter 2013 compared to Second Quarter 2012

 

The provision for income taxes was $221 million for the second quarter of 2013, compared to $191 million for the second quarter of 2012. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2013 was 27.7%, compared to 26.2% for the prior year’s second quarter. This increase in the effective tax rate was the result of a $12 million income tax benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2012 related to the termination of a leveraged lease. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2013 is expected to be similar to the effective tax rate for the second quarter.

 

Six Months of 2013 compared to Six Months of 2012

 

The provision for income taxes was $702 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, an increase of $322 million compared to the same period of 2012. BB&T’s effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were 45.8% and 27.9%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was due to the $281 million adjustment to the income tax provision described previously.

 

Refer to Note 11 “Income Taxes” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for a discussion of uncertain tax positions and other tax matters.

 

Segment Results

 

See Note 16 “Operating Segments” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” contained herein and BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, for additional disclosures related to BB&T’s reportable business segments. Fluctuations in noninterest income and noninterest expense incurred directly by the operating segments are more fully discussed in the “Noninterest Income” and “Noninterest Expense” sections above. The following table reflects the net income (loss) for each of BB&T’s operating segments:

 

Table 5  
BB&T Corporation  
Net Income by Reportable Segments  
                             
    Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,    
    2013   2012   2013   2012    
                             
    (Dollars in millions)    
  Community Banking $  209    $  169    $  438    $  265     
  Residential Mortgage Banking    78       70       181       198     
  Dealer Financial Services    59       63       99       122     
  Specialized Lending    68       67       121       124     
  Insurance Services    66       66       96       89     
  Financial Services    71       65       141       129     
  Other, Treasury and Corporate    25       38       (244)      56     
  BB&T Corporation $  576    $  538    $  832    $  983     

 

Second Quarter 2013 compared to Second Quarter 2012

 

Community Banking net income was $209 million in the second quarter of 2013, an increase of $40 million over the second quarter of 2012. Segment net interest income decreased $33 million, primarily due to tighter funding spreads on deposits, partially offset by improvements in deposit mix as a result of growth in noninterest-bearing, money market, and savings deposits, coupled with a decrease in certificates of deposits. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses decreased $79 million. The decrease in provision expense was primarily attributable to lower business and consumer loan charge-offs, partially offset by loan growth during the quarter. Noninterest income increased $21 million, primarily due to higher bankcard fees, merchant discounts, checkcard fees and service charges on deposits. The provision for income taxes was $23 million higher for the second quarter of 2013 compared to the earlier quarter as a result of higher pre-tax income.

 

59

Residential Mortgage Banking net income was $78 million in the second quarter of 2013, an increase of $8 million over the second quarter of 2012. Segment net interest income increased $15 million, which was driven by growth in average residential mortgage loans and higher credit spreads to funding costs when compared to the second quarter of 2012. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses decreased $9 million, primarily the result of lower charge-offs. Noninterest income decreased $11 million, driven by lower gains on mortgage loan production and sales as record production was offset by tighter spreads, and a decrease in the fair value adjustment of net mortgage servicing rights, partially offset by higher residential mortgage loan origination fee income.

 

Dealer Financial Services net income was $59 million in the second quarter of 2013, a decrease of $4 million from the second quarter of 2012. Segment net interest income increased $12 million, primarily due to wider credit spreads and loan growth in the Regional Acceptance Corporation portfolio. Dealer Financial Services grew average loans by 7.5% compared to the second quarter of 2012. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses increased $15 million, primarily the result of an increase in the loss frequency estimates to a more normalized level.

 

Specialized Lending net income was $68 million in the second quarter of 2013, an increase of $1 million over the second quarter of 2012.

 

Insurance Services net income was $66 million in the second quarter of 2013, flat when compared to the second quarter of 2012. Noninterest income growth of $34 million was driven by organic growth in wholesale and retail property and casualty insurance operations as market conditions improved and insurance pricing continued to firm and an experience-based refund of reinsurance premiums totaling $13 million. Higher noninterest income growth was offset by a $32 million increase in noninterest expense, in part the result of higher salary and incentive costs, among other items.

 

Financial Services net income was $71 million, an increase of $6 million over the second quarter of 2012. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses increased $22 million, primarily due to higher reserves related to the expansion of the large corporate loan portfolio. Financial Services continues to generate significant loan growth, with Corporate Banking’s average loan balances increasing $1.7 billion or 31.4% over the prior period, while BB&T Wealth’s average loan balances increased $232 million or 20.4%. Noninterest income increased $13 million, driven by higher investment banking fees and commissions and trust and investment advisory fees. Growth in these fees was attributable to improved financial market conditions and increased market value of assets under management. Noninterest expense decreased $17 million, primarily due to an operating charge-off in the prior year.

 

The Other, Treasury & Corporate segment generated net income of $25 million in the second quarter of 2013, compared to net income of $38 million in the second quarter of 2012. Segment net interest income decreased $52 million, primarily attributable to continued runoff in the covered loan portfolio. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses decreased $58 million, primarily due to a reduction in the unallocated allowance for credit losses based on continued improvement in credit trends. Noninterest income increased $20 million, driven by securities gains on the investment portfolio. The $48 million increase in noninterest expense was driven by higher personnel expense, project-related costs, and restructuring expense.

 

Six Months of 2013 compared to Six Months of 2012

 

Community Banking net income was $438 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $265 million in same period of the prior year. Segment net interest income decreased $65 million primarily as a result of tighter funding spreads earned on deposits partially offset by improvements in deposit mix as a result of growth in noninterest-bearing deposits, money market and savings deposits, and a decrease in certificates of deposits. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses decreased $251 million, reflecting reserve rate adjustments driven by improvements in credit metrics in the CRE portfolios and improved TDR loss factors in the direct retail lending portfolio, and a lower level of business and consumer loan charge-offs. Noninterest income increased $31 million primarily due to higher checkcard fees, bankcard fees, merchant discounts, and service charges on deposits. Noninterest expense decreased $55 million, primarily driven by lower foreclosed property and regulatory expense.

 

Residential Mortgage Banking net income was $181 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $198 million in the same period of the prior year. Segment net interest income increased $34 million which was driven by growth in average residential mortgage loans, as well as higher credit spreads to funding costs. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses increased $30 million, which reflects an increase in the current period related to higher TDR loss factors, and a beneficial reserve rate update in the prior period that was driven by decreasing loss severity. Noninterest income decreased $45 million, driven by a decrease in the fair value adjustment of net mortgage servicing rights and lower gains on mortgage loan production, partially offset by higher production fees. Noninterest expense decreased $19 million primarily due to lower foreclosed property expense and lower expense associated with mortgage repurchase reserves.

 

60

Dealer Financial Services net income was $99 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $122 million in the same period of the prior year. Segment net interest income increased $19 million, primarily the result of wider credit spreads and loan growth in the Regional Acceptance Corporation portfolio. Dealer Financial Services grew average loans for the six months ended June 30, 2013 by 5.6% compared to the same period of the year. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses increased $55 million, primarily related to an increase in the allocated provision associated with the Regional Acceptance Corporation loan portfolio that resulted from a change in loan composition and the resulting estimated loan losses.

 

Specialized Lending net income was $121 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $124 million in the same period of the prior year. Segment net interest income grew $24 million, which was primarily attributable to 37.2% growth in average small ticket consumer finance loan balances. This increase primarily resulted from organic loan growth arising from existing dealer financing relationships. In addition, the average commercial finance portfolio grew 14.9% while the average commercial insurance premium financing portfolio grew 9.3% compared to the same period of the prior year. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses increased $29 million primarily due to higher charge-offs in the commercial finance portfolio and a reserve rate adjustment related Lendmark Financial, which was the result of an increase in the volume of TDRs and impaired loans.

 

Insurance Services net income was $96 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $89 million in the same period of the prior year. Noninterest income was $130 million higher than the first six months of 2012, with approximately $80 million of this increase attributable to the acquisition of Crump Insurance on April 2, 2012. The remainder of the increase was driven by organic growth in wholesale and retail property and casualty insurance operations as insurance pricing continues to firm and an experience-based refund of reinsurance premiums totaling $13 million. Higher noninterest income growth was offset by a $108 million increase in noninterest expense, primarily the result of higher personnel costs related to the Crump Insurance acquisition and performance-based incentives.

 

Financial Services net income was $141 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $129 million in the same period of the prior year. The allocated provision for loan and lease losses increased $15 million primarily due to higher reserves related to the expansion of the large corporate loan portfolio. Average loan growth for the segment was 28.8% compared to the prior year. Noninterest income increased $11 million, driven by higher investment banking fees and commissions and trust and investment advisory revenues. Noninterest expense decreased $19 million, primarily due to an operating charge-off in the prior year.

 

Net income in Other, Treasury & Corporate can vary due to changing needs of the Corporation, including the size of the investment portfolio, the need for wholesale funding, and income received from derivatives used to hedge the balance sheet. Other, Treasury & Corporate generated a net loss of $244 million in the first six months of 2013, primarily the result of the previously described $281 million adjustment to the income tax provision related to an unresolved disputed tax liability. Segment net interest income decreased $76 million primarily attributable to runoff in the covered loan portfolio. The $79 million increase in noninterest income was driven by higher securities gains in the investment portfolio and lower losses on affordable housing partnership investments compared to the prior year.

 

Analysis Of Financial Condition

 

Investment Activities

 

The total securities portfolio was $38.2 billion at June 30, 2013, a decrease of $503 million, compared with December 31, 2012. As of June 30, 2013, the securities portfolio included $24.5 billion of AFS securities and $13.8 billion of HTM securities.

 

The effective duration of the securities portfolio increased to 5.0 years at June 30, 2013, compared to 2.8 years at December 31, 2012, primarily the result of an increase in interest rates during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The duration of the securities portfolio excludes equity securities, auction rate securities and certain non-agency RMBS that were acquired in the Colonial acquisition.

 

See Note 2 “Securities” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” herein for additional disclosures related to BB&T’s evaluation of securities for OTTI.

 

61

Lending Activities

 

For the second quarter of 2013, average total loans were $117.9 billion, an increase of $871 million, or 3.0%, compared to the prior quarter. Average loans held for investment were $114.3 billion for the second quarter of 2013, a 3.8% annualized increase compared to $113.2 billion for the first quarter. The increase in average loans held for investment was driven by strong growth in the sales finance and other lending subsidiary portfolios, along with steady growth in the commercial and industrial and direct retail lending portfolios. The growth in these portfolios was partially offset by continued runoff of the CRE – residential ADC, residential mortgage and covered loan portfolios.

 

Average loan growth for the third quarter of 2013 is expected to be in the range of 2% to 4% on an annualized basis compared to the second quarter of 2013, contingent on overall economic conditions remaining relatively stable.

 

The following table presents the composition of average loans and leases:
                                     
  Table 6  
  Composition of Average Loans and Leases  
                                     
        For the Three Months Ended  
        6/30/13   3/31/13   12/31/12   9/30/12   6/30/12  
                                     
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                              
    Commercial and industrial $  38,359    $  37,916    $  38,022    $  37,516    $  36,293   
    CRE - other    11,411       11,422       11,032       10,823       10,578   
    CRE - residential ADC    1,121       1,238       1,398       1,534       1,744   
  Direct retail lending    15,936       15,757       15,767       15,520       15,071   
  Sales finance    8,520       7,838       7,724       7,789       7,690   
  Revolving credit    2,268       2,279       2,280       2,234       2,178   
  Residential mortgage    23,391       23,618       23,820       23,481       22,114   
  Other lending subsidiaries    10,407       9,988       10,051       9,998       9,370   
    Total average loans and leases held for                              
      investment (excluding covered loans)    111,413       110,056       110,094       108,895       105,038   
  Covered    2,858       3,133       3,477       3,826       4,211   
    Total average loans and leases held                              
      for investment    114,271       113,189       113,571       112,721       109,249   
  LHFS    3,581       3,792       3,532       2,888       2,511   
    Total average loans and leases $  117,852    $  116,981    $  117,103    $  115,609    $  111,760   

 

 

Average commercial and industrial loans increased $443 million, or 4.7% on an annualized basis, compared to the prior quarter, driven by increased market penetration in certain geographical areas including Texas, Florida and Alabama, an increase in tax-exempt financing to hospitals and other non-profit entities, and continued growth in asset-based lending. The average CRE – other portfolio was essentially flat compared to the prior quarter, while average CRE – residential ADC loans decreased $117 million, an annualized 37.9%, reflecting continued weakness in the ADC market.

 

The average direct retail lending portfolio increased $179 million, or 4.6% on an annualized basis, driven by higher levels of first lien refinance transactions. Growth in the average sales finance loan portfolio totaled $682 million, or 34.9% annualized, based on the strength of demand in both the consumer and wholesale segments of the prime automobile lending market. Average residential mortgage loans declined $227 million, or an annualized 3.9%, compared to the prior quarter, as the majority of residential mortgage loan production is directed to the held for sale portfolio. Average loans in other lending subsidiaries increased $419 million, or 16.8% on an annualized basis, primarily the result of continued growth in small ticket consumer finance and seasonal growth in the insurance premium financing loan portfolio.

 

Average LHFS decreased $211 million, reflecting a decline of $179 million in residential LHFS and $32 million in commercial LHFS.

 

62

Asset Quality

 

BB&T’s asset quality continued to improve during the second quarter of 2013. NPAs, which includes foreclosed real estate, repossessions, nonaccrual loans and nonperforming TDRs, totaled $1.5 billion (or $1.3 billion excluding covered foreclosed property) at June 30, 2013, compared to $1.8 billion (or $1.5 billion excluding covered foreclosed property) at December 31, 2012. The 16.9% decrease in NPAs, excluding covered foreclosed property, was driven by a $231 million decrease in nonaccrual loans and a $29 million decline in foreclosed real estate and other foreclosed property. NPAs have decreased for 13 consecutive quarters and are at their lowest level since March 31, 2008. Refer to Table 7 for an analysis of the changes in nonperforming assets during the six months ended June 30, 2013. NPAs as a percentage of loans and leases plus foreclosed property were 1.23% at June 30, 2013 (or 1.10% excluding covered assets) compared with 1.51% (or 1.33% excluding covered assets) at December 31, 2012.

 

The current inventory of foreclosed real estate, excluding covered assets, totaled $89 million as of June 30, 2013. This includes land and lots, which totaled $20 million and had been held for approximately 14 months on average. The remaining foreclosed real estate of $69 million, which is primarily single family residential and CRE, had an average holding period of four months.

 

Management expects NPAs to improve at a modest pace during the third quarter of 2013, assuming no significant economic deterioration during the quarter.

 

The following table presents the changes in NPAs, excluding covered foreclosed property, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

Table 7
Rollforward of NPAs
                       
              Six Months Ended June 30,  
              2013   2012  
                         
              (Dollars in millions)  
  Balance at January 1, $  1,536    $  2,450   
    New NPAs    914       1,334   
    Advances and principal increases    95       84   
    Disposals of foreclosed assets    (275)      (468)  
    Disposals of NPLs (1)    (203)      (380)  
    Charge-offs and losses    (329)      (545)  
    Payments    (345)      (355)  
    Transfers to performing status    (117)      (222)  
    Other, net    ―         (1)  
  Balance at June 30, $  1,276    $  1,897   
                         
                         
(1) Includes charge-offs and losses recorded upon sale of $45 million and $108 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Tables 8 and 9 summarize asset quality information for the last five quarters. As more fully described below, this information has been adjusted to exclude past due covered loans and certain mortgage loans guaranteed by the government:

 

·In accordance with regulatory reporting standards, covered loans that are contractually past due are recorded as past due and still accruing based on the number of days past due. However, given the significant amount of acquired loans that are past due but still accruing due to the application of the accretion method, BB&T has concluded that it is appropriate to adjust Table 8 to exclude covered loans in summarizing total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing and total loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing.

 

·BB&T has also concluded that the inclusion of covered loans in certain asset quality ratios summarized in Table 9 including “Loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing as a percentage of total loans and leases,” “Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of total loans and leases,” “NPLs as a percentage of total loans and leases” and certain other asset quality ratios that reflect NPAs in the numerator or denominator (or both) results in significant distortion to these ratios. In addition, because loan level charge-offs related to the acquired loans are not recognized in the financial statements until the cumulative amounts exceed the original loss projections on a pool basis, the net charge-off ratio for the acquired loans is not consistent with the net charge-off ratio for other loan portfolios. The inclusion of these loans in the asset quality ratios described above could result in a lack of

 

63

comparability across quarters or years, and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios that were not impacted by acquisition accounting. BB&T believes that the presentation of asset quality measures excluding covered loans and related amounts from both the numerator and denominator provides better perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of its loan portfolio. Accordingly, the asset quality measures in Table 9 present asset quality information both on a consolidated basis as well as excluding the covered assets and related amounts.

 

·In addition, BB&T has excluded mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the government, primarily FHA/VA loans, from the asset quality metrics reflected in Tables 8 and 9, as these loans are recoverable through various government guarantees. In addition, BB&T has recorded certain amounts related to delinquent GNMA loans serviced for others that BB&T has the option, but not the obligation, to repurchase and has effectively regained control. The amount of government guaranteed mortgage loans and GNMA loans serviced for others that have been excluded are noted in the footnotes to Table 8.

 

64

 

The following tables summarize asset quality information for the past five quarters:
                                   
  Table 8
  Asset Quality
                                   
        Three Months Ended
        6/30/2013   3/31/2013   12/31/2012   9/30/2012   6/30/2012
                                   
        (Dollars in millions)
NPAs (1)                            
  Nonaccrual loans and leases:                            
    Commercial:                            
      Commercial and industrial $  457    $  533    $  546    $  597    $  620 
      CRE - other    181       188       212       259       301 
      CRE - residential ADC    65       94       128       204       241 
    Direct retail lending    119       127       132       134       133 
    Sales finance    5       6       7       7       13 
    Residential mortgage    254       255       269       266       263 
    Other lending subsidiaries    68       80       86       73       76 
  Total nonaccrual loans and leases held for investment    1,149       1,283       1,380       1,540       1,647 
  Foreclosed real estate (2)    89       88       107       139       221 
  Other foreclosed property    38       42       49       39       29 
    Total NPAs (excluding covered assets) (1)(2) $  1,276    $  1,413    $  1,536    $  1,718    $  1,897 
                                   
Performing TDRs (3)                            
    Commercial:                            
      Commercial and industrial $  59    $  54    $  77    $  66    $  62 
      CRE - other    61       67       67       75       78 
      CRE - residential ADC    26       24       21       25       28 
    Direct retail lending    188       193       197       120       114 
    Sales finance    17       19       19       7       7 
    Revolving credit    53       55       56       58       58 
    Residential mortgage (4)    726       715       769       646       636 
    Other lending subsidiaries    183       162       121       77       69 
  Total performing TDRs (3)(4)(5) $  1,313    $  1,289    $  1,327    $  1,074    $  1,052 
                                   
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing                            
    Commercial:                            
      Commercial and industrial $  3    $  ―      $  1    $  1    $  2 
    Direct retail lending    30       34       38       41       39 
    Sales finance    5       7       10       11       11 
    Revolving credit    13       14       16       14       13 
    Residential mortgage (6)(7)    68       77       92       80       78 
    Other lending subsidiaries    4       6       10       5       4 
  Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing (excluding                            
    covered loans) (6)(7)(8) $  123    $  138    $  167    $  152    $  147 
                                   
Loans 30-89 days past due                            
    Commercial:                            
      Commercial and industrial $  32    $  34    $  42    $  41    $  53 
      CRE - other    10       10       12       9       16 
      CRE - residential ADC    2       2       2       8       9 
    Direct retail lending    123       136       145       136       119 
    Sales finance    47       42       56       53       49 
    Revolving credit    20       20       23       21       20 
    Residential mortgage (9)(10)    465       529       498       501       423 
    Other lending subsidiaries    241       183       290       259       218 
  Total loans 30 - 89 days past due (excluding covered loans) (9)(10)(11) $  940    $  956    $  1,068    $  1,028    $  907 

 

 

 

(1)Covered loans are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method. Covered loans that are contractually past due are noted in the footnotes below.
65
(2)Excludes covered foreclosed real estate totaling $181 million, $232 million, $254 million, $289 million, and $310 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively.
(3)Excludes TDRs that are nonperforming totaling $211 million, $222 million, $231 million, $225 million and $219 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively. These amounts are included in total nonperforming assets.
(4)Excludes mortgage TDRs that are government guaranteed totaling $367 million, $338 million, $315 million, $275 million and $266 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively. Includes mortgage TDRs held for sale.
(5)During the fourth quarter of 2012, $226 million of performing loans were classified as TDRs in connection with recent regulatory guidance related to loans discharged in bankruptcy not reaffirmed by the borrower.
(6)Excludes mortgage loans 90 days or more past due that are government guaranteed totaling $246 million, $251 million, $254 million, $233 million and $217 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively. Includes past due mortgage loans held for sale.
(7)Excludes mortgage loans guaranteed by GNMA that BB&T does not have the obligation to repurchase that are 90 days or more past due totaling $492 million, $514 million, $517 million, $499 million and $453 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively.
(8)Excludes covered loans past due 90 days or more totaling $401 million, $371 million, $442 million, $476 million and $613 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively.
(9)Excludes mortgage loans past due 30-89 days that are government guaranteed totaling $103 million, $95 million, $96 million, $95 million and $94 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively. Includes past due mortgage loans held for sale.
(10)Excludes mortgage loans guaranteed by GNMA that BB&T does not have the obligation to repurchase that are past due 30-89 days totaling $5 million, $5 million, $5 million, $6 million and $5 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively.
(11)Excludes covered loans past due 30-89 days totaling $102 million, $120 million, $135 million, $173 million and $199 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively.

 

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest, excluding government guaranteed loans and loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements, totaled $123 million at June 30, 2013, compared with $167 million at December 31, 2012, a decline of 26.3%. Loans 30-89 days past due, excluding government guaranteed loans and covered loans, totaled $940 million at June 30, 2013, which was a decline of $128 million, or 12.0%, compared with $1.1 billion at December 31, 2012.

 

 

66

 

  Table 9
  Asset Quality Ratios
                                   
        As of / For the Three Months Ended
        6/30/2013   3/31/2013   12/31/2012   9/30/2012   6/30/2012
Asset Quality Ratios (including covered assets)                            
  Loans 30 - 89 days past due and still accruing as a                            
    percentage of total loans and leases (1)(2)  0.88  %    0.91  %    1.02  %    1.02  %    0.97  %
  Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a                            
    percentage of total loans and leases (1)(2)  0.44       0.43       0.52       0.53       0.67   
  NPLs as a percentage of total loans and leases  0.97       1.09       1.17       1.31       1.45   
  NPAs as a percentage of:                            
    Total assets  0.80       0.91       0.97       1.10       1.24   
    Loans and leases plus foreclosed property  1.23       1.39       1.51       1.70       1.93   
  Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases  0.74       1.00       1.02       1.05       1.21   
  ALLL as a percentage of loans and leases held for investment  1.64       1.73       1.76       1.80       1.91   
  Ratio of ALLL to:                            
    Net charge-offs  2.18  x    1.69  x    1.69  x    1.69  x    1.57  x
    Nonperforming loans and leases held for investment  1.66       1.54       1.46       1.33       1.29   
                                   
Asset Quality Ratios (excluding covered assets) (3)                            
  Loans 30 - 89 days past due and still accruing as a                            
    percentage of total loans and leases (1)(2)  0.81  %    0.83  %    0.93  %    0.90  %    0.83  %
  Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a                            
    percentage of total loans and leases (1)(2)  0.11       0.12       0.15       0.13       0.13   
  NPLs as a percentage of total loans and leases  0.99       1.12       1.20       1.35       1.50   
  NPAs as a percentage of:                            
    Total assets  0.71       0.80       0.85       0.97       1.09   
    Loans and leases plus foreclosed property  1.10       1.23       1.33       1.51       1.72   
  Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases  0.75       0.98       1.04       1.08       1.22   
  ALLL as a percentage of loans and leases held for investment  1.57       1.65       1.70       1.73       1.86   
  Ratio of ALLL to:                            
    Net charge-offs  2.07  x    1.65  x    1.60  x    1.59  x    1.52  x
    Nonperforming loans and leases held for investment  1.55       1.43       1.37       1.24       1.21   

 

                                                                                                                                                  As of/For the
                          Six Months Ended
                           June 30,
                           2013    2012
Asset Quality Ratios                          
  Including covered loans:            
    Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases    0.87  %    1.25  %
    Ratio of ALLL to net charge-offs    1.87  x    1.53  x
  Excluding covered loans:            
    Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases    0.86  %    1.25  %
    Ratio of ALLL to net charge-offs    1.80  x    1.49  x

 

 

Applicable ratios are annualized.

(1)Excludes mortgage loans guaranteed by GNMA that BB&T does not have the obligation to repurchase. Refer to the footnotes of Table 8 for amounts related to these loans.
(2)Excludes mortgage loans guaranteed by the government. Refer to the footnotes of Table 8 for amounts related to these loans.
(3)These asset quality ratios have been adjusted to remove the impact of covered loans and covered foreclosed property. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected in the calculation of these ratios. Management believes the inclusion of covered loans in certain asset quality ratios that include nonperforming assets, past due loans or net charge-offs in the numerator or denominator results in distortion of these ratios and they may not be comparable to other periods presented or to other portfolios that were not impacted by purchase accounting.

 

67

BB&T’s potential problem loans include loans on nonaccrual status or past due as disclosed in Table 8. In addition, for its commercial portfolio segment, loans that are rated special mention or substandard performing are closely monitored by management as potential problem loans. Refer to Note 3 “Loans and ACL” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” herein for additional disclosures related to these potential problem loans.

 

Certain of BB&T’s residential mortgage loans have an initial period where the borrower is only required to pay the periodic interest. After the interest period, the loan will require the payment of both interest and principal over the remaining term. At June 30, 2013, approximately 7.4% of the outstanding balances of residential mortgage loans were in the interest-only phase, compared to 8.1% at December 31, 2012. Approximately 59.7% of the interest-only balances will begin amortizing within the next three years. Approximately 4.2% of interest-only loans are 30 days or more past due and still accruing and 1.7% are on nonaccrual status.

 

BB&T’s home equity lines, which are a component of the direct retail portfolio, generally require the payment of interest only during the first 15 years after origination. After this initial period, the outstanding balance begins amortizing and requires the payment of both interest and principal. At June 30, 2013, approximately 66.1% of the outstanding balance of home equity lines was in the interest-only phase. Approximately 7.6% of these balances will begin amortizing at various dates through December 31, 2016. The delinquency rate of interest-only lines is similar to amortizing lines.

 

TDRs occur when a borrower is experiencing, or is expected to experience, financial difficulties in the near-term. As a result, BB&T will work with the borrower to prevent further difficulties, and ultimately to improve the likelihood of recovery on the loan. To facilitate this process, a concessionary modification that would not otherwise be considered may be granted resulting in classification of the loan as a TDR. Refer to Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for additional policy information regarding TDRs.

 

BB&T’s performing TDRs, excluding government guaranteed mortgage loans, totaled $1.3 billion at June 30, 2013, a decrease of $14 million, or 1.1%, compared with December 31, 2012. Performing TDRs declined in most loan portfolios, with notable declines in the commercial and industrial and residential mortgage loan portfolios of $18 million and $43 million, respectively, largely due to the removal of TDRs due to sustained performance under the modified terms. Performing TDRs in the other lending subsidiary portfolio increased $62 million compared to December 31, 2012, largely arising from Regional Acceptance Corporation. The following table provides a summary of performing TDR activity during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

Table 10
Rollforward of Performing TDRs
                         
              Six Months Ended June 30,  
              2013   2012  
                         
              (Dollars in millions)  
  Balance at January 1, $  1,327    $  1,109   
    Inflows    251       209   
    Payments and payoffs    (104)      (71)  
    Charge-offs    (21)      (19)  
    Transfers to nonperforming TDRs, net    (33)      (43)  
    Removal due to the passage of time    (82)      (104)  
    Non-concessionary re-modifications    (25)      (29)  
  Balance at June 30, $  1,313    $  1,052   

 

Payments and payoffs represent cash received from borrowers in connection with scheduled principal payments, prepayments and payoffs of amounts outstanding at the maturity date of the loan. Transfers to nonperforming TDRs represent loans that no longer meet the requirements necessary to reflect the loan in accruing status and as a result are subsequently classified as a nonperforming TDR.

 

68

 

The following table provides further details regarding the payment status of restructurings outstanding at June 30, 2013:
                                               
Table 11
TDRs
                                               
         June 30, 2013
                    Past Due   Past Due      
        Current Status   30-89 Days (1)   90 Days Or More (1)   Total
                                               
        (Dollars in millions)
Performing TDRs:                                        
  Commercial loans:                                        
    Commercial and industrial $  59     100.0  %   $  ―       ―    %   $  ―       ―    %   $  59 
    CRE - other    61     100.0         ―       ―           ―       ―           61 
    CRE - residential ADC    26     100.0         ―       ―           ―       ―           26 
  Direct retail lending    176     93.6         10     5.3         2     1.1         188 
  Sales finance    16     94.1         1     5.9         ―       ―           17 
  Revolving credit    43     81.1         5     9.5         5     9.4         53 
  Residential mortgage (2)    611     84.2         99     13.6         16     2.2         726 
  Other lending subsidiaries    158     86.3         25     13.7         ―       ―           183 
    Total performing TDRs (2)    1,150     87.6         140     10.7         23     1.7         1,313 
Nonperforming TDRs (3)    56     26.5         25     11.9         130     61.6         211 
    Total TDRs (2) $  1,206     79.2      $  165     10.8      $  153     10.0      $  1,524 
                                               
(1)Past due performing TDRs are included in past due disclosures.
(2)Excludes mortgage TDRs that are government guaranteed totaling $367 million.
(3)Nonperforming TDRs are included in nonaccrual loan disclosures.

 

Allowance for Credit Losses

 

The ACL, which consists of the ALLL and the RUFC, totaled $2.0 billion at June 30, 2013, a decline of $66 million compared to December 31, 2012. The ALLL amounted to 1.64% of loans and leases held for investment at June 30, 2013 (1.57% excluding covered loans), compared to 1.76% (1.70% excluding covered loans) at year-end 2012. The decrease in the ALLL as a percentage of loans and leases reflects continued improvement in the credit quality of the loan portfolio. The percentage of the allowance for impaired loans to their recorded investment increased from 15.0% at December 31, 2012 to 16.0% at June 30, 2013, primarily due to an increase for residential mortgage loans. The ratio of the ALLL to nonperforming loans held for investment, excluding covered loans, was 1.55x at June 30, 2013 compared to 1.37x at December 31, 2012.

 

BB&T monitors the performance of its home equity loans and lines secured by second liens similar to other consumer loans and utilizes assumptions specific to these loans in determining the necessary allowance. BB&T also receives notification when the first lien holder, whether BB&T or another financial institution, has initiated foreclosure proceedings against the borrower. When notified that the first lien holder is in the process of foreclosure, BB&T obtains valuations to determine if any additional charge-offs or reserves are warranted. These valuations are updated at least annually thereafter.

 

BB&T has limited ability to monitor the delinquency status of the first lien unless the first lien is held or serviced by BB&T. As a result, using migration assumptions that are based on historical experience adjusted for current trends, BB&T estimates the volume of second lien positions where the first lien is delinquent and appropriately adjusts the allowance to reflect the increased risk of loss on these credits. Finally, BB&T also provides additional reserves to second lien positions when the estimated combined current loan to value ratio exceeds 100%. As of June 30, 2013, BB&T held or serviced the first lien on 36% of its second lien positions.

 

BB&T’s net charge-offs totaled $217 million for the second quarter of 2013 and amounted to 0.74% of average loans and leases (or 0.75% excluding covered loans), compared to $289 million, or 1.00% of average loans and leases (or 0.98% excluding covered loans), in the prior quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net charge-offs were $506 million and amounted to 0.87% of average loans and leases (or 0.86% excluding covered loans), compared to $689 million, or 1.25% of average loans and leases (1.25% excluding covered loans), in the same period of 2012. Management expects the level of net charge-offs to trend modestly lower in coming quarters.

 

69

Charge-offs related to covered loans represent realized losses in certain acquired loan pools that exceed the amounts originally estimated at the acquisition date. This impairment, which is subject to the loss sharing agreements, was provided for in prior quarters and therefore the charge-offs have no impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

Refer to Note 3 “Allowance for Credit Losses” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional disclosures.

 

The following table presents an allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. This allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses is calculated on an approximate basis and is not necessarily indicative of future losses or allocations. The entire amount of the allowance is available to absorb losses occurring in any category of loans and leases.

 

  Table 12  
  Allocation of ALLL by Category  
                             
      June 30, 2013   December 31, 2012  
            % Loans         % Loans  
            in each         in each  
      Amount   category   Amount   category  
                             
        (Dollars in millions)  
  Commercial:                        
    Commercial and industrial $  459     33.4  %   $  470     33.4  %  
    CRE - other    202     9.9         204     10.0     
    CRE - residential ADC    68     0.9         100     1.1     
  Direct retail lending    218     13.9         300     13.8     
  Sales finance    42     7.6         29     6.8     
  Revolving credit    113     2.0         102     2.0     
  Residential mortgage    329     20.5         328     21.2     
  Other lending subsidiaries    304     9.4         277     8.8     
  Covered    126     2.4         128     2.9     
  Unallocated    40     ―           80     ―       
    Total ALLL    1,901     100.0  %      2,018     100.0  %  
    RUFC    81             30         
    Total ACL $  1,982          $  2,048         

 

70

 

Information related to BB&T’s ACL is presented in the following table:

 

Table 13  
Analysis of ACL  
                                     
        Three Months Ended  
        6/30/2013   3/31/2013   12/31/2012   9/30/2012   6/30/2012  
                                     
          (Dollars in millions)  
Beginning balance $  2,031    $  2,048    $  2,096    $  2,157    $  2,221   
Provision for credit losses (excluding covered loans)    179       247       256       244       259   
Provision for covered loans    (11)      25       (4)      ―         14   
  Charge-offs:                              
    Commercial loans and leases                              
      Commercial and industrial    (70)      (91)      (98)      (84)      (92)  
      CRE - other    (30)      (36)      (41)      (40)      (51)  
      CRE - residential ADC    (19)      (20)      (27)      (35)      (74)  
    Direct retail lending    (42)      (42)      (54)      (57)      (56)  
    Sales finance    (5)      (6)      (7)      (5)      (7)  
    Revolving credit    (20)      (21)      (19)      (20)      (20)  
    Residential mortgage    (16)      (33)      (29)      (35)      (30)  
    Other lending subsidiaries    (61)      (68)      (60)      (58)      (47)  
    Covered loans    (2)      (14)      (5)      (2)      (12)  
  Total charge-offs    (265)      (331)      (340)      (336)      (389)  
                                     
  Recoveries:                              
    Commercial loans and leases                              
      Commercial and industrial    10       7       5       4       4   
      CRE - other    7       4       4       3       3   
      CRE - residential ADC    3       6       8       2       23   
    Direct retail lending    10       8       9       9       8   
    Sales finance    2       2       3       2       2   
    Revolving credit    5       5       4       5       4   
    Residential mortgage    1       1       1       ―         1   
    Other lending subsidiaries    10       9       6       6       7   
  Total recoveries    48       42       40       31       52   
Net charge-offs    (217)      (289)      (300)      (305)      (337)  
  Ending balance $  1,982    $  2,031    $  2,048    $  2,096    $  2,157   
                                     
ALLL (excluding covered loans) $  1,775    $  1,836    $  1,890    $  1,914    $  1,987   
Allowance for covered loans    126       139       128       137       139   
RUFC    81       56       30       45       31   
  Total ACL $  1,982    $  2,031    $  2,048    $  2,096    $  2,157   

 

71

 

            Six Months Ended  
            June 30,  
            2013     2012  
                     
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Beginning balance $  2,048    $  2,285   
  Provision for credit losses (excluding covered loans)    426       544   
  Provision for covered loans    14       17   
    Charge-offs:            
      Commercial loans and leases            
        Commercial and industrial    (161)      (155)  
        Commercial real estate - other    (66)      (124)  
        Commercial real estate - residential ADC    (39)      (128)  
      Direct retail lending    (84)      (113)  
      Sales finance    (11)      (14)  
      Revolving credit    (41)      (42)  
      Residential mortgage    (49)      (72)  
      Other lending subsidiaries    (129)      (107)  
      Covered loans    (16)      (27)  
    Total charge-offs    (596)      (782)  
                     
    Recoveries:            
      Commercial loans and leases            
        Commercial and industrial    17       8   
        Commercial real estate - other    11       6   
        Commercial real estate - residential ADC    9       31   
      Direct retail lending    18       18   
      Sales finance    4       5   
      Revolving credit    10       9   
      Residential mortgage    2       2   
      Other lending subsidiaries    19       14   
    Total recoveries    90       93   
  Net charge-offs    (506)      (689)  
    Ending balance $  1,982    $  2,157   

 

Deposits

 

The following table presents the composition of average deposits for the last five quarters:

 

  Table 14  
  Composition of Average Deposits  
                                   
      For the Three Months Ended  
      6/30/13   3/31/13   12/31/12   9/30/12   6/30/12  
                                   
      (Dollars in millions)  
  Noninterest-bearing deposits $  33,586    $  32,518    $  31,849    $  29,990    $  27,643   
  Interest checking    19,276       20,169       19,837       20,157       19,911   
  Money market and savings    48,140       48,431       47,965       47,500       46,557   
  Certificates and other time deposits    28,034       28,934       31,724       30,727       31,205   
  Foreign office deposits - interest-bearing    947       385       387       321       32   
    Total average deposits $  129,983    $  130,437    $  131,762    $  128,695    $  125,348   

 

72

Average deposits for the second quarter of 2013 decreased $454 million, or 1.4% on an annualized basis, compared to the first quarter of 2013. While total average deposits declined during the quarter, the mix of the portfolio has continued to improve as average noninterest-bearing deposits grew $1.1 billion and average certificates and other time deposits decreased $900 million during the quarter. Average noninterest-bearing deposits represented 25.8% of total average deposits for the second quarter of 2013, compared to 24.9% for the prior quarter.

 

Average noninterest-bearing deposits for commercial and retail accounts increased $1.2 billion, and were partially offset by public funds accounts that decreased $180 million. Average interest-checking and money market and savings accounts were down $1.2 billion compared to the prior quarter, which reflects a decrease in public funds and commercial accounts totaling $991 million and $406 million, respectively. These declines were partially offset by an increase of $212 million in retail accounts. Foreign office deposits increased $562 million compared to the first quarter, which partially offset the declines in interest checking, money market and savings, and certificates and other time deposits.

 

The cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.32% for the second quarter of 2013, a decrease of four basis points compared to the prior quarter.

 

Management expects continued growth in noninterest-bearing deposits during the third quarter of 2013, along with lower interest-bearing deposit costs, resulting in the cost of deposits falling below 0.30% by year-end.

 

Borrowings

 

At June 30, 2013, short-term borrowings totaled $3.2 billion, an increase of $328 million, compared to December 31, 2012. Long-term debt totaled $19.4 billion at June 30, 2013, an increase of $248 million, or 1.3%, from the balance at December 31, 2012. The increase in long-term debt reflects the June 2013 issuance of $125 million in floating rate (0.70% at June 30, 2013) senior notes due June 2016, $400 million in floating rate (1.13% at June 30, 2013) senior notes due in June 2018, and $600 million in senior notes with an interest rate of 2.05% due in June 2018. These issuances were partially offset by the maturity of $222 million in 4.875% subordinated notes in January 2013, and a net decrease of $532 million in FHLB advances.

 

Shareholders’ Equity

 

Total shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2013 was $22.0 billion, an increase of $773 million, or 3.6%, compared to December 31, 2012. This increase was driven by net proceeds of $487 million from the issuance of Tier 1 qualifying Series G Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, and net income of $832 million offset by common and preferred dividends totaling $322 million and $43 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a $225 million increase in other comprehensive loss, which primarily reflects a decrease in unrealized net gains on AFS securities totaling $415 million, offset by $162 million decrease in unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges, both of which relate to the increase in certain interest rates during the six months ended June 30, 2013. BB&T’s book value per common share at June 30, 2013 was $27.51, compared to $27.21 at December 31, 2012.

 

Merger-Related and Restructuring Activities

 

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, merger-related and restructuring accruals totaled $30 million and $11 million, respectively. The increase is primarily due to optimization activities related to Community Banking initiated during the second quarter. Merger-related and restructuring accruals are re-evaluated periodically and adjusted as necessary. The remaining accruals at June 30, 2013 are expected to be utilized within one year, unless they relate to specific contracts that expire later.

 

73

Risk Management

 

In the normal course of business BB&T encounters inherent risk in its business activities. Risk decisions are made as closely as possible to where the risk occurs. Centrally, risk oversight is managed at the corporate level through oversight, policies and reporting. The principal types of inherent risk include regulatory, credit, liquidity, market, operational, reputation and strategic risks. Refer to BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for disclosures related to each of these risks under the section titled “Risk Management.”

 

Market Risk Management

 

The effective management of market risk is essential to achieving BB&T’s strategic financial objectives. As a financial institution, BB&T’s most significant market risk exposure is interest rate risk in its balance sheet; however, market risk also includes product liquidity risk, price risk and volatility risk in BB&T’s lines of business. The primary objectives of market risk management are to minimize any adverse effect that changes in market risk factors may have on net interest income, and to offset the risk of price changes for certain assets recorded at fair value. At BB&T, market risk management also includes the enterprise-wide IPV function.

 

Interest Rate Market Risk (Other than Trading)

 

BB&T actively manages market risk associated with asset and liability portfolios with a focus on the strategic pricing of asset and liability accounts and management of appropriate maturity mixes of assets and liabilities. The goal of these activities is the development of appropriate maturity and repricing opportunities in BB&T’s portfolios of assets and liabilities that will produce reasonably consistent net interest income during periods of changing interest rates. These portfolios are analyzed for proper fixed-rate and variable-rate mixes under various interest rate scenarios.

 

The asset/liability management process is designed to achieve relatively stable NIM and assure liquidity by coordinating the volumes, maturities or repricing opportunities of earning assets, deposits and borrowed funds. Among other things, this process gives consideration to prepayment trends related to securities, loans and leases and certain deposits that have no stated maturity. Prepayment assumptions are developed using a combination of market data and internal historical prepayment experience for residential mortgage-related loans and securities, and internal historical prepayment experience for client deposits with no stated maturity and loans that are not residential mortgage related. These assumptions are subject to monthly back-testing, and are adjusted as deemed necessary to reflect changes in interest rates relative to the reference rate of the underlying assets or liabilities. On a monthly basis, BB&T evaluates the accuracy of its interest rate forecast model, which includes an evaluation of its prepayment assumptions, to ensure that all significant assumptions inherent in the model appropriately reflect changes in the interest rate environment and related trends in prepayment activity. It is the responsibility of the MRLCC to determine and achieve the most appropriate volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as to ensure an adequate level of liquidity and capital, within the context of corporate performance goals. The MRLCC also sets policy guidelines and establishes long-term strategies with respect to interest rate risk exposure and liquidity. The MRLCC meets regularly to review BB&T’s interest rate risk and liquidity positions in relation to present and prospective market and business conditions, and adopts funding and balance sheet management strategies that are intended to ensure that the potential impact on earnings and liquidity as a result of fluctuations in interest rates is within acceptable standards.

 

BB&T uses derivatives primarily to manage economic risk related to securities, commercial loans, MSRs, mortgage banking operations, long-term debt and other funding sources. BB&T also uses derivatives to facilitate transactions on behalf of its clients. As of June 30, 2013, BB&T had derivative financial instruments outstanding with notional amounts totaling $64.1 billion, with a net liability fair value of $21 million. See Note 14 “Derivative Financial Instruments” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” herein for additional disclosures.

 

The majority of BB&T’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature and, therefore, differ greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets or inventories. Fluctuations in interest rates and actions of the FRB to regulate the availability and cost of credit have a greater effect on a financial institution’s profitability than do the effects of higher costs for goods and services. Through its balance sheet management function, which is monitored by the MRLCC, management believes that BB&T is positioned to respond to changing needs for liquidity, changes in interest rates and inflationary trends.

 

74

Management uses the Simulation to measure the sensitivity of projected earnings to changes in interest rates. The Simulation model projects net interest income and interest rate risk for a rolling two-year period of time. The Simulation takes into account the current contractual agreements that BB&T has made with its customers on deposits, borrowings, loans, investments and commitments to enter into those transactions. Furthermore, the Simulation considers the impact of expected customer behavior. Management monitors BB&T’s interest sensitivity by means of a model that incorporates the current volumes, average rates earned and paid, and scheduled maturities and payments of asset and liability portfolios, together with multiple scenarios that include projected prepayments, repricing opportunities and anticipated volume growth. Using this information, the model projects earnings based on projected portfolio balances under multiple interest rate scenarios. This level of detail is needed to simulate the effect that changes in interest rates and portfolio balances may have on the earnings of BB&T. This method is subject to the accuracy of the assumptions that underlie the process, but management believes that it provides a better illustration of the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates than other analyses such as static or dynamic gap. In addition to Simulation analysis, BB&T uses EVE analysis to focus on projected changes in capital given potential changes in interest rates. This measure also allows BB&T to analyze interest rate risk that falls outside the analysis window contained in the Simulation model. The EVE model is a discounted cash flow of BB&T’s portfolio of assets, liabilities, and derivative instruments. The difference in the present value of assets minus the present value of liabilities is defined as the economic value of BB&T’s equity.

 

The asset/liability management process requires a number of key assumptions. Management determines the most likely outlook for the economy and interest rates by analyzing external factors, including published economic projections and data, the effects of likely monetary and fiscal policies, as well as any enacted or prospective regulatory changes. BB&T’s current and prospective liquidity position, current balance sheet volumes and projected growth, accessibility of funds for short-term needs and capital maintenance are also considered. This data is combined with various interest rate scenarios to provide management with the information necessary to analyze interest sensitivity and to aid in the development of strategies to reach performance goals.

 

The following table shows the effect that the indicated changes in interest rates would have on net interest income as projected for the next twelve months assuming a gradual change in interest rates as described below. Key assumptions in the preparation of the table include prepayment speeds of mortgage-related and other assets, cash flows and maturities of derivative financial instruments, loan volumes and pricing, deposit sensitivity, customer preferences and capital plans. The resulting change in net interest income reflects the level of sensitivity that interest sensitive income has in relation to changing interest rates.

 

Table 15
Interest Sensitivity Simulation Analysis
                                     
                          Annualized Hypothetical  
        Interest Rate Scenario   Percentage Change in  
        Linear   Prime Rate   Net Interest Income  
        Change in   June 30,   June 30,  
        Prime Rate    2013    2012    2013    2012  
         2.00  %    5.25  %    5.25  %    3.94  %    3.42  %  
         1.00       4.25       4.25       2.47       1.97     
        No Change      3.25       3.25       ―         ―       
         (0.25)      3.00       3.00       (0.11)      (0.24)    

 

The MRLCC has established parameters related to interest sensitivity that prescribe a maximum negative impact on net interest income under different interest rate scenarios. In the event the results of the Simulation model fall outside the established parameters, management will make recommendations to the MRLCC on the most appropriate response given the current economic forecast. The following parameters and interest rate scenarios are considered BB&T’s primary measures of interest rate risk:

 

·Maximum negative impact on net interest income of 2% for the next 12 months assuming a linear change in interest rates totaling 100 basis points over four months followed by a flat interest rate scenario for the remaining eight month period.

 

·Maximum negative impact on net interest income of 4% for the next 12 months assuming a linear change of 200 basis points over eight months followed by a flat interest rate scenario for the remaining four month period.

 

75

These “interest rate ramp” limits are considered BB&T’s primary measure of interest rate risk. If a rate change of 200 basis points cannot be modeled due to a low level of rates, a proportional limit applies. Management currently only models a negative 25 basis point decline because larger declines would have resulted in a Federal funds rate of less than zero. In a situation such as this, the maximum negative impact on net interest income is adjusted on a proportional basis. Regardless of the proportional limit, the negative risk exposure limit will be the greater of 1% or the proportional limit.

 

Management has also established a maximum negative impact on net interest income of 4% for an immediate 100 basis points change in rates and 8% for an immediate 200 basis points change in rates. These “interest rate shock” limits are designed to create an outer band of acceptable risk based upon a significant and immediate change in rates.

 

Management must also consider how the balance sheet and interest rate risk position could be impacted by changes in balance sheet mix. Liquidity in the banking industry has been very strong during the current economic cycle. Much of this liquidity increase has been due to a significant increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. Consistent with the industry, Branch Bank has seen a significant increase in this funding source. The behavior of these deposits is one of the most important assumptions used in determining the interest rate risk position of BB&T. A loss of these deposits in the future would reduce the asset sensitivity of BB&T’s balance sheet as the company increases interest-bearing funds to offset the loss of this advantageous funding source.

 

Beta represents the correlation between overall market interest rates and the rates paid by BB&T on interest-bearing deposits. BB&T applies an average beta of approximately 80% to its managed rate deposits for determining its interest rate sensitivity. Managed rate deposits are high beta, premium money market and interest checking accounts, which attract significant client funds when needed to support balance sheet growth. BB&T regularly conducts sensitivity on other key variables to determine the impact they could have on the interest rate risk position. This discipline informs management judgment and allows BB&T to evaluate the likely impact on its balance sheet management strategies due to a more extreme variation in a key assumption than expected.

 

The following table shows the effect that the loss of demand deposits and an associated increase in managed rate deposits would have on BB&T’s interest-rate sensitivity position. For purposes of this analysis, BB&T modeled the incremental beta for the replacement of the lost demand deposits at 100%.

 

Table 16
Deposit Mix Sensitivity Analysis
                                 
                    Results Assuming a Decrease in  
        Increase in     Base Scenario   Noninterest Bearing Demand Deposits  
        Rates     at June 30, 2013 (1)   $1 Billion   $5 Billion  
         2.00  %      3.94  %    3.68  %    2.67  %  
         1.00         2.47       2.31       1.68     
                                 
                                 
(1) The base scenario is equal to the annualized hypothetical percentage change in net interest income at June 30, 2013 as presented in Table 15.

 

The following table shows the effect that the indicated changes in interest rates would have on EVE. Key assumptions in the preparation of the table include prepayment speeds of mortgage-related and other assets, cash flows and maturities of derivative financial instruments, loan volumes and pricing and deposit sensitivity. The resulting change in the EVE reflects the level of sensitivity that EVE has in relation to changing interest rates.

 

Table 17
EVE Simulation Analysis
                                     
                          Hypothetical Percentage  
              EVE/Assets   Change in EVE  
        Change in    June 30,    June 30,  
        Rates    2013    2012    2013    2012  
         2.00  %    8.4  %    6.7  %    2.1  %    19.3  %  
         1.00       8.4       6.4       2.5       13.3     
        No Change      8.2       5.6       ―         ―       
         (0.25)      8.1       5.4       (1.4)      (4.4)    

 

76

Market Risk from Trading Activities

 

BB&T also manages market risk from trading activities which consists of acting as a financial intermediary to provide its customers access to derivatives, foreign exchange and securities markets. Trading market risk is managed through the use of statistical and non-statistical risk measures and limits. BB&T utilizes a historical VaR methodology to measure and aggregate risks across its covered trading lines of business. This methodology uses one year of historical data to estimate economic outcomes for a one-day time horizon at a 99% confidence level. The average 99% one-day VaR and the maximum daily VaR for the three months ended June 30, 2013 were less than $1 million.

 

Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Related Party Transactions

 

Refer to BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for discussion with respect to BB&T’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about its fixed and determinable contractual obligations. Additional disclosures about BB&T’s contractual obligations, commitments and derivative financial instruments are included in Note 12 “Commitments and Contingencies” and Note 13 “Fair Value Disclosures” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

 

Liquidity

 

Liquidity represents BB&T’s continuing ability to meet funding needs, including deposit withdrawals, timely repayment of borrowings and other liabilities, and funding of loan commitments. In addition to the level of liquid assets, such as cash, cash equivalents and AFS securities, many other factors affect BB&T’s ability to meet liquidity needs, including access to a variety of funding sources, maintaining borrowing capacity in national money markets, growing core deposits, the repayment of loans and the ability to securitize or package loans for sale. BB&T monitors key liquidity metrics at both the Parent Company and Branch Bank.

 

Parent Company

 

The purpose of the Parent Company is to serve as the primary capital financing vehicle for the operating subsidiaries. The assets of the Parent Company consist primarily of cash on deposit with Branch Bank, equity investments in subsidiaries, advances to subsidiaries, accounts receivable from subsidiaries, and other miscellaneous assets. The principal obligations of the Parent Company are principal and interest payments on long-term debt. The main sources of funds for the Parent Company are dividends and management fees from subsidiaries, repayments of advances to subsidiaries, and proceeds from the issuance of equity and long-term debt. The primary uses of funds by the Parent Company are for investments in subsidiaries, advances to subsidiaries, dividend payments to common and preferred shareholders, retirement of common stock and interest and principal payments due on long-term debt.

 

Liquidity at the Parent Company is more susceptible to market disruptions. BB&T prudently manages cash levels at the Parent Company to cover a minimum of one year of projected contractual cash outflows which includes unfunded external commitments, debt service, preferred dividends and scheduled debt maturities without the benefit of any new cash infusions. Generally, BB&T maintains a significant buffer above the projected one year of contractual cash outflows. In determining the buffer, BB&T considers cash for common dividends, unfunded commitments to affiliates, being a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries, and being able to withstand sustained market disruptions which may limit access to the credit markets. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Parent Company had 32 months and 35 months, respectively, of cash on hand to satisfy projected contractual cash outflows as described above.

 

77

Branch Bank

 

Branch Bank has several major sources of funding to meet its liquidity requirements, including access to capital markets through issuance of senior or subordinated bank notes and institutional CDs, access to the FHLB system, dealer repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements with commercial clients, access to the overnight and term Federal funds markets, use of a Cayman branch facility, access to retail brokered CDs and a borrower in custody program with the FRB for the discount window. As of June 30, 2013, BB&T has approximately $55 billion of secured borrowing capacity, which represents approximately 289% of one year wholesale funding maturities.

 

BB&T also monitors the ability to meet customer demand for funds under both normal and stressed market conditions. In considering its liquidity position, management evaluates BB&T’s funding mix based on client core funding, client rate-sensitive funding and non-client rate-sensitive funding. In addition, management also evaluates exposure to rate-sensitive funding sources that mature in one year or less. Management also measures liquidity needs against 30 days of stressed cash outflows for Branch Bank. To ensure a strong liquidity position, management maintains a liquid asset buffer of cash on hand and highly liquid unpledged securities. The Company has established a policy that the liquid asset buffer would be a minimum of 5% of total assets, but intends to maintain the ratio well in excess of this level. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, BB&T’s liquid asset buffer was 10.5% and 11.1%, respectively, of total assets.

 

The ability to raise funding at competitive prices is affected by the rating agencies’ views of the Parent Company’s and Branch Bank’s credit quality, liquidity, capital and earnings. Management meets with the rating agencies on a routine basis to discuss current outlooks.

 

BB&T and Branch Bank have Contingency Funding Plans designed to ensure that liquidity sources are sufficient to meet their ongoing obligations and commitments, particularly in the event of a liquidity contraction. These plans are designed to examine and quantify the organization’s liquidity under various “stress” scenarios. Additionally, the plans provide a framework for management and other critical personnel to follow in the event of a liquidity contraction or in anticipation of such an event. The plans address authority for activation and decision making, liquidity options and the responsibilities of key departments in the event of a liquidity contraction. The liquidity options available to management could include seeking secured funding, asset sales, and under the most extreme scenarios, curtailing new loan originations. Management believes current sources of liquidity are adequate to meet BB&T’s current requirements and plans for continued growth.

 

Capital Adequacy and Resources

 

The maintenance of appropriate levels of capital is a management priority and is monitored on a regular basis. BB&T’s principal goals related to the maintenance of capital are to provide adequate capital to support BB&T’s risk profile consistent with the Board-approved risk appetite, provide financial flexibility to support future growth and client needs, comply with relevant laws, regulations, and supervisory guidance, achieve optimal credit ratings for BB&T and its subsidiaries and provide a competitive return to shareholders.

 

Management regularly monitors the capital position of BB&T on both a consolidated and bank level basis. In this regard, management’s overriding policy is to maintain capital at levels that are in excess of the operating capital guidelines, which are above the regulatory “well capitalized” levels. Management has recently implemented stressed capital ratio minimum guidelines to evaluate whether capital levels are sufficient to withstand the impact of plausible, severe economic downturns or bank-specific events. The following table presents the minimum capital ratios:

 

Table 18
BB&T's Internal Capital Guidelines
    Operating   Stressed  
  Tier 1 Capital Ratio  9.50  %    7.50  %  
  Total Capital Ratio  11.50       9.50     
  Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio  6.50       5.00     
  Tangible Capital Ratio  5.50       4.00     
  Tier 1 Common Equity Ratio  8.00       6.00     

 

78

While nonrecurring events or management decisions may result in the Company temporarily falling below its operating minimum guidelines for one or more of these ratios, it is management’s intent through capital planning to return to these targeted operating minimums within a reasonable period of time. Such temporary decreases below the operating minimums shown above are not considered an infringement of BB&T’s overall capital policy provided the Company and Branch Bank remain “well-capitalized.”

 

On March 14, 2013, the FRB informed BB&T that it objected to certain elements of its capital plan. However, based on the quantitative results of the stress test, BB&T does not believe these objections were related to the Company’s capital strength, earnings power or financial condition. BB&T resubmitted its CCAR plan on June 11, 2013, and the regulators have up to 75 days to review the resubmission and provide the results of their review to the Company.

 

Risk-based capital ratios, which include Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital and Tier 1 Common Equity, are calculated based on regulatory guidance related to the measurement of capital and risk-weighted assets.

 

  Table 19  
  Capital Ratios (1)  
                         
          As of / For the Three Months Ended  
          6/30/13   12/31/12  
                         
          (Dollars in millions, shares in thousands)  
  Risk-based:                
    Tier 1 (2)    11.1  %      10.5  %  
    Total (2)    13.9         13.4     
  Leverage capital    8.8         8.2     
                         
  Non-GAAP capital measures (3)                
    Tier 1 common equity as a percentage of tangible assets    7.3         6.9     
    Tier 1 common equity as a percentage of risk-weighted assets (2)    9.3         9.0     
                         
  Calculations of Tier 1 common equity and tangible assets and related measures:                
    Tier 1 equity $  15,397      $  14,373     
    Less:                
      Qualifying restricted core capital elements    2,603         2,116     
    Tier 1 common equity $  12,794      $  12,257     
                         
    Total assets $  182,735      $  183,872     
    Less:                
      Intangible assets, net of deferred taxes    7,234         7,273     
    Plus:                
      Regulatory adjustments, net of deferred taxes    600         212     
    Tangible assets $  176,101      $  176,811     
                         
  Total risk-weighted assets (4) $  138,265      $  136,367     
  Tier 1 common equity $  12,794      $  12,257     
  Outstanding shares at end of period    702,995         699,728     
  Tangible book value per common share $  18.20      $  17.52     
                         
(1)Regulatory capital information is preliminary.
 (2)Tier 1 capital, total capital and Tier 1 common equity ratios as of December 31, 2012 were previously reported on BB&T’s March 31, 2013 Form 10-Q as 10.7%, 13.6% and 9.1%, respectively.
 (3)Tier 1 common equity ratios are non-GAAP measures. BB&T uses the Tier 1 common equity definition used in the SCAP assessment to calculate these ratios. Management uses these measures to assess the quality of capital and believes that investors may find them useful in their analysis of the Company. These capital measures are not necessarily comparable to similar capital measures that may be presented by other companies.
 (4)Risk-weighted assets as of December 31, 2012 was previously reported on BB&T’s March 31, 2013 Form 10-Q as $134.5 billion.

 

79

 

Table 20
Basel III Capital Ratios (1)
                 
          June 30, 2013  
                 
          (Dollars in millions)  
  Tier 1 common equity under Basel I definition $  12,794   
  Adjustments:        
    OCI related to AFS securities and benefit plans    ―     
    Other adjustments    62   
  Tier 1 common equity under Basel III definition $  12,856   
  Risk-weighted assets under Basel III definition $  144,797   
  Common equity Tier 1 ratio under Basel III    8.9  %
                 
                 
 (1) Regulatory capital information is preliminary. The Basel III amounts are based upon management's preliminary interpretation of the rules adopted by the FRB on July 2, 2013 and are subject to change.

 

BB&T’s common equity Tier 1 ratio under Basel III was approximately 8.9% at June 30, 2013 based on management’s interpretation of the final rules adopted by the FRB on July 2, 2013, which established a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations. The minimum required common equity Tier 1 ratio, including the capital conservation buffer, will gradually increase from 4.5% on January 1, 2015 to 7.0% on January 1, 2019.

 

Share Repurchase Activity

 

No shares were repurchased in connection with the 2006 Repurchase Plan during 2013.

 

Table 21  
Share Repurchase Activity  
                         
                      Maximum Remaining  
                      Number of Shares  
        Total   Average   Total Shares Purchased   Available for Repurchase  
        Shares   Price Paid   Pursuant to   Pursuant to  
        Repurchased (1)   Per Share (2)   Publicly-Announced Plan   Publicly-Announced Plan  
                         
        (Shares in thousands)  
                         
  April 2013  3    $  31.09     ―       44,139   
  May 2013  7       31.34     ―       44,139   
  June 2013  18       33.49     ―       44,139   
    Total  28     32.69     ―       44,139   
                         
(1)Repurchases reflect shares exchanged or surrendered in connection with the exercise of equity-based awards under BB&T’s equity-based compensation plans.
(2)Excludes commissions.

 

Non-GAAP Information

 

Certain amounts have been presented that exclude the effect of the $281 million adjustment to the provision for income taxes that was recognized in the first quarter of 2013. BB&T believes these adjusted measures are meaningful as excluding the adjustment increases the comparability of certain period-to-period results. The following table reconciles these adjusted measures to their corresponding GAAP amount.

 

80

 

Table 22
Non-GAAP Reconciliations
         
      As Reported   Tax Adjustment   Excluding Tax Adjustment  
                           
      (Dollars in millions, except per share amount)  
  Six Months Ended June 30, 2013                        
  Net income available to common shareholders   $  757      $  281    $  1,038     
  Weighted average number of diluted common shares (thousands)      711,998               711,998     
  Diluted EPS   $  1.06            $  1.46     
                           
  Net income   $  832      $  281    $  1,113     
  Average assets      181,597         191       181,788     
  Return on average assets      0.92  %            1.23  %  
                           
  Net income available to common shareholders   $  757      $  281    $  1,038     
  Average common shareholders' equity      19,216         191       19,407     
  Return on average common shareholders' equity      7.95  %            10.79  %  
                           
  Three Months Ended March 31, 2013                        
  Net income   $  256      $  281    $  537     
  Average assets      181,358         100       181,458     
  Return on average assets      0.57  %            1.20  %  
                           
  Net income available to common shareholders   $  210      $  281    $  491     
  Average common shareholders' equity      19,138         100       19,238     
  Return on average common shareholders' equity      4.44  %            10.34  %  

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Refer to “Market Risk Management” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section herein.

 

ITEM  4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the management of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

81

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Refer to the “Commitments and Contingencies” footnote in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in BB&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to BB&T or that management has deemed to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect BB&T’s business, financial condition, and/or operating results.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

(c) Refer to “Share Repurchase Activity” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section herein.

 

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS
       
3(i)   Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended and restated April 25, 2013, and as further amended April 26, 2013.  
       
11    Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share.  
       
12    Statement re: Computation of Ratios.  
       
31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  
       
31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  
       
32    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  
       
101.INS   XBRL Instance Document.  
       
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.  
       
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.  
       
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.  
       
101.PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.  
       
101.DEF   XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase.  

 

82

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

   

BB&T CORPORATION

(Registrant)

       
Date: August 8, 2013   By: /s/ Daryl N. Bible
     

Daryl N. Bible, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

       
Date: August 8, 2013   By: /s/ Cynthia B. Powell
     

Cynthia B. Powell, Executive Vice President and
Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

83

 

EXHIBIT INDEX  
               
Exhibit No.   Description   Location  
               
3(i)†   Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended and restated April 25, 2013, and as further amended April 26, 2013.   Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 2, 2013.  
               
  11   Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share.   Filed herewith as Note 15.  
               
  12†   Statement re: Computation of Ratios.   Filed herewith.  
               
  31.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   Filed herewith.  
               
  31.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   Filed herewith.  
               
  32   Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   Furnished herewith.  
               
101.INS   XBRL Instance Document.   Filed herewith.  
               
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.   Filed herewith.  
               
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.   Filed herewith.  
               
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.   Filed herewith.  
               
101.PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.   Filed herewith.  
               
101.DEF   XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase.   Filed herewith.  
               
               
*   Management compensatory plan or arrangement.  
  Exhibit filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available upon request.  

 

 

84