10-K 1 hpi10k2007_final.htm FORM 10K 2007

 


 

FORM 10-K

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

x

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

 

OR

 

o

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from________ to___________

 

Commission file number 1-13100

 

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Maryland

56-1871668

 

 

(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

 

 

3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600

Raleigh, N.C. 27604

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

919-872-4924

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $.01 par value

New York Stock Exchange

8 5/8% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares

New York Stock Exchange

8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

NONE

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Exchange Act. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. Yes o No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘large accelerated filer,’ ‘accelerated filer’ and ‘smaller reporting company’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). Yes o No x

 

The aggregate market value of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange) on June 30, 2007 was approximately $2.1 billion. As of December 31, 2007, there were 57,167,193 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 15, 2008 are incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 5 and Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Form 10-K.

 


 

 

 

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item No.

 

 

 

Page

 

 

 

PART I

 

 

 

1.

 

Business

 

3

 

1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

6

 

1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

10

 

2.

 

Properties

 

11

 

3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

16

 

4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

16

 

X.

 

Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

 

5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities

 

19

 

6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

21

 

7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations

 

22

 

7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

46

 

8.

 

Financial Statements

 

46

 

9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure

 

46

 

9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

47

 

9B.

 

Other Information

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

 

10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

50

 

11.

 

Executive Compensation

 

50

 

12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters

 

50

 

13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

50

 

14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 

 

15.

 

Exhibits

 

51

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

PART I

 

We refer to (1) Highwoods Properties, Inc. as the “Company,” (2) Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership as the “Operating Partnership,” (3) the Company’s common stock as “Common Stock,” (4) the Company’s preferred stock as “Preferred Stock,” (5) the Operating Partnership’s common partnership interests as “Common Units,” (6) the Operating Partnership’s preferred partnership interests as “Preferred Units” and (7) in-service properties (excluding rental residential units) to which the Company and/or the Operating Partnership have title and 100.0% ownership rights as the “Wholly Owned Properties.”

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

General

 

The Company is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that began operations through a predecessor in 1978. The Company completed its initial public offering in 1994 and its Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “HIW.” We are one of the largest owners and operators of suburban office, industrial and retail properties in the southeastern and midwestern United States. At December 31, 2007, we:

 

 

wholly owned 311 in-service office, industrial and retail properties, encompassing approximately 26.6 million rentable square feet, and 109 rental residential units;

 

 

owned an interest (50.0% or less) in 67 in-service office and industrial properties, encompassing approximately 7.3 million rentable square feet, and 418 rental residential units. Five of these in-service office properties are consolidated at December 31, 2007 as more fully described in Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements;

 

 

wholly owned 634 acres of undeveloped land, approximately 493 acres of which are considered core holdings and which are suitable to develop approximately 7.6 million rentable square feet of office and industrial space; and

 

 

were developing or re-developing 15 wholly owned properties comprising approximately 2.2 million square feet that were under construction or were completed but had not achieved 95% stabilized occupancy and 139 for-sale condominiums (through a consolidated 93% owned joint venture).

 

The Company conducts virtually all of its activities through the Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. At December 31, 2007, the Company owned all of the Preferred Units and 93.3% of the Common Units in the Operating Partnership. Limited partners (including certain officers and directors of the Company) own the remaining Common Units. Each Common Unit is redeemable by the holder for the cash value of one share of Common Stock or, at the Company’s option, one share of Common Stock. Preferred Units in the Operating Partnership were issued to the Company in connection with the Company’s Preferred Stock offerings that occurred in 1997 and 1998.

 

The Company was incorporated in Maryland in 1994. The Operating Partnership was formed in North Carolina in 1994. Our executive offices are located at 3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 and our telephone number is (919) 872-4924. We maintain offices in each of our primary markets.

 

Our business is the acquisition, development and operation of rental real estate properties. We operate office, industrial, retail and residential properties. There are no material inter-segment transactions. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of the rental income, net operating income and assets for each reportable segment.

 

In addition to this Annual Report, we file or furnish quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). All documents that we file or furnish with the SEC are made available as soon as reasonably practicable free of charge on our corporate website, which is http://www.highwoods.com. The information on this website is not and should not be considered part of this Annual Report and is not incorporated by reference in this document. This website is only intended to be an inactive textual reference. You may also read and copy any document that we file or furnish at the public reference facilities of the

 

3

 

 

SEC at 100 F. Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at (800) 732-0330 for further information about the public reference facilities. These documents also may be accessed through the SEC’s electronic data gathering, analysis and retrieval system (“EDGAR”) via electronic means, including the SEC’s home page on the Internet (http://www.sec.gov). In addition, since some of our securities are listed on the NYSE, you can read similar information about us at the offices of the NYSE at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

 

During 2007, we filed unqualified Section 303A certifications with the NYSE. We have also filed the CEO and CFO certifications required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as exhibits to our 2007 Annual Report.

 

Customers

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the 20 largest customers of our Wholly Owned Properties as of December 31, 2007:

 

Customer

 

Rental
Square Feet

 

Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue (1)

 

Percent
of Total
Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue (1)

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Lease Term
in Years

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Federal Government

 

1,746,749

 

$

31,626

 

7.62

%

8.3

 

AT&T

 

656,905

 

 

12,936

 

3.12

 

2.8

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

358,611

 

 

9,781

 

2.36

 

2.3

 

State of Georgia

 

367,986

 

 

7,664

 

1.85

 

2.5

 

T-Mobile USA

 

207,517

 

 

5,680

 

1.37

 

5.9

 

Metropolitan Life Insurance

 

262,586

 

 

5,022

 

1.21

 

10.0

 

Lockton Companies

 

156,255

 

 

4,090

 

0.99

 

7.2

 

Volvo

 

278,940

 

 

3,947

 

0.95

 

4.0

 

Syniverse Technologies, Inc.

 

198,750

 

 

3,931

 

0.95

 

8.8

 

BB&T

 

238,595

 

 

3,768

 

0.91

 

5.0

 

Northern Telecom

 

246,000

 

 

3,651

 

0.88

 

0.2

 

Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

 

205,036

 

 

3,625

 

0.87

 

4.1

 

SCI Services (2)

 

162,784

 

 

3,605

 

0.87

 

9.6

 

US Airways

 

182,775

 

 

3,139

 

0.76

 

3.7

 

Jacob’s Engineering Group, Inc.

 

181,794

 

 

2,918

 

0.70

 

7.7

 

Vanderbilt University

 

144,161

 

 

2,825

 

0.68

 

7.8

 

Lifepoint Corporate Services

 

129,217

 

 

2,549

 

0.61

 

3.5

 

Talecris Biotherapeutics

 

132,624

 

 

2,531

 

0.61

 

4.2

 

Icon Clinical Research

 

110,909

 

 

2,422

 

0.58

 

5.6

 

Wachovia

 

107,487

 

 

2,405

 

0.58

 

2.5

 

Total (3)

 

6,075,681

 

$

118,115

 

28.47

%

5.6

 

                              

(1)

Annualized Cash Rental Revenue is cash rental revenue (base rent plus additional rent based on the level of operating expenses, excluding straight-line rent) for the month of December 2007 multiplied by 12.

(2)

Morgan Stanley acquired SCI Services (previously known as Saxon Capital, Inc.) on December 4, 2006.

(3)

Excludes customers that may lease space in joint venture properties that are consolidated but are not Wholly Owned Properties.

 

4

 

 

Operating Strategy

 

Efficient, Customer Service-Oriented Organization. We provide a complete line of real estate services to our customers and third parties. We believe that our in-house development, acquisition, construction management, leasing and property management services allow us to respond to the many demands of our existing and potential customer base. We provide our customers with cost-effective services such as build-to-suit construction and space modification, including tenant improvements and expansions. In addition, the breadth of our capabilities and resources provides us with market information not generally available. We believe that the operating efficiencies achieved through our fully integrated organization also provide a competitive advantage in setting our lease rates and pricing other services.

 

Capital Recycling Program. Our strategy has been to focus our real estate activities in markets where we believe our extensive local knowledge gives us a competitive advantage over other real estate developers and operators. Through our capital recycling program, we generally seek to:

 

 

selectively dispose of non-core properties in order to use the net proceeds to improve our balance sheet by reducing outstanding debt and Preferred Stock balances, to make new investments or for other purposes;

 

 

engage in the development of office, industrial and other real estate projects in existing or new geographic markets, primarily in suburban in-fill business parks; and

 

 

acquire selective suburban office and industrial properties in existing or new geographic markets at prices below replacement cost that offer attractive returns.

 

Our capital recycling activities benefit from our local market presence and knowledge. Because our division officers and staff have significant real estate experience in their respective markets, we believe that we are in a better position to evaluate capital recycling opportunities than many of our competitors. In addition, our relationships with our customers and those tenants at properties for which we conduct third-party fee-based services may lead to development projects when these tenants seek new space.

 

The following table summarizes the changes in square footage in our in-service Wholly Owned Properties during the past three years:

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(rentable square feet in thousands)

 

Office, Industrial and Retail Properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dispositions

 

(1,172

)

(2,982

)

(4,641

)

Developments Placed In-Service (1)

 

930

 

33

 

713

 

Redevelopment/Other

 

3

 

(74

)

(133

)

Acquisitions

 

 

70

 

 

Net Change of In-Service Wholly Owned Properties

 

(239

)

(2,953

)

(4,061

)

                                

(1)

We consider a development project to be stabilized upon the earlier of the original projected stabilization date or the date such project is at least 95% occupied.

 

Conservative and Flexible Balance Sheet. We are committed to maintaining a conservative and flexible balance sheet that allows us to capitalize on favorable development and acquisition opportunities as they arise. We expect to meet our short- and long-term liquidity requirements through a combination of any one or more of:

 

 

cash flow from operating activities;

 

 

borrowings under our credit facilities;

 

 

the issuance of unsecured debt;

 

 

5

 

 

 

the issuance of secured debt;

 

 

the issuance of equity securities or partnership interests by the Company and the Operating Partnership, respectively;

 

 

the selective disposition of non-core land and other assets; and

 

 

private equity capital raised from unrelated joint venture partners involving the sale or contribution of our Wholly Owned Properties, development projects or development land.

 

Geographic Diversification. We do not believe that our operations are significantly dependent upon any particular geographic market. Today, including our various joint ventures, our portfolio consists primarily of office and industrial properties throughout the Southeast, retail and office properties in Kansas City, Missouri, including one significant mixed retail and office property, and office properties in Des Moines, Iowa.

 

Competition

 

Our properties compete for tenants with similar properties located in our markets primarily on the basis of location, rent, services provided and the design and condition of the facilities. We also compete with other REITs, financial institutions, pension funds, partnerships, individual investors and others when attempting to acquire, develop and operate properties.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2007, we had 461 employees.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our securities involves various risks. All investors should carefully consider the following risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained in this Annual Report before trading in our securities. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, operating results, prospects and financial condition could be harmed.

 

Our performance is subject to risks associated with real estate investment. We are a real estate company that derives most of our income from the ownership and operation of our properties. There are a number of factors that may adversely affect the income that our properties generate, including the following:

 

 

Economic Downturns. Downturns in the national economy, particularly in the Southeast, generally will negatively impact the demand and rental rates for our properties.

 

 

Oversupply of Space. An oversupply of space in our markets would typically cause rental rates and occupancies to decline, making it more difficult for us to lease space at attractive rental rates.

 

 

Competitive Properties. If our properties are not as attractive to tenants (in terms of rent, services, condition or location) as properties owned by our competitors, we could lose tenants to those properties or receive lower rental rates.

 

 

Renovation Costs. In order to maintain the quality of our properties and successfully compete against other properties, we periodically must spend money to maintain, repair and renovate our properties.

 

 

Customer Risk. Our performance depends on our ability to collect rent from our customers. Our financial condition could be adversely affected by financial difficulties experienced by a major customer, or by a number of smaller customers, including bankruptcies, insolvencies or general downturns in business.

 

 

Reletting Costs. As leases expire, we try to either relet the space to the existing customer or attract a new customer to occupy the space. In either case, we may incur significant costs in the process, including potentially substantial tenant improvement expense or lease incentives. In addition, if market rents have declined since the time the expiring lease was executed, the terms of any new lease likely will not be as

 

6

 

 

favorable to us as the terms of the expiring lease, thereby reducing the rental revenue earned from that space.

 

 

Regulatory Costs. There are a number of government regulations, including zoning, tax and accessibility laws, that apply to the ownership and operation of our properties. Compliance with existing and newly adopted regulations may require us to incur significant costs on our properties.

 

 

Rising Operating Costs. Costs of operating our properties, such as real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, maintenance and other costs, can rise faster than our ability to increase rental income. While we do receive some additional rent from our tenants that is based on recovering a portion of operating expenses, generally increased operating expenses will negatively impact our net operating income. Our revenues and expense recoveries are subject to longer term leases and may not be quickly increased sufficient to recover an increase in operating costs and expenses.

 

 

Fixed Nature of Costs. Most of the costs associated with owning and operating a property are not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as market factors and competition cause a reduction in rental revenues from the property. Increases in such fixed operating expenses, such as increased real estate taxes or insurance costs, would reduce our net income.

 

 

Environmental Problems. Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real property to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at the property. The clean up can be costly. The presence of or failure to clean up contamination may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease a property or to borrow funds using a property as collateral.

 

 

Competition. A number of other major real estate investors with significant capital compete with us. These competitors include publicly-traded REITs, private REITs, private real estate investors and private institutional investment funds.

 

Future acquisitions and development properties may fail to perform in accordance with our expectations and may require renovation and development costs exceeding our estimates. In the normal course of business, we typically evaluate potential acquisitions, enter into non-binding letters of intent, and may, at any time, enter into contracts to acquire additional properties. Our acquisition investments may fail to perform in accordance with our expectations due to lease up risk, renovation cost risks and other factors. In addition, the renovation and improvement costs we incur in bringing an acquired property up to market standards may exceed our estimates. We may not have the financial resources to make suitable acquisitions or renovations on favorable terms or at all.

 

In addition to acquisitions, we periodically consider developing and constructing properties. Risks associated with development and construction activities include:

 

 

the unavailability of favorable financing;

 

 

construction costs exceeding original estimates;

 

 

construction and lease-up delays resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs; and

 

 

lower than anticipated occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property causing a property to be unprofitable or less profitable than originally estimated.

 

If new developments are financed through construction loans, there is a risk that, upon completion of construction, permanent financing for newly developed properties will not be available or will be available only on disadvantageous terms. Development activities are also subject to risks relating to our ability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental and utility company authorizations.

 

Illiquidity of real estate investments and the tax effect of dispositions could significantly impede our ability to sell assets or to respond to favorable or adverse changes in the performance of our properties. Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in our

 

7

 

 

portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions is limited. In addition, we have a significant amount of mortgage debt under which we could incur significant prepayment penalties if such loans were paid off in connection with the sale of the underlying real estate assets. Such loans, even if assumed by a buyer rather than being paid off, could reduce the sale proceeds we receive if we sold such assets.

 

We intend to continue to sell some of our properties in the future. However, we cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether the price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.

 

Certain of our properties have low tax bases relative to their estimated current fair values, and accordingly, the sale of such assets would generate significant taxable gains unless we sold such properties in a tax-free exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code or another tax-free or tax-deferred transaction. For an exchange to qualify for tax-deferred treatment under Section 1031, the net proceeds from the sale of a property must be held by an escrow agent until applied toward the purchase of real estate qualifying for gain deferral. Given the competition for properties meeting our investment criteria, there could be a delay in reinvesting such proceeds. Any delay in using the reinvestment proceeds to acquire additional income producing assets would reduce our income from operations.

 

In addition, the sale of certain properties acquired in the J.C. Nichols Company merger in July 1998, including assets acquired in connection with Section 1031 exchanges with properties originally acquired in the J.C. Nichols Company merger, would require us to pay corporate-level tax under Section 1374 of the Internal Revenue Code on the built-in gain relating to such properties unless we sold such properties in a tax-free exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code or another tax-free or tax-deferred transaction. This tax will no longer apply after July 2008 because we will have owned the assets for 10 years or more. As a result, we may choose not to sell these properties even if management determines that such a sale would otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. We have no current plans to dispose of any properties in a manner that would require us to pay corporate-level tax under Section 1374. However, we would consider doing so if our management determines that a sale of a property would be in our best interests based on consideration of a number of factors, including the price being offered for the property, the operating performance of the property, the tax consequences of the sale and other factors and circumstances surrounding the proposed sale.

 

Because holders of our Common Units, including some of our officers and directors, may suffer adverse tax consequences upon the sale of some of our properties, it is possible that we may sometimes make decisions that are not in your best interest. Holders of Common Units may suffer adverse tax consequences upon our sale of certain properties. Therefore, holders of Common Units, including certain of our officers and directors, may have different objectives than our stockholders regarding the appropriate pricing and timing of a property’s sale. Although we are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and have the exclusive authority to sell all of our individual Wholly Owned Properties, officers and directors who hold Common Units may seek to influence us not to sell certain properties even if such sale might be financially advantageous to stockholders or influence us to enter into tax deferred exchanges with the proceeds of such sales when such a reinvestment might not otherwise be financially advantageous to stockholders.

 

The success of our joint venture activity depends upon our ability to work effectively with financially sound partners. Instead of owning properties directly, we have in some cases invested, and may continue to invest, as a partner or a co-venturer with one or more third parties. Under certain circumstances, this type of investment may involve risks not otherwise present, including the possibility that a partner or co-venturer might become bankrupt or that a partner or co-venturer might have business interests or goals inconsistent with ours. Also, such a partner or co-venturer may take action contrary to our requests or contrary to provisions in our joint venture agreements that could harm us.

 

In addition, some of our joint ventures are managed on a day to day basis by our partners, and we have only limited influence on their operating decisions. The success of our investments in those joint ventures is heavily dependent on the operating and financial expertise of our partners.

 

If we want to sell our interests in any of our joint ventures or believe that the properties in the joint venture should be sold, we may not be able to do so in a timely manner or at all, and our partner(s) may not cooperate with our desires, which could harm us.

 

8

 

 

 

Our insurance coverage on our properties may be inadequate. We carry comprehensive insurance on all of our properties, including insurance for liability, fire, windstorms, flood, earthquakes and business interruption. Insurance companies, however, limit coverage against certain types of losses, such as losses due to terrorist acts, named windstorms, earthquakes and toxic mold. Thus, we may not have insurance coverage, or sufficient insurance coverage, against certain types of losses and/or there may be decreases in the insurance coverage available. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property or properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property or properties. If any of our properties were to experience a catastrophic loss, it could disrupt our operations, delay revenue and result in large expenses to repair or rebuild the property. Such events could adversely affect our financial condition. Our existing property, casualty and liability insurance policies are scheduled to expire on June 30, 2008.

 

Our use of debt to finance our operations could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and ability to make distributions. We are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, such as the sufficiency of cash flow to meet required payment obligations, ability to comply with financial ratios and other covenants and the availability of capital to refinance existing indebtedness or fund important business initiatives. Increases in interest rates on our variable rate debt would increase our interest expense. If we fail to comply with the financial ratios and other covenants under our credit facilities, we would likely not be able to borrow any further amounts under such facilities, which could adversely affect our ability to fund our operations, and our lenders could accelerate outstanding debt.

 

We generally do not intend to reserve funds to retire existing secured or unsecured debt upon maturity. We may not be able to repay, refinance or extend any or all of our debt at maturity or upon any acceleration. If any refinancing is done at higher interest rates, the increased interest expense could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to pay dividends to stockholders. Any such refinancing could also impose tighter financial ratios and other covenants that restrict our ability to take actions that could otherwise be in our stockholders’ best interest, such as funding new development activity, making opportunistic acquisitions, repurchasing our securities or paying dividends. If we do not meet our mortgage financing obligations, any properties securing such indebtedness could be foreclosed on, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and ability to pay dividends.

 

We may be subject to taxation as a regular corporation if we fail to maintain our REIT status. Our failure to qualify as a REIT for income tax purposes would have serious adverse consequences to our stockholders. Many of the requirements for taxation as a REIT are highly technical and complex and depend upon various factual matters and circumstances that may not be entirely within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95.0% of our gross income must come from certain sources that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. We are also required to pay dividends to stockholders equal to at least 90.0% of our annual REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains. The fact that we hold virtually all of our assets through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, Congress and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) might change the tax laws and regulations and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates. Also, unless the IRS granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify. If we failed to qualify as a REIT, we would have to pay significant income taxes and would, therefore, have less cash available for investments or to pay dividends to stockholders. This would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities. In addition, if we lost our REIT status, we would no longer be required to pay dividends to stockholders.

 

Because provisions contained in Maryland law, our charter and our bylaws may have an anti-takeover effect, investors may be prevented from receiving a “control premium” for their shares. Provisions contained in our charter and bylaws as well as Maryland general corporation law may have anti-takeover effects that delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt, and thereby prevent stockholders from receiving a “control premium” for their shares. For example, these provisions may defer or prevent tender offers for our Common Stock or purchases of large blocks of our Common Stock, thus limiting the opportunities for our stockholders to receive a premium for their Common Stock over then-prevailing market prices. These provisions include the following:

 

 

Ownership limit. Our charter prohibits direct, indirect or constructive ownership by any person or entity of more than 9.8% of our outstanding capital stock. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our capital stock in excess of the ownership limit without the consent of our Board of Directors will be void.

 

9

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock. Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to issue Preferred Stock in one or more classes and to establish the preferences and rights of any class of Preferred Stock issued. These actions can be taken without stockholder approval. The issuance of Preferred Stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of us, even if a change in control were in our stockholders’ best interest.

 

 

Staggered board. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes. As a result, each director generally serves for a three-year term. This staggering of our Board may discourage offers for us or make an acquisition of us more difficult, even when an acquisition is in the best interest of our stockholders.

 

 

Maryland control share acquisition statute. Maryland’s control share acquisition statute applies to us, which means that persons, entities or related groups that acquire more than 20% of our Common Stock may not be able to vote such excess shares under certain circumstances if such shares were acquired in one or more transactions not approved by at least two-thirds of our outstanding Common Stock held by disinterested stockholders.

 

 

Maryland unsolicited takeover statute. Under Maryland law, our Board of Directors could adopt various anti-takeover provisions without the consent of stockholders. The adoption of such measures could discourage offers for us or make an acquisition of us more difficult, even when an acquisition is in the best interest of our stockholders.

 

 

Anti-takeover protections of Operating Partnership agreement. Upon a change in control of the Company, the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership requires certain acquirers to maintain an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust (“UPREIT”) structure with terms at least as favorable to the limited partners as are currently in place. For instance, the acquirer would be required to preserve the limited partner’s right to continue to hold tax-deferred partnership interests that are redeemable for capital stock of the acquirer. Exceptions would require the approval of two-thirds of the limited partners of the Operating Partnership (other than the Company). These provisions may make a change of control transaction involving the Company more complicated and therefore might decrease the likelihood of such a transaction occurring, even if such a transaction would be in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

10

 

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

Wholly Owned Properties

 

As of December 31, 2007, we owned all of the ownership interests in 311 in-service office, industrial and retail properties, encompassing approximately 26.6 million rentable square feet, and 109 rental residential units. The following table sets forth information about our Wholly Owned Properties (including properties classified as held for sale) and our development properties as of December 31, 2007 and 2006:

 

 

 

December 31, 2007

 

December 31, 2006

 

 

 

Rentable
Square Feet

 

Percent
Leased/
Pre-Leased

 

Rentable
Square Feet

 

Percent
Leased/
Pre-Leased

 

In-Service:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office (1)

 

19,260,000

 

91.1

%

19,244,000

 

89.0

%

Industrial

 

6,036,000

 

94.2

 

6,281,000

 

91.7

 

Retail (2)

 

1,317,000

 

94.9

 

1,327,000

 

95.7

 

Total or Weighted Average

 

26,613,000

(3)

92.0

%

26,852,000

(3)

90.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Completed—Not Stabilized (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office (1)

 

607,000

 

75.9

%

504,000

 

62.8

%

Industrial

 

681,000

 

78.2

 

418,000

 

44.0

 

Total or Weighted Average

 

1,288,000

 

77.1

%

922,000

 

54.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Process (7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office (1)

 

887,000

 

59.9

%

1,357,000

 

55.3

%

Industrial

 

 

 

383,000

 

 

Retail

 

30,000

 

100.0

 

 

 

For Sale Residential (5)

 

139 units

 

 

 

 

Total or Weighted Average

 

917,000

 

61.2

%

1,740,000

 

43.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office (1)

 

20,754,000

 

 

 

21,105,000

 

 

 

Industrial

 

6,717,000

 

 

 

7,082,000

 

 

 

Retail (2)

 

1,347,000

 

 

 

1,327,000

 

 

 

Total or Weighted Average (3), (5), (6)

 

28,818,000

 

 

 

29,514,000

 

 

 

                                

(1)

Substantially all of our office properties are located in suburban markets.

(2)

Excludes 428,000 square feet of basement space in the Country Club Plaza and other Kansas City retail properties.

(3)

Rentable square feet excludes the 109 residential units.

(4)

We consider a development project to be stabilized upon the earlier of the original projected stabilization date or the date such project is at least 95% occupied.

(5)

In January 2007, we executed a joint venture agreement for this development. We now have a 93% interest and we consolidate this joint venture. Because of the 93% ownership level, we include this consolidated residential development in the above table of Wholly Owned Properties. As of December 31, 2007, binding sale contracts had been executed for all 139 residential condominiums. $3.9 million of deposits related to these contracts, which are non-refundable unless we default in our obligation to deliver the units, had been received. These residential units are not part of the In-Process total or weighted average for square feet and pre-leasing percentage.

(6)

Excludes 618,000 square feet of office properties from the following joint venture properties that are consolidated but are not Wholly Owned Properties: (1) one office property that was sold to SF-HIW Harborview Plaza, LP, a 20% owned joint venture, but which is accounted for as a financing under SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate (“SFAS No. 66”), and thus remains consolidated as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and (2) four office properties owned by Highwoods-Markel Associates, LLC, a 50% owned joint venture, which is consolidated beginning January 1, 2006, as described in Notes 1 and 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

11

 

 

(7)

We consider development properties held by the 93% owned consolidated joint venture with Real Estate Exchange Services (“REES”), as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to be Wholly Owned Properties because it is probable that we will exercise our purchase option in the future and own 100% of the properties.

 

The following table sets forth geographic and other information about our in service Wholly Owned Properties at December 31, 2007:

 

 

 

Rentable
Square Feet

 

Occupancy

 

Percentage of Annualized Cash Rental Revenue (1)

 

Market

 

 

 

Office

 

Industrial

 

Retail

 

Total

 

 

Raleigh, NC (2)

 

3,554,000

 

91.5

%

15.4

%

 

 

15.4

%

 

Atlanta, GA

 

5,289,000

 

93.0

 

9.7

 

3.8

%

 

13.5

 

 

Kansas City, MO (3)

 

2,215,000

 

89.4

 

4.4

 

 

9.5

%

13.9

 

 

Tampa, FL

 

2,418,000

 

95.0

 

13.5

 

 

 

13.5

 

 

Nashville, TN

 

3,184,000

 

95.1

 

13.3

 

 

 

13.3

 

 

Piedmont Triad, NC (4)

 

5,328,000

 

89.3

 

6.8

 

3.9

 

 

10.7

 

 

Richmond, VA

 

2,134,000

 

92.5

 

8.9

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

Memphis, TN

 

1,276,000

 

94.9

 

5.8

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

Greenville, SC

 

897,000

 

85.6

 

3.3

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

Orlando, FL

 

218,000

 

100.0

 

1.3

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

Other

 

100,000

 

69.6

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

Total (5)

 

26,613,000

 

92.0

%

82.8

%

7.7

%

9.5

%

100.0

%

 

                              

(1)

Annualized Cash Rental Revenue is cash rental revenue (base rent plus additional rent based on the level of operating expenses, excluding straight-line rent) for the month of December 2007 multiplied by 12.

(2)

The Raleigh market encompasses the Raleigh, Durham, Cary and Research Triangle metropolitan area.

(3)

Excludes 428,000 square feet of basement space in the Country Club Plaza and other Kansas City retail properties.

(4)

The Piedmont Triad market encompasses the Greensboro and Winston-Salem metropolitan area.

(5)

Excludes 618,000 square feet of office properties from the following joint venture properties that are consolidated but are not Wholly Owned Properties: (1) one office property that was sold to SF-HIW Harborview Plaza, LP, a 20% owned joint venture, but which is accounted for as a financing under SFAS No. 66 and thus remains consolidated as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and (2) four office properties owned by Highwoods-Markel Associates, LLC, a 50% owned joint venture, which is consolidated beginning January 1, 2006, as described in Notes 1 and 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Development Land

 

We wholly owned 634 acres of development land as of December 31, 2007. We estimate that we can develop approximately 7.6 million square feet of office and industrial space on the approximately 493 acres that we consider core long term holdings for our future development needs. Our development land is zoned and available for office and industrial development, and nearly all of the land has utility infrastructure in place. We believe that our commercially zoned and unencumbered land in existing business parks gives us a development advantage over other commercial real estate development companies in many of our markets. Any future development, however, is dependent on the demand for office and industrial space in the area, the availability of favorable financing and other factors, and no assurance can be given that any construction will take place on the development land. In addition, if construction is undertaken on the development land, we will be subject to the risks associated with construction activities, including the risks that occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not be sufficient to make the property profitable, construction costs may exceed original estimates and construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction expense. We may also develop properties other than office and industrial on certain parcels with unrelated joint venture partners. We consider approximately 141 acres of our development land at December 31, 2007 to be non-core assets because this land is not necessary for our foreseeable future development needs. We are actively working to dispose of such non-core development land through sales to other parties or contributions to joint ventures. Approximately 40 acres with a net book value of $10.5 million are under contract to be sold and are included in “Real estate and other assets, net, held for sale” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2007.

 

12

 

 

Other Properties

 

As of December 31, 2007, we owned an interest (50.0% or less) in 67 in-service properties. These properties include primarily office and industrial buildings encompassing approximately 7.3 million rentable square feet and 418 rental residential units. The following table sets forth information about the stabilized in-service joint venture properties by segment and by geographic location at December 31, 2007:

 

 

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy

 

Percentage of Annualized Cash Rental Revenue (1)

 

Market

 

 

 

Office

 

Industrial

 

Retail

 

Multi-
Family

 

Total

 

Des Moines, IA

 

2,505,000

(2)

92.3

% (3)

28.7

%

4.3

%

1.0

%

3.3

%

37.3

%

Orlando, FL

 

1,853,000

 

91.2

 

29.1

 

 

 

 

29.1

 

Atlanta, GA

 

835,000

 

97.2

 

12.1

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

Kansas City, MO

 

714,000

 

83.0

 

8.2

 

 

 

 

8.2

 

Richmond, VA (4)

 

413,000

 

100.0

 

5.0

 

 

 

 

5.0

 

Piedmont Triad, NC (5)

 

364,000

 

96.9

 

3.4

 

 

 

 

3.4

 

Tampa, FL (6)

 

205,000

 

98.8

 

2.0

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

Raleigh, NC (7)

 

178,000

 

100.0

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

Charlotte, NC

 

148,000

 

100.0

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

Other

 

110,000

 

100.0

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

Total

 

7,325,000

 

93.0

%

91.4

%

4.3

%

1.0

%

3.3

%

100.0

%

                                

(1)

Annualized Cash Rental Revenue is cash rental revenue (base rent plus additional rent based on the level of operating expenses, excluding straight-line rent) for the month of December 2007 multiplied by 12.

(2)

Excludes 418 residential units.

(3)

Excludes residential occupancy percentage of 95.1%.

(4)

We own a 50.0% interest in this joint venture (Highwoods-Markel Associates, LLC) which is consolidated (see Notes 1 and 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(5)

The Piedmont Triad market encompasses the Greensboro and Winston-Salem metropolitan area.

(6)

We own a 20.0% interest in this joint venture (SF-HIW Harborview Plaza, LP) which is consolidated (see Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(7)

The Raleigh market encompasses the Raleigh, Durham, Cary and Research Triangle metropolitan area.

 

Lease Expirations

 

The following tables set forth scheduled lease expirations for existing leases at our in-service and completed – not stabilized Wholly Owned Properties (excluding residential units) as of December 31, 2007. The tables include (1) expirations of leases in properties that are completed but not yet stabilized and (2) the effects of any early renewals exercised by tenants as of December 31, 2007.

 

13

 

 

 

Office Properties (1):

 

Lease Expiring

 

Rentable
Square Feet
Subject to
Expiring
Leases

 

Percentage
of Leased
Square
Footage
Represented
by Expiring
Leases

 

Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue
Under
Expiring
Leases (2)

 

Average
Annual
Rental Rate
Per Square
Foot for
Expirations

 

Percent of
Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue
Represented
by Expiring
Leases (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

 

2008 (3)

 

1,880,418

 

10.6

%

$

36,172

 

$

19.24

 

10.6

%

2009

 

2,286,375

 

12.9

 

 

45,364

 

 

19.84

 

13.3

 

2010

 

2,459,056

 

13.8

 

 

51,751

 

 

21.05

 

15.3

 

2011

 

2,623,730

 

14.7

 

 

50,524

 

 

19.26

 

14.8

 

2012

 

2,284,521

 

12.8

 

 

46,373

 

 

20.30

 

13.6

 

2013

 

1,316,694

 

7.4

 

 

24,703

 

 

18.76

 

7.3

 

2014

 

1,320,510

 

7.4

 

 

22,129

 

 

16.76

 

6.5

 

2015

 

962,435

 

5.4

 

 

19,303

 

 

20.06

 

5.7

 

2016

 

740,354

 

4.2

 

 

13,734

 

 

18.55

 

4.0

 

2017

 

934,673

 

5.3

 

 

17,957

 

 

19.21

 

5.3

 

Thereafter

 

979,698

 

5.5

 

 

12,380

 

 

12.64

 

3.6

 

 

 

17,788,464

 

100.0

%

$

340,390

 

$

19.14

 

100.0

%

 

Industrial Properties:

 

Lease Expiring

 

Rentable
Square Feet
Subject to
Expiring
Leases

 

Percentage
of Leased
Square
Footage
Represented
by Expiring
Leases

 

Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue
Under
Expiring
Leases (2)

 

Average
Annual
Rental Rate
Per Square
Foot for
Expirations

 

Percent of
Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue
Represented
by Expiring
Leases (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

 

2008 (4)

 

632,195

 

10.2

%

$

3,463

 

$

5.48

 

11.0

%

2009

 

1,114,535

 

17.8

 

 

5,883

 

 

5.28

 

18.7

 

2010

 

834,512

 

13.4

 

 

4,376

 

 

5.24

 

13.9

 

2011

 

1,061,883

 

17.1

 

 

5,285

 

 

4.98

 

16.7

 

2012

 

427,636

 

6.9

 

 

2,462

 

 

5.76

 

7.8

 

2013

 

442,636

 

7.1

 

 

2,480

 

 

5.60

 

7.9

 

2014

 

414,465

 

6.7

 

 

1,786

 

 

4.31

 

5.7

 

2015

 

271,382

 

4.4

 

 

983

 

 

3.62

 

3.1

 

2016

 

264,597

 

4.3

 

 

991

 

 

3.75

 

3.1

 

2017

 

149,600

 

2.4

 

 

722

 

 

4.83

 

2.3

 

Thereafter

 

604,640

 

9.7

 

 

3,103

 

 

5.13

 

9.8

 

 

 

6,218,081

 

100.0

%

$

31,534

 

$

5.07

 

100.0

%

                              

(1)

Excludes the following joint venture properties that are consolidated but are not Wholly Owned Properties: (1) one office property that was sold to SF-HIW Harborview Plaza, LP, a 20% owned joint venture, but which is accounted for as a financing under SFAS No. 66 and thus remains consolidated as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and (2) four office properties owned by Highwoods-Markel Associates, LLC, a 50% owned joint venture, which is consolidated beginning January 1, 2006, as described in Notes 1 and 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)

Annualized Cash Rental Revenue is cash rental revenue (base rent plus additional rent based on the level of operating expenses, excluding straight-line rent) for the month of December 2007 multiplied by 12.

(3)

Includes 53,000 square feet of leases that are on a month-to-month basis, which represent 0.3% of total annualized cash rental revenue.

(4)

Includes 61,000 square feet of leases that are on a month-to-month basis, which represent less than 0.1% of total annualized cash rental revenue.

 

14

 

 

Retail Properties:

 

Lease Expiring

 

Rentable
Square Feet
Subject to
Expiring
Leases

 

Percentage
of Leased
Square
Footage
Represented
by Expiring
Leases

 

Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue
Under
Expiring
Leases (1)

 

Average
Annual
Rental Rate
Per Square
Foot for
Expirations

 

Percent of
Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue
Represented
by Expiring
Leases (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

 

2008 (2)

 

108,599

 

8.7

%

$

2,693

 

$

24.80

 

6.9

%

2009

 

130,487

 

10.4

 

 

4,113

 

 

31.52

 

10.5

 

2010

 

96,255

 

7.7

 

 

3,765

 

 

39.11

 

9.6

 

2011

 

58,702

 

4.7

 

 

1,895

 

 

32.28

 

4.9

 

2012

 

165,979

 

13.3

 

 

5,042

 

 

30.38

 

12.9

 

2013

 

69,296

 

5.5

 

 

2,601

 

 

37.53

 

6.7

 

2014

 

97,976

 

7.8

 

 

2,218

 

 

22.64

 

5.7

 

2015

 

147,338

 

11.8

 

 

4,556

 

 

30.92

 

11.7

 

2016

 

65,526

 

5.2

 

 

2,639

 

 

40.27

 

6.8

 

2017

 

110,420

 

8.8

 

 

2,782

 

 

25.19

 

7.1

 

Thereafter

 

200,336

 

16.1

 

 

6,730

 

 

33.59

 

17.2

 

 

 

1,250,914

 

100.0

%

$

39,034

 

$

31.20

 

100.0

%

 

Total (3):

 

Lease Expiring

 

Rentable
Square Feet
Subject to
Expiring
Leases

 

Percentage
of Leased
Square
Footage
Represented
by Expiring
Leases

 

Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue
Under
Expiring
Leases (1)

 

Average
Annual
Rental Rate
Per Square
Foot for
Expirations

 

Percent of
Annualized
Cash Rental
Revenue
Represented
by Expiring
Leases (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

 

 

2008 (4)

 

2,621,212

 

10.4

%

$

42,328

 

$

16.15

 

10.3

%

2009

 

3,531,397

 

14.0

 

 

55,360

 

 

15.68

 

13.5

 

2010

 

3,389,823

 

13.4

 

 

59,892

 

 

17.67

 

14.7

 

2011

 

3,744,315

 

14.8

 

 

57,704

 

 

15.41

 

14.0

 

2012

 

2,878,136

 

11.4

 

 

53,877

 

 

18.72

 

13.1

 

2013

 

1,828,626

 

7.2

 

 

29,784

 

 

16.29

 

7.2

 

2014

 

1,832,951

 

7.3

 

 

26,133

 

 

14.26

 

6.4

 

2015

 

1,381,155

 

5.5

 

 

24,842

 

 

17.99

 

6.0

 

2016

 

1,070,477

 

4.2

 

 

17,364

 

 

16.22

 

4.2

 

2017

 

1,194,693

 

4.7

 

 

21,461

 

 

17.96

 

5.2

 

Thereafter

 

1,784,674

 

7.1

 

 

22,213

 

 

12.45

 

5.4

 

 

 

25,257,459

 

100.0

%

$

410,958

 

$

16.27

 

100.0

%

                              

(1)

Annualized Cash Rental Revenue is cash rental revenue (base rent plus additional rent based on the level of operating expenses, excluding straight-line rent) for the month of December 2007 multiplied by 12.

(2)

Includes 13,000 square feet of leases that are on a month-to-month basis, which represent 0.1% of total annualized cash rental revenue.

(3)

Excludes the following joint venture properties that are consolidated but are not Wholly Owned Properties: (1) one office property that was sold to SF-HIW Harborview Plaza, LP, a 20% owned joint venture, but which is accounted for as a financing under SFAS No. 66 and thus remains consolidated as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and (2) four office properties owned by Highwoods-Markel Associates, LLC, a 50% owned joint venture, which is consolidated beginning January 1, 2006, as described in Notes 1 and 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4)

Includes 127,000 square feet of leases that are on a month-to-month basis, which represent 0.4% of total annualized cash rental revenue.

 

15

 

 

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are from time to time a party to a variety of legal proceedings, claims and assessments arising in the ordinary course of our business. We regularly assess the liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters based on the latest information available. For those matters where it is probable that we have incurred or will incur a loss and the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated, the estimated loss is accrued and charged to income in the Consolidated Financial Statements. In other instances, because of the uncertainties related to both the probable outcome and amount or range of loss, a reasonable estimate of liability, if any, cannot be made. Based on the current expected outcome of such matters, none of these proceedings, claims or assessments is expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In 2006 and March 2007, we received assessments for state excise taxes and related interest amounting to approximately $5.5 million, related to periods 2002 through 2005. In the fourth quarter of 2006, approximately $0.5 million was accrued and charged to operating expenses in anticipation of a probable settlement of these claims. We received an executed settlement agreement relating to these claims in October 2007, which resulted in no change to the amount previously accrued and paid. Legal fees related to this matter were nominal and were charged to operating expenses as incurred in 2006 and 2007.

 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

None.

 

16

 

 

 

ITEM X. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to our executive officers:

 

Name

Age

Position and Background

Edward J. Fritsch

49

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Mr. Fritsch became our chief executive officer and chair of the investment committee of our board of directors on July 1, 2004 and our president in December 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Fritsch was our chief operating officer from January 1998 to July 2004 and was a vice president and secretary from June 1994 to January 1998. Mr. Fritsch joined our predecessor in 1982 and was a partner of that entity at the time of our initial public offering in June 1994. Mr. Fritsch is chairman of the University of North Carolina’s Board of Visitors and also serves on the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, the Board of Trustees of St. Timothy’s Episcopal School and the Board of Directors of the Triangle Chapter of the YMCA.

Michael E. Harris

58

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.

Mr. Harris became chief operating officer in July 2004. Prior to that, Mr. Harris was a senior vice president and was responsible for our operations in Memphis, Nashville, Kansas City and Charlotte. Mr. Harris was executive vice president of Crocker Realty Trust prior to its merger with us in 1996. Before joining Crocker Realty Trust, Mr. Harris served as senior vice president, general counsel and chief financial officer of Towermarc Corporation, a privately owned real estate development firm. Mr. Harris is a member of the Advisory Board of Directors of SouthTrust Bank of Memphis and Allen & Hoshall, Inc.

Terry L. Stevens

59

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

Prior to joining us in December 2003, Mr. Stevens was executive vice president, chief financial officer and trustee for Crown American Realty Trust, a public REIT. Before joining Crown American Realty Trust, Mr. Stevens was director of financial systems development at AlliedSignal, Inc., a large multi-national manufacturer. Mr. Stevens was also an audit partner with Price Waterhouse for approximately seven years. Mr. Stevens currently serves as trustee, chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Investment and Finance Committee of First Potomac Realty Trust, a public REIT. Mr. Stevens is a member of the American and the Pennsylvania Institutes of Certified Public Accountants.

Gene H. Anderson

62

Director, Senior Vice President and Regional Manager.

Mr. Anderson has been a senior vice president since our combination with Anderson Properties, Inc. in February 1997, and in July 2006 became Executive Vice President of Highwoods Development, LLC, a taxable subsidiary of the Company formed to pursue the development of office and industrial properties for existing customers in core and non-core markets. Additionally, Mr. Anderson oversees our Atlanta and Triad operations. Mr. Anderson served as president of Anderson Properties, Inc. from 1978 to February 1997. Mr. Anderson was past president of the Georgia chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties and is a national board member of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties.

 

 

17

 

 

 

Name

Age

Position and Background

Michael F. Beale

54

Senior Vice President and Regional Manager.

Mr. Beale manages our Orlando and oversees our Tampa operations. Prior to joining us in 2000, Mr. Beale served as vice president of Koger Equity, Inc., where he was responsible for Koger’s acquisitions and developments throughout the Southeast. Mr. Beale is currently the president of the Central Florida Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties and also serves on various committees for the Mid-Florida Economic Development Commission.

Jeffrey D. Miller

37

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.

Prior to joining us in March 2007, Mr. Miller was a partner with DLA Piper US, LLP, where he practiced since 2005. Previously, he was a partner with Alston & Bird LLP, where he practiced from 1997. He is admitted to practice in North Carolina. Mr. Miller currently serves as director, chairman of the compensation and governance committee and member of the audit committee of Hatteras Financial Corp., a mortgage REIT.

W. Brian Reames

44

Senior Vice President and Regional Manager.

Mr. Reames became senior vice president and regional manager in August 2004. Mr. Reames manages our Nashville and oversees our Memphis, Greenville and Columbia operations. Prior to that, Mr. Reames was vice president responsible for the Nashville division, a position he held since 1999. Mr. Reames was a partner and owner at Eakin & Smith, Inc., a Nashville-based office real estate firm, from 1989 until its merger with us in 1996. Mr. Reames is a past Nashville chapter President of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties. He is currently serving on the Board of Directors of H.G. Hill Realty and the Nashville Zoo and as President of the Board of Trustees at Harding Academy in Nashville, Tennessee.

 

 

18

 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Our Common Stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “HIW.” The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low stock prices per share reported on the NYSE for the quarters indicated and the dividends paid per share during such quarter.

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

Quarter Ended

 

High

 

Low

 

Dividend

 

High

 

Low

 

Dividend

 

March 31

 

$

46.95

 

$

37.99

 

$

0.425

 

$

34.77

 

$

29.20

 

$

0.425

 

June 30

 

 

43.84

 

 

37.50

 

 

0.425

 

 

36.18

 

 

29.56

 

 

0.425

 

September 30

 

 

39.01

 

 

32.09

 

 

0.425

 

 

38.15

 

 

35.39

 

 

0.425

 

December 31

 

 

38.26

 

 

28.89

 

 

0.425

 

 

41.31

 

 

36.40

 

 

0.425

 

 

On December 31, 2007, the last reported stock price of our Common Stock on the NYSE was $29.38 per share and we had 1,179 common stockholders of record.

 

The following stock price performance graph compares the performance of our Common Stock to the S&P 500, the Russell 2000 and the FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index. The stock price performance graph assumes an investment of $100 in our Common Stock and the three indices on December 31, 2002 and further assumes the reinvestment of all dividends. Equity REITs are defined as those that derive more than 75.0% of their income from equity investments in real estate assets. The FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index includes all REITs listed on the NYSE, the American Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ National Market System. Stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

 


 

 

 

Period Ending

 

Index

 

12/31/02

 

12/31/03

 

12/31/04

 

12/31/05

 

12/31/06

 

12/31/07

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

 

100.0

 

124.86

 

145.91

 

159.30

 

239.82

 

180.67

 

S&P 500

 

100.0

 

128.68

 

142.69

 

149.70

 

173.34

 

182.86

 

Russell 2000

 

100.0

 

147.25

 

174.24

 

182.18

 

215.64

 

212.26

 

FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index

 

100.0

 

137.13

 

180.44

 

202.38

 

273.34

 

230.45

 

 

The performance graph is being furnished as part of this Annual Report solely in accordance with the requirement under Rule 14a-3(b)(9) to furnish our stockholders with such information and, therefore, is not deemed to be filed, or incorporated by reference in any filing, by the Company or the Operating Partnership under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

19

 

 

 

We intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends to holders of shares of Common Stock and make distributions to holders of Common Units. Future dividends and distributions will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our actual funds from operations, our financial condition, capital requirements, the annual dividend requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources –Stockholder Dividends.”

 

During 2007, cash dividends on Common Stock totaled $1.70 per share, $0.115 of which represented return of capital and $0.826 represented capital gains for income tax purposes. The minimum dividend per share of Common Stock required for us to maintain our REIT status (excluding any net capital gains) was $0.54 per share in 2007.

 

We issued 938 shares of Common Stock on December 27, 2007 upon the exercise of a like number of stock options at a purchase price of $27.00 per share and 256 shares of Common Stock on December 28, 2007 upon the exchange of 2,750 stock options at a purchase price of $27.00 per share. All of such stock options were scheduled to expire on January 25, 2008. Such shares were issued to directors in private transactions pursuant to Sections 3(a)(9) and 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

 

We have a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan under which holders of Common Stock may elect to automatically reinvest their dividends in additional shares of Common Stock and may make optional cash payments for additional shares of Common Stock. The administrator of the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan has been instructed by us to purchase Common Stock in the open market for purposes of satisfying our obligations thereunder. However, we may in the future elect to satisfy such obligations by issuing additional shares of Common Stock.

 

We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan for all active employees, under which participants may contribute up to 25.0% of their compensation for the purchase of Common Stock. Generally, at the end of each three-month offering period, each participant’s account balance is applied to acquire newly issued shares of Common Stock at a cost that is calculated at 85.0% of the lower of the average closing price on the NYSE on the five consecutive days preceding the first day of the quarter or the five days preceding the last day of the quarter.

 

Information about our equity compensation plans and other related stockholder matters is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 15, 2008.

 

20

 

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following selected financial data as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 is derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004 is derived from previously issued financial statements and, as required by SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” (“SFAS No. 144”), results and balance sheet data for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were reclassified from previously reported amounts to reflect in discontinued operations the operations for those properties sold or held for sale in 2007 which qualified for discontinued operations presentation. The information in the following table should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included herein ($ in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

Rental and other revenues

 

$

437,059

 

$

409,273

 

$

387,929

 

$

381,592

 

$

406,521

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

55,395

 

$

36,676

 

$

29,759

 

$

18,449

 

$

5,093

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income/(loss) from continuing operations
available for common stockholders

 

$

39,633

 

$

17,810

 

$

(1,751

)

$

(12,403

)

$

(25,759

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

90,745

 

$

53,744

 

$

62,458

 

$

41,577

 

$

42,649

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available for common stockholders

 

$

74,983

 

$

34,878

 

$

30,948

 

$

10,725

 

$

11,797

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income/(loss) from continuing operations

 

$

0.70

 

$

0.33

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.23

)

$

(0.49

)

Net income

 

$

1.33

 

$

0.64

 

$

0.58

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income/(loss) from continuing operations

 

$

0.69

 

$

0.32

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.23

)

$

(0.49

)

Net income

 

$

1.31

 

$

0.62

 

$

0.58

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

1.70

 

$

1.70

 

$

1.70

 

$

1.70

 

$

1.86

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

2,926,955

 

$

2,844,853

 

$

2,908,978

 

$

3,239,658

 

$

3,513,224

 

Total mortgage and notes payable

 

$

1,641,987

 

$

1,465,129

 

$

1,471,616

 

$

1,572,574

 

$

1,718,274

 

Financing obligations

 

$

35,071

 

$

35,530

 

$

34,154

 

$

65,309

 

$

125,777

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Some of the information in this Annual Report may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under this section and under the heading "Business." You can identify forward-looking statements by our use of forward-looking terminology such as "may,” "will,” "expect,” "anticipate,” "estimate,” "continue" or other similar words. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. When considering such forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the following important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement:

 

 

speculative development activity by our competitors in our existing markets could result in an excessive supply of office, industrial and retail properties relative to tenant demand;

 

 

the financial condition of our tenants could deteriorate;

 

 

we may not be able to complete development, acquisition, reinvestment, disposition or joint venture projects as quickly or on as favorable terms as anticipated;

 

 

we may not be able to lease or release space quickly or on as favorable terms as old leases;

 

 

increases in interest rates would increase our debt service costs;

 

 

we may not be able to meet our liquidity requirements or obtain capital on favorable terms, if at all, to fund our working capital needs and growth initiatives or to repay or refinance outstanding debt upon maturity;

 

 

we could lose key executive officers; and

 

 

our southeastern and midwestern markets may suffer declines in economic growth.

 

This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is not intended to be exhaustive. You should also review the other cautionary statements we make in “Business – Risk Factors” set forth in this Annual Report.

 

Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

OVERVIEW

 

We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed equity REIT that provides leasing, management, development, construction and other customer-related services for our properties and for third parties. As of December 31, 2007, we owned or had an interest in 378 in-service office, industrial and retail properties, encompassing approximately 33.9 million square feet and 527 rental residential units. As of that date, we also owned development land and other properties under development as described under “Business” and “Properties” above. We are based in Raleigh, North Carolina, and our properties and development land are located in Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia.

 

 

22

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Approximately 82% of our rental and other revenue from continuing operations in 2007 was derived from our office properties. As a result, while we own and operate a limited number of industrial, retail and residential properties, our operating results depend heavily on successfully leasing and operating our office properties. Furthermore, since approximately 80% of our annualized revenues from office properties come from properties located in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee, economic growth in those states is and will continue to be an important determinative factor in predicting our future operating results.

 

The key components affecting our rental revenue stream are dispositions, acquisitions, new developments placed in service, average occupancy and rental rates. Average occupancy generally increases during times of improving economic growth, as our ability to lease space outpaces vacancies that occur upon the expirations of existing leases. Average occupancy generally declines during times of slower economic growth, when new vacancies tend to outpace our ability to lease space. Asset acquisitions, dispositions and new developments placed in service directly impact our rental revenues and could impact our average occupancy, depending upon the occupancy rate of the properties that are acquired, sold or placed in service. A further indicator of the predictability of future revenues is the expected lease expirations of our portfolio. As a result, in addition to seeking to increase our average occupancy by leasing current vacant space, we also must concentrate our leasing efforts on renewing leases on expiring space. For more information regarding our lease expirations, see “Properties – Lease Expirations.”

 

Whether or not our rental revenue tracks average occupancy proportionally depends upon whether rents under new leases signed are higher or lower than the rents under the previous leases. The average rental rate per square foot on second generation renewal and relet leases signed in our Wholly Owned Properties compared to the rent under the previous leases (based on straight line rental rates) was 5.2% higher in 2007, 2.5% higher in 2006 and 2.2% lower in 2005. The annualized rental revenues from second generation leases signed during any particular year is generally less than 15% of our total annual rental revenues.

 

Our expenses primarily consist of rental property expenses, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses and interest expense. Rental property expenses are expenses associated with our ownership and operation of rental properties and include expenses that vary somewhat proportionately to occupancy levels, such as common area maintenance and utilities, and expenses that do not vary based on occupancy, such as property taxes and insurance. Depreciation and amortization is a non-cash expense associated with the ownership of real property and generally remains relatively consistent each year, unless we buy, place in service, or sell assets, since we depreciate our properties and related building and tenant improvement assets on a straight-line basis over a fixed life. General and administrative expenses, net of amounts capitalized, consist primarily of management and employee salaries and other personnel costs, corporate overhead and long-term incentive compensation. Interest expense depends upon the amount of our borrowings, the weighted average interest rates on our debt and the amount of interest capitalized on development projects.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We incur capital expenditures to lease space to our customers and to maintain the quality of our properties to successfully compete against other properties. Tenant improvements are the costs required to customize the space for the specific needs of the customer. Lease commissions are costs incurred to find the customer for the space. Lease incentives are costs paid to or on behalf of tenants to induce them to enter into leases and that do not relate to customizing the space for the tenant’s specific needs. Building improvements are recurring capital costs not related to a customer to maintain the buildings. As leases expire, we either attempt to relet the space to an existing customer or attract a new customer to occupy the space. Generally, customer renewals require lower leasing capital expenditures than reletting to new customers. However, market conditions such as supply of available space on the market, as well as demand for space, drive not only customer rental rates but also tenant improvement costs. Leasing capital expenditures are amortized over the term of the lease, and building improvements are depreciated over the appropriate useful life of the assets acquired. Both are included in depreciation and amortization in results of operations.

 

Because we are a REIT, we are required under the federal tax laws to pay dividends to our stockholders equal to at least 90.0% of our annual REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains. We generally use rents received from customers and proceeds from sales of non-core development land to fund our operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures and stockholder dividends. To fund property acquisitions, development activity or building

 

23

 

 

renovations, we may sell other assets and may incur debt from time to time. As of December 31, 2007, we had $665.3 million of secured debt outstanding and $976.7 million of unsecured debt outstanding. Our debt generally consists of mortgage debt, unsecured debt securities and borrowings under our credit facilities.

 

As of December 31, 2007 and February 27, 2008, we had approximately $220 million and $218 million, respectively, of additional borrowing availability under our unsecured revolving credit facility, and we had approximately $84 million and $80 million, respectively, of additional borrowing availability under our secured revolving construction loan facilities.

 

Our revolving credit facility and the indenture governing our outstanding long-term unsecured debt securities require us to satisfy various operating and financial covenants and performance ratios. As a result, to ensure that we do not violate the provisions of these debt instruments, we may from time to time be limited in undertaking certain activities that may otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders, such as repurchasing capital stock, acquiring additional assets, increasing the total amount of our debt or increasing stockholder dividends. We review our current and expected operating results, financial condition and planned strategic actions on an ongoing basis for the purpose of monitoring our continued compliance with these covenants and ratios. Any unwaived event of default could result in an acceleration of some or all of our debt, severely restrict our ability to incur additional debt to fund short- and long-term cash needs or result in higher interest expense.

 

To generate additional capital to fund our growth and other strategic initiatives and to lessen the ownership risks typically associated with owning 100.0% of a property, we may sell some of our properties or contribute them to joint ventures. When we create a joint venture with a partner, we usually contribute cash or wholly owned assets to a newly formed entity in which we retain an equal or minority interest. The joint venture itself will frequently borrow money on its own behalf to finance the acquisition of, and/or leverage the return upon, the properties being acquired by the joint venture or to build or acquire additional buildings. Such borrowings are typically on a non-recourse or limited recourse basis. We generally are not liable for the debts of our joint ventures, except to the extent of our equity investment, unless we have directly guaranteed any of that debt. In most cases, we and/or our partners are required to agree to customary exceptions to non-recourse liability in non-recourse loans. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on certain debt guarantees. We have historically also sold additional Common Stock or Preferred Stock or issued Common Units to fund additional growth or to reduce our debt, but we have limited those efforts since 1998 because funds generated from our capital recycling program in recent years have provided sufficient funds to satisfy our liquidity needs. In addition, we have recently used funds from our capital recycling program to redeem or repurchase Common Units and Preferred Stock for cash. In the future, we may from time to time retire some or all of our remaining outstanding Preferred Stock through redemptions, open market repurchases, privately negotiated acquisitions or otherwise.

 

As described in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in February 2008 we paid off the $100 million of unsecured notes that matured on February 1, 2008, and we obtained a new $137.5 million three-year unsecured term loan from a group of banks with interest at LIBOR plus 110 basis points; the proceeds were used to pay-down our revolving credit facility and for short-term investments. We have no further debt maturities in 2008, other than normal principal amortization on certain of secured loans. As noted above, as of February 27, 2008, we have $298 million of availability combined under our revolving credit and revolving construction facilities.

 

 

24

 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Comparison of 2007 to 2006

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 ($ in millions). As noted above and as more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, as required by SFAS No. 144, results for the year ended December 31, 2006 were reclassified from previously reported amounts to reflect in discontinued operations the operations for those properties sold in 2007 which qualified for discontinued operations presentation.

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2007 to 2006

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

$ Change

 

% of Change

 

Rental and other revenues

 

$

437.1

 

$

409.3

 

$

27.8

 

6.8

%

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental property and other expenses

 

 

157.3

 

 

150.5

 

 

6.8

 

4.5

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

122.2

 

 

112.9

 

 

9.3

 

8.2

 

Impairment of assets held for use

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

100.0

 

General and administrative

 

 

41.6

 

 

37.3

 

 

4.3

 

11.5

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

321.9

 

 

300.7

 

 

21.2

 

7.1

 

Interest expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractual

 

 

94.0

 

 

94.2

 

 

(0.2

)

(0.2

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

2.4

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

 

Financing obligations

 

 

3.9

 

 

4.2

 

 

(0.3

)

(7.1

)

 

 

 

100.3

 

 

100.8

 

 

(0.5

)

(0.5

)

Other income/(expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income

 

 

6.4

 

 

7.0

 

 

(0.6

)

(8.6

)

Settlement of bankruptcy claim

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

(1.6

)

(100.0

)

Loss on debt extinguishments

 

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

0.5

 

100.0

 

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

8.1

 

 

(1.7

)

(21.0

)

Income before disposition of property, insurance gain, minority
interest and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

21.3

 

 

15.9

 

 

5.4

 

34.0

 

Gains on disposition of property, net

 

 

20.6

 

 

16.2

 

 

4.4

 

27.2

 

Gain from property insurance settlement

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

 

4.1

 

100.0

 

Minority interest

 

 

(3.7

)

 

(2.2

)

 

(1.5

)

(68.2

)

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

13.1

 

 

6.8

 

 

6.3

 

92.6

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

55.4

 

 

36.7

 

 

18.7

 

51.0

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of minority
interest

 

 

1.9

 

 

3.2

 

 

(1.3

)

(40.6

)

Net gains on sales of discontinued operations, net of
minority interest

 

 

32.0

 

 

13.9

 

 

18.1

 

130.2

 

Release of FASB FIN 48 tax liability

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

100.0

 

 

 

 

35.4

 

 

17.1

 

 

18.3

 

107.0

 

Net income

 

 

90.8

 

 

53.8

 

 

37.0

 

68.8

 

Dividends on Preferred Stock

 

 

(13.5

)

 

(17.1

)

 

3.6

 

21.1

 

Excess of Preferred Stock redemption cost over carrying value

 

 

(2.3

)

 

(1.8

)

 

(0.5

)

(27.8

)

Net income available for common stockholders

 

$

75.0

 

$

34.9

 

$

40.1

 

114.9

%

 

Rental and Other Revenues

 

The increase in rental and other revenues from continuing operations was primarily the result of the contribution from development properties placed in service in the latter part of 2006 and in 2007, higher average occupancy in 2007 as compared to 2006, and higher average rental rates in 2007 compared to 2006.

 

 

25

 

 

There was modest but steady positive absorption of office space in most of our markets during 2007. Also, we expect to deliver approximately $211 million of new office and industrial development properties by the end of 2008, which are 56% pre-leased. We expect to sell additional non-core properties in 2008 that will probably be classified as discontinued operations.

 

Rental Property and Other Expenses

 

The increase in rental and other operating expenses primarily was a result of general inflationary increases in certain operating expenses, which include utility costs, insurance, real estate taxes, salaries, and benefits, and from expenses of development properties placed in service in 2006 and 2007.

 

Operating margin, defined as rental and other revenues less rental property and other expenses expressed as a percentage of rental and other revenues, increased from 63.2% in 2006 to 64.0% in 2007. This increase in margin was primarily attributed to higher average occupancy combined with certain operating expenses, such as taxes and insurance, being relatively fixed in the short term.

 

We expect rental and other operating expenses to increase in 2008 as compared to 2007 from anticipated inflationary increases in certain operating expenses, particularly higher real estate taxes and utility costs, and by operating expenses of the development properties placed in service during 2007 and 2008.

 

The increase in depreciation and amortization primarily results from development properties placed in service in 2006 and in 2007.

 

In 2007, a land parcel had indicators of impairment where the carrying value exceeded the sum of estimated undiscounted future cash flows. Therefore, impairment of assets held for use aggregating $0.8 million was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily related to higher write-offs of deferred development costs on projects that did not proceed or are deemed unlikely to occur in the future, higher annual and long-term incentive compensation costs, higher salary and fringe benefit costs from annual employee wage and salary increases, and inflationary effects on other general and administrative expenses.

 

Interest Expense

 

Contractual interest expense is shown net of amounts capitalized to development projects. The net decrease in contractual interest was primarily due to a decrease in weighted average interest rates on outstanding debt from 6.92% in the year ended December 31, 2006 to 6.74% in the year ended December 31, 2007, partly offset by an increase in average borrowings from $1,441 million in the year ended December 31, 2006 to $1,540 million in the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, capitalized interest in 2007 was approximately $4.7 million higher compared to 2006 due to increased development activity and higher average construction and development costs. Interest allocated to discontinued operations was $0.6 million in 2006.

 

Total interest expense is expected to increase in 2008 primarily from higher average borrowings compared to 2007 due to expected borrowings to fund existing and future development projects. If proceeds from property dispositions exceed cash requirements for our development and other investing activities, average debt balances in 2008 may not exceed those of 2007. Average interest rates are expected to be lower in 2008 due to a projected decline in floating rates and to the retirement of $100 million of 7.125% bonds in early February 2008 through the use of less expensive floating rate debt.

 

Settlement of Bankruptcy Claim

 

In 2006, we received a settlement of a bankruptcy claim in the amount of $1.6 million related to leases with a former tenant that were terminated in 2003. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

26

 

 

 

Loss on Debt Extinguishments

 

In 2006, we had $0.5 million from losses on early extinguishments of debt, including our prior revolving credit facility and bank term loan, which were paid off in the second quarter of 2006 upon the closing of our current revolving credit facility.

 

Gains on Disposition of Property; Gain from Property Insurance Settlement; Minority Interest; Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates

 

Net gains on dispositions of properties not classified as discontinued operations were $20.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $16.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006; the components of net gains are described in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Gains are dependent on the specific assets sold, their historical cost basis and other factors, and can vary significantly from period to period.

 

In 2007, we recorded a $4.1 million gain from finalization of a prior year insurance claim. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

Minority interest changed from $2.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2006 to $3.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase is due primarily to significantly higher net income in 2007 of the Operating Partnership, after Preferred Unit distributions, compared to 2006.

 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates increased $6.3 million from 2006 to 2007. The increase primarily resulted from the following transactions. In 2007, the Weston Lakeside joint venture sold 332 rental residential units, recognizing a gain of approximately $11.3 million, which resulted in an increase of approximately $5.0 million in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates. Five properties owned by our DLF I joint venture (“DLF I”) were sold and the joint venture recognized a gain of approximately $9.3 million, resulting in an increase of approximately $2.1 million in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in 2007. Additionally, in 2007, DLF I received a lease termination, of which the net effect was $2.7 million, which resulted in an increase of approximately $0.6 million in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates. (See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion related to these transactions). These increases are offset by $1.7 million of adjustments to depreciation expense related to certain of our unconsolidated affiliates.

 

Discontinued Operations

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we classified income of $35.4 million and $17.1 million as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These amounts relate to 4.2 million square feet of office and industrial properties and 173 residential units sold during 2006 and 2007. These amounts include net gains on the sale of these properties of $32.0 million and $13.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

During 2007, we recorded $1.5 million in income from the release of a liability recorded in accordance with the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”). See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

Preferred Stock Dividends and Excess of Preferred Stock Redemption Cost Over Carrying Value

 

The decrease in Preferred Stock dividends and increase in excess of Preferred Stock redemption costs over carrying value were due to the retirement of $62.3 million of Preferred Stock in 2007 as compared to the retirement of $50.0 million of Preferred Stock in 2006.

 

Net Income and Net Income Available for Common Stockholders

 

We recorded net income of $90.8 million in 2007 compared to $53.8 million in 2006, and net income available for common stockholders of $75.0 million in 2007 compared to $34.9 million in 2006; these changes resulted from the various factors described above.

 

27

 

 

 

Comparison of 2006 to 2005

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 ($ in millions). As noted above and as more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, as required by SFAS No. 144, results for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were reclassified from previously reported amounts to reflect in discontinued operations the operations for those properties sold in 2006 or 2007 which qualified for discontinued operations presentation.

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2006 to 2005

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

$ Change

 

% of Change

 

Rental and other revenues

 

$

409.3

 

$

387.9

 

$

21.4

 

5.5

%

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental property and other expenses

 

 

150.5

 

 

138.5

 

 

12.0

 

8.7

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

112.9

 

 

107.1

 

 

5.8

 

5.4

 

Impairment of assets held for use

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

(3.2

)

(100.0

)

General and administrative

 

 

37.3

 

 

33.1

 

 

4.2

 

12.7

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

300.7

 

 

281.9

 

 

18.8

 

6.7

 

Interest expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractual

 

 

94.2

 

 

98.2

 

 

(4.0

)

(4.1

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

2.4

 

 

3.4

 

 

(1.0

)

(29.4

)

Financing obligations

 

 

4.2

 

 

5.0

 

 

(0.8

)

(16.0

)

 

 

 

100.8

 

 

106.6

 

 

(5.8

)

(5.4

)

Other income/(expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income

 

 

7.0

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

 

Settlement of bankruptcy claim

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

100.0

 

Loss on debt extinguishments

 

 

(0.5

)

 

(0.4

)

 

(0.1

)

(25.0

)

 

 

 

8.1

 

 

6.6

 

 

1.5

 

22.7

 

Income before disposition of property, minority interest and
equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

15.9

 

 

6.0

 

 

9.9

 

165.0

 

Gains on disposition of property, net

 

 

16.2

 

 

14.2

 

 

2.0

 

14.1

 

Minority interest

 

 

(2.2

)

 

0.2

 

 

(2.4

)

(1,200.0

)

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

6.8

 

 

9.3

 

 

(2.5

)

(26.9

)

Income from continuing operations

 

 

36.7

 

 

29.7

 

 

7.0

 

23.6

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of minority
interest

 

 

3.2

 

 

9.5

 

 

(6.3

)

(66.3

)

Net gains on sales of discontinued operations, net of
minority interest

 

 

13.9

 

 

23.2

 

 

(9.3

)

(40.1

)

 

 

 

17.1

 

 

32.7

 

 

(15.6

)

(47.7

)

Net income

 

 

53.8

 

 

62.4

 

 

(8.6

)

(13.8

)

Dividends on Preferred Stock

 

 

(17.1

)

 

(27.2

)

 

10.1

 

37.1

 

Excess of Preferred Stock redemption cost over carrying value

 

 

(1.8

)

 

(4.3

)

 

2.5

 

58.1

 

Net income available for common stockholders

 

$

34.9

 

$

30.9

 

$

4.0

 

12.9

%

 

Rental and Other Revenues

 

The increase in rental and other revenues from continuing operations was primarily the result of higher average occupancy in 2006 as compared to 2005, the contribution from development properties placed in service in the latter part of 2005 and in 2006 and the consolidation of the Markel joint venture effective January 1, 2006, as discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These increases were partly offset by a decrease in lease termination fees from 2005 to 2006 and the recognition of Eastshore as a completed sale which occurred in the third quarter of 2005.

 

 

28

 

 

Rental Property and Other Expenses

 

The increase in rental and other operating expenses primarily was a result of general inflationary increases in certain operating expenses, such as salaries, benefits, utility costs and real estate taxes, expenses of development properties placed in service in the latter part of 2005 and 2006 and the consolidation of the Markel joint venture effective January 1, 2006, as discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These increases were partly offset by a decrease in operating expenses as a result of the recognition of Eastshore as a completed sale which occurred in the third quarter of 2005.

 

Operating margin, defined as rental and other revenues less rental property and other expenses expressed as a percentage of rental and other revenues, decreased from 64.3% in 2005 to 63.2% in 2006. This decrease in margin was primarily caused by operating expenses increasing from inflationary pressures at a higher rate than our rental revenues and operating cost recoveries.

 

The increase in depreciation and amortization is primarily a result of the contribution from development properties placed in service in the latter part of 2005 and in 2006 and the consolidation of the Markel joint venture effective January 1, 2006, as discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These increases were partly offset by a decrease related to the recognition of Eastshore as a completed sale which occurred in the third quarter of 2005.

 

For 2005, one land parcel had indicators of impairment where the carrying value exceeded the sum of estimated undiscounted future cash flows. Therefore, impairment of assets held for use of $3.2 million was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily related to higher annual and long-term incentive compensation costs and from deferred compensation, a portion of which is recognized based on increases in the total return on our Common Stock, which was 50.6% in 2006, higher salary and fringe benefit costs from annual employee wage and salary increases, inflationary effects on other general and administrative expenses and costs related to the retirement of a certain officer at June 30, 2006.

 

Interest Expense

 

The decrease in contractual interest was primarily due to a decrease in average borrowings from $1,511 million in the year ended December 31, 2005 to $1,441 million in the year ended December 31, 2006, partially offset by an increase in weighted average interest rates on outstanding debt from 6.80% in the year ended December 31, 2005 to 6.92% in the year ended December 31, 2006. In addition, capitalized interest in 2006 was approximately $2.1 million higher compared to 2005 due to increased development activity and higher average construction and development costs. Interest allocated to discontinued operations was $1.2 million in 2005 compared to $0.6 million in 2006.

 

The decrease in amortization of deferred financing costs was primarily related to obtaining the new revolving credit facility in May 2006, as discussed further in the Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, resulting in a reduction of amortization of deferred financing costs of approximately $1.0 million from 2005 to 2006.

 

The decrease in interest from financing obligations was primarily a result of the completed sale of three buildings in Richmond, Virginia (the Eastshore transaction) in the third quarter of 2005 and the elimination of the related financing obligation. Partly offsetting this decrease was an increase in 2006 related to SF-HIW Harborview Plaza LP primarily from amortization of the option discount, as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Settlement of Bankruptcy Claim

 

In 2006, we received a settlement of a bankruptcy claim in the amount of $1.6 million related to leases with a former tenant that were terminated in 2003. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

29

 

 

 

Loss on Debt Extinguishments

 

In 2006, we had $0.5 million from losses on early extinguishments of debt, including our prior revolving credit facility and bank term loan, which were paid off in the second quarter of 2006 upon the closing of our current revolving credit facility. The $0.4 million of loss in 2005 relates to loans that were paid off early in 2005 from proceeds raised from disposition activities.

 

Gains on Disposition of Property; Minority Interest; Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates

 

Net gains on dispositions of properties not classified as discontinued operations were $16.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $14.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005; the components of net gains are described in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Gains are dependent on the specific assets sold, their historical cost basis and other factors, and can vary significantly from period to period.

 

Minority interest changed from $0.2 million of income in the year ended December 31, 2005 to $2.2 million of expense in the year ended December 31, 2006. In 2005, the Operating Partnership had a loss from continuing operations after Preferred Unit distributions which caused minority interest income. In 2006, the Operating Partnership had income from continuing operations after Preferred Unit distributions, resulting in minority interest expense related to the Operating Partnership. In addition, minority interest in 2006 includes $0.6 million from the consolidation of the Markel joint venture, the accounting for which changed from equity method to consolidation effective January 1, 2006, as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

The decrease in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates primarily resulted from the consolidation of the Markel joint venture in 2006, and from $0.7 million of our share of a loss on early debt extinguishment from refinancing of loans in the Des Moines joint ventures in the third quarter of 2006. The Markel joint venture contributed $0.8 million to equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates during the year ended December 31, 2005. In addition, capitalization of interest ceased and full depreciation commenced beginning December 2005 for the office property in the Plaza Colonnade, LLC joint venture which caused an approximate $0.6 million reduction in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in 2006 compared to 2005.

 

Discontinued Operations

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we classified income of $17.1 million and $32.7 million as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These amounts relate to 8.9 million square feet of office and industrial properties and 202 residential units sold during 2005, 2006 and 2007. These amounts include net gains on the sale of these properties of $13.9 million and $23.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

 

Preferred Stock Dividends and Excess of Preferred Stock Redemption Cost Over Carrying Value

 

The decreases in Preferred Stock dividends and excess of Preferred Stock redemption costs over carrying value were due to the redemptions of $130.0 million of Preferred Stock in the third quarter of 2005 and $50.0 million of Preferred Stock in the first quarter of 2006.

 

Net Income and Net Income Available for Common Stockholders

 

We recorded net income of $53.8 million in 2006 compared to $62.4 million in 2005, and net income available for common stockholders of $34.9 million in 2006 compared to $30.9 million in 2005; these changes resulted from the various factors described above.

 

 

30

 

 

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

As required by GAAP, we report and analyze our cash flows based on operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. The following table sets forth the changes in our cash flows from 2006 to 2007 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

Change

 

Cash Provided By Operating Activities

 

$

164,080

 

$

145,525

 

$

18,555

 

Cash (Used In)/Provided By Investing Activities

 

 

(153,121

)

 

64,734

 

 

(217,855

)

Cash Used In Financing Activities

 

 

(24,509

)

 

(194,781

)

 

170,272

 

Total Cash Flows

 

$

(13,550

)

$

15,478

 

$

(29,028

)

 

In calculating cash flow from operating activities, depreciation and amortization, which are non-cash expenses, are added back to net income. As a result, we have historically generated a significant positive amount of cash from operating activities. From period to period, cash flow from operations depends primarily upon changes in our net income, as discussed more fully above under “Results of Operations,” changes in receivables and payables, and net additions or decreases in our overall portfolio, which affect the amount of depreciation and amortization expense.

 

Cash provided by or used in investing activities generally relates to capitalized costs incurred for leasing and major building improvements and our acquisition, development, disposition and joint venture activity. During periods of significant net acquisition and/or development activity, our cash used in such investing activities will generally exceed cash provided by investing activities, which typically consists of cash received upon the sale of properties and distributions of capital from our joint ventures.

 

Cash used in financing activities generally relates to stockholder dividends, distributions on Common Units, incurrence and repayment of debt and sales, repurchases or redemptions of Common Stock, Common Units and Preferred Stock. As discussed previously, we use a significant amount of our cash to fund stockholder dividends and Common Unit distributions. Whether or not we have increases in the outstanding balances of debt during a period depends generally upon the net effect of our acquisition, disposition, development and joint venture activity. We use our revolving credit facility for working capital purposes, which means that during any given period, in order to minimize interest expense, we will likely record significant repayments and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

 

The increase of $18.6 million in cash provided by operating activities in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 was primarily the result of higher cash flows from net income as adjusted for changes in gains on disposition of properties, a gain from a property insurance settlement, minority interest, and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates. In addition, the net change in operating assets and liabilities resulted in an $11.6 million increase in cash provided by operating activities from 2006 to 2007.

 

The decrease of $217.9 million in cash provided by investing activities in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 was primarily a result of a $115.6 million decrease in proceeds from dispositions of real estate assets and a $65.5 million increase in additions to real estate assets and deferred leasing costs. In addition, changes in restricted cash and other investing activities resulted in a decrease of $43.0 million primarily due to cash received from escrow during 2006 relating to a collateral substitution on an existing secured loan and outflows of cash in 2007 related to proceeds from dispositions which were set aside and designated for potential future tax-deferred real estate transactions and for the short-term purchase of tax increment financing bonds related to an office building and garage constructed by us. Partly offsetting these decreases were proceeds of $4.9 million which were received in 2007 for a property insurance settlement.

 

The decrease of $170.3 million in cash used in financing activities in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 was primarily a result of a $214.3 million increase in net borrowings on the revolving credit facility and mortgages and notes payable and an increase of $4.9 million due to contributions from our minority interest partners (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) for 2007 compared to 2006. These decreases were partly offset by a

 

31

 

 

$35.7 million decrease in net proceeds from the sale of Common Stock, an increase of $12.3 million of cash used for the redemption and repurchase of Preferred Stock and an increase of $1.0 million for cash used in connection with the repurchase of Common Units from 2006 to 2007.

 

During 2008, we expect to have positive cash flows from operating activities. The net cash flows from investing activities in 2008 are expected to be negative as cash inflows from property dispositions and joint ventures are expected to be less than cash used for development, capitalized leasing and tenant improvement costs. Net cash flows from operating and investing activities combined in 2008 are expected to be positive and, together with positive financing cash flows from new debt borrowings or other sources, will be used to pay stockholder and unitholder distributions, scheduled debt maturities, principal amortization payments and any other reductions of debt and Preferred Stock balances (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

Capitalization

 

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

 

December 31,
2007

 

December 31,
2006

 

Mortgages and notes payable, at recorded book value

 

$

1,641,987

 

$

1,465,129

 

Financing obligations

 

$

35,071

 

$

35,530

 

Preferred Stock, at liquidation value

 

$

135,437

 

$

197,445

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock and Common Units outstanding

 

 

61,224

 

 

60,944

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per share stock price at year end

 

$

29.38

 

$

40.76

 

Market value of Common Stock and Common Units

 

 

1,798,761

 

 

2,484,077

 

Total market capitalization with debt and obligations

 

$

3,611,256

 

$

4,182,181

 

 

Based on our total market capitalization of approximately $3.6 billion at December 31, 2007 (at the December 31, 2007 per share stock price of $29.38 and assuming the redemption for shares of Common Stock of the approximate 4.1 million Common Units not owned by the Company), our mortgages and notes payable represented 45.5% of our total market capitalization. Mortgages and notes payable at December 31, 2007 was comprised of $665 million of secured indebtedness with a weighted average interest rate of 6.62% and $977 million of unsecured indebtedness with a weighted average interest rate of 6.42%. As of December 31, 2007, our outstanding mortgages and notes payable and financing obligations were secured by real estate assets with an aggregate undepreciated book value of approximately $1.0 billion.

 

We do not intend to reserve funds to retire existing secured or unsecured debt upon maturity. For a more complete discussion of our long-term liquidity needs, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Current and Future Cash Needs.”

 

 

32

 

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The following table sets forth a summary regarding our known contractual obligations, including required interest payments for those items that are interest bearing, at December 31, 2007 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts due during years ending December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

Thereafter

 

Mortgages and Notes Payable (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal payments

 

$

1,641,987

 

$

109,937

 

$

409,723

 

$

28,747

 

$

9,507

 

$

212,166

 

$

871,907

 

Interest payments (2)

 

 

568,438

 

 

99,846

 

 

84,294

 

 

70,412

 

 

69,370

 

 

55,570

 

 

188,946

 

Financing Obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SF-HIW Harborview Plaza, LP
financing obligation (3)

 

 

15,619

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,619

 

Tax Increment Financing
obligation (4)

 

 

26,183

 

 

2,182

 

 

2,182

 

 

2,182

 

 

2,182

 

 

2,182

 

 

15,273

 

Capitalized ground lease obligation

 

 

1,951

 

 

52

 

 

52

 

 

52

 

 

52

 

 

52

 

 

1,691

 

Capitalized lease obligations (5)

 

 

333

 

 

229

 

 

82

 

 

16

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase Obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Completion contracts (8)

 

 

58,942

 

 

58,942

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Lease Obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land leases (6)

 

 

50,028

 

 

1,077

 

 

1,118

 

 

1,135

 

 

1,155

 

 

1,175

 

 

44,368

 

Other Long Term Liabilities
Reflected on the Balance Sheet:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaza Colonnade lease guarantee (6)

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highwoods DLF 97/26 DLF
99/32 LP lease guarantee (6)

 

 

209

 

 

209

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RRHWoods, LLC (6)

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RRHWoods, LLC and Dallas County
Partners lease guarantee (6)

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68

 

Industrial environmental
guarantee (6)

 

 

125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

125

 

DLF payable (7)

 

 

3,026

 

 

536

 

 

546

 

 

556

 

 

567

 

 

578

 

 

243

 

KC Orlando, LLC lease
guarantee (6)

 

 

323

 

 

97

 

 

97

 

 

97

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

KC Orlando, LLC accrued lease
commissions, tenant improvements
and building improvements (6)

 

 

296

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

296

 

RRHWoods, LLC (6)

 

 

324

 

 

 

 

 

 

324

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total