SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

Check the appropriate box:

o  Preliminary Proxy Statement	o  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x  Definitive Proxy Statement
o  Definitive Additional Materials
o  Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

Sonoco Products Company

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x No fee required.

o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

     (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

     (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

     (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

     (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     (5) Total fee paid:

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule  0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

     (1) Amount Previously Paid:

     (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

     (3) Filing Party:

     (4) Date Filed:

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY

1 NORTH SECOND STREET

HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 USA

March 16, 2005                      

To Our Shareholders:

      You are cordially invited to attend our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting to be held at the Center Theater, 212 North Fifth Street, Hartsville, South Carolina, on Wednesday, April 20, 2005, at 11:00 a.m.

      We have enclosed a Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement that cover the details of matters to be presented at the meeting.

      In addition to acting on the matters listed in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we will discuss the Company’s progress, and you will be given an opportunity to ask questions of general interest to all shareholders.

      We have also enclosed a copy of the 2004 Annual Report, which reviews the Company’s past year’s events and discusses strategy and the outlook for the future (or we have delivered a single copy of the Annual Report for all shareholders at your address).

      We hope that you will come to the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person; but even if you plan to come, we strongly encourage you to complete the enclosed proxy appointment and return it to us in the enclosed business reply envelope. Or, you can vote by telephone (if you live in the United States or Canada) or via the Internet. Instructions are shown on your proxy card. If you are a shareholder of record and later find you can be present or if for any reason you desire to revoke your proxy, you can do so at any time before the voting. Your vote is important and will be greatly appreciated.

Charles W. Coker Chairman	Harris E. DeLoach, Jr. President & Chief Executive Officer

NOTICE OF 2005 ANNUAL

SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING

and

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Notice of 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders		4
Information Concerning the Solicitation		5
Election of Directors		7
Information Concerning Directors Whose Terms Continue		9
Director Independence Policies		13
Meetings of Non-Management Directors		14
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics		14
Board Committees		15
Directors’ Compensation		21
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation		21
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		22
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners		23
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance		23
Security Ownership of Management		24
Executive Compensation Committee Report to Shareholders		26
Comparative Company Performance		32
Summary Compensation Table		33
Long-Term Incentive Plans – Awards in Last Fiscal Year		34
Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values		35
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year		36
Pension Plan Table		37
Audit Committee Report		38
Independent Auditors		38
Incorporation by Reference		40
Shareholder Proposals for Next Annual Meeting		40
Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors		40
Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address		41
Electronic Access to Annual Meeting Materials		41
Other Matters		42

3

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY

1 NORTH SECOND STREET

HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 USA

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TIME	11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, April 20, 2005
PLACE	The Center Theater, 212 North Fifth Street, Hartsville, South Carolina
PURPOSES	(1) To elect six members of the Board of Directors, four to serve for the next three years and two for the next year.
	(2) To transact any other business that properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment of the meeting.
RECORD DATE	You can vote if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on February 18, 2005.
ANNUAL REPORT	We have enclosed a copy of the 2004 Annual Report or we have delivered a single copy of the Annual Report for all shareholders at your address. The Annual Report is not part of the proxy soliciting material.
PROXY VOTING	It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Please vote in one of these three ways:
	(1) USE THE TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER shown on your proxy card if you live in the United States or Canada;
	(2) VISIT THE WEB SITE shown on your proxy card and vote via the Internet; OR
	(3) MARK, SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Charles J. Hupfer

Secretary

March 16, 2005

4

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY

1 NORTH SECOND STREET

HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 USA

PROXY STATEMENT

INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SOLICITATION

      We are sending you these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Sonoco Products Company of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”) to be held on April 20, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. at The Center Theater, 212 North Fifth Street, Hartsville, South Carolina, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. “We,” “our,” “us,” “Sonoco” and “the Company” all refer to Sonoco Products Company. The proxy materials are being mailed on or about March 16, 2005.

Who May Vote

      You will only be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting if our records show that you held your shares on February 18, 2005. At the close of business on February 18, 2005, a total of 98,676,304 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of Common Stock has one vote.

Voting by Proxy

      If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, it will send you instructions that you must follow to have your shares voted at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in your own name as a record holder, you may instruct the proxy agents how to vote your shares by completing, signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope; by dialing the toll-free telephone number shown on your proxy card (if you live in the United States or Canada); or by accessing the Web site shown on your proxy card. Of course, you can always come to the meeting and vote your shares in person.

      The proxy agents will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign and return your proxy card without giving instructions, the proxy agents will vote your shares FOR each person named in this Proxy Statement as a nominee for election to the Board of Directors. The proxy agents will vote according to their best judgment on any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting. At present, the Board of Directors does not know of any other such matters.

5

How to Revoke Your Proxy

      You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted. If you are a record shareholder, you may revoke your proxy in any of the following ways:

•  by giving notice of revocation at the Annual Meeting;

•  by delivering to the Secretary of the Company, 1 North Second Street, Hartsville, South Carolina, 29550 USA, written instructions revoking your proxy; or

•  by delivering to the Secretary an executed proxy bearing a later date.

      Subsequent voting by telephone or via the Internet cancels your previous vote. If you are a shareholder of record, you may also attend the meeting and vote in person, in which case your proxy vote will not be used.

How Votes Will Be Counted

      The Annual Meeting will be held if a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote (a “quorum”) is represented at the meeting. If you have submitted valid proxy instructions or attend the meeting in person, your shares will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you wish to abstain from voting on some or all matters introduced. “Broker non-votes” also count in determining whether a quorum is present. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker, bank or nominee who holds shares for a beneficial owner attends the meeting in person or by proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker, bank or nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

      If a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Votes that are withheld or that are not voted in the election of directors will have no effect on the outcome of election of directors. Cumulative voting is not permitted.

      Approval of any other matter that may be brought before the meeting requires that the votes cast in favor of the matter exceed the votes cast against the matter. Votes that are withheld or shares that are not voted will have no effect on the outcome of such matters.

Cost of this Proxy Solicitation

      We will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, we expect that some of our officers and regular employees will solicit proxies by telephone, fax, email or personal contact. None of these officers or employees will receive any additional or special compensation for doing this.

6

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

      At our Annual Meeting, six directors will be elected. Messrs. C. J. Bradshaw, R. J. Brown, J. L. Coker, and Paul Fulton have been nominated to hold office for the next three years, their terms expiring at the Annual Shareholders’ meeting in 2008, or when their successors are duly elected and qualify to serve. Dr. P. S. Lewis, who was elected by the Board of Directors in July 2004 to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Ms. D. D. Young, and Mr. J. E. Linville, who was elected by the Board of Directors in October 2004, have each been nominated to hold office for the next year. Their terms will expire at the Annual Shareholders’ meeting in 2006, or when their successors are duly elected and qualify to serve. The proxy agents intend to vote FOR the election of the six persons named above unless you withhold authority to vote for all or any of the nominees. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each nominee for election.

	Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five
	Years and Directorships in Public Corporations	Director Since
	CHARLES J. BRADSHAW (68). Mr. Bradshaw has been President and a director of Bradshaw Investments, Inc. (private investments), Georgetown, South Carolina, since 1986. Mr. Bradshaw was President and Chief Operating Officer of Transworld Corporation, New York, New York, from 1984 to 1986 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Spartan Food Systems, Inc., Spartanburg, South Carolina, from 1961 to 1986.		1986
	ROBERT J. BROWN (70). Mr. Brown, Founder of B&C Associates, Inc. (management consulting, marketing research and public relations firm), High Point, North Carolina, has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of his company since 1973. He is a director of Wachovia Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, AutoNation, Inc. and Aaipharma, Inc.		1993
	*JAMES L. COKER (64). Mr. Coker has been President of JLC Enterprises (private investments), Stonington, Connecticut, since 1979. He was Secretary of the Company from 1969 to 1995 and was President of Sonoco Limited, Canada, from 1972 to 1979.		1969

*  C. W. Coker and F. L. H. Coker are brothers and are first cousins of J. L. Coker.

7

	Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five
	Years and Directorships in Public Corporations	Director Since
	PAUL FULTON (70). Mr. Fulton has been Chairman since 2000 and a director since 1997 of Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. (furniture maker), Bassett, Virginia. He was Chief Executive Officer of Bassett from 1997 to 2000. Mr. Fulton was Dean of The Kenan-Flagler Business School, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, from 1994 to 1997. He was President of Sara Lee Corporation, Chicago, Illinois, from 1988 through 1993. Mr. Fulton is a director of Bank of America Corporation, Carter’s, Inc. and Lowe’s Companies, Inc.		1989
	DR. PAMELA S. LEWIS (48). Dr. Lewis has been President of Queens University of Charlotte (institution of higher learning), Charlotte, North Carolina since 2002. Prior to that she was Dean of the McColl School of Business at Queens University of Charlotte from 2000 to 2002. Dr. Lewis was Professor of Management and Dean of the LeBow College of Business at Drexel University from 1997 to 2000. She is a director of Charming Shoppes and of C&D Technologies, Inc.		2004
	JOHN E. LINVILLE (59). Mr. Linville has been an attorney in private practice in New York, New York, since 2004. Prior to that he was counsel with Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP since 2003. He joined the firm through its merger with his prior firm – Kalkines, Arky, Zall & Bernstein, LLP (KAZB). Mr. Linville joined KAZB in 1990 after having been General Counsel and then Acting President of the New York Health & Hospitals Corporation.		2004

      Mr. H. L. McColl, Jr., whose term is expiring at this Annual Meeting, has decided to retire from the Board and will not be a candidate for re-election. Mr. McColl’s service on various Board committees (as indicated on the following pages) will continue until his retirement.

      Following the retirement of Mr. McColl and pursuant to authority granted to it under the bylaws, the Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors of the Company at fifteen.

      The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Directors nominees to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors as they occur and recommends candidates for election as directors at Annual Meetings of Shareholders. Dr. Lewis and Mr. Linville were nominated to become directors through this process by the independent directors of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Dr. Lewis was recommended to the Committee by a non-management director and Mr. Linville was recommended by the Chairman of the Board. See page 18 for further information regarding Sonoco’s procedures for nominating directors.

8

INFORMATION CONCERNING DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS CONTINUE

      Members of the Board of Directors whose terms of office will continue until our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2006 are:

	Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five
	Years and Directorships in Public Corporations	Director Since
	HARRIS E. DeLOACH, JR. (60). Mr. DeLoach has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 2000. He was Chief Operating Officer from April 2000 to July 2000 and was Senior Executive Vice President from 1999 to 2000, Executive Vice President from 1996 to 1999, Group Vice President from 1993 to 1996, Vice President – Film, Plastics and Special Products from February 1993 to October 1993, Vice President – High Density Film Products division from 1990 to 1993 and Vice President – Administration and General Counsel from 1986 to 1990. Mr. DeLoach is a director of Goodrich Corporation.		1998
	EDGAR H. LAWTON, III (44). Mr. Lawton has been President and Treasurer of Hartsville Oil Mill (vegetable oil processor), Darlington, South Carolina, since 2000, and he has been a director since 1991. Mr. Lawton was Vice President of Hartsville Oil Mill from 1991 to 2000.		2001
	JAMES M. MICALI (57). Mr. Micali has been Chairman and President of Michelin North America, Inc. (tire manufacturer), Greenville, South Carolina, since 1996. In 2001, he became a member of Michelin Group’s Executive Council. Mr. Micali was Executive Vice President, Legal and Finance, of Michelin North America from 1990 to 1996 and prior to that was General Counsel and Secretary from 1985 to 1990. Mr. Micali is a director of Lafarge North America.		2003

9

      Members of the Board of Directors whose terms of office will continue until the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2007 are:

	Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five
	Years and Directorships in Public Corporations	Director Since
	*FITZ L. H. COKER (69). Mr. Coker is retired. He was President and a director of Sea Corporation of Myrtle Beach, Inc. (private investments), Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, from 1983 to 1989. At the time of his retirement from the Company in 1979, Mr. Coker had been Senior Vice President since 1976.		1964
	CALEB C. FORT (43). Mr. Fort has been Co-Chairman of The Merit Group, Inc. (distributors of residential and commercial paint-related products and various industrial supplies), Spartanburg, South Carolina, since 1998. He was a principal of Lancaster Distributing Company (distributors to the paint and wall covering industry), Spartanburg, South Carolina, from 1990 to 1998.		2001
	BERNARD L. M. KASRIEL (58). Mr. Kasriel has been Chief Executive Officer of Lafarge (construction materials group), Paris, France, since 2003. He was Vice-Chairman and Chief Operating Officer from 1995 to 2003 and was Managing Director of Lafarge Coppee from 1989 to 1995, Senior Executive Vice President from 1987 to 1989 and Executive Vice President from 1982 to 1987. Mr. Kasriel is a director of Lafarge, Lafarge North America and L’Oreal.		1995

*  C. W. Coker and F. L. H. Coker are brothers and are first cousins of J. L. Coker.

10

	Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five
	Years and Directorships in Public Corporations	Director Since
	JOHN H. MULLIN, III (63). Mr. Mullin has been Chairman of Ridgeway Farm LLC (privately held timber and farming business), Brookneal, Virginia, since 1989. He was associated with Dillon, Read & Co. Inc. (investment banking firm), New York, New York, from 1969 to 1989, last serving as Managing Director. Mr. Mullin is a director of The Liberty Corporation; Progress Energy, Inc. and its subsidiary companies, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. and Florida Progress Corporation; and is a trustee of The Putnam Funds.		2002
	THOMAS E. WHIDDON (52). Until his retirement in March 2003, Mr. Whiddon had been Executive Vice President – Logistics and Technology of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (home improvement retailer), Mooresville, North Carolina, since 2000. He was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Lowe’s from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Whiddon was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Zale Corporation (jewelers), Dallas, Texas, from 1995 to 1996 and was Senior Vice President and Treasurer from 1994 to 1995. He was Vice President and Treasurer of Eckerd Corporation (drugstores), Largo, Florida, from 1989 to 1994. Mr. Whiddon is a director of Carter’s Inc. and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.		2001

11

      Charles W. Coker was elected in 2003 to serve a three year term expiring in 2006. However, Mr. Coker will be 72 in May 2005 and, pursuant to our bylaws, a director’s term automatically terminates on his 72nd birthday. Accordingly, Mr. Coker’s term will end in May of 2005. Information about Mr. Coker is set forth below.

	Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five
	Years and Directorships in Public Corporations	Director Since
	*CHARLES W. COKER (71). Mr. Coker has been Chairman of the Company since 1990. He also was Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1990 to 1998. Mr. Coker was President from 1970 to 1990 and was reappointed President in 1994, serving until 1996, while maintaining the title and responsibility of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Coker is a director of Bank of America Corporation; Progress Energy, Inc. and its subsidiary companies, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. and Florida Progress Corporation; and Sara Lee Corporation.		1962

*  C. W. Coker and F. L. H. Coker are brothers and are first cousins of J. L. Coker.

12

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE POLICIES

      Our listing agreement with the New York Stock Exchange requires that at least a majority of the members of our Board of Directors be independent. Under the Exchange’s standards, “independent” means that a director has been determined by the Board to have no material relationship with Sonoco (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Sonoco). To assist us in making these determinations we have adopted the following guidelines.

      A director will not be considered independent if:

•  The director is, or in the past three years has been, an employee of Sonoco, or has an immediate family member who is, or in the past three years has been, an executive officer of Sonoco;

•  The director is, or in the past three years has been, affiliated with or employed by, or has an immediate family member who is, or in the past three years has been, affiliated with or employed in a professional capacity by, a present or former auditor of Sonoco;

•  The director is, or in the past three years has been, an executive officer, or has an immediate family member who is, or in the past three years has been, an executive officer of another company where any of Sonoco’s present executives serves on that company’s compensation committee;

•  The director is, or in the past three years has been, an executive officer or an employee, or has an immediate family member who is, or in the past three years has been, an executive officer of another company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, Sonoco for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues; or

•  The director or an immediate family member (other than an immediate family member who is a non-executive employee) receives, or in the past three years has received, more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation from Sonoco (other than director fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service that is not contingent in any way on continued service).

      The following relationships will not be considered to be material relationships that would impair a director’s independence:

•  Being an executive officer or an employee, or having an immediate family member who is an executive officer of another company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, Sonoco for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, is less than the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

      Based on the criteria above and the New York Stock Exchange’s independence standards, the Board of Directors has determined that the following directors, who constitute a majority of the Board, are independent:

C. J. Bradshaw, R. J. Brown, J. L. Coker, C. C. Fort, P. Fulton, B. L. M. Kasriel, E. H. Lawton, III, P. S. Lewis, J. E. Linville, H. L. McColl, Jr., J. M. Micali, J. H. Mullin, III, and T. E. Whiddon.

13

      All of the members of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Executive Compensation Committee have also been determined to be independent under the preceding criteria.

MEETINGS OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

      Our non-management directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present. The presiding director for each meeting is elected by those directors in attendance at that meeting. Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the non-management directors by writing to Non-Management Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Sonoco Products Company, 1 North Second Street, Hartsville, SC 29550 USA.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES AND

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

      We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors, officers and employees. Copies of these governance guidelines and the Code of Business Conduct are available through our Web site at www.sonoco.com. Print versions are available to our shareholders on request.

14

BOARD COMMITTEES

      During 2004, the Board of Directors held four regularly scheduled meetings and three special meetings to review significant developments affecting the Company and to act on matters requiring the Board of Directors’ approval. To assist it in performing its duties, the Board of Directors has established the six committees discussed below.

      All committees operate pursuant to written charters. The charters are available to shareholders through the Investor Relations page of our Web site at www.sonoco.com. These charters are also available in print to any shareholder who requests them. Each member of the Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Executive Compensation committees has been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards as adopted in November 2004.

			Number of
Committee			2004
Name	Purpose	Members	Meetings
Audit Committee (established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)	•  At least annually, appoint or replace the independent auditor and oversee the work of such independent auditor who shall report directly to the committee; •  Pre-approve all auditing services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditor; •  Evaluate the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent auditor; •  Review and concur in the appointment, reassignment or dismissal of the director of internal audit. Also review the internal audit department annual budget, staffing and audit plan; •  Review compliance with major accounting and financial policies of the Company; •  Review management’s assessment of the adequacy of internal controls; •  Review significant findings of the independent auditor and the internal audit department together with management’s responses;	T. E. Whiddon –   Chair C. J. Bradshaw R. J. Brown J. L. Coker Paul Fulton E. H. Lawton, III P. S. Lewis		10

15

Committee
Name	Purpose
Audit Committee (continued)	•  Review with the independent auditor any problems or difficulties together with management’s responses. Consider any reports or communications to the Committee from the auditor; •  Review the results of the annual external audit with the independent auditor; •  Discuss the annual and quarterly financial statements and all disclosures thereto with the auditor, management and the director of internal audit, including major issues regarding accounting principles, analyses of alternative GAAP treatments, the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, and the type and presentation of information to be included in earnings press releases; •  Discuss CEO and CFO certifications regarding filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); •  Discuss guidelines and policies by which management assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to risk. Evaluate the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; •  Recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept the audited financial statements; •  Establish procedures for (1) receipt and treatment of complaints about accounting, internal controls or auditing matters; and (2) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting matters; and •  Review monitoring of compliance with the Company’s code of business conduct.

16

			Number of
Committee			2004
Name	Purpose	Members	Meetings
Executive Compensation Committee	•  Establish the Company’s general compensation philosophy and oversee the development and implementation of compensation programs; •  Review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO, evaluate the performance of the CEO in light of those goals and establish the CEO’s compensation based on this evaluation and other factors; •  Review and approve the executive officer compensation programs; •  Evaluate and administer the Company’s incentive plans; •  Working with management, oversee regulatory compliance on compensation matters; and •  Review management development and succession plans.	H. L. McColl, Jr. –   Chair C. J. Bradshaw Paul Fulton B. L. M. Kasriel J. H. Mullin, III		3
Employee and Public Responsibility Committee	•  Oversee the Company’s commitment to employee health and safety; •  Provide oversight on diversity strategy, goals and progress; •  Review charitable giving policies and practices; •  Review employee morale through survey results or other means; •  Oversee the Company’s stance, response and programs related to the environment and to other emerging issues; •  Monitor major litigation and disputes and provide guidance in responding to such issues; •  Review actions taken by management relating to current or emerging public policy issues or significant political and social changes that may affect the Company; and •  Oversee the Company’s commitment to ethical business practices.	J. M. Micali –   Chair R. J. Brown F. L. H. Coker J. L. Coker C. C. Fort E. H. Lawton, III P. S. Lewis		2

17

			Number of
Committee			2004
Name	Purpose	Members	Meetings
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee	•  Recommend to the Board of Directors amendments to the bylaws; •  Develop and recommend to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance guidelines and review those guidelines at least annually. These recommendations shall include the structure, mission, practices and policies of the Board of Directors and the composition, structure and mission of Board committees; •  Identify individuals believed to be qualified to become Board members and recommend them as needed for election by the Board of Directors to fill vacancies or by the shareholders; •  Review with the Board of Directors, on an annual basis, the skills and characteristics of the then current Board members; •  Recommend to the Board of Directors the directors to serve on each of the Board’s committees; •  Ensure that processes are in place for annual CEO performance and compensation appraisal and for reviews of succession planning and management development; •  Recommend to the Board of Directors a corporate philosophy and strategy governing director compensation and benefits; and •  Oversee the evaluation of the Board of Directors and of management.	Paul Fulton –   Chair C. C. Fort B. L. M. Kasriel H. L. McColl, Jr. J. H. Mullin, III T. E. Whiddon		4

      As shown above, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommends to the Board of Directors nominees to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors as they occur and recommends candidates for election as directors at Annual Meetings of Shareholders. Such candidates are routinely identified through personal and business relationships and contacts of the directors and executive officers.

      In recommending candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates such factors as it deems appropriate based on the Company’s current needs. These factors may include diversity, age, skills such as understanding of appropriate technologies and general finance, decision-making ability, interpersonal skills, experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size, and the

18

inter-relationship between the candidate’s experience and business background and other Board members’ experience and business background. Additionally, candidates for director should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, and they should be committed to the long-term interests of the shareholders.

      The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders if the shareholders comply with the following requirements. If you wish to recommend a director candidate to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for consideration as a Board of Directors’ nominee, you must submit in writing to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee your recommended candidate’s name, a brief resume setting forth the recommended candidate’s business and educational background and qualifications for service, and a notarized consent signed by the recommended candidate stating the recommended candidate’s willingness to be nominated and to serve. This information must be delivered to the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee at the Company’s address and must be received no later than January 5 in any year to be considered by the Committee as a potential Board of Directors’ nominee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may request further information if it determines a potential candidate may be an appropriate nominee. Director candidates recommended by shareholders that comply with these requirements will receive the same consideration that the Committee’s other candidates receive.

      Director candidates recommended by shareholders will not be considered by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for election at an annual meeting unless the shareholder recommendations are received no later than January 5 of the year of the meeting. In addition to making such recommendations, shareholders have the right to nominate candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting if they make a written nomination at least 60 days prior to the meeting. Any such nomination should be submitted to the Company’s address. No such nominations have been made for this Annual Meeting.

19

			Number of
Committee			2004
Name	Purpose	Members	Meetings
Financial Policy Committee	•  Review the Company’s annual operating and long-range plans for purposes of understanding changes to the Company’s capital structure and projected sources and uses of cash; •  Review as needed any significant financings by the Company; •  Review the Company’s financial risk management policies, practices and exposures; •  Evaluate the Company’s dividend policy; •  Review the funding and investment management of the Company’s defined benefit and postretirement benefit plans; and •  Review the Company’s key financial leverage ratios and ratings implications.	J. H. Mullin, III –   Chair J. L. Coker Paul Fulton J. M. Micali H. L. McColl, Jr.		5
Executive Committee	•  Empowered to exercise all of the authority of the Board of Directors between regularly scheduled meetings, except as limited by South Carolina law.	C. W. Coker H. E. DeLoach, Jr. H. L. McColl, Jr. J. H. Mullin, III		1

      During 2004, all directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of which they were members, except Mr. Brown and Mr. McColl.

      The Company encourages, but does not require, its directors to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In 2004, thirteen of fourteen directors attended the Annual Meeting.

20

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION

      Employee directors do not receive any additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. Non-employee directors were paid a $12,500 quarterly retainer and a fee of $1,500 for each Board of Directors and committee meeting attended. Committee chairpersons received an additional $500 per committee meeting. Effective July 1, 2004, the Audit Committee Chairperson began receiving a committee chair retainer of $1,250 per quarter.

      Directors may elect annually to defer part or all of their retainer and meeting fees. Directors can choose to have their deferrals earn interest credits at a market rate (the Merrill Lynch Ten-Year High Quality Bond Index) or be treated as if invested in equivalent units of Sonoco Common Stock (which are credited with reinvested dividend equivalents). Alternatively, directors can elect to receive stock options under the 1996 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”) instead of receiving any part of their cash compensation. If a director chooses this alternative, he or she will receive an option to purchase four dollars worth of Common Stock at the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted for each one dollar of cash compensation the director chooses not to receive. During 2004, two directors received the following number of stock options instead of cash compensation: E. H. Lawton, III — 8,379 shares and R. J. Brown — 2,378 shares.

      Under the Directors’ Plan, at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors during a calendar year, each non-employee director is granted an option to purchase 4,000 shares of Common Stock at a price equal to the fair market value as of the date the options are granted. Any person who later becomes a non-employee director also receives an option to purchase shares of Common Stock at the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted. The number of shares for which options are granted is reduced 25% for each full quarter of the calendar year during which the person did not serve as a non-employee director. During 2004, each non-employee director, except for Dr. Lewis and Mr. Linville, received an option covering 4,000 shares. Dr. Lewis joined the Board on July 28, 2004 and received an option covering 2,000 shares. Mr. Linville joined the Board on October 18, 2004 and received an option covering 1,000 shares. Effective with the first Board of Directors’ meeting in 2005, the annual non-employee director’s stock option grant was increased to 5,000 shares in accordance with the terms of this plan. Option shares are immediately vested but may not be exercised until one year after the grant date.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

      Members of the Executive Compensation Committee during the year ended December 31, 2004 were:

C. J. Bradshaw, Paul Fulton, B. L. M. Kasriel, H. L. McColl, Jr. and J. H. Mullin, III

      Mr. Fulton is a director of Bank of America Corporation. During the third quarter of 2004, a Bank of America subsidiary managed the syndication and participated as agent to provide a five-year committed revolving line of credit for $350,000,000 to support our commercial paper program and for general corporate purposes. Bank of America’s commitment to this facility is $36,000,000. A committed line of credit from Bank of America has been in place since 1987 and has been renewed, amended and increased

21

or decreased according to our needs. Bank of America has extended other lines of credit to us as support for letters of credit, overdrafts and other corporate needs. It also provides treasury management services to us. We pay fees to the bank for these services and for the availability of the lines of credit, as well as interest on any borrowed funds.

      All transactions were handled on a competitive basis. Management believes that the rates and provisions were as favorable to us as we could have obtained from similar sources.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

      Mr. C. W. Coker and Mr. Paul Fulton are directors of Bank of America Corporation. See “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” for information about our transactions with Bank of America.

      Mr. R. J. Brown is a director of Wachovia Corporation. Wachovia Bank, N.A., a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation, committed $36,000,000 to the revolving line of credit syndicated by Bank of America to support our commercial paper program and for general corporate purposes. Wachovia Bank, N.A. also provides other lines of credit to support stand-by letters of credit, and it provides trustee services. We pay fees to Wachovia Bank, N.A. for the availability of the credit lines and for the trustee services, as well as interest on any borrowed funds.

      Our management believes the prices and terms of the transactions reported above were comparable to those we could have obtained from other sources. We anticipate engaging in similar business transactions in 2005. The Board of Directors considered these relationships when making its determinations of independence.

      Mr. C. W. Coker was paid a bonus of $350,000 in 2005 for services provided to the Company in 2004 as calculated under his approved 2004 incentive formula.

      In light of Mr. Coker’s pending retirement as a director and his expected continued availability for consulting, at its February 2005 meeting the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors agreed to provide Mr. Coker with ongoing secretarial assistance and use of an office as well as use of the corporate aircraft for up to 50 hours a year for five years. In return, Mr. Coker will reimburse the Company for the variable operating costs related to his personal usage of the aircraft.

      During 2004 the Company employed family members of two directors of the Company. Those whose compensation exceeded $60,000 were Charles W. Coker, Jr., Division VP/General Manager of the Protective Packaging Division, Thomas L. Coker, Division VP/General Manager of the Flexible Packaging Division, and Robert H. Coker, Division VP/Sales & Marketing of the Rigid Paper and Plastics Division, sons of Charles W. Coker, Chairman of the Board. Their earnings for 2004 were $288 thousand, $235 thousand and $231 thousand, respectively. John W. DeLoach, Plant Manager in the Recovered Paper Division and Harris E. DeLoach, III, also Plant Manager in the Recovered Paper Division, sons of Harris E. DeLoach, Jr., President and CEO, had earnings for 2004 of $71 thousand and of $64 thousand, respectively. Each of these employees also received the usual employee benefits available to all employees at their levels.

22

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

      The following table shows information as of December 31, 2004, about persons known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Shares. This information was obtained from a Schedule 13G filed by the entity named below with the SEC, and we have not independently verified it.

		Amount of
		Beneficial		Percent
Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Ownership		of Class
No Par Value Common	Deutsche Bank AG (1)		5,853,503		5.97%
	Taunusanlage 12, D60325 Frankfurt am Main Federal Republic of Germany

(1)  Deutsche Bank AG is a parent holding company that has subsidiaries which act as investment advisors to manage discretionary investment accounts on behalf of their clients.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

      Our directors and executive officers are required to file reports with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, showing the number of shares of any class of our equity securities they owned when they became a director or executive officer, and, after that, any changes in their ownership of our securities. These reports are required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

      Based on a review of Section 16(a) reports and any written representations made to us, it appears that all such filings for 2004 were made in a timely manner.

23

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

      The following table shows the number of shares beneficially owned as of February 18, 2005, directly or indirectly, by each director and by each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table.

									Deferred
	Total Number			Percent			Restricted		Compensation
	of Shares			of			Stock		and Restoration
Name and Position	Owned(1)			Class(2)			Rights(7)		Units(8)
C. J. Bradshaw Director		52,630	(3)		–			–		4,733
R. J. Brown Director		37,793			–			–		5,893
C. W. Coker Chairman and Director		1,913,426			1.9	%		125,284		14,143
F. L. H. Coker Director		895,399			–			–		–
J. L. Coker Director		120,500			–			–		–
C. C. Fort Director		314,476			–			–		–
Paul Fulton Director		37,623	(4)		–			–		–
B. L. M. Kasriel Director		46,373			–			–		3,226
E. H. Lawton, III Director		90,059			–			–		–
P. S. Lewis Director		–			–			–		–
J. E. Linville Director		754,215			–			–		–
H. L. McColl, Jr. Director		43,411	(5)		–			–		10,015
J. M. Micali Director		9,976			–			–		–
J. H. Mullin, III Director		20,000			–			–		2,997
T. E. Whiddon Director		20,000			–			–		–
H. E. DeLoach, Jr. President, Chief Executive Officer and Director		1,306,035	(6)		1.3	%		177,220		16,042
C. L. Sullivan, Jr. Senior Vice President		207,200			–			11,572		2,538
R. E. Holley Senior Vice President		306,489			–			15,660		5,796

24

								Deferred
	Total Number		Percent			Restricted		Compensation
	of Shares		of			Stock		and Restoration
Name and Position	Owned(1)		Class(2)			Rights(7)		Units(8)
J. C. Bowen Senior Vice President		219,026		–			13,974		3,543
C. J. Hupfer Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		198,510		–			7,318		2,542
All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (29 persons)		7,547,094		7.4	%		397,899		92,304

  (1)  The directors and the named executive officers have sole voting and investment power over the shares unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes. The number includes shares subject to currently exercisable options and options exercisable within 60 days granted by the Company under the 1991 Key Employee Stock Plan (the “1991 Plan”) and the Directors’ Plan for the following directors and named executive officers: C. J. Bradshaw — 26,600; R. J. Brown — 37,331; C. W. Coker — 802,500; F. L. H. Coker — 26,600; J. L. Coker — 23,600; C. C. Fort — 13,500; Paul Fulton — 26,600; B. L. M. Kasriel — 44,258; E. H. Lawton, III — 31,489; H. L. McColl, Jr. — 26,600; J. M. Micali — 6,000; J. H. Mullin, III — 10,000; T. E. Whiddon — 15,000; H. E. DeLoach, Jr. — 1,018,500; C. L. Sullivan, Jr. — 205,000; R. E. Holley — 252,200; J. C. Bowen — 214,000; and C. J. Hupfer — 195,000.

Also included are shares held in the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan (2,648) and shares held in the Company’s Savings Plan (34,452).

Shareholdings in this column do not include Restricted Stock Rights granted under the 1991 Plan, issuance of which has been deferred until retirement, or Deferred Compensation and Restoration Units. Please see the right-hand columns and footnotes 7 and 8 below.

(2)	Percentages not shown are less than 1%.
(3)	Includes 4,840 shares of Common Stock owned by Mrs. Bradshaw. Mr. Bradshaw disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
(4)	Includes 507 shares of Common Stock owned by Mrs. Fulton. Mr. Fulton disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
(5)	Includes 11,882 shares of Common Stock owned by Mrs. McColl. Mr. McColl disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
(6)	Includes 12,365 shares of Common Stock owned by Mrs. DeLoach. Mr. DeLoach disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Also includes 226,197 shares of Common Stock owned by trusts of which Mr. DeLoach is trustee. Mr. DeLoach has no pecuniary interest in these trusts and disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
(7)	Issuance of these shares, most of which have vested, has been deferred until retirement; thus, no present voting rights are associated with them.
(8)	These figures represent Deferred Compensation Units and Restoration Units connected with the Sonoco Savings Plan. No voting rights are associated with these units.

      On April 15, 2003, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution establishing stock ownership guidelines for outside directors. The guidelines establish a target level of ownership of Sonoco Products Company Common Stock based on years of service as a director from the date the guidelines were established. The guidelines are as follows: 3,000 shares, 5,000 shares and 8,000 shares after two, four and six years of service, respectively.

25

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

      The purpose of the Executive Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) is to discharge the responsibilities of the Board of Directors of Sonoco Products Company (the “Company”) relating to compensation of the Company’s executive officers by overseeing the administration of the Company’s executive officer compensation programs relating to salaries, incentives, benefits and perquisites, establishing the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and all other executive officers, and preparing any reports on executive compensation required by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Committee reviews top management succession and development plans. The basic duties and responsibilities of the Committee are outlined on page 17 of this proxy statement.

      The Committee consists entirely of independent directors who are not officers, employees or former employees of the Company. In accordance with its charter, the Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to advise the Committee on compensation matters related to the CEO and other executive officers. The Committee met three times during 2004, and has met one time in 2005, as of the printing of this report.

Philosophy

      The executive compensation program consists of base salary, annual cash bonus opportunities, and long-term incentives, which include stock options and performance contingent restricted stock units. The program has been designed to attract, motivate, reward and retain senior management by providing competitive total compensation opportunities based on performance, leadership, teamwork and the creation of shareholder value.

      In order to determine competitive compensation levels, the Company annually participates in a number of national surveys conducted by independent consulting firms. These surveys cover a large number of similar positions across American industry. Where possible, the Company matches its corporate officer positions to survey data for companies with sales in the $1 billion to $5 billion range. Likewise, division officer positions are matched to a comparable division revenue range. From these surveys, executive compensation levels for base salaries, total cash compensation (“TCC”), which consists of base salary plus annual target bonus, and total direct compensation (“TDC”), which is comprised of TCC plus long-term incentives, are developed. Periodically the Company contracts with independent consulting firms to perform customized compensation studies of companies in its industry group and/or of companies similar in size.

      Base salary midpoints are targeted to be at the median (50th percentile) of the surveyed market. To provide greater emphasis on the performance-based variable pay components of the program, incentive pay (consisting of annual cash bonuses, annual stock option awards, and performance contingent restricted stock units) is calibrated to provide a total compensation package at the 75th percentile of the survey data described above. Actual compensation at the 75th percentile will be achieved only if challenging goals and longer-term increases in shareholder value are achieved. The variable portion of the TDC program is

26

leveraged so that, if performance targets in these measures are not met, actual total compensation for individual executive officers will normally fall below the survey median for their positions.

      In further support of the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, executive perquisites are limited and provide a lower level of benefits than the market median. Some of the more common perquisites in industry that the Company does not make available to its executive officers include country club memberships, company cars or drivers, metropolitan city apartments, vacation retreats, executive dining services or reserved parking.

      In the past, the benefits program consisting of a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) and split-dollar life insurance has provided a benefit that was higher than the market median. This benefits program, in particular the split-dollar life insurance program, was designed to enhance retention of executives until normal retirement age, at a modest long-term net cost to the Company. Recent regulatory changes make this form of executive life insurance no longer viable or cost-effective. The Company has taken actions to convert the split-dollar agreements into permanent life insurance policies in order to meet its executive life insurance obligations for current officers, but the life insurance benefit for future officers has been significantly reduced and consists of term insurance in line with the industry median.

      To evaluate the competitiveness of the executive compensation program, each year at its April meeting the Committee reviews the total compensation package for each officer. This includes a summary sheet showing a history of base salary adjustments, bonus awards and total cash compensation for the last ten years (or term as an officer, if less), stock options outstanding and the option price, vested and unvested restricted stock units, projected annual pension at age 65, and the amount of executive life insurance coverage.

      The Committee has taken, and it intends to continue taking, steps necessary to assure the federal tax deductibility of compensation realized by senior executives. However, to the extent that such steps would not be practical or would not be consistent with the Committee’s compensation objectives, there is the possibility that future compensation in some circumstances may not meet tax deductibility requirements.

      The following sections of this report include a discussion of each element of the executive compensation program. In each section we, the Committee, are providing a description of the actions we have taken with regard to 2004 executive compensation and the rationale for those actions. More specifically we will discuss our decisions regarding the compensation of Mr. DeLoach for performing the duties of President and CEO of the Company. The tables, accompanying narrative and footnotes which follow this report reflect the decisions covered by the discussions below.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

      To emphasize the importance of linking executive and shareholder interest, in 2003 the Board of Directors adopted stock ownership guidelines for executive officers. The target level of ownership of Sonoco Products Company stock (or Common Stock equivalents) is established as a fixed number of shares. The target level for the CEO is 140,000 shares. The target for Senior Vice Presidents is 24,000 shares, and the target for other officers is 7,000 shares. Each employee subject to the guidelines is expected to achieve the ownership target within five years from the date on which the employee became

27

subject to the guidelines. Common stock held in the Sonoco Savings Plan, stock equivalents earned through non-qualified deferred compensation programs, time vesting restricted stock which vests within five years, and any other beneficially owned shares of common stock are included in determining compliance with the guidelines. Shares that executives have the right to acquire through the exercise of stock options are not included in the calculation of stock ownership for guideline purposes. As of the printing of this report, the CEO and all other officers met the above ownership guidelines.

Base Salary

      The Company’s salary ranges and market prices for all salaried positions, including the CEO and other executive officers, are based on the combination of (1) a structured job evaluation system (for internal and external relativity) and (2) a market pricing system which matches individual jobs to independent salary surveys (for external competitiveness). This process places a relative value on the duties and responsibilities of each position.

      Each year the Committee reviews the base salary of all senior executives, including Mr. DeLoach and the other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (the “NEO’s”), at its April meeting. The total amount of merit increases for the officer group as a whole takes into account survey data as to the projected salary movement for executive positions during the calendar year, the average wage increase being given to other classes of employees within the Company, and the current economic environment in which the Company is operating. Individual merit increase awards are based on each executive’s performance in his or her position during the past year, and the relationship of his or her current salary to market. The Committee used these criteria to determine salary adjustments for the CEO and for each of the executive officers in 2004.

      In 2004, the Committee awarded Mr. DeLoach a merit increase of 5.0% based on its evaluation of his performance and an upward movement of 3.6% in the competitive market price for his position. With this increase, his salary equated to 102% of the 2004 market price for his position.

      The four other NEO’s (Messrs. Sullivan, Holley, Bowen and Hupfer) were awarded merit increases ranging from 2.9% to 5.0%, and averaging 4.0%. As a group their salaries equate to 100% of the 2004 competitive market median.

      These awards compare to an average upward movement of 4.1% of salaries for the Company’s entire U.S.-based salaried population in 2004.

Annual Bonus Awards

      In 2002, the Board of Directors adopted and the shareholders approved The Performance Based Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers (the “Plan”). Under the terms of this Plan, a maximum of 2.75% of Income from Operations as defined in the Plan was established as an incentive pool fund for the CEO and the four named executive officers in the proxy. For 2004, this maximum bonus pool exceeded the amount of bonus awards made by the Committee to these participants. Actual awards made by the Committee are based on Company and individual performance (as described below) within the performance-based maximum.

28

      During 2004, the Company’s stock price appreciated by over 20% and total shareholder return was over 24%. These improvements were primarily due to decisive action that management took in prior years and in 2004 to reposition the Company to meet a significantly changed business environment of the last few years, to take advantage of improving economies in countries where the Company has business interests, and to meet the new challenges in the marketplace of today and tomorrow. As in prior years, the Company’s 2004 performance-based incentive opportunities were structured to reward growth of profitable sales, maximization of cash flow, increased productivity and reductions in cost, as well as finalizing strategic acquisitions or joint ventures. These are the factors the Committee feels have led to the significant increase in total shareholder return during 2004.

      Specifically, for 2004, financial performance goals were weighted from 80% to 90% of total bonus opportunity. For senior executives with corporate responsibility, 75% of the Plan’s financial goals were based on corporate earnings per share and the remainder on revenue growth. For executives with business unit responsibility, 25% of the bonus opportunity available for financial performance was based on business unit revenue growth, 56.25% on business unit profit, and 18.75% on corporate earnings per share.

      High impact personal performance objectives for 2004 were established for each officer and were weighted at 20% of salary (or 20% to 10% of total bonus opportunity).

      On February 1, 2005, the Committee reviewed and approved the 2004 annual bonus awards for executive officers. Mr. DeLoach’s bonus was based on predetermined targets in the financial measures cited above and the Committee’s assessment of his achievement in meeting his predetermined high-impact objectives.

      As shown under the “Bonus” caption in the Summary Compensation Table on page 33, Mr. DeLoach’s bonus increased by $1,080,268 (164%) over the prior year. Approximately 80% of this bonus increase reflected an approximate $50,000,000 increase in net income from continuing operations, excluding restructuring expense, for the Company. Approximately 20% of this bonus increase reflected a 10% increase in revenue (excluding divestitures and significant acquisitions). The amount of bonus awarded for completion of personal objectives was comparable for both years.

      For the other four NEO’s, bonus increases ranged from 160% to 193% over the prior year and reflect the same improved corporate financial performance as cited for Mr. DeLoach.

      Mr. C. W. Coker was paid a bonus of $350,000 in 2005 for services provided during 2004 as calculated under his approved incentive formula.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

      The Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) is designed to encourage and reward the creation of long-term value for shareholders.

      The Company’s LTIP is comprised of two components: non-qualified stock options (NQSO) and performance-contingent restricted stock units (RSU).

29

      In 2004, the Committee shifted the balance in the two components for the officer group. The total number of stock options available for grants to officers was reduced by 48%. This was offset by an increase in the number of performance contingent restricted stock units awarded. At target, this results in an overall mix in the officers’ LTIP of 25% NQSO and 75% RSU. The exchange ratio in making the shift was one RSU for five NQSO (1:5). This action is in keeping with trends in executive compensation and is generally viewed favorably by institutional and individual investors. Furthermore, the exchange ratio approved by the Committee is considered conservative in that many companies making this shift have used more aggressive exchange ratios of 1:4 or less.

      This change will emphasize the importance of Company performance in both total shareholder return and earnings per share growth. In addition, this shift will enhance the retention component in the Company’s officer compensation program, limit dilution and promote stock ownership.

      In the valuation of equity grants under the LTIP, the Committee uses the Binomial Option Pricing Model to value stock options, and uses the market value of Sonoco stock to value restricted stock units. The RSU calculations assume a constant stock price to avoid year to year, purely price related fluctuations, in the number of shares granted.

      To determine the target number of equity shares to be awarded to the officer group under the LTIP, the Committee looks at the TDC target for each officer position. The base salary median and the target annual bonus are subtracted to arrive at the target dollars available for the long-term component of the compensation plan. These dollars are then converted to shares of NQSO and RSU based on the 25%/ 75% mix described above.

Stock Options

      Under a plan previously approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Committee approved 2004 NQSO grants to 938 key employees, including Mr. DeLoach and the other executive officers. The price of these options was set at the closing market price on the date of grant. Accordingly these options will be valuable to the recipients only if the market price of the Company stock increases. Stock options for Mr. DeLoach and the other named officers are included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 33, under the caption “Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted” and in the Options Grants in Last Fiscal Year table on page 36. Mr. DeLoach’s target grant was calculated by the formula described above. The actual number of stock options granted to Mr. DeLoach and the other officers was based on the Committee’s assessment of their relative performance.

Performance Contingent Restricted Stock Units

      In 2004, the Committee approved RSU grants to 26 executives, including Mr. DeLoach and the other NEO’s under a shareholder approved stock plan. These are shown in the “Long-Term Incentive Plans – Awards in the Last Fiscal Year” table on page 34. The number of share units granted to each individual was based on their target shares as described previously and adjusted upward or downward from target based on the Committee’s judgment of the individual’s performance.

30

      The award to Mr. DeLoach reflects his leadership in achieving a significant improvement in financial performance for the Company in 2004, and successful completion of one major acquisition and a strategic joint venture.

      As described in detail on page 34, the number of these restricted share units that will vest is dependent on cumulative EPS and average return on net assets employed (RONAE) for the three-year performance period. To enhance the retention factor, the plan provides that if less than 50% of a participant’s target shares vest at the end of the three-year performance period, the remainder of that 50% of target shares will time vest after five years, subject to the participant’s continued employment for that period. Except for death, disability, or retirement other than for cause, termination of a participant’s employment prior to vesting will result in forfeiture of any award. Executives are expected to hold any shares that vest until retirement.

Perquisites

      As mentioned in the Committee’s “Philosophy” statement, perquisites for Corporate officers are very modest.

      Corporate officers are allowed an annual financial planning/tax assistance allowance of up to 2% of base salary or $5,000 (whichever is greater).

      Corporate officers may occasionally use the Company’s aircraft for personal travel. This use is valued at the “Aggregate Incremental Cost” to the Company, and was less than $30,000 in 2004 for the officer group as a whole.

      At its meeting in February 2005, the Committee took action in light of Mr. Charles W. Coker’s pending retirement as director in May 2005. In recognition of Mr. Coker’s over forty-seven years of service with the Company and his expected continued availability for consulting, the Committee agreed to provide him with the ongoing use of secretarial assistance and an office as well as the use of the corporate aircraft for up to 50 hours per year for five years. In turn, Mr. Coker will reimburse the Company for the variable operating costs related to this personal usage of the aircraft.

      H. L. McColl, Jr. (Chair)     C. J. Bradshaw     Paul Fulton

B. L. M. Kasriel J. H. Mullin, III

31

COMPARATIVE COMPANY PERFORMANCE

      The following line graph compares cumulative total shareholder return, assuming the reinvestment of dividends, for the Company with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index and a nationally recognized industry index, the Dow Jones U.S. Containers & Packaging Group (which includes the Company), from December 31, 1999, through December 31, 2004. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 1999, in Sonoco Products Company Common Stock, the S&P 500 Stock Index and the Dow Jones Containers & Packaging Group.

COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

AMONG SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY, THE S&P 500 INDEX

AND THE DOW JONES U.S. CONTAINERS & PACKAGING INDEX

	Cumulative Total Return
	12/99		12/00		12/01		12/02		12/03		12/04
Sonoco Products Company	$	100.00	$	98.92	$	125.63	$	111.98	$	125.03	$	155.77
S&P 500 Stock Index		100.00		90.89		80.09		62.39		80.29		89.02
Dow Jones U.S. Containers & Packaging Index		100.00		64.92		81.57		87.77		104.51		125.03

32

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

											Long-Term
											Compensation
											Awards(2)
											Number of
				Annual Compensation							Securities
											Underlying
									Other Annual		Options		All Other
Name and Principal Position		Year		Salary		Bonus			Compensation(1)		Granted		Compensation(3)
Harris E. DeLoach, Jr.			2004	$	874,802	$	1,740,856		$	66,550		73,000	$	251,690
	President and		2003		839,588		660,588			—		175,000		122,217
	Chief Executive Officer		2002		804,165		913,773			—		175,000		110,797
Charles L. Sullivan, Jr.			2004		416,669		616,670			37,851		25,000		103,632
	Senior Vice President		2003		398,750		235,701			—		45,000		31,799
			2002		373,335		258,326			—		40,000		27,214
Ronald E. Holley			2004		382,012		573,018			12,737		20,000		55,937
	Senior Vice President		2003		370,842		211,788			—		42,500		29,551
			2002		358,754		246,638			—		40,000		26,591
Jim C. Bowen			2004		350,831		526,247			27,797		15,000		66,395
	Senior Vice President		2003		338,750		179,910			—		40,000		26,651
			2002		319,585		251,182			—		35,000		22,898
Charles J. Hupfer			2004		350,923		491,292			8,891		24,000		45,217
	Vice President and		2003		316,004		188,939			—		40,000		24,427
	Chief Financial Officer		2002		252,368		251,358	(4)		—		37,000		23,963

(1)

The amounts in this column represent reimbursement during 2004 for the payment of taxes on Company-provided premiums/allocations to the Executive Bonus Life Insurance Plan that replaced the former post-1995 split-dollar life insurance arrangements and tax gross-up of reimbursements for financial planning services. None of the officers received perquisites or personal benefits which totaled the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of their respective salary plus bonus payments.

(2)

The number and dollar value of restricted stock rights held on December 31, 2004, including target contingent share units, and dividend equivalents, based on the closing stock price on December 31, 2004 of $29.65 per share were: Mr. DeLoach – 188,198 shares ($5,580,071); Mr. Sullivan – 25,122 shares ($744,867); Mr. Holley – 19,015 shares ($563,795); Mr. Bowen – 15,765 shares ($467,432); and Mr. Hupfer – 20,765 shares ($615,682).

33

(3)  All other compensation for 2004 consisted of the following components for each named officer:

			Company Contributions and
			Accruals to Defined
	Executive Life		Contribution		Deferred
Name	Insurance(a)		Retirement Plans(b)		Compensation(c)
H. E. DeLoach, Jr.	$	147,032	$	61,416	$	43,242
C. L. Sullivan, Jr.		77,537		26,095		—
R. E. Holley		32,185		23,752		—
J. C. Bowen		45,165		21,230		—
C. J. Hupfer		23,622		21,595		—

(a)	Includes Company contributions under the Company’s Executive Life Insurance program (that replaced certain split-dollar contracts canceled due to Sarbanes-Oxley Act restrictions) and the economic value of frozen split-dollar life insurance arrangements.
(b)	Comprised of contributions to the Sonoco Savings Plan and accruals to individual accounts in the Company’s Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan in order to keep employees whole with respect to Company contribution amounts that were limited by tax law.
(c)	Amounts in this column represent the above market portion of interest credits on previously-earned compensation for which payment has been deferred. Corresponding amounts for Mr. DeLoach in 2003 and 2002, which were included in “Other Annual Compensation” in those years, have been reclassified to “All Other Compensation”.

(4)  Includes a special one-time bonus of $25,000 that Mr. Hupfer received on April 25, 2002, upon his promotion to Chief Financial Officer

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS — AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

					Estimated Future Payouts under
	Maximum		Performance Period		Non-Stock-Price-Based Plans
	Number of		Until Maturation
Name	Share Units		or Payout		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)
H. E. DeLoach, Jr.		75,000		1/1/04-12/31/06		25,000		50,000		75,000
C. L. Sullivan, Jr.		20,625		1/1/04-12/31/06		6,875		13,750		20,625
R. E. Holley		17,250		1/1/04-12/31/06		5,750		11,500		17,250
J. C. Bowen		12,375		1/1/04-12/31/06		4,125		8,250		12,375
C. J. Hupfer		19,875		1/1/04-12/31/06		6,625		13,250		19,875

      Awards are made in the form of contingent Company share units. The vesting of awards is tied to growth in earnings (cumulative EPS) and improved capital effectiveness (average RONAE) over a three-year period as described in the Compensation Committee’s Report that begins on page 26. Both measures are exclusive of the impact of year-to-year change in pension expense (income), net of normal service cost measures. For two-thirds of the designated shares, threshold vesting is earned if three-year cumulative EPS is 95.57% of target, and maximum vesting is earned if three-year cumulative EPS is 110.26% or more of

34

target. For the remaining one-third of designated shares, three targets have been established for average RONAE, depending on the amount of capital the Company invests in acquisitions during the three-year performance period. For the RONAE targets, threshold vesting is earned if three-year average performance is from 94.44% to 95.00% of target, and maximum vesting is earned if three-year average performance is from 105.00% to 105.56% of target. For all measures, the target shares vest when performance is 100% of target. If less than 50% of the target number of stock units vest at the end of the three-year performance period, the remainder of that 50% of target stock units will vest after five years (December 31, 2008).

OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

					Number of Shares
					Underlying				Value of Unexercised
	Number of				Unexercised Options				In-the-Money Options
	Shares				as of 12/31/2004				as of 12/31/2004(2)
	Acquired on		Value
Name	Exercise		Realized(1)		Exercisable		Unexercisable		Exercisable(3)		Unexerciseable(4)
H. E. DeLoach, Jr.		–0–	$	–0–		865,500		73,000	$	5,340,449	$	422,670
C. L. Sullivan, Jr.		–0–		–0–		150,000		25,000		1,058,862		144,750
R. E. Holley		32,686		202,289		207,200		20,000		1,152,877		115,800
J. C. Bowen		13,975		90,855		180,000		15,000		999,110		86,850
C. J. Hupfer		13,513		95,621		146,000		24,000		742,752		138,960

(1)	The difference between the exercise price paid and the value of the acquired shares, based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the exercise date.
(2)	Based on the December 31, 2004 closing price of $29.65 per share.
(3)	Based on the exercise prices ranging from $19.19 to $28.93 per share.
(4)	Based on an exercise price of $23.86 per share.

35

OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

Individual Grants
	Number of		% of Total
	Securities		Options
	Underlying		Granted to		Exercise
	Options		Employees		Price		Expiration		Grant Date
Name	Granted(1)		in 2004		(per share)		Date		Present Value(2)
H. E. DeLoach, Jr.		73,000		7.1	$	23.86		02/04/2014	$	362,810
C. L. Sullivan, Jr.		25,000		2.4	$	23.86		02/04/2014		124,250
R. E. Holley		20,000		1.9	$	23.86		02/04/2014		99,400
J. C. Bowen		15,000		1.5	$	23.86		02/04/2014		74,550
C. J. Hupfer		24,000		2.3	$	23.86		02/04/2014		119,280

(1)

These options were granted on February 4, 2004. All options have exercise prices equal to the closing market prices on the dates of the grant. They became exercisable one year from the date of the grant and were granted for a period of ten years, subject to earlier expiration in certain events related to termination of employment. The exercise price can be paid by cash or by the delivery of previously owned shares. Tax obligations also can be paid by an offset of the underlying shares.

(2)

The Grant Date Present Values were derived using the Binomial Option Pricing Model in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not intended to forecast appreciation of the Company’s stock price. The options had a grant date present value of $4.97. The Binomial model was used with the following assumptions: term — 4.52 years; stock price volatility — 27.4%; dividend yield — 3.58% and discount rate — 3.19%.

36

PENSION PLAN TABLE

      Named executive officers participate in a non-contributory defined benefit supplemental executive retirement plan program which provides for a maximum annual lifetime retirement benefit equal to 60% of final average compensation computed as a straight life annuity, based on the highest three of the last seven calendar years. In order to receive the full benefit, the executive must have at least 15 years of service and retire no earlier than age 65. Eligible spouses (married one year or longer at the executive’s retirement date) receive survivor benefits at a rate of 75% of the benefit paid to the executives. The total benefit provided by the Company is offset by 100% of primary U.S. Social Security.

		Age 65 Retirement
		Years of Service
Final
Average						15 or
Compensation(1)		5		10		More(2)
$	300,000	$	60,000	$	120,000	$	180,000
	400,000		80,000		160,000		240,000
	500,000		100,000		200,000		300,000
	600,000		120,000		240,000		360,000
	700,000		140,000		280,000		420,000
	800,000		160,000		320,000		480,000
	900,000		180,000		360,000		540,000
	1,000,000		200,000		400,000		600,000
	1,100,000		220,000		440,000		660,000
	1,200,000		240,000		480,000		720,000
	1,300,000		260,000		520,000		780,000
	1,400,000		280,000		560,000		840,000
	1,500,000		300,000		600,000		900,000
	1,600,000		320,000		640,000		960,000
	1,700,000		340,000		680,000		1,020,000
	1,800,000		360,000		720,000		1,080,000
	1,900,000		380,000		760,000		1,140,000
	2,000,000		400,000		800,000		1,200,000
	2,100,000		420,000		840,000		1,260,000
	2,200,000		440,000		880,000		1,320,000
	2,300,000		460,000		920,000		1,380,000
	2,400,000		480,000		960,000		1,440,000
	2,500,000		500,000		1,000,000		1,500,000

(1)  Final average compensation includes salary and bonus. Age, years of service and final average compensation as of December 31, 2004 for the named officers are as follows:

			Years of		Final Average
Name	Age		Service		Compensation
H. E. DeLoach, Jr.		60		19	$	1,944,591
C. L. Sullivan, Jr.		61		4		766,484
R. E. Holley		62		40		714,351
J. C. Bowen		54		32		655,502
C. J. Hupfer		58		30		616,961

(2)  Years of service beyond fifteen do not provide for any additional benefit.

37

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

      The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management and our independent auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PricewaterhouseCoopers”) our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, (“Communication with Audit Committees”) and PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2, (“An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements”). The Committee has also reviewed the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers discussed below and has considered whether provision of such services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.

      During the year 2004, management completed the documentation, testing and evaluation of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting in response to the requirements set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations. The Audit Committee was kept apprised of the progress of the evaluation and provided oversight and advice to management during the process. In connection with this oversight, the Committee received periodic updates provided by management and PricewaterhouseCoopers at each regularly scheduled Committee meeting. At the conclusion of the process, management provided the Committee with a report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Committee also reviewed the report of management contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC, as well as PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K). This report related to its audit of (i) the consolidated financial statements, (ii) management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and (iii) the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Committee continues to oversee the Company’s efforts related to its internal control over financial reporting and management’s preparations for the evaluation in fiscal 2005.

      Based on the review and discussions referenced above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, for filing with the SEC.

T. E. Whiddon (Chair)  C. J. Bradshaw  R. J. Brown  J. L. Coker

Paul Fulton  E. H. Lawton, III  P. S. Lewis

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      PricewaterhouseCoopers served as the Company’s principal auditors for 2004. The Audit Committee has tentatively selected PricewaterhouseCoopers to serve as the Company’s principal auditors for 2005, pending agreement over the terms of their engagement.

      Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers will be present and available to answer appropriate questions at the Annual Meeting and may make a statement if they wish.

38

Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers

      The following table sets forth a summary of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers for professional services rendered in connection with the consolidated financial statements and reports for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for other services rendered during 2004 and 2003 on behalf of the Company and its subsidiaries:

Fee Category ($ in thousands)	2004		% of Total			2003		% of Total
Audit Fees	$	3,292		76.1	%	$	1,314		39.3	%
Audit-Related Fees		176		4.1			381		11.4
Tax Fees		857		19.8			1,432		42.9
All Other Fees		0		0.0			213		6.4
Total Fees	$	4,325		100.0	%	$	3,340		100.0	%

      Audit Fees: Audit fees include fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit Fees also include services provided to the Company in connection with its compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Approximately $903 thousand of the fiscal 2004 audit fees relate to Section 404 work.

      Audit-Related Fees: Audit-related fees include fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include employee benefit plan audits, due diligence and accounting consultations in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

      Tax Fees: Tax fees include fees for tax compliance/preparation and other tax services. Tax compliance/preparation includes fees billed for professional services related to federal, state and international tax compliance, assistance with tax audits and appeals, expatriate tax services, and assistance related to the impact of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures on tax return preparation. Other tax services include fees billed for ongoing assistance with tax consulting and planning.

      All Other Fees: All other fees include fees for all other services other than those reported above, primarily U.K. actuarial services. PricewaterhouseCoopers provided these services under a transition agreement until October, 2003; a new service provider has been performing these duties since then.

Audit Committee Pre-approval of Audit and Permissible Non-audit Services of Independent Auditors

      The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms of such services) provided by the independent auditors, subject to limited exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which are approved by the

39

Audit Committee prior to completion of the audit. The Committee Chairperson is empowered to pre-approve PricewaterhouseCoopers services between meetings, provided all such services are brought to the Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. General pre-approval of certain audit, audit-related and tax services is granted by the Committee at the first quarter Committee meeting. The Committee subsequently reviews fees paid. Specific pre-approval is required for all other services. These projects are reviewed quarterly and the status of all such services is reviewed with the Committee. During 2004, all audit and permitted non-audit services were pre-approved by the Committee.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

      The Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board on Executive Compensation and the Audit Committee Report and the Stock Price Performance Graph are not deemed filed with the SEC and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any prior or future filings made by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference.

      References to our Web site address throughout this proxy statement are for information purposes only and are not intended to incorporate our Web site by reference into this proxy statement.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT ANNUAL MEETING

      If you want to present a shareholder proposal to be voted on at our Annual Meeting in 2006, you must submit the proposal to the Secretary of the Company in writing by February 3, 2006. However, if you want us to include your shareholder proposal in our proxy materials for our Annual Meeting in 2006, you must be sure the Secretary of the Company receives your written proposal by November 17, 2005. All shareholder proposals must comply with the requirements of our bylaws. The proxy agents for the Company will use their discretionary authority to vote on any shareholder proposal that the Secretary of the Company does not receive by January 31, 2006.

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

      Any shareholder who wishes to send communications to any member of the Board of Directors should mail them addressed to the intended recipient by name or position in care of: Corporate Secretary, Sonoco Products Company, 1 North Second Street, Hartsville, SC 29550 USA. Upon receipt of any such communications, the Corporate Secretary will determine the identity of the intended recipient and whether the communication is an appropriate shareholder communication. The Corporate Secretary will send all appropriate shareholder communications to the intended recipient. An “appropriate shareholder communication” is a communication from a person claiming to be a shareholder in the communication the subject of which relates solely to the sender’s interest as a shareholder and not to any other personal or business interest.

      In the case of communications addressed to the Board of Directors, the Corporate Secretary will send appropriate shareholder communications to the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance and Nominating

40

Committee. In the case of communications addressed to the independent or non-management directors, the Corporate Secretary will send appropriate shareholder communications to the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In the case of communications addressed to committees of the Board, the Corporate Secretary will send appropriate shareholder communications to the Chairperson of such committee.

      The Corporate Secretary is required to maintain a record of all communications received that were addressed to one or more directors, including those determined not to be appropriate shareholder communications. Such record will include the name of the addressee, the disposition by the Corporate Secretary and, in the case of communications determined not to be appropriate, a brief description of the nature of the communication. The Corporate Secretary is required to provide a copy of any additions to the record to the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee quarterly.

DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO SHAREHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS

      We have begun delivering a single copy of the Annual Report to multiple shareholders sharing one address unless we received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders at such address. Upon oral or written request to EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. (“EquiServe”), Post Office Box 43010, Providence, RI 02940-3010, (800)633-4236, EquiServe will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Annual Report to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy was delivered. If you are currently receiving a single copy of the Annual Report for multiple shareholders at your address and would prefer to receive separate copies in the future, please write or call EquiServe at the address or telephone number above and ask them to send you separate copies. If you are still currently receiving multiple copies of the Annual Report for multiple shareholders at your address and would prefer to receive a single copy in the future, please write or call EquiServe at the address or telephone number above and ask them to send a single copy to your address.

ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS

      Sonoco’s Annual Report and Proxy Statement can be accessed via the Internet at www.sonoco.com/annualreportandproxystatement. As a shareholder of record, you can elect to receive future Annual Reports and Proxy Statements, as well as quarterly financial and other shareholder information, electronically. Instructions are provided on the voting site if you vote via the Internet. Instructions also are provided if you electronically access your shareholder account and you are not already receiving your Annual Meeting materials electronically. If you select electronic receipt, you will be notified via email by Equiserve, our transfer agent, as to when the information will be available for your access. Your election to receive information electronically will remain in effect until you notify Equiserve in writing or by telephone that you wish to resume paper delivery by mail of these materials. If you own Sonoco shares through a broker or a bank, please contact that institution regarding instructions about receiving Annual Meeting materials and other financial information electronically.

41

OTHER MATTERS

      As of the date of this statement, management knows of no business that will be presented for consideration at the meeting other than that stated in the notice of the meeting. The proxy agents will vote in their best judgment on any other business that properly comes before the meeting.

      To assure your representation at the meeting, please vote by telephone (if you live in the United States or Canada), via the Internet or mark, sign, date and return your proxy card as promptly as possible. Please sign exactly as your name appears on the accompanying proxy.

Charles J. Hupfer

Secretary

March 16, 2005

42

3724-PS-05

DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL

P R O X Y

This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY

1 NORTH SECOND STREET - HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 - USA

The undersigned hereby appoints Charles J. Hupfer, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, or Vicki B. Arthur, Staff Vice President and Treasurer, as proxy agent, each with the power to appoint his/her substitute, and hereby authorizes him/her to represent and to vote, as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Sonoco Products Company held of record by the undersigned on February 18, 2005, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 20, 2005, or at any adjournment thereof.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.

This card also constitutes voting instructions to the plan Trustee for shares of Sonoco Products Company held in the Sonoco Products Company Savings Plan. You may direct the Trustee how to vote your shares as indicated on this card. If you fail to give voting instructions to the Trustee, your shares will be voted by the Trustee in the same proportion as the shares for which valid instructions have been received.

PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN ON REVERSE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give your full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by an authorized person.

HAS YOUR ADDRESS CHANGED? DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS?

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY

c/o EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.

P.O. Box 8694

Edison, NJ 08818-8694

Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.

	Vote-by-Internet	OR		Vote-by-Telephone
1.	Log on to the Internet and go to http://www.eproxyvote.com/son		1.	Call toll-free 1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683)
2.	Follow the easy steps outlined on the secured internet site.		2.	Follow the easy recorded instructions.
If you vote over the internet or by telephone, please do not mail your card.

DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL

x Please mark votes       as in this example.
SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY
	1.	Election of Directors:
Mark box at right if comments or an address change has    o been noted on the reverse side of this card.		Nominees - Three-Year Term:   (01) C.J. Bradshaw,   (02) R.J. Brown,   (03) J.L. Coker,   (04) Paul Fulton
Please be sure to sign and date this Proxy.		Nominees - One-Year Term:   (05) P.S. Lewis   (06) J.E. Linville

	FOR ALL NOMINEES o	WITHHOLD FROM ALL NOMINEES o
FOR    ALL EXCEPT   o
	INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write the nominee’s name(s) in the space provided above.

2. In their discretion the proxy agents are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Signature:  Date:  Signature:  Date: