-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, IxFjZNqWxqHda4plvRw7XjFnRb/QoTb7z9MW+hId62SQLT9m+nmNlI75YImN+tIJ gcYI79sb2GSJbxwMOk9VTg== 0000899733-04-000111.txt : 20041104 0000899733-04-000111.hdr.sgml : 20041104 20041104155808 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000899733-04-000111 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 7 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20040925 FILED AS OF DATE: 20041104 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20041104 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: WILD OATS MARKETS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000909990 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: RETAIL-CONVENIENCE STORES [5412] IRS NUMBER: 841100630 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-21577 FILM NUMBER: 041119738 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3375 MITCHELL LANE CITY: BOULDER STATE: CO ZIP: 80301 BUSINESS PHONE: 3034405220 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1645 BROADWAY CITY: BOULDER STATE: CO ZIP: 80302 10-Q 1 form10q092504.htm FORM 10-Q, 09-25-04 Form 10-Q, 09/25/04

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(X)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR SECTION 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 25, 2004
OR

( )

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR SECTION 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
__________ TO __________

 

 

 

Commission file number 0-21577

 

 

WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

84-1100630

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Incorporation or organization)

 

 

 

 

 

3375 Mitchell Lane

Boulder, Colorado 80301

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 

 

 

(303) 440-5220

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

  Yes       ( X )       No      ( )

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2):

  Yes       ( X )       No      ( )

 

As of November 1, 2004, there were 28,484,901 shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock (par value $.001 per share).

 

 1


 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets, September 25, 2004 (unaudited)
and December 27, 2003

Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited),
Three and Nine Months Ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income (unaudited),
Three and Nine Months Ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited),
Nine Months Ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures
PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Item 2.

Changes in Securities

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 5.

Other Information

Item 6.

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

SIGNATURE AND EXHIBITS

Signatures

 

2


PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements

 

 

WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)

September 25,

December 27,

2004

2003



(unaudited)

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents

$ 28,068 

$ 17,400 

Short term investments

26,299 

-      

Inventories, net of reserves

53,059 

46,621 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful    accounts

2,701 

4,038 

Income tax receivable

81 

261 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

1,202 

2,192 

Deferred tax asset

8,106 

6,340 



Total current assets

119,516 

76,852 

Property and equipment, net

151,659 

130,989 

Goodwill, net

106,084 

106,404 

Other intangible assets, net

6,692 

6,976 

Deposits and other assets

6,341 

2,932 

Deferred tax asset

12,608 

12,438 



$ 402,900 

$ 336,591 



LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable

$ 55,835 

$ 47,529 

Book overdraft

21,534 

26,727 

Accrued liabilities

45,731 

42,998 

Current portion of capital leases

27 

14 



Total current liabilities

123,127 

117,268 

Long-term debt and capital leases

115,190 

30,179 

Other long-term obligations

13,674 

14,058 

Total liabilities

251,991 

161,505 

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares    authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

-      

-      

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 60,000,000 shares    authorized, 30,462,534 and 30,063,421 shares    issued, respectively

30 

30 

Treasury stock, at cost: 1,977,800 shares as of

   September 25, 2004

(24,999)

-      

Additional paid-in capital

221,878 

217,400 

Note receivable, related party

(11,262)

(10,815)

Accumulated deficit

(35,122)

(31,777)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

384 

248 



Total stockholders’ equity

150,909 

175,086 



$ 402,900 

$ 336,591 



 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

3


 

WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per-share data) (unaudited)

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED

NINE MONTHS ENDED



Sept 25,
2004

Sept 27,
2003

Sept 25,
2004

Sept 27,
2003





Sales

$ 250,739 

$ 237,028 

$ 766,231 

$ 715,263 

Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs

181,864 

168,158 

547,070 

504,312 





Gross profit

68,875 

68,870 

219,161 

210,951 

Operating expenses:
Direct store expenses

57,898 

53,114 

171,212 

154,305 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

15,517 

15,472 

45,456 

48,246 

Loss on disposal of assets

192 

661 

170 

2,029 

Pre-opening expenses

1,399 

616 

3,500 

1,639 

Restructuring and asset impairment charges (income), net

2,124 

134 

2,289 

(1,747)





(Loss) income from operations

(8,255)

(1,127)

(3,466)

6,479 





Loss on early extinguishment of debt

-     

-     

-     

(186)

Interest income

370 

199 

778 

554 

Interest expense

(1,179)

(484)

(1,986)

(2,319)





(Loss) income before income taxes

(9,064)

(1,412)

(4,674)

4,528 

Income tax (benefit) expense

(2,999)

(551)

(1,329)

1,766 





Net (loss) income

$ (6,065)

$ (861)

$ (3,345)

$ 2,762 





Net (loss) income per common share:
Basic

$ (0.21)

$ (0.03)

$ (0.11)

$ 0.09 

Diluted

$ (0.21)

$ (0.03)

$ (0.11)

$ 0.09 

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic

28,458 

29,898 

29,480 

29,792 

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units

-      

-      

-      

377 





Weighted average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution

28,458 

29,898 

29,480 

30,169 





 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

4


 

WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income

(in thousands) (unaudited)

THREE MONTHS ENDED

NINE MONTHS ENDED



Sept 25,

Sept 27,

Sept 25,

Sept 27,

2004

2003

2004

2003





Net (loss) income

$ (6,065)

$ (861)

$ (3,345)

$ 2,762 

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments    arising during the period

346 

80 

127 

568 

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale    securities, net of tax of $5 and $5,    respectively

-     

-     

Recognition of hedge results to interest    expense during the period, net of tax of    $51and $367, respectively

-     

85 

-     

613 

Change in market value of cash flow    hedge during the period, net of tax of    $12

-     

-     

-     

(20)





Other comprehensive income

353 

165 

134 

1,161 





Comprehensive (loss) income

$ (5,712)

$ (696)

$ (3,211)

$ 3,923 





 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

 

5


WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands) (unaudited)

NINE MONTHS ENDED


Sept 25,

Sept 27,

2004

2003



CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss) income

$ (3,345)

$ 2,762 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating    activities:
Depreciation and amortization

18,745 

16,764 

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

170 

2,029 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense

(1,927)

1,396 

Non-cash restructuring and asset impairment expense (income), net

2,251 

(1,747)

Income tax benefit of employee stock option exercises

445 

239 

Other

(447)

79 

Change in assets and liabilities:
Inventories, net

(6,630)

1,500 

Receivables, net, and other assets

3,308 

533 

Accounts payable

10,930 

5,698 

Accrued liabilities

1,068 

(3,051)



Net cash provided by operating activities

24,568 

26,202 



CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures

(42,980)

(22,070)

Purchase of short term investments

(26,287)

-     

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

988 

326 



Net cash used in investing activities

(68,279)

(21,744)



CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net repayments under line-of-credit agreement

(30,179)

(6,700)

Net decrease in book overdraft

(5,215)

(489)

Repayments on long-term debt and capital leases

(50)

(37,102)

Proceeds from long term debt

115,150 

37,879 

Purchase of treasury stock

(24,999)

-     

Payment of debt issuance costs

(3,866)

(721)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net

3,370 

2,455 



Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

54,211 

(4,678)



Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

168 

64 



Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

10,668 

(156)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

17,400 

11,367 



Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 28,068 

$ 11,211 



SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING:
Equipment acquired through capital lease

$        105 


 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

6


WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

 

1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

 

Wild Oats Markets, Inc. ("Wild Oats" or the "Company"), headquartered in Boulder, Colorado, owns and operates natural and organic foods supermarkets in the United States and Canada. The Company also operates bakeries, commissary kitchens and a distribution center that supply the stores. The Company’s operations are concentrated in one market segment, grocery stores, and are geographically concentrated in the western and central parts of the United States.

 

The consolidated balance sheet as of September 25, 2004, the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income for the three months and nine months ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003, as well as the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003 have been prepared without an audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement thereof, have been made.

The financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC regulations, therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Examples include accounting for self-insurance reserves, restructuring charges and store closing costs, asset impairment charges, goodwill, inventory valuation, and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The results of operations for interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

 

Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

The unaudited information included in the consolidated financial statements for the three months and nine months ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003 include the results of operations of the Company for the 13 weeks and 39 weeks then ended.

 

 

2. Short-Term Investment Policy

 

 

The amortized cost of debt securities in this category is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity computed under the effective interest method. Such amortization is included in investment income. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in investment income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in investment income.

 

 

3. Stock-Based Compensation

 

At September 25, 2004, the Company had six stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 9 – Stock Plans and Options in our fiscal 2003 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the period ended December 27, 2003. These plans allow for awards of both stock options and restricted stock units ("RSUs"). The Company accounts for those plans in accordance with the intrinsic value based method in APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Some stock-based compensation expense is reflected in net income for options issued at a discount and for RSUs issued as Board of Directors’ compensation. All other options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant; therefore, no stock-based compensation expense is reflected in net income for these grants. Also reflected in results of operations for the fiscal years to date ended September 25, 2003, and September 27, 2004, respectively, is compensation expense of $315,000 and $182,000, respectively, relating to the extension of the option exercise period beyond Company-imposed blackout periods for previously granted stock options held by retiring members of the Board of Directors.

 

7


 

As required by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement Nos. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation ("SFAS 123"), and 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure ("SFAS 148"), the following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if stock-based compensation costs were to be calculated based on the fair value of the options granted and recognized ratably over the vesting period as prescribed in SFAS No. 123 (in thousands):

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED

NINE MONTHS ENDED



Sept 25,
2004

Sept 27,
2003

Sept 25,
2004

Sept 27,
2003





Net (loss) income, as reported

$ (6,065)

$ (861)

$ (3,345)

$ 2,762 

Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income, net of tax

78 

24 

414 

179 

Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax

(286)

(727)

(1,776)

(2,136)





Pro forma net income (loss)

$ (6,273)

$ (1,564)

$ (4,707)

$ 805 





Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic – as reported

$ (0.21)

$ (0.03)

$ (0.11)

$ 0.09 





Basic – pro forma

$ (0.22)

$ (0.05)

$ (0.16)

$ 0.03 





Diluted – as reported

$ (0.21)

$ (0.03)

$ (0.11)

$ 0.09 





Diluted - pro forma

$ (0.22)

$ (0.05)

$ (0.16)

$ 0.03 





 

 

 

In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a proposed Statement, Share-Based Payment, which would be an amendment to SFAS 123. This proposed standard would require share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values, and would eliminate the Company's ability to continue accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method in APB Opinion No. 25. The FASB expects to issue a final standard late in 2004, which would be effective for the Company's third quarter of fiscal year 2005 reporting period. Wild Oats has not yet determined to what degree this proposed standard will impact its future earnings and earnings per share.

 

 

4. Property and Equipment

 

As a result of the significant store closings, remodels and resets, the Company undertook a review of all fixtures and equipment in its stores in fiscal 2003, including a physical inventory in conjunction with an asset tagging exercise. During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company substantially completed the review and recorded a $1.5 million loss on disposal of fixtures and equipment that will no longer be used in the stores. In the third quarter of fiscal 2003, a physical count of all office and support facility capital assets was completed, and a $559,000 loss on disposal was recorded.

 

8


5. Long Term Debt and Liquidity

 

Contingent Convertible Senior Debentures. In June 2004, the Company issued $115 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.25% Convertible Senior Debentures due May 15, 2034 in a private placement. The debentures bear regular interest at the annual rate of 3.25%, payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each year until May 15, 2011, after which date, no regular interest will be due. Commencing May 20, 2011 and ending November 14, 2011, and for any six-month period thereafter, contingent interest will be due and payable in the amount of 0.25% of the average trading price of the debentures during a specified period, if the average trading price of the debentures equals or exceeds 125% of the principal amount of the debentures.

 

The debentures are callable and convertible into the Company’s common stock prior to maturity at the option of the holders under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after June 30, 2004 and before March 31, 2029, if the last reported sale price of our common stock is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price of $17.70 per share; (2) at any time on or after April 1, 2029 if the last reported sale price of our common stock on any date on or after March 31, 2029 is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price; (3) subject to certain limitations, during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading-day period in which the trading price per debenture for each day of that period was less than 98% of the product of the conversion rate and the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock; (4) if the Company calls the debentures for redemption; (5) upon the occurrence of certain corporate transactions; or (6) if the Company obtains credit ratings for the debentures, at any time when the credit ratings assigned to the debentures are below specified levels. The debentures are initially convertible into 56.5099 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount, which is equivalent to $17.70 per share, for total initial underlying shares of 6,498,639. Upon conversion, the Company has the right to deliver, in lieu of common stock, cash or any combination of cash and common stock. Pursuant to the underwriting agreement and within 90 days of issuance, the Company intends to file a shelf registration statement covering resales of the debentures and the common stock issuable upon conversion thereof.

 

On or after May 20, 2011, the Company may redeem for cash some or all of the debentures at any time and from time to time, for a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures plus accrued and unpaid contingent interest, if any. Holders have the right to require the Company to repurchase any or all debentures for cash, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest on: (1) May 15, 2011, May 15, 2014, and May 15, 2024; and (2) the occurrence of change in control (as defined in the debenture).

 

The debentures are unsecured and un-subordinated obligations, and rank equal in priority with all of the Company’s existing and future unsecured and un-subordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of its subordinated indebtedness. The debentures will effectively rank junior to any of the Company’s secured indebtedness and any of its indebtedness that is guaranteed by its subsidiaries. Payment of principal and interest on the debentures will be structurally subordinated to the liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.

 

Total proceeds from the issuance were $115.2 million. The Company used $25.0 million of the net proceeds to repurchase 1,977,800 outstanding shares of its common stock, $31.2 million to pay the outstanding balance on its credit facility, and approximately $3.6 million to pay related debt issuance costs.

 

Credit Facility. The Company’s credit facility has a $95.0 million limit, and a three-year term with a one-year renewal option. Under the credit facility, the Company has the option to increase the total facility to $135.0 million through the addition of new lenders and through the agreement of the current lending group to increase their total commitments.

 

As part of the credit facility, the Company has given its lenders collateral in the form of cash, equipment and fixtures, inventory and other assets. The Company has also granted leasehold mortgages in those leasehold interests previously mortgaged to secure its former credit facility, although it has no obligation to provide a security interest in any new leaseholds. There are various financial covenants included as part of the original credit agreement which are as follows: (1) maximum allowable leverage ratio, (2) minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, (3) maximum allowable annual capital expenditures and (4) a minimum permitted stockholders’ equity balance. Amendments to the credit agreement have been made during 2004 to (a) modify the adjusted leverage and the fixed charge ratios, (b) increase the maximum interest rate, and (c) require the Company to maintain through June 2005 minimum cash and cash equivalents balances (as defined per the agreement) of $25 million, net of letters of credit and outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, with the minimum required balances decreasing to $10 million beginning July 2005 and continuing through the remaining term of the agreement.

 

9


The interest rate on the facility is currently either prime plus 1.0% or one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% at the Company’s election, and the rates modify depending on the ratio of average total funded debt, as defined under the credit facility, plus six times rent expense, to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent ("EBITDAR") for the four fiscal quarter periods then ended, as calculated on the Company’s quarterly compliance certificate. Additionally, the Company is charged a commitment fee on the unused portion of the line ranging from 0.625% to 0.75% based on performance objectives as defined in the credit agreement. The outstanding balance on the credit facility, other than for outstanding letters of credit, was repaid in June 2004 from the proceeds of the private debt issuance. There is no outstanding credit facility balance as of September 25, 2004. The balance outstanding, other than outstanding letters of credit, on the credit facility as of December 27, 2003 was $30.2 million. As the Company’s new store growth accelerates, it expects its cash requirements for 2004 and 2005 will be primarily satisfied from the proceeds of the private debenture issuance as well as cash generated from operations.

 

The Company is currently, and expects to remain, in compliance with the monthly and quarterly financial covenants in the credit agreement. In the event that business conditions worsen, management has identified contingency actions to enable the Company to remain in compliance with the financial covenants. Even if the Company remains in compliance with its monetary covenants, a technical default could result due to a breach of the financial covenants. In the absence of a waiver or amendment to such financial covenants, such non-compliance would constitute a default under the credit agreement, and the lenders would be entitled to accelerate the maturity of the indebtedness outstanding thereunder. In the event that such non-compliance appears likely, or occurs, the Company will seek approval, as it has in the past, from the lenders to renegotiate financial covenants and/or obtain waivers, as required. However, there can be no assurance that future amendments or waivers will be obtained.

 

 

6. Derivatives and Hedging Activities

 

In accordance with the Company’s interest rate risk-management strategy and as required by the terms of the Company’s prior credit facility, in September 2000, the Company entered into a swap agreement to hedge the interest rate on $30.0 million of its borrowings as of March 29, 2003. The swap agreement locked in a one-month LIBOR rate of 6.7% and expired in August 2003. There was no obligation to renew the swap under the current facility. No interest rate swap agreements are outstanding as of September 25, 2004.

 

The Company does not have any derivative financial instruments as of September 25, 2004 that meet the criteria of SFAS 133, as amended.

 

 

7. Earnings Per Share

 

Earnings per share are calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share ("SFAS No. 128"). SFAS No. 128 requires the Company to report both basic earnings per share, which is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, and diluted earnings per share, which is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and all dilutive potential common shares outstanding, except where the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Anti-dilutive stock options of 1,190,480 and 1,533,438 for the three months and 614,830 and 1,219,048 for the nine months ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003, respectively, were not included in the earnings per share calculations.

 

The Emerging Issue Task Force ("the Task Force") of the Financial Accounting Standards Board reached a conclusion on Issue No. 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share. The Task Force has concluded that contingently convertible debt should be included in diluted earnings per share computations using the if-converted method regardless of whether any of the conversion contingencies have been met, which would represent a significant change in current accounting practice. If the Company had used the if-converted method in calculating diluted earnings per share for the quarter and nine months ending September 25, 2004, the effect would be anti-dilutive.

 

10


8. Goodwill and Finite Lived Intangible Assets

 

During the third quarter of 2004, no goodwill was recognized as a result of acquisitions, no goodwill was impaired and no other changes in the carrying amount of goodwill occurred.

 

Other intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

 

September 25

December 27,

2004

2003



Leasehold interests

$ 8,905      

$ 9,045      

Less accumulated amortization

(2,472)     

(2,240)    



6,433      

6,805      

Liquor licenses

259      

171      



$ 6,692      

$ 6,976      



 

 

 

Amortization expense related to finite lived intangible assets was $113,000 and $121,000 for the three months and $364,000 and $362,000 for the nine months ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003, respectively. The estimated amortization of finite lived intangible assets for each of the five fiscal years ending in fiscal 2008 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

FISCAL
YEAR

AMORTIZATION EXPENSE



2004

$ 481

2005

$ 491

2006

$ 475

2007

$ 471

2008

$ 461

 

 

 

9. Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges (Income)

 

During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recorded net restructuring and asset impairment charges of $2,124,000 consisting of the following components:

 

Change in estimate related to lease-related liabilities    for sites previously identified for closure or sale

$ 348,000 

Lease-related liability for sites closed during the    quarter

545,000 

Severance for employees terminated during the third    quarter of fiscal 2004

614,000 

Accretion expense on lease related liabilities

166,000 

Asset impairment charges

451,000 


Total restructuring and asset impairment expense

$ 2,124,000 


 

 

11


Details of the significant components are as follows:

  • Changes in estimate related to lease-related liabilities for sites previously identified for closure or sale ($348,000 of charges) – During the third quarter of 2004, the Company was notified that a subtenant in Ft. Collins, Colorado would not renew its sublease upon its expiration in December of 2004. The loss of the subtenant will require that the Company pay lease payments of $153,000, which had previously been paid by the sublessee. The Company incurred additional brokerage fees of $110,000 from a sublease agreement reached during second quarter 2004 for a vacant site in Missouri. The Company has also incurred additional interest and settlement costs of $85,000 related to litigation involving a Phoenix, Arizona location. Based on these changes in facts and circumstances and the related changes in estimates, the Company adjusted remaining lease-related liabilities previously recorded for these locations and recognized net restructuring loss of $348,000 during the third quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

  • Lease-related liability for site(s) closed during the third quarter ($545,000 of restructuring expense) - During the third quarter of 2004, the Company closed a store in Colorado Springs, Colorado and in Vancouver, Washington as part of relocations to new sites.

 

  • Severance for employees notified of termination in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 ($614,000 of restructuring expense) – During the third quarter of 2004, 67 employees were notified of their involuntary termination in connection with the closure of two stores and as part of a restructuring plan to streamline the Company’s operations. As of September 25, 2004, $250,000 in benefits had been paid to the employees.

 

  • Accretion expense on lease-related liabilties ($166,000 of restructuring expense) - Accretion expense accrued during the third quarter on reserves for lease-related liabilities that have been calculated using the net present value of the minimum lease payments (net of sublease income) resulted in additional restructuring expense of $166,000.

 

In addition to the net restructuring expense described above, management also identified during the third quarter of fiscal 2004 net asset impairment charges of $451,000 in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets for two stores held for use. Store assets became impaired during the quarter because the projected cash flows of the stores were not sufficient to fully recover the carrying value of the stores’ long-lived assets. The Company believes the weak performance of the stores were caused by increased competition. In determining whether an impairment exists, the Company estimates the store’s future cash flows on an undiscounted basis, and if the cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying value, then the Company uses a discounted cash flow based on a risk-adjusted discount rate, to adjust its carrying value of the assets, and records a provision for impairment as appropriate. The Company continually reevaluates its stores’ performance to monitor the carrying value of its long-lived assets in comparison to projected cash flows.

 

For the three fiscal quarters ending September 25, 2004, the Company recorded net restructuring and asset impairment charges of $2,289,000 consisting of the following components:

 

Change in estimate related to lease-related liabilities    for sites previously identified for closure or sale

$ (338,000)

Lease-related liability for site closed during the    quarter

585,000 

Severance for employees terminated during the    second quarter of fiscal 2004

705,000 

Accretion expense on lease related liabilities

369,000 

Asset impairment charges

968,000 


Total restructuring and asset impairment expense

$ 2,289,000 


 

12


Details of the significant components are as follows:

  • Changes in estimate related to lease-related liabilities for sites previously identified for closure or sale ($338,000 of restructuring income) – During the first quarter of 2004, the Company determined that additional time would be needed to dispose of certain lease obligations for vacant sites, resulting in restructuring expense of $236,000. During the second quarter, the Company recognized net restructuring income of $922,000, as a result of the following: the Company secured a viable subtenant for a vacant site, resulting in a reversal of $1.5 million of the net restructuring charge previously recorded; increased estimated reserve by $298,000 because information indicated the likelihood of receiving continued sublease income from a current subtenant was remote; and increased estimated reserves by $316,000 for additional time needed to dispose of lease obligations for three vacant sites. In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company was notified of nonrenewal by a subtenant and will be obligated for rental payments of $153,000 per year and had other changes in estimates totalling $195,000.

 

  • Lease-related liabilities for sites closed year to date through September 25, 2004 ($585,000 of restructuring expense) - During the year to date through September 25, 2004, the Company closed three stores and accrued for lease termination costs and remaining lease obligations.

 

  • Severance for employees notified of termination ($705,000 of restructuring expense) – During the year to date period ended September 25, 2004, 115 employees were notified of their involuntary termination in connection with four store closures and the Company’s structural reorganization. As of September 25, 2004, $341,000 of the benefits had been paid to the employees.

 

  • Accretion expense on lease-related liabilities ($369,000 of restructuring expense) - Accretion expense accrued during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 25, 2004 on reserves for lease-related liabilities that had been calculated using the net present value of the minimum lease payments (net of sublease income) resulted in additional restructuring expense of $369,000.

 

In addition to the net restructuring expense described above, for the fiscal year to date ended September 25, 2004, the Company has recorded $968,000 in asset impairment charges related to three stores held for use.

 

During the fiscal quarter and year to date ended September 25, 2004 respectively, we incurred $968,000 and $3,439,000, and for the fiscal quarter and year to date ended September 27, 2003, respectively, $727,000 and $2.0 million of charges for accelerated depreciation related to planned store closures. These costs are included in the "Cost of Goods Sold and Occupying Costs" line of our Statements of Operations.

 

 

13


The following table summarizes accruals related to the Company’s historic restructuring (in thousands):

 

 

EXIT

2001 AND

Q4

Q3

Q1

Q2

Q3

PLANS

PRIOR

2002

2003

2004

2004

2004

TOTAL


Balance:
  Dec 27, 2003

$ 10,732 

$ 458 

$ 181 

$ 11,371 

New accruals:
  Severance

$ 28 

28 

  Lease-related liabilities

200 

36 

236 

Cash paid:
  Severance

(13)

(26)

(15)

(54)

  Lease-related liabilities

(246)

(476)

(35)

(757)








Balance:
  March 27, 2004

$ 10,686 

$ 5 

$ 120 

$ 13 

$ 10,824 

New accruals:
  Severance

$ 63 

63 

  Lease-related liabilities

(1,088)

298 

70 

41 

(679)

Cash paid:
  Severance

(5)

(14)

(13)

(52)

(84)

  Lease-related liabilities

(449)

(27)

(35)

(511)








Balance:
  June 26, 2004

$ 9,149 

$ 271  

$ 141  

$ 0 

$ 52  

$ 9,613 

New accruals:
  Severance

$ 614 

614 

  Lease-related liabilities

514 

545 

1,059 

Cash paid:
  Severance

(34)

(251)

(285)

  Lease-related liabilities

(499)

(34)

(35)

(8)

(180)

(756)








Balance:
  Sep 25, 2004

$ 9,1641

$ 2371

$ 1061

$ 0 

$ 101

$ 7282

$ 10,2452








 

 

Note: 1. The restructuring accrual balance consists of lease-related liabilities.
2. The restructuring accrual balance consists of lease-related liabilities and $364,000 for employee termination benefits.

 

As of September 25, 2004, the components of the accruals related to the Company’s restructuring activities are accrued liabilities of $3.3 million and other long-term obligations of $6.9 million.

 

14


10. Income Taxes

 

 

The effective income tax rate of 28.4% for the nine months ended September 25, 2004 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to the expiration of certain charitable contribution carryforwards (-7.0%), state and foreign taxes (2.2%), permanent items (-1.1%), and other provision adjustments (.5%). For the nine months ended September 27, 2003, the difference between the effective rate of 39.0% and the statutory rate of 35.0% related primarily to the effects of state and foreign taxes.

 

For the nine months ended September 25, 2004, the Company recorded $1.3 million of income tax benefit, as a result of loss before income taxes of $4.7 million during the period. The Company has a $20.7 million net deferred tax asset, primarily as a result of net operating loss carry-forwards, and temporary differences relating to restructuring and asset impairment charges. The recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is primarily dependent upon the Company generating sufficient taxable income in the future. The Company has established a valuation allowances for certain state net operating loss and charitable contribution carry-forwards which the Company believes will not result in a future realizable tax benefit based upon projected taxable income during the carry-forward period. Although realization of the remaining net deferred tax asset is not assured, the Company has concluded that a valuation allowance is not required, as it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to realize a tax benefit through the generation of future taxable income. The Company's assessment is based upon projections, which assume the Company will at least maintain its current store contribution margin, and aggregate sales growth experienced over the past five years, which would generate sufficient taxable income to realize the full amount of the deferred tax asset. The Company believes that the sales, gross margin, store contribution margin, and selling, general and administrative expenses assumptions in its financial projections are reasonable and, more likely than not, attainable. The Company will continue to assess the recoverability of the remaining net deferred tax asset, and to the extent it is determined in the future that an additional valuation allowance is required, it will be recognized as a charge to earnings at that time.

 

11. Change in Primary Distributor

 

 

During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company and Tree of Life, Inc. ("TOL") agreed to terminate their primary distribution relationship, and in January 2004, the Company signed a five-year primary distribution agreement with United National Foods, Inc. ("UNFI"). The transition to UNFI was fully completed in March 2004. The agreement states that UNFI will pay the Company a conversion fee to cover the direct costs of the transition to UNFI along with certain incentives, which are payable over the period of the contract, subject to the Company meeting certain minimum purchase requirements.

 

 

12. Related Party Transactions

 

 

The Company and Perry D. Odak, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, and a director of the Board, entered into an employment agreement in March 2001. As part of Mr. Odak’s employment agreement, the Company agreed to purchase his home in York, Pennsylvania if he was unable to sell it within a specific period of time. In July 2001, the Company arranged for a relocation service to purchase the home from Mr. Odak for $1.6 million. Despite substantial marketing efforts, the relocation service was unable to sell the house for a reasonable price. In November 2002, Mr. Odak offered to repurchase the house for the original $1.6 million he had received. At December 28, 2002, Mr. Odak had remitted $1.35 million to the Company as partial consideration to fund the purchase and the remaining consideration was funded by Mr. Odak’s fiscal 2002 bonus of $250,000 to which he was contractually entitled. On March 6, 2003, the Company remitted the $1.6 million to the relocation service.

 

Mark Retzloff, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, is the President of Aurora Organic Dairy, which derives more than 5% of its revenues from the production and sale of organic milk to the Company under the Company’s private label.

 

15


13. Contingencies

 

 

Wild Oats Markets Canada, Inc., as successor to Alfalfa’s Canada, Inc., a Canadian subsidiary of the Company, is a defendant in Helen Fakhri and Ady Aylon, as Representative Plaintiffs v. Alfalfa’s Canada, Inc., a class action suit brought in the Supreme Court, British Columbia, Canada by representative plaintiffs alleging to represent two classes of plaintiffs – those who contracted Hepatitis A allegedly through the consumption of food purchased at a Capers Community Market in the spring of 2002, and those who were inoculated against Hepatitis A as a result of news alerts by Capers and the Vancouver Health Authority. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the action was certified as a class action by the court. The Company filed an appeal and a hearing was held in September 2004. The appeal was denied in October 2004. The Company intends to vigorously defend both class certification and the suit itself. The Company is not able to estimate the potential outcome of the suit at this time.

 

In April 2000, the Company was named as defendant in S/H – Ahwatukee, LLC and YP - Ahwatukee LLC v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, by a landlord alleging Wild Oats breached a continuous operations clause arising from the closure of a Phoenix, Arizona store. Plaintiff claimed $1.5 million for diminution of value of the shopping center plus accelerated rent, fees and $360,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs. After trial in November 2001, the judge awarded the plaintiff an aggregate $536,000 in damages and attorneys’ fees. The Company’s appeal of judgment was denied in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, and the Company filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied. The Company filed a petition for review with the Arizona Supreme Court, which was denied. The Company recognized a charge to restructuring expense during the fourth quarter of 2003 in the amount of $705,000, including estimated attorney’s fees and estimated interest accrued on the judgment. That amount was increased by $85,000 in September 2004.

 

The Company continued its review of past administrative practices of its 401(k) retirement plan, and the results of the review were completed during the third quarter of fiscal 2004. As a result, the Company filed a voluntary correction plan with the Internal Revenue Service related to the 401(k) plan. Pursuant to the Company’s audit, the Company has determined that it is obligated to contribute an estimated $1.2 million inclusive of earnings, to correct certain past administrative practices dating back to 1999, of which $1.0 million has been included in direct store expense and $0.2 million in selling, general and administrative expense.

 

The Company also is named as defendant in various actions and proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In all of these cases, the Company is denying the allegations and is vigorously defending against them and, in some cases, has filed counterclaims. Although the eventual outcome of the various lawsuits cannot be predicted, it is management’s opinion that these lawsuits will not result in liabilities that would materially affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

16


Item 2.  Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

This report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements regarding our future results of operations and performance. Important factors that could cause differences in results of operations include, but are not limited to, the timing, execution and performance of new stores, relocations, remodels, sales and closures; the timing and impact of and response to promotional and advertising campaigns; the impact of competition; changes in product supply or suppliers; changes in management information needs; changes in customer needs and expectations; governmental and regulatory actions; general industry or business trends or events; changes in economic or business conditions in general or affecting the natural foods industry in particular; and competition for and the availability of sites for new stores and potential acquisition candidates. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

 

Overview

 

Wild Oats Markets, Inc. is one of the largest natural foods supermarket chains in North America. As of the date of this report, we operated 108 natural foods stores in 24 states and British Columbia, Canada primarily under four names:

 

  • Wild Oats Natural Marketplace (nationwide)
  • Henry’s Farmers Market (Southern California and Phoenix, Arizona)
  • Sun Harvest Farms (Texas)
  • Capers Community Market (British Columbia, Canada)

 

 

Executive Summary

 

In order to drive increased sales and customer traffic in our stores, we are developing new marketing initiatives, including marketing outside of traditional venues, to increase consumers’ understanding of our products and to build brand awareness. We continue to expand our line of private label line of products, including the Wild Oats(R) and the Henry’s Marketplace(R) branded products. We are currently testing the sale of Wild Oats branded products through Peapod LLC, a leading U.S. Internet grocer, in the Chicago metropolitan area, and are working with Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC, the largest food retailer in the northeastern U.S., to test a Wild Oats branded store-within-a-store concept in select test stores. We anticipate that such test will commence in the first half of 2005.

 

As of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we had 106 stores located in 24 states and Canada, as compared to 101 stores in 25 states and Canada at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2003.

 

TOTAL STORE COUNT

Nine Months Ending

Nine Months Ending

September 27, 2003

September 25, 2004



Store count at beginning of period

99 

103 

Stores opened

Stores closed

(3)

(5)

Stores sold

-  

(1)



Store count at end of period

101 

106 



 

 

 

In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we opened three new stores, one in metropolitan Cincinnati, Ohio and two in metropolitan Los Angeles, California, and closed stores in Colorado Springs, Colorado and Vancouver, Washington as part of relocation to new sites. After the close of the third quarter, we opened stores in Vancouver, Washington and Carmel, Indiana. In fiscal 2004, through the date of this report, we have opened eleven new stores, closed five stores (two of which were relocated to new stores and one of which subsequently reopened in a different format) and sold one store. In fiscal 2004, we have commenced remodeling and/or major resetting of 12 of our stores, one of which was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

17


Results of Operations

 

Our net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 was $6.1 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $861,000, or $0.03 per diluted share, in the same period in fiscal 2003. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain selected income statement data expressed as a percentage of sales and in dollars (in thousands - percentages may not add due to rounding):

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED


Sep 25,

Sep 25,

Sep 27,

Sep 27,

2004

2004

2003

2003





Sales

$250,739 

100.0%

$237,028 

100.0%

Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs

181,864 

72.5   

168,158 

70.9   





Gross profit

68,875 

27.5   

68,870 

29.1   

Direct store expenses

57,898 

23.1   

53,114 

22.4   

Selling, general and administrative    expenses

15,517 

6.2   

15,472 

6.5   

Loss on disposal of assets

192 

0.1   

661 

0.3   

Pre-opening expenses

1,399 

0.6   

616 

0.3   

Restructuring and asset impairment    charges, net

2,124 

0.8   

134 

0.1   





Loss from operations

(8,255)

(3.3)  

(1,127)

(0.5)  

Interest income

370 

0.1   

199 

0.1   

Interest expense

(1,179)

(0.5)  

(484)

(0.2)  





Loss before income taxes

(9,064)

(3.6)  

(1,412)

(0.6)  

Income tax benefit

(2,999)

(1.2)  

(551)

(0.2)  





Net loss

$ (6,065)

(2.4)%

$ (861)

(0.4)%





 

 

 

NINE MONTHS ENDED


Sep 25,

Sep 25,

Sep 27,

Sep 27,

2004

2004

2003

2003





Sales

$766,231 

100.0%

$715,263 

100.0%

Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs

547,070 

71.4    

504,312 

70.5    





Gross profit

219,161 

28.6    

210,951 

29.5    

Direct store expenses

171,212 

22.3    

154,305 

21.6    

Selling, general and administrative    expenses

45,456 

5.9    

48,246 

6.7    

Loss on disposal of assets

170 

0.0    

2,029 

0.3    

Pre-opening expenses

3,500 

0.5    

1,639 

0.2    

Restructuring and asset impairment    (income) charges, net

2,289 

0.3    

(1,747)

(0.2)   





(Loss) income from operations

(3,466)

(0.5)   

6,479 

0.9    





Loss on early extinguishment of debt

-    

-    

(186)

0.0    

Interest income

778 

0.1    

554 

0.1    

Interest expense

(1,986)

(0.3)   

(2,319)

(0.3)   





Income (loss) before income taxes

(4,674)

(0.6)   

4,528 

0.6    

Income tax expense (benefit)

(1,329)

(0.2)   

1,766 

0.2    





Net income (loss)

$ (3,345)

(0.4)%

$ 2,762 

0.4% 





 

 

18


 

Sales. Net sales for the three and nine months ended September 25, 2004 increased 5.8% and 7.1%, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2003. The quarter and year to date increases were primarily driven by three and nine additional new stores in the quarter and year to date, respectively. Comparable store basket size grew 3.5% and 4.7% for the fiscal quarter and year to date ended September 25, 2004 as compared to the same period last year, while customer traffic for the same periods declined (4.1%) and (1.6%), respectively. Comparable store sales declined 0.61% for the quarter, and increased 3.1% for the fiscal year to date as compared to the same periods last year due to a combination of several factors, including continued aggressive promotional activity by southern California conventional grocers seeking to regain lost business and increased competition in selected areas. We deem sales of a new, relocated or acquired stores comparable commencing in the thirteenth full month of operations.

 

 

Gross Profit. Gross profit consists of sales less cost of goods sold and store occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include store related depreciation, rent and utilities. As a percentage of sales, gross profit decreased to 27.5% and 28.6% in the third quarter and year to date of fiscal 2004 from 29.1% and 29.5% in the same periods in fiscal 2003, due primarily to selected price reductions to retain current customers, as well as increased promotional activity in selected regions to attract new customers, the combined impact of which is estimated at 130 basis points. Margins declined by 30 basis points and 20 basis points for the quarter and year to date ended September 25, 2004, due to the effect of newer stores (i.e., opened within the last 12 months) increasing as a percentage of our total store base. New stores historically carry lower margins for some period of time after opening due to higher shrink and heavy promotional activity. In addition, gross profit as a percentage of sales declined 0.10% and 0.19%, respectively, due to increases in accelerated depreciation. To a lesser extent, overall margins for the quarter and year to date were negatively impacted by increases in fuel costs not fully recovered through retail price increases.

 

Direct Store Expenses. Direct store expenses include the following: payroll, taxes and benefits, store supplies and maintenance and other store-specific contract cost. In addition, corrective payments under our 401(k) voluntary correction plan are allocated, as benefits are, to the direct store expenses. As a percentage of sales, direct store expenses increased to 23.1% and 22.3% in the fiscal quarter and year to date ended September 25, 2004, from 22.4% and 21.6% in the same periods last year. This was due to a number of factors, including higher than average labor costs associated with new store openings in fiscal 2004 (which traditionally carry higher payroll expense during the initial months of operation), increasing health care costs and a $1.0 million expense for the voluntary compliance program being filed by the Company related to its 401(k) retirement program.

 

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses include the following: corporate and regional administrative support services, corporate-level purchasing and marketing and travel. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal quarter and year to date ended September 25, 2004 and September 27, 2003 increased 0.3% and decreased 5.8%, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2003. Savings from our third quarter reorganization were offset by increased marketing costs, and approximately $0.2 million in estimated correction costs, and approximately $0.2 million in legal and consulting fees associated with the preparation and filing of our voluntary correction of past administrative practices related to our 401(k) retirement plan, as well as costs necessary to ensure our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The year to date decrease relates primarily to a shift in the timing of our marketing initiatives in 2004 as compared to 2003. The remaining decrease is a result of leveraging fixed costs against higher sales.

 

 

Loss (Gain) on Disposal of Assets. We recorded a $170,000 net loss on disposal of assets for the nine months ended September 25, 2004 compared to a $2.0 million loss in the same period in fiscal 2003, due primarily to the completion of a physical count of all store, office and support facility assets in fiscal 2003, which resulted in a total write off of $1.2 million.

 

 

Pre-Opening Expenses. Pre-opening expenses include labor, rent, advertising, utilities, supplies and certain other costs incurred prior to a store’s opening. Pre-opening expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 increased to $1.4 million compared to $616,000 during the same period in fiscal 2003 due to the opening of three new stores in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and two additional new stores in the beginning of the fourth quarter, compared to two during the third quarter last year. The increase of 113.5% in pre-opening expenses for the nine months ended September 25, 2004 over the same period last year was due to the opening of nine stores in the first three fiscal quarters of fiscal 2004, as compared to five in the same period in 2003.

 

19


Restructuring and Asset Impairment Expense (Income). During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we recorded net restructuring and asset impairment expense of $2,124,000. Details of the significant components are as follows:

 

 

Changes in estimate related to lease-related liabilities for sites previously identified for closure or sale ($348,000 of restructuring charge) – During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we became aware that a subtenant in Ft. Collins, Colorado has decided to not renew a sublease agreement as of the end of the year. Our loss of the subtenant will require us to pay additional lease payments of $153,000, which had previously beeen paid by the sublessee. We incurred additional brokerage fees of $110,000 for a sublease agreement reached during the second quarter of 2004 for a vacant site in Missouri. We have also incurrred additional interest and settlement costs of $85,000 for litigation related to a Phoenix, Arizona location. As a result, we recognized net restructuring losses of $348,000 during the third quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

 

Lease-related liability for sites closed during the third quarter ($545,000 of restructuring expense) - During the third quarter of 2004, we closed two stores, one in Colorado Springs, Colorado and one in Vancouver, Washington as part of relocations to new sites.

 

 

Severance for employees notified of termination in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 ($614,000 of restructuring expense) – During the third quarter, 67 employees were notified of their involuntary termination in conjunction with the closure of stores in Colorado Springs, Colorado and Vancouver, Washington, ($114,000) and the restructuring of the Company’s divisional structure to a functional structure ($500,000).

 

 

Accretion expense on lease-related liabilties ($166,000 of restructuring expense) - Accretion expense accrued during the quarter on reserves for lease-related liabilities that have been calculated using the net present value of the minimum lease payments (net of sublease income) resulted in additional restructuring expense of $166,000.

 

In addition to the net restructuring income described above, management also identified during the third quarter of fiscal 2004 net asset impairment charges of $451,000 in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets for two stores held for use. Store assets became impaired during the quarter because the projected cash flows of the store were not sufficient to fully recover the carrying value of the store’s long-lived assets, and, therefore, recorded an asset impairment charge. We believe the weak performance of the store was caused by increased competition. In determining whether an impairment exists, we estimate the store’s future cash flows on an undiscounted basis, and if the cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying value, then we use a discounted cash flow based on a risk-adjusted discount rate, to adjust its carrying value of the assets and records a provision for impairment as appropriate. We believe the weak performance of the store was caused by increased competition. We continually reevaluate our stores’ performance to monitor the carrying value of its long-lived assets in comparison to projected cash flows.

 

 

Restructuring and Asset Impairment Expense (Income). For the fiscal year to date through September 25, 2004, we recorded net restructuring and asset impairment charges of $2,289,000. Details of the significant components are as follows:

 

 

Changes in estimate related to lease-related liabilities for sites previously identified for closure or sale ($338,000 of restructuring income) –During the first quarter, we determined that additional time would be needed to dispose of certain lease obligations for vacant sites, resulting in restructuring expense of $236,000. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, we recognized net restructuring income of $922,000, as a result of the following: We secured a viable subtenant for a vacant site, resulting in a reversal of $1.5 million of the net restructuring charge previously recorded; increased estimated reserve by $298,000 because information relating to a previously subleased site indicated the likelihood of receiving continued sublease income from a current subtenant was remote; and increased estimated reserves by $316,000 for additional time needed to dispose of lease obligations for three vacant sites. Whereas in the third quarter, we lost a subtenant and are obligated for rental payments of $153,000 and had changes in estimates totalling $195,000.

 

20


 

Newly identified lease-related liabilities for sites closed during year to date through September 25, 2004 ($585,000 of restructuring charges) - During the year to date through September 25, 2004, we closed stores in Colorado, Oregon and Washington.

 

 

Severance for employees notified of termination ($705,000 of restructuring expense) – During the first, second and third quarters of 2004, respectively, 26, 22 and 67 employees were notified of their involuntary termination in conjunction with the closure of several stores and the reorganization of the Company’s operations to a functional structure.

 

 

Accretion expense on lease-related liabilities ($369,000 of restructuring expense) - Accretion expense accrued during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 25, 2004 on reserves for lease-related liabilities that have been calculated using the net present value of the minimum lease payments (net of sublease income) resulted in restructuring expense of $369,000.

 

 

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. During 2003, we had a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $186,000. There has been no other such activity during fiscal 2004.

 

 

Interest Income. Interest income increased to $370,000 and $778,000 for the fiscal quarter and year to date ended September 25, 2004 from $199,000 and $554,000 for the fiscal quarter and year to date ended September 27, 2003, respectively. The increases for the quarter and year to date are due to increased cash on hand from the second quarter 2004 debenture offering, together with increased yields from our purchase of short-term investments.

 

 

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the fiscal quarter ended September 25, 2004 increased 144% to $1.2 million from $484,000 in the same period in fiscal 2003, as a direct result of the issuance of $115 million in 3.25% senior subordinated debentures in June 2004, offset by interest savings from the repayment of outstanding borrowings under the credit facility. Interest expense for the fiscal year to date period ended September 25, 2004 decreased $300,000 to $2.0 million from $2.3 million as compared to the same period in fiscal 2003, due to lower average borrowings under our credit of facility as well as the expiration of the interest rate swap in August 2003, which increased interest expense for the fiscal year to date ended September 27, 2003 by $980,000. These savings were offset by the additional interest expense payable on the debentures issued in June 2004.

 

 

Income Tax Expense. For the fiscal quarter ended September 25, 2004, we recorded $3.0 million of income tax benefit, as a result of losses before income taxes of $9.1 million during the period. Income tax benefit for the fiscal year to date ended September 25, 2004 is $1.3 million as a result of losses before taxes of $4.7 million during the same period. The effective tax for the fiscal quarter and year to date ended September 25, 2004 was adversely impacted by an estimated 7.0% by the expiration of certain charitable contribution carryforwards. See "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources" below.

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

21


On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the continued appropriateness of our accounting policies and resulting estimates, including those related to:

 

  • Goodwill valuation
  • Asset impairment charges
  • Restructuring charges and store closing costs
  • Inventory valuation and reserves
  • Self-insurance reserves

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. There have been no changes during the third quarter of 2004 in application of these policies:

 

 

Goodwill. Goodwill consists of the excess cost of acquired companies over the sum of the fair market value of their underlying tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually at a reporting unit level, or more frequently if certain indicators of impairment exist. The Company has one reporting unit at the enterprise level to which it allocates goodwill. The Company estimates fair value utilizing a combination of three different methods, consisting of market capitalization, discounted future cash flows, and EBITDA multiples, and compares it to the carrying value of the enterprise for purposes of identifying potential impairment.

 

The annual review for impairment relies heavily on our ability to accurately project future cash flows, which in itself, requires the extensive use of accounting judgment and financial assumptions and estimates. These projections can be affected by many items that are inter-dependent on one another and are outside of our control and ability to predict except at the time of evaluation, such as changes in the economy, trends effecting the natural and organic food industry, and changing competitive pressures. Application of alternative assumptions such as evaluating for impairment at a level of the organization other than enterprise could produce significantly different results.

 

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We monitor the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, for potential impairment whenever changes in circumstance indicate a potential for impairment may exist. The triggering events for evaluations of finite lived intangible assets include a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, acquisition and construction costs in excess of budget, or current store operating losses combined with a history of losses or a projection of continuing losses. If impairment is identified, based on undiscounted future cash flows, management compares the asset’s future cash flows, discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate, to its current carrying value and records a provision for impairment as appropriate. With respect to equipment and leasehold improvements associated with closed stores, the value of these assets is adjusted to reflect recoverable values estimated based on our previous efforts to dispose of similar assets, with consideration for current economic conditions.

 

Our review for impairment relies heavily on our ability to accurately project future cash flows related to our stores and support facilities. Our cash flow projections look several years into the future and include assumptions about sales growth and cost trends that could be significantly impacted by changes in the local and national economy, trends in the natural and organic food industry, local competitive pressures, as well as the effectiveness of various operational initiatives underway in our stores.

 

 

Restructuring and Store Closure Costs. The Company reserves for the present value of lease related costs associated with store and support facility closures, relocations, and sales when the store or facility is closed. The calculation of the lease related liabilities involves applying a discount rate to the estimation of our remaining lease obligations, taxes and common area maintenance, net of future estimated subtenant income. The lease liabilities usually are paid over the lease terms associated with the closed stores, which have had remaining terms ranging from one month to 25 years. Store closing liabilities are reviewed each reporting period to ensure that the amounts recorded reasonably reflect the Company’s future obligations associated with closed stores and facilities based on the most current information available. Adjustments to existing lease related liabilities are primarily a result of changes in the expected timing or amount of subtenant income, and are made in the period in which the change in facts and circumstances, as well as their related impacts, become known and estimatable. Lease related closure costs and associated severance costs are made in accordance with SFAS 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit of Disposal Activities." Severance costs incurred in connection with store closings are recorded when the employees have been identified and notified of the termination benefits to be made to the employees.

 

22


In evaluating the reserves for lease related liabilities, management considers a number of variables that would affect the marketability of the space such as recent demand for similar space in the market area, the number of potential subtenants expressing interest, specific characteristics of the property, any limitations in the use of the space imposed by the landlord, as well as the creditworthiness of actual subtenants. The above factors are continuously reevaluated and have a significant impact on management’s assumptions used in estimating the timing and amount of any subtenant income, and thus the amount of required reserves.

 

 

Inventory. Our inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis using the retail method of accounting to determine cost of sales and inventory for approximately 80% of inventories and using the item cost method for highly perishable products representing approximately 20% of inventories in our stores. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are determined by applying a cost-to-retail ratio for various categories of similar items to the retail value of inventories. Inherent in the retail inventory method calculations are certain management judgments and estimates, including shrinkage, which could significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost as well as the resulting gross margins. Physical inventory counts are taken at each location to ensure that the amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements are properly stated as of the end of each reporting period.

 

We maintain allowances for excess or unsaleable inventory as a percentage of its gross inventory balance based on historical experience and assumptions about market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, or if we expand our forward buying of inventory, which will increase our inventory levels, then additional inventory write-downs may be required.

 

 

Self-Insurance. We use a combination of stop-loss insurance and are self-insured for losses relating to worker’s compensation claims, general liability and employee medical and dental benefits. We have purchased stop-loss coverage in order to limit exposure to any significant claim or levels of claims that would be catastrophic to our Company. Self-insured losses are accrued based upon estimates of the aggregate uninsured claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry which are based on our industry’s experience as well as the Company’s historical claims experience. While we believe that the assumptions and methodology used are appropriate, the estimated accruals for these liabilities could be significantly affected if actual loss development and payment patterns vary significantly from the assumptions and historical trends utilized.

 

 

Remainder of 2004. Comparable store sales for fiscal 2004 are expected to be in the range of 1.0% to 1.5%, with quarterly comparable store sales (4.0%) to (5.0%) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, as we compare to results during the fourth quarter 2003 grocery store strike in Southern California which impacted 23 of our stores. Gross profit margins for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and the fiscal year are expected to be approximately 28.0%, driven by continued pricing and promotional activity. We anticipate investing the savings generated from our third quarter reorganization in increased advertising.

 

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of capital have been cash flow from operations (which includes trade payables), bank indebtedness, and the sale of equity securities. In addition to these, we have also raised an additional $112.3 million, net of sales commissions, in capital through the issuance of contingent convertible senior debentures in a private placement in June 2004, as discussed below. Primary uses of cash have been the financing of new store development, new store openings, relocations, remodels and acquisitions and repayment of debt.

 

23


Net cash generated by operating activities decreased to $24.6 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2004, as compared to $26.2 million during the same period in fiscal 2003. This decrease is due primarily to the net loss of $3.3 million offset by non-cash increases to depreciation and amortization and restructuring charges and decreases in losses on disposal of assets, deferred expenses and other non-cash items that reconcile net income to cash, as well as increases to inventories over the same period of last year. Other offsetting factors include a reduction in accounts receivable, increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities that out pace prior year.

 

Net cash used in investing activities of $68.3 million during the fiscal year-to-date, 2004 was greater than the $21.7 million reported during the same period in fiscal 2003, due to the significant increased investment in new stores and the investment of excess cash from the debentures.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities was $54.2 million during the fiscal year-to-date 2004 as compared to a $4.7 million use of cash during the same period in fiscal 2003. The increase in cash flows from financing activities is the direct result of the $115 million debenture offering completed in June 2004 as discussed below.

 

For the fiscal year to date ended September 25, 2004, we recorded $1.3 million of income tax benefit, as a result of income before loss taxes of $3.6 million during the period. We have a $20.7 million net deferred tax asset, primarily as a result of net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences relating to restructuring and asset impairment charges. The recoverability of the remaining net deferred tax asset is primarily dependent upon our generation of sufficient taxable income in the future. We have established a valuation allowance for certain state net operating loss carryforwards, which we believe will not result in a future realizable tax benefit based upon projected taxable income in those states during the carry forward period. Although realization of the remaining net deferred tax asset is not assured, we have concluded that a valuation allowance is not required, as it is more likely than not that we will be able to realize a tax benefit through the generation of future taxable income. Our assessment is based upon projections that assume we will at least maintain its current store contribution margin, and aggregate sales growth experienced over the past five years, which would generate sufficient taxable income to realize the full amount of the deferred tax asset. We believe that the sales, gross margin, store contribution margin, and selling, general and administrative expenses assumptions in its financial projections are reasonable and, more likely than not, attainable. We will continue to assess the recoverability of the remaining net deferred tax asset, and to the extent it is determined in the future that an additional valuation allowance is required, it will be recognized as a charge to earnings at that time.

 

 

Contingent Convertible Senior Debentures. In June 2004, we issued $115 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% Convertible Senior Debentures due May 15, 2034 in a private placement. Of the $115.2 million in total proceeds, we used $25.0 million to repurchase 1,977,800 shares of our common stock, $31.2 million to repay the outstanding balance on our credit facility, (other than for outstanding letters of credit) and approximately $3.6 million to pay related debt issuance costs. We intend to use the remaining proceeds to accelerate our store growth plans and for general corporate purposes.

 

The debentures bear interest at the annual rate of 3.25%, payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each year until May 15, 2011, after which date no regular interest will be due. During the period commencing May 20, 2011 and ending November 14, 2011, if the average trading price of the debentures for the last five trading-days immediately preceding May 20, 2011, equals 125% or more or the principal amount of the debenture, and thereafter for a six-month period if the average trading price during the five trading-days prior to the period equals or exceeds 125%, we will pay contingent interest of 0.25% of the average trading price of the debentures during the five-day trading period.

The debentures are callable and convertible into our common stock prior to maturity at the option of the holders under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after June 30, 2004 and before March 31, 2029, if the last reported sale price of our common stock is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price of $17.70 per share; (2) at any time on or after April 1, 2029 if the last reported sale price of our common stock on any date on or after March 31, 2029 is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price; (3) subject to certain limitations, during the five-business day period after any five consecutive trading-day period in which the trading price per debenture for each

 

24


day of that period was less than 98% of the product of the conversion rate and the last reported sale price of our common stock; (4) if we call the debentures for redemption; (5) upon the occurrence of certain corporate transactions; or (6) if we obtain credit ratings for the debentures, at any time when the credit ratings assigned to the debentures are below specified levels. The debentures are initially convertible into 56.5099 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount, which is equivalent to $17.70 per share, for a total initial conversion into 6,498,639 shares. Upon conversion, we have the right to deliver, in lieu of common stock, cash or any combination of cash and common stock. Pursuant to the underwriting agreement and within 90 days of issuance, we intend to file a shelf registration statement covering resales of the debentures and the common stock issuable upon conversion thereof.

 

On or after May 20, 2011, we may redeem for cash some or all of the debentures at any time and from time to time, for a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures plus accrued and unpaid contingent interest, if any. Holders have the right to require the Company to repurchase any or all debentures for cash, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest on: (1) May 15, 2011, May 15, 2014, and May 15, 2024; and (2) the occurrence of change in control (as defined in the debenture).

 

The debentures are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations, and rank equal in priority with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of our subordinated indebtedness.

 

The debentures will effectively rank junior to any of our secured indebtedness and any of our indebtedness that is guaranteed by our subsidiaries. Payment of principal and interest on the debentures will be structurally subordinated to the liabilities of our subsidiaries.

 

 

Credit Facility. Our credit facility has a $95 million limit and has a three-year term with a one-year renewal option. Under the facility, we have the option to increase the total facility to $135.0 million through the addition of new lenders and through the agreement of the current lending group to increase their total commitments.

 

As part of the credit facility, we have given our lenders collateral in the form of cash, equipment and fixtures, inventory and other assets. We have also granted leasehold mortgages in those leasehold interests previously mortgaged to secure our former credit facility, although we have no obligation to provide a security interest in any new leaseholds. In connection with the private debt offering in June 2004, the credit facility was amended in the second quarter to, among other things, (1) increase the maximum allowable leverage ratio, (2) permit the repurchase of the Company’s common stock, within specified limits, (3) increase the annual limits on capital expenditures and new leases, (4) raise the limit on the value of acquisitions and divestitures the Company can make without the consent of the lending group, and (5) increase the maximum percentage rate to either prime plus 0.1% or one month LIBOR plus 2.5%. The credit agreement was subsequently amended in August 2004 to further increase the maximum allowable leverage ratio. The amendment requires that the Company maintain a minimum cash balance, net of letters of credit and outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, of $25 million through the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2005. Effective November 4, 2004, the credit facility was further amended to (a) amend the definition of certain of the ratios, (b) increase the adjusted leverage and decrease the fixed charge ratios, (c) increase the pricing of borrowings under the facility, (d) extend the covenant on minimum cash balances through the maturity date and decrease the minimum cash balances required to $10 million beginning in July 2005, and (e) amend covenants on capital expenditures, new leases, acquisitions and stock buy-backs.

As amended, the interest rate on the facility is currently either prime plus 1.0% or one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% at our election, and the rates modify depending on the ratio of average total funded debt, as defined under the credit facility, plus six times rent expense, to EBITDAR for the four fiscal quarter periods then ended, as calculated on our quarterly compliance certificate. Additionally, we are charged a commitment fee on the unused portion of the line based on performance objectives as defined in the credit agreement. The outstanding balance on the credit facility was repaid in June 2004 from the proceeds of the private debenture issuance. There were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, and three letters of credit outstanding totaling $7.3 million as of September 25, 2004. The balance outstanding on the credit facility as of September 27, 2003 was $37.3 million. As our new store growth accelerates, we expect that our cash requirements for 2004 and through the third quarter of fiscal 2005 will be primarily satisfied from the proceeds of the private debenture issuance as well as cash generated from operations, and thereafter from cash generated from operations and borrowings under the credit facility.

 

25


Capital Expenditures. We spent approximately $13.5 million during the third quarter and $43.0 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 for new store construction, remodels and other capital expenditures. Our average capital expenditures to open a leased store, including leasehold improvements, equipment and fixtures, have ranged from approximately $2.0 million to $5.0 million historically, excluding inventory costs and initial operating losses. We anticipate that the average capital expenditures to open a natural foods supermarket format store will be $2.1 million to $3.9 million in the future; however, our ability to negotiate turnkey leases in the future will result in substantially lower capital expenditure per store, in return for a slightly higher rent rate over the lease term. Our average capital expenditures to open a farmers’ market format store are estimated at $1.6 million to $3.0 million in the future. Delays in opening new stores may result in increased capital expenditures and increased pre-opening costs for the site, as well as lower than planned sales for the Company.

 

Based upon the current level of operations, we believe that cash flows from operations and other sources available such as cash from our debentures and available line of credit will be adequate to meet anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, interest payments and future debenture payments in the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that the business will continue to generate cash flows from operations at current levels or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under the line of credit.

 

 

 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements," within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve known and unknown risks. Such forward-looking statements include statements as to the Company's plans to open, acquire or relocate additional stores; the anticipated performance of such stores; the impact of competition and current economic uncertainty; the sufficiency of funds to satisfy the Company's cash requirements through the remainder of fiscal 2004, our expectations for comparable store sales; expected pre-opening expenses and capital expenditures; and other statements containing words such as "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," "may," "intends" and words of similar import or statements of management's opinion. These forward-looking statements and assumptions involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, market performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause differences in results of operations include, but are not limited to, the timing and execution of new store openings, relocations, remodels, sales and closures; the impact of competition; changes in product supply or suppliers and supplier performance levels; changes in management information needs; changes in customer needs and expectations; governmental and regulatory actions; general industry or business trends or events; changes in economic or business conditions in general or affecting the natural foods industry in particular; and competition for and the availability of sites for new stores and potential acquisition candidates. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this Report.

 

 

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates and the value of foreign currency. The Company employs various financial instruments to manage certain exposures when practical.

 

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk. The Company owns and operates three natural foods supermarkets and a commissary kitchen in British Columbia, Canada. The commissary supports the three Canadian stores and does not independently generate sales revenue. Sales made from the Canadian stores are made in exchange for Canadian dollars. To the extent that those revenues are repatriated to the United States, the amounts repatriated are subject to the exchange rate fluctuations between the two currencies. The Company does not hedge against this risk because of the small amounts of funds at risk.

 

26


As previously noted, outstanding borrowings on the credit facility were paid with the proceeds of the debenture issuance in June 2004. However, should we begin drawing on the credit facility for additional capital, our exposure to interest rate changes would be primarily related to our variable rate debt issued under our credit facility. The total commitment available is $95.0 million under a revolving line of credit, with a three-year term expiring February 25, 2006. The interest rate on the credit facility is currently either prime plus 1.0% or one-month LIBOR plus 2.75%, at our election, and the rates modify depending on the ratio of average total funded debt, as defined under the credit facility, plus six times rent expense, to EBITDAR for the four fiscal quarter periods then ended, as calculated on our quarterly compliance certificate. Because the interest rate on the facility is variable, based upon the prime rate or LIBOR, the Company's interest expense and net income would be affected by interest rate fluctuations.

 

In September 2000, as required by our former credit facility, we entered into an interest rate swap to hedge its exposure on variable rate debt positions. Variable rates are predominantly linked to LIBOR as determined by one-month intervals. The interest rate provided by the swap fixed one-month LIBOR at 6.7%. At June 28, 2003, the notional principal amount of the interest rate swap agreement was $30.0 million, and expired in August 2003. There is no obligation to renew the swap under the refinanced facility. The notional amount is the amount used for the calculation of interest payments that are exchanged over the life of the swap transaction on the amortized principal balance.

 

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain a system of controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the financial statements and other disclosures included in this report, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use or disposition. We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) under supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

 

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During the fiscal quarter ended September 25, 2004, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

27


 

Part II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

Wild Oats Markets Canada, Inc., as successor to Alfalfa’s Canada, Inc., a Canadian subsidiary of the Company, is a defendant in Helen Fakhri and Ady Aylon, as Representative Plaintiffs v. Alfalfa’s Canada, Inc., a class action suit brought in the Supreme Court, British Columbia, Canada by representative plaintiffs alleging to represent two classes of plaintiffs – those who contracted Hepatitis A allegedly through the consumption of food purchased at a Capers Community Market in the spring of 2002, and those who were inoculated against Hepatitis A as a result of news alerts by Capers and the Vancouver Health Authority. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the action was certified as a class action by the court. The Company filed an appeal and a hearing was held in September 2004. The appeal was denied in October 2004. The Company intends to vigorously defend both class certification and the suit itself. The Company is not able to estimate the potential outcome of the suit at this time.

 

In April 2000, the Company was named as defendant in S/H – Ahwatukee, LLC and YP - Ahwatukee LLC v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, by a landlord alleging Wild Oats breached a continuous operations clause arising from the closure of a Phoenix, Arizona store. Plaintiff claimed $1.5 million for diminution of value of the shopping center plus accelerated rent, fees and $360,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs. After trial in November 2001, the judge awarded the plaintiff an aggregate $536,000 in damages and attorneys’ fees. The Company’s appeal of judgment was denied in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, and the Company filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied. The Company filed a petition for review with the Arizona Supreme Court, which was denied. The Company recognized a charge to restructuring expense during the fourth quarter of 2003 in the amount of $705,000, including estimated attorney’s fees and estimated interest accrued on the judgment. That amount was increased by $85,000 in September 2004.

 

The Company also is named as defendant in various actions and proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In all of these cases, the Company is denying the allegations and is vigorously defending against them and, in some cases, has filed counterclaims. Although the eventual outcome of the various lawsuits cannot be predicted, it is management’s opinion that these lawsuits will not result in liabilities that would materially affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

 

 

Item 2.  Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities.

None.

 

 

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

 

 

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

 

 

Item 5.  Other Information

The Company granted restricted stock units ("RSUs"), each exchangeable for one share of common stock of the Company, to David Gallitano, as monthly compensation for service as Chairman of the Audit Committee, on August 31, 2004, in the amount of 108 RSUs, on September 30, 2004, in the amount of 110 RSUs and on October 29, 2004, in the amount of 157 RSUs. Board members Brian Devine, Stacey Bell, David Chamberlain, David Gallitano, Mark Retzloff and John Shields each received a grant of 552 RSUs as compensation for their attendance at the November 3, 2004 meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors. Board members receive a grant of RSUs for attendance at each Board meeting, with the number determinable based on the Board meeting fee divided by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the day of the meeting. All of the RSUs are granted under the Wild Oats Markets, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan. The RSUs and the circumstances under which they are granted as compensation to members of the Company’s Board of Directors are described in detail under the caption "Compensation of Directors" in our Definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Annual Meeting of stockholders held on May 6, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 18, 2004. Additional disclosure concerning the grant of RSUs is contained in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 3 –Stock Based Compensation." The form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement used to evidence such grants is attached as Exhibit 10.1 hereto.

 

28


Item 6.  Exhibits

Exhibit Number

Description

10.1#+

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement used to evidence Restricted Stock Units granted under the Wild Oats Markets, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan

10.2+

Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2004, by and among Wild Oats Markets, Inc., the lenders identified therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent. Portions have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

31.1+

CEO Certification under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2+

CFO Certification under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1+

CEO Certification under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2+

CFO Certification under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
#    Management Compensation Plan
+    Included herewith.

 

29


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boulder, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, on the 1st day of November 2004.

 

Wild Oats Markets, Inc.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ Edward F. Dunlap                                    
Edward F. Dunlap
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

EX-10.1 2 exhibit101.htm EXHIBIT 10.1 Exhibit 10.1

Exhibit 10.1

 

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT

THIS RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made as of this _____ day of _____________, 200_, between Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and <<Name>> (the "Grantee").

RECITALS

1. As of <<Date_of_Grant>>, the Company grants (the "Grant") the Grantee Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs"), which are exchangeable for shares of Company common stock (the "Stock") under the Wild Oats Markets, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") according to the Distribution Election, a form of which is attached hereto, made by the Grantee and pursuant to this Agreement.

2. The Company and the Grantee wish to provide for the grant of the RSUs on the terms and conditions set forth below. RSUs shall only be available to non-employee members ("Directors") of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Company.

AGREEMENT

1. Grant of RSUs.

(a) Pursuant to the Plan and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Company hereby grants to the Grantee _____ RSUs effective as of _____________, 200_. The amount of RSUs granted is based upon the following calculation (check all applicable):

___ Board meeting grant: $3,450 (115% of $3,000) divided by the fair market value ("FMV") as determined below, of the Stock on the NASDAQ National Market.

___ Committee meeting grant: $2,300 (115% of $2,000) divided by the FMV of the Stock on the NASDAQ National Market.

___ Annual service grant: 4,000 RSUs granted each year for service on the Board.

___ Other: ____________________________________________________________________

(b) In the event of a Grant, the FMV of the Stock shall be determined with reference to the closing price of the Stock as of last day of each board meeting. In the event a board meeting adjourns on a day during which the Stock is not traded, FMV shall be determined with reference to the closing price of the Stock on the last trading day immediately preceding the last day of the board meeting. In all other events, the FMV of the Stock shall be determined with reference to the closing price on the day prior to the determination of FMV.

(c) All fractional shares shall be rounded down.

2. Vesting.

(a) All RSUs will be vested on the date of grant, other than those granted for annual service on the Board, which shall vest on the one year anniversary of the Grant. If the Grantee is not a Director on the one-year anniversary of the Grant and the Grant is not otherwise vested under this Agreement, then the Grant shall be null and void.

(b) All units will vest upon a Change-in-Control as defined in paragraph 2(c) below.

(c) A "Change in Control" shall be deemed to have occurred if an event set forth in any one of the following paragraphs shall have occurred:

(i) any person who is or who becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person or any securities acquired directly from the Company or its affiliates) representing 31% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities, excluding any person who becomes a beneficial owner in connection with a non-control merger (as defined in paragraph (iii) below); or

(ii) the following individuals cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the number of Directors then serving: individuals who, on the date hereof, constitute the Board and any new Director (other than a Director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including but not limited to a consent solicitation, relating to the election of Directors of the Company) whose appointment or election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company's stockholders was approved or recommended by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors then still in office who either were Directors on the date hereof or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved or recommended; or;

(iii) A merger or consolidation of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company is consummated with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation (a non-control merger") immediately following which the individuals who comprise the Board immediately prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the board of Directors of the Company, the entity surviving such merger or consolidation or any parent thereof; or

(iv) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or an agreement is consummated for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company's assets, other than a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company's assets immediately following which the individuals who comprise the Board immediately prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the entity to which such assets are sold or disposed or any parent thereof.

(d) All RSUs shall vest upon the death or Disability (as that term is defined in Section 22(e) of the Internal Revenue Code) of the Grantee.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a "Change in Control" shall not be deemed to have occurred by virtue of the consummation of any transaction or series of integrated transactions immediately following which the record holders of the Stock immediately prior to such transaction or series of transactions continue to have substantially the same proportionate ownership in an entity which owns all or substantially all of the assets of the Company immediately following such transaction or series of transactions.

3. Payment for RSUs, Delivery of Stock Certificates. When the RSUs become payable, the RSUs shall be settled in shares of Stock in accordance with the Distribution Election made by the Director prior to the first receipt of RSUs under the Plan (the "Payment Date").

Notwithstanding any distribution election by the Grantee, in the case of death or Disability, as that term is defined in paragraph 2(d) above, of the Grantee, the RSUs shall be payable within thirty (30) days following death or determination of Disability. In the event the 30th day falls on a day during which the Stock is not traded, payment shall be made on the next trading day following the 30th day. Subject to the provisions of Section 7 below, stock certificates (the "Certificates") evidencing the Stock shall be issued to the Grantee as of the Payment Date and registered in the Grantee’s name on the records of the Company. Subject to and conditioned on the satisfaction of any withholding obligations, the Certificates shall be delivered to the Grantee as soon as practicable after the Payment Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if, at the time that payment is due under this Section 3, the Company’s deduction for compensation payable to the Grantee is subject to the restrictions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Section 162(m)"), payment shall not be made until the Company’s deduction for the compensation attributable to the payment is not limited by Section 162(m).

4. Dividend Equivalents. The Grantee shall be entitled to receive cash payments (referred to as dividend equivalents) equal to any cash dividends and other distributions paid in cash with respect to a corresponding number of shares of Stock.

5. Adjustments to the RSUs.

(a) Adjustment by Merger, Stock Split, Stock Dividend, etc. If the shares of Stock, as presently constituted, shall be changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares of Stock or other securities of the Company or of another corporation (whether by reason of merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, spin-off, combination of shares or otherwise), or if the number of shares of Stock shall be increased through the payment of a stock dividend, or if a dividend on the shares of Stock or rights or warrants to purchase securities of the Company shall be issued to holders of all outstanding Stock, then there shall be substituted for or added to each RSU, the number and kind of shares of Stock or other securities into which each outstanding share of Stock that may become payable with respect to the RSU shall be so changed or for which each share shall be exchanged or to which each share shall be entitled.

(b) Other distributions and changes in the Stock. In the event there shall be any other change in the number or kind of the outstanding shares of Stock, or any stock or other securities into which the Stock is changed or for which it is exchanged, then if the Board shall, in its sole discretion, determine the change, if any, required to the number of RSUs held by a Grantee or to which any Award granted under the Plan relates immediately prior to the making of such adjustment

6. Reorganization. The Board may also provide for the assumption or substitution of the RSUs by the surviving entity and make any other provision for the RSUs as the Board deems appropriate in its sole discretion. The Company, or any successor or purchaser of the Company, as the case may be, shall make adequate provision for the assumption of the RSUs or the substitution of new RSUs for the outstanding RSUs on terms comparable to the terms of this Agreement.

7. Withholding. In the event the Grantee is subject, in the exclusive judgment of the Company, to withholding, the Grantee shall make appropriate arrangements with the Company to make payment to the Company of the amount required to be withheld under applicable federal, state, local, and other tax laws (collectively, "Withholding Taxes"). The Grantee may elect to pay such Withholding Taxes in cash by delivering to the Company a check payable to the order of the Company or, if the Company agrees, by authorizing the Company to withhold the amount due from the Grantee’s pay during the pay periods immediately preceding and following the date on which any such Withholding Tax liability arises. If the Withholding Taxes arise on or after the date the RSUs become payable, the Grantee may, in addition to the methods described in the preceding sentence, elect to pay such Withholding Taxes (a) by selling a portion of the Stock then payable under this Agreement if otherwise permitted by this Agreement or (b) by having the Company withhold from the shares otherwise payable and deliverable to the Grantee a number of shares having a FMV equal to the amount of the minimum required Withholding Taxes, or such lesser amount as the Grantee may elect. In such cases, the value of the shares to be withheld shall be based on the FMV of the shares on the date the amount of Withholding Taxes is determined (the "Tax Date"). The Grantee must make an irrevocable election of the manner of payment of the Withholding Taxes no later that fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the Tax Date; provided however, if the Grantee is subject to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the election shall be made in accordance with the requirements of Rule 16b-3. If, on and after the time the RSUs become payable, the Grantee has not made arrangements satisfactory to the Company to pay the Withholding Taxes, the Company shall withhold from the shares, a number of shares having a FMV equal to the amount required to pay the Withholding Taxes. The value of the shares to be withheld shall be based on the FMV of the shares on the Tax Date. The Company shall not deliver any shares of Stock unless and until the Grantee has delivered to the Company, or has made arrangements satisfactory to the Company to provide fully for, the required Withholding Taxes.

8. Restriction on Transferability. RSUs, whether or not vested, may not be sold, assigned, transferred by gift or otherwise, pledged or hypothecated, or otherwise disposed of, by operation of law or otherwise at any time, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

9. No Rights as a Stockholder. The Grantee shall have no voting or any other rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the RSUs. Upon payment of the RSUs and the transfer of shares of Stock to the Grantee, the Grantee shall have all of the rights of a stockholder of the Company. The Grantee’s right to receive Stock under this Agreement shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company.

10. Miscellaneous.

(a) Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by the Board. Any determination by the Board shall be final and binding on all parties.

(b) Notices. Any notice required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by first class registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, or by personal delivery to the appropriate party, addressed:

(i) If to the Company, to Director of Compensation, 3375 Mitchell Lane, Boulder, CO 80301, with a copy to General Counsel at the same address, or at any other address as may have been furnished to the Grantee in writing by the Company; or

(ii) If to the Grantee, to the Grantee at the address set forth below under the signature line, or at other address as may have been furnished to the Company by the Grantee.

Any such notice shall be deemed to have been given as of the second day after deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, properly addressed as set forth above, in the case of mailed notice, or as of the date delivered in the case of personal delivery.

(c) Amendment. Except as provided herein, this Agreement may not be amended or otherwise modified unless evidenced in writing and signed by the Company and the Grantee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be amended in the sole discretion of the Board by a writing that states specifically it is amending this Agreement if a copy of the amendment is delivered to the Grantee; provided, however, no amendment may adversely affect the rights of the Grantee without the Grantee’s written consent. Without limiting the foregoing, the Board reserves the right to change, by written notice to the Grantee, the provisions of the RSUs in any way it may deem necessary or advisable to implement the purposes of the grant and this Agreement as a result of any change in applicable laws and regulations or any future law, regulation, ruling, or judicial decision, provided any change shall be applicable only to RSUs that are then subject to the restrictions provided in this Agreement.

(d) Defined Terms. Capitalized terms shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan or herein.

(e) Construction; Severability. The section headings contained herein are for reference purposes only and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, and each other provision of this Agreement shall be severable and enforceable to the extent permitted by law.

(f) Waiver. Any provision contained in this Agreement may be waived, either generally or in any particular instance, by the Board appointed under the Plan, but only to the extent permitted under the Plan.

(g) Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Company and the Grantee and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors and assigns.

(h) Rights to Employment. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as giving the Grantee any right to be retained on the Board or any committee of the Board of the Company and this Agreement is limited solely to governing the rights and obligations of the Grantee with respect to the RSUs.

(i) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado.

 

 

 

 

 

[REST OF THE PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

Wild Oats Markets, Inc.

By: ________________________________

 

 

GRANTEE

_______________________________________

Print Name: ______________________________

Address: ________________________________

________________________________

________________________________

 

 

 

EX-10.2 3 exhibit102.htm EXHIBIT 10.2 Exhibit 10.2

Exhibit 10.2

 

 

***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

THIRD AMENDMENT TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment"), dated as of November 4, 2004, is entered into by and among:

(1) WILD OATS MARKETS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower");

(2) Each of the financial institutions listed in Schedule I to the Credit Agreement referred to in Recital A below (collectively, the "Lenders") constituting Required Lenders; and

(3) WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association ("WFB"), as the administrative agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the "Administrative Agent").

 

RECITALS

A. The Borrower, the Lenders, the Administrative Agent and WFB in its capacity as L/C Issuer and Swing Line Lender are parties to that certain Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2003 (as amended by that certain First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 21, 2004 and as further amended by that certain Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 3, 2004, the "Credit Agreement").

B. The Borrower has requested that the Lenders constituting Required Lenders and the Administrative Agent amend the Credit Agreement in certain respects.

C. The Lenders executing this Amendment and the Administrative Agent are willing to so amend the Credit Agreement upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth below.

 

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Borrower, the Lenders executing this Amendment and the Administrative Agent hereby agree as follows:

 

1. Definitions, Interpretation. All capitalized terms defined above and elsewhere in this Amendment shall be used herein as so defined. Unless otherwise defined herein, all other capitalized terms used herein shall have the respective meanings given to those terms in the Credit Agreement, as amended by this Amendment. The rules of construction set forth in Article I of the Credit Agreement shall, to the extent not inconsistent with the terms of this Amendment, apply to this Amendment and are hereby incorporated by reference.

 

2


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

 

2. Amendments to Credit Agreement. Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth in paragraph 4 below, the Credit Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

a) Section 1.01 is hereby amended by changing the definitions of the terms "Cash Balances", "Cash Equivalents", "Adjusted Leverage Ratio" and "Pricing Grid" to read in their entirety as follows:

"Cash Balances" shall mean, with respect to Borrower and its Subsidiaries at any time, the remainder, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, of:

(a) The sum of (i) the unrestricted cash of Borrower and its Subsidiaries (including cash restricted by a Lien in favor of the Administrative Agent for the benefit of the Lenders pursuant to this Agreement) maintained in one or more deposit accounts located at a Lender (or in transit to such deposit accounts so long as the amounts in transit relate to credit card payments owed to the Borrower or its Subsidiaries and the actual time in transit does not exceed three (3) Business Day) at such time and (ii) the market value of the unrestricted Cash Equivalents of Borrower and its Subsidiaries (including cash restricted by a Lien in favor of the Administrative Agent for the benefit of the Lenders pursuant to this Agreement) maintained in one or more securities accounts at a Lender or any Affiliate of a Lender at such time;

minus

(b) The Effective Amount of all Loans and L/C Obligations then outstanding under this Agreement.

"Cash Equivalents" shall mean:

(a) Direct obligations of, or obligations the principal and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by, the United States of America or obligations of any agency of the United States of America, in each case maturing within one year from the date of acquisition thereof;

(b) time deposits, certificates of deposit or bankers’ acceptances, in each case maturing within one year from the date of acquisition thereof and issued by a commercial bank or trust company organized under the laws of the United States of America or a state thereof or that is a Lender, provided that (i) such deposits are denominated in Dollars or Canadian Dollars and (ii) such bank or trust company has capital, surplus and undivided profits of not less than $100,000,000 at the time of acquisition thereof;

(c) Open market commercial paper maturing within 270 days from the date of acquisition thereof issued by a corporation organized under the laws of the United States of America or a state thereof, provided such commercial paper is rated at least A-1 (or its equivalent) by Standard and Poor’s Ratings Group or P-1 (or its equivalent) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. at the time of acquisition thereof;

 

3


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

 

(d) Repurchase obligations with a term of not more than 30 days for underlying securities of the types described in clause (a) above entered into with any bank meeting the qualifications specified in clause (b) above at the time of acquisition thereof;

(e) Securities with a maturities of one year or less from the date of acquisition issued or fully guaranteed by any state or commonwealth of the United States of America, or by any political subdivision or taxing authority thereof and rated at least Aa (or its equivalent) by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or AA (or its equivalent) by Standard and Poor’s Rating Group; and

(f) Investments in money market or mutual funds that invest exclusively in the foregoing items.

"Adjusted Leverage Ratio" shall mean:

As of any date of determination, the ratio of (a) the sum of (i) Average Total Funded Debt as of that date plus (ii) six (6) times Net Rents for the four Fiscal Quarter period most recently ended minus (iii) the unrestricted cash of Borrower and its Subsidiaries (including cash restricted by a Lien in favor of the Administrative Agent for the benefit of the Lenders pursuant to this Agreement) maintained in one or more deposit accounts located at a Lender (or in transit to such deposit accounts so long as the amounts in transit relate to credit card payments owed to the Borrower or its Subsidiaries and the actual time in transit does not exceed three (3) Business Day) as of that date minus (iv) the market value of the unrestricted Cash Equivalents of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries (including cash restricted by a Lien in favor of the Administrative Agent for the benefit of the Lenders pursuant to this Agreement) maintained in one or more securities accounts at a Lender or any Affiliate of a Lender as of that date to (b) EBITDAR for the four Fiscal Quarter period most recently ended (excluding (i) any Executive Contract Expense for such period and (ii) Rental Expense for such period not otherwise constituting Net Rents).

"Pricing Grid" shall mean:

Pricing Grid
(rates are expressed in basis points per annum)
Tier Adjusted Leverage Ratio Applicable Margin for LIBOR Loans (bps) Applicable Margin for Base Rate Loans (bps) Commitment Fee (bps) Letter of Credit
Fee (bps)
1 < 4.50 225.0 100.0 62.5 120.0
2 > 4.50 < 5.00 250.0 100.0 62.5 125.0
3 >5.00 275.0 125.0 75.0 125.0

 

 

 

4


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

 

Any increase or decrease in the Applicable Margin resulting from a change in the Adjusted Leverage Ratio shall become effective as of the fifth (5th) day following the final day by which a Compliance Certificate is required to be delivered pursuant to Section 5.01(a) (regardless of when actually delivered); provided, however, that if the Borrower fails to deliver a Compliance Certificate for a Fiscal Quarter when due in accordance with such Section, then Tier 3 shall apply (or shall continue to apply) as of the fifth (5th) day following such failure. The Applicable Margin in effect from November 4, 2004 until the first day of the Fiscal Quarter following the Borrower’s delivery of its Compliance Certificate for the Fiscal Quarter ending on January 1, 2005 shall be determined based upon Tier 3.

b) Section 5.01(a) is hereby amended by (i) deleting the "and" appearing at the end of clause (xiii), (ii) re-numbering clause (xiv) thereof as clause (xv) and (iii) adding a new clause (xiv) to read in its entirety as follows:

(xiv) As soon as possible and in no event later than twenty (20) days after the end of each month, copies of all recent bank and brokerage statements evidencing the Borrower’s compliance with the minimum cash balances covenant set forth in Section 5.03(f) hereof; and

c) Section 5.02(a) is hereby amended to change clause (x) thereof to read in its entirety as follows:

(x) Acquisition-Related Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $5,000,000 at any one time outstanding;

d) Section 5.02(d) is hereby amended to change clause (iv)(B) thereof to read in its entirety as follows:

(B) The aggregate consideration paid by the Loan Parties for all such Acquisitions (excluding consideration consisting of the Equity Securities of the Borrower or its Subsidiaries or of Net Cash Issuance Proceeds) paid does not exceed $5,000,000; and

e) Section 5.02(f) is hereby amended by (i) deleting clause (v) thereof in its entirety, (ii) adding the word "and" at the end of clause (iii) thereof, and (iii) amending clause (iv) thereof to read in its entirety as follows:

(iv) The Borrower may repurchase shares of capital stock owned by Perry D. Odak in an aggregate amount not to exceed, during the term of this Agreement, the outstanding principal amount of the Executive Note (plus any interest accrued thereon), so long as (the consideration given by the Borrower for such shares consists only of a non-cash charge related to the forgiveness of all or any portion of the indebtedness arising under the Executive Note.

 

 

5


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

 

f) Section 5.02(f) is hereby further amended by deleting the words "and (v)" appearing in the proviso at the end of such section and inserting the word "and" in front of the reference to "(iv)" therein.

g) Section 5.03(a) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

(a) Adjusted Leverage Ratio. The Borrower shall not permit the Adjusted Leverage Ratio as at the end of any Fiscal Quarter to be greater than the following for the respective periods set forth below:

 

Period

Adjusted Leverage Ratio

Closing Date to and including
March 27, 2004

3.75:1.00

March 28, 2004 to and including June 26, 2004

4.75:1.00

June 27, 2004 to and including
July 2, 2005

5.60:1:00

July 3, 2005 and any time
thereafter

5.25:1.00

h) Section 5.03(b) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

(b) Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. The Borrower shall not permit the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (i) as at the end of any Fiscal Quarter through the Fiscal Quarter ending on July 2, 2005 to be less than 1.00:1.00 and (ii) as at the end of any Fiscal Quarter thereafter, 1.05:1.00.

 

 

6


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

 

i) Section 5.03(d) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

(d) New Leases. The Borrower shall not permit the aggregate amount of New Leases for New Stores (excluding relocations of existing Stores) entered into by the Loan Parties to be greater than the following amounts for the respective periods set forth below:

 

Period

Maximum

Fiscal Year 2004

[CONFIDENTIAL]

Fiscal Year 2005

[CONFIDENTIAL])

Fiscal Year 2006

[CONFIDENTIAL])

 

j) Section 5.03(e) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

(e) Capital Expenditures. The Borrower shall not permit the aggregate amount of Capital Expenditures made by the Loan Parties in any Fiscal Year to be greater than the following amounts for the respective Fiscal Years set forth below:

 

Fiscal Year

Maximum Amount

2004

[CONFIDENTIAL]

2005 and each Fiscal Year thereafter

[CONFIDENTIAL]

______________________________________

(1)  Confidential treatment has been requested for the redacted portion. The confidential, redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC.

(2)  Confidential treatment has been requested for the redacted portion. The confidential, redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC.

(3)  Confidential treatment has been requested for the redacted portion. The confidential, redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC.

(4)  Confidential treatment has been requested for the redacted portion. The confidential, redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC.

(5)  Confidential treatment has been requested for the redacted portion. The confidential, redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC.

 

 

7


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

 

k) Section 5.03(f) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

(f) Cash Balances. Borrower shall not permit at any time through the Maturity Date the Cash Balances of Borrower and its Subsidiaries to be less than (i) at all times on or prior to July 2, 2005, $25,000,000, and (ii) at all times thereafter, $10,000,000.

l) Schedule 4.01(l) is hereby amended by adding thereto the new text set forth on Attachment A hereto.

m) Schedule 4.01(n) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as set forth on Attachment B hereto.

n) Clause 3(b) of Exhibit A to the Credit Agreement (the form of Notice of Revolving Loan Borrowing) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

(b) No Default has occurred and is continuing or will result from such Revolving Loan Borrowing;

o) Clause 3(b) of Exhibit D to the Credit Agreement (the form of Notice of Swing Line Borrowing) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

(b) No Default has occurred and is continuing or will result from such Swing Line Borrowing;

p) Exhibit N of the Credit Agreement (the form of Compliance Certificate) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as set forth on Attachment C hereto.

 

3. Representations and Warranties. The Borrower hereby represents and warrants to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders that the following are true and correct on the date of this Amendment and that, after giving effect to the amendments set forth in paragraph 2 above, the following will be true and correct on the Effective Date:

a) The representations and warranties of the Borrower set forth in Article IV of the Credit Agreement and in the other Credit Documents are true and correct in all material respects as if made on such date (except for representations and warranties expressly made as of a specified date, which are true and correct in all material respects as of such date);

b) No Default has occurred and is continuing; and

c) The Credit Agreement, the Security Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and the Guaranty are in full force and effect.

 

 

8


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

 

4. Effective Date. The amendments effected by paragraph 2 above shall become effective as of November 4, 2004 (the "Effective Date"), subject to receipt by the Lenders executing this Amendment and the Administrative Agent of this Amendment duly executed by the Borrower, the Lenders constituting Required Lenders and the Administrative Agent, each in form and substance satisfactory to the Lenders executing this Amendment, the Administrative Agent and their respective counsel, as applicable:

a) This Amendment duly executed by the Borrower, the Lenders constituting Required Lenders and the Administrative Agent;

b) A letter in the form of Attachment D hereto appropriately completed and duly executed by each Guarantor (the "Guarantor Consent Letter");

c) An updated Collateral Certificate, appropriately completed as of the date hereof and duly executed by the Borrower;

d) A certificate of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary (or comparable officer) of the Borrower, dated the Effective Date, certifying that (i) the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Borrower delivered to the Administrative Agent on the Closing Date and the effective date of the First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 21, 2004 (as applicable) have not been modified since such date and remain in full force and effect; and (ii) the resolutions of the board of directors of the Borrower which authorized the execution, delivery and on-going performance by the Borrower of its obligations under the Credit Agreement (as amended from time to time) remain in full force and effect;

e) A certificate of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary (or comparable officer) of each Guarantor, dated the Effective Date, certifying (i) the certificate of incorporation, articles of incorporation, certificate of limited partnership, articles of organization or comparable document of such Guarantor and the bylaws, partnership agreement, limited liability company agreement or comparable document of such Guarantor, in each case delivered to the Administrative Agent on the Closing Date have not been modified since the Closing Date and remain in full force and effect; and (ii) the resolutions of the board of directors or other governing body of such Guarantor (or other comparable enabling action) which authorized the execution, delivery and on-going performance by such Guarantor of its obligations under the Guaranty remain in full force and effect;

f) Favorable written opinion of Freya R. Brier, Esq., general counsel to the Borrower, dated the Effective Date, addressed to the Administrative Agent for the benefit of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders and covering such legal matters as the Administrative Agent may reasonably request and otherwise in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent; and

g) Such other evidence as the Administrative Agent or any Lender may reasonably request to establish the accuracy and completeness of the representations and warranties and the compliance with the terms and conditions contained in this Amendment and the other Credit Documents.

 

 

9


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

 

5. Post-Effective Date Covenant. The continuing effectiveness of the amendments set forth in paragraph 2 shall be subject to the receipt on or before November 9, 2004 by the Administrative Agent on behalf of each Lender that executes this Amendment on or prior to November 8, 2004, of a non-refundable amendment fee in the amount of 0.20% of such Lender’s respective Commitment. The Borrower agrees that the failure to such amendment fee on or before November 9, 2004 result in the occurrence of an Event of Default.

 

6. Effect of this Amendment. On and after the Effective Date, each reference in the Credit Agreement and the other Credit Documents to the Credit Agreement shall mean the Credit Agreement as amended hereby. Except as specifically amended above, (a) the Credit Agreement and the other Credit Documents shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed and (b) the execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment shall not, except as expressly provided herein, operate as a waiver of any right, power, or remedy of the Lenders or Agent, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Credit Agreement or any other Credit Document.

 

7. Miscellaneous.

a) Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of identical counterparts, any set of which signed by all the parties hereto shall be deemed to constitute a complete, executed original for all purposes.

b) Headings. Headings in this Amendment are for convenience of reference only and are not part of the substance hereof.

c) Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado without reference to conflicts of law rules.

 

 

10


***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and the Lenders executing this Amendment have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

 

BORROWER: WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.

 

By: /s/

Name: Freya R. Brier

Title: Sr. Vice President

 

 

ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION

 

By: /s/

Name: Marc Rosenberg

Title: Vice President

 

By:

Name:

Title:

 

 

LENDERS: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION

 

By: /s/

Name: Marc Rosenberg

Title: Vice President

 

By:

Name:

Title:

 

 

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

 

By:

Name:

Title:

 

By:

Name:

Title:

 

VECTRA BANK COLORADO N.A.

 

By: /s/

Name: Steven Griffith

Title: Sr. Vice President

 

By:

Name:

Title:

 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

 

By:

Name:

Title:

 

By:

Name:

Title:

EX-31.1 4 exhibit311.htm EXHIBIT 31.1 Exhibit 31.1

 

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Perry D. Odak, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2004, of Wild Oats Markets, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

.

c)

Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: November 1, 2004

/s/ Perry D. Odak

Perry D. Odak

 

 

EX-31.2 5 exhibit312.htm EXHIBIT 31.2 Exhibit 31.2

 

 

 

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Edward F. Dunlap, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2004, of Wild Oats Markets, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 1, 2004

/s/ Edward F. Dunlap

Edward F. Dunlap

 

EX-32.1 6 exhibit321.htm EXHIBIT 32.1 Exhibit 32.1

 

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the report of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine month ended September 25, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Perry D. Odak hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)

the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/ Perry D. Odak

Perry D. Odak,

November 1, 2004

 

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and will be retained by Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

EX-32.2 7 exhibit322.htm EXHIBIT 32.2 Exhibit 32.2

 

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the report of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended September 25, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Edward F. Dunlap hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/ Edward F. Dunlap

Edward F. Dunlap,

November 1, 2004

 

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and will be retained by Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----