-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, KbKRNz7qdPU/ujx8igoEu4P+VO9W9O/QWRgWbrGNu+KVzbiKpCq0WUoMSvOKTDIR nKQkyXPDhf50wLmK2S0eeg== 0001206774-08-000379.txt : 20080227 0001206774-08-000379.hdr.sgml : 20080227 20080227161320 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001206774-08-000379 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 9 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20071231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20080227 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20080227 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: LINCARE HOLDINGS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000882235 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-MISC HEALTH & ALLIED SERVICES, NEC [8090] IRS NUMBER: 510331330 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-19946 FILM NUMBER: 08646743 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 19387 US 19 NORTH CITY: CLEARWATER STATE: FL ZIP: 33764 BUSINESS PHONE: 8135307700 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 19387 US 19 NORTH CITY: CLEARWATER STATE: FL ZIP: 33764 10-K 1 lincareholdings_10k.htm ANNUAL REPORT

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark one)

x       ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
 
 OR 
 
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ____________

Commission File Number 0-19946

Lincare Holdings Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 Delaware   51-0331330 
 (State or other jurisdiction   (I.R.S. Employer 
 of incorporation or organization)   Identification Number) 
 19387 US 19 North   
 Clearwater, Florida   33764 
 (Address of principal executive office)   (Zip Code) 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(727) 530-7700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share

     Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes x    No o

     Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o    No x

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x    No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  x  Accelerated filer  o 
 
Non-accelerated filer  o  Smaller reporting company  o 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).  Yes  o   No  x

     The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on a $39.85 closing sale price of the common stock on June 29, 2007, as reported on the NASDAQ National Market System, was approximately $3,362,221,132.

     As of January 31, 2008, there were 73,189,060 outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01, which is the only class of capital stock of the registrant outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     Certain information called for by Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Lincare Holdings Inc., which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2007.


Table of Contents

LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-K
For The Year Ended December 31, 2007
INDEX

      Page
PART I.
Item 1. Business 1
Item 1A. Risk Factors 9
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 15
Item 2. Properties 15
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 15
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 15
PART II.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 16
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 18
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 19
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 29
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 29
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 29
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 29
Item 9B. Other Information 31
PART III.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 32
Item 11. Executive Compensation 32
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 32
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 32
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 32
PART IV.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 33
Signatures 34
Index of Exhibits S-2


PART I

Item 1. Business

General

     Lincare Holdings Inc., together with its subsidiaries (“Lincare,” the “Company,” “we” or “our”), is one of the nation’s largest providers of oxygen and other respiratory therapy services to patients in the home. Our customers typically suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”), such as emphysema, chronic bronchitis or asthma, and require supplemental oxygen or other respiratory therapy services in order to alleviate the symptoms and discomfort of respiratory dysfunction. Lincare currently serves nearly 700,000 customers in 47 states through 1,019 operating centers. Lincare Holdings Inc. is a Delaware corporation.

The Home Respiratory Market

     We estimate that the home respiratory market (including home oxygen equipment and respiratory therapy services) represents in excess of $6.0 billion in annual sales, with growth estimated at approximately 6% per year. This growth reflects the significant increase in the number of persons afflicted with COPD, which is largely attributable to the increasing proportion of the U.S. population over the age of 65 years. Growth in the home respiratory market is further driven by the continued trend toward treatment of patients in the home as a lower cost alternative to the acute care setting.

Business Strategy

     Our strategy is to increase our market share through internal growth and strategic business acquisitions. Lincare achieves internal growth in existing geographic markets through the addition of new customers and referral sources to our network of local operating centers. In addition, we expand into new geographic markets on a selective basis, either through acquisitions or by opening new operating centers, when we believe such expansion will enhance our business. In 2007, Lincare acquired three local and regional companies with operations in multiple states. These acquisitions expanded our presence in states where we had existing locations.

     Revenue growth is dependent upon the overall growth rate of the home respiratory market and on our ability to increase market share through effective delivery of high quality equipment and services and selective business acquisitions. Continued cost containment efforts by government and private insurance reimbursement programs have created an increasingly competitive environment, accelerating consolidation trends within the home health care industry.

     We will continue our focus on providing oxygen and other respiratory therapy services to patients in the home and to provide home medical equipment and other services where we believe such services will enhance our primary business. In 2007, oxygen and other respiratory therapy services accounted for approximately 92.1% of Lincare’s net revenues.

Products and Services of Lincare

     Lincare primarily provides oxygen and other respiratory therapy services to patients in the home. We also provide a variety of durable medical equipment (“DME”) and home infusion therapies in certain geographic markets. When a physician, hospital discharge planner, or other source refers a patient to one of our operating centers, our customer representative obtains the necessary medical and insurance coverage information, assignment of benefits to Lincare, and coordinates the delivery of patient care. The prescribed therapy is delivered by one of our service representatives or clinicians at the customer’s home, where instruction and training are provided to the customer and the customer’s family regarding appropriate equipment use and maintenance and compliance with the prescribed therapy. Following the initial setup, our service representatives and/or clinicians make periodic visits to the customer’s home, the frequency of which is dictated by the type of therapy prescribed and physician orders. All services and equipment provided by Lincare are coordinated with the prescribing physician. During the period that we provide services and equipment for a customer, the customer remains under the physician’s care and medical supervision. We employ respiratory therapists, nurses and other qualified clinicians to perform certain training and other functions in connection with our services. Clinicians are licensed where required by applicable law.

     The principal products and services provided by Lincare are:

     Home Oxygen Equipment. The major types of oxygen delivery equipment are oxygen concentrators and liquid oxygen systems. Each method of delivery has different characteristics that make it more or less suitable to specific customer applications.

1


·   Oxygen concentrators are stationary units that provide a continuous flow of oxygen by filtering ordinary room air. Customers most commonly use concentrators as their primary source of stationary oxygen. These systems are often supplemented with portable gaseous oxygen cylinders or liquid oxygen systems to meet the ambulatory or emergency needs of the customer.

·   Liquid oxygen systems are thermally insulated containers of liquid oxygen, generally consisting of a stationary unit and a portable unit, which are most commonly used by customers with significant ambulatory requirements.

     Other Respiratory Therapy. Other respiratory therapy services offered by Lincare include the following:

·   Nebulizers and associated respiratory medications provide aerosol therapy for customers suffering from COPD and asthma.

·   Continuous positive airway pressure devices maintain open airways in customers suffering from obstructive sleep apnea by providing airflow at prescribed pressures during sleep.

·   Non-invasive ventilation provides nocturnal ventilatory support for customers with neuromuscular disease and COPD. This therapy improves daytime function and decreases incidence of acute illness.

·   Ventilators support respiratory function in severe cases of respiratory failure where the customer can no longer sustain the mechanics of breathing without the assistance of a machine.

     Home Infusion Therapy. In certain geographic markets, Lincare provides a variety of home infusion therapies, including parenteral nutrition, intravenous antibiotic therapy, enteral nutrition, chemotherapy, dobutamine infusions, immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy, continuous pain management and central catheter management.

     Lincare also supplies home medical equipment, such as hospital beds, wheelchairs and other supplies that may be required by our customers.

     Company Operations

     Management. We maintain a decentralized approach to management of our local business operations. Decentralization of managerial decision-making enables our operating centers to respond promptly and effectively to local market demands and opportunities. We believe that the personalized nature of customer requirements and referral relationships characteristic of the home health care business mandate that we maintain a localized operating structure.

     Each of our 1,019 operating centers is managed by a center manager who is responsible and accountable for the operating and financial performance of the center. Service and marketing functions are performed at the local operating level, while strategic development, financial control and operating policies are administered at the corporate level. Reporting mechanisms are in place at the operating center level to monitor performance and ensure field accountability.

     A team of area managers directly supervises individual operating center managers, serving as an additional mechanism for assessing and improving performance of our operations. Lincare’s operating centers are served by regional billing centers, which control all of our billing and reimbursement functions.

     MIS Systems. We believe that our proprietary management information systems are one of our key competitive advantages. The systems provide management with critical information on a timely basis to measure and evaluate performance levels company-wide. Management reviews monthly reports, including revenues and profitability by individual center, accounts receivable and cash collection performance, equipment controls and utilization, customer activity and manpower trends. We have an in-house staff of computer programmers, which enables us to continually enhance our computer systems in order to provide timely financial and operational information and to respond promptly to changes in reimbursement regulations and policies.

     Our billing system has both manual and computerized functions and processes that are designed to maintain the integrity of revenue and accounts receivable. Third-party payors, such as Medicare, that can accommodate electronic claims submission are billed electronically on a daily basis from our central computer system. Paper claims and invoices are generated and billed to various state Medicaid agencies, commercial payors and individual customers when electronic billing is unavailable. Electronic billing expedites the billing process and generally allows us to receive payment more quickly. The medical billing process requires the collection of various paper documents from customers and referral sources. Information such as customer demographics, insurance coverage and verification, prescriptions from physicians, delivery receipts, billing authorizations and assignments of benefits to Lincare, is gathered at the local operating centers and forwarded to our regional billing offices for review and manual input into our billing system. Item codes within the system representing specific products supplied to customers are matched against the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (“HCPCS”) for verification and accuracy of billing codes. Price tables within the system containing expected allowable payment amounts are manually input into the system and updated by the regional billing offices based on published Medicare and Medicaid fee schedules and bulletins, as well as contracts and supplier notifications from private insurance companies.

2


     Accounts Receivable Management. We derive a substantial majority of our revenue from reimbursement by third-party payors. We accept assignment of insurance benefits from customers and, in most instances, invoice and collect payments directly from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance carriers, as well as from customers under co-insurance provisions. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of our revenues derived from different types of payors.

      Year Ended December 31,
Payors   2007       2006       2005
Medicare and Medicaid programs 64 % 67 % 67 %
Private insurance 29   26     26
Direct payment   7   7 7
100 % 100 % 100 %

     Third-party reimbursement is a complicated process that involves submission of claims to multiple payors, each having its own specific claim requirements. To operate effectively in this environment, we have designed and implemented a proprietary computer system to decrease the time required for the submission and processing of third-party claims. Our systems are capable of tailoring the submission of claims to the specifications of individual payors. Our in-house information system capabilities also enable reimbursement or regulatory changes to be adjusted quickly. These features serve to decrease the processing time of claims for payment resulting in more rapid collection of accounts receivable.

     It is our policy to verify insurance benefits with the responsible third-party payor before or within 48 hours of delivery of products to customers. Medicare beneficiaries provide our service representatives with a Medicare identification card containing the beneficiary’s Health Identification Control Number (“HICN”) at the time of customer setup and delivery. The existence of an HICN indicates the beneficiary’s eligibility to receive benefits under the Medicare program for covered services. Medicare benefits are not separately verified with the applicable Medicare intermediaries.

     Medicare and most other government and commercial payors that provide coverage to Lincare’s customers include a 20 percent co-payment provision in addition to a nominal deductible. Co-payments are generally not collected at the time of service and are invoiced to the customer or applicable secondary payor (supplemental providers of insurance coverage) on a monthly billing cycle as products are provided. A majority of our customers maintain, or are entitled to, secondary or supplemental insurance benefits providing “gap” coverage of this co-payment amount. In the event coverage is denied by the third-party payor, the customer is ultimately responsible for all services rendered by Lincare.

Sales and Marketing

     Favorable trends affecting the U.S. population and home health care have created an environment that has produced increasing demand for the services provided by Lincare. The average age of the American population is increasing and, as a person ages, more health care services are generally required. Further, well-documented changes occurring in the health care industry show a trend toward home care rather than institutional care as a matter of patient preference and cost containment.

     Sales activities are generally carried out by our full-time sales representatives located at our local operating centers with assistance from our center managers. In addition to communicating the high quality of our equipment and services, our sales representatives are trained to provide information concerning the benefits of home respiratory care. Sales representatives are often licensed respiratory therapists who are highly knowledgeable in the provision of supplemental oxygen and other respiratory therapies.

     Lincare primarily acquires new customers through referrals. Our principal sources of referrals are physicians, hospital discharge planners, prepaid health plans, clinical case managers and nursing agencies. Our sales representatives maintain continual contact with these medical professionals.

     Lincare’s referral sources recognize our reputation for providing high-quality equipment and service and have historically provided a steady flow of customers. While we view our referral sources as fundamental to our business, no single referral source accounts for more than one percent of our revenues. Lincare has nearly 700,000 active customers, and the loss of any single referral source, customer or group of customers would not materially impact our business.

3


     Lincare has received accreditation from the Community Health Accreditation Program. Accreditation by a national accrediting body represents a marketing benefit to our operating centers and provides for a recognized quality assurance program. Provisions contained in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 will, once implemented, require home medical equipment providers to be accredited or licensed by independent agencies in order to participate in Medicare. Many private payors already require such accreditation.

Acquisitions

     In 2007, we acquired certain operating assets of three companies with operations in multiple states, resulting in the addition of one new operating center.

     In 2006, we acquired certain operating assets of 10 companies with operations in multiple states, resulting in the addition of 48 new operating centers.

Quality Control

     We are committed to providing consistently high-quality products and services. Our quality control procedures and training programs are designed to promote greater responsiveness and sensitivity to individual customer needs and to assure the highest level of quality and convenience to the customer and the referring physician. Licensed respiratory therapists, registered nurses and other clinicians provide professional health care support to our customers and assist in our sales and marketing efforts.

Suppliers

     We purchase oxygen and other respiratory equipment from a variety of suppliers. We are not dependent upon any single supplier and believe that our product needs can be met by an adequate number of various manufacturers.

Competition

     The home respiratory market is a fragmented and highly competitive industry that is served by Lincare, other national providers, and by our estimates, over 2,000 regional and local providers.

     Home respiratory companies compete primarily on the basis of service, not pricing, since reimbursement levels are established by fee schedules promulgated by Medicare or Medicaid or by the individual determinations of private insurance companies. Furthermore, marketing efforts by home respiratory companies are typically directed toward referral sources that generally do not share financial responsibility for the payment of services provided to customers. The relationships between a home respiratory company and its customers and referral sources are highly personal. There is no compelling incentive for either physicians or the patients to alter the relationship, so long as the home respiratory company is providing responsive, professional and high quality service.

Medicare Reimbursement

     As a provider of home oxygen and other respiratory therapy services to the home health care market, we participate in Medicare Part B, the Supplementary Medical Insurance Program, which was established by the Social Security Act of 1965. Providers of home oxygen and other respiratory therapy services have historically been heavily dependent on Medicare reimbursement due to the high proportion of elderly persons suffering from respiratory disease. Durable medical equipment (“DME”), including oxygen equipment, is traditionally reimbursed by Medicare based on fixed fee schedules.

     Recent legislation, including the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (“SCHIP Extension Act”), the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”) and the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (“MMA”), contain provisions that directly impact reimbursement for the primary respiratory and other DME products provided by Lincare. The SCHIP Extension Act will reduce Medicare reimbursement amounts for covered Part B drugs, including inhalation drugs that we provide, beginning April 1, 2008. DRA contains provisions that will negatively impact reimbursement for oxygen equipment beginning in 2009 and negatively impacted reimbursement for DME items subject to capped rental payments beginning in 2007. MMA significantly reduced reimbursement for inhalation drug therapies beginning in 2005, reduced payment amounts for five categories of DME, including oxygen, beginning in 2005, froze payment amounts for other covered DME items through 2007, established a competitive acquisition program for DME beginning in 2008, and implemented quality standards and accreditation requirements for DME suppliers. The SCHIP Extension Act, DRA and MMA provisions, when fully implemented, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

     On December 29, 2007, the SCHIP Extension Act became law. The SCHIP Extension Act further reduces Medicare reimbursement amounts for covered Part B drugs, including inhalation drugs that we provide, beginning April 1, 2008. The SCHIP Extension Act requires the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) to adjust the methodology used to determine Medicare payment amounts for inhalation drugs by using volume-weighted average selling prices (“ASP”) based on actual sales volumes rather than average sales prices. When

4


implemented on April 1, 2008, the new calculation methodology is expected to result in lower reimbursement amounts for inhalation drugs. The SCHIP Extension Act also specifically lowers reimbursement for the inhalation drug albuterol sulfate. The Congressional Budget Office (“CBO”) estimates that the provisions of the SCHIP Extension Act affecting Part B drug reimbursement will result in reductions in aggregate Medicare outlays for such drugs of $1.0 billion over five years and $2.6 billion over 10 years. CMS is expected to announce in March 2008 the payment rates to be in effect for the second quarter of 2008 under the new methodology. We can not determine the impact of such payment reductions on the Company’s business until CMS publishes the new quarterly reimbursement amounts for each specific inhalation drug provided by the Company. We can also not determine whether quarterly updates in ASP pricing data will continue to result in ongoing reductions in payment rates for inhalation drugs, and what impact such payment reductions could have on our business in the future.

     On February 1, 2006, Congress passed the DRA legislation. DRA contains provisions that will impact reimbursement for oxygen equipment and DME in 2007 and beyond. DRA changes the reimbursement methodology for oxygen equipment from continuous monthly payment for as long as the equipment is in use by a Medicare beneficiary, which includes payment for oxygen contents and maintenance of equipment, to a capped rental arrangement whereby payment for oxygen equipment (including portable oxygen equipment) may not extend over a period of continuous use of longer than 36 months. On the first day that begins after the 36th continuous month during which payment is made for the oxygen equipment, the supplier would transfer title of the equipment to the beneficiary. Separate payments for oxygen contents would continue to be made for the period of medical need beyond the 36th month. According to the legislation, additional payments for maintenance and service of the oxygen equipment would be made for parts and labor not covered by a supplier’s or manufacturer’s warranty. The oxygen provisions contained in DRA became effective on January 1, 2006. In the case of beneficiaries receiving oxygen equipment prior to the effective date, the 36-month period of continuous use began on January 1, 2006. Accordingly, the first month in which the new payment methodology will impact our net revenues is January 2009.

     Throughout the second half of 2007, Congress was considering legislation that would have included further reductions in payment amounts for certain classes of oxygen equipment. The resulting legislation, the SCHIP Extension Act, temporarily addressed a number of Medicare program issues. However, the SCHIP Extension Act did not contain any provisions affecting Medicare reimbursement for oxygen equipment. The SCHIP Extension Act prevents a 10.1 percent reduction in Medicare physician payments that was scheduled for 2008 and gives physicians a 0.5 percent increase through June 30, 2008. The 10.1 percent reduction in Medicare physician payments is driven by the statutory sustainable growth rate (“SGR”) formula, which is intended to control the growth in aggregate Medicare expenditures for physician services. The 109th session of Congress previously passed similar legislation to avert a reduction in Medicare physician payments in 2007. It is anticipated that Congress will revisit the issue of physician payment rates and other Medicare program issues in 2008 in an effort to extend SGR relief beyond June 30, 2008. It is possible that reimbursement changes for oxygen equipment could be reconsidered at that time. Additionally, the President’s 2008 fiscal year budget proposes a reduction in the maximum continuous oxygen equipment rental period from 36 months to 13 months. No further information on this proposal is available at this time and we cannot predict whether or not the proposal will be included in the final budget approved by Congress. Further reductions in Medicare reimbursement for oxygen equipment could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s net revenues, operating income, cash flows and financial position.

     On November 1, 2006, CMS published rule CMS-1304-F, describing the Medicare regulations, as interpreted by CMS, required to implement the DRA oxygen provisions. The rule codifies the new payment methodology and related provisions with respect to oxygen, including, but not limited to, defining the 36-month capped rental period of continuous use, transfer of title, payment for oxygen contents for beneficiary-owned oxygen equipment, payment for maintenance and servicing of oxygen equipment and procedures for replacement of beneficiary-owned equipment. The DRA oxygen provisions and related regulations represent a fundamental change in the Medicare payment system for oxygen. These provisions are complex, and are expected to result in profound changes in the provider-customer relationship for oxygen equipment and related services. The Company believes that the 36-month rental cap will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s net revenues, operating income, cash flows and financial position when it takes effect in 2009 and beyond.

     Included in rule CMS-1304-F are changes to the Medicare payment rates for oxygen and oxygen equipment that took effect on January 1, 2007. CMS is exercising its authority under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (“BBA”) to establish separate classes and monthly payment rates for oxygen. The rule establishes a new class and monthly payment amount for oxygen-generating portable equipment (“OGPE”), which includes oxygen transfilling equipment and portable oxygen concentrators. An OGPE add-on payment, applicable during the 36-month rental period, will be made for these systems in the amount of $51.63. Payments for the new OGPE add-on began on January 1, 2007 for new and existing oxygen users. CMS also increased the monthly payment amounts for portable oxygen contents for beneficiary-owned liquid or gaseous oxygen equipment from approximately $20.77 to $77.45. The increase in payments for portable oxygen contents became effective on January 1, 2007 for new and existing oxygen users. The BBA requires these changes to be budget neutral, and, accordingly, CMS reduced other

5


Medicare oxygen payment rates beginning in 2007. As a result, the monthly payment amount for stationary oxygen equipment is expected to change each year in order to offset the impact from changes in beneficiary utilization of OGPE equipment. For 2008, the payment rate for stationary oxygen equipment will increase from $198.40 to $199.28, which is expected to increase our net revenues and operating income by approximately $3.0 million in 2008. CMS previously published projected rates for 2008, 2009 and 2010 of $198.40, $193.21 and $189.39, respectively. CMS will revise payment rates in future years under the methodology specified in the rule based on actual OGPE use and updated data on the distribution of beneficiaries using oxygen equipment. To the extent that the Company’s distribution of oxygen equipment and oxygen contents in future years differs from that of the overall Medicare market, these future payment rate revisions may have a significant effect on the overall level of reimbursement for the Company’s oxygen business.

     DRA also changes the reimbursement methodology for items of DME in the capped rental payment category, including but not limited to such items as continuous positive airway pressure (“CPAP”) devices, certain respiratory assist devices, nebulizers, hospital beds and wheelchairs. For such items of DME, payment may not extend over a period of continuous use of longer than 13 months. The option for a supplier to retain ownership of the item after a 15-month rental period and receive semi-annual maintenance and service payments is eliminated. On the first day that begins after the 13th continuous month during which payment is made for the item, the supplier will transfer title of the item to the beneficiary. Additional payments for maintenance and service of the item will be made for parts and labor not covered by a supplier’s or manufacturer’s warranty. The DME capped rental provisions contained in DRA applied to items furnished for which the first rental month occurred on or after January 1, 2006. Accordingly, the first month in which the new payment methodology impacted our net revenues was February 2007.

     Included in rule CMS-1304-F is a discussion of the Medicare regulations, as interpreted by CMS, necessary to implement the DME capped rental changes contained in the DRA. In addition, on January 26, 2006, CMS announced a final rule revising the payment classification of certain respiratory assist devices (“RADs”). RADs with a backup rate feature were reclassified as capped rental DME items effective April 1, 2006, whereby payments to providers of such devices will cease after the 13th continuous month of rental. Prior to the rule, providers were paid a continuous monthly rental amount over the entire period of medical necessity. In cases where Medicare beneficiaries received the item prior to April 1, 2006, only the rental payments for months after the effective date count toward the 13-month cap. Accordingly, the first month in which the new payment methodology impacted our net revenues was May 2007. The Company estimates that the capped rental changes to DME and RADs reduced the Company’s net revenues and operating income by approximately $11.4 million in 2007 and will reduce net revenues and operating income in 2008 by approximately $22.1 million. In addition, the transfer of ownership provisions affecting Medicare capped rental equipment resulted in a reduction in the estimated useful lives of such equipment beginning in 2006 and a corresponding increase in depreciation expense. The Company will continue to evaluate its estimates of useful lives based on its experience with ownership transfers of capped rental equipment in future periods, which may result in further increases in depreciation expense in the future.

     On December 8, 2003, MMA was signed into law. The MMA legislation contains provisions that directly impact reimbursement for the primary respiratory and other DME products provided by Lincare. Among other things, MMA:

(1)       Significantly reduced reimbursement for inhalation drug therapies. Historically, prescription drug coverage under Medicare has been limited to drugs furnished incident to a physician’s services and certain self-administered drugs, including inhalation drug therapies. Prior to MMA, Medicare reimbursement for covered drugs, including the inhalation drugs that we provide, was limited to 95 percent of the published average wholesale price (“AWP”) for the drug. MMA established new payment limits and procedures for drugs reimbursed under Medicare Part B. Beginning in 2005, inhalation drugs furnished to Medicare beneficiaries are reimbursed at 106 percent of the volume-weighted average selling price (“ASP”) of the drug, as determined from data provided each quarter by drug manufacturers under a specific formula described in MMA. Implementation of the ASP-based reimbursement formula resulted in a dramatic reduction in payment rates for inhalation drugs. We can not determine whether quarterly updates in ASP pricing data submitted by drug manufacturers and adopted by CMS will continue to result in ongoing reductions in payment rates for inhalation drugs, and what impact such payment reductions could have on our business in the future. We can also not predict the impact on our business of changes to the ASP pricing methodology as required by the SCHIP Extension Act that would result in further reductions to inhalation drug payment rates. Such payment adjustments could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and operating results.

6



(2)       Establishes a competitive acquisition program for DME beginning in 2008. MMA instructs CMS to establish and implement programs under which competitive acquisition areas will be established throughout the United States for contract award purposes for the furnishing of competitively priced items of DME, including oxygen equipment. The program will be implemented in phases such that competition under the program will occur in ten of the largest metropolitan statistical areas (“MSAs”) in 2008, 80 of the largest MSAs in 2009, and additional areas after 2009. Items selected for competitive acquisition will be phased in first among the highest cost and highest volume items and services or those items and services that CMS determines have the largest savings potential. In carrying out such programs, CMS may exempt rural areas and areas with low-population density within urban areas that are not competitive, unless there is a significant national market through mail order for a particular item or service.
 

For each competitive acquisition area, CMS will conduct a competition under which providers will submit bids to supply certain covered items of DME. Successful bidders will be expected to meet certain program quality standards in order to be awarded a contract and only successful bidders can supply the covered items to Medicare beneficiaries in the acquisition area. The applicable contract award prices are expected to be less than would be paid under current Medicare fee schedules and contracts will be re-bid at least every three years. CMS will be required to award contracts to multiple entities submitting bids in each area for an item or service, but will have the authority to limit the number of contractors in a competitive acquisition area to the number needed to meet projected demand. CMS may use competitive bid pricing information to adjust the payment amount otherwise in effect for an area that is not a competitive acquisition area.

 

On April 2, 2007, CMS issued rule CMS-1270-F implementing the competitive bidding program in ten of the largest MSAs across the country, applying initially to ten categories of DME and medical supplies. CMS concluded the bidding process for the first round of MSAs in September 2007, and expects to announce winning suppliers early this year and to have payments under the program go into effect in July 2008. CMS expects to begin soliciting bids for the second round of 70 MSAs in the summer of 2008. We can not predict the outcome of the competitive bidding program on our business nor the Medicare payment rates that will be in effect in 2008 and beyond for the items subjected to competitive bidding.

     In January 2006, pursuant to the contracting reform provisions of MMA, CMS announced the selection of four specialty carriers, or DME Medicare Administrative Contractors (the “DME MACs”), to be responsible for the processing and payment of claims for DME items provided to Medicare Part B beneficiaries. The DME MACs replaced the four Durable Medical Equipment Regional Carriers (the “DMERCs”) pursuant to a transition schedule that began on July 1, 2006, with the final DME MAC transitioning on June 1, 2007. The transition of claims processing from the DMERCs to the DME MACs has caused disruptions in the payment of DME claims and is having a negative impact on the timing of collections of our accounts receivable.

     On February 13, 2006, a final rule governing CMS’s Inherent Reasonableness (“IR”) authority became effective. The IR rule establishes a process for adjusting fee schedule amounts for Medicare Part B services when existing payment amounts are determined to be either grossly excessive or deficient. The rule describes the factors that CMS or its contractors will consider in making such determinations and the procedures that will be followed in establishing new payment amounts. To date, no payment adjustments have occurred or been proposed as a result of the IR rule.

     The effectiveness of the IR rule itself does not trigger payment adjustments for any items or services. Nevertheless, the IR rule puts in place a process that eventually could have a significant impact on Medicare payments for our equipment and services. We can not predict whether CMS will exercise its IR authority with respect to payment for our equipment and services, or the effect that such payment adjustments would have on our financial position or operating results.

     Federal and state budgetary and other cost-containment pressures will continue to impact the home respiratory care industry. We can not predict whether new federal and state budgetary proposals will be adopted or the effect, if any, such proposals would have on our business.

Government Regulation

     The federal government and all states in which we currently operate regulate various aspects of our business. In particular, our operating centers are subject to federal laws regulating interstate motor-carrier transportation and covering the repackaging of oxygen. State laws also govern, among other things, pharmacies, nursing services, distribution of medical equipment and certain types of home health activities and apply to those locations involved in such activities. Certain of our employees are subject to state laws and regulations governing the ethics and professional practice of respiratory therapy, pharmacy and nursing.

     As a health care supplier, Lincare is subject to extensive government regulation, including numerous laws directed at preventing fraud and abuse and laws regulating reimbursement under various government programs. The marketing, billing, documenting and other practices of health care companies are all subject to government scrutiny. To ensure compliance with Medicare and other regulations, regional health insurance carriers often conduct audits and request customer records and other documents to support claims submitted for payment of services rendered to customers. Similarly, government agencies periodically open investigations and obtain information from health care providers

7


pursuant to the legal process. Violations of federal and state regulations can result in severe criminal, civil and administrative penalties and sanctions, including disqualification from Medicare and other reimbursement programs.

     Numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), govern the collection, dissemination, use and confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information. As part of Lincare’s provision of, and billing for, health care equipment and services, we are required to collect and maintain patient-identifiable health information. New health information standards, whether implemented pursuant to HIPAA, congressional action or otherwise, could have a significant effect on the manner in which we handle health care related data and communicate with payors, and the cost of complying with these standards could be significant. If we do not comply with existing or new laws and regulations related to patient health information, we could be subject to criminal or civil sanctions.

     Health care is an area of rapid regulatory change. Changes in the laws and regulations and new interpretations of existing laws and regulations may affect permissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business, and reimbursement amounts paid by federal, state and other third-party payors. We can not predict the future of federal, state and local regulation or legislation, including Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations. Future legislative and regulatory changes could have a material adverse impact on us.

Employees

     As of December 31, 2007, we had 9,450 employees. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe that the relations between our management and employees are good.

Environmental Matters

     We believe that we are currently in compliance, in all material respects, with applicable federal, state and local statutes and ordinances regulating the discharge of hazardous materials into the environment. We do not believe we will be required to expend any material amounts in order to remain in compliance with these laws and regulations or that such compliance will materially affect our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

Available Information

     We maintain an Internet website at http://www.lincare.com. Information contained therein is not incorporated by reference into this annual report, and information contained in the website should not be considered part of this annual report. We make available free of charge through our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We make these reports available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

     Materials filed by us with the SEC are also available to the public to read and copy at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are an electronic filer with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us, at http://www.sec.gov.

8


Item 1A. Risk Factors

Forward-Looking Statements

     Statements in this annual report concerning future results, performance or expectations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available to Lincare as of the date hereof and Lincare assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Lincare’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties contain terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue” or variations of these terms or other comparable terminology.

     Key factors that have an impact on Lincare’s ability to attain these estimates include potential reductions in reimbursement rates by government and third party payors, changes in reimbursement policies, the demand for Lincare’s products and services, the availability of appropriate acquisition candidates and Lincare’s ability to successfully complete and integrate acquisitions, efficient operations of Lincare’s existing and future operating facilities, regulation and/or regulatory action affecting Lincare or its business, economic and competitive conditions, access to borrowed and/or equity capital on favorable terms and other risks described below.

     In developing our forward-looking statements, we have made certain assumptions relating to reimbursement rates and policies, internal growth and acquisitions and the outcome of various legal and regulatory proceedings. If the assumptions we use differ materially from what actually occurs, then actual results could vary significantly from the performance projected in the forward-looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report.

Certain Risk Factors Relating to the Company’s Business

     We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks. The following discussion highlights some of these risks and others are discussed elsewhere in this report. These and other risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

A MAJORITY OF OUR CUSTOMERS HAVE PRIMARY HEALTH COVERAGE UNDER MEDICARE PART B, AND RECENTLY ENACTED AND FUTURE CHANGES IN THE REIMBURSEMENT RATES OR PAYMENT METHODOLOGIES UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM COULD MATERIALLY AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.

     As a provider of home oxygen and other respiratory therapy services for the home health care market, we have historically depended heavily on Medicare reimbursement as a result of the high proportion of elderly persons suffering from respiratory disease. Medicare Part B, the Supplementary Medical Insurance Program, provides coverage to eligible beneficiaries for DME, such as oxygen equipment, respiratory assistance devices, continuous positive airway pressure devices, nebulizers and associated inhalation medications, hospital beds and wheelchairs for the home setting. Approximately 70 percent of our customers have primary coverage under Medicare Part B. There are increasing pressures on Medicare to control health care costs and to reduce or limit reimbursement rates for home medical equipment and services. Medicare reimbursement is subject to statutory and regulatory changes, retroactive rate adjustments, administrative and executive orders and governmental funding restrictions, all of which could materially decrease payments to us for the services and equipment we provide.

     Recent legislation, including the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (“SCHIP Extension Act”), the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”) and the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (“MMA”), contain provisions that directly impact reimbursement for the primary respiratory and other DME products provided by Lincare. The SCHIP Extension Act will reduce Medicare reimbursement amounts for covered Part B drugs, including inhalation drugs that we provide, beginning April 1, 2008. DRA contains provisions that will negatively impact reimbursement for oxygen equipment beginning in 2009 and negatively impacted reimbursement for DME items subject to capped rental payments beginning in 2007. MMA significantly reduced reimbursement for inhalation drug therapies beginning in 2005, reduced payment amounts for five categories of DME, including oxygen, beginning in 2005, froze payment amounts for other covered DME items through 2007, established a competitive acquisition program for DME beginning in 2008, and implemented quality standards and accreditation requirements for DME suppliers. The SCHIP Extension Act, DRA and MMA provisions, when fully implemented, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. See “MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT” for a full discussion of the SCHIP Extension Act, DRA and MMA provisions.

9


A SIGNIFICANT PERCENTAGE OF OUR BUSINESS IS DERIVED FROM THE SALE AND RENTAL OF MEDICARE-COVERED OXYGEN AND DME ITEMS, AND RECENT LEGISLATIVE ACTS IMPOSE SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES IN THE MEDICARE PAYMENT METHODOLOGIES AND REDUCTIONS IN THE MEDICARE PAYMENT AMOUNTS FOR THESE ITEMS. FURTHERMORE, LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSIDERATION BY THE U.S. CONGRESS COULD IMPOSE EVEN DEEPER PAYMENT REDUCTIONS FOR MEDICARE-COVERED OXYGEN EQUIPMENT WHICH COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR NET REVENUES, OPERATING INCOME, CASH FLOWS AND FINANCIAL POSITION.

     DRA changes the reimbursement methodology for oxygen equipment from continuous monthly payment for as long as the equipment is in use by a Medicare beneficiary, which includes payment for oxygen contents and maintenance of equipment, to a capped rental arrangement whereby payment for oxygen equipment (including portable oxygen equipment) may not extend over a period of continuous use of longer than 36 months. On the first day that begins after the 36th continuous month during which payment is made for the oxygen equipment, the supplier would transfer title of the equipment to the beneficiary. Separate payments for oxygen contents would continue to be made for the period of medical need beyond the 36th month. According to the legislation, additional payments for maintenance and service of the oxygen equipment would be made for parts and labor not covered by a supplier’s or manufacturer’s warranty. The oxygen provisions contained in DRA became effective on January 1, 2006. In the case of beneficiaries receiving oxygen equipment prior to the effective date, the 36-month period of continuous use began on January 1, 2006. Accordingly, the first month in which the new payment methodology will impact our net revenues is January 2009.

     Throughout the second half of 2007, Congress was considering legislation that would have included further reductions in payment amounts for certain classes of oxygen equipment. The resulting legislation, the SCHIP Extension Act, was signed into law by the President of the United States on December 29, 2007, and temporarily addressed a number of Medicare program issues. However, the SCHIP Extension Act did not contain any provisions affecting Medicare reimbursement for oxygen equipment. The SCHIP Extension Act suspended a 10.1% reduction in Medicare physician payments that was scheduled for 2008 and gave physicians a 0.5% increase through June 30, 2008. The 10.1% reduction in Medicare physician payments was driven by the statutory sustainable growth rate (“SGR”) formula, which is intended to control the growth in aggregate Medicare expenditures for physician services. The 109th session of Congress previously passed similar legislation to avert a reduction in Medicare physician payments in 2007. It is anticipated that Congress will revisit the issue of physician payment rates and other Medicare program issues in 2008 and consider whether to extend SGR relief beyond June 30, 2008. It is possible that reimbursement changes for oxygen equipment could be considered at that time. Additionally, the President’s 2008 fiscal year budget proposes a reduction in the maximum continuous oxygen equipment rental period from 36 months to 13 months. No further information on this proposal is available at this time and we cannot predict whether or not the proposal will be included in the final budget approved by Congress. Further reductions in Medicare reimbursement for oxygen equipment could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s net revenues, operating income, cash flows and financial position.

     On November 1, 2006, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) published rule CMS-1304-F, describing the Medicare regulations, as interpreted by CMS, required to implement the DRA oxygen provisions. The rule codified the new payment methodology and related provisions with respect to oxygen, including, but not limited to, defining the 36-month capped rental period of continuous use, transfer of title, payment for oxygen contents for beneficiary-owned oxygen equipment, payment for maintenance and servicing of oxygen equipment and procedures for replacement of beneficiary-owned equipment. The DRA oxygen provisions and related regulations represented a fundamental change in the Medicare payment system for oxygen. These provisions are complex, and are expected to result in profound changes in the provider-customer relationship for oxygen equipment and related services. The Company believes that the 36-month rental cap will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s net revenues, operating income, cash flows and financial position when it takes effect in 2009 and beyond.

     Included in rule CMS-1304-F are changes to the Medicare payment rates for oxygen and oxygen equipment that took effect on January 1, 2007. CMS is exercising its authority under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (“BBA”) to establish separate classes and monthly payment rates for oxygen. The rule establishes a new class and monthly payment amount for oxygen-generating portable equipment (“OGPE”), which includes oxygen transfilling equipment and portable oxygen concentrators. An OGPE add-on payment, applicable during the 36-month rental period, will be made for these systems in the amount of $51.63. Payments for the new OGPE add-on began on January 1, 2007 for new and existing oxygen users. CMS also increased the monthly payment amounts for portable oxygen contents for beneficiary-owned liquid or gaseous oxygen equipment from approximately $20.77 to $77.45. The increase in payments for portable oxygen contents became effective on January 1, 2007 for new and existing oxygen users. The BBA requires these changes to be budget neutral, and, accordingly, CMS reduced

10


other Medicare oxygen payment rates beginning in 2007. As a result, the monthly payment amount for stationary oxygen equipment is expected to change each year in order to offset the impact from changes in beneficiary utilization of OGPE equipment. For 2008, the payment rate for stationary oxygen equipment will increase from $198.40 to $199.28, which is expected to increase our net revenues and operating income by approximately $3.0 million in 2008. CMS previously published projected rates for 2008, 2009 and 2010 of $198.40, $193.21 and $189.39, respectively. CMS will revise payment rates in future years under the methodology specified in the rule based on actual OGPE use and updated data on the distribution of beneficiaries using oxygen equipment. To the extent that the Company’s distribution of oxygen equipment and oxygen contents in future years differs from that of the overall Medicare market, these future payment rate revisions may have a significant effect on the overall level of reimbursement for the Company’s oxygen business.

     DRA also changes the reimbursement methodology for items of DME in the capped rental payment category, including but not limited to such items as continuous positive airway pressure (“CPAP”) devices, certain respiratory assist devices, nebulizers, hospital beds and wheelchairs. For such items of DME, payment may not extend over a period of continuous use of longer than 13 months. The option for a supplier to retain ownership of the item after a 15-month rental period and receive semi-annual maintenance and service payments is eliminated. On the first day that begins after the 13th continuous month during which payment is made for the item, the supplier will transfer title of the item to the beneficiary. Additional payments for maintenance and service of the item will be made for parts and labor not covered by a supplier’s or manufacturer’s warranty. The DME capped rental provisions contained in DRA applied to items furnished for which the first rental month occurred on or after January 1, 2006. Accordingly, the first month in which the new payment methodology impacted our net revenues was February 2007.

     Included in rule CMS-1304-F is a discussion of the Medicare regulations, as interpreted by CMS, necessary to implement the DME capped rental changes contained in the DRA. In addition, on January 26, 2006, CMS announced a final rule revising the payment classification of certain respiratory assist devices (“RADs”). RADs with a backup rate feature were reclassified as capped rental DME items effective April 1, 2006, whereby payments to providers of such devices will cease after the 13th continuous month of rental. Prior to the rule, providers were paid a continuous monthly rental amount over the entire period of medical necessity. In cases where Medicare beneficiaries received the item prior to April 1, 2006, only the rental payments for months after the effective date count toward the 13-month cap. Accordingly, the first month is which the new payment methodology impacted our net revenues was May 2007. The Company estimates that the capped rental changes to DME and RADs reduced the Company’s net revenues and operating income by approximately $11.4 million in 2007 and will reduce net revenues and operating income in 2008 by approximately $22.1 million. In addition, the transfer of ownership provisions affecting Medicare capped rental equipment resulted in a reduction in the estimated useful lives of such equipment beginning in 2006 and a corresponding increase in depreciation expense. The Company will continue to evaluate its estimates of useful lives based on its experience with ownership transfers of capped rental equipment in future periods, which may result in further increases in depreciation expense in the future.

A SIGNIFICANT PERCENTAGE OF OUR BUSINESS IS DERIVED FROM THE SALE OF MEDICARE-COVERED RESPIRATORY MEDICATIONS, AND RECENT LEGISLATION IMPOSED SIGNIFICANT REDUCTIONS IN MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUCH INHALATION DRUGS.

     Historically, prescription drug coverage under Medicare has been limited to drugs furnished incident to a physician’s services and certain self-administered drugs, including inhalation drug therapies. Prior to MMA, Medicare reimbursement for covered Part B drugs, including inhalation drugs that we provide, was limited to 95 percent of the published average wholesale price (“AWP”) for the drug. MMA established new payment limits and procedures for drugs reimbursed under Medicare Part B (See “MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT”). Beginning in 2005, inhalation drugs furnished to Medicare beneficiaries were reimbursed at 106 percent of the volume-weighted average selling price (“ASP”) of the drug, as determined from data provided each quarter by drug manufacturers under a specific formula described in MMA. Implementation of the ASP-based formula resulted in a dramatic reduction in payment rates for inhalation drugs in 2005 and beyond.

     Recently enacted legislation will further affect Medicare reimbursement amounts for covered Part B drugs, including inhalation drugs that we provide, beginning April 1, 2008. The SCHIP Extension Act requires CMS to adjust the ASP calculation methodology used to determine Medicare payment amounts for inhalation drugs by using volume-weighted ASPs based on actual sales volume rather than average sales price. When implemented on April 1, 2008, the new calculation methodology is expected to result in lower reimbursement amounts for inhalation drugs. The SCHIP Extension Act also specifically lowers reimbursement for the inhalation drug albuterol sulfate. The Congressional Budget Office (“CBO”) estimates that the provisions of the SCHIP Extension Act affecting Part B drug reimbursement will result in reductions in aggregate Medicare outlays for such drugs of $1.0 billion over five years and $2.6 billion over 10 years. CMS is expected to announce in March 2008 the payment rates to be in effect for the second quarter of 2008 under the new methodology. We can not determine the impact of such payment reductions on the Company’s business until CMS publishes the new quarterly reimbursement amounts for each specific inhalation drug provided by the Company. We can also not determine whether quarterly updates in ASP pricing data will continue to result in ongoing reductions in payment rates for inhalation drugs, and what impact such payment reductions could have on our business in the future.

11


RECENT REGULATORY CHANGES SUBJECT THE MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT RATES FOR OUR EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES TO ADDITIONAL REDUCTIONS AND TO POTENTIAL DISCRETIONARY ADJUSTMENT BY CMS, WHICH COULD REDUCE OUR REVENUES, NET INCOME AND CASH FLOWS.

     In February 2006, a final rule governing CMS’ Inherent Reasonableness, or IR, authority became effective. The IR rule establishes a process for adjusting fee schedule amounts for Medicare Part B services when existing payment amounts are determined to be either grossly excessive or deficient. The rule describes the factors that CMS or its contractors will consider in making such determinations and the procedures that will be followed in establishing new payment amounts. To date, no payment adjustments have occurred or been proposed as a result of the IR rule.

     The effectiveness of the IR rule itself does not trigger payment adjustments for any items or services. Nevertheless, the IR rule puts in place a process that could eventually have a significant impact on Medicare payments for our equipment and services. We can not predict whether or when CMS will exercise its IR authority with respect to payment for our equipment and services, or the effect that such payment adjustments would have on our financial position or operating results.

RECENT LEGISLATION ESTABLISHING A COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS UNDER MEDICARE COULD REDUCE OUR REVENUES, NET INCOME AND CASH FLOWS.

     Recent legislation instructs CMS to establish and implement programs under which competitive acquisition areas will be established throughout the United States for contract award purposes for the furnishing of competitively priced items of DME, including oxygen equipment (See “MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT”). The program will be implemented in phases such that competition under the program will occur in ten of the largest MSAs in 2008, 80 of the largest MSAs in 2009, and additional areas after 2009. Items selected for competitive acquisition will be phased in first among the highest cost and highest volume items and services or those items and services that CMS determines have the largest savings potential. In carrying out such programs, CMS may exempt rural areas and areas with low-population density within urban areas that are not competitive, unless there is a significant national market through mail order for a particular item or service.

     For each competitive acquisition area, CMS will conduct a competition under which providers will submit bids to supply certain covered items of DME. Successful bidders will be expected to meet certain program quality standards in order to be awarded a contract and only successful bidders can supply the covered items to Medicare beneficiaries in the acquisition area. The applicable contract award prices are expected to be less than would be paid under current Medicare fee schedules, and contracts will be re-bid at least every three years. CMS will be required to award contracts to multiple entities submitting bids in each area for an item or service, but will have the authority to limit the number of contractors in a competitive acquisition area to the number needed to meet projected demand. CMS may use competitive bid pricing information to adjust the payment amount otherwise in effect for an area that is not a competitive acquisition area.

     On April 2, 2007, CMS issued rule CMS-1270-F implementing the competitive bidding program in ten of the largest MSAs across the country, applying initially to ten categories of DME and medical supplies. CMS concluded the bidding process for the first round of MSAs in September 2007, and expects to announce winning suppliers early this year and to have payments under the program go into effect in July 2008. CMS expects to begin soliciting bids for the second round of 70 MSAs in the summer of 2008. We can not predict the outcome of the competitive bidding program on our business nor the Medicare payment rates that will be in effect in 2008 and beyond for the items subjected to competitive bidding.

FUTURE REDUCTIONS IN REIMBURSEMENT RATES UNDER MEDICAID COULD REDUCE OUR REVENUES, NET INCOME AND CASH FLOWS.

     Due to budgetary shortfalls, many states are considering, or have enacted, cuts to their Medicaid programs, including funding for our equipment and services. These cuts have included, or may include, elimination or reduction of coverage for some or all of our equipment and services, amounts eligible for payment under co-insurance arrangements, or payment rates for covered items. Approximately 6% of our customers are eligible for primary Medicaid benefits, and State Medicaid programs fund approximately 12% of our payments from primary and secondary insurance benefits. Continued state budgetary pressures could lead to further reductions in funding for the reimbursement for our equipment and services which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and operating results.

12


FUTURE REDUCTIONS IN REIMBURSEMENT RATES FROM PRIVATE PAYORS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING RESULTS.

     Payors such as private insurance companies and employers are under pressure to increase profitability and reduce costs. In response, certain payors are limiting coverage or reducing reimbursement rates for the equipment and services we provide. Approximately 22% of our customers and approximately 29% of our primary and secondary payments are derived from private payors. Continued financial pressures on these entities could lead to further reimbursement reductions for our equipment and services that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

WE DEPEND UPON REIMBURSEMENT FROM THIRD-PARTY PAYORS FOR A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF OUR REVENUES, AND IF WE FAIL TO MANAGE THE COMPLEX AND LENGTHY REIMBURSEMENT PROCESS, OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS COULD SUFFER.

     We derive a significant majority of our revenues from reimbursement by third-party payors. We accept assignment of insurance benefits from customers and, in most instances, invoice and collect payments directly from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance carriers, as well as from customers under co-insurance provisions. Approximately 52% of our revenues are derived from Medicare, 29% from private insurance carriers, 12% from Medicaid and the balance directly from individual customers and commercial entities.

     Our financial condition and results of operations may be affected by the reimbursement process, which in the health care industry is complex and can involve lengthy delays between the time that services are rendered and the time that the reimbursement amounts are settled. Depending on the payor, we may be required to obtain certain payor-specific documentation from physicians and other health care providers before submitting claims for reimbursement. Certain payors have filing deadlines and they will not pay claims submitted after such time. We can not ensure that we will be able to continue to effectively manage the reimbursement process and collect payments for our equipment and services promptly.

WE ARE SUBJECT TO EXTENSIVE FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATION, AND IF WE FAIL TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, WE COULD SUFFER SEVERE CRIMINAL OR CIVIL SANCTIONS OR BE REQUIRED TO MAKE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO OUR OPERATIONS THAT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

     The federal government and all states in which we operate regulate many aspects of our business. In particular, our operating centers are subject to federal laws that regulate the repackaging of drugs (including oxygen) and interstate motor-carrier transportation. Our operations also are subject to state laws governing, among other things, pharmacies, nursing services, distribution of medical equipment and certain types of home health activities. Certain of our employees are subject to state laws and regulations governing the ethics and professional practices of respiratory therapy, pharmacy and nursing.

     As a health care supplier, we are subject to extensive government regulation, including numerous laws directed at preventing fraud and abuse and laws regulating reimbursement under various government programs. The marketing, billing, documenting and other practices of health care companies are all subject to government scrutiny. To ensure compliance with Medicare and other regulations, regional carriers often conduct audits and request customer records and other documents to support our claims for payment. Similarly, government agencies periodically open investigations and obtain information from health care providers pursuant to the legal process. Violations of federal and state regulations can result in severe criminal, civil and administrative penalties and sanctions, including disqualification from Medicare and other reimbursement programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

     Health care is an area of rapid regulatory change. Changes in the law and new interpretations of existing laws may affect permissible activities, the costs associated with doing business, and reimbursement amounts paid by federal, state and other third-party payors. We can not predict the future of federal, state and local regulation or legislation, including Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations, or possible changes in national health care policies. Future legislation and regulatory changes could have a material adverse effect on our business.

WE ARE SUBJECT TO A CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGEEMENT WITH THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, AND IF WE FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT, WE COULD SUFFER SEVERE CRIMINAL, CIVIL OR ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS.

     We are subject to a five-year corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General that began in May 2006. Violations of the terms of the corporate integrity agreement could result in severe criminal, civil and administrative penalties and sanctions, including disqualification from Medicare and other reimbursement programs.

13


COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS UNDER THE FEDERAL HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 AND RELATED RULES, OR HIPAA, RELATING TO THE TRANSMISSION AND PRIVACY OF HEALTH INFORMATION COULD IMPOSE ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT COSTS ON OUR OPERATIONS. 

     Numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including HIPAA, govern the collection, dissemination, use and confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information. HIPAA requires us to comply with standards for the use and disclosure of health information within our company and with third parties. HIPAA also includes standards for common health care electronic transactions and code sets, such as claims information, plan eligibility, payment information and the use of electronic signatures, and privacy and electronic security of individually identifiable health information. Each set of HIPAA regulations requires health care providers, including us, in addition to health plans and clearinghouses, to develop and maintain policies and procedures with respect to protected health information that is used or disclosed.

     If we do not comply with existing or new laws and regulations related to patient health information, we could be subject to criminal or civil sanctions. New health information standards, whether implemented pursuant to HIPAA or otherwise, could have a significant effect on the manner in which we handle health care related data and communicate with payors, and the cost of complying with these standards could be significant.

WE MAY UNDERTAKE ACQUISITIONS THAT COULD SUBJECT US TO UNANTICIPATED LIABILITIES AND THAT COULD FAIL TO ACHIEVE EXPECTED BENEFITS.

     Our strategy is to increase our market share through internal growth and strategic acquisitions. Consideration for the acquisitions has generally consisted of cash, unsecured non-interest bearing obligations and the assumption of certain liabilities.

     The implementation of an acquisition strategy entails certain risks, including inaccurate assessment of disclosed liabilities, the existence of undisclosed liabilities, regulatory compliance issues associated with the acquired business, entry into markets in which we may have limited or no experience, diversion of management’s attention and human resources from our underlying business, difficulties in integrating the operations of an acquired business or in realizing anticipated efficiencies and cost savings, failure to retain key management or operating personnel of the acquired business, and an increase in indebtedness and a limitation in the ability to access additional capital on favorable terms. The successful integration of an acquired business may be dependent on the size of the acquired business, condition of the customer billing records, and complexity of system conversions and execution of the integration plan by local management. If we do not successfully integrate the acquired business, the acquisition could fail to achieve its expected revenue contribution or there could be delays in the billing and collection of claims for services rendered to customers, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and operating results.

WE FACE INTENSE NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND LOCAL COMPETITION AND IF WE ARE UNABLE TO COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY, WE WILL LOSE REVENUES AND OUR BUSINESS WILL SUFFER.

     The home respiratory market is a fragmented and highly competitive industry. We compete against other national providers and, by our estimate, more than 2,000 local and regional providers. Home respiratory companies compete primarily on the basis of service rather than price since reimbursement levels are established by Medicare and Medicaid or by the individual determinations of private health plans.

     Our ability to compete successfully and to increase our referrals of new customers are highly dependent upon our reputation within each local health care market for providing responsive, professional and high-quality service and achieving strong customer satisfaction. Given the relatively low barriers to entry in the home respiratory market, we expect that the industry will become increasingly competitive in the future. Increased competition in the future could limit our ability to attract and retain key operating personnel and achieve continued growth in our core business.

INCREASES IN OUR COSTS COULD ERODE OUR PROFIT MARGINS AND SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCE OUR NET INCOME AND CASH FLOWS.

     Cost containment in the health care industry, fueled, in part, by federal and state government budgetary shortfalls, is likely to result in constant or decreasing reimbursement amounts for our equipment and services. As a result, we must control our operating cost levels, particularly labor and related costs, which account for a significant component of our operating costs and expenditures. We compete with other health care providers to attract and retain qualified or skilled personnel. We also compete with various industries for lower-wage administrative and service employees. Since reimbursement rates are established by fee schedules mandated by Medicare, Medicaid and private payors, we are not able to offset the effects of general inflation in labor and related cost components, if any, through increases in prices for our equipment and services. Consequently, such cost increases could erode our profit margins and reduce our net income.

14


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

     None.

Item 2. Properties

     Lincare owns its headquarters facility located in Clearwater, Florida and two of its 1,019 operating center locations. Lincare’s other 1,017 operating center locations are leased from unrelated third parties. Each operating center is a combination warehouse and office, with warehouse space generally comprising about half of the facility. Warehouse space is used for storage of adequate supplies of equipment and accessories necessary to conduct our business. We also lease 31 separate billing centers from unrelated third parties.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

     As a health care provider, the Company is subject to extensive government regulation, including numerous laws directed at preventing fraud and abuse and laws regulating reimbursement under various government programs. The marketing, billing, documenting and other practices of health care companies are all subject to government scrutiny. To ensure compliance with Medicare and other regulations, regional carriers often conduct audits and request patient records and other documents to support claims submitted by Lincare for payment of services rendered to customers. Similarly, government agencies periodically open investigations and obtain information from health care providers pursuant to legal process.

     Violations of federal and state regulations can result in severe criminal, civil and administrative penalties and sanctions, including disqualification from Medicare and other reimbursement programs.

     From time to time, the Company receives inquiries from various government agencies requesting customer records and other documents. It has been the Company’s policy to cooperate with all such requests for information. However, the Company can provide no assurances as to the duration or outcome of these inquiries.

     Private litigants may also make claims against health care providers for violations of health care laws in actions known as qui tam suits. In these cases, the government has the opportunity to intervene in, and take control of, the litigation. We are a defendant in certain qui tam proceedings. The government has declined to intervene for purposes other than dismissal in all unsealed qui tam actions of which we are aware and we are vigorously defending these suits.

     Our operating centers are also subject to federal and/or state laws regulating, among other things, interstate motor-carrier transportation, repackaging of oxygen, distribution of medical equipment, certain types of home health activities, pharmacy operations, nursing services and respiratory services and apply to those locations involved in such activities. Certain of our employees are subject to state laws and regulations governing the ethics and professional practice of respiratory therapy, pharmacy and nursing. From time to time, the Company receives inquiries and complaints from various government agencies related to its operations or personnel. It has been the Company’s policy to cooperate with all such inquiries and vigorously defend any administrative complaints. The Company can provide no assurances as to the duration or outcome of these inquiries and/or complaints.

     We are also involved in certain other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business. The ultimate disposition of all such matters is not currently expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

     We are subject to a five-year corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General that began in May 2006. Violations of the corporate integrity agreement can result in severe criminal, civil and administrative penalties and sanctions, including disqualification from Medicare and other reimbursement programs.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     No matters were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the fourth quarter of 2007.

15


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

     Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol LNCR. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices as reported by NASDAQ for the periods indicated.

High Low
2007
First quarter      $ 41.91      $ 36.35
Second quarter 40.91 36.35
Third quarter 40.62 32.70
Fourth quarter 37.83 33.07
2006
First quarter $ 44.08 $ 38.00
Second quarter 40.74 36.40
Third quarter 39.20 33.49
Fourth quarter 40.80 31.95

     As of January 31, 2008, there were approximately 356 holders of record of the 73,189,060 outstanding shares of Lincare common stock. The closing price of Lincare common stock on January 31, 2008, was $33.41 per share, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market.

     We have not paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. It is the present intention of our Board of Directors to retain all earnings in order to support the future growth of our business and, from time to time, when authorized by our Board of Directors, to repurchase our common stock on the open market.

     During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company repurchased approximately 18.4 million shares of its common stock at a cost of approximately $673.4 million. The following table sets forth the purchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2007.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Approximate
Total Number Dollar Value of
of Shares Shares that May
Total Purchased as Yet Be Purchased
Number of Average Part of the Under the
Shares Price Paid Repurchase Repurchase
                                       Period Purchased Per Share Programs Programs
October 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007       5,211,700                  $ 33.71       5,211,700       $ 504,513,000
November 1, 2007 to November 30, 2007 2,343,842 $ 35.36 2,343,842 $ 430,165,000
December 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 3,210,197 $ 35.78 3,210,197 $ 310,606,000
 
     Total 10,765,739 $ 34.69 10,765,739  

     On February 14, 2006, the Board authorized a share repurchase plan whereby the Company may repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock in amounts determined pursuant to a formula that takes into account both the ratio of the Company’s net debt to cash flow and its available cash resources and borrowing availability. On January 23, 2007 and October 23, 2007, the Board approved modifications to the formula to increase the ratio of net debt to cash flow to allow additional share repurchases. As of December 31, 2007, $310.6 million of common stock was eligible for repurchase in accordance with the formula.

16


     The following table sets forth information as of the end of fiscal year 2007 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Number of securities
Number of remaining
securities to available for
be issued future issuance
upon under equity
exercise of Weighted-average compensation
outstanding exercise price of plans
options, outstanding (excluding
warrants and options, warrants securities reflected
Plan Category       rights       and rights       in column (a))
(a)   (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders   8,955,616   $33.46   3,452,006
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders None N/A None
Total 8,955,616   $33.46 3,452,006

17


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

     The selected consolidated financial data presented below the caption “Statements of Operations Data” for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, and 2003, and the caption “Balance Sheet Data” as of December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are derived from our consolidated financial statements audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm.

     The data set forth below are qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Certain Risk Factors Relating to the Company’s Business included in this report.

Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005       2004       2003
(In thousands, except per share data)
Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenues      $ 1,595,990      $ 1,409,795      $ 1,266,627      $ 1,268,531    $ 1,147,356
Cost of goods and services 389,884 316,103 253,260 184,398 171,658
Operating expenses 365,016 331,897 295,807 264,627 253,769
Selling, general and administrative expenses 317,722 291,623 251,839 257,019 239,656
Bad debt expense 23,940 21,147 18,999 19,028 17,210
Depreciation expense 116,020 100,499 93,260 86,615 75,007
Amortization expense 260 1,467 1,682 1,537 1,587
      Operating income 383,148 347,059 351,780 455,307 388,469
Interest income 4,063 2,719 3,718 2,151 226
Interest expense 26,543 9,935 12,432 17,055 17,431
Income before income taxes 360,668 339,843 343,066 440,403 371,264
Income tax expense 134,591 126,862 129,370 166,975 139,153
      Net income $ 226,077 $ 212,981 $ 213,696 $ 273,428 $ 232,111
Income per common share:
      Basic $ 2.71 $ 2.26 $ 2.16 $ 2.74 $ 2.28
      Diluted (1) $ 2.58 $ 2.16 $ 2.06 $ 2.60 $ 2.19
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 83,387 94,209 98,913 99,681 101,671
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents
      outstanding (1)
89,688 101,106 106,306 107,223 107,414

      (1)      

Figures in 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 reflect the application of the “if converted” method of accounting for our outstanding 3.0% convertible debentures in accordance with EITF Issue No. 04-8, effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. Figures in 2003 have been restated for comparative purposes in accordance with the requirements of EITF No. 04-8.


At December 31,
      2007       2006       2005       2004       2003
(In thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets      $ 1,928,364      $ 1,775,310      $ 1,681,236      $ 1,721,064      $ 1,431,660
Long-term obligations, including current installments 838,207 346,047 289,141 343,230 386,753
Stockholders’ equity 733,788 1,110,577 1,137,876 1,166,325 848,247

18


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

     We continue to pursue a strategy of increasing market share in existing and surrounding geographic markets through internal growth and selective acquisition of local and regional companies. In addition, we will continue to expand into new geographic markets on a selective basis, either through acquisition or by opening new operating centers, when we believe it will enhance our business. Our focus remains primarily on oxygen and other respiratory therapy services, which represent approximately 92% of our revenues.

Critical Accounting Policies

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lincare Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries. We have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

     Critical accounting policies are those we believe are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating results and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. We consider the following policies to be most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing our consolidated financial statements.

     Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable

     Our revenues are recognized on an accrual basis in the period in which services and related products are provided to customers and are recorded at net realizable amounts estimated to be paid by customers and third-party payors. Insurance benefits are assigned to the Company and, accordingly, the Company bills on behalf of its customers. The Company’s billing system contains payor-specific price tables that reflect the fee schedule amounts in effect or contractually agreed upon by various government and commercial payors for each item of equipment or supply provided to a customer. The Company has established an allowance to account for sales adjustments that result from differences between the payment amount received and the expected realizable amount. Actual adjustments that result from differences between the payment amount received and the expected realizable amount are recorded against the allowance for sales adjustments and are typically identified and ultimately recorded at the point of cash application or when otherwise determined pursuant to the Company’s collection procedures. We report revenues in our financial statements net of such adjustments.

     Certain items provided by the Company are reimbursed under rental arrangements that generally provide for fixed monthly payments established by fee schedules for as long as the patient is using the equipment and medical necessity continues (subject to capped rental arrangements which limit the rental payment periods in some instances and which may result in a transfer of title to the patient at the end of the rental payment period). Once initial delivery of rental equipment is made to the patient, a monthly billing cycle is established based on the initial date of delivery. The Company recognizes rental arrangement revenues ratably over the monthly service period and defers revenue for the portion of the monthly bill which is unearned. No separate payment is earned from the initial equipment delivery and setup process. During the rental period, we are responsible for servicing the equipment and providing routine maintenance, if necessary.

     Our revenue recognition policy is consistent with the criteria set forth in Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 — Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”) for determining when revenue is realized or realizable and earned. We recognize revenue in accordance with the requirements of SAB 104 that:

  • persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

  • delivery has occurred;

  • the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and

  • collectibility is reasonably assured.

     Due to the nature of the industry and the reimbursement environment in which we operate, certain estimates are required to record net revenues and accounts receivable at their net realizable values at the time products and/or services are provided. Inherent in these estimates is the risk that they will have to be revised or updated as additional information becomes available. Specifically, the complexity of many third-party billing arrangements and the uncertainty of reimbursement amounts for certain services from certain payors may result in adjustments to amounts originally recorded. Such adjustments are typically identified and recorded at the point of cash application, claim denial or account review. 

19


     Included in accounts receivable are earned but unbilled receivables. Unbilled accounts receivable represent charges for equipment and supplies delivered to customers for which invoices have not yet been generated by the billing system. Prior to the delivery of equipment and supplies to customers, we perform certain certification and approval procedures to ensure collection is reasonably assured and that unbilled accounts receivable are recorded at net amounts expected to be paid by customers and third-party payors. Billing delays, ranging from several weeks to several months, can occur due to delays in obtaining certain required payor-specific documentation from internal and external sources, interim transactions occurring between cycle billing dates established for each customer within the billing system and business acquisitions awaiting assignment of new provider enrollment identification numbers. In the event that a third-party payor does not accept the claim for payment, the customer is ultimately responsible.

     We perform analyses to evaluate the net realizable value of accounts receivable. Specifically, we consider historical realization data, accounts receivable aging trends, other operating trends and relevant business conditions. Because of continuing changes in the health care industry and third-party reimbursement, it is possible that our estimates could change, which could have a material impact on our operations and cash flows.

     Bad Debt Expense, Sales Adjustments and Related Allowances for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable

     Accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for sales adjustments and uncollectible accounts. The majority of our accounts receivable are due from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance carriers, as well as from customers under co-insurance provisions. Third-party reimbursement is a complicated process that involves submission of claims to multiple payors, each having its own claims requirements. In some cases, the ultimate collection of accounts receivable subsequent to the service dates may not be known for several months. Bad debt is recorded as an operating expense and consists of billed charges that are ultimately deemed uncollectible due to the customer’s or third-party payor’s inability or refusal to pay. We record bad debt expense based on a percentage of revenue using historical Company-specific data. The percentage and amounts used to record bad debt expense and the allowance for doubtful accounts are supported by various methods, including current and historical cash collections, bad debt write-offs, and aging of accounts receivable. Our proprietary management information systems are utilized to provide this data in order to assess bad debts. In the event that collection results of existing accounts receivable are not consistent with historical experience, there may be a need to increase our allowances for doubtful accounts, which may materially impact our financial position or results of operations. The Company has established an allowance to account for sales adjustments that result from differences between the payment amounts received from customers and third-party payors and the expected realizable amounts. Actual adjustments that result from such differences are recorded against the allowance for sales adjustments and are typically identified and ultimately recorded at the point of cash application or when otherwise determined pursuant to the Company’s collection procedures. We report revenues in our financial statements net of such adjustments.

     Business Acquisition Accounting

     The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” provide guidance on the application of generally accepted accounting principles for business acquisitions. We apply the purchase method of accounting for business acquisitions, and use available cash from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit agreement and the assumption of certain liabilities as the consideration for business acquisitions. We allocate the purchase price of our business acquisitions based on the fair market value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets. The difference between the total cost of the acquisition and the sum of the fair values of acquired tangible and identifiable intangible assets less liabilities is recorded as goodwill.

     Impairment of Intangible and Long-Lived Assets

     We assess the Company’s intangible assets for impairment annually, pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Additionally, intangible and long-lived assets impairment is tested whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that could trigger an impairment review include, without limitation, (i) significant under-performance of acquired assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and (vi) technological and regulatory changes.

     When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles and long-lived assets may be impaired, we evaluate the ability to recover those assets. If those assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

20


     Contingencies

     We are involved in certain claims and legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” provides guidance on the application of generally accepted accounting principles related to contingencies. We evaluate and record liabilities for contingencies based on known claims and legal actions when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the liability can be reasonably estimated. We have concluded that accrued liabilities related to contingencies are appropriate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Results of Operations

Net Revenues

     The following table sets forth for the periods indicated a summary of our net revenues by product category:

Year Ended December 31,
2007       2006       2005
      (In thousands)
Oxygen and other respiratory therapy      $ 1,470,363      $ 1,295,983      $ 1,154,268
Home medical equipment and other 125,627 113,812 112,359
Total $ 1,595,990 $ 1,409,795 $ 1,266,627

     Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased by $186.2 million, an increase of 13.2% above net revenues for 2006. The 13.2% increase in net revenues in 2007 was comprised of 11.3% internal growth and 3.5% acquisition growth, partially offset by Medicare price changes taking effect in 2007 (see “Medicare Reimbursement”). Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased by $143.2 million, an increase of 11.3% above net revenues for 2005. The 11.3% increase in net revenues in 2006 was comprised of 13.3% internal growth and 2.6% acquisition growth partially offset by Medicare price changes taking effect in 2006. The internal growth in net revenues is attributable to underlying growth in the market for our products (estimated at 6.0% annually) and increased market share resulting primarily from our reputation for high quality equipment and customer service. Growth in net revenues from acquisitions is attributable to the effects of acquisitions of local and regional companies and is estimated based on the contribution to net revenues for the four quarters following such acquisitions. During 2007 and 2006, we completed the acquisition of three businesses with annual revenues of approximately $4.3 million and ten businesses with annual revenues of approximately $67.0 million, respectively.

     The contribution of oxygen and other respiratory therapy products to our net revenues was 92.1%, 91.9% and 91.1%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. Our strategy is to focus on the provision of oxygen and other respiratory therapy services to patients in the home and to provide home medical equipment and other services where we believe such services will enhance our core respiratory business.

Cost of Goods and Services

     Cost of goods and services as a percentage of net revenues was 24.4% for the year ended December 31, 2007, 22.4% for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 20.0% for the year ended December 31, 2005. Cost of goods and services increased by $73.8 million, or 23.3%, in 2007 and $62.8 million, or 24.8% in 2006. The increase in cost of goods and services in 2007 is attributable primarily to an increase in drug purchasing costs due to a product mix shift away from compounded to higher cost commercially-available products in our inhalation drug business as a result of a determination by CMS to eliminate Medicare coverage of compounded medications as of July 1, 2007. Also contributing to higher cost of goods and services in 2007 were increased sales of medical supplies and nutritional products to pediatric customers associated with our acquisition of the business of a pediatric respiratory provider in the fourth quarter of 2006. We also experienced significant growth in our sleep therapy product lines during 2007, which generally carry a lower gross margin than other products we provide. The increase in cost of goods and services in 2006 is attributable primarily to increased patient and drug shipment volumes and an increase in drug purchasing costs due to a product mix shift in our inhalation drug product line. Cost of goods and services in 2006 was also impacted by growth in shipments of disposables and accessories related to our sleep therapy product lines.

     Cost of goods and services includes the cost of equipment (excluding depreciation of $82.6 million, $68.6 million and $62.3 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively), drugs and supplies sold to patients and certain operating costs related to the Company’s respiratory drug product line. These costs include an allocation of customer service, distribution and administrative costs relating to the respiratory drug product line of approximately $48.8 million, $49.2 million and $50.0 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included in cost of goods and services for the year ended December 31, 2007 are salary and related expenses of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians of $10.5 million. Such salary and related expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $10.3 million and $10.2 million, respectively.

21


Operating and Other Expenses

     Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were 22.9%, 23.5% and 23.4%, respectively. Operating expenses in 2007 and 2006 increased by $33.1 million, or 10.0%, and $36.1 million, or 12.2%, respectively, when compared with the prior year periods. Gains in productivity at our operating centers and modest growth in office rent and related facility expenses helped to offset higher freight charges due to gains in customer shipment volumes in our inhalation drug and sleep accessory product lines and significant vehicle-related cost increases attributable to higher fuel prices and vehicle lease expenses.

     The Company manages over 1,000 operating centers from which customers are provided equipment, supplies and services. An operating center averages approximately seven to eight employees and is typically comprised of a center manager, two customer service representatives (referred to as “CSR’s” – telephone intake, scheduling, documentation), two or three service representatives (referred to as “Service Reps” – delivery, maintenance and retrieval of equipment and delivery of disposables), a respiratory therapist (non-reimbursable and discretionary clinical follow-up with the customer and communication to the prescribing physician) and a sales representative (marketing calls to local physicians and other referral sources).

     The Company includes in operating expenses the costs incurred at the Company’s operating centers for certain service personnel (center manager, CSR’s and Service Reps), facilities (rent, utilities, communications, property taxes, etc.), vehicles (vehicle leases, gasoline, repair and maintenance), and general business supplies and miscellaneous expenses. Operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 within these major categories were as follows:

Operating Expenses (in thousands) Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
Salary and related       $ 232,579       $ 208,994     $ 185,435
Facilities 55,617 51,914     49,451
Vehicles 45,120 40,598 34,982
General supplies/miscellaneous 31,700 30,391 25,939
 
     Total $ 365,016 $ 331,897 $ 295,807

     Included in operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2007 are salary and related expenses for Service Reps in the amount of $100.0 million. Such salary and related expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $91.2 million and $80.7 million, respectively.

     Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) as a percentage of net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, were 19.9%, 20.7%, and 19.9%, respectively. SG&A expenses in 2007 increased by $26.1 million, or 8.9%, compared with the prior year period. Contributing to the increase in SG&A expenses in 2007 were higher payroll costs included in selling expenses and higher liability insurance expenses, partially offset by cost controls at our administrative, field overhead and billing office locations and lower stock-based compensation expense. SG&A expenses in 2006 increased by $39.8 million, or 15.8%, compared with the prior year period. SG&A expenses in 2006 were impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 123R (see Notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements) effective January 1, 2006, resulting in the recognition of $20.3 million of stock-based compensation expense during the year. Also contributing to the increase in SG&A expenses in 2006 were higher payroll costs included in selling expenses and higher legal expenses, partially offset by cost controls at our administrative, field overhead and billing office locations.

     SG&A expenses include costs related to sales and marketing activities, clinical respiratory services, corporate overhead and other business support functions. Included in SG&A during the year ended December 31, 2007 are salary and related expenses of $226.2 million. These salary and related expenses include the cost of the Company’s respiratory therapists in the amount of $63.0 million during 2007. The Company’s respiratory therapists generally provide non-reimbursable and discretionary clinical follow-up with the customer and communication, as appropriate, to the prescribing physician with respect to the customer’s plan of care. The Company includes the salaries and related expenses of its respiratory therapist personnel (licensed respiratory therapists or, in some cases, registered nurses) in SG&A because it believes that these personnel enhance the Company’s business relative to its competitors that do not employ respiratory therapists. Included in SG&A during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are salary and related expenses of $207.9 million and $168.6 million, respectively. These salary and related expenses include the cost of the Company’s respiratory therapists in the amount of $54.0 million and $45.9 million during the respective years.

22


     Bad debt expense as a percentage of net revenues was 1.5% for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. Days sales outstanding (“DSO”) were 43 days at December 31, 2007, up from 42 days and 40 days at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in DSO over the three-year period is attributable primarily to disruptions caused by the transition in the contractors that process Medicare claims during 2006 and 2007 (see “Medicare Reimbursement”), an increase in accounts receivable from business acquisitions and growth in our sleep therapy product line, which generally has a higher mix of managed care and commercial insurance payors than our traditional Medicare business. Our net accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2006 was also impacted by the adoption by the Company of the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”) during the fourth quarter of 2006 which resulted in the Company recording an allowance for sales adjustments of $10.7 million (see Note 3 and Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). While we have achieved consistent results in managing bad debt expense over the past three years, business acquisition activities may contribute to an increase in our bad debt expense in the future. The integration of acquired companies into our regional billing and collections offices may temporarily disrupt collections, increasing the amount of accounts receivable written off as uncollectible.

     Depreciation expense as a percentage of net revenues was 7.3% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with 7.1% and 7.4% for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included in depreciation expense in the year ended December 31, 2007 is depreciation of medical equipment of $82.6 million and depreciation of other property and equipment of $33.4 million. Included in depreciation expense in the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 is depreciation of medical equipment of $68.6 million and $62.3 million, respectively, and depreciation of other property and equipment of $31.9 million and $31.0 million, respectively. The growth in depreciation expense in 2007 compared with 2006 is attributed to increased purchases of medical and other equipment necessary to support the growth in the Company's customer base during 2007. Approximately $7.1 million and $2.2 million of the increase in depreciation expense in 2007 and 2006, respectively, is attributable to a reduction in the estimated useful lives of certain DME equipment attributable to provisions contained in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 that change the Medicare reimbursement methodology for items of DME in the capped rental payment category (see “Medicare Reimbursement”).

     During 2007, we amortized $0.3 million of intangible assets compared with $1.5 million in 2006 and $1.7 million in 2005. Our net intangible assets were $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2007. Of this total, $0.4 million (consisting of various covenants not-to-compete) is being amortized over periods of one to seven years, as the remainder represents goodwill.

Operating Income

     As shown in the table below, operating income for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased $36.1 million when compared to the prior year. The increase in operating income in 2007 is attributable primarily to revenue growth from increases in customer volumes partially offset by higher costs and expenses as noted above. The decrease in operating income in 2006 is attributable to several factors, including the negative impact on our net revenues resulting from reduced Medicare payment rates for inhalation drugs and related dispensing fees that took effect on January 1, 2006 and the reduction of Medicare reimbursement rates for oxygen equipment that took effect on April 1, 2005, and higher reported SG&A expenses due to the required adoption of SFAS No. 123R and the resulting recognition of $20.3 million of stock-based compensation expense during the year.

Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
(In thousands)
Operating income      $383,148      $347,059      $351,780
Percentage of net revenues 24.0% 24.6% 27.8%

Interest Expense

     Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $26.5 million, compared to $9.9 million and $12.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest expense in 2007 was higher than interest expense in 2006 due to the placement of $550.0 million of convertible senior debentures in the fourth quarter of 2007 and higher average balances outstanding under our revolving credit facility. Interest expense in 2006 was lower than the prior year due to the full year effect of the repayment of $45.0 million of 9.11% Senior Secured Notes in September of 2005. Included in interest expense is amortization of debt issuance costs of $5.7 million, $1.0 million and $0.7 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

23


Income Taxes

     Our effective income tax rate was 37.3% for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 compared with 37.7% for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Acquisitions

     In 2007, the Company acquired certain operating assets of three companies resulting in the addition of one new operating center. The aggregate cost of these acquisitions was $6.0 million and was allocated to acquired assets as follows: $0.3 million to current assets, $0.1 million to property and equipment, and $5.6 million to goodwill.

     In 2006, the Company acquired certain operating assets of ten companies resulting in the addition of 48 new operating centers. The aggregate cost of these acquisitions was $72.5 million and was allocated to acquired assets as follows: $8.7 million to current assets, $5.6 million to property and equipment, $0.2 million to separately identifiable intangible assets, and $58.0 million to goodwill.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Our primary sources of liquidity have been internally generated funds from operations, borrowings under credit facilities and proceeds from equity and debt transactions. We have used these funds to meet our capital requirements, which consist primarily of operating costs, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service and share repurchases.

     At December 31, 2007, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $72.3 million, resulting in negative working capital as compared to positive working capital of $52.8 million at December 31, 2006. The decline in working capital is primarily attributable to the reclassification of our $275.0 million principal amount of 3.0% Convertible Debentures due 2033 (the “Debentures”) to a current liability due to the right of the holders to put the securities to us for cash within one year of the December 31, 2007 balance sheet.

     Net cash provided by operating activities was $406.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared with $328.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $370.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. A significant portion of our assets consists of accounts receivable from third party payors that are responsible for payment for the equipment and services we provide. Our DSO was 43 days as of December 31, 2007 and 42 days as of December 31, 2006. We measure our DSO by dividing our net accounts receivable at the balance sheet date by the product of our latest quarterly net revenues times four, multiplied by 360 days.

     Net cash used in investing and financing activities was $379.5 million, $312.2 million and $395.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Activity in the year ended December 31, 2007 included our investment of $4.8 million in business acquisitions, net investment in property and equipment of $129.8 million, payments of debt of $264.1 million, proceeds of $755.4 million from the issuance of debt, proceeds of $41.1 million from the exercise of stock options and issuance of common shares and $673.4 million in payments to repurchase our common stock.

     As of December 31, 2007, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of approximately $51.7 million of cash and cash equivalents, $98.3 million of short-term investments and $356.5 million available under our revolving credit agreement. The revolving credit agreement, dated December 1, 2006, makes available to us up to $390.0 million over a five-year period, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the agreement. As of December 31, 2007, there were $10.0 million of borrowings and $23.5 million of standby letters of credit issued under the credit facility.

     At December 31, 2007, the Company held $98.3 million of investment grade auction rate securities. These securities are variable-rate debt instruments with contractual maturities between the years 2020 and 2041 with interest rates that reset every seven or 35 days pursuant to a bidding process as determined by the underlying security indentures. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” the investments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses included in comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders' equity. The book value of available-for-sale investments held at December 31, 2007, approximated fair value. Therefore, the Company had no reported unrealized gains and losses. The Company did not hold any available-for-sale investments at December 31, 2006.

     Of the auction rate securities held as of December 31, 2007, $88.2 million are secured by pools of student loans guaranteed by state-designated guaranty agencies or monoline insurers or reinsured by the United States government. The remaining $10.0 million was comprised of securities backed by pools of municipal bonds. All of the auction rate securities held by the company are senior obligations under the applicable indentures authorizing the issuance of such securities. Recent turmoil in the credit markets has resulted in widespread failures to attract demand for such securities at the periodic auction dates occurring subsequent to December 31, 2007. While all of the auctions involving all of the securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2007, were successful during January 2008, auctions involving $80.0 million of these securities failed to attract sufficient demand in February 2008, resulting in our continuing to hold such securities.

24


     We will continue to monitor credit market conditions to assess the liquidity of our short-term investments. Due to our ability to access our cash and cash equivalents, amounts available under our revolving credit facility, and our expected operating cash flows, we believe that we have adequate liquidity available to meet our obligations.

     On February 14, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase plan whereby the Company may repurchase from time to time, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, shares of the Company’s common stock in amounts determined pursuant to a formula (the “share repurchase formula”) that takes into account both the ratio of the Company’s net debt to cash flow and its available cash resources and borrowing availability. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company repurchased and retired 18,423,994 shares for $673.4 million pursuant to the repurchase plan. On January 23, 2007 and October 23, 2007, our Board of Directors approved modifications to the share repurchase formula to increase the ratio of debt to cash flow to allow additional share repurchases. As of December 31, 2007, $310.6 million of the Company’s common stock was eligible for repurchase in accordance with the amended formula.

     On October 31, 2007, we completed the sale of $275.0 million principal amount (including exercise of a $25.0 million over-allotment option) of convertible senior debentures due 2037 – Series A (the “Series A Debentures”) and $275.0 million principal amount (including exercise of a $25.0 million over-allotment option) of convertible senior debentures due 2037 – Series B (the “Series B Debentures” and together with the Series A Debentures, the “Series Debentures”) in a private placement. The Series Debentures will pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 2.75% per annum. The Series Debentures are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and will be convertible under specified circumstances based upon a base conversion rate, which, under certain circumstances, will be increased pursuant to a formula that is subject to a maximum conversion rate. Upon conversion, holders of the Series Debentures will receive cash up to the principal amount, and any excess conversion value will be delivered in shares of our common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of common stock, at our option. The initial base conversion rate for the Debentures is 19.5044 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Series Debentures, equivalent to an initial base conversion price of approximately $51.27 per share. In addition, if at the time of conversion the applicable price of our common stock exceeds the base conversion price, holders of the Series A Debentures and Series B Debentures will receive an additional number of shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Debentures, as determined pursuant to a specified formula. We will have the right to redeem the Series A Debentures and the Series B Debentures at any time after November 1, 2012 and November 1, 2014, respectively. Holders of the Series Debentures will have the right to require us to repurchase for cash all or some of their Series Debentures upon the occurrence of certain fundamental change transactions or on November 1, 2012, 2017, 2022, 2027 and 2032 in the case of the Series A Debentures and November 1, 2014, 2017, 2022, 2027 and 2032 in the case of the Series B Debentures.

     On June 11, 2003, we completed the sale of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.0% Convertible Senior Debentures due 2033 (the “Debentures”) in a private placement. The Debentures are convertible into shares of our common stock based on a conversion rate of 18.7515 shares for each $1,000 principal amount of Debentures. This is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $53.33 per share of common stock. On June 23, 2003, we sold an additional $25.0 million principal amount of Debentures pursuant to the exercise in full of an over-allotment option granted to the initial purchasers of the Debentures. The Debentures are convertible into common stock in any calendar quarter if, among other circumstances, the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of our previous calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 120% of the applicable conversion price per share ($64.00 per share) of our common stock on such last trading day. Interest on the Debentures is payable at the rate of 3.0% per annum on June 15 and December 15 of each year. The Debentures are senior unsecured obligations and will mature on June 15, 2033. The Debentures are redeemable by us on or after June 15, 2008 and may be put to us for repurchase on June 15, 2008, 2010, 2013, or 2018.

     Our future liquidity will continue to be dependent upon our operating cash flow and management of accounts receivable. We anticipate that funds generated from operations, together with our current cash on hand and funds available under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to finance our working capital requirements, fund anticipated acquisitions and capital expenditures, and meet our contractual obligations for at least the next 12 months.

      Accounts Receivable: The Company maintains payor-specific price tables in its billing system that reflect the fee schedule amounts statutorily in effect or contractually agreed upon by various government and commercial payors for each item of equipment or supply provided to a customer. Due to the nature of the health care industry and the reimbursement environment in which Lincare operates, situations can occur where expected payment amounts are not established by fee schedules or contracted rates, and estimates are required to record revenues and accounts receivable at their net realizable values. Inherent in these estimates is the risk that revenues and accounts receivable will have to be revised or updated as additional information becomes available. Contractual adjustments to revenues and accounts receivable can result from

25


price differences between allowed charges and amounts initially recognized as revenue due to incorrect price tables or subsequently negotiated payment rates. Actual adjustments that result from differences between the payment amount received and the expected realizable amount are recorded against the allowance for sales adjustments and are typically identified and ultimately recorded at the point of cash application or account review. We report revenues in our financial statements net of such adjustments. Accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for sales adjustments and uncollectible accounts. Bad debt is recorded as an operating expense and consists of billed charges that are ultimately deemed uncollectible due to the customer’s or third-party payor’s inability or refusal to pay.

     The Company’s payor mix is highly concentrated among Medicare, Medicaid and other government third-party payors and contracted private insurance or commercial payors. Government payment rates are determined according to published fee schedules established pursuant to statute, law or other regulatory processes and commercial payment rates are based on contractual line item pricing as reflected in the respective contracts. Fee schedule updates have historically occurred on a prospective basis and have been made available to the Company in advance of the effective date of a change in reimbursement rates. The Company’s proprietary billing system has features that allow the Company to timely update payor price tables within the system as changes occur in order to accurately record revenues and accounts receivable at their expected realizable values. Additional systems and manual controls and processes are used by management to evaluate the accuracy of these recorded amounts. Based on the Company’s experience, it is unlikely that a change in estimate of unsettled amounts from third party payors would have a material adverse impact on its financial position or results of operations.

     Accounts receivable balance concentrations by major payor category as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows:

Percentage of Accounts Receivable Outstanding:     
  December 31, December 31,
       2007      2006
Medicare        36.8 %            40.1 %     
Medicaid/Other Government  17.8 %    12.5 % 
Private Insurance  37.4 %  38.1 % 
Self-Pay  8.0 %  9.3 % 
     Total  100.0 %  100.0 % 

      Aged accounts receivable balances by major payor category as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows:

  December 31, 2007
Percentage of Accounts Aged in Days:        
       0-60      61-120      Over 120
Medicare        77.0 %            10.5 %              12.5 %     
Medicaid/Other Government    50.1 %    20.7 %  29.2 % 
Private Insurance  60.8 %  15.0 %  24.2 % 
Self-Pay  51.4 %  26.6 %  22.0 % 
     All Payors  64.1 %  15.3 %  20.6 % 
 
 
  December 31, 2006
Percentage of Accounts Aged in Days:        
  0-60 61-120 Over 120
Medicare  80.3 %  10.1 %  9.6 % 
Medicaid/Other Government  65.6 %  18.3 %  16.1 % 
Private Insurance  61.6 %  15.0 %  23.4 % 
Self-Pay  53.8 %  21.5 %  24.7 % 
     All Payors  68.9 %  14.0 %  17.1 % 

     The Company operates 33 regional billing and collection offices (“RBCOs”) that are responsible for the billing and collection of accounts receivable. The RBCOs are aligned geographically to support the accounts receivable activity of the operating centers within their assigned territories. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, there were 1,322 and 1,262 full-time employees in the RBCOs. Accounts receivable collections are performed by designated collectors within each of the RBCOs. The collectors use various reporting tools available within the Company’s proprietary billing system to identify claims that have been denied or partially paid by the responsible party and claims that have not been processed by the third-party payor in a timely manner. Collections of accounts receivable are typically pursued using direct phone contact to

26


determine the reason for non-payment and, if necessary, corrected claims are prepared for resubmission and further follow-up with the responsible party. In some cases, third-party payors have developed electronic inquiry methods that the Company can access to determine the status of individual claims. The Company has benefited from the increasing availability of electronic funds transfers from payors, which now account for approximately 68% of all payments received. The Company believes that its collection procedures contribute to its accounts receivable days sales outstanding (“DSO”) and bad debt expense being among the lowest in its industry, according to published industry data and public filings of some of its competitors.

     The ultimate collection of accounts receivable may not be known for several months. We record bad debt expense based on a percentage of revenue using historical Company-specific data. The percentage and amounts used to record bad debt expense and the allowance for doubtful accounts are supported by various methods and analyses, including current and historical cash collections, bad debt write-offs, aged accounts receivable and consideration of any payor-specific concerns. The ultimate write-off of an accounts receivable occurs once collection procedures are determined to have been exhausted by the collector and after appropriate review of the specific account and approval by supervisory and/or management employees within the RBCOs. Management and RBCO supervisory and management employees also review accounts receivable write-off reports, correspondence from payors and individual account information to evaluate and correct processes that might have contributed to an unsuccessful collection effort.

     The Company does not use an aging threshold for account receivable write-offs. However, the age of an account balance may provide an indication that collection procedures have been exhausted, and would be considered in the review and approval of an account balance write-off.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Future Minimum Obligations

     In the normal course of business, we enter into obligations and commitments that require future contractual payments. The commitments primarily result from repayment obligations for borrowings under our revolving bank credit facility and Debentures, as well as contractual lease payments for facility, vehicle, and equipment leases and deferred acquisition obligations. The following table presents, in aggregate, scheduled payments under our contractual obligations (in thousands):

  Fiscal Years      
       2008      2009      2010      2011      2012      Thereafter      Total
Short-term debt $ 12,900 $ $ $ $   $  $ 12,900
Capital lease commitments  144 150 13   307
Long-term debt (1)   275,000     275,000   275,000 825,000
Interest expense  20,027 15,616   15,613 15,572   15,125   15,125   97,078
Operating leases  39,230 26,416 15,008 5,503 1,502   195 87,854
Employment Agreements    1,943   1,943         3,886
Taxes & related interest and penalties (2)    577              577
     Total      $ 349,821     $ 44,125     $ 30,634     $ 21,075     $ 291,627       $  290,320   $ 1,027,602

      (1)       Amounts include the Debentures due 2033 that are redeemable by us on or after June 15, 2008, and may be put to us for repurchase on June 15, 2008, 2010, 2013, or 2018. The Debentures are shown in the table as scheduled for repurchase in 2008 as a result of the put feature. Amounts also include the Series Debentures due 2037. The Series A Debentures are redeemable by us on or after November 1, 2012, and may be put to us for repurchase on November 1, 2012, 2017, 2022, 2027 and 2032. The Series A Debentures are shown in the table as scheduled for repurchase in 2012 as a result of the put feature. The Series B Debentures are redeemable by us on or after November 1, 2014, and may be put to us for repurchase on November 1, 2014, 2017, 2022, 2027 and 2032.
 
(2) The Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of $17.7 million of which we anticipate payment settlement of $0.6 million during 2008. We are unable to determine a reasonable estimate of the payment settlement date or the settlement amount for the remaining balance of $17.1 million in unrecognized tax benefits.

27


New Accounting Standards

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer in a business combination, including business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisition), to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values of that date, with limited exceptions. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. The provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) are effective as of the beginning of the 2009 calendar year. The Company is currently evaluating the potential future impact of this standard on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective as of the beginning of the 2008 calendar year. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

     In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which permits an entity to choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value at specified election dates. A company will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings on items for which the fair value option has been elected after adoption. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 are effective as of the beginning of the 2008 calendar year. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Inflation

     We do not anticipate any material increases in either the cost of supplies or operating expenses due to inflation. With reductions in reimbursement by government and private medical insurance programs and pressure to contain the costs of such programs, we bear the risk that reimbursement rates set by such programs will not keep pace with inflation.

Segment Information

     We follow Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” SFAS No. 131 utilizes the “management” approach for determining reportable segments. The management approach designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of our reportable segments. We maintain a decentralized approach to management of our local business operations. Decentralization of managerial decision-making enables our operating centers to respond promptly and effectively to local market demands and opportunities. We provide home health care equipment and services through 1,019 operating centers in 47 states. We view each operating center as a distinct part of a single “operating segment,” as each operating center generally provides the same products to customers. As a result, all of our operating centers are aggregated into one reportable segment.

28


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     The fair values of our debt instruments are subject to change as a result of changes in market prices or interest rates. We estimate potential changes in the fair value of interest rate sensitive financial instruments based on a hypothetical increase in interest rates. Our use of this methodology to quantify the market risk of such instruments should not be construed as an endorsement of its accuracy or the accuracy of the related assumptions. The quantitative information about market risk is necessarily limited because it does not take into account anticipated operating and financial transactions.

     The following table sets forth the estimated fair value of our long-term obligations (and current portions thereof) and our estimate of the impact from a 10 percent increase in interest rates on the fair value of such obligations and the associated change in annual interest expense.

Market Risk Sensitive Instruments — Interest Rate Sensitivity
 
        (Assuming 10% Increase in
        Interest Rates)
            Hypothetical
            Change in
(dollars in thousands)        Hypothetical Annual
  Face Carrying Fair Change in Interest
        Amount       Amount       Value       Fair Value       Expense
As of December 31, 2007:                
     Debentures   $ 275,000   $ 275,000   $ 273,597   $ (467 )     $
     Series A Debentures   275,000   275,000   290,482   (1,815 )  
     Series B Debentures   275,000 275,000 288,337   (2,117 )  
     Deferred acquisition obligations 2,900 2,900 2,900      
     Revolving bank credit facility 10,000 10,000 10,000       57
     Capital lease obligations 307 307 307      
As of December 31, 2006:              
     Debentures $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 271,563 $ (1,948 ) $
     Deferred acquisition obligations 10,611 10,611 10,611      
     Revolving bank credit facility 60,000 60,000 60,000     351
     Capital lease obligations 436 436 436      

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     The financial statements required by this item are listed in Item 15(a)(1) and are submitted at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The supplementary data required by this item is included on page S-1. The financial statements and supplementary data are herein incorporated by reference.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

     The Company has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on its evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      Lincare’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only

29


reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the underlying policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including Lincare’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Lincare conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

     Based on Lincare’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.

     Lincare’s registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report on Lincare’s internal control over financial reporting.

(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     There has been no change in Lincare’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Lincare’s internal control over financial reporting.

30


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lincare Holdings Inc.:

We have audited Lincare Holdings Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Lincare Holdings Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Lincare Holdings Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Lincare Holdings Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated February 27, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP
 
Tampa, Florida
February 27, 2008
Certified Public Accountants
 

Item 9B. Other Information

     None.

31


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons

     Information required to be furnished by Item 401 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), will be included in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2008, and is herein incorporated by reference.

Audit Committee

     The Company has a standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. Additional information regarding the Audit Committee will be included in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2008, and is herein incorporated by reference.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

     The Board of Directors has designated William F. Miller, III as the “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act and has determined that he is independent as defined in the listing standards applicable to the Company.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

     Information required to be furnished by Item 405 of Regulation S-K will be included in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2008, and is herein incorporated by reference.

Code of Ethics

     The Company has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to its directors and officers (including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions) as well as its employees. Copies of the Company’s code of ethics are available without charge upon written request directed to Corporate Secretary, Lincare Holdings Inc., 19387 U.S. 19 North, Clearwater, Florida 33764.

Nominating Committee

     Information required to be furnished by Item 407(c)(3) of Regulation S-K will be included in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2008, and is herein incorporated by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

     Information required to be furnished by Item 402 of Regulation S-K and paragraphs (e)(4) and (e)(5) of Item 407 of Regulation S-K regarding executive compensation will be included in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2008, and is herein incorporated by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

     Information required to be furnished by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K and by Item 403 of Regulation S-K will be included in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2008, and is herein incorporated by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

     Information required to be furnished by Item 404 of Regulation S-K and Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K will be included in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2008, and is herein incorporated by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     Information required to be furnished by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A will be included in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2008, and is herein incorporated by reference.

32


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

     (a) (1) The following consolidated financial statements of Lincare Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries are filed as part of this Form 10-K starting at page F-1:

     Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2007 and 2006

     Consolidated Statements of Operations — Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity — Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

          (2) The following consolidated financial statement schedule of Lincare Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries is included in this Form 10-K at page S-1:

     Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

     All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.

          (3) Exhibits included or incorporated herein:

     See Exhibit Index.

 

33


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
  LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. 
 
Date: February 27, 2008  /s/ PAUL G. GABOS
  Paul G. Gabos 
  Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and 
  Principal Accounting Officer 

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature          Position          Date 
  Director, Chief   
/s/ JOHN P. BYRNES  Executive Officer and Principal  February 27, 2008 
John P. Byrnes  Executive Officer     
 
/s/ PAUL G. GABOS  Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and   
Paul G. Gabos  Principal Accounting Officer  February 27, 2008 
 
*     
Chester B. Black  Director  February 27, 2008 
 
*     
William F. Miller, III  Director  February 27, 2008 
 
*     
Frank D. Byrne, M.D.  Director  February 27, 2008 
 
*     
Stuart H. Altman, Ph.D.  Director  February 27, 2008 

*By: /s/ PAUL G. GABOS 
  Attorney in fact 

 

34


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lincare Holdings Inc.:

     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lincare Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule on page S-1. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and this financial statement schedule based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lincare Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

     As discussed in Notes 1(t) and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, and as discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of quantifying errors in 2006.

     As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.

     We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Lincare Holdings Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)”), and our report dated February 27, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP
 
Tampa, Florida
February 27, 2008
Certified Public Accountants

 

F-1



LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
        2007       2006
ASSETS (In thousands, except share data)
Current assets:        
     Cash and cash equivalents  $ 51,707 $ 25,075
     Short-term investments (note 2)   98,250  
     Accounts receivable, net (note 3)   198,918     170,533
     Income tax receivable     3,399   13,474
     Inventories   8,971   8,354
     Prepaid and other current assets   4,359   5,239
     Deferred income taxes   607   19,604
          Total current assets   366,211   242,279
Property and equipment, net (note 4)   340,151   321,325
Other assets:         
     Goodwill   1,208,370   1,203,012
     Other   13,632   8,694
          Total other assets   1,222,002   1,211,706
               Total assets    $ 1,928,364  $ 1,775,310
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
     Current installments of long-term obligations (note 6)  $ 288,044  $ 71,047
     Accounts payable   60,245   44,166
     Accrued expenses:        
     Compensation and benefits   22,134   20,638
     Liability insurance   15,806   12,757
     Other current liabilities (note 8)   52,245   40,856
          Total current liabilities   438,474   189,464
Long-term obligations, excluding current installments (note 6)   550,163   275,000
Deferred income taxes and other taxes   205,939   200,269
          Total liabilities   1,194,576   664,733
Commitments and contingencies (notes 5, 6 and 15)        
Stockholders’ equity (notes 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11):        
     Common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized 200,000,000 shares;        
          issued: 74,193,793 in 2007, 90,299,413 in 2006   742   903
     Additional paid-in capital   456,437   386,201
     Retained earnings   276,609   723,473
          Total stockholders’ equity   733,788   1,110,577
               Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity  $ 1,928,364 $ 1,775,310

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2



LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
 
 
       2007      2006      2005
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Net revenues (note 12)    $  1,595,990     $  1,409,795     $  1,266,627  
Costs and expenses:           
     Cost of goods and services  389,884   316,103     253,260  
     Operating expenses    365,016   331,897     295,807  
     Selling, general and administrative expenses  317,722   291,623     251,839  
     Bad debt expense  23,940   21,147     18,999  
     Depreciation expense    116,020   100,499     93,260  
     Amortization expense    260     1,467      1,682  
    1,212,842       1,062,736     914,847  
          Operating income    383,148     347,059      351,780  
Other income (expenses):         
     Interest income  4,063   2,719     3,718  
     Interest expense    (26,543 )   (9,935 )    (12,432 )
    (22,480 )   (7,216 )    (8,714 )
          Income before income taxes  360,668   339,843     343,066  
Income tax expense (note 7)    134,591     126,862      129,370  
          Net income  $ 226,077   $ 212,981   $ 213,696  
Income per common share (note 13):         
     Basic  $ 2.71   $ 2.26   $ 2.16  
     Diluted  $ 2.58   $ 2.16   $ 2.06  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding    83,387     94,209      98,913  
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding    89,688     101,106      106,306  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3



LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
 
    Shares of                                                
    Common           Additional                           Total
    Stock   Common   Paid-in   Unearned   Retained   Treasury   Stockholders’
      Issued     Stock     Capital     Compensation     Earnings     Stock     Equity
    (In thousands)
Balances at December 31, 2004             124,900           $ 1,250        $ 278,884        $      (6,184 )      $ 1,415,604        $ (523,229 )      $ 1,166,325  
Exercise of stock options (note 11)   2,741       27       48,633                         48,660  
Shares issued through ESPP    52             1,723                         1,723  
Vesting of restricted stock    22                   2,862                   2,862  
Treasury stock adjustment                1,751                   (1,751 )      
Common stock acquired                                  (321,910 )     (321,910 )
Tax benefit for exercise                                                      
     of employee stock                                                      
     awards (notes 7 and 11)                26,520                         26,520  
Net income                            213,696             213,696  
Balances at December 31, 2005   127,715       1,277       357,511       (3,322 )     1,629,300       (846,890 )     1,137,876  
SAB 108 cumulative                                                      
     adjustment (note 9)                           (27,616 )           (27,616 )
Adjusted balances at                                                      
     January 1, 2006    127,715       1,277       357,511       (3,322 )     1,601,684       (846,890 )     1,110,260  
Exercise of stock options (note 11)   529       5       11,826                         11,831  
Shares issued through ESPP    42       1       1,361                         1,362  
Vesting of restricted stock    90       1       (1 )                        
Reclass stock compensation                (3,322 )     3,322                    
Common stock acquired                                  (246,682 )     (246,682 )
Common stock retired    (38,077 )     (381 )     (1,999 )           (1,091,192 )     1,093,572        
Stock-based compensation expense               20,268                         20,268  
Tax benefit for exercise                                                      
     of employee stock                                                      
     awards (notes 7 and 11)                557                         557  
Net income                            212,981             212,981  
Balances at December 31, 2006   90,299       903       386,201             723,473             1,110,577  
Adoption of FIN 48 (note 7)                            (643 )           (643 )
Exercise of stock options (note 11)   1,887       19       39,763                         39,782  
Shares issued through ESPP    43             1,361                         1,361  
Issuance of restricted stock    412       4                               4  
Forfeitures of restricted stock    (23 )                                    
Common stock acquired                                    (673,449 )     (673,449 )
Common stock retired    (18,424 )     (184 )     (967 )           (672,298 )     673,449        
Stock-based compensation expense               18,039                         18,039  
Tax benefit for exercise                                                      
     of employee stock                                                      
     awards (notes 7 and 11)                12,040                         12,040  
Net income                            226,077             226,077  
Balances at December 31, 2007   74,194     $ 742           $ 456,437           $     $ 276,609     $         $ 733,788  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

      2007       2006       2005
Cash flows from operating activities: (In thousands)
       Net income         $ 226,077           $ 212,981           $ 213,696
       Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
              Bad debt expense 23,940 21,147 18,999
              Depreciation expense 116,020 100,499 93,260
              Net loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment 160 (63 ) 387
              Amortization expense 260 1,467 1,682
              Amortization of debt issuance costs 5,706 953 738
              Stock-based compensation expense 18,039 20,268 2,862
              Deferred income taxes 24,580 18,227 15,701
              Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation (4,988 ) (1,116 )
              Minority interest in net earnings of subsidiary  79
              Change in assets and liabilities net of effects of acquired businesses:
                     Increase in accounts receivable (52,307 ) (49,642 ) (21,276 )
                     Increase in inventories (541 ) (3,596 ) (1,809 )
                     Decrease (increase) in prepaid and other assets  749 (2,430 ) (33 )
                     Increase in accounts payable 11,002 3,209 14,161
                     Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses 15,355 23,822 (5,933 )
                     Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable 22,115 (17,039 ) 37,437
                            Net cash provided by operating activities 406,167 328,687 369,951
Cash flows from investing activities:
       Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 13,052 154 7,052
       Capital expenditures (142,898 ) (106,148 ) (110,997 )
       Purchases of short-term investments (249,180 ) (272,130 ) (360,950 )
       Sales and maturities of short-term investments  150,930 310,555 514,700
       Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired and purchase price adjustments (note 14) (4,775 ) (60,068 ) (93,326 )
       Changes in cash restricted for future payments  49 10
                            Net cash used in investing activities (232,871 ) (127,588 ) (43,511 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
       Proceeds from issuance of debt 755,435 61,000 112
       Payments of principal on debt (264,053 ) (12,184 ) (79,046 )
       Decrease in minority interest (783 )
       Payments of debt issuance costs (10,732 ) (1,011 ) (266 )
       Proceeds from exercise of stock options and issuance of common shares 41,147 13,193 50,383
       Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation  4,988 1,116
       Payments to acquire treasury stock (673,449 ) (246,682 ) (321,910 )
                            Net cash used in financing activities (146,664 ) (184,568 ) (351,510 )
                            Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 26,632 16,531 (25,070 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 25,075 8,544 33,614
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 51,707 $ 25,075 $ 8,544
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
                            Cash paid for interest $ 18,319 $ 9,812 $ 13,004
                            Cash paid for income taxes $ 102,333 $ 108,252 $ 75,914
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
                            Assets acquired under capital lease $ 435 $ $ 815

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

(1) Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     (a) Description of Business

     Lincare Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) provides oxygen, respiratory therapy services, infusion therapy services and home medical equipment such as hospital beds, wheelchairs and other medical supplies to the home health care market. The Company’s customers are serviced from locations in 47 states. The Company’s equipment and supplies are readily available and the Company is not dependent on a single supplier or even a few suppliers.

     (b) Use of Estimates

     Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates. It is at least reasonably possible that a change in those estimates will occur in the near term.

     (c) Basis of Presentation

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lincare Holdings Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts in the prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

     In fiscal year 2006 and 2005, $63,000 net gains and $387,000 net losses, respectively, related to the disposal of property and equipment were reclassified to operating expenses.

     (d) Revenue Recognition

     The Company’s revenues are recognized on an accrual basis in the period in which services and related products are provided to customers and are recorded at net realizable amounts estimated to be paid by customers and third-party payors. The Company’s billing system contains payor-specific price tables that reflect the fee schedule amounts in effect or contractually agreed upon by various government and commercial payors for each item of equipment or supply provided to a customer. The Company has established an allowance to account for sales adjustments that result from differences between the payment amount received and the expected realizable amount. Actual adjustments that result from differences between the payment amount received and the expected realizable amount are recorded against the allowance for sales adjustments and are typically identified and ultimately recorded at the point of cash application or when otherwise determined pursuant to the Company’s collection procedures. The Company reports revenues in its financial statements net of such adjustments.

      Certain items provided by the Company are reimbursed under rental arrangements that generally provide for fixed monthly payments established by fee schedules for as long as the patient is using the equipment and medical necessity continues (subject to capped rental arrangements which limit the rental payment periods in some instances and which may result in a transfer of title to the equipment at the end of the rental payment period). Once initial delivery of rental equipment is made to the patient, a monthly billing cycle is established based on the initial date of delivery. The Company recognizes rental arrangement revenues ratably over the monthly service period and defers revenue for the portion of the monthly bill which is unearned. No separate payment is earned from the initial equipment delivery and setup process. During the rental period we are responsible for servicing the equipment and providing routine maintenance, if necessary.

     The Company’s revenue recognition policy is consistent with the criteria set forth in Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”) for determining when revenue is realized or realizable and earned. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the requirements of SAB 104 that:

  • persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
     
  • delivery has occurred;
     
  • the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and
     
  • collectibility is reasonably assured.

F-6


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     Due to the nature of the industry and the reimbursement environment in which the Company operates, certain estimates are required to record net revenues and accounts receivable at their net realizable values at the time products are provided. Inherent in these estimates is the risk that they will have to be revised or updated as additional information becomes available. Specifically, the complexity of many third-party billing arrangements and the uncertainty of reimbursement amounts for certain services from certain payors may result in adjustments to amounts originally recorded. Such adjustments are typically identified and recorded by the Company at the point of cash application, claim denial or account review. Included in accounts receivable are earned but unbilled accounts receivable from earned revenues.

      Unbilled accounts receivable represent charges for equipment and supplies delivered to customers for which invoices have not yet been generated by the billing system. Prior to the delivery of equipment and supplies to customers, the Company performs certain certification and approval procedures to ensure collection is reasonably assured. Once the items are delivered, unbilled accounts receivable are recorded at net amounts expected to be paid by customers and third-party payors. Billing delays, ranging from several weeks to several months, can occur due to delays in obtaining certain required payor-specific documentation from internal and external sources as well as interim transactions occurring between cycle billing dates established for each customer within the billing system, and business acquisitions awaiting assignment of new provider enrollment identification numbers. In the event that a third-party payor does not accept the claim, the customer is ultimately responsible. Accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for sales adjustments and uncollectible accounts. Sales adjustments are recorded against revenues and result from differences between the payment amount received and the expected realizable amount. Bad debt is recorded as an operating expense and consists of billed charges that are ultimately deemed uncollectible due to the customer’s or third-party payor’s inability or refusal to pay.

     The Company performs analyses to evaluate the net realizable value of accounts receivable. Specifically, the Company considers historical realization data, accounts receivable aging trends, other operating trends and relevant business conditions. Because of continuing changes in the health care industry and third-party reimbursement, it is possible that the Company’s estimates could change, which could have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

     The Company accounts for taxes imposed on revenue producing transactions by government authorities on a net basis.

     (e) Cash and Cash Equivalents

     For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents.

     (f) Short-term Investments

     The Company classifies its investments in marketable securities with readily determinable fair values as investments available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”. Available-for-sale securities consist of auction rate securities not classified as trading securities or as securities to be held to maturity. The Company has classified all investments as available-for-sale. There were no unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities in the periods presented.

     At December 31, 2007, the Company held $98.3 million of investment grade auction rate securities. These securities are variable-rate debt instruments with contractual maturities between the years 2020 and 2041 with interest rates that reset every seven or 35 days pursuant to a bidding process as determined by the underlying security indentures. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” the investments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses included in comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders' equity. The book value of available-for-sale investments held at December 31, 2007, approximated fair value. Therefore, the Company had no reported unrealized gains and losses. The Company did not hold any available-for-sale investments at December 31, 2006.

     Of the auction rate securities held as of December 31, 2007, $88.3 million are secured by pools of student loans guaranteed by state-designated guaranty agencies or monoline insurers or reinsured by the United States government. The remaining $10.0 million was comprised of securities backed by pools of municipal bonds. All of the auction rate securities held by the company are senior obligations under the applicable indentures authorizing the issuance of such securities. Recent turmoil in the credit markets has resulted in widespread failures

F-7


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

to attract demand for such securities at the periodic auction dates occurring subsequent to December 31, 2007. While all of the auctions involving all of the securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2007, were successful during January 2008, auctions involving $80.0 million of these securities failed to attract sufficient demand in February 2008, resulting in our continuing to hold such securities.

     We will continue to monitor credit market conditions to assess the liquidity of our short-term investments. Due to our ability to access our cash and cash equivalents, amounts available under our revolving credit facility, and our expected operating cash flows, we believe that we have adequate liquidity available to meet our obligations.

     (g) Financial Instruments

     The Company believes the book value of its cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, income taxes receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The book value of the Company’s revolving credit agreement and deferred acquisition obligations approximate their fair value as the applicable interest rates approximate rates at which similar types of borrowing arrangements could be currently obtained by the Company. The fair value of the Company’s 3.0% Debentures due 2033, 2.75% Series A Debentures due 2037 and 2.75% Series B Debentures due 2037 are estimated based on several standard market variables including the Company’s stock price, yield to put/call through conversion and yield to maturity. The estimated fair value of the Debentures at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $273,597,500 and $271,562,500, respectively. The fair value of the Series A and Series B Debentures at December 31, 2007 was $290,482,500 and $288,337,500, respectively.

     (h) Inventories

     Inventories, consisting of equipment, supplies and replacement parts, are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventories are charged to cost of goods and services in the period in which products and related services are provided to customers.

     (i) Property and Equipment

     Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation on property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as set forth in the table below.

Building and improvements       1 year to 39 years
Medical rental equipment 1 year to 11 years
Other equipment and furniture 3 years to 25 years

     Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. Amortization of leasehold improvements is included with depreciation expense.

     (j) Goodwill

     Goodwill results from the excess of cost over identifiable net assets of acquired businesses.

     On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives no longer be amortized but instead be measured for impairment at least annually, or when events indicate that an impairment may exist. As of the adoption date, amortization of outstanding goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets ceased. As required by SFAS No. 142, the Company performed its annual impairment test on September 30, 2007. The Company has determined that it has one reporting unit under SFAS No. 142. For the three year period ending December 31, 2007, the Company performed its annual impairment review of goodwill and concluded that there was no impairment in any of the years.

     (k) Other Assets

     Other assets principally include capitalized costs of borrowing which are being amortized over the term of the respective debt on the effective interest method.

F-8


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     (l) Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

     In accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

     (m) Income Taxes

     Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

     (n) Advertising Costs

     Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred and are included in selling expenses.

     (o) Cost of Goods and Services

     Cost of goods and services includes the cost of equipment (excluding depreciation of $82.6 million, $68.7 million and $62.3 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively), drugs and supplies sold to patients and certain operating costs related to the Company’s respiratory drug product line. These costs include an allocation of customer service, distribution and administrative costs relating to the respiratory drug product line of approximately $48.8 million, $49.2 million and $50.0 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included in cost of goods and services are salary and related expenses of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians of $10.5 million, $10.3 million and $10.2 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

     (p) Operating Expenses

     The Company manages over 1,000 operating centers from which customers are provided equipment, supplies and services. An operating center averages approximately seven to eight employees and is typically comprised of a center manager, two customer service representatives (referred to as “CSR’s” – telephone intake, scheduling, documentation), two or three service representatives (referred to as “Service Reps” – delivery, maintenance and retrieval of equipment and delivery of disposables), a respiratory therapist (non-reimbursable and discretionary clinical follow-up with the customer and communication to the prescribing physician) and a sales representative (marketing calls to local physicians and other referral sources).

     The Company includes in operating expenses the costs incurred at the Company’s operating centers for certain service personnel (center manager, CSR’s and Service Reps), facilities (rent, utilities, communications, property taxes, etc.), vehicles (vehicle leases, gasoline, repair and maintenance), and general business supplies and miscellaneous expenses. Operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 within these major categories were as follows:

F-9


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Operating Expenses ( in thousands) Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
Salary and related    $ 232,579    $ 208,994    $ 185,435
Facilities 55,617 51,914 49,451
Vehicles 45,120 40,598 34,982
General supplies/miscellaneous 31,700 30,391 25,939
       Total $ 365,016 $ 331,897 $ 295,807

     Included in operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2007 are salary and related expenses for Service Reps in the amount of $100.0 million. Such salary and related expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $91.2 million and $80.7 million, respectively.

     (q) Lease Commitments

     The Company leases office space, vehicles and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases, which expire at various dates through 2013. The Company's operating leases generally have one to six year terms and may have renewal options. The Company records its respective rent expense and amortization of leasehold improvements on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease and the Company does not negotiate rent holidays, rent concessions or leasehold improvements in its office leases.

     The lease period is determined as the original lease term without renewals, unless and until the exercise of lease renewal options is reasonably assured.

     (r) Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

     Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) include costs related to sales and marketing activities, corporate overhead and other business support functions. Included in SG&A during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are salary and related expenses of $226.2 million, $207.9 million and $168.6 million, respectively. These salary and related expenses include the cost of the Company’s respiratory therapists in the amount of $63.0 million, $54.0 million and $45.9 million during the respective periods. The Company’s respiratory therapists generally provide non-reimbursable and discretionary clinical follow-up with the customer and communication, as appropriate, to the prescribing physician with respect to the customer’s plan of care. The Company includes the salaries and related expenses of its respiratory therapist personnel (licensed respiratory therapists or, in some cases, registered nurses) in SG&A because it believes that these personnel enhance the Company’s business relative to its competitors that do not employ respiratory therapists.

     (s) Employee Benefit Plans

     The Company has a defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees subject to specific plan requirements. The Company also sponsors an employee stock purchase plan that enables eligible employees to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at the lower of 85 percent of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on: (i) the last day of the offering period; or (ii) the last day of the prior offering period. Employees may elect to have up to 10% of their base salary withheld on an after-tax basis. Under the employee stock purchase plan, 1.2 million shares have been authorized for issuance. To date, 486,635 shares have been issued under this authorization. During 2007, the Company issued 43,767 shares at an average price of $31.22; during 2006, the Company issued 41,973 shares at an average price of $32.36; and during 2005, the Company issued 51,939 shares at an average price of $33.18 per share. In years prior to 2005, the Company funded its employee stock purchase plan using treasury shares. In 2005, the Company began funding its employee stock purchase plan by issuing new common shares. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of the Company’s stock compensation expense.

     (t) Stock Plans

     The Company has multiple stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 11 below.

     Through December 31, 2005, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), and, accordingly, recognized no compensation expense related to stock options and employee stock purchases. For grants of restricted stock, other than those awarded under long-term incentive agreements, the fair value of the shares at the date of grant was amortized to compensation expense over the award’s vesting period.

F-10


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

The Company has historically reported pro forma results under the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.”

     Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective transition method, fair value accounting and recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R are applied to stock-based awards granted or modified subsequent to the date of adoption and prior periods presented are not restated. In addition, for awards granted prior to the effective date, the unvested portion of the awards are recognized in periods subsequent to the effective adoption date based on the grant date fair value determined for pro forma disclosure purposes under SFAS No. 123.

     SFAS No. 123R requires the disclosure of pro forma information for periods prior to the adoption. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share for 2005 as if the Company had recognized compensation expense for all stock-based payments to employees based on their fair values:

Year Ended
December 31,
2005
(In thousands
except per share
      data)
Net income:  
       As reported $ 213,696
       Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in
              net income, net of related tax effects 1,783
       Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
              determined under fair value method for all awards, net of
              related tax effects (10,282 )
       Pro forma net income   $ 205,197
Earnings per common share:
       Basic—as reported $ 2.16
       Diluted—as reported (1) $ 2.06
       Basic—pro forma $ 2.07
       Diluted—pro forma (1) $ 1.98

     (1) Figures reflect the application of the “if converted” method of accounting for the Company’s outstanding 3.0% convertible debentures in accordance with EITF Issue No. 04-8, effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004.

     Refer to Note 11 – Stock Plans for additional disclosures regarding our stock compensation programs.

     (u) Segment Information

     The Company provides home health care equipment and services through 1,019 operating centers in 47 states. The Company’s operating centers exhibit similar long-term financial performance and have similar economic characteristics, having similar products and services, types of customers and methods used to distribute their products and services. We believe we meet the criteria for aggregating our operating segments into a single reporting segment based on the provisions of SFAS No. 131.

     (v) New Accounting Standards

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer in a business combination, including business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisition), to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values of that date, with limited exceptions. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. The provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) are effective as of the beginning of the 2009 calendar year. The Company is currently evaluating the potential future impact of this standard on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

F-11


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective as of the beginning of the 2008 calendar year. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

     In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which permits an entity to choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value at specified election dates. A company will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings on items for which the fair value option has been elected after adoption. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 are effective as of the beginning of the 2008 calendar year. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

     (w) Contingencies

     The Company is involved in certain claims and legal matters arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company uses Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” as guidance on the application of generally accepted accounting principles related to contingencies. The Company evaluates and records liabilities for contingencies based on known claims and legal actions when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the liability can be reasonably estimated.

     (x) Concentration of Credit Risk

     The Company’s revenues are generated through locations in 47 states. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security in extending credit to its customers; however, the Company routinely obtains assignment of (or is otherwise entitled to receive) benefits receivable under the health insurance programs, plans or policies of customers. Included in the Company’s net revenues is reimbursement from government sources under Medicare, Medicaid and other federally funded programs, which aggregated approximately 64% of net revenues in 2007, and 67% of net revenues in 2006 and 2005, respectively.

     (y) Comprehensive Income

     SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The objective of SFAS No. 130 is to report a measure (comprehensive income (loss)) of all changes in equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events in a period other than transactions with owners.

     The Company’s comprehensive income is the same as reported net income for all periods presented.

     (z) Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

     Beginning with the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, (“FIN 48”) as of January 1, 2007, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized the effect of income tax positions only if such positions were probable of being sustained. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

(2) Short-Term Investments

     At December 31, 2007, the Company held $98.3 million of investment grade auction rate securities. These securities are variable-rate debt instruments with contractual maturities between the years 2020 and 2041 with interest rates that reset every seven or 35 days pursuant to a bidding process as determined by the underlying security indentures. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” the investments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses included in comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders' equity. The book value of available-for-sale investments held at December 31, 2007, approximated fair value. Therefore, the Company had no reported unrealized gains and losses. The Company did not hold any available-for-sale investments at December 31, 2006.

     Of the auction rate securities held as of December 31, 2007, $88.3 million are secured by pools of student loans guaranteed by state-designated guaranty agencies or monoline insurers or reinsured by the United States government. The remaining $10.0 million was comprised of securities backed by pools of municipal bonds. All of the auction rate securities held by the company are senior obligations under the applicable indentures authorizing the issuance of such securities. Recent turmoil in the credit markets has resulted in widespread failures to attract demand for such securities at the periodic auction dates occurring subsequent to December 31, 2007. While all of the auctions involving all of the securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2007, were successful during January 2008, auctions involving $80.0 million of these securities failed to attract sufficient demand in February 2008, resulting in our continuing to hold such securities.

     We will continue to monitor credit market conditions to assess the liquidity of our short-term investments. Due to our ability to access our cash and cash equivalents, amounts available under our revolving credit facility, and our expected operating cash flows, we believe that we have adequate liquidity available to meet our obligations.

F-12


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

(3) Accounts Receivable

     Accounts receivable at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of:

      2007       2006
(In thousands)
Trade Accounts Receivable       $ 241,288        $ 204,892  
Less allowance for sales adjustments and uncollectible accounts (1)   (42,370 )   (34,359 )
$ 198,918   $ 170,533

(1) The Company recorded an allowance for sales adjustments of $10.7 million in 2006 pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (see Note 9).

(4) Property and Equipment, Net

     Property and equipment at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of:

      2007       2006
(In thousands)
Land and improvements      $ 3,111        $ 3,111  
Building and improvements 21,830 21,023
Medical rental equipment 696,824 612,679
Equipment, furniture and other 178,534 156,194
  900,299 793,007
Less accumulated depreciation (560,148 ) (471,682 )
Net property and equipment $ 340,151 $ 321,325  

     Depreciation of medical rental equipment was approximately $82.6 million in 2007, $68.7 million in 2006 and $62.3 million in 2005.

(5) Leases

     The Company entered into a three-year capital lease in 2007 covering computer equipment with an outstanding balance of $0.3 million at December 31, 2007. The Company entered into a two-year capital lease in 2005 covering computer equipment with no outstanding balance at December 31, 2007 and $0.4 million outstanding at December 31, 2006. The book value of the underlying equipment is included in Property and Equipment as follows:

      2007       2006
(In thousands)
Equipment and furniture      $ 1,250        $ 815  
Less accumulated depreciation (614 ) (244 )
$ 636 $ 571

     Amortization of assets held under capital leases of $1.0 million, $1.0 million and $0.9 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, is included with depreciation expense in the accompanying statement of operations.

     The Company has noncancelable lease obligations, primarily for buildings, office equipment and vehicles, that expire over the next six years and may provide for renewal options for periods ranging from one year to five years and that require the Company to pay ancillary costs such as maintenance and insurance. The Company records its respective rent expense and amortization of leasehold improvements on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease and the Company does not negotiate rent holidays, rent concessions or leasehold improvements in its office leases. Operating lease expense was approximately $51.7 million in 2007, $47.7 million in 2006 and $43.2 million in 2005. Future minimum lease payments under capital leases and noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2007, are as follows:

F-13


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Capital Operating
      leases       leases
(In thousands)
2008      $ 144      $ 39,230
2009 150 26,416
2010 13 15,008
2011 5,503
2012 1,502
Thereafter 195
       Total minimum lease payments $ 307 $ 87,854

(6) Long-Term Obligations

     Long-term obligations at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of:

      2007       2006
(In thousands)
Convertible debt to mature in 2037, bearing fixed interest of 2.75%, with a callable option in 2012      $ 275,000      $
Convertible debt to mature in 2037, bearing fixed interest of 2.75%, with a callable option in 2014 275,000
Convertible debt to mature in 2033, bearing fixed interest of 3.0%, with a callable option in 2008 275,000 275,000
Eurodollar loans under five year revolving credit agreement bearing annual interest equal to
       the British Bankers Association LIBOR Rate (“BBA LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin based
       on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio (consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated
       EBITDA) 10,000 60,000
Capital lease obligations due through 2010 307 436
Unsecured, deferred acquisition obligations net of imputed interest, payable in various
       installments through 2008 2,900 10,611
              Total long-term obligations 838,207 346,047
              Less: current installments 288,044 71,047
              Long-term debt, excluding current installments $ 550,163 $ 275,000

     The Company’s current revolving credit agreement with several lenders and Bank of America N.A. as agent, dated December 1, 2006, permits the Company to borrow amounts up to $390.0 million under a five-year revolving credit facility. The five-year revolving credit facility contains a $60.0 million letter of credit sub-facility, which reduces the principal amount available under the five-year revolving credit facility by the amount of outstanding letters of credit on the sub-facility. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, $10.0 million and $60.0 million, respectively, in borrowings were outstanding on the five-year credit facility and $23.5 million and $19.0 million, respectively, in standby letters of credit were issued as of those dates. The revolving five-year credit agreement has a maturity date of December 1, 2011. Upon entering into the five-year credit agreement, origination and other upfront fees and expenses of $1.0 million were paid and are being amortized over five years. In addition to the upfront fees, the Company pays an annual administration agency fee along with a quarterly facility fee. The facility fee is based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and ranges between 0.10% and 0.175% annually. The leverage ratio is calculated each quarter to determine the applicable interest rate on revolving loans, the letter of credit fee and the facility fee for the following quarter. The revolving credit agreement contains several financial and other negative and affirmative covenants customary in such agreements and is secured by a pledge of the stock of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of Lincare Holdings Inc. The financial covenants in the Company’s credit agreement include interest coverage and leverage ratios, as defined in the agreement. The Company’s credit agreement requires compliance with all covenants set forth in the agreement and the Company was in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. The credit agreement defines the occurrence of certain specified events as events of default which, if not waived by or cured to the satisfaction of the requisite lenders, allow the lenders to take actions against the Company, including termination of commitments under the agreement, acceleration of any unpaid principal and accrued interest in respect of outstanding borrowings, payment of additional cash collateral to be held in escrow for the benefit of the lenders and enforcement of any and all rights and interests created and existing under the credit agreement.

F-14


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Under certain conditions, an event of default may result in an increase in the interest rate (the “Default Rate”) payable by the Company on loans outstanding under the credit facility. The Default Rate is equal to the interest rate (including any applicable percentage as set forth in the agreement) otherwise applicable to such loans plus 2% per annum. In the case of a bankruptcy event (as defined in the credit agreement) all commitments automatically terminate and all amounts outstanding under the credit facility become immediately due and payable.

     On October 31, 2007, the Company completed the sale of $275.0 million principal amount (including exercise of a $25.0 million over-allotment option) of convertible senior debentures due 2037 – Series A (the “Series A Debentures”) and $275.0 million principal amount (including exercise of a $25.0 million over-allotment option) of convertible senior debentures due 2037 – Series B (the “Series B Debentures” and together with the Series A Debentures, the “Series Debentures”) in a private placement. The Series Debentures will pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 2.75% per annum. The Series Debentures are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and will be convertible under specified circumstances based upon a base conversion rate, which, under certain circumstances, will be increased pursuant to a formula that is subject to a maximum conversion rate. Upon conversion, holders of the Series Debentures will receive cash up to the principal amount, and any excess conversion value will be delivered in shares of the Company’s common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of common stock, at the Company’s option. The initial base conversion rate for the Debentures is 19.5044 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Series Debentures, equivalent to an initial base conversion price of approximately $51.27 per share. In addition, if at the time of conversion the applicable price of the Company’s common stock exceeds the base conversion price, holders of the Series A Debentures and Series B Debentures will receive an additional number of shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Debentures, as determined pursuant to a specified formula. The Company will have the right to redeem the Series A Debentures and the Series B Debentures at any time after November 1, 2012 and November 1, 2014, respectively. Holders of the Series Debentures will have the right to require the Company to repurchase for cash all or some of their Series Debentures upon the occurrence of certain fundamental change transactions or on November 1, 2012, 2017, 2022, 2027 and 2032 in the case of the Series A Debentures and November 1, 2014, 2017, 2022, 2027 and 2032 in the case of the Series B Debentures.

     On June 11, 2003, the Company completed the sale of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.0% Convertible Senior Debentures due 2033 (the “Debentures”) in a private placement. On June 23, 2003, the Company sold an additional $25.0 million principal amount of Debentures pursuant to the exercise in full of an over-allotment option granted to the initial purchasers of the Debentures. The Debentures are convertible into shares of Lincare common stock based on a conversion rate of 18.7515 shares for each $1,000 principal amount of Debentures. This is equivalent to a total of 5,156,663 shares at a conversion price of approximately $53.33 per share of common stock. The Debentures are convertible into common stock in any calendar quarter if, among other circumstances, the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock for at least 20 trading days during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the previous calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 120% of the applicable conversion price per share ($64.00 per share) of Lincare common stock on such last trading day. Interest on the Debentures is payable at the rate of 3.0% per annum on June 15 and December 15 of each year. The Debentures are senior unsecured obligations and will mature on June 15, 2033. The Debentures are redeemable by the Company on or after June 15, 2008, and may be put to the Company for repurchase on June 15, 2008, 2010, 2013, or 2018. The Debentures are not secured by any assets of the Company or guaranteed by the Company or by those of its subsidiaries. As a result, the Debentures are effectively subordinated to the revolving bank credit facility. Due to the right of the holders of the Debentures to put the securities to us for cash within one year of December 31, 2007 balance sheet date, the Company reclassified the Debentures from a long-term obligation to a current liability on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.

F-15


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     The aggregate maturities of long-term obligations for each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2007 are as follows:

      (In thousands)
2008        $ 288,044
2009 150
2010 13
2011
2012 275,000
Thereafter 275,000
$ 838,207

(7) Income Taxes

     The tax effects of temporary differences that account for significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented below:

      2007       2006
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:    
       Allowance for doubtful accounts      $ 8,678      $ 8,700
       Accruals 8,290 7,014
       Deferred revenue 4,351 3,458
       Stock-based compensation 12,216 7,049
       Other 11,592 6,340
45,127 32,561
              Less: Valuation allowance __ __
              Total deferred tax assets 45,127 32,561
Deferred tax liabilities:
       Tax over book intangible asset amortization (169,195 ) (139,563 )
       Tax over book depreciation (41,151 ) (45,854 )
       Convertible debt interest (21,654 ) (14,736 )
       Other (1,302 ) (13,073 )
              Total deferred tax liabilities (233,302 ) (213,226 )
              Net deferred tax liabilities $ (188,175 ) $ (180,665 )

     There is no valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to allow for the utilization of its deferred tax assets.

F-16


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     Income tax expense attributable to operations consists of:

Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
(In thousands)
Current:      
       Federal      $ 101,570      $ 102,612      $ 104,002
       State 8,441 6,023 9,667
              Total current 110,011 108,635 113,669
Deferred:
       Federal 21,977 14,148 16,060
       State 2,603 4,079 (359 )
              Total deferred 24,580 18,227 15,701
              Total income tax expense $ 134,591 $ 126,862 $ 129,370
Total income tax expense allocation:
       Income from operations $ 134,591 $ 126,862 $ 129,370
       Stockholders’ equity, for compensation expense for tax purposes
       in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes (12,040 ) (557 ) (26,520 )
$ 122,551 $ 126,305 $ 102,850

     Total income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying a U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes as a result of the following:

Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
(In thousands)
Computed “expected” tax expense      $ 126,234        $ 118,945      $ 120,073
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 7,179 6,566 6,050
Other 1,178 1,351 3,247
         Total income tax expense $ 134,591 $ 126,862 $ 129,370

     The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, on January 1, 2007. As a result of adoption, the Company recognized a charge to stockholders’ equity of $0.6 million as a cumulative effect adjustment. As of January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007 respectively, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits including interest and penalties, of $17.9 million and $17.7 million of which $12.2 million and $12.0 million, net of federal tax benefit, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. The gross amount provided for potential interest and penalties at the date of adoption totaled $3.2 million and $1.0 million respectively. The gross amount provided for potential interest and penalties at December 31, 2007 totaled $3.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

F-17


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits excluding the related interest and penalties at December 31, 2007 is a follows:

2007
      (In thousands)
Total gross unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007        $ 13,748  
       Additions for tax positions related to the current year 1,627
       Additions for tax positions related to prior years 577
       Reductions for tax positions related to prior years (2,362 )
       Settlements (464 )
       Reductions due to lapse in statute of limitations (166 )
Total gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007        $ 12,960

     The Company conducts business nationally and, as a result, files U.S. federal income tax returns and returns in various state and local jurisdictions. In the normal course of business the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the United States. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations for years before 2002.

     The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) closed its examination of the Company’s U.S. income tax returns for the years 2001 through 2003 in the third quarter of 2007. The Company subsequently filed additional claims for the years 2002 through 2005. The examination phase of the audit for the year 2005 has concluded with the exception of the additional claim and it is likely that the examination of the year 2006 will conclude in 2008. The Company has been invited to participate in the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Program, or CAP, for the years 2007 and 2008. The objective of CAP is to reduce taxpayer burden and uncertainty, while assuring the IRS of the tax return’s accuracy prior to filing, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for post-filing examination.

     The Company does not expect that the total amount of unrecognized tax positions will significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months.

(8) Other Current Liabilities

     Other current liabilities at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of:

      2007       2006 
 (In thousands)
Deferred revenue    $ 40,917    $ 38,121
Other current liabilities 11,328 2,735
$ 52,245 $ 40,856

(9) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108)

      In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 addresses how the effects of prior-year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 requires an entity to quantify misstatements using a balance sheet and income statement approach (the “dual approach”) and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. SAB 108 is effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006.

     Traditionally, there have been two methods available for quantifying the effects of misstatements in financial statements, the “roll-over” method and the “iron curtain” method. The roll-over method considers the impact of errors or misstatements on the current-year income statement, including the effect of reversing prior-year misstatements, but its use can result in the accumulation of misstatements in the balance sheet. The iron-curtain method, on the other hand, considers the effect of correcting the accumulation of prior and current year misstatements in the period ending balance sheet. Prior to the Company’s adoption of SAB 108, the Company applied the roll-over method in quantifying financial statement misstatements.

F-18


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SAB 108 effective as of January 1, 2006. As permitted by SAB 108, the Company elected to record the effects of applying SAB 108 using the cumulative effect transition method, thereby recording the cumulative effect of initially applying the dual approach as adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities with an offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings. The misstatements that were corrected are described below.

     Certain items provided by the Company are reimbursed under rental arrangements that generally provide for fixed monthly payments for as long as the patient is using the equipment and medical necessity continues (subject to capped rental arrangements which limit the rental payment periods in some instances). Once initial delivery of rental equipment is made to the patient, a monthly billing cycle is established based on the date of delivery. Monthly rental billings are generated in 30-day cycles so that each month’s billing falls on approximately the same day of the month as the initial billing. No separate payment is earned from the initial equipment delivery and setup process. During the rental period, the Company is responsible for servicing the equipment and providing routine maintenance, if necessary. In all accounting periods prior to the application of SAB 108 and in all instances where such rental arrangements occurred in the past, rental revenue was recognized on the cycle billing date for the full month’s billing amount.

     This accounting treatment resulted in an overstatement of revenue at each calendar month-end period. More appropriately, revenues recorded from rental arrangements should have been recognized ratably over the 30-day service period with a portion deferred for the amount of the monthly bill that is unearned at calendar month-end. The Company previously quantified these errors under the roll-over method and concluded that they were immaterial.

     In its application of SAB 108, the Company corrected the errors resulting from its rental revenue recognition policies by deferring the unearned portion of rental revenues and establishing a deferred revenue liability on its balance sheet. The deferral of rental revenues also required an adjustment to deferred income taxes. In electing the cumulative effect transition method in applying SAB 108, the Company recorded cumulative adjustments to the carrying amounts of liabilities for deferred revenue and deferred income taxes by $34.4 million and $13.3 million, respectively, in its 2006 opening balance sheet and an offsetting adjustment to its opening balance of retained earnings in the amount of $21.1 million.

     Pursuant to its application of SAB 108, the Company made additional adjustments to its 2006 opening balance sheet related to the recording of an allowance for sales adjustments against accounts receivable. The Company’s revenues are recorded at net realizable amounts estimated to be paid by customers and third-party payors. The Company’s billing system contains payor-specific price tables that reflect the fee schedule amounts in effect or contractually agreed upon by various government and commercial payors for each item of equipment or supply provided to a customer. Actual adjustments that result from differences between the payment amount received and the expected realizable amount are typically identified and ultimately recorded at the point of cash application or when otherwise determined pursuant to the Company’s collection procedures. The Company reports revenues in its financial statements net of such adjustments.

     Due to the nature of the industry and the reimbursement environment in which the Company operates, certain estimates are required to record net revenues and accounts receivable at their net realizable values at the time products are provided. Inherent in these estimates is the risk that they will have to be revised or updated as additional information becomes available. Specifically, the complexity of many third-party billing arrangements and the uncertainty of reimbursement amounts from certain payors may result in adjustments to amounts originally recorded.

     The Company had historically reported revenues in its financial statements prior to the application of SAB 108 net of such sales adjustments at the time they were identified but did not report accounts receivable net of a specific allowance for estimates of such sales adjustments. The Company does, however, report accounts receivable net of allowances for uncollectible accounts (i.e., bad debt). Bad debt is recorded as an operating expense and consists of billed charges that are ultimately deemed uncollectible due to the customer’s or third-party payor’s inability or refusal to pay.

     In all accounting periods prior to the application of SAB 108 and in all instances where such sales adjustments were recorded in the past, the Company consistently applied this accounting treatment which resulted in the recording of sales adjustments related to prior period revenues against current period revenues that either overstated or understated net revenues within each financial statement period. More appropriately, an estimate of sales adjustments arising from differences between the payment amounts received and the expected realizable amounts should have been recorded at the time that revenues were recognized and an allowance recorded against accounts receivable for estimates of such sales adjustments. The Company previously quantified these errors under the roll-over method and concluded that they were immaterial.

F-19


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     In its application of SAB 108, the Company corrected the errors by establishing an allowance against accounts receivable for sales adjustments on its balance sheet. The recognition of such allowances also required an adjustment to deferred income taxes. In electing the cumulative effect transition method in applying SAB 108, the Company recorded cumulative adjustments to the carrying amounts of the allowance for doubtful accounts and deferred income taxes by $10.7 million and $4.2 million, respectively, in its 2006 opening balance sheet and an offsetting adjustment to its opening balance of retained earnings in the amount of $6.5 million.

     The cumulative effect of correcting the financial statement misstatements in accordance with SAB 108 was an increase in deferred revenue and the allowance for doubtful accounts of $34.4 million and $10.7 million, respectively, and reduced retained earnings of $27.6 million. Deferred income tax adjustments totaling $17.5 million were also recorded as part of the cumulative adjustment.

(10) Stockholders’ Equity

     During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SAB 108 (see Note 9) effective as of January 1, 2006. The related impact to stockholders’ equity was a $27.6 million reduction to retained earnings in the 2006 opening balance sheet.

     The Company has 5,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, all of which are unissued. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to such number of shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof without any further vote or action by the stockholders but subject to restrictions imposed by the Company’s revolving credit agreement.

(11) Stock Plans

     The Company issues stock options and other stock-based awards to key employees and directors under stock-based compensation plans. The Company also sponsors an employee stock purchase plan.

     Through December 31, 2005, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), and, accordingly, recognized no compensation expense related to stock options and employee stock purchases. For grants of restricted stock, other than those awarded under long-term incentive agreements, the fair value of the shares at the date of grant was amortized to compensation expense over the award’s vesting period. The Company had historically reported pro forma results under the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.”

     Adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R)

     Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective transition method, fair value accounting and recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R are applied to stock-based awards granted or modified subsequent to the date of adoption and prior periods presented are not restated. In addition, for awards granted prior to the effective date, the unvested portion of the awards are recognized in periods subsequent to the effective adoption date based on the grant date fair value determined for pro forma disclosure purposes under SFAS No. 123.

     Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the statements of cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits to be classified as a part of cash flows from financing activities. Excess tax benefits are realized tax benefits from tax deductions for exercised options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock compensation costs for such options. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R, $5.0 million and $1.1 million of excess tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, have been classified as a financing cash inflow as well as an operating cash outflow. Additionally, $12.4 million and $3.5 million have been included in the change in income taxes payable as an operating cash inflow for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company recognized total stock-based compensation costs of $18.0 million, $20.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, as well as related tax benefits of $6.4 million, $6.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. All stock-based compensation costs are expensed using a graded method approach and are either classified within operating or selling, general and administrative expenses on the attached consolidated statements of operations. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R effective January 1, 2006, the Company recognized compensation costs of $15.5 million and $17.4 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively, in excess of amounts that would have been recognized if the Company had continued to account for the stock-based compensation programs under APB 25.

F-20


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Stock Options

     The Company has six outstanding stock option plans that provide for the grant of options and other stock-based awards to officers, employees and directors. To date, stock options have been granted with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the stock at the date of grant. Stock options generally have eight to ten year expiration terms and generally vest over one to five years depending on the particular grant. As of December 31, 2007, approximately 3.5 million shares are available for future grant under the Company’s shareholder-approved stock plans. See table below for summary of individual plans.

Plan Year
      1996       1998       2000       2001       2004       2007       Total
Reserved   4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 6,500,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 23,500,000
Outstanding 20,000 676,500 118,000 4,258,450 2,594,666 1,288,000 8,955,616
Available
     for grant 500 104,800 634,706 2,712,000   3,452,006

     The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding under the plans at December 31, 2007:

Stock Options Outstanding Stock Options Exercisable
Weighted
Average Weighted Weighted
Remaining Average Average
Contractual Exercise Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices         Number       Life       Price       Number       Price
     $12.25–$24.45 936,000   1.48 years         $ 19.18   936,000       $       19.18
     $24.50–$32.00   3,890,966 2.70 years 29.40 3,890,966 29.40
     $32.00–$42.33 4,128,650 6.36 years 40.52 699,141   40.80
     $ 12.25–$42.33 8,955,616 4.26 years $ 33.46 5,526,107   $ 29.11

     The Company believes that the Black-Scholes valuation model provides a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the Company’s stock options, particularly in view of the absence of any market-based or performance-based vesting conditions attached to those stock options. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires, among other things, an estimate of expected share price volatility. The Company considers the use of both historical and implied volatility assumptions in calculating the fair value of stock options issued. Prior to 2005, the Company used only historical volatility in calculating the fair value of its stock options. In estimating the fair value of stock options granted during 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company used implied volatility derived from its publicly-traded options as the volatility input in the option valuation model. In using implied volatility, the Company considered SFAS No. 123R and the guidance provided in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “Share-Based Payment,” and determined that implied volatility provides the most reliable estimate of expected volatility. The expected option term is based on historical exercise and post-vesting termination patterns. The expected dividend yield is 0% as the Company has not paid any cash dividends on its capital stock and does not anticipate it will pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of the grant.

F-21


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     Following are the specific weighted average valuation assumptions for the stock options, where applicable, used for each respective period:

Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
Expected dividend yield 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
Risk-free interest rate 4.69 % 5.03 % 4.15 %
Expected volatility 23.28 % 26.21 % 24.40 %
Expected term   5 years   5 years   5 years

     During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company granted 1,288,000 stock options.

     Stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2005 through 2007 is summarized below:

Weighted Weighted Average
Average Remaining
Number of Exercise Contractual Life Aggregate
      Options       Price       (Years)       Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2004            10,048,100            $ 23.32   4.59     $ 194,199,486
Exercised in 2005 (2,740,565 ) 17.65
Cancelled in 2005 (36,950 ) 32.82
Options granted in 2005 2,176,100 42.33
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 9,446,685 29.32 4.89 $ 119,939,146
Exercised in 2006 (521,925 ) 22.31
Cancelled in 2006 (142,250 ) 39.02
Options granted in 2006 874,400 38.51
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 9,656,910 30.38 4.26 $ 96,515,984
Exercised in 2007 (1,886,688 ) 21.09
Cancelled in 2007 (102,606 ) 40.74
Options granted in 2007 1,288,000 39.03
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 8,955,616 $ 33.46 4.26 $ 37,355,609
Exercisable at December 31, 2007 5,526,107 $ 29.11 2.90 $ 37,355,609
Vested or expected to vest as of December 31, 2007 8,713,854 $ 33.24 4.21 $ 37,355,609

     Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007, were 8,955,616. Of those stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007, 5,526,107 are exercisable at December 31, 2007 and 3,429,509 are unvested. Of the total stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007, 8,713,854 stock options are vested or expected to vest in the future, net of expected cancellations and forfeitures of 241,762. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, amounted to $33.0 million, $8.6 million and $68.7 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock

     Under the 2004 Stock Plan, certain key employees may be granted restricted stock at nominal cost to them. Restricted stock is measured at fair value on the date of the grant, based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock. Restricted stock vests upon the employees’ fulfillment of specified performance and/or service-based conditions. On May 17, 2007 and October 1, 2007, the Company granted 383,500 and 5,800 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to certain employees. On December 14, 2006, the Company granted 8,000 shares of restricted stock to certain employees. The restrictions lapse in three equal annual installments. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, unearned compensation for grants of restricted stock equivalent to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant was recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and subsequently amortized to compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards. All unamortized unearned compensation at January 1, 2006 was reclassified to additional paid-in capital. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company recognized $2.6 million, $2.9 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock.

F-22


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     A summary of the status of unvested restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2005 through 2007 is presented below:

Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
      Shares       Per Share
Unvested at January 1, 2005   260,000       $ 31.72  
Granted 0  
Vested (86,667 ) 31.72
Forfeited 0
Unvested at December 31, 2005 173,333 31.72
Granted 8,000 39.30
Vested (86,667 ) 31.72
Forfeited 0
Unvested at December 31, 2006 94,666 32.36
Granted 389,300 38.99
Vested (89,333 ) 31.95
Forfeited (22,783 ) 39.09
Unvested at December 31, 2007 371,850 $   38.99

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

     The Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Stock Purchase Plan”) provides a means to encourage and assist employees in acquiring a stock ownership interest in Lincare. Payroll deductions are accumulated during each quarter and applied toward the purchase of stock on the last trading day of each quarter. The Stock Purchase Plan defines purchase price per share as 85% of the lower of the fair value of a share of common stock on the last trading day of the previous plan quarter, or the last trading day of the current plan quarter.

     During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, 43,767 shares, 41,973 shares and 51,939 shares, respectively, of common stock were purchased under the Stock Purchase Plan resulting in compensation cost of $0.3 million and $0.3 million and $0.0 million, respectively.

F-23


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Total Stock-Based Compensation

     SFAS No. 123R requires the disclosure of pro forma information for periods prior to the adoption. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share for 2005 as if the Company had recognized compensation expense for all stock-based payments to employees based on their fair values:

Year Ended
December 31,
2005
(In thousands, except
      per share data)
Net income:   
     As reported   $ 213,696  
     Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in net
          income, net of related tax effects 1,783
     Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
          determined under fair value method for all awards, net of
          related tax effects (10,282 )
     Pro forma net income $ 205,197
Earnings per common share:
     Basic—as reported $ 2.16
     Diluted—as reported (1) $ 2.06
     Basic—pro forma $ 2.07
     Diluted—pro forma (1) $ 1.98

(1)      

Figures reflect the application of the “if converted” method of accounting for the Company’s outstanding 3.0% convertible debentures in accordance with EITF Issue No. 04-8, effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004.

     The following weighted-average per share fair values were determined for stock-based compensation grants or employee stock purchases occurring during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:

Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
Options granted     $ 12.23     $ 11.94     $ 12.46
Restricted stock and stock awards granted $ 38.99 $ 39.30 n/a
Employee stock purchases $ 7.38 $ 7.80 $ 8.69

     During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company received cash of $41.1 million, $13.2 million and $50.4 million, respectively, from employee stock purchases and exercises of stock options, and recognized related tax benefits of $12.1 million, $3.2 and $25.1 million, respectively. There were no stock options settled for cash during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

      As of December 31, 2007, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and restricted stock amounted to $22.1 million and $13.2 million, respectively, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service periods of 2 years and 3 years, respectively.

     The total estimated fair value of stock options vested during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $11.0 million, $12.3 million and $20.5 million, respectively. The total estimated fair value of restricted stock vested during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $2.9 million, $2.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively.

     The Company issues new shares of common stock to satisfy stock-based awards upon exercise.

(12) Net Revenues

     Included in the Company’s net revenues is reimbursement from the federal government under Medicare, Medicaid and other federally funded programs, which aggregated approximately 64% of net revenues in 2007, and 67% of net revenues in 2006 and 2005, respectively.

F-24


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s net revenues by product category:

Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
(In thousands)
Oxygen and other respiratory therapy       $ 1,470,363       $ 1,295,983       $ 1,154,268
Home medical equipment and other 125,627 113,812 112,359
     Total $ 1,595,990 $ 1,409,795 $ 1,266,627

     Included in net revenues are rental and sale items that comprise approximately 66.7% and 33.3% of total revenues in 2007, approximately 69.6% and 30.4% in 2006, and approximately 71.4% and 28.6% in 2005, respectively.

(13) Income Per Common Share

     Basic income per common share is computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income per common share reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in earnings, including stock options and outstanding 3% convertible debt. When the exercise of stock options is anti-dilutive, they are excluded from the calculation. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the number of excluded shares underlying anti-dilutive stock options was 577,556. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the number of excluded shares underlying anti-dilutive stock options was 35,020. There were no anti-dilutive stock options excluded from the calculation for the year ended December 31, 2005.

     In October 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) ratified the consensus on EITF Issue 04-8, “The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share,” that the impact of contingently convertible debt should be included in diluted earnings per share computations regardless of whether the market price conversion condition has been met. This provision is effective for all reporting periods presented.

     A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted income per common share computations is as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
      2007       2006       2005
(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
 Basic — Income available to common stockholders       $ 226,077       $ 212,981       $ 213,696
 Adjustment for assumed dilution:
     Interest on 3% convertible debt, net of tax 5,172 5,170 5,139
 Diluted — Income available to common stockholders and holders of dilutive securities $ 231,249 $ 218,151 $ 218,835
Denominator:
 Weighted average shares 83,387 94,209 98,913
 Effect of dilutive securities:
     Stock options 1,144 1,740 2,236
     3% convertible debt 5,157 5,157 5,157
 Adjusted weighted average shares 89,688 101,106 106,306
Per share amount:
 Basic $ 2.71 $ 2.26 $ 2.16
 Diluted $ 2.58 $ 2.16 $ 2.06

(14) Business Combinations

     The Company’s strategy is to increase its market share through internal growth and strategic acquisitions. Lincare achieves internal growth in existing geographic markets through the addition of new customers through referral sources to its network of local operating centers. In addition, the Company expands into new geographic markets on a selective basis, either through acquisitions or by opening new operating centers, when it believes such expansion will enhance its business.

F-25


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     The Company acquired certain assets of three businesses in 2007, 10 businesses in 2006 and 15 businesses in 2005. Consideration for the acquisitions generally included cash, deferred acquisition payments (unsecured non-interest bearing) and the assumption of certain liabilities.

     Each acquisition during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was accounted for as a purchase. The results of operations of the acquired companies are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations since the respective dates of acquisition. Each of the acquired companies conducted operations similar to that of the Company. These allocations are inclusive of amounts not yet paid.

     The total aggregate cost of the acquisitions described above was as follows:

2007       2006       2005
      (In thousands)
Cash       $ 4,775     $ 60,068     $ 93,326
Deferred acquisition obligations 1,210 12,310 27,994
Assumption of liabilities 23 164 479
$ 6,008 $ 72,542 $ 121,799

     The total aggregate purchase price of the acquisitions described above was allocated as follows:

2007 2006 2005
(In thousands)
Current assets           $ 258           $ 8,726           $ 4,263
Property and equipment 83 5,631 3,329
Intangible assets 40 190 225
Goodwill 5,627 57,995 113,982
  $ 6,008   $ 72,542   $ 121,799

     The following unaudited pro forma supplemental information on the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 includes the 2007 acquisitions as if they had been combined at the beginning of 2006.

2007 2006
(In thousands, except
per share data)
Net revenues           $  1,599,860           $ 1,414,052
Net income $ 226,824 $ 213,794
Basic — income per common share $ 2.72 $ 2.27
Diluted — income per common share $ 2.59 $ 2.17

     This unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of either the results of operations that would have occurred had the transactions been effected at the beginning of 2006 or of future results of operations of the combined companies.

(15) Contingencies

     As a health care provider, the Company is subject to extensive government regulation, including numerous laws directed at preventing fraud and abuse and laws regulating reimbursement under various government programs. The marketing, billing, documenting and other practices of health care companies are all subject to government scrutiny. To ensure compliance with Medicare and other regulations, regional carriers often conduct audits and request patient records and other documents to support claims submitted by Lincare for payment of services rendered to customers. Similarly, government agencies periodically open investigations and obtain information from health care providers pursuant to legal process.

     Violations of federal and state regulations can result in severe criminal, civil and administrative penalties and sanctions, including disqualification from Medicare and other reimbursement programs.

F-26


LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

     From time to time, the Company receives inquiries from various government agencies requesting customer records and other documents. It has been the Company’s policy to cooperate with all such requests for information. There are several pending government inquiries, but the government has not instituted any proceedings or served the Company with any complaints as a result of these inquiries. However, the Company can give no assurances as to the duration or outcome of these inquiries.

     Private litigants may also make claims against health care providers for violations of health care laws in actions known as qui tam suits. In these cases, the government has the opportunity to intervene in, and take control of, the litigation. The Company is a defendant in certain qui tam proceedings. The government has declined to intervene in all unsealed qui tam actions of which the Company is aware and it is vigorously defending these suits.

     The Company is also involved in certain other claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of its business. The ultimate disposition of all such matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

(16) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited — see accompanying accountants’ report)

     The following is a summary of quarterly financial results for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:

First Second Third Fourth
      Quarter       Quarter       Quarter       Quarter
(In thousands, except per share data)
2007:
     Net revenues       $ 378,459       $ 397,083       $ 408,152       $ 412,296
     Operating income $ 90,429 $ 94,104 $ 99,089 $ 99,526
     Net income $ 53,895 $ 55,955 $ 58,639 $ 57,588
     Income per common share:
     Basic $ 0.62 $ 0.66 $ 0.69 $ 0.73
     Diluted $ 0.59 $ 0.63 $ 0.66 $ 0.70
2006:
     Net revenues $ 333,591 $ 350,127 $ 358,013 $ 368,064
     Operating income $ 79,672 $ 86,565 $ 89,138 $ 91,684
     Net income $ 47,886 $ 51,905 $ 56,222 $ 56,968
     Income per common share:
     Basic $ 0.50 $ 0.55 $ 0.60 $ 0.62
     Diluted $ 0.48 $ 0.52 $ 0.57 $ 0.59

F-27


SCHEDULE II

LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Balance at   Net Sales Balance at
Beginning Charged to Adjustments End of
Description       of Period       Expenses       and Other       Deductions       Period
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2007
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for sales adjustments and
uncollectible accounts      $34,359      $23,940      $6,264 (1)        $22,193 (2)        $42,370
Year Ended December 31, 2006
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for sales adjustments and
uncollectible accounts   $15,678     $21,147     $11,636 (1)(3)   $14,102 (2)   $34,359
Year Ended December 31, 2005
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for uncollectible accounts   $15,468   $18,999   ($268) (1)   $18,521 (2)   $15,678

(1) To record net sales adjustments and allowance on business combinations.

(2) To record write-offs, net of recoveries.

(3) Includes SAB 108 adjustment to beginning balance of $10.7 million (see Note 9 within the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

S-1


INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number Exhibit
3.10(C)      Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Lincare Holdings Inc.
3.11(C)   Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of Lincare Holdings Inc.
3.20(T) Amended and Restated By-Laws of Lincare Holdings Inc.
4.1(I) Lincare Holdings Inc. Indenture dated as of June 11, 2003
4.2(I) Lincare Holdings Inc. Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 11, 2003
10.20(A) Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of Registrant
10.21(A) Lincare Holdings Inc. 1991 Stock Plan
10.22(E) Lincare Holdings Inc. 1994 Stock Plan
10.23(E) Lincare Holdings Inc. 1996 Stock Plan
10.24(E) Lincare Holdings Inc. 1998 Stock Plan
10.25(E) Lincare Holdings Inc. 2000 Stock Plan
10.27(J) Amended Lincare Holdings Inc. 2001 Stock Plan
10.28(K) Lincare Holdings Inc. 2004 Stock Plan
10.29(R) Lincare Holdings Inc. 2007 Stock Plan
10.30(G) Lincare Inc. 401(k) Plan
10.31(B) Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.34(L) Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Lincare Holdings Inc. and John P. Byrnes
10.35(L) Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Lincare Holdings Inc. and Paul G. Gabos
10.36(L) Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Lincare Holdings Inc. and Shawn S. Schabel
10.37(L) Restricted Stock Agreement between Lincare Holdings Inc. and John P. Byrnes
10.38(L) Restricted Stock Agreement between Lincare Holdings Inc. and Paul G. Gabos
10.39(L) Restricted Stock Agreement between Lincare Holdings Inc. and Shawn S. Schabel
10.40(F) Form of Executive Employment Agreement dated December 15, 2001
10.41(M) Executive Employment Agreements dated November 15, 2004
10.50(B) Form of Non-employment Director Stock Option Agreement
10.51(B) Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement
10.60(G) Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 25, 2002
10.63(J) First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 4, 2003
10.64(N) Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 10, 2004
10.65(O) Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 26, 2005
10.66(P) Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 28, 2005
10.67 First Supplemental Indenture between Lincare Holdings and U.S. Bank Trust National Association dated December 17, 2004
10.68(Q) Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A. as Agent and Calyon, New York Branch as Syndication Agent dated December 1, 2006
10.70(D) Senior Secured Note Purchase Agreement among Lincare Holdings Inc., as Borrower, and several note holders with Bank of America, N.A., as Agent
10.71(D) Form of Series A Note
10.72(D) Form of Series B Note
10.73(D) Form of Series C Note
10.75(S) First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated October 31, 2007.
10.76(S) Registration Rights Agreement dated October 31, 2007.
10.77(S) Indenture Between Lincare Holdings Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association dated October 31, 2007
10.78(S) Indenture Between Lincare Holdings Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association dated October 31, 2007.
10.79(U) Second Amended Executive Employment Agreements dated December 28, 2007.
12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21.1 List of Subsidiaries of Lincare Holdings Inc.
23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP
24.1          Special Powers of Attorney
31.1   Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer
31.2   Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer
32.1   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer
32.2   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer

S-2



A       Incorporated by reference to the Corresponding exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33- 44672).
B Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K dated March 26, 1998.
C Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 12, 1998.
D Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated November 13, 2000.
E Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K dated March 29, 2001.
F Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K dated March 28, 2002.
G Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated May 13, 2002.
H Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 13, 2002.
I Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 12, 2003.
J Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 14, 2003.
K Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form DEF 14-A dated April 22, 2004.
L Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated November 9, 2004.
M Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated November 18, 2004.
N Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated December 16, 2004.
O Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated April 26, 2005.
P Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 28, 2005.
Q Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated December 4, 2006.
R Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form DEF 14-A dated April 5, 2007.
S Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated November 6, 2007.
T Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 8-K dated November 26, 2007.
U Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated January 3, 2008.

S-3


EX-12.1 2 exhibit_12-1.htm COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Exhibit 12.1

Lincare Holdings Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In thousands, except ratios)

  FOR THE YEAR ENDED
  DECEMBER 31,
  2007      2006      2005      2004      2003
EARNINGS AVAILABLE TO COVER          
FIXED CHARGES:          
Income (loss) from continuing      
     operations before income taxes           
     and minority interests $ 360,668 $ 339,843 $ 343,066 $ 440,403 $ 371,264
Add:          
     Fixed charges deducted from          
     earnings (see below)   47,234   29,007   29,721   32,914   32,204
  
Earnings available to cover          
     fixed charges $ 407,902 $ 368,850 $ 372,787 $ 473,317 $ 403,468
  
FIXED CHARGES:          
Interest expense, including      
     amounts in operating expense  $ 20,837 $ 8,982 $ 11,694 $ 16,270 $ 16,649
Amortized indebtedness 5,706 953 738 785 782
Interest within rent expense   20,691   19,072   17,289   15,859   14,773
                     
Fixed charges  $ 47,234 $ 29,007 $ 29,721 $ 32,914 $ 32,204
  
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO          
FIXED CHARGES      8.64     12.72     12.54     14.38     12.53 


EX-21.1 3 exhibit_21-1.htm LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF LINCARE HOLDINGS INC.

EXHIBIT 21.1

LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES AND
PARTNERSHIPS

DELAWARE CORPORATIONS:

     1) Alpha Respiratory Inc.

     2) Gamma Acquisition Inc.

     3) Health Care Solutions at Home Inc.

     4) Home-Care Equipment Network Inc.

     5) Lincare Holdings Inc.

     6) Lincare Inc.

     7) Lincare Licensing Inc.

     8) Lincare Pharmacy Services Inc.

     9) Lincare Procurement Inc.

     10) Med 4 Home Inc.

     11) HCS Lancaster LLC

INDIANA CORPORATION:

     1) ConvaCare Services Inc.

MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY:

     1) Healthlink Medical Equipment LLC

NEW YORK CORPORATION:

     1) Lincare of New York Inc.


EX-23.1 4 exhibit_23-1.htm CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Lincare Holdings Inc.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-148907 and 333-108207) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-145557, 333-116599, 333-98903, 333-74672, 333-78719, 333-71159, 333-46969, 333-39689 and 333-13275) of Lincare Holdings Inc. of our reports dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Lincare Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form  10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc.

     As discussed in Notes 1(t) and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, and as discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of quantifying errors in 2006.

     As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
 

/s/ KPMG LLP
 

Tampa, Florida
February 27, 2008
Certified Public Accountants


EX-24.1 5 exhibit_24-1.htm SPECIAL POWERS OF ATTORNEY

EXHIBIT 24.1

SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, CHESTER B. BLACK, a legal resident of the State of Massachusetts, desiring to execute a SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY, have made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint JOHN P. BYRNES and PAUL G. GABOS, or either of them, with full power of substitution, my Attorney-In-Fact for me and in my name, place and stead to do and perform the following acts, deeds, matters and things as he deems advisable in the judgment of my said Attorney-In-Fact as fully and effectually to all intents and purposes as I could do if personally present and acting:

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

     To execute and deliver all documents and to carry out with full power and authority every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done by or on behalf of the undersigned, including the execution of the Lincare Holdings Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

     All business transacted hereunder for me shall be transacted in my name, and all endorsements and instruments executed by my Attorney-In-Fact for the purpose of carrying out any of the foregoing powers, shall contain my name, followed by that of my Attorney-In-Fact and the designation "Attorney-In-Fact."

     I hereby ratify and confirm all lawful acts done by my said Attorney-In-Fact pursuant to this Special Power of Attorney, and I direct that this Special Power of Attorney shall continue in effect until terminated by me in writing or by operation of law.

     If the authority contained herein shall be revoked or terminated by operation of law without notice, I hereby agree for myself, executors, administrators, heirs and assigns, in consideration of my Attorney-In-Fact's willingness to act pursuant to this Special Power of Attorney, to save and hold my Attorney-In-Fact harmless from any loss suffered or any liability incurred by him in so acting after such revocation or termination without notice.

/s/ CHESTER B. BLACK
CHESTER B. BLACK


SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, FRANK D. BYRNE, M.D., a legal resident of the State of Indiana, desiring to execute a SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY, have made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint JOHN P. BYRNES and PAUL G. GABOS, or either of them, with full power of substitution, my Attorney-In-Fact for me and in my name, place and stead to do and perform the following acts, deeds, matters and things as he deems advisable in the judgment of my said Attorney-In-Fact as fully and effectually to all intents and purposes as I could do if personally present and acting:

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

     To execute and deliver all documents and to carry out with full power and authority every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done by or on behalf of the undersigned, including the execution of the Lincare Holdings Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

     All business transacted hereunder for me shall be transacted in my name, and all endorsements and instruments executed by my Attorney-In-Fact for the purpose of carrying out any of the foregoing powers, shall contain my name, followed by that of my Attorney-In-Fact and the designation "Attorney-In-Fact."

     I hereby ratify and confirm all lawful acts done by my said Attorney-In-Fact pursuant to this Special Power of Attorney, and I direct that this Special Power of Attorney shall continue in effect until terminated by me in writing or by operation of law.

     If the authority contained herein shall be revoked or terminated by operation of law without notice, I hereby agree for myself, executors, administrators, heirs and assigns, in consideration of my Attorney-In-Fact's willingness to act pursuant to this Special Power of Attorney, to save and hold my Attorney-In-Fact harmless from any loss suffered or any liability incurred by him in so acting after such revocation or termination without notice.

/s/ FRANK D. BYRNE, M.D.
FRANK D. BYRNE, M.D. 


SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, WILLIAM F. MILLER, III, a legal resident of the State of Texas, desiring to execute a SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY, have made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint JOHN P. BYRNES and PAUL G. GABOS, or either of them, with full power of substitution, my Attorney-In-Fact for me and in my name, place and stead to do and perform the following acts, deeds, matters and things as he deems advisable in the judgment of my said Attorney-In-Fact as fully and effectually to all intents and purposes as I could do if personally present and acting:

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

     To execute and deliver all documents and to carry out with full power and authority every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done by or on behalf of the undersigned, including the execution of the Lincare Holdings Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

     All business transacted hereunder for me shall be transacted in my name, and all endorsements and instruments executed by my Attorney-In-Fact for the purpose of carrying out any of the foregoing powers, shall contain my name, followed by that of my Attorney-In-Fact and the designation "Attorney-In-Fact."

     I hereby ratify and confirm all lawful acts done by my said Attorney-In-Fact pursuant to this Special Power of Attorney, and I direct that this Special Power of Attorney shall continue in effect until terminated by me in writing or by operation of law.

     If the authority contained herein shall be revoked or terminated by operation of law without notice, I hereby agree for myself, executors, administrators, heirs and assigns, in consideration of my Attorney-In-Fact's willingness to act pursuant to this Special Power of Attorney, to save and hold my Attorney-In-Fact harmless from any loss suffered or any liability incurred by him in so acting after such revocation or termination without notice.

/s/ WILLIAM F. MILLER, III
WILLIAM F. MILLER, III


SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, STUART H. ALTMAN, a legal resident of the State of Massachusetts, desiring to execute a SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY, have made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint JOHN P. BYRNES and PAUL G. GABOS, or either of them, with full power of substitution, my Attorney-In-Fact for me and in my name, place and stead to do and perform the following acts, deeds, matters and things as he deems advisable in the judgment of my said Attorney-In-Fact as fully and effectually to all intents and purposes as I could do if personally present and acting:

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

     To execute and deliver all documents and to carry out with full power and authority every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done by or on behalf of the undersigned, including the execution of the Lincare Holdings Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

     All business transacted hereunder for me shall be transacted in my name, and all endorsements and instruments executed by my Attorney-In-Fact for the purpose of carrying out any of the foregoing powers, shall contain my name, followed by that of my Attorney-In-Fact and the designation "Attorney-In-Fact."

     I hereby ratify and confirm all lawful acts done by my said Attorney-In-Fact pursuant to this Special Power of Attorney, and I direct that this Special Power of Attorney shall continue in effect until terminated by me in writing or by operation of law.

     If the authority contained herein shall be revoked or terminated by operation of law without notice, I hereby agree for myself, executors, administrators, heirs and assigns, in consideration of my Attorney-In-Fact's willingness to act pursuant to this Special Power of Attorney, to save and hold my Attorney-In-Fact harmless from any loss suffered or any liability incurred by him in so acting after such revocation or termination without notice.

/s/ STUART H. ALTMAN 
STUART H. ALTMAN 


EX-31.1 6 exhibit_31-1.htm CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/RULE 15D-14(A)

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John P. Byrnes, certify that:

     1.     

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc.;

 
2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
  a)     

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
  b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 
  c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
  d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent financial quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 
5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
  a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
  b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
Date: February 27, 2008  By:  /s/ JOHN P. BYRNES
    John P. Byrnes
Chief Executive Officer


EX-31.2 7 exhibit_31-2.htm CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/RULE 15D-14(A)

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul G. Gabos, certify that:

     1.     

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc.;

 
2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
  a)     

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
  b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 
  c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
  d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent financial quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 
5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
  a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
  b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
Date: February 27, 2008  By:  /s/ PAUL G. GABOS
    Paul G. Gabos
Chief Financial Officer


EX-32.1 8 exhibit_32-1.htm CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 scratch.pdf -- Converted by SECPublisher 4.0, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)     

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
  By:  /s/ JOHN P. BYRNES
  John P. Byrnes
Chief Executive Officer

February 27, 2008


EX-32.2 9 exhibit_32-2.htm CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     

information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
  By:  /s/ PAUL G. GABOS
  Paul G. Gabos
Chief Financial Officer
   

February 27, 2008


-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----