Form 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________
FORM 10-K
(Mark One) |
[X] |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______ |
Commission file number 1-10746
JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
06-0935166
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
1411 Broadway
New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices) |
10018
(Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212)
642-3860
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, $0.01 par value |
Name of each exchange
on which registered
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section
15(d) of the Act. [ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes
[ ] No
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[X]
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large
accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [X] |
Accelerated filer [ ] |
Non-accelerated filer [ ] |
Smaller reporting company [ ] |
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). [ ] Yes [X] No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant's most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing price of the
registrant's common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite
tape on July 5, 2008, was approximately $1,091,099,302.
As of February 13,
2009, 85,403,067 shares of the registrant's common stock were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The documents incorporated by reference into this Form
10-K and the Parts hereof into which such documents are incorporated are listed
below:
Document
|
Part
|
Those portions of the registrant's proxy
statement for the registrant's 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
"Proxy Statement") that are specifically identified herein as
incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. |
III |
|
- 2 -
DEFINITIONS
As used in this Report, unless the
context requires otherwise, "our," "us" and "we" means Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
and consolidated subsidiaries, "Jones USA" means Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc.,
"Nine West Group" means Nine West Group Inc., "Nine West" means Nine West
Footwear Corporation, "Victoria" means Victoria + Co Ltd., "McNaughton" means
McNaughton Apparel Group, Inc., "Kasper" means Kasper, Ltd., "Maxwell" means
Maxwell Shoe Company Inc., "Barneys" means Barneys New York, Inc., "Sun" means
Sun Apparel, Inc., "GRI" means GRI Group Limited, "Polo" means Polo Ralph Lauren
Corporation, "FASB" means the Financial Accounting Standards Board, "SFAS" means
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards and "SEC" means the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING DISCLOSURE
This Report includes, and
incorporates by reference, "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements regarding
our expected financial position, business and financing plans are
forward-looking statements. The words "believes," "expect," "plans," "intends,"
"anticipates" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements also include representations of our expectations or
beliefs concerning future events that involve risks and uncertainties,
including:
- those associated with the effect of national, regional and international
economic conditions;
- lowered levels of consumer spending resulting from a general economic
downturn or lower levels of consumer confidence;
- the tightening of the credit markets and our ability to obtain credit on
satisfactory terms;
- given the uncertain economic environment, the possible unwillingness of
committed lenders to meet their obligations to lend to borrowers, in
general;
- the performance of our products within the prevailing retail
environment;
- customer acceptance of both new designs and newly-introduced product
lines;
- our reliance on a few department store groups for large portions of our
business;
- consolidation of our retail customers;
- financial difficulties encountered by our customers;
- the effects of vigorous competition in the markets in which we operate;
- our ability to attract and retain qualified executives and other key
personnel;
- our reliance on independent foreign manufacturers;
- changes in the costs of raw materials, labor, advertising and
transportation;
- the general inability to obtain higher wholesale prices for our products
that we have experienced for many years;
- the uncertainties of sourcing associated with an environment in which
general quota has expired on apparel products but litigation and political
activity seeking to re-impose quotas have been initiated;
- our ability to successfully implement new operational and financial
computer systems; and
- our ability to secure and protect trademarks and other intellectual
property rights.
All statements other than
statements of historical facts included in this Report, including, without
limitation, the statements under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations," are forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, such expectations may prove to be incorrect.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our
expectations ("Cautionary Statements") are disclosed in this Report in
conjunction with the forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf
are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements. We do
not undertake to publicly update or revise our forward-looking statements as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
WEBSITE ACCESS TO COMPANY REPORTS
Copies of our filings
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (including annual reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all
amendments to these reports) are available free of charge on our investor
relations website at www.jonesapparel.com on the same day they are
electronically filed with the SEC.
- 3 -
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. is a
leading designer, marketer and wholesaler of branded apparel, footwear and
accessories. We also market directly to consumers through our chain of specialty
retail and value-based stores and through our e-commerce web sites. Our
nationally recognized brands include Jones New York, Nine West, Anne Klein,
Gloria Vanderbilt, Kasper, Bandolino, Easy Spirit, Evan-Picone, l.e.i., Energie,
Enzo Angiolini, Joan & David, Mootsies Tootsies, Sam & Libby, Napier, Judith
Jack, Albert Nipon and Le Suit. We also market costume jewelry under
the Givenchy brand licensed from Givenchy Corporation, footwear under the
Dockers Women brand licensed from Levi Strauss & Co., and apparel under
the Rachel Roy brand licensed from Rachel Roy IP Company, LLC. Each brand
is differentiated by its own distinctive styling, pricing strategy, distribution
channel and target consumer. We contract for the manufacture of our products
through a worldwide network of quality manufacturers. We have capitalized on our
nationally known brand names by entering into various licenses for several of
our trademarks, including Jones New York, Anne Klein New York, Nine West,
Gloria Vanderbilt, l.e.i. and Evan-Picone, with select manufacturers
of women's and men's products which we do not manufacture. For more than 30
years, we have built a reputation for excellence in product quality and value,
and in operational execution.
Operating Segments
Our operations are comprised of
five revenue-generating segments: wholesale better apparel, wholesale jeanswear,
wholesale footwear and accessories, retail and licensing. We identify operating
segments based on, among other things, the way our management organizes the
components of our business for purposes of allocating resources and assessing
performance. Segment revenues are generated from the sale of apparel, footwear
and accessories through wholesale channels, our own retail locations and several
e-commerce web sites that we operate. See "Business Segment and Geographic Area
Information" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Wholesale Better Apparel
Our brands cover a broad array of
categories for the women's markets. Within those brands, various product
classifications include career and casual sportswear, jeanswear, dresses, suits,
and a combination of all components termed lifestyle collection. Career and
casual sportswear are marketed as individual items or groups of skirts, pants,
shorts, jackets, blouses, sweaters and related accessories which, while sold as
separates, are coordinated as to styles, color schemes and fabrics, and are
designed to be worn together. New collections are introduced in the four
principal selling seasons - Spring, Summer, Fall and Holiday. Each season is
comprised of a series of individual items or groups which have systematically
spaced shipment dates to ensure a fresh flow of goods to the retail floor. In
addition, certain brands offer key item styles, which are less seasonal in
nature, on a replenishment basis (which ship generally within three to five days
from receipt of order).
The following table summarizes
selected aspects of the products sold under both our brands and licensed brands:
- 4 -
Group
|
Category
|
Products
|
Brand
|
Product
Classification
|
Retail
Price
Points
|
Jones
New
York
|
Better |
Skirts,
blouses, pants, jackets, sweaters, jeanswear, suits, dresses, casual tops,
outerwear, shorts |
Jones New York
Jones New York Signature
Jones New York Sport
Jones Jeans
Jones New York Dress
Jones New York Suit
Jones Wear
Jones & Co
Jones Studio
|
Career
Lifestyle
Lifestyle
Lifestyle
Dresses
Suits
Dresses
Career
Dresses |
$31 -
$359
$24 - $349
$10 - $249
$36 - $59
$79 - $259
$200 - $246
$60 - $90
$44 - $94
$50 - $70 |
Nine
West
|
Better
|
Skirts, blouses,
pants,
jackets, sweaters, suits, dresses, outerwear, shorts, casual tops,
jeanswear |
Nine West
Nine West Dress
Nine West Suits
Nine West Denim |
Career
Dresses
Suits
Lifestyle |
$20 - $309
$117 - $299
$139 - $246
$34 - $109 |
Anne
Klein
|
Bridge |
Skirts, blouses, pants,
jackets, sweaters, dresses |
Anne Klein New York |
Lifestyle |
$114
- $895 |
Anne
Klein
|
Better |
Skirts,
blouses, pants, jackets, sweaters, vests, dresses, casual tops, jeanswear |
AK
Anne Klein
AK Sport
Anne Klein Dress
Anne Klein Suit
Anne Klein Denim |
Lifestyle
Lifestyle
Dresses
Suits
Lifestyle |
$35
- $432
$59 - $89
$113 - $267
$209 - $360
$22 - $99 |
Other |
Designer |
Skirts,
blouses, pants, jackets, sweaters, dresses, outerwear, accessories |
Rachel Roy New York |
Designer |
$200
- $2,500 |
Other |
Bridge |
Suits |
Albert
Nipon |
Suits |
$240
- $540 |
Other |
Better |
Skirts,
blouses, pants,
jackets, sweaters,
suits, dresses |
Kasper
Evan-Picone
Le Suit
Rena Rowan |
Suits, Dresses, Sportswear
Suits, Dresses
Suits
Dresses |
$24
- $320
$45 - $240
$139
- - $240
$80 - $158 |
Wholesale Jeanswear
Our brands cover a broad array of
categories for the women's, juniors and girls markets. Within those brands, our
product classifications include jeanswear, casual sportswear and dresses, with a
focus on fit, fabric and finish. Jeanswear and casual sportswear are designed
and marketed as individual items of skirts, pants, shorts, jackets, casual tops,
sweaters and related accessories which, while sold as separates, can be combined
with each other and with certain of our wholesale better products into groups
termed "lifestyle collection" that are designed to be worn together. New
collections are introduced in the four principal selling seasons - Spring,
Summer, Fall and Holiday. Each season is comprised of a series of individual
items or groups which have scheduled shipment dates to ensure a fresh flow of
goods to the retail floor. In addition, certain brands offer key item styles,
which are less seasonal in nature, on a replenishment basis (which ship
generally within five days from receipt of order).
The following table summarizes
selected aspects of the products sold under our brands:
- 5 -
Group
|
Products
|
Brand
|
Product
Classification
|
Retail
Price
Points
|
Jones
New
York
|
Skirts, blouses,
jackets, sweaters,
casual tops |
Jones Wear
Jones Wear Studio |
Collection Sportswear
Collection Sportswear |
$32 -
$200 |
Gloria
Vanderbilt
|
Skirts, blouses, shorts,
jackets, sweaters,
jeanswear, capris,
casual tops |
Gloria Vanderbilt |
Casual Sportswear |
$13
- $48 |
Other
|
Skirts, blouses, pants, jackets, sweaters, jeanswear, dresses,
casual tops and bottoms |
Evan-Picone
Energie
l.e.i.
Bandolino Blu
GLO/GLO Girls
Grane |
Collection Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear |
$8 - $206 |
In addition to the products sold
under these brands, we provide design and manufacturing resources to certain
retailers to develop moderately-priced product lines to be sold under private
labels.
Wholesale Footwear and Accessories
Our wholesale footwear and
accessories operations include the sale of both brand name and private label
footwear, handbags, small leather goods and costume, semi-precious, sterling
silver, and marcasite jewelry. The following table summarizes selected aspects
of the products sold under both our brands and licensed brands:
Footwear |
|
|
|
Retail
Price Points
|
Category
|
Brand
|
Product
Classification
|
Shoes
|
Boots
|
Bridge |
Joan & David |
Sophisticated
Classics |
$138
- $200 |
$158 - $250 |
Better |
Nine West
Nine West Kids
Enzo Angiolini
AK Anne Klein
Circa Joan & David
Boutique 9 |
Contemporary
Children's
Sophisticated Classics
Modern Classics
Sophisticated Classics
Contemporary |
$23 - $119
$29 -$45
$69 - $140
$49 - $95
$50 - $140
$110 - $160 |
$69 - $225
$40 - $49
$120 - $275
$89 - $199
$105 - $250
$145 - $299 |
Upper
Moderate |
Bandolino
Easy Spirit |
Modern Classics
Comfort/Fit,
Active,
Sport/Casuals |
$29 - $79
$45 - $129 |
$89 -
$169
$69 - $189 |
Moderate |
Nine & Company
Mootsies Tootsies
Mootsies Tootsies Kids
Sam & Libby
Sam
& Libby Kids
Dockers Women |
Contemporary
Lifestyle
Children's
Contemporary
Children's
Lifestyle |
$59
- $70
$40 - $50
$25 - $29
$40 - $60
$30 - $35
$55 - $60 |
$65
- $70
$55 -
$60
---
$50 - $55
$35 - $40
$60 - $75 |
- 6 -
Accessories
|
Category
|
Brand
|
Product Classification
|
Retail Price
Points
|
Bridge |
Judith Jack |
Marcasite and Sterling Silver Jewelry |
$55 - $795 |
Better |
AK
Anne Klein
Nine West
Givenchy |
Handbags,
Small Leather Goods
and Costume Jewelry
Handbags,
Small Leather Goods
and Costume Jewelry
Costume and Fashion
Jewelry |
$18 -
$250
$18 - $195
$8 - $695 |
Moderate |
Nine & Company
Napier |
Handbags, Small
Leather Goods and
Costume Jewelry
Costume Jewelry |
$12
- $54
$8 - $75 |
Retail
We market apparel, footwear and
accessories directly to consumers through our specialty retail stores operating
in malls and urban retail centers, our various value-based ("outlet") stores
located in major retail locations, and on several e-commerce web sites that we
operate. We constantly evaluate both the opportunities for new locations and the
results of underperforming locations for possible modifications or closures.
Specialty Retail Stores. At
December 31, 2008, we operated a total of 373 specialty retail stores. These
stores sell either footwear and accessories or apparel (or a combination of
these products) primarily under their respective brand names. Our Nine West,
Easy Spirit, Bandolino and AK Anne Klein retail stores offer selections of
exclusive products not marketed to our wholesale customers. Specialty retail
stores may also sell products licensed by us, including belts, legwear,
outerwear, watches and sunglasses. We also opened our first multibranded
specialty store under the ShoeWoo name in 2008.
The following table summarizes
selected aspects of our specialty retail stores at December 31, 2008. Of these
stores, 370 are located within the United States and its territories and three
are located in Canada.
|
|
|
Retail Price Range
|
|
Average
store
size (sq. ft.)
|
Store
type
|
Number of
locations
|
Brands
offered
|
Shoes and
Boots
|
Accessories
|
Apparel
|
Type of
locations
|
Nine West |
207 |
Primarily
Nine West |
$29 -$299 |
$6 - $350 |
$89 - $225 |
Upscale and regional malls and urban retail centers |
1,595 |
Easy Spirit |
91 |
Primarily
Easy Spirit |
$20 -
$189 |
$5 -
$120 |
$59 -
$109 |
Upscale and regional malls and
urban retail centers |
1,391 |
Bandolino |
63 |
Primarily
Bandolino |
$39 -
$169 |
$6 -
$79 |
$48 -
$120 |
Urban retail
locations and regional malls |
1,408 |
AK Anne
Klein |
8 |
Anne
Klein |
$59 -
$199 |
$22 -
$208 |
$49 -
$432 |
Upscale
urban retail
locations and regional malls |
1,425 |
Apparel |
3 |
Various |
--- |
--- |
$24 -
$432 |
Urban retail
locations and regional malls |
5,799 |
ShoeWoo |
1 |
Various |
$18
- $299 |
$8
- $350 |
--- |
Upscale
mall |
2,964 |
Outlet Stores. At December
31, 2008, we operated a total of 644 outlet stores. Our shoe stores focus on
breadth of product line, as well as value pricing, and offer a distribution
channel for our residual inventories. The majority of the shoe stores'
merchandise consists of new production of current and proven prior season's
styles, with the remainder of the merchandise consisting of discontinued styles
- 7 -
from our specialty retail footwear stores and wholesale divisions. The
apparel stores focus on breadth of product line and value pricing. In addition
to our brand name merchandise, these stores also sell merchandise produced by
our licensees.
The following table summarizes
selected aspects of our outlet stores at December 31, 2008. Of these stores, 614
are located within the United States and its territories and 30 are located in
Canada.
Store
type
|
Number of
locations
|
Brands
offered
|
Type of
locations
|
Average
store
size (sq. ft.)
|
Nine West |
210 |
Primarily Nine West |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
2,933 |
Jones New York |
170 |
Primarily Jones New
York and
Jones New York Sport |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
3,837 |
Easy Spirit |
121 |
Primarily Easy Spirit |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
3,513 |
Kasper |
84 |
Primarily Kasper |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
2,630 |
Anne Klein |
59 |
Primarily Anne Klein |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
2,656 |
Internet. At December 31,
2008, we operated e-commerce web sites at www.ninewest.com, www.easyspirit.com,
www.bandolino.com and www.jny.com. We also plan to launch www.anneklein.com in
early 2009. Through these web sites, we market either footwear and accessories,
apparel or a combination of these products, primarily under their respective
brand names. The selection of products is substantially consistent with the
product offerings in our corresponding retail store concepts. Our e-commerce
systems allow us to fulfill customer orders from inventory at our retail store
locations if the items are not available at our distribution center.
Licensed Brands
We have an exclusive license to
produce, market and distribute costume jewelry in the United States, Canada,
Mexico and Japan under the Givenchy trademark pursuant to an agreement with
Givenchy, which expires on December 31, 2011. The agreement requires us to
pay a percentage of net sales against guaranteed minimum royalty and advertising
payments as set forth in the agreement.
We have an exclusive license to
produce and sell women's footwear under the Dockers Women trademark in
the United States (including its territories and possessions) and Canada
pursuant to an agreement with Levi Strauss & Co. The agreement, which expires on
December 31, 2011, requires us to pay a percentage of net sales against
guaranteed minimum royalty and advertising payments as set forth in the
agreement. In early 2009, we signed a similar agreement with Levi Strauss & Co. which
gives us an exclusive license to produce and sell boys' footwear under the
Dockers trademark in the United States (including its territories and
possessions). This agreement expires on December 31, 2011.
We have an exclusive license with
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. and its affiliate New Balance Licensing, LLC
(together, "New Balance") to create and distribute a fashion-lifestyle footwear
collection that brings together New Balance's innovative performance and
materials technology with Nine West's fashion styling. Under the agreement,
which expires December 31, 2009, the initial collection will offer active
lifestyle fashion footwear with performance technology, and will be available in
a limited distribution nationwide and internationally in 2009. Manufacturing and
production for the collection will be split between the companies: New Balance
will be responsible for the innovative material direction, casual and athletic
footwear styling and insole technology while Nine West will be responsible for
fashion footwear, soft-tech styling and color. This effort will be supported by
an integrated marketing campaign, including public relations, events, and a
combination of digital and traditional media. The agreement requires us to pay a
percentage of net sales as set forth in the agreement.
- 8 -
Design
Our apparel product lines have
design teams that are responsible for the creation, development and coordination
of the product group offerings within each line. We believe our design staff is
recognized for its distinctive styling of garments and its ability to update
fashion classics with contemporary trends. Our apparel designers travel
throughout the world for fabrics and colors, and stay continuously abreast of
the latest fashion trends. In addition, we actively monitor the retail sales of
our products to determine and react to changes in consumer trends.
For most sportswear lines, we will
develop several groups in a season. A group typically consists of an assortment
of skirts, pants, jeans, shorts, jackets, blouses, sweaters, t-shirts and
various accessories. We believe that we are able to reduce design risks because
we often will not have started cutting fabrics until the first few weeks of a
major selling season. Since different styles within a group often use the same
fabric, we can redistribute styles and, in some cases, colors, to fit current
market demand. We also have a key item replenishment program for certain lines
which consists of core products that reflect little variation from season to
season.
Our footwear and accessories
product lines are developed by a combination of our own design teams and
third-party designers, which independently interpret global lifestyle, clothing,
footwear and accessories trends. To research and confirm such trends, the teams
travel extensively in Asia, Europe and major American markets, conduct extensive
market research on retailer and consumer preferences, and subscribe to fashion
and color information services. Each team presents styles that maintain each
brand's distinct personality. Samples are refined and then produced. After the
samples are evaluated, lines are modified further for presentation at each
season's shoe shows and accessory markets.
Our jewelry brands are developed
by separate design teams. Each team presents styles that maintain each brand's
distinct personality. A prototype is developed for each new product where
appropriate. Most prototypes are produced by our contractors based on technical
drawings that we supply. These prototypes are reviewed by our product
development team, who negotiate costs with the contractors. After samples are
evaluated and cost estimates are received, the lines are modified as needed for
presentation for each selling season.
In accordance with standard
industry practices for licensed products, we have the right to approve the
concepts and designs of all products produced and distributed by our licensees.
Similarly, Givenchy and Levi Strauss & Co. also provide design services to us
for our licensed products and have the right to approve our designs for the
Givenchy and Dockers Women product lines, respectively. Under the New
Balance license, we have the right to approve the concepts, designs, prototypes,
samples and packaging materials produced by New Balance, and New Balance has
similar rights to approve the concepts, designs, prototypes, samples and
packaging materials produced by us.
Manufacturing and Quality Control
Apparel
Apparel sold by us is produced in
accordance with our design, specification and production schedules through an
extensive network of independent factories located throughout the world,
primarily in Asia, with additional denim production located in the Middle East
and Africa. Nearly all our apparel products were manufactured outside North
America during 2008.
We believe that outsourcing our
products allows us to maximize production flexibility, while avoiding
significant capital expenditures, work-in-process inventory build-ups and costs
of managing a larger production work force. Our fashion designers, production
staff and quality control personnel closely examine garments manufactured by
contractors to ensure that they meet our high standards.
Our comprehensive quality control
program is designed to ensure that raw materials and finished goods meet our
exacting standards. Fabrics and trims for garments manufactured are inspected by
either independent inspection services or by our contractors upon receipt in
their warehouses. Our quality
- 9 -
control program includes inspection of both prototypes of each garment prior
to cutting by the contractors and a sampling of production garments upon receipt
at our warehouse facilities to ensure compliance with our specifications.
Our foreign manufacturers'
operations are primarily monitored by our Hong Kong-based personnel, buying
agents located in other countries and independent contractors and inspection
services. Finished goods are generally shipped to our warehouses for final
inspection and distribution.
In addition, our apparel products
are tested to ensure compliance with applicable consumer product safety laws and
regulations.
For our sportswear business, we
occasionally supply the raw materials to our manufacturers. Otherwise, the raw
materials are purchased directly by the manufacturer in accordance with our
specifications. Raw materials, which are in most instances made and/or colored
especially for us, consist principally of piece goods and yarn and are purchased
by us from a number of domestic and foreign textile mills and converters.
Our primary raw material in our
jeanswear business is denim, which is primarily purchased from leading mills
located in the Pacific Rim and sub-continent. Denim purchase commitments and
prices are negotiated on a quarterly or semi-annual basis. We perform our own
extensive testing of denim, cotton twill and other fabrics to ensure consistency
and durability.
We do not have long-term
arrangements with any of our suppliers. We have experienced little difficulty in
satisfying our raw material requirements and consider our sources of supply
adequate. Our products have historically been purchased from foreign
manufacturers in pre-set United States dollar prices. To date, we generally have
not been materially adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates.
However, a substantial decline of the United States dollar against major world
currencies, coupled with higher labor costs being experienced by some of our
foreign manufacturers, primarily in China, could cause our manufacturing costs
to rise.
Our apparel products are
manufactured according to plans prepared each year which reflect prior years'
experience, current fashion trends, economic conditions and management estimates
of a line's performance. We generally order piece goods concurrently with
concept development. The purchase of piece goods is controlled and coordinated
on a divisional basis. When possible, we limit our exposure to specific colors
and fabrics by committing to purchase only a portion of total projected demand
with options to purchase additional volume if demand meets the plan.
We believe our extensive
experience in logistics and production management underlies our success in
coordinating with contractors who manufacture different garments included within
the same product group. We also contract for the production of a portion of our
products through a network of foreign agents. We have had long-term mutually
satisfactory business relationships with many of our contractors and agents but
do not have long-term written agreements with any of them.
Footwear and Accessories
To provide a steady source of
inventory, we rely on long-standing relationships with manufacturers in Asia. We
work through independent buying agents for footwear and our own offices for
accessories and jewelry. We do not have formal purchase agreements with any of our manufacturers.
Allocation of production among our manufacturing resources is determined based
upon a number of factors, including manufacturing capabilities, delivery
requirements and pricing.
During 2008, nearly all our
footwear products were manufactured by independent footwear manufacturers
located in Asia (primarily China). Our handbags and small leather goods are
sourced through our own buying office in China, which utilizes independent third
party manufacturers located primarily in China. Our products have historically
been purchased in pre-set United States dollar prices. To date, we generally
have not been materially adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates.
However, a substantial decline of the United States dollar against major world
currencies, coupled with
- 10 -
higher labor costs being experienced by some of our foreign manufacturers,
primarily in China, could cause our manufacturing costs to rise.
For footwear, quality control
reviews are done on-site in the factories by our third-party buying agents
primarily to ensure that material and component qualities and fit of the product
are in accordance with our specifications. For accessories, quality control
reviews are done on-site in the factories by our own locally-based inspection
technicians. Our quality control program includes approval of prototypes, as
well as approval of final production samples to ensure they meet our high
standards. In addition, our footwear and accessories products are tested to
ensure compliance with applicable consumer product safety laws and regulations.
We believe that our relationships
with our Chinese manufacturers provide us with a responsive and adequate source
of supply of our products and, accordingly, give us a significant competitive
advantage. We also believe that purchasing a significant percentage of our
products through independent third-party manufacturers in China allows us to
maximize production flexibility while limiting our capital expenditures,
work-in-process inventory and costs of managing a larger production work force.
Because of sophisticated footwear manufacturing techniques, individual
production lines can be quickly changed from one style to another, and
production of certain styles can be completed in as few as four hours, from
uncut leather to boxed footwear.
We place our projected orders for
each season's styles with our manufacturers prior to the time we have received
all of our customers' orders. Because of our close working relationships with
our third party manufacturers (which allow for flexible production schedules and
production of large quantities of footwear within a short period of time), many
of our orders are finalized only after we have received orders from a majority
of our customers. As a result, we are better able to meet sudden demands for particular designs,
more quickly exploit market trends as they occur, reduce inventory risk and more
efficiently fill reorders booked during a particular season.
We believe that the quality and
cost of products manufactured by our suppliers provide us with the ability to
remain competitive. We also have our own manufacturing facility to satisfy
demand for products manufactured domestically (such as cosmetic containers) and
to provide product samples, prototypes, small quantities of test merchandise and
a small amount of production capacity in the event of a disruption of certain
outsourced manufacturing. We have historically experienced little difficulty in
satisfying finished goods requirements, and we consider our source of supplies
adequate.
During 2008, our jewelry products
were manufactured primarily by independently-owned jewelry manufacturers in
Asia. Sourcing the majority of our products from third-party manufacturers
enables us to better control costs and avoid significant capital expenditures,
work in process inventory, and costs of managing a larger production workforce.
Our products have historically been purchased from Asian manufacturers in
pre-set United States dollar prices. To date, we generally have not been
materially adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. However, a
substantial decline of the United States dollar against major world currencies,
coupled with higher labor costs being experienced by some of our foreign
manufacturers, primarily in China, could cause our manufacturing costs to rise.
Forecasts for basic jewelry
products are produced on a rolling 12-week basis and are adjusted based on point
of sale information from retailers. Manufacturing of fashion jewelry products is
based on marketing forecasts and sales plans; actual orders are received several
weeks after such forecasts are produced. Quality control testing is performed
on-site by domestic employees or our own locally-based inspection technicians.
Quality assurance checks are also performed upon receipt of finished goods at
our distribution facilities.
- 11 -
Imports and Import Restrictions
Our transactions with our foreign
manufacturers and suppliers are subject to the risks of doing business abroad.
Imports into the United States are affected by, among other things, the cost of
transportation and the imposition of import duties and restrictions. The United
States, China and other countries in which our products are manufactured may,
from time to time, impose new quotas, duties, tariffs or other restrictions, or
adjust presently prevailing quotas, duty or tariff levels, which could affect
our operations and our ability to import products at current or increased
levels. We cannot predict the likelihood or frequency of any such events
occurring.
On January 1, 2005, the World
Trade Organization's 148 member nations lifted all quotas on apparel and
textiles. As a result, all textiles and textile apparel manufactured in a member
nation and exported after January 1, 2005 are no longer subject to quota
restrictions. A special safeguard provision that had provided the U.S. with an
additional four years beyond January 1, 2005 to apply quotas on Chinese imports
of textiles expired on December 31, 2008. The lifting of quotas and expiration
of safeguard provisions allows retailers, apparel firms and others to import
unlimited quantities of apparel and textile items from China, India and other
low-cost countries, which could lead to lower production costs, allow us to
improve the quality of our products for a given cost, or allow us to concentrate
production in the most efficient markets. However, litigation and political activity have been initiated by interested parties
seeking to re-impose quotas. In addition, if the prices of the imported goods
can be shown to be less than those offered by domestic producers for the same
items, the U.S. International Trade Commission may recommend that anti-dumping
duties be imposed on those goods. As a result, we are unable to predict the
long-term effects of the lifting of quota restrictions and related events on our
results of operations.
Our imported products are also
subject to United States customs duties and, in the ordinary course of business,
we are from time to time subject to claims by the United States Customs Service
for duties and other charges.
We monitor duty, tariff and
quota-related developments and continually seek to minimize our potential
exposure in these areas through, among other measures, geographical
diversification of our manufacturing sources, the maintenance of overseas
offices and shifts of production among countries and manufacturers.
Because our foreign manufacturers
are located at significant geographic distances from us, we are generally
required to allow greater lead time for foreign orders, which reduces our
manufacturing flexibility. Foreign imports are also affected by the high cost of
transportation into the United States and the effects of fluctuations in the
value of the dollar against foreign currencies in certain countries.
In addition to the factors
outlined above, our future import operations may be adversely affected by
political instability resulting in the disruption of trade from exporting
countries and restrictions on the transfer of funds.
Marketing
Our ten largest customer groups,
principally department stores, accounted for approximately 58% of gross revenues
in 2008. Macy's, Inc., our largest customer in 2008, accounted for 21% of our
2008 gross revenues.
We believe that purchasing
decisions are generally made independently by individual department stores
within a commonly controlled group. There has been a trend, however, toward more
centralized purchasing decisions. As such decisions become more centralized, the
risk to us of such concentration increases. Furthermore, we believe a trend
exists among our major customers to concentrate purchasing among a narrowing
group of vendors. In the future, retailers may have financial problems or
continue to consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, or realign
their affiliations, any of which could increase the concentration of our
customers. We attempt to minimize our credit risk from our concentration of customers by closely monitoring accounts receivable balances
and shipping levels and the ongoing financial performance and credit status of
our customers.
- 12 -
Sportswear products are marketed
to department stores and specialty retailing customers during "market weeks,"
which are generally four to six months in advance of the corresponding industry
selling seasons. While we typically will allocate a six-week period to market a
sportswear line, most major orders are written within the first three weeks of
any market period.
We also provide design and
manufacturing resources to several of our wholesale customers to develop product
lines to be sold under their own private labels. These private label lines
compete directly with our product lines and may receive more prominent
positioning on the retail floor by department stores. While this creates more
competition, we believe that national brands are often preferred by the consumer.
We believe retail demand for our
apparel products is enhanced by our ability to provide our retail accounts and
consumers with knowledgeable sales support. In this regard, we have an
established program to place retail sales specialists in many major department
stores for many of our brands, including Jones New York, Jones New York
Sport, Jones New York Signature, Kasper and Anne Klein. These
individuals have been trained by us to support the sale of our products by
educating other store personnel and consumers about our products and by
coordinating our marketing activities with those of the stores. In addition, the
retail sales specialists provide us with firsthand information concerning
consumer reactions to our products. In addition, we have a program of designated
sales personnel in which a store agrees to designate certain sales personnel who
will devote a substantial portion of their time to selling our products in
return for certain benefits.
We introduce new collections of
footwear at industry-wide shoe shows, held semi-annually in both New York City
and Las Vegas. We also present an interim line to customers during the fall and
spring of each year. We introduce new handbag and small leather goods
collections at market shows that occur five times each year in New York City.
Jewelry products are marketed in New York City showrooms through individual
customer appointments and at five industry-wide market shows each year.
Retailers visit our showrooms at these times to view various product lines and
merchandise.
We market our footwear, handbag
and small leather goods businesses with certain department stores and specialty
retail stores by bringing our retail and sales planning expertise to those
retailers. Under this program, members of branded division management who have
extensive retail backgrounds work with the retailer to create a "focus area" or
"concept shop" within the store that displays the full collection of a single
brand in one area. These individuals assist the department and specialty retail
stores by: providing advice about appropriate product assortment and product
flow; making recommendations about when a product should be re-ordered;
providing sales guidance, including the training of store personnel; and
developing advertising programs with the retailer to promote sales of our
products. In addition, our sales force and field merchandising associates for
footwear, handbags and small leather goods recommend how to display our
products, assist with merchandising displays and educate store personnel about
us and our products. The goal of this approach is to promote high retail sell-throughs
of our products. With this approach, customers are encouraged to devote greater
selling space to our products, and we are better able to assess consumer
preferences, the future ordering needs of our customers, and inventory
requirements.
We work closely with our wholesale
jewelry customers to create long-term sales programs, which include choosing
among our diverse product lines and implementing sales programs at the store
level. A team of sales representatives and sales managers monitor product
performance against plan and are responsible for inventory management, using
point-of-sale information to respond to shifts in consumer preferences.
Management uses this information to adjust product mix and inventory
requirements. In addition, field merchandising associates recommend how to
display our products, assist with merchandising displays and educate store
personnel about us and our products. Retailers are also provided with customized
displays and store-level merchandising designed to maximize sales and inventory
turnover. By providing retailers with in-store product management, we establish
close relationships with retailers, allowing us to maximize product sales and
increase floor space allocated to our product lines. We have also placed retail sales specialists in major
department stores to support the sale of our Napier, Nine West, Givenchy
and Judith Jack jewelry products.
- 13 -
Advertising and Promotion
We employ a cooperative
advertising program for our branded products, whereby we share the cost of
certain wholesale customers' advertising and promotional expenses in newspapers,
magazines and other media up to either a preset maximum percentage of the
customer's purchases or an agreed-upon rate of contribution. An important part
of the marketing program includes prominent displays of our products in
wholesale customers' fashion catalogs as well as in-store shop displays.
We have national advertising
campaigns for the following brands:
- Jones New York Collection and Jones New York Signature (in
fashion and lifestyle magazines),
- Nine West (footwear, apparel, handbags, jewelry and licensed
products, primarily in fashion magazines),
- Bandolino (in fashion magazines),
- l.e.i. (in junior-focused and fashion magazines and radio),
- Anne Klein New York (in fashion magazines), and
- AK Anne Klein (in fashion magazines).
In May 2008, we entered into an
exclusive agreement with country music performer Taylor Swift to be the face of
l.e.i., endorsing the brand through various initiatives including public
relations, concert performances and sweepstakes. Our l.e.i. brand is
sponsoring Ms. Swift's headlining concert tour in 2009 to increase brand
awareness and reinforce the connection between Ms. Swift and the l.e.i.
brand.
Since 2007, "Style Guy" Lloyd
Boston has been the exclusive spokesperson for our Jones New York brand.
In this role, Mr. Boston writes merchandising manuals for Jones New York,
Jones New York Signature and Jones New York Sport, hosts 20 Jones
New York special events through the year in different department stores,
hosts Macy's training on behalf of Jones New York, delivers reports on
style trends for seasonal coordinator meetings and serves as the face of the
brand at www.jny.com. Mr. Boston, who is a style editor on NBC's Today Show and
has appeared as a guest on many other television shows, including Oprah, The
View and CNN American Morning, hosts Closet Cases on Fine Living Network, which
is sponsored by Jones New York.
Given the strong recognition and
brand loyalty already afforded our brands, we believe these campaigns will serve
to further enhance and broaden our customer base. Our in-house creative services
departments oversee the conception, production and execution of virtually all
aspects of these activities. We also believe that our retail network promotes
brand name recognition and supports the merchandising of complete lines by, and
the marketing efforts of, our wholesale customers.
Backlog
We had unfilled customer orders of
approximately $1.0 billion at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. These
amounts include both confirmed and unconfirmed orders which we believe, based on
industry practice and past experience, will be confirmed. The amount of unfilled
orders at a particular time is affected by a number of factors, including the
mix of product, the timing of the receipt and processing of customer orders and
scheduling of the manufacture and shipping of the product, which in some
instances is dependent on the desires of the customer. Backlog is also affected
by a continuing trend among customers to reduce the lead time on their orders.
Due to these factors, a comparison of unfilled orders from period to period is
not necessarily meaningful and may not be indicative of eventual actual
shipments.
- 14 -
Licensing of Company Brands
We have entered into various
license agreements under which independent licensees either manufacture, market
and sell certain products under our trademarks in accordance with designs
furnished or approved by us or distribute our products in certain countries
where we do not do business. These licenses, the terms of which (not including
renewals) expire at various dates through 2012, typically provide for the
payment to us of a percentage of the licensee's net sales of the licensed
products against guaranteed minimum royalty payments, which typically increase
over the term of the agreement.
The following table sets forth
information with respect to select aspects of our licensing business:
Brand
|
Category
|
Jones New York |
Men's
Accessories and Jewelry (U.S., Canada)
Men's Neckwear (Canada)
Men's Neckwear (U.S.)
Men's Sportswear, Sweaters, Knit Shirts, Woven Shirts, Finished Bottom
Slacks and Outerwear (Canada)
Men's Tailored Clothing, Dress Shirts, Outerwear, Dress Slacks (Canada)
Men's Sleepwear (Canada)
Men's Tailored Clothing, Formal Wear (U.S.)
Men's Umbrellas (U.S.)
Men's and Women's Optical Eyewear (U.S., Canada, Argentina, Aruba,
Australia, Bahamas, Barbados,
Belize, Benelux, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Cyprus, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,
El Salvador, Finland, France, French Guiana, Guatemala,
Honduras, Ireland, Israel, Jamaica, Kuwait,
Lebanon, Mexico, Netherlands Antilles, New Zealand,
Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru,
Philippines, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa,
Suriname, Sweden, Trinidad, Turkey, United
Arab Emirates, Uruguay, Venezuela)
Women's Costume Jewelry (Canada)
Women's Hats (U.S., Canada)
Women's Leather Outerwear (U.S.)
Women's Outerwear, Rainwear (U.S.)
Women's Wool Coats (U.S.)
Women's Outerwear, Wool Coats, Rainwear (Canada)
Women's Scarves, Wraps (U.S., Canada)
Women's Sleepwear, Loungewear, Daywear (U.S., Canada)
Women's Sunglasses (U.S., Canada)
Women's Umbrellas, Rain Accessories (U.S.)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Women's Apparel, Handbags,
Small Leather Goods, Footwear,
Belts, Sunglasses, Coats, Scarves, as well as Sleepwear
if such items are made available in the Territory
(China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Macau, Malaysia,
Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand) |
Jones Wear |
Women's Costume Jewelry
(Canada)
Women's Optical Eyewear (U.S.) |
Jones
Studio |
Women's
Outerwear, Wool Coats, Rainwear (Canada) |
Albert Nipon |
Men's Tailored Clothing (U.S.) |
Evan-Picone |
Men's
Tailored Clothing (U.S.)
Manufacturing and Wholesale Distribution Rights
for Women's Sportswear (Japan) |
Energie |
Men's Denim and Sportswear
(U.S.)
Boys' Denim and Sportswear (4-6x and 8-20) (U.S.)
Men's Footwear
(U.S.) |
Gloria Vanderbilt |
Knit Tops,
Bottoms, ActiveWear, Performance ActiveWear (U.S.) |
GLO Jeans |
Junior Outerwear (U.S.) |
- 15 -
Brand
|
Category
|
GRANE |
Junior
Outerwear (U.S.) |
Anne Klein New York
and AK Anne Klein
|
Belts (U.S., Canada, Mexico,
Bermuda)
Home Sewing Patterns (Worldwide)
Hosiery, Casual Legwear (U.S., Canada)
Outerwear, Wool Coats, Leather Outerwear, Rainwear (U.S., Canada)
Scarves, Cold Weather Accessories, Gloves (U.S., Canada)
Sunglasses, Optical Eyewear (Worldwide)
Watches (Worldwide)
Manufacturing and Wholesale and Retail Distribution Rights for Apparel
(Japan)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Handbags (Japan)
Sublicensed Wholesale and Retail Distribution Rights for Scarves,
Towels, Jewelry (Japan)
Manufacturing and Wholesale and Retail Distribution Rights for Apparel,
Handbags, Accessories (Korea)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Apparel (Central America,
South America, Caribbean,
Dominican Republic)
Retail Rights for Belts, Eyewear, Watches, Jewelry, Coats, Sleepwear,
Socks, Scarves, Swimwear, Fragrances and
Cosmetics if any such items are made available in the
Territory (Central America, South America, Caribbean,
Dominican Republic)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Apparel, Belts, Sunglasses,
Watches, Jewelry, Coats, Socks, Scarves,
Swimwear, as well as Sleepwear, Fragrances if such
items are made available in the Territory (China, Hong Kong,
Indonesia, Macau, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan,
Thailand, Italy, France, Spain, United Kingdom, Portugal,
Ireland, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Saudi
Arabia)
Retail Distribution Rights for Apparel, Handbags, Belts, Small Leather
Goods, Scarves, Sleepwear, and
Socks (Philippines) |
Anne Klein Coat |
Outerwear,
Wool Coats, Leather Outerwear, Rainwear (U.S., Canada) |
A|Line |
Sunglasses, Optical Eyewear
(U.S.) |
Nine West |
Belts (U.S.,
Canada)
Casual Legwear (U.S., Canada)
Gloves, Cold Weather Accessories (U.S., Canada)
Hats (U.S., Canada)
Leather, Wool, Casual Outerwear, Rainwear (U.S., Canada, Spain)
Luggage (U.S., Canada)
Optical Eyewear (U.S., Canada, China, Mexico)
Sunglasses (U.S., Canada, Spain)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Apparel, Belts, Cold Weather
Accessories, Hats, Luggage,
Sunglasses, Watches, Jewelry, Coats, Legwear, Scarves,
as well as Sleepwear, Swimwear, Fragrances
and Cosmetics if such items are made available in the
Territory (China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Macau,
Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand) |
Nine & Company |
Hats (U.S.)
Luggage (U.S.)
Sleepwear, Loungewear (U.S.)
Sunglasses (U.S.) |
Easy Spirit |
Slippers
(U.S., Canada) |
l.e.i. |
Hats (U.S., Canada)
Juniors' and
Girls' Intimate Apparel (U.S.)
Juniors' and Girls' Outerwear (U.S.)
Juniors'
and Girls' Sunglasses (U.S., Canada)
Watches (U.S., Canada) |
- 16 -
Brand
|
Category
|
Joan & David |
Manufacturing
and Retail Distribution Rights for Apparel, Footwear, Handbags (China, Hong
Kong, Indonesia,
Japan, Korea, Macau, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore,
Taiwan, Thailand) |
International
footwear and accessories retail/wholesale distribution |
Nine West and Enzo
Angiolini retail locations (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the United
Arab Emirates, Jordan,
India) and AK Anne Klein and Anne Klein New
York retail locations and wholesale distribution rights for AK
Anne Klein and Anne Klein New York footwear
and accessories (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the United
Arab Emirates)
Nine West and AK Anne Klein retail locations (Saudi Arabia,
Lebanon, Egypt)
Nine West and AK Anne Klein retail locations and wholesale
distribution rights for Nine West, Enzo Angiolini,
Bandolino and Easy Spirit footwear and
accessories and AK Anne Klein, Circa Joan & David, Sam & Libby
and Mootsies Tootsies footwear (Belize,
Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras,
Nicaragua, Panama, Venezuela, the Dominican Republic,
French Guiana, Guyana, Suriname, the Caribbean
Islands)
Nine West and AK Anne Klein retail locations and wholesale
distribution rights for Nine West and AK Anne Klein
footwear and accessories (Greece, Cyprus, Bulgaria)
Nine West retail locations and wholesale distribution rights for
Nine West footwear and accessories (Chile, Peru,
Uruguay) and wholesale distribution rights for Enzo
Angiolini footwear and accessories (Chile)
Nine West, AK Anne Klein, Enzo Angiolini, NW Nine West and Easy
Spirit retail locations and wholesale distribution
rights for Nine West, AK Anne Klein, Enzo Angiolini,
NW Nine West and Easy Spirit footwear and accessories
(Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Macau, Malaysia,
the People's Republic of China, the Philippines,
Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia)
Nine West retail locations and wholesale distribution rights for
Nine West footwear and accessories (South Africa)
Nine West, AK Anne Klein, Enzo Angiolini and Westies retail
locations, wholesale distribution rights for Nine West
footwear and accessories and Enzo Angiolini, Westies
and AK Anne Klein footwear, and manufacturing rights for
Westies footwear (Mexico)
Nine West, AK Anne Klein and Enzo Angiolini retail locations
(Turkey, Romania, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan) and
wholesale distribution rights for Enzo Angiolini,
Circa Joan & David, Boutique 9 and AK Anne Klein footwear
(Turkey)
Nine West, AK Anne Klein and Easy Spirit retail locations and
wholesale distribution rights for Nine West, AK Anne
Klein and Easy Spirit footwear and
accessories (Israel)
Nine West, Anne Klein, Bandolino and Easy Spirit retail
locations, wholesale distribution rights for Nine West, Enzo
Angiolini, Easy Spirit, Bandolino, Nine & Company
and Westies footwear and accessories and AK Anne Klein,
Circa Joan & David, Sam & Libby and Mootsies
Tootsies footwear (Canada)
Nine West retail locations (the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Channel
Islands, Denmark, the Netherlands) and wholesale
distribution rights for Nine West and NW Nine
West footwear and accessories and Easy Spirit footwear (the
United
Kingdom, Ireland, the Channel Islands, Norway, Denmark,
Sweden, Finland, Iceland, Belgium, the Netherlands,
Luxembourg, Germany)
Nine West retail locations and wholesale distribution rights for
Nine West, AK Anne Klein and Enzo Angiolini footwear
and accessories (Spain, Portugal, Andorra)
Nine West retail locations (Russia, Poland)
Nine West retail locations (France)
Nine West and Enzo Angiolini retail locations and wholesale
distribution rights for Nine West and Enzo Angiolini
footwear and accessories (Australia, New Zealand)
Wholesale distribution rights for Nine West and Napier costume
jewelry (Canada) |
Investment in GRI
On June 20, 2008, we acquired a
10% equity interest in GRI, an international accessories and apparel brand
management and retail-distribution network, for $20.2 million. GRI, which
(including its franchisees) operates over 800 points of sale in 12 Asian
countries, is the exclusive licensee of several of our brands in Asia, including
Nine West, Anne Klein New York, AK Anne Klein, Easy Spirit, Enzo Angiolini
and Joan & David. GRI also distributes other women's apparel, shoes and
accessory brands.
- 17 -
Trademarks
We utilize a variety of trademarks
which we own, including Jones New York, Jones New York Signature, Jones New
York Sport, Jones New York Jeans, Jones Wear, Evan-Picone, Erika, Energie, Nine
West, Easy Spirit, Enzo Angiolini, Bandolino, Nine & Company, Westies,
Pappagallo, Joan & David, Mootsies Tootsies, Sam & Libby, Napier, Judith Jack,
Gloria Vanderbilt, GLO, l.e.i., Anne Klein, Anne Klein New York, AK Anne Klein,
A|Line, Kasper, Le Suit, Grane, Boutique 9 and Jeanstar. We have
registered or applied for registration for these and other trademarks for use on
a variety of items of apparel, footwear, accessories and/or related products
and, in some cases, for retail store services, in the United States and certain
other countries. The expiration dates of the United States trademark
registrations for our material registered trademarks are as follows, with our
other registered foreign and domestic trademarks expiring at various dates
through 2023. Certain brands such as Jones New York are sold under
several related trademarks; in these instances, the range of expiration dates is
provided. All marks are subject to renewal in the ordinary course of business if
no third party successfully challenges such registrations and, in the case of
domestic and certain foreign registrations, applicable use and related filing
requirements for the goods and services covered by such registrations have been
met.
Trademark
|
Expiration
Dates |
|
Trademark
|
Expiration
Dates |
|
Trademark
|
Expiration
Dates |
Jones New York |
2011-2017 |
|
Nine & Company |
2012-2015
|
|
Anne Klein |
2009-2018 |
Jones New York Sport |
2013 |
|
Napier |
2009 |
|
Kasper |
2011-2018 |
Evan-Picone |
2011-2018 |
|
Judith Jack |
2010-2012 |
|
Le Suit |
2018 |
Nine West |
2009-2018 |
|
Energie |
2015-2018 |
|
Joan & David |
2012-2015 |
Easy Spirit |
2010-2017 |
|
Gloria Vanderbilt |
2012-2017 |
|
Mootsies Tootsies |
2010-2013 |
Enzo Angiolini |
2010-2015 |
|
l.e.i. |
2010-2016 |
|
Sam & Libby |
2013-2017 |
Bandolino |
2011-2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We carefully monitor trademark
expiration dates to provide uninterrupted registration of our material
trademarks. We also license the Givenchy and Dockers Women
trademarks (see "Licensed Brands" above).
We also hold numerous patents
expiring at various dates through 2025 (subject to payment of annuities and/or
periodic maintenance fees) and have additional patent applications pending in
the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We regard our trademarks and
other proprietary rights as valuable assets which are critical in the marketing
of our products. We vigorously monitor and protect our trademarks and patents
against infringement and dilution where legally feasible and appropriate.
Employees
At December 31, 2008, we had
approximately 7,925 full-time employees. This total includes approximately 2,910
in quality control, production, design and distribution positions, approximately
2,015 in administrative, sales, clerical and office positions and approximately
3,000 in our retail stores. We also employ approximately 4,785 part-time
employees, of which approximately 4,675 work in our retail stores.
Approximately 75 of our employees
located in Vaughan, Ontario are members of the Laundry and Linen Drivers and
Industrial Workers Union, which has a collective bargaining agreement with us
expiring on March 15, 2009. Approximately 45 of our employees located in New
York, New York are members of UNITE HERE, which has a collective bargaining
agreement that expires on May 31, 2010. Approximately 270 of our employees
located in El Paso, Texas are members of UNITE HERE, which has a collective
bargaining agreement that expires on October 31, 2009. We consider our relations
with our employees to be satisfactory.
Corporate Responsibility Programs
Factory Monitoring
We implemented a comprehensive
monitoring program in 1996 when we became a participant in the United States
Department of Labor's Apparel Manufacturer's Compliance Program Agreement
("CPA").
- 18 -
Under the CPA and through independent agreements with domestic and foreign
manufacturers that produce our products, we monitor compliance with the Jones
Apparel Group Standards for Contractors and Suppliers ("JAG Standards"). Our
monitoring program evaluates 100% of our global contract factories at least
annually for approved factories, and more frequently for factories with major
non-conformances. With 27 employees spread across five countries, our compliance
staff is multi-lingual, with the majority holding a post-secondary education
degree. In addition to our internal staff, we retain a number of recognized,
unaffiliated third party workplace compliance audit firms to conduct factory
audits on our behalf. In 2008, 1,061 audits were conducted, including 783 by
third party auditors.
Although there are no perfect
monitoring systems, we are constantly improving our program in order to address
compliance issues that we encounter. We believe that a majority of our factories
satisfy our code of conduct requirements. In August 2006, we instituted a scorecard
system to assign risk levels objectively based on audit results. The scorecard
concept is a data-driven process with the underlying premise that not all
violations should be treated equally, and that some findings are more serious
and not as easily corrected as others. By comparing audit results, the scorecard
system allows us to evaluate and determine where monitoring is needed most. Over
time, audit scores reflect the compliance status of a factory, making it a
useful tool for internal production divisions to benchmark their factories,
vendors and agents when making sourcing decisions.
To facilitate factories'
understanding of our expectations and compliance requirements, we recently
released the Jones Corporate Compliance Guidebook, a comprehensive guide to our
compliance standards. The purpose of the guidebook is to provide suppliers with
a detailed, informative and easy-to-follow reference of our expectations in the
areas that we monitor. The Guidebook includes country-specific supplements,
which contain an overview of the legal requirements unique to a country. To
date, we have made the guidebook and supplements available in three languages
(English, Chinese and Vietnamese) and are in the process of drafting additional
country-specific supplements.
Beyond Monitoring
Reliance on audits alone creates the risk that whatever improvements we do see may be
temporary and cosmetic. To address this, a large part of our compliance program
emphasizes uncovering the root causes of factory noncompliance and providing
factories with the tools and training needed to sustain a viable long-term
compliance program.
The basic goal of our "beyond
monitoring" programs is to increase factories' abilities to establish a
sustainable management system. We are moving to a model of partnering with
suppliers to achieve sustainable compliance through proactive solutions. We have
come to understand that factories must embed ethical business practices based on
strong management systems into all of their business operations.
Our beyond monitoring programs
focus on providing factories with the tools and knowledge to take responsibility
for their social compliance practices. From our experience, the process is
complicated and challenges factories' standard business practices. Recognizing
this, we have taken the approach of dividing the programs into three phases:
knowledge transfer, knowledge absorption and knowledge implementation. Together,
these phases create a continuous process of feedback, reinforcement and
improvement.
Since 2007, we have facilitated
numerous training programs which include human resource management, health and
safety, and managing employment relations. As of December 2008, 17 sessions of
training were conducted, and 172 suppliers have attended these trainings.
Ultimately, we believe that if we can help factories to build effective
management systems, we can facilitate and empower factories to create
sustainable solutions.
Our compliance specialists work
closely with factories producing our products to develop and implement
sustainable management systems for labor. By working with the factories
one-on-one, we have seen marked improvements in many of our factories, in areas
such as wages and benefits, health and safety, employees' understanding of their
rights under the local labor laws and communication between management and
workers.
- 19 -
Additionally, we have established
strong relationships with local and U.S. government officials, the International
Labour Organization ("ILO") and trade union representatives. These relationships
promote ongoing dialog and have enabled us to address issues proactively as they
arise in the field.
Internal Alignment
The effectiveness of any supply chain
monitoring effort is dependent on the cooperation and collaboration among
different divisions across a company. On a daily basis, our compliance group
communicates the compliance status of suppliers to internal business units and
provides advice on how we can work together to help key factories to improve. We
recognize that in order for factories to make progress in their labor and health
and safety practices, our internal business units must understand the principles
embodied in the JAG Standards and support monitoring efforts with their
influence over factories.
Starting in 2008, we have been
issuing periodic corporate social responsibility ("CSR") newsletters to all our
employees, to communicate our compliance efforts, the major issues that affect
factories' compliance, and the important CSR issues of the day. Additionally, to
better understand how we as buyers affect a factory's ability to be socially
compliant, we began conducting a "reverse scorecard" survey to obtain feedback
from suppliers. The purpose of the reverse scorecard is to provide suppliers
with an opportunity to offer their opinions as a business partner working with
us along several lines, such as communication, technical support, and time and
action. As we move into 2009, we will be utilizing these results to determine
how we as buyers can be better business partners to our suppliers.
Engagement with Other Interested Parties
Like any multinational company, our
business practices impact a diverse group, including business associates,
governments, trade unions, non-governmental organizations ("NGOs") and employees
both working for us and for the factories making our products. A key element in
our compliance program is engagement with these parties, which encompasses
issues of factory compliance and human rights, and occurs at various levels -
factory, community and multi-lateral initiatives.
At the factory level, we have been
actively involved in the ILO's Better Work program, along with other recognized
international brands. The Better Work program combines independent factory
assessments with advisory and training services to support practical
improvements in factories. It is currently operational in Cambodia, with
programs in Jordan and Vietnam starting in early 2009 and plans to expand to
other countries as well. By joining Better Factories Cambodia, we are committed
to accepting ILO monitoring reports and have stopped auditing factories in
Cambodia. We have also been working closely with the ILO from conception to the
expected implementation of the Better Work Jordan program and are involved in
multi-brand meetings related to the expansion of this global initiative.
Engagement with Better Work gives us a platform for brand cooperation and
benefits our suppliers by reducing their number of audits, which allows them to
focus more of their time toward sustainable improvements.
We have been working with Africa
Now, an international development organization tackling poverty in Africa by
helping small-scale producers and promoting ethical trade, to build its social
auditing programs in Africa. The proceeds that Africa Now receives from
conducting social audits for brands, including ours, provides support for its
programs, such as capacity building, establishment of a permanent presence in
Egypt and developing new social audit teams in countries not currently serviced.
Periodically, we convene vendor
summits in major sourcing countries to bring together a wide variety of partners
and provide them with both updates to our programs and opportunities for
exchanging ideas and concerns. These meetings give participants a forum for
working together to identify challenges and opportunities in the countries in
which they operate, as well as to complete case studies based on real-life
situations we have encountered through our monitoring program. In 2008, we held
vendor summits in Asia, the Middle East and Africa, which were attended by the
majority of our supplier factories. Invitees to these summits also include
agents, trade unions, NGOs and local and U.S. government officials. Ongoing
communications with key participants after these summits makes it possible for
us to stay informed and anticipate potential problems before they occur. The
goal of all of these efforts is to facilitate improvements in the labor
conditions throughout our supply chain.
- 20 -
Philanthropy and Community Involvement
We strive to be a trusted and
responsible member of the communities in which we work and live. To accomplish
this goal, we promote and support employees to make a positive impact, through a
combination of monetary and product donations and volunteer support. In 2008, we
and our associates contributed time and money to a number of causes at the local
community, national and global levels.
In May 2005, we launched a
charitable cause initiative, including the establishment of Jones New York In
The Classroom, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation, with an initial grant from us
of $1 million and a commitment of our continued support. Jones New York In The
Classroom is dedicated to improving the quality of education in America and
inspiring others, both individuals and corporations, to do the same through
support of teachers and vital teacher-based programs in America's schools. It is
focused on four areas of support for teachers: recruitment, retention,
professional development and recognition and support.
Our commitment since the launch in
2005 has also included support for events to raise public awareness of Jones New
York In The Classroom and its goals for teachers and education, as well as
initiatives to encourage our employees to participate in volunteer opportunities
and fundraising for Jones New York In The Classroom, and the other non-profit
organizations it supports. Our corporate employees have the opportunity to
volunteer up to three hours of paid time off each month in educational
facilities in their local communities. Each of our business locations is
encouraged to raise or budget funds to adopt a classroom to help with daily
classroom needs through Adopt-A-Classroom. Additional activities of Jones New
York In The Classroom can be found at www.jnyintheclassroom.org.
In addition to the localized
community efforts, we took part in a number of national and industry-sponsored
fundraising events. These efforts included either monetary or product donations
to the American Heart Association, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Dress for
Success, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation, Fashion Footwear Association of
New York (FFANY) Shoes on Sale, Ovarian Cancer Research Fund, and St. Jude's
Children's Research Hospital.
On a global level, we donated
product to various charitable organizations world-wide. These organizations
include: Gifts In Kind International, Samaritan's Feet, Soles for Souls, and the
Susie Reizod Foundation, all of which donate shoes to community charities,
children, or the indigent in the United States and abroad. This past year also
witnessed one of the worst earthquakes in Chinese history. In an effort to help
those displaced by the earthquake; we challenged our associates to make
donations to the cause and matched 100% of employee contributions, which was
donated to the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies,
and the Hong Kong Red Cross China Relief fund.
The Greening of Jones Apparel Group
With a goal of reducing our carbon
footprint, we have established an Executive Green Committee to explore
environmental opportunities throughout the company. The Executive Green
Committee consists of ten strategic business executives having direct impact on
our decisions to incorporate green initiatives. Additionally, we have identified
more than 200 of our associates to be "eco-ambassadors" working in parallel with
the Executive Green Committee to raise environmental awareness among employees,
exemplify green practices in the workplace, and brainstorm new ways to increase
efficiencies and adopt environmentally-friendly practices.
Energy Reduction in the Distribution Centers and Retail Locations
We have been exploring innovative
ways to reduce costs while obtaining environmental benefits. We implemented a
lighting retrofit solution in an effort to reduce energy use at our West
Deptford, N.J., distribution centers, which was completed in May 2008. The West
Deptford pre-project vs. post-project power meter readings showed a reduction in
kilowatt use, yielding a reduction in the electricity costs. Additionally, we
are improving lighting at our retail store locations. Lighting retrofits and
replacements of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems are
reducing not only energy use, but financial costs as well. In retail stores, the
new lighting fixtures generate less heat, decreasing HVAC energy use. Based on the results of these projects, we are committed to
explore similar opportunities in other distribution centers.
- 21 -
Reduce the Use
Our REDUCE THE USE campaign has been
put in place to create awareness, to decrease our use of paper and other
supplies and to lower the overall costs of paper products. Additional
initiatives to control costs and reduce consumption are in process or under
consideration, including converting to recycled materials wherever
cost-feasible.
Green Collateral and Packaging Initiative
The goal and mission of the JAGreen
Printed Materials & Packaging Group is to evaluate the current use of paper as
it relates to our hangtags, shoeboxes, shopping bags and printed collateral to
begin to move toward more significant use of recycled, renewable and Forest
Stewardship Council (FSC) rated materials without increases in costs.
Additionally, we are working with other industry leaders to develop
environmentally-friendly hangers.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially
from those anticipated. Risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect us
include, without limitation, the following factors.
The apparel, footwear and
accessories industries are heavily influenced by general economic cycles that
affect consumer spending. A prolonged period of depressed consumer spending
would have a material adverse effect on us.
The apparel, footwear and
accessories industries have historically been subject to cyclical variations,
recessions in the general economy and uncertainties regarding future economic
prospects that affect consumer spending habits, which could negatively impact
our business. The success of our operations depends on a number of factors
impacting discretionary consumer spending, including general economic
conditions, consumer confidence, wages and unemployment, housing prices,
consumer debt, interest rates, fuel and energy costs, taxation and political
conditions. A continuation or worsening of the current downturn in the economy
may affect consumer purchases of our products and adversely impact our growth
and profitability.
The current state of the
economy and the tightening of commercial credit markets may impair our ability
to obtain credit on favorable terms.
We rely on our revolving credit
facilities for backing the issuance of trade letters of credit and other supply
chain purposes, and also from time to time for cash borrowings for working
capital and general corporate purposes. Our current $600 million revolving
credit facility matures on May 16, 2010. The loss of the use of this facility or
the inability to replace this facility when it expires would materially impair
our ability to purchase product from our network of independent foreign
manufacturers. In addition, considering the uncertainties of the present
economic environment, it is possible, in general, that one or more committed
lenders would not meet its obligations to lend to borrowers.
We may not be able to respond
to changing fashion and retail trends in a timely manner, which could have a
material adverse effect on us.
The apparel, footwear and
accessories industries have historically been subject to rapidly changing
fashion trends and consumer preferences. We believe that our success is largely
dependent on our ability to anticipate and respond promptly to changing consumer
demands and fashion trends in the design, styling and production of our products
and in the merchandising and pricing of products in our retail stores. If we do
not gauge consumer needs and fashion trends and respond appropriately, then
consumers may not purchase our products. This would result in reduced sales and
profitability and in excess inventories, which would have a material adverse
effect on us.
- 22 -
We believe that consumers in the
United States are shopping less in department stores (our traditional
distribution channel) and more in other channels, such as specialty shops and
mid-tier locations where value is perceived to be higher. In response, our strategy
involves adding new distribution channels, increasing investment in our core
brands by focusing on design, quality and value, remodeling our retail locations
and implementing new and enhanced retail systems. Despite our efforts to respond
to these trends, there can be no assurance that these trends will not have a
material adverse effect on us.
The loss of or a significant
reduction of business with any of our largest customers would have a material
adverse effect on us.
Our ten largest customer groups,
principally department stores, accounted for approximately 58% of revenues in
2008. Macy's, Inc. accounted for approximately 21% of our 2008 gross revenues.
We believe that purchasing
decisions are generally made independently by department store units within a
customer group. There has been a trend, however, toward more centralized
purchasing decisions. As such decisions become more centralized, the risk to us
of such concentration increases. A decision by the controlling owner of a
customer group of department stores to modify those customers' relationships
with us (for example, decreasing the amount of product purchased from us,
modifying floor space allocated to apparel in general or our products
specifically, or focusing on promotion of private label products rather than our
products) could have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, we believe a
trend exists among our major customers to concentrate purchasing among a
narrowing group of vendors. To the extent any of our key customers reduces the
number of vendors and consequently does not purchase from us, this would have a
material adverse effect on us.
In the future, retailers may have
financial problems or consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, or
realign their affiliations, any of which could further increase the
concentration of our customers. The loss of any of our largest customers, or the
bankruptcy or material financial difficulty of any large customer, could have a
material adverse effect on us. We do not have long-term contracts with any of
our customers, and sales to customers generally occur on an order-by-order
basis. As a result, customers can terminate their relationships with us at any
time or under certain circumstances cancel or delay orders.
The apparel, footwear and
accessories industries are highly competitive. Any increased competition could
result in reduced sales or prices, or both, which could have a material adverse
effect on us.
Apparel, footwear and accessories companies face competition on many fronts,
including the following:
- establishing and maintaining favorable brand recognition;
- developing products that appeal to consumers;
- pricing products appropriately; and
- obtaining access to retail outlets and sufficient floor space.
There is intense competition in
the sectors of the apparel, footwear and accessories industries in which we
participate. We compete with many other manufacturers and retailers, some of
which are larger and have greater resources than we do. Any increased
competition could result in reduced sales or prices, or both, which could have a
material adverse effect on us.
We compete primarily on the basis
of fashion, price and quality. We believe our competitive advantages include our
ability to anticipate and respond quickly to changing consumer demands, our
brand names and range of products and our ability to operate within the
industries' production and delivery constraints. Furthermore, our established
brand names and relationships with retailers have resulted in a loyal following
of customers.
- 23 -
We believe that, during the past
few years, major department stores and specialty retailers have been
increasingly sourcing products from suppliers who are well capitalized or have
established reputations for delivering quality merchandise in a timely manner.
However, there can be no assurance that significant new competitors will not
develop in the future.
We also provide design and
manufacturing resources to several of our wholesale customers to develop product
lines to be sold under their own private labels. These private label lines
compete directly with our product lines and may receive more prominent
positioning on the retail floor by department stores. While this creates more
competition, we believe that national brands are often preferred by the
consumer.
The loss of key personnel could
disrupt our operations and our ability to successfully execute our strategies.
Our executive officers and other
members of senior management have substantial experience and expertise in our
business. Our success depends to a significant extent both upon the continued
services of these individuals as well as our ability to attract, hire, motivate
and retain additional talented and highly qualified management in the future.
Competition for key executives in the apparel, footwear and accessories
industries is intense, and our operations and the execution of our business
strategies could be adversely affected if we cannot attract and retain qualified
executives and other key personnel.
Our reliance on independent
manufacturers could cause delay and damage our reputation and customer
relationships.
We rely upon independent third
parties for the manufacture of most of our products. A manufacturer's failure to
ship products to us in a timely manner or to meet the required quality standards
could cause us to miss the delivery date requirements of our customers for those
items. The failure to make timely deliveries may drive customers to cancel
orders, refuse to accept deliveries or demand reduced prices, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on us. This could damage our reputation. We do
not have long-term written agreements with any of our third party manufacturers.
As a result, any of these manufacturers may unilaterally terminate their
relationships with us at any time.
Although we have an active program
to train our independent manufacturers in, and monitor their compliance with,
our labor and other factory standards, any failure by those manufacturers to
comply with our standards or any other divergence in their labor or other
practices from those generally considered ethical in the United States and the
potential negative publicity relating to any of these events could materially
harm us and our reputation.
The extent of our foreign
operations and contract manufacturing may adversely affect our domestic
business.
Nearly all of our products are
manufactured outside of North America. The following may adversely affect
foreign operations:
- political instability in countries where contractors and suppliers are
located;
- imposition of regulations and quotas relating to imports;
- imposition of duties, taxes and other charges on imports;
- significant fluctuation of the value of the dollar against foreign
currencies;
- labor shortages in countries where contractors and suppliers are
located; and
- restrictions on the transfer of funds to or from foreign countries.
As a result of our foreign
operations, our domestic business is subject to the following risks:
- A reduction in available manufacturing capacity, resulting from the
closing of foreign factories that have experienced substantial declines in
orders;
- uncertainties of sourcing associated with an environment in which
general quota has been eliminated on apparel products pursuant to the World
Trade Organization Agreement;
- 24 -
- reduced manufacturing flexibility because of geographic distance between
us and our foreign manufacturers, increasing the risk that we may have to
mark down unsold inventory as a result of misjudging the market for a
foreign-made product;
- increases in manufacturing costs in the event of a decline in the value
of the United States dollar against major world currencies, particularly the
Chinese Yuan, and higher labor costs being experienced by our foreign
manufacturers in China; and
- violations by foreign contractors of labor and wage standards and
resulting adverse publicity.
Fluctuations in the price,
availability and quality of raw materials could cause delay and increase costs.
Fluctuations in the price,
availability and quality of the fabrics or other raw materials used by us in our
manufactured apparel and in the price of materials used to manufacture our
footwear and accessories could have a material adverse effect on our cost of
sales or our ability to meet our customers' demands. The prices for such fabrics
depend largely on the market prices for the raw materials used to produce them,
particularly cotton, leather and synthetics. The price and availability of such
raw materials may fluctuate significantly, depending on many factors, including
crop yields and weather patterns. In the future, we may not be able to pass all
or a portion of such higher raw materials prices on to our customers.
Difficulties in implementing
new computer systems and software could impact our ability to design, produce
and ship our products on a timely basis.
We continually improve and upgrade
our computer systems and software and are in the process of implementing the
SAP Apparel and Footwear Solution as our core operational and financial system.
The implementation of the SAP Apparel and Footwear Solution software, which
began at select locations in November 2006, is a key part of our ongoing efforts
to eliminate redundancies and enhance our overall cost structure and margin
performance. Difficulties migrating existing systems to new software could
impact our ability to design, produce and ship our products on a timely basis.
The loss or infringement of our
trademarks and other proprietary rights could have a material adverse effect on
us.
We believe that our trademarks and
other proprietary rights are important to our success and competitive position.
Accordingly, we devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection
of our trademarks on a worldwide basis. There can be no assurances that such
actions taken to establish and protect our trademarks and other proprietary
rights will be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to
prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products as violative of their
trademarks and proprietary rights. Moreover, there can be no assurances that
others will not assert rights in, or ownership of, our trademarks and other
proprietary rights or that we will be able to successfully resolve such
conflicts. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect
proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. The
loss of such trademarks and other proprietary rights, or the loss of the
exclusive use of such trademarks and other proprietary rights, could have a
material adverse effect on us. Any litigation regarding our trademarks could be
time-consuming and costly.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS
Not applicable.
- 25 -
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The general location, use and approximate size of our
principal properties are set forth below:
Location
|
Owned/Leased
|
Use
|
Approximate Area
in Square Feet (1)
|
Bristol, Pennsylvania |
leased |
Administrative and computer services |
172,600 |
New York, New York |
leased |
Administrative, executive and sales offices |
561,900 |
Vaughan, Canada |
leased |
Administrative offices and distribution warehouse |
125,000 |
Lawrenceburg, Tennessee |
owned |
Distribution
warehouses |
1,223,800 |
South Hill, Virginia |
leased |
Distribution warehouses |
823,040 |
El Paso, Texas |
leased |
Distribution warehouses |
952,000 |
White Plains, New York |
leased |
Administrative offices |
132,200 |
West Deptford, New Jersey |
leased |
Distribution warehouses |
988,400 |
East Providence, Rhode Island |
leased |
Distribution warehouses, product development,
administrative and computer services |
164,700 |
_________________
(1) Including mezzanine where applicable.
We sublease a 234,000 square foot
office building in White Plains, New York to an independent company.
We lease approximately 715,250
square feet of warehouse facilities in Goose Creek, South Carolina which are
currently not in service. We sublease 301,350 square feet of these facilities to
an independent company.
Our retail stores are leased
pursuant to long-term leases, typically five to seven years for apparel and
footwear outlet stores and ten years for footwear and accessories and apparel
specialty stores. Certain leases allow us to terminate our obligations after a
predetermined period (generally one to three years) in the event that a
particular location does not achieve specified sales volume, and some leases
have options to renew. Many leases include clauses that provide for contingent
payments based on sales volumes, and many leases contain escalation clauses for
increases in operating costs and real estate taxes.
We believe that our existing
facilities are well maintained, in good operating condition and that our
existing and planned facilities will be adequate for our operations for the
foreseeable future.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We have been named as a defendant
in various actions and proceedings arising from our ordinary business
activities. Although the amount of any liability that could arise with respect
to these actions cannot be accurately predicted, in our opinion, any such
liability will not have a material adverse financial effect on us.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not Applicable.
- 26 -
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Our executive officers are as follows:
Name |
Age |
Office
|
Wesley R. Card |
61 |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Sidney Kimmel |
81 |
Chairman |
Ira M. Dansky |
63 |
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary |
John
T. McClain |
47 |
Chief
Financial Officer |
Andrew
Cohen |
59 |
Chief
Executive Officer - Footwear, Accessories and Retail |
Christopher
R. Cade |
41 |
Executive
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller |
Mr. Card was named our President
and Chief Executive Officer on July 12, 2007. Mr. Card had been our Chief
Operating Officer since March 2002. He had also been appointed Chief Financial
Officer in March 2007, a position he previously held from 1990 to March 2006.
Mr. Kimmel founded the Jones
Apparel Division of W.R. Grace & Co. in 1970. Mr. Kimmel has served as our
Chairman since 1975 and as Chief Executive Officer from 1975 to May 2002.
Mr. Dansky has been our General
Counsel since 1996 and our Secretary since January 2001. He was elected an
Executive Vice President in March 2002.
Mr. McClain became our Chief
Financial Officer on July 16, 2007. Prior to joining us, Mr. McClain served as
Chief Accounting Officer of Avis Budget Group, Inc. (formerly Cendant
Corporation), a position he assumed in July 2006. From 1999 to July 2006, Mr.
McClain served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller for
Cendant Corporation.
Mr. Cohen was named Chief
Executive Officer - Wholesale Footwear and Accessories in April 2006 and also
assumed responsibility for Company-owned retail footwear and apparel in April
2007. He served as President - Wholesale Footwear and Accessories from January
2006 until April 2006. He was the Group President of the Energie and l.e.i.
Divisions from May 2004 to January 2006 and President of the Energie Division
from July 2001 until May 2004.
Mr. Cade was named Executive Vice
President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller on December 17, 2007. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Cade served as Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting
Officer and Controller of Realogy Corporation (formerly Cendant Corporation), a
position he assumed in August 2006. From June 2004 through July 2006, Mr. Cade
served as Vice President, Corporate Finance, of Cendant Corporation. Prior to
joining Cendant, he served as Director, Corporate Accounting and Reporting, of
Public Service Enterprise Group, where he was employed from October 2002 to June
2004.
- 27 -
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S
COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
First Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third Quarter
|
Fourth Quarter
|
Price range of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
High |
$18.06 |
$17.86 |
$22.12 |
$16.43 |
Low |
$12.10 |
$12.91 |
$12.25 |
$2.34 |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
High |
$35.54 |
$34.73 |
$28.72 |
$23.08 |
Low |
$30.22 |
$27.50 |
$16.73 |
$15.98 |
Dividends paid per share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
2007 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
Our common stock is traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "JNY." The above figures set forth, for
the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices per share of our common
stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape. The last
reported sale price per share of our common stock on February 13, 2009 was $3.44,
and on that date there were 538 holders of record of our common stock. However,
many shares are held in "street name;" therefore, the number of holders of
record may not represent the actual number of shareholders.
Annual CEO Certification
The Annual CEO Certification
required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company
Manual was submitted to the New York Stock Exchange on May 29, 2008.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any of our
common shares during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008.
Comparative Performance
The SEC requires us to present a
chart comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with
the cumulative total stockholder return of (i) a broad equity market index and
(ii) a published industry index or peer group. The following chart compares the
performance of our common stock with that of the S&P 500 Composite Index and the
S&P 500 Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods Index, assuming an investment of
$100 on December 31, 2003 in each of our common stock, the stocks comprising the
S&P 500 Composite Index and the stocks comprising the S&P 500 Apparel,
Accessories & Luxury Goods Index and the reinvestment of dividends.
- 28 -
- 29 -
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following financial
information is qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction
with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
contained elsewhere in this Report. The selected consolidated financial
information presented below is derived from our audited Consolidated Financial
Statements for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2008. We
completed our acquisitions of Maxwell on July 8, 2004 and Barneys on December
20, 2004 and, accordingly, the results of their operations are included in our
operating results from the respective dates of acquisition. On September 6,
2007, we sold Barneys. The results of operations of Barneys have been reported
as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
(All amounts in millions except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
3,562.6 |
|
$ |
3,793.3 |
|
$ |
4,014.8 |
|
$ |
4,473.3 |
|
$ |
4,573.2 |
|
|
Licensing income |
|
52.1 |
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
Service and other revenues |
|
1.7 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
3,616.4 |
|
|
3,848.5 |
|
|
4,087.0 |
|
|
4,532.2 |
|
|
4,630.3 |
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
2,440.2 |
|
|
2,609.1 |
|
|
2,674.2 |
|
|
2,950.4 |
|
|
2,933.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
1,176.2 |
|
|
1,239.4 |
|
|
1,412.8 |
|
|
1,581.8 |
|
|
1,696.4 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
1,069.2 |
|
|
1,100.4 |
|
|
1,096.3 |
|
|
1,128.3 |
|
|
1,170.9 |
|
|
Loss on sale of Polo Jeans
Company business |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Trademark impairments |
|
25.2 |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
813.2 |
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
441.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
(731.4 |
) |
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
(220.0 |
) |
|
453.5 |
|
|
525.3 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
7.5 |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Interest expense and financing costs |
|
49.1 |
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
Gain on sale of stock in Rubicon Retail
Limited |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Gain on sale of interest in
Australian joint venture |
|
0.8 |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
8.1 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
|
(772.9 |
) |
|
(58.5 |
) |
|
(245.1 |
) |
|
386.8 |
|
|
479.9 |
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
(1) |
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
(104.4 |
) |
|
(70.1 |
) |
|
134.0 |
|
|
180.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing
operations |
|
(766.3 |
) |
|
45.9 |
|
|
(175.0 |
) |
|
252.8 |
|
|
299.4 |
|
|
Income from
discontinued operations, net of tax (2) |
|
0.9 |
|
|
265.2 |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for
share-based payments, net of tax |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income |
$ |
(765.4 |
) |
$ |
311.1 |
|
$ |
(144.1 |
) |
$ |
274.3 |
|
$ |
301.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from
continuing operations |
$ |
(9.24 |
) |
$ |
0.46 |
|
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
$ |
2.15 |
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
0.01 |
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
(loss) earnings per share |
$ |
(9.23 |
) |
$ |
3.11 |
|
$ |
(1.30 |
) |
$ |
2.33 |
|
$ |
2.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from
continuing operations |
$ |
(9.24 |
) |
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
$ |
2.12 |
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
0.01 |
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
$ |
(9.23 |
) |
$ |
3.07 |
|
$ |
(1.30 |
) |
$ |
2.30 |
|
$ |
2.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
per share |
$ |
0.56 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
82.9 |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
118.0 |
|
|
123.6 |
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
82.9 |
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
119.2 |
|
|
126.5 |
|
- 30 -
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
$ |
693.6 |
|
$ |
898.5 |
|
$ |
984.2 |
|
$ |
447.9 |
|
$ |
612.3 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
2,427.5 |
|
|
3,236.6 |
|
|
3,801.1 |
|
|
4,577.8 |
|
|
4,571.4 |
|
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
253.1 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
357.3 |
|
|
203.2 |
|
|
Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations |
|
528.9 |
|
|
777.7 |
|
|
785.1 |
|
|
786.4 |
|
|
1,013.3 |
|
|
Stockholders' equity (3) |
|
1,182.2 |
|
|
1,996.8 |
|
|
2,211.6 |
|
|
2,666.4 |
|
|
2,653.9 |
|
(1) |
As a result of the capital
gain generated by the sale of Barneys, in 2007 we reversed a $107.7
million deferred tax valuation allowance previously created from capital
loss carryforwards that we had not expected to be able to utilize. The
reversal of the tax valuation allowance has been recorded in income from
continuing operations, as the creation of the deferred tax valuation
allowance was recorded in continuing operations in 2006 upon the sale of
our Polo Jeans Company business. |
(2) |
On September 6, 2007, we sold
Barneys. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, "Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the results of
operations of Barneys have been reported as discontinued operations for
all periods presented. The 2007 amount includes an after-tax gain of
$254.2 million from the sale. In 2008, we reached final settlement on
certain liabilities remaining from the sale, resulting in an additional
after-tax gain of $0.9 million. |
(3) |
The decreases from 2005 to
2008 are primarily the result of the impairments of goodwill and
indefinite-lived trademarks in 2006, 2007 and 2008. |
- 31 -
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides
information and analysis of our results of operations from 2006 through 2008,
and our liquidity and capital resources. The following discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein.
Executive Overview
We design, contract for the
manufacture of and market a broad range of women's collection sportswear, suits
and dresses, casual sportswear and jeanswear for women and children, and women's
footwear and accessories. We sell our products through a broad array of
distribution channels, including better specialty and department stores and mass
merchandisers, primarily in the United States and Canada. We also operate our
own network of retail and factory outlet stores and several e-commerce web
sites. In addition, we license the use of several of our brand names to select
manufacturers and distributors of women's and men's apparel and accessories
worldwide.
During 2008, the following
significant events took place:
- in February 2008, we announced that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. ("Wal-Mart")
would be the exclusive retailer of our l.e.i. brand for juniors, junior plus
and girls beginning with the 2008 back-to-school shopping season at Walmart
stores nationwide;
- in May 2008, we announced the sale of our remaining Mexican operations;
- in June 2008, we announced that we successfully completed amendments to
our $1 billion and $750 million five-year revolving credit facilities
(reducing the $1 billion facility commitment to $500 million), and in
December 2008, we announced we had terminated the $500 million facility and
further amended the $750 million facility (reducing the commitment to $600
million);
- in June 2008, we announced that we formed a joint venture with Royale
Etenia LLC ("Royale") to develop, market and license the New York-based
fashion brand Rachel Roy and that we also assumed the operating assets and
liabilities of Rachel Roy Fashions, Inc.;
- in June 2008, we announced that we acquired a minority interest in GRI
Group Limited, an international accessories and apparel brand management and
retail-distribution network;
- in June 2008, we announced the completion of our accelerated stock
repurchase ("ASR") program;
- in July 2008, we announced we had entered into an agreement with New
Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. ("New Balance") to license, create and
distribute a fashion-lifestyle footwear collection that brings together New
Balance's innovative performance and materials technology with Nine West's
fashion styling; and
- on August 5, 2008, Standard & Poor's removed our corporate credit and
senior unsecured debt ratings from credit watch and lowered the ratings to
BB from BB+. It further lowered the ratings to BB- on October 29, 2008 while
maintaining its previously-assigned negative outlook. On October 20, 2008,
Moody's lowered our corporate family and probability of default ratings to
Ba2 from Ba1 and assigned a ratings outlook of stable. As a result of the
amendments to our revolving credit facility expiring on May 16, 2010,
Standard & Poor's further downgraded our senior unsecured debt ratings from
BB- to B+ on January 6, 2009, and Moody's further downgraded our senior
unsecured debt ratings from Ba2 to Ba3 on January 8, 2009.
Trends
The current economic environment
has resulted in lower consumer confidence and lower retail sales. This trend may
lead to further reduced consumer spending, which could affect our net sales and
our future profitability. Therefore, we have taken aggressive cost reduction
actions to address the uncertainty posed by the current economic conditions and
to protect our future profitability. Cost reduction actions underway are
anticipated to result in annualized cash savings of approximately $33 million.
These actions include personnel reductions, elimination of certain unprofitable
divisions and a reduction in discretionary spending. In addition to cost
reduction actions, we have reduced our 2009 planned capital spending to
approximately $40 - $45 million from the $71.2 million expended in 2008.
- 32 -
Our Board of Directors has also approved a reduction in our quarterly cash
dividend from $0.14 per share to $0.05 per share.
We believe that several
significant trends are occurring in the women's apparel, footwear and
accessories industry. We believe that a trend exists among our major retail
accounts to concentrate their women's apparel, footwear and accessories buying
among a narrowing group of vendors and to differentiate their product offerings
through exclusivity of brands. We also believe that consumers in the United
States and Canada are shopping in multiple channels, including specialty shops
and national chains where value is perceived to be higher. We have responded to
these trends by enhancing the brand equity of our brands through our focus on
design, quality and value, and through strategic acquisitions which provide
significant diversification to the business by successfully adding new
distribution channels, labels and product lines. Through this diversification,
we have evolved into a multidimensional resource in apparel, footwear and
accessories and retail. We have leveraged the strength of our brands to increase
both the number of locations and amount of selling space in which our products
are offered and to introduce product extensions. We have also leveraged our
design, production and marketing capabilities to develop and provide proprietary
branded and private label products to major wholesale customers.
We also believe that consumers
will continue to increase their purchasing of apparel, footwear and accessories
through e-commerce web sites. During 2008, we upgraded our existing sites,
www.ninewest.com, www.easyspirit.com and www.bandolino.com, and launched
www.jny.com. We also plan to launch www.anneklein.com in early 2009. Through these web
sites, we market either footwear and accessories, apparel or a combination of these
products, primarily under their respective brand names. The selection of
products is substantially consistent with the product offerings in our
corresponding retail store concepts. Our e-commerce systems allow us to fulfill
customer orders from inventory at our retail store locations if the items are
not available at our distribution center.
On January 1, 2005, the World
Trade Organization's 148 member nations lifted all quotas on apparel and
textiles. As a result, all textiles and textile apparel manufactured in a member
nation and exported after January 1, 2005 are no longer subject to quota
restrictions. A special safeguard provision that had provided the U.S. with an
additional four years beyond January 1, 2005 to apply quotas on Chinese imports
of textiles expired on December 31, 2008. The lifting of quotas and expiration
of safeguard provisions allows retailers, apparel firms and others to import
unlimited quantities of apparel and textile items from China, India and other
low-cost countries, which could lead to lower production costs, allow us to
improve the quality of our products for a given cost, or allow us to concentrate
production in the most efficient markets. However, litigation and political activity have been initiated by interested parties
seeking to re-impose quotas. In addition, if the prices of the imported goods
can be shown to be less than those offered by domestic producers for the same
items, the U.S. International Trade Commission may recommend that anti-dumping
duties be imposed on those goods. As a result, we are unable to predict the
long-term effects of the lifting of quota restrictions and related events on our
results of operations.
Rachel Roy Joint Venture
On June 10, 2008, we formed a
joint venture with Royale to develop, market and license the New York-based
fashion brand Rachel Roy. Under the terms of the agreement, we own a 50%
interest in the joint venture, with the remaining interest owned by Royale. The
joint venture plans to develop the Rachel Roy brand through continued
global expansion of the wholesale business, introduction of new product
categories, and stand-alone retail stores in key U.S. and international
locations. Rachel Roy will continue to lead the design of the brand. We also
assumed the operations and the assets and liabilities of the existing designer
collection business formerly operated by Rachel Roy Fashions, Inc. under a
license with the new joint venture. These entities are consolidated by us and,
accordingly, the results of operations are reflected in our financial
statements. In connection with the acquisition, no material assets or
liabilities were recorded in this transaction.
- 33 -
Investment in GRI
On June 20, 2008, we acquired a
10% equity interest in GRI, an international accessories and apparel brand
management and retail-distribution network, for $20.2 million. GRI, which
(including its franchisees) operates over 800 points of sale in 12 Asian
countries, is the exclusive licensee of several of our brands in Asia, including Nine West, Anne Klein New York, AK Anne
Klein, Easy Spirit, Enzo Angiolini and Joan & David. GRI also
distributes other women's apparel, shoes and accessory brands.
Under the terms of our investment,
GRI will be entitled to receive a future cash payment from us of up to $10.0
million if GRI's net income for its fiscal year ending January 31, 2009 exceeds
a specified earnings target. Any additional payment will be recorded as an
additional investment in GRI but will not increase our 10% equity interest.
Based on projected results of GRI for the remainder of its fiscal year, we
currently do not anticipate making any additional payments. The results of GRI
are reported under the equity method of accounting.
Accelerated Share Repurchase Program
On September 6, 2007, we entered
into an ASR agreement with Goldman, Sachs & Co. ("Goldman") to repurchase $400
million of our outstanding common stock. Purchases under the ASR were subject to
collar provisions that established minimum and maximum numbers of shares based
generally on the volume-weighted average price of our common stock during the
term of the ASR program. Final settlement of the ASR program was scheduled for
no later than July 19, 2008 and could occur earlier at the option of Goldman or
later under certain circumstances. Through June 5, 2008, 17.9 million shares had
been delivered to us by Goldman under the terms of the ASR. On June 5, 2008,
Goldman informed us that it had concluded the ASR. As a result, we received a
final delivery of 3.2 million shares on June 10, 2008, bringing the aggregate
number of shares received under the ASR program to 21.1 million shares. No cash
was required to complete the final delivery of shares. The combined average
price for the shares delivered under the ASR was $19.00 per share.
Strategic Decisions Regarding Certain Moderate Apparel Brands
Our continued strategic
operational reviews and efforts to improve profitability and the continued trend
of our moderate and jeanswear customers towards differentiated product offerings
led us to make the strategic decision to exit some of our moderate apparel
product lines during 2007. As a result of this exit, we renamed our wholesale
moderate apparel segment as our wholesale jeanswear segment to better reflect
the products we produce in that segment. We believe that exiting these product
lines will strengthen our future operating results and allow us to focus
primarily on growth opportunities in our remaining wholesale product lines,
which have strong fundamentals and operate at higher margins. This decision did
not impact in any way our denim and junior division labels such as Gloria
Vanderbilt, l.e.i., Energie, GLO, Grane and others, which are also reported
in the wholesale jeanswear segment. The moderate product lines we exited have
not been classified as discontinued operations as they do not meet the criteria
for discontinued operations as set forth in SFAS No. 144. As a result of the
loss of these projected revenues, we recorded impairments for our Norton
McNaughton and Erika trademarks of $80.5 million in our licensing,
other and eliminations segment in 2007. In connection with this decision, we
closed our Goose Creek, South Carolina and Edison, New Jersey distribution
centers. See "Accrued Restructuring Costs" in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
We announced in February 2008 that
Wal-Mart would be the exclusive retailer of our l.e.i. brand for juniors,
junior plus and girls beginning with the 2008 back-to-school shopping season at
Wal-Mart stores nationwide.
Sale of Mexican Operations
On September 12, 2006, we
announced the closing of our Mexican operations related to the decision by Polo
to discontinue the Polo Jeans Company product line, which we produced for
Polo subsequent to the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business to Polo in
February 2006. At that time, we determined the estimated fair value of the
property, plant and equipment employed in Mexico was less than its carrying
- 34 -
value. As a result, we recorded an impairment loss of $8.6 million, which was
reported as cost of sales in the wholesale jeanswear segment in 2006. The
closing was substantially completed by the end of March 2007. On May 8, 2008, we
sold the Mexican operations for $5.9 million, resulting in a gain of $0.2
million.
Sale of Barneys
On September 6, 2007, we completed
the sale of Barneys to an affiliate of Istithmar PJSC. We received $937.4
million of cash (net of working capital adjustments) and paid an aggregate of
$54.6 million in cash for bonuses for key Barneys employees, compensation for
restricted stock held by certain employees of Barneys that was forfeited upon
the completion of the sale and other fees and costs related to the sale.
As a result of the capital gain
generated by the sale of Barneys, we reversed a $107.7 million deferred tax
valuation allowance previously created from capital loss carryforwards that we
had not expected to be able to utilize. The reversal of the tax valuation
allowance has been recorded in income from continuing operations in 2007.
In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 144, the results of operations of Barneys for the current and prior
periods have been reported as discontinued operations and the assets and
liabilities relating to Barneys have been reclassified as held for sale for all
prior periods in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Sale of Polo Jeans Company Business in 2006
In February 2006, we reached a
settlement of certain litigation that we had commenced in 2003 with Polo. In
connection with this settlement, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with
Polo and certain of its subsidiaries with respect to the sale to Polo of all
outstanding stock of Sun. Among other terms, we received gross proceeds of
$355.0 million in connection with the sale and the settlement. Sun's assets and
liabilities on the closing date primarily related to the Polo Jeans Company
business, which Sun operated under long-term license and design agreements
entered into with Polo in 1995.
We recorded a pre-tax loss of
approximately $145.1 million after allocating $356.7 million of goodwill to the
business sold and a pre-tax gain of $100.0 million related to the litigation
settlement. Approximately $3.7 million in state and local taxes were accrued
related to the litigation settlement, resulting in a combined after tax loss of
approximately $48.8 million. The combined loss created federal and state capital
loss carryforwards that we are using to partially offset the gain realized from
the sale of Barneys.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired and accounted for under
the purchase method. Accounting rules require that we test at least annually for
possible goodwill impairment. We perform our test in the fourth fiscal quarter
of each year using a discounted cash flow analysis that requires that certain
assumptions and estimates be made regarding industry economic factors and future
profitability. As a result of the 2006 impairment analysis, we determined that
the goodwill balance existing in our wholesale jeanswear segment was impaired as
a result of decreases in projected revenues and profitability with respect to
certain moderate apparel brands, as well as changes in business strategy with
respect to our Norton McNaughton brand. Accordingly, we recorded an
impairment charge of $441.2 million. As a result of the 2007 impairment
analysis, we determined that the remaining goodwill balance existing in our
wholesale jeanswear segment was impaired as a result of decreases in projected
revenues and profitability for certain brands. Accordingly, we recorded an
impairment charge of $78.0 million. As a result of the 2008 impairment analysis,
we determined that the goodwill balance existing in our wholesale footwear and
accessories segment was impaired as a result of decreases in projected revenues
and profitability for this segment. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment
charge of $813.2 million.
We also perform our annual
impairment test for trademarks during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year. As
a result of the 2006 impairment analysis, we recorded trademark impairment
charges of $50.2
- 35 -
million as a result of decreases in projected revenues for certain moderate
apparel, better apparel, footwear and costume jewelry brands. We also recorded
trademark impairment charges of $80.5 million in 2007 as a result of our
decision to discontinue or significantly reduce the scale of certain moderate
apparel brands. As a result of the 2007 and 2008 impairment analyses, we
recorded trademark impairment charges of $7.5 million and $25.2 million, respectively, as a
result of decreases in projected revenues for certain brands. All trademark
impairment charges are reported as selling, general and administrative expenses
in the licensing, other and eliminations segment.
Critical Accounting Policies
Several of our accounting policies
involve significant or complex judgements and uncertainties and require us to
make certain critical accounting estimates. We consider an accounting estimate
to be critical if it requires us to make assumptions about matters that were
highly uncertain at the time the estimate was made. The estimates with the
greatest potential effect on our results of operations and financial position
include the collectibility of accounts receivable, the recovery value of
obsolete or overstocked inventory and the fair values of both our goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives. Estimates related to accounts
receivable affect our wholesale better apparel, wholesale jeanswear, wholesale
footwear and accessories and retail segments. Estimates related to inventory and
goodwill affect our wholesale better apparel, wholesale jeanswear, wholesale
footwear and accessories and retail segments. Estimates related to intangible
assets with indefinite lives affect all of our segments.
For accounts receivable, we
estimate the net collectibility, considering both historical and anticipated
trends of trade discounts and co-op advertising deductions taken by our
customers, allowances we provide to our retail customers to flow goods through
the retail channels, and the possibility of non-collection due to the financial
position of our customers. For inventory, we estimate the amount of goods that
we will not be able to sell in the normal course of business and write down the
value of these goods to the recovery value expected to be realized through
off-price channels. Historically, actual results in these areas have not been
materially different than our estimates, and we do not anticipate that our
estimates and assumptions are likely to materially change in the future.
However, if we incorrectly anticipate trends or unexpected events occur, our
results of operations could be materially affected.
We test our goodwill and our
intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment on an annual basis
(during our fourth fiscal quarter) and between annual tests if an event occurs
or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of
an asset below its carrying value. We recorded goodwill impairments of $813.2
million, $78.0 million and $441.2 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
We recorded trademark impairments of $25.2 million, $88.0 million and $50.2
million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For more information, see
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
We test both our goodwill and our
trademarks for impairment by utilizing discounted cash flow models to estimate
their fair values. These cash flow models involve several assumptions. Changes
in our assumptions could materially impact our fair value estimates. Assumptions
critical to our fair value estimates are: (i) discount rates used to derive the
present value factors used in determining the fair value of the reporting units
and trademarks; (ii) royalty rates used in our trade mark valuations; (iii)
projected average revenue growth rates used in the reporting unit and trademark
models; and (iv) projected long-term growth rates used in the derivation of
terminal year values. These and other assumptions are impacted by economic
conditions and expectations of management and will change in the future based on
period-specific facts and circumstances. Based on our latest annual testing, the
following table shows the range of assumptions we used to derive our fair value
estimates and the hypothetical additional impairment charge for goodwill and
trademarks resulting from a one percentage point unfavorable change in each of
our fair value assumptions (amounts in millions).
- 36 -
|
Assumptions
|
Effect of one percentage point
unfavorable change in:
|
|
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Discount rates |
11.5% |
11.5% |
none |
$ 4.1 |
Royalty rates |
-- |
4.0% - 7.0% |
-- |
16.0 |
Weighted-average revenue growth rates |
2.8% |
7.5% |
none |
1.8 |
Long-term growth rates |
3.0% |
0% - 3.0% |
none |
2.9 |
The impairment charges resulting
from the goodwill impairment testing in 2008 were primarily the result of lower
projected revenues and profitability across various product lines in our
wholesale footwear and accessories segment and an increase in the discount rate.
The impairment charges resulting from the trademark impairment testing in 2008
were primarily from decreases in projected revenues for certain footwear and
costume jewelry product lines and an increase in the discount rate. We increased
our discount rate from the 9.5% used in 2007 to 11.5% in 2008, which reflects
the changes in our cost of capital and other factors.
At December 31, 2008, we had
$160.7 million of goodwill remaining, of which $40.1 million has been assigned
to the wholesale better apparel segment and $120.6 million has been assigned to
the retail segment. We also had $575.9 million of indefinite-lived trademarks
remaining. Should the economic conditions and trends (such as reduced consumer
spending) prevailing at December 31, 2008 continue to deteriorate throughout
2009 and beyond, the goodwill assigned to our retail segment and the fair values
of certain trademarks could become impaired.
Other than the assumptions used in
the impairment testing of our goodwill and trademarks, we have not made any
material changes to any of our critical accounting estimates in the last three
years. Our senior management has discussed the development and selection of our
critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors. In addition, there are other items within our financial statements
that require estimation, but are not deemed critical as defined above. Changes
in estimates used in these and other items could have a material impact on our
financial statements.
Results of Operations
Statements of Operations Stated in Dollars and as a Percentage of Total Revenues
(In millions)
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
3,562.6 |
|
98.5 |
%
|
$ |
3,793.3 |
|
98.6 |
% |
$ |
4,014.8 |
|
98.2 |
% |
Licensing income |
|
52.1 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
52.0 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
51.1 |
|
1.3 |
|
Service
and other revenues |
|
1.7 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
21.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
3,616.4 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
3,848.5 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
4,087.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
2,440.2 |
|
67.5 |
|
|
2,609.1 |
|
67.8 |
|
|
2,674.2 |
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
1,176.2 |
|
32.5 |
|
|
1,239.4 |
|
32.2 |
|
|
1,412.8 |
|
34.6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
1,069.2 |
|
29.6 |
|
|
1,100.4 |
|
28.6 |
|
|
1,096.3 |
|
26.8 |
|
Loss on sale of
Polo Jeans Company business |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
45.1 |
|
1.1 |
|
Trademark
impairments |
|
25.2 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
88.0 |
|
2.3 |
|
|
50.2 |
|
1.2 |
|
Goodwill impairments |
|
813.2 |
|
22.5 |
|
|
78.0 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
441.2 |
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
(731.4 |
) |
(20.2 |
) |
|
(27.0 |
) |
(0.7 |
) |
|
(220.0 |
) |
(5.4 |
) |
Interest income |
|
7.5 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
3.7 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
0.1 |
|
Interest expense and financing costs |
|
49.1 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
51.5 |
|
1.3 |
|
|
50.5 |
|
1.2 |
|
Gain
on sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
17.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
Gain
on sale of interest in Australian joint venture |
|
0.8 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
8.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
(0.7 |
) |
0.0 |
|
|
8.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing
operations before benefit for income taxes |
|
(772.9 |
) |
(21.4 |
) |
|
(58.5 |
) |
(1.5 |
)
|
|
(245.1 |
) |
(6.0 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
(6.6 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
|
(104.4 |
) |
(2.7 |
) |
|
(70.1 |
) |
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
(766.3 |
) |
(21.2 |
)
|
|
45.9 |
|
1.2 |
|
|
(175.0 |
) |
(4.3 |
) |
Income from
discontinued operations, including gain on sale of Barneys in 2007, net of tax |
|
0.9 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
265.2 |
|
6.9 |
|
|
29.0 |
|
0.7 |
|
Cumulative effect
of change in accounting for share-based payments, net of tax |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
1.9 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(765.4 |
) |
(21.2 |
%)
|
$ |
311.1 |
|
8.1 |
%
|
$ |
(144.1 |
) |
(3.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage totals may not agree due to rounding.
- 37 -
2008 Compared with 2007
Revenues. Total
revenues for 2008 were $3.6 billion, compared with $3.8 billion for 2007, a
decrease of 6.0%. Revenues by segment were as follows:
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
Percent
Change
|
|
Wholesale better apparel |
$ |
1,098.7 |
|
$ |
1,101.0 |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
(0.2% |
) |
Wholesale jeanswear |
|
796.5 |
|
|
985.0 |
|
|
(188.5 |
) |
(19.1% |
) |
Wholesale footwear and accessories |
|
938.3 |
|
|
955.8 |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
(1.8% |
) |
Retail |
|
730.2 |
|
|
753.7 |
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
(3.1% |
) |
Licensing and other |
|
52.7 |
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
(0.6% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
$ |
3,616.4 |
|
$ |
3,848.5 |
|
$ |
(232.1 |
) |
(6.0% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale better apparel revenues
did not materially change from 2007 to 2008. Shipments of our Jones New York
Signature product line increased, due to both increased customer orders
based on the performance of this brand at retail and initial shipments of our
new casual line of products, and shipments of our Joneswear and Anne
Klein product lines also increased, due to increased customer orders based
on the performance of these brands at retail. These increases were offset by
decreased shipments of our Jones New York, Nine West and
specialty market product lines, due to decreased orders from our customers based
on the performance of these brands at retail.
Wholesale jeanswear revenues
decreased $188.5 million. Lower shipments of our Rena Rowan, Nine & Co.,
Evan-Picone, Bandolino, Pappagallo and Erika moderate product lines,
which were discontinued or repositioned in the market in 2007, reduced sales by
approximately $238.8 million. Initial shipments of our l.e.i. brand for
juniors, junior plus and girls to Wal-Mart under an exclusive retailing
agreement and initial sales of the relaunched Erika, Pappagallo and
Evan-Picone product lines during 2008 were partially offset by planned
reductions of our GLO product line to focus on the l.e.i. brand
and lower shipments of our Energie product line, due to decreased orders
from our customers based on the performance of the brand at retail.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
revenues decreased $17.5 million. Lower sales of our Nine West and
Anne Klein footwear products, primarily related to planned lower sales to
value chain retailers and a shift in the market away from dress shoes towards
casual shoes, were partially offset by (i) increased shipments in our
international businesses due to continued expansion by our licensees
who purchase product from us; (ii) increased shipments of our Nine West
and Nine & Co. handbag product lines, due to increased orders from our
customers based on the performance of these brands at retail; and (iii) initial
shipments of our AK Anne Klein handbag line.
Retail revenues decreased $23.5
million, primarily due to a 4.3% decline in comparable store sales ($30.1
million) resulting from decreased consumer spending relating to current economic
conditions. Comparable stores are those that have been open for a full year, are
not scheduled to close in the current period and are not scheduled for an
expansion or downsize by more than 25% or relocation to a different street or
mall. A 2.9% decrease in comparable store sales for our footwear stores ($12.9
million) and a 12.4% decrease in comparable store sales for our apparel stores
($28.5 million) were partially offset by a 57.5% increase in our e-commerce
business ($11.3 million) and $18.1 million in sales from new store openings. We
began 2008 with 1,034 retail locations and had a net decrease of 17 locations
during the year to end the period with 1,017 locations.
Revenues for 2008 and 2007 include
$0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in the licensing and other segment
of service fees charged to Barneys under a short-term transition services
agreement entered into with Barneys at the time of the sale of Barneys. These
revenues were based on contractual monthly fees as set forth in the agreement.
The agreement ended in May 2008.
Revenues for 2007 include $1.2
million of service fees charged to Polo under a short-term transition service
agreement entered into with Polo at the time of the sale of the Polo Jeans
Company business. These
- 38 -
revenues were based on contractual monthly and per-unit fees as set forth in
the agreement. Of this amount, $1.0 million was recorded in the wholesale better
apparel segment and $0.2 million was recorded in the wholesale jeanswear
segment. The agreement ended in March 2007.
Gross Profit. The
gross profit margin increased to 32.5% in 2008, compared with 32.2% in 2007.
Wholesale better apparel gross
profit margins were 31.3% and 32.4% for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
decrease was due to higher levels of sales to off-price retailers in our suit
and dress product lines in 2008.
Wholesale jeanswear gross profit
margins were 21.9% and 18.6% for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase is
primarily due to the negative impact in the prior period of high levels of
vendor allowances to clear inventory for the lower-margin moderate brands we had
planned to exit or sell, the negative impact in the prior period of excess
production capacity in the Mexican operations that we sold in May 2008, and
lower levels of air shipments in 2008.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
gross profit margins were 25.2% and 28.2% for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
decrease was due to higher levels of sales to off-price retailers to liquidate
excess inventory, higher levels of vendor allowances to clear inventory at the
retail level, growth in our lower-margin international business and increased
production costs in China and other Pacific Rim countries in 2008.
Retail gross profit margins were
49.6% and 48.4% for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase was primarily the
result of lower levels of excess footwear inventory liquidation in the current
period, as the prior period included the liquidation of inventory related to the
closing of all of our Stein Mart retail locations.
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A")
expenses were $1.07 billion in 2008 and $1.10 billion in 2007.
Wholesale better apparel SG&A
expenses decreased $14.1 million, primarily from $8.8 million of cost savings
realized in 2008 by discontinuing the Anne Klein designer line, a $2.1 million
reduction in marketing expenses in 2008 and $5.9 million of expenses relating to
the closing of our Bristol, Pennsylvania warehouse which were recorded in 2007.
These decreases were partially offset by $1.5 million of incremental bad debt
expense related to the bankruptcy filing of Boscov's, Inc. ("Boscov's").
Wholesale jeanswear SG&A expenses
decreased $33.4 million, primarily from cost savings resulting from the exit
from some of our moderate apparel product lines during 2007, which were
partially offset by a $4.2 million increase in administrative support costs,
$1.9 million of advertising costs related to the launch of l.e.i. at
Wal-Mart and $6.8 million of incremental bad debt expense related to the
bankruptcy filings of Goody's Family Clothing, Inc. ("Goody's"), Mervyn's LLC
("Mervyn's"), Gottschalks Inc. ("Gottschalks") and Boscov's.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
SG&A expenses increased $20.1 million, primarily due to a $5.5 million increase
in advertising costs, a $5.2 million increase in administrative support costs, a
$4.0 million increase in salary, bonus and employee benefit costs (including
pension costs), a $2.8 million increase in severance costs, a $2.3 million
increase in sales and use taxes due to a tax audit settlement, a $1.1 million
increase in distribution costs and $1.0 million of incremental bad debt expense
related to the Goody's and Boscov's bankruptcy filings in 2008, offset by a $1.1
million reduction in consulting fees as compared with 2007.
Retail SG&A expenses increased
$8.2 million, primarily due to a $3.9 million increase in administrative support
costs, a $3.8 million increase in depreciation expense and other occupancy
costs, a $2.9 million increase in Canadian retail store operating costs and a
$1.5 million write-off of computer software in 2008, partially offset by a $3.9
million reduction in professional fees, severance costs and employee benefits as
compared with 2007.
- 39 -
SG&A expenses for the licensing,
other and eliminations segment decreased $12.4 million, primarily due to amounts
recorded in 2007 relating to the termination of two former executive officers.
Impairment Losses.
As a result of our annual goodwill impairment analyses, we recorded goodwill
impairments of $813.2 million in 2008 as a result of decreases in projected
revenues and profitability for certain footwear and accessory brands and $78.0
million in 2007 as a result of decreases in projected revenues and profitability
for certain moderate apparel brands. As a result of our annual trademark
impairment analyses, we recorded trademark impairment charges of $25.2 million
and $7.5 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively, as a result of decreases in
projected revenues for certain brands. We also recorded trademark impairment
charges of $80.5 million in 2007 as a result of our decision to discontinue or
significantly reduce the scale of certain brands. For more information, see
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Operating Loss. The
resulting operating loss from continuing operations for 2008 was $731.4 million,
compared with $27.0 million for 2007, due to the factors described above.
Net Interest Expense.
Net interest expense from continuing operations was $41.6 million in 2008,
compared with $47.8 million in 2007. The decrease was primarily the result of no
outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities and higher interest income
from higher cash balances during 2008.
Income Taxes. The
effective income tax rate benefit on continuing operations was 0.8% and 178.4%
for 2007 and 2006, respectively. Excluding the effects of the goodwill and
trademark impairments, the effective income tax rate on continuing operations
was 33.2% for 2008. Excluding the effects of the reversal of deferred tax
valuation allowances related to the sale of Barneys ($107.7 million) and the
goodwill impairment, the effective tax rate on continuing operations was 17.0%
for 2007. The increase is due primarily to a lesser impact of the foreign income
tax differential relative to pre-tax income in the current period than in the
prior period.
Discontinued Operations.
Income from discontinued operations for 2008 includes a $0.9 million adjustment
to the after-tax gain on the sale of Barneys. Income from discontinued
operations for 2007 includes a $254.2 million after-tax gain on the sale of
Barneys and $11.0 million of net income from the operation of Barneys prior to
the sale (see "Discontinued Operations" in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements).
Net (Loss) Income and (Loss)
Income Per Share. Net loss was $(765.4) million in 2008, compared with
net income of $311.1 million in 2007, which included the $254.2 million gain on
the sale of Barneys. Diluted loss per share for 2008 was $(9.23), compared with
earnings per share of $3.07 for 2007, on 18.2% fewer shares outstanding.
2007 Compared with 2006
Revenues. Total
revenues for 2007 were $3.8 billion compared with $4.1 billion for 2006, a
decrease of 5.8%. Revenues by segment were as follows:
(In millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease
|
)
|
Percent
Change
|
|
Wholesale better apparel |
$ |
1,101.0 |
|
$ |
1,127.4 |
|
$ |
(26.4 |
) |
(2.3% |
) |
Wholesale jeanswear |
|
985.0 |
|
|
1,142.0 |
|
|
(157.0 |
) |
(13.7% |
) |
Wholesale footwear and accessories |
|
955.8 |
|
|
941.1 |
|
|
14.7 |
|
1.6% |
|
Retail |
|
753.7 |
|
|
822.7 |
|
|
(69.0 |
) |
(8.4% |
) |
Licensing and other |
|
53.0 |
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
(1.5% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
$ |
3,848.5 |
|
$ |
4,087.0 |
|
$ |
(238.5 |
) |
(5.8% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale better apparel revenues
decreased $26.4 million, primarily due to the effects of the sale of the Polo
Jeans Company business, which contributed $24.6 million in net sales in
2006. Shipments of our Jones New York Signature and Evan-Picone
product lines increased due to orders from our customers based on the
performance of these brands at retail. These increases were offset by decreased
shipments of our
- 40 -
Jones New York Suit product line due to decreased orders
from our customers based on the performance of this brands at retail and
decreased shipments of our Jones New York, Anne Klein and Jones New
York Sport product lines due to decreased orders from our customers driven by the
overall challenging retail environment.
Wholesale jeanswear revenues
decreased $157.0 million, primarily due to decreased shipments and higher
markdown allowances to clear inventory in the moderate brands we are exiting or
significantly reducing (including the Norton McNaughton, Bandolino, Nine &
Co. and Rena Rowan product lines, decreased shipments of our denim
product lines due to decreased orders from our customers driven by the overall
challenging retail environment that developed during the fourth quarter of 2007
and the discontinuance by our wholesale customers of their exclusive W,
Joneswear Jeans, C.L.O.T.H.E.S., Latina and Duckhead product lines.
These decreases were partially offset by increased shipments of our Energie
product line due to increased orders from our customers based on the performance
of this brand at retail.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
revenues increased $14.7 million, primarily due to (1) increased shipping in our
international business due to increased orders from our existing customers and
the addition of new territories, (2) increased shipments of our Nine West
and Nine & Co. handbag products due to higher customer orders from strong
product performance at retail, and (3) the launch of our Anne Klein New York,
Joan & David, Boutique 9 and l.e.i. footwear product lines. These
increases were partially offset by reductions in our Nine West and
certain other footwear product lines due to retail consolidations and the timing
of shipments to certain retailers and lower levels of sales to off-price
retailers.
Retail revenues decreased $69.0
million, primarily due to the effect of the closing of our leased Stein Mart
locations ($51.7 million), a 7.9% decline in footwear comparable store sales
($37.9 million) and a 3.6% decline in apparel comparable store sales ($8.1
million), offset by $29.3 million from new store openings. Excluding Barneys, we
began 2007 with 1,100 retail locations and had a net decrease of 66 locations
(primarily the Stein Mart locations) during the period to end the period with
1,034 locations.
Revenues for 2007 also include
$1.0 million in the licensing and other segment of service fees charged to
Barneys under a short-term transition services agreement entered into with
Barneys at the time of the sale. These revenues are based on contractual monthly
fees as set forth in the agreement.
Revenues for 2007 and 2006 also
include $1.2 million and $17.4 million, respectively, of service fees charged to
Polo under a short-term transition service agreement entered into with Polo at
the time of the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business. These revenues
were based on contractual monthly and per-unit fees as set forth in the
agreement. Of the 2007 amount, $1.0 million was recorded in the wholesale better
apparel segment and $0.2 million was recorded in the wholesale jeanswear
segment. Of the 2006 amount, $11.7 million was recorded in the wholesale better
apparel segment, $3.1 million was recorded in the wholesale jeanswear segment
and $2.6 million was recorded in the licensing and other segment. The agreement
ended in March 2007.
Gross Profit. The
gross profit margin was 32.2% in 2007 and 34.6% in 2006.
Wholesale better apparel gross
profit margins were 32.4% and 36.5% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
decrease was due to reduced sales of higher-margin Polo Jeans Company
products as a result of the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business,
higher levels of sales to off-price retailers and higher levels of markdowns to
assist our customers with the overall challenging retail environment.
Wholesale jeanswear gross profit
margins were 18.6% and 21.2% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease was a
result of higher levels of markdowns to clear excess inventory and to assist our
customers with the overall challenging retail environment that developed during
the fourth quarter of 2007, as well as higher levels of sales to off-price
retailers, higher production costs and higher levels of air freight.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
gross profit margins were 28.2% and 28.6% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
decrease was a result of a higher level of markdowns to clear excess inventory
and higher net sales in our lower-margin international business in 2007, offset
by the launch of our higher-margin AK Anne Klein jewelry line in 2007,
and by markdowns related to the discontinuance of the
- 41 -
licensed Tommy Hilfiger
jewelry line and writedowns of excess inventory in our direct selling jewelry
and accessory business in 2006.
Retail gross profit margins were
48.4% and 51.4% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease was the result of
a higher level of promotional activity in our footwear and accessories stores to
liquidate excess inventory in 2007, partially offset by the liquidation of
inventory related to the closing of our Stein Mart locations in 2006.
SG&A Expenses. SG&A
expenses were approximately $1.1 billion in both 2007 and 2006.
Wholesale better apparel SG&A
expenses decreased $40.0 million from 2006 to 2007, primarily from a $26.9
million reduction in employee salary and benefit costs resulting from headcount
reductions and a $19.1 million decrease in advertising costs, partially offset
by a $6.8 million increase in administrative support costs. SG&A expenses for
2006 included $4.3 million related to the closing of the Secaucus warehouse.
Wholesale jeanswear SG&A expenses
increased $18.6 million, primarily from $10.3 million of costs related to the
exit of certain brands and the closing of warehouse facilities, a $5.3 million
increase in administrative support costs and a $1.1 million increase in
advertising costs. SG&A expenses in 2006 included $2.3 million related to the
closing of our Mexican production facilities.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
SG&A expenses decreased $6.9 million. The decrease was primarily due to $10.0
million recorded in 2006 related to the termination of a former executive
officer and the settlement of litigation concerning a license agreement,
partially offset by a $4.9 million increase in administrative support costs in
2007.
Retail SG&A expenses increased
$22.5 million, primarily from a $24.4 million increase in store occupancy and
employee costs (which includes $18.0 million resulting from the opening of new
retail stores), a $5.8 million increase in administrative support costs, $5.6
million additional depreciation from store remodels and $4.0 million of
additional consulting, legal settlement and design costs in 2007. These
increases were partially offset by $19.7 million of cost savings resulting from
the shutdown of our Stein Mart locations in January 2007. SG&A expenses in 2006
included $2.6 million related to the termination of a former executive officer.
SG&A expenses for the licensing,
other and eliminations segment increased $9.9 million, primarily from amounts
related to the termination of two former executive officers in 2007.
Impairment Losses and Other
Items. As a result of our annual goodwill impairment analyses, we
recorded goodwill impairments of $78.0 and $441.2 million in 2007 and 2006,
respectively, as a result of decreases in projected revenues and profitability
for certain moderate apparel brands. As a result of our annual trademark
impairment analyses, we recorded trademark impairment charges of $7.5 and $50.2
million in 2007 and 2006, respectively, as a result of decreases in projected
revenues for certain moderate apparel brands. We also recorded trademark
impairment charges of $80.5 million in 2007 as a result of our decision to
discontinue or significantly reduce the scale of certain brands. For more
information, see "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" in Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
During 2007, we sold our interest
in our Australian joint venture for $20.7 million, which resulted in a gain of
$8.2 million (see "Joint Ventures" in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements). During 2006, we recorded a $17.4 million gain (net of associated
costs) upon the sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited (see "Gain on Sale of
Stock in Rubicon Retail Limited" in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Operating Loss. The
resulting operating loss from continuing operations for 2007 was $27.0 million
compared with $220.0 million for 2006, due to the factors described above and
the loss of the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business in 2006.
Net Interest Expense.
Net interest expense was $47.8 million in 2007 compared with $47.0 million in
2006.
- 42 -
Income Taxes. The
effective income tax rate benefit on continuing operations was 178.4% and 28.5%
for 2007 and 2006, respectively. Excluding the effects of the reversal of the
deferred tax valuation allowance related to the sale of Barneys ($107.7 million)
and the goodwill impairment, the effective tax rate on continuing operations was
17.0% for 2007. Without the effects of the Polo Jeans Company sale, the goodwill
impairment, the litigation settlement and the gain on the sale of stock in
Rubicon Retail Limited, the effective tax rate on continuing operations was
34.0% for 2006. The change from 2006 to 2007 was primarily driven by a greater
impact of the foreign income tax differential relative to pre-tax income in 2007
than in 2006.
Discontinued Operations.
Income from discontinued operations for 2007 includes a $254.2 million after-tax
gain on the sale of Barneys and $11.0 million of net income from the operation
of Barneys prior to the sale (see "Discontinued Operations" in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements), compared to $29.0 million of net income from
the operation of Barneys in 2006. The decrease in net income from the operation
of Barneys is primarily due to the results of Barneys being included in the
current year only through September 5, 2007.
Net Income (Loss) and
Earnings (Loss) Per Share. Net income was $311.1 million in 2007
compared with a net loss of $144.1 million in 2006. Diluted earnings per share
for 2007 was $3.07 compared with a loss per share of $(1.30) for 2006, on 8.4%
fewer shares outstanding.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital requirements
have been for working capital needs, capital expenditures, dividend payments,
acquisition funding and repurchases of our common stock on the open market. We
have historically relied on internally generated funds, trade credit, bank
borrowings and the issuance of notes to finance our operations and expansion. As
of December 31, 2008, total cash and cash equivalents were $338.3 million, an
increase of $35.5 million from the $302.8 million reported as of December 31,
2007.
We currently fund our operations
primarily through cash generated by operating activities, and rely on our
revolving credit facility for the issuance of trade letters of credit for the
purchases of inventory and for cash borrowings as needed. Our $250.0 million
4.250% Senior Notes mature in November 2009. We currently intend to repay these
notes from available cash upon their maturity. We do not currently believe that
we will need to borrow cash under our revolving credit facility.
Cash flows from operating
activities of continuing operations provided $175.5 million, $119.5 million and
$386.2 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Net cash provided by operating
activities increased $56.0 million from 2007 to 2008, primarily from the tax
effects of the Barneys sale in 2007 and federal and state tax refunds received
during 2008, offset by lower income from continuing operations in 2008 before
non-cash impairment charges. The primary changes in components of working
capital were to accounts receivable and accounts payable. The change in accounts
receivable was primarily the result of an increase in receivables from our
international and jeanswear businesses due to increased sales and the timing of
shipments during 2008. The change in accounts payable was primarily the result
of the timing of inventory payments and the effects of the sale of the Polo
Jeans Company business in 2007.
The $266.7 million decrease in net
cash provided by operating activities from 2006 to 2007 was primarily the result
of changes in working capital. Income taxes payable decreased primarily as a
result of the tax effects of the Barneys sale. Accounts receivable experienced a
smaller decrease in 2007 than in 2006 and accounts payable decreased in 2007
compared to an increase in 2006 primarily due to the effects from the sale of
the Polo Jeans Company business and the timing of inventory payments.
Cash flows from investing
activities of continuing operations used $84.4 million and provided $758.0
million and $258.8 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash used
in investing activities in 2008 funded capital expenditures, largely in our
retail segment, and the acquisition of an interest in GRI. In 2007 and 2006, net
cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to net cash received
from the sale of Barneys in 2007 and net cash received from the sale of the
Polo Jeans Company business in 2006.
- 43 -
Capital expenditures, which amounted to $71.2 million in 2008, are expected
to be approximately $40 - $45 million for 2009, primarily for retail store
remodeling and computer systems. Although many of the anticipated expenditures
for 2009 are discretionary, we believe they are necessary to maintain consistent
operating levels. We expect to fund the expenditures from cash generated by
operations.
Cash flows from financing
activities of continuing operations used $51.4 million in 2008, primarily for
the payment of dividends to our common shareholders.
Cash flows from financing
activities of continuing operations used $666.4 million in 2007, primarily to
repurchase our common stock and repay $100.0 million of net borrowings under our
Senior Credit Facilities.
Cash flows from financing
activities of continuing operations used $608.6 million in 2006, primarily to
redeem at maturity our outstanding 7.875% Senior Notes due 2005 at par on June
15, 2006 (for a total payment of $225.0 million), repurchase our common stock
and pay dividends to our common shareholders and repay $29.5 million of net
borrowings under our Senior Credit Facilities.
We repurchased no common stock
during 2008 and repurchased $496.9 million and $306.2 million of our common
stock during 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, $304.1
million of Board authorized repurchases was still available. We may make
additional share repurchases in the future depending on, among other things,
market conditions and our financial condition. On June 10, 2008, we received a
final delivery of 3.2 million shares upon the conclusion of the ASR program. No
cash was required to complete the final delivery of shares. We also received
approximately $1.0 million from Goldman as the final settlement of the ASR
program, which has been recorded as a reduction of the cost of the shares
acquired under the ASR. The combined average price for the shares delivered
under the ASR was $19.00 per share.
Our Board of Directors has
authorized our common stock repurchases as a tax-effective means to enhance
shareholder value and distribute cash to shareholders and, to a lesser extent,
to offset the impact of dilution resulting from the issuance of employee stock
options and shares of restricted stock. In authorizing future share repurchase
programs, our Board of Directors gives careful consideration to both our
projected cash flows and our existing capital resources.
Proceeds from the issuance of
common stock to our employees exercising stock options amounted to $0.1 million,
$11.1 million and $32.4 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Prior to June 6, 2008, we had
revolving credit agreements with several lending institutions to borrow an
aggregate principal amount of up to $1.75 billion. These agreements, which
consisted of a $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility expiring in June
2009 and a $750.0 million five-year revolving credit facility expiring in May
2010, could be used for letters of credit or cash borrowings. On June 6, 2008,
we amended these facilities. The terms and conditions of the credit facilities
remained substantially unchanged, except for modification of the pricing
provisions and certain covenants and reduction of the aggregate commitment under
the $1.0 billion facility to $500.0 million. On December 24, 2008, we announced
that, effective as of December 31, 2008, we terminated our $500 million
revolving credit facility that was scheduled to expire on June 15, 2009, and
that, effective as of January 5, 2009, we further amended our $750 million
revolving credit facility which expires on May 16, 2010 to reduce the aggregate
commitment to $600 million, increase the fees and interest rates, modify certain
covenants and provide collateral for borrowings. Otherwise, the terms and
conditions of the credit facility expiring on May 16, 2010 remain substantially
unchanged.
Up to $450 million of the amended
facility expiring on May 16, 2010 is available for the issuance of trade and
standby letters of credit, and cash borrowings are limited to the lesser of (a)
$400 million less amounts owed to the lending institutions or their
administrative agent under hedging agreements, treasury management services
agreements, open account agreements, letters of credit (other than those issued
under the facility) and other funded loans (the "Additional Secured Agreements")
and (b) the maximum amount of obligations permitted to be secured pursuant to
the Indenture dated November 22, 2004 (relating to our outstanding Senior Notes)
without any requirement to equally and ratably secure
- 44 -
such Senior Notes. Borrowings under the amended revolving credit facility may
be used to refinance existing indebtedness, for working capital needs and for
other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, subject to certain
limitations. Borrowings under the amended revolving credit facility and
obligations under the Additional Secured Agreements are secured by inventory and
receivables of Jones USA and certain of its affiliates, as well as the proceeds
of such inventory and receivables, but only to the extent that the grant of that
security would not require the Senior Notes issued under the Indenture to be
equally and ratably secured by that collateral.
The amended revolving credit
agreement requires us to satisfy a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio, a maximum
Covenant Debt to EBITDA Ratio and a minimum Asset Coverage Ratio (each as
defined in the amended facility expiring on May 16, 2010), and contains
covenants limiting our ability to (1) incur debt and guaranty obligations, (2)
incur liens, (3) make loans, advances, investments and acquisitions, (4) merge
or liquidate, (5) sell or transfer assets, (6) pay dividends, repurchase shares,
or make distributions to stockholders, (7) engage in transactions with
affiliates and (8) make capital expenditures above certain dollar thresholds. At
December 31, 2008, we are in compliance with all covenants under the facility
expiring on May 16, 2010 existing at that time and with all covenants in the
amended agreement that took effect on January 5, 2009. We do not anticipate any
breach of the covenants in the foreseeable future. However, any such breach,
should it occur, would have a material adverse impact to our liquidity due both
to restrictions on our ability to issue letters of credit under the revolving
credit facility for inventory purchases and to the cross-default provisions
relating to our outstanding Senior Notes.
At December 31, 2008, $175.8
million of letters of credit and no cash borrowings were outstanding under the
revolving credit facility expiring on May 16, 2010. The estimated maximum
amount of cash borrowings that would be available to us on that date under the
amended agreement that took effect on January 5, 2009 was $400.0
million. We believe this unused availability will be sufficient for our cash
borrowing needs for the foreseeable future.
At December 31, 2008, we also had
uncommitted unsecured lines of credit available for up to $51.5 million of
letters of credit, under which an aggregate of $45.8 million was outstanding. On
January 5, 2009, $50.0 million of these lines of credit were terminated and the
outstanding letters of credit were transferred to our amended revolving credit
facility. At December 31, 2008, we also had a C$10.0 million unsecured line of
credit in Canada, under which C$0.2 million of letters of credit were
outstanding.
On August 5, 2008, Standard &
Poor's removed our corporate credit and senior unsecured debt ratings from
credit watch and lowered the ratings to BB from BB+. It further lowered the
ratings to BB- on October 29, 2008 while maintaining its previously-assigned
negative outlook. On October 20, 2008, Moody's lowered our corporate family and
probability of default ratings to Ba2 from Ba1 and assigned a ratings outlook of
stable. As a result of the amendments to our revolving credit facility expiring
on May 16, 2010, Standard & Poor's further downgraded our senior unsecured debt
ratings from BB- to B+ on January 6, 2009 and Moody's further downgraded our
senior unsecured debt ratings from Ba2 to Ba3 on January 8, 2009. Under the
amended revolving credit facility, our fees and interest rates are no longer
affected by our credit rating, so further changes to our ratings will not
increase our borrowing costs. However, any future downgrades could affect our
ability to obtain additional funding sources.
We recorded net pension and
postretirement losses of $9.3 million in 2008 to other comprehensive income
resulting primarily from the downturn in the financial markets, which generated
lower than expected returns on our plan assets. We recorded net pension and
postretirement liability gains of $4.5 million to other comprehensive income in
2007 resulting primarily from the amortization of actuarial gains. We recorded
net pension and postretirement losses of $1.8 million in 2006 to other
comprehensive income resulting primarily from the amortization of actuarial
losses and lower than expected returns on our plan assets. Our pension and
postretirement plans are currently underfunded by a total of $18.1 million. As
the benefits under our defined benefit pension plans are frozen with respect to
service credits, the effects on future pension expense are not anticipated to be
material to our results of operations or to our liquidity.
- 45 -
On January 22, 2009, our Board of
Directors announced that the quarterly dividend would be reduced from $0.14 per
share to $0.05 per share beginning in 2009. This reduction is intended to
conserve cash in the current increasingly uncertain economic climate and return
our dividend yield to more appropriate levels. On February 11, 2009, we
announced that the Board of Directors had declared a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.05 per share to all common stockholders of record as of February 27, 2009 for
payment on March 13, 2009.
Economic Outlook
The current economic environment has
resulted in lower consumer confidence and lower retail sales. This trend may
lead to further reduced consumer spending which could affect our net sales and
our future profitability. Additionally, rising costs combined with reduced
consumer spending may reduce our gross profit margins and could affect our
compliance with our debt covenants. A violation of our covenants could restrict
or prohibit access to our credit facilities. Should restrictions on our credit
facilities and these factors occur, they could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Goody's, Mervyn's and Boscov's
filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code on June 9, 2008, July 29, 2008 and August 4, 2008,
respectively. On January 13, 2009, Goody's filed a second voluntary petition for
reorganization under Chapter 11 and announced it would liquidate. On January 14,
2009, Gottschalk's filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter
11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As a result, we incrementally increased
our provision for doubtful accounts by $9.3 million during 2008. Due to the
current and expected future economic conditions in the United States, we may
experience increased risk related to the collectibility of our accounts
receivable, and we may increase our provision for doubtful accounts in the
future should other of our wholesale customers experience significant financial
difficulties. If such conditions lead to defaults that are individually or
cumulatively significant, we could experience a material adverse impact to our
financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity.
The economic turmoil that has
arisen in the credit markets and the negative effects of the economic
environment on our business may negatively impact our ability to borrow funds in
the future. Our $600.0 million amended senior credit facility expires in May
2010. Under current conditions in the credit markets, there is no assurance that
we will be able to replace or refinance this source of funds. However, we
believe that available cash and cash equivalents, funds generated by operations,
the $600.0 million amended senior credit facility and our other lines of credit
will provide the financial resources sufficient to meet our foreseeable working
capital, dividend, capital expenditure and stock repurchase requirements and
fund our contractual obligations and our contingent liabilities and commitments.
Although there can be no assurance because of these challenging times for
financial institutions, we believe that the participating banks will be willing
and able to loan funds to us in accordance with their legal obligations under
the $600.0 million amended senior credit facility.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance
sheet arrangements within the meaning of SEC Regulation S-K Item 303(a)(4).
Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
The following is a summary of our
significant contractual obligations for the periods indicated that existed as of
December 31, 2008, and, except for purchase obligations and other long-term
liabilities, is based on information appearing in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements (amounts in millions).
- 46 -
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
1 year
|
|
|
1 - 3
years
|
|
|
3 - 5
years
|
|
|
More than
5 years
|
Long-term debt |
$ |
750.0 |
|
$ |
250.0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
500.0 |
Interest on long-term debt |
|
480.8 |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
330.8 |
Capital lease
obligations |
|
48.9 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
28.5 |
Operating lease obligations
(1) |
|
827.1 |
|
|
133.1 |
|
|
245.9 |
|
|
181.3 |
|
|
266.8 |
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
705.1 |
|
|
674.3 |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
- |
Minimum royalty payments
(3) |
|
4.1 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Capital expenditure
commitments |
|
7.9 |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Deferred compensation |
|
6.4 |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Other long-term liabilities
(4) |
|
83.7 |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
(5) |
$ |
2,914.0 |
|
$ |
1,120.7 |
|
$ |
346.4 |
|
$ |
269.9 |
|
$ |
1,177.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Future rental commitments for
leases have not been reduced by minimum non-cancelable sublease rentals
aggregating $26.7 million. |
(2) |
Includes outstanding letters
of credit of $221.8 million, which primarily represent inventory
purchase commitments which typically mature in two to six months. |
(3) |
Under exclusive licenses to
manufacture certain items under trademarks not owned by us pursuant to
various license agreements, we are obligated to pay the licensors a
percentage of our net sales of these licensed products, subject to
minimum scheduled royalty and advertising payments. |
(4) |
Consists primarily of deferred
rent and pension liabilities. Pension liabilities, which total $13.9
million, are reported under the more than five year column as we cannot
make reasonably reliable estimates of the timing and amounts to be paid.
We plan to contribute between $3.9 million and $7.6 million to our
defined benefit plans in 2009. |
(5) |
Excludes $14.1 million of
uncertain tax positions, for which we cannot make reasonably reliable
estimates of the timing and amounts to be paid. |
New Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141(R)"), which
requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed,
and any noncontrolling interest of an acquiree at the acquisition date, measured
at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R)
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is prohibited. The adoption of SFAS
No. 141(R) is not expected to have a material impact on our results of
operations or our financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,"
which requires (1) ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent to be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the
consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from
the parent's equity; (2) the amount of consolidated net income attributable to
the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and
presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income; and (3) changes
in a parent's ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling
financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently as equity
transactions. SFAS No. 160 applies prospectively to business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is
prohibited. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have a material
impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities -
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133," which changes the disclosure
requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial
- 47 -
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities," which classifies
unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) as participating
securities and requires them to be included in the computation of earnings per
share pursuant to the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per
Share." This Staff Position is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
years. All prior-period earnings per share data presented are to be adjusted
retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings,
and selected financial data). The adoption of this Staff Position will require
us to allocate a portion of net income to these participating securities. Under
the guidelines of this Staff Position, our basic (loss) earnings per share for
2006, 2007 and 2008 would be $(1.29), $3.07 and $(9.02), respectively, and our
diluted (loss) earnings per share for 2006, 2007 and 2008 would be $(1.29),
$3.03 and $(9.02), respectively.
- 48 -
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
We are exposed to the impact of
interest rate changes, foreign currency fluctuations, and changes in the market
value of our fixed rate long-term debt. We manage this exposure through regular
operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use
of derivative financial instruments. Our policy allows the use of derivative
financial instruments for identifiable market risk exposures, including interest
rate and foreign currency fluctuations. We do not enter into derivative
financial contracts for trading or other speculative purposes. The following
quantitative disclosures were derived using quoted market prices, yields and
theoretical pricing models obtained through independent pricing sources for the
same or similar types of financial instruments, taking into consideration the
underlying terms, such as the coupon rate, term to maturity and imbedded call
options. Certain items such as lease contracts, insurance contracts, and
obligations for pension and other post-retirement benefits were not included in
the analysis. For further information see "Derivatives" and "Financial
Instruments" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Rates
Our primary interest rate
exposures relate to the fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt and interest
expense related to our revolving credit facility.
At December 31, 2008, the fair
value of our fixed rate debt was $462.2 million. On that date, the potential
decrease in fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt instruments resulting
from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in interest rates was approximately $42.0
million.
Our primary interest rate
exposures on variable rate credit facilities are with respect to United States
and Canadian short-term rates. Cash borrowings under these facilities bear
interest at rates that vary with changes in prevailing market rates. At December
31, 2008, we had approximately $760.0 million in variable rate credit
facilities, under which no cash borrowings were outstanding. This amount was
reduced by $150.0 million on January 5, 2009.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
We are exposed to market risk
related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our products have
historically been purchased from foreign manufacturers in pre-set United States
dollar prices. To date, we generally have not been materially adversely affected
by fluctuations in exchange rates. We also have assets and liabilities
denominated in certain foreign currencies.
At December 31, 2008, we had
outstanding foreign exchange contracts to exchange Canadian Dollars for a total
notional value of US $10.5 million at a weighted-average exchange rate of 1.2026
maturing through May 2009. The fair value of these contracts at December 31,
2008 was a $0.1 million unrealized gain. We believe that these financial
instruments should not subject us to undue risk due to foreign exchange
movements because gains and losses on these contracts should offset losses and
gains on the assets, liabilities, and transactions being hedged. We are exposed
to credit-related losses if the counterparty to a financial instrument fails to
perform its obligation. However, we do not expect the counterparties, which
presently have high credit ratings, to fail to meet their obligations.
- 49 -
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
February 17, 2009
To the Stockholders of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
The management of Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. is responsible for the preparation, integrity, objectivity and fair
presentation of the financial statements and other financial information
presented in this report. The financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and reflect the effects of certain judgments and estimates made by
management.
In order to ensure that our
internal control over financial reporting is effective, management regularly
assesses such controls and did so most recently for our financial reporting as
of December 31, 2008. This assessment was based on criteria for effective
internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission, referred to as COSO. Our assessment included the
documentation and understanding of our internal control over financial
reporting. We have evaluated the design effectiveness and tested the operating
effectiveness of internal controls to form our conclusion.
Our internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that pertain to maintaining records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions
of assets, providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, assuring that receipts and
expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of our management
and directors and providing reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could
have a material effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Based on this assessment, the
undersigned officers concluded that our internal controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be
included in our periodic SEC filings and that information required to be
disclosed by us in these periodic filings is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that
our internal controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that our
financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
The Audit Committee of our Board
of Directors, which consists of independent, non-executive directors, meets
regularly with management, the internal auditors and the independent accountants
to review accounting, reporting, auditing and internal control matters. The
committee has direct and private access to both internal and external auditors.
BDO Seidman, LLP, the independent
registered public accounting firm who audits our financial statements, has
audited our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008
and has expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
|
Wesley R. Card
President and Chief Executive Officer |
John T. McClain
Chief Financial Officer |
- 50 -
|
BDO Seidman, LLP
Accountants and Consultants |
100 Park Ave
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: (212) 885-8000
Fax: (212) 697-1299 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
New York, New York
We have audited Jones Apparel
Group's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based
on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO
criteria). Jones Apparel Group's management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of
records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008 and our report dated February 12, 2009
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
New York, New York
February 12, 2009
- 51 -
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
BDO Seidman, LLP
Accountants and Consultants |
100 Park Ave
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: (212) 885-8000
Fax: (212) 697-1299 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
New York, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Jones Apparel Group's internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria
established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our
report dated February 12, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
New York, New York
February 12, 2009
- 52 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(All amounts in millions except per share data)
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ |
338.3 |
|
$ |
302.8 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
370.2 |
|
|
337.0 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
509.5 |
|
|
523.9 |
|
|
Prepaid income taxes
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT
ASSETS |
|
1,305.5 |
|
|
1,294.1 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
301.0 |
|
|
312.1 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
160.7 |
|
|
973.9 |
|
OTHER
INTANGIBLES, at cost, less
accumulated amortization |
|
590.8 |
|
|
618.0 |
|
DEFERRED TAXES |
|
14.2 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
55.3 |
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS |
$ |
2,427.5 |
|
$ |
3,236.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of
long-term debt |
$ |
250.0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
231.4 |
|
|
223.6 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
Accrued employee compensation
and benefits
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
Accrued restructuring and
severance payments
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
84.3 |
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
611.9 |
|
|
395.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
499.5 |
|
|
749.4 |
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
Income taxes
payable |
|
20.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
66.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
633.4 |
|
|
844.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
1,245.3 |
|
|
1,239.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value - shares authorized 1.0; none issued |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value - shares authorized 200.0; issued
154.8 and 153.6 |
|
1.5 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
1,350.7 |
|
|
1,339.7 |
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
1,668.0 |
|
|
2,480.8 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) income |
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Treasury stock,
71.4 and 68.3 shares, at cost |
|
(1,826.3 |
) |
|
(1,827.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY |
|
1,182.2 |
|
|
1,996.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
$ |
2,427.5 |
|
$ |
3,236.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 53 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(All amounts in millions except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
3,562.6 |
|
$ |
3,793.3 |
|
$ |
4,014.8 |
|
Licensing income |
|
52.1 |
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
51.1 |
|
Service and other revenue |
|
1.7 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
3,616.4 |
|
|
3,848.5
|
|
|
4,087.0 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
2,440.2 |
|
|
2,609.1
|
|
|
2,674.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
1,176.2 |
|
|
1,239.4
|
|
|
1,412.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
1,069.2 |
|
|
1,100.4
|
|
|
1,096.3 |
|
Loss on sale of Polo Jeans Company business |
|
- |
|
|
-
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
Trademark impairments |
|
25.2 |
|
|
88.0
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
813.2 |
|
|
78.0
|
|
|
441.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
(731.4 |
) |
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
(220.0 |
) |
Interest income |
|
7.5 |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
Interest expense and financing costs |
|
49.1 |
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
50.5 |
|
Gain on sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17.4 |
|
Gain on sale of interest in Australian joint venture |
|
0.8 |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
- |
|
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
8.1 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
|
(772.9 |
) |
|
(58.5 |
) |
|
(245.1 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
(104.4 |
) |
|
(70.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from
continuing operations |
|
(766.3 |
) |
|
45.9 |
|
|
(175.0
|
) |
Income from discontinued operations,
including gain on sale of Barneys, net of tax |
|
0.9 |
|
|
265.2 |
|
|
29.0 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for share-based payments, net of tax |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(765.4 |
) |
$ |
311.1 |
|
$ |
(144.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings
per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from
continuing operations |
$ |
(9.24 |
) |
$ |
0.46 |
|
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
0.01 |
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for share-based payments, net of tax |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
(loss) earnings per share |
$ |
(9.23 |
) |
$ |
3.11 |
|
$ |
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ |
(9.24 |
) |
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
0.01 |
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for share-based payments, net of tax |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
$ |
(9.23 |
) |
$ |
3.07 |
|
$ |
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
82.9 |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
82.9 |
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
$ |
0.56 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
- 54 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'
Equity
(All amounts in millions except per share data)
|
Number of
common
shares
outstanding
|
|
|
Total
stock-
holders'
equity
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
Accumu-
lated
other
compre-
hensive
(loss)
income
|
|
|
Treasury
stock
|
|
Balance,
January 1, 2006 |
115.9 |
|
$ |
$ 2,666.4 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$
|
1,269.4 |
|
$ |
2,426.2 |
|
$ |
(6.5 |
)
|
$ |
(1,024.2 |
) |
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
- |
|
|
(144.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(144.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Pension
and postretirement liability adjustments, net of $0.7 tax |
- |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
Change in fair value of
cash flow hedges, net of $1.5 tax |
- |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for hedge gains and losses included in net
loss,
net of $0.6 tax |
- |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
- |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
(143.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting for share-based payments |
- |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Issuance of
restricted stock to employees, net of forfeitures |
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization
expense in connection with employee stock options and restricted stock |
- |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Exercise of
employee stock options |
1.3 |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Excess tax
benefit derived from exercise of employee stock options and vesting of
restricted stock |
- |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Dividends on
common stock ($0.50 per share) |
- |
|
|
(55.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(55.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Treasury stock
acquired |
(9.8 |
) |
|
(306.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(306.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2006 |
107.9
|
|
|
2,211.6 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
1,320.0 |
|
|
2,226.4 |
|
|
(5.9 |
)
|
|
(1,330.4 |
) |
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
- |
|
|
311.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
311.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Pension
and postretirement liability adjustments, net of $1.7 tax |
- |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Change in fair value of
cash flow hedges, net of $1.8 tax |
- |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for hedge gains and losses included in net
income,
net of $0.4 tax |
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
- |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income |
|
|
|
319.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of sale of Barneys |
- |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
Forfeitures of
restricted stock by employees, net of issuances |
(0.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization
expense in connection with employee stock options and restricted stock |
- |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Exercise of
employee stock options |
0.6 |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Excess tax
benefit derived from exercise of employee stock options and vesting of
restricted stock |
- |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Dividends on
common stock ($0.56 per share) |
-
|
|
|
(57.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
-
|
|
|
(57.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Treasury stock
acquired |
(23.0 |
) |
|
(496.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(496.9 |
) |
Other |
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2007 |
85.3 |
|
|
1,996.8 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
1,339.7 |
|
|
2,480.8 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
(1,827.3 |
) |
Year ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
- |
|
|
(765.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(765.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Pension
and postretirement liability adjustments, net of $3.6 tax |
- |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
Change in fair value of
cash flow hedges, net of $0.6 tax |
- |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for hedge gains and losses included in net
income,
net of $0.3 tax |
- |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
- |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
(779.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of
restricted stock to employees, net of forfeitures |
1.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization
expense in connection with employee stock options and restricted stock |
- |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Exercise of
employee stock options |
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Excess tax
benefit derived from exercise of employee stock options and vesting of
restricted stock |
- |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(1.4 |
)
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Dividends on
common stock ($0.56 per share) |
-
|
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
-
|
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Treasury stock
acquired |
(3.2 |
) |
|
1.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2008 |
83.4 |
|
$ |
1,182.2 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
1,350.7 |
|
$ |
1,668.0 |
|
$ |
(11.7 |
)
|
$ |
(1,826.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
- 55 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(All amounts in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income |
$ |
(765.4 |
) |
$ |
311.1 |
|
$ |
(144.1 |
) |
|
Less:
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
(265.2 |
) |
|
(29.0 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for
share-based payments, net of
tax |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
(766.3 |
) |
|
45.9 |
|
|
(175.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile (loss) income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities, net of
acquisitions and divestitures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
on sale of Polo Jeans Company business
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of
stock in Rubicon Retail Limited
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
Impairment losses on
property, plant and equipment
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
Trademark impairments
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
813.2 |
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
441.2 |
|
|
|
Amortization
of employee stock options and restricted stock
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and other amortization
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of
interest in Australian joint venture
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
Equity in
loss (earnings)
of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
Dividends
received from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
- |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
8.7 |
|
|
(142.5 |
) |
|
|
Losses on
sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
1.8 |
) |
|
|
Other
items, net
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
22.5 |
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
11.1 |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
22.2 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
0.5 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
8.6 |
|
|
(55.5 |
) |
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable/prepaid
income taxes |
|
12.8 |
|
|
(171.7 |
) |
|
(41.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities |
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
4.9 |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
7.8 |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
941.8 |
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
561.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
of continuing operations |
|
175.5 |
|
|
119.5 |
|
|
386.2 |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
175.5 |
|
|
158.5 |
|
|
423.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of Barneys, net of cash sold and selling costs |
|
- |
|
|
845.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale of Polo Jeans Company business |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
350.6 |
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of interest in Australian joint venture |
|
0.8 |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Net cash received on
sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
Investment in GRI Group Limited |
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Costs related to acquisition of Rachel Roy Fashions, Inc. |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
(71.2 |
) |
|
(111.2 |
) |
|
(109.3 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of Mexican operations |
|
5.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
0.5 |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
(used in) provided by investing activities of continuing operations |
|
(84.4 |
) |
|
758.0 |
|
|
258.8 |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
(61.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
(used in) provided by investing activities |
|
(84.4 |
) |
|
717.5 |
|
|
197.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption at
maturity of 7.875% Senior Notes |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(225.0 |
) |
|
Net
repayments under credit facilities |
|
- |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
1.0 |
|
|
(496.9 |
) |
|
(306.2 |
) |
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options |
|
0.1 |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
(57.2 |
) |
|
(55.7 |
) |
|
Net cash
transferred to discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
Principal payments on capital leases |
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
Repayment of acquired debt |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Excess tax benefits
from share-based payment arrangement |
|
- |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
of continuing operations |
|
(51.4 |
) |
|
(666.4 |
) |
|
(608.6 |
) |
|
|
Net cash
provided by financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(51.4 |
) |
|
(648.5 |
) |
|
(584.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH |
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
3.8 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
35.5 |
|
|
231.3 |
|
|
36.6 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING,
including $7.2 and $6.9 reported under assets held for sale in 2007 and
2006 |
|
302.8 |
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING,
including $7.2 reported under assets held for sale in 2006 |
$ |
338.3 |
|
$ |
302.8 |
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
- 56 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated. The results of operations of acquired companies are included in our
operating results from the respective dates of acquisition.
We design, contract for the
manufacture of and market a broad range of women's collection sportswear, suits
and dresses, casual sportswear and jeanswear for women and children, and women's
footwear and accessories. We sell our products through a broad array of
distribution channels, including better specialty and department stores and mass
merchandisers, primarily in the United States and Canada. We also operate our
own network of retail and factory outlet stores, as well as several e-commerce
web sites. In addition, we license the use of several of our brand names to
select manufacturers and distributors of women's and men's apparel and
accessories worldwide.
The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.
In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," the results of operations of Barneys for all periods have been reported
as discontinued operations. We classify as discontinued operations for all
periods presented any component of our business that we believe is probable of
being sold or has been sold that has operations and cash flows that are clearly
distinguishable operationally and for financial reporting purposes. For those
components, we have no significant continuing involvement after disposal and
their operations and cash flows are eliminated from our ongoing operations.
Sales of significant components of our business not classified as discontinued
operations are reported as a component of income from continuing operations.
Credit Risk
Financial instruments which
potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist principally of
cash investments and accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents
in investment-grade, highly-liquid corporate money market funds that participate
in the U.S. Treasury's Temporary Guarantee Program. The Program protects our
money market investment balances as of September 19, 2008 through April 30,
2009. After September 19, 2008, we placed our cash and cash equivalents in
investment-grade, highly-liquid U.S. government agency corporate money market
accounts. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers' financial
condition and, generally, require no collateral from our customers. The
allowance for non-collection of accounts receivable is based upon the expected
collectibility of all accounts receivable.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Our primary objectives for holding
derivative financial instruments are to manage foreign currency and interest
rate risks. We do not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative
purposes. We have historically used derivative financial instruments to hedge
both the fair value of recognized assets or liabilities (a "fair value" hedge)
and the variability of anticipated cash flows of a forecasted transaction (a "cash flow" hedge). Our strategies related to derivative financial instruments
have been:
- the use of foreign currency forward contracts to hedge a portion of
anticipated future short-term inventory purchases to offset the effects of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates (primarily between the U.S.
Dollar and the Canadian Dollar) and
- 57 -
- the use of interest rate swaps to effectively convert a portion of our
outstanding fixed-rate debt to variable-rate debt to take advantage of lower
interest rates.
The derivatives we use in our risk
management strategies are highly effective hedges because all the critical terms
of the derivative instruments match those of the hedged item. On the date the
derivative contract is entered into, we designate the derivative as either a
fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. Changes in derivative fair values that
are designated as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings as offsets to the
changes in fair value of the related hedged assets and liabilities. Changes in
derivative fair values that are designated as cash flow hedges are deferred and
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until the
associated hedged transactions impact the income statement, at which time the
deferred gains and losses are reclassified to either cost of sales for inventory
purchases or to SG&A expenses for all other items. Any ineffective portion of a
hedging derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in cost
of sales. Differentials to be paid or received under interest rate swap
contracts are recognized in income over the life of the contracts as adjustments
to interest expense. Gains or losses generated from the early termination of
interest rate swap contracts and treasury locks are amortized to earnings over
the remaining terms of the contracts as adjustments to interest expense. The
fair values of the derivatives, which are based on observable inputs such as
yield curves or foreign exchange spot rates, are reported as other current
assets or accrued expenses and other current liabilities, as appropriate.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are reported at
amounts we expect to be collected, net of trade discounts and deductions for
co-op advertising normally taken by our customers, allowances we provide to our
retail customers to effectively flow goods through the retail channels, an
allowance for non-collection due to the financial position of our customers and
credit card accounts, and an allowance for estimated sales returns.
Inventories and Cost of Sales
Inventories are valued at the
lower of cost or market. Inventory values are determined using the FIFO (first
in, first out) and weighted average cost methods. We reduce the carrying cost of
inventories for obsolete or slow moving items as necessary to properly reflect
inventory value. The cost elements included in inventory consist of all direct
costs of merchandise (net of purchase discounts and vendor allowances),
allocated overhead (primarily design and indirect production costs), inbound
freight and merchandise acquisition costs such as commissions and import fees.
Cost of sales includes the
inventory cost elements listed above as well as warehouse outbound freight,
internally transferred merchandise freight and realized gains or losses on
foreign currency forward contracts associated with inventory purchases. Our cost
of sales may not be comparable to those of other entities, since some entities
include all of the costs associated with their distribution functions in cost of
sales while we include these costs in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Property, Plant, Equipment and Depreciation and Amortization
Property, plant and equipment are
recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed by the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold
improvements recorded at the inception of a lease are amortized using the
straight-line method over the life of the lease or the useful life of the
improvement, whichever is shorter; for improvements made during the lease term,
the amortization period is the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease
term (including any renewal periods that are deemed to be reasonably assured).
Property under capital leases is amortized over the lives of the respective
leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter.
Operating Leases
Total rent payments under
operating leases that include scheduled payment increases and rent holidays are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Rent expense on
our buildings and retail stores is classified as an SG&A expense and, for
certain stores, includes contingent rents that are based on a percentage of
retail sales over stated levels. Landlord allowances are amortized by the
straight-line method over the term of the lease as a reduction of rent expense.
- 58 -
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of
purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business
combinations accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. We test at
least annually our goodwill and other intangibles without determinable lives
(primarily tradenames and trademarks) for impairment through the use of
discounted cash flow models. Other intangibles with determinable lives,
including license agreements, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets (currently ranging from three to 19 years).
Foreign Currency Translation
The financial statements of foreign
subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with SFAS No. 52,
"Foreign Currency Translation." Where the functional currency of a foreign
subsidiary is its local currency, balance sheet accounts are translated at the
current exchange rate and income statement items are translated at the average
exchange rate for the period. Gains and losses resulting from translation are
accumulated in a separate component of stockholders' equity. Where the local
currency of a foreign subsidiary is not its functional currency, financial
statements are translated at either current or historical exchange rates, as
appropriate. These adjustments, along with gains and losses on transactions
denominated and settled in a foreign currency, are reflected in the consolidated
statements of operations. Net foreign currency losses reflected in results from
continuing operations were $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million in 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Defined Benefit Plans
Our funding policy is to contribute
at least the minimum amount to meet the funding ratio requirements of the
Pension Protection Act, which began to phase in during 2008.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock is recorded at
acquisition cost. Gains and losses on disposition are recorded as increases or
decreases to additional paid-in capital with losses in excess of previously
recorded gains charged directly to retained earnings.
Revenue Recognition
Wholesale apparel and footwear and
accessories sales are recognized either when products are shipped or, in certain
situations, upon acceptance by the customer. Retail sales are recorded at the
time of register receipt. Allowances for estimated returns are provided when
sales are recorded primarily by reducing revenues for the total revenues related
to estimated returns, with an offsetting reduction to cost of sales for the cost
of the estimated returns. Sales taxes collected from retail customers are
excluded from reported revenues. Licensing income is recognized based on the
higher of contractual minimums or sales of licensed products reported by our
licensees.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs billed to
customers are recorded as revenue. Freight costs associated with shipping goods
to customers are recorded as a cost of sales.
Advertising Expense
We record national advertising
campaign costs as an expense when the advertising takes place and we expense
advertising production costs as incurred, net of reimbursements for cooperative
advertising. Advertising costs associated with our cooperative advertising
programs are accrued as the related revenues are recognized. Net advertising
expense reflected in results from continuing operations was $54.7 million, $54.2
million and $71.0 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, net of
co-operative advertising reimbursements of $12.9 million, $12.8 million and
$13.1 million, respectively.
Income Taxes
We use the asset and liability method
of accounting for income taxes. Current tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the estimated Federal, foreign, state and local income taxes
payable or refundable on the tax returns for the current year. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences
of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets
and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax provisions are based on
the changes to the respective assets and
- 59 -
liabilities from period to period. Valuation allowances are recorded to
reduce deferred tax assets when uncertainty regarding their realizability
exists.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share includes no
dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the
effect of unvested restricted stock and common shares issuable upon exercise of
stock options. The difference between reported basic and diluted
weighted-average common shares results from the assumption that all dilutive
stock options outstanding were exercised and all convertible bonds have been
converted into common stock.
The following shares of unvested
restricted stock and options to purchase shares of common stock were outstanding
during a portion of 2007 but were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the unamortized deferred compensation related to the
unvested restricted shares or the exercise prices of the options were greater
than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, would be
antidilutive. For 2008 and 2006, none of the unvested restricted stock or
options outstanding were included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share due to the net loss for the year.
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
Number of
unvested restricted shares (in millions)
|
- |
0.2 |
- |
Number of options (in millions) |
- |
8.3 |
- |
Weighted average exercise price |
- |
$32.65 |
- |
Restricted Stock
Compensation cost for restricted
stock is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our stock
at the date the common stock is issued over the amount the employee must pay to
acquire the stock (which is generally zero). The compensation cost, net of
projected forfeitures, is recognized over the period between the issue date and
the date any restrictions lapse.
Long-Lived Assets
We review certain long-lived assets
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. In that regard, we assess the
recoverability of such assets based upon estimated non-discounted cash flow
forecasts. If an asset impairment is identified, the asset is written down to
fair value based on discounted cash flow or other fair value measures.
Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid
short-term investments to be cash equivalents.
Presentation of Prior Year Data
Certain reclassifications have been
made to conform prior year data with the current presentation.
New Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141(R)"), which
requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed,
and any noncontrolling interest of an acquiree at the acquisition date, measured
at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R)
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is prohibited. The adoption of SFAS
No. 141(R) is not expected to have a material impact on our results of
operations or our financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,"
which requires (1) ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent to be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the
consolidated statement of financial
- 60 -
position within equity, but separate from the parent's equity; (2) the amount
of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling
interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
statement of income; and (3) changes in a parent's ownership interest while the
parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted
for consistently as equity transactions. SFAS No. 160 applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December
15, 2008. Earlier application is prohibited. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not
expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial
position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities -
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133," which changes the disclosure
requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities," which classifies
unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) as participating
securities and requires them to be included in the computation of earnings per
share pursuant to the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per
Share." This Staff Position is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
years. All prior-period earnings per share data presented are to be adjusted
retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings,
and selected financial data). The adoption of this Staff Position will require
us to allocate a portion of net income to these participating securities. Under
the guidelines of this Staff Position, our basic (loss) earnings per share for
2006, 2007 and 2008 would be $(1.29), $3.07 and $(9.02), respectively, and our
diluted (loss) earnings per share for 2006, 2007 and 2008 would be $(1.29),
$3.03 and $(9.02), respectively.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
Accounts receivable consist of the
following:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts
receivable |
$ |
397.6 |
|
$ |
365.5 |
|
Allowances for doubtful
accounts, returns, discounts and co-op advertising |
|
(27.4 |
) |
|
(28.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
370.2 |
|
$ |
337.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A significant portion of our sales
are to retailers throughout the United States and Canada. We have one
significant customer in our wholesale better apparel, wholesale jeanswear and
wholesale footwear and accessories operating segments. Macy's, Inc. accounted
for approximately 21%, 20% and 21% of consolidated gross revenues for 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively, and accounted for approximately 17% and 21% of accounts
receivable at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On September 6, 2007, we completed
the sale of Barneys to an affiliate of Istithmar PJSC. In 2007, we recognized a
net after-tax gain on the sale of $254.2 million. In 2008, we reached final
settlement on certain liabilities remaining from the sale, resulting in an
additional after-tax gain of $0.9 million. In accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 144, the results of operations of Barneys have been reported
- 61 -
as discontinued operations. Operating results of Barneys, which
were formerly included in our retail segment, are summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
452.1 |
|
$ |
655.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations of Barneys before provision for income taxes |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
22.0 |
|
$ |
45.6 |
|
Provision for income
taxes |
|
- |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
of Barneys |
|
- |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Barneys
before provision for income taxes (1) |
|
1.5 |
|
|
389.1 |
|
|
-
|
|
Provision for income
taxes |
|
0.6 |
|
|
134.9 |
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Barneys |
|
0.9 |
|
|
254.2 |
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
265.2 |
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Net of $247.4 million of goodwill allocated to Barneys in
2007.
We have allocated $5.5 million and
$7.8 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively, of interest expense to discontinued
operations based on the weighted-average monthly borrowing rate under our senior
credit facilities applied to the average net monthly balance of funds that had
been advanced to Barneys.
ACCRUED RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Denim Restructuring
In late 2003, we began to evaluate
the need to broaden global sourcing capabilities to respond to the
competitive pricing and global sourcing capabilities of our denim
competitors, as the favorable production costs from non-duty/non-quota
countries and the breadth of fabric options from Asia began to outweigh the
benefits of Mexico's quick turn and superior laundry capabilities. On July
11, 2005, we announced that we had completed a comprehensive review of our
denim manufacturing operations located in Mexico. The primary action plan
arising from this review resulted in the closing of the laundry, assembly
and distribution operations located in San Luis, Mexico. All manufacturing
was consolidated into existing operations in Durango and Torreon, Mexico. A
total of 3,170 employees were terminated as a result of the closure.
In connection
with the denim restructuring, we recorded $11.4 million of net pre-tax costs
(of which $12.1 million was recorded in 2005 and $0.7 million was reversed
in 2006), which includes $5.1 million of one-time termination benefits, $3.1
million of losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment, $2.3 million
of contract termination costs and $0.9 million of legal and other associated
costs. Of these amounts, $10.1 million were reported as cost of sales and
$1.3 million were reported as a selling, general and administrative expense
in the wholesale jeanswear segment. The restructuring was substantially
completed during the fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2006.
The details of
the denim restructuring accruals are as follows:
(In millions)
|
|
One-time
termination
benefits
|
|
|
Contract
termination
costs
|
|
|
Other
associated
costs
|
|
|
Total
denim
restructuring
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006 |
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
Net reversals |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.7 |
) |
Payments and reductions |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 62 -
During 2006, $0.2 million of the
termination benefits accrual were utilized (relating to costs for 18 employees).
Secaucus Restructuring
On May 15, 2006, we announced the
closing of our Secaucus, New Jersey warehouse to reduce excess capacity. In
connection with the closing, in 2006 we incurred $2.8 million of one-time
termination benefits and associated employee costs for 211 employees and $1.6
million for cleanup costs and remaining rent payments. These expenses are
reported as selling, general and administrative expenses in the wholesale better
apparel segment. The restructuring was substantially completed in September
2006.
The details of the Secaucus
restructuring accruals are as follows:
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
One-time
termination
benefits
|
|
|
Closing of
facilities
|
|
|
Total
Secaucus
restructuring
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006 and 2007, $2.7
million and $0.1 million, respectively, of the termination benefits
accrual were utilized (relating to costs for 208 and three employees,
respectively).
Manufacturing Restructuring
On September 12, 2006, we announced
the closing of certain El Paso, Texas and Mexican operations related to the
decision by Polo to discontinue the Polo Jeans Company product line (the
"manufacturing restructuring"), which we produced for Polo subsequent to the
sale of the Polo Jeans Company business to Polo in February 2006. In
connection with the closings, we incurred $6.9 million of one-time termination
benefits and associated employee costs for 1,838 employees and $1.0 million of
other costs. Of this amount, $2.3 million has been recorded as a selling,
general and administrative expense and $5.6 million was recorded as cost of
sales in the wholesale jeanswear segment. At that time, we also determined the
estimated fair value of the property, plant and equipment employed in Mexico was
less than its carrying value. As a result, we recorded an impairment loss of
$8.6 million, which was reported as cost of sales in the wholesale jeanswear
segment in 2006. The closings were substantially completed by the end of March
2007. On May 8, 2008, we sold the Mexican operations for $5.9 million, resulting
in a gain of $0.2 million.
The details of the manufacturing
restructuring accruals are as follows:
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
One-time
termination
benefits
|
|
|
Other
associated
costs
|
|
|
Total
manufacturing
restructuring
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
6.9 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
-
|
|
Reversals |
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
(0.6 |
) |
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 63 -
During 2006, 2007 and 2008, $3.3
million, $3.6 million and $0.1 million of the termination benefits accrual were
utilized (relating to partial or full severance for 1,703, 123 and three
employees, respectively). The net accruals of $1.2 million at December 31, 2007
and $0.1 million at December 31, 2008 are reported as accrued restructuring and
severance payments.
Moderate Apparel Restructuring
In connection with the exit from and
reorganization of certain moderate apparel product lines, we decided to close
certain New York offices, and on October 9, 2007, we announced the closing of
warehouse facilities in Goose Creek, South Carolina. We recorded $7.4 million of
one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for approximately
440 employees and $0.9 million of lease obligations as selling, general and
administrative expenses in our wholesale jeanswear segment. These closings were
substantially complete by the end of February 2008.
The details of the moderate
apparel restructuring accruals are as follows:
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
One-time
termination
benefits
|
|
|
Lease
obligations
|
|
|
Total
moderate apparel
restructuring
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
7.9 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
5.7 |
|
(Reversals) additions |
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007 and 2008, $2.2
million and $4.3 million of the termination benefits accrual were
utilized (relating to partial or full severance for 113 and 328
employees, respectively). The net accrual of $5.7 million at December
31, 2007 is reported as accrued restructuring and severance payments.
The net accrual of $1.2 million at December 31, 2008 is reported as $1.3
million of accrued restructuring and severance payments and $0.1 million
of other noncurrent assets.
Other Restructurings
In December 2005, we closed our
warehouse facility in Bristol, Pennsylvania. In connection with the closing, we
accrued $3.6 million and $0.4 million in 2005 and 2006, respectively, of
one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for 118 employees.
These costs are reported as selling, general and administrative expenses in the
wholesale better apparel segment.
On May 30, 2006, we announced the
closing of our Stein Mart leased shoe departments, effective January 2007. In
connection with the closing, we accrued $1.2 million of one-time termination
benefits and associated employee costs in 2006 for 468 employees. Also in 2007,
we discontinued our Anne Klein Accessories retail concept. We accrued $0.1
million of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs in 2007
for 26 employees. These costs are reported as selling, general and
administrative expenses in the retail segment.
On October 17, 2007, we announced
the closing of warehouse facilities in Edison, New Jersey. In connection with
the closing, we accrued $2.6 million of one-time termination benefits and
associated employee costs for 158 employees. These costs are reported as
selling, general and administrative expenses in the retail segment. The closing
was substantially complete by the end of June 2008.
The details of these restructuring
accruals are as follows:
- 64 -
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Bristol
warehouse
|
|
|
Retail
stores
|
|
|
Edison
warehouse
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
- |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
- |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
Reversals |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, 2007 and
2008, $3.6 million, $1.2 million and $2.3 million of the termination
benefits accruals were utilized (relating to partial or full severance
for 90, 469 and 180 employees, respectively). The net accruals of $2.9
million and $0.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively,
are reported as accrued restructuring and severance payments.
Acquisition Restructurings
In connection with the acquisitions
of McNaughton, Kasper and Maxwell, we assessed and formulated plans to
restructure certain operations of each company. These plans involved the closure
of manufacturing facilities, certain offices, foreign subsidiaries, and selected
domestic and international retail locations. The objectives of the plans were to
eliminate unprofitable or marginally profitable lines of business and reduce
overhead expenses. These costs were reported as a component of goodwill.
The details of the acquisition
restructuring accruals are as follows:
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
One-time
termination
benefits
|
|
|
Other
costs
|
|
|
Total
acquisition
restructuring
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Payments and reductions |
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net accrual of $1.2 million at
December 31, 2007 is reported as $0.1 million of accrued restructuring and
severance payments and $1.1 million of other noncurrent liabilities. The net
accrual of $0.8 million at December 31, 2008 is reported as other noncurrent
liabilities.
SALE OF POLO JEANS COMPANY BUSINESS
In February 2006, we reached a
settlement of certain litigation that we had commenced in 2003 with Polo. In
connection with this settlement, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with
Polo and certain of its subsidiaries with respect to the sale to Polo of all
outstanding stock of Sun. Among other terms, we received gross proceeds of
$355.0 million in connection with the sale and the settlement. Sun's assets and
liabilities on the closing date primarily related to the Polo Jeans Company
business, which Sun operated under long-term license and design agreements
entered into with Polo in 1995.
We recorded a pre-tax loss of
approximately $145.1 million after allocating $356.7 million of goodwill to the
business sold and a pre-tax gain of $100.0 million related to the litigation
settlement. Approximately $3.7 million in state and local taxes was recorded
related to the litigation settlement, resulting in a combined after tax loss of
approximately $48.8 million. The combined loss created federal
- 65 -
and state capital loss carryforwards that we are using to partially offset
the gain realized from the sale of Barneys.
Long-lived assets included in the
sale include $2.0 million of net property, plant and equipment and $5.5 million
of unamortized long-term prepaid marketing expenses. Net sales for the Polo
Jeans Company business, which are reported under the wholesale better
apparel segment, were $24.6 million for 2006.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Major classes of property, plant and equipment are as
follows:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Useful
lives
(years)
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and
buildings |
$ |
73.0 |
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
10 - 20 |
Leasehold
improvements |
|
261.6 |
|
|
250.2 |
|
1 - 18 |
Machinery, equipment and software |
|
365.7 |
|
|
338.8 |
|
3 - 10 |
Furniture and
fixtures |
|
70.9 |
|
|
67.0 |
|
5 - 8 |
Construction in progress |
|
14.1 |
|
|
25.5 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785.3 |
|
|
751.8 |
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
484.3 |
|
|
439.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
301.0 |
|
$ |
312.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense relating to property, plant and equipment (including capitalized leases)
reflected in results from continuing operations was $76.3 million, $74.4 million
and $71.0 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2008, we
had outstanding commitments of approximately $7.9 million relating primarily to
the construction or remodeling of retail store locations. We capitalized
approximately $0.5 million of interest in 2007 as part of the cost of major
capital projects and capitalized no interest in 2008.
Included in property, plant and
equipment are the following capitalized leases:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Useful
lives
(years)
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
$ |
37.8 |
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
10 - 20 |
Machinery and equipment |
|
13.9 |
|
|
13.6 |
|
3 - 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
21.7 |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVENTORIES
Inventories are summarized as follows:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
Work in process |
|
- |
|
|
1.5 |
Finished goods |
|
509.2 |
|
|
522.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
509.5 |
|
$ |
523.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 66 -
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired and accounted for under
the purchase method. Accounting rules require that we test at least annually for
possible goodwill impairment. We perform our test in the fourth fiscal quarter
of each year using a discounted cash flow analysis that requires that certain
assumptions and estimates be made regarding industry economic factors and future
profitability. As a result of the 2006 impairment analysis, we determined that
the goodwill balance existing in our wholesale jeanswear segment was impaired as
a result of decreases in projected revenues and profitability with respect
certain moderate apparel brands, as well as changes in business strategy with
respect to our Norton McNaughton brand. Accordingly, we recorded an
impairment charge of $441.2 million. As a result of the 2007 impairment
analysis, we determined that the remaining goodwill balance existing in our
wholesale jeanswear segment was impaired as a result of further decreases in
projected revenues and profitability for certain brands. Accordingly, we
recorded an impairment charge of $78.0 million. As a result of the 2008
impairment analysis, we determined that the goodwill balance existing in our
wholesale footwear and accessories segment was impaired as a result of decreases
in projected revenues and profitability for the segment. Accordingly, we
recorded an impairment charge of $813.2 million.
The changes in the carrying amount
of goodwill for 2007 and 2008, by segment and in total, are as follows
(excluding $247.4 million allocated to the sale of Barneys):
(In millions)
|
|
Wholesale
Better
Apparel
|
|
|
Wholesale
Jeanswear
|
|
|
Wholesale
Footwear &
Accessories
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance, January 1,
2007 |
$ |
40.1 |
|
$ |
78.0 |
|
$ |
813.2 |
|
$ |
120.6 |
|
$ |
1,051.9 |
|
Impairment |
|
- |
|
|
(78.0 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(78.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
|
40.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
813.2 |
|
|
120.6 |
|
|
973.9 |
|
Impairment |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(813.2
|
) |
|
- |
|
|
(813.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2008 |
$ |
40.1 |
|
$ |
-
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
120.6 |
|
$ |
160.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also perform our annual
impairment test for indefinite-lived trademarks during the fourth fiscal quarter
of the year. As a result of the 2006 impairment analysis, we recorded trademark
impairment charges of $50.2 million as a result of decreases in projected
revenues for certain moderate apparel, better apparel, footwear and costume
jewelry brands. As a result of the 2007 impairment analysis, we recorded
trademark impairment charges of $7.5 million as a result of decreases in
projected revenues for certain brands. We also recorded trademark impairment
charges of $80.5 million in 2007 as a result of our decision to discontinue or
significantly reduce the scale of certain brands. As a result of the 2008
impairment analysis, we recorded trademark impairment charges of $25.2 million
as a result of decreases in projected revenues for certain brands. All trademark
impairment charges are reported as selling, general and administrative expenses
in the licensing, other and eliminations segment.
The components of other intangible
assets are as follows:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Amortized intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License
agreements |
|
$
|
60.5 |
|
$ |
45.8 |
|
$ |
60.5
|
|
$ |
43.5
|
Acquired favorable
leases |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
43.7
|
Indefinite-life trademarks |
|
|
575.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
600.7 |
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
636.9 |
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
$ |
661.7 |
|
$ |
43.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 67 -
Amortization expense reflected in
results from continuing operations for intangible assets subject to amortization
was $2.8 million, $2.3 million and $3.5 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization
for each of the years in the five-year period ending December 31, 2013 is
estimated to be $2.3 million in 2009, $2.0 million in 2010, $2.0 million in
2011, $1.9 million in 2012 and $1.4 million in 2013.
The cash flow models we use to
estimate the fair values of our goodwill and trademarks involve several
assumptions. Changes in these assumptions could materially impact our fair value
estimates. Assumptions critical to our fair value estimates are: (i) discount
rates used to derive the present value factors used in determining the fair
value of the reporting units and trademarks; (ii) royalty rates used in our
trademark valuations; (iii) projected revenue growth rates; and (iv) projected
long-term growth rates used in the derivation of terminal year values. These and
other assumptions are impacted by economic conditions and expectations of
management and will change in the future based on period-specific facts and
circumstances. The following table shows the range of assumptions we used to
derive our fair value estimates as part of our annual impairment testing for
2008 and 2007.
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Discount rates |
11.5% |
11.5% |
9.5% |
9.5% |
Royalty rates |
-- |
4.0% -
7.0% |
-- |
1.0% - 7.0% |
Weighted-average revenue growth rates |
2.8% |
7.5% |
3.1% |
6.0% |
Long-term growth rates |
3.0% |
0% - 3.0% |
3.0% |
0% - 3.0% |
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As a result of our
global operating and financing activities, we are exposed to changes in
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates which may adversely
affect results of operations and financial condition. In seeking to minimize
the risks and/or costs associated with such activities, we manage exposure
to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates through our
regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate,
through the use of derivative financial instruments. The instruments
eligible for utilization include forward, option and swap agreements. We do
not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. At
December 31, 2008, we had outstanding foreign exchange contracts to exchange
Canadian Dollars for a total notional value of US $10.5 million at a
weighted-average exchange rate of 1.2026 maturing through May 2009.
We recorded
amortization of net gains resulting from the termination of interest rate
swaps and locks of $2.3 million in 2006 as a reduction of interest expense
in continuing operations. We reclassified net gains (losses) of $1.0
million, $(0.7) million and $(0.5) million from foreign currency exchange
contracts to cost of sales in continuing operations in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. There has been no material ineffectiveness related to our
foreign currency exchange contracts as the instruments are designed to be
highly effective in offsetting losses and gains transactions being hedged.
An estimated $0.2 million of existing pre-tax net gains from currency
exchange contracts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income as of
December 31, 2008 will be reclassified into cost of sales in the next 12
months.
At December 31,
2008 and 2007, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and
accounts payable approximated their carrying values due to the short-term
nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of other financial
instruments subject to fair value disclosures, determined based on broker
quotes or quoted market prices or rates for the same or similar instruments,
and the related carrying amounts are as follows:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion |
|
$ |
749.5 |
|
$ |
462.2 |
|
$ |
$ 749.4
|
|
$ |
$ 655.3
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts, net
asset (liability) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
(1.8 |
) |
- 68 -
Financial instruments expose us to
counterparty credit risk for nonperformance and to market risk for changes in
interest and currency rates. We manage exposure to counterparty credit risk
through specific minimum credit standards, diversification of counterparties and
procedures to monitor the amount of credit exposure. Our financial instrument
counterparties are substantial investment or commercial banks with significant
experience with such instruments.
FAIR VALUES
We adopted SFAS No. 157, "Fair
Value Measurements," on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an
exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework, creates a fair value
hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value
measurements, and details the disclosures that are required for items measured
at fair value. FASB Staff Position FAS157-2,"Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157," defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in an entity's financial statements on a recurring basis, to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We currently do not have non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Under SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities," entities are permitted to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. We did not elect the fair
value measurement option under SFAS No. 159 for any of our financial assets or
liabilities.
We have several financial
instruments that must be measured under the new fair value standard, including
derivatives, the assets and liabilities of the Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Rabbi Trust") and deferred director fees that
are valued based on the quoted market price of our common stock. Our financial
assets and liabilities are to be measured using inputs from the three levels of
the fair value hierarchy, which are as follows:
- Level 1 - inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the
measurement date;
- Level 2 - inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets
or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted
prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates,
yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market
corroborated inputs); and
- Level 3 - unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or
liabilities based on the best information available.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
In accordance with the fair value
hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of our
financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value
on a recurring basis at December 31, 2008.
- 69 -
(In millions)
Description
|
Classification
|
|
Value at
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
Quoted
prices
in active
markets for
identical
assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
|
Rabbi
Trust assets |
Other
current assets |
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Derivatives |
Other
current assets |
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets |
$ |
6.5 |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rabbi
Trust liabilities |
Accrued
employee compensation and benefits |
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Deferred
director fees |
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities |
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities |
$ |
6.6 |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CREDIT FACILITIES
Prior to June 6, 2008, we had
revolving credit agreements with several lending institutions to borrow an
aggregate principal amount of up to $1.75 billion. These agreements, which
consisted of a $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility expiring in June
2009 and a $750.0 million five-year revolving credit facility expiring in May
2010, could be used for letters of credit or cash borrowings. On June 6, 2008,
we amended these facilities. The terms and conditions of the credit facilities
remained substantially unchanged, except for modification of the pricing
provisions and certain covenants and reduction of the aggregate commitment under
the $1.0 billion facility to $500.0 million. On December 24, 2008, we announced
that, effective as of December 31, 2008, we terminated our $500 million
revolving credit facility that was scheduled to expire on June 15, 2009, and
that, effective as of January 5, 2009, we further amended our $750 million
revolving credit facility which expires on May 16, 2010 to reduce the aggregate
commitment to $600 million, increase the fees and interest rates, modify certain
covenants and provide collateral for borrowings. Otherwise, the terms and
conditions of the credit facility expiring on May 16, 2010 remain substantially
unchanged. In connection with these amendments, we wrote off $1.1 million of
deferred financing fees, which is included in interest expense and financing
costs.
Up to $450 million of the amended
facility expiring on May 16, 2010 is available for the issuance of trade and
standby letters of credit, and cash borrowings are limited to the lesser of (a)
$400 million less amounts owed to the lending institutions or their
administrative agent under hedging agreements, treasury management services
agreements, open account agreements, letters of credit (other than those issued
under the facility) and other funded loans (the "Additional Secured Agreements")
and (b) the maximum amount of obligations permitted to be secured pursuant to
the Indenture dated November 22, 2004 (relating to our outstanding Senior Notes)
without any requirement to equally and ratably secure such Senior Notes.
Borrowings under the amended revolving credit facility may be used to refinance
existing indebtedness, for working capital needs and for other general corporate
purposes, including acquisitions. Borrowings under the amended revolving credit
facility and obligations under the Additional Secured Agreements are secured by
inventory and receivables of Jones USA and certain of its affiliates, as well as
the proceeds of such inventory and receivables, but only to the extent that the
grant of that security would not require the Senior Notes issued under the
Indenture to be equally and ratably secured by that collateral.
The amended revolving credit
agreement requires us to satisfy a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio, a maximum
Covenant Debt to EBITDA Ratio and a minimum Asset Coverage Ratio (each as
defined in the amended facility expiring on May 16, 2010), and contains
covenants limiting our ability to (1) incur debt and guaranty obligations, (2)
incur liens, (3) make loans, advances, investments and acquisitions, (4) merge
or liquidate, (5) sell or transfer assets, (6) pay dividends, repurchase shares,
or make distributions to stockholders, (7) engage in transactions with
affiliates and (8) make capital expenditures. At December 31, 2008, we are in
compliance with all covenants under the facility expiring on May 16, 2010
existing at that time and with all covenants in the amended agreement that took
effect on January 5, 2009.
- 70 -
At December 31, 2008, $175.8
million of letters of credit and no cash borrowings were outstanding under the
revolving credit facility expiring on May 16, 2010. The estimated maximum
amount of cash borrowings that would be available to us on that date under the
amended agreement that took effect on January 5, 2009 was $400.0
million. We believe this unused availability will be sufficient for our cash
borrowing needs for the foreseeable future.
At December 31, 2008, we also had
uncommitted unsecured lines of credit available for up to $51.5 million of
letters of credit, under which an aggregate of $45.8 million was outstanding. On
January 5, 2009, $50.0 million of these lines of credit were terminated and the
outstanding letters of credit were transferred to our amended revolving credit
facility. At December 31, 2008, we also had a C$10.0 million unsecured line of
credit in Canada, under which C$0.2 million of letters of credit were
outstanding.
The weighted-average interest rate
for our credit facilities was 4.8% and 5.8% at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Using the interest rate that took effect upon the effective date
of the amendment to our revolving line of credit on January 5, 2009, our
weighted-average interest rate for our credit facilities at December 31, 2008
would have been 6.2%.
LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the
following:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.250% Senior Notes due
2009, net of unamortized discount of $0.1 in 2007 |
$ |
250.0 |
|
$ |
249.9 |
|
5.125% Senior Notes due 2014, net of
unamortized discount of $0.1 and $0.1 |
|
249.9 |
|
|
249.9 |
|
6.125% Senior Notes due
2034, net of
unamortized discount of $0.4 and $0.4 |
|
249.6 |
|
|
249.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749.5 |
|
|
749.4 |
|
Less current portion |
|
250.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
499.5 |
|
$ |
749.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
maturities during the next five years amount to $250.0 million in 2009. All of
our notes contain certain covenants, including, among others, restrictions on
liens, sale-leaseback transactions and additional secured debt, and pay interest
semiannually. The weighted-average interest rate of our long-term debt was 5.2%
at both December 31, 2008 and 2007.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income is comprised of the
following:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
Pension and postretirement
liability adjustments |
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
(8.4 |
) |
Unrealized
gains (losses) on
hedge contracts |
|
0.2 |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(11.7 |
) |
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 71 -
DERIVATIVES
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," subsequently amended by SFAS No.
138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities" (as amended, hereinafter referred to as "SFAS 133"), establishes
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments. Specifically,
SFAS 133 requires us to recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities on the balance sheet and to measure those instruments at fair value.
Additionally, the fair value adjustments will affect either stockholders' equity
or net income, depending on whether the derivative instrument qualifies as a
hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the nature of the hedging activity.
We use foreign currency forward
contracts for the specific purpose of hedging the exposure to variability in
forecasted cash flows associated primarily with inventory purchases. These
instruments are designated as cash flow hedges as the principal terms of the
forward exchange contracts are the same as the underlying forecasted foreign
currency cash flows. Therefore, changes in the fair value of the forward
contracts should be highly effective in offsetting changes in the expected
foreign currency cash flows, and accordingly, changes in the fair value of
forward exchange contracts are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of related tax effects, with the corresponding asset or liability
recorded in the balance sheet. Amounts recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income are reflected in current-period earnings when the hedged
transaction affects earnings.
The following summarizes the U.S.
Dollar equivalent amount of our Canadian foreign currency forward exchange
contracts.
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Notional
amount
|
|
|
Fair
value -
asset
|
|
|
Notional
amount
|
|
|
Fair
value -
(liability
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar - U.S. Dollar |
|
$
|
10.5 |
|
$
|
0.1 |
|
$
|
24.4 |
|
$
|
(1.8 |
) |
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we
reclassified pre-tax (losses) gains of $(1.0) million, $(0.6) million and $1.8
million, respectively, from other comprehensive income to earnings from
continuing operations. Since the derivatives we use in our risk management
strategies are highly effective hedges because all the critical terms of the
derivative instruments match those of the hedged item, we record no
ineffectiveness related to our cash flow hedges. If foreign currency exchange
rates do not change from their December 31, 2008 amounts, we estimate that any
reclassifications from other comprehensive income to earnings within the next 12
months will not be material. The actual amounts that will be reclassified to
earnings over the next 12 months could vary, however, as a result of changes in
market conditions.
OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASES
Obligations under capital leases consist of the following:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouses, office facilities and equipment |
$ |
32.5 |
|
$ |
33.1 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
3.1 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases - noncurrent |
$ |
29.4 |
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We lease an office facility in
Bristol, Pennsylvania under a 20-year net lease that runs until July 2018 and
requires minimum annual rent payments of approximately $1.1 million. The
building was capitalized at $12.2 million, which approximated the present value
of the minimum lease payments. We also lease various equipment under two- to
six-year leases at an aggregate annualized rental of $3.7 million. The equipment
was capitalized at $11.3 million, which approximated the present value of the
minimum lease payments.
- 72 -
In 2003, we entered into a
sale-leaseback agreement for our Virginia warehouse facility. This transaction
resulted in a net gain of $7.5 million that has been deferred and is being
amortized over the lease term, which runs until March 2023 and requires minimum
annual rent payments of $2.4 million. The building was capitalized at $25.6
million, which approximated the present value of the minimum lease payments.
The following is a schedule by
year of future minimum lease payments under capital leases, together with the
present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2008:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
$ |
5.2 |
2010 |
|
4.5 |
2011 |
|
3.5 |
2012 |
|
3.6 |
2013 |
|
3.6 |
Later years |
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
48.9 |
Less: amount representing interest |
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
$ |
32.5 |
|
|
|
COMMON STOCK
The Board of Directors has
authorized several programs to repurchase our common stock from time to time in
open market transactions. We repurchased $496.9 million and $306.2 million of
our common stock during 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2008,
$304.1 million of Board authorized repurchases was still available. We may make
additional share repurchases in the future depending on, among other things,
market conditions and our financial condition.
On September 6, 2007, we entered
into an accelerated stock repurchase ("ASR") agreement with Goldman, Sachs & Co.
("Goldman") to repurchase $400 million of our outstanding common stock.
Purchases under the ASR were subject to collar provisions that established
minimum and maximum numbers of shares based generally on the volume-weighted
average price of our common stock during the term of the ASR program. We
received an initial delivery of 15.5 million shares on September 11, 2007 and a
second delivery of 2.4 million shares on October 18, 2007. Final settlement of
the ASR program was scheduled for no later than July 19, 2008 and could occur
earlier at the option of Goldman or later under certain circumstances. On June
5, 2008, Goldman informed us that it had concluded the ASR. As a result, we
received a final delivery of 3.2 million shares on June 10, 2008, bringing the
aggregate number of shares received under the ASR program to 21.1 million
shares. No cash was required to complete the final delivery of shares. The
combined average price for the shares delivered under the ASR was $19.00 per
share.
Our Board of Directors has
authorized our common stock repurchases as a tax-effective means to enhance
shareholder value and distribute cash to shareholders and, to a lesser extent,
to offset the impact of dilution resulting from the issuance of employee stock
options and shares of restricted stock. We believe that we have sufficient
sources of funds to repurchase shares without significantly impacting our
short-term or long-term liquidity. In authorizing future share repurchase
programs, our Board of Directors gives careful consideration to both our
projected cash flows and our existing capital resources.
- 73 -
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) CONTINGENT LIABILITIES. We
have been named as a defendant in various actions and proceedings, including
actions brought by certain employees whose employment has been terminated
arising from our ordinary business activities. Although the amount of any
liability that could arise with respect to these actions cannot be accurately
predicted, in our opinion, any such liability will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial position or results of operations.
(b) ROYALTIES. We have an
exclusive license to produce and sell women's footwear under the Dockers
Women trademark in the United States (including its territories and
possessions) and Canada pursuant to an agreement with Levi Strauss & Co. which
expires on December 31, 2011. The agreement requires us to pay a percentage of
net sales against guaranteed minimum royalty and advertising payments as set
forth in the agreement. Minimum payments under this agreement amount to $0.6
million, $0.6 million and $0.7 million for 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.
We have an exclusive license to
produce, market and distribute costume jewelry in the United States, Canada,
Mexico and Japan under the Givenchy trademark pursuant to an agreement
with Givenchy, which expires on December 31, 2011. The agreement requires us to
pay a percentage of net sales against guaranteed minimum royalty and advertising
payments as set forth in the agreement. Minimum payments under this agreement
amount to $0.7 million per year.
We have an exclusive license with
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. and its affiliate New Balance Licensing, LLC to
create and distribute a fashion-lifestyle footwear collection that brings
together New Balance's innovative performance and materials technology with Nine
West's fashion styling. The agreement, which expires December 31, 2009, requires
us to pay a percentage of net sales as set forth in the agreement. No minimum
payments are required under this agreement.
(c) LEASES. Total rent expense
charged to continuing operations for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was as follows.
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rent |
$ |
130.2 |
|
$ |
130.9
|
|
$ |
127.5
|
|
Contingent rent |
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Less: sublease rent |
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
(5.3)
|
|
|
(5.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122.9 |
|
$ |
126.1
|
|
$ |
123.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required
under operating leases:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
$ |
133.1 |
2010 |
|
127.5 |
2011 |
|
118.4 |
2012 |
|
99.0 |
2013 |
|
82.3 |
Later years |
|
266.8 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
827.1 |
|
|
|
Certain of the leases provide for
renewal options and the payment of real estate taxes and other occupancy costs.
Future rental commitments for leases have not been reduced by minimum
non-cancelable sublease rentals aggregating $26.7 million.
- 74 -
INCOME TAXES
The following summarizes the
(benefit) provision for income taxes for continuing operations:
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
$ |
(15.3 |
) |
$ |
(123.5 |
) |
$ |
49.1 |
|
State and local |
|
9.2 |
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Foreign |
|
4.5 |
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
(113.1 |
) |
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
(121.7 |
) |
State and local
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
(18.6 |
) |
Foreign
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
0.4 |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
8.7 |
|
|
(141.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for income taxes |
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
$ |
(104.4 |
) |
$ |
(69.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total income tax (benefit)
provision for continuing operations was recorded as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in loss from continuing operations |
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
$ |
(104.4 |
) |
$ |
(70.1 |
) |
Included in cumulative effect of change in
accounting for share-based payments |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
$ |
(104.4 |
) |
$ |
(69.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The domestic and foreign
components of (loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes from
continuing operations are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in (loss)
income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
$ |
(770.6 |
) |
$ |
(73.0 |
) |
$ |
(251.0 |
) |
Foreign |
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
14.5 |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(772.9 |
) |
|
(58.5 |
) |
|
(245.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in cumulative effect of change in
accounting for share-based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
-
|
|
|
- |
|
|
3.1 |
|
Foreign |
|
-
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before benefit
for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
(770.6 |
) |
|
(73.0 |
) |
|
(247.9 |
) |
Foreign |
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
14.5 |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(772.9 |
) |
$ |
(58.5 |
) |
$ |
(242.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 75 -
The benefit for income taxes from
continuing operations on adjusted historical income differs from the amounts
computed by applying the applicable Federal statutory rates due to the
following:
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for Federal income taxes at the statutory rate |
$ |
(270.5 |
) |
$ |
(20.5 |
) |
$ |
(84.8 |
) |
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
2.2 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
Foreign income tax
difference |
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
(3.7 |
) |
Nondeductible goodwill impairment |
|
265.8 |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
17.1 |
|
Capital loss on sale of
subsidiary |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(96.4 |
) |
Reversal of prior years federal, state and
foreign income tax
audit accruals |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
Valuation allowances |
|
- |
|
|
(107.2 |
) |
|
112.4 |
|
Other items, net |
|
0.7 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for income taxes |
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
$ |
(104.4 |
) |
$ |
(69.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have not provided for U.S.
Federal and foreign withholding taxes on $36.1 million of foreign subsidiaries'
undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2008. Such earnings are intended to be
reinvested indefinitely.
The following is a summary of the
significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities:
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible accruals and allowances |
$ |
58.0 |
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
Depreciation |
|
15.3 |
|
|
20.9 |
|
Intangible asset valuation and amortization |
|
(73.2 |
) |
|
(70.4 |
) |
Loss and credit carryforwards |
|
34.4 |
|
|
16.0 |
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation |
|
13.2 |
|
|
14.7 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
2.2 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
Inventory valuation |
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
(14.9 |
) |
Inventory overhead |
|
1.1 |
|
|
3.4
|
|
Pension |
|
7.4 |
|
|
3.0 |
|
Gain on sale-leaseback transaction |
|
2.7 |
|
|
2.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
(3.7 |
) |
Display costs |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
(1.6 |
) |
Other (net) |
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Valuation allowances |
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
$ |
42.2 |
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
$ |
42.2 |
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, we had
federal, state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $343.8 million,
which expire through 2028, foreign tax credit carryforwards of $10.1 million,
which expire through 2018, and state tax credit carryforwards of $8.1 million,
which expire through 2021.
In 2006, we determined that $303.1
million of capital loss carryforwards, $12.8 million of state net operating loss
carryforwards and $6.2 million of state credit carryforwards may not be
utilized; therefore, we established valuation allowances of $107.7 million, $0.7
million (net of federal tax benefit) and $4.0 million (net of federal tax
benefit) related to the capital loss, state net operating loss and credit
carryforwards, respectively.
- 76 -
In 2007, the capital loss
valuation allowance of $107.7 million was reversed as capital gain income
generated from the sale of Barneys fully utilized the capital loss
carryforwards. The reversal has been recorded in income from continuing
operations as the creation of the valuation allowance was recorded in continuing
operations in 2006 upon the sale of our Polo Jeans Company business. The state
net operating loss valuation allowance of $0.7 million was also reversed as the
2002 state net operating loss carryforward was unable to be utilized. During the
fourth fiscal quarter of 2007, we determined that $1.8 million of state credit
carryforwards expiring through 2021 may not be utilized; therefore, we
established a valuation allowance of $1.2 million (net of federal tax benefit)
related to the state credit carryforward.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN
48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109," which establishes that the financial statement effects of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return are to be recognized
in the financial statements when it is more likely than not, based on the
technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. FIN 48
also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
We adopted FIN 48 on January 1,
2007. We classify interest and penalties, if any, as a part of our provision for
income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the fourth
fiscal quarter of 2007, we determined that $16.7 million (net of federal tax
benefit) included in income taxes payable at December 31, 2006 should be
reclassified as uncertain tax position liabilities. The reclassification was due
to changes in our amended return filing positions and ongoing income tax audits
during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2007. Our total unrecognized tax benefits as
of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were $14.1 million and $16.7 million,
respectively (net of federal tax benefit), which included $7.3 million and $7.8
million of interest and penalties, respectively (net of federal tax benefit).
(In millions) |
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Uncertain tax positions at December 31,
2007 |
$ |
16.7 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Increases for tax positions related to
current year |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Increases for tax
positions related to prior years |
|
3.1 |
|
|
16.7 |
|
Settlements with tax authorities during
2008 |
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain tax positions at December 31,
2008 |
$ |
14.1 |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If recognized as of December 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, $14.1 million and $16.7 million, respectively (net
of federal tax benefit) of our unrecognized tax benefit would reduce income tax
expense and the effective tax rate.
We file a consolidated U.S.
federal income tax return as well as separate, unitary and combined income tax
returns in multiple state jurisdictions. In addition, we file income tax returns
in various foreign jurisdictions.
The Internal Revenue Service has
completed examination of our federal returns for taxable years prior to 2006.
Our state income tax examinations, with limited exceptions, have been completed
for the periods prior to 2004. The Internal Revenue Service is currently
examining our 2006 federal income tax return. We reasonably expect to settle all
ongoing audits by December 31, 2009.
- 77 -
(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE
The computation of basic and
diluted (loss) earnings per share is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ |
(766.3 |
) |
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
(175.0 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
0.9 |
|
|
265.2 |
|
|
29.0 |
|
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting for share-based payments |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss)
income |
$ |
(765.4 |
) |
$ |
311.1 |
|
$ |
(144.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding - basic |
|
82.9 |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
110.6 |
|
Effect of dilutive employee stock options and restricted stock
|
|
- |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares and share equivalents outstanding - diluted |
|
82.9 |
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
from continuing operations
|
$ |
(9.24 |
) |
$ |
0.46 |
|
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
0.01 |
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for share-based payments
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
$ |
(9.23 |
) |
$ |
3.11 |
|
$ |
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
from continuing operations
|
$ |
(9.24 |
) |
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
0.01 |
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for share-based payments
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
$ |
(9.23 |
) |
$ |
3.07 |
|
$ |
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for continuing
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
(received) during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
$ |
45.6 |
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
$ |
53.4 |
|
|
Net
income tax (refunds) payments |
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
67.7 |
|
|
106.2 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities
for continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquired through capital lease financing
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Restricted stock issued to employees |
|
20.3 |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
GAIN ON SALE OF STOCK IN RUBICON RETAIL LIMITED
On October 12, 2006, Mosaic
Fashions hf ("Mosaic") completed its acquisition of United Kingdom retailer
Rubicon Retail Limited ("Rubicon"). As a result of our sale of Nine West's
United Kingdom operations in January 2001, we obtained warrants to purchase
stock in Rubicon. These warrants were exercisable only upon a change of control
of Rubicon (including a public offering of Rubicon's shares) and, therefore, had
no ascertainable value prior to Mosaic's acquisition of Rubicon. Upon this
acquisition, we exercised these outstanding warrants and Mosaic purchased the
resulting shares. As a result, we recorded a gain of $17.4 million (net of
associated costs) in 2006.
- 78 -
STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK
Under two stock option plans, we
may grant stock options and other awards from time to time to key employees,
officers, directors, advisors and independent consultants to us or to any of our
subsidiaries. In general, options become exercisable over either a three-year or
five-year period from the grant date and expire 10 years after the date of grant
for options granted on or before May 28, 2003 and seven years after the date of
grant thereafter. In certain cases for non-employee directors, options become
exercisable six months after the grant date. Shares available for future option
and restricted stock grants at December 31, 2008 and 2007 totaled 4.2 million
and 5.2 million, respectively. Our policy is to issue new shares upon the
exercise of options and, when possible, to offset these new shares by
repurchasing shares in the open market. We currently have no plans to repurchase
any shares in 2009.
Compensation cost recorded for
stock-based employee compensation awards (including awards to non-employee
directors) reflected in continuing operations as a selling, general and
administrative expense was $12.3 million, $14.0 million and $12.8 million for
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The total tax benefit recognized for the
compensation cost recorded for stock-based employee compensation awards for
2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled $4.1 million, $2.4 million and $4.4 million,
respectively. Total compensation cost for continuing operations related to
unvested awards not yet recognized at December 31, 2008 was $11.5 million, which
is expected to be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately 21
months. Cash received from option exercises for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $0.1
million, $11.1 million and $32.4 million, respectively.
The following tables summarize
information about stock option transactions and related information (options in
millions):
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Outstanding, January 1 |
7.6 |
|
$32.44 |
|
9.4 |
|
$31.43 |
|
11.5 |
|
$30.91 |
Exercised |
- |
|
- |
|
(0.6 |
) |
$19.61
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
$24.01
|
Cancelled |
(0.3 |
) |
$34.21 |
|
(1.0 |
) |
$32.46 |
|
(0.5 |
) |
$35.44 |
Expired |
(0.3 |
) |
$24.37 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
$23.60 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
$39.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31 |
7.0 |
|
$32.73 |
|
7.6 |
|
$32.44
|
|
9.4
|
|
$31.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31 |
6.8 |
|
$32.61 |
|
7.2 |
|
$32.20
|
|
8.5
|
|
$30.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
Weighted-average
contractual term (in years) of:
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
end of year
|
2.5 |
3.4 |
4.2 |
Options exercisable at end of year
|
2.5 |
3.3 |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value (in
millions) of:
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
end of year
|
$ 0.1 |
$ 0.3 |
$ 32.1 |
Options exercisable at end of year
|
0.1 |
0.3 |
31.8 |
Options exercised
during the year
|
- |
6.8 |
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
Fair value (in millions) of options vested during the year |
$ 2.2 |
$ 3.0 |
$ 9.2 |
The fair value of
each option award is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility
of our stock price and implied volatilities from publicly traded options on our
stock. We use historical data to estimate an option's expected life; the
expected life for grants to senior management-level employees and other
employees are considered separately for valuation purposes. The risk-free
interest rate input is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of the grant. Compensation cost, net of projected forfeitures, is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the period between the grant and
vesting dates,
- 79 -
with compensation cost for grants with a graded vesting schedule recognized
on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each
separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance,
multiple awards. We did not grant any options in 2006, 2007 or 2008.
Compensation cost for restricted
stock is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our stock
at the grant date over the amount the employee must pay to acquire the stock
(which is generally zero). The compensation cost, net of projected forfeitures,
is recognized over the period between the issue date and the date any
restrictions lapse, with compensation cost for grants with a graded vesting
schedule recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period
for the total award. The restrictions do not affect voting and dividend rights.
The following tables summarize
information about unvested restricted stock transactions (shares in thousands):
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Fair
Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Fair
Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Fair
Value
|
Nonvested, January 1 |
757 |
|
$32.48 |
|
1,326 |
|
$33.61 |
|
1,092 |
|
$34.34 |
Granted |
1,327 |
|
$15.32 |
|
762
|
|
$32.36 |
|
635
|
|
$31.72 |
Vested |
(226 |
) |
$35.34 |
|
(346 |
) |
$34.46 |
|
(315 |
) |
$31.78
|
Forfeited |
(72 |
) |
$22.22 |
|
(985 |
) |
$33.21 |
|
(86 |
) |
$35.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, December 31 |
1,786 |
|
$19.78 |
|
757
|
|
$32.48
|
|
1,326
|
|
$33.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
Fair value (in millions)
of shares vested during the year
|
$ 8.0 |
$
11.9 |
$
10.0 |
During 2008, 1,327,074 shares of
restricted common stock were issued to 299 employees and directors under the
1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The restrictions generally lapse on the third
anniversary of issue. The value of this stock based on quoted market values at
the grant dates was $20.3 million.
During 2007, 761,750 shares of
restricted common stock were issued to 208 employees and directors under the
1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The restrictions generally lapse on the third
anniversary of issue. The value of this stock based on quoted market values at
the grant dates was $24.6 million.
During 2006, 634,927 shares of
restricted common stock were issued to 131 employees and directors under the
1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The restrictions generally lapse on the third
anniversary of issue. The value of this stock based on quoted market values at
the grant dates was $20.1 million.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Contribution Plan
We maintain the Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. Retirement Plan (the "Jones Plan") under Section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"). Employees not covered by a collective
bargaining agreement and meeting certain other requirements are eligible to
participate in the Jones Plan. Under the Jones Plan, participants may elect to
have up to 50% of their salary (subject to limitations imposed by the Code)
deferred and deposited with a qualified trustee, who in turn invests the money
in a variety of investment vehicles as selected by each participant. All
employee contributions into the Jones Plan are 100% vested.
We have elected to make the Jones
Plan a "Safe Harbor Plan" under Section 401(k)(12) of the Code. As a result of
this election, we make a fully-vested safe harbor matching contribution for all
eligible participants amounting to 100% of the first 3% of the participant's
salary deferred and 50% of the next 2%
- 80 -
of salary deferred, subject to maximums set by the Department of the
Treasury. We may, at our sole discretion, contribute additional amounts to all
employees on a pro rata basis.
We contributed approximately $7.1
million, $6.9 million and $8.2 million to our defined contribution plan from
continuing operations during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Defined Benefit Plans
We maintain several defined
benefit plans, including the Pension Plan for Associates of Nine West Group Inc.
(the "Cash Balance Plan") and The Napier Company Retirement Plan for certain
associates of Victoria (the "Napier Plan"). The Cash Balance Plan expresses
retirement benefits as an account balance which increases each year through
interest credits. All benefits under the Napier Plan are frozen at the amounts
earned by the participants as of December 31, 1995. Our funding policy is to
contribute at least the minimum amount to meet the funding ratio requirements of
the Pension Protection Act, which began to phase in during 2008. We plan to
contribute between $3.9 million and $7.6 million to our defined benefit plans in
2009. The measurement date for all plans is December 31.
Obligations and Funded Status
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
obligation, beginning of year |
$ |
39.0 |
|
$ |
$
43.3
|
|
Interest
cost |
|
2.6 |
|
|
2.6
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
1.5 |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
Settlements |
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.6
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, end of year |
|
40.3 |
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
of plan assets, beginning of year |
|
34.6 |
|
|
27.4
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
1.3
|
|
Employer
contribution |
|
2.2 |
|
|
9.4
|
|
Benefits
paid |
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
of plan assets, end of year |
|
26.4 |
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded status at end of year |
$ |
(13.9 |
) |
$ |
$(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized on the Balance Sheet
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
assets |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
13.9 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
22.9 |
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
- 81 -
Information for Pension Plans with an Accumulated Benefit Obligation in
Excess of Plan Assets
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit
obligation |
$ |
40.3 |
|
$ |
39.0 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
40.3 |
|
|
39.0 |
|
Fair value of plan
assets |
|
26.4 |
|
|
34.6 |
|
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in
Other Comprehensive Income or Loss
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic
Benefit Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
$ |
2.6 |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
Expected
return on plan assets |
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
(2.4 |
) |
Settlement costs |
|
1.8 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Amortization
of net loss |
|
0.8 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost |
|
2.5 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
Other Comprehensive Income or Loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain) |
|
11.0 |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Amortization of net gain |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income |
$ |
11.7 |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit
cost in 2009 is $1.5 million.
Assumptions
|
2008
|
2007
|
Weighted-average
assumptions used to determine: |
|
|
Benefit
obligations at December 31 |
|
|
Discount rate |
6.8% |
6.8% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
7.9% |
7.9% |
Net periodic benefit cost for year ended December 31 |
|
|
Discount rate |
6.8% |
6.1% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
7.9% |
7.9% |
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
Year Ending December 31, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
$ |
1.8 |
2010 |
|
1.8 |
2011 |
|
1.9 |
2012 |
|
2.2 |
2013 |
|
2.3 |
2014 through 2018 |
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.9 |
|
|
|
- 82 -
Plan Assets
The weighted-average asset allocations at December 31,
2008 and 2007 by asset category are as follows:
December 31,
|
2008
|
2007
|
Equity
securities |
56%
|
62%
|
Debt securities |
33%
|
31%
|
Other |
11%
|
7%
|
|
|
|
Total |
100%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
Our plans are designed to
diversify investments across types of investments and investment managers.
Permitted investment vehicles include investment-grade fixed income securities,
domestic and foreign equity securities, mutual funds, guaranteed insurance
contracts and real estate, while speculative and derivative investment vehicles
are generally prohibited. The investment managers have full discretion to manage
their portion of the investments subject to the objectives and policies of the
respective plans. The performance of the investment managers is reviewed on a
regular basis. The primary objectives are to achieve a rate of return sufficient
to meet current and future plan cash requirements and to emphasize long-term
growth of principal while avoiding excessive risk and maintaining fund
liquidity. At December 31, 2008, the weighted-average target allocation
percentages for fund investments were 48% U. S. equity securities, 34% fixed
income securities, 2% real estate and 16% international equity securities.
To determine the overall expected
long-term rate-of-return-on-assets assumption, we add an expected inflation rate
to the expected long-term real returns of our various asset classes, taking into
account expected volatility and correlation between the returns of the asset
classes as follows: for equities and real estate, a historical average
arithmetic real return; for government fixed-income securities, current yields
on inflation-indexed bonds; and for corporate fixed-income securities, the yield
on government fixed-income securities plus a blend of current and historical
credit spreads.
Other Plans
We also maintain the Nine West
Group Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, the Nine West Group Inc.
Postretirement Executive Life Plan, the Nine West Group, Inc. Postretirement
Medical Plan and the Nine West Group Inc. Long Term Disabled Postemployment
Benefit Plan, none of which have a material effect on our results of operations
or on our financial position. These plans, which are unfunded, were underfunded
by $4.2 million at December 31, 2008. Of this amount, $0.4 million is reported
under accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $3.8 million is
reported under other noncurrent liabilities.
We also maintain the Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, a non-qualified defined contribution
plan for certain management and other highly compensated employees (the "Rabbi
Trust"). Under the plan, participants may elect have up to 90% of their salary
and annual bonus deferred and deposited with a qualified trustee, who in turn
invests the money in a variety of investment vehicles as selected by each
participant. The assets of the Rabbi Trust, consisting of primarily debt and
equity securities, are recorded at current market prices. The trust assets are
available to satisfy claims of our general creditors in the event of bankruptcy.
The trust's assets, included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and
the corresponding deferred compensation liability, included in accrued employee
compensation and benefits, were $6.4 million and $12.0 million at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. This plan has no effect on our results of
operations.
- 83 -
JOINT VENTURES
We had two joint ventures formed
with HCL Technologies Limited ("HCL") to provide us with computer consulting,
programming and associated support services. HCL is a global technology and
software services company offering a suite of services targeted at technology
vendors, software product companies and organizations. We had a 49% ownership
interest in each joint venture, which operated under the names HCL Jones
Technologies, LLC and HCL Jones Technologies (Bermuda), Ltd. The agreement under
which the joint ventures were established terminated in January 2008, and the
parties have adopted plans of liquidation for both joint venture companies.
We also had a 50% ownership
interest in a joint venture with Sutton Development Pty. Ltd. ("Sutton") to
operate retail locations in Australia, which operated under the name Nine West
Australia Pty Ltd. We sold our interest in this joint venture to Sutton on
December 3, 2007 for $20.7 million, which resulted in a pre-tax gain of $8.2
million. The sales price was subject to certain working capital adjustments,
which resulted in additional sales proceeds and pre-tax gain of $0.8 million in
2008.
The results of our joint ventures
are reported under the equity method of accounting.
INVESTMENT IN GRI
On June 20, 2008, we acquired a
10% equity interest in GRI, an international accessories and apparel brand
management and retail-distribution network, for $20.2 million. GRI, which
(including its franchisees) operates over 800 points of sale in 12 Asian
countries, is the exclusive licensee of several of our brands in Asia, including
Nine West, Anne Klein New York, AK Anne Klein, Easy Spirit, Enzo Angiolini
and Joan & David. GRI also distributes other women's apparel, shoes and
accessory brands.
Under the terms of our investment,
GRI will be entitled to receive a future cash payment from us of up to $10.0
million if GRI's net income for its fiscal year ending January 31, 2009 exceeds
a specified earnings target. Any additional payment will be recorded as an
additional investment in GRI but will not increase our 10% equity interest.
Based on projected results of GRI for the remainder of its fiscal year, we
currently do not anticipate making any additional payments. The results of GRI
are reported under the equity method of accounting.
BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA INFORMATION
We identify operating segments
based on, among other things, differences in products sold and the way our
management organizes the components of our business for purposes of allocating
resources and assessing performance. Our operations are comprised of four
reportable segments: wholesale better apparel, wholesale jeanswear, wholesale
footwear and accessories, and retail. Segment revenues are generated from the
sale of apparel, footwear and accessories through wholesale channels and our own
retail locations. The wholesale segments include wholesale operations with third
party department and other retail stores and our own retail stores, the retail
segment includes operations by our own stores, and income and expenses related
to trademarks, licenses and general corporate functions are reported under
"licensing, other and eliminations." We define segment profit as operating
income before net interest expense, goodwill impairment charges, gains or losses
on sales of subsidiaries, equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates and
income taxes. Summarized below are our revenues and income by reportable segment
for 2008, 2007 and 2006. As a result of our exiting certain moderate product
lines during 2007, we renamed our wholesale moderate apparel segment as our
wholesale jeanswear segment to better reflect the products we produce in that
segment (which include jeanswear labels such as Gloria Vanderbilt, l.e.i.,
GLO, Bandolino Blu and Grane as well as the Energie, Erika and
Pappagallo product lines).
- 84 -
(In millions)
|
|
Wholesale
Better
Apparel
|
|
|
Wholesale
Jeanswear
|
|
|
Wholesale
Footwear &
Accessories
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Licensing,
Other &
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
$ |
1,098.7 |
|
$ |
796.5 |
|
$ |
938.3 |
|
$ |
730.2 |
|
$ |
52.7 |
|
$ |
3,616.4 |
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
146.5 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(232.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
1,245.2 |
|
|
800.3 |
|
|
1,020.1 |
|
|
730.2 |
|
|
(179.4 |
) |
|
3,616.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
(loss) |
$ |
122.3 |
|
$ |
18.8 |
|
$ |
56.4 |
|
$ |
(54.3 |
) |
$ |
(61.6 |
) |
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
expense |
|
|
(41.6 |
) |
|
Goodwill
impairment |
|
|
(813.2 |
) |
|
Gain on sale of Mexican operations and interest in
Australian joint venture |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
benefit for income taxes |
|
$ |
(772.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
$ |
7.4 |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
$ |
26.2 |
|
$ |
46.6 |
|
$ |
93.1 |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
1,101.0 |
|
|
985.0 |
|
|
955.8 |
|
|
753.7 |
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
3,848.5 |
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
155.8 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(239.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
1,256.8 |
|
|
995.7 |
|
|
1,028.4 |
|
|
753.7 |
|
|
(186.1 |
) |
|
3,848.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
(loss) |
$ |
126.0 |
|
$ |
(4.2 |
) |
$ |
109.2 |
|
$ |
(43.2 |
) |
$ |
(136.8 |
) |
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
|
|
(47.8 |
) |
|
Goodwill
impairment |
|
|
(78.0 |
) |
|
Gain
on sale of interest in Australian joint venture |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
benefit for income taxes |
|
$ |
(58.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
$ |
11.2 |
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
$ |
90.5 |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
$ |
1,127.4 |
|
$ |
1,142.0 |
|
$ |
941.1 |
|
$ |
822.7 |
|
$ |
53.8 |
|
$ |
4,087.0 |
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
145.4 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(203.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
1,272.8 |
|
|
1,145.8 |
|
|
995.0 |
|
|
822.7 |
|
|
(149.3 |
) |
|
4,087.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
$ |
143.1 |
|
$ |
71.8 |
|
$ |
96.8 |
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
$ |
(82.5 |
) |
|
266.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
|
|
(47.0 |
) |
|
Loss on sale of
Polo Jeans Company business |
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
Goodwill
impairment |
|
|
(441.2 |
) |
|
Gain
on sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations before benefit for income taxes |
|
$ |
(245.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
$ |
17.0 |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
$ |
86.4 |
|
(In
millions) |
|
Wholesale
Better
Apparel
|
|
|
Wholesale
Jeanswear
|
|
|
Wholesale
Footwear &
Accessories
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Licensing,
Other &
Eliminations
|
|
|
Assets
Held
for Sale
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
$ |
1,098.9 |
|
$ |
711.5 |
|
$ |
371.7 |
|
$ |
127.2 |
|
$ |
118.2 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,427.5 |
|
|
December 31,
2007 |
|
1,146.4 |
|
|
703.5 |
|
|
1,127.7 |
|
|
209.9 |
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,236.6 |
|
|
December 31,
2006 |
|
1,307.1 |
|
|
872.1 |
|
|
1,133.6 |
|
|
224.2 |
|
|
(356.7 |
) |
|
620.8 |
|
|
3,801.1 |
|
Revenues from external customers
and long-lived assets excluding deferred taxes related to continuing operations
in the United States and foreign countries are as follows:
On
or for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
$ |
3,279.0 |
|
$ |
3,523.2 |
|
$ |
3,801.0 |
|
Foreign countries |
|
337.4 |
|
|
325.3 |
|
|
286.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,616.4 |
|
$ |
3,848.5 |
|
$ |
4,087.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
$ |
1,083.5 |
|
$ |
1,930.0 |
|
$ |
2,088.1 |
|
Foreign countries |
|
24.3 |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,107.8 |
|
$ |
1,941.2 |
|
$ |
2,092.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 85 -
SUPPLEMENTAL PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTAL PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Certain of our subsidiaries function as co-issuers (fully and unconditionally
guaranteed on a joint and several basis) of the outstanding debt of Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. ("Jones"), including Jones USA, Jones Apparel Group
Holdings, Inc. ("Jones Holdings"), Nine West Footwear Corporation ("Nine West")
and Jones Retail Corporation ("Jones Retail").
The following condensed consolidating balance sheets, statements of
operations and statements of cash flows for the "Issuers" (consisting of Jones
and Jones USA, Jones Holdings, Nine West and Jones Retail, which are all our
subsidiaries that act as co-issuers and co-obligors) and the "Others"
(consisting of all of our other subsidiaries, excluding all obligor
subsidiaries) have been prepared using the equity method of accounting in
accordance with the requirements for presentation of such information. Separate
financial statements and other disclosures concerning Jones are not presented as
Jones has no independent operations or assets. There are no contractual
restrictions on distributions from Jones USA, Jones Holdings, Nine West or Jones
Retail to Jones.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
(In millions)
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Issuers
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Elim-
inations
|
|
|
Cons-
olidated
|
|
|
Issuers
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Elim-
inations
|
|
|
Cons-
olidated
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
318.4 |
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
338.3 |
|
$ |
264.0 |
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
302.8 |
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
219.7 |
|
|
150.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
370.2 |
|
|
205.3 |
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
337.0 |
|
|
Inventories |
|
339.3 |
|
|
170.6 |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
509.5 |
|
|
358.5 |
|
|
165.7 |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
523.9 |
|
|
Prepaid
and refundable income taxes |
|
15.0 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
12.5 |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
28.0 |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
|
34.7 |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
939.6 |
|
|
365.8 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
1,305.5 |
|
|
882.5 |
|
|
387.0 |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
1,294.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment - net |
|
135.4 |
|
|
165.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
301.0 |
|
|
161.2 |
|
|
150.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
312.1 |
|
Due from
affiliates |
|
- |
|
|
1,154.6 |
|
|
(1,154.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
971.7 |
|
|
(971.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
Goodwill |
|
160.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
160.7 |
|
|
972.8 |
|
|
67.6 |
|
|
(66.5 |
) |
|
973.9 |
|
Other
intangibles - net |
|
0.5 |
|
|
590.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
590.8 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
617.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
618.0 |
|
Deferred
taxes |
|
73.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(59.5 |
) |
|
14.2 |
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
1.3 |
|
Investments
in subsidiaries |
|
1,866.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,866.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
1,746.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,746.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
Other assets |
|
25.9 |
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
55.3 |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS |
$ |
3,202.0 |
|
$ |
2,305.9 |
|
$ |
(3,080.4 |
) |
$ |
2,427.5 |
|
$ |
3,810.2 |
|
$ |
2,205.9 |
|
$ |
(2,779.5 |
) |
$ |
3,236.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt |
$ |
250.0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
250.0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Current
portion of capital lease obligations |
|
- |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
160.4 |
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
231.4 |
|
|
175.0 |
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
223.6 |
|
|
Income
taxes payable |
|
- |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
|
0.1 |
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
20.4 |
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
- |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities |
|
85.7 |
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
127.3 |
|
|
96.6 |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
146.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
496.1 |
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
611.9 |
|
|
291.9 |
|
|
104.0 |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
395.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
499.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
499.5 |
|
|
749.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
749.4 |
|
|
Obligations
under capital leases |
|
- |
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
- |
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
(47.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
15.6 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Due to
affiliates |
|
1,154.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,154.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
971.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(971.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
66.8 |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
66.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
1,736.5 |
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
(1,201.7 |
) |
|
633.4 |
|
|
1,776.2 |
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
(977.5 |
) |
|
844.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES |
|
2,232.6 |
|
|
235.1 |
|
|
(1,222.4 |
) |
|
1,245.3 |
|
|
2,068.1 |
|
|
149.5 |
|
|
(977.8 |
) |
|
1,239.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock and additional paid-in capital |
|
1,352.2 |
|
|
1,706.8 |
|
|
(1,706.8 |
) |
|
1,352.2 |
|
|
1,341.2 |
|
|
1,707.8 |
|
|
(1,707.8 |
) |
|
1,341.2 |
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
1,455.2 |
|
|
365.7 |
|
|
(152.9 |
) |
|
1,668.0 |
|
|
2,226.1 |
|
|
339.7 |
|
|
(85.0 |
) |
|
2,480.8 |
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
1.7 |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
2.1 |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
(1,826.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,826.3 |
) |
|
(1,827.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,827.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
969.4 |
|
|
2,070.8 |
|
|
(1,858.0 |
) |
|
1,182.2 |
|
|
1,742.1 |
|
|
2,056.4 |
|
|
(1,801.7 |
) |
|
1,996.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
$ |
3,202.0 |
|
$ |
2,305.9 |
|
$ |
(3,080.4 |
) |
$ |
2,427.5 |
|
$ |
3,810.2 |
|
$ |
2,205.9 |
|
$ |
(2,779.5 |
) |
$ |
3,236.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 86 -
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
(In millions)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Issuers
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Elim-
inations
|
|
|
Cons-
olidated
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
2,630.6 |
|
$ |
949.4 |
|
$ |
(17.4 |
) |
$ |
3,562.6 |
|
Licensing
income |
|
0.1 |
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
52.1 |
|
Service
and other revenue |
|
1.1 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
|
2,631.8 |
|
|
1,002.0 |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
3,616.4 |
|
Cost of goods
sold |
|
1,756.5 |
|
|
692.1 |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
2,440.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
875.3 |
|
|
309.9 |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
1,176.2 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
|
975.7 |
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
1,069.2 |
|
Trademark
impairments |
|
- |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
25.2 |
|
Goodwill
impairment |
|
812.0 |
|
|
67.6 |
|
|
(66.4 |
) |
|
813.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
(loss) income |
|
(912.4 |
) |
|
110.7 |
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
(731.4 |
) |
Net interest
expense (income) and financing costs |
|
51.6 |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
41.6 |
|
Gain on sale of
interest in Australian joint venture |
|
- |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Equity
in loss of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
- |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
income from continuing
operations before benefit for income taxes |
|
(964.0 |
) |
|
121.0 |
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
(772.9 |
) |
(Benefit)
provision for
income taxes |
|
(106.4 |
) |
|
94.9 |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
(857.6 |
) |
|
26.1 |
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
(766.3 |
) |
Income
from
discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
0.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.9 |
|
Equity
in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
133.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(133.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(723.6 |
) |
$ |
26.1 |
|
$ |
(67.9 |
) |
$ |
(765.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Issuers
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Elim-
inations
|
|
|
Cons-
olidated
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
2,642.9 |
|
$ |
1,167.7 |
|
$ |
(17.3 |
) |
$ |
3,793.3 |
|
Licensing
income |
|
0.1 |
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
52.0 |
|
Service
and other revenue |
|
1.0 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
|
2,644.0 |
|
|
1,221.8 |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
3,848.5 |
|
Cost of goods
sold |
|
1,723.5 |
|
|
893.9 |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
2,609.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
920.5 |
|
|
327.9 |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
1,239.4 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
|
981.6 |
|
|
131.6 |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
1,100.4 |
|
Trademark
impairments |
|
- |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
88.0 |
|
Goodwill
impairment |
|
394.7 |
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
(394.7 |
) |
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
(loss) income |
|
(455.8 |
) |
|
30.3 |
|
|
398.5 |
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
Net interest
expense (income) and financing costs |
|
66.6 |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
47.8 |
|
Gain on sale of
interest in Australian joint venture |
|
- |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
8.2 |
|
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
0.5 |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
income from continuing
operations before benefit for income taxes |
|
(521.9 |
) |
|
62.9 |
|
|
400.5 |
|
|
(58.5 |
) |
(Benefit)
provision for
income taxes |
|
(147.4 |
) |
|
43.1 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
(104.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
(374.5 |
) |
|
19.8 |
|
|
400.6 |
|
|
45.9 |
|
Income
(loss) from
discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
291.8 |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
265.2 |
|
Equity
in loss of subsidiaries |
|
(155.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
155.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(238.5 |
) |
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
$ |
556.4 |
|
$ |
311.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Issuers
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Elim-
inations
|
|
|
Cons-
olidated
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
2,699.3 |
|
$ |
1,332.3 |
|
$ |
(16.8 |
) |
$ |
4,014.8 |
|
Licensing
income |
|
0.1 |
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
51.1 |
|
Service
and other revenue |
|
2.8 |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
|
2,702.2 |
|
|
1,401.6 |
|
|
(16.8 |
) |
|
4,087.0 |
|
Cost of goods
sold |
|
1,675.0 |
|
|
1,000.3 |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
2,674.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
1,027.2 |
|
|
401.3 |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
1,412.8 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
|
987.7 |
|
|
121.7 |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
1,096.3 |
|
Loss on sale of
Polo Jeans Company business |
|
22.8 |
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
45.1 |
|
Trademark
impairments |
|
- |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
50.2 |
|
Goodwill
impairment |
|
- |
|
|
441.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
441.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss) |
|
16.7 |
|
|
(234.1 |
) |
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
(220.0 |
) |
Net interest
expense (income) and financing costs |
|
64.9 |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
47.0 |
|
Gain on sale of
stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
|
17.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17.4 |
|
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
0.5 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing
operations before benefit for income taxes |
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
(211.7 |
) |
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
(245.1 |
) |
Benefit for
income taxes |
|
- |
|
|
(61.0 |
) |
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
(70.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations |
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
(150.7 |
) |
|
6.0 |
|
|
(175.0 |
) |
Income from
discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
- |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
29.0 |
|
Equity
in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
103.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(103.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting for share-based payments, net of tax |
|
1.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) |
$ |
75.2 |
|
$ |
(121.7 |
) |
$ |
(97.6 |
) |
$ |
(144.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- - 87 -
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Issuers
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
$ |
141.1 |
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
$ |
175.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of
interest in Australian joint venture |
|
- |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of
Mexican operations |
|
- |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
Investment in GRI Group Limited |
|
- |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
(39.9 |
) |
|
(31.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(71.2 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of
property, plant and equipment |
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
Other |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities |
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
(44.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(84.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
1.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options |
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
0.8 |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
Other
items |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities |
|
(47.0 |
) |
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
0.8 |
|
|
(51.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rates on cash |
|
- |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
54.4 |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
35.5 |
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning |
|
264.0 |
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
302.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, ending |
$ |
318.4 |
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
338.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Issuers
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
$ |
105.9 |
|
$ |
37.3 |
|
$ |
(23.7 |
) |
$ |
119.5 |
|
|
Net cash provided by
operating activities
of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
105.9 |
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
158.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of Barneys, net of cash sold and selling costs |
|
845.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
845.5 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of
interest in Australian joint venture |
|
- |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
(59.5 |
) |
|
(51.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(111.2 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of
property, plant and equipment |
|
0.2 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities of continuing operations |
|
786.2 |
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
758.0 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
786.2 |
|
|
(68.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
717.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayment under credit facilities |
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
(496.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(496.9 |
) |
|
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options |
|
11.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
(57.2 |
) |
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
23.7 |
|
|
(57.2 |
) |
|
Net cash
transferred to discontinued operations |
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payment arrangements |
|
2.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
Other
items |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities of continuing operations |
|
(663.1 |
) |
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
23.7 |
|
|
(666.4 |
) |
|
Net cash
provided by financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities |
|
(663.1 |
) |
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
23.7 |
|
|
(648.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rates on cash |
|
- |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
229.0 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
231.3 |
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning, including cash reported under assets held for
sale |
|
35.0 |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, ending |
$ |
264.0 |
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
302.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Issuers
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
$ |
321.4 |
|
$ |
$
65.8 |
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
$ |
386.2 |
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
321.4 |
|
|
103.3 |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
423.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale of Polo Jeans Company business |
|
344.1 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
350.6 |
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
(62.2 |
) |
|
(47.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(109.3 |
) |
|
Net cash
received from sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
|
17.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
Proceeds from sales of
property, plant and equipment |
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
of continuing operations |
|
299.4 |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
258.8 |
|
|
Net cash
used in investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
(61.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(61.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
299.4 |
|
|
(101.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
197.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Senior Notes |
|
(225.0 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(225.0 |
) |
|
Net repayment under credit facilities |
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
(306.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(306.2 |
) |
|
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options |
|
32.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
(55.7 |
) |
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
1.0 |
|
|
(55.7 |
) |
|
Net cash
transferred to discontinued operations |
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payment arrangements |
|
3.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
Other
items |
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities of continuing operations |
|
(606.1 |
) |
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
1.0 |
|
|
(608.6 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
of discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided
by financing activities |
|
(606.1 |
) |
|
20.5 |
) |
|
1.0 |
|
|
(584.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rates on cash |
|
- |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase cash and cash equivalents |
|
14.7 |
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
36.6 |
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning, including cash reported under assets held for
sale |
|
20.3 |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, ending, including cash reported under assets held for sale |
$ |
35.0 |
|
$ |
36.5 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 88 -
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Unaudited interim consolidated financial information for the
two years ended December 31, 2008 is summarized as follows:
|
(In millions except per share data)
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
963.4 |
|
$ |
820.2 |
|
$ |
948.6
|
|
$ |
830.5 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
975.4 |
|
|
829.4 |
|
|
964.7 |
|
|
846.9 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
320.7 |
|
|
282.4 |
|
|
323.3 |
|
|
249.9 |
|
|
Operating income (loss)
(1) |
|
39.9 |
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
(848.6 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
19.5 |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
(822.8 |
) |
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
19.5 |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
(822.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from
continuing operations |
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
(10.08 |
) |
|
Basic earnings per share
from discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
0.23 |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
(10.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share from continuing operations |
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
(10.08 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings
per share from discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share |
|
0.23 |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
(10.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
1,064.5
|
|
$ |
894.5
|
|
$ |
1,011.8
|
|
$ |
822.4
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
1,078.5 |
|
|
903.9
|
|
|
1,027.6 |
|
|
838.5
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
365.1
|
|
|
290.2
|
|
|
326.5
|
|
|
257.6
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
(2) |
|
83.2
|
|
|
(72.3 |
) |
|
59.2
|
|
|
(97.1 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
(3) |
|
44.4
|
|
|
(51.1 |
) |
|
138.4
|
|
|
(85.8 |
) |
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued
operations (4) |
|
3.4
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
261.7
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
47.8
|
|
|
(47.1 |
) |
|
400.1
|
|
|
(89.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from
continuing operations |
$ |
0.42
|
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
$ |
1.39
|
|
$ |
(1.01 |
) |
|
Basic earnings per share
from discontinued operations |
|
0.03
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
0.45
|
|
|
(0.44 |
) |
|
4.01
|
|
|
(1.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share from continuing operations |
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
$ |
1.37
|
|
$ |
(1.01 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings
per share from discontinued operations |
|
0.03 |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share |
|
0.44 |
|
|
(0.44 |
) |
|
3.97
|
|
|
(1.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.14
|
|
$ |
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly figures may not add to full year
due to rounding.
(1) |
Includes goodwill impairment
of $813.2 million and trademark impairments of $25.2 million in the
fourth fiscal quarter of 2008.
|
(2) |
Includes trademark impairments
of $80.5 million and $7.5 million in the third and fourth fiscal
quarters of 2007, respectively, and goodwill impairment of $78.0 million
in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2007.
|
(3) |
Includes $107.7 million reversal of a deferred tax
valuation allowance in the third fiscal quarter of 2007 previously created from
capital loss carryforwards arising from the sale of our Polo Jeans Company
business in 2006.
|
(4) |
Includes $254.2 million from sale of Barneys in the third
fiscal quarter of 2007.
|
- 89 -
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
The purpose of disclosure controls
is to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with
or submitted to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and
forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. The purpose of internal controls is to
provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized, our
assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use and our transactions
are properly recorded and reported to permit the preparation of our financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our management does not expect
that our disclosure controls or our internal controls will prevent all error and
all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the objectives of
the control system are met. The design of a control system must also reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, with the benefits of controls
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud (if any) within the company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that simple errors or mistakes can occur.
Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The
design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any
design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Our internal controls are
evaluated on an ongoing basis by our Internal Audit department, by other
personnel in our organization and by our independent auditors in connection with
their audit and review activities. The overall goals of these various evaluation
activities are to monitor our disclosure and internal controls and to make
modifications as necessary, as disclosure and internal controls are intended to
be dynamic systems that change (including improvements and corrections) as
conditions warrant. Part of this evaluation is to determine whether there were
any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls, or
whether we had identified any acts of fraud involving personnel who have a
significant role in the our internal controls. Significant deficiencies are
control issues that could have a significant adverse effect on the ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data in the financial
statements; material weaknesses are particularly serious conditions where the
internal control does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that
misstatements caused by error or fraud may occur in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.
Based upon this evaluation, our
President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded
that both our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
required to be included in our periodic SEC
- 90 -
filings and ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in these
periodic filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that our internal controls
are effective in ensuring that our financial statements are fairly presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
We have made changes to our
internal controls and procedures over financial reporting to address the
implementation of SAP, an enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system, which
occurred during the fourth quarter of 2006. We began the process of implementing
SAP throughout Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries. SAP
will integrate our operational and financial systems and expand the
functionality of our financial reporting processes. During the fourth fiscal
quarter of 2008, no additional businesses were converted to this system. We have
adequately controlled the transition to the new processes and controls, with no
negative impact to our internal control environment. We expect to roll out the
implementation of this system to all locations over a multi-year period. As the
phased roll out occurs, we will experience changes in internal control over
financial reporting each quarter. We expect this ERP system to further advance
our control environment by automating manual processes, improving management
visibility and standardizing processes as its full capabilities are utilized.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management's report on Internal
Control Over Financial reporting appears on page 50. Our independent registered
public accounting firm, BDO Seidman, LLP, has issued an audit report on our
internal control over financial reporting, which appears on page 51.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information about our
directors appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Election of
Directors" is incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics and a Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial
Officers, which applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Controller and other personnel performing similar functions. Both codes are
posted on our website, www.jonesapparel.com under the "Our Company - Corporate
Governance" caption. We intend to make all required disclosures regarding any
amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of the Code of Ethics for Senior
Executive and Financial Officers by posting such information on our website.
The information appearing in the
Proxy Statement relating to the members of the Audit Committee and the Audit
Committee financial expert under the captions "Corporate Governance - Board
Structure and Committee Composition" and "Corporate Governance - Board Structure
and Committee Composition - Audit Committee" and the information appearing in
the Proxy Statement under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance" is incorporated herein by this reference.
The balance of the information
required by this item is contained in the discussion entitled "Executive
Officers of the Registrant" in Part I of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information appearing in the
Proxy Statement under the captions "Executive Compensation," "Corporate
Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and
the information appearing in the Proxy Statement relating to the compensation of
directors under the caption "Corporate Governance - Director Compensation and
Stock Ownership Guidelines" is incorporated herein by this reference.
- 91 -
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information appearing in the
Proxy Statement under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners" is incorporated herein by this reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table
gives information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of
options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans
as of December 31, 2008. For further information, see "Stock Options and
Restricted Stock" in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Plan Category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights |
Number of securities remaining available for future
issuance under equity compensation plans |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
7,018,859 |
$32.73 |
4,225,559 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Total |
7,018,859 |
$32.73 |
4,225.559 |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information appearing in the
Proxy Statement under the captions "Corporate Governance - Independence of
Directors," "Corporate Governance - Board Structure and Committee Composition"
and "Corporate Governance - Policy with Respect to Related Person Transactions"
is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information appearing
in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Fees Paid to Independent Registered
Public Accountants" is incorporated herein by this reference.
- 92 -
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
|
1. |
Financial Statements. |
|
|
The following financial statements are included in Item
8 of this report: |
|
|
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31,
2008 and 2007 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations - Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'
Equity - Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (includes
certain supplemental financial information required by Item 8 of Form
10-K) |
|
2. |
The schedule and report of independent
registered public accounting firm thereon, listed in the Index to Financial Statement
Schedules attached hereto. |
|
3. |
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto. |
- 93 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
February 17, 2009 |
|
JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Wesley R. Card
Wesley R. Card
President and Chief Executive Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,
that each person whose signature appears on this page to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K")
constitutes and appoints Wesley R. Card, John T. McClain and Ira M. Dansky, and
each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power
of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to the Form 10-K, and
file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and grants unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might and
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
/s/ Wesley R. Card
Wesley R. Card |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Sidney Kimmel
Sidney Kimmel |
Chairman and Director
|
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ John T. McClain
John T. McClain |
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Christopher R. Cade
Christopher R. Cade |
Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting
Officer and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Matthew H. Kamens
Matthew H. Kamens |
Director |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ J. Robert Kerrey
J. Robert Kerrey |
Director |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Ann N. Reese
Ann N. Reese |
Director |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Gerald C. Crotty
Gerald C. Crotty |
Director |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Lowell W. Robinson
Lowell W. Robinson |
Director |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Donna F. Zarcone
Donna F. Zarcone |
Director |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Margaret H. Georgiadis
Margaret H. Georgiadis |
Director |
February 17, 2009 |
/s/ Robert L. Mettler
Robert L. Mettler |
Director |
February 17, 2009 |
- 94 -
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Schedule II.
Schedule II. Valuation and qualifying accounts
Schedules other than those listed above have been omitted
since the information is not applicable, not required or is included in the
respective financial statements or notes thereto.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit1
|
2.1 |
Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated September 10, 1998, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc.,
SAI Acquisition Corp., Sun Apparel, Inc. and the selling shareholders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated September 24, 1998). |
2.2 |
Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of March 1, 1999, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Jill Acquisition
Sub Inc. and Nine West Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 2, 1999). |
2.3 |
Securities
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 31, 2000, among Jones Apparel
Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Victoria + Co Ltd. and the
Shareholders and Warrantholders of Victoria + Co Ltd (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended April 2, 2000). |
2.4 |
Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of April 13, 2001, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., MCN Acquisition
Corp. and McNaughton Apparel Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2001). |
2.5 |
Purchase
Agreement dated as of August 7, 2003 between Kasper A.S.L., Ltd. and Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended October 4, 2003). |
2.6 |
Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of June 18, 2004, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., MSC Acquisition
Corp. and Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.D.3 of Amendment No. 16 to our Schedule TO dated June 21, 2004). |
3.1 |
Articles of
Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998). |
3.2 |
Amended and Restated By-Laws
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the six months ended July 7, 2007). |
4.1 |
Form of
Certificate evidencing shares of common stock of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Shelf Registration
Statement on Form S-3, filed on October 28, 1998 (Registration No.
333-66223)). |
4.2 |
Exchange and Note Registration
Rights Agreement dated June 15, 1999, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Bear,
Stearns & Co. Inc., Chase Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated, Salomon Smith Barney Inc., BancBoston Robertson Stephens
Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, ING Baring Furman Selz LLC, Lazard
Freres & Co. LLC, Tucker Anthony Cleary Gull, Brean Murray & Co., Inc. and
The Buckingham Research Group Incorporated (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended
July 4, 1999). |
- 95 -
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
4.3 |
Indenture
dated as of November 22, 2004, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Jones
Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., Nine West
Footwear Corporation and Jones Retail Corporation, as Issuers and SunTrust
Bank, as Trustee, including Form of 4.250% Senior Notes due 2009, Form of
5.125% Senior Notes due 2014 and Form of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). |
4.4 |
Form of Exchange and Note
Registration Rights Agreement dated November 22, 2004 among Jones Apparel
Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Jones Apparel Group USA,
Inc., Nine West Footwear Corporation and Jones Retail Corporation, and
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as
Representatives of the Several Initial Purchasers listed in Schedule I
thereto, with respect to 4.250% Senior Notes due 2009, 5.125% Senior Notes
due 2014 and 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.15 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004). |
4.5 |
First
Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 31, 2006, by and among Jones
Apparel Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Jones Apparel Group
USA, Inc., Nine West Footwear Corporation, Jones Retail Corporation, Kasper,
Ltd., as Issuers, and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor in
interest to SunTrust Bank), as Trustee, relating to the 4.250% Senior Notes
Due 2009, 5.125% Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006). |
10.1 |
1991 Stock Option Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of our Registration Statement on
Form S-1 filed on April 3, 1991 (Registration No. 33-39742)).+ |
10.2 |
1996 Stock
Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996).+ |
10.3 |
1999 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).+ |
10.4 |
Form of
Agreement Evidencing Stock Option Awards Under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).+ |
10.5 |
Form of Agreement Evidencing
Restricted Stock Awards Under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended April 2, 2005).+ |
10.6 |
Employment Agreement dated as of
July 1, 2000, between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Sidney Kimmel
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the nine months ended October 1, 2000).+ |
10.7 |
Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement dated March 11, 2002, between Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 6,
2002).+ |
10.8 |
Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement dated April 4, 2002, between Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. and Ira M. Dansky (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of
our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 6,
2002).+ |
10.9 |
Buying Agency Agreement dated August 31, 2001, between Nine
West Group Inc. and Bentley HSTE Far East Services Limited (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine
months ended October 6, 2001). |
10.10 |
Buying Agency Agreement dated
November 30, 2001, between Nine West Group Inc. and Bentley HSTE Far East
Services, Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001). |
- 96 -
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
10.11 |
Amendment dated February 28, 2003 to the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).+ |
10.12 |
Amendment dated February 28, 2003 to the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Ira M. Dansky
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).+ |
10.13 |
Amendment No. 2 dated March 8, 2006 to Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated March 8, 2006).+ |
10.14* |
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors, as amended and restated.+ |
10.15 |
Form of Agreement Evidencing
Restricted Stock Awards for Outside Directors Under the 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 2, 2005).+ |
10.16 |
Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of
June 15, 2004, by and among Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional
Obligors referred to therein, the Lenders referred to therein, Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers
and Joint Bookrunners, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent, Citibank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Syndication
Agents, and Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC and Suntrust Bank as
Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended July 3, 2004). |
10.17 |
Amendment to the Amended and
Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of November 17, 2004 among
Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors referred to therein,
the Lenders referred to therein and Wachovia Bank, National Association as
agent for the Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). |
10.18 |
Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of
May 16, 2005, by and among Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional
Obligors referred to therein, the Lenders referred to therein, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Co-Lead Arrangers and
Joint Bookrunners, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative
Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank and Citibank, N.A., as Syndication Agents, and
Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC and Suntrust Bank as Documentation
Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005). |
10.19 |
Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.32 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004).+ |
10.20 |
Amendment No. 3 dated April 17,
2007 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 17, 2007).+ |
10.21 |
Summary Sheet
of Compensation of Non-Management Directors of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 5, 2008).+ |
10.22 |
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Severance Plan, as amended, and Summary Plan Description (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended October 4, 2008).+ |
10.23 |
Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. 2007 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Annex C of our Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders).+ |
- 97 -
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
10.24 |
Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 22, 2007 among Jones
Apparel Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Barneys New York,
Inc., Istithmar Bentley Holding Co. and Istithmar Bentley Acquisition Co.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated June 22, 2007). |
10.25 |
Amendment No.
4 dated July 12, 2007 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2007).+ |
10.26 |
Employment Agreement dated as of July 11, 2007 between Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. and John T. McClain (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2007).+ |
10.27 |
Letter Amendment and Waiver dated July 27, 2007, by and among
Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors referred to therein,
the Lenders referred to therein, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2007). |
10.28 |
Letter
Amendment and Waiver dated July 27, 2007, by and among Jones Apparel Group
USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors referred to therein, the Lenders referred
to therein, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative
Agent. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on
Form 8-K dated July 27, 2007). |
10.29 |
Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 8,
2007 among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc.,
Barneys New York, Inc., Istithmar Bentley Holding Co. and Istithmar Bentley
Acquisition Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current
Report on Form 8-K dated August 8, 2007). |
10.30 |
Master
Confirmation dated September 6, 2007 between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and
Goldman, Sachs & Co. relating to accelerated stock repurchase agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated September 6, 2007). |
10.31 |
Supplemental Confirmation dated September 6, 2007 between
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. relating to accelerated
stock repurchase agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 6, 2007).# |
10.32 |
Amendment No. 2 dated December 10, 2007 to Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Ira M.
Dansky (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).+ |
10.33 |
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 20,
2008 between Nine West Footwear Corporation and Andrew Cohen (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).+ |
10.34 |
Amendment No. 3 dated as of June 6, 2008 to the Amended and
Restated Five- Year Credit Agreement dated as of June 15, 2004 by and among
Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors referred to therein,
the Lenders referred to therein and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
agent for the Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 5, 2008). |
10.35 |
Amendment No. 2 dated as of June 6, 2008 to the Amended and
Restated Five- Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 16, 2005 by and among
Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors referred to therein,
the Lenders referred to therein and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
agent for the Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 5, 2008). |
10.36 |
Amendment No. 3 dated as of January 5, 2009 to the Amended
and Restated Five- Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 16, 2005 by and
among Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors referred to
therein, the Lenders referred to therein and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as agent for the Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 24, 2008). |
- 98 -
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
10.37 |
Security Agreement dated as of January 5, 2009 by and among
Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the other Grantors referred to therein and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 24, 2008). |
10.38* |
Assumption Agreement dated as of January 20, 2009 by and
among Energie Knitwear, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Canada, LP, Jones Canada,
Inc., Jones Apparel Group Canada ULC, Jones Investment Co. Inc., Jones
Jeanswear Group, Inc., L.E.I. Group, Inc., Nine West Development
Corporation, Victoria + Co. Ltd and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent. |
12* |
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
21* |
List of
Subsidiaries.
|
23* |
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP.
|
31* |
Certifications
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32o |
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
____________________
1 Exhibits filed with Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K or
Schedule 14A of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. were filed under SEC File No.
001-10746.
* Filed herewith.
o Furnished herewith.
# Portions deleted pursuant to application for
confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
+ Management
contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
- 99 -
|
BDO Seidman, LLP
Accountants and Consultants |
100 Park Ave
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: (212) 885-8000
Fax: (212) 697-1299 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
New York, New York
The audits referred to in our report dated February 12, 2009 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Jones Apparel Group, Inc., which is contained in
Item 8 of this Form 10-K also included the audit of the financial statement
schedule listed in the accompanying index. This financial statement schedule is
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
New York, New York
February 12, 2009
- 100 -
SCHEDULE II
JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2007 AND 2008
(In Millions)
Column A
|
Column B
|
Column C
|
Column D
|
Column E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
beginning of period
|
Charged
against revenues or to costs and expenses
|
Charged to
other accounts
|
Deductions
|
Balance at
end of period
|
Accounts receivable
allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
year ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
2007
2008 |
$
5.1
2.5
2.0 |
$
(0.8)
0.2
10.3 |
$
-
-
(0.1)
|
(2) |
$
1.8
0.7
9.4
|
(1)
(1)
(1) |
$
2.5
2.0
2.8 |
|
Allowance
for sales returns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
year ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
2007
2008 |
6.4
6.8
7.8
|
28.9
27.4
31.9
|
(0.5)
0.3
(0.4) |
(2)
(2)
(2)
|
28.0
26.7
31.3 |
(3)
(3)
(3)
|
6.8
7.8
8.0 |
|
Allowance for sales
discounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
2007
2008 |
14.6
11.3
9.3
|
107.6
90.0
84.1
|
-
-
- |
|
110.9
92.0
85.4 |
(3)
(3)
(3)
|
11.3
9.3
8.0
|
|
Allowance for co-op
advertising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
2007
2008 |
10.8
10.0
9.4
|
23.2
25.7
26.2
|
(0.2)
0.1
(0.2) |
(2)
(2)
(2)
|
23.8
26.4
26.8
|
(3)
(3)
(3) |
10.0
9.4
8.6
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
year ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
2007
2008 |
9.2
112.4
5.2
|
112.4
1.2
-
|
-
-
- |
|
9.2
108.4
- |
(4)
(4)
|
112.4
5.2
5.2
|
_________________________
(1) |
Doubtful accounts written off against
accounts receivable. |
(2) |
Represents effects of foreign currency
translation. |
(3) |
Deductions taken by customers written off against accounts
receivable. |
(4) |
Deferred tax asset written off
against the deferred tax valuation allowance. |
- 101 -