Form 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________
FORM 10-K
(Mark One) |
[X] |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______ |
Commission file number 1-10746
JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
06-0935166
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
1411 Broadway
New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices) |
10018
(Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212)
642-3860
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, $0.01 par value |
Name of each exchange
on which registered
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section
15(d) of the Act. [ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes
[ ] No
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[X]
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large
accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [X] |
Accelerated filer [ ] |
Non-accelerated filer [ ] |
Smaller reporting company [ ] |
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). [ ] Yes [X] No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant's most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing price of the
registrant's common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite
tape on July 7, 2007, was approximately $3,069,096,847.
As of February 21,
2008, 86,578,939 shares of the registrant's common stock were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The documents incorporated by reference into this Form
10-K and the Parts hereof into which such documents are incorporated are listed
below:
Document
|
Part
|
Those portions of the registrant's proxy
statement for the registrant's 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
"Proxy Statement") that are specifically identified herein as
incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. |
III |
|
- 2 -
DEFINITIONS
As used in this Report, unless the
context requires otherwise, "our," "us" and "we"
means Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and consolidated subsidiaries, "Sun"
means Sun Apparel, Inc., "Nine West Group" means Nine West Group Inc.,
"Nine West" means Nine West Footwear Corporation, "Victoria"
means Victoria + Co Ltd.," McNaughton" means McNaughton Apparel Group
Inc., "Gloria Vanderbilt" means Gloria Vanderbilt Apparel Corp.,
"l.e.i." means R.S.V. Sport, Inc. and its related companies,
"Kasper" means Kasper, Ltd., "Maxwell" means Maxwell Shoe
Company Inc., "Barneys" means Barneys New York, Inc., "FASB"
means the Financial Accounting Standards Board, "SFAS" means Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards and "SEC" means the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING DISCLOSURE
This Report includes, and
incorporates by reference, "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements
regarding our expected financial position, business and financing plans are
forward-looking statements. The words "believes," "expects,"
"plans," "intends," "anticipates" and similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements also
include representations of our expectations or beliefs concerning future events
that involve risks and uncertainties, including:
- those associated with the effect of national and regional economic
conditions;
- lowered levels of consumer spending resulting from a general economic
downturn or lower levels of consumer confidence;
- the performance of our products within the prevailing retail
environment;
- customer acceptance of both new designs and newly-introduced product
lines;
- our reliance on a few department store groups for large portions of our
business;
- consolidation of our retail customers;
- financial difficulties encountered by our customers;
- the effects of vigorous competition in the markets in which we operate;
- our ability to attract and retain qualified executives and other key
personnel;
- our reliance on independent foreign manufacturers;
- changes in the costs of raw materials, labor, advertising and
transportation;
- the general inability to obtain higher wholesale prices for our products
that we have experienced for many years;
- the uncertainties of sourcing associated with an environment in
which general quota has expired on apparel products (while China has
agreed to safeguard quota on certain classes of apparel products through
2008, political pressure will likely continue for restraint on importation
of apparel);
- our ability to successfully implement new operational and financial
computer systems; and
- our ability to secure and protect trademarks and other intellectual
property rights.
All statements other than
statements of historical facts included in this Report, including, without
limitation, the statements under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations," are forward-looking
statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, such expectations may prove to be
incorrect. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our expectations ("Cautionary Statements") are
disclosed in this Report in conjunction with the forward-looking statements. All
subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or
persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
Cautionary Statements. We do not undertake to publicly update or revise our
forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
WEBSITE ACCESS TO COMPANY REPORTS
Copies of our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to these reports) are available free of
charge on our investor relations website at www.jny.com on the same day they are
electronically filed with the SEC.
- 3 -
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. is a
leading designer, marketer and wholesaler of branded apparel, footwear and
accessories. We also market directly to consumers through our chain of specialty
retail and value-based stores. Our nationally recognized brands include Jones
New York, Nine West, Anne Klein, Gloria Vanderbilt, Kasper, Bandolino, Easy
Spirit, Evan-Picone, l.e.i., Energie, Enzo Angiolini, Joan & David, Mootsies
Tootsies, Sam & Libby, Napier, Judith Jack and Le Suit. We also
market costume jewelry under the Givenchy brand licensed from Givenchy
Corporation and footwear under the Dockers Women brand licensed from Levi
Strauss & Co. Each brand is differentiated by its own distinctive styling,
pricing strategy, distribution channel and target consumer. We contract for the
manufacture of our products through a worldwide network of quality
manufacturers. We have capitalized on our nationally known brand names by
entering into various licenses for several of our trademarks, including Jones
New York, Evan-Picone, Anne Klein New York, Nine West, Gloria Vanderbilt and
l.e.i., with select manufacturers of women's and men's products which
we do not manufacture. For more than 30 years, we have built a reputation for
excellence in product quality and value and in operational execution.
Sale of Barneys
On September 6, 2007, we completed
the sale of Barneys to an affiliate of Istithmar PJSC, a Dubai-based private
equity and alternative investment house ("Istithmar"). We received
$937.4 million of cash (net of working capital adjustments) and paid an
aggregate of $54.5 million in cash as of December 31, 2007 for bonuses for key
Barneys employees, compensation for restricted stock held by certain employees
of Barneys that was forfeited upon the completion of the sale and other fees and
costs related to the sale. Net cash proceeds, after estimated taxes expected to
be paid, are expected to amount to approximately $840.0 million. This
transaction did not result in a default under, nor an obligation to redeem or
repurchase, any of our senior notes.
Operating Segments
Our operations are comprised of
four reportable segments: wholesale better apparel, wholesale moderate apparel,
wholesale footwear and accessories, and retail. We identify operating segments
based on, among other things, the way our management organizes the components of
our business for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.
Segment revenues are generated from the sale of apparel, footwear and
accessories through wholesale channels and our own retail locations. See
"Business Segment and Geographic Area Information" in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Wholesale Better Apparel
Our brands cover a broad array of
categories for the women's markets. Within those brands, various product
classifications include career and casual sportswear, jeanswear, dresses, suits,
and a combination of all components termed lifestyle collection. Career and
casual sportswear are marketed as individual items or groups of skirts, pants,
shorts, jackets, blouses, sweaters and related accessories which, while sold as
separates, are coordinated as to styles, color schemes and fabrics, and are
designed to be worn together. New collections are introduced in the four
principal selling seasons - Spring, Summer, Fall and Holiday. Each season is
comprised of a series of individual items or groups which have systematically
spaced shipment dates to ensure a fresh flow of goods to the retail floor. In
addition, certain brands offer key item styles, which are less seasonal in
nature, on a replenishment basis (which ship generally within three to five days
from receipt of order).
- 4 -
The following table summarizes
selected aspects of the products sold under both our brands and licensed brands:
Group
|
Category
|
Products
|
Label
|
Product
Classification
|
Retail
Price
Points
|
Jones
New
York
|
Better |
Skirts,
blouses, pants, jackets, sweaters, jeanswear, suits, dresses, casual tops,
outerwear, shorts |
Jones New York
Jones New York Signature
Jones New York Sport
Jones Jeans
Jones New York Dress
Jones New York Suit
Jones Wear
|
Career
Lifestyle
Lifestyle
Lifestyle
Dresses
Suits
Dresses, Suits |
$29 -
$526
$20 - $371
$13 - $190
$39 - $129
$59 - $396
$69 - $340
$70 - $250 |
Nine
West
|
Better
|
Skirts, blouses,
pants,
jackets, sweaters, suits, dresses, outerwear, shorts, casual tops
|
Nine West
Nine West Dress
Nine West Suits |
Lifestyle
Dresses
Suits |
$19 -
$360
$99 - $276
$217 - $320 |
Anne
Klein
|
Bridge |
Skirts, blouses, pants,
jackets, sweaters, dresses |
Anne Klein New York |
Career |
$75
- $1,203 |
Anne
Klein
|
Better |
Skirts,
blouses, pants, jackets, sweaters, vests, dresses, casual tops |
AK
Anne Klein
AK Sport
Anne Klein Dress
Anne Klein Suit |
Career
Lifestyle
Dresses
Suits |
$32
- $426
$14 - $89
$120 - $298
$45 - $600 |
Other |
Bridge |
Suits |
Albert
Nipon |
Suits |
$120
- $620 |
Other |
Better |
Skirts,
blouses, pants,
jackets, sweaters,
suits, dresses |
Kasper
Evan-Picone
Le Suit |
Suits, Dresses, Sportswear
Dresses,
Suits
Suits, Sportswear |
$20
- - $320
$79
- - $250
$169
- - $280 |
Wholesale Moderate Apparel
Our brands cover a broad array of
categories for the women's, juniors and girls markets. Within those brands,
various product classifications include career and casual sportswear, jeanswear,
dresses, suits, and a combination of all components termed lifestyle collection.
Career and casual sportswear are marketed as individual items or groups of
skirts, pants, shorts, jackets, blouses, sweaters and related accessories which,
while sold as separates, are coordinated as to styles, color schemes and
fabrics, and are designed to be worn together. New collections are introduced in
the four principal selling seasons - Spring, Summer, Fall and Holiday. Each
season is comprised of a series of individual items or groups which have
scheduled shipment dates to ensure a fresh flow of goods to the retail floor. In
addition, certain brands offer key item styles, which are less seasonal in
nature, on a replenishment basis (which ship generally within five days from
receipt of order).
Our continued strategic
operational reviews and efforts to improve profitability and the continued trend
of our moderate customers towards differentiated product offerings led us to
make the strategic decision to exit or significantly reduce the scale of some of
our moderate product lines during 2007. We believe that exiting or reducing
these product lines will strengthen our future operating results and allow us to
focus primarily on growth opportunities in our remaining wholesale product
lines, which have strong fundamentals and operate at substantially higher
margins. This decision will not impact in any way our denim and junior division
labels such as Gloria Vanderbilt, l.e.i., Energie, Jeanstar, Grane and
others.
The following table summarizes
selected aspects of the products sold under our brands:
- 5 -
Group
|
Products
|
Label
|
Product
Classification
|
Retail
Price
Points
|
Jones
New
York
|
Skirts, blouses,
jackets, sweaters,
casual tops |
Jones Wear
Jones Wear Studio
Jones & Co. |
Collection Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear |
$24 -
$119 |
Gloria
Vanderbilt
|
Skirts, blouses, shorts,
jackets, sweaters,
jeanswear, capris,
casual tops |
Gloria Vanderbilt |
Casual Sportswear |
$13
- $48 |
Other
|
Skirts, blouses, pants,
jackets, sweaters,
jeanswear, dresses,
casual tops and bottoms |
Evan-Picone
Energie
Erika
l.e.i.
Jeanstar
A|Line
Pappagallo
GLO/GLO Girls
Grane |
Lifestyle
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear
Casual Sportswear |
$8
- - $219 |
In addition to the products sold
under these brands, we provide design and manufacturing resources to certain
retailers to develop moderately-priced product lines to be sold under private
labels.
Wholesale Footwear and Accessories
Our wholesale footwear and
accessories operations include the sale of both brand name and private label
footwear, handbags, small leather goods and costume, semi-precious, sterling
silver, and marcasite jewelry. The following table summarizes selected aspects
of the products sold under both our brands and licensed brands:
Footwear |
|
|
|
Retail
Price Points
|
Category
|
Label
|
Product
Classification
|
Shoes
|
Boots
|
Bridge |
Joan & David
Anne Klein New York |
Sophisticated
Classics
Modern Classics |
$165 -
$295
$145 - $355 |
---
$225 - $425 |
Better |
Nine West
Nine West Kids
Enzo Angiolini
AK Anne Klein
Circa Joan & David
Boutique 9 |
Contemporary
Children's
Sophisticated Classics
Modern Classics
Sophisticated Classics
Contemporary |
$30 -
$99
$39 -$45
$60 - $125
$69 - $89
$89 - $110
$80 - $140 |
$69 -
$225
$45
$120 - $250
$89 - $189
$149 - $225
$140 - $275 |
Upper
Moderate |
Bandolino
Easy Spirit |
Modern Classics
Comfort/Fit,
Active,
Sport/Casuals |
$59 - $79
$59 - $85 |
$79 -
$169
$85 - $139 |
Moderate |
Nine & Company
Mootsies Tootsies
Mootsies Tootsies Kids
Sam & Libby
Sam
& Libby Kids
Dockers Women |
Contemporary
Lifestyle
Children's
Contemporary
Children's
Lifestyle |
$50 -
$55
$40 - $45
$25 - $29
$30 - $55
$20 - $35
$50 - $55 |
$55 -
$75
$60
---
$60
$39
$70 |
- 6 -
Accessories
|
Category
|
Label
|
Product Classification
|
Retail Price
Points
|
Bridge |
Judith Jack |
Marcasite and Sterling Silver Jewelry |
$50 - $995 |
Better |
AK
Anne Klein
Nine West
Givenchy |
Handbags,
Small Leather Goods
and Costume Jewelry
Handbags,
Small Leather Goods
and Costume Jewelry
Costume and Fashion
Jewelry |
$18 -
$208
$18 - $120
$8 - $795 |
Moderate |
Nine & Company
Napier |
Handbags, Small
Leather Goods and
Costume Jewelry
Costume Jewelry |
$13 -
$48
$15 - $58 |
Retail
We market apparel, footwear and
accessories directly to consumers through our specialty retail stores operating
in malls and urban retail centers and our various value-based
("outlet") stores located in major retail locations. We constantly
evaluate both the opportunities for new locations and the results of
underperforming locations for possible modification or closure.
Specialty Retail Stores. At
December 31, 2007, we operated a total of 396 specialty retail stores. These
stores sell either footwear and accessories or apparel (or a combination of
these products) primarily under their respective brand names. Our Nine West,
Easy Spirit, Enzo Angiolini and Bandolino retail stores offer
selections of exclusive products not marketed to our wholesale customers.
Specialty retail stores may also sell products licensed by us, including belts,
legwear, outerwear, watches and sunglasses.
The following table summarizes
selected aspects of our specialty retail stores at December 31, 2007. Of these
stores, 393 are located within the United States and three are located in
Canada.
|
|
|
Retail Price Range
|
|
Average
store
size (sq. ft.)
|
Store
type
|
Number of
locations
|
Brands
offered
|
Shoes and
Boots
|
Accessories
|
Apparel
|
Type of
locations
|
Nine West |
221 |
Primarily
Nine West |
$49 -$250 |
$5 - $395 |
$24 - $395 |
Upscale and regional malls and urban retail centers |
1,602 |
Easy Spirit |
98 |
Primarily
Easy Spirit |
$14 -
$169 |
$5 -
$120 |
$59 -
$129 |
Upscale and regional malls and
urban retail centers |
1,379 |
Bandolino |
65 |
Primarily
Bandolino |
$39 -
$169 |
$5 -
$69 |
$48 -
$150 |
Urban retail
locations and regional malls |
1,393 |
Anne
Klein New York Accessories |
8 |
Anne
Klein New York |
$145 -
$415 |
$8 -
$1,400 |
$75 -
$1,995 |
Upscale
urban retail
locations and regional malls |
1,496 |
Apparel |
3 |
Various |
--- |
--- |
$6 -
$1,203 |
Urban retail
locations and regional malls |
5,799 |
Enzo
Angiolini |
1 |
Primarily
Enzo Angiolini |
$59
- $250 |
$6
- $190 |
$119 -
$249 |
Upscale
mall |
1,710 |
Outlet Stores. At December
31, 2007, we operated a total of 638 outlet stores. Our shoe stores focus on
breadth of product line, as well as value pricing, and offer a distribution
channel for our residual inventories. The majority of the shoe stores'
merchandise consists of new production of current and proven prior season's
styles, with the remainder of the merchandise consisting of discontinued styles
from our specialty retail footwear stores and wholesale divisions. The apparel
stores focus on breadth of product line and value pricing. In addition to our
brand name merchandise, these stores also sell merchandise produced by our
licensees.
- 7 -
The following table summarizes
selected aspects of our outlet stores at December 31, 2007. Of these stores, 610
are located within the United States and its territories and 28 are located in
Canada.
Store
type
|
Number of
locations
|
Brands
offered
|
Type of
locations
|
Average
store
size (sq. ft.)
|
Nine West |
203 |
Primarily Nine West |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
2,925 |
Jones New York |
174 |
Primarily Jones New
York and
Jones New York Sport |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
3,786 |
Easy Spirit |
118 |
Primarily Easy Spirit |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
3,563 |
Kasper |
82 |
Primarily Kasper |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
2,628 |
Anne Klein |
61 |
Primarily Anne Klein |
Manufacturer
outlet centers |
2,656 |
Licensed Brands
We have an exclusive license to
produce, market and distribute costume jewelry in the United States, Canada,
Mexico and Japan under the Givenchy trademark pursuant to an agreement
with Givenchy, which expires on December 31, 2008. The agreement provides for
the payment by us of a percentage of net sales against guaranteed minimum
royalty and advertising payments as set forth in the agreement.
We have an exclusive license to
produce and sell women's footwear under the Dockers Women trademark in
the United States (including its territories and possessions) pursuant to an
agreement with Levi Strauss & Co. The agreement, which expires on December
31, 2008, provides for the payment by us of a percentage of net sales against
guaranteed minimum royalty and advertising payments as set forth in the
agreement.
Design
Our apparel product lines have
design teams that are responsible for the creation, development and coordination
of the product group offerings within each line. We believe our design staff is
recognized for its distinctive styling of garments and its ability to update
fashion classics with contemporary trends. Our apparel designers travel
throughout the world for fabrics and colors, and stay continuously abreast of
the latest fashion trends. In addition, we actively monitor the retail sales of
our products to determine and react to changes in consumer trends.
For most sportswear lines, we will
develop several groups in a season. A group typically consists of an assortment
of skirts, pants, jeans, shorts, jackets, blouses, sweaters, t-shirts and
various accessories. We believe that we are able to reduce design risks because
we often will not have started cutting fabrics until the first few weeks of a
major selling season. Since different styles within a group often use the same
fabric, we can redistribute styles and, in some cases, colors, to fit current
market demand. We also have a key item replenishment program for certain lines
which consists of core products that reflect little variation from season to
season.
Our footwear and accessories
product lines are developed by a combination of our own design teams and
third-party designers, which independently interpret global lifestyle, clothing,
footwear and accessories trends. To research and confirm such trends, the teams
travel extensively in Asia, Europe and major American markets, conduct extensive
market research on retailer and consumer preferences, and subscribe to fashion
and color information services. Each team presents styles that maintain each
brand's distinct personality. Samples are refined and then produced. After the
samples are evaluated, lines are modified further for presentation at each
season's shoe shows and accessory markets.
- 8 -
Our jewelry brands are developed
by separate design teams. Each team presents styles that maintain each brand's
distinct personality. A prototype is developed for each new product where
appropriate. Most prototypes are produced by our contractors based on technical
drawings that we supply. These prototypes are reviewed by our product
development team, who negotiate costs with the contractors. After samples are
evaluated and cost estimates are received, the lines are modified as needed for
presentation for each selling season.
In accordance with standard
industry practices for licensed products, we have the right to approve the
concepts and designs of all products produced and distributed by our licensees.
Similarly, Givenchy and Levi Strauss & Co. also provide design services to
us for our licensed products and have the right to approve our designs for the Givenchy
and Dockers Women product lines, respectively.
Manufacturing and Quality Control
Apparel
Apparel sold by us is produced in
accordance with our design, specification and production schedules through an
extensive network of independent factories located throughout the
world, primarily in Asia. Nearly all our apparel products were manufactured
outside North America during 2007. We source a portion of our products in
Central and South America, enabling us to take advantage of shorter lead times
than other offshore locations due to geographic proximity. Sourcing in this
region enables us to utilize current free-trade agreements, which provide that
certain articles assembled abroad from United States components are exempt from
United States duties on the value of these components.
We believe that outsourcing our
products allows us to maximize production flexibility, while avoiding
significant capital expenditures, work-in-process inventory build-ups and costs
of managing a larger production work force. Our fashion designers, production
staff and quality control personnel closely examine garments manufactured by
contractors to ensure that they meet our high standards.
Our comprehensive quality control
program is designed to ensure that raw materials and finished goods meet our
exacting standards. Fabrics for garments manufactured are inspected by either
independent inspection services or by our contractors upon receipt in their
warehouses. Our quality control program includes inspection of both prototypes
of each garment prior to cutting by the contractors and a sampling of production
garments upon receipt at our warehouse facilities to ensure compliance with our
specifications.
Our foreign manufacturers'
operations are monitored by our Hong Kong-based personnel, buying agents located
in other countries and independent contractors and inspection services. Finished
goods are generally shipped to our warehouses for final inspection and
distribution.
For our sportswear business, we
occasionally supply the raw materials to our manufacturers. Otherwise, the raw
materials are purchased directly by the manufacturer in accordance with our
specifications. Raw materials, which are in most instances made and/or colored
especially for us, consist principally of piece goods and yarn and are purchased
by us from a number of domestic and foreign textile mills and converters. Our
foreign finished goods purchases are generally purchased on a letter of credit
basis, while our domestic purchases are generally purchased on open account.
Our primary raw material in our
jeanswear business is denim, which is primarily purchased from leading mills
located in the Pacific Rim and Pakistan. Denim purchase commitments and prices
are negotiated on a quarterly or semi-annual basis. We perform our own extensive
testing of denim, cotton twill and other fabrics to ensure consistency and
durability.
We do not have long-term
arrangements with any of our suppliers. We have experienced little difficulty in
satisfying our raw material requirements and consider our sources of supply
adequate. Our products have historically been purchased from foreign
manufacturers in pre-set United States dollar prices. To date, we generally have
not been materially adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates.
However, the recent substantial decline of the United States dollar against
major world currencies and higher labor costs being
- 9 -
experienced by some of our
foreign manufacturers, primarily in China, could cause our manufacturing costs
to rise.
Our apparel products are
manufactured according to plans prepared each year which reflect prior years'
experience, current fashion trends, economic conditions and management estimates
of a line's performance. We generally order piece goods concurrently with
concept development. The purchase of piece goods is controlled and coordinated
on a divisional basis. When possible, we limit our exposure to specific colors
and fabrics by committing to purchase only a portion of total projected demand
with options to purchase additional volume if demand meets the plan.
We believe our extensive
experience in logistics and production management underlies our success in
coordinating with contractors who manufacture different garments included within
the same product group. We also contract for the production of a portion of our
products through a network of foreign agents. We have had long-term mutually
satisfactory business relationships with many of our contractors and agents but
do not have long-term written agreements with any of them.
Footwear and Accessories
To provide a steady source of
inventory, we rely on long-standing relationships with footwear manufacturers in
Asia and Brazil, with handbag and small leather goods manufacturers in Asia and
with jewelry manufacturers in Asia. We work through independent buying agents
for footwear and our own offices for accessories and jewelry. Allocation of
production among our manufacturing resources is determined based upon a number
of factors, including manufacturing capabilities, delivery requirements and
pricing.
During 2007, nearly all our
footwear products were manufactured by independent footwear manufacturers
located in Asia (primarily China). We also utilize independent manufacturers
located in Brazil, Europe and North Africa. Our handbags and small leather goods
are sourced through our own buying office in China, which utilizes independent
third party manufacturers located primarily in China. Our products have
historically been purchased from Brazilian and Asian manufacturers in pre-set
United States dollar prices. To date, we generally have not been materially
adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. However, the recent
substantial decline of the United States dollar against major world currencies
and higher labor costs being experienced by some of our foreign manufacturers,
primarily in China, could cause our manufacturing costs to rise. We do not have
contracts with any of our footwear, handbag or small leather goods manufacturers
but, with respect to footwear imported from Brazil and China, we rely on
established relationships with our Brazilian and Chinese manufacturers directly
and through our independent buying agents. For footwear, quality control reviews
are done on-site in the factories by our third-party buying agents primarily to
ensure that material and component qualities and fit of the product are in
accordance with our specifications. For accessories, quality control reviews are
done on-site in the factories by our own locally-based inspection technicians.
Our quality control program includes approval of prototypes, as well as approval
of final production samples to ensure they meet our high standards.
We believe that our relationships
with our Brazilian and Chinese manufacturers provide us with a responsive and
adequate source of supply of our products and, accordingly, give us a
significant competitive advantage. We also believe that purchasing a significant
percentage of our products through independent third-party manufacturers in
China and Brazil allows us to maximize production flexibility while limiting our
capital expenditures, work-in-process inventory and costs of managing a larger
production work force. Because of the sophisticated manufacturing techniques of
footwear manufacturers, individual production lines can be quickly changed from
one style to another, and production of certain styles can be completed in as
few as four hours, from uncut leather to boxed footwear.
We place our projected orders for
each season's styles with our manufacturers prior to the time we have received
all of our customers' orders. Because of our close working relationships with
our third party manufacturers (which allow for flexible production schedules and
production of large quantities of footwear within a short period of time), many
of our orders are finalized only after we have received orders from a majority
of our customers. As a result, we believe that, in comparison to our
competitors, we are better able
- 10 -
to meet sudden demands for particular designs,
more quickly exploit market trends as they occur, reduce inventory risk and more
efficiently fill reorders booked during a particular season.
We do not have contracts with any
of our jewelry manufacturers but rely on long-standing relationships,
principally with third-party Asian manufacturers. We believe that the quality
and cost of products manufactured by our suppliers provide us with the ability
to remain competitive. We also have our own manufacturing facility to satisfy
demand for products manufactured domestically (such as cosmetic containers) and
to provide product samples, prototypes, small quantities of test merchandise and
a small amount of production capacity in the event of a disruption of certain
outsourced manufacturing. We have historically experienced little difficulty in
satisfying finished goods requirements, and we consider our source of supplies
adequate.
During 2007, our jewelry products
were manufactured primarily by independently-owned jewelry manufacturers in
Asia. Sourcing the majority of our products from third-party manufacturers
enables us to better control costs and avoid significant capital expenditures,
work in process inventory, and costs of managing a larger production workforce.
Our products have historically been purchased from Asian manufacturers in
pre-set United States dollar prices. To date, we generally have not been
materially adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. However, the
recent substantial decline of the United States dollar against major world
currencies and higher labor costs being experienced by some of our foreign
manufacturers, primarily in China, could cause our manufacturing costs to rise.
Forecasts for basic jewelry
products are produced on a rolling 12-week basis and are adjusted based on point
of sale information from retailers. Manufacturing of fashion jewelry products is
based on marketing forecasts and sales plans; actual orders are received several
weeks after such forecasts are produced. Quality control testing is performed
on-site by domestic employees or our own locally-based inspection technicians.
Quality assurance checks are also performed upon receipt of finished goods at
our distribution facilities.
Workplace Compliance Program
We have an active program in place
to monitor compliance by our contract manufacturers (in all product categories)
with the Jones Apparel Group Standards for Contractors and Suppliers
("Factory Standards"). In 1996, we became a participant in the United
States Department of Labor's Apparel Manufacturer's Compliance Program
Agreement. Under that agreement, and through independent agreements with
domestic and foreign manufacturers that produce products for us, we regularly
audit for compliance with our Factory Standards and require corrective action
when appropriate.
Our Factory Standards, which we
have posted on our website, apply to conditions of employment, such as child
labor, wages and benefits, working hours and days off, health and safety
conditions in the workplace and housing, forced labor, discrimination,
disciplinary practices and freedom of association.
We have a vigorous
factory-auditing program. During 2007, 1,252 audits were conducted (including
949 by independent auditors), including domestic and foreign factories for
apparel, footwear, handbag and jewelry products. Our Compliance Monitoring staff
consists of 25 members based in four countries. Twenty-two staff members claim
English as a second language, and almost all are multi-lingual and have at least
a bachelor's degree from a four-year institution in the United States or
abroad. In addition to our own staff, we retain several recognized, unaffiliated
workplace compliance audit firms to conduct factory audits on our behalf and to
report on such findings, including recommendations for remediation.
Obtaining compliance with our
Factory Standards is, in many instances, a very challenging process. We deal
with many factories in many countries, each with legal systems and cultures far
different from those of the United States. Our auditing program invariably
reports problems of varying degrees in almost all factories. Our approach, in
virtually all cases, has been to attempt to improve conditions through
directions to remediate the cited conditions and to conduct follow-up audits,
rather than to cease using a given factory, which would assuredly result in
severe hardship for the employees working at those factories. We believe that
progress and improvement, although incremental, is quite real.
- 11 -
Marketing
Our ten largest customer groups,
principally department stores, accounted for approximately 55% of gross revenues
in 2007. Macy's, Inc., our largest customer in 2007, accounted for 20% of our
2007 gross revenues.
We believe that purchasing
decisions are generally made independently by individual department stores
within a commonly controlled group. There has been a trend, however, toward more
centralized purchasing decisions. As such decisions become more centralized, the
risk to us of such concentration increases. Furthermore, we believe a trend
exists among our major customers to concentrate purchasing among a narrowing
group of vendors. In the future, retailers may have financial problems or
continue to consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, or realign
their affiliations, any of which could increase the concentration of our
customers. We attempt to minimize our credit risk from our concentration of
customers by closely monitoring accounts receivable balances and shipping levels
and the ongoing financial performance and credit status of our customers.
We also believe there is an
increasing focus by the department stores to concentrate an increasing portion
of their product assortments within their own private label products. These
private label lines compete directly with our product lines and may receive more
prominent positioning on the retail floor by department stores. While this
creates more competition, we believe that our brands are preferred by the
consumer.
Sportswear products are marketed
to department stores and specialty retailing customers during "market
weeks," which are generally four to six months in advance of the
corresponding industry selling seasons. While we typically will allocate a
six-week period to market a sportswear line, most major orders are written
within the first three weeks of any market period.
We believe retail demand for our
apparel products is enhanced by our ability to provide our retail accounts and
consumers with knowledgeable sales support. In this regard, we have an
established program to place retail sales specialists in many major department
stores for many of our brands, including Jones New York, Jones New
York Sport, Jones New York Signature, Kasper and Anne Klein.
These individuals have been trained by us to support the sale of our products by
educating other store personnel and consumers about our products and by
coordinating our marketing activities with those of the stores. In addition, the
retail sales specialists provide us with firsthand information concerning
consumer reactions to our products. In addition, we have a program of designated
sales personnel in which a store agrees to designate certain sales personnel who
will devote a substantial portion of their time to selling our products in
return for certain benefits.
We introduce new collections of
footwear at industry-wide shoe shows, held semi-annually in both New York City
and Las Vegas. We also present an interim line to customers during the fall and
spring of each year. We introduce new handbag and small leather goods
collections at market shows that occur five times each year in New York City.
Jewelry products are marketed in New York City showrooms through individual
customer appointments and at five industry-wide market shows each year.
Retailers visit our showrooms at these times to view various product lines and
merchandise.
We market our footwear, handbag
and small leather goods businesses with certain department stores and specialty
retail stores by bringing our retail and sales planning expertise to those
retailers. Under this program, members of branded division management who have
extensive retail backgrounds work with the retailer to create a "focus
area" or "concept shop" within the store that displays the full
collection of a single brand in one area. These individuals assist the
department and specialty retail stores by: providing advice about appropriate
product assortment and product flow; making recommendations about when a product
should be re-ordered; providing sales guidance, including the training of store
personnel; and developing advertising programs with the retailer to promote
sales of our products. In addition, our sales force and field merchandising
associates for footwear, handbags and small leather goods recommend how to
display our products, assist with merchandising displays and educate store
personnel about us and our products. The goal of this approach is to promote
high retail sell-throughs of our products. With this approach, customers are
encouraged to devote greater selling space to our products, and we are better
able to assess consumer preferences, the future ordering needs of our customers,
and inventory requirements.
- 12 -
We work closely with our wholesale
jewelry customers to create long-term sales programs, which include choosing
among our diverse product lines and implementing sales programs at the store
level. A team of sales representatives and sales managers monitor product
performance against plan and are responsible for inventory management, using
point-of-sale information to respond to shifts in consumer preferences.
Management uses this information to adjust product mix and inventory
requirements. In addition, field merchandising associates recommend how to
display our products, assist with merchandising displays and educate store
personnel about us and our products. Retailers are also provided with customized
displays and store-level merchandising designed to maximize sales and inventory
turnover. By providing retailers with in-store product management, we establish
close relationships with retailers, allowing us to maximize product sales and
increase floor space allocated to our product lines. We have also placed retail
sales specialists in major department stores to support the sale of our Napier,
Nine West, Givenchy and Judith Jack jewelry products.
Advertising and Promotion
We employ a cooperative
advertising program for our branded products, whereby we share the cost of
certain wholesale customers' advertising and promotional expenses in
newspapers, magazines and other media up to either a preset maximum percentage
of the customer's purchases or an agreed-upon rate of contribution. An
important part of the marketing program includes prominent displays of our
products in wholesale customers' fashion catalogs as well as in-store shop
displays.
We have national advertising
campaigns for the following brands:
- Jones New York Collection and Jones New York Signature
(in fashion and lifestyle magazines),
- Nine West (footwear, apparel, handbags, jewelry and licensed
products, primarily in fashion magazines),
- Bandolino (in fashion magazines),
- l.e.i. (
in junior-focused and fashion magazines and radio),
- Anne Klein New York
(in fashion magazines),
- AK Anne Klein
(in fashion magazines), and
- Grane
(in fashion magazines).
Given the strong recognition and
brand loyalty already afforded our brands, we believe these campaigns will serve
to further enhance and broaden our customer base. Our in-house creative services
departments oversee the conception, production and execution of virtually all
aspects of these activities. We also believe that our retail network promotes
brand name recognition and supports the merchandising of complete lines by, and
the marketing efforts of, our wholesale customers.
Licensing of Company Brands
We have entered into various
license agreements under which independent licensees either manufacture, market
and sell certain products under our trademarks in accordance with designs
furnished or approved by us or distribute our products in certain countries
where we do not do business. These licenses, the terms of which (not including
renewals) expire at various dates through 2011, typically provide for the
payment to us of a percentage of the licensee's net sales of the licensed
products against guaranteed minimum royalty payments, which typically increase
over the term of the agreement.
The following table sets forth
information with respect to select aspects of our licensing business:
- 13 -
Brand
|
Category
|
Jones New York |
Men's
Accessories and Jewelry (U.S., Canada)
Men's Dress Shirts (U.S.)
Men's Neckwear (Canada)
Men's Neckwear (U.S.)
Men's Sportswear, Sweaters, Knit Shirts, Woven Shirts, Finished
Bottom
Slacks and Outerwear (Canada)
Men's Tailored Clothing, Dress Shirts, Outerwear, Dress Slacks
(Canada)
Men's Tailored Clothing, Formal Wear (U.S.)
Men's Topcoats, Outerwear (U.S.)
Men's Umbrellas, Rain Accessories (U.S.)
Men's and Women's Optical Eyewear (U.S., Canada, Argentina, Aruba,
Australia,
Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Benelux, Bolivia,
Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Cyprus, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,
El Salvador, Finland, French
Guiana, Guatemala, Honduras, Ireland, Israel,
Jamaica, Kuwait, Lebanon, Mexico,
Netherlands Antilles, Nicaragua, Norway,
Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines,
South Africa, Suriname, Sweden, Trinidad,
Turkey, Uruguay, Venezuela)
Women's Costume Jewelry (Canada)
Women's Hats (U.S., Canada)
Women's Leather Outerwear (U.S.)
Women's Outerwear, Rainwear (U.S.)
Women's Outerwear, Wool Coats, Rainwear (Canada)
Women's Scarves, Wraps (U.S., Canada)
Women's Sleepwear, Loungewear (U.S., Canada)
Women's Sunglasses (U.S., Canada)
Women's Umbrellas, Rain Accessories (U.S.)
Women's Watches (Canada)
Women's Wool Coats (U.S.)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Women's Apparel,
Handbags, Small
Leather Goods, Footwear, Belts, Sunglasses,
Coats, Scarves, as well as Sleepwear
if such items are made
available in the Territory (China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Macau,
Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand) |
Jones Wear |
Women's Costume Jewelry
(Canada)
Women's Outerwear (Canada)
Women's Watches (Canada)
Women's Optical Eyewear (U.S.) |
Jones
Studio |
Women's
Outerwear, Wool Coats, Rainwear (Canada) |
Jones & Co. |
Women's Outerwear, Wool Coats,
Rainwear (Canada) |
Albert Nipon |
Men's Tailored Clothing (U.S.) |
Kasper |
Men's Tailored Clothing (U.S., Canada, Mexico) |
Evan-Picone |
Men's
Tailored Clothing, Formal Wear, Topcoats (U.S.)
Manufacturing and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Women's Sportswear
(Japan) |
Energie |
Men's Denim and Sportswear
(U.S.)
Boys' Denim and Sportswear (4-6x and 8-20) (U.S.)
Men's Footwear (U.S.) |
Gloria Vanderbilt |
Knit Tops,
Bottoms, ActiveWear, Performance ActiveWear (U.S.)
Sleepwear, Daywear, Loungewear (U.S., Canada)
Infants', Toddlers' and Children's (4-6x) Apparel (U.S., Canada) |
GLO |
Infants', Toddlers' and
Children's (4-6x) Apparel (U.S.) |
GLO Girl |
Infants',
Toddlers' and Children's (4-6x) Apparel (Canada) |
- 14 -
Brand
|
Category
|
Anne Klein New York
and AK Anne Klein
|
Belts (U.S.,
Canada)
Home Sewing Patterns (Worldwide)
Hosiery, Casual Legwear (U.S., Canada)
Outerwear, Wool Coats, Leather Outerwear, Rainwear (U.S.)
Scarves, Cold Weather Accessories, Gloves (U.S., Canada)
Sunglasses, Optical Eyewear (Worldwide)
Swimwear (U.S.)
Watches (Worldwide)
Manufacturing and Wholesale and Retail Distribution Rights for Apparel
(Japan)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Handbags (Japan)
Sublicensed Wholesale and Retail Distribution Rights for Scarves,
Towels,
Jewelry (Japan)
Manufacturing and Wholesale and Retail Distribution Rights for Apparel,
Handbags,
Accessories (Korea)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Apparel and Handbags
(Central America,
South America, Caribbean, Dominican Republic)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Apparel, Small Leather
Goods, Footwear,
Handbags, Belts, Sunglasses, Watches, Jewelry,
Coats, Socks, Scarves, Swimwear,
as well as Sleepwear, Fragrances, and Cosmetics
if such items are made available
in the Territory (China, Hong Kong, Indonesia,
Macau, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan,
Thailand, Italy, France, Spain, United Kingdom,
Portugal, Ireland, Belgium, Luxembourg,
the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia)
Retail Distribution Rights for Apparel, Handbags, Accessories, Belts,
Sleepwear, Casual
Legwear (Philippines) |
Anne Klein Coat |
Outerwear, Wool Coats, Leather
Outerwear, Rainwear (U.S.) |
A|Line |
Sunglasses, Optical Eyewear (U.S.) |
Nine West |
Belts (U.S., Canada)
Casual Legwear (U.S., Canada)
Gloves, Cold Weather Accessories (U.S., Canada)
Hats (U.S., Canada)
Leather, Wool, Casual Outerwear, Rainwear (U.S., Canada, Spain)
Luggage (U.S., Canada)
Optical Eyewear (U.S., Canada, China, Mexico)
Sunglasses (U.S., Canada, Spain)
Retail and Wholesale Distribution Rights for Apparel, Belts, Cold Weather
Accessories,
Hats, Luggage, Sunglasses, Watches, Jewelry,
Coats, Legwear, Scarves, as well
as Sleepwear, Swimwear, Fragrances and Cosmetics
if such items are made available
in the Territory (China, Hong Kong, Indonesia,
Japan, Macau, Malaysia, Philippines,
Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand) |
Nine & Company |
Bed and Bath
Products and Accessories (U.S.)
Belts (U.S.)
Casual Legwear (U.S.)
Gloves, Cold Weather Accessories (U.S.)
Hats (U.S.)
Luggage (U.S.)
Sleepwear, Loungewear (U.S.)
Sunglasses (U.S.)
Watches (U.S.) |
Easy Spirit |
Slippers (U.S., Canada) |
Enzo Angiolini |
Sunglasses (U.S.) |
- 15 -
Brand
|
Category
|
l.e.i. |
Casual Legwear
(U.S.)
Belts (U.S., Canada)
Hats (U.S., Canada)
Juniors' and Girls' Intimate Apparel (U.S.)
Juniors' and Girls' Outerwear (U.S.)
Juniors' and Girls' Sunglasses (U.S., Canada)
Watches (U.S., Canada) |
Joan & David |
Manufacturing and Retail
Distribution Rights for Apparel, Footwear, Handbags (China, Hong
Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Macau, Malaysia,
Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand) |
International
footwear and accessories retail/wholesale distribution |
Nine West
and Enzo Angiolini retail locations (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar,
The United
Arab Emirates, Jordan, India, Poland) and Anne
Klein New York retail locations and
wholesale distribution
rights for Anne Klein New York footwear and accessories (Bahrain,
Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates)
Nine West retail locations (Saudi Arabia,
Lebanon, Egypt)
Nine West retail locations and wholesale
distribution rights for Nine West, Enzo Angiolini,
Bandolino and Easy Spirit footwear and
accessories and AK Anne Klein, Circa Joan & David,
Sam & Libby and Mootsies Tootsies
footwear (Belize, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama,
Venezuela, the Dominican Republic,
French Guiana, Guyana, Suriname, the Caribbean
Islands)
Nine West retail locations and wholesale
distribution rights for Nine West footwear and accessories
(Greece, Cyprus)
Nine West retail
locations and wholesale distribution rights for Nine West footwear
and accessories
(Chile, Peru) and wholesale distribution rights
for Enzo Angiolini footwear and accessories (Chile)
Nine West, Enzo Angiolini, NW Nine West and Easy
Spirit retail locations and wholesale distribution
rights for Nine West, Enzo Angiolini, NW Nine
West and Easy Spirit footwear and accessories
(Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Macau,
Malaysia, the People's Republic of China, the
Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand)
Nine West retail
locations and wholesale distribution rights for Nine West footwear
and accessories
(South Africa)
Nine West, Enzo Angiolini and Westies
retail locations, wholesale distribution rights for Nine West
footwear and accessories and Enzo
Angiolini, Westies and AK Anne Klein footwear, and
manufacturing rights for Westies footwear
(Mexico)
Nine West and Enzo Angiolini retail
locations (Turkey, Romania)
Nine West and Easy Spirit retail
locations and wholesale distribution rights for Nine West and Easy
Spirit footwear and accessories (Israel)
Nine West, Bandolino and Easy Spirit
retail locations, wholesale distribution rights for Nine West,
Enzo Angiolini, Easy Spirit, Bandolino, Nine
& Company and Westies footwear and accessories
and AK Anne Klein, Circa Joan & David, Sam
& Libby and Mootsies Tootsies footwear (Canada)
Nine West retail locations (the United Kingdom,
Ireland, the Channel Islands, Denmark, the
Netherlands) and wholesale distribution rights
for Nine West and NW Nine West footwear and
accessories and Easy Spirit footwear (the
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Channel Islands, Norway,
Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, Belgium, the
Netherlands, Luxembourg)
Nine West retail
locations and wholesale distribution rights for Nine West and Enzo
Angiolini footwear
and accessories (Spain, Portugal)
Nine West retail
locations (Russia)
Nine West retail locations (France)
Nine West and Enzo Angiolini retail
locations and wholesale distribution rights for Nine West and
Enzo Angiolini footwear and accessories
(Australia, New Zealand)
Wholesale distribution rights for Nine West and Napier
costume jewelry (Canada) |
- 16 -
Trademarks
We utilize a variety of trademarks
which we own, including Jones New York, Jones New York Signature, Jones New
York Sport, Jones New York Jeans, Jones Wear, Evan-Picone, Erika, Energie, Nine
West, Easy Spirit, Enzo Angiolini, Bandolino, Nine & Company, Westies,
Pappagallo, Joan & David, Mootsies Tootsies, Sam & Libby, Napier, Judith
Jack, Gloria Vanderbilt, GLO, l.e.i., Anne Klein, Anne Klein New York, AK Anne
Klein, A|Line, Kasper, Le Suit, Grane, Boutique 9 and Jeanstar. We
have registered or applied for registration for these and other trademarks for
use on a variety of items of apparel, footwear, accessories and/or related
products and, in some cases, for retail store services, in the United States and
certain other countries. The expiration dates of the United States trademark
registrations for our material registered trademarks are as follows, with our
other registered foreign and domestic trademarks expiring at various dates
through 2023. Certain brands such as Jones New York are sold under
several related trademarks; in these instances, the range of expiration dates is
provided. All marks are subject to renewal in the ordinary course of business if
no third party successfully challenges such registrations and, in the case of
domestic and certain foreign registrations, applicable use and related filing
requirements for the goods and services covered by such registrations have been
met.
Trademark
|
Expiration
Dates |
|
Trademark
|
Expiration
Dates |
|
Trademark
|
Expiration
Dates |
Jones New York |
2011-2017 |
|
Nine & Company |
2012-2015
|
|
Anne Klein |
2008-2017 |
Jones New York Sport |
2013 |
|
Napier |
2009 |
|
Kasper |
2011 |
Evan-Picone |
2013 |
|
Judith Jack |
2012 |
|
Le Suit |
2008 |
Nine West |
2008-2015 |
|
Erika |
2014 |
|
Joan & David |
2012-2015 |
Easy Spirit |
2008-2017 |
|
Energie |
2015 |
|
Mootsies Tootsies |
2008-2013 |
Enzo Angiolini |
2008-2015 |
|
Gloria Vanderbilt |
2012-2017 |
|
Sam & Libby |
2013 |
Bandolino |
2011-2016
|
|
l.e.i. |
2010-2016 |
|
|
|
We carefully
monitor trademark expiration dates to provide uninterrupted registration of our
material trademarks. We also license the Givenchy and Dockers Women
trademarks (see "Licensed Brands" above).
We also hold numerous patents
expiring at various dates through 2025 (subject to payment of annuities and/or
periodic maintenance fees) and have additional patent applications pending in
the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We regard our trademarks and
other proprietary rights as valuable assets which are critical in the marketing
of our products. We vigorously monitor and protect our trademarks and patents
against infringement and dilution where legally feasible and appropriate.
Imports and Import Restrictions
Our transactions with our foreign
manufacturers and suppliers are subject to the risks of doing business abroad.
Imports into the United States are affected by, among other things, the cost of
transportation and the imposition of import duties and restrictions. The United
States, China, Brazil and other countries in which our products are manufactured
may, from time to time, impose new quotas, duties, tariffs or other
restrictions, or adjust presently prevailing quotas, duty or tariff levels,
which could affect our operations and our ability to import products at current
or increased levels. We cannot predict the likelihood or frequency of any such
events occurring.
Our import operations are subject
to constraints imposed by bilateral textile agreements between the United States
and a number of foreign countries, including Hong Kong, Taiwan, the Philippines,
Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea. In certain cases, these agreements impose
quotas on the amount and type of goods which can be imported into the United
States from these countries. Such agreements also allow the United States to
impose, at any time, restraints on the importation of categories of merchandise
that, under the terms of the agreements, are not subject to specified limits.
Our imported products are also subject to United States customs duties and, in
the ordinary course of business, we are from time to time subject to claims by
the United States Customs Service for duties and other charges.
We monitor duty, tariff and
quota-related developments and continually seek to minimize our potential
exposure to quota-related risks through, among other measures, geographical
diversification of our
- 17 -
manufacturing sources, the maintenance of overseas offices, allocation of
overseas production to merchandise categories where more quota is available and
shifts of production among countries and manufacturers.
Because our foreign manufacturers
are located at greater geographic distances from us than our domestic
manufacturers, we are generally required to allow greater lead time for foreign
orders, which reduces our manufacturing flexibility. Foreign imports are also
affected by the high cost of transportation into the United States and the
effects of fluctuations in the value of the dollar against foreign currencies in
certain countries.
In addition to the factors
outlined above, our future import operations may be adversely affected by
political instability resulting in the disruption of trade from exporting
countries and restrictions on the transfer of funds.
Backlog
We had unfilled customer orders of
approximately $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2007 and December
31, 2006, respectively. These amounts include both confirmed and unconfirmed
orders which we believe, based on industry practice and past experience, will be
confirmed. The amount of unfilled orders at a particular time is affected by a
number of factors, including the mix of product, the timing of the receipt and
processing of customer orders and scheduling of the manufacture and shipping of
the product, which in some instances is dependent on the desires of the
customer. Backlog is also affected by a continuing trend among customers to
reduce the lead time on their orders. Due to these factors, a comparison of
unfilled orders from period to period is not necessarily meaningful and may not
be indicative of eventual actual shipments.
Employees
At December 31, 2007, we had
approximately 8,450 full-time employees. This total includes approximately 3,170
in quality control, production, design and distribution positions, approximately
2,075 in administrative, sales, clerical and office positions and approximately
3,205 in our retail stores. We also employ approximately 5,380 part-time
employees, of which approximately 5,260 work in our retail stores.
Approximately 75 of our employees
located in Vaughan, Ontario are members of the Laundry and Linen Drivers and
Industrial Workers Union, which has a collective bargaining agreement with us
expiring on March 15, 2009. Approximately 30 of our employees located in New
York, New York are members of UNITE HERE, which has a collective bargaining
agreement that expires on May 31, 2010. Approximately 245 of our employees
located in El Paso, Texas are members of UNITE HERE, which has a collective
bargaining agreement that expires on March 9, 2011. We consider our relations
with our employees to be satisfactory.
Jones New York in the Classroom
On May 3, 2005, we announced the
launch of a charitable cause initiative, including the establishment of Jones
New York In The Classroom, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation, with an initial
grant from us of $1 million and a commitment of our continued support. Jones New
York In The Classroom is dedicated to improving the quality of education in
America and inspiring others, both individuals and corporations, to do the same
through support of teachers and vital teacher-based programs in America's
schools. It is focused on four areas of support for teachers: recruitment,
retention, professional development and recognition and support. Our initial
donation was earmarked to support each of the four non-profit organizations
selected by Jones New York In The Classroom to benefit from its programs and
fundraising: TeachersCount, New Teacher Academy, Fund for Teachers and
Adopt-A-Classroom. Each of these organizations addresses one or more of Jones
New York In The Classroom's areas of focus. In 2007, our contributions helped
Jones New York In The Classroom donate additional funds to several of these
non-profit organizations. Those funds were used by Adopt-A-Classroom to renew
classroom adoptions and to develop an online program to reach more teachers and
donors and provide online tools to support local classrooms; by Teachers Count
to develop ten new "Behind Every Famous Person is A Fabulous Teacher"
public service announcements in collaboration with Time, Inc., and to support
nationwide expansion of the PSA campaign; and by Fund for Teachers to support
its award of over 100 grants to teachers within Jones New York In The Classroom's
regions of focus, the New York metropolitan area, Minneapolis, Atlanta, Chicago
and Northern California, to fund educational
- 18 -
and training material for the Fund
for Teachers Asian study program for teachers in the metropolitan New York area, in collaboration with New Visions for Public School, and to
support a classroom "makeover" in Houston, Texas by Fund for Teachers
with Jones New York In The Classroom.
Our commitment since the launch in
2005 has also included support for events to raise public awareness of Jones New
York In The Classroom and its goals for teachers and education, as well as
initiatives to encourage our employees to participate in volunteer opportunities
and fundraising for Jones New York In The Classroom, and the other non-profit
organizations Jones New York In The Classroom is supporting. Our corporate
employees have the opportunity to volunteer up to three hours of paid time off
each month in educational facilities in their local communities, totaling more
than 250,000 hours annually in support of teachers and education. Each of our
business locations is encouraged to raise or budget funds to adopt a classroom
to help with daily classroom needs through Adopt-A-Classroom. Working with our
retail customers, we have supported Jones New York In The Classroom with
in-store marketing programs, including a limited edition t-shirt for 2007
featuring artwork by illustrator Sujean Rim, and a dedicated Jones New York
shopping week during which ten percent of our profits on sales of certain
merchandise (up to $500,000) were donated to Jones New York In The Classroom.
Additional activities we have participated in include assisting Jones New York
In The Classroom in forming a national advisory committee comprised of education
professionals; designing, developing and hosting a website for the charity and
developing car magnets for sale by the charity to raise funds; holding a second
annual charity golf classic to benefit Jones New York In The Classroom; and
joining with Lowe's and Hands On Network for Back to School, Back to Style
teacher and classroom makeovers to raise awareness of Jones New York In The
Classroom and the non-profit organizations it has committed to support. We also
hosted Apple Day, which recognized seven of our associates and one of our cause
committees for their outstanding leadership and volunteerism on behalf of the
cause initiative and Jones New York In The Classroom.
Strategic Review of Operations
In mid-2005, we completed a
strategic review of our operating infrastructure and general and administrative
support areas to improve profitability and to ensure we are properly positioned
for the long-term benefit of our shareholders. By proactively reviewing our
infrastructure, systems and operating processes at a time when the industry is
undergoing consolidation and change, we plan to eliminate redundancies and
improve our overall cost structure and margin performance.
Supply Chain Management
- We have implemented and continue to enhance a product development
management system.
- We are now utilizing the capabilities of our third-party manufacturers
to increase pre-production product development activities directly with
them.
- We selected SAP Apparel and Footwear Solution as our enterprise resource
planning system, which has been implemented in the majority of our apparel
operations and will ultimately be implemented company-wide.
- The logistics network has been analyzed to reduce costs and increase
efficiency by following a tiered approach of (i) multiple product usage of
existing distribution centers, (ii) utilizing third party logistics
providers, and (iii) ultimately direct shipping from factory to customer.
We have closed four distribution centers since 2005 as a result of these
efforts and other restructuring actions, with one additional distribution
center scheduled to close in 2008.
- In response to the elimination of apparel quotas and other trade
safeguards, we have been consolidating our third-party manufacturing to a
more concentrated vendor matrix.
General and Administrative Areas
- We are implementing best practices in connection with the migration of our
current systems to the SAP Apparel and Footwear Solution platform.
The implementation and execution
of the initiatives, other than the company-wide implementation of SAP, were
substantially completed by the end of 2007. We have reduced annual costs by
approximately $100 million over the period. Total costs (including capital
expenditures, severance costs and fees) for our strategic
- 19 -
review and the related
initiatives are expected to be approximately $120 million. As of December 31,
2007, we have spent a total of $117.5 million.
While customer consolidation,
other restructurings and the difficult retail climate have served to offset much
of the impact of these cost reductions, we are now in an excellent position to
benefit from these initiatives as we move forward.
Recent Restructurings
Our continued strategic
operational reviews and efforts to improve profitability and the continued trend
of our moderate customers towards differentiated product offerings led us to
make the strategic decision to exit or significantly reduce the scale of some of
our moderate apparel product lines during 2007. In connection with the exit and
reorganization of certain moderate apparel product lines, we decided to close
certain New York offices, and on October 9, 2007, we announced the closing of
warehouse facilities in Goose Creek, South Carolina. We expect to incur $8.0
million of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for
approximately 440 employees. Of this amount, $7.9 million was recorded in 2007
and the remaining $0.1 million will be recorded in 2008. These closings were
substantially complete by the end of February 2008.
On October 17, 2007, we announced
the closing of warehouse facilities in Edison, New Jersey. We expect to incur
$3.5 million of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for
approximately 160 employees. Of this amount, $2.8 million was recorded in 2007,
and the remaining $0.7 will be recorded in 2008. The closing will be
substantially complete by the end of June 2008.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially
from those anticipated. Risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect us
include, without limitation, the following factors.
The apparel, footwear and
accessories industries are highly competitive. Any increased competition could
result in reduced sales or prices, or both, which could have a material adverse
effect on us.
Apparel, footwear and accessories
companies face competition on many fronts, including the following:
- establishing and maintaining favorable brand recognition;
- developing products that appeal to consumers;
- pricing products appropriately; and
- obtaining access to retail outlets and sufficient floor space.
There is intense competition in
the sectors of the apparel, footwear and accessories industries in which we
participate. We compete with many other manufacturers and retailers, some of
which are larger and have greater resources than we do. Any increased
competition could result in reduced sales or prices, or both, which could have a
material adverse effect on us.
We compete primarily on the basis
of fashion, price and quality. We believe our competitive advantages include our
ability to anticipate and respond quickly to changing consumer demands, our
brand names and range of products and our ability to operate within the
industries' production and delivery constraints. Furthermore, our established
brand names and relationships with retailers have resulted in a loyal following
of customers.
We believe that, during the past
few years, major department stores and specialty retailers have been
increasingly sourcing products from suppliers who are well capitalized or have
established reputations for delivering quality merchandise in a timely manner.
However, there can be no assurance that significant new competitors will not
develop in the future.
- 20 -
We also believe there is an
increasing focus by the department stores to concentrate an increasing portion
of their product assortments within their own private label products. These
private label lines compete directly with our product lines and may receive
prominent positioning on the retail floor by department stores. While this creates more competition, our independent studies indicate
that our brands are preferred by the consumer.
We may not be able to respond
to changing fashion and retail trends in a timely manner, which could have a
material adverse effect on us.
The apparel, footwear and
accessories industries have historically been subject to rapidly changing
fashion trends and consumer preferences. We believe that our success is largely
dependent on our ability to anticipate and respond promptly to changing consumer
demands and fashion trends in the design, styling and production of our products
and in the merchandising and pricing of products in our retail stores. If we
cannot gauge consumer needs and fashion trends and respond appropriately, then
consumers may not purchase our products. This would result in reduced sales and
profitability and in excess inventories, which would have a material adverse
effect on us.
We believe that consumers in the
United States are shopping less in department stores (our traditional
distribution channel) and more in other channels, such as specialty shops and
mid-tier locations where value is perceived to be higher. In response, our
strategy involves adding new distribution channels, increased investment in our
core brands by focusing on design, quality and value, remodeling of our retail
locations and implementation of new and enhanced retail systems. Despite our
efforts to respond to these trends, there can be no assurance that these trends
will not have a material adverse effect on us.
The apparel, footwear and
accessories industries are heavily influenced by general economic cycles that
affect consumer spending. A prolonged period of depressed consumer spending
would have a material adverse effect on us.
The apparel, footwear and
accessories industries have historically been subject to cyclical variations,
recessions in the general economy and uncertainties regarding future economic
prospects that affect consumer spending habits, which could negatively impact
our business. The success of our operations depends on a number of factors
impacting discretionary consumer spending, including general economic
conditions, consumer confidence, wages and unemployment, housing prices,
consumer debt, interest rates, fuel and energy costs, taxation and political
conditions. A downturn in the economy may affect consumer purchases of our
products and adversely impact our continued growth and profitability.
The loss of or a significant
reduction of business with any of our largest customers would have a material
adverse effect on us.
Our ten largest customer groups,
principally department stores, accounted for approximately 55% of revenues in
2007. Macy's, Inc. accounted for approximately 20% of our 2007 gross revenues.
We believe that purchasing
decisions are generally made independently by department store units within a
customer group. There has been a trend, however, toward more centralized
purchasing decisions. As such decisions become more centralized, the risk to us
of such concentration increases. A decision by the controlling owner of a
customer group of department stores to modify those customers' relationships
with us (for example, decreasing the amount of product purchased from us,
modifying floor space allocated to apparel in general or our products
specifically, or focusing on promotion of private label products rather than our
products) could have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, we believe a
trend exists among our major customers to concentrate purchasing among a
narrowing group of vendors. To the extent any of our key customers reduces the
number of vendors and consequently does not purchase from us, this would have a
material adverse effect on us.
In the future, retailers may have
financial problems or consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, or
realign their affiliations, any of which could further increase the
concentration of our customers. The loss of any of our largest customers, or the
bankruptcy or material financial difficulty of any customer or any of the
companies listed above, could have a material adverse effect on us. We do not
have long-term contracts with any of our customers, and sales to customers
generally occur on an order-by-order
- 21 -
basis. As a result, customers can terminate
their relationships with us at any time or under certain circumstances cancel or
delay orders.
The loss or infringement of our
trademarks and other proprietary rights could have a material adverse effect on
us.
We believe that our trademarks and
other proprietary rights are important to our success and competitive position.
Accordingly, we devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection
of our trademarks on a worldwide basis. There can be no assurances that such
actions taken to establish and protect our trademarks and other proprietary
rights will be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to
prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products as violative of their
trademarks and proprietary rights. Moreover, there can be no assurances that
others will not assert rights in, or ownership of, our trademarks and other
proprietary rights or that we will be able to successfully resolve such
conflicts. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect
proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. The
loss of such trademarks and other proprietary rights, or the loss of the
exclusive use of such trademarks and other proprietary rights, could have a
material adverse effect on us. Any litigation regarding our trademarks could be
time-consuming and costly.
The loss of key personnel could
disrupt our operations and our ability to successfully execute our strategies.
Our executive officers and other
members of senior management have substantial experience and expertise in our
business. Our success depends to a significant extent both upon the continued
services of these individuals as well as our ability to attract, hire, motivate
and retain additional talented and highly qualified management in the future.
Competition for key executives in the apparel, footwear and accessories
industries is intense, and our operations and the execution of our business
strategies could be adversely affected if we cannot attract and retain qualified
executives and other key personnel.
The extent of our foreign
operations and manufacturing may adversely affect our domestic business.
Nearly all of our products are
manufactured outside of North America. The following may adversely affect
foreign operations:
- political instability in countries where contractors and suppliers are
located;
- imposition of regulations and quotas relating to imports;
- imposition of duties, taxes and other charges on imports;
- significant fluctuation of the value of the dollar against foreign
currencies;
- labor shortages in countries where contractors and suppliers are
located; and
- restrictions on the transfer of funds to or from foreign countries.
As a result of our substantial
foreign operations, our domestic business is subject to the following risks:
- uncertainties of sourcing associated with an environment in which quota
has been eliminated on apparel products pursuant to the World Trade
Organization Agreement (although China has agreed to safeguard quota on
certain classes of apparel products through 2008 as a result of a surge in
exports to the United States, political pressure will likely continue for
restraint on importation of apparel);
- reduced manufacturing flexibility because of geographic distance between
us and our foreign manufacturers, increasing the risk that we may have to
mark down unsold inventory as a result of misjudging the market for a
foreign-made product;
- increases in manufacturing costs due to the recent substantial decline
of the United States dollar against major world currencies and higher
labor costs being experienced by some of our foreign manufacturers,
primarily in China; and
- violations by foreign contractors of labor and wage standards and
resulting adverse publicity.
Fluctuations in the price,
availability and quality of raw materials could cause delay and increase costs.
Fluctuations in the price,
availability and quality of the fabrics or other raw materials used by us in our
manufactured apparel and in the price of materials used to manufacture our
footwear and accessories could have a material adverse effect on our cost of
sales or our ability to meet our customers' demands. The prices for such
fabrics depend largely on the market prices for the raw materials used to
produce them, particularly
- 22 -
cotton, leather and synthetics. The price and
availability of such raw materials may fluctuate significantly, depending on
many factors, including crop yields and weather patterns. In the future, we may
not be able to pass all or a portion of such higher raw materials prices on to
our customers.
Our reliance on independent
manufacturers could cause delay and damage our reputation and customer
relationships.
We rely upon independent third
parties for the manufacture of most of our products. A manufacturer's failure
to ship products to us in a timely manner or to meet the required quality
standards could cause us to miss the delivery date requirements of our customers
for those items. The failure to make timely deliveries may drive customers to
cancel orders, refuse to accept deliveries or demand reduced prices, any of
which could have a material adverse effect on us. This could damage our
reputation. We do not have long-term written agreements with any of our third
party manufacturers. As a result, any of these manufacturers may unilaterally
terminate their relationships with us at any time.
We are also increasing
pre-production collaboration efforts with many of our third party manufacturers
to utilize their capabilities to increase speed to market and improve margins.
Difficulties in effectively achieving this collaboration could have an adverse
impact on our ability to achieve a substantial portion of the savings we
anticipate as a result of our strategic review.
Although we have an active program
to train our independent manufacturers in, and monitor their compliance with,
our labor and other factory standards, any failure by those manufacturers to
comply with our standards or any other divergence in their labor or other
practices from those generally considered ethical in the United States and the
potential negative publicity relating to any of these events could materially
harm us and our reputation.
Difficulties in implementing a
new enterprise system could impact our ability to design, produce and ship our
products on a timely basis.
We are in the process of
implementing the SAP Apparel and Footwear Solution as our core operational and
financial system. The implementation of the SAP Apparel and Footwear Solution
software, which began at select locations in November 2006, is a key part of our
ongoing efforts to eliminate redundancies and enhance our overall cost structure
and margin performance. Difficulties migrating existing systems at our remaining
locations to this new software could impact our ability to design, produce and
ship our products on a timely basis.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS
Not Applicable.
- 23 -
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The general location, use and approximate size of our
principal properties are set forth below:
Location
|
Owned/Leased
|
Use
|
Approximate Area
in Square Feet (1)
|
Bristol, Pennsylvania |
leased |
Administrative and computer services |
172,600 |
New York, New York |
leased |
Administrative, executive and sales offices |
788,100 |
Vaughan, Canada |
leased |
Administrative offices and distribution warehouse |
125,000 |
Lawrenceburg, Tennessee |
owned |
Distribution
warehouses |
1,223,800 |
South Hill, Virginia |
leased |
Distribution warehouses |
835,900 |
El Paso, Texas |
leased |
Distribution warehouses |
952,000 |
White Plains, New York |
leased |
Administrative offices |
132,200 |
West Deptford, New Jersey |
leased |
Distribution warehouses |
988,400 |
East Providence, Rhode Island |
leased |
Distribution warehouses, product development,
administrative and computer services |
163,400 |
Edison, New Jersey |
leased |
Distribution warehouse |
156,000 |
_________________
(1) Including mezzanine where applicable.
We sublease a 234,000 square foot
office building in White Plains, New York to an independent company.
We own approximately 550,000
square feet of office and manufacturing facilities in Mexico which are not in
service. We intend to sell these facilities. We also lease approximately 715,250
square feet of warehouse facilities in Goose Creek, South Carolina which are
currently not in service.
Our retail stores are leased
pursuant to long-term leases, typically five to seven years for apparel and
footwear outlet stores and ten years for footwear and accessories and apparel
specialty stores. Certain leases allow us to terminate our obligations after a
predetermined period (generally one to three years) in the event that a
particular location does not achieve specified sales volume, and some leases
have options to renew. Many leases include clauses that provide for contingent
payments based on sales volumes, and many leases contain escalation clauses for
increases in operating costs and real estate taxes.
We believe that our existing
facilities are well maintained, in good operating condition and that our
existing and planned facilities will be adequate for our operations for the
foreseeable future.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We have been named as a defendant
in various actions and proceedings arising from our ordinary business
activities. Although the amount of any liability that could arise with respect
to these actions cannot be accurately predicted, in our opinion, any such
liability will not have a material adverse financial effect on us.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not Applicable.
- 24 -
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Our executive officers are as follows:
Name |
Age |
Office
|
Wesley R. Card |
60 |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Sidney Kimmel |
80 |
Chairman |
Ira M. Dansky |
62 |
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary |
John
T. McClain |
46 |
Chief
Financial Officer |
Andrew
Cohen |
58 |
Chief
Executive Officer - Wholesale Footwear and Accessories |
Christopher
R. Cade |
40 |
Executive
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller |
Mr. Card was named our President
and Chief Executive Officer on July 12, 2007. Mr. Card had been our Chief
Operating Officer since March 2002. He had also been appointed Chief Financial
Officer in March 2007, a position he previously held from 1990 to March 2006.
Mr. Kimmel founded the Jones
Apparel Division of W.R. Grace & Co. in 1970. Mr. Kimmel has served as our
Chairman since 1975 and as Chief Executive Officer from 1975 to May 2002.
Mr. Dansky has been our General
Counsel since 1996 and our Secretary since January 2001. He was elected an
Executive Vice President in March 2002.
Mr. McClain became our Chief
Financial Officer on July 16, 2007. Prior to joining us, Mr. McClain served as
Chief Accounting Officer of Avis Budget Group, Inc. (formerly Cendant
Corporation), a position he assumed in July 2006. From 1999 to July 2006, Mr.
McClain served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller for
Cendant Corporation.
Mr. Cohen was named Chief
Executive Officer - Wholesale Footwear and Accessories in April 2006 and served
as President - Wholesale Footwear and Accessories from January 2006 until April
2006. He was the Group President of the Energie and l.e.i.
divisions from May 2004 to January 2006 and President of the Energie
Division from July 2001 until May 2004.
Mr. Cade was named Executive Vice
President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller on December 17, 2007. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Cade served as Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting
Officer and Controller of Realogy Corporation (formerly Cendant Corporation), a
position he assumed in August 2006. From June 2004 through July 2006, Mr. Cade
served as Vice President, Corporate Finance, of Cendant Corporation. Prior to
joining Cendant, he held various financial and accounting positions, including
Director, Corporate Accounting and Reporting, of Public Service Enterprise
Group, where he was employed from October 2002 to June 2004.
- 25 -
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S
COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
First Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third Quarter
|
Fourth Quarter
|
Price range of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
High |
$35.54 |
$34.73 |
$28.72 |
$23.08 |
Low |
$30.22 |
$27.50 |
$16.73 |
$15.98 |
2006 |
|
|
|
|
High |
$36.10 |
$35.98 |
$33.07 |
$34.51 |
Low |
$28.58 |
$30.59 |
$27.30 |
$31.72 |
Dividends per share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
$0.14 |
2006 |
$0.12 |
$0.12 |
$0.12 |
$0.14 |
Our common stock is traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "JNY." The above figures set
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices per share of our
common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape. The last
reported sale price per share of our common stock on February 21, 2008 was
$14.60,
and on that date there were 411 holders of record of our common stock. However,
many shares are held in "street name;" therefore, the number of
holders of record may not represent the actual number of shareholders.
Annual CEO Certification
The Annual CEO Certification
required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company
Manual was submitted to the New York Stock Exchange on June 27, 2007.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth the
repurchases of our common stock for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period |
(a) Total
Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased |
(b) Average
Price Paid per Share (or Unit) |
(c) Total
Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs |
(d) Maximum
Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet
Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
October
7, 2007 to
November 3, 2007 |
2,462,819 |
$22.31* |
2,462,819 |
$303,078,306 |
November 4,
2007 to
December 1, 2007 |
- |
- |
- |
$303,078,306 |
December
2, 2007 to
December 31, 2007 |
- |
- |
- |
$303,078,306 |
Total |
2,462,819 |
$22.31* |
2,462,819 |
$303,078,306 |
* - Represents the average price per share for
all shares purchased under the accelerated share repurchase program described
below.
- 26 -
These repurchases were made under
a program announced on September 6, 2007 for $500.0 million. This program has no
expiration date.
On September 6, 2007, we paid
$400.0 million for the purchase of our common stock under an accelerated share
repurchase ("ASR") program entered into with Goldman, Sachs & Co.
("Goldman"). We received an initial delivery of 15.5 million shares on
September 11, 2007 and a second delivery of 2.4 million shares on October 18,
2007. The combined average price for the 17.9 million shares delivered to date
under the ASR is $22.31 per share. Remaining shares, if any, to be received
under the ASR program, up to a maximum of 3.1 million shares, will be received
upon final settlement of the program, which is scheduled for no later than July
19, 2008, and may occur earlier at the option of Goldman or later under certain
circumstances. The exact number of additional shares, if any, to be delivered to
us under the ASR will be based on the volume weighted-average price of our stock
during the term of the ASR, subject to a minimum and maximum price for the
purchased shares. The initial shares repurchased are subject to adjustment if we
enter into or announce certain types of transactions.
Comparative Performance
The SEC requires us to present a
chart comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with
the cumulative total stockholder return of (i) a broad equity market index and
(ii) a published industry index or peer group. The following chart compares the
performance of our common stock with that of the S&P 500 Composite Index and
the S&P 500 Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods Index, assuming an
investment of $100 on December 31, 2002 in each of our common stock, the stocks
comprising the S&P 500 Composite Index and the stocks comprising the S&P
500 Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods Index and the reinvestment of
dividends.
- 27 -
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following financial
information is qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction
with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations" contained elsewhere in this Report. The selected
consolidated financial information presented below is derived from our audited
Consolidated Financial Statements for each of the five years in the period ended
December 31, 2007. We completed our acquisitions of Kasper, Maxwell and Barneys
at various dates within the five-year period and, accordingly, the results of
their operations are included in our operating results from the respective dates
of acquisition. On September 6, 2007, we sold Barneys. The results of operations
of Barneys have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
(All amounts in millions except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
$ 3,793.3
|
$ 4,014.8
|
$ 4,473.3
|
$ 4,573.2
|
$ 4,339.1
|
|
Licensing income |
52.0
|
51.1
|
58.9
|
57.1
|
36.2
|
|
Service and other revenues |
3.2
|
21.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
3,848.5 |
4,087.0 |
4,532.2 |
4,630.3 |
4,375.3 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
2,609.1
|
2,674.2
|
2,950.4
|
2,933.9
|
2,738.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
1,239.4 |
1,412.8 |
1,581.8 |
1,696.4 |
1,636.7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
1,100.4
|
1,096.3
|
1,128.3
|
1,170.9
|
1,052.4
|
|
Loss on sale of Polo Jeans
Company business |
-
|
45.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Trademark impairments |
88.0
|
50.2
|
-
|
0.2
|
4.5
|
|
Goodwill impairment |
78.0
|
441.2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
(27.0)
|
(220.0)
|
453.5
|
525.3
|
579.8
|
|
Interest income |
3.7
|
3.5
|
1.1
|
1.9
|
3.5
|
|
Interest expense and financing costs |
51.5
|
50.5
|
71.0
|
51.1
|
58.8
|
|
Gain on sale of stock in Rubicon Retail
Limited |
-
|
17.4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Gain on sale of interest in
Australian joint venture |
8.2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
8.1
|
4.5
|
3.2
|
3.8
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
(58.5)
|
(245.1)
|
386.8
|
479.9
|
527.0
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
(1) |
(104.4)
|
(70.1)
|
134.0
|
180.5
|
198.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
45.9
|
(175.0)
|
252.8
|
299.4
|
328.6
|
|
Income from
discontinued operations, net of tax (2) |
265.2
|
29.0
|
21.5
|
2.4
|
-
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for
share-based payments, net of tax |
-
|
1.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) |
$311.1
|
$ (144.1)
|
$
274.3
|
$ 301.8
|
$ 328.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
$ 0.46 |
$ (1.58) |
$ 2.15 |
$ 2.42 |
$ 2.58 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
2.65 |
0.26 |
0.18 |
0.02 |
- |
|
|
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
- |
0.02 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per share |
$ 3.11 |
$ (1.30) |
$ 2.33 |
$ 2.44 |
$ 2.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$0.45 |
$(1.58) |
$2.12 |
$2.37 |
$2.48 |
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
2.62 |
0.26 |
0.18 |
0.02 |
- |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
- |
0.02 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$3.07 |
$(1.30) |
$2.30 |
$2.39 |
$2.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 28 -
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
Per Share Data
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid per share
|
$ 0.56 |
$ 0.50 |
$ 0.44 |
$ 0.36 |
$ 0.16 |
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
99.9 |
110.6 |
118.0 |
123.6 |
127.3 |
Diluted
|
101.3 |
110.6 |
119.2 |
126.5 |
136.5 |
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
$ 898.5 |
$ 984.2 |
$ 447.9 |
$ 612.3 |
$ 826.9 |
|
Total assets |
3,236.6 |
3,801.1 |
4,577.8 |
4,571.4 |
4,187.7 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
4.8 |
104.1 |
357.3 |
203.2 |
180.8 |
|
Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations |
777.7 |
785.1 |
786.4 |
1,013.3 |
835.1 |
|
Stockholders' equity |
1,996.8 |
2,211.6 |
2,666.4 |
2,653.9 |
2,537.8 |
(1) |
As a result of the capital gain generated by
the sale of Barneys, we reversed a $107.7 million deferred tax valuation
allowance previously created from capital loss carryforwards that we had
not expected to be able to utilize. The reversal of the tax valuation
allowance has been recorded in income from continuing operations as the
creation of the deferred tax valuation allowance was recorded in
continuing operations in 2006 upon the sale of our Polo Jeans Company
business.
|
(2) |
On September 6, 2007, we sold Barneys. In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the results of
operations of Barneys have been reported as discontinued operations for
all periods presented. The 2007 amount includes an after-tax gain of
$254.2 million from the sale. |
- 29 -
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides
information and analysis of our results of operations from 2005 through 2007,
and our liquidity and capital resources. The following discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein.
Executive Overview
We design, contract for the
manufacture of, manufacture and market a broad range of women's collection
sportswear, suits and dresses, casual sportswear and jeanswear for women and
children, and women's footwear and accessories. We sell our products through a
broad array of distribution channels, including better specialty and department
stores and mass merchandisers, primarily in the United States and Canada. We
also operate our own network of retail and factory outlet stores. In addition,
we license the use of several of our brand names to select manufacturers and
distributors of women's and men's apparel and accessories worldwide.
During 2007, the following
significant events took place:
- in May 2007, we announced our strategic decision to exit or sell certain
of our moderate product lines;
- in September 2007, we sold Barneys to an affiliate of Istithmar PJSC, a
Dubai-based private equity and alternative investment house, for $937.4
million in cash;
- in September 2007, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase
program to repurchase $400.0 million of our common stock;
- in September 2007, Standard & Poor's and Moody's downgraded
their credit ratings on our senior notes; and
- in October 2007, we announced the closing of warehouse facilities in New
Jersey and South Carolina.
Trends
We believe that several
significant trends are occurring in the women's apparel, footwear and
accessories industry. We believe that a trend exists among our major retail
accounts to concentrate their women's apparel, footwear and accessories buying
among a narrowing group of vendors and to differentiate their product offerings
through exclusivity of brands. We believe department stores are increasing the
focus of their product assortments on their own private label products. We also
believe that consumers in the United States and Canada are shopping in multiple
channels, including specialty shops and national chains where value is perceived
to be higher. We have responded to these trends by enhancing the brand equity of
our brands through our focus on design, quality and value, and through strategic
acquisitions which provide significant diversification to the business by
successfully adding new distribution channels, labels and product lines. Through
this diversification, we have evolved into a multidimensional resource in
apparel, footwear and accessories and retail. We have leveraged the strength of
our brands to increase both the number of locations and amount of selling space
in which our products are offered and to introduce product extensions. We have
also leveraged our design, production and marketing capabilities to develop and
provide proprietary branded and private label products to major wholesale
customers.
On January 1, 2005, the World
Trade Organization's 148 member nations lifted all quotas on apparel and
textiles. As a result, all textiles and textile apparel manufactured in a member
nation and exported after January 1, 2005 are no longer subject to quota
restrictions. This allows retailers, apparel firms and others to import
unlimited quantities of apparel and textile items from China, India and other
low-cost countries. The effects of this action could lead to lower production
costs or allow us to improve the quality of our products for a given cost and
could also allow us to concentrate production in the most efficient markets.
However, the recent substantial decline of the United States dollar against
major world currencies and higher labor costs being experienced by some of our
foreign manufacturers, primarily in China, could cause our manufacturing costs
to rise. China has also implemented an export tax on many of the items
previously subject to quota restriction. In addition, litigation and political
activity has been initiated by interested parties seeking to re-impose quotas.
As a result, we are unable to predict the long-term effects of the lifting of
quota restrictions and related events on our results of operations.
- 30 -
Exit or Reduction in Scale of Certain Moderate Brands
Our continued strategic
operational reviews and efforts to improve profitability and the continued trend
of our moderate customers towards differentiated product offerings led us to
make the strategic decision to exit or significantly reduce the scale of some of
our moderate product lines during 2007. We believe that exiting or reducing
these product lines will strengthen our future operating results and allow us to
focus primarily on growth opportunities in our remaining wholesale product
lines, which have strong fundamentals and operate at substantially higher
margins. This decision will not impact in any way our denim and junior division
labels such as Gloria Vanderbilt, l.e.i., Energie, Jeanstar, Grane and
others, which are also reported in the wholesale moderate apparel segment. As a
result of the loss of these projected revenues, we recorded impairments for our Norton
McNaughton and Erika trademarks of $80.5 million in our licensing,
other and eliminations segment. The moderate product lines we are exiting have
not been classified as discontinued operations as they do not meet the criteria
for discontinued operations as set forth in SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets."
Sale of Barneys
On September 6, 2007, we completed
the sale of Barneys to an affiliate of Istithmar PJSC. We received $937.4
million of cash (net of working capital adjustments) and paid an aggregate of
$54.5 million in cash as of December 31, 2007 for bonuses for key Barneys
employees, compensation for restricted stock held by certain employees of
Barneys that was forfeited upon the completion of the sale and other fees and
costs related to the sale. Net cash proceeds, after estimated taxes expected to
be paid, are expected to amount to approximately $840.0 million. This
transaction did not result in a default under, nor an obligation to redeem or
repurchase, any of our senior notes.
As a result of the capital gain
generated by the sale of Barneys, we reversed a $107.7 million deferred tax
valuation allowance previously created from capital loss carryforwards that we
had not expected to be able to utilize. The reversal of the tax valuation
allowance has been recorded in income from continuing operations.
In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 144, the results of operations of Barneys for the current and prior
periods have been reported as discontinued operations and the assets and
liabilities relating to Barneys have been reclassified as held for sale for all
prior periods in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Sale of Polo Jeans Company Business
In October 1995, we acquired
an exclusive license to manufacture and market women's shirts, blouses,
skirts, jackets, suits, sweaters, pants, vests, coats, outerwear and hats under
the Lauren by Ralph Lauren trademark in the United States, Canada and Mexico
pursuant to license and design service agreements with Polo (collectively, the
"Lauren License"), which were to expire on December 31, 2006. In May
1998, we acquired an exclusive license to manufacture and market women's
dresses, shirts, blouses, skirts, jackets, suits, sweaters, pants, vests, coats,
outerwear and hats under the Ralph by Ralph Lauren trademark in the United
States, Canada and Mexico pursuant to license and design service agreements with
Polo (the "Ralph License"). The Ralph License was scheduled to end on
December 31, 2003.
During the course of the
discussions concerning the Ralph License, Polo asserted that the expiration of
the Ralph License would cause the Lauren License agreements to end on December
31, 2003, instead of December 31, 2006. We believed that this was an improper
interpretation and that the expiration of the Ralph License did not cause the
Lauren License to end.
On June 3, 2003, we announced that
our discussions with Polo regarding the interpretation of the Lauren License had
reached an impasse and that, as a result, we had filed a complaint in the New
York State Supreme Court against Polo and its affiliates and our former
President, Jackwyn Nemerov. The complaint alleged that Polo breached the Lauren
License agreements by claiming that the license ends at the end of 2003. The
complaint also alleged that Ms. Nemerov breached the confidentiality and
non-compete provisions of her employment agreement with us. Additionally, Polo
was alleged to have induced Ms. Nemerov to breach her employment agreement and
Ms. Nemerov was alleged to have induced Polo to breach the Lauren License
- 31 -
agreements. We asked the court to enter a judgment for compensatory damages
of $550 million, as well as punitive damages, and to enforce the confidentiality
and non-compete provisions of Ms. Nemerov's employment agreement.
These matters were resolved by
settlement dated January 22, 2006, which closed on February 3, 2006. In
connection with this settlement, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with
Polo and certain of its subsidiaries with respect to the sale to Polo of all
outstanding stock of Sun. We received gross proceeds of $355.0 million in
connection with the sale and the settlement. Sun's assets and liabilities on
the closing date primarily related to the Polo Jeans Company business,
which Sun operated under long-term license and design agreements entered into
with Polo in 1995. We retained distribution and product development facilities
in El Paso, Texas, along with certain working capital items, including accounts
receivable and accounts payable. In addition, as part of the agreements, we
provided certain support services to Polo (including manufacturing, distribution
and information technology) until January 2007 and we continued to provide
certain financial and administrative functions until March 2007.
We recorded a pre-tax loss of
approximately $145.1 million after allocating $356.7 million of goodwill to the
business sold and a pre-tax gain of $100.0 million related to the litigation
settlement. Approximately $3.7 million in state and local taxes have been
accrued related to the litigation settlement, resulting in a combined after tax
loss of approximately $48.8 million. The combined loss created federal and state
capital loss carryforwards that we are using to partially offset the gain
realized from the sale of Barneys.
Restructuring
In late 2003, we began to evaluate
the need to broaden global sourcing capabilities to respond to the competitive
pricing and global sourcing capabilities of our denim competitors, as the
favorable production costs from non-duty/non-quota countries and the breadth of
fabric options from Asia began to outweigh the benefits of Mexico's quick turn
and superior laundry capabilities. On July 11, 2005, we announced that we had
completed a comprehensive review of our denim manufacturing operations located
in Mexico. The primary action plan arising from this review resulted in the
closing of the laundry, assembly and distribution operations located in San
Luis, Mexico (the "denim restructuring"). All manufacturing was
consolidated into existing operations in Durango and Torreon, Mexico. A total of
3,170 employees were terminated as a result of the closure.
In connection with the denim
restructuring, we recorded $11.4 million of net pre-tax costs (of which $12.1
million was recorded in 2005 and $0.7 million was reversed in 2006), which
includes $5.1 million of one-time termination benefits, $3.1 million of losses
on the sale of property, plant and equipment, $2.3 million of contract
termination costs and $0.9 million of legal and other associated costs.
In December 2005, we closed our
distribution center in Bristol, Pennsylvania. A total of 118 employees were
affected by the closure. We recorded charges of $3.6 million and $0.4 million in
2005 and 2006, respectively, related to one-time termination benefits and other
employee-related matters.
On May 15, 2006, we announced the
closing of our Secaucus, New Jersey warehouse to reduce excess capacity. In
connection with the closing, we incurred $2.7 million of one-time termination
benefits and associated employee costs for 211 employees and $1.6 million for
cleanup costs and remaining rent payments in 2006.
On May 30, 2006, we announced the
closing of our Stein Mart leased shoe departments, effective January 2007. In
connection with the closing, we accrued $1.2 million and reversed $0.1 million
of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs in 2006 and 2007,
respectively, for 468 employees.
On September 12, 2006, we
announced the closing of certain El Paso, Texas and Mexican operations related
to the decision by Polo to discontinue the Polo Jeans Company product
line (the "manufacturing restructuring") , which we produced for Polo
subsequent to the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business to Polo in
February 2006. In connection with the El Paso closing, we incurred $4.3 million
of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for 113 employees
and $0.7 million of other costs. Of this amount, $4.1 million was recorded
during 2006 and $0.9 million was recorded during 2007. In connection with the
- 32 -
Mexican closing, we expect to incur $3.0 million of one-time termination
benefits and associated employee costs for 1,729 employees and $0.7 million of
other costs. Of this amount, $2.8 million was recorded in 2006 and $0.7 million
was recorded in 2007. The remaining $0.2 million will be recorded during 2008.
In addition, we determined the estimated fair value of the property, plant and
equipment employed in Mexico was less than its carrying value. As a result, we
recorded an impairment loss of $8.6 million in 2006.
In connection with the exit and
reorganization of certain moderate apparel product lines, we decided to close
certain New York offices, and on October 9, 2007, we announced the closing of
warehouse facilities in Goose Creek, South Carolina. We expect to incur $8.0
million of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for
approximately 440 employees. Of this amount, $7.9 million was recorded in 2007
and the remaining $0.1 million will be recorded in 2008. These closings were
substantially complete by the end of February 2008.
On October 17, 2007, we announced
the closing of warehouse facilities in Edison, New Jersey. We expect to incur
$3.5 million of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for
approximately 160 employees. Of this amount, $2.8 million was recorded in 2007,
and the remaining $0.7 will be recorded in 2008. The closing will be
substantially complete by the end of June 2008.
For further information, see
"Accrued Restructuring Costs" in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Strategic Review of Operations
In mid-2005, we completed a
strategic review of our operating infrastructure and general and administrative
support areas to improve profitability and to ensure we are properly positioned
for the long-term benefit of our shareholders. By proactively reviewing our
infrastructure, systems and operating processes at a time when the industry is
undergoing consolidation and change, we plan to eliminate redundancies and
improve our overall cost structure and margin performance.
Supply Chain Management
- We have implemented and continue to enhance a product development
management system.
- We are now utilizing the capabilities of our third-party manufacturers
to increase pre-production product development activities directly with
them.
- We selected SAP Apparel and Footwear Solution as our enterprise resource
planning system, which has been implemented in the majority of our apparel
operations and will ultimately be implemented company-wide.
- The logistics network has been analyzed to reduce costs and increase
efficiency by following a tiered approach of (i) multiple product usage of
existing distribution centers, (ii) utilizing third party logistics
providers, and (iii) ultimately direct shipping from factory to customer.
We have closed four distribution centers since 2005 as a result of these
efforts and other restructuring actions, with one additional distribution
center scheduled to close in 2008.
- In response to the elimination of apparel quotas and other trade
safeguards, we have been consolidating our third-party manufacturing to a
more concentrated vendor matrix.
General and Administrative Areas
- We are implementing best practices in connection with the migration of
our current systems to the SAP Apparel and Footwear Solution platform.
The implementation and execution
of the initiatives, other than the company-wide implementation of SAP, were
substantially completed by the end of 2007. We have reduced annual costs by
approximately $100 million over the period. Total costs (including capital
expenditures, severance costs and fees) for our strategic review and the related
initiatives are expected to be approximately $120 million. As of December 31,
2007, we have spent a total of $117.5 million.
- 33 -
While customer consolidation,
other restructurings and the difficult retail climate have served to offset much
of the impact of these cost reductions, we are now in an excellent position to
benefit from these initiatives as we move forward.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired and accounted for under
the purchase method. Accounting rules require that we test at least annually for
possible goodwill impairment. We perform our test in the fourth fiscal quarter
of each year using a discounted cash flow analysis that requires that certain
assumptions and estimates be made regarding industry economic factors and future
profitability. As a result of the 2006 impairment analysis, we determined that
the goodwill balance existing in our wholesale moderate apparel segment was
impaired as a result of decreases in projected revenues and profitability with
respect to our Norton McNaughton, l.e.i. and certain other
moderate apparel brands, as well as changes in business strategy with respect to
our Norton McNaughton brand. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment
charge of $441.2 million. As a result of the 2007 impairment analysis, we
determined that the remaining goodwill balance existing in our wholesale
moderate apparel segment was impaired as a result of decreases in projected
revenues and profitability for certain brands. Accordingly, we recorded an
impairment charge of $78.0 million.
We also perform our annual
impairment test for trademarks during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year. As
a result of the 2007 impairment analysis, we recorded trademark impairment
charges of $7.5 million as a result of decreases in projected revenues for
certain brands. We also recorded trademark impairment charges of $80.5 million
in 2007 as a result of our decision to discontinue our Norton McNaughton
brand and significantly reduce the scale of our Erika brand. As a result
of the 2006 impairment analysis, we recorded trademark impairment charges of
$50.2 million as a result of decreases in projected revenues for our Norton
McNaughton brand, our Albert Nipon better apparel brand, our Westies
and Sam & Libby footwear brands and our Richelieu costume
jewelry brand. All trademark impairment charges are reported as selling, general
and administrative expenses in the licensing, other and eliminations segment.
Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued
a revision of SFAS No. 123, "Share-Based Payment" (hereinafter
referred to as "SFAS No. 123R"), which requires that the cost
resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the
financial statements. This Statement establishes fair value as the measurement
objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all
entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for
share-based payment transactions with employees except for equity instruments
held by employee share ownership plans. We adopted SFAS No. 123R on January 1,
2006 using the modified prospective application option. As a result, the
compensation cost for the portion of awards we granted before January 1, 2006
for which the requisite service had not been rendered and that were outstanding
as of January 1, 2006 will be recognized as the remaining requisite service is
rendered. In addition, the adoption of SFAS No. 123R required us to change from
recognizing the effect of forfeitures as they occur to estimating the number of
outstanding instruments for which the requisite service is not expected to be
rendered. As a result, we recorded a pretax gain of $3.1 million on January 1,
2006, which is reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle. We were also required to change the amortization period for employees
eligible to retire from the period over which the awards vest to the period from
the grant date to the date the employee is eligible to retire. This change
resulted in additional amortization expense of $1.9 million and $0.1 million for
2007 and 2006, respectively. Concurrently with the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we
have shifted the composition of our share-based compensation awards towards the
use of restricted shares and away from the use of employee stock options.
Accelerated Share Repurchase Program
On September 6, 2007, we paid
$400.0 million for the purchase of our common stock under an accelerated share
repurchase ("ASR") program entered into with Goldman, Sachs & Co.
("Goldman"). We received an initial delivery of 15.5 million shares on
September 11, 2007 and a second delivery of 2.4 million shares on October 18,
2007. The combined average price for the 17.9 million shares delivered to date
under the ASR
- 34 -
is $22.31 per share. Remaining shares, if any, to be received
under the ASR program, up to a maximum of 3.1 million shares, will be received upon final settlement of the program,
which is scheduled for no later than July 19, 2008, and may occur earlier at the
option of Goldman or later under certain circumstances. The exact number of
additional shares, if any, to be delivered to us under the ASR will be based on
the volume weighted-average price of our stock during the term of the ASR,
subject to a minimum and maximum price for the purchased shares. The initial
shares repurchased are subject to adjustment if we enter into or announce
certain types of transactions.
Critical Accounting Policies
Several of our accounting policies
involve significant or complex judgements and uncertainties and require us to
make certain critical accounting estimates. We consider an accounting estimate
to be critical if it requires us to make assumptions about matters that were
highly uncertain at the time the estimate was made. The estimates with the
greatest potential effect on our results of operations and financial position
include the collectibility of accounts receivable, the recovery value of
obsolete or overstocked inventory and the fair values of both our goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives. Estimates related to accounts
receivable affect our wholesale better apparel, wholesale moderate apparel,
wholesale footwear and accessories and retail segments. Estimates related to
inventory and goodwill affect our wholesale better apparel, wholesale moderate
apparel, wholesale footwear and accessories and retail segments. Estimates
related to intangible assets with indefinite lives affect our licensing, other
and eliminations segment.
For accounts receivable, we
estimate the net collectibility, considering both historical and anticipated
trends of trade discounts and co-op advertising deductions taken by our
customers, allowances we provide to our retail customers to flow goods through
the retail channels, and the possibility of non-collection due to the financial
position of our customers. For inventory, we estimate the amount of goods that
we will not be able to sell in the normal course of business and write down the
value of these goods to the recovery value expected to be realized through
off-price channels. Historically, actual results in these areas have not been
materially different than our estimates, and we do not anticipate that our
estimates and assumptions are likely to materially change in the future.
However, if we incorrectly anticipate trends or unexpected events occur, our
results of operations could be materially affected.
We test our goodwill and our
intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment on an annual basis
(during our fourth fiscal quarter) and between annual tests if an event occurs
or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of
an asset below its carrying value. We recorded goodwill impairments of $78.0
million and $441.2 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. We recorded trademark
impairments of $88.0 million and $50.2 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
For more information, see "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" in
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We test both our goodwill and our
trademarks for impairment by utilizing discounted cash flow models to estimate
their fair values. These cash flow models involve several assumptions. Changes
in our assumptions could materially impact our fair value estimates. Assumptions
critical to our fair value estimates are: (i) discount rates used to derive the
present value factors used in determining the fair value of the reporting units
and trademarks; (ii) royalty rates used in our trade mark valuations; (iii)
projected average revenue growth rates used in the reporting unit and trademark
models; and (iv) projected long-term growth rates used in the derivation of
terminal year values. These and other assumptions are impacted by economic
conditions and expectations of management and will change in the future based on
period-specific facts and circumstances. Based on our latest annual testing, the
following table shows the range of assumptions we used to derive our fair value
estimates and the hypothetical additional impairment charge for goodwill and
trademarks resulting from a one percentage point unfavorable change in each of
our fair value assumptions (amounts in millions).
|
Assumptions
|
Effect of one percentage point
unfavorable change in:
|
|
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Discount rates |
9.5% |
9.5% |
$ 475.9 |
$ 4.6 |
Royalty rates |
-- |
1.0% - 7.0% |
-- |
15.5 |
Revenue growth rates |
(16.3%) - 9.7% |
(100%) - 57.5% |
379.6 |
1.3 |
Long-term growth rates |
3.0% |
0% - 3.0% |
492.6 |
3.2 |
- 35 -
We have not made any material
changes to any of our critical accounting estimates in the last three years. Our
senior management has discussed the development and selection of our critical
accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. In
addition, there are other items within our financial statements that require
estimation, but are not deemed critical as defined above. Changes in estimates
used in these and other items could have a material impact on our financial
statements.
Results of Operations
Statements of Operations Stated in Dollars and as a Percentage of Total Revenues
(In millions)
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
Net sales |
$
3,793.3
|
98.6%
|
|
$
4,014.8
|
98.2%
|
|
$
4,473.3
|
98.7%
|
Licensing income |
52.0
|
1.4%
|
|
51.1
|
1.3%
|
|
58.9
|
1.3%
|
Service
and other revenues |
3.2
|
0.1%
|
|
21.1
|
0.5%
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
3,848.5
|
100.0%
|
|
4,087.0
|
100.0%
|
|
4,532.2
|
100.0%
|
Cost of goods sold |
2,609.1
|
67.8%
|
|
2,674.2
|
65.4%
|
|
2,950.4
|
65.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
1,239.4
|
32.2%
|
|
1,412.8
|
34.6%
|
|
1,581.8
|
34.9%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,100.4
|
28.6%
|
|
1,096.3
|
26.8%
|
|
1,128.3
|
24.9%
|
Loss on sale of
Polo Jeans Company business |
-
|
-
|
|
45.1
|
1.1%
|
|
-
|
-
|
Trademark
impairments |
88.0
|
2.3%
|
|
50.2
|
1.2%
|
|
-
|
-
|
Goodwill impairments |
78.0
|
2.0%
|
|
441.2
|
10.8%
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(27.0)
|
(0.7%)
|
|
(220.0)
|
(5.4%)
|
|
453.5
|
10.0%
|
Interest income |
3.7
|
0.1%
|
|
3.5
|
0.1%
|
|
1.1
|
0.0%
|
Interest expense and financing costs |
51.5
|
1.3%
|
|
50.5
|
1.2%
|
|
71.0
|
1.6%
|
Gain
on sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
-
|
-
|
|
17.4
|
0.4%
|
|
-
|
-
|
Gain
on sale of interest in Australian joint venture |
8.2
|
0.2%
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
8.1
|
0.2%
|
|
4.5
|
0.1%
|
|
3.2
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing
operations before provision for income taxes |
(58.5)
|
(1.5%)
|
|
(245.1)
|
(6.0%)
|
|
386.8
|
8.5%
|
(Benefit)
provision for income taxes |
(104.4)
|
(2.7%)
|
|
(70.1)
|
(1.7%)
|
|
134.0
|
2.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
45.9
|
1.2%
|
|
(175.0)
|
(4.3%)
|
|
252.8
|
5.6%
|
Income from
discontinued operations, including gain on sale of Barneys in 2007, net of tax |
265.2
|
6.9%
|
|
29.0
|
0.7%
|
|
21.5
|
0.5%
|
Cumulative effect
of change in accounting for share-based payments, net of tax |
-
|
-
|
|
1.9
|
0.0%
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
$ 311.1
|
8.1%
|
|
$ (144.1)
|
(3.5%)
|
|
$ 274.3
|
6.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage totals may not agree due to rounding.
2007 Compared with 2006
Revenues. Total
revenues for 2007 were $3.8 billion compared with $4.1 billion for 2006, a
decrease of 5.8%. Revenues by segment were as follows:
(In millions)
|
2007
|
2006
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
Percent
Change
|
Wholesale better apparel |
$
1,101.0
|
$ 1,127.4
|
$
(26.4)
|
(2.3%)
|
Wholesale moderate apparel |
985.0
|
1,142.0
|
(157.0)
|
(13.7%)
|
Wholesale footwear and accessories |
955.8
|
941.1
|
14.7
|
1.6%
|
Retail |
753.7 |
822.7 |
(69.0) |
(8.4%) |
Licensing and other |
53.0
|
53.8
|
(0.8)
|
(1.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
$ 3,848.5
|
$ 4,087.0
|
$
(238.5)
|
(5.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale better apparel revenues
decreased primarily due to the effects of the sale of the Polo Jeans Company
business, which contributed $24.6 million in net sales in 2006. Shipments of our
Jones New York Signature and Evan-Picone product lines increased
due to orders from our customers based on the performance of these brands at
retail. These increases were offset by decreased shipments of our Jones New
York Suit product line due to decreased orders from our customers based on
the performance of this brands at retail
- 36 -
and decreased shipments of our Jones New York, Anne Klein and Jones
New York Sport product lines due to decreased orders from our customers
driven by the overall challenging retail environment.
Wholesale moderate apparel
revenues decreased primarily due to decreased shipments and higher markdown
allowances to clear inventory in the moderate brands we are exiting or
significantly reducing (including the Norton McNaughton, Bandolino, Nine
& Co. and Rena Rowan product lines), decreased shipments of our
denim product lines due to decreased orders from our customers driven by the
overall challenging retail environment that developed during the fourth quarter
of 2007 and the discontinuance by our wholesale customers of their exclusive W,
Joneswear Jeans, C.L.O.T.H.E.S., Latina and Duckhead product lines.
These decreases were partially offset by increased shipments of our Energie
product line due to increased orders from our customers based on the performance
of this brand at retail.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
revenues increased primarily due to (1) increased shipping in our international
business due to increased orders from our existing customers and the addition of
new territories, (2) increased shipments of our Nine West and Nine
& Co. handbag products due to higher customer orders from strong product
performance at retail, and (3) the launch of our Anne Klein New York, Joan
& David, Boutique 9 and l.e.i. footwear product lines. These
increases were partially offset by reductions in our Nine West and
certain other footwear product lines due to retail consolidations and the timing
of shipments to certain retailers and lower levels of sales to off-price
retailers.
Retail revenues decreased
primarily due to the effect of the closing of our leased Stein Mart locations
($51.7 million) and a 6.5% decline in comparable store sales ($45.9
million)(comparable stores are stores that have been open for a full year, are
not scheduled to close in the current period and are not scheduled for an
expansion or downsize by more than 25% or relocation to a different street or
mall), offset by $29.3 million from new store openings. Excluding Barneys, we
began 2007 with 1,100 retail locations and had a net decrease of 66 locations
(primarily the Stein Mart locations) during the period to end the period with
1,034 locations.
Revenues for 2007 also include
$1.0 million in the licensing and other segment of service fees charged to
Barneys under a short-term transition services agreement entered into with
Barneys at the time of the sale. These revenues are based on contractual monthly
fees as set forth in the agreement. The agreement is scheduled to end in May
2008.
Revenues for 2007 and 2006 also
include $1.2 million and $17.4 million, respectively, of service fees charged to
Polo under a short-term transition service agreement entered into with Polo at
the time of the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business. These revenues
were based on contractual monthly and per-unit fees as set forth in the
agreement. Of the 2007 amount, $1.0 million was recorded in the wholesale better
apparel segment and $0.2 million was recorded in the wholesale moderate apparel
segment. Of the 2006 amount, $11.7 million was recorded in the wholesale better
apparel segment, $3.1 million was recorded in the wholesale moderate apparel
segment and $2.6 million was recorded in the licensing and other segment. The
agreement terminated in March 2007.
Gross Profit. The
gross profit margin was 32.2% in 2007 and 34.6% in 2006.
Wholesale better apparel gross
profit margins were 32.4% and 36.5% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
decrease was due to reduced sales of higher-margin Polo Jeans Company
products as a result of the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business,
higher levels of sales to off-price retailers and higher levels of markdowns to
assist our customers with the overall challenging retail environment.
Wholesale moderate apparel gross
profit margins were 18.6% and 21.2% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
decrease was a result of higher levels of markdowns to clear excess inventory
and to assist our customers with the overall challenging retail environment that
developed during the fourth quarter of 2007, as well as higher levels of sales
to off-price retailers, higher production costs and higher levels of air
freight.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
gross profit margins were 28.2% and 28.6% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
decrease was a result of a higher level of markdowns to clear excess inventory
and higher net sales in our lower-margin international business in 2007, offset
by the launch of our higher-margin AK
- 37 -
Anne Klein jewelry line in 2007, and by markdowns related to the
discontinuance of the licensed Tommy Hilfiger jewelry line and writedowns
of excess inventory in our direct selling jewelry and accessory business in
2006.
Retail gross profit margins were
48.4% and 51.4% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease was the result of
a higher level of promotional activity in our footwear and accessories stores to
liquidate excess inventory in 2007, partially offset by the liquidation of
inventory related to the closing of our Stein Mart locations in 2006.
SG&A Expenses.
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses were
approximately $1.1 billion in both 2007 and 2006. SG&A expenses in 2007
included $10.3 million and $0.4 million recorded in the wholesale moderate and
wholesale better apparel segments, respectively, related to the exit of certain
brands and the closing of warehouse facilities. Increased expenses resulting
from the opening of new retail stores amounted to $18.0 million in 2007, which
were offset by $19.7 million of cost savings resulting from the shutdown of our
Stein Mart locations. Advertising expense, net of co-operative advertising
reimbursements, decreased $16.8 million from 2006 to 2007. SG&A expenses in
2007 also included $16.5 million recorded in the licensing, other and
eliminations segment related to the termination of two former executive
officers. SG&A expenses in 2006 included $4.3 million recorded in the
wholesale better apparel segment related to the closing of the Secaucus
warehouse, $1.2 million recorded in the retail segment related to the closing of
our Stein Mart retail locations, $2.3 million recorded in the wholesale moderate
apparel segment related to the closing of our Mexican production facilities,
$10.0 million recorded in the wholesale footwear and accessories segment related
to the termination of a former executive officer and the settlement of
litigation concerning a license agreement. SG&A expenses in 2006 also
included $2.6 million in the retail segment and $0.9 million recorded in the
licensing, other and eliminations segment related to the termination of the
former executive officer.
Impairment Losses and Other
Items. As a result of our annual goodwill impairment analyses, we
recorded goodwill impairments of $78.0 and $441.2 million in 2007 and 2006,
respectively, as a result of decreases in projected revenues and profitability
for certain moderate apparel brands. As a result of our annual trademark
impairment analyses, we recorded trademark impairment charges of $7.5 and $50.2
million in 2007 and 2006, respectively, as a result of decreases in projected
revenues for certain moderate apparel brands. We also recorded trademark
impairment charges of $80.5 million in 2007 as a result of our decision to
discontinue our Norton McNaughton brand and significantly reduce the
scale of our Erika brand. For more information, see "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets" in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2007, we sold our interest
in our Australian joint venture for $20.7 million, which resulted in a gain of
$8.2 million (see "Joint Ventures" in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements). During 2006, we recorded a $17.4 million gain (net of associated
costs) upon the sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited (see "Gain on Sale
of Stock in Rubicon Retail Limited" in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements).
Operating Loss. The
resulting operating loss from continuing operations for 2007 was $27.0 million
compared with $220.0 million for 2006, due to the factors described above and
the loss of the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business in 2006.
Net Interest Expense.
Net interest expense was $47.8 million in 2007 compared with $47.0 million in
2006.
Benefit for Income Taxes.
The effective income tax rate benefit on continuing operations was 178.4% and
28.5% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. Excluding the effects of the reversal of
the deferred tax valuation allowance related to the sale of Barneys ($107.7
million) and the goodwill impairment, the effective tax rate on continuing
operations was 17.0% for 2007. Without the effects of the Polo Jeans Company
sale, the goodwill impairment, the litigation settlement and the gain on the
sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited, the effective tax rate on continuing
operations was 34.0% for 2006. The change from 2006 to 2007 was primarily driven
by a greater impact of the foreign income tax differential relative to pre-tax
income in 2007 than in 2006.
Discontinued Operations. Income
from discontinued operations for 2007 includes a $254.2 million after-tax gain
on the sale of Barneys and $11.0 million of net income from the operation of
Barneys prior to the sale (see "Discontinued Operations" in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements), compared to $29.0 million
- 38 -
of net income from the operation of Barneys in 2006. The decrease in net
income from the operation of Barneys is primarily due to the results of Barneys
being included in the current year only through September 5, 2007.
Net Income (Loss) and
Earnings (Loss) Per Share. Net income was $311.1 million in 2007
compared with a net loss of $144.1 million in 2006. Diluted earnings per share
for 2007 was $3.07 compared with a loss per share of $(1.30) for 2006, on 8.4%
fewer shares outstanding.
2006 Compared with 2005
Revenues. Total
revenues for 2006 were $4.09 billion compared with $4.53 billion for 2005, a
decrease of 9.8%. Revenues by segment were as follows:
(In millions)
|
2006
|
2005
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
Percent
Change
|
Wholesale better apparel |
$ 1,127.4
|
$ 1,438.2
|
$
(310.8)
|
(21.6%)
|
Wholesale moderate apparel |
1,142.0
|
1,265.2
|
(123.2)
|
(9.7%)
|
Wholesale footwear and accessories |
941.1
|
978.6
|
(37.5)
|
(3.8%)
|
Retail |
822.7 |
791.3 |
31.4 |
4.0% |
Licensing and other |
53.8
|
58.9
|
(5.1)
|
(8.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
$ 4,087.0
|
$ 4,532.2
|
$
(445.2)
|
(9.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale better apparel revenues
decreased primarily due to the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business
($278.9 million of the decrease) and the discontinuance of our Easy Spirit
apparel line, which we discontinued due to poor retail performance, and our Jones
New York Country apparel line, which we discontinued because we were
offering similar products under our Jones New York Signature brand.
Decreases in shipments of our Jones New York Sport product line as a
result of order reductions from its largest customer were partially offset by
increased customer orders for our Nine West apparel product line.
Wholesale moderate apparel
revenues decreased primarily due to decreased shipments of our l.e.i.,
Joneswear, Nine & Co., Norton McNaughton and Bandolino product
lines (where customers are replacing these brands in their locations with
private-label and other products) and the discontinuance by our wholesale
customers of their exclusive A|Line, Joneswear Jeans, C.L.O.T.H.E.S. and Latina
product lines. These decreases were partially offset by increased shipments
resulting from higher customer orders for our Gloria Vanderbilt and GLO
product lines and increased shipments of private label products, including the
new Duckhead product line.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
revenues decreased due to (1) decreased shipments of our Nine West
accessory product line due to poor performance and retail consolidations; (2)
decreased shipments of our Enzo Angiolini, Sam & Libby and Easy
Spirit footwear product lines (primarily due to retail consolidations and
reduced customer orders); (3) discontinuance of the Bandolino and
l.e.i. costume jewelry product lines due to poor retail performance; and (4)
discontinuance of the licensed Tommy Hilfiger costume jewelry product
line as a result of the termination of the licensing arrangement. These
decreases were partially offset by increased shipments of our Anne Klein
and Circa Joan & David footwear product lines due to higher customer
orders resulting from strong product performance at retail and an increase in
our international footwear business.
Retail revenues increased due to
$29.2 million of revenues from new store openings and $5.5 million of additional
revenues resulting from a 0.8% increase in comparable store sales. Excluding
Barneys, we began 2006 with 1,060 retail locations and had a net increase of 40
locations during the period to end the period with 1,100 locations.
Revenues for 2006 also include
$17.4 million of service fees charged to Polo under a short-term transition
service agreement entered into with Polo at the time of the sale of the Polo
Jeans Company business. These revenues are based on contractual monthly and
per-unit fees as set forth in the agreement. Of this amount,
- 39 -
$11.7 million was
recorded in the wholesale better apparel segment, $3.1 million was recorded in
the wholesale moderate apparel segment and $2.6 million was recorded in the
licensing and other segment.
Gross Profit. The gross profit margin was 34.6% in 2006 and
34.9% in 2005.
Wholesale better apparel gross
profit margins were 36.5% and 34.6% for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increase was due to lower levels of sales to off-price retailers, lower
production costs and lower levels of air freight, partially offset by reduced
sales of higher-margin Polo Jeans Company products as a result of the
sale of the Polo Jeans Company business.
Wholesale moderate apparel gross
profit margins were 21.2% and 23.0% for 2006 and 2005, respectively. Increased
margins in our Gloria Vanderbilt and GLO product lines were offset
by higher levels of sales to off-price retailers, higher levels of air freight
and excess capacity in our Mexican manufacturing operations.
Wholesale footwear and accessories
gross profit margins were 28.6% and 31.0% for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
decrease was a result of lower net sales in the higher-margin wholesale jewelry
business, higher net sales in our lower-margin international business, higher
levels of air freight and sales to off-price retailers, markdowns related to the
discontinuance of the licensed Tommy Hilfiger jewelry line in the current
period and writedowns of excess inventory in our direct selling jewelry and
accessory business.
Retail gross profit margins were
51.4% and 53.1% for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease was the result of
a higher level of promotional activity in our footwear and accessories stores to
liquidate excess inventory and the liquidation of inventory related to the
closing of our Stein Mart locations in 2006.
SG&A Expenses.
SG&A expenses were $1.10 billion in 2006 and $1.13 billion in 2005. A $59.1
million decrease due to the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business and
headcount reductions as a result of our strategic initiatives were offset by
$17.6 million of increased expenses resulting from the opening of new retail
stores, $4.3 million recorded in the wholesale better apparel segment in the
current period related to the closing of the Secaucus warehouse, $1.2 million
recorded in the retail segment related to the closing of our Stein Mart retail
locations, $2.3 million recorded in the wholesale moderate apparel segment
related to the closing of our Mexican production facilities and $10.0 million
recorded in the wholesale footwear and accessories segment related to the
termination of a former executive officer and the settlement of litigation
concerning a license agreement. SG&A expenses for 2006 also included $2.6
million in the retail segment and $0.9 million recorded in the licensing, other
and eliminations segment related to the termination of the former executive
officer. SG&A expenses for 2005 included approximately $3.1 million as a
result of an arbitration award to a former employee, approximately $3.6 million
related to the closing of our Bristol warehouse facility and $1.7 million
related to the denim restructuring in the wholesale moderate apparel segment,
offset by one-time gains of $5.1 million in the better wholesale apparel segment
as a result of a recovery of unauthorized markdown allowances from Saks
Incorporated (relating to sales made by Kasper prior to the date of acquisition)
and $5.2 million in the retail segment from a landlord repurchase of a retail
store operating lease.
Impairment Losses and Other
Items. We recorded goodwill impairments of $441.2 million in 2006 as a
result of decreases in projected revenues and profitability for our Norton
McNaughton, l.e.i. and certain other moderate apparel brands as well
as changes in business strategy with respect to our Norton McNaughton
brand. We also recorded trademark impairment charges of $50.2 million in 2006,
primarily as a result of decreases in projected revenues for our Norton
McNaughton brand, our Albert Nipon better apparel brand, our Westies
and Sam & Libby footwear brands and our Richelieu costume
jewelry brand in 2006. For more information, see "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2006, we also recorded a
$17.4 million gain (net of associated costs) upon the sale of stock in Rubicon
Retail Limited (see "Gain on Sale of Stock in Rubicon Retail Limited"
in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Operating (Loss) Income.
The resulting operating loss from continuing operations for 2006 was $220.0
million compared with operating income of $453.5 million for 2005, due to the
factors described above and the loss of the sale of the Polo Jeans Company
business.
- 40 -
Net Interest Expense.
Net interest expense was $47.0 million in 2006 compared with $69.9 million in
2005. The decrease was primarily the result of lower average borrowings during
2006 and the redemption at maturity of our 7.875% Senior Notes in June 2006.
(Benefit) Provision for
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate on continuing
operations was 28.6% for 2006 and 34.6% for 2005. The difference was primarily
driven by the net tax effects associated with the sale of the Polo Jeans
Company business, the goodwill impairment, the litigation settlement and the
gain on the sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited. Without the effects of the Polo
Jeans Company sale, the goodwill impairment, the litigation settlement and
the gain on the sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited, the effective tax rate
for 2006 was 33.9%. The change from 2005 to 2006 was primarily driven by
favorable resolutions of the 2001 to 2003 federal and various state income tax
audits that resulted in the reversal of $8.6 million of prior income tax
accruals.
Cumulative Effect of Change
in Accounting for Share-Based Payment. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R
required us to change from recognizing the effect of forfeitures of unvested
employee stock options and restricted stock as they occur to estimating the
number of outstanding instruments for which the requisite service is not
expected to be rendered. As a result, we recorded a gain of $1.9 million (net of
$1.2 million in taxes) on January 1, 2006 as a cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle.
Discontinued Operations.
Net income from the operation of Barneys for 2006 and 2005 was $29.0 million
and $21.5 million, respectively (see Discontinued Operations" in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements). The increase is primarily due to a 9.9%
increase in comparable store sales ($53.2 million of additional revenue) and the
opening of two flagship and four CO-OP locations in 2006.
Net (Loss) Income and (Loss)
Earnings Per Share. Net loss was $144.1 million in 2006 compared with
net income of $274.3 million earned in 2005. Diluted (loss) earnings per share
for 2006 was $(1.30) compared with $2.30 for 2005, on 7.2% fewer shares
outstanding.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital requirements
have been to fund acquisitions, pay dividends, working capital needs, capital
expenditures and repurchases of our common stock on the open market. We have
historically relied on internally generated funds, trade credit, bank borrowings
and the issuance of notes to finance our operations and expansion. As of
December 31, 2007, total cash and cash equivalents were $302.8 million, an
increase of $231.3 million from the $71.5 million reported as of December 31,
2006 (including $7.2 million reported under assets held for sale).
Operating activities of continuing
operations provided $120.5 million, $386.4 million and $367.7 million in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
The $265.9 million decrease in net
cash provided by operating activities from 2006 to 2007 was primarily the result
of changes in working capital. Income taxes payable decreased primarily as a
result of the tax effects of the Barneys sale. Accounts receivable experienced a
smaller decrease in 2007 than in 2006 and accounts payable decreased in 2007
compared to an increase in 2006 primarily due to the effects from the sale of
the Polo Jeans Company business and the timing of payments for inventory
in 2006.
The $18.7 million decrease in net
cash provided by operating activities from 2005 to 2006 was primarily the result
of lower operating income before non-cash impairment charges offset by changes
in certain components of working capital. Accounts receivable decreased in 2006
compared to an increase in 2005, primarily as a result of lower wholesale
moderate apparel sales in the current period and the effects of the sale of the Polo
Jeans Company business. Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other
current liabilities experienced increases in 2006 compared to decreases in 2005,
primarily as a result of accruals for property, plant and equipment related to
new store openings and computer systems and changes in payment terms to certain
vendors. These effects were offset by a decrease in taxes payable in 2006
compared to an increase in 2005, primarily as a result of the payment of federal
and state audit settlements and the reversal of prior years' income tax audit
accruals in the current period, and an increase in inventories in 2006 compared
to a
- 41 -
decrease in 2005, primarily the result of new store openings in 2006 and
anticipated sales growth for early 2007.
Investing activities of continuing
operations provided $758.0 million and $258.8 million in 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and used $68.0 million in 2005. The changes were primarily due to
net cash received from the sale of Barneys in 2007 compared to the net cash
received from the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business in 2006.
Capital expenditures, which amounted to $111.2 million in 2007, are expected to
be approximately $90 million for 2008, primarily for retail store construction
and remodeling and the implementation of new computer systems.
Financing activities of continuing
operations used $667.4 million in 2007, primarily to repurchase our common stock
and repay $100.0 million of net borrowings under our Senior Credit Facilities.
We repurchased $496.9 million,
$306.2 million and $235.2 million of our common stock during 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, $303.1 million of Board authorized
repurchases was still available. We may make additional share repurchases in the
future depending on, among other things, market conditions and our financial
condition. During the term of the ASR program, we must obtain the consent of
Goldman to make any additional share repurchases. For further information see
"Common Stock" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our Board of Directors has
authorized our common stock repurchases as a tax-effective means to enhance
shareholder value and distribute cash to shareholders and, to a lesser extent,
to offset the impact of dilution resulting from the issuance of employee stock
options and shares of restricted stock. We believe that we have sufficient
sources of funds to repurchase shares without significantly impacting our
short-term or long-term liquidity. In authorizing future share repurchase
programs, our Board of Directors gives careful consideration to both our
projected cash flows and our existing capital resources.
Financing activities of continuing
operations used $608.8 million in 2006, primarily to redeem at maturity our
outstanding 7.875% Senior Notes due 2005 at par on June 15, 2006 (for a total
payment of $225.0 million), repurchase our common stock and pay dividends to our
common shareholders and repay $29.5 million of net borrowings under our Senior
Credit Facilities.
Financing activities of continuing
operations used $315.5 million in 2005, primarily to redeem at maturity our
outstanding 8.375% Senior Notes due 2005 at par on August 15, 2005 (for a total
payment of $129.6 million) and repurchase our common stock and pay dividends to
our common shareholders, offset by $60.3 million in net borrowings under our
Senior Credit Facilities.
Proceeds from the issuance of
common stock to our employees exercising stock options amounted to $11.1
million, $32.4 million and $13.4 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
At December 31, 2007, we had
credit agreements with several lending institutions to borrow an aggregate
principal amount of up to $1.75 billion under Senior Credit Facilities. These
facilities, of which the entire amount is available for letters of credit or
cash borrowings, provide for a $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility
that expires in June 2009 and a $750.0 million five-year revolving credit
facility that expires in June 2010. At December 31, 2007, $154.5 million was
outstanding under the credit facility that expires in June 2009 (comprised
solely of outstanding letters of credit) and no amounts were outstanding under
the credit facility that expires in June 2010. Borrowings under the Senior
Credit Facilities may also be used for working capital and other general
corporate purposes, including permitted acquisitions and stock repurchases. The
Senior Credit Facilities are unsecured and require us to satisfy both a coverage
ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent to
interest expense plus rents and a net worth maintenance covenant, as well as
other restrictions, including (subject to exceptions) limitations on our ability
to incur additional indebtedness, prepay subordinated indebtedness, make
acquisitions, enter into mergers and pay dividends. As of December 31, 2007, we
are in compliance with all such covenants.
At December 31, 2007, we also had
a C$10.0 million unsecured line of credit in Canada, under which C$0.2 million
of letters of credit were outstanding.
- 42 -
On September 10, 2007, Standard
& Poor's announced it had downgraded its senior unsecured rating on our
outstanding senior notes from BBB- to BB+, and on September 27, 2007, Moody's
announced it had downgraded its senior unsecured rating on our outstanding
senior notes from Baa3 to Ba1. Both rating agencies maintain a negative outlook.
We recorded net pension and
postretirement liability gains of $4.5 million to other comprehensive income in
2007 resulting primarily from the amortization of actuarial gains. We recorded
net pension and postretirement losses of $1.8 million in 2006 to other
comprehensive income resulting primarily from the amortization of actuarial
losses and lower than expected returns on our plan assets. We recorded net
pension and postretirement gains of $0.2 million in 2005. Our pension and
postretirement plans are currently underfunded by a total of $8.6 million. As
the benefits under our defined benefit pension plans are frozen with respect to
service credits, the effects on future pension expense are not anticipated to be
material to our results of operations or to our liquidity.
On February 13, 2008, we announced
that the Board of Directors had declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per
share to all common stockholders of record as of February 29, 2008 for payment
on March 14, 2008.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance
sheet arrangements within the meaning of SEC Regulation S-K Item 303(a)(4).
Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
The following is a summary of our
significant contractual obligations for the periods indicated that existed as of
December 31, 2007, and, except for purchase obligations and other long-term
liabilities, is based on information appearing in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements (amounts in millions). All amounts exclude items related to
discontinued operations.
|
Total
|
Less than
1 year
|
1 - 3
years
|
3 - 5
years
|
More than
5 years
|
Long-term debt |
$ 750.0 |
$
- |
$ 250.0 |
$
- |
$ 500.0 |
Interest on long-term debt |
519.5 |
38.7 |
65.6 |
56.2 |
359.0 |
Capital lease
obligations |
49.3 |
7.0 |
9.5 |
7.0 |
25.8 |
Operating lease obligations
(1) |
807.3 |
122.8 |
229.9 |
180.4 |
274.2 |
Purchase obligations (2) |
612.1 |
594.0 |
11.1 |
7.0 |
- |
Minimum royalty payments
(3) |
1.3 |
1.3 |
- |
- |
- |
Capital expenditure
commitments |
28.8
|
28.8
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Deferred compensation |
12.0
|
12.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Other long-term liabilities |
66.5
|
0.7
|
13.0
|
11.3
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
(4) |
$ 2,846.8
|
$ 805.3
|
$ 579.1
|
$ 261.9
|
$ 1,200.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Future rental commitments for
leases have not been reduced by minimum non-cancelable sublease rentals
aggregating $25.7 million.
|
(2)
|
Includes outstanding letters
of credit of $154.7million, which primarily represent inventory
purchase commitments which typically mature in two to six months.
|
(3) |
Under exclusive licenses to
manufacture certain items under trademarks not owned by us pursuant to
various license agreements, we are obligated to pay the licensors a
percentage of our net sales of these licensed products, subject to
minimum scheduled royalty and advertising payments.
|
(4) |
Excludes $16.7 million of
uncertain tax positions, for which we cannot make reasonably reliable
estimates of the timing and amounts to be paid. |
- 43 -
We believe that funds generated by
operations, proceeds from the issuance of notes, the Senior Credit Facilities
and the Canadian line of credit will provide the financial resources sufficient
to meet our foreseeable working capital, dividend, capital expenditure and stock
repurchase requirements and fund our contractual obligations and our contingent
liabilities and commitments.
New Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48"), "Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109," which
establishes that the financial statement effects of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return are to be recognized in the financial
statements when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that
the position will be sustained upon examination. FIN 48 also provides guidance
on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition.
We adopted FIN 48 on January 1,
2007. On that date, we had no uncertain tax positions. We recognize interest and
penalties, if any, as part of our provision for income taxes in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations. We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return
as well as unitary and combined income tax returns in several state
jurisdictions, of which California is the most significant. Our subsidiaries
also file separate company income tax returns in multiple states, of which New
York is the most significant.
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," which establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 is not expected to have a material
impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115," which
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair
value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements
designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159
does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets
and liabilities to be carried at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the
beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15,
2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 is not expected to have a material impact on
our results of operations or our financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No.
141(R)"), which requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest of an acquiree at the
acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited
exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is
prohibited. At the date of adoption, SFAS No. 141(R) is not expected to have a
material impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No.160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements," which requires (1) ownership interests in subsidiaries held by
parties other than the parent to be clearly identified, labeled, and presented
in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate
from the parent's equity; (2) the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly
identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income;
and (3) changes in a parent's ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently
as equity transactions. SFAS No. 160 applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier
application is prohibited. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have
a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
- 44 -
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
We are exposed to the impact of
interest rate changes, foreign currency fluctuations, and changes in the market
value of our fixed rate long-term debt. We manage this exposure through regular
operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use
of derivative financial instruments. Our policy allows the use of derivative
financial instruments for identifiable market risk exposures, including interest
rate and foreign currency fluctuations. We do not enter into derivative
financial contracts for trading or other speculative purposes. The following
quantitative disclosures were derived using quoted market prices, yields and
theoretical pricing models obtained through independent pricing sources for the
same or similar types of financial instruments, taking into consideration the
underlying terms, such as the coupon rate, term to maturity and imbedded call
options. Certain items such as lease contracts, insurance contracts, and
obligations for pension and other post-retirement benefits were not included in
the analysis. For further information see "Derivatives" and
"Financial Instruments" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Interest Rates
Our primary interest rate
exposures relate to our the fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt and
interest expense related to our revolving credit facility.
At December 31, 2007, the fair
value of our fixed rate debt was $655.3 million. On that date, the potential
decrease in fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt instruments resulting
from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in interest rates was approximately $59.6
million.
Our primary interest rate
exposures on variable rate credit facilities are with respect to United States
and Canadian short-term rates. Cash borrowings under these facilities bear
interest at rates that vary with changes in prevailing market rates. At December
31, 2007, we had approximately $1.8 billion in variable rate credit facilities,
under which no cash borrowings were outstanding.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
We are exposed to market risk
related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our products have
historically been purchased from foreign manufacturers in pre-set United States
dollar prices. To date, we generally have not been materially adversely affected
by fluctuations in exchange rates. We also have assets and liabilities
denominated in certain foreign currencies.
At December 31, 2007, we had
outstanding foreign exchange contracts to exchange Canadian Dollars for a total
notional value of US $24.4 million at a weighted-average exchange rate of 1.0653
through December 2008. The fair value of these contracts at December 31, 2007
was a $1.8 million unrealized loss. We believe that these financial instruments
should not subject us to undue risk due to foreign exchange movements because
gains and losses on these contracts should offset losses and gains on the
assets, liabilities, and transactions being hedged. We are exposed to
credit-related losses if the counterparty to a financial instrument fails to
perform its obligation. However, we do not expect the counterparties, which
presently have high credit ratings, to fail to meet their obligations.
- 45 -
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
February 22, 2008
To the Stockholders of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
The management of Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. is responsible for the preparation, integrity, objectivity and fair
presentation of the financial statements and other financial information
presented in this report. The financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and reflect the effects of certain judgments and estimates made by
management.
In order to ensure that our
internal control over financial reporting is effective, management regularly
assesses such controls and did so most recently for our financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007. This assessment was based on criteria for effective
internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission, referred to as COSO. Our assessment included the
documentation and understanding of our internal control over financial
reporting. We have evaluated the design effectiveness and tested the operating
effectiveness of internal controls to form our conclusion.
Our internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that pertain to maintaining records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions
of assets, providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, assuring that receipts and
expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of our management
and directors and providing reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could
have a material effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Based on this assessment, the
undersigned officers concluded that our internal controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be
included in our periodic SEC filings and that information required to be
disclosed by us in these periodic filings is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and
that our internal controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that
our financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
The Audit Committee of our Board
of Directors, which consists of independent, non-executive directors, meets
regularly with management, the internal auditors and the independent accountants
to review accounting, reporting, auditing and internal control matters. The
committee has direct and private access to both internal and external auditors.
BDO Seidman, LLP, the independent
registered public accounting firm who audits our financial statements, has
audited our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007
and has expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
|
Wesley R. Card
President and Chief Executive Officer |
John T. McClain
Chief Financial Officer |
- 46 -
|
BDO Seidman, LLP
Accountants and Consultants |
330 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 885-8000
Fax: (212) 697-1299 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
New York, New York
We have audited Jones Apparel Group's internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Jones Apparel
Group's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Jones Apparel Group, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 and our report
dated February 19, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
New York, New York
February 19, 2008
- 47 -
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
BDO Seidman, LLP
Accountants and Consultants |
330 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 885-8000
Fax: (212) 697-1299 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
New York, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Jones Apparel Group's internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report
dated February 19, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
New York, New York
February 19, 2008
- 48 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(All amounts in millions except per share data)
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ 302.8
|
$ 64.3
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
337.0
|
357.8
|
|
Inventories
|
523.9
|
530.8
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
-
|
620.8
|
|
Prepaid income taxes
|
30.6
|
14.1
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
33.9
|
53.7
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
65.9
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT
ASSETS |
1,294.1
|
1,709.0
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
312.1
|
279.5
|
GOODWILL |
973.9
|
1,051.9
|
OTHER
INTANGIBLES, at cost, less
accumulated amortization |
618.0
|
708.3
|
OTHER ASSETS |
38.5
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,236.6
|
$ 3,801.1
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
$
-
|
$ 100.0
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
4.8
|
4.1
|
|
Accounts payable
|
223.6
|
277.9
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
|
-
|
180.7
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
20.4
|
25.4
|
|
Accrued employee compensation
and benefits
|
40.0
|
41.6
|
|
Accrued restructuring and
severance payments
|
23.0
|
11.3
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
83.8
|
83.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
395.6
|
724.8
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
749.4
|
749.3
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
28.3
|
35.8
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
-
|
7.8
|
|
Other
|
66.5
|
71.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
844.2
|
864.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
1,239.8
|
1,589.5
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES |
- |
- |
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value - shares authorized 1.0; none issued |
-
|
-
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value - shares authorized 200.0; issued
153.6 and 153.2 |
1.5
|
1.5
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
1,339.7
|
1,320.0
|
|
Retained earnings |
2,480.8
|
2,226.4
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
2.1
|
(5.9)
|
|
Less treasury stock, 68.3
and 45.3 shares, at cost |
(1,827.3)
|
(1,330.4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY |
1,996.8
|
2,211.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,236.6
|
$
3,801.1
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements |
|
|
- 49 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(All amounts in millions except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
Net sales |
$ 3,793.3
|
$ 4,014.8
|
$ 4,473.3
|
Licensing income |
52.0
|
51.1
|
58.9
|
Service and other revenue |
3.2
|
21.1
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
3,848.5
|
4,087.0
|
4,532.2
|
Cost of goods sold |
2,609.1
|
2,674.2
|
2,950.4
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
1,239.4
|
1,412.8
|
1,581.8
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
1,100.4
|
1,096.3
|
1,128.3
|
Loss on sale of Polo Jeans Company business |
-
|
45.1
|
-
|
Trademark impairments |
88.0
|
50.2
|
-
|
Goodwill impairment |
78.0
|
441.2
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
(27.0)
|
(220.0)
|
453.5
|
Interest income |
3.7
|
3.5
|
1.1
|
Interest expense and financing costs |
51.5
|
50.5
|
71.0
|
Gain on sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
-
|
17.4
|
-
|
Gain on sale of interest in Australian joint venture |
8.2
|
-
|
-
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
8.1
|
4.5
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
(58.5)
|
(245.1)
|
386.8
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(104.4)
|
(70.1)
|
134.0
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
45.9
|
(175.0)
|
252.8
|
Income from discontinued operations,
including gain on sale of Barneys in 2007, net of tax |
265.2
|
29.0
|
21.5
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for share-based payments, net of tax |
-
|
1.9
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
$ 311.1
|
$ (144.1)
|
$ 274.3
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
$
0.46 |
$
(1.58) |
$
2.15 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
2.65 |
0.26 |
0.18 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for share-based payments, net of tax |
- |
0.02 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$
3.11 |
$
(1.30) |
$
2.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ 0.45 |
$ (1.58) |
$ 2.12 |
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
2.62 |
0.26 |
0.18 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for share-based payments, net of tax |
- |
0.02 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ 3.07 |
$ (1.30) |
$ 2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
99.9 |
110.6 |
118.0 |
|
|
Diluted |
101.3 |
110.6 |
119.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
$
0.56 |
$
0.50 |
$
0.44 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
- 50 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'
Equity
(All amounts in millions except per share data)
|
Number of
common
shares
outstanding
|
|
Total
stock-
holders'
equity
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
Accumu-
lated
other
compre-
hensive
income
(loss)
|
|
Treasury
stock
|
Balance,
January 1, 2005 |
122.2
|
|
$
2,653.9
|
|
$
1.5
|
|
$
1,236.4
|
|
$
2,204.2
|
|
$
0.8
|
|
$
(789.0)
|
Year ended December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
- |
|
274.3
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
274.3
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Minimum
pension liability adjustment |
- |
|
0.2
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
0.2 |
|
- |
|
Change in fair value of
cash flow hedges, net of $1.5 tax |
- |
|
(2.3)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
(2.3) |
|
- |
|
Reclassification adjustment for hedge gains and losses included in net income,
net of $1.8 tax |
- |
|
(2.8)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
(2.8) |
|
- |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
- |
|
(2.4)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
(2.4) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income |
|
|
267.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of
restricted stock to employees, net of forfeitures |
0.7 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Amortization
expense in connection with employee stock options and restricted stock |
- |
|
18.3
|
|
- |
|
18.3 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Exercise of
employee stock options |
0.6 |
|
13.4
|
|
- |
|
13.4 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Excess
tax
benefit derived from exercise of employee stock options and vesting of
restricted stock |
- |
|
1.3
|
|
- |
|
1.3 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Dividends on
common stock ($0.44 per share) |
-
|
|
(52.3)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(52.3)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Treasury stock
acquired |
(7.6)
|
|
(235.2)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(235.2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2005 |
115.9
|
|
2,666.4
|
|
1.5
|
|
1,269.4
|
|
2,426.2
|
|
(6.5)
|
|
(1,024.2)
|
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
- |
|
(144.1)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
(144.1)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Pension
and postretirement liability adjustments, net of $0.7 tax |
- |
|
(1.1)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
(1.1) |
|
- |
|
Change in fair value of
cash flow hedges, net of $1.5 tax |
- |
|
2.1
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
2.1 |
|
- |
|
Reclassification adjustment for hedge gains and losses included in net
loss,
net of $0.6 tax |
- |
|
(1.1)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
(1.1) |
|
- |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
- |
|
0.7
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
0.7 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(143.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting for share-based payments |
- |
|
(3.1)
|
|
- |
|
(3.1) |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Issuance of
restricted stock to employees, net of forfeitures |
0.5 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Amortization
expense in connection with employee stock options and restricted stock |
- |
|
17.9
|
|
- |
|
17.9 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Exercise of
employee stock options |
1.3 |
|
32.4
|
|
- |
|
32.4 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Excess tax
benefit derived from exercise of employee stock options and vesting of
restricted stock |
- |
|
3.4
|
|
- |
|
3.4 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Dividends on
common stock ($0.50 per share) |
-
|
|
(55.7)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(55.7)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Treasury stock
acquired |
(9.8)
|
|
(306.2)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(306.2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2006 |
107.9
|
|
2,211.6
|
|
1.5
|
|
1,320.0
|
|
2,226.4
|
|
(5.9)
|
|
(1,330.4)
|
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
- |
|
311.1
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
311.1
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Pension
and postretirement liability adjustments, net of $1.7 tax |
- |
|
2.9
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
2.9 |
|
- |
|
Change in fair value of
cash flow hedges, net of $1.8 tax |
- |
|
(2.5)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
(2.5) |
|
- |
|
Reclassification adjustment for hedge gains and losses included in net
income,
net of $0.4 tax |
- |
|
0.5
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
0.5 |
|
- |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
- |
|
7.6
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
7.6 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income |
|
|
319.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of sale of Barneys |
- |
|
(0.5)
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
(0.5) |
|
- |
Forfeitures of
restricted stock by employees, net of issuances |
(0.2) |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Amortization
expense in connection with employee stock options and restricted stock |
- |
|
7.2
|
|
- |
|
7.2 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Exercise of
employee stock options |
0.6 |
|
11.1
|
|
- |
|
11.1 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Excess tax
benefit derived from exercise of employee stock options and vesting of
restricted stock |
- |
|
1.4
|
|
- |
|
1.4 |
|
-
|
|
- |
|
- |
Dividends on
common stock ($0.56 per share) |
-
|
|
(57.2)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(57.2)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Treasury stock
acquired |
(23.0)
|
|
(496.9)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(496.9)
|
Other |
- |
|
0.5
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.5
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2007 |
85.3
|
|
$
1,996.8
|
|
$
1.5
|
|
$
1,339.7
|
|
$
2,480.8
|
|
$
2.1
|
|
$
(1,827.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
- 51 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(All amounts in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
$ 311.1
|
$(144.1)
|
$ 274.3
|
|
Less:
Income from discontinued operations |
(265.2)
|
(29.0)
|
(21.5)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for
share-based payments, net of
tax |
-
|
(1.9)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
45.9
|
(175.0)
|
252.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities, net of
acquisitions and divestitures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
on sale of Polo Jeans Company business
|
- |
45.1 |
- |
|
|
Gain on sale of
stock in Rubicon Retail Limited
|
- |
(17.4) |
- |
|
|
Impairment losses on
property, plant and equipment
|
2.1 |
8.6 |
- |
|
|
Trademark impairments
|
88.0 |
50.2 |
- |
|
|
Goodwill Impairment
|
78.0 |
441.2 |
- |
|
|
Amortization expense
in connection with employee stock options and restricted stock
|
14.0 |
12.8 |
16.6 |
|
|
Depreciation and other amortization
|
76.5 |
73.6 |
69.8 |
|
|
Gain on sale of
interest in Australian joint venture
|
(8.2) |
- |
- |
|
|
Equity in earnings
of unconsolidated affiliates
|
(8.1) |
(4.5) |
(3.2) |
|
|
Dividends
received from unconsolidated affiliates
|
2.6 |
- |
1.3 |
|
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
|
0.2 |
(0.8) |
(0.3) |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
8.7 |
(142.5) |
35.6 |
|
|
Losses on
sales of property, plant and equipment
|
4.0 |
1.8 |
5.0 |
|
|
Other
items, net
|
(1.8) |
(0.6) |
(1.5) |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
22.5
|
56.8
|
(2.9)
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
9.6
|
9.0
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1.2
|
(3.8)
|
(0.7)
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
1.7
|
2.3
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
(55.5)
|
55.5
|
(6.3)
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable/prepaid
income taxes |
(170.7)
|
(41.0)
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities |
4.9
|
9.6
|
(34.1)
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
4.9
|
5.5
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
74.6
|
561.4
|
114.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
of continuing operations |
120.5
|
386.4
|
367.7
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
operating activities of discontinued operations |
39.0
|
37.5
|
59.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
159.5
|
423.9
|
427.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of Barneys, net of cash sold and selling costs |
845.5
|
-
|
-
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale of Polo Jeans Company business |
-
|
350.6
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of interest in Australian joint venture |
20.7
|
-
|
-
|
|
Net cash received on
sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
-
|
17.4
|
-
|
|
Payments
relating to acquisition of Barneys |
-
|
-
|
(4.1)
|
|
Capital expenditures |
(111.2)
|
(109.3)
|
(66.9)
|
|
Acquisition of intangibles |
-
|
-
|
(0.1)
|
|
Capital
contributions to unconsolidated affiliates |
-
|
-
|
(0.7)
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
3.0
|
0.1
|
3.6
|
|
Other |
-
|
-
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations |
758.0
|
258.8
|
(68.0)
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
of discontinued operations |
(40.5)
|
(61.2)
|
(20.6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities |
717.5
|
197.6
|
(88.6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
Redemption at
maturity of 8.375% Senior Notes |
-
|
-
|
(129.6)
|
|
Redemption at
maturity of 7.875% Senior Notes |
-
|
(225.0)
|
-
|
|
Net
(repayment) borrowing under credit facilities |
(100.0)
|
(29.5)
|
60.3
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
(496.9)
|
(306.2)
|
(235.2)
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options |
11.1
|
32.4
|
13.4
|
|
Dividends paid |
(57.2)
|
(55.7)
|
(52.3)
|
|
Net cash
transferred (to) from discontinued operations |
(21.7)
|
(24.0)
|
32.9
|
|
Debt
issuance costs |
-
|
-
|
(0.6)
|
|
Principal payments on capital leases |
(4.1)
|
(4.2)
|
(4.4)
|
|
Excess tax benefits
from share-based payment arrangement |
1.4
|
3.4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
of continuing operations |
(667.4)
|
(608.8)
|
(315.5)
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities of discontinued operations |
17.9
|
24.0
|
(32.9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
(649.5)
|
(584.8)
|
(348.4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH |
3.8
|
(0.1)
|
(0.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
231.3 |
36.6 |
(10.1) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING,
including $7.2, $6.9 and $3.7 reported under assets held for sale in 2007,
2006 and
2005 |
71.5
|
34.9
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING,
including $7.2 and $6.9 reported under assets held for sale in 2006 and
2005 |
$
302.8
|
$
71.5
|
$ 34.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
- 52 -
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and our
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated. The results of operations of acquired
companies are included in our operating results from the respective dates of
acquisition.
We design, contract for the
manufacture of and market a broad range of women's collection sportswear,
suits and dresses, casual sportswear and jeanswear for women and children, and
women's footwear and accessories. We sell our products through a broad array
of distribution channels, including better specialty and department stores and
mass merchandisers, primarily in the United States and Canada. We also operate
our own network of retail and factory outlet stores. In addition, we license the
use of several of our brand names to select manufacturers and distributors of
women's and men's apparel and accessories worldwide.
The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.
In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," the assets and liabilities relating to Barneys have been
reclassified as held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods
presented and the results of operations of Barneys for the current and prior
periods have been reported as discontinued operations. We classify as
discontinued operations for all periods presented any component of our business
that we believe is probable of being sold or has been sold that has operations
and cash flows that are clearly distinguishable operationally and for financial
reporting purposes. For those components, we have no significant continuing
involvement after disposal and their operations and cash flows are eliminated
from our ongoing operations. Sales of significant components of our business not
classified as discontinued operations are reported as a component of income from
continuing operations.
Credit Risk
Financial instruments which
potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist principally of
temporary cash investments and accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash
equivalents in investment-grade, short-term debt instruments with high quality
financial institutions and the U.S. Government and, by policy, limit the amount
of credit exposure in any one financial instrument. We perform ongoing credit
evaluations of our customers' financial condition and, generally, require no
collateral from our customers. The allowance for non-collection of accounts
receivable is based upon the expected collectibility of all accounts receivable.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Our primary objectives for
holding derivative financial instruments are to manage foreign currency and
interest rate risks. We do not use financial instruments for trading or other
speculative purposes. We have historically used derivative financial instruments
to hedge both the fair value of recognized assets or liabilities (a "fair
value" hedge) and the variability of anticipated cash flows of a forecasted
transaction (a "cash flow" hedge). Our strategies related to
derivative financial instruments have been:
- the use of foreign currency forward contracts to hedge a portion of
anticipated future short-term inventory purchases to offset the effects of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates (primarily between the U.S.
Dollar and the Canadian Dollar) and
- the use of interest rate swaps to effectively convert a portion of our
outstanding fixed-rate debt to variable-rate debt to take advantage of lower
interest rates.
- 53 -
The derivatives we use in our risk
management strategies are highly effective hedges because all the critical terms
of the derivative instruments match those of the hedged item. On the date the
derivative contract is entered into, we designate the derivative as either a
fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. Changes in derivative fair values that
are designated as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings as offsets to the
changes in fair value of the related hedged assets and liabilities. Changes in
derivative fair values that are designated as cash flow hedges are deferred and
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until the
associated hedged transactions impact the income statement, at which time the
deferred gains and losses are reclassified to either cost of sales for inventory
purchases or to SG&A expenses for all other items. Any ineffective portion
of a hedging derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized
in cost of sales. Differentials to be paid or received under interest rate swap
contracts are recognized in income over the life of the contracts as adjustments
to interest expense. Gains or losses generated from the early termination of
interest rate swap contracts and treasury locks are amortized to earnings over
the remaining terms of the contracts as adjustments to interest expense. The
fair values of the derivatives, which are based on quoted market prices, are
reported as other current assets or accrued expenses and other current
liabilities, as appropriate.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are reported
at amounts we expect to be collected, net of trade discounts and deductions for
co-op advertising normally taken by our customers, allowances we provide to our
retail customers to effectively flow goods through the retail channels, an
allowance for non-collection due to the financial position of our customers and
credit card accounts, and an allowance for estimated sales returns.
Inventories and Cost of Sales
Inventories are valued at the
lower of cost or market. Inventory values are determined using the FIFO (first
in, first out) and weighted average cost methods. We reduce the carrying cost of
inventories for obsolete or slow moving items as necessary to properly reflect
inventory value. The cost elements included in inventory consist of all direct
costs of merchandise (net of purchase discounts and vendor allowances),
allocated overhead (primarily design and indirect production costs), inbound
freight and merchandise acquisition costs such as commissions and import fees.
Cost of sales includes the
inventory cost elements listed above as well as warehouse outbound freight,
internally transferred merchandise freight and realized gains or losses on
foreign currency forward contracts associated with inventory purchases. Our cost
of sales may not be comparable to those of other entities, since some entities
include all of the costs associated with their distribution functions in cost of
sales while we include these costs in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Property, Plant, Equipment and Depreciation and Amortization
Property, plant and equipment are
recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed by the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold
improvements recorded at the inception of a lease are amortized using the
straight-line method over the life of the lease or the useful life of the
improvement, whichever is shorter; for improvements made during the lease term,
the amortization period is the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease
term (including any renewal periods that are deemed to be reasonably assured).
Property under capital leases is amortized over the lives of the respective
leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter.
Operating Leases
Total rent payments under
operating leases that include scheduled payment increases and rent holidays are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Rent expense on
our buildings and retail stores is classified as an SG&A expense and, for
certain stores, includes contingent rents that are based on a percentage of
retail sales over stated levels. Landlord allowances are amortized by the
straight-line method over the term of the lease as a reduction of rent expense.
- 54 -
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of
purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business
combinations accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. We test at
least annually our goodwill and other intangibles without determinable lives
(primarily tradenames and trademarks) for impairment through the use of
discounted cash flow models. Other intangibles with determinable lives,
including license agreements, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets (currently ranging from three to 19 years).
Foreign Currency Translation
The financial statements of
foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with SFAS
No. 52, "Foreign Currency Translation." Where the functional currency
of a foreign subsidiary is its local currency, balance sheet accounts are
translated at the current exchange rate and income statement items are
translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Gains and losses
resulting from translation are accumulated in a separate component of
stockholders' equity. Where the local currency of a foreign subsidiary is not
its functional currency, financial statements are translated at either current
or historical exchange rates, as appropriate. These adjustments, along with
gains and losses on transactions denominated and settled in a foreign currency,
are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. Net foreign currency
losses reflected in results from continuing operations were $0.2 million, $0.1
million and $0.5 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Defined Benefit Plans
Our funding policy is to
contribute more that the minimum required by applicable regulations to reduce
Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation fees and to increase the funding ratio for
Pension Protection Act requirements which begin to phase in during 2008.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock is recorded at
acquisition cost. Gains and losses on disposition are recorded as increases or
decreases to additional paid-in capital with losses in excess of previously
recorded gains charged directly to retained earnings.
Revenue Recognition
Wholesale apparel and footwear
and accessories sales are recognized either when products are shipped or, in
certain situations, upon acceptance by the customer. Retail sales are recorded
at the time of register receipt. Allowances for estimated returns are provided
when sales are recorded primarily by reducing revenues for the total revenues
related to estimated returns, with an offsetting reduction to cost of sales for
the cost of the estimated returns. Sales taxes collected from retail customers
are excluded from reported revenues. Licensing income is recognized based on the
higher of contractual minimums or sales of licensed products reported by our
licensees.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs
billed to customers are recorded as revenue. Freight costs associated with
shipping goods to customers are recorded as a cost of sales.
Advertising Expense
We record national advertising
campaign costs as an expense when the advertising takes place and we expense
advertising production costs as incurred, net of reimbursements for cooperative
advertising. Advertising costs associated with our cooperative advertising
programs are accrued as the related revenues are recognized. Net advertising
expense reflected in results from continuing operations was $54.2 million, $71.0
million and $70.0 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, net of
co-operative advertising reimbursements of $12.8 million, $13.1 million and
$14.6 million, respectively.
Income Taxes
We use the asset and liability
method of accounting for income taxes. Current tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the estimated Federal, foreign, state and local income taxes
payable or refundable on the tax returns for the current year. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences
of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets
and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax provisions are based on
the changes to the respective assets and liabilities from period to period.
- 55 -
Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when
uncertainty regarding their realizability exists.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share includes
no dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive
effect, the effect of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and
the conversion of any convertible bonds. The difference between reported basic
and diluted weighted-average common shares results from the assumption that all
dilutive stock options outstanding were exercised and all convertible bonds have
been converted into common stock.
The following options to purchase
shares of common stock were outstanding during a portion of 2007 and 2005 but
were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the
common shares and, therefore, would be antidilutive. For 2006, none of the
options outstanding were included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share due to the net loss for the year.
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
Number of options (in millions) |
8.3 |
- |
9.6 |
Weighted average exercise price |
$32.65 |
- |
$33.57 |
Stock Options
In December 2004, the FASB issued
a revision of SFAS No. 123, "Share-Based Payment" (hereinafter
referred to as "SFAS No. 123R"), which requires that the cost
resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the
financial statements. This Statement establishes fair value as the measurement
objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all
entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for
share-based payment transactions with employees except for equity instruments
held by employee share ownership plans. We adopted SFAS No. 123R on January 1,
2006 using the modified prospective application option. As a result, the
compensation cost for the portion of awards we granted before January 1, 2006
for which the requisite service had not been rendered and that were outstanding
as of January 1, 2006 will be recognized as the remaining requisite service is
rendered. In addition, the adoption of SFAS No. 123R required us to change from
recognizing the effect of forfeitures as they occur to estimating the number of
outstanding instruments for which the requisite service is not expected to be
rendered. As a result, we recorded a pretax gain of $3.1 million on January 1,
2006, which is reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle. We were also required to change the amortization period for employees
eligible to retire from the period over which the awards vest to the period from
the grant date to the date the employee is eligible to retire. This change
resulted in additional amortization expense of $1.9 million and $0.1 million for
2007 and 2006, respectively. Concurrently with the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we
have shifted the composition of our share-based compensation awards towards the
use of restricted shares and away from the use of employee stock options.
Had we elected to adopt the fair
value approach of SFAS No. 123 upon its effective date, our net income for 2005
would have decreased accordingly. Both the stock-based employee compensation
cost included in the determination of net income as reported and the stock-based
employee compensation cost that would have been included in the determination of
net income if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards, as
well as the resulting pro forma net income and earnings per share using the fair
value approach, are presented in the following table. These pro forma amounts
may not be representative of future disclosures since the estimated fair value
of stock options is amortized to expense over the vesting period, and additional
options may be granted in future years. For further information, see "Stock
Options and Restricted Stock."
- 56 -
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2005
|
(In millions except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income - as reported |
|
$
274.3 |
Add: stock-based employee compensation cost,
net of related tax effects, included in the determination of net income as reported |
|
11.9 |
Deduct: stock-based employee compensation cost,
net of related tax effects, that would have been included in the determination of net income
if the fair value-based method had been applied to all awards |
|
(13.1)
|
|
|
|
Net income - pro forma |
|
$ 273.1
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
As reported |
|
$ 2.33 |
Pro forma |
|
$ 2.32 |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
As reported |
|
$ 2.30 |
Pro forma |
|
$ 2.29 |
Restricted Stock
Compensation cost for restricted
stock is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our stock
at the date the common stock is issued over the amount the employee must pay to
acquire the stock. The compensation cost, net of projected forfeitures, is
recognized over the period between the issue date and the date any restrictions
lapse.
Long-Lived Assets
We review certain long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In that regard, we assess the
recoverability of such assets based upon estimated non-discounted cash flow
forecasts. If an asset impairment is identified, the asset is written down to
fair value based on discounted cash flow or other fair value measures.
Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid
short-term investments to be cash equivalents.
Presentation of Prior Year Data
Certain reclassifications have
been made to conform prior year data with the current presentation.
New Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the FASB issued
FASB Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48"), "Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,"
which establishes that the financial statement effects of a tax position taken
or expected to be taken in a tax return are to be recognized in the financial
statements when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that
the position will be sustained upon examination. FIN 48 also provides guidance
on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition.
We adopted FIN 48 on January 1,
2007. On that date, we had no uncertain tax positions. We recognize interest and
penalties, if any, as part of our provision for income taxes in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations. We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return
as well as unitary and combined income tax returns in several state
jurisdictions, of which California is the most significant. Our subsidiaries
also file separate company income tax returns in multiple states, of which New
York is the most significant.
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," which establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 is not expected to have a material
impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
- 57 -
In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115," which
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair
value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements
designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159
does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets
and liabilities to be carried at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the
beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15,
2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 is not expected to have a material impact on
our results of operations or our financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations"
("SFAS No. 141(R)"), which requires an acquirer to recognize the
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest of an
acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date,
with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier
application is prohibited. At the date of adoption, SFAS No. 141(R) is not
expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial
position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No.160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements," which requires (1) ownership interests in subsidiaries held by
parties other than the parent to be clearly identified, labeled, and presented
in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate
from the parent's equity; (2) the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly
identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income;
and (3) changes in a parent's ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently
as equity transactions. SFAS No. 160 applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier
application is prohibited. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have
a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
Accounts receivable consist of the
following:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts
receivable |
$ 365.5
|
$ 388.4
|
Allowances for doubtful
accounts, returns, discounts and co-op advertising |
(28.5)
|
(30.6)
|
|
|
|
|
$ 337.0
|
$ 357.8
|
|
|
|
A significant portion of our sales
are to retailers throughout the United States and Canada. We have one
significant customer in our wholesale better apparel, wholesale moderate apparel
and wholesale footwear and accessories operating segments. Macy's, Inc.
accounted for approximately 20%, 21% and 21% of consolidated gross revenues for
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and accounted for approximately 21% and 23%
of accounts receivable at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On September 6, 2007, we completed
the sale of Barneys to an affiliate of Istithmar PJSC. We received $937.4
million of cash (net of working capital adjustments) and paid an aggregate of
$54.5 million in cash as of December 31, 2007 for bonuses for key Barneys
employees, compensation for restricted stock held by certain employees of
Barneys that was forfeited upon the completion of the sale and other fees and
costs related to the sale. Net cash proceeds, after estimated taxes expected to
be paid, are expected to amount to approximately $840.0 million.
- 58 -
In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 144, the results of operations of Barneys for the current and prior
periods have been reported as discontinued operations and the assets and
liabilities relating to Barneys have been reclassified as held for sale in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Operating results of Barneys, which were formerly
included in our retail segment, are summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
Total revenues |
$ 452.1
|
$ 655.8
|
$ 542.0
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations of Barneys before provision for income taxes |
$ 22.0
|
$ 45.6
|
$ 38.5
|
Provision for income
taxes |
11.0
|
16.6
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
of Barneys |
11.0
|
29.0
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Barneys
before provision for income taxes (1) |
389.1
|
-
|
-
|
Provision for income
taxes |
134.9
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Barneys |
254.2
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
$ 265.2
|
$ 29.0
|
$ 21.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Net of $247.4 million of goodwill allocated to Barneys.
We have allocated $4.6 million,
$7.8 million and $5.2 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, of interest
expense to discontinued operations based on the weighted-average monthly
borrowing rate under our senior credit facilities applied to the average net
monthly balance of funds that had been advanced to Barneys.
NET ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
The assets and liabilities
relating to Barneys have been reclassified as held for sale in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Assets held for sale unrelated to the sale of Barneys include
property, plant and equipment at our Bristol, Pennsylvania distribution facility
and our Mexican production facilities, all of which have been closed.
The assets and liabilities
relating to these businesses consist of:
(In millions)
|
Barneys
|
Other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
Inventories |
$ 105.5
|
$ -
|
$ 105.5
|
Other current assets |
93.8
|
-
|
93.8
|
Property, plant and
equipment |
105.4
|
5.2
|
110.6
|
Goodwill |
247.4
|
-
|
247.4
|
Other intangibles |
63.3
|
-
|
63.3
|
Other assets |
0.2
|
-
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale |
$ 615.6
|
$ 5.2
|
$ 620.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
$ 85.4
|
$ -
|
$ 85.4
|
Long-term debt |
3.5
|
-
|
3.5
|
Long-term portion of
deferred taxes |
34.7
|
-
|
34.7
|
Other long-term liabilities |
57.1
|
-
|
57.1
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for
sale |
$ 180.7
|
$ -
|
$ 180.7
|
|
|
|
|
- 59 -
ACCRUED RESTRUCTURING COSTS
In late 2003, we began to evaluate
the need to broaden global sourcing capabilities to respond to the competitive
pricing and global sourcing capabilities of our denim competitors, as the
favorable production costs from non-duty/non-quota countries and the breadth of
fabric options from Asia began to outweigh the benefits of Mexico's quick turn
and superior laundry capabilities. On July 11, 2005, we announced that we had
completed a comprehensive review of our denim manufacturing operations located
in Mexico. The primary action plan arising from this review resulted in the
closing of the laundry, assembly and distribution operations located in San
Luis, Mexico (the "denim restructuring"). All manufacturing was
consolidated into existing operations in Durango and Torreon, Mexico. A total of
3,170 employees were terminated as a result of the closure.
In connection with the denim
restructuring, we recorded $11.4 million of net pre-tax costs (of which $12.1
million was recorded in 2005 and $0.7 million was reversed in 2006), which
includes $5.1 million of one-time termination benefits, $3.1 million of losses
on the sale of property, plant and equipment, $2.3 million of contract
termination costs and $0.9 million of legal and other associated costs. Of these
amounts, $10.1 million were reported as cost of sales and $1.3 million were
reported as a selling, general and administrative expense in the wholesale
moderate apparel segment. The restructuring was substantially completed during
the fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2006.
In December 2005, we closed our
distribution center in Bristol, Pennsylvania. A total of 118 employees were
affected by the closure. We recorded charges of $3.6 million and $0.4 million in
2005 and 2006, respectively, related to one-time termination benefits and other
employee-related matters. These expenses are reported as selling, general and
administrative expenses in the wholesale better apparel segment.
On May 15, 2006, we announced the
closing of our Secaucus, New Jersey warehouse to reduce excess capacity. In
connection with the closing, in 2006 we incurred $2.7 million of one-time
termination benefits and associated employee costs for 211 employees and $1.6
million for cleanup costs and remaining rent payments. These expenses are
reported as selling, general and administrative expenses in the wholesale better
apparel segment. The restructuring was substantially completed in September
2006.
On May 30, 2006, we announced the
closing of our Stein Mart leased shoe departments, effective January 2007. In
connection with the closing, we accrued $1.2 million and reversed $0.1 million
of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs in 2006 and 2007,
respectively, for 468 employees, which is reported as a selling, general and
administrative expense in the retail segment.
On September 12, 2006, we
announced the closing of certain El Paso, Texas and Mexican operations related
to the decision by Polo to discontinue the Polo Jeans Company product
line (the "manufacturing restructuring") , which we produced for Polo
subsequent to the sale of the Polo Jeans Company business to Polo in
February 2006. In connection with the El Paso closing, we incurred $4.3 million
of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for 134 employees
and $0.7 million of other costs. Of this amount, $2.3 million was reported as a
selling, general and administrative expense and $1.8 million was reported as a
cost of sales in the wholesale moderate apparel segment during 2006, and $0.3
million was reported as a selling, general and administrative expense and $0.6
million was reported as a cost of sales in the wholesale moderate apparel
segment during 2007. In connection with the Mexican closing, we expect to incur
$3.0 million of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for
1,729 employees and $0.7 million of other costs. Of this amount, $2.8 million
was reported as cost of sales in the wholesale moderate apparel segment in 2006,
and $0.4 million was reported as cost of sales and $0.3 million was reported as
a selling, general and administrative expense in the wholesale moderate apparel
segment in 2007. The remaining $0.2 million will be recorded as cost of sales in
the wholesale moderate apparel segment during 2008. In addition, we determined
the estimated fair value of the property, plant and equipment employed in Mexico
was less than its carrying value. As a result, we recorded an impairment loss of
$8.6 million, which is also reported as cost of sales in the wholesale moderate
apparel segment in 2006. The closings were substantially completed by the end of
March 2007.
In connection with the exit and
reorganization of certain moderate apparel product lines, we decided to close
certain New York offices, and on October 9, 2007, we announced the closing of
warehouse facilities in
- 60 -
Goose Creek, South Carolina. We expect to incur $8.0 million of one-time
termination benefits and associated employee costs for approximately 440
employees. Of this amount, $7.5 million and $0.4 million are reported as a
selling, general and administrative expense in the wholesale moderate apparel
and wholesale better apparel segments, respectively, in 2007, and the remaining
$0.1 million will be accrued on a straight-line basis over the remaining period
each employee is required to render service to receive the benefit. These
closings were substantially complete by the end of February 2008.
On October 17, 2007, we announced
the closing of warehouse facilities in Edison, New Jersey. We expect to incur
$3.5 million of one-time termination benefits and associated employee costs for
approximately 160 employees. Of this amount, $2.8 million is reported as a
selling, general and administrative expense in the wholesale moderate apparel
segment in 2007, and the remaining $0.7 will be accrued on a straight-line basis
over the remaining period each employee is required to render service to receive
the benefit. The closing will be substantially complete by the end of June 2008.
The accrual of restructuring costs
and liabilities, of which $9.9 million is included in current liabilities and
$1.1 million is included in other noncurrent liabilities, is as follows:
(In millions)
|
Severance
and other
employee
costs
|
Closing of
retail
stores and consolidation
of facilities
|
Denim
restructuring
|
Manufacturing restructuring
|
Total
|
Balance, January 1, 2005 |
$ 6.5
|
$ 18.1
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ 24.6
|
Net additions (reversals) |
2.9
|
(6.5)
|
9.0
|
-
|
5.4
|
Payments and reductions |
(6.0)
|
(9.5)
|
(6.5)
|
-
|
(22.0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2005 |
3.4
|
2.1
|
2.5
|
-
|
8.0
|
Net additions (reversals) |
4.3
|
1.6
|
(0.7)
|
6.9
|
12.1
|
Payments and reductions |
(6.3)
|
(2.1)
|
(1.8)
|
(3.5)
|
(13.7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
1.4
|
1.6
|
-
|
3.4
|
6.4
|
Net additions |
10.8
|
-
|
-
|
1.6
|
12.4
|
Payments and reductions |
(3.5)
|
(0.5)
|
-
|
(3.8)
|
(7.8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
$ 8.7
|
$ 1.1
|
$ -
|
$ 1.2
|
$ 11.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated severance payments and
other employee costs of $8.7 million accrued at December 31, 2007 relate to the
remaining estimated severance for 536 employees at locations to be closed.
Employee groups affected (totaling 1,450 employees) include administrative,
warehouse and management personnel at locations closed or to be closed.
The $10.8 million net addition in
2007 represents $7.9 million related to the exit and reorganization of certain
moderate apparel product lines, of which $7.5 million and $0.4 million are
reported as a selling, general and administrative expense in the wholesale
moderate apparel and wholesale better apparel segments, respectively, $2.8
million related to the closure of the Edison distribution center, which was
reported as a selling, general and administrative expense in the wholesale
moderate apparel segment, and a net $0.1 million recorded as a selling, general
and administrative expense in the retail segment related to the closing of our Anne
Klein Accessories and Stein Mart retail locations.
The $4.3 million net addition in
2006 represents $2.7 million related to the closing of the Secaucus distribution
center and $0.4 million of additional severance accruals related to the closing
of the Bristol distribution center, which were recorded as selling, general and
administrative expenses in the wholesale better apparel segment, and $1.2
million in severance accruals for the Stein Mart locations to be closed, which
was recorded as a selling, general and administrative expense in the retail
segment.
The $2.9 million net addition in
2005 represents $3.6 million related to the closing of the Bristol facility,
which was recorded as a selling, general and administrative expense in the
wholesale better apparel segment, offset by $0.6 million of adjustments related
to severance accruals for the Kasper and Maxwell acquisitions, which were
recorded as reductions of goodwill and $0.1 million related to the closing of
the Mexican and El Paso production facilities, which was recorded as a reduction
of selling, general and administrative expenses in the moderate wholesale
apparel segment.
- 61 -
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, $3.5
million, $6.3 million and $6.0 million, respectively, of the accrual were
utilized (relating to partial or full severance and related costs for 586, 729
and 165 employees, respectively).
The $1.1 million accrued at
December 31, 2007 for the consolidation of facilities relates to expected costs
to be incurred, including lease obligations, for closing certain acquired
facilities in connection with consolidating their operations into our other
existing facilities.
The $1.6 million addition in 2006
represents costs related to the closing of the Secaucus distribution center,
primarily to return the building to its original condition, which was recorded
as a selling, general and administrative expense in the wholesale better apparel
segment.
The $6.5 million reversal in 2005
includes a $1.2 million adjustment related to the closing of a Maxwell facility
and a $5.0 million adjustment related to the closing of a Kasper facility, both
of which were recorded as reductions of goodwill, and a $0.3 million reduction
related to the final settlement of the remaining lease for a previously-closed
North Carolina distribution facility, which was recorded as a reduction of
selling, general and administrative expenses in the wholesale better apparel
segment.
The details of the denim
restructuring accruals are as follows:
(In millions)
|
One-time
termination
benefits
|
Contract
termination
costs
|
Other
associated
costs
|
Total
denim
restructuring
|
Balance, January 1, 2005 |
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
Additions |
5.3
|
2.6
|
1.1
|
9.0
|
Payments and reductions |
(4.9)
|
(1.0)
|
(0.6)
|
(6.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
0.4
|
1.6
|
0.5
|
2.5
|
Reversals |
(0.2)
|
(0.3)
|
(0.2)
|
(0.7)
|
Payments and reductions |
(0.2)
|
(1.3)
|
(0.3)
|
(1.8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006 and 2005,
respectively, $0.2 million and $4.9 million of the termination benefits accrual
were utilized (relating to costs for 18 and 3,098 employees, respectively).
The details of the manufacturing
restructuring accruals are as follows:
(In millions)
|
|
One-time
termination
benefits
|
Other
associated
costs
|
Total
denim
restructuring
|
Balance, January 1, 2006 |
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
Additions |
|
6.1
|
0.8
|
6.9
|
Payments and reductions |
|
(3.3)
|
(0.2)
|
(3.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
|
2.8
|
0.6
|
3.4
|
Additions |
|
1.1
|
0.5
|
1.6
|
Payments and reductions |
|
(3.6)
|
(0.2)
|
(3.8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
|
$ 0.3
|
$ 0.9
|
$ 1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $1.2 million accrued at
December 31, 2007 represents $0.3 million of one-time termination benefits for
three remaining employees and $0.9 million of legal fees and related costs.
During 2007 and 2006, $3.6 million and $3.3 million of the termination benefits
reserve were utilized (relating to partial or full severance for 123 and 1,703
employees, respectively).
Our plans have not been finalized
in all areas, and additional restructuring costs may result as we continue to
evaluate and assess the impact of duplicate responsibilities, warehouses and
office locations. We do not expect any final adjustments to be material. Any
additional costs will be charged to operations in the period in which they
occur.
- 62 -
SALE OF POLO JEANS COMPANY BUSINESS
In October 1995, we acquired
an exclusive license to manufacture and market women's shirts, blouses,
skirts, jackets, suits, sweaters, pants, vests, coats, outerwear and hats under
the Lauren by Ralph Lauren trademark in the United States, Canada and Mexico
pursuant to license and design service agreements with Polo, which were to
expire on December 31, 2006. In May 1998, we acquired an exclusive license to
manufacture and market women's dresses, shirts, blouses, skirts, jackets,
suits, sweaters, pants, vests, coats, outerwear and hats under the Ralph by
Ralph Lauren trademark in the United States, Canada and Mexico pursuant to
license and design service agreements with Polo. The Ralph License was scheduled
to end on December 31, 2003.
During the course of the
discussions concerning the Ralph License, Polo asserted that the expiration of
the Ralph License would cause the Lauren License agreements to end on December
31, 2003, instead of December 31, 2006. We believed that this was an improper
interpretation and that the expiration of the Ralph License did not cause the
Lauren License to end.
On June 3, 2003, we announced that
our discussions with Polo regarding the interpretation of the Lauren License had
reached an impasse and that, as a result, we had filed a complaint in the New
York State Supreme Court against Polo and its affiliates and our former
President, Jackwyn Nemerov. The complaint alleged that Polo breached the Lauren
License agreements by claiming that the license ends at the end of 2003. The
complaint also alleged that Ms. Nemerov breached the confidentiality and
non-compete provisions of her employment agreement with us. Additionally, Polo
was alleged to have induced Ms. Nemerov to breach her employment agreement and
Ms. Nemerov was alleged to have induced Polo to breach the Lauren License
agreements. We asked the court to enter a judgment for compensatory damages of
$550 million, as well as punitive damages, and to enforce the confidentiality
and non-compete provisions of Ms. Nemerov's employment agreement.
These matters were resolved by
settlement dated January 22, 2006, which closed on February 3, 2006. In
connection with this settlement, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with
Polo and certain of its subsidiaries with respect to the sale to Polo of all
outstanding stock of Sun. We received gross proceeds of $355.0 million in
connection with the sale and the settlement. Sun's assets and liabilities on
the closing date primarily related to the Polo Jeans Company business,
which Sun operated under long-term license and design agreements entered into
with Polo in 1995. We retained distribution and product development facilities
in El Paso, Texas, along with certain working capital items, including accounts
receivable and accounts payable. In addition, as part of the agreements, we
provided certain support services to Polo (including manufacturing, distribution
and information technology) until January 2007 and we provided certain financial
and administrative functions until March 2007. Service revenue related to these
agreements recognized in the statement of operations is based on negotiated
monthly amounts according to the terms of the agreements.
We recorded a pre-tax loss of
approximately $145.1 million after allocating $356.7 million of goodwill to the
business sold and a pre-tax gain of $100.0 million related to the litigation
settlement. Approximately $3.7 million in state and local taxes have been
accrued related to the litigation settlement, resulting in a combined after tax
loss of approximately $48.8 million. The combined loss created federal and state
capital loss carryforwards that we are using to partially offset the gain
realized from the sale of Barneys.
Long-lived assets included in the
sale include $2.0 million of net property, plant and equipment and $5.5 million
of unamortized long-term prepaid marketing expenses. Net sales for the Polo
Jeans Company business, which are reported under the wholesale better
apparel segment, were $24.6 million and $303.5 million for 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
- 63 -
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Major classes of property, plant and equipment are as
follows:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
Useful
lives
(years)
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and
buildings |
$ 70.3
|
$ 81.2
|
15 - 40 |
Leasehold
improvements |
250.2
|
233.4
|
1 - 15 |
Machinery, equipment and software |
338.8
|
300.5
|
3 - 20 |
Furniture and
fixtures |
67.0
|
68.9
|
5 - 8 |
Construction in progress |
25.5
|
22.7
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
751.8
|
706.7
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
439.7
|
427.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 312.1
|
$ 279.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense relating to property, plant and equipment (including capitalized leases)
reflected in results from continuing operations was $74.4 million, $71.0 million
and $69.0 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At December 31, 2007, we
had outstanding commitments of approximately $28.8 million relating primarily to
the construction or remodeling of retail store locations and the design and
implementation of new computer software systems. We capitalized approximately
$0.5 million of interest in each of 2007 and 2006 as part of the cost of major
capital projects.
Included in property, plant and
equipment are the following capitalized leases:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
Useful
lives
(years)
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
$ 34.1
|
$ 45.9
|
15 - 20 |
Machinery and equipment |
13.6
|
10.5
|
4 - 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
47.7
|
56.4
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization |
17.7
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 30.0
|
$ 34.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVENTORIES
Inventories are summarized as follows:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
$ 0.3
|
$ 10.4
|
Work in process |
1.5
|
10.1
|
Finished goods |
522.1
|
510.3
|
|
|
|
|
$ 523.9
|
$ 530.8
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired and accounted for under
the purchase method. Accounting rules require that we test at least annually for
possible goodwill impairment. We perform our test in the fourth fiscal quarter
of each year using a discounted cash flow analysis that requires that certain
assumptions and estimates be made regarding industry economic factors and future
profitability.
- 64 -
As a result of the 2006 impairment
analysis, we determined that the goodwill balance existing in our wholesale
moderate apparel segment was impaired as a result of decreases in projected
revenues and profitability with respect to our Norton McNaughton, l.e.i.
and certain other moderate apparel brands, as well as changes in business
strategy with respect to our Norton McNaughton brand. Accordingly, we
recorded an impairment charge of $441.2 million. As a result of the 2007
impairment analysis, we determined that the remaining goodwill balance existing
in our wholesale moderate apparel segment was impaired as a result of decreases
in projected revenues and profitability for certain brands. Accordingly, we
recorded an impairment charge of $78.0 million.
The changes in the carrying amount
of goodwill for 2006 and 2007, by segment and in total, are as follows
(excluding $247.4 million allocated to the sale of Barneys):
(In millions)
|
Wholesale
Better
Apparel
|
Wholesale
Moderate
Apparel
|
Wholesale
Footwear &
Accessories
|
Retail
|
Total
|
Balance, January 1,
2006 |
$ 396.8
|
$ 519.2
|
$ 813.3
|
$ 120.6
|
$ 1,849.9
|
Sale of Polo Jeans Company business |
(356.7)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(356.7)
|
Impairment |
-
|
(441.2)
|
-
|
-
|
(441.2)
|
Net adjustments to purchase price of prior acquisitions |
-
|
-
|
(0.1)
|
-
|
(0.1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
40.1
|
78.0
|
813.2
|
120.6
|
1,051.9
|
Impairment |
-
|
(78.0)
|
-
|
-
|
(78.0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
$ 40.1
|
$ -
|
$ 813.2
|
$ 120.6
|
$ 973.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also perform our annual
impairment test for trademarks during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year. As
a result of the 2007 impairment analysis, we recorded trademark impairment
charges of $7.5 million as a result of decreases in projected revenues for
certain brands. We also recorded trademark impairment charges of $80.5 million
in 2007 as a result of our decision to discontinue our Norton McNaughton
brand and significantly reduce the scale of our Erika brand. As a result
of the 2006 impairment analysis, we recorded trademark impairment charges of
$50.2 million as a result of decreases in projected revenues for our Norton
McNaughton brand, our Albert Nipon better apparel brand, our Westies
and Sam & Libby footwear brands and our Richelieu costume
jewelry brand. All trademark impairment charges are reported as selling, general
and administrative expenses in the licensing, other and eliminations segment.
The components of other intangible
assets are as follows:
December 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
(In millions)
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Amortized intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
License
agreements |
|
$ 60.5
|
$ 43.5
|
|
$ 60.5
|
$ 41.2
|
Acquired favorable
leases |
|
0.5
|
0.2
|
|
0.5
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
43.7
|
|
61.0
|
41.4
|
Indefinite-life trademarks |
|
600.7
|
-
|
|
688.7
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 661.7
|
$ 43.7
|
|
$ 749.7
|
$ 41.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense reflected in
results from continuing operations for intangible assets subject to amortization
was $2.3 million, $3.6 million and $5.7 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization
for each of the years in the five-year period ending December 31, 2012 is
estimated to be $2.3 million in 2008, $2.3 million in 2009, $2.0 million in
2010, $2.0 million in 2011 and $1.9 million in 2012.
The cash flow models we use to
estimate the fair values of our goodwill and trademarks involve several
assumptions. Changes in these assumptions could materially impact our fair value
estimates. Assumptions
- 65 -
critical to our fair value estimates are: (i) discount rates used to derive
the present value factors used in determining the fair value of the reporting
units and trademarks; (ii) royalty rates used in our trade mark valuations;
(iii) projected average revenue growth rates used in the reporting unit and
trademark models; and (iv) projected long-term growth rates used in the
derivation of terminal year values. These and other assumptions are impacted by
economic conditions and expectations of management and will change in the future
based on period-specific facts and circumstances. The following table shows the
range of assumptions we used to derive our fair value estimates as part of our
annual impairment testing for 2007 and 2006.
|
2007
|
2006
|
|
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Discount rates |
9.5% |
9.5% |
9.4% |
9.4% |
Royalty rates |
-- |
1.0% - 7.0% |
-- |
1.0% - 7.0% |
Revenue growth rates |
(16.3%) - 9.7% |
(100%) - 57.5% |
(29.4%) - 13.0% |
(100%) - 50.0% |
Long-term growth rates |
3.0% |
0% - 3.0% |
3.0% |
0% - 4.0% |
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As a result of our global
operating and financing activities, we are exposed to changes in interest rates
and foreign currency exchange rates which may adversely affect results of
operations and financial condition. In seeking to minimize the risks and/or
costs associated with such activities, we manage exposure to changes in interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates through our regular operating and
financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative
financial instruments. The instruments eligible for utilization include forward,
option and swap agreements. We do not use financial instruments for trading or
other speculative purposes.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the
fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable
approximated carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The estimated fair values of other financial instruments subject to fair value
disclosures, determined based on broker quotes or quoted market prices or rates
for the same or similar instruments, and the related carrying amounts are as
follows:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion |
$ 749.4
|
$ 655.3
|
$ 749.3
|
$ 690.5
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts, net (liability)
asset |
(1.8)
|
(1.8)
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
Financial instruments expose us to
counterparty credit risk for nonperformance and to market risk for changes in
interest and currency rates. We manage exposure to counterparty credit risk
through specific minimum credit standards, diversification of counterparties and
procedures to monitor the amount of credit exposure. Our financial instrument
counterparties are substantial investment or commercial banks with significant
experience with such instruments. We also have procedures to monitor the impact
of market risk on the fair value and costs of our financial instruments
considering reasonably possible changes in interest and currency rates.
We are exposed to market risk
related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our products have
historically been purchased from foreign manufacturers in pre-set United States
dollar prices. To date, we generally have not been materially adversely affected
by fluctuations in exchange rates. We also have assets and liabilities
denominated in certain foreign currencies. At December 31, 2007, we had
outstanding foreign exchange contracts to exchange Canadian Dollars for a total
notional value of US $24.4 million at a weighted-average exchange rate of 1.0653
through December 2008.
- 66 -
We recorded amortization of net
gains resulting from the termination of interest rate swaps and locks of $2.3
million and $6.4 million 2006 and 2005, respectively, as a reduction of interest
expense in continuing operations. We reclassified $0.7 million, $0.5 million and
$0.4 million of net losses from foreign currency exchange contracts to cost of
sales in continuing operations in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. There has
been no material ineffectiveness related to our foreign currency exchange
contracts as the instruments are designed to be highly effective in offsetting
losses and gains transactions being hedged. An estimated $1.8 million of
existing pre-tax net losses from currency exchange contracts reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2007 will be
reclassified into cost of sales in the next 12 months.
CREDIT FACILITIES
At December 31, 2007, we had
credit agreements with several lending institutions to borrow an aggregate
principal amount of up to $1.75 billion under Senior Credit Facilities. These
facilities, of which the entire amount is available for letters of credit or
cash borrowings, provide for a $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility
that expires in June 2009 and a $750.0 million five-year revolving credit
facility that expires in June 2010. At December 31, 2007, $154.5 million was
outstanding under the credit facility that expires in June 2009 (comprised
solely of outstanding letters of credit) and no amounts were outstanding under
the credit facility that expires in June 2010. Borrowings under the Senior
Credit Facilities may also be used for working capital and other general
corporate purposes, including permitted acquisitions and stock repurchases. The
Senior Credit Facilities are unsecured and require us to satisfy both a coverage
ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent to
interest expense plus rents and a net worth maintenance covenant, as well as
other restrictions, including (subject to exceptions) limitations on our ability
to incur additional indebtedness, prepay subordinated indebtedness, make
acquisitions, enter into mergers and pay dividends. As of December 31, 2007, we
are in compliance with all such covenants.
At December 31, 2007, we also had
a C$10.0 million unsecured line of credit in Canada, under which C$0.2 million
of letters of credit were outstanding.
The weighted-average interest rate
for our credit facilities was 5.8% and 6.0% at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the
following:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.250% Senior Notes due
2009, net of unamortized discount of $0.1 and $0.1 |
$
249.9 |
$
249.9 |
5.125% Senior Notes due 2014, net of
unamortized discount of $0.1 and $0.2 |
249.9 |
249.8 |
6.125% Senior Notes due
2034, net of
unamortized discount of $0.4 and $0.4 |
249.6 |
249.6 |
|
|
|
|
$ 749.4
|
$ 749.3
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt maturities during
the next five years amount to $250.0 million in 2009. All of our notes contain
certain covenants, including, among others, restrictions on liens,
sale-leaseback transactions and additional secured debt, and pay interest
semiannually. The weighted-average interest rate of our long-term debt was 5.2%
at both December 31, 2007 and 2006.
- 67 -
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) is comprised of the
following:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
$
11.5 |
$
3.9 |
Minimum pension liability adjustments |
(8.4) |
(11.2) |
Unrealized (losses) gains on
hedge contracts |
(1.0) |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
$
2.1
|
$ (5.9)
|
|
|
|
DERIVATIVES
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," subsequently amended by
SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain
Hedging Activities" (as amended, hereinafter referred to as "SFAS
133"), establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments. Specifically, SFAS 133 requires us to recognize all derivatives as
either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and to measure those
instruments at fair value. Additionally, the fair value adjustments will affect
either stockholders' equity or net income, depending on whether the derivative
instrument qualifies as a hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the nature
of the hedging activity.
We use foreign currency forward
contracts for the specific purpose of hedging the exposure to variability in
forecasted cash flows associated primarily with inventory purchases. These
instruments are designated as cash flow hedges as the principal terms of the
forward exchange contracts are the same as the underlying forecasted foreign
currency cash flows. Therefore, changes in the fair value of the forward
contracts should be highly effective in offsetting changes in the expected
foreign currency cash flows, and accordingly, changes in the fair value of
forward exchange contracts are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of related tax effects, with the corresponding asset or liability
recorded in the balance sheet. Amounts recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income are reflected in current-period earnings when the hedged
transaction affects earnings.
The following summarizes the U.S.
Dollar equivalent amount of our Canadian foreign currency forward exchange
contracts.
December 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
(In millions)
|
|
Notional
Amount
|
Fair Value -
(Liability)
|
|
Notional
Amount
|
Fair Value -
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar - U.S. Dollar |
|
$ 24.4
|
$ (1.8)
|
|
$ 27.3
|
$ 1.2
|
During 2007, no material amounts
were reclassified from other comprehensive income to earnings and there was no
material ineffectiveness related to our cash flow hedges. If foreign currency
exchange rates do not change from their December 31, 2007 amounts, we estimate
that any reclassifications from other comprehensive income to earnings within
the next 12 months also will not be material. The actual amounts that will be
reclassified to earnings over the next 12 months could vary, however, as a
result of changes in market conditions.
- 68 -
OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASES
Obligations under capital leases consist of the following:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouses, office facilities and equipment |
$ 33.1
|
$ 39.9
|
Less: current portion |
4.8
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases - noncurrent |
$ 28.3
|
$ 35.8
|
|
|
|
We lease an office facility in
Bristol, Pennsylvania under a 15-year net lease that runs until August 2013 and
requires minimum annual rent payments of $1.0 million. The building has been
capitalized at $8.5 million, which approximates the present value of the minimum
lease payments. We also lease various equipment under two to six-year leases at
an aggregate annualized rental of $3.0 million. The equipment has been
capitalized at its fair market value of $11.0 million, which approximates the
present value of the minimum lease payments.
In 2003, we entered into a
sale-leaseback agreement for our Virginia warehouse facility. This transaction
resulted in a net gain of $7.5 million that has been deferred and is being
amortized over the lease term, which runs until April 2023 and requires minimum
annual rent payments of $2.4 million. The building has been capitalized at $25.6
million, which approximates the present value of the minimum lease payments.
The following is a schedule by
year of future minimum lease payments under capital leases, together with the
present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2007:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
2008 |
$ 7.0
|
2009 |
5.1
|
2010 |
4.4
|
2011 |
3.5
|
2012 |
3.5
|
Later years |
25.8
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
49.3
|
Less: amount representing interest |
16.2
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
$ 33.1
|
|
|
COMMON STOCK
The Board of Directors has
authorized several programs to repurchase our common stock from time to time in
open market transactions. We repurchased $496.9 million, $306.2 million and
$235.2 million of our common stock during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As
of December 31, 2007, $303.1 million of Board authorized repurchases was still
available. We may make additional share repurchases in the future depending on,
among other things, market conditions and our financial condition.
On September 6, 2007, we paid
$400.0 million for the purchase of our common stock under an accelerated stock
repurchase ("ASR") program entered into with Goldman, Sachs & Co.
("Goldman"). We received an initial delivery of 15.5 million shares on
September 11, 2007 and a second delivery of 2.4 million shares on October 18,
2007. The combined average price for the 17.9 million shares delivered to date
under the ASR is $22.31 per share. Remaining shares, if any, to be received
under the ASR program, up to a maximum of 3.1 million possible shares, will be
received upon final settlement of the program, which is scheduled for no later
than July 19, 2008, and may occur earlier at the option of Goldman or later
under certain circumstances. The exact number of additional shares, if any, to
be delivered to us under the ASR will be based on the volume weighted-average
price of our stock during the term of the ASR, subject to a minimum and maximum
- 69 -
price for the purchased shares. The initial shares repurchased are subject to
adjustment if we enter into or announce certain types of transactions. During
the term of the ASR program, we must obtain the consent of Goldman to make any
additional share repurchases.
Our Board of Directors has
authorized our common stock repurchases as a tax-effective means to enhance
shareholder value and distribute cash to shareholders and, to a lesser extent,
to offset the impact of dilution resulting from the issuance of employee stock
options and shares of restricted stock. We believe that we have sufficient
sources of funds to repurchase shares without significantly impacting our
short-term or long-term liquidity. In authorizing future share repurchase
programs, our Board of Directors gives careful consideration to both our
projected cash flows and our existing capital resources.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) CONTINGENT LIABILITIES. We
have been named as a defendant in various actions and proceedings, including
actions brought by certain employees whose employment has been terminated
arising from our ordinary business activities. Although the amount of any
liability that could arise with respect to these actions cannot be accurately
predicted, in our opinion, any such liability will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial position or results of operations.
(b) ROYALTIES. We have an
exclusive license to produce and sell women's footwear under the Dockers
Women trademark in the United States (including its territories and
possessions) pursuant to an agreement with Levi Strauss & Co. which expires
on December 31, 2008. The agreement provides for payment by us of a percentage
of net sales against guaranteed minimum royalty and advertising payments as set
forth in the agreement. Minimum payments under this agreement amount to $0.7
million for 2008.
We have an exclusive license to
produce, market and distribute costume jewelry in the United States, Canada,
Mexico and Japan under the Givenchy trademark pursuant to an agreement
with Givenchy, which expires on December 31, 2008. The agreement provides for
the payment by us of a percentage of net sales against guaranteed minimum
royalty and advertising payments as set forth in the agreement. Minimum payments
under this agreement amount to $0.6 million for 2008.
(c) LEASES. Total rent expense
charged to continuing operations for 2007, 2006 and 2005 was as follows.
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rent |
$ 130.9
|
$ 127.5
|
$ 123.2
|
Contingent rent |
0.5
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
Less: sublease rent |
(5.3)
|
(5.3)
|
(5.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 126.1
|
$ 123.1
|
$ 118.8
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required
under operating leases:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
2008 |
$ 122.8
|
2009 |
118.9
|
2010 |
111.0
|
2011 |
100.0
|
2012 |
80.4
|
Later years |
274.2
|
|
|
|
$ 807.3
|
|
|
Certain of the leases provide for
renewal options and the payment of real estate taxes and other occupancy costs.
Future rental commitments for leases have not been reduced by minimum
non-cancelable sublease rentals aggregating $25.7 million.
- 70 -
INCOME TAXES
The following summarizes the
(benefit) provision for income taxes for continuing operations:
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
Federal |
$ (123.5)
|
$ 49.1
|
$ 77.7
|
State and local |
5.2
|
16.9
|
11.9
|
Foreign |
5.2
|
6.5
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113.1)
|
72.5
|
98.4
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
11.3
|
(121.7)
|
33.9
|
State and local
|
(3.0)
|
(18.6)
|
1.3
|
Foreign
|
0.4
|
(1.2)
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
(141.5)
|
35.6
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
$ (104.4)
|
$ (69.0)
|
$ 134.0
|
|
|
|
|
The total income tax (benefit)
provision for continuing operations was recorded as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ (104.4)
|
$ (70.1)
|
$ 134.0
|
Included in cumulative effect of change in
accounting for share-based payments |
-
|
1.1
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (104.4)
|
$ (69.0)
|
$ 134.0
|
|
|
|
|
The domestic and foreign
components of (loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes from
continuing operations are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in (loss)
income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
United States |
$(73.0)
|
$(251.0)
|
$ 374.6
|
Foreign |
14.5
|
5.9
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58.5)
|
(245.1)
|
386.8
|
|
|
|
|
Included in cumulative effect of change in
accounting for share-based payments |
|
|
|
United States |
-
|
3.1
|
-
|
Foreign |
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
3.1
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before (benefit) provision
for income taxes |
|
|
|
United States |
(73.0)
|
(247.9)
|
374.6
|
Foreign |
14.5
|
5.9
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (58.5)
|
$ (242.0)
|
$ 386.8
|
|
|
|
|
The (benefit) provision for income
taxes from continuing operations on adjusted historical income differs from the
amounts computed by applying the applicable Federal statutory rates due to the
following:
- 71 -
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for Federal income taxes at the statutory rate |
$ (20.5)
|
$ (84.8)
|
$ 134.8
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit |
0.4
|
(5.6)
|
9.4
|
Foreign income tax
difference |
(4.2)
|
(3.7)
|
(5.8)
|
Goodwill impairment |
27.3
|
17.1
|
-
|
Capital loss on sale of
subsidiary |
-
|
(96.4)
|
-
|
Reversal of prior years federal, state and
foreign income tax
audit accruals |
-
|
(8.6)
|
(5.7)
|
Valuation allowances |
(107.2)
|
112.4
|
0.7
|
Other items, net |
(0.2)
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
$ (104.4)
|
$ (69.0)
|
$ 134.0
|
|
|
|
|
We have not provided for U.S.
Federal and foreign withholding taxes on $44.3 million of foreign subsidiaries'
undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2007. Such earnings are intended to be
reinvested indefinitely.
The following is a summary of the
significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities): |
|
|
Nondeductible accruals and allowances |
$ 65.0
|
$ 68.9
|
Depreciation |
20.9
|
22.3
|
Intangible asset valuation and amortization |
(70.4)
|
(75.3)
|
Loss and credit carryforwards |
16.0
|
117.0
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation |
14.7
|
15.7
|
Deferred compensation |
4.7
|
4.6
|
Inventory valuation |
(14.9)
|
(5.5)
|
Inventory overhead |
3.4
|
4.5
|
Pension |
3.0
|
6.8
|
Gain on sale-leaseback transaction |
2.9
|
3.3
|
Prepaid expenses |
(3.7)
|
(1.2)
|
Display costs |
(1.6)
|
(0.7)
|
Other (net) |
0.4
|
(2.1)
|
Valuation allowances |
(5.2)
|
(112.4)
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
$ 35.2
|
$ 45.9
|
|
|
|
Included in:
|
|
|
Current assets
|
$ 33.9
|
$ 53.7
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
1.3
|
-
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
-
|
(7.8)
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
$ 35.2
|
$ 45.9
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, we had
state net operating loss carryforwards of $218.9 million which expire through
2027 and state tax credit carryforwards of $8.0 million, which expire through
2021.
In 2006, we determined that $303.1
million of capital loss carryforwards, $12.8 million of state net operating loss
carryforwards and $6.2 million of state credit carryforwards may not be
utilized; therefore, we established valuation allowances of $107.7 million, $0.7
million (net of federal tax benefit) and $4.0 million (net of federal tax
benefit) related to the capital loss, state net operating loss and credit
carryforwards, respectively.
- 72 -
In 2007, the capital loss
valuation allowance of $107.7 million was reversed as capital gain income
generated from the sale of Barneys fully utilized the capital loss
carryforwards. The reversal has been recorded in income from continuing
operations as the creation of the valuation allowance was recorded in continuing
operations in 2006 upon the sale of our Polo Jeans Company business. The
state net operating loss valuation allowance of $0.7 million was also reversed
as the 2002 state net operating loss carryforward was unable to be utilized.
During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2007, we determined that $1.8 million of
state credit carryforwards expiring through 2021 may not be utilized; therefore,
we established a valuation allowance of $1.2 million (net of federal tax
benefit) related to the state credit carryforward.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN
48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109," which establishes that the financial statement effects
of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return are to be
recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not, based on
the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. FIN
48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
We adopted FIN 48 on January 1,
2007. On that date, we had no uncertain tax positions, as we anticipated filing
amended returns with various jurisdictions and settling all ongoing state and
local audits by December 31, 2007. We classify interest and penalties, if any,
as a part of our provision for income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Income taxes, interest and penalties related to the anticipated
amended returns and audit settlements at December 31, 2006 were included in
income taxes payable.
During the fourth fiscal quarter
of 2007, we determined that $16.7 million (net of federal tax benefit) included
in income taxes payable at December 31, 2006 should be reclassified as uncertain
tax position liabilities. The reclassification was due to changes in our amended
return filing positions and ongoing income tax audits during the fourth fiscal
quarter of 2007. Our total unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007 were
$16.7 million (net of federal tax benefit), including interest of $7.3 million
(net of federal tax benefit) and penalties of $0.5 million.
(In millions) |
|
Uncertain tax positions at December 31,
2006 |
$ - |
Increases during 2007 |
16.7 |
Decreases during 2007 |
- |
|
|
Uncertain tax positions at December 31,
2007 |
$ 16.7 |
|
|
We file a consolidated U.S.
federal income tax return as well as unitary and combined income tax returns in
several state jurisdictions, of which California is the most significant. Our
subsidiaries also file separate company income tax returns in multiple states
and local jurisdictions, of which New York and New York City are the most
significant.
The Internal Revenue Service has
completed examination of our federal returns for taxable years prior to 2005.
Our state income tax examinations, with limited exceptions, have been completed
for the periods prior to 2003. The Internal Revenue Service is currently
examining our 2005 federal income tax return. We are currently being examined by
the state of California for the taxable years 2001 through 2003, the state of
New York for the taxable years 2003 through 2005 and New York City for the
taxable years 1999 through 2005.
We reasonably expect to settle all
ongoing audits by December 31, 2008. We anticipate state and local amended
returns will be filed and settlement negotiations will begin prior to March 31,
2008. The nature of the uncertain tax positions to be settled by December 31,
2008 include the ability of a state or local taxing jurisdiction to force one or
more of our entities to file on a combined or unitary basis rather than on a
separate company basis, state apportioned taxable income presented on filed tax
returns and nexus in certain taxing jurisdictions.
- 73 -
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The computation of basic and
diluted (loss) earnings per share is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$
45.9
|
$
(175.0)
|
$
252.8
|
Income from discontinued operations |
265.2
|
29.0
|
21.5
|
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting for share-based payments |
-
|
1.9
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) |
$
311.1
|
$
(144.1)
|
$
274.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding - basic |
99.9
|
110.6
|
118.0
|
Effect of dilutive employee stock options and restricted stock
|
1.4
|
-
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares and share equivalents outstanding - diluted |
101.3
|
110.6
|
119.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share - basic |
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
$
0.46
|
$
(1.58)
|
$
2.15
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
2.65
|
0.26
|
0.18
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for share-based payments
|
-
|
0.02
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
$
3.11
|
$
(1.30)
|
$
2.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share - diluted |
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
$
0.45
|
$
(1.58)
|
$
2.12
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
2.62
|
0.26
|
0.18
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for share-based payments
|
-
|
0.02
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
$
3.07
|
$
(1.30)
|
$
2.30
|
|
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for continuing
operations: |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
$ 52.1 |
$ 53.4 |
$ 80.8 |
|
Income taxes |
67.7 |
106.2 |
89.2 |
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities
for continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
Property acquired through capital lease financing
|
4.1 |
3.9 |
0.5 |
|
Restricted stock issued to employees |
19.2 |
10.2 |
16.4 |
- 74 -
GAIN ON SALE OF STOCK IN RUBICON RETAIL LIMITED
On October 12, 2006, Mosaic
Fashions hf ("Mosaic") completed its acquisition of United Kingdom
retailer Rubicon Retail Limited ("Rubicon"). As a result of our sale
of Nine West's United Kingdom operations in January 2001, we obtained warrants
to purchase stock in Rubicon. These warrants were exercisable only upon a change
of control of Rubicon (including a public offering of Rubicon's shares) and,
therefore, had no ascertainable value prior to Mosaic's acquisition of
Rubicon. Upon this acquisition, we exercised these outstanding warrants and
Mosaic purchased the resulting shares. As a result, we recorded a gain of $17.4
million (net of associated costs) in 2006.
STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK
Under two stock option plans, we
may grant stock options and other awards from time to time to key employees,
officers, directors, advisors and independent consultants to us or to any of our
subsidiaries. In general, options become exercisable over either a three-year or
five-year period from the grant date and expire 10 years after the date of grant
for options granted on or before May 28, 2003 and seven years after the date of
grant thereafter. In certain cases for non-employee directors, options become
exercisable six months after the grant date. Shares available for future option
and restricted stock grants at December 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled 5.2 million
and 4.1 million, respectively. Our policy is to issue new shares upon the
exercise of options and to offset these new shares by repurchasing shares in the
open market. We currently have no plans to repurchase any shares in 2008.
Compensation cost recorded for
stock-based employee compensation awards (including awards to non-employee
directors) reflected in continuing operations was $14.0 million, $12.8 million
and $16.6 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total compensation cost
for continuing operations related to unvested awards not yet recognized at
December 31, 2007 was $10.6 million, which is expected to be amortized over a
weighted-average period of approximately 23.5 months. Cash received from option
exercises for 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $11.1 million, $32.4 million and $13.4
million, respectively. The total tax benefit recognized for the tax deductions
from option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock for 2007, 2006 and
2005 totaled $16.4 million, $20.5 million and $13.9 million, respectively.
The following tables summarize
information about stock option transactions and related information (options in
millions):
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Outstanding, January 1 |
9.4 |
$31.43 |
|
11.5 |
$30.91 |
|
11.5 |
$30.19 |
Granted |
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
1.0
|
$35.95
|
Exercised |
(0.6)
|
$19.61
|
|
(1.4)
|
$24.01
|
|
(0.6)
|
$22.88
|
Cancelled |
(1.0) |
$32.46 |
|
(0.5) |
$35.44 |
|
(0.4) |
$35.07 |
Expired |
(0.2) |
$23.60 |
|
(0.2) |
$39.75 |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31 |
7.6
|
$32.44
|
|
9.4
|
$31.43
|
|
11.5
|
$30.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31 |
7.2
|
$32.20
|
|
8.5
|
$30.96
|
|
9.6
|
$30.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 75 -
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
Weighted-average
contractual term (in years) of:
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
end of year
|
3.4 |
4.2 |
5.0 |
Options exercisable at end of year
|
3.3 |
4.1 |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value (in
millions) of:
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
end of year
|
$ 0.3 |
$ 32.1 |
$ 27.8 |
Options exercisable at end of year
|
0.3 |
31.8 |
27.6 |
Options exercised
during the year
|
6.8 |
10.4 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
Fair value (in millions) of options vested during the year
|
$ 3.0 |
$ 9.2 |
$ 22.0 |
The fair value of each option
award is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility
of our stock price and implied volatilities from publicly traded options on our
stock. We use historical data to estimate an option's expected life; the
expected life for grants to senior management-level employees and other
employees are considered separately for valuation purposes. The risk-free
interest rate input is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of the grant. Compensation cost, net of projected forfeitures, is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the period between the grant and
vesting dates, with compensation cost for grants with a graded vesting schedule
recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each
separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance,
multiple awards.
The following table summarizes the
weighted average fair value of options granted and the related weighted average
assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model for grants
issued in 2005. We did not grant any options in 2006 or 2007.
Year Ended December 31,
|
2005
|
Weighted-average fair value of options at grant date:
|
|
|
Exercise price less than market price
|
|
$8.00 |
Exercise price equal to market price
|
|
$10.43 |
|
|
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
Dividends yield
|
|
1.02% |
Expected volatility
|
|
30.3% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.46% |
Expected life (years)
|
|
3.9 |
Compensation cost for restricted
stock is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our stock
at the date the common stock is issued over the amount the employee must pay to
acquire the stock (which is generally zero). The compensation cost, net of
projected forfeitures, is recognized over the period between the issue date and
the date any restrictions lapse, with compensation cost for grants with a graded
vesting schedule recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in
substance, multiple awards. The restrictions do not affect voting and dividend
rights.
The following tables summarize
information about unvested restricted stock transactions (shares in thousands):
- 76 -
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Fair
Value
|
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Fair
Value
|
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Fair
Value
|
Nonvested, January 1 |
1,326 |
$33.61 |
|
1,092 |
$34.34 |
|
738 |
$32.67 |
Granted |
762
|
$32.36
|
|
635
|
$31.72
|
|
705
|
$35.35
|
Vested |
(346)
|
$34.46
|
|
(315)
|
$31.78
|
|
(297)
|
$31.92
|
Forfeited |
(985) |
$33.21 |
|
(86) |
$35.69 |
|
(54) |
$34.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, December 31 |
757
|
$32.48
|
|
1,326
|
$33.61
|
|
1,092
|
$34.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
Fair value (in millions)
of shares vested during the year
|
$
11.9 |
$
10.0 |
$
9.5 |
During 2007, 761,750 shares of
restricted common stock were issued to 208 employees and directors under the
1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The restrictions generally lapse on the third
anniversary of issue. The value of this stock based on quoted market values was
$24.6 million.
During 2006, 634,927 shares of
restricted common stock were issued to 131 employees and directors under the
1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The restrictions generally lapse on the third
anniversary of issue. The value of this stock based on quoted market values was
$20.1 million.
During 2005, 705,250 shares of
restricted common stock were issued to 200 employees and directors under the
1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The restrictions generally lapse on the third
anniversary of issue. The value of this stock based on quoted market values was
$24.9 million.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Contribution Plan
We maintain the Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. Retirement Plan (the "Jones Plan") under Section 401(k) of
the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"). Employees not covered by a
collective bargaining agreement and meeting certain other requirements are
eligible to participate in the Jones Plan. Under the Jones Plan, participants
may elect to have up to 50% of their salary (subject to limitations imposed by
the Code) deferred and deposited with a qualified trustee, who in turn invests
the money in a variety of investment vehicles as selected by each participant.
All employee contributions into the Jones Plan are 100% vested.
We have elected to make the Jones
Plan a "Safe Harbor Plan" under Section 401(k)(12) of the Code. As a
result of this election, we make a fully-vested safe harbor matching
contribution for all eligible participants amounting to 100% of the first 3% of
the participant's salary deferred and 50% of the next 2% of salary deferred,
subject to maximums set by the Department of the Treasury. We may, at our sole
discretion, contribute additional amounts to all employees on a pro rata basis.
We contributed approximately $6.9
million, $8.2 million and $8.0 million to our defined contribution plan from
continuing operations during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Defined Benefit Plans
We maintain several defined
benefit plans, including the Pension Plan for Associates of Nine West Group Inc.
(the "Cash Balance Plan") and The Napier Company Retirement Plan for
certain associates of Victoria (the "Napier Plan"). The Cash Balance
Plan expresses retirement benefits as an account balance which increases each
year through interest credits. All benefits under the Napier Plan are frozen at
the amounts
- 77 -
earned by the participants as of December 31, 1995. Our funding
policy is to contribute more than the minimum required by applicable regulations to reduce Pension Benefit
Guarantee Corporation fees and to increase the funding ratio for Pension
Protection Act requirements which begin to phase in during 2008. We plan to
contribute $2.2 million to our defined benefit plans in 2008. The measurement
date for all plans is December 31.
Obligations and Funded Status
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
benefit obligation |
|
|
Benefit
obligation, beginning of year |
$
43.3
|
$ 39.6
|
Interest
cost |
2.6
|
2.5
|
Actuarial (gain) loss |
(4.0)
|
4.2
|
Settlements |
0.6
|
1.0
|
Benefits paid |
(3.5)
|
(4.0)
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, end of year |
39.0
|
43.3
|
|
|
|
Change in
plan assets |
|
|
Fair value
of plan assets, beginning of year |
27.4
|
25.2
|
Actual return on plan assets |
1.3
|
1.9
|
Employer
contribution |
9.4
|
4.3
|
Benefits
paid |
(3.5)
|
(4.0)
|
|
|
|
Fair value
of plan assets, end of year |
34.6
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year |
$(4.4)
|
$(15.9)
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized on the Balance Sheet
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
assets |
$
0.9
|
$
-
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
5.3
|
15.9
|
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$
14.4
|
$
18.2
|
Information for Pension Plans with an Accumulated Benefit Obligation in
Excess of Plan Assets
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit
obligation |
$
39.0
|
$ 43.3
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
39.0
|
43.3
|
Fair value of plan
assets |
34.6
|
27.4
|
- 78 -
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in
Other Comprehensive Income or Loss
Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic
Benefit Cost: |
|
|
Interest cost |
$
2.6
|
$
2.5
|
Expected
return on plan assets |
(2.4)
|
(1.9)
|
Settlement costs |
1.3
|
1.8
|
Amortization
of net loss |
1.0
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost |
2.5
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
Other
Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations |
|
|
Recognized in
Other Comprehensive Income or Loss: |
|
|
Net (gain) loss |
(2.8)
|
2.0
|
Amortization of net gain |
(1.8)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6)
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
Total
recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income |
$
(2.1)
|
$
5.7
|
|
|
|
The estimated net
loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net
periodic benefit cost in 2008 is $0.8 million.
Assumptions
|
2007
|
2006
|
Weighted-average
assumptions used to determine: |
|
|
Benefit
obligations at December 31 |
|
|
Discount rate |
6.8%
|
6.1%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
7.9%
|
7.9%
|
Net periodic benefit cost for year ended December 31 |
|
|
Discount rate |
6.1%
|
5.6%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
7.9%
|
7.9%
|
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
Year Ending December 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
2008 |
$
2.0
|
2009 |
1.9
|
2010 |
1.8
|
2011 |
1.9
|
2012 |
2.2
|
2013 through 2017 |
12.1
|
|
|
|
$ 21.9
|
|
|
Plan Assets
The weighted-average asset allocations at December 31,
2007 and 2006 by asset category are as follows:
December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
Equity
securities |
62%
|
65%
|
Debt securities |
31%
|
27%
|
Other |
7%
|
8%
|
|
|
|
Total |
100%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
- 79 -
Our plans are designed to
diversify investments across types of investments and investment managers.
Permitted investment vehicles include investment-grade fixed income securities,
domestic and foreign equity securities, mutual funds, guaranteed insurance
contracts and real estate, while speculative and derivative investment vehicles
are generally prohibited. The investment managers have full discretion to manage
their portion of the investments subject to the objectives and policies of the
respective plans. The performance of the investment managers is reviewed on a
regular basis. The primary objectives are to achieve a rate of return sufficient
to meet current and future plan cash requirements and to emphasize long-term
growth of principal while avoiding excessive risk and maintaining fund
liquidity. At December 31, 2007, the weighted-average target allocation
percentages for fund investments were 45% fixed income securities, 37% U. S.
equity securities, 2% real estate and 16% international securities.
To determine the overall expected
long-term rate-of-return-on-assets assumption, we add an expected inflation rate
to the expected long-term real returns of our various asset classes, taking into
account expected volatility and correlation between the returns of the asset
classes as follows: for equities and real estate, a historical average
arithmetic real return; for government fixed-income securities, current yields
on inflation-indexed bonds; and for corporate fixed-income securities, the yield
on government fixed-income securities plus a blend of current and historical
credit spreads.
Other Plans
We also maintain the Nine West
Group Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, the Nine West Group Inc.
Postretirement Executive Life Plan and the Nine West Group, Inc. Postretirement
Medical Plan, none of which have a material effect on our results of operations
or on our financial position. These plans, which are unfunded, were underfunded
by $4.2 million at December 31, 2007. Of this amount, $0.6 million is reported
under accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $3.6 million is
reported under other noncurrent liabilities.
We also maintain the Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, a non-qualified defined contribution
plan for certain management and other highly compensated employees (the
"Rabbi Trust"). Under the plan, participants may elect have up to 90%
of their salary and annual bonus deferred and deposited with a qualified
trustee, who in turn invests the money in a variety of investment vehicles as
selected by each participant. The assets of the Rabbi Trust, consisting of
primarily debt and equity securities, are recorded at current market prices. The
trust assets are available to satisfy claims of our general creditors in the
event of bankruptcy. The trust's assets, included in prepaid expenses and
other current assets, and the corresponding deferred compensation liability,
included in accrued employee compensation and benefits, were $12.0 million and
$11.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. This plan has no
effect on our results of operations.
JOINT VENTURES
We had two joint ventures formed
with HCL Technologies Limited ("HCL") to provide us with computer
consulting, programming and associated support services. HCL is a global
technology and software services company offering a suite of services targeted
at technology vendors, software product companies and organizations. We had a
49% ownership interest in each joint venture, which operated under the names HCL
Jones Technologies, LLC and HCL Jones Technologies (Bermuda), Ltd. The agreement
under which the joint ventures were established terminated in January 2008, and
the parties have adopted plans of liquidation for both joint venture companies.
We also had a 50% ownership
interest in a joint venture with Sutton Development Pty. Ltd.
("Sutton") to operate retail locations in Australia, which operated
under the name Nine West Australia Pty Ltd. We sold our interest in this joint
venture to Sutton on December 3, 2007 for $20.7 million, which resulted in a
pre-tax gain of $8.2 million. The sales price is subject to certain working
capital adjustments, which could result in additional sales proceeds in 2008.
The results of our joint ventures
are reported under the equity method of accounting.
- 80 -
BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA INFORMATION
We identify operating segments
based on, among other things, differences in products sold and the way our
management organizes the components of our business for purposes of allocating
resources and assessing performance. Our operations are comprised of four
reportable segments: wholesale better apparel, wholesale moderate apparel,
wholesale footwear and accessories, and retail. Segment revenues are generated
from the sale of apparel, footwear and accessories through wholesale channels
and our own retail locations. The wholesale segments include wholesale
operations with third party department and other retail stores, the retail
segment includes operations by our own stores, and income and expenses related
to trademarks, licenses and general corporate functions are reported under
"licensing, other and eliminations." We define segment profit as
operating income before net interest expense, goodwill impairment charges,
equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates and income taxes. Summarized
below are our revenues, income and total assets by reportable segments.
(In millions)
|
Wholesale
Better
Apparel
|
Wholesale
Moderate
Apparel
|
Wholesale
Footwear &
Accessories
|
Retail
|
Licensing,
Other &
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
Revenues from external customers |
$ 1,101.0
|
$ 985.0
|
$ 955.8
|
$ 753.7
|
$ 53.0
|
$ 3,848.5
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
155.8
|
10.7
|
72.6
|
-
|
(239.1)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
1,256.8
|
995.7
|
1,028.4
|
753.7
|
(186.1)
|
3,848.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
(loss) |
$
126.0
|
$
(4.2)
|
$
109.2
|
$
(43.2)
|
$ (136.8)
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
(47.8)
|
|
Goodwill
impairment |
(78.0)
|
|
Gain
on sale of interest in Australian joint venture |
8.2
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
benefit for income taxes |
$ (58.5)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
$ 11.2 |
$ 10.4 |
$ 10.9 |
$ 23.0 |
$ 35.0 |
$ 90.5 |
For the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
Revenues from external customers |
$ 1,127.4
|
$ 1,142.0
|
$ 941.1
|
$ 822.7
|
$ 53.8
|
$ 4,087.0
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
145.4
|
3.8
|
53.9
|
-
|
(203.1)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
1,272.8
|
1,145.8
|
995.0
|
822.7
|
(149.3)
|
4,087.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
$
143.1
|
$
71.8
|
$
96.8
|
$
37.1
|
$ (82.5)
|
266.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
(47.0)
|
|
Loss on sale of
Polo Jeans Company business |
(45.1)
|
|
Gain
on sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
17.4
|
|
Goodwill
impairment |
(441.2)
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations before benefit for income taxes |
$
(245.1)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
$
17.0 |
$
11.2 |
$
12.7 |
$
18.5 |
$
27.0 |
$
86.4 |
For the year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
Revenues from external customers |
$ 1,438.2
|
$ 1,265.2
|
$ 978.6
|
$
791.3
|
$
58.9
|
$
4,532.2
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
144.5
|
4.6
|
41.5
|
-
|
(190.6)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
1,582.7
|
1,269.8
|
1,020.1
|
791.3
|
(131.7)
|
4,532.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
$
166.5
|
$
89.1
|
$
141.8
|
$ 77.8
|
$ (21.7)
|
453.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
expense |
(69.9)
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
$
386.8
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
$ 14.9 |
$ 16.4 |
$ 10.3 |
$
16.2 |
$
28.6 |
$
86.4 |
(In
millions) |
Wholesale
Better
Apparel
|
Wholesale
Moderate
Apparel
|
Wholesale
Footwear &
Accessories
|
Retail
|
Licensing,
Other &
Eliminations
|
Assets
Held
for Sale
|
Consolidated
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2007 |
$
1,146.4 |
$
703.5 |
$
1,127.7 |
$
209.9 |
$
49.1 |
$
- |
$
3,236.6 |
|
December 31,
2006 |
1,307.1 |
872.1 |
1,133.6 |
224.2 |
(356.7) |
620.8 |
3,801.1 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
1,895.1 |
1,107.2 |
1,084.7 |
273.3 |
(317.0) |
534.5 |
4,577.8 |
- 81 -
Revenues from external customers
and long-lived assets excluding deferred taxes related to continuing operations
in the United States and foreign countries are as follows:
On
or for the Year Ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
United States |
$ 3,523.2
|
$ 3,801.0
|
$ 4,262.3
|
Foreign countries |
325.3
|
286.0
|
269.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
3,848.5
|
$ 4,087.0
|
$ 4,532.2
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
United States |
$ 1,930.1
|
$ 2,088.1
|
$ 3,265.3
|
Foreign countries |
11.2
|
4.0
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
1,941.3
|
$ 2,092.1
|
$ 3,293.4
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Certain of our subsidiaries
function as co-issuers (fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and
several basis) of the outstanding debt of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
("Jones"), including Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc. ("Jones
USA"), Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc. ("Jones Holdings"),
Nine West Footwear Corporation ("Nine West") and Jones Retail
Corporation ("Jones Retail").
The following condensed
consolidating balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash
flows for the "Issuers" (consisting of Jones and Jones USA, Jones
Holdings, Nine West and Jones Retail, which are all our subsidiaries that act as
co-issuers and co-obligors) and the "Others" (consisting of all of our
other subsidiaries, excluding all obligor subsidiaries) have been prepared using
the equity method of accounting in accordance with the requirements for
presentation of such information. Separate financial statements and other
disclosures concerning Jones are not presented as Jones has no independent
operations or assets. There are no contractual restrictions on distributions
from Jones USA, Jones Holdings, Nine West or Jones Retail to Jones. On January
1, 2007, Kasper, Ltd. and Jones USA merged. As a result, the condensed
consolidating balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash
flows for prior periods have been restated for comparison purposes.
- 82 -
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
(In millions)
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
Issuers
|
Others
|
Eliminations
|
Cons-
olidated
|
|
Issuers
|
Others
|
Eliminations
|
Cons-
olidated
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 264.0 |
$ 38.8 |
$ - |
$ 302.8 |
|
$ 35.1 |
$ 29.2 |
$ - |
$ 64.3 |
|
Accounts
receivable |
205.3 |
131.7 |
- |
337.0 |
|
194.6 |
163.2 |
- |
357.8 |
|
Inventories |
358.5 |
165.7 |
(0.3) |
523.9 |
|
359.9 |
171.8 |
(0.9) |
530.8 |
|
Assets
held for sale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
620.8 |
- |
620.8 |
|
Prepaid
and refundable income taxes |
1.4 |
5.2 |
24.0 |
30.6 |
|
0.5 |
6.7 |
6.9 |
14.1 |
|
Deferred taxes |
13.6 |
19.4 |
0.9 |
33.9 |
|
28.4 |
25.5 |
(0.2) |
53.7 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
39.7 |
26.2 |
- |
65.9 |
|
39.9 |
27.6 |
- |
67.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
882.5 |
387.0 |
24.6 |
1,294.1 |
|
658.4 |
1,044.8 |
5.8 |
1,709.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment - net |
161.2 |
150.9 |
- |
312.1 |
|
157.7 |
121.8 |
- |
279.5 |
Due from
affiliates |
- |
971.7 |
(971.7) |
- |
|
51.8 |
755.6 |
(807.4) |
- |
Goodwill |
972.8 |
67.6 |
(66.5) |
973.9 |
|
1,479.1 |
172.3 |
(599.5) |
1,051.9 |
Other
intangibles - net |
0.3 |
617.7 |
- |
618.0 |
|
0.3 |
708.0 |
- |
708.3 |
Deferred
taxes |
20.4 |
- |
(19.1) |
1.3 |
|
13.7 |
- |
(13.7) |
- |
Investments
in subsidiaries |
1,746.8 |
- |
(1,746.8) |
- |
|
2,091.4 |
- |
(2,091.4) |
- |
Other assets |
26.2 |
11.0 |
- |
37.2 |
|
32.9 |
21.5 |
(2.0) |
52.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,810.2 |
$ 2,205.9 |
$ (2,779.5) |
$ 3,236.6 |
|
$ 4,485.3 |
$ 2,824.0 |
$ (3,508.2) |
$ 3,801.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
$
- |
$ - |
$ - |
$
- |
|
$ 100.0 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 100.0 |
|
Current
portion of capital lease obligations |
0.6 |
4.2 |
- |
4.8 |
|
1.5 |
2.6 |
- |
4.1 |
|
Accounts payable |
175.0 |
48.6 |
- |
223.6 |
|
189.0 |
88.9 |
- |
277.9 |
|
Liabilities related to
assets held for sale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
180.7 |
- |
180.7 |
|
Income
taxes payable |
19.7 |
1.0 |
(0.3) |
20.4 |
|
18.4 |
23.4 |
(16.4) |
25.4 |
|
Deferred taxes |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
0.2 |
(0.2) |
- |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities |
96.6 |
50.2 |
- |
146.8 |
|
101.2 |
35.5 |
- |
136.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
291.9 |
104.0 |
(0.3) |
395.6 |
|
410.1 |
331.3 |
(16.6) |
724.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
749.4 |
- |
- |
749.4 |
|
749.3 |
- |
- |
749.3 |
|
Obligations
under capital leases |
4.3 |
24.0 |
- |
28.3 |
|
11.1 |
24.7 |
- |
35.8 |
|
Deferred taxes |
- |
5.8 |
(5.8) |
- |
|
- |
10.0 |
(2.2) |
7.8 |
|
Due to
affiliates |
971.7 |
- |
(971.7) |
- |
|
755.6 |
51.8 |
(807.4) |
- |
|
Other |
50.8 |
15.7 |
- |
66.5 |
|
52.6 |
19.2 |
- |
71.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
1,776.2 |
45.5 |
(977.5) |
844.2 |
|
1,568.6 |
105.7 |
(809.6) |
864.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES |
2,068.1 |
149.5 |
(977.8) |
1,239.8 |
|
1,978.7 |
437.0 |
(826.2) |
1,589.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock and additional paid-in capital |
1,341.2 |
1,707.8 |
(1,707.8) |
1,341.2 |
|
1,321.5 |
1,979.9 |
(1,979.9) |
1,321.5 |
|
Retained earnings |
2,226.1 |
339.7 |
(85.0) |
2,480.8 |
|
2,521.4 |
404.3 |
(699.3) |
2,226.4 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) |
2.1 |
8.9 |
(8.9) |
2.1 |
|
(5.9) |
2.8 |
(2.8) |
(5.9) |
|
Treasury stock |
(1,827.3) |
- |
- |
(1,827.3) |
|
(1,330.4) |
- |
- |
(1,330.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
1,742.1 |
2,056.4 |
(1,801.7) |
1,996.8 |
|
2,506.6 |
2,387.0 |
(2,682.0) |
2,211.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
3,810.2 |
$
2,205.9 |
$
(2,779.5) |
$
3,236.6 |
|
$
4,485.3 |
$
2,824.0 |
$
(3,508.2) |
$
3,801.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 83 -
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
(In millions)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
Issuers
|
Others
|
Elim-
inations
|
Cons-
olidated
|
Net sales |
$
2,642.9 |
$
1,167.7 |
$
(17.3) |
$
3,793.3 |
Licensing
income |
0.1 |
51.9 |
- |
52.0 |
Service
and other revenue |
1.0 |
2.2 |
- |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
2,644.0 |
1,221.8 |
(17.3) |
3,848.5 |
Cost of goods
sold |
1,723.5 |
893.9 |
(8.3) |
2,609.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
920.5 |
327.9 |
(9.0) |
1,239.4 |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
981.6 |
131.6 |
(12.8) |
1,100.4 |
Trademark
impairments |
- |
88.0 |
- |
88.0 |
Goodwill
impairment |
394.7 |
78.0 |
(394.7) |
78.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
(loss) income |
(455.8) |
30.3 |
398.5 |
(27.0) |
Net interest
expense (income) and financing costs |
66.6 |
(18.8) |
- |
47.8 |
Gain on sale of
interest in Australian joint venture |
- |
8.2 |
- |
8.2 |
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
0.5 |
5.6 |
2.0 |
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
income from continuing
operations before benefit for income taxes |
(521.9) |
62.9 |
400.5 |
(58.5) |
(Benefit)
provision for
income taxes |
(147.4) |
43.1 |
(0.1) |
(104.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(374.5) |
19.8 |
400.6 |
45.9 |
Income
(loss) from
discontinued operations, net of tax |
291.8 |
(26.6) |
- |
265.2 |
Equity
in loss of subsidiaries |
(155.8) |
- |
155.8 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
$
(238.5) |
$
(6.8) |
$
556.4 |
$
311.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
Issuers
|
Others
|
Elim-
inations
|
Cons-
olidated
|
Net sales |
$
2,699.3 |
$
1,332.3 |
$
(16.8) |
$
4,014.8 |
Licensing
income |
0.1 |
51.0 |
- |
51.1 |
Service
and other revenue |
2.8 |
18.3 |
- |
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
2,702.2 |
1,401.6 |
(16.8) |
4,087.0 |
Cost of goods
sold |
1,675.0 |
1,000.3 |
(1.1) |
2,674.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
1,027.2 |
401.3 |
(15.7) |
1,412.8 |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
987.7 |
121.7 |
(13.1) |
1,096.3 |
Loss on sale of
Polo Jeans Company business |
22.8 |
22.3 |
- |
45.1 |
Trademark
impairments |
- |
50.2 |
- |
50.2 |
Goodwill
impairment |
- |
441.2 |
- |
441.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss) |
16.7 |
(234.1) |
(2.6) |
(220.0) |
Net interest
expense (income) and financing costs |
64.9 |
(17.9) |
- |
47.0 |
Gain on sale of
stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
17.4 |
- |
- |
17.4 |
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
0.5 |
4.5 |
(0.5) |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing
operations before benefit for income taxes |
(30.3) |
(211.7) |
(3.1) |
(245.1) |
Benefit for
income taxes |
- |
(61.0) |
(9.1) |
(70.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations |
(30.3) |
(150.7) |
6.0 |
(175.0) |
Income from
discontinued operations, net of tax |
- |
29.0 |
- |
29.0 |
Equity
in earnings of subsidiaries |
103.6 |
- |
(103.6) |
- |
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting for share-based payments, net of tax |
1.9 |
- |
- |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) |
$
75.2 |
$
(121.7) |
$
(97.6) |
$
(144.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
Issuers
|
Others
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
Net sales |
$
2,739.3 |
$ 1,753.3 |
$
(19.3) |
$
4,473.3 |
Licensing
income |
0.1 |
58.8 |
- |
58.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
2,739.4 |
1,812.1 |
(19.3) |
4,532.2 |
Cost of goods
sold |
1,710.3 |
1,245.8 |
(5.7) |
2,950.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
1,029.1 |
566.3 |
(13.6) |
1,581.8 |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
929.4 |
214.7 |
(15.8) |
1,128.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income |
99.7 |
351.6 |
2.2 |
453.5 |
Net interest
expense (income) and financing costs |
80.5 |
(10.6) |
- |
69.9 |
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
0.5 |
1.8 |
0.9 |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
19.7 |
364.0 |
3.1 |
386.8 |
Provision for
income taxes |
12.8 |
123.0 |
(1.8) |
134.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
continuing operations |
6.9 |
241.0 |
4.9 |
252.8 |
Income
from discontinued operations, net of tax |
- |
21.5 |
- |
21.5 |
Equity
in earnings of subsidiaries |
265.0 |
- |
(265.0) |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
$
271.9 |
$
262.5 |
$
(260.1) |
$
274.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
- - 84 -
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Issuers
|
Others
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
$
106.9 |
$
37.3 |
$
(23.7) |
$
120.5 |
|
Net cash provided by
operating activities
of discontinued operations |
- |
39.0 |
- |
39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities |
106.9 |
76.3 |
(23.7) |
159.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of Barneys, net of cash sold and selling costs |
845.5 |
- |
- |
845.5 |
|
Proceeds from sale of
interest in Australian joint venture |
- |
20.7 |
- |
20.7 |
|
Capital expenditures |
(59.5) |
(51.7) |
- |
(111.2) |
|
Proceeds from sales of
property, plant and equipment |
0.2 |
2.8 |
- |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by ( used in) investing
activities of continuing operations |
786.2 |
(28.2) |
- |
758.0 |
|
Net cash used in investing
activities of discontinued operations |
- |
(40.5) |
- |
(40.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing
activities |
786.2 |
(68.7) |
- |
717.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayment under credit facilities |
(100.0) |
- |
- |
(100.0) |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
(496.9) |
- |
- |
(496.9) |
|
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options |
11.1 |
- |
- |
11.1 |
|
Dividends paid |
(57.2) |
(23.7) |
23.7 |
(57.2) |
|
Net cash
transferred to discontinued operations |
(21.7) |
- |
- |
(21.7) |
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payment arrangements |
1.4 |
- |
- |
1.4 |
|
Other
items |
(0.8) |
(3.3) |
- |
(4.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities of continuing operations |
(664.1) |
(27.0) |
23.7 |
(667.4) |
|
Net cash
provided by financing activities of discontinued operations |
- |
17.9 |
- |
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities |
(664.1) |
(9.1) |
23.7 |
(649.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rates on cash |
- |
3.8 |
- |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents |
229.0 |
2.3 |
- |
231.3 |
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning, including cash reported under assets held for
sale |
35.0 |
36.5 |
- |
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, ending |
$
264.0 |
$ 38.8 |
$
- |
$
302.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Issuers
|
Others
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
$
321.6 |
$
65.8 |
$
(1.0) |
$
386.4 |
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
- |
37.5 |
- |
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities |
321.6 |
103.3 |
(1.0) |
423.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale of Polo Jeans Company business |
344.1 |
6.5 |
- |
350.6 |
|
Capital expenditures |
(62.2) |
(47.1) |
- |
(109.3) |
|
Net cash
received from sale of stock in Rubicon Retail Limited |
17.4 |
- |
- |
17.4 |
|
Proceeds from sales of
property, plant and equipment |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
of continuing operations |
299.4 |
(40.6) |
- |
258.8 |
|
Net cash
used in investing activities of discontinued operations |
- |
(61.2) |
- |
(61.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities |
299.4 |
(101.8) |
- |
197.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Senior Notes |
(225.0) |
- |
- |
(225.0) |
|
Net repayment under credit facilities |
(29.5) |
- |
- |
(29.5) |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
(306.2) |
- |
- |
(306.2) |
|
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options |
32.4 |
- |
- |
32.4 |
|
Dividends paid |
(55.7) |
(1.0) |
1.0 |
(55.7) |
|
Net cash
transferred to discontinued operations |
(24.0) |
- |
- |
(24.0) |
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payment arrangements |
3.4 |
- |
- |
3.4 |
|
Other
items |
(1.7) |
(2.5) |
- |
(4.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities of continuing operations |
(606.3) |
(3.5) |
1.0 |
(608.8) |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
of discontinued operations |
- |
24.0 |
- |
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided
by financing activities |
(606.3) |
20.5 |
1.0 |
(584.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rates on cash |
- |
(0.1) |
- |
(0.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase cash and cash equivalents |
14.7 |
21.9 |
- |
36.6 |
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning, including cash reported under assets held for
sale |
20.3 |
14.6 |
- |
34.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, ending, including cash reported under assets held for sale |
$ 35.0 |
$ 36.5 |
$
- |
$ 71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Issuers
|
Others
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
$
362.9 |
$
15.5 |
$
(10.7) |
$
367.7 |
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
- |
59.7 |
- |
59.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities |
362.9 |
75.2 |
(10.7) |
427.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(4.1) |
- |
- |
(4.1) |
|
Capital expenditures |
(37.2) |
(29.7) |
- |
(66.9) |
|
Acquisition
of intangibles |
- |
(0.1) |
- |
(0.1) |
|
Proceeds from sales of
property, plant and equipment |
0.3 |
3.3 |
- |
3.6 |
|
Other |
- |
(0.5) |
- |
(0.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in investing activities of continuing operations |
(41.0) |
(27.0) |
- |
(68.0) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
of discontinued operations |
- |
(20.6) |
- |
(20.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in investing activities |
(41.0) |
(47.6) |
- |
(88.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Senior Notes |
(129.6) |
- |
- |
(129.6) |
|
Net
borrowing under credit facilities |
60.3 |
- |
- |
60.3 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
(235.2) |
- |
- |
(235.2) |
|
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options |
13.4 |
- |
- |
13.4 |
|
Dividends paid |
(52.3) |
(10.7) |
10.7 |
(52.3) |
|
Net cash transferred from
discontinued operations |
32.9 |
- |
- |
32.9 |
|
Other
items |
(3.4) |
(1.6) |
- |
(5.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities of continuing operations |
(313.9) |
(12.3) |
10.7 |
(315.5) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities
of discontinued operations |
- |
(32.9) |
- |
(32.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in financing activities |
(313.9) |
(45.2) |
10.7 |
(348.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rates on cash |
- |
(0.5) |
- |
(0.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
8.0 |
(18.1) |
- |
(10.1) |
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning, including cash reported under assets held for
sale |
12.3 |
32.7 |
- |
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, ending, including cash reported under assets held for
sale |
$
20.3 |
$
14.6 |
$
- |
$
34.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 85 -
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Unaudited interim consolidated financial information for the
two years ended December 31, 2007 is summarized as follows:
|
(In millions except per share data)
|
First Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third Quarter
|
Fourth Quarter
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
$ 1,064.5
|
$ 894.5
|
$ 1,011.8
|
$ 822.4
|
|
Total revenues |
1,078.5
|
903.9
|
1,027.6
|
838.5
|
|
Gross profit |
365.1
|
290.2
|
326.5
|
257.6
|
|
Operating income (loss)
(1) |
83.2
|
(72.3)
|
59.2
|
(97.1)
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
(2) |
44.4
|
(51.1)
|
138.4
|
(85.8)
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued
operations (3) |
3.4
|
4.0
|
261.7
|
(4.0)
|
|
Net income (loss) |
47.8
|
(47.1)
|
400.1
|
(89.8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from
continuing operations |
$ 0.42
|
$ (0.48)
|
$ 1.39
|
$ (1.01)
|
|
Basic earnings per share
from discontinued operations |
0.03
|
0.04
|
2.62
|
(0.05)
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
0.45
|
(0.44)
|
4.01
|
(1.06)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share from continuing operations |
$ 0.41
|
$ (0.48)
|
$ 1.37
|
$ (1.01)
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share from discontinued operations |
0.03
|
0.04
|
2.60
|
(0.05)
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share |
0.44
|
(0.44)
|
3.97
|
(1.06)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
$ 0.14
|
$ 0.14
|
$ 0.14
|
$0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
$ 1,063.6
|
$ 909.6
|
$ 1,058.3
|
$ 983.2
|
|
Total revenues |
1,078.5
|
923.9
|
1,077.5
|
1,007.1
|
|
Gross profit |
387.4
|
337.2
|
372.9
|
315.3
|
|
Operating income (loss) (4) |
78.0
|
56.7
|
102.0
|
(456.8)
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
20.6
|
30.4
|
58.4
|
(284.4)
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
3.3
|
6.2
|
4.6
|
14.9
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for share-based
payments |
1.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Net income (loss) |
25.8
|
36.6
|
63.0
|
(269.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from
continuing operations |
$
0.18
|
$
0.27
|
$
0.53
|
$
(2.65)
|
|
Basic earnings per share
from discontinued operations |
0.03
|
0.06
|
0.04
|
0.14
|
|
Basic
earnings per share from the cumulative effect of change in accounting
for share-based payments |
0.02
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
0.23
|
0.33
|
0.57
|
(2.51)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share from continuing operations |
$ 0.18
|
$ 0.27
|
$ 0.52
|
$ (2.65)
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share from discontinued operations |
0.03
|
0.05
|
0.04
|
0.14
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
from the cumulative effect of change in accounting for share-based
payments |
0.01
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share |
0.22
|
0.32
|
0.56
|
(2.51)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
$
0.12
|
$
0.12
|
$
0.12
|
$
0.14
|
Quarterly figures may not add to full year
due to rounding.
(1) |
Includes trademark impairments
of $80.5 million and $7.5 million in the third and fourth fiscal
quarters of 2007, respectively, and goodwill impairment of $78.0 million
in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2007.
|
(2) |
Includes $107.7 million reversal of a deferred tax
valuation allowance in the third fiscal quarter of 2007 previously created from
capital loss carryforwards arising from the sale of our Polo Jeans Company
business in 2006.
|
(3) |
Includes $254.2 million from sale of Barneys in the third
fiscal quarter of 2007.
|
(4) |
Includes trademark impairments
of $50.2 million and goodwill impairment of $441.2 million in the fourth
fiscal quarter of 2006. |
- 86 -
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
The purpose of disclosure controls
is to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with
or submitted to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules
and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. The purpose of internal controls is to
provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized, our
assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use and our transactions
are properly recorded and reported to permit the preparation of our financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our management does not expect
that our disclosure controls or our internal controls will prevent all error and
all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the objectives of
the control system are met. The design of a control system must also reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, with the benefits of controls
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud (if any) within the company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that simple errors or mistakes can occur.
Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The
design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any
design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Our internal controls are
evaluated on an ongoing basis by our Internal Audit department, by other
personnel in our organization and by our independent auditors in connection with
their audit and review activities. The overall goals of these various evaluation
activities are to monitor our disclosure and internal controls and to make
modifications as necessary, as disclosure and internal controls are intended to
be dynamic systems that change (including improvements and corrections) as
conditions warrant. Part of this evaluation is to determine whether there were
any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls, or
whether we had identified any acts of fraud involving personnel who have a
significant role in the our internal controls. Significant deficiencies are
control issues that could have a significant adverse effect on the ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data in the financial
statements; material weaknesses are particularly serious conditions where the
internal control does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that
misstatements caused by error or fraud may occur in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.
Based upon this evaluation, our
President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded
that both our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
required to be included in our periodic SEC filings and ensuring that
information required to be disclosed by us in these periodic filings is
recorded, processed,
- 87 -
summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SEC's rules and forms and that our internal controls are effective in ensuring that our financial statements are fairly
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
We have made changes to our
internal controls and procedures over financial reporting to address the
implementation of SAP, an enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system,
that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2006. We began the process of
implementing SAP throughout Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and our consolidated
subsidiaries. SAP will integrate our operational and financial systems and
expand the functionality of our financial reporting processes. During the fourth
fiscal quarter of 2007, our wholesale better apparel businesses were converted
to this system. We have adequately controlled the transition to the new
processes and controls, with no negative impact to our internal control
environment. We expect to roll out the implementation of this system to all
locations over a multi-year period. As the phased roll out occurs, we will
experience changes in internal control over financial reporting each quarter. We
expect this ERP system to further advance our control environment by automating
manual processes, improving management visibility and standardizing processes as
its full capabilities are utilized.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management's report on Internal
Control Over Financial reporting appears on page 46. Our independent registered
public accounting firm, BDO Seidman, LLP, has issued an audit report on our
internal control over financial reporting, which appears on page 47.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information about our
directors appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Election of
Directors" is incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics and a Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial
Officers, which applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Controller and other personnel performing similar functions. Both codes are
posted on our website, www.jny.com under the "Our Company - Corporate
Governance" caption. We intend to make all required disclosures regarding
any amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of the Code of Ethics for Senior
Executive and Financial Officers by posting such information on our website.
The information appearing in the
Proxy Statement relating to the members of the Audit Committee and the Audit
Committee financial expert under the captions "Corporate Governance - Board
Structure and Committee Composition" and "Corporate Governance - Board
Structure and Committee Composition - Audit Committee" and the information
appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" is incorporated herein by this
reference.
The balance of the information
required by this item is contained in the discussion entitled "Executive
Officers of the Registrant" in Part I of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information appearing in the
Proxy Statement under the captions "Executive Compensation,"
"Corporate Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation" and the information appearing in the Proxy Statement
relating to the compensation of directors under the caption "Corporate
Governance - Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Guidelines" is
incorporated herein by this reference.
- 88 -
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information appearing in the
Proxy Statement under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners" is incorporated herein by this reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table gives information about our common stock that may be
issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our
existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007. For further
information, see "Stock Options and Restricted Stock" in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Plan Category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights |
Number of securities remaining available for future
issuance under equity compensation plans |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
7,601,835 |
$32.44 |
5,234,898 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Total |
7,601,835 |
$32.44 |
5,234,898 |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information appearing in the
Proxy Statement under the captions "Corporate Governance - Independence of
Directors," "Corporate Governance - Board Structure and Committee
Composition" and "Corporate Governance - Policy with Respect to
Related Person Transactions" is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information appearing
in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Fees Paid to Independent
Registered Public Accountants" is hereby incorporated by reference.
- 89 -
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
|
1. |
Financial Statements. |
|
|
The following financial statements are included in Item
8 of this report: |
|
|
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31,
2007 and 2006 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations - Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'
Equity - Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (includes
certain supplemental financial information required by Item 8 of Form
10-K) |
|
2. |
The schedule and report of independent
registered public accounting firm thereon, listed in the Index to Financial Statement
Schedules attached hereto. |
|
3. |
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto. |
- 90 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
February 22, 2008 |
|
JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Wesley R. Card
Wesley R. Card
President and Chief Executive Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,
that each person whose signature appears on this page to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K")
constitutes and appoints Wesley R. Card, John T. McClain and Ira M. Dansky, and
each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power
of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to the Form 10-K, and
file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and grants unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might and
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
/s/ Wesley R. Card
Wesley R. Card |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ Sidney Kimmel
Sidney Kimmel |
Chairman and Director
|
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ John T. McClain
John T. McClain |
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ Christopher R. Cade
Christopher R. Cade |
Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting
Officer and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ Matthew H. Kamens
Matthew H. Kamens |
Director |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ J. Robert Kerrey
J. Robert Kerrey |
Director |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ Ann N. Reese
Ann N. Reese |
Director |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ Gerald C. Crotty
Gerald C. Crotty |
Director |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ Lowell W. Robinson
Lowell W. Robinson |
Director |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ Frits D. van Paasschen
Frits D. van Paasschen |
Director |
February 22, 2008 |
/s/ Donna F. Zarcone
Donna F. Zarcone |
Director |
February 22, 2008 |
- 91 -
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Schedule II.
Schedule II. Valuation and qualifying accounts
Schedules other than those listed above have been omitted
since the information is not applicable, not required or is included in the
respective financial statements or notes thereto.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit1
|
2.1 |
Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated September 10, 1998, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc.,
SAI Acquisition Corp., Sun Apparel, Inc. and the selling shareholders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on Form
8-K dated September 24, 1998). |
2.2 |
Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of March 1, 1999, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Jill
Acquisition Sub Inc. and Nine West Group Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 2, 1999). |
2.3 |
Securities
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 31, 2000, among Jones Apparel
Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Victoria + Co Ltd. and
the Shareholders and Warrantholders of Victoria + Co Ltd (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended April 2, 2000). |
2.4 |
Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of April 13, 2001, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., MCN
Acquisition Corp. and McNaughton Apparel Group Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13,
2001). |
2.5 |
Purchase
Agreement dated as of August 7, 2003 between Kasper A.S.L., Ltd. and Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended October 4, 2003). |
2.6 |
Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of June 18, 2004, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., MSC
Acquisition Corp. and Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.D.3 of Amendment No. 16 to our Schedule TO dated June 21,
2004). |
3.1 |
Articles of
Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998). |
3.2 |
Amended and Restated By-Laws
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the six months ended July 7, 2007). |
4.1 |
Form of
Certificate evidencing shares of common stock of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Shelf Registration
Statement on Form S-3, filed on October 28, 1998 (Registration No.
333-66223)). |
4.2 |
Exchange and Note Registration
Rights Agreement dated June 15, 1999, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc.,
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., Chase Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Salomon Smith Barney Inc.,
BancBoston Robertson Stephens Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, ING
Baring Furman Selz LLC, Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, Tucker Anthony Cleary
Gull, Brean Murray & Co., Inc. and The Buckingham Research Group
Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended July 4, 1999). |
4.3 |
Indenture
dated as of November 22, 2004, among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Jones
Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., Nine West
Footwear Corporation and Jones Retail Corporation, as Issuers and SunTrust
Bank, as Trustee, including Form of 4.250% Senior Notes due 2009, Form of
5.125% Senior Notes due 2014 and Form of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). |
- 92 -
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
4.4 |
Form of
Exchange and Note Registration Rights Agreement dated November 22, 2004
among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Jones
Apparel Group USA, Inc., Nine West Footwear Corporation and Jones Retail
Corporation, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., as Representatives of the Several Initial Purchasers listed in
Schedule I thereto, with respect to 4.250% Senior Notes due 2009, 5.125%
Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.15 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). |
4.5 |
First Supplemental Indenture
dated as of December 31, 2006, by and among Jones Apparel Group, Inc.,
Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., Nine
West Footwear Corporation, Jones Retail Corporation, Kasper, Ltd., as
Issuers, and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor in interest to
SunTrust Bank), as Trustee, relating to the 4.250% Senior Notes Due 2009,
5.125% Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006). |
10.1 |
1991 Stock
Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of our Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 3, 1991 (Registration No. 33-39742)).+ |
10.2 |
1996 Stock Option Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996).+ |
10.3 |
1999 Stock
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).+ |
10.4 |
Form of Agreement Evidencing
Stock Option Awards Under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).+ |
10.5 |
Form of
Agreement Evidencing Restricted Stock Awards Under the 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 2, 2005).+ |
10.6 |
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated March 11, 2002, between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and
Peter Boneparth (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001).+ |
10.7 |
Employment
Agreement dated as of July 1, 2000, between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and
Sidney Kimmel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended October 1, 2000).+ |
10.8 |
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated March 11, 2002, between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and
Wesley R. Card (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 6, 2002).+ |
10.9 |
Employment
agreement dated as of January 1, 2002 between Lynne F. Cote' and Norton
McNaughton of Squire, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007).+ |
10.10 |
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated April 4, 2002, between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Ira
M. Dansky (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 6, 2002).+ |
10.11 |
Buying Agency Agreement dated August 31, 2001, between Nine
West Group Inc. and Bentley HSTE Far East Services Limited (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine
months ended October 6, 2001).
|
10.12 |
Buying Agency Agreement dated
November 30, 2001, between Nine West Group Inc. and Bentley HSTE Far East
Services, Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001). |
10.13 |
Amendment dated February 28, 2003 to the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).+
|
- 93 -
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
10.14 |
Amendment
dated February 28, 2003 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Peter Boneparth (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.23 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).+ |
10.15 |
Amendment dated February 28, 2003 to the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Ira M. Dansky
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).+
|
10.16 |
Assignment of
and Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 30, 2005 to Employment Agreement
between Lynne F. Cote' and McNaughton Apparel Group Inc. (formerly known
as Norton McNaughton of Squire, Inc.)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007).+ |
10.17 |
Amendment No. 2 dated March 8, 2006 to Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated March 8, 2006).+
|
10.18 |
Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement dated as of June 5, 2006 between Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. and Efthimios P. Sotos (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2006).+ |
10.19 |
Form of Deferred Compensation
Plan for Outside Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002).+ |
10.20 |
Form of
Agreement Evidencing Restricted Stock Awards for Outside Directors Under
the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 2,
2005).+
|
10.21 |
Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of
June 15, 2004, by and among Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional
Obligors referred to therein, the Lenders referred to therein, Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers
and Joint Bookrunners, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent, Citibank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Syndication
Agents, and Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC and Suntrust Bank as
Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended July 3, 2004).
|
10.22 |
Amendment to
the Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of November
17, 2004 among Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors
referred to therein, the Lenders referred to therein and Wachovia Bank,
National Association as agent for the Lenders (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.31 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004).
|
10.23 |
Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of
May 16, 2005, by and among Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional
Obligors referred to therein, the Lenders referred to therein, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Co-Lead Arrangers and
Joint Bookrunners, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative
Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank and Citibank, N.A., as Syndication Agents, and
Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC and Suntrust Bank as Documentation
Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
10.24 |
Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004).+ |
10.25 |
Amendment No. 3 dated April 17,
2007 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 17, 2007).+ |
10.26 |
Summary Sheet
of Compensation of Non-Management Directors of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006)+
|
10.27* |
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
Severance Plan, as amended, and Summary Plan Description.+ |
- 94 -
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
10.28 |
Jones Apparel
Group, Inc. 2007 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Annex C of our Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders).+
|
10.29 |
Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 22, 2007 among Jones
Apparel Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc., Barneys New York,
Inc., Istithmar Bentley Holding Co. and Istithmar Bentley Acquisition Co.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated June 22, 2007).
|
10.30 |
Amendment No.
4 dated July 12, 2007 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Wesley R. Card (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2007).+
|
10.31 |
Employment Agreement dated as of July 11, 2007 between Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. and John T. McClain (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2007).+
|
10.32 |
Separation
Agreement dated as of July 11, 2007, between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and
Peter Boneparth (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Current
Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2007).+
|
10.33 |
Letter Amendment and Waiver dated July 27, 2007, by and among
Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors referred to therein,
the Lenders referred to therein, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2007).
|
10.34 |
Letter
Amendment and Waiver dated July 27, 2007, by and among Jones Apparel Group
USA, Inc., the Additional Obligors referred to therein, the Lenders
referred to therein, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2007).
|
10.35 |
Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 8,
2007 among Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc.,
Barneys New York, Inc., Istithmar Bentley Holding Co. and Istithmar Bentley
Acquisition Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current
Report on Form 8-K dated August 8, 2007).
|
10.36 |
Master
Confirmation dated September 6, 2007 between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and
Goldman, Sachs & Co. relating to accelerated stock repurchase
agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report
on Form 8-K dated September 6, 2007).
|
10.37 |
Supplemental Confirmation dated September 6, 2007 between
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. relating to
accelerated stock repurchase agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 6, 2007).#
|
10.38* |
Letter
agreement dated as of November 7, 2007 between Lynne F. Cote' and Jones
Apparel Group USA ,Inc.+
|
10.39* |
Amendment No. 2 dated December 10, 2007 to Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement between Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Ira M.
Dansky.+
|
10.40* |
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 20,
2008 between Nine West Footwear Corporation and Andrew Cohen.+
|
12* |
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
21* |
List of
Subsidiaries.
|
23* |
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP.
|
31* |
Certifications
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32o |
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
- 95 -
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
99.1 |
Decision and
Order of the Federal Trade Commission In the Matter of Nine West Group
Inc., Docket No. C-3937, dated April 11, 2000 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended April 2, 2000).
|
____________________
1 Exhibits filed with Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K or
Schedule 14A of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. were filed under SEC File No.
001-10746.
* Filed herewith.
o Furnished herewith.
# Portions deleted pursuant to application for
confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
+ Management
contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
- 96 -
|
BDO Seidman, LLP
Accountants and Consultants |
330 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 885-8000
Fax: (212) 697-1299 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
New York, New York
The audits referred to in our report dated February 19, 2008 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Jones Apparel Group, which is contained in
Item 8 of this Form 10-K also included the audit of the financial statement
schedule listed in the accompanying index. This financial statement schedule is
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
New York, New York
February 19, 2008
- 97 -
SCHEDULE II
JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2006 AND 2007
(In Millions)
Column A
|
Column B
|
Column C
|
Column D
|
Column E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
beginning of period
|
Charged
against revenues or to costs and expenses
|
Charged to
other accounts
|
Deductions
|
Balance at
end of period
|
Accounts receivable
allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
year ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
2006
2007 |
$
8.0
5.1
2.5
|
$
(0.3)
(0.8)
0.2
|
$
-
-
-
|
|
$
2.6
1.8
0.7
|
(1)
(1)
(1) |
$
5.1
2.5
2.0
|
|
Allowance
for sales returns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
year ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
2006
2007 |
5.8
6.4
6.8
|
28.4
28.9
27.4
|
0.2
(0.5)
0.3
|
(3)
(3)
(3)
|
28.0
28.0
26.7
|
(2)
(2)
(2)
|
6.4
6.8
7.8
|
|
Allowance for sales
discounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
2006
2007 |
16.1
14.6
11.3
|
114.4
107.6
90.0
|
-
-
-
|
|
115.9
110.9
92.0
|
(2)
(2)
(2)
|
14.6
11.3
9.3
|
|
Allowance for co-op
advertising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
2006
2007 |
12.2
10.8
10.0
|
34.8
23.2
25.7
|
-
(0.2)
0.1
|
(3)
(3)
|
36.2
23.8
26.4
|
(2)
(2)
(2) |
10.8
10.0
9.4
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
year ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
2006
2007 |
8.5
9.2
112.4
|
0.7
112.4
1.2
|
-
-
- |
|
-
9.2
108.4
|
(4)
(4)
|
9.2
112.4
5.2
|
_________________________
(1) |
Doubtful accounts written off against
accounts receivable. |
(2) |
Deductions taken by customers written off against accounts
receivable.
|
(3) |
Represents effects of foreign currency
translation. |
(4) |
Deferred tax asset written off
against the deferred tax valuation allowance. |
- 98 -