-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, Uk+Hj4u/aVJWMAf704nL+KdEpluwTe0qT/oL+DdkhV0uBJYP6pLIL1mfi8OQfVqq 9wjcetZDpPGGrBVQD5Lg0g== 0000950005-09-000165.txt : 20090331 0000950005-09-000165.hdr.sgml : 20090331 20090331171904 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950005-09-000165 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20081231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20090331 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20090331 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: REGAN HOLDING CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000870069 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: LIFE INSURANCE [6311] IRS NUMBER: 680211359 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-19704 FILM NUMBER: 09720285 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2090 MARINA AVE CITY: PETALUMA STATE: CA ZIP: 94954 BUSINESS PHONE: 7077788638 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2090 MARINA AVE CITY: PETALUMA STATE: CA ZIP: 94954 10-K 1 p20311form10k.htm ANNUAL REPORT                   UNITED STATES            SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION               Washington, D

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10–K

(Mark One)

[X]

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

OR

[__]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________ to ________________

Commission file number 000–19704

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

California

68-0211359

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

incorporation or organization)

2090 Marina Avenue, Petaluma, California 94954

(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

(707) 778-8638

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

Common Stock, No Par Value

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES [__] NO [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES [__] NO [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [__]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [__]

Accelerated filer [__]

Smaller reporting company filer [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES [__] NO [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

$616,000

There is currently no trading market for the registrant’s stock. Accordingly, the foregoing aggregate market value is based upon the price at which the registrant would have repurchased its stock had it repurchased any stock in the last fiscal year.

As of March 15, 2009, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Series A Common Stock was 23,525,000 and the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Series B Common Stock was 550,000.  The registrant has no other shares outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed by amendment or pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with Regan Holding Corp.’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on September 14, 2009 , are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.






TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page


Part I

Item 1.

 Business

1

Item 1A.

 Risk Factors

4

Item 1B.

 Unresolved Staff Comments

8

Item 2.

 Properties

8

Item 3.

 Legal Proceedings

8

Item 4.

 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

8


Part II

Item 5.

 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of

 Equity Securities

9

Item 6.

 Selected Financial Data

10

Item 7.

 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     11

Item 7A.

 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

20

Item 8.

 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

    21

Item 9.

 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

43

Item 9A.

 Controls and Procedures

43

Item 9A(T) Controls and Procedures

43

Item 9B.

 Other Information

44


Part III

Item 10.

 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

45

Item 11.

 Executive Compensation

   45

Item 12.

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   45

Item 13.

 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   45

Item 14.

 Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   45


Part IV

Item 15.

 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

46





PART I

Item 1. Business

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this report may contain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. See “Management’s and Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Forward-Looking Statements.”

General Development of Business

Regan Holding Corp. (“Regan Holding”) is a holding company, incorporated in the State of California in 1990, whose primary operating subsidiary is Legacy Marketing Group (“Legacy Marketing”).  Legacy Marketing designs and markets fixed annuity products on behalf of certain unaffiliated insurance carriers in each of the United States, except Alabama and New York.   

Legacy Marketing’s primary marketing agreements are with American National Insurance Company (“American National”), Investors Insurance Corporation (“Investors Insurance”), OM Financial Life Insurance Company/Americom Life (“OM Financial (Americom)”), and Washington National Insurance Company (“Washington National”). The marketing agreements grant Legacy Marketing the exclusive right to market certain proprietary fixed annuity products issued by these insurance carriers.   An annuity is a contract in which an insurance company makes a series of income payments at regular intervals in return for a premium that a policyholder has paid. Annuities are most often bought for future retirement income. Only an annuity can pay an income that can be guaranteed to last as long as the policyholder lives. Under the terms of these agreements, Legacy Marketing is responsible for recruiting ind ependent insurance agents (who we refer to as “Producers”), who have contracted with Legacy Marketing to sell fixed annuity products, and are appointed with the applicable insurance carrier.  For these sales, the insurance carriers pay marketing allowances and commissions to Legacy Marketing based on the premium amount of insurance policies placed inforce.  Legacy Marketing is responsible for paying sales commissions to the Producers.

Legacy Marketing sells fixed annuity products through a network of Producers.  Each Producer has entered into a non-exclusive agreement with Legacy Marketing, which defines the parties’ business relationship.  Such agreements typically may be terminated by either party with or without cause or prior notice.

Legacy Marketing’s sales network is built on a multi-level structure in which Producers may recruit other Producers.  Recruited Producers are referred to as “downline” Producers within the original Producer’s network. Recruited Producers may also recruit other Producers, creating a hierarchy under the original Producer.  The standard Producer contract contains a nine-level design in which a Producer may advance from one level to the next based on sales commission amounts earned or the size of the Producer’s downline network.  As a Producer advances to higher levels within the system, he/she receives higher commissions on sales made through his/her downline network.  This creates a financial incentive for Producers to build a hierarchy of downline Producers, which contributes to their financial growth and to the growth of Legacy Marketing.  If a Producer leaves the network, his/her do wnline Producers can still remain contracted with Legacy Marketing and receive sales commissions.  Advancements to higher levels can occur as often as every three months. Producers at the highest levels are called “Wholesalers.”  

Legacy Marketing provides tools and services that assist Wholesalers with recruiting, training, managing, and support responsibilities associated with the Producers in their hierarchy.  In addition, Legacy Marketing assists Producers with programs designed to increase their sales and better serve their clients.  Recruiting and training programs include visual presentations, informational videos and seminars, and advertising material guidelines.  Legacy Marketing also produces product information, sales brochures, pre-approved advertisements and recruiting materials.

Legacy Marketing works closely with the insurance carriers in product design and development. Legacy Marketing’s actuarial and marketing departments work with the insurance carriers to design proprietary fixed annuity products to be marketed by Legacy Marketing. All of these products include guarantees for the benefit of policyholders and are guaranteed by the issuing insurance carriers. These guarantees generally include:

a contractually guaranteed minimum interest rate; and

the ability to allocate among various crediting rate strategies.



1




The marketing agreements allow Legacy Marketing to enter into similar arrangements with other insurance carriers.  The marketing agreement with American National expires on November 15, 2009, and may be renewed by mutual agreement for successive one-year terms.  The agreement may be terminated by either party upon twelve months prior written notice without cause, and may be terminated by either party immediately for cause.  The marketing agreement with Investors Insurance expires on March 31, 2009, and will be renewed automatically for successive one-year terms unless terminated earlier by either party upon twelve months prior written notice without cause.  The marketing agreement with OM Financial (Americom) expires on June 10, 2009, and will automatically renew for successive one-year periods, unless terminated by Legacy Marketing with twelve months written notice or by OM Financial (Americom) with at least six months written notice.  Either party may terminate the agreements immediately for cause.  The marketing agreement with Washington National expires on October 10, 2009, and may be renewed by mutual agreement for successive one-year terms, unless terminated by either party upon twelve months prior written notice without cause, and by either party immediately for cause.

In addition to the marketing agreements, Legacy Marketing had administrative agreements with each of the four insurance carriers listed above.  Effective October 17, 2007, Legacy Marketing entered into an agreement and strategic alliance with a subsidiary of Perot Systems Corporation (“Perot Systems”), whereby Legacy Marketing transferred its third party administration services function and the employees located in Rome, Georgia, who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems’ assumption of such administrative service functions.  

We owned an office building in Rome, Georgia, which was used to accommodate some of Legacy Marketing’s administrative activities.  We financed the property with a mortgage loan, which totaled $2.6 million at December 31, 2007.  On October 17, 2007, we entered into a lease with Perot Systems whereby Perot Systems leased our offices in Rome, Georgia, for a ten-year term at an initial rental price of $8.00 per square foot (a lease amount of approximately $300,000 per year).  On May 23, 2008, the Company sold its office building in Rome, Georgia for $3.5 million for a gain of $214,000. Proceeds from the sale of the building were used to repay the mortgage on the property, the outstanding balance of which was $2.6 million. As a result of the sale, the lease with Perot Systems was terminated.

On May 31, 2007, Regan Holding and two of its subsidiaries, Legacy Financial Services Inc. (“Legacy Financial”) and Legacy Advisory Services Inc., entered into an agreement with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation whereby Legacy Financial transferred its registered representatives and customer accounts to Multi-Financial Securities Corporation.  Under the agreement, on September 28, 2007, Multi-Financial Securities Corporation paid Legacy Financial $1.0 million (11.5%) of the aggregate gross dealer concessions earned at Legacy Financial Services between May 1, 2006, and April 30, 2007, by those transferred representatives who were, as of the measurement date (as defined in the agreement), registered with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation and in good standing with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”,).  In addition, on each of the first four anniversary dates of the measurement date, subject to certain conditions, Multi-Financial Securities Corporation is obligated to pay Legacy Financial Services an amount representing up to four and a half percent (4.5%) of each transferred representative’s aggregate gross dealer concessions earned with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation during the one year period prior to such anniversary date. As of December 31, 2008, Legacy Financial did not meet the specified terms in order to receive the second payment from Multi-Financial Securities Corporation and does not expect to receive any payments related to this agreement in the future.

Legacy Financial was registered as a broker-dealer with, and was subject to regulation by, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), FINRA, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, and various state agencies.  As a result of federal and state broker-dealer registration and self-regulatory organization memberships, Legacy Financial wa s subject to regulation that covers many aspects of its securities business.  This regulation covers matters such as capital requirements, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and employee-related matters, including qualification and licensing of supervisory and sales personnel. Also, these regulations included supervisory and organizational procedures intended to ensure compliance with securities laws and prevent improper trading on material nonpublic information.  Rules of the self-regulatory organizations are designed to promote high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.  A particular focus of the applicable regulations concerns the relationship between broker-dealers and their customers.  As a result, many aspects of the broker-dealer customer relationship are subject to regulation, including “suitability” determinations as to customer transactions, limitations in the amounts that may be charged to customers, and correspondence with c ustomers. As of September 29, 2008 Legacy Financial withdrew as a broker-dealer registered with FINRA.



2




On January 25, 2007, prospectdigital LLC ("prospectdigital"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Regan Holding, sold certain of its assets, which primarily included fixed assets and other miscellaneous operating assets, to PD Holdings LLC ("PD Holdings").  In addition, PD Holdings agreed to assume certain liabilities of prospectdigital.  The action was taken in a continuing effort to reduce Regan Holding’s operating expenses, as prospectdigital continued to sustain losses through the date of sale. Lynda Pitts, Chief Executive Officer, and R. Preston Pitts, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Regan Holding, are the primary owners of PD Holdings.  In connection with the sale, Legacy Marketing and prospectdigital also entered into a service agreement with PD Holdings to provide certain administrative services to PD Holdings for a fee equal to the cost of the se rvices provided.

Prospectdigital received $116,000 in consideration of the sale, which was greater than the estimated fair value of the assets of prospectdigital being sold, as determined by a third-party independent valuation.  The amount of consideration was approved by the Board of Directors of Regan Holding.

On July 20, 2006, Legacy Marketing entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Washington National Insurance Company (the “Lender”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Lender made a non-revolving multiple advance term loan (the “Term Loan”) to Legacy Marketing totaling $6.0 million.  On April 12, 2007, Legacy Marketing amended certain terms of the Credit Agreement through the execution of Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement, as so amended, the “Amended Agreement”) and (1) extended the final maturity of the loan under the Credit Agreement from April 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012; (2) changed certain of the requirements for mandatory prepayments under the Credit Agreement; (3) changed certain terms of the financial covenants specified in the Credit Agreement; and (4) revised certain definitions contained in the Credit Agreement. O n March 28, 2008, the balance due of $6.0 million, plus accrued interest, on the Credit Agreement was repaid.

On November 18, 2005, Regan Holding sold its office buildings in Petaluma, California for $12.8 million.  Regan Holding and the third party buyer (the “Buyer”) further agreed to enter into a ten year lease agreement, concurrently with the sale of the buildings, whereby it leased back 71,612 square feet through March 14, 2007, and will continue to lease back 47,612 square feet for the remainder of the lease term.  The monthly base rent was $1.33 per square foot in 2008 and $1.29 per square foot in 2007 and will increase annually by three percent during the term of the lease, in addition to monthly taxes and operating expenses.  

In January 2006, management of Regan Holding decided to discontinue the operations of Values Financial Network (“VFN”).  VFN incurred losses from operations of $579,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005.  Regan Holding incurred insignificant costs in connection with exiting the operations of VFN.  

Competitive Business Conditions

The fixed annuity business is rapidly evolving and intensely competitive. Legacy Marketing’s primary market is fixed annuity products sold through independent Producers.  Fixed annuity product sales in the United States were approximately $109 billion in 2008. Some of Legacy Marketing’s top competitors designing, marketing, and selling fixed annuity products through independent sales channels are Allianz Life of North America, American Equity Investment Life,  and Aviva USA.  These competitors may have greater financial resources than Legacy Marketing.  However, we believe that Legacy Marketing’s business model allows greater flexibility, as it can adjust the mix of business sold if one or more of its carriers were to experience capital constraints or other events that affect their business models. Legacy Marketing’s competitors may respond more quickly to new or emerging products and changes in customer requirements.  We are not aware of any significant new means of competition, products or services that our competitors provide or will soon provide. However, in the highly competitive fixed annuity marketplace, new distribution models, product innovations and technological advances may occur at any time and could present Legacy Marketing with competitive challenges.  There can be no assurance that Legacy Marketing will be able to compete successfully.  In addition, Legacy Marketing’s business model relies significantly on its Wholesaler distribution network to effectively market its products competitively.  Maintaining relationships with these Wholesaler distribution networks requires introducing new products and services to the market in an efficient and timely manner, offering competitive commission schedules, and providing superior marketing, product training, and support.  Due to competition among insurance companies and insurance marketing organizations for succ essful Wholesalers, there can be no assurance that Legacy Marketing will be able to retain some or all of its Wholesaler distribution networks.

Recent Industry Developments

During the past few years, several proposals relating to our business have been made by federal and state agencies and legislative bodies and securities and insurance self-regulatory organizations.  As discussed below, a few of these proposals have become effective, and others may be made or adopted.



3




On December 18, 2008, the SEC adopted Rule 151A which will require certain fixed indexed annuity sales to be registered with the SEC by January 12, 2011.  In addition, under the rule registered fixed indexed annuities will only be able to be sold by FINRA registered broker-dealers and representatives.  As a result, fixed indexed annuity sales will be subject to regulation and oversight by both the SEC and FINRA.  In response to the rule's adoption, a coalition of insurance companies and insurance marketing organizations have filed suit to block the implementation of the rule. In addition, on February 17, 2009 the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) and NCOIL (the association of state insurance regulators and a group representing state legislators) also filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that seeks to block implementation  of th e rule.  Both suits dispute the SEC's authority to adopt Rule 151A.   The industry groups argue the SEC rule violates the Securities Act of 1933 and prior Supreme Court precedents and that the SEC itself violated the Administrative Procedures Act. We cannot at this time predict whether implementation of Rule 151A will be enjoined.  If Rule 151A becomes effective as adopted in 2011, Legacy Marketing  could be adversely impacted as it would have to expand its distribution capabilities  utilizing registered broker dealers.


Also, in recent years, the U.S. insurance regulatory framework has also come under scrutiny.  Some state legislatures have considered laws that may alter or increase state regulation of insurance, reinsurance, and holding companies.  Moreover, the  NAIC and state insurance regulators regularly re-examine existing laws and regulations, often focusing on modifications to holding company regulations, interpretations of existing laws and the development of new laws.  Changes in these laws and regulations or their interpretation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  

In addition, the U.S. Congress is again considering legislation that would impose certain national uniform standards on insurance companies, establish an optional federal charter system for insurance companies and repeal the McCarran-Ferguson antitrust exemption for the business of insurance, any of which could have a significant impact on our business.  If such laws or regulations are adopted, they could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

New tax regulations have also been adopted recently that affect the treatment of tax-sheltered annuity contracts.  In addition, new accounting and actuarial proposals, including principles-based reserving, may be proposed and adopted.  These developments also could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Employees

As of March 15, 2009, we employed 71  persons.  None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement.  We consider our relations with our employees to be good, and we will continue to strive to provide a positive work environment for our employees.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY

We have experienced losses in recent years and if losses continue, our business could suffer.

We had a net loss of $110,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  The loss was primarily due to a loss at Legacy Marketing resulting from decreased revenue, excluding the gain from the sale of partnership interests of $6.5 million, and discontinued operations.  We do not know when or if we will become profitable in the foreseeable future.  If our revenue continues to decline and we continue to incur net losses in future periods, our business and results of operations could suffer.   

We depend on a limited number of sources for our products, and any interruption, deterioration, or termination of the relationship with any of our insurance carriers could be disruptive to our business and harm our results of operations and financial condition.


Legacy Marketing has marketing agreements with American National, Investors Insurance, OM Financial (Americom), and Washington National.  During 2008, 26%, 14%, 12% and 10% of our total consolidated revenue of $12.6 million, excluding the gain from the sale of partnership interest of $6.5 million, resulted from fixed annuity products Legacy Marketing marketed and sold on behalf of Investors Insurance, Washington National, American National, and OM Financial (Americom), respectively.  During 2007, 26%, 21%, 7% and 9% of our total consolidated revenue resulted from fixed annuity products Legacy Marketing marketed and sold on behalf of Washington National, American National, Investors Insurance, and OM Financial (Americom), respectively.



4




The marketing agreement with American National expires on November 15, 2009, and may be renewed by mutual agreement for successive one-year terms.  The agreement may be terminated by either party upon twelve months prior written notice without cause, and may be terminated by either party immediately for cause.  The marketing agreement with Investors Insurance expires on March 31, 2009, and will be renewed automatically for successive one-year terms unless terminated earlier by either party upon twelve months prior written notice without cause.  The marketing agreement with OM Financial (Americom) expires on June 10, 2009, and will automatically renew for successive one-year periods, unless terminated by Legacy Marketing with twelve months written notice or by OM Financial (Americom) with at least six months written notice.  Either party may terminate the agreements immediately for cause.  The marketing agr eement with Washington National expires on October 10, 2009, and may be renewed by mutual agreement for successive one-year terms, unless terminated by either party upon twelve months prior written notice without cause, and by either party immediately for cause.

Effective October 17, 2007, Legacy Marketing terminated its carrier administrative agreements and  entered into an agreement and strategic alliance with a subsidiary of Perot Systems, whereby Legacy Marketing agreed to transfer its third party administration services function and the employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems’ assumption of such administrative service functions.  Perot Systems will also become the exclusive provider of administrative services for Legacy Marketing’s future portfolio of annuity products.  In the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, Legacy Marketing received approximately $5.3 million and $7.4 million, respectively, in gross revenue under the administrative agreements with carriers.  The termination of administrative agreements does not affect the commissions earned by Legacy Marketing on additional premium received or assets under management with respect to the underlying insurance contracts.

Any interruption, deterioration, or termination of the relationship with any of Legacy Marketing’s insurance carriers could be disruptive to our business and harm our results of operations and financial condition.

If we fail to attract and retain key personnel, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be diminished.

Our success depends largely on the skills, experience and performance of certain key members of our management.  In the recent past, we have been successful in attracting and retaining key personnel.  We have no agreements with these individuals requiring them to maintain their employment with us.  If we lose one or more of these key employees, particularly Lynda L. Pitts, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, or R. Preston Pitts, President and Chief Financial Officer, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be diminished because we rely on their contacts, insurance carrier and Producer and Wholesaler relationships, and strategic direction to drive our revenues.  However, we are not aware of any key personnel who are planning to retire or leave our company in the near future.  Although we maintain and are the beneficiary of key person life insurance policies on the lives o f Lynda L. Pitts and R. Preston Pitts, we do not believe the proceeds would be adequate to compensate Regan Holding for their loss.

Competition for employees in our industry can be a concern, particularly for personnel with training and experience.  We may be unable to retain our highly skilled employees or to attract, assimilate, or retain other highly qualified employees in the future.

Our performance will depend on the growth of Legacy Marketing. If Legacy Marketing fails to grow, our financial performance could suffer.

Our growth is, and for the foreseeable future will continue to be, dependent on Legacy Marketing's ability to design and market competitive fixed annuity products and provide other products, services, and sales.  The ability of Legacy Marketing to successfully perform these services could be affected by many factors, including:

The ability of Legacy Marketing to recruit, train and retain Producers and provide them with product and sales training.

The degree of market acceptance of the products designed and marketed on behalf of our insurance carriers.



5




The relationship between Legacy Marketing and our insurance carriers and their capacity to accept new premium and maintain good financial ratings.

The failure of Legacy Marketing to comply with federal, state and other regulatory requirements applicable to the sale of insurance products.

Competition from other financial services companies in the sale of insurance products.

A large percentage of our revenue is derived from sales of fixed annuity products.  The historical crediting rates of fixed annuity products are directly affected by financial market conditions.  Changes in market or economic conditions can affect demand for these fixed annuities.  Our future success depends on our ability to introduce and market new products and services that are financially attractive and address our customers' changing demands.  We may experience difficulties that delay or prevent the successful design, development, introduction and marketing of our products and services. These delays may cause customers to forego purchases of our products and services and instead purchase those of our competitors.  The failure to be successful in our sales efforts could significantly decrease our revenue and operating results and result in weakened financial condition and prospects.

We may be unable to effectively fund our working capital requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and earnings.

If our cash inflows and existing cash balances become insufficient to support future operating requirements or the redemption of our common stock, we will need to obtain additional funding either by incurring additional debt or issuing equity to investors in either the public or private capital markets.  Our cash flows are primarily dependent upon the commissions we receive based on the premium generated from the sale of fixed annuity products that we sell.  The market for these products is extremely competitive.  New products are constantly being developed to replace existing products in the marketplace.  If we are unable to keep pace with the development of such new products, our cash inflows could decrease.  Due to this changing environment in which we operate, we are unable to predict whether our cash inflows will be sufficient to support future operating requirements.  Our failure to obtain additio nal funding when needed could delay new product introduction or business expansion opportunities, which could cause a decrease in our operating results and financial condition.  We are unaware of any material limitations on our ability to obtain additional funding.  If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the ownership percentage of our then-current shareholders would be reduced.  Furthermore, any equity securities issued in the future may have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to that of our existing common stock.

Significant repurchases of our common stock could materially decrease our cash position.

Pursuant to the terms of our Amended and Restated Shareholder's Agreement with Lynda L. Pitts, our Chief Executive Officer, upon the death of Mrs. Pitts, the heirs of Mrs. Pitts will have the option (but not the obligation) to sell to us all or a portion of the shares of Regan Holding owned by Mrs. Pitts at the time of her death.  In addition, we would also have the option (but not the obligation) to purchase from Mrs. Pitts’ estate all shares of common stock that were owned by Mrs. Pitts at the time of her death, or were transferred by her to one or more trusts prior to her death.  The purchase price to be paid by us, if any, shall be equal to 125% of the fair market value of the shares.  As of December 31, 2008, we believe 125% of the fair market value of the shares owned by Mrs. Pitts was equal to $562,000.  We have purchased life insurance coverage for the purpose of funding this potential obligation.  There can be no assurances, however, that the proceeds from this insurance coverage will be available or sufficient to cover the purchase price of the shares owned by Mrs. Pitts at the time of her death.  If the insurance proceeds were not available or sufficient to cover the purchase price of Mrs. Pitts’ shares at the time of her death, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

We may not be able to compete successfully with competitors that may have greater resources than we do.

The fixed annuity business is rapidly evolving and intensely competitive.  Legacy Marketing's primary market is fixed annuities sold through independent Producers.  Fixed annuity product sales in the United States were approximately $109 billion in 2008.  Legacy Marketing had a 0.3% share of the 2008 fixed annuity product sales in the United States based on Legacy Marketing’s inforce premiums placed in 2008. Some of Legacy Marketing's top competitors selling fixed annuities through independent sales channels are Allianz Life of North America, American Equity Investment Life, and Aviva USA.  These competitors may have greater financial and other resources than we do, which allow them to respond more quickly than us under certain circumstances.  



6



Legacy Marketing is not aware of any significant new means of competition, products or services that its competitors provide or will soon provide.  However, in the highly competitive fixed annuity marketplace, new distribution models, product innovations and technological advances may occur at any time and could present Legacy Marketing with competitive challenges.  There can be no assurance that Legacy Marketing will be able to compete successfully.  In addition, Legacy Marketing’s business model relies on its Wholesaler distribution networks to effectively market its products competitively.  Maintaining relationships with these Wholesaler distribution networks requires introducing new products and services to the market in an efficient and timely manner, offering competitive commission schedules, and providing superior marketing, product training, and support.  In the recent past, Legacy Marketing has been reasonably successful in expanding and maintaining its Wholesaler or Producer distribution network.  However, due to competition among insurance companies and insurance marketing organizations for successful Wholesalers, there can be no assurance that Legacy Marketing will be able to retain some or all of its Wholesaler distribution networks.

We may face increased governmental regulation and legal uncertainties, which could result in diminished financial performance.

During the past few years, several federal, state and insurance self-regulatory organization proposals have been made that could affect our business.  As discussed below, a few of these proposals have become effective, and others may be made or adopted.


On December 18, 2008, the SEC adopted Rule 151A which will require certain fixed indexed annuity sales to be registered with the SEC by January 12, 2011.  In addition, under the rule registered fixed indexed annuities will only be able to be sold by FINRA registered broker-dealers and representatives.  As a result, fixed indexed annuity sales will be subject to regulation and oversight by both the SEC and FINRA.  In response to the rule's adoption, a coalition of insurance companies and insurance marketing organizations have filed suit to block the implementation of the rule. In addition, on February 17, 2009 the NAIC and NCOIL (the association of state insurance regulators and a group representing state legislators) also filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that  seeks  to block implementation  of the rule.  Both suits dispute the SEC's authority to adopt&nb sp;Rule 151A.   The industry groups argue the SEC rule violates the Securities Act of 1933 and prior Supreme Court precedents and that the SEC itself violated the Administrative Procedures Act. We cannot at this time predict whether implementation of Rule 151A will be enjoined.  If Rule 151A becomes effective as adopted in 2011, we could be adversely impacted as we would have to expand our distribution capabilities into broker dealers.


Our core business consists of selling fixed annuity products, on behalf of insurance carriers, through a network of independent insurance producers (referred to as Producers). If Rule 151A becomes effective as adopted in 2011, the demand for fixed annuity products, our operations and those of our Producers could be adversely affected and could have a material adverse effect on the insurance industry in general or on our financial condition and results of operations.


Also, in recent years, the U.S. insurance regulatory framework has also come under scrutiny.  Some state legislatures have considered laws that may alter or increase state regulation of insurance, reinsurance, and holding companies.  Moreover, the NAIC and state insurance regulators regularly re-examine existing laws and regulations, often focusing on modifications to holding company regulations, interpretations of existing laws and the development of new laws.  Changes in these laws and regulations or their interpretation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  

In addition, the U.S. Congress is again considering legislation that would impose certain national uniform standards on insurance companies, establish an optional federal charter system for insurance companies and repeal the McCarran-Ferguson antitrust exemption for the business of insurance, any of which could have a significant impact on our business.  If such laws or regulations are adopted, they could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

New tax regulations have also been adopted recently that affect the treatment of tax-sheltered annuity contracts.  Also, new accounting and actuarial proposals, including principles-based reserving, may adopted.  These developments also could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse changes in tax laws could diminish the marketability of most of our products, resulting in decreased revenue.



7




Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, income tax payable by policyholders on investment earnings is deferred during the accumulation period of most of the fixed annuity products that Legacy Marketing markets.  This favorable income tax treatment results in our policyholders paying no income tax on their earnings in the fixed annuity products until they take a cash distribution.  We believe that the tax deferral features contained within the fixed annuity products that Legacy Marketing markets give our products a competitive advantage over other non-insurance investment products where income taxes may be due on current earnings.  If the tax code is revised to reduce the tax-deferred status of annuity products or to increase the tax-deferred status of competing non-insurance products, our business could be adversely impacted because our competitive advantage could be weakened. If the tax code is revised t o change existing estate tax laws, our business could be adversely affected. We cannot predict other future tax initiatives that the federal government may propose that may affect us.

We operate in an industry in which there is significant risk of litigation. Substantial claims against us could diminish our financial condition or results of operation.

As a professional services firm primarily engaged in the marketing of fixed annuity products, we encounter litigation in the normal course of business.  Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these cases, management believes, based on discussions with legal counsel, that the ultimate disposition of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.  In addition, companies in the insurance industry have been subject to substantial claims involving sales practices, agent misconduct, failure to properly supervise agents, and other matters in connection with the sale of annuities.  Increasingly, these lawsuits have resulted in the award of substantial judgments, including material amounts of punitive damages that are disproportionate to the actual damages. In some states juries have substantial discretion in awarding punitive damages t hat creates the potential for material adverse judgments in litigation.  If any similar lawsuit or other litigation is brought against us, such proceedings may materially harm our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We owned an office building in Rome, Georgia, which was used to accommodate some of Legacy Marketing’s operating activities.  We financed the property with a mortgage loan, which totaled $2.6 million at December 31, 2007.  On October 17, 2007, we entered into a lease with Perot Systems whereby Perot Systems leased our offices in Rome, Georgia, for a ten-year term at an initial rental price of $8.00 per square foot (a lease amount of approximately $300,000 per year).  On May 23, 2008, the Company sold its office building in Rome, Georgia for $3.5 million for a gain of $214,000. Net proceeds from the sale of the building were used to repay the mortgage on the property, the outstanding balance of which was $2.6 million. As a result of the sale, the lease with Perot Systems was terminated.

We currently lease an office building in Petaluma, California, which serves as the principal executive offices of Legacy Marketing.  

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.  Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these cases, we believe that the ultimate disposition of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No items were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2008.



8



PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


As of March 15, 2009, our Series A Common Stock was held by approximately 1,200 shareholders of record and our Series B Common Stock was held by approximately 2,200 shareholders of record.  There is no established public trading market for our stock.

Our Board of Directors may, at its sole discretion, declare and pay dividends on common stock, subject to capital and solvency restrictions under California law.  To date, we have not paid any dividends on our common stock.  Our ability to pay dividends is dependent on the ability of our wholly-owned subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us.  We do not anticipate paying dividends on any of our outstanding common stock in the foreseeable future.

Regan Holding Corp.’s Common Stock became subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in November 1991 as a result of the issuance of shares of Series B Stock in connection with the acquisition of LifeSurance Corporation.  There has never been an active public trading market for the Common Stock.  Prior to December 31, 1992, Regan Holding Corp issued 5,935,094 shares of Series A Redeemable Common Stock at prices ranging from $1.00 to $2.25 per share.  This stock was issued in accordance with the terms of the 701 Asset Accumulator Program (the "701 Plan") between Regan Holding Corp., its independent insurance producers and employees, and the Confidential Private Placement Memorandum and Subscription Agreement (the "Subscription Agreement") between the Regan Holding Corp. and certain accredited investors.  Under the terms of the 701 Plan and the Subscription Agreement, the Series A Redeemable Common Stock may be redeemed at the option of the holder after being held for two consecutive years, at a redemption price based upon current market value, subject to Regan Holding Corp.’s ability to make such purchases under applicable corporate law.  In connection with the merger in 1991 between Regan Holding Corp. and LifeSurance Corporation, 615,242 shares of Series B Redeemable Common Stock were authorized and issued in exchange for all of the outstanding stock of LifeSurance Corporation.  Under the merger agreement, the Series B Redeemable Common Stock may be redeemed by the holder in quantities of up to 10% per year, at a redemption price based upon current market value, provided that the redemption is in accordance with applicable corporate law.


In 1996, Regan Holding Corp. began repurchasing shares of its Series A and Series B Redeemable Common Stock (collectively referred to as “Redeemable Common Stock”) and began voluntarily repurchasing shares of its Common Stock that are not redeemable at the option of the holder ("Non-Redeemable Common Stock").  The repurchase prices of the Redeemable Common Stock and Non-Redeemable Common Stock are based on an independent appraisal of the fair market value of the shares.  The fair market value of the Non-Redeemable Common Stock is typically lower than that of the Redeemable Common Stock.  This difference in fair market values reflects the fact that Regan Holding Corp. is not obligated to repurchase the Non-Redeemable Common Stock.  The prices paid for the Redeemable and Non-Redeemable Common Stock were as follows:

  

Price Per Share

Appraisal Date

 

Redeemable

Common

Stock

Series A

 

Redeemable

Common

Stock

Series B

 

Non-Redeemable

Common

Stock

June 30, 2002

 

 $ 

2.19 

 

 $ 

2.19 

 

 $ 

1.68 

December 31, 2002

 $ 

2.20 

 

 $ 

1.82 

 

 $ 

1.69 

June 30, 2003

 

 $ 

2.22 

 

 $ 

1.83 

 

 $ 

1.70 

December 31, 2003

 $ 

2.21 

 

 $ 

1.82 

 

 $ 

1.69 

June 30, 2004

 

 $ 

2.20 

 

 $ 

1.81 

 

 $ 

1.68 

December 31, 2004

 $ 

2.03 

 

 $ 

1.67 

 

 $ 

1.55 

June 30, 2005

 

 $ 

1.09 

 

 $ 

0.90 

 

 $ 

0.84 

December 31, 2005

 $ 

0.69 

 

 $ 

0.57 

 

 $ 

0.52 

June 30, 2006

 

 $ 

0.85 

 

 $ 

0.70 

 

 $ 

0.65 

December 31, 2006

 $ 

0.06 

 

 $ 

0.05 

 

 $ 

0.05 


There were no stock repurchases in 2008 and 2007. The Company is currently unable to redeem its redeemable common stock due to restrictions in California corporation law.



9




Item 6. Selected Financial Data

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Selected Income Statement Data:

                

Total revenue

 

19,140,000 

 

19,867,000 

 

25,845,000 

 

24,857,000 

 

34,009,000 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

488,000 

 

(9,349,000)

 

(4,658,000)

 

(11,248,000)

 

(5,908,000)

 
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

                

per share - basic:

 

0.02 

 

(0.39)

 

(0.19)

 

(0.46)

 

(0.25)

 
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

                

per share - diluted:

 

0.02 

 

(0.39)

 

(0.19)

 

(0.46)

 

(0.25)

 
                 

Selected Balance Sheet Data:

                

Total assets

 

5,046,000 

 

20,463,000 

 

27,694,000 

 

30,400,000 

 

47,618,000 

 

Total non current liabilities

 

7,394,000 

 

18,090,000 

 

18,745,000 

 

13,540,000 

 

19,548,000 

 

Redeemable common stock

 

5,897,000 

 

5,897,000 

 

5,897,000 

 

6,219,000 

 

7,486,000 

 

Cash dividends declared

  

  

  

  

  

 

Selected Operating Data:

                

Total fixed premium placed inforce (1)

 

374 million 

 

410 million 

 

508 million 

 

480 million 

 

800 million 

 




(1)

When a policyholder remits a premium payment with an accurate and completed application for an insurance policy, the policy is placed inforce.  Inforce premium and policies are statistics of our carriers but are factors that directly affect our revenue.



10



Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes included herein.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this document, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that are not historical facts, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results or performance of Regan Holding and its businesses to be materially different from that expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  These risks, uncertainties and factors include, among other things, the following: general market conditions and the changing interest rate environment; the interruption, deterioration, or termination of our relationships with the insurance carriers who provide our products or the agents who market and sell them; the ability to develop and market new products to keep up with the evolving industry in which we operate; increased governmental regulation, especially regulations affecting insurance, reinsurance, and holding companies; the ability to attract and retain talented and productive personnel; the ability to effectively fund our working capital requirements; the risk of substantial litigation or insurance claims; and other factors referred to under Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Regan Holding Corp. assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in or additions to the factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

General Overview of Our Business

Regan Holding is a holding company whose primary operating subsidiary is Legacy Marketing.  

Legacy Marketing designs and markets fixed annuity products on behalf of certain unaffiliated insurance carriers in each of the United States, except Alabama and New York.  As of December 31, 2008, Legacy Marketing had marketing agreements with American National, Investors Insurance, OM Financial (Americom), and Washington National.  The marketing agreements grant Legacy Marketing the exclusive right to market certain fixed annuity products issued by these insurance carriers.  Legacy Marketing is responsible for recruiting agents, who have contracted with Legacy Marketing to sell these products, and are appointed with the applicable insurance carrier.  For these services, the insurance carriers pay Legacy Marketing commissions and marketing allowances.

Legacy Marketing also had administrative agreements with each of the insurance carriers listed above.  Effective October 17, 2007, Legacy Marketing entered into an agreement with a subsidiary of Perot Systems, whereby Legacy Marketing agreed to transfer its third party administration services function and certain employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems’ assumption of such administrative service functions.  As a result of this transaction, Legacy Marketing recognized a non-cash internal use software impairment charge of approximately $1.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.

On March 26, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to exchange its asset based trailing commissions (“trail commissions”) with Legacy TM for a limited partnership interest in Legacy TM (the “Partnership”). Subsequently, the company sold a portion of its limited partnership interest – Class B interest – for $6.5 million in cash and retained an interest in the limited partnership – Class A interest. The transaction closed on March 26, 2008. The Class A limited partnership interest in the Partnership, retained by Legacy Marketing, includes the beneficial interest in 33 1/3% of the trail commission revenue received on those policies in effect on or prior to the closing date for the one year period subsequent to the closing date and all revenue associated with policies that become effective after the closing date. The Company’s limited partnership interest is unencumbered. Lynda Pitts, Chief Executive Officer, and R. Preston P itts, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each of whom is also a director of the Company, are the general partners of the Partnership and together own all of the Class B interests in the Partnership.


A special committee of the Board of Directors of the Company comprising the independent directors, Ute Scott-Smith, J. Daniel Speight, Jr. and Donald Ratajczak, approved the amount of consideration. In connection with the committee’s deliberations the Company obtained a fairness opinion from an independent third party stating that the total value of the transaction to the Company was within an acceptable range of estimated fair values of the future trail commission cash flows. A portion of the proceeds was used to pay the $6 million note payable, to Washington National Insurance Company and interest accrued thereon. The remainder of the proceeds is available for general corporate purposes.



11




On May 31, 2007, Regan Holding Corp. and two of its subsidiaries, Legacy Financial Services Inc. (“Legacy Financial”) and Legacy Advisory Services Inc., entered into an agreement with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation whereby Legacy Financial Services transferred its registered representatives and customer accounts to Multi-Financial Securities Corporation.  Under the agreement, on September 28, 2007, Multi-Financial Securities Corporation paid Legacy Financial Services $1 million (11.5%) of the aggregate gross dealer concessions earned at Legacy Financial Services between May 1, 2006, and April 30, 2007, by those transferred representatives who were, as of the measurement date (as defined in the agreement), registered with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation and in good standing with the FINRA.  In addition, on each of the first four anniversary dates of the measurement date, subject to certain condition s, Multi-Financial Securities Corporation is obligated to pay Legacy Financial Services an amount representing up to four and a half percent (4.5%) of each transferred representative’s aggregate gross dealer concessions earned with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation during the one year period prior to such anniversary date. As of December 31, 2008, Legacy Financial did not meet the specified terms in order to receive a second payment from Multi-Financial Securities Corporation and does not expect to receive any payments related to this agreement in the future.

On January 25, 2007, prospectdigital LLC ("prospectdigital"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Regan Holding, sold certain of its assets, which primarily included fixed assets and other miscellaneous operating assets, to PD Holdings LLC ("PD Holdings").  In addition, PD Holdings agreed to assume certain liabilities of prospectdigital.  The action was taken in a continuing effort to reduce Regan Holding’s operating expenses, as prospectdigital continued to sustain losses through the date of sale.

Lynda Pitts, Chief Executive Officer, and R. Preston Pitts, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Regan Holding, are the primary owners of PD Holdings.  In connection with the sale, we also entered into a service agreement with PD Holdings whereby subsidiaries of Regan Holding will provide certain administrative services to PD Holdings for a fee equal to the cost of the services provided.

Prospectdigital received $116,000 in consideration of the sale, which was greater than the estimated fair value of the assets of prospectdigital being sold, as determined by a third-party independent valuation.  The amount of consideration was approved by the Board of Directors of Regan Holding.

On July 20, 2006, Legacy Marketing entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Washington National Insurance Company (the “Lender”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Lender made a non-revolving multiple advance term loan (the “Term Loan”) to Legacy Marketing totaling $6.0 million.  On April 12, 2007, Legacy Marketing amended certain terms of the Agreement through the execution of Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement as so amended, the “Amended Agreement”) and (1) extended the final maturity of the loan under the Credit Agreement from April 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012; (2) changed certain of the requirements for mandatory prepayments under the Credit Agreement; (3) changed certain terms of the financial covenants specified in the Credit Agreement; and (4) revised certain definitions contained in the Credi t Agreement. On March 28, 2008, the balance due of $6.0 million, plus accrued interest, on the Credit Agreement was repaid.7

On November 18, 2005, Regan Holding sold its office buildings in Petaluma, California for $12.8 million.  Regan Holding and the third party buyer (the “Buyer”) further agreed to enter into a ten year lease agreement, concurrently with the sale of the buildings, whereby it leased back 71,612 square feet through March 14, 2007, and will continue to lease back 47,612 square feet for the remainder of the lease term.  The monthly base rent was $1.33 per square foot in 2008 and $1.29 per square foot in 2007 and will increase annually by three percent during the term of the lease, in addition to monthly taxes and operating expenses.  

The results of our operations are generally affected by the conditions that affect other companies that market fixed annuity and life insurance products.  These conditions are increased competition, changes in the regulatory and legislative environments, and changes in general economic and investment conditions.

Recent Industry Developments

During the past few years, several proposals relating to our business have been made by federal and state agencies and legislative bodies and securities and insurance self-regulatory organizations.  As discussed below, a few of these proposals have become effective, and others may be made or adopted.

In recent years, the SEC has been examining whether all equity-indexed annuities need to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933.  Additionally, FINRA has issued guidance to its members indicating that broker-dealers regulated by the FINRA have certain responsibilities with respect to the offer and sale of equity-indexed annuities, including an obligation to determine the suitability of such products for their customers, regardless of whether equity-indexed annuities are deemed to be securities.  Finally, some state insurance regulators are considering whether additional suitability and disclosure regulations should be implemented with respect to all sales of fixed annuities, particularly with respect to senior citizens.  



12




On December 18, 2008, the SEC adopted Rule 151A which will require certain fixed indexed annuity sales to be registered with the SEC by January 12, 2011.  In addition, under the rule registered fixed indexed annuities will only be able to be sold by FINRA registered broker-dealers and representatives.  As a result, fixed indexed annuity sales will be subject to regulation and oversight by both the SEC and FINRA.  In response to the rule's adoption, a coalition of insurance companies and insurance marketing organizations have filed suit to block the implementation of the rule. In addition, on February 17, 2009 the NAIC and NCOIL (the association of state insurance regulators and a group representing state legislators) also filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that  seeks  to block implementation  of the rule.  Both suits dispute the SEC's authority to adopt&nb sp;Rule 151A.   The industry groups argue the SEC rule violates the Securities Act of 1933 and prior Supreme Court precedents and that the SEC itself violated the Administrative Procedures Act. We cannot at this time predict whether implementation of Rule 151A will be enjoined.  If Rule 151A becomes effective as adopted in 2011, the company could be adversely impacted as it would have to expand its distribution capabilities into broker dealers.


Our core business consists of selling fixed annuity products, on behalf of insurance carriers, through a network of independent insurance producers (known as Producers). If Rule 151A becomes effective as adopted in 2011, the demand for fixed annuity products, our operations and those of our Producers could be adversely affected and could have a material adverse effect on the insurance industry in general or on our financial condition and results of operations.


Also, in recent years, the U.S. insurance regulatory framework has come under scrutiny.  Some state legislatures have considered laws that may alter or increase state regulation of insurance, reinsurance, and holding companies.  Moreover, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and state insurance regulators regularly re-examine existing laws and regulations, often focusing on modifications to holding company regulations, interpretations of existing laws and the development of new laws.  Changes in these laws and regulations or their interpretation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  

In addition, the U.S. Congress is again considering legislation that would impose certain national uniform standards on insurance companies, establish an optional federal charter system for insurance companies and repeal the McCarran-Ferguson antitrust exemption for the business of insurance, any of which could have a significant impact on our business.  If such laws or regulations are adopted, they could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

New tax regulations have also been adopted recently that affect the treatment of tax-sheltered annuity contracts.  In addition, new accounting and actuarial proposals, including principles-based reserving, may be adopted.  These developments also could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Legacy Financial, a discontinued operation, was registered as a broker-dealer with, and was subject to regulation by, the SEC, FINRA, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, and various state agencies.  This regulation covers matters such as capital requirements, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and employee-related matters, including qualification and licensing of supervisory and sales personnel.  Any proceeding alleging violation of, or noncompliance with, laws and regulations applicable to Legacy Financial could harm its business and financial condition, and our results of discontinued operations. As of September 29, 2008, Legacy Financial withdrew as a broker-dealer with FINRA.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based on our consolidated financial statements and related notes, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Legacy Marketing has marketing agreements with certain insurance carriers.  Under the terms of the marketing agreements, Legacy Marketing is responsible for recruiting Producers, who have contracted with Legacy Marketing to sell fixed annuity products, and are appointed with various states’ departments of insurance and the applicable insurance carriers.  For these services, the insurance carriers pay Legacy Marketing commissions and marketing allowances.

There are no significant management judgments associated with reporting our revenues. When a policyholder remits a premium payment to that insurance carrier with an accurate and completed application for an insurance policy, the policy is considered inforce and Legacy Marketing recognizes marketing allowances and commission income.  Legacy Marketing’s carriers grant policyholders a contractual right to terminate the insurance contract ten to thirty days after a policy is placed inforce.  This return period varies depending on the carrier, the type of policy and the jurisdiction in which the policy is sold.  Legacy Marketing gathers historical product return data that does not vary significantly from quarter to quarter, and has historically been predictive of future events.  Returns are estimated using this data and have been reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements.  



13




The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, trading investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes payable are based on their respective fair market values in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157 and SFAS No.133. 1

We capitalize external consulting fees, and salaries and benefits for employees who are directly associated with the development of software for internal use, when both of the following occur:

The preliminary project stage is completed and the project is therefore in the application development stage; and

Management authorizes and commits to funding a software project and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function desired.

Modifications or enhancements made to an existing software product that result in additional functionality are also capitalized.  When the new software is placed in production, we begin amortizing the asset over its estimated useful life.  Training and maintenance costs are accounted for as expenses as they occur.  We periodically review capitalized internal use software to determine if the carrying value is fully recoverable.  If there are future cash flows directly related to the software we record an impairment loss when the present value of the future cash flows is less than the carrying value.  If software, or components of software, in development are abandoned, the Company takes a charge to write off the capitalized amount in the period the decision is made to abandon it.

We review our other long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable.  We periodically review capitalized internal use software to determine if the carrying value is fully recoverable.  Recoverability is measured by a comparison of the assets’ carrying amount to their expected future undiscounted cash flows. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the present value of future discounted cash flows.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of deferred tax assets will, or will not, be realized.  The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible.  Management believes it is more likely than not that any deferred tax assets after valuation allowance will be realized.

The Company has adopted SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments,” which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions whereby an entity receives employee services in exchange for equity instruments, including stock options. Under this method, the Company records stock-based compensation expense for all new stock options that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered.  The Company issues new shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.

On a continuous basis, the Company evaluates all recent accounting pronouncements and discloses the impact that the implementation of such pronouncements will have on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2008 compared with year ended December 31, 2007

Our revenue decreased $727,000 (4%) in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to decreased marketing allowances and commissions of $1.1 million, administrative fees of $5.3 million, and trailing commissions of $1.7 million; partially offset by an increase in other revenue of  $1 million and the sale of limited partnership interests of $6.5 million.  Marketing allowances and commissions decreased $1.1 million (12%) primarily due to an overall decrease in the sales of fixed annuity products and lower marketing allowance rates on some of the products.  

Administrative fees decreased $5.3 million (100%) in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to the termination of administrative agreements with Washington National, American National, Investors Insurance, and OM Financial (Americom) effective October 17, 2007, as the result of an agreement with a subsidiary of Perot Systems, whereby we agreed to transfer our third party administration services function and certain employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems assumption of such administrative service functions.  As a result of this transaction, Legacy Marketing recognized a non-cash internal use software impairment charge of approximately $1.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.  

Trailing commissions decreased $1.7 million (56%) primarily due to the result of a decline in inforce policies and the exchange of trail commission rights for limited partnership interests. The limited partnership interest representing the Class B shares was subsequently sold for $6.5 million in March 2008.



14




Other revenue increased $1 million (31%)  primarily due. to payments received from Perot for the transitioned and retained employee salaries and benefits, certain software and hardware costs, and other occupancy and equipment costs.

The remaining increase of $6.5 million in revenue was due to the gain on the sale of the Limited Partnership Class B shares in Legacy TM, LP.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, Legacy Marketing marketed and sold products primarily on behalf of four unaffiliated insurance carriers:  Investors Insurance, Washington National, American National, and OM Financial (Americom).  As indicated below, the agreements with these carriers generated a significant portion of our total consolidated revenue of $12.6 million, which excludes the gain on the sale of partnership interests of $6.5 million:


 

2008

 

2007

Investors Insurance

26%

 

7%

Washington National

14%

 

26%

American National

12%

 

21%

OM Financial (Americom)

10%

 

9%



Our consolidated revenues were derived primarily from sales and marketing of the following fixed annuity products:

  

2008

 

2007

PremierMark (SM) series (sold on behalf of Investors Insurance)

 

22%

 

5%

RewardMark (SM) series (sold on behalf of Washington National)

 

14%

 

26%

BenchMark (SM) series (sold on behalf of American National)

 

11%

 

19%

AmeriMark Freedom (SM) series (sold on behalf of OM Financial (Americom))

 

10%

 

9%


Legacy Marketing’s operating expenses decreased  $10.4 million (36%) in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to decreased selling, general and administrative expenses, other miscellaneous expenses, and deferred compensation, partially offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses as a result of the acceleration of the estimated useful life of internal use software.   Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $9.4 million (41%) primarily due to reduced compensation and benefits, occupancy expense, and professional fees.  Compensation and benefits decreased primarily due to decreased employee headcount resulting from the transfer of administrative services to the Perot subsidiary. Occupancy expenses decreased primarily due to a reduction in mortgage expense as a result of the sale of our Rome, Georgia facility in May 2008. Professional fees decreased primarily due to lower consult ing and legal services.

Other miscellaneous expenses decreased in 2008, as 2007 included a $1.2 million impairment charge for internal use software. In addition, there was a decrease in equipment leasing and maintenance expense in 2008 primarily due to the renegotiation of contracts and reduction of office equipment.

Deferred compensation expense decreased in 2008 primarily due to a decline in market value of the deferred compensation liabilities.

Income tax provision increased $117,000 in 2008 primarily due to California’s suspension of using net operating loss carryforwards for tax year 2008.

Year ended December 31, 2007 compared with year ended December 31, 2006

Our revenue decreased $5.9 million (23%) in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to decreased marketing allowances and commissions of $4.9 million and administrative fees of $2.1 million, partially offset by an increase in other revenue of $1.5 million.  Marketing allowances and commissions decreased $4.9 million (36%) primarily due to an overall decrease in the sales of fixed annuity products and lower marketing allowance rates on some of the products.  

Administrative fees decreased $2.1 million (28%) in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to the termination of administrative agreements with Washington National, American National, Investors Insurance, Americom and Transamerica effective October 17, 2007, as the result of an agreement with a subsidiary of Perot Systems, whereby we agreed to transfer our third party administration services function and the employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems assumption of such administrative service functions.  As a result of this transaction, Legacy Marketing recognized a non-cash internal use software impairment charge of approximately $1.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.   



15




Other revenue increased $1.5 million (86%) primarily due to payments from Perot for the transitioned and retained employee salaries and benefits, certain software and hardware costs, and other occupancy and equipment costs.

Legacy Marketing’s operating expenses decreased $4.6 million (14%) in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to decreased selling, general and administrative expenses, partially offset by a $1.2 million impairment charge for internal use software.  Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $5.5 million (19%) primarily due to reduced compensation and benefits and lower sales promotion and support costs.  Compensation and benefits decreased primarily due to decreased employee headcount, and sales promotion and support decreased in 2007 primarily as the result of reduced sales incentive costs as a function of overall sales.  Legacy Marketing has established a valuation allowance related primarily to its federal and state deferred tax assets, which increased $2.2 million in 2007.

Discontinued Segments

On May 31, 2007, Regan Holding and two of its subsidiaries, Legacy Financial and Legacy Advisory Services Inc., entered into an agreement with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation whereby Legacy Financial Services transferred its registered representatives and customer accounts to Multi-Financial Securities Corporation.  Under the agreement, on September 28, 2007, Multi-Financial Securities Corporation paid Legacy Financial Services $1 million (11.5%) of the aggregate gross dealer concessions earned at Legacy Financial Services between May 1, 2006, and April 30, 2007, by those transferred representatives who were, as of the measurement date (as defined in the agreement), registered with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation and in good standing with the FINRA.  In addition, on each of the first four anniversary dates of the measurement date, subject to certain conditions, Multi-Financial Securities Corporation is obliga ted to pay Legacy Financial Services an amount representing up to four and a half percent (4.5%) of each transferred representative’s aggregate gross dealer concessions earned with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation during the one year period prior to such anniversary date. As of December 31, 2008, Legacy Financial did not meet the specified terms in order to receive a second payment from Multi-Financial Securities Corporation and does not expect to receive any payments related to this agreement in the future.

We recognized a $1 million gain on the transfer of Legacy Financial’s registered representatives and customer accounts to Multi-Financial Securities Corporation in 2007, and as a result Legacy Financial had net income of $133,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.  Legacy Financial incurred losses of $660,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.  Legacy Financial’s results are being reported as discontinued operations.  On our consolidated balance sheet, Legacy Financial’s assets consist of $294,000 in prepaid expenses as of December 31, 2008 and $282,000 in prepaid expenses and $98,000 in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2007. Legacy Financial’s liabilities consist of  $291,000 in accrued liabilities and $75,000 in accounts payable as of December 31, 2008 and $115,000 in accrued liabilities, $55,000 in commissions payable, and $40,000 in accounts payable as of Dece mber 31, 2007.

On January 25, 2007, prospectdigital LLC ("prospectdigital"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Regan Holding Corp., sold certain of its assets, which primarily included fixed assets and other miscellaneous operating assets, to PD Holdings LLC ("PD Holdings").  In addition, PD Holdings agreed to assume certain liabilities of prospectdigital.  The action was taken in a continuing effort to reduce our operating expenses, as prospectdigital continued to sustain losses through the date of sale.

Lynda Pitts, Chief Executive Officer, and R. Preston Pitts, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Regan Holding Corp., are the primary owners of PD Holdings.  In connection with the sale, also entered into a service agreement with PD Holdings, pursuant to which subsidiaries of Regan Holding Corp. provided certain administrative services to PD Holdings, for a fee equal to the cost of the services provided.

Prospectdigital received $116,000 in consideration of the sale, which was greater than the estimated fair value of the assets of prospectdigital being sold, as determined by a third-party independent valuation.  The amount of consideration was approved by the Board of Directors of Regan Holding Corp.

Prospectdigital is being reported as a discontinued operation for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. On our consolidated balance sheet, prospectdigital’s assets consist of $28,000 in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2008 and $61,000 in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2007. Prospectdigital’s liabilities consist of $32,000 in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2008 and $139,000 in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2007. We incurred an $189,000 loss on the sale of prospectdigital’s assets in 2007.

In January 2006, we decided to discontinue the operations of Values Financial Network (“VFN”).  We incurred insignificant costs in connection with exiting the operations of VFN.  



16



Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash provided by or used in operating activities generally follows the trend in our revenue and operating results.  Our cash provided by (used in) operating activities was $8.8 million, ($6.2 million), and ($4.5 million) in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  Our cash provided by operating activities in 2008 was primarily the result of proceeds from and on the sale of trading securities and non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization and capital losses, partially offset by our net loss and a decrease in the deferred compensation payable.

Our cash used in operating activities in 2007 was primarily the result of our net loss and a decrease in the accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of trading securities and non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization and losses on write-off of fixed assets.  

Our cash used in operating activities during 2006 was primarily the result of our net loss, gains on trading securities and a non-cash decrease in income taxes payable resulting from a settlement of prior years’ tax matters.  These decreases in cash were partially offset by such non-cash items as depreciation, sales of trading securities and a decrease in prepaid expenses.  

Net cash provided by investing activities of $3.8 million in 2008 consisted primarily of proceeds from the sale of fixed assets and a decrease in temporarily restricted cash.

Net cash used in investing activities of $396,000 in 2007 consisted primarily of purchases of fixed assets and an increase in temporarily restricted cash, partially offset by proceeds from the transfer of Legacy Financial Services representatives and by proceeds from the sale of prospectdigital’s assets.

Net cash used in investing activities of $2.3 million in 2006 consisted primarily of purchases of fixed assets.

Net cash used in financing activities of $12.2 million in 2008 consisted primarily of the repayment of the Washington National loan and the mortgage loan of our Rome, Georgia facility, partially offset by proceeds from a line of credit loan.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $3.8 million in 2007 consisted primarily of proceeds from loans received from our investment broker.  

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2006 of $5.8 million consisted primarily of loan proceeds of $6.0 million resulting from our credit agreement with Washington National.  

In April 2004, we completed construction of our office building in Rome, Georgia, financing it with a $2.9 million note.  The outstanding balance of the note as of December 31, 2007, was $2.6 million. On May 23, 2008, the Company sold its office building in Rome, Georgia to Freehold Capital Advisors Ltd. for $3.5 million for a gain of $214,000. Net proceeds from the sale of the building were used to repay the mortgage on the property, the outstanding balance of which was $2.6 million.


We lease office and warehouse premises and certain office equipment under non-cancelable operating and capital leases.  As of December 31, 2008, our total contractual cash obligations, including the line of credit loan discussed above, were as follows:

 

Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

Total

 

Less than

1 year

 

1 - 3

years

 

3 - 5

years

 

After

5 years

Debt

 $ 

230,000 

 

 $ 

230,000 

 

 $ 

 

 $ 

 

 $ 

Operating and Capital Leases

 

6,571,000 

  

1,118,000 

  

2,792,000 

  

2,661,000 

  

Total Contractual Cash Obligations

 $ 

6,801,000 

 

 $ 

1,348,000 

 

 $ 

2,792,000 

 

 $ 

2,661,000 

 

 $ 


Pursuant to the terms of our Amended and Restated Shareholder's Agreement with Lynda L. Pitts, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of our Board of Directors, upon the death of Mrs. Pitts, we would have the option (but not the obligation) to purchase from Mrs. Pitts’ estate all shares of common stock that were owned by Mrs. Pitts at the time of her death, or were transferred by her to one or more trusts prior to her death.  In addition, upon the death of Mrs. Pitts, her heirs would have the option (but not the obligation) to sell their inherited shares to us.  The purchase price to be paid by us shall be equal to 125% of the fair market value of the shares.  As of December 31, 2008, we believe that 125% of the fair market value of the shares owned by Mrs. Pitts was equal to $562,000.  We have purchased life insurance coverage for the purpose of funding this potential obligation upon Mrs. Pitts’ death.



17




$8.8 million of cash was provided by operations in 2008. We used $6.2 million and $4.5 million of cash in operations in 2007 and 2006. We also incurred consolidated net losses of$110,000, $9.1 million and $6.3 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.  If our consolidated net losses continue, a cash shortfall could occur.  To address this issue, during 2007 and 2008, we lowered our cost structure by reducing our employee headcount, by repayment of debt, and by reducing the amount of office equipment leases.  In March 2008, we repaid the Washington National loan using the proceeds from the sale of partnership interests in Legacy TM, LP. In May 2008, we sold our facility in Rome, Georgia and used a portion of the proceeds to repay the mortgage loan. In October 2008, we liquidated a portion of our investment portfolio to repay the margin loans obtained from our investment broker. All of these actions eliminated appr oximately $1.6 million of annual cash use for interest and principal payments in 2008.

Starting in 2008, we have also benefited from an increase in the aggregate amount of fixed annuity sales, which we believe is due to the dramatic drop in the equity markets that began last year. The combination of increased sales and reduced costs has resulted in improved cash flows. Although, this may or may not be sustainable, it had a positive impact on the initial operating results for 2009.

In January 2007, we exited the prospectdigital business and disposed of its assets.  This action eliminated approximately $1.2 million of annual cash use.  We have completed the sale of Legacy Financial’s registered representatives and customer accounts, and we received $1 million of cash proceeds from that sale on September 28, 2007.  We used the cash proceeds from this sale to settle outstanding Legacy Financial matters.

On October 17, 2007, we entered into an agreement and strategic alliance with a subsidiary of Perot Systems Corporation, whereby we agreed to transfer our third party administration services function and the employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems’ assumption of such administrative service functions.    These initiatives have allowed us to lower our costs and increase efficiencies and to focus on higher value added activities.  

On May 23, 2008, the Company sold its office building in Rome, Georgia to Freehold Capital Advisors Ltd. for $3.5 million for a gain of $214,000. Net proceeds from the sale of the building were used to repay the mortgage on the property, the outstanding balance of which was $2.6 million.


On March 26, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to exchange its asset based trailing commissions (“trail commissions”) to Legacy TM for a limited partnership interest in Legacy TM (the “Partnership”). Subsequently, the company sold a portion of its limited partnership interest – Class B interest – for $6.5 million in cash and retained an interest in the limited partnership – Class A interest. The transaction closed on March 26, 2008. The Class A limited partnership interest in the Partnership, retained by Legacy Marketing, includes the beneficial interest in 33 1/3% of the trail commission revenue received on those policies in effect on or prior to the closing date for the one year period subsequent to the closing date and all revenue associated with policies that become effective after the closing date. The Company’s limited partnership interest is unencumbered. Lynda Pitts, Chief Executive Officer, and R. Preston Pit ts, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each of whom is also a director of the Company, are the general partners of the Partnership and together own all of the Class B interests in the Partnership.


A special committee of the Board of Directors of the Company comprising the independent directors, Ute Scott-Smith, J. Daniel Speight, Jr. and Donald Ratajczak, approved the amount of consideration. In connection with the committee’s deliberations the Company obtained a fairness opinion from an independent third party stating that the total value of the transaction to the Company was within an acceptable range of estimated fair values of the future trail commission cash flows. A portion of the proceeds was used to pay the $6 million note payable to Washington National Insurance Company and interest accrued thereon. The remainder of the proceeds is available for general corporate purposes.


In the event that a cash shortfall does occur, we believe that adequate financing could be obtained to meet our cash flow needs.  However, there can be no assurances that such financing would be available on favorable terms.  



18




Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (the “FSP”). The FSP amends SFAS No. 157 to delay the effective date of Statement 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually). For items within its scope, the FSP defers t he effective date of Statement 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 and it did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition.


In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008 and it did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. The Company  expects this pronouncement to have a significant impact on future acquisitions.


In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. This Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The statement amends SFAS No. 133 to enhance the disclosure requirement of derivative and hedging activities by providing adequate information on how such activities impact an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flow. This is intended to improve the transparency of financial reporting related to derivative and hedging activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. Adoption of SFAS No. 161 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Adoption of SFAS No. 162 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts, an interpretation of SFAS No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. The statement helps resolve diversity resulting in inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities because of differing views about when a loss has been incurred. In addition, the Statement clarifies the financial reporting requirements under SFAS No. 60 of financial guarantee insurance contracts for better comparability. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008. Adoption of SFAS No. 163 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.



19




In April 2008, the FASB Staff Position (FSP) issued FAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets to amend the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No 141, Business Combinations, and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption prohibited. Adoption of FAS No. 142-3 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operation s and financial condition.


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our investments are categorized as trading securities.

We did not have any investments in fixed income instruments as of December 31, 2008.

Equity price risk is the potential loss arising from changes in the value of equity securities. In general, equity securities have more year-to-year price variability than intermediate term high-grade bonds.  However, returns over longer time frames have been consistently higher.  Our equity securities consist primarily of investments in broadly diversified mutual funds.  As a result of unfavorable market conditions related to our mutual fund investments, the fair value of our equity securities significantly declined in the last quarter of 2008. In reaction, on October 9, 2008, the Company had to liquidate its investment portfolio for $5.4 million in order to repay $4.3 million in outstanding loans from its investment broker. The remaining cash was placed into a money market fund. We will continue to evaluate market conditions to determine when it is prudent to reinvest in equity securities.

Shown below is the fair value of our investments at the end of 2008 and the original cost and fair value of our marketable equity trading securities at the end of 2007:

  

Original Cost

 

Fair Value

December 31, 2008

 

 $ 

641,000 

 

 $ 

641,000 

December 31, 2007

 

 $ 

6,363,000 

 

 $ 

7,625,000 


The above risk is monitored on an ongoing basis.  A combination of in-house review and consultation with our investment broker is used to analyze individual securities, as well as the entire portfolio.

In addition, the Company is subject to the effect of market fluctuations upon its deferred compensation liability. This could adversely impact our operating results and the financial condition of the Company.

On May 23, 2008, the Company sold its office building in Rome, Georgia for $3.5 million for a gain of $214,000. Net proceeds from the sale of the building were used to repay the mortgage on the property, the outstanding balance of which was $2.6 million.



20



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Regan Holding Corp.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Regan Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008.  Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.  These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor have we been engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Regan Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, when considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.


/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer, LLP

San Francisco, California

March 30, 2009





21



REGAN HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheet

   

December 31,

   

2008

 

2007

Assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 $ 

628,000 

 

 $ 

152,000 

Temporarily restricted cash

  

  

656,000 

Trading investments

  

641,000 

  

7,625,000 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $0 and $167,000 at

      
 

December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively

  

447,000 

  

1,009,000 

Notes receivable, net of allowance of $20,000 and $206,000 at

      
 

December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively

  

175,000 

  

491,000 

Prepaid expenses and deposits

  

146,000 

  

293,000 

Current assets from discontinued operations

  

322,000 

  

441,000 

 

Total current assets

  

2,359,000 

  

10,667,000 

Net fixed assets

  

1,655,000 

  

8,543,000 

Building lease deposit

  

1,000,000 

  

1,000,000 

Other assets

  

32,000 

  

253,000 

 

Total non-current assets

  

2,687,000 

  

9,796,000 

 

Total assets

 

 $ 

5,046,000 

 

 $ 

20,463,000 

        

Liabilities, redeemable common stock, and shareholders' deficit

      

Liabilities

      

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 $ 

3,808,000 

 

 $ 

4,076,000 

Current portion of capital lease liabilities

  

69,000 

  

Current portion of notes payable and other borrowings

  

230,000 

  

4,691,000 

Current liabilities from discontinued operations

  

398,000 

  

349,000 

 

Total current liabilities

  

4,505,000 

  

9,116,000 

Deferred compensation payable

  

5,314,000 

  

7,919,000 

Deferred gain on sale of building

  

1,882,000 

  

2,158,000 

Other liabilities

  

134,000 

  

189,000 

Capital lease liabilities

  

64,000 

  

Notes payable, less current portion

  

  

7,824,000 

 

Total non-current liabilities

  

7,394,000 

  

18,090,000 

 

Total liabilities

  

11,899,000 

  

27,206,000 

        

Redeemable common stock, Series A and B

  

5,897,000 

  

5,897,000 

        

Shareholders' deficit

      

Preferred stock, no par value:

      

Authorized:  100,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding

  

  

Series A common stock, no par value:

      

Authorized:  45,000,000 shares; issued or outstanding: 20,959,000

      

shares at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively

  

3,921,000 

  

3,921,000 

Paid-in capital

  

6,650,000 

  

6,650,000 

Accumulated deficit

  

(23,321,000)

  

(23,211,000)

 

Total shareholders' deficit

  

(12,750,000)

  

(12,640,000)

 

Total liabilities, redeemable common stock, and shareholders' deficit

 

 $ 

5,046,000 

 

 $ 

20,463,000 

        



See notes to financial statements.

22



REGAN HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statement of Operations

     

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
     

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Revenue

           
 

Marketing allowances and commission overrides

  

7,676,000 

 

8,726,000 

 

13,590,000 

 
 

Trailing commissions

   

1,378,000 

  

3,106,000 

  

3,540,000 

 
 

Administrative fees

   

  

5,292,000 

  

7,380,000 

 
 

Sale of Legacy TM, LP Class B interest

   

6,500,000 

  

  

 
 

Other revenue

   

3,586,000 

  

2,743,000 

  

1,335,000 

 
  

Total revenue

   

19,140,000 

  

19,867,000 

  

25,845,000 

 
              

Expenses

           
 

Selling, general and administrative

   

13,543,000 

  

22,928,000 

  

28,246,000 

 
 

Depreciation and amortization

   

3,852,000 

  

3,106,000 

  

3,388,000 

 
 

Internal use software impairment loss

   

152,000 

  

1,256,000 

  

 
 

Other

   

789,000 

  

1,434,000 

  

1,684,000 

 
  

Total expenses

   

18,336,000 

  

28,724,000 

  

33,318,000 

 
              

Operating income (loss)

   

804,000 

  

(8,857,000)

  

(7,473,000)

 
              

Other income

           
 

Investment income, net

   

377,000 

  

263,000 

  

287,000 

 
 

Interest expense

   

(480,000)

  

(750,000)

  

(170,000)

 
  

Total other (expense) income, net

   

(103,000)

  

(487,000)

  

117,000 

 
              

Income (loss) before income taxes

   

701,000 

  

(9,344,000)

  

(7,356,000)

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

   

213,000 

  

5,000

  

(2,698,000)

 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   

488,000 

  

(9,349,000)

  

(4,658,000)

 
              

Discontinued operations

           
 

Income (loss) from operation of discontinued segments Values

          
  

Financial Network, Inc., Legacy Financial Services

           
  

and prospectdigital

   

(695,000)

  

299,000 

  

(1,587,000)

 
 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

   

(97,000)

  

5,000 

  

5,000 

 
              

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

   

(598,000)

  

294,000

  

(1,592,000)

 
              

Net loss before reduction of redeemable

           
 

common stock

   

(110,000)

  

(9,055,000)

  

(6,250,000)

 
 

Reduction of redeemable common stock

   

  

  

165,000 

 

Net loss available for common shareholders

  

(110,000)

 

(9,055,000)

 

(6,085,000)

 
              

Basic and diluted loss per share:

           
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  

0.02 

 

(0.39)

 

(0.19)

 
 

Net loss

  

(0.00)

 

(0.38)

 

(0.26)

 
 

Loss available for common shareholders

  

(0.00)

 

(0.38)

 

(0.25)

 

Weighted average shares outstanding used to

           
 

compute basic and diluted net loss per share amounts

   

24,076,000 

  

24,076,000 

  

24,094,000 

 



See notes to financial statements.

23




REGAN HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006


              
           

Accumulated

  
         

Retained

 

Other

  
   

Series A Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Earnings

 

Comprehensive

  
   

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

(Deficit)

 

Income (loss)

 

Total

              

Balance December 31, 2005

20,959,000 

 

3,921,000 

 

6,561,000 

 

 (8,071,000)

 

 

2,411,000 

 

Comprehensive loss, net of tax:

           
 

Net loss

      

(6,250,000)

   

(6,250,000)

 

Repurchase of redeemable common

           
  

stock

    

79,000 

     

79,000 

 

Reduction to redemption value of

           
  

redeemable common stock

      

165,000 

   

165,000 

 

Stock option compensation

    

10,000 

     

10,000 

Balance December 31, 2006

20,959,000 

 

3,921,000 

 

6,650,000 

 

(14,156,000)

 

 

(3,585,000)

              
 

Net loss

      

(9,055,000)

   

 (9,055,000)

Balance December 31, 2007

20,959,000 

 

3,921,000 

 

6,650,000 

 

(23,211,000)

 

 

 (12,640,000)

              
 

Net loss

      

(110,000)

   

(110,000)

Balance December 31, 2008

20,959,000 

 

3,921,000 

 

6,650,000 

 

(23,321,000)

 

 

(12,750,000)





See notes to financial statements.

24



REGAN HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

   

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
   

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Net loss

 

(110,000)

 

(9,055,000)

 

(6,250,000)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in

          

operating activities:

          
 

Depreciation

  

3,852,000 

  

3,097,000 

  

3,388,000 

 
 

Losses on write-off of fixed assets

  

174,000 

  

1,341,000 

  

33,000 

 
 

Gain on sale of building

  

(214,000)

  

  

 
 

Amortization of deferred gain on sale of building

 

(276,000)

  

(275,000)

  

(291,000)

 
 

Reduction of doubtful accounts

  

(159,000)

  

(7,000)

  

(60,000)

 
 

Allowance for notes receivable

  

236,000 

  

  

 
 

Losses (gains) on trading securities, net

  

1,262,000 

  

(140,000)

  

(826,000)

 
 

Stock option expense

  

  

  

10,000 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

          
 

Sales (purchases) of trading securities, net

  

5,722,000 

  

789,000 

  

562,000 

 
 

Accounts receivable

  

721,000 

  

81,000 

  

269,000 

 
 

Prepaid expenses and deposits

  

147,000 

  

243,000 

  

992,000 

 
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  

(268,000)

  

(1,159,000)

  

699,000 

 
 

Deferred compensation payable

  

(2,605,000)

  

(171,000)

  

46,000 

 
 

Other operating assets and liabilities

  

166,000 

  

309,000 

  

(3,024,000)

 
 

Current assets and liabilities of discontinued operations

 

168,000 

  

(1,264,000)

  

(49,000)

 
 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

8,816,000 

  

(6,211,000)

  

(4,501,000)

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

          

Sales (purchases) of fixed assets

  

3,076,000 

  

(954,000)

  

(2,249,000)

 

Decrease (increase) in temporarily restricted cash

 

656,000 

  

(656,000)

  

 

Proceeds from notes receivable

  

80,000 

  

62,000 

  

127,000 

 

Sales (purchases) of fixed assets from discontinued operations

 

  

1,152,000 

  

(166,000)

 
 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

3,812,000 

  

(396,000)

  

(2,288,000)

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

          

Proceeds from loans/notes payable

  

                   225,000 

  

3,926,000 

  

6,000,000 

 

Payments toward notes/loans payable

  

             (12,377,000)

  

(84,000)

  

(78,000)

 

Repurchases of redeemable common stock

  

                              - 

  

  

(78,000)

 
 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities:

 

(12,152,000)

  

3,842,000 

  

5,844,000 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

476,000 

  

(2,765,000)

  

(945,000)

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

  

                    152,000 

  

2,917,000 

  

3,862,000 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

628,000 

 

152,000 

 

2,917,000 

 
            

Supplemental cash flow information:

          

Taxes paid net of refunds received

 

8,000 

 

(12,000)

 

(18,000)

 

Interest paid

 

565,000 

 

526,000 

 

145,000 

 





See notes to financial statements.

25



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REGAN HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a. Organization

Regan Holding Corp. (the “Company”) is a holding company, incorporated in California in 1990, whose primary operating subsidiary is Legacy Marketing Group (“Legacy Marketing”).

As of December 31, 2008, Legacy Marketing had marketing agreements with American National Insurance Company (“American National”), Investors Insurance Corporation (“Investors Insurance”),  OM Financial (Americom) Life Insurance Company (“OM Financial (Americom)”), and Washington National Insurance Company (“Washington National”) (collectively, the “carriers”).  The marketing agreements grant Legacy Marketing the exclusive right to market certain fixed annuity products issued by the carriers (the “policies”).  In addition, Legacy Marketing is responsible for recruiting independent insurance producers, who contract with Legacy Marketing to sell policies, and are appointed with the applicable carrier.  For providing these services, the carriers pay Legacy Marketing commissions and marketing allowances.

b. Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the accounts of Regan Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Discontinued operations of the prior year financial statements presented were reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to current year discontinued operations.

c. Financial Condition and Liquidity

$8.8 million of cash was provided by operations in 2008. We used $6.2 million and $4.5 million of cash in operations in 2007 and 2006, respectively. We also incurred consolidated net losses of $110,000, $9.1 million and $6.3 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.  If our consolidated net losses continue, a cash shortfall will occur.  To address this issue, during 2007 and 2008, we lowered our cost structure by reducing our employee headcount, by repayment of debt, and by reducing the amount of office equipment leases.  In March 2008, we repaid the Washington National loan using the proceeds from the sale of partnership interests in Legacy TM, LP. In May 2008, we sold our facility in Rome, Georgia and used a portion of the proceeds to repay the mortgage loan. In October 2008, we liquidated our investment portfolio to repay the margin loans obtained from our investment broker and leaving the remaining balance in a money fund. All of these actions eliminated approximately $1.6 million of annual cash used for interest and principal payments in 2008.

As evident from the Company’s prior year results, the Company had operating losses which created negative Shareholders’ equity and a negative working capital position. Starting in 2008, we have  benefited from an increase in the aggregate amount of fixed annuity sales, which we believe is due to the dramatic drop in the equity markets that began last year. The combination of increased sales and reduced costs has resulted in improved cash flows. Although, this may or may not be sustainable, it had a positive impact on the initial operating results for 2009.  The increased sales and acceptance of fixed annuities due to the current economic conditions has helped to improve our cash position and balance sheet.  

In January 2007, the Company exited the prospectdigital business and disposed of its assets.  This action eliminated approximately $1.2 million of annual cash use.

In 2007 the Company and two of its subsidiaries, Legacy Financial Services Inc. (“Legacy Financial”) and Legacy Advisory Services Inc., completed the sale of Legacy Financial’s registered representatives and customer accounts, and the Company received $1 million of cash proceeds from that sale on September 28, 2007.  The cash proceeds from this sale were used to settle outstanding Legacy Financial matters.  

On October 17, 2007, Legacy Marketing entered into an agreement and strategic alliance with a subsidiary of Perot Systems, whereby Legacy Marketing agreed to transfer its third party administration services function and the employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems’ assumption of such administrative service functions.  



26




In the event that a cash shortfall does occur, the Company believes that adequate financing could be obtained to meet its cash flow needs.  However, there can be no assurances that such financing would be available on favorable terms.

d. Revenue Recognition

When a policyholder remits a premium payment to the insurance carrier with an accurate and completed application for an insurance policy, the policy is placed inforce and Legacy Marketing recognizes marketing allowances and commission income.  Legacy Marketing’s carriers’ policyholders have a contractual right to terminate the insurance contract ten to thirty days after a policy is placed inforce.  This return period varies on the type of policy and the jurisdiction in which the policy is sold.  Legacy Marketing gathers historical product return data that does not vary significantly from quarter to quarter, and has historically been predictive of future events.  Returns are estimated using this data and have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements.  

e. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, trading investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes payable   reflect their respective fair value in accordance with Statement of Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, which is based on the prices that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair value hierarchy established in SFAS No. 157 prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels as follows:

Level 1

Observable inputs – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;

Level 2

Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities – such as quoted prices for similar instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data;


Level 3

Unobservable inputs – includes amounts derived from valuation models where one or more significant inputs are unobservable and require us to develop relevant assumptions.


As of December 31, 2008 trading securities valued at $641,000 and a deferred compensation liability valued at $5.3 million were valued using level 1 inputs.

f. Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include marketable securities with an original maturity or remaining maturity of ninety days or less at the time of purchase.

g. Temporarily Restricted Cash

As required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the cash balances of Legacy Financial Services are set aside to satisfy customer claims, settlements and other financial exposures. As of September 29, 2008, Legacy Financial withdrew as a broker-dealer with FINRA and as of December 31, 2008, all the temporarily restricted cash had been expended on claim expenses and other financial exposures as required.

h. Investments

The Company’s investments are classified as available-for-sale or trading securities and are carried at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157 For available-for-sale securities, unrealized gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.  For trading securities, unrealized gains and losses are reported in Selling, general and administrative expenses.

Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related investment as an adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. Interest income is recognized when earned.  Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are recognized in the period sold using the specific identification method for determining cost.



27




Investments classified as available-for-sale are periodically reviewed to determine if declines in fair value below cost are other-than-temporary.  Significant and sustained decreases in quoted market prices, a series of historical and projected operating losses by the investee or other factors are considered as part of the review.  If the decline in fair value has been determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment loss is recorded in Investment income and the individual security is written down to a new cost basis.

i. Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  The Company capitalizes consulting fees and salaries and benefits for employees who are directly associated with the development of software for internal use when both of the following occur:

The preliminary project stage is completed and therefore the project is in the application development stage; and

Management authorizes and commits to funding a software project and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function desired.

Modifications or enhancements made to an existing software product that result in additional functionality are also capitalized.  When the new software is placed in production, we begin amortizing the asset over its estimated useful life.  Training and maintenance costs are accounted for as expenses as they occur.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of each type of asset, as follows:

Computer hardware and purchased software

3-5 years

Internal use software development costs

3-5 years

Leasehold improvements

2-10 years

Furniture and equipment

5 years

Building

40 years


Effective October 17, 2007 (“Transaction Date”), Legacy Marketing entered into an agreement with a subsidiary of Perot Systems Corporation (“Perot Systems”), whereby Legacy Marketing agreed to transfer its third party administration services function and the employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems’ assumption of such administrative service functions.  The estimated time to complete the transition of these administrative services to Perot was 18 months.  Accordingly, the Company reviewed the remaining estimated useful life of internal use software associated with its administrative business and reduced the remaining useful life to 18 months for the affected internal use software assets.

j. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with Statement of Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company reviews long-lived assets and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.  Measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets is based upon management’s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows.  The Company periodically reviews capitalized internal use software to determine if the carrying value is fully recoverable.  If there are future cash flows directly related to the software or the business unit of which it is a part, as applicable, we record an impairment loss when the present value of the future cash flows is less than the carrying value.  If software, or components of software, in development are abandoned, the Company takes a charge to write off the capitalized amount in the period the decision is made to abandon it.

k. Redeemable Common Stock

Redeemable common stock is carried at the greater of the issuance value or the redemption value.  Periodic adjustments to reflect increases or decreases in redemption value are recorded as accretion, with an offsetting adjustment to retained earnings. The Company is currently unable to redeem its redeemable common stock due to restrictions in California corporation law.



28




l. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”).  SFAS 133 requires the Company to measure all derivatives at fair value and to recognize them in the balance sheet as an asset or liability.  For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value of the derivative are reported as other comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings.  Changes in fair value of derivative instruments not considered hedging instruments and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the current period.

m. Income Taxes

The Company provides deferred taxes based on the enacted tax rates in effect on the dates temporary differences between the book and the tax bases of assets and liabilities reverse.

n. Stock Options

The Company measures and recognizes stock based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”).  SFAS 1233R requires compensation expense related to share-based payment transactions, measured at the grant date fair value, to be recognized in the financial statements over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. The Company issues new shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.

o. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, for our financial assets and liabilities.  The adoption of this portion of SFAS No. 157 did not have any effect on our financial position or results of operations and we do not expect the adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to non-financial assets and liabilities to have an effect on our financial position or results of operations.  


In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted of SFAS No. 159 as of January 1, 2008 and it did  not have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. The Company expects the adoption of SFAS 141R to have a material impact on future acquisitions.


In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. This Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The statement amends SFAS No. 133 to enhance the disclosure requirement of derivative and hedging activities by providing adequate information on how such activities impact an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flow. This is intended to improve the transparency of financial reporting related to derivative and hedging activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. Adoption of SFAS No. 161 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operation and financial condition.



29



In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principle. Adoption of SFAS No. 162 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts, an interpretation of SFAS No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. The statement helps resolve diversity resulting in inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities because of differing views about when a loss has been incurred. In addition, the Statement clarifies the financial reporting requirements under SFAS No. 60 of financial guarantee insurance contracts for better comparability. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008. Adoption of SFAS No. 163 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In April 2008, the FASB Staff Position (FSP) issued FAS No. 142-3 Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets  to amend the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No 141, Business Combinations, and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption prohibited. Adoption of FAS No. 142-3 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of oper ations and financial condition.

2. Discontinued Operations

On May 31, 2007, Regan Holding and two of its subsidiaries, Legacy Financial and Legacy Advisory Services Inc., entered into an agreement with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation whereby Legacy Financial transferred its registered representatives and customer accounts to Multi-Financial Securities Corporation.  Under the agreement, on September 28, 2007, Multi-Financial Securities Corporation paid Legacy Financial Services $1 million (11.5%) of the aggregate gross dealer concessions earned at Legacy Financial Services between May 1, 2006, and April 30, 2007, by those transferred representatives who were, as of the measurement date (as defined in the agreement), registered with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation and in good standing with the FINRA .  In addition, on each of the first four anniversary dates of the measurement date, subject to certain conditions, Multi-Financial Securities Corporation is obligated to p ay Legacy Financial Services an amount representing up to four and a half percent (4.5%) of each transferred representative’s aggregate gross dealer concessions earned with Multi-Financial Securities Corporation during the one year period prior to such anniversary date. As of December 31, 2008, Legacy Financial did not meet the specified terms in order to receive a second payment from Multi-Financial Securities Corporation and does not expect to receive any payments related to this agreement in the future.

The Company recognized a $1 million gain on the transfer of Legacy Financial’s registered representatives and customer accounts to Multi-Financial Securities Corporation in 2007, and as a result Legacy Financial had net income of $133,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.  Legacy Financial incurred losses of $660,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.  Legacy Financial’s results are being reported as discontinued operations.  On the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, Legacy Financial’s assets consist of  $294,000 in prepaid expenses as of December 31, 2008 and $282,000 in prepaid expenses and $98,000 in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2007. Legacy Financial’s liabilities consist of  $291,000 in accrued liabilities and $75,000 in accounts payable as of December 31, 2008 and $115,000 in accrued liabilities, $55,000 in commissions payable, and $40,000 in accounts payable as of December 31, 2007

On January 25, 2007, prospectdigital LLC ("prospectdigital"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, sold certain of its assets, which primarily included fixed assets and other miscellaneous operating assets, to PD Holdings LLC ("PD Holdings").  In addition, PD Holdings agreed to assume certain liabilities of prospectdigital.  The action was taken in a continuing effort to reduce our operating expenses, as prospectdigital continued to sustain losses through the date of sale. Prospectdigital’s results are being reported as discontinued operations. On our consolidated balance sheet, prospectdigital’s assets consist of $28,000 in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2008 and $61,000 in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2007. Prospectdigital’s liabilities consist of $32,000 in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2008 and $139,000 in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2007.



30




Lynda Pitts, Chief Executive Officer, and R. Preston Pitts, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, are the primary owners of PD Holdings.  In connection with the sale, the Company also entered into a service agreement with PD Holdings, pursuant to which subsidiaries of the Company provide certain administrative services to PD Holdings, for a fee equal to the cost of the services provided.

Prospectdigital received $116,000 in consideration of the sale, which was greater than the estimated fair value of the assets of prospectdigital being sold, as determined by a third-party independent valuation.  The amount of consideration was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company.

Prospectdigital is being reported as a discontinued operation for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.  On the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, prospectdigital’s assets consist of $28,000 in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2008 and $61,000 in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2007. Prospectdigital’s liabilities consist of $32,000 in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2008 and $139,000 in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2008. Prospectdigital incurred an $189,000 loss on the sale of its assets in 2007.

In January 2006, the Company decided to discontinue the operations of Values Financial Network (“VFN”).  The Company incurred insignificant costs in connection with exiting the operations.  

3. Fixed Assets

  

December 31,

  

2008

 

2007

Computer hardware and purchased software

 

2,638,000 

 

5,280,000 

Internal use software development costs

  

15,236,000 

  

15,353,000 

Leasehold improvements

  

1,161,000 

  

1,161,000 

Capital leases

  

166,000 

   

Furniture and equipment

  

953,000 

  

1,780,000 

Building

     

3,108,000 

Land and land improvements

     

338,000 

   

20,154,000 

  

27,020,000 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

  

(18,499,000)

  

(18,477,000)

Total

 

1,655,000 

 

8,543,000 


Effective October 17, 2007, Legacy Marketing entered into an agreement with a subsidiary of Perot Systems Corporation, whereby Legacy Marketing agreed to transfer its third party administration services function and certain employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems’ assumption of such administrative service functions.  As a result of this transaction, Legacy Marketing recognized a non-cash internal use software impairment charge of approximately $1.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.

On May 23, 2008, the Company sold its office building in Rome, Georgia for $3.5 million for a gain of $214,000. Proceeds from the sale of the building were used to repay the mortgage on the property, the outstanding balance of which was $2.6 million.

Throughout 2008, the Company retired $3 million in various unused computer software and hardware and $827,000 in unused furniture and equipment.



31




4. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

  

December 31,

  

2008

 

2007

Accrued compensation

 

528,000 

 

958,000 

Reserve for medical benefits

  

207,000 

  

744,000 

Accrued sales incentive programs

  

1,020,000 

  

625,000 

Payable to insurance carrier

  

201,000 

  

492,000 

Commissions payable

  

625,000 

  

159,000 

Deferred revenue

  

385,000 

  

247,000 

Accounts payable

  

526,000 

  

436,000 

Miscellaneous accrued expenses

  

316,000 

  

415,000 

Total

 

3,808,000 

 

4,076,000 


5. Notes and Other Borrowings

In 2007, the Company obtained margin loans from its investment broker for general corporate purposes.  The loans bear interest at the lender's base lending rate plus a surcharge based on the amount of the loans (8.5% at December 31, 2007), and are collateralized by the Company's investment portfolio.  As there was no stated maturity date the Company had included the entire balance of $3.9 million as of December 31, 2007, in the current portion of notes payable and other borrowings.

On October 9, 2008, the Company liquidated its investment portfolio for $5.4 million. The proceeds were used to repay the loans from its investment broker, the outstanding balance of which was $4.3 million.


Notes and other borrowings at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

  

December 31,

  

2008

 

2007

Current portion of notes payable and other borrowings

      

Washington National credit agreement

 

 

675,000 

Mortage loan, Rome building

  

  

90,000 

Investment broker margin loans

  

  

3,926,000 

Line of Credit

  

230,000 

  

Total current portion of notes payable and other borrowings

230,000 

  

4,691,000 

       

Notes payable, less current portion

      

Washington National credit agreement

  

  

5,325,000 

Mortage loan, Rome building

  

  

2,499,000 

Line of Credit

  

  

Total notes payable, less current portion

  

  

7,824,000 

       

Total notes and loans payable

 

230,000 

 

12,515,000 

       


On September 8, 2008, the Company entered into a Line of Credit Promissory Note with Lynda Pitts, Chief Executive Officer and Preston Pitts, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company of which $225,000 has been advanced. Interest on the unpaid principal accrues monthly at a rate of 6% per annum. Principal and interest are due upon demand. As of December 31, 2008, $229,000 in principal and interest remained payable under the arrangement.



32




On July 20, 2006, Legacy Marketing entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Washington National Insurance Company (the “Lender”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Lender made a non-revolving multiple advance term loan (the “Term Loan”) to Legacy Marketing totaling $6.0 million.  On April 12, 2007, Legacy Marketing amended certain terms of the Credit Agreement through the execution of Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, the “Amended Agreement”) and (1) extended the final maturity of the loan under the Credit Agreement from April 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012; (2) changed certain of the requirements for mandatory prepayments under the Credit Agreement; (3) changed certain terms of the financial covenants specified in the Credit Agreement; and (4) revised certain definitions contained in the Credit Agreement.  As o f December 31, 2007, the balance due under the Credit Agreement was $6.0 million.


On March 26, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to exchange its asset based trailing commissions (“trail commissions”) to Legacy TM for a limited partnership interest in Legacy TM (the “Partnership”). Subsequently, the company sold a portion of its limited partnership interest – Class B interest – for $6.5 million in cash and retained an interest in the limited partnership – Class A interest. The transaction closed on March 26, 2008. The Class A limited partnership interest in the Partnership, retained by Legacy Marketing, includes the beneficial interest in 33 1/3% of the trail commission revenue received on those policies in effect on or prior to the closing date for the one year period subsequent to the closing date and all revenue associated with policies that become effective after the closing date. The Company’s limited partnership interest is unencumbered. Lynda Pitts, Chief Executive Officer, and Pr eston Pitts, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each of whom is also a director of the Company, are the general partners of the Partnership and together own all of the Class B interests in the Partnership.


A special committee of the Board of Directors of the Company comprising the independent directors, Ute Scott-Smith, J. Daniel Speight, Jr. and Donald Ratajczak, approved the amount of consideration. In connection with the committee’s deliberations the Company obtained a fairness opinion from an independent third party stating that the total value of the transaction to the Company was within an acceptable range of estimated fair values of the future trail commission cash flows. A portion of the proceeds was used to pay the $6 million note payable, plus accrued interest, to Washington National Insurance Company and interest accrued thereon. The remainder of the proceeds is available for general corporate purposes.

The Company had a mortgage on its office building in Rome, Georgia.  The outstanding balance of the note was $2.6 million as of December 31, 2007. On May 23, 2008, the Company sold its office building in Rome, Georgia for $3.5 million for a gain of $214,000. Proceeds from the sale of the building were used to repay the mortgage on the property, the outstanding balance of which was $2.6 million.

6. Deferred Compensation Payable

The Company sponsors a qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan, which is available to all employees.  The 401(k) plan allows employees to defer, on a pre-tax basis, up to 70% of their annual compensation as contributions to the 401(k) plan, subject to a maximum of $15,500.  The Company typically matches 50% of each employee’s contributions up to 6% of their annual compensation, subject to a maximum of $7,750.  The Company’s matching contributions were $134,000, $223,000, and $223,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

The Company also sponsors a non-qualified tax deferred compensation plan, which is available to certain employees who, because of Internal Revenue Code limitations, are prohibited from contributing the maximum percentage of salary to the 401(k) Plan.  Under this deferred compensation plan, certain employees may defer, on a pre-tax basis, a percentage of annual compensation, including bonuses.  The Company typically matches 50% of each employee’s contributions up to a maximum of 6% of annual compensation, less amounts already matched under the 401(k) plan.  The Company made matching contributions of $0, $0, and $2,000 during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.  As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, employee contributions and Company matching contributions, including cumulative investment gains (losses), totaled $361,000 and $547,000, respectively.



33



The Company also sponsors a non-qualified tax deferred compensation plan under which producers who earn a minimum of $100,000 may defer, on a pre-tax basis, up to 50% of annual commissions.  In addition, the Company will match producer contributions for those producers who earn over $250,000 in annual commissions at rates ranging from 2% to 5% of amounts deferred, depending on the level of annual commissions earned.  During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, matching contributions related to the producer commission deferral plan were $2,000, $1,000, and $2,000, respectively.  Producer contributions and Company matching contributions, including cumulative investment gains, totaled $5 million and $7.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  The liability to the employee or producer is credited or charged based on indexes selected by the participant.

All contributions made to and earnings incurred thereon the employee and producer non-qualified tax deferred compensation plans are considered deemed investments and are not to be considered or construed as an actual investment of funds. The participant’s deemed investment is administered by a third-party to reflect the respective market activity and in turn, the fair value of the liability to the Company. In addition, the employee or producer who is a participant in the plan shall remain at all times an unsecured creditor of the Company.

Both of the Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plans follow the guidelines of the IRC 401A. In 2008, the IRS mandated that all companies offering such plans be in compliance by December 31, 2008. The Company has successfully complied with these requirements within the IRS’ established time frame.

7. Sales Incentive Program

During 2008, 2007 and 2006, Legacy Marketing initiated sales incentive programs for its independent insurance producers and its top producers (“Wholesalers”), which granted bonuses to the producers and Wholesalers based upon their achievement of predetermined monthly sales targets. The Company recorded expense of $642,000 during the year ended December 31, 2008, related to these programs, of which $321,000 was paid as of December 31, 2008. The Company recorded expense of $1.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, related to these programs, of which $707,000 was paid as of December 31, 2007.  The Company recorded expense of $1.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2006 related to these programs, of which $332,000 was paid as of December 31, 2006.  The amounts expensed are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.  

8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company leases office and warehouse premises and certain office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases.  Related rent expense of $1.2 million, $1.3 million, and $1.3 million, is included in occupancy costs for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.  Total rentals for leases of equipment included in equipment expense were $461,000, $653,000, and $747,000, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

The Company’s future minimum annual lease commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2008 are as follows:


  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Operating Leases

 

Capital

Leases

   

2009

  

994,000 

 

124,000 

   

2010

   

929,000 

  

75,000 

   

2011

   

870,000 

  

21,000 

   

2012

   

878,000 

  

19,000 

   

2013

   

905,000 

  

18,000 

   

Thereafter

   

1,735,000 

  

4,000 

 

Total minimum lease payments

  

6,311,000 

  

261,000 

 

Less executory costs

       

 (97,000)

 

Less amounts representing interest

      

 (31,000)

 

Present value of mimimum capital lease payments

    

133,000 

 

Less current portion

       

 (69,000)

 

Long-term portion

       

64,000 

           



34




Pursuant to the terms of our Amended and Restated Shareholder's Agreement with Lynda L. Pitts, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, upon the death of Mrs. Pitts, the Company would have the option (but not the obligation) to purchase from Mrs. Pitts’ estate all shares of common stock that were owned by Mrs. Pitts at the time of her death, or were transferred by her to one or more trusts prior to her death.  In addition, upon the death of Mrs. Pitts, her heirs would have the option (but not the obligation) to sell their inherited shares to the Company. The purchase price to be paid by the Company shall be equal to 125% of the fair market value of the shares.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company believes that 125% of the fair market value of the shares owned by Mrs. Pitts was equal to $562,000.  The Company has purchased life insurance coverage for the purp ose of funding this potential obligation upon Mrs. Pitts’ death.

The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.  Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these cases, management believes, based on discussions with legal counsel, that the ultimate disposition of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

As part of the Company’s agreements with certain of its insurance producers, the Company may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to offer to purchase the business of the producers.  At December 31, 2008, there were no outstanding commitments by the Company relating to such obligations.

Under both of the Company’s employee and producer non-qualified deferred compensation plans, the Company pays out distributions that have come due for that year in accordance with the each of the deferred compensation participants’ irrevocable election: attainment age, termination, or the early of both. In 2008, the Company paid out $302,000 and expects to pay out $1.2 million in 2009. However, the Company reserves the right to delay or suspend a payment that may jeopardize the Company’s financial condition, as outlined in the IRS regulation 401A.

9. Redeemable Common Stock

Between 1990 and 1992, the Company issued Series A and Series B redeemable common stock to certain shareholders. The Company is obligated to repurchase the redeemable common stock at the current fair market value.  Because there is no active trading market for the Company’s stock that would establish market value, the Company’s Board of Directors typically approve a redemption value for Series A redeemable common stock and for Series B redeemable common stock based on the stock valuation prepared by management.  However, the Company is currently unable to redeem its redeemable common stock due to restrictions in the California corporations law.

  

Series A

 

Series B

 

Total

  

Redeemable Common

 

Redeemable Common

 

Redeemable Common

  

Stock

 

Stock

 

Stock

  

Shares

 

Carrying

Amount

 

Shares

 

Carrying

Amount

 

Shares

 

Carrying Amount

Balance January 1, 2006

2,657,000 

 

4,531,000 

 

550,000 

 

1,688,000 

 

3,207,000 

 

6,219,000 

Redemptions and retirement of common stock

(91,000)

 

(157,000)

 

 

 

(91,000)

 

(157,000)

Reduction to redemption value

 

(165,000)

 

 

 

 

(165,000)

Balance December 31, 2006

2,566,000 

 

4,209,000 

 

550,000 

 

1,688,000 

 

3,116,000 

 

5,897,000 

Redemptions and retirement of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

Reduction to redemption value

 

 

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2007

2,566,000 

 

4,209,000 

 

550,000 

 

1,688,000 

 

3,116,000 

 

5,897,000 

Redemptions and retirement of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

Reduction to redemption value

 

 

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2008

2,566,000 

 

4,209,000 

 

550,000 

 

1,688,000 

 

3,116,000 

 

5,897,000 

             
             


The Company recorded redeemable common stock reduction of $0, $0, and $165,000 related to Series A redeemable common stock for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.  Redeemable common stock is carried at the greater of the issuance value or the redemption value.  



35




10. Stock Options and Stock Awards

The Company currently sponsors two stock-based compensation plans.  Under both plans, the exercise price of each option equals the estimated fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, as estimated by management, except for incentive stock options granted to shareholders who own 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock, where the exercise price equals 110% of the estimated fair value. Both plans are administered by committees, which are appointed by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Producer Option Plan — Under the Regan Holding Corp. Producer Stock Option and Award Plan (the “Producer Option Plan”), the Company may grant to Legacy Marketing producers and Legacy Financial registered representatives shares of the Company’s common stock and non-qualified stock options (the “Producer Options”) to purchase the Company’s common stock.  A total of 12.5 million shares have been reserved for grant under the Producer Option Plan.  We did not grant any stock options in either 2008 or 2007 and granted a total of 15,000 stock options to a Producer in the year ended December 31, 2006.  Compensation expense related to stock options awarded during 2006 and 2005 was immaterial.  There were no shares of Series A common stock awarded to non-employees during 2008, 2007 and 2006.

Employee Option Plan — Under the Regan Holding Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “Employee Option Plan”), the Company may grant to employees and directors incentive stock options and non-qualified options to purchase the Company’s common stock (collectively referred to herein as “Employee Options”).  A total of 8.5 million shares have been reserved for grant under the Employee Option Plan.  The Employee Options generally vest over four or five years and expire in ten years, except for incentive stock options granted to shareholders who own 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s stock, which expire in five years.  

The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes stock option valuation model.  The estimated fair value of employee stock option awards is amortized over the award’s vesting period on a straight-line basis.  There were no stock options awarded in either 2008 or 2007, and the compensation expense related to stock options awarded in 2006 was immaterial.

Stock option activity under both plans was as follows:

     

Total

 
     

Weighted Average

 
   

Shares

 

Exercise Price

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2005

 

6,036,000

 

$

1.43

 

Granted

  

60,000

 

$

0.68

 

Exercised

  

-   

 

$

-   

 

Forfeited

  

(1,794,000)

 

$

1.56

 
        

Outstanding at December 31, 2006

 

4,302,000

 

$

1.37

 

Granted

  

-   

 

$

-   

 

Exercised

  

-   

 

$

-   

 

Forfeited

  

(1,064,000)

 

$

1.38

 
        

Outstanding at December 31, 2007

 

3,238,000

 

$

1.37

 

Granted

  

-   

 

$

-   

 

Exercised

  

-   

 

$

-   

 

Forfeited

  

(977,000)

 

$

1.23

 
        

Outstanding at December 31, 2008

 

2,261,000

 

$

1.43

 
        

Exercisable at December 31, 2006

 

4,126,000

 

$

1.37

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2007

 

3,210,000

 

$

1.37

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2008

 

2,261,000

 

$

1.43

 



36




The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2008, under both plans:


  

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

    

Weighted

 

Weighted

   

Weighted

    

Average

 

Average

   

Average

    

Remaining

 

Exercise

   

Exercise

Range of exercise prices

 

Shares

 

Contractual Life

 

Price

 

Shares

 

Price

$0.52-$0.68

 

30,000

 

7.34

 

$0.52

 

30,000

 

$0.52

$0.73-$1.03

 

253,000

 

6.97

 

$0.84

 

253,000

 

$0.84

$1.27-$1.27

 

347,000

 

0.02

 

$1.27

 

347,000

 

$1.27

$1.39-$1.39

 

4,000

 

0.50

 

$1.39

 

4,000

 

$1.39

$1.53-$1.55

 

1,068,000

 

1.33

 

$1.53

 

1,068,000

 

$1.53

$1.61-$1.61

 

120,000

 

2.00

 

$1.61

 

120,000

 

$1.61

$1.65-$1.69

 

439,000

 

3.84

 

$1.68

 

439,000

 

$1.68

  

2,261,000

 

2.36

 

$1.43

 

2,261,000

 

$1.43


11. Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized as temporary differences between amounts reported in the financial statements and the future tax consequences attributable to those differences that are expected to be recovered or settled.

The income tax (benefit) provision attributable to our continuing and discontinued operations was as follows:

   

For the Year Ended December 31,

   

2008

 

2007

 

2006

           

Continuing operations

 

213,000 

 

5,000 

 

(2,698,000)

Discontinued operations

  

(97,000)

  

5,000 

  

5,000 

Total

  

116,000 

 

10,000 

 

(2,693,000)

           


The provision for (benefit from) federal and state income taxes from continuing operations consist of amounts currently payable (receivable) and amounts deferred, which for the periods indicated, are shown below:

  

For the Year Ended December 31,

  

2008

 

2007

 

2006

          

Current income taxes:

         

Federal

 

21,000 

 

 

(2,658,000)

State

  

192,000 

  

5,000 

  

(40,000)

Total current

  

213,000 

  

5,000 

  

(2,698,000)

          

Deferred income taxes:

         

Federal

  

  

  

State

  

  

  

Total deferred

  

  

  

          

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

$

213,000 

 

5,000 

 

(2,698,000)




37



The Company’s deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following:

   

December 31,

   

2008

 

2007

        

Producer stock option and stock awards

 

36,000 

 

71,000 

Producer deferred compensation

  

2,117,000 

  

3,154,000 

Accrued sales convention costs

  

  

34,000 

Deferred gain on sale/leaseback of building

  

750,000 

  

860,000 

Federal net operating loss carryforward

  

7,601,000 

  

7,958,000 

Federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforward

  

214,000 

  

192,000 

State net operating loss carryforward, net of federal taxes

  

2,303,000 

  

2,325,000 

State alternative minimum tax credit carryforward,

      
 

net of federal taxes

  

178,000 

  

181,000 

Other deferred tax assets, net of federal taxes

  

378,000 

  

653,000 

 

Subtotal deferred tax assets

  

13,577,000 

  

15,428,000 

Valuation allowance

  

 (13,285,000)

  

(13,219,000)

 

Subtotal deferred tax assets after valuation allowance

  

292,000 

  

2,209,000 

        

Fixed assets depreciation

  

 (292,000)

  

(1,706,000)

Unrealized gains

  

  

(503,000)

 

Subtotal deferred tax liabilities

  

 (292,000)

  

(2,209,000)

        

Deferred tax assets, net

 

 


In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of deferred tax assets will, or will not, be realized.  The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible.  Due to cumulative losses in recent years, management established a valuation allowance of $13.3 million as of December 31, 2008.  This represents a net increase in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $66,000 and $3.4 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The income tax provision (benefit) in 2008, 2007 and 2006 differed from the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% to pretax income (loss) as a result of the following:

   

For the Year Ended December 31,

   

2008

 

2007

 

2006

           

Federal income tax benefit at statutory rate (34%)

 

238,000 

 

(3,177,000)

 

(2,501,000)

Increase (reductions) in income taxes resulting from:

         

State franchise taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

  

126,000 

  

3,000 

  

(27,000)

Expired producer stock options unexercised

  

30,000 

  

28,000 

  

283,000 

Valuation allowance for remaining producer stock options

  

(27,000)

  

(25,000)

  

(249,000)

Valuation allowance for federal net operating loss carryforward

         

   and other temporary differences

  

(245,000)

  

3,032,000 

  

2,309,000 

Settlement of prior years' federal income taxes

  

  

  

(2,660,000)

Valuation allowance for federal alternative minimum tax credit

         

   carryforward

  

22,000 

  

  

2,000 

Intercompany adjustments for discontinued operations

  

74,000 

  

137,000 

  

121,000 

Other

   

(5,000)

  

7,000 

  

24,000 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

213,000 

 

5,000 

 

(2,698,000)




38




As of December 31, 2008, the Company had federal and primary state net operating loss carryforwards of $22.4 million and $40.6 million, respectively.  On December 31, 2025, 2026 and 2027, $3.9 million, $12.1 million and $6.3 million, respectively, of the federal net operating losses will expire.  On December 31, 2014, $4.9 million of the state net operating losses will begin to expire.  The Company also has federal and state alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $214,000 and $270,000, respectively.  These credits do not have an expiration date.  Federal and state tax valuation allowances have been established for all of the federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and the federal and state tax credit carryforwards.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48).  This interpretation creates a two step approach for evaluation of uncertain tax positions.  Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination.  Measurement (step two) determines the highest amount of benefit that more likely than not will be realized upon settlement.  The Company does not currently have an unrecognized tax benefit balance and for federal income tax purposes, the statute of limitations is open for tax years 2005 through 2008.  The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

12. Loss per Share

The basic and diluted income (loss) per share calculations are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding including shares of redeemable common stock.

     

For the Year Ended

     

December 31,

     

2008

 

2007

 

2006

             
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

488,000 

 

(9,349,000)

 

 (4,658,000)

  

Loss from discontinued operation

  

(598,000)

  

294,000 

  

 (1,592,000)

 

Net loss

   

(110,000)

  

(9,055,000)

  

 (6,250,000)

  

Reduction of redeemable common stock

  

  

  

165,000 

 

Net loss available for common shareholders

 

(110,000)

 

(9,055,000)

 

(6,085,000)

             
             
 

Weighted average shares used to compute basic and diluted

         
  

net income (loss) per share amounts:

  

24,076,000 

  

24,076,000 

  

24,094,000 

 

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

         
  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

0.02 

 

(0.39)

 

(0.19)

  

Net loss

  

(0.00)

 

(0.38)

 

(0.26)

  

Net loss available for common shareholders

 

(0.00)

 

(0.38)

 

(0.25)

             
             


Outstanding options to purchase 2.3 million, 3.2 million, and 4.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share for those periods, as the effect would have been antidilutive.  



39




13. Concentration of Risk

In 2008, Legacy Marketing sold and marketed its products primarily on behalf of four unaffiliated insurance carriers: Investors Insurance, Washington National, American National, and OM Financial (Americom).  The agreements with those carriers generated a significant portion of the Company’s total consolidated revenue of $12.6 million, which excludes the gain on the sale of partnership interests of $6.5 million:

  

2008

 

2007

 

2006

Investors Insurance

 

26%

 

7%

 

7%

Washington National

 

14%

 

26%

 

27%

American National

 

12%

 

21%

 

21%

OM Financial (Americom)

 

10%

 

9%

 

14%

Legacy Marketing’s revenues are derived primarily from sales and marketing of the following fixed annuity product series:

   

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

PremierMark(SM) series (Investors Insurance)

 

22%

 

5%

 

3%

 

RewardMark(SM) series (Washington National)

 

14%

 

26%

 

27%

 

BenchMark(SM) series (American National)

 

11%

 

19%

 

20%

 

AmeriMark Freedom (SM) series (OM Financial)

 

10%

 

9%

 

14%

 
         
         


Effective October 17, 2007, Legacy Marketing entered into an agreement and strategic alliance with a subsidiary of Perot Systems, whereby Legacy Marketing agreed to transfer its third party administration services function and the employees who provide these services to Perot Systems in exchange for Perot Systems’ assumption of such administrative service functions.  Perot Systems will also become the exclusive provider of administrative services for Legacy Marketing’s future portfolio of annuity products.  Pursuant to this arrangement, the Company had a $21,172 payable to Perot Systems at December 31, 2008. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, Legacy Marketing received approximately $5.3 million and $7.4 million, respectively, in gross revenue under the administrative agreements with carriers.  The termination of administrative agreements does not affect the commissions earned by Legacy Marketing on additional premiums received or assets under management with respect to the underlying insurance contracts.

14. Sale/Leaseback of Office Building

On November 18, 2005, the Company sold its office buildings in Petaluma, California for $12.8 million.  The Company and the third party buyer (the “Buyer”) further agreed to enter into a ten year lease agreement, concurrently with the sale of the buildings, whereby the Company leased back 71,612 square feet through March 14, 2007, and will continue to lease back 47,612 square feet for the remainder of the lease term.  The monthly base rent is $1.29 per square foot and will increase annually by three percent during the term of the lease, in addition to monthly taxes and operating expenses.  Pursuant to the terms of the lease, the Company paid the Buyer a security deposit of $1.0 million and advance rent of $980,000.  The advance rent was utilized to pay the monthly base rent, monthly taxes and operating expenses during the first nine months of the lease term.  The security deposit will be reduced if the Company meets certain profitability criteria as specified in the lease agreement.



40



Supplementary Data

Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

  

First Quarter

 

Second Quarter

 

Third Quarter

 

Fourth Quarter

 

Year

2008

               

Total revenue

 

10,010,000 

 

2,820,000 

 

3,065,000 

 

3,245,000 

 

19,140,000 

Operating income (loss)

4,700,000 

 

 (2,252,000)

 

(1,489,000)

 

(155,000)

 

804,000 

Net income (loss)

4,149,000 

 

 (2,195,000)

 

(1,567,000)

 

(497,000)

 

(110,000)

Basic and diluted earnings per share:

              

Loss available to common shareholders

0.17 

 

(0.09)

 

(0.07)

 

(0.02)

 

(0.00)

2007

               

Total revenue

 

5,401,000 

 

5,509,000 

 

4,441,000 

 

4,516,000 

 

19,867,000 

Operating loss

 

(2,133,000)

 

(1,860,000)

 

(1,845,000)

 

(3,019,000)

 

(8,857,000)

Net loss

 

(2,537,000)

 

 (1,957,000)

 

(1,090,000)

 

(3,471,000)

 

(9,055,000)

Basic and diluted earnings per share:

              

Loss available to common shareholders

(0.11)

 

(0.08)

 

(0.05)

 

(0.14)

 

(0.38)

                




41




Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

       

Additions

 

Deductions

   
    

Balance at

 

charged to

 

charged to

 

Balance

    

beginning

 

costs and

 

costs and

 

at end of

    

of period

 

expenses

 

expenses

 

period

2008

             

Allowance for uncollectible accounts

 

382,000 

 

126,000 

 

(488,000)

 

20,000 

State net operating loss carryforward

            
 

valuation allowance

 

2,682,000 

 

60,000 

 

(17,000)

 

2,725,000 

State alternative minimum tax credit

            
 

carryforward valuation allowance

 

181,000 

    

(3,000)

 

178,000 

Producer stock option deferred tax

            
 

valuation allowance

 

65,000 

    

(32,000)

 

33,000 

Federal net operating loss carryforward

  

         
 

valuation allowance

 

9,987,000 

 

402,000 

 

(369,000)

 

10,020,000 

Federal alternative minimum tax credit

            
 

carryforward valuation allowance

 

192,000 

 

22,000 

    

214,000 

Other

  

112,000 

 

3,000 

    

115,000 

2007

             

Allowance for uncollectible accounts

 

389,000 

 

29,000 

 

(36,000)

 

382,000 

State net operating loss carryforward

            
 

valuation allowance

 

2,332,000 

 

491,000 

 

(141,000)

 

2,682,000 

State alternative minimum tax credit

            
 

carryforward valuation allowance

 

181,000 

 

 

 

181,000 

Producer stock option deferred tax

            
 

valuation allowance

 

95,000 

 

 

(30,000)

 

65,000 

Federal net operating loss carryforward

            
 

valuation allowance

 

6,917,000 

 

3,069,000 

 

 

9,986,000 

Federal alternative minimum tax credit

            
 

carryforward valuation allowance

 

192,000 

 

 

 

192,000 

Other

  

110,000 

 

2,000 

 

 

112,000 

2006

             

Allowance for uncollectible accounts

 

429,000 

 

65,000 

 

(105,000)

 

389,000 

State net operating loss carryforward

            
 

valuation allowance

 

1,842,000 

 

490,000 

 

 

2,332,000 

State alternative minimum tax credit

            
 

carryforward valuation allowance

 

181,000 

 

 

 

181,000 

Producer stock option deferred tax

            
 

valuation allowance

 

441,000 

 

4,000 

 

(350,000)

 

95,000 

Federal net operating loss carryforward

            
 

valuation allowance

 

3,954,000 

 

2,963,000 

 

 

6,917,000 

Federal alternative minimum tax credit

            
 

carryforward valuation allowance

 

191,000 

 

1,000 

 

 

192,000 

Other

  

109,000 

 

1,000 

 

 

110,000 



42



Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and executed, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.  As of December 31, 2008, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated, with the participation of our management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures based upon the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization s of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, also evaluated our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  Based on that evaluation, there have been no such changes during the period covered by this report.

The Company has a Disclosure Committee, consisting of certain executives of the Company.  The Disclosure Committee meets quarterly as part of the closing process and reviews each financial statement line item and footnote disclosure to ensure the impacts of all business activity and transactions have been appropriately accounted for and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Company.  The Disclosure Committee also reviews detailed analytics of the Company’s performance and assesses the need for any additional disclosures based on the relevant reporting period’s activity.  The Disclosure Committee began reviewing the disclosures made by the Company in its filings with the SEC starting with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

As of December 31, 2008, we performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the material financial and non-financial information required to be disclosed in our annual report and filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported timely within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Act, of 1933 as amended, is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Based on our evaluation, our management, incl uding our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2008, are effective at such reasonable assurance level.  There can be no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

Our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is defined as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and asset dispositions; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transaction are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.



43



Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projects of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.  Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2008.

This management report on internal control over financial reporting shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the most recent fiscal quarter, there have not been any significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.



44



PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information required by Items 401, 405 and 406 of Regulation S-K will be contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement in the section titled “Election of Directors.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

We have a Finance Code of Professional Conduct that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer,  Chief Operations Officer, Chief Marketing Officer, Vice President of Product Development, Vice President of Compliance, and employees of the finance division.  The Finance Code of Professional Conduct can be accessed at our Website at www.legacynet.com.  Printed copies may be obtained, free of charge, by writing to our Chief Financial Officer at 2090 Marina Avenue, Petaluma, California 94954.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Section 16(a)”), requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5 with the SEC and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.  Such officers, directors and ten-percent stockholders are also required by the SEC rules to furnish the Company with copies of all such forms that they file.  The Company believes that during 2008 all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and ten-percent stockholders were complied with.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information required by Item 11 will be contained in an amendment or in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement in the section titled “Executive Compensation.”  Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Any information required by Item 12, except for the information set forth below, will be contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement in the section titled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans:

(a)

(b)

(c)

Number of shares remaining available

Number of shares to be

Weighted-average

for future issuance under equity

issued upon exercise of

exercise price of

compensation plans (excluding

Plan category

outstanding options

outstanding options

securities reflected in column (a))

——————————

——————————

————————–

—————————————————


Equity compensation

plans approved by

stockholders(1)

 2,261,000

$1.43

18,739,000

 (1)

Includes the Regan Holding Corp. Producer Stock Option and Award Plan and the Regan Holding Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan

Regan Holding Corp. stockholders have approved all equity compensation plans.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information required by Item 13 will be contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement in the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”  Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services will be contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement in the section titled “Audit Fees”.  Such information is incorporated by reference herein.



45




PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

Index to Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules:

1.

The following financial statements are included in Item 8:

(i)

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms.

(ii)

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.

(iii)

Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.

(iv)

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.

(v)

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.

(vi)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2.

Financial statement schedules - schedule II - valuation and qualifying accounts (included in Item 8)

3.

See (b) below.

 (b)

Exhibit Index

3(a)

Restated Articles of Incorporation. (2)

3(b)(2)

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. (3)

4(a)

Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2003, by and among the Company, Lynda Regan, Alysia Anne Regan, Melissa Louise Regan and RAM Investments. (4)

10(a)

Form of Producer Agreement. (1)

10(b) *

401(K) Profit Sharing Plan & Trust dated July 1, 1994. (1)

10(c)

Producer Stock Award and Stock Option Plan, as amended. (5)

10(d)(1)

1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (5)

10(e)

Commercial Note between SunTrust Bank and the Company executed April 23, 2004. (7)

10(f)

Agreement of Purchase and Sale between Regan Holding Corp. and Basin Street Properties, dated July 25, 2005, and related Lease, dated November 18, 2005. (10)

10(g)

Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale between Regan Holding Corp. and Basin Street Properties, dated November 14, 2005. (10)

10(h)

Credit Agreement between Legacy Marketing Group and Washington National Insurance Company dated July 20, 2006. (8)

10(i)

Asset Purchase Agreement between Prospectdigital LLC and PD Holdings LLC, dated January 25, 2007. (9)

10(j)

Asset Purchase Agreement between Transaction Applications Group, Inc. and Legacy Marketing Group, dated October 17, 2007. (11)

10(k)

Lease Agreement between Regan Holding Corp. and Perot Systems Corporation, dated October 17, 2007. (11)

10(l)

License and Hosting Agreement between Transaction Applications Group, Inc. and Legacy Marketing Group, dated October 17, 2007. (11)

10(m)

Guaranty by Perot Systems Corporation of Payment and Obligations of Transaction Applications Group, Inc. under the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 17, 2007. (11)

10(n)

Guaranty by Regan Holding Corp. of Payment and Obligations of Legacy Marketing Group, Inc. under the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 17, 2007. (11)

21

Subsidiaries of Regan Holding Corp.

31.1  

Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.

31.2  

Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.

32.1  

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350.

32.2  

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350.

——————————

 *

Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.

(1)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994.



46



(2)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s quarterly Form 10-Q for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 1996.

(3)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s quarterly Form 10-Q for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2000.

(4)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s quarterly Form 10-Q for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003.

(5)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement dated July 31, 2001.

(6)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2002.

(7)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2004.   

(8)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006.

(9)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2007.

(10)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

(11)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.



47



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

By: /s/ Lynda L. Pitts                                 

Date: March 31, 2009

Lynda L. Pitts

Chairman of the Board of Directors and

Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ R. Preston Pitts                               

Date: March 31, 2009

R. Preston Pitts

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: /s/ Lynda L. Pitts                                 

Date: March 31, 2009

Lynda L. Pitts

Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief

Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

By: /s/ R. Preston Pitts                               

Date: March 31, 2009

R. Preston Pitts

Director, President

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

By: /s/ Donald Ratajczak                            

Date: March 31, 2009

Donald Ratajczak

Director

By: /s/ Ute Scott-Smith                              

Date: March 31, 2009

Ute Scott-Smith

Director

By: /s/ J. Daniel Speight, Jr.                       

Date: March 31, 2009

J. Daniel Speight, Jr.

Director



48


EX-21 2 p20611ex21.htm EXHIBIT 21 Subsidiaries of Regan Holding Corp

Exhibit 21


Subsidiaries of Regan Holding Corp.

Legacy Marketing Group (California)

Legacy Financial Services (California)

Imagent Online, LLC (Delaware)

Prospectdigital, LLC (Arizona)

Values Financial Network (Delaware)





EX-31 3 p20611ex311.htm EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS

EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS


I, Lynda L. Pitts, Chief Executive Officer of Regan Holding Corp., certify that:


1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Regan Holding Corp.;


2

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  March 31, 2009

By: /s/ Lynda L. Pitts                          

Lynda L. Pitts

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer









EX-31 4 p20611ex312.htm EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS

EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATIONS


I, R. Preston Pitts, Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of Regan Holding Corp., certify that:


1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Regan Holding Corp.;


2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 31, 2009

  By: /s/ R. Preston Pitts                               

R. Preston Pitts

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer



EX-32 5 p20611ex321.htm EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I am the Chief Executive Officer of Regan Holding Corp., a California corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 ("Form 10-K").


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 31, 2009

By: /s/ Lynda L. Pitts               

Lynda L. Pitts

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regan Holding Corp. and will be retained by Regan Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






EX-32 6 p20611ex322.htm EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I am the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of Regan Holding Corp., a California corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 ("Form 10-K").


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 31, 2009


By: /s/ R. Preston Pitts                                   

R. Preston Pitts

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regan Holding Corp. and will be retained by Regan Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----