10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File Number: 000-24149

CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Wisconsin	37-1203599
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
N27 W24025 Paul Court, Pewaukee, Wisconsin	53072
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (262) 695-6010

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value Per Share

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registered is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes £     No x

Indicate by check mark if the registered is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes £     No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x     No £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or other information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer £	Accelerated filer £	Non-accelerated filer £	Smaller reporting company x
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes £     No x

While there is currently no active trading market for shares of CIB Marine's common stock, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $57,758,000 (based upon the closing price of $3.35 per share of the registrant's common stock on the OTC "Pink Sheets" as of June 30, 2007).

As of February 29, 2008, there were issued and outstanding 18,346,442 shares of the registrant’s common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 29, 2008 are incorporated into Part III.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This document is intended to speak as of December 31, 2007, except as otherwise noted.

FORM 10-K TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	Part I
Item 1	— Business	3
Item 1A	— Risk Factors	13
Item 1B	— Unresolved Staff Comments	17
Item 2	— Properties	17
Item 3	— Legal Proceedings	18
Item 4	— Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	22
	Part II
Item 5	— Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	23
Item 6	— Selected Financial Data	23
Item 7	— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
Item 7A	— Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	62
Item 8	— Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	65
Item 9	— Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	108
Item 9A(T)	— Controls and Procedures	108
Item 9B	— Other Information	109
	Part III
Item 10	— Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	109
Item 11	— Executive Compensation	109
Item 12	— Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	109
Item 13	— Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	110
Item 14	— Principal Accountant Fees and Services	110
	Part IV
Item 15	— Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	110
Signatures		113

2

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

CIB MARINE

CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (“CIB Marine”) is a multi-bank holding company with its principal executive offices in Pewaukee, Wisconsin, a suburb of Milwaukee. CIB Marine owned and operatedthree separatelychartered commercial banking organizations at December 31, 2007:

· Central Illinois Bank, with its main office in Champaign, Illinois;

· Marine Bank, with its main office in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, a suburb of Milwaukee (“Marine Bank”); and

· Citrus Bank, N.A, with its main office in Vero Beach, Florida (“Citrus Bank”)

In March 2006, CIB Marine merged Marine Bank, a federal savings bank whose main office was located in Scottsdale, Arizona (“Marine FSB”) into Marine Bank. In August 2006, CIB Marine merged CIB Bank, whose main office was located in Indianapolis, Indiana (“CIB-Indiana”) into Marine Bank.

CIB Marine was originally incorporated in the State of Illinois in 1985 as Sidney Bancorporation, Inc., a one-bank holding company headquartered in Sidney, Illinois. The Company subsequently changed its name to Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc. On August 27, 1999, Central Illinois Bancorp reincorporated as a Wisconsin corporation and changed its name to CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.

CIB Marine offers a full array of traditional banking services through its bank subsidiaries. These services include a broad range of loan products, such as commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and residential construction loans, one-to-four family residential real estate loans, consumer loans, and commercial and standby letters of credit; accepting demand, savings and time deposits, providing commercial paper and repurchase agreements; and providing other banking services.

During 2003, CIB Marine shifted its strategic focus from business development and asset growth to improving the company’s credit administration function, asset quality, and liquidity and capital positions. The change in emphasis occurred in response to a significant deterioration in the credit quality of the loan portfolio and other credit related matters, including credit concentration risk and weaknesses in the credit administration process, identified by the bank and bank holding company regulators during their regular examinations in 2002 and 2003. These issues subsequently resulted in the issuance of various orders, agreements and memoranda with the banking regulators, CIB Marine and its bank subsidiaries. During 2004 and 2005, CIB Marine took a number of actions to improve the financial condition of the company and corrected the weaknesses which were identified in the credit administration process. During 2006 and 2007, the company continued to take actions to improve its financial condition with a particular emphasis on strengthening business development and continuing to reduce operating costs. During this time, CIB Marine sold or closed certain of its subsidiary bank branches to further improve the operating efficiency of its branch network.

Additional Information

See Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (which includes discussion of the Company’s Capital Plan in the liquidity section) and Supplementary Data inPart II of this Form 10-K for more details regarding certain of the above described items.

3

Markets Served

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine served the following geographic markets or regions through its banking subsidiaries. Information on these banks as of December 31, 2007 and the markets they served is set forth in the following table: 

Bank	Geographic Market/Region		Operated Since		Banking Facilities		Assets		Deposits
							(Dollars in millions)
Central Illinois Bank		Central Illinois		1987		13	$	473.2	$	364.8
Marine Bank		Milwaukee, Indianapolis, Phoenix		1997		6	$	409.0	$	301.8
Citrus Bank		Florida’s southeastern coast		2001		6	$	123.4	$	102.6

Nonbank Subsidiaries

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had one wholly-owned operating nonbanking subsidiary, CIB Marine Information Services, Inc. CIB Marine also had four wholly-owned nonbanking subsidiaries that had ceased operations and are in the process of winding down: Mortgage Services, Inc.; CIB Marine Capital, LLC; MICR, Inc. n/k/a Everett Tech, Inc.; and CIB Construction, LLC.

CIB Marine Information Services, Inc.

CIB Marine Information Services, Inc. (“CIB Marine Information”), an Illinois corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of CIB Marine, was incorporated in August 1990 as CIB Data Processing Services, Inc. In 2002, CIB Marine changed the name of the subsidiary to CIB Marine Information Services, Inc. This subsidiary was organized to provide in-house data processing services, coordinate computer equipment leases and purchases, license banking software, and coordinate operation of CIB Marine software. During the fourth quarter of 2007, in the Company’s continuing effort to improve operating efficiencies, significant portions of CIB Marine and subsidiary banks’ data processing was outsourced to Jack Henry and Associates Inc. Following this migration to outsourced service bureau support of core customer accounting systems, CIB Marine Information restructured its staffing and now is focused on a more limited support of company-owned and operated technology and information networks. As of December 31, 2007, CIB Marine Information had nine full-time equivalent employees. CIB Marine Information does not separately own any facilities.

Mortgage Services, Inc.

CIB Marine sold the operations of Mortgage Services, Inc. (“MSI”), a mortgage origination and mortgage brokerage services company, in the third quarter of 2004. CIB Marine is in the process of winding down the remaining affairs of MSI. CIB Marine continues to offer residential mortgage loans through its subsidiary banks.

CIB Marine Capital, LLC

In April 2001, CIB Marine established CIB Marine Capital, LLC (“CIB Marine Capital”), a Wisconsin limited liability company. CIB Marine Capital provided leveraged financing, including mezzanine loans. Typically, the collateral coverage on these loans was insufficient to secure a senior debt position. These loans were, by their nature, inherently riskier than senior debt position loans. During 2003, CIB Marine ceased to offer new loans through CIB Marine Capital and began winding down its affairs, including the sale and collection of outstanding loans. As of December 31, 2007, CIB Marine Capital had no loans outstanding, but collection efforts continue on previously charged-off loans.

MICR, Inc. (n/k/a Everett Tech, Inc.)

In November 2005, CIB Marine sold substantially all the assets and operations of MICR, Inc. (“MICR”) n/k/a Everett Tech, Inc. and changed its name to Everett Tech, Inc. MICR was a manufacturer of payment processing systems that one of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks had acquired from a borrower who was in default of its obligations, in lieu of foreclosure or other legal action. CIB Marine recognized a $0.2 million pretax gain on the sale. Since then, CIB Marine has been actively winding down the remaining affairs of MICR. At December 31, 2007, the majority of MICR’s net liabilities consisted of income taxes payable. The subsidiary was dissolved on January 8, 2008.

4

CIB Construction, LLC

In 2002, CIB Marine acquired through its wholly-owned subsidiary, CIB Construction, LLC ("CIB Construction"), 84% of Canron Corporation (“Canron”), a steel fabrication and erection company that had operations in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Canron was acquired from a borrower who was in default of its obligations and it is classified as an asset held for disposal. In September 2003, Canron commenced a voluntary liquidation and winding down of its affairs. At December 31, 2007, CIB Construction had $1.2 million in assets and $2.4 million in liabilities, including taxes due to its parent resulting from a tax sharing agreement. For more information on this company see Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Companies Held for Disposal, and Item 8, Note 7-Companies Held for Disposal and Discontinued Operations in Part II of this Form 10-K.

Management Support Services

In addition to the support services provided by its nonbank subsidiaries, CIB Marine, as a holding company, performs a significant portion of its subsidiaries’ back office services, including credit administration, treasury, and asset/liability management support services, accounting, finance, audit, operations, human resources, legal, marketing and advertising. CIB Marine believes it is more efficient to consolidate these services and that providing these services assures that its operating policies and procedures are consistent throughout the organization. This also enables CIB Marine to more efficiently manage the costs of these services than if these services were performed independently at each subsidiary. CIB Marine continues to evaluate opportunities to further reduce these costs and improve the efficiency of all operations. At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had 91 full-time equivalent employees at the holding company level, a majority of whom are providing the described services to CIB Marine’s subsidiaries.

Total Employees

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine and all of its bank and nonbank subsidiaries had a combined total of 258 full-time equivalent employees.

COMPETITION

The banking industry is highly competitive. CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks compete for loans, deposits and other financial services in their markets and surrounding areas. In addition to local, regional, and national banking competition in the markets it serves, CIB Marine competes with other financial institutions, money market and other mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage companies and other non-depository financial service companies, including certain governmental organizations which may offer subsidized financing at lower rates than those offered by CIB Marine. During 2007, certain economic conditions contributed to the competitive environment as credit market concerns impacted pricing decisions on specific loan and deposit products. During the second half of 2007, certificate of deposit pricing and other consumer core deposit pricing were at historically high costs compared to U.S. Treasury instruments. This has increased the pressure on net interest margin at CIB Marine and its competitors.

CIB Marine believes that its long-standing presence in the communities it serves and a commitment to local, personal service improves its ability to compete favorably in attracting retail and business customers.

Changes in federal and state laws have resulted in and are expected to continue to result in increased competition. The reductions in legal barriers to the acquisition of banks resulting from the implementation of interstate banking laws, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLBA”), and other recent and proposed changes, are expected to continue to further stimulate competition in the markets in which CIB Marine operates, although it is not possible to predict the extent or timing of such increased competition.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

Bank holding companies and financial institutions are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. Any significant change in the banking laws and regulations applicable to CIB Marine or its banking subsidiaries could materially impact CIB Marine’s operations or change the manner in which it conducts business. Federal and state regulation of financial institutions is intended primarily for the protection of the federal deposit insurance funds and depositors.

5

CIB Marine is a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and is regulated by the Federal Reserve Board (“the FRB”). Citrus Bank is a national bank and its primary regulator is the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”). CIB Marine’s other bank subsidiaries have the FDIC as their primary federal regulator, and are also regulated by the state banking regulator for the state in which they are chartered: the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banks and Real Estate (“DBRE”) or the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions (“WDFI”).

CIB Marine and its nonbank subsidiaries are subject to examination by the FRB. The state banking regulators and FDIC periodically conduct examinations of CIB Marine’s state bank subsidiaries and nonbank subsidiaries that are under their regulatory authority. The OCC periodically conducts examinations of Citrus Bank, and the FDIC may also conduct special examinations of this bank.

The bank regulatory agencies have extensive oversight authority relative to the depository holding companies and institutions that they supervise. They have been granted wide-ranging enforcement and supervision powers and exercise this authority to ensure that depository holding companies and institutions under their jurisdiction operate on a safe and sound basis and in compliance with applicable laws. Holding companies and institutions that fail to conduct their operations on a safe and sound basis or in compliance with applicable laws can be compelled by the regulators to change the way they do business and may be subject to regulatory enforcement actions, including encumbrances imposed on their operations. Currently, CIB Marine is subject to a Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. See Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Regulatory Matters in Part II of this Form 10-K.

The following discussion summarizes the material elements of the regulatory framework applicable to CIB Marine and its subsidiaries. It is not meant to be a complete discussion of all the federal and state banking statutes and regulations applicable to CIB Marine and its subsidiaries. To the extent this discussion describes statutory and regulatory provisions it is qualified in its entirety by reference to those provisions.

Expansion Activities

The BHCA requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the FRB before merging with another bank holding company, acquiring substantially all the assets of any bank or bank holding company, or acquiring directly or indirectly any ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank. The BHCA also prohibits a bank holding company, with particular exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging in any business other than that of banking, managing and controlling banks, or furnishing services to banks and their subsidiaries. Bank holding companies may, however, engage in some businesses and activities determined by the FRB to be closely related to banking or managing and controlling banks.

Interstate Banking and Branching

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act enacted in 1994 permits an adequately capitalized and adequately managed bank holding company, with FRB approval, to acquire banking institutions located in states other than the bank holding company’s home state without regard to whether the transaction is prohibited under state law. In addition, national banks and state banks with different home states are permitted to merge across state lines, with the approval of the appropriate federal banking agency, unless the home state of a participating banking institution has passed legislation prior to June 1, 1997 that expressly prohibits interstate mergers. De novo interstate branching is permitted if the laws of the host state so authorize.

6

Capital Standards

The federal banking agencies impose risk-based capital requirements and guidelines on bank holding companies and banks to provide for a measure of capital that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking organization’s operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets and those recorded as off-balance sheet items. A bank holding company or bank’s capital, in turn, is divided into two tiers:

• core capital (commonly referred to as Tier 1 capital), which generally includes common equity, qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, and for bank holding companies, a limited amount of qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries (including junior subordinated debentures net of investment in trust, provided that not more than 25% of the qualifying Tier 1 capital may consist of junior subordinated debentures, net of investment in trust), less goodwill and certain other intangible assets; and

• supplementary capital (commonly referred to as Tier 2 capital), which includes, among other items, perpetual preferred stock not meeting the Tier 1 definition, mandatory convertible securities, and limited amounts of subordinated debt and reserves for credit losses.

Bank holding companies and banks are currently required to maintain Tier 1 capital equal to at least 4% and “total capital” (the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) equal to at least 8% of its total risk-weighted assets, including certain off-balance-sheet items such as unused lending commitments and standby letters of credit.

The FRB, the FDIC and the OCC have also adopted rules to incorporate market and interest rate risk components into their risk-based capital standards. Amendments to the risk-based capital requirements, incorporating market risk for institutions with substantial trading activities or institutions where the federal banking regulator deems it necessary for safety and soundness, became effective January 1, 1998. Under these market risk requirements, capital must be allocated to support the amount of market risk related to a financial institution’s ongoing trading activities. The market risk requirements do not presently apply to CIB Marine or any of its bank subsidiaries.

The FRB also requires bank holding companies to maintain a minimum “leverage ratio” of Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets of 3% if the bank holding company has the highest regulatory rating and meets certain other requirements, or 3% plus an additional cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points if the bank holding company does not meet these requirements. Federal regulators have imposed similar requirements on banks.

The regulators may set capital requirements higher than the minimums noted above for banks and bank holding companies whose circumstances warrant it. For example, bank holding companies experiencing or anticipating significant growth may be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without significant reliance on intangible assets. Furthermore, the FRB has indicated that it will consider a “tangible Tier 1 capital leverage ratio” (deducting all intangibles) and other indications of capital strength in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities.

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine and its banking subsidiaries were in compliance with these minimum capital requirements. For more information about the regulatory capital levels of CIB Marine and its bank subsidiaries, see Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Capital and Item 8, Note 14-Stockholders’ Equity in Part II of this Form 10-K.

Central Illinois Bank and Marine Bank entered into Cease and Desist Orders (“Orders”) with the FDIC and their applicable state banking regulators and CIB Marine entered into a Written Agreement (“Agreement”) with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, each effective May 29, 2004. Pursuant to the Orders, the banks agreed to maintain a minimum Tier 1 capital level of 8% while these Orders were in effect. In April 2005, as a result of improvements at the bank, the Order at Marine Bank was terminated and replaced with a Memorandum of Understanding (“Marine Memorandum”), which was entered into in March 2005. Pursuant to the Marine Memorandum, the bank agreed to maintain minimum Tier 1 capital levels of 8%, correct loan administration deficiencies, reduce concentrations and problem credits and not declare or pay cash dividends without regulatory approval. In January 2007, the Order at Central Illinois Bank was terminated and replaced with a Memorandum of Understanding (“Central Illinois Memorandum” and, together with the Marine Memorandum, the “Memoranda”). The Central Illinois Memorandum provided that Central Illinois Bank will (a) develop a plan to lower the bank’s risk position in loans classified as “substandard”; (b) develop and implement a plan to improve earnings; (c) maintain minimum Tier 1 capital level of 8%; and (d) obtain regulatory approval prior to purchasing any loan pools in excess of $3 million. In the fourth quarter of 2007 the Central Illinois Memorandum was terminated, and in the first quarter of 2008 the Marine Memorandum was terminated. For additional information relative to the Memoranda and Agreement, see Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Regulatory Matters and Item 8, Note 14-Stockholders’ Equity in Part II of this Form 10-K.

7

For several years, the U.S. bank regulators have been preparing to implement a new framework for risk-based capital adequacy developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, sometimes referred to as “Basel II.” In November 2007, the U.S. bank regulators issued final rules, effective April 2008, to implement the most advanced approach under Basel II for banks with over $250 billion in assets or over $10 billion in foreign exposure. The regulators have also said they will propose rules permitting smaller financial institutions, such as CIB Marine and its bank subsidiaries, to choose between the current method of calculating risked-based capital (“Basel I”) and the “standardized” approach under Basel II. The standardized approach under Basel II would lower risk weightings for certain categories of assets (including mortgages) from the weightings reflected in Basel I, but would also require an explicit capital charge for operational risk, which is not required by Basel I. The requirement to maintain a minimum leverage ratio, which is not risk-based, remains in effect.

Holding Company Obligations

Under current FRB policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its subsidiary banks and to maintain resources adequate to support each subsidiary bank. This support may be required at times when the bank holding company may not have the resources to provide it. In addition, Section 55 of the National Bank Act permits the OCC to order the pro rata assessment of a shareholder of a national bank whose capital has become impaired. If a shareholder, like CIB Marine, failed within three months to pay that assessment, the OCC could order the sale of the shareholder’s stock to cover the deficiency. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank would be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.

Cross-Guarantees Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”), when two or more insured depository institutions are under common control, each of those depository institutions may be liable for any loss incurred, or expected to be incurred, by the FDIC in connection with the default of any of the others. Each also may be liable for any assistance the FDIC provides to the other institutions. “Default” means the appointment of a conservator or receiver for the institution. Thus, any of CIB Marine’s banking subsidiaries could be liable to the FDIC if the FDIC were to suffer a loss in connection with any of CIB Marine’s other banking subsidiaries. This cross-guarantee liability for a loss at a commonly controlled institution would be subordinated in right of payment to deposit liabilities, secured obligations, any other general or senior liability, and any obligation subordinated to depositors or other general creditors, other than obligations owed to any affiliate of the depository institution (with certain exceptions).

Safety and Soundness Guidelines

The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines to assist in identifying and addressing potential safety and soundness concerns before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines establish operational and managerial standards relating to internal controls, information systems, and internal audit systems; loan documentation; credit underwriting; interest rate exposure; asset growth and asset quality; and compensation, fees, and benefits. In addition, the federal banking agencies have adopted safety and soundness guidelines for asset quality and for evaluating and monitoring earnings to ensure that earnings are sufficient for the maintenance of adequate capital and reserves.

Prompt Corrective Action

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) requires the federal banking regulators to take prompt corrective action in respect to FDIC insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. FDICIA establishes five capital tiers: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” A depository institution’s capital tier depends upon how its capital levels compare to various relevant capital measures and certain other factors established by regulation. Under applicable regulations, an FDIC insured bank is defined as well capitalized if it maintains a leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average total assets of at least 5%, a total capital ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets, including certain off-balance sheet items, of at least 10% and a Tier 1 capital ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6% and is not otherwise in a “troubled condition” as specified by its appropriate federal regulatory agency.

8

A bank is generally considered to be adequately capitalized if it is not defined as well capitalized but meets all of its minimum capital requirements: a leverage ratio of 4% or greater (or 3% or greater if it receives the highest composite examination rating by its examiners, subject to appropriate federal banking agency guidelines); a total capital ratio of 8% or greater; and a Tier 1 capital ratio of 4% or greater. A bank will be considered undercapitalized if it fails to meet any minimum required measure, significantly undercapitalized if it is significantly below such measure and critically undercapitalized if it maintains a level of tangible equity capital equal to or less than 2% of total assets. A bank may be reclassified to be in a capitalization category that is next below that indicated by its actual capital position if it receives a less than satisfactory examination rating by its examiners with respect to its assets, management, earnings, or liquidity that has not been corrected, or it is determined that the bank is in an unsafe or unsound condition or engages in an unsafe or unsound practice. The federal banking agencies, however, may not treat a significantly undercapitalized institution as critically undercapitalized unless its capital ratio actually warrants such treatment.

FDICIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution, including payment of dividends or paying any management fee to its holding company, if the depository institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. Undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan to become adequately capitalized. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized.

Under FDICIA, a bank that is not well capitalized is generally prohibited from accepting or renewing brokered deposits and offering interest rates on deposits significantly higher than the prevailing rate in its normal market area or nationally depending upon where the deposits are solicited; in addition, “pass-through” insurance coverage may not be available for certain employee benefit accounts.

A number of additional requirements and restrictions may apply to significantly undercapitalized depository institutions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks. Critically undercapitalized depository institutions may be restricted from making payments of principal and interest on subordinated debt and are subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator.

At December 31, 2007, pursuant to FDIC regulations in 12 C.F.R. Part 325, all of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks were classified as well capitalized.

In addition to measures taken under the prompt corrective action provisions, banking organizations may be subject to potential enforcement actions by the federal banking agencies for unsafe or unsound practices in conducting their business for violations of any law, rule, regulation, or any condition imposed in writing by the agency or any written agreement with the agency. These enforcement actions may include the appointment of a conservator or receiver for a bank, the issuance of a cease and desist order that can be judicially enforced, the termination of a bank’s deposit insurance, the imposition of civil money penalties, the issuance of directives to increase capital, the issuance of formal and informal agreements, the issuance of removal and prohibition orders against officers, directors and other institution-affiliated parties, and the enforcement of such actions through injunctions or restraining orders based upon a judicial determination that the agency would be harmed if equitable relief was not granted. Finally, pursuant to an interagency agreement, the FDIC may examine without the express permission of the institution’s primary regulator any institution that has a substandard regulatory examination score or is considered undercapitalized.

Dividend Restrictions

The FRB’s policy regarding dividends is that a bank holding company should not declare or pay a cash dividend which would impose undue pressure on the capital of its subsidiary banks or would be funded only through borrowing or other arrangements that might adversely affect a bank holding company’s financial position. The FRB believes that a bank holding company should not initiate or continue cash dividends on its common stock unless its net income is sufficient to fully fund each dividend and its prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with its capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Pursuant to the Agreement entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, CIB Marine has agreed not to declare or pay dividends without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Board of Governors. In addition, as a result of the agreement entered into with its regulator, CIB Marine has elected to defer all interest payments on its junior subordinated debentures subsequent to December 31, 2003. However, this deferral period is only permitted for five years, and will begin expiring in the first quarter of 2009. According to the terms of its junior subordinated debt agreements, during the deferral period, CIB Marine may not pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire, or make a liquidation payment on its stock. See Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Regulatory Matters in Part II of this Form 10-K for further information on the Agreement. Also, see the liquidity discussion and capital plan in Item 7 of this Form10-K for further information on CIB Marine’s strategies to become current on its junior subordinated debentures interest payments.

9

CIB Marine’s ability to pay any dividends to its shareholders depends in large part on the ability of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks to pay it dividends. Federal law prohibits the payment of any dividends that would cause a bank to become undercapitalized. The ability of state-chartered commercial banks to pay dividends is also subject to restrictions primarily under the banking laws of the state under which the bank is organized. In the case of CIB Marine’s state-chartered banks, the laws of Illinois and Wisconsin are applicable. The ability of Citrus Bank to pay dividends is subject to OCC regulations applicable to national banks. In addition, the FRB and the banks’ regulators have the authority to prohibit CIB Marine and its subsidiary banks from paying dividends, depending upon CIB Marine’s and the banks’ financial condition, if such payment is deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.

Federal Deposit Insurance

As FDIC-insured institutions, each of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks is required to pay deposit insurance premiums based on the risk each poses to the FDIC insurance funds. In 2007, the FDIC had the authority to raise or lower assessment rates on insured deposits in order to achieve certain designated reserve ratios in the insurance funds and to impose special additional assessments. The FDIC had adopted a premium rate schedule, which provided for an assessment range of 0.05% to 0.43% of domestic deposits, depending on the capital category and supervisory category to which it is assigned. The FDIC’s risk-based insurance assessment system was amended by the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act in 2006. Under implementing regulations effective for 2007, each insured bank is placed in one of four risk categories based on its level of capital, supervisory ratings and other risk measures, including debt ratings for large institutions, and its insurance assessment rate is determined by its risk category. There is currently a 38 basis point spread between the highest and lowest assessment rates, so that banks classified by the FDIC in Risk Category I are subject in 2008 to an insurance assessment of five to seven basis points (according to the FDIC’s assessment of the bank’s strength), and banks classified by the FDIC in Risk Category IV are subject to an insurance assessment rate of 0.43%. For the fourth quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008, both Central Illinois Bank and Marine Bank were classified in Risk Category II with an assessment rate of 10 basis points and Citrus Bank was classified in Risk Category I with an assessment rate range of five to seven basis points.

The FDIC is authorized to terminate an institution’s deposit insurance upon a finding by the FDIC that the institution’s financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or has violated any applicable rule, regulation, order or condition enacted or imposed by the institution’s regulatory agency. The termination of deposit insurance for CIB Marine’s banks would have a material adverse effect on CIB Marine. In addition to its insurance assessment, each insured institution is subject to quarterly debt service assessments in connection with bonds issued by the government corporation that financed the federal savings and loan bailout.

In October 2006, the FDIC Board of Directors approved a one-time assessment credit. This credit, totaling $0.6 million for CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks, has been recorded as a credit against regular FDIC insurance premium expense beginning in January 2007 and will continue to be recorded until the credit is exhausted. Of the $0.6 million, $0.2 million was used to offset the FDIC insurance premium during 2007.

Restrictions on Affiliate Transactions

Transactions between CIB Marine, its subsidiary banks and its nonbank subsidiaries are subject to a number of restrictions. Federal law imposes restrictions and limitations on CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks from making extensions of credit to, or the issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on behalf of, CIB Marine or other affiliates, the purchase of, or investment in, stock or other securities thereof, the taking of such securities as collateral for loans, and the purchase of assets of CIB Marine or other affiliates. Such restrictions and limitations prevent CIB Marine or other affiliates from borrowing from the subsidiary banks unless the loans are secured by marketable obligations of designated amounts. Further, such secured loans and investments by the subsidiary banks to or in CIB Marine or to or in any other non-banking affiliate are limited, individually, to 10% of the respective subsidiary bank’s capital, allowance for loan losses and surplus, and such secured loans are limited in the aggregate to 20% of the respective subsidiary bank’s capital, allowance for loan losses and surplus. All such transactions must be on terms that are no less favorable to the bank subsidiary than those that would be available from nonaffiliated third parties. Moreover, some state banking laws, like those in Illinois, impose restrictions on affiliate transactions similar to those imposed by federal law. Certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks have engaged in transactions with affiliates, including the making of loans to purchase CIB Marine stock. In connection with the Order issued against CIB Marine’s bank subsidiary Central Illinois Bank (see Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Regulatory Matters in Part II of this Form 10-K for further information), CIB Marine’s Illinois bank subsidiary was cited by bank regulators for failure to comply with federal restrictions on transactions with affiliates relating to lending transactions involving the stock of CIB Marine. FRB policies also forbid the payment by bank subsidiaries of management fees which are unreasonable in amount or exceed the fair market value of the services rendered or, if no market exists, actual costs plus a reasonable profit.

10

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks had $1.0 million in outstanding principal balances on loans secured or partially secured by CIB Marine stock. Specific reserves on these loans were $0.3 million. While these loans were secured by CIB Marine stock, the borrowers did not use the proceeds to acquire the stock.

The restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their related interests (collectively referred to herein as “insiders”) contained in the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O apply to all federally insured institutions. These restrictions include limits on loans to one borrower and conditions that must be met before such a loan can be made. There is also an aggregate limitation on all loans to insiders and their related interests. These loans cannot exceed the institution’s total unimpaired capital and surplus, and the FDIC may determine that a lesser amount is appropriate. Insiders are subject to enforcement actions for knowingly accepting loans in violation of applicable restrictions. Regulation O institutions are not subject to the prohibitions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on certain loans to insiders.

Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending

CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks are subject to the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) and various fair lending requirements and reporting obligations. The CRA generally requires federal banking agencies to evaluate whether financial institutions are meeting the credit needs of their local communities, including low-and moderate-income neighborhoods and to rate such institutions and publicly disclose such ratings. State and federal agencies also examine financial institutions compliance with fair lending laws. A bank may be subject to substantial penalties and corrective measures for a violation of certain fair lending laws. Federal banking agencies are also authorized to take compliance with such laws and a bank’s CRA rating into consideration when regulating and supervising other activities of a bank holding company and its banks, including expansionary activities. As of the date of its most recent examination, each of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks had a CRA rating of at least satisfactory.

Compliance with Consumer Protection Laws

CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks are subject to many federal consumer protection statutes and regulations including the Truth in Lending Act, Truth in Savings Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, Fair Housing Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. Among other things, these acts:

· require banks to disclose credit terms in meaningful and consistent ways;

· prohibit discrimination against an applicant in any consumer or business credit transaction;

· prohibit discrimination in housing-related lending activities;

· regulate the manner in which banks must deal with customers and certain information about customers;

11

· require banks to collect and report applicant and borrower data regarding loans for home purchases or improvement projects;

· require lenders to provide borrowers with information regarding the nature and cost of real estate settlements;

· prohibit certain lending practices and limit escrow account amounts with respect to real estate transactions; and

· prescribe possible penalties for violations of the requirements of consumer protection statutes and regulations.

Privacy and Security

The GLBA also establishes a minimum federal standard of financial privacy by, among other provisions, requiring banks to adopt and disclose privacy policies with respect to consumer information and setting forth certain rules with respect to the disclosure to third parties of consumer information. CIB Marine has adopted and disseminated its privacy policies pursuant to the GLBA. Regulations adopted under the GLBA set standards for protecting the security, confidentiality and integrity of customer information, and require notice to regulators, and in some cases, to customers, in the event of security breaches. A number of states have adopted their own statutes requiring notification of security breaches. In addition, the GLBA requires the disclosure of agreements reached with community groups that relate to the CRA, and contains various other provisions designed to improve the delivery of financial services to consumers while maintaining an appropriate level of safety in the financial services industry.

USA PATRIOT Act of 2001

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and its implementing regulations (“Patriot Act”) were enacted and implemented for the purpose of strengthening the ability of the U.S. Government to intercept and obstruct terrorism by, among others, increasing the power of the U.S. government to obtain access to information and to investigate a broad range of criminal activities. The Patriot Act expanded the definition of money laundering to include terrorism, terrorism support and foreign corruption, and increases the civil and criminal penalties for money laundering offenses. The Patriot Act further applies certain anti-money laundering measures to United States bank accounts of foreign persons; prohibits financial institutions from establishing, maintaining, administering or managing a correspondent account with a foreign shell bank; provides for certain forfeitures of funds deposited in United States interbank accounts by foreign banks; provides the Department of Treasury with regulatory authority to ensure that certain accounts are not used to hide the identity of customers transferring funds and to impose additional reporting requirements with respect to money laundering activities; provides standards for verifying customer identification at account opening; and sets forth rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering. The impact of the Patriot Act on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and wide ranging. Regulatory authorities have increased compliance monitoring activities and have levied significant fines and sanctions on many firms in the financial industry. No fines or sanctions have been levied on CIB Marine.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes”) addresses corporate governance and accounting oversight matters. Sarbanes required the creation of a five member oversight board appointed by the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that sets standards for accountants and has investigative and disciplinary powers; prohibits accounting firms from providing various forms of service to public audit clients, such as certain consulting services; requires accounting firms to rotate partners working with public clients every five years; expands disclosure of corporate operations and internal controls; requires certification of financial statements by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of public companies; increases penalties and forfeitures for financial crimes or failing to report events having a material effect on the financial statements or operations of a public company; and enhances controls on and reporting of insider trading. CIB Marine is required to provide management’s report on internal controls over financial reporting in this report, as required by Section 404 of Sarbanes; however, since it is neither a large accelerated filer nor an accelerated filer for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, its registered public accounting firm does not need to provide an attestation report with respect to such internal controls.

12

Exchange Act

CIB Marine’s stock is registered with the SEC. Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), CIB Marine is subject to the information, reporting, proxy solicitation, insider trading, corporate governance and other requirements and restrictions of the Exchange Act.

Future Legislation

Various legislation is from time to time introduced in Congress and state legislatures with respect to the regulation of financial institutions. Such legislation may change the banking statutes and the operating environment of CIB Marine and its banking subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. CIB Marine cannot determine the ultimate effect that potential legislation, or implementing regulations, if enacted, would have upon the financial condition or results of operations of CIB Marine or its banking subsidiaries.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

CIB Marine files various reports with the SEC. The reports include the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. CIB Marine makes all SEC filings available without charge to the public on its web site at http://www.cibmarine.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filed.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Forward-Looking Statements

CIB Marine has made statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the discussion of CIB Marine’s capital plan set forth in Item 7 of Part II of this Form 10-K, that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. CIB Marine intends these forward-looking statements to be subject to the safe harbor created thereby and is including this statement to avail itself of the safe harbor. Forward-looking statements are identified generally by statements containing works and phrases such as “may”, “project”, “are confident”, “should be”, “predict”, “plan”, “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements reflect CIB Marine’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance, which are subject to many uncertainties and factors relating to CIB Marine’s operations and the business environment, which could change at any time. Financial information contained in this Form 10-K for 2008 is unaudited.

Forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and CIB Marine’s actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such results to differ from the results discussed in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the risk factors set forth below.

Risk Factors

The following discussion sets forth certain material risks that CIB Marine believes could have a material adverse impact on its financial condition and results of operations. Additional risks that are not currently known to CIB Marine, or that it currently believes to be immaterial, may also have a material effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

CIB Marine has suffered large losses in recent years and may not be able to execute itsstrategic plan and return to profitability.

CIB Marine has incurred net losses in each of the five years ended through December 31, 2007. Although CIB Marine has developed and implemented strategies to improve its profitability in the future, there can be no assurance that these strategies will be successful. CIB Marine’s strategic plans are dependent on its ability to attract and retain borrowing customers, commercial loan officers and core deposits, all of which have been negatively impacted as a result of losses and a weakened financial condition. If CIB Marine is unable to execute its strategic plans and return to profitability, it will have a material impact on its business, results of operations and financial condition. The inability to return to profitability may require CIB Marine to sell bank subsidiaries, reduce the size of bank subsidiaries and/or reduce staff. There can be no assurance that if CIB Marine is required to sell assets, it will be able to do so on acceptable terms. Regulators could take further action against CIB Marine in the event it does not return to profitability.

13

CIB Marine is subject to liquidity risk and has long-term obligations on whichit has deferred interest payments.

Liquidity risk is the potential that CIB Marine will be unable to meet its obligations as they come due or capitalize on growth opportunities as they arise, because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain funding on a timely basis, at a reasonable cost and within acceptable risk tolerances. Liquidity is required to fund credit obligations to borrowers, withdrawals by depositors, repayment of debt when due or called, operating expenses and capital expenditures, among other things.

Liquidity is derived primarily from bank-issued deposit growth and retention; principal and interest payments on loans; sale, maturity and prepayment of investment securities; net cash provided from operations; and access to other funding sources.

CIB Marine’s liquidity can be affected by a variety of factors, including general economic conditions, market disruption, operational problems affecting third parties or CIB Marine, unfavorable pricing, competition, CIB Marine’s credit rating and any regulatory restrictions. In addition, some of the borrowing sources customarily utilized by CIB Marine have been restricted or unavailable due to noncompliance with certain asset quality, earnings, and capital maintenance debt agreements.

CIB Marine exercised the right to defer interest payments on its $61.9 million junior subordinated debentures and, as a result, the related trusts deferred distributions on the $60.0 million trust preferred securities beginning in the first quarter of 2004. Interest accrues on each of the deferred payments at the coupon rate of the debentures, creating a compounding effect for the interest expense of the debentures. This causes interest expense for the debentures to increase each year and become an increasing percentage of total interest expense and total average interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, both total interest expense and total average earning assets have decreased over the prior three years making the interest expense burden of the debentures even greater. Accrued and unpaid interest on the $61.9 million of junior subordinated debentures totaled $30.3 million and $21.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. CIB Marine has the right to defer interest payments until the first quarter of 2009. If CIB Marine does not develop and implement a strategy for refinancing or becoming current on distributions on the trust preferred securities before that time, the holders of the trust preferred securities may be entitled to a number of remedies that could include sales of businesses and/or assets of CIB Marine or a change in control of the company to ensure the protection of the trust preferred securities holders. It is uncertain what specific legal remedies would be available to holders of the trust preferred securities or what the actions of the regulatory agencies involved would be in the event of a default on the trust preferred securities. The liquidity discussion in Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides the CIB Marine’s capital plan which includes their strategy for becoming current on distributions on the trust preferred securities before the end of the first quarter of 2009.

CIB Marine’s results of operations are subject to general and regional economicconditions, which are beyond its control.

CIB Marine’s success depends to a large degree on the general economic conditions of the diverse geographic markets it serves. Local economic conditions have a significant impact on the generation of commercial, commercial real estate, and real estate loans; the ability of borrowers to repay these loans; and the value of the collateral securing these loans. Adverse changes in the economic conditions of the markets in which CIB Marine’s Banks operate could also negatively impact the financial results of the Company’s operations. For example, adverse changes in these factors could lead to reduced interest income and an increase in the provision for loan losses.

14

CIB Marine operates in a highly regulated environment and is subject tosupervision and examination by various federal and state regulatory agencies.

As a bank holding company, CIB Marine is regulated separately by the Federal Reserve Board, and each of its bank subsidiaries is regulated separately by various federal and state banking regulators. This regulation is primarily intended to protect CIB Marine’s customers and their deposits rather than its shareholders. In addition, CIB Marine’s common stock is registered under the Exchange Act and CIB Marine is subject to regulation by the SEC and to public reporting requirements.

As of January 9, 2008, no agreements, orders or memoranda were in place between the three CIB Marine bank subsidiaries and their respective regulatory agencies. CIB Marine, however, remains under an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago which continues to impose certain restrictions and reporting requirements including, but not limited to:

· Restrictions on dividend payments and redemption of shares of CIB Marine stock without regulatory approval;

· Adoption of a comprehensive plan to improve earnings;

· Development of a plan to correct and prevent violations of banking laws and regulations related to affiliate transactions.

CIB Marine is subject to litigation.

CIB Marine is currently, and may from time to time be, involved in litigation in which it has been named as a defendant as a result of its operations. In particular, CIB Marine and certain of its current and former officers and directors are defendants in a purported class action lawsuit alleging violations of the federal securities laws.

Claims asserted against CIB Marine, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm CIB Marine’s reputation, which could have a material effect on its business operating results and financial condition. Judgments or settlements relating to pending or future litigation which exceed CIB Marine’s insurance coverage or claims outside the scope of insurance coverage could also have a material impact on CIB Marine’s business, operating results and financial condition and its ability to obtain future insurance coverage. In addition, operating costs are impacted through additional fees for legal services to support defending CIB Marine's position or providing information related to litigation.  CIB Marine is also subject to mandatory indemnification of its current and former officers and directors under certain circumstances. For a description of current legal proceedings, see Item 3-Legal Proceedings in Part I of this Form 10-K.

CIB Marine’s loan portfolio contains concentrations of credit to oneborrower, related borrowers or borrowers in the same industry, which createsspecial credit risks.

Credit risk is the risk that one or more of CIB Marine’s borrowers will not be able to repay some or all of their obligations to CIB Marine. Credit risk is inherent in CIB Marine’s business. Concentrations of credit occur when the aggregate amount owed by one borrower, a related group of borrowers, or borrowers within an industry or group represent a relatively large percentage of the total credit extended by CIB Marine. Although each loan in a concentration may be of sound quality, concentrations of credit create special risks that are not present when the same loan amount is extended to a group of unrelated borrowers. Loans concentrated in one borrower depend, to a large degree, upon the financial capability and character of the individual borrower. Loans made to a related group of borrowers can be susceptible to a domino effect if financial problems are experienced by one or a few members of that group. Concentrations of loans within or dependent upon an industry are also impacted by external economic conditions and market acceptance, which are risk factors that can equally affect all members of that industry.

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had one secured borrowing relationship (loans to one borrower or a related group of borrowers) that exceeded 25% of stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2007 the total outstanding commitments on this borrowing relationship, including lines of credit not fully drawn, were equal to 36.9% of equity and 3.7% of total loans, and the principal drawn and outstanding was $6.9 million. As of December 31, 2007 all loans within this borrowing relationship are current. At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had total borrowings within five industries or industry groups that exceeded 25% of its stockholders’ equity as of that date. Of the five industries or industry groups, the largest concentration at December 31, 2007, consisted of loans to commercial real estate developers, which had a total outstanding balance of approximately $174.6 million, or 29% of total loans, and 279% of stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine also had fixed rate home equity loan pools with a combined balance outstanding of $73.0 million and loan loss reserves allocated to these pools of $5.3 million. Beginning in the third quarter of 2007, the quality of the loan pool purchases deteriorated in part due to the deterioration in the housing markets and the sudden and significant tightening of credit standards and reduction in credit availability in the mortgage finance markets.

15

CIB Marine’s profitability is dependent upon its ability to manage net interestincome.

CIB Marine’s primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on interest-earnings assets (consisting primarily of loans and securities) and the interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities (consisting primarily of deposits and other borrowings). The level of net interest income is a function of the average balance of interest-earning assets, the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities, and the spread between the yield on such assets and the cost of such liabilities. These factors are influenced by CIB Marine’s ability to attract loans and core deposits and the pricing and mix of these and other interest-earnings assets and interest-bearing liabilities which, in turn, are impacted by such external factors as the local economy, competition for loans and deposits, monetary policy, and market interest rates.

The level of net interest income is influenced by movements in such rates of interest, and the pace at which such movements occur. If the interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities increase at a faster pace than the interest rates on interest-earning assets, the result could be a reduction in net interest income and with it, a reduction in earnings. CIB Marine’s net interest income and earnings would be similarly impacted if the interest rates on interest-earning assets decline more quickly than the interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, such changes in interest rates could have an effect on the ability to originate loans and attract and retain deposits; the fair value of financial assets and liabilities; and the average life of loan and securities portfolios.

CIB Marine is subject to credit risk.

CIB Marine is exposed to the risk that third parties that owe it money, securities, or other assets will not repay their obligations. Credit risk arises anytime CIB Marine commits, invests or otherwise extends funds through contractual agreements, whether reflected on or off the balance sheet. These parties may default on their obligations due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons.

The Company’s credit risk is concentrated in its loan portfolio. Credit risk is affected by a variety of factors including credit-worthiness of the borrower, the sufficiency of underlying collateral, the enforceability of third-party guarantees, changing economic and industry conditions and concentrations of credit by loan type, terms or geographic area, changes in the financial condition of the borrower or other party, and by credit and underwriting policies.

CIB Marine has established an allowance for loan loss which represents management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in its loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance involves a high degree of subjectivity. If CIB Marine’s assumptions and judgments are incorrect, its allowance may not be sufficient and additional provisions may need to be made. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of the allowance and may require an increase in the allowance or loan charge-offs. Increases in the allowance or charge-offs could have a material adverse effect on CIB Marine’s financial condition and results of operations.

There is not presently an active market for shares of CIB Marine common stock and, therefore, you may be unable to sell any shares of common stock in the event that you need a source of liquidity.

There currently is no active trading market for shares of CIB Marine common stock. A public trading market in CIB Marine common stock having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the market of willing buyers and sellers of CIB Marine’s common stock at any time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which CIB Marine has no control. In the event an active market for CIB Marine common stock does not develop, you may be unable to resell your shares of common stock at or above the price per share which you acquired your shares or at any price.

16

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The following table provides information relating to the material real properties owned or leased by CIB Marine and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007. CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks lease or sublease office space to CIB Marine and to its nonbank subsidiaries.

Location	Owned or Leased		Date Opened or Acquired
SUBSIDIARY BANKS:
CENTRAL ILLINOIS BANK FACILITIES
Sidney, Illinois		Owned		09/87
Champaign, Illinois		Owned		09/88
Urbana, Illinois		Owned		03/90
Arrowsmith, Illinois		Owned		10/91
Champaign, Illinois (Midtown)		Owned		04/94
Monticello, Illinois		Leased		05/95
Danville, Illinois		Owned		08/95
Decatur, Illinois		Leased		10/95
Peoria, Illinois		Leased		09/97
East Peoria, Illinois		Owned		10/97
Bloomington, Illinois		Owned		10/00
Peoria, Illinois (Knoxville)		Leased		12/01
Peoria, Illinois (Grand Prairie)		Leased		04/03
MARINE BANK FACILITIES
Pewaukee, Wisconsin		Leased		02/98
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin		Leased		05/98
Franklin, Wisconsin		Leased		08/00
Indianapolis, Indiana (Emerson Way)		Leased		09/98
Carmel, Indiana		Leased		08/00
Scottsdale, Arizona		Leased		10/01
CITRUS BANK FACILITIES
Vero Beach, Florida		Owned		04/90
Sebastian, Florida		Owned		02/93
Barefoot Bay, Florida		Owned		09/96
North Miami Beach, Florida		Leased		12/01
Coral Gables, Florida		Leased		04/03
Boca Raton, Florida		Leased		04/03
NONBANK SUBSIDIARIES:
CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.
Champaign, Illinois		Leased		10/99
Gurnee, Illinois		Leased		04/05
Chicago, Illinois		Leased		01/05
Naperville, Illinois		Leased		02/06

None of the properties owned by CIB Marine or its subsidiaries are subject to encumbrances material to the operations of CIB Marine and its subsidiaries. CIB Marine considers the conditions of its properties to be generally good and adequate for the current needs of the businesses of it and its subsidiaries.

17

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Material pending litigation, other than that of a routine nature in the ordinary course of business, is as follows:

In August 2003, Keith Burchett, a shareholder of CIB Marine and a borrower of CIB Marine’s former subsidiary CIB Bank (Hillside, Illinois) (“CIB-Chicago”), commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against CIB Marine, Central Illinois Bank, CIB-Chicago and two of their now former directors and/or officers for damages arising out of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations relative to the financial condition of Canron and its principal shareholder by defendants to induce the plaintiff to borrow money from CIB-Chicago and make a $0.5 million investment in Canron. Plaintiff asserts claims for fraud and shareholder remedies. The shareholder alleges the defendants violated lending regulations causing a decline in the plaintiff’s investment in CIB Marine. Plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages, requests an order requiring CIB Marine and the banks to repurchase his CIB Marine shares of stock at fair value, and other forms of relief. While the outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend this action. Central Illinois Bank has been removed as a defendant in subsequent amended complaints filed by the plaintiff. On November 30, 2004, CIB Marine sold CIB-Chicago. On January 11, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the litigation. The court has not ruled on this motion.

In June 2004, Central Illinois Bank commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Champaign County, Illinois, against John C. Hadley and Mary Lydia Hadley, CIB Marine’s largest individual shareholders at the time, for damages arising out of the Hadleys’ default in December 2003 of certain loan obligations (the “State Litigation”) and subsequently obtained a confession of judgment. The loans approximate $9.7 million plus interest and attorneys fees and were secured by CIB Marine stock and the accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and other personal property of the borrowers and their restaurant supply and coin businesses. In December 2004, the Hadleys consented to the entry of an order for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois (the “Bankruptcy Case”). The Hadleys stayed the State Litigation and, in the first quarter of 2006, the Hadleys filed a counterclaim against Central Illinois Bank in the dischargeability adversary proceeding that sought to recover $35.0 million in actual damages and punitive damages for the alleged loss or substitution by Central Illinois Bank of certain rare coins and collectibles which the Hadleys alleged were pledged to the bank as collateral, sought to recover certain alleged preferential transfers and sought to equitably subordinate the bank’s claim to those of unsecured creditors. Central Illinois Bank and the Hadleys have settled these matters with the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. According to the settlement agreement, the adversary complaint and counterclaims in the Bankruptcy Court and the State Litigation were dismissed with prejudice and without admitting any fault or liability; the parties exchanged mutual general releases of claims among the Hadleys, Central Illinois Bank and its parent and affiliated corporations, preserving only the Hadleys’ claims as members of a putative plaintiff class in an action currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin entitled Dennis Lewis, et al. v. CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc., et al., Case No. 05-C-1008 or as individual plaintiffs in an “opt out” action against some or all of the same parties alleging substantially the same claims; and Central Illinois Bank discharged, waived, released and assigned its claims in the Bankruptcy Case to the Hadleys’ bankruptcy estate, returned to the Hadleys’ bankruptcy estate all collateral security held by Central Illinois Bank and paid the bankruptcy estate $1.75 million in the first quarter of 2007. CIB Marine recorded a $1.75 million contingent liability expense in the first quarter of 2006 related to the settlement.

In June 2004, John C. Ruedi, a former employee of CIB Marine, filed an action against CIB Marine and “Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.” in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial District, Champaign County, Illinois for rescission or damages, including punitive damages, in connection with plaintiff’s October 1, 2002 exercise of options issued by CIB Marine to acquire 36,688 shares of CIB Marine common stock at various exercise prices. Plaintiff claims that but for CIB Marine’s and Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.’s alleged fraudulent concealment of material facts regarding the financial condition of CIB Marine he would not have exercised his options. Plaintiff also seeks to recover from Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc. and CIB Marine in excess of $40,000 allegedly due Plaintiff pursuant to a purported memorandum providing for the payment of an incentive to Plaintiff in connection with his employment. In March 2005, Plaintiff amended his complaint to add the former President and CEO of CIB Marine as a defendant based upon claims of alleged fraudulent concealment. Claims filed in the action against CIB Marine’s independent registered public accounting firm KPMG LLP (hereinafter “KPMG”) and a now retired partner of KPMG were voluntarily dismissed by the Plaintiff. CIB Marine filed a motion to dismiss several of Plaintiff’s claims and answered the others denying liability. That motion to dismiss was denied and CIB Marine answered the remaining counts against it, denying liability. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment seeking recovery of $40,000 from CIB Marine on his incentive payment claim. This motion was denied. All discovery had been stayed in this action by an order of the Federal Court in the Lewis case described later in this section. Plaintiff had filed a motion in the Lewis case to vacate the discovery stay in this case, which CIB Marine and the other defendants in the Lewis case opposed. When defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings was denied in the Lewis case on March 3, 2008, the Court denied the motion to vacate the stay of discovery as moot. While the ultimate outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend the action.

18

On June 3, 2005, a first consolidated complaint was filed by Dennis Lewis, a shareholder, and other alleged shareholders of CIB Marine in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Urbana Division, against CIB Marine, certain of its current and former officers and directors and KPMG. The filing consolidated two actions that had been filed in January 2005: one filed by Lewis in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Urbana Division and another filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Peoria Division by Elaine Sollberger, a purported shareholder, whose claims were voluntarily dismissed in connection with the consolidation and have not been reasserted in the consolidated complaint. Plaintiffs sought to maintain the action as a class action on behalf of all persons who purchased common stock of CIB Marine between April 12, 1999 and April 12, 2004, claiming violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by CIB Marine and other defendants and liability of certain defendants other than CIB Marine and KPMG under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as controlling persons. The substance of the complaint is that the financial condition of CIB Marine was overstated with the result that members of the purported class acquired their CIB Marine stock at inflated prices. Plaintiffs seek money damages, interest, attorneys’ fees and costs. The federal court in Urbana, Illinois granted the motion of CIB Marine and several other defendants to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where the action is now pending.

All defendants moved to dismiss the action on various grounds. On October 12, 2006 the court denied CIB Marine’s motion to dismiss, granted in part the motions to dismiss filed by the individual defendants and granted the motion to dismiss filed by KPMG. CIB Marine and the individual defendants filed answers to the pending complaint denying any liability. An additional person has moved to intervene as a plaintiff in the action. In light of a recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that addressed the pleading standards that must be satisfied by the plaintiff in a case such as this one, on July 16, 2007 CIB Marine and the individual defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alternative, a motion for reconsideration of the ruling on the motion to dismiss, seeking dismissal of the action on the ground that the plaintiffs have not satisfactorily pleaded one of the essential elements of their cause of action. On March 3, 2008, the Court denied that motion.

On November 10, 2006, plaintiffs filed a further amended complaint as to KPMG, which KPMG moved to dismiss. On August 13, 2007, the court granted KPMG’s motion and dismissed the action as to it.

As a result of the filing of the initial motions to dismiss, all discovery in this action was stayed automatically. Plaintiffs moved to vacate that stay of discovery, which all defendants opposed based on KPMG’s pending motion to dismiss the further amended complaint filed by plaintiffs against KPMG. In granting KPMG’s motion to dismiss, the court noted the pendency of the motion for judgment on the pleadings described above and ruled that the stay of discovery remained in place. Plaintiffs filed a separate motion for a limited lift of the stay of discovery, which CIB Marine and the individual defendants opposed in their response filed on September 11, 2007. In denying the motion for judgment on the pleadings as described above, the Court denied the motions to vacate the stay as moot, i.e., with the denial of the motion for judgment on the pleadings discovery may now proceed.

CIB Marine intends to vigorously contest certification of any class and to otherwise vigorously defend this action. The ultimate outcome of this action cannot be determined at this time.

In April 2005, James Fasano and Thomas Arundel, shareholders of CIB Marine and borrowers of CIB-Chicago, commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against CIB Marine, CIB-Chicago and two of their now former directors and/or officers for damages arising out of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations relative to the financial condition of Canron and its principal shareholder to induce the plaintiffs to borrow $0.5 million from CIB-Chicago and invest it in Canron. Plaintiffs assert claims for fraud and shareholder remedies. The shareholder alleges the defendants violated lending regulations which caused a decline in the plaintiffs’ investment in CIB Marine. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages, request an order requiring CIB Marine and the bank to repurchase their CIB Marine shares of stock at fair value and other forms of relief. While the outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend this action. On November 30, 2004, CIB Marine sold CIB-Chicago. On January 11, 2008, plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the litigation. The Court has not ruled on this motion.

19

In December 2003, CIB-Chicago acquired the title to a commercial office building that was being converted into residential condominiums. The property was acquired through a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Settlement Agreement (“DIL Agreement”) from a borrower who was in default on its obligation. The property was included in foreclosed properties at December 31, 2003. Pursuant to the DIL Agreement, CIB-Chicago acquired the property subject to the first lien held by an unaffiliated financial institution and assumed the borrower’s financial obligation relating to that first lien. At December 31, 2003, the assumed financial obligation was reported as an outstanding non-recourse mortgage note payable. During the second quarter of 2004, CIB-Chicago transferred all of its rights, title and interest in the property, along with the borrower’s obligation under the related mortgage note, to the first lien holder. CIB-Chicago transferred the property based upon its evaluation that the amount of additional funds necessary to complete the project was greater than the financial benefits and risks associated therewith. The property was transferred without any further liability or obligation to the first lien position holder and CIB-Chicago reserved its legal rights to pursue the borrower and guarantors. The transfer to the first lien holder resulted in no additional gain or loss to CIB Marine. During 2003, CIB Marine charged-off $41.7 million of the loan to its allowance for loan loss with respect to this borrowing relationship and also recorded a $1.5 million market value write down on the property. In July 2004, CIB-Chicago commenced litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against the borrower, guarantors and their related interests for collection of the losses incurred by CIB Marine based upon state law claims of breach of agreements, fraud, conversion and other theories of recovery, including Federal RICO violations. In November 2004, CIB-Chicago assigned the loans and claims related to this development to CIB Marine in conjunction with the sale of CIB-Chicago. In April 2005, the United States District Court dismissed the RICO claim and, as a result, lacked jurisdiction over the state law claims. In April 2005, CIB Marine commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against the defendants on the state law claims. On February 1, 2008, the Court dismissed the action against one of the guarantors on the grounds that CIB-Chicago was precluded from pursuing collection from the guarantor until the first lienholder was paid in full pursuant to the language of a restructuring agreement entered into by CIB-Chicago, the first lienholder and the guarantor. CIB Marine intends to appeal the dismissal. In the event that there are any recoveries with respect to these loans and claims, CIB Marine has agreed to pay the purchaser of CIB-Chicago ten percent of any recovery after collection costs. To date, CIB Marine has not made any recoveries with respect to such loans and claims.

On April 20, 2006, Mark A. Sindecuse filed an action in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division (St. Louis) against CIB Marine, Dean M. Katsaros (“Katsaros”), a former director of CIB Marine, and Katsaros & Associates, Inc. The complaint, as amended, purported to assert common law causes of action against CIB Marine for fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with plaintiff’s purchases of common stock of CIB Marine in private placements in 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998. Plaintiff sought compensatory damages in excess of $2 million and unspecified punitive damages. After a motion to dismiss the amended complaint resulted in the dismissal of the negligent misrepresentation claims against it, CIB Marine filed an answer denying any liability to plaintiff and a motion for summary judgment on the remaining claim. On August 28, 2007, following Plaintiff’s withdrawal of two of the three remaining claims against Katsaros, the Court granted CIB Marine and Katsaros summary judgment on the sole remaining claim and dismissed the lawsuit. On September 24, 2007, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the judgment to the United State Court of Appeal for the Eighth Circuit. The appeal is fully briefed, with no argument currently scheduled.

CIB Marine and the individual defendants in the Ruedi, Burchett, Fasano/Arundel and Lewis cases described above, are insureds under a policy that on its face purports to provide coverage for those cases, including advancement of reimbursement for the costs of defense (payment of which by the insured reduces the remaining coverage under the policy), which include attorneys’ fees, subject to a retention. The insurer had reserved all rights and notified CIB Marine and the other insureds of potential grounds to deny coverage. After CIB Marine exhausted the retention under that policy, the insurer paid substantially all of the costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individual defendants in the Ruedi and Lewis cases through February 17, 2006 subject to its reservation of rights to seek reimbursement (and through March 31, 2007 in the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases). The insurer informed the insureds of its intention to terminate any further funding of the costs of defense.

Negotiations ensued and CIB Marine and the insurer discussed an arrangement in which the insurer would pay 35% of the costs of defense of the Ruedi and Lewis cases incurred by CIB Marine and the individual defendants and CIB Marine would pay the remaining 65% of those reasonable costs. The parties negotiated the terms of their agreement, which was reflected in a written agreement accepted by the insurer, but was not executed by the parties. Pending addressing open issues with regard to expanding the scope of this agreement to include the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases, the insurer informed the insureds that it would not sign the agreement regarding the Lewis and Ruedi cases. The insurer contends that the act of plaintiff’s counsel in Lewis providing an affidavit from Ruedi to the court in connection with one of the pending motions regarding vacating the stay of discovery gives the insurer grounds to invoke an exclusion under the policy that applies when an insured under the policy, which the insurer contends Ruedi is, assists a plaintiff, such as Lewis, in the prosecution of a case against other insureds, such as the Lewis case. Accordingly, the insurer has advised the insureds that it will no longer pay any of the costs of defense of the Lewis case. CIB Marine understands that this refusal also applies to any judgment that may be entered against any insured in Lewis.

20

CIB Marine is considering its options in response to this position of the insurer. With respect to the individual defendants, the payment of defense costs by CIB Marine is pursuant to the provision of its by-laws that mandates advancing defense costs of directors and officers under certain circumstances and subject to a full reservation of rights under the insurance policy by both parties. The advances to individuals are subject to repayment by the individual defendants if it is ultimately determined, as provided in the by-laws and applicable Wisconsin law, that they are not entitled to be indemnified. The agreement with the insurer provided that either CIB Marine or the insurer could terminate the funding arrangement under certain circumstances. In the event of termination, CIB Marine would be responsible for all of the reasonable costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individual defendants.

With respect to the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases, after CIB Marine exhausted retention under that policy, the insurer paid substantially all of the costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individuals through March 31, 2007, subject to its reservation of rights. On March 14, 2007, the insurer informed the insureds of its intention to terminate funding of all of the costs of defense in those actions on or after April 1, 2007 and proposed a funding arrangement comparable to that discussed with respect to the Ruedi and Lewis cases. No agreement has been reached with respect to post-April 1, 2007 funding of defense costs in the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases. With respect to the individual defendants, the payment of these defense costs by CIB Marine is being made pursuant to the provision of its by-laws that mandates advancing defense costs of directors and officers under certain circumstances and subject to a full reservation of rights under the insurance policy by both parties. The advances to individuals are subject to repayment by the individual defendants if it is ultimately determined, as provided in the by-laws and applicable Wisconsin law, that they are not entitled to be indemnified.

It is not possible to estimate the amount or timing of the defense costs that will be paid by CIB Marine from and after February 17, 2006 in the Ruedi and Lewis cases or in the other cases described above. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ from those described in the preceding forward-looking statement and affect the amount and timing of the expenses referred to with respect to the Ruedi and Lewis cases: (1) the scope of discovery that is allowed by the court; (2) the extent, if any, to which the Lewis case is allowed to proceed as a class action; (3) the scope of discovery pursued by the plaintiffs (and the timing and substance of the court’s rulings on any objections thereto by defendants); (4) the extent to which CIB Marine and the individual defendants and their respective counsel are able to coordinate their defense of the action and in particular minimize duplication of activities in defense of the case; (5) the final determination by the insurer as to the amounts it is prepared to pay pursuant to the policy referenced above; (6) CIB Marine’s determination of what costs of defense are “reasonable” within the meaning of its by-laws and any claims made by individual defendants whose costs of defense may be rejected in whole or in part on that ground; and (7) the extent to which any individual defendant whose costs of defense are advanced by CIB Marine is ultimately required to repay those costs and, if so, the ability of that person to make repayment.

21

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

CIB Marine did not submit any matters to a vote of its shareholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.

Supplemental Item. Executive Officers of Registrant.

The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of all executive officers of CIB Marine at March 1, 2008, the period that each has held positions with CIB Marine, and a brief account of each officer’s business experience during at least the past five years. Under CIB Marine’s by-laws, executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors, and each executive officer holds office until his/her successor has been duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of his/her death, resignation or removal.

Name and Age	Office and Experience
John P. Hickey, Jr. (60)	Mr. Hickey has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CIB Marine since March 2007, Director of CIB Marine since May 2007, and Director, President and CEO of Marine Bank since April 2006. Prior to joining Marine Bank, Mr. Hickey was Senior Vice President of Business Banking at Guaranty Bank in 2006; and from 2001 to 2005 held senior management positions with Marsh McLennan, first as Managing Director of the Western region, then as the Managing Director of a substantial business segment of the company.
Edwin J. Depenbrok (51)	Mr. Depenbrok was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2008. Mr. Depenbrok, through his consulting firm, dbrok group, LLC (dbrok), was engaged as a consultant by CIB Marine in February 2007 to provide financial management services. Mr. Depenbrok founded and has been employed by dbrok since 2001.
Charles J. Ponicki (57)	Mr. Ponicki has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer since January 2008, and was Wisconsin Market President of Marine Bank from September 2007 to December 2007. From 2006 to September 2007, Mr. Ponicki provided acquisition sourcing and due diligence, credit policy and governance, and de novo formation consulting services to banks. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Ponicki was Executive Vice President of Business Banking at Cole Taylor Bank.
Daniel J. Rasmussen (42)	Mr. Rasmussen has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of CIB Marine since April 2005. He was Vice President and Senior Attorney of CIB Marine from 1999 to 2005.
Michael L. Rechkemmer (58)	Mr. Rechkemmer has been Executive Vice President of CIB Marine since July 1999 and Chief Operations Officer since April 2000. He was interim President and CEO of CIB Marine’s former Chicago banking subsidiary, CIB Bank (Hillside, Illinois) (“CIB-Chicago”) from March 2004 to November 2004.
Patrick J. Straka (41)	Mr. Straka has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Economist of CIB Marine since February 1999. He was Vice President, Investment Officer and General Auditor of CIB Marine from 1995 to February 1999.

22

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ANDISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Although there is currently no active trading market for shares of CIB Marine’s common stock, the common stock  is quoted on the Pink Sheets under the trading symbol “CIBH.PK.” Pink Sheet quotations do not reflect retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily reflect actual transactions. The following table sets forth the high and low closing quotations for CIB Marine common stock for the past two years as quoted on the Pink Sheets. 

	OTCBB Bid Quotations
Fiscal Quarter Ended	High		Low
March 31, 2006	$	5.50	$	4.75
June 30, 2006		5.50		4.55
September 30, 2006		5.05		4.50
December 31, 2006		5.02		4.80
March 31, 2007		5.07		4.60
June 30, 2007		4.65		3.35
September 30, 2007		4.10		2.45
December 31, 2007		3.20		1.05

As of February 29, 2008, there were approximately 1,256 holders of record of CIB Marine common stock.

CIB Marine has not paid cash dividends on its common stock. As a result of recent losses, CIB Marine does not currently have any intentions to pay a cash dividend. Further, CIB Marine is restricted by the regulators from paying cash dividends. Also, as a result of the agreement entered into with its regulator, CIB Marine has elected to defer all interest payments on its junior subordinated debentures subsequent to December 31, 2003. According to the terms of its junior subordinated debt agreements, during the deferral period, CIB Marine may not pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire, or make a liquidation payment on its stock. Restrictions on CIB Marine’s ability to pay dividends and the ability of its subsidiaries to transfer funds to it for the payment of dividends are discussed under, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and also Item 8, Note 14-Stockholders’ Equity in Part II of this Form 10-K. CIB Marine will periodically evaluate its financial position to determine whether to pay cash dividends in the future.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth CIB Marine’s selected consolidated financial data. The following information should be read in conjunction with Item 8-Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presented in Part II of this Form 10-K. In the fourth quarter of 2005, CIB Marine sold the assets and operations of MICR and is in the process of winding down its remaining affairs. In the fourth quarter of 2004, CIB Marine sold Hillside Investors, including its banking subsidiary, CIB-Chicago which accounted for 46% of CIB Marine’s consolidated assets at December 31, 2003. The assets and operations of MSI were sold in the third quarter of 2004 and Commercial Finance was sold in the second quarter of 2004. Discontinued operations for 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes the results of CIB Construction (including Canron), MSI and MICR. In all other years presented, discontinued operations includes CIB Construction (including Canron), MSI, MICR, CIB-Chicago, and Commercial Finance.

TOTAL COMPANY-CONTINUING AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

	At or for the Year Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Selected Statements of Operations Data
Interest and dividend income	$	62,694		$	61,509		$	59,849		$	69,979		$	96,663
Interest expense		40,067			38,242			34,795			37,287			46,578
Net interest income		22,627			23,267			25,054			32,692			50,085
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		6,413			(4,384	)		(8,669	)		17,432			50,506
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses		16,214			27,651			33,723			15,260			(421	)
Noninterest income(1)		3,050			4,542			2,933			3,678			5,113
Noninterest expense		34,472			42,131			51,008			52,729			51,348
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(15,208	)		(9,938	)		(14,352	)		(33,791	)		(46,656	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		3			(99	)		(1,208	)		(5,240	)		1,906
Loss from continuing operations		(15,211	)		(9,839	)		(13,144	)		(28,551	)		(48,562	)
Discontinued operations:
Pretax income (loss) from discontinued operations		417			660			3,850			15,618			(92,147	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,023	)		99			2,367			4,414			(3,061	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		1,440			561			1,483			11,204			(89,086	)
Net loss	$	(13,771	)	$	(9,278	)	$	(11,661	)	$	(17,347	)	$	(137,648	)
Common Share Data
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.72	)	$	(1.56	)	$	(2.66	)
Discontinued operations		0.08			0.03			0.08			0.61			(4.87	)
Net loss	$	(0.75	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.64	)	$	(0.95	)	$	(7.53	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.72	)	$	(1.56	)	$	(2.66	)
Discontinued operations		0.08			0.03			0.08			0.61			(4.87	)
Net loss	$	(0.75	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.64	)	$	(0.95	)	$	(7.53	)
Dividends		—			—			—			—			—
Book value per share	$	3.29		$	3.91		$	4.32		$	4.83		$	5.94
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic		18,333,779			18,333,779			18,333,779			18,245,884			18,286,550
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted		18,333,779			18,333,779			18,333,779			18,245,884			18,286,550
Financial Condition Data
Total assets	$	1,005,787		$	997,584		$	1,138,428		$	1,385,908		$	3,186,237
Loans		595,861			522,724			515,544			746,615			2,360,041
Allowance for loan losses		(20,706	)		(20,906	)		(24,882	)		(29,551	)		(109,872	)
Securities		316,321			345,602			493,409			379,024			637,356
Deposits		745,590			739,784			867,700			1,178,488			2,821,218
Deposits of branches held for sale		—			55,365			66,991			—			—
Borrowings, including junior subordinated debentures and guaranteed trust preferred securities		159,473			91,510			94,108			87,916			200,734
Stockholders’ equity		60,306			71,613			79,182			92,892			108,523
Financial Ratios and Other Data
Performance ratios:
Net interest margin (2) (9)		2.40	%		2.29	%		2.06	%		2.22	%		3.12	%
Net interest spread (3) (9)		1.58			1.59			1.56			1.96			2.81
Noninterest income to average assets(4)(9)		0.33			0.47			0.52			1.29			0.59
Noninterest expense to average assets (9)		3.52			3.99			4.06			3.27			2.93
Efficiency ratio (5) (9)		132.37			148.38			161.75			94.20			81.20
Loss on average assets (6)		(1.41	)		(0.88	)		(0.93	)		(0.62	)		(3.94	)
Loss on average equity (7)		(20.11	)		(12.78	)		(13.51	)		(20.06	)		(63.02	)
Asset quality ratios:
Nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total loans		3.18	%		4.24	%		8.17	%		8.41	%		6.58	%
Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total assets		2.02			2.23			3.96			4.75			6.15
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		3.47			4.00			4.83			3.96			4.66
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing		109.37			94.37			59.06			47.08			70.72
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans		1.14			(0.08	)		(0.67	)		3.85			3.81
Capital ratios:
Total equity to total assets		6.00	%		7.18	%		6.96	%		6.70	%		3.41	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		17.26			20.95			21.37			17.47			7.19
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		10.62			14.32			15.33			13.11			5.03
Leverage capital ratio		7.92			9.51			9.20			5.63			4.23
Other data:
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)(8)		258			301			359			482			898
Number of banking facilities		25			30			37			41			57

(1) Noninterest income includes pretax gains on investment securities of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. There were no pretax gains on investment securities in 2007, 2006, 2004 and 2003.

(2) Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, to average interest-earning assets. For 2003 the effective tax rate used to calculate the tax-equivalent basis was 35%. In the future, CIB Marine does not expect to realize all the tax benefits associated with tax-exempt assets due to substantial losses and at December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 no U.S. federal or state loss carryback potential remains. Accordingly, the 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 interest income on tax-exempt earning assets has not been adjusted to reflect the tax-equivalent basis. If 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 had been shown on a tax-equivalent basis of 35%, the net interest margin would have been 2.43%, 2.34%, 2.13% and 2.28%, respectively.

(3) Net interest rate spread is the yield on average interest-earning assets less the rate on average interest-bearing liabilities.

(4) Noninterest income to average assets excludes gains and losses on securities.

(5) The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, plus noninterest income, excluding gains and losses on securities.

(6) Loss on average assets is net loss divided by average total assets.

(7) Loss on average equity is net loss divided by average common equity.

(8) Does not include the employees of Canron and MICR which are manufacturing companies held for disposal. These companies had aggregate full-time equivalent employees of 2 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, 37 in 2004, and 49 in 2003.

(9) Ratio is calculated based on the total income/expense and average assets/liabilities for continuing and discontinued operations.

23

The following table sets forth CIB Marine’s selected consolidated financial data excluding those companies included in discontinued operations.

CIB MARINE-CONTINUING OPERATIONS ONLY:

	At or for the Year Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Selected Statements of Operations Data
Interest and dividend income	$	62,694		$	61,509		$	59,849		$	69,979		$	96,663
Interest expense		40,067			38,242			34,795			37,287			46,578
Net interest income		22,627			23,267			25,054			32,692			50,085
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		6,413			(4,384	)		(8,669	)		17,432			50,506
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses		16,214			27,651			33,723			15,260			(421	)
Noninterest income(1)		3,050			4,542			2,933			3,678			5,113
Noninterest expense		34,472			42,131			51,008			52,729			51,348
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(15,208	)		(9,938	)		(14,352	)		(33,791	)		(46,656	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		3			(99	)		(1,208	)		(5,240	)		1,906
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(15,211	)	$	(9,839	)	$	(13,144	)	$	(28,551	)	$	(48,562	)
Common Share Data
Basic-loss from continuing operations	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.72	)	$	(1.56	)	$	(2.66	)
Diluted-loss from continuing operations	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.72	)	$	(1.56	)	$	(2.66	)
Dividends		—			—			—			—			—
Book value per share	$	3.29		$	3.91		$	4.32		$	4.83		$	5.94
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic		18,333,779			18,333,779			18,333,779			18,245,884			18,286,550
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted		18,333,779			18,333,779			18,333,779			18,245,884			18,286,550
Financial Condition Data
Total assets	$	1,003,936		$	993,472		$	1,132,515		$	1,371,043		$	1,704,149
Loans		595,259			522,624			515,544			746,615			1,231,412
Allowance for loan losses		(20,706	)		(20,906	)		(24,882	)		(29,551	)		(54,382	)
Securities		316,321			345,602			493,409			379,024			353,754
Deposits		745,590			739,784			867,700			1,178,488			1,515,574
Deposits of branches held for sale		—			55,365			66,991			—			—
Borrowings, including junior subordinated debentures and guaranteed trust preferred securities		159,473			91,510			94,108			87,916			123,074
Stockholders’ equity		60,306			71,613			79,182			92,892			108,523
Financial Ratios and Other Data
Performance Ratios:
Net interest margin (2)		2.39	%		2.29	%		2.06	%		2.21	%		3.02	%
Net interest spread (3)		1.57			1.59			1.57			1.91			2.70
Noninterest income to average assets (4)		0.31			0.43			0.20			0.24			0.29
Noninterest expense to average assets		3.54			4.01			4.05			3.49			2.87
Efficiency ratio (5)		134.25			151.50			184.60			144.98			90.85
Loss on average assets (6)		(1.56	)		(0.94	)		(1.04	)		(1.89	)		(2.72	)
Loss on average equity (7)		(22.21	)		(13.56	)		(15.23	)		(33.02	)		(22.23	)
Asset Quality Ratios:
Nonaccrual loans restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total loans		3.18			4.24	%		8.17	%		8.41	%		4.56	%
Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total assets		2.02			2.24			3.98			4.79			3.47
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		3.48			4.00			4.83			3.96			4.42
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing		109.37			94.37			59.06			47.08			96.85
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans		1.14			(0.08	)		(0.67	)		4.06			2.04
Capital Ratios:
Total equity to total assets		6.01	%		7.21	%		6.99	%		6.78	%		6.37	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		17.26			20.95			21.54			17.53			13.38
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		10.62			14.32			15.45			13.16			10.33
Leverage capital ratio		7.92			9.51			9.20			9.08			8.10
Other Data:
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)		258			301			359			482			590
Number of banking facilities		25			30			37			41			41

(1) Noninterest income from continuing operations includes pretax gains on investment securities of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. There were no pretax gains on investment securities in 2007, 2006, 2004 and 2003.

(2) Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, to average interest-earning assets. For 2003 the effective tax rate used to calculate the tax-equivalent basis was 35%. In the future, CIB Marine does not expect to realize all the tax benefits associated with tax-exempt assets due to substantial losses and at December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 no U.S. federal or state loss carryback potential remains. Accordingly, the 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 interest income on tax-exempt earning assets has not been adjusted to reflect the tax-equivalent basis. If 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 had been shown on a tax-equivalent basis of 35%, the net interest margin would have been 2.43%, 2.34%, 2.13% and 2.29%, respectively.

(3) Net interest rate spread is the yield on average interest-earning assets less the rate on average interest-bearing liabilities.

(4) Noninterest income to average assets excludes gains and losses on securities.

(5) The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, plus noninterest income, excluding gains and losses on securities.

(6) Loss on average assets is net loss divided by average total assets.

(7) Loss on average equity is net loss divided by average common equity.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The financial condition and results of operations presented in the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements, selected financial data appearing elsewhere within this report, and management’s discussion and analysis are dependent upon CIB Marine’s accounting policies. The selection and application of these accounting policies involve judgments about matters that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.

Presented below are discussions of those accounting policies that management believes are the most important (“Critical Accounting Policies”) to the portrayal and understanding of CIB Marine’s financial condition and results of operations. These Critical Accounting Policies require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates or judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. See also Item 8, Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies In Part II of this Form 10-K.

24

Allowance for Loan Losses

CIB Marine monitors and maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb an estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. CIB Marine maintains policies and procedures that address the systems of controls over the following areas of the allowance: the systematic methodology used to determine the appropriate level of the allowance to provide assurances they are maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”); the accounting policies for loan charge-offs and recoveries; the assessment and measurement of impairment in the loan portfolio; and the loan grading system.

CIB Marine evaluates certain commercial loans individually for impairment as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, and SFAS No. 118, Accountingby Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosures. Loans evaluated individually for impairment include nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing, restructured loans and other loans identified by management as being impaired. The evaluations are based upon discounted expected cash flows from the loan or collateral valuations and all other known relevant information. If the evaluation shows that a loan is individually impaired, then a specific reserve is established for the amount of impairment. Loans, including all residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans which are not evaluated individually are assessed for impairment under SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (“SFAS 5”) with groups of loans that have similar characteristics.

For loans which are not individually evaluated, CIB Marine makes estimates of losses for groups of loans as required by SFAS 5. Loans are grouped by similar characteristics, including the type of loan, the assigned loan grade and the general collateral type. A loss rate reflecting the expected losses inherent in a group of loans is derived based upon estimates of expected default and loss rates for the group of loans in part based upon CIB Marine’s loss history and related migration analysis. The resulting estimate of losses for groups of loans are adjusted for relevant environmental factors and other conditions, including: borrower and industry concentrations; levels and trends in delinquencies, charge-offs and recoveries; changes in underwriting standards and risk selection; level of experience and ability of lending management; national and local economic conditions; and off-balance sheet positions.

The amount of estimated impairment for individually evaluated loans and the estimate of losses for groups of loans is added together for a total estimate of loan losses. The estimate of losses for groups of loans includes an assessment of a range of likely loss outcomes and the most likely outcome is used. This total estimate of loan losses is compared to the allowance for loan losses of CIB Marine as of the evaluation date. If the estimate of losses is greater than the allowance, an additional provision to the allowance would be made. If the estimate of losses is less than the allowance, the allowance would be reduced. CIB Marine recognizes the inherent imprecision in estimates of losses due to various uncertainties and variability related to the factors used to estimate loan losses. If different assumptions or conditions were to prevail and it is determined that the allowance is not adequate to absorb the new estimate of probable losses, an additional provision for loan losses would be made, which amount may be material to the consolidated financial statements.

Other Investments

Investments in limited partnerships and other equity investments which are not readily marketable are accounted for using the equity method when CIB Marine’s ownership is at least 3% in a limited partnership and 20% in a corporation, but not more than 50%. Investments not accounted for under the equity method are accounted for using the cost method. All other investments are periodically evaluated for impairments. If an investment is impaired, a loss is recognized. To determine whether an investment is impaired, CIB Marine looks to various indicators including recent transactions, if any, and the investee’s financial condition. During 2007, 2006, and 2005, CIB Marine recognized $0.7 million, zero and $0.1 million, respectively, of impairment losses on other investments. If different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, the carrying value of these investments may need to be further reduced and a loss recorded or previously recognized losses reversed and a gain recorded. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, other investments totaled $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, all of which are illiquid. See the other asset discussion for further information.

25

Assets of Companies Held for Sale or Disposal

Companies, and/or the operations of companies, which have met the accounting criteria of held for sale or disposal are carried at the lower of cost or fair market value less estimated selling costs. The valuations of such businesses are allocated to the assets and liabilities of the businesses. The asset groups are then periodically evaluated for impairment as required under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 144, based upon the estimated undiscounted cash flows of the asset group. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows of the asset group are not sufficient to recover the carrying value of the asset group, then the fair value of the asset group is determined using a discounted cash flow approach. If the fair value of the asset group is less than the carrying amount, a loss is recognized. Should future estimated cash flows be reduced or if applicable discount rates increase, then the carrying value of the asset groups may need to be reduced and a loss recorded. When these assets are acquired in full or partial satisfaction of a loan, any excess of the related loan balance over the fair value, less estimated selling cost, is charged as a loan loss against the allowance for loan losses. Net operating income or loss of the companies held for disposal and which meet the criteria as discontinued operations are included in gain or loss from discontinued operations. Once a decision is made to cease operations and liquidate the company, CIB Marine discontinues recording any future operating results of the company and records an impairment value, if any, based on the estimated liquidation value of the company’s net assets less costs to sell. The impairment loss is recorded as loss from discontinued operations. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine had three companies classified as held for sale/disposal; CIB Construction, including Canron, MICR and MSI. MICR and Canron were acquired in full or partial satisfaction of loans. The remaining assets and liabilities of these companies were included in assets/liabilities of companies held for sale/disposal. During the fourth quarter of 2005, CIB Marine sold substantially all the assets and operations of MICR. During the fourth quarter of 2004, CIB Marine sold substantially all the assets and liabilities of MSI. CIB Marine is in the process of winding down the remaining affairs of these companies. CIB Marine retained liability for repurchase obligations of MSI relative to certain mortgage loans as a result of external fraud and/or documentation issues. During the third quarter of 2003, the Boards of Directors of CIB Marine and of Canron authorized management to cease operating Canron and commence a wind down of its affairs and a voluntary liquidation of its assets. In August 2005, Canron authorized and began liquidation distributions to its shareholders.

Income Taxes

CIB Marine recognizes expense for federal and state income taxes currently payable as well as for deferred federal and state taxes for estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets, as well as loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon CIB Marine generating sufficient taxable income in either the carryforward or carryback periods to cover net operating losses generated by the reversal of temporary differences. A valuation allowance is provided by way of a charge to income tax expense if it is determined that it is not more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will be realized. If different assumptions and conditions were to prevail, the valuation allowance may not be adequate to absorb unrealized deferred taxes and the amount of income taxes payable may need to be adjusted by way of a charge or credit to expense. Furthermore, income tax returns are subject to audit by the IRS, state taxing authorities, and foreign government taxing authorities. Income tax expense for current and prior periods is subject to adjustment based upon the outcome of such audits. CIB Marine believes it has adequately accrued for all probable income taxes payable and provided valuation allowances for deferred tax assets where it has been determined to be not more likely than not that such assets are realizable. Accrual of income taxes payable and valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are estimates subject to change based upon the outcome of future events.

CIB Marine has entered into tax allocation agreements with its subsidiary entities included in the consolidated U.S. federal and unitary and combined state income tax returns, including U.S. operations of companies held for sale or disposal. These agreements govern the timing and amount of income tax payments required by the various entities.

Due to the significant losses incurred in 2006 and 2007 and the expectation of additional losses in 2008, management has determined that it is not more likely than not that the entire net deferred tax asset of $82.9 million at December 31, 2007, which includes the entire net deferred tax asset of companies held for sale or disposal of $6.0 million, will be realized. Therefore, a valuation allowance for the entire amount has been established, including net deferred tax assets of companies held for sale or disposal.

26

In June 2006, the FASB released FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. CIB Marine adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 and has completed the process of evaluating the effect of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. See Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Item 8, Part II of this Form 10-K for discussion of the effect the adoption of FIN 48 had on the consolidated financial statements.

INTRODUCTION

The following is a discussion and analysis of CIB Marine’s consolidated financial condition as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and its changes in financial condition and results of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. References in the discussion below to “CIB Marine” include CIB Marine’s subsidiaries unless otherwise specified. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10K.

OVERVIEW

During 2007, CIB Marine continued its expense management initiatives and took a number of steps to return to profitability including focusing on top-line revenue growth by expanding lending products, purchasing pools of prime home equity loans, attracting experienced commercial bankers and repositioning its funding sources from higher cost time deposits to lower cost short-term borrowings. In addition, CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks closed three branches and sold the deposits and equipment of two other branches. CIB Marine continued the wind down of the remaining business affairs of its discontinued operations, namely, MICR; MSI; and CIB Construction, including its subsidiary, Canron, which is in voluntary liquidation.

Net loss increased to $13.8 million in 2007 compared to a net loss of $9.3 million in 2006 and $11.7 million in 2005. Assets were $1.0 billion at both December 31, 2007 and 2006. At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine had three companies included in assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal: CIB Construction, including Canron; MICR; and MSI. The majority of the assets and operations of MICR and MSI were sold in prior periods and during 2007 CIB Marine continued to wind down the remaining business affairs of these two companies. Canron, a subsidiary of CIB Construction, continued to collect both on and off-balance sheet receivables and settle and resolve payables and claims through the voluntary liquidation process.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion relates to continuing operations unless otherwise noted.

Net Income

CIB Marine’s net loss increased $4.5 million from a net loss of $9.3 million in 2006 to a net loss of $13.8 million in 2007. Loss from continuing operations increased $5.4 million from $9.8 million in 2006 to $15.2 million in 2007. Net income from discontinued operations increased $0.9 million from $0.6 million to $1.4 million during the same respective periods. The increase was mainly due to a partial reversal of a tax exposure item related to a subsidiary CIB Marine sold in 2004. See the income tax discussion for further information on this exposure item.

Net loss from continuing operations was $15.2 million in 2007 compared to $9.8 million in 2006. The $5.4 million increase in net loss from continuing operations was primarily due to a $10.8 million change in the provision for credit losses from a negative $4.4 million in 2006 as compared to a provision of $6.4 million in 2007, and a $1.5 million decrease in net gain on sale of branches. The change in the provision for credit losses was driven by net charge-offs during 2007 as compared to net recoveries in 2006 and an increase in the provision for the fixed rate home equity pools CIB Marine purchased in 2006 and the first quarter of 2007. The decreases in net income resulting from the provision and branch sales was partially offset by a $7.7 million decrease in noninterest expense. The 2006 noninterest expense included a $1.8 million settlement expense related to the Hadley litigation and a $1.1 million impairment on securities. Additionally, compensation expense decreased $2.3 million in 2007 compared to 2006 due to management initiatives and the closing and sales of branches, and professional services decreased $1.1 million during the same period primarily due to reduced legal fees resulting from the settlement of litigation.

27

CIB Marine’s net loss was $9.3 million in 2006 compared to a net loss of $11.7 million in 2005. The decrease in net loss was primarily the result of a $3.3 million decrease in net loss from continuing operations, partially offset by a $0.9 million decline in the net income of discontinued operations. The decrease in discontinued operations was due to a $3.2 million decrease in pretax income from discontinued operations as CIB Marine continued the wind down of nonbank subsidiaries, partially offset by a $2.3 million decrease in income tax expense of discontinued operations primarily due to a change in the tax exposure reserves. Net loss from continuing operations was $9.8 million in 2006 compared to $13.1 million in 2005. The $3.3 million decrease in net loss from continuing operations was mainly due to a $5.2 million reduction in compensation and employee benefits as CIB Marine realized savings from its reduction in force program and the sale of certain branches, a $2.7 million gain on the sale of the deposits and assets of certain branches, a $0.5 million reduction in the net loss on securities and a $1.9 million decrease in the write down and losses on assets. These amounts were partially offset by a $4.3 million decrease in negative provision for credit losses during 2006 compared to 2005, a $1.8 million decline in net interest income and a $1.1 million decrease in income tax benefit.

The $0.5 million reduction in net loss on securities was mainly due to a $1.1 million impairment loss recognized in 2006 compared to a $2.0 million impairment loss offset by a $0.4 million gain on sale of securities in 2005. During the first quarter of 2007, CIB Marine decided to sell certain securities in its available for sale portfolio. When the decision was made to sell these securities, CIB Marine had not yet filed its 2006 or 2005 Forms 10-K. As a result of this decision, CIB Marine determined the full value of these securities at December 31, 2006 and 2005 would not be fully recovered and accordingly, recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss during both 2006 and 2005.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the most significant component of CIB Marine’s earnings. Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on deposits and other borrowed funds. Net interest margin is this difference expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. The amount of CIB Marine’s net interest income is affected by several factors, including interest rates and the volume and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Although CIB Marine can control certain of these factors, others, such as the general level of credit demand, fiscal policy and Federal Reserve Board monetary policy, are beyond CIB Marine’s control.

28

The following table sets forth information regarding average balances, interest income, or interest expense, and the average rates earned or paid for each of CIB Marine’s major asset, liability and stockholders’ equity categories. Interest income on tax-exempt securities has not been adjusted to reflect the tax equivalent basis, since CIB Marine does not expect to realize all of the tax benefits associated with these securities due to substantial losses incurred. There were no tax-exempt loans in 2007, 2006 or 2005. See Item 8, Note 21-Income Taxes in Part II of this Form 10-K for additional information.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2007								2006								2005
	Average Balance			Interest Earned/Paid		Average Yield/Cost			Average Balance			Interest Earned/Paid		Average Yield/Cost			Average Balance			Interest Earned/Paid		Average Yield/Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Securities:
Taxable	$	302,541		$	14,755		4.88	%	$	406,560		$	18,512		4.55	%	$	476,249		$	16,545		3.47	%
Tax-exempt (1)		1,569			81		5.16			3,520			161		4.57			10,551			509		4.82
Total securities		304,110			14,836		4.88			410,080			18,673		4.55			486,800			17,054		3.50
Loans held for sale		61			5		8.20			25			2		8.00			1,470			83		5.65
Loans (2)(3):
Commercial		62,004			4,683		7.55			50,234			3,873		7.71			114,331			6,769		5.92
Commercial real estate		408,064			30,558		7.49			418,907			30,790		7.35			457,125			30,147		6.59
Consumer		112,491			9,386		8.34			56,017			3,871		6.91			23,258			1,500		6.45
Total loans		582,559			44,627		7.66			525,158			38,534		7.34			594,714			38,416		6.46
Federal funds sold		58,802			3,226		5.49			79,731			4,300		5.39			133,585			4,296		3.22
Total interest-earning assets (1)		945,532			62,694		6.63			1,014,994			61,509		6.06			1,216,569			59,849		4.92
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		17,415								22,886								28,255
Premises and equipment (4)		10,087								12,572								14,910
Allowance for loan losses		(19,919	)							(22,968	)							(25,537	)
Receivables from sale of stock		(127	)							(176	)							(739	)
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		20,485								23,677								26,741
Total noninterest- earning assets		27,941								35,991								43,630
Total assets of continuing operations		973,473								1,050,985								1,260,199
Assets of companies held for disposal		—								—								306
Total assets	$	973,473							$	1,050,985							$	1,260,505
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	36,132		$	363		1.00	%	$	43,001		$	425		0.99	%	$	55,764		$	628		1.13	%
Money market		170,966			7,018		4.10			194,290			7,723		3.97			210,366			5,187		2.47
Other savings deposits		15,224			151		0.99			21,839			219		1.00			35,382			409		1.16
Time deposits (5)		466,151			22,163		4.75			507,013			20,880		4.12			641,274			20,773		3.24
Total interest-bearing deposits(4)		688,473			29,695		4.31			766,143			29,247		3.82			942,786			26,997		2.86
Borrowings-short-term		39,328			1,698		4.32			22,915			1,008		4.40			25,633			795		3.10
Borrowings-long-term		2,542			118		4.64			4,834			245		5.07			7,250			367		5.06
Junior subordinated debentures		61,857			8,556		13.83			61,857			7,742		12.52			61,857			6,636		10.73
Total borrowed funds		103,727			10,372		10.00			89,606			8,995		10.04			94,740			7,798		8.23
Total interest-bearing liabilities		792,200			40,067		5.06			855,749			38,242		4.47			1,037,526			34,795		3.35
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits(4)		75,670								91,668								112,470
Accrued interest and other liabilities		37,119								30,988								23,872
Total noninterest- bearing liabilities		112,789								122,656								136,342
Liabilities of continuing operations		904,989								978,405								1,173,868
Liabilities of companies held for disposal		—								—								306
Total liabilities	$	904,989							$	978,405							$	1,174,174
Stockholders’ equity		68,484								72,580								86,331
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	973,473							$	1,050,985							$	1,260,505
Net interest income and net interest spread (1)(6)				$	22,627		1.57	%				$	23,267		1.59	%				$	25,054		1.57	%
Net interest-earning assets	$	153,332							$	159,245							$	179,043
Net interest margin (1)(7)							2.39	%							2.29	%							2.06	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		1.19								1.19								1.17

(1) In the future, CIB Marine may not realize all of the tax benefits associated with tax-exempt assets due to substantial losses, and at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 no U.S. federal or state loss carryback potential remains. Accordingly, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis. If 2007, 2006 and 2005 had been shown on a tax-equivalent basis of 35%, the net interest margin would have been 2.43% , 2.34% and 2.13%, respectively.

29

(2) Loan balance totals include nonaccrual loans.

(3) Interest earned on loans includes amortized loan fees of $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

(4) Includes fixed assets and deposits of branches held for sale or sold during 2007 and 2006.

(5) Interest rates and amounts include the effects of derivatives entered into for interest rate risk management and accounted for as fair value hedges.

(6) Net interest rate spread is the difference between the average rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

(7) Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, to average interest-earning assets.

Net interest income decreased $0.6 million, or 2.8%, from $23.2 million in 2006 to $22.6 million in 2007. The decrease was mainly attributable to the change in rates paid on liabilities relative to those earned on assets. While the average yield on interest-earning assets increased 57 basis points in 2007 compared to 2006, the average costs of interest-bearing liabilities increased 59 basis points. CIB Marine has various strategies to improve net interest income, including growing loans and lower cost deposits, managing investments to improve performance of the portfolio, using collateralized borrowings such as FHLB advances and repurchase agreements when they have a relative cost advantage over other bank funding sources, and implementing strategies to become current with the interest payments on its junior subordinated debentures.

Net interest income decreased $1.8 million, or 7.1%, from $25.1 million in 2005 to $23.3 million in 2006. The decrease was mainly volume driven as average interest-earning assets, net of interest-bearing liabilities declined $19.8 million during 2006 compared to 2005. The impact of the volume decline was partially offset by a 2 basis point increase in the net interest spread.

30

The following table presents an analysis of changes in net interest income resulting from changes in average volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and average rates earned and paid.

	Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006 (2)												Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005 (2)
	Volume			Rate			Total			% Change			Volume			Rate			Total			% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest Income
Securities-taxable	$	(4,999	)	$	1,242		$	(3,757	)		(20.29	)%	$	(2,662	)	$	4,629		$	1,967			11.89	%
Securities-tax-exempt (1)		(99	)		19			(80	)		(49.69	)		(324	)		(24	)		(348	)		(68.37	)
Total securities		(5,098	)		1,261			(3,837	)		(20.55	)		(2,986	)		4,605			1,619			9.49
Loans held for sale		3			—			3			150.00			(106	)		25			(81	)		(97.59	)
Commercial		890			(80	)		810			20.91			(4,540	)		1,644			(2,896	)		(42.78	)
Commercial real estate		(806	)		574			(232	)		(0.75	)		(2,642	)		3,285			643			2.13
Consumer		4,574			941			5,515			142.47			2,257			114			2,371			158.07
Total loans (including fees)		4,658			1,435			6,093			15.81			(4,925	)		5,043			118			0.31
Federal funds sold		(1,147	)		73			(1,074	)		(24.98	)		(2,169	)		2,173			4			0.09
Total interest income (1)		(1,584	)		2,769			1,185			1.93			(10,186	)		11,846			1,660			2.77
Interest Expense
Interest-bearing demand deposits		(69	)		7			(62	)		(14.59	)		(133	)		(70	)		(203	)		(32.32	)
Money market		(951	)		246			(705	)		(9.13	)		(423	)		2,959			2,536			48.89
Other savings deposits		(66	)		(2	)		(68	)		(31.05	)		(142	)		(48	)		(190	)		(46.45	)
Time deposits		(1,772	)		3,055			1,283			6.14			(4,863	)		4,970			107			0.52
Total deposits		(2,858	)		3,306			448			1.53			(5,561	)		7,811			2,250			8.33
Borrowings-short-term		709			(19	)		690			68.45			(92	)		305			213			26.79
Borrowings-long-term		(108	)		(19	)		(127	)		(51.84	)		(122	)		—			(122	)		(33.24	)
Junior subordinated debentures		—			814			814			10.51			—			1,106			1,106			16.67
Total borrowed funds		601			776			1,377			15.31			(214	)		1,411			1,197			15.35
Total interest expense		(2,257	)		4,082			1,825			4.77			(5,775	)		9,222			3,447			9.91
Net interest income (1)	$	673		$	(1,313	)	$	(640	)		(2.75	)%	$	(4,411	)	$	2,624		$	(1,787	)		(7.13	)%

(1) In the future, CIB Marine may not realize all of the tax benefits associated with tax-exempt assets due to substantial losses, and at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 no U.S. federal or state loss carryback potential remains. Accordingly, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis.

31

(2) Variances which were not specifically attributable to volume or rate have been allocated proportionally between volume and rate using absolute values as a basis for the allocation. Nonaccruing loans were included in the average balances used in determining yields.

Interest Income

Total interest income increased $1.2 million, or 1.9%, from $61.5 million in 2006 to $62.7 million in 2007. The increase was the result of a 57 basis point increase in the average yields earned on interest-earning assets, partially offset by a $69.5 million decline in average balances on interest-earning assets. The largest increase was in interest income on loans which increased by $6.1 million, or 15.8%, from $38.5 million during 2006 to $44.6 million during 2007. The increase in loan interest income was primarily due to a $57.4 million increase in the average balance resulting from the purchase of two pools of fixed rate second lien home equity loans during the second quarter of 2006 and the first quarter of 2007. Additionally, the average yield on loans increased 32 basis points due to the rising rate environment and the purchase of the home equity pools. The pools which were purchased in June 2006 and February 2007 had a weighted average yield of 9.5% and 10.1%, respectively. See the loan discussion for further information on the 2007 purchase. The increase in interest income on loans was partially offset by a $3.8 million decrease in interest income on securities due mainly to a decrease of $106.0 million in average balances outstanding in 2007 compared to 2006. The decrease was mainly due to repayments and sales of U. S. government agency and mortgage backed securities. In accordance with its liquidity risk management strategies, CIB Marine used a portion of these proceeds to settle deposits sold as part of the branch sales and to purchase higher yielding assets.

Total interest income increased $1.7 million, or 2.8%, from $59.9 million in 2005 to $61.5 million in 2006. The increase was the result of a 114 basis point increase in the average yields earned on interest-earning assets, offset by a $201.6 million decline in average balances on interest-earning assets. The increase in the average yield was primarily due to a rising rate environment. The volume decrease on interest-earning assets was driven by a $69.6 million decrease in average loan balances, a $76.7 million decrease in securities and a $53.9 million decrease in federal funds sold. The overall decline in the volume of average interest-earning assets was primarily due to the decline in the average loan balances outstanding due to market conditions, limited lending personnel and collection efforts and a decline in securities and federal funds sold due to CIB Marine’s asset liability management in response to the decline in average deposits.

Interest Expense

Total interest expense increased $1.8 million, or 4.8%, from $38.2 million in 2006 to $40.0 million in 2007. The increase was the result of a 59 basis point increase in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by a $63.5 million decrease in the average balances of these liabilities. Interest expense on deposits, the largest component of interest-bearing liabilities, increased $0.4 million, or 1.5%, from $29.2 million in 2006 to $29.7 million in 2007, due to a 49 basis point increase in average deposit costs incurred during a rising rate environment, partially offset by a $77.7 million reduction in average deposit balances. Additionally, interest expense from borrowings increased $1.4 million during 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due the compounding effect of interest payment deferrals and higher yields on the junior subordinated debentures. CIB Marine has continued to defer the payments of interest on its junior subordinated debentures. Interest accrues on each of the deferred payments at the coupon rate of the debentures, creating a compounding effect for the interest expense of the debentures. This causes interest expense for the debentures to increase each year and become an increasing percentage of total interest expense and total average interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, total average earning assets have decreased over the past three years making the interest expense burden of the debentures even greater.  For 2007, the interest expense for the debentures was $8.6 million, or 21.4% of total interest expense and 0.9% of total average earning assets; for 2006 the interest expense for the debentures was $7.7 million, or 20.2% of total interest expense and 0.8% of total average earning assets; and for 2005 the interest expense for the debentures was $6.6 million, or 19.1% of total interest expense and 0.6% of total average earning assets.

32

Total interest expense increased $3.4 million, or 9.9%, from $34.8 million in 2005 to $38.2 million in 2006. The increase was the result of a 112 basis point increase in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by a $181.8 million decrease in the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities. Interest expense on deposits, the largest component of interest-bearing liabilities, increased $2.2 million, or 8.3%, from $27.0 million in 2005 to $29.2 million in 2006, due to a 96 basis point increase in average deposit costs, partially offset by a $176.6 million reduction in average deposit balances. The decline in the average deposit volume was a result of CIB Marine’s branch sales during 2006 and less competitive pricing in a rising rate environment. Interest expense on borrowed funds during 2006 increased by $1.2 million compared to 2005 primarily due to the rising interest rate environment and the compounding effect of interest payment deferrals on junior subordinated debentures.

Net Interest Margin/Net Interest Spread

CIB Marine’s net interest margin, which is the ratio of net interest income to average interest-earning assets, increased by 10 basis points during 2007 compared to 2006 and its net interest spread, which is the difference between the rate earned on average interest-earning assets and the rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities, decreased by 2 basis points during the same period. The increase in the net interest margin was primarily due to rising yields on assets funded by noninterest-bearing funding sources.

CIB Marine’s net interest margin increased by 23 basis points during 2006 compared to 2005 and its net interest spread increased by 2 basis points during the same period. The increase in the net interest margin and net interest spread were primarily due to rising yields on assets relative to rising costs of liabilities. The net interest margin widened more than the net interest spread due to the increases in yields of assets funded by noninterest-bearing liabilities. CIB Marine’s net interest margin and net interest spread are adversely impacted by low loan volumes, high nonaccrual loans, low savings deposit balances and high junior subordinated debt relative to interest-earning assets.

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses represents charges made to earnings in order to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses and losses on unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit. The provision for credit losses was $6.4 million during 2007, compared to a negative $4.4 million during 2006. The change in the provision was primarily due to an increase in the cumulative total of commercial, commercial real estate and commercial real estate construction loans during 2007 as compared to a decrease in the cumulative total of these loans during 2006; a $1.8 million decrease in nonaccrual loans during 2007 compared to an $8.4 million decrease in these loans during 2006; and net charge-offs compared to net recoveries during the same respective periods. Additionally, during 2007, CIB Marine increased its provision related to home equity loans to account for the purchase of a $48.2 million closed end pool of fixed rate second lien home equity loans in February 2007 and to account for the deterioration in this pool and a similar $47.8 million pool it purchased in June 2006.

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had a $73.0 million remaining principal balance on the $96.0 million closed end second lien home equity loan pools it purchased in June 2006 and February 2007. The quality of the loan pools deteriorated in part due to the deterioration in the housing markets and the sudden and significant tightening of credit standards and reduction in credit availability in the mortgage finance markets beginning in the third quarter of 2007. The ratio of total loans past due 30 days or more, including nonaccrual loans, to outstanding principal balances of these two pools was 1.7% and 5.4% at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Due to the deterioration and the purchase of the $48.2 million pool in February 2007, the provision for credit losses related to these pools increased from $1.1 million in 2006 to $6.2 million in 2007.

33

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income decreased $1.5 million, or 32.8%, from $4.5 million in 2006 to $3.0 million in 2007, mainly due to net gains recognized on a greater number of branch sales during 2006 than in 2007. During 2007, CIB Marine sold two branches at a net pretax gain of $1.1 million while during the same period of 2006, CIB Marine sold six branches at a combined pretax gain of $2.7 million.

Noninterest income increased $1.6 million, or 54.9%, from $2.9 million in 2005 to $4.5 million in 2006. The increase was due to a $2.7 million net gain on the sale of the deposits and assets of six branches during 2006, compared to none in 2005. This increase was partially offset by a $0.4 million gain on the sale of investment securities during 2005 and a $0.4 million decrease in other service fees in 2006 compared to 2005. The decrease in other service fees is primarily due to fees collected by CIB Marine during the first quarter of 2005 for processing services it provided to CIB-Chicago subsequent to the sale of CIB-Chicago.

Noninterest Expense

Total noninterest expense decreased $7.7 million, or 18.2%, from $42.1 million in 2006, to $34.4 million in 2007. The decrease was primarily the result of the following:

· Compensation and employee benefits expense is the largest component of noninterest expense and represented 52.7% of total noninterest expense for 2007 compared to 48.6% for 2006. Compensation and employee benefits expense decreased $2.3 million or 11.3% from $20.5 million in 2006 to $18.2 million in 2007. The decrease is primarily due to the sale and closure of certain bank branches during 2006 and 2007. The total number of full-time equivalent employees of companies included in continuing operations, decreased from 301 at December 31, 2006 to 258 at December 31, 2007.

· Impairment loss on securities was $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to none for the year ended December 31, 2007. During 2007 but prior to the issuance of its 2006 consolidated financial statements, CIB Marine decided to sell certain of its available for sale securities. As a result of this decision, CIB Marine determined it would not be holding these certain securities for a period of time sufficient to recover the carrying value at December 31, 2006. Accordingly, CIB Marine realized a $1.1 million other-than-temporary loss on these certain securities during 2006. There were no such impairment losses during 2007.

· Professional services decreased $1.1 million mainly due to reduced legal expenses resulting from the settlement of certain litigation in 2006.

· Other expense decreased $3.4 million from $9.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 to $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 mainly due to a $1.8 million contingent liability recognized in the first quarter of 2006, decreased regulatory assessments and cost savings resulting from management initiatives and the closure and sale of certain bank branches. The contingent liability expense related to the settlement of the Hadley litigation in the first quarter of 2007. See Item 3-Legal Proceedings in Part I of this Form 10-K for further information regarding this litigation.

Total noninterest expense decreased $8.9 million, or 17.4%, from $51.0 million in 2005, to $42.1 million in 2006. The decrease was primarily the result of the following:

· Compensation and employee benefits expense is the largest component of noninterest expense and represented 48.6% of total noninterest expense for 2006 compared to 50.4% for 2005. Compensation and employee benefits expense decreased $5.2 million or 20.3% from $25.7 million in 2005 to $20.5 million in 2006. The decrease is primarily due to an overall cost savings program initiated by CIB Marine and the sale and closure of certain branches in 2006 and 2007. The total number of full-time equivalent employees of companies included in continuing operations, decreased from 359 at December 31, 2005 to 301 at December 31, 2006.

34

On January 1, 2006, CIB Marine adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS 123(R)”), Share-Based Payments. A key provision of SFAS 123(R) requires public companies to adopt Statement 123’s fair-value method of accounting for stock options. Under this method, the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity instruments is measured based on the grant-date fair value of these instruments. The cost is recognized over the requisite service period. SFAS 123(R) applies to all awards granted after the required effective date and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date. Pro forma disclosure for grants after 2005 is no longer an alternative. Prior to 2006, CIB Marine accounted for stock options in accordance with APB Opinion 25, as allowed under SFAS 123, and therefore, no compensation cost had been recognized in connection with stock options granted in any year prior to 2006. During 2006, CIB Marine adopted SFAS 123(R) on a modified prospective basis and accordingly, recorded a $0.1 million compensation expense in 2006 related to stock options.

· During 2006, CIB Marine recognized a net gain on the sale of assets of $2.7 million which is included in noninterest income. During 2005, CIB Marine recognized $1.9 million in write down and losses on assets. The $1.9 million loss recognized during 2005 was mainly due to a $1.7 million loss on the sale of a limited number of commercial real estate and commercial construction loans, a $0.3 million impairment loss on fixed assets of closed facilities and a $0.1 million impairment loss on its equity interest in a small business investment company. These losses were partially offset by a $0.3 million gain on the sale of the fixed assets and deposits of its Sebring, Florida branch.

· During 2007 but prior to the issuance of its 2006 and 2005 consolidated financial statements, CIB Marine decided to sell certain of its available for sale securities. As a result of this decision, CIB Marine determined it would not be holding these certain securities for a period of time sufficient to recover the carrying value at December 31, 2006. Accordingly, CIB Marine realized a $1.1 million other-than-temporary loss on these certain securities during 2006 compared to $2.0 million other-than-temporary loss during 2005. See the Securities discussion for further information.

· Other noninterest expense decreased $0.2 million from $9.4 million during 2005 to $9.2 million during 2006. Included in noninterest expense is a $1.8 million contingent liability expense related to the settlement of the Hadley litigation in the first quarter of 2007. See Item 3-Legal Proceedings in Part II of this Form 10-K for further information on the settlement. Offsetting the 2006 settlement expense is a $0.8 million decrease in advertising, supplies, shipping and handling due to management initiatives and closing/sale of branches; a $0.5 million decrease in FDIC and state assessments; a $0.2 million decrease in collection expense; and a $0.4 million decrease in other noninterest expense.

Income Taxes

No tax benefit has been recognized on the consolidated net operating losses for 2007 and 2006 due to significant federal and state net operating loss carryforwards on which the realization of related tax benefits is not more likely than not.The continuing operations income tax benefits for 2007 and 2006 consisted primarily of the allocation of taxes in accordance with tax sharing agreements with companies included in discontinued operations that would have been payable had it not been for the losses from continuing operations included in CIB Marine’s consolidated returns.

In June 2006, the FASB released FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. CIB Marine adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 and has completed the process of evaluating the effect of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements as of January 1, 2007 and as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. The FIN 48 adjustment is related to CIB Marine’s investment in an Illinois Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) owned by its former Illinois banking subsidiary, which was sold in 2004. As of December 31, 2006, CIB Marine maintained a $1.9 million liability related to its exposure. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 was a $1.0 million increase in liabilities of companies held for disposal and a $1.0 million decrease to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. During 2007the statute of limitations expired with respect to a portion of this exposure. As a result of this event, CIB Marine reversed $1.3 million of the tax liability through a credit to discontinued operations tax expense while also recording a $0.3 million charge to its discontinued operations tax expense for interest and penalties related to the remaining REIT tax exposure. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, CIB Marine had a $1.7 million and $1.9 million current tax liability related to the tax exposure of its former subsidiary. This amount is included in liabilities of companies held for disposal on the consolidated balance sheets. At both December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, CIB Marine also had a $0.5 million current tax liability related to individually insignificant federal and state tax items. Of this amount $0.2 million is included in liabilities of companies held for disposal and $0.3 million is netted against the income tax receivable included in other assets.

CIB Marine files income tax returns in the U. S. federal and various state jurisdictions. CIB Marine is no longer subject to income tax examinations by U. S. federal or state tax authorities for years before 1999. As of January 1, 2007 the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $4.7 million. At December 31, 2007, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $2.4 million. CIB Marine recognizes any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. As of the date of adoption of FIN 48, approximately $1.0 million was accrued for the potential payment of interest and penalties. CIB Marine does not anticipate significant adjustments to the amount of total unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

35

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Overview

During 2007, CIB Marine continued to focus on improving its financial condition and allocated increased resources to business development as part of its strategic focus. Additionally, CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks closed three branches and sold the deposits and property and equipment of two other branches. At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine had total assets of $1.0 billion. While total assets remained relatively unchanged from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007, the asset mix changed as CIB Marine grew its loan portfolio through originations and purchases. Net loans as a percentage of total assets was 57.1% at December 31, 2007 compared to 50.3% at December 31, 2006, while the combined securities and federal funds sold was 36.6% and 42.5% at the same respective dates.

Securities

CIB Marine seeks to manage its investment portfolio in a manner that promotes the achievement of its liquidity goals, optimizes after-tax net income, provides collateral to secure borrowings, assists CIB Marine in meeting various regulatory requirements, and is consistent with its market risk policies. CIB Marine manages the maturity structure of the investment portfolio to provide a stream of cash flows to complement liquidity risk management, market risk management and to promote long-term earnings.

The carrying value and yield of CIB Marine’s securities are set forth in the following table.

	Year Ended December 31, (1)
	2007					2006						2005
	Amount		Yield to Maturity			Amount			Yield to Maturity			Amount			Yield to Maturity
	(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. government agencies	$	63,104		4.78	%	$	101,321			4.83	%	$	155,867			3.88	%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		31,031		5.26			32,067			5.10			27,580			5.07
Other notes and bonds		9,098		5.96			350			6.66			350			6.73
Asset-backed securities		—		—			2,192			5.65			9,568			3.72
Corporate commercial paper		—		—			4,384			5.40			13,033			4.49
Mortgage-backed securities		211,706		5.17			194,854			4.93			263,727			4.36
Total securities before market value adjustment		314,939		5.12	%		335,168			4.93	%		470,125			4.23	%
Available for sale market value adjustment		1,382					(1,880	)					(3,435	)
Total securities available for sale	$	316,321				$	333,288					$	466,690

(1) In the future, CIB Marine may not realize all of the tax benefits associated with tax-exempt assets due to substantial losses. Accordingly, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis.

Total securities outstanding at December 31, 2007 were $316.3 million, a decrease of $17.0 million, or 5.1%, from $333.3 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease was mainly due to repayment and sales proceeds being used to settle deposits sold as part of branch sales and purchase higher yielding assets. During the first quarter of 2007, CIB Marine decided to sell certain securities in its available for sale portfolio. The sale of these securities in 2007 supported CIB Marine’s asset-liability strategy of selling lower yielding assets and purchasing higher yielding assets. A portion of the proceeds were also used to pay down certain short-term liabilities incurred as a result of the sale of branches and the purchase of a pool of home equity loans in 2007.

36

At December 31, 2007, 20.0% of the portfolio consisted of U.S. government agency securities, compared to 30.2% at December 31, 2006, and 67.2% of the portfolio consisted of mortgage-backed securities compared to 58.1% at those same periods. Obligations of states and political subdivisions represented 9.9% of the portfolio at December 31, 2007, compared to 9.6% at December 31, 2006. Most of these obligations were general obligations of states or political subdivisions of states in which CIB Marine’s subsidiaries are located. The ratio of total securities to total assets was 31.5% and 33.4% at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Securities classified as available for sale are those that CIB Marine has not classified as held to maturity or as trading securities. CIB Marine has not maintained any securities for trading purposes or classified any securities as held for maturity. CIB Marine may sell securities classified as available for sale if it believes the sale is necessary for liquidity, asset/liability management or other reasons. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in equity. Based on its evaluation of the individual securities in its available for sale portfolio at December 31, 2007, CIB Marine has determined that it has no securities in its portfolio which are other-than-temporarily impaired.

CIB Marine invests in residential mortgage backed securities (“MBS”) including those in the form of passthrough securities, collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) and real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”). The issuers of the securities include the government agency Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), the government sponsored enterprises Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), and certain private issuers. CIB Marine’s investments in private issuer MBS include only those classes of securities whose cash flows have been structured to provide a senior and superior position relative to lesser classes of securities that share the same residential mortgage collateral. This form of credit enhancement provides the senior class holders with a higher level of protection against credit losses than if CIB Marine were to wholly own the mortgages itself. CIB Marine had balances of $35.2 million yielding 4.91% and $100.4 million yielding 5.43% in private issuer MBS at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. CIB Marine has increased its holdings in this type of security due to the higher yields attainable. At December 31, 2007, all of CIB Marine’s investments in private issuer MBS are performing and are rated AAA investment grade by one or more of the nationally recognized statistical rating agencies. The predominant forms of underlying collateral in the securities are fixed rate, first lien mortgages where the majority of the weighted average loan-to-value ratios and borrower credit scores are less than 70% and greater than 730, respectively. Credit losses in the securities could result if mortgage collateral losses reach certain levels. However at this time, CIB Marine expects to receive scheduled principal and interest payments in a timely manner and does not anticipate any credit losses and as a result, CIB Marine has not recognized any impairment on these securities. In addition, CIB Marine invests in debt obligations collateralized by diversified pools of bank trust preferred securities, property and casualty insurance debt, and for one such security, loans to REITs. CIB Marine had a balance of $8.3 million in these securities yielding 5.96% at December 31, 2007. CIB Marine had no investment in these securities at December 31, 2006. All of CIB Marine’s investment holdings are rated investment grade at December 31, 2007. CIB Marine does not anticipate any credit losses in the securities and has not recognized any impairment on them. However, given the conditions in the housing markets, the credit markets and the general economy at this time, CIB Marine does recognize a higher than normal risk for a potential deterioration in the credit ratings assigned the investment securities, a greater vulnerability for market prices of the securities to deteriorate, and the potential for conditions to worsen to the extent that payment delays or credit losses could occur.

The following table presents the maturities and weighted average yields of securities as of December 31, 2007.

	December 31, 2007
	1 Year and Less					1 to 5 Years					5 to 10 Years					Over 10 Years					Total
	Balance		Yield to Maturity			Balance		Yield to Maturity			Balance		Yield to Maturity			Balance		Yield to Maturity			Balance		Yield to Maturity
U.S. government agencies	$	18,471		4.49	%	$	44,633		4.91	%	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	63,104		4.78	%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		655		5.51			1,206		5.09			14,599		5.03			14,571		5.48			31,031		5.26
Other notes and bonds		—		—			350		5.98			—		—			8,748		5.96			9,098		5.96
Commercial paper		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—
Mortgage-backed securities		104		6.39			599		3.87			22,509		5.11			188,494		5.18			211,706		5.17
Total securities before market value adjustment	$	19,230		4.53	%	$	46,788		4.91	%	$	37,108		5.08	%	$	211,813		5.24	%	$	314,939		5.12	%
Available for sale market value adjustment																						1,382
Total securities																					$	316,321

37

Since December 31, 2007, due to economic conditions, several nationally recognized rating agencies downgraded the credit ratings of several of the investment grade credit insuring companies. Several of the downgraded companies insure municipal obligation investments owned by CIB Marine. The municipal obligations have a par value of $16.5 million and a fair value of $16.4 million as of December 31, 2007. CIB Marine has not recognized any impairment on these affected municipal obligations and the securities are still considered investment grade quality as rated by the rating agencies.

Loans

General. CIB Marine offers a broad range of loan products, including commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and residential real estate construction loans, residential real estate loans, and various types of consumer loans. CIB Marine’s underwriting standards, as contained within its loan policy, are based on the general assumption that the primary source of repayment should be the regular operating cash flows and the secondary source should be the liquidation and disposition of collateral. Under the current policies of CIB Marine, exceptions to this policy are permitted with the approval of the Executive Loan Committee, the Chief Credit Officer or certain credit administration officers to the level of credit authority. Exceptions to the policy have, in the past, been approved by the loan committees of individual banks.

Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, were $574.5 million at December 31, 2007, an increase of $72.8 million, or 14.5%, from $501.7 million at December 31, 2006, and represented 57.1% and 50.3% of CIB Marine’s total assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The majority of the increase was in commercial real estate construction and commercial loans which increased $28.6 million and $13.3 million, respectively, resulting from CIB Marine’s business development strategy, and home equity loans which increased $50.5 million. The increase in the home equity portfolio was primarily due to the purchase of a closed end pool of fixed rate second lien home equity loans from Residential Funding Corporation, a division of General Motors Acceptance Corporation, in the amount of $48.2 million in June 2007. The purchased pool included 965 loans with a weighted average yield of 10.0%, term to maturity of 17.5 years, loan-to-value ratio of 94%, borrower debt service-to-income ratios of 40%, and FICO score of 709. These increases were partially offset by a $24.0 million decline in commercial real estate loans during 2007.

CIB Marine has no plans to acquire any further home equity portfolios.  In the course of business, CIB Marine may acquire home equity or other consumer loans from other lenders, but only on a loan by loan basis where CIB Marine reserves the right to decline individual loans that do not meet its standards.  In addition, CIB Marine, as a community bank in the markets it serves, will make commercial real estate loans either acting as a lead lender or participating with other banks.  However, it applies a standard credit process to all commercial lending to effectively manage credit risk throughout its markets.

The following tables sets forth a summary of CIB Marine’s loan portfolio by category for each of the periods indicated. The data for each category is presented in terms of total dollars outstanding and as a percentage of the total loans outstanding.

TOTAL COMPANY-CONTINUING AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS :

	December 31,
	2007(1)						2006 (1)						2005 (1)						2004 (1)						2003 (2)
	Balance			%			Balance			%			Balance			%			Balance			%			Balance			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial	$	63,046			10.6	%	$	49,777			9.5	%	$	69,048			13.4	%	$	193,574			25.9	%	$	708,252			29.9	%
Factored receivables		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			11,447			0.5
Commercial real estate		258,265			43.5			282,233			54.0			323,384			62.6			404,503			54.1			1,184,542			50.1
Commercial real estate construction		139,663			23.5			111,040			21.3			89,313			17.3			109,676			14.7			363,822			15.4
Residential real estate		21,540			3.6			19,225			3.7			19,925			3.9			31,027			4.1			85,893			3.6
Home equity loans		108,486			18.3			57,990			11.1			12,603			2.4			7,701			1.0			12,272			0.5
Consumer loans		3,241			0.5			2,363			0.4			2,179			0.4			2,124			0.3			3,554			0.2
Receivables from sale of stock		(121	)		(0.0	)		(151	)		(0.0	)		(202	)		(0.0	)		(946	)		(0.1	)		(5,208	)		(0.2	)
Gross loans		594,120			100.0	%		522,477			100.0	%		516,250			100.0	%		747,659			100.0	%		2,364,574			100.0	%
Deferred loan fees		1,741						247						(706	)					(1,044	)					(4,533	)
Total loans		595,861						522,724						515,544						746,615						2,360,041
Allowance for loan losses		(20,706	)					(20,906	)					(24,882	)					(29,551	)					(109,872	)
Net loans	$	575,155					$	501,818					$	490,662					$	717,064					$	2,250,169

(1) Includes loans of Mortgage Services, Inc. whose operations and substantially all of its assets were sold in 2004.

38

(2) Includes loans of CIB-Chicago and Commercial Finance which were both sold in the fourth quarter of 2004. Also included are loans of Mortgage Services Inc. whose operations and substantially all of its assets were sold in 2004.

CIB MARINE-CONTINUING OPERATIONS ONLY:

	December 31,
	2007						2006						2005						2004						2003
	Balance			%			Balance			%			Balance			%			Balance			%			Balance			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial	$	63,046			10.6	%	$	49,777			9.5	%	$	69,048			13.4	%	$	193,574			25.9	%	$	416,323			33.8	%
Commercial real estate		258,265			43.5			282,233			54.0			323,384			62.6			404,503			54.1			537,791			43.6
Commercial real estate construction		139,663			23.5			111,040			21.3			89,313			17.3			109,676			14.7			205,359			16.6
Residential real estate		20,938			3.5			19,125			3.7			19,925			3.9			31,027			4.1			63,120			5.1
Home equity loans		108,486			18.3			57,990			11.1			12,603			2.4			7,701			1.0			9,876			0.8
Consumer loans		3,241			0.6			2,363			0.4			2,179			0.4			2,124			0.3			3,030			0.2
Receivables from sale of stock		(121	)		(0.0	)		(151	)		(0.0	)		(202	)		(0.0	)		(946	)		(0.1	)		(1,530	)		(0.1	)
Gross loans		593,518			100.0	%		522,377			100.0	%		516,250			100.0	%		747,659			100.0	%		1,233,969			100.0	%
Deferred loan fees		1,741						247						(706	)					(1,044	)					(2,557	)
Total loans		595,259						522,624						515,544						746,615						1,231,412
Allowance for loan losses		(20,706	)					(20,906	)					(24,882	)					(29,551	)					(54,382	)
Net loans	$	574,553					$	501,718					$	490,662					$	717,064					$	1,177,030

Commercial Loans. At December 31, 2007, commercial loans totaled $63.0 million, an increase of $13.3 million, or 26.7%, from the prior year-end and represented 10.6% of gross loans. Commercial loans consist of loans to small and medium-sized businesses in a wide variety of industries, including wholesalers, manufacturers and business service companies. CIB Marine provides a broad range of commercial loans, including lines of credit for working capital purposes, accounts receivable and inventory financing, and term notes for the acquisition of equipment and for other purposes. In general, commercial loans are collateralized by inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, real estate and other commercial assets, and may be supported by other credit enhancements, such as personal and corporate guarantees on these borrowings. When warranted by the overall financial condition of the borrower, loans may also be made on an unsecured basis. Commercial loans generally have floating interest rates.

Commercial Real Estate Loans. At December 31, 2007, commercial real estate loans decreased $24.0 million, or 8.5%, from the prior year end and represented 43.5% of gross loans. Commercial real estate loans are made to finance commercial properties such as office buildings, multi-family residences, motels, strip malls, warehouses and other commercial properties for which CIB Marine primarily holds real property as collateral. CIB Marine may also require other credit enhancements, such as personal and corporate guarantees, on these borrowings. Commercial real estate loans are made at both fixed and variable interest rates. CIB Marine’s underwriting standards generally require that a commercial real estate loan not exceed 80% of the appraised value of the property securing the loan.

Commercial Real Estate Construction Loans. At December 31, 2007, commercial real estate construction loans totaled $139.7 million, an increase of $28.6 million, or 25.8%, over the prior year end and represented 23.5% of gross loans. Commercial real estate construction loans include loans for the construction of office buildings, multi-family residences, motels, strip malls, warehouses, and other commercial real estate projects. Prior to approving construction financing CIB Marine generally requires that permanent financing for the project has been approved by CIB Marine or a nonaffiliated third party, or there is a significant number of pre-sold units or pre-leased units (depending on project type) to evidence the economic viability of the project. These loans are typically secured by the real estate on which the project is being constructed, and generally require that the principal amount of the loan be no more than the lesser of 80% of the projects appraised value upon completion or 100% of the estimated construction costs. CIB Marine may also require other credit enhancements, such as personal and corporate guarantees, on these borrowings. Generally, site inspections and various affidavits and statements are required before a draw on the loan is disbursed. Real estate construction loans are made at both fixed and variable interest rates.

Residential Real Estate Loans. At December 31, 2007, residential mortgage loans, that are not held for sale totaled $21.5 million and represented 3.6% of gross loans, compared to $19.2 million and 3.7%, respectively, at December 31, 2006.

39

Home Equity and Consumer Loans. CIB Marine also offers a variety of other types of consumer loans, including installment, home equity and credit card loans. These consumer loans totaled $111.7 million at December 31, 2007 and represented 18.8% of gross loans, compared to $60.4 million and 11.5%, respectively, at December 31, 2006. During 2007, CIB Marine purchased a $48.2 million closed end pool of fixed rate second lien home equity loans from Residential Funding Corporation, a division of General Motors Acceptance Corporation. The purchased pool included 965 loans with a weighted average yield of 10.0%, term to maturity of 17.5 years, loan-to-value ratio of 94%, borrower debt service-to-income ratios of 40%, and FICO score of 709.

Leveraged Financing. CIB Marine has also provided leveraged financing, including mezzanine loans, to certain of its borrowers through CIB Marine Capital. Such loans were included in the applicable loan categories. During the fourth quarter of 2003, CIB Marine Capital ceased to offer new loans and began the winding down of its affairs, including the sale and collection of outstanding loans. CIB Marine does not expect the mezzanine loan portfolio will represent a significant portion of the total loan portfolio in the future. At December 31, 2006 CIB Marine Capital had $0.8 million in gross mezzanine loans outstanding with an allocated specific reserve for the full amount of the outstanding loan balance. During the first quarter of 2007, the entire balance of these loans was charged off. At December 31, 2007 CIB Marine Capital had no mezzanine loans outstanding.

Receivables from Sale of Stock. CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks have made loans to borrowers to purchase CIB Marine stock in private placement offerings from CIB Marine, or from other shareholders. Loans originated by CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks to purchase CIB Marine stock that are not sufficiently collateralized by assets other than CIB Marine stock are accounted for as a reduction of stockholders’ equity unless the loan has been repaid prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Such loans are recorded as receivables from sale of stock (a contra-equity account) and totaled $0.1 million and $0.2 million at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Interest earned on these loans was $0.01 million in both 2007 and 2006, and $0.03 million in 2005, and is included in “interest and dividend income-loans” and “discontinued operations” as appropriate.

Loan Maturities. The following table sets forth the maturity distribution and interest rate sensitivity of selected loan categories as of December 31, 2007. Maturities are based upon contractual terms of the underlying loans and amounts exclude assets of companies held for sale.

	December 31, 2007
	1 year and less			1 to 5 Years		Over 5 years		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial	$	40,377		$	21,873	$	796	$	63,046
Commercial real estate		74,057			134,008		50,200		258,265
Commercial real estate construction		105,422			32,919		1,322		139,663
Residential real estate		13,187			3,132		4,619		20,938
Home equity loans		75,887			10,856		21,743		108,486
Consumer loans		1,166			1,991		84		3,241
Loans to purchase stock		(121	)		—		—		(121	)
Total gross loans	$	309,975		$	204,779	$	78,764	$	593,518
Sensitivity to changes in interest rates
Fixed rates		152,564			129,377		46,122		328,063
Variable rates		157,411			75,402		32,642		265,455
Total gross loans	$	309,975		$	204,779	$	78,764	$	593,518

Credit Concentrations

At December 31, 2007 CIB Marine had one secured borrowing relationship (loans to one borrower or a related group of borrowers) that exceeded 25% of stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2007, the total outstanding commitments on that borrowing relationship, including lines of credit not fully drawn, was 36.9% of equity and 3.7% of total loans, and the principal drawn and outstanding on loans in this one borrowing relationship was $6.9 million. As of December 31, 2007 all loans within this borrowing relationship were current. At December 31, 2006, CIB Marine also had one borrowing relationship that exceeded 25% of stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2006, the total outstanding commitments on that borrowing relationship to a commercial general contractor, including lines of credit not fully drawn, were 25.8% of equity and 3.5% of total loans, and the principal drawn and outstanding was $3.1 million.

40

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine also had credit relationships within five industries or industry groups with loans outstanding in that industry or industry group that exceeded 25% of its stockholders’ equity:

INDUSTRY	Outstanding Balance		% of Loans			% of Stockholders’ Equity
	(Dollars in millions)
Commercial Real Estate Developers	$	174.6		29	%		290	%
Residential Real Estate Developers		139.4		23			231
Health Care Facilities		29.7		5			49
Motel and Hotel		20.8		4			35
Nursing/Convalescent Homes		18.5		3			31

Credit Procedures and Review

In order to manage credit risk and the growth of the loan portfolio, CIB Marine developed, implemented and periodically updates various policies and procedures, including a comprehensive loan policy, and established a signature approval and committee structure. The loan policy establishes underwriting standards, a loan approval process, loan officer lending limits, loan pricing guidelines, a credit rating system, delinquency monitoring procedures, and credit collection procedures. The loan underwriting, approval and review processes are designed to protect asset quality by assuring that credit requests are independently reviewed on at least two different levels, and to promote uniform lending standards among CIB Marine and its subsidiaries.

Loan Underwriting. The underwriting standards contained within CIB Marine’s loan policy address various aspects of the lending function, including an analysis of a borrower’s ability to repay, collateral requirements, loan-to-value ratios, appraisals and personal guarantees. CIB Marine’s underwriting standards are based on the assumption that the principal source of repayment should be the regular operating cash flows of the borrower and the secondary source should be the liquidation and disposition of collateral. The extent to which collateral is required for a loan is determined by the loan policy and management’s assessment of the creditworthiness of the borrower. The amount and type of collateral required varies, but may include real estate, marketable securities, deposits held in financial institutions, accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. CIB Marine may also require personal and corporate guarantees when deemed necessary. Collateral values are monitored on a regular basis to ensure that they are maintained at an adequate level. CIB Marine obtains and updates appraisals on collateral when management believes they are necessary and as required by applicable laws or regulations.

Loan Approval. The approval process for a loan depends upon the size of the borrowing relationship. Depending on the size, new loans and modifications or renewals of existing loans are approved either under a signature authority matrix or by the Executive Loan Committee, as created by the Board of Directors. In general, loans are approved under a sponsor/approver system (signature matrix) under which the Executive Loan Committee has granted pre-approved limits for individual lenders and credit department staff. The line personnel sponsor the credit and the credit department personnel approve the credit up to their assigned authority. The Executive Loan Committee reviews and approves all loans, renewals or modifications of existing loans to a borrower, or a related group of borrowers, which are individually or in the aggregate, including existing credits to such a borrower, or related group of borrowers, $2.5 million or greater. Since 2004 the Board has affirmed its commitment to limiting credit relationships. In 2007, CIB Marine further determined to target a lower exposure of $15.0 million per relationship except under certain circumstances. In 2007, CIB Marine’s President and CEO and the Chief Credit Officer of CIB Marine continued to hold veto authority over any loan. CIB Marine believes that these procedures have strengthened its underwriting process and provide additional controls to monitor and evaluate credit concentrations.

Loan Review. CIB Marine’s loan review function is responsible for assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio, establishing and monitoring adherence to underwriting standards and promptly identifying loans with potential credit exposure. Loan reviews are conducted on a regular basis at least annually or more frequently if warranted and included a comprehensive assessment of collateral and debt service ability. These analyses also include an evaluation of geographic, industry and other credit risks. In general all loans over $0.25 million are reviewed on an annual basis or more frequently when management believes additional reviews are necessary. CIB Marine has engaged outside vendors to perform the loan reviews.

41

Loans with identified weaknesses are monitored on an on-going basis by management and the applicable subsidiary’s Board of Directors. CIB Marine has in place a loan grade certification program requiring a periodic assessment and certification by individual lenders of portfolio risk ratings.

Allowance for Loan Losses

CIB Marine monitors and maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb an estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the amount of provision for loan losses and recoveries of previously charged-off loans, and is decreased by the amount of loans charged-off and negative provisions. At December 31, 2007, the allowance for loan losses was $20.7 million or 3.5% of total loans compared to $20.9 million, or 4.0% of total loans at December 31, 2006. Total charge-offs for 2007 were $8.2 million, while recoveries were $1.6 million. This compares to loan charge-offs of $0.6 million and recoveries of $1.0 million in 2006. Although CIB Marine believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible, there can be no assurance that the allowance will prove sufficient to cover actual loan losses in the future. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the quality of loans and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and may require CIB Marine to make additional provisions to the allowance based upon their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations. See Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Regulatory Matters in Part II of this Form 10-K.

The increase in charge-offs increased during 2007 compared to 2006 was predominately in commercial real estate and home equity loans.  These increases were largely related to charge-offs of a significant commercial real estate credit and to charge-offs in the purchased home equity loan pools.  Given the conditions in the housing markets and the economy in general, CIB Marine expects that the amount of charge-offs will continue to be at higher levels relative to those experienced during 2006.  Additional provisions to the allowance for loan losses were made during 2007 to account for the increase in the loan portfolio and the deterioration in credit quality of certain segments of the loan portfolio.

The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses for each of the periods indicated.

TOTAL COMPANY-CONTINUING AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	20,906		$	24,882		$	29,551		$	109,872		$	65,122
Loans charged-off:
Commercial:
Commercial		(939	)		(64	)		(1,380	)		(53,848	)		(31,011	)
Factored receivables		—			—			—			—			(95	)
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate		(4,985	)		(471	)		(1,945	)		(21,432	)		(18,115	)
Commercial real estate construction		(27	)		—			(524	)		(4,487	)		(53,668	)
Consumer:
Residential real estate		(198	)		(78	)		(49	)		(95	)		(153	)
Home equity		(2,015	)		—			—			—			—
Consumer		(28	)		(9	)		(13	)		(117	)		(97	)
Total charged-off		(8,192	)		(622	)		(3,911	)		(79,979	)		(103,139	)
Recoveries of loans charged-off:
Commercial:
Commercial		663			664			6,017			4,382			1,830
Factored receivables		—			—			—			—			4
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate		307			352			1,769			3,796			155
Commercial real estate construction		531			—			89			113			—
Consumer:
Residential real estate		7			—			23			215			3

42

	Years Ended December 31,
		2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
		(Dollars in thousands)
Home equity		62			—			—			—			—
Consumer		9			14			13			48			51
Total recoveries		1,579			1,030			7,911			8,554			2,043
Net loans recovered (charged-off)		(6,613	)		408			4,000			(71,425	)		(101,096	)
Allowance on loans sold		—			—			—			(38,842	)		—
Transfer from accrual for unfunded standby letters of credit for funded standby letters of credit		—			—			—			5,000			—
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses		6,413			(4,384	)		(8,669	)		24,946			145,846
Balance at end of year	$	20,706		$	20,906		$	24,882		$	29,551		$	109,872
Ratios
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		3.47	%		4.00	%		4.83	%		3.96	%		4.66	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing		109.37			94.37			59.06			47.08			70.72
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loan types:
Commercial		0.45			(1.19	)		(4.06	)		9.36			3.83
Commercial real estate and commercial real estate construction		1.02			0.03			0.13			1.71			3.90
Residential real estate, home equity and consumer		1.92			0.13			0.11			(0.14	)		0.36
Total loans		1.14			(0.08	)		(0.67	)		3.85			3.81
Ratio of recoveries to loans charged-off		19.27			165.59			202.28			10.70			1.98
Total loans	$	595,861		$	522,724		$	515,544		$	746,615		$	2,360,041
Average total loans		582,559			525,158			594,714			1,855,581			2,651,680
Provision for credit losses-total company
Provision for (reversal of) loan loss-continuing operations	$	6,413		$	(4,384	)	$	(8,669	)	$	16,707		$	50,506
Provision for loan loss-discontinued operations		—			—			—			8,239			95,340
Total Provision for (reversal of) loan loss		6,413			(4,384	)		(8,669	)		24,946			145,846
Provision for losses on unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit-continuing operations		—			—			—			725			—
Provision for (reversal of) losses on unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit-discontinued operations		—			—			—			(1,900	)		14,747
Total provision for (reversal of) credit losses	$	6,413		$	(4,384	)	$	(8,669	)	$	23,771		$	160,593

43

CIB MARINE-CONTINUING OPERATIONS ONLY:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	20,906		$	24,882		$	29,551		$	54,382		$	31,756
Loans charged-off:
Commercial:
Commercial		(939	)		(64	)		(1,380	)		(31,515	)		(11,115	)
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate		(4,985	)		(471	)		(1,945	)		(10,126	)		(4,340	)
Commercial real estate construction		(27	)		—			(524	)		(3,665	)		(13,676	)
Consumer:
Residential real estate		(198	)		(78	)		(49	)		—			(6	)
Home equity		(2,015	)		—			—			—			—
Consumer		(28	)		(9	)		(13	)		(73	)		(33	)
Total charged-off		(8,192	)		(622	)		(3,911	)		(45,379	)		(29,170	)
Recoveries of loans charged-off:
Commercial:
Commercial		663			664			6,017			1,995			1,124
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate		307			352			1,769			1,806			116
Commercial real estate construction		531			—			89			—			—
Consumer:
Residential real estate		7			—			23			—			(1	)
Home equity		62			—			—			—			—
Consumer		9			14			13			40			51
Total recoveries		1,579			1,030			7,911			3,841			1,290
Net loans recovered (charged-off)		(6,613	)		408			4,000			(41,538	)		(27,880	)
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses		6,413			(4,384	)		(8,669	)		16,707			50,506
Balance at end of year	$	20,706		$	20,906		$	24,882		$	29,551		$	54,382
Ratios

44

	Years Ended December 31,
		2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		3.48	%		4.00	%		4.83	%		3.96	%		4.42	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing		109.37			94.37			59.06			47.08			96.85
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans:
Commercial		0.45			(1.19	)		(4.06	)		10.00			2.25
Commercial real estate and commercial real estate construction		1.02			0.03			0.13			1.72			2.02
Residential real estate, home equity and consumer		1.92			0.13			0.11			0.10			(0.03	)
Total loans		1.14			(0.08	)		(0.67	)		4.06			2.04
Ratio of recoveries to loans charged-off		19.27			165.59			202.28			8.46			4.42
Total loans	$	595,259		$	522,624		$	515,544		$	746,615		$	1,231,412
Average total loans		582,559			525,158			594,714			1,023,092			1,366,902

45

The following table sets forth CIB Marine’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses by type of loan as of the dates indicated.

TOTAL COMPANY-CONTINUING AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

	December 31,
	2007					2006					2005					2004					2003
	Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category			Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category			Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category			Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category			Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial	$	2,233		3.54	%	$	3,024		6.08	%	$	4,165		6.03	%	$	10,080		5.22	%	$	48,504		6.85	%
Factored receivables		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			355		3.10
Commercial real estate		6,769		2.62			12,859		4.56			17,721		5.48			16,211		4.02			48,813		4.12
Commercial real estate construction		5,134		3.68			2,383		2.15			2,193		2.45			2,258		2.07			9,456		2.60
Residential real estate		635		2.95			625		3.25			433		2.17			871		2.82			2,027		2.36
Home equity loans		5,862		5.40			1,928		3.32			292		2.32			83		1.10			104		0.85
Consumer loans		73		2.26			87		3.65			78		3.58			48		2.26			47		1.32
Unallocated		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			566		—
Total allowance	$	20,706		3.47	%	$	20,906		4.00	%	$	24,882		4.83	%	$	29,551		3.96	%	$	109,872		4.66	%

CIB MARINE-CONTINUING OPERATIONS ONLY:

	December 31,
	2007					2006					2005					2004					2003
	Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category			Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category			Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category			Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category			Allowance Amount		% of Loans in each category
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial	$	2,233		3.54	%	$	3,024		6.08	%	$	4,165		6.03	%	$	10,080		5.22	%	$	28,450		6.83	%
Commercial real estate		6,769		2.62			12,859		4.56			17,721		5.48			16,211		4.02			19,858		3.69
Commercial real estate construction		5,134		3.68			2,383		2.15			2,193		2.45			2,258		2.07			4,098		2.00
Residential real estate		635		3.03			625		3.25			433		2.17			871		2.82			1,722		2.73
Home equity loans		5,862		5.40			1,928		3.32			292		2.32			83		1.10			88		0.89
Consumer loans		73		2.26			87		3.65			78		3.58			48		2.26			43		1.42
Unallocated		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			123		—
Total allowance	$	20,706		3.48	%	$	20,906		4.00	%	$	24,882		4.83	%	$	29,551		3.96	%	$	54,382		4.42	%

Nonperforming Assets and Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing

The level of nonperforming assets is an important element in assessing CIB Marine’s asset quality and the associated risk in its loan portfolio. Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and foreclosed property. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when CIB Marine determines that it is probable that principal and interest amounts will not be collected according to the terms of the loan agreement. A loan is classified as restructured when a concession is granted to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties that would not otherwise be considered. CIB Marine may restructure the loan by modifying the terms to reduce or defer cash payments required by the borrower, reduce the interest rate below current market rates for new debt with similar risk, reduce the face amount of the debt, or reduce the accrued interest. Foreclosed property represents properties acquired by CIB Marine as a result of loan defaults by customers.

46

The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Marine’s nonperforming assets, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, and related asset quality ratios as of the dates indicated.

TOTAL COMPANY-CONTINUING AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

	December 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming assets
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial	$	1,855		$	3,881		$	6,426		$	25,431		$	58,161
Commercial real estate		2,814			16,110			21,148			23,020			77,960
Commercial real estate construction		11,378			142			1,149			5,399			13,310
Residential real estate		393			536			379			477			2,622
Home equity loans		2,416			—			—			—			—
Consumer loans		10			—			3			—			11
Total nonaccrual loans		18,866			20,669			29,105			54,327			152,064
Foreclosed property		1,344			102			2,931			3,038			40,715
Restructured loans		—			—			1,486			1,536			2,946
Total nonperforming assets	$	20,210		$	20,771		$	33,522		$	58,901		$	195,725
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing
Commercial	$	—		$	100		$	589		$	1,009		$	—
Commercial real estate		19			1,385			2,962			5,902			352
Commercial real estate construction		—			—			7,991			—			—
Residential real estate		—			—			—			—			—
Home equity loans		47			—			—			—			—
Consumer loans		—			—			—			—			7
Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing	$	66		$	1,485		$	11,542		$	6,911		$	359
Allowance for loan losses	$	20,706		$	20,906		$	24,882		$	29,551		$	109,872
Loans at end of period	$	595,861		$	522,724		$	515,544		$	746,615		$	2,360,041
Ratios
Nonaccrual loans to total loans		3.17	%		3.95	%		5.65	%		7.28	%		6.44	%
Foreclosed properties to total assets		0.13			0.01			0.26			0.22			1.28
Nonperforming assets to total assets		2.01			2.08			2.94			4.25			6.14

Nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total loans	3.18	4.24	8.17	8.41	6.58
Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total assets	2.02	2.23	3.96	4.75	6.15

CIB MARINE-CONTINUING OPERATIONS ONLY (1):

	December 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming assets
Nonzaccrual loans:
Commercial	$	1,855		$	3,881		$	6,426		$	25,431		$	34,156
Commercial real estate		2,814			16,110			21,148			23,020			16,099
Commercial real estate construction		11,378			142			1,149			5,399			189
Residential real estate		393			536			379			477			2,397
Home equity loans		2,416			—			—			—			—
Consumer loans		10			—			3			—			10
Total nonaccrual loans		18,866			20,669			29,105			54,327			52,851
Foreclosed property		1,344			102			2,931			2,938			3,027
Restructured loans		—			—			1,486			1,536			2,939
Total nonperforming assets	$	20,210		$	20,771		$	33,522		$	58,801		$	58,817
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing
Commercial	$	—		$	100		$	589		$	1,009		$	—
Commercial real estate		19			1,385			2,962			5,902			352
Commercial real estate construction		—			—			7,991			—			—
Residential real estate		—			—			—			—			—
Home equity loans		47			—			—			—			—
Consumer loans		—			—			—			—			7
Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing	$	66		$	1,485		$	11,542		$	6,911		$	359
Allowance for loan losses	$	20,706		$	20,906		$	24,882		$	29,551		$	54,382
Loans at end of period	$	595,259		$	522,624		$	515,544		$	746,615		$	1,227,734
Ratios
Nonaccrual loans to total loans		3.17	%		3.95	%		5.65	%		7.28	%		4.29	%
Foreclosed properties to total assets		0.13			0.01			0.26			0.21			0.18
Nonperforming assets to total assets		2.01			2.09			2.96			4.29			3.45

47

		December 31,
		2007	2006	2005	2004	2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total loans		3.18	4.24	8.17	8.41	4.56
Nonperforming assets and 90 days or more past due and still accruing loans to total assets		2.02	2.24	3.98	4.79	3.47

(1) For comparative purposes, all periods presented exclude the assets of all companies held for disposal at December 31, 2007 and companies that were sold during prior periods.

Nonaccrual loans decreased $1.8 million, or 8.7%, from $20.7 million at December 31, 2006 to $18.9 million at December 31, 2007 and the ratio of nonaccrual loans to total loans decreased from 3.95% at December 31, 2006 to 3.17% at December 31, 2007. The decrease was mainly due to payments, an $0.8 million charge-off of the remaining balance of one borrowing relationship classified as nonaccrual at December 31, 2006 and the acquisition of the properties securing another borrowing relationship which had $2.0 million of nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2006. Of this $2.0 million borrowing relationship, $0.1 million was paid down, $1.1 million fair market value of the underlying properties was transferred to foreclosed properties and the remaining balance was charged-off. Foregone interest on nonaccrual loans reduced interest income by $1.5 million in 2007, $2.0 million in 2006 and $2.7 million in 2005.

At December 31, 2007, seven commercial borrowing relationships accounted for $14.2 million, or approximately 75.3%, of nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2007. The seven commercial borrowing relationships consisted of the following:

· Commercial real estate construction loan in the amount of $3.6 million to a borrower secured by partially developed land. As of December 31, 2007, specific reserves of $1.6 million were allocated to this borrowing relationship.

· Commercial real estate loan in the amount of $3.2 million to a borrower secured by a first mortgage on a residential and commercial property. There are $0.3 million of specific reserves allocated and no charge-offs have been taken for this relationship. Additionally, CIB Marine had an investment in the common and preferred capital of a limited liability corporation engaged in the development of owner-occupied housing in qualified low-income communities related to this commercial real estate borrowing relationship. During 2007, CIB Marine deemed its investment was impaired. See the other assets discussion for further information regarding this investment.

· Commercial real estate loan in the amount of $2.1 million to a borrower secured by a first mortgage on a residential land development. As of December 31, 2007 no specific reserves were allocated to this borrowing relationship.

· Commercial real estate construction loan in the amount of $1.9 million to a borrower secured by partially developed land. As of December 31, 2007, specific reserves of $0.3 million were allocated to this borrowing relationship.

· Commercial real estate loans totaling $1.5 million to a borrower secured by first mortgages on three commercial warehouse properties. As of December 31, 2007, no specific reserves were allocated to this relationship and $0.9 million was charged-off. In January 2008, this loan was paid in full and amounts previously charged-off were recovered.

· Commercial real estate loan in the amount of $1.0 million to a borrower secured by a first mortgage on a commercial property. As of December 31, 2007 there were no specific reserves allocated to this borrowing relationship and $1.7 million was charged off.

· Commercial real estate loan to a borrower in the amount of $0.9 million secured by a leasehold interest in a commercial property. As of December 31, 2007, specific reserves of $0.9 million were allocated to this borrowing relationship and $4.4 million was charged off.

While CIB Marine believes that the value of the collateral securing the above nonaccrual loans approximates the net book value of the loans, CIB Marine cannot provide assurances that the value will be maintained or that there will be no further losses with respect to these loans.

On December 31, 2007, $2.4 million, or 3.3% of the combined outstanding balance of the home equity pools purchased in June 2006 and February 2007 were classified as nonaccrual. Beginning in the third quarter of 2007, the quality of the two loan pool purchases deteriorated in part due to the deterioration in the housing markets and the sudden and significant tightening of credit standards and reduction in credit availability in the mortgage finance markets. At December 31, 2007, the balance of these two home equity pools was $73.0 million and loss reserves allocated to these two pools totaled $5.3 million.

48

Foreclosed properties were $1.3 million at December 31, 2007 and consisted of one residential property and five commercial properties. At December 31, 2006, foreclosed properties were $0.1 million and consisted of one residential property and one commercial property. All foreclosed properties were held for sale. Two commercial properties accounted for $1.1 million of the balance of foreclosed properties at December 31, 2007. These two properties related to one borrowing relationship and are located in Illinois. The properties were acquired in 2007 through deeds in lieu of foreclosure.

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest are loans which are delinquent with respect to the contractual payment terms of principal and/or interest, but which management believes all contractual principal and interest amounts due will be collected. CIB Marine had $0.1 million in loans that were 90 days or more past due and still accruing at December 31, 2007 compared to $1.5 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in loans classified as 90 days or more past due and still accruing at December 31, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 was primarily due to loans being brought current. Accrued interest on loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing was nominal at December 31, 2007 and $0.01 million at December 31, 2006.

Regulatory Matters

In May 2004, Central Illinois Bank and Marine Bank entered into Cease and Desist Orders (“Orders”) with banking regulators. During 2005 and 2007, respectively, the Orders at Marine Bank and Central Illinois Bank were each replaced with a Memorandum of Understanding (“Memoranda”). During the period in which the Orders and Memoranda were in effect, the banks agreed to maintain a Tier 1 capital level equal to or exceeding 8% of the bank’s total average assets as calculated in accordance with 12 C.F.R. Part 325 of the FDIC rules and regulations (“Part 325”). Also, unless prior written consent was received from the regulators, the banks agreed to restrict their asset and loan growth to no more than 2% during any consecutive three-month period and suspend the declaration or payment of dividends without regulatory approval. The Central Illinois Memorandum was terminated in December 2007 and the Marine Memorandum was terminated in January 2008.

In May 2004, CIB Marine entered into a Written Agreement (“Agreement”) with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. The Agreement imposed certain restrictions and reporting requirements on CIB Marine and required various actions to be taken. The items included, among others:

· Maintenance of minimum capital levels;

· Restrictions on dividend payments and redemption of shares of CIB Marine without regulatory approval;

· Adoption of a comprehensive plan to improve earnings;

· Development of a plan to correct and prevent violations of banking laws and regulations related to affiliate transactions;

· Restrictions on distribution of interest or dividends on its trust preferred securities without regulatory approval;

· Restrictions on borrowings and debt, including debt to stockholders, without regulatory approval.

The Written Agreement will remain in effect until it is stayed, modified, terminated, or suspended by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

Companies Held For Disposal

At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal include the remaining assets and liabilities of Canron and MSI and the tax liability of MICR. MICR and Canron were acquired in full or partial satisfaction of loans. Banking regulations limit the holding period for assets not considered to be permissible banking activities and which have been acquired in satisfaction of debt previously contracted to five years, unless extended. Both MICR and CIB Construction are subject to this restriction. MICR was dissolved in January 2008, and CIB Marine received an extension from the banking regulators to hold Canron until June 30, 2008. Net income of companies held for disposal is included in income from discontinued operations for all periods presented. Additionally, liabilities of companies held for disposal include a tax exposure liability relating to a subsidiary sold in 2004. The amount of this tax exposure liability was $1.7 million and $1.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. See the income taxes discussion for further information on this tax liability exposure.

49

CIB Construction (includes Canron)

In August 2005, Canron authorized and began liquidation distributions to its shareholders and in December 2006, Canron filed Articles of Dissolution. During 2007, Canron continued to collect both on and off-balance sheet receivables and settle and resolve payables and claims through the voluntary liquidation process.

The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Construction’s consolidated balance sheets. The balance sheets reflect current expectations of liquidation values:

	December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash on deposit at CIB Marine	$	23		$	50
Accounts receivable		551			551
Other assets		609			2,649
Total assets	$	1,183		$	3,250
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity:
Income tax payable	$	1,409		$	3,082
Other liabilities		956			1,477
Total liabilities		2,365			4,559
Stockholder’s equity		(1,182	)		(1,309	)
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	1,183		$	3,250

MICR

During the fourth quarter of 2005, CIB Marine sold to unrelated parties substantially all of the assets and operations of MICR and changed the company’s name to Everett Tech, Inc. CIB Marine is in the process of winding down the remaining affairs of this company. At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, the remaining net liabilities of MICR consisted of income taxes payable. MICR filed Articles of Dissolution in January 2008.

MSI

During 2007, CIB Marine continued to wind down the remaining affairs of MSI. MSI’s operations and substantially all its assets were sold in the third quarter of 2004, resulting in a pretax loss of $0.7 million. MSI has incurred certain liabilities including repurchase obligations relative to certain mortgage loans as a result of external fraud and/or documentation issues and certain reporting penalties. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, MSI had net income of $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.04 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes the composition of MSI’s balance sheets which reflect expected liquidation values net of selling costs.

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash on deposit at CIB Marine	$	45	$	14
Net loans		602		100
Income tax receivable		86		685
Other assets		8		1
Total assets	$	741	$	800
Liabilities and stockholder’s equity:
Loans payable to CIB Marine	$	612	$	103
Other liabilities		44		553
Total liabilities		656		656
Stockholder’s equity		85		144
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	741	$	800

50

Other Assets

The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Marine’s other assets:

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost	$	12,298	$	12,314
Prepaid expenses		1,020		1,067
Accounts receivable		179		1,508
Trust preferred securities underwriting fee, net of amortization		1,280		1,335
Investment in trust common securities		3,022		2,838
Other investments		1,381		2,821
Income tax receivable		2,737		3,492
Fair value of derivative		39		—
Other		121		116
	$	22,077	$	25,491

The major components of other investments are as follows:

· Investments in limited partnership interests in various affordable housing partnerships, which had a carrying value of $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, at December 31, 2007 and 2006. Equity loss on these limited partnerships, included in noninterest expense, was $0.2 million in 2007 and $0.4 million in 2006. CIB Marine has engaged in these transactions to provide additional qualified investments under the Community Reinvestment Act and to receive related income tax credits. The partnerships provide affordable housing to low-income residents within CIB Marine’s markets and other locations.

· Investment in the common and preferred capital of a limited liability corporation engaged in the development of owner-occupied housing in qualified low-income communities. The carrying value of this investment was zero and $0.7 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During 2007, CIB Marine deemed the entire investment was impaired, and an impairment loss of $0.7 million was recognized in 2007. The impairment loss is included in write down and losses on assets.

· Interest in a company operating as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended. CIB Marine committed to a $0.5 million investment in this company and as of December 31, 2007 has invested $0.4 million. During each of 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine received a total capital distribution of $0.2 million on its investment in this company. During 2005, CIB Marine recognized a $0.1 million impairment loss on this investment due to a reduction in CIB Marine’s interest in the equity value of this investment. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine’s carrying value of this investment was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

· During the first quarter of 2007, CIB Marine sold its interest in a publicly traded company and recognized a $0.2 million gain on the sale. CIB Marine’s carrying value of this investment at December 31, 2006 was $0.4 million.

As members of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks are required to maintain minimum amounts of Federal Reserve stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock as required by those institutions. These securities are “restricted” in that they are not publicly traded and can only be owned by members of the institutions.

51

In 2005, the FHLB Chicago Board disclosed its decision to discontinue redemption of excess, or voluntary, capital stock. Voluntary stock is stock held by members beyond the amount required as a condition of membership or to support advance borrowings. In April 2006, the FHLB Chicago announced plans to facilitate limited stock redemption requests from its members by issuing bonds. During 2006, the FHLB Chicago issued a limited amount of bonds to facilitate voluntary capital stock redemptions and CIB Marine sold back $14.3 million or 55.6% of its holdings. This represented approximately 58.7% of the stock CIB Marine requested to be redeemed at that time. In October 2007, the FHLB Chicago entered into a consensual Cease and Desist Order (“C&D”) with its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Board (“Finance Board”). The C&D states that the Finance Board has determined that requiring the FHLB Chicago to take the actions specified in the C&D will improve the condition and practices of the FHLB Chicago, stabilize its capital, and provide the FHLB Chicago an opportunity to address the principal supervisory concerns identified by the Finance Board. Under the terms of the C&D, capital stock repurchases and redemptions, including redemptions upon membership withdrawal or other termination, are prohibited unless the Bank has received approval of the Director of the Office of Supervision of the Finance Board ("OS Director"). The C&D provides that the OS Director may approve a written request by the FHLB Chicago for proposed redemptions or repurchases if the OS Director determines that allowing the redemption or repurchase would be consistent with maintaining the capital adequacy of the FHLB Chicago and its continued safe and sound operations. The C&D also provides that dividend declarations are subject to the prior written approval of the OS Director and that the FHLB Chicago must submit a Capital Structure Plan to the Finance Board consistent with the requirements of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and Finance Board regulations. The FHLB Chicago did not declare any dividends for the last half of 2007. As of December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had $11.5 million in FHLB Chicago stock, of which $4.0 million was categorized as required.

Deposits

Average total deposits decreased $93.7 million, or 10.9%, from $857.8 million in 2006 to $764.1 million in 2007. The ratio of total average deposits to average earning assets was 80.8% in 2007, 84.5% in 2006 and 86.7% in 2005. The decrease in average deposits was mainly due to branch sales and CIB Marine’s liquidity management strategy. As part of its strategy, CIB Marine sought to decrease funding from higher cost deposits and increase funding with lower cost short-term borrowings. At the time of sale, the combined deposits of branches sold during 2007 and 2006 approximated $49.7 million and $64.3 million, respectively. See the deposits and assets held for sale discussion for further information on deposits sold.

The following tables set forth the average amount of, and average rate paid on, deposit categories for the periods indicated.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2007								2006								2005
	Average Balance		% of Total Deposits			Average Rate			Average Balance		% of Total Deposits			Average Rate			Average Balance		% of Total Deposits			Average Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-bearing demand	$	36,132		4.73	%		1.00	%	$	43,001		5.01	%		0.99	%	$	55,764		5.28	%		1.13	%
Money market		170,966		22.37			4.10			194,290		22.65			3.97			210,366		19.94			2.47
Other savings		15,224		1.99			0.99			21,839		2.54			1.00			35,382		3.35			1.16
Time deposits		466,151		61.01			4.75			507,013		59.11			4.12			641,274		60.77			3.24
Total interest-bearing deposits		688,473		90.10			4.31			766,143		89.31			3.82			942,786		89.34			2.86
Noninterest-bearing		75,670		9.90			—			91,668		10.69			—			112,470		10.66			—
Total deposits	$	764,143		100.00	%		3.89	%	$	857,811		100.00	%		3.41	%	$	1,055,256		100.00	%		2.56	%

Average interest-bearing deposits as a percentage of average total deposits were 90.1% in 2007, 89.3% in 2006 and 89.3% in 2005. Time deposits represent the largest component of interest-bearing deposit liabilities. The percentage of average time deposits to average total interest-bearing deposits was 67.7% in 2007, 66.2% in 2006, and 68.0% in 2005. These percentages reflect CIB Marine’s significant reliance on time deposits as a source of funding. Average interest-bearing demand deposits decreased $6.9 million or 16.0% in 2007 compared to 2006, and other savings accounts decreased $6.6 million or 30.3%, while average time deposits declined $40.9 million, or 8.1% and average money market accounts decreased $23.3 million or 12.0%. Average noninterest-bearing demand deposits also decreased by $16.0 million, or 17.5%, in 2007.

Total time deposits of $100,000 or more, excluding deposits of branches held for sale, were $169.0 million, or approximately 36% of time deposits at December 31, 2007 and $126.1 million or 28.8% of total time deposits at December 31, 2006. Brokered time deposits, excluding deposits of branches held for sale, were $22.2 million or 4.8% of total time deposits at December 31, 2007 and $39.2 million or 9.0% of total time deposits at December 31, 2006. CIB Marine issues brokered time deposits periodically to meet short-term funding needs and/or when their related costs are at or below those being offered on other deposits.

52

The following table provides information on the maturity distribution of time deposits of $100,000 or more.

	December 31, 2007
	(Dollars in
	thousands)
Maturity
3 months or less	$	74,541
Over 3 through 6 months		37,046
Over 6 through 12 months		35,781
Over 12 months		21,603
	$	168,971

Deposits and assets of branches held for sale

At December 31, 2006, CIB Marine’s subsidiary bank Marine Bank held for sale the deposits and property and equipment of its Cedarburg and Brookfield, Wisconsin branches. The deposits and property and equipment of these two branches comprised the balance of assets and deposits of branches held for sale as of December 31, 2006. During the first half of 2007, Marine Bank sold the deposits and property and equipment of these two branches and recognized a net pretax gain on the sale of $1.1 million. The gain is included in net gain on sale of assets and deposits. At the dates of sale, the deposits and net property and equipment of these sold branches were $49.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Additionally, goodwill of $0.7 million was allocated to the Cedarburg branch.

During 2006, certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks sold the deposits and certain assets of six of their branches and recognized a total net pretax gain of $2.7 million. The gain on the sales of the branches is included in net gain on sale of assets and deposits. Four of the sold branches were located in Illinois, one in Wisconsin and one in Nebraska. Goodwill of $0.2 million was allocated to the Wisconsin branch. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2006, CIB Marine sold a former branch building located in Bloomington, Illinois at no gain or loss.

During the first quarter of 2005, CIB Marine recognized a $0.2 million impairment loss on the Bloomington building based on its market value, and in the fourth quarter of 2005, CIB Marine sold the deposits, property and equipment of its branch located in Sebring Florida and recognized a pretax gain of $0.3 million. The net gain on the sale of the Sebring branch deposits, property and equipment and the impairment loss on the Bloomington building are included in other noninterest expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

CIB Marine continues to evaluate the effectiveness of its subsidiary banking networks which could result in the sale or closure of certain other subsidiary bank branches.

Borrowings

CIB Marine also uses various types of borrowings to meet liquidity needs and/or fund asset growth, when the pricing on these borrowings is more favorable than deposits.

During 2007, the availability of federal funds purchased by certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks with correspondent banks continued to be contingent on bank pledges of fixed income investment securities. The credit restrictions in effect at December 31, 2006 at the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window were lifted in the first quarter of 2007.

In 2004, CIB Marine entered into a Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Among other items, the Written Agreement requires CIB Marine to obtain Federal Reserve Bank approval before incurring additional borrowings or debt.

53

The following tables set forth information regarding selected categories of borrowings as of the dates indicated.

Short-Term Borrowings	At Year end								For the Year
	Balance		Weighted- Average Rate			% of Total Borrowings			Daily Average Balances		Weighted- Average Rate			Highest Balances at Month End
	(Dollars in thousands)
2007
Federal funds purchased	$	—		—	%		—	%	$	2,400		5.26	%	$	12,811
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		16,276		3.17			10.21			21,012		4.11			27,016
Federal Home Loan Bank		67,100		3.90			42.08			15,044		4.35			67,100
Treasury, tax and loan note		2,240		3.59			1.40			872		5.68			2,848
Total short-term borrowings	$	85,616		3.76	%		55.69	%	$	39,328		4.31	%
2006
Federal funds purchased	$	2,057		5.31	%		2.25	%	$	1,683		5.18	%	$	3,800
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		21,568		4.74			23.57			17,426		4.12			21,567
Federal Home Loan Bank		—		—			—			3,088		5.57			12,000
Treasury, tax and loan note		4,028		5.04			4.40			718		4.47			4,028
Total short-term borrowings	$	27,653		4.83	%		50.22	%	$	22,915		4.40	%
2005
Federal funds purchased	$	297		4.13	%		0.32	%	$	865		2.98	%	$	3,215
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		20,684		3.46			21.98			23,863		3.00			43,879
Federal Home Loan Bank		—		—			—			—		—			—
Treasury, tax and loan note		4,020		4.06			4.27			905		5.93			4,028
Total short-term borrowings	$	25,001		3.56	%		26.57	%	$	25,633		3.10	%

	As of December 31,
	2007						2006						2005
Long-Term Borrowings	Balance		Average Rate		% of Total Borrowings		Balance		Average Rate		% of Total Borrowings		Balance		Average Rate		% of Total Borrowings
	(Dollars in thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank		12,000		4.52		7.52		2,000		5.09		2.19		7,250		4.99		7.70
Junior subordinated debentures		61,857		9,89		38.79		61,857		9,94		67.59		61,857		9.49		65.73
Total long-term borrowings		73,857		9.02		46.31		63,857		9.78		69.78		69,107		9.01		73.43

CIB Marine utilizes various types of borrowings to meet liquidity needs, fund asset growth and/or when the pricing of these borrowings is more favorable than deposits. Total borrowed funds, including junior subordinated debentures, increased $68.0 million from $91.5 million at December 31, 2006 to $159.5 million at December 31, 2007 and represented 9.5% and 16.3%, respectively, of earning assets. The majority of the increase occurred in short-term borrowings which increased $58.0 million from December 31, 2006 compared to December 31, 2007, while long-term borrowing increased $10.0 million during the same period. Short term advances and draws on a line of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank accounted for the majority of the increase and was primarily due to additional funding needs resulting from an increase in interest earning assets and the sale of deposits in conjunction with the sale of certain branches. The company chose to meet funding needs through the increased FHLB borrowings due to the relative cost advantage of these borrowings over other funding sources such as retail or brokered deposits.

Junior Subordinated Debentures and Guaranteed Trust Preferred Securities

CIB Marine formed four statutory business trusts (“Trusts”) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and investing the proceeds thereof in junior subordinated debentures of CIB Marine. The trust preferred securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CIB Marine. The Trusts used the proceeds from issuing trust preferred securities and the issuance of its common securities to CIB Marine to purchase the junior subordinated debentures. Interest on the junior subordinated debentures and distributions on the trust preferred securities are payable either quarterly or semi-annually in arrears. Pursuant to its 2004 Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, CIB Marine is not permitted to pay any interest on the trust preferred securities without prior approval of the FRB. See Regulatory Matters for further discussion. CIB Marine has the right, at any time, as long as there are no continuing events of default, to defer payments of interest on the junior subordinated debentures for consecutive periods not exceeding twenty consecutive quarters, but not beyond the stated maturity of the junior subordinated debentures. CIB Marine has elected to defer all interest payments starting in 2004. Throughout the deferral period, interest on the debentures continues to accrue. In addition, interest also accrues on all interest that was not paid when due, compounded quarterly or semi-annually. During the deferral period, CIB Marine may not pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, or acquire, or make liquidation payment on its stock, or make any payment on principal, interest or premium, or redeem any similar debt securities of CIB Marine, subject to limitations. During 2007 CIB Marine deferred interest payments on its $61.9 million junior subordinated debentures and as a result the Trusts deferred distributions on their $60.0 million preferred securities. CIB Marine had accrued interest payable on its junior subordinated debentures of $21.8 million and $30.3 million at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the junior subordinated debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption. The $61.9 million junior subordinated debt, net of CIB Marine’s $1.9 million initial investment in the Trusts, qualify as regulatory capital for CIB Marine subject to regulatory limitations. At December 31, 2007, approximately $20.1 million of the $60.0 million qualified as Tier 1 capital and the remaining $39.9 million qualified as Tier 2 capital.

54

In September 2002, CIB Marine issued $20.0 million in guaranteed trust preferred securities at a variable rate of interest based upon the three-month LIBOR plus 3.40%. The interest rate was 8.63% at December 31, 2007. The securities are mandatorily redeemable upon their maturity on September 27, 2032 and are callable by the issuer beginning September 30, 2007 at par value. Issuance costs of $0.5 million were incurred in connection with these securities. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over thirty years. CIB Marine used the net proceeds of $19.5 million for general corporate purposes.

In February 2001, CIB Marine issued $15.0 million in guaranteed trust preferred securities at a fixed rate of 10.20% per annum. The securities are mandatorily redeemable upon their maturity on February 22, 2031, and are callable by the issuer beginning February 22, 2011, at a premium, which declines ratably to par by February 22, 2021. Issuance costs of $0.5 million were incurred in connection with these securities. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over thirty years. CIB Marine used the net proceeds of $14.5 million for general corporate purposes.

In September 2000, CIB Marine issued $15.0 million in guaranteed trust preferred securities at a fixed rate of 10.60% per annum. The securities are mandatorily redeemable upon their maturity on September 7, 2030, and are callable by the issuer beginning September 7, 2010, at a premium, which declines ratably to par by September 7, 2020. Issuance costs of $0.5 million were incurred in connection with these securities. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over thirty years. CIB Marine used the net proceeds of $14.5 million for general corporate purposes.

In March 2000, CIB Marine issued $10.0 million in guaranteed trust preferred securities at a fixed rate of 10.88% per annum. The securities are mandatorily redeemable upon their maturity on March 8, 2030, and are callable by the issuer beginning March 8, 2010, at a premium, which declines ratably to par by March 8, 2020. Issuance costs of $0.3 million were incurred in connection with these securities. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over thirty years. CIB Marine used the net proceeds of $9.7 million for general corporate purposes.

Other Liabilities

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Accounts payable	$	117	$	1,408
Accrual for unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit		725		725
Accrued real estate taxes		158		159
Accrued compensation and employee benefits		782		973
Accrued professional fees		448		1,070
Accrued other expenses		731		2,645
Fair value of derivatives		—		29
Other liabilities		258		360
	$	3,219	$	7,369

Other liabilities decreased $4.2 million from $7.4 million at December 31, 2006 to $3.2 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.8 million contingent liability and a $1.0 million payable for assets purchased in December 2006 that settled in January 2007. The contingent liability related to the settlement of the Hadley litigation. CIB Marine recorded the contingent liability in the first quarter of 2006 and settled it in the first quarter of 2007. See Item 3-Legal Proceedings in Part I of this Form 10-K for further information regarding this litigation.

55

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the ordinary course of business, CIB Marine engages in financial transactions that are not recorded on its consolidated balance sheets, are recorded in amounts that are different than their full principal or notional amount, or are subsidiaries of CIB Marine that are presented on an equity basis rather than consolidated. Such transactions serve a variety of purposes including management of CIB Marine’s interest rate risk, liquidity and credit concentration risks, optimization of capital utilization, and meeting the needs of its customers.

Commitments:

As a financial services provider, CIB Marine routinely enters into commitments to extend credit, including loan commitments, lines of credit, and standby and commercial letters of credit. While these contractual obligations may represent future cash requirements of CIB Marine, some of these commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process as other loans made by CIB Marine. See Item 8, Note 17-Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk in Part II of this Form 10-K for additional information.

Derivative Financial Instruments:

CIB Marine utilizes derivatives primarily in its asset/liability management activities to modify the existing market risk characteristics of certain assets and liabilities. During 2007, CIB Marine’s derivatives were predominately interest rate swaps. An interest rate swap agreement involves the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest payment obligations based on the underlying notional principal amounts. The amounts subject to market and credit risks are the streams of interest payments under the agreements and not the notional principal amounts, which are used only to express the volume of the transactions. The fair value of each derivative instrument, however, is recorded on the balance sheet as an asset or liability. CIB Marine’s credit risk on a swap agreement is limited to nonperformance of the counterparty’s obligations under the terms of the swap agreement. CIB Marine deals exclusively with counterparties that have high credit ratings, and based on management’s assessments, all counterparties were expected to meet any outstanding obligations as of December 31, 2007. For additional information regarding CIB Marine’s interest rate swaps at December 31, 2007, including the off-balance sheet notional amount and fair value which is the carrying value, see Item 8, Note 17-Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risks and Note 22-Fair Value of Financial Instruments in Part II of this Form 10-K.

Trust Preferred Securities:

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had a $1.9 million investment in the common securities of the Trusts. CIB Marine has also issued $61.9 million in junior subordinated debentures to the Trusts, which are outstanding at December 31, 2007. The Trusts have a total of $60.0 million in preferred securities outstanding which were issued to non-affiliated investors. See Item 7-Junior Subordinated Debentures and Guaranteed Trust Preferred Securities discussion and Item 8, Note 12-Long-Term Borrowings in Part II of this Form 10-K for further information.

Residential Mortgage Recourse Obligations:

CIB Marine has contracted with residential mortgage loan investors to repurchase or make the investor whole on losses incurred on residential mortgage loans purchased from CIB Marine and which were not in compliance or otherwise represented a material breach of agreement between CIB Marine and the investor. The amount of unsettled repurchase and make whole obligations as of December 31, 2007 is $0.1 million. At December 31, 2007, liabilities of companies held for sale included a $0.1 million contingent liability related to these obligations. See Item 8, Note 7-Companies Held For Disposal and Discontinued Operations-MSI in Part II of this Form 10-K for additional information.

56

Contractual obligations

The following table summarizes the Company’s more significant contractual obligations at December 31, 2007. Excluded from the following table are a number of obligations to be settled in cash. These excluded items are reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and include deposits with no stated maturity, trade payables, accrued interest payable and derivative payables that do not require physical delivery of the underlying instrument. The table does not include interest.

	Total		Less than 1 year		1-2 years		2-3 years		3-4 years		4-5 years		More than 5 years
Certificate of deposit and other time deposit obligations	$	463,901	$	375,807	$	49,005	$	15,198	$	9,577	$	14,135	$	179
Long-term debt		12,000		—		9,000		3,000		—		—		—
Junior subordinated debentures		61,857		—		—		—		—		—		61,857
Operating leases		3,328		1,192		862		573		359		295		47
Total	$	541,086	$	376,999	$	58,867	$	18,771	$	9,936	$	14,430	$	62,083

Liquidity

The objective of liquidity risk management is to ensure that CIB Marine has adequate funding capacity to fund commitments to extend credit, deposit account withdrawals, maturities of borrowings, and other obligations in a timely manner. CIB Marine actively manages its liquidity position by estimating, measuring, and monitoring its sources and uses of funds. CIB Marine’s sources of funding and liquidity include both asset and liability components. CIB Marine’s funding requirements are primarily met by the inflow of funds from deposits, loan repayments and investment maturities. CIB Marine also makes use of noncore funding sources in a manner consistent with its liquidity, funding and market risk policies. Noncore funding sources are used to meet funding needs and/or when the pricing and continued availability of these sources presents lower cost funding opportunities. Short-term noncore funding sources utilized by CIB Marine include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, short-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, and short-term brokered and negotiable time deposits. CIB Marine also has established borrowing lines with the Federal Reserve Bank and nonaffiliated banks. Long-term funding sources, other than core deposits, include long-term brokered and negotiable time deposits and long-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Additional sources of liquidity include cash and cash equivalents, federal funds sold, sales of loans held for sale, and the sale of securities.

During 2007, the availability of federal funds purchased by certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks with correspondent banks continued to be contingent on bank pledges of fixed income investment securities. The credit restrictions in effect at December 31, 2006 at the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window were lifted in the first quarter of 2007. Additionally, at September 30, 2007 pursuant to a Written Agreement between CIB Marine and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, CIB Marine must obtain Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago approval before incurring additional borrowings or debt. These restrictions could potentially impact liquidity.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for 2007, 2006 and 2005 contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

CIB Marine’s primary source of funds for 2007 resulted from a $58.0 million net increase in short-term borrowings to meet the funding needs resulting from increased interest earning assets and the sale of deposits in conjunction with branch sales. CIB Marine chose to meet funding needs through short term advances and draws on a line of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank due to the relative cost advantage of these borrowings over other funding sources such as retail or brokered deposits. Other sources of funds resulted from a $21.0 million net decrease in investment securities, a $10.0 million net increase in long-term borrowings and $2.3 million net cash received from the sale of certain branch assets and deposits.

CIB Marine’s primary use of funds for 2007 was a $79.8 million increase in the loan portfolio including the purchase of a fixed rate second lien home equity pool, and $49.7 million of deposits sold.

CIB Marine had liquid assets from continuing operations of $74.8 million and $115.1 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

57

CIB Marine was able to meet its liquidity needs during 2007 and 2006. Beginning in 2004, CIB Marine deferred interest payments on its $61.9 million of junior subordinated debentures and as a result the Trusts deferred distributions on $60.0 million of preferred securities. The deferral period may last as long as 5 years. The primary sources of CIB Marine’s funding are expected to be cash on hand, operating cash flows from the sale of services to subsidiary banks and the sale of other assets owned by CIB Marine. CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks have high levels of liquid assets to meet potentially high liquidity needs at the banks. See also the discussion on CIB Marine’s capital plan which includes its strategy for becoming current on distributions on the trust preferred securities before the first quarter of 2009.

Capital Plan

CIB Marine management has been developing a comprehensive capital plan to pursue the goals of bringing the trust preferred securities interest payments current as soon as possible, maintaining well capitalized capital ratios at all subsidiary banks, and providing the best available outcome for the CIB Marine shareholders, within applicable regulatory constraints.

CIB Marine projects improvement in core earnings at its banking subsidiaries during 2008. However, the consolidated company continued to have significant operating losses through the end of 2007 and projects a loss for 2008 in its operating budget. In addition, interest expense on the $61.9 million of junior subordinated debentures (“Trust Preferred Securities”) is an expense of the parent company, not the individual banks. This interest expense totaled $8.5 million in 2007 and continues to rise as unpaid interest is accrued and added to the principal in calculating future interest accruals. As of December 31, 2007 the accrued and unpaid interest totaled $30.3 million. If it remains unpaid by year end 2008, the accrued and unpaid interest could reach $39.7 million. To bring these interest payments current, cash needs to be raised by CIB Marine, and any proposed interest payment would be subject to regulatory approval by the FRB.

As noted in the Risk Factors section of the Form 10-K, these Trust Preferred Securities’ interest payments are being deferred, and have been deferred since the first quarter of 2004. The maximum deferral period is five years. Therefore, CIB Marine will be required to bring the Trust Preferred Securities’ interest payments current in the first quarter of 2009. While the full consequences of a default on the Trust Preferred Securities is uncertain, CIB Marine believes that any outcome following a default would certainly carry additional risk to CIB Marine’s shareholders of significant deterioration in value of the CIB Marine stock. In addition, the interest rates on these Trust Preferred Securities range between 8.63% and 10.88%, well above current market rates for debt financing. As already noted, these rates are not only imposed on the principal, but on the deferred interest as well.

Therefore, for the combined goal of bringing the Trust Preferred Securities’ interest payments current prior to a default in first quarter of 2009, and improving consolidated CIB Marine earnings through a reduction of interest expense, CIB Marine will evaluate the following options and pursue any which may result in the achievement of these goals. It should be noted that current credit market and general economic conditions could also affect the ability of CIB Marine to execute any or all of these options. In addition, since various aspects of the options listed below are subject to state and/or federal banking regulatory approval, there is no certainty that CIB Marine will be able to pursue any or all of these options.

1. In May 2007 the CIB Marine Board authorized Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (“Stifel Nicolaus”), an investment banking firm based in St. Louis, to seek a buyer for Citrus Bank. After an extensive process to identify all potential buyers, a letter of intent was signed on February 27, 2008 to sell the deposits, branches, and a substantial amount of loans of Citrus Bank. This transaction is ultimately projected to result in a transfer of approximately $20 million in capital from Citrus Bank to CIB Marine, primarily in the form of loans not purchased by the buyer, and a premium to be paid by the buyer.CIB Marine will work with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and the FRB to implement a plan to, as quickly as possible after the closing with the buyer, facilitate the transfer of loans and capital to CIB Marine. CIB Marine will make every attempt to collect on these loans in a timely fashion to provide additional cash to pay down a large portion of the accrued and unpaid interest on the Trust Preferred Securities prior to year end 2008, subject to approval of this use of cash by the FRB. CIB Marine expects that the definitive agreement with respect to the sale of Citrus Bank will be signed early in the second quarter of 2008, and the closing scheduled for 90 to 120 days after signing, subject to customary conditions, including regulatory approval.

58

2. CIB Marine will apply to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions (“WDFI”), and the Illinois Division of Financial and Professional Regulation (“IDFPR”) for permission to transfer $7.5 million in capital from Marine Bank and $17.5 million in capital from Central Illinois Bank to CIB Marine. CIB Marine believes that the regulatory capital of both banks will remain in excess of all regulatory “well-capitalized” guidelines following the proposed capital transfer. If approved, the cash received by CIB Marine in connection with the proposed capital transfer would be used to pay accrued and unpaid interest and/or call and pay up to $20 million of currently callable Trust Preferred Securities. Due to market pressures on bank capital, this strategy may be difficult to execute.

3. As an alternative to point 2 above, to facilitate a transfer of capital from the banks to CIB Marine while maintaining regulatory capital above well-capitalized guidelines at the banks, and to further improve the operating efficiency of CIB Marine, CIB Marine may apply to the appropriate bank regulatory agencies for permission to merge all banking charters into a single charter.

4. CIB Marine has engaged Stifel Nicolaus to assist in evaluating all strategic options, including the sale of CIB Marine in its entirety or any of its parts. However, executing a strategy to sell all or part of a bank holding company or a bank in the current economic and banking environment is expected to be challenging. With respect to selling CIB Marine in its entirety, this challenge could be exacerbated by the uncertainty around the litigation claims CIB Marine currently faces, in addition to the denial of insurance coverage in those lawsuits.

5. CIB Marine will also pursue opportunities with lenders and/or private equity investors, with the assistance of Stifel Nicolaus, to refinance the Trust Preferred Securities if and when feasible.

6. CIB Marine will continue to evaluate opportunities to sell specific branches or branch properties under sale and lease-back type arrangements to raise additional capital and cash.

While working on all of these options, management will continue to focus on improving the efficiency of CIB Marine by:

· focusing on improving revenue through the addition of commercial bankers in our markets as well as other initiatives;

· continuing cost savings initiatives started in 2007 in order to improve operating costs of CIB Marine; and

· focusing on maintaining customer service levels while actively seeking new business opportunities.

59

Capital

CIB Marine and its subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital guidelines. In general, these guidelines define the various components of core capital and assign risk weights to various categories of assets. The risk-based capital guidelines require financial institutions to maintain minimum levels of capital as a percentage of risk weighted assets. The risk-based capital information for CIB Marine is contained in the following table:

	December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Risk-weighted assets	$	743,970		$	674,565		$	704,754
Average assets(1)	$	997,708		$	1,015,809		$	1,174,207
Capital components
Stockholders’ equity	$	60,306		$	71,613		$	79,182
Restricted core capital:
Junior subordinated debentures net of investment in trust		60,000			60,000			60,000
Total restricted core capital elements		60,000			60,000			60,000
Disallowed amounts		(39,898	)		(36,129	)		(33,606	)
Maximum allowable in tier 1 capital		20,102			23,871			26,394
Nonfinancial equity items		—			(34	)		(14	)
Less: disallowed intangibles		—			(746	)		(982	)
Add: unrealized (income) loss on securities		(1,382	)		1,880			3,435
Tier 1 capital		79,026			96,584			108,015
Allowable allowance for loan losses		9,449			8,595			9,008
Allowable subordinated debentures net of investment in trust		39,898			36,129			33,606
Total risk-based capital	$	128,373		$	141,308		$	150,629

	Actual					Minimum Required To be Adequately Capitalized					Minimum Required To be Well Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2007
Total capital to risk weighted assets	$	128,373		17.26	%	$	59,518		8.00	%	$	74,397		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets		79,026		10.62			29,759		4.00			44,638		6.00
Tier 1 leverage to average assets		79,026		7.92			39,908		4.00			49,885		5.00
December 31, 2006
Total capital to risk weighted assets	$	141,308		20.95	%	$	53,965		8.00	%	$	67,456		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets		96,584		14.32			26,983		4.00			40,474		6.00
Tier 1 leverage to average assets		96,584		9.51			40,632		4.00			50,790		5.00
December 31, 2005
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	150,629		21.37	%	$	56,380		8.00	%	$	70,475		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		108,015		15.33			28,190		4.00			42,285		6.00
Tier 1 leverage to average assets		108,015		9.20			46,968		4.00			58,710		5.00

(1) Average assets as calculated in accordance with 12 C.F.R. Part 325 of the FDIC rules and regulations which requires a quarter to date average and allows for current period adjustments of goodwill and other intangible assets.

At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine was subject to a Written Agreement it entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in the second quarter of 2004 and Marine Bank was subject to a Memorandum of Understanding (“Memorandum”) it entered into with the FDIC and its respective banking regulator in March 2005. During the first quarter of 2007, the Cease and Desist Order Central Illinois Bank had entered into with the FDIC and its applicable state banking regulator in 2004 was replaced with a Memorandum of Understanding, and in the fourth quarter of 2007, this Memorandum of Understanding was terminated. Among other items, the Written Agreement and Memorandum in effect at December 31, 2007 restrict the payment of cash dividends without prior written consent from the regulators and require the bank to maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital level equal to or exceeding 8% of the bank’s total average assets. Failure to comply with the Written Agreement or Memorandum could have a material adverse effect on CIB Marine and its operations. As of December 31, 2007, the capital level of CIB Marine and Marine Bank exceeded the minimum levels required by their respective regulatory Written Agreement or Memorandum. As of December 31, 2007, the capital level of CIB Marine and Marine Bank each exceeded the minimum levels required by the respective Written Agreement and Memorandum. See Note 14-Stockholers’ Equity in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

CIB Marine’s stockholders’ equity was $60.3 million or 6.0% of total assets at December 31, 2007 compared to $71.6 million or 7.2% of total assets at December 31, 2006. The decrease during 2007 was primarily due to a net loss of $13.8 million and a $1.0 million adjustment to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings, partially offset by a $3.3 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income. The change in accumulated other comprehensive income resulted from a $1.4 million net unrealized gain on securities held for sale at December 31, 2007 compared to a $1.9 million net unrealized loss at December 31, 2006. The $1.0 million adjustment to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings resulted from CIB Marine’s implementation of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). The adjustment related to CIB Marine’s investment in an Illinois REIT. See Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Item 8, Part II of this Form 10-K for further information on the FIN 48 adjustment.

60

CIB Marine has junior subordinated debentures issued prior to 2003 which, subject to limitations, qualify as Tier 1 equity capital for regulatory capital purposes. See the Junior Subordinated Debentures and Guaranteed Trust Preferred Securities discussion for further information on these borrowings. The FRB adopted a rule limiting the restricted core capital elements, including junior subordinated debentures, net of investment in the trusts, to 25% of all core capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability.

New Accounting Pronouncements

The expected impact of accounting policies recently issued or proposed but not yet required to be adopted are discussed below. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affected CIB Marine’s financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts were discussed in the applicable section of this financial review and the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes

In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 examines an employer’s deductibility of compensation expense for dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings on employee-held, equity-classified nonvested shares, nonvested share units, or outstanding options (“affected securities”). A consensus was reached that an employer should recognize a realized tax benefit associated with dividends on affected securities charged to retained earnings as an increase in additional-paid-in-capital (“APIC”). The amount recognized in APIC should also be included in the APIC pool. Additionally, when an employer’s estimate of forfeitures increases or actual forfeitures exceed its estimates, EITF 06-11 requires the amount of tax benefits previously recognized in APIC to be reclassified into the income statement; however, the amount reclassified is limited to the APIC pool balance on the reclassification date. EITF 06-11 is to be applied prospectively in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal periods. The adoption of EITF 06-11 is not expected to have a material effect on CIB Marine’s consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements

In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. SFAS 157 also expands disclosures about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual reports subsequent to initial recognition. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Adoption of this standard did not materially affect CIB Marine’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and FinancialLiabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items generally on an instrument-by-instrument basis at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS 159 is intended to provide entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This standard did not materially affect CIB Marine’s consolidated financial statements.

61

Consolidations

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 requires companies with noncontrolling interests to disclose such interests clearly as a portion of equity but separate from the parent’s equity. The noncontrolling interest’s portion of net income must also be clearly presented on the Income Statement. SFAS 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscals years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 160 is not expected to have a material effect on CIB Marine’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), Business Combinations (revised 2007) (“SFAS 141 (R)”). SFAS 141 (R) applies the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations established in SFAS 141 to all acquisitions where the acquirer gains a controlling interest, regardless of whether consideration was exchanged. Consistent with SFAS 141, SFAS 141 (R) requires the acquirer to value the assets and liabilities of the acquiree at fair value and record goodwill on bargain purchases, with the main difference being the application to all acquisitions where control is achieved. SFAS 141 (R) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 141 (R) is not expected to have a material effect on CIB Marine’s consolidated financial statements.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

CIB Marine’s consolidated financial statements and notes contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of CIB Marine’s operations. Unlike most industrial companies, nearly all of CIB Marine’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates and changes therein have a greater impact on CIB Marine’s performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Regulatory Orders and Agreements

The Marine Memorandum was terminated in January 2008, after which none of the subsidiary banks were party to any formal or informal regulatory agreement or order.

Late Filing of Tax Returns

CIB Marine did not file all required federal and state tax returns for calendar years 2004, 2005 and 2006 by the required due dates. Although CIB Marine did not report taxable income during these periods, penalties and interest may still be assessed by the Internal Revenue Service and/or applicable state departments of revenue. As of the first quarter of 2008, CIB Marine was current with all its federal and state tax return filings.

Municipal Bond Insurer Rating Downgrades

Since December 31, 2007, due to economic conditions, several nationally recognized rating agencies downgraded the credit ratings of several of the investment grade credit insuring companies. Several of the downgraded companies insure municipal obligation investments owned by CIB Marine. The municipal obligations have a par value of $16.5 million and a fair value of $16.4 million as of December 31, 2007. CIB Marine has not recognized any impairment on these affected municipal obligations and the securities are still considered investment grade quality as rated by the rating agencies.

Loan Pool Purchase

Due to a general decline in economic conditions during 2008, CIB Marine recognized a $0.5 million provision during the first quarter of 2008 related to the purchased home equity loan pools. 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

CIB Marine’s primary risk exposure is from interest rate risk. Net interest income and the estimated market value of CIB Marine’s assets and liabilities are vulnerable to changes in interest rates. Other risks exist to a lesser degree, including foreign currency exchange rate risk and equity price risk. Commodity price risk does not normally arise in the course of CIB Marine’s business.

62

CIB Marine’s Board of Directors has overall responsibility for its interest rate risk management policies. CIB Marine sets policy limits for interest rate risk to be assumed in the normal course of business. CIB Marine’s market risk policy has the general objective of maintaining a low level of earnings volatility due to interest rate risk and to protect CIB Marine from the impact that changes in interest rates have on net interest income. CIB Marine uses gap analysis and earnings simulations to measure interest rate risk.

CIB Marine’s Asset-Liability Management Committee monitors, at least quarterly, the interest rate risk measurements for compliance with policy limits. If the derived interest rate risk measurements are outside of the policy limits, management may implement a variety of strategies to reduce the risk. CIB Marine strives to use the most effective instruments for implementing its interest rate risk management strategies, considering the costs, liquidity impact and capital requirements of the various alternatives. The implementation strategies usually involve targeting specific market risk characteristics for new marketable securities and new funding liabilities, and may also include the use of derivative instruments and the altering of the market risk characteristics of groups of interest rate sensitive assets such as the repositioning of marketable securities.

The gap analysis as of December 31, 2007, is shown in the following table and represents the contractual reprice risk positions of CIB Marine. The gap analysis does not fully represent basis, yield curve or option risk. The table shows interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities and the difference between them within each time interval. In this analysis the contractual repricing interest rate sensitivity position is balanced when an equal amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reprice during a given time interval. Excess interest rate sensitive assets or liabilities repricing in a given time period results in the interest sensitivity gap shown in the table. A positive or asset-sensitive gap indicates that more interest-earning assets than interest-bearing liabilities will reprice in a given time period, while a negative or liability-sensitive gap indicates that more interest-bearing liabilities than interest-earning assets will reprice in a given time period.

Repricing Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

	December 31, 2007
	0-3 Months			4-6 Months			7-12 Months			2-5 Years			Over 5 Years			Held for sale/disposal			Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	273,432		$	55,916		$	81,725		$	174,313		$	10,475		$	(602	)	$	595,259
Loans held for sale		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Securities (1)		54,203			12,196			39,459			176,724			46,037			—			328,619
Federal funds sold		52,192			—			—			—			—			—			52,192
Total interest-earning assets		379,827			68,112			121,184			351,037			56,512			(602	)		976,070
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Time deposits		135,840			132,033			122,593			73,294			141			—			463,901
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits		208,170			—			—			—			—			—			208,170
Short-term borrowings		85,616			—			—			—			—			—			85,616
Long-term borrowings		—			—			—			12,000			—			—			12,000
Junior subordinated debentures		20,619			—			—			41,238			—			—			61,857
Total interest-bearing liabilities		450,245			132,033			122,593			126,532			141			—			831,544
Interest sensitivity gap (by period)	$	(70,418	)	$	(63,921	)	$	(1,409	)	$	224,505		$	56,371		$	(602	)	$	144,526
Interest sensitivity gap (cumulative)		(70,418	)		(134,339	)		(135,748	)		88,757			145,128			144,526			144,526
Adjusted for derivatives
Derivatives (notional, by period)		(4,261	)		—			—			5,000			(739	)		—			—
Derivatives (notional, cumulative)		(4,261	)		(4,261	)		(4,261	)		739			—			—			—
Interest sensitivity gap (by period)		(74,679	)		(63,921	)		(1,409	)		229,505			55,632			(602	)		144,526
Interest sensitivity gap (cumulative)		(74,679	)		(138,600	)		(140,009	)		89,496			145,128			144,526			144,526
Cumulative gap as a % of total assets		(7.42	)%		(13.78	)%		(13.92	)%		8.90	%		14.43	%		14.37	%

(1) Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock are included in securities.

The financial instruments are shown to reprice at the earlier of their principal repayment date due to maturity, amortization, or prepayment in a stable rate environment or their next contractual reprice. In the gap analysis, non-maturing interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are shown to reprice at the next contractual reprice date and the Collateralized Mortgage Obligations and the Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits that are a part of the investment securities are shown to reprice in those periods in which they are expected to repay.

The table indicates that CIB Marine has a negative cumulative gap at one year and a positive cumulative gap at the end of five years and after. The primary reason for a positive cumulative gap at 60 months and over is that neither non-interest-bearing deposits nor capital are interest-bearing and hence are not included in the gap analysis. A positive gap would indicate that an increase in interest rates will generally have a positive effect on the net interest income, and a decrease in interest rates will generally have a negative effect on net interest income. A negative gap would indicate that a decrease in interest rates will generally have a positive effect on the net interest income, and an increase in interest rates will generally have a negative effect on net interest income.

63

While this repricing interest rate sensitivity analysis is a widely used measure of interest rate risk and may be used as an indication of interest margin direction, it does not fully reflect the effects given to interest rate risks other than reprice risk, such as option, basis and yield curve risks. For these reasons, CIB Marine also performs interest rate sensitivity analyses using earnings simulation models. These analyses measure the estimated percentage change in net interest income due to changes in interest rates. CIB Marine derives results for selected hypothetical changes in interest rates over a selected period of time, usually one year.

The following table illustrates the expected percentage change in net interest income over a one year period due to an immediate change in the short-term U.S. prime rate of interest and by the same amount and direction parallel shifts in the related U.S. Treasury and U.S. Dollar LIBOR Swap yield curves as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.

	Basis Point Changes
	+200			+100			-100			-200
Net interest income change over one year
December 31, 2007		(7.35	)%		(4.09	)%		(0.42	)%		(2.96	)%
December 31, 2006		(5.78	)%		(4.31	)%		2.23	%		0.67	%

The analysis reveals that on a relative basis the company is more liability sensitive for the one year horizon at both December 31, 2007 and 2006. This means that in a rising interest rate environment, interest expense would increase by more than interest income over a one year horizon than in a declining interest rate environment. The analysis also reveals that the relationship between basis point changes in interest rates and net interest income changes is not a linear relationship; the primary reason for this is the option and basis risks inherent in the assets and liabilities of CIB Marine. The primary form of option risk prevalent is prepayment risks in the loan and mortgage backed security assets, and the primary form of basis risk inherent is differences in the timing and magnitude of changes to U.S. prime rates of interest and interest rates paid on non-maturing deposit accounts. CIB Marine increased the average life of it assets relative to its liabilities to achieve and maintain the interest rate risk position it has at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

CIB Marine monitors the models on an ongoing basis to ensure the assumptions most accurately reflect the current conditions. The balance sheet financial instruments included in the gap and simulation models include loans, investment securities, federal funds sold, time deposits, saving deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings. Some of the options accounted for in the simulation analysis include call options in U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise issued investment securities, embedded call options in U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise issued Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits, fixed rate loans, loans with rate floors and put options in various borrowings.

In addition, the interest rate sensitivity analyses include derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps and forward sale agreements. At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, the notional value of receive fixed/pay floating interest rate swaps was $10.0 million and the notional value of pay fixed/receive floating interest rate swaps was $5.6 million. The majority of CIB Marine’s interest rate swaps are used to hedge the fair market value of various deposits and loans. These interest rate swaps effectively convert the fixed rates on the financial instruments to floating rates.

Some of the features of the financial instruments included in the model that are not reflected fully in the quantitative market risk disclosure information include call options in municipal bonds and U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise issued structured notes.

The following assumptions were used in the earnings simulation model:

· The balance sheet size was assumed to remain constant;

· All maturing assets and liabilities were invested or deposited into similar financial or derivative instruments;

· Spreads to the benchmark interest rates for pricing new volume to replace maturing or paying older volumes were similar to spreads currently inherent in those financial instruments, except for marketable securities which reflects current market spreads;

· The interest rates of financial instruments with like terms were assumed to change by the same number of basis points except that the timing, magnitude, and direction of change of interest rates paid on non-maturing savings and interest-bearing demand deposits were assumed to change in a way similar to that experienced in the past, which is less than perfectly correlated with the other interest rate changes. Current anticipated pricing strategies for non-maturing deposits were also utilized.

The simulations of earnings do not incorporate any management actions that might change the response of net interest income to interest rate changes. Therefore, they may not reflect actual results.

Equity price risk exists as the result of various holdings of equity securities whose market value changes with changes in the market. Equity holdings include those traded on various exchanges and those that are not, the latter of which have limited liquidity. CIB Marine does not actively hedge its equity positions with derivatives to mitigate the risk of price movements in equity securities. Total equity security holdings of CIB Marine at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, includes $0.1 million and $1.4 million of private and public nonaffiliated firms, $1.2 million and $1.4 million in low income housing tax credit limited partnerships, $0.6 million and $0.6 million of Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago stock and $11.7 million and $11.8 million of FHLB stock.

Foreign currency exchange rate risk arises through the sale of foreign currency forward contracts to customers of CIB Marine. CIB Marine hedges all such activity. At December 31, 2007 and 2006 there were no contracts outstanding. Foreign currency exchange risk also arises through transactions denominated in foreign currencies at Canron. CIB Marine does not hedge this activity.

64

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" on January 1, 2007.

KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

March 31, 2008

65

CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands,
	except share data)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks	$	22,649		$	24,447
Federal funds sold		52,192			90,688
Total cash and cash equivalents		74,841			115,135
Loans held for sale		—			80
Securities		316,321			333,288
Loans		595,259			522,624
Allowance for loan losses		(20,706	)		(20,906	)
Net loans		574,553			501,718
Premises and equipment, net		8,961			10,912
Accrued interest receivable		5,839			5,582
Foreclosed properties		1,344			102
Assets of branches held for sale		—			418
Assets of companies held for disposal		1,851			4,112
Goodwill		—			746
Other assets		22,077			25,491
Total assets	$	1,005,787		$	997,584
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	73,519		$	81,741
Interest-bearing demand		36,832			38,167
Savings		171,338			181,664
Time		463,901			438,212
Total deposits		745,590			739,784
Short-term borrowings		85,616			27,653
Long-term borrowings		12,000			2,000
Junior subordinated debentures		61,857			61,857
Accrued interest payable		33,223			24,940
Deposits of branches held for sale		—			55,365
Liabilities of companies held for disposal		3,976			7,003
Other liabilities		3,219			7,369
Total liabilities		945,481			925,971
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		—			—
Common stock, $1 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 18,346,442 issued and outstanding		18,346			18,346
Capital surplus		158,398			158,266
Accumulated deficit		(117,537	)		(102,806	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net		1,382			(1,880	)
Receivables from sale of stock		(121	)		(151	)
Treasury stock at cost, 12,663 shares		(162	)		(162	)
Total stockholders’ equity		60,306			71,613
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,005,787		$	997,584

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

66

CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans	$	44,627		$	38,533		$	38,416
Loans held for sale		5			2			83
Securities:
Taxable		14,516			17,907			15,367
Tax-exempt		81			161			509
Dividends		239			605			1,178
Federal funds sold		3,226			4,301			4,296
Total interest and dividend income		62,694			61,509			59,849
Interest Expense
Deposits		29,695			29,247			26,997
Short-term borrowings		1,698			1,008			795
Long-term borrowings		118			245			367
Junior subordinated debentures		8,556			7,742			6,636
Total interest expense		40,067			38,242			34,795
Net interest income		22,627			23,267			25,054
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		6,413			(4,384	)		(8,669	)
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		16,214			27,651			33,723
Noninterest Income
Loan fees		421			270			442
Deposit service charges		963			1,041			1,142
Other service fees		119			184			625
Other income		233			320			369
Net gain on sale of assets and deposits		1,314			2,727			—
Gain on sale of investment securities, net		—			—			355
Total noninterest income		3,050			4,542			2,933
Noninterest Expense
Compensation and employee benefits		18,167			20,484			25,696
Equipment		3,155			3,420			4,134
Occupancy and premises		3,134			3,332			3,823
Professional services		3,348			4,484			3,990
Impairment loss on investment securities		—			1,134			2,024
Write down and losses on assets		742			—			1,896
Other expense		5,926			9,277			9,445
Total noninterest expense		34,472			42,131			51,008
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(15,208	)		(9,938	)		(14,352	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		3			(99	)		(1,208	)
Loss from continuing operations		(15,211	)		(9,839	)		(13,144	)
Discontinued operations:
Pretax income from discontinued operations		417			660			3,650
Pretax net gain on sales of discontinued operations		—			—			200
Total pretax income from discontinued operations		417			660			3,850
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,023	)		99			2,367
Income from discontinued operations		1,440			561			1,483
Net Loss	$	(13,771	)	$	(9,278	)	$	(11,661	)
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.72	)
Discontinued operations		0.08			0.03			0.08
Net loss	$	(0.75	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.64	)
Diluted:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.72	)
Discontinued operations		0.08			0.03			0.08
Net loss	$	(0.75	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.64	)
Weighted average shares-basic		18,333,779			18,333,779			18,333,779
Weighted average shares-diluted		18,333,779			18,333,779			18,333,779

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

67

CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

	Common Stock									Accumulated Other			Stock Receivables and
	Shares		Par   Value		Capital Surplus		Accumulated Deficit			Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total
	(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Balance, December 31, 2004		18,346,442	$	18,346	$	158,163	$	(81,867	)	$	(642	)	$	(1,108	)	$	92,892
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—		—		—		(11,661	)		—			—			(11,661	)
Other comprehensive loss:
Impairment loss on investment securities		—		—		—		—			(2,024	)		—			(2,024	)
Unrealized securities holding losses arising during the period		—		—		—		—			(769	)		—			(769	)
Total comprehensive loss																	(14,454	)
Reduction of receivables from sale of stock		—		—		—		—			—			744			744
Balance, December 31, 2005		18,346,442	$	18,346	$	158,163	$	(93,528	)	$	(3,435	)	$	(364	)	$	79,182
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—		—		—		(9,278	)		—			—			(9,278	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Impairment loss on investment securities		—		—		—		—			(1,134	)		—			(1,134	)
Unrealized securities holding gains arising during the period		—		—		—		—			2,689			—			2,689
Total comprehensive loss																	(7,723	)
Stock option expense		—		—		103		—			—			—			103
Reduction of receivables from sale of stock		—		—		—		—			—			51			51
Balance, December 31, 2006		18,346,442	$	18,346	$	158,266	$	(102,806	)	$	(1,880	)	$	(313	)	$	71,613
Cumulative effect of adoption of Fin 48 (1)		—		—		—		(960	)		—			—			(960	)
Adjusted Balance at beginning of period		18,346,442	$	18,346	$	158,266	$	(103,766	)	$	(1,880	)	$	(313	)	$	70,653
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—		—		—		(13,771	)		—			—			(13,771	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized securities holding gains arising during the period		—		—		—		—			3,262			—			3,262
Total comprehensive loss																	(10,509	)
Stock option expense		—		—		132		—			—			—			132
Reduction of receivables from sale of stock		—		—		—		—			—			30			30
Balance, December 31, 2007		18,346,442	$	18,346	$	158,398	$	(117,537	)	$	1,382		$	(283	)	$	60,306

(1) See Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion on the FIN 48 adjustment.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

68

CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(15,211	)	$	(9,839	)	$	(13,144	)
Net income from discontinued operations		1,440			561			1,483
		(13,771	)		(9,278	)		(11,661	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Deferred loan fee amortization		(639	)		(693	)		(982	)
Depreciation and other amortization		1,118			2,761			2,637
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		6,413			(4,384	)		(8,669	)
Originations of loans held for sale		(2,600	)		(1,965	)		—
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		2,716			1,906			—
Net gain on sale of assets and deposits		(1,314	)		(2,727	)		—
Write down and losses on assets		742			—			1,896
Impairment loss on investment securities		—			1,134			2,024
Gain on sale of investment securities, net		—			—			(355	)
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable and other assets		2,735			(2,238	)		4,495
Increase in interest payable junior subordinated debentures		8,501			7,688			6,581
Increase (decrease) in other interest payable and other liabilities		(4,464	)		2,487			(964	)
Operating cash flows of discontinued operations		(291	)		(523	)		2,176
Net cash used in operating activities		(854	)		(5,832	)		(2,822	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Maturities of securities available for sale		107,225			159,757			620,224
Purchase of securities available for sale		(94,476	)		(100,943	)		(432,021	)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		33,204			—			9,639
Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities available for sale		48,037			—			6,400
Repayments of asset and mortgage-backed securities available for sale		52,567			81,072			71,231
Purchase of asset and mortgage-backed securities available for sale		(125,567	)		(5,390	)		(381,492	)
Net decrease (increase) in Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		45			14,431			(11,951	)
Net decrease (increase) in other investments		48			795			(677	)
Net decrease (increase) in loans		(79,761	)		(5,954	)		208,836
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		—			—			24,113
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed properties		10			2,525			1,372
Net cash received from the sale of branches		2,278			3,620			—
Decrease (increase) in premises and equipment, net		183			(602	)		(2,007	)
Investing cash flows of discontinued operations		(1,435	)		1,011			4,955
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(57,642	)		150,322			118,622
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Increase (decrease) in deposits		5,574			(63,713	)		(243,515	)
Decrease in deposits of branches held for sale		(5,700	)		(11,627	)		—
Deposits sold		(49,665	)		(64,329	)		—
Repayments of long-term borrowings		(2,000	)		(5,250	)		—
Proceeds from long-term borrowings		12,000			—			—
Net increase decrease in short-term borrowings		57,963			2,652			6,192
Net decrease in receivables from sale of stock		30			—			500
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		18,202			(142,267	)		(236,823	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(40,294	)		2,223			(121,023	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		115,135			112,912			233,935
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	74,841		$	115,135		$	112,912
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid (received) during the year for:
Interest expense-continuing operations	$	31,784		$	30,198		$	28,543
Interest expense-discontinued operations		—			—			31
Income taxes-continuing operations		—			—			(5,763	)
Income taxes-discontinued operations		—			2			(458	)
Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Activities
Transfers of loans to foreclosed properties-continuing operations	$	1,273		$	52		$	1,400
Transfers of commercial loans to loans held for sale		—			—			25,847
Transfer deposits to deposits of branches held for sale		—			64,331			66,991
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48 (1)		960			—			—

(1) See Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion on the FIN 48 adjustment.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

69

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (“CIB Marine”) is a bank holding company. References to “CIB Marine” include CIB Marine’s subsidiaries unless otherwise specified. The primary sources of revenue are providing loans to small and middle-market business customers and investments in securities. CIB Marine also offers a competitive range of deposit and other financial products to its customers. Its offices and, generally, customers are located in the central Illinois, Milwaukee, Indianapolis, Phoenix and southeast Florida markets. Canron Corporation (“Canron”), an 84% owned subsidiary of CIB Construction, was a steel fabrication and erection company, which was acquired in 2002 as a result of collection activities. Since the third quarter of 2003, Canron has been in the process of voluntary liquidation.

The accounting and reporting policies of CIB Marine conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CIB Marine and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, including companies which are held for disposal. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, Canron’s net assets as presented in the consolidated balance sheets of CIB Marine were zero. Accordingly, minority interest in Canron is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are based on various factors, including the current interest rate environment and the general strength of the local economy. Changes in these factors can significantly affect CIB Marine’s net interest income and the value of its recorded assets and liabilities.

Cash Flows

For purposes of presentation in the statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents are defined as those amounts included in the consolidated balance sheet captions “Cash and Due from Banks” and “Federal Funds Sold”, all of which mature within ninety days.

Other Investments

Investments in limited partnerships and other equity investments which are not readily marketable are accounted for using the equity method when CIB Marine’s ownership is at least 3% in a limited partnership and 20% in a corporation, but not more than 50%. Investments not accounted for under the equity method are accounted for using the cost method. All other investments are periodically evaluated for impairments. If an investment is impaired, a loss is recognized. To determine whether an investment is impaired CIB Marine looks to various indicators including recent transactions, if any, and the investee’s financial condition. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, CIB Marine recognized $0.7 million, none and $0.1 million, respectively, of impairment losses on other investments. If different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, the carrying value of these investments may need to be further reduced and a loss recorded or previously recognized losses reversed and a gain recorded. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, other investments totaled $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, all of which are illiquid.

The equity method of accounting requires CIB Marine to record its proportionate share of income or loss as an increase or decrease in its investment and a corresponding gain or loss in noninterest income. Cash dividends or other distributions received by CIB Marine are recorded as reductions in the carrying amount of the investment.

70

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value, determined on an individual basis. When a loan is sold or transferred to held for sale, the loan’s carrying value is compared to its fair value and any shortfall in value that is determined to be credit related is recorded as a charge-off, reducing the allowance for loan losses. Any shortfall in fair value other than credit related is recorded as a charge to noninterest expense. All subsequent net declines in market value of loans held for sale are also recorded to noninterest expense.

Securities Available for Sale

Available for sale securities consist of equity securities, bonds, notes and other debt securities not classified as held to maturity securities or trading securities. Available for sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized net gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on the sale of available for sale securities and declines in value which are judged to be other-than-temporary are recorded in noninterest income or expense as appropriate. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

The amortized cost of securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts over the estimated remaining life of the security. Such amortization is calculated using the level-yield method, adjusted for prepayments, and is included in interest income from investments.

Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and Provision for Credit Losses

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold to maturity for the foreseeable future are carried at the amount of unpaid principal, increased by costs to originate loans and premiums paid on purchased loans and reduced by net deferred fees and an allowance for loan losses. The accrual of interest on loans is generally discontinued when a loan becomes ninety days or more delinquent in accordance with the loan’s contractual terms unless the credit is well secured and in process of collection. Loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered by management to be doubtful. Unpaid interest that has previously been recorded as income is written off against interest income when a loan is placed on nonaccrual. Interest on loans is calculated by using the simple interest method on daily balances of the principal amount outstanding. Interest payments received on loans which are on nonaccrual are generally applied to reduce the loan principal. Loans are returned to accrual status once a borrower has demonstrated repayment performance on the contractual schedule for a period of six consecutive months and the expectation is that contractual payments will continue to be made during the remaining term of the loan.

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance when management believes that the collectibility of the principal amount is unlikely and where loans are sold at less than their outstanding principal balances. Recoveries of amounts previously charged-off are credited to the allowance.

The provision for loan losses is included in the provision for credit losses in the statements of operations. Also included in the provision for credit losses is the expense for probable losses on unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. Estimated losses on unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit are accrued and included in other liabilities.

Management periodically reviews the loan portfolio in order to establish an allowance for loan losses that are probable at the reporting date. The allowance for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of individual loans and the entire loan portfolio, including such factors as the volume and character of loans outstanding, the relationship of the allowance for loan losses to outstanding loans, past loan loss experience, the expected loan repayments, estimated value of any underlying collateral on individual loans and general economic conditions.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses contained in these financial statements was adequate at December 31, 2007 and 2006. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in the loan portfolio and/or in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review CIB Marine’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require CIB Marine to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

71

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CIB Marine will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment records and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Cash collections on impaired loans which are individually evaluated are credited to the loan receivable balance and no interest income is recognized on those loans until the loan is no longer considered impaired.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, CIB Marine does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment.

Loan origination fees are deferred and certain direct origination costs are capitalized. The amounts deferred and capitalized as well as premiums on purchased loans are included in the carrying amount of the loans and amortized over the estimated life of the loans as an adjustment of the yield of the related loan. Amortization of deferred loan fees and costs ceases when a loan is placed on nonaccrual. Fees for loans sold and other loan fees are included in the net gain or loss recognized on the sale.

Goodwill

Goodwill resulted from the acquisition of companies or assets. Fair values have been determined by examining stock prices of publicly traded financial institutions with similar performance characteristics as the reporting units and discounted cash flow models. Where market prices are not available and the reporting unit is held for disposal, third party valuations or anticipated offer values are used. Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. Prior to 2002, goodwill was amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. As a result of a branch sale in the first quarter of 2007, CIB Marine has no goodwill at December 31, 2007.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation computed primarily using the straight-line method. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while renewals and betterments are capitalized. Estimated useful lives of assets are 39 years for buildings and 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment. Leasehold improvements included in premises and equipment are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the term of the lease. Rent expense on noncancellable leases is accrued on the straight-line basis over the term of the lease based upon minimum rents.

Foreclosed Properties

Foreclosed properties include other real estate (“ORE”) assets that have been received in satisfaction of debt. ORE is initially recorded and subsequently carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Any valuation adjustments required at the date of transfer to ORE are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequently, operating results from ORE, reductions in value of the foreclosed property and realized gains and losses on sale are recorded in noninterest income or noninterest expense as appropriate.

72

Assets of Companies Held For Disposal

Assets held for disposal include the remaining assets of Mortgage Services, Inc. (“MSI”), MICR and Canron. MICR and Canron were acquired in full or partial satisfaction of loans. These assets are carried at the lower of cost or current fair value, less estimated selling costs. Thereafter, the aggregate assets and liabilities are shown as separate categories on the consolidated balance sheets. When these assets are acquired in full or partial satisfaction of a loan, any excess of the related loan balance over the fair value, less estimated selling cost, is charged as a loan loss against the allowance for loan losses. Net operating income or loss of the companies held for disposal and which meet the criteria as discontinued operations are included in gain or loss from discontinued operations. Once a decision is made to cease operations and liquidate the company, CIB Marine discontinues recording any future operating results of the company and records an impairment value, if any, based on the estimated liquidation value of the company’s net assets less costs to sell. The impairment loss is recorded as loss from discontinued operations.

Litigation Contingency

Pursuant to FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” CIB Marine accrues for loss contingencies associated with outstanding litigation for which management has determined that a loss contingency exists and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. Noninterest expense for 2006 included a $1.8 million loss contingency. There were no provisions for loss contingencies in 2007. Legal fees incurred in the defense of the litigation are recognized as incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

Fair value has been estimated using the Black-Scholes model as defined in SFAS No. 123 (“SFAS 123”). The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value for options granted in 2007, 2006 and 2005:

	December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
Dividend yield		—			—			—
Risk free interest rate		3.92	%		4.63	%		4.25	%
Expected volatility		39	%		40	%		48	%
Weighted average expected life		6.5 years			6.5 years			6.5 years
Weighted average per share fair value of options	$	0.43		$	0.76		$	1.47

SFAS 123(R)’s Share-Based Payments (“SFAS 123(R)”) fair value method resulted in $0.1 million of compensation expense for both 2007 and 2006. In accordance with SFAS 123(R), CIB Marine is required to estimate potential forfeitures of stock grants and adjust compensation expense recorded accordingly. The estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized in the period of change and will also impact the amount of stock compensation expense to be recorded in future periods. At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had $0.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.8 years.

SFAS 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow rather than an operating cash flow as required under previous literature. There were no such tax benefits in 2007 or 2006.

For 2005, had compensation expense for these plans been determined based on the fair value method at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the methodology in SFAS 123, CIB Marine’s net loss and loss per share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below:

		December 31, 2005
		(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Net loss	As reported	$	(11,661	)
	Assumed compensation cost Pro forma		(35	)
		$	(11,696	)
Basic loss per share	As reported	$	(0.64	)
	Pro forma		(0.64	)
Diluted loss per share	As reported	$	(0.64	)
	Pro forma		(0.64	)

CIB Marine records amounts received upon the exercise of options by crediting common stock and capital surplus. Income tax benefits from the exercise of stock options result in a decrease in current income taxes payable and, to the extent not previously recognized as a reduction in income tax expense, an additional increase in capital surplus.

73

Advertising Expense

Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred. Advertising expenses of continuing operations, included in noninterest expense, totaled $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Receivables from Sale of Stock

Loans originated by CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks to purchase CIB Marine stock are accounted for as a reduction in stockholders’ equity and are reported in a contra-equity account titled “Receivables From Sale of Stock,” unless the loan has been repaid prior to the issuance of the financial statements or the loan has been adequately collateralized, exclusive of the value of CIB Marine stock pledged as collateral, if any.

Servicing of Financial Assets

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASBStatement No. 140 (“SFAS 156”). SFAS 156 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations. SFAS 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. The statement permits subsequent measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities using either a fair value method or an amortization method. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Adoption of this standard did not materially affect CIB Marine’s consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the amounts reported for assets and liabilities for financial statement purposes and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are recognized for temporary differences that are expected to be deductible in future years’ tax returns and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance through a charge to income tax expense when, in the opinion of management, it is deemed more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences that will be taxable in future years’ tax returns.

CIB Marine and its subsidiaries file unitary, combined and separate state tax returns where required. Canron files its own Canadian and provincial income tax returns. Canron’s Canadian, U.S. federal, state and provincial income taxes are included in discontinued operations. CIB Marine has entered into tax allocation agreements with its subsidiary entities included in the consolidated U.S. federal and unitary or combined state income tax returns, including U.S. operations of companies held for sale or disposal. These agreements govern the timing and amount of income tax payments required by the various entities.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through income tax expense (benefit).

In June 2006, the FASB released FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. CIB Marine adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 and has completed the process of evaluating the effect of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements as of January 1, 2007, and as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. The FIN 48 adjustment is related to CIB Marine’s investment in an Illinois real estate investment trust (“REIT”), owned by its former Illinois banking subsidiary, which was sold in 2004. As of December 31, 2006, CIB Marine maintained a $1.9 million liability related to its exposure. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 was a $1.0 million increase in liabilities of companies held for disposal and a $1.0 million decrease to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. During 2007the statute of limitations expired with respect to a portion of this exposure. As a result of this event, CIB Marine reversed $1.3 million of the tax liability through a credit to discontinued operations tax expense while also recording a $0.3 million charge to its discontinued operations tax expense for interest and penalties related to the remaining REIT tax exposure. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, CIB Marine had a $1.7 million and $1.9 million current tax liability related to the tax exposure of its former subsidiary. This amount is included in liabilities of companies held for disposal on the consolidated balance sheets. At both December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, CIB Marine also had a $0.5 million current tax liability related to individually insignificant federal and state tax items. Of this amount $0.2 million is included in liabilities of companies held for disposal and $0.3 million is netted against the income tax receivable included in other assets.

74

CIB Marine files income tax returns in the U. S. federal and various state jurisdictions. CIB Marine is no longer subject to income tax examinations by U. S. federal or state tax authorities for years before 1999. As of January 1, 2007 the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $4.7 million. At December 31, 2007, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $2.4 million. CIB Marine recognizes any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. As of the date of adoption of FIN 48, approximately $1.0 million was accrued for the potential payment of interest and penalties. CIB Marine does not anticipate significant adjustments to the amount of total unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

The following table reconciles total gross amounts of unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning and end of 2007:

	2007
Balance at January 1, 2007	$	4,705
Additions for positions taken during the current year		212
Additions for positions taken in prior years		280
Reductions resulting from expiration of statutes		(1,300	)
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	3,897

Business Segments

An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities that generate revenue and incur expense. A segment is further defined as a component whose operating results are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in the determination of resource allocation and performance, and for which discrete financial information is available.

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine determined it had one reportable continuing business segment. CIB Marine, through the bank branch network of its subsidiaries, provides a broad range of financial services to companies and individuals in Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, Florida and Arizona. These services include commercial and retail lending and accepting deposits. While CIB Marine’s chief operating decision maker monitors the revenue streams of the various products and services, operations in all areas are managed, and financial performance is evaluated, on a corporate-wide basis.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, if any, is computed using the treasury stock method. Stock options deemed antidilutive are not included in the earnings per share calculation.

Foreign Currency Translation

Canron had operations in the United States, Canada and Mexico at the time of acquisition. As of December 31, 2007, operations in the United States, Canada and Mexico had been sold. The remaining assets and liabilities in the United States and Canada are in the process of liquidation. See Note 7-Companies Held for Disposal and Discontinued Operations for further information.

Canron uses the local currency, primarily Canadian Dollars, as their functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Net exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of financial statements of foreign operations are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity. The effect of foreign currency remeasurement and changes in exchange rates are recorded in the cost of contract revenue as it is expensed against the contract as incurred.

75

Derivative and Hedging Activities

CIB Marine uses certain derivative financial instruments to help manage its risk or exposure to changes in interest rates and in conjunction with its mortgage banking operations. Effective January 1, 2001, CIB Marine adopted SFAS 133, as amended by SFAS 138 and SFAS 149, which established new rules for the recognition and measurement of derivatives and hedging activities.

Under SFAS 133, all derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. On the date a derivative contract is entered into, CIB Marine designates the derivative as either (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (“Fair-Value Hedge”), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“Cash-Flow Hedge”), (3) a foreign currency, fair value or cash-flow hedge (“Foreign-Currency Hedge”), (4) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, or (5) held for trading (“Trading Instruments”). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective as, and that is designated and qualifies as, a Fair-Value Hedge, along with the loss or gain on the corresponding hedged asset or liability (including losses or gains on firm commitments), are recorded in current period earnings. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective as, and that is designated and qualifies as, a Cash-Flow Hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). Changes in the fair value of derivative trading instruments are reported in current period earnings.

At the time the hedging instrument is entered into, CIB Marine formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as Fair-Value Hedges, Cash-Flow Hedges, or Foreign-Currency Hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. CIB Marine formally assesses, for all hedges, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions will be or have been highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items and whether they are expected to continue to be highly effective in the future. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, CIB Marine discontinues hedge accounting prospectively.

CIB Marine discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when (1) it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item (including firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) the derivative is designated as a hedge instrument because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur; (4) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (5) management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective Fair-Value Hedge, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, and the hedged asset or liability will no longer be adjusted for changes in fair value. When hedge accounting is discontinued because the hedged item no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, and any asset or liability that was recorded pursuant to recognition of the firm commitment will be removed from the balance sheet and recognized as a gain or loss in current period earnings. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, and gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income will be recognized immediately in earnings. In all other situations in which it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or when hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative will be carried at its fair value on the balance sheet, with changes in its fair value recognized in current period earnings and the adjustment to the hedged asset or liability will be amortized to earnings over the remaining life of the hedged asset or liability.

76

CIB Marine uses interest rate swaps to hedge changes in the fair value of certain fixed rate deposits and certain loans attributable to changes in market interest rates. CIB Marine primarily uses interest rate swaps that effectively convert the fixed rate financial instrument into a floating rate financial instrument. CIB Marine enters into these transactions to provide a floating rate asset or liability whose rate is highly correlated with the index rate off which the floating rate is paid in the interest rate swap. CIB Marine generally enters into swap agreements with nationally recognized securities firms and monitors the credit status of counterparties and the level of collateral for such swaps.

CIB Marine’s mortgage banking activities include the issuance of rate lock commitments for residential mortgage loans. When the loan is originated or purchased it is recorded as a residential mortgage loan held for sale. The interest rate lock commitments and the residential mortgage loans held for sale are hedged with either conditional forward contracts or best efforts contracts and forward settling to-be-announced mortgage securities contracts. A hedging relationship is established between the interest rate lock commitments and the residential mortgage loans held for sale and a Fair-Value Hedge is designated under SFAS 133. CIB Marine is in a short position with respect to the forward contracts, whereby CIB Marine agrees to sell residential mortgage loans held for sale at a pre-established price at some future date, and in a long position with the residential mortgage loans held for sale. The hedging relationship is highly effective as it minimizes the effect of changes in the fair value of the residential mortgage loans held for sale due to interest rate changes. The notional amount of forward contracts outstanding varies and is a function of the current balance of residential mortgage loans held for sale and commitments to extend mortgage loans to be held for sale. CIB Marine generally enters into various mortgage forward contracts with nationally recognized banks and securities firms and monitors the credit status of counterparties and the level of collateral for such swaps.

In addition, CIB Marine has various agreements arising out of certain credit relationships under which it may earn other forms of contingent loan fees in addition to interest. The contingent loan fee is typically based upon, or determined by, the financial performance of the borrower or as payment for credit services.

Note 2-Cash and Due from Banks

Reserves in the form of deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank and vault cash totaling $5.3 million and $8.8 million were maintained to satisfy federal regulatory requirements as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These amounts are included in cash and due from banks in the consolidated balance sheets.

Note 3-Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and approximate fair values of securities at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2007
U.S. government agencies	$	63,104	$	1,202	$	7	$	64,299
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		31,031		127		223		30,935
Other notes and bonds		9,098		—		200		8,898
Asset-backed securities		—		—		—		—
Commercial paper		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-backed securities		211,706		1,199		716		212,189
Total securities available for sale	$	314,939	$	2,528	$	1,146	$	316,321
December 31, 2006
U.S. government agencies	$	101,321	$	193	$	554	$	100,960
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		32,067		146		526		31,687
Other notes and bonds		350		—		—		350
Asset-backed securities		2,192		5		—		2,197
Commercial paper		4,384		—		—		4,384
Mortgage-backed securities		194,854		520		1,664		193,710
Total securities available for sale	$	335,168	$	864	$	2,744	$	333,288

77

Securities available for sale with a carrying value of $212.4 million and $140.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, repurchase agreements and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2007, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Certain securities, other than mortgage-backed securities, may be called earlier than their maturity date. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities in mortgage-backed securities, because certain mortgages may be prepaid without penalties. Therefore, mortgage-backed securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following contractual maturity schedule.

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	19,126	$	19,162
Due after one year through five years		46,190		47,364
Due after five years through ten years		14,598		14,553
Due after ten years		23,319		23,053
		103,233		104,132
Mortgage-backed securities		211,706		212,189
Total securities available for sale	$	314,939	$	316,321

The following tables represent gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of securities aggregated by investment category and length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006:

	Less than 12 months in an  unrealized loss position				12 months or longer in an unrealized loss position				Total
	Fair  Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair  Value		Unrealized Losses
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2007
U.S. government agencies	$	—	$	—	$	7,500	$	7	$	7,500	$	7
Obligations of states and  political subdivisions		16,520		149		2,394		74		18,914		223
Other notes and bonds		5,800		200		—		—		5,800		200
Mortgage-backed securities		41,518		212		58,603		504		100,121		716
Total securities with unrealized  losses	$	63,838	$	561	$	68,497	$	585	$	132,335	$	1,146
Securities without unrealized  losses										183,986
Total securities									$	316,321
December 31, 2006
U.S. government agencies	$	7,473	$	17	$	49,506	$	537	$	56,979	$	554
Obligations of states and  political subdivisions		8,488		100		13,450		426		21,938		526
Mortgage-backed securities		2,838		16		140,005		1,648		142,843		1,664
Total securities with unrealized  losses	$	18,799	$	133	$	202,961	$	2,611	$	221,760	$	2,744
Securities without unrealized  losses										111,528
Total securities									$	333,288

As of December 31, 2007, management has concluded that the unrealized losses above are temporary in nature since they are primarily related to market interest rates and are not related to the underlying credit quality of the issuers of securities in the investment portfolio. Additionally, CIB Marine has the intent and ability to hold these investments for the time necessary to recover the amortized cost. As of December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had 124 securities in an unrealized loss position.

78

Proceeds from the sales of securities available for sale during 2007 were $81.2 million. During 2007, CIB Marine did not realize any additional gains or losses on these sales, but did record impairment losses during 2006 and 2005 related to these sales. There were no impairment losses realized during 2007. In the first quarter of 2007, CIB Marine decided to sell certain securities in its available for sale portfolio. The sale of these securities in 2007 supported CIB Marine’s asset-liability strategy of selling lower yielding assets and purchasing higher yielding assets. A portion of the proceeds were also used to pay down certain short-term liabilities incurred as a result of the sale of branches and the purchase of a pool of home equity loans in 2007. When the decision was made in the first quarter of 2007 to sell these securities, CIB Marine had not yet filed its 2005 or 2006 Form 10-K’s. As a result of the decision CIB Marine determined the full value of those certain securities would not be fully recovered and, accordingly, recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $1.1 million and $2.0 million on these securities during 2006 and 2005, respectively. This impairment loss is included in impairment loss on investment securities on the consolidated statements of operations for 2006 and 2005 and is reflected in the carrying value of these loss securities on the consolidated balance sheet for 2006.

There were no sales of securities during 2006. Proceeds from the sale of securities during 2005 were $21.0 million, and net realized gain on the sale of these securities was $0.4 million.

Since December 31, 2007, due to economic conditions, several nationally recognized rating agencies downgraded the credit ratings of several of the investment grade credit insuring companies. Several of the downgraded companies insure municipal obligation investments owned by CIB Marine. The municipal obligations have a par value of $16.5 million and a fair value of $16.4 million as of December 31, 2007. CIB Marine has not recognized any impairment on these effected municipal obligations and the securities are still considered investment grade quality as rated by the rating agencies.

Note 4 - Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

Loans

The components of loans were as follows:

	December 31,
	2007						2006
	Amount			% of Total			Amount			% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial	$	63,046			10.6	%	$	49,777			9.5	%
Commercial real estate		258,265			43.5			282,233			54.0
Commercial real estate construction		139,663			23.5			111,040			21.3
Residential real estate		20,938			3.5			19,125			3.7
Home equity loans		108,486			18.3			57,990			11.1
Consumer loans		3,241			0.6			2,363			0.4
Receivables from sale of CIB Marine stock		(121	)		(0.0	)		(151	)		(0.0	)
Gross loans		593,518			100.0	%		522,377			100.0	%
Deferred loan fees		1,741						247
Loans		595,259						522,624
Allowance for loan losses		(20,706	)					(20,906	)
Loans, net	$	574,553					$	501,718

During 2005 CIB Marine transferred to loans held for sale, and subsequently sold, a limited amount of portfolio loans as part of its loan work-out and restructuring strategy. The loans sold in 2005 were commercial real estate and commercial construction loans At the time of sale, the carrying values of the loans sold were $24.6 million, and a loss of $1.7 million was recognized on the sale of these loans. This loss is included in write down and losses on assets in the statement of operations. There were no portfolio loans transferred to loans held for sale during 2007 or 2006.

79

The following table lists information on nonperforming and certain past due loans:

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans	$	18,866	$	20,669
Restructured loans		—		—
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing		66		1,485

Information on impaired loans is as follows:

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans without a specific allowance	$	5,101	$	5,543
Impaired loans with a specific allowance		11,053		14,380
Total impaired loans	$	16,154	$	19,923
Specific allowance related to impaired loans	$	4,051	$	7,451
Average balance of impaired loans		15,934		22,310
Cash basis interest on impaired loans	$	457	$	379

During 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, CIB Marine recognized net losses on the sale and impairment of foreclosed property of $0.02 million, $0.2 thousand and $0.1 million. The 2007, 2006 and $0.04 million of the 2005 net loss is included in write down and losses on assets and the remaining $0.06 million of the 2005 loss is included in loss from discontinued operations.

During 2007, CIB Marine purchased a $48.2 million closed end pool of fixed rate second lien home equity loans from Residential Funding Corporation, a division of General Motors Acceptance Corporation: The purchased pool included 965 loans with a weighted average yield of 10.0%, term to maturity of 17.5 years, loan-to-value ratio of 94%, borrower debt service-to-income ratios of 40%, and FICO score of 709. During the second quarter of 2006, CIB Marine purchased a $47.8 million pool of fixed rate second lien home equity loans from Residential Funding Corporation, a division of General Motors Acceptance Corporation. The purchased pool consisted of 989 loans with a weighted average yield of 9.5%, term to maturity of 17.3 years, loan-to-value ratio of 91%, borrower debt service-to-income ratios of 39% and FICO score of 713. At December 31, 2007, the remaining balance of these two purchased pools was $73.0 million with an allocated allowance of $5.3 million.

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans serviced for others were $2.0 million and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine had $1.0 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in outstanding principal balances on loans secured, or partially secured, by CIB Marine stock. Specific reserves on these loans were $0.3 million and $0.01 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Loans made specifically to enable the borrower to purchase CIB Marine stock and which were not adequately secured by collateral other than the stock have been classified as receivables from sale of stock, recorded as contra-equity and are not included in this balance.

Credit Concentrations

At December 31, 2007 CIB Marine had one secured borrowing relationship (loans to one borrower or a related group of borrowers) that exceeded 25% of stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2007, the total outstanding commitments on that borrowing relationship, including lines of credit not fully drawn, was 36.9% of equity and 3.7% of total loans, and the principal drawn and outstanding on loans in this one borrowing relationship was $6.9 million. As of December 31, 2007 all loans within this borrowing relationship were current. At December 31, 2006, CIB Marine also had one borrowing relationship that exceeded 25% of stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2006, the total outstanding commitments on that borrowing relationship to a commercial general contractor, including lines of credit not fully drawn, were 25.8% of equity and 3.5% of total loans, and the principal drawn and outstanding was $3.1 million.

80

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine also had credit relationships within five industries or industry groups with loans outstanding in excess of 25% of stockholders’ equity:

INDUSTRY	Outstanding Balance		% of Loans			Stockholders’ Equity
	(Dollars in millions)
Commercial Real Estate Developers	$	174.6		29	%		290	%
Residential Real Estate Developers		139.4		23			231
Health Care Facilities		29.7		5			49
Motel and Hotel		20.8		4			35
Nursing/Convalescent Homes		18.5		3			31

Allowance for Loan Losses

Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	20,906		$	24,882		$	29,551
Charge-offs		(8,192	)		(622	)		(3,911	)
Recoveries		1,579			1,030			7,911
Net loan (charge-offs) recoveries		(6,613	)		408			4,000
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses		6,413			(4,384	)		(8,669	)
Balance at end of year	$	20,706		$	20,906		$	24,882
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans		3,48	%		4.00	%		4.83	%

Director and Officer Loans

Certain directors and principal officers of CIB Marine and its subsidiaries, as well as companies with which those individuals are affiliated, are customers of, and conduct banking transactions with, CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks in the ordinary course of business. This indebtedness has been incurred on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons. The activity in these loans during 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

	December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	7,025		$	9,476
New loans		2,085			4,136
Repayments		(2,415	)		(6,587	)
Balance at end of year	$	6,695		$	7,025

Note 5 - Premises and Equipment, net

The major classes of premises and equipment and accumulated depreciation are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Land	$	1,424		$	1,845
Buildings		6,225			7,126
Leasehold improvements		1,638			1,672
Furniture and equipment		19,461			21,023
		28,748			31,666
Less: accumulated depreciation		(19,787	)		(20,336	)
	$	8,961		$	11,330
Assets of branches held for sale		—			(418	)
	$	8,961		$	10,912

Depreciation expense for 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $1.8 million, $2.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively Total rental expense for 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $1.6 million, $1.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

81

CIB Marine leases certain premises and equipment under noncancellable operating leases, which expire at various dates through 2013. Such noncancellable operating leases also include options to renew. The following is a schedule by years of annual future minimum rental commitments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancellable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2007.

	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
2008	$	1,192
2009		862
2010		573
2011		359
2012		295
Thereafter		47
	$	3,328

Note 6 - Goodwill

During 2007 and 2006, respectively CIB Marine sold the fixed assets and deposits of its branches located in Cedarburg and Grafton, Wisconsin. Goodwill of $0.7 million, the entire amount of CIB Marine’s goodwill at December 31, 2006, was allocated to the Cedarburg branch at the time of sale and $0.2 million was allocated to the Grafton branch when it was sold in 2006. CIB Marine has no goodwill at December 31, 2007. The goodwill was not subject to amortization, but was subject to an annual impairment assessment and interim testing if facts and circumstances suggest it may be impaired. There were no goodwill impairment losses recognized during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

	Goodwill
Balance, December 31, 2005	$	982
Reduction of goodwill due to sale of Grafton branch		(236	)
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	746
Reduction of goodwill due to sale of Cedarburg branch		(746	)
Balance, December 31, 2007	$	—

Note 7 - Companies Held For Disposal and Discontinued Operations

Assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal as shown on the consolidated balance sheets are comprised of the following:

	December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets of companies held for disposal
CIB Construction (1)	$	1,183		$	3,250
MICR (1)		—			127
MSI		741			800
Other (2)		(73	)		(65	)
Total assets of companies held for disposal	$	1,851		$	4,112
Liabilities of companies held for disposal
CIB Construction (1)	$	2,365		$	4,559
MICR (1)		33			297
MSI		656			656
Other (2)		922			1,491
Total liabilities of companies held for disposal	$	3,976		$	7,003

(1) Banking regulations limit the holding period to five years, unless extended, for assets not considered to be permissible banking activities and which have been acquired in satisfaction of debt previously contracted. Both MICR and CIB Construction are subject to this restriction. MICR was dissolved in January 2008, and CIB Marine received an extension from the banking regulators to hold Canron until June 30, 2008.

(2) Includes tax liability of subsidiary sold in 2004 and elimination of intercompany transactions between companies held for disposal and affiliates. See Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information on the tax exposure liability.

82

Loss or income from discontinued operations, as shown on the consolidated statements of operations is comprised of the following:

	Pretax income (loss)before gain (loss) on sale of assets and other income			Gain on sale of discontinued operations		Income tax expense (benefit)			Other Income (1)		Netincome (loss) Net of intercompany transactions
	(Dollars in thousands)
2007
CIB Construction	$	131		$	—	$	3		$	—	$	128
MSI		253			—		131			33		155
Other (2)		—			—		(1,157	)		—		1,157
Total	$	384		$	—	$	(1,023	)	$	33	$	1,440
2006
CIB Construction	$	418		$	—	$	156		$	—	$	262
MSI		209			—		(52	)		33		294
Other (2)		—			—		(5	)		—		5
Total	$	627		$	—	$	99		$	33	$	561
2005
CIB Construction	$	2,716		$	—	$	840		$	—	$	1,876
MICR		1,037			200		(233	)		—		1,470
MSI		(304	)		—		(140	)		201		37
Other (2)		—			—		1,900			—		(1,900	)
Total	$	3,449		$	200	$	2,367		$	201	$	1,483

(1) Includes elimination of intercompany transactions and estimated interest and penalties on the tax exposure of a subsidiary sold in 2004. See Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

(2) Relates to tax exposure on subsidiary sold in 2004. See Note 1-Summar of Significant Accounting Policies for further information on the tax exposure. Additionally, 2007 and 2006 also include MICR.

CIB Construction (includes Canron)

CIB Construction, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIB Marine, acquired 84% of the outstanding stock of Canron through loan collection activities in 2002. At the time Canron was acquired it was CIB Marine’s intention to operate the business with long-range plans to sell the business within the five year holding period permitted by regulators. During the third quarter of 2003, the Board of Directors of Canron authorized management to cease operating Canron and commence a wind down of its affairs, including a voluntary liquidation of its assets. In August 2005, Canron authorized and began liquidation distributions to its shareholders. Canron filed Articles of Dissolution in December 2006. The gross consolidated assets and liabilities of CIB Construction are reported separately on the consolidated balance sheets at their estimated liquidation values less costs to sell. At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Construction’s net carrying value of its investment in Canron was zero. During 2007, Canron continued to collect both on and off-balance sheet receivables and settle and resolve payables and claims through the voluntary liquidation process.

The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Construction’s balance sheets which reflects expected liquidation values net of selling costs.

	December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash on deposit at CIB Marine	$	23		$	50
Accounts receivable		551			551
Other assets		609			2,649
Total assets	$	1,183		$	3,250
Liabilities and stockholder’s equity:
Income tax payable	$	1,409		$	3,082
Other liabilities		956			1,477
Total liabilities		2,365			4,559
Stockholder’s equity		(1,182	)		(1,309	)
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	1,183		$	3,250

83

MICR

During the fourth quarter of 2005, CIB Marine sold to unrelated parties substantially all of the assets and operations of MICR and changed the company’s name to Everett Tech, Inc. At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, the remaining net liabilities of MICR consisted of income taxes payable. MICR filed Articles of Dissolution in January 2008.

MSI

During the third quarter of 2004, CIB Marine sold to unrelated parties substantially all of the assets and operations of MSI, a mortgage origination and mortgage brokerage services company. CIB Marine is in the process of winding down the remaining affairs of this company and has incurred certain liabilities with respect to the operations of the mortgage company. These liabilities include repurchase obligations relative to certain mortgage loans as a result of external fraud and/or documentation issues, and certain reporting penalties.

The following table summarizes the composition of MSI’s balance sheets which reflect expected liquidation values net of selling costs.

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash on deposit at CIB Marine	$	45	$	14
Net Loans		602		100
Income tax receivable		86		685
Other assets		8		1
Total assets	$	741	$	800
Liabilities and stockholder’s equity:
Loans payable to CIB Marine	$	612	$	103
Other liabilities		44		553
Total liabilities		656		656
Stockholder’s equity		85		144
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	741	$	800

Note 8 - Assets and Deposits of Branches Held For Sale

At December 31, 2006, CIB Marine’s subsidiary bank Marine Bank had for sale the deposits and property and equipment of its Cedarburg and Brookfield, Wisconsin branches. The deposits and property and equipment of these two branches comprised the balance of assets and deposits of branches held for sale as of December 31, 2006. During the first half of 2007, Marine Bank sold the deposits and property and equipment of these two branches and recognized a net pretax gain on the sale of these two branches of $1.1 million. The gain is included in net gain on sale of assets and deposits. At the date of sales, the deposits and net property and equipment of these sold branches was $49.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Additionally, goodwill of $0.7 million was allocated to the Cedarburg branch. At December 31, 2007, there were no branches held for sale.

During 2006, certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks sold the deposits and certain assets of six of their branches and recognized a total net pretax gain of $2.7 million. The gain on the sales of the branches is included in net gain on sale of assets and deposits. Four of the sold branches were located in Illinois, one in Wisconsin and one in Nebraska. Goodwill of $0.2 million was allocated to the Wisconsin branch. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2006, CIB Marine sold a former branch building located in Bloomington, Illinois at no gain or loss.

During the first quarter of 2005, CIB Marine recognized a $0.2 million impairment loss on the Bloomington building based on its market value, and in the fourth quarter of 2005, CIB Marine sold the deposits, property and equipment of its branch located in Sebring Florida and recognized a pretax gain of $0.3 million. The net gain on the sale of the Sebring branch deposits, property and equipment and the impairment loss on the Bloomington building are included in other noninterest expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

84

Note 9 - Other Assets

The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Marine’s other assets:

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock	$	12,298	$	12,314
Prepaid expenses	$	1,020	$	1,067
Accounts receivable		179		1,508
Trust preferred securities underwriting fee, net of amortization		1,280		1,335
Investment in trust common securities		3,022		2,838
Other investments		1,381		2,821
Income tax receivable		2,737		3,492
Fair value of derivatives		39		—
Other		121		116
	$	22,077	$	25,491

The major components of other investments are as follows:

· Investments in limited partnership interests in various affordable housing partnerships, which had a carrying value of $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, at December 31, 2007 and 2006. Equity loss on these limited partnerships, included in noninterest expense, was $0.2 million in 2007, $0.4 million in 2006 and $0.3 million in 2005. CIB Marine has engaged in these transactions to provide additional qualified investments under the Community Reinvestment Act and to receive related income tax credits. The partnerships provide affordable housing to low-income residents within CIB Marine’s markets and other locations.

· Investment in the common and preferred capital of a limited liability corporation engaged in the development of owner-occupied housing in qualified low-income communities. The carrying value of this investment was zero and $0.7 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During 2007, CIB Marine deemed the entire investment was impaired, and an impairment loss of $0.7 million was recognized in 2007. The impairment loss is included in write down and losses on assets.

· Interest in a company operating as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended. CIB Marine committed to a $0.5 million investment in this company and as of December 31, 2007 has invested $0.4 million. During 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine received a total capital distribution of $0.2 million on its investment in this company. During 2005, CIB Marine recognized a $0.1 million impairment loss on this investment due to a reduction in CIB Marine’s interest in the equity value of this investment. The impairment loss is included in write down and losses on assets. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine’s carrying value of this investment was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

· During the first quarter of 2007, CIB Marine sold its interest in a publicly traded company and recognized a $0.2 million gain on the sale which is included in write down and losses on assets. CIB Marine’s carrying value of this investment at December 31, 2006 was $0.4 million.

As members of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Home Loan Bank, certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks are required to maintain minimum amounts of Federal Reserve stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock as required by those institutions. These securities are “restricted” in that they are not publicly traded and can only be owned by members of the institutions.

In 2005, the FHLB Chicago Board disclosed its decision to discontinue redemption of excess, or voluntary, capital stock. Voluntary stock is stock held by members beyond the amount required as a condition of membership or to support advance borrowings. In April 2006, the FHLB Chicago announced plans to facilitate limited stock redemption requests from its members by issuing bonds. During 2006, the FHLB Chicago issued a limited amount of bonds to facilitate voluntary capital stock redemptions and CIB Marine sold back $14.3 million or 55.6% of its holdings. This represented approximately 58.7% of the stock CIB Marine requested to be redeemed at that time. In October 2007, the FHLB Chicago entered into a consensual Cease and Desist Order (“C&D”) with it regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Board (“Finance Board”). The order states that the Finance Board has determined that requiring the FHLB Chicago to take the actions specified in the C&D will improve the condition and practices of the FHLB Chicago, stabilize its capital, and provide the FHLB Chicago an opportunity to address the principal supervisory concerns identified by the Finance Board. Under the terms of the C&D, capital stock repurchases and redemptions, including redemptions upon membership withdrawal or other termination, are prohibited unless the Bank has received approval of the Director of the Office of Supervision of the Finance Board ("OS Director"). The order provides that the OS Director may approve a written request by the FHLB Chicago for proposed redemptions or repurchases if the OS Director determines that allowing the redemption or repurchase would be consistent with maintaining the capital adequacy of the FHLB Chicago and its continued safe and sound operations. The C&D also provides that dividend declarations are subject to the prior written approval of the OS Director and that the FHLB Chicago must submit a Capital Structure Plan to the Finance Board consistent with the requirements of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and Finance Board regulations. The FHLB Chicago did not declare any dividends for the last half of 2007. As of December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had $11.5 million in FHLB Chicago stock, of which $4.0 million was categorized as required.

85

Note 10 - Deposits

The aggregate amount of time deposits of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $169.0 million and $135.4 million, respectively. Included in time deposits are brokered deposits of $22.2 million at December 31, 2007 and $39.2 million at December 31, 2006.

At December 31, 2007, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:

	December 31, 2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
2008	$	375,807
2009		49,005
2010		15,198
2011		9,577
2012		14,135
Thereafter		179
	$	463,901

(1)Deposits held by branches classified as held for sale at December 31, 2007.

Note 11 - Short-Term Borrowings

Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term. Federal funds purchased generally represent one-day borrowings. Securities sold under repurchase agreements represent borrowings maturing within one year that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury and Government Agency Securities.

The following is a summary of short-term borrowings for each of the two years ended December 31:

	At Year end					For the Year
	Balance		Weighted-Average Rate			Daily Average Balances		Weighted-Average Rate			Highest Balances at Month End
	(Dollars in thousands)
2007
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under  repurchase agreements	$	16,276		3.17	%	$	23,412		4.23	%	$	28,555
Federal Home Loan Bank		67,100		3.90			15,044		4.35			67,100
Treasury, tax and loan note		2,240		3.59			872		5.68			2,848
Total short-term borrowings	$	85,616		3.76	%	$	39,328		4.31	%
2006
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under  repurchase agreements	$	23,625		4.79	%	$	19,109		4.21	%	$	23,624
Federal Home Loan Bank		—		—			3,088		5.57			12,000
Treasury, tax and loan note		4,028		5.04			718		4.47			4,028
Total short-term borrowings	$	27,653		4.83	%	$	22,915		4.40	%

86

At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine was not in compliance with certain asset quality, earnings and capital maintenance debt covenants of certain financial standby letters of credit it participated in with other banks. CIB Marine pledged securities to collateralize its obligation for these participated standby letters of credit and entered into forbearance agreements. The total value of securities pledged to other parties related to these participated standby letters of credit was $3.3 million and $4.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

During 2007, the availability of federal funds purchased by certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks with correspondent banks continued to be contingent on bank pledges of fixed income investment securities. The credit restrictions in effect at December 31, 2006 at the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window were lifted in the first quarter of 2007.

In 2004, CIB Marine entered into a Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Among other items, the Written Agreement requires CIB Marine to obtain Federal Reserve Bank approval before incurring additional borrowings or debt and pre-approval to pay interest on debentures.

Note 12 - Long-Term Borrowings

Long-term borrowings consist of borrowings having an original maturity of greater than one year.

FHLB

The following table presents information regarding amounts payable to the FHLB of Chicago. All of the borrowings shown in the following table are fixed rate borrowings.

December 31,										Scheduled Maturity		Callable Quarterly @ Par After
2007					2006
Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate
		(Dollars in thousands)
$	6,000		4.52	%	$	—		—	%		04/24/09		—
	3,000		4.49			—		—			10/26/09		—
	3,000		4.54			—		—			10/25/10		—
	—		—			2,000		5.09			02/20/08		02/20/01
$	12,000		4.52	%	$	2,000		5.09	%

CIB Marine is required to maintain qualifying collateral as security for both short-term and long-term FHLB borrowings. The debt to collateral ratio is dependent upon the type of collateral pledged and ranges from a 60% loan to value for 1-4 Family Loans (held for sale) to 95% on U.S. Treasury and Agency Obligation securities. As part of a collateral arrangement with the FHLB, CIB Marine had assets pledged with a collateral value of $93.6 million and $17.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These assets consisted of securities with a market value of $103.6 million and $19.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Junior Subordinated Debentures

CIB Marine had the following junior subordinated debentures outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006:

	December 31,
	2007		2006		Issue Date		Interest Rate			Maturity Date		Callable After
	(Dollars in thousands)
CIB Marine Capital Trust I	$	10,310	$	10,310		03/23/00		10.88	%		03/08/30		03/08/10
CIB Statutory Trust III		15,464		15,464		09/07/00		10.60			09/07/30		09/07/10
CIB Statutory Trust IV		15,464		15,464		02/22/01		10.20			02/22/31		02/22/11
CIB Statutory Trust V		20,619		20,619		09/27/02		Variable	(1)		09/27/32		09/30/07
Total junior subordinated debentures	$	61,857	$	61,857

(1)Three-month LIBOR + 3.40% adjusted quarterly.

87

CIB Marine has formed four statutory business trusts (“Trusts”) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and investing the proceeds thereof in junior subordinated debentures of CIB Marine. The trust preferred securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CIB Marine. The Trusts used the proceeds from issuing trust preferred securities and the issuance of its common securities to CIB Marine to purchase the junior subordinated debentures. Interest on the debentures and distributions on the trust preferred securities are payable either quarterly or semi-annually in arrears. CIB Marine has the right, at any time, as long as there are no continuing events of default, to defer payments of interest on the debentures for consecutive periods not exceeding five years; but not beyond the stated maturity of the debentures. As a result of the agreement entered into with its regulator, CIB Marine has elected to defer all such interest payments subsequent to December 31, 2003, and as a result the Trusts deferred distributions on its trust preferred securities. At December 31, 2007 and 2006 CIB Marine had accrued interest payable on its $61.9 million junior subordinated debentures of $30.3 million and $21.8 million, respectively. These amounts are included in accrued interest payable on the consolidated balance sheets. These amounts are included in accrued interest payable on the consolidated balance sheets. The maximum interest deferral period is five years and the Company will therefore be required to bring the Trust Preferred Securities' interest payments current in the first quarter of 2009. Management is evaluating all options to ensure the Company meets its obligations with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities. Throughout the deferral period, interest on the debentures continues to accrue. In addition, interest also accrues on all interest that was not paid when due, compounded quarterly or semi-annually. During the deferral period, CIB Marine may not pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire, or make a liquidation payment on its stock, or make any payment of principal, interest or premium, or redeem any similar debt securities of CIB Marine, subject to certain limitations. The trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption. The trust preferred securities qualify as regulatory capital, subject to regulatory limitations.

The Federal Reserve Board adopted a rule limiting the inclusion of junior subordinated debentures in the Tier 1 equity capital. The ruling limited the total restricted Tier 1 capital elements, including junior subordinated debentures, net of investment in trust, to 25% of total Tier 1 capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine included approximately $20.1 million of its junior subordinated debentures in total Tier 1 capital.

Note 13 - Other Liabilities

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Accounts payable	$	117	$	1,408
Accrual for unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit		725		725
Accrued real estate taxes		158		159
Accrued compensation and employee benefits		782		973
Accrued professional fees		448		1,070
Accrued other expenses		731		2,645
Fair value of derivatives		—		29
Other liabilities		258		360
	$	3,219	$	7,369

Accrued other expenses at December 31, 2006 includes a $1.8 million contingent liability related to the settlement of the Hadley litigation which was paid during the first quarter of 2007. See Note 18-Commitments and Contingencies for further information regarding this litigation.

Note 14 - Stockholders’ Equity

Receivables from Sale of Stock

Loans not sufficiently collateralized by assets other than CIB Marine stock and made by CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks to borrowers who used the proceeds to acquire CIB Marine stock are classified as receivables from sale of stock and are accounted for as a reduction of stockholders’ equity and recorded as receivables from sale of stock, unless the loan had been repaid prior to the issuance of the financial statements. The balances of loans classified as receivables from sale of stock totaled $0.1 million and $0.2 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Interest earned on these loans was $0.01 million in 2007, $0.01 million in 2006 and $0.04 million in 2005 and is included in interest and dividend income-loans.

88

Treasury Stock

Certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks have acquired CIB Marine stock through collection efforts when the borrowers defaulted on their loans. These shares are included in treasury stock at the lower of the loan balance or the estimated fair market value of CIB Marine’s stock at time of acquisition. Any loan balance in excess of the estimated fair market value of the stock and other collateral received was charged to the allowance for loan losses. Since these shares are not directly owned by CIB Marine they are not excluded from the number of shares outstanding. CIB Marine did not acquire or sell any shares during 2007, 2006 or 2005. Treasury Stock was $0.2 million at both December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Regulatory Capital

CIB Marine and its subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Pursuant to federal bank holding company and bank regulations, CIB Marine and each bank subsidiary are assigned to a capital category. The assigned capital category is largely determined by three ratios that are calculated in accordance with specific instructions included in the regulations: total risk adjusted capital, Tier 1 capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the bank subsidiaries must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the bank’s assets and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The banks’ capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. To be categorized as well capitalized, the bank subsidiaries must maintain total risk adjusted capital, Tier 1 capital and Tier 1 leverage ratios of 10.0%, 6.0% and 5.0%, respectively.

There are five capital categories defined in the regulations: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Classification of a subsidiary bank in any of the undercapitalized categories can result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

At December 31, 2007, pursuant to FDIC regulations in 12 C.F.R. Part 325, all of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks were classified as well capitalized.

At both December 31, 2007 and 2006, CIB Marine was subject to a Written Agreement (“Agreement”) it entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank in the second quarter of 2004 and Marine Bank was subject to a Memorandum of Understanding (“Memorandum”) it entered into with its respective banking regulators in March 2005. During the first quarter of 2007, the Cease and Desist Order Central Illinois Bank had entered into with its banking regulatory authorities in 2004 was replaced with a Memorandum of Understanding, and in the fourth quarter of 2007, this Memorandum of Understanding was terminated. Among other items, the Agreement and Memorandum in effect at December 31, 2007 restrict the payment of cash dividends without prior written consent from the regulators and require the bank to maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital level equal to or exceeding 8% of the bank’s total average assets. Failure to comply with the Agreement or Memorandum could have a material adverse effect on CIB Marine and its operations. As of December 31, 2007, the capital level of CIB Marine and Marine Bank exceeded the minimum levels required by their respective regulatory Agreement or Memoranda.

89

The actual and required capital amounts and ratios for CIB Marine and its bank subsidiaries are presented in the tables below.

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2007
Total capital to risk weighted assets
CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.	$	128,373		17.26	%	$	59,518		8.00	%	$	74,397
Central Illinois Bank		60,381		19.26			25,082		8.00			31,352		10.00	%
Marine Bank		50,023		14.82			27,012		8.00			33,765		10.00
Citrus Bank		19,855		21.87			7,261		8.00			9,077		10.00
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted  assets
CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.	$	79,026		10.62	%	$	29,759		4.00	%	$	44,638
Central Illinois Bank		56,399		17.99			12,541		4.00			18,811		6.00	%
Marine Bank		45,756		13.55			13,506		4.00			20,259		6.00
Citrus Bank		18,698		20.60			3,631		4.00			5,446		6.00
Tier 1 leverage to average  assets
CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.	$	79,026		7.92	%	$	39,908		4.00	%	$	49,885
Central Illinois Bank		56,399		12.18			18,525		4.00			23,156		5.00	%
Marine Bank (1)		45,756		11.31			16,177		4.00			20,221		5.00
Citrus Bank		18,698		15.03			4,976		4.00			6,220		5.00
December 31, 2006
Total capital to risk weighted  assets
CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.	$	141,308		20.95	%	$	53,965		8.00	%	$	67,456
Central Illinois Bank		59,389		20.18			23,545		8.00			29,432		10.00	%
Marine Bank		48,631		17.07			22,796		8.00			28,495		10.00
Citrus Bank		21,162		24.40			6,938		8.00			8,673		10.00
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted  assets
CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.	$	96,584		14.32	%	$	26,983		4.00	%	$	40,474
Central Illinois Bank		55,593		18.89			11,773		4.00			17,659		6.00	%
Marine Bank		45,041		15.81			11,398		4.00			17,097		6.00
Citrus Bank		20,069		23.14			3,469		4.00			5,204		6.00
Tier 1 leverage to average assets
CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.	$	96,584		9.51	%	$	40,632		4.00	%	$	50,790
Central Illinois Bank (1)		55,593		11.34			19,605		4.00			24,507		5.00	%
Marine Bank (1)		45,041		11.67			15,437		4.00			19,297		5.00
Citrus Bank		20,069		15.10			5,317		4.00			6,646		5.00

(1) Pursuant to the Order and/or Memorandum of Understanding in effect as of the period end, the bank is required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital level equal to or exceeding 8% of total average assets.

The payment of dividends by banking subsidiaries is subject to regulatory restrictions by various federal and/or state regulatory authorities. Pursuant to the Memorandum and Agreement and throughout such time as the Memorandum and Agreement remain in effect, Marine Bank may not pay a dividend to CIB Marine and CIB Marine cannot declare or pay dividends without first obtaining the consent of the regulators. In addition, dividends paid by bank subsidiaries are further limited if the effect would result in a bank subsidiary’s capital being reduced below applicable minimum capital amounts. CIB Marine did not receive any dividend payments from its subsidiary banks during 2007. At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks had retained earnings available for the payment of dividends to CIB Marine, subject to regulatory approval, in the total amount of $2.8 million.

Federal Deposit Insurance

As FDIC-insured institutions, each of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks are required to pay deposit insurance premiums based on the risk each poses to the FDIC insurance funds. In 2007, the FDIC had the authority to raise or lower assessment rates on insured deposits in order to achieve certain designated reserve ratios in the insurance funds and to impose special additional assessments. The FDIC had adopted a premium rate schedule, which provided for an assessment range of 0.05% to 0.43% of domestic deposits, depending on the capital category and supervisory category to which a bank is assigned. As of December 31, 2007, the assessment rate for Central Illinois Bank was 0.06%, Marine Bank was 0.11% and Citrus Bank was 0.01%. The FDIC’s risk-based insurance assessment system was amended by the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act in 2006. Under implementing regulations effective for 2007, each insured bank is placed in one of four risk categories based on its level of capital, supervisory ratings and other risk measures, including debt ratings for large institutions, and its insurance assessment rate is determined by its risk category. There is currently a 38 basis point spread between the highest and lowest assessment rates, so that banks classified by the FDIC in Risk Category I are subject in 2008 to an insurance assessment of five to seven basis points (according to the FDIC’s assessment of the bank’s strength), and banks classified by the FDIC in Risk Category IV are subject to an insurance assessment rate of 0.43%.

90

The FDIC is authorized to terminate an institution’s deposit insurance upon a finding by the FDIC that the institution’s financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or has violated any applicable rule, regulation, order or condition enacted or imposed by the institution’s regulatory agency. The termination of deposit insurance for CIB Marine’s banks would have a material adverse effect on CIB Marine. In addition to its insurance assessment, each insured institution is subject to quarterly debt service assessments in connection with bonds issued by the government corporation that financed the federal savings and loan bailout. The quarterly debt service assessment rate for all banks was 0.0114%.

In October 2006, the FDIC Board of Directors approved a One-Time Assessment Credit. CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks received a $0.6 million credit of which $0.2 million was used to offset the FDIC insurance premium expense during 2007. The remaining balance of the credit will be recorded as a credit against future FDIC insurance premiums until the credit is exhausted.

Note 15 - Other Expense

Other expense consisted of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007		2006		2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Payroll and other processing charges	$	112	$	99	$	125
Correspondent bank charges		190		256		291
Advertising/marketing		781		722		1,135
Communications		964		1,386		1,310
Supplies and printing		284		357		581
Shipping and handling		454		523		703
Collection expense		17		43		248
FDIC and state assessment		484		1,289		1,768
Recording and filing fees		192		149		185
Foreclosed property		17		7		46
Other expense		2,431		4,446		3,053
Total other expense	$	5,926	$	9,277	$	9,445

Note 16-Loss Per Share

The following provides a reconciliation of basic and diluted loss per share:

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Loss from continuing operations	$	(15,211	)	$	(9,839	)	$	(13,144	)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		18,333,779			18,333,779			18,333,779
Effect of dilutive stock options outstanding		—			—			—
Diluted		18,333,779			18,333,779			18,333,779
Per share loss:
Basic	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.72	)
Effect of dilutive stock options outstanding		—			—			—
Diluted	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.72	)

Because CIB Marine has a net loss from continuing operations in each of the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, options to purchase 1,151,533; 971,830; and 778,000 share, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their assumed exercise would be anti-dilutive.

91

Note 17-Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The following table summarizes the contractual or notional amount of off-balance sheet financial instruments with credit risk.

	December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	174,329	$	157,851
Standby letters of credit		5,886		5,637
Interest rate swaps		15,527		15,675

CIB Marine is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. CIB Marine has entered into commitments to extend credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheets.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments that CIB Marine issues to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. Fees received to issue standby letters of credit are deferred and recognized as noninterest income over the term of the commitment. The guarantees frequently support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper issuances, bond funding, and other similar transactions. CIB Marine issues commercial letters of credit on behalf of customers to ensure payments or collection in connection with trade transactions. In the event of a customer’s nonperformance, CIB Marine’s credit loss exposure is the same as in any extension of credit, up to the letter’s contractual amount. Management assesses the borrower’s financial condition to determine the necessary collateral, which may include marketable securities, real estate, accounts receivable and inventory. Since the conditions requiring CIB Marine to fund letters of credit may not occur, CIB Marine expects its future cash requirements to be less than the total outstanding commitments. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by CIB Marine under standby letter of credit arrangements at December 31, 2007 and 2006, is $5.9 million and $5.6 million, respectively, with a weighted average term of approximately 8 months at both December 31, 2007 and 2006. CIB Marine has accrued liabilities of $0.7 million at both December 31, 2007 and 2006 for probable losses related to certain standby letters of credit. The standby letters of credit for which reserves were established were participated to nonaffiliated banks. CIB Marine did not default on any payment obligations with the other banks.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. CIB Marine evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness and determines the amount of the collateral necessary based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies, but may include marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventories, property and equipment, and real estate.

At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine is primarily involved with derivative financial instruments in the form of interest rate swaps utilized for purposes of asset/liability management to modify the existing market risk characteristics of certain hedged assets and liabilities. An interest rate swap agreement involves the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest payment obligations based on the underlying notional principal amounts. The amounts subject to market and credit risks are the streams of interest payments under the agreements and not the notional principal amounts, which are used only to express the volume of the transactions. CIB Marine’s credit risk on a swap agreement is limited to nonperformance of the counterparty’s obligations under the terms of the swap agreement. CIB Marine generally deals with counterparties that have high credit ratings, and based on management’s assessments, all counterparties were expected to meet any outstanding obligations as of December 31, 2007.

CIB Marine had $10.0 million notional value of receive fixed/pay floating interest rate swaps outstanding as of December 31, 2007 used to hedge fixed rate deposits with matching interest payment frequencies, maturities, option features and amounts. As of December 31, 2007, these swaps received Fair Value Hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133. CIB Marine had $5.6 million notional value of pay fixed/receive floating interest rate swaps outstanding as of December 31, 2007 used to hedge fixed rate loans. These swaps are accounted for as Fair Value Hedges under SFAS 133 as of December 31, 2007. Market value changes during the period of the interest rate swaps and the hedged assets are reflected in other noninterest income in the statement of operations.

92

The fair value of derivatives that fail to qualify as a hedge and the ineffective position of derivatives that do qualify as a hedge is charged to other expense or credited to other income in the period of the change in fair value. Such amounts charged to net income was $0.01 million, in both 2007 and 2006 and $0.1 million in 2005. The fair value adjustment of warrants charged to net income in both 2006 and 2005 was $0.1 million.

Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies

Material pending litigation, other than that of a routine nature in the ordinary course of business, is as follows:

In August 2003, Keith Burchett, a shareholder of CIB Marine and a borrower of CIB Marine’s former subsidiary CIB Bank (Hillside, Illinois) (“CIB-Chicago”), commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against CIB Marine, Central Illinois Bank, CIB-Chicago and two of their now former directors and/or officers for damages arising out of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations relative to the financial condition of Canron and its principal shareholder by defendants to induce the plaintiff to borrow money from CIB-Chicago and make a $0.5 million investment in Canron. Plaintiff asserts claims for fraud and shareholder remedies. The shareholder alleges the defendants violated lending regulations causing a decline in the plaintiff’s investment in CIB Marine. Plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages, requests an order requiring CIB Marine and the banks to repurchase his CIB Marine shares of stock at fair value, and other forms of relief. While the outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend this action. Central Illinois Bank has been removed as a defendant in subsequent amended complaints filed by the plaintiff. On November 30, 2004, CIB Marine sold CIB-Chicago. On January 11, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the litigation. The court has not ruled on this motion.

In June 2004, Central Illinois Bank commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Champaign County, Illinois, against John C. Hadley and Mary Lydia Hadley, CIB Marine’s largest individual shareholders at the time, for damages arising out of the Hadleys’ default in December 2003 of certain loan obligations (the “State Litigation”) and subsequently obtained a confession of judgment. The loans approximate $9.7 million plus interest and attorneys fees and were secured by CIB Marine stock and the accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and other personal property of the borrowers and their restaurant supply and coin businesses. In December 2004, the Hadleys consented to the entry of an order for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois (the “Bankruptcy Case”). The Hadleys stayed the State Litigation and, in the first quarter of 2006, the Hadleys filed a counterclaim against Central Illinois Bank in the dischargeability adversary proceeding that sought to recover $35.0 million in actual damages and punitive damages for the alleged loss or substitution by Central Illinois Bank of certain rare coins and collectibles which the Hadleys alleged were pledged to the bank as collateral, sought to recover certain alleged preferential transfers and sought to equitably subordinate the bank’s claim to those of unsecured creditors. Central Illinois Bank and the Hadleys have settled these matters with the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. According to the settlement agreement, the adversary complaint and counterclaims in the Bankruptcy Court and the State Litigation were dismissed with prejudice and without admitting any fault or liability; the parties exchanged mutual general releases of claims among the Hadleys, Central Illinois Bank and its parent and affiliated corporations, preserving only the Hadleys’ claims as members of a putative plaintiff class in an action currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin entitled Dennis Lewis, et al. v. CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc., et al., Case No. 05-C-1008 or as individual plaintiffs in an “opt out” action against some or all of the same parties alleging substantially the same claims; and Central Illinois Bank discharged, waived, released and assigned its claims in the Bankruptcy Case to the Hadleys’ bankruptcy estate, returned to the Hadleys’ bankruptcy estate all collateral security held by Central Illinois Bank and paid the bankruptcy estate $1.75 million in the first quarter of 2007. CIB Marine recorded a $1.75 million contingent liability expense in the first quarter of 2006 related to the settlement.

In June 2004, John C. Ruedi, a former employee of CIB Marine, filed an action against CIB Marine and “Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.” in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial District, Champaign County, Illinois for rescission or damages, including punitive damages, in connection with plaintiff’s October 1, 2002 exercise of options issued by CIB Marine to acquire 36,688 shares of CIB Marine common stock at various exercise prices. Plaintiff claims that but for CIB Marine’s and Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.’s alleged fraudulent concealment of material facts regarding the financial condition of CIB Marine he would not have exercised his options. Plaintiff also seeks to recover from Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc. and CIB Marine in excess of $40,000 allegedly due Plaintiff pursuant to a purported memorandum providing for the payment of an incentive to Plaintiff in connection with his employment. In March 2005, Plaintiff amended his complaint to add the former President and CEO of CIB Marine as a defendant based upon claims of alleged fraudulent concealment. Claims filed in the action against CIB Marine’s independent registered public accounting firm KPMG LLP (hereinafter “KPMG”) and a now retired partner of KPMG were voluntarily dismissed by the Plaintiff. CIB Marine filed a motion to dismiss several of Plaintiff’s claims and answered the others denying liability. That motion to dismiss was denied and CIB Marine answered the remaining counts against it, denying liability. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment seeking recovery of $40,000 from CIB Marine on his incentive payment claim. This motion was denied. All discovery had been stayed in this action by an order of the Federal Court in the Lewis case described later in this section. Plaintiff had filed a motion in the Lewis case to vacate the discovery stay in this case, which CIB Marine and the other defendants in the Lewis case opposed. When defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings was denied in the Lewis case on March 3, 2008, the Court denied the motion to vacate the stay of discovery as moot. While the ultimate outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend the action.

93

On June 3, 2005, a first consolidated complaint was filed by Dennis Lewis, a shareholder, and other alleged shareholders of CIB Marine in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Urbana Division, against CIB Marine, certain of its current and former officers and directors and KPMG. The filing consolidated two actions that had been filed in January 2005: one filed by Lewis in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Urbana Division and another filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Peoria Division by Elaine Sollberger, a purported shareholder, whose claims were voluntarily dismissed in connection with the consolidation and have not been reasserted in the consolidated complaint. Plaintiffs sought to maintain the action as a class action on behalf of all persons who purchased common stock of CIB Marine between April 12, 1999 and April 12, 2004, claiming violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by CIB Marine and other defendants and liability of certain defendants other than CIB Marine and KPMG under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as controlling persons. The substance of the complaint is that the financial condition of CIB Marine was overstated with the result that members of the purported class acquired their CIB Marine stock at inflated prices. Plaintiffs seek money damages, interest, attorneys’ fees and costs. The federal court in Urbana, Illinois granted the motion of CIB Marine and several other defendants to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where the action is now pending.

All defendants moved to dismiss the action on various grounds. On October 12, 2006 the court denied CIB Marine’s motion to dismiss, granted in part the motions to dismiss filed by the individual defendants and granted the motion to dismiss filed by KPMG. CIB Marine and the individual defendants filed answers to the pending complaint denying any liability. An additional person has moved to intervene as a plaintiff in the action. In light of a recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that addressed the pleading standards that must be satisfied by the plaintiff in a case such as this one, on July 16, 2007 CIB Marine and the individual defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alternative, a motion for reconsideration of the ruling on the motion to dismiss, seeking dismissal of the action on the ground that the plaintiffs have not satisfactorily pleaded one of the essential elements of their cause of action. On March 3, 2008, the Court denied that motion.

On November 10, 2006, plaintiffs filed a further amended complaint as to KPMG, which KPMG moved to dismiss. On August 13, 2007, the court granted KPMG’s motion and dismissed the action as to it.

As a result of the filing of the initial motions to dismiss, all discovery in this action was stayed automatically. Plaintiffs have moved to vacate that stay of discovery, which all defendants opposed based on KPMG’s pending motion to dismiss the further amended complaint filed by plaintiffs against KPMG. In granting KPMG’s motion to dismiss, the court noted the pendency of the motion for judgment on the pleadings described above and ruled that the stay of discovery remained in place. Plaintiffs filed a separate motion for a limited lift of the stay of discovery, which CIB Marine and the individual defendants opposed in their response filed on September 11, 2007. In denying the motion for judgment on the pleadings as described above, the Court denied the motions to vacate the stay as moot, i.e., with the denial of the motion for judgment on the pleadings discovery may now proceed.

94

CIB Marine intends to vigorously contest certification of any class and to otherwise vigorously defend this action. The ultimate outcome of this action cannot be determined at this time.

In April 2005, James Fasano and Thomas Arundel, shareholders of CIB Marine and borrowers of CIB-Chicago, commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against CIB Marine, CIB-Chicago and two of their now former directors and/or officers for damages arising out of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations relative to the financial condition of Canron and its principal shareholder to induce the plaintiffs to borrow $0.5 million from CIB-Chicago and invest it in Canron. Plaintiffs assert claims for fraud and shareholder remedies. The shareholder alleges the defendants violated lending regulations which caused a decline in the plaintiffs’ investment in CIB Marine. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages, request an order requiring CIB Marine and the bank to repurchase their CIB Marine shares of stock at fair value and other forms of relief. While the outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend this action. On November 30, 2004, CIB Marine sold CIB-Chicago. On January 11, 2008, plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the litigation. The Court has not ruled on this motion.

In December 2003, CIB-Chicago acquired the title to a commercial office building that was being converted into residential condominiums. The property was acquired through a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Settlement Agreement (“DIL Agreement”) from a borrower who was in default on its obligation. The property was included in foreclosed properties at December 31, 2003. Pursuant to the DIL Agreement, CIB-Chicago acquired the property subject to the first lien held by an unaffiliated financial institution and assumed the borrower’s financial obligation relating to that first lien. At December 31, 2003, the assumed financial obligation was reported as an outstanding non-recourse mortgage note payable. During the second quarter of 2004, CIB-Chicago transferred all of its rights, title and interest in the property, along with the borrower’s obligation under the related mortgage note, to the first lien holder. CIB-Chicago transferred the property based upon its evaluation that the amount of additional funds necessary to complete the project was greater than the financial benefits and risks associated therewith. The property was transferred without any further liability or obligation to the first lien position holder and CIB-Chicago reserved its legal rights to pursue the borrower and guarantors. The transfer to the first lien holder resulted in no additional gain or loss to CIB Marine. During 2003, CIB Marine charged-off $41.7 million of the loan to its allowance for loan loss with respect to this borrowing relationship and also recorded a $1.5 million market value write down on the property. In July 2004, CIB-Chicago commenced litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against the borrower, guarantors and their related interests for collection of the losses incurred by CIB Marine based upon state law claims of breach of agreements, fraud, conversion and other theories of recovery, including Federal RICO violations. In November 2004, CIB-Chicago assigned the loans and claims related to this development to CIB Marine in conjunction with the sale of CIB-Chicago. In April 2005, the United States District Court dismissed the RICO claim and, as a result, lacked jurisdiction over the state law claims. In April 2005, CIB Marine commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against the defendants on the state law claims. On February 1, 2008, the Court dismissed the action against one of the guarantors on the grounds that CIB-Chicago was precluded from pursuing collection from the guarantor until the first lienholder was paid in full pursuant to the language of a restructuring agreement entered into by CIB-Chicago, the first lienholder and the guarantor. CIB Marine intends to appeal the dismissal. In the event that there are any recoveries with respect to these loans and claims, CIB Marine has agreed to pay the purchaser of CIB-Chicago ten percent of any recovery after collection costs. To date, CIB Marine has not made any recoveries with respect to such loans and claims.

On April 20, 2006, Mark A. Sindecuse filed an action in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division (St. Louis) against CIB Marine, Dean M. Katsaros (“Katsaros”), a former director of CIB Marine, and Katsaros & Associates, Inc. The complaint, as amended, purported to assert common law causes of action against CIB Marine for fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with plaintiff’s purchases of common stock of CIB Marine in private placements in 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998. Plaintiff sought compensatory damages in excess of $2 million and unspecified punitive damages. After a motion to dismiss the amended complaint resulted in the dismissal of the negligent misrepresentation claims against it, CIB Marine filed an answer denying any liability to plaintiff and a motion for summary judgment on the remaining claim. On August 28, 2007, following Plaintiff’s withdrawal of two of the three remaining claims against Katsaros, the Court granted CIB Marine and Katsaros summary judgment on the sole remaining claim and dismissed the lawsuit. On September 24, 2007, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the judgment to the United State Court of Appeal for the Eighth Circuit. The appeal is fully briefed, with no argument currently scheduled.

95

CIB Marine and the individual defendants in the Ruedi, Burchett, Fasano/Arundel and Lewis cases described above, are insureds under a policy that on its face purports to provide coverage for those cases, including advancement of reimbursement for the costs of defense (payment of which by the insured reduces the remaining coverage under the policy), which include attorneys’ fees, subject to a retention. The insurer had reserved all rights and notified CIB Marine and the other insureds of potential grounds to deny coverage. After CIB Marine exhausted the retention under that policy, the insurer paid substantially all of the costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individual defendants in the Ruedi and Lewis cases through February 17, 2006 subject to its reservation of rights to seek reimbursement (and through March 31, 2007 in the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases). The insurer informed the insureds of its intention to terminate any further funding of the costs of defense.

Negotiations ensued and CIB Marine and the insurer discussed an arrangement in which the insurer would pay 35% of the costs of defense of the Ruedi and Lewis cases incurred by CIB Marine and the individual defendants and CIB Marine would pay the remaining 65% of those reasonable costs. The parties negotiated the terms of their agreement, which was reflected in a written agreement accepted by the insurer, but was not executed by the parties. Pending addressing open issues with regard to expanding the scope of this agreement to include the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases, the insurer informed the insureds that it would not sign the agreement regarding the Lewis and Ruedi cases. The insurer contends that the act of plaintiff’s counsel in Lewis providing an affidavit from Ruedi to the court in connection with one of the pending motions regarding vacating the stay of discovery gives the insurer grounds to invoke an exclusion under the policy that applies when an insured under the policy, which the insurer contends Ruedi is, assists a plaintiff, such as Lewis, in the prosecution of a case against other insureds, such as the Lewis case. Accordingly, the insurer has advised the insureds that it will no longer pay any of the costs of defense of the Lewis case. CIB Marine understands that this refusal also applies to any judgment that may be entered against any insured in Lewis.

CIB Marine is considering its options in response to this position of the insurer. With respect to the individual defendants, the payment of defense costs by CIB Marine is pursuant to the provision of its by-laws that mandates advancing defense costs of directors and officers under certain circumstances and a full reservation of rights under the policy by both parties. The advances to individuals are subject to repayment by the individual defendants if it is ultimately determined, as provided in the by-laws and applicable Wisconsin law, that they are not entitled to be indemnified. The agreement with the insurer provided that either CIB Marine or the insurer could terminate the funding arrangement under certain circumstances. In the event of termination, CIB Marine would be responsible for all of the reasonable costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individual defendants.

With respect to the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases, after CIB Marine exhausted retention under that policy, the insurer paid substantially all of the costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individuals through March 31, 2007, subject to its reservation of rights. On March 14, 2007, the insurer informed the insureds of its intention to terminate funding of all of the costs of defense in those actions on or after April 1, 2007 and proposed a funding arrangement comparable to that discussed with respect to the Ruedi and Lewis cases. No agreement has been reached with respect to post-April 1, 2007 funding of defense costs in the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases. With respect to the individual defendants, the payment of these defense costs by CIB Marine is being made pursuant to the provision of its by-laws that mandates advancing defense costs of directors and officers under certain circumstances and a full reservation of rights under the policy by both parties. The advances to individuals are subject to repayment by the individual defendants if it is ultimately determined, as provided in the by-laws and applicable Wisconsin law, that they are not entitled to be indemnified.

It is not possible to estimate the amount or timing of the defense costs that will be paid by CIB Marine from and after February 17, 2006 in the Ruedi and Lewis cases or in the other cases described above. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ from those described in the preceding forward-looking statement and affect the amount and timing of the expenses referred to with respect to the Ruedi and Lewis cases: (1) the scope of discovery that is allowed by the court; (2) the extent, if any, to which the Lewis case is allowed to proceed as a class action; (3) the scope of discovery pursued by the plaintiffs (and the timing and substance of the court’s rulings on any objections thereto by defendants); (4) the extent to which CIB Marine and the individual defendants and their respective counsel are able to coordinate their defense of the action and in particular minimize duplication of activities in defense of the case; (5) the final determination by the insurer as to the amounts it is prepared to pay pursuant to the policy referenced above; (6) CIB Marine’s determination of what costs of defense are “reasonable” within the meaning of its by-laws and any claims made by individual defendants whose costs of defense may be rejected in whole or in part on that ground; and (7) the extent to which any individual defendant whose costs of defense are advanced by CIB Marine is ultimately required to repay those costs and, if so, the ability of that person to make repayment.

96

Note 19-Stock Option Plans

CIB Marine has a nonqualified stock option and incentive plan for its employees and directors. At December 31, 2007, options to purchase 337,703 shares were available for future grant. The plan provides for the options to be exercisable over a ten-year period beginning one year from the date of the grant, provided the participant has remained in the employ of, or on the Board of Directors of, CIB Marine and/or one of its subsidiaries. The plan also provides that the exercise price of the options granted may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the option grant date. Options vest over five years. CIB Marine issues new shares upon the exercise of options.

The following table shows activity relating to stock options.

	Number of Shares			Range of Option Prices per Share		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Shares under option at December 31, 2004		791,331		$	8.50-23.66	$	16.35
Granted		523,750		$	4.10	$	4.10	$	1.47
Lapsed or surrendered		(293,594	)		4.10-23.66		13.63
Exercised		—			—		—
Shares under option at December 31, 2005		1,021,487		$	4.10-23.66	$	10.85
Granted		483,750		$	4.10	$	4.10	$	0.76
Lapsed or surrendered		(332,916	)		4.10-23.66		9.44
Exercised		—			—		—
Shares under option at December 31, 2006		1,172,321		$	4.10-22.89	$	8.47
Granted		325,500		$	3.70-4.10	$	3.79	$	0.43
Lapsed or surrendered		(199,794	)		4.10-22.89		11.20
Exercised		—			—		—
Shares under option at December 31, 2007		1,298,027		$	3.70-22.89	$	6.87
Shares exercisable at December 31, 2007		485,277		$	4.10-22.89	$	11.73

The following table shows activity relating to nonvested stock options:

Nonvested stock options at December 31, 2005	493,963
Granted	483,750
Vested	(73,050	)
Forfeited	(201,113	)
Nonvested stock options at December 31, 2006	703,550
Granted	325,500
Vested	(146,950	)
Foreited	(69,350	)
Nonvested stock options at December 31, 2007	812,750

97

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007.

	Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
			Weighted
	Number of		Average				Weighted		Number of		Weighted
	Shares		Remaining		Average		Shares		Average		Average
Range of Option Prices	Outstanding at 12/31/07		Contractual Life (Years)		Exercise Price		Exercisable at 12/31/07		Exercise Prices		Contractual Term
$ 3.70 — 4.10		1,010,250		8.78	$	4.00		197,500	$	4.10
10.90 — 13.89		102,750		0.15		13.07		102,750		13.07
13.90 — 16.89		56,550		1.58		16.24		56,550		16.24
16.90 — 19.89		71,534		2.57		18.40		71,534		18.40
19.90 — 22.89		56,943		3.91		22.89		56,943		22.89
$ 3.70 — 22.89		1,298,027		7.23	$	6.87		485,277	$	11.73		4.36

Note 20-Other Benefit Plans

CIB Marine provides a defined contribution 401(k) plan to all employees of CIB Marine and its subsidiaries who have attained age 18. As of August 2006, employees may enter the Plan on the first day of the month following sixty days of employment. The plan permits participants to make voluntary tax deferred contributions up to the maximum permitted by law. Participants age 50 or older are allowed to make a stated amount of additional contributions on a tax deferred basis as permitted by law. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, the matching contribution was 50% of the employee’s contribution up to 6% of compensation. The total expenses incurred for employer matching contributions to the plan were $0.1 million in 2007, $0.3 million in 2006 and $0.4 million in 2005. All administrative costs to maintain the plan are paid by the plan.

CIB Marine has an employee stock ownership plan for the benefit of employees who attain a certain number of hours worked and length of service. At December 31, 2007, the plan held 205,836 shares of common stock, all of which have been allocated to participants. CIB Marine recognizes compensation expense for its contributions to the plan. CIB Marine did not make contributions to the plan in either 2007, 2006 or 2005. Contributions are discretionary and are determined annually by the Board of Directors. The administrative costs to maintain the plan are paid by the plan.

Note 21-Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes (benefits) on income (loss) from continuing operations in the consolidated statements of operations consisted of the following components:

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Current tax provision (benefit):
Federal	$	53		$	(78	)	$	(1,152	)
State		(50	)		(21	)		(56	)
Deferred (benefit)		—			—			—
	$	3		$	(99	)	$	(1,208	)

A reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) and income taxes from continuing operations, which would have been provided by applying the federal statutory rate of 35%, is as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2007						2006						2005
	Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Income tax benefit at statutory tax rate	$	(5,323	)		(35.0	)%	$	(3,478	)		(35.0	)%	$	(5,023	)		(35.0	)%
Increase (reduction) in tax rate resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal income tax effect		178			1.2			12			0.1			(63	)		(0.4	)
Tax-exempt interest		(202	)		(1.3	)		(337	)		(3.4	)		(548	)		(3.8	)
Affordable housing credits		(360	)		(2.4	)		(360	)		(3.6	)		(359	)		(2.5	)
Valuation allowance		5,666			37.2			3,978			40.0			4,163			29.0
Other, net		44			0.3			86			0.9			622			4.3
	$	3			(0.0	)%	$	(99	)		(1.0	)%	$	(1,208	)		(8.4	)%

98

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to net deferred tax (liabilities)/assets reported in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows:

	December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Loss carryforwards (1)	$	66,176		$	59,678		$	53,121
Tax credit carryforwards		2,537			2,177			1,817
Allowance for loan losses		8,279			8,221			9,759
Net unrealized loss in securities available for sale		—			746			1,322
Other real estate owned		—			4			498
Other		1,919			1,435			2,081
Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance		78,911			72,261			68,598
Valuation allowance		(76,868	)		(71,202	)		(67,193	)
Net deferred tax assets		2,043			1,059			1,405
Deferred tax liabilities:
Fixed assets	$	275		$	388		$	429
Net unrealized loss in securities available for sale		515			—			—
Other		1,253			671			976
Total deferred tax liabilities		2,043			1,059			1,405
Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—		$	—

(1)Includes U.S. federal and state net operating, capital loss and charitable contribution carryforwards.

With respect to continuing and discontinued operations, there were U.S. federal net operating loss, capital loss and charitable contribution carryforwards of approximately $165.8 million, $150.1 million and $141.9 million and state net operating loss, capital loss and charitable contribution carryforwards of approximately $238.4 million, $225.2 million and $207.6 million at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In 2004, the sale of CIB-Chicago resulted in a capital loss of $73.2 million. The net operating loss carryforwards will expire in varying amounts between 2008 and 2026. $13.5 million of the U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards were acquired in connection with the Canron acquisition, of which $6.7 million will not be available due to separate return year limitations. Included in the carryforwards at December 31, 2007 are $69.2 million of capital loss carryforwards, of which $0.3 million is attributable to Canron. The capital loss carryforwards expire in 2008 and 2009.

CIB Marine had Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards of $0.7 million at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. $0.1 million of the AMT credit carryforward was acquired in connection with the Canron acquisition. There were also $2.0 million of General Business Credit carryforwards at December 31, 2007, which will expire in varying amounts between 2008 and 2012.

Realization of the net deferred tax assets over time is dependent upon the existence of taxable income in carryback periods or CIB Marine generating sufficient taxable earnings in future periods. In determining whether the realization of the net deferred tax asset was more likely than not, CIB Marine gave consideration to a number of factors including its recent earnings history, its expectations for earnings in the future, including tax planning strategies and, where applicable, the expiration dates associated with tax carryforwards.

Due to the significant losses in 2006 and 2007 and the expectation of additional losses in 2008, management has determined that it is not more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007 will be realized in their entirety. As of December 31, 2005, no U.S. federal or state loss carryback potential remains. Therefore, a valuation allowance has been provided by way of a charge to federal and state tax expense to reduce the net U.S. federal and state deferred tax asset to zero.

99

Additionally, in 2005 Canron had a net reduction in prior year exposure items of $0.4 million related to certain individually insignificant items.

Note 22-Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The table below summarizes the information required by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“SFAS 107”).

	December 31, 2007
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	74,841	$	74,841
Loans held for sale		—		—
Securities		316,321		316,321
Loans, net		574,553		581,068
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock		12,298		12,298
Accrued interest receivable		5,839		5,839
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		745,590		743,189
Short-term borrowings		85,616		85,616
Long-term borrowings		12,000		12,094
Junior subordinated debentures		61,857		65,275
Accrued interest payable		33,223		33,223

	December 31, 2007
	Contractual or Notional Amount		Carrying Amount			Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Off-balance sheet items:
Commitments to extend credit	$	174,329	$	—		$	—
Standby letters of credit (1)		5,886		(753	)		(753	)
Interest rate swap agreements		15,527		39			39

	December 31, 2006
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	115,135	$	115,135
Loans held for sale		80		80
Securities		333,288		333,288
Loans, net		501,718		502,800
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock		12,314		12,314
Accrued interest receivable		5,582		5,582
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		739,784		737,787
Deposits of branches held for sale		55,365		55,216
Short-term borrowings		27,653		27,653
Long-term borrowings		2,000		2,014
Junior subordinated debentures		61,857		64,832
Accrued interest payable		24,940		24,940

100

	December 31, 2006
	Contractual or Notional Amount		Carrying Amount			Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Off-balance sheet items:
Commitments to extend credit	$	157,851	$	—		$	—
Standby letters of credit (1)		5,637		(749	)		(749	)
Interest rate swap agreements		15,675		(28	)		(28	)

(1) Includes an accrued liability for probable losses on unfunded commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit of $0.7 million at both December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Fair value amounts represent estimates of value at a point in time. Significant estimates regarding economic conditions, loss experience, risk characteristics associated with particular financial instruments and other factors were used for the purposes of this disclosure. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve matters of judgment. Therefore, they cannot be determined with precision. Changes in the assumptions could have a material impact on the amounts estimated.

While these estimated fair value amounts are designed to represent estimates of the amounts at which these instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, it is CIB Marine’s intent to holdmost of its financial instruments to maturity. Therefore, it is not probable that the fair values shown will be realized in a current transaction.

The estimated fair values disclosed do not reflect the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the value of long-term relationships with depositors (core deposit intangibles) is not reflected. The value of this item is significant.

Because of the wide range of valuation techniques and the numerous estimates that must be made, it may be difficult to make reasonable comparisons of CIB Marine’s fair value to that of other financial institutions. It is important that the many uncertainties discussed above be considered when using the estimated fair value disclosures and to realize that because of these uncertainties the aggregate fair value should in no way be construed as representative of the underlying value of CIB Marine.

The following describes the methodology and assumptions used to estimate fair value of financial instruments required by SFAS 107.

101

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value. For purposes of this disclosure only, cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, Federal Funds sold and repurchase agreements.

Available for Sale Securities

The estimated fair values of securities by type are provided in Note 3-Securities. These are based on quoted market prices, when available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities or carrying values.

Loans held for Sale

The fair value of loans held for sale, primarily conventional residential mortgage loans, are estimated using current market prices for similar mortgages in the market.

Loans Receivable

For loans that reprice frequently, the carrying value approximates their value. The fair values of all other loans receivable were estimated by discounting the expected future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and maturities. The carrying value and the fair value of loans receivable is net of the allowance for loan losses.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair values.

Deposit Liabilities

The carrying value of deposits with no stated maturity approximates their fair value as they are payable on demand. The estimated fair value of fixed time deposits is based on discounted cash flow analyses. The discount rates used in these analyses are based on market rates of alternative funding sources currently available for similar remaining maturities.

Short-term Borrowings

The carrying value of short-term borrowings payable within three months or less approximates their fair value. The estimated fair value of borrowed funds with a maturity greater than three months is based on quoted market prices, when available. Debt for which quoted prices were not available was valued using cash flows discounted at a current market rate for similar types of debt. For purposes of this disclosure, short-term borrowings are those borrowings with stated final maturities of less than or equal to one year, including securities sold under agreements to repurchase, U.S. Treasury tax and loan notes, lines of credit, commercial paper and other similar borrowings.

Long-term Borrowings

The carrying value of long-term borrowings payable within three months or less approximates their fair value. The estimated fair value of borrowed funds with a maturity greater than three months is based on quoted market prices, when available. Debt for which quoted prices were not available was valued using cash flows discounted at a current market rate for similar types of debt. For purposes of this disclosure, long-term borrowings are those borrowings with stated final maturity of more than one year, including Federal Home Loan Bank advances with stated final maturity of more than one year. Notwithstanding their stated final maturity of more than one year, junior subordinated debentures are excluded from long-term borrowings.

Junior Subordinated Debentures

The estimated fair value of junior subordinated debentures was valued using option adjusted spread valuation models with an option free spread approximating a non-investment grade credit quality.

102

Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amounts of accrued interest are used to approximate their fair values.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments

The fair value and carrying value of letters of credit and unused and open ended lines of credit have been estimated based on the unearned fees charged for those commitments net of accrued liability for probable losses.

The fair value of interest rate swaps is based upon quoted market prices, when available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated based on the net of the discounted cash flows of the fixed leg and the floating leg of the swap using as a discount rate currently existing rates available for swaps of comparable remaining term, notional value, index and counterparty credit risk.

103

Note 23  - Parent Company Financial Statements

The condensed financial statements of the parent company only, are presented as follows:

Condensed Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from affiliated banks	$	25,747		$	30,648
Investments in subsidiaries		121,605			120,187
Loans to subsidiaries		608			100
Premises and equipment, net		764			1,035
Investment in subsidiaries held for disposal		(2,969	)		(3,235	)
Other investments		3,141			3,460
Income tax receivable		2,593			2,469
Other assets		1,878			2,163
Total assets	$	153,367		$	156,827
Liabilities
Loans to subsidiaries-subscribed stock	$	121		$	151
Accrued interest payable		30,258			21,757
Junior subordinated debentures		61,857			61,857
Other liabilities		825			1,449
Total liabilities		93,061			85,214
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		—			—
Common stock, $1 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 18,346,442 issued and outstanding		18,346			18,346
Capital surplus		158,398			158,266
Accumulated deficit		(117,537	)		(102,806	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net		1,382			(1,880	)
Receivables from sale of stock		(121	)		(151	)
Treasury stock at cost, 12,663 shares		(162	)		(162	)
Total stockholders’ equity		60,306			71,613
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	153,367		$	156,827

104

Condensed Statements of Operations

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest and Dividend Income
Dividends from subsidiaries	$	—		$	1,575		$	2,650
Loan and other interest from subsidiaries		1,216			1,332			907
Total interest and dividend income		1,216			2,907			3,557
Interest Expense
Junior subordinated debentures		8,556			7,742			6,636
Total interest expense		8,556			7,742			6,636
Net interest loss		(7,340	)		(4,835	)		(3,079	)
Noninterest income
Equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries		(695	)		911			(1,819	)
Fees from subsidiaries		5,894			6,435			7,348
Gain on sale of assets, net		191			—			—
Other income		223			234			346
Total noninterest income		5,613			7,580			5,875
Noninterest expense
Compensation and employee benefits		7,134			8,358			11,179
Equipment		716			864			1,155
Occupancy and premises		742			728			966
Professional services		2,083			1,039			1,431
Write down and losses on assets		21			247			113
Other		1,593			3,076			2,413
Total noninterest expense		12,289			14,312			17,257
Loss before income taxes		(14,016	)		(11,567	)		(14,461	)
Income tax benefit		(245	)		(2,289	)		(2,800	)
Net loss	$	(13,771	)	$	(9,278	)	$	(11,661	)

105

Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(13,771	)	$	(9,278	)	$	(11,661	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		695			(911	)		(721	)
Depreciation and amortization		427			521			614
Write down and losses on assets		21			247			113
Gain on sale of assets		(191	)		—			—
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable and other assets		1,875			(3,588	)		224
Increase in interest payable junior subordinated debentures		8,501			7,688			6,581
Decrease in other interest payable and other liabilities		(624	)		(931	)		(1,200	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(3,067	)		(6,252	)		(6,050	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(537	)		718			2,807
Dividends received from subsidiaries		—			1,575			2,650
Capital expenditures		(101	)		(124	)		(465	)
Decrease in investment in subsidiaries held for disposal		(1,226	)		351			7,268
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed property		—			637			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(1,864	)		3,157			12,260
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Reduction in receivable from the sale of stock		30			—			—
Net cash used in financing activities		30			—			—
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(4,901	)		(3,095	)		6,210
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		30,648			33,743			27,533
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	25,747		$	30,648		$	33,743

106

Note 24-Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information (Unaudited)

	First Quarter			Second Quarter			Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter			TOTAL
	(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
2007
Total interest income	$	15,403		$	15,773		$	15,688		$	15,830		$	62,694
Total interest expense		9,851			9,784			10,018			10,414			40,067
Net interest income		5,552			5,989			5,670			5,416			22,627
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		694			(681	)		5,834			566			6,413
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses		4,858			6,670			(164	)		4,850			16,214
Other noninterest income		1,795			602			227			426			3,050
Other noninterest expense		8,879			8,700			8,742			8,151			34,472
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(2,226	)		(1,428	)		(8,679	)		(2,875	)		(15,208	)
Income tax expense		3			—			—			—			3
Loss from continuing operations		(2,229	)		(1,428	)		(8,679	)		(2,875	)		(15,211	)
Discontinued operations:
Pretax income (loss) from discontinued operations		417			(14	)		8			6			417
Tax effect for discontinued operations		67			(1,230	)		70			70			(1,023	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		350			1,216			(62	)		(64	)		1,440
Net loss	$	(1,879	)	$	(212	)	$	(8,741	)	$	(2,939	)	$	(13,771	)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.47	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.83	)
Discontinued operations		0.02			0.07			(0.01	)		(0.00	)		0.08
Net Loss	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.75	)
Diluted
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.47	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.83	)
Discontinued operations		0.02			0.07			(0.01	)		(0.00	)		0.08
Net loss	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.75	)
2006
Total interest income	$	14,367		$	15,017		$	15,952		$	16,173		$	61,509
Total interest expense		8,847			9,346			9,975			10,074			38,242
Net interest income		5,520			5,671			5,977			6,099			23,267
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		(2,422	)		137			(1,079	)		(1,020	)		(4,384	)
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		7,942			5,534			7,056			7,119			27,651
Other noninterest income		495			1,336			1,583			1,128			4,542
Other noninterest expense		12,549			10,643			9,401			9,538			42,131
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(4,112	)		(3,773	)		(762	)		(1,291	)		(9,938	)
Income tax (benefit) expense		(188	)		(43	)		53			79			(99	)
Loss from continuing operations		(3,924	)		(3,730	)		(815	)		(1,370	)		(9,839	)
Discontinued operations:
Pretax income from discontinued operations		254			33			332			41			660
Tax effect for discontinued operations		188			43			(53	)		(79	)		99
Net income from discontinued operations		66			(10	)		385			120			561
Net loss	$	(3,858	)	$	(3,740	)	$	(430	)	$	(1,250	)	$	(9,278	)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.54	)
Discontinued operations		0.00			(0.00	)		0.02			0.01			0.03
Net Loss	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.51	)
Diluted
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.54	)
Discontinued operations		0.00			0.00			0.02			0.01			0.03
Net loss	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.51	)

107

Note 25-Subsequent Events

Regulatory Orders and Agreements

The Marine Bank Memoranda was terminated in January 2008, after which none of the subsidiary banks were party to any formal or informal regulatory agreement or order.

Late Filing of Tax Returns

CIB Marine did not file all required federal and state tax returns for calendar years 2004, 2005 and 2006 by the required due dates. Although CIB Marine did not report taxable income during these periods, penalties and interest may still be assessed by the Internal Revenue Service and/or applicable state departments of revenue. As of the first quarter of 2008, CIB Marine was current with all its federal and state tax return filings.

Municipal Bond Insurer Rating Downgrades

Since December 31, 2007, due to economic conditions, several nationally recognized rating agencies downgraded the credit ratings of several of the investment grade credit insuring companies. Several of the downgraded companies insure municipal obligation investments owned by CIB Marine. The municipal obligations have a par value of $16.5 million and a fair value of $16.4 million as of December 31, 2007. CIB Marine has not recognized any impairment on these effected municipal obligations and the securities are still considered investment grade quality as rated by the rating agencies.

Loan Pool Purchase

Due to a general decline in economic conditions during 2008, CIB Marine recognized a $0.5 million provision during the first quarter of 2008 related to the purchased home equity loan pools.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no disagreements or reportable events of the nature required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 304 (b) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

CIB Marine maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by CIB Marine in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Disclosure controls include components of internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

CIB Marine’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2007. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2007.

(b) CIB Marine’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of CIB Marine, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of CIB Marine are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of CIB Marine; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of CIB Marine’s assets that could have a material effect on interim or annual consolidated financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

108

CIB Marine’s management, with the participation of its CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of CIB Marine’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Controls-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that CIB Marine’s internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2007.

This annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation of CIB Marine’s public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by CIB Marine’s registered accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit CIB Marine to provide only management’s report in this annual report on Form 10-K.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in CIB Marine’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect CIB Marine’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information in CIB Marine’s definitive Proxy Statement prepared for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerning directors of the Corporation under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Information Regarding Nominees and Directors”, and information concerning Section 16(a) compliance under the caption “Section 16 - Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding executive officers is included as a supplemental item at the end of Item 4 of Part I of the Form 10-K.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information in CIB Marine’s definitive Proxy Statement prepared for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerning this item under the caption “Executive and Director Compensation,” is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information in CIB Marine’s definitive Proxy Statement prepared for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerning this item under the caption “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” is incorporated herein by reference.

109

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2007, regarding shares outstanding and available for issuance under CIB Marine’s existing equity compensation plans.

Equity Compensation Plan Information(1)
Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		1,298,027	$	6.87		337,703
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		1,298,027	$	6.87		337,703

(1)See Item 8, Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Stock-Based Compensation and Note 19-Stock Option Plans in Part II of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our stock-based compensation plans.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information in CIB Marine’s definitive Proxy Statement prepared for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerning this item under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Director Independence,” is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information in the Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement, prepared for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerning this item under the caption “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The following financial statements of CIB Marine are filed as a part of this document under Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

·   Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

·   Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.

·   Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.

·   Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

·   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

·   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules have been omitted as the required information is either inapplicable or included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(a)(3) Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Exhibit
3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to CIB Marine’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2005).

3.2 Bylaws of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to CIB Marine’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2005).

110

*10.1	CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to CIB Marine’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003).
*10.2	First Amendment to the CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to CIB Marine’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2005).
*10.3	CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Key Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of CIB Marine’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2005).
*10.4	CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Key Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (accelerated vesting upon sale of subsidiary bank) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of CIB Marine’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2005).
*10.5	CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Key Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (accelerated vesting upon sale of subsidiary bank) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of CIB Marine’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 16, 2006).
*10.6	CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. Severance Pay Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of CIB Marine’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2005).
*10.7	Employment Agreement between John P. Hickey, Jr. and CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to CIB Marine’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 23, 2007).
10.8	Written Agreement between CIB Marine and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 of CIB Marine’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 1, 2004).
10.9	Agreement between Edwin J. Depenbrok and CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to CIB Marine’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7, 2008)
14.1	Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 2, 2004).
21	Subsidiaries of CIB Marine
23.1	Consent of KPMG LLP
31.1	Certification of John P. Hickey, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
31.2	Certification of Edwin J. Depenbrok, Chief Financial Officer, under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
32.1	Certification of John P. Hickey, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Edwin J. Depenbrok, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, CIB Marine is not filing certain documents. CIB Marine agrees to furnish a copy of each such document upon the request of the Commission.

* Indicates management contracts and compensatory arrangements required to be filed pursuant to Item 15(b) of this Annual Report.

111

(b) Exhibits

See Item 15(a)(3)

(c) Financial Statement Schedules

See Item 15(a)(2)

112

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC. (registrant)
Date: April 1, 2008	By:	/s/ JOHN P. HICKEY, Jr.
		John P. Hickey, Jr.
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ JOHN P. HICKEY, Jr.  John P. Hickey, Jr.	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	April 1, 2008
/s/ EDWIN J. DEPENBROK Edwin J. Depenbrok	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	April 1, 2008
/s/ NORMAN E. BAKER Norman E. Baker	Director	April 1, 2008
/s/ STANLEY J. CALDERON Stanley J. Calderon	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director	April 1, 2008
/s/ W. SCOTT BLAKE Scott Blake	Director	April 1, 2008
/s/ STEVEN C. HILLARD Steve Hillard	Director	April 1, 2008
/s/ GARY L. LONGMAN Gary Longman	Director	April 1, 2008
/s/ DONALD M. TRILLING Donald M. Trilling	Director	April 1, 2008
/s/ HOWARD E. ZIMMERMAN Howard E. Zimmerman	Director	April 1, 2008

113

EX-21

Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF CIB MARINE

DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES	INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES	STATE/JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.		Wisconsin Corporation
Central Illinois Bank		Illinois Commercial Bank
CIB Construction, LLC		Illinois Limited Liability Company
	Canron Corporation (1)	Michigan Corporation
Everett Tech, Inc. f/k/a MICR, Inc.(2)		Illinois Corporation
First Ozaukee Capital Corp.		Wisconsin Corporation
	Marine Bank	Wisconsin Commercial Bank
	Marine Investment Corporation	Nevada Subsidiary
CIB Marine Information Services, Inc.		Illinois Corporation
Mortgage Services, Inc.		Illinois Corporation
CIB Marine Capital Trust I		Delaware Business Trust
CIB Statutory Trust III		Connecticut Statutory Trust
CIB Statutory Trust IV		Connecticut Statutory Trust
CIB Statutory Trust V		Delaware Business Trust
Citrus Financial Services, Inc.		Florida Corporation
	Citrus Bank, NA	National Banking Association
CIB Marine Capital, LLC(3)		Wisconsin Limited Liability Company

(1) CIB Construction owns 84% of the outstanding stock of Canron which filed for dissolution in December, 2006.

(2) Dissolved on January 8, 2008.

(3) During 2003, CIB Marine ceased to offer new loans through CIB Marine Capital and began winding down its affairs, including the sale and collection of outstanding loans.

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 338-85173, No. 333-72949 and No. 333-87268) on Form S-8 of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 31, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2007, annual report on Form 10-K of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" on January 1, 2007.

/s/ KPMG LLP

March 31, 2008

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John P. Hickey, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 1, 2008	By:	/s/ John P. Hickey, Jr.
		John P. Hickey, Jr.
		President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Edwin J. Depenbrok, Chief Financial Officer, of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 1, 2008	By:	/s/ Edwin J. Depenbrok
		Edwin J. Depenbrok
		Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Hickey, Jr. as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 1, 2008	By:	/s/ John P. Hickey, Jr.
		John P. Hickey, Jr.
		President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edwin J. Depenbrok, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 1, 2008	By:	/s/ Edwin J. Depenbrok
		Edwin J. Depenbrok
		Chief Financial Officer