10-K 1 copt1231201210k.htm 10-K COPT 12.31.2012 10K


 
 
 
 
 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K 
(Mark one)
T
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
 
to
 
           
Commission file number 1-14023
Corporate Office Properties Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
 
23-2947217
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)
6711 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 300, Columbia, MD
21046
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (443) 285-5400
________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
(Title of Each Class)                            (Name of Exchange on Which Registered)
(Title of Each Class)
 
(Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value
 
New York Stock Exchange
Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value
 
New York Stock Exchange
Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value
 
New York Stock Exchange
Series L Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value
 
New York Stock Exchange
            
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ý Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. oYes ý No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý Yes   o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ý Yes   o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer o
 
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company o
 
 
 
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) o Yes   ý No
 
The aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.7 billion, as calculated using the closing price of the common shares of beneficial interest on the New York Stock Exchange and our outstanding shares as of June 29, 2012. For purposes of calculating this amount only, affiliates are defined as Trustees, executive owners and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the registrant's outstanding common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value. At January 28, 2013, 81,106,909 of the registrant’s common shares of beneficial interest were outstanding.

Portions of the annual shareholders’ report of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2012 are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II of this Form 10-K and portions of the proxy statement of the registrant for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
 




Table of Contents
 
Form 10-K

 
 
PAGE
 
 
 

4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
53 
54 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
55 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


2


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking” statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about future events and financial trends affecting the financial condition and operations of our business. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “plan” or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which we cannot predict with accuracy and some of which we might not even anticipate. Although we believe that the expectations, estimates and projections reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions at the time made, we can give no assurance that these expectations, estimates and projections will be achieved. Future events and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that may affect these expectations, estimates and projections include, but are not limited to:
•
general economic and business conditions, which will, among other things, affect office property and data center demand and rents, tenant creditworthiness, interest rates, financing availability and property values;
•
adverse changes in the real estate markets, including, among other things, increased competition with other companies;
•
governmental actions and initiatives, including risks associated with the impact of a government shutdown or budgetary reductions or impasses, such as a reduction in rental revenues, non-renewal of leases and/or a curtailment of demand for additional space by our strategic customers;
•
our ability to borrow on favorable terms;
•
risks of real estate acquisition and development activities, including, among other things, risks that development projects may not be completed on schedule, that tenants may not take occupancy or pay rent or that development or operating costs may be greater than anticipated;
•
our ability to sell properties included in our Strategic Reallocation Plan;
•
risks of investing through joint venture structures, including risks that our joint venture partners may not fulfill their financial obligations as investors or may take actions that are inconsistent with our objectives;
•
changes in our plans for properties or views of market economic conditions or failure to obtain development rights, either of which could result in recognition of significant impairment losses;
•
our ability to satisfy and operate effectively under Federal income tax rules relating to real estate investment trusts and partnerships;
•
the dilutive effects of issuing additional common shares;
•
our ability to achieve projected results; and
•
environmental requirements.

For further information on factors that could affect the company and the statements contained herein, you should refer to the section below entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” We undertake no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements.


3


PART I
Item 1. Business

OUR COMPANY
General. We are an office real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that focuses primarily on serving the specialized requirements of United States Government agencies and defense contractors, most of whom are engaged in defense information technology and national security related activities. We generally acquire, develop, manage and lease office and data center properties concentrated in large office parks located near knowledge-based government demand drivers and/or in targeted markets or submarkets in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region. As of December 31, 2012, our investments in real estate included the following:
•
208 operating office properties totaling 18.8 million square feet that were 88% occupied;
•
13 office properties under construction or redevelopment, or for which we were contractually committed to construct, that we estimate will total approximately 1.7 million square feet upon completion, including two partially operational properties included above;
•
land held or under pre-construction totaling 1,694 acres (including 561 acres controlled but not owned) that we believe are potentially developable into approximately 19.3 million square feet; and
•
a partially operational, wholesale data center which upon completion and stabilization is expected to have a critical load of 18 megawatts.

We conduct almost all of our operations through our operating partnership, Corporate Office Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership, of which we are the managing general partner. The Operating Partnership owns real estate both directly and through subsidiary partnerships and limited liability companies (“LLCs”). The Operating Partnership also owns subsidiaries that provide real estate services such as property management, construction and development services primarily for our properties but also for third parties.

Interests in our Operating Partnership are in the form of common and preferred units. As of December 31, 2012, we owned 95% of the outstanding common units and 97% of the outstanding preferred units in our Operating Partnership. The remaining common and preferred units in our Operating Partnership were owned by third parties, which included certain members of our Board of Trustees.
We believe that we are organized and have operated in a manner that satisfies the requirements for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner. Provided we continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to Federal income tax on our taxable income that is distributed to our shareholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its annual taxable income (excluding net capital gains).
Our executive offices are located at 6711 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 300, Columbia, Maryland 21046 and our telephone number is (443) 285-5400.

Our Internet address is www.copt.com. We make available on our Internet website free of charge our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably possible after we file such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, we have made available on our Internet website under the heading “Corporate Governance” the charters for our Board of Trustees' Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, Compensation and Investment Committees, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics for Financial Officers. We intend to make available on our website any future amendments or waivers to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics for Financial Officers within four business days after any such amendments or waivers. The information on our Internet site is not part of this report.

The SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. This Internet website can be accessed at www.sec.gov. The public may also read and copy paper filings that we have made with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.


4


Significant 2012 Developments
During 2012, we:

•
disposed of 35 operating properties totaling 2.3 million square feet and non-operating properties for aggregate transaction values totaling $313.6 million.  The $291 million in net proceeds from these sales were used primarily to pay down our Revolving Credit Facility;
•
approved a plan to dispose of our office properties and developable land in Greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania within the next four years because the properties no longer meet our strategic investment criteria;
•
acquired for $48.3 million a property in Herndon, Virginia totaling 202,000 square feet that was 100% leased;
•
placed into service an aggregate of 371,000 square feet in four newly constructed office properties;
•
issued 6.9 million Series L Cumulative Preferred Shares (the “Series L Preferred Shares”) at a price of $25.00 per share for net proceeds of $165.7 million after underwriting discounts but before offering expenses. These shares are nonvoting and redeemable for cash at $25.00 per share at our option on or after June 27, 2017. The net proceeds were used to pay down our Revolving Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes;
•
redeemed all of our Series G Preferred Shares of beneficial interest (the “Series G Preferred Shares”) at a price of $25.00 per share, or $55.0 million in the aggregate, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon through the date of redemption;
•
completed a public offering of 8.6 million common shares of beneficial interest (“common shares”) at a price of $24.75 per share for net proceeds of $204.9 million after underwriter discounts but before offering expenses;
•
established an at-the-market (“ATM”) stock offering program under which we may, from time to time, offer and sell common shares in “at the market” stock offerings having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $150.0 million;
•
entered into unsecured term loan agreements, under which we borrowed $370 million in the aggregate.  The net proceeds from these borrowings were used to pay down our Revolving Credit Facility;
•
exercised our right to reduce the lenders’ aggregate commitment under our unsecured revolving credit facility from $1.0 billion to $800 million, with the ability, subject to certain conditions, for us to increase the lenders’ aggregate commitment to $1.3 billion;
•
finished the period with our portfolio of office properties 87.8% occupied and our Same Office Properties 89.1% occupied; and
•
completed the transition of Roger A. Waesche, Jr. as our President and Chief Executive Officer following the retirement of Randall M. Griffin effective March 31, 2012.

Business and Growth Strategies

Our primary objectives are to achieve sustainable long-term growth in results of operations and to maximize long-term shareholder value. This section sets forth key components of our business and growth strategies that we have in place to support these objectives.

Business Strategies

Customer Strategy: We focus on serving the specialized requirements of United States Government agencies and defense contractors, most of whom are engaged in defense information technology and national security related activities. These tenants’ missions generally pertain more to knowledge-based activities (such as cyber security, research and development and other highly technical defense and security areas) than to force structure (troops) and weapon system production. A high percentage of our revenue is concentrated in office and data center properties supporting this strategy, and we expect to further increase this concentration level through our:

•
properties’ (existing buildings and land held for future development) proximity to defense installations and other knowledge-based government demand drivers, and our willingness to expand to new locations with similar proximities;
•
strong relationships with tenants engaged in knowledge-based defense and security activities;
•
depth of collective team knowledge, experience and capabilities in developing, operating and securing office properties and single user data centers that meet the United States Government’s Force Protection requirements;
•
record for providing service that exceeds customer expectations both in terms of the quality of the space we provide and our level of responsiveness to their needs. We have won the CEL & Associates, Inc. award for quality service and tenant satisfaction among nationwide office operators in the large owner category every year since 2004. We believe that operating with such an emphasis on service enables us to be the landlord of choice with high quality customers and contributes to high levels of customer loyalty and retention; and
•
continued future investment focused on properties for United States Government agencies and defense contractors.


5


Market Strategy: In order to support our customer strategy, we focus on owning properties located near defense installations and other knowledge-based government demand drivers. We also focus on owning properties in targeted markets or submarkets in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region with strong growth attributes. The growth attributes we look for in selecting these markets or submarkets include, among others: (1) proximity to large demand drivers; (2) strong demographics; (3) attractiveness to high quality tenants; (4) continued potential for growth and stability in economic down cycles; and (5) future acquisition and development opportunities. We typically focus on owning and operating office properties in large business parks located outside of central business districts. We believe that such parks generally attract long-term, high-quality tenants seeking to attract and retain quality work forces because they are typically situated along major transportation routes with easy access to support services, amenities and residential communities.

Capital Strategy: Our capital strategy is aimed at maintaining a flexible capital structure in order to facilitate growth and performance in the face of differing market conditions in the most cost-effective manner by:

•
using debt comprised primarily of fixed-rate debt (including the effect of interest rate swaps) from banks and institutional lenders along with debt available from public debt markets, such as our exchangeable senior notes;
•
using equity raised through issuances of common and preferred shares of beneficial interest, issuances of common and preferred units in our Operating Partnership and, to a lesser extent, joint venture structures for certain investments;
•
managing our debt by monitoring, among other things: (1) our debt levels relative to our overall capital structure; (2) the relationship of certain measures of earnings to certain financing cost requirements (commonly referred to as coverage ratios); (3) the relationship of our variable-rate debt to our total debt; and (4) the timing of debt maturities to ensure that maturities in any year do not exceed levels that we believe we can refinance;
•
using proceeds from sales under our disposition strategy to fund our investment activities, including our development pipeline, and to reduce overall debt; and
•
continuously evaluating the ability of our capital resources to accommodate our plans for future growth.

Growth Strategies

Property Development and Acquisition Strategy: We pursue property development and acquisition opportunities for properties that fit our customer and market strategies. As a result, the focus of our development and acquisition activities includes properties that are either: (1) located near defense installations and other knowledge-based government demand drivers; or (2) located in markets or submarkets in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region that we believe meet the criteria set forth above in our market strategy. We may also develop or acquire properties that do not align with our customer or market strategies but which we believe provide opportunity for favorable returns on investment given the associated risks.

We pursue development activities as market conditions and leasing opportunities support favorable risk-adjusted returns on investment. We typically seek to make acquisitions at attractive yields and below replacement cost, or that otherwise meet our strategic objectives. We also seek to increase operating cash flow of certain acquisitions by repositioning the properties and capitalizing on existing below market leases and expansion opportunities.

Disposition Strategy: We seek to dispose of properties and other investments that no longer meet our strategic objectives in order to remain aligned with such objectives, maximize our return on invested capital and be better positioned for long term growth.

Internal Growth Strategy: We aggressively manage our portfolio to maximize the operating value and performance of each property through: (1) proactive property management and leasing; (2) achieving operating efficiencies through increasing economies of scale and, where possible, aggregating vendor contracts to achieve volume pricing discounts; and (3) renewing tenant leases and re-tenanting at increased rents where market conditions permit. We also aim to develop and operate our properties in a manner that minimizes adverse impact on the environment by: (1) constructing new buildings designed to use resources with a higher level of efficiency and lower impact on human health and the environment during their life cycles than conventional buildings through our participation in the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED”) program; (2) retrofitting select existing office properties to operate more efficiently; and (3) registering our property portfolio in Energy Star, a joint program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy that focuses on protecting the environment through energy efficient products and practices.

Industry Segments
We operate in two primary industries: commercial office properties and our wholesale data center. We classify our properties containing data center space as commercial office real estate when tenants significantly fund the data center

6


infrastructure costs. At December 31, 2012, our commercial office real estate operations were in geographical segments, as set forth below:
•
Baltimore/Washington Corridor (generally defined as the Maryland counties of Howard and Anne Arundel);
•
Northern Virginia (defined as Fairfax County, Virginia);
•
San Antonio, Texas;
•
Washington, DC - Capitol Riverfront;
•
St. Mary’s & King George Counties (in Maryland and Virginia, respectively);
•
Greater Baltimore, Maryland (generally defined as the Maryland counties of Baltimore and Harford and Baltimore City);
•
Suburban Maryland (defined as the Maryland counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s);
•
Colorado Springs, Colorado; and
•
Greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania).

As of December 31, 2012, 173 of our office properties, or 82% of our square feet in operations, were located in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region, which includes all the segments set forth above except for San Antonio, Colorado Springs and Greater Philadelphia. Our wholesale data center, which is comprised of one property in Manassas, Virginia, is reported as a separate segment.
For information relating to our segments, you should refer to Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements, which is included in a separate section at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1.
Employees
As of December 31, 2012, we had 384 employees, none of whom were parties to collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Competition
The commercial real estate market is highly competitive. Numerous commercial properties compete with our properties for tenants. Some of the properties competing with ours may be newer or in more desirable locations, or the competing properties’ owners may be willing to accept lower rents than are acceptable to us. We also compete with our own tenants, many of whom have the right to sublease their space. The competitive environment for leasing is affected considerably by a number of factors including, among other things, changes in economic factors and supply of and demand for space. These factors may make it difficult for us to lease existing vacant space and space associated with future lease expirations at rental rates that are sufficient to meeting our short-term capital needs.
We compete for the acquisition of commercial properties with many entities, including other publicly-traded commercial REITs. Many of our competitors for such acquisitions have substantially greater financial resources than ours. In addition, our competitors may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. If our competitors prevent us from buying properties that we have targeted for acquisition, we may not be able to meet our property acquisition goals.
We also compete with many entities, including other publicly-traded commercial REITs, for capital. This competition could adversely affect our ability to raise capital we may need to fulfill our capital strategy.
In addition, we also compete with other sellers of commercial properties for a limited number of buyers of properties. This competition could adversely affect our ability to complete property dispositions under existing or future disposition plans.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Set forth below are risks and uncertainties relating to our business and the ownership of our securities. You should carefully consider each of these risks and uncertainties and all of the information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and its Exhibits, including our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are included in a separate section at the end of this report beginning on page F-1.

Our performance and value are subject to risks associated with our properties and with the real estate industry. Real estate investments are subject to various risks and fluctuations in value and demand, many of which are beyond our control. Our economic performance and the value of our real estate assets may decline due to conditions in the general economy and the real estate business which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of

7


operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders. These conditions include, but are not limited to:

•
downturns in national, regional and local economic environments, including increases in the unemployment rate and inflation or deflation;
•
competition from other properties;
•
deteriorating local real estate market conditions, such as oversupply, reduction in demand and decreasing rental rates;
•
declining real estate valuations;
•
increasing vacancies and the need to periodically repair, renovate and re-lease space;
•
adverse developments concerning our tenants, which could affect our ability to collect rents and execute lease renewals;
•
government actions and initiatives, including risks associated with the impact of government shutdowns and budgetary reductions or impasses, such as a reduction of rental revenues, non-renewal of leases and/or a curtailment of demand for additional space by our strategic customers;
•
increasing operating costs, including insurance expenses, utilities, real estate taxes and other expenses, much of which we may not be able to pass through to tenants;
•
increasing interest rates and unavailability of financing on acceptable terms or at all;
•
trends in office real estate that may adversely affect future demand, including telecommuting and flexible workplaces that increase the population density per square foot;
•
adverse changes in taxation or zoning laws;
•
potential inability to secure adequate insurance;
•
adverse consequences resulting from civil disturbances, natural disasters, terrorist acts or acts of war; and
•
potential liability under environmental or other laws or regulations.

We may suffer adverse consequences as a result of adverse economic conditions. Our business may be affected by adverse economic conditions in the United States economy or real estate industry as a whole or by the local economic conditions in the markets in which our properties are located, including the impact of high unemployment and constrained credit. Adverse economic conditions could increase the likelihood of tenants encountering financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, insolvency or general downturn of business, and as a result could increase the likelihood of tenants defaulting in their lease obligations to us. Such conditions also could increase the likelihood of our being unsuccessful in renewing tenants, renewing tenants on terms less favorable to us or being unable to lease newly constructed properties. In addition, such conditions could increase the level of risk that we may not be able to obtain new financing for development activities, acquisitions, refinancing of existing debt or other capital requirements at reasonable terms, if at all. As a result, adverse economic conditions could collectively have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We may suffer adverse consequences as a result of our reliance on rental revenues for our income. We earn revenue from renting our properties. Our operating costs do not necessarily fluctuate in relation to changes in our rental revenue. This means that our costs will not necessarily decline and may increase even if our revenues decline.

For new tenants or upon lease expiration for existing tenants, we generally must make improvements and pay other leasing costs for which we may not receive increased rents. We also make building-related capital improvements for which tenants may not reimburse us.

If our properties do not generate revenue sufficient to meet our operating expenses and capital costs, we may have to borrow additional amounts to cover these costs. In such circumstances, we would likely have lower profits or possibly incur losses. We may also find in such circumstances that we are unable to borrow to cover such costs, in which case our operations could be adversely affected. Moreover, there may be less or no cash available for distributions to our shareholders.

In addition, the competitive environment for leasing is affected considerably by a number of factors including, among other things, changes due to economic factors such as supply and demand. These factors may make it difficult for us to lease existing vacant space and space associated with future lease expirations at rental rates that are sufficient to meet our short-term capital needs.

We rely on the ability of our tenants to pay rent and would be harmed by their inability to do so. Our performance depends on the ability of our tenants to fulfill their lease obligations by paying their rental payments in a timely manner. If one or more of our major tenants, or a number of our smaller tenants, were to experience financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, insolvency, government shutdown, or general downturn of business, there could be an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.


8


We may be adversely affected by developments concerning some of our major tenants and sector concentrations, including shutdowns of the United States Government and actual, or potential, reductions in government spending targeting United States Government agencies and defense contractors engaged in knowledge-based activities. As of December 31, 2012, our 20 largest tenants accounted for 64.5% of the total annualized rental revenue of our office properties, and the four largest of these tenants accounted for 63.4% of that portion. We computed the annualized rental revenue by multiplying by 12 the sum of monthly contractual base rents and estimated monthly expense reimbursements under active leases in our portfolio of office properties as of December 31, 2012. Information regarding our four largest tenants is set forth below:
Tenant
 

Annualized
Rental Revenue at December 31, 2012
 
Percentage of Total
Annualized Rental
Revenue of
Office Properties
 


Number
of Leases
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
United States of America
 
$
111,745

 
24.2%
 
63
Northrop Grumman Corporation (1)
 
29,061

 
6.3%
 
12
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
 
25,598

 
5.5%
 
10
Computer Sciences Corporation (1)
 
22,321

 
4.8%
 
7

(1)
Includes affiliated organizations and agencies and predecessor companies.

Most of our leases with the United States Government provide for a series of one-year terms or provide for early termination rights. The United States Government may terminate its leases if, among other reasons, the United States Congress fails to provide funding. If any of our four largest tenants fail to make rental payments to us, including as a result of a government shutdown, or if the United States Government elects to terminate some or all of its leases and the space cannot be re-leased on satisfactory terms, there would be an adverse effect on our financial performance and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

As of December 31, 2012, 70.0% of the total annualized rental revenue of our office properties held for long-term investment was from properties located near defense installations and other knowledge-based government demand drivers, or that were otherwise at least 50% occupied by United States Government agencies or defense contractors. We expect to further increase our reliance on United States Government agencies and defense contractors, most of whom are engaged in knowledge-based defense and security activities, for revenue. A reduction in government spending targeting these activities could affect the ability of these tenants to fulfill lease obligations, decrease the likelihood that these tenants will renew their leases or enter into new leases and limit our future growth from these sectors. Moreover, uncertainty regarding the potential for future reduction in government spending targeting these activities could also decrease or delay leasing activity from tenants engaged in these activities. The Budget Control Act passed in 2011, which imposed caps on the Federal budget in order to achieve targeted spending levels over the 2013-2021 fiscal years, has fueled further uncertainty regarding future government spending reductions. A reduction in government spending targeting knowledge-based defense and security activities and/or uncertainty regarding the potential for future spending reductions could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
 
We may be unable to successfully execute plans to dispose of properties. In 2011, we implemented our Strategic Reallocation Plan to dispose of office properties and land that are no longer closely aligned with our strategy. In 2012, our Board of Trustees also approved a plan by management to shorten the holding period for office properties and developable land in Greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania because the properties no longer meet our strategic investment criteria. Our failure to successfully execute these and other future disposition plans could adversely affect our ability to effectively execute our business strategy, which in turn could affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to shareholders.

We may suffer adverse consequences due to our inexperience in developing, managing and leasing wholesale data centers. We have significant experience in developing, managing and leasing single user data center space. However, we do not have the same depth and length of experience in relation to wholesale data centers, having acquired our wholesale data center in 2010 and having made limited progress leasing that center through December 31, 2012. This may increase the likelihood of us being unsuccessful in executing our plans with respect to our existing wholesale data center or any such centers that we may acquire or develop in the future. If we are unsuccessful in executing our wholesale data center plans, it could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.


9


Most of our properties are geographically concentrated in the Mid-Atlantic region, particularly in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region, or in particular office parks. We may suffer economic harm in the event of a decline in the real estate market or general economic conditions in those regions or parks. Most of our properties are located in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States and, as of December 31, 2012, our properties located in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region accounted for a combined 83.6% of our total annualized rental revenue from office properties. Our properties are also often concentrated in office parks in which we own most of the properties. Consequently, we do not have a broad geographic distribution of our properties. As a result, a decline in the real estate market or general economic conditions in the Mid-Atlantic region, the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region or the office parks in which our properties are located could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We would suffer economic harm if we were unable to renew our leases on favorable terms. When leases expire, our tenants may not renew or may renew on terms less favorable to us than the terms of their original leases. If a tenant vacates a property, we can expect to experience a vacancy for some period of time, as well as incur higher leasing costs than we would likely incur if a tenant renews. As a result, our financial performance and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected if we experience a high volume of tenant departures at the end of their lease terms.

We may be adversely affected by trends in the office real estate industry. Some businesses are rapidly evolving to increasingly permit employee telecommuting, flexible work schedules, open workplaces and teleconferencing. These practices enable businesses to reduce their space requirements. A continuation of the movement towards these practices could over time erode the overall demand for office space and, in turn, place downward pressure on occupancy, rental rates and property valuations, each of which could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We may encounter a decline in the value of our real estate. The value of our real estate could be adversely affected by general economic and market conditions connected to a specific property, a market or submarket, a broader economic region or the office real estate industry. Examples of such conditions include a broader economic recession, declining demand and decreases in market rental rates and/or market values of real estate assets. If our real estate assets decline in value, it could result in our recognition of impairment losses. Moreover, a decline in the value of our real estate could adversely affect the amount of borrowings available to us under credit facilities and other loans, which could, in turn, adversely affect our cash flows and financial condition.

We may not be able to compete successfully with other entities that operate in our industry. The commercial real estate market is highly competitive. We compete for the purchase of commercial property with many entities, including other publicly traded commercial REITs. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial resources than we do. If our competitors prevent us from buying properties that we target for acquisition, we may not be able to meet our property acquisition goals. Moreover, numerous commercial properties compete for tenants with our properties. Some of the properties competing with ours may be newer or in more desirable locations, or the competing properties’ owners may be willing to accept lower rates than are acceptable to us. Competition for property acquisitions, or for tenants for properties that we own, could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We are dependent on external sources of capital for future growth. Because we are a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income to our shareholders. Due to this requirement, we are not able to significantly fund our acquisition, construction and development activities using cash flow from operations. Therefore, our ability to fund these activities is dependent on our ability to access capital funded by third parties. Such capital could be in the form of new debt, equity issuances of common shares, preferred shares, common and preferred units in our Operating Partnership or joint venture funding. These capital sources may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Moreover, additional debt financing may substantially increase our leverage and subject us to covenants that restrict management’s flexibility in directing our operations, and additional equity offerings may result in substantial dilution of our shareholders’ interests. Our inability to obtain capital when needed could have a material adverse effect on our ability to expand our business and fund other cash requirements.

We use our Revolving Credit Facility to initially finance much of our investing and financing activities. We also use other credit facilities to fund a significant portion of our construction activities. Our lenders under these and other facilities could, for financial hardship or other reasons, fail to honor their commitments to fund our requests for borrowings under these facilities. In the event that one or more lenders under these facilities are not able or willing to fund a borrowing request, it would adversely affect our ability to access borrowing capacity under these facilities, which would in turn adversely affect our financial condition, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.


10


We may be unable to successfully execute our plans to acquire existing commercial real estate properties. We intend to acquire existing commercial real estate properties to the extent that suitable acquisitions can be made on advantageous terms. Acquisitions of commercial properties entail risks, such as the risks that we may not be in a position, or have the opportunity in the future, to make suitable property acquisitions on advantageous terms and/or that such acquisitions will fail to perform as expected. The failure of our acquisitions to perform as expected could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We may be exposed to unknown liabilities from acquired properties. We may acquire properties that are subject to liabilities in situations where we have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the prior owners or other third parties with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle or contest it, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow. Examples of unknown liabilities with respect to acquired properties include, but are not limited to:

•
liabilities for clean-up of disclosed or undisclosed environmental contamination;
•
claims by tenants, vendors or other persons dealing with the former owners of the properties;
•
liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business; and
•
claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.

We may suffer economic harm as a result of making unsuccessful acquisitions in new markets. We may pursue selective acquisitions of properties in regions where we have not previously owned properties. These acquisitions may entail risks in addition to those we face in other acquisitions where we are familiar with the regions, such as the risk that we do not correctly anticipate conditions or trends in a new market and are therefore not able to operate the acquired property profitably. If this occurs, it could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We may be unable to execute our plans to develop and construct additional properties. Although the majority of our investments are in currently leased properties, we also develop, construct and redevelop properties, including some that are not fully pre-leased. When we develop, construct and redevelop properties, we assume the risk that actual costs will exceed our budgets, that we will experience conditions which delay or preclude project completion and that projected leasing will not occur, any of which could adversely affect our financial performance, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, we generally do not obtain construction financing commitments until the development stage of a project is complete and construction is about to commence. We may find that we are unable to obtain financing needed to continue with the construction activities for such projects.

Our data centers may become obsolete. Data centers are much more expensive investments on a per square foot basis than office properties due to the level of infrastructure required to operate the centers. At the same time, technology, industry standards and service requirements for data centers are rapidly evolving and, as a result, the risk of investments we make in data centers becoming obsolete is higher than office properties. Our data centers may become obsolete due to the development of new systems to deliver power to, or eliminate heat from, the servers housed in the properties. Our data centers could also become obsolete from new server technology that requires less critical load and heat removal than our facilities are designed to provide. In addition, we may not be able to efficiently upgrade or change power and cooling systems to meet new demands or industry standards without incurring significant costs that we may not be able to pass on to our tenants. The obsolescence of our data centers could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

Certain of our properties containing data centers contain space not suitable for lease other than as data centers, which could make it difficult or impractical to reposition them for alternative use. Certain of our properties contain data center space, which is highly specialized space containing extensive electrical and mechanical systems that are designed uniquely to run and maintain banks of computer servers. As a result, in the event that we needed to reposition such data center space for another use, major renovations and expenditures could be required.

Real estate investments are illiquid, and we may not be able to sell our properties on a timely basis when we determine it is appropriate to do so. Real estate investments can be difficult to sell and convert to cash quickly, especially if market conditions are not favorable. Such illiquidity could limit our ability to quickly change our portfolio of properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the Internal Revenue Code imposes certain penalties on a REIT that sells property held for less than two years and limits the number of properties it can sell in a given year. In addition, for certain of our properties that we acquired by issuing units in our Operating Partnership, we are restricted by agreements with the sellers of the properties for a certain period of time from entering into transactions (such

11


as the sale or refinancing of the acquired property) that will result in a taxable gain to the sellers without the seller’s consent. Due to these factors, we may be unable to sell a property at an advantageous time.

We may suffer adverse effects as a result of the indebtedness that we carry and the terms and covenants that relate to this debt. Some of our properties are pledged by us to support repayment of indebtedness. In addition, we rely on borrowings to fund some or all of the costs of new property acquisitions, construction and development activities and other items. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of indebtedness that we may incur.

Payments of principal and interest on our debt may leave us with insufficient cash to operate our properties or pay distributions to our shareholders required to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We are also subject to the risks that:

•
we may not be able to refinance our existing indebtedness, or may refinance on terms that are less favorable to us than the terms of our existing indebtedness;
•
in the event of our default under the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, our Operating Partnership could be restricted from making cash distributions to us, which could result in reduced distributions to our shareholders or the need for us to incur additional debt to fund these distributions; and
•
if we are unable to pay our debt service on time or are unable to comply with restrictive financial covenants in certain of our debt, our lenders could foreclose on our properties securing such debt and, in some cases, other properties and assets that we own.

Some of our debt is cross-defaulted, which means that failure to pay interest or principal on the debt above a threshold value will create a default on certain of our other debt. In addition, some of our debt that is cross-defaulted also contains cross-collateralization provisions, which means that the collateral of the debt can also be used as collateral for certain of our other debt. Any foreclosure of our properties could result in loss of income and asset value that would negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders. In addition, if we are in default and the value of the properties securing a loan is less than the loan balance, we may be required to pay the resulting shortfall to the lender using other assets.
If short-term interest rates were to rise, our debt service payments on debt with variable interest rates would increase, which would lower our net income and could decrease our distributions to our shareholders. We use interest rate swap agreements from time to time to reduce the impact of changes in interest rates. Decreases in interest rates would result in increased interest payments due under interest rate swap agreements in place and, in the event we decided to unwind such agreements, could result in our recognizing a loss and remitting a payment.

We must refinance our debt in the future. As of December 31, 2012, our scheduled debt payments over the next five years, including maturities, were as of follows:
             Year
 
Amount (1)
 
 
(in thousands)
2013
 
$
121,129

2014
 
158,341

2015
 
795,802

2016
 
278,642

2017
 
551,388


(1)
Represents principal maturities only and therefore excludes net discounts of $8.6 million. Maturities include $17.5 million in 2013 and $411.1 million in 2015 that may each be extended for one year, subject to certain conditions.

Our operations likely will not generate enough cash flow to repay some or all of this debt without additional borrowings, equity issuances and/or property sales. If we cannot refinance our debt, extend the repayment dates, or raise additional equity prior to the dates when our debt matures, we would default on our existing debt, which would have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We have certain distribution requirements that reduce cash available for other business purposes. As a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income (excluding capital gains), which limits the amount of cash we can retain for other business purposes, including amounts to fund acquisitions and development activity. Also, it is possible that because of the differences between the time we actually receive revenue or pay expenses and the period during which we report those items for distribution purposes, we may have to borrow funds to meet the 90% distribution requirement.

12



We may be unable to continue to make shareholder distributions at expected levels. We expect to make regular quarterly cash distributions to our shareholders. However, our ability to make such distributions depends on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. Some of our loan agreements contain provisions that could restrict future distributions. Our ability to make distributions at expected levels will also be dependent, in part, on other matters, including, but not limited to:

•
continued property occupancy and timely receipt of rent obligations;
•
the amount of future capital expenditures and expenses relating to our properties;
•
the level of leasing activity and future rental rates;
•
the strength of the commercial real estate market;
•
our ability to compete;
•
our costs of compliance with environmental and other laws;
•
our corporate overhead levels;
•
our amount of uninsured losses; and
•
our decision to reinvest in operations rather than distribute available cash.

In addition, we can make distributions to the holders of our common shares only after we make preferential distributions to holders of our preferred shares.

Our ability to pay dividends may be limited, and we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to pay dividends regularly. Because we conduct substantially all of our operations through our Operating Partnership, our ability to pay dividends will depend almost entirely on payments and distributions received on our interests in our Operating Partnership, the payment of which depends in turn on our ability to operate profitably and generate cash flow from our operations. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to pay dividends on a regular quarterly basis in the future. Additionally, the terms of some of the debt to which our Operating Partnership is a party limit its ability to make some types of payments and other distributions to us. This in turn limits our ability to make some types of payments, including payment of dividends on common or preferred shares, unless we meet certain financial tests or such payments or dividends are required to maintain our qualification as a REIT. As a result, if we are unable to meet the applicable financial tests, we may not be able to pay dividends on our shares in one or more periods. Furthermore, any new shares of beneficial interest issued in capital-raising transactions will substantially increase the cash required to continue to pay cash dividends at current levels. Any common or preferred shares that may in the future be issued for financing acquisitions, share-based compensation arrangements or otherwise would have a similar effect.

We may incur additional indebtedness, which may harm our financial position and cash flow and potentially impact our ability to pay distributions to shareholders. Our governing documents do not limit us from incurring additional indebtedness and other liabilities. As of December 31, 2012, we had $2.0 billion of indebtedness outstanding. We may incur additional indebtedness and become more highly leveraged, which could harm our financial position and potentially limit our cash available to pay distributions to shareholders. As a result, we may not have sufficient funds remaining to make expected distributions to our shareholders if we incur additional indebtedness.

Our ability to pay distributions is further limited by the requirements of Maryland law. As a Maryland REIT, we may not under applicable Maryland law make a distribution if either of the following conditions exist after giving effect to the distribution: (1) the REIT would not be able to pay its debts as the debts become due in the usual course of business; or (2) the REIT's total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the REIT were dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution. Therefore, we may not be able to make expected distributions to our shareholders if either of the above described conditions exists after giving effect to the distribution.

We may issue additional common or preferred shares that dilute our shareholders’ interests. We may issue additional common shares and preferred shares without shareholder approval. Similarly, we may cause the Operating Partnership to issue its common or preferred units for contributions of cash or property without approval by the limited partners of the Operating Partnership or our shareholders. Our existing shareholders’ interests could be diluted if such additional issuances were to occur.

We may suffer economic harm as a result of the actions of our partners in real estate joint ventures and other investments. We invest in certain entities in which we are not the exclusive investor or principal decision maker. Investments in such entities may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present when a third party is not involved, including the possibility that the other parties to these investments might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Our partners in these entities may have economic, tax or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent

13


with our business interests or goals, and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. Such investments may also lead to impasses, for example, as to whether to sell a property, because neither we nor the other parties to these investments may have full control over the entity. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of the other parties to these investments. Each of these factors could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We may elect to make additional cash outlays to protect our investment in loans we make that are subordinate to other loans. We have made and may in the future make loans under which we have a secured interest in the ownership of a property that is subordinate to other loans on the property. If a default were to occur under the terms of any such loans with us or under the first mortgage loans related to the properties on such loans, we may, in order to protect our investment, elect to either: (1) purchase the other loan; or (2) foreclose on the ownership interest in the property and repay the first mortgage loan, either of which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We may be subject to possible environmental liabilities. We are subject to various Federal, state and local environmental laws, including air and water quality, hazardous or toxic substances and health and safety. These laws can impose liability on current and prior property owners or operators for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances released on a property, even if the property owner was not responsible for, or even aware of, the release of the hazardous substances. Costs resulting from environmental liability could be substantial. The presence of hazardous substances on our properties may also adversely affect occupancy and our ability to sell or borrow against those properties. In addition to the costs of government claims under environmental laws, private plaintiffs may bring claims for personal injury or other reasons. Additionally, various laws impose liability for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at the disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at such a facility is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability on an entity even if the facility was not owned or operated by the entity.

Although most of our properties have been subject to varying degrees of environmental assessment, many of these assessments are limited in scope and may not include or identify all potential environmental liabilities or risks associated with the property.  Identification of new compliance concerns or undiscovered areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, discovery of additional sites, human exposure to the contamination or changes in cleanup or compliance requirements could result in significant costs to us that could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

Terrorist attacks may adversely affect the value of our properties, our financial position and cash flows. We have significant investments in properties located in large metropolitan areas and near military installations. Future terrorist attacks could directly or indirectly damage our properties or cause losses that materially exceed our insurance coverage. After such an attack, tenants in these areas may choose to relocate their businesses to areas of the United States that may be perceived to be less likely targets of future terrorist activity, and fewer customers may choose to patronize businesses in these areas. This in turn would trigger a decrease in the demand for space in these areas, which could increase vacancies in our properties and force us to lease space on less favorable terms. As a result, the occurrence of terrorist attacks could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We may be subject to other possible liabilities that would adversely affect our financial position and cash flows. Our properties may be subject to other risks related to current or future laws, including laws benefiting disabled persons, state or local laws relating to zoning, construction, fire and life safety requirements and other matters. These laws may require significant property modifications in the future and could result in the levy of fines against us. In addition, although we believe that we adequately insure our properties, we are subject to the risk that our insurance may not cover all of the costs to restore a property that is damaged by a fire or other catastrophic events, including acts of war or, as mentioned above, terrorism. The occurrence of any of these events could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

We may be subject to increased costs of insurance and limitations on coverage, particularly regarding acts of terrorism. Our portfolio of properties is insured for losses under our property, casualty and umbrella insurance policies through September 30, 2013. These policies include coverage for acts of terrorism. Future changes in the insurance industry’s risk assessment approach and pricing structure may increase the cost of insuring our properties and decrease the scope of insurance coverage, either of which could adversely affect our financial position and operating results. Most of our loan agreements contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs, or at all, in the future. In addition, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could

14


adversely affect our ability to finance and/or refinance our properties and execute our growth strategies, which, in turn, would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

Our business could be adversely affected by a negative audit by the United States Government. Agencies of the United States, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency and various agency Inspectors General, routinely audit and investigate government contractors. These agencies review a contractor’s performance under its contracts, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards. The United States Government also reviews the adequacy of, and a contractor’s compliance with, its internal control systems and policies. Any costs found to be misclassified may be subject to repayment. If an audit or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or prohibition from doing business with the United States Government. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against us.

Our business could be adversely affected by security breaches through cyber attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise. We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons inside our organization or persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our information technology networks and related systems. Our information technology networks and related systems are essential to our business operations. Despite our activities to maintain the security and integrity of our networks and related systems, there can be no absolute assurance that these activities will be effective. A security breach involving our networks and related systems could disrupt out operations in numerous ways that could ultimately have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

Our ownership limits are important factors. Our Declaration of Trust limits ownership of our common shares by any single shareholder to 9.8% of the number of the outstanding common shares or 9.8% of the value of the outstanding common shares, whichever is more restrictive. Our Declaration of Trust also limits ownership by any single shareholder of our common and preferred shares in the aggregate to 9.8% of the aggregate value of the outstanding common and preferred shares. We call these restrictions the “Ownership Limit.” Our Declaration of Trust allows our Board of Trustees to exempt shareholders from the Ownership Limit. The Ownership Limit and the restrictions on ownership of our common shares may delay or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common shares or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.

Our Declaration of Trust includes other provisions that may prevent or delay a change of control. Subject to the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, our Board of Trustees has the authority, without shareholder approval, to issue additional securities on terms that could delay or prevent a change in control. In addition, our Board of Trustees has the authority to reclassify any of our unissued common shares into preferred shares. Our Board of Trustees may issue preferred shares with such preferences, rights, powers and restrictions as our Board of Trustees may determine, which could also delay or prevent a change in control.

The Maryland business statutes impose potential restrictions that may discourage a change of control of our company. Various Maryland laws may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire us, even if the acquisition would be advantageous to shareholders. Resolutions adopted by our Board of Trustees and/or provisions of our bylaws exempt us from such laws, but our Board of Trustees can alter its resolutions or change our bylaws at any time to make these provisions applicable to us.

Our failure to qualify as a REIT would have adverse tax consequences, which would substantially reduce funds available to make distributions to our shareholders. We believe that since 1992 we have qualified for taxation as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. We plan to continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that may not be totally within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from certain sources that are specified in the REIT tax laws. We are also required to distribute to shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding capital gains). The fact that we hold most of our assets through our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, Congress and the Internal Revenue Service might make changes to the tax laws and regulations and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult or impossible for us to remain qualified as a REIT.


15


If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to Federal income tax at regular corporate rates. Also, unless the Internal Revenue Service granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year we first fail to qualify. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would have to pay significant income taxes and would therefore have less money available for investments or for distributions to our shareholders. In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will no longer be required to pay dividends. As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital and would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities.

We could face possible adverse changes in tax laws, which may result in an increase in our tax liability. From time to time changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which may result in an increase in our tax liability. The shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in recent years may lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such changes. If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional taxes on our assets or income. These increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the amount of cash available for payment of dividends.

A number of factors could cause our security prices to decline. As is the case with any publicly-traded securities, certain factors outside of our control could influence the value of our common and preferred shares. These conditions include, but are not limited to:

•
market perception of REITs in general and office REITs in particular;
•
market perception regarding our major tenants and sector concentrations;
•
the level of institutional investor interest in our Company;
•
general economic and business conditions;
•
prevailing interest rates;
•
our financial performance;
•
our underlying asset value;
•
market perception of our financial condition, performance, dividends and growth potential; and
•
adverse changes in tax laws.

We may experience significant losses and harm to our financial condition if financial institutions holding our cash and cash equivalents file for bankruptcy protection. We believe that we maintain our cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions. We have not experienced any losses to date on our deposited cash. However, we may incur significant losses and harm to our financial condition in the future if any of these financial institutions files for bankruptcy protection.

Certain of our Trustees have potential conflicts of interest. Certain members of our Board of Trustees own partnership units in our Operating Partnership. These individuals may have personal interests that conflict with the interests of our shareholders. For example, if our Operating Partnership sells or refinances certain of the properties that these Trustees contributed to the Operating Partnership, the Trustees could suffer adverse tax consequences. Their personal interests could conflict with our interests if such a sale or refinancing would be advantageous to us. We have certain policies in place that are designed to minimize conflicts of interest. We cannot, however, provide assurance that these policies will be successful in eliminating the influence of such conflicts, and if they are not successful, decisions could be made that might fail to reflect fully the interests of all of our shareholders.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None


16


Item 2. Properties

The following table provides certain information about our office property markets and submarkets as of December 31, 2012:
Market/Submarket and Location
 
Number of Buildings
 
Rentable Square Feet
 
Occupancy (1)
 
Annualized Rental Revenue (2)
 
Annualized Rental Revenue per Occupied Square
Foot (2)(3)
Baltimore /Washington Corridor:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Airport Square - Linthicum, MD
 
24
 
1,813,633

 
80.9
%
 
$
35,199,714

 
$23.98
Annapolis - Annapolis, MD
 
1
 
155,000

 
100.0
%
 
2,307,308

 
14.89
Arundel Preserve - Hanover, MD
 
1
 
146,666

 
100.0
%
 
3,737,998

 
25.49
BWI South - Hanover, MD
 
10
 
432,104

 
68.5
%
 
6,528,684

 
22.05
Howard County Perimeter - Columbia, MD
 
33
 
2,682,359

 
88.7
%
 
60,675,335

 
25.49
National Business Park - Annapolis Junction, MD
 
27
 
3,223,501

 
96.2
%
 
107,548,246

 
34.68
UMBC - Catonsville, MD
 
2
 
127,258

 
94.5
%
 
3,257,577

 
27.09
Subtotal / Average
 
98
 
8,580,521

 
89.4
%
 
$
219,254,862

 
$28.60
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Northern Virginia:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dulles South - Chantilly, VA
 
9
 
1,434,692

 
91.0
%
 
$
37,724,293

 
$28.88
Herndon - Herndon, VA
 
3
 
562,543

 
95.9
%
 
16,856,436

 
31.24
Merrifield - Falls Church, VA
 
1
 
180,854

 
46.0
%
 
3,059,085

 
36.75
Route 28 South - Herndon, VA
 
2
 
353,334

 
91.4
%
 
8,182,182

 
25.33
Springfield - Springfield, VA
 
1
 
83,987

 
100.0
%
 
2,944,123

 
35.05
Tyson's Corner - McLean, VA
 
3
 
605,091

 
88.8
%
 
19,378,891

 
36.08
Subtotal / Average
 
19
 
3,220,501

 
89.2
%
 
$
88,145,010

 
$30.68
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
San Antonio
 
8
 
915,093

 
96.4
%
 
$
29,159,572

 
$33.04
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Washington DC-Capitol Riverfront
 
2
 
360,326

 
89.0
%
 
$
14,464,433

 
$45.12
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
St Mary's & King George Counties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
King George County - Dahlgren, VA
 
6
 
206,207

 
91.6
%
 
$
3,758,392

 
$19.89
St. Mary's County - California, MD
 
7
 
317,835

 
75.2
%
 
4,882,294

 
20.42

St. Mary's County - Lexington Park, MD
 
6
 
379,550

 
91.6
%
 
7,298,048

 
20.99

Subtotal / Average
 
19
 
903,592

 
85.9
%
 
$
15,938,734

 
$20.55
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater Baltimore:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Baltimore City - Baltimore, MD
 
1
 
481,016

 
93.4
%
 
$
14,932,204

 
$33.22
Harford County - Aberdeen, MD
 
3
 
284,884

 
37.9
%
 
3,296,026

 
30.54
Hunt Valley/RTE 83 Corridor - Timonium, MD
 
2
 
239,835

 
100.0
%
 
5,570,833

 
23.23
White Marsh - White Marsh, MD
 
26
 
1,047,170

 
78.0
%
 
16,612,279

 
20.34
Subtotal / Average
 
32
 
2,052,905

 
78.6
%
 
$
40,411,342

 
$25.04
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Suburban Maryland:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
College Park - College Park, MD
 
2
 
242,070

 
94.9
%
 
$
7,267,194

 
$31.65
Lanham - Lanham, MD (4)
 
1
 
55,866

 
90.9
%
 
569,503

 
11.21
Subtotal / Average
 
3
 
297,936

 
94.1
%
 
$
7,836,697

 
$27.95
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Colorado Springs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Colorado Springs East - Colorado Springs, CO (5)
 
11
 
732,635

 
80.1
%
 
$
12,375,054

 
$21.09
Colorado Springs Northwest - Colorado Springs, CO
 
3
 
322,152

 
83.0
%
 
5,389,696

 
20.16
I-25 North Corridor - Colorado Springs, CO (4)
 
7
 
522,724

 
71.4
%
 
7,219,269

 
19.33
Subtotal / Average
 
21
 
1,577,511

 
77.8
%
 
$
24,984,019

 
$20.35

17


Market/Submarket and Location
 
Number of Buildings
 
Rentable Square Feet
 
Occupancy (1)
 
Annualized Rental Revenue (2)
 
Annualized Rental Revenue per Occupied Square
Foot (2)(3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater Philadelphia - Blue Bell, PA
 
3
 
488,741

 
100.0
%
 
$
9,369,523

 
$19.17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Region:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Huntsville - Huntsville, AL
 
1
 
138,466

 
83.2
%
 
$
3,136,582

 
$27.24
Richmond Southwest - Richmond, VA
 
1
 
193,000

 
100.0
%
 
5,449,908

 
28.24
Southwest Virginia - Lebanon, VA
 
1
 
102,842

 
100.0
%
 
3,705,802

 
36.03
Subtotal / Average
 
3
 
434,308

 
94.6
%
 
$
12,292,292

 
$29.91
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total /Average:
 
208
 
18,831,434

 
87.8
%
 
$
461,856,484

 
$27.92
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)    This percentage is based upon all rentable square feet under lease terms that were in effect as of December 31, 2012.
(2)
Annualized rental revenue is the monthly contractual base rent as of December 31, 2012 multiplied by 12, plus the estimated annualized expense reimbursements under existing leases. We consider annualized rental revenue to be a useful measure for analyzing revenue sources because, since it is point-in-time based, it does not contain increases and decreases in revenue associated with periods in which lease terms were not in effect; historical revenue under generally accepted accounting principles does contain such fluctuations. We find the measure particularly useful for leasing, tenant, segment and industry analysis.
(3)
Annualized rental revenue per occupied square foot is a property’s annualized rental revenue divided by that property’s occupied square feet as of December 31, 2012. Our computation of annualized rental revenue excludes the effect of lease incentives. The annualized rent per occupied square foot, including the effect of lease incentives, for our total office portfolio and two largest regions follows: total office portfolio: $27.85; Baltimore/Washington Corridor: $28.52; and Northern Virginia: $30.55.
(4)
These properties were included in our Strategic Reallocation Plan and classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2012.
(5)
Nine of these properties were included in our Strategic Reallocation Plan and classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2012.
    

18



The following table provides certain information about our office properties that were under construction or redevelopment, or for which we were contractually committed to construct, as of December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
Property and Location
 
Submarket
 
Estimated Rentable Square Feet Upon Completion
 
Percentage Leased
 
Calendar Quarter of Anticipated Completion
 
Costs Incurred to Date (1)
 
Estimated Costs to Complete (1)
Under Construction
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Baltimore/Washington Corridor:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7205 Riverwood Road
 
Howard County
 
89,268

 
100
%
 
1Q 2013
 
$
15,673

 
$
7,117

Columbia, MD
 
Perimeter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7175 Riverwood Road
 
Howard County
 
25,939

 
100
%
 
3Q 2013
 
5,927

 
3,122

Columbia, MD
 
Perimeter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
312 Sentinel Way
 
National
 
125,160

 
0
%
 
3Q 2014
 
16,366

 
20,287

Annapolis Junction, MD
 
Business Park
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
420 National Business Parkway
 
National
 
137,322

 
0
%
 
2Q 2014
 
18,043

 
17,439

Jessup, MD
 
Business Park
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subtotal/Average
 
 
 
377,689

 
31
%
 
 
 
$
56,009

 
$
47,965

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Northern Virginia:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7770 Backlick Road (Patriot Ridge)
 
Springfield
 
239,272

 
49
%
 
3Q 2013
 
$
58,143

 
$
14,574

Springfield, VA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ashburn Crossing - DC-8
 
Ashburn
 
200,000

 
100
%
 
4Q 2013
 
7,490

 
15,036

Ashburn, VA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ashburn Crossing - DC-9
 
Ashburn
 
115,000

 
100
%
 
2Q 2015
 
4,309

 
7,523

Ashburn, VA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subtotal/Average
 
 
 
554,272

 
78
%
 
 
 
$
69,942

 
$
37,133

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Huntsville:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1000 Redstone Gateway
 
Huntsville
 
121,105

 
100
%
 
1Q 2013
 
$
19,055

 
$
3,890

Huntsville, AL
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1100 Redstone Gateway
 
Huntsville
 
121,347

 
100
%
 
1Q 2014
 
1,396

 
20,281

Huntsville, AL
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1200 Redstone Gateway
 
Huntsville
 
121,088

 
100
%
 
4Q 2013
 
3,052

 
21,761

Huntsville, AL
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7200 Redstone Gateway
 
Huntsville
 
61,434

 
0
%
 
4Q 2013
 
4,530

 
3,701

Huntsville, AL
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subtotal/Average
 
 
 
424,974

 
86
%
 
 
 
$
28,033

 
$
49,633

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Under Construction
 
 
 
1,356,935
 
67
%
 
 
 
$
153,984

 
$
134,731

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Under Redevelopment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater Philadelphia:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
751 Arbor Way (Hillcrest I)
 
Greater
 
113,297

 
51
%
 
1Q 2013
 
$
19,138

 
$
2,278

Blue Bell, PA
 
Philadelphia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
721 Arbor Way (Hillcrest II)
 
Greater
 
183,466

 
59
%
 
2Q 2014
 
14,076

 
17,019

Blue Bell, PA
 
Philadelphia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Under Redevelopment
 
 
 
296,763

 
56
%
 
 
 
$
33,214

 
$
19,297


(1) Includes land, construction, leasing costs and allocated portion of structured parking and other shared infrastructure, if applicable.


19


The following table provides certain information about our land held or under pre-construction as of December 31, 2012, including properties under ground lease to us:
Market/Submarket and Location
 
Acres
 
Estimated Developable Square Feet
Strategic Land
 
 
 
 
Baltimore/Washington Corridor:
 
 

 
 

National Business Park
 
186

 
1,792,000

Columbia Gateway
 
22

 
520,000

Airport Square
 
5

 
84,000

Arundel Preserve
 
84

up to
1,150,000

Subtotal
 
297

 
3,546,000

Northern Virginia;
 
 

 
 

Westfields Corporate Center
 
23

 
400,000

Westfields Park Center
 
33

 
400,000

Woodland Park
 
5

 
225,000

Patriot Ridge
 
11

 
739,000

Ashburn Crossing
 
10

 
120,000

Subtotal
 
82

 
1,884,000

San Antonio, Texas
 
 

 
 

8100 Potranco Road
 
9

 
125,000

Northwest Crossroads
 
31

 
375,000

Sentry Gateway
 
38

 
658,000

Subtotal
 
78

 
1,158,000

Huntsville, Alabama
 
443

 
4,173,000

St. Mary’s & King George Counties
 
44

 
109,000

Greater Baltimore
 
49

 
1,340,000

Suburban Maryland
 
49

 
510,000

Total strategic land held and pre-construction
 
1,042

 
12,720,000

 
 
 
 
 
Non-Strategic Land
 
 
 
 
Baltimore/Washington Corridor
 
7

 
65,000

Greater Baltimore
 
138

 
1,352,000

Suburban Maryland
 
107

 
1,000,000

Colorado Springs
 
175

 
2,570,000

Greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 
8

 
604,000

Other (Charles County, MD)
 
217

 
967,000

Total non-strategic land held
 
652

 
6,558,000

 
 
 
 
 
Total land held and pre-construction
 
1,694

 
19,278,000


The following table provides certain information about our wholesale data center property as of December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
Property and Location


Year
Built
Gross Building Area
Raised Floor
Square Footage (1)
Initial Stabilization Critical Load (in MWs) (2)
Initial Stabilization Critical Load Leased
MW Operational
Costs Incurred to Date (3)
Estimated Costs to Completion (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9651 Hornbaker Road - Manassas, VA
2010
233,000
100,000
18
22%
6
$207,785
$67,445

(1)
Raised floor square footage is that portion of the gross building area in which tenants locate their computer servers. Raised floor area is considered to be the net rentable square footage.
(2)
Critical load is the power available for exclusive use of tenants in the property (expressed in terms of megawatts (“MWs”)).
(3)
Includes land, construction and leasing costs.

20


Lease Expirations

The following table provides a summary schedule of the lease expirations for leases in place at our office properties as of December 31, 2012, assuming that none of the tenants exercise renewal options. This analysis includes the effect of early renewals completed on existing leases but excludes the effect of new tenant leases on 264,380 square feet executed but yet to commence as of December 31, 2012.
Year of Lease Expiration (1)
 
Number of Leases Expiring
Square Footage of Leases Expiring
Percentage of Total Occupied Square Feet
Annualized Rental Revenue of Expiring Leases (2)
Percentage of Total Annualized Rental Revenue Expiring (2)
Total Annualized Rental Revenue of Expiring Leases Per Occupied Square Foot
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
2013
 
146

2,442,746

14.8
%
$
71,083

15.4
%
$
29.10

2014
 
101

2,221,075

13.4
%
63,401

13.7
%
28.54

2015
 
112

2,737,514

16.6
%
72,790

15.8
%
26.59

2016
 
79

1,637,241

9.9
%
43,799

9.5
%
26.75

2017
 
96

1,842,182

11.1
%
49,748

10.8
%
27.01

2018
 
45

1,250,397

7.6
%
32,563

7.1
%
26.04

2019
 
35

1,024,008

6.2
%
29,610

6.4
%
28.92

2020
 
33

1,294,803

7.8
%
35,590

7.7
%
27.49

2021
 
20

561,641

3.4
%
15,855

3.4
%
28.23

2022
 
12

793,969

4.8
%
23,235

5.0
%
29.26

2023
 
6

149,308

0.9
%
2,868

0.6
%
19.21

2024
 
2

29,528

0.2
%
802

0.2
%
27.15

2025
 
4

556,372

3.4
%
20,512

4.4
%
36.87

Total/Weighted Average
 
691

16,540,784

100.0
%
$
461,856

100.0
%
$
27.92


With regard to leases expiring in 2013, we believe that the weighted average annualized rental revenue per occupied square foot for such leases at December 31, 2012 was, on average, approximately 5% to 8% higher than estimated current market contractual rents for the related space, with specific results varying by market.

The following table provides a summary schedule of the lease expirations for leases in place at our wholesale data center property as of December 31, 2012:
Year of Lease Expiration
 
Number of Leases Expiring
 
Raised Floor Square Footage Expiring
 
Critical Load Leased (in megawatts)
 
Critical Load Used (in megawatts)
 
Annualized Rental Revenue of Expiring Leases (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
2019
 
1
 
7,172

 
1
 
1.00
 
$
2,098

2020
 
1
 
19,023

 
2
 
2.00
 
4,232

2022
 
1
 
5,604

 
1
 
0.25
 
391

Total/Weighted Average
 
3
 
31,799

 
4
 
3.25
 
$
6,721


(1)
Most of our leases with the United States Government provide for consecutive one-year terms or provide for early termination rights. All of the leasing statistics set forth above assumed that the United States Government will remain in the space that it leases through the end of the respective arrangements, without ending consecutive one-year leases prematurely or exercising early termination rights. We reported the statistics in this manner because we manage our leasing activities using these same assumptions and believe these assumptions to be probable.
(2)
Annualized rental revenue is the monthly contractual base rent as of December 31, 2012 multiplied by 12, plus the estimated annualized expense reimbursements under existing office leases. Our computation of annualized rental revenue excludes the effect of lease incentives, although the effect of this exclusion is generally not material.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not currently involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation currently threatened against the Company (other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, substantially all of which is expected to be covered by liability insurance).


21


Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

PART II
 
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “OFC.” The table below shows the range of the high and low sale prices for our common shares as reported on the NYSE, as well as the quarterly common share dividends per share declared:
 
 
 Price Range
 
 Dividends
2011
 
 Low
 
 High
 
  Per Share
First Quarter
 
$33.83
 
$36.90
 
$
0.4125

Second Quarter
 
$30.63
 
$36.79
 
$
0.4125

Third Quarter
 
$21.75
 
$32.07
 
$
0.4125

Fourth Quarter
 
$19.35
 
$25.96
 
$
0.4125

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Price Range
 
 Dividends
2012
 
 Low
 
 High
 
  Per Share
First Quarter
 
$20.58
 
$25.48
 
$0.2750
Second Quarter
 
$21.13
 
$24.05
 
$0.2750
Third Quarter
 
$21.36
 
$25.61
 
$0.2750
Fourth Quarter
 
$23.22
 
$26.12
 
$0.2750

The number of holders of record of our common shares was 608 as of December 31, 2012. This number does not include shareholders whose shares are held of record by a brokerage house or clearing agency, but does include any such brokerage house or clearing agency as one record holder.
We pay dividends at the discretion of our Board of Trustees. Our ability to pay cash dividends will be dependent upon: (1) the cash flow generated from our operations; (2) cash generated or used by our financing and investing activities; and (3) the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code described above and such other factors as the Board of Trustees deems relevant. Our ability to make cash dividends will also be limited by the terms of our Operating Partnership Agreement, as well as by limitations imposed by state law. In addition, we are prohibited from paying cash dividends in excess of the amount necessary for us to qualify for taxation as a REIT if a default or event of default exists pursuant to the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility; this restriction does not currently limit our ability to pay dividends, and we do not believe that this restriction is reasonably likely to limit our ability to pay future dividends because we expect to comply with the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the three months ended December 31, 2012, 139,696 of the Operating Partnership's common units were exchanged for 139,696 common shares in accordance with the Operating Partnership's Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, as amended. The issuance of these common shares was effected in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


22


Common Shares Performance Graph

The graph and the table set forth below assume $100 was invested on December 31, 2007 in the common shares of Corporate Office Properties Trust. The graph and the table compare the cumulative return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) of this investment with a $100 investment at that time in the S&P 500 Index or the All Equity REIT Index of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”):

 
 
Period Ended
Index
 
12/31/07

 
12/31/08

 
12/31/09

 
12/31/10

 
12/31/11

 
12/31/12

Corporate Office Properties Trust
 
100.00

 
101.77

 
127.51

 
126.90

 
82.21

 
101.24

S&P 500
 
100.00

 
63.00

 
79.68

 
91.68

 
93.61

 
108.59

NAREIT All Equity REIT Index
 
100.00

 
62.27

 
79.70

 
101.98

 
110.42

 
132.18





23



Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth summary financial data as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 through 2012. Since this information is only a summary, you should refer to our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the section of this report entitled “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information.
Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
(in thousands, except per share data and number of properties)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from real estate operations (1)
$
454,171

 
$
428,496

 
$
387,559

 
$
349,463

 
$
326,223

Construction contract and other service revenues
73,836

 
84,345

 
104,675

 
343,087

 
188,385

Total revenues
528,007

 
512,841

 
492,234

 
692,550

 
514,608

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating expenses (1)(2)(3)
167,161

 
162,397

 
146,617

 
123,769

 
109,967

Depreciation and amortization associated with real estate operations (1)
113,480

 
113,111

 
97,897

 
81,446

 
75,264

Construction contract and other service expenses
70,576

 
81,639

 
102,302

 
336,519

 
184,142

Impairment losses
43,214

 
83,478

 
—

 
—

 
—

General, administrative and leasing expenses (3)(4)
31,900

 
30,314

 
28,501

 
27,877

 
28,739

Business development expenses and land carry costs (2)
5,711

 
6,122

 
6,403

 
5,259

 
2,206

Total operating expenses
432,042

 
477,061

 
381,720

 
574,870

 
400,318

Operating income
95,965

 
35,780

 
110,514

 
117,680

 
114,290

Interest expense (1)
(94,624
)
 
(98,222
)
 
(95,729
)
 
(76,718
)
 
(79,542
)
Interest and other income
7,172

 
5,603

 
9,568

 
5,164

 
2,070

(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt
(943
)
 
(1,639
)
 
—

 
—

 
8,101

Loss on interest rate derivatives
—

 
(29,805
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Income (loss) from continuing operations before equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated entities and income taxes
7,570

 
(88,283
)
 
24,353

 
46,126

 
44,919

Equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated entities
(546
)
 
(331
)
 
1,376

 
(941
)
 
(147
)
Income tax (expense) benefit (4)
(381
)
 
6,710

 
(108
)
 
(196
)
 
(201
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
6,643

 
(81,904
)
 
25,621

 
44,989

 
44,571

Discontinued operations (1)(2)(3)(5)
13,677

 
(48,404
)
 
17,054

 
16,310

 
15,655

Income (loss) before gain on sales of real estate
20,320

 
(130,308
)
 
42,675

 
61,299

 
60,226

Gain on sales of real estate, net of income taxes (1)(6)
21

 
2,732

 
2,829

 
—

 
1,090

Net income (loss)
20,341

 
(127,576
)
 
45,504

 
61,299

 
61,316

Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests (4)
636

 
8,148

 
(2,744
)
 
(4,970
)
 
(7,351
)
Net income (loss) attributable to Corporate Office Properties Trust
20,977

 
(119,428
)
 
42,760

 
56,329

 
53,965

Preferred share dividends
(20,844
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
Issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares (7)
(1,827
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Net (loss) income attributable to Corporate Office Properties Trust common shareholders
$
(1,694
)
 
$
(135,530
)
 
$
26,658

 
$
40,227

 
$
37,863

Basic earnings per common share (8)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(1.31
)
 
$
0.17

 
$
0.44

 
$
0.50

Net (loss) income
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(1.97
)
 
$
0.43

 
$
0.70

 
$
0.77

Diluted earnings per common share (8)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(1.31
)
 
$
0.17

 
$
0.44

 
$
0.49

Net (loss) income
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(1.97
)
 
$
0.43

 
$
0.70

 
$
0.76

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic
73,454

 
69,382

 
59,611

 
55,930

 
48,132

Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted
73,454

 
69,382

 
59,944

 
56,407

 
48,820



24


 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
Balance Sheet Data (as of year end):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total properties, net
$
3,163,044

 
$
3,352,975

 
$
3,445,455

 
$
3,029,900

 
$
2,778,466

Total assets (4)
$
3,653,759

 
$
3,863,555

 
$
3,844,517

 
$
3,380,022

 
$
3,114,239

Debt
$
2,019,168

 
$
2,426,303

 
$
2,323,681

 
$
2,053,841

 
$
1,856,751

Total liabilities (4)
$
2,206,962

 
$
2,648,748

 
$
2,521,379

 
$
2,259,390

 
$
2,031,816

Redeemable noncontrolling interest (4)
$
10,298

 
$
8,908

 
$
9,000

 
$
—

 
$
—

Total equity (4)(9)
$
1,436,499

 
$
1,205,899

 
$
1,323,138

 
$
1,120,632

 
$
1,082,423

Other Financial Data (for the year ended):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flows provided by (used in):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
$
191,838

 
$
152,143

 
$
156,436

 
$
194,817

 
$
180,892

Investing activities
$
13,744

 
$
(260,387
)
 
$
(479,167
)
 
$
(349,076
)
 
$
(290,822
)
Financing activities
$
(200,547
)
 
$
103,701

 
$
324,571

 
$
155,746

 
$
92,067

Numerator for diluted EPS (4)
$
(2,163
)
 
$
(136,567
)
 
$
25,587

 
$
39,217

 
$
37,135

Diluted funds from operations (4)(9)
$
165,720

 
$
53,062

 
$
148,645

 
$
152,626

 
$
143,592

Diluted funds from operations per share (4)(9)
$
2.13

 
$
0.72

 
$
2.30

 
$
2.46

 
$
2.52

Cash dividends declared per common share
$
1.10

 
$
1.65

 
$
1.61

 
$
1.53

 
$
1.425

Property Data (as of year end):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of properties owned (10)
208

 
238

 
256

 
253

 
240

Total rentable square feet owned (10)
18,831

 
20,514

 
20,432

 
19,543

 
18,559

(1)
Certain prior period amounts pertaining to properties included in discontinued operations have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. These reclassifications did not affect consolidated net income or shareholders’ equity.
(2)
Certain prior period amounts pertaining to expenses on properties not in operations have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation, as described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in the section entitled “Reclassifications.” These reclassifications did not affect consolidated net income or shareholders’ equity.
(3)
Certain prior period amounts pertaining to costs expensed in connection with marketing space for lease to prospective tenants have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation, as described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in the section entitled “Reclassifications.” These reclassifications did not affect consolidated net income or shareholders’ equity.
(4)
Certain amounts as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2011 were revised in connection with errors identified in 2012 described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in the section entitled “Revisions.” These revisions affected consolidated net income and shareholders’ equity.
(5)
Includes income derived from three operating properties disposed in 2008, three operating properties disposed in 2010, 23 operating properties disposed in 2011, 35 operating properties disposed in 2012 and 17 operating properties classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012 (see Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements).
(6)
Reflects gain from sales of properties and unconsolidated real estate joint ventures not associated with discontinued operations.
(7)
Reflects a decrease to net income available to common shareholders pertaining to the original issuance costs recognized upon the redemption of the Series G preferred shares of beneficial interest in 2012.
(8)
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are calculated based on amounts attributable to common shareholders of Corporate Office Properties Trust.
(9)
For definitions of diluted funds from operations per share and diluted funds from operations and reconciliations of these measures to their comparable measures under generally accepted accounting principles, you should refer to the section entitled “Funds from Operations” within the section entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
(10)
Amounts reported reflect only operating office properties.



25


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should refer to our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and our Selected Financial Data table as you read this section.

This section contains “forward-looking” statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about future events and financial trends affecting the financial condition and operations of our business. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “plan” or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which we cannot predict with accuracy and some of which we might not even anticipate. Although we believe that the expectations, estimates and projections reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions at the time made, we can give no assurance that these expectations, estimates and projections will be achieved. Future events and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that may affect these expectations, estimates and projections include, but are not limited to:

•
general economic and business conditions, which will, among other things, affect office property and data center demand and rents, tenant creditworthiness, interest rates, financing availability and property values;
•
adverse changes in the real estate markets, including, among other things, increased competition with other companies;
•
governmental actions and initiatives, including risks associated with the impact of a government shutdown or budgetary reductions or impasses, such as a reduction in rental revenues, non-renewal of leases and/or a curtailment of demand for additional space by our strategic customers;
•
our ability to borrow on favorable terms;
•
risks of real estate acquisition and development activities, including, among other things, risks that development projects may not be completed on schedule, that tenants may not take occupancy or pay rent or that development or operating costs may be greater than anticipated;
•
our ability to sell properties included in our Strategic Reallocation Plan;
•
risks of investing through joint venture structures, including risks that our joint venture partners may not fulfill their financial obligations as investors or may take actions that are inconsistent with our objectives;
•
changes in our plans for properties or views of market economic conditions or failure to obtain development rights, either of which could result in recognition of significant impairment losses;
•
our ability to satisfy and operate effectively under Federal income tax rules relating to real estate investment trusts and partnerships;
•
the dilutive effects of issuing additional common shares;
•
our ability to achieve projected results; and
•
environmental requirements.

We undertake no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements.
 
Overview
 
We are an office real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that focuses primarily on serving the specialized requirements of United States Government agencies and defense contractors, most of whom are engaged in defense information technology and national security related activities. We generally acquire, develop, manage and lease office and data center properties concentrated in large office parks located near knowledge-based government demand drivers and/or in targeted markets or submarkets in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region.

Our revenues relating to real estate operations are derived from rents and property operating expense reimbursements earned from tenants leasing space in our properties. Most of our expenses relating to our real estate operations take the form of: property operating costs, such as real estate taxes, utilities and repairs and maintenance; and depreciation and amortization associated with our operating properties. Most of our profitability from real estate operations depends on our ability to maintain high levels of occupancy and increase rents, which is affected by a number of factors, including, among other things, our tenants’ ability to fulfill their lease obligations and their continuing space needs based on, among other things, employment levels, business confidence, competition and general economic conditions of the markets in which we operate.

Our strategy for operations and growth focuses on serving the specialized requirements of United States Government agencies and defense contractors, most of whom are engaged in defense information technology and national security related activities. These tenants’ missions generally pertain more to knowledge-based activities (such as cyber security, research and development and other highly technical defense and security areas) than to force structure (troops) and weapon system

26


production. As a result of this strategy, a large concentration of our revenue is derived from several large tenants. As of December 31, 2012, 64.5% of our annualized rental revenue (as defined below) from office properties was from our 20 largest tenants, 40.9% from our four largest tenants and 24.2% from our largest tenant, the United States Government. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, 70.0% of the total annualized rental revenue of our office properties held for long-term investment was from properties located near defense installations and other knowledge-based government demand drivers (referred to elsewhere as “Strategic Demand Drivers”), or that were otherwise at least 50% leased by United States Government agencies or defense contractors; we refer to these properties herein as “Strategic Tenant Properties.”

We made significant progress in 2012 under the Strategic Reallocation Plan that we launched in 2011, which entails the disposition by the end of 2013 of approximately $562.0 million in office properties and land no longer closely aligned with our strategy, and use of the proceeds to invest in Strategic Tenant Properties, to repay borrowings and for general corporate purposes. In 2012, we completed dispositions of 35 operating properties totaling 2.3 million square feet and non-operating properties for aggregate transaction values totaling $313.6 million. Aggregate dispositions since implementation of the Strategic Reallocation Plan total $390.3 million, including 58 operating properties totaling 3.2 million square feet. We used most of the proceeds from these sales to pay down our Revolving Credit Facility. In 2012, we also approved a plan for the future disposition of our office properties and developable land in Greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania because the properties no longer meet our strategic investment criteria; we expect this disposition to occur in the next four years.

Our operations in recent years have been hindered by continuing delays in Federal budget approvals and mounting uncertainty regarding the potential for future reductions in government spending targeting defense, as well as the otherwise challenging economic conditions in the United States. Furthermore, the Budget Control Act passed in 2011, which imposed caps on the Federal budget in order to achieve targeted spending levels over the 2013-2021 fiscal years, currently requires that $110 billion be sequestered from the United States Government’s funding levels for the 2013 fiscal year, approximately 50% of which could come from defense; this action could feasibly begin to occur as early as March 2013, although we believe that such sequestrations could be further deferred, reduced or eliminated if reduction levels are agreed to in the 2013 Federal budget. This defense spending uncertainty has delayed our progress in leasing existing properties and new construction proximate to Strategic Demand Drivers. In addition, the otherwise challenging economic conditions have prompted certain operations to consolidate and businesses to close, downsize their space requirements or cancel or delay expansion plans in our regions, placing downward pressure on occupancy and rental rates.

Despite these challenges, our office property portfolio’s occupancy improved to 87.8% as of December 31, 2012, a 1.6% increase over year end 2011. We also successfully completed 3.3 million square feet of leasing, including 1.2 million of construction and redevelopment space. The improvement in our portfolio’s occupancy was attributable primarily to an improvement in occupancy of our Same Office Properties (defined below) to 89.1% at December 31, 2012 (up from 88.3% at December 31, 2011) and our dispositions in 2012 of lower occupancy properties under the Strategic Reallocation Plan. Our properties proximate to Strategic Demand Drivers were 92.1% occupied at December 31, 2012, notably stronger than our other properties, which were 84.4% occupied.

We believe that the continuing Federal budget discussions will eventually lead to modest additional reductions in defense spending. However, if such reductions were to occur, we continue to believe that our properties’ proximate to Strategic Demand Drivers will not be significantly affected, and could position us for future growth, for reasons that include the following:

•
we expect defense spending reductions, should they occur, will be targeted more towards force structure (troops) and weapon system production than towards the knowledge-based activities of most of our tenants, which we believe are considered increasingly critical to our national security;
•
in 2011, Federal agencies completed their relocation to the following government installations that serve as demand drivers to our portfolio of Strategic Tenant Properties primarily in connection with mandates by the Base Realignment and Closure Commission of the United States Congress (“BRAC”): Fort George G. Meade (which also houses the recently-formed United States Cyber Command), Redstone Arsenal, Fort Belvoir, San Antonio and Aberdeen Proving Ground; the shifting of jobs by defense contractors supporting these agencies that we believe still needs to occur has been delayed by the defense spending uncertainty;
•
if defense construction spending is cut, government demand to lease space in our business parks could possibly increase if the government decides to lease space instead of build it.

We believe that the outlook for our properties proximate to Strategic Demand Drivers would be hindered more by an extended period of uncertainty regarding future defense spending reductions than by the actual spending reductions.


27


The relative contribution to our operations by properties not proximate to Strategic Demand Drivers has decreased due to our property dispositions in 2011 and 2012, and we expect that trend to continue as we complete the Strategic Reallocation Plan. Nevertheless, our market strategy is to continue to own these types of properties in targeted markets or submarkets in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region with strong growth attributes. These properties tend to be more subject to general market conditions that have been affected by the slow economic recovery. As a result, we expect a longer road to recovery to pre-recession occupancy levels for these properties.

Our capital strategy is aimed at maintaining a flexible capital structure, and we believe that we significantly improved our balance sheet and expanded our access to capital in 2012 not only through our execution of the Strategic Reallocation Plan but also by:

•
issuing 6.9 million Series L Cumulative Preferred Shares (the “Series L Preferred Shares”) at a price of $25.00 per share for net proceeds of $165.7 million after underwriting discounts but before offering expenses. These shares are nonvoting, redeemable for cash at $25.00 per share at our option on or after June 27, 2017 and accrue dividends equal to 7.375% of the liquidation preference. The net proceeds were used to pay down our Revolving Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes;
•
redeeming all of our Series G Preferred Shares of beneficial interest (the “Series G Preferred Shares”) at a price of $25.00 per share, or $55.0 million in the aggregate, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon through the date of redemption. These shares accrued dividends equal to 8.0% of the liquidation preference;
•
completing a public offering of 8.6 million common shares at a price of $24.75 per share for net proceeds of $204.9 million after underwriter discounts but before offering expenses, and using the proceeds to pay down our Revolving Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes;
•
entering into unsecured term loan agreements, under which we borrowed $370 million in the aggregate.  The net proceeds from these borrowings were used to pay down our Revolving Credit Facility; and
•
established an at-the-market (“ATM”) stock offering program under which we may, from time to time, offer and sell common shares in “at the market” stock offerings having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $150.0 million.

These activities contributed towards our: improving the relationship of our outstanding debt relative to both assets and adjusted earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization (“adjusted EBITDA,” which we define below); improving the relationship of our interest expense to adjusted EBITDA; and paying down our Revolving Credit Facility to zero by the end of 2012, providing significant liquidity and flexibility for future investing and financing activities.

Our 2012 investing activities grew our portfolio’s concentration in Strategic Tenant Properties through the dispositions of nonstrategic properties discussed above and by:

•
placing into service an aggregate of 371,000 square feet in four newly constructed properties proximate to Strategic Demand Drivers that were 45.8% leased as of December 31, 2012; and
•
acquiring for $48.3 million a property in Herndon, Virginia totaling 202,000 square feet that was 100% leased to a defense contractor.

We discuss significant factors contributing to changes in our net income attributable to common shareholders and diluted earnings per share over the last three years in the section below entitled “Results of Operations.” In addition, the section below entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” includes discussions of, among other things:

•
how we expect to generate cash for short and long-term capital needs;
•
our off-balance sheet arrangements in place that are reasonably likely to affect our financial condition; and
•
our commitments and contingencies.

We refer to the measure “annualized rental revenue” in various sections of the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Annualized rental revenue is a measure that we use to evaluate the source of our rental revenue as of a point in time. It is computed by multiplying by 12 the sum of monthly contractual base rents and estimated monthly expense reimbursements under active leases as of a point in time. Our computation of annualized rental revenue excludes the effect of lease incentives, although the effect of this exclusion is generally not material. We consider annualized rental revenue to be a useful measure for analyzing revenue sources because, since it is point-in-time based, it does not contain increases and decreases in revenue associated with periods in which lease terms were not in effect; historical revenue under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) does contain such fluctuations. We find the measure particularly useful for leasing, tenant, segment and industry analysis.


28


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make certain estimates and assumptions. A summary of our significant accounting policies is provided in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. The following section is a summary of certain aspects of those accounting policies involving estimates and assumptions that (1) require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments in accounting for uncertain matters or matters that are susceptible to change and (2) materially affect our reported operating performance or financial condition. It is possible that the use of different reasonable estimates or assumptions in making these judgments could result in materially different amounts being reported in our consolidated financial statements. While reviewing this section, you should refer to Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, including terms defined therein.

As described further in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in the section entitled “Revisions,” during 2012, we identified errors in the consolidated financial statements pertaining to our:

•
recognition of a deferred tax asset resulting from an impairment of assets in the fourth quarter of 2011 that failed to consider a partial reversal of that asset that would result from a cancellation of related inter-company debt in the first quarter of 2012;
•
over-accrual of incentive compensation cost for the year ended December 31, 2011;
•
misapplication of accounting guidance requiring that we recognize loss allocations to a noncontrolling interest holder in a consolidated real estate joint venture associated with decreases in such holder’s claim on the book value of the joint venture’s assets, despite the fact that the real estate held by the joint venture was under development and the joint venture had no underlying losses under GAAP; and
•
reporting for a noncontrolling interest in a consolidated real estate joint venture for which the holder of such interest possesses the right of requiring us to acquire the interest at fair value.

With respect to the errors described in the first two bullets above, we assessed the materiality of these errors on the financial statements in connection with previously filed periodic reports and concluded at such time that the errors were not material to any prior annual or interim periods. In assessing the cumulative effect of all such errors, we have since concluded that a correction of the errors in 2012 could be considered material to our 2012 net income. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2011 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K were revised. For each of the calendar quarters from January 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011, amounts included in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements pertaining to such periods have been revised, and we will revise the financial statements in future filings including such periods.

Acquisitions of Properties

When we acquire properties, we allocate the purchase price to numerous tangible and intangible components. Most of the terms in this bullet section are discussed in further detail in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements entitled “Acquisitions of Properties.” Our process for determining the allocation to these components requires many estimates and assumptions, including the following: (1) determination of market rental rates; (2) estimation of leasing and tenant improvement costs associated with the remaining term of acquired leases; (3) assumptions used in determining the in-place lease value, if-vacant value and tenant relationship value, including the rental rates, period of time that it will take to lease vacant space and estimated tenant improvement and leasing costs; and (4) allocation of the if-vacant value between land and building. A change in any of the above key assumptions, which are subjective, can materially change not only the presentation of acquired properties in our consolidated financial statements but also our reported results of operations. The allocation to different components affects the following:

•
the amount of the purchase price allocated among different categories of assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets; the amount of costs assigned to individual properties in multiple property acquisitions; and the amount of gain recognized in our consolidated statements of operations should we determine that the fair value of the acquisition exceeds its cost;
•
where the amortization of the components appear over time in our consolidated statements of operations. Allocations to above- and below-market leases are amortized into rental revenue, whereas allocations to most of the other tangible and intangible assets are amortized into depreciation and amortization expense. As a REIT, this is important to us since much of the investment community evaluates our operating performance using non-GAAP measures such as funds from operations, the computation of which includes rental revenue but does not include depreciation and amortization expense; and
•
the timing over which the items are recognized as revenue or expense in our consolidated statements of operations. For example, for allocations to the as-if vacant value, the land portion is not depreciated and the building portion is depreciated

29


over a longer period of time than the other components (generally 40 years). Allocations to above- and below-market leases, in-place lease value and tenant relationship value are amortized over significantly shorter timeframes, and if individual tenants' leases are terminated early, any unamortized amounts remaining associated with those tenants are written off upon termination. These differences in timing can materially affect our reported results of operations. In addition, we establish lives for tenant relationship values based on our estimates of how long we expect the respective tenants to remain in the properties.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We assess each of our operating properties for impairment quarterly using cash flow projections and estimated fair values that we derive for each of the properties.  We update the leasing and other assumptions used in these projections regularly, paying particular attention to properties that have experienced chronic vacancy or face significant market challenges.  We review our plans and intentions for our development projects and land parcels quarterly.  Each quarter, we also review the reasonableness of changes in our estimated operating property fair values from amounts estimated in the prior quarter.  If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of certain operating properties, properties in development or land held for future development may be impaired, we perform a recovery analysis for such properties. For long-lived assets to be held and used, we analyze recoverability based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated from the operations and eventual disposition of the assets over, in most cases, a ten-year holding period.  If we believe there is a significant possibility that we might dispose of the assets earlier, we analyze recoverability using a probability weighted analysis of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated from the operations and eventual disposition of the assets over the various possible holding periods.  If the analysis indicates that the carrying value of a tested property is not recoverable from estimated future cash flows, it is written down to its estimated fair value and an impairment loss is recognized. If and when our plans change, we revise our recoverability analyses to use the cash flows expected from the operations and eventual disposition of each asset using holding periods that are consistent with our revised plans.

Property fair values are determined based on contract prices, indicative bids, discounted cash flow analyses or yield analyses. Estimated cash flows used in such analyses are based on our plans for the property and our views of market and economic conditions. The estimates consider items such as current and future rental rates, occupancies for the tested property and comparable properties, estimated operating and capital expenditures and recent sales data for comparable properties; most of these items are influenced by market data obtained from third party sources such as CoStar Group and real estate leasing and brokerage firms and our direct experience with the properties and their markets. Determining the appropriate capitalization or yield rate also requires significant judgment and is typically based on many factors, including the prevailing rate for the market or submarket, as well as the quality and location of the properties. Changes in the estimated future cash flows due to changes in our plans for a property, views of market and economic conditions and/or our ability to obtain development rights could result in recognition of impairment losses which could be substantial.

Properties held for sale are carried at the lower of their carrying values (i.e., cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment loss recognized, where applicable) or estimated fair values less costs to sell. Accordingly, decisions to sell certain operating properties, properties in development or land held for development will result in impairment losses if carrying values of the specific properties exceed their estimated fair values less costs to sell. The estimates of fair value consider matters such as recent sales data for comparable properties and, where applicable, contracts or the results of negotiations with prospective purchasers. These estimates are subject to revision as market conditions, and our assessment of such conditions, change.

Assessment of Lease Term

As discussed above, a significant portion of our portfolio is leased to the United States Government, and the majority of those leases consist of a series of one-year renewal options. Applicable accounting guidance requires us to recognize minimum rental payments on a straight-line basis over the terms of each lease and to assess the lease terms as including all periods for which failure to renew the lease imposes a penalty on the lessee in such amounts that a renewal appears, at the inception of the lease, to be reasonably assured. Factors to consider when determining whether a penalty is significant include the uniqueness of the purpose or location of the property, the availability of a comparable replacement property, the relative importance or significance of the property to the continuation of the lessee's line of business and the existence of leasehold improvements or other assets whose value would be impaired by the lessee vacating or discontinuing use of the leased property. We have concluded for a number of our leases, based on the factors above, that the United States Government's exercise of all of those renewal options is reasonably assured. Changes in these assessments could result in the write-off of any recorded assets associated with straight-line rental revenue and acceleration of depreciation and amortization expense associated with costs we have incurred related to these leases.


30


Revenue Recognition on Tenant Improvements

Most of our leases involve some form of improvements to leased space. When we are required to provide improvements under the terms of a lease, we need to determine whether the improvements constitute landlord assets or tenant assets. If the improvements are landlord assets, we capitalize the cost of the improvements and recognize depreciation expense associated with such improvements over the shorter of the useful life of the assets or the term of the lease and recognize any payments from the tenant as rental revenue over the term of the lease. If the improvements are tenant assets, we defer the cost of improvements funded by us as a lease incentive asset and amortize it as a reduction of rental revenue over the term of the lease. Our determination of whether improvements are landlord assets or tenant assets also may affect when we commence revenue recognition in connection with a lease.

In determining whether improvements constitute landlord or tenant assets, we consider numerous factors that may require subjective or complex judgments, including: whether the improvements are unique to the tenant or reusable by other tenants; whether the tenant is permitted to alter or remove the improvements without our consent or without compensating us for any lost fair value; whether the ownership of the improvements remains with us or remains with the tenant at the end of the lease term; and whether the economic substance of the lease terms is properly reflected.

Collectability of Accounts and Deferred Rent Receivable

Allowances for doubtful accounts and deferred rent receivable are established based on quarterly analyses of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The analyses place particular emphasis on past-due accounts and consider information such as the nature and age of the receivables, the payment history of the tenants, the financial condition of the tenants and our assessment of their ability to meet their lease obligations, the basis for any disputes and the status of related negotiations. Our estimate of the required allowance is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions on tenants.

Accounting Method for Investments

We use three different accounting methods to report our investments in entities: the consolidation method; the equity method; and the cost method (see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements). We use the consolidation method when we own most of the outstanding voting interests in an entity and can control its operations. We also consolidate certain entities when control of such entities can be achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Generally, this applies to entities for which either: (1) the equity investors (if any) lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest; (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without additional subordinated financial support; or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest. We use the equity method of accounting when we own an interest in an entity and can exert significant influence over, but cannot control, the entity's operations.

In making these determinations, we need to make subjective estimates and judgments regarding the entity's future operating performance, financial condition, future valuation and other variables that may affect the cash flows of the entity. We must consider both our and our partner's ability to participate in the management of the entity’s operations and make decisions that allow the parties to manage their economic risks. We may also need to estimate the probability of different scenarios taking place over time and their effect on the partners’ cash flows. The conclusion reached as a result of this process affects whether or not we use the consolidation method in accounting for our investment or the equity method. Whether or not we consolidate an investment can materially affect our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Interest Rate Derivatives

We use interest rate derivatives to hedge the cash flows associated with interest rates on debt, including forecasted borrowings. When we designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, we defer the effective portion of changes in its fair value to the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) section of shareholders' equity and recognize the ineffective portion of changes in fair value of derivatives in earnings. If and when a derivative ceases to qualify as a cash flow hedge, we reclassify the associated accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to net earnings (loss). Our accounting for derivatives requires that we make judgments in determining the nature of the derivatives and their effectiveness as hedges, including ones regarding the likelihood that a forecasted transaction will take place. Therefore, these judgments could materially affect our consolidated financial statements.

 

31


Concentration of Operations

Customer Concentration of Property Operations

The table below sets forth the 20 largest tenants in our portfolio of office properties based on percentage of annualized rental revenue:
 
 
Percentage of Annualized Rental
 
 
Revenue of Office Properties
 
 
for 20 Largest Tenants as of December 31,
Tenant
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
United States of America
 
24.2
%
 
22.2
%
 
21.6
%
Northrop Grumman Corporation (1)
 
6.3
%
 
6.9
%
 
7.2
%
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
 
5.5
%
 
5.1
%
 
4.7
%
Computer Sciences Corporation (1)
 
4.8
%
 
4.8
%
 
4.1
%
General Dynamics Corporation (1)
 
3.6
%
 
1.5
%
 
1.0
%
CareFirst, Inc.
 
1.9
%
 
1.6
%
 
1.7
%
The MITRE Corporation
 
1.9
%
 
1.8
%
 
1.8
%
ITT Exelis (1)
 
1.7
%
 
1.7
%
 
1.8
%
The Aerospace Corporation (1)
 
1.7
%
 
1.7
%
 
1.7
%
Wells Fargo & Company (1)
 
1.7
%
 
1.7
%
 
1.6
%
Kratos Defense & Security Solution, Inc. (1)
 
1.5
%
 
1.4
%
 
1.4
%
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (1)
 
1.4
%
 
1.6
%
 
1.6
%
The Boeing Company (1)
 
1.4
%
 
1.3
%
 
1.3
%
AT&T Corporation (1)
 
1.2
%
 
1.2
%
 
1.2
%
Raytheon Company (1)
 
1.1
%
 
1.0
%
 
N/A

Ciena Corporation
 
1.0
%
 
1.1
%
 
1.0
%
Science Applications International Corporation (1)
 
1.0
%
 
0.9
%
 
N/A

Lockheed Martin Corporation
 
0.8
%
 
N/A

 
N/A

The Johns Hopkins Institutions (1)
 
0.8
%
 
0.8
%
 
0.8
%
Unisys Corporation
 
0.8
%
 
0.8
%
 
0.9
%
Comcast Corporation (1)
 
N/A

 
1.2
%
 
1.3
%
Merck & Co., Inc. (1)
 
N/A

 
N/A

 
0.6
%
First Mariner Bank (1)
 
N/A

 
N/A

 
0.6
%
Subtotal of 20 largest tenants
 
64.5
%
 
60.3
%
 
57.9
%
All remaining tenants
 
35.5
%
 
39.7
%
 
42.1
%
Total
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Includes affiliated organizations and agencies and predecessor companies.

The United States Government’s concentration increased each of the last two years in large part due to it taking occupancy of a significant portion of our newly-constructed square feet placed into service and our significant dispositions of properties in which it was not a tenant.

Our Strategic Tenant Properties accounted for 70.0% of our annualized rental revenue from office properties held for long-term investment at December 31, 2012. We believe that we are well positioned for future growth in the concentration of our revenue derived from customers in these sectors, as discussed further in the section in Item 1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K entitled “Business and Growth Strategies.”


32


Geographic Concentration of Property Operations

The table below sets forth the regional allocation of our annualized rental revenue of office properties as of the end of the last three calendar years:
 
 
Percentage of Annualized Rental
 
Number of
 
 
Revenue of Office
 
Office Properties
 
 
Properties as of December 31,
 
as of December 31,
Region
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Baltimore/Washington Corridor
 
47.5
%
 
45.6
%
 
44.1
%
 
98

 
111

 
112

Northern Virginia
 
19.1
%
 
16.0
%
 
16.4
%
 
19

 
17

 
17

San Antonio
 
6.3
%
 
5.8
%
 
5.7
%
 
8

 
9

 
8

Washington, DC - Capitol Riverfront
 
3.1
%
 
3.0
%
 
3.4
%
 
2

 
2

 
2

St. Mary’s and King George Counties
 
3.4
%
 
3.4
%
 
2.9
%
 
19

 
19

 
18

Greater Baltimore
 
8.8
%
 
12.6
%
 
14.9
%
 
32

 
46

 
66

Suburban Maryland
 
1.7
%
 
4.1
%
 
3.9
%
 
3

 
8

 
8

Colorado Springs
 
5.4
%
 
5.1
%
 
5.2
%
 
21

 
21

 
21

Greater Philadelphia
 
2.0
%
 
1.7
%
 
1.5
%
 
3

 
2

 
2

Other
 
2.7
%
 
2.7
%
 
2.0
%
 
3

 
3

 
2

 
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
208

 
238

 
256


The most significant changes in our regional allocations set forth above were due to newly-constructed properties placed into service and our significant dispositions of properties in the Greater Baltimore and Suburban Maryland regions.

Occupancy and Leasing
 
Office Properties
 
The tables below set forth occupancy information pertaining to our portfolio of operating office properties:
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Occupancy rates at period end
 

 
 

 
 
Total
87.8
%
 
86.2
%
 
87.6
%
Baltimore/Washington Corridor
89.4
%
 
87.9
%
 
88.1
%
Northern Virginia
89.2
%
 
84.8
%
 
91.9
%
San Antonio
96.4
%
 
90.7
%
 
100.0
%
Washington, DC - Capitol Riverfront
89.0
%
 
91.6
%
 
98.5
%
St. Mary’s and King George Counties
85.9
%
 
87.3
%
 
86.8
%
Greater Baltimore
78.6
%
 
84.5
%
 
85.0
%
Suburban Maryland
94.1
%
 
79.6
%
 
76.5
%
Colorado Springs
77.8
%
 
74.9
%
 
76.2
%
Greater Philadelphia
100.0
%
 
99.7
%
 
100.0
%
Other
94.6
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
Average contractual annual rental rate per square foot at year end (1)
$
27.92

 
$
26.59

 
$
25.58


(1) 
Includes estimated expense reimbursements.

33


 
Rentable
Square Feet
 
Occupied
Square Feet
 
(in thousands)
December 31, 2011
20,514

 
17,685

Square feet vacated upon lease expiration (1)
—

 
(782
)
Occupancy of previously vacated space in connection with new lease (2)
—

 
717

Square feet constructed or redeveloped
425

 
548

Acquisition
202

 
202

Dispositions
(2,302
)
 
(1,833
)
Other changes
(8
)
 
4

December 31, 2012
18,831

 
16,541


(1) 
Includes lease terminations and space reductions occurring in connection with lease renewals.
(2)
Excludes occupancy of vacant square feet acquired or developed.

Please refer to the section above entitled “Overview” for discussion regarding our leasing activity in 2012 and our expectations regarding the future outlook. As the table above reflects, much of the increase in our total occupancy from 2011 to 2012 was attributable to our disposition of properties with lower occupancy rates. Occupancy of our Same Office Properties was 89.1% at December 31, 2012, up slightly from 88.3% at December 31, 2011.

In 2012, we completed 3.3 million square feet of leasing, including 1.2 million of construction and redevelopment space. Our construction leasing was highlighted by: Strategic Demand Driver leasing of 363,000 square feet in three properties proximate to Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville (our first construction leasing in that region) and 115,000 square feet in Riverwood Corporate Park in the Baltimore/Washington Corridor; and 315,000 square feet in two properties on land we acquired in Ashburn, Virginia, a market we were targeting to add to our Northern Virginia holdings. At December 31, 2012, we had 1.4 million square feet under construction that was 67% leased.

In 2012, we renewed 64.3% of the square footage of our lease expirations (including the effect of early renewals). The annualized rents of these renewals decreased on average by approximately 4.2% and revenue under GAAP increased on average by approximately 2.2% relative to the leases previously in place for the space; these leases had a weighted average lease term of approximately 3.3 years and the average estimated tenant improvements and lease costs associated with completing this leasing was approximately $6.35 per square foot.

We believe that our continuing exposure to the challenging leasing environment described above in the section entitled “Overview” is mitigated to a certain extent by the generally long-term nature of our leases and the staggered timing of our future lease expirations. Our weighted average lease term for office properties at December 31, 2012 was approximately four years. The table below sets forth as of December 31, 2012 our scheduled lease expirations of office properties by region in terms of percentage of annualized rental revenue:
 
 
Expiration of Annualized Rental
 
 
Revenue of Office Properties
 
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
Thereafter
 
Total
Baltimore/Washington Corridor
 
11.2
%
 
4.7
%
 
7.8
%
 
5.6
%
 
6.5
%
 
11.7
%
 
47.5
%
Northern Virginia
 
0.9
%
 
5.6
%
 
4.5
%
 
1.1
%
 
2.3
%
 
4.7
%
 
19.1
%
San Antonio
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
6.3
%
 
6.3
%
Washington, DC - Capitol Riverfront
 
1.1
%
 
0.7
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.4
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.6
%
 
3.1
%
St. Mary’s and King George Counties
 
0.8
%
 
0.7
%
 
1.1
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.5
%
 
3.4
%
Greater Baltimore
 
0.4
%
 
0.5
%
 
1.0
%
 
1.4
%
 
1.2
%
 
4.3
%
 
8.8
%
Suburban Maryland
 
0.3
%
 
0.1
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.1
%
 
1.2
%
 
1.7
%
Colorado Springs
 
0.7
%
 
0.7
%
 
0.5
%
 
0.6
%
 
0.6
%
 
2.3
%
 
5.4
%
Greater Philadelphia
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.6
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
1.4
%
 
2.0
%
Other
 
0.0
%
 
0.7
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
2.0
%
 
2.7
%
Total
 
15.4
%
 
13.7
%
 
15.8
%
 
9.5
%
 
10.8
%
 
34.9
%
 
100.0
%

With regard to leases expiring in 2013, we believe that the weighted average annualized rental revenue per occupied square foot for such leases at December 31, 2012 was, on average, approximately 5% to 8% higher than estimated current market contractual rents for the related space, with specific results varying by market.

34



As noted above, most of the leases with our largest tenant, the United States Government, provide for consecutive one-year terms or provide for early termination rights; all of the leasing statistics set forth above assume that the United States Government will remain in the space that they lease through the end of the respective arrangements, without ending consecutive one-year leases prematurely or exercising early termination rights.

Wholesale Data Center Property
 
Our wholesale data center property, which upon completion is expected to have a critical load of 18 megawatts, had six megawatts in operation at December 31, 2012, of which four were leased to tenants with further expansion rights of up to a combined five megawatts. This leasing includes our completion in 2012 of a new lease that provides for an initial commitment of one megawatt with further expansion rights for one additional megawatt, which was our first lease for the property since its acquisition in 2010. We expect that leasing of this property could continue to be slow, and expect, due to the long lease commencement lead time required for this type of property, that any new leasing completed in 2013 will contribute minimally to our income for that year. We plan to hold this property long-term. However, if our strategic plan for this property changes, we could recognize a significant impairment charge.

Results of Operations
 
We evaluate the operating performance of our properties using NOI from real estate operations, our segment performance measure derived by subtracting property operating expenses from revenues from real estate operations.  We view our NOI from real estate operations as comprising the following primary categories of operating properties:
 
•
office properties owned and 100% operational throughout the two years being compared, excluding operating properties disposed or held for future disposition.  We define these as changes from “Same Office Properties.” For further discussion of the concept of “operational,” you should refer to the section of Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements entitled “Properties”;
•
office properties acquired during the two years being compared;
•
constructed office properties placed into service that were not 100% operational throughout the two years being compared;
•
office properties held for sale as of December 31, 2012;
•
office properties in the Greater Philadelphia region. In September 2012, we shortened the holding period for these properties because they no longer meet our strategic investment criteria; and
•
property dispositions.

You may refer to Note 17 of the consolidated financial statements for a summary of operating properties that were either disposed or classified as held for sale and therefore are included in discontinued operations.
 
In addition to owning properties, we provide construction management and other services. The primary manner in which we evaluate the operating performance of our construction management and other service activities is through a measure we define as NOI from service operations, which is based on the net of the revenues and expenses from these activities.  The revenues and expenses from these activities consist primarily of subcontracted costs that are reimbursed to us by customers along with a management fee.  The operating margins from these activities are small relative to the revenue.  We believe NOI from service operations is a useful measure in assessing both our level of activity and our profitability in conducting such operations.
 
We believe that operating income, as reported on our consolidated statements of operations, is the most directly comparable generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) measure for both NOI from real estate operations and NOI from service operations.  Since both of these measures exclude certain items includable in operating income, reliance on these measures has limitations; management compensates for these limitations by using the measures simply as supplemental measures that are considered alongside other GAAP and non-GAAP measures.


35


The table below reconciles NOI from real estate operations and NOI from service operations to operating income reported on our consolidated statement of operations:
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
(in thousands)
NOI from real estate operations
 
$
312,365

 
$
308,012

 
$
288,959

NOI from service operations
 
3,260

 
2,706

 
2,373

NOI from discontinued operations
 
(25,355
)
 
(41,913
)
 
(48,017
)
Depreciation and amortization associated with real estate operations
 
(113,480
)
 
(113,111
)
 
(97,897
)
Impairment losses
 
(43,214
)
 
(83,478
)
 
—

General, administrative and leasing expenses
 
(31,900
)
 
(30,314
)
 
(28,501
)
Business development expenses and land carry costs
 
(5,711
)
 
(6,122
)
 
(6,403
)
Operating income
 
$
95,965

 
$
35,780

 
$
110,514


Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2012 to the Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
Variance
 
(in thousands)
Revenues
 

 
 

 
 

Revenues from real estate operations
$
454,171

 
$
428,496

 
$
25,675

Construction contract and other service revenues
73,836

 
84,345

 
(10,509
)
Total revenues
528,007

 
512,841

 
15,166

Expenses
 

 
 

 
 

Property operating expenses
167,161

 
162,397

 
4,764

Depreciation and amortization associated with real estate operations
113,480

 
113,111

 
369

Construction contract and other service expenses
70,576

 
81,639

 
(11,063
)
Impairment losses
43,214

 
83,478

 
(40,264
)
General, administrative and leasing expenses
31,900

 
30,314

 
1,586

Business development expenses and land carry costs
5,711

 
6,122

 
(411
)
Total operating expenses
432,042

 
477,061

 
(45,019
)
Operating income
95,965

 
35,780

 
60,185

Interest expense
(94,624
)
 
(98,222
)
 
3,598

Interest and other income
7,172

 
5,603

 
1,569

Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(943
)
 
(1,639
)
 
696

Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities
(546
)
 
(331
)
 
(215
)
Income tax (expense) benefit
(381
)
 
6,710

 
(7,091
)
Loss on interest rate derivatives
—

 
(29,805
)
 
29,805

Income (loss) from continuing operations
6,643

 
(81,904
)
 
88,547

Discontinued operations
13,677

 
(48,404
)
 
62,081

Gain on sales of real estate, net of income taxes
21

 
2,732

 
(2,711
)
Net income (loss)
20,341

 
(127,576
)
 
147,917

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
636

 
8,148

 
(7,512
)
Preferred share dividends
(20,844
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(4,742
)
Issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares
(1,827
)
 
—

 
(1,827
)
Net loss attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
(1,694
)
 
$
(135,530
)
 
$
133,836



36


NOI from Real Estate Operations
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
Variance
 
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per square foot data)
Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Same Office Properties
 
$
414,275

 
$
404,617

 
$
9,658

Constructed office properties placed in service
 
16,237

 
8,593

 
7,644

Acquired office properties
 
6,574

 
1,368

 
5,206

Properties held for sale
 
19,529

 
18,584

 
945

Greater Philadelphia properties
 
9,698

 
7,458

 
2,240

Dispositions
 
19,957

 
50,149

 
(30,192
)
Other
 
6,830

 
5,063

 
1,767

 
 
493,100

 
495,832

 
(2,732
)
Property operating expenses
 
 

 
 

 
 

Same Office Properties
 
151,932

 
150,198

 
1,734

Constructed office properties placed in service
 
4,040

 
1,791

 
2,249

Acquired office properties
 
1,450

 
227

 
1,223

Properties held for sale
 
6,671

 
6,292

 
379

Greater Philadelphia properties
 
2,562

 
1,402

 
1,160

Dispositions
 
9,057

 
24,448

 
(15,391
)
Other
 
5,023

 
3,462

 
1,561

 
 
180,735

 
187,820

 
(7,085
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOI from real estate operations
 
 

 
 

 
 

Same Office Properties
 
262,343

 
254,419

 
7,924

Constructed office properties placed in service
 
12,197

 
6,802

 
5,395

Acquired office properties
 
5,124

 
1,141

 
3,983

Properties held for sale
 
12,858

 
12,292

 
566

Greater Philadelphia properties
 
7,136

 
6,056

 
1,080

Dispositions
 
10,900

 
25,701

 
(14,801
)
Other
 
1,807

 
1,601

 
206

 
 
$
312,365

 
$
308,012

 
$
4,353

Same Office Properties rent statistics
 
 

 
 

 
 

Average occupancy rate
 
88.6
%
 
89.1
%
 
-0.5
 %
Average straight-line rent per occupied square foot (1)
 
$
23.57

 
$
23.35

 
$
0.22

 
(1) 
Includes minimum base rents, net of abatements, and lease incentives on a straight-line basis for the years set forth above.
 
The increase in revenues from our Same Office Properties was attributable to a $4.5 million increase in rental revenue (including $967,000 in connection with lease terminations) and a $5.2 million increase in tenant recoveries and other real estate operations revenue (most of which pertained to an increase in directly reimbursable expenses). The increase in property operating expenses from our Same Office Properties was primarily due to increases in expenses directly reimbursable from tenants, offset in part by decreases in snow removal and utility expenses resulting from a milder winter and spring in the Mid-Atlantic region.

Our Same Office Properties pool for purposes of comparing 2012 and 2011 consisted of 177 office properties, comprising 84.0% of our operating office square footage as of December 31, 2012. This pool of properties included the following changes from the pool used for purposes of comparing 2011 and 2010: the addition of four properties acquired and fully operational by January 1, 2011; and five properties placed in service and 100% operational by January 1, 2011. Operating office properties disposed, held for sale or otherwise no longer held for long-term investment (currently our Greater Philadelphia properties) by December 31, 2012 were also excluded from all presented Same Office Property pools.


37


NOI from Service Operations

 
 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
Variance
 
 
(in thousands)
Construction contract and other service revenues
 
$
73,836

 
$
84,345

 
$
(10,509
)
Construction contract and other service expenses
 
70,576

 
81,639

 
(11,063
)
NOI from service operations
 
$
3,260

 
$
2,706

 
$
554


Construction contract and other service revenue and expenses decreased due primarily to a lower volume of construction activity in connection with one large construction contract that was nearing completion. Construction contract activity is inherently subject to significant variability depending on the volume and nature of projects undertaken by us (primarily on behalf of tenants). Service operations are an ancillary component of our overall operations that should contribute little operating income relative to our real estate operations.

Impairment Losses
 
We recognized the impairment losses described below in the current and prior years:

•
in September 2012, our Board of Trustees approved a plan by Management to shorten the holding period for all of our office properties and developable land in Greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania because the properties no longer meet our strategic investment criteria. We determined that the carrying amounts of these properties will not likely be recovered from the cash flows from the operations and sales of such properties over the likely remaining holding period. Accordingly, in 2012, we recognized aggregate non-cash impairment losses of $46.1 million for the amounts by which the carrying values of the properties exceeded their respective estimated fair values;
•
in connection primarily with the Strategic Reallocation Plan, we determined that the carrying amounts of certain properties identified for disposition (the “Impaired Properties”) will not likely be recovered from the cash flows from the operations and sales of such properties over the shorter holding periods.  Accordingly, we recognized aggregate impairment losses for the amounts by which the carrying values of the Impaired Properties exceeded their respective estimated fair values, plus any exit costs incurred, of: $19.0 million in 2012 ($23.7 million classified as discontinued operations and including $4.2 million in exit costs); and $122.5 million in 2011 ($67.5 million classified as discontinued operations and excluding $4.8 million in related income tax benefit);
•
in connection with construction costs incurred on a property held for future development, we recognized an impairment loss of $1.9 million in 2012;
•
on February 15 and 17, 2011, the United States Army (the “Army”) provided us disclosures regarding the past testing and use of tactical defoliants/herbicides at a property we owned, and subsequently disposed of, in Cascade, Maryland that was formerly an Army base known as Fort Ritchie (“Fort Ritchie”).  Upon receipt of these disclosures, we commenced a review of our development plans and prospects for the property.  We believed that these disclosures by the Army were likely to cause further delays in the resolution of certain litigation related to the property, and that they also increased the level of uncertainty as to our ultimate development rights at the property and future residential and commercial demand for the property.  We analyzed various possible outcomes and resulting cash flows expected from the operations and ultimate disposition of the property.  After determining that the carrying amount of the property was not likely to be recovered from those cash flows, we recognized a non-cash impairment loss of $27.7 million in March 2011 for the amount by which the carrying value of the property exceeded its estimated fair value; and
•
$803,000 on goodwill associated with operating properties in 2011.

The table below sets forth impairment losses (recoveries) recognized by property classification:
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
(in thousands)
Operating properties
$
70,263

 
$
70,512

Non-operating properties
(3,353
)
 
80,509

Total
$
66,910

 
$
151,021

 

38


The timely disposition of assets that no longer meet our strategic objectives is a key component of our strategy. Our identification of additional properties for disposition in future periods could result in our recognition of additional impairment losses in such periods.

General, Administrative and Leasing Expenses

In 2012, we incurred additional expenses in connection with certain staffing reductions made to adjust the size of the organization due in large part to our property dispositions. In 2011, certain of our executives voluntarily cancelled performance share units (“PSUs”) that were originally granted to them in 2010; we recognized a non-cash compensation charge of $1.2 million in 2011 in connection with these PSU cancellations, most of which was included in general, administrative and leasing expenses, and we will have no further compensation charges in the future in connection with the cancelled PSUs.

We capitalize compensation and indirect costs associated with properties, or portions thereof, undergoing construction, development and redevelopment activities, and also capitalize such costs associated with internal-use software development. We also capitalize compensation costs associated with obtaining new tenant leases or extending existing tenants. Capitalized compensation and indirect costs were as follows:
 
 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
(in thousands)
Construction, development, redevelopment, capital and tenant improvements
 
$
7,976

 
$
10,394

Leasing
 
1,151

 
1,259

Total
 
$
9,127

 
$
11,653


The decrease in capitalized compensation and indirect costs from 2011 to 2012 was attributable in large part to a lower level of construction and development activity.

Interest Expense

The table below sets forth the components of our interest expense included in continuing operations:
 
 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
Variance
 
 
(in thousands)
Interest on mortgage and other secured loans
 
$
63,124

 
$
75,760

 
$
(12,636
)
Interest on unsecured term loans
 
14,728

 
2,914

 
11,814

Interest on Exchangeable Senior Notes
 
13,851

 
20,267

 
(6,416
)
Interest on Revolving Credit Facility
 
6,274

 
10,158

 
(3,884
)
Interest expense recognized on interest rate swaps
 
3,697

 
4,600

 
(903
)
Amortization of deferred financing costs
 
6,243

 
6,596

 
(353
)
Other interest
 
2,784

 
1,406

 
1,378

Interest expense reclassified to discontinued operations
 
(2,174
)
 
(6,079
)
 
3,905

Capitalized interest
 
(13,903
)
 
(17,400
)
 
3,497

Total
 
$
94,624

 
$
98,222

 
$
(3,598
)

The decrease in interest expense included the effect of a $132.8 million decrease in our average outstanding debt resulting primarily from our repayments of debt using proceeds from property dispositions and equity issuances. Capitalized interest decreased from 2011 to 2012 due primarily to a decrease in the average costs associated with active construction projects resulting from projects being completed and our being slower to start new projects prior to definitive leasing being in place.

Loss on Interest Rate Swaps

On April 5, 2011, we entered into two forward starting LIBOR swaps for an aggregate notional amount of $175 million designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments on ten-year, fixed-rate borrowings forecasted to occur between August 2011 and April 2012.  After meeting with our Board of Trustees on December 21, 2011, we determined that we would pursue other financing options and concluded that the originally forecasted borrowings were expected not to occur.  Accordingly, the swaps no longer qualified for hedge accounting and we recognized an aggregate loss of $29.8 million on these interest rate swaps in December 2011, most of which was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive losses at the time

39


the swaps entered into on April 5, 2011 no longer qualified for hedge accounting. On January 5, 2012, we cash settled all of the forward starting swaps entered into on April 5, 2011 and December 22, 2011 for an aggregate of $29.7 million using borrowings from our Revolving Credit Facility.

Discontinued Operations
 
The increase in discontinued operations from 2011 to 2012 was due primarily to a $43.8 million decrease in impairment losses and a $16.1 million increase in gain on sales in the current period primarily in connection with the Strategic Reallocation Plan.

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit

The income tax benefit in 2011 was due primarily to a $4.8 million benefit on impairment losses recognized by our taxable REIT subsidiary in connection with the Strategic Reallocation Plan, most of which was recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Preferred Share Dividends

The increase in preferred share dividends was due to dividends on the newly issued Series L Preferred Shares, partially offset by the decrease in dividends attributable to the Series G Preferred Shares redeemed on August 2012.

Issuance Costs Associated With Redeemed Preferred Shares

In 2012, we recognized a $1.8 million decrease to net income available to common shareholders pertaining to the original issuance costs incurred on the Series G Preferred Shares that were redeemed.

Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Interests in our Operating Partnership are in the form of preferred and common units. The line entitled net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests includes primarily loss or income allocated to preferred and common units not owned by us. Income is allocated to noncontrolling preferred unitholders in an amount equal to the priority return from the Operating Partnership to which they are entitled. Income and losses are allocated to noncontrolling common unitholders based on income earned by the Operating Partnership, after allocation to preferred unitholders, multiplied by the percentage of the common units in the Operating Partnership owned by those common unitholders.

The net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests changed due primarily to the increase in net income available to allocate to noncontrolling holders of common units in the Operating Partnership primarily resulting from the reasons set forth above.


40


Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2011 to the Year Ended December 31, 2010
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
(in thousands)
Revenues
 

 
 

 
 

Revenues from real estate operations
$
428,496

 
$
387,559

 
$
40,937

Construction contract and other service revenues
84,345

 
104,675

 
(20,330
)
Total revenues
512,841

 
492,234

 
20,607

Expenses
 

 
 

 
 

Property operating expenses
162,397

 
146,617

 
15,780

Depreciation and amortization associated with real estate operations
113,111

 
97,897

 
15,214

Construction contract and other service expenses
81,639

 
102,302

 
(20,663
)
Impairment losses
83,478

 
—

 
83,478

General, administrative and leasing expense
30,314

 
28,501

 
1,813

Business development expenses and land carry costs
6,122

 
6,403

 
(281
)
Total operating expenses
477,061

 
381,720

 
95,341

Operating income
35,780

 
110,514

 
(74,734
)
Interest expense
(98,222
)
 
(95,729
)
 
(2,493
)
Interest and other income
5,603

 
9,568

 
(3,965
)
Loss on interest rate derivatives
(29,805
)
 
—

 
(29,805
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(1,639
)
 
—

 
(1,639
)
Equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated entities
(331
)
 
1,376

 
(1,707
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
6,710

 
(108
)
 
6,818

(Loss) income from continuing operations
(81,904
)
 
25,621

 
(107,525
)
Discontinued operations
(48,404
)
 
17,054

 
(65,458
)
Gain on sales of real estate, net of income taxes
2,732

 
2,829

 
(97
)
Net (loss) income
(127,576
)
 
45,504

 
(173,080
)
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
8,148

 
(2,744
)
 
10,892

Preferred share dividends
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
 
—

Net (loss) income attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
(135,530
)
 
$
26,658

 
$
(162,188
)


41


NOI from Real Estate Operations
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per square foot data)
Revenues
 

 
 

 
 

Same Office Properties
$
362,237

 
$
362,853

 
$
(616
)
Constructed office properties placed in service
27,048

 
8,789

 
18,259

Acquired office properties
25,293

 
7,315

 
17,978

Properties held for sale
18,584

 
18,704

 
(120
)
Greater Philadelphia properties
7,458

 
6,299

 
1,159

Dispositions
50,149

 
56,706

 
(6,557
)
Other
5,063

 
1,062

 
4,001

 
495,832

 
461,728

 
34,104

Property operating expenses
 

 
 

 
 

Same Office Properties
137,286

 
132,768

 
4,518

Constructed office properties placed in service
5,705

 
1,993

 
3,712

Acquired office properties
9,225

 
2,317

 
6,908

Properties held for sale
6,292

 
5,831

 
461

Greater Philadelphia properties
1,402

 
2,131

 
(729
)
Dispositions
24,448

 
25,974

 
(1,526
)
Other
3,462

 
1,755

 
1,707

 
187,820

 
172,769

 
15,051

NOI from real estate operations
 

 
 

 
 

Same Office Properties
224,951

 
230,085

 
(5,134
)
Constructed office properties placed in service
21,343

 
6,796

 
14,547

Acquired office properties
16,068

 
4,998

 
11,070

Properties held for sale
12,292

 
12,873

 
(581
)
Greater Philadelphia properties
6,056

 
4,168

 
1,888

Dispositions
25,701

 
30,732

 
(5,031
)
Other
1,601

 
(693
)
 
2,294

 
$
308,012

 
$
288,959

 
$
19,053

Same Office Properties rent statistics
 

 
 

 
 

Average occupancy rate
88.6
%
 
90.2
%
 
(1.6
)%
Average straight-line rent per occupied square foot (1)
$
22.50

 
$
22.26

 
$
0.24


(1) 
Includes minimum base rents, net of abatements, and lease incentives on a straight-line basis for the nine month periods set forth above.

As the table above indicates, our increase in NOI from real estate operations was attributable to the additions of properties through construction and acquisition activities.

Our Same Office Properties for purposes of comparing 2011 and 2010 consisted of 168 office properties, comprising 70.8% of our operating office square footage as of December 31, 2011. With regard to changes in NOI from real estate operations attributable to Same Office Properties:

•
the decrease in revenues included the following:
•
a $2.3 million decrease in rental revenue attributable primarily to changes in occupancy and rental rates between the two years; and
•
a $1.5 million decrease in net revenue from the early termination of leases; offset in part by
•
a $3.2 million increase in tenant recoveries and other revenue due primarily to the increase in property operating expenses described below.

•
the increase in property operating expenses included the following:
•
a $1.9 million increase in costs for asset and property management labor, much of which was due to an increase in the size of our employee base supporting certain properties;
•
a $1.7 million increase in interior and other repairs and maintenance;

42


•
a $1.5 million increase in heating and air conditioning repairs and maintenance that was predominantly attributable to an increase in heating and air conditioning systems utilization at a property in San Antonio; and
•
a $1.0 million increase in cleaning services and related supplies due in large part to increased contract rates and increased space usage of leased space at certain properties; offset in part by
•
a $3.5 million decrease in snow removal expenses due primarily to record snowfall in Maryland and Northern Virginia in 2010.

NOI from Service Operations
 
 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Construction contract and other service revenues
 
$
84,345

 
$
104,675

 
$
(20,330
)
 
Construction contract and other service expenses
 
81,639

 
102,302

 
(20,663
)
 
NOI from service operations
 
$
2,706

 
$
2,373

 
$
333

 

As evidenced in the changes set forth above, construction contract and other service revenue and expenses decreased due primarily to a lower volume of construction activity in connection with one large construction contract that was nearing completion, although the change in NOI from service operations was not significant.

Depreciation and Amortization Associated with Real Estate Operations

Depreciation and amortization expense associated with real estate included in continuing operations increased due primarily to expense attributable to properties added into operations through construction and acquisition activities.
General, Administrative and Leasing Expenses

As described above, we recognized a non-cash compensation charge of $1.2 million in 2011 in connection with voluntary executive PSU cancellations, most of which was included in general, administrative and leasing expenses.

Capitalized compensation and indirect costs were as follows:
 
 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2011
 
2010
 
 
(in thousands)
Construction, development, redevelopment, capital and tenant improvements
 
$
10,394

 
$
9,684

Leasing
 
1,259

 
1,222

Internal-use software development
 
—

 
126

Total
 
$
11,653

 
$
11,032


Impairment Losses
 
We recognized impairment losses in 2011, as described above.


43


Interest Expense

The table below sets forth the components of our interest expense included in continuing operations:
 
 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
 
(in thousands)
Interest on mortgage and other secured loans
 
$
75,760

 
$
82,635

 
$
(6,875
)
Interest on Exchangeable Senior Notes
 
20,267

 
19,348

 
919

Interest on Revolving Credit Facility
 
10,158

 
5,923

 
4,235

Interest expense recognized on interest rate swaps
 
4,600

 
3,689

 
911

Interest on unsecured term loans
 
2,914

 
—

 
2,914

Amortization of deferred financing costs
 
6,596

 
5,871

 
725

Other interest
 
1,406

 
1,186

 
220

Interest expense reclassified to discontinued operations
 
(6,079
)
 
(6,399
)
 
320

Capitalized interest
 
(17,400
)
 
(16,524
)
 
(876
)
Total
 
$
98,222

 
$
95,729

 
$
2,493


The increase in interest expense included the effect of a $181.4 million increase in our average outstanding debt resulting primarily from our financing of acquisition and construction activities. The table above reflects the effects of our repayments of secured debt and our maintaining a higher weighted average borrowing level on the Revolving Credit Facility in 2011.

Loss on Interest Rate Swaps

As described above, we recognized an aggregate loss of $29.8 million on certain forward starting interest rate swaps in December 2011, most of which was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive losses.

Interest and Other Income

The decrease in interest and other income was due primarily to a decrease in gain recognized on our investment in common stock of The KEYW Holding Corporation (“KEYW”), an entity supporting the intelligence community's operations and transformation to Cyber Age mission by providing engineering services and integrated platforms that support the intelligence process.  We used the equity method of accounting for our investment in KEYW common stock until the resignation of our Chief Executive Officer from the Board of Directors of KEYW effective July 1, 2011, at which time we began accounting for our investment in KEYW's common stock as a trading marketable equity security to be reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized through earnings. Most of the decrease in gain was attributable to additional equity issued by KEYW in connection with its initial public offering of common stock in 2010; no similar event occurred in 2011.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

As described above, the income tax benefit in 2011 was due primarily to impairment losses recognized by our taxable REIT subsidiary in connection with the Strategic Reallocation Plan.

Discontinued Operations

The decrease in discontinued operations was due primarily to $67.5 million in impairment losses recognized in connection with the Strategic Reallocation Plan described above.

Net Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

The net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests changed due primarily to the decrease in net income available to allocate to noncontrolling holders of common units in the Operating Partnership primarily resulting from the reasons set forth above.


44


Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) Interest Coverage Ratio and Adjusted EBITDA Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio

Adjusted EBITDA is net (loss) income adjusted for the effects of interest expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment losses, gain on sales of properties, gain or loss on early extinguishment of debt, net gain on unconsolidated entities, operating property acquisition costs, loss on interest rate derivatives and income taxes. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is a useful supplemental measure for assessing our un-levered performance. We believe that net (loss) income, as reported on our consolidated statements of operations, is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA excludes items that are included in net income, including some that require cash outlays; we compensate for this limitation by using the measure simply as a supplemental measure that is considered alongside other GAAP and non-GAAP measures. It should not be used as an alternative to net income when evaluating our financial performance or to cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities when evaluating our liquidity or ability to make cash distributions or pay debt service.

We use Adjusted EBITDA to calculate Adjusted EBITDA Interest Coverage Ratio and Adjusted EBITDA Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. We calculate Adjusted EBITDA interest coverage by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by interest expense on continuing and discontinued operations (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs and amortization of debt discounts and premiums, net of amounts capitalized). We calculate Adjusted EBITDA fixed charge coverage ratio by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by the sum of: (1) interest expense on continuing and discontinued operations (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs and amortization of debt discounts and premiums, net of amounts capitalized); (2) dividends on preferred shares; and (3) distributions on preferred units in the Operating Partnership not owned by us.

The tables below set forth the computation of our Adjusted EBITDA interest and fixed charge coverage ratios and reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA to net income reported on our consolidated statements of operations:
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income (loss)
 
$
20,341

 
$
(127,576
)
 
$
45,504

Interest expense (1)
 
96,798

 
104,301

 
102,128

Income tax expense (benefit) (2)
 
381

 
(6,710
)
 
119

Depreciation and amortization (1)
 
124,418

 
136,594

 
125,819

Impairment losses (1)
 
66,910

 
151,021

 
—

(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt (1)
 
(793
)
 
2,023

 
—

Gain on sales of operating properties
 
(20,928
)
 
(4,811
)
 
(1,077
)
Non-operating property sales
 
(33
)
 
(2,717
)
 
(2,840
)
Net gain on investments in unconsolidated entities included in interest and other income
 
(3,589
)
 
(1,820
)
 
(6,408
)
Operating property acquisition costs
 
229

 
156

 
3,424

Loss on interest rate swaps
 
—

 
29,805

 
—

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
283,734

 
$
280,266

 
$
266,669

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense (1)
 
$
96,798

 
$
104,301

 
$
102,128

Less: Amortization of deferred financing costs
 
(6,243
)
 
(6,596
)
 
(5,871
)
Less: Amortization of net debt discounts and premiums, net of amounts capitalized
 
(2,721
)
 
(4,680
)
 
(4,974
)
Denominator for Adjusted EBITDA interest coverage ratio
 
$
87,834

 
$
93,025

 
$
91,283

Preferred share dividends
 
20,844

 
16,102

 
16,102

Preferred distributions
 
660

 
660

 
660

Denominator for Adjusted EBITDA fixed charge coverage ratio
 
$
109,338

 
$
109,787

 
$
108,045

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA interest coverage ratio
 
3.23x

 
3.01x

 
2.92x

Adjusted EBITDA fixed charge coverage ratio
 
2.60x

 
2.55x

 
2.47x

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Includes amounts included in continuing operations and discontinued operations.
 
 
(2) Includes income taxes on continuing operations and gains on sales of real estate.
 
 
 
 
 
 


45


Funds from Operations
 
Funds from operations (“FFO”) is defined as net (loss) income computed using GAAP, excluding gains on sales of, and impairment losses on, previously depreciated operating properties, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization. When multiple properties consisting of both operating and non-operating properties exist on a single tax parcel, we classify all of the gains on sales of, and impairment losses on, the tax parcel as all being for previously depreciated operating properties when most of the value of the parcel is associated with operating properties on the parcel. We believe that we use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition of FFO, although others may interpret the definition differently and, accordingly, our presentation of FFO may differ from those of other REITs.  We believe that FFO is useful to management and investors as a supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains related to sales of, and impairment losses on, previously depreciated operating properties, net of related tax benefit, and excluding real estate-related depreciation and amortization, FFO can help one compare our operating performance between periods.  In addition, since most equity REITs provide FFO information to the investment community, we believe that FFO is useful to investors as a supplemental measure for comparing our results to those of other equity REITs.  We believe that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO.
 
Since FFO excludes certain items includable in net income, reliance on the measure has limitations; management compensates for these limitations by using the measure simply as a supplemental measure that is weighed in the balance with other GAAP and non-GAAP measures. FFO is not necessarily an indication of our cash flow available to fund cash needs.  Additionally, it should not be used as an alternative to net income when evaluating our financial performance or to cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities when evaluating our liquidity or ability to make cash distributions or pay debt service.
 
Basic FFO available to common share and common unit holders (“Basic FFO”) is FFO adjusted to subtract (1) preferred share dividends, (2) issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares, (3) income attributable to noncontrolling interests through ownership of preferred units in the Operating Partnership or interests in other consolidated entities not owned by us, (4) depreciation and amortization allocable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities and (5) Basic FFO allocable to restricted shares.  With these adjustments, Basic FFO represents FFO available to common shareholders and common unitholders.  Common units in the Operating Partnership are substantially similar to our common shares and are exchangeable into common shares, subject to certain conditions.  We believe that Basic FFO is useful to investors due to the close correlation of common units to common shares.  We believe that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Basic FFO.  Basic FFO has essentially the same limitations as FFO; management compensates for these limitations in essentially the same manner as described above for FFO.
 
Diluted FFO available to common share and common unit holders (“Diluted FFO”) is Basic FFO adjusted to add back any changes in Basic FFO that would result from the assumed conversion of securities that are convertible or exchangeable into common shares.  We believe that Diluted FFO is useful to investors because it is the numerator used to compute Diluted FFO per share, discussed below.  We believe that the numerator for diluted EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Diluted FFO.  Since Diluted FFO excludes certain items includable in the numerator to diluted EPS, reliance on the measure has limitations; management compensates for these limitations by using the measure simply as a supplemental measure that is weighed in the balance with other GAAP and non-GAAP measures.  Diluted FFO is not necessarily an indication of our cash flow available to fund cash needs.  Additionally, it should not be used as an alternative to net income when evaluating our financial performance or to cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities when evaluating our liquidity or ability to make cash distributions or pay debt service.
 
Diluted FFO, as adjusted for comparability is defined as Diluted FFO adjusted to exclude operating property acquisition costs, gains on sales of, and impairment losses on, properties other than previously depreciated operating properties, net of associated income tax, gain or loss on early extinguishment of debt, loss on interest rate swaps and issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares.  We believe that the excluded items are not reflective of normal operations and, as a result, we believe that a measure that excludes these items is a useful supplemental measure in evaluating our operating performance.  We believe that the numerator to diluted EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to this non-GAAP measure.  This measure has essentially the same limitations as Diluted FFO, as well as the further limitation of not reflecting the effects of the excluded items; we compensate for these limitations in essentially the same manner as described above for Diluted FFO.
 
Diluted FFO per share is (1) Diluted FFO divided by (2) the sum of the (a) weighted average common shares outstanding during a period, (b) weighted average common units outstanding during a period and (c) weighted average number of potential additional common shares that would have been outstanding during a period if other securities that are convertible or exchangeable into common shares were converted or exchanged.  We believe that Diluted FFO per share is useful to investors because it provides investors with a further context for evaluating our FFO results in the same manner that investors use

46


earnings per share (“EPS”) in evaluating net income available to common shareholders.  In addition, since most equity REITs provide Diluted FFO per share information to the investment community, we believe that Diluted FFO per share is a useful supplemental measure for comparing us to other equity REITs. We believe that diluted EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Diluted FFO per share. Diluted FFO per share has most of the same limitations as Diluted FFO (described above); management compensates for these limitations in essentially the same manner as described above for Diluted FFO.
 
Diluted FFO per share, as adjusted for comparability is (1) Diluted FFO, as adjusted for comparability divided by (2) the sum of the (a) weighted average common shares outstanding during a period, (b) weighted average common units outstanding during a period and (c) weighted average number of potential additional common shares that would have been outstanding during a period if other securities that are convertible or exchangeable into common shares were converted or exchanged.  We believe that this measure is useful to investors because it provides investors with a further context for evaluating our FFO results.  We believe that diluted EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to this per share measure.  This measure has most of the same limitations as Diluted FFO (described above) as well as the further limitation of not reflecting the effects of the excluded items; we compensate for these limitations in essentially the same manner as described above for Diluted FFO.
 
The computations for all of the above measures on a diluted basis assume the conversion of common units in our Operating Partnership but do not assume the conversion of other securities that are convertible into common shares if the conversion of those securities would increase per share measures in a given period.

We use measures called payout ratios as supplemental measures of our ability to make distributions to investors based on each of the following: FFO; Diluted FFO; and Diluted FFO, adjusted for comparability. These measures are defined as (1) the sum of (a) dividends on common shares and (b) distributions to holders of interests in the Operating Partnership and dividends on convertible preferred shares when such distributions and dividends are included in Diluted FFO divided by either (2) FFO, Diluted FFO or Diluted FFO, adjusted for comparability.


47


The tables appearing below and on the following page sets forth the computation of the above stated measures for the years ended December 31, 2008 through 2012 and provides reconciliations to the GAAP measures associated with such measures: 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011

 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
 
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Net income (loss)
$
20,341

 
$
(127,576
)
 
$
45,504

 
$
61,299

 
$
61,316

Add: Real estate-related depreciation and amortization
121,937

 
134,131

 
123,243

 
109,386

 
102,772

Add: Depreciation and amortization on unconsolidated real estate entities allocable to COPT (1)
346

 
492

 
631

 
640

 
648

Add: Impairment losses on previously depreciated operating properties
70,263

 
70,512

 
—

 
—

 
—

Less: Gain on sales of previously depreciated operating properties, net of income taxes
(20,928
)
 
(4,811
)
 
(1,077
)
 
—

 
(2,630
)
FFO
191,959

 
72,748

 
168,301

 
171,325

 
162,106

Less: Noncontrolling interests-preferred units in the Operating Partnership
(660
)
 
(660
)
 
(660
)
 
(660
)
 
(660
)
Less: FFO allocable to other noncontrolling interests
(1,989
)
 
(1,887
)
 
(1,370
)
 
(308
)
 
(442
)
Less: Preferred share dividends
(20,844
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
Less: Issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares
(1,827
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Basic and Diluted FFO allocable to restricted shares
(919
)
 
(1,037
)
 
(1,524
)
 
(1,629
)
 
(1,310
)
Basic and Diluted FFO
$
165,720

 
$
53,062

 
$
148,645

 
$
152,626

 
$
143,592

Operating property acquisition costs
229

 
156

 
3,424

 
1,967

 
—

Gain on sales of non-operating properties, net of income taxes
(33
)
 
(2,717
)
 
(2,829
)
 
—

 
(988
)
Impairment (recoveries) losses on other properties
(3,353
)
 
80,509

 
—

 
—

 
—

Income tax expense on impairment recoveries (losses) on other properties
673

 
(4,775
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Loss on interest rate derivatives
—

 
29,805

 
—

 
—

 
—

(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt
(793
)
 
2,023

 


 


 
(8,026
)
Issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares
1,827

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Diluted FFO, as adjusted for comparability
$
164,270

 
$
158,063

 
$
149,240

 
$
154,593

 
$
134,578

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares
73,454

 
69,382

 
59,611

 
55,930

 
48,132

Conversion of weighted average common units
4,235

 
4,355

 
4,608

 
5,717

 
8,107

Weighted average common shares/units - Basic FFO
77,689

 
73,737

 
64,219

 
61,647

 
56,239

Dilutive effect of share-based compensation awards
53

 
111

 
333

 
477

 
688

Weighted average common shares/units - Diluted FFO
77,742

 
73,848

 
64,552

 
62,124

 
56,927

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted FFO per share
$
2.13

 
$
0.72

 
$
2.30

 
$
2.46

 
$
2.52

Diluted FFO per share, as adjusted for comparability
$
2.11

 
$
2.14

 
$
2.31

 
$
2.49

 
$
2.36

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

48


 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011

 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
 
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Numerator for diluted EPS
$
(2,163
)
 
$
(136,567
)
 
$
25,587

 
$
39,217

 
$
37,135

Add: Income allocable to noncontrolling interests-common units in the Operating Partnership
(87
)
 
(8,439
)
 
2,116

 
4,495

 
6,519

Add: Real estate-related depreciation and amortization
121,937

 
134,131

 
123,243

 
109,386

 
102,772

Add: Depreciation and amortization of unconsolidated real estate entities
346

 
492

 
631

 
640

 
648

Add: Impairment losses on previously depreciated operating properties
70,263

 
70,512

 
—

 
—

 
—

Add: Numerator for diluted EPS allocable to restricted shares
469

 
1,037

 
1,071

 
1,010

 
728

Less: Depreciation and amortization allocable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities
(633
)
 
(849
)
 
(1,402
)
 
(493
)
 
(270
)
Less: Decrease in noncontrolling interests unrelated to earnings
(2,565
)
 
(1,407
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Less: Basic and diluted FFO allocable to restricted shares
(919
)
 
(1,037
)
 
(1,524
)
 
(1,629
)
 
(1,310
)
Less: Gain on sales of previously depreciated operating properties, net of income taxes
(20,928
)
 
(4,811
)
 
(1,077
)
 
—

 
(2,630
)
Basic and Diluted FFO
$
165,720

 
$
53,062

 
$
148,645

 
$
152,626

 
$
143,592

Operating property acquisition costs
229

 
156

 
3,424

 
1,967

 
—

Gain on sales of non-operating properties, net of income taxes
(33
)
 
(2,717
)
 
(2,829
)
 
—

 
(988
)
Impairment (recoveries) losses on other properties
(3,353
)
 
80,509

 
—

 
—

 
—

Income tax expense (benefit) on impairment (recoveries) losses on other properties
673

 
(4,775
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Loss on interest rate derivatives
—

 
29,805

 
—

 
—

 
—

(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt
(793
)
 
2,023

 


 


 
(8,026
)
Issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares
1,827

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Diluted FFO, as adjusted for comparability
$
164,270

 
$
158,063

 
$
149,240

 
$
154,593

 
$
134,578

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Denominator for diluted EPS
73,454

 
69,382

 
59,944

 
56,407

 
48,820

Weighted average common units
4,235

 
4,355

 
4,608

 
5,717

 
8,107

Anti-dilutive EPS effect of share-based compensation awards
53

 
111

 
—

 
—

 
—

Denominator for diluted FFO per share measures
77,742

 
73,848

 
64,552

 
62,124

 
56,927

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends on common shares
$
81,720

 
$
116,717

 
$
98,510

 
$
87,596

 
$
70,836

Common unit distributions
4,617

 
7,173

 
7,266

 
7,962

 
11,510

Numerator for diluted FFO payout ratio, adjusted for comparability
$
86,337

 
$
123,890

 
$
105,776

 
$
95,558

 
$
82,346

FFO payout ratio
45.0
%
 
170.3
%
 
62.8
%
 
55.8
%
 
50.8
%
Diluted FFO payout ratio
52.1
%
 
233.5
%
 
71.2
%
 
62.6
%
 
57.3
%
Diluted FFO payout ratio, as adjusted for comparability
52.6
%
 
78.4
%
 
70.9
%
 
61.8
%
 
61.2
%


49


Property Additions
 
The table below sets forth the major components of our additions to properties for 2012 and 2011:
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
Variance
 
(in thousands)
Construction, development and redevelopment (1)
$
165,523

 
$
240,360

 
$
(74,837
)
Acquisition of operating properties (2)
33,684

 
26,887

 
6,797

Tenant improvements on operating properties (3)
22,068

 
47,147

 
(25,079
)
Capital improvements on operating properties
26,827

 
16,572

 
10,255

 
$
248,102

 
$
330,966

 
$
(82,864
)

(1)
The decrease from 2011 to 2012 was attributable in large part to a slowing in the pace of new construction projects started since we were less inclined to commence construction on projects prior to definitive leasing prospects being in place than we were historically. Estimated remaining costs on existing construction projects totaled $134.7 million at December 31, 2012. We also have a significant pipeline of land, much of which we expect to use for the construction of new projects in the future, although the volume and pace of such new projects occurring will be dependent in large part on the leasing environment.
(2)
Excludes intangible assets and liabilities associated with such acquisition. Our level of future acquisitions will be dependent largely on our ability to identify strategic acquisition opportunities that meet our return criteria and our having sufficient capital available to complete such acquisitions.
(3)
Tenant improvement costs incurred on newly-constructed properties are classified in this table as construction, development and redevelopment. The decrease from 2011 to 2012 was due in large part to a decrease in leases executed on existing space in 2012 and 2011 including significant costs from leases executed in 2010.

 Cash Flows
 
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $39.7 million from 2011 to 2012 due primarily to: an increase in cash flow received from real estate operations, which was affected by the timing of cash receipts; an increase in cash flow associated with the timing of cash flow from third-party construction projects; $19.0 million in proceeds in the current period from the sale of our KEYW common stock, including $5.1 million received from sales completed in 2011; and $17.3 million in previously accreted interest paid in the prior period in connection with our repurchase of exchangeable senior notes; offset in part by $29.7 million paid to cash settle interest rate swaps in the current period.
 
Net cash flow provided by investing activities increased $274.1 million from 2011 to 2012 due mostly to a $211.0 million increase from sales of properties primarily in connection with the Strategic Reallocation Plan and lower levels of development spending.
 
Net cash flow used in financing activities in 2012 was $200.5 million and included the following:

•
net repayments of debt of $395.0 million;
•
proceeds from the issuance of common and preferred shares of $371.1 million;
•
payments to redeem the Series G Preferred Shares of $55.0 million; and
•
dividends and distributions of $114.1 million.

Net cash flow provided by financing activities in 2011 was $103.7 million and included the following:

•
net borrowings of $111.4 million;
•
proceeds from the issuance of common shares of $147.8 million; and
•
dividends and distributions of $138.6 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our primary cash requirements are for operating expenses, debt service, development of new properties, improvements to existing properties and acquisitions.  We expect to continue to use cash flow provided by operations as the primary source to meeting our short-term capital needs, including property operating expenses, general and administrative expenses, interest expense, scheduled principal amortization of debt, dividends to our shareholders, distributions to our noncontrolling interest holders of preferred and common units in the Operating Partnership and improvements to existing properties.  We believe that our liquidity and capital resources are adequate for our near-term and longer-term requirements without necessitating property sales.  However, we expect to generate cash by selling properties included in the Strategic Reallocation Plan through 2013.
 

50


We have historically relied on fixed-rate, non-recourse mortgage loans from banks and institutional lenders for long-term financing and to restore availability on our Revolving Credit Facility.  In recent years, we have relied more on unsecured bank loans and publicly issued, convertible unsecured debt for long-term financing.  We also periodically access the public equity markets to raise capital by issuing common and/or preferred shares.
 
We often use our Revolving Credit Facility to initially finance much of our investing activities.  We then pay down the facility using proceeds from long-term borrowings, equity issuances and property sales.  The lenders’ aggregate commitment under the facility is $800 million, with the ability for us to increase the lenders’ aggregate commitment to $1.3 billion, provided that there is no default under the facility and subject to the approval of the lenders. Amounts available under the facility are computed based on 60% of our unencumbered asset value, as defined in the agreement.  The Revolving Credit Facility matures on September 1, 2014, and may be extended by one year at our option, provided that there is no default under the facility and we pay an extension fee of 0.20% of the total availability of the facility.  As of December 31, 2012, the maximum borrowing capacity under this facility totaled $800.0 million, of which $792.3 million was available.

 We also have construction loan facilities that provide for aggregate borrowings of up to $123.8 million, $94.2 million of which was available at December 31, 2012 to fund future construction costs at specific projects.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
 
For the Years Ending December 31,
 
 
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
Thereafter
 
Total
Contractual obligations (1)
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Debt (2)
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Balloon payments due upon maturity
$
111,289

 
$
151,681

 
$
790,254

 
$
274,605

 
$
550,610

 
$
120,011

 
$
1,998,450

Scheduled principal payments
9,840

 
6,660

 
5,548

 
4,037

 
778

 
2,479

 
29,342

Interest on debt (3)
83,414

 
74,071

 
57,850

 
33,759

 
7,436

 
4,725

 
261,255

New construction and redevelopment obligations (4)(5)
54,937

 
10,000

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
64,937

Third-party construction and development obligations (5)(6)
46,180

 
2,430

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
48,610

Capital expenditures for operating properties (5)(7)
16,497

 
5,000

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
21,497

Operating leases (8)
1,177

 
1,162

 
1,040

 
978

 
975

 
81,700

 
87,032

Other purchase obligations (9)
3,150

 
2,029

 
1,088

 
565

 
5

 
98

 
6,935

Total contractual cash obligations
$
326,484

 
$
253,033

 
$
855,780

 
$
313,944

 
$
559,804

 
$
209,013

 
$
2,518,058


(1)
The contractual obligations set forth in this table generally exclude property operations contracts that had a value of less than $20,000.  Also excluded are contracts associated with the operations of our properties that may be terminated with notice of one month or less, which is the arrangement that applies to most of our property operations contracts.
(2)
Represents scheduled principal amortization payments and maturities only and therefore excludes a net discount of $8.6 million. The balloon payment maturities include $17.5 million in 2013 and $411.1 million in 2015 that may each be extended for one year, subject to certain conditions. We expect to refinance the remainder of the balloon payments that are due in 2013 and 2014 using primarily a combination of borrowings under our credit facilities and by accessing the unsecured debt market and/or secured debt market.
(3)
Represents interest costs for debt at December 31, 2012 for the terms of such debt.  For variable rate debt, the amounts reflected above used December 31, 2012 interest rates on variable rate debt in computing interest costs for the terms of such debt.
(4)    Represents contractual obligations pertaining to new construction and redevelopment activities.  Construction and redevelopment activities underway or contractually committed at December 31, 2012 included the following:
Activity
 
Number of Properties
 
Square Feet
(in thousands)
 
Estimated
Remaining Costs(in millions)
 
Expected Year
For Costs to be Incurred Through
Construction of new office properties
 
11
 
1,357
 
$
134.7

 
2015
Redevelopment of existing office properties
 
2
 
297
 
19.3

 
2014
(5)
Due to the long-term nature of certain construction and development contracts and leases included in these lines, the amounts reported in the table represent our estimate of the timing for the related obligations being payable.
(6)  
Represents contractual obligations pertaining to projects for which we are acting as construction manager on behalf of unrelated parties who are our clients.  We expect to be reimbursed in full for these costs by our clients.
(7)
Represents contractual obligations pertaining to recurring and nonrecurring capital expenditures for our operating properties.  We expect to finance these costs primarily using cash flow from operations.
(8) 
We expect to pay these items using cash flow from operations.
(9)
Primarily represents contractual obligations pertaining to managed-energy service contracts in place for certain of our operating properties.  We expect to pay these items using cash flow from operations.
 

51


We expect to spend more than $170.0 million on construction and development costs and approximately $50.0 million on improvements to operating properties (including the commitments set forth in the table above) in 2013.  We expect to fund the construction and development costs and our debt maturities in 2013 using primarily a combination of borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility and existing construction loan facilities.  We expect to fund improvements to existing operating properties using cash flow from operations.

Certain of our debt instruments require that we comply with a number of restrictive financial covenants, including maximum leverage ratio, unencumbered leverage ratio, minimum net worth, minimum fixed charge coverage, minimum unencumbered interest coverage ratio, minimum debt service and maximum secured indebtedness ratio.  As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
During 2012, we owned an investment in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture into which we entered in 2005 to enable us to contribute office properties that were previously wholly owned by us into the joint venture in order to partially dispose of our interest in the properties. We managed the real estate joint venture’s property operations and any required construction projects until January 1, 2013, at which time these responsibilities were assumed by a third party. This real estate joint venture has a two-member management committee that is responsible for making major decisions (as defined in the joint venture agreement) and we control one of the management committee positions.

We and our partner may receive returns in proportion to our investments in the joint venture. As part of our obligations under the joint venture arrangement, we entered into standard nonrecourse loan guarantees (environmental indemnifications and guarantees against fraud and misrepresentation, and springing guarantees of partnership debt in the event of a voluntary bankruptcy of the partnership). The maximum amount we could be required to pay under the guarantees is approximately $65 million. We were entitled to recover 20% of any amounts paid under the guarantees from an affiliate of our partner pursuant to an indemnity agreement so long as we continued to manage the properties; in connection with the transition of our property management responsibilities to a third party effective January 1, 2013, the percentage that we are entitled to recover increased to 80%. In October 2012, the holder of the mortgage debt encumbering all of the joint venture’s properties initiated foreclosure proceedings. Management considered this event and estimates that the aggregate fair value of the guarantees would not exceed the amounts included in distributions received in excess of investment in unconsolidated real estate joint venture reported on the consolidated balance sheets.

While we historically accounted for our investment in this joint venture using the equity method, we discontinued our application of the equity method effective October 2012 due to our having neither the obligation nor intent to support the joint venture. We had distributions in excess of our investment in this unconsolidated real estate joint venture of $6.4 million as of December 31, 2012 due to the following: our deferral of gain in a prior period on our initial contribution of property to the joint venture due to our guarantees described above; and our subsequent recognition of losses under the equity method in excess of our investment due to such guarantees and our continued intent to support the joint venture prior to October 2012. We recognized equity in the losses of this joint venture of $349,000 in 2012.
 
We had no other material off-balance sheet arrangements during 2012.
 
Inflation
 
Most of our tenants are obligated to pay their share of a building’s operating expenses to the extent such expenses exceed amounts established in their leases, based on historical expense levels.  Some of our tenants are obligated to pay their full share of a building’s operating expenses.  These arrangements somewhat reduce our exposure to increases in such costs resulting from inflation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We adopted guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) effective January 1, 2012 related to the presentation of comprehensive income that requires us to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  We adopted this guidance using retrospective application.  This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity.  Our adoption of this guidance did not affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or measurement of comprehensive income but did change the location of our disclosure pertaining to comprehensive income in our consolidated financial statements.

52


 
We adopted guidance issued by the FASB effective January 1, 2012 that amends measurement and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements to improve consistency with International Financial Reporting Standards.  In connection with our adoption of this guidance, we made an accounting policy election to use an exception provided for in the guidance with respect to measuring counterparty credit risk for derivative instruments; this election enables us to continue to measure the fair value of groups of assets and liabilities associated with derivative instruments consistently with how market participants would price the net risk exposure at the measurement date.  Our adoption of this guidance did not affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows but did result in additional disclosure pertaining to our fair value measurements.
 
We adopted guidance issued by the FASB effective January 1, 2012 relating to the testing of goodwill for impairment that permits us to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test.  This guidance eliminates the requirement to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.  Our adoption of this guidance did not materially affect our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

Item 7A.           Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
We are exposed to certain market risks, the most predominant of which is change in interest rates.  Increases in interest rates can result in increased interest expense under our Revolving Credit Facility and other variable rate debt.  Increases in interest rates can also result in increased interest expense when our fixed rate debt matures and needs to be refinanced.
 
The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2012 our debt obligations and weighted average interest rates for fixed rate debt by expected maturity date (dollars in thousands):
 
For the Years Ending December 31,
 
 
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
Thereafter
 
Total
Long term debt: (1)
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Fixed rate debt (2)
$
101,866

 
$
157,526

 
$
347,848

 
$
278,642

 
$
301,388

 
$
2,490

 
$
1,189,760

Weighted average interest rate
5.62
%
 
6.41
%
 
4.67
%
 
6.57
%
 
5.54
%
 
2.62
%
 
5.64
%
Variable rate debt
$
19,263

 
$
815

 
$
447,954

 
$
—

 
$
250,000

 
$
120,000

 
$
838,032


(1) 
Maturities include $17.5 million in 2013 and $411.1 million in 2015 that may each be extended for one year, subject to certain conditions.
(2)  
Represents principal maturities only and therefore excludes net discounts of $8.6 million.
 
The fair value of our debt was $2.1 billion at December 31, 2012 and $2.4 billion at December 31, 2011.  If interest rates had been 1% lower, the fair value of our fixed-rate debt would have increased by approximately $63.0 million at December 31, 2012 and $77.5 million at December 31, 2011.
 

53


The following table sets forth information pertaining to interest rate swap contracts in place as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and their respective fair values (dollars in thousands):
Notional
 
Fixed
 
Floating Rate
 
Effective
 
Expiration
 
Fair Value at December 31,
Amount
 
Rate
 
Index
 
Date
 
Date
 
2012
 
2011
$
100,000

 
0.6123
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2012
 
9/1/2014
 
$
(594
)
 
$
55

100,000

 
0.6100
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2012
 
9/1/2014
 
(591
)
 
56

100,000

 
0.8320
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2012
 
9/1/2015
 
(1,313
)
 
(66
)
100,000

 
0.8320
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2012
 
9/1/2015
 
(1,313
)
 
(49
)
38,475

(1)
3.8300
%
 
One-Month LIBOR + 2.25%
 
11/2/2010
 
11/2/2015
 
(1,268
)
 
(1,054
)
100,000

 
0.8055
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
9/2/2014
 
9/1/2016
 
(263
)
 
—

100,000

 
0.8100
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
9/2/2014
 
9/1/2016
 
(272
)
 
—

100,000

 
1.6730
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
9/1/2015
 
8/1/2019
 
(154
)
 
—

100,000

 
1.7300
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
9/1/2015
 
8/1/2019
 
(417
)
 
—

50,000

 
0.5025
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2011
 
1/3/2012
 
—

 
(1
)
50,000

 
0.5025
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2011
 
1/3/2012
 
—

 
(1
)
120,000

 
1.7600
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/2/2009
 
5/1/2012
 
—

 
(552
)
100,000

 
1.9750
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/1/2010
 
5/1/2012
 
—

 
(532
)
100,000

(2)
3.8415
%
 
Three-Month LIBOR
 
9/30/2011
 
9/30/2021
 
—

 
(16,333
)
75,000

(2)
3.8450
%
 
Three-Month LIBOR
 
9/30/2011
 
9/30/2021
 
—

 
(12,275
)
100,000

(2)
2.0525
%
 
Three-Month LIBOR-Reverse
 
12/30/2011
 
9/30/2021
 
—

 
345

75,000

(2)
2.0525
%
 
Three-Month LIBOR-Reverse
 
12/30/2011
 
9/30/2021
 
—

 
260

 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(6,185
)
 
$
(30,147
)

(1)
The notional amount of this instrument is scheduled to amortize to $36.2 million.
(2)
As described further in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements, we cash settled these instruments, along with interest accrued thereon, for an aggregate of $29.7 million.

Based on our variable-rate debt balances, including the effect of interest rate swap contracts, our interest expense would have increased by $5.0 million in the 2012 and $3.8 million in 2011 if short-term interest rates were 1% higher. 

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

This item is included in a separate section at the end of this report beginning on page F-1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2012. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012 were functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

I.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

(a)    Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is included in a separate section at the end of this report on page F-2.

(b)    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm is included in a separate section at the end of this report on page F-3.

54



(c)    Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
Item 9B. Other Information
None.


PART III
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation; Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters; Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence; and Principal Accountant Fees and Services
For the information required by Item 10, Item 11, Item 12, Item 13 and Item 14, you should refer to our definitive proxy statement relating to the 2013 Annual Meeting of our Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K:

1.
Financial Statements. See “Index to consolidated financial statements” on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2.
Financial Statement Schedule. See “Index to consolidated financial statements” on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3.
See section below entitled “Exhibits.”

(b)
Exhibits. Refer to the Exhibit Index that follows. Unless otherwise noted, the file number of all documents incorporated by reference is 1-14023.

55



EXHIBIT
NO.
 
DESCRIPTION
3.1.1
 
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Registrant (filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-45649) and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.2
 
Articles of Amendment of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust (filed on March 22, 2002 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.3
 
Articles of Amendment of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.4
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, dated July 2, 1999 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 7, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.5
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.6
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series D Convertible Preferred Shares (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.7
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, dated April 3, 2001 (filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on April 4, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.8
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, dated September 13, 2001 (filed with the Registrant’s Amended Current Report on Form 8-K on September 14, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.9
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, dated August 6, 2003 (filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A on August 7, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.10
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, dated December 11, 2003 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 12, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.11
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 19, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.12
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series K Cumulative Redeemable Convertible Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.13
 
Articles Supplementary of Corporate Office Properties Trust relating to the Series L Cumulative Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 25, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.14
 
Articles of Amendment of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.15
 
Articles of Amendment of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.16
 
Articles of Amendment of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 19, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2.1
 
Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended and restated on December 3, 2009 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 9, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2.2
 
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 18, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3
 
Form of certificate for the Registrant's Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 par value per share (filed with the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-45649) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1
 
Indenture, dated as of April 7, 2010, among Corporate Office Properties, L.P., as issuer, Corporate Office Properties Trust, as guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 16, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2
 
4.25% Exchangeable Senior Note due 2030 of Corporate Office Properties, L.P. (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 16, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

56


EXHIBIT
NO.
 
DESCRIPTION
10.1.1
 
Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated December 7, 1999 (filed on March 16, 2000 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.2
 
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated December 21, 1999 (filed on March 16, 2000 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.3
 
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated December 21, 1999 (filed with the Company’s Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 dated November 1, 2000 (Registration Statement No. 333-71807) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.4
 
Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated September 29, 2000 (filed with the Company’s Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 dated November 1, 2000 (Registration Statement No. 333-71807) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.5
 
Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated November 27, 2000 (filed on March 27, 2003 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.6
 
Fifth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated January 25, 2001 (filed on March 27, 2003 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.7
 
Sixth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated April 3, 2001 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 4, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.8
 
Seventh Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated August 30, 2001 (filed on March 27, 2003 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.9
 
Eighth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated September 14, 2001 (filed with the Company’s Amended Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.10
 
Ninth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated October 16, 2001 (filed on March 27, 2003 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.11
 
Tenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated December 29, 2001 (filed on March 27, 2003 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.12
 
Eleventh Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, dated December 15, 2002 (filed on March 27, 2003 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.13
 
Twelfth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated June 2, 2003 (filed on August 12, 2003 with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.14
 
Thirteenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated August 11, 2003 (filed on March 27, 2003 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.15
 
Fourteenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated December 18, 2003 (filed on March 11, 2004 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.16
 
Fifteenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated January 31, 2004 (filed on March 11, 2004 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.17
 
Sixteenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated April 15, 2004 (filed on May 7, 2004 with the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.18
 
Seventeenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated September 23, 2004 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.19
 
Eighteenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated April 18, 2005 (filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on April 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

57


EXHIBIT
NO.
 
DESCRIPTION
10.1.20
 
Nineteenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated July 8, 2005 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 14, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.21
 
Twentieth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated June 29, 2006 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.22
 
Twenty-First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated July 20, 2006 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 26, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.23
 
Twenty-Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated January 9, 2007 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.24
 
Twenty-Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated April 6, 2007 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.25
 
Twenty-Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated November 2, 2007 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.26
 
Twenty-Fifth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated December 31, 2008 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.27
 
Twenty-Sixth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated March 4, 2010 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 10, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.28
 
Twenty-Seventh Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated February 3, 2011 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.29
 
Twenty-Eighth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated September 15, 2011 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1.30
 
Twenty-Ninth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Corporate Office Properties, L.P., dated June 27, 2012 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2.1*
 
Corporate Office Properties Trust 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-45649) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2.2*
 
Amendment No. 1 to Corporate Office Properties Trust 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan (filed on August 13, 1999 with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2.3*
 
Amendment No. 2 to Corporate Office Properties Trust 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan (filed on March 22, 2002 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3*
 
Corporate Office Properties Trust Supplemental Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Commission File No. 333-87384) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4.1*
 
Employment Agreement, dated July 13, 2005, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P. Corporate Office Properties Trust and Randall M. Griffin (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 19, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4.2*
 
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated May 30, 2006, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust and Randall M. Griffin (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4.3*
 
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust and Randall M. Griffin (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4.4*
 
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2010, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust and Randall M. Griffin (filed on October 29, 2010 with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

58


EXHIBIT
NO.
 
DESCRIPTION
10.5.1*
 
Employment Agreement, dated September 12, 2002, between the Operating Partnership, COPT and Roger A. Waesche, Jr. (filed on March 27, 2003 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5.2*
 
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 4, 2005, between the Operating Partnership, COPT and Roger A. Waesche, Jr. (filed on March 16, 2005 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5.3*
 
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated May 30, 2006, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust, and Roger A. Waesche, Jr. (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5.4*
 
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated July 31, 2006, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust, and Roger A. Waesche, Jr. (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5.5*
 
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 2, 2007, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust, and Roger A. Waesche, Jr. (filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5.6*
 
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2010, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust, and Roger A. Waesche, Jr. (filed on October 29, 2010 with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5.7*
 
Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 12, 2012, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust, and Roger A. Waesche, Jr. (filed herewith).
10.6.1*
 
Employment Agreement, dated July 31, 2006, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust and Stephen E. Riffee (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6.2*
 
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust and Stephen E. Riffee (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6.3*
 
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2010, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust and Stephen E. Riffee (filed on October 29, 2010 with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6.4*
 
Employment Agreement, dated June 14, 2012, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust and Stephen E. Riffee (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 19, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7.1*
 
Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, between Corporate Development Services, LLC, Corporate Office Properties Trust and Wayne Lingafelter (filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7.2*
 
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2010, between Corporate Development Services, LLC, Corporate Office Properties Trust and Wayne Lingafelter (filed on October 29, 2010 with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8.1*
 
Employment Agreement, dated September 15, 2011, between Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust and Stephen E. Budorick (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9
 
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 16, 1998, for the benefit of certain shareholders of the Company (filed on August 12, 1998 with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10
 
Registration Rights Agreement, dated January 25, 2001, for the benefit of Barony Trust Limited (filed on March 22, 2001 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11.1*
 
Corporate Office Properties Trust Supplemental Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11.2*
 
First Amendment to the Corporate Office Properties Trust Supplemental Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan dated December 4, 2008 (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

59


EXHIBIT
NO.
 
DESCRIPTION
10.12.1*
 
Corporate Office Properties Trust 2008 Omnibus Equity and Incentive Plan (included in Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12.2*
 
Corporate Office Properties Trust Amended and Restated 2008 Omnibus Equity and Incentive Plan (included in Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13
 
Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 7, 2010, among Corporate Office Properties, L.P., Corporate Office Properties Trust, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and RBC Capital Markets Corporation (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 16, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14
 
Common Stock Delivery Agreement, dated April 7, 2010, among Corporate Office Properties, L.P. and Corporate Office Properties Trust (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 16, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15
 
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2011, by and among Corporate Office Properties, L.P.; Corporate Office Properties Trust; J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; KeyBanc Capital Markets; KeyBank National Association; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A.; Royal Bank of Canada; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Barclays Bank PLC; PNC Bank, National Association; Regions Bank; Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company; and SunTrust Bank (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated September 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16
 
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2011, by and among Corporate Office Properties, L.P.; Corporate Office Properties Trust; J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; KeyBanc Capital Markets; KeyBank National Association; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A.; Royal Bank of Canada; Barclays Bank PLC; PNC Bank, National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Regions Bank; Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company; and SunTrust Bank (filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated September 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17
 
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2012, by and among Corporate Office Properties, L.P.; Corporate Office Properties Trust; J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; KeyBanc Capital Markets; KeyBank National Association; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A.; Royal Bank of Canada; and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (filed with the Company’s Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
12.1
 
Statement regarding Computation of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Share Dividends (filed herewith).
21.1
 
Subsidiaries of Registrant (filed herewith).
23.1
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
31.1
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Corporate Office Properties Trust required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith).
31.2
 
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Corporate Office Properties Trust required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith).
32.1
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Corporate Office Properties Trust required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.) (Furnished herewith.)
32.2
 
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Corporate Office Properties Trust required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.) (Furnished herewith.)
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document (furnished herewith).
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (furnished herewith).
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith).
101.LAB
 
XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase (furnished herewith).
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith).
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (furnished herewith).
* - Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.
(c)    Not applicable.

60




SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
CORPORATE OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2013
By:
/s/ Roger A. Waesche, Jr.
 
 
 
Roger A. Waesche, Jr.
 
 
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2013
By:
/s/ Stephen E. Riffee
 
 
 
Stephen E. Riffee
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


61


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signatures
 
Title
Date
 /s/ Jay H . Shidler
 
Chairman of the Board and Trustee
February 12, 2013
(Jay H. Shidler)
 
 
 
/s/ Clay W. Hamlin, III
 
Vice Chairman of the Board and Trustee
February 12, 2013
(Clay W. Hamlin, III)
 
 
 
/s/ Roger A. Waesche, Jr.
 
President and Chief Executive Officer and Trustee
February 12, 2013
(Roger A. Waesche, Jr.)
 
 
 
/s/ Stephen E. Riffee
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
February 12, 2013
(Stephen E. Riffee)
 
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
 
/s/ Gregory J. Thor
 
Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief
February 12, 2013
(Gregory J. Thor)
 
Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
 
/s/ Thomas F. Brady
 
Trustee
February 12, 2013
(Thomas F. Brady)
 
 
 
/s/ Robert L. Denton
 
Trustee
February 12, 2013
( Robert L. Denton)
 
 
 
/s/ Elizabeth A. Hight
 
Trustee
February 12, 2013
(Elizabeth A. Hight)
 
 
 
/s/ David M. Jacobstein
 
Trustee
February 12, 2013
(David M. Jacobstein)
 
 
 
/s/ Steven D. Kesler
 
Trustee
February 12, 2013
(Steven D. Kesler)
 
 
 
/s/ Richard Szafranski
 
Trustee
February 12, 2013
(Richard Szafranski)
 
 
 
/s/ Kenneth D. Wethe
 
Trustee
February 12, 2013
(Kenneth D. Wethe)
 
 
 



62



CORPORATE OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





F-1




Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and trustees; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 based upon criteria in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on our assessment, management determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012 based on the criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.


F-2





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Corporate Office Properties Trust:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Corporate Office Properties Trust and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Baltimore, MD
February 12, 2013


F-3




Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Assets
 

 
 

Properties, net:
 

 
 

Operating properties, net
$
2,597,666

 
$
2,714,056

Projects in development or held for future development
565,378

 
638,919

Total properties, net
3,163,044

 
3,352,975

Assets held for sale, net
140,229

 
116,616

Cash and cash equivalents
10,594

 
5,559

Restricted cash and marketable securities
21,557

 
36,232

Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,694 and $3,546, respectively)
19,247

 
26,032

Deferred rent receivable
85,802

 
86,856

Intangible assets on real estate acquisitions, net
75,879

 
89,120

Deferred leasing and financing costs, net
59,952

 
66,515

Prepaid expenses and other assets
77,455

 
83,650

Total assets
$
3,653,759

 
$
3,863,555

Liabilities and equity
 

 
 

Liabilities:
 

 
 

Debt, net
$
2,019,168

 
$
2,426,303

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
97,922

 
95,714

Rents received in advance and security deposits
27,632

 
29,548

Dividends and distributions payable
28,698

 
35,038

Deferred revenue associated with operating leases
11,995

 
15,554

Distributions received in excess of investment in unconsolidated real estate joint venture
6,420

 
6,071

Interest rate derivatives
6,185

 
30,863

Other liabilities
8,942

 
9,657

Total liabilities
2,206,962

 
2,648,748

Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)


 


Redeemable noncontrolling interest
10,298

 
8,908

Equity:
 

 
 

Corporate Office Properties Trust’ s shareholders’ equity:
 

 
 

Preferred Shares of beneficial interest at liquidation preference
333,833

 
216,333

Common Shares of beneficial interest ($0.01 par value; 125,000,000 shares authorized, shares issued and outstanding of 80,952,986 at December 31, 2012 and 72,011,324 at December 31, 2011)
809

 
720

Additional paid-in capital
1,653,672

 
1,451,078

Cumulative distributions in excess of net income
(617,455
)
 
(534,041
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(5,435
)
 
(1,733
)
Total Corporate Office Properties Trust’s shareholders’ equity
1,365,424

 
1,132,357

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries:
 

 
 

Common units in the Operating Partnership
52,122

 
55,183

Preferred units in the Operating Partnership
8,800

 
8,800

Other consolidated entities
10,153

 
9,559

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
71,075

 
73,542

Total equity
1,436,499

 
1,205,899

Total liabilities and equity
$
3,653,759

 
$
3,863,555

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Rental revenue
$
367,654

 
$
348,006

 
$
316,038

Tenant recoveries and other real estate operations revenue
86,517

 
80,490

 
71,521

Construction contract and other service revenues
73,836

 
84,345

 
104,675

Total revenues
528,007

 
512,841

 
492,234

Expenses
 

 
 

 
 
Property operating expenses
167,161

 
162,397

 
146,617

Depreciation and amortization associated with real estate operations
113,480

 
113,111

 
97,897

Construction contract and other service expenses
70,576

 
81,639

 
102,302

Impairment losses
43,214

 
83,478

 
—

General, administrative and leasing expenses
31,900

 
30,314

 
28,501

Business development expenses and land carry costs
5,711

 
6,122

 
6,403

Total operating expenses
432,042

 
477,061

 
381,720

Operating income
95,965

 
35,780

 
110,514

Interest expense
(94,624
)
 
(98,222
)
 
(95,729
)
Interest and other income
7,172

 
5,603

 
9,568

Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(943
)
 
(1,639
)
 
—

Loss on interest rate derivatives
—

 
(29,805
)
 
—

Income (loss) from continuing operations before equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated entities and income taxes
7,570

 
(88,283
)
 
24,353

Equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated entities
(546
)
 
(331
)
 
1,376

Income tax (expense) benefit
(381
)
 
6,710

 
(108
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
6,643

 
(81,904
)
 
25,621

Discontinued operations
13,677

 
(48,404
)
 
17,054

Income (loss) before gain on sales of real estate
20,320

 
(130,308
)
 
42,675

Gain on sales of real estate, net of income taxes
21

 
2,732

 
2,829

Net income (loss)
20,341

 
(127,576
)
 
45,504

Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests:
 

 
 

 
 
Common units in the Operating Partnership
87

 
8,439

 
(2,116
)
Preferred units in the Operating Partnership
(660
)
 
(660
)
 
(660
)
Other consolidated entities
1,209

 
369

 
32

Net income (loss) attributable to Corporate Office Properties Trust
20,977

 
(119,428
)
 
42,760

Preferred share dividends
(20,844
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
Issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares
(1,827
)
 
—

 
—

Net (loss) income attributable to Corporate Office Properties Trust common shareholders
$
(1,694
)
 
$
(135,530
)
 
$
26,658

Net income (loss) attributable to Corporate Office Properties Trust:
 

 
 

 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
8,051

 
$
(73,884
)
 
$
27,029

Discontinued operations, net
12,926

 
(45,544
)
 
15,731

Net income (loss) attributable to Corporate Office Properties Trust
$
20,977

 
$
(119,428
)
 
$
42,760

Basic earnings per common share (1)
 

 
 

 
 
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(1.31
)
 
$
0.17

Discontinued operations
0.18

 
(0.66
)
 
0.26

Net (loss) income attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(1.97
)
 
$
0.43

Diluted earnings per common share (1)
 
 
 
 
 
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(1.31
)
 
$
0.17

Discontinued operations
0.18

 
(0.66
)
 
0.26

Net (loss) income attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(1.97
)
 
$
0.43

(1) Basic and diluted earnings per common share are calculated based on amounts attributable to common shareholders of Corporate Office Properties Trust.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in thousands) 
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Net income (loss)
 
$
20,341

 
$
(127,576
)
 
$
45,504

Other comprehensive (loss) income
 
 

 
 

 
 
Unrealized losses on interest rate derivatives
 
(7,676
)
 
(31,531
)
 
(5,473
)
Losses on interest rate derivatives included in net income (loss)
 
3,697

 
4,601

 
3,689

Loss on interest rate derivatives upon discontinuing hedge accounting
 
—

 
28,430

 
—

Other comprehensive (loss) income
 
(3,979
)
 
1,500

 
(1,784
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
16,362

 
(126,076
)
 
43,720

Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
961

 
8,132

 
(2,591
)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to COPT
 
$
17,323

 
$
(117,944
)
 
$
41,129

 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-6


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Preferred
Shares
 
Common
Shares
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Cumulative
Distributions in
Excess of Net
Income
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2009 (58,342,673 common shares outstanding)
$
216,333

 
$
583

 
$
1,022,452

 
$
(209,941
)
 
$
(1,907
)
 
$
93,112

 
$
1,120,632

Issuance of 4.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes
—

 
—

 
18,149

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
18,149

Conversion of common units to common shares (663,498 shares)
—

 
6

 
9,561

 
—

 
—

 
(9,567
)
 
—

Common shares issued to the public (7,475,000 shares)
—

 
75

 
245,546

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
245,621

Exercise of share options (278,656 shares)
—

 
3

 
4,572

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
4,575

Share-based compensation
—

 
2

 
11,843

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
11,845

Restricted common share redemptions (105,215 shares)
—

 
—

 
(3,913
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(3,913
)
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests resulting from changes in Operating Partnership ownership
—

 
—

 
(10,274
)
 
—

 
—

 
10,274

 
—

Comprehensive income
—

 
—

 
—

 
42,760

 
(2,256
)
 
3,216

 
43,720

Dividends
—

 
—

 
—

 
(114,613
)
 
—

 
—

 
(114,613
)
Distributions to owners of common and preferred units in the Operating Partnership
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(7,926
)
 
(7,926
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
510

 
510

Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities
—

 
—

 
(2,344
)
 
—

 
—

 
(2,118
)
 
(4,462
)
Balance at December 31, 2010 (66,931,582 common shares outstanding)
216,333

 
669

 
1,295,592

 
(281,794
)
 
(4,163
)
 
87,501

 
1,314,138

Conversion of common units to common shares (100,939 shares)
—

 
1

 
1,520

 
—

 
—

 
(1,521
)
 
—

Common shares issued to the public (4,600,000 shares)
—

 
46

 
145,321

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
145,367

Exercise of share options (191,264 shares)
—

 
2

 
2,459

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
2,461

Share-based compensation
—

 
2

 
14,265

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
14,267

Restricted common share redemptions (114,687 shares)
—

 
—

 
(3,990
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(3,990
)
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests resulting from changes in Operating Partnership ownership
—

 
—

 
(2,798
)
 
—

 
—

 
2,798

 
—

Comprehensive loss
—

 
—

 
—

 
(119,428
)
 
2,430

 
(7,671
)
 
(124,669
)
Dividends
—

 
—

 
—

 
(132,819
)
 
—

 
—

 
(132,819
)
Distributions to owners of common and preferred units in the Operating Partnership
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(7,833
)
 
(7,833
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities
—

 
—

 
(23
)
 
—

 
—

 
284

 
261

Distributions to noncontrolling interest in other consolidated entities
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(16
)
 
(16
)
Adjustment to arrive at fair value of noncontrolling interest
—

 
—

 
(1,315
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(1,315
)
Increase in tax benefit from share-based compensation
—

 
—

 
47

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
47

Balance at December 31, 2011 (72,011,324 common shares outstanding)
216,333

 
720

 
1,451,078

 
(534,041
)
 
(1,733
)
 
73,542

 
1,205,899

Conversion of common units to common shares (234,246 shares)
—

 
2

 
2,812

 
—

 
—

 
(2,814
)
 
—

Preferred shares issued to the public (6,900,000 shares)
172,500

 
—

 
(6,848
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
165,652

Common shares issued to the public (8,625,000 shares)
—

 
86

 
204,610

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
204,696

Redemption of preferred shares (2,200,000 shares)
(55,000
)
 
—

 
1,827

 
(1,827
)
 
—

 
—

 
(55,000
)
Exercise of share options (61,624 shares)
—

 
—

 
928

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
928

Share-based compensation
—

 
1

 
11,183

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
11,184

Restricted common share redemptions (139,851 shares)
—

 
—

 
(3,379
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(3,379
)
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests resulting from changes in Operating Partnership ownership
—

 
—

 
(4,627
)
 
—

 
—

 
4,627

 
—

Comprehensive income
—

 
—

 
—

 
20,977

 
(3,702
)
 
1,652

 
18,927

Dividends
—

 
—

 
—

 
(102,564
)
 
—

 
—

 
(102,564
)
Distributions to owners of common and preferred units in the Operating Partnership
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(5,277
)
 
(5,277
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(655
)
 
(655
)
Adjustment to arrive at fair value of noncontrolling interest
—

 
—

 
(3,955
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(3,955
)
Increase in tax benefit from share-based compensation
—

 
—

 
43

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
43

Balance at December 31, 2012 (80,952,986 common shares outstanding)
$
333,833

 
$
809

 
$
1,653,672

 
$
(617,455
)
 
$
(5,435
)
 
$
71,075

 
$
1,436,499

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Cash flows from operating activities
 

 
 

 
 
Revenues from real estate operations received
$
483,421

 
$
476,762

 
$
453,847

Construction contract and other service revenues received
77,831

 
88,433

 
112,644

Property operating expenses paid
(174,683
)
 
(180,041
)
 
(173,625
)
Construction contract and other service expenses paid
(67,952
)
 
(94,140
)
 
(124,867
)
General, administrative, leasing, business development and land carry costs paid
(22,904
)
 
(28,027
)
 
(23,969
)
Interest expense paid
(87,394
)
 
(93,715
)
 
(87,917
)
Previously accreted interest expense paid
—

 
(17,314
)
 
—

Settlement of interest rate derivatives
(29,738
)
 
—

 
—

Proceeds from sale of trading marketable securities
18,975

 
—

 
—

Exit costs on property dispositions
(4,146
)
 
—

 
—

Payments in connection with early extinguishment of debt
(2,637
)
 
(353
)
 
—

Interest and other income received
1,073

 
698

 
323

Income taxes paid
(8
)
 
(160
)
 
—

Net cash provided by operating activities
191,838

 
152,143

 
156,436

Cash flows from investing activities
 

 
 

 
 
Purchases of and additions to properties
 

 
 

 
 
Construction, development and redevelopment
(165,275
)
 
(232,667
)
 
(303,064
)
Acquisitions of operating properties
(48,308
)
 
(32,856
)
 
(146,275
)
Tenant improvements on operating properties
(27,103
)
 
(37,195
)
 
(20,826
)
Other capital improvements on operating properties
(20,066
)
 
(16,906
)
 
(10,422
)
Proceeds from sales of properties
290,603

 
79,638

 
27,576

Proceeds from sale of equity method investment
—

 
5,773

 
—

Mortgage and other loan receivables funded or acquired
(14,232
)
 
(23,377
)
 
(5,588
)
Mortgage and other loan receivables payments received
10,113

 
16,759

 
1,568

Leasing costs paid
(13,278
)
 
(15,997
)
 
(14,403
)
Investment in unconsolidated entities
(250
)
 
(250
)
 
(6,600
)
Other
1,540

 
(3,309
)
 
(1,133
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
13,744

 
(260,387
)
 
(479,167
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 

 
 

 
 
Proceeds from debt
 
 
 
 
 
Revolving Credit Facility
329,000

 
1,180,000

 
663,000

Other debt proceeds
403,117

 
456,206

 
359,912

Repayments of debt
 
 
 
 
 
Revolving Credit Facility
(991,000
)
 
(813,000
)
 
(733,000
)
Scheduled principal amortization
(11,684
)
 
(13,755
)
 
(13,996
)
Other debt repayments
(124,386
)
 
(698,100
)
 
(66,663
)
Deferred financing costs paid
(3,371
)
 
(13,113
)
 
(8,570
)
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred shares
165,652

 
—

 
—

Net proceeds from issuance of common shares
205,425

 
147,828

 
250,196

Redemption of preferred shares
(55,000
)
 
—

 
—

Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities
—

 
—

 
(4,462
)
Common share dividends paid
(89,161
)
 
(114,643
)
 
(93,792
)
Preferred share dividends paid
(19,087
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership
(5,828
)
 
(7,875
)
 
(8,099
)
Restricted share redemptions
(3,379
)
 
(3,990
)
 
(3,913
)
Other
(845
)
 
245

 
60

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(200,547
)
 
103,701

 
324,571

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
5,035

 
(4,543
)
 
1,840

Cash and cash equivalents
 

 
 

 
 
Beginning of period
5,559

 
10,102

 
8,262

End of period
$
10,594

 
$
5,559

 
$
10,102

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-8


 

Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(in thousands)
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 

 
 

 
 
Net income (loss)
$
20,341

 
$
(127,576
)
 
$
45,504

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 

 
 

 
 
Depreciation and other amortization
124,418

 
136,594

 
125,819

Impairment losses
62,702

 
151,021

 
—

Loss on interest rate derivatives
—

 
29,805

 
—

Settlement of previously accreted interest expense
—

 
(17,314
)
 
—

Amortization of deferred financing costs
6,243

 
6,596

 
5,871

Increase in deferred rent receivable
(11,776
)
 
(10,102
)
 
(5,706
)
Amortization of net debt discounts
3,155

 
5,540

 
5,841

Gain on sales of real estate
(20,961
)
 
(7,528
)
 
(3,917
)
Gain on equity method investment
—

 
(2,452
)
 
(6,406
)
Share-based compensation
9,982

 
11,920

 
11,845

(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt
(3,430
)
 
1,670

 
—

Other
(3,195
)
 
(314
)
 
(3,872
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 

 
 
 
 
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
6,693

 
(7,094
)
 
(1,680
)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and marketable securities
14,934

 
2,160

 
(4,875
)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets
8,550

 
(687
)
 
8,674

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
4,101

 
(18,041
)
 
(19,644
)
Decrease in rents received in advance and security deposits
(1,916
)
 
(2,055
)
 
(1,018
)
Decrease in interest rate derivatives in connection with cash settlement
(28,003
)
 
—

 
—

Net cash provided by operating activities
$
191,838

 
$
152,143

 
$
156,436

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
 

 
 

 
 
(Decrease) increase in accrued capital improvements, leasing and other investing activity costs
$
(1,227
)
 
$
11,719

 
$
4,576

Increase in property, debt and other liabilities in connection with acquisitions
$
—

 
$
3,040

 
$
74,244

Decrease in property in connection with surrender of property in settlement of debt
$
12,042

 
$
—

 
$
—

Decrease in debt in connection with surrender of property in settlement of debt
$
16,304

 
$
—

 
$
—

Increase in property and noncontrolling interests in connection with property contribution by a noncontrolling interest in a joint venture
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
9,000

Increase (decrease) in fair value of derivatives applied to AOCL and noncontrolling interests
$
4,040

 
$
1,438

 
$
(1,846
)
Dividends/distribution payable
$
28,698

 
$
35,038

 
$
32,986

Decrease in noncontrolling interests and increase in shareholders’ equity in connection with the conversion of common units into common shares
$
2,814

 
$
1,521

 
$
9,567

Adjustments to noncontrolling interests resulting from changes in Operating Partnership ownership
$
4,627

 
$
2,798

 
$
10,274

Increase in redeemable noncontrolling interest and decrease in shareholders’ equity in connection with adjustment to arrive at fair value of noncontrolling interest
$
3,955

 
$
1,315

 
$
—

 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-9

Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


1.    Organization
 
Corporate Office Properties Trust (“COPT”) and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” “we” or “us”) is a fully-integrated and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that focuses primarily on serving the specialized requirements of United States Government agencies and defense contractors, most of whom are engaged in defense information technology and national security related activities. We generally acquire, develop, manage and lease office and data center properties concentrated in large office parks located near knowledge-based government demand drivers and/or in targeted markets or submarkets in the Greater Washington, DC/Baltimore region. As of December 31, 2012, our investments in real estate included the following:

•
208 operating office properties totaling 18.8 million square feet;
•
13 office properties under construction or redevelopment, or for which we were contractually committed to construct, that we estimate will total approximately 1.7 million square feet upon completion, including two partially operational properties included above;
•
land held or under pre-construction totaling 1,694 acres (including 561 controlled but not owned) that we believe are potentially developable into approximately 19.3 million square feet; and
•
a partially operational, wholesale data center which upon completion and stabilization is expected to have a critical load of 18 megawatts.
 
We conduct almost all of our operations through our operating partnership, Corporate Office Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), of which we are the managing general partner.  The Operating Partnership owns real estate both directly and through subsidiary partnerships and limited liability companies (“LLCs”).  A summary of our Operating Partnership’s forms of ownership and the percentage of those ownership forms owned by COPT as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 follows: 
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Common Units
95
%
 
94
%
Series G Preferred Units
N/A

 
100
%
Series H Preferred Units
100
%
 
100
%
Series I Preferred Units
0
%
 
0
%
Series J Preferred Units
100
%
 
100
%
Series K Preferred Units
100
%
 
100
%
Series L Preferred Units
100
%
 
N/A

 
Three of our trustees also controlled, either directly or through ownership by other entities or family members, an additional 4% of the Operating Partnership’s common units (“common units”) as of December 31, 2012.
 
In addition to owning real estate, the Operating Partnership also owns subsidiaries that provide real estate services such as property management and construction and development services primarily for our properties but also for third parties.
 
2.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of COPT, the Operating Partnership, their subsidiaries and other entities in which we have a majority voting interest and control.  We also consolidate certain entities when control of such entities can be achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of such entities.  We eliminate all significant intercompany balances and transactions in consolidation.
 
We use the equity method of accounting when we own an interest in an entity and can exert significant influence over the entity’s operations but cannot control the entity’s operations. We discontinue equity method accounting if our investment in an entity (and net advances) is reduced to zero unless we have guaranteed obligations of the entity or are otherwise committed to provide further financial support for the entity.
 

F-10


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

We use the cost method of accounting when we own an interest in an entity and cannot exert significant influence over its operations.
 
Revisions 

During 2012, we identified the following errors:

•
the misapplication of accounting guidance related to the recognition of a deferred tax asset resulting from an impairment of assets in the fourth quarter of 2011 that failed to consider a partial reversal of that asset that would result from a cancellation of related inter-company debt in the first quarter of 2012.  The effect of this error was an overstatement of our income tax benefit and an understatement of our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011 of $4.0 million.  Based on an evaluation against our projected annual net income at that time, this error was previously reported as an out-of-period adjustment in the three months ended March 31, 2012;
•
an over-accrual of incentive compensation cost, the effect of which was an overstatement of general and administrative expenses and an overstatement of net loss for the calendar quarter and year ended December 31, 2011 of $700,000. Based on an evaluation against our projected annual net income at that time, this error was previously reported as an out-of-period adjustment in the three months ended March 31, 2012;
•
the misapplication of accounting guidance requiring that we recognize loss allocations to a noncontrolling interest holder in a consolidated real estate joint venture associated with decreases in such holder's claim on the book value of the joint venture’s assets, despite the fact that the real estate held by the joint venture was under development and the joint venture had no underlying losses. The effect of this error was an understatement of losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities of $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011; and
•
the misapplication of accounting guidance pertaining to our reporting for a noncontrolling interest in a consolidated real estate joint venture formed in March 2010 for which the holder of such interest has the right to require us to acquire the interest at fair value. Accounting guidance requires that this noncontrolling interest be classified outside of permanent equity and reported at fair value as of the end of each reporting period, with changes in such fair value reported as equity transactions with no impact to net income or comprehensive income. This error resulted in an overstatement of equity and offsetting understatement of the line entitled “redeemable noncontrolling interest” in the mezzanine section of our consolidated balance sheet of $8.9 million as of December 31, 2011. This error had no effect on our consolidated statements of operations, including our reported net income (losses) or earnings per share.

With respect to the errors in the first two bullets above, we assessed the materiality of these errors on the financial statements in connection with previously filed periodic reports, in accordance with ASC 250 (SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, “Materiality”), and concluded at such time that the errors were not material to any prior annual or interim periods. In assessing the cumulative effect of all such errors, we have since concluded that correction of the errors in 2012 could be considered material to our 2012 net income. Accordingly, in accordance with ASC 250 (SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements,”), the financial statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2011 have been revised. We will revise amounts pertaining to each of the 2012 calendar quarters from January 1, 2012 through September 30, 2012 in future quarterly filings on Form 10-Q. The following are selected line items from our financial statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2011 illustrating the affect of adjustments to revise the financial statements (the “As Previously Reported” columns include the effects of other reclassifications and retrospective changes in presentation discussed below)(in thousands):
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011
 

As Previously Reported
 
Adjustment
 
As Revised
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
$
87,619

 
$
(3,969
)
 
$
83,650

 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
96,425

 
(711
)
 
95,714

 
Redeemable noncontrolling interest
—

 
8,908

 
8,908

 
Additional paid-in capital
1,452,393

 
(1,315
)
 
1,451,078

 
Cumulative distributions in excess of net income
(532,288
)
 
(1,753
)
 
(534,041
)
 
Noncontrolling interests in common units in the Operating Partnership
55,281

 
(98
)
 
55,183

 
Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities
18,559

 
(9,000
)
 
9,559

 

F-11


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
 
As Previously Reported
 
Adjustment
 
As Revised
 
General, administrative and leasing expenses
$
31,025

 
$
(711
)
 
$
30,314

 
Income tax benefit
$
10,679

 
$
(3,969
)
 
$
6,710

 
Net loss
$
(124,318
)
 
$
(3,258
)
 
$
(127,576
)
 
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in common units in the Operating Partnership
$
8,341

 
$
98

 
$
8,439

 
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated entities
$
(1,038
)
 
$
1,407

 
$
369

 
Net loss attributable to Corporate Office Properties Trust
$
(117,675
)
 
$
(1,753
)
 
$
(119,428
)
 
Net loss attributable to Corporate Office Properties Trust common shareholders
$
(133,777
)
 
$
(1,753
)
 
$
(135,530
)
 
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss from continuing operations
$
(1.29
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(1.31
)
 
Net loss attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
(1.94
)
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(1.97
)
 

Reclassifications
 
We reclassified certain amounts from prior periods to conform to the current period presentation of our consolidated financial statements with no effect on previously reported net income or equity.  Included among these reclassifications are retrospective changes in the presentation of:

•
our preferred shares of beneficial interest; these shares are reported on our consolidated balance sheets at their liquidation preference value after having been reported at par value in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K;
•
costs expensed in connection with properties not in operations; these costs are included in the line on our consolidated statements of operations entitled “business development expenses and land carry costs,” after having been included in property operating expenses in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and
•
costs expensed in connection with marketing space for lease to prospective tenants; these costs are included in the line on our consolidated statements of operations entitled “general, administrative and leasing expenses,” after having been included in property operating expenses in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

We make estimates and assumptions when preparing financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These estimates and assumptions affect various matters, including:
•
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets at the dates of the financial statements;
•
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements; and
•
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses in our consolidated statements of operations during the reporting periods.

Significant estimates are inherent in the presentation of our financial statements in a number of areas, including the evaluation of the collectability of accounts and notes receivable, the allocation of property acquisition costs, the determination of estimated useful lives of assets, the determination of lease terms, the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets, the amount of revenue recognized relating to tenant improvements and the level of expense recognized in connection with share-based compensation. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates.

Acquisitions of Properties

Upon completion of property acquisitions, we allocate the purchase price to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities associated with such acquisitions based on our estimates of their fair values. We determine these fair values by using market

F-12


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

data and independent appraisals available to us and making numerous estimates and assumptions. We allocate property acquisitions to the following components:

•
properties based on a valuation performed under the assumption that the property is vacant upon acquisition (the “if vacant value”). The if-vacant value is allocated between land and buildings or, in the case of properties under development, construction in progress. We also allocate additional amounts to properties for in-place tenant improvements based on our estimate of improvements per square foot provided under market leases that would be attributable to the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases;
•
above- and below-market lease intangible assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between: (1) the contractual amounts to be received pursuant to the in-place leases; and (2) our estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding space, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases;
•
in-place lease value based on our estimates of: (1) the present value of additional income to be realized as a result of leases being in place on the acquired properties; and (2) costs to execute similar leases. Our estimate of additional income to be realized includes carrying costs, such as real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses, and revenues during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions. Our estimate of costs to execute similar leases includes leasing commissions, legal and other related costs;
•
tenant relationship value based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics we consider in determining these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant's credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors; and
•
above- and below- market cost arrangements (such as real estate tax treaties or above- or below- market ground leases) based on the present value of the expected benefit from any such arrangements in place on the property at the time of acquisition.

Properties

We report properties to be developed or held and used in operations at our depreciated cost, reduced for impairment losses. The preconstruction stage of the development or redevelopment of an operating property includes efforts and related costs to secure land control and zoning, evaluate feasibility and complete other initial tasks which are essential to development. We capitalize interest expense, real estate taxes and direct and indirect project costs (including related compensation and other indirect costs) associated with properties, or portions thereof, undergoing construction, development and redevelopment activities. We continue to capitalize these costs while construction, development or redevelopment activities are underway until a property becomes “operational,” which occurs upon the earlier of when leases commence or one year after the cessation of major construction activities. When leases commence on portions of a newly-constructed or redeveloped property in the period prior to one year from the cessation of major construction activities, we consider that property to be “partially operational.” When a property is partially operational, we allocate the costs associated with the property between the portion that is operational and the portion under construction. We start depreciating newly-constructed and redeveloped properties as they become operational.
Most of our leases involve some form of improvements to leased space. When we are required to provide improvements under the terms of a lease, we determine whether the improvements constitute landlord assets or tenant assets. We capitalize the cost of the improvements when we deem the improvements to be landlord assets. In determining whether improvements constitute landlord or tenant assets, we consider numerous factors, including: whether the improvements are unique to the tenant or reusable by other tenants; whether the tenant is permitted to alter or remove the improvements without our consent or without compensating us for any lost fair value; whether the ownership of the improvements remains with us or remains with the tenant at the end of the lease term; and whether the economic substance of the lease terms is properly reflected.
We depreciate our fixed assets using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives as follows:
 
 
Estimated Useful Lives
Buildings and building improvements
 
10-40 years
Land improvements
 
10-20 years
Tenant improvements on operating properties
 
Related lease term
Equipment and personal property
 
3-10 years

F-13


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

We assess each of our operating properties for impairment quarterly using cash flow projections and estimated fair values that we derive for each of the properties.  We update the leasing and other assumptions used in these projections regularly, paying particular attention to properties that have experienced chronic vacancy or face significant market challenges.  We review our plans and intentions for our development projects and land parcels quarterly.  Each quarter, we also review the reasonableness of changes in our estimated operating property fair values from amounts estimated in the prior quarter.  If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of certain operating properties, properties in development or land held for future development may be impaired, we perform a recovery analysis for such properties.  For long-lived assets to be held and used, we analyze recoverability based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated from the operations and eventual disposition of the assets over, in most cases, a ten-year holding period.  If we believe there is a significant possibility that we might dispose of the assets earlier, we analyze recoverability using a probability weighted analysis of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated from the operations and eventual disposition of the assets over the various possible holding periods.  If the recovery analysis indicates that the carrying value of a tested property is not recoverable from estimated future cash flows, it is written down to its estimated fair value and an impairment loss is recognized.  If and when our plans change, we revise our recoverability analyses to use the cash flows expected from the operations and eventual disposition of each asset using holding periods that are consistent with our revised plans. Changes in holding periods may require us to recognize significant impairment losses. 

Property fair values are determined based on contract prices, indicative bids, discounted cash flow analyses or yield analyses. Estimated cash flows used in such analyses are based on our plans for the property and our views of market and economic conditions. The estimates consider items such as current and future rental rates, occupancies for the tested property and comparable properties, estimated operating and capital expenditures and recent sales data for comparable properties; most of these items are influenced by market data obtained from third party sources such as CoStar Group and real estate leasing and brokerage firms and our direct experience with the properties and their markets.

When we determine that a property is held for sale, we discontinue the recording of depreciation expense on the property and estimate the fair value, net of selling costs; if we then determine that the estimated fair value, net of selling costs, is less than the net book value of the property, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference and reduce the net book value of the property.
When we sell an operating property, or determine that an operating property is held for sale, and determine that we have no significant continuing involvement in such property, we classify the results of operations for such property as discontinued operations. Interest expense that is specifically identifiable to properties included in discontinued operations is used in the computation of interest expense attributable to discontinued operations.

Sales of Interests in Real Estate

We recognize gains from sales of interests in real estate using the full accrual method, provided that various criteria relating to the terms of sale and any subsequent involvement by us with the real estate sold are met. We recognize gains relating to transactions that do not meet the requirements of the full accrual method of accounting when the full accrual method of accounting criteria are met.
Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments that mature three months or less from when they are purchased. Cash equivalents are reported at cost, which approximates fair value. We maintain our cash in bank accounts in amounts that may exceed Federally insured limits at times. We have not experienced any losses in these accounts in the past and believe that we are not exposed to significant credit risk because our accounts are deposited with major financial institutions.
Investments in Marketable Securities

We classify marketable securities as trading securities when we have the intent to sell such securities in the near term, and classify other marketable securities as available-for-sale securities. We determine the appropriate classification of investments in marketable securities at the acquisition date and re-evaluate the classification at each balance sheet date. We report investments in marketable securities classified as trading securities at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized through earnings. We report investments in marketable securities classified as available-for-sale securities at fair value, with net

F-14


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

unrealized gains or losses deferred to AOCL and realized gains and losses resulting from sales of such investments recognized through earnings.

Accounts and Deferred Rents Receivable and Mortgage and Other Investing Receivables

We maintain allowances for estimated losses resulting from the failure of our customers or borrowers to satisfy their payment obligations. We use judgment in estimating these allowances based primarily upon the payment history and credit status of the entities associated with the individual receivables. We write off these receivables when we believe the facts and circumstances indicate that continued pursuit of collection is no longer warranted. When we earn interest income in connection with receivables for which we have established allowances, we establish allowances in connection with such interest income that is unpaid. When cash is received in connection with receivables for which we have established allowances, we reduce the amount of losses recognized in connection with the receivables’ allowance.

Intangible Assets and Deferred Revenue on Real Estate Acquisitions

We capitalize intangible assets and deferred revenue on real estate acquisitions as described in the section above entitled “Acquisitions of Properties.” We amortize the intangible assets and deferred revenue as follows:
 
 
Amortization Period
Above- and below-market leases
 
Related lease terms
In-place lease value
 
Related lease terms
Tenant relationship value
 
Estimated period of time that tenant will lease space in property
Above- and below-market cost arrangements
 
Term of arrangements
Market concentration premium
 
40 years
We recognize the amortization of acquired above-market and below-market leases as adjustments to rental revenue. We recognize the amortization of above- and below- market cost arrangements as adjustments to property operating expenses. We recognize the amortization of other intangible assets on property acquisitions as amortization expense.

Deferred Leasing and Financing Costs, Net

We defer costs incurred to obtain new tenant leases or extend existing tenant leases, including related compensation costs. We amortize these costs evenly over the lease terms. When tenant leases are terminated early, we expense any unamortized deferred leasing costs associated with those leases over the shortened term of the lease.
We defer costs of financing arrangements and recognize these costs as interest expense over the related loan terms on a straight-line basis, which approximates the amortization that would occur under the effective interest method of amortization. We expense any unamortized loan costs when loans are retired early.

Noncontrolling Interests

Our consolidated noncontrolling interests are comprised of interests in our Operating Partnership and consolidated real estate joint ventures. We evaluate whether noncontrolling interests are subject to redemption features outside of our control. For noncontrolling interests that are currently redeemable or deemed probable to eventually become redeemable, we classify such interests as redeemable noncontrolling interests in the mezzanine section of our consolidated balance sheets; we adjust these interests each period to the greater of their fair value or carrying amount (initial amount as adjusted for allocations of income and losses and future contributions and distributions), with a corresponding offset to additional paid-in capital on our consolidated balance sheets, and only recognize reductions in such interests to the extent of their carrying amount. Our other noncontrolling interests are reported in the equity section of our consolidated balance sheets. The amounts reported for noncontrolling interests on our consolidated statements of operations represent the portion of these entities’ income or losses not attributable to us.


F-15


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Common units of the Operating Partnership are substantially similar economically to our common shares. Common units not owned by us are also exchangeable into our common shares, subject to certain conditions.

The Operating Partnership has 352,000 Series I Preferred Units issued to an unrelated party that have an aggregate liquidation preference of $8.8 million ($25.00 per unit), plus any accrued and unpaid distributions of return thereon (as described below), and may be redeemed for cash by the Operating Partnership at our option any time after September 22, 2019. The owner of these units is entitled to a priority annual cumulative return equal to 7.5% of their liquidation preference through September 22, 2019; the annual cumulative preferred return increases for each subsequent five-year period, subject to certain maximum limits. These units are convertible into common units on the basis of 0.5 common units for each Series I Preferred Unit; the resulting common units would then be exchangeable for common shares in accordance with the terms of the Operating Partnership's agreement of limited partnership.

The table below sets forth activity in our redeemable noncontrolling interest (in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
Beginning balance
 
$
8,908

 
$
9,000

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
(2,565
)
 
(1,407
)
Adjustment to arrive at fair value of interest
 
3,955

 
1,315

Ending balance
 
$
10,298

 
$
8,908

Revenue Recognition

We recognize minimum rents, net of abatements, on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of tenant leases (including periods under bargain renewal options). The non-cancelable term of a lease includes periods when a tenant: (1) may not terminate its lease obligation early; or (2) may terminate its lease obligation early in exchange for a fee or penalty that we consider material enough such that termination would not be probable. We report the amount by which our minimum rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis under leases exceeds the contractual rent billings associated with such leases as deferred rent receivable on our consolidated balance sheets. Amounts by which our minimum rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis under leases are less than the contractual rent billings associated with such leases are included in deferred revenue associated with operating leases on our consolidated balance sheets.
In connection with a tenant's entry into, or modification of, a lease, if we make cash payments to, or on behalf of, the tenant for purposes other than funding the construction of landlord assets, we defer the amount of such payments as lease incentives. We amortize lease incentives as a reduction of rental revenue over the term of the lease.
We recognize tenant recovery revenue in the same periods in which we incur the related expenses. Tenant recovery revenue includes payments from tenants as reimbursement for property taxes, utilities and other property operating expenses.

We recognize fees received for lease terminations as revenue and write off against such revenue any (1) deferred rents receivable, and (2) deferred revenue, lease incentives and intangible assets that are amortizable into rental revenue associated with the leases; the resulting net amount is the net revenue from the early termination of the leases. When a tenant's lease for space in a property is terminated early but the tenant continues to lease such space under a new or modified lease in the property, the net revenue from the early termination of the lease is recognized evenly over the remaining life of the new or modified lease in place on that property.

We recognize fees for services provided by us once services are rendered, fees are determinable and collectability is assured. We recognize revenue under construction contracts using the percentage of completion method when the revenue and costs for such contracts can be estimated with reasonable accuracy; when these criteria do not apply to a contract, we recognize revenue on that contract using the completed contract method. Under the percentage of completion method, we recognize a percentage of the total estimated revenue on a contract based on the cost of services provided on the contract as of a point in time relative to the total estimated costs on the contract.


F-16


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Interest Rate Derivatives

Our primary objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for our making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.  Derivatives are used to hedge the cash flows associated with interest rates on existing debt as well as future debt. We recognize all derivatives as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value. We defer the effective portion of changes in fair value of the designated cash flow hedges to accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”) and reclassify such deferrals to interest expense as interest expense is recognized on the hedged forecasted transactions. We recognize the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of interest rate derivatives directly in interest expense. When an interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge no longer qualifies for hedge accounting, we recognize changes in fair value of the hedge previously deferred to AOCL, along with any changes in fair value occurring thereafter, through earnings. We do not use interest rate derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. We manage counter-party risk by only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other risk factors.

We use standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models, replacement cost and termination cost in computing the fair value of derivatives at each balance sheet date.

Please refer to Note 11 for additional information pertaining to interest rate derivatives.

Expense Classification
We classify as property operations expense costs incurred for property taxes, ground rents, utilities, property management, insurance, repairs, exterior and interior maintenance and tenant revenue collection losses, as well as associated labor and indirect costs attributable to these costs.

We classify as general and administrative and leasing expenses costs incurred for corporate-level management, public company administration, asset management, leasing, investor relations, marketing and corporate-level insurance (including general business, director and officers and key man life) and leasing prospects, as well as associated labor and indirect costs attributable to these costs.

Share-Based Compensation
We issued two forms of share-based compensation: restricted common shares (“restricted shares”) and performance share units (“PSUs”). We also issued options to purchase common shares of beneficial interest (“options”) in prior years. We account for share-based compensation in accordance with authoritative guidance provided by the FASB that establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, focusing primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. The guidance requires us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based generally on the fair value of the award on the grant date; such cost is then recognized over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. The guidance also requires that share-based compensation be computed based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest; as a result, future forfeitures of awards are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. If an award is voluntarily cancelled by an employee, we recognize the previously unrecognized cost associated with the original award on the date of such cancellation. We capitalize costs associated with share-based compensation attributable to employees engaged in construction and development activities.

When we adopted the authoritative guidance on accounting for share-based compensation, we elected to adopt the alternative transition method for calculating the tax effects of share-based compensation. The alternative transition method enabled us to use a simplified method to establishing the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool related to the tax effects of employee share-based compensation, which was available to absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to the adoption of this guidance.


F-17


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

We compute the fair value of options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Under that model, the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected option life is based on our historical experience of employee exercise behavior. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of our common shares of beneficial interest (“common shares”). Expected dividend yield is based on the average historical dividend yield on our common shares over a period of time ending on the grant date of the options.

We compute the fair value of PSUs using a Monte Carlo model. Under that model, the baseline common share value is based on the market value on the grant date. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of our common shares.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
We adopted guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) effective January 1, 2012 related to the presentation of comprehensive income that requires us to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  We adopted this guidance using retrospective application.  This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity.  Our adoption of this guidance did not affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or measurement of comprehensive income but did change the location of our disclosure pertaining to comprehensive income in our consolidated financial statements.
 
We adopted guidance issued by the FASB effective January 1, 2012 that amends measurement and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements to improve consistency with International Financial Reporting Standards.  In connection with our adoption of this guidance, we made an accounting policy election to use an exception provided for in the guidance with respect to measuring counterparty credit risk for derivative instruments; this election enables us to continue to measure the fair value of groups of assets and liabilities associated with derivative instruments consistently with how market participants would price the net risk exposure at the measurement date.  Our adoption of this guidance did not affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows but did result in additional disclosure pertaining to our fair value measurements.
 
We adopted guidance issued by the FASB effective January 1, 2012 relating to the testing of goodwill for impairment that permits us to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test.  This guidance eliminates the requirement to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.  Our adoption of this guidance did not materially affect our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

3.     Fair Value Measurements

Accounting standards define fair value as the exit price, or the amount that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The standards also establish a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy of these inputs is broken down into three levels: Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs include (1) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and (3) inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is most significant to the fair value measurement.

The assets held in connection with our non-qualified elective deferred compensation plan (comprised primarily of mutual funds and equity securities) and the corresponding liability to the participants are measured at fair value on a recurring basis on our consolidated balance sheet using quoted market prices, as are other marketable securities that we hold. The deferred compensation plan assets and other marketable securities are included in the line entitled restricted cash and marketable securities on our consolidated balance sheets. The offsetting liability associated with the deferred compensation plan is

F-18


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

adjusted to fair value at the end of each accounting period based on the fair value of the plan assets and reported in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The assets and corresponding liability of our non-qualified elective deferred compensation plan and other marketable securities that we hold are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair values of our interest rate derivatives are determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate market data and implied volatilities in such interest rates. While we determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our interest rate derivatives also utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default. However, as of December 31, 2012, we assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivatives and determined that these adjustments are not significant. As a result, we determined that our interest rate derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, we owned warrants to purchase 50,000 common shares in The KEYW Holding Corporation (“KEYW”) at an exercise price of $9.25 per share. KEYW is an entity supporting the intelligence community's operations and transformation to Cyber Age mission by providing engineering services and integrated platforms that support the intelligence process. We acquired these warrants in March 2010 and began accounting for such warrants as derivatives in November 2010 when KEYW became a publicly-traded company. We compute the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Under that model, the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect as of the valuation date. The expected life is based on the period of time until the expiration of the warrants. Expected volatility is based on an average of the historical volatility of companies in KEYW's industry that we deem to be comparable. Expected dividend yield is based on the dividend yield on KEYW's common shares as of the date of valuation. The warrants are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
In addition to the warrants in KEYW described above, we also owned 1.9 million shares, or approximately 7%, of KEYW's common stock at December 31, 2011 and 3.1 million shares, or approximately 12%, at December 31, 2010. Our investment in these common shares had a fair value of $13.8 million at December 31, 2011 based on the closing price of KEYW's common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market on that date and is included in the line entitled "restricted cash and marketable securities" on our consolidated balance sheet. We sold 1.2 million of these shares in 2011, resulting in $2.1 million in gain recognized. We used the equity method of accounting for our investment in the common stock until the resignation of our then Chief Executive Officer from the Board of Directors of KEYW effective July 1, 2011, at which time we began accounting for our investment in KEYW's common stock as a trading marketable equity security to be reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized through earnings. We sold our remaining 1.9 million shares in 2012 for $14.0 million. We recognized revenue from a lease with KEYW in one of our properties of $2.4 million in 2012, $780,000 in 2011 and $668,000 in 2010.

As discussed further in Note 6, our partner in a real estate joint venture has the right to require us to acquire its interest at fair value beginning in March 2020; accordingly, we classify the fair value of our partner’s interest as a redeemable noncontrolling interest in the mezzanine section of our consolidated balance sheet. We determine the fair value of the interest based on unobservable inputs after considering the assumptions that market participants would make in pricing the interest. We apply a discount rate to the estimated future cash flows allocable to our partner from the properties underlying the joint venture. Estimated cash flows used in such analyses are based on our plans for the properties and our views of market and economic conditions, and consider items such as current and future rental rates, occupancies for the properties and comparable properties and estimated operating and capital expenditures. In determining the fair value of our partner’s interest, we used a discount rate of 15.6%, which factored in risk appropriate to the level of future property development expected to be undertaken by the joint venture; a significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate used in determining the fair value would result in a significantly (lower) higher fair value. Given our reliance on the unobservable inputs, the valuations are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.


F-19


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Recurring Fair Value Measurements
 
The tables below set forth our financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the hierarchy level of inputs used in measuring their respective fair values under applicable accounting standards (in thousands):
Description
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs(Level 3)
 
Total
December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Marketable securities in deferred compensation plan (1)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mutual funds
 
$
6,275

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
6,275

Common stocks
 
298

 
—

 
—

 
298

Other
 
203

 
—

 
—

 
203

Common stock (1)
 
809

 
—

 
—

 
809

Warrants to purchase common shares in KEYW (2)
 
—

 
294

 
—

 
294

Assets
 
$
7,585

 
$
294

 
$
—

 
$
7,879

Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deferred compensation plan liability (3)
 
$
6,776

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
6,776

Interest rate derivatives
 
—

 
6,185

 
—

 
6,185

Liabilities
 
$
6,776

 
$
6,185

 
$
—

 
$
12,961

Redeemable noncontrolling interest
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
10,298

 
$
10,298

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Marketable securities in deferred compensation plan (1)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mutual funds
 
$
5,878

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
5,878

Common stocks
 
909

 
—

 
—

 
909

Other
 
801

 
—

 
—

 
801

Common stock (1)
 
13,928

 
—

 
—

 
13,928

Interest rate derivative (2)
 
—

 
716

 
 
 
716

Warrants to purchase common shares in KEYW (2)
 
—

 
125

 
—

 
125

Assets
 
$
21,516

 
$
841

 
$
—

 
$
22,357

Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deferred compensation plan liability (3)
 
$
7,588

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
7,588

Interest rate derivatives
 
—

 
30,863

 
—

 
30,863

Liabilities
 
$
7,588

 
$
30,863

 
$
—

 
$
38,451

Redeemable noncontrolling interest
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
8,908

 
$
8,908


(1)          Included in the line entitled “restricted cash and marketable securities” on our consolidated balance sheet.
(2)          Included in the line entitled “prepaid expenses and other assets” on our consolidated balance sheet.
(3)          Included in the line entitled “other liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheet.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, other assets (excluding mortgage loans receivable) and accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short maturities of these instruments.  We estimated the fair values of our mortgage loans receivable as discussed in Note 9 based on the discounted estimated future cash flows of the loans (categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy); the discount rates used approximate current market rates for loans with similar maturities and credit quality, and the estimated cash payments include scheduled principal and interest payments.  For our disclosure of debt fair values in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, we estimated the fair value of our exchangeable senior notes based on quoted market prices for publicly-traded debt (categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy) and estimated the fair value of our other debt based on the discounted estimated future cash payments to be made on such debt (categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy); the discount rates used approximate current market rates for loans, or groups of loans, with similar maturities and credit quality, and the estimated future payments include scheduled principal and interest payments.  Fair value estimates are

F-20


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

made at a specific point in time, are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment.  Settlement of such fair value amounts may not be possible and may not be a prudent management decision.
 
For additional fair value information, please refer to Note 9 for mortgage loans receivable, Note 10 for debt and Note 11 for interest rate derivatives.
 
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
 
We recognized impairment losses on certain properties and other assets associated with such properties in 2011 and 2012.  Accordingly, certain properties and related assets were adjusted to fair value.  The table below sets forth the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used by us in determining such fair values for the year ended December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
Impairment
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Significant Other
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
Losses
 
 
Identical Assets
 
Observable Inputs
 
Inputs
 
 
 
Recognized in
Description
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
2012 (1)
Assets (2):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Properties, net
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
379,684

 
$
379,684

 
$
62,702


(1) Represents impairment losses, excluding exit costs incurred of $4.2 million in 2012.
(2) Reflects balance sheet classifications of assets at time of fair value measurement, excluding the effect of held for sale classifications.

The table below sets forth quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used for the Level 3 fair value measurements reported above (dollars in thousands):
Description
 
Fair Value on 
Measurement Date
 
Valuation Technique
 
 Unobservable Input
 
Range (Weighted Average)
Properties on which impairment losses were recognized
 
$
379,684

 
Bid for properties indicative of value
 
Indicative bid (1)
 
(1)
 
 
 
 
Contract of sale
 
Contract price (1)
 
(1)
 
 
 
 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
10.0% to 11.0% (10.4%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Terminal capitalization rate
 
8.7% to 10.0% (8.9%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market rent growth rate
 
3.0% (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expense growth rate
 
3.0% (2)
 
 
 
 
Yield Analysis
 
Yield
 
12% (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market rent rate
 
$8.50 per square foot (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leasing costs
 
$20.00 per square foot (2)
(1) These fair value measurements were developed by third party sources, subject to our corroboration for reasonableness.
(2) Only one value applied for this unobservable input.

The table below sets forth the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used by us in determining such fair values for the year ended December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
Impairment
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Significant Other
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
Losses
 
 
Identical Assets
 
Observable Inputs
 
Inputs
 
 
 
Recognized in
Description
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
2011
Assets (1):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Properties, net
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
320,894

 
$
320,894

 
$
150,093

Prepaid and other assets
 
—

 
—

 
163

 
163

 
928


(1) Reflects balance sheet classifications of assets at time of fair value measurement, excluding the effect of held for sale classifications.


F-21


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

4.    Concentration of Rental Revenue

We derived large concentrations of our revenue from real estate operations from certain tenants during the periods set forth in our consolidated statements of operations. The following table summarizes the percentage of our rental revenue (which excludes tenant recoveries and other real estate operations revenue) earned from (1) individual tenants that accounted for at least 5% of our rental revenue from continuing and discontinued operations and (2) the aggregate of the five tenants from which we recognized the most rental revenue in the respective years:
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
United States Government
 
18
%
 
17
%
 
16
%
Northrop Grumman Corporation (1)
 
7
%
 
8
%
 
9
%
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
 
6
%
 
6
%
 
5
%
Computer Sciences Corporation
 
5
%
 
N/A

 
N/A

Five largest tenants
 
39
%
 
38
%
 
35
%

(1) Includes affiliated organizations and agencies and predecessor companies.

We also derived in excess of 90% of our construction contract revenue from the United States Government in each of the years set forth on the consolidated statements of operations.

In addition, we derived large concentrations of our total revenue from real estate operations (defined as the sum of rental revenue and tenant recoveries and other real estate operations revenue) from certain geographic regions. These concentrations are set forth in the segment information provided in Note 15. Several of these regions, including the Baltimore/Washington Corridor, Northern Virginia, Washington, DC - Capitol Riverfront, St. Mary's & King George Counties, Greater Baltimore, Maryland (“Greater Baltimore”) and Suburban Maryland, are within close proximity to each other, and all but two of our regions with real estate operations (San Antonio, Texas (“San Antonio”) and Colorado Springs, Colorado (“Colorado Springs”)) are located in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States.

5.    Properties, net
 
Operating properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands): 
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Land
$
427,766

 
$
472,483

Buildings and improvements
2,725,875

 
2,801,252

Less: accumulated depreciation
(555,975
)
 
(559,679
)
Operating properties, net
$
2,597,666

 
$
2,714,056

 
Projects we had in development or held for future development consisted of the following (in thousands): 
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Land
$
236,324

 
$
229,833

Construction in progress, excluding land
329,054

 
409,086

Projects in development or held for future development
$
565,378

 
$
638,919

 
2012 Dispositions and Impairments

 In April 2011, we completed a review of our portfolio and identified a number of properties that are no longer closely aligned with our strategy, and our Board of Trustees approved a plan by Management to dispose of some of these properties (the “Strategic Reallocation Plan”). In December 2011, we identified additional properties for disposal, and our Board of Trustees approved a plan by management to increase the scope of the Strategic Reallocation Plan to include the disposition of

F-22


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

additional properties.  We completed dispositions of the following properties in 2012 primarily in connection with the Strategic Reallocation Plan (dollars in thousands):
Project Name
 
Location
 
Date of Sale
 
Number of Buildings
 
Total Rentable Square Feet
 
Transaction Value
 
Gain on Disposition
White Marsh Portfolio Disposition
 
White Marsh, Maryland
 
1/30/2012
 
5

 
163,000

 
$
19,100

 
$
2,445

1101 Sentry Gateway
 
San Antonio, Texas
 
1/31/2012
 
1

 
95,000

 
13,500

 
1,739

222 and 224 Schilling Circle
 
Hunt Valley, Maryland
 
2/10/2012
 
2

 
56,000

 
4,400

 
102

15 and 45 West Gude Drive
 
Rockville, Maryland
 
5/2/2012
 
2

 
231,000

 
49,107

 
—

11800 Tech Road
 
Silver Spring, Maryland
 
6/14/2012
 
1

 
240,000

 
21,300

 
—

400 Professional Drive
 
Gaithersburg, Maryland
 
7/2/2012
 
1

 
130,000

 
16,198

 
—

July 2012 Portfolio Disposition
 
Baltimore/Washington Corridor and Greater Baltimore
 
7/24/2012
 
23

 
1,387,000

 
161,901

 
16,900

 
 
 
 
 
 
35

 
2,302,000

 
$
285,506

 
$
21,186


Each of the above dispositions represent property sales except for 400 Professional Drive, the disposition of which was completed in connection with a debt extinguishment, as described further below. We also had dispositions of non-operating properties during the year ended December 31, 2012 for aggregate transaction values totaling $28.1 million; in addition to the gain on sales reflected above, we also recognized impairment losses on certain of these sales that are disclosed below.
 
On July 2, 2012, the mortgage lender on a $15 million nonrecourse mortgage loan that was secured by our 400 Professional Drive property accepted a deed in lieu of foreclosure on the property. As a result, we transferred title to the property to the mortgage lender and we were relieved of the debt obligation plus accrued interest. As of the transfer date, the property had an estimated fair value of $11 million. Upon completion of this transfer, we recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $3.7 million, representing the difference between the mortgage loan and interest payable extinguished over the carrying value of the property transferred as of the transfer date, which included the effect of previous impairments taken.

We recognized impairment losses in 2012 in connection with the following:

•
our office properties and developable land in Greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Our Board of Trustees approved a plan by Management to shorten the holding period for these properties because they no longer meet our strategic investment criteria. We determined that the carrying amounts of these properties will not likely be recovered from the cash flows from the operations and sales of such properties over the likely remaining holding period. Accordingly, we recognized aggregate non-cash impairment losses of $46.1 million in 2012 for the amounts by which the carrying values of the properties exceeded their respective estimated fair values. These losses contemplate our expectation that we will incur future cash expenditures of approximately $25 million to complete the redevelopment of certain of these properties;
•
the Strategic Reallocation Plan of $19.0 million ($23.7 million classified as discontinued operations and including $4.2 million in exit costs), including $6.9 million pertaining to certain properties in Colorado Springs, Colorado classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012 and approximately $5.1 million related to our disposition of an additional property from which the cash flows were not sufficient to recover its carrying value; and
•
construction costs incurred on a property held for future development of $1.9 million.

The table below sets forth the impairment losses and exit costs recognized in 2012 by period of recognition and by property classification (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
12/31/2012
 
Total
Operating properties
$
11,833

 
$
2,354

 
$
55,829

 
$
247

 
$
70,263

Non-operating properties
(5,246
)
 
—

 
—

 
1,893

 
(3,353
)
Total
$
6,587

 
$
2,354

 
$
55,829

 
$
2,140

 
$
66,910



F-23


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2012 Acquisition

On July 11, 2012, we acquired 13857 McLearen Road, a 202,000 square foot office property in Herndon, Virginia that was 100% leased, for $48.3 million. The table below sets forth the allocation of the acquisition costs of this property (in thousands):
Land, operating properties
 
$
3,507

Building and improvements
 
30,177

Intangible assets on real estate acquisitions
 
14,993

Total assets
 
48,677

Below-market leases
 
(369
)
Total acquisition cost
 
$
48,308


Intangible assets recorded in connection with the above acquisition included the following (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
 Weighted Average Amortization Period (in Years)
Tenant relationship value
$
7,472

 
10
In-place lease value
7,109

 
5
Above-market leases
412

 
5
 
$
14,993

 
7

We expensed $229,000 in operating property acquisition costs in 2012 that are included in business development expenses and land carry costs on our consolidated statements of operations.

2012 Construction Activities

During 2012, we placed into service an aggregate of 371,000 square feet in four newly constructed office properties, including two properties in the Baltimore/Washington Corridor, one in Greater Baltimore and one in Northern Virginia. As of December 31, 2012, we had 11 office properties under construction, or for which we were contractually committed to construct, that we estimate will total 1.4 million square feet upon completion, including four in the Baltimore/Washington Corridor, four in Huntsville, Alabama and three in Northern Virginia. We also had redevelopment underway on two office properties in Greater Philadelphia that we estimate will total 297,000 square feet upon completion.

F-24


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


2011 Dispositions and Impairment

As discussed above, we implemented the Strategic Reallocation Plan in 2011 to dispose of office properties and land that are no longer closely aligned with our strategy. We determined that the carrying amounts of certain of the properties included in the Strategic Reallocation Plan (the “Impaired Properties”) were not likely to be recovered from the cash flows from the operations and sales of such properties over the shorter holding periods. Accordingly, we recognized aggregate non-cash impairment losses in 2011 of $122.5 million (including $67.5 million classified as discontinued operations and excluding $4.8 million in related income tax benefit) for the amounts by which the carrying values of the Impaired Properties exceeded their respective estimated fair values. We completed the sale of the following properties under the Strategic Reallocation Plan in 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Project Name
 
Location
 
Date of Sale
 
Number of Buildings
 
Total Rentable Square Feet
 
Transaction Value
 
Gain on Disposition
1344 & 1348 Ashton Road and 1350 Dorsey Road
 
Hanover, Maryland
 
5/24/2011
 
3

 
39,000

 
$
3,800

 
$
150

216 Schilling Circle
 
Hunt Valley, Maryland
 
8/23/2011
 
1

 
36,000

 
4,700

 
175

Towson Portfolio
 
Towson, Maryland
 
9/29/2011
 
4

 
179,000

 
16,000

 
1,134

11011 McCormick Road
 
Hunt Valley, Maryland
 
11/1/2011
 
1

 
57,000

 
3,450

 
822

10001 Franklin Square Drive
 
White Marsh, Maryland
 
12/13/2011
 
1

 
218,000

 
16,250

 
305

Rutherford Business Center Portfolio
 
Woodlawn, Maryland
 
12/15/2011
 
13

 
365,000

 
32,460

 
2,221

 
 
 
 
 
 
23

 
894,000

 
$
76,660

 
$
4,807


On February 15 and 17, 2011, the United States Army (the “Army”) provided us disclosures regarding the past testing and use of tactical defoliants/herbicides at a property we owned and subsequently disposed of in Cascade, Maryland that was formerly an Army base known as Fort Ritchie (“Fort Ritchie”). Upon receipt of these disclosures, we commenced a review of our development plans and prospects for the property. We believed that these disclosures by the Army were likely to cause further delays in the resolution of certain existing litigation related to the property, and that they also increased the level of uncertainty as to our ultimate development rights at the property and future residential and commercial demand for the property. We analyzed various possible outcomes and resulting cash flows expected from the operations and ultimate disposition of the property. After determining that the carrying amount of the property was not likely to be recovered from those cash flows, we recognized a non-cash impairment loss of $27.7 million in March 2011 for the amount by which the carrying value of the property exceeded its estimated fair value.

In 2011, we also recognized additional impairment losses of $803,000 on goodwill associated with operating properties.

The table below sets forth the impairment losses recognized in 2011 by period of recognition and by property classification (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2011
 
6/30/2011
 
12/31/2011
 
Total
Non-operating properties
$
27,742

 
$
13,574

 
$
39,193

 
$
80,509

Operating properties
—

 
31,031

 
39,481

 
70,512

Total
$
27,742

 
$
44,605

 
$
78,674

 
$
151,021



F-25


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2011 Acquisition

On August 9, 2011, we acquired 310 The Bridge Street, a 138,000 square foot office property in Huntsville, Alabama that was 100% leased, for $33.4 million. The table below sets forth the allocation of the acquisition costs of this property (in thousands):
Land, operating properties
 
$
261

Building and improvements
 
26,577

Intangible assets on real estate acquisitions
 
6,575

Total acquisition cost
 
$
33,413


Intangible assets recorded in connection with the above acquisitions included the following (in thousands):
 
 
 
 Weighted Average Amortization Period (in Years)
Tenant relationship value
$
3,187

 
8
In-place lease value
2,904

 
3
Above-market leases
484

 
3
 
$
6,575

 
6

We expensed $156,000 in 2011 in connection with acquisitions of operating properties that are included in business development expenses on our consolidated statements of operations.

2011 Construction Activities

During 2011, we placed into service an aggregate of 566,000 square feet in seven newly constructed office properties, including three in the Baltimore/Washington Corridor, two in Greater Baltimore, one in San Antonio and one in St. Mary’s County.

6.    Real Estate Joint Ventures
 
During the periods included herein, we had an investment in one unconsolidated real estate joint venture accounted for using the equity method of accounting.  Information pertaining to this joint venture investment is set forth below (dollars in thousands):
Investment Balance at (1)
 
Date
 
 
 
Nature of
 
Maximum Exposure
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
Acquired
 
Ownership
 
Activity
 
to Loss (2)
$
(6,420
)
 
$
(6,071
)
 
9/29/2005
 
20%
 
Operates 16 Buildings
 
$
—


(1)   The carrying amount of our investment in this joint venture was lower than our share of the equity in the joint venture by $4.5 million at December 31, 2012 and $5.2 million at December 31, 2011 due to our deferral of gain on the contribution by us of real estate into the joint venture upon its formation and our discontinuance of the equity method effective October 2012, as discussed below.  A difference will continue to exist to the extent the nature of our continuing involvement in the joint venture remains the same.
(2)   Derived from the sum of our investment balance and maximum additional unilateral capital contributions or loans required from us.  Not reported above are additional amounts that we and our partner are required to fund when needed by this joint venture; these funding requirements are proportional to our respective ownership percentages.  Also not reported above are additional unilateral contributions or loans from us, the amounts of which are uncertain, that we would be required to make if certain contingent events occur (see Note 20).

Net cash flows of the joint venture are distributed to the partners in proportion to their respective ownership interests. We did not recognized fees from the joint venture for property management, construction and leasing services we provided in 2012, 2011 and 2010.


F-26


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table sets forth condensed balance sheets for this unconsolidated real estate joint venture (in thousands):
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Properties, net
$
58,460

 
$
59,792

Other assets
4,376

 
3,529

Total assets
$
62,836

 
$
63,321

 
 
 
 
Liabilities (primarily debt)
$
72,693

 
$
67,710

Owners’ equity
(9,857
)
 
(4,389
)
Total liabilities and owners’ equity
$
62,836

 
$
63,321

 
The following table sets forth condensed statements of operations for this unconsolidated real estate joint venture (in thousands):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Revenues
 
$
7,316

 
$
7,577

 
$
8,405

Property operating expenses
 
(2,829
)
 
(3,673
)
 
(3,600
)
Interest expense
 
(7,672
)
 
(3,913
)
 
(3,937
)
Depreciation and amortization expense
 
(2,283
)
 
(2,463
)
 
(3,154
)
Net loss
 
$
(5,468
)
 
$
(2,472
)
 
$
(2,286
)
 
We historically accounted for the investment in our one unconsolidated real estate joint venture using the equity method of accounting primarily because: (1) we share with our partner the power to direct the matters that most significantly impact the activities of the joint venture, including the management and operations of the properties and disposal rights with respect to such properties; and (2) our partner has the right to receive benefits and absorb losses that could be significant to the VIE through its proportionately larger investment. We deferred gain in a prior period on our initial contribution of property to the joint venture due to certain guarantees described in Note 20, and we subsequently recognized losses in excess of our investment due to such guarantees and our intent to support the joint venture. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the holder of mortgage debt encumbering all of the joint venture’s properties notified us of the debt’s default, initiated foreclosure proceedings and terminated our property management responsibilities; accordingly, we discontinued our application of the equity method to this investment effective in October 2012 due to our having neither the obligation nor intent to support the joint venture.

The table below sets forth information pertaining to our investments in consolidated real estate joint ventures at December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Nominal
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ownership
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
(1)
 
 
Date
 
% at
 
 
 
Total
 
Encumbered
 
Total
 
 
Acquired
 
12/31/2012
 
Nature of Activity
 
Assets
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
LW Redstone Company, LLC
 
3/23/2010
 
85%
 
Developing business park (2)
 
$
76,295

 
$
16,809

 
$
12,990

M Square Associates, LLC
 
6/26/2007
 
50%
 
Operating two buildings and developing others (3)
 
60,798

 
47,360

 
43,149

Arundel Preserve #5, LLC
 
7/2/2007
 
50%
 
Operating one building (4)
 
39,581

 
36,811

 
17,722

COPT-FD Indian Head, LLC
 
10/23/2006
 
75%
 
Holding land parcel (5)
 
6,436

 
—

 
16

MOR Forbes 2 LLC
 
12/24/2002
 
50%
 
Operating one building (6)
 
3,879

 
—

 
96

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
186,989

 
$
100,980

 
$
73,973

(1) Excludes amounts eliminated in consolidation.
(2) This joint venture’s property is in Huntsville, Alabama.
(3) This joint venture’s properties are in College Park, Maryland (in the Suburban Maryland region).
(4) This joint venture’s property is in Hanover, Maryland (in the Baltimore/Washington Corridor).
(5) This joint venture’s property is in Charles County, Maryland. In 2012, the joint venture exercised its option under a development agreement to require Charles County to repurchase the land parcel at its original acquisition cost. Under the terms of the agreement with Charles County, the repurchase is expected to occur by August 2014.
(6) This joint venture’s property is in Lanham, Maryland (in the Suburban Maryland region).

 

F-27


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

With regard to our consolidated joint ventures:

•
For LW Redstone, LLC, we anticipate funding certain infrastructure costs (up to a maximum of $76.0 million) that we expect will be reimbursed by the City of Huntsville; as of December 31, 2012, we had advanced $33.3 million to the City to fund such costs (included in prepaid expenses and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet).  We also expect to fund additional development and construction costs through equity contributions to the extent that third party financing is not obtained.  Our partner was credited with a $9.0 million capital account upon formation and is not required to make any future equity contributions. While net cash flow distributions to the partners vary depending on the source of the funds distributed, cash flows are generally distributed as follows:
•
cumulative preferred returns on capital invested to fund the project’s infrastructure costs on a pro rata basis to us and our partner;
•
cumulative preferred returns on our capital invested to fund the project’s vertical construction;
•
return of our invested capital;
•
return of our partner’s capital;
•
any remaining residual 85% to us and 15% to our partner.
Our partner has the right to require us to acquire its interest for fair value beginning in March 2020; accordingly, we classify the fair value of our partner’s interest as redeemable noncontrolling interests in the mezzanine section of our consolidated balance sheet. We have the right to purchase our partner’s interest at fair value upon the earlier of five years following the project’s achievement of a construction commencement threshold of 4.4 million square feet or March 2040.
•
For M Square Associates, LLC, net cash flows of this entity will be distributed to the partners as follows: (1) member loans and accrued interest; (2) our preferred return and capital contributions used to fund infrastructure costs; (3) the partners' preferred returns and capital contributions used to fund all other costs, including the base land value credit, in proportion to the accrued returns and capital accounts; and (4) residual amounts distributed 50% to each member.
•
For Arundel Preserve #5, LLC, net cash flows will be distributed to the partners as follows: (1) member loans and accrued interest; (2) preferred returns in proportion to the partners' respective capital accounts; (3) repayment of any building operating reserves funded by us; and (4) residual cash flows in proportion to the partners' respective ownership interests.
•
For COPT-FD Indian Head, LLC, net cash flows will be distributed to the partners in proportion to their respective ownership interests.
•
For MOR Forbes 2 LLC, net cash flows will be distributed to the partners in proportion to their respective ownership interests.

We consolidate these real estate joint ventures because we have: (1) the power to direct the matters that most significantly impact the activities of the joint ventures, including development, leasing and management of the properties constructed by the VIEs; and (2) the right to receive returns on our fundings and, in many cases, the obligation to fund the activities of the ventures to the extent that third-party financing is not obtained, both of which could be potentially significant to the VIEs.

Our commitments and contingencies pertaining to our real estate joint ventures are disclosed in Note 20.

7.    Intangible Assets on Real Estate Acquisitions

Intangible assets on real estate acquisitions consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 Carrying Amount
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
Carrying Amount
In-place lease value
 
$
134,964

 
$
93,362

 
$
41,602

 
$
151,361

 
$
97,594

 
$
53,767

Tenant relationship value
 
46,828

 
23,346

 
23,482

 
45,940

 
23,246

 
22,694

Above-market cost arrangements
 
12,416

 
4,100

 
8,316

 
12,416

 
2,857

 
9,559

Above-market leases
 
8,925

 
7,432

 
1,493

 
10,118

 
8,037

 
2,081

Market concentration premium
 
1,333

 
347

 
986

 
1,333

 
314

 
1,019

 
 
$
204,466

 
$
128,587

 
$
75,879

 
$
221,168

 
$
132,048

 
$
89,120

Amortization of the intangible asset categories set forth above totaled $21.4 million in 2012, $28.3 million in 2011 and $28.3 million in 2010. The approximate weighted average amortization periods of the categories set forth above follow: in-place lease value: seven years; tenant relationship value: eight years; above-market cost arrangements: 28 years; above-market leases: four years; and market concentration premium: 30 years. The approximate weighted average amortization period for all of the

F-28


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

categories combined is ten years. Estimated amortization expense associated with the intangible asset categories set forth above for the next five years is: $14.4 million for 2013; $12.3 million for 2014; $10.6 million for 2015; $9.5 million for 2016; and $7.1 million for 2017.

8.    Deferred Leasing and Financing Costs
Deferred leasing and financing costs, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
Deferred leasing costs
 
$
97,852

 
$
96,140

Deferred financing costs
 
30,520

 
44,159

Accumulated amortization
 
(68,420
)
 
(73,784
)
Deferred leasing and financing costs, net
 
$
59,952

 
$
66,515

9.    Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Mortgage and other investing receivables
$
33,396

 
$
27,998

Prepaid expenses
19,270

 
20,035

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net
7,991

 
10,177

Deferred tax asset
6,612

 
6,923

Lease incentives
5,578

 
5,233

Other assets
4,608

 
13,284

Prepaid expenses and other assets
$
77,455

 
$
83,650

 
Mortgage and Other Investing Receivables
 
Mortgage and other investing receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Notes receivable from City of Huntsville
$
33,252

 
$
17,741

Mortgage loans receivable
144

 
10,257

 
$
33,396

 
$
27,998

 
Our notes receivable from the City of Huntsville funded infrastructure costs in connection with our LW Redstone Company, LLC joint venture (see Note 6).  As of December 31, 2012, our mortgage loans receivable reflected above consisted of one loan secured by a property in Greater Baltimore.  We did not have an allowance for credit losses in connection with these receivables at December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.  The fair value of our mortgage and other investing receivables totaled $33.4 million at December 31, 2012 and $28.0 million at December 31, 2011.

Operating Notes Receivable
 
We had operating notes receivable due from tenants with terms exceeding one year totaling $271,000 at December 31, 2012 and $530,000 at December 31, 2011.  We carried allowances for estimated losses for most of these balances.


F-29


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

10.    Debt
 
Our debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
Maximum
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Availability at
 
Carrying Value at
 
 
 
Scheduled Maturity
 
December 31,
2012
 
December 31,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
 
Stated Interest Rates at
 
 Dates at
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2012
Mortgage and Other Secured Loans:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Fixed rate mortgage loans (1)
N/A

 
$
948,414

 
$
1,052,421

 
5.20% - 7.87% (2)
 
2013-2034
Variable rate secured loans
N/A

 
38,475

 
39,213

 
LIBOR + 2.25% (3)
 
2015
Other construction loan facilities
$
123,802

 
29,557

 
40,336

 
LIBOR + 1.95% to 2.75% (4)
 
2013-2015
Total mortgage and other secured loans
 

 
1,016,446

 
1,131,970

 
 
 
 
Revolving Credit Facility
800,000

 
—

 
662,000

 
LIBOR + 1.75% to 2.50%
 
September 1, 2014
Term Loan Facilities
770,000

 
770,000

 
400,000

 
LIBOR + 1.65% to 2.60% (5)
 
2015-2019
Unsecured notes payable
N/A

 
1,788

 
5,050

 
0% (6)
 
2026
4.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes
N/A

 
230,934

 
227,283

 
4.25%
 
April 2030 (7)
Total debt
 

 
$
2,019,168

 
$
2,426,303

 
 
 
 

(1)  
Several of the fixed rate mortgages carry interest rates that were above or below market rates upon assumption and therefore were recorded at their fair value based on applicable effective interest rates.  The carrying values of these loans reflect net unamortized premiums totaling $1.3 million at December 31, 2012 and $2.4 million at December 31, 2011.
(2)
The weighted average interest rate on these loans was 6.01% at December 31, 2012.
(3) 
The interest rate on the loan outstanding was 2.46% at December 31, 2012.
(4) 
The weighted average interest rate on these loans was 2.66% at December 31, 2012.
(5) 
The weighted average interest rate on these loans was 2.17% at December 31, 2012.
(6)  
These notes carry interest rates that were below market rates upon assumption and therefore were recorded at their fair value based on applicable effective interest rates.  The carrying value of these notes reflects an unamortized discount totaling $873,000 at December 31, 2012 and $1.8 million at December 31, 2011.
(7)
Refer to the paragraph below for descriptions of provisions for early redemption and repurchase of these notes.

Effective September 1, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement providing for an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders for which J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and KeyBanc Capital Markets acted as join lead arrangers and joint book runners, KeyBank National Association acted as administrative agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. acted as co-syndication agents. The lenders’ aggregate commitment under the facility was $1.0 billion, with the ability for us to increase the lenders’ aggregate commitment to $1.5 billion, provided that there is no default under the facility and subject to the approval of the lenders. Effective August 10, 2012, we exercised our right to reduce the lenders’ aggregate commitment under the facility from $1.0 billion to $800 million, with the ability for us to increase the lenders’ aggregate commitment to $1.3 billion, provided that there is no default under the facility and subject to the approval of the lenders. Amounts available under the facility are computed based on 60% of our unencumbered asset value, as defined in the agreement.  The facility matures on September 1, 2014, and may be extended by one year at our option, provided that there is no default under the facility and we pay an extension fee of 0.20% of the total availability of the facility.  The interest rate on the facility is based on LIBOR (customarily the 30-day rate) plus 1.75% to 2.50%, as determined by our leverage levels. The facility also carries a quarterly fee that is based on the unused amount of the facility multiplied by a per annum rate of 0.25% to 0.35%, as determined by the level of our unused amount. As of December 31, 2012, the maximum borrowing capacity under this facility totaled $800.0 million, of which $792.3 million was available.

Effective September 1, 2011, we entered into an unsecured term loan agreement with the same group of lenders as the Revolving Credit Facility under which we borrowed $400.0 million, with a right for us to borrow an additional $100.0 million, provided that there is no default under the agreement. The term loan matures on September 1, 2015, and may be extended by one year at our option, provided that there is no default and we pay an extension fee of 0.20% of the total availability of the agreement. The variable interest rate on the term loan is based on LIBOR rate (customarily the 30-day rate) plus 1.65% to 2.40%, as determined by our leverage levels.

Upon entry into the Revolving Credit Facility and term loan on September 1, 2011, we repaid and extinguished our previously existing Revolving Credit Facility and Revolving Construction Facility and used most of the remaining proceeds to

F-30


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

repay two variable rate secured loans totaling $270.3 million. Upon the early extinguishment of this debt, we recognized a loss of $1.7 million, representing unamortized issuance costs.

Effective February 14, 2012, we entered into an unsecured term loan agreement with a group of lenders for which J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and KeyBank Capital Markets acted as joint lead arrangers and joint book runners, KeyBank National Association acted as administrative agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. acted as syndication agent.  We borrowed $250.0 million under the term loan.  The term loan matures on February 14, 2017.  The variable interest rate on the loan is based on the LIBOR rate (customarily the 30-day rate) plus 1.65% to 2.40%, as determined by our leverage levels.

Effective August 3, 2012, we entered into an unsecured term loan agreement with a group of lenders for which Wells Fargo Securities, LLC acted as sole arranger and sole book runner, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association acted as administrative agent and Capital One, N.A. acted as documentation agent.  We borrowed $120.0 million under the term loan, with the ability for us to borrow an additional $80.0 million, provided that there is no default under the loan and subject to the approval of the lenders.  The term loan matures on August 2, 2019.  The variable interest rate on the loan is based on the LIBOR rate (customarily the 30-day rate) plus 2.10% to 2.60%, as determined by our leverage levels.

In 2010, the Operating Partnership issued a $240.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2030.  Interest on the notes is payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year.  These notes have an exchange settlement feature that provides that the notes may, under certain circumstances, be exchangeable for cash and, at the Operating Partnership’s discretion, our common shares at an exchange rate (subject to adjustment) of 20.8513 shares per one thousand dollar principal amount of the notes (exchange rate is as of December 31, 2012 and is equivalent to an exchange price of $47.96 per common share) (the initial exchange rate of the notes was based on a 20% premium over the closing price on the NYSE on the transaction pricing date).  On or after April 20, 2015, the Operating Partnership may redeem the notes in cash in whole or in part. The holders of the notes have the right to require us to repurchase the notes in cash in whole or in part on each of April 15, 2015, April 15, 2020 and April 15, 2025, or in the event of a “fundamental change,” as defined under the terms of the notes, for a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.  The notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Operating Partnership and rank equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness of the Operating Partnership and are guaranteed by us. The carrying value of these notes included a principal amount of $240 million and an unamortized discount totaling $9.1 million at December 31, 2012 and $12.7 million at December 31, 2011.  The effective interest rate under the notes, including amortization of the issuance costs, was 6.05%.  Because the closing price of our common shares at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was less than the exchange price per common share applicable to these notes, the if-converted value of the notes did not exceed the principal amount.  The table below sets forth interest expense recognized on these notes before deductions for amounts capitalized (in thousands):
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Interest expense at stated interest rate
$
10,200

 
$
10,200

 
$
7,480

Interest expense associated with amortization of discount
3,651

 
3,437

 
2,445

Total
$
13,851

 
$
13,637

 
$
9,925



F-31


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Until September 15, 2011, the Operating Partnership had $162.5 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2026. These notes had an exchange settlement feature that provided that the notes were, under certain circumstances, exchangeable for cash (up to the principal amount of the notes) and, with respect to any excess exchange value, were exchangeable into (at our option) cash, our common shares or a combination of cash and our common shares. On September 15, 2011, we repurchased these notes at 100% of the principal amount of $162.5 million after the holders of such notes surrendered them for repurchase pursuant to the terms of the notes and the related Indenture. The effective interest rate under the notes, including amortization of the issuance costs, was 5.97%. Because the closing price of our common shares at December 31, 2011 was less than the exchange price per common share applicable to these notes, the if-converted value of the notes did not exceed the principal amount. The table below sets forth interest expense recognized on these notes before deductions for amounts capitalized:
 
 
For the Years Ended
 
December 31,
 
 
2011
 
2010
Interest expense at stated interest rate
 
$
4,013

 
$
5,687

Interest expense associated with amortization of discount
 
2,617

 
3,736

Total
 
$
6,630

 
$
9,423


Certain of our debt instruments require that we comply with a number of restrictive financial covenants, including maximum leverage ratio, unencumbered leverage ratio, minimum net worth, minimum fixed charge coverage, minimum unencumbered interest coverage ratio, minimum debt service and maximum secured indebtedness ratio. As of December 31, 2012, we were within the compliance requirements of these financial covenants.

Our debt matures on the following schedule (in thousands):
2013
$
121,129

(1)
2014
158,341

 
2015
795,802

(2)
2016
278,642

 
2017
551,388

 
Thereafter
122,490

 
Total
$
2,027,792

(3)
(1) Includes $17.5 million that may be extended for one year, subject to certain conditions.
(2) Includes $411.1 million that may be extended for one year, subject to certain conditions.
(3) Represents scheduled principal amortization and maturities only and therefore excludes net discounts of $8.6 million.

Weighted average borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facilities totaled $276.5 million in 2012 and $482.3 million in 2011. The weighted average interest rate on our Revolving Credit Facilities was 2.27% in 2012 and 1.65% in 2011.

We capitalized interest costs of $13.9 million in 2012, $17.4 million in 2011 and $16.5 million in 2010.

The following table sets forth information pertaining to the fair value of our debt (in thousands): 
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
Carrying
 
Estimated
 
Carrying
 
Estimated
 
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Amount
 
Fair Value
Fixed-rate debt
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

4.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes
$
230,934

 
$
240,282

 
$
227,283

 
$
238,077

Other fixed-rate debt
950,202

 
968,180

 
1,057,471

 
1,054,424

Variable-rate debt
838,032

 
845,558

 
1,141,549

 
1,139,856

 
$
2,019,168

 
$
2,054,020

 
$
2,426,303

 
$
2,432,357

 


F-32


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

11.    Interest Rate Derivatives
 
The following table sets forth the key terms and fair values of our interest rate swap derivatives (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value at
Notional
 
 
 
 
 
Effective
 
Expiration
 
December 31,
Amount
 
Fixed Rate
 
Floating Rate Index
 
Date
 
Date
 
2012
 
2011
$
100,000

 
0.6123
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2012
 
9/1/2014
 
$
(594
)
 
$
55

100,000

 
0.6100
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2012
 
9/1/2014
 
(591
)
 
56

100,000

 
0.8320
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2012
 
9/1/2015
 
(1,313
)
 
(66
)
100,000

 
0.8320
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2012
 
9/1/2015
 
(1,313
)
 
(49
)
38,475

(1)
3.8300
%
 
One-Month LIBOR + 2.25%
 
11/2/2010
 
11/2/2015
 
(1,268
)
 
(1,054
)
100,000

 
0.8055
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
9/2/2014
 
9/1/2016
 
(263
)
 
—

100,000

 
0.8100
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
9/2/2014
 
9/1/2016
 
(272
)
 
—

100,000

 
1.6730
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
9/1/2015
 
8/1/2019
 
(154
)
 
—

100,000

 
1.7300
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
9/1/2015
 
8/1/2019
 
(417
)
 
—

50,000

 
0.5025
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2011
 
1/3/2012
 
—

 
(1
)
50,000

 
0.5025
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/3/2011
 
1/3/2012
 
—

 
(1
)
120,000

 
1.7600
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/2/2009
 
5/1/2012
 
—

 
(552
)
100,000

 
1.9750
%
 
One-Month LIBOR
 
1/1/2010
 
5/1/2012
 
—

 
(532
)
100,000

(2)
3.8415
%
 
Three-Month LIBOR
 
9/30/2011
 
9/30/2021
 
—

 
(16,333
)
75,000

(2)
3.8450
%
 
Three-Month LIBOR
 
9/30/2011
 
9/30/2021
 
—

 
(12,275
)
100,000

(2)
2.0525
%
 
Three-Month LIBOR-Reverse
 
12/30/2011
 
9/30/2021
 
—

 
345

75,000

(2)
2.0525
%
 
Three-Month LIBOR-Reverse
 
12/30/2011
 
9/30/2021
 
—

 
260

 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(6,185
)
 
$
(30,147
)

(1)
The notional amount of this instrument is scheduled to amortize to $36.2 million.
(2)
As described below, we settled these instruments on January 5, 2012, along with interest accrued thereon, for an aggregate of $29.7 million.  Our policy is to present payments to terminate interest rate swaps entered into in order to hedge forecasted interest payments as operating activities on our consolidated statement of cash flows.  Accordingly, the payments to settle these instruments were included in net cash provided by operating activities on our consolidated statement of cash flows.

Each of the one-month LIBOR interest rate swaps set forth in the table above was designated as a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk.

On April 5, 2011, we entered into the two forward starting three-month LIBOR swaps set forth above with an effective date of September 30, 2011 for an aggregate notional amount of $175 million. We designated these swaps as cash flow hedges of interest payments on ten-year, fixed-rate borrowings forecasted to occur between August 2011 and April 2012.  After meeting with our Board of Trustees on December 21, 2011, we determined that we would pursue other financing options and concluded that the originally forecasted borrowings were expected not to occur.  Accordingly, the swaps no longer qualified for hedge accounting. On December 22, 2011, we entered into the two reverse three-month LIBOR swaps set forth above with an effective date of December 30, 2011 for an aggregate notional amount of $175 million in order to remove the majority of the variability in the termination value of the forward starting swaps entered into on April 5, 2011. We recognized aggregate net losses of $29.8 million on these interest rate swaps in December 2011. On January 5, 2012, we settled all of the forward starting swaps entered into on April 5, 2011 and December 22, 2011 and interest accrued thereon for an aggregate of $29.7 million.


F-33


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The table below sets forth the fair value of our interest rate derivatives as well as their classification on our consolidated balance sheet (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
Derivatives
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair Value
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair Value
Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
 
$
—

 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
 
$
111

Interest rate swaps not designated as hedges
 
N/A
 
—

 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
 
605

Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges
 
Interest rate derivatives
 
(6,185
)
 
Interest rate derivatives
 
(2,255
)
Interest rate swaps not designated as hedges
 
N/A
 
—

 
Interest rate derivatives
 
(28,608
)
 
The table below presents the effect of our interest rate derivatives on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (in thousands):
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Amount of loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”) (effective portion)
$
(7,676
)
 
$
(31,531
)
 
$
(5,473
)
Amount of loss reclassified from AOCL into interest expense (effective portion)
(3,697
)
 
(4,601
)
 
(3,689
)
Amount of loss reclassified from AOCL to loss on interest rate derivatives upon discontinuing hedge accounting
—

 
28,430

 
—

Amount of loss on interest rate derivatives recognized subsequent to such derivatives no longer being designated as hedges
—

 
1,375

 
—


Over the next 12 months, we estimate that approximately $2.6 million will be reclassified from AOCL as an increase to interest expense.

We have agreements with each of our interest rate derivative counterparties that contain provisions under which, if we default or are capable of being declared in default on any of our indebtedness, we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations.  These agreements also incorporate the loan covenant provisions of our indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the derivative counterparties.  Failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions could result in our being declared in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreements.  As of December 31, 2012, the fair value of interest rate derivatives in a liability position related to these agreements was $6.2 million, excluding the effects of accrued interest. As of December 31, 2012, we had not posted any collateral related to these agreements.  We are not in default with any of these provisions.  If we breached any of these provisions, we could be required to settle our obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $6.4 million.
 
12.    Shareholders’ Equity

Preferred Shares

At December 31, 2012, we had 25.0 million preferred shares of beneficial interest (“preferred shares”) authorized at $0.01 par value. The table below sets forth additional information pertaining to our preferred shares (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Series
 
# of Shares Issued
 
Aggregate Liquidation Preference
 
Month of Issuance
 
Annual Dividend Yield
 
 Annual Dividend Per Share
 
Earliest Redemption Date
Series H
 
2,000,000

 
$
50,000

 
December 2003
 
7.500
%
 
$
1.87500

 
12/18/2008
Series J
 
3,390,000

 
84,750

 
July 2006
 
7.625
%
 
$
1.90625

 
7/20/2011
Series K
 
531,667

 
26,583

 
January 2007
 
5.600
%
 
$
2.80000

 
1/9/2017
Series L
 
6,900,000

 
172,500

 
June 2012
 
7.375
%
 
$
1.84375

 
6/27/2017
 
 
12,821,667

 
$
333,833

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Each series of preferred shares is nonvoting and redeemable for cash in the amount of its liquidation preference at our option on or after the earliest redemption date. The Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares are also convertible,

F-34


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

subject to certain conditions, into common shares on the basis of 0.8163 common shares for each preferred share. Holders of all preferred shares are entitled to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly (as and if declared by our Board of Trustees). In the case of each series of preferred shares, there is a series of preferred units in the Operating Partnership owned by us that carries substantially the same terms.
 
On June 27, 2012, we completed the public offering of 6.9 million Series L Cumulative Preferred Shares of beneficial interest (“Series L Preferred Shares”) at a price of $25.00 per share for net proceeds of $165.7 million after underwriting discounts but before offering expenses. We contributed the net proceeds from the sale to our Operating Partnership in exchange for 6.9 million Series L Preferred Units. The Series L Preferred Units carry terms that are substantially the same as the Series L Preferred Shares.

On August 6, 2012, we redeemed all of our outstanding 8% Series G Preferred Shares of beneficial interest (the “Series G Preferred Shares”) at a price of $25.00 per share, or $55.0 million in the aggregate, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon through the date of redemption. We recognized a $1.8 million decrease to net income available to common shareholders pertaining to the original issuance costs incurred on the Series G Preferred Shares at the time of the redemption.

Common Shares

During 2011 and 2012, we completed the following public offerings of common shares:

•
4.6 million common shares in May 2011 at a public offering price of $33.00 per share for net proceeds of $145.7 million after underwriter discounts but before offering expenses; and
•
8.6 million common shares in October 2012 at a public offering price of $24.75 per share for net proceeds of $204.9 million after underwriter discounts but before offering expenses.

In October 2012, we established an at-the-market (“ATM”) stock offering program under which we may, from time to time, offer and sell common shares in “at the market” stock offerings having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $150.0 million. We completed no sales of shares under this program in 2012.

Holders of common units in our Operating Partnership converted their units into common shares on the basis of one common share for each common unit in the amount of 234,246 in 2012 and 100,939 in 2011.

We declared dividends per common share of $1.10 in 2012, $1.65 in 2011 and $1.61 in 2010.

See Note 13 for disclosure of common share activity pertaining to our share-based compensation plans.

13.    Share-Based Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans
 
Share-Based Compensation Plans
 
In May 2010, we adopted the Amended and Restated 2008 Omnibus Equity and Incentive Plan. We may issue equity-based awards under this plan to officers, employees, non-employee trustees and any other key persons of us and our subsidiaries, as defined in the plan. The plan provides for a maximum of 5,900,000 common shares of beneficial interest to be issued in the form of options, share appreciation rights, deferred share awards, restricted share awards, unrestricted share awards, performance shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards and for the granting of cash-based awards. The plan expires on May 13, 2020.

In March 1998, we adopted a long-term incentive plan for our Trustees and employees. This plan, which expired in March 2008, provided for the award of options, restricted shares and dividend equivalents.

Grants of restricted shares and options under these plans to nonemployee Trustees generally vest on the first anniversary of the grant date provided that the Trustee remains in his or her position. Restricted shares and options granted to employees vest based on increments and over periods of time set forth under the terms of the respective awards provided that the employees remain employed by us. Options expire ten years after the date of grant. Shares for each of our share-based compensation plans are issued under registration statements on Form S-8 that became effective upon filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

F-35


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


The following table summarizes restricted share transactions under our share-based compensation plans for 2010, 2011 and 2012:
 
 
 Shares
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2009
 
668,990

 
$
30.43

Granted
 
290,956

 
37.74

Forfeited
 
(13,986
)
 
34.38

Vested
 
(276,102
)
 
32.24

Unvested at December 31, 2010
 
669,858

 
32.77

Granted
 
320,284

 
33.68

Forfeited
 
(18,058
)
 
34.23

Vested
 
(323,706
)
 
32.86

Unvested at December 31, 2011
 
648,378

 
33.13

Granted
 
177,662

 
23.64

Forfeited
 
(17,019
)
 
31.43

Vested
 
(374,378
)
 
32.72

Unvested at December 31, 2012
 
434,643

 
$
29.67

Restricted shares expected to vest
 
419,014

 
$
29.73


The aggregate intrinsic value of restricted shares that vested was $9.0 million in 2012, $11.2 million in 2011 and $10.3 million in 2010.

Our Board of Trustees made the following grants of Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) to executives:

•
100,645 PSUs on March 4, 2010 (the “2010 PSU Grants”) with an aggregate grant date fair value of $5.4 million. Certain executives voluntarily cancelled 58,105 of these PSUs in 2011; we recognized a non-cash compensation charge of $1.2 million in 2011 in connection with these PSU cancellations. The remaining PSUs at December 31, 2011 were held by Mr. Randall M. Griffin, our former Chief Executive Officer, and were terminated upon his retirement on March 31, 2012; based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to its peer group of companies, there was no payout value in connection with the termination of the PSUs;
•
56,883 PSUs on March 3, 2011 (the “2011 PSU Grants”) with an aggregate grant date fair value of $2.8 million which were all outstanding at December 31, 2012; and
•
54,070 PSUs on March 1, 2012, (the “2012 PSU Grants”) with an aggregate grant date fair value of $1.8 million which were all outstanding at December 31, 2012. 

The PSUs have a performance period beginning on the respective grant dates and concluding on the earlier of three years from the respective grant dates or the date of: (1) termination by the Company without cause, death or disability of the executive or constructive discharge of the executive (collectively, “qualified termination”); or (2) a sale event.  The number of PSUs earned (“earned PSUs”) at the end of the performance period will be determined based on the percentile rank of the Company’s total shareholder return relative to a peer group of companies, as set forth in the following schedule:
Percentile Rank
 
Earned PSUs Payout %
75th or greater
 
200% of PSUs granted
50th or greater
 
100% of PSUs granted
25th
 
50% of PSUs granted
Below 25th
 
0% of PSUs granted

If the percentile rank exceeds the 25th percentile and is between two of the percentile ranks set forth in the table above, then the percentage of the earned PSUs will be interpolated between the ranges set forth in the table above to reflect any performance between the listed percentiles.  At the end of the performance period, we, in settlement of the award, will issue a number of fully-vested common shares equal to the sum of:


F-36


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

•
the number of earned PSUs in settlement of the award plan; plus
•
the aggregate dividends that would have been paid with respect to the common shares issued in settlement of the earned PSUs through the date of settlement had such shares been issued on the grant date, divided by the share price on such settlement date, as defined under the terms of the agreement.
 
If a performance period ends due to a sale event or qualified termination, the number of earned PSUs is prorated based on the portion of the three-year performance period that has elapsed.  If employment is terminated by the employee or by the Company for cause, all PSUs are forfeited.  PSUs do not carry voting rights.
 
We computed grant date fair values for PSUs using Monte Carlo models and are recognizing these values over three-year periods that commenced on the respective grant dates. The grant date fair value and certain of the assumptions used in the Monte Carlo models for PSUs granted in 2010, 2011 and 2012 are set forth below:
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Grant date fair value
 
$
32.77

 
$
49.15

 
$
53.31

Baseline common share value
 
$
24.39

 
$
35.17

 
$
37.84

Expected volatility of common shares
 
43.2
%
 
61.1
%
 
62.2
%
Risk-free interest rate
 
0.41
%
 
1.32
%
 
1.38
%

The following table summarizes option transactions under our share-based compensation plans for 2010, 2011 and 2012 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
 
 
 Shares
 
Range of Exercise Price per Share
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share
 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in Years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
 
1,501,906

 
$8.63 - $57.00
 
$
30.29

 
5
 
$
14,579

Forfeited/Expired – 2010
 
(34,966
)
 
$41.33 - $49.60
 
$
46.59

 
 
 
 
Exercised – 2010
 
(278,656
)
 
$8.63 - $42.07
 
$
16.42

 
 
 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
 
1,188,284

 
$9.54 - $57.00
 
$
33.07

 
5
 
$
7,987

Forfeited/Expired – 2011
 
(51,598
)
 
$22.49 - $50.59
 
$
42.82

 
 
 
 
Exercised – 2011
 
(191,264
)
 
$9.54 - $30.25
 
$
12.82

 
 
 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
 
945,422

 
$13.40 - $57.00
 
$
36.63

 
4
 
$
510

Forfeited/Expired – 2012
 
(85,588
)
 
$25.52 - $57.00
 
$
42.98

 
 
 
 
Exercised – 2012
 
(61,624
)
 
$13.40 - $22.49
 
$
15.08

 
 
 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
 
798,210

 
$13.60 - $57.00
 
$
37.62

 
3
 
$
325

Exercisable at December 31, 2010
 
1,188,284

 
(1)
 
$
33.07

 
 
 
 
Exercisable at December 31, 2011
 
945,422

 
(2)
 
$
36.63

 
 
 
 
Exercisable at December 31, 2012
 
798,210

 
(3)
 
$
37.62

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)
231,946 of these options had an exercise price ranging from $9.54 to $16.73; 246,103 had an exercise price ranging from $16.74 to $30.04; 205,012 had an exercise price ranging from $30.05 to $41.28; 253,607 had an exercise price ranging from $41.29 to $45.24; and 251,616 had an exercise price ranging from $45.25 to $57.00.
(2)
53,957 of these options had an exercise price ranging from $13.40 to $16.73; 225,903 had an exercise price ranging from $16.74 to $30.04; 198,762 had an exercise price ranging from $30.05 to $41.28; and 466,800 had an exercise price ranging from $41.29 to $57.00.
(3)
9,500 of these options had an exercise price ranging from $13.60 to $16.73; 204,736 had an exercise price ranging from $16.74 to $30.04; 180,962 had an exercise price ranging from $30.05 to $41.28; and 403,012 had an exercise price ranging from $41.29 to $57.00.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $553,000 in 2012, $4.0 million in 2011 and $5.9 million in 2010.


F-37


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

We own a taxable REIT subsidiary that is subject to Federal and state income taxes. We realized a windfall tax benefit of $43,000 in 2012 and $47,000 in 2011 on options exercised and vesting restricted shares in connection with employees of that subsidiary.

The table below sets forth our reporting for share based compensation expense (in thousands):
 
 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
General, administrative and leasing expenses
 
$
8,611

 
$
9,077

 
$
7,511

Property operating expenses
 
1,371

 
2,843

 
2,543

Capitalized to development activities
 
1,202

 
2,347

 
1,791

Share-based compensation expense
 
$
11,184

 
$
14,267

 
$
11,845


The amounts included in our consolidated statements of operations for share-based compensation reflected an estimate of pre-vesting forfeitures of: 0% for all PSUs; 0% to 5% for restricted shares for 2012; and 0% to 4% for restricted shares for 2011 and 2010.

As of December 31, 2012, all of our options are vested and fully expensed. As of December 31, 2012, there was $6.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted shares that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years. As of December 31, 2012, there was $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to PSUs that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average performance period of approximately two years.

401(k) Plan

We have a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all of our employees that permits participants to contribute up to 90% of their compensation, as defined in the Plan, per pay period on a before-tax basis or after-tax basis, or a combination of both, subject to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ( the “IRC”), as amended. Participants who are 50 years of age or older by the end of a particular plan year and have contributed the maximum 401(k) deferral amount allowed under the plan for that year are eligible to contribute an additional portion of their annual compensation on a before-tax basis as catch-up contributions, up to the annual limit under the IRC. We match 100% of the first 1% of pre-tax and/or after-tax contributions that participants contribute to the plan and 50% of the next 5% in participant contributions to the plan (representing an aggregate match by us of 3.5% on the first 6% of participant pre-tax and/or after-tax contributions to the plan).  Participants’ contributions are fully vested. Participants are 50% vested in Company matching contributions after one year of credited service and 100% vested after two years of credited service. We fund all contributions with cash. Our matching contributions under the plan totaled approximately $1.1 million in 2012, $1.1 million in 2011 and $1.0 million in 2010. The 401(k) plan is fully funded at December 31, 2012.

Deferred Compensation Plan

We have a non-qualified elective deferred compensation plan for certain members of our management team that permits participants to defer up to 100% of their compensation on a pre-tax basis and receive a tax-deferred return on such deferrals. The balance of the plan, which was fully funded, totaled $6.8 million at December 31, 2012 and $7.6 million at December 31, 2011, and is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.


F-38


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

14.    Operating Leases

We lease our properties to tenants under operating leases with various expiration dates extending to the year 2025. Gross minimum future rentals on noncancelable leases in our properties at December 31, 2012 were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,
 
 
2013
 
$
352,149

2014
 
310,422

2015
 
261,123

2016
 
208,483

2017
 
168,585

Thereafter
 
373,283

 
 
$
1,674,045



F-39


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

15.    Information by Business Segment
 
We have ten reportable operating office property segments (comprised of: the Baltimore/Washington Corridor; Northern Virginia; San Antonio; Washington, DC — Capitol Riverfront; St. Mary’s and King George Counties; Greater Baltimore; Suburban Maryland; Colorado Springs; Greater Philadelphia; and other). We also have an operating wholesale data center segment.  On January 1, 2012, we revised our reportable segments to include only operating properties.  Accordingly, we revised net operating income from real estate operations (“NOI from real estate operations”) to exclude operating expenses not related to operating properties, revised our definition of segment assets to include only long-lived assets associated with operating properties and revised our definition of additions to long-lived assets to include only additions to existing operating properties (excluding acquisitions and transfers from non-operating properties).  In 2012, we also reclassified costs expensed in connection with marketing space for lease to prospective tenants from property operating expenses to general, administrative and leasing expenses, the result of which is the exclusion of such expenses from NOI from real estate operations. Financial information for prior periods has been presented in conformity with these revisions.
 
The table below reports segment financial information for our reportable segments (in thousands).  We measure the performance of our segments through the measure we define as NOI from real estate operations, which is derived by subtracting property operating expenses from revenues from real estate operations.
 
Operating Office Property Segments
 
 
 
 
 
Baltimore/
Washington
Corridor
 
Northern
Virginia
 
San
Antonio
 
Washington,
DC - Capitol
Riverfront
 
St. Mary’s & 
King George
Counties
 
Greater
Baltimore
 
Suburban
Maryland
 
Colorado
Springs
 
Greater
Philadelphia
 
Other
 
Operating
Wholesale
Data Center
 
Total
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Revenues from real estate operations
$
224,959

 
$
79,574

 
$
32,018

 
$
16,697

 
$
16,392

 
$
52,616

 
$
15,016

 
$
25,189

 
$
9,698

 
$
14,294

 
$
6,647

 
$
493,100

Property operating expenses
77,295

 
29,103

 
16,499

 
7,555

 
4,745

 
19,917

 
6,295

 
9,283

 
2,562

 
2,666

 
4,815

 
180,735

NOI from real estate operations
$
147,664

 
$
50,471

 
$
15,519

 
$
9,142

 
$
11,647

 
$
32,699

 
$
8,721

 
$
15,906

 
$
7,136

 
$
11,628

 
$
1,832

 
$
312,365

Additions to long-lived assets
$
24,599

 
$
65,157

 
$
280

 
$
317

 
$
1,844

 
$
9,690

 
$
1,319

 
$
2,977

 
$
286

 
$
133

 
$
199

 
$
106,801

Transfers from non-operating properties
$
64,318

 
$
44,250

 
$
468

 
$
—

 
$
289

 
$
37,558

 
$
790

 
$
4,295

 
$
10,626

 
$
394

 
$
58,009

 
$
220,997

Segment assets at December 31, 2012
$
1,214,105

 
$
569,860

 
$
119,369

 
$
104,544

 
$
98,027

 
$
320,548

 
$
53,252

 
$
176,726

 
$
78,798

 
$
109,924

 
$
100,777

 
$
2,945,930

Year Ended December 31, 2011
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Revenues from real estate operations
$
218,051

 
$
74,214

 
$
30,066

 
$
17,878

 
$
14,366

 
$
70,668

 
$
21,982

 
$
23,860

 
$
7,458

 
$
12,235

 
$
5,054

 
$
495,832

Property operating expenses
78,631

 
28,518

 
14,371

 
6,762

 
4,142

 
29,543

 
9,174

 
8,800

 
1,402

 
3,048

 
3,429

 
187,820

NOI from real estate operations
$
139,420

 
$
45,696

 
$
15,695

 
$
11,116

 
$
10,224

 
$
41,125

 
$
12,808

 
$
15,060

 
$
6,056

 
$
9,187

 
$
1,625

 
$
308,012

Additions to long-lived assets
$
20,974

 
$
14,770

 
$
—

 
$
2,794

 
$
1,638

 
$
21,086

 
$
12,267

 
$
4,116

 
$
516

 
$
26,889

 
$
59

 
$
105,109

Transfers from non-operating properties
$
67,357

 
$
4

 
$
17,638

 
$
—

 
$
16,858

 
$
16,307

 
$
395

 
$
214

 
$
5,446

 
$
—

 
$
20,169

 
$
144,388

Segment assets at December 31, 2011
$
1,216,770

 
$
484,392

 
$
131,412

 
$
111,318

 
$
100,818

 
$
402,067

 
$
148,635

 
$
182,758

 
$
102,572

 
$
115,048

 
$
43,650

 
$
3,039,440

Year Ended December 31, 2010
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Revenues from real estate operations
$
207,456

 
$
75,063

 
$
21,673

 
$
4,678

 
$
13,967

 
$
71,850

 
$
21,759

 
$
24,897

 
$
6,299

 
$
13,024

 
$
1,062

 
$
461,728

Property operating expenses
74,365

 
26,688

 
10,260

 
1,736

 
4,176

 
30,406

 
9,455

 
8,231

 
2,131

 
4,105

 
1,216

 
172,769

NOI from real estate operations
$
133,091

 
$
48,375

 
$
11,413

 
$
2,942

 
$
9,791

 
$
41,444

 
$
12,304

 
$
16,666

 
$
4,168

 
$
8,919

 
$
(154
)
 
$
288,959

Additions to long-lived assets
$
21,629

 
$
91,919

 
$
17

 
$
92,827

 
$
1,103

 
$
11,501

 
$
1,959

 
$
1,626

 
$
30

 
$
(2,012
)
 
$
369

 
$
220,968

Transfers from non-operating properties
$
48,549

 
$
(42
)
 
$
40,500

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
15,289

 
$
5,623

 
$
32,438

 
$
23,119

 
$
14

 
$
19,798

 
$
185,288

Segment assets at December 31, 2010
$
1,182,659

 
$
492,005

 
$
114,850

 
$
119,927

 
$
88,221

 
$
473,977

 
$
145,646

 
$
215,801

 
$
99,701

 
$
85,633

 
$
24,227

 
$
3,042,647


F-40


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table reconciles our segment revenues to total revenues as reported on our consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Segment revenues from real estate operations
 
$
493,100

 
$
495,832

 
$
461,728

Construction contract and other service revenues
 
73,836

 
84,345

 
104,675

Less: Revenues from discontinued operations (Note 17)
 
(38,929
)
 
(67,336
)
 
(74,169
)
Total revenues
 
$
528,007

 
$
512,841

 
$
492,234

 
The following table reconciles our segment property operating expenses to property operating expenses as reported on our consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Segment property operating expenses
 
$
180,735

 
$
187,820

 
$
172,769

Less: Property operating expenses from discontinued operations (Note 17)
 
(13,574
)
 
(25,423
)
 
(26,152
)
Total property operating expenses
 
$
167,161

 
$
162,397

 
$
146,617

 
As previously discussed, we provide real estate services such as property management and construction and development services primarily for our properties but also for third parties.  The primary manner in which we evaluate the operating performance of our service activities is through a measure we define as net operating income from service operations (“NOI from service operations”), which is based on the net of revenues and expenses from these activities.  Construction contract and other service revenues and expenses consist primarily of subcontracted costs that are reimbursed to us by the customer along with a management fee. The operating margins from these activities are small relative to the revenue.  We believe NOI from service operations is a useful measure in assessing both our level of activity and our profitability in conducting such operations. The table below sets forth the computation of our NOI from service operations (in thousands):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Construction contract and other service revenues
 
$
73,836

 
$
84,345

 
$
104,675

Construction contract and other service expenses
 
(70,576
)
 
(81,639
)
 
(102,302
)
NOI from service operations
 
$
3,260

 
$
2,706

 
$
2,373


The following table reconciles our NOI from real estate operations for reportable segments and NOI from service operations to (loss) income from continuing operations as reported on our consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
NOI from real estate operations
 
$
312,365

 
$
308,012

 
$
288,959

NOI from service operations
 
3,260

 
2,706

 
2,373

Interest and other income
 
7,172

 
5,603

 
9,568

Equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated entities
 
(546
)
 
(331
)
 
1,376

Income tax (expense) benefit
 
(381
)
 
6,710

 
(108
)
Other adjustments:
 
—

 
 

 
 
Depreciation and other amortization associated with real estate operations
 
(113,480
)
 
(113,111
)
 
(97,897
)
Impairment losses
 
(43,214
)
 
(83,478
)
 
—

General, administrative and leasing expenses
 
(31,900
)
 
(30,314
)
 
(28,501
)
Business development expenses and land carry costs
 
(5,711
)
 
(6,122
)
 
(6,403
)
Interest expense on continuing operations
 
(94,624
)
 
(98,222
)
 
(95,729
)
NOI from discontinued operations
 
(25,355
)
 
(41,913
)
 
(48,017
)
Loss on interest rate derivatives
 
—

 
(29,805
)
 
—

Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 
(943
)
 
(1,639
)
 
—

Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
$
6,643

 
$
(81,904
)
 
$
25,621


F-41


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table reconciles our segment assets to total assets (in thousands):
 
 
As of December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Segment assets
$
2,945,930

 
$
3,039,440

Non-operating property assets
570,402

 
658,900

Other assets
137,427

 
165,215

Total assets
$
3,653,759

 
$
3,863,555

 
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those used to prepare our consolidated financial statements, except that discontinued operations are not presented separately for segment purposes.  In the segment reporting presented above, we did not allocate interest expense, depreciation and amortization and impairment losses to our real estate segments since they are not included in the measure of segment profit reviewed by management.  We also did not allocate general and administrative expenses, business development expenses and land carry costs, interest and other income, equity in loss of unconsolidated entities, income taxes and noncontrolling interests because these items represent general corporate or non-operating property items not attributable to segments.

16.    Income Taxes
 
We elected to be treated as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our adjusted taxable income to our shareholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to Federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, we will be subject to Federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent tax years.

The differences between taxable income reported on our income tax return (estimated 2012 and actual 2011 and 2010) and net income as reported on our consolidated statements of operations are set forth below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
 
 (Estimated)
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
20,341

 
$
(127,576
)
 
$
45,504

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental revenue recognition
 
(12,575
)
 
(10,708
)
 
(9,192
)
Compensation expense recognition
 
(2,098
)
 
(1,298
)
 
(4,820
)
Operating expense recognition
 
1,148

 
751

 
280

Gain on sales of properties
 
(45,323
)
 
1,154

 
6,548

Impairment losses
 
66,910

 
151,021

 
—

Loss on interest rate derivatives
 
(29,805
)
 
29,805

 
—

Gains from non-real estate investments
 
2,843

 
4,447

 
(6,994
)
Income from service operations
 
1,500

 
(12,078
)
 
(1,628
)
Income tax expense
 
381

 
6,710

 
119

Depreciation and amortization
 
25,410

 
44,070

 
42,365

Discounts/premiums included in interest expense
 
3,194

 
5,548

 
5,841

Income from unconsolidated entities
 
(725
)
 
(374
)
 
(244
)
Noncontrolling interests, gross
 
(463
)
 
(7,502
)
 
(3,288
)
Other
 
836

 
80

 
2,173

Taxable income
 
$
31,574

 
$
84,050

 
$
76,664



F-42


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

For Federal income tax purposes, dividends to shareholders may be characterized as ordinary income, capital gains or return of capital. The characterization of dividends declared on our common and preferred shares during each of the last three years was as follows:
 
 
Common Shares
 
Preferred Shares
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Ordinary income
 
33.2
%
 
56.9
%
 
59.7
%
 
100.0
%
 
85.9
%
 
88.3
%
Long term capital gain
 
0.0
%
 
9.4
%
 
8.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
14.1
%
 
11.7
%
Return of capital
 
66.8
%
 
33.7
%
 
32.3
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%

We distributed all of our REIT taxable income in 2012, 2011 and 2010 and, as a result, did not incur Federal income tax in those years on such income.

The net basis of our consolidated assets and liabilities for tax reporting purposes is approximately $387 million lower than the amount reported on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012, which is primarily related to differences in basis for net properties, intangible assets on property acquisitions and deferred rent receivable.

We own a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) that is subject to Federal and state income taxes. Our TRS had income (loss) before income taxes under GAAP of $11.3 million in 2012, $(27.7) million in 2011 and $345,000 in 2010. Our TRS’ provision for income tax consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Deferred
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
$
(312
)
 
$
5,510

 
$
64

State
 
(69
)
 
1,219

 
14

 
 
(381
)
 
6,729

 
78

Current
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
—

 
(16
)
 
(161
)
State
 
—

 
(3
)
 
(36
)
 
 
—

 
(19
)
 
(197
)
Total income tax (expense) benefit
 
$
(381
)
 
$
6,710

 
$
(119
)
Reported on line entitled income tax (expense) benefit
 
$
(381
)
 
$
6,710

 
$
(108
)
Reported on line entitled gain on sales of real estate, net
 
—

 
—

 
(11
)
Total income tax (expense) benefit
 
$
(381
)
 
$
6,710

 
$
(119
)

A reconciliation of our TRS’ Federal statutory rate to the effective tax rate for income tax reported on our statements of operations is set forth below:
 
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Income taxes at U.S. statutory rate
 
34.0
%
 
34.0
%
 
34.0
 %
State and local, net of U.S. Federal tax benefit
 
4.6
%
 
4.6
%
 
4.2
 %
Other
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
 
(3.5
)%
Effective tax rate
 
38.6
%
 
38.6
%
 
34.7
 %

Items in our TRS contributing to temporary differences that lead to deferred taxes include depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, certain accrued compensation, compensation paid in the form of contributions to a deferred nonqualified compensation plan, impairment losses and net operating losses that are not deductible until future periods. As of December 31, 2012, our TRS had a net operating loss carryforward for federal income tax purposes of approximately $16 million expiring in 2033.

The table below sets forth the tax effects of temporary differences and carry forwards included in the net deferred tax asset of our TRS (in thousands):

F-43


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 
 
December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
Operating loss and interest deduction carry forwards
 
$
6,014

 
$
1,758

Share-based compensation
 
598

 
497

Property (1)
 
—

 
4,668

Net deferred tax asset
 
$
6,612

 
$
6,923


(1)
Difference primarily pertains to depreciation and amortization, basis of contributed assets and the capitalization of interest and certain other costs.

 We are subject to certain state and local income and franchise taxes. The expense associated with these state and local taxes is included in general and administrative expense and property operating expenses on our consolidated statements of operations. We did not separately state these amounts on our consolidated statements of operations because they are insignificant.

17.    Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
 
Income from discontinued operations primarily includes revenues and expenses associated with the following:

•
11101 McCormick Road in Greater Baltimore that was sold on February 1, 2010;
•
431 and 437 Ridge Road in Central New Jersey (included in the Other region) that were sold on September 8, 2010;
•
1344 and 1348 Ashton Road and 1350 Dorsey Road in the Baltimore/Washington Corridor that were sold on May 24, 2011;
•
216 Schilling Circle in Greater Baltimore that was sold on August 23, 2011;
•
four properties comprising the Towson Portfolio in Greater Baltimore that were sold on September 29, 2011;
•
11011 McCormick Road in Greater Baltimore that was sold on November 1, 2011;
•
10001 Franklin Square Drive in Greater Baltimore that was sold on December 13, 2011;
•
13 properties comprising the Rutherford Business Center portfolio in Greater Baltimore that were sold on December 15, 2011;
•
five properties in White Marsh, Maryland (in the Greater Baltimore region) that were sold on January 30, 2012;
•
1101 Sentry Gateway in San Antonio that was sold on January 31, 2012;
•
222 and 224 Schilling Circle in Greater Baltimore that were sold on February 10, 2012;
•
15 and 45 West Gude Drive in Suburban Maryland that were sold on May 2, 2012;
•
11800 Tech Road in Suburban Maryland that was sold on June 14, 2012;
•
400 Professional Drive in Suburban Maryland for which the title to the property was transferred to the mortgage lender on July 2, 2012 (see Note 5);
•
23 operating properties in the Baltimore/Washington Corridor and Greater Baltimore regions that were sold on July 24, 2012; and
•
16 operating properties in Colorado Springs and an operating property in Suburban Maryland classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012.


F-44


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The table below sets forth the components of discontinued operations reported on our consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Revenue from real estate operations
 
$
38,929

 
$
67,336

 
$
74,169

Property operating expenses
 
(13,574
)
 
(25,423
)
 
(26,152
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
(8,457
)
 
(21,020
)
 
(25,346
)
Impairment losses
 
(23,696
)
 
(67,543
)
 
—

General, administrative and leasing expenses
 
(3
)
 
(12
)
 
(223
)
Business development and land carry costs
 
(24
)
 
(75
)
 
(72
)
Interest expense
 
(2,174
)
 
(6,079
)
 
(6,399
)
Gain on sales of real estate
 
20,940

 
4,796

 
1,077

Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt
 
1,736

 
(384
)
 
—

Discontinued operations
 
$
13,677

 
$
(48,404
)
 
$
17,054

 
The table below sets forth the components of assets held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
 
 
As of December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Properties, net
$
128,740

 
$
108,356

Deferred rent receivable
4,068

 
2,800

Intangible assets on real estate acquisitions, net
4,409

 
1,737

Deferred leasing costs, net
2,923

 
3,723

Lease incentives
89

 
—

Assets held for sale, net
$
140,229

 
$
116,616


18.    Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)
 
We present both basic and diluted EPS.  We compute basic EPS by dividing net income available to common shareholders allocable to unrestricted common shares under the two-class method by the weighted average number of unrestricted common shares outstanding during the period.  Our computation of diluted EPS is similar except that:
 
•
the denominator is increased to include: (1) the weighted average number of potential additional common shares that would have been outstanding if securities that are convertible into our common shares were converted; and (2) the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period attributable to share-based compensation using the treasury stock or if-converted methods; and
•
the numerator is adjusted to add back any changes in income or loss that would result from the assumed conversion into common shares that we added to the denominator.

F-45


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Summaries of the numerator and denominator for purposes of basic and diluted EPS calculations are set forth below (in thousands, except per share data):
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
$
6,643

 
$
(81,904
)
 
$
25,621

Gain on sales of real estate, net
 
21

 
2,732

 
2,829

Preferred share dividends
 
(20,844
)
 
(16,102
)
 
(16,102
)
Issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares
 
(1,827
)
 
—

 
—

Loss (income) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
1,387

 
5,288

 
(1,421
)
Income from continuing operations attributable to restricted shares
 
(469
)
 
(1,037
)
 
(1,071
)
Numerator for basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
$
(15,089
)
 
$
(91,023
)
 
$
9,856

Numerator for basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
$
(15,089
)
 
$
(91,023
)
 
$
9,856

Discontinued operations
 
13,677

 
(48,404
)
 
17,054

Discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
(751
)
 
2,860

 
(1,323
)
Numerator for basic and diluted EPS on net (loss) income attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
$
(2,163
)
 
$
(136,567
)
 
$
25,587

Denominator (all weighted averages):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Denominator for basic EPS (common shares)
 
73,454

 
69,382

 
59,611

Dilutive effect of share-based compensation awards
 
—

 
—

 
333

Denominator for diluted EPS
 
73,454

 
69,382

 
59,944

Basic EPS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(1.31
)
 
$
0.17

Discontinued operations attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
0.18

 
(0.66
)
 
0.26

Net (loss) income attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(1.97
)
 
$
0.43

Diluted EPS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(1.31
)
 
$
0.17

Discontinued operations attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
0.18

 
(0.66
)
 
0.26

Net (loss) income attributable to COPT common shareholders
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(1.97
)
 
$
0.43

 
Our diluted EPS computations do not include the effects of the following securities since the conversions of such securities would increase diluted EPS for the respective periods (in thousands):
 
 
Weighted Average Shares Excluded from Denominator for the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Conversion of common units
 
4,235

 
4,355

 
4,608

Conversion of convertible preferred units
 
176

 
176

 
176

Conversion of convertible preferred shares
 
434

 
434

 
434

 
The following share-based compensation securities were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because their effect was antidilutive:
 
•
weighted average restricted shares of 461,000 for 2012, 638,000 for 2011 and 666,000 for 2010; and
•
weighted average options of 772,000 for 2012, 712,000 for 2011 and 653,000 for 2010, respectively.
 

F-46


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

As discussed in Note 10, we have outstanding senior notes that have an exchange settlement feature but did not affect our diluted EPS reported above since the weighted average closing price of our common shares during each of the periods was less than the exchange prices per common share applicable for such periods.


19.    Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
The tables below set forth selected quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except per share data). Certain of the amounts below have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation of our consolidated financial statements.
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
First Quarter
 
Second Quarter
 
Third Quarter
 
Fourth Quarter
Revenues
$
132,195

 
$
128,163

 
$
130,144

 
$
137,505

Operating income (loss)
$
36,192

 
$
33,837

 
$
(8,586
)
 
$
34,522

Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
12,685

 
$
10,065

 
$
(31,850
)
 
$
15,743

Discontinued operations
$
(2,450
)
 
$
1,775

 
$
11,085

 
$
3,267

Net income (loss)
$
10,235

 
$
11,861

 
$
(20,765
)
 
$
19,010

Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
60

 
(556
)
 
1,603

 
(471
)
Net income (loss) attributable to COPT
10,295

 
11,305

 
(19,162
)
 
18,539

Preferred share dividends
(4,025
)
 
(4,167
)
 
(6,546
)
 
(6,106
)
Issuance costs associated with redeemed preferred shares
—

 
—

 
(1,827
)
 
—

Net income (loss) attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
6,270

 
$
7,138

 
$
(27,535
)
 
$
12,433

Basic earnings per common share
$
0.09

 
$
0.10

 
$
(0.39
)
 
$
0.16

Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.09

 
$
0.10

 
$
(0.39
)
 
$
0.16

 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
First Quarter
 
Second Quarter
 
Third Quarter
 
Fourth Quarter
Revenues
$
126,320

 
$
131,840

 
$
126,707

 
$
127,974

Operating income (loss)
$
787

 
$
16,600

 
$
27,400

 
$
(9,007
)
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(22,851
)
 
$
(397
)
 
$
1,669

 
$
(60,325
)
Discontinued operations
$
1,584

 
$
(25,008
)
 
$
5,801

 
$
(30,781
)
Net (loss) income
$
(18,566
)
 
$
(25,378
)
 
$
7,470

 
$
(91,102
)
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
1,204

 
1,964

 
(626
)
 
5,606

Net (loss) income attributable to COPT
(17,362
)
 
(23,414
)
 
6,844

 
(85,496
)
Preferred share dividends
(4,025
)
 
(4,026
)
 
(4,025
)
 
(4,026
)
Net (loss) income attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
(21,387
)
 
$
(27,440
)
 
$
2,819

 
$
(89,522
)
Basic earnings per common share
$
(0.33
)
 
$
(0.40
)
 
$
0.04

 
$
(1.26
)
Diluted earnings per common share
$
(0.33
)
 
$
(0.41
)
 
$
0.04

 
$
(1.26
)


F-47


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The amounts reported above were revised for the error corrections described in Note 2. The tables below set forth the revisions to the selected quarterly information (the “Previously Reported” columns include the effects of other reclassifications and retrospective changes in presentation discussed in Note 2)(in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
Previously Reported
 
As Revised
 
Previously Reported
 
As Revised
 
Previously Reported
 
As Revised
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
9,427

 
$
12,685

 
$
10,065

 
$
10,065

 
$
(31,850
)
 
$
(31,850
)
Net income (loss)
$
6,977

 
$
10,235

 
$
11,861

 
$
11,861

 
$
(20,765
)
 
$
(20,765
)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(300
)
 
60

 
(1,107
)
 
(556
)
 
993

 
1,603

Net income (loss) attributable to COPT
$
6,677

 
$
10,295

 
$
10,754

 
$
11,305

 
$
(19,772
)
 
$
(19,162
)
Net income (loss) attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
2,652

 
$
6,270

 
$
6,587

 
$
7,138

 
$
(28,145
)
 
$
(27,535
)
Basic and diluted earnings per common share
$
0.04

 
$
0.09

 
$
0.09

 
$
0.10

 
$
(0.39
)
 
$
(0.39
)

 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2011
 
6/30/2011
 
9/30/2011
 
12/31/2011
 
Previously Reported
 
As Revised
 
Previously Reported
 
As Revised
 
Previously Reported
 
As Revised
 
Previously Reported
 
As Revised
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(22,851
)
 
$
(22,851
)
 
$
(1,026
)
 
$
(397
)
 
$
1,669

 
$
1,669

 
$
(56,438
)
 
$
(60,325
)
Net (loss) income
$
(18,566
)
 
$
(18,566
)
 
$
(26,007
)
 
$
(25,378
)
 
$
7,470

 
$
7,470

 
$
(87,215
)
 
$
(91,102
)
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
776

 
1,204

 
1,783

 
1,964

 
(904
)
 
(626
)
 
4,988

 
5,606

Net (loss) income attributable to COPT
$
(17,790
)
 
$
(17,362
)
 
$
(24,224
)
 
$
(23,414
)
 
$
6,566

 
$
6,844

 
$
(82,227
)
 
$
(85,496
)
Net (loss) income attributable to COPT common shareholders
$
(21,815
)
 
$
(21,387
)
 
$
(28,250
)
 
$
(27,440
)
 
$
2,541

 
$
2,819

 
$
(86,253
)
 
$
(89,522
)
Basic earnings per common share
$
(0.33
)
 
$
(0.33
)
 
$
(0.42
)
 
$
(0.40
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
0.04

 
$
(1.21
)
 
$
(1.26
)
Diluted earnings per common share
$
(0.33
)
 
$
(0.33
)
 
$
(0.42
)
 
$
(0.41
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
0.04

 
$
(1.21
)
 
$
(1.26
)

20.    Commitments and Contingencies
 
Litigation
 
In the normal course of business, we are involved in legal actions arising from our ownership and administration of properties.  We establish reserves for specific legal proceedings when we determine that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.  Management does not anticipate that any liabilities that may result from such proceedings will have a materially adverse effect on our financial position, operations or liquidity.  Our assessment of the potential outcomes of these matters involves significant judgment and is subject to change based on future developments.
 
Environmental
 
We are subject to various Federal, state and local environmental regulations related to our property ownership and operation.  We have performed environmental assessments of our properties, the results of which have not revealed any environmental liability that we believe would have a materially adverse effect on our financial position, operations or liquidity.
 
Joint Ventures

In connection with our 2005 contribution of properties to an unconsolidated partnership in which we hold a partnership interest, we entered into standard nonrecourse loan guarantees (environmental indemnifications and guarantees against fraud and misrepresentation, and springing guarantees of partnership debt in the event of a voluntary bankruptcy of the partnership).  The maximum amount we could be required to pay under the guarantees is approximately $64 million.  We are entitled to recover 80% of any amounts paid under the guarantees from an affiliate of our partner pursuant to an indemnity agreement.  In 2012, the holder of the mortgage debt encumbering all of the joint venture’s properties initiated foreclosure proceedings.

F-48


Corporate Office Properties Trust and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Management considered this event and estimates that the aggregate fair value of the guarantees would not exceed the amounts included in distributions received in excess of investment in unconsolidated real estate joint venture reported on the consolidated balance sheets.
 
We are party to a contribution agreement that formed a joint venture relationship with a limited partnership to develop up to 1.3 million square feet of office space on 92 acres of land located in Hanover, Maryland.  As we and the joint venture partner agree to proceed with the construction of buildings in the future, our joint venture partner would contribute land into newly-formed entities and we would make cash capital contributions into such entities to fund development and construction activities for which financing is not obtained.  We owned a 50% interest in one such joint venture as of December 31, 2012.
 
We may be required to make our pro rata share of additional investments in our real estate joint ventures (generally based on our percentage ownership) in the event that additional funds are needed.  In the event that the other members of these joint ventures do not pay their share of investments when additional funds are needed, we may then deem it appropriate to make even larger investments in these joint ventures.

Tax Incremental Financing Obligation
 
In August 2010, Anne Arundel County, Maryland issued $30 million in tax incremental financing bonds to third-party investors in order to finance public improvements needed in connection with our project known as National Business Park North.  The real estate taxes on increases in assessed value of a development district encompassing National Business Park North are to be transferred to a special fund pledged to the repayment of the bonds.  We recognized a $3.6 million liability through December 31, 2012 representing the estimated fair value of our obligation to fund through a special tax any future shortfalls between debt service on the bonds and real estate taxes available to repay the bonds.
 
Ground Leases

We are obligated as lessee under ground leases with various lease expiration dates extending to the year 2100. Future minimum rental payments due under the terms of these leases as of December 31, 2012 follow (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,
 
 
2013
 
$
919

2014
 
973

2015
 
974

2016
 
974

2017
 
974

Thereafter
 
81,700

 
 
$
86,514


Environmental Indemnity Agreement
 
We agreed to provide certain environmental indemnifications in connection with a lease and subsequent sale of three New Jersey properties. The prior owner of the properties, a Fortune 100 company that is responsible for groundwater contamination at such properties, previously agreed to indemnify us for (1) direct losses incurred in connection with the contamination and (2) its failure to perform remediation activities required by the State of New Jersey, up to the point that the state declares the remediation to be complete.  Under the environmental indemnification agreement, we agreed to the following:
 
•
to indemnify the tenant against losses covered under the prior owner’s indemnity agreement if the prior owner fails to indemnify the tenant for such losses.  This indemnification is capped at $5.0 million in perpetuity after the State of New Jersey declares the remediation to be complete;
•
to indemnify the tenant for consequential damages (e.g., business interruption) at one of the buildings in perpetuity and another of the buildings through 2025.  This indemnification is limited to $12.5 million; and
•
to pay 50% of additional costs related to construction and environmental regulatory activities incurred by the tenant as a result of the indemnified environmental condition of the properties.  This indemnification is limited to $300,000 annually and $1.5 million in the aggregate.

F-49


Corporate Office Properties Trust
Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
Initial Cost
 
Gross Amounts Carried At Close of Period
 
 
 
Property (Type) (1)
Location
Encumbrances (2)
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Total (3)(4)
Accumulated Depreciation (5)
Year Built or Renovated
Date Acquired (6)
1000 Redstone Gateway (O)
Huntsville, AL
$
11,078

$
—

$
18,582

$
—

$
—

$
18,582

$
18,582

$
—

(7)
3/23/2010
1055 North Newport Road (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

972

5,708

—

972

5,708

6,680

(178
)
2007-2008
5/19/2006
10807 New Allegiance Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

1,840

15,439

122

1,840

15,561

17,401

(298
)
2009
9/28/2005
1099 Winterson Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
12,012

1,323

5,293

2,499

1,323

7,792

9,115

(3,348
)
1988
4/30/1998
1100 Redstone Gateway (O)
Huntsville, AL
—

—

924

—

—

924

924

—

(7)
3/23/2010
114 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

364

3,109

21

364

3,130

3,494

(878
)
2002
6/30/2000
11751 Meadowville Lane (O)
Richmond, VA
—

1,305

52,098

112

1,305

52,210

53,515

(7,278
)
2007
9/15/2006
1190 Winterson Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
11,291

1,335

5,340

4,025

1,335

9,365

10,700

(5,111
)
1987
4/30/1998
1199 Winterson Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
18,578

1,599

6,395

3,266

1,599

9,661

11,260

(4,665
)
1988
4/30/1998
1200 Redstone Gateway (O)
Huntsville, AL
—

—

2,297

—

—

2,297

2,297

—

(7)
3/23/2010
1201 M Street (O)
Washington, DC
36,659

—

49,785

1,959

—

51,744

51,744

(3,939
)
2001
9/28/2010
1201 Winterson Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,288

5,154

460

1,288

5,614

6,902

(2,068
)
1985
4/30/1998
1220 12th Street, SE (O)
Washington, DC
30,153

—

42,464

733

—

43,197

43,197

(3,914
)
2003
9/28/2010
1243 Winterson Road (L)
Linthicum, MD
—

630

—

—

630

—

630

—

(8)
12/19/2001
12515 Academy Ridge View (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

2,612

6,087

—

2,612

6,087

8,699

(441
)
2006
6/26/2009
1302 Concourse Drive (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

2,078

8,313

2,991

2,078

11,304

13,382

(4,626
)
1996
11/18/1999
1304 Concourse Drive (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,999

12,934

1,202

1,999

14,136

16,135

(4,657
)
2002
11/18/1999
1306 Concourse Drive (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

2,796

11,186

2,837

2,796

14,023

16,819

(4,998
)
1990
11/18/1999
131 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
6,922

1,906

7,623

2,657

1,906

10,280

12,186

(3,876
)
1990
9/28/1998
132 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

2,917

12,259

2,895

2,917

15,154

18,071

(6,563
)
2000
5/28/1999
13200 Woodland Park Road (O)
Herndon, VA
—

10,428

41,711

13,831

10,428

55,542

65,970

(19,432
)
2002
6/2/2003
133 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
9,262

2,517

10,068

4,821

2,517

14,889

17,406

(6,167
)
1997
9/28/1998
1331 Ashton Road (O)
Hanover, MD
—

587

2,347

677

587

3,024

3,611

(939
)
1989
4/28/1999
1334 Ashton Road (O)
Hanover, MD
—

736

1,488

2,301

736

3,789

4,525

(1,468
)
1989
4/28/1999
134 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
19,200

3,684

7,517

2,230

3,684

9,747

13,431

(4,138
)
1999
11/13/1998
1340 Ashton Road (O)
Hanover, MD
—

905

3,620

1,067

905

4,687

5,592

(1,874
)
1989
4/28/1999
1341 Ashton Road (O)
Hanover, MD
—

306

1,223

588

306

1,811

2,117

(727
)
1989
4/28/1999
1343 Ashton Road (O)
Hanover, MD
—

193

774

405

193

1,179

1,372

(435
)
1989
4/28/1999
13450 Sunrise Valley Road (O)
Herndon, VA
—

1,386

5,576

2,722

1,386

8,298

9,684

(2,853
)
1998
7/25/2003
13454 Sunrise Valley Road (O)
Herndon, VA
—

2,899

11,986

3,909

2,899

15,895

18,794

(4,605
)
1998
7/25/2003
135 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
9,925

2,484

9,750

2,882

2,484

12,632

15,116

(4,932
)
1998
12/30/1998
1362 Mellon Road (O)
Hanover, MD
—

1,706

8,412

18

1,706

8,430

10,136

(841
)
2006
2/10/2006
13857 McLearen Road (O)
Herndon, VA
—

3,507

30,177

1,724

3,507

31,901

35,408

(973
)
2007
7/11/2012
140 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

3,407

24,167

643

3,407

24,810

28,217

(5,748
)
2003
12/31/2003

F-50


 
 
 
Initial Cost
 
Gross Amounts Carried At Close of Period
 
 
 
Property (Type) (1)
Location
Encumbrances (2)
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Total (3)(4)
Accumulated Depreciation (5)
Year Built or Renovated
Date Acquired (6)
141 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
9,725

2,398

9,590

2,389

2,398

11,979

14,377

(4,354
)
1990
9/28/1998
14280 Park Meadow Drive (O)
Chantilly, VA
—

3,731

15,953

1,009

3,731

16,962

20,693

(4,529
)
1999
9/29/2004
1460 Dorsey Road (L)
Hanover, MD
—

1,800

—

—

1,800

—

1,800

—

(8)
2/28/2006
14840 Conference Center Drive (O)
Chantilly, VA
—

1,572

8,175

508

1,572

8,683

10,255

(3,385
)
2000
7/25/2003
14850 Conference Center Drive (O)
Chantilly, VA
—

1,615

8,358

539

1,615

8,897

10,512

(3,434
)
2000
7/25/2003
14900 Conference Center Drive (O)
Chantilly, VA
—

3,436

14,402

3,560

3,436

17,962

21,398

(5,796
)
1999
7/25/2003
15000 Conference Center Drive (O)
Chantilly, VA
54,000

5,193

47,045

18,198

5,193

65,243

70,436

(20,752
)
1989
11/30/2001
1501 South Clinton Street (O)
Baltimore, MD
—

27,964

50,415

5,222

27,964

55,637

83,601

(5,696
)
2006
10/27/2009
15010 Conference Center Drive (O)
Chantilly, VA
96,000

3,500

41,921

344

3,500

42,265

45,765

(6,503
)
2006
11/30/2001
15049 Conference Center Drive (O)
Chantilly, VA
—

4,415

20,365

726

4,415

21,091

25,506

(7,276
)
1997
8/14/2002
15059 Conference Center Drive (O)
Chantilly, VA
—

5,753

13,615

1,423

5,753

15,038

20,791

(4,891
)
2000
8/14/2002
1550 West Nursery Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

14,071

16,930

—

14,071

16,930

31,001

(1,862
)
2009
10/28/2009
1550 Westbranch Drive (O)
McLean, VA
—

5,595

26,212

116

5,595

26,328

31,923

(2,354
)
2002
6/28/2010
1560A Cable Ranch Road (O)
San Antonio, TX
—

1,097

3,770

28

1,097

3,798

4,895

(667
)
1985/2007
6/19/2008
1560B Cable Ranch Road (O)
San Antonio, TX
—

2,299

6,545

11

2,299

6,556

8,855

(1,120
)
1985/2006
6/19/2008
16442 Commerce Drive (O)
Dahlgren, VA
2,305

613

2,582

555

613

3,137

3,750

(761
)
2002
12/21/2004
16480 Commerce Drive (O)
Dahlgren, VA
—

1,856

7,425

164

1,856

7,589

9,445

(1,649
)
2000
12/28/2004
16501 Commerce Drive (O)
Dahlgren, VA
1,885

522

2,090

185

522

2,275

2,797

(594
)
2002
12/21/2004
16539 Commerce Drive (O)
Dahlgren, VA
—

688

2,860

1,443

688

4,303

4,991

(1,224
)
1990
12/21/2004
16541 Commerce Drive (O)
Dahlgren, VA
—

773

3,094

1,321

773

4,415

5,188

(1,149
)
1996
12/21/2004
16543 Commerce Drive (O)
Dahlgren, VA
1,571

436

1,742

12

436

1,754

2,190

(349
)
2002
12/21/2004
1670 North Newport Road (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
4,383

853

5,188

763

853

5,951

6,804

(776
)
1986/1987
9/30/2005
1751 Pinnacle Drive (O)
McLean, VA
30,283

10,486

42,339

12,461

10,486

54,800

65,286

(16,190
)
1989/1995
9/23/2004
1753 Pinnacle Drive (O)
McLean, VA
24,438

8,275

34,353

8,736

8,275

43,089

51,364

(10,657
)
1976/2004
9/23/2004
1915 Aerotech Drive (O)
Colorado Springs, CO
3,394

556

3,094

539

556

3,633

4,189

(1,037
)
1985
6/8/2006
1925 Aerotech Drive (O)
Colorado Springs, CO
3,717

556

3,067

343

556

3,410

3,966

(759
)
1985
6/8/2006
201 Technology Drive (O)
Lebanon, VA
—

726

31,091

60

726

31,151

31,877

(4,021
)
2007
10/5/2007
206 Research Boulevard (O)
Aberdeen, MD
—

1,813

17,334

—

1,813

17,334

19,147

(107
)
2012
9/14/2007
209 Research Boulevard (O)
Aberdeen, MD
—

1,045

16,063

—

1,045

16,063

17,108

(859
)
2010
9/14/2007
210 Research Boulevard (O)
Aberdeen, MD
—

1,065

13,144

—

1,065

13,144

14,209

(519
)
2010
9/14/2007
22289 Exploration Drive (O)
Lexington Park, MD
—

1,422

5,719

1,005

1,422

6,724

8,146

(1,951
)
2000
3/24/2004
22299 Exploration Drive (O)
Lexington Park, MD
—

1,362

5,791

682

1,362

6,473

7,835

(2,026
)
1998
3/24/2004
22300 Exploration Drive (O)
Lexington Park, MD
—

1,094

5,038

169

1,094

5,207

6,301

(1,569
)
1997
11/9/2004
22309 Exploration Drive (O)
Lexington Park, MD
—

2,243

10,419

227

2,243

10,646

12,889

(3,459
)
1984/1997
3/24/2004
23535 Cottonwood Parkway (O)
California, MD
—

692

3,051

223

692

3,274

3,966

(789
)
1984
3/24/2004
2500 Riva Road (O)
Annapolis, MD
—

2,791

12,145

1

2,791

12,146

14,937

(3,384
)
2000
3/4/2003
2691 Technology Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
24,000

2,098

17,334

5,096

2,098

22,430

24,528

(5,167
)
2005
5/26/2000
2701 Technology Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
13,794

1,737

15,266

306

1,737

15,572

17,309

(5,403
)
2001
5/26/2000
2711 Technology Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
19,359

2,251

21,611

1,075

2,251

22,686

24,937

(7,961
)
2002
11/13/2000

F-51


 
 
 
Initial Cost
 
Gross Amounts Carried At Close of Period
 
 
 
Property (Type) (1)
Location
Encumbrances (2)
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Total (3)(4)
Accumulated Depreciation (5)
Year Built or Renovated
Date Acquired (6)
2720 Technology Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
24,068

3,863

29,272

88

3,863

29,360

33,223

(6,102
)
2004
1/31/2002
2721 Technology Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

4,611

14,597

1,497

4,611

16,094

20,705

(4,841
)
2000
10/21/1999
2730 Hercules Road (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
32,734

8,737

31,612

5,277

8,737

36,889

45,626

(11,825
)
1990
9/28/1998
2900 Towerview Road (O)
Herndon, VA
—

3,207

16,344

5,607

3,207

21,951

25,158

(3,785
)
1982/2008
12/20/2005
300 Sentinel Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

1,517

58,642

119

1,517

58,761

60,278

(4,026
)
2009
11/14/2003
302 Sentinel Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
22,693

2,648

29,398

380

2,648

29,778

32,426

(3,642
)
2007
11/14/2003
304 Sentinel Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
37,280

3,411

24,917

132

3,411

25,049

28,460

(4,361
)
2005
11/14/2003
306 Sentinel Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
20,973

3,260

22,592

110

3,260

22,702

25,962

(3,541
)
2006
11/14/2003
308 Sentinel Drive (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

1,422

26,197

—

1,422

26,197

27,619

(1,085
)
2010
11/14/2003
310 The Bridge Street (O)
Huntsville, AL
—

261

26,576

26

261

26,602

26,863

(2,028
)
2009
8/4/2011
312 Sentinel Way (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

3,138

9,128

—

3,138

9,128

12,266

—

(7)
11/14/2003
3120 Fairview Park Drive (O)
Falls Church, VA
—

6,863

35,606

5,406

6,863

41,012

47,875

(2,247
)
2008
11/23/2010
314 Sentinel Way (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

1,254

1,325

—

1,254

1,325

2,579

(149
)
2008
11/14/2003
316 Sentinel Way (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

2,748

31,861

131

2,748

31,992

34,740

(830
)
2011
11/14/2003
318 Sentinel Way (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
22,240

2,185

28,426

—

2,185

28,426

30,611

(4,849
)
2005
11/14/2003
320 Sentinel Way (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

2,067

21,623

—

2,067

21,623

23,690

(2,688
)
2007
11/14/2003
322 Sentinel Way (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
21,912

2,605

22,827

—

2,605

22,827

25,432

(3,431
)
2006
11/14/2003
324 Sentinel Way (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

1,656

23,005

—

1,656

23,005

24,661

(1,352
)
2010
6/29/2006
3535 Northrop Grumman Pt. (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
17,982

—

18,388

121

—

18,509

18,509

(1,555
)
2008
6/10/2008
375 West Padonia Road (O)
Timonium, MD
—

2,483

10,415

4,821

2,483

15,236

17,719

(5,242
)
1986
12/21/1999
410 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

1,831

16,569

—

1,831

16,569

18,400

(34
)
2012
6/29/2003
420 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

2,370

15,673

—

2,370

15,673

18,043

—

(7)
6/29/2006
4230 Forbes Boulevard (O)(10)
Lanham, MD
—

511

4,346

192

511

4,538

5,049

(1,837
)
2003
12/24/2002
430 National Business Parkway (O)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

1,852

21,038

—

1,852

21,038

22,890

(449
)
2011
6/29/2006
44408 Pecan Court (O)
California, MD
—

817

1,583

118

817

1,701

2,518

(161
)
1986
3/24/2004
44414 Pecan Court (O)
California, MD
—

405

1,619

336

405

1,955

2,360

(475
)
1986
3/24/2004
44417 Pecan Court (O)
California, MD
—

434

1,939

88

434

2,027

2,461

(636
)
1989
3/24/2004
44420 Pecan Court (O)
California, MD
—

344

890

126

344

1,016

1,360

(90
)
1989
11/9/2004
44425 Pecan Court (O)
California, MD
—

1,309

3,506

1,217

1,309

4,723

6,032

(921
)
1997
5/5/2004
45310 Abell House Lane (O)
California, MD
—

2,272

13,794

—

2,272

13,794

16,066

(368
)
2011
8/30/2010
46579 Expedition Drive (O)
Lexington Park, MD
—

1,406

5,796

1,078

1,406

6,874

8,280

(2,147
)
2002
3/24/2004
46591 Expedition Drive (O)
Lexington Park, MD
—

1,200

7,199

656

1,200

7,855

9,055

(1,083
)
2005
3/24/2004
4851 Stonecroft Boulevard (O)
Chantilly, VA
—

1,878

11,558

21

1,878

11,579

13,457

(2,379
)
2004
8/14/2002
4940 Campbell Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,379

3,858

987

1,379

4,845

6,224

(933
)
1990
1/9/2007
4969 Mercantile Road (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,308

4,456

62

1,308

4,518

5,826

(678
)
1983
1/9/2007
4979 Mercantile Road (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,299

4,686

84

1,299

4,770

6,069

(727
)
1985
1/9/2007
5020 Campbell Boulevard (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,014

3,136

781

1,014

3,917

4,931

(673
)
1986-1988
1/9/2007
5022 Campbell Boulevard (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

624

1,924

332

624

2,256

2,880

(496
)
1986-1988
1/9/2007
5024 Campbell Boulevard (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

767

2,420

250

767

2,670

3,437

(702
)
1986-1988
1/9/2007

F-52


 
 
 
Initial Cost
 
Gross Amounts Carried At Close of Period
 
 
 
Property (Type) (1)
Location
Encumbrances (2)
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Total (3)(4)
Accumulated Depreciation (5)
Year Built or Renovated
Date Acquired (6)
5026 Campbell Boulevard (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

700

2,138

45

700

2,183

2,883

(396
)
1986-1988
1/9/2007
525 Babcock Road (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

355

397

79

355

476

831

(89
)
1967
7/12/2007
5325 Nottingham Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

816

3,976

485

816

4,461

5,277

(763
)
2002
1/9/2007
5355 Nottingham Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

761

3,562

1,616

761

5,178

5,939

(1,380
)
2005
1/9/2007
5520 Research Park Drive (O)
Catonsville, MD
—

—

20,066

—

—

20,066

20,066

(1,679
)
2009
4/4/2006
5522 Research Park Drive (O)
Catonsville, MD
—

—

4,550

—

—

4,550

4,550

(614
)
2007
3/8/2006
565 Space Center Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

644

6,284

352

644

6,636

7,280

(107
)
2009
7/8/2005
5725 Mark Dabling Boulevard (O)
Colorado Springs, CO
12,882

900

11,397

2,832

900

14,229

15,129

(4,567
)
1984
5/18/2006
5755 Mark Dabling Boulevard (O)
Colorado Springs, CO
10,208

799

10,324

3,597

799

13,921

14,720

(3,464
)
1989
5/18/2006
5775 Mark Dabling Boulevard (O)
Colorado Springs, CO
12,477

1,035

12,440

1,658

1,035

14,098

15,133

(4,260
)
1984
5/18/2006
5825 University Research Court (O)
College Park, MD
16,292

—

22,190

11

—

22,201

22,201

(2,118
)
2008
1/29/2008
5850 University Research Court (O)
College Park, MD
22,183

—

30,273

57

—

30,330

30,330

(2,236
)
2008
1/29/2008
655 Space Center Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

745

15,445

59

745

15,504

16,249

—

2008
7/8/2005
6700 Alexander Bell Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
4,000

1,755

7,019

4,628

1,755

11,647

13,402

(4,568
)
1988
5/14/2001
6708 Alexander Bell Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
6,320

897

3,588

1,592

897

5,180

6,077

(2,440
)
1988
5/14/2001
6711 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

2,683

23,239

314

2,683

23,553

26,236

(3,503
)
2006-2007
9/28/2000
6716 Alexander Bell Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,242

4,969

2,525

1,242

7,494

8,736

(3,394
)
1990
12/31/1998
6721 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
29,252

1,753

34,090

—

1,753

34,090

35,843

(3,233
)
2009
9/28/2000
6724 Alexander Bell Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
10,939

449

5,039

579

449

5,618

6,067

(1,787
)
2001
5/14/2001
6731 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

2,807

19,098

1,648

2,807

20,746

23,553

(6,546
)
2002
3/29/2000
6740 Alexander Bell Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,424

5,696

3,045

1,424

8,741

10,165

(3,933
)
1992
12/31/1998
6741 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

675

1,711

114

675

1,825

2,500

(195
)
2008
9/28/2000
6750 Alexander Bell Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,263

12,461

3,351

1,263

15,812

17,075

(5,893
)
2001
12/31/1998
6760 Alexander Bell Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

890

3,561

1,979

890

5,540

6,430

(2,582
)
1991
12/31/1998
6940 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
17,300

3,545

9,916

3,162

3,545

13,078

16,623

(5,274
)
1999
11/13/1998
6950 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

3,596

14,269

1,033

3,596

15,302

18,898

(5,975
)
1998
10/22/1998
7000 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
15,800

3,131

12,103

622

3,131

12,725

15,856

(3,246
)
1999
5/31/2002
7015 Albert Einstein Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
2,486

2,058

6,093

826

2,058

6,919

8,977

(2,179
)
1999
12/1/2005
7061 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

729

3,094

571

729

3,665

4,394

(1,460
)
2000
8/30/2001
7063 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

902

3,684

1,043

902

4,727

5,629

(2,058
)
2000
8/30/2001
7065 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

919

3,763

1,263

919

5,026

5,945

(1,923
)
2000
8/30/2001
7067 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,829

11,823

2,415

1,829

14,238

16,067

(4,340
)
2001
8/30/2001
7125 Columbia Gateway Drive (L)
Columbia, MD
—

3,361

128

279

3,361

407

3,768

—

1973/1999(8)
6/29/2006
7125 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
33,779

17,126

46,994

6,583

17,126

53,577

70,703

(10,556
)
1973/1999
6/29/2006
7130 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
6,519

1,350

4,359

1,784

1,350

6,143

7,493

(1,577
)
1989
9/19/2005
7134 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
2,949

704

1,971

299

704

2,270

2,974

(499
)
1990
9/19/2005
7138 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
5,406

1,104

3,518

1,961

1,104

5,479

6,583

(2,174
)
1990
9/19/2005
7142 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
6,280

1,342

3,978

1,326

1,342

5,304

6,646

(1,406
)
1994
9/19/2005
7150 Columbia Gateway Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
4,850

1,032

3,429

321

1,032

3,750

4,782

(867
)
1991
9/19/2005

F-53


 
 
 
Initial Cost
 
Gross Amounts Carried At Close of Period
 
 
 
Property (Type) (1)
Location
Encumbrances (2)
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Total (3)(4)
Accumulated Depreciation (5)
Year Built or Renovated
Date Acquired (6)
7150 Riverwood Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,821

4,388

972

1,821

5,360

7,181

(1,163
)
2000
1/10/2007
7160 Riverwood Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

2,732

7,006

1,503

2,732

8,509

11,241

(2,688
)
2000
1/10/2007
7170 Riverwood Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,283

3,096

594

1,283

3,690

4,973

(726
)
2000
1/10/2007
7175 Riverwood Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,788

4,133

—

1,788

4,133

5,921

—

1996(7)
7/27/2005
7200 Redstone Gateway (O)
Huntsville, MD
—

—

4,531

—

—

4,531

4,531

—

(7)
3/23/2010
7200 Riverwood Road (O)
Columbia, MD
—

4,089

16,356

3,001

4,089

19,357

23,446

(6,741
)
1986
10/13/1998
7205 Riverwood Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,367

14,300

—

1,367

14,300

15,667

—

(7)
7/27/2005
7272 Park Circle Drive (O)
Hanover, MD
5,232

1,479

6,300

1,798

1,479

8,098

9,577

(1,663
)
1991/1996
1/10/2007
7318 Parkway Drive (O)
Hanover, MD
—

972

3,888

812

972

4,700

5,672

(1,582
)
1984
4/16/1999
7320 Parkway Drive (O)
Hanover, MD
7,000

905

3,570

1,575

905

5,145

6,050

(1,557
)
1983
4/4/2002
745 Space Center Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

654

7,521

15

654

7,536

8,190

(171
)
2006
7/8/2005
7467 Ridge Road (O)
Hanover, MD
—

1,629

6,517

1,924

1,629

8,441

10,070

(3,346
)
1990
4/28/1999
7700 Potranco Road (O)
San Antonio, TX
—

14,020

38,804

7

14,020

38,811

52,831

(5,703
)
1982/1985
3/30/2005
7700-1 Potranco Road (O)
San Antonio, TX
—

—

1,066

—

—

1,066

1,066

(108
)
2007
3/30/2005
7700-5 Potranco Road (O)
San Antonio, TX
—

—

1,884

—

—

1,884

1,884

(154
)
2009
3/30/2005
7740 Milestone Parkway (O)
Hanover, MD
17,548

3,825

34,363

61

3,825

34,424

38,249

(2,265
)
2009
7/2/2007
7770 Backlick Road (O)
Springfield, VA
931

6,387

71,600

8

6,387

71,608

77,995

(157
)
2012(7)
3/10/2010
800 International Drive (O)
Linthicum, MD
8,408

775

3,099

947

775

4,046

4,821

(1,662
)
1988
4/30/1998
8000 Potranco Road (O)
San Antonio, TX
—

1,964

21,178

—

1,964

21,178

23,142

(1,149
)
2010
1/20/2006
8003 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

611

1,611

53

611

1,664

2,275

(311
)
1999
1/9/2007
8007 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,434

3,336

307

1,434

3,643

5,077

(727
)
1995
1/9/2007
8010 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,349

3,262

1,672

1,349

4,934

6,283

(842
)
1998
1/9/2007
8013 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

642

1,536

1,809

642

3,345

3,987

(432
)
1990
1/9/2007
8015 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

446

1,116

243

446

1,359

1,805

(306
)
1990
1/9/2007
8019 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

680

1,898

738

680

2,636

3,316

(555
)
1990
1/9/2007
8020 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

2,184

3,767

2,199

2,184

5,966

8,150

(954
)
1997
1/9/2007
8023 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

651

1,603

5

651

1,608

2,259

(267
)
1990
1/9/2007
8030 Potranco Road (O)
San Antonio, TX
—

1,964

21,298

—

1,964

21,298

23,262

(1,148
)
2010
1/20/2006
8094 Sandpiper Circle (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,960

3,716

369

1,960

4,085

6,045

(820
)
1998
1/9/2007
8098 Sandpiper Circle (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,797

3,651

633

1,797

4,284

6,081

(558
)
1998
1/9/2007
8100 Potranco Road (L)
San Antonio, TX
—

1,964

1,396

—

1,964

1,396

3,360

—

(8)
6/14/2005
8110 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

2,285

10,117

489

2,285

10,606

12,891

(2,202
)
2001
1/9/2007
8140 Corporate Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

2,158

8,457

2,018

2,158

10,475

12,633

(3,046
)
2003
1/9/2007
849 International Drive (O)
Linthicum, MD
11,692

1,356

5,426

3,081

1,356

8,507

9,863

(4,043
)
1988
2/23/1999
8621 Robert Fulton Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
11,000

2,317

12,642

199

2,317

12,841

15,158

(2,314
)
2005-2006
6/10/2005
8661 Robert Fulton Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
6,200

1,510

3,764

1,042

1,510

4,806

6,316

(1,518
)
2002
12/30/2003
8671 Robert Fulton Drive (O)
Columbia, MD
7,600

1,718

4,280

1,941

1,718

6,221

7,939

(2,148
)
2002
12/30/2003
870 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
18,900

2,003

9,442

6,689

2,003

16,131

18,134

(7,148
)
1981
8/3/2001
881 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
11,812

1,034

4,137

1,049

1,034

5,186

6,220

(1,991
)
1986
4/30/1998

F-54


 
 
 
Initial Cost
 
Gross Amounts Carried At Close of Period
 
 
 
Property (Type) (1)
Location
Encumbrances (2)
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Total (3)(4)
Accumulated Depreciation (5)
Year Built or Renovated
Date Acquired (6)
891 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,165

4,772

1,777

1,165

6,549

7,714

(2,674
)
1984
7/2/2001
900 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,993

7,972

2,887

1,993

10,859

12,852

(4,722
)
1982
4/30/1998
900 International Drive (O)
Linthicum, MD
8,008

981

3,922

834

981

4,756

5,737

(1,964
)
1986
4/30/1998
901 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,156

4,437

1,558

1,156

5,995

7,151

(2,148
)
1984
7/2/2001
911 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,215

4,861

2,024

1,215

6,885

8,100

(2,789
)
1985
4/30/1998
920 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

2,081

9,683

687

2,081

10,370

12,451

(4,084
)
1982
7/2/2001
921 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,044

4,176

639

1,044

4,815

5,859

(1,989
)
1983
4/30/1998
930 International Drive (O)
Linthicum, MD
8,488

1,013

4,053

1,100

1,013

5,153

6,166

(2,203
)
1986
4/30/1998
938 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,209

4,748

476

1,209

5,224

6,433

(1,615
)
1984
7/2/2001
939 Elkridge Landing Road (O)
Linthicum, MD
—

939

3,756

1,790

939

5,546

6,485

(2,452
)
1983
4/30/1998
940 Elkridge Landing Road (L)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,104

4,718

170

1,104

4,888

5,992

(4,884
)
(8)
7/2/2001
9651 Hornbaker Road (D)
Manassas, VA
—

6,050

196,428

253

6,050

196,681

202,731

(2,809
)
2010
9/14/2010
9690 Deereco Road (O)
Timonium, MD
—

3,415

13,723

5,833

3,415

19,556

22,971

(7,927
)
1988
12/21/1999
980 Technology Court (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

526

2,046

442

526

2,488

3,014

(585
)
1995
9/28/2005
985 Space Center Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

777

12,287

1,569

777

13,856

14,633

(2,948
)
1989
9/28/2005
9900 Franklin Square Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

979

3,466

202

979

3,668

4,647

(734
)
1999
1/9/2007
9910 Franklin Square Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
5,040

1,219

6,590

65

1,219

6,655

7,874

(1,457
)
2005
1/9/2007
9920 Franklin Square Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,058

5,293

1,429

1,058

6,722

7,780

(1,470
)
2006
1/9/2007
9925 Federal Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

1,129

4,334

80

1,129

4,414

5,543

(97
)
2008
9/28/2005
9930 Franklin Square Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,137

3,921

36

1,137

3,957

5,094

(795
)
2001
1/9/2007
9940 Franklin Square Drive (O)
White Marsh, MD
—

1,052

3,382

281

1,052

3,663

4,715

(732
)
2000
1/9/2007
9945 Federal Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

1,854

849

—

1,854

849

2,703

(13
)
2009
9/28/2005
9950 Federal Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

877

5,045

1,501

877

6,546

7,423

(1,944
)
2001
12/22/2005
9960 Federal Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

695

2,286

291

695

2,577

3,272

(256
)
2001
12/22/2005
9965 Federal Drive (L)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

466

—

—

466

—

466

—

(8)
12/22/2005
9965 Federal Drive (O)(10)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

1,401

6,061

565

1,401

6,626

8,027

(907
)
1983/2007
1/19/2006
999 Corporate Boulevard (O)
Linthicum, MD
13,533

1,187

8,332

556

1,187

8,888

10,075

(3,230
)
2000
8/1/1999
Aerotech Commerce (L)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

900

—

—

900

—

900

—

(8)
5/19/2006
Arborcrest (O)
Blue Bell, PA
—

21,969

83,529

1,094

21,969

84,623

106,592

(2,686
)
1991(6)(7)
10/14/1997
Arundel Preserve (L)
Hanover, MD
—

—

5,886

—

—

5,886

5,886

—

(8)
(9)
Ashburn Crossing - DC-8 (O)
Ashburn, VA
—

7,291

—

—

7,291

—

7,291

—

(7)
12/27/2012
Ashburn Crossing - DC-9 (O)
Ashburn, VA
—

4,192

—

—

4,192

—

4,192

—

(7)
12/27/2012
Ashburn Crossing (L)
Ashburn, VA
—

4,309

3

—

4,309

3

4,312

—

(8)
12/27/2012
Canton Crossing Land (L)
Baltimore, MD
—

16,085

1,820

—

16,085

1,820

17,905

—

(8)
10/27/2009
Canton Crossing Util Distr Ctr (O)
Baltimore, MD
—

7,300

15,550

722

7,300

16,272

23,572

(1,655
)
2005
10/27/2009
Columbia Gateway - Southridge (L)
Columbia, MD
—

6,387

2,938

—

6,387

2,938

9,325

—

(8)
9/20/2004
Dahlgren Technology Center (L)
Dahlgren, VA
—

1,083

178

—

1,083

178

1,261

—

(8)
3/16/2005
Expedition VII (L)
Lexington Park, MD
—

705

726

—

705

726

1,431

—

(8)
3/24/2004
Indian Head (L)
Bryans Road, MD
—

6,436

—

—

6,436

—

6,436

—

(8)
10/23/2006

F-55


 
 
 
Initial Cost
 
Gross Amounts Carried At Close of Period
 
 
 
Property (Type) (1)
Location
Encumbrances (2)
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Land
Building and Land Improvements
Total (3)(4)
Accumulated Depreciation (5)
Year Built or Renovated
Date Acquired (6)
InterQuest (L)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

14,515

8

—

14,515

8

14,523

—

(8)
9/28/2005
M Square Research Park (L)
College Park, MD
—

—

3,602

—

—

3,602

3,602

—

(8)
1/29/2008
National Business Park (L)
Annapolis Junction, MD
—

2,372

6,354

—

2,372

6,354

8,726

—

(8)
11/14/2003
National Business Park North (L)
Jessup, MD
—

25,654

25,069

—

25,654

25,069

50,723

—

(8)
6/29/2006
North Gate Business Park (L)
Aberdeen, MD
—

6,486

10,717

—

6,486

10,717

17,203

—

(8)
9/14/2007
Northwest Crossroads (L)
San Antonio, TX
—

7,430

836

—

7,430

836

8,266

—

(8)
1/20/2006
Old Annapolis Road (O)
Columbia, MD
—

1,637

5,500

2,103

1,637

7,603

9,240

(2,333
)
1974/1985
12/14/2000
Patriot Park (L)
Colorado Springs, CO
—

8,768

248

—

8,768

248

9,016

—

(8)
7/8/2005
Patriot Ridge (L)
Springfield, VA
—

18,517

10,873

—

18,517

10,873

29,390

—

(8)
3/10/2010
Redstone Gateway (L)
Huntsville, AL
—

—

13,700

—

—

13,700

13,700

—

(8)
3/23/2010
Route 15/Biggs Ford Road (L)
Frederick, MD
—

8,703

526

—

8,703

526

9,229

—

(8)
8/28/2008
Sentry Gateway (L)
San Antonio, TX
—

8,275

3,621

—

8,275

3,621

11,896

—

(8)
3/30/2005
West Nursery Road (L)
Linthicum, MD
—

1,441

53

—

1,441

53

1,494

—

(8)
10/28/2009
Westfields - Park Center (L)
Herndon, VA
—

3,609

2,640

—

3,609

2,640

6,249

—

(8)
7/18/2002
Westfields Corporate Center (L)
Herndon, VA
—

7,141

1,342

—

7,141

1,342

8,483

—

(8)
7/31/2002
White Marsh (L)
White Marsh, MD
—

30,322

10,385

—

30,322

10,385

40,707

—

(8)
1/9/2007
Woodland Park (L)
Herndon, VA
—

9,614

81

—

9,614

81

9,695

—

(8)
4/29/2004
Other Developments, including intercompany eliminations (V)
Various
—

7

(152
)
(438
)
7

(590
)
(583
)
689

Various
Various
 
 
$
1,015,130

$
681,001

$
2,893,547

$
285,412

$
681,001

$
3,178,959

$
3,859,960

$
(568,176
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
A legend for the Property Type follows: (O) = Office Property; (L) = Land held or pre-construction; (D) = Data Center; and (V) = Various.
(2)
Excludes our term loan facilities of $770.0 million, senior exchangeable notes of $230.9 million, unsecured notes payable of $1.8 million, and net premiums on the remaining loans of $1.3 million.
(3)
The aggregate cost of these assets for Federal income tax purposes was approximately $3.4 billion at December 31, 2012.
(4)
As discussed in Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, we recognized impairment losses of $46.1 million in connection with our property in Greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and $19.0 million, including exit costs, in connection with certain properties included in our Strategic Reallocation Plan.
(5)
The estimated lives over which depreciation is recognized follow: Building and land improvements: 10-40 years; and tenant improvements: related lease terms.
(6)
The acquisition date of multi-parcel properties reflects the date of the earliest parcel acquisition.
(7)
Under construction or redevelopment at December 31, 2012.
(8)
Held or under pre-construction at December 31, 2012.
(9)
Development in progress in anticipation of acquisition at December 31, 2012.
(10)
Included in our Strategic Reallocation Plan and classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2012.

F-56


The following table summarizes our changes in cost of properties for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
Beginning balance
 
 
$
4,038,932

 
$
3,948,487

 
$
3,452,512

 
Acquisitions of operating properties
 
 
33,684

 
26,887

 
187,052

 
Improvements and other additions
 
 
214,418

 
304,079

 
338,358

 
Sales
 
 
(291,491
)
 
(75,315
)
 
(29,430
)
 
Impairments
 
 
(121,557
)
 
(165,206
)
 
—

 
Other dispositions
 
 
(13,891
)
 
—

 
—

 
Other
 
 
(135
)
 
—

 
(5
)
 
Ending balance
 
 
$
3,859,960

 
$
4,038,932

 
$
3,948,487

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table summarizes our changes in accumulated depreciation for the same time periods (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
Beginning balance
 
 
$
577,601

 
$
503,032

 
$
422,612

 
Depreciation expense
 
 
93,158

 
99,173

 
88,048

 
Sales
 
 
(40,346
)
 
(9,640
)
 
(7,764
)
 
Impairments
 
 
(58,855
)
 
(15,039
)
 
—

 
Other dispositions
 
 
(3,247
)
 
—

 
—

 
Other
 
 
(135
)
 
75

 
136

 
Ending balance
 
 
$
568,176

 
$
577,601

 
$
503,032

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



F-57