-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, OlAiVmkjC69Q1kL1xbc9NUAhW8FrRWlI2Yu6FeRHdDSo9ymsONGDj1cq1jVVFOIA EbpBtB5nekvZgP5fP8pSyA== 0000950144-05-007973.txt : 20050801 0000950144-05-007973.hdr.sgml : 20050801 20050801134704 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950144-05-007973 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20041231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20050801 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20050801 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II LP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000829905 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: LAND SUBDIVIDERS & DEVELOPERS (NO CEMETERIES) [6552] IRS NUMBER: 232498841 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K/A SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-17680 FILM NUMBER: 05987546 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 250 KING OF PRUSSIA RD CITY: RADNOR STATE: PA ZIP: 19087 BUSINESS PHONE: 2159647271 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II L.P. STREET 2: 250 KING OF PRUSSIA RD CITY: RADNOR STATE: PA ZIP: 19087 10-K/A 1 g96570e10vkza.htm SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II, L.P. Southeast Acquisitions II, L.P.
Table of Contents

 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K / A
     
þ   AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004.
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-17680 (FORMERLY 33-20255)
 
SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II, L.P.
 
     
(Name of issuer in its charter)    
Delaware   23-2498841
(State of incorporation)   (IRS Employer Identification Organization Number)
3011 Armory Drive, Suite 310
Nashville, Tennessee 37204
 
(Address of principal executive offices)
Issuer’s telephone no., including area code: (615) 833-8716
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act.
Name of each exchange: None
Title of each class on which registered: Not Applicable
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
Limited Partnership Units $1,000 Per Unit
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past (90) days. Yes þ No o
Check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12-b2) Yes o No þ
 
 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
       
 
       
  BUSINESS   1
 
  Background   1
 
  Material Recent Developments   2
 
  Employees   2
 
  Competition   2
 
  Trademarks and Patents   2
 
       
  PROPERTIES   2
 
       
  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS   4
 
       
  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS   4
 
       
       
 
       
  MARKET FOR THE PARTNERSHIP’S UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS   4
 
       
  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA   4
 
  SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA   5
 
       
  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS   6
 
  Background   6
 
  Results of Operations   6
 
  2004 Compared to 2003   6
 
  2003 Compared to 2002   7
 
  Liquidity and Capital Resources   7
 
  Controls and Procedures   7
 
  Critical Accounting Policies   7
 
       
  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA   8
 
       
  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE   8
 
       
       
 
       
  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP   8
 
       
  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION   9
 
       
  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT   9
 
  Security Ownership of Management   9
 
  Changes in Control   9
 Ex-31.1 Section 302 Certification of the PEO & PFO
 Ex-32.1 Section 906 Certification of the PEO & PFO
- i -

 


Table of Contents

             
ITEM 13.   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS   10
 
           
ITEM 14.   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES   10
 
           
           
 
           
ITEM 15.   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K   10
 
      (a) Index to Financial Statements   10
 
      (b) Reports on Form 8-K   10
 
      (c) Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K)   10
 
           
           
- ii -

 


Table of Contents

PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
          Background
          Southeast Acquisitions II, L.P. (the “Partnership”) was formed on December 14, 1987, as a Delaware limited partnership. The Partnership’s public offering of 9,650 units of limited partnership interest (“Units”) commenced on June 8, 1988 and terminated on July 18, 1988 when all 9,650 Units were sold. The Partnership was scheduled to terminate on December 31, 2000. There are currently no plans to extend the Partnership agreement. Since there is land remaining at December 31, 2004, the current General Partner will continue to operate in the liquidation mode until all of the Partnership’s Property is sold.
          The Partnership purchased the following three parcels of unimproved land in 1988; 353 acres in Henry County, Georgia; 91 acres in Greenville, South Carolina; and 135 acres in Rutherford County, Tennessee. The Partnership’s primary business objective is to realize appreciation in the value of the three parcels of unimproved land (each a “Property”, collectively the “Properties”), by holding the Properties for investment and eventual sale, although there is no assurance that this will be attained.
          Since acquisition, the Partnership has sold all of its Georgia Property, all of its South Carolina Property, and approximately 68% of its Tennessee Property. All remaining land is currently being marketed.
          The timing and manner of sale will be determined by Southern Management Group, LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership. The General Partner generally has the right to sell Property, or portions thereof, without the consent of the Limited Partners. The Partnership Agreement provides, however, that a majority in interest of the Limited Partners must consent to the sale or disposition at one time of 60% or more of the real estate acreage held by the Partnership as of September 22, 1997 unless the sale or disposition is being made in connection with the liquidation of the Partnership pursuant to the Partnership Agreement or in the event that the net proceeds of the sale, when distributed in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, will be sufficient to provide the Limited Partners with distributions equal to the acquisition cost of the assets sold.
          The General Partner believes that the Partnership’s cash reserves will be sufficient to last for at least one more year assuming no significant increases in expenses. However, if the reserves are exhausted and the Partnership is unable to borrow funds, the Partnership may have to sell the Property on unfavorable terms.
          The General Partner has no plans to develop the Properties, except for activities including rezoning, land planning, market surveys and other activities necessary to prepare the Properties for sale. There can be no assurance that necessary funds would be available should it be desirable for the Partnership to improve the Properties to facilitate their sale.
          At a special meeting of Limited Partners held on November 5, 1997, the Partnership Agreement was amended to (i) extend the term of the Partnership from its original expiration date of December 31, 1998 to December 31, 2000; (ii) substitute Southern Management Group, LLC for Southeast Acquisitions, Inc. as the general partner of the Partnership; (iii) authorize new commissions and new management fees for the new General Partner; (iv) give the new General Partner the exclusive right to sell Partnership Property; and (v) modify the Partnership Agreement to require that a majority in interest of the limited Partners must consent to the sale or disposition at one time of 60% or more of the real estate acreage held by the Partnership as of September 22, 1997 unless the sale or disposition is being made in connection with the liquidation of the Partnership pursuant to the Partnership Agreement or the net proceeds of the sale, when distributed in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, will be sufficient to provide the Limited Partners with distributions equal to the acquisition cost of the assets sold.

1


Table of Contents

          Material Recent Developments
          During 2004 the Partnership sold approximately 1.88 acres of its Rutherford County, Tennessee Property for a sales price of $995,000 and recognized a gain of $679,646. During 2003 there were no sales of Partnership Property. During the first quarter of 2005, the Partnership has entered into a contract to sell approximately 37.25 acres of the remaining Rutherford County, Tennessee Property. This contract allows for a stepped purchase price based on when the sale occurs. If the sale occurs within 210 days of the contract date, the sales price will be $170,000 per acre. If the sale occurs within 360 days of the contract date, the sales price will be $180,000 per acre and if the sale occurs within 420 days of the contract date, the sales price will be $190,000 per acre. There are contract contingencies that could allow the purchaser to terminate the agreement. There can be no assurance that this transaction will close.
          Employees
          The Partnership presently has no employees. The General Partner manages and controls the affairs of the Partnership. (See Part III, Item 10, Directors and Executive Officers of the Partnership).
          Competition
          The General Partner believes that there is significant direct competition within a five-mile radius of the Properties. The Property is located in middle Tennessee.
          Trademarks and Patents
          The Partnership has no trademarks or patents.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
          The Partnership owns approximately 43 acres of undeveloped land in Rutherford County, Tennessee.
          Henry County, Georgia Property:
          All of the Henry County, Georgia Property has been sold.
          The Partnership sold approximately 13 acres during 1988 and 1989, 15 acres in 1992, 47 acres in 1993, 73 acres in 1994 and 25 acres in 1995.
          During 1998, the Partnership sold approximately 44 acres for a gross sales price of approximately $209,500 less commissions and expenses.
          During 1999, the Partnership closed the sale of 69.122 acres of Henry County Property for $138,244 less commissions and expenses.
          On March 3, 2000, the Partnership closed the sale of the remaining land for $298,100 less commissions and expenses.
          Greenville, South Carolina Property:
          All of the Greenville, South Carolina Property has been sold.
          During 1997, the Partnership sold approximately 1 acre of the Greenville Property for $160,000 per acre.
          On April 7, 1998, the Partnership closed the sale of 1.9 acres of the Greenville Property for approximately $317,000 less commissions and expenses.

2


Table of Contents

          On May 11, 1998, the Partnership closed the sale of .277 acres of the Greenville Property for approximately $27,700 less commissions and expenses.
          On July 30, 1998, the Partnership closed the sale of 2.049 acres of the Greenville Property for approximately $342,000 less commissions and expenses.
          On August 5, 1998, the Partnership closed the sale of 17.316 acres of the Greenville Property for approximately $1,645,000 less commissions and expenses.
          On August 17, 1999, the Partnership closed the sale of the remaining land for approximately $699,500 less commissions and expenses.
          Rutherford County, Tennessee Property:
          The Rutherford County, Tennessee Property is located approximately 18 miles southeast of the Nashville Central business district and 10 miles southeast of the Nashville Metropolitan Airport. Following a sale of four acres in 1995, 32.514 acres in 1997, and 52.281 acres in January 2001, .41 acres in October 2002 and 1.88 acres in July 2004 the Property consists of approximately 43 acres in the northeast quadrant of the I-24/Sam Ridley interchange, with frontage on the access road. The four acres sold in 1995 were part of the Property located at the northwest corner of the I-24 interchange. This land was located along Sam Ridley and was the portion of the Property located furthest from the interchange itself and was sold for a price of $50,000 per acre. The 32.514-acre sale in 1997 and the 52.281 acre sale in January 2001, were also at $50,000 per acre. During 1998 and 1999 there were no sales of Rutherford County, Tennessee Property but the Partnership sold an easement for $101,500 less commissions in 1998 and another utility easement in 1999 for $17,658. In 2000, the Partnership recognized an additional $7,509 in relation to the 1999 utility easement sale. The .41 acres sold in 2002 for a sales price of $112,385. The 1.88 acres sold in 2004 were sold for a sales price of $995,000 less an allowance to the purchaser for underground storm detention and landscaping. The Partnership also agreed to pay for site preparation for the land, which included grading, water and sewer extension and paving.
          In an effort to make future development of the Property easier, all of the Property has now been zoned for commercial use and is located entirely within the Smyrna City Limits rather than part in the City of Smyrna and part in the City of LaVergne. There is a small cemetery located in the northwest quadrant of I-24, which the former general partner was aware of at the time of purchase, and which the General Partner does not believe will have an adverse effect on the Partnership’s ability to sell the land. The I-24/Sam Ridley Parkway interchange is one exit south of Interchange City Industrial Park, the largest industrial park in the Nashville area, and is currently the last I-24 interchange south of the city to which sewer lines are available. At December 31, 1997, I-24 was being widened to three lanes in each direction from Bell Road in Nashville to the Sam Ridley interchange. This widening was completed in 1998. In 1999 I-24 was being widened to three lanes from Sam Ridley interchange to the I-840 interchange approximately 9 miles south of the property. This was completed in 2000. In 2001, Hospital Corporation of America announced plans to build a major medical facility on the southeast quadrant of the I-24 interchange. The facility is located immediately across the street from the remaining Rutherford County, Tennessee Property. It is estimated to cost seventy-six million dollars and was completed in 2003.
          The former general partner had the Rutherford County Property appraised in 1996 by Martin Appraisal Services. The appraiser had no affiliation with the former general partner, although the president of Martin Appraisal Services served as a vice president of an affiliate of the current General Partner from April 1984 to August 1987. The Property was appraised in two tracts; one consisting of 84.5 acres for $2,250,000, or approximately $26,627 per acre, and the second consisting of 45.05 acres for $2,000,000, or approximately $44,395 per acre. The appraiser used the sales comparison (market) approach to value the Property in bulk. The appraiser also estimated the value of the Property if developed and sold as lots to end-users. The appraiser was able to use several sales of land that occurred in the past few years along Sam Ridley Parkway in the sales comparison approach. In the development analysis, the appraiser evaluated the sale of tracts of land over a three-year period and estimated the costs of necessary utility improvements. Due to the short period of time estimated as an absorption period, the appraiser did not discount the cash flow for the absorption period.
          The appraised value does not reflect costs, expenses and commissions, which would be incurred in connection with a sale of the property. Moreover, appraisals are only an approximation of current market value, which can only be established by an actual sale.

3


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
          The Partnership is not directly a party to, nor is the Partnership’s Property directly the subject of, any material legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF ITEMS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
          There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders in 2004.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE PARTNERSHIP’S UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST AND RELATED SECURITY
             HOLDER MATTERS
          There is no established public trading market for the Units and it is not anticipated that any will develop in the future. The Partnership commenced an offering to the public on June 8, 1988 of 9,650 units of limited partnership interests. The offering of $9,650,000 was fully subscribed and terminated on June 24, 1988. As of December 31, 2004, there were 472 limited partners in the Partnership.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
                                         
    For the Year     For the Year     For the Year     For the Year     For the Year  
    Ended     Ended     Ended     Ended     Ended  
    December 31,     December 31,     December 31,     December 31,     December 31,  
    2004     2003     2002     2001     2000  
 
Operating Revenues
  $ 680,791     $ 1,983     $ 100,315     $ 2,008,594     $ 244,963  
 
Net Income (Loss)
  $ 581,140     $ (48,431 )   $ 66,579     $ 1,938,972     $ 198,000  
 
Net Income (Loss) per Unit of Limited Partnership Interest
  $ 60.22     $ (5.02 )   $ 6.90     $ 200.93     $ 20.52  
 
 
                                       
Total Assets
  $ 540,011     $ 498,682     $ 546,923     $ 510,350     $ 1,082,329  
 
 
                                       
Long Term Obligations
  NONE   NONE   NONE   NONE   NONE
 
                                       
Cash Distributions Declared per Unit of Limited Partnership Interest
  $ 60     $NONE   $NONE   $ 260     $ 30  

4


Table of Contents

          SELECTED QUARTELY FINANCIAL DATA
                                                                 
    For the     For the     For the     For the     For the     For the     For the     For the  
    Quarter Ended     Quarter Ended     Quarter Ended     Quarter Ended     Quarter Ended     Quarter Ended     Quarter Ended     Quarter Ended  
    December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September30,     June 30,     March 31,  
    2004     2004     2004     2004     2003     2003     2004     2003  
 
Operating (Loss) Revenue
  $ (407 )   $ 680,754     $ 202     $ 242     $ 305     $ 372     $ 621     $ 685  
 
                                                               
Gross Profit*
    N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A  
 
                                                               
Net (Loss) Income before Extra- ordinary Items and Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
  $ (19,791 )   $ 618,302     $ (8,624 )   $ (8,747 )   $ (11,673 )   $ (25,122 )   $ (5,622 )   $ (6,014 )
 
                                                               
Net (Loss) Income per Unit of Limited Partnership Interest
  $ (2.05 )   $ 64.07     $ (0.89 )   $ (0.91 )   $ (1.22 )   $ (2.60 )   $ (0.58 )   $ (0.62 )
 
                                                               
Net (Loss) Income
  $ (19,791 )   $ 618,302     $ (8,624 )   $ (8,747 )   $ (11,673 )   $ (25,122 )   $ (5,622 )   $ (6,014 )
 
*   In the real estate industry, costs of sales are netted in the gain on sale of land and are included in operating revenues; therefore, there is no breakdown for gross profit.

5


Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
          Background
          The Partnership was formed to acquire and realize appreciation in the Property by holding it for investment and eventual sale. However, there can be no assurance that the Partnership’s objectives will be realized.
          Results of Operations
          The Partnership had no operations from the date of its formation on December 14, 1987 until June 24, 1988 when it acquired the first Property and sold 3,165 units of limited partnership interest. During 1988 the Partnership acquired three additional Properties and sold 6,485 additional Units of limited partnership interests.
          In 1988 the Partnership purchased 579 acres of unimproved land at three locations. The status of these Properties at December 31, 2004 is as follows:
                         
            Property Sold Prior to     Remaining Property Held  
Place   Property Purchased     December 31, 2004     for Sale  
 
Henry County,
  353 Acres   353 Acres   -0- Acres
Georgia
                       
 
                       
Greenville,
  91 Acres   91 Acres   -0- Acres
South Carolina
                       
 
                       
Rutherford County,
  135 Acres   92 Acres   43 Acres
Tennessee
                       
          2004 Compared to 2003
          During 2004, the Partnership sold approximately 1.88 acres of its Rutherford County, Tennessee Property for a sales price of $995,000 and recognized a gain of $679,646. As part of the contract the Partnership agreed to give the purchaser a $30,000 underground storm detention allowance and a $20,000 landscaping allowance. The storm detention allowance and landscaping allowance were both credited to the Purchaser at closing. The Partnership also agreed to pay for site preparation for the land, which included grading, water and sewer extension and paving. All of this work was completed by year end and the cost to the Partnership was $137,954. There is no continuing involvement between the Partnership and the buyer and there is no further commitment or plans to extend the water and sewer. During 2003, the Partnership had no sales of Partnership Property. Revenue in 2004 also consisted of interest income of $1,145 as compared to $1,983 in 2003. The interest was lower due to a lower cash reserve. The Partnership made cash distributions of $60 per unit to the Limited Partners in 2004. There were no cash distributions to the Limited Partners in 2003.
          Expenses during 2004 were $99,651 consisting of general and administrative expense of $54,984, franchise and excise taxes of $35,842, real estate taxes of $8,518 and insurance of $307. The general and administrative expenses included $21,152 in accounting fees, which represent an increase of $4,446 over 2003. This increase is due to new auditing procedures required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The general and administrative expenses also included $6,528 in legal fees, which represent an increase of $5,681 over 2003. The increase is due to legal fees related to the sale of land mentioned above. The franchise and excise taxes were $33,983 higher than in 2003, when the Partnership paid $1,859 in franchise and excise taxes. The increase in taxes is related to the gain on the sale of land in 2004. The real estate taxes in 2004 were $6,905 higher than in 2003, when the Partnership paid $1,613 in real estate taxes. The increase in 2004 was due to the reclassification of one parcel of land from agricultural to commercial, which resulted in a higher tax rate. The insurance in 2004 was $77 higher that in 2003, when the Partnership paid $230 for insurance

6


Table of Contents

          2003 Compared to 2002
          During 2003, the Partnership had no sales of Partnership Property as compared to 2002, when the Partnership sold approximately one half acre in Rutherford County, Tennessee for a gain of $97,794. Revenue in 2003 consisted of interest earned of $1,983 compared to $2,521 in 2002. The interest was lower due to a lower cash reserve. There were no cash distributions to the Limited Partners in 2003 or 2002.
          Expenses during 2003 were $50,414 consisting of general and administrative expenses of $46,712, franchise and excise taxes of $1,859, real estate taxes of $1,613 and insurance of $230. The general and administrative expenses included $17,553 in accounting and legal fees, which represents a decrease of $4,988 from 2002. In 2002 the Partnership required additional legal assistance related to a quitclaim deed for right-of-way. The general and administrative expenses for 2003 also included $26,920 in professional fees compared to $3,684 in 2002. The increase was due to fees paid to consultants to develop a marketing and grading plan to subdivide the remaining property in Rutherford County, Tennessee into 14 sites of one to two acre sites. The Partnership has no current plans to complete this work. There were no such fees in 2002. The franchise and excise taxes were $2,377 lower than in 2002, when the Partnership paid $4,236 related to the gains on the sale of land. The real estate taxes in 2003 were $360 higher than in 2002, when the Partnership paid $1,253 in real estate taxes, which included $1,167 in greenbelt rollback taxes that were paid in relation to the Rutherford County land sale. The increase in 2003 was due to the reclassification of one parcel of land from agricultural to commercial, which resulted in a higher tax rate.
          Inflation did not have a material impact on operations during 2004, 2003 and 2002.
          Liquidity and Capital Resources
          Cash generated by operating activities varies from year to year based on the level of land sale activity. The Partnership had cash reserves, net of accounts payable, of $12,637 at December 31, 2004. The General Partner believes that the Partnership has sufficient cash reserves to cover normal partnership expenses through the liquidation mode. However, if additional expenses are incurred or should the Partnership decide to construct infrastructure improvements to enhance the marketability of the Property, the reserves may be inadequate to cover the Partnership’s operating expenses. If the reserves are exhausted, the Partnership may have to dispose of some of the Property or incur indebtedness on unfavorable terms.
          Controls and Procedures
          (a) Within the ninety day period prior to the date of this report (the “Evaluation Date”), we carried out an evaluation under supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, concluded that as of the Evaluation Date our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
          (b) There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date we carried out this evaluation.
          Critical Accounting Policies
          The Partnership’s financial statements are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Partnership was scheduled to terminate on December 31, 2000 and is continuing to operate in liquidation mode. No adjustments are necessary to present the Partnership’s financial statements on the liquidation basis of accounting. Land is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated cost to sell. Sales of land are recognized upon the closing of an enforceable sales contract and the Partnership’s execution of its obligations under the contract.

7


Table of Contents

     
ITEM 8.
  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
          The Partnership’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 together with the report of the Partnership’s independent auditors, Williams Benator & Libby, LLP, are included in this Form 10-K.
     
ITEM 9.
  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
          Not Applicable.
PART III
     
ITEM 10.
  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
          The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. The General Partner manages and controls the affairs of the Partnership and has responsibility for all aspects of the Partnership’s operations. The current members and executive officers and directors of the General Partner are identified and described below.
          The General Partner is a Tennessee limited liability company whose members are Richard W. Sorenson, who owns a 50% interest in the General Partner and has a 51% voting right and Southeast Venture LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company, which owns 50% and has a 49% voting right.
          Mr. Sorenson, age 79, has over 40 years experience in several real estate disciplines, including land acquisition and development, development of office buildings, shopping centers, warehouses and medical facilities. All of these activities occurred in the southeastern United States.
          Mr. Sorenson was President of Phoenix Investment Company (“Phoenix”), a publicly owned, Atlanta based real estate development and investment firm from 1965 to 1970. Concurrent with his employment at Phoenix, he was President of First Atlanta Realty Fund, a publicly owned real estate investment trust. During his tenure with the trust, he served as a Trustee of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts.
          Following his departure from Phoenix in 1970, Mr. Sorenson became Vice President of Cousins Properties in Atlanta, where he was responsible for development of office buildings, shopping centers and apartments until 1971. Until forming Southeast Venture Companies (“SV”) in 1979, Mr. Sorenson was an independent real estate developer.
          Mr. Sorenson was co-founder of SV in 1979. In 1992, substantially all of the assets of SV were sold to Southeast Venture Corporation.
          Mr. Sorenson is a graduate of the Northwestern University Business School with a major in real estate.
          The other member of the General Partner is Southeast Venture LLC (“SVLLC”). The officers and key employees of SVLLC include the following:
          Paul J. Plummer, age 55. Mr. Plummer is a registered architect and serves as director of architectural services for SVLLC. Mr. Plummer is responsible for facility programming, planning, master planning, facility assessment and design. Before joining SVLLC in 1986, Mr. Plummer served as a partner and director of design for the Nashville-based architecture and engineering firm of Gresham, Smith and Partners. In that capacity he was responsible for the design and planning of over 15 major projects throughout the United States and Saudi Arabia. Mr. Plummer earned his bachelor of architecture degree from the University of Kentucky and is a member of the American Institute of Architects.

8


Table of Contents

          Wood S. Caldwell, age 51. Mr. Caldwell is responsible for all site development activities on behalf of commercial and health care clients of SVLLC, including managing all design consultants, permitting, scheduling, budgeting and construction management. He contributes to SVLLC’s development team in the areas of land planning, zoning, permitting, engineering and construction. Before joining SVC in 1985, Mr. Caldwell served as a professional engineer for Gresham, Smith and Partners. As the prime site design engineer for Gresham, Smith and Partners, Mr. Caldwell produced and coordinated site development plans for over 50 separate medical facilities in over 40 different communities throughout the southeast. Mr. Caldwell earned his bachelor of engineering degree from the Vanderbilt University School of Engineering.
          Axson E. West, age 50. Mr. West serves as vice president of brokerage services for SVLLC, specializing in office and industrial leasing, improved property sales and land disposition for several commercial and residential projects. Mr. West has sold real estate and real estate securities since 1980 and, since joining SVC in 1988, he has been responsible for the disposition of land encompassing industrial, office and retail developments. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Vanderbilt University and is a Certified Commercial Investment Member, a designation of the Commercial Investment Real Estate Institute.
          Cameron W. Sorenson, age 43. Mr. Sorenson serves as director of vertical development for SVLLC. He is primarily responsible for providing development and project management for the clients of SVLLC. Prior to assuming these responsibilities, Mr. Sorenson was project director for two large-scale land development ventures for SVLLC. Prior to joining SVC in 1987, Mr. Sorenson was with Trust Company Bank in Atlanta, as an officer in the National Division, managing a credit portfolio in excess of $150 million. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in finance from the MacIntyre School of Business at the University of Virginia. Cameron Sorenson is the son of Richard W. Sorenson, the individual majority member of the General Partner.
          Randy W. Parham, age 49. Mr. Parham is the President of SVLLC. He is primarily responsible for property management, park and association management and also specializes in real estate development and brokerage. Mr. Parham is a licensed real estate broker and architect. Prior to joining SVLLC in 1998, Mr. Parham was a project manager with Gresham, Smith and Partners from 1978 to 1983 and was responsible for overall project management of project team and project financial management. Following his departure from Gresham, Smith and Partners, Mr. Parham joined MetroCenter Properties, Inc., an 850 acre mixed-use development in Nashville, Tennessee. He was Vice-President and was responsible for initiation and development of new projects, land sales and lease negotiations. In 1991 he purchased the assets of Metro Center Properties and formed Metro Center Management, Inc. where he served as President through 1997.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
          During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership did not pay compensation to any officers of the General Partner. No management fees were paid during 2004, 2003 or 2002 since the Partnership was operating in the liquidation mode. See Item 13 of this report, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
          As of December 31, 2004 no person or “group” (as that term is used in Section 13(d) (3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was known to the Partnership to beneficially own more than 5% of the Units of the Partnership.
          Security Ownership of Management
          No individual member, or director or officer of a member, of the General Partner nor such directors or officers as a group, owns any of the Partnership’s outstanding securities. The General Partner owns a general partnership interest which entitles it to receive 30% of cash distributions after the Limited Partners have received cumulative distributions equal to a 10% non-compounded Cumulative Annual Return on their Adjusted Capital Contribution plus a return of their Capital Contributions as those terms are defined in the Partnership Agreement. The General Partner will share in taxable income to reflect cash distributions or, to the extent there are losses, 1% of such losses.

9


Table of Contents

          Changes in Control
          There are no arrangements known to the Partnership that would at any subsequent date result in a change in control of the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
          From 1988 through 1996, the Partnership paid $18,753 annually as an administration fee to the former general partner. This fee was computed as one quarter of one percent of the base cost of the land. The cumulative amount of such fee could not exceed $150,021 and, as of December 31, 1996, fees charged since inception amounted t $150,021. As of November 5, 1997, the Limited Partners voted and agreed to pay the new General Partner, Southern Management Group, LLC, a fee of $2,915 for the period November 5, 1997 through December 31, 1997 and annual fees of $19,000 from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2000. Any fee payments would cease at a date when the Partnership was liquidated.
          The General Partner will also receive 30% of cash distributions after the Limited Partners have received (i) cumulative distributions equal to a 10% Cumulative Annual Return on their Adjusted Capital Contributions plus (ii) a return of their Capital Contributions (as those terms are defined in the Partnership Agreement). During 2004, 2003 and 2002, the General Partner received no cash distributions.
          At the special meeting of Limited Partners held on November 5, 1997, the Partnership Agreement was amended to provide that total compensation paid to all persons, including the General Partner, for the sale of the Partnership’s property is limited to a competitive real estate commission or disposition fee not to exceed 10% of the contract price of the sale of the property. Any such real estate commission or disposition fee paid to the General Partner will reduce any distribution to which it would otherwise be entitled under the amended Partnership Agreement. In addition, the Partnership Agreement was amended to provide that the General Partner may act as the exclusive agent for the sale of the Property. During 2004 and 2002, the Partnership paid real estate sales commissions of $69,650 and $7,867, respectively, to the General Partner or its affiliates. There were no sales of land during the year ended December 31, 2003.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
          Fees billed by the principal auditors during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 consisted of the following:
                 
    2004     2003  
 
 
               
Audit fees
  $ 8,877     $ 8,738  
 
               
 
 
               
Quarterly reviews
  $ 3,600     $ 3,000  
 
               
 
 
               
Tax preparation fees
  $ 5,969     $ 5,872  
 
               
 
 
               
Total fees
  $ 18,446     $ 17.610  
 
               
 
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
          (a) Index to Financial Statements
Page

10


Table of Contents

     
Report of Independent Auditors
  F-1
Balance Sheets
  F-2
Statements of Operations
  F-3
Statements of Partners’ Equity
  F-4
Statements of Cash Flow
  F-5
Notes to Financial Statements
  F-6
      Schedules have been omitted because they are inappropriate, not required, or the information is included elsewhere in the financial statements or notes thereto.
  (b)   Reports on Form 8-K
      No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Partnership during the
fourth quarter of 2004.
  (c)   Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K)
         
Exhibit Numbers   Description   Page Numbers
3.1 (a)
  Certificate of Limited Partnership   *
 
       
3.1 (b) & (4)
  Restated Limited Partnership Agreement   **
 
       
3.1(c)
  First Amendment to Restated Limited Partnership Agreement   E-1
 
       
9
  Not Applicable    
 
       
11
  Not Applicable    
 
       
12
  Not Applicable    
 
       
13
  Not Applicable    
 
       
16
  Not Applicable    
 
       
18
  Not Applicable    
 
       
19
  Not Applicable    
 
       
22
  Not Applicable    
 
       
24
  Not Applicable    
 
       
25
  Not Applicable    
 
       
29
  Not Applicable    
 
       
31.1
  Certification Pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.    
 
       
32.1
  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.    
 
*   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed as part of the Exhibits to the Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form S-18, Registration No. 33-20255.
 
**   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 filed as part of the Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form S-18, Registration No. 33-20255.

11


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
             
    SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II, L.P.    
    a Delaware limited partnership    
 
           
 
  By:   SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC    
 
      General Partner    
 
           
 
  By:   /s/ Richard W. Sorenson    
 
           
 
      RICHARD W. SORENSON    
 
      President and Chief Executive Officer    

12

EX-31.1 2 g96570exv31w1.txt EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PEO & PFO EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Richard W. Sorenson, Principal Executive Officer and Member of Southeast Management Group, LLC, general partner of Southeast Acquisitions II, L.P. ("Registrant") certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, of Southeast Acquisitions II, L.P. ("Registrant"); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 29, 2005 /s/ Richard W. Sorenson ------------------------------------- Richard W. Sorenson, Principal Executive Officer & Member Southern Management Group, LLC CERTIFICATION I, Laura E. Ristvedt, Principal Financial Officer of Southeast Management Group, LLC, general partner of Southeast Acquisitions II, L.P. ("Registrant") certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, of Southeast Acquisitions II, L.P. ("Registrant"); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 29, 2005 /s/ Laura E. Ristvedt ------------------------------ Laura E. Ristvedt Principal Financial Officer Southern Management Group, LLC EX-32.1 3 g96570exv32w1.txt EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PEO & PFO EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTON 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Southeast Acquisitions II, L P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissions on the date hereof I, Richard W. Sorenson, the principal executive officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Partnership. /s/ Richard W. Sorenson - ----------------------- Richard W. Sorenson Richard W. Sorenson Principal Executive Officer & Member Southern Management Group, LLC July 29, 2005 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTON 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Southeast Acquisitions II, L P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissions on the date hereof I, Laura E. Ristvedt, the principal financial officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Partnership. /s/ Laura E. Ristvedt - --------------------- Laura E. Ristvedt Laura E. Ristvedt Principal Financial Officer Southern Management Group, LLC July 29, 2005
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----