UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________________
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from ______ to ______
|
Commission file number 1-14279
_______________________
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
06-1209561
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45101 Warp Drive
Dulles, Virginia 20166
(Address of principal executive offices)
(703) 406-5000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
||
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
The New York Stock Exchange
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
|
_______________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrant's Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing sales price of the registrant's Common Stock as reported on The New York Stock Exchange on June 28, 2013 was approximately $1,029,000,000.
As of February 18, 2014, 60,547,861 shares of the registrant's Common Stock were outstanding.
Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed on or about March 10, 2014 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.
|
|
||
|
Item
|
|
Page
|
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
Pegasus is a registered trademark and service mark of Orbital Sciences Corporation; Taurus is a registered trademark of Orbital Sciences Corporation; Orbital, Minotaur, Antares and Cygnus are trademarks of Orbital Sciences Corporation.
PART I
General
We develop and manufacture small- and medium-class rockets and space systems for commercial, military and civil government customers, including the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA"), other U.S. Government agencies, and major domestic and international commercial satellite operators. Our products and services are grouped into three reportable business segments: launch vehicles, satellites and space systems, and advanced space programs, which are described below.
| ● | Launch Vehicles - Rockets that are used as small- and medium-class space launch vehicles that place satellites into Earth orbit and escape trajectories, interceptor and target vehicles for missile defense systems, and suborbital launch vehicles that place payloads into a variety of high-altitude trajectories. |
| ● | Satellites and Space Systems - Small- and medium-class satellites that are used to enable global and regional communications and broadcasting, conduct space-related scientific research, collect imagery and other remotely-sensed data about the Earth, carry out interplanetary and other deep-space exploration missions, and demonstrate new space technologies . |
| ● | Advanced Space Programs - Human-rated space systems for Earth-orbit and deep-space exploration, and small- and medium-class satellites used for national security space programs and to demonstrate new space technologies, and advanced flight systems for atmospheric and space missions. |
Our general strategy is to develop and expand a core integrated set of space and launch systems technologies and products, focusing on the design and manufacture of affordable rockets, satellites and other space systems in order to establish and expand positions in niche markets that have not typically been emphasized by our larger competitors. Another part of our strategy is to seek customer contracts that will fund new product development and enhancements to our existing launch vehicle and space systems product lines. As a result of our capabilities and experience in designing, developing, manufacturing and operating a broad range of small- and medium-class rockets and space systems, we believe we are well positioned to capitalize on the demand for more affordable space-technology systems in commercial satellite communications, space-based military and intelligence operations, and missile defense programs, and to take advantage of government-sponsored initiatives in human space exploration, space-based scientific research and interplanetary exploration
Orbital was incorporated in Delaware in 1987 to consolidate the assets, liabilities and operations of two predecessor entities established in 1982 and 1983. Our corporate headquarters are located at 45101 Warp Drive, Dulles, Virginia 20166, our telephone number is (703) 406-5000 and our website is www.orbital.com.
Description of Orbital's Products and Services
Launch Vehicles
Our launch vehicles segment develops and produces space launch vehicles, interceptor launch vehicles and target launch vehicles.
Space Launch Vehicles - We develop and produce small-class launch vehicles that place satellites weighing up to 4,000 lbs. into low-Earth orbit, including the Pegasus and Minotaur space launch vehicles that are used by commercial, civil government and military customers. Our Pegasus launch vehicle is launched from our L-1011 carrier aircraft to deploy relatively lightweight satellites into low-Earth orbit. The ground-launched Minotaur launch vehicle family combines Minuteman II and Peacekeeper ballistic missile rocket motors with our Pegasus technology to carry heavier payloads into orbit. In 2013, we conducted one successful Pegasus launch, a successful Minotaur I launch, and the first flight of our Minotaur V launch vehicle, which successfully deployed the NASA-built Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer into lunar orbit. Also in 2013, a commercial satellite operator selected a version of our Minotaur rocket to launch a group of imaging satellites.
In 2013, we completed development of our medium-capacity Antares rocket which increases the payload capacity of our space launch vehicles to approximately 14,000 lbs. for launches to low-Earth orbit and lighter payloads into higher orbits. In April 2013, we conducted the first successful test flight of Antares, followed by a second successful flight in September 2013, as part of our Commercial Orbital Transportation Services ("COTS") contract with NASA. Under our Commercial Resupply Services ("CRS") contract with NASA, we expect to perform eight Antares launches through 2016 to deliver cargo to the International Space Station ("ISS"). The first successful CRS mission occurred in January 2014. We are also marketing the Antares vehicle to other U.S. Government and commercial customers.
Interceptor Launch Vehicles - We develop and produce rockets that are used as interceptor launch vehicles for missile defense systems, including interceptor boosters that carry "kill vehicles" designed to defend against ballistic missile attacks. Pursuant to contracts with The Boeing Company ("Boeing"), we are the sole supplier of operational and test interceptor boosters for the U.S. Missile Defense Agency's ("MDA") Ground-based Midcourse Defense ("GMD") program, for which our interceptor boost vehicle, a modified version of our Pegasus rocket, is being used as a major operational element in the U.S. national missile defense system. We conducted two successful launches of our interceptor boost vehicle in 2013. Orbital is currently under contract to provide booster vehicles in support of the GMD program through 2018; additional work was added to our existing contracts with Boeing last year.
Target Launch Vehicles - We design and produce target launch vehicles used in the development and testing of missile defense systems. Our target launch vehicles include suborbital rockets and their principal subsystems, as well as payloads carried by such vehicles. Various branches and agencies of the U.S. military, including MDA, use our target launch vehicles as targets for defense-related applications such as ballistic missile interceptor testing and related experiments. These rockets are programmed to simulate incoming enemy missiles,
offering an affordable and reliable means to test advanced missile defense systems. Our family of target vehicles extends from long-range ballistic target launch vehicles, which include targets for testing MDA's GMD system, to medium- and short-range target vehicles designed to simulate threats to U.S. and allied military forces deployed in overseas theaters. We have also developed a short-range supersonic sea-skimming target ("SSST") that flies just above the ocean's surface and is currently being used by the U.S. Navy. In 2013, we performed ten successful SSST missions. Various government agencies purchased a total of 16 new target vehicles from Orbital last year .
Satellites and Space Systems
Our satellites and space systems segment is involved in developing and producing communications satellites, science and remote sensing satellites, and related subsystems, and we also provide space technical services primarily related to scientific satellite and suborbital research rocket missions.
Communications Satellites - We design and manufacture small- and medium-class geosynchronous-Earth orbit ("GEO") satellites that provide cable and direct-to-home television distribution, business data network connectivity, regional mobile telephony and other space-based communications services. During 2013, we delivered three GEO communications satellites to commercial customers; two were launched and placed into service in 2013, while the third was launched and placed into service in early 2014. We were also selected by three commercial satellite operators for a total of four firm and option satellite orders in 2013.
Science and Remote Sensing Satellites - Our small- and medium-class low-Earth orbit satellites and other spacecraft are used to conduct space-related scientific research, collect imagery and other remotely-sensed data about the Earth, carry out interplanetary and other deep-space exploration missions, and demonstrate new space technologies. Our Landsat-8 observation satellite was successfully launched and placed into service in 2013. We also were selected by NASA in 2013 to build scientific spacecraft for its Ionospheric Connection Explorer mission and Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite mission.
Space Technical Services - We provide advanced space systems and subsystems, including satellite command and data handling, attitude control and structural subsystems and a broad range of space-related technical services, including analytical, engineering and manufacturing services for space-related science and defense programs. We also design, build and integrate a variety of small scientific research rockets and support field operations and launch activities for such vehicles. Twenty of these research rockets were launched in 2013 .
Advanced Space Programs
Our advanced space programs segment is involved in developing and producing human-rated space systems and satellites and related systems primarily used for national security space programs, as well as advanced flight systems for atmospheric and space missions.
Human-Rated Space Systems - We design and manufacture advanced human-rated spacecraft to be used in Earth orbit, planetary exploration and other space missions. In 2008, under the COTS research and development program, we entered into an agreement with NASA to design, build and demonstrate a new space transportation system that has the capability to deliver cargo and other supplies to the ISS. This developmental program was completed in 2013 with the success of our COTS demonstration mission in September 2013, which delivered cargo to the ISS using our Cygnus advanced maneuvering spacecraft that was launched on our Antares launch vehicle. In addition, under our CRS contract with NASA, we expect to perform eight cargo transportation missions to the ISS using the Antares/Cygnus space transportation system. As discussed above, our first CRS mission was successfully completed in February 2014, and we expect to conduct two more CRS missions in 2014.
Advanced Flight Systems - We develop and build advanced flight systems for atmospheric and space missions. We are engaged in a new customer-funded development program to design, build and test a medium-class air-launched rocket and related systems under a contract awarded in 2013. We have developed the operational concept and preliminary design for the air-launched system and are responsible for overall systems engineering, as well as development, production, test and operations of the air-launched rocket and related ground operations.
National Security Space Systems - We develop and produce small- and medium-class satellites and related systems used for a variety of national security space missions and related technology demonstration programs.
Customers
Customers that accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated revenues in 2013 and 2012 were DoD and NASA. Customers that accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated revenues in 2011 were DoD, NASA and Boeing.
Competition
We believe that competition for sales of our products and services is based primarily on performance and technical features, reliability, price, delivery schedule and our ability to customize our products to meet particular customer needs, and we believe that we compete favorably on the basis of these factors. The table below identifies the entities we believe to be our primary competitors for each major product line.
|
Product Line
|
Competitors
|
|
Space launch vehicles
|
United Launch Alliance (a joint venture between
Lockheed Martin Corporation and The Boeing
Company)
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Russian, Indian and Chinese launch vehicles could
represent competition for commercial, as
opposed to U.S. Government, launches
|
|
Interceptor launch vehicles
|
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Raytheon Company
|
|
Target launch vehicles
|
Lockheed Martin Corporation
L-3 Communications, Inc.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Communications satellites
|
Airbus Defense and Space (formerly EADS
Astrium)
The Boeing Company
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Space Systems/Loral, a subsidiary of
MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd.
Reshetnev Company - Information Satellite
Systems
Thales Alenia Space
Mitshubishi Electric Corp.
|
|
Science and remote sensing satellites and national security space systems
|
Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Northrop Grumman Corporation
The Boeing Company
Alliant Techsystems Inc.
Sierra Nevada Corporation
Surrey Satellite Technology Limited, a subsidiary of
Airbus Group
|
|
Space technical services
|
Our space technical services business competes
with many companies, from large defense
contractors to small niche competitors
|
|
Human-rated space systems
|
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
European Space Agency
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
Russian Federal Space Agency
|
Many of our competitors are larger and have substantially greater resources than we do. Furthermore, it is possible that other domestic or foreign companies or governments, some with greater experience in the space and defense industry and many with greater financial resources than we possess, will seek to provide products or services that compete with ours in the future.
Any such foreign competitor could benefit from subsidies from, or other protective measures by, its home country.
Research and Development
We invest in product-related research and development to conceive and develop new products and to enhance existing products. Our research and development expenses totaled approximately $89.2 million, $114.2 million and $102.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We believe our research and development expenses will continue to decline in 2014.
Patents and Proprietary Rights
We rely in part on patents, trade secrets and know-how to develop and maintain our competitive position and technological advantage, particularly with respect to our launch vehicle and satellite products. While our intellectual property rights in the aggregate are important to the operation of our business, we do not believe that any single existing patent or other intellectual property right is of such importance that its loss or termination would have a material adverse effect on our business, taken as a whole.
Components and Raw Materials; Seasonality
We purchase a significant percentage of our subassemblies and instruments from domestic and foreign suppliers. We also obtain from the U.S. Government parts and equipment that are used in the production of our products or in the provision of our services. Generally, we have not experienced material difficulty in obtaining product components or necessary parts and equipment and we believe that alternatives to our existing sources of supply are available in most cases, although we could incur increased costs and possible delays in securing alternative sources of supply.
We rely upon sole-source suppliers for most solid-propellant rocket motors and liquid-propellant rocket engines used on our launch vehicles. For example, our Antares launch vehicle uses liquid-propellant AJ-26 engines, which are modified Russian rocket engines, for its first stage. These engines are only available from one supplier and are no longer in production. While there is sufficient quantity of these engines to complete the remaining seven missions under the CRS program, there is a limited existing supply available for other potential missions. The inability of our current suppliers to provide us with rocket motors and engines, such as the AJ-26, could result in significant contract delays, cost increases and loss of revenues due to the time, resources and effort that would be required to develop or adapt other engines or motors for use in our products.
Our business is not seasonal.
U.S. Government Contracts
During 2013, 2012 and 2011, approximately 83%, 79% and 71%, respectively, of our total annual revenues were derived from contracts with the U.S. Government and its agencies or from subcontracts with other U.S. Government contractors. Most of our U.S. Government contracts are funded incrementally on a year-to-year basis.
Our major contracts with the U.S. Government primarily fall into two categories: cost-reimbursable contracts and fixed-price contracts. Approximately 52% and 48% of our revenues from U.S. Government contracts in 2013 were derived from cost-reimbursable contracts and fixed-price contracts, respectively. Under cost-reimbursable contracts, we recover our actual allowable costs incurred, allocable indirect costs and a fee consisting of (i) a base amount that is fixed at the inception of the contract and/or (ii) an award amount that is based on the customer's evaluation of our performance in terms of the criteria stated in the contract. Our fixed-price contracts include firm fixed-price and fixed-price incentive fee contracts. Under firm fixed-price contracts, work performed and products shipped are priced at a fixed amount without adjustment for actual costs incurred in connection with the contract. Therefore, we bear the risk of loss if costs increase, although some of this risk may be passed on to subcontractors. Fixed-price incentive fee contracts provide for sharing by us and the customer of unexpected costs incurred or savings realized within specified limits, and may provide for adjustments in price depending on actual contract performance other than costs. Costs in excess of the negotiated maximum (ceiling) price and the risk of loss by reason of such excess costs are borne by us, although some of this risk may be passed on to subcontractors.
As noted above, we derive a significant portion of our revenues from U.S. Government contracts, which are dependent on continued political support and federal funding. All our U.S. Government contracts and, in general, our subcontracts with other U.S. Government prime contractors provide that such contracts may be terminated for convenience at any time by the U.S. Government or the prime contractor, respectively. Furthermore, any of these contracts may become subject to a government-issued stop work order under which we would be required to suspend production. In the event of a termination for convenience, contractors generally are entitled to receive the purchase price for delivered items, reimbursement for allowable costs for work in process and an allowance for reasonable profit thereon or adjustment for loss if completion of performance would have resulted in a loss. For a more detailed description of risks relating to the U.S. Government contract industry, see "Item 1A – Risk Factors."
A portion of our business is classified for national security purposes by the U.S. Government and cannot be specifically described. The operating results of these classified programs are included in our consolidated financial statements. The business risks associated with classified programs, as a general matter, do not differ materially from those of our other U.S. Government contracts, and are subject to the same operational, compliance and financial reporting controls.
Regulation
Our ability to pursue our business activities is regulated by various agencies and departments of the U.S. Government and, in certain circumstances, the governments of other countries. Commercial space launches require licenses from the U.S. Department of Transportation ("DoT"), and the operation of our L-1011 aircraft require licenses from certain agencies of the DoT, including the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). The use of the AJ-26 engine, which is a modified Russian rocket engine, on our Antares rocket requires a Russian government license, which we have obtained for our missions currently under contract. The Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") also requires licenses for radio communications during our rocket launches. Our classified programs require that we and certain of our employees maintain appropriate security clearances. We also require export licenses from the U.S. Department of State ("DoS"), the U.S. Department of Commerce ("DoC") and, occasionally, the governments of other countries with respect to transactions we have with foreign customers or foreign subcontractors.
Contract Backlog
Our firm backlog was approximately $2.15 billion at December 31, 2013 and approximately $2.20 billion at December 31, 2012. While there can be no assurance, we expect to convert approximately $990 million of the 2013 year-end firm backlog into revenues during 2014. Our firm backlog as of December 31, 2013 included approximately $1.7 billion of contracts with the U.S. Government and its agencies or from subcontracts with prime contractors of the U.S. Government. Most of our U.S. Government contracts are funded incrementally on a year-to-year basis. Firm backlog from U.S. Government contracts at December 31, 2013 included total funded orders of about $700 million and orders not yet funded of about $970 million. Changes in government policies, priorities or funding levels through agency or program budget reductions by the U.S. Congress or executive agencies could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, contracts with the U.S. Government may be terminated or suspended by the U.S. Government at any time, with or without cause, which could result in a reduction in backlog.
Total backlog was approximately $5.16 billion at December 31, 2013. Total backlog includes firm backlog in addition to unexercised options, indefinite-quantity contracts and undefinitized orders and contract award selections.
Employees
As of February 18, 2014, Orbital had approximately 3,300 employees. Our employees are not subject to collective bargaining agreements. We believe our employee relations are good.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of the executive officers of Orbital as of February 18, 2014. All executive officers are appointed annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
David W. Thompson
|
59
|
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garrett E. Pierce
|
69
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
Officer, Director
|
|
Antonio L. Elias
|
64
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Technical Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald J. Grabe
|
68
|
Executive Vice President and General
Manager, Launch Systems Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael E. Larkin
|
58
|
Executive Vice President and General
Manager, Space Systems Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank L. Culbertson, Jr.
|
64
|
Executive Vice President and General
Manager, Advanced Programs Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom E. McCabe
|
59
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary
|
David W. Thompson is a co-founder of Orbital and has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Orbital since 1982. From 1982 until October 1999, he also served as our President, a role he resumed in 2011. Prior to founding Orbital, Mr. Thompson was employed by Hughes Electronics Corporation as special assistant to the President of its Missile Systems Group and by NASA at the Marshall Space Flight Center as a project manager and engineer, and also worked on the Space Shuttle's autopilot design at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory. Mr. Thompson is an Honorary Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and a Fellow of the American Astronautical Society and the Royal Aeronautical Society, and is a member of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering. He also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the California Institute of Technology.
Garrett E. Pierce has been Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer since April 2002, and was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2000. He has been a director of the Company since August 2000. From 1996 until August 2000, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sensormatic Electronics Corp., a supplier of electronic security systems, where he was also named Chief Administrative Officer in July 1998. Prior to joining Sensormatic, Mr. Pierce was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of California Microwave, Inc., a supplier of microwave, radio frequency and satellite systems and products for communications and wireless networks. From 1980 to 1993, Mr. Pierce was with Materials Research Corporation, a provider of thin film equipment and high purity materials to the semiconductor, telecommunications and media storage industries, where he progressed from Chief Financial Officer to President and Chief Executive Officer. Materials Research Corporation was acquired by Sony Corporation as a wholly owned subsidiary in 1989. From 1972 to 1980, Mr. Pierce held various management positions with The Signal Companies. Mr. Pierce is a director of Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
Antonio L. Elias has been Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer since September 2012. From October 2001 to September 2012, he served as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Advanced Programs Group, and was Senior Vice President and General Manager, Advanced Programs Group since August 1997. From January 1996 until August 1997, Dr. Elias served as Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of Orbital. From May 1993 through December 1995, he was Senior Vice President for Advanced Projects, and was Senior Vice President, Space Systems Division from 1990 to April 1993. He was Vice President, Engineering of Orbital from 1989 to 1990 and was Chief Engineer from 1986 to 1989. From 1980 to 1986, Dr. Elias was an Assistant Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 2001.
Ronald J. Grabe has been Executive Vice President and General Manager, Launch Systems Group since 1999. From 1996 to 1999, he was Senior Vice President and Assistant General Manager of the Launch Systems Group and Senior Vice President of the Launch Systems Group since 1995. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Grabe served as Vice President for Business Development in the Launch Systems Group. From 1980 to 1993, Mr. Grabe was a NASA astronaut during which time he flew four Space Shuttle missions and was lead astronaut for development of the International Space Station.
Michael E. Larkin has been Executive Vice President and General Manager, Space Systems Group since February 2008 and was Senior Vice President and Deputy General Manager of the Space Systems Group since 2006. From 2004 to 2006, he served as Senior Vice President of Finance of the Space Systems Group. From 1996 to 2004, he was Vice President of the Space Systems Group, and was Director of Finance of the Space Systems Group from 1994 to 1996. Prior to that, he held a variety of program and financial management positions at Fairchild Space and Defense Corporation, a space and military electronics company, until its acquisition by Orbital in 1994.
Frank L. Culbertson, Jr. has been Executive Vice President and General Manager, Advanced Programs Group, since September 2012. From 2008 to 2012, he served as Senior Vice President in the Advanced Program Group where he headed our human space systems efforts. Prior to joining Orbital, Mr. Culbertson was a Senior Vice President at Science Applications International Corporation from 2002 to 2008. Before entering the private sector, Mr. Culbertson served as a NASA astronaut for 18 years, flying three Space Shuttle missions, and began his career as a pilot in the United States Navy.
Thomas E. McCabe was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in January 2014. Before joining Orbital, he served from 2010 to 2014 as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Alion Science and Technology Corporation, a provider of advanced engineering and technology solutions. From 2008 to 2010 he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and President of the Federal business, of Braintech, Inc., which provided automated vision systems for industrial and military robots. Earlier in his career, he was Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of XM Satellite Radio from 2005 through its merger with Sirius Satellite Radio in 2008. He also served as President, CEO and a director of software provider MicroBanx Systems from 2001 to 2005, and President, CEO and a director of its parent company, COBIS Corporation, from 2004 to 2005. From 1992 to 2000, he was a senior executive at GRC International, Inc., a provider of advanced software and technology solutions, serving as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Director of Corporate Development through its sale to AT&T in 2000. He was an attorney in private practice from 1982 to 1991. He began his career as judicial clerk for Judge Charles R. Richey at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia from 1981 to 1982.
Available Information
We maintain an Internet website at www.orbital.com. In addition to news and other information about our company, we make available on or through the Investor Relations section of our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file this material with, or furnish it to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
At the Investor Relations section of our website, we have a Corporate Governance page that includes, among other things, copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters for each standing committee of our Board of Directors, including the Audit and Finance Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee.
Printed copies of all of the above-referenced reports and documents may be requested by contacting our Investor Relations Department either by mail at our corporate headquarters, by telephone at (703) 406-5543 or by e-mail at investor.relations@orbital.com. All of the above-referenced reports and documents are available from us free of charge.
* * *
Financial information about our products and services, business segments, domestic and foreign operations and export sales is included in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the notes to our consolidated financial statements, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those related to our financial outlook, liquidity, goals, business strategy, projected plans and objectives of management for future operating results, and forecasts of future events. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often include the words "anticipate," "forecast," "expect," "believe," "should," "will," "intend," "plan" and words of similar substance. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, trends and uncertainties that could cause the actual results or performance of the company to be materially different from the forward-looking statement. Uncertainty surrounding factors such as continued government support and funding for key space and defense programs, new product development programs, the availability of key product components, such as our Antares engines, product performance and market acceptance of products and technologies, achievement of contractual milestones, government contract procurement and termination risks, and income tax rates may materially impact Orbital's actual financial and operational results. We are under no obligation to, and expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or alter any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Investors should carefully consider, among other factors, the risks listed below.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from U.S. Government contracts, which are dependent on continued political support and funding.
The majority of our total annual revenues and our firm backlog at December 31, 2013 were derived from U.S. Government contracts. Most of our U.S. Government contracts are funded incrementally on a year-to-year basis and are subject to uncertain future funding levels. Furthermore, key human space initiatives, missile defense programs, and other space programs must compete with other programs for consideration during the federal budgeting and appropriation process, and support and funding for any U.S. Government program may be influenced by general economic conditions, political considerations and other factors. A decline in U.S. Government support and funding for programs in which we participate could result in contract terminations, delays in contract awards, the failure to exercise contract options, the cancellation of planned procurements and fewer new business opportunities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to a number of domestic and international laws, regulations and restrictions, the non-compliance with which may expose us to adverse consequences.
As a government contractor, we are subject to extensive and complex U.S. Government procurement laws and regulations, including the Procurement Integrity Act and the False Claims Act. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in contract termination, price or fee reductions, civil or criminal penalties, injunctions and/or administrative sanctions such as suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. Government.
In addition, our international business subjects us to numerous U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and regulations relating to import-export control. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in administrative, civil or criminal penalties and administrative sanctions such as suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. Government or suspension of our export privileges, which could result in the termination of existing U.S. Government contracts, affect our ability to win new U.S. Government contracts, and impair our ability to serve foreign customers.
Our business could be adversely affected by adverse audit findings by the U.S. Government.
U.S. Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency and various agency Inspectors General, routinely audit and investigate government contractors. These agencies review a contractor's performance under its contracts, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. Charging practices relating to labor, research and development, and other costs that may be charged directly or indirectly to U.S. Government contracts are often scrutinized to determine that such costs are allowable under U.S. Government contracts and furthermore that such costs are reasonable. Any costs determined to be unallowable or unreasonable may not be reimbursed, and such costs already reimbursed may be subject to repayment. If the amount of such costs were significant, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flow could be materially adversely affected. For example, we expect to recover a significant portion of our research and development expenses through billings under certain of our U.S. Government contracts in accordance with applicable regulations, but such billings could be reversed or rejected by the U.S. Government. Our inability to recover a significant portion of such expenses could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
The above-mentioned agencies also review the adequacy of, and a contractor's compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor's purchasing, property, estimating, compensation, accounting and information systems. Adverse findings relating to our systems could result in the U.S. Government customer withholding a percentage of payments and also could impact our ability to win new U.S. Government contract awards or option exercises.
Responding to government audits, inquiries or investigations may involve significant expense and divert management attention. Also, if an audit or investigation were to uncover improper or illegal activities, we could be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of
payments, fines and suspension or prohibition from doing business with the U.S. Government. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were to be made against us.
Termination of our contracts could materially adversely affect our backlog and our future financial results.
Approximately 83% of our 2013 revenues were derived from direct or indirect contracts with the U.S. Government. All of our direct and indirect contracts with the U.S. Government or its prime contractors may be terminated or suspended at any time, with or without cause, for the convenience of the government. U.S. Government contract awards also may be subject to bid protests, which may result in a contract award being rescinded or subject to reprocurement. In addition, our commercial satellite contracts also give the customer the right to unilaterally terminate the contract. For these reasons, we cannot assure you that all of our backlog will ultimately be recognized in revenues. Termination or suspension of any of our significant U.S. Government contracts or termination of our commercial contracts could result in the loss of future revenues and unreimbursable expenses or charges that could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Furthermore, the termination of any such contracts for default could also have a material adverse effect on our reputation and ability to obtain new business in the future.
We are dependent on a single U.S. Government contract for a large percentage of our revenues and backlog.
Our CRS contract to deliver cargo to the ISS accounted for approximately 24% of our revenues in 2013, and we expect it to continue to account for a material percentage of our revenues in 2014. Given the uncertainty surrounding future government spending and the right of U.S. Government customers to terminate our contracts for convenience, there can be no assurance that the remaining backlog for this contract will ultimately be recognized in revenues. NASA could cancel our CRS contract for any reason, including as a result of reductions in appropriations or our failure to achieve milestones due to technical issues or delays. A cancellation of our CRS contract could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
We use estimates in accounting for our contracts. Changes in our estimates could materially adversely affect our financial results.
Contract accounting requires judgments in assessing risks, estimating contract revenues and costs and making assumptions related to schedule and technical issues. Due to the nature of many of our contracts, the estimation of total revenues and costs at completion may be complex and is subject to many variables. For example, we make assumptions regarding our performance under contracts, the labor hours, labor rates and costs of materials and subcontracts. Our assumptions regarding the timing and amounts of incentives, penalties, award fees and milestones related to performance on contracts involve a high degree of judgment and estimates by our management. These assumptions are important factors that impact the revenues and profits that we recognize. In the event of a change in total estimated contract revenue, cost or
profit, the cumulative effect of such change is recorded in the period the change in estimate occurs.
Because of the significance of the judgments and estimates inherent in our accounting processes described above, it is possible that material adjustments to our financial results could be required if we determine, based on current facts and circumstances known to us, that our prior assumptions are no longer reasonable and need to be revised.
We may not receive full payment for our satellites or launch services and we could incur penalties in the event of a failure or malfunction or if our satellites are not delivered or our rockets are not launched on schedule.
Some of our satellite contracts provide for performance-based payments to be made to us after the satellite is in orbit over periods that may be as long as 15 years. Additionally, some satellite contracts require us to refund a portion of the contract price to the customer if performance criteria, which cover periods of up to 15 years, are not satisfied. Certain contracts include payment milestones that are contingent upon a successful launch. For example, approximately 25% of the contract value of our CRS contract is billable and collectible only upon the completion of launch and delivery milestones for each of eight CRS contract missions. As of December 31, 2013, we have recognized a total of $1.3 billion of revenues on this contract which has a total contract value of approximately $1.9 billion. If we do not successfully complete these launch and delivery milestones, we may be required to record significant revenue and profit reductions.
While our practice is generally to procure insurance policies that we believe would indemnify us for satellite and launch success incentive fees or contract milestones that are not earned and for performance refund obligations, insurance may not be available on economical terms, if at all, for each of our satellite and launch programs. Further, in some cases, we may elect not to procure insurance. In addition, some of our satellite and launch contracts require us to pay penalties in the event that satellites are not delivered or a launch does not occur on a timely basis, or to refund cash receipts to the customer if a contract is terminated for default. Our failure to earn performance-based contract milestones, or a requirement that we refund cash to the customer or pay delay penalties, could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Contract cost overruns could materially adversely impact our financial results.
We provide our products and services primarily through cost-reimbursable and fixed-price contracts. Cost overruns, if significant, could materially adversely impact our financial results:
| ● | Under cost-reimbursable contracts, we are reimbursed for allowable incurred costs plus a fee, which may be fixed or variable (based, entirely or in part, on the customer's evaluation of our performance under the contract). There is no guarantee as to the amount of fee, if any, that we will be awarded under a cost-reimbursable contract with a variable fee. In addition, the price on a cost-reimbursable contract is based on allowable |
| costs incurred, but generally is subject to customer funding limitations. If we incur costs in excess of the amount funded, we may not be able to recover such costs in excess of the amount funded, we may not be able to recover such costs. |
| ● | Under fixed-price contracts, our customers pay us for work performed and products shipped based on an agreed-upon price, without adjustment for any cost overruns. Therefore, we generally bear all of the financial risk as a result of increased costs on these contracts, although some of this risk may be passed on to subcontractors. Some of our fixed-price contracts provide for sharing of unexpected cost increases or savings realized within specified limits and may provide for adjustments in price depending on actual contract performance. We bear the entire risk of cost overruns in excess of the negotiated maximum amount of unexpected costs to be shared. Our commercial contracts are generally fixed-price agreements. In addition, a significant percentage of our revenues from U.S. Government contracts over the last three years was derived from fixed-price agreements, and we believe this trend will continue in future years. |
Our success depends on our ability to penetrate and retain markets for our existing products and to continue to conceive, design, manufacture and market new products on a cost-effective and timely basis.
The development of new or enhanced products and the expansion of existing products into new markets are complex and uncertain strategies that require the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends and can require a significant amount of time and expense to accomplish. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing and other difficulties that could delay or prevent the development, introduction or acceptance of new products and enhancements. In addition, new product development programs often experience schedule delays and cost overruns. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve the technological advances necessary to remain competitive and profitable, that new products will be developed and manufactured on schedule or on a cost-effective basis or that our existing products will not become technologically obsolete. Our failure to predict accurately the needs of our customers and prospective customers and to develop products or product enhancements that address those needs, may result in the loss of current customers or the inability to secure new customers.
We have made a substantial investment in the design, development, production and marketing of the Antares medium-class launch vehicle and the Cygnus advanced maneuvering spacecraft, and we are considering other product enhancements. Future technical issues or launch failures associated with these products could impact the achievement of performance milestones, result in the cancellation of existing contracts or affect our ability to win new business in the medium-class launch services market, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.
Furthermore, as a result of technical issues with the AJ-26 rocket engines and the limited inventory of such engines, which are no longer being manufactured, it is uncertain whether the AJ-26 engine is a viable long-term option for our Antares launch vehicle. While we believe we have an adequate supply of such engines to satisfy our current Antares contracts and a limited number of additional missions, we have been exploring the feasibility of alternative propulsion
systems. Any transition to such an alternative would entail a material investment of time and financial resources. If we are unable to identify a viable alternative propulsion system and modify the Antares launch vehicle in a timely and economical manner, it could limit our long-term ability to compete in the medium-class launch services market.
There can be no assurance that our products will be successfully developed or manufactured or that they will perform as intended.
Most of the products we develop and manufacture are technologically advanced and sometimes include novel systems that must function under highly demanding operating conditions. From time to time, we experience product failures, cost overruns in developing and manufacturing our products, delays in delivery and other operational problems. We have experienced product and service failures, schedule delays and other problems in connection with certain of our launch vehicles, satellites, advanced space systems and other products, and may have similar occurrences in the future. Some of our satellite and launch services contracts impose monetary penalties on us for delays and for performance failures, which penalties could be significant. In addition to any costs resulting from product warranties or required remedial action, product failures or significant delays may result in increased costs or loss of revenues due to the postponement or cancellation of subsequently scheduled operations or product deliveries and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Negative publicity from a product failure could damage our reputation and impair our ability to win new contracts.
We rely on sole source suppliers for a number of key components.
We rely on sole source suppliers for a number of key components, including most of the rocket motors and engines we use on our launch vehicles. If we were unable to obtain such components in the future, due to supplier's financial difficulties or a supplier's failure to perform as expected, we could have difficulty procuring such components in a timely or cost effective manner. A disruption in the procurement of key components could result in substantial cost increases to us, significant delays in the execution of certain contracts or our inability to complete certain contracts, any of which could result in a materially adverse impact on our financial results. Our inability to execute contracts in a timely manner could also result in the termination of our contracts for default and could impair or damage our customer relationships. In addition, negative publicity from any failure of one of our products as a result of a failure by a key supplier could damage our reputation and could limit our ability to win new contracts.
Our international business is subject to risks that may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We sell certain of our communications satellites and other products to non-U.S. customers. We also procure certain key product components from non-U.S. vendors. International contracts are subject to numerous risks, including:
|
·
|
political and economic instability in foreign markets;
|
|
·
|
restrictive trade policies of the U.S. Government and foreign governments;
|
|
·
|
inconsistent product regulation by foreign agencies or governments;
|
|
·
|
the imposition of product tariffs and burdens;
|
|
·
|
the cost of complying with a variety of U.S. and international laws and regulations, including regulations relating to import-export control, and the risk of non-compliance;
|
|
·
|
the complexity and necessity of using non-U.S. representatives and consultants;
|
|
·
|
the inability to obtain required U.S. or foreign country export licenses; and
|
|
·
|
foreign currency exposure.
|
Such risks could have a material adverse effect on our financial results by increasing our costs, causing material delays or subjecting us to penalties.
We operate in a regulated industry, and our inability to secure or maintain the licenses, clearances or approvals necessary to operate our business could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Our ability to pursue our business activities is regulated by various agencies and departments of the U.S. Government and, in certain circumstances, the governments of other countries. Commercial space launches, the reentry of our Cygnus maneuvering spacecraft during CRS operational missions, and operation of our L-1011 aircraft require licenses from certain agencies of the DoT, including the FAA. The use of modified Russian rocket engines on our Antares rocket requires a Russian government license, which we have obtained for our missions currently under contract. The FCC also requires licenses for radio communications during our rocket launches. Our classified programs require that certain of our facilities and certain of our employees maintain appropriate security clearances.
Exports of our products, services and technical information generally require licenses from the DoS or the DoC. In addition, exports of products from our international suppliers may require export licenses from the governments of other countries. We have a number of international customers and suppliers. Our inability to secure or maintain any necessary licenses or approvals or significant delays in obtaining such licenses or approvals could negatively impact our ability to compete successfully in international markets, and could result in an event of default under certain of our international contracts.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our future efforts to secure and maintain necessary licenses, clearances or other U.S. or foreign government regulatory approvals. Our failure to do so could prevent or delay the launch of our rockets or delivery of
our other products, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
We face significant competition in each of our lines of business and many of our competitors possess substantially more resources than we do.
Many of our competitors are larger and have substantially greater resources than we do. Furthermore, it is possible that other domestic or foreign companies or governments, some with greater experience in the space and defense industry and many with greater financial resources than we possess, could seek to produce products or services that compete with our products or services, including new launch vehicles using new technology which could render our launch vehicles less competitively viable. Some of our domestic and foreign competitors currently benefit from, and others may benefit in the future from, subsidies from or other protective measures by their home countries.
Our financial covenants may restrict our operating activities.
Our credit facility contains certain financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, certain coverage ratios, as well as limitations on our ability to incur debt, make dividend payments, make investments, sell all or substantially all of our assets and engage in mergers and consolidations and certain acquisitions. These covenants may restrict our ability to pursue certain business initiatives or certain acquisition transactions. In addition, failure to meet any of the financial covenants in our credit facility could cause an event of default under and/or accelerate some or all of our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
The loss of our executive officers or a failure to retain other key personnel could materially adversely affect our operations.
The departure of any of our executive officers or a failure to retain other key employees could have a material adverse effect on our operations. We require experienced and highly skilled engineers and scientists, and personnel with security clearances to perform our contracts and further our business objectives. The competition and demand for such skilled and experienced employees is great, and there can be no assurance that we will continue to attract and retain key personnel. Our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our operations by hindering our ability to execute our contracts in a timely and satisfactory manner and to obtain new business.
The anticipated benefits of future acquisitions may not be realized.
From time to time we may evaluate potential acquisitions that we believe would enhance our business. Potential acquisitions often require substantial management resources and could have the potential to divert our attention from our existing business. We may not be able to integrate acquired operations without encountering difficulties, including the disruption of our ongoing business. The anticipated benefits of completed business acquisitions may not be fully realized if we are unable to successfully integrate the acquired operations, technologies and personnel into our organization.
We are subject to environmental regulation.
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations relating to the operation of our business, including those governing pollution, the handling, storage, disposal and transportation of hazardous substances and the ownership and operation of real property. Such laws and regulations may result in significant liabilities and costs and the loss of permits required to conduct certain operations. There can be no assurance that a failure to comply with such laws and regulations would not have a material adverse effect on our business in the future.
Our restated certificate of incorporation, our amended and restated bylaws, and Delaware law contain anti-takeover provisions that may adversely affect the rights of our stockholders.
Our charter documents contain provisions which could have an anti-takeover effect, including:
|
·
|
our charter provides for a staggered Board of Directors as a result of which only one of the three classes of directors is elected each year;
|
|
·
|
any merger, acquisition or other business combination that is not approved by our Board of Directors must be approved by 66 2/3% of voting stockholders;
|
|
·
|
stockholders holding less than 10% of our outstanding voting stock cannot call a special meeting of stockholders; and
|
|
·
|
stockholders must give advance notice to nominate directors or submit proposals for consideration at stockholder meetings.
|
In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which restrict the ability of current stockholders holding more than 15% of our voting shares to acquire us without the approval of 66 2/3% of the other stockholders. These provisions could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock. As a result, these provisions may prevent our stock price from increasing substantially in response to actual or rumored takeover attempts. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management.
Not applicable.
Our business operations use approximately 1.6 million square feet of office, engineering and manufacturing space in various locations in the United States, as summarized in the table below.
|
Business Unit
|
Principal Location(s)
|
|
Corporate Headquarters
|
Dulles, Virginia
|
|
Launch Vehicles
|
Chandler, Arizona; Dulles, Virginia; Vandenberg Air Force Base, California; Wallops Island, Virginia; Huntsville, Alabama
|
|
Satellites and Space Systems
|
Dulles, Virginia; Gilbert, Arizona; Greenbelt, Maryland; Wallops Island, Virginia
|
|
Advanced Space Programs
|
Dulles, Virginia; Gilbert, Arizona
|
Approximately 1.3 million square feet of our property, consisting primarily of office space, is leased and 270,000 square feet is owned. Our owned property consists of our two 135,000 square foot state-of-the-art space systems manufacturing facilities that primarily house our satellite manufacturing, assembly and testing activities in Dulles, Virginia and Gilbert, Arizona. Our primary manufacturing facility for our launch vehicles in Chandler, Arizona, consisting of approximately 370,000 square feet, is leased, supplemented by leased and government-owned facilities at Vanderberg Air Force Base, California; Wallop Island, Virginia and Huntsville, Alabama.
We believe that our existing facilities are adequate for our immediate requirements.
From time to time we are party to certain litigation or other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Because of the uncertainties inherent in litigation, we cannot predict whether the outcome of such litigation or other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flow; however, we do not believe that any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.
On June 20, 2013, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against United Launch Alliance, LLC ("ULA") and RD Amross LLC alleging violations of United States antitrust laws as a results of the defendants' exclusivity arrangement with respect to the RD-180 rocket engine and ULA's control of the market for
launch systems and services used for medium-class payload missions. We are seeking damages of at least $515 million, which may be trebled, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On February 18, 2014, there were 2,235 Orbital common stockholders of record.
Our common stock trades on The New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol ORB. The range of high and low sales prices of Orbital common stock, as reported on the NYSE, was as follows:
|
2013
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
|
4th Quarter
|
$
|
24.16
|
$
|
20.65
|
||||
|
3rd Quarter
|
21.72
|
17.26
|
||||||
|
2nd Quarter
|
18.76
|
15.71
|
||||||
|
1st Quarter
|
16.89
|
13.97
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
|
4th Quarter
|
$
|
15.18
|
$
|
11.90
|
||||
|
3rd Quarter
|
15.12
|
12.26
|
||||||
|
2nd Quarter
|
13.50
|
10.59
|
||||||
|
1st Quarter
|
15.23
|
12.96
|
||||||
We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock, nor do we anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. Moreover, our credit facility contains covenants limiting our ability to pay cash dividends. For a discussion of these limitations, see "Item 7 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources."
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2013. We did not issue any equity securities on an unregistered basis during 2013.
The following graph compares the yearly cumulative total return on the company's common stock against the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 Index and the Dow-Jones Aerospace/Defense Index for the five-year period commencing on December 31, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013.
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The selected consolidated financial data presented below for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
1,365,271
|
$
|
1,436,769
|
$
|
1,345,923
|
$
|
1,294,577
|
$
|
1,125,295
|
||||||||||
|
Cost of revenues
|
1,062,466
|
1,097,190
|
1,074,389
|
1,007,668
|
890,313
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses
|
189,260
|
227,008
|
191,740
|
213,895
|
182,689
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
113,545
|
112,571
|
79,794
|
73,014
|
52,293
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Interest income and other, net
|
(5,368
|
)(1)
|
749
|
19,335
|
1,848
|
7,130
|
||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(4,556
|
)
|
(11,275
|
)
|
(11,096
|
)
|
(9,778
|
)
|
(9,039
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Debt extinguishment expense
|
—
|
(10,261
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
|
Income before taxes
|
103,621
|
91,784
|
88,033
|
65,084
|
48,222
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income tax provision
|
(35,255
|
)
|
(30,778
|
)
|
(20,639
|
)
|
(17,615
|
)
|
(11,615
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
68,336
|
$
|
61,006
|
$
|
67,394
|
$
|
47,469
|
$
|
36,607
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic income per share
|
$
|
1.13
|
$
|
1.03
|
$
|
1.14
|
$
|
0.81
|
$
|
0.64
|
||||||||||
|
Diluted income per share
|
$
|
1.13
|
$
|
1.02
|
$
|
1.13
|
$
|
0.81
|
$
|
0.63
|
||||||||||
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
|
60,161
|
59,165
|
58,531
|
57,683
|
56,787
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
60,444
|
59,457
|
59,127
|
58,335
|
57,496
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash flow from operating activities
|
$
|
52,615
|
$
|
(7,666
|
)
|
$
|
65,136
|
$
|
(479
|
)
|
$
|
102,783
|
||||||||
|
Cash flow from investing activities
|
(18,819
|
)
|
(26,586
|
)
|
(59,815
|
)
|
(134,452
|
)
|
(44,105
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Cash flow from financing activities
|
(283
|
)
|
7,357
|
1,483
|
14,360
|
(13,999
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
265,837
|
$
|
232,324
|
$
|
259,219
|
$
|
252,415
|
$
|
372,986
|
||||||||||
|
Net working capital
|
639,956
|
522,112
|
416,050
|
316,617
|
364,429
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
1,284,761
|
1,211,454
|
1,130,800
|
1,062,536
|
929,481
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Long-term obligations, net
|
135,000
|
143,236
|
131,182
|
125,535
|
120,274
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders' equity
|
795,301
|
713,546
|
643,279
|
568,617
|
502,460
|
|||||||||||||||
_________________________________________________
(1) In 2013, the company recorded a $10.0 million pretax charge ($6.1 million after tax) to write off a non-current asset and a $3.7 million gain (pretax and after tax) on the sale of investments.
With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed within this Item 7 and elsewhere in this Form 10-K include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Readers should be cautioned that a number of important factors, including those identified above in "Item 1 – Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" and "Item 1A – Risk Factors," may affect actual results and may cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or expected in any forward-looking statement. Our historical results of operations may not be indicative of our future operating results.
Overview
Introduction
Orbital Sciences Corporation develops and manufactures small- and medium-class rockets and space systems for commercial, military and civil government customers. Our primary products and services include the following:
| ● | Launch Vehicles - Rockets that are used as small- and medium-class space launch vehicles that place satellites into Earth orbit and escape trajectories, interceptor and target vehicles for missile defense systems and suborbital launch vehicles that place payloads into a variety of high-altitude trajectories. |
| ● | Satellites and Space Systems - Small- and medium-class satellites that are used to enable global and regional communications and broadcasting, conduct space-related scientific research, collect imagery and other remotely-sensed data about the Earth, carry out interplanetary and other deep-space exploration missions, and demonstrate new space technologies. |
| ● | Advanced Space Programs - Human-rated space systems for Earth-orbit and deep-space exploration, and small- and medium-class satellites used for national security space programs and to demonstrate new space technologies, and advanced flight systems for atmospheric and space missions. |
Our general strategy is to develop and expand a core integrated set of space and launch system technologies and products, focusing on the design and manufacture of affordable rockets, satellites and other space systems in order to establish and expand positions in niche markets that have not typically been emphasized by our larger competitors. Another part of our strategy is to seek customer contracts that will fund new product development and enhancements to our existing launch vehicle and space systems product lines. As a result of our capabilities and experience in designing, developing, manufacturing and operating a broad range of small- and medium-class rockets and space systems, we believe we are well positioned to capitalize on the demand for more affordable space-technology systems in commercial satellite communications,
space-based military and intelligence operations and military defense programs, and to take advantage of government-sponsored initiatives in human space exploration, space-based scientific research and interplanetary exploration.
Business and Industry Considerations
U.S. Government Business - During 2013, 2012 and 2011, approximately 83%, 79% and 71%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues were derived from contracts with the U.S. Government and its agencies or from subcontracts with other U.S. Government contractors. Most of our U.S. Government contracts are funded incrementally on a year-to-year basis. As a result, our operations and our financial results in any period could be impacted substantially by trends in U.S. Government spending, shifting priorities in DoD (including the U.S. Air Force, Navy and MDA), NASA and other agency budgets, the types of contracts and payment terms mandated by the U.S. Government and changes in the Executive Branch and Congress. These factors, which are largely beyond our control, could have a significant impact on our business.
In January 2014, Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act for 2014 (the "Appropriations Act") which funds U.S. Government spending for the remainder of Government Fiscal Year ("GFY") 2014. Although the Appropriations Act calls for a modest increase in the federal budget and scales back the impact of sequestration, we believe the focus of Congress on reducing the federal deficit could continue to affect the existing and future programs of our primary U.S. Government customers in the near term.
Under the Appropriations Act, NASA is funded at approximately $18 billion for GFY 2014, in line with the President's request and similar to funding levels over the last two years. Importantly, NASA continues to prioritize funding for the continuation of U.S. commercial cargo services for the ISS, and the Obama Administration recently announced a plan to extend the ISS operations from 2020 until 2024. Accordingly, we believe that funding for our CRS contract currently remains unaffected by fiscal tightening. NASA's science program accounts are presently funded at approximately $5 billion, a slight increase over the President's request, and we believe there is adequate funding to accommodate Orbital's main science satellite programs currently under contract.
Funding under the Appropriations Act for DoD and its agencies, like MDA, are similarly flat for GFY 2014. The majority of our missile defense interceptor and target launch vehicle revenues comes from programs sponsored by MDA. We expect federal spending on space and missile defense programs to continue to be lower compared to historic levels over the next couple of years. While such continued budget constraints may contribute to the delay or reduction in scope of future space and missile defense programs, appropriations for the GMD program are marginally higher in GFY 2014, and we do not believe it will be materially affected this year.
In 2013, federal budget constraints negatively impacted national security space programs resulting in program delays, cancellations and scope reductions and may continue to do so in the near term. Although DoD and the intelligence community have been considering ways to address their operational requirements on more limited budgets over the last several years by
considering smaller and more affordable space systems that we believe are within our addressable market, we have seen limited progress in this area recently. It is therefore difficult to anticipate what effect budget constraints in this area will have on our business prospects and financial performance and whether we might achieve any tangible competitive advantages in the near term.
Commercial Satellites Business - Our largest commercial business is the design and manufacture of small- and medium-class GEO communications satellites. The commercial communications satellite market is driven by economic conditions that may affect satellite operators directly as well as their satellite replacement requirements. In 2013, the total number of commercial GEO satellite orders was higher than the number ordered in each of the prior three years, but still below the peak of four years ago. We expect capital spending and new commercial GEO satellite orders in 2014 from communications satellite operators to be similar to 2013.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain. Such judgments affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management continuously evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to long-term contracts and incentives, inventories, long-lived assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation, and the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and such differences may be material.
The following is a summary of the most critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition - Our revenues are derived primarily from long-term contracts. Revenues on long-term contracts are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Such revenues are recorded based on the percentage that costs incurred to date bear to the most recent estimates of total costs to complete each contract. Estimating future revenues, costs and profit is a process requiring a high degree of management judgment, including management's assumptions regarding our future operational performance as well as general economic conditions. In the event of a change in total estimated contract revenue, cost or profit, the cumulative effect of such change is recorded in the period the change in estimate occurs. Aggregate net changes in contract estimates recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting increased operating income by $59 million and $61 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, and decreased operating income by $1 million in 2011. The adjustments in 2013 and 2012 were primarily attributable to improved operating results during the latter stages of completion of communications satellite contracts. Frequently, the period of performance of a contract extends over a long period of time and, as such, revenue recognition and our profitability from a particular contract may be affected to the extent that estimated
costs to complete or incentive or award fee estimates are revised, delivery schedules are delayed, performance-based milestones are not achieved or progress under a contract is otherwise impeded. Accordingly, our recorded revenues and operating profit from period to period can fluctuate significantly. In the event cost estimates indicate a loss on a contract, the total amount of such loss, excluding general and administrative expense, is recorded in the period in which the loss is first estimated.
Many of our contracts include provisions that increase or decrease contract value based on performance in relation to established targets or customer evaluations. Mission success milestones and incentive and award fees are included in estimated contract revenue when we are able to make reasonable predictions about whether the performance targets will be achieved and make dependable estimates of such amounts based upon our historical experience with similar types of activities and other objective criteria. We include the estimated amount of mission success milestones and incentive and award fees in estimated contract revenue at the inception of each contract, with reassessments made each quarter throughout the period of contract performance. If performance under such contracts were to differ from previous assumptions, or if we were to revise our estimates or assumptions, current period revenues and profit would be adjusted and could fluctuate significantly. Our assessments are guided by the historical performance of our products and product families, the reliability record of the technology employed and assessments of technological considerations for each contract.
As part of our risk management strategy, we generally insure significant mission success milestone receipts. Insurance recoveries are recorded as other income in the consolidated financial statements.
Mission success milestones relating to the launch of our Antares rocket with its Cygnus payload and the successful delivery of cargo to the ISS comprise approximately 25% of total CRS contract value. If we do not achieve these mission success milestones, we may be required to record revenue and profit reductions. Since the inception of the CRS contract in December 2008 through December 31, 2013, we have recognized $1.3 billion of revenues on the contract, which has a total contract value of approximately $1.9 billion.
As of December 31, 2013, unbilled receivables included approximately $10 million of incentive fees on certain completed satellite contracts that become due incrementally over periods of up to 15 years, subject to the achievement of performance criteria.
Certain satellite contracts require the company to refund a portion of the contract price to the customer if performance criteria, which cover periods of up to 15 years, are not satisfied. As of December 31, 2013, we could be required to refund up to approximately $17 million to customers if certain completed satellites were to fail to satisfy performance criteria. We generally procure insurance policies under which we believe we would recover satellite incentive fees that are not earned and potential performance refund obligations.
Research and Development - Expenditures for company-sponsored research and development projects are expensed as incurred. Research and development projects performed under contracts for customers are recorded as contract costs.
Income Taxes - We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. We also recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not that a tax position will not be sustained upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. If a tax position does not meet the "more-likely-than-not" recognition threshold, despite our belief that our filing position is supportable, the benefit of that tax position is not recognized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a tax rate change on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We record valuation allowances to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount considered more likely than not to be realized. Changes in estimates of future taxable income can materially change the amount of such valuation allowances.
Consolidated Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 201 and 2010
Revenues - Our consolidated revenues were $1,365.3 million in 2013, a decrease of $71.5 million, or 5%, compared to 2012 due to lower revenues in the satellites and space systems segment and the advanced space programs segment, partially offset by higher revenues in the launch vehicles segment. Satellites and space systems segment revenues decreased $108.6 million, or 22%, in 2013 primarily due to lower activity on communications satellite contracts that were completed or substantially completed in late 2012 and early 2013. Advanced space programs segment revenues decreased $0.7 million in 2013 primarily due to decreased activity on the CRS contract and national security satellite contracts, largely offset by activity on a new commercial contract awarded in 2013. Launch vehicles segment revenues increased $24.4 million, or 5%, in 2013 primarily due to increased activity on missile defense interceptors, partially offset by decreased activity on space launch vehicle and target launch vehicle contracts.
Eliminations of intersegment revenues totaled $43.3 million and $56.8 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Intersegment revenues included $31.9 million and $47.6 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, pertaining to Antares space launch vehicle production work reported as revenues in our launch vehicles segment and as costs in our advanced space programs segment as part of the COTS program. Antares production work on the COTS program decreased significantly in 2013 as the COTS program was completed in the later part of the year.
The CRS contract accounted for 24% of consolidated revenues in 2013 and 2012. The launch vehicle portion of the CRS contract is reported in our launch vehicles segment and the spacecraft portion of the CRS contract is reported in our advanced space programs segment. CRS contract revenues totaled $332.5 million in 2013, a decrease of $13.4 million, or 4%, compared to 2012. Since the inception of the CRS contract through December 31, 2013, a total of $1.3 billion of revenues have been recognized on the contract, which has a total contract value of approximately $1.9 billion.
Our consolidated revenues were $1,436.8 million in 2012, an increase of $90.8 million, or 7%, compared to 2011 due to higher revenues in the launch vehicles segment and advanced space programs segment, partially offset by lower revenues in the satellites and space systems segment. Launch vehicles segment revenues increased $44.1 million, or 9%, in 2012 primarily due to increased activity on target launch vehicle contracts, partially offset by decreased activity on missile defense interceptors and lower space launch vehicle revenues. In addition, 2011 revenues in the launch vehicles segment were reduced by an $11.3 million adjustment as a result of a Taurus launch failure in March 2011. Advanced space programs segment revenues increased $36.1 million, or 8%, in 2012 primarily due to increased activity on the CRS contract partially offset by decreased activity on national security satellite contracts. Satellites and space systems segment revenues decreased $57.6 million, or 10%, in 2012 due to lower activity on communications satellite contracts that were completed or substantially completed in 2012, partially offset by higher activity on space technical services contracts and science and remote sensing satellite contracts.
Eliminations of intersegment revenues totaled $56.8 million and $125.1 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Intersegment revenues included $47.6 million and $114.4 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, pertaining to Antares launch vehicle production work reported as revenues in our launch vehicles segment and as costs in our advanced space programs segment as part of the COTS program. Antares production work on the COTS program decreased significantly in 2012 as compared to 2011.
Cost of Revenues - Our cost of revenues was $1,062.5 million in 2013, a decrease of $34.7 million, or 3%, compared to 2012. Cost of revenues includes the cost of personnel, materials, subcontractors and overhead. Cost of revenues in the satellites and space systems segment decreased $93.7 million, or 24%, primarily due to decreased contract activity on communications satellite contracts. Cost of revenues in the launch vehicles segment increased $38.8 million, or 9%, largely due to increased activity in missile defense interceptors. Cost of revenues in the advanced space programs segment increased $6.8 million, or 2%. Eliminations of intersegment cost of revenues decreased $13.4 million in 2013 attributable to the reduction in intersegment revenues discussed above.
Our cost of revenues was $1,097.2 million in 2012, an increase of $22.8 million, or 2%, compared to 2011. Cost of revenues in the advanced space programs segment increased $27.4 million, or 8%, primarily due to higher contract costs on the CRS program. Cost of revenues in the launch vehicles segment increased $6.6 million, or 2%, which was lower than the revenue increase in this segment largely due to the effect of the 2011 revenue reduction resulting from the March 2011 launch failure mentioned above. Cost of revenues in the satellites and space systems segment decreased $79.5 million, or 17%, primarily due to lower production activity and reduced materials and subcontract costs on communications satellite contracts. Eliminations of intersegment cost of revenues decreased $68.3 million in 2012 attributable to the reduction in intersegment revenues discussed above.
Research and Development Expenses - Our research and development expenses totaled $89.2 million, or 7% of revenues, in 2013, a decrease of $25.0 million, or 22%, compared to 2012. The decrease in research and development expenses was principally attributable to lower costs
on the Antares launch vehicle development program, partially offset by higher COTS program costs. The COTS program was completed in the second half of 2013.
Our research and development expenses totaled $114.2 million, or 8% of revenues, in 2012, an $11.4 million, or 11%, increase compared to $102.8 million, or 8% of revenues, in 2011. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to product enhancements in the satellites and space systems segment and increased costs on the Antares launch vehicle development program, partially offset by lower COTS program costs.
The COTS program was accounted for as a best-efforts research and development cost-sharing arrangement. As such, the amounts funded by NASA were recognized proportionally as an offset to the company's COTS program research and development expenses, including associated general and administrative expenses. The following table summarizes the COTS program costs incurred and amounts funded by NASA recorded in research and development expenses through its completion in 2013 (in millions):
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
Inception to December 31, 2013
|
||||||||||||
|
Research and development costs incurred (1)
|
$
|
49.9
|
$
|
62.6
|
$
|
158.8
|
$
|
530.4
|
||||||||
|
Less amounts funded by NASA
|
(5.8
|
)
|
(21.9
|
)
|
(108.0
|
)
|
(288.0
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net research and development expenses
|
$
|
44.1
|
$
|
40.7
|
$
|
50.8
|
$
|
242.4
|
||||||||
_______________________
(1) Includes associated general and administrative expenses.
Research and development expenses attributable to our Antares launch vehicle development program were $15.8 million, $42.6 million and $34.3 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
We believe that a majority of our research and development expenses are recoverable and billable under contracts with the U.S. Government, from which the majority of our revenues are derived. Charging practices relating to research and development and other costs that may be charged directly or indirectly to government contracts are subject to audit by U.S. Government agencies to determine if such costs are reasonable and allowable under government contracting regulations and accounting practices. We believe that research and development costs incurred in connection with our Antares development program are allowable, although the U.S. Government has not yet made a final determination with respect to approximately $177 million of such costs incurred through 2013. If such costs were determined to be unallowable, we could be required to record revenue and profit reductions in future periods.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses - Selling, general and administrative expenses were $100.0 million, $112.8 million and $89.0 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, or 7%, 8% and 7% of revenues, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses include the cost of our finance, legal, administrative and general management functions, as well as bid, proposal and marketing costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $12.8 million, or 11%, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a reduction in bid, proposal and marketing costs pertaining to new business pursuits in the advanced space programs segment. In addition, selling, general and
administrative expenses in 2012 included $2.1 million of professional fees and other costs related to a potential acquisition that was not consummated.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $23.8 million, or 27%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to an increase in bid, proposal and marketing costs pertaining to new business pursuits in the advanced space programs segment and launch vehicles segment, and due to an increase in certain corporate-level professional fees and expenses.
Operating Income - Our consolidated operating income was $113.5 million in 2013, an increase of $1.0 million, or 1%, compared to 2012 due to higher operating income in the launch vehicles segment, partially offset by lower operating income in the satellites and space systems segment and the advanced space programs segment. Launch vehicles segment operating income increased $12.7 million, or 35%, largely due to increased activity on missile defense interceptors and profit improvements on certain space launch vehicle and target launch vehicle contracts. Satellites and space systems segment operating income decreased $12.3 million, or 27%, primarily due to lower operating income from communications satellite contracts. Advanced space programs segment operating income decreased $1.5 million, or 5%, primarily due to decreased activity on national security satellite contracts. Operating income in 2012 was reduced by $2.1 million of unallocated professional fees and other costs, recorded in corporate and other, related to a potential acquisition that was not consummated.
Total operating income from the CRS contract was $23.3 million in 2013, an increase of $6.6 million compared to 2012. Since the inception of the CRS program through December 31, 2013, a total of $71 million of operating income has been recognized on the program.
Our consolidated operating income was $112.6 million in 2012, an increase of $32.8 million, or 41%, compared to 2011 due to higher operating income in all three operating business segments. Launch vehicles segment operating income increased $22.0 million, or 155%, largely due to an adjustment that reduced 2011 operating income by $11.3 million in connection with the March 2011 rocket launch failure mentioned above and increased operating income from the CRS and target launch vehicle contracts. Satellites and space systems segment operating income increased $8.6 million, or 23%, primarily due to profit improvements on certain communications satellite contracts that were substantially completed in 2012 and a $6.5 million contract settlement charge that reduced operating income in 2011. Advanced space programs segment operating income increased $4.3 million, or 15%, primarily due to a favorable contract closeout adjustment in 2012 in addition to increased activity on the CRS contract, partially offset by decreased activity on national security satellite contracts. Operating income in 2012 was reduced by $2.1 million of unallocated professional fees and other costs, as discussed above.
Interest Income and Other, Net - Interest income and other, net was a net expense of $5.4 million in 2013 and income of $0.7 million and $19.3 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest income and other, net in 2013 included a $10 million charge to write off an option payment pertaining to a business agreement that was terminated in the fourth quarter of 2013 in connection with the conclusion of litigation. In addition, we recorded a $3.7 million gain from the sale of investments in 2013. In 2013, 2012 and 2011, we earned interest income of $1.2 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively, on short-term invested cash balances. In
2011 we recorded $17.8 million of insurance recoveries comprised of $11.3 million pertaining to the March 2011 Taurus launch failure and the $6.5 million contract settlement charge discussed above.
Interest Expense - Interest expense was $4.6 million, $11.3 million and $11.1 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The reduction in interest expense in 2013 was attributable to the refinancing of our debt in December 2012.
Debt Extinguishment Expense - During 2012, we recorded $10.3 million of debt extinguishment expenses pertaining to the refinancing of our debt in December 2012. The debt extinguishment expenses consisted of $6.8 million of accelerated amortization of debt discount, $2.8 million in prepayment of premiums and other expenses, and $0.7 million in accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs.
Income Tax Provision - Our income tax provision was $35.3 million, $30.8 million and $20.6 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective tax rate for 2013, 2012 and 2011 was 34%, 34% and 23%, respectively. We recorded favorable income tax adjustments of $1.1 million, $2.8 million and $7.7 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, pertaining to extraterritorial income exclusions. In addition, our income tax provision in 2011 included federal research and development tax credits of $5.1 million.
Our cash payments for income taxes totaled approximately 11%, 3% and 3% of pretax income in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our cash income tax rates were significantly lower than our income tax provision discussed above because we utilized net operating loss carryforwards to largely offset taxable income in each of 2013, 2012 and 2011. As of December 31, 2013, we had utilized substantially all net operating loss carryforwards; however, we have research and development tax credit carryforwards that are expected to partially reduce our cash income tax payments in 2014.
Net Income - Net income was $68.4 million, $61.0 million and $67.4 million, or $1.13, $1.02 and $1.13 diluted earnings per share, in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Segment Results
Our products and services are grouped into three reportable segments: launch vehicles, satellites and space systems and advanced space programs. Corporate office transactions that have not been attributed to a particular segment, as well as consolidating eliminations and adjustments, are reported in corporate and other.
The following tables of financial information and related discussion of the results of operations of our business segments are consistent with the presentation of segment information in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.
Launch Vehicles
Launch vehicles segment operating results were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
% Change
|
2012
|
2011
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
551,709
|
$
|
527,287
|
5
|
%
|
$
|
527,287
|
$
|
483,177
|
9
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating income
|
48,831
|
36,131
|
35
|
%
|
36,131
|
14,147
|
155
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Operating margin
|
8.9
|
%
|
6.9
|
%
|
6.9
|
%
|
2.9
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Segment Revenues - Launch vehicles segment revenues increased $24.4 million, or 5%, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to increased activity on missile defense interceptors, partially offset by decreased activity on space launch vehicle and target launch vehicle contracts. Missile defense interceptor revenues increased $65.0 million, or 83%, primarily due to increased activity on the Ground-based Midcourse Defense ("GMD") contract. Under the GMD program, we supply interceptor boosters for the U.S. Missile Defense Agency's GMD system. GMD program revenues accounted for 26% and 15% of total launch vehicles segment revenues in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Space launch vehicle revenues decreased $25.9 million, or 11%, primarily due to decreased activity on Minotaur and Pegasus launch vehicles in addition to lower Antares launch vehicle revenues. Antares revenues were $184.4 million and $190.6 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, reflecting a decrease in production work on Antares launch vehicles for the COTS program that was completed in 2013, partially offset by increased Antares activity for the CRS contract. Antares revenues were $152.5 million and $143.0 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, for the CRS contract and $31.9 million and $47.6 million, respectively, for the COTS program. Antares launch vehicle revenues accounted for 33% and 36% of total launch vehicles segment revenues in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Target launch vehicle revenues decreased $18.4 million, or 9%, mainly due to the completion of a contract in 2013.
Launch vehicles segment revenues increased $44.1 million, or 9%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to increased activity on target launch vehicle contracts, partially offset by decreased activity on missile defense interceptors and space launch vehicle contracts. Target launch vehicle revenues increased $60.2 million, or 43%, primarily due to activity on certain contracts awarded in 2011. Missile defense interceptor revenues decreased $9.7 million, or 11%, primarily due to decreased activity on the GMD contract. Missile defense interceptor revenues accounted for 15% and 18% of total launch vehicles segment revenues in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Space launch vehicle revenues decreased $5.2 million, or 2%, primarily due to decreased production work on Antares launch vehicles combined with lower Taurus and Pegasus revenues, partially offset by increased activity on Minotaur launch vehicles. In addition, 2011 revenues were reduced by an $11.3 million adjustment as a result of a 2011 Taurus launch failure. Antares launch vehicle revenues were $190.6 million and $199.7 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, reflecting a decrease in Antares activity for the COTS program that was largely offset by increased Antares activity for the CRS contract. Antares revenues were $143.0 million and $85.3 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, for the CRS contract and $47.6 million and $114.4 million, respectively, for the COTS program. Antares launch vehicle revenues accounted for 36% and 41% of total launch vehicles segment revenues in 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Segment Operating Income - Operating income in the launch vehicles segment increased $12.7 million, or 35%, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to increased activity on missile defense interceptors and profit improvements on certain space launch vehicle and target launch vehicle contracts. Operating income from missile defense interceptor launch vehicles increased $5.8 million, or 74%, principally due to increased activity on the GMD contract. Operating income from space launch vehicle contracts increased $5.8 million, or 64%, primarily due to a profit margin improvement in connection with the successful launch of a Pegasus launch vehicle in 2013. Operating income from Antares space launch vehicles for the CRS program increased to $10.3 million in 2013 from $6.7 million in 2012 largely due to a profit margin improvement following favorable performance on the COTS and CRS-1 missions. Operating income from target launch vehicle contracts increased $1.3 million, or 7%, mainly due to a profit margin improvement in 2013 on the Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile ("IRBM") contract.
Operating income in the launch vehicles segment increased $22.0 million, or 155%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to higher space launch vehicle and target launch vehicle operating income partially offset by decreased operating income from interceptor launch vehicles. Operating income from space launch vehicle contracts increased $18.6 million, or 194%, primarily due to an adjustment that reduced 2011 operating income by $11.3 million in connection with the 2011 launch failure discussed above and increased Antares operating income in 2012. Operating income from Antares space launch vehicle production work for the CRS contract was $6.7 million and $4.4 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Operating income from target launch vehicle contracts increased $6.4 million, or 50%, primarily due to activity from certain contracts awarded in 2011. Operating income from interceptor launch vehicles decreased $3.9 million, or 33%, primarily due to decreased activity on the GMD contract.
Launch vehicles segment operating margins (as a percentage of revenues) were 8.9%, 6.9% and 2.9% in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in operating margin in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to the space launch and target launch vehicle profit margin improvements discussed above. The increase in operating margin in 2012 as compared to 2011 was largely due to the adjustment pertaining to the 2011 launch failure discussed above.
Satellites and Space Systems
Satellites and space systems segment operating results were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
% Change
|
2012
|
2011
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
387,505
|
$
|
496,152
|
(22
|
%)
|
$
|
496,152
|
$
|
553,797
|
(10
|
%)
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating income
|
33,938
|
46,222
|
(27
|
%)
|
46,222
|
37,623
|
23
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Operating margin
|
8.8
|
%
|
9.3
|
%
|
9.3
|
%
|
6.8
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Segment Revenues - Satellites and space systems segment revenues decreased $108.6 million, or 22%, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to lower activity on communications satellite contracts, partially offset by higher activity on science and remote sensing satellite contracts and space technical services contracts. Communications satellite revenues decreased $124.1 million, or 42%, principally due to the completion of several satellites in late 2012 and early 2013. Communications satellite contract revenues accounted for 45% and 60%, respectively, of total segment revenues in 2013 and 2012. Revenues from science and remote sensing satellite contracts increased $13.5 million, or 15%, mainly due to a substantial increase in activity on a science satellite contract in 2013. Space technical services revenues increased $3.2 million, or 3%.
Satellites and space systems segment revenues decreased $57.6 million, or 10%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to lower activity on communications satellite contracts, partially offset by higher activity on space technical services contracts and science and remote sensing satellite contracts. Communications satellite revenues decreased $73.5 million, or 20%, principally attributable to a reduction in activity on contracts that were completed or nearing completion in 2012. Communications satellite contract revenues accounted for 60% and 67%, respectively, of total segment revenues in 2012 and 2011. Space technical services revenues increased $9.9 million, or 11%, primarily due to increased contract activity. Revenues from science and remote sensing satellite contracts increased $6.0 million, or 7%, primarily due to activity on a contract that was awarded in 2011, partially offset by lower revenues on contracts that were completed or nearing completion.
Segment Operating Income - Operating income in the satellites and space systems segment decreased $12.3 million, or 27%, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to lower operating income from communications satellite contracts. Communications satellite contracts operating income decreased $10.6 million, or 32%, mainly due to decreased activity on communications satellite contracts. Communications satellite operating income in both 2013 and 2012 included profit improvements in connection with the successful completion of certain satellite contracts. Communications satellite operating income accounted for 67% and 72% of total segment operating income in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Science and remote sensing satellite operating income decreased $1.5 million, or 18%, despite the increase in revenues, principally due to cost increases on a satellite contract awarded in 2011. Space technical services operating income decreased $0.2 million.
Operating income in the satellites and space systems segment increased $8.6 million, or 23%, in 2012 compared to 2011 due to higher operating income on communications satellite contracts. Communications satellite contracts operating income increased $8.5 million, or 34%, despite lower communications satellite revenues primarily due to profit improvements on certain communications satellite contracts that were substantially completed in 2012 and a $6.5 million contract settlement charge that reduced operating income in 2011. Communications satellite operating income accounted for 72% and 64% of total segment operating income in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Science and remote sensing satellite operating income decreased $1.2 million, or 13%. Space technical services operating income increased marginally due to an increase in contract activity and related revenues.
Satellites and space systems segment operating margins (as a percentage of revenues) were 8.8%, 9.3% and 6.8% in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Operating margin decreased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a lower science and remote sensing satellite operating margin, partially offset by an increase in the communications satellite operating margin. The lower science and remote sensing satellite operating margin was principally due to the cost increases on a satellite contract discussed above. The communications satellite operating margin was approximately 13%, 11% and 7% in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Communications satellite operating margin in both 2013 and 2012 included profit margin improvements in connection with the successful completion of certain satellite contracts; however, we expect that communications satellite profit margins will be in the mid-single digit percentages in 2014. The overall segment operating margin in 2011 reflected the $6.5 million reduction to operating income from the contract settlement discussed above.
Advanced Space Programs
Advanced space programs segment operating results were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
% Change
|
2012
|
2011
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
469,400
|
$
|
470,102
|
NM
|
$
|
470,102
|
$
|
434,036
|
8
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
|
Operating income
|
30,776
|
32,309
|
(5
|
%)
|
32,309
|
28,024
|
15
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Operating margin
|
6.6
|
%
|
6.9
|
%
|
6.9
|
%
|
6.5
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Segment Revenues - Advanced space programs segment revenues decreased $0.7 million in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to decreased activity on the CRS contract and national security satellite contracts, substantially offset by activity on a new commercial contract awarded in 2013. CRS contract revenues decreased $22.9 million, or 11%, and national security satellite contract revenues decreased $21.8 million, or 9%. The CRS contract accounted for 38% and 43%, of total segment revenues in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Advanced space programs segment revenues increased $36.1 million, or 8%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to increased activity on the CRS contract, partially offset by decreased activity on national security satellites. CRS contract revenues increased $40.9 million, or 25%, partially offset by lower national security satellite revenues of $8.6 million, or 3%. In
2012, national security satellite contracts and the CRS contract accounted for 54% and 43%, respectively, of total segment revenues, compared to 61% and 37%, respectively, in 2011.
Segment Operating Income - Operating income in the advanced space programs segment decreased $1.5 million, or 5%, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to decreased activity and lower profit margins on national security satellite contracts in 2013 and a favorable contract closeout settlement in 2012. These decreases were partially offset by activity on the new commercial contract awarded in 2013 mentioned above and a profit margin improvement on the CRS contract following favorable performance on the COTS and CRS-1 missions.
Operating income in the advanced space programs segment increased $4.3 million, or 15%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the favorable contract closeout settlement in 2012 mentioned above and increased activity on the CRS contract, partially offset by decreased activity on national security satellite contracts.
Advanced space programs segment operating margins (as a percentage of revenues) were 6.6%, 6.9% and 6.5% in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The segment operating margin in 2013 decreased marginally compared to 2012 primarily due to lower profit margins on national security satellite contracts in 2013 and the favorable contract closeout adjustment in 2012 discussed above, substantially offset by the profit margin improvement on the CRS contract discussed above. The increase in operating margin in 2012 compared to 2011 was principally due to the favorable closeout adjustment in 2012 discussed above .
Corporate and Other
Corporate and other revenues were comprised solely of the elimination of intersegment revenues of $43.3 million, $56.8 million and $125.1 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The intersegment revenue eliminations were primarily comprised of $31.9 million, $47.6 million and $114.4 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, of Antares revenues recorded in the launch vehicles segment in connection with the COTS program that was reported as a research and development program in our advanced space programs segment.
The operating losses in corporate and other of $2.1 million in 2012 consisted of professional fees and other costs related to a potential acquisition that was not consummated.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities in 2013 was $52.6 million, compared to cash used in operating activities of $7.7 million in 2012. The increase in operating cash flow resulted primarily from the net effect of changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities. During 2013, changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities used $92.0 million of cash, compared to $154.4 million of cash used in 2012. Changes in working capital in 2013 included an increase in receivables of $84.3 million that was principally due to an increase in unbilled receivables pertaining to the CRS contract. Under the terms of the CRS contract,
approximately 25% of the contract value is billable to the customer and collectible only upon the completion of launch and delivery milestones for each of eight CRS contract missions. Changes in working capital in 2013 also included a decrease in deferred revenues and customer advances of $40.8 million primarily due to the recognition of performance on certain satellite contracts. Partially offsetting these uses of cash in 2013 was an increase of $24.8 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a decrease of $9.1 million in other assets.
Cash used in operating activities in 2012 was $7.7 million, compared to cash provided by operating activities of $65.1 million in 2011. The decrease in operating cash flow resulted primarily from the net effect of changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities. During 2012, changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities used $154.4 million of cash, compared to $64.9 million of cash used in 2011. Changes in working capital in 2012 included an increase in receivables of $165.7 million principally due to an increase in unbilled receivables pertaining to the CRS contract. Partially offsetting the increase in receivables was the net effect of a $42.9 million decrease in deferred revenues and customer advances, a $30.6 million decrease in other assets and a $20.3 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $18.8 million, $26.6 million and $59.8 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We spent $35.7 million on capital expenditures in 2013, compared to $52.2 million in 2012 and $59.8 million in 2011. The reductions in capital expenditures were largely due to decreased spending for equipment to support our Antares and COTS development programs and our CRS contract. In 2013, we received proceeds of $12.8 million from the sale of investments (further discussed in Note 5 to the accompanying financial statements) and $4.0 million pertaining to a purchase price adjustment. In 2012, we received proceeds of $25.6 million in connection with the sale of certain property and equipment at the NASA Wallops Facility to the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million in 2013 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $7.4 million and $1.5 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we issued 0.9 million, 0.7 million and 0.7 million shares of common stock and received $4.8 million, $3.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in connection with stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases. In 2013, we also made $7.5 million of principal payments on our long-term debt.
In December 2012, we received proceeds of $150 million under a new senior secured term loan facility (the "Term Loan"), discussed below. The proceeds received under the Term Loan were used to repay substantially all of our outstanding 2.4375% convertible senior subordinated notes.
Term Loan and Credit Facility - As of December 31, 2013, we had $142.5 million outstanding in connection with our Term Loan under our revolving secured credit facility (the "Credit Facility"), discussed below.
The Term Loan matures on December 12, 2017, is secured on the same basis as the Credit Facility and bears interest, at our option, at the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 1.75% per annum or a base rate plus 0.75% per annum. We are required to make quarterly principal payments of approximately $1.9 million. The remaining principal amount of $114.4 million will be due at maturity. The Term Loan is otherwise subject to terms and conditions substantially similar to those in the Credit Facility regarding guarantees, covenants and events of default.
The Credit Facility provides capacity for up to $300 million of revolving loans and permits us to utilize up to $125 million of such capacity for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The Credit Facility matures on December 12, 2017. Our obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of our assets except for real property. We have the option to increase the amount of the Credit Facility by up to $150 million, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and the satisfaction of other specified conditions. Loans under the Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.50%, with the applicable margin varying according to our total leverage ratio, or, at our election, at a base rate plus 0.75% to 1.50%. Letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility accrue fees at a rate equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans. In addition, we are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee for the unused portion of the Credit Facility, if any, at a rate ranging from 0.30% to 0.50%.
As of December 31, 2013, there were no borrowings under the Credit Facility, although $4.0 million of letters of credit were issued under the Credit Facility. Furthermore, borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility is limited by certain financial covenants discussed below. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2013, approximately $250 million of the Credit Facility was available for borrowings.
Debt Covenants - Our Credit Facility contains covenants limiting our ability to, among other things, pay cash dividends, incur debt or liens, redeem or repurchase company stock, enter into transactions with affiliates, make investments, merge or consolidate with others or dispose of assets. In addition, the Credit Facility contains financial covenants with respect to leverage and interest coverage. As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.
Available Cash and Future Funding
At December 31, 2013, we had $265.8 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. Management believes that available cash, cash expected to be generated from operations and the borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund our operating and capital expenditure requirements over the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future. Significant unforeseen events such as termination of major orders or late delivery or failure of launch vehicle or satellite products could adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations. If market opportunities exist, we may choose to undertake financing actions to further enhance our
liquidity, which could include obtaining new bank debt or raising funds through capital market transactions; however, our ability to borrow additional funds is limited by the terms of our Credit Facility.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The following summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2013, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in millions):
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
Less than
1 Year
|
1 to 3
Years
|
3 to 5
Years
|
More than
5 Years
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
$
|
143.2
|
$
|
8.2
|
$
|
15.0
|
$
|
120.0
|
$
|
—
|
||||||||||
|
Interest on long-term debt (1)
|
9.8
|
2.7
|
4.9
|
2.2
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating leases (2)
|
129.2
|
18.7
|
36.4
|
32.0
|
42.1
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Purchase obligations (3)
|
338.8
|
275.5
|
59.4
|
2.4
|
1.5
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
621.0
|
$
|
305.1
|
$
|
115.7
|
$
|
156.6
|
$
|
43.6
|
||||||||||
––––––––––––––––––
| (1) | Interest on our variable-rate $143 million Term Loan assumes 1.91%, or one-month LIBOR plus 1.75%, in this presentation. |
| (2) | Our obligations under operating leases consist of minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office space and equipment. |
| (3) | Purchase obligations consist of open purchase orders that we issued to acquire materials, parts or services in future periods. |
Occasionally, certain contracts require us to post letters of credit supporting our performance obligations under the contracts. We had $4.0 million of letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2013, all of which were issued under the Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $18.8 million and $18.2 million, respectively. We are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of when a cash settlement, if any, will occur with the taxing authorities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
We believe that our potential market risk exposure is primarily related to changes in certain foreign currency exchange rates and interest rate risk. We manage these market risks through our normal financing and operating activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We do not enter into derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes, nor do we use leveraged financial instruments.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We believe that the potential change in foreign currency exchange rates is not a substantial risk to us because the large majority of our business transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. At December 31, 2013, we had $9.7 million of receivables denominated in euros and we had euro/U.S. dollar forward contracts with a fair value that was a liability of $1.3 million, as discussed in Note 1 to the accompanying financial statements.
Interest Rate Risk
We are impacted by changes in interest rates in the normal course of our business operations as a result of our ongoing investing and financing activities, which include our bank term loan as well as our cash and cash equivalents. We assess our interest rate risks on a regular basis.
As of December 31, 2013, the recorded value and fair value of our bank term loan was $142.5 million with a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.75%, or 1.91%. Generally, the fair market value of our variable interest rate debt will increase or decrease based on general market conditions for bank loans, Orbital's credit rating and the remaining term of the loan.
As of December 31, 2013, a hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates in connection with our cash and cash equivalents would result in an annual change of approximately $2 million in interest income.
Deferred Compensation Plan
We have an unfunded deferred compensation plan for senior managers and executive officers with a total liability balance of $13.5 million at December 31, 2013. This liability is subject to fluctuation based upon the market value of the investment options selected by participants.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
45
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
47
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
48
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
|
49
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
50
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
51
|
|
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
71
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Orbital Sciences Corporation:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Orbital Sciences Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 24, 2014
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
1,365,271
|
$
|
1,436,769
|
$
|
1,345,923
|
||||||
|
Cost of revenues
|
1,062,466
|
1,097,190
|
1,074,389
|
|||||||||
|
Research and development expenses
|
89,233
|
114,205
|
102,751
|
|||||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
100,027
|
112,803
|
88,989
|
|||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
113,545
|
112,571
|
79,794
|
|||||||||
|
Interest income and other, net
|
(5,368
|
)
|
749
|
19,335
|
||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(4,556
|
)
|
(11,275
|
)
|
(11,096
|
)
|
||||||
|
Debt extinguishment expense
|
-
|
(10,261
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
103,621
|
91,784
|
88,033
|
|||||||||
|
Income tax provision
|
(35,255
|
)
|
(30,778
|
)
|
(20,639
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
68,366
|
$
|
61,006
|
$
|
67,394
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic income per share
|
$
|
1.13
|
$
|
1.03
|
$
|
1.14
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Diluted income per share
|
$
|
1.13
|
$
|
1.02
|
$
|
1.13
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (from above)
|
$
|
68,366
|
$
|
61,006
|
$
|
67,394
|
||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||||||
|
Defined benefit plans, net of tax of $813, $263 and $(773), respectively
|
1,278
|
418
|
(1,248
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments
|
(50
|
)
|
700
|
(100
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign exchange derivative instruments, net of tax of $135 and $(339)
|
212
|
(540
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
|
1,440
|
578
|
(1,348
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
$
|
69,806
|
$
|
61,584
|
$
|
66,046
|
||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
265,837
|
$
|
232,324
|
||||
|
Receivables
|
583,518
|
499,222
|
||||||
|
Inventories
|
61,675
|
61,251
|
||||||
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
30,154
|
38,216
|
||||||
|
Other current assets
|
9,889
|
17,810
|
||||||
|
Total current assets
|
951,073
|
848,823
|
||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
246,060
|
251,360
|
||||||
|
Goodwill
|
71,260
|
75,261
|
||||||
|
Other non-current assets
|
16,368
|
36,010
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,284,761
|
$
|
1,211,454
|
||||
|
|
||||||||
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
281,631
|
$
|
257,113
|
||||
|
Deferred revenues and customer advances
|
21,250
|
62,098
|
||||||
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
8,236
|
7,500
|
||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
311,117
|
326,711
|
||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
135,000
|
143,236
|
||||||
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
26,611
|
10,879
|
||||||
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
16,732
|
17,082
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
489,460
|
497,908
|
||||||
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
||||||||
|
Preferred Stock, par value $.01; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
|
Common Stock, par value $.01; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 60,515,556 and 59,616,736 shares outstanding, respectively
|
605
|
596
|
||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
587,240
|
575,300
|
||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(1,341
|
)
|
(2,781
|
)
|
||||
|
Retained earnings
|
208,797
|
140,431
|
||||||
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
795,301
|
713,546
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
1,284,761
|
$
|
1,211,454
|
||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
Common Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
58,240
|
$
|
582
|
$
|
558,015
|
$
|
(2,011
|
)
|
$
|
12,031
|
$
|
568,617
|
||||||||||||
|
Shares issued to employees,
officers and directors
|
675
|
7
|
2,884
|
2,891
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation, net
|
4,490
|
4,490
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax effect of stock-based
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
compensation, net
|
1,235
|
1,235
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
(1,348
|
)
|
67,394
|
66,046
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2011
|
58,915
|
589
|
566,624
|
(3,359
|
)
|
79,425
|
643,279
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued to employees,
officers and directors
|
702
|
7
|
3,500
|
3,507
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation, net
|
4,960
|
4,960
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax effect of stock-based
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
compensation, net
|
216
|
216
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
578
|
61,006
|
61,584
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2012
|
59,617
|
596
|
575,300
|
(2,781
|
)
|
140,431
|
713,546
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued to employees,
officers and directors
|
899
|
9
|
4,824
|
4,833
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation, net
|
4,733
|
4,733
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax effect of stock-based
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
compensation, net
|
2,383
|
2,383
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
1,440
|
68,366
|
69,806
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2013
|
60,516
|
$
|
605
|
$
|
587,240
|
$
|
(1,341
|
)
|
$
|
208,797
|
$
|
795,301
|
||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
68,366
|
$
|
61,006
|
$
|
$ 67,394
|
||||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
41,479
|
37,339
|
32,739
|
|||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
22,843
|
26,886
|
18,788
|
|||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
7,722
|
6,402
|
6,222
|
|||||||||
|
Amortization of debt costs
|
570
|
6,751
|
6,590
|
|||||||||
|
Debt extinguishment expense
|
-
|
10,261
|
||||||||||
|
Other
|
3,598
|
(1,876
|
)
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Receivables
|
(84,296
|
)
|
(165,670
|
)
|
(6,969
|
)
|
||||||
|
Inventories
|
(425
|
)
|
3,084
|
(8,118
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Other assets
|
9,070
|
30,609
|
(37,346
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
24,818
|
20,260
|
(14,915
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Deferred revenue and customer advances
|
(40,848
|
)
|
(42,872
|
)
|
(7,212
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
(282
|
)
|
154
|
9,666
|
||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
52,615
|
(7,666
|
)
|
65,136
|
||||||||
|
Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
(35,655
|
)
|
(52,175
|
)
|
(59,815
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
12,836
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
Purchase price adjustment
|
4,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
Proceeds from disposition of property
|
-
|
25,589
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(18,819
|
)
|
(26,586
|
)
|
(59,815
|
)
|
||||||
|
Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
4,824
|
3,507
|
2,891
|
|||||||||
|
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation
|
2,393
|
495
|
1,676
|
|||||||||
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
(7,500
|
)
|
(145,179
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
-
|
150,000
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
-
|
(1,466
|
)
|
(3,084
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(283
|
)
|
7,357
|
1,483
|
||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
33,513
|
(26,895
|
)
|
6,804
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
232,324
|
259,219
|
252,415
|
|||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
$
|
$ 265,837
|
$
|
$ 232,324
|
$
|
$ 259,219
|
||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business Operations
Orbital Sciences Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, "Orbital" or the "company"), a Delaware corporation, develops and manufactures small- and medium-class rockets and space systems for commercial, military and civil government customers.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Orbital and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intersegment balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future contract costs and earnings. Such estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and earnings during the current reporting period. Management periodically assesses and evaluates the adequacy and/or deficiency of estimated liabilities recorded for various reserves, liabilities, contract risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
All financial amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.
Revenue Recognition
Orbital's revenues are derived primarily from long-term contracts. Revenues on long-term contracts are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Such revenues are recorded based on the percentage that costs incurred to date bear to the most recent estimates of total costs to complete each contract. Estimating future revenues, costs and profit is a process requiring a high degree of management judgment, including management's assumptions regarding the company's operational performance as well as general economic conditions. In the event of a change in total estimated contract revenue, cost or profit, the cumulative effect of such change is recorded in the period the change in estimate occurs. Aggregate net changes in contract estimates recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting increased operating income by $59 million and $61 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, and decreased operating income by $1 million in 2011. The adjustments in 2013 and 2012 were primarily attributable to improved operating results during the latter stages of completion of communications satellite contracts. Frequently, the period of performance of a contract extends over a long period of time and, as such, revenue recognition and the company's
profitability from a particular contract may be affected to the extent that estimated costs to complete or incentive or award fee estimates are revised, delivery schedules are delayed, performance-based milestones are not achieved or progress under a contract is otherwise impeded. Accordingly, the company's recorded revenues and operating profit from period to period can fluctuate significantly. In the event cost estimates indicate a loss on a contract, the total amount of such loss, excluding general and administrative expenses, is recorded in the period in which the loss is first estimated.
Many of the company's contracts include provisions that increase or decrease contract value based on performance in relation to established targets or customer evaluations. Mission success milestones and incentive and award fees are included in estimated contract revenue when the company is able to make reasonable predictions about whether the performance targets will be achieved and make dependable estimates of such amounts based upon the company's historical experience with similar types of activities and other objective criteria. The company includes the estimated amount of mission success milestones and incentive and award fees in estimated contract revenue at the inception of each contract, with reassessments made each quarter throughout the period of contract performance. If performance under such contracts were to differ from previous assumptions, or if the company were to revise its estimates or assumptions, current period revenues and profit would be adjusted and could fluctuate significantly. The company's assessments are guided by the historical performance of the company's products and product families, the reliability record of the technology employed and assessments of technological considerations for each contract.
As part of the company's risk management strategy, the company generally insures significant mission success milestones. Insurance recoveries are recorded as other income in the consolidated financial statements.
Research and Development Expenses
Expenditures for company-sponsored research and development projects are expensed as incurred. Research and development projects performed under contracts for customers are recorded as contract costs.
In 2013, the company completed the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services ("COTS") research and development program for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA"). The COTS program was accounted for as a best-efforts research and development cost-sharing arrangement. As such, the amounts funded by NASA were recognized proportionally as an offset to the company's COTS program research and development expenses, including associated general and administrative expenses.
The following table summarizes the COTS program research and development expenses incurred and amounts funded by NASA through completion of the program in 2013 (in millions):
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
Inception to December 31, 2013
|
||||||||||||
|
Research and development costs incurred (1)
|
$
|
49.9
|
$
|
62.6
|
$
|
158.8
|
$
|
530.4
|
||||||||
|
Less amounts funded by NASA
|
(5.8
|
)
|
(21.9
|
)
|
(108.0
|
)
|
(288.0
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net research and development expenses
|
$
|
44.1
|
$
|
40.7
|
$
|
50.8
|
$
|
242.4
|
||||||||
_______________________
(1) Includes associated general and administrative expenses.
The company has also been engaged in a major product development program of a medium capacity rocket named Antares. Approximately $15.8 million, $42.6 million and $34.3 million of the company's research and development expenses in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were attributable to the Antares program. Since the inception of the Antares program through December 31, 2013, the company has incurred $250.6 million of such costs.
Stock-Based Compensation
The company determines the fair value of its restricted stock unit grants based on the closing price of Orbital's common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, although the company has not granted stock options since 2006. Compensation expense pertaining to stock-based awards is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The company uses the tax law ordering method to determine intra-period tax allocation related to the tax attributes of stock-based compensation.
Income Taxes
Orbital accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The company also recognizes liabilities for uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not that a tax position will not be sustained upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. If a tax position does not meet the "more-likely-than-not" recognition threshold, despite the company's belief that its filing position is supportable, the benefit of that tax position is not recognized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a tax rate change on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The company records valuation allowances to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount considered more likely than not to be realized. Changes in estimates of future taxable income can materially change the amount of such valuation allowances.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted-average effect of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
Numerator
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$
|
68,366
|
$
|
61,006
|
$
|
67,394
|
||||||
|
Percentage allocated to shareholders (1)
|
99.8
|
%
|
99.6
|
%
|
99.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
68,229
|
$
|
60,762
|
$
|
66,787
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Denominator
|
||||||||||||
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share -weighted-average shares outstanding
|
60,161
|
59,165
|
58,531
|
|||||||||
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units
|
283
|
292
|
596
|
|||||||||
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share
|
60,444
|
59,457
|
59,127
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Per share income
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.13
|
$
|
1.03
|
$
|
1.14
|
||||||
|
Diluted
|
1.13
|
1.02
|
1.13
|
|||||||||
|
_________________________
|
||||||||||||
|
(1) Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
|
60,161
|
59,165
|
58,531
|
|||||||||
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding and
|
||||||||||||
|
unvested restricted stock units expected to vest
|
60,247
|
59,428
|
59,078
|
|||||||||
|
Percentage allocated to shareholders
|
99.8
|
%
|
99.6
|
%
|
99.1
|
%
|
||||||
Certain of the company's unvested restricted stock units ("RSUs") during 2013, 2012 and 2011 contained rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends, although as of December 31, 2013, all such RSUs had vested. In accordance with GAAP, the company accounted for unvested RSUs with non-forfeitable rights to dividends as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share using the two-class method. The calculation of earnings per share shown above excludes the income attributable to the unvested RSUs that included rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends from the numerator and excluded the impact of those units from the denominator.
In 2013, 2012 and 2011, diluted weighted-average shares outstanding excluded the effect of the company's convertible notes that were anti-dilutive.
Fair Value Measurements
The company utilizes fair value measurement guidance prescribed by GAAP to value its financial instruments. The guidance includes a definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements.
The valuation techniques utilized are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect internal market assumptions.
These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level 3 - Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.
Fair value disclosures pertaining to financial instruments of the company that are included in these notes to the consolidated financial statements include money market funds (see Note 1, subsection "Cash and Cash Equivalents"), foreign exchange derivative instruments (see Note 1, subsection "Derivative Financial Instruments") and long-term debt (see Note 6).
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of 90 days or less. The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximates its fair value. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the company had invested approximately $260 million and $215 million, respectively, in cash equivalents in the form of money market funds with three financial institutions. The company considers these money market funds to be Level 1 financial instruments.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or estimated market value. Cost is determined on an average cost or specific identification basis. Estimated market value is determined based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions were less favorable than those previously projected by management, inventory write-downs could be required.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Orbital occasionally uses foreign exchange derivative instruments to manage certain foreign currency rate exposures. Derivative instruments are viewed as risk management tools by Orbital and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. Derivatives used for hedging purposes are generally designated as effective hedges. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of a derivative contract are highly correlated with changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged item at inception of the hedge and over the life of the hedge contract. Derivative instruments are
recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The ineffective portion of all hedges, if any, is recognized currently in earnings.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the company had foreign exchange contracts with total contract values of €16.4 million and €56.0 million, or $21.4 million and $72.9 million, respectively, with various expiration dates through January 2015. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of these foreign exchange contracts was a liability of $1.3 million. The company considers these fair value measures to be Level 2 measures that are based on quoted forward rates from a financial institution.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major improvements are capitalized while expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor improvements are charged to expense. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized.
Depreciation expense is determined using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:
|
Buildings
|
20 years
|
|
Machinery, equipment and software
|
3 to 12 years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
Shorter of estimated useful life or lease term
|
The company self-constructs some of its ground and airborne support and special test equipment utilized in the manufacture, production and delivery of some of its products. Orbital capitalizes direct costs incurred in constructing such equipment and certain allocated indirect costs. The company also capitalizes certain costs incurred in connection with internally developed software. These capitalized costs generally include direct software coding costs and certain allocated indirect costs.
Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets
Orbital's policy is to evaluate its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. When an evaluation indicates that an impairment has occurred, a loss is recognized and the asset or asset group is adjusted to its estimated fair value. Given the inherent technical and commercial risks within the aerospace industry and the special purpose use of certain of the company's assets, future impairment charges could be required if the company were to change its current expectation that it will recover the carrying amount of its long-lived assets from future operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill is comprised of acquisition costs in excess of the fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is evaluated for potential impairment at least annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The evaluation includes comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value including goodwill. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, impairment is measured by comparing the implied value of goodwill to its carrying value and recorded in the current period. Goodwill balances are included in the identifiable assets of the business segment to which they have been assigned. There was no impairment of goodwill recorded during the three years ending December 31, 2013.
Deferred Revenue and Customer Advances
The company accounts for cash receipts from customers in excess of amounts recognized on certain contracts as "deferred revenues and customer advances." These amounts are recorded as current liabilities since the associated services are performed within one year.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2013, authoritative accounting guidance became effective for the company pertaining to the disclosure of amounts that are reclassified out of other comprehensive income and into net income. During 2013, such reclassifications in the company's financial statements were not material.
2. Segment Information
Orbital's products and services are grouped into three reportable business segments: launch vehicles, satellites and space systems and advanced space programs. Reportable segments are generally organized based upon product lines. Corporate office transactions that have not been attributed to a particular segment, as well as consolidating eliminations and adjustments, are reported in corporate and other. The primary products and services from which the company's reportable segments derive revenues are:
| ● | Launch Vehicles - Rockets that are used as small- and medium-class space launch vehicles that place satellites into Earth orbit and escape trajectories, interceptor and target vehicles for missile defense systems and suborbital launch vehicles that place payloads into a variety of high-altitude trajectories. |
| ● | Satellites and Space Systems - Small- and medium-class satellites that are used to enable global and regional communications and broadcasting, conduct space-related scientific research, collect imagery and other remotely-sensed data about the Earth, carry out interplanetary and other deep-space exploration missions, and demonstrate new space technologies. |
| ● | Advanced Space Programs - Human-rated space systems for Earth-orbit and deep-space exploration, and small- and medium-class satellites used for national security space programs and to demonstrate new space technologies, and advanced flight systems for atmospheric and space missions. |
Intersegment sales are generally negotiated and accounted for under terms and conditions that are similar to other commercial and government contracts. Substantially all of the company's assets and operations are located within the United States.
The following table presents operating information and identifiable assets by reportable segment (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Launch Vehicles:
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
551,709
|
$
|
527,287
|
$
|
483,177
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
48,831
|
36,131
|
14,147
|
|||||||||
|
Identifiable assets
|
195,294
|
206,194
|
210,642
|
|||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
8,882
|
26,066
|
27,999
|
|||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
17,990
|
15,891
|
14,293
|
|||||||||
|
Satellites and Space Systems:
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
387,505
|
$
|
496,152
|
$
|
553,797
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
33,938
|
46,222
|
37,623
|
|||||||||
|
Identifiable assets
|
288,343
|
278,008
|
282,344
|
|||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
18,359
|
16,345
|
12,433
|
|||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
8,366
|
8,563
|
6,841
|
|||||||||
|
Advanced Space Programs:
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
469,400
|
$
|
470,102
|
$
|
434,036
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
30,776
|
32,309
|
28,024
|
|||||||||
|
Identifiable assets
|
448,015
|
390,059
|
254,769
|
|||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
4,652
|
5,781
|
13,515
|
|||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
8,872
|
6,575
|
5,033
|
|||||||||
|
Corporate and Other:
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues (1)
|
$
|
(43,343
|
)
|
$
|
(56,772
|
)
|
$
|
(125,087
|
)
|
|||
|
Operating loss (2)
|
-
|
(2,091
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
|
Identifiable assets
|
353,109
|
337,193
|
383,045
|
|||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
3,762
|
3,983
|
5,868
|
|||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
6,251
|
6,310
|
6,572
|
|||||||||
|
Consolidated:
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
1,365,271
|
$
|
1,436,769
|
$
|
1,345,923
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
113,545
|
112,571
|
79,794
|
|||||||||
|
Identifiable assets
|
1,284,761
|
1,211,454
|
1,130,800
|
|||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
35,655
|
52,175
|
59,815
|
|||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
41,479
|
37,339
|
32,739
|
|||||||||
________________
| (1) | Corporate and other revenues are comprised solely of the elimination of intersegment revenues. Intersegment revenues are summarized as follows (in millions): |
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Launch Vehicles
|
$
|
38.2
|
$
|
50.2
|
$
|
118.3
|
||||||
|
Satellites and Space Systems
|
4.1
|
5.7
|
5.6
|
|||||||||
|
Advanced Space Programs
|
1.0
|
0.9
|
1.2
|
|||||||||
|
Total intersegment revenues
|
$
|
43.3
|
$
|
56.8
|
$
|
125.1
|
||||||
| (2) | The corporate and other operating loss in 2012 is comprised solely of unallocated professional fees and other costs related to a potential acquisition that was not consummated. |
3. Export Sales and Major Customers
Orbital's revenues by geographic area, as determined by customer location, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
1,225,217
|
$
|
1,155,003
|
$
|
1,035,090
|
||||||
|
Europe and Eurasia
|
91,838
|
150,746
|
146,623
|
|||||||||
|
Mexico and South America
|
8,071
|
96,147
|
131,240
|
|||||||||
|
East Asia
|
40,145
|
34,873
|
32,970
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,365,271
|
$
|
1,436,769
|
$
|
1,345,923
|
||||||
Approximately 83%, 79% and 71% of the company's revenues in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were generated under contracts with the U.S. Government and its agencies or under subcontracts with the U.S. Government's prime contractors.
4. Balance Sheet Accounts and Supplemental Disclosures
Receivables
The components of receivables were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
|
Billed
|
$
|
68,474
|
$
|
59,496
|
||||
|
Unbilled
|
514,238
|
439,372
|
||||||
|
Retainages due upon contract completion
|
806
|
354
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
583,518
|
$
|
499,222
|
||||
Under the terms of the company's Commercial Resupply Services ("CRS") contract with NASA, approximately 25% of the contract value is billable to the customer and collectible only upon the completion of launch and delivery milestones for each of eight CRS contract missions which are currently scheduled to occur through 2016. Unbilled receivables at December 31, 2013 and 2012 included $335 million and $277 million, respectively, pertaining to the CRS contract. which will be collected as launches occur, scheduled through 2016. Since the inception of the CRS contract in December 2008 through December 31, 2013, a total of $1.3 billion of revenues have been recognized on the contract, which has a total contract value of approximately $1.9 billion.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, unbilled receivables also included $9.9 million and $8.7 million, respectively, of incentive fees on certain completed satellite contracts that become due incrementally over periods of up to 15 years, subject to the achievement of performance criteria.
Certain satellite contracts require the company to refund a portion of the contract price to the customer if performance criteria, which cover periods of up to 15 years, are not satisfied. As of December 31, 2013, the company could be required to refund up to approximately $16.7 million
to customers if certain completed satellites were to fail to satisfy performance criteria. Orbital generally procures insurance policies under which the company believes it would recover satellite incentive fees that are not earned and performance refund obligations.
Excluding the portion of unbilled receivables pertaining to the CRS contract discussed separately above, approximately 93% of unbilled receivables and retainages at December 31, 2013 are due within one year and will be billed on the basis of contract terms and delivery schedules. Approximately 90% and 91% of the company's receivables at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were related to contracts with the U.S. Government and its agencies or under subcontracts with the U.S. Government's prime contractors. Receivables from non-U.S. customers totaled $14.7 million and $34.1 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Inventories
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, inventories were $61.7 million and $61.3 million, respectively. The company's inventory consisted of component parts, raw materials and milestone payments for future delivery of component parts.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
10,656
|
$
|
10,656
|
||||
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
88,390
|
85,803
|
||||||
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
337,737
|
298,082
|
||||||
|
Assets under construction
|
38,030
|
45,928
|
||||||
|
Software and other
|
29,619
|
33,310
|
||||||
|
|
504,432
|
473,779
|
||||||
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(258,372
|
)
|
(222,419
|
)
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
246,060
|
$
|
251,360
|
||||
The company received proceeds of $25.6 million in 2012 in connection with the sale of property and equipment at the Wallops Island Flight Facility to the Commonwealth of Virginia. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $40.8 million, $36.6 million and $32.0 million, respectively.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The company's goodwill balances by reportable business segment are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Launch Vehicles
|
Satellites and Space Systems
|
Advanced Space Programs
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2013
|
$
|
10,310
|
$
|
51,837
|
$
|
9,113
|
$
|
71,260
|
||||||||
In 2013, the company recorded a $4 million reduction in total goodwill in connection with a purchase price adjustment.
Intangible assets consist of technology assets that were acquired in a 2010 spacecraft business acquisition. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance of intangible assets was $4.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively, reported in "other non-current assets." Amortization expense was $0.7 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
|
Contract related accruals
|
$
|
147,689
|
$
|
169,146
|
||||
|
Employee compensation and benefits related liabilities
|
78,024
|
77,241
|
||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
50,650
|
4,037
|
||||||
|
Other
|
5,268
|
6,689
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
281,631
|
$
|
257,113
|
||||
Cash Flow
Cash payments for interest and income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Interest paid
|
$
|
4,040
|
$
|
6,733
|
$
|
4,158
|
||||||
|
Income taxes paid
|
11,480
|
2,699
|
2,242
|
|||||||||
The entire amount of cash disbursed in 2012 in connection with the repayment of certain of the company's long-term notes payable (see Note 6) was classified as repayment of long-term debt in financing activities in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows.
5. Investments
In the fourth quarter of 2013, the company sold all of its investments in auction-rate securities and preferred stock that were recorded at a fair value of $9.2 million as of December 31, 2012. Accordingly, there were no such investments at December 31, 2013. The company received $12.8 million in proceeds from the sale, resulting in a $3.7 million gain in 2013 recorded in interest income and other, net. The sold investments were not significant to the accompanying consolidated financial statements taken as a whole; accordingly, additional related disclosures are omitted from these notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
|
Senior secured term loan
|
$
|
142,500
|
$
|
150,000
|
||||
|
Convertible senior subordinated notes
|
736
|
736
|
||||||
|
|
143,236
|
150,736
|
||||||
|
Less current portion
|
(8,236
|
)
|
(7,500
|
)
|
||||
|
Long-term portion
|
$
|
135,000
|
$
|
143,236
|
||||
The fair value of the senior secured term loan (the "Term Loan") under the company's revolving secured credit facility (the "Credit Facility") was $142.5 million and $150.0 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, based on current market rates for debt of the same risk and maturity. The company considers these to be Level 2 measures.
Term Loan and Credit Facility
In December 2012, the company entered into an amendment (the "Amendment") to its existing Credit Facility, discussed below. The Amendment provided for a new $150 million Term Loan and extended the scheduled maturity on the Credit Facility to December 12, 2017. The net proceeds received under the Term Loan were used to repay substantially all of the company's outstanding 2.4375% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2027. Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the Amendment and issuance of the Term Loan amounted to $1.5 million, which are being amortized to interest expense over the five-year term.
The Term Loan matures on December 12, 2017, is secured on the same basis as the Credit Facility and bears interest, at the company's option, at the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 1.75% per annum or a base rate plus 0.75% per annum. The company is required to make quarterly principal payments of approximately $1.9 million. The remaining principal amount of $114.4 million will be due at maturity. The Term Loan is otherwise subject to terms and conditions substantially similar to those in the Credit Facility regarding guarantees, covenants and events of default.
The Credit Facility provides capacity for up to $300 million of revolving loans and permits the company to utilize up to $125 million of such capacity for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The Credit Facility matures on December 12, 2017. The company's obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of the company's assets except for real property. The company has the option to increase the amount of the Credit Facility by up to $150 million, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and the satisfaction of other specified conditions. Loans under the Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.50%, with the applicable margin varying according to the company's total leverage ratio, or, at the election of the company, at a base rate plus 0.75% to 1.50%. Letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility accrue fees at a rate equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans. In addition, the company is required to pay a quarterly commitment fee for the unused portion of the Credit Facility, if any, at a rate ranging from 0.30% to 0.50%.
As of December 31, 2013, there were no revolving loan borrowings under the Credit Facility, although $4.0 million of letters of credit were issued under the Credit Facility. Furthermore, borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility is limited by certain financial covenants, discussed below. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2013, approximately $250 million of the Credit Facility was available for borrowings.
Debt Covenants
Orbital's Credit Facility contains covenants limiting the company's ability to, among other things, pay cash dividends, incur debt or liens, redeem or repurchase company stock, enter into transactions with affiliates, make investments, merge or consolidate with others or dispose of assets. In addition, the Credit Facility contains financial covenants with respect to leverage and interest coverage. As of December 31, 2013, the company was in compliance with all of these covenants.
Debt Extinguishment Expenses
During 2012, the company recorded $10.3 million of debt extinguishment expenses associated with the repurchase of the convertible notes, described above, consisting of $6.8 million of accelerated amortization of debt discount, $2.8 million in prepayment premiums and other expenses, and $0.7 million in accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs.
7. Income Taxes
The significant components of the company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
|
Current Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities):
|
||||||||
|
U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards
|
$
|
344
|
$
|
8,909
|
||||
|
Capitalized research and development costs
|
10,507
|
8,921
|
||||||
|
Accruals, reserves and other
|
24,661
|
25,374
|
||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(5,358
|
)
|
(4,988
|
)
|
||||
|
Current deferred tax assets (liabilities), net
|
30,154
|
38,216
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Noncurrent Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities):
|
||||||||
|
State net operating loss carryforwards
|
432
|
1,136
|
||||||
|
Capitalized research and development costs
|
-
|
15,847
|
||||||
|
Tax credit/capital loss carryforwards and other
|
15,375
|
18,296
|
||||||
|
Excess tax depreciation and other
|
(40,591
|
)
|
(42,602
|
)
|
||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(1,827
|
)
|
(3,556
|
)
|
||||
|
Noncurrent deferred tax (liabilities) assets, net
|
(26,611
|
)
|
(10,879
|
)
|
||||
|
Total deferred tax assets, net
|
$
|
3,543
|
$
|
27,337
|
||||
The company's income tax provisions for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Current:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
7,573
|
$
|
1,889
|
$
|
384
|
||||||
|
State
|
2,858
|
1,862
|
841
|
|||||||||
|
Foreign
|
61
|
102
|
115
|
|||||||||
|
Total current
|
10,492
|
3,853
|
1,340
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Deferred:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal
|
25,667
|
29,264
|
29,558
|
|||||||||
|
State
|
(904
|
)
|
(2,339
|
)
|
(10,259
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total deferred
|
24,763
|
26,925
|
19,299
|
|||||||||
|
Total income tax provision
|
$
|
35,255
|
$
|
30,778
|
$
|
20,639
|
||||||
The company's income before income taxes included foreign income of $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the company's effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|||
|
U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
35.0%
|
|
|
35.0%
|
|
|
35.0%
|
|
State taxes
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Domestic manufacturing deduction
|
|
(2.1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Extraterritorial income exclusion
|
|
(1.0)
|
|
|
(3.1)
|
|
|
(8.7)
|
|
Research and development credits
|
|
(0.7)
|
|
|
(1.7)
|
|
|
(4.5)
|
|
Other, net
|
|
(0.5)
|
|
|
(0.3)
|
|
|
(1.7)
|
|
Effective rate
|
|
34.0%
|
|
|
33.5%
|
|
|
23.4%
|
The company recognized research and development tax credits in all periods presented that were primarily attributable to the company's Antares and COTS research and development programs that are further discussed in Note 1. In addition, the company recorded favorable income tax adjustments of $1.1 million, $2.8 million and $7.7 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, pertaining to extraterritorial income exclusions.
At December 31, 2013, the company had U.S. capital loss carryforwards of $17.4 million, which expire beginning in 2015 through 2018. The deferred tax assets related to capital losses have been fully offset with a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of realization. These capital loss carryforwards are subject to certain limitations and other restrictions.
At December 31, 2013, the company had no remaining U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards.
Changes in the company's unrecognized tax benefits were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year
|
$
|
18,200
|
$
|
16,732
|
$
|
12,386
|
||||||
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
-
|
-
|
2,325
|
|||||||||
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
646
|
1,548
|
2,351
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction resulting from lapse of statute of limitation
|
(10
|
)
|
(80
|
)
|
(330
|
)
|
||||||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year
|
$
|
18,836
|
$
|
18,200
|
$
|
16,732
|
||||||
All unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would lower the effective tax rate.
The company is subject to U.S. federal income tax and income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. The company has substantially concluded all income tax matters for years through 1989. In addition, the IRS completed an audit of the company's 2005 federal income tax return in 2008.
The company's practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. No interest or penalties have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
Aggregate minimum commitments under non-cancelable operating leases, primarily for office space and equipment rentals, at December 31, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
|
2014
|
$
|
18,670
|
||
|
2015
|
18,604
|
|||
|
2016
|
17,765
|
|||
|
2017
|
15,049
|
|||
|
2018
|
16,992
|
|||
|
Thereafter
|
42,070
|
|||
|
|
$
|
129,150
|
Rent expense for 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $19.4 million, $19.7 million and $19.3 million, respectively.
U.S. Government Contracts
The accuracy and appropriateness of costs charged to U.S. Government contracts are subject to regulation, audit and possible disallowance by the Defense Contract Audit Agency or other government agencies. Accordingly, costs billed or billable to U.S. Government customers are subject to potential adjustment upon audit by such agencies.
Most of the company's U.S. Government contracts are funded incrementally on a year-to-year basis. Changes in government policies, priorities or funding levels through agency or program budget reductions by the U.S. Congress or executive agencies could materially adversely affect the company's financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, contracts with the U.S. Government may be terminated or suspended by the U.S. Government at any time, with or without cause. Such contract suspensions or terminations could result in unreimbursable expenses or charges or otherwise adversely affect the company's financial condition and/or results of operations.
Research and Development Expenses
The company believes that a majority of the company's research and development expenses are recoverable and billable under contracts with the U.S. Government, from which the majority of the company's revenues are derived. Charging practices relating to research and development and other costs that may be charged directly or indirectly to government contracts are subject to audit by U.S. Government agencies to determine if such costs are reasonable and allowable under government contracting regulations and accounting practices. The company believes that research and development costs incurred in connection with the company's Antares development program (see Note 1) are allowable, although the U.S. Government has not yet made a final determination with respect to approximately $177 million of such costs incurred through 2013. If such costs were determined to be unallowable, the company could be required to record revenue and profit reductions in future periods.
Litigation
From time to time the company is party to certain litigation or other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Because of the uncertainties inherent in litigation, the company cannot predict the outcome of such litigation or other legal proceedings; however, the company believes that none of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the company's results of operations or financial condition.
In 2013, the company recorded a $10 million charge in interest income and other, net to write off an option payment pertaining to a business agreement that was terminated in the fourth quarter of 2013 in connection with the conclusion of litigation.
9. Stock Plans and Equity Transactions
Stock Plans
The company's share-based incentive plans permit the company to grant restricted stock units, restricted stock, incentive or non-qualified stock options, and certain other instruments to employees, directors, consultants and advisers of the company. Restricted stock units and stock options generally vest over three years and are not subject to any performance criteria. Options expire no more than ten years following the grant date. Shares issued under the plans upon option exercise or stock unit conversion are generally issued from authorized but previously unissued shares.
The company also has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") whereby employees may purchase shares of stock at the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of shares at the beginning or the end of quarterly offering periods. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 326,000 shares of common stock were available for purchase under the ESPP. Compensation expense associated with the ESPP was $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Equity Transactions
The following tables summarize information related to stock-based compensation transactions and plans:
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
Stock Options
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Number of
Units
|
Weighted Average
Measurement
Date Fair Value
|
Number of
Options
|
Weighted Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
684,674
|
$
|
16.38
|
1,226,582
|
$
|
6.46
|
||||||||||
|
Granted (1)
|
442,110
|
17.39
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
(317,647
|
)
|
4.26
|
|||||||||||
|
Vested
|
(330,356
|
)
|
18.47
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(14,316
|
)
|
16.57
|
(448
|
)
|
5.79
|
||||||||||
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
(6,200
|
)
|
3.91
|
|||||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
782,112
|
16.07
|
902,287
|
7.25
|
||||||||||||
|
Granted (1)
|
529,446
|
12.90
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
(343,734
|
)
|
6.28
|
|||||||||||
|
Vested
|
(345,945
|
)
|
15.77
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(29,980
|
)
|
14.85
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
(599
|
)
|
5.79
|
|||||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
|
935,633
|
14.42
|
557,954
|
7.84
|
||||||||||||
|
Granted (1)
|
513,490
|
18.65
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
(480,379
|
)
|
7.19
|
|||||||||||
|
Vested
|
(476,811
|
)
|
14.70
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(23,468
|
)
|
15.38
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
(2,575
|
)
|
7.16
|
|||||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
|
948,844
|
$
|
16.55
|
75,000
|
(2)
|
$
|
12.07
|
|||||||||
____________
| (1) | The fair value of restricted stock unit grants is determined based on the closing market price of Orbital's common stock on the date of grant. Such value is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures. |
| (2) | The weighted average remaining contractual term is 1.5 years, and the range of exercise prices is $9.71-$12.98. All outstanding options were exercisable as of December 31, 2013. |
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized
|
$
|
7.7
|
$
|
6.4
|
$
|
6.2
|
||||||
|
Income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense
|
3.0
|
2.5
|
2.0
|
|||||||||
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised, computed as the market price on the exercise date less the price paid to exercise the options
|
4.4
|
2.6
|
3.8
|
|||||||||
|
Cash received from exercise of options
|
3.5
|
2.1
|
1.4
|
|||||||||
|
Grant date fair value of vested restricted stock units
|
7.0
|
5.5
|
6.1
|
|||||||||
|
Tax benefit recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital related to stock-based compensation transactions
|
2.4
|
0.2
|
1.2
|
|||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
As of
December 31, 2013
|
|||
|
Shares of common stock available for grant under the company's stock-based incentive plans
|
2.5
|
|||
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock units that are expected to vest
|
$
|
22.1
|
||
|
Unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock units, expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.09 years
|
12.4
|
|||
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding, all fully vested
|
0.8
|
|||
10. Employee Benefit Plans
The company has a defined contribution plan (the "Plan") generally covering all full-time employees. Company contributions to the Plan are made based on plan provisions and at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The company made contributions of $19.9 million, $19.9 million and $18.6 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The company also has two overfunded defined benefit plans that were frozen upon acquisition in a 1994 business combination. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the company had recorded a $4.9 million and $2.7 million asset, respectively, in other non-current assets related to the pension plans. The plans are not significant to the accompanying consolidated financial statements taken as a whole; accordingly, additional related disclosures are omitted from these notes to the consolidated financial statements.
The company has a deferred compensation plan for senior managers and executive officers. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, liabilities related to this plan totaling $13.5 million and $11.7 million, respectively, were included in accrued expenses.
11. Summary of Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial data for the previous two years (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
March 31
|
June 30
|
Sept. 30
|
Dec. 31
|
||||||||||||
|
2013
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
334,813
|
$
|
333,081
|
$
|
321,976
|
$
|
375,401
|
||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
31,107
|
26,306
|
25,606
|
30,526
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
19,602
|
16,279
|
15,552
|
16,933
|
(1)
|
|||||||||||
|
Basic income per share
|
0.33
|
0.27
|
0.26
|
0.28
|
||||||||||||
|
Diluted income per share
|
0.33
|
0.27
|
0.26
|
0.28
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
338,030
|
$
|
371,268
|
$
|
372,882
|
$
|
354,589
|
||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
23,846
|
26,092
|
31,313
|
31,320
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
12,993
|
14,614
|
19,452
|
13,947
|
(2)
|
|||||||||||
|
Basic income per share
|
0.22
|
0.25
|
0.33
|
0.29
|
||||||||||||
|
Diluted income per share
|
0.22
|
0.25
|
0.33
|
0.29
|
||||||||||||
______________________
| (1) | In December 2013, the company recorded a $10.0 million pretax charge ($6.1 million after tax) to write off a non-current asset and a $3.7 million gain (pretax and after tax) on the sale of investments. |
(2) In December 2012, the company recorded a $10.3 million pretax debt extinguishment charge ($6.3 million after tax) related to a financing transaction.
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011
(In thousands)
|
|
Additions
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Description
|
Balance at
Start of
Period
|
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
|
Charged/
Credited to
Other
Accounts
|
Deductions
|
Balance
at End of
Period
|
|||||||||||||||
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
$
|
12,793
|
$
|
75
|
$
|
38
|
$
|
(3,513
|
)
|
$
|
9,393
|
|||||||||
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
9,393
|
2
|
(210
|
)
|
(641
|
)
|
8,544
|
|||||||||||||
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
8,544
|
6,463
|
71
|
(7,894
|
)
|
7,184
|
||||||||||||||
Disclosure
None.
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 1992. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on our evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013. The effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
None.
PART III
The information required by this Item is included under the captions "Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I above and under the captions "Proposal 1 - Election of Directors - Directors to be Elected at the 2014 Annual Meeting, - Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2015, - Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2016," "Corporate Governance - Code of Business Conduct and Ethics," "Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Its Committees - Board Committees" and "Other Matters - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or about March 10, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item is included under the captions "Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion and Analysis, - Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report, - Summary Compensation Table, - Grants of Plan-Based Awards, - Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End, - Stock Vested, - Pension Benefits, - Nonqualified Deferred Compensation, - Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Its Committees - Director Compensation" in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or about March 10, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is included under the captions "Ownership of Common Stock" in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or about March 10, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item is included under the caption "Proposal 2 - Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Fees of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, - Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services" in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or about March 10, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item is included under the caption "Proposal 2 Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Fees of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, - Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services" in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or about March 10, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
|
(a)
|
|
Documents filed as part of this Report:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Financial Statements.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
The following financial statements, together with the report of independent registered public accounting firm, are filed as a part of this report:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
The following additional financial data are transmitted with this report and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements contained herein. Schedules other than those listed below have been omitted because they are inapplicable or are not required.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Exhibits.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
A complete listing of exhibits required is given in the Exhibit Index that precedes the exhibits filed with this report.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
(b)
|
|
See Item 15(a)(3) of this report.
|
||||
|
(c)
|
|
See Item 15(a)(2) of this report.
|
||||
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
Dated: February 24, 2014
|
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ David W. Thompson
|
|
|
|
David W. Thompson
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Dated: February 24, 2014
|
Signature:
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David W. Thompson
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer, Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
David W. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Garrett E. Pierce
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer,
Director (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
Garrett E. Pierce
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hollis M. Thompson
Hollis M. Thompson
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin P. Chilton
|
|
Director
|
|
Kevin P. Chilton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lennard A. Fisk
|
|
Director
|
|
Lennard A. Fisk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert M. Hanisee
|
|
Director
|
|
Robert M. Hanisee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Hermann
|
|
Director
|
|
Robert J. Hermann
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald T. Kadish
|
|
Director
|
|
Ronald T. Kadish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Janice I. Obuchowski
|
|
Director
|
|
Janice I. Obuchowski
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James G. Roche
|
|
Director
|
|
James G. Roche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frank L. Salizzoni
|
|
Director
|
|
Frank L. Salizzoni
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harrison H. Schmitt
|
|
Director
|
|
Harrison H. Schmitt
|
|
|
|
/s/ James R. Thompson
|
|
Director
|
|
James R. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott L. Webster
|
|
Director
|
|
Scott L. Webster
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report. Where such filing is made by incorporation by reference to a previously filed statement or report, such statement or report is identified in parentheses.
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File Number 333-08769) filed and effective on July 25, 1996).
|
|
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2011).
|
|
|
3.3
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated April 29, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
|
|
|
3.4
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated April 30, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003).
|
|
|
4.1
|
Form of Certificate of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-33453) filed on February 9, 1990 and effective on April 24, 1990).
|
|
|
10.1
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2011, by and among Orbital Sciences Corporation, as Borrower, the subsidiaries of the Borrower party thereto as Guarantors (the "Guarantors"), the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Issuing Lender, Wells Fargo Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, Citibank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. as Co-Syndication Agents and PNC Bank, N.A. and Sovereign Bank as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 10, 2011).
|
|
|
10.2
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012, by and among Orbital Sciences Corporation, the Guarantors, and the lenders and agents party thereto (filed herewith).
|
|
|
10.3
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2012, among Orbital Sciences Corporation, the Guarantors, and the lenders and agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2012).
|
|
|
10.4
|
Security and Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2011, between Orbital Sciences Corporation, the other obligors party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 10, 2011).
|
|
|
10.5
|
Lease Agreement dated as of September 29, 1989, by and among Corporate Property Associates 8, L.P., Corporate Property Associates 9, L.P. and Space Data Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-33453) filed on February 9, 1990).
|
|
|
10.6
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated as of December 27, 1990, by and among Corporate Property Associates 8, L.P., Corporate Property Associates 9, L.P. and Space Data Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.1 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991).
|
|
|
10.7
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated as of November 5, 2008, by and between Corporate Property Associates 9, L.P. and Orbital Sciences Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 12, 2008).
|
|
|
10.8
|
Orbital Sciences Corporation 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, amended as of November 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007).*
|
|
|
10.9
|
Orbital Sciences Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2002).*
|
|
|
10.10
|
Orbital Sciences Corporation Nonqualified Management Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the company's Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).*
|
|
|
10.11
|
Executive Relocation Agreement dated as of August 7, 2003, by and between Orbital Sciences Corporation and Ronald J. Grabe, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Launch Systems Group (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003).*
|
|
|
10.12
|
First Amendment to Executive Relocation Agreement dated as of April 28, 2005, by and between Orbital Sciences Corporation and Ronald J. Grabe, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Launch Systems Group (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2005).*
|
|
|
10.13
|
Amended and Restated Executive Severance Agreement dated as of November 30, 2007, by and between Orbital Sciences Corporation and Garrett E. Pierce (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 4, 2007).*
|
|
|
10.14
|
Form of Director and Executive Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).*
|
|
|
10.15
|
Form of Amended and Restated Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012).*
|
|
|
10.16
|
Contract No. NNJ09GA02B for ISS Commercial Resupply Services dated December 23, 2008, by and between Orbital Sciences Corporation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).**
|
|
|
10.17
|
Task Order No.1 for Contract NNJ09GA02B for ISS Commercial Resupply Services dated December 23, 2008, by and between Orbital Sciences Corporation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).**
|
|
|
10.18
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement under the 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).*
|
|
|
10.19
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Unit Agreement under the 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2007).*
|
|
|
10.20
|
Form of Stock Unit Agreement under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2005).*
|
|
|
10.21
|
Form of Stock Unit Agreement under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (version 2) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 29, 2012).*
|
|
|
10.22
|
Form of Stock Unit Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2012).*
|
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith)
|
|
|
23
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (filed herewith).
|
|
| 31.1 |
Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
32.1
|
Written Statement of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
32.2
|
Written Statement of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
101.INS†
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
|
101.SCH†
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
|
101.CAL†
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
|
101.LAB†
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase
|
|
|
101.PRE†
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
|
|
101.DEF†
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
______________________
| * | Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement. |
| ** | Certain portions of this Exhibit were omitted by means of redacting a portion of the text in accordance with Rule 0-6 or Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
| † | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
82