UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended: May 5, 2007

or

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 1-13113

SAKS INCORPORATED

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

TENNESSEE	1-13113	62-0331040
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

12 East 49th Street New York, New York	10017
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

212-940-5305

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

750 Lakeshore Parkway

Birmingham, Alabama 35211

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  x    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of May 15, 2007, the number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding was 142,357,014.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – May 5, 2007, February 3, 2007 and April 29, 2006	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income – Three Months Ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three months ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006	5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	39
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	39
Item 1A. Risk Factors	39
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39
Item 6. Exhibits	40
SIGNATURES	41

2

SAKS INCORPORATED and SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	May 5, 2007		February 3, 2007		April 29, 2006
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	158,325	$	277,883	$	1,152,216
Merchandise inventories		811,577		785,302		853,929
Other current assets		133,700		146,893		177,817
Deferred income taxes, net		28,359		40,763		37,846
Total current assets		1,131,961		1,250,841		2,221,808
Property and Equipment, net		1,095,218		1,099,331		1,317,551
Goodwill and Intangibles, net		317		324		4,510
Deferred Income Taxes, net		142,438		152,754		136,238
Other Assets		40,937		41,053		42,132
TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,410,871	$	2,544,303	$	3,722,239
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Trade accounts payable	$	236,826	$	231,038	$	250,164
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		259,654		382,346		449,211
Dividend payable		3,813		12,729		547,560
Current portion of long-term debt		235,757		236,667		7,576
Total current liabilities		736,050		862,780		1,254,511
Long-Term Debt		351,428		450,010		686,335
Other Long-Term Liabilities		177,399		135,374		188,204
Total liabilities		1,264,877		1,448,164		2,129,050
Commitments and Contingencies		—		—		—
Shareholders’ Equity		1,145,994		1,096,139		1,593,189
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	2,410,871	$	2,544,303	$	3,722,239

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

SAKS INCORPORATED and SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	May 5, 2007			April 29, 2006
NET SALES	$	792,747		$	684,129
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization)		464,467			401,271
Gross margin		328,280			282,858
Selling, general and administrative expenses		212,845			184,889
Other operating expenses:
Property and equipment rentals		28,337			28,215
Depreciation and amortization		31,798			30,717
Taxes other than income taxes		22,220			22,369
Store pre-opening costs		136			172
Impairments and dispositions		384			4,330
OPERATING INCOME		32,560			12,166
Interest expense		(11,980	)		(14,045	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(5,222	)		—
Other income, net		2,835			8,819
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		18,193			6,940
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		7,156			(4,720	)
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		11,037			11,660
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
Income from discontinued operations (including gain on disposal of $205,443)		—			208,992
Provision for income taxes		—			142,754
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		—			66,238
NET INCOME	$	11,037		$	77,898
Per-Share amounts—Basic
Income from continuing operations	$	0.08		$	0.09
Income from discontinued operations	$	—		$	0.49
Net Income	$	0.08		$	0.58
Per-Share Amounts—Diluted
Income from continuing operations	$	0.07		$	0.09
Income from discontinued operations	$	—		$	0.49
Net Income	$	0.07		$	0.57
Weighted average common shares:
Basic		140,242			134,260
Diluted		156,274			136,097

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

SAKS INCORPORATED and SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	May 5, 2007			April 29, 2006
Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	11,037		$	77,898
Income from discontinued operations		—			66,238
Income from continuing operations		11,037			11,660
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		31,798			30,717
Impairments and dispositions		384			4,330
Equity compensation		1,194			5,534
Deferred income taxes		3,514			112,301
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		(5,186	)		(2,310	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		5,222			—
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net		(53,777	)		(364	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities—Continuing Operations		(5,814	)		161,868
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities—Discontinued Operations		—			(116,914	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities		(5,814	)		44,954
Investing Activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(32,019	)		(13,849	)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		266			133
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities—Continuing Operations		(31,753	)		(13,716	)
Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities—Discontinued Operations		—			1,025,363
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities		(31,753	)		1,011,647
Financing Activities:
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations		(103,889	)		(1,695	)
Cash dividends paid		(6,340	)		(680	)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		5,186			2,310
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		23,052			15,613
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities—Continuing Operations		(81,991	)		15,548
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities—Discontinued Operations		—			(333	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities		(81,991	)		15,215
Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents		(119,558	)		1,071,816
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		277,883			77,312
Plus: Cash and cash equivalents included in assets held for sale at beginning of year		—			3,088
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	158,325		$	1,152,216

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – GENERAL

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Operating results for the three months ended May 5, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending February 2, 2008 (fiscal year 2007). The financial statements include the accounts of Saks Incorporated and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany amounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at February 3, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2007.

ORGANIZATION

Saks Incorporated and its subsidiaries’ (together the “Company”) operations consist of Saks Fifth Avenue (SFA), Off Fifth, and Club Libby Lu. Previously, the Company also operated Saks Department Store Group (“SDSG”), which consisted of Proffitt’s and McRae’s (“Proffitt’s”) (sold to Belk, Inc. (“Belk”) in July 2005), the Northern Department Store Group (“NDSG”) (operated under the nameplates of Bergner’s, Boston Store, Carson Pirie Scott, Herberger’s and Younkers and sold to The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (“Bon-Ton”) in March 2006), and Parisian (sold to Belk in October 2006). The sold businesses are presented as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of income and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the prior year periods and are discussed at Note 2 “Discontinued Operations.”

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Net Sales – Net sales include sales of merchandise (net of returns and exclusive of sales taxes), commissions from leased departments, and shipping and handling revenues related to merchandise sold. Commissions from leased departments were $7,123 and $6,486 for the three months ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively. Leased department sales were $50,267 and $46,215 for the three months ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively, and were excluded from net sales.

6

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of cash on hand in the stores, deposits with banks, and investments with banks and financial institutions that have original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents totaled $142,293 and $1,135,000 at May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively, primarily consisting of money market funds, demand and time deposits. Income earned on cash equivalents was $2,711 and $8,644 for the three-month period ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively, and is reflected in Other Income.

Income Taxes – The effective income tax rate for the three-month period ended May 5, 2007 was 39.4% as compared to a credit of 68.0% for continuing operations for the three-month period ended April 29, 2006. The increase in the effective rate for the three-month period ended May 5, 2007 was primarily the result of a benefit recognized during the three-month period ended April 29, 2006 to reduce tax reserves resulting from the settlement of certain state tax examinations as well as other state tax benefits related to the divestiture of certain business units.

For discontinued operations, the effective income tax rate for the three-month period ended April 29, 2006 was 68.0%. This effective income tax rate was higher than the expected rate due to the write-off of goodwill related to the sale of NDSG.

Components of the Company’s income tax expense for the three-month period ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	May 5, 2007			April 29, 2006
Continuing Operations:
Expected federal income taxes at 35%	$	6,368		$	2,429
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		818			(4,211	)
Effect of settling tax exams and other tax reserve adjustments		(121	)		(2,450	)
Other items, net		91			(488	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	7,156		$	(4,720	)
Discontinued Operations:
Expected federal income taxes at 35%	$	—		$	73,147
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		—			18,415
Non-deductible goodwill		—			51,192
Provision for income taxes	$	—		$	142,754

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) effective as of the beginning of fiscal year 2007. As a result of the implementation the Company recorded a $33,672 decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits which was accounted for as an increase to the beginning shareholder’s equity. As of

7

February 4, 2007 the Company had total gross unrecognized tax benefits of $43,956. Of this total, $12,575 represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.

It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease in the next twelve months as a result of settling uncertain tax positions. However, the Company does not anticipate this to result in any material change to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits.

As a result of the analysis of unrecognized tax benefits (due to the adoption of FIN 48), the net deferred tax asset related to the state net operating loss carryforwards increased. Therefore, the company performed a valuation allowance analysis to determine the realization of this asset. This analysis resulted in an additional valuation allowance of $19,258 with the offset recorded to shareholder’s equity in accordance with Statement of Position 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code.” The Company is under the provisions of Statement of Position 90-7 for these net operating losses since they were acquired through the acquisition of a company that had previously filed bankruptcy.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company has approximately $2,443 in interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits accrued as of February 4, 2007.

The Company files a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return as well as state tax returns in multiple state jurisdictions. The Company has completed examinations by the Internal Revenue Service for taxable years through January 29, 2005 with no significant adjustments. With respect to the state and local jurisdictions, the Company has completed examinations in many jurisdictions through the same period and currently has examinations in progress for several jurisdictions.

NOTE 2 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On March 6, 2006, the Company sold to Bon-Ton all outstanding equity interests of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries that owned NDSG (operating under the nameplates of Bergner’s, Boston Store, Carson Pirie Scott, Herberger’s and Younkers), either directly or indirectly. The consideration received consisted of approximately $1,115,000 in cash (reduced as described below based on changes in working capital), plus the assumption by Bon-Ton of approximately $35,000 of unfunded benefits liabilities and approximately $35,000 of capital leases. A working capital adjustment based on working capital as of the effective time of the transaction reduced the amount of cash proceeds by approximately $75,000 resulting in net cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $1,040,000. The disposition included NDSG’s operations consisting of, among other things, the following: the real and personal property, operating leases and inventory associated with 142 NDSG units (31 Carson Pirie Scott stores, 14 Bergner’s stores, 10 Boston Store stores, 40 Herberger’s stores, and 47 Younkers stores), administrative/headquarters facilities in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and distribution centers located in Rockford, Illinois, Naperville, Illinois, Green Bay, Wisconsin, and Ankeny, Iowa. NDSG stores generated fiscal year 2005 revenues of approximately $2,168,000. The Company realized a net gain of $204,729 on the sale.

8

Bon-Ton entered into a Transition Service Agreement with the Company (“NDSG TSA”), whereby the Company continued to provide, for varying transition periods, back office services related to the NDSG operations. The back-office services included certain information technology, telecommunications, credit, accounting and store planning services, among others. Bon-Ton compensated the Company for these services, as outlined in the NDSG TSA. The results of the NDSG operations are reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for all periods presented.

On October 2, 2006, the Company sold to Belk of all of the outstanding equity interests of the Company’s subsidiaries that conducted the Parisian business. The consideration received consisted of approximately $285,000 in cash (increased in accordance with a working capital adjustment). A working capital adjustment based on working capital as of the effective time of the transaction increased the amount of cash proceeds by approximately $14,200. In addition, Belk reimbursed the Company at closing for approximately $6,700 in capital expenditures incurred in connection with the construction of four new Parisian stores. Belk also paid the Company a premium associated with the purchase of accounts and accounts receivable from Household Bank (SB), N.A. (now known as HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., “HSBC”), in the amount of approximately $2,300. The foregoing resulted in total net cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $308,200.

The disposition included Parisian’s operations consisting of, among other things, the following: real and personal property, operating leases and inventory associated with 38 Parisian stores (which generated fiscal year 2005 revenues of approximately $740,000), a 125,000 square foot administrative/headquarters facility in Birmingham, Alabama and a 180,000 square foot distribution center located in Steele, Alabama. The Company realized a net loss of $12,811 on the sale.

In connection with the consummation of the Parisian transaction, the Company entered into a Transition Services Agreement with Belk (“Parisian TSA”). Pursuant to the Parisian TSA, the Company provided, for varying transition periods, back-office services related to the Company’s former Parisian specialty department store business. The back-office services included information technology, telecommunications, credit, accounting and store planning services, among others. The results of the Parisian operations are reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for all periods presented.

Net sales of the aforementioned businesses that are included within discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended April 29, 2006 are $355,624.

NOTE 3 – EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Calculations of earnings per common share (“EPS”) for the three months ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 are as follows (income and shares in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended May 5, 2007						For the Three Months Ended April 29, 2006
	Net Income		Weighted Average Shares	Per Share Amount			Net Income		Weighted Average Shares	Per Share Amount
Basic EPS	$	11,037	140,242	$	0.08		$	77,898	134,260	$	0.58
Effect of dilutive stock options and convertible debentures			16,032		(0.01	)			1,837		(0.01	)
Diluted EPS	$	11,037	156,274	$	0.07		$	77,898	136,097	$	0.57

9

The Company had 271 and 3,386 option awards of potentially dilutive common stock outstanding at May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period. There were also 19,219 and 12,307 of potentially exercisable shares under the convertible notes at May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS due to the assumption of net share settlement as discussed below (See Note 4). Additionally, included in the computation of diluted EPS are 14,295 shares of potentially dilutive shares associated with shares the Company would issue to settle the difference between the fair value and the par value of the convertible notes upon conversion and the shares to be issued upon the exercise of a call option the Company sold at the time of issuance of the convertible debentures.

The Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus, EITF 04-08, “The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings Per Share,” whereby the contingent conversion provisions should be ignored and therefore an issuer should apply the if-converted method in calculating diluted earnings per share. This consensus became effective for periods ending after December 15, 2004, and requires retroactive application to all periods presented. Although the Company is now required to ignore the contingent conversion provision on its convertible notes under EITF 04-08, it can still presume that it will satisfy the net share settlement of the par value upon conversion of the notes in cash, and thus exclude the effect of the conversion of the notes in its calculation of diluted earnings per share. However, the FASB is contemplating an amendment to SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” that would require the Company to ignore the cash presumption of net share settlement and to assume share settlement for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share.

NOTE 4 – DEBT AND SHARE ACTIVITY

At the Company’s request, due to the sale of NDSG, the revolving credit facility was reduced from $800,000 to $500,000 in March 2006. In September 2006, the maturity date of the revolving credit facility was extended to September 2011.

During June 2006, the Company repurchased a total of approximately $193 in principal amount of senior notes. The repurchase of these notes resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $7.

10

On April 3, 2007, the Company gave notice that holders of its $230,000 2.0% convertible senior unsecured notes due March 15, 2024 were entitled to convert the convertible notes into shares of the Company’s common stock due to the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeded 120% of the convertible senior notes’ conversion price for at least 20 out of the last 30 consecutive trading days in the first calendar quarter of 2007. The Company gave notice on April 3, 2007 that the holders of the convertible notes could convert them into shares of the Company’s common stock until June 30, 2007 in accordance with, and subject to, the terms of the convertible notes indenture. Since the holders of the convertible notes have the ability to exercise their conversion rights, the convertible notes were classified within “current portion of long-term debt” on the Company’s May 5, 2007 balance sheet. As of June 1, 2007, no note holders had converted their notes into the Company’s common stock.

On April 12, 2007, the Company announced final results of its modified “Dutch Auction” tender offer to purchase a portion of its 8 1/4% senior notes due November 15, 2008 for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $100,000 (the “offer cap”). The offer expired on April 11, 2007. The aggregate principal amount of notes validly tendered at or above the clearing spread exceeded the offer cap, and the Company accepted $95,872 aggregate principal amount of the notes, resulting in an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 (plus an additional $3,230 in aggregate accrued interest on such notes). The Company accepted for purchase first, all notes tendered at spreads above the clearing spread, and thereafter, the notes validly tendered at the clearing spread on a prorated basis according to the principal amount of such notes. The Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $5,222 related to the repurchase of the notes in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of income.

During the three months ended May 5, 2007, the Company did not purchase any shares of the Company’s common stock. At May 5, 2007, there were 37,380 shares remaining available for repurchase under the Company’s existing share repurchase program.

NOTE 5 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company sponsors a defined benefit cash balance pension plan for many employees of the Company. In conjunction with the sale of NDSG, the Company sold to Bon-Ton the assets, and Bon-Ton assumed the liabilities, of the Carson cash balance pension plan. The Company generally funds pension costs currently, subject to regulatory funding requirements. The components of net periodic pension expense related to the Company’s remaining pension plan for the three months ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	May 5, 2007			April 29, 2006
Service cost	$	331		$	1,200
Interest cost		1,838			2,095
Expected return on plan assets		(2,782	)		(2,324	)
Net amortization of losses and prior service costs		813			935
Net periodic pension expense	$	200		$	1,906

11

The Company expects minimal or no funding requirements in 2007 and 2008.

NOTE 6 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On October 3, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $4.00 per common share totaling approximately $558,600, and the Company reduced shareholders’ equity by that amount. Approximately $552,000 of the dividend was paid on November 30, 2006 to shareholders of record as of November 15, 2006. The remaining portion of the dividend payable will be paid prospectively as, and to the extent, awards of restricted stock and performance shares vest.

On March 6, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $4.00 per common share totaling approximately $547,500, and the Company reduced shareholders’ equity by that amount. Approximately $539,000 of the dividend was paid on May 1, 2006 to shareholders of record as of April 14, 2006. The remaining portion of the dividend payable will be paid prospectively as, and to the extent, awards of restricted stock and performance shares vest.

The following table summarizes the changes in shareholders’ equity for the three months ended May 5, 2007:

	Common Stock Shares		Common Stock Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance at February 3, 2007	140,440		$	14,048		$	1,097,817		$	12,620		$	(28,346	)	$	1,096,139
Adoption of FIN 48							36,528			(2,856	)					33,672
Increase valuation allowance							(19,258	)								(19,258	)
Net income										11,037						11,037
Dividend adjustment—canceled restricted shares							2,576									2,576
Issuance of common stock	1,611			161			22,891									23,052
Income tax benefit related to																—
employee stock plans							3,295									3,295
Net activity under stock compensation plans	486			49			(49	)								—
Restricted shares withheld for taxes	(231	)		(27	)		(5,686	)								(5,713	)
Stock-based compensation							1,194									1,194
Balance at May 5, 2007	142,306		$	14,231		$	1,139,308		$	20,801		$	(28,346	)	$	1,145,994

NOTE 7 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company maintains an equity stock plan for the granting of options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted stock, and other forms of equity awards to employees and directors. Options granted generally vest over a four-year period after grant and have an exercise life of seven to ten years from the grant date. Restricted stock and performance shares generally vest one to ten years after the grant date, although applicable plans permit accelerated vesting in certain circumstances at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.

12

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments.” This statement, referred to as “SFAS No. 123R,” revised SFAS No. 123, and requires companies to expense the value of employee stock options and similar awards. Effective January 29, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R. The adoption of this standard had an immaterial effect on the Company’s fiscal year 2006 consolidated financial statements. Total stock-based compensation expense resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, net of related tax effects, for the three-month period ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 was approximately $716 and $2,933, respectively.

The Company adopted the alternative transition method, as permitted by FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards,” to calculate the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123R for these awards that were outstanding upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R. The alternative transition method allows the use of simplified methods to calculate the beginning capital-in-excess-of-par pool and the consolidated statements of cash flows. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash inflows in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 00-15, “Classification in the Statements of Cash Flows of the Income Tax Benefit Received by a Company upon Exercise of a Nonqualified Employee Stock Option.” SFAS No. 123R requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options to be classified as financing cash inflows rather than operating cash inflows, on a prospective basis. This amount is shown as “Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation.”

As of May 5, 2007, the Company had unearned compensation amounts related to restricted stock of $16,214, included in Additional Paid-In Capital, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of less than 3 years.

NOTE 8 – CONTINGENCIES

LEGAL CONTINGENCIES

Investigations

At management’s request, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors conducted an internal investigation in 2004 and 2005. In 2004, the Company informed the SEC of the Audit Committee’s internal investigation. Thereafter, the Company was informed by the SEC that it issued a formal order of private investigation. Thereafter, the Company was informed that the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York had instituted an inquiry. The Company believes that the subject of these inquiries includes one or more of the matters that were the subject of the investigations by the Audit Committee and possibly includes related matters. The results of the Audit Committee’s internal investigation have been previously disclosed by the Company. The Company has responded to subpoenas and other requests for information from the SEC, including a subpoena requesting information concerning, among other items, the Company’s allocation to vendors of a portion of markdown costs associated with certain of the Company’s customer loyalty and other promotional activities, as well as

13

information concerning markdowns, earnings, and other financial data for 1999-2003. The Company is continuing to fully cooperate with the SEC and the Office of the United States Attorney, whose investigations the Company understands are continuing.

Vendor Litigation

On May 17, 2005, International Design Concepts, LLC (“IDC”) commenced litigation against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York raising various claims, including breach of contract, fraud and unjust enrichment. The suit alleges that from 1996 to 2003 the Company improperly took chargebacks and deductions for vendor markdowns, which resulted in IDC going out of business. The suit seeks damages in the amount of the unauthorized chargebacks and deductions. IDC filed a second amended complaint on June 14, 2005 asserting an additional claim for damages under the Uniform Commercial Code for vendor compliance chargebacks.

On October 25, 2005 the Chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Kleinert’s Inc. filed a complaint against the Company and several of its subsidiaries in the United States Bankruptcy. Court for the Southern District of New York. In its initial complaint the plaintiff, as assignee, alleged breach of contract, fraud, and unjust enrichment, among other causes of action, and seeks compensatory and punitive damages due to the Company’s assessment of alleged improper chargebacks against Kleinert’s Inc. totaling approximately $4 million which wrongful acts the plaintiff alleges caused the insolvency and bankruptcy of Kleinert’s Inc. On August 15, 2006 the plaintiff, as assignee, filed an amended complaint in which it asserts the following claims, among others: (1) defendants applied improper chargebacks to the accounts payable of Kleinert’s, which led to the extreme financial distress and Kleinert’s eventual bankruptcy and Kleinert’s incurred liabilities and lost profits of at least $100,000 and plaintiff requests punitive damages of no less than $50,000 (conversion claim); (2) from 1998- 2003 defendants charged back an amount not less than $4,000 to Kleinert’s and these chargebacks improperly benefited the defendants, and plaintiff requests $4,000 on this claim (unjust enrichment claim); (3) defendants falsely represented that its $4,000 in chargebacks were proper and Kleinert’s reliance on defendants’ misrepresentations caused Kleinert’s to lose not less than $4,000 and caused it to file for bankruptcy resulting in liabilities and lost profits of $100,000, and plaintiff requests punitive damages of no less than $50,000 (fraud claim); (4) defendants wrongfully charged back at least $4,000 and these unwarranted chargebacks assisted Kleinert’s officers and directors in booking fictitious sales revenue and accounts receivable and perpetrating a fraud on Kleinert’s lenders in excess of $25,000, and plaintiff requests punitive damages of no less than $50,000 (fraud claim); (5) defendants used dishonest, improper and unfair means in conducting business with Kleinert’s and interfered with Kleinert’s relationship with its lenders (tortious interference with prospective economic advantage claim); (6) defendants assisted officers of Kleinert’s in breaching their fiduciary duties to Kleinert’s and to its creditors by falsifying borrowing base certificates given to the lenders, and defendants knew that their improper chargeback scheme was assisting these breaches of fiduciary duty by Kleinert’s officers, with respect to which plaintiff requests $100,000 plus $50,000 in punitive damages (aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty claim); (7) defendants knew that their improper chargeback scheme was assisting the perpetration of fraud by Kleinert’s officers, and plaintiff requests $100,000 plus $50,000 in punitive damages (aiding and abetting fraud claim); and (8) various fraudulent conveyance claims with respect to which plaintiff requests damages of $4,000.

14

On December 8, 2005 Adamson Apparel, Inc. filed a purported class action lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. In its complaint the plaintiff asserts breach of contract claims and alleges that the Company improperly assessed chargebacks, timely payment discounts, and deductions for merchandise returns against members of the plaintiff class. The lawsuit seeks compensatory and incidental damages and restitution.

Other

The Company is involved in legal proceedings arising from its normal business activities and has accruals for losses where appropriate. Management believes that none of these legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

NOTE 9 – NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that currently are not required to be measured at fair value. This Statement is effective no later than fiscal years beginning on or after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard may have on its financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This interpretation clarifies the application of Statement 109 by defining a criterion that an individual tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. For a benefit to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The benefit to be recognized for a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and disclosure. The Company adopted FIN 48 as of February 4, 2007.

The FASB is contemplating an amendment to SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” that would require the Company to ignore the cash presumption of net share settlement and to assume share settlement for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share. Although the Company is now required to ignore the contingent conversion provision on its convertible notes under EITF 04-08, it can still presume that it will satisfy the net share settlement of the par value upon conversion of the notes in cash, and thus exclude the effect of the conversion of the notes in its calculation of diluted earnings per share. If and when the FASB amends SFAS No. 128, the effect of the changes would require the Company to use the if-converted method in calculating diluted earnings per share except when the effect would be anti-dilutive. The effect of adopting the amendment to SFAS No. 128 would increase the number of shares in the Company’s diluted calculation by 19,219 shares.

15

During September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or a liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under SFAS No. 157, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this Statement and does not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS No. 158”). The Company adopted SFAS No. 158 prospectively on February 3, 2007. SFAS No. 158 requires an employer that sponsors one or more defined benefit pension plans or other postretirement plans to 1) recognize the funded status of a plan, measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation, in the balance sheet; 2) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost; 3) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end balance sheet; and 4) disclose in the notes to the financial statements additional information about the effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition assets or obligations. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 will require the Company to change the measurement date for the assets and liabilities of its employee benefit plans from November 1 to the Company’s fiscal year end beginning with the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009.

NOTE 10 – STORE DISPOSITIONS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES

The Company continuously evaluates its real estate portfolio and closes underproductive stores in the normal course of business as leases expire or as other circumstances indicate. The Company also performs an asset impairment analysis at each fiscal year end. During the three months ended May 5, 2007, the Company incurred net charges of $384 primarily related to asset impairments in the normal course of business. During the three months ended April 29, 2006, the Company incurred net charges of $4,330 primarily related to asset impairments in the normal course of business. Asset impairments are included in Impairments and Dispositions in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. There was a $255 payable related to these charges at May 5, 2007.

During the three months ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, the Company incurred expenses of approximately $22,571 and $6,712, respectively, for severance, retention and transition costs in connection with the Company downsizing following the disposition of its SDSG businesses (discussed in Note 2). Severance, retention and transition costs are included in Selling, General & Administrative Expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. There was a $16,394 payable related to these charges at May 5, 2007.

16

NOTE 11 – CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following tables present condensed consolidating financial information for: (1) Saks Incorporated and (2) on a combined basis, the guarantors of Saks Incorporated’s senior notes (which are all of the wholly owned subsidiaries of Saks Incorporated).

The condensed consolidating financial statements presented as of and for the three-month periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 and as of February 3, 2007 reflect the legal entity compositions at the respective dates.

Separate financial statements of the guarantor subsidiaries are not presented because the guarantors are jointly, severally, fully and unconditionally liable under the guarantees. Borrowings and the related interest expense under the Company’s revolving credit agreement are allocated to Saks Incorporated and the guarantor subsidiaries under an intercompany revolving credit arrangement. There are also management and royalty fee arrangements among Saks Incorporated and the subsidiaries. At May 5, 2007, Saks Incorporated was the sole obligor for a majority of the Company’s long-term debt and maintained a small group of corporate employees.

17

SAKS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS AT MAY 5, 2007

(Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

	Saks Incorporated		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	142,293	$	16,032				$	158,325
Merchandise inventories				811,577					811,577
Other current assets				133,700					133,700
Deferred income taxes, net				28,359					28,359
Total Current Assets		142,293		989,668		—			1,131,961
Property and Equipment, net				1,095,218					1,095,218
Goodwill and Intangibles, net				317					317
Deferred Income Taxes, net				142,438					142,438
Other Assets		10,185		30,752					40,937
Investment in and Advances to Subsidiaries		1,523,061			$	(1,523,061	)
Total Assets	$	1,675,539	$	2,258,393	$	(1,523,061	)	$	2,410,871
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Trade accounts payable			$	236,826				$	236,826
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	8,999		250,655					259,654
Dividend payable		3,813							3,813
Current portion of long-term debt		230,000		5,757					235,757
Total Current Liabilities		242,812		493,238		—			736,050
Long-Term Debt		286,733		64,695					351,428
Other Long-Term Liabilities				177,399					177,399
Investment by and Advances from Parent				1,523,061	$	(1,523,061	)
Shareholders’ Equity		1,145,994							1,145,994
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	1,675,539	$	2,258,393	$	(1,523,061	)	$	2,410,871

18

SAKS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 5, 2007

(Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

	Saks Incorporated			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales				$	792,747					$	792,747
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales					464,467						464,467
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	1,631			211,214						212,845
Other operating expenses		33			82,322						82,355
Store pre-opening costs					136						136
Impairments and dispositions					384						384
Operating income (loss)		(1,664	)		34,224			—			32,560
Other income (expense)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		19,209					$	(19,209	)
Interest expense		(9,771	)		(2,209	)					(11,980	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(5,222	)								(5,222	)
Other income, net		2,835									2,835
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes		5,387			32,015			(19,209	)		18,193
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(5,650	)		12,806						7,156
Net income	$	11,037		$	19,209		$	(19,209	)	$	11,037

19

SAKS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 5, 2007

(Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

	Saks Incorporated			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income	$	11,037		$	19,209		$	(19,209	)	$	11,037
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(19,209	)					19,209
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options		(5,186	)								(5,186	)
Depreciation and amortization					31,798						31,798
Equity compensation		1,194									1,194
Deferred income taxes					3,514						3,514
Impairments and dispositions					384						384
Loss on extinguishment of debt		5,222									5,222
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net		(2,839	)		(50,938	)					(53,777	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities		(9,781	)		3,967			—			(5,814	)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment					(32,019	)					(32,019	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets					266						266
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities		—			(31,753	)		—			(31,753	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Intercompany borrowings, contributions and distributions		(35,332	)		35,332
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations		(100,000	)		(3,889	)					(103,889	)
Payment of dividend		(6,340	)								(6,340	)
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options		5,186									5,186
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		23,052									23,052
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities		(113,434	)		31,443			—			(81,991	)
Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents		(123,215	)		3,657			—			(119,558	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period		265,508			12,375						277,883
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period	$	142,293		$	16,032			—		$	158,325

20

SAKS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS AT APRIL 29, 2006

(Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

	Saks Incorporated		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,134,632	$	17,584				$	1,152,216
Merchandise inventories				853,929					853,929
Other current assets				177,817					177,817
Deferred income taxes, net				37,846					37,846
Total Current Assets		1,134,632		1,087,176		—			2,221,808
Property and Equipment, net				1,317,551					1,317,551
Goodwill and Intangibles, net				4,510					4,510
Deferred Income Taxes, net				136,238					136,238
Other Assets		13,031		29,101					42,132
Investment in and Advances to Subsidiaries		1,070,879			$	(1,070,879	)
Total Assets	$	2,218,542	$	2,574,576	$	(1,070,879	)	$	3,722,239
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Trade accounts payable			$	250,164				$	250,164
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	12,812		983,959					996,771
Current portion of long-term debt				7,576					7,576
Total Current Liabilities		12,812		1,241,699		—			1,254,511
Long-Term Debt		612,351		73,984					686,335
Other Long-Term Liabilities		190		188,014					188,204
Investment by and Advances from Parent				1,070,879	$	(1,070,879	)
Shareholders’ Equity		1,593,189							1,593,189
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	2,218,542	$	2,574,576	$	(1,070,879	)	$	3,722,239

21

SAKS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 29, 2006

(Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

	Saks Incorporated			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales				$	684,129					$	684,129
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales					401,271						401,271
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	1,464			183,425						184,889
Other operating expenses		32			81,269						81,301
Store pre-opening costs					172						172
Impairments and dispositions					4,330						4,330
Operating income (loss)		(1,496	)		13,662			—			12,166
Other income (expense)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		5,857					$	(5,857	)
Interest expense		(10,145	)		(3,900	)					(14,045	)
Other income, net		8,819									8,819
Income from continuing operations before provision (benefit) for income taxes		3,035			9,762			(5,857	)		6,940
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(8,625	)		3,905						(4,720	)
Income from continuing operations		11,660			5,857			(5,857	)		11,660
Discontinued operations:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries - discontinued operations
(net of tax)		66,238						(66,238	)
Income from discontinued operations (including gain on disposal of $205,443)					208,992						208,992
Provision for income taxes					142,754						142,754
Income from discontinued operations		66,238			66,238			(66,238	)		66,238
Net income	$	77,898		$	72,095		$	(72,095	)	$	77,898

22

SAKS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 29, 2006

(Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

	Saks Incorporated			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	77,898		$	72,095		$	(72,095	)	$	77,898
Income from discontinued operations		66,238			66,238			(66,238	)		66,238
Income from continuing operations		11,660			5,857			(5,857	)		11,660
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(5,857	)					5,857			0
Depreciation and amortization					30,717						30,717
Equity compensation		5,534									5,534
Deferred income taxes					112,301						112,301
Impairments and dispositions					4,330						4,330
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		(2,310	)								(2,310	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net		(541,135	)		540,771						(364	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities - Continuing Operations		(532,108	)		693,976			—			161,868
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities - Discontinued Operations					(116,914	)					(116,914	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities		(532,108	)		577,062			—			44,954
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment					(13,849	)					(13,849	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets					133						133
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities - Continuing Operations		—			(13,716	)		—			(13,716	)
Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities - Discontinued Operations					1,025,363						1,025,363
Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities		—			1,011,647			—			1,011,647
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Intercompany borrowings, contributions and distributions		1,603,497			(1,603,497	)
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations					(1,695	)					(1,695	)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		2,310									2,310
Cash dividends paid		(680	)								(680	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		15,613									15,613
Net Cash Provided By (Used) In Financing Activities - Continuing Operations		1,620,740			(1,605,192	)		—			15,548
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities - Discontinued Operations					(333	)					(333	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities		1,620,740			(1,605,525	)		—			15,215
Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents		1,088,632			(16,816	)					1,071,816
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period		46,000			31,312						77,312
Less: Cash and Cash Equivalents included in assets held for sale at end of year					3,088						3,088
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period	$	1,134,632		$	17,584			—		$	1,152,216

23

SAKS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS AT FEBRUARY 3, 2007

(Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

	Saks Incorporated		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	265,508	$	12,375				$	277,883
Merchandise inventories				785,302					785,302
Other current assets				146,893					146,893
Deferred income taxes, net				40,763					40,763
Total Current Assets		265,508		985,333		—			1,250,841
Property and Equipment, net				1,099,331					1,099,331
Goodwill and Intangibles, net				324					324
Deferred Income Taxes, net				152,754					152,754
Other Assets		11,126		29,927					41,053
Investment in and Advances to Subsidiaries		1,454,660			$	(1,454,660	)
Total Assets	$	1,731,294	$	2,267,669	$	(1,454,660	)	$	2,544,303
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Trade accounts payable			$	231,038				$	231,038
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	22,552		372,523					395,075
Current portion of long-term debt		230,000		6,667					236,667
Total Current Liabilities		252,552		610,228		—			862,780
Long-Term Debt		382,336		67,674					450,010
Other Long-Term Liabilities		267		135,107					135,374
Investment by and Advances from Parent				1,454,660	$	(1,454,660	)
Shareholders’ Equity		1,096,139							1,096,139
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	1,731,294	$	2,267,669	$	(1,454,660	)	$	2,544,303

24

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to provide an analytical view of the business from management’s perspective and has four major components:

• Management’s Overview

• Results of Operations

• Liquidity and Capital Resources

• Critical Accounting Policies

MD&A should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report.

MANAGEMENT’S OVERVIEW

GENERAL

Saks Incorporated and its subsidiaries’ (together the “Company”) operations consist of Saks Fifth Avenue (“SFA”), Off Fifth, and Club Libby Lu (“CLL”). Previously, the Company also operated Saks Department Store Group (“SDSG”), which consisted of Proffitt’s and McRae’s (“Proffitt’s”) (sold to Belk, Inc. (“Belk”) in July 2005), the Northern Department Store Group (“NDSG”) (operated under the nameplates of Bergner’s, Boston Store, Carson Pirie Scott, Herberger’s and Younkers and sold to The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (“Bon-Ton”) in March 2006), and Parisian (sold to Belk in October 2006). The sold businesses are presented as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of income and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the prior year periods and are discussed below at “Discontinued Operations.”

SFA stores are principally free-standing stores in exclusive shopping destinations or anchor stores in upscale regional malls, and the stores typically offer a wide assortment of distinctive luxury fashion apparel, shoes, accessories, jewelry, cosmetics and gifts. Customers may also purchase SFA products offered in catalogs or online at www.saks.com. Off Fifth is intended to be the premier luxury off-price retailer in the United States and also provides an outlet for the sale of end-of-season clearance merchandise. Off Fifth stores are primarily located in upscale mixed-use and off-price centers and offer luxury apparel, shoes, accessories, cosmetics and decorative home furnishings, targeting the value-conscious customer. CLL consists of mall-based specialty stores, targeting girls aged 4-12 years old. As of May 5, 2007, Saks operated 54 SFA stores with 6.0 million square feet, 49 Off 5th units with 1.4 million square feet, and 89 CLL specialty stores, which includes 65 standalone stores and 24 store-in-stores in the former SDSG businesses, with 0.1 million square feet.

25

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On July 5, 2005, Belk acquired from the Company for $622.7 million in cash substantially all of the assets directly involved in the Company’s Proffitt’s business operations, plus the assumption of approximately $1 million in capitalized lease obligations and the assumption of certain other ordinary course liabilities associated with the acquired assets. The assets sold included the real and personal property and inventory associated with 22 Proffitt’s stores and 25 McRae’s stores that generated fiscal 2004 revenues of approximately $784 million. The Company realized a net gain of $155.5 million on the sale.

On March 6, 2006, the Company sold to Bon-Ton all outstanding equity interests of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries that owned NDSG, either directly or indirectly. The consideration received consisted of approximately $1.12 billion in cash (reduced as described below based on changes in working capital), plus the assumption by Bon-Ton of approximately $35 million of unfunded benefit liabilities and approximately $35 million of capital leases. A working capital adjustment based on working capital as of the effective time of the transaction reduced the amount of cash proceeds by approximately $75 million resulting in net cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.04 billion. The disposition included NDSG’s operations consisting of, among other things, the following: the real and personal property, operating leases and inventory associated with 142 NDSG units (31 Carson Pirie Scott stores, 14 Bergner’s stores, 10 Boston Store stores, 40 Herberger’s stores, and 47 Younkers stores), administrative/headquarters facilities in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and distribution centers located in Rockford, Illinois, Naperville, Illinois, Green Bay, Wisconsin, and Ankeny, Iowa. NDSG generated fiscal year 2005 revenues of approximately $2.2 billion. The Company realized a net gain of $204.7 million on the sale.

On October 2, 2006, the Company sold to Belk all of the outstanding equity interests of the Company’s subsidiaries that conducted the Parisian specialty department store business (“Parisian”). The consideration received consisted of $285.0 million in cash (increased in accordance with a working capital adjustment described below). In addition, Belk reimbursed the Company at closing for $6.7 million in capital expenditures incurred in connection with the construction of four new Parisian stores. Belk also paid the Company an additional amount associated with the purchase of accounts and accounts receivable from Household Bank (SB), N.A. (now known as HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., “HSBC”), in the amount of $2.3 million. A working capital adjustment based on working capital as of the effective time of the transaction increased the amount of cash proceeds by $14.2 million resulting in net cash proceeds of $308.2 million. The disposition included Parisian’s operations consisting of, among other things, the following: real and personal property, operating leases and inventory associated with 38 Parisian stores (which generated fiscal 2005 revenues of approximately $740 million), an administrative/headquarters facility in Birmingham, Alabama and a distribution center located in Steele, Alabama. The Company realized a net loss of $12.8 million on the sale.

26

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

The Company recorded net income of $11.0 million, or $0.07 per share for the three months ended May 5, 2007. For the three months ended April 29, 2006, income from continuing operations was $11.7 million, or $0.09 per share. After recognition of the Company’s after-tax income from discontinued operations of $66.2 million, or $0.49 per share, primarily related to the sale of the NDSG business, net income totaled $77.9 million, or $0.57 per share, for the first quarter ended April 29, 2006.

The three-month period ended May 5, 2007 included charges totaling $13.5 million (net of taxes), or $.09 per share, primarily related to retention, severance and transition costs as the Company downsizes its organizational structure following the disposition of its SDSG businesses. The current year first quarter also included legal and other expenses related to the investigations totaling approximately $1.0 million (net of taxes), or $0.01 per share and a loss on extinguishment of debt totaling $3.1 million (net of taxes), or $0.02 per share, related to the repurchase of $95.9 million of senior notes.

The three-month period ended April 29, 2006 included charges of $2.6 million (net of taxes), or $0.02 per share, primarily related to impairments and dispositions. The prior year first quarter also included approximately $4.0 million (net of taxes), or $0.03 per share, of severance and retention expenses, approximately $1.0 million (net of taxes), or $0.01 per share, of legal and other expenses related to the investigations, and income of $2.5 million (net of taxes), or $0.02 per share, related to the favorable conclusion of tax exams.

The Company believes that an understanding of its reported financial condition and results of operations is not complete without considering the effect of all other components of MD&A included herein.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table shows, for the periods indicated, items from the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as percentages of net sales. (numbers may not total due to rounding)

27

	Three Months Ended
	May 5, 2007		April 29, 2006
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization)	58.6	%	58.7	%
Selling, general & administrative expenses	26.8	%	27.0	%
Other operating expenses	10.4	%	11.9	%
Store pre-opening costs	0.0	%	0.0	%
Impairments and dispositions	0.0	%	0.6	%
Operating income	4.1	%	1.8	%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense	-1.5	%	-2.1	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt	-0.7	%	0.0	%
Other income, net	0.4	%	1.3	%
Income before income taxes	2.3	%	1.0	%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	0.9	%	-0.7	%
Income from continuing operations	1.4	%	1.7	%
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations
(including gain on disposal)	0.0	%	30.5	%
Provision for income taxes	0.0	%	20.9	%
Income from discontinued operations	0.0	%	9.7	%
Net income	1.4	%	11.4	%

28

THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 5, 2007 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 29, 2006

DISCUSSION OF OPERATING INCOME

The following table shows the changes in operating income from the three-month period ended April 29, 2006 to the three-month period ended May 5, 2007:

(In Millions)	Total Company
For the three months ended April 29, 2006	$	12.2
Store sales and margin		45.4
Operating expenses		(28.9	)
Impairments and dispositions		3.9
Increase		20.4
For the three months ended May 5, 2007	$	32.6

For the three-month period ended May 5, 2007, operating income improved to $32.6 million from operating income of $12.2 million for the three-month period ended April 29, 2006. The improvement in operating income for the quarter was driven by a 14.4% increase in comparable store sales and expense management which resulted in a 230 basis point improvement in the expense rate as a percent of sales. The gross margin rate also improved slightly for the quarter.

NET SALES

For the three months ended May 5, 2007, total sales increased 15.9% to $792.7 million from $684.1 million for the three months ended April 29, 2006. Similarly, consolidated comparable store sales increased 14.4% year-over-year. The net effect of sales from new and closed stores resulted in a $2.3 million reduction, while the net effect of the reopening of the New Orleans store resulted in a $14.2 million increase.

Comparable store sales are calculated on a rolling 13-month basis. Thus, to be included in the comparison, a store must be open for 13 months. The additional month is used to transition the first month impact of a new store opening. Correspondingly, closed stores are removed from the comparable store sales comparison when they begin liquidating merchandise. Expanded, remodeled and converted stores are included in the comparable store sales comparison, except for the periods in which they are closed for remodeling and renovation.

GROSS MARGIN

For the three months ended May 5, 2007, gross margin was $328.3 million, or 41.4% of net sales, compared to $282.9 million, or 41.3% of net sales, for the three months ended April 29, 2006. The improvement in gross margin dollars and the gross margin rate was

29

principally attributable to the higher sales driven by the strengthening of merchandise assortments by store and enhancements to the merchandise planning and allocation processes.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (“SG&A”)

For the three months ended May 5, 2007, SG&A was $212.8 million, or 26.8% of net sales, compared to $184.9 million, or 27.0% of net sales, for the three months ended April 29, 2006. The increase was driven by higher variable expenses associated with the 2007 first quarter $108.6 million sales increase and approximately $16 million of year-over-year incremental expenses that management does not expect to be long-term continuing obligations of the Company, primarily severance/retention and investigation-related expenses.

OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES

For the three months ended May 5, 2007, other operating expenses, including store pre-opening costs, were $82.5 million, or 10.4% of net sales, compared to $81.5 million, or 11.9% of net sales, for the three months ended April 29, 2006. This increase of $1.0 million was driven primarily by higher depreciation and amortization costs. As a percent of sales, other operating expenses decreased 150 basis points in 2007, reflecting the ability to leverage primarily fixed costs on the increased sales.

IMPAIRMENTS AND DISPOSITIONS

For the three months ended May 5, 2007, the Company realized losses from impairments and dispositions of $0.4 million, or 0.0% of net sales, compared to a loss of $4.3 million, or 0.6% of net sales, for the three months ended April 29, 2006. The current and prior quarter net charges were primarily due to asset impairments in the normal course of business.

INTEREST EXPENSE

For the three months ended May 5, 2007, interest expense was $12.0 million, or 1.5% of net sales, compared to $14.0 million, or 2.1% of net sales, for the three months ended April 29, 2006. The improvement of $2.0 million was primarily due to lower interest on capital lease obligations.

INCOME TAXES

For continuing operations, the effective income tax rates for the three-month periods ending May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 were 39.4% and (68.0%), respectively. The increase in the effective rate for the three-month period ended May 5, 2007 was primarily the result of a benefit recognized during the three-month period ended April 29, 2006 to reduce tax reserves resulting from the settlement of certain state tax examinations as well as other state benefits related to the divestiture of certain business units. The effective

30

income tax rates for discontinued operations for the three-month period ending April 29, 2006 was 68.0%. The effective income tax rate was higher than the expected rate due to the write-off of goodwill related to the sale of NDSG.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48) effective as of the beginning of fiscal year 2007. As a result of the implementation the Company recorded a $33.7 million decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits which was accounted for as an increase to the beginning shareholder’s equity. As of February 4, 2007 the Company had total gross unrecognized tax benefits of $44.0 million. Of this total, $12.6 million represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.

It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease in the next twelve months as a result of settling uncertain tax positions. However, the Company does not anticipate this to result in any material change to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits.

As a result of the analysis of unrecognized tax benefits (due to the adoption of FIN 48), the net deferred tax asset related to the state net operating loss carryforwards increased. Therefore, the company performed a valuation allowance analysis to determine the realization of this asset. This analysis resulted in an additional valuation allowance of $19.3 million with the offset recorded to shareholder’s equity in accordance with Statement of Position 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code.” The Company is under the provisions of Statement of Position 90-7 for these net operating losses since they were acquired through the acquisition of a company that had previously filed bankruptcy.

The Company files a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return as well as state tax returns in multiple state jurisdictions. The Company has completed examinations by the Internal Revenue Service for taxable years through January 29, 2005 with no significant adjustments. With respect to the state and local jurisdictions, the Company has completed examinations in many jurisdictions through the same period and currently has examinations in progress for several jurisdictions.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

CASH FLOW

The primary needs for cash are to acquire or construct new stores, renovate and expand existing stores, provide working capital for new and existing stores and service debt. The Company anticipates that available cash, cash generated from operating activities and borrowings under its revolving credit agreement will be sufficient to meet its financial commitments and provide opportunities for future growth.

31

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations was ($5.8) million for the three months ended May 5, 2007 and $161.9 million for the three months ended April 29, 2006. Cash provided by (used in) operating activities principally represents income before depreciation and non-cash charges and after changes in working capital. The $167.7 million decrease in 2007 from 2006 was largely due to the change in deferred income taxes and increased working capital needs.

Inventory, accounts payable and debt balances fluctuate throughout the year due to the seasonal nature of the Company’s business. Merchandise inventory balances at May 5, 2007 decreased from April 29, 2006 largely reflecting the disposition of Parisian-related inventories offset by planned increased inventories at SFA. Consolidated comparable inventories increased approximately 19% over last year, attributable to a planned increase at SFA.

Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was $31.8 million for the three months ended May 5, 2007 and $13.7 million for the three months ended April 29, 2006. Cash used in investing activities principally consists of construction of new stores and renovation and expansion of existing stores and investments in support areas (e.g., technology and distribution centers). The $18.1 million increase in cash used is primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures.

Property and equipment amounts at May 5, 2007 decreased from April 29, 2006 amounts primarily due to the disposal of assets related to the sale of Parisian, depreciation on existing assets during the last twelve months and to store closings and impairments, partially offset by capital expenditures related to new store additions, expansions, replacements and the remodeling of existing stores. Goodwill and intangibles at May 5, 2007 also decreased from April 29, 2006 due to the sale of Parisian and amortization expense during the last twelve months.

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities from continuing operations was ($82.0) million for the three months ended May 5, 2007 and $15.5 million for the three months ended April 29, 2006. The current period use primarily relates to the repurchase of approximately $95.9 million in principal amount of senior notes.

CASH BALANCES AND LIQUIDITY

The Company’s primary sources of short-term liquidity are cash on hand and availability under its revolving credit facility. At the Company’s request, due to the sale of NDSG, the revolving credit facility was reduced from $800 million to $500 million in March 2006. In September 2006, the maturity date of the revolving credit facility was extended to September 2011. At May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, the Company maintained cash and cash equivalent balances of $158.3 million and $1,152.2 million, respectively. Exclusive of approximately $16 million and $18 million of store operating cash at May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively, cash was invested principally in various money market funds at May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively. There was no restricted cash as of May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006.

32

At May 5, 2007, the Company had no direct borrowings under its $500 million revolving credit facility, and had $46.7 million in unfunded letters of credit, leaving unutilized availability under that facility of $453.3 million. The amount of cash on hand and borrowings under the facility are influenced by a number of factors, including sales, inventory levels, vendor terms, the level of capital expenditures, cash requirements related to financing instruments, and the Company’s tax payment obligations, among others.

On March 6, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend to shareholders of $4.00 per common share to shareholders of record as of April 14, 2006. On May 1, 2006, the Company paid that dividend totaling approximately $539 million. The remaining portion of the dividends will be paid prospectively as, and to the extent, awards of restricted stock and performance shares vest.

On August 30, 2006, the Company repurchased 450 thousand shares of Saks’ common stock at a cost of approximately $6.5 million, which left 37.4 million shares available for repurchase under the Company’s existing share repurchase program.

On October 3, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $4.00 per share of the Company’s common stock, and the Company reduced shareholders’ equity for the $558.6 million dividend. Approximately $552.0 million of the dividend was paid on November 30, 2006 to shareholders of record as of November 15, 2006. The remaining portion of the dividends will be paid prospectively as, and to the extent, awards of restricted stock and performance shares vest.

The Company believes it has sufficient cash on hand, availability under its revolving credit facility, and access to various capital markets to repay all of the Company’s senior notes at maturity.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

The Company continuously evaluates its debt-to-capitalization ratio in light of the Company’s disposition of businesses, economic trends, business trends, levels of interest rates, and terms, conditions and availability of capital in the capital markets. At May 5, 2007, the Company’s capital and financing structure was comprised of a revolving credit agreement, senior unsecured notes, convertible senior unsecured notes, and capital and operating leases. At May 5, 2007, total debt was $587.2 million, representing a decrease of $106.7 million from the balance of $693.9 million at April 29, 2006. This decrease in debt was primarily the result of the $95.9 million repurchase of senior notes and the $1.7 million reduction in capital leases associated with the sale of Parisian. Despite the decrease in debt, the debt-to-capitalization ratio increased to 33.9% from 30.3% in the prior year due to a reduction in Shareholders’ Equity, primarily related to the October 3, 2006 $4.00 per share dividend.

33

At May 5, 2007, the Company maintained a $500 million senior revolving credit facility maturing in 2011, which is secured by inventory and certain third party credit card accounts receivable. Borrowings are limited to a prescribed percentage of eligible inventories and receivables. There are no debt ratings-based provisions in the facility. The facility includes a fixed-charge coverage ratio requirement of 1 to 1 that the Company is subject to only if availability under the facility becomes less than $60 million. The facility contains default provisions that are typical for this type of financing, including a provision that would trigger a default of the facility if a default were to occur in another debt instrument resulting in the acceleration of principal of more than $20 million in that other instrument. At May 5, 2007, the Company had no borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

At May 5, 2007, the Company had $286.7 million of senior notes outstanding, excluding the convertible notes, comprised of five separate series having maturities ranging from 2008 to 2019 and interest rates ranging from 7.00% to 9.88%. The terms of each senior note call for all principal to be repaid at maturity. The senior notes have substantially identical terms except for the maturity dates and interest rates payable to investors. Each senior note contains limitations on the amount of secured indebtedness the Company may incur. The Company believes it has sufficient cash on hand, availability under its revolving credit facility and access to various capital markets to repay these notes at maturity.

On April 12, 2007, the Company announced the results of its modified “Dutch Auction” tender offer to purchase a portion of its 8 1/4% senior notes due November 15, 2008 for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $100 million (the “offer cap”). The offer expired on April 11, 2007. The aggregate principal amount of notes validly tendered at or above the clearing spread exceeded the offer cap and the Company accepted $95.9 million aggregate principal amount of the notes, resulting in an aggregate purchase price of $100 million (plus an additional $3.2 million in aggregate accrued interest on such notes). The Company accepted for purchase first, all notes tendered at spreads above the clearing spread, and thereafter, the notes validly tendered at the clearing spread on a prorated basis according to the principal amount of such notes. The Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $5.2 million related to the repurchase of the notes in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of income.

The Company had $230 million of convertible senior notes, at May 5, 2007, that bear interest of 2.0% and mature in 2024. The provisions of the convertible notes allow the holder to convert the notes to shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 83.5609 shares per one thousand dollars in principal amount of notes. The most significant terms and conditions of the senior notes include: the Company can settle a conversion of the par value with shares and/or cash; the holder may put the debt back to the Company in 2014 or 2019; the holder cannot convert until the Company’s share price exceeds the

34

conversion price by 20% for a certain trading period; the Company can call the debt on or after March 11, 2011; the conversion rate is subject to a dilution adjustment; and the holder can convert upon a significant credit rating decline and upon a call. The Company used approximately $25 million of the proceeds from the issuances to enter into a convertible note hedge and written call options on its common stock to reduce the exposure to dilution from the conversion of the notes. The Company believes it has sufficient cash on hand, availability under its revolving credit facility and access to various capital markets to repay both the senior notes and convertible notes at maturity.

During the quarter ended May 5, 2007, the aforementioned conversion criterion was met. The closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeded 120% of the convertible senior notes’ conversion price for at least 20 out of the last 30 consecutive trading days in the first calendar quarter of 2007. On April 3, 2007, the Company gave notice that holders of the convertible notes could convert them into shares of the Company’s common stock until June 30, 2007 in accordance with, and subject to, the terms of the convertible notes indenture. Since the holders of the convertible notes had the ability to exercise their conversion rights, the convertible notes were classified within the “current portion of long-term debt” on the Company’s May 5, 2007 balance sheet. As of June 1, 2007, no note holders had converted their notes into the Company’s common stock.

At May 5, 2007 the Company had $70.5 million in capital leases covering various properties and pieces of equipment. The terms of the capital leases provide the lessor with a security interest in the asset being leased and require the Company to make periodic lease payments, aggregating between $5 million and $7 million per year.

The Company is obligated to fund a cash balance pension plan. The Company’s current policy is to maintain at least the minimum funding requirements specified by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Company expects minimal or no funding requirements in 2007. As part of the sale of NDSG to Bon-Ton, the NDSG pension assets and liabilities were acquired by Bon-Ton. Additionally, the Company curtailed its SFA pension plan during 2006 which froze benefit accruals for all participants except those who have attained age 55 and completed 10 years of service as of January 1, 2007 and who continue to be highly compensated employees.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company has not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements which would be reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect, such as obligations under certain guarantees or contracts, retained or contingent interests in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar arrangements, obligations under certain derivative arrangements, or obligations under material variable interests.

There were no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations specified in Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K during the three months ended May 5, 2007. For additional information regarding the Company’s contractual obligations as of February 3, 2007, see the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of the 2006 Form 10-K.

35

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies is included in the Management Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that currently are not required to be measured at fair value. This Statement is effective no later than fiscal years beginning on or after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard may have on its financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This interpretation clarifies the application of Statement 109 by defining a criterion that an individual tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. For a benefit to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The benefit to be recognized for a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and disclosure. The Company adopted FIN 48 as of February 4, 2007.

The FASB is contemplating an amendment to SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” that would require the Company to ignore the cash presumption of net share settlement and to assume share settlement for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share. Although the Company is now required to ignore the contingent conversion provision on its convertible notes under EITF 04-08, it can still presume that it will satisfy the net share settlement of the par value upon conversion of the notes in cash, and thus exclude the effect of the conversion of the notes in its calculation of diluted earnings per share. If and when the FASB amends SFAS No. 128, the effect of the changes would require the Company to use the if-converted method in calculating diluted earnings per share except when the effect would be anti-dilutive. The effect of adopting the amendment to SFAS No. 128 would increase the number of shares in the Company’s diluted calculation by 19,219 shares.

36

During September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or a liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under SFAS No. 157, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this Statement and does not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS No. 158”). The Company adopted SFAS No. 158 prospectively on February 3, 2007. SFAS No. 158 requires an employer that sponsors one or more defined benefit pension plans or other postretirement plans to 1) recognize the funded status of a plan, measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation, in the balance sheet; 2) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost; 3) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end balance sheet; and 4) disclose in the notes to the financial statements additional information about the effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition assets or obligations. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 will require the Company to change the measurement date for the assets and liabilities of its employee benefit plans from November 1 to the Company’s fiscal year end beginning with the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

The information contained in this Form 10-Q that addresses future results or expectations is considered “forward-looking” information within the definition of the Federal securities laws. Forward-looking information in this document can be identified through the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “estimate,” “contemplate,” “possible,” and “point.” The forward-looking information is premised on many factors, some of which are outlined below. Actual consolidated results might differ materially from projected forward-looking information if there are any material changes in management’s assumptions.

The forward-looking information and statements are or may be based on a series of projections and estimates and involve risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include such factors as: the level of consumer spending for apparel and other merchandise carried by the Company and its ability to respond quickly to consumer trends; adequate and stable sources of merchandise; the competitive pricing environment

37

within the retail sector; the effectiveness of planned advertising, marketing, and promotional campaigns; favorable customer response to relationship marketing efforts of proprietary credit card loyalty programs; appropriate inventory management; effective expense control; successful operation of the Company’s proprietary credit card strategic alliance with HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.; geo-political risks; changes in interest rates; the outcome of the formal investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the inquiry the Company understands has been commenced by the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York into the matters that were the subject of the investigations conducted during 2004 and 2005 by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and any related matters that may be under investigation or the subject of inquiry; the ultimate amount of reimbursement to vendors of improperly collected markdown allowances; the ultimate impact of improper timing of recording of inventory markdowns; and the ultimate impact of incorrect timing of recording of vendor markdown allowances. For additional information regarding these and other risk factors, please refer to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 filed with the SEC, which may be accessed via EDGAR through the Internet at www.sec.gov.

Management undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Persons are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with the SEC and in its press releases.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s exposure to market risk primarily arises from changes in interest rates and the U.S. equity and bond markets. The effects of changes in interest rates on earnings generally have been small relative to other factors that also affect earnings, such as sales and operating margins. The Company seeks to manage exposure to adverse interest rate changes through its normal operating and financing activities, and if appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Such derivative instruments can be used as part of an overall risk management program in order to manage the costs and risks associated with various financial exposures. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for trading purposes, as clearly defined in its risk management policies. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its borrowings, and derivative financial instrument activities.

Based on the Company’s market risk sensitive instruments (including variable rate debt) outstanding at May 5, 2007, the Company has determined that there was no material market risk exposure to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as of such date.

38

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosures.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended May 5, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The information in “Part I – Financial Information, Note 10 – Legal Contingencies,” is incorporated into this Item by reference.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from our risk factors previously disclosed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2007.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the quarter ended May 5, 2007, the Company did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act.

The Company has a share repurchase program that authorizes it to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in order to both distribute cash to stockholders and manage dilution resulting from shares issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans. At May 5, 2007, 37.4 million shares remained available for repurchase under the Company’s 70.0 million share repurchase authorization. During the quarter ended May 5, 2007, the Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities.

39

Item 6. EXHIBITS

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

40

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SAKS INCORPORATED

Registrant

June 6, 2007

Date

/s/ Kevin G. Wills

Kevin G. Wills

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

41