10-K 1 psco1231201410k.htm 10-K PSCO 12.31.2014 10K

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 001-3280
Public Service Company of Colorado
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Colorado
 
84-0296600
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1800 Larimer, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80202
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 571-7511
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 and Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulations S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨
 
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer x
 
Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
As of Feb. 20, 2015, 100 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding, all of which were held by Xcel Energy Inc., a Minnesota corporation.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Xcel Energy Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

Public Service Company of Colorado meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form with reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction I(2).

 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
Index
PART I
 
Item 1A — Risk Factors
Item 2 — Properties
 
 
PART II
 
 
 
PART III
 
 
 
PART IV
 
 
 

This Form 10-K is filed by PSCo. PSCo is a wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc. Additional information on Xcel Energy is available in various filings with the SEC. This report should be read in its entirety.


2


PART I

Item lBusiness

DEFINITION OF ABBREVIATIONS AND INDUSTRY TERMS
Xcel Energy Inc.’s Subsidiaries and Affiliates (current and former)
NCE
New Century Energies, Inc.
NSP-Minnesota
Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation
NSP-Wisconsin
Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
PSCo
Public Service Company of Colorado
PSRI
P.S.R. Investments, Inc.
SPS
Southwestern Public Service Company
Utility subsidiaries
NSP-Minnesota, NSP-Wisconsin, PSCo and SPS
WYCO
WYCO Development LLC
Xcel Energy
Xcel Energy Inc. and subsidiaries
 
 
Federal and State Regulatory Agencies
CFTC
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
CPUC
Colorado Public Utilities Commission
D.C. Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
DOI
United States Department of the Interior
DOT
United States Department of Transportation
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
FERC
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
IRS
Internal Revenue Service
NERC
North American Electric Reliability Corporation
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 
Electric, Purchased Gas and Resource Adjustment Clauses
DSM
Demand side management
DSMCA
Demand side management cost adjustment
ECA
Retail electric commodity adjustment
ERP
Electric resource plan
GCA
Gas cost adjustment
PCCA
Purchased capacity cost adjustment
PSIA
Pipeline system integrity adjustment
QSP
Quality of service plan
RES
Renewable energy standard
RESA
Renewable energy standard adjustment
SCA
Steam cost adjustment
TCA
Transmission cost adjustment
 
 
Other Terms and Abbreviations
AFUDC
Allowance for funds used during construction
ALJ
Administrative law judge
APBO
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
ARO
Asset retirement obligation
ASU
FASB Accounting Standards Update
BART
Best available retrofit technology
C&I
Commercial and Industrial
CAA
Clean Air Act
CACJA
Clean Air Clean Jobs Act
CO2
Carbon dioxide

3


CPCN
Certificate of public convenience and necessity
CWIP
Construction work in progress
ETR
Effective tax rate
FASB
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FTY
Forecast test year
GAAP
Generally accepted accounting principles
GHG
Greenhouse gas
HTY
Historic test year
JOA
Joint operating agreement
MGP
Manufactured gas plant
MISO
Midcontinent Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
Moody’s
Moody’s Investor Services
Native load
Customer demand of retail and wholesale customers whereby a utility has an obligation to serve under statute or long-term contract.
NOL
Net operating loss
NOx
Nitrogen oxide
NOV
Notice of violation
NSPS
New source performance standard
O&M
Operating and maintenance
OCC
Office of Consumer Counsel
OCI
Other comprehensive income
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyl
PJM
PJM Interconnection, LLC
PM
Particulate matter
PPA
Purchased power agreement
PRP
Potentially responsible party
PTC
Production tax credit
PV
Photovoltaic
REC
Renewable energy credit
RFP
Request for proposal
ROE
Return on equity
ROFR
Right of first refusal
RPS
Renewable portfolio standards
RTO
Regional Transmission Organization
SCR
Selective catalytic reduction
SIP
State implementation plan
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
SPP
Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Standard & Poor’s
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services
 
 
Measurements
KV
Kilovolts
KWh
Kilowatt hours
MMBtu
Million British thermal units
MW
Megawatts
MWh
Megawatt hours
GWh
Gigawatt hours

4


COMPANY OVERVIEW

PSCo was incorporated in 1924 under the laws of Colorado.  PSCo is a utility engaged primarily in the generation, purchase, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in Colorado.  The wholesale customers served by PSCo comprised approximately 11 percent of its total KWh sold in 2014.  PSCo also purchases, transports, distributes and sells natural gas to retail customers and transports customer-owned natural gas.  PSCo provides electric utility service to approximately 1.4 million customers and natural gas utility service to approximately 1.3 million customers.  All of PSCo’s retail electric operating revenues were derived from operations in Colorado during 2014.  Although PSCo’s large commercial and industrial electric retail customers are comprised of many diversified industries, a significant portion of PSCo’s large commercial and industrial electric sales include the following industries:  fabricated metal products, communications and oil and gas extraction.  For small commercial and industrial customers, significant electric retail sales include the following industries:  real estate and dining establishments.  Generally, PSCo’s earnings contribute approximately 45 percent to 55 percent of Xcel Energy’s consolidated net income.

PSCo owns the following direct subsidiaries: 1480 Welton, Inc. and United Water Company, both of which own certain real estate interests; and Green and Clear Lakes Company, which owns water rights and certain real estate interests.  PSCo also owns PSRI, which held certain former employees’ life insurance policies.  PSCo also holds a controlling interest in several other relatively small ditch and water companies.

PSCo conducts its utility business in the following reportable segments: regulated electric utility, regulated natural gas utility and all other. See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion relating to comparative segment revenues, net income and related financial information.

PSCo’s corporate strategy focuses on four core objectives: improving utility performance; driving operational excellence; providing options and solutions to customers; and investing for the future.

ELECTRIC UTILITY OPERATIONS

Public Utility Regulation

Summary of Regulatory Agencies and Areas of Jurisdiction PSCo is regulated by the CPUC with respect to its facilities, rates, accounts, services and issuance of securities.  PSCo is regulated by the FERC with respect to its wholesale electric operations, accounting practices, hydroelectric licensing, wholesale sales for resale, the transmission of electricity in interstate commerce, compliance with the NERC electric reliability standards, asset transactions and mergers and natural gas transactions in interstate commerce.

Fuel, Purchased Energy and Conservation Cost-Recovery Mechanisms PSCo has several retail adjustment clauses that recover fuel, purchased energy and other resource costs:

ECA — The ECA recovers fuel and purchased energy costs. Short-term sales margins are shared with retail customers through the ECA. The ECA is revised quarterly.
PCCA — The PCCA recovers purchased capacity payments.
SCA — The SCA recovers the difference between PSCo’s actual cost of fuel and the amount of these costs recovered under its base steam service rates. The SCA rate is revised annually in January, as well as on an interim basis.
DSMCA — The DSMCA recovers DSM, interruptible service option credit costs and performance initiatives for achieving various energy savings goals.
RESA — The RESA recovers the incremental costs of compliance with the RES with a maximum of two percent of the customer’s total bill.

5


Wind Energy Service — Wind Energy Service is a premium service for customers who voluntarily choose to pay an additional charge for renewable resources.
TCA — The TCA recovers costs associated with transmission investment outside of rate cases.
CACJA — As part of its pending electric rate case, PSCo proposed to establish a CACJA rider, retroactive to Jan. 1, 2015, to recover costs associated with implementing its compliance plan under the CACJA.

PSCo recovers fuel and purchased energy costs from its wholesale electric customers through a fuel cost adjustment clause approved by the FERC. PSCo’s wholesale customers have agreed to pay the full cost of certain renewable energy purchase and generation costs through a fuel clause and in exchange receive RECs associated with those resources. The wholesale customers pay their jurisdictional allocation of production costs through a fully forecasted formula rate with true-up.

QSP Requirements The CPUC established an electric QSP that provides for bill credits to customers if PSCo does not achieve certain performance targets relating to electric reliability and customer service. PSCo monitors and records, as necessary, an estimated customer refund obligation under the QSP. The CPUC extended the terms of the current QSP through 2015.

Capacity and Demand

Uninterrupted system peak demand for PSCo’s electric utility for each of the last three years and the forecast for 2015, assuming normal weather, is listed below.
 
System Peak Demand (in MW)
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015 Forecast
PSCo
6,689

 
6,678

 
6,152

 
6,475


The peak demand for PSCo’s system typically occurs in the summer. The 2014 uninterrupted system peak demand for PSCo occurred on July 7, 2014. The 2014 system peak demand was lower due to reduced wholesale loads and cooler summer weather. In 2013 Comanche Unit 3 was off-line, which increased PSCo’s system load by approximately 250 MW for the backup power provided by PSCo to the joint owners. The forecast of 2015 system peak assumes normal weather conditions.

Energy Sources and Related Transmission Initiatives

PSCo expects to meet its system capacity requirements through existing electric generating stations, power purchases, new generation facilities, DSM options and phased expansion of existing generation at select power plants.

Purchased Power PSCo has contracts to purchase power from other utilities and independent power producers.  Long-term purchased power contracts typically require a periodic payment to secure the capacity and a charge for the associated energy actually purchased. PSCo also makes short-term purchases to meet system load and energy requirements, to replace generation from company-owned units under maintenance or during outages, to meet operating reserve obligations, or to obtain energy at a lower cost.

Purchased Transmission Services In addition to using its own transmission system, PSCo has contracts with regional transmission service providers to deliver energy to PSCo’s customers.

ERP and All-Source Solicitation In 2013, PSCo issued an All-Source RFP for 250 MW of generation by the end of 2018. PSCo also issued a separate wind RFP for PPAs only.

The CPUC provided final approval to PSCo’s plan in December 2013, which includes the following:

The addition of 450 MW of wind generation PPAs, which are expected to be operational in 2015. These additional PPAs will bring the installed wind capacity on PSCo’s system in Colorado to 2,650 MW;
The addition of 170 MW of utility-scale solar generation PPAs, which are expected to be operational in 2016. PSCo has approximately 80 MW of utility-scale solar and approximately 188 MW of customer-sited solar generation;
The addition of 317 MW of natural gas fired generation PPAs, which will come from existing power plants;
The accelerated retirements of the coal-fired Arapahoe Unit 3 (45 MW) and Unit 4 (109 MW), which occurred in 2013; and
The continued operation of Cherokee generating station’s Unit 4 as a natural gas facility after 2017.


6


In addition, PSCo continues to execute on the remaining aspects of CACJA compliance including the construction of a new natural gas fired combined cycle unit at Cherokee generating station and the addition of emissions controls at the Pawnee and Hayden stations. PSCo also expects to retire the Cherokee Unit 3 and Valmont Unit 5 coal-fired power plants by the end of 2015 and 2017, respectively.

Brush, Colo. to Castle Pines, Colo. 345 KV Transmission Line — In March 2014, PSCo filed with the CPUC for a CPCN to construct a new 345 KV transmission line originating from Pawnee Station, near Brush, Colo. and terminating at the Daniels Park substation, near Castle Pines, Colo. The estimated cost of the project is $178 million. In September 2014, PSCo entered into a partial settlement agreement with the CPUC Staff supporting the grant of a CPCN for the line. The OCC has opposed the CPCN. In November 2014, the ALJ issued a recommended decision approving the CPCN, but delaying construction until May 2020. PSCo filed exceptions to the recommended decision, requesting clarification and reconsideration to commence certain portions of the project in 2015. A CPUC decision is anticipated in the first quarter of 2015.

Thornton, Colo. Substation Project — In October 2014, PSCo filed with the CPUC for a CPCN to construct a new substation to serve growing load in and around Thornton, Colo. to be placed into service in July 2016.  The estimated cost of the project is approximately $34 million.  The OCC and the City of Thornton have intervened in the CPCN proceeding.  In November 2014, the matter was referred to an ALJ for hearing procedures.  In January 2015, PSCo and the OCC filed a settlement agreement with the CPUC requesting approval of the CPCN. The City of Thornton did not oppose the settlement. An evidentiary hearing was held in February 2015 and a CPUC decision is anticipated in the first quarter of 2015.

Boulder, Colo. Municipalization PSCo’s franchise agreement with the City of Boulder (Boulder) expired in December 2010. In November 2011, a ballot measure was passed which authorized the formation and operation of a municipal utility and the issuance of enterprise revenue bonds, subject to certain restrictions, including the level of initial rates and debt service coverage. In May 2014, the Boulder City Council passed an ordinance to establish an electric utility.

In 2013, the CPUC ruled that it has jurisdiction under Colorado law to determine the utility that will serve customers outside Boulder’s city limits, and will determine certain system separation matters as well as what facilities need to be constructed to ensure reliable service. The CPUC has declared that it should make its determinations prior to any eminent domain actions. In January 2014, Boulder appealed this ruling to the Boulder District Court. In January 2015, the Boulder District Court affirmed the CPUC decision.

Boulder sent PSCo an offer of $128 million for certain portions of PSCo’s transmission and distribution business. PSCo has notified Boulder that its offer was deficient. Under Colorado law, a condemning entity must pay the owner fair market value for the taking of and damages to the remainder of the property.

In July 2014, Boulder filed a petition for condemnation in the Boulder District Court. PSCo filed a motion to dismiss the petition based upon the CPUC’s ruling that it must determine the appropriate system separations prior to Boulder filing its condemnation case. PSCo’s motion to dismiss was granted in February 2015. This decision does not prevent Boulder from filing another condemnation petition if it obtains CPUC approval of a separation plan.

In August 2014, PSCo filed a petition with the FERC requesting an order requiring that Boulder’s attempt to acquire PSCo’s transmission and distribution facilities by condemnation requires prior FERC approval under the Federal Power Act. In December 2014, the FERC issued an order granting PSCo’s petition.

If Boulder proceeds with another condemnation petition and were to succeed in the eminent domain proceeding, PSCo would seek to obtain full compensation for the business and its associated property taken by Boulder, as well as for all damages resulting to PSCo and its system. PSCo would also seek appropriate compensation for stranded costs with the FERC.

RES Compliance Plan — Colorado law mandates that at least 30 percent of PSCo’s energy sales are supplied by renewable energy by 2020 and includes a distributed generation standard. In July 2013, PSCo filed its 2014 RES compliance plan. In July 2014, the ALJ issued a recommended decision accepting PSCo’s compliance plan with modifications. The CPUC approved the recommended decision with modifications in December 2014. PSCo subsequently requested additional adjustments to the CPUC’s decision, which were granted through an order issued in February 2015.

Net Metering Standard — In a filing, PSCo proposed to track and quantify the system costs that are not avoided by distributed solar generation, which PSCo has defined as a “net metering incentive,” for purposes of equitably recovering costs between customers. The CPUC assigned the net metering issue to its own docket. A CPUC decision is anticipated in the third quarter of 2015.


7


Steam System Package Boilers and Regulatory Plan In December 2014, PSCo filed the results of a steam survey along with both a short-term plan and a long-term plan for the steam system consisting of a request for a conditional CPCN to construct either one or two boilers for its steam utility, dependent on the next two seasons of winter peaking capacity. A decision is anticipated in the third quarter of 2015.

Fuel Supply and Costs

The following table shows the delivered cost per MMBtu of each significant category of fuel consumed for owned electric generation, the percentage of total fuel requirements represented by each category of fuel and the total weighted average cost of all fuels.
 
 
Coal
 
Natural Gas
 
Weighted
Average Owned Fuel Cost
PSCo Generating Plants
 
Cost
 
Percent
 
Cost
 
Percent
 
2014
 
$
1.82

 
75
%
 
$
5.32

 
25
%
 
$
2.68

2013
 
1.84

 
80

 
4.86

 
20

 
2.45

2012
 
1.77

 
78

 
4.25

 
22

 
2.31


The higher cost of natural gas was primarily due to higher market prices from increased demand because of cold weather in early 2014.

See Items 1A and 7 for further discussion of fuel supply and costs.

Fuel Sources

Coal  PSCo normally maintains approximately 41 days of coal inventory. Coal supply inventories at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were approximately 36 and 41 days usage, respectively. At Dec. 31, 2014, coal inventories were below optimal levels due to railcar congestion. PSCo’s generation stations use low-sulfur western coal purchased primarily under contracts with suppliers operating in Colorado and Wyoming. During 2014 and 2013, PSCo’s coal requirements for existing plants were approximately 10.3 million tons and 11.3 million tons, respectively. The estimated coal requirements for 2015 are approximately 11.0 million tons.

PSCo has contracted for coal supply to provide 96 percent of its estimated coal requirements in 2015, and a declining percentage of requirements in subsequent years. PSCo’s general coal purchasing objective is to contract for approximately 100 percent of requirements for the first year, 67 percent of requirements in year two, and 33 percent of requirements in year three. Remaining requirements will be filled through the procurement process or over-the-counter transactions.

PSCo has coal transportation contracts that provide for delivery of 100 percent of its coal requirements in 2015 and 2016. Coal delivery may be subject to interruptions or reductions due to operation of the mines, transportation problems, weather and availability of equipment.

Natural gas  PSCo uses both firm and interruptible natural gas supply and standby oil in combustion turbines and certain boilers. Natural gas supplies for PSCo’s power plants are procured under contracts to provide an adequate supply of fuel. However, as natural gas primarily serves intermediate and peak demand, any remaining forecasted requirements are able to be procured through a liquid spot market. The majority of natural gas supply under contract is covered by a long-term agreement with Anadarko Energy Services Company, the balance of natural gas supply contracts have variable pricing features tied to changes in various natural gas indices. PSCo hedges a portion of that risk through financial instruments. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Most transportation contract pricing is based on FERC approved transportation tariff rates. Certain natural gas supply and transportation agreements include obligations for the purchase and/or delivery of specified volumes of natural gas or to make payments in lieu of delivery.

At Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo’s commitments related to gas supply contracts, which expire in various years from 2015 through 2023, were approximately $902 million and commitments related to gas transportation and storage contracts, which expire in various years from 2015 through 2060, were approximately $685 million.
At Dec. 31, 2013, PSCo’s commitments related to gas supply contracts were approximately $1.1 billion and commitments related to gas transportation and storage contracts were approximately $723 million.


8


PSCo has limited on-site fuel oil storage facilities and primarily relies on the spot market for incremental supplies.

Renewable Energy Sources

PSCo’s renewable energy portfolio includes wind, hydroelectric, biomass and solar power from both owned generating facilities and PPAs. As of Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo was in compliance with mandated RPS, which require generation from renewable resources of 12 percent of electric retail sales.

Renewable energy comprised 21.4 percent and 21.9 percent of PSCo’s total owned and purchased energy for 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Wind energy comprised 18.9 percent and 19.3 percent of PSCo’s total owned and purchased energy for 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Hydroelectric, biomass and solar power comprised approximately 2.5 percent and 2.6 percent of PSCo’s total owned and purchased energy for 2014 and 2013.

PSCo also offers customer-focused renewable energy initiatives. Windsource allows customers to purchase a portion or all of their electricity from renewable sources. In 2014, the number of customers utilizing Windsource increased to approximately 41,000 from 37,000 in 2013. Windsource MWh sales declined slightly, due in part to loss of certain commercial customers, from approximately 197,000 MWh in 2013 to 188,000 MWh in 2014.

Additionally, to encourage the growth of solar energy on the system, customers are offered incentives to install solar panels on their homes and businesses under the Solar*Rewards program. Over 24,000 PV systems with approximately 221 MW of aggregate capacity and over 18,250 PV systems with approximately 188 MW of aggregate capacity have been installed in Colorado under this program as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In 2014, the first community solar gardens were interconnected in Colorado. As of Dec. 31, 2014, 14 gardens have been completed with 9.6 MW of capacity. 

Wind — PSCo acquires the majority of its wind energy from PPAs with wind farm owners, primarily located in Colorado. Currently, PSCo has 18 of these agreements in place, with facilities ranging in size from two MW to over 300 MW. PSCo owns and operates the 26 MW Ponnequin Wind Farm in northern Colorado, which has been in service since 1999.

PSCo had approximately 2,340 MW and 2,170 MW of wind energy on its system at the end of 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In October 2013, the CPUC approved the addition of 450 MW of Colorado wind generation PPA’s.
With the new projects, PSCo is anticipated to have approximately 2,592 MW of wind power by 2016. In addition to receiving purchased wind energy under these agreements, PSCo also typically receives wind RECs, which are used to meet state renewable resource requirements.
The average cost per MWh of wind energy under these contracts was approximately $45 in both 2014 and 2013. The cost per MWh of wind energy varies by contract and may be influenced by a number of factors including regulation, state-specific renewable resource requirements, and the year of contract execution. Generally, contracts executed in 2014 continued to benefit from improvements in technology, excess capacity among manufacturers, and motivation to commence new construction prior to the expiration of the Federal PTCs in 2014, with certain projects qualifying into future years.

Wholesale Commodity Marketing Operations

PSCo conducts various wholesale marketing operations, including the purchase and sale of electric capacity, energy and energy related products. See Item 7A for further discussion.


9


Summary of Recent Federal Regulatory Developments

The FERC has jurisdiction over rates for electric transmission service in interstate commerce and electricity sold at wholesale, hydro facility licensing, natural gas transportation, asset transactions and mergers, accounting practices and certain other activities of PSCo, including enforcement of NERC mandatory electric reliability standards.  State and local agencies have jurisdiction over many of PSCo’s activities, including regulation of retail rates and environmental matters.  In addition to the matters discussed below, see Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a discussion of other regulatory matters.

FERC Order, New ROE Policy — In June 2014, the FERC adopted a new two-step ROE methodology for electric utilities. In October 2014, the FERC upheld the determination of the long-term growth rate to be used in its new ROE methodology. Several parties sought rehearing of the June 2014 order and therefore the new FERC policy may be subject to additional changes.

FERC Order 1000, Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation (Order 1000) — In 2011, the FERC issued a final ruling, Order 1000, adopting new requirements for transmission planning, cost allocation and development to be effective prospectively. Order 1000 requires:

The development of tariffs that provide for joint regional transmission planning and cost allocation for all FERC-jurisdictional utilities within a region;
The coordination between regions for the development of interregional plans for transmission planning and cost allocation;
Each public utility transmission provider to amend its Open Access Transmission Tariff to describe procedures that provide for the consideration of transmission needs driven by public policy requirements in the local and regional transmission planning processes; and
The removal of ROFR provisions from FERC-jurisdictional wholesale transmission contracts and tariffs that presently grant the incumbent transmission owner a federal ROFR to build certain types of transmission projects in its service area.

The jurisdictional WestConnect utilities, including PSCo, have submitted multiple compliance filings with the FERC to implement the Order 1000 requirements. Some of the new compliance provisions that were filed have already been approved but others remain under review by the FERC. The ultimate impact of Order 1000 on future PSCo transmission investment is not known at this time.

NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Requirements — The FERC has approved version 5 of NERC’s CIP standards. Requirements must be applied to high and medium impact assets by April 1, 2016 and to low impact assets by April 1, 2017. PSCo is currently in the process of evaluating the new requirements and identifying initiatives needed to meet the compliance deadlines.

NERC Physical Security Requirements — In November 2014, the FERC issued its final rule approving NERC’s proposed CIP standard related to physical security for bulk electric system facilities. The new standard will become enforceable in October 2015 with staggered milestone deliverable dates through 2016.  PSCo is currently in the process of developing and performing the initial risk assessment in accordance with the requirements of the standard, which will provide a basis to estimate the cost of protections necessary to meet the standard.  The additional cost for compliance is anticipated to be recoverable through rates.


10


Electric Operating Statistics

Electric Sales Statistics
 
Year Ended Dec. 31
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
Electric sales (Millions of KWh)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
9,009

 
9,266

 
9,193

 
Large commercial and industrial
6,712

 
6,652

 
6,649

 
Small commercial and industrial
12,709

 
12,716

 
12,711

 
Public authorities and other
241

 
227

 
233

 
Total retail
28,671

 
28,861

 
28,786

 
Sales for resale
3,664

 
4,467

 
4,464

 
Total energy sold
32,335

 
33,328

 
33,250

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of customers at end of period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
1,202,621

 
1,187,308

 
1,176,356

 
Large commercial and industrial
334

 
328

 
334

 
Small commercial and industrial
156,809

 
155,643

 
154,575

 
Public authorities and other
53,824

 
53,724

 
54,396

 
Total retail
1,413,588

 
1,397,003

 
1,385,661

 
Wholesale
23

 
23

 
20

 
Total customers
1,413,611

 
1,397,026

 
1,385,681

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric revenues (Thousands of Dollars)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
$
1,081,092

 
$
1,083,928

 
$
1,015,497

 
Large commercial and industrial
462,449

 
437,556

 
401,481

 
Small commercial and industrial
1,267,023

 
1,218,856

 
1,136,636

 
Public authorities and other
54,555

 
52,676

 
49,900

 
Total retail
2,865,119

 
2,793,016

 
2,603,514

 
Wholesale
211,241

 
228,041

 
210,627

 
Other electric revenues
49,577

 
60,114

 
155,758

 
Total electric revenues
$
3,125,937

 
$
3,081,171

 
$
2,969,899

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
KWh sales per retail customer
20,282

 
20,659

 
20,774

 
Revenue per retail customer
$
2,027

 
$
1,999

 
$
1,879

 
Residential revenue per KWh
12.00

¢
11.70

¢
11.05

¢
Large commercial and industrial revenue per KWh
6.89

 
6.58

 
6.04

 
Small commercial and industrial revenue per KWh
9.97

 
9.59

 
8.94

 
Total retail revenue per KWh
9.99

 
9.68

 
9.04

 
Wholesale revenue per KWh
5.77

 
5.11

 
4.72

 


11


Energy Source Statistics
 
Year Ended Dec. 31
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
Millions of
KWh
 
Percent of
Generation
 
Millions of
KWh
 
Percent of
Generation
 
Millions of
KWh
 
Percent of
Generation
Coal
18,274

 
53
%
 
19,647

 
56
%
 
21,367

 
59
%
Natural Gas
8,601

 
25

 
7,565

 
22

 
7,930

 
22

Wind (a)
6,472

 
19

 
6,750

 
19

 
5,752

 
16

Hydroelectric
617

 
2

 
655

 
2

 
590

 
2

Other (b)
294

 
1

 
250

 
1

 
263

 
1

Total
34,258

 
100
%
 
34,867

 
100
%
 
35,902

 
100
%
 


 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Owned generation
23,023

 
67
%
 
22,873

 
66
%
 
23,766

 
66
%
Purchased generation
11,235

 
33

 
11,994

 
34

 
12,136

 
34

Total
34,258

 
100
%
 
34,867

 
100
%
 
35,902

 
100
%

(a)
This category includes wind energy de-bundled from RECs and also includes Windsource RECs.  PSCo uses RECs to meet or exceed state resource requirements and may sell surplus RECs.
(b)
Distributed generation from the Solar*Rewards program is not included, and was approximately 197, 172, and 133 net million KWh for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

NATURAL GAS UTILITY OPERATIONS

Overview

The most significant developments in the natural gas operations of PSCo are continued volatility in natural gas market prices, uncertainty regarding political and regulatory developments that impact hydraulic fracturing, safety requirements for natural gas pipelines and the continued trend of declining use per residential and commercial and industrial (C&I) customer, as a result of improved building construction technologies, higher appliance efficiencies, and conservation. From 2000 to 2014, average annual sales to the typical PSCo residential customer declined 12 percent, while sales to the typical C&I customer declined 11 percent, each on a weather‑normalized basis. Although wholesale price increases do not directly affect earnings because of natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, high prices can encourage further efficiency efforts by customers.

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Pipeline Safety Act The Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act, signed into law in January 2012 (Pipeline Safety Act) requires additional verification of pipeline infrastructure records by pipeline owners and operators to confirm the maximum allowable operating pressure of lines located in high consequence areas or more-densely populated areas. The DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) will require operators to re-confirm the maximum allowable operating pressure if records are inadequate. This process could cause temporary or permanent limitations on throughput for affected pipelines. In addition, the Pipeline Safety Act requires PHMSA to issue reports and develop new regulations including: requiring use of automatic or remote-controlled shut-off valves; requiring testing of certain previously untested transmission lines; and expanding integrity management requirements. The Pipeline Safety Act also raises the maximum penalty for violating pipeline safety rules to $2 million per day for related violations. While PSCo cannot predict the ultimate impact Pipeline Safety Act will have on its costs, operations or financial results, it is taking actions that are intended to comply with the Pipeline Safety Act and any related PHMSA regulations as they become effective.  PSCo can generally recover costs to comply with the transmission and distribution integrity management programs through the PSIA rider.

Public Utility Regulation

Summary of Regulatory Agencies and Areas of Jurisdiction PSCo is regulated by the CPUC with respect to its facilities, rates, accounts, services and issuance of securities.  PSCo holds a FERC certificate that allows it to transport natural gas in interstate commerce without PSCo becoming subject to full FERC jurisdiction under the Federal Natural Gas Act.  PSCo is subject to the DOT and the CPUC with regards to pipeline safety compliance.


12


Purchased Natural Gas and Conservation Cost-Recovery Mechanisms PSCo has retail adjustment clauses that recover purchased natural gas and other resource costs:

GCA — The GCA recovers the actual costs of purchased natural gas and transportation to meet the requirements of its customers and is revised quarterly to allow for changes in natural gas rates.
DSMCA — The DSMCA recovers costs of DSM and performance initiatives to achieve various energy savings goals.
PSIA — The PSIA recovers costs associated with transmission and distribution pipeline integrity management programs and two projects to replace large transmission pipelines. The rider was extended through 2015.

QSP Requirements — The CPUC established a natural gas QSP that provides for bill credits to customers if PSCo does not achieve certain performance targets relating to natural gas leak repair time and customer service. The CPUC has extended the terms of the QSP through 2015.

Capability and Demand

PSCo projects peak day natural gas supply requirements for firm sales and backup transportation to be 1,983,672 MMBtu. In addition, firm transportation customers hold 771,112 MMBtu of capacity for PSCo without supply backup. Total firm delivery obligation for PSCo is 2,754,784 MMBtu per day. The maximum daily deliveries for PSCo for firm and interruptible services were 2,116,747 MMBtu on Dec. 30, 2014 and 1,865,207 MMBtu on Dec. 5, 2013.

PSCo purchases natural gas from independent suppliers, generally based on market indices that reflect current prices. The natural gas is delivered under transportation agreements with interstate pipelines. These agreements provide for firm deliverable pipeline capacity of approximately 1,814,265 MMBtu per day, which includes 850,840 MMBtu of natural gas held under third-party underground storage agreements. In addition, PSCo operates three company-owned underground storage facilities, which provide approximately 41,000 MMBtu of natural gas supplies on a peak day. The balance of the quantities required to meet firm peak day sales obligations are primarily purchased at PSCo’s city gate meter stations.

PSCo is required by CPUC regulations to file a natural gas purchase plan each year projecting and describing the quantities of natural gas supplies, upstream services and the costs of those supplies and services for the 12-month period of the following year. PSCo is also required to file a natural gas purchase report by October of each year reporting actual quantities and costs incurred for natural gas supplies and upstream services for the previous 12-month period.

Natural Gas Supply and Costs

PSCo actively seeks natural gas supply, transportation and storage alternatives to yield a diversified portfolio that provides increased flexibility, decreased interruption and financial risk and economical rates.  In addition, PSCo conducts natural gas price hedging activities that have been approved by the CPUC.

The following table summarizes the average delivered cost per MMBtu of natural gas purchased for resale by PSCo’s regulated retail natural gas distribution business:
2014
$
4.91

2013
4.20

2012
4.28


The higher cost of natural gas was primarily due to higher market prices from increased demand because of cold weather in early 2014.

PSCo has natural gas supply, transportation and storage agreements that include obligations for the purchase and/or delivery of specified volumes of natural gas or to make payments in lieu of delivery. At Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo was committed to approximately $1.4 billion in such obligations under these contracts, which expire in various years from 2015 through 2029.

PSCo purchases natural gas by optimizing a balance of long-term and short-term natural gas purchases, firm transportation and natural gas storage contracts. During 2014, PSCo purchased natural gas from approximately 34 suppliers.

See Items 1A and 7 for further discussion of natural gas supply and costs.


13


Natural Gas Operating Statistics
 
Year Ended Dec. 31
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Natural gas deliveries (Thousands of MMBtu)
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
99,127

 
100,329

 
85,280

Commercial and industrial
40,438

 
40,259

 
34,597

Total retail
139,565

 
140,588

 
119,877

Transportation and other
108,006

 
109,637

 
101,490

Total deliveries
247,571

 
250,225

 
221,367

 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of customers at end of period
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
1,240,674

 
1,228,917

 
1,217,972

Commercial and industrial
100,238

 
100,071

 
100,110

Total retail
1,340,912

 
1,328,988

 
1,318,082

Transportation and other
6,547

 
6,273

 
5,746

Total customers
1,347,459

 
1,335,261

 
1,323,828

 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas revenues (Thousands of Dollars)
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
$
824,633

 
$
729,304

 
$
650,107

Commercial and industrial
313,821

 
273,032

 
241,777

Total retail
1,138,454

 
1,002,336

 
891,884

Transportation and other
76,870

 
78,367

 
70,551

Total natural gas revenues
$
1,215,324

 
$
1,080,703

 
$
962,435

 
 
 
 
 
 
MMBtu sales per retail customer
104.08

 
105.79

 
90.95

Revenue per retail customer
$
849

 
$
754

 
$
677

Residential revenue per MMBtu
8.32

 
7.27

 
7.62

Commercial and industrial revenue per MMBtu
7.76

 
6.78

 
6.99

Transportation and other revenue per MMBtu
0.71

 
0.71

 
0.70


GENERAL

Seasonality

The demand for electric power and natural gas is affected by seasonal differences in the weather. In general, peak sales of electricity occur in the summer months, and peak sales of natural gas occur in the winter months. As a result, the overall operating results may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis. Additionally, PSCo’s operations have historically generated less revenues and income when weather conditions are milder in the winter and cooler in the summer. See Item 7 for further discussion.

Competition

PSCo is a vertically integrated utility, subject to traditional cost-of-service regulation. However, PSCo is subject to different public policies that promote competition and the development of energy markets. PSCo’s industrial and large commercial customers have the ability to own or operate facilities to generate their own electricity. In addition, customers may have the option of substituting other fuels, such as natural gas, steam or chilled water for heating, cooling and manufacturing purposes, or the option of relocating their facilities to a lower cost region. Customers also have the opportunity to supply their own power with on-site solar generation (typically rooftop solar) and in most jurisdictions can currently avoid paying for most of the fixed production, transmission and distribution costs incurred to serve them. Finally, customers can elect to subscribe to a community solar garden at pricing that affords them the same opportunity to avoid fixed charges as if they had rooftop installations.


14


The FERC has continued to promote competitive wholesale markets through open access transmission and other means. As a result, PSCo and its wholesale customers can purchase generation resources from competing wholesale suppliers and use the transmission systems of Xcel Energy Inc.’s utility subsidiaries on a comparable basis to serve their native load. State public utilities commissions, including the CPUC, have created resource planning programs that promote competition in the acquisition of electricity generation resources used to provide service to retail customers. In addition, FERC Order 1000 seeks to establish competition for construction and operation of certain new electric transmission facilities. PSCo also has franchise agreements with certain cities subject to periodic renewal. If a city elected not to renew a franchise agreement, it could seek alternative means for its citizens to access electric power or gas, such as municipalization. Several states, including Colorado, have policies designed to promote the development of solar and other distributed energy resources through significant incentive policies; with these incentives and federal tax subsidies, distributed generating resources are potential competitors to Xcel Energy’s electric service business. While facing these challenges, PSCo believes its rates and services are competitive with currently available alternatives.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

PSCo’s facilities are regulated by federal and state environmental agencies. These agencies have jurisdiction over air emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges, solid wastes and hazardous substances. Various company activities require registrations, permits, licenses, inspections and approvals from these agencies. PSCo has received all necessary authorizations for the construction and continued operation of its generation, transmission and distribution systems. PSCo’s facilities have been designed and constructed to operate in compliance with applicable environmental standards. However, it is not possible to determine when or to what extent additional facilities or modifications of existing or planned facilities will be required as a result of changes to environmental regulations, interpretations or enforcement policies or what effect future laws or regulations may have upon PSCo’s operations. See Notes 11 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

There are significant future environmental regulations under consideration to encourage the use of clean energy technologies and regulate emissions of GHGs to address climate change. PSCo has undertaken a number of initiatives to meet current requirements and prepare for potential future regulations, reduce GHG emissions and respond to state renewable and energy efficiency goals. If these future environmental regulations do not provide credit for the investments we have already made to reduce GHG emissions, or if they require additional initiatives or emission reductions, then their requirements would potentially impose additional substantial costs. We believe, based on prior state commission practice, we would recover the cost of these initiatives through rates.

EMPLOYEES

As of Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo had 2,690 full-time employees and two part-time employees, of which 2,063 were covered under collective-bargaining agreements. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Item 1A — Risk Factors

Like other companies in our industry, Xcel Energy, which includes PSCo, is subject to a variety of risks, many of which are beyond our control. Important risks that may adversely affect the business, financial condition, and results of operations are further described below. These risks should be carefully considered together with the other information set forth in this report and in future reports that Xcel Energy files with the SEC.

Oversight of Risk and Related Processes

A key accountability of the Board of Directors is to identify, manage and mitigate material risk. Our Board employs an effective process for doing so, combining management and Board risk oversight. The guidelines on corporate governance and Board committee charters define the scope of review and inquiry for the Board and its committees regarding risk management. As provided below, management and each committee has responsibility for overseeing aspects of risk management and mitigation of the risk.


15


Management identifies and analyzes risks to determine materiality and other attributes such as timing, probability and controllability, broadly considering our business, the utility industry, the domestic and global economy and the environment. Identification and analysis occurs formally through a key risk assessment process conducted by senior management, the financial disclosure process, the hazard risk management process and internal auditing and compliance with financial and operational controls. Management also identifies and analyzes risk through its business planning process and development of goals and key performance indicators, which include risk identification to determine barriers to implementing our strategy. At the same time, the business planning process identifies areas in which there is a potential for a business area to take inappropriate risk to meet goals and determines how to prevent inappropriate risk-taking.

At a threshold level, we have developed a robust compliance program and promote a culture of compliance, including tone at the top, which mitigates risk. The process for risk mitigation includes adherence to our code of conduct and other compliance policies, operation of formal risk management structures and groups, and overall business management to mitigate the risks inherent in the implementation strategy. Building on this culture of compliance, we manage and further mitigate risks through operation of formal risk management structures and groups, including management councils, risk committees and the services of internal corporate areas such as internal audit, the corporate controller and legal services.

Management communicates regularly with the Board and key stakeholders regarding risk. Senior management presents a periodic assessment of key risks to the Board. The presentation of the key risks and the discussion provides the Board with information on the risks management believes are material, including the earnings impact, timing, likelihood and controllability. Management also provides information to the Board in presentations and communications over the course of the year.

The Board has assigned several important aspects of its governance and oversight to four standing committees to ensure issues and risks are well understood and effectively managed. While the Board as a whole reviews management’s key risk assessment and analyzes areas of potential future risk to Xcel Energy, the committees provide focused oversight of specific risks assigned to them. This provides robust and comprehensive risk management that is critical to successful execution of corporate strategy.

Risks Associated with Our Business

Environmental Risks

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations, with which compliance could be difficult and costly.

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that affect many aspects of our past, present and future operations, including air emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges and the generation, transport and disposal of solid wastes and hazardous substances. These laws and regulations require us to obtain and comply with a wide variety of environmental requirements including those for protected natural and cultural resources (such as wetlands, endangered species and other protected wildlife, and archaeological and historical resources), licenses, permits, inspections and other approvals. Environmental laws and regulations can also require us to restrict or limit the output of certain facilities or the use of certain fuels, install pollution control equipment at our facilities, clean up spills and other contamination and correct environmental hazards. Environmental regulations may also lead to shutdown of existing facilities, either due to the difficulty in assuring compliance or that the costs of compliance no longer makes operation of the units economic. Both public officials and private individuals may seek to enforce the applicable environmental laws and regulations against us.  We may be required to pay all or a portion of the cost to remediate (i.e., cleanup) sites where our past activities, or the activities of certain other parties, caused environmental contamination. At Dec. 31, 2014, these sites included:

Sites of former MGPs operated by us, our predecessors, or other entities; and
Third party sites, such as landfills, for which we are alleged to be a PRP that sent hazardous materials and wastes.

We are also subject to mandates to provide customers with clean energy, renewable energy and energy conservation offerings.  Failure to meet the requirements of these mandates may result in fines or penalties, which could have a material effect on our results of operations.  If our regulators do not allow us to recover all or a part of the cost of capital investment or the O&M costs incurred to comply with the mandates, it could have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In addition, existing environmental laws or regulations may be revised, and new laws or regulations seeking to protect the environment may be adopted or become applicable to us, including but not limited to, regulation of mercury, NOx, SO2, CO2 and other GHGs, particulates and cooling water intake systems.  We may also incur additional unanticipated obligations or liabilities under existing environmental laws and regulations.


16


We are subject to physical and financial risks associated with climate change.

There is a growing consensus that emissions of GHGs are linked to global climate change.  Climate change creates physical and financial risk. Physical risks from climate change include changes in weather conditions, changes in precipitation and extreme weather events.

Our customers’ energy needs vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity.  For residential customers, heating and cooling represent their largest energy use.  To the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, customers’ energy use could increase or decrease. Increased energy use due to weather changes may require us to invest in additional generating assets, transmission and other infrastructure to serve increased load.  Decreased energy use due to weather changes may affect our financial condition, through decreased revenues. Extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stress, including service interruptions.  Weather conditions outside of our service territory could also have an impact on our revenues. We buy and sell electricity depending upon system needs and market opportunities.  Extreme weather conditions creating high energy demand may raise electricity prices, which would increase the cost of energy we provide to our customers.

Severe weather impacts our service territories, primarily when thunderstorms, tornadoes and snow or ice storms occur.  To the extent the frequency of extreme weather events increases, this could increase our cost of providing service.  Changes in precipitation resulting in droughts or water shortages could adversely affect our operations, principally our fossil generating units.  A negative impact to water supplies due to long-term drought conditions could adversely impact our ability to provide electricity to customers, as well as increase the price they pay for energy.  We may not recover all costs related to mitigating these physical and financial risks.

To the extent climate change impacts a region’s economic health, it may also impact our revenues.  Our financial performance is tied to the health of the regional economies we serve.  The price of energy, as a factor in a region’s cost of living as well as an important input into the cost of goods and services, has an impact on the economic health of our communities.  The cost of additional regulatory requirements, such as a tax on GHGs, regulation of CO2 emissions under section 111(d) of the CAA, or additional environmental regulation could impact the availability of goods and prices charged by our suppliers which would normally be borne by consumers through higher prices for energy and purchased goods.  To the extent financial markets view climate change and emissions of GHGs as a financial risk, this could negatively affect our ability to access capital markets or cause us to receive less than ideal terms and conditions.

Financial Risks

Our profitability depends in part on our ability to recover costs from our customers and there may be changes in circumstances or in the regulatory environment that impair our ability to recover costs from our customers.

We are subject to comprehensive regulation by federal and state utility regulatory agencies.  The CPUC regulates many aspects of our utility operations, including siting and construction of facilities, customer service and the rates that we can charge customers.  The FERC has jurisdiction, among other things, over wholesale rates for electric transmission service, the sale of electric energy in interstate commerce and certain natural gas transactions in interstate commerce.

The profitability of our operations is dependent on our ability to recover the costs of providing energy and utility services to our customers and earn a return on our capital investment in our utility operations.  We provide service at rates approved by one or more regulatory commissions. These rates are generally regulated and based on an analysis of our costs incurred in a test year.  Thus, the rates we are allowed to charge may or may not match our costs at any given time.  While rate regulation is premised on providing an opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, in a continued low interest rate environment there has been pressure pushing down ROE. There can also be no assurance that the applicable regulatory commission will judge all of our costs to have been prudent or that the regulatory process in which rates are determined will always result in rates that will produce full recovery of our costs.  Cost disallowances may arise as a result of prudence investigations (e.g., the recent investigation of our PSIA costs). Rising fuel costs could increase the risk that we will not be able to fully recover our fuel costs from our customers.  Furthermore, there could be changes in the regulatory environment that would impair our ability to recover costs historically collected from our customers.

Management currently believes these prudently incurred costs are recoverable given the existing regulatory mechanisms in place. However, adverse regulatory rulings or the imposition of additional regulations, including additional environmental or climate change regulation, could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and hence could materially and adversely affect our ability to meet our financial obligations, including debt payments.


17


Any reductions in our credit ratings could increase our financing costs and the cost of maintaining certain contractual relationships.

We cannot be assured that any of our current ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency.  In addition, our credit ratings may change as a result of the differing methodologies or change in the methodologies used by the various rating agencies.  Any downgrade could lead to higher borrowing costs.  Also, we may enter into certain procurement and derivative contracts that require the posting of collateral or settlement of applicable contracts if credit ratings fall below investment grade.

We are subject to capital market and interest rate risks.

Utility operations require significant capital investment in property, plant and equipment. As a result, we frequently need to access the debt and equity capital markets.  Any disruption in capital markets could have a material impact on our ability to fund our operations.  Capital markets are global in nature and are impacted by numerous issues and events throughout the world economy.  Capital market disruption events and resulting broad financial market distress could prevent us from issuing new securities or cause us to issue securities with less than ideal terms and conditions, such as higher interest rates.

Higher interest rates on short-term borrowings with variable interest rates or on incremental commercial paper issuances could also have an adverse effect on our operating results.  Changes in interest rates may also impact the fair value of the debt securities in the master pension trust, as well as our ability to earn a return on short-term investments of excess cash.

We are subject to credit risks.

Credit risk includes the risk that our retail customers will not pay their bills, which may lead to a reduction in liquidity and an eventual increase in bad debt expense.  Retail credit risk is comprised of numerous factors including the price of products and services provided, the overall economy and local economies in the geographic areas we serve, including local unemployment rates.

Credit risk also includes the risk that various counterparties that owe us money or product will breach their obligations.  Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, we may be forced to enter into alternative arrangements.  In that event, our financial results could be adversely affected and we could incur losses.

One alternative available to address counterparty credit risk is to transact on liquid commodity exchanges.  The credit risk is then socialized through the exchange central clearinghouse function.  While exchanges do remove counterparty credit risk, all participants are subject to margin requirements, which create an additional need for liquidity to post margin as exchange positions change value daily. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) requires broad clearing of financial swap transactions through a central counterparty, which could lead to additional margin requirements that would impact our liquidity. However, we have taken advantage of an exception to mandatory clearing afforded to commercial end-users who are not classified as a major swap participant.  The Board of Directors has authorized Xcel Energy and its subsidiaries to take advantage of this end-user exception. In addition, the CFTC’s rules permit us to deal in utility operations-related swaps with utility special entities and not be required to register as a swap dealer provided that our aggregate gross notional amount of swap dealing activity (including utility operations-related swaps) does not exceed the general de minimis threshold and provided that we have not exceeded the special entity de minimis threshold (excluding utility operations-related swaps) of $25 million for the preceding 12 months. Our current level of financial swap activity with special entities is significantly below this special entity de minimis threshold; therefore, we will not be classified as a swap dealer in our special entity activity.  Swap transactions with non-special entities have a much higher level of activity considered to be de minimis, currently $8 billion, and our level of activity is well under this limit; therefore, we will not be classified as a swap dealer under the Dodd-Frank Act.  We are currently reporting all of our swap transactions as part of the Dodd-Frank Act.

We may at times have direct credit exposure in our short-term wholesale and commodity trading activity to various financial institutions trading for their own accounts or issuing collateral support on behalf of other counterparties.  We may also have some indirect credit exposure due to participation in organized markets, such as SPP, PJM and MISO, in which any credit losses are socialized to all market participants.


18


We do have additional indirect credit exposures to various domestic and foreign financial institutions in the form of letters of credit provided as security by power suppliers under various long-term physical purchased power contracts.  If any of the credit ratings of the letter of credit issuers were to drop below the designated investment grade rating stipulated in the underlying long-term purchased power contracts, the supplier would need to replace that security with an acceptable substitute.  If the security were not replaced, the party could be in technical default under the contract, which would enable us to exercise our contractual rights.

Increasing costs associated with our defined benefit retirement plans and other employee benefits may adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

We have defined benefit pension and postretirement plans that cover substantially all of our employees.  Assumptions related to future costs, return on investments, interest rates and other actuarial assumptions have a significant impact on our funding requirements related to these plans.  These estimates and assumptions may change based on economic conditions, actual stock and bond market performance, changes in interest rates and changes in governmental regulations.  In addition, the Pension Protection Act changed the minimum funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans with modifications to these funding requirements that allowed additional flexibility in the timing of contributions.  Therefore, our funding requirements and related contributions may change in the future.  Also, the payout of a significant percentage of pension plan liabilities in a single year due to high retirements or employees leaving the company could trigger settlement accounting and could require the company to recognize material incremental pension expense related to unrecognized plan losses in the year these liabilities are paid.

Increasing costs associated with health care plans may adversely affect our results of operations.

Our self-insured costs of health care benefits for eligible employees have increased in recent years.  Increasing levels of large individual health care claims and overall health care claims could have an adverse impact on our operating results, financial position, and liquidity.  We believe that our employee benefit costs, including costs related to health care plans for our employees and former employees, will continue to rise.  Changes in industry standards utilized by management in key assumptions (e.g., mortality tables) could have a significant impact on future liabilities and benefit costs. Legislation related to health care could also significantly change our benefit programs and costs.

Operational Risks

We are subject to commodity risks and other risks associated with energy markets and energy production.

We engage in wholesale sales and purchases of electric capacity, energy and energy-related products as well as natural gas. As a result we are subject to market supply and commodity price risk.  Commodity price changes can affect the value of our commodity trading derivatives. We mark certain derivatives to estimated fair market value on a daily basis (mark-to-market accounting).  Actual settlements can vary significantly from estimated fair values recorded to the consolidated financial statements, and significant changes from the assumptions underlying our fair value estimates could cause significant earnings variability.

If we encounter market supply shortages or our suppliers are otherwise unable to meet their contractual obligations, we may be unable to fulfill our contractual obligations to our customers at previously authorized or anticipated costs.  Any such disruption, if significant, would cause us to seek alternative supply services at potentially higher costs or suffer increased liability for unfulfilled contractual obligations. Any significantly higher energy or fuel costs relative to corresponding sales commitments would have a negative impact on our cash flows and could potentially result in economic losses.  Potential market supply shortages may not be fully resolved through alternative supply sources and such interruptions may cause short-term disruptions in our ability to provide electric and/or natural gas services to our customers.  The impact of these cost and reliability issues depends on our operating conditions such as generation fuels mix, availability of water for cooling, availability of fuel transportation including rail shipments of coal, electric generation capacity, transmission, natural gas pipeline capacity, etc.


19


Our utility operations are subject to long-term planning risks.

Our utility operations file long-term resource plans with our regulators.  These plans are based on numerous assumptions over the planning horizon such as: sales growth, customer usage, economic activity, costs, regulatory mechanisms, impact of technology, the installation of distributed generation, customer behavioral response and continuation of the existing utility business model. Given the uncertainty in these planning assumptions, there is a risk that the magnitude and timing of resource additions and demand may not coincide.  The addition of customer-site solar installations introduces additional downward pressure on load growth. This could lead to under recovery of costs and excess resources to meet customer demand. PSCo’s aging infrastructure may pose a risk to system reliability and expose us to premature financial obligations. PSCo is engaged in significant and ongoing infrastructure investment programs.

In addition, large industrial customers may leave our system and invest in their own on-site distributed generation or seek law changes to give them the authority to purchase directly from other suppliers or organized markets.  The recent low natural gas price environment has caused some customers to consider their options in this area, particularly customers with industrial processes using steam.  Wholesale customers may purchase directly from other suppliers and procure only transmission service from us.  These circumstances provide for greater long-term planning uncertainty related to future load growth.  Similarly, distributed solar generation may become an economic competitive threat to our load growth in the future. However, we believe the economics, absent significant subsidies, do not support such a trend in the near term unless a state mandates the purchase of such generation. Some states have considered such legislation.

Our natural gas transmission and distribution operations involve numerous risks that may result in accidents and other operating risks and costs.

Our natural gas transmission and distribution activities include a variety of inherent hazards and operating risks, such as leaks, explosions and mechanical problems, which could cause substantial financial losses.  In addition, these risks could result in loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, impairment of our operations and substantial losses to us.  We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses.

The occurrence of any of these events not fully covered by insurance could have a material effect on our financial position and results of operations. For our natural gas transmission or distribution lines located near populated areas the level of potential damages resulting from these risks is greater.

Additionally, the operating or other costs that may be required in order to comply with potential new regulations, including the Pipeline Safety Act, could be significant. The Pipeline Safety Act requires verification of pipeline infrastructure records by intrastate and interstate pipeline owners and operators to confirm the maximum allowable operating pressure of lines located in high consequence areas or more-densely populated areas. We have programs in place to comply with the Pipeline Safety Act and for systematic infrastructure monitoring and renewal over time. A significant incident could increase regulatory scrutiny and result in penalties and higher costs of operations.

As we are a subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc., we may be negatively affected by events impacting the credit or liquidity of Xcel Energy Inc. and its affiliates.

If Xcel Energy Inc. were to become obligated to make payments under various guarantees and bond indemnities or to fund its other contingent liabilities, or if either Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s were to downgrade Xcel Energy Inc.’s credit rating below investment grade, Xcel Energy Inc. may be required to provide credit enhancements in the form of cash collateral, letters of credit or other security to satisfy part or potentially all of these exposures.  If either Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s were to downgrade Xcel Energy Inc.’s debt securities below investment grade, it would increase Xcel Energy Inc.’s cost of capital and restrict its access to the capital markets. This could limit Xcel Energy Inc.’s ability to contribute equity or make loans to us, or may cause Xcel Energy Inc. to seek additional or accelerated funding from us in the form of dividends.  If such event were to occur, we may need to seek alternative sources of funds to meet our cash needs.

As of Dec. 31, 2014, Xcel Energy Inc. and its utility subsidiaries had approximately $11.5 billion of long-term debt and $1.3 billion of short-term debt and current maturities.  Xcel Energy Inc. provides various guarantees and bond indemnities supporting some of its subsidiaries by guaranteeing the payment or performance by these subsidiaries for specified agreements or transactions.


20


Xcel Energy also has other contingent liabilities resulting from various tax disputes and other matters.  Xcel Energy Inc.’s exposure under the guarantees is based upon the net liability of the relevant subsidiary under the specified agreements or transactions.  The majority of Xcel Energy Inc.’s guarantees limit its exposure to a maximum amount that is stated in the guarantees.  As of Dec. 31, 2014, Xcel Energy had guarantees outstanding with a maximum stated amount of approximately $13.9 million and $0.2 million of exposure. Xcel Energy also had additional guarantees of $31.4 million at Dec. 31, 2014 for performance and payment of surety bonds for the benefit of itself and its subsidiaries, with total exposure that cannot be estimated at this time.  If Xcel Energy Inc. were to become obligated to make payments under these guarantees and bond indemnities or become obligated to fund other contingent liabilities, it could limit Xcel Energy Inc.’s ability to contribute equity or make loans to us, or may cause Xcel Energy Inc. to seek additional or accelerated funding from us in the form of dividends.  If such event were to occur, we may need to seek alternative sources of funds to meet our cash needs.

We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc.  Xcel Energy Inc. can exercise substantial control over our dividend policy and business and operations and may exercise that control in a manner that may be perceived to be adverse to our interests.

All of the members of our Board of Directors, as well as many of our executive officers, are officers of Xcel Energy Inc.  Our Board makes determinations with respect to a number of significant corporate events, including the payment of our dividends.

We have historically paid quarterly dividends to Xcel Energy Inc.  In 2014, 2013 and 2012 we paid $433.8 million, $263.9 million and $267.0 million of dividends to Xcel Energy Inc., respectively.  If Xcel Energy Inc.’s cash requirements increase, our Board of Directors could decide to increase the dividends we pay to Xcel Energy Inc. to help support Xcel Energy Inc.’s cash needs.  This could adversely affect our liquidity. The most restrictive dividend limitation for PSCo is imposed by its credit facility, which limits the debt-to-total capitalization ratio. See Item 5 for further discussion on dividend limitations.

Public Policy Risks

We may be subject to legislative and regulatory responses to climate change and emissions, with which compliance could be difficult and costly.

Increased public awareness and concern regarding climate change may result in more regional and/or federal requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of GHGs. Legislative and regulatory responses related to climate change and new interpretations of existing laws through climate change litigation create financial risk as our electric generating facilities may be subject to additional regulation under climate change laws at either the state or federal level in the future. The EPA is regulating GHGs under the CAA. The EPA has regulated GHG emissions from motor vehicles and has proposed regulations to reduce GHG emissions from existing power plants that are expected to become final in 2015, with state plans to achieve the EPA’s goals due by 2017. Such regulations could impose substantial costs on our system. The EPA has also proposed regulations that would establish NSPS for any new fossil fuel-fired power plants that may be built which may be adopted in 2015. If adopted, these regulations could significantly increase the cost of building new generating plants.

The United States continues to participate in international negotiations related to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). In 2014, the United States and China jointly announced GHG emissions goals. Further, the 20th Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UNFCCC concluded with the objective of developing an agreement among countries on emission reductions at the 2015 COP. This could result in additional GHG regulation or reduction goals in the United States.

We have been, and in the future may be subject to climate change lawsuits. An adverse outcome in any of these cases could require substantial capital expenditures and could possibly require payment of substantial penalties or damages. Defense costs associated with such litigation can also be significant. Such payments or expenditures could affect results of operations, cash flows and financial condition if such costs are not recovered through regulated rates.


21


There are many uncertainties regarding when and in what form climate change legislation or regulations will be imposed. The impact of legislation and regulations will depend on a number of factors, including what GHG emission reduction goals are set, what flexibility is allowed to meet the goals, how and whether early action to reduce GHG emissions is credited, whether GHG sources in other sectors of the economy are regulated, the degree to which GHG offsets are recognized as compliance options, how any emission allowances would be allocated to specific sources and the indirect impact of carbon regulation on natural gas and coal prices. In addition, international treaties or accords could have an impact to the extent they lead to future federal or state regulations. Another important factor is our ability to recover the costs incurred to comply with any regulatory requirements in a timely manner. If our regulators do not allow us to recover all or a part of the cost of capital investment or the O&M costs incurred to comply with the mandates, it could have a material effect on our results of operations

We are also subject to a significant number of proposed and potential rules that will impact our coal-fired and other generation facilities. These include rules associated with emissions of SO2 and NOx, mercury, regional haze, ozone and particulate matter, water discharges and ash management. The costs of investment to comply with these rules could be substantial and in some cases would lead to early retirement of coal units.. We may not be able to timely recover all costs related to complying with regulatory requirements imposed on us.

Increased risks of regulatory penalties could negatively impact our business.

The Energy Act increased civil penalty authority for violation of FERC statutes, rules and orders.  The FERC can now impose penalties of up to $1 million per violation per day.  In addition, NERC electric reliability standards are now mandatory and subject to potential financial penalties by regional entities, the NERC or the FERC for violations.  If a serious reliability incident did occur, it could have a material effect on our operations or financial results. Some states have the authority to impose substantial penalties in the event of non-compliance.

We attempt to mitigate the risk of regulatory penalties through formal training on such prohibited practices and a compliance function that reviews our interaction with the markets under FERC and CFTC jurisdictions.  However, there is no guarantee our compliance program will be sufficient to ensure against violations.

Macroeconomic Risks

Economic conditions impact our business.

Our operations are affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions both positively and negatively. Growth in our customer base is correlated with economic conditions. While the number of customers is growing, sales growth is relatively modest due to an increased focus on energy efficiency including federal standards for appliance and lighting efficiency and distributed generation, primarily solar PV. Instability in the financial markets also may affect the cost of capital and our ability to raise capital, which are discussed in the capital market risk section above.

Economic conditions may be impacted by insufficient financial sector liquidity leading to potential increased unemployment, which may impact customers’ ability to pay timely, increase customer bankruptcies, and may lead to increased bad debt.

Further, worldwide economic activity has an impact on the demand for basic commodities needed for utility infrastructure, such as steel, copper, aluminum, etc., which may impact our ability to acquire sufficient supplies.  Additionally, the cost of those commodities may be higher than expected.


22


Our operations could be impacted by war, acts of terrorism, threats of terrorism or disruptions in normal operating conditions due to localized or regional events.

Our generation plants, fuel storage facilities, transmission and distribution facilities and information systems may be targets of terrorist activities that could disrupt our ability to produce or distribute some portion of our energy products.  Any such disruption could result in a decrease in revenues and additional costs to repair and insure our assets. These disruptions could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.  The potential for terrorism has subjected our operations to increased risks and could have a material effect on our business.  We have already incurred increased costs for security and capital expenditures in response to these risks. In addition, we may experience additional capital and operating costs to implement security for our plants, such as additional physical plant security and additional security personnel.  We have also already incurred increased costs for compliance with NERC reliability standards associated with critical infrastructure protection, and may experience additional capital and operating costs to comply with the NERC critical infrastructure protection standards as they are implemented and clarified.

The insurance industry has also been affected by these events and the availability of insurance may decrease.  In addition, the insurance we are able to obtain may have higher deductibles, higher premiums and more restrictive policy terms.

A disruption of the regional electric transmission grid, interstate natural gas pipeline infrastructure or other fuel sources, could negatively impact our business.  Because our generation, transmission systems and local natural gas distribution companies are part of an interconnected system, we face the risk of possible loss of business due to a disruption caused by the actions of a neighboring utility or an event (severe storm, severe temperature extremes, generator or transmission facility outage, pipeline rupture, railroad disruption, sudden and significant increase or decrease in wind generation, or any disruption of work force such as may be caused by flu or other epidemic) within our operating systems or on a neighboring system.  Any such disruption could result in a significant decrease in revenues and significant additional costs to repair assets, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and results.

The degree to which we are able to maintain day-to-day operations in response to unforeseen events will in part determine the financial impact of certain events on our financial condition and results. It is difficult to predict the magnitude of such events and associated impacts.

A cyber incident or cyber security breach could have a material effect on our business.

We operate in an industry that requires the continued operation of sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure.  In addition, we use our systems and infrastructure to create, collect, use, disclose, store, dispose of and otherwise process sensitive information, including company data, customer energy usage data, and personal information regarding customers, employees and their dependents, contractors and other individuals.

Our generation, transmission, distribution and fuel storage facilities, information technology systems and other infrastructure or physical assets, as well as the information processed in our systems (e.g., information about our customers, employees, operations, infrastructure and assets) could be affected by cyber security incidents, including those caused by human error. Our industry has begun to see an increased volume and sophistication of cyber security incidents from international activist organizations, Nation States, and individuals. Cyber security incidents could harm our businesses by limiting our generating, transmitting and distributing capabilities, delaying our development and construction of new facilities or capital improvement projects to existing facilities, disrupting our customer operations, or exposing us to liability. Our generation, transmission systems and natural gas pipelines are part of an interconnected system. Therefore, a disruption caused by the impact of a cyber security incident of the regional electric transmission grid, natural gas pipeline infrastructure or other fuel sources of our third party service providers’ operations, could also negatively impact our business.  In addition, such an event would likely receive regulatory scrutiny at both the federal and state level.  We are unable to quantify the potential impact of cyber security threats or subsequent related actions.  These potential cyber security incidents and corresponding regulatory action could result in a material decrease in revenues and may cause significant additional costs (e.g., penalties, third party claims, repairs, insurance or compliance) and potentially disrupt our supply and markets for natural gas, oil and other fuels.


23


We maintain security measures designed to protect our information technology systems, network infrastructure and other assets. However, these assets and the information they process may be vulnerable to cyber security incidents, including the resulting disability, or failures of assets or unauthorized access to assets or information.   If our technology systems were to fail or be breached, or those of our third-party service providers, we may be unable to fulfill critical business functions, including effectively maintaining certain internal controls over financial reporting. We are unable to quantify the potential impact of cyber security incidents on our business.

Rising energy prices could negatively impact our business.

While we have fuel clause recovery mechanisms, higher fuel costs could significantly impact our results of operations if costs are not recovered.  In addition, higher fuel costs could reduce customer demand and/or increase bad debt expense, which could also have a material impact on our results of operations. Delays in the timing of the collection of fuel cost recoveries as compared with expenditures for fuel purchases could have an impact on our cash flows.  We are unable to predict future prices or the ultimate impact of such prices on our results of operations or cash flows.

Our operating results may fluctuate on a seasonal and quarterly basis and can be adversely affected by milder weather.

Our electric and natural gas utility businesses are seasonal, and weather patterns can have a material impact on our operating performance. Demand for electricity is often greater in the summer and winter months associated with cooling and heating.  Because natural gas is heavily used for residential and commercial heating, the demand for this product depends heavily upon weather patterns throughout our service territory, and a significant amount of natural gas revenues are recognized in the first and fourth quarters related to the heating season. Accordingly, our operations have historically generated less revenues and income when weather conditions are milder in the winter and cooler in the summer.  Unusually mild winters and summers could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 1B — Unresolved Staff Comments

None.


24


Item 2 — Properties

Virtually all of the utility plant property of PSCo is subject to the lien of its first mortgage bond indenture.
Electric Utility Generating Stations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Station, Location and Unit
 
Fuel
 
Installed
 
Summer 2014
Net Dependable
Capability (MW)
 
Steam:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cherokee-Denver, Colo., 2 Units
 
Coal
 
1957-1968
 
504

 
Comanche-Pueblo, Colo.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unit 1
 
Coal
 
1973
 
325

 
Unit 2
 
Coal
 
1975
 
335

 
Unit 3
 
Coal
 
2010
 
500

 (a)
Craig-Craig, Colo., 2 Units
 
Coal
 
1979-1980
 
83

 (b)
Hayden-Hayden, Colo., 2 Units
 
Coal
 
1965-1976
 
237

 (c)
Pawnee-Brush, Colo., 1 Unit
 
Coal
 
1981
 
505

 
Valmont-Boulder, Colo., 1 Unit
 
Coal
 
1964
 
184

 
Zuni-Denver, Colo., 1 Unit
 
Coal
 
1948-1954
 
59

 
Combustion Turbine:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Blue Spruce-Aurora, Colo., 2 Units
 
Natural Gas
 
2003
 
264

 
Fort St. Vrain-Platteville, Colo., 6 Units
 
Natural Gas
 
1972-2009
 
969

 
Rocky Mountain-Keenesburg, Colo., 3 Units
 
Natural Gas
 
2004
 
580

 
Various locations, 6 Units
 
Natural Gas
 
Various
 
172

 
Hydro:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cabin Creek-Georgetown, Colo.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pumped Storage, 2 Units
 
Hydro
 
1967
 
210

 
Various locations, 9 Units
 
Hydro
 
Various
 
26

 
Wind:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ponnequin-Weld County, Colo., 37 Units
 
Wind
 
1999-2001
 
25

 (d)
 
 
 
 
Total
 
4,978

 
(a) 
Based on PSCo’s ownership interest of 67 percent of Unit 3.
(b)
Based on PSCo’s ownership interest of 10 percent.
(c)
Based on PSCo’s ownership interest of 76 percent of Unit 1 and 37 percent of Unit 2.
(d)
This capacity is only available when wind conditions are sufficiently high enough to support the noted generation values above.  Therefore, the on-demand net dependable capacity is zero.

Electric utility overhead and underground transmission and distribution lines (measured in conductor miles) at Dec. 31, 2014:
Conductor Miles
 
345 KV
2,630

230 KV
12,162

138 KV
92

115 KV
4,889

Less than 115 KV
75,110


PSCo had 229 electric utility transmission and distribution substations at Dec. 31, 2014.

Natural gas utility mains at Dec. 31, 2014:
Miles
 
Transmission
2,258

Distribution
21,844



25


Item 3 — Legal Proceedings

PSCo is involved in various litigation matters that are being defended and handled in the ordinary course of business.  The assessment of whether a loss is probable or is a reasonable possibility, and whether the loss or a range of loss is estimable, often involves a series of complex judgments about future events.  Management maintains accruals for such losses that are probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation.  Management is sometimes unable to estimate an amount or range of a reasonably possible loss in certain situations, including but not limited to when (1) the damages sought are indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages, or (3) the matters involve novel or unsettled legal theories.  In such cases, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the timing or ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss.

Additional Information

See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of legal claims and environmental proceedings.  See Item 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of proceedings involving utility rates and other regulatory matters.

Item 4 — Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

PART II

Item 5 — Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

PSCo is a wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc. and there is no market for its common equity securities. PSCo’s dividends are subject to the FERC’s jurisdiction under the Federal Power Act, which prohibits the payment of dividends out of capital accounts; payment of dividends is allowed out of retained earnings only.

See Note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of PSCo’s dividend policy.

The dividends declared during 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
First quarter
 
$
194,022

 
$
66,678

Second quarter
 
96,391

 
65,461

Third quarter
 
78,241

 
65,000

Fourth quarter
 
83,652

 
65,134


Item 6 — Selected Financial Data

This is omitted per conditions set forth in general instructions I (1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K for wholly owned subsidiaries (reduced disclosure format).

Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Discussion of financial condition and liquidity for PSCo is omitted per conditions set forth in general instructions I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K for wholly owned subsidiaries.  It is replaced with management’s narrative analysis of the results of operations set forth in general instructions I(2)(a) of Form 10-K for wholly owned subsidiaries (reduced disclosure format).

Financial Review

The following discussion and analysis by management focuses on those factors that had a material effect on PSCo’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows during the periods presented, or are expected to have a material impact in the future.  It should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements.


26


Forward-Looking Statements

Except for the historical statements contained in this report, the matters discussed in the following discussion and analysis are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions.  Such forward-looking statements are intended to be identified in this document by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” “possible,” “potential,” “should” and similar expressions.  Actual results may vary materially.  Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update them to reflect changes that occur after that date.  Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions, including inflation rates, monetary fluctuations and their impact on capital expenditures and the ability of PSCo and its subsidiaries to obtain financing on favorable terms; business conditions in the energy industry, including the risk of slowdown in the U.S. economy or delay in growth recovery; actions of credit rating agencies; trade, fiscal, taxation and environmental policies in areas where PSCo has a financial interest; customer business conditions; competitive factors, including the extent and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets served by PSCo and its subsidiaries; unusual weather; effects of geopolitical events, including war and acts of terrorism; cyber security threats and data security breaches; state, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an impact on rates, or have an impact on asset operation or ownership or impose environmental compliance conditions; structures that affect the speed and degree to which competition enters the electric and natural gas markets; costs and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims; financial or regulatory accounting policies imposed by regulatory bodies; availability or cost of capital; employee work force factors; and the other risk factors listed from time to time by PSCo in reports filed with the SEC, including “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Exhibit 99.01 hereto.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

PSCo’s net income was approximately $455.2 million for 2014, compared with approximately $453.4 million for 2013.  The increase is mainly due to higher natural gas and electric margins primarily due to rate increases, higher AFUDC, lower O&M expenses and weather-normalized sales growth. These factors were partially offset by higher property taxes, depreciation, accruals associated with the electric earnings test refund obligations and the unfavorable impact of weather.

Electric Revenues and Margin

Electric revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses are largely impacted by the fluctuation in the price of natural gas and coal used in the generation of electricity, but as a result of the design of fuel recovery mechanisms to recover current expenses, these price fluctuations have little impact on electric margin.  The following table details the electric revenues and margin:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Electric revenues
 
$
3,126

 
$
3,081

Electric fuel and purchased power
 
(1,405
)
 
(1,336
)
Electric margin
 
$
1,721

 
$
1,745


The following tables summarize the components of the changes in electric revenues and electric margin for the year ended Dec. 31:

Electric Revenues
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014 vs. 2013
Fuel and purchased power cost recovery
 
$
84

Non-fuel riders
 
9

Transmission revenue
 
8

Retail sales growth, excluding weather impact
 
7

Estimated impact of weather
 
(30
)
Trading, including REC sales
 
(23
)
Retail rate increase (net of estimated earnings test refund obligations)
 
(13
)
Other, net
 
3

Total increase in electric revenues
 
$
45



27


Electric Margin
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014 vs. 2013
Estimated impact of weather
 
$
(30
)
Retail rate increase (net of estimated earnings test refund obligations)
 
(13
)
Trading, including REC sales
 
(8
)
Non-fuel riders
 
9

Transmission revenue, net of costs
 
8

Retail sales growth, excluding weather impact
 
7

Other, net
 
3

Total decrease in electric margin
 
$
(24
)

Natural Gas Revenues and Margin

The cost of natural gas tends to vary with changing sales requirements and the cost of natural gas purchases.  However, due to the design of purchased natural gas cost recovery mechanisms to recover current expenses for sales to retail customers, fluctuations in the cost of natural gas have little effect on natural gas margin.  The following table details natural gas revenues and margin:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Natural gas revenues
 
$
1,215

 
$
1,081

Cost of natural gas sold and transported
 
(726
)
 
(621
)
Natural gas margin
 
$
489

 
$
460


The following tables summarize the components of the changes in natural gas revenues and natural gas margin for the year ended Dec. 31:

Natural Gas Revenues
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014 vs. 2013
Purchased natural gas adjustment clause recovery
 
$
106

Retail rate increase
 
19

PSIA rider (offset by expense)
 
14

Retail sales growth, excluding weather impact
 
7

Estimated impact of weather
 
(7
)
Other, net
 
(5
)
Total increase in natural gas revenues
 
$
134


Natural Gas Margin
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014 vs. 2013
Retail rate increase
 
$
19

PSIA rider (offset by expenses)
 
14

Retail sales growth, excluding weather impact
 
7

Estimated impact of weather
 
(7
)
Other, net
 
(4
)
Total increase in natural gas margin
 
$
29



28


Non-Fuel Operating Expenses and Other Items

O&M Expenses O&M expenses decreased by $10.5 million, or 1.4 percent, for 2014 compared with the same period in 2013.  The following table summarizes the changes in O&M expenses:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014 vs. 2013
Employee benefits
 
$
(12
)
Plant generation costs
 
(2
)
Other, net
 
3

Total decrease in O&M expenses
 
$
(11
)

Lower employee benefits resulted primarily from decreases in pension expense and retiree medical costs.

DSM Program Expenses DSM program expenses increased $0.4 million, or 0.3 percent, for 2014 compared with 2013.  The higher expense is primarily attributable to an increase in the electric rate used to recover program expenses.  DSM program expenses are recovered concurrently through riders and base rates.

Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $18.8 million, or 5.2 percent, for 2014 compared with 2013.  The increase is primarily attributable to normal system expansion.

Taxes (Other Than Income Taxes) Taxes (other than income taxes) increased by $24.1 million, or 17.5 percent, for 2014 compared with 2013. The increase is primarily due to higher property taxes.

AFUDC — AFUDC increased by $18.2 million for 2014 compared with 2013.  The increase is primarily due to construction related to the CACJA.

Interest Charges Interest charges decreased by $1.7 million, or 1.0 percent, for 2014 compared with 2013.  The decrease is primarily due to refinancings at lower interest rates, partially offset by higher long-term debt levels.

Income Taxes — Income tax expense decreased $7.1 million for 2014 compared with 2013.  The decrease in income tax expense was primarily due to lower pretax earnings in 2014 and increased permanent plant-related adjustments in 2014  The ETR was 34.9 percent 2014 compared with 35.6 percent for 2013 due to these adjustments.

Item 7A — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Derivatives, Risk Management and Market Risk

PSCo is exposed to a variety of market risks in the normal course of business.  Market risk is the potential loss that may occur as a result of adverse changes in the market or fair value of a particular instrument or commodity.  All financial and commodity-related instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market risk.  See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of market risks associated with derivatives.

PSCo is exposed to the impact of adverse changes in price for energy and energy-related products, which is partially mitigated by the use of commodity derivatives.  In addition to ongoing monitoring and maintaining credit policies intended to minimize overall credit risk, when necessary, management takes steps to mitigate changes in credit and concentration risks associated with its derivatives and other contracts, including parental guarantees and requests of collateral.  While PSCo expects that the counterparties will perform under the contracts underlying its derivatives, the contracts expose PSCo to some credit and nonperformance risk.

Though no material non-performance risk currently exists with the counterparties to PSCo’s commodity derivative contracts, distress in the financial markets may in the future impact that risk to the extent it impacts those counterparties.  Distress in the financial markets may also impact the fair value of the securities in the master pension trust, as well as PSCo’s ability to earn a return on short-term investments of excess cash.


29


Commodity Price Risk — PSCo is exposed to commodity price risk in its electric and natural gas operations.  Commodity price risk is managed by entering into long- and short-term physical purchase and sales contracts for electric capacity, energy and energy-related products and for various fuels used in generation and distribution activities.  Commodity price risk is also managed through the use of financial derivative instruments.  PSCo’s risk management policy allows it to manage commodity price risk within each rate-regulated operation to the extent such exposure exists.

Wholesale and Commodity Trading Risk — PSCo conducts various wholesale and commodity trading activities, including the purchase and sale of electric capacity, energy and energy-related instruments.  PSCo’s risk management policy allows management to conduct these activities within guidelines and limitations as approved by its risk management committee, which is made up of management personnel not directly involved in the activities governed by the policy.

Changes in the fair value of commodity trading contracts before the impacts of margin-sharing mechanisms for the years ended Dec. 31, were as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Fair value of commodity trading net contract assets outstanding at Jan. 1
 
$
318

 
$
792

Contracts realized or settled during the period
 
(500
)
 
4,986

Commodity trading contract additions and changes during the period
 
182

 
(5,460
)
Fair value of commodity trading net contract assets outstanding at Dec. 31
 
$

 
$
318


At Dec. 31, 2014, there were no net commodity trading contract assets outstanding. At Dec. 31, 2013, a 10 percent increase or decrease in market prices for commodity trading contracts would have an immaterial impact on pretax income from continuing operations.

PSCo’s wholesale and commodity trading operations measure the outstanding risk exposure to price changes on transactions, contracts and obligations that have been entered into, but not closed, including transactions that are not recorded at fair value, using an industry standard methodology known as Value at Risk (VaR).  VaR expresses the potential change in fair value on the outstanding transactions, contracts and obligations over a particular period of time under normal market conditions.  The VaRs for the NSP-Minnesota and PSCo commodity trading operations, calculated on a consolidated basis using a Monte Carlo simulation with a 95 percent confidence level and a one-day holding period, were as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
Year Ended
Dec. 31
 
VaR Limit
 
Average
 
High
 
Low
2013
 
$
0.29

 
$
3.00

 
$
0.41

 
$
1.65

 
$
< 0.01

Interest Rate Risk — PSCo is subject to the risk of fluctuating interest rates in the normal course of business.  PSCo’s risk management policy allows interest rate risk to be managed through the use of fixed rate debt, floating rate debt and interest rate derivatives such as swaps, caps, collars and put or call options.

At Dec. 31, 2014, a 100-basis-point change in the benchmark rate on PSCo’s variable rate debt would impact annual pretax interest expense by approximately $3.8 million, and at Dec. 31, 2013 a 100-basis-point change in the benchmark rate on PSCo’s variable rate debt would have no impact on pretax interest expense. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of PSCo’s interest rate derivatives.

Credit Risk — PSCo is also exposed to credit risk.  Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from counterparties’ nonperformance on their contractual obligations.  PSCo maintains credit policies intended to minimize overall credit risk and actively monitors these policies to reflect changes and scope of operations.

At Dec. 31, 2014, a 10 percent increase in commodity prices would have resulted in an increase in credit exposure of $13.6 million, while a decrease in prices of 10 percent would have resulted in a decrease in credit exposure of $4.1 million.  At Dec. 31, 2013, a 10 percent increase in commodity prices would have resulted in an increase in credit exposure of $9.3 million, while a decrease in prices of 10 percent would have resulted in a decrease in credit exposure of $1.4 million.


30


PSCo conducts standard credit reviews for all counterparties.  PSCo employs additional credit risk control mechanisms when appropriate, such as letters of credit, parental guarantees, standardized master netting agreements and termination provisions that allow for offsetting of positive and negative exposures.  Credit exposure is monitored and, when necessary, the activity with a specific counterparty is limited until credit enhancement is provided.  Distress in the financial markets could increase PSCo’s credit risk.

Fair Value Measurements

PSCo follows accounting and disclosure guidance on fair value measurements that contains a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value and requires disclosure of the observability of the inputs used in these measurements.  See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the fair value hierarchy and the amounts of assets and liabilities measured at fair value that have been assigned to Level 3.

Commodity Derivatives — PSCo continuously monitors the creditworthiness of the counterparties to its commodity derivative contracts and assesses each counterparty’s ability to perform on the transactions set forth in the contracts.  Given this assessment and the typically short duration of these contracts, the impact of discounting commodity derivative assets for counterparty credit risk was not material to the fair value of commodity derivative assets at Dec. 31, 2014.  PSCo also assesses the impact of its own credit risk when determining the fair value of commodity derivative liabilities.  The impact of discounting commodity derivative liabilities for credit risk was immaterial to the fair value of commodity derivative liabilities at Dec. 31, 2014.

Commodity derivative assets and liabilities assigned to Level 3 typically consist of forwards and options that are long-term in nature. Determining the fair value of certain commodity forwards and options can require management to make use of subjective price and volatility forecasts which extend to periods beyond those readily observable on active exchanges or quoted by brokers.  When less observable forward price and volatility forecasts are significant to determining the value of commodity forwards and options, these instruments are assigned to Level 3.  There were no Level 3 commodity derivative assets or liabilities at Dec. 31, 2014.

Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See Item 15-1 in Part IV for an index of financial statements included herein.

See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for summarized quarterly financial data.


31


Management Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

The management of PSCo is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. PSCo’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Xcel Energy Inc.’s and PSCo’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

PSCo management assessed the effectiveness of PSCo’s internal control over financial reporting as of Dec. 31, 2014. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo’s internal control over financial reporting is effective at the reasonable assurance level based on those criteria.

/s/ BEN FOWKE
 
/s/ TERESA S. MADDEN
Ben Fowke
 
Teresa S. Madden
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Feb. 20, 2015
 
Feb. 20, 2015


32


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Public Service Company of Colorado

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Public Service Company of Colorado and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and common stockholder’s equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014.  Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Public Service Company of Colorado and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Minneapolis, Minnesota
 
February 20, 2015
 


33


PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(amounts in thousands)
 
Year Ended Dec. 31
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Operating revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Electric
$
3,125,937

 
$
3,081,171

 
$
2,969,899

Natural gas
1,215,324

 
1,080,703

 
962,435

Steam and other
41,888

 
40,754

 
36,959

Total operating revenues
4,383,149

 
4,202,628

 
3,969,293

 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Electric fuel and purchased power
1,405,498

 
1,335,818

 
1,235,343

Cost of natural gas sold and transported
725,754

 
621,120

 
532,417

Cost of sales — steam and other
16,831

 
17,039

 
15,438

Operating and maintenance expenses
751,786

 
762,322

 
742,975

Demand side management program expenses
139,780

 
139,337

 
123,205

Depreciation and amortization
379,202

 
360,417

 
338,827

Taxes (other than income taxes)
161,928

 
137,816

 
131,869

Total operating expenses
3,580,779

 
3,373,869

 
3,120,074

 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income
802,370

 
828,759

 
849,219

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income, net
4,265

 
3,136

 
4,736

Allowance for funds used during construction —  equity
46,784

 
33,173

 
16,354

 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest charges and financing costs
 
 
 
 
 
Interest charges — includes other financing costs of
$6,340, $6,866, and $7,088, respectively
171,881

 
173,602

 
188,094

Allowance for funds used during construction — debt
(17,241
)
 
(12,657
)
 
(8,405
)
Total interest charges and financing costs
154,640

 
160,945

 
179,689

 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before income taxes
698,779

 
704,123

 
690,620

Income taxes
243,591

 
250,740

 
232,544

Net income
$
455,188

 
$
453,383

 
$
458,076


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

34


PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(amounts in thousands)
 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Net income
 
$
455,188

 
$
453,383

 
$
458,076

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net fair value (decrease) increase, net of tax of $(43), $5 and $(5,708), respectively
 
(72
)
 
9

 
(9,311
)
Reclassification of gains to net income, net of tax of $(287), $(294) and $(725), respectively
 
(468
)
 
(476
)
 
(1,183
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive loss
 
(540
)
 
(467
)
 
(10,494
)
Comprehensive income
 
$
454,648

 
$
452,916

 
$
447,582


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


35


PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts in thousands)
 
Year Ended Dec. 31
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
455,188

 
$
453,383

 
$
458,076

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
383,992

 
365,713

 
344,226

Demand side management program amortization
4,331

 
4,802

 
5,299

Deferred income taxes
227,823

 
316,253

 
38,092

Amortization of investment tax credits
(2,941
)
 
(2,935
)
 
(2,957
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
(46,784
)
 
(33,173
)
 
(16,354
)
Provision for bad debts
17,005

 
16,784

 
16,323

SmartGridCity

 

 
10,666

Net realized and unrealized hedging and derivative transactions
(2,578
)
 
(3,571
)
 
(39,338
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(42,921
)
 
5,089

 
(58,226
)
Accrued unbilled revenues
(23,132
)
 
14,707

 
18,920

Inventories
(972
)
 
(14,857
)
 
30,203

Prepayments and other
(81,715
)
 
(7,210
)
 
(3,466
)
Accounts payable
(22,789
)
 
59,361

 
(56,176
)
Net regulatory assets and liabilities
130,499

 
108,400

 
(31,776
)
Other current liabilities
5,284

 
16,561

 
34,305

Pension and other employee benefit obligations
(38,905
)
 
(48,886
)
 
(57,974
)
Change in other noncurrent assets
5,537

 
3,862

 
(10,101
)
Change in other noncurrent liabilities
(19,130
)
 
17,191

 
(1,267
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
947,792

 
1,271,474

 
678,475

 
 
 
 
 
 
Investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
Utility capital/construction expenditures
(1,114,338
)
 
(1,066,700
)
 
(873,383
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
46,784

 
33,173

 
16,354

Investments in utility money pool arrangement
(603,000
)
 
(1,495,000
)
 
(1,000,000
)
Repayments from utility money pool arrangement
659,000

 
1,423,000

 
1,052,000

Net cash used in investing activities
(1,011,554
)
 
(1,105,527
)
 
(805,029
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings, net
382,000

 
(154,000
)
 
154,000

Borrowings under utility money pool arrangement
333,000

 
14,000

 
36,000

Repayments under utility money pool arrangement
(333,000
)
 
(14,000
)
 
(36,000
)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
295,598

 
492,313

 
790,379

Repayments of long-term debt
(275,000
)
 
(250,000
)
 
(648,750
)
Capital contributions from parent
81,498

 
25,621

 
99,283

Dividends paid to parent
(433,788
)
 
(263,942
)
 
(266,971
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
50,308

 
(150,008
)
 
127,941

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(13,454
)
 
15,939

 
1,387

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
21,089

 
5,150

 
3,763

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
7,635

 
$
21,089

 
$
5,150

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized)
$
(150,011
)
 
$
(155,457
)
 
$
(179,610
)
Cash (paid) received for income taxes, net
(91,810
)
 
34,946

 
(179,321
)
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing transactions:
 
 
 
 
 
Property, plant and equipment additions in accounts payable
$
139,616

 
$
142,103

 
$
94,288


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

36


PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
Dec. 31
 
2014
 
2013
Assets
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
7,635

 
$
21,089

Accounts receivable, net
322,885

 
328,675

Accounts receivable from affiliates
50,842

 
19,136

Investments in utility money pool arrangement
16,000

 
72,000

Accrued unbilled revenues
294,049

 
270,917

Inventories
238,979

 
238,007

Regulatory assets
120,120

 
150,163

Deferred income taxes
64,587

 
87,267

Derivative instruments
1,731

 
6,576

Prepaid taxes
90,365

 
9,439

Prepayments and other
23,979

 
23,190

Total current assets
1,231,172

 
1,226,459

 
 
 
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
11,626,956

 
10,742,397

 
 
 
 
Other assets
 

 
 

Regulatory assets
903,973

 
826,037

Derivative instruments
5,176

 
6,905

Other
48,506

 
52,520

Total other assets
957,655

 
885,462

Total assets
$
13,815,783

 
$
12,854,318

 
 
 
 
Liabilities and Equity
 

 
 

Current liabilities
 

 
 

Current portion of long-term debt
$
8,178

 
$
282,143

Short-term debt
382,000

 

Accounts payable
425,133

 
451,243

Accounts payable to affiliates
46,736

 
45,902

Regulatory liabilities
134,459

 
79,499

Taxes accrued
159,470

 
154,194

Accrued interest
48,409

 
48,492

Dividends payable to parent
83,652

 
65,134

Derivative instruments
5,774

 
6,734

Other
72,002

 
89,571

Total current liabilities
1,365,813

 
1,222,912

 
 
 
 
Deferred credits and other liabilities
 

 
 

Deferred income taxes
2,437,641

 
2,206,179

Deferred investment tax credits
36,273

 
39,230

Regulatory liabilities
464,421

 
424,690

Asset retirement obligations
225,296

 
60,398

Derivative instruments
18,257

 
23,366

Customer advances
229,990

 
251,062

Pension and employee benefit obligations
202,031

 
167,127

Other
68,171

 
66,855

Total deferred credits and other liabilities
3,682,080

 
3,238,907

 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies


 


Capitalization
 

 
 

Long-term debt
3,882,051

 
3,590,500

Common stock — 100 shares authorized of $0.01 par value; 100 shares
outstanding at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

 

Additional paid in capital
3,522,788

 
3,441,290

Retained earnings
1,386,929

 
1,384,047

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(23,878
)
 
(23,338
)
Total common stockholder’s equity
4,885,839

 
4,801,999

Total liabilities and equity
$
13,815,783

 
$
12,854,318


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

37


PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
Common Stock Issued
 
 
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
Common
Stockholder’s
Equity
 
Shares
 
Par Value
 
Additional
Paid In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
 
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011
100

 
$

 
$
3,316,386

 
$
1,001,709

 
$
(12,377
)
 
$
4,305,718

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
458,076

 
 
 
458,076

Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(10,494
)
 
(10,494
)
Common dividends declared to parent
 
 
 
 
 
 
(266,848
)
 
 
 
(266,848
)
Contribution of capital by parent
 
 
 
 
99,283

 
 
 
 
 
99,283

Balance at Dec. 31, 2012
100

 
$

 
$
3,415,669

 
$
1,192,937

 
$
(22,871
)
 
$
4,585,735

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
453,383

 
 
 
453,383

Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(467
)
 
(467
)
Common dividends declared to parent
 
 
 
 
 
 
(262,273
)
 
 
 
(262,273
)
Contribution of capital by parent
 
 
 
 
25,621

 
 
 
 
 
25,621

Balance at Dec. 31, 2013
100

 
$

 
$
3,441,290

 
$
1,384,047

 
$
(23,338
)
 
$
4,801,999

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
455,188

 
 
 
455,188

Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(540
)
 
(540
)
Common dividends declared to parent
 
 
 
 
 
 
(452,306
)
 
 
 
(452,306
)
Contribution of capital by parent
 
 
 
 
81,498

 
 
 
 
 
81,498

Balance at Dec. 31, 2014
100

 
$

 
$
3,522,788

 
$
1,386,929

 
$
(23,878
)
 
$
4,885,839


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

38


PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
Dec. 31
 
2014
 
2013
Long-Term Debt
 
 
 
First Mortgage Bonds, Series due:
 
 
 
April 1, 2014, 5.5%
$

 
$
275,000

Sept. 1, 2017, 4.375% (a)
129,500

 
129,500

Aug. 1, 2018, 5.8%
300,000

 
300,000

June 1, 2019, 5.125%
400,000

 
400,000

Nov. 15, 2020, 3.2%
400,000

 
400,000

Sept. 15, 2022, 2.25%
300,000

 
300,000

March 15, 2023, 2.5%
250,000

 
250,000

Sept. 1, 2037, 6.25%
350,000

 
350,000

Aug. 1, 2038, 6.5%
300,000

 
300,000

Aug. 15, 2041, 4.75%
250,000

 
250,000

Sept. 15, 2042, 3.6%
500,000

 
500,000

March 15, 2043, 3.95%
250,000

 
250,000

March 15, 2044, 4.3%
300,000

 

Capital lease obligations, through 2060, 11.2% — 14.3%
172,209

 
179,444

Unamortized discount
(11,480
)
 
(11,301
)
Total
3,890,229

 
3,872,643

Less current maturities
8,178

 
282,143

Total long-term debt
$
3,882,051

 
$
3,590,500

Common Stockholder’s Equity
 

 
 

Common Stock — 100 shares authorized of $0.01 par value; 100 shares
outstanding at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
$

 
$

Additional paid-in capital
3,522,788

 
3,441,290

Retained earnings
1,386,929

 
1,384,047

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(23,878
)
 
(23,338
)
Total common stockholder’s equity
$
4,885,839

 
$
4,801,999


(a) 
Pollution control financing.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

39


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business and System of Accounts — PSCo is engaged in the regulated generation, purchase, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and in the regulated purchase, transportation, distribution and sale of natural gas.  PSCo’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures are presented in accordance with GAAP.  All of PSCo’s underlying accounting records also conform to the FERC uniform system of accounts or to systems required by various state regulatory commissions, which are the same in all material respects.

Principles of Consolidation — PSCo’s consolidated financial statements include its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  In the consolidation process, all intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated.  PSCo has investments in several plants and transmission facilities jointly owned with nonaffiliated utilities.  PSCo’s proportionate share of jointly owned facilities is recorded as property, plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets, and PSCo’s proportionate share of the operating costs associated with these facilities is included in its consolidated statements of income.  See Note 6 for further discussion of jointly owned generation, transmission, and gas facilities and related ownership percentages.

PSCo evaluates its arrangements and contracts with other entities, including but not limited to, investments, PPAs and fuel contracts to determine if the other party is a variable interest entity, if PSCo has a variable interest and if PSCo is the primary beneficiary.  PSCo follows accounting guidance for variable interest entities which requires consideration of the activities that most significantly impact an entity’s financial performance and power to direct those activities, when determining whether PSCo is a variable interest entity’s primary beneficiary.  See Note 12 for further discussion of variable interest entities.

Use of Estimates — In recording transactions and balances resulting from business operations, PSCo uses estimates based on the best information available.  Estimates are used for such items as plant depreciable lives or potential disallowances, AROs, certain regulatory assets and liabilities, tax provisions, uncollectible amounts, environmental costs, unbilled revenues, jurisdictional fuel and energy cost allocations and actuarially determined benefit costs.  The recorded estimates are revised when better information becomes available or when actual amounts can be determined.  Those revisions can affect operating results.

Regulatory Accounting — PSCo accounts for certain income and expense items in accordance with accounting guidance for regulated operations. Under this guidance:

Certain costs, which would otherwise be charged to expense or OCI, are deferred as regulatory assets based on the expected ability to recover the costs in future rates; and
Certain credits, which would otherwise be reflected as income, are deferred as regulatory liabilities based on the expectation the amounts will be returned to customers in future rates, or because the amounts were collected in rates prior to the costs being incurred.

Estimates of recovering deferred costs and returning deferred credits are based on specific ratemaking decisions or precedent for each item. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the treatment in the rate setting process.

If restructuring or other changes in the regulatory environment occur, PSCo may no longer be eligible to apply this accounting treatment and may be required to eliminate regulatory assets and liabilities from its balance sheet.  Such changes could have a material effect on PSCo’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.  See Note 13 for further discussion of regulatory assets and liabilities.

Revenue Recognition — Revenues related to the sale of energy are generally recorded when service is rendered or energy is delivered to customers. However, the determination of the energy sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meter, which occurs on a systematic basis throughout the month.  At the end of each month, amounts of energy delivered to customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recognized.  PSCo presents its revenue net of any excise or other fiduciary-type taxes or fees.


40


PSCo has various rate-adjustment mechanisms in place that provide for the recovery of natural gas, electric fuel and purchased energy costs. These cost-adjustment tariffs may increase or decrease the level of revenue collected from customers and are revised periodically for differences between the total amount collected under the clauses and the costs incurred.  When applicable, under governing regulatory commission rate orders, fuel cost over-recoveries (the excess of fuel revenue billed to customers over fuel costs incurred) are deferred as regulatory liabilities and under-recoveries (the excess of fuel costs incurred over fuel revenues billed to customers) are deferred as regulatory assets.

Conservation Programs — PSCo has implemented programs to assist its retail customers in conserving energy and reducing peak demand on the electric and natural gas systems.  These programs include approximately sixteen unique DSM products for commercial and industrial customers, as well as approximately one dozen DSM products for residential customers. Each DSM product may include one or up to several hundred measures that qualify for rebates and/or incentives.

The costs incurred for DSM programs are deferred if it is probable future revenue will be provided to permit recovery of the incurred cost. Recorded revenues for incentive programs designed for recovery of lost margins and/or conservation performance incentives are limited to amounts expected to be collected within 24 months from the annual period in which they are earned.

PSCo’s DSM program costs are recovered through a combination of base rate revenue and rider mechanisms.  The revenue billed to customers recovers incurred costs for conservation programs and also incentive amounts that are designed to encourage PSCo’s achievement of energy conservation goals.  PSCo recognizes regulatory assets to reflect the amount of costs or earned incentives that have not yet been collected from customers.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Depreciation — Property, plant and equipment is stated at original cost.  The cost of plant includes direct labor and materials, contracted work, overhead costs and AFUDC.  The cost of plant retired is charged to accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Amounts recovered in rates for future removal costs are recorded as regulatory liabilities.  Significant additions or improvements extending asset lives are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. Maintenance and replacement of items determined to be less than a unit of property are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Planned major maintenance activities are charged to operating expense unless the cost represents the acquisition of an additional unit of property or the replacement of an existing unit of property.  Property, plant and equipment also includes costs associated with property held for future use. The depreciable lives of certain plant assets are reviewed annually, and revised, if appropriate. Property, plant and equipment that is required to be decommissioned early by a regulator is reclassified as plant to be retired.

Property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment when it is determined that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. A loss is recognized in the current period if it becomes probable that part of a cost of a plant under construction or recently completed plant will be disallowed for recovery from customers and a reasonable estimate of the disallowance can be made. For investments in property, plant and equipment that are abandoned and not expected to go into service, incurred costs and related deferred tax amounts are compared to the discounted estimated future rate recovery, and a loss is recognized, if necessary.

PSCo records depreciation expense related to its plant using the straight-line method over the plant’s useful life.  Actuarial life studies are performed and submitted to the state and federal commissions for review.  Upon acceptance by the various commissions, the resulting lives and net salvage rates are used to calculate depreciation.  Depreciation expense, expressed as a percentage of average depreciable property, was approximately 2.7, 2.8 and 2.6 percent for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Leases — PSCo evaluates a variety of contracts for lease classification at inception, including PPAs and rental arrangements for office space, vehicles, and equipment.  Contracts determined to contain a lease because of per unit pricing that is other than fixed or market price, terms regarding the use of a particular asset, and other factors are evaluated further to determine if the arrangement is a capital lease. See Note 12 for further discussion of leases.

AFUDC — AFUDC represents the cost of capital used to finance utility construction activity.  AFUDC is computed by applying a composite financing rate to qualified CWIP.  The amount of AFUDC capitalized as a utility construction cost is credited to other nonoperating income (for equity capital) and interest charges (for debt capital).  AFUDC amounts capitalized are included in PSCo’s rate base for establishing utility service rates.


41


Generally, AFUDC costs are recovered from customers as the related property is depreciated.  However, in some cases, including certain generation and transmission projects, the CPUC has approved a more current recovery of the cost of capital associated with large capital projects, resulting in a lower recognition of AFUDC.  In other cases, the CPUC has allowed an AFUDC calculation greater than the FERC-defined AFUDC rate, resulting in higher recognition of AFUDC.

AROs — PSCo accounts for AROs under accounting guidance that requires a liability for the fair value of an ARO to be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if it can be reasonably estimated, with the offsetting associated asset retirement costs capitalized as a long-lived asset. The liability is generally increased over time by applying the effective interest method of accretion, and the capitalized costs are depreciated over the useful life of the long-lived asset. Changes resulting from revisions to the timing or amount of expected asset retirement cash flows are recognized as an increase or a decrease in the ARO. PSCo also recovers through rates certain future plant removal costs in addition to AROs. The accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as a regulatory liability. See Note 12 for further discussion of AROs.

Income Taxes — PSCo accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements.  PSCo defers income taxes for all temporary differences between pretax financial and taxable income, and between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities.  PSCo uses the tax rates that are scheduled to be in effect when the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  In making such a determination, all available evidence is considered, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations.

Investment tax credits are deferred and their benefits amortized over the book depreciable lives of the related property.  Utility rate regulation also has resulted in the recognition of certain regulatory assets and liabilities related to income taxes, which are summarized in Note 13.

PSCo follows the applicable accounting guidance to measure and disclose uncertain tax positions that it has taken or expects to take in its income tax returns.  PSCo recognizes a tax position in its consolidated financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position.  Recognition of changes in uncertain tax positions are reflected as a component of income tax.

PSCo reports interest and penalties related to income taxes within the other income and interest charges sections in the consolidated statements of income.

Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries, including PSCo, file consolidated federal income tax returns as well as combined or separate state income tax returns.  Federal income taxes paid by Xcel Energy Inc. are allocated to Xcel Energy Inc.’s subsidiaries based on separate company computations of tax.  A similar allocation is made for state income taxes paid by Xcel Energy Inc. in connection with combined state filings.  Xcel Energy Inc. also allocates its own income tax benefits to its direct subsidiaries which are recorded directly in equity by the subsidiaries based on the relative positive tax liabilities of the subsidiaries.

See Note 7 for further discussion of income taxes.

Types of and Accounting for Derivative Instruments PSCo uses derivative instruments in connection with its interest rate, utility commodity price, vehicle fuel price, and commodity trading activities, including forward contracts, futures, swaps and options.  All derivative instruments not designated and qualifying for the normal purchases and normal sales exception, as defined by the accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging, are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value as derivative instruments.  This includes certain instruments used to mitigate market risk for the utility operations and all instruments related to the commodity trading operations.  The classification of changes in fair value for those derivative instruments is dependent on the designation of a qualifying hedging relationship.  Changes in fair value of derivative instruments not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship are reflected in current earnings or as a regulatory asset or liability.  The classification as a regulatory asset or liability is based on commission approved regulatory recovery mechanisms.


42


Gains or losses on commodity trading transactions are recorded as a component of electric operating revenues; hedging transactions for vehicle fuel costs are recorded as a component of capital projects or O&M costs; and interest rate hedging transactions are recorded as a component of interest expense.  PSCo is allowed to recover in electric or natural gas rates the costs of certain financial instruments purchased to reduce commodity cost volatility.  For further information on derivatives entered to mitigate commodity price risk on behalf of electric and natural gas customer, see Note 10.

Cash Flow Hedges — Certain qualifying hedging relationships are designated as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or future cash flow (cash flow hedge).  Changes in the fair value of a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, to the extent effective are included in OCI, or deferred as a regulatory asset or liability based on recovery mechanisms until earnings are affected by the hedged transaction.

Normal Purchases and Normal Sales — PSCo enters into contracts for the purchase and sale of commodities for use in its business operations. Derivatives and hedging accounting guidance requires a company to evaluate these contracts to determine whether the contracts are derivatives.  Certain contracts that meet the definition of a derivative may be exempted from derivative accounting if designated as normal purchases or normal sales.

PSCo evaluates all of its contracts at inception to determine if they are derivatives and if they meet the normal purchases and normal sales designation requirements.  None of the contracts entered into within the commodity trading operations qualify for a normal purchases and normal sales designation.

See Note 10 for further discussion of PSCo’s risk management and derivative activities.

Commodity Trading Operations — All applicable gains and losses related to commodity trading activities, whether or not settled physically, are shown on a net basis in electric operating revenues in the consolidated statements of income.

Pursuant to the JOA approved by the FERC, some of the commodity trading margins from PSCo are apportioned to NSP-Minnesota and SPS. Commodity trading activities are not associated with energy produced from PSCo’s generation assets or energy and capacity purchased to serve native load.  Commodity trading contracts are recorded at fair market value and commodity trading results include the impact of all margin-sharing mechanisms.  See Note 10 for further discussion.

Fair Value Measurements PSCo presents cash equivalents, interest rate derivatives and commodity derivatives at estimated fair values in its consolidated financial statements.  Cash equivalents are recorded at cost plus accrued interest; money market funds are measured using quoted net asset values.  For interest rate derivatives, quoted prices based primarily on observable market interest rate curves are used as a primary input to establish fair value.  For commodity derivatives, the most observable inputs available are generally used to determine the fair value of each contract.  In the absence of a quoted price for an identical contract in an active market, PSCo may use quoted prices for similar contracts, or internally prepared valuation models to determine fair value.  See Note 10 for further discussion.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — PSCo considers investments in certain instruments, including commercial paper and money market funds, with a remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase, to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Bad Debts Accounts receivable are stated at the actual billed amount net of an allowance for bad debts. PSCo establishes an allowance for uncollectible receivables based on a policy that reflects its expected exposure to the credit risk of customers.

Inventory — All inventory is recorded at average cost.

RECs — RECs are marketable environmental instruments that represent proof that energy was generated from eligible renewable energy sources.  RECs are awarded upon delivery of the associated energy and can be bought and sold.  RECs are typically used as a form of measurement of compliance to RPS enacted by those states that are encouraging construction and consumption from renewable energy sources, but can also be sold separately from the energy produced.  PSCo acquires RECs from the generation or purchase of renewable power.

When RECs are purchased or acquired in the course of generation they are recorded as inventory at cost.  The cost of RECs that are utilized for compliance purposes is recorded as electric fuel and purchased power expense.  As a result of state regulatory orders, PSCo records that cost as a regulatory asset when the amount is recoverable in future rates.


43


Sales of RECs that are purchased or acquired in the course of generation are recorded in electric utility operating revenues on a gross basis. The cost of these RECs, related transaction costs, and amounts credited to customers under margin-sharing mechanisms are recorded in electric fuel and purchased power expense.  The sales of RECs for trading purposes are recorded in electric utility operating revenues, net of the cost of the RECs, transaction costs, and amounts credited to customers under margin-sharing mechanisms.

Emission Allowances — Emission allowances, including the annual SO2 and NOx emission allowance entitlement received from the EPA, are recorded at cost plus associated broker commission fees.  PSCo follows the inventory accounting model for all emission allowances.  Sales of emission allowances are included in electric utility operating revenues and the operating activities section of the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Environmental Costs — Environmental costs are recorded when it is probable PSCo is liable for remediation costs and the liability can be reasonably estimated.  Costs are deferred as a regulatory asset if it is probable that the costs will be recovered from customers in future rates. Otherwise, the costs are expensed.  If an environmental expense is related to facilities currently in use, such as emission-control equipment, the cost is capitalized and depreciated over the life of the plant.

Estimated remediation costs, excluding inflationary increases, are recorded.  The estimates are based on experience, an assessment of the current situation and the technology currently available for use in the remediation.  The recorded costs are regularly adjusted as estimates are revised and remediation proceeds.  If other participating PRPs exist and acknowledge their potential involvement with a site, costs are estimated and recorded only for PSCo’s expected share of the cost.  Any future costs of restoring sites where operation may extend indefinitely are treated as a capitalized cost of plant retirement.  The depreciation expense levels recoverable in rates include a provision for removal expenses, which may include final remediation costs.  Removal costs recovered in rates before the related costs are incurred are classified as a regulatory liability.

See Note 12 for further discussion of environmental costs.

Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits — PSCo maintains pension and postretirement benefit plans for eligible employees. Recognizing the cost of providing benefits and measuring the projected benefit obligation of these plans under applicable accounting guidance requires management to make various assumptions and estimates.

Based on regulatory recovery mechanisms, certain unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service costs or credits are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities, rather than OCI.

See Note 8 for further discussion of benefit plans and other postretirement benefits.

Guarantees — PSCo recognizes, upon issuance or modification of a guarantee, a liability for the fair market value of the obligation that has been assumed in issuing the guarantee.  This liability includes consideration of specific triggering events and other conditions which may modify the ongoing obligation to perform under the guarantee.

The obligation recognized is reduced over the term of the guarantee as PSCo is released from risk under the guarantee.

Subsequent Events — Management has evaluated the impact of events occurring after Dec. 31, 2014 up to the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements.  These statements contain all necessary adjustments and disclosures resulting from that evaluation.

2.
Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued

Revenue Recognition — In May 2014, the FASB issued Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Topic 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), which provides a framework for the recognition of revenue, with the objective that recognized revenues properly reflect amounts an entity is entitled to receive in exchange for goods and services. This guidance, which includes additional disclosure requirements regarding revenue, cash flows and obligations related to contracts with customers, will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2016. PSCo is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements.

44


3.
Selected Balance Sheet Data
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Accounts receivable, net
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
 
$
346,007

 
$
351,180

Less allowance for bad debts
 
(23,122
)
 
(22,505
)
 
 
$
322,885

 
$
328,675

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Inventories
 
 
 
 
Materials and supplies
 
$
55,491

 
$
53,127

Fuel
 
80,963

 
86,062

Natural gas
 
102,525

 
98,818

 
 
$
238,979

 
$
238,007

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Property, plant and equipment, net
 
 
 
 
Electric plant
 
$
10,927,867

 
$
10,177,056

Natural gas plant
 
3,210,242

 
2,757,605

Common and other property
 
827,708

 
762,916

Plant to be retired (a)
 
71,534

 
101,279

Construction work in progress
 
828,620

 
952,469

Total property, plant and equipment
 
15,865,971

 
14,751,325

Less accumulated depreciation
 
(4,239,015
)
 
(4,008,928
)
 
 
$
11,626,956

 
$
10,742,397


(a) 
As a result of the CPUC’s 2010 approval of PSCo’s CACJA compliance plan and the December 2013 approval of PSCo’s preferred plans for applicable generating resources, PSCo has received approval for early retirement of Cherokee Unit 3 and Valmont Unit 5 between 2015 and 2017. Amounts are presented net of accumulated depreciation.

4.
Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments

Short-Term Borrowings

Money Pool — Xcel Energy Inc. and its utility subsidiaries have established a money pool arrangement that allows for short-term investments in and borrowings between the utility subsidiaries. Xcel Energy Inc. may make investments in the utility subsidiaries at market-based interest rates; however, the money pool arrangement does not allow the utility subsidiaries to make investments in Xcel Energy Inc. Money pool borrowings for PSCo were as follows:
(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
 
Three Months Ended Dec. 31, 2014
Borrowing limit
 
$
250

Amount outstanding at period end
 

Average amount outstanding
 
1

Maximum amount outstanding
 
21

Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
 
0.28
%
Weighted average interest rate at period end
 
N/A


45


(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
 
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31, 2014
 
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31, 2013
 
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31, 2012
Borrowing limit
 
$
250

 
$
250

 
$
250

Amount outstanding at period end
 

 

 

Average amount outstanding
 
4.2

 
0.1

 
0.3

Maximum amount outstanding
 
97

 
12

 
8

Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
 
0.25
%
 
0.36
%
 
0.33
%
Weighted average interest rate at period end
 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A


Commercial Paper — PSCo meets its short-term liquidity requirements primarily through the issuance of commercial paper and borrowings under its credit facility. Commercial paper borrowings for PSCo were as follows:
(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
 
Three Months Ended Dec. 31, 2014
Borrowing limit
 
$
700

Amount outstanding at period end
 
382

Average amount outstanding
 
292

Maximum amount outstanding
 
393

Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
 
0.37
%
Weighted average interest rate at period end
 
0.65

(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
 
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31, 2014
 
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31, 2013
 
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31, 2012
Borrowing limit
 
$
700

 
$
700

 
$
700

Amount outstanding at period end
 
382

 

 
154

Average amount outstanding
 
167

 
38

 
8

Maximum amount outstanding
 
393

 
332

 
165

Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
 
0.31
%
 
0.34
%
 
0.33
%
Weighted average interest rate at period end
 
0.65

 
N/A

 
0.35


Letters of Credit PSCo uses letters of credit, generally with terms of one-year, to provide financial guarantees for certain operating obligations. At both Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, there was $6.4 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility. The contract amounts of these letters of credit approximate their fair value and are subject to fees.

Credit Facility — In order to use its commercial paper program to fulfill short-term funding needs, PSCo must have a revolving credit facility in place at least equal to the amount of its commercial paper borrowing limit and cannot issue commercial paper in an aggregate amount exceeding available capacity under this credit facility. The credit facility provides short-term financing in the form of notes payable to banks, letters of credit and back-up support for commercial paper borrowings.

Amended Credit Agreement — In October 2014, PSCo entered into an amended five-year credit agreement with a syndicate of banks. The amended credit agreement has substantially the same terms and conditions as the prior credit agreement with an extension of maturity from July 2017 to October 2019. The borrowing limit for PSCo remained at $700 million.

PSCo has the right to request an extension of the revolving termination date for two additional one-year periods. All extension requests are subject to majority bank group approval.

Other features of PSCo’s credit facility include:

PSCo may increase its credit facility by up to $100 million.
The credit facility has a financial covenant requiring that the debt-to-total capitalization ratio be less than or equal to 65 percent. PSCo was in compliance as its debt-to-total capitalization ratio was 47 percent and 45 percent at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. If PSCo does not comply with the covenant, an event of default may be declared, and if not remedied, any outstanding amounts due under the facility can be declared due by the lender.
The credit facility has a cross-default provision that provides PSCo will be in default on its borrowings under the facility if PSCo or any of its subsidiaries whose total assets exceed 15 percent of PSCo’s consolidated total assets, default on certain indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount exceeding $75 million.

46


The interest rates under the line of credit are based on Eurodollar borrowing margins ranging from 87.5 to 175 basis points per year based on the applicable long-term credit ratings.
The commitment fees, also based on applicable long-term credit ratings, are calculated on the unused portion of the lines of credit at a range of 7.5 to 27.5 basis points per year.

At Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo had the following committed credit facility available (in millions):
Credit Facility (a)
 
Drawn (b)
 
Available
$
700.0

 
$
388.4

 
$
311.6


(a) 
These credit facilities have been amended to extend the maturity to October 2019.
(b) 
Includes outstanding commercial paper and letters of credit.

All credit facility bank borrowings, outstanding letters of credit and outstanding commercial paper reduce the available capacity under the credit facility. PSCo had no direct advances on the credit facility outstanding at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013.

Long-Term Borrowings

Generally, all real and personal property of PSCo is subject to the liens of its first mortgage indenture. Debt premiums, discounts and expenses are amortized over the life of the related debt. The premiums, discounts and expenses associated with refinanced debt are deferred and amortized over the life of the related new issuance, in accordance with regulatory guidelines.

In March 2014, PSCo issued $300 million of 4.30 percent first mortgage bonds due March 15, 2044. In March 2013, PSCo issued $250 million of 2.50 percent first mortgage bonds due March 15, 2023, and $250 million of 3.95 percent first mortgage bonds due March 15, 2043.

During the next five years, PSCo has long-term debt maturities of $130 million, $300 million and $400 million due in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Deferred Financing Costs — Other assets included deferred financing costs of approximately $26.5 million and $37.0 million, net of amortization, at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.  PSCo is amortizing these financing costs over the remaining maturity periods of the related debt.

Dividend Restrictions PSCo’s dividends are subject to the FERC’s jurisdiction under the Federal Power Act, which prohibits the payment of dividends out of capital accounts; payment of dividends is allowed out of retained earnings only.

5.
Preferred Stock

PSCo has authorized the issuance of preferred stock.
Preferred
Shares
Authorized
 
Par Value
 
Preferred
Shares
Outstanding
10,000,000

 
$
0.01

 
None



47


6.
Joint Ownership of Generation, Transmission and Gas Facilities

Following are the investments by PSCo in jointly owned generation, transmission and gas facilities and the related ownership percentages as of Dec. 31, 2014:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Plant in
Service
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
CWIP
 
Ownership %
Electric Generation:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hayden Unit 1
 
$
98,145

 
$
66,333

 
$
1,405

 
75.5
%
Hayden Unit 2
 
121,571

 
59,999

 
8,867

 
37.4

Hayden Common Facilities
 
37,049

 
16,928

 
135

 
53.1

Craig Units 1 and 2
 
59,860

 
35,573

 
3,013

 
9.7

Craig Common Facilities 1, 2 and 3
 
36,890

 
17,735

 
527

 
6.5

Comanche Unit 3
 
883,971

 
81,748

 
64

 
66.7

Comanche Common Facilities
 
23,624

 
1,051

 
308

 
82.0

Electric Transmission:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transmission and other facilities, including substations
 
151,301

 
60,847

 
1,730

 
Various

Gas Transportation:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rifle, Colo. to Avon, Colo.
 
16,278

 
5,594

 

 
60.0

Total
 
$
1,428,689

 
$
345,808

 
$
16,049

 
 

PSCo has approximately 820 MW of jointly owned generating capacity.  PSCo’s share of operating expenses and construction expenditures are included in the applicable utility accounts.  Each of the respective owners is responsible for providing its own financing.

7.
Income Taxes

Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 In 2014, the Tax Increase Prevention Act (TIPA) was signed into law. The TIPA provides for the following:
The R&E credit was extended for 2014;
PTCs were extended for projects that began construction before the end of 2014 with certain projects qualifying into future years; and
50 percent bonus depreciation was extended one year through 2014. Additionally, some longer production period property placed in service in 2015 is also eligible for 50 percent bonus depreciation.

The accounting related to the TIPA was recorded beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014 because a change in tax law is accounted for in the period of enactment.

American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 In 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act (ATRA) was signed into law. The ATRA provided for the following:

The top tax rate for dividends increased from 15 percent to 20 percent. The 20 percent dividend rate is now consistent with the tax rates for capital gains;
The R&E credit was extended for 2012 and 2013;

48


PTCs were extended for projects that began construction before the end of 2013 with certain projects qualifying into future years; and
50 percent bonus depreciation was extended one year through 2013. Additionally, some longer production period property placed in service in 2014 is also eligible for 50 percent bonus depreciation.

The accounting related to the ATRA, including the provisions related to 2012, was recorded beginning in the first quarter of 2013 because a change in tax law is accounted for in the period of enactment.

Prescription drug tax benefit In the third quarter of 2012, PSCo implemented a tax strategy related to the allocation of funding of PSCo’s retiree prescription drug plan.  This strategy restored a portion of the tax benefit associated with federal subsidies for prescription drug plans that had been accrued since 2004 and was expensed in 2010.  As a result, PSCo recognized approximately $17 million of income tax benefit.

Medicare Part D In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law.  The law includes provisions to generate tax revenue to help offset the cost of the new legislation.  One of these provisions reduces the deductibility of retiree health care costs to the extent of federal subsidies received by plan sponsors that provide retiree prescription drug benefits equivalent to Medicare Part D coverage, beginning in 2013.

Federal Audit  PSCo is a member of the Xcel Energy affiliated group that files a consolidated federal income tax return.  The statute of limitations applicable to Xcel Energy’s 2008 federal income tax return expired in September 2012.  The statute of limitations applicable to Xcel Energy’s 2009 federal income tax return expires in March 2016. In the third quarter of 2012, the IRS commenced an examination of tax years 2010 and 2011, including the 2009 carryback claim. As of Dec. 31, 2014, the IRS had proposed an adjustment to the federal tax loss carryback claims that would result in $12 million of income tax expense for the 2009 through 2011 claims, the recently filed 2013 claim, and the anticipated claim for 2014. PSCo is not expected to accrue any income tax expense related to this adjustment. At Dec. 31, 2014, the IRS has begun the Appeals process; however, the outcome and timing of a resolution is uncertain.

State Audits — PSCo is a member of the Xcel Energy affiliated group that files consolidated state income tax returns. As of Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo’s earliest open tax year that is subject to examination by state taxing authorities under applicable statutes of limitations is 2009. There are currently no state income tax audits in progress.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits The unrecognized tax benefit balance includes permanent tax positions, which if recognized would affect the annual ETR. In addition, the unrecognized tax benefit balance includes temporary tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility.  A change in the period of deductibility would not affect the ETR but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.

A reconciliation of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Unrecognized tax benefit — Permanent tax positions
 
$
1.9

 
$
2.5

Unrecognized tax benefit — Temporary tax positions
 
10.0

 
5.9

Total unrecognized tax benefit
 
$
11.9

 
$
8.4


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefit is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Balance at Jan. 1
 
$
8.4

 
$
9.6

 
$
11.4

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
 
3.7

 
3.9

 
1.9

Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year
 
(0.7
)
 

 
(1.5
)
Additions for tax positions of prior years
 
2.8

 
3.3

 
2.0

Reductions for tax positions of prior years
 
(1.2
)
 
(0.9
)
 
(4.2
)
Settlements with taxing authorities
 
(1.1
)
 
(7.5
)
 

Balance at Dec. 31
 
$
11.9

 
$
8.4

 
$
9.6



49


The unrecognized tax benefit amounts were reduced by the tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards.  The amounts of tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
NOL and tax credit carryforwards
 
$
(3.9
)
 
$
(7.0
)

It is reasonably possible that PSCo’s amount of unrecognized tax benefits could significantly change in the next 12 months as the IRS Appeals process progresses and state audits resume. As the IRS Appeals process moves closer to completion, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit could decrease up to approximately $1 million.

The payable for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits is partially offset by the interest benefit associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards. The payables for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were not material. No amounts were accrued for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as of Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 or 2012.

Other Income Tax Matters — NOL amounts represent the amount of the tax loss that is carried forward and tax credits represent the deferred tax asset. NOL and tax credit carryforwards as of Dec. 31 were as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Federal NOL carryforward
 
$
319.5

 
$
315.5

Federal tax credit carryforwards
 
22.3

 
19.4

State NOL carryforwards
 
690.1

 
664.6

State tax credit carryforwards, net of federal detriment
 
12.2

 
11.2


The federal carryforward periods expire between 2021 and 2034.  The state carryforward periods expire between 2017 and 2033.

Total income tax expense from operations differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income tax expense.  The following reconciles such differences for the years ending Dec. 31:
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Federal statutory rate
 
35.0
 %
 
35.0
 %
 
35.0
 %
Increases (decreases) in tax from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
 
2.8

 
3.0

 
2.3

Change in unrecognized tax benefits
 
(0.1
)
 
0.1

 
0.1

Regulatory differences — utility plant items
 
(2.1
)
 
(1.4
)
 
(0.6
)
Tax credits recognized, net of federal income tax expense
 
(0.8
)
 
(0.8
)
 
(0.6
)
Prescription drug tax benefit and Medicare Part D
 

 

 
(2.5
)
Other, net
 
0.1

 
(0.3
)
 

Effective income tax rate
 
34.9
 %
 
35.6
 %
 
33.7
 %

The components of income tax expense for the years ending Dec. 31 were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Current federal tax (benefit) expense
 
$
9,550

 
$
(52,408
)
 
$
176,354

Current state tax (benefit) expense
 
2,611

 
(7,252
)
 
24,502

Current change in unrecognized tax (benefit) expense
 
6,548

 
(2,918
)
 
(3,447
)
Deferred federal tax expense
 
208,781

 
273,916

 
38,309

Deferred state tax expense (benefit)
 
26,196

 
38,243

 
(4,424
)
Deferred change in unrecognized tax expense (benefit)
 
(7,154
)
 
4,094

 
4,207

Deferred investment tax credits
 
(2,941
)
 
(2,935
)
 
(2,957
)
Total income tax expense
 
$
243,591

 
$
250,740

 
$
232,544



50


The components of deferred income tax expense for the years ending Dec. 31 were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Deferred tax expense excluding items below
 
$
254,142

 
$
335,580

 
$
41,233

Amortization and adjustments to deferred income taxes on income tax regulatory assets and liabilities
 
(26,649
)
 
(19,616
)
 
(9,574
)
Tax benefit allocated to other comprehensive income and other
 
330

 
289

 
6,433

Deferred tax expense
 
$
227,823

 
$
316,253

 
$
38,092


The components of the net deferred tax liability (current and noncurrent) at Dec. 31 were as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Deferred tax liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Differences between book and tax bases of property
 
$
2,467,260

 
$
2,197,685

Employee benefits
 
110,556

 
100,003

Other
 
140,080

 
132,436

Total deferred tax liabilities
 
$
2,717,896

 
$
2,430,124

Deferred tax assets:
 
 
 
 
NOL carryforward
 
$
143,158

 
$
137,043

Unbilled revenue - fuel costs
 
57,654

 
49,171

Rate refund
 
43,735

 
26,943

Tax credit carryforward
 
34,493

 
30,643

Regulatory liabilities
 
14,549

 
14,893

Deferred investment tax credits
 
13,781

 
14,905

Other
 
37,472

 
37,614

Total deferred tax assets
 
$
344,842

 
$
311,212

Net deferred tax liability
 
$
2,373,054

 
$
2,118,912


8.
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

Consistent with the process for rate recovery of pension and postretirement benefits for its employees, PSCo accounts for its participation in, and related costs of, pension and other postretirement benefit plans sponsored by Xcel Energy Inc. as multiple employer plans. PSCo is responsible for its share of cash contributions, plan costs and obligations and is entitled to its share of plan assets; accordingly, PSCo accounts for its pro rata share of these plans, including pension expense and contributions, resulting in accounting consistent with that of a single employer plan exclusively for PSCo employees.

Xcel Energy, which includes PSCo, offers various benefit plans to its employees. Approximately 77 percent of employees that receive benefits are represented by several local labor unions under several collective-bargaining agreements. At Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo had 2,063 bargaining employees covered under a collective-bargaining agreement, which expired in May 2014. While collective bargaining is ongoing, the terms and conditions of the expired agreement are automatically extended until the parties reach an agreement or a decision is rendered by an arbitrator.

The plans invest in various instruments which are disclosed under the accounting guidance for fair value measurements which establishes a hierarchical framework for disclosing the observability of the inputs utilized in measuring fair value. The three levels in the hierarchy and examples of each level are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices.

Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, or priced with models using highly observable inputs.


51


Level 3 — Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation.

Specific valuation methods include the following:

Cash equivalents The fair values of cash equivalents are generally based on cost plus accrued interest; money market funds are measured using quoted net asset values.

Insurance contracts — Insurance contract fair values take into consideration the value of the investments in separate accounts of the insurer, which are priced based on observable inputs.

Investments in equity securities and other funds — Equity securities are valued using quoted prices in active markets. The fair values for commingled funds, private equity investments and real estate investments are measured using net asset values, which take into consideration the value of underlying fund investments, as well as the other accrued assets and liabilities of a fund, in order to determine a per share market value. The investments in commingled funds may be redeemed for net asset value with proper notice. Proper notice varies by fund and can range from daily with one or two days notice to annually with 90 days notice. Private equity investments require approval of the fund for any unscheduled redemption, and such redemptions may be approved or denied by the fund at its sole discretion. Unscheduled distributions from real estate investments may be redeemed with proper notice, which is typically quarterly with 45-90 days notice; however, withdrawals from real estate investments may be delayed or discounted as a result of fund illiquidity. Based on the plan’s evaluation of its ability to redeem private equity and real estate investments, fair value measurements for private equity and real estate investments have been assigned a Level 3.

Investments in debt securities — Fair values for debt securities are determined by a third party pricing service using recent trades and observable spreads from benchmark interest rates for similar securities.

Derivative Instruments Fair values for foreign currency derivatives are determined using pricing models based on the prevailing forward exchange rate of the underlying currencies. The fair values of interest rate derivatives are based on broker quotes that utilize current market interest rate forecasts.

Pension Benefits

Xcel Energy, which includes PSCo, has several noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans that cover almost all employees. Generally, benefits are based on a combination of years of service, the employee’s average pay and, in some cases, social security benefits. Xcel Energy Inc.’s and PSCo’s policy is to fully fund into an external trust the actuarially determined pension costs recognized for ratemaking and financial reporting purposes, subject to the limitations of applicable employee benefit and tax laws.

In addition to the qualified pension plans, Xcel Energy maintains a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) and a nonqualified pension plan. The SERP is maintained for certain executives that were participants in the plan in 2008, when the SERP was closed to new participants. The nonqualified pension plan provides unfunded, nonqualified benefits for compensation that is in excess of the limits applicable to the qualified pension plans. The total obligations of the SERP and nonqualified plan as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were $46.5 million and $36.5 million, respectively, of which $3.8 million and $3.5 million were attributable to PSCo. In 2014 and 2013, Xcel Energy recognized net benefit cost for financial reporting for the SERP and nonqualified plans of $4.7 million and $6.6 million, respectively, of which $0.6 million in each year was attributable to PSCo. Benefits for these unfunded plans are paid out of Xcel Energy’s consolidated operating cash flows.

Xcel Energy Inc. and PSCo base the investment-return assumption on expected long-term performance for each of the investment types included in the pension asset portfolio and consider the historical returns achieved by the asset portfolio over the past 20-year or longer period, as well as the long-term return levels projected and recommended by investment experts. Xcel Energy Inc. and PSCo continually review the pension assumptions. The pension cost determination assumes a forecasted mix of investment types over the long term.

Investment returns in 2014 were above the assumed levels of 6.81 percent;
Investment returns in 2013 were below the assumed level of 6.47 percent;
Investment returns in 2012 were above the assumed level of 6.65 percent; and
In 2015, PSCo’s expected investment-return assumption is 6.81 percent.


52


The assets are invested in a portfolio according to Xcel Energy Inc.’s and PSCo’s return, liquidity and diversification objectives to provide a source of funding for plan obligations and minimize the necessity of contributions to the plan, within appropriate levels of risk. The principal mechanism for achieving these objectives is the projected allocation of assets to selected asset classes, given the long-term risk, return, and liquidity characteristics of each particular asset class. There were no significant concentrations of risk in any particular industry, index, or entity. Market volatility can impact even well-diversified portfolios and significantly affect the return levels achieved by pension assets in any year.

The following table presents the target pension asset allocations for PSCo at Dec. 31 for the upcoming year:
 
 
2014
 
2013
Domestic and international equity securities
 
32
%
 
29
%
Long-duration fixed income and interest rate swap securities
 
35

 
36

Short-to-intermediate term fixed income securities
 
12

 
14

Alternative investments
 
18

 
19

Cash
 
3

 
2

Total
 
100
%
 
100
%

The ongoing investment strategy is based on plan-specific investment recommendations that seek to minimize potential investment and interest rate risk as a plan’s funded status increases over time. The investment recommendations result in a greater percentage of long-duration fixed income securities being allocated to specific plans having relatively higher funded status ratios and a greater percentage of growth assets being allocated to plans having relatively lower funded status ratios. The aggregate projected asset allocation presented in the table above for the master pension trust results from the plan-specific strategies.

Pension Plan Assets

The following tables present, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, PSCo’s pension plan assets that are measured at fair value as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2014
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
82,486

 
$

 
$

 
$
82,486

Derivatives
 

 
508

 

 
508

Government securities
 

 
180,912

 

 
180,912

Corporate bonds
 

 
115,593

 

 
115,593

Asset-backed securities
 

 
1,360

 

 
1,360

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
3,997

 

 
3,997

Common stock
 
37,067

 

 

 
37,067

Private equity investments
 

 

 
50,210

 
50,210

Commingled funds
 

 
629,439

 

 
629,439

Real estate
 

 

 
18,410

 
18,410

Securities lending collateral obligation and other
 

 
(16,117
)
 

 
(16,117
)
Total
 
$
119,553

 
$
915,692

 
$
68,620

 
$
1,103,865


53


 
 
Dec. 31, 2013
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
42,721

 
$

 
$

 
$
42,721

Derivatives
 

 
14,755

 

 
14,755

Government securities
 

 
125,891

 

 
125,891

Corporate bonds
 

 
183,078

 

 
183,078

Asset-backed securities
 

 
2,356

 

 
2,356

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
5,267

 

 
5,267

Common stock
 
34,742

 

 

 
34,742

Private equity investments
 

 

 
49,022

 
49,022

Commingled funds
 

 
582,722

 

 
582,722

Real estate
 

 

 
15,556

 
15,556

Securities lending collateral obligation and other
 

 
10,947

 

 
10,947

Total
 
$
77,463

 
$
925,016

 
$
64,578

 
$
1,067,057


The following tables present the changes in PSCo’s Level 3 pension plan assets for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2014
 
Net Realized Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances and Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3
 
Dec. 31, 2014
Private equity investments
 
$
49,022

 
$
8,495

 
$
(4,299
)
 
$
(3,008
)
 
$

 
$
50,210

Real estate
 
15,556

 
1,180

 
(302
)
 
1,976

 

 
18,410

Total
 
$
64,578

 
$
9,675

 
$
(4,601
)
 
$
(1,032
)
 
$

 
$
68,620

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2013
 
Net Realized Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances and Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3 (a)
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Asset-backed securities
 
$
4,604

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(4,604
)
 
$

Mortgage-backed securities
 
12,058

 

 

 

 
(12,058
)
 

Private equity investments
 
47,056

 
7,074

 
(4,027
)
 
(1,081
)
 

 
49,022

Real estate
 
19,273

 
(870
)
 
3,769

 
3,048

 
(9,664
)
 
15,556

Total
 
$
82,991

 
$
6,204

 
$
(258
)
 
$
1,967

 
$
(26,326
)
 
$
64,578


(a) 
Transfers out of Level 3 into Level 2 were principally due to diminished use of unobservable inputs that were previously significant to these fair value measurements and were subsequently sold during 2013.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2012
 
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances, and
Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3
 
Dec. 31, 2012
Asset-backed securities
 
$
9,824

 
$
1,175

 
$
(1,597
)
 
$
(4,798
)
 
$

 
$
4,604

Mortgage-backed securities
 
23,614

 
550

 
(625
)
 
(11,481
)
 

 
12,058

Private equity investments
 
49,489

 
5,206

 
(7,001
)
 
(638
)
 

 
47,056

Real estate
 
11,230

 
6

 
1,843

 
6,194

 

 
19,273

Total
 
$
94,157

 
$
6,937

 
$
(7,380
)
 
$
(10,723
)
 
$

 
$
82,991



54


Benefit Obligations — A comparison of the actuarially computed pension benefit obligation and plan assets for PSCo is presented in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
1,249,739

 
$
1,134,184

 
 
 
 
 
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
Obligation at Jan. 1
 
$
1,152,836

 
$
1,194,371

Service cost
 
23,939

 
25,206

Interest cost
 
53,277

 
46,160

Transfer (to) from other plan
 
(13,404
)
 
11,306

Actuarial loss (gain)
 
133,215

 
(49,384
)
Benefit payments
 
(71,906
)
 
(74,823
)
Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
1,277,957

 
$
1,152,836

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
 
$
1,067,057

 
$
1,055,308

Actual return on plan assets
 
84,871

 
30,684

Employer contributions
 
35,156

 
44,582

Transfer (to) from other plan
 
(11,313
)
 
11,306

Benefit payments
 
(71,906
)
 
(74,823
)
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
 
$
1,103,865

 
$
1,067,057

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Funded Status of Plans at Dec. 31:
 
 
 
 
Funded status (a)
 
$
(174,092
)
 
$
(85,779
)

(a) 
Amounts are recognized in noncurrent liabilities on PSCo’s consolidated balance sheets.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
530,674

 
$
450,202

Prior service credit
 
(18,708
)
 
(21,800
)
Total
 
$
511,966

 
$
428,402

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
 
 
 
 
Current regulatory assets
 
$
31,774

 
$
36,271

Noncurrent regulatory assets
 
480,192

 
392,131

Total
 
$
511,966

 
$
428,402

Measurement date
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
 
 
 
 
Discount rate for year-end valuation
 
4.11
%
 
4.75
%
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
 
3.75

 
3.75

Mortality table
 
RP 2014

 
RP 2000


Mortality — In 2014, the Society of Actuaries published a new mortality table and projection scale that increased the overall life expectancy of males and females. PSCo has reviewed its own population through a credibility analysis and adopted the RP 2014 table with modifications based on its population and specific experience.


55


Cash Flows — Cash funding requirements can be impacted by changes to actuarial assumptions, actual asset levels and other calculations prescribed by the funding requirements of income tax and other pension-related regulations. Required contributions were made in 2012 through 2015 to meet minimum funding requirements.

Total voluntary and required pension funding contributions across all four of Xcel Energy’s pension plans were as follows:

$90.0 million in January 2015, of which $20.0 million was attributable to PSCo;
$130.6 million in 2014, of which $35.2 million was attributable to PSCo;
$192.4 million in 2013, of which $44.6 million was attributable to PSCo; and
$198.1 million in 2012, of which $41.8 million was attributable to PSCo.

For future years, Xcel Energy and PSCo anticipate contributions will be made as necessary.

Plan Amendments — In 2014 and 2013, there were no plan amendments made which affected the benefit obligation.

Benefit Costs The components of PSCo’s net periodic pension cost were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost
 
$
23,939

 
$
25,206

 
$
22,719

Interest cost
 
53,277

 
46,160

 
51,192

Expected return on plan assets
 
(70,709
)
 
(63,821
)
 
(65,302
)
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost
 
(3,092
)
 
(1,064
)
 
228

Amortization of net loss
 
33,892

 
43,418

 
34,332

Net periodic pension cost
 
$
37,307

 
$
49,899

 
$
43,169

 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
4.75
%
 
4.00
%
 
5.00
%
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
 
3.75

 
3.75

 
4.00

Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
 
6.81

 
6.47

 
6.65


In addition to the benefit costs in the table above, for the pension plans sponsored by Xcel Energy Inc., costs are allocated to PSCo based on Xcel Energy Services Inc. employees’ labor costs. Amounts allocated to PSCo were $9.4 million, $11.6 million and $9.6 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Pension costs include an expected return impact for the current year that may differ from actual investment performance in the plan. The return assumption used for 2015 pension cost calculations is 6.81 percent. The cost calculation uses a market-related valuation of pension assets. Xcel Energy, including PSCo, uses a calculated value method to determine the market-related value of the plan assets. The market-related value begins with the fair market value of assets as of the beginning of the year. The market-related value is determined by adjusting the fair market value of assets to reflect the investment gains and losses (the difference between the actual investment return and the expected investment return on the market-related value) during each of the previous five years at the rate of 20 percent per year. As these differences between actual investment returns and the expected investment returns are incorporated into the market-related value, the differences are recognized over the expected average remaining years of service for active employees.

Defined Contribution Plans

Xcel Energy, which includes PSCo, maintains 401(k) and other defined contribution plans that cover substantially all employees. The expense to these plans for PSCo was approximately $9.1 million in 2014, $8.7 million in 2013 and $8.6 million in 2012.


56


Postretirement Health Care Benefits

Xcel Energy, which includes PSCo, has a contributory health and welfare benefit plan that provides health care and death benefits to certain retirees. Xcel Energy discontinued contributing toward health care benefits for former NCE, which includes PSCo, nonbargaining employees retiring after June 30, 2003. Employees of NCE who retired in 2002 continue to receive employer-subsidized health care benefits. Nonbargaining employees of the former NCE who retired after 1998, bargaining employees of the former NCE who retired after 1999 and nonbargaining employees of NCE who retired after June 30, 2003, are eligible to participate in the Xcel Energy health care program with no employer subsidy.

In 1993, Xcel Energy Inc. and PSCo adopted accounting guidance regarding other non-pension postretirement benefits and elected to amortize the unrecognized APBO on a straight-line basis over 20 years.

Plan Assets — Certain state agencies that regulate Xcel Energy Inc.’s utility subsidiaries also have issued guidelines related to the funding of postretirement benefit costs. PSCo is required to fund postretirement benefit costs in irrevocable external trusts that are dedicated to the payment of these postretirement benefits. These assets are invested in a manner consistent with the investment strategy for the pension plan.

The following table presents the target postretirement asset allocations for Xcel Energy Inc. and PSCo at Dec. 31 for the upcoming year:
 
 
2014
 
2013
Domestic and international equity securities
 
25
%
 
41
%
Short-to-intermediate fixed income securities
 
57

 
40

Alternative investments
 
13

 
13

Cash
 
5

 
6

Total
 
100
%
 
100
%

Xcel Energy Inc. and PSCo base the investment-return assumptions for the postretirement health care fund assets on expected long-term performance for each of the investment types included in the asset portfolio. Assumptions and target allocations are determined at the master trust level. The investment mix at each of Xcel Energy Inc.’s utility subsidiaries may vary from the investment mix of the total asset portfolio. The assets are invested in a portfolio according to Xcel Energy Inc.’s and PSCo’s return, liquidity and diversification objectives to provide a source of funding for plan obligations and minimize the necessity of contributions to the plan, within appropriate levels of risk. The principal mechanism for achieving these objectives is the projected allocation of assets to selected asset classes, given the long-term risk, return, correlation and liquidity characteristics of each particular asset class. There were no significant concentrations of risk in any particular industry, index, or entity. Market volatility can impact even well-diversified portfolios and significantly affect the return levels achieved by postretirement health care assets in any year.

The following tables present, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, PSCo’s proportionate allocation of the total postretirement benefit plan assets that are measured at fair value as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2014
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash equivalents (a)
 
$
23,566

 
$

 
$

 
$
23,566

Derivatives
 

 
166

 

 
166

Government securities
 

 
43,494

 

 
43,494

Insurance contracts
 

 
45,075

 

 
45,075

Corporate bonds
 

 
48,527

 

 
48,527

Asset-backed securities
 

 
3,240

 

 
3,240

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
10,071

 

 
10,071

Commingled funds
 

 
252,790

 

 
252,790

Other
 

 
(1,647
)
 

 
(1,647
)
Total
 
$
23,566

 
$
401,716

 
$

 
$
425,282


57


 
 
Dec. 31, 2013
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash equivalents (a)
 
$
18,202

 
$

 
$

 
$
18,202

Derivatives
 

 
(370
)
 

 
(370
)
Government securities
 

 
52,028

 

 
52,028

Insurance contracts
 

 
47,029

 

 
47,029

Corporate bonds
 

 
46,186

 

 
46,186

Asset-backed securities
 

 
2,991

 

 
2,991

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
21,593

 

 
21,593

Commingled funds
 

 
265,620

 

 
265,620

Other
 

 
(15,086
)
 

 
(15,086
)
Total
 
$
18,202

 
$
419,991

 
$

 
$
438,193

(a) 
Includes restricted cash of $0.9 million and $0.6 million at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2014 there were no assets transferred in or out of Level 3. The following tables present the changes in PSCo’s Level 3 postretirement benefit plan assets for the years ended Dec. 31, 2013 and 2012:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2013
 
Net Realized Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances and Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3 (a)
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Asset-backed securities
 
$
670

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(670
)
 
$

Mortgage-backed securities
 
35,394

 

 

 

 
(35,394
)
 

Total
 
$
36,064

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(36,064
)
 
$


(a) 
Transfers out of Level 3 into Level 2 were principally due to diminished use of unobservable inputs that were previously significant to these fair value measurements and were subsequently sold during 2013.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2012
 
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances, and
Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3
 
Dec. 31, 2012
Asset-backed securities
 
$
6,941

 
$
(293
)
 
$
1,669

 
$
(7,647
)
 
$

 
$
670

Mortgage-backed securities
 
24,038

 
(641
)
 
3,429

 
8,568

 

 
35,394

Private equity investments
 
479

 

 
(65
)
 
(414
)
 

 

Real estate
 
144

 

 
35

 
(179
)
 

 

Total
 
$
31,602

 
$
(934
)
 
$
5,068

 
$
328

 
$

 
$
36,064


Benefit Obligations — A comparison of the actuarially computed benefit obligation and plan assets for PSCo is presented in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
Obligation at Jan. 1
 
$
508,971

 
$
599,831

Service cost
 
1,915

 
2,564

Interest cost
 
23,704

 
22,210

Medicare subsidy reimbursements
 
1,753

 
923

Plan amendments
 

 
(14,571
)
Plan participants’ contributions
 
4,625

 
4,589

Actuarial gain
 
(63,130
)
 
(76,889
)
Benefit payments
 
(34,085
)
 
(29,686
)
Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
443,753

 
$
508,971


58


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
 
$
438,193

 
$
425,917

Actual return on plan assets
 
11,060

 
30,390

Plan participants’ contributions
 
4,625

 
4,589

Employer contributions
 
5,489

 
6,983

Benefit payments
 
(34,085
)
 
(29,686
)
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
 
$
425,282

 
$
438,193

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Funded Status at Dec. 31:
 
 
 
 
Funded status (a)
 
$
(18,471
)
 
$
(70,778
)

(a) 
Amounts are recognized in noncurrent liabilities on PSCo’s consolidated balance sheets.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
56,823

 
$
107,232

Prior service credit
 
(40,189
)
 
(46,436
)
Total
 
$
16,634

 
$
60,796

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
 
 
 
 
Current regulatory assets
 
$

 
$
8,798

Noncurrent regulatory assets
 
16,634

 
51,998

Total
 
$
16,634

 
$
60,796

Measurement date
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
 
 
 
 
Discount rate for year-end valuation
 
4.08
%
 
4.82
%
Mortality table
 
RP 2014

 
RP 2000

Health care costs trend rate — initial
 
6.50
%
 
7.00
%

Effective Jan. 1, 2015, the initial medical trend rate was decreased from 7.0 percent to 6.5 percent. The ultimate trend assumption remained at 4.5 percent. The period until the ultimate rate is reached is four years. Xcel Energy Inc. and PSCo base the medical trend assumption on the long-term cost inflation expected in the health care market, considering the levels projected and recommended by industry experts, as well as recent actual medical cost increases experienced by the retiree medical plan.

A one-percent change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects on PSCo:
 
 
One-Percentage Point
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Increase
 
Decrease
APBO
 
$
45,581

 
$
(38,371
)
Service and interest components
 
3,028

 
(2,488
)

Cash Flows — The postretirement health care plans have no funding requirements under income tax and other retirement-related regulations other than fulfilling benefit payment obligations, when claims are presented and approved under the plans. Additional cash funding requirements are prescribed by certain state and federal rate regulatory authorities, as discussed previously. Xcel Energy, which includes PSCo, contributed $17.1 million, $17.6 million and $47.1 million during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which $5.5 million, $7.0 million and $27.5 million were attributable to PSCo. Xcel Energy expects to contribute approximately $12.8 million during 2015, of which amounts attributable to PSCo will be zero.


59


Plan Amendments — In 2014 there were no plan amendments made which affected the projected benefit obligation. The 2013 decrease of the projected Xcel Energy and PSCo postretirement health and welfare benefit obligation for plan amendments is due to changes in the participant co-pay structure for certain retiree groups.

Benefit Costs — The components of PSCo’s net periodic postretirement benefit costs were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost
 
$
1,915

 
$
2,564

 
$
2,825

Interest cost
 
23,704

 
22,210

 
24,527

Expected return on plan assets
 
(30,214
)
 
(29,227
)
 
(25,056
)
Amortization of transition obligation
 

 
785

 
11,004

Amortization of prior service credit
 
(6,247
)
 
(7,666
)
 
(5,150
)
Amortization of net loss
 
6,434

 
13,699

 
10,930

Net periodic postretirement benefit (credit) cost
 
(4,408
)
 
2,365

 
19,080

Additional cost recognized due to effects of regulation
 

 

 
3,891

Net benefit (credit) cost recognized for financial reporting
 
$
(4,408
)
 
$
2,365

 
$
22,971

 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
4.82
%
 
4.10
%
 
5.00
%
Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
 
7.18

 
7.11

 
6.75


In addition to the benefit costs in the table above, for the postretirement health care plans sponsored by Xcel Energy Inc., costs are allocated to PSCo based on Xcel Energy Services Inc. employees’ labor costs.

Projected Benefit Payments

The following table lists PSCo’s projected benefit payments for the pension and postretirement benefit plans:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Projected Pension
Benefit Payments
 
Gross Projected
Postretirement
Health Care
Benefit Payments
 
Expected Medicare
Part D Subsidies
 
Net Projected
Postretirement
Health Care
Benefit Payments
2015
 
$
74,237

 
$
32,300

 
$
2,532

 
$
29,768

2016
 
77,804

 
32,991

 
2,692

 
30,299

2017
 
77,126

 
33,328

 
2,863

 
30,465

2018
 
80,003

 
34,146

 
3,033

 
31,113

2019
 
82,472

 
34,053

 
3,192

 
30,861

2020-2024
 
423,835

 
165,560

 
18,053

 
147,507


9.
Other Income, Net

Other income, net for the years ended Dec. 31 consisted of the following:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Interest income
 
$
1,470

 
$
1,761

 
$
3,603

Other nonoperating income
 
3,601

 
2,603

 
2,233

Insurance policy expense
 
(806
)
 
(1,228
)
 
(1,100
)
Other income, net
 
$
4,265

 
$
3,136

 
$
4,736



60


10.
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Measurements

The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures provides a single definition of fair value and requires certain disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value.  A hierarchical framework for disclosing the observability of the inputs utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value is established by this guidance.  The three levels in the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices.

Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, or priced with models using highly observable inputs.

Level 3 Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those valued with models requiring significant management judgment or estimation.

Specific valuation methods include the following:

Cash equivalents The fair values of cash equivalents are generally based on cost plus accrued interest; money market funds are measured using quoted net asset values.

Commodity derivatives — The methods used to measure the fair value of commodity derivative forwards and options utilize forward prices and volatilities, as well as pricing adjustments for specific delivery locations, and are generally assigned a Level 2.  When contractual settlements extend to periods beyond those readily observable on active exchanges or quoted by brokers, the significance of the use of less observable forecasts of long-term forward prices and volatilities on a valuation is evaluated, and may result in Level 3 classification.

Derivative Instruments Fair Value Measurements

PSCo enters into derivative instruments, including forward contracts, futures, swaps and options, for trading purposes and to manage risk in connection with changes in interest rates, utility commodity prices and vehicle fuel prices.

Interest Rate Derivatives — PSCo enters into various instruments that effectively fix the interest payments on certain floating rate debt obligations or effectively fix the yield or price on a specified benchmark interest rate for an anticipated debt issuance for a specific period.  These derivative instruments are generally designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.

At Dec. 31, 2014, accumulated other comprehensive losses related to interest rate derivatives included an immaterial amount of net losses expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months as the related hedged interest rate transactions impact earnings, including forecasted amounts for unsettled hedges, as applicable.

Wholesale and Commodity Trading Risk — PSCo conducts various wholesale and commodity trading activities, including the purchase and sale of electric capacity, energy and energy-related instruments.  PSCo’s risk management policy allows management to conduct these activities within guidelines and limitations as approved by its risk management committee, which is made up of management personnel not directly involved in the activities governed by this policy.

Commodity Derivatives — PSCo enters into derivative instruments to manage variability of future cash flows from changes in commodity prices in its electric and natural gas operations, as well as for trading purposes.  This could include the purchase or sale of energy or energy-related products, natural gas to generate electric energy, natural gas for resale, and vehicle fuel.


61


At Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo had various vehicle fuel contracts designated as cash flow hedges extending through December 2016.  PSCo also enters into derivative instruments that mitigate commodity price risk on behalf of electric and natural gas customers but are not designated as qualifying hedging transactions.  Changes in the fair value of non-trading commodity derivative instruments are recorded in OCI or deferred as a regulatory asset or liability.  The classification as a regulatory asset or liability is based on commission approved regulatory recovery mechanisms.  PSCo recorded immaterial amounts to income related to the ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013.

At Dec. 31, 2014, net gains related to commodity derivative cash flow hedges recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive losses included an immaterial amount of net losses expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months as the hedged transactions occur.

Additionally, PSCo enters into commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes not directly related to commodity price risks associated with serving its electric and natural gas customers.  Changes in the fair value of these commodity derivatives are recorded in electric operating revenues, net of amounts credited to customers under margin-sharing mechanisms.

The following table details the gross notional amounts of commodity forwards and options at Dec. 31:
(Amounts in Thousands) (a)(b)
 
2014
 
2013
MWh of electricity
 

 
326

MMBtu of natural gas
 
735

 
6,398

Gallons of vehicle fuel
 
127

 
217


(a) 
Amounts are not reflective of net positions in the underlying commodities.
(b) 
Notional amounts for options are included on a gross basis, but are weighted for the probability of exercise.

Consideration of Credit Risk and Concentrations — PSCo continuously monitors the creditworthiness of the counterparties to its interest rate derivatives and commodity derivative contracts prior to settlement, and assesses each counterparty’s ability to perform on the transactions set forth in the contracts.  Given this assessment, as well as an assessment of the impact of PSCo’s own credit risk when determining the fair value of derivative liabilities, the impact of considering credit risk was immaterial to the fair value of unsettled commodity derivatives presented in the consolidated balance sheets.

PSCo employs additional credit risk control mechanisms when appropriate, such as letters of credit, parental guarantees, standardized master netting agreements and termination provisions that allow for offsetting of positive and negative exposures.  Credit exposure is monitored and, when necessary, the activity with a specific counterparty is limited until credit enhancement is provided.

PSCo’s most significant concentrations of credit risk with particular entities or industries are contracts with counterparties to its wholesale, trading and non-trading commodity activities.  At Dec. 31, 2014, seven of PSCo’s 10 most significant counterparties for these activities, comprising $35.3 million or 43 percent of this credit exposure, had investment grade credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s or Fitch Ratings.  The remaining three most significant counterparties, comprising $31.0 million or 38 percent of this credit exposure at Dec. 31, 2014, were not rated by these agencies, but based on PSCo’s internal analysis, had credit quality consistent with investment grade.  All 10 of these significant counterparties are municipal or cooperative electric entities, or other utilities.

Financial Impact of Qualifying Cash Flow Hedges — The impact of qualifying interest rate and vehicle fuel cash flow hedges on PSCo’s accumulated other comprehensive loss, included in the consolidated statements of common stockholder’s equity and in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, is detailed in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to cash flow hedges at Jan. 1
 
$
(23,338
)
 
$
(22,871
)
 
$
(12,377
)
After-tax net unrealized (losses) gains related to derivatives accounted for as hedges
 
(72
)
 
9

 
(9,311
)
After-tax net realized gains on derivative transactions reclassified into earnings
 
(468
)
 
(476
)
 
(1,183
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to cash flow hedges at Dec. 31
 
$
(23,878
)
 
$
(23,338
)
 
$
(22,871
)


62


The following tables detail the impact of derivative activity during the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, on accumulated other comprehensive loss, regulatory assets and liabilities, and income:
 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2014
 
 
 
Pre-Tax Fair Value
Gains (Losses) Recognized
During the Period in:
 
Pre-Tax (Gains) Losses
Reclassified into Income
During the Period from:
 
 
 
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Regulatory
(Assets) and
Liabilities
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Regulatory
Assets and
(Liabilities)
 
Pre-Tax Losses
Recognized
During the Period
in Income
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 
$

 
$

 
$
(730
)
(a) 
$

 
$

 
Vehicle fuel and other commodity
 
(115
)
 

 
(25
)
(b) 

 

 
Total
 
$
(115
)
 
$

 
$
(755
)
 
$

 
$

 
Other derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas commodity
 
$

 
$
451

 
$

 
$
(4,631
)
(e) 
$
(9,850
)
(e) 
Total
 
$

 
$
451

 
$

 
$
(4,631
)
 
$
(9,850
)
 
 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2013
 
 
 
Pre-Tax Fair Value
Gains (Losses) Recognized
During the Period in:
 
Pre-Tax (Gains) Losses
Reclassified into Income
During the Period from:
 
 
 
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Regulatory
(Assets) and
Liabilities
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Regulatory
Assets and
(Liabilities)
 
 Pre-Tax Gains
(Losses) Recognized
During the Period
in Income
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 
$

 
$

 
$
(730
)
(a) 
$

 
$

 
Vehicle fuel and other commodity
 
14

 

 
(40
)
(b) 

 

 
Total
 
$
14

 
$

 
$
(770
)
 
$

 
$

 
Other derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas commodity
 
$

 
$
(4,001
)
 
$

 
$
4,340

(e) 
$
5,850

(d) 
Total
 
$

 
$
(4,001
)
 
$

 
$
4,340

 
$
5,850

 

63


 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2012
 
 
 
Pre-Tax Fair Value
Gains (Losses) Recognized
During the Period in:
 
Pre-Tax (Gains) Losses
Reclassified into Income
During the Period from:
 
 
 
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Regulatory
(Assets) and
Liabilities
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Regulatory
Assets and
(Liabilities)
 
Pre-Tax Gains
(Losses) Recognized
During the Period
in Income
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 
$
(15,082
)
 
$

 
$
(1,819
)
(a) 
$

 
$

 
Vehicle fuel and other commodity
 
63

 

 
(89
)
(b) 

 

 
Total
 
$
(15,019
)
 
$

 
$
(1,908
)
 
$

 
$

 
Other derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity trading
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
2

(c) 
Natural gas commodity
 

 
7,727

 

 
61,820

(e) 
(137
)
(d) 
Total
 
$

 
$
7,727

 
$

 
$
61,820

 
$
(135
)
 

(a) 
Amounts are recorded to interest charges.
(b) 
Amounts are recorded to O&M expenses.
(c) 
Amounts are recorded to electric operating revenues. Portions of these gains and losses are subject to sharing with electric customers through margin-sharing mechanisms and deducted from gross revenue, as appropriate.
(d) 
Amounts are recorded to electric fuel and purchased power.
(e) 
Amounts for the year ended Dec. 31, 2012 included $5.0 million of settlement losses on derivatives entered to mitigate natural gas price risk for electric generation, recorded to electric fuel and purchased power, subject to cost-recovery mechanisms and reclassified to a regulatory asset, as appropriate.  Such losses for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were immaterial.  The remaining settlement losses for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 relate to natural gas operations and are recorded to cost of natural gas sold and transported.  These losses are subject to cost-recovery mechanisms and reclassified out of income to a regulatory asset, as appropriate.

PSCo had no derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges during the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.  Therefore, no gains or losses from fair value hedges or related hedged transactions were recognized for these periods.

Credit Related Contingent Features  Contract provisions for derivative instruments that PSCo enters into, including those recorded to the consolidated balance sheet at fair value, as well as those accounted for as normal purchase-normal sale contracts and therefore not reflected on the balance sheet, may require the posting of collateral or settlement of the contracts for various reasons, including if PSCo is unable to maintain its credit ratings.  At Dec. 31, 2014, there were no derivative instruments with contract provisions that required the posting of collateral or settlement of the contracts. If the credit ratings of PSCo were downgraded below investment grade, derivative instruments reflected in a $1.4 million gross liability position on the consolidated balance sheets at Dec. 31, 2013, would have required PSCo to post collateral or settle outstanding contracts, including other contracts subject to master netting agreements, which would have resulted in payments of $1.4 million at Dec. 31, 2013. At Dec. 31, 2013, there was no collateral posted on these specific contracts.

Certain derivative instruments are also subject to contract provisions that contain adequate assurance clauses.  These provisions allow counterparties to seek performance assurance, including cash collateral, in the event that PSCo’s ability to fulfill its contractual obligations is reasonably expected to be impaired.  PSCo had no collateral posted related to adequate assurance clauses in derivative contracts as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013.


64


Recurring Fair Value Measurements  The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, PSCo’s derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at Dec. 31, 2014:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
Total
 
Counterparty
Netting (b)
 
Total
Current derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas commodity
 
$

 
$
33

 
$

 
$
33

 
$
(18
)
 
$
15

Total current derivative assets
 
$

 
$
33

 
$

 
$
33

 
$
(18
)
 
15

PPAs (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,716

Current derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,731

Noncurrent derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PPAs (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,176

Noncurrent derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,176

Current derivative liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vehicle fuel and other commodity
 
$

 
$
53

 
$

 
$
53

 
$

 
$
53

Other derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas commodity
 

 
548

 

 
548

 
(18
)
 
530

Total current derivative liabilities
 
$

 
$
601

 
$

 
$
601

 
$
(18
)
 
583

PPAs (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,191

Current derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,774

Noncurrent derivative liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vehicle fuel and other commodity
 
$

 
$
46

 
$

 
$
46

 
$

 
$
46

Other derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas commodity
 

 
35

 

 
35

 

 
35

Total noncurrent derivative liabilities
 
$

 
$
81

 
$

 
$
81

 
$

 
81

PPAs (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18,176

Noncurrent derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
18,257


(a) 
In 2003, as a result of implementing new guidance on the normal purchase exception for derivative accounting, PSCo began recording several long-term PPAs at fair value due to accounting requirements related to underlying price adjustments.  As these purchases are recovered through normal regulatory recovery mechanisms, the changes in fair value for these contracts were offset by regulatory assets and liabilities.  During 2006, PSCo qualified these contracts under the normal purchase exception.  Based on this qualification, the contracts are no longer adjusted to fair value and the previous carrying value of these contracts will be amortized over the remaining contract lives along with the offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities.
(b) 
PSCo nets derivative instruments and related collateral in its consolidated balance sheet when supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and all derivative instruments and related collateral amounts were subject to master netting agreements at Dec. 31, 2014. At Dec. 31, 2014, derivative assets and liabilities include no obligations to return cash collateral or rights to reclaim cash collateral. The counterparty netting amounts presented exclude settlement receivables and payables and non-derivative amounts that may be subject to the same master netting agreements.


65


The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, PSCo’s derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at Dec. 31, 2013:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2013
 
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
Total
 
Counterparty
Netting (b)
 
Total
Current derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vehicle fuel and other commodity
 
$

 
$
40

 
$

 
$
40

 
$

 
$
40

Other derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity trading
 

 
2,756

 

 
2,756

 
(1,276
)
 
1,480

Natural gas commodity
 

 
3,341

 

 
3,341

 

 
3,341

Total current derivative assets
 
$

 
$
6,137

 
$

 
$
6,137

 
$
(1,276
)
 
4,861

PPAs (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,715

Current derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
6,576

Noncurrent derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vehicle fuel and other commodity
 
$

 
$
13

 
$

 
$
13

 
$

 
$
13

Total noncurrent derivative assets
 
$

 
$
13

 
$

 
$
13

 
$

 
13

PPAs (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6,892

Noncurrent derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
6,905

Current derivative liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity trading
 
$

 
$
2,438

 
$

 
$
2,438

 
$
(1,039
)
 
$
1,399

Total current derivative liabilities
 
$

 
$
2,438

 
$

 
$
2,438

 
$
(1,039
)
 
1,399

PPAs (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,335

Current derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
6,734

Noncurrent derivative liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PPAs (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23,366

Noncurrent derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
23,366


(a) 
In 2003, as a result of implementing new guidance on the normal purchase exception for derivative accounting, PSCo began recording several long-term PPAs at fair value due to accounting requirements related to underlying price adjustments. As these purchases are recovered through normal regulatory recovery mechanisms, the changes in fair value for these contracts were offset by regulatory assets and liabilities. During 2006, PSCo qualified these contracts under the normal purchase exception. Based on this qualification, the contracts are no longer adjusted to fair value and the previous carrying value of these contracts will be amortized over the remaining contract lives along with the offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities.
(b) 
PSCo nets derivative instruments and related collateral in its consolidated balance sheet when supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and all derivative instruments and related collateral amounts were subject to master netting agreements at Dec. 31, 2013.  At Dec. 31, 2013, derivative assets and liabilities include obligations to return cash collateral of $0.2 million and no rights to reclaim cash collateral. The counterparty netting amounts presented exclude settlement receivables and payables and non-derivative amounts that may be subject to the same master netting agreements.

There were no changes in Level 3 recurring fair value measurements for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

PSCo recognizes transfers between levels as of the beginning of each period.  There were no transfers of amounts between levels for derivative instruments for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value of Long-Term Debt

As of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:
 
 
2014
 
2013
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
Long-term debt, including current portion
 
$
3,890,229

 
$
4,328,968

 
$
3,872,643

 
$
4,059,661



66


The fair value of PSCo’s long-term debt is estimated based on recent trades and observable spreads from benchmark interest rates for similar securities. The fair value estimates are based on information available to management as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, and given the observability of the inputs to these estimates, the fair values presented for long-term debt have been assigned a Level 2.

11.
Rate Matters

Pending and Recently Concluded Regulatory Proceedings — CPUC

Colorado 2014 Electric Rate Case In 2014, PSCo filed an electric rate case with the CPUC requesting an increase in annual revenue of approximately $136.0 million, or 4.83 percent. The requested 2015 rate increase reflected approximately $100.9 million (subsequently updated to $98.7 million) for recovery of costs associated with the CACJA project. The case also requested the initiation of a CACJA rider for 2016 and 2017, which is anticipated to increase revenue recovery by approximately $34.2 million in 2016 and then decline to approximately $29.9 million in 2017. The rate filing was based on a 2015 forecast test year, a requested ROE of 10.35 percent, an electric rate base of $6.39 billion and an equity ratio of 56 percent. As part of the filing, PSCo would transfer approximately $19.9 million from the transmission rider to base rates, which would not impact customer bills. The rider would recover incremental investment and expenses associated with the CACJA project to retire certain coal plants, add pollution control equipment to other existing coal units and add natural gas generation.

In November 2014, several parties filed answer testimony, including the CPUC Staff (Staff) and the OCC. The Staff’s position was based on an ROE of 9.11 percent and a 51.24 percent equity ratio. In addition, the Staff proposed that costs associated with the CACJA project be recovered through a rider mechanism. The OCC recommended an ROE of 9.10 percent, a 52.70 percent equity ratio and that a portion of the costs associated with the CACJA project be recovered in base rates and the remainder through a rider mechanism.

In December 2014, PSCo filed rebuttal testimony, revising its requested rate increase to $107.2 million, or 3.79 percent, reflecting an ROE of 10.25 percent and updated information for both the sales and property tax forecasts. PSCo also proposed to recover all costs associated with the CACJA project through the rider beginning in 2015.

On Jan. 23, 2015, PSCo and intervenors filed a comprehensive settlement agreement, subject to CPUC approval, which would result in an overall 2015 revenue increase of approximately $53.3 million, or 1.87 percent. Key terms of the agreement include the following:

The settlement is based on a 2013 HTY, an ROE of 9.83 percent and an equity ratio of 56 percent;
It includes the implementation of a forward-looking CACJA rider, effective Jan. 1, 2015, a forward-looking TCA rider, effective Feb. 13, 2015 and tracking mechanisms for pension expense and property taxes; and
The agreement also includes an earnings test for 2015 through 2017, under which PSCo and customers would share in any earnings on a 50/50 basis if the ROE recognized falls between 9.84 percent and 10.48 percent. The earnings test principles are based primarily on those established in the previous rate case.


67


The Staff and OCC’s recommendations, PSCo’s rebuttal testimony and the terms of the settlement agreement are summarized as follows:
2015 Rate Request (Millions of Dollars)
 
Staff
 
OCC
 
PSCo Rebuttal
 
Settlement Agreement
PSCo’s filed rate request
 
$
136.0

 
$
136.0

 
$
136.0

 
$
136.0

Transfer from TCA rider to base rates
 
19.9

 
19.9

 
19.9

 
19.9

PSCo’s filed revenue requirement deficiency
 
155.9

 
155.9

 
155.9

 
155.9

Lower ROE
 
(69.1
)
 
(66.5
)
 
(6.2
)
 
(27.9
)
Capital structure
 
(20.9
)
 
(23.7
)
 

 

Rate base adjustments (largely the removal of prepaid pension asset)
 
(20.8
)
 
2.3

 

 

Adjustment to an HTY
 
(82.5
)
 
(82.5
)
 

 
(23.9
)
Adjustment to use 13-month average rate base
 
(26.1
)
 
(22.0
)
 

 

Rate base adjustments for known and measurable plant through September 2014
 
21.9

 

 

 

O&M expense adjustments
 
(7.2
)
 
(16.6
)
 

 

Depreciation
 

 
(3.8
)
 

 

Property taxes
 

 
(12.1
)
 
(5.3
)
 
(5.3
)
Remove CACJA from base rates
 
(62.4
)
 

 
(98.7
)
 
(98.7
)
Updated sales forecast
 

 

 
(15.2
)
 
(15.2
)
Prepaid pension amortization
 

 

 

 
9.5

Non-specified settlement adjustments
 

 

 

 
(31.7
)
Other, net
 
0.1

 
0.1

 
(2.1
)
 
(2.1
)
Total base rate (decrease) increase
 
(111.1
)
 
(68.9
)
 
28.4

 
(39.4
)
CACJA rider mechanism
 
54.2

 

 
98.7

 
97.0

TCA rider mechanism — 2015 forecast test year
 

 

 

 
15.6

Transfer from TCA rider to base rates
 
(19.9
)
 
(19.9
)
 
(19.9
)
 
(19.9
)
Total revenue impact
 
$
(76.8
)
 
$
(88.8
)
 
$
107.2

 
$
53.3


In addition to the revenue reflected in the table above, PSCo estimates that it will defer approximately $3.1 million of additional expenses in 2015 as a result of the settlement.

In its original rate case request, PSCo proposed to shorten the depreciable lives for certain assets, which would have resulted in a material increase in depreciation expense. As a result of the settlement, PSCo will not implement the depreciation changes, but will instead file a standalone case to address depreciation, amortization and decommissioning in early 2016. The results of the depreciation case will become effective as part of the 2018 electric rate case.

Settlement rates became effective Feb. 13, 2015 on an interim basis, subject to refund, and the CPUC is expected to issue a final decision regarding the settlement in the first quarter of 2015.

Manufacturer’s Sales Tax Refund PSCo has deferred 2012-2014 annual property taxes in excess of $76.7 million as part of its multi-year rate plan with the CPUC. To the extent that PSCo was successful in the manufacturer’s sales tax refund lawsuit against the Colorado Department of Revenue, PSCo was to credit such refunds first against certain legal fees, and then against the unamortized deferred property tax balance at the end of 2014.

On June 30, 2014, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled against PSCo’s claim that it was due refunds for the payment of sales taxes on purchases of certain equipment from December 1998 to December 2001. As a result of the adverse ruling, PSCo was required to reduce its 2014 property tax deferral by $10 million, as this amount will not be recovered in electric rates.


68


Annual Electric Earnings Test — As part of an annual earnings test, PSCo must share with customers a portion of any annual earnings that exceed PSCo’s authorized ROE threshold of 10 percent for 2012-2014. In April 2014, PSCo filed its 2013 earnings test with the CPUC proposing a refund obligation of $45.7 million to electric customers. This tariff was approved by the CPUC in July 2014. As of Dec. 31, 2014, PSCo has also recognized management’s best estimate of the expected customer refund obligation for the 2014 earnings test of $74.0 million. PSCo will file its 2014 earnings test with the CPUC in April 2015. The final sharing obligation will be based on the CPUC-approved tariff and could vary from the current estimate.

SmartGridCity (SGC) Cost Recovery — PSCo requested recovery of $45 million of capital costs and $4 million of annual O&M costs incurred to develop and operate SGC as part of its 2010 electric rate case.  In 2011, the CPUC allowed recovery of approximately $28 million of the capital cost and all of the O&M costs.  PSCo subsequently requested recovery of the remaining capital investment in SGC, which the CPUC denied in April 2013.  Based on the ALJ’s previous recommended decision to deny recovery, PSCo recognized a $10.7 million pre-tax charge in 2012, representing the net book value of the disallowed investment, which was included in O&M expense.

Electric, Purchased Gas and Resource Adjustment Clauses

DSM and the DSMCA — The CPUC approved higher savings goals and a lower financial incentive mechanism for PSCo’s electric DSM energy efficiency programs starting in 2015. Energy efficiency and DSM costs are recovered through a combination of the DSMCA riders and base rates. DSMCA riders are adjusted biannually to capture program costs, performance incentives, and any over- or under-recoveries are trued-up in the following year. Savings goals were 384 GWh in 2014 and are 400 GWh in 2015 with incentives awarded in the year following plan achievements. PSCo is able to earn $5 million upon reaching its annual savings goal along with an incentive on five percent of net economic benefits up to a maximum annual incentive of $30 million.

The CPUC approved the 2014 PSCo electric and gas DSM budget of $87.8 million and $12.3 million, respectively. In October 2014, PSCo filed its 2015-2016 DSM plan, which proposes a 2015 DSM electric budget of $81.6 million and a gas budget of $13.1 million and a 2016 DSM electric budget of $78.7 million and gas budget of $13.6 million. A decision by the ALJ is expected in the second quarter of 2015.

REC Sharing — In 2011, the CPUC approved margin sharing on stand-alone REC transactions at 10 percent to PSCo and 90 percent to customers for 2014. In 2012, the CPUC approved an annual margin sharing on the first $20 million of margins on hybrid REC trades of 80 percent to the customers and 20 percent to PSCo. Margins in excess of the $20 million are to be shared 90 percent to the customers and 10 percent to PSCo. The CPUC authorized PSCo to return to customers unspent carbon offset funds by crediting the RESA regulatory asset balance. PSCo credited to the RESA regulatory asset balance approximately $0.6 million and $21.7 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. The cumulative credit to the RESA regulatory asset balance was $105.1 million and $104.5 million at Dec. 31, 2014 and Dec. 31, 2013, respectively. The credits include the customers’ share of REC trading margins and the unspent share of carbon offset funds.

In September 2014, an ALJ issued a decision approving a settlement between PSCo, the CPUC Staff, and intervenors to extend the current sharing mechanism without modification through 2017.

Recently Concluded Regulatory Proceedings — FERC

Transmission Formula Rate Cases — In April 2012, PSCo filed with the FERC to revise the wholesale transmission formula rates from an HTY formula rate to a forecast transmission formula rate and to establish formula ancillary services rates. PSCo proposed that the formula rates be updated annually to reflect changes in costs, subject to a true-up. The request would increase PSCo’s wholesale transmission and ancillary services revenue by approximately $2.0 million annually.  

In June 2012, the FERC issued an order accepting the proposed transmission and ancillary services formula rates, suspending the increase to November 2012, subject to refund, and setting the case for settlement judge or hearing procedures. Several wholesale customers then filed a complaint with the FERC seeking to have the transmission formula rate ROE reduced from 10.25 to 9.15 percent effective July 1, 2012.


69


In September 2014, PSCo and its transmission customers filed a settlement to resolve the ROE issue in the transmission rate filing and complaint. The FERC approved the settlement in October 2014, providing a 9.72 percent ROE effective retroactive to July 1, 2012 for the PSCo transmission formula rate. Refunds were provided to customers in December 2014.

Production Formula Rate ROE Complaint — In August 2013, PSCo’s wholesale production customers filed a complaint with the FERC, and requested it reduce the stated ROEs ranging from 10.1 percent through 10.4 percent to 9.04 percent in the PSCo production sales formula rates effective Sept. 1, 2013. In September 2014, PSCo and its wholesale customers filed a settlement to resolve the complaint along with the pending transmission formula rate ROE matters. The FERC approved the settlement in October 2014, providing a 9.72 percent ROE effective for the PSCo production formula rate. Refunds were provided to customers in December 2014.

12.
Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Capital Commitments — PSCo has made commitments in connection with a portion of its projected capital expenditures. PSCo’s capital commitments primarily relate to the following major project.

Gas Transmission Integrity Management Programs – PSCo is proactively identifying and addressing the safety and reliability of natural gas transmission pipelines. The pipeline integrity efforts include primarily system renewal projects.

Fuel Contracts — PSCo has entered into various long-term commitments for the purchase and delivery of a significant portion of its current coal and natural gas requirements. These contracts expire in various years between 2015 and 2060. PSCo is required to pay additional amounts depending on actual quantities shipped under these agreements.

The estimated minimum purchases for PSCo under these contracts as of Dec. 31, 2014, are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
Coal
 
Natural gas supply
 
Natural gas
storage and
transportation
2015
 
$
321.0

 
$
298.3

 
$
136.3

2016
 
261.3

 
153.0

 
79.6

2017
 
193.6

 
158.8

 
54.8

2018
 
42.4

 
212.3

 
53.9

2019
 
43.2

 
221.7

 
51.8

Thereafter
 
384.0

 
732.7

 
831.1

Total
 
$
1,245.5

 
$
1,776.8

 
$
1,207.5


Additional expenditures for fuel and natural gas storage and transportation will be required to meet expected future electric generation and natural gas needs. PSCo’s risk of loss, in the form of increased costs from market price changes in fuel, is mitigated through the use of natural gas and energy cost-rate adjustment mechanisms, which provide for pass-through of most fuel, storage and transportation costs to customers.

PPAs PSCo has entered into PPAs with other utilities and energy suppliers with expiration dates through 2032 for purchased power to meet system load and energy requirements and meet operating reserve obligations. In general, these agreements provide for energy payments, based on actual energy delivered and capacity payments. Certain PPAs accounted for as executory contracts also contain minimum energy purchase commitments. Capacity and energy payments are typically contingent on the independent power producing entity meeting certain contract obligations, including plant availability requirements. Certain contractual payments are adjusted based on market indices. The effects of price adjustments on our financial results are mitigated through purchased energy cost recovery mechanisms.


70


Included in electric fuel and purchased power expenses for PPAs, accounted for as executory contracts, were payments for capacity of $69.5 million, $72.7 million and $119.5 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At Dec. 31, 2014, the estimated future payments for capacity and energy that PSCo is obligated to purchase pursuant to these executory contracts, subject to availability, are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
Capacity
 
Energy (a)
2015
 
$
82.9

 
$
49.5

2016
 
58.4

 
22.5

2017
 
35.0

 
4.0

2018
 
27.8

 

2019
 
19.0

 

Thereafter
 
47.6

 

Total
 
$
270.7

 
$
76.0


(a) 
Excludes contingent energy payments for renewable energy PPAs.

Additional energy payments under these PPAs and PPAs accounted for as operating leases will be required to meet expected future electric demand.

Leases — PSCo leases a variety of equipment and facilities used in the normal course of business. Three of these leases qualify as capital leases and are accounted for accordingly. The assets and liabilities at the inception of a capital lease are recorded at the lower of fair-market value or the present value of future lease payments and are amortized over the term of the contract.

WYCO was formed as a joint venture between Xcel Energy Inc. and Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC (CIG) to develop and lease natural gas pipeline, storage, and compression facilities. Xcel Energy Inc. has a 50 percent ownership interest in WYCO, and PSCo has no direct ownership interest. WYCO generally leases its facilities to CIG, and CIG operates the facilities, providing natural gas storage services to PSCo under separate service agreements.

PSCo accounts for its Totem natural gas storage service arrangement with CIG as a capital lease. As a result, PSCo had $138.9 million and $144.2 million of capital lease obligations recorded for the arrangement as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

PSCo records amortization for its capital leases as cost of natural gas sold and transported on the consolidated statements of income. Total amortization expenses under capital lease assets were approximately $7.2 million, $6.3 million, and $5.7 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Following is a summary of property held under capital leases:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Gas storage facilities
 
$
200.5

 
$
200.5

Gas pipeline
 
20.7

 
20.7

Property held under capital leases
 
221.2

 
221.2

Accumulated depreciation
 
(49.0
)
 
(41.8
)
Total property held under capital leases, net
 
$
172.2

 
$
179.4


The remainder of the leases, primarily for certain PPAs, office space, railcars, generating facilities, trucks, aircraft, cars and power-operated equipment are accounted for as operating leases. Total expenses under operating lease obligations were approximately $126.2 million, $96.6 million and $77.9 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These expenses include capacity payments for PPAs accounted for as operating leases of $110.1 million, $79.6 million and $59.4 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, recorded to electric fuel and purchased power expenses.


71


Included in the future commitments under operating leases are estimated future capacity payments under PPAs that have been accounted for as operating leases in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. Future commitments under operating and capital leases are:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
Operating
Leases
 
        PPA (a) (b)
Operating
Leases
 
Total
Operating
Leases
 
Capital
Leases
2015
 
$
14.5

 
$
113.8

 
$
128.3

 
$
30.5

2016
 
11.7

 
102.8

 
114.5

 
29.3

2017
 
7.0

 
96.5

 
103.5

 
25.6

2018
 
6.7

 
96.7

 
103.4

 
25.3

2019
 
6.6

 
97.6

 
104.2

 
25.1

Thereafter
 
41.8

 
688.0

 
729.8

 
511.5

Total minimum obligation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
647.3

Interest component of obligation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(475.1
)
Present value of minimum obligation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
172.2


(a) 
Amounts do not include PPAs accounted for as executory contracts.
(b) 
PPA operating leases contractually expire through 2032.

Variable Interest Entities — The accounting guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities requires enterprises to consider the activities that most significantly impact an entity’s financial performance, and power to direct those activities, when determining whether an enterprise is a variable interest entity’s primary beneficiary.

PPAs — Under certain PPAs, PSCo purchases power from independent power producing entities for which PSCo is required to reimburse natural gas fuel costs, or to participate in tolling arrangements under which PSCo procures the natural gas required to produce the energy that it purchases. These specific PPAs create a variable interest in the associated independent power producing entity.

PSCo has determined that certain independent power producing entities are variable interest entities. PSCo is not subject to risk of loss from the operations of these entities, and no significant financial support has been, or is in the future, required to be provided other than contractual payments for energy and capacity set forth in the PPAs.

PSCo has evaluated each of these variable interest entities for possible consolidation, including review of qualitative factors such as the length and terms of the contract, control over O&M, control over dispatch of electricity, historical and estimated future fuel and electricity prices, and financing activities. PSCo has concluded that these entities are not required to be consolidated in its consolidated financial statements because it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance. PSCo had approximately 1,802 MW and 1,441 MW of capacity under long-term PPAs as of Dec. 31, 2014, and 2013, respectively, with entities that have been determined to be variable interest entities. These agreements have expiration dates through the year 2032.

Environmental Contingencies

PSCo has been or is currently involved with the cleanup of contamination from certain hazardous substances at several sites. In many situations, PSCo believes it will recover some portion of these costs through insurance claims. Additionally, where applicable, PSCo is pursuing, or intends to pursue, recovery from other PRPs and through the regulated rate process. New and changing federal and state environmental mandates can also create added financial liabilities for PSCo, which are normally recovered through the regulated rate process. To the extent any costs are not recovered through the options listed above, PSCo would be required to recognize an expense.

Site Remediation Various federal and state environmental laws impose liability, without regard to the legality of the original conduct, where hazardous substances or other regulated materials have been released to the environment. PSCo may sometimes pay all or a portion of the cost to remediate sites where past activities of PSCo or other parties have caused environmental contamination. Environmental contingencies could arise from various situations, including sites of former MGPs operated by PSCo, its predecessors, or other entities; and third-party sites, such as landfills, for which PSCo is alleged to be a PRP that sent hazardous materials and wastes to that site.


72


MGP Sites PSCo is currently involved in investigating and/or remediating several MGP sites where hazardous or other regulated materials may have been deposited. PSCo has identified two sites where former MGP activities have or may have resulted in site contamination and are under current investigation and/or remediation. At some or all of these MGP sites, there are other parties that may have responsibility for some portion of any remediation. PSCo anticipates that the majority of the remediation at these sites will continue through at least 2015. PSCo had accrued $1.8 million and $1.2 million for both of these sites at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There may be insurance recovery and/or recovery from other PRPs that will offset any costs incurred. PSCo anticipates that any amounts spent will be fully recovered from customers.

Environmental Requirements

Water and Waste
Asbestos Removal — Some of PSCo’s facilities contain asbestos. Most asbestos will remain undisturbed until the facilities that contain it are demolished or removed. PSCo has recorded an estimate for final removal of the asbestos as an ARO. It may be necessary to remove some asbestos to perform maintenance or make improvements to other equipment. The cost of removing asbestos as part of other work is not expected to be material and is recorded as incurred as operating expenses for maintenance projects, capital expenditures for construction projects or removal costs for demolition projects.

Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELG) — In June 2013, the EPA published a proposed ELG rule for power plants that use coal, natural gas, oil or nuclear materials as fuel and discharge treated effluent to surface waters as well as utility-owned landfills that receive coal combustion residuals. The final rule is now expected in September 2015. Under the current proposed rule, facilities would need to comply as soon as possible after July 2017, but no later than July 2022. The impact of this rule on PSCo is uncertain at this time.

Federal CWA Section 316(b) — Section 316(b) of the federal CWA requires the EPA to regulate cooling water intake structures to assure that these structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impacts to aquatic species. The EPA published the final 316(b) rule in August 2014. The rule prescribes technology for protecting fish that get stuck on plant intake screens (known as impingement) and describes a process for site-specific determinations by each state for sites that must protect the small aquatic organisms that pass through the intake screens into the plant cooling systems (known as entrainment). The timing of compliance with the requirements will vary from plant-to-plant since the new rule does not have a final compliance deadline. At Dec. 31, 2014, the estimated cost of compliance for PSCo did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Federal CWA Waters of the United States Rule In April 2014, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a proposed rule that significantly expands the types of water bodies regulated under the CWA. If finalized as proposed, this rule could delay the siting of new pipelines, transmission lines and distribution lines, increase project costs and expand permitting and reporting requirements. The ultimate impact of the proposed rule will depend on the specific requirements of the final rule and cannot be determined at this time. A final rule is not anticipated before the second quarter of 2015.

Coal Ash Regulation — PSCo’s operations are subject to federal and state laws that impose requirements for handling, storage, treatment and disposal of solid waste. In 2010, the EPA published a proposed rule on the regulation of coal combustion byproducts (coal ash) as hazardous or nonhazardous waste. The EPA issued a pre-publication version of the final rule in December 2014, which once promulgated will impose new rules to regulate coal ash as a nonhazardous solid waste. PSCo’s costs for the management and disposal of coal ash will not significantly increase under the new rule.

Air
GHG Emission Standard for Existing Sources — In June 2014, the EPA published its proposed rule on GHG emission standards for existing power plants. Comments were due to the EPA on Dec. 1, 2014 and a final rule is anticipated in mid-summer 2015. Following adoption of the final rule, states must develop implementation plans by June 2016, with the possibility of an extension to June 2017 (June 2018 if submitting a joint plan with other states). Among other things, the proposed rule would require that state plans include enforceable measures to ensure emissions from existing power plants in the state achieve the EPA’s state-specific interim (2020-2029) and final (2030 and thereafter) emission performance targets. The plan will likely require additional emission reductions in Colorado. It is not possible to evaluate the impact of existing source standards until the EPA promulgates a final rule and states have adopted their applicable state plans.


73


GHG NSPS Proposal — In January 2014, the EPA re-proposed a GHG NSPS for newly constructed power plants which would set performance standards (maximum carbon dioxide emission rates) for coal- and natural gas-fired power plants. For coal power plants, the NSPS requires an emissions level equivalent to partial carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology; for gas-fired power plants, the NSPS reflects emissions levels from combined cycle technology with no CCS. The EPA continues to propose that the NSPS not apply to modified or reconstructed existing power plants. In addition, installation of control equipment on existing plants would not constitute a “modification” to those plants under the NSPS program. A final rule is anticipated in mid-summer 2015. It is not possible to evaluate the impact of the re-proposed NSPS until its final requirements are known.

GHG NSPS for Modified and Reconstructed Power Plants — In June 2014, the EPA published a proposed NSPS that would apply to GHG emissions from power plants that are modified or reconstructed. A final rule is anticipated in mid-summer 2015. A modification is a change to an existing source that increases the maximum achievable hourly rate of emissions. A reconstruction involves the replacement of components at a unit to the extent that the capital cost of the new components exceeds 50 percent of the capital cost of an entirely new comparable unit. The proposed standards would not require installation of CCS technology. Instead, the proposed standard for coal-fired power plants would require a combination of best operating practices and equipment upgrades. The proposal for gas-fired power plants would require emissions standards based on efficient combined cycle technology. It is not possible to evaluate the impact of these proposed standards until the final requirements are known. In addition, it is not clear whether these requirements, once adopted, would apply to future changes at PSCo’s power plants.

Electric Generating Unit (EGU) Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule — The final EGU MATS rule became effective in April 2012. The EGU MATS rule sets emission limits for acid gases, mercury and other hazardous air pollutants and requires coal-fired utility facilities greater than 25 MW to demonstrate compliance within three to four years of the effective date. PSCo expects to comply with the EGU MATS rule through a combination of mercury and other emission control projects. In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to review the D.C. Circuit’s decision that upheld the MATS standard. It is not yet known what impact the Supreme Court’s decision may have on the MATS standard or its implementation schedule. PSCo believes EGU MATS costs will be recoverable through regulatory mechanisms and does not expect a material impact on results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Regional Haze Rules — The regional haze program is designed to address widespread, regionally homogeneous haze that results from emissions from a multitude of sources. In 2005, the EPA amended the BART requirements of its regional haze rules, which require the installation and operation of emission controls for industrial facilities emitting air pollutants that reduce visibility in certain national parks and wilderness areas. In its first regional haze SIP, Colorado identified the PSCo facilities that will have to reduce SO2, NOx and PM emissions under BART and set emissions limits for those facilities.

In 2011, the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission approved a SIP that included the CACJA emission reduction plan as satisfying regional haze requirements for the facilities included in the CACJA plan. In addition, the SIP included a BART determination for Comanche Units 1 and 2. The EPA approved the SIP in 2012. Installation of emission controls at Pawnee was completed in 2014 at a cost of $272.6 million. Installation of the emission controls at Hayden Unit 1 is scheduled for 2015 and Hayden Unit 2 is scheduled for 2016 at an estimated combined cost of $84.6 million. PSCo anticipates these costs will be fully recoverable in rates.

In March 2013, WildEarth Guardians petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit to review the EPA’s decision approving the SIP. WildEarth Guardians has stated it will challenge the BART determination made for Comanche Units 1 and 2. In comments before the EPA, WildEarth Guardians urged that current emission limitations be made more stringent or that SCR be added to the units. In September 2014, the EPA filed a request with the Court to remand the case to the EPA for additional explanation of the EPA’s decision approving the BART determination for Comanche Units 1 and 2. In October 2014, the Court granted the EPA’s request and vacated the current briefing schedule. The EPA has provided required status reports.

In 2010, two environmental groups petitioned the DOI to certify that 12 coal-fired boilers and one coal-fired cement kiln in Colorado are contributing to visibility problems in Rocky Mountain National Park. The following PSCo plants are named in the petition: Cherokee, Hayden, Pawnee and Valmont. The groups allege the Colorado BART rule is inadequate to satisfy the CAA mandate of ensuring reasonable further progress towards restoring natural visibility conditions in the park. It is not known when the DOI will rule on the petition.

Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM — In December 2012, the EPA lowered the primary health-based NAAQS for annual average fine PM and retained the current daily standard for fine PM. In areas where PSCo operates power plants, current monitored air concentrations are below the level of the final annual primary standard. In December 2014, the EPA issued its final designations, which did not include areas in Colorado.


74


Revisions to the NAAQS for Ozone — In December 2014, the EPA proposed to revise the NAAQS for ozone by lowering the eight-hour standard from 0.075 parts per million (ppm) to a level within the range of 0.065-0.070 ppm. The EPA is also taking comment on a level for the standard as low as 0.060 ppm. In Colorado, current monitored air quality concentrations are above the proposed level of 0.070 ppm in the Denver Metropolitan Area. The EPA is expected to adopt a new ozone standard in a final rule to be issued in October 2015. Depending on the level of the standard, impacted states would study the sources of the nonattainment and make emission reduction plans to attain the standards. These plans would be due to the EPA in 2020 or 2021. Such plans could include installation of further NOx controls on power plants. It is not possible to evaluate the impact of this proposal until the final standard is adopted, the designation of nonattainment areas is made in late 2017 based on air quality data years 2014-2016, and any required state plans are developed.

NOV — In 2002, PSCo received an NOV from the EPA alleging violations of the New Source Review (NSR) requirements of the CAA at the Comanche Station and Pawnee Generating Station in Colorado. The NOV alleges that various maintenance, repair and replacement projects at the plants in the mid to late 1990s should have required a permit under the NSR process. PSCo believes it has acted in full compliance with the CAA and NSR process. PSCo also believes that the projects identified in the NOV fit within the routine maintenance, repair and replacement exemption contained within the NSR regulations or are otherwise not subject to the NSR requirements. PSCo disagrees with the assertions contained in the NOV and intends to vigorously defend its position. It is not known whether any costs would be incurred as a result of this NOV.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Recorded AROs — AROs have been recorded for property related to the following: electric production (steam, wind, other and hydro), electric distribution and transmission, natural gas production, natural gas transmission and distribution, natural gas storage and common general property. The electric production obligations include asbestos, ash-containment facilities, radiation sources, storage tanks, control panels. The asbestos recognition associated with the electric production includes certain plants. This asbestos abatement removal obligation originated in 1973 with the CAA, which applied to the demolition of buildings or removal of equipment containing asbestos that can become airborne on removal. The AROs recorded for PSCo steam and other production related to ash-containment facilities such as bottom ash ponds, evaporation ponds and solid waste landfills. The origination dates on the ARO recognition for ash-containment facilities at steam plants were the in-service dates of the various facilities. PSCo has also recorded AROs for the retirement and removal of assets at certain wind production facilities for which the land is leased and removal is required by contract, with the origination dates being the in-service date of the various facilities.

PSCo recognized an ARO for the retirement costs of natural gas mains and lines and for the retirement of above ground gas gathering, extraction and wells related to gas storage facilities. In addition, an ARO was recognized for the removal of electric transmission and distribution equipment, which consists of many small potential obligations associated with PCBs, mineral oil, storage tanks, treated poles, lithium batteries, mercury and street lighting lamps. The electric and common general AROs include small obligations related to storage tanks, radiation sources and office buildings. These assets have numerous in-service dates for which it is difficult to assign the obligation to a particular year. Therefore, the obligation was measured using an average service life.

In December 2014, the EPA issued a pre-publication version of a final rule imposing requirements for activities involving coal ash waste. The ruling, once effective, will not result in the creation of a new legal obligation and PSCo’s estimated cash flows for the closure of coal ash landfills and impoundments are not expected to significantly increase as a result of the ruling.


75


A reconciliation of PSCo’s AROs for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Beginning Balance
Jan. 1, 2014
 
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Accretion
 
Cash Flow Revisions
 
Ending
Balance 
Dec. 31, 2014 (a)
Electric plant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Steam and other production asbestos
 
$
23,914

 
$
747

 
$
1,597

 
$
10,598

 
$
36,856

Steam and other production ash containment
 
29,234

 

 
1,897

 
30,754

 
61,885

Wind production
 
2,953

 

 
22

 
(880
)
 
2,095

Electric distribution
 
1,176

 

 
43

 
(37
)
 
1,182

Other
 
1,017

 

 
41

 
92

 
1,150

Natural gas plant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gas transmission and distribution
 
788

 
18,252

 
50

 
98,384

 
117,474

Other
 
575

 
2,865

 
24

 
422

 
3,886

Common and other property
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common miscellaneous
 
741

 

 
27

 

 
768

Total liability
 
$
60,398

 
$
21,864

 
$
3,701

 
$
139,333

 
$
225,296

(a) 
There were no ARO liabilities settled during the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Beginning
Balance
Jan. 1, 2013
 
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Liabilities
Settled
 
Accretion
 
Cash Flow Revisions
 
Ending
Balance
Dec. 31, 2013
Electric plant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Steam and other production asbestos
 
$
19,734

 
$

 
$
(941
)
 
$
1,247

 
$
3,874

 
$
23,914

Steam and other production ash containment
 
12,919

 

 

 
684

 
15,631

 
29,234

Wind production
 
2,928

 

 

 
25

 

 
2,953

Electric distribution
 
6,392

 

 

 
178

 
(5,394
)
 
1,176

Other
 
627

 

 

 
60

 
330

 
1,017

Natural gas plant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gas transmission and distribution
 
842

 

 

 
53

 
(107
)
 
788

Other
 

 
575

 

 

 

 
575

Common and other property
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common miscellaneous
 
309

 

 

 
29

 
403

 
741

Total liability
 
$
43,751

 
$
575

 
$
(941
)
 
$
2,276

 
$
14,737

 
$
60,398


Indeterminate AROs PSCo has certain underground natural gas storage facilities that have special closure requirements for which the final removal date cannot be determined; therefore, an ARO has not been recorded for these facilities.

Removal Costs — PSCo records a regulatory liability for the plant removal costs of generation, transmission and distribution facilities that are recovered currently in rates. Generally, the accrual of future non-ARO removal obligations is not required. However, long-standing ratemaking practices approved by applicable state and federal regulatory commissions have allowed provisions for such costs in historical depreciation rates. These removal costs have accumulated over a number of years based on varying rates as authorized by the appropriate regulatory entities. Given the long time periods over which the amounts were accrued and the changing of rates over time, PSCo has estimated the amount of removal costs accumulated through historic depreciation expense based on current factors used in the existing depreciation rates. Removal costs as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were $366 million and $359 million, respectively.


76


Legal Contingencies

PSCo is involved in various litigation matters that are being defended and handled in the ordinary course of business. The assessment of whether a loss is probable or is a reasonable possibility, and whether the loss or a range of loss is estimable, often involves a series of complex judgments about future events. Management maintains accruals for such losses that are probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation. Management is sometimes unable to estimate an amount or range of a reasonably possible loss in certain situations, including but not limited to when (1) the damages sought are indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages, or (3) the matters involve novel or unsettled legal theories. In such cases, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the timing or ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss. For current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on PSCo’s financial statements. Unless otherwise required by GAAP, legal fees are expensed as incurred.

Employment, Tort and Commercial Litigation

Pacific Northwest FERC Refund Proceeding — In July 2001, the FERC ordered a preliminary hearing to determine whether there were unjust and unreasonable charges for spot market bilateral sales in the Pacific Northwest for December 2000 through June 2001. PSCo supplied energy to the Pacific Northwest markets during this period and has been a participant in the hearings. In September 2001, the presiding ALJ concluded that prices in the Pacific Northwest during the referenced period were the result of a number of factors, including the shortage of supply, excess demand, drought and increased natural gas prices. Under these circumstances, the ALJ concluded that the prices in the Pacific Northwest markets were not unreasonable or unjust and no refunds should be ordered. Subsequent to the ruling, the FERC has allowed the parties to request additional evidence. Parties have claimed that the total amount of transactions with PSCo subject to refund is $34 million. In June 2003, the FERC issued an order terminating the proceeding without ordering further proceedings. Certain purchasers filed appeals of the FERC’s orders in this proceeding with the Ninth Circuit.

In an order issued in August 2007, the Ninth Circuit remanded the proceeding back to the FERC and indicated that the FERC should consider other rulings addressing overcharges in the California organized markets. The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for rehearing in April 2009, and the mandate was issued.

The FERC issued an order on remand establishing principles for the review proceeding in October 2011. In September 2012, the City of Seattle filed its direct case against PSCo and other Pacific Northwest sellers claiming refunds for the period January 2000 through June 2001. The City of Seattle indicated that for the period June 2000 through June 2001 PSCo had sales to the City of Seattle of approximately $50 million. The City of Seattle did not identify specific instances of unlawful market activity by PSCo, but rather based its claim for refunds on market dysfunction in the Western markets. PSCo submitted its answering case in December 2012.

In April 2013, the FERC issued an order on rehearing. The FERC confirmed that the City of Seattle would be able to attempt to obtain refunds back from January 2000, but reaffirmed the transaction-specific standard that the City of Seattle and other complainants would have to comply with to obtain refunds. In addition, the FERC rejected the imposition of any market-wide remedies. Although the FERC order on rehearing established the period for which the City of Seattle could seek refunds as January 2000 through June 2001, it is unclear what claim the City of Seattle has against PSCo prior to June 2000. In the proceeding, the City of Seattle does not allege specific misconduct or tariff violations by PSCo but instead asserts generally that the rates charged by PSCo and other sellers were excessive.

A hearing in this case was held before a FERC ALJ and concluded in October 2013. In March 2014, the FERC ALJ issued an initial decision which rejected all of the City of Seattle’s claims against PSCo and other respondents. With respect to the period Jan. 1, 2000 through Dec. 24, 2000, the FERC ALJ rejected the City of Seattle’s assertion that any of the sales made to the City of Seattle resulted in an excessive burden to the City of Seattle, the applicable legal standard for the City of Seattle’s challenges during this period. With respect to the period Dec. 25, 2000 through June 20, 2001, the FERC ALJ concluded that the City of Seattle had failed to establish a causal link between any contracts and any claimed unlawful market activity, the standard required by the FERC in its remand order. The City of Seattle contested the FERC ALJ’s initial decision by filing a brief on exceptions to the FERC. PSCo filed a brief answering the City of Seattle’s exception. This matter is now pending a decision by the FERC.


77


Preliminary calculations of the City of Seattle’s claim for refunds from PSCo are approximately $28 million excluding interest. PSCo has concluded that a loss is reasonably possible with respect to this matter; however, given the surrounding uncertainties, PSCo is currently unable to estimate the amount or range of reasonably possible loss in the event of an adverse outcome of this matter. In making this assessment, PSCo considered two factors. First, notwithstanding PSCo’s view that the City of Seattle has failed to apply the standard that the FERC has established in this proceeding, and the recognition that this case raises a novel issue and the FERC’s standard has been challenged on appeal to the Ninth Circuit, the outcome of such an appeal cannot be predicted with any certainty. Second, PSCo would expect to make equitable arguments against refunds even if the City of Seattle were to establish that it was overcharged for transactions. If a loss were sustained, PSCo would attempt to recover those losses from other PRPs. No accrual has been recorded for this matter.

Other Contingencies

See Note 11 for further discussion.

13.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

PSCo’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, as discussed in Note 1. Under this guidance, regulatory assets and liabilities are created for amounts that regulators may allow to be collected, or may require to be paid back to customers in future electric and natural gas rates. Any portion of the business that is not rate regulated cannot establish regulatory assets and liabilities. If changes in the utility industry or the business of PSCo no longer allow for the application of regulatory accounting guidance under GAAP, PSCo would be required to recognize the write-off of regulatory assets and liabilities in net income or OCI.

The components of regulatory assets shown on the consolidated balance sheets of PSCo at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
See Note(s)
 
Remaining
Amortization Period
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
Current
 
Noncurrent
 
Current
 
Noncurrent
Pension and retiree medical obligations (a)
 
8

 
Various
 
$
32,195

 
$
500,889

 
$
45,504

 
$
447,752

Recoverable deferred taxes on AFUDC recorded in plant
 
1

 
Plant lives
 

 
141,214

 

 
116,477

Contract valuation adjustments (b)
 
10

 
Term of related contract
 
8,901

 
12,999

 
3,620

 
16,474

Depreciation differences
 
1

 
One to seventeen years
 
10,700

 
104,743

 
10,917

 
95,844

Net AROs (c)
 
1, 12

 
Plant lives
 

 
46,213

 

 
39,986

Conservation programs (d)
 
1, 11

 
One to five years
 
10,198

 
10,906

 
13,883

 
19,430

Gas pipeline inspection costs
 
12

 
One to four years
 
5,416

 
3,611

 
5,416

 
14,978

Renewable resources and environmental initiatives
 
12

 
One to two years
 

 

 
22,325

 

Purchased power contract costs
 
12

 
Term of related contract
 
858

 
29,596

 

 
30,069

Losses on reacquired debt
 
4

 
Term of related debt
 
1,426

 
8,378

 
1,572

 
9,804

Recoverable purchased natural gas and electric energy costs
 
1

 
Less than one year
 
18,410

 

 
18,022

 

Property tax
 
 
 
One to three years
 
28,024

 
31,429

 
18,427

 
30,626

Other
 
 
 
Various
 
3,992

 
13,995

 
10,477

 
4,597

Total regulatory assets
 
 
 
 
 
$
120,120

 
$
903,973

 
$
150,163

 
$
826,037


(a) 
Includes $4.5 million and $4.1 million of regulatory assets related to the nonqualified pension plan, of which $0.4 million is included in the current asset at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
(b) 
Includes the fair value of certain long-term PPAs used to meet energy capacity requirements and valuation adjustments on natural gas commodity purchases.
(c) 
Includes amounts recorded for future recovery of AROs.
(d) 
Includes costs for conservation programs, as well as incentives allowed in certain jurisdictions.


78


The components of regulatory liabilities shown on the consolidated balance sheets of PSCo at Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
See Note(s)
 
Remaining
Amortization Period
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Regulatory Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Current
 
Noncurrent
 
Current
 
Noncurrent
Plant removal costs
 
1, 12

 
Plant lives
 
$

 
$
366,359

 
$

 
$
359,387

Deferred electric, gas and steam production costs
 
1

 
Less than one year
 
24,035

 

 
33,247

 

Investment tax credit deferrals
 
1, 7

 
Various
 

 
22,225

 

 
24,038

Deferred income tax adjustment
 
1

 
Various
 

 
18,672

 

 
18,770

Conservation programs (a)
 
1, 11

 
Less than one year
 
32,226

 

 
12,188

 

Renewable resources and environmental initiatives
 
11, 12

 
Various
 
3,308

 
10,376

 

 
1,412

Low income discount program
 
 
 
Less than one year
 
1,680

 

 
4,084

 

Gain from asset sales
 
 
 
One to three years
 
316

 
4

 
1,687

 
368

PSCo earnings test
 
11

 
One to two years
 
57,127

 
42,819

 
22,892

 
19,203

Gas pipeline inspection costs
 
12

 
One to four years
 
13,970

 
642

 

 

Other
 
 
 
Various
 
1,797

 
3,324

 
5,401

 
1,512

Total regulatory liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
$
134,459

 
$
464,421

 
$
79,499

 
$
424,690


(a) 
Includes costs for conservation programs, as well as incentives allowed in certain jurisdictions.

At Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately $104 million and $136 million of PSCo’s regulatory assets represented past expenditures not currently earning a return, respectively. This amount primarily includes certain expenditures associated with renewable resources and environmental initiatives.

14.
Other Comprehensive Income

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
 
 
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2014
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2013
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Jan. 1
 
$
(23,338
)
 
$
(22,871
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
 
(72
)
 
9

Gains reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(468
)
 
(476
)
Net current period other comprehensive loss
 
(540
)
 
(467
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Dec. 31
 
$
(23,878
)
 
$
(23,338
)

Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
 
 
Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
 
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2014
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2013
 
Gains on cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate derivatives
 
$
(730
)
(a) 
$
(730
)
(a) 
Vehicle fuel derivatives
 
(25
)
(b) 
(40
)
(b) 
Total, pre-tax
 
(755
)
 
(770
)
 
Tax expense
 
287

 
294

 
Total amounts reclassified, net of tax
 
$
(468
)
 
$
(476
)
 

(a) 
Included in interest charges.
(b) 
Included in O&M expenses.


79


15.
Segments and Related Information

Operating results from the regulated electric utility and regulated natural gas utility are each separately and regularly reviewed by PSCo’s chief operating decision maker.  PSCo evaluates performance based on profit or loss generated from the product or service provided. These segments are managed separately because the revenue streams are dependent upon regulated rate recovery, which is separately determined for each segment.

PSCo has the following reportable segments: regulated electric utility, regulated natural gas utility and all other.

PSCo’s regulated electric utility segment generates electricity which is transmitted and distributed in Colorado. In addition, this segment includes sales for resale and provides wholesale transmission service to various entities in the United States. Regulated electric utility also includes PSCo’s commodity trading operations.
PSCo’s regulated natural gas utility segment transports, stores and distributes natural gas in portions of Colorado.
Revenues from operating segments not included above are below the necessary quantitative thresholds and are therefore included in the all other category. Those primarily include steam revenue, appliance repair services and nonutility real estate activities.

Asset and capital expenditure information is not provided for PSCo’s reportable segments because as an integrated electric and natural gas utility, PSCo operates significant assets that are not dedicated to a specific business segment, and reporting assets and capital expenditures by business segment would require arbitrary and potentially misleading allocations which may not necessarily reflect the assets that would be required for the operation of the business segments on a stand-alone basis.

To report income from operations for regulated electric and regulated natural gas utility segments, the majority of costs are directly assigned to each segment. However, some costs, such as common depreciation, common O&M expenses and interest expense are allocated based on cost causation allocators. A general allocator is used for certain general and administrative expenses, including office supplies, rent, property insurance and general advertising.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Regulated
Electric
 
Regulated
Natural Gas
 
All Other
 
Reconciling
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Total
2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating revenues (a)
 
$
3,125,937

 
$
1,215,324

 
$
41,888

 
$

 
$
4,383,149

Intersegment revenues
 
339

 
180

 

 
(519
)
 

Total revenues
 
$
3,126,276

 
$
1,215,504

 
$
41,888

 
$
(519
)
 
$
4,383,149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
$
285,968

 
$
89,186

 
$
4,048

 
$

 
$
379,202

Interest charges and financing costs
 
124,118

 
29,987

 
535

 

 
154,640

Income tax expense (benefit)
 
208,095

 
50,874

 
(15,378
)
 

 
243,591

Net Income
 
349,793

 
84,324

 
21,071

 

 
455,188

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Regulated
Electric
 
Regulated
Natural Gas
 
All Other
 
Reconciling
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Total
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating revenues (a)
 
$
3,081,171

 
$
1,080,703

 
$
40,754

 
$

 
$
4,202,628

Intersegment revenues
 
302

 
110

 

 
(412
)
 

Total revenues
 
$
3,081,473

 
$
1,080,813

 
$
40,754

 
$
(412
)
 
$
4,202,628

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
$
280,972

 
$
75,510

 
$
3,935

 
$

 
$
360,417

Interest charges and financing costs
 
129,787

 
30,604

 
554

 

 
160,945

Income tax expense (benefit)
 
220,356

 
42,294

 
(11,910
)
 

 
250,740

Net income
 
368,586

 
69,682

 
15,115

 

 
453,383


80


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Regulated
Electric
 
Regulated
Natural Gas
 
All Other
 
Reconciling
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Total
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating revenues (a)
 
$
2,969,899

 
$
962,435

 
$
36,959

 
$

 
$
3,969,293

Intersegment revenues
 
282

 
90

 

 
(372
)
 

Total revenues
 
$
2,970,181

 
$
962,525

 
$
36,959

 
$
(372
)
 
$
3,969,293

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
$
267,944

 
$
66,983

 
$
3,900

 
$

 
$
338,827

Interest charges and financing costs
 
145,641

 
33,430

 
618

 

 
179,689

Income tax expense (benefit)
 
212,347

 
27,968

 
(7,771
)
 

 
232,544

Net income
 
387,724

 
60,003

 
10,349

 

 
458,076


(a) 
Operating revenues include $14 million, $13 million and $14 million of intercompany revenue for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See Note 16 for further discussion of related party transactions by reportable segment.

16.
Related Party Transactions

Xcel Energy Services Inc. provides management, administrative and other services for the subsidiaries of Xcel Energy Inc., including PSCo. The services are provided and billed to each subsidiary in accordance with service agreements executed by each subsidiary. PSCo uses services provided by Xcel Energy Services Inc. whenever possible. Costs are charged directly to the subsidiary and are allocated if they cannot be directly assigned.

Xcel Energy Inc., NSP-Minnesota, PSCo and SPS have established a utility money pool arrangement. See Note 4 for further discussion.

The table below contains significant affiliate transactions among the companies and related parties for the years ended Dec. 31:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Operating revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric
 
$
9,614

 
$
8,136

 
$
9,271

Other
 
4,441

 
4,441

 
4,441

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchased power
 
23

 
1,331

 
6,539

Other operating expenses — paid to Xcel Energy Services Inc.
 
454,250

 
375,766

 
316,548

Interest expense
 
158

 
132

 
114

Interest income
 
61

 
273

 
122


Accounts receivable and payable with affiliates at Dec. 31 were:
 
 
2014
 
2013
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Accounts
Receivable
 
Accounts
Payable
 
Accounts
Receivable
 
Accounts
Payable
NSP-Minnesota
 
$

 
$
6,706

 
$
18,065

 
$

NSP-Wisconsin
 
22

 

 
8

 

SPS
 
5,803

 

 
1,056

 

Other subsidiaries of Xcel Energy Inc.
 
45,017

 
40,030

 
7

 
45,902

 
 
$
50,842

 
$
46,736

 
$
19,136

 
$
45,902


17.
Summarized Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
 
 
Quarter Ended
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
March 31, 2013
 
June 30, 2013
 
Sept. 30, 2013
 
Dec. 31, 2014
Operating revenues
 
$
1,203,543

 
$
993,704

 
$
1,049,111

 
$
1,136,791

Operating income
 
208,437

 
163,437

 
261,073

 
169,423

Net income
 
118,403

 
89,792

 
154,159

 
92,834


81


 
 
Quarter Ended
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
March 31, 2013
 
June 30, 2013
 
Sept. 30, 2013
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Operating revenues
 
$
1,117,457

 
$
966,429

 
$
1,044,300

 
$
1,074,442

Operating income
 
212,299

 
183,675

 
289,741

 
143,044

Net income
 
116,605

 
97,299

 
166,266

 
73,213


Item 9 — Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A — Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

PSCo maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.  In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO), allowing timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  As of Dec. 31, 2014, based on an evaluation carried out under the supervision and with the participation of PSCo’s management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and the procedures, the CEO and CFO have concluded that PSCo’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

No change in PSCo’s internal control over financial reporting has occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, PSCo’s internal control over financial reporting.  PSCo maintains internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the financial reporting.  PSCo has evaluated and documented its controls in process activities, general computer activities, and on an entity-wide level.  During the year and in preparation for issuing its report for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014 on internal controls under section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, PSCo conducted testing and monitoring of its internal control over financial reporting.  Based on the control evaluation, testing and remediation performed, PSCo did not identify any material control weaknesses, as defined under the standards and rules issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and as approved by the SEC and as indicated in Management Report on Internal Controls herein.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of PSCo’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by PSCo’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit PSCo to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Item 9B — Other Information

None.

PART III

Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Part III of Form 10-K have been omitted from this report for PSCo in accordance with conditions set forth in general instructions I (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-K for wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Item 10 — Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 11 — Executive Compensation

Item 12 — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 13 — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


82


Item 14 — Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information required under this Item is contained in Xcel Energy Inc.’s Proxy Statement for its 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference.


83


PART IV

Item 15Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
1.
Consolidated Financial Statements:
 
 
 
Management Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting  For the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Financial Statements
 
Consolidated Statements of Income  For the three years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income  For the three years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  For the three years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets  As of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013.
 
Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholder’s Equity  For the three years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
 
Consolidated Statements of Capitalization — As of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013.
 
 
2.
Schedule II  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.
3.
Exhibits
Indicates incorporation by reference
+
Executive Compensation Arrangements and Benefit Plans Covering Executive Officers and Directors
t   
Certain portions of this agreement have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the SEC.
2.01* t
Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Riverside Energy Center, LLC and Calpine Development Holdings, Inc., as Sellers, and PSCo, as Purchaser, dated as of April 2, 2010 (excluding certain schedules and exhibits referred to in the agreement, as amended, which the Registrant agrees to furnish supplemental to the SEC upon request) (Exhibit 2.01 to Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).
3.01*
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated July 15, 1998 (Form 10-K, Dec. 31, 1998, Exhibit 3(a)(1)).
3.02*
By-Laws of PSCo as Amended and Restated on Sept. 26, 2013 (Exhibit 3.02 to Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013 (file no. 001-03280)).

4.01*
Indenture, dated as of Oct. 1, 1993, between PSCo and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as trustee,
providing for the issuance of First Collateral Trust Bonds (Form 10-Q, Sept. 30, 1993 — Exhibit 4(a)).
4.02*
Indentures supplemental to Indenture dated as of Oct. 1, 1993, between PSCo and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as trustee:

Dated as of
 
Previous Filing:
Form; Date or
file no.
 
Exhibit
No.
Nov. 1, 1993
 
S-3, (33-51167)
 
4(b)(2)
Jan. 1, 1994
 
10-K, 1993
 
4(b)(3)
Sept. 2, 1994
 
8-K, September 1994
 
4(b)
Nov. 1, 1996
 
10-K, 1996 (001-03280)
 
4(b)(3)
Feb. 1, 1997
 
10-Q, March 31, 1997 (001-03280)
 
4(a)
April 1, 1998
 
10-Q, March 31, 1998 (001-03280)
 
4(b)
Aug. 15, 2002
 
10-Q, Sept. 30, 2002 (001-03280)
 
4.03
Aug. 1, 2005
 
PSCo 8-K, Aug. 18, 2005 (001-03280)
 
4.02
4.03*
Indenture dated July 1, 1999, between PSCo and The Bank of New York, providing for the issuance of Senior Debt Securities and First Supplemental Indenture dated July 15, 1999, between PSCo and The Bank of New York (Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to Form 8-K (file no. 001-03280) dated July 13, 1999).
4.04*
Financing Agreement between Adams County, Colorado and PSCo, dated as of Aug. 1, 2005 relating to $129.5 million Adams County, Colorado Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2005 Series A (Exhibit 4.01 to PSCo Current Report on Form 8-K, dated Aug. 18, 2005, file no. 001-03280).
4.05*
Supplemental Indenture, dated Aug. 1, 2007, between PSCo and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as successor Trustee (Exhibit 4.01 to PSCo Form 8-K (file no. 001-03280) dated Aug. 18, 2007).

84


4.06*
Supplemental Indenture dated as of Aug. 1, 2008, between PSCo and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as successor Trustee, creating $300 million principal amount of 5.80 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 18 due 2018 and $300 million principal amount of 6.50 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 19 due 2038 (Exhibit 4.01 of Form 8-K of PSCo dated Aug. 6, 2008 (file no. 001-03280)).
4.07*
Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 1, 2009 between PSCo and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as successor Trustee, creating $400 million principal amount of 5.125 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 20 due 2019 (Exhibit 4.01 of Form 8-K of PSCo dated May 28, 2009 (file no. 001-03280)).
4.08*
Supplemental Indenture dated as of Nov. 1, 2010 between PSCo and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor Trustee, creating $400 million principal amount of 3.200 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 21 due 2020 (Exhibit 4.01 of Form 8-K of PSCo dated Nov. 18, 2010 (file no. 001-03280)).
4.09*
Supplemental Indenture dated as of Aug. 1, 2011 between PSCo and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor Trustee, creating $250 million principal amount of 4.75 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 22 due 2041 (Exhibit 4.01 to Form 8-K of PSCo dated Aug. 9, 2011 (file no. 001-03280)).
4.10*
Supplemental Indenture dated as of Sept. 1, 2012 between PSCo and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor Trustee, creating $300 million principal amount of 2.25 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 23 due 2022 and $500 million principal amount of 3.60 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 24 due 2042 (Exhibit 4.01 to Form 8-K dated Sept. 11, 2012 (file no. 001-03280)).
4.11*
Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 2013 between PSCo and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor Trustee, creating $250 million principal amount of 2.50 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 25 due 2023 and $250 million principal amount of 3.95 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 26 due 2043 (Exhibit 4.01 to Form 8-K of PSCo dated March 26, 2013 (file no. 001-03280)).
4.12*
Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 2014 between PSCo and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor Trustee, creating $300 million principal amount of 4.30 percent First Mortgage Bonds, Series No. 27 due 2044. (Exhibit 4.01 to Form 8-K of PSCo dated March 10, 2014 (file no. 001-03280)).
10.01*+
Xcel Energy Inc. Nonqualified Pension Plan (2009 Restatement) (Exhibit 10.02 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008).
10.02*+
Xcel Energy Senior Executive Severance and Change-in-Control Policy (2009 Amendment and Restatement) (Exhibit 10.05 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008).
10.03*+
Xcel Energy Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated on Jan. 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.08 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008).
10.04*+
Form of Services Agreement between Xcel Energy Services Inc. and utility companies (Exhibit H-1 to Form U5B (file no. 001-03034) dated Nov. 16, 2000).
10.05*+
Xcel Energy Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as amended and restated Jan. 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008).
10.06*
Amended and Restated Coal Supply Agreement entered into Oct. 1, 1984 but made effective as of Jan. 1, 1976 between PSCo and Amax Inc. on behalf of its division, Amax Coal Co. (Form 10-K (file no. 001-03280) Dec. 31, 1984 — Exhibit 10(c)(1)).
10.07*
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Coal Supply Agreement entered into May 27, 1988 but made effective Jan. 1, 1988 between PSCo and Amax Coal Co. (Form 10-K (file no. 001-03280) Dec. 31, 1988 — Exhibit 10(c)(2)).
10.08*
Proposed Settlement Agreement excerpts, as filed with the CPUC (Exhibit 99.02 to Form 8-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) dated Dec. 3, 2004).
10.09*
Settlement Agreement among PSCo and Concerned Environmental and Community Parties, dated Dec. 3, 2004 (Exhibit 99.03 to Form 8-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) dated Dec. 3, 2004).
10.10*+
Amendment dated Aug. 26, 2009 to the Xcel Energy Senior Executive Severance and Change-in-Control Policy (Exhibit 10.06 to Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2009).
10.11*+
Xcel Energy Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Award Plan Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.08 to Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2009).
10.12*+
Xcel Energy Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Award Plan (as amended and restated effective Feb. 17, 2010) (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Schedule 14A, Definitive Proxy Statement to Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) dated April 6, 2010).
10.13*+
Xcel Energy Inc. 2010 Executive Annual Discretionary Award Plan (Exhibit 10.24 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2009).
10.14*+
Xcel Energy Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective Feb. 17, 2010) (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Schedule 14A, Definitive Proxy Statement to Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) dated April 6, 2010).
10.15*+
Xcel Energy Inc. 2010 Executive Annual Discretionary Award Plan (as amended and restated effective Dec. 15, 2010) (Exhibit 10.23 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2010).

85


10.16*+
Xcel Energy Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Form of Bonus Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.24 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2010).
10.17*+
Xcel Energy Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Form of Performance Share Agreement (Exhibit 10.25 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2010).
10.18a*+
Xcel Energy Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Exhibit 10.26 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2010).
10.18b*+
Xcel Energy Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Exhibit 10.14b to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2012).
10.19*+
Stock Equivalent Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Xcel Energy Inc. as amended and restated effective Feb. 23, 2011 (Appendix A to the Xcel Energy Definitive Proxy Statement (file no. 001-03034) filed Apr. 5, 2011).
10.20*+
Xcel Energy Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (2009 Restatement) (Exhibit 10.07 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008).
10.21*+
First Amendment effective Nov. 29, 2011 to the Xcel Energy Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (2009 Restatement) (Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2011).
10.22*+
Second Amendment dated Oct. 26, 2011 to the Xcel Energy Senior Executive Severance and Change-in-Control Policy (Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2011).
10.23*+
First Amendment dated Feb. 20, 2013 to the Xcel Energy Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Award Plan (as amended and restated effective Feb. 17, 2010) (Exhibit 10.01 to Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
10.24*+
Fourth Amendment dated Feb. 20, 2013 to the Xcel Energy Senior Executive Severance and Change-in-Control Policy (Exhibit 10.02 to Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
10.25*+
First Amendment dated May 21, 2013 to the Xcel Energy Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective Feb. 17, 2010) (Exhibit 10.21 to Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013).
10.26*+
Second Amendment dated May 21, 2013 to the Xcel Energy Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (2009 Restatement) (Exhibit 10.22 to Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013).
10.27*+
Xcel Energy Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Form of Long-Term Incentive Award Agreement (Exhibit 10.23 to Form 10-K of Xcel Energy (file no. 001-03034) for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013).
10.28*
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of Oct. 14, 2014 among PSCo, as Borrower, the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., and Barclays Bank Plc, as Syndication Agents, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Documentation Agent (Exhibit 99.03 to Form 8-K of Xcel Energy, dated Oct. 14, 2014 (file no. 001-03034)).
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Principal Executive Officer’s certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Principal Financial Officer’s certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Statement pursuant to Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
101
The following materials from PSCo’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014 are formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity, (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Capitalization, (vii) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, (viii) document and entity information, and (ix) Schedule II.


86


SCHEDULE II

PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED DEC. 31, 2014, 2013 AND 2012
(amounts in thousands)
 
 
 
Additions
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at
Jan. 1
 
Charged to Costs and Expenses
 
Charged to Other Accounts(a)
 
Deductions from
Reserves(b)
 
Balance at
Dec. 31
Allowance for bad debts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
$
22,505

 
$
17,005

 
$
6,240

 
$
22,628

 
$
23,122

2013
21,918

 
16,784

 
7,005

 
23,202

 
22,505

2012
24,698

 
16,323

 
7,648

 
26,751

 
21,918


(a) 
Recovery of amounts previously written off.
(b) 
Principally bad debts written off.


87


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
 
 
 
Feb. 20, 2015

/s/ TERESA S. MADDEN
 
 
Teresa S. Madden
 
 
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on the date indicated above.

/s/ BEN FOWKE
 
/s/ DAVID L. EVES
Ben Fowke
 
David L. Eves
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ TERESA S. MADDEN
 
/s/ JEFFREY S. SAVAGE
Teresa S. Madden
 
Jeffrey S. Savage
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
Senior Vice President, Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
/s/ MARVIN E. MCDANIEL, JR.
 
 
Marvin E. McDaniel, Jr.
 
 
Director
 
 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(D) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT

PSCo has not sent, and does not expect to send, an annual report or proxy statement to its security holder.


88