-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, PaDd1TktaELeFby7yvh4qYAe1KMpa1UnynqLb+W4VeoKTxaWDnTP7bEp+bNcI9wj 8qjs7qeggxUGUl665tmiEg== 0000950152-06-001906.txt : 20060309 0000950152-06-001906.hdr.sgml : 20060309 20060309155049 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950152-06-001906 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 15 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20051231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20060309 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20060309 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: PARK NATIONAL CORP /OH/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000805676 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS [6021] IRS NUMBER: 311179518 STATE OF INCORPORATION: OH FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-13006 FILM NUMBER: 06676178 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 50 NORTH THIRD ST CITY: NEWARK STATE: OH ZIP: 43055 BUSINESS PHONE: 6143498451 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: P O BOX 3500 CITY: NEWARK STATE: OH ZIP: 43058-3500 10-K 1 l18755ae10vk.htm PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION FORM 10-K Park National Corporation Form 10-K
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
     
þ   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number: 1-13006
Park National Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Ohio   31-1179518
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
     
50 North Third Street, P.O. Box 3500, Newark, Ohio   43058-3500
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(740) 349-8451
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
     
Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
     
Common Shares, without par value   American Stock Exchange LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ           Accelerated filer o            Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: As of June 30, 2005, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common shares (the only common equity of the Registrant) held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $1,452,224,040 based on the closing sale price as reported on the American Stock Exchange LLC.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
     
Class   Outstanding at February 22, 2006
     
Common Shares, without par value   14,017,535 common shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
     
Document   Parts Into Which Incorporated
Portions of the Registrant’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
  Parts I and II
 
   
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 17, 2006
  Part III
Exhibit Index on Page E-1
 
 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
SIGNATURES
EX-4
EX-10.1
EX-10.2
EX-10.4
EX-10.7
EX-10.15
EX-13
EX-14
EX-21
EX-23
EX-24
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32


Table of Contents

PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
General
     Park National Corporation (“Park”) is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “Bank Holding Company Act”). Park was incorporated under Ohio law in 1992. Park’s principal executive offices are located at 50 North Third Street, Newark, Ohio 43055, and its telephone number is (740) 349-8451. Park’s common shares are listed on the American Stock Exchange LLC (“AMEX”) under the symbol “PRK.”
     Park maintains an Internet website at www.parknationalcorp.com (this uniform resource locator, or URL, is an inactive textual reference only and is not intended to incorporate Park’s website into this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Park makes available free of charge on or through its website, its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after Park electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
     Park’s principal business consists of owning and supervising its subsidiaries. Although Park directs the overall policies of its subsidiaries, including lending policies and financial resources, most day-to-day affairs are managed by its subsidiaries’ respective officers.
Subsidiary Banks
     Through its subsidiary banks:
    The Park National Bank (“Park National Bank”), a national banking association with its main office in Newark, Ohio and financial service offices in Butler, Clermont, Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Hamilton, Licking and Montgomery Counties in Ohio;
 
    The Richland Trust Company (“Richland Trust Company”), an Ohio state-chartered bank with its main office in Mansfield, Ohio and financial service offices in Richland County, Ohio;
 
    Century National Bank, a national banking association with its main office in Zanesville, Ohio and financial service offices in Athens, Coshocton, Hocking, Muskingum, Perry and Tuscarawas Counties in Ohio;
 
    The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon (“First-Knox National Bank”), a national banking association with its main office in Mount Vernon, Ohio and financial service offices in Ashland, Holmes, Knox, Morrow and Richland Counties in Ohio;

-1-


Table of Contents

    United Bank, N.A. (“United Bank”), a national banking association with its main office in Bucyrus, Ohio and financial service offices in Crawford and Marion Counties in Ohio;
 
    Second National Bank, a national banking association with its main office in Greenville, Ohio and offices in Darke and Mercer Counties in Ohio;
 
    The Security National Bank and Trust Co. (“Security National Bank”), a national banking association with its main office in Springfield, Ohio and financial service offices in Clark, Fayette, Greene and Miami Counties in Ohio; and
 
    The Citizens National Bank of Urbana (“Citizens National Bank”), a national banking association with its main office in Urbana, Ohio and financial service offices in Champaign and Madison Counties in Ohio,
Park engages in the commercial banking and trust business, generally in small and medium population Ohio communities.
     Park National Bank operates through three banking divisions with the Park National Division headquartered in Newark, Ohio, the Fairfield National Division headquartered in Lancaster, Ohio, and the First Clermont Division headquartered in Milford, Ohio. First-Knox National Bank operates through two banking divisions with the First-Knox National Division headquartered in Mount Vernon, Ohio, and the Farmers and Savings Division headquartered in Loudonville, Ohio. Security National Bank also operates through two banking divisions with the Security National Division headquartered in Springfield, Ohio, and the Unity National Division (formerly The Third Savings and Loan Company) headquartered in Piqua, Ohio.
     Park’s subsidiary banks and their respective divisions comprise Park’s segments. Financial information about Park’s reportable segments is included in Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements located on pages 56 and 57 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders. That financial information is incorporated herein by reference.
     At December 31, 2005, Park’s subsidiary banks operated 126 financial service offices and a network of 137 automated teller machines. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Park’s subsidiary banks operated 127 financial service offices and a network of 138 automated teller machines. These financial service offices span 29 Ohio counties — Ashland, Athens, Butler, Champaign, Clark, Clermont, Coshocton, Crawford, Darke, Delaware, Fairfield, Fayette, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hocking, Holmes, Knox, Licking, Madison, Marion, Mercer, Miami, Montgomery, Morrow, Muskingum, Perry, Richland and Tuscarawas.
     Consolidated Computer Center, a division of Park National Bank, handles the data processing needs of Park’s subsidiaries.
Consumer Finance Subsidiary
     Guardian Financial Services Company (“Guardian Finance”), an Ohio consumer finance company based in Hilliard, Ohio, also operates as a separate subsidiary of Park. Guardian Finance provides consumer finance services in the central Ohio area. As of the date of this Annual Report

-2-


Table of Contents

on Form 10-K, Guardian Finance had eight financial service offices spanning seven counties, including Clark, Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Licking, Montgomery and Richland.
Leasing Subsidiaries
     Scope Leasing, Inc. (“Scope Leasing”), a subsidiary of Park National Bank, specializes in aircraft financing. Scope Leasing’s customers include small businesses and entrepreneurs intending to use the aircraft for business or pleasure.
     Another subsidiary of Park National Bank, Park Leasing Company (“Park Leasing”), was formed in 2001 for the purpose of participating in an automobile leasing program with a major national insurance company. However, that program was terminated during the fourth quarter of 2004 and Park Leasing is winding down its operations.
Insurance Agency Subsidiary
     Park National Bank also has an insurance agency subsidiary, Park Insurance Group, Inc. (“Park Insurance Group”). Park Insurance Group was formed in 2002 and offers life insurance and other insurance products through licensed representatives who work for Park’s subsidiary banks. However, Park Insurance Group’s results to date have not been material to the consolidated entity.
Title Agency Subsidiary
     Park National Bank holds 80% of the voting membership interest of Park Title Agency, LLC (“Park Title Agency”). Park Title Agency is a traditional title agency serving the central Ohio area.
Other Subsidiaries
     Park Investments, Inc., a subsidiary of Park National Bank, Richland Investments, Inc., a subsidiary of Richland Trust Company, and MFS Investments, Inc., a subsidiary of Century National Bank, operate as asset management companies. Their operations are not significant to the consolidated entity.
     Park Capital Investments, Inc. (“Park Capital”), a subsidiary of Park; Park National Capital LLC, whose members are Park Capital and Park National Bank; First-Knox National Capital LLC, whose members are Park Capital and First-Knox National Bank; Security National Capital LLC, whose members are Park Capital and Security National Bank; and Century National Capital LLC, whose members are Park Capital and Century National Bank, operate as capital management companies. Their operations are also not significant to the consolidated entity.
     Park’s remaining subsidiaries are inactive.
Recent Developments
     On December 31, 2004, Park acquired First Federal Bancorp, Inc. (“First Federal”), a savings and loan holding company headquartered in Zanesville, Ohio, through the merger of a newly-formed subsidiary of Park with and into First Federal in an all cash transaction, immediately

-3-


Table of Contents

followed by the merger of the surviving corporation into Park. Following those merger transactions, Century National Bank, a subsidiary of Park, merged into First Federal Savings Bank of Eastern Ohio, which had been a subsidiary of First Federal, and First Federal Savings Bank of Eastern Ohio changed its name to “Century National Bank.” Park paid a total of $46.6 million to the shareholders of First Federal in connection with the acquisition. The Roseville, Ohio financial service office of First Federal Savings Bank of Eastern Ohio was subsequently sold on February 11, 2005 to The Peoples National Bank of New Lexington, Ohio. The deposits sold with the Roseville financial service office totaled $12.4 million and the loans sold with the Roseville financial service office totaled $5.3 million. Century National Bank received a premium of $1.2 million from the sale of deposits.
     On January 3, 2005, Park acquired all of the stock of First Clermont Bank (“First Clermont”) of Milford, Ohio for $52.5 million in an all cash transaction. Immediately following Park’s stock acquisition, First Clermont merged with Park National Bank and has been operated as the First Clermont Division.
     During 2005, Park National Bank concentrated on further expanding its operations in three metropolitan areas in Ohio. The metropolitan areas are Columbus, Cincinnati and Dayton. Park National Bank opened a financial service office in Worthington (near Columbus), opened a financial service office in West Chester (near Cincinnati) and relocated its downtown Dayton financial service office to the Dayton suburb of Centerville during 2005. Additional lenders were added to further increase loans in these markets. The small to medium population Ohio communities, where most of Park’s subsidiary banks are headquartered, have experienced slow economic growth in the past few years. Management expects to continue to concentrate on adding financial service offices in higher growth markets in the next two years. Management anticipates that some of this expansion will be to metropolitan areas outside the state of Ohio and on March 7, 2006, Park National Bank announced plans to establish an office in Florence, Kentucky (near Cincinnati).
     On December 16, 2005, Park announced that the First Clermont Division of Park National Bank will be combined with the three Park National Bank financial service offices in southwest Ohio and will operate as a new division of Park National Bank. This new division will have ten financial service offices in four counties (Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Montgomery) and will be headquartered in Milford, Ohio. The new division will operate under the Park National Bank name. The formation of this new division is expected to be completed during the first half of 2006 and does not require any regulatory approvals.
Services Provided by Park’s Subsidiaries
     All of Park’s subsidiary banks and their respective divisions provide the following principal services:
    the acceptance of deposits for demand, savings and time accounts and the servicing of those accounts;

-4-


Table of Contents

    commercial, industrial, consumer and real estate lending, including installment loans, credit cards, home equity lines of credit and commercial and auto leasing;
 
    trust services;
 
    cash management;
 
    safe deposit operations;
 
    electronic funds transfers;
 
    online Internet banking with bill pay service; and
 
    a variety of additional banking-related services tailored to the needs of individual customers.
     Park believes that the deposit mix of its subsidiary banks is such that no material portion has been obtained from a single customer and, consequently, the loss of any one customer of any subsidiary bank would not have a materially adverse effect on the business of that subsidiary bank or Park.
     Guardian Finance also provides consumer finance services.
Lending Activities
     Park’s subsidiary banks deal with consumers as well as with a wide cross-section of businesses and corporations located primarily in the 29 Ohio counties served by their financial service offices. Relatively few loans are made to borrowers outside these counties. Each subsidiary bank makes lending decisions in accordance with the written loan policy adopted by Park which is designed to maintain loan quality. Each subsidiary bank originates and retains for its own portfolio commercial and commercial real estate loans, variable rate residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, installment loans and credit card loans. Each subsidiary bank also generates fixed rate residential real estate loans for the secondary market.
     Guardian Finance originates and retains for its own portfolio consumer installment loans. Guardian Finance also makes lending decisions in accordance with the written loan policy adopted by Park.
     There are certain risks inherent in making loans. These risks include interest rate changes over the time period in which the loans may be repaid, risks resulting from changes in the economy, risks inherent in dealing with borrowers and, in the case of loans secured by collateral, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the collateral.
     Commercial Loans. At December 31, 2005, Park’s subsidiaries (including Scope Leasing) had approximately $1,346.3 million in commercial loans outstanding (including commercial real estate loans) and commercial leases, representing approximately 40.5% of their total aggregate loan portfolio as of that date. Of this amount, approximately $512.6 million represented commercial

-5-


Table of Contents

loans, $823.4 million represented commercial real estate loans and $10.3 million represented commercial leases.
     Commercial loans are made for a wide variety of general corporate purposes, including financing for industrial and commercial properties, financing for equipment, inventories and accounts receivable and acquisition financing as well as commercial leasing. The term of each commercial loan varies by its purpose. Repayment terms are structured such that commercial loans will be repaid within the economic useful life of the underlying asset. Information concerning the loan maturity distribution within the commercial loan portfolio is provided in Table 4 included in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 29, and is incorporated herein by reference.
     The commercial loan portfolio includes loans to a wide variety of corporations and businesses across many industrial classifications in the 29 counties throughout Ohio where Park’s subsidiary banks operate. The primary industries represented by these customers include commercial real estate leasing, commercial real estate construction, manufacturing, retail trade, health care and other services.
     Commercial loans are evaluated for the adequacy of repayment sources at the time of approval and are regularly reviewed for any possible deterioration in the ability of the borrower to repay the loan. The credit information required generally includes fully completed financial statements, two years of federal income tax returns and a current credit report. Loan terms include amortization schedules commensurate with the purpose of each loan, the source of each repayment and the risk involved. In most instances, collateral is required to provide an additional source of repayment in the event of default by a commercial borrower. The structure of the collateral package, including the type and amount of the collateral, varies from loan to loan depending on the financial strength of the borrower, the amount and terms of the loan and the collateral available to be pledged by the borrower. Most often, the collateral is inventory, machinery, accounts receivable or real estate. The guarantee of the principals will generally be required on loans made to closely-held business entities.
     Commercial real estate loans include mortgage loans to developers and owners of commercial real estate. The lending policy for commercial real estate loans is the same as that for the commercial loan portfolio. The collateral for these loans is the underlying commercial real estate. Each subsidiary bank generally requires that the commercial real estate loan amount be no more than 85% of the purchase price or the appraised value of the real estate securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans made for each subsidiary bank’s portfolio generally have a variable interest rate although occasionally a commercial real estate loan may be made with a fixed interest rate for a term generally not exceeding five years.
     The regulatory limits for loans made to one borrower by Park National Bank, Richland Trust Company, Century National Bank, First-Knox National Bank, United Bank, Second National Bank, Security National Bank and Citizens National Bank were $22.4 million, $5.1 million, $8.2 million, $9.7 million, $2.2 million, $4.6 million, $11.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2005. However, participations in loans of amounts larger than $25.0 million are generally sold to other banks or financial institutions.

-6-


Table of Contents

     Park has a loan review program which annually evaluates substantially all (approximately 90%) of the loans with an outstanding balance greater than $250,000. If deterioration has occurred, the lender subsidiary takes effective and prompt action designed to increase the likelihood of payment of the loan. Upon detection of the reduced ability of a borrower to service interest and/or principal on a loan, the subsidiary may downgrade the loan and, under certain circumstances, place it on non-accrual status. The subsidiary then works with the borrower to develop a payment schedule which they anticipate will permit service of the principal and interest on the loan by the borrower. Loans which deteriorate and show the inability of a borrower to repay principal and do not meet the subsidiary’s standards are charged off quarterly.
     Commercial loans are generally viewed as having a higher credit risk than residential real estate or consumer loans because commercial loans usually involve larger loan balances to a single borrower and are more susceptible to a risk of default during an economic downturn. The total indebtedness of the largest single borrower within the commercial portfolio was $27.9 million at December 31, 2005. Since commercial loans generally have variable interest rates, an increase in interest rates increases the debt service requirement for the borrowing. Credit risk for commercial loans arises from borrowers lacking the ability or willingness to pay principal or interest, and in the case of secured loans, by a shortfall in the collateral value in relation to the outstanding loan balance in the event of a default and subsequent liquidation of collateral. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. Other collateral securing loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on success of the business. Information concerning the loan loss experience and allowance for loan losses related to the commercial loan portfolio and the commercial real estate portfolio is provided in Tables 8 and 9 included in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 33, and is incorporated herein by reference.
     Park National Bank also leases equipment under terms similar to the commercial lending policies described above. Park Commercial Leasing, a division of Park National Bank, originates and services direct leases of equipment which it acquires with no outside financing. Commercial leases are primarily secured by equipment and have little residual risk since the residual values are generally ten percent or less of the financed amount. The estimated residual values of equipment leases are established at inception by determining the estimated residual value for the equipment from the appropriate industry leasing guide. Management re-evaluates the estimated residual values of equipment leases on a quarterly basis from a review of the industry leasing guides.
     Aircraft Financing. Scope Leasing specializes in aircraft financing. Scope Leasing’s customers include small businesses and entrepreneurs intending to use the aircraft for business or pleasure. The lending officers of Scope Leasing are experienced in the aircraft financing industry and rely upon that experience and industry guides in determining whether to grant an aircraft loan or lease. At December 31, 2005, Scope Leasing had outstanding approximately $61.0 million in loans secured by aircraft (which are included in the commercial loan portfolio) and $5.1 million in aircraft operating leases. The estimated residual values of aircraft leases are established at inception using published used aircraft value references. Management re-evaluates the estimated residual values of aircraft leases on a quarterly basis using published used aircraft value references.

-7-


Table of Contents

     Consumer Loans. At December 31, 2005, Park’s subsidiary banks, Park Leasing and Guardian Finance, had outstanding consumer loans (including automobile leases and credit cards) in an aggregate amount of approximately $501.2 million, constituting approximately 15.1% of their aggregate total loan portfolio. Of this amount, approximately $495.0 million represented consumer loans and $6.2 million represented automobile leases. These subsidiaries make installment credit available to customers and prospective customers in their primary market area of central and southern Ohio. Park Leasing had participated in an automobile leasing program with a major national insurance company. However, that program was terminated during the fourth quarter of 2004 and automobile lease lending is de-emphasized. Park Leasing had approximately $3.9 million of automobile leases outstanding at December 31, 2005.
     Credit approval for consumer loans requires demonstration of sufficient income to repay principal and interest due, stability of employment, a positive credit record and sufficient collateral for secured loans. It is the policy of Park’s subsidiaries to adhere strictly to all laws and regulations governing consumer lending. A qualified compliance officer is responsible for monitoring each subsidiary’s performance in this area and for advising and updating loan personnel. Each subsidiary reviews its consumer loan portfolio monthly and charges off loans which do not meet that subsidiary’s standards. Each subsidiary bank (other than the First Clermont Division of Park National Bank) also offers credit card accounts through its consumer lending department. These accounts are administered under the same standards as other consumer loans and leases.
     Consumer loans generally have a higher risk of default than real estate mortgage loans. Consumer loans typically have shorter terms and lower balances with higher yields as compared to real estate mortgage loans, but generally carry higher risks of default. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on these loans. Information concerning the loan loss experience and allowance for loan losses related to the consumer loan portfolio is provided in Tables 8 and 9 included in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 33, and is incorporated herein by reference.
     Residential Real Estate and Construction Loans. At December 31, 2005, Park’s subsidiary banks had outstanding approximately $1,480.6 million in residential real estate, home equity lines of credit and construction mortgages, representing approximately 44.4% of total loans outstanding. Of this amount, approximately $1,059.2 million represented residential real estate loans, $228.2 million represented home equity lines of credit and $193.2 million represented construction loans. The market area for real estate lending by the subsidiary banks is concentrated in central and southern Ohio.
     Credit approval for residential real estate loans requires demonstration of sufficient income to repay the principal and interest and the real estate taxes and insurance, stability of employment, a positive credit record and the appropriate appraised value of the real estate securing the loan.
     Each subsidiary bank generally requires that the residential real estate loan amount be no more than 80% of the purchase price or the appraised value of the real estate securing the loan, unless private mortgage insurance is obtained by the borrower. Loans made for each subsidiary

-8-


Table of Contents

bank’s portfolio in this lending category are generally adjustable rate, fully amortized mortgages. Each subsidiary bank also originates fixed rate real estate loans for the secondary market. These loans are generally sold immediately after closing. All real estate loans are secured by first mortgages with evidence of title in favor of the subsidiary bank in the form of an attorney’s opinion of title or a title insurance policy. Each subsidiary bank also requires proof of hazard insurance with the subsidiary bank named as the mortgagee and as the loss payee. Independent appraisals are generally obtained for consumer real estate loans.
     Home equity lines of credit are generally made as second mortgages by Park’s subsidiary banks. The maximum amount of a home equity line of credit is generally limited to 85% of the appraised value of the property less the balance of the first mortgage. The home equity lines of credit are written with ten-year terms. A variable interest rate is generally charged on the home equity lines of credit.
     Information concerning the loan loss experience and allowance for loan losses related to the residential real estate portfolio is provided in Tables 8 and 9 included in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 33, and is incorporated herein by reference.
     Construction loans include commercial construction loans as well as residential construction loans. Construction loans may be in the form of a permanent loan or a short-term construction loan, depending on the needs of the individual borrower. Generally, the permanent construction loans have a variable interest rate although occasionally a permanent construction loan may be made with a fixed interest rate for a term generally not exceeding five years. Short-term construction loans are made with variable interest rates. Information concerning the loan maturity distribution within the construction financing portfolio is provided in Table 4 included in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 29, and is incorporated herein by reference.
     Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. If the estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, the subsidiary bank making the loan may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the project. If the estimate of value proves inaccurate, the subsidiary bank may be confronted, at or prior to the maturity of the loan, with a project having a value insufficient to assure full repayment, should the borrower default. In the event a default on a construction loan occurs and foreclosure follows, the subsidiary bank must take control of the project and attempt either to arrange for completion of construction or dispose of the unfinished project. Additional risk exists with respect to loans made to developers who do not have a buyer for the property, as the developer may lack funds to pay the loan if the property is not sold upon completion. Park’s subsidiary banks attempt to reduce such risks on loans to developers by requiring personal guarantees and reviewing current personal financial statements and tax returns as well as other projects undertaken by the developer. Information concerning the loan loss experience and allowance for loan losses related to the construction financing portfolio is provided in Tables 8 and 9 included in the section of Park’s 2005

-9-


Table of Contents

Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 33, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Insurance Agency
     Park Insurance Group offers life insurance and other insurance products to its customers through licensed representatives who work for Park’s subsidiary banks. Park Insurance Group’s customers include current customers of Park’s subsidiary banks and other residents in the 29 Ohio counties served by those subsidiaries. Park Insurance Group’s results to date have not been material to the consolidated entity.
Title Agency
     Park Title Agency is a traditional title agency serving residential and commercial customers in the central Ohio area who are seeking title insurance for purchases, construction and refinancing of real estate. Park Title Agency’s customers include current customers of Park’s subsidiary banks and other residents primarily in the 29 Ohio counties served by those subsidiary banks.
Competition
     The financial services industry is highly competitive. Park’s subsidiaries compete with other local, regional and national service providers, including banks, savings associations, credit unions and other types of financial institutions, finance companies, insurance agencies and title agencies. Other competitors include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, insurance companies and financial services subsidiaries of commercial and manufacturing companies. Many of these competitors enjoy the benefits of advanced technology, fewer regulatory constraints and lower cost structures. Many of the newer competitors offer one-stop financial services to their customers that may include services that banks and their subsidiaries may not have been able or legally permitted to offer their customers in the past. The primary factors in competing for loans are interest rates charged and overall services provided to borrowers. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates paid on deposits, account liquidity, convenience and hours of office locations as well as having trained and competent staff to deliver services.
Employees
     As of December 31, 2005, Park and its subsidiaries had 1,824 full-time equivalent employees.
Supervision and Regulation
     Park, its subsidiary banks and many of its other subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation by federal and state agencies. The regulation of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole and not for the protection of shareholders.
     As a bank holding company, Park is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act and to inspection, examination and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”). Park is also under the jurisdiction of the SEC and certain state securities commissions related to the offering and sale of its securities. Park is subject

-10-


Table of Contents

to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Exchange Act, as administered by the SEC. Park’s common shares are listed on AMEX under the trading symbol “PRK,” and Park is subject to the AMEX rules for listed companies.
     Park National Bank, Century National Bank, First-Knox National Bank, United Bank, Second National Bank, Security National Bank and Citizens National Bank, as national banking associations, are subject to regulation, supervision and examination primarily by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and secondarily by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).
     Richland Trust Company, as an Ohio state-chartered bank, is subject to regulation, supervision and examination primarily by the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions and secondarily by the FDIC.
     Guardian Finance, as an Ohio state-chartered consumer finance company, is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions.
     Park Insurance Group, as an Ohio state-chartered insurance agency, and Park Title Agency, as an Ohio state-chartered title agency, are subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Ohio Department of Insurance.
     The following information describes selected federal and Ohio statutory and regulatory provisions and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the particular statutory or regulatory provisions. These statutes and regulations are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to Park and its subsidiaries could have a material effect on their respective businesses.
Regulation of Bank Holding Companies
     Park is registered with the Federal Reserve Board as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act. Bank holding companies and their activities are subject to extensive regulation by the Federal Reserve Board. Bank holding companies are required to file reports with the Federal Reserve Board and such additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require, and are subject to regular examinations by the Federal Reserve Board.
     The Federal Reserve Board also has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies, including, among other things, the ability to:
    assess civil money penalties;
 
    issue cease and desist or removal orders; and
 
    require that a bank holding company divest subsidiaries (including its subsidiary banks).

-11-


Table of Contents

In general, the Federal Reserve Board may initiate enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
     Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to each subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support those subsidiary banks. Under this policy, the Federal Reserve Board may require a bank holding company to contribute additional capital to an undercapitalized subsidiary bank.
     The Bank Holding Company Act requires the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board in any case where a bank holding company proposes to:
    acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank that is not already majority-owned by it;
 
    acquire all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or
 
    merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company.
     The Bank Holding Company Act also prohibits a bank holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank and from engaging in any business other than banking or managing or controlling banks. The primary exception allows the ownership of shares by a bank holding company in any company the activities of which the Federal Reserve Board had determined as of November 19, 1999 to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto. The Federal Reserve Board by regulation had determined that the following activities, among others, were so closely related to banking:
    operating a savings association, mortgage company, finance company, credit card company or factoring company;
 
    performing certain data processing operations;
 
    providing investment and financial advice;
 
    engaging in certain asset management services;
 
    leasing personal or real property, subject to certain restrictions; and
 
    acting as an insurance agent for certain types of credit-related insurance.
     Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on the maintenance of reserves against deposits, extensions of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, investments in the stock or other securities of the bank holding company or its subsidiaries and the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. Further, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or sale of property or furnishing of any services. Various consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of these subsidiaries.

-12-


Table of Contents

Transactions with Affiliates, Directors, Executive Officers and Shareholders
     Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Board Regulation W restrict transactions by banks and their subsidiaries with their affiliates. An affiliate of a bank is any company or entity which controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the bank.
     Generally, Sections 23A and 23B and Regulation W:
    limit the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of that bank’s capital stock and surplus (i.e., tangible capital);
 
    limit the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with all affiliates to 20% of that bank’s capital stock and surplus; and
 
    require that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the bank or subsidiary, as those provided to a non-affiliate.
The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans to the affiliate, the purchase of assets from the affiliate, the issuance of a guarantee on behalf of the affiliate, the purchase of securities issued by the affiliate and other similar types of transactions.
     A bank’s authority to extend credit to executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders, as well as entities such persons control, is subject to Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O promulgated thereunder by the Federal Reserve Board. Among other things, these loans must be made on terms substantially the same as those offered to unaffiliated individuals or be made as part of a benefit or compensation program and on terms widely available to employees, and must not involve a greater than normal risk of repayment. In addition, the amount of loans a bank may make to these persons is based, in part, on the bank’s capital position, and specified approval procedures must be followed in making loans which exceed specified amounts.
Regulation of Nationally-Chartered Banks
     As national banking associations, Park National Bank, Century National Bank, First-Knox National Bank, United Bank, Second National Bank, Security National Bank and Citizens National Bank are subject to regulation under the National Banking Act and are periodically examined by the OCC. Furthermore, they are subject, as member banks, to the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board. Each is an insured institution. Park National Bank, First-Knox National Bank, United Bank, Second National Bank, Security National Bank and Citizens National Bank are members of the Bank Insurance Fund, and Century National Bank is a member of the Savings Association Insurance Fund. As a result, they are subject to regulation by the FDIC. In addition, the establishment of branches by each of Park National Bank, Century National Bank, First-Knox National Bank, United Bank, Second National Bank, Security National Bank and Citizens National Bank is subject to prior approval of the OCC.

-13-


Table of Contents

Regulation of Ohio State-Chartered Banks and Consumer Finance Companies
     The FDIC is the primary federal regulator of Richland Trust Company. The FDIC issues regulations governing the operations of Richland Trust Company and examines Richland Trust Company. The FDIC may initiate enforcement actions against insured depository institutions and persons affiliated with them for violations of laws and regulations or for engaging in unsafe or unsound practices. If the grounds provided by law exist, the FDIC may appoint a conservator or a receiver for a nonmember bank.
     As a bank incorporated under Ohio law, Richland Trust Company is also subject to regulation and supervision by the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions. Division regulation and supervision affects the internal organization of Richland Trust Company, as well as its savings, mortgage lending and other investment activities. The Division of Financial Institutions may initiate supervisory measures or formal enforcement actions against Ohio commercial banks. Ultimately, if the grounds provided by law exist, the Division of Financial Institutions may place an Ohio bank in conservatorship or receivership. Whenever the Superintendent of Financial Institutions considers it necessary or appropriate, the Superintendent may also examine the affairs of any holding company or any affiliate or subsidiary of an Ohio bank.
     As a consumer finance company incorporated under Ohio law, Guardian Finance is also subject to regulation and supervision by the Division of Financial Institutions. Division regulation and supervision designed to protect consumers affect the lending activities of Guardian Finance, including interest rates and certain loan terms, advertising and record retention. If grounds provided by law exist, the Division of Financial Institutions may suspend or revoke an Ohio consumer finance company’s ability to make loans.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
     The FDIC is an independent federal agency which insures the deposits, up to prescribed statutory limits, of federally-insured banks and savings associations and safeguards the safety and soundness of the financial institution industry.
     Insurance Premiums. Insurance premiums for insured institutions are determined during each semi-annual assessment period based upon the members’ respective categorization as well capitalized, adequately capitalized or undercapitalized. The FDIC assigns banks to one of three supervisory subgroups within each capital group. The supervisory subgroup to which a bank is assigned is based on a supervisory evaluation provided to the FDIC by the bank’s primary federal regulator and information which the FDIC determines to be relevant to the bank’s financial condition and the risk posed to the deposit insurance funds (which may include, if applicable, information provided by the bank’s state supervisor). A bank’s assessment rate depends on the capital category and supervisory category to which it is assigned. This assessment currently ranges from 1.32 to 28.32 cents per $100 of domestic deposits. Each of Park’s subsidiary banks is currently paying an assessment rate of 1.32 cents per $100 of domestic deposits. An increase in this assessment rate could have a material adverse effect on the earnings of the affected banks, depending on the amount of the increase.

-14-


Table of Contents

     Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the insured institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition enacted or imposed by the bank’s regulatory agency.
     Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005. In February of 2006, President Bush signed into law the Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 and its companion bill, the Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming Amendments Act of 2005 (collectively, the “Deposit Insurance Reform Acts”), which provide for the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to be merged into a new Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). The Deposit Insurance Reform Acts provide for several additional changes to the deposit insurance system, including the following:
    Increasing the deposit insurance limit for retirement accounts from $100,000 to $250,000;
 
    Adjusting the deposit insurance limits (currently $100,000 for most accounts) every five years based on an inflation index, with the first adjustment to be effective on January 1, 2011;
 
    Providing pass-through deposit insurance for the deposits of employee benefit plans (but prohibiting undercapitalized depository institutions from accepting employee benefit plan deposits);
 
    Allocating an aggregate of $4.7 billion of one-time credits to offset the premiums of depository institutions based on their assessment bases at the end of 1996;
 
    Establishing rules for awarding cash dividends to depository institutions, based on their relative contributions to the DIF and its predecessor funds, when the DIF reserve ratio reaches certain levels; and
 
    Revising the rules and procedures for risk-based premium assessments.
The FDIC is required to adopt rules implementing the various provisions of the Deposit Insurance Reform Acts. The BIF and the SAIF are required to be merged into the DIF by July 1, 2006, while most of the other provisions are required to be implemented by November 5, 2006. Park is not yet able to determine the effect the Deposit Insurance Reform Acts will have on Park and its subsidiary banks.
     Depositor Preference. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that, in the event of the “liquidation or other resolution” of a bank, the claims of depositors of the bank, including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the bank. If a bank fails, insured and uninsured depositors, along with the FDIC, will have priority in payment ahead of unsecured, non-depositor creditors.

-15-


Table of Contents

     Liability of Commonly Controlled Banks. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, a bank is generally liable for any loss incurred, or reasonably expected to be incurred, by the FDIC in connection with (a) the default of a commonly controlled bank or (b) any assistance provided by the FDIC to a commonly controlled bank in danger of default. “Default” means generally the appointment of a conservator or receiver. “In danger of default” means generally the existence of conditions indicating that a default is likely to occur in the absence of regulatory assistance.
Federal Home Loan Bank
     The Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLBs”) provide credit to their members in the form of advances. As a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, each of the subsidiary banks of Park must maintain an investment in the capital stock of the FHLB of Cincinnati. Each of Park’s subsidiary banks is in compliance with this requirement, with the following investments in the capital stock of the FHLB of Cincinnati at December 31, 2005: Park National Bank — $10.8 million; Richland Trust Company — $4.6 million; Century National Bank — $11.6 million; First-Knox National Bank — $11.4 million; United Bank — $1.2 million; Second National Bank — $3.1 million; Security National Bank — $7.9 million; and Citizens National Bank — $1.5 million.
     Upon the origination or renewal of a loan or advance, each FHLB is required by law to obtain and maintain a security interest in certain types of collateral primarily in one or more of the following categories: fully-disbursed, whole first mortgage loans on improved residential property not more than 90 days delinquent or securities representing a whole interest in such loans; securities issued, insured or guaranteed by the United States Government or an agency thereof; deposits in any FHLB; or other real estate related collateral acceptable to the applicable FHLB, if such collateral has a readily ascertainable value and the FHLB can perfect its security interest in the collateral.
     Each FHLB is required to establish standards of community investment or service that its members must maintain for continued access to long-term advances from the FHLB. The standards take into account a member’s performance under the Community Reinvestment Act and its record of lending to first-time home buyers. All long-term advances by each FHLB must be made only to provide funds for residential housing finance.
Regulatory Capital
     The Federal Reserve Board has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies and state member banks. The OCC and the FDIC have adopted risk-based capital guidelines for national banks and state non-member banks, respectively. The guidelines provide a systematic analytical framework which makes regulatory capital requirements sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banking organizations, takes off-balance sheet exposures expressly into account in evaluating capital adequacy, and minimizes disincentives to holding liquid, low-risk assets. Capital levels as measured by these standards are also used to categorize financial institutions for purposes of certain prompt corrective action regulatory provisions.
     The minimum guideline for the ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet items such as standby letters of credit) is 8%. At least half of the minimum total risk-based capital ratio (4%) must be composed of common shareholders’ equity, minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries and a limited amount of qualifying

-16-


Table of Contents

preferred stock, less goodwill and certain other deductions, including the unrealized net gains and losses, after applicable taxes, on available-for-sale securities carried at fair value (commonly known as “Tier 1” risk-based capital). The remainder of total risk-based capital (commonly known as “Tier 2” risk-based capital) may consist of certain amounts of hybrid capital instruments, mandatory convertible debt, subordinated debt, preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 capital, loan and lease loss allowance and net unrealized gains, after applicable taxes, on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, all subject to limitations established by the guidelines.
     Under the guidelines, capital is compared to the relative risk related to the balance sheet. To derive the risk included in the balance sheet, one of four risk weights (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) is applied to different balance sheet and off-balance sheet assets, primarily based on the relative credit risk of the counterparty. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
     The Federal Reserve Board has established minimum leverage ratio guidelines for bank holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board guidelines provide for a minimum ratio of Tier 1 risk-based capital to average assets (excluding the loan and lease loss allowance, goodwill and certain other intangibles), or “leverage ratio,” of 3% for bank holding companies that meet certain criteria, including having the highest regulatory rating, and 4% for all other bank holding companies. The guidelines further provide that bank holding companies making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum levels. The OCC and the FDIC have each also adopted minimum leverage ratio guidelines for national banks and for state non-member banks, respectively.
     The Federal Reserve Bank’s review of certain bank holding company transactions is affected by whether the applying bank holding company is “well-capitalized.” To be deemed “well-capitalized,” the bank holding company must have a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%, and must not be subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive issued by the Federal Reserve Board to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure.
     The federal banking agencies have established a system of prompt corrective action to resolve certain of the problems of undercapitalized institutions. This system is based on five capital level categories for insured depository institutions: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” and “critically undercapitalized.”
     The federal banking agencies may (or in some cases must) take certain supervisory actions depending upon a bank’s capital level. For example, the banking agencies must appoint a receiver or conservator for a bank within 90 days after it becomes “critically undercapitalized” unless the bank’s primary regulator determines, with the concurrence of the FDIC, that other action would better achieve regulatory purposes. Banking operations otherwise may be significantly affected depending on a bank’s capital category. For example, a bank that is not “well capitalized” generally is prohibited from accepting brokered deposits and offering interest rates on deposits higher than the prevailing rate in its market, and the holding company of any undercapitalized depository institution must guarantee, in part, specific aspects of the bank’s capital plan for the plan to be acceptable.

-17-


Table of Contents

     Park is in compliance with the current applicable capital guideline ratios. In order to be “well-capitalized,” a bank must have total risk-based capital of at least 10%, Tier 1 risk-based capital of at least 6% and a leverage ratio of at least 5%, and the bank must not be subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. As of December 31, 2005, Park had a total risk-based capital ratio of 15.43%, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 14.17% and a leverage ratio of 9.27%. Park’s management believes that Park as well as each of its subsidiary banks is “well capitalized” according to the guidelines described above. See Note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements located on page 56 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Fiscal and Monetary Policies
     The business and earnings of Park are affected significantly by the fiscal and monetary policies of the United States Government and its agencies. Park is particularly affected by the policies of the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. These policies are used in varying degrees and combinations to directly affect the availability of bank loans and deposits, as well as the interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits.
Limits on Dividends and Other Payments
     There are various legal limitations on the extent to which subsidiary banks may finance or otherwise supply funds to their parent holding companies. Under federal and Ohio law, subsidiary banks may not, subject to certain limited exceptions, make loans or extensions of credit to, or investments in the securities of, their bank holding companies. Subsidiary banks are also subject to collateral security requirements for any loans or extension of credit permitted by such exceptions.
     None of the Park’s subsidiary banks may pay dividends out of its surplus if, after paying these dividends, it would fail to meet the required minimum levels under the risk-based capital guidelines and minimum leverage ratio requirements established by the OCC and the FDIC. In addition, each subsidiary bank must have the approval of its regulatory authority if a dividend in any year would cause the total dividends for that year to exceed the sum of the subsidiary bank’s current year’s “net profits” (or net income, less dividends declared during the period based on regulatory accounting principles) and the retained net profits for the preceding two years, less required transfers to surplus. Payment of dividends by any of Park’s subsidiary banks may be restricted at any time at the discretion of its regulatory authorities, if such regulatory authorities deem such dividends to constitute unsafe and/or unsound banking practices or if necessary to maintain adequate capital.
     The ability of Park to obtain funds for the payment of dividends and for other cash requirements is largely dependent on the amount of dividends which may be declared by its subsidiary banks. However, the Federal Reserve Board expects Park to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks, which may require Park to retain capital for further investment in its subsidiary banks, rather than pay dividends to the Park shareholders. Payment of dividends by one of Park’s subsidiary banks may be restricted at any time at the discretion of its applicable regulatory authorities, if they deem such dividends to constitute an unsafe and/or unsound banking practice.

-18-


Table of Contents

These provisions could have the effect of limiting Park’s ability to pay dividends on its common shares.
Financial Activities Permitted
     Bank holding companies may become financial holding companies and thereby affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature. A bank holding company may become a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized, is well managed, and has at least a satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act, by filing a declaration that the bank holding company wishes to become a financial holding company. No regulatory approval will be required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board.
     “Financial in nature” is defined to include, in general:
    securities underwriting, dealing and market making;
 
    sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies;
 
    insurance underwriting and agency;
 
    merchant banking activities; and
 
    activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be closely related to banking.
     A national bank also may engage, subject to limitations on investment, in activities that are financial in nature (other than insurance underwriting, insurance company portfolio investment, real estate development and real estate investment) through a financial subsidiary of the bank, if the bank is well capitalized and well managed, has at least a satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating and has received the prior approval of the OCC to engage in such activities. Subsidiary banks of a financial holding company or national banks with financial subsidiaries must continue to be well capitalized and well managed in order to continue to engage in activities that are financial in nature without regulatory actions or restrictions, which could include divestiture of the financial-in-nature subsidiary or subsidiaries. In addition, a financial holding company or a bank may not acquire a company that is engaged in activities that are financial in nature unless each of the subsidiary banks of the financial holding company or the bank has a Community Reinvestment Act rating of satisfactory or better.
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Park had not elected to become a financial holding company.
Privacy Provisions of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
     Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, federal banking regulators were required to adopt rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information

-19-


Table of Contents

about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated third party.
Patriot Act
     In response to the terrorist events of September 11, 2001, the Uniting and Strengthening of America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorist Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”) was signed into law in October 2001. The Patriot Act gives the United States Government new powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers, increased information sharing and broadened anti-money laundering requirements. Title III of the Patriot Act takes measures intended to encourage information sharing among bank regulatory agencies and law enforcement bodies. Further, certain provisions of Title III impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of financial institutions. Among other requirements, Title III and related regulations require regulated financial institutions to establish a program specifying procedures for obtaining identifying information from customers seeking to open new accounts and establish enhanced due diligence policies, procedures and controls designed to detect and report suspicious activity. Parks’ subsidiary banks have established policies and procedures to comply with the requirements of the Patriot Act.
Future Legislation
     Various legislation affecting financial institutions and the financial industry is from time to time introduced in Congress. Such legislation may change banking statutes and the operating environment of Park and its subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways, and could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions and other financial institutions. Park cannot predict whether any of this potential legislation will be enacted, and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on the financial condition or results of operations of Park or any of its subsidiaries.
Corporate Governance
     As mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC has adopted rules and regulations governing, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. AMEX has also adopted corporate governance rules. The Board of Directors of Park has taken a series of actions to strengthen and improve Park’s already strong corporate governance practices in light of the rules of the SEC and AMEX. The Board of Directors has adopted charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics governing the directors, officers and associates of Park and its affiliates. In addition, Park has implemented a “whistleblower” hotline called the “PRK Improvement Line.” Calls that relate to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters or that relate to possible wrongdoing by associates of Park or one of its affiliates can be made anonymously through this hotline. The calls are received by an independent third party service and forwarded directly to the Chair of the Audit Committee and the Head of Internal Audit. The PRK Improvement Line number is 1-800-418-6423, Ext. PRK (775).

-20-


Table of Contents

     The text of each of the Audit Committee Charter, the Nominating Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee Charter and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the “Governance Documents (Corporate Governance)” section of the “Investor Relations” page of Park’s website located at www.parknationalcorp.com. Interested persons may also obtain copies of these documents, without charge, by writing to the President of Park at Park National Corporation, 50 North Third Street, P.O. Box 3500, Newark, Ohio 43058-3500, Attention: David L. Trautman.
Statistical Disclosure
     The statistical disclosure relating to Park and its subsidiaries required under the SEC’s Industry Guide 3, “Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies,” is included in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on pages 26 through 36, and in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements located on pages 46 through 49 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements located on pages 49 through 51 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements located on page 51 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders and Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements located on page 52 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders. This statistical disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
Effect of Environmental Regulation
     Compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has not had a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of Park and its subsidiaries. Park believes the nature of the operations of its subsidiaries has little, if any, environmental impact. Park, therefore, anticipates no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities for its current fiscal year or for the foreseeable future.
     Park believes its primary exposure to environmental risk is through the lending activities of its subsidiaries. In cases where management believes environmental risk potentially exists, Park’s subsidiaries mitigate their environmental risk exposures by requiring environmental site assessments at the time of loan origination to confirm collateral quality as to commercial real estate parcels posing higher than normal potential for environmental impact, as determined by reference to present and past uses of the subject property and adjacent sites. Environmental assessments are typically required prior to any foreclosure activity involving non-residential real estate collateral.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
     Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without limitation, the statements specifically identified as forward-looking statements within this document. In addition, certain statements in future filings by Park with the SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of Park which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements

-21-


Table of Contents

within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Examples of forward-looking statements include: (i) projections of income or expense, earnings per share, the payment or non-payment of dividends, capital structure and other financial items; (ii) statements of plans and objectives of Park or our management or Board of Directors, including those relating to products or services; (iii) statements of future economic performance; and (iv) statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “targeted”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying those statements.
     The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information so long as those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of that Act.
     Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those predicted by the forward-looking statements because of various factors and possible events, including those factors identified below. There is also the risk that Park’s management or Board of Directors incorrectly analyzes these risks and forces, or that the strategies Park develops to address them are unsuccessful.
     Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except as may be required by law, Park undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made to reflect unanticipated events. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Park or any person acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by the following cautionary statements.
Changes in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
     Our earnings depend substantially on our interest rate spread, which is the difference between (i) the rates we earn on loans, investment securities and other interest earning assets and (ii) the interest rates we pay on deposits and our borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory authorities. While we have taken measures intended to manage the risks of operating in a changing interest rate environment, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in avoiding undue interest rate risk.
Changes in economic and political conditions could adversely affect our earnings, as our borrowers’ ability to repay loans and the value of the collateral securing our loans decline.
     Our success depends, to a certain extent, upon economic and political conditions, local and national, as well as governmental monetary policies. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, changes in interest rates, money supply and other factors beyond our control may adversely affect our asset quality, deposit levels and loan demand and, therefore, our earnings.

-22-


Table of Contents

Because we have a significant amount of real estate loans, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral. Adverse changes in the economy may also have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which would have an adverse impact on our earnings. In addition, substantially all of our loans are to individuals and businesses in Ohio. Consequently, a significant decline in the economy in Ohio could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in an extremely competitive market, and our business will suffer if we are unable to compete effectively.
     In our market area, we encounter significant competition from other local, regional and national service providers, including banks, savings associations, credit unions and other types of financial institutions, finance companies, insurance agencies and title agencies. Other competitors include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, insurance companies and financial services subsidiaries of commercial and manufacturing companies. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. Many of our competitors enjoy the benefits of advanced technology, fewer regulatory constraints and lower cost structures. Many of the new competitors offer one-stop financial services to their customers that may include services that banks and their subsidiaries may not have been able or legally permitted to offer their customers in the past. Our ability to maintain our history of strong financial performance and return on investment to shareholders will depend in part on our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area and on our ability to expand our scope of available financial services as needed to meet the needs and demands of our customers.
We depend upon the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.
     In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers and counterparties, we may rely on information provided to us by customers and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information. We may also rely on representations of customers and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. For example, in deciding whether to extend credit to a business, we may assume that the customer’s audited financial statements conform with generally accepted accounting principles and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. We may also rely on the audit report covering those financial statements. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted to the extent we rely on financial statements that do not comply with generally accepted accounting principles or that are materially misleading.
Legislative or regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation, could adversely impact us or the businesses in which we are engaged.
     The financial services industry is extensively regulated. We are subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost all aspects of our operations. Laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for

-23-


Table of Contents

the protection of consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds, and not to benefit our shareholders. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact us or our ability to increase the value of our business. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on the operation of an institution, the classification of assets by the institution and the adequacy of an institution’s allowance for loan losses. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against us could cause us to devote significant time and resources to defending our business and may lead to penalties that materially affect us and our shareholders. Proposals to change the laws governing financial institutions are frequently raised in Congress and before bank regulatory authorities. It is impossible to predict the ultimate form any proposed legislation might take or how it might affect us. Future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations or enforcement could be materially adverse to our business and our shareholders.
Environmental liability associated with commercial lending could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
     In the course of our business, we may acquire, through foreclosure, commercial properties securing loans that are in default. There is a risk that hazardous substances could be discovered on those properties. In this event, we could be required to remove the substances from and remediate the properties at our cost and expense. The cost of removal and environmental remediation could be substantial. We may not have adequate remedies against the owners of the properties or other responsible parties and could find it difficult or impossible to sell the affected properties. These events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.
Our business strategy includes growth plans. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.
     We intend to continue pursuing a profitable growth strategy. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in growth stages of development. We cannot assure you that we will be able to expand our market presence in our existing markets or successfully enter new markets or that any such expansion will not adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Also, if we grow more slowly than anticipated, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.
     Our ability to grow successfully will depend on a variety of factors including the continued availability of desirable business opportunities, the competitive responses from other financial institutions in our market areas and our ability to manage our growth. While we believe we have the management resources and internal systems in place to successfully manage our future growth, there can be no assurance growth opportunities will be available or growth will be successfully managed.
     We may incur substantial costs to expand, and we can give no assurance such expansion will result in the levels of profits we seek. There can be no assurance integration efforts for any

-24-


Table of Contents

future mergers or acquisitions will be successful. Also, we may issue equity securities in connection with future acquisitions, which could cause ownership and economic dilution to our current shareholders. There is no assurance that, following any future mergers or acquisitions, our integration efforts will be successful or that, after giving effect to the acquisition, we will achieve profits comparable to or better than our historical experience.
Difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities with our own operations may prevent us from achieving the expected benefits from our acquisitions.
     We may not be able to achieve fully the strategic objectives and operating efficiencies in an acquisition. The costs or difficulties relating to the integration of our recent acquisitions may be greater than expected or the costs savings or any revenue synergies of the combined entities may be lower or take longer to realize than expected. Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired entity. In addition, the markets and industries in which we and our potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive. We may lose customers or the customers of acquired entities as a result of an acquisition. We also may lose key personnel, either from the acquired entity or from itself, as a result of an acquisition. These factors could contribute to us not achieving the expected benefits from our acquisitions within desired time frames, if at all.
Impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets could require charges to earnings, which could result in a negative impact on our results of operations.
     Under current accounting standards, goodwill and certain other intangible assets with indeterminate lives are no longer amortized but, instead, are assessed for impairment periodically or when impairment indicators are present. Assessment of goodwill and such other intangible assets could result in circumstances where the applicable intangible asset is deemed to be impaired for accounting purposes. Under such circumstances, the intangible asset’s impairment would be reflected as a charge to earnings in the period during which such impairment is identified.
We may be a defendant from time to time in the future in a variety of litigation and other actions, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.
     We and our subsidiaries may be involved from time to time in the future in a variety of litigation arising out of our business. Our insurance may not cover all claims that may be asserted against us, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any litigation exceed our insurance coverage, they could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation. In addition, we may not be able to obtain appropriate types or levels of insurance in the future, nor may we be able to obtain adequate replacement policies with acceptable terms, if at all.

-25-


Table of Contents

Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer information, whether through a breach of our computer systems or otherwise, could severely harm our business.
     As part of our financial institution business, we collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential client and customer information on behalf of our subsidiaries and other third parties. Despite the security measures we have in place, our facilities and systems, and those of our third party service providers, may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events. If information security is breached, information can be lost or misappropriated, resulting in financial loss or costs to us or damages to others. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information, whether by us or by our vendors, could severely damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business.
Terrorism, acts of war or international conflicts could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
     Acts or threats of war or terrorism, international conflicts, including ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the actions taken by the United States and other governments in response to such events could negatively impact general business and economic conditions in the United States. If terrorist activity, acts of war or other international hostilities cause an overall economic decline, our financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected. The potential for future terrorist attacks, the national and international responses to terrorist attacks or perceived threats to national security and other actual or potential conflicts or acts of war, including conflict in the Middle East, have created many economic and political uncertainties that could seriously harm our business and results of operations in ways that cannot presently be predicted.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
     None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
     Park’s principal executive offices are located at 50 North Third Street, Newark, Ohio 43055.
Park National Bank
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Park National Bank and its divisions have a total of 40 financial service offices. Park National Bank has six financial service offices (including its main office) and its operations center in Newark in Licking County. In addition, Park National Bank has: (a) financial service offices in Granville, Heath (two offices), Hebron, Johnstown, Kirkersville, Pataskala, Reynoldsburg and Utica in Licking County; (b) a financial service office in Delaware in Delaware County; (c) financial service offices in Canal Winchester, Columbus, Gahanna and Worthington in Franklin County; (d) a financial service office in West Chester in Butler County; (e) a financial service office in Dayton in Montgomery County; (f) financial service offices in Baltimore, Pickerington (two offices) and Lancaster (seven offices) in

-26-


Table of Contents

Fairfield County; (g) financial service offices in Amelia, Milford (two offices), New Richmond and Owensville in Clermont County; and (h) three financial service offices in Cincinnati in Hamilton County. The financial service offices in Canal Winchester and Fairfield County comprise the Fairfield National Division. The five offices in Clermont County and two of the offices in Cincinnati comprise the First Clermont Division. On December 16, 2005, Park announced that the First Clermont Division will be combined with the three Park National Bank financial service offices in southwest Ohio (the Cincinnati, Dayton and West Chester offices) and will operate as a new division under the Park National Bank name. The formation of this new division is expected to be completed during the first half of 2006.
     Of the financial service offices described above, 21 are leased and the remainder are owned. Park National Bank also operates 11 off-site automated teller machines, three of which are operated by the Fairfield National Division and two of which are operated by the First Clermont Division.
Richland Trust Company
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Richland Trust Company has a total of 13 financial service offices. Richland Trust Company has eight financial service offices in Mansfield (including its main office) as well as financial service offices in Butler, Lexington, Ontario and Shelby (two offices) in Richland County. Of these financial service offices, three are leased and the remainder are owned. Richland Trust Company also operates two off-site automated teller machines.
Century National Bank
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Century National Bank has a total of 16 financial service offices. Century National Bank has seven financial service offices (including its main office) and a mortgage lending office in Zanesville in Muskingum County. Century National Bank also has a financial service office in Athens in Athens County, two financial service offices in Coshocton in Coshocton County, a financial service office in Logan in Hocking County, financial service offices in New Concord and Dresden in Muskingum County, a financial service office in New Lexington in Perry County, and a financial service office in Newcomerstown in Tuscarawas County. Of these financial service offices, three are leased and the remainder are owned. Century National Bank also operates three off-site automated teller machines.
First-Knox National Bank
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, First-Knox National Bank and its divisions have a total of 14 financial service offices. First-Knox National Bank has three financial service offices (including its main office) and its operations center in Mount Vernon in Knox County. First-Knox National Bank also has financial service offices in Ashland, Loudonville and Perrysville in Ashland County, two financial service offices in Millersburg in Holmes County, financial service offices in Centerburg, Danville and Fredericktown in Knox County, two financial service offices in Mount Gilead in Morrow County and a financial service office in Bellville in Richland County. The financial service offices in Ashland County comprise the Farmers and Savings Division. Of these financial service offices, two are leased and the remainder are owned.

-27-


Table of Contents

First-Knox National Bank also operates 11 off-site automated teller machines, one of which is operated by the Farmers and Savings Division.
United Bank
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, United Bank has a total of eight financial service offices. United Bank has its main office in Bucyrus and financial service offices in Crestline and Galion in Crawford County and financial service offices in Caledonia, Marion (two offices), Prospect and Waldo in Marion County. Of these financial service offices, three are leased and the remainder are owned. United Bank also operates one off-site automated teller machine.
Second National Bank
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Second National Bank has a total of nine financial service offices. Second National Bank has five financial service offices (including its main office) in Greenville in Darke County. Second National Bank also has two financial service offices in Arcanum (two offices) and Versailles in Darke County and a financial service office in Fort Recovery in Mercer County. Of these financial service offices, two are leased and the remainder are owned.
Security National Bank
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Security National Bank and its divisions have a total of 22 financial service offices. Security National Bank has six financial service offices (including its main office) in Springfield in Clark County. Security National Bank also has financial service offices in Enon, Medway, New Carlisle (two offices) and South Charleston in Clark County, a financial service office in Jeffersonville in Fayette County, financial service offices in Jamestown (two offices) and Xenia (two offices) in Greene County, and financial service offices in Piqua (three offices including an administrative building), Tipp City and Troy (two offices) in Miami County. The financial service offices in Miami County comprise the Unity National Division. Of these financial service offices, three are leased and the remainder are owned. Security National Bank also operates four off-site automated teller machines.
Citizens National Bank
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Citizens National Bank has a total of five financial service offices. Citizens National Bank has two financial service offices (including its main office) in Urbana in Champaign County. In addition, Citizens National Bank has financial service offices in Mechanicsburg and North Lewisburg in Champaign County and a financial service office in Plain City in Madison County. All of Citizens National Bank’s financial service offices are owned. Citizens National Bank also operates two off-site automated teller machines.
Guardian Finance
     As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Guardian Finance has a total of eight financial service offices. Guardian Finance has its main office in Hilliard and a financial service office in Columbus in Franklin County, a financial service office in Springfield in Clark County, a financial service office in Delaware in Delaware County, a financial service office in Lancaster in

-28-


Table of Contents

Fairfield County where it leases space from the Fairfield National Division of Park National Bank, a financial service office in Heath in Licking County, a financial service office in Centerville in Montgomery County and a financial service office in Mansfield in Richland County where it leases space from Richland Trust Company. All of Guardian Finance’s financial service offices are leased.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
     There are no pending legal proceedings to which Park or any of its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject, except for routine legal proceedings to which Park’s subsidiary banks are parties incidental to their respective banking businesses. Park considers none of those proceedings to be material.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
     There were no matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders of Park during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
     The following table lists the names and ages of the executive officers of Park as of February 22, 2006, the positions presently held by those individuals with Park and its principal subsidiaries and their individual business experience during the past five years.
             
            Positions Held with Park and its
Name   Age   Principal Subsidiaries and Principal Occupation
 
C. Daniel DeLawder
    56     Chairman of the Board since January 1, 2005, Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 1999, President from 1994 until December 31, 2004, and a Director since 1994, of Park; Chairman of the Board since January 1, 2005, Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 1999, President from 1993 until December 31, 2004, Executive Vice President from 1992 to 1993, and a Director since 1992, of Park National Bank; Member of Advisory Board since 1985, Chairman of Advisory Board from 1989 to 2003, and President from 1985 to 1992, of the Fairfield National Division of Park National Bank; a Director of Richland Trust Company since 1997; a Director of Second National Bank since 2000

-29-


Table of Contents

             
            Positions Held with Park and its
Name   Age   Principal Subsidiaries and Principal Occupation
 
David L. Trautman
    44     President since January 1, 2005, Secretary since July 2002, and a Director since January 1, 2005, of Park; President since January 1, 2005, Executive Vice President from February 2002 until December 31, 2004, Vice President from July 1993 to June 1997, and a Director since February 2002, of Park National Bank; Chairman of the Board since March 2001, President and Chief Executive Officer from May 1997 to February 2002, and a Director since May 1997, of First-Knox National Bank; a Director of United Bank, N.A. since 2000
 
           
John W. Kozak
    50     Chief Financial Officer of Park since April 1998 (became an executive officer of Park on July 22, 2002); Senior Vice President since January 1999 and Chief Financial Officer since April 1998, and Vice President from 1991 to 1998, of Park National Bank; Chief Financial Officer from 1980 to 1991, and a Director since 1988, of Century National Bank
     The executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors of Park.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER                PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
     The information called for in this Item 5 by Items 201(a) through (c) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from “Table 15 — Market and Dividend Information” and the accompanying disclosure in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 36.
     The following table provides information regarding purchases of Park’s common shares made by or on behalf of Park or any “affiliated purchaser” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005:
                                 
                            Maximum  
                    Total Number of     Number of  
                    Common Shares     Common Shares  
                    Purchased as Part     that May Yet Be  
    Total Number of     Average Price Paid     of Publicly     Purchased under  
    Common Shares     per     Announced Plans or     the Plans or  
Period   Purchased     Common Share     Programs     Programs (1)  
 
October 1 thru October 31, 2005
    58,158     $ 104.68       58,158 (2)     1,561,430  
November 1 thru November 30, 2005
    6,899     $ 106.54       6,899 (3)     2,147,720  
December 1 thru December 31, 2005
    38,443     $ 107.21       38,443 (4)     2,111,833  
 
                       
Total
    103,500     $ 105.74       103,500       2,111,833  

-30-


Table of Contents

 
(1)   The number shown represents, as of the end of each period, the maximum aggregate number of common shares that may yet be purchased as part of Park’s publicly announced repurchase program to fund Park’s 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plan and Park’s 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan as well as Park’s publicly announced stock repurchase authorization then in effect.
 
    On November 18, 2002, Park announced that its Board of Directors had granted management the authority to purchase up to an aggregate of 500,000 common shares from time to time over the three-year period ending November 17, 2005. This stock repurchase authorization terminated on November 17, 2005. A total of 93,189 common shares were purchased under this stock repurchase authorization.
 
    On November 21, 2005, Park announced that its Board of Directors had granted management the authority to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,000,000 common shares from time to time over the three-year period ending November 20, 2008. A total of 38,443 common shares were purchased during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005 under this stock repurchase authorization. At December 31, 2005, 961,557 common shares remained authorized for repurchase under this stock repurchase authorization.
 
    The Park National Corporation 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors of Park on January 18, 2005 and was approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 18, 2005. Under the 2005 Plan, 1,500,000 common shares are authorized for delivery upon the exercise of incentive stock options granted under the 2005 Plan. All of the common shares delivered upon the exercise of incentive stock options granted under the 2005 Plan are to be treasury shares. As of December 31, 2005, incentive stock options covering 227,660 common shares were outstanding and 1,289,162 common shares were available for future grants.
 
    The Park National Corporation 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”) was approved by Park’s shareholders on April 17, 1995, and amended April 20, 1998 and April 16, 2001. Pursuant to the terms of the 1995 Plan, all of the common shares delivered upon exercise of incentive stock options granted under the 1995 Plan are to be treasury shares. No further incentive stock options may be granted under the 1995 Plan. As of December 31, 2005, incentive stock options covering 571,906 common shares were outstanding under the 1995 Plan.
 
    Incentive stock options, granted under both the 2005 Plan and the 1995 Plan, covering 799,566 common shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and 1,289,162 common shares were available for future grants under the 2005 Plan. With 938,452 common shares held as treasury shares for purposes of the 2005 Plan and 1995 Plan at December 31, 2005, an additional 1,150,276 common shares remain authorized for repurchase for purposes of funding the 2005 Plan and 1995 Plan.
 
(2)   Of the common shares reported, 29,003 common shares were purchased in the open market under Park’s publicly announced stock repurchase authorization then in effect and 29,155 common shares were repurchased for purposes of funding the 2005 Plan and 1995 Plan.

-31-


Table of Contents

(3)   Of the common shares reported, 3,449 common shares were purchased in the open market under Park’s publicly announced stock repurchase authorization then in effect and 3,450 common shares were repurchased for purposes of funding the 2005 Plan and 1995 Plan.
 
(4)   All of the common shares reported were purchased in the open market under Park’s publicly announced stock repurchase authorization then in effect.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
     The information called for in this Item 6 is incorporated herein by reference from “Table 13 — Consolidated Five-Year Selected Financial Data” and the accompanying disclosure in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 36.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION.
     The information called for in this Item 7 is incorporated herein by reference from the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on pages 26 through 36.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
     As noted in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption “Derivative Instruments” on page 48 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, Park and its subsidiaries did not use any derivative instruments in 2005, 2004 or 2003. The discussion of interest rate sensitivity included in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW — CAPITAL RESOURCES — Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity Management,” on pages 33 through 35, is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the discussion of Park’s commitments, contingent liabilities and off-balance sheet arrangements included on page 35 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders under the caption “FINANCIAL REVIEW — CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS — Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements,” and in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included on page 55 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
     The Consolidated Balance Sheets of Park and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, the related Consolidated Statements of Income, of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and of Cash Flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, the related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm appearing on pages 38 through 58 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, are incorporated herein by reference. Quarterly Financial Data provided in “Table 14 — Quarterly Financial Data” and the accompanying disclosure included in the section of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders captioned “FINANCIAL REVIEW,” on page 36, is also incorporated herein by reference.

-32-


Table of Contents

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
     No response required.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     With the participation of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer) and the Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer) of Park, Park’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of Park’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, Park’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Park’s Chief Financial Officer have concluded that:
    information required to be disclosed by Park in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other reports that Park files or submits under the Exchange Act would be accumulated and communicated to Park’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure;
 
    information required to be disclosed by Park in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other reports that Park files or submits under the Exchange Act would be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and
 
    Park’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K to ensure that material information relating to Park and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to them, particularly during the period for which the periodic reports of Park, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are being prepared.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     The “MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING” on page 37 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
     The “REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM” on page 38 of Park’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.

-33-


Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     There were no changes in Park’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during Park’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Park’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
     No response required.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
     The information required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K concerning: (a) directors of Park is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 17, 2006 (“Park’s 2006 Proxy Statement”), under the captions “PROPOSAL NUMBER 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” and “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD — Independence of Directors”; (b) the Audit Committee of Park’s Board of Directors and the Board of Directors’ determination that Park has an “audit committee financial expert” serving on its Audit Committee is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s 2006 Proxy Statement, under the caption “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD — Committees of the Board — Audit Committee”; and (c) the procedures by which shareholders of Park may recommend nominees to Park’s Board of Directors is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s 2006 Proxy Statement, under the caption “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD — Nominating Procedures”.
     The information concerning the executive officers of Park required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K is set forth in the portion of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K entitled “SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.”
     The information required by Item 405 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s 2006 Proxy Statement under the caption “PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS OF PARK — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”
     Park’s Board of Directors has adopted charters for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee.
     In accordance with the requirements of Section 807 of the AMEX Company Guide, the Board of Directors of Park has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covering the directors, officers and employees of Park and its affiliates, including Park’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer), Park’s President and Secretary and Park’s Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer). Park intends to disclose the following on the “Governance Documents (Corporate Governance)” section of the “Investor Relations” page of its website located at www.parknationalcorp.com within the required four business days following their occurrence: (A) the date and nature of any

-34-


Table of Contents

amendment to a provision of its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that (i) applies to Park’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, (ii) relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of SEC Regulation S-K, and (iii) is not a technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendment; and (B) a description of any waiver (including the nature of the waiver, the name of the person to whom the waiver was granted and the date of the waiver), including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics granted to Park’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions that relates to one or more of the elements of the code of ethics definition set forth in Item 406(b) of SEC Regulation S-K. In addition, Park will disclose any waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics granted to a director or an executive officer of Park in a current report on Form 8-K within four business days.
     The text of each of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Audit Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee Charter and the Nominating Committee Charter is posted on the “Governance Documents (Corporate Governance)” section of the “Investor Relations” page of Park’s website located at www.parknationalcorp.com. Interested persons may also obtain copies of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Audit Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee Charter and the Nominating Committee Charter, without charge, by writing to the President of Park at Park National Corporation, 50 North Third Street, P.O. Box 3500, Newark, Ohio 43058-3500, Attention: David L. Trautman. In addition, Park’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is filed as Exhibit 14 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
     The information called for in this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s 2006 Proxy Statement, under the captions “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD — Compensation of Directors”, “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION”, and “COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.” Such incorporation by reference shall not be deemed to specifically incorporate by reference the information referred to in Item 402(a)(8) of SEC Regulation S-K.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED                   STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
     The information called for in this Item 12 regarding the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s 2006 Proxy Statement, under the caption “PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS OF PARK.”
     The information called for in this Item 12 regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s 2006 Proxy Statement, under the caption “COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS — Equity Compensation Plan Information.”
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
     The information called for in this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s 2005 Proxy Statement, under the captions “PROPOSAL NUMBER 1: ELECTION OF

-35-


Table of Contents

DIRECTORS,” “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD — Independence of Directors,” “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION,” and “TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING MANAGEMENT.”
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
     The information called for in this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from Park’s 2006 Proxy Statement, under the captions “AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS — Pre-Approval of Services Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS — Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
     
(a)(1)
  Financial Statements.
 
 
For a list of all financial statements filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, see “Index to Financial Statements” at page 39.
 
(a)(2)
  Financial Statement Schedules.
 
 
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and have been omitted.
 
(a)(3)
  Exhibits.
 
 
Exhibits filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K are attached hereto or incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference. For a list of such exhibits, see the Index to Exhibits beginning at page E-1.
 
(b)
  Exhibits.
 
 
Exhibits filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K are attached hereto or incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference. For a list of such exhibits, see the Index to Exhibits beginning at page E-1.
 
(c)
  Financial Statement Schedules.
 
 
None

-36-


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
 
 
Date: March 9, 2006  By:        /s/ C. Daniel DeLawder    
    C. Daniel DeLawder,   
    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer   
 
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 9th day of March, 2006.
     
Name   Capacity
 
/s/ C. Daniel DeLawder
 
  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director 
C. Daniel DeLawder
   
 
   
/s/ David L. Trautman
 
  President, Secretary and Director
David L. Trautman
   
 
   
/s/ John W. Kozak
 
  Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
John W. Kozak
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
Maureen Buchwald
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
James J. Cullers
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
Harry O. Egger
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
F. William Englefield IV
   

-37-


Table of Contents

     
Name   Capacity
 
*
 
  Director
William T. McConnell
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
Michael J. Menzer
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
John J. O’Neill
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
William A. Phillips
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
J. Gilbert Reese
   
 
   
*
 
  Director
Rick R. Taylor
   
 
   
*
 
Leon Zazworsky                 
  Director
 
*   By C. Daniel DeLawder pursuant to Powers of Attorney executed by the directors listed above, which Powers of Attorney have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
     
/s/ C. Daniel DeLawder
 
   
C. Daniel DeLawder
   
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
   

-38-


Table of Contents

PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
         
    Page(s) in  
    2005 Annual  
    Report to  
Description   Shareholders  
 
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)
    38-39  
 
       
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2005 and 2004
    40-41  
 
       
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
    42-43  
 
       
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
    44  
 
       
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
    45  
 
       
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    46-58  

-39-


Table of Contents

PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
     
Exhibit No.   Description of Exhibit
 
3.1
  Articles of Incorporation of Park National Corporation (“Park”) as filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on March 24, 1992 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to Park’s Form 8-B, filed on May 20, 1992 (File No. 0-18772) (“Park’s Form 8-B”))
 
   
3.2
  Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Park as filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on May 6, 1993 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to Park’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 (File No. 0-18772))
 
   
3.3
  Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Park as filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on April 16, 1996 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to Park’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1996 (File No. 1-13006))
 
   
3.4
  Certificate of Amendment by Shareholders to the Articles of Incorporation of Park as filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on April 22, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a)(1) to Park’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997 (File No. 1-13006)(“Park’s June 1997 Form 10-Q”))
 
   
3.5
  Articles of Incorporation of Park (reflecting amendments through April 22, 1997) [for SEC reporting compliance purposes only — not filed with Ohio Secretary of State] (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a)(2) to Park’s June 1997 Form 10-Q)
 
   
3.6
  Regulations of Park (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to Park’s Form 8-B)
 
   
3.7
  Certified Resolution regarding adoption of amendment to Subsection 2.02(A) of the Regulations of Park by Shareholders on April 21, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b)(1) to Park’s June 1997 Form 10-Q)
 
   
3.8
  Regulations of Park (reflecting amendments through April 21, 1997) [for SEC reporting compliance purposes only] (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b)(2) to Park’s June 1997 Form 10-Q)
 
   
4
  Agreement to furnish instruments defining rights of holders of long-term debt **

E-1


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit No.   Description of Exhibit
 
*10.1
  Summary of Base Salaries for Executive Officers of Park National Corporation **
 
   
*10.2
  Summary of Incentive Compensation Plan of Park National Corporation **
 
   
*10.3
  Split-Dollar Agreement, dated May 17, 1993, between William T. McConnell and The Park National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to Park’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 (File No. 0-18772)); and Schedule A to Exhibit 10.3 identifying other identical Split-Dollar Agreements between subsidiaries of Park and executive officers or employees of such subsidiaries who are directors or executive officers of Park (incorporated herein by reference to Schedule A to Exhibit 10.3 to Park’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 1-13006) (“Park’s 2004 Form 10-K”))
 
   
*10.4
  Split-Dollar Agreement, dated September 3, 1993, between Leon Zazworsky and The Park National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Park’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 1-13006) (“Park’s 2003 Form 10-K”)); and Schedule A to Exhibit 10.4 identifying other identical Split-Dollar Agreements between directors of Park and The Park National Bank, The Richland Trust Company, Century National Bank or The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon as identified in such Schedule A **
 
   
*10.5
  Park National Corporation 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan (reflects amendments and share dividends through December 15, 2004) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Park’s 2004 Form 10-K)
 
   
*10.6
  Form of Stock Option Agreement executed in connection with the grant of options under the Park National Corporation 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to Park’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-13006))
 
   
*10.7
  Description of Park National Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan **
 
   
*10.8
  Security Banc Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan, which was assumed by Park (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Park’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 23, 2001 (Registration No. 333-59378))
 
   
*10.9
  Security Banc Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan, which was assumed by Park (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to Park’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 23, 2001 (Registration No. 333-59378))

E-2


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit No.   Description of Exhibit
 
*10.10
  Security Banc Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan, which was assumed by Park (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to Park’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 23, 2001 (Registration No. 333-59378))
 
   
*10.11
  Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of December 22, 1999, and the Amendment thereto, dated March 23, 2001, between The Security National Bank and Trust Co. (also known as Security National Bank and Trust Co.) and Harry O. Egger (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to Park’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001 (File No. 1-13006))
 
   
*10.12
  First-Knox Banc Corp. 1990 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, which was assumed by Park (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to Exhibit 23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989 of First-Knox Banc Corp. (File No. 0-13161))
 
   
*10.13
  Resolution Regarding Amendment to First-Knox Banc Corp. 1990 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan on May 14, 1996, which was assumed by Park (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 of First-Knox Banc Corp. (File No. 0-13161))
 
   
*10.14
  Park National Corporation Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to Park’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 1-13006))
 
   
*10.15
  Summary of Certain Compensation for Directors of Park National Corporation **
 
   
*10.16
  Security National Bank and Trust Co. Amended and Restated 1988 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Park’s 2004 Form 10-K)
 
   
*10.17
  Park National Corporation 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Park’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 20, 2005 (File No. 1-13006))
 
   
*10.18
  Form of Stock Option Agreement to be used in connection with the grant of incentive stock options under the Park National Corporation 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Park’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 20, 2005 (File No. 1-13006))
 
   
13
  2005 Annual Report to Shareholders (not deemed filed except for portions thereof which are specifically incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K)**

E-3


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit No.   Description of Exhibit
 
14
  Code of Business Conduct and Ethics **
 
   
21
  Subsidiaries of Park National Corporation**
 
   
23
  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP **
 
   
24
  Powers of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers of Park **
 
   
31.1
  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification — Principal Executive Officer**
 
   
31.2
  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification — Principal Financial Officer**
 
   
32
  Section 1350 Certification — Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
 
*   Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
 
**   Filed herewith

E-4

EX-4 2 l18755aexv4.txt EX-4 EXHIBIT 4 [Park National Corporation Letterhead] March 9, 2006 Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Park National Corporation - Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 Ladies and Gentlemen: Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation ("Park"), is today filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-K"). Pursuant to the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Park hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Park's consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. The long-term debt evidenced by such instruments and agreements does not exceed 10% of the total assets of Park and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Very truly yours, PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION /s/ John W. Kozak John W. Kozak Chief Financial Officer EX-10.1 3 l18755aexv10w1.txt EX-10.1 EXHIBIT 10.1 SUMMARY OF BASE SALARIES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION On January 18, 2005, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors of Park National Corporation ("Park") approved the base salaries for each of the executive officers of Park: (a) C. Daniel DeLawder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Park and The Park National Bank, a subsidiary of Park; (b) David L. Trautman, President and Secretary of Park and President of The Park National Bank; and (c) John W. Kozak, Chief Financial Officer of Park and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Park National Bank, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "2005 fiscal year"). The Compensation Committee also recommended that the cash compensation paid to these three executive officers during the 2005 fiscal year be split at 50% base salary and 50% incentive compensation. Messrs. DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak historically had received the majority of their total cash compensation in incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee reviewed independently generated peer group information of similarly sized bank holding companies developed by SNL Securities which revealed that the individuals holding these positions typically receive a majority of their cash compensation in base salary. To be more consistent with peers, and at the suggestion of the management of Park and The Park National Bank, the Compensation Committee considered and then approved a 50/50 split between base salary and cash incentive compensation. Management also suggested that Messrs. DeLawder and Trautman receive no increase in the aggregate amount of cash compensation paid during the 2005 fiscal year, but that the proportion of total cash compensation allocated to base salary and incentive compensation for the 2005 fiscal year should change. Management suggested, and the Compensation Committee concurred after reviewing peer data, to increase Mr. Kozak's total cash compensation. Accordingly, the base salaries for the 2005 fiscal year were $464,240 for Mr. DeLawder, $307,108 for Mr. Trautman and $200,500 for Mr. Kozak. On February 7, 2006, the Compensation Committee approved the base salaries for each of Messrs. DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 (the "2006 fiscal year"). Management suggested that Messrs. DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak receive the same base salary for the 2006 fiscal year as they had received in 2005 and the Compensation Committee concurred after reviewing independently generated peer group information of similarly sized bank holding companies developed by SNL Securities. EX-10.2 4 l18755aexv10w2.txt EX-10.2 EXHIBIT 10.2 SUMMARY OF INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Park National Corporation ("Park") administers Park's incentive compensation plan which enables the officers of The Park National Bank (the Park National Division, the Fairfield National Division, the Consolidated Computer Center Division and the First Clermont Division), The Richland Trust Company, Century National Bank, The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon (the First-Knox National Division and the Farmers and Savings Division), Second National Bank, United Bank, N.A., The Security National Bank and Trust Co. (the Security National Division and the Unity National Division), The Citizens National Bank of Urbana, Scope Leasing, Inc. and Guardian Financial Services Company (collectively, "Park's Principal Subsidiaries") to share in any above-average return on equity (net income divided by average equity) which Park and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis may generate during a fiscal year. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "2005 fiscal year"), all officers of Park's Principal Subsidiaries, including C. Daniel DeLawder (who served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Park and Park National Bank during the 2005 fiscal year and continues to so serve), David L. Trautman (who served as President and Secretary of Park and as President of Park National Bank during the 2005 fiscal year and continues to so serve), and John W. Kozak (who served as Chief Financial Officer of Park and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Park National Bank during the 2005 fiscal year and continues to so serve) were eligible to participate in the incentive compensation plan. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 (the "2006 fiscal year"), all officers of Park's Principal Subsidiaries (including Messrs. DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak) will also be eligible to participate. Above-average return on equity is defined as the amount by which the net income to average equity ratio of Park and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis exceeds the median net income to average equity ratio of all U.S. bank holding companies of similar asset size ($3 billion to $10 billion). A formula determines the amount, if any, by which Park's return on equity ratio exceeds the median return on equity ratio of these peer bank holding companies. Twenty percent (20%) of that amount on a before-tax equivalent basis is available for incentive compensation. If Park's return on equity ratio is equal to or less than that of the peer group, no incentive compensation will be available with respect to that year. The Chief Executive Officer and the President of Park and Park National Bank have historically received a fixed percentage of the amount available for incentive compensation as determined by the Board of Directors and, more recently, the Compensation Committee. Mr. DeLawder and Mr. Trautman recommended to the Compensation Committee that, because of the modest increase in net income earned by Park for the 2005 fiscal year, their total cash compensation to be paid during the 2006 fiscal year remain unchanged, and that the ratio of base salary and incentive compensation to be paid during the 2006 fiscal year remain at 50/50. After reviewing the independently generated peer group information of similarly sized bank holding companies developed by SNL Securities, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Kozak's total cash compensation to be paid during the 2006 fiscal year should be increased to $420,500. As a result, Mr. Kozak's incentive compensation in respect of the 2005 fiscal year was $220,000. Mr. DeLawder's incentive compensation and Mr. Trautman's incentive compensation in respect of the 2005 fiscal year were $464,240 and $307,108, respectively. After deducting the incentive compensation paid to Messrs. DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak, the remaining amount available for incentive compensation pay was distributed to the officers of Park's Principal Subsidiaries on the basis of their respective contributions to Park's meeting its short-term and long-term financial goals during the 2005 fiscal year, which contributions were subjectively determined by the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and the President and Secretary of Park and approved by Park's Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee. Recommendations of the presidents of Park's Principal Subsidiaries were considered when determining incentive compensation amounts for officers (other than the internal audit staff) of those subsidiaries. The incentive compensation paid to the internal audit staff of Park's Principal Subsidiaries is determined by the Audit Committee of Park's Board of Directors. The payment of the incentive compensation amounts for the 2005 fiscal year was made during the first quarter of the 2006 fiscal year (in February of 2006). -2- EX-10.4 5 l18755aexv10w4.txt EX-10.4 SCHEDULE A TO EXHIBIT 10.4 The following directors of Park National Corporation ("Park") entered into Split-Dollar Agreements with the subsidiaries of Park identified below which are identical to the Split-Dollar Agreement, dated September 3, 1993, between Leon Zazworsky and The Park National Bank ("Park National Bank") filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Park's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 1-13006):
Subsidiary of Park which is a Party to Date of Split-Dollar Name of Director Split-Dollar Agreement Agreement - ------------------------- -------------------------------------------- -------------------- Maureen Buchwald The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon May 22, 1998 ("First-Knox National Bank") James J. Cullers First-Knox National Bank May 22, 1998 F. William Englefield IV Park National Bank September 2, 1993 Michael J. Menzer Park National Bank April 28, 1999 John J. O'Neill Park National Bank September 2, 1993 J. Gilbert Reese Park National Bank September 8, 1993 Rick R. Taylor The Richland Trust Company September 29, 1993
EX-10.7 6 l18755aexv10w7.txt EX-10.7 EXHIBIT 10.7 DESCRIPTION OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN Park National Corporation ("Park") adopted the Park National Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan or "SERP" in December 1996. The SERP currently benefits 31 current and former officers of Park and its subsidiaries, including: (a) William T. McConnell, who serves as Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of each of Park and The Park National Bank, a subsidiary of Park ("PNB"); (b) C. Daniel DeLawder, who serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of each of Park and PNB; and (c) John W. Kozak, who serves as Chief Financial Officer of Park and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PNB. David L. Trautman, who serves as President and Secretary of Park and as President of PNB, does not participate in the SERP. The SERP is a non-qualified benefit plan designed to restore benefits lost due to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, on the amount of compensation covered by and the benefits payable under a defined benefit plan such as the Park National Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Park has purchased life insurance contracts to fund the SERP. The SERP is designed to provide a monthly retirement benefit of approximately $5,000, $10,500 and $500 for Messrs. McConnell, DeLawder and Kozak, respectively. These additional benefits are not guaranteed and are dependent upon the earnings from the related life insurance contracts compared to the average yield on three-month Treasury bills. The SERP also provides a life insurance benefit to a current or former officer of Park or one of its subsidiaries participating in the SERP who dies before age 86. The amount of this life insurance benefit will be equal to the present value of the stream of future benefits which would have been paid to the individual until age 86 but had not been paid at the time of the individual's death. EX-10.15 7 l18755aexv10w15.txt EX-10.15 EXHIBIT 10.15 SUMMARY OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION ANNUAL RETAINER AND MEETING FEES Each director of Park National Corporation ("Park") who is not an employee of Park or one of Park's subsidiaries (a "non-employee director") receives, on the date of the regular meeting of the Park Board of Directors held during the fourth fiscal quarter, an annual retainer in the form of 120 common shares awarded under the Park National Corporation Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Directors' Stock Plan"). During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "2005 fiscal year"), each non-employee director also received $750 for each meeting of the Board of Directors of Park attended and $300 for each meeting of a committee of the Board of Directors attended. At the January 17, 2006 meeting of the Board of Directors, the Board approved an increase in the cash compensation to be paid to directors. Effective on and after January 18, 2006, each non-employee director will receive $1,000 for each meeting of the Park Board of Directors attended and $400 for each meeting of a committee of the Park Board of Directors attended. If the date of a meeting of the full Board of Directors is changed from that provided for by resolution of the Board and a non-employee director is not able to attend the rescheduled meeting, he or she receives the meeting fee as though he or she attended the meeting. In addition, each member of the Executive Committee of the Park Board of Directors will receive a $2,500 annual cash retainer and each member of the Audit Committee of the Park Board of Directors (other than the Chair) will receive a $2,000 annual cash retainer. The Chair of the Audit Committee will receive a $5,000 annual cash retainer. Each non-employee director of Park also serves on the board of directors of one of Park's subsidiary banks and receives, on the date of the regular meeting of the Park Board of Directors held during the fourth fiscal quarter, an annual retainer in the form of 60 common shares of Park awarded under the Directors' Stock Plan and, in some cases, a specified amount of cash for such service as well as fees for attendance at meetings of the board of directors of the appropriate Park subsidiary bank (and committees of that board). C. Daniel DeLawder, William T. McConnell, William A. Phillips and David L. Trautman receive no compensation for serving as members of the Board of Directors of Park or of any subsidiary of Park. OTHER COMPENSATION William T. McConnell is employed by The Park National Bank, a subsidiary of Park, in a non-executive officer capacity. In such capacity, he received the amount of $33,000 during the 2005 fiscal year. William A. Phillips is employed by Century National Bank, a subsidiary of Park, in a non-executive officer capacity. In such capacity, he also received the amount of $33,000 during the 2005 fiscal year. EX-13 8 l18755aexv13.txt EX-13 EXHIBIT 13 FINANCIAL REVIEW This financial review presents management's discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations for Park National Corporation ("Park" or the "Corporation"). This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and the five-year summary of selected financial data. Management's discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that are provided to assist in the understanding of anticipated future financial performance. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. The forward-looking statements are based on management's expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially include, without limitation, Park's ability to execute its business plan, changes in general economic and financial market conditions, changes in interest rates, changes in the competitive environment, changes in banking regulations or other regulatory or legislative requirements affecting bank holding companies and changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other regulatory agencies. Undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Park does not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement except to the extent required by law. Park's Board of Directors approved a 5% stock dividend in November 2004. The additional common shares resulting from the dividend were distributed on December 15, 2004, to stockholders of record as of December 1, 2004. The consolidated financial statements, notes and other references to share and per share data have been retroactively restated for the stock dividend. OVERVIEW Net income for 2005 increased by $3.7 million to $95.2 million, a 4.1% increase over net income of $91.5 million for 2004. Diluted earnings per share increased by 5.1% to $6.64 for 2005 compared to $6.32 for 2004. For 2005 compared to 2004, income before federal income taxes benefited from an $8.3 million increase in net interest income, a $3.2 million decrease in the provision for loan losses and a $7.9 million increase in total other income. Total operating expenses increased by $13.1 million and federal income tax expense increased by $2.4 million in 2005 compared to 2004. The primary reason for the increases in net interest income, total other income and operating expense was the acquisitions of First Federal Bancorp, Inc. ("First Federal") on December 31, 2004 and First Clermont Bank ("First Clermont") on January 3, 2005. First Federal had $253 million of assets at the time of its acquisition and First Clermont had $185 million of assets on January 3, 2005. Both acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and did not have any impact on the 2004 operating results for Park. Net income for 2004 increased by $4.6 million to $91.5 million, a 5.3% increase over net income of $86.9 million for 2003. Diluted earnings per share increased by 5.9% to $6.32 for 2004 compared to $5.97 for 2003. For 2004 compared to 2003, income before federal income taxes benefited from a $9.7 million increase in net interest income and a $4.0 million reduction in the provision for loan losses. Total other income decreased by $3.7 million, total operating expenses increased by $3.9 million and federal income tax expense increased by $1.4 million in 2004 compared to 2003. The primary reason for the increase in net income in 2004 was the $9.7 million or 4.8% increase in net interest income. Average loan balances were $2,813 million in 2004 compared to $2,696 million in 2003. The reduction in the provision for loan losses contributed to the increases in net income for both 2005 and 2004. The provision for loan losses was $5.4 million in 2005, $8.6 million in 2004 and $12.6 million in 2003. The reduction in the provision for loan losses was primarily due to a reduction in net loan charge-offs, which were $5.9 million in 2005, $7.9 million in 2004 and $11.5 million in 2003. The annualized net income to average assets ratio (ROA) was 1.71% for 2005 and 1.81% for both 2004 and 2003. The annualized net income to average equity ratio (ROE) was 17.03% for 2005, 17.00% for 2004 and 16.69% for 2003. Effective the fourth quarter of 2005, the quarterly cash dividend on common stock was increased to $.92 per share. The new annualized cash dividend of $3.68 per share is 2.2% greater than the sum of the cash dividends declared for the four previous quarters. Park has paid quarterly cash dividends since becoming a holding company in early 1987. The annual compound growth rate for Park's dividend declared per share for the last five years is 7.4%. The dividend pay out ratio was 54.19% for 2005, 53.54% for 2004 and 53.42% for 2003. ACQUISITIONS AND BRANCH SALE On January 3, 2005, Park acquired First Clermont Bank of Milford, Ohio for $52.5 million in an all cash transaction. First Clermont Bank merged with The Park National Bank (a Park subsidiary bank) and has been operating as a separate division of The Park National Bank (under the First Clermont name). The fair value of the acquired assets of First Clermont was $185.4 million and the fair value of the liabilities assumed was $161.3 million at January 3, 2005. The goodwill recognized as a result of this acquisition was $28.4 million. Park announced during the fourth quarter of 2005 that The Park National Bank's three offices in southwest Ohio will be combined with the First Clermont Division during the first six months of 2006. On December 31, 2004, Park acquired First Federal Bancorp, Inc. for $46.6 million in an all cash transaction accounted for as a purchase. The savings and loan subsidiary of First Federal, First Federal Savings Bank of Eastern Ohio, merged with Park's subsidiary bank, Century National Bank. The goodwill recognized as a result of this acquisition was $26.7 million. The fair value of the acquired assets of First Federal was $252.6 million and the fair value of the liabilities assumed was $232.7 million at December 31, 2004. On February 11, 2005, Century National Bank sold its Roseville, Ohio branch office. The Roseville branch office was acquired in connection with the acquisition of First Federal on December 31, 2004. The Federal Reserve Board required that the Roseville branch office be sold as a condition of its approval of the merger transactions involving Park and First Federal. The deposits sold with the Roseville branch office totaled $12.4 million and the loans sold with the branch office totaled $5.3 million. Century National Bank received a premium of $1.2 million from the sale of deposits which reduced goodwill by $860,000 and core deposit intangibles by $324,000. The two acquisitions were funded through the working capital of Park and its subsidiary banks. A year ago, management projected that the two acquisitions would add approximately $3 to $4 million to net income in 2005. Management estimates that the acquisitions added approximately $4.5 million to net income in 2005, net of the implied interest cost on the combined purchase prices of $99.1 million. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The significant accounting policies used in the development and presentation of Park's financial statements are listed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The accounting and reporting policies of Park conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Park considers that the determination of the allowance for loan losses involves a higher degree of judgment and complexity than its other significant accounting policies. The allowance for loan losses is calculated with the objective of maintaining a reserve level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb probable credit losses in the loan portfolio. Management's determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on periodic evaluations 26 FINANCIAL REVIEW of the loan portfolio and of current economic conditions. However, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including expected default probabilities, loss given default, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, and estimated losses on consumer loans and residential mortgage loans based on historical loss experience and the current economic conditions. All of those factors may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent that actual results differ from management estimates, additional loan loss provisions may be required that would adversely impact earnings for future periods. Management's assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses considers individual impaired loans, pools of homogeneous loans with similar risk characteristics and other environmental risk factors. This assessment is updated on a quarterly basis. The allowance established for individual impaired loans reflects expected losses resulting from analyses developed through specific credit allocations for individual loans. The specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of commercial, commercial real estate and construction loans where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification. These analyses involve a high degree of judgement in estimating the amount of loss associated with specific impaired loans. Pools of homogeneous loans with similar risk characteristics are also assessed for probable losses. A loss migration analysis is performed on commercial, commercial real estate loans and construction loans. These loans over a fixed dollar amount are assigned an internal credit rating. Generally, residential real estate loans and consumer loans are not individually graded. The amount of loan loss reserve assigned to these loans is dependent on their net charge-off history. Management also evaluates the impact of environmental factors which pose additional risks. Such environmental factors include: national and local economic trends and conditions; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff; effects of any changes in lending policies and procedures; levels of, and trends in, consumer bankruptcies, delinquencies, impaired loans and charge-offs and recoveries. The determination of this component of the allowance for loan losses requires considerable management judgement. Management believes that the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets also involves a higher degree of judgement than most other significant accounting policies. Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, "Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," establishes standards for the amortization of acquired intangible assets and impairment assessment of goodwill. At December 31, 2005, Park had core deposit intangibles of $7.5 million subject to amortization and $61.7 million of goodwill, which was not subject to periodic amortization. Goodwill arising from business combinations represents the value attributable to unidentifiable intangible assets in the business acquired. Park's goodwill relates to the value inherent in the banking industry and that value is dependent upon the ability of Park's banking subsidiaries to provide quality, cost effective banking services in a competitive marketplace. The goodwill value of $61.7 million is supported by revenue that is in part driven by the volume of business transacted. A decrease in earnings resulting from a decline in the customer base or the inability to deliver cost effective services over sustained periods can lead to impairment of goodwill that could adversely impact earnings in future periods. SFAS No. 142 requires an annual evaluation of goodwill for impairment. The fair value of the goodwill, which resides on the books of Park's subsidiary banks, is estimated by reviewing the past and projected operating results for the Park subsidiary banks, deposit and loan totals for the Park subsidiary banks and banking industry comparable information. Park has concluded in each of the past three years that the recorded value of goodwill was not impaired. ABOUT OUR BUSINESS Through its banking subsidiaries, Park is engaged in the commercial banking and trust business, generally in small to medium population Ohio communities. Management believes there is a significant number of consumers and businesses which seek long-term relationships with community-based financial institutions of quality and strength. While not engaging in activities such as foreign lending, nationally syndicated loans and investment banking operations, Park attempts to meet the needs of its customers for commercial, real estate and consumer loans, consumer and commercial leases, and investment, fiduciary and deposit services. Familiarity with its local markets has allowed Park to achieve solid financial results even in periods when there have been weak economic conditions. A subsidiary bank of Park, The Park National Bank, has concentrated on further expanding its operations in three metropolitan areas in Ohio during the past year. The metropolitan areas are Columbus, Cincinnati and Dayton. The Park National Bank opened an office in Worthington (near Columbus), opened an office in West Chester (near Cincinnati) and relocated its downtown Dayton office to the Dayton suburb of Centerville during 2005. Additional lenders were added to further increase loans in these markets. The small to medium population Ohio communities, where most of Park's subsidiary banks are headquartered, have experienced slow economic growth in the past few years. Management expects to continue to concentrate on adding banking offices in higher growth markets in the next two years. Management anticipates that some of this expansion will be to metropolitan areas outside the state of Ohio. The Corporation's subsidiaries compete for deposits and loans with other banks, savings associations, credit unions and other types of financial institutions. At December 31, 2005, Park and its subsidiaries operated one hundred twenty-six full service offices and a network of one hundred thirty-seven automatic teller machines in twenty-nine Ohio counties. The acquisition of First Clermont Bank added seven additional full service offices. Park has produced performance ratios which compare favorably to peer bank holding companies in terms of equity and asset returns, capital adequacy and asset quality. Continued strong results are contingent upon economic conditions in Ohio and competitive factors, among other things. A table of financial data of Park's subsidiaries for 2005, 2004 and 2003 is shown below. See Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional financial information on the Corporation's subsidiaries. TABLE 1 - PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION AFFILIATE FINANCIAL DATA
2005 2004 2003 -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- AVERAGE NET Average Net Average Net ASSETS INCOME Assets Income Assets Income ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Park National Bank: Park National Division $1,413,872 $23,026 $1,380,568 $21,569 $1,330,713 $22,460 Fairfield National Division 362,192 6,856 335,006 7,309 333,095 5,965 First Clermont Division 229,726 3,049 -- -- -- -- Richland Trust Company 515,749 8,842 546,710 9,753 509,609 9,748 Century National Bank 743,276 12,464 503,239 8,065 458,440 7,629 First-Knox National Bank: First-Knox National Division 639,000 10,805 665,116 11,049 649,851 11,242 Farmers & Savings Division 126,939 2,544 79,442 2,799 82,019 2,386 United Bank, N.A. 241,277 3,026 240,988 3,523 226,741 3,467 Second National Bank 404,656 6,029 390,906 6,859 372,152 6,201 Security National Bank: Security National Division 782,467 11,393 773,710 12,290 719,043 11,091 Unity National Division 184,234 1,404 170,829 1,159 164,535 1,275 Citizens National Bank 189,965 1,928 201,916 2,332 188,446 2,261 Parent Company, including consolidating entries (275,265) 3,872 (239,349) 4,800 (231,381) 3,153 ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- CONSOLIDATED TOTALS $5,558,088 $95,238 $5,049,081 $91,507 $4,803,263 $86,878 ========== ======= ========== ======= ========== =======
27 FINANCIAL REVIEW RETURN ON EQUITY Park's primary financial goal is to achieve a superior long-term return on stockholders' equity. The Corporation measures performance in its attempt to achieve this goal against its peers, defined as all U.S. bank holding companies between $3 billion and $10 billion in assets. At year-end 2005, there were approximately 89 bank holding companies in this peer group. The Corporation's net income to average equity ratio (ROE) was 17.03%, 17.00% and 16.69% in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The return on equity ratio has averaged 17.12% over the past five years compared to 13.55% for the peer group. HISTORICAL COMPARISON OF RETURN ON AVERAGE EQUITY
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Park 17.33% 17.56% 16.69% 17.00% 17.03% Peer Mean 13.39% 14.46% 13.54% 13.16% 13.18%*
* as of 09/30/2005 BALANCE SHEET COMPOSITION Park functions as a commercial bank holding company. The following section discusses the balance sheet for the Corporation. SOURCE OF FUNDS DEPOSITS: Park's major source of funds is provided by core deposits from individuals, businesses and local government units. These core deposits consist of all noninterest bearing and interest bearing deposits, excluding certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over. These larger balance certificates of deposit were less than 13% of total deposits for each of the last three years. In 2005, year-end total deposits decreased by $55 million or 1.5% exclusive of the $136 million of deposits that were acquired in the First Clermont acquisition and the $12 million of deposits that were included in the sale of the Roseville branch office. In 2004, year-end total deposits increased by $103 million or 3.0% exclusive of the $172 million of deposits that were acquired in the First Federal acquisition. Average total deposits were $3,830 million in 2005 compared to $3,521 million in 2004 and $3,424 million in 2003. Average noninterest bearing deposits were $643 million in 2005 compared to $575 million in 2004 and $522 million in 2003. Management expects that average total deposits will increase by a modest amount (1% to 2%) in 2006. Emphasis will continue to be placed on increasing noninterest bearing deposits. A year ago, management projected that average total deposits would increase by approximately 2.5% in 2005. The growth in average total deposits in 2005 was $13 million or only .4% exclusive of the acquisitions of First Federal and First Clermont and the sale of the Roseville branch office. The slower than expected growth was primarily due to increased competition for interest bearing balances. Management concentrated on controlling the cost of interest bearing deposit accounts in 2005. The average interest rate paid on interest bearing deposit accounts was 1.79% in 2005 compared to 1.36% in 2004 and 1.67% in 2003. By comparison, the average federal funds rate was 3.21% in 2005, 1.36% in 2004 and 1.13% in 2003. Maturity of time certificates of deposit and other time deposits of $100,000 and over as of December 31, 2005 were: TABLE 2 - $100,000 AND OVER MATURITY SCHEDULE
TIME CERTIFICATES DECEMBER 31, 2005 OF DEPOSIT - ----------------- ----------------- (IN THOUSANDS) 3 months or less $114,078 Over 3 months through 6 months 77,892 Over 6 months through 12 months 115,396 Over 12 months 110,487 -------- TOTAL $417,853 --------
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS: Short-term borrowings consist of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, federal funds purchased and other borrowings. These funds are used to manage the Corporation's liquidity needs and interest rate sensitivity risk. The average rate paid on short-term borrowings generally moves closely with changes in market interest rates for short-term investments. The average rate paid on short-term borrowings was 2.57% in 2005 compared to 1.33% in 2004 and .53% in 2003. The Federal Reserve Board has increased the federal funds rate by 25 basis points at each Federal Open Market Committee meeting since June 2004. The federal funds rate increased from 1.00% to 2.25% at year-end 2004 and further increased to 4.25% by year-end 2005. The average federal funds rate was 1.13% in 2003, 1.36% in 2004 and 3.21% in 2005. The average rate paid on short-term borrowings was .53% in 2003 compared to the average federal funds rate of 1.13% for the year. The primary reason for the unusually low borrowing rate in 2003 was due to dollar-roll repo borrowings, which averaged $264 million for the year at an average borrowing rate of a negative .03%. The dollar-roll repo borrowings were secured by U.S. Government Agency fifteen-year mortgage-backed securities. This very attractive borrowing rate was due to a shortage of 5.00% fifteen-year mortgage-backed securities during the first half of 2003. This attractive borrowing rate was not available in 2004 and 2005. The proceeds from the dollar-roll repo borrowings were used to purchase short-term U.S. Government Agency securities which on average yielded 1.15%. This arbitrage generated $3.1 million in net interest income for 2003. The average borrowing rate for short-term borrowings, excluding the dollar-roll repos, was 1.12% for 2003. LONG-TERM DEBT: Long-term debt primarily consists of borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and repurchase agreements with investment banking firms. The average rate paid on long-term debt was 3.69% for 2005 compared to 2.57% for 2004 and 3.78% for 2003. In 2005, average long-term debt was $800 million compared to $520 million in 2004 and $282 million in 2003. Average total debt (long-term and short-term) was $1,092 million in 2005 compared to $921 million in 2004 and $797 million in 2003. Average long-term debt was 73% of average total debt in 2005 compared to 56% in 2004 and 35% in 2003. Management increased the amount of long-term debt over the past two years due to the increase in short-term interest rates. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: Average stockholders' equity to average total assets was 10.06% in 2005, 10.66% in 2004 and 10.83% in 2003. The decrease in the average stockholders' equity to average total assets ratio in 2005 was primarily due to the acquisitions of First Federal and First Clermont which added assets totaling $438 million but no equity since both acquisitions were all cash transactions. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, Park reflects any unrealized holding gain or loss on available-for-sale securities, net of federal taxes, as accumulated other comprehensive income which is part of Park's equity. While the effects of this accounting are not recognized for calculation of regulatory capital adequacy ratios, it does impact Park's equity as reported in the audited financial statements. The unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities, net of federal taxes, was $10.1 million at year-end 2005. The 28 FINANCIAL REVIEW unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of federal taxes, was $12.4 million at year-end 2004 and $19.0 million at year-end 2003. Long-term interest rates increased during 2005 which caused the market value of Park's investment securities to decline and produced the unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities. INVESTMENT OF FUNDS LOANS: Average loans, net of unearned income, were $3,278 million in 2005 compared to $2,813 million in 2004 and $2,696 million in 2003. The average yield on loans was 6.84% in 2005 compared to 6.38% in 2004 and 6.85% in 2003. The average prime lending rate in 2005 was 6.19% compared to 4.35% in 2004 and 4.12% in 2003. Approximately 64% of loan balances mature or reprice within one year (see Table 11). This results in the interest rate yield on the loan portfolio adjusting with changes in interest rates, but on a delayed basis. Management expects that the yield on the loan portfolio will increase in 2006 as variable rate loans reprice at higher interest rates. Year-end loan balances, net of unearned income, increased by $52 million or 1.7% in 2005 exclusive of $161 million of loans that were acquired in the First Clermont acquisition and $5 million of loans that were included in the sale of the Roseville branch office. In 2004, loans increased by $167 million or 6.1% exclusive of $223 million of loans that were acquired in the First Federal acquisition. Year-end loan balances increased by $39 million or 1.4% in 2003. In summary, year-end loan balances (exclusive of acquisitions) have increased by 1.7%, 6.1% and 1.4% for the years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The growth in loans in 2005 was negatively impacted by the decrease in the loan portfolios of First Federal and First Clermont. Their combined loan portfolios decreased by approximately $47 million in 2005. Management believes that the runoff in these two loan portfolios has stopped and that these loan portfolios will stabilize and grow slowly in 2006. Park added commercial lenders to its metropolitan area offices (Columbus, Cincinnati and Dayton) in 2004 and 2005 and has experienced faster loan growth in these markets. However, some of our subsidiary banks experienced decreases in loans during 2005 due to weak loan demand in their respective markets. Management believes that year-end loan balances will grow between 3% to 5% during 2006. A year ago, management projected that growth in year-end loan balances would be a little stronger than the 6.1% growth in 2004. This forecast was not correct due to runoff in the loan portfolios of First Federal and First Clermont and to weak loan demand in some of the markets where Park's subsidiary banks operate. Year-end residential real estate loans were $1,287 million, $1,190 million and $984 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Residential real estate loans increased by $9 million at year-end 2005 exclusive of $88 million of loans from the First Clermont acquisition. Residential real estate loans increased by $78 million or 7.9% at year-end 2004 exclusive of $129 million of loans from the First Federal acquisition. Residential real estate loans decreased by $15 million or 1.5% at year-end 2003. Management expects continued slow growth in residential real estate loans in 2006. The long-term fixed rate mortgage loans that Park originates are sold in the secondary market and Park retains the servicing on these loans. This activity, the origination and sale of fixed rate mortgage loans, produced a significant increase in fee income (Other service income) during 2003, but did not increase loan balances since the loans were sold. The sold fixed rate mortgage loans were $1,403 million (which includes $137 million of sold loans from First Clermont) at year-end 2005 compared to $1,266 million (which includes $78 million of sold loans from First Federal) at year-end 2004 compared to $1,166 million at year-end 2003. Management expects that the balance of sold fixed rate mortgage loans would remain relatively stable during 2006. Year-end consumer loans were $495 million, $505 million and $450 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Consumer loans decreased by $30 million or 5.9% at year-end 2005 exclusive of $20 million of loans from the First Clermont acquisition. Consumer loans increased by $3 million or .6% at year-end 2004 exclusive of $52 million of loans from the acquisition of First Federal. Consumer loans increased by $8 million or 1.9% in 2003. Management expects that the balance of consumer loans will decrease slightly in 2006 as the runoff from the consumer loan portfolios of First Federal and First Clermont has generally stopped. The demand for construction loans, commercial loans and commercial real estate loans continued to be relatively strong in 2005. On a combined basis, these loans totaled $1,529 million, $1,377 million and $1,232 million at year-end 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These combined loan totals increased by $96 million or 7.0% at year-end 2005 exclusive of $56 million of loans from the First Clermont acquisition. At year-end 2004, these combined loan totals increased by $105 million or 8.5% exclusive of $40 million of loans from the acquisition of First Federal. These combined loan totals increased by $76 million or 6.6% in 2003. Management expects that the growth in the commercial loan and commercial real estate portfolios will continue to be relatively strong in 2006. The emphasis will continue to be placed on further developing Park's commercial lending in the metropolitan markets where Park operates. Year-end lease balances were $17 million, $48 million and $65 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Management continues to de-emphasize automobile leasing and to a lesser extent commercial leasing. The year-end lease balances are expected to decrease by approximately $10 million in 2006. Table 3 reports year-end loan balances by type of loan for the past five years. TABLE 3 - LOANS BY TYPE
DECEMBER 31, 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 - ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Commercial, financial and agricultural $ 512,636 $ 469,382 $ 441,165 $ 440,030 $ 440,336 Real estate - construction 193,185 155,326 121,160 99,102 89,235 Real estate - residential 1,287,438 1,190,275 983,702 998,202 1,073,801 Real estate - commercial 823,354 752,428 670,082 617,270 595,567 Consumer, net of unearned income 494,975 505,151 450,145 441,747 477,579 Leases, net of unearned income 16,524 48,046 64,549 95,836 119,290 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL LOANS $3,328,112 $3,120,608 $2,730,803 $2,692,187 $2,795,808 ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
TABLE 4 - SELECTED LOAN MATURITY DISTRIBUTION
Over One Over One Year Through Five DECEMBER 31, 2005 or Less Five Years Years TOTAL - ----------------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Commercial, financial and agricultural $260,097 $155,657 $ 96,882 $512,636 Real estate - construction 97,351 46,950 48,884 193,185 -------- -------- -------- -------- TOTAL $357,448 $202,607 $145,766 $705,821 ======== ======== ======== ======== Total of these selected loans due after one year with: Fixed interest rate $144,287 Floating interest rate $204,086
INVESTMENT SECURITIES: Park's investment securities portfolio is structured to provide liquidity and contribute to earnings. Park's investment strategy is dynamic. As conditions change over time, Park's overall interest rate risk, liquidity needs and potential return on the investment portfolio will change. Management regularly reevaluates the securities in the investment portfolio based on circumstances as they evolve. Circumstances that may precipitate a sale of a security would be to better manage interest rate risk, to meet liquidity needs, or to improve the overall yield on the investment portfolio. Park classifies most of its securities as available-for-sale (see Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). These securities are carried on the books at their estimated fair value with the unrealized holding gain or loss, net of federal taxes, accounted for as accumulated other comprehensive income which is part of the Corporation's equity. 29 FINANCIAL REVIEW Management classified approximately 88% of the securities portfolio as available-for-sale at December 31, 2005. These securities are available to be sold in future periods in carrying out Park's investment strategies. The remaining securities are classified as held-to-maturity and are accounted for at amortized cost. Park realized net security gains of $96,000 in 2005 and net security losses of $793,000 in 2004 and $6.1 million in 2003. During the third quarter and fourth quarter of 2003, long-term interest rates increased. The increase in interest rates provided Park an opportunity to restructure the investment portfolio to improve earnings. The proceeds from the sale of investment securities were reinvested in higher yielding U.S. Government Agency mortgage-backed securities. Management expects that the net losses from the sale of investment securities during 2003 will be earned back in approximately three years from the higher reinvestment rate on the mortgage-backed securities. Average taxable investment securities were $1,758 million in 2005 compared to $1,795 million in 2004 and $1,633 million in 2003. The average yield on taxable securities was 4.87% in 2005 compared to 4.84% in 2004 and 4.54% in 2003. Average tax-exempt investment securities were $94 million in 2005 compared to $107 million in 2004 and $127 million in 2003. The average tax-equivalent yield on tax-exempt investment securities was 7.01% in 2005 compared to 7.17% in 2004 and 7.23% in 2003. On a combined basis, the total of the average balance of taxable and tax-exempt securities was 33.3% of average total assets in 2005 compared to 37.7% in 2004 and 36.6% in 2003. Average investment securities as a percentage of average total assets decreased in 2005. At year-end 2005, total investment securities (at amortized cost) were 30.9% of total assets. Management did not purchase investment securities during the second half of 2005 and used the cash flow from maturities and repayments of investment securities (approximately $212 million) to repay borrowings and provide funding for the increase in loan balances. The amount of investment securities purchased in 2006 will be dependent upon an increase in long-term interest rates. Without such an improvement in investment opportunities, management plans on using the cash flow from the maturities and repayments of investment securities (approximately $270 million) to repay borrowings in 2006 and provide funding for loans. At year-end 2005 and 2004, the average tax-equivalent yield on the total investment portfolio was 4.93% and 4.97%, respectively. The weighted average remaining maturity was 4.6 years at December 31, 2005 and 4.1 years at December 31, 2004. U.S. Government Agency asset-backed securities were approximately 91% of the total investment portfolio at year-end 2005 and at year-end 2004. This segment of the investment portfolio consists of fifteen-year mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The average maturity of the investment portfolio would lengthen if long-term interest rates would increase as the principal repayments from mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations would be reduced. At year-end 2005, management estimates that the average maturity of the investment portfolio would lengthen to 4.9 years with a 100 basis point increase in long-term interest rates and to 5.1 years with a 200 basis point increase in long-term interest rates. The following table sets forth the book value of investment securities at year-end: TABLE 5 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
DECEMBER 31, 2005 2004 2003 - ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Obligations of U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government agencies $ 996 $ 15,206 $ 25,354 Obligations of states and political subdivisions 85,336 103,739 121,008 U.S. Government asset-backed securities and other asset-backed securities 1,516,950 1,754,852 1,800,352 Other securities 60,060 52,985 44,512 ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL $1,663,342 $1,926,782 $1,991,226 ---------- ---------- ----------
Included in Other securities in Table 5, are the investments in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve stock. Park owned $52.1 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $5.9 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2004, Park owned $47.1 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $4.4 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock. Park owned $39.7 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $3.0 million of Federal Reserve stock at December 31, 2003. The fair values of these investments are the same as their amortized costs. EARNING RESULTS Park's principal source of earnings is net interest income, the difference between total interest income and total interest expense. Net interest income results from average balances outstanding for interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities in conjunction with the average rates earned and paid on them. (See Table 6 for three years of history on the average balances of the balance sheet and the average rates earned on interest earning assets and the average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities.) Net interest income increased by $8.3 million or 3.9% to $220.6 million for 2005 compared to an increase of $9.7 million or 4.8% to $212.3 million for 2004. The net yield on interest earning assets was 4.34% for 2005 compared to 4.56% for 2004 and 4.60% for 2003. The net interest rate spread--the difference between rates received for interest earning assets and the rates paid for interest bearing liabilities--was 3.98% for 2005 compared to 4.28% for 2004 and 4.30% for 2003. The increases in net interest income in both 2005 and 2004 was primarily due to increases in average interest earning assets for both years. In 2005, average interest earning assets increased by $418 million or 8.9%. In 2004, average interest earning assets increased by $232 million or 5.2%. The average yield on interest earning assets was 6.17% in 2005 compared to 5.80% in 2004 and 5.98% in 2003. The Federal Reserve Board increased the federal funds rate from 1.00% at June 30, 2004 to 2.25% at year-end 2004 and to 4.25% at year-end 2005. Management expects that the Federal Reserve Board will increase the federal funds rate to 4.75% during the first six months of 2006. The average yield on interest earning assets on a quarterly basis in 2005 was 5.97% for the first quarter, 6.05% for the second quarter, 6.23% for the third quarter and 6.41% for the fourth quarter. The average yield on loans on a quarterly basis in 2005 was 6.53% for the first quarter, 6.73% for the second quarter, 6.94% for the third quarter and 7.17% for the fourth quarter. Management expects that the average yield on interest earning assets and loans will continue to increase in 2006 as loans reprice at higher interest rates or mature and are replaced with higher yielding loans. The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities was 2.19% in 2005 compared to 1.52% in 2004 and 1.68% in 2003. The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits was 1.79% in 2005 compared to 1.36% in 2004 and 1.67% in 2003. The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities on a quarterly basis in 2005 was 1.93% for the first quarter, 2.13% for the second quarter, 2.26% for the third quarter and 2.46% for the fourth quarter. The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits on a quarterly basis in 2005 was 1.55% for the first quarter, 1.71% for the second quarter, 1.86% for the third quarter and 2.02% for the fourth quarter. Management expects that the average cost of interest bearing liabilities and the average rate paid on interest bearing deposits will continue to increase in 2006. Management expects that net interest income will increase modestly (2% to 3%) in 2006. Management expects modest growth in average interest earning assets and a slight improvement in the net yield on interest earning assets. A year ago, management projected that the net yield on interest earning assets would be approximately 4.35% in 2005. The actual results for 2005 were 4.34%. For 2006, management projects that the net yield on interest earning assets will be between 4.35% and 4.40%. 30 FINANCIAL REVIEW TABLE 6 - DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
2005 2004 ------------------------------- ------------------------------- DAILY AVERAGE Daily Average DECEMBER 31, AVERAGE INTEREST RATE Average Interest Rate - ------------ ---------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS INTEREST EARNING ASSETS: Loans (1) (2) $3,278,092 $224,346 6.84% $2,813,069 $179,458 6.38% Taxable investment securities 1,757,853 85,664 4.87% 1,794,544 86,806 4.84% Tax-exempt investment securities (3) 93,745 6,571 7.01% 106,585 7,637 7.17% Money market instruments 12,258 441 3.60% 9,366 219 2.34% ---------- -------- ---- ---------- -------- ---- TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS 5,141,948 317,022 6.17% 4,723,564 274,120 5.80% ---------- -------- ---- ---------- -------- ---- NONINTEREST EARNING ASSETS: Allowance for possible loan losses (71,052) (64,676) Cash and due from banks 148,303 142,102 Premises and equipment, net 46,418 36,540 Other assets 292,471 211,551 ---------- ---------- TOTAL $5,558,088 $5,049,081 ---------- ---------- LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES: Transaction accounts $1,007,576 $ 11,763 1.17% $ 871,264 $ 4,458 0.51% Savings deposits 633,545 3,328 0.53% 598,181 2,437 0.41% Time deposits 1,545,912 41,808 2.70% 1,476,915 33,103 2.24% ---------- -------- ---- ---------- -------- ---- TOTAL INTEREST BEARING DEPOSITS 3,187,033 56,899 1.79% 2,946,360 39,998 1.36% ---------- -------- ---- ---------- -------- ---- Short-term borrowings 291,842 7,508 2.57% 401,299 5,319 1.33% Long-term debt 799,888 29,488 3.69% 519,979 13,385 2.57% ---------- -------- ---- ---------- -------- ---- TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES 4,278,763 93,895 2.19% 3,867,638 58,702 1.52% ---------- -------- ---- ---------- -------- ---- NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES: Demand deposits 643,032 574,560 Other 77,082 68,608 ---------- ---------- Total noninterest bearing liabilities 720,114 643,168 ---------- ---------- Stockholders' equity 559,211 538,275 ---------- ---------- TOTAL $5,558,088 $5,049,081 ---------- ---------- Net interest earnings $223,127 $215,418 Net interest spread 3.98% 4.28% Net yield on interest earning assets 4.34% 4.56% 2003 ------------------------------- Daily Average DECEMBER 31, Average Interest Rate - ------------ ---------- -------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS INTEREST EARNING ASSETS: Loans (1) (2) $2,695,830 $184,676 6.85% Taxable investment securities 1,632,565 74,089 4.54% Tax-exempt investment securities (3) 127,251 9,199 7.23% Money market instruments 35,768 443 1.24% ---------- -------- ---- TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS 4,491,414 268,407 5.98% ---------- -------- ---- NONINTEREST EARNING ASSETS: Allowance for possible loan losses (64,735) Cash and due from banks 133,157 Premises and equipment, net 38,077 Other assets 205,350 ---------- TOTAL $4,803,263 ---------- LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES: Transaction accounts $ 797,421 $ 4,437 0.56% Savings deposits 571,448 3,589 0.63% Time deposits 1,532,966 40,574 2.65% ---------- -------- ---- TOTAL INTEREST BEARING DEPOSITS 2,901,835 48,600 1.67% ---------- -------- ---- Short-term borrowings 515,328 2,738 0.53% Long-term debt 281,599 10,654 3.78% ---------- -------- ---- TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES 3,698,762 61,992 1.68% ---------- -------- ---- NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES: Demand deposits 522,456 Other 61,654 ---------- Total noninterest bearing liabilities 584,110 ---------- Stockholders' equity 520,391 ---------- TOTAL $4,803,263 ---------- Net interest earnings $206,415 Net interest spread 4.30% Net yield on interest earning assets 4.60%
(1) Loan income includes loan related fee income of $3,809 in 2005, $3,336 in 2004 and $4,882 in 2003. Loan income also includes the effects of taxable equivalent adjustments using a 35% tax rate in 2005, 2004 and 2003. The taxable equivalent adjustment was $478 in 2005, $605 in 2004 and $747 in 2003. (2) For the purpose of the computation, non-accrual loans are included in the daily average loans outstanding. (3) Interest income on tax-exempt investment securities includes the effects of taxable equivalent adjustments using a 35% tax rate in 2005, 2004 and 2003. The taxable equivalent adjustments were $2,085 in 2005, $2,522 in 2004 and $3,031 in 2003. The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. TABLE 7 - VOLUME/RATE VARIANCE ANALYSIS
CHANGE FROM 2004 TO 2005 Change From 2003 to 2004 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- VOLUME RATE TOTAL Volume Rate Total (IN THOUSANDS) Increase (decrease) in: Interest income: TOTAL LOANS $31,256 $ 13,632 $44,888 $ 7,806 $(13,024) $(5,218) ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- Taxable investments (1,703) 561 (1,142) 7,633 5,084 12,717 Tax-exempt investments (899) (167) (1,066) (1,486) (76) (1,562) Money market instruments 81 141 222 (459) 235 (224) ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- TOTAL INTEREST INCOME 28,735 14,167 42,902 13,494 (7,781) 5,713 ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- Interest expense: Transaction accounts $ 788 $ 6,517 $ 7,305 $ 417 $ (396) $ 21 Savings accounts 150 741 891 161 (1,313) (1,152) Time deposits 1,613 7,092 8,705 (1,428) (6,043) (7,471) Short-term borrowings (1,757) 3,946 2,189 (724) 3,305 2,581 Long-term debt 8,899 7,204 16,103 6,926 (4,195) 2,731 ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 9,693 25,500 35,193 5,352 (8,642) (3,290) ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- NET VARIANCE $19,042 $(11,333) $ 7,709 $ 8,142 $ 861 $ 9,003 ======= ======== ======= ======= ======== =======
OTHER INCOME: Total other income, exclusive of security gains or losses, increased by $7.0 million or 13.2% to $59.6 million in 2005 compared to a decrease of $8.9 million or 14.5% to $52.6 million in 2004. Income from fiduciary activities increased by $897,000 or 8.1% to $12.0 million in 2005 and increased by $892,000 or 8.7% in 2004. These increases are primarily due to growth in the number of customers being served. Management expects a similar increase (8% to 9%) in fee income from fiduciary activities in 2006. First Federal and First Clermont did not have any fee income from fiduciary activities. Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $2.3 million or 14.7% to $17.9 million in 2005 and increased by $1.3 million or 9.2% to $15.6 million in 2004. The primary reason for the large increase in service charges on deposit accounts in 2005 was due to the additional deposit customers from the First Federal and First Clermont acquisitions. Management expects that service charges on deposit accounts will increase by approximately 7% in 2006. Fee income earned from the origination and sale into the secondary market of fixed rate mortgage loans is included with other non-yield related loan fees in the subcategory "other service income". Other service income increased by $428,000 or 4.1% to $10.8 million in 2005 and decreased by $11.3 million or 52.3% in 2004. Other service income was $10.3 million in 2004 and $21.6 31 FINANCIAL REVIEW million in 2003. During 2003, long-term interest rates decreased and ignited a mortgage loan refinancing boom, which produced record mortgage loan volume. Management expects that other service income for 2006 will be about the same as the 2005 fee income of $10.8 million. The subcategory of "other income" increased by $3.4 million or 21.6% to $19.0 million in 2005 and increased by $173,000 or 1.1% to $15.6 million in 2004. The large increase in other income in 2005 was primarily due to the additional customers from the First Federal and First Clermont acquisitions. This subcategory includes fees earned from check card and ATM services, fee income from bank owned life insurance, fee income earned from the sale of investment and insurance products, rental fee income from safety deposit boxes and fees earned from the sale of official and printed checks. For 2006, management expects that other income will be about the same as the 2005 fee income of $19.0 million. A year ago, management projected that total other income, exclusive of security gains or losses, would be approximately $59.5 million in 2005 and actual results for 2005 were $59.6 million. Management expects that total other income, exclusive of security gains or losses, will be approximately $61.5 million in 2006. OTHER EXPENSE: Total other expense increased by $13.1 million or 10.3% to $139.4 million in 2005 and increased by $3.9 million or 3.2% to $126.3 million in 2004. The large increase in total other expense in 2005 of 10.3% was primarily due to the acquisitions of First Federal and First Clermont. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $7.0 million or 9.8% to $78.5 million in 2005 and increased by $3.4 million or 5.0% in 2004. Full-time equivalent employees at year-end 2005 were 1,824 (which includes 67 at First Clermont) compared to 1,749 at year-end 2004 (which includes 56 at First Federal). Full-time equivalent employees at year-end 2003 were 1,645. None of the employees of First Federal and First Clermont were included in salary and benefit expense in 2004, but were included for the entire year of 2005. This accounts for the large increase in salaries and employee benefits expense in 2005 of 9.8% compared to 5.0% in 2004. A year ago, management projected that salaries and employee benefit expense would be approximately $81 million for 2005 compared to the actual expense of $78.5 million in 2005. This positive variance was due to the addition of less employees in 2005 than anticipated and to no increase in the officer incentive compensation pool. Management expects that salaries and employee benefits expense will increase by approximately 5% in 2006. The expense for amortization of intangibles was $2.5 million in 2005, $1.5 million in 2004 and $3.1 million in 2003. The increase in this expense in 2005 was due to the acquisitions of First Federal and First Clermont. The reduction in the amortization of intangibles in 2004 was due to the completion of the amortization of core deposit intangibles at the Fairfield National Division in 2003. Intangibles amortization expense is expected to be $2.5 million in 2006. Data processing expense increased by $1.7 million or 19.5% to $10.6 million in 2005 and increased by $1.1 million or 13.8% in 2004. The large increase in data processing expense in 2005 was primarily due to the acquisitions of First Federal and First Clermont. Data processing expense is expected to increase by approximately 11% in 2006. A year ago, management projected that total other expense would be approximately $143 million in 2005 compared to actual results of $139.4 million. Most of the positive variance was due to salary and employee benefit expense being $2.5 million below the projected amount. For 2006, management expects that total other expense will increase by about 4% to approximately $145 million. See Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the accounting for Park's incentive stock option plan. Park is adopting SFAS No. 123R "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" using the "modified prospective" method on January 1, 2006. This method recognizes compensation expense beginning with the effective date (January 1, 2006) for all stock options that are granted or become vested after December 31, 2005. The "modified retrospective" method includes the requirements of the "modified prospective" method described above, but also permits entities to restate prior period results based on the amounts previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes of pro-forma disclosures. Management has decided that prior period results will not be restated. Park granted 228,150 incentive stock options in 2005, 232,178 in 2004 and 179,125 in 2003. The pro-forma impact on earnings for 2005, 2004 and 2003 would have decreased earnings by $3.7 million, $3.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Management expects that a significantly reduced number of incentive stock options will be granted in 2006 and that the related expense will be approximately $1 million. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES: Federal income tax expense as a percentage of income before taxes was 29.7% in 2005, 29.2% in 2004 and 29.5% in 2003. A lower effective tax percentage rate than the statutory rate of thirty-five percent is primarily due to tax-exempt interest income from state and municipal investments and loans and low income housing tax credits. Park and its subsidiary banks do not pay state income tax to the state of Ohio, but pay a franchise tax based on their year-end equity. The franchise tax expense is included in "state taxes" on Park's Consolidated Statements of Income. State tax expense was $2.9 million in 2005 and $2.5 million in both 2004 and 2003. CREDIT EXPERIENCE PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES: The provision for loan losses is the amount added to the allowance for loan losses to absorb future loan charge-offs. The amount of the loan loss provision is determined by management after reviewing the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, historic and current loan loss experience and current economic conditions. The provision for loan losses was $5.4 million in 2005, $8.6 million in 2004 and $12.6 million in 2003. Net loan charge-offs were $5.9 million in 2005, $7.9 million in 2004 and $11.5 million in 2003. The ratio of net loan charge-offs to average loans was .18% in 2005, .28% in 2004 and .43% in 2003. At year-end 2005, the allowance for loan losses was $69.7 million or 2.09% of total loans outstanding, compared to $68.3 million or 2.19% of total loans outstanding at year-end 2004 and $63.1 million or 2.31% of total loans outstanding at year-end 2003. First Clermont's allowance for loan losses of $1.8 million was added to Park's allowance for loan losses in 2005 and First Federal's allowance for loan losses of $4.45 million was added to Park's allowance for loan losses at year-end 2004. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at year-end 2005 is adequate to absorb probable credit losses in the loan portfolio. See Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on management's evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. 32 FINANCIAL REVIEW The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the past five years. The charge-offs and recoveries are listed by type of loan for each year. TABLE 8 - SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) AVERAGE LOANS (NET OF UNEARNED INTEREST) $3,278,092 $2,813,069 $2,695,830 $2,719,805 $2,881,551 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES: Beginning balance $ 68,328 $ 63,142 $ 62,028 $ 59,959 $ 57,473 CHARGE-OFFS: Commercial, financial and agricultural 3,154 2,557 4,698 7,210 3,770 Real estate - construction 46 613 -- 317 180 Real estate - residential 1,006 1,476 1,173 1,208 1,262 Real estate - commercial 1,612 1,951 1,947 884 1,181 Consumer 7,255 8,111 9,233 8,606 9,908 Lease financing 316 465 985 1,602 1,519 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL CHARGE-OFFS 13,389 15,173 18,036 19,827 17,820 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- RECOVERIES: Commercial, financial and agricultural $ 2,707 $ 2,138 $ 1,543 $ 1,812 $ 2,453 Real estate - construction 173 67 175 -- -- Real estate - residential 659 650 549 969 433 Real estate - commercial 517 292 407 565 223 Consumer 3,214 3,633 3,236 2,891 3,426 Lease financing 229 529 645 616 712 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL RECOVERIES 7,499 7,309 6,555 6,853 7,247 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- NET CHARGE-OFFS 5,890 7,864 11,481 12,974 10,573 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Provision charged to earnings 5,407 8,600 12,595 15,043 13,059 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Allowance for loan losses of acquired bank 1,849 4,450 -- -- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ENDING BALANCE $ 69,694 $ 68,328 $ 63,142 $ 62,028 $ 59,959 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- RATIO OF NET CHARGE-OFFS TO AVERAGE LOANS 0.18% 0.28% 0.43% 0.48% 0.37% RATIO OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES TO END OF YEAR LOANS, NET OF UNEARNED INTEREST 2.09% 2.19% 2.31% 2.30% 2.14% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
The following table summarizes the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for the past five years: TABLE 9 - ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PERCENT OF LOANS PER LOANS PER LOANS PER LOANS PER LOANS PER DECEMBER 31, ALLOWANCE CATEGORY ALLOWANCE CATEGORY ALLOWANCE CATEGORY ALLOWANCE CATEGORY ALLOWANCE CATEGORY - ------------ --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Commercial, financial and agricultural $17,942 15.40% $17,837 15.04% $17,117 16.16% $17,049 16.34% $15,853 15.75% Real estate - construction 3,864 5.80% 3,107 4.98% 2,423 4.44% 1,982 3.68% 1,562 3.19% Real estate - residential 10,329 38.68% 8,926 38.14% 7,378 36.02% 7,504 37.17% 8,053 38.41% Real estate - commercial 16,823 24.74% 16,930 24.11% 15,412 24.54% 13,889 22.93% 12,080 21.30% Consumer 19,799 14.87% 20,206 16.19% 18,681 16.48% 18,322 16.40% 19,131 17.08% Leases 937 0.51% 1,322 1.54% 2,131 2.36% 3,282 3.48% 3,280 4.27% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ TOTAL $69,694 100.00% $68,328 100.00% $63,142 100.00% $62,028 100.00% $59,959 100.00% ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ======
As of December 31, 2005, Park had no significant concentrations of loans to borrowers engaged in the same or similar industries nor did Park have any loans to foreign governments. NONPERFORMING ASSETS: Nonperforming loans include: 1) loans whose interest is accounted for on a nonaccrual basis; 2) loans whose terms have been renegotiated; and 3) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments but whose interest continues to accrue. Other real estate owned results from taking title to property used as collateral for a defaulted loan. The following is a summary of the nonaccrual, past due and renegotiated loans and other real estate owned for the last five years: TABLE 10 - NONPERFORMING ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 - ------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Nonaccrual loans $14,922 $17,873 $15,921 $17,579 $17,303 Renegotiated loans 7,441 5,461 5,452 2,599 2,254 Loans past due 90 days or more 7,661 5,439 4,367 6,290 7,550 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- TOTAL NONPERFORMING LOANS 30,024 28,773 25,740 26,468 27,107 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Other real estate owned 2,368 2,680 2,319 3,206 3,425 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- TOTAL NONPERFORMING ASSETS $32,392 $31,453 $28,059 $29,674 $30,532 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- PERCENTAGE OF NONPERFORMING LOANS TO LOANS,NET OF UNEARNED INTEREST 0.90% 0.92% 0.94% 0.98% 0.97% PERCENTAGE OF NONPERFORMING ASSETS TO LOANS,NET OF UNEARNED INTEREST 0.97% 1.01% 1.03% 1.10% 1.09% PERCENTAGE OF NONPERFORMING ASSETS TO TOTAL ASSETS 0.60% 0.58% 0.56% 0.67% 0.67% ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Tax equivalent interest income from loans of $224.3 million for 2005 would have increased by $1.7 million if all loans had been current in accordance with their original terms. Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2005 in the approximate amount of $787,000 is included in interest income for those loans in accordance with their original terms. The Corporation had $130.8 million of loans included on the Corporation's watch list of potential problem loans at December 31, 2005 compared to $131.8 million at year-end 2004 and $177.7 million at year-end 2003. The existing conditions of these loans do not warrant classification as nonaccrual. Management performs additional analyses regarding a borrower's ability to comply with payment terms for watch list loans. As a percentage of year-end loans, the Corporation's watch list of potential problem loans was 3.9% in 2005, 4.2% in 2004 and 6.5% in 2003. Management expects that the Corporation's watch list of potential problem loans at year-end 2006 will be similar to year-end 2005 as economic conditions are relatively stable. A year-ago, management projected that watch list loans at year-end 2005 would be similar to year-end 2004, which was accurate. CAPITAL RESOURCES LIQUIDITY AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY MANAGEMENT: The Corporation's objective in managing its liquidity is to maintain the ability to continuously meet the cash flow needs of customers, such as borrowings or deposit withdrawals, while at the same time seeking higher yields from longer-term lending and investing activities. 33 FINANCIAL REVIEW Cash and cash equivalents increased by $12.1 million during 2005 to $174.0 million at year end. Cash provided by operating activities was $81.0 million in 2005, $86.7 million in 2004 and $99.2 million in 2003. Net income was the primary source of cash for operating activities during each year. Cash provided by investing activities was $142.5 million in 2005. Cash used in investing activities was $147.8 million in 2004 and $665.0 million in 2003. Security transactions are the major use or source of cash in investing activities. Proceeds from the sale or maturity of securities provide cash and purchases of securities use cash. Net security transactions provided $236.5 million of cash in 2005 and $64.6 million of cash in 2004. Net security transactions used $615.9 million of cash in 2003. The other major use or source of cash in investing activities is the net increase or decrease in the loan portfolio. Cash used by the net increase in the loan portfolio was $53.6 million in 2005, $171.8 million in 2004 and $45.2 million in 2003. Cash used by financing activities was $211.4 million in 2005. Cash provided by financing activities was $53.2 million in 2004 and $496.7 million in 2003. A major source of cash for financing activities is the net change in deposits. Cash used by the net decrease in deposits was $55.5 million in 2005 and $80.9 million in 2003. Cash provided by the net increase in deposits was $103.3 million in 2004. Changes in short-term borrowings or long-term debt is another major source or use of cash for financing activities. The net increase in short-term borrowings provided cash of $35.8 million in 2005 and $327.9 million in 2003. The net decrease in short-term borrowings used cash of $256.8 million in 2004. Cash was used by the net decrease in long-term debt of $102.6 million in 2005. Cash was provided by the net increase in long-term debt of $271.4 million in 2004 and $298.8 million in 2003. Funds are available from a number of sources, including the securities portfolio, the core deposit base, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, and the capability to securitize or package loans for sale. The present funding sources provide more than adequate liquidity for the Corporation to meet its cash flow needs. The increase or decrease in the investment portfolio and short-term borrowings and long-term debt is greatly dependent upon the growth in loans and deposits. The primary objective of management is to grow loan and deposit totals. To the extent that management is unable to grow loan totals at a desired growth rate, additional investment securities may be added to the balance sheet. Likewise, short-term borrowings and long-term debt are utilized to fund the growth in earning assets if the growth in deposits and the cash flow from operations are not sufficient to do so. Liquidity is enhanced by assets maturing or repricing within one year. Assets maturing or repricing within one year were $2,446 million or 49.0% of interest earning assets at year-end 2005. Liquidity is also enhanced by a significant amount of stable core deposits from a variety of customers in several Ohio markets served by the Corporation. An asset/liability committee monitors and forecasts rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities and develops strategies and pricing policies to influence the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities. The purpose of these efforts is to guard the Corporation from adverse impacts of unforeseen swings in interest rates and to enhance the net income of the Corporation by accepting a limited amount of interest rate risk, based on interest rate projections. The following table shows interest rate sensitivity data for five different time intervals as of December 31, 2005: TABLE 11 - INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
Over 5 0-3 Months 3-12 Months 1-3 Years 3-5 Years Years TOTAL ---------- ----------- ---------- --------- -------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) INTEREST RATE SENSITIVE ASSETS: Investment securities (1) $ 121,306 $ 199,987 $ 439,846 $304,960 $597,543 $1,663,642 Money market instruments 4,283 -- -- -- -- 4,283 Loans (1) 1,158,193 962,116 1,051,735 143,262 12,806 3,328,112 ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS 1,283,782 1,162,103 1,491,581 448,222 610,349 4,996,037 ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES: Interest bearing transaction accounts 530,699 -- 457,255 -- -- 987,954 Savings accounts (2) 297,353 -- 297,353 -- -- 594,706 Time deposits 299,734 667,992 437,058 97,731 3,388 1,505,903 Other 1,866 -- -- -- -- 1,866 ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- TOTAL DEPOSITS 1,129,652 667,992 1,191,666 97,731 3,388 3,090,429 ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- Short-term borrowings 314,074 -- -- -- -- 314,074 Long-term debt 291,000 107,475 187,936 48,621 79,752 714,784 ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES 1,734,726 775,467 1,379,602 146,352 83,140 4,119,287 ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY GAP (450,944) 386,636 111,979 301,870 527,209 876,750 CUMULATIVE RATE SENSITIVITY GAP (450,944) (64,308) 47,671 349,541 876,750 -- CUMULATIVE GAP AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS -9.03% -1.29% 0.95% 7.00% 17.55% -- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
(1) Investment securities and loans that are subject to prepayment are shown in the table by the earlier of their repricing date or their expected repayment dates and not by their contractual maturity. (2) Management considers interest bearing checking accounts and savings accounts to be core deposits and therefore, not as rate sensitive as other deposit accounts and borrowed money. Accordingly, only 54% of interest bearing transaction accounts and 50% of savings accounts are considered to reprice within one year. If all of the interest bearing checking accounts and savings accounts were considered to reprice within one year, the one year cumulative gap would change from a negative 1.29% to a negative 16.39%. The interest rate sensitivity gap analysis provides a good overall picture of the Corporation's static interest rate risk position. The Corporation's policy is that the twelve month cumulative gap position should not exceed fifteen percent of interest earning assets for three consecutive quarters. At December 31, 2005, the cumulative interest earning assets maturing or repricing within twelve months were $2,446 million compared to the cumulative interest bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within twelve months of $2,510 million. For the twelve-month cumulative gap position, rate sensitive liabilities exceed rate sensitive assets by $64 million or 1.3% of interest earning assets. A negative twelve month cumulative rate sensitivity gap (liabilities exceeding assets) would suggest that the Corporation's net interest margin would decrease if interest rates were to rise. However, the usefulness of the interest sensitivity gap analysis as a forecasting tool in projecting net interest income is limited. The gap analysis does not consider the magnitude by which assets or liabilities will reprice during a period and also contains assumptions as to the repricing of transaction and savings accounts that may not prove to be correct. 34 FINANCIAL REVIEW The cumulative twelve month interest rate sensitivity gap position at December 31, 2004 was a positive $453 million or a positive 9.0% of interest earning assets compared to a negative $64 million or a negative 1.3% of interest earning assets at December 31, 2005. This change in the cumulative twelve month interest rate sensitivity gap of a negative $517 million was primarily due to a decrease in the amount of loans repricing or maturing in one year to $2,120 million at year-end 2005 compared to $2,467 million at year-end 2004. The loans repricing or maturing within one to three years totaled $1,052 million at year-end 2005 compared to $450 million at year-end 2004. Management supplements the interest rate sensitivity gap analysis with periodic simulations of balance sheet sensitivity under various interest rate and what-if scenarios to better forecast and manage the net interest margin. The Corporation uses an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates. This model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the impact of changing interest rates on the prepayment rate of certain assets and liabilities. This model also includes management's projections for activity levels of various balance sheet instruments and noninterest fee income and operating expense. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into this earnings simulation model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income and net income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies. Management uses a 50 basis point change in market interest rates per quarter for a total of 200 basis points per year in evaluating the impact of changing interest rates on net interest income and net income over a twelve month horizon. At December 31, 2005, the earnings simulation model projected that net income would decrease by .2% using a rising interest rate scenario and increase by .9% using a declining interest rate scenario over the next year. At December 31, 2004, the earnings simulation model projected that net income would increase by .9% using a rising interest rate scenario and decrease by .9% using a declining interest rate scenario over the next year and at December 31, 2003, the earnings simulation model projected that net income would increase by .1% using a rising interest rate scenario and decrease by 1.3% using a declining interest rate scenario over the next year. Consistently, over the past several years the earnings simulation model has projected that changes in interest rates would have only a small impact on net income and the net interest margin. The net interest margin has been relatively stable over the past five years at 4.34% in 2005, 4.56% in 2004, 4.60% in 2003, 5.06% in 2002 and 4.92% in 2001. A major goal of the asset/liability committee is to have a relatively stable net interest margin regardless of the level of interest rates. Management expects that the net interest margin will be 4.35% to 4.40% in 2006. The decrease in the net interest margin for 2005 was largely due to the cash acquisitions of First Federal and First Clermont. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS In the ordinary course of operations, Park enters into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include the funding of operations through debt issuances as well as leases for premises. The following table summarizes Park's significant and determinable obligations by payment date at December 31, 2005. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced Note to the Consolidated Financial Statements. TABLE 12 - CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
PAYMENTS DUE IN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Table/ DECEMBER 31,2005 Notes 0-1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years Over 5 Years TOTAL - ---------------- ------ ---------- --------- --------- ------------ ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Deposits without stated maturity $2,251,854 $ -- $ -- $ -- $2,251,854 Certificates of deposit 11 967,726 437,058 97,731 3,388 1,505,903 Short-term borrowings 11 314,074 -- -- -- 314,074 Long-term debt 10 113,268 188,353 183,519 229,644 714,784 Operating leases 8 1,758 3,084 1,861 833 7,536 Purchase obligations 39 -- -- -- 39 ---------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- TOTAL CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS $3,648,719 $628,495 $283,111 $233,865 $4,794,190 ========== ======== ======== ======== ==========
The Corporation's operating lease obligations represent short-term and long-term lease and rental payments for facilities and equipment. Purchase obligations represent obligations under agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on the Corporation. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES, AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS: In order to meet the financing needs of its customers, the Corporation issues loan commitments and standby letters of credit. At December 31, 2005, the Corporation had $667 million of loan commitments for commercial, commercial real estate, and residential real estate loans and had $133 million of commitments for revolving home equity and credit card lines. Standby letters of credit totaled $21 million at December 31, 2005. Commitments to extend credit under loan commitments and standby letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. These commitments often expire without being drawn upon. However, all of the loan commitments and standby letters of credit are permitted to be drawn upon in 2006. See Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on loan commitments and standby letters of credit. The Corporation did not have any significant contingent liabilities at December 31, 2005, and did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements at year-end 2005. CAPITAL: Park's primary means of maintaining capital adequacy is through net retained earnings. At December 31, 2005, the Corporation's equity capital was $558.4 million, compared to $562.6 million at December 31, 2004. Stockholders' equity at December 31, 2005 was 10.27% of total assets compared to 10.39% of total assets at December 31, 2004. The decrease in stockholders' equity at year-end 2005 compared to year-end 2004 was primarily due to the net increase in treasury stock of $25.3 million and the decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $22.6 million. Park purchased 281,360 treasury shares for general corporate purposes and for the incentive stock option plans. Long-term interest rates increased during 2005 and the market value of Park's investment securities decreased causing the decrease in other comprehensive income. Financial institution regulators have established guidelines for minimum capital ratios for banks, thrifts and bank holding companies. The unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale securities is not included in computing regulatory capital. The capital standard of risk-based capital to risk-based assets was 8.00% at December 31, 2005. At year-end 2005, the Corporation had a risk-based capital ratio of 15.43% or capital above the minimum required by $261 million. The capital standard of tier l capital to risk-based assets was 4.00% at December 31, 2005. Tier l capital includes stockholders' equity net of goodwill and other intangible assets. At year-end 2005, the Corporation had a tier l capital to risk-based assets ratio of 14.17% or capital above the minimum required by $358 million. Bank regulators have also established a leverage capital ratio of 4%, consisting of tier 1 capital to total assets, not risk adjusted. At year-end 2005, the Corporation had a leverage capital ratio of 9.27% or capital above the minimum required by $283 million. Regulatory guidelines also establish capital ratio requirements for "well capitalized" bank holding companies. The capital ratios are 10% for 35 FINANCIAL REVIEW risk-based capital, 6% for tier 1 capital to risk-based assets and 5% for tier 1 capital to total assets. The Corporation exceeds these higher capital standards and therefore is classified as "well capitalized." The financial institution subsidiaries of the Corporation each met the well capitalized ratio guidelines at December 31, 2005. See note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the capital ratios for the Corporation and its financial institution subsidiaries. EFFECTS OF INFLATION: Balance sheets of financial institutions typically contain assets and liabilities that are monetary in nature and, therefore, differ greatly from those of most commercial and industrial companies which have significant investments in premises, equipment and inventory. During periods of inflation, financial institutions that are in a net positive monetary position will experience a decline in purchasing power, which does have an impact on growth. Another significant effect on internal equity growth is other expenses, which tend to rise during periods of inflation. Management believes the most significant impact on financial results is the Corporation's ability to align its asset/liability management program to react to changes in interest rates. The following table summarizes five-year financial information. All per share data have been retroactively restated for the 5% stock dividend paid on December 15, 2004. TABLE 13 - CONSOLIDATED FIVE-YEAR SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
DECEMBER 31, 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 - ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: Interest income $ 314,459 $ 270,993 $ 264,629 $ 287,920 $ 320,348 Interest expense 93,895 58,702 61,992 82,588 127,404 Net interest income 220,564 212,291 202,637 205,332 192,944 Provision for loan losses 5,407 8,600 12,595 15,043 13,059 Net interest income after provision for loan losses 215,157 203,691 190,042 190,289 179,885 Gain/(loss) on sale of securities 96 (793) (6,060) (182) 140 Noninterest income 59,609 52,641 61,583 51,032 45,098 Noninterest expense 139,438 126,290 122,376 119,964 114,207 Net income 95,238 91,507 86,878 85,579 78,362 PER SHARE: Net income - basic 6.68 6.38 6.01 5.87 5.32 Net income - diluted 6.64 6.32 5.97 5.86 5.31 Cash dividends declared 3.620 3.414 3.209 2.962 2.752 AVERAGE BALANCES: Loans $3,278,092 $2,813,069 $2,695,830 $2,719,805 $2,881,551 Investment securities 1,851,598 1,901,129 1,759,816 1,384,750 1,105,707 Money market instruments and other 12,258 9,366 35,768 36,679 21,021 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL EARNING ASSETS 5,141,948 4,723,564 4,491,414 4,141,234 4,008,279 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Noninterest bearing deposits 643,032 574,560 522,456 502,400 460,219 Interest bearing deposits 3,187,033 2,946,360 2,901,835 2,901,456 2,735,046 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL DEPOSITS 3,830,065 3,520,920 3,424,291 3,403,856 3,195,265 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Short-term borrowings 291,842 401,299 515,328 226,238 279,244 Long-term debt 799,888 519,979 281,599 252,834 295,669 Stockholders' equity 559,211 538,275 520,391 487,316 452,287 Total assets 5,558,088 5,049,081 4,803,263 4,435,162 4,270,004 RATIOS: Return on average assets 1.71% 1.81% 1.81% 1.93% 1.84% Return on average equity 17.03% 17.00% 16.69% 17.56% 17.33% Net interest margin (1) 4.34% 4.56% 4.60% 5.06% 4.92% Noninterest expense to net revenue (1) 49.32% 47.11% 45.66% 46.02% 47.11% Dividend payout ratio 54.19% 53.54% 53.42% 50.42% 51.64% Average stockholders' equity to average total assets 10.06% 10.66% 10.83% 10.99% 10.59% Leverage capital 9.27% 10.10% 10.79% 10.72% 9.97% Tier 1 capital 14.17% 15.16% 16.51% 16.51% 14.84% Risk-based capital 15.43% 16.43% 17.78% 17.78% 16.09%
(1) Computed on a fully taxable equivalent basis The following table is a summary of selected quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Certain quarterly amounts have been reclassified to conform to the year-end financial statement presentation. TABLE 14 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
THREE MONTHS ENDED ----------------------------------------------------- MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPT.30 DEC.31 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 2005: Interest income $ 74,959 $ 78,928 $ 79,768 $ 80,804 Interest expense 20,514 23,516 24,217 25,648 Net interest income 54,445 55,412 55,551 55,156 Provision for loan losses 1,082 1,325 1,600 1,400 Gain (loss) on sale of securities -- 96 -- -- Income before income taxes 33,071 35,303 34,763 32,287 Net income 23,342 24,770 24,295 22,831 Per share data: Net income - basic 1.63 1.73 1.70 1.62 Net income - diluted 1.61 1.72 1.69 1.61 Weighted-average common stock outstanding - basic 14,331,261 14,312,032 14,256,723 14,134,058 Weighted-average common stock equivalent - diluted 14,475,634 14,379,463 14,338,418 14,199,455 2004: Interest income $ 66,787 $ 66,372 $ 68,604 $ 69,230 Interest expense 14,171 13,850 14,794 15,887 Net interest income 52,616 52,522 53,810 53,343 Provision for loan losses 1,465 1,905 2,745 2,485 Gain (loss) on sale of securities 106 -- -- (899) Income before income taxes 32,604 34,368 32,982 29,295 Net income 22,978 24,085 23,547 20,897 Per share data: Net income - basic 1.59 1.68 1.65 1.46 Net income - diluted 1.58 1.67 1.63 1.44 Weighted-average common stock outstanding - basic 14,443,898 14,341,123 14,289,060 14,305,004 Weighted-average common stock equivalent - diluted 14,553,019 14,464,537 14,427,971 14,499,782
The Corporation's common stock (symbol: PRK) is traded on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX). At December 31, 2005, the Corporation had 4,982 stockholders of record. The following table sets forth the high, low and closing sale prices of, and dividends declared on the common stock for each quarterly period for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, as reported by AMEX. TABLE 15 - MARKET AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
CASH DIVIDEND LAST DECLARED HIGH LOW PRICE PER SHARE ------- ------- ------- --------- 2005: FIRST QUARTER $133.30 $108.40 $112.50 $0.900 SECOND QUARTER 113.01 99.04 110.50 0.900 THIRD QUARTER 118.20 104.55 108.27 0.900 FOURTH QUARTER 112.91 101.00 102.64 0.920 2004: First Quarter $110.24 $105.33 $107.90 $0.838 Second Quarter 124.76 107.52 121.63 0.838 Third Quarter 125.08 108.48 121.17 0.838 Fourth Quarter 141.25 119.29 135.50 0.900
36 MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING To the Board of Directors and Stockholders Park National Corporation The management of Park National Corporation (the "Corporation") is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Corporation's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Corporation's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: a.) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries; b.) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation; and c.) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries that could have a material effect on the financial statements. The Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits. Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are identified. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. With the supervision and participation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, our President and our Chief Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth for effective internal control over financial reporting by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management concluded that the Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. Park's independent registered public accounting firm (Ernst & Young LLP) has issued an attestation report on management's assessment of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting which follows this report. /s/ C. Daniel DeLawder /s/ David L. Trautman /s/ John W. Kozak - -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- C. Daniel DeLawder David L. Trautman John W. Kozak Chairman and President Chief Financial Officer Chief Executive Officer February 21, 2006 37 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders Park National Corporation We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The management of Park National Corporation and its subsidiaries are responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, management's assessment that Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 and our report dated February 21, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. (ERNST & YOUNG LLP) Columbus, Ohio February 21, 2006 38 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders Park National Corporation We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. (ERNST & YOUNG LLP) Columbus, Ohio February 21, 2006 39 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES at December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Dollars in thousands)
2005 2004 ---------- ---------- ASSETS Cash and due from banks $ 169,690 $ 155,529 Money market instruments 4,283 6,300 Interest bearing deposits with other banks 300 2,096 INVESTMENT SECURITIES: Securities available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $1,424,955 and $1,783,724 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively) 1,409,351 1,802,865 Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $190,425 and $73,613 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively) 195,953 72,447 Other investment securities 58,038 51,470 ---------- ---------- TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES 1,663,342 1,926,782 ---------- ---------- Loans 3,333,713 3,125,829 Unearned loan interest (5,601) (5,221) ---------- ---------- TOTAL LOANS 3,328,112 3,120,608 ---------- ---------- Allowance for loan losses (69,694) (68,328) ---------- ---------- NET LOANS 3,258,418 3,052,280 ---------- ---------- OTHER ASSETS: Bank owned life insurance 109,600 94,909 Goodwill and other intangible assets 69,188 40,887 Premises and equipment, net 47,172 43,179 Accrued interest receivable 23,306 20,548 Other 90,749 70,074 ---------- ---------- TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 340,015 269,597 ---------- ---------- TOTAL ASSETS $5,436,048 $5,412,584 ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 40 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED) PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES at December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Dollars in thousands) LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
2005 2004 ---------- ---------- DEPOSITS: Noninterest bearing $ 667,328 $ 630,882 Interest bearing 3,090,429 3,058,979 ---------- ---------- TOTAL DEPOSITS 3,757,757 3,689,861 ---------- ---------- Short-term borrowings 314,074 278,231 Long-term debt 714,784 795,793 OTHER LIABILITIES: Accrued interest payable 8,943 6,411 Other 82,060 79,727 ---------- ---------- TOTAL OTHER LIABILITIES 91,003 86,138 ---------- ---------- TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,877,618 4,850,023 ---------- ---------- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: Common stock, no par value (20,000,000 shares authorized; 15,271,574 shares issued in 2005 and 15,269,707 issued in 2004) 208,365 208,251 Accumulated other comprehensive income, net (10,143) 12,442 Retained earnings 476,889 433,260 Less: Treasury stock (1,178,948 shares in 2005 and 949,480 shares in 2004) (116,681) (91,392) ---------- ---------- TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 558,430 562,561 ---------- ---------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $5,436,048 $5,412,584 ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 41 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2005 2004 2003 -------- -------- -------- INTEREST INCOME: Interest and fees on loans $223,868 $178,853 $183,929 Interest and dividends on: Obligations of U.S. Government, its agencies and other securities 85,664 86,806 73,753 Obligations of states and political subdivisions 4,486 5,115 6,168 Other interest income 441 219 779 -------- -------- -------- TOTAL INTEREST INCOME 314,459 270,993 264,629 -------- -------- -------- INTEREST EXPENSE: Interest on deposits: Demand and savings deposits 15,091 6,895 8,026 Time deposits 41,808 33,103 40,574 Interest on short-term borrowings 7,508 5,319 2,738 Interest on long-term debt 29,488 13,385 10,654 -------- -------- -------- TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 93,895 58,702 61,992 -------- -------- -------- NET INTEREST INCOME 220,564 212,291 202,637 -------- -------- -------- Provision for loan losses 5,407 8,600 12,595 -------- -------- -------- NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 215,157 203,691 190,042 -------- -------- -------- OTHER INCOME: Income from fiduciary activities 12,034 11,137 10,245 Service charges on deposit accounts 17,853 15,585 14,269 Gain/(loss) on sales of securities 96 (793) (6,060) Other service income 10,753 10,325 21,648 Other 18,969 15,594 15,421 -------- -------- -------- TOTAL OTHER INCOME $ 59,705 $ 51,848 $ 55,523 -------- -------- --------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 42 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (CONTINUED) PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2005 2004 2003 -------- -------- -------- OTHER EXPENSE: Salaries and employee benefits $ 78,498 $ 71,464 $ 68,093 Data processing fees 10,636 8,900 7,819 Fees and service charges 8,723 8,784 7,830 Net occupancy expense of bank premises 8,641 7,024 6,917 Amortization of intangibles 2,548 1,479 3,110 Furniture and equipment expense 5,278 5,749 6,434 Insurance 1,243 1,030 1,090 Marketing 4,197 3,972 3,585 Postage and telephone 4,827 4,482 4,691 State taxes 2,893 2,468 2,518 Other 11,954 10,938 10,289 -------- -------- -------- TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE 139,438 126,290 122,376 -------- -------- -------- INCOME BEFORE FEDERAL INCOME TAXES 135,424 129,249 123,189 Federal income taxes 40,186 37,742 36,311 -------- -------- -------- NET INCOME $ 95,238 $ 91,507 $ 86,878 -------- -------- -------- EARNINGS PER SHARE: BASIC $ 6.68 $ 6.38 $ 6.01 DILUTED $ 6.64 $ 6.32 $ 5.97 -------- -------- --------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 43 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
COMMON STOCK ACCUMULATED ---------------------- OTHER SHARES RETAINED COMPREHENSIVE TREASURY OUTSTANDING AMOUNT EARNINGS INCOME STOCK TOTAL ----------- -------- -------- ------------- ---------- -------- BALANCE,JANUARY 1, 2003 14,481,564 $105,768 $446,300 $ 22,418 $ (65,194) $509,292 ---------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- Treasury stock purchased (92,913) -- -- -- (8,907) (8,907) Treasury stock reissued primarily for stock options exercised 64,396 -- -- -- 5,524 5,524 Cash payment for fractional shares in dividend reinvestment plan (40) (3) -- -- -- (3) Shares issued for stock options 2,020 130 130 Net income -- -- 86,878 -- -- 86,878 Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Unrealized net holding loss on securities available-for-sale, net of income taxes of $(2,725) (5,062) (5,062) Reverse additional minimum liability for pension plan, net of income taxes of $860 1,598 -- 1,598 -------- -------- Total other comprehensive income (3,464) -------- Comprehensive income 83,414 Cash dividends: Corporation at $3.209 per share -- -- (46,409) -- -- (46,409) ---------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- BALANCE,DECEMBER 31, 2003 14,455,027 $105,895 $486,769 $ 18,954 $ (68,577) $543,041 ---------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- Treasury stock purchased (214,681) -- -- -- (23,699) (23,699) Treasury stock reissued primarily for stock options exercised 79,626 -- -- -- 7,323 7,323 Cash payment for fractional shares in dividend reinvestment plan (25) (3) -- -- -- (3) Shares issued for stock options 2,052 144 -- -- -- 144 Stock dividend at 5% 102,464 (96,025) (6,439) -- Cash payment for fractional shares for 5% stock dividend (1,772) (249) (249) Net income -- -- 91,507 -- 91,507 Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Unrealized net holding loss on securities available-for-sale, net of income taxes of $(3,506) (6,512) (6,512) -------- -------- Total other comprehensive income (6,512) -------- Comprehensive income 84,995 Cash dividends: Corporation at $3.414 per share -- -- (48,991) -- -- (48,991) ---------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2004 14,320,227 $208,251 $433,260 $ 12,442 $ (91,392) $562,561 ---------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- TREASURY STOCK PURCHASED (281,360) -- -- -- (29,978) (29,978) TREASURY STOCK REISSUED PRIMARILY FOR STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISED 51,892 -- -- -- 4,689 4,689 CASH PAYMENT FOR FRACTIONAL SHARES IN DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN (50) (3) -- -- -- (3) SHARES ISSUED FOR STOCK OPTIONS 1,917 117 117 NET INCOME -- -- 95,238 -- -- 95,238 OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX: UNREALIZED NET HOLDING LOSS ON SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE, NET OF INCOME TAXES OF $(12,161) (22,585) (22,585) -------- -------- TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (22,585) -------- COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 72,653 CASH DIVIDENDS: CORPORATION AT $3.62 PER SHARE -- -- (51,609) -- -- (51,609) ---------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- BALANCE,DECEMBER 31, 2005 14,092,626 $208,365 $476,889 $(10,143) $(116,681) $558,430 ---------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 44 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (Dollars in thousands)
2005 2004 2003 --------- --------- ----------- OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income $ 95,238 $ 91,507 $ 86,878 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Provision for loan losses 5,407 8,600 12,595 Amortization of loan fees and costs, net (3,809) (3,336) (4,882) Provision for depreciation of premises and equipment 5,641 5,436 5,866 Amortization of intangible assets 2,548 1,479 3,110 Accretion of investment securities (2,444) (1,756) (6,063) Deferred income tax expense (benefit) 1,990 (2,542) (3,661) Realized investment security (gains) losses (96) 793 6,060 Changes in assets and liabilities: Increase in other assets (24,431) (20,219) (10,463) Increase in other liabilities 958 6,750 9,767 --------- --------- ----------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 81,002 86,712 99,207 --------- --------- ----------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities 131,794 58,438 754,474 Proceeds from maturities of securities: Held-to-maturity 63,914 52,741 632,005 Available-for-sale 345,660 384,087 3,013,785 Purchase of securities: Held-to-maturity (187,420) (62,659) (341,656) Available-for-sale (113,198) (364,215) (4,672,909) Net increase in other investments (4,268) (3,759) (1,567) Net decrease in interest bearing deposits with other banks 1,796 50 -- Net increase in loans (53,600) (171,784) (45,215) Proceeds from loans sold with branch office 5,273 -- -- Cash paid for acquisition, net (39,227) (34,693) -- Purchases of premises and equipment, net (8,193) (6,047) (3,878) --------- --------- ----------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES 142,531 (147,841) (664,961) --------- --------- ----------- FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Net (decrease) increase in deposits (55,491) 103,273 (80,886) Deposits sold with branch office (12,419) -- -- Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings 35,843 (256,756) 327,881 Cash payment for fractional shares of common stock (3) (252) (3) Exercise of stock options 117 144 130 Purchase of treasury stock, net (25,289) (16,376) (3,383) Proceeds from long-term debt 326,040 477,915 475,000 Repayment of long-term debt (428,689) (206,541) (176,249) Cash dividends paid (51,498) (48,231) (45,742) --------- --------- ----------- NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES (211,389) 53,176 496,748 --------- --------- ----------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 12,144 (7,953) (69,006) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 161,829 169,782 238,788 --------- --------- ----------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 173,973 $ 161,829 $ 169,782 --------- --------- ----------- SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE Summary of business acquisition: Fair value of assets acquired $ 185,372 $ 252,687 Cash paid for the purchase of financial institutions (52,500) (46,638) Fair value of liabilities assumed (161,241) (232,707) --------- --------- Goodwill recognized $ (28,369) $ (26,658) --------- ---------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 45 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements: PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Park National Corporation ("Park" or the "Corporation") and all of its subsidiaries. Material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation. INVESTMENT SECURITIES Investment securities are classified upon acquisition into one of three categories: Held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading (see Note 4). Held-to-maturity securities are those securities that the Corporation has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are recorded at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are those securities that would be available to be sold in the future in response to the Corporation's liquidity needs, changes in market interest rates, and asset-liability management strategies, among others. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses excluded from earnings and are included in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Corporation did not hold any trading securities. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are evaluated quarterly for potential other-than-temporary impairment. Management considers the facts of each security including the nature of the security, the amount and duration of the loss, credit quality of the issuer, the expectations for that security's performance and Park's intent and ability to hold the security until recovery. A decline in value that is considered to be other-than-temporary is recorded as a charge to earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Other investment securities (as shown on the balance sheet) consist of stock investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank. The fair values of these investments are the same as their amortized costs. Gains and losses realized on the sale of investment securities have been accounted for on the trade date in the year of sale on a specific identification basis. MORTGAGE LOANS HELD-FOR-SALE Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, determined using an aggregate basis. Write-downs to fair value are recognized as a charge to earnings at the time the decline in value occurs. Mortgage loans held-for-sale were $5.8 million at December 31, 2005, and $2.9 million at December 31, 2004. These amounts are included in loans on the balance sheet. The Corporation enters into forward commitments to sell mortgage loans to reduce market risk on mortgage loans in the process of origination and mortgage loans held-for-sale. Gains and losses resulting from sales of mortgage loans are recognized when the respective loans are sold to investors. Gains and losses are determined by the difference between the selling price and the carrying amount of the loans sold, net of discounts collected or paid and considering a normal servicing rate. Fees received from borrowers to guarantee the funding of mortgage loans held-for-sale and fees paid to investors to ensure the ultimate sale of such mortgage loans are recognized as income or expense when the loans are sold or when it becomes evident that the commitment will not be used. LOANS Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, are reported at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for any charge-offs, any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, and any unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Interest income is reported on the interest method and includes amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 90 days past due and interest is considered a loss, unless the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans are generally not placed on nonaccrual status, but are charged-off when they are 120 days past due. For loans which are on nonaccrual status, it is Park's policy to reverse interest previously accrued on the loan against interest income. Interest on such loans is thereafter recorded on a cash basis and is included in earnings only when actually received in cash and when full payment of principal is no longer doubtful. The delinquency status of a loan is based on contractual terms and not on how recently payments have been received. Loans are removed from nonaccrual status when loan payments have been received to cure the delinquency status and the loan is deemed to be well-secured by management. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES The allowance for loan losses is that amount believed adequate to absorb probable credit losses in the loan portfolio based on management's evaluation of various factors including overall growth in the loan portfolio, an analysis of individual loans, prior and current loss experience and current economic conditions. A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on management's periodic evaluation of these and other pertinent factors. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," as amended by SFAS No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosure" requires an allowance to be established as a component of the allowance for loan losses for certain loans when it is probable that all amounts due pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan will not be collected, and the recorded investment in the loan exceeds the fair value. Fair value is measured using either the present value of expected future cash flows based upon the initial effective interest rate on the loan, the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Commercial loans are individually risk graded. Where appropriate, reserves are allocated to individual loans based on management's estimate of the borrower's ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral and other sources of cash flow. Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment loans, residential mortgage loans and automobile leases are not individually risk graded. Reserves are established for each pool of loans based on historical loan loss experience, current economic conditions and loan delinquency. INCOME RECOGNITION Income earned by the Corporation and its subsidiaries is recognized on the accrual basis of accounting, except for late charges on loans which are recognized as income when they are collected. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is generally provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever are the shorter periods. Upon the sale or other disposal of the assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred while renewals and improvements are capitalized. 46 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The range of depreciable lives that premises and equipment are being depreciated over are: Buildings 5 to 50 Years Equipment, furniture and fixtures 3 to 20 Years Leasehold improvements 1 to 10 Years
Buildings that are currently placed in service are depreciated over 20 to 30 years. Equipment, furniture and fixtures that are currently placed in service are depreciated over 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the life of the leases which range from 1 to 10 years. OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of cost or fair market value (which is not in excess of estimated net realizable value) and consists of property acquired through foreclosure, and real estate held for sale. Subsequent to acquisition, allowances for losses are established if carrying values exceed fair value less estimated costs to sell. Costs relating to development and improvement of such properties are capitalized (not in excess of fair value less estimated costs to sell), whereas costs relating to holding the properties are charged to expense. MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS When Park sells mortgage loans with servicing rights retained, the total cost of the mortgage loan is allocated to the servicing rights and the loans based on their relative fair values. The servicing rights capitalized are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated servicing income. Capitalized mortgage servicing rights are included in other assets and totaled $10.7 million at December 31, 2005 and $9.5 million at December 31, 2004. The estimated fair values of capitalized mortgage servicing rights are $12.2 million and $9.5 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is determined by discounting estimated future cash flows from the servicing assets, using market discount rates, and using expected future prepayment rates. In 2005, 2004 and 2003, Park capitalized $2.0 million, $1.97 million and $7.88 million in mortgage servicing rights, respectively. In 2005, 2004 and 2003, Park's amortization of mortgage servicing rights was $2.1 million, $1.95 million and $4.24 million, respectively. Generally, mortgage servicing rights are capitalized and amortized on an individual sold loan basis. When a sold mortgage loan is paid off, the related mortgage servicing rights are fully amortized. Mortgage servicing rights increased by $1,298,000 in 2005 as a result of the acquisition of First Clermont Bank on January 3, 2005 and also increased by $315,000 in 2004 as a result of the acquisition of First Federal Bancorp, Inc. on December 31, 2004. Mortgage servicing rights are assessed for impairment periodically, based on fair value, with any impairment recognized through a valuation allowance. Fees received for servicing mortgage loans owned by investors are based on a percentage of the outstanding monthly principal balance of such loans and are included in income as loan payments are received. The cost of servicing loans is charged to expense as incurred. Park serviced sold mortgage loans of $1,403 million at December 31, 2005, $1,266 million at December 31, 2004 and $1,166 million at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2005, $87 million of the serviced mortgage loans were sold with recourse compared to $102 million at December 31, 2004. Management closely monitors the delinquency rates on the mortgage loans sold with recourse. At December 31, 2005, management determined that no liability was deemed necessary for these loans. LEASE FINANCING Leases of equipment, automobiles, and aircraft to customers generally are direct leases in which the Corporation's subsidiaries have acquired the equipment, automobiles, or aircraft with no outside financing. Such leases are accounted for as direct financing leases for financial reporting purposes. Under the direct financing method, a receivable is recorded for the total amount of the lease payments to be received. Unearned lease income, representing the excess of the sum of the aggregate rentals of the equipment, automobiles or aircraft over its cost is included in income over the term of the lease under the interest method. The estimated residual values of leases are established at inception by determining the estimated residual value for the equipment, automobiles, or aircraft from the particular industry leasing guide. Management re-evaluates the estimated residual values of leases on a quarterly basis from review of the leasing guides and charges operating expense for any write-down of the estimated residual values of leases. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination. Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that have no physical property but represent some future economic benefit to their owner and are capable of being sold or exchanged on their own or in combination with a related asset or liability. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized to expense, but are subject to annual impairment tests. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives (such as core deposit intangibles) are amortized to expense over their estimated useful life. Management considers several factors when performing the annual impairment tests on goodwill. The factors considered include the operating results for the particular Park subsidiary bank for the past year and the operating results budgeted for the current year, the purchase prices being paid for financial institutions in the Midwest, the deposit and loan totals of the Park subsidiary bank and the economic conditions in the markets served by the Park subsidiary bank. The following table reflects the activity in goodwill and other intangible assets for the years 2005 and 2004. (See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details on the acquisitions of First Federal Bancorp, Inc. ("First Federal") and First Clermont Bank ("First Clermont") and the sale of the Roseville branch office.)
CORE DEPOSIT GOODWILL INTANGIBLES TOTAL -------- ------------ ------- (IN THOUSANDS) December 31, 2003 $ 7,529 $ 5,429 $12,958 ------- ------- ------- Amortization -- (1,479) (1,479) First Federal acquisition 26,658 2,750 29,408 ------- ------- ------- DECEMBER 31, 2004 $34,187 $ 6,700 $40,887 ------- ------- ------- FIRST CLERMONT ACQUISITION 28,369 3,664 32,033 SALE OF BRANCH OFFICE (860) (324) (1,184) AMORTIZATION -- (2,548) (2,548) ------- ------- ------- DECEMBER 31,2005 $61,696 $ 7,492 $69,188 ------- ------- -------
Park evaluates goodwill for impairment during the first quarter of each year. A determination has been made each year that goodwill was not impaired. The balance of goodwill was $61.7 million at December 31, 2005. This goodwill balance is located at three subsidiary banks of Park. The subsidiary banks are The Park National Bank ($28.4 million), Century National Bank ($25.8 million) and The Security National Bank and Trust Co. ($7.5 million). Goodwill and other intangible assets (as shown on the balance sheet) totaled $69,188,000 at December 31, 2005 and $40,887,000 at December 31, 2004. The core deposit intangibles are being amortized to expense principally on the straight-line method, over periods ranging from six to twelve years. The amortization period for the First Federal and First Clermont acquisitions is six years. Core deposit intangible amortization expense was $2,548,000 in 2005, $1,479,000 in 2004 and $3,110,000 in 2003. 47 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The accumulated amortization of core deposit intangibles was $11.1 million at December 31, 2005 and $8.6 million at December 31, 2004. The expected core deposit intangible amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows: (IN THOUSANDS) 2006 $2,469 2007 1,860 2008 1,349 2009 1,069 2010 745 ------ TOTAL $7,492 ======
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Cash and cash equivalents include cash and cash items, amounts due from banks and money market instruments. Generally money market instruments are purchased and sold for one day periods. Net cash provided by operating activities reflects cash payments as follows:
DECEMBER 31, 2005 2004 2003 - ------------ ------- ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings $91,408 $58,986 $63,608 Income taxes paid $37,146 $41,884 $36,400
INCOME TAXES The Corporation accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability approach. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. STOCK DIVIDEND Park's Board of Directors approved a 5% stock dividend in November 2004. The additional shares resulting from the dividend were distributed on December 15, 2004 to stockholders of record as of December 1, 2004. The consolidated financial statements, notes and other references to share and per share data have been retroactively restated for the stock dividend. TREASURY STOCK The purchase of Park's common stock is recorded at cost. At the date of retirement or subsequent reissuance, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock. STOCK OPTIONS At December 31, 2005, Park has one incentive stock option plan under which grants of options can be made. This plan is described more fully in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Park accounts for this plan under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (APB 25) and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the grant date. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if Park had applied the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation," to stock-based employee compensation.
DECEMBER 31, 2005 2004 2003 - ------------ ------- ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) Net income as reported $95,238 $91,507 $86,878 Pro-forma net income 91,574 88,284 84,989 ------- ------- ------- Basic earnings per share as reported $ 6.68 $ 6.38 $ 6.01 Pro-forma basic earnings per share 6.42 6.15 5.88 ------- ------- ------- Diluted earnings per share as reported 6.64 6.32 5.97 Pro-forma diluted earnings per share 6.38 6.09 5.84
On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced the adoption of a new rule that delayed the date for compliance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R was previously scheduled to become mandatory for public entities, such as Park, that do not file as small business issuers as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The SEC's new rule allowed these public entities to implement SFAS No. 123R at the beginning of the next fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123R prohibits companies from using APB 25 for the accounting of stock options and requires that grants of stock options be charged to expense. Companies were permitted to adopt SFAS No. 123R earlier than the beginning of their next fiscal year, but the management of Park elected to adopt SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods. The "modified prospective" method recognizes compensation expense beginning with the effective date for all stock options granted after the effective date and for all stock options that become vested after the effective date. The "modified retrospective" method includes the requirements of the "modified prospective" method described above, but also permits entities to restate prior period results based on the amounts previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes of pro-forma disclosures. Park has elected to adopt SFAS No. 123R using the "modified prospective" method and accordingly will not restate prior period results. The management of Park does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The provisions of this statement require that derivative instruments be carried at fair value on the balance sheet. The statement continues to allow derivative instruments to be used to hedge various risks and sets forth specific criteria to be used to determine when hedge accounting can be used. The statement also provided for offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of both the derivative and the hedged asset or liability to be recognized in earnings in the same period; however, any changes in fair value or cash flow that represent the ineffective portion of a hedge are required to be recognized in earnings and cannot be deferred. For derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges, changes in fair value are required to be recognized in earnings. The provisions of this statement became effective for quarterly and annual reporting beginning January 1, 2001. The Corporation did not use any derivative instruments in 2005, 2004 and 2003 and as a result the adoption of this statement has had no impact on the Corporation's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS MEANING OF OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENT: In November 2005, FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 115-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments." The FSP provides additional guidance on when an investment in a debt or equity security should be considered impaired and when that impairment should be considered other-than-temporary and recognized as a loss in earnings. Specifically, the guidance clarifies that an investor should recognize an impairment loss no later than when the impairment is deemed other-than-temporary, even if a decision to sell has not been made. The FSP also requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The guidance in this FSP must be applied to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The management of Park does not expect that the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. 48 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND ERROR CORRECTIONS: In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections," which changes the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. This statement requires retrospective application to prior period financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impractical to determine either the specific period (or the cumulative effect) of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes made in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The management of Park does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. 2. ORGANIZATION AND ACQUISITIONS Park National Corporation is a multi-bank holding company headquartered in Newark, Ohio. Through its banking subsidiaries, The Park National Bank (PNB), The Richland Trust Company (RTC), Century National Bank (CNB), The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon (FKNB), United Bank, N.A. (UB), Second National Bank (SNB), The Security National Bank and Trust Co. (SEC), and The Citizens National Bank of Urbana (CIT), Park is engaged in a general commercial banking and trust business, primarily in Ohio. A wholly owned subsidiary of Park, Guardian Finance Company (GFC) began operating in May 1999. GFC is a consumer finance company located in Central Ohio. PNB operates through three banking divisions with the Park National Division headquartered in Newark, Ohio, the Fairfield National Division headquartered in Lancaster, Ohio and the First Clermont Division headquartered in Milford, Ohio. FKNB operates through two banking divisions with the First-Knox National Division headquartered in Mount Vernon, Ohio and the Farmers and Savings Division headquartered in Loudonville, Ohio. SEC also operates through two banking divisions with the Security National Division headquartered in Springfield, Ohio and The Unity National Division (formerly The Third Savings and Loan Company) headquartered in Piqua, Ohio. All of the banking subsidiaries and their respective divisions provide the following principal services: the acceptance of deposits for demand, savings, and time accounts; commercial, industrial, consumer and real estate lending, including installment loans, credit cards, home equity lines of credit and commercial and auto leasing; trust services; cash management; safe deposit operations; electronic funds transfers; and a variety of additional banking-related services. See Note 20 for financial information on the Corporation's banking subsidiaries. On January 3, 2005, Park acquired all of the stock of First Clermont Bank of Milford, Ohio for $52,500,000 in an all cash transaction accounted for as a purchase. Immediately following Park's acquisition, First Clermont merged with Park's subsidiary, The Park National Bank. The goodwill recognized as a result of this acquisition was $28,369,000. The fair value of the acquired assets of First Clermont was $185,372,000 and the fair value of the liabilities assumed was $161,241,000 at January 3, 2005. On December 31, 2004, Park acquired First Federal Bancorp, Inc., a savings and loan holding company headquartered in Zanesville, Ohio, in an all cash transaction accounted for as a purchase. The stockholders of First Federal received $13.25 in cash for each outstanding common share of First Federal common stock. Park paid a total of $46,638,000 to the stockholders of First Federal. The savings and loan subsidiary of First Federal, First Federal Savings Bank of Eastern Ohio, merged with Century National Bank. The goodwill recognized as a result of this acquisition was $26,658,000. The fair value of the acquired assets of First Federal was $252,687,000 and the fair value of the liabilities assumed was $232,707,000 at December 31, 2004. On February 11, 2005, Park's subsidiary Century National Bank, sold its Roseville, Ohio, branch office. The Roseville branch office was acquired in connection with the acquisition of First Federal on December 31, 2004. The Federal Reserve Board required that the Roseville branch office be sold as a condition of their approval of the merger transactions involving Park and First Federal. The deposits sold with the Roseville branch office totaled $12,419,000 and the loans sold with the branch office totaled $5,273,000. Century National Bank received a premium of $1,184,000 from the sale of the deposits. 3. RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS The Corporation's banking subsidiaries are required to maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The average required reserve balance was approximately $37,674,000 and $30,827,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. No other compensating balance arrangements were in existence at year end. 4. INVESTMENT SECURITIES The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities are shown below. Management evaluates the investment securities on a quarterly basis for permanent impairment. No impairment charges have been deemed necessary in 2005 and 2004.
GROSS GROSS UNREALIZED UNREALIZED AMORTIZED HOLDING HOLDING ESTIMATED COST GAINS LOSSES FAIR VALUE ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) 2005: SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE Obligations of U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government agencies $ 998 $ -- $ 2 $ 996 Obligations of states and political subdivisions 66,181 1,740 15 67,906 U.S. Government agencies' asset-backed securities and other asset-backed securities 1,356,233 1,823 19,629 1,338,427 Other equity securities 1,543 527 48 2,022 ---------- ------ ------- ---------- TOTAL $1,424,955 $4,090 $19,694 $1,409,351 ========== ====== ======= ========== 2005: SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY Obligations of states and political subdivisions $ 17,430 $ 308 $ -- $ 17,738 U.S. Government agencies' asset-backed securities and other asset-backed securities 178,523 2 5,838 172,687 ---------- ------ ------- ---------- TOTAL $ 195,953 $ 310 $ 5,838 $ 190,425 ========== ====== ======= ==========
Other investment securities (as shown on the balance sheet) consist of stock investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank. Park owned $52.1 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $5.9 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock at December 31, 2005. Park owned $47.1 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $4.4 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock at December 31, 2004. The fair values of these investments are the same as their amortized costs. Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, represents an other-than-temporary impairment. The unrealized losses relate primarily to the impact of increases in market interest rates on U.S. Government agencies' asset-backed securities. Should the impairment of any of these securities become other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is identified. 49 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2005, were as follows:
LESS THAN 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS OR LONGER TOTAL ----------------------- ------------------- ----------------------- FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES ---------- ---------- ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) 2005: SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE Obligations of U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government agencies $ 996 $ 2 $ -- $ -- $ 996 $ 2 Obligations of states and political subdivisions 346 4 474 11 820 15 U.S.Government agencies' asset- backed securities and other asset- backed securities 1,244,306 19,272 4,338 357 1,248,644 19,629 Other equity securities -- -- 152 48 152 48 ---------- ------- ------ ---- ---------- ------- TOTAL $1,245,648 $19,278 $4,964 $416 $1,250,612 $19,694 ========== ======= ====== ==== ========== ======= 2005: SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY U.S.Government agencies' asset- backed securities and other asset- backed securities $ 172,591 $ 5,838 $ -- $ -- $ 172,591 $ 5,838 ---------- ------- ------ ---- ---------- -------
Investment securities at December 31, 2004, were as follows:
GROSS GROSS UNREALIZED UNREALIZED AMORTIZED HOLDING HOLDING ESTIMATED COST GAINS LOSSES FAIR VALUE ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) 2004: SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE Obligations of U.S.Treasury and other U.S.Government agencies $ 15,201 $ 8 $ 3 $ 15,206 Obligations of states and political subdivisions 81,738 3,851 23 85,566 U.S.Government agencies' asset-backed securities and other asset-backed securities 1,685,760 16,043 1,225 1,700,578 Other equity securities 1,025 501 11 1,515 ---------- ------- ------ ---------- TOTAL $1,783,724 $20,403 $1,262 $1,802,865 ========== ======= ====== ========== 2004: SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY Obligations of states and political subdivisions $ 18,173 $ 703 $ -- $ 18,876 U.S.Government agencies' asset-backed securities and other asset-backed securities 54,274 470 7 54,737 ---------- ------- ------ ---------- TOTAL $ 72,447 $ 1,173 $ 7 $ 73,613 ========== ======= ====== ==========
Securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2004, were as follows:
LESS THAN 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS OR LONGER TOTAL --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES -------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) 2004: SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE Obligations of U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government agencies $ 5,198 $ 3 $ -- $ -- $ 5,198 $ 3 Obligations of states and political subdivisions 1,019 23 -- -- 1,019 23 U.S.Government agencies' asset- backed securities and other asset- backed securities 208,643 363 24,136 862 232,779 1,225 Other equity securities 189 11 -- -- 189 11 -------- ---- ------- ---- -------- ------ TOTAL $215,049 $400 $24,136 $862 $239,185 $1,262 ======== ==== ======= ==== ======== ====== 2004: SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY U.S.Government agencies' asset- backed securities and other asset- backed securities $ 4,715 $ 7 $ -- $ -- $ 4,715 $ 7 -------- ---- ------- ---- -------- ------
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments in debt securities at December 31, 2005, are shown below by contractual maturity or the expected call date, except for asset-backed securities which are shown based on expected principal repayments. The average yield is computed on a tax equivalent basis using a thirty-five percent tax rate and is based on the amortized cost of the securities.
WEIGHTED AMORTIZED ESTIMATED AVERAGE AVERAGE COST FAIR VALUE MATURITY YIELD ---------- ---------- ----------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE U.S.Treasury and agencies' notes: Due within one year $ 998 $ 996 0.20 YEARS 3.36% ---------- ---------- ----------- ---- Obligations of states and political subdivisions: Due within one year 17,879 18,072 0.51 YEARS 7.07% Due one through five years 44,355 45,754 2.21 YEARS 7.09% Due five through ten years 2,827 2,972 5.78 YEARS 7.07% Due over ten years 1,120 1,108 17.04 YEARS 8.23% ---------- ---------- ----------- ---- TOTAL $ 66,181 $ 67,906 2.15 YEARS 7.10% ========== ========== =========== ==== U.S.Government agencies' asset-backed securities and other asset-backed securities: Due within one year $ 208,985 $ 206,247 0.53 YEARS 4.86% Due one through five years 613,271 605,237 2.88 YEARS 4.85% Due five through ten years 421,192 415,674 7.23 YEARS 4.78% Due over ten years 112,785 111,269 11.08 YEARS 4.71% ---------- ---------- ----------- ---- TOTAL $1,356,233 $1,338,427 4.55 YEARS 4.82% ========== ========== =========== ==== SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY Obligations of states and political subdivisions: Due within one year $ 6,278 $ 6,318 0.52 YEARS 6.42% Due one through five years 11,152 11,420 2.40 YEARS 6.58% ---------- ---------- ----------- ---- TOTAL $ 17,430 $ 17,738 1.72 YEARS 6.52% ========== ========== =========== ==== U.S.Government agencies' asset-backed securities and other asset-backed securities: Due within one year $ 27,534 $ 26,634 0.51 YEARS 4.77% Due one through five years 35,235 34,083 2.41 YEARS 4.73% Due five through ten years 81,882 79,204 7.82 YEARS 4.76% Due over ten years 33,872 32,766 11.01 YEARS 4.77% ---------- ---------- ----------- ---- TOTAL $ 178,523 $ 172,687 6.23 YEARS 4.76% ========== ========== =========== ====
Investment securities having a book value of $1,503 million and $1,367 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were pledged to collateralize government and trust department deposits in accordance with federal and state requirements and to secure repurchase agreements sold, and as collateral for Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advance borrowings. At December 31, 2005, $699 million was pledged for government and trust department deposits, $659 million was pledged to secure repurchase agreements and $145 million was pledged as collateral for FHLB advance borrowings. At December 31, 2004, $530 million was pledged for government and trust department deposits, $441 million was pledged to secure repurchase agreements and $396 million was pledged as collateral for FHLB advance borrowings. 50 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In 2005, 2004 and 2003, gross gains of $97,000, $140,000 and $1,507,000, and gross losses of $1,000, $933,000 and $7,567,000 were realized, respectively. The tax expense related to the net securities gains was $34,000 in 2005 and the tax benefits related to net securities losses were $278,000 in 2004 and $2,121,000 in 2003. 5. LOANS The composition of the loan portfolio is as follows:
DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 - ----------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Commercial, financial and agricultural $ 512,636 $ 469,382 Real estate: Construction 193,185 155,326 Residential 1,287,438 1,190,275 Commercial 823,354 752,428 Consumer, net 494,975 505,151 Leases, net 16,524 48,046 ---------- ---------- TOTAL LOANS $3,328,112 $3,120,608 ========== ==========
Under the Corporation's credit policies and practices, all nonaccrual and restructured commercial, financial, agricultural, construction and commercial real estate loans meet the definition of impaired loans under SFAS No. 114 and 118. Impaired loans as defined by SFAS No. 114 and 118 exclude certain consumer loans, residential real estate loans and lease financing classified as nonaccrual. The majority of the loans deemed impaired were evaluated using the fair value of the collateral as the measurement method. Nonaccrual and restructured loans are summarized as follows:
DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 - ----------- ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Impaired loans: Nonaccrual $ 9,308 $12,441 Restructured 7,441 5,461 Total impaired loans 16,749 17,902 Other nonaccrual loans 5,614 5,432 ------- ------- TOTAL NONACCRUAL AND RESTRUCTURED LOANS $22,363 $23,334 ======= =======
The allowance for credit losses related to impaired loans at December 31, 2005 and 2004, was $1,988,000 and $3,580,000, respectively. All impaired loans for both periods were subject to a related allowance for credit losses. The average balance of impaired loans was $19,557,000, $21,003,000 and $21,397,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized after all past due and current principal payments have been made, and collectibility is no longer doubtful. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Corporation recognized $490,000, $721,000 and $845,000, respectively, of interest income on impaired loans. The Corporation received cash payments for interest related to these loans of $553,000 in 2005, $752,000 in 2004 and $546,000 in 2003. Certain of the Corporation's executive officers, directors and their affiliates are loan customers of the Corporation's banking subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, loans aggregating approximately $130,116,000 and $120,917,000, respectively, were outstanding to such parties. During 2005, $37,792,000 of new loans were made and repayments totaled $28,593,000. These loans were made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with other persons and involve no unusual risk of collectibility. 6. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:
2005 2004 2003 -------- -------- -------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Balance, January 1 $ 68,328 $ 63,142 $ 62,028 Allowance for loan losses of acquired bank 1,849 4,450 -- Provision for loan losses 5,407 8,600 12,595 Losses charged to the reserve (13,389) (15,173) (18,036) Recoveries 7,499 7,309 6,555 -------- -------- -------- BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 $ 69,694 $ 68,328 $ 63,142 ======== ======== ========
7. INVESTMENT IN FINANCING LEASES The following is a summary of the components of the Corporation's affiliates' net investment in direct financing leases:
DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 - ----------- ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Total minimum payments to be received $12,987 $38,606 Estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased property 4,562 11,953 Less unearned income (1,368) (2,513) ------- ------- TOTAL $16,181 $48,046 ======= =======
Minimum lease payments, in thousands, to be received as of December 31, 2005 are:
(IN THOUSANDS) 2006 $ 3,752 2007 2,776 2008 2,401 2009 2,392 2010 1,079 Thereafter 587 ------- TOTAL $12,987 =======
8. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT The major categories of premises and equipment and accumulated depreciation are summarized as follows:
DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 - ----------- -------- -------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Land $ 14,292 $ 13,258 Buildings 59,347 54,256 Equipment, furniture and fixtures 53,630 52,284 Leasehold improvements 3,624 3,248 -------- -------- TOTAL 130,893 123,046 -------- -------- Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (83,721) (79,867) -------- -------- PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET $ 47,172 $ 43,179 ======== ========
Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $5,641,000, $5,436,000 and $5,866,000 for the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Corporation and its subsidiaries lease certain premises and equipment accounted for as operating leases. The following is a schedule of the future minimum rental payments required for the next five years under such leases with initial terms in excess of one year: (IN THOUSANDS) 2006 $1,758 2007 1,620 2008 1,464 2009 1,158 2010 703 Thereafter 833 ------ TOTAL $7,536 ======
Rent expense amounted to $1,915,000, $1,362,000 and $1,307,000, for the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 51 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 9. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS Short-term borrowings are as follows:
DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 - ----------- -------- -------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased $246,502 $192,483 Federal Home Loan Bank advances 60,000 78,228 Other short-term borrowings 7,572 7,520 -------- -------- TOTAL SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS $314,074 $278,231 ======== ========
The outstanding balances for all short-term borrowings as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands) and the weighted-average interest rates as of year-end and paid during each of the years then ended are as follows:
REPURCHASE DEMAND AGREEMENTS FEDERAL NOTES AND FEDERAL HOME LOAN DUE U.S. FUNDS BANK TREASURY PURCHASED ADVANCES AND OTHER ----------- --------- --------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 2005: ENDING BALANCE $246,502 $ 60,000 $7,572 HIGHEST MONTH-END BALANCE 246,502 170,000 8,583 AVERAGE DAILY BALANCE 194,157 94,264 3,421 WEIGHTED-AVERAGE INTEREST RATE: AS OF YEAR-END 2.94% 4.20% 4.16% PAID DURING THE YEAR 2.14% 3.46% 2.93% -------- -------- ------ 2004: Ending balance $192,483 $ 78,228 $7,520 Highest month-end balance 354,195 160,050 7,520 Average daily balance 323,978 74,043 3,278 Weighted-average interest rate: As of year-end 1.29% 2.31% 2.25% Paid during the year 1.17% 2.01% 1.13% -------- -------- ------ 2003: Ending balance $367,082 $145,050 $4,627 Highest month-end balance 777,707 145,050 9,914 Average daily balance 495,704 16,011 3,613 Weighted-average interest rate: As of year-end 1.09% 1.01% 1.00% Paid during the year 0.50% 1.24% 1.12% -------- -------- ------
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances were collateralized by investment securities owned by the Corporation's subsidiary banks and by residential mortgage loans pledged under a blanket agreement by the Corporation's subsidiary banks. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the amount of investment securities that are pledged. At December 31, 2005, $867 million of residential mortgage loans were pledged under a blanket agreement to the FHLB by Park's subsidiary banks. At December 31, 2004, $797 million of residential mortgage loans were pledged to the FHLB. 10. LONG-TERM DEBT Long-term debt is listed below:
2005 2004 --------------------- --------------------- OUTSTANDING AVERAGE Outstanding Average DECEMBER 31 BALANCE RATE Balance Rate - ----------- ----------- ------- ----------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) TOTAL FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES BY YEAR OF MATURITY: 2005 $ -- -- $ 22,300 5.73% 2006 113,268 4.17% 187,581 2.65% 2007 41,243 4.02% 188,189 2.83% 2008 122,110 4.20% 117,379 4.03% 2009 6,115 3.93% 73,510 4.98% 2010 17,404 5.72% 15,951 5.86% Thereafter 79,644 4.54% 5,883 4.58% -------- ---- -------- ---- TOTAL $379,784 4.31% $610,793 3.47% ======== ==== ======== ==== TOTAL BROKER REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS BY YEAR OF MATURITY: 2007 $ 25,000 3.84% $100,000 3.62% 2009 85,000 3.94% 85,000 2.56% 2010 75,000 3.83% -- -- Thereafter 150,000 3.87% -- -- -------- ---- -------- ---- TOTAL $335,000 3.88% $185,000 3.13% ======== ==== ======== ==== TOTAL COMBINED LONG-TERM DEBT BY YEAR OF MATURITY: 2005 $ -- -- $ 22,300 5.73% 2006 113,268 4.17% 187,581 2.65% 2007 66,243 3.95% 288,189 3.10% 2008 122,110 4.20% 117,379 4.03% 2009 91,115 3.94% 158,510 3.68% 2010 92,404 4.19% 15,951 5.86% Thereafter 229,644 4.10% 5,883 4.48% -------- ---- -------- ---- TOTAL $714,784 4.11% $795,793 3.39% ======== ==== ======== ====
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances were collateralized by investment securities owned by the Corporation's subsidiary banks and by residential mortgage loans pledged under a blanket agreement by the Corporation's subsidiary banks. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the amount of investment securities that are pledged. See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the amount of residential mortgage loans that are pledged to the FHLB. 11. STOCK OPTION PLANS The Park National Corporation 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "2005 Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors of Park on January 18, 2005, and was approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 18, 2005. Under the 2005 Plan, 1,500,000 common shares are authorized for delivery upon the exercise of incentive stock options. All of the common shares delivered upon the exercise of incentive stock options granted under the 2005 Plan are to be treasury shares. At December 31, 2005, 1,289,162 options were available for future grants under the 2005 Plan. Under the terms of the 2005 Plan, incentive stock options may be granted at a price not less than the fair market value at the date of the grant, and for an option term of up to five years. No additional incentive stock options may be granted under the 2005 Plan after January 17, 2015. The Park National Corporation 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "1995 Plan") was adopted April 17, 1995, and amended, April 20, 1998 and April 16, 2001. Pursuant to the terms of the 1995 Plan, all of the common shares delivered upon exercise of incentive stock options are to be treasury shares. No incentive stock options may be granted under the 1995 Plan after January 16, 2005. The activity in Park's stock option plans is listed in the following table for the past three years:
STOCK OPTIONS ------------------- WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE PER NUMBER SHARE ------- --------- January 1, 2003 579,816 $ 87.27 Granted 179,125 92.10 Exercised (60,431) 81.41 Forfeited/Expired (78,414) 88.82 ------- ------- December 31, 2003 620,096 89.04 Granted 232,178 109.48 Exercised (75,653) 87.46 Forfeited/Expired (56,513) 91.48 ------- ------- December 31, 2004 720,108 95.60 Granted 228,150 108.40 Exercised (47,509) 85.83 Forfeited/Expired (82,567) 95.23 ------- ------- DECEMBER 31, 2005 818,182 $ 99.78 ======= =======
Range of exercise prices: $35.58 - $154.20 Weighted-average remaining contractual life: 2.8 Years Exercisable at year end: 801,360 Weighted-average exercise price of exercisable options: $99.59
52 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE ------------------------- ------------------------------------ WEIGHTED- AVERAGE WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- OUTSTANDING REMAINING AVERAGE EXERCISABLE AVERAGE RANGE OF AS OF CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE AS OF EXERCISE EXERCISE PRICES 12/31/05 LIFE PRICE 12/31/05 PRICE - ----------------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- $30.00 - $80.00 11,107 0.4 $ 67.87 11,107 $ 67.87 $80.01 - $90.00 202,237 1.1 86.44 202,237 86.44 $90.01 - $100.00 151,885 2.2 91.72 151,885 91.72 $100.01 - $110.00 417,261 3.9 108.11 400,439 108.09 $110.01 - $120.00 12,830 3.5 113.95 12,830 113.95 $120.01 - $160.00 22,862 3.2 126.78 22,862 126.72 ------- --- ------- ------- ------- 818,182 2.8 $ 99.78 801,360 $ 99.59 ======= === ======= ======= =======
The Corporation has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. The alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation," requires the use of option valuation models to value employee stock options. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Corporation's employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 3.77%, 3.36% and 2.74%; a dividend yield of 3.00% for all three years, a volatility factor of the expected market price of the Corporation's common stock of .198%, .175% and .170% and a weighted-average expected option life of 4.0 years for all three years. The weighted-average fair value of options granted were $16.14, $13.88 and $10.55 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 12. BENEFIT PLANS The Corporation has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The plan provides benefits based on an employee's years of service and compensation. The Corporation's funding policy is to contribute annually an amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes using a different actuarial cost method and different assumptions from those used for financial reporting purposes. Using an accrual measurement date of September 30, plan assets for the pension plan are listed below:
2005 2004 ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF PLAN ASSETS: Fair value at beginning of measurement period $37,341 $36,355 Actual return on plan assets 4,303 3,830 Company contributions 9,688 -- Benefits paid (5,001) (2,844) ------- ------- FAIR VALUE AT END OF MEASUREMENT PERIOD $46,331 $37,341 ======= =======
The asset allocation for the defined benefit pension plan as of the measurement date, by asset category, is as follows:
PERCENTAGE OF PLAN ASSETS ------------- ASSET CATEGORY TARGET ALLOCATION 2005 2004 - -------------- ----------------- ---- ---- Equity securities 50% - 100% 82% 84% Fixed income and cash equivalents remaining balance 18% 16% Other -- -- -- --- --- --- TOTAL -- 100% 100% === === ===
The investment policy, as established by the Retirement Plan Committee, is to invest assets per the target allocation stated above. Assets will be reallocated periodically based on the investment strategy of the Retirement Plan Committee. The investment policy is reviewed periodically. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 7.75% in 2005 and 2004. This return is based on the expected return of each of the asset categories, weighted based on the median of the target allocation for each class. Using an actuarial measurement date of September 30, benefit obligation activity is listed as follows:
2005 2004 ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION: Projected benefit obligation at beginning of measurement period $45,169 $39,948 Service cost 2,682 2,502 Interest cost 2,756 2,577 Actuarial loss or (gain) 1,035 2,986 Benefits paid (5,001) (2,844) ------- ------- PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION AT THE END OF MEASUREMENT PERIOD $46,641 $45,169 ======= =======
The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $38,301,000 at September 30, 2005 and $37,167,000 at September 30, 2004. The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at September 30, were as follows:
2005 2004 ---- ---- Discount rate 5.96% 6.00% Rate of compensation increase 3.50% 3.75%
The estimated future pension benefit payments reflecting expected future service for the next ten years are shown below in thousands: 2006 $ 1,164 2007 1,375 2008 1,554 2009 1,737 2010 1,962 2011 - 2015 17,051 ------- TOTAL $24,843 =======
The following table displays the funded status of the defined benefit pension plan which is computed by taking the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the projected benefit obligation at the measurement date of September 30. The following table also provides information on the prepaid or accrued benefit cost at September 30:
2005 2004 ------ ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Funded status $ (310) $(7,828) Unrecognized prior service cost 238 250 Unrecognized net actuarial loss 9,956 10,435 ------ ------- PREPAID BENEFIT COST $9,884 $ 2,857 ====== =======
Using an actuarial measurement date of September 30, components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
2005 2004 2003 ------- ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST: Service cost $ 2,682 $ 2,502 $ 2,095 Interest cost 2,756 2,577 2,347 Expected return on plan assets (3,334) (2,789) (2,138) Amortization of prior service cost 12 12 12 Recognized net actuarial loss/(gain) 545 497 339 ------- ------- ------- BENEFIT COST $ 2,661 $ 2,799 $ 2,655 ======= ======= =======
53 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, are listed below:
2005 2004 ---- ---- Discount rate 6.00% 6.25% Rate of compensation increase 3.75% 4.00% Expected long-term return on plan assets 7.75% 7.75%
The Corporation has a voluntary salary deferral plan covering substantially all of the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Eligible employees may contribute a portion of their compensation subject to a maximum statutory limitation. The Corporation provides a matching contribution established annually by the Corporation. Contribution expense for the Corporation was $1,763,000, $1,452,000 and $1,393,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Corporation has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) covering certain key officers of the Corporation and its subsidiaries with defined pension benefits in excess of limits imposed by federal tax law. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the accrued benefit cost for this plan totaled $5,620,000 and $4,776,000, respectively. The expense for the Corporation was $744,000, $636,000, and $1,236,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 13. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Corporation's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 - ----------- ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) DEFERRED TAX ASSETS: Allowance for loan losses $24,393 $23,915 Accumulated other comprehensive loss 5,461 -- Intangible assets 3,465 2,743 Deferred compensation 3,545 3,638 Other 3,628 3,270 ------- ------- TOTAL DEFERRED TAX ASSETS $40,492 $33,566 ------- ------- DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES: Lease revenue reporting $ 3,830 $ 6,293 Accumulated other comprehensive income -- 6,700 Deferred investment income 12,170 9,998 Pension Plan 3,400 -- Mortgage servicing rights 3,733 3,333 Other 1,804 830 ------- ------- TOTAL DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES $24,937 $27,154 ------- ------- NET DEFERRED TAX ASSETS $15,555 $ 6,412 ======= =======
The components of the provision for federal income taxes are shown below:
2005 2004 2003 ------- ------- ------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Currently payable $38,196 $40,284 $39,972 Deferred 1,990 (2,542) (3,661) ------- ------- ------- TOTAL $40,186 $37,742 $36,311 ======= ======= =======
The following is a reconcilement of federal income tax expense to the amount computed at the statutory rate of 35% for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:
DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 2003 - ----------- ---- ---- ---- Statutory corporate tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% Changes in rates resulting from: Tax-exempt interest income (1.3%) (1.7%) (2.1%) Tax credits (low income housing) (2.5%) (2.2%) (2.1%) Other (1.5%) (1.9%) (1.3%) ---- ---- ---- EFFECTIVE TAX RATE 29.7% 29.2% 29.5% ==== ==== ====
Park and its subsidiary banks do not pay state income tax to the State of Ohio, but pay a franchise tax based on their year-end equity. The franchise tax expense is included in state tax expense and was $2.9 million in 2005, $2.5 million in 2004 and $2.5 million in 2003. 14. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) Other comprehensive income components and related taxes are shown in the following table for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:
BEFORE-TAX TAX NET-OF-TAX YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 AMOUNT EXPENSE AMOUNT - ---------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 2005: Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities $(34,650) $(12,127) $(22,523) Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income (96) (34) (62) -------- -------- -------- OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(34,746) $(12,161) $(22,585) -------- -------- -------- 2004: Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities $(10,811) $ (3,784) $ (7,027) Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income 793 278 515 -------- -------- -------- OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(10,018) $ (3,506) $ (6,512) -------- -------- -------- 2003: Reverse additional minimum liability for pension plan $ 2,458 $ 860 $ 1,598 Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities (13,847) (4,846) (9,001) Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income 6,060 2,121 3,939 -------- -------- -------- OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $ (5,329) $ (1,865) $ (3,464) -------- -------- --------
15. EARNINGS PER SHARE SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" requires the reporting of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 2003 - ---------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) NUMERATOR: Net income $ 95,238 $ 91,507 $ 86,878 DENOMINATOR: Basic earnings per share: Weighted-average shares 14,258,519 14,344,771 14,458,899 Effect of dilutive securities - stock options 89,724 141,556 92,523 Diluted earnings per share: Adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions 14,348,243 14,486,327 14,551,422 EARNINGS PER SHARE: Basic earnings per share $ 6.68 $ 6.38 $ 6.01 Diluted earnings per share $ 6.64 $ 6.32 $ 5.97
16. DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS Bank regulators limit the amount of dividends a subsidiary bank can declare in any calendar year without obtaining prior approval. At December 31, 2005, approximately $10,701,000 of the total stockholders' equity of the bank subsidiaries is available for the payment of dividends to the Corporation, without approval by the applicable regulatory authorities. 54 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK The Corporation is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. The instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the financial statements. The Corporation's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for loan commitments and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Since many of the loan commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan commitments to customers. The total amounts of off-balance sheet financial instruments with credit risk are as follows:
DECEMBER 31 2005 2004 - ----------- -------- -------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Loan commitments $667,074 $630,041 Unused credit card limits 132,591 139,056 Standby letters of credit 20,872 15,179 -------- --------
The loan commitments are generally for variable rates of interest. The Corporation grants retail, commercial and commercial real estate loans to customers primarily located in Ohio. The Corporation evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties. Although the Corporation has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the borrowers' ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon the economic conditions in each borrower's geographic location. 18. FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets' fair values. INTEREST BEARING DEPOSITS WITH OTHER BANKS: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for interest bearing deposits with other banks approximate those assets' fair values. INVESTMENT SECURITIES: Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. BANK OWNED LIFE INSURANCE: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for bank owned life insurance approximate those assets' fair values. LOANS RECEIVABLE: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for certain mortgage loans (e.g., one-to-four family residential) are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. OFF-BALANCE SHEET INSTRUMENTS: Fair values for the Corporation's loan commitments and standby letters of credit are based on the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counter parties' credit standing. DEPOSIT LIABILITIES: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, savings, and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts for variable-rate, fixed-term certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities of time deposits. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings approximate their fair values. LONG-TERM DEBT: Fair values for long-term debt are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on long-term debt to a schedule of monthly maturities. The fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2005 and 2004, is as follows:
2005 2004 ----------------------- ----------------------- CARRYING FAIR Carrying Fair DECEMBER 31, AMOUNT VALUE Amount Value - ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) FINANCIAL ASSETS: Cash and money market instruments $ 173,973 $ 173,973 $ 161,829 $ 161,829 Interest bearing deposits with other banks 300 300 2,096 2,096 Investment securities 1,663,342 1,657,814 1,926,782 1,927,948 Bank owned life insurance 109,600 109,600 94,909 94,909 Loans: Commercial, financial and agricultural 512,636 512,636 469,382 469,382 Real estate: Construction 193,185 193,185 155,326 155,326 Residential 1,287,438 1,281,657 1,190,275 1,188,930 Commercial 823,354 815,022 752,428 747,289 Consumer, net 494,975 494,064 505,151 499,933 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL LOANS 3,311,588 3,296,564 3,072,562 3,060,860 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Allowance for loan losses (69,694) -- (68,328) -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LOANS RECEIVABLE,NET $3,241,894 $3,296,564 $3,004,234 $3,060,860 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- FINANCIAL LIABILITIES: Noninterest bearing checking $ 667,328 $ 667,328 $ 630,882 $ 630,882 Interest bearing transaction accounts 987,954 987,954 898,575 898,575 Savings 594,706 594,706 632,942 632,942 Time deposits 1,505,903 1,486,989 1,525,613 1,520,609 Other 1,866 1,866 1,849 1,849 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL DEPOSITS $3,757,757 $3,738,843 $3,689,861 $3,684,857 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Short-term borrowings 314,074 314,074 278,231 278,231 Long-term debt 714,784 718,384 795,793 801,315 UNRECOGNIZED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: Loan commitments -- (667) -- (630) Standby letters of credit -- (104) -- (76) ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
55 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 19. CAPITAL RATIOS The following table reflects various measures of capital at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004: 2005 2004 ---------------- ---------------- DECEMBER 31, AMOUNT RATIO Amount Ratio - ------------ -------- ----- -------- ----- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Total equity (1) $558,430 10.27% $562,561 10.39% Tier 1 capital (2) 498,502 14.17% 508,279 15.16% Total risk-based capital (3) 543,000 15.43% 550,675 16.43% Leverage (4) 498,502 9.27% 508,279 10.10%
(1) Stockholders' equity including accumulated other comprehensive income; computed as a ratio to total assets. (2) Stockholders' equity less certain intangibles and accumulated other comprehensive income; computed as a ratio to risk-adjusted assets as defined. (3) Tier 1 capital plus qualifying loan loss allowance; computed as a ratio to risk-adjusted assets, as defined. (4) Tier 1 capital computed as a ratio to average total assets less certain intangibles. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Corporation's tier 1 capital, total risk-based capital and leverage ratios were well above both the required minimum levels of 4.00%, 8.00% and 4.00%, respectively and the well-capitalized levels of 6.00%, 10.00% and 5.00%, respectively. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, all of the Corporation's subsidiary financial institutions met the well-capitalized levels under the capital definitions prescribed in the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991. The following table indicates the capital ratios for each subsidiary at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
2005 2004 ------------------------- ------------------------- TIER 1 TOTAL Tier 1 Total RISK- RISK- Risk- Risk- DECEMBER 31 BASED BASED LEVERAGE Based Based Leverage - ----------- ------ ----- -------- ------ ----- -------- Park National Bank 7.65% 10.41% 5.44% 7.71% 11.04% 5.24% Richland Trust Company 9.76% 11.02% 5.76% 10.23% 11.49% 5.64% Century National Bank 8.91% 11.36% 5.65% 8.40% 10.29% 8.02% First-Knox National Bank 8.87% 12.23% 5.80% 8.44% 12.26% 5.37% United Bank, N.A. 10.82% 12.07% 5.64% 10.88% 12.14% 5.70% Second National Bank 9.27% 12.64% 5.63% 8.84% 12.17% 5.48% Security National Bank 9.42% 13.78% 5.35% 9.43% 13.84% 5.10% Citizens National Bank 11.86% 17.29% 5.60% 11.76% 16.67% 5.68%
20. SEGMENT INFORMATION The Corporation's segments are its banking subsidiaries. The operating results of the banking subsidiaries are monitored closely by senior management and each president of the subsidiary and division are held accountable for their results. Information about reportable segments follows. See Note 2 for a detailed description of individual banking subsidiaries.
ALL PNB RTC CNB FKNB UB SNB SEC CIT OTHERS TOTAL ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 (IN THOUSANDS) Net interest income $ 71,227 $ 20,273 $ 27,599 $ 30,855 $ 8,606 $ 13,592 $ 30,811 $ 6,140 $ 11,461 $ 220,564 Provision for loan losses 2,611 700 150 1,127 (160) (510) 1,005 (100) 584 5,407 Other income 25,566 4,442 7,439 7,191 1,968 2,154 8,880 1,518 547 59,705 Depreciation and amortization 1,705 394 913 675 233 315 993 200 213 5,641 Other expense 43,622 10,226 15,155 16,156 6,026 7,238 18,665 4,701 12,008 133,797 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Income before taxes 48,855 13,395 18,820 20,088 4,475 8,703 19,028 2,857 (797) 135,424 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Federal income taxes 15,924 4,553 6,356 6,739 1,449 2,674 6,231 929 (4,669) 40,186 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- NET INCOME $ 32,931 $ 8,842 $ 12,464 $ 13,349 $ 3,026 $ 6,029 $ 12,797 $ 1,928 $ 3,872 $ 95,238 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2005: Assets $1,999,102 $506,198 $711,804 $753,288 $228,716 $392,257 $924,484 $173,190 $(252,991) $5,436,048 Loans 1,247,105 266,293 503,278 507,148 96,232 203,638 439,698 58,611 6,109 3,328,112 Deposits 1,343,180 373,398 469,333 476,257 180,274 250,553 578,404 123,555 (37,197) 3,757,757 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Operating Results for the year ended December 31, 2004 (In thousands) Net interest income $ 63,050 $ 21,992 $ 19,725 $ 32,329 $ 10,074 $ 15,477 $ 31,939 $ 7,252 $ 10,453 $ 212,291 Provision for loan losses 3,230 735 965 1,695 320 (15) 430 580 660 8,600 Other income 21,401 4,339 5,210 6,766 1,722 2,079 8,257 1,253 821 51,848 Depreciation and amortization 1,708 388 520 693 197 334 1,183 197 216 5,436 Other expense 36,827 10,549 11,413 15,995 6,071 7,282 18,649 4,284 9,784 120,854 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Income before taxes 42,686 14,659 12,037 20,712 5,208 9,955 19,934 3,444 614 129,249 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Federal income taxes 13,808 4,906 3,972 6,864 1,685 3,096 6,485 1,112 (4,186) 37,742 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Net income $ 28,878 $ 9,753 $ 8,065 $ 13,848 $ 3,523 $ 6,859 $ 13,449 $ 2,332 $ 4,800 $ 91,507 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Balances at December 31, 2004: Assets $1,662,200 $511,681 $782,393 $756,454 $236,658 $445,158 $917,084 $200,795 $ (99,839) $5,412,584 Loans 1,011,912 277,812 540,607 479,348 101,628 196,577 436,718 69,830 6,176 3,120,608 Deposits 1,182,804 386,652 530,082 488,748 182,578 262,271 571,580 131,873 (46,727) 3,689,861 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------
56 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Operating Results for the year ended December 31, 2003 (In thousands)
ALL PNB RTC CNB FKNB UB SNB SEC CIT OTHERS TOTAL ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Net interest income $ 61,254 $ 21,081 $ 19,180 $ 31,459 $ 8,615 $ 13,962 $ 31,631 $ 6,493 $ 8,962 $ 202,637 Provision for loan losses 5,385 845 2,025 1,997 110 360 1,471 (35) 437 12,595 Other income 22,980 4,713 5,584 6,801 2,492 2,541 8,437 1,272 703 55,523 Depreciation and amortization 1,988 406 506 685 245 435 1,164 238 199 5,866 Other expense 35,575 9,759 10,850 15,547 5,705 6,853 19,175 4,236 8,810 116,510 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Income before taxes 41,286 14,784 11,383 20,031 5,047 8,855 18,258 3,326 219 123,189 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Federal income taxes 12,861 5,036 3,754 6,403 1,580 2,654 5,892 1,065 (2,934) 36,311 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- Net income $ 28,425 $ 9,748 $ 7,629 $ 13,628 $ 3,467 $ 6,201 $ 12,366 $ 2,261 $ 3,153 $ 86,878 ========== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========== Balances at December 31, 2003: Assets $1,636,753 $576,461 $495,594 $727,543 $245,175 $400,233 $922,334 $204,691 $(173,828) $5,034,956 Loans 927,663 260,726 293,242 462,758 93,669 182,980 436,873 69,652 3,240 2,730,803 Deposits 1,084,537 386,507 340,657 478,207 181,259 276,267 572,031 131,853 (37,069) 3,414,249 ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------
Reconciliation of financial information for the reportable segments to the Corporation's consolidated totals is listed below:
NET INTEREST DEPRECIATION OTHER INCOME INCOME EXPENSE EXPENSE TAXES ASSETS DEPOSITS -------- ------------ -------- ------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) 2005: Totals for reportable segments $209,103 $5,428 $121,789 $44,855 $5,689,039 $3,794,954 Elimination of intersegment items -- -- -- -- (337,393) (37,197) Parent Co. and GFC totals - not eliminated 11,461 62 12,008 (4,669) 84,402 -- Other items -- 151 -- -- -- -- -------- ------ -------- ------- ---------- ---------- TOTALS $220,564 $5,641 $133,797 $40,186 $5,436,048 $3,757,757 ======== ====== ======== ======= ========== ========== 2004: Totals for reportable segments $201,838 $5,220 $111,070 $41,928 $5,512,423 $3,736,588 Elimination of intersegment items -- -- -- -- (173,856) (46,727) Parent Co. and GFC totals - not eliminated 10,453 65 9,784 (4,186) 74,017 -- Other items -- 151 -- -- -- -- -------- ------ -------- ------- ---------- ---------- Totals $212,291 $5,436 $120,854 $37,742 $5,412,584 $3,689,861 ======== ====== ======== ======= ========== ========== 2003: Totals for reportable segments $193,675 $5,667 $107,702 $39,245 $5,208,784 $3,451,318 Elimination of intersegment items -- -- -- -- (237,240) (37,069) Parent Co. and GFC totals - not eliminated 8,962 48 8,808 (2,934) 63,412 -- Other items -- 151 -- -- -- -- -------- ------ -------- ------- ---------- ---------- Totals $202,637 $5,866 $116,510 $36,311 $5,034,956 $3,414,249 ======== ====== ======== ======= ========== ==========
21. PARENT COMPANY STATEMENTS The Parent Company statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the information set forth below. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The effective tax rate for the Parent Company is substantially less than the statutory rate due principally to tax-exempt dividends from subsidiaries. Cash represents noninterest bearing deposits with a bank subsidiary. Net cash provided by operating activities reflects cash payments for income taxes of $5,492,000, $4,386,000 and $3,339,000 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, stockholders' equity reflected in the Parent Company balance sheet includes $120.1 million and $130.5 million, respectively, of undistributed earnings of the Corporation's subsidiaries which are restricted from transfer as dividends to the Corporation. BALANCE SHEETS at December 31, 2005 and 2004
2005 2004 -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS: Cash $ 45,043 $123,418 Investment in subsidiaries 375,454 353,966 Debentures receivable from subsidiary banks 56,000 56,000 Other investments 1,738 1,308 Dividends receivable from subsidiaries 75,075 26,400 Other assets 52,195 47,027 -------- -------- TOTAL ASSETS $605,505 $608,119 ======== ======== LIABILITIES: Dividends payable $ 13,000 $ 12,891 Other liabilities 34,075 32,667 -------- -------- TOTAL LIABILITIES 47,075 45,558 TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 558,430 562,561 -------- -------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $605,505 $608,119 ======== ========
STATEMENTS OF INCOME for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
2005 2004 2003 -------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) INCOME: Dividends from subsidiaries $109,250 $83,000 $69,200 Interest and dividends 6,553 6,461 6,448 Other 514 774 684 -------- ------- ------- TOTAL INCOME 116,317 90,235 76,332 -------- ------- ------- EXPENSE: Other, net 10,096 8,199 7,668 -------- ------- ------- TOTAL EXPENSE 10,096 8,199 7,668 -------- ------- ------- INCOME BEFORE FEDERAL TAXES AND EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES 106,221 82,036 68,664 Federal income tax benefit 5,503 4,791 3,253 -------- ------- ------- INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNING OF SUBSIDIARIES 111,724 86,827 71,917 Equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiaries (16,486) 4,680 14,961 -------- ------- ------- NET INCOME $ 95,238 $91,507 $86,878 -------- ------- -------
57 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
2005 2004 2003 -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income $ 95,238 $ 91,507 $ 86,878 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Undistributed losses (earnings) of subsidiaries 16,486 (4,680) (14,961) (Increase) decrease in dividends receivable from subsidiaries (48,675) 25,500 24,875 Increase in other assets (5,138) (3,833) (5,385) Increase in other liabilities 1,408 3,689 5,147 -------- -------- -------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 59,319 112,183 96,554 -------- -------- -------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Cash paid for acquisition, net (52,500) (43,645) -- (Purchases) sales of investment securities (521) 277 447 Capital contribution to subsidiary (8,000) -- -- -------- -------- -------- NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES (61,021) (43,368) 447 -------- -------- -------- FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Cash dividends paid (51,498) (48,231) (45,742) Proceeds from issuance of common stock 117 144 130 Cash payment for fractional shares (3) (252) (3) Purchase of treasury stock, net (25,289) (16,376) (3,383) -------- -------- -------- NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES (76,673) (64,715) (48,998) -------- -------- -------- (Decrease) increase in cash (78,375) 4,100 48,003 Cash at beginning of year 123,418 119,318 71,315 -------- -------- -------- CASH AT END OF YEAR $ 45,043 $123,418 $119,318 ======== ======== ========
58
EX-14 9 l18755aexv14.txt EX-14 EXHIBIT 14 THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 1 of 10 CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS Adopted by the Board of Directors Park National Corporation January 16, 2001 Amended April 15, 2002 July 21, 2003 April 19, 2004 July 18, 2005 THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 2 of 10 CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS Park National Corporation ("Park") is judged by the collective and individual performance of the directors, officers, and associates of Park and its affiliates (collectively, the "Company"). Thus, these individuals traditionally have recognized that their first duty to the Company and its several publics is to act in a manner that merits public trust and confidence. As professionals, the Company's associates have earned a reputation for integrity and competence. They have been guided and judged by the highest standards of conduct. Over the years, these standards have been reaffirmed, despite new challenges and ever-changing social values. Integrity, honesty, public trust and confidence have served as crucial tests of our service and success. This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code of Ethics") has been adopted by the Board of Directors of Park to demonstrate to the public and the Company's various constituents the importance that Park's Board of Directors and leadership place on ethical conduct. The Code of Ethics is intended to set forth the Company's expectations for the conduct of ethical business practices by its officers, directors and associates, to promote advanced disclosure and review of potential conflicts of interest and similar matters, to protect and encourage the reporting of questionable behavior, to foster an atmosphere of self-awareness and prudent conduct and to discipline appropriately those who engage in improper conduct. The Code of Ethics is not presented to expand upon or change the ethical standards of our affiliates. Rather its purpose is to reduce to writing many of the patterns of conduct that are expected at this institution. It represents a set of minimum standards. It is important to remember that our good reputation emerges from many actions and can be jeopardized by one. You are invited to read this Code of Ethics carefully. Should it be unclear, please seek guidance from your affiliate president or the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, President or Internal Auditor of Park, for in matters such as these, appearance is often as important as reality. It is not only the letter but the spirit of the commitment that is important. Directors and officers of Park and each affiliate are asked, on an annual basis, to re-read this Code of Ethics and provide written verification of such review by signing an acknowledgment form. New associates are asked to read the Code of Ethics and sign the acknowledgment form during their orientation meeting. All associates will re-read and sign new acknowledgment forms after any amendments are approved by the Board of Directors of Park. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST As directors, officers, and associates of a financial services organization, we assume a duty to our communities, our customers and our shareholders. Such duty is to act in all matters in a manner that will merit public trust and confidence. This duty extends to all activities -- both personal and professional. Each person associated with the Company is expected to direct his or her personal conduct in a manner which will bring credit to it and to avoid any action which would discredit it. In the exercise of privileges and authority arising from employment or other association with the Company, two fundamental principles apply: directors, officers, and associates will place the interest of the Company ahead of their own private interests, and directors, officers, and associates have a duty to make full disclosure of any situation in which their private interests create a conflict or potential conflict with those of the Company. Conflicts of interest occur when business judgments or decisions may be influenced by personal interests not shared by the organization as a whole. A conflict situation may, for example, arise when an individual, or a member of the individual's family, has an interest in a transaction to which the Company is a party, competes with the Company or takes advantage of an opportunity that belongs to the Company. When a conflict of interest arises, an officer, director, or associate has a duty to place the Company's interests above his or her own personal interests. It is essential that in those instances where a Company decision or practice may appear to have been made to advance a personal interest, that the decision be made or approved by the independent and "disinterested" officers or directors of the Company. Thus, in those instances where an associate faces a potential conflict of interest, the associate should report the potential conflict of interest to a senior officer for his or her review. Any action or transaction in which the personal interest of an officer or director of the Company may be in conflict with those of the Company must be promptly reported to the chairperson of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Park (the "Audit Committee"). The Audit Committee shall review and oversee all actions and transactions which involve the personal interest of an associate, officer, or director and shall have the right to determine in advance that any such action or transaction does not constitute a conflict of THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 3 of 10 interest in violation of this Code of Ethics. It is considered a conflict of interest, and therefore could result in termination of employment, if an affiliate associate makes a loan, processes any type of transaction (e.g., withdrawals, deposits, check cashing or payments), or waives fees and/or service charges for his/her own personal loans and accounts or those of immediate family members or persons living in the same household (roommate, boyfriend, girlfriend, etc.). It is each associate's responsibility to exercise prudence and good judgment when making loans or processing transactions to or for anyone whose personal relationship with the associate may influence his/her judgment. This policy is not meant to discourage relatives and/or friends of associates from banking with any of our affiliates. They should be afforded the same fine service as other customers. Except when expressly approved in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of the appropriate affiliate, no associate shall accept appointment as a fiduciary or co-fiduciary in any trust, estate, or custodianship, or act as an investment counselor unless the creator of the relationship is related. OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES No outside activity must interfere or conflict with the interest of any of Park or its affiliates. Acceptance of outside employment, election to directorships of other for-profit corporations, representation of customers in their dealings with our affiliates and participation in the affairs of all outside organizations carry possibilities of conflict of interest. No associate may serve as an official or director of any for-profit enterprise without obtaining approval from the appropriate affiliate's Chief Executive Officer. Associates of the Company should ask themselves the following questions when considering a job outside the Company: Is there a conflict of interest? Will it adversely affect my affiliate? Will the job interfere with the time and attention that must be devoted to the job duties, responsibilities, or other obligations at the affiliate? Will company property or equipment or use of proprietary information (such as mailing lists, computer systems, etc.) be involved? If the answer to any of these questions is "yes," the second job should not be accepted. Service with constructive non-profit organizations and participation in civic affairs is strongly encouraged. There are cases, however, when organizations having business relationships with one of our affiliates in which the handling of confidential information is involved might result in a conflict of interest. Associates must be sensitive to such potential conflicts. GIFTS, FEES, GRATUITIES, AND OTHER PAYMENTS FROM CUSTOMERS OR SUPPLIERS Some of our business acquaintances customarily distribute small gifts at Christmas and on other occasions. In the event of receipt of such gift or entertainment opportunity, each director, officer, and associate of the Company must decide conscientiously whether or not acceptance would give rise to a feeling of obligation, or could lead to misinterpretation. Gifts, benefits, or unusual hospitality that might tend to influence one in the performance of his or her duty must not be accepted. Such gifts, benefits or unusual hospitality do not include gifts of nominal value, or gifts which serve as general advertising for the donor, or discounts or special concessions available to all associates, or hospitality which is casual and limited to a normal situation. As a further guide to what may or may not be acceptable, you should ask yourself whether, in the judgment of business associates or disinterested parties, such acceptance might seem to impair your ability to act at all times solely in the best interests of your affiliate. Additional direction on this subject is provided in the "Insider Activities" section of the Comptroller's Handbook (Comptroller of the Currency, March 1995) which also addresses Title 18 U.S.C. 215 "Crime Control Act of 1984". The statute is intended to prevent a pay-off to affiliate officials as a quid pro quo either to induce a particular transaction or as a "gratuity" in support of a particular transaction. Thus, where a benefit is given or received as a result of a banking transaction, the statute may be violated. However, it is not intended to proscribe the receipt of gratuities or favors of nominal value when it is clear from the circumstances that (a) a customer is not trying to exert any influence over the affiliate associate in connection with a transaction and (b) the gratuity or favor is, in fact, unsolicited. If an officer or director receives a personal benefit that is not clearly reasonable and business-related, he/she must report it to the Audit Committee. If an associate receives a personal benefit that is not clearly reasonable and business-related, he/she must report it to the Chief Executive Officer of the appropriate affiliate. The Park Audit Committee or the affiliate Chief Executive Officer, as the case may be, shall have the right to determine in advance that any such personal benefit does not constitute a THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 4 of 10 conflict of interest in violation of this Code of Ethics and/or to require that such personal benefit be returned to the provider and/or reimbursed by the Company. DEALING FAIRLY WITH CUSTOMERS, SUPPLIERS, AND OTHER ASSOCIATES No officer, director, or associate of the Company should take unfair advantage of anyone through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation of material facts or any other unfair dealing practice. The Company does not sanction offering or making payments of any kind, whether of money, services or property, to any domestic or foreign public official or of providing personal benefits that are not clearly reasonable and business-related to any employee, agent or representative of any organization seeking to or doing business with the Company. If there is any question as to whether any such personal benefit is clearly reasonable and business-related, an officer or director should seek pre-approval from the Audit Committee, and an associate from the Chief Executive Officer of the appropriate affiliate. POLITICAL ACTIVITIES Park and/or its affiliates will make no contribution or expenditure, either directly or indirectly, to, or for the benefit of, use of, in support of, or in opposition to, any political party, candidate, political committee, or for any non public issue purpose. The Company will not reimburse any person for such contribution or expenditure. This policy relates to the use of corporate and/or affiliate funds only, and in no way is intended to discourage associates, officers and/or directors from making personal contributions to individual candidates, political parties, or political action committees. The Company may make political loans in connection with campaigns provided that such loans are made in accordance with applicable banking laws, in the ordinary course of business, and in conformity with state law. Directors, officers, and associates of the Company may engage in political activity (serving for example as a campaign treasurer). Associates should inform the persons to whom they report and be very careful not to allow their activity to interfere with their work-related responsibilities. This means such activity would ordinarily be confined to the evenings and weekends and only occasionally and exceptionally would it be engaged in during business hours. Any associate of one of our affiliates who is considering becoming a candidate for any elective public office, engaging in outside employment under any governmental unit, or being appointed to any governmental position should inform the affiliate with which the associate is employed and obtain prior approval by the Chief Executive Officer of that affiliate. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Perhaps the most crucial area of concern for bankers and regulatory authorities is the use and/or abuse of confidential information. Financial institutions by their very nature are privy to customers' business plans, forecasts, decisions, and problems. Bankers receive this information as an aid to providing more efficient, more knowledgeable service. . .and for no other reason. The use of such information for one's own, or another's, personal benefit constitutes an abuse which subjects an individual and the institution to statutory penalties. Banks also possess considerable information which, though not necessarily confidential by nature, must nonetheless be treated confidentially if the right of privacy of customers and staff is to be safeguarded. Therefore, confidential information with respect to the Company's customers and suppliers acquired by an associate through his or her employment is considered to be privileged and must be held in the strictest confidence. It is to be used solely for corporate purposes and not as a basis for personal gain by the associate. In no case shall such information be transmitted to persons outside the Company, including family or other acquaintances, or even to other associates of the Company who do not need to know such information in discharging their duties as associates. The restrictions in this paragraph shall also apply to the reports and statements prepared for use in the Company's business and not generally released. DISHONESTY AND BREACH OF TRUST An associate shall not use his/her position at one of our affiliates to commit an act that would be considered illegal (e.g. theft, falsifying affiliate records, forgery, check kiting, etc.) THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 5 of 10 All associates must conduct themselves with honesty and integrity at all times. Suspicious activities must be reported to the Internal Auditor or Security Officer of their respective affiliate. Upon receipt of such report, the Internal Auditor and/or Security Officer will conduct an investigation. All associates are to cooperate with the resulting investigation. Withholding information or lying to investigators will be cause for immediate termination of employment. All legal violations will be referred to the appropriate police agency for prosecution. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS The Company expects that each and every officer, director, and associate of the Company will comply with all applicable federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations governing the Company's business, including insider trading laws. While this principle is seemingly self-explanatory, at times, the application of any particular law, rule or regulation to the Company may not be perfectly clear. Where an associate is unsure or has any question as to the application to the Company of any law, rule or regulation, it is expected that the associate will seek appropriate guidance from the Chief Executive Officer of the appropriate affiliate, who may seek guidance from outside counsel to the Company. Officers and directors of the Company should seek guidance from the Chief Executive Officer of the appropriate affiliate or from outside counsel to the Company. In addition, the Audit Committee is specifically empowered to engage non-company counsel if or when it believes such engagement is prudent. PERSONAL INVESTMENTS In making personal investments, all officers, directors, and associates shall be guided by a keen awareness of potential conflict. Generally speaking, one's own investments should not be such as to influence his or her judgment or action in the conduct of the Company's business or to profit from security transactions made for our affiliates' customers. An officer, director, or associate should not enter into a security transaction for his or her own account under conditions where information not generally available to the public is made available to the Company on a confidential basis or for corporate purposes and is used as a basis for the individual's action; nor should the individual disclose such information to any unauthorized person. The Company has a comprehensive "Insider Trading Policy" which is applicable to all officers, directors, and associates of the Company as well as to each of their immediate family members. The Company expects that every officer, director, and associate will comply, and will cause their family members to comply, with every aspect of the Securities Trading Policy. PERSONAL BORROWING Associates and officers of the Company may borrow from other financial institutions, providing all transactions are at arm's-length, at market prices, and control of the lending situation is clearly in the hands of the lender. Associates are not permitted to borrow from other customers or suppliers. This prohibition does not preclude borrowing from anyone related to the associate by blood or marriage. Whenever an officer of one of our affiliates becomes indebted to a Park affiliate bank or another financial institution, or to a broker or dealer in securities or commodities, he or she must make a written report to the affiliate bank's president. This report is only required if the amount borrowed increases the officer's indebtedness by $10,000 or more. This report is to include, in addition to full disclosure of information relative to the subject borrowing, a tabular listing of all debt showing the name of the lender, the date and amount of each extension of credit, the date of maturity, the basis for amortization, the current outstanding balance, the security for each loan, and the purpose. It must be delivered within ten days of the date the debt was incurred. Such reports will be reported to the Board of Directors of the officer's affiliate bank, treated confidentially, and maintained in the permanent records of the affiliate bank. More stringent reporting requirements may apply for affiliate officers governed by Regulation O. ANNUAL PERSONAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Annual personal financial statements are required of all officers of our affiliates at year-end, including data for both the officer and his or her spouse. The very nature of a bank officer's job requires that full and complete financial disclosures be made at least on an annual basis, and more often as required. The statements are to be submitted to the Chairman or President of Park and will be made available to the internal auditor of Park. EMPLOYMENT OF RELATIVES THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 6 of 10 The relatives of officers below the title of Vice President and all remaining associates of our affiliates can be employed by one of our affiliates. Occasionally, our affiliates may employ both spouses, although they will not be employed in the same department or branch office. Children of senior officers (Vice President and above) and directors of Park and each of our affiliates are prohibited from permanent employment with the Company. The children of senior officers (Vice President and above) and directors may be employed as temporary help during their student years. PRIVACY PRINCIPLES The Company is committed to protecting customer privacy and the confidentiality of all customer information. Park follows the Banking Industry Privacy Principles for U.S. Financial Institutions, which is attached to and incorporated as part of this Code of Ethics. ASSISTANCE IN MEETING THE COMPANY'S ACCOUNTING, FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS In compliance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, the Company is required to issue financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and then make public disclosures regarding certain aspects of its business. It is expected that all officers, directors, and associates of the Company will keep accurate and complete books, records and accounts that enable the Company to meet its accounting and financial reporting obligations. It is expected that any officer, director, or associate of the Company involved in preparing the Company's disclosures, or any associate or officer asked to provide information relevant to such disclosure, will work to ensure that our public reports and communications are fair, accurate, certifiable, complete, objective, relevant, timely, and understandable. Any associate or officer who, in good faith, believes that the Company's accounting method is inappropriate or not in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, or has concerns about any questionable accounting or auditing matter or any other accounting, internal accounting control or auditing matter, should report this finding directly to Park's Chief Financial Officer and, if unsatisfied with the response, directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has established a procedure for such reports that ensures the confidentiality of the reporting person. Associates and officers may call the Park Improvement Line at 1-800-418-6423 (Ext. 775). In addition, any officer or associate who becomes aware of a material event or fact involving the Company that has not been previously disclosed publicly by the Company should immediately report such material event or fact to Park's Chief Financial Officer or the Chief Executive Officer of the appropriate affiliate. VIOLATIONS OF POLICIES THERE ARE MANY OTHER POLICIES THAT ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE COMPANY AND ITS OPERATIONS. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL RELIEVE ANY OFFICER, DIRECTOR, OR ASSOCIATE FROM COMPLYING WITH ANY OTHER APPLICABLE COMPANY POLICY. Violations of any of the Company's board-approved policies may be cause for disciplinary action, including termination of employment. The Company expects full compliance with this Code of Ethics. In that regard, associates are encouraged to report any violation of the Code of Ethics to their supervisor, Internal Audit Department, Human Resources representative or to their respective Chief Executive Officer. Officers and directors must report any violation of the Code of Ethics to the Audit Committee. Associates, including Officers, may also report suspected violations of the Code of Ethics to the PRK Improvement Line, a confidential telephone number established for these purposes. The Company will not permit any retaliation against an associate who properly reports (to the appropriate personnel) a matter that he or she believes, in good faith, to be a violation of the Code of Ethics. Reports to the Audit Committee may be made on a confidential basis through the procedure established by the Audit Committee. Any associate who is found to have violated the Code of Ethics may be subject to discipline, including termination of employment. The Audit Committee shall investigate any alleged violation of the Code of Ethics by any of the Company's officers or directors. In the event that the Audit Committee determines that a violation of the Code of Ethics has occurred, the Audit Committee shall be authorized to take any action it deems appropriate. If the violation involves an executive officer or director of Park, the Audit Committee shall notify Park's Board of Directors and the Board shall take such action as it deems appropriate. In the event that Park's Board of Directors recognizes that a violation by an executive officer or a director of Park has occurred but elects not to take any remedial or other action against the offending executive officer or director, Park shall disclose the facts and circumstances of its election to waive the Code of Ethics by posting the same on Park's web site or by any other such means as may be required under THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 7 of 10 applicable law or the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the American Stock Exchange. Also, nothing in this Code of Ethics affects the general policy of the Company that employment is at will and can be terminated by the Company at any time and for any or no reason. PRIVACY PRINCIPLES 1. RECOGNITION OF A CUSTOMER'S EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY The Company will recognize and respect the privacy expectations of our customers and explain principles of financial privacy to our customers in an appropriate fashion. 2. USE, COLLECTION AND RETENTION OF CUSTOMER INFORMATION The Company will collect, retain, and use information about individual customers only where we reasonably believe it would be useful (and allowed by law) to administering our business and to provide products, services and other opportunities to our customers. 3. MAINTENANCE OF ACCURATE INFORMATION The Company will maintain procedures so that our customers' financial information is accurate, current and complete in accordance with reasonable commercial standards. We will also respond to requests to correct inaccurate information in a timely manner. 4. LIMITING ASSOCIATE ACCESS TO INFORMATION The Company will take reasonable steps to limit access by our associates to personally identifiable information to those with a business reason for knowing such information. We will continue to educate our associates so that they will understand the importance of confidentiality and customer privacy. We will also take appropriate disciplinary measures to enforce associate privacy responsibilities. 5. PROTECTION OF INFORMATION VIA ESTABLISHED SECURITY PROCEDURES The Company will maintain appropriate security standards and procedures regarding unauthorized access to customer information. 6. RESTRICTIONS ON THE DISCLOSURE OF ACCOUNT INFORMATION The Company will not reveal specific information about customer accounts or other personally identifiable data to unaffiliated third parties for their independent use, except for the exchange of information with reputable information reporting agencies to maximize the accuracy and security of such information in the performance of bona fide corporate due diligence, unless (1) the information is provided to help complete a customer-initiated transaction; (2) the customer requests it; (3) the disclosure is required or allowed by law (i.e. subpoena, investigation of fraudulent activity, etc.); or (4) the customer has been informed about the possibility of such disclosure for marketing or similar purposes through a prior communication and is given the opportunity to decline (i.e. "opt out"). 7. MAINTAINING CUSTOMER PRIVACY IN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITH THIRD PARTIES If personally identifiable customer information is provided to a third party, the Company will insist that the third party adhere to similar Privacy Principles that provide for keeping such information confidential. 8. DISCLOSURE OF PRIVACY PRINCIPLES TO CUSTOMERS The Company will devise methods of providing our customers with an understanding of our privacy policies. IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS POLICY PLEASE CONTACT LAURA B. LEWIS AT (740) 349-3750. IF YOU HAVE COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS ON OVERALL POLICY ADMINISTRATION OR GOVERNANCE PLEASE CONTACT DAVID L. TRAUTMAN AT PNB (740) 349-3927. THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 8 of 10 ASSOCIATE'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS The foregoing Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code of Ethics") will not answer or resolve every question you may have. If you are uncertain about what the right thing to do is, you are encouraged to seek the advice and guidance of your supervisor, your Human Resources representative or your Chief Executive Officer. YOU MAY ALWAYS DIRECTLY REPORT ANY MATTER WHICH YOU BELIEVE, IN GOOD FAITH, TO BE A VIOLATION OF THE FOREGOING CODE OF ETHICS TO PARK'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUDIT COMMITTEE OF PARK'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON A CONFIDENTIAL BASIS. YOU MAY ALSO CALL THE PARK IMPROVEMENT LINE AT 1-800-418-6423 (Ext. 775). I have read and understand the foregoing Code of Ethics, have been given a copy to retain for my reference, and agree to be bound by its terms. I understand I can be subject to discipline, dismissal from my job and prosecution under the law for violating any of the above provisions of the Code of Ethics. ______________________________________________________________________ Print Name SSN ______________________________________________________________ Signature Date THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 9 of 10 OFFICER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS The foregoing Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code of Ethics") will not answer or resolve every question you may have. If you are uncertain about what the right thing to do is, you are encouraged to seek the advice and guidance of your affiliate's Chief Executive Officer. YOU MAY ALWAYS DIRECTLY REPORT ANY MATTER WHICH YOU BELIEVE, IN GOOD FAITH, TO BE A VIOLATION OF THE FOREGOING CODE OF ETHICS TO PARK'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF PARK'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON A CONFIDENTIAL BASIS. YOU MAY ALSO CALL THE PARK IMPROVEMENT LINE AT 1-800-418-6423 (Ext. 775). I have read and understand the foregoing Code of Ethics, have been given a copy to retain for my reference, and agree to be bound by its terms. I understand I may be subject to discipline, dismissal from my job and prosecution under the law for violating any of the above provisions of the Code of Ethics. ______________________________________________________________________ Print Name SSN ______________________________________________________________ Signature Date THE PARK NATIONAL BANK Page 10 of 10 DIRECTOR'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS The foregoing Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code of Ethics") will not answer or resolve every question you may have. If you are uncertain about what the right thing to do is, you are encouraged to seek the advice and guidance of outside counsel to Park National Corporation ("Park") or other counsel designated by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Park. YOU MAY ALWAYS DIRECTLY REPORT ANY MATTER WHICH YOU BELIEVE, IN GOOD FAITH, TO BE A VIOLATION OF THE FOREGOING CODE OF ETHICS TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR THE FULL BOARD. I have read and understand the foregoing Code of Ethics, have been given a copy to retain for my reference, and agree to be bound by its terms. I understand I can be subject to discipline, removal for cause from the Board of Directors and prosecution under the law for violating any of the above provisions of the Code of Ethics. ______________________________________________________________________ Print Name SSN ______________________________________________________________ Signature Date EX-21 10 l18755aexv21.txt EX-21 . . . EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
Name of Subsidiary Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation - ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- The Park National Bank ("PNB") United States (federally-chartered national banking association) Park Investments, Inc. (NOTE: is a wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary of PNB) Scope Leasing, Inc. (NOTE: is a wholly-owned subsidiary Ohio of PNB) Park Leasing Company (NOTE: is a wholly-owned Ohio subsidiary of PNB) Park Insurance Group, Inc. (NOTE: is a wholly-owned Ohio subsidiary of PNB) Park Title Agency, LLC. (NOTE: PNB holds 80% of voting Ohio membership interest) The Richland Trust Company ("Richland") Ohio Richland Investments, Inc. (NOTE: is a wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary of Richland) Century National Bank ("Century") United States (federally-chartered banking association) MFS Investments, Inc. (NOTE: is a wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary of Century) MCT Development Corporation (NOTE: is a wholly-owned Ohio subsidiary of Century) * Zane-Fed Services, Incorporated (NOTE: is a Ohio wholly-owned subsidiary of Century) * The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon ("FKNB") United States (federally-chartered banking association) Guardian Financial Services Company Ohio United Bank, N.A. United States (federally-chartered banking association) Second National Bank United States (federally-chartered banking association)
- ---------- * Inactive
Name of Subsidiary Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation - ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- The Security National Bank and Trust Co. ("Security United States (federally-chartered banking association) National") The Citizens National Bank of Urbana United States (federally-chartered banking association) Park Capital Investments, Inc. ("Park Capital") Delaware Park National Capital LLC (NOTE: members are Park Delaware Capital and PNB) Security National Capital LLC (NOTE: members are Park Delaware Capital and Security National) First-Knox National Capital LLC (NOTE: members are Park Delaware Capital and FKNB) Century National Capital LLC (NOTE: members are Park Delaware Capital and Century)
-2-
EX-23 11 l18755aexv23.txt EX-23 Exhibit 23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Park National Corporation of our reports dated February 21, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Park National Corporation and subsidiaries, Park National Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Park National Corporation, included in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders of Park National Corporation. We also consent to the incorporation by reference into the following Registration Statements: Form S-8 No. 33-92060 Form S-8 No. 333-52653 Form S-8 No. 333-59360 Form S-8 No. 333-59378 Form S-8 No. 333-91178 Form S-8 No. 333-115136 Form S-8 No. 333-126875 of our reports dated February 21, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Park National Corporation and subsidiaries, and with respect to the Park National Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Park National Corporation, incorporated by reference in the 2005 Annual Report (Form 10-K). /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Columbus, Ohio March 7, 2006 EX-24 12 l18755aexv24.txt EX-24 EXHIBIT 24 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned officer and director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ C. Daniel DeLawder --------------------------- C. Daniel DeLawder POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned officer and director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ David L. Trautman --------------------------- David L. Trautman POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned officer of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder and David L. Trautman as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ John W. Kozak --------------------------- John W. Kozak POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for her and in her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as she might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set her hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ Maureen Buchwald --------------------------- Maureen Buchwald POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ James J. Cullers --------------------------- James J. Cullers POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ Harry O. Egger --------------------------- Harry O. Egger POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ F. William Englefield IV ------------------------------- F. William Englefield IV POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ William T. McConnell --------------------------- William T. McConnell POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ Michael J. Menzer --------------------------- Michael J. Menzer POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ John J. O'Neill --------------------------- John J. O'Neill POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ William A. Phillips --------------------------- William A. Phillips POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ J. Gilbert Reese --------------------------- J. Gilbert Reese POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ Rick R. Taylor --------------------------- Rick R. Taylor POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints C. Daniel DeLawder, David L. Trautman and John W. Kozak as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and grants unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 17th day of January, 2006. /s/ Leon Zazworsky --------------------------- Leon Zazworsky EX-31.1 13 l18755aexv31w1.txt EX-31.1 EXHIBIT 31.1 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER) I, C. Daniel DeLawder, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of Park National Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Dated: March 9, 2006 By: /s/ C. Daniel DeLawder -------------------------------------- Printed Name: C. Daniel DeLawder Title: Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 2 EX-31.2 14 l18755aexv31w2.txt EX-31.2 EXHIBIT 31.2 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER) I, John W. Kozak, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of Park National Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Dated: March 9, 2006 By: /s/ John W. Kozak ------------------------------ Printed Name: John W. Kozak Title: Chief Financial Officer 2 EX-32 15 l18755aexv32.txt EX-32 EXHIBIT 32 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION* In connection with the Annual Report of Park National Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned C. Daniel DeLawder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and John W. Kozak, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. /s/ C. Daniel DeLawder /s/ John W. Kozak - ------------------------------------------ --------------------- C. Daniel DeLawder John W. Kozak Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Chief Financial Officer Officer Dated: March 9, 2006 Dated: March 9, 2006 * This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----