CORRESP 1 filename1.htm Document



pinnaclewestimagea01.jpg

 
 
 
 
James R. Hatfield
 
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and
 
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
 
 
 
 
400 North Fifth Street, M.S. 9036
 
 
 
 
Phoenix, Arizona 85004

June 7, 2017


VIA EDGAR
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
William H. Thompson
 
 
 
 
Accounting Branch Chief
 
 
 
 
Office of Consumer Products
 
 
 
 
Division of Corporation Finance, Mail Stop 3561
 
 
 
 
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 
 
 
100 F Street, N.E.
 
 
 
 
Washington, DC 20549-7010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Re:
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
 
 
 
 
 
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
Filed February 24, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
File No. 1-8962
 
 
 

Dear Mr. Thompson:

Set forth below is our response to the comment made by the staff (the “Staff”) of the Division of Corporation Finance of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) in your letter dated May 24, 2017, regarding the above-referenced filing.

For your convenience, we have reproduced the Staff’s comment in bold text below followed by the response of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (the “Company”).

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Electric Revenues, page 98

1.
Please tell us your basis in GAAP for netting contracts to purchase energy against other contracts to sell energy and reducing revenues and fuel and purchased power costs related to such contracts. In doing so, please cite the authoritative guidance that supports netting book-out contracts and the ramifications of default by counterparties. Please ensure your response provides detailed information to support your accounting policy.







Response:

In the electricity business, some derivative contracts to purchase electricity are settled by netting them against other derivative contracts to sell electricity. This is referred to as a book-out and usually occurs in contracts that have the same delivery terms. A book-out is a form of net settlement. When there are purchases and sales of power for delivery at the same time and delivery point, there is no physical movement by the purchaser or seller of the energy. Our accounting policy for these net-settled derivatives is to present these transactions on a net basis in the income statement as required by ASC 815-10-55-62 (formerly EITF 03-11). We have consistently presented these transactions on a net basis in our income statement since we adopted EITF 03-11 in 2003. This presentation is consistent with industry practice.

ASC 815-10-55-62 states that determining whether realized gains and losses on physically settled derivative instruments not held for trading purposes should be reported gross or net in the income statement is a matter of judgment that depends on the relevant facts and circumstances. This guidance further states that the consideration of the facts and circumstances should be made in the context of the various activities of the entity rather than based solely on the terms of the individual contracts. Considerations include the economic substance of the transaction and the gross versus net reporting indicators in FASB ASC Subtopic 605-45 on principal agent considerations.

In the electricity industry, a book-out transaction is a form of net settlement. In forming our judgment about the application of the above guidance, we concluded that presenting these contracts on a gross basis in the income statement would artificially inflate revenues and expenses. The economic substance of the transactions is a net settlement of the contracts. Because physical movement of the power between the purchaser and the seller in these transactions does not occur, we believe that book-out transactions are required to be presented net under the guidance in ASC 815-10-55-62.

With respect to the ramifications of default by counterparties, under ASC 815-10-55-62, credit risk is one consideration to be used in exercising judgment in determining whether revenues should be reported gross or net in the income statement. We believe the nature of our transacting activity outweighs the counterparty credit risk, and net presentation in the income statement is appropriate.

Should you require further clarification of the matters discussed in this letter, please contact me at (602) 250-3800.

 
 
Very truly yours,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ James R. Hatfield
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James R. Hatfield
 
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and
 
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation