-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, GReZ1FcQN3JeTxrMFZ+nfUlDg/6zXUfg3VuIqNWxQBS3e4vQ/jJ5PZWJJU1jgRHe jrgCrdbaSC4R9mJHH1jfZQ== 0000072020-06-000008.txt : 20060227 0000072020-06-000008.hdr.sgml : 20060227 20060224204745 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000072020-06-000008 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 10 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20051231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20060227 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20060224 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: NICOR INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000072020 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION [4924] IRS NUMBER: 362855175 STATE OF INCORPORATION: IL FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-07297 FILM NUMBER: 06644777 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1844 FERRY RD CITY: NAPERVILLE STATE: IL ZIP: 60563 BUSINESS PHONE: 6303059500 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: PO BOX 3014 CITY: NAPERVILLE STATE: IL ZIP: 60566-7014 10-K 1 nicor123105_form10k.htm NICOR INC 12/31/2005 FORM 10K Nicor Inc 12/31/2005 Form 10K




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X ]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
 
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

or

[  ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-7297
NICOR INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Illinois
 
36-2855175
(State of Incorporation)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
   
Identification Number)
1844 Ferry Road
   
Naperville, Illinois 60563-9600
 
(630) 305-9500
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $2.50 per share
 
New York Stock Exchange
   
Chicago Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [X]
Accelerated filer [  ]
Non-accelerated filer [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of common stock (based on the June 30, 2005 closing price of $41.17) held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.8 billion. As of February 21, 2006, there were 44,192,259 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the company’s 2006 Annual Meeting Definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed on or about March 10, 2006, are incorporated by reference into Part III.









Nicor Inc.

Table of Contents
 
       
 
Item No.
Description
Page No.
       
   
Glossary
ii
       
   
Part I
 
 
1.
Business
1
 
1A.
Risk Factors
6
 
1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
10
 
2.
Properties
10
 
3.
Legal Proceedings
10
 
4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
10
   
Executive Officers of the Registrant
11
       
   
Part II
 
 
5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
12
 
6.
Selected Financial Data
13
 
7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14
 
7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
34
 
8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
36
 
9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
71
 
9A.
Controls and Procedures
71
 
9B.
Other Information
73
       
   
Part III
 
 
10.
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
73
 
11.
Executive Compensation
73
 
12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
74
 
13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
74
 
14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
74
       
   
Part IV
 
 
15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
75
   
Signatures
77
   
Exhibit Index
78

 










i

Nicor Inc.

Glossary

Chicago Hub. A venture of Northern Illinois Gas Company, doing business as Nicor Gas Company (“Nicor Gas”) which provides natural gas storage and transmission-related services to marketers and other gas distribution companies.

Degree day. The extent to which the daily average temperature falls below 65 degrees Fahrenheit.  Normal weather for Nicor Gas service territory, for purposes of this report, is considered to be 5,830 degree days per year for 2005 and 6,000 degree days per year for 2004 and 2003.

EN Engineering. EN Engineering, L.L.C., a 50-percent-owned joint venture that provides engineering and corrosion services.

FERC. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the agency that regulates the interstate transportation of natural gas, oil and electricity.

Horizon Pipeline. Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C., a 50-percent-owned joint venture that operates an interstate regulated natural gas pipeline of approximately 70 miles, stretching from Joliet, Illinois to near the Wisconsin/Illinois border.
 
ICC. Illinois Commerce Commission, the agency that establishes the rules and regulations governing utility rates and services in Illinois.

Mcf, MMcf, Bcf. Thousand cubic feet, million cubic feet, billion cubic feet.

Nicor Enerchange. Nicor Enerchange, L.L.C., a wholly owned business that engages in wholesale marketing of natural gas supply services primarily in the Midwest, administers the Chicago Hub for Nicor Gas, and manages Nicor Solutions’ product risks.

Nicor Energy. Nicor Energy, L.L.C., a 50-percent-owned retail energy marketing joint venture which disposed of its customer contracts and ceased operations during 2003.

Nicor Gas. Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company) is a wholly owned public utility business and one of the nation’s largest distributors of natural gas.

Nicor Services. Nicor Energy Services Company, a wholly owned business that provides customer relationship management services to businesses and product warranty contracts, heating, ventilation and air conditioning repair, maintenance and installation services and equipment to retail markets, including residential and small commercial customers.

Nicor Solutions. Nicor Solutions, L.L.C., a wholly owned business that offers residential and small commercial customers energy-related products that provide for natural gas cost stability and management of their utility bill.

PBR. Performance-based rate, a regulatory plan which ended on January 1, 2003, that provided economic incentives based on natural gas cost performance.

TEU. Twenty-foot equivalent unit, a measure of volume in containerized shipping equal to one 20-foot-long container.



ii

Glossary
 
Triton. Triton Container Investments L.L.C., a cargo container leasing company in which Nicor Inc. has an investment.

Tropical Shipping. A wholly owned business and a leading carrier of containerized freight in the Bahamas and the Caribbean region.















































iii

PART I
 
Item 1.  Business
 
Nicor Inc. (“Nicor”), an Illinois corporation formed in 1976, is a holding company. Gas distribution is Nicor’s primary business. Nicor’s principal subsidiaries are Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company (“Nicor Gas”)), one of the nation’s largest distributors of natural gas, and Tropical Shipping, a leading transporter of containerized freight in the Bahamas and the Caribbean region. Nicor also owns several energy-related ventures, including Nicor Services and Nicor Solutions, which provide energy-related products and services to retail markets, and Nicor Enerchange, a wholesale natural gas marketing company. As a consolidated group, Nicor had approximately 3,700 employees at year-end 2005.

Summary financial information for Nicor’s major business segments is included in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 13 - Business Segment and Geographic Information. The following sections describe Nicor’s larger businesses. Certain terms used herein are defined in the glossary on pages ii and iii.

GAS DISTRIBUTION

General

Nicor Gas, a regulated natural gas distribution utility, serves over 2.1 million customers in a service territory that encompasses most of the northern third of Illinois, excluding the city of Chicago. The company’s service territory is diverse and its customer base has grown steadily over the years, providing the company with a well-balanced mix of residential, commercial and industrial customers. Residential customers typically account for 45 to 50 percent of natural gas deliveries, while commercial and industrial customers each typically account for 25 to 30 percent. See Gas Distribution Statistics on page 22 for operating revenues, deliveries and number of customers by customer classification. Nicor Gas had approximately 2,200 employees at year-end 2005.

Nicor Gas maintains franchise agreements with most of the communities it serves, allowing it to construct, operate and maintain distribution facilities in those communities. Franchise agreement terms range up to 50 years. Currently, about 20 percent of the agreements will expire within five years.

Customers have the option of purchasing their own gas supplies, with delivery of the gas by Nicor Gas. The larger of these transportation customers also have options that include the use of Nicor Gas’ storage system and the ability to choose varying supply backup levels. The choice of transportation service as compared to gas sales service results in less revenue for Nicor Gas but has no direct impact on net operating results. Nicor Gas continues to deliver the natural gas, maintain its distribution system and respond to emergencies.

Nicor Gas also operates the Chicago Hub, which provides natural gas storage and transmission-related services to marketers and other gas distribution companies. The Chicago area is a major market hub for natural gas, and demand exists for storage and transmission-related services by marketers, other gas distribution companies and electric power-generation facilities. Nicor Gas’ Chicago Hub addresses that demand. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2005, the rate order received by Nicor Gas provides that Chicago Hub revenues be passed directly through to customers as a credit to Nicor Gas’ Purchased Gas Adjustment (“PGA”) rider.





1

Sources of Natural Gas Supply

Nicor Gas purchases natural gas supplies in the open market by contracting with producers and marketers. It also purchases transportation and storage services from the interstate pipelines that are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). When firm pipeline services are temporarily not needed, Nicor Gas may release the services in the secondary market under FERC-mandated capacity release provisions, with proceeds reducing the cost of gas charged to customers.

Peak-use requirements are met through utilization of company-owned storage facilities, pipeline transportation capacity, purchased storage services and other supply sources, arranged by either Nicor Gas or its transportation customers. Nicor Gas has been able to obtain sufficient supplies of natural gas to meet customer requirements. The company believes natural gas supply and pipeline capacity will be sufficiently available to meet market demands in the foreseeable future.

Natural gas supply. Nicor Gas maintains a diversified portfolio of natural gas supply contracts. Supply purchases are diversified by supplier, producing region, quantity, credit limits and available transportation. Gas supply pricing is generally tied to published price indices so as to approximate current market prices. These supply contracts also may provide for the payment of fixed demand charges to ensure the availability of supplies on any given day.

The company also purchases gas supplies on the spot market to fulfill its supply requirements or to take advantage of favorable short-term pricing. Spot gas purchases accounted for about one-half of the company’s total gas purchases in the last three years. The majority of such spot purchases are made during the summer months and are directed toward satisfying storage injection requirements.

As part of its purchasing practices, Nicor Gas maintains a price risk hedging strategy to reduce the risk of short-term price volatility. A disciplined approach is used to systematically forward hedge a predetermined portion of forecasted monthly volumes.

As noted previously, transportation customers purchase their own gas supplies. About one-half of the gas that the company delivers is purchased by transportation customers directly from producers and marketers.

Pipeline transportation. Nicor Gas is directly connected to eight interstate pipelines, providing access to most of the major natural gas producing regions in North America. The company’s primary long-term transportation contracts are as follows (daily availability in MMBtus):

   
 
Availability
 
Contract Expiration
Natural Gas Pipeline Company (NGPL)
 
698,000
 
March 2009
Horizon Pipeline
 
300,000
 
May 2012
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (TGPC)
 
300,000
 
October 2009
Midwestern Gas Transmission Company
 
297,000
 
October 2009
Northern Natural Gas Company
 
206,000
 
October 2008
Natural Gas Pipeline Company (NGPL)
 
140,000
 
March 2007
Natural Gas Pipeline Company (NGPL)
 
60,000
 
March 2008
ANR Pipeline
 
25,000
 
October 2009

The company has rights of first refusal for contract extensions except for the TGPC contract. In addition to the above contracts, Nicor Gas enters into winter only transportation contracts and contracts that enhance Nicor Gas’ operational flexibility. The availability numbers shown above represent maximums during the winter heating season and in some cases are reduced to lower levels during the summer period.



2

Storage. Nicor Gas owns and operates eight underground natural gas storage facilities. This storage system is one of the largest in the gas distribution industry. With about 150 billion cubic feet (“Bcf”) of annual storage capacity, the system is designed to meet about 50 percent of the company’s estimated peak-day deliveries and approximately 30 percent of its normal winter deliveries. In addition to company-owned facilities, Nicor Gas has about 40 Bcf of purchased storage services under contracts with NGPL that expire in 2009, 2010 and 2012. This level of storage capability provides Nicor Gas with supply flexibility, improves the reliability of deliveries, and can mitigate the risk associated with seasonal price movements.

Competition/Demand

Nicor Gas is the largest natural gas distributor in Illinois and, as a regulated monopoly, has the exclusive right to distribute natural gas in its service territory. Substantially all single-family homes in Nicor Gas’ service territory are heated with natural gas. In the commercial and industrial markets, the company’s natural gas services compete with other forms of energy, such as electricity, coal, propane and oil, based on such factors as price, service, reliability and environmental impact. In addition, the company has a rate that allows negotiation with potential bypass customers, and no customer has bypassed the Nicor Gas system since the rate became effective in 1987. Nicor Gas also offers commercial and industrial customers alternatives in rates and service, increasing its ability to compete in these markets. Other significant factors that impact demand for natural gas include weather and economic conditions.

Natural gas deliveries are temperature-sensitive and seasonal since about one-half of all deliveries are used for space heating. Typically, about three-quarters of the deliveries and revenues occur from October through March. Fluctuations in weather have the potential to significantly impact year-to-year comparisons of operating income and cash flow. It is estimated that a 100 degree-day variation from normal (5,830 degree days annually) would impact Nicor Gas’ net income by about $1.5 million to $2.0 million.

In the first quarter of 2003, Nicor Gas purchased earnings protection against the impact of significantly warmer-than-normal or colder-than-normal weather. No such protection has been purchased since the first quarter of 2003, in part due to weather risks within the consolidated Nicor group that are expected to be partially offsetting with the utility-bill management products marketed by Nicor Solutions. The amount of this offset will vary depending upon the time of year, weather patterns, the number of customers for these products and the market price for natural gas. In 2004, the offsetting impact related to utility-bill management products was about one-third of the gas distribution weather effect.

Nicor Gas’ large residential customer base provides for a relatively stable level of natural gas deliveries during weak economic conditions. The company’s industrial and commercial customer base is well diversified, lessening the impact of industry-specific economic swings. However, management believes that declines since 2000 in natural gas deliveries to industrial customers may be permanent. In addition, during periods of high natural gas prices, deliveries of natural gas can be negatively affected by conservation and the use of alternative energy sources.

Regulation

Nicor Gas is regulated by the Illinois Commerce Commission (“ICC”), which establishes the rules and regulations governing utility rates and services in Illinois. Those rules or regulations that may significantly affect business performance include the following:

·  
Base rates, which are set by the ICC, are designed to allow the company an opportunity to recover its costs and earn a fair return for investors. In the fourth quarter of 2005, the company received approval from the ICC for a base rate increase. For additional information about the rate order, see


3

Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 17 - Rate proceeding.

·  
The company’s ICC-approved tariffs provide that the cost of natural gas purchased for customers will be fully charged to customers without markup. Therefore, the company does not profit from the sale of natural gas. Rather, the company earns income from fixed monthly charges and from variable transportation charges for delivering natural gas to customer premises. The ICC annually reviews the company’s natural gas purchasing practices for prudence, and may disallow the pass-through of costs considered imprudent.

·  
As with the cost of natural gas, the company has a tariff that provides for the pass-through of prudently incurred environmental costs related to former manufactured gas plant sites. This pass-through is also subject to annual ICC review.

·  
The ICC also has other rules that impact the company’s operations. Changes in these rules can impact operating and capital costs.

A performance-based rate (“PBR”) plan for natural gas costs went into effect in 2000 and was terminated by the company effective January 1, 2003. Under the PBR plan, Nicor Gas’ total gas supply costs were compared to a market-sensitive benchmark. Savings and losses relative to the benchmark were determined annually and shared equally with sales customers. The results of the PBR plan are currently under ICC review. Additional information on the plan and the ICC review are presented in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Performance-Based Rate Plan.

Gas distribution, transmission and storage system, and other properties

The gas distribution, transmission and storage system includes approximately 33,000 miles of steel, plastic and cast iron main; approximately 1.9 million steel, plastic/aluminum composite, plastic and copper services connecting the mains to customers’ premises; and eight underground storage fields. Other properties include buildings, land, motor vehicles, meters, regulators, compressors, construction equipment, tools, communication and computer equipment, software and office equipment.

Most of the company’s distribution and transmission property, and underground storage fields are located on property owned by others and used by the company through easements, permits or licenses. The company owns most of the buildings housing its administrative offices and the land on which they sit.

Substantially all gas distribution properties are subject to the lien of the indenture securing Nicor Gas’ first mortgage bonds.

Additional information about Nicor Gas’ business is presented in Item 1A - Risk Factors, Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

SHIPPING

Tropical Shipping is one of the largest containerized cargo carriers in the Bahamas and the Caribbean, a region characterized by modest market growth and intense competition. Tropical Shipping’s financial results can be significantly affected by general economic conditions in the United States, the Caribbean region and Canada. The company is a major carrier of exports from the east coast of the United States and Canada to the Caribbean region. The company’s shipments consist primarily of southbound cargo such as building materials, food and other necessities for developers, manufacturers and residents in the

4

Caribbean and the Bahamas, as well as tourist-related shipments intended for use in hotels and resorts, and on cruise ships. The balance of Tropical Shipping’s cargo consists primarily of northbound shipments of apparel and agricultural products, and inter-island shipments. Other related services such as inland transportation and cargo insurance are also provided by Tropical Shipping or other Nicor subsidiaries.

At December 31, 2005, Tropical Shipping’s fleet consisted of 10 owned vessels and 8 chartered vessels with a container capacity totaling approximately 5,900 twenty-foot equivalent units (“TEUs”). In addition to the vessels, the company owns containers, container-handling equipment, chassis and other equipment. The company leases containers and equipment. Real property, more than half of which is leased, includes office buildings, cargo handling facilities and warehouses located in the United States, Canada, and some of the ports served.

Additional information about Tropical Shipping’s business is presented in Item 1A - Risk Factors, Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

OTHER ENERGY VENTURES

Nicor owns several energy-related ventures, including two companies marketing energy-related products and services, and a wholesale natural gas marketing company. Nicor also has equity interests in several joint ventures including a FERC-regulated natural gas pipeline.

Nicor Services and Nicor Solutions are businesses that provide energy-related products and services to retail markets, including residential and small commercial customers. Nicor Services operates primarily in northern Illinois and provides product warranty contracts, repair, maintenance and installation services and equipment covering heating, air conditioning and related equipment, such as natural gas piping inside homes and ductwork, and customer and prospect management services. Nicor Solutions offers its residential and small commercial customers in the Nicor Gas service territory energy-related products that provide for natural gas price stability and management of their utility bill. These products mitigate and/or eliminate the risks to customers of colder-than-normal weather and/or changes in natural gas prices.

Nicor Enerchange is a business that engages in wholesale marketing of natural gas supply services primarily in the Midwest, administers the Chicago Hub for Nicor Gas, and manages Nicor Solutions’ product risks.

During 2002, Horizon Pipeline, a 50-percent-owned joint venture with NGPL, put into operation a natural gas pipeline of approximately 70 miles, stretching from Joliet, Illinois to near the Wisconsin/Illinois border. Nicor Gas has contracted for approximately 80 percent of Horizon Pipeline’s capacity under a 10-year agreement at rates that have been accepted by FERC.

Nicor Energy was a 50-percent-owned former retail energy marketing joint venture with Dynegy Marketing and Trade. During 2003, Nicor Energy disposed of its customer contracts and ceased operations. For information about Nicor Energy, see Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Nicor Energy.

Additional information about Nicor’s other energy ventures’ is presented in Item 1A - Risk Factors, Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

CORPORATE

Nicor has an equity investment in Triton Container Investments L.L.C., a cargo container leasing business.

5

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Nicor files various reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports include the annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Nicor makes all of these reports available without charge to the public on the investor relations section of the company’s internet site at www.nicor.com as soon as reasonably practicable after Nicor files them with, or furnishes them to, the SEC.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following factors are the most significant factors that can impact year-to-year comparisons and may affect the future performance of the company’s businesses. New risks may emerge and management cannot predict those risks or estimate the extent to which they may affect the company’s financial performance.

Regulation of Nicor Gas, including changes in the regulatory environment in general, may adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Nicor Gas is regulated by the ICC, which has general regulatory power over practically all phases of the public utility business in Illinois, including rates and charges, issuance of securities, services and facilities, system of accounts, investments, safety standards and transactions with affiliated interests and other matters.

Nicor Gas is permitted by the ICC’s PGA regulation to adjust the charge to its sales customers on a monthly basis to recover the company’s prudently incurred actual costs to acquire the natural gas it delivers to them. The company’s gas costs are subject to subsequent prudence reviews by the ICC for which the company makes annual filings. The annual prudence reviews for calendar years 1999-2005 are open for review and any disallowance of costs in those proceedings could adversely affect Nicor Gas’ results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.  See Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion of annual prudence reviews. 

Most of Nicor Gas’ other charges are changed only through a rate case proceeding with the ICC. The charges established in a rate case proceeding are based on an approved level of operating costs and investment in utility property and are designed to allow the company an opportunity to recover those costs and to earn a fair return on that investment. To the extent Nicor Gas’ actual costs to provide utility service are higher than the levels approved by the ICC, Nicor Gas’ results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected until such time as it files for and obtains ICC approval for new charges through a rate case proceeding.
 
Nicor Gas is also subject to rules and regulations pertaining to the integrity of its system and environmental compliance. The company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected by any additional laws or regulations that are enacted that require significant increases in the amount of expenditures for system integrity and environmental compliance.

A change in the ICC’s approved rate mechanisms for recovery of environmental remediation costs at former manufactured gas sites, or adverse decisions with respect to the prudence of costs actually incurred, could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Current environmental laws may require the cleanup of coal tar at certain former manufactured gas plant sites. To date, Nicor Gas has identified about 40 properties for which it may in part be responsible. As of December 31, 2005, the company had recorded a liability of $19.5 million associated with certain remediation efforts. Management believes that any such costs that are not recoverable from other entities

6

or from insurance carriers are recoverable through rates for utility services under ICC-approved mechanisms for the recovery of prudently incurred costs. A change in these rate recovery mechanisms, however, or a decision by the ICC that some or all of these costs were not prudently incurred, could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. See Item 7- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion.

An adverse decision in the proceedings concerning Nicor Gas’ Performance-Based Rate Plan could result in a refund obligation which could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. 

In 2000, Nicor Gas instituted a PBR plan for natural gas costs. Under the PBR plan, Nicor Gas’ total gas supply costs were compared to a market-sensitive benchmark. Savings and losses relative to the benchmark were determined annually and shared equally with sales customers. The PBR plan was terminated effective January 1, 2003. There are allegations that Nicor Gas acted improperly in connection with the PBR plan, and the ICC, SEC and U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois are reviewing these allegations in pending proceedings. An adverse decision or decisions in these proceedings could result in a refund or other obligations which could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. See Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion of the PBR proceeding and related matters.

Nicor Gas relies on direct connections to eight interstate pipelines and extensive underground storage capacity. If these pipelines or storage facilities were unable to deliver for any reason it could impair Nicor Gas’ ability to meet its customers’ full requirements.

Nicor Gas meets its customers’ peak day, seasonal and annual gas requirements through deliveries of gas transported on interstate pipelines with which it or its gas suppliers have contracts and through withdrawals of gas from storage fields it owns or leases. Nicor Gas contracts with multiple pipelines for these services. If a pipeline were to fail to perform transportation or storage service, including as a result of war, acts or threats of terrorism or natural disaster, on a peak day or other day with high volume gas requirements, Nicor Gas’ ability to meet all its customers’ gas requirements may be impaired unless or until alternative arrangements for delivery of supply were put in place. Likewise, if a storage field owned by Nicor Gas, or a principal Nicor Gas-owned transmission or distribution pipeline used to deliver gas to the market, were to be out of service for any reason, including as a result of war, acts or threats of terrorism or natural disaster, this could impair Nicor Gas’ ability to meet its customers’ full requirements.

Fluctuations in weather have the potential to adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

When weather conditions are milder than normal, Nicor’s gas distribution segment has historically delivered less natural gas, and consequently may earn less income. Nicor Gas’ natural gas deliveries are temperature-sensitive and seasonal since about one-half of all deliveries are used for space heating. Typically, about three-quarters of the deliveries and revenues occur from October through March. Mild weather in the future could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. 

Natural gas commodity price changes may affect the operating costs and competitive positions of the company’s businesses which could adversely affect its results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Nicor’s energy-related businesses are sensitive to changes in natural gas prices. Natural gas prices historically have been volatile and may continue to be volatile in the future. The prices for natural gas are

7

subject to a variety of factors that are beyond Nicor’s control. These factors include, but are not limited to, the level of consumer demand for, and the supply of, natural gas, processing, gathering and transportation availability, the level of imports of, and the price of foreign natural gas, the price and availability of alternative fuel sources, weather conditions, political conditions or hostilities in natural gas producing regions.

Any changes in natural gas prices could affect the prices Nicor’s energy-related businesses charge, operating costs and the competitive position of products and services. In accordance with the ICC’s PGA regulations, Nicor Gas adjusts its gas cost charges to sales customers on a monthly basis to account for changes in the price of natural gas. However, changes in natural gas prices can also impact certain operating expenses such as bad debt expense, company use gas and storage-related gas expenses, financing costs and customer service expenses, and these changes can only be reflected in Nicor Gas’ charges to customers if approved by the ICC in a rate case. Increases in natural gas prices can also have an adverse effect on natural gas distribution margin because such increases can result in lower customer demand.

Nicor’s other energy businesses are also subject to natural gas commodity price risk, arising primarily from fixed-price purchase and sale agreements, natural gas inventories and utility-bill management arrangements. Derivative instruments such as futures, options, forwards and swaps may be used to hedge these risks.

Nicor is subject to margin requirements in connection with the use of derivative financial instruments and these requirements could escalate if prices move adversely.

Nicor’s use of derivative instruments could adversely affect the company’s results of operations.
 
Nicor uses derivative instruments, including futures, options, forwards and swaps, either traded on exchanges or executed over-the-counter with natural gas merchants as well as financial institutions, to hedge natural gas price risk. Fluctuating natural gas prices cause earnings and financing costs of Nicor to be impacted. The use of derivative instruments that are not perfectly matched to the exposure could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Also, when Nicor’s derivative instruments and hedging transactions fail to qualify for hedge accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the company’s results of operations could be adversely affected.

Adverse decisions in lawsuits seeking a variety of damages allegedly caused by mercury spillage could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Nicor Gas has incurred, and expects to continue to incur, costs related to its historical use of mercury in various kinds of equipment. Nicor Gas is a defendant in several private lawsuits, all in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, seeking a variety of damages (including bodily injury, property and punitive damages) allegedly caused by mercury spillage resulting from the removal of mercury-containing regulators. Adverse decisions regarding these claims or other mercury-related claims, to the extent they require the company to make payments in excess of amounts provided for in its financial statements, could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. See Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion.

Transporting and storing natural gas involves numerous risks that may result in accidents and other operating risks and costs that could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.



8

Nicor Gas’ gas distribution activities involve a variety of inherent hazards and operating risks, such as leaks, accidents and mechanical problems, which could cause substantial financial losses. In addition, these risks could result in loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental pollution and impairment of Nicor’s operations, which in turn could lead to substantial losses. In accordance with customary industry practice, Nicor maintains insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses. The location of pipelines and storage facilities near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers and industrial sites, could increase the level of damages resulting from these risks. The occurrence of any of these events if not fully covered by insurance could adversely affect Nicor’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

An inability to access financial markets could affect the execution of Nicor’s business plan and could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
 
Nicor relies on access to both short-term money markets and longer-term capital markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital and operating requirements not satisfied by the cash flows from its operations. Management believes that Nicor and its subsidiaries will maintain sufficient access to these financial markets based upon current credit ratings. However, certain disruptions outside of Nicor’s control or events of default under its debt agreements may increase its cost of borrowing or restrict its ability to access one or more financial markets. Such disruptions could include an economic downturn, the bankruptcy of an unrelated energy company or downgrades to Nicor’s credit ratings. Restrictions on Nicor’s ability to access financial markets may affect its ability to execute its business plan as scheduled and could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Changes in the rules and regulations of certain regulatory agencies could adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows and financial condition of Tropical Shipping.

Tropical Shipping is subject to the International Ship and Port-facility Security ("ISPS") Code and is also subject to the United States Maritime Transportation Security Act ("MTSA"), both of which require extensive security assessments, plans and procedures. Tropical Shipping is also subject to the regulations of both the Federal Maritime Commission (“FMC”), and the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”), other Federal Agencies as well as local laws, where applicable. Additional costs that could result from changes in the rules and regulations of these regulatory agencies would adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows and financial condition of Tropical Shipping.

Tropical Shipping’s business is dependent on general economic conditions and could be adversely affected by downturns in the economy.
 
Tropical Shipping’s business consists primarily of building materials, food and other necessities for developers, manufacturers and residents in the Bahamas and the Caribbean region, as well as tourist-related shipments intended for use in hotels and resorts, and on cruise ships. As a result, Tropical Shipping’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition can be significantly affected by general economic conditions in the United States, the Bahamas, Caribbean region and Canada.
 
The occurrence of hurricanes, storms and other natural disasters in Tropical Shipping’s area of operations could adversely affect its results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
 
Tropical Shipping’s operations are affected by weather conditions in Florida, Canada, the Bahamas and Caribbean regions. During hurricane season in the summer and fall, Tropical Shipping may be subject to revenue loss, higher operating expenses, business interruptions, delays and ship, equipment and facilities damage which could adversely affect Tropical Shipping’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
 


9

Nicor Enerchange has credit risk that could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Nicor Enerchange extends credit to its counterparties. Despite prudent credit policies and the maintenance of netting arrangements, the company is exposed to the risk that it may not be able to collect amounts owed to it. If the counterparty to such a transaction fails to perform and any collateral Nicor Enerchange has secured is inadequate, Nicor Enerchange could experience financial losses.

The company is involved in legal or administrative proceedings before various courts and agencies that could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

The company is involved in legal or administrative proceedings before various courts and agencies with respect to general claims, rates, taxes, environmental, gas cost prudence reviews and other matters. Adverse decisions regarding these matters, to the extent they require the company to make payments in excess of amounts provided for in its financial statements, could adversely affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. See Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion.

The risks described above should be carefully considered in addition to the other cautionary statements and risks described elsewhere, and the other information contained in this report and in Nicor’s other filings with the SEC, including its subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K. The risks and uncertainties described above are not the only risks Nicor faces although they are the most significant risks. See Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, and Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 8 - Income and Other Taxes and Note 19 - Contingencies for further discussion of these and other risks Nicor faces.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.
 
Item 2.  Properties

Information concerning Nicor and its major subsidiaries’ properties is included in Item 1 - Business, and is incorporated herein by reference. These properties are suitable, adequate and utilized in the company’s operations.
 
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
 
See Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 17 - Rate proceeding and Note 19 - Contingencies, which are incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders

None.









10

Executive Officers of the Registrant 

Name
 
Age
 
Current Position and Background
         
Russ M. Strobel
 
53
 
Chairman, Nicor and Nicor Gas (since November 2005); Chief Executive Officer, Nicor (since March 2005); Chief Executive Officer, Nicor Gas (since 2003); President, Nicor and Nicor Gas (since 2002); Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Nicor and Nicor Gas (2002); Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Nicor and Nicor Gas (2000-2002).
         
Richard L. Hawley
 
56
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Nicor and Nicor Gas (since 2003); Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Puget Energy, Inc., electric and natural gas provider (2000-2002) and Puget Sound Energy, Inc., electric and natural gas provider (1998-2002).
         
Claudia J. Colalillo
 
56
 
Senior Vice President Human Resources and Corporate Communications, Nicor and Nicor Gas (since 2002); Vice President Human Resources, Nicor and Nicor Gas (1998-2002).
         
Rocco J. D’Alessandro
 
47
 
Senior Vice President Operations, Nicor Gas (since 2002); Vice President Customer Service, Nicor Gas (1999-2002).
         
Daniel R. Dodge
 
52
 
Senior Vice President Diversified Ventures and Corporate Planning, Nicor and Nicor Gas (since 2002); Vice President Business Development, Nicor and Nicor Gas (1998-2002).
         
George M. Behrens
 
50
 
Vice President and Treasurer, Nicor and Nicor Gas (since 2004); Vice President Administration and Treasurer, Nicor and Nicor Gas (2000-2004).
         
Paul C. Gracey, Jr.
 
46
 
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Nicor and Nicor Gas (since 2002); Vice President and General Counsel, Midwest Generation, Chicago, independent power producer (2000-2002).
         
Gerald P. O’Connor
 
 
54
 
Vice President Administration and Finance, Nicor and Nicor Gas (since 2004); Temporary General Manager - Internal Audit, Nicor and Nicor Gas (2003-2004); Partner, Tatum Partners L.L.C., professional services (2003-2004); Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Aux Sable Liquid Products L.L.P., natural gas processing (2000-2002).









11

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Nicor common stock is listed on the New York and Chicago Stock Exchanges. At February 21, 2006, there were approximately 22,300 common stockholders of record and the closing stock price was $41.76.
 
 
 
Stock price
 
Dividends
Quarter
   
High
   
Low
   
Declared
                   
2005
                 
First
 
$
38.33
 
$
35.50
 
$
.465
Second
   
41.87
   
35.76
   
.465
Third
   
42.59
   
39.10
   
.465
Fourth
   
42.97
   
37.42
   
.465
                   
2004
                 
First
 
$
37.43
 
$
32.49
 
$
.465
Second
   
35.65
   
32.04
   
.465
Third
   
37.36
   
32.37
   
.465
Fourth
   
39.65
   
35.89
   
.465
                   

In September 2001, Nicor announced a $50 million common stock repurchase program, under which Nicor may purchase its common stock as market conditions permit through open market transactions and to the extent cash flow is available after other cash needs and investment opportunities. There have been no repurchases under this program during 2005 or 2004. As of December 31, 2005, $21.5 million remained authorized for the repurchase of common stock.

On December 30, 2004, the company transferred 8,141 shares of its common stock to one individual in connection with the 2003 purchase of the assets and assumption of certain liabilities of a heating and air conditioning business owned by that individual. The shares were sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to an exemption under Rule 505 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933. The issuance was effected without general solicitation or advertising.



















12

 
 
Nicor Inc.
                                     
                                       
Item 6.  Selected Financial Data
   
 
                               
 (in millions, except per share data)                                      
Year ended December 31
   
           
2005
   
2004
   
2003
   
2002
   
2001
 
                                       
Operating revenues
       
$
3,357.8
 
$
2,739.7
 
$
2,662.7
 
$
1,897.4
 
$
2,366.3
 
                                       
Operating income
       
$
201.7
 
$
137.7
 
$
189.4
 
$
226.5
 
$
219.2
 
                                       
Income before cumulative effect of
                                     
accounting change
       
$
136.3
 
$
75.1
 
$
109.8
 
$
128.0
 
$
122.1
 
                                       
Net income
       
$
136.3
 
$
75.1
 
$
105.3
 
$
128.0
 
$
122.1
 
                                       
Earnings per common share
                                     
Basic
                                     
Before cumulative effect of
                                     
accounting change
       
$
3.08
 
$
1.71
 
$
2.49
 
$
2.90
 
$
2.70
 
Basic earnings per share
         
3.08
   
1.71
   
2.39
   
2.90
   
2.70
 
                                       
Diluted
                                     
Before cumulative effect of
                                     
accounting change
       
$
3.07
 
$
1.70
 
$
2.48
 
$
2.88
 
$
2.69
 
Diluted earnings per share
         
3.07
   
1.70
   
2.38
   
2.88
   
2.69
 
                                       
Dividends declared per
                                     
common share
       
$
1.86
 
$
1.86
 
$
1.86
 
$
1.84
 
$
1.76
 
                                       
Property, plant and equipment
                                     
Gross
       
$
4,351.3
 
$
4,143.6
 
$
3,999.5
 
$
3,872.8
 
$
3,733.0
 
Net
         
2,659.1
   
2,549.8
   
2,484.2
   
2,421.8
   
2,343.6
 
                                       
Total assets
       
$
4,391.2
 
$
3,975.2
 
$
3,797.2
 
$
3,524.4
 
$
3,182.2
 
                                       
Capitalization
                                     
Long-term bonds and notes, net of
                                     
current maturities
       
$
485.8
 
$
495.3
 
$
495.1
 
$
396.2
 
$
446.4
 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
         
.6
   
1.6
   
1.8
   
4.3
   
6.1
 
Common equity
         
811.3
   
749.1
   
754.6
   
728.4
   
704.2
 
         
$
1,297.7
 
$
1,246.0
 
$
1,251.5
 
$
1,128.9
 
$
1,156.7
 
                                       
See Item 1A - Risk Factors and Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for factors that can impact year-to-year comparisons and may affect the future performance of Nicor's business.
     
 
13
 

 
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The purpose of this financial review is to explain changes in operating results and financial condition from 2003 to 2005 and to discuss business trends that might affect Nicor. Certain terms used herein are defined in the glossary on pages ii and iii. The discussion is organized into six sections - Summary, Results of Operations, Financial Condition and Liquidity, Outlook, Contingencies and Critical Accounting Estimates.

SUMMARY

Nicor Inc. (“Nicor”) is a holding company with two principal business segments - gas distribution and shipping. Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company (“Nicor Gas”)) is one of the nation’s largest natural gas distribution companies, and it is Nicor’s primary business. Tropical Shipping is a containerized shipping business serving the Bahamas and the Caribbean region that typically represents most of the balance of Nicor’s operating income. Nicor also owns or has equity interests in several energy-related businesses.

Net income and diluted earnings per common share are presented below (in millions, except per share data):

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
$
136.3
   
$
75.1
   
$
109.8
 
Net income
 
136.3
     
75.1
     
105.3
 
Earnings per average share of common stock:
                     
Diluted - before cumulative effect of accounting change
 
3.07
     
1.70
     
2.48
 
Diluted - after cumulative effect of accounting change
 
3.07
     
1.70
     
2.38
 

Net income and diluted earnings per share for 2005 compared with 2004 were impacted significantly by the absence of last year’s first-quarter securities class action settlement charge ($38.5 million pretax or $0.52 per share) coupled with net 2005 insurance recoveries and earnings thereon ($29.9 million pretax or $0.41 per share) related to the securities class action and shareholder derivative lawsuit settlements. The current year was also significantly impacted by a tax benefit recognized in the fourth quarter of 2005 (approximately $17 million or $0.38 per share) in connection with the American Jobs Creation Act (the “Jobs Act”). For more information, see Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Securities Class Actions, Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits and Other, and Note 8 - Income and Other Taxes.

Year over year comparisons also reflect higher operating results at Tropical Shipping and lower corporate overhead costs, partially offset by lower operating results in the gas distribution and other energy-related businesses. Results of the gas distribution business reflect the impact of the base rate increase which became effective in the fourth quarter. See Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 17 - Rate proceeding for further discussion of the rate order.

Net income and diluted earnings per share were lower in 2004 compared with 2003 due in large part to a $38.5 million pretax litigation charge recorded in the first quarter of 2004 related to an agreement to settle securities class action lawsuits. The charge reduced net income by $23.2 million and diluted earnings per share by $0.52. For more information, see Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Securities Class Actions.




14


Results for 2004 were also impacted by lower operating results in the gas distribution segment and an absence of gains that occurred in 2003 related to the company’s previously written off investment in Nicor Energy. Partially offsetting these negative factors were higher operating results in the shipping segment and at Nicor’s other energy ventures, a decrease in the effective income tax rate, and the absence of a cumulative effect loss that occurred in 2003 due to a change in accounting method at Nicor Enerchange.

Rate proceeding.  Nicor Gas filed a request with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“ICC”) for an overall increase in base rates on November 4, 2004.  In late 2005, Nicor Gas received approval from the ICC for a $54.2 million base rate increase which reflected an allowed rate of return on original-cost rate base of 8.85 percent, including a 10.51 percent cost of common equity. The order also included the authorization to pass all Chicago Hub revenues directly through to customers as a credit to Nicor Gas’ Purchased Gas Adjustment (“PGA”) rider and the shifting of certain storage-related costs from the PGA rider to base rates.  In addition, rates were established using a 10-year average for weather as opposed to the previous use of a 30-year average. The new rates were implemented in the fourth quarter of 2005. Because the order shifts certain items between base rates and Nicor Gas’ PGA rider, the company estimates that, under normal weather conditions, the annual net revenue increase resulting from implementing the new rate order will be about $34.7 million under the tariffs that have been placed into effect.

In October 2005, Nicor Gas and six other parties filed applications for rehearing of the final order of the rate case.  The ICC granted rehearing on seven issues, only two of which relate to the amount of the approved annual net revenue increase, and denied rehearing on all other issues raised in the applications.  The ICC is expected to issue its decision on rehearing in March 2006. As a result of the rehearing process, the actual annual net revenue increase approved by the ICC could change. Based on the positions of the parties on the rehearing issues, the outcome could range from an approximate $7.1 million reduction to the annual net revenue increase to an approximate $0.9 million additional annual increase. Rate changes, if any, resulting from the outcome of the rehearing process would be prospective.

Shifting of certain storage-related costs from the PGA rider to base rates results in Nicor Gas bearing the impact that changes in natural gas prices have on those costs. During 2005 these costs approximated $17.5 million, $6.5 million of which were incurred after the effective date of the rate order and were therefore classified as operating and maintenance expense. Costs incurred prior to the effective date of the rate order are classified as cost of gas.

Details of various financial and operating information by segment can be found on the pages that follow.

Operating income by segment. Operating income (loss) by major business segment is presented below (in millions):

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
Gas distribution
$
116.9
   
$
130.8
   
$
166.2
 
Shipping
 
40.4
     
31.6
     
22.7
 
Other energy ventures
 
14.1
     
19.3
     
7.9
 
Corporate and eliminations
 
30.3
     
(44.0
)
   
(7.4
)
 
$
201.7
   
$
137.7
   
$
189.4
 






15

The following summarizes operating income (loss) comparisons by major business segments:

·  
Gas distribution operating income decreased $13.9 million in 2005 as compared with 2004 due to higher operating and maintenance expenses ($19.9 million increase), higher depreciation expense ($5.7 million increase), and lower gains on property sales ($5.5 million decrease). The adverse impact of these factors was partially offset by higher gas distribution margin ($17.5 million increase). Higher gas distribution margin was largely driven by higher average rates due in part to the rate increase which became effective during the fourth quarter of 2005 ($12.8 million) and the positive impact of colder weather than in 2004 (approximately $4 million increase), partially offset by lower demand unrelated to weather (approximately $6 million decrease). After consideration of the impacts of the rate order on gas distribution margin and operating and maintenance expenses, the fourth quarter rate increase added approximately $9 million to gas distribution operating income.
 
Gas distribution operating income decreased $35.4 million in 2004 as compared with 2003 due primarily to decreased mercury-related recoveries ($17.8 million decrease, net of costs), higher operating and maintenance expenses ($14.8 million increase), the negative impact of warmer weather than in 2003 (approximately $6 million decrease) and higher depreciation expense ($5.3 million increase). These negative factors were partially offset by an increase in gains on property sales ($5.5 million increase) and the impact of an increased number of customers ($3.3 million increase).

·  
Shipping operating income for 2005 increased $8.8 million compared with 2004 due primarily to an increase in revenue ($67.8 million increase) driven by higher average rates and increased volumes shipped across substantially all ports, partially offset by increased operating expenses ($59.0 million increase). Shipping segment operating expenses increased due primarily to higher transportation and payroll-related costs, driven by higher volumes shipped. Transportation-related costs include fuel, inland freight, vessel charter, voyage and transportation, and port costs. Higher legal and audit fees also contributed to the increase in expenses, reflecting approximately $5.1 million of costs incurred in connection with the repatriation of funds and the reorganization of Tropical Shipping to take advantage of the benefits of the Jobs Act.

Earnings during 2005 were positively impacted due to favorable economic conditions and the rebuilding efforts following the 2004 hurricanes. Shipping operating income for 2004 increased $8.9 million compared with 2003 due primarily to an increase in revenue ($38.5 million increase) driven by increased volumes shipped and higher average rates, partially offset by lower charter income and increased operating expenses ($29.6 million increase), primarily voyage and transportation, inland freight, port and other costs. Unfavorable economic conditions in the Caribbean, the Bahamas and the United States in 2003 had a negative impact on tourism and on construction projects.

·  
Operating income from Nicor’s other energy ventures for 2005 decreased $5.2 million compared with 2004 due primarily to lower operating results at Nicor Enerchange ($6.3 million decrease). Lower Nicor Enerchange results reflect unfavorable fair value adjustments related to derivative instruments used to hedge future sales of natural gas inventory. These losses are expected to reverse in the future as the underlying transactions are settled. Nicor Enerchange purchases and holds natural gas in storage to earn a profit margin from its ultimate sale. Nicor Enerchange uses derivatives to mitigate commodity price risk in order to substantially lock-in the profit margin that will ultimately be realized. However, gas stored in inventory is required to be accounted for at the lower of weighted-average cost or market, whereas the derivatives used to reduce the risk associated with a change in the value of the inventory are accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in operating results in the period of change. As a result, earnings are subject to volatility as the market price of derivatives change, even when the underlying hedged value of the inventory is unchanged. The volatility resulting from this accounting can be significant from period to period.

16


Operating income from Nicor’s other energy ventures for 2004 increased $11.4 million compared with 2003 due primarily to higher operating results at Nicor Enerchange ($5.8 million increase) and at Nicor’s energy-related products and services businesses ($4.2 million increase), and the absence of prior-year losses from former business activities ($0.8 million decrease). The improvements were due predominantly to an increased average number of utility-bill management customers at Nicor Solutions and related risk-management activities handled by Nicor Enerchange instead of by an outside party.

·  
The $74.3 million increase in operating income for 2005 as compared with 2004 attributed to “Corporate and eliminations” is due primarily to the absence of last year’s securities class action settlement charge ($38.5 million) and 2005 net insurance recoveries and earnings thereon ($29.9 million) related to the securities class action and shareholder derivative lawsuit settlements. For more information, see Litigation charges (recoveries), net and Other corporate expenses and eliminations discussion below and Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Securities Class Actions, Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits and Other.

The 2004 increase in operating loss attributed to “Corporate and eliminations” as compared with 2003 is due primarily to the 2004 litigation charge of $38.5 million as noted above.

These factors are discussed in more detail in the Results of Operations section.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Details of various financial and operating information by segment can be found in the tables throughout this review. The following discussion summarizes the major items impacting Nicor’s operating income.

Operating revenues. Operating revenues by major business segment are presented below (in millions):

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
Gas distribution
$
2,909.6
   
$
2,362.1
   
$
2,351.6
 
Shipping
 
378.5
     
310.7
     
272.2
 
Other energy ventures
 
157.0
     
155.3
     
96.5
 
Corporate and eliminations
 
(87.3
)
   
(88.4
)
   
(57.6
)
 
$
3,357.8
   
$
2,739.7
   
$
2,662.7
 

Gas distribution revenues are impacted by changes in natural gas costs, which are passed directly through to customers without markup, subject to ICC review. For the year 2005, gas distribution revenues increased $547.5 million as compared with 2004 due primarily to higher natural gas costs ($526.1 million increase) and the positive impact of colder weather than in 2004 (approximately $60 million increase), partially offset by lower demand unrelated to weather (approximately $70 million decrease). These results also reflect the impact of the rate order tariffs, which became effective during the fourth quarter of 2005, and increased revenues by approximately $12.8 million.

For the year 2004, gas distribution revenues increased $10.5 million as compared with 2003 due primarily to higher natural gas costs ($96.5 million increase) and higher revenue taxes ($16.5 million increase). These positive factors were largely offset by the negative effect of warmer weather than in 2003 (approximately $100 million decrease).





17


In 2005, shipping segment operating revenues increased over 2004 due primarily to higher average rates ($41.8 million increase) and increased volumes shipped ($25.3 million increase). Rates were higher due to general rate increases across all markets and higher cost-recovery surcharges for fuel and security.  The volume increases were recognized across substantially all ports, reflecting improvements in the economy, significant increases in Bahamian and Caribbean investment, and rebuilding efforts following the 2004 hurricanes.

In 2004, shipping segment operating revenues increased over 2003 due primarily to increased volumes shipped ($31.9 million increase) and higher average rates ($8.7 million increase), partially offset by decreased charter income ($2.1 million decrease). These higher volumes reflect increased tourism and post-hurricane construction activity in the Caribbean region and the Bahamas. Rates were higher due to a general rate increase and higher cost-recovery surcharges for fuel and security.

The 2005 increase in revenues for other energy ventures was due to improved revenues at Nicor’s energy-related products and services businesses ($8.3 million increase) due primarily to new business initiatives, higher contract volumes, and improved average contract pricing, partially offset by lower revenues at Nicor Enerchange ($6.5 million decrease) due primarily to unfavorable fair value adjustments discussed above under the Operating income by segment section.

The 2004 increase in revenues for other energy ventures was due primarily to higher revenues at Nicor’s energy-related products and services businesses ($52.4 million increase), and Nicor Enerchange ($7.2 million increase). The improvements were due predominantly to an increased average number of utility-bill management customers at Nicor Solutions and related risk-management activities handled by Nicor Enerchange instead of by an outside party.

Corporate and eliminations primarily reflects the elimination of gas distribution revenues against Nicor Solutions’ expenses for customers purchasing the utility-bill management products.

Gas distribution margin. Nicor utilizes a measure it refers to as “gas distribution margin” to evaluate the operating income impact of gas distribution revenues. Gas distribution revenues include natural gas costs which are passed directly through to customers without markup, subject to ICC review, and revenue taxes, for which Nicor Gas earns a small administrative fee. These items often cause significant fluctuations in gas distribution revenues, and yet they have virtually no direct impact on gas distribution operating income.

A reconciliation of gas distribution revenues and margin follows (in millions):
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
Gas distribution revenues
$
2,909.6
   
$
2,362.1
   
$
2,351.6
 
Cost of gas
 
(2,212.4
)    
(1,695.0
 )
   
(1,692.7
 )
Revenue tax expense
 
(152.0
)    
(139.4
 )    
(130.9
 )
Gas distribution margin
$
545.2
   
$
527.7
   
$
528.0
 

For the year 2005, gas distribution margin increased $17.5 million from 2004 due primarily to higher average rates (approximately $19 million increase) driven by the rate increase ($12.8 million), and the positive impact of colder weather than in 2004 (approximately $4 million increase), partially offset by lower demand unrelated to weather (approximately $6 million decrease).





18


For the year 2004, gas distribution margin was essentially unchanged from 2003, although affected by a number of offsetting factors. Warmer weather than in 2003 (approximately $6 million decrease) and an adjustment related to prior-year performance-based rate (“PBR”) plan results ($1.8 million) had a negative effect on margin. These negative factors were partially offset by the impact of an increased number of customers ($3.3 million increase), higher average rates charged during the period ($2.2 million increase) and higher revenue tax administration fees ($1.0 million increase).

Gas distribution operating and maintenance expense. The $19.9 million increase in gas distribution operating and maintenance expense in 2005 as compared with the prior year reflects higher bad debt expense ($12.1 million increase), company use gas ($4.0 million increase) and gas storage-related costs ($6.5 million increase in the fourth quarter). The rate order, which became effective in the fourth quarter of 2005, results in certain storage-related gas costs being charged to operating and maintenance expense. Prior to the effective date of the rate order, these storage-related gas costs were charged to cost of gas and passed through to customers as part of the PGA rider. These increases were partially offset by lower net legal and claims expenses ($4.7 million decrease).

Gas distribution operating and maintenance expense for 2004 of $234.9 million was $14.8 million higher than 2003 due primarily to increases in legal defense costs associated with the PBR-related litigation ($5.4 million increase) and payroll costs ($3.5 million increase), adjustments related to customer reimbursements ($3.1 million), higher bad debt expense ($2.7 million increase), due in part to high natural gas prices, and higher compliance costs ($2.6 million increase). These negative factors were partially offset by higher pension credits ($3.6 million increase).

Other gas distribution operating expenses. Property sale gains and losses vary from year-to-year depending upon property sales activity. Property sale gains and losses were insignificant during 2005 and 2003. During 2004, Nicor Gas realized a $5.9 million pretax gain on the sale of land. The company continues to assess its ownership of real estate holdings.
 
Mercury-related costs (recoveries), net reflect the estimated costs, credits and recoveries associated with the company’s mercury inspection and repair program. Net mercury-related costs (recoveries) were insignificant in 2005 and 2004, and approximately $(17.8) million in 2003. The 2003 net recoveries resulted from agreements reached with insurers of independent contractors of Nicor Gas. Additional information about the company’s mercury inspection and repair program is presented in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Mercury.

Shipping operating expenses. Shipping segment operating expenses increased $59.0 million in 2005 as compared with 2004 due primarily to higher transportation-related costs, which include fuel, inland freight, vessel charter, voyage and transportation, and port costs ($37.7 million increase), and higher payroll-related costs ($6.2 million increase). The increases were due to general price increases and increased volumes shipped. Higher legal and audit fees ($5.2 million increase) also contributed to the increase. Included in these amounts were approximately $5.1 million of costs incurred in connection with repatriation of funds and the reorganization of Tropical Shipping to take advantage of the benefits of the Jobs Act.
 
Shipping segment operating expenses increased $29.6 million in 2004 as compared with 2003 due primarily to higher voyage and transportation, inland freight and port costs ($16.0 million increase), payroll and related costs ($4.7 million increase), leased equipment costs ($2.7 million increase) and vessel charter costs ($2.0 million increase). The increases were due primarily to increased volumes shipped.






19

Operating expenses of other energy ventures. The $6.9 million increase in the 2005 operating expenses compared with 2004 was due primarily to higher expenses at Nicor’s energy-related products and services businesses ($7.1 million increase), due largely to higher risk management costs and expense related to new business initiatives, partially offset by the impact of a decreased average number of fixed utility bill management customers.

The $47.4 million increase in the 2004 operating expenses compared with 2003 was due mainly to higher expenses at Nicor’s energy-related products and services businesses ($48.2 million increase), reflecting an increased average number of utility-bill management customers and the higher average cost of gas.

Litigation charges (recoveries), net. In the first quarter of 2005, the company recorded a $0.5 million pretax net recovery which was comprised of a shareholder derivative action settlement ($3.5 million pretax) and a related Directors and Officers (“D&O”) insurance recovery ($4.0 million). During the second quarter of 2005, the company recorded $29.4 million of pretax income related to the recovery from an insurance carrier of costs previously incurred by Nicor in connection with a securities class action and a related shareholder derivative action which were previously settled. In the first quarter of 2004, the company recorded a $38.5 million pretax litigation charge related to an agreement to settle the securities class actions. For more information, see Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Securities Class Actions, Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits and Other.

Other corporate expenses and eliminations. Other corporate operating expenses (income) were $(0.8) million, $5.5 million and $8.3 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, consisting primarily of legal and business development costs.

Intercompany eliminations were $(86.9) million, $(88.4) million and $(58.5) million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and related primarily to utility-bill management products.

Interest expense. Interest expense for 2005 increased $5.6 million over the 2004 period. This increase reflects the impact of higher average interest rates ($6.2 million increase) and higher estimated interest on income tax matters ($3.7 million increase), partially offset by the impact of lower average borrowing levels ($4.8 million decrease).

Interest expense increased $3.9 million in 2004 over 2003 due to the impact of higher average interest rates ($4.4 million increase) and higher estimated interest on income tax matters ($1.8 million increase), partially offset by the impact of lower average borrowing levels ($2.3 million decrease).

Net equity investment income. Net equity investment income increased $3.0 million in 2005 over the 2004 period due primarily to higher results related to low income housing investments ($1.1 million increase) and higher income from Triton Container Investments L.L.C. (“Triton”), a cargo container leasing business ($0.9 million increase).

Equity investment results for 2004 decreased by $9.0 million as compared with 2003 due primarily to the absence of a $9.6 million cash recovery related to Nicor Energy that occurred in 2003. Information related to this investment is more fully described in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Nicor Energy.

Equity investment results include $7.4 million, $6.5 million and $5.5 million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, for Nicor’s share of income from Triton.

Interest income. Interest income increased $3.7 million in 2005 over 2004 due to higher average rates and higher investment balances. The 2004 change in interest income over the 2003 period was insignificant.


20

Income tax expense. The overall effective income tax rate for 2005 decreased to 20.3 percent from the prior year rate of 28.7 percent, due primarily to the 2005 tax benefits recorded in connection with the Jobs Act (approximately $17 million).

The decline in the effective income tax rate to 28.7 percent in 2004 from 35.2 percent in 2003 was primarily a result of lower pretax income (which typically causes a lower effective income tax rate since permanent differences and tax credits are a larger share of pretax income).

Cumulative effect of accounting change. The cumulative effect of a January 1, 2003 required accounting change relates to the application of accrual accounting, rather than fair value accounting, to gas in storage and certain energy-related contracts, such as storage and transportation contracts, at Nicor Enerchange.










































21

 
 
Nicor Inc.
                         
                           
Gas Distribution Statistics 
         
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
                           
Operating revenues (millions)
                         
Sales
                         
Residential 
       
$
2,031.4
 
$
1,625.5
 
$
1,611.9
 
Commercial 
         
453.5
   
349.9
   
351.7
 
Industrial 
         
61.8
   
49.3
   
51.2
 
           
2,546.7
   
2,024.7
   
2,014.8
 
Transportation
                         
Residential 
         
27.9
   
23.6
   
22.7
 
Commercial 
         
73.1
   
69.9
   
71.6
 
Industrial 
         
39.2
   
39.9
   
41.7
 
Other 
         
11.7
   
14.0
   
12.0
 
           
151.9
   
147.4
   
148.0
 
Other revenues
                         
Revenue taxes 
         
156.4
   
143.5
   
134.0
 
Environmental cost recovery 
         
21.0
   
20.6
   
31.3
 
Chicago Hub 
         
11.5
   
7.9
   
7.3
 
Performance-based rate plan 
         
-
   
(1.8
)
 
-
 
Other 
         
22.1
   
19.8
   
16.2
 
           
211.0
   
190.0
   
188.8
 
         
$
2,909.6
 
$
2,362.1
 
$
2,351.6
 
                           
Deliveries (Bcf)
                         
Sales
                         
Residential 
         
200.2
   
204.8
   
214.9
 
Commercial 
         
44.7
   
44.3
   
46.7
 
Industrial 
         
6.3
   
6.4
   
7.0
 
           
251.2
   
255.5
   
268.6
 
Transportation
                         
Residential 
         
18.9
   
16.6
   
16.6
 
Commercial 
         
87.5
   
84.1
   
87.8
 
Industrial 
         
113.0
   
117.0
   
121.2
 
           
219.4
   
217.7
   
225.6
 
           
470.6
   
473.2
   
494.2
 
                           
Year-end customers (thousands)
                         
Sales
                         
Residential 
         
1,796.2
   
1,777.3
   
1,745.2
 
Commercial 
         
120.3
   
116.5
   
114.5
 
Industrial 
         
7.4
   
7.4
   
7.3
 
           
1,923.9
   
1,901.2
   
1,867.0
 
Transportation
                         
Residential 
         
157.1
   
147.9
   
145.1
 
Commercial 
         
58.2
   
59.5
   
58.3
 
Industrial 
         
5.9
   
6.0
   
6.2
 
           
221.2
   
213.4
   
209.6
 
           
2,145.1
   
2,114.6
   
2,076.6
 
                           
Other statistics
                         
Degree days
         
5,783
   
5,637
   
6,068
 
Colder (warmer) than normal*
         
(1
)%
 
(6
)%
 
1
%
Average gas cost per Mcf sold
       
$
8.74
 
$
6.56
 
$
6.24
 
                           
* Normal weather for Nicor Gas' service territory, for purposes of this report, is considered to be about 5,830 degree days per year for 2005 and 6,000 degree days for 2004 and 2003.  On a 6,000 degree day basis, 2005 would have been 4% warmer than normal.
                       
 
22
 

Shipping Statistics
         
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
TEUs shipped (thousands)
 
214.2
     
198.0
     
177.1
 
Average revenue per TEU
$
1,764
   
$
1,569
   
$
1,525
 
                       
At end of period
                     
 
Ports served
 
25
     
24
     
25
 
 
Vessels operated at year-end
 
18
     
20
     
15
 

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

The company believes it has access to adequate resources to meet its needs for capital expenditures, debt redemptions, dividend payments and working capital. These resources include net cash flow from operating activities, access to capital markets, lines of credit and short-term investments.

Operating cash flows. The gas distribution business is highly seasonal and operating cash flow may fluctuate significantly during the year and from year-to-year due to factors such as weather, natural gas prices, the timing of collections from customers, natural gas purchasing, and storage and hedging practices. The company relies on short-term financing to meet seasonal increases in working capital needs. Cash requirements generally increase over the last half of the year due to increases in natural gas purchases, gas in storage and accounts receivable. During the first half of the year, positive cash flow generally results from the sale of gas in storage and the collection of accounts receivable. This cash is typically used to substantially reduce short-term debt during the first half of the year.

Nicor maintains margin accounts related to financial derivative transactions. These margin accounts may cause large fluctuations in cash needs or sources in a relatively short period of time due to daily settlements resulting from changes in natural gas futures prices. The company manages these fluctuations with short-term borrowings and investments.

Net cash flow provided from (used for) operating activities was $206.2 million, $317.7 million and $(12.6) million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in operating cash flow provided in 2005 compared to 2004 is due in part to the impact of higher gas prices on working capital, coupled with the partial repayment of the income tax refund received in 2003, as discussed below. These effects were partially offset by the $29.9 million of Directors and Officers (“D&O”) net insurance recoveries, including earnings thereon, received during 2005 related to settlement costs incurred by Nicor in connection with a securities class action and a related shareholder derivative action, and the absence of the $38.5 million pretax litigation charge in 2004 related to an agreement to settle the securities class action litigation.

Operating cash flow for 2003 was negative due primarily to changes in working capital items in the gas distribution segment. Two decisions in 2003 were the primary factors underlying the working capital changes. First, the company significantly increased the quantity of owned gas in storage at December 31, 2003 as compared to December 31, 2002. In addition, the company chose to fund a significant portion of those purchases through short-term borrowings (which are shown outside the operating section, in the financing section, of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows) instead of through accounts payable. As noted in the financing activities section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the company had increased its short-term debt borrowing capacity in anticipation of these two and other factors (including higher gas costs), to accommodate the funding of these decisions.





23


In 2003, Nicor received an income tax refund of approximately $100 million attributable to a tax loss carryback associated with a change in tax accounting method (which increased its deferred income tax liability), subject to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) review and approval as part of normal ongoing audits. Through December 31, 2004, the total current tax benefits previously recorded under this accounting method approximated $135 million (amounts recorded were offset by increases to the deferred tax liability with no net effect on reported net federal income tax expense). In 2005, the IRS revised the regulations pertaining to the aforementioned tax accounting method. The new regulations require repayment in 2005 and 2006 of amounts previously taken as current tax deductions. As a result of this revision, the company reclassified from deferred to current income tax expense approximately $67 million, reflecting the amount repaid during 2005. The company expects to repay the remaining amounts during 2006. The anticipated repayment is expected to have no direct impact on earnings and no material impact on the company’s financial condition.

Investing activities. Net cash flow used for investing activities was $154.7 million, $204.7 million and $186.0 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Capital expenditures. Capital expenditures by business segment are presented below (in millions):


 
Estimated
                       
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                               
Gas distribution
$
175
   
$
188
   
$
175
   
$
173
 
Shipping
 
16
     
11
     
9
     
6
 
Other energy ventures
 
7
     
3
     
3
     
2
 
 
$
198
   
$
202
   
$
187
   
$
181
 

Gas distribution capital expenditures for 2005 increased over 2004 due primarily to increased storage system expenditures attributable to the acquisition of a storage compressor (about $9 million increase). Capital expenditures in the gas distribution segment were nearly unchanged for 2004 compared with 2003 as increased costs in 2004 for information technology system improvements (about $8 million increase) were largely offset by adjustments related to customer reimbursements (about $3 million), the absence of expenditures related to a 2003 service outage (about $2 million decrease) and reduced storage system expenditures (about $2 million decrease).

Gas distribution segment capital expenditures are expected to decrease in 2006 versus 2005 due to the absence of expenditures related to the acquisition of a storage compressor in 2005 and a reduction in costs for information technology system improvements. In early 2006, the company is planning to implement a new customer care and billing system.

Shipping segment capital expenditures for 2005 increased $2 million over 2004 due primarily to the purchase of freight handling equipment. Shipping segment capital expenditures for 2004 increased $3 million over 2003 due primarily to the purchase of freight handling equipment and facilities renovations.  

Capital expenditures in the Shipping segment are expected to increase in 2006 versus 2005 due primarily to facilities expansion, partially offset by lower expenditures related to freight handling equipment.

Additional investing activities. Cash provided by other investing activities in 2005 was approximately $61.5 million higher than in the prior year due primarily to an increase of proceeds from the 2005 sale of various investments coupled with the absence of $21.8 million of purchases of available-for-sale securities in 2004. In 2004, Nicor Gas also realized net proceeds of $7.6 million on the sale of land.



24

Nicor invested $10 million in 2003 in Triton. No investment was made in 2005 and 2004. Nicor’s equity investment in this business at December 31, 2005 was $92.9 million.

Nicor’s equity investment in Nicor Energy was written off during 2002. During 2003, Nicor recorded gains of $9.6 million upon the receipt of cash from Nicor Energy. Additional information about transactions with Nicor Energy is provided within the Nicor Energy section of Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies. In 2003, Nicor Services acquired an existing heating, ventilation and air conditioning business. The purchase was made with shares of Nicor common stock.

Financing activities. Nicor Gas has credit ratings that are among the highest in the gas distribution industry. The current credit ratings for Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas are as follows:

 
     
Standard
& Poor’s
 
Moody’s
 
Fitch
Nicor Inc.
             
Commercial Paper
   
A-1+
 
P-1
 
F-1
Senior Unsecured Debt
   
AA-
 
n/a
 
A
Corporate Credit Rating
   
AA
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
Nicor Gas
             
Commercial Paper
   
A-1+
 
P-1
 
F-1+
First Mortgage Bonds
   
AA
 
Aa3
 
AA-
Senior Unsecured Debt
   
AA-
 
A1
 
A+
Corporate Credit Rating
   
AA
 
n/a
 
n/a

During 2005, Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”), Moody’s and Fitch reaffirmed Nicor Inc.’s and Nicor Gas’ credit ratings. In June 2004, Fitch upgraded the ratings outlook to stable from negative while in December 2004, S&P changed its outlook from stable to negative. Moody’s outlook has been negative since April of 2003.

Nicor’s debt-related financial statistics at December 31 include:

   
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
Long-term obligations, net of current maturities,
as a percent of capitalization
 
37.5
%
 
39.9
%
 
39.7
%
Times interest earned, before income taxes
 
4.5
   
3.5
   
5.5
 

Long-term debt. The company typically uses the net proceeds from long-term debt for refinancing outstanding debt, for construction programs to the extent not provided by internally generated funds, and for general corporate purposes.

At December 31, 2005, Nicor Gas had the capacity to issue approximately $375 million of First Mortgage Bonds under the terms of its indenture, of which $75 million was available for issuance under a July 2001 shelf registration filing. Nicor believes it is in compliance with its debt covenants and believes it will continue to remain so. Nicor’s long-term debt agreements do not include ratings triggers or material adverse change provisions.

In December 2005, Tropical Shipping obtained a $40 million two-year senior unsecured term loan which was used along with cash available from foreign subsidiaries to fund the repatriation of $132 million of its cumulative undistributed foreign earnings under the provisions of the Jobs Act. The term loan bears


25

interest at London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.50 percent per annum. For the purpose of obtaining a lower borrowing rate, the term loan was guaranteed by Nicor.

As a result of the repatriation, Nicor has approximately $83 million of cash it expects to use for qualifying investment uses under the Jobs Act. Qualifying investment uses include funding of United States-based employee-related costs, capital investments, and advertising and marketing expenditures.

In 2003, Nicor Gas issued the following First Mortgage Bonds: $50 million due in 2023 at 5.80 percent, $50 million due in 2032 at 5.90 percent and $50 million due in 2033 at 5.90 percent. Retirements of First Mortgage Bonds in 2003 were as follows: $50 million due in 2003 at 5.75 percent and $50 million due in 2027 at 7.375 percent.

In April 2003, Nicor Gas refinanced $50 million of 3 percent unsecured notes due in April 2003 with $50 million of 1.6 percent unsecured notes due and paid in October 2003.

Short-term debt. The company relies upon short-term financing to meet temporary operating cash flow needs resulting from seasonal changes in working capital. In September 2005, Nicor and Nicor Gas established two revolving credit facilities totaling $1 billion with major domestic and foreign banks, which replaced the $500 million, three-year revolver, which was to expire in September 2007 and the $400 million, 210-day seasonal revolver, which expired in April 2005. The new replacement facilities, which serve as backup for the issuance of commercial paper, consist of a $600 million, 5-year revolver, expiring September 2010, available to Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas, and a $400 million, 210-day seasonal revolver, expiring in April 2006, available to Nicor Gas.

Common stock. Nicor maintained its quarterly common stock dividend rate during 2005 of $0.465 per common share. The company paid dividends on its common stock of $82.1 million, $82.0 million and $81.7 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Nicor currently has no contractual or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends.

In 2001, Nicor announced a $50 million common stock repurchase program. Purchases may be made as market conditions permit through open market transactions and to the extent cash flow is available after other cash needs and investment opportunities. There were no purchases under this program in 2003, 2004 and 2005, and at December 31, 2005, approximately $22 million remained authorized for the repurchase of common stock.

Preferred Stock. On January 19, 2006, Nicor’s Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends of $0.56 per share and $0.625 per share on the 4.48% preferred stock and the 5.00% convertible preferred stock, respectively, which are payable May 1, 2006 to stockholders of record as of March 31, 2006. On November 3, 2005 Nicor redeemed 20,062 shares of 5% Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock, $50 par value, at a per share redemption price of $51 plus accrued and unpaid dividends.

Off-balance sheet arrangements. Nicor has certain guarantees, as further described in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 18 - Guarantees and Indemnities. The company believes that it is not probable that these guarantees will have a material effect on its financial condition.










26

Contractual obligations. As of December 31, 2005, Nicor had contractual obligations with payments due as follows (in millions):
 
Payments due by period
   
Less
than 1
year
 
 
1-3
years
 
 
3-5
years
 
More
than 5
years
 
 
 
Total
                     
Purchase obligations
 
$1,002.6
 
$757.4
 
$ 87.5
 
$ 16.0
 
$1,863.5
Long-term debt
 
50.0
 
115.0
 
50.0
 
325.0
 
540.0
Fixed interest on
long-term debt
 
 
30.4
 
 
53.8
 
 
41.5
 
 
245.9
 
 
371.6
Variable interest on
long-term debt
 
 
2.0
 
 
2.0
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
4.0
Operating leases
 
36.5
 
51.4
 
15.1
 
16.6
 
119.6
Other long-term obligations
 
2.6
 
3.0
 
.6
 
.6
 
6.8
   
$1,124.1
 
$982.6
 
$194.7
 
$604.1
 
$2,905.5

Purchase obligations consist primarily of natural gas purchase agreements, and natural gas transportation and storage contracts in the gas distribution and wholesale natural gas marketing business segments. Natural gas purchase agreements include obligations to purchase natural gas at future market prices, calculated using December 31, 2005 New York Mercantile Exchange futures prices.

Operating leases are primarily for vessels, containers and equipment in the shipping segment, office space and equipment in the gas distribution segment and office space at other energy ventures. Tropical Shipping has certain equipment operating leases which include purchase and/or renewal options, at fair market amounts at the time of purchase or renewal. Rental expense under operating leases was $37.2 million, $27.5 million and $23.7 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in rent expense from 2004 to 2005 was primarily driven by higher charter rates and the addition of equipment leases in the shipping segment.

Other. Restrictions imposed by regulatory agencies and loan agreements limiting the amount of subsidiary net assets that can be transferred to Nicor are not expected to have a material impact on the company’s ability to meet its cash obligations.

OUTLOOK

Gas Distribution. In 2006, results will reflect a full year of the rate increase granted in 2005. The rate increase received in 2005 was based on estimates for operating and maintenance expense, depreciation expense, interest expense and other costs. To the extent actual costs incurred vary from amounts recovered through base rates, operating income will be impacted. Since receipt of the rate order, natural gas prices have been extremely volatile and are currently higher than estimates used in the rate case. In 2006, the impact of such increases could substantially offset the impacts of the rate increase. In addition, fluctuations from normal weather have the potential to significantly impact 2006 operating income. The ICC’s rehearing on certain rate case issues, the PBR plan review, the related PGA review and other contingencies could significantly affect future operating results, but the outcomes are not estimable.

Operating and maintenance expenses at Nicor Gas are expected to continue to rise in part because of the full year impact of the 2005 rate order which requires that certain storage-related costs will now be charged to operating and maintenance expense rather than being recorded in cost of gas (as such costs were passed through to customers as part of the PGA rider prior to the implementation of the late 2005 rate order). In addition, the company continues to be impacted by fluctuations in natural gas prices and the related impact on bad debt expense, company use gas, storage-related and other costs.

27


Shipping. Strong economic conditions in the Caribbean and the Bahamas are expected to continue into 2006. Nicor anticipates that 2006 pretax operating results in the shipping segment will be comparable to 2005. Effective January 1, 2006, Tropical Shipping has reorganized its operations to take advantage of provisions of the Jobs Act to minimize the federal income taxes on its ongoing earnings. To the extent shipping earnings are not repatriated to the United States, such earnings are not expected to be subject to current federal taxation. In addition, to the extent such earnings are determined to be indefinitely reinvested offshore, no deferred income tax expense will be recorded by the company.

Other Energy Ventures. Nicor anticipates 2006 results in the other energy ventures will be improved compared to 2005. This projection does not reflect the variability in earnings due to fair value accounting adjustments in its wholesale natural gas marketing business that could occur because of additional volatility in the natural gas markets.

CONTINGENCIES

The following contingencies of Nicor are in various stages of investigation or disposition. Although in some cases the company is unable to estimate the amount of loss reasonably possible in addition to any amounts already recognized, it is possible that the resolution of these contingencies, either individually or in aggregate, will require the company to take charges against, or will result in reductions in, future earnings. It is the opinion of management that the resolution of these contingencies, either individually or in aggregate, could be material to earnings in a particular period but is not expected to have a material adverse impact on Nicor’s liquidity or financial condition.

Performance-based rate (“PBR”) plan. Nicor Gas’ PBR plan for natural gas costs went into effect in 2000 and was terminated by the company effective January 1, 2003. Under the PBR plan, Nicor Gas’ total gas supply costs were compared to a market-sensitive benchmark. Savings and losses relative to the benchmark were determined annually and shared equally with sales customers. The PBR is currently under ICC review.

There are allegations that the company acted improperly in connection with the PBR plan, and the ICC and others are reviewing these allegations. On June 27, 2002 the Citizens Utility Board (“CUB”) filed a motion to reopen the record in the ICC’s proceedings to review the PBR plan (the “ICC Proceedings”). As a result of the motion to reopen, Nicor Gas, the Cook County State’s Attorney Office (“CCSAO”), the staff of the ICC and CUB entered into a stipulation providing for additional discovery. The Illinois Attorney General’s Office (“IAGO”) has also intervened in this matter. In addition, the IAGO issued Civil Investigation Demands (“CIDs”) to CUB and the ICC staff. The CIDs ordered that CUB and the ICC staff produce all documents relating to any claims that Nicor Gas may have presented, or caused to be presented, false information related to its PBR plan. Parties who were plaintiffs in a dismissed class action proceeding against the company could potentially intervene in these proceedings. The company has committed to cooperate fully in the reviews of the PBR plan.

In response to these allegations, on July 18, 2002, the Nicor Board of Directors appointed a special committee of independent, non-management directors to conduct an inquiry into issues surrounding natural gas purchases, sales, transportation, storage and such other matters as may come to the attention of the special committee in the course of its investigation. The special committee presented the report of its counsel (“Report”) to Nicor’s Board of Directors on October 28, 2002. A copy of the report is available at the Nicor website and has been previously produced to all parties in the ICC Proceedings.

In response, the Nicor Board of Directors directed the company’s management to, among other things, make appropriate adjustments to account for, and fully address, the adverse consequences to ratepayers of the items noted in the Report, and conduct a detailed study of the adequacy of internal accounting and regulatory controls. The adjustments were made in prior years’ financial statements resulting in a $24.8 million liability. Included in such $24.8 million liability is a $4.1 million loss contingency. A $1.8

28

million adjustment to the previously recorded liability, which is discussed below, was made in the third quarter of 2004 increasing the recorded liability to $26.6 million. In addition, Nicor Gas estimates that there is $26.9 million due to the company from the 2002 PBR plan year, which has not been recognized in the financial statements due to uncertainties surrounding the PBR plan. The net of these items and interest income on certain components results in a $1.0 million reimbursement the company is seeking as of December 31, 2005, pending resolution of the proceedings discussed below. By the end of 2003 the company completed steps to correct the weaknesses and deficiencies identified in the detailed study of the adequacy of internal controls.

Pursuant to the agreement of all parties, including the company, the ICC re-opened the 1999 and 2000 purchased gas adjustment filings for review of certain transactions related to the PBR plan and consolidated the reviews of the 1999-2002 purchased gas adjustment filings with the PBR plan review.

On February 5, 2003, the CCSAO and CUB filed a motion for $27 million in sanctions against the company in the ICC Proceedings. In that motion, CCSAO and CUB alleged that Nicor Gas’ responses to certain CUB data requests were false. Also on February 5, 2003, CUB stated in a press release that, in addition to $27 million in sanctions, it would seek additional refunds to consumers. On March 5, 2003, the ICC staff filed a response brief in support of CUB’s motion for sanctions. On May 1, 2003, the Administrative Law Judges issued a ruling denying CUB and CCSAO’s motion for sanctions. CUB has filed an appeal of the motion for sanctions with the ICC, and the ICC has indicated that it will not rule on the appeal until the final disposition of the ICC Proceedings. It is not possible to determine how the ICC will resolve the claims of CCSAO, CUB or other parties to the ICC Proceedings.

In November 2003, the ICC staff, CUB, CCSAO and the IAGO filed their respective direct testimony in the ICC Proceedings. The ICC staff is seeking refunds to customers of approximately $108 million and CUB and CCSAO were jointly seeking refunds to customers of approximately $143 million. The IAGO direct testimony alleges adjustments in a range from $145 million to $190 million. The IAGO testimony as filed is presently unclear as to the amount which IAGO seeks to have refunded to customers. On February 27, 2004 the above referenced intervenors filed their rebuttal testimony in the ICC Proceedings. In such rebuttal testimony, CUB and CCSAO amended the alleged amount to be refunded to customers from approximately $143 million to $190 million. Nicor Gas filed rebuttal testimony in January 2004, which is consistent with the findings of the special committee Report. Nicor Gas seeks a reimbursement of approximately $1 million as referenced above. The parties to the ICC Proceedings have agreed to a stay of the evidentiary hearings on this matter in order to undertake additional third party discovery from Entergy-Koch Trading, LP (“EKT”), a natural gas, storage and transportation trader and consultant with whom Nicor did business under the PBR plan.

During the course of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigation discussed below, the company became aware of additional information relating to the activities of individuals affecting the PBR plan for the period from 1999 through 2002, including information consisting of third party documents and recordings of telephone conversations from EKT. Review of additional information completed in the third quarter of 2004 resulted in the $1.8 million adjustment to the previously recorded liability referenced above.

Although the Report of the special committee’s counsel did not find that there was criminal activity or fraud, a review of this additional information (which was not available to the independent counsel who prepared the Report) and re-interviews of certain Nicor Gas personnel in 2004 indicated that certain former Nicor Gas personnel may have engaged in potentially fraudulent conduct regarding the PBR plan in violation of company policy, and in possible violation of SEC rules and applicable law. Further, certain former Nicor Gas personnel also may have attempted to conceal their conduct in connection with an ICC review of the PBR plan. The company continues to cooperate with the SEC, the U.S. Attorney’s office and the ICC on this matter. The company has reviewed all third party information it has obtained


29

and will continue to review any additional third party information the company may obtain. The company terminated four employees in connection with this matter in the third quarter of 2004.

Nicor is unable to predict the outcome of any of the foregoing reviews or the company’s potential exposure thereunder. Because the PBR plan and historical gas costs are still under ICC review, the final outcome could be materially different than the amounts reflected in the company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2005.

Nicor Energy. Significant events occurred in 2002 and 2003 relating to Nicor’s 50 percent interest in Nicor Energy. Nicor Energy, a retail energy marketing joint venture owned 50 percent by Nicor and 50 percent by Dynegy Marketing and Trade, has been dissolved. Information about these events is presented within Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Nicor Energy.

On December 10, 2003, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois indicted three former employees of Nicor Energy and an outside lawyer for Nicor Energy. The indictments alleged that the defendants fraudulently deprived Nicor Energy of their honest services and caused a loss to investors in Nicor Inc. and Dynegy Inc. During the time period covered by the indictments, Nicor Energy was a stand alone entity with its own management and was operated independently from Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas. None of the individuals indicted are employees of Nicor Inc. or Nicor Gas nor were they at the time of the charged conduct. The three former employees of Nicor Energy have pled guilty to certain charges. Separately, on December 10, 2003, the SEC filed its own civil enforcement action against the same three former employees and one additional former employee of Nicor Energy. While Nicor is unable to predict the final outcome of these matters, the resolution of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the company’s cash flow, financial condition or results of operations.

SEC and U.S. Attorney Inquiries. In 2002, the staff of the SEC informed Nicor and Nicor Energy that the SEC is conducting a formal inquiry regarding both the PBR plan and Nicor Energy. A representative of the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois has notified Nicor that that office is conducting an inquiry on the same matters that the SEC is investigating, and a grand jury is also reviewing these matters. In April 2004, Nicor was advised by the SEC Division of Enforcement that it intended to recommend to the SEC that it bring a civil injunctive action against Nicor, alleging that Nicor violated Sections 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC may also seek injunctive relief, disgorgement and civil penalties. The SEC staff invited Nicor to make a formal response (known as a Wells Submission) with respect to the proposed recommendation. In June 2004, Nicor filed its Wells Submission with the SEC. In addition, in connection with the SEC’s invitation to the company to make a Wells Submission, the SEC informed the company of additional sources of information relating to activities affecting the PBR plan, the status of which is addressed in detail in the PBR section set forth above. In August 2004, Nicor withdrew its Wells Submission in light of its continuing review of the additional sources of newly available information referenced above. Nicor continues in its efforts to resolve this matter with the SEC and has requested that the SEC allow Nicor to file an updated Wells Submission if necessary. Nicor is unable to predict the outcome of these inquiries or Nicor’s potential exposure related thereto and has not recorded a liability associated with the outcome of these contingencies.

Securities Class Actions. Nicor and certain of its executives were defendants in a consolidated class action lawsuit. Information about the settlement of this action is presented within Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Securities Class Actions.

Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits. Certain former Nicor executives and members of its Board of Directors were defendants in a consolidated derivative lawsuit. The parties reached an agreement to settle the action which was approved by the court presiding over the matter on March 29, 2005. The settlement

30

became final in the second quarter of 2005, when all appeal rights expired. In connection with the derivative settlement, in the first quarter of 2005, Nicor’s excess insurance carrier paid $4 million to Nicor to settle certain claims Nicor had asserted against it arising out of the derivative action and related class action securities litigation. Pursuant to the terms of the derivative settlement, Nicor paid $3.5 million of that $4 million to plaintiff’s attorneys to reimburse them for the fees and costs expended in pursuing the derivative action. The $0.5 million net of these payments was reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the first quarter of 2005. Further information about this lawsuit is presented within Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits. See also the “Other contingencies” section for information on additional insurance recoveries.

Mercury. Future operating results may be impacted by adjustments to the company’s estimated mercury liability or by related recoveries. Additional information about mercury contingencies is presented in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Mercury.

Manufactured gas plant sites. The company is conducting environmental investigations and remedial activities at former manufactured gas plant sites. Additional information about these sites is presented in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Manufactured Gas Plant Sites.

Fixed Bill Service. Nicor Services was a defendant in a purported class action. On October 7, 2005, the Circuit Court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed class. Information about this lawsuit is presented within Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Fixed Bill Service.

Gas Line ComfortGuard Service. Nicor, Nicor Gas and Nicor Services were defendants in a purported class action that was settled on an individual basis with the named plaintiff in the first quarter of 2006. Information about this lawsuit is presented within Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 - Contingencies - Gas Line ComfortGuard Service.

Other contingencies. The company is involved in legal or administrative proceedings before various courts and agencies with respect to general claims, rates, taxes, environmental, gas cost prudence reviews and other matters. See Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 8 - Income and Other Taxes and Note 19 - Contingencies.

On April 27, 2004 one of Nicor’s Directors and Officers (“D&O”) insurance carriers agreed to pay $29.0 million to a third party escrow agent on behalf of Nicor and its insured directors and officers to be used to satisfy Nicor directors’ and officers’ liabilities and expenses associated with claims asserted against them in a securities class action, the shareholder derivative lawsuit described above and related matters, with any remaining balance to be paid to Nicor. Under the terms of the derivative settlement, once the settlement became final (because all appeal rights had expired), the escrow was terminated and the $29.0 million, plus earnings of approximately $0.4 million, held by the escrow agent was paid to Nicor in the second quarter of 2005. These recoveries have been recorded in “Litigation charges (recoveries), net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. In the second half of 2005, Nicor received $2.8 million of additional insurance proceeds related to legal defense costs. These additional proceeds have been recorded in “Other corporate expenses and eliminations” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. Nicor also continues to seek reimbursement for other expenses from its excess insurance carrier in connection with the same matters but is unable to predict the outcome of this matter and therefore no potential insurance recoveries have been reflected in the financial statements.

In addition, see Item 1A - Risk Factors and Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

31

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Nicor prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which regularly require Nicor’s management to exercise judgment in the selection and application of accounting methods. The application of accounting methods includes making estimates using subjective assumptions and judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain.

The use of estimates and the selection of accounting policies affect Nicor’s reported results and financial condition. The company has adopted several significant accounting policies and is required to make significant accounting estimates that are important to understanding its financial statements. These significant policies and estimates are described throughout Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Although there are numerous areas in which Nicor’s management makes significant accounting estimates, it believes its critical estimates are those that require management’s most difficult and subjective or complex judgments. Nicor’s management has a practice of reviewing its critical accounting estimates and policy decisions with the audit committee of its board of directors. Its critical estimates typically involve loss contingencies, derivative instruments, pension and other postretirement benefits, income taxes, credit risk and unbilled revenues because they are estimates which could materially impact Nicor’s financial statements.

Loss contingencies. Nicor and its subsidiaries record contingent losses as liabilities when a loss is both probable and the amount or range of loss, including related legal defense costs, is reasonably estimable. When only a range of potential loss is estimable, the company records a liability for the minimum anticipated loss. Nicor and its subsidiaries and affiliates are involved in various legal and regulatory proceedings and are exposed to various loss contingencies. These loss contingencies are in some cases resolved in stages over time, estimates may change significantly from period to period, and the company’s ultimate obligations may differ materially from its recorded amounts. Of particular note is the PBR plan contingency at Nicor Gas and the United States SEC and U.S. Attorney inquiries described in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note - 19 Contingencies.

Derivative instruments. The rules for determining whether a contract meets the definition of a derivative instrument or qualifies for hedge accounting treatment are numerous and complex. The treatment of a single contract may vary from period to period depending upon accounting elections, changes in management’s assessment of the likelihood of future hedged transactions or new interpretations of accounting rules. As a result, management judgment is required in the determination of the appropriate accounting treatment. In addition, the estimated fair value of derivative instruments may change significantly from period to period depending upon market projections, and changes in hedge effectiveness may impact the accounting treatment. These determinations and changes in estimates may have a material impact on reported results.

Pension and other postretirement benefits. The company’s cost of providing postretirement benefits is dependent upon various factors and assumptions, including life expectancies, the discount rate used in determining the projected benefit obligation, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the long-term rate of compensation increase and anticipated health care costs. Changes in these assumptions typically do not have a significant impact on the expenses recorded from year to year. However, actual experience in any one period, particularly the actual return on plan assets, often varies significantly from these mostly long-term assumptions. When cumulatively significant, the gains and losses generated from such variances are amortized over the remaining service lives of employees covered by the plans (approximately 12 years for the pension plan and 14 years for the health care plan). Additional information is presented in Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9 - Postretirement Benefits, including plan asset investment allocation, estimated future benefit payments,


32

general descriptions of the plans, significant assumptions, the impact of certain changes in assumptions, and significant changes in estimates.

The company’s estimated postretirement benefit cost included in operating income was $9.6 million, $9.1 million and $13.9 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Nicor Gas expects to record postretirement benefit cost for 2006 of $5.5 million. Actuarial assumptions affecting 2006 include an expected rate of return on plan assets of 8.50 percent, consistent with the prior year, and a discount rate of 5.50 percent compared with 5.75 percent a year earlier. The 5.50 percent discount rate was determined independently for the pension and health-care plans based on bond matching models, using non-callable, high quality bonds (AA- or better), whose expected cash flows match the timing and amount of future benefit payments of the plans.

Income taxes. A deferred income tax liability is not recorded on undistributed foreign earnings that are expected in management’s judgment to be indefinitely reinvested offshore. After accounting for the repatriation, Nicor has remaining at December 31, 2005 approximately $12 million of deferred income tax liabilities related to approximately $34 million of cumulative undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. Nicor has not recorded deferred income taxes of approximately $18 million on approximately $51 million of cumulative undistributed foreign earnings that are expected in management’s judgment to be indefinitely reinvested offshore. Changes in management’s investment or repatriation plans or circumstances could result in a different deferred income tax liability.

Credit risk. Nicor’s subsidiaries and affiliates are required to estimate credit risk in establishing allowances for doubtful accounts and in estimating the fair values of certain derivative instruments with counterparty credit risk being an especially difficult and critical judgment. Actual credit losses could vary materially from Nicor’s estimates. Nicor’s allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $31.5 million, $21.9 million and $21.2 million, respectively, as presented on Schedule II in Item 15 - Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

Unbilled revenues. Nicor Gas estimates revenues for natural gas deliveries not yet billed to customers from the last billing date to month-end (“unbilled revenues”). Unbilled revenue estimates are dependent upon a number of customer-usage factors which require management judgment, including weather factors. These revenue estimates are adjusted when actual billings occur, and variances in estimates can be material. Estimated unbilled revenues for Nicor Gas at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $300.4 million, $204.4 million and $139.0 million, respectively.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued the following new pronouncements that have not yet been adopted by Nicor as of December 31, 2005.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. The company has not yet adopted this pronouncement. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. For more information, see Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 2 - New Accounting Pronouncements.

CAUTION CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document includes certain forward-looking statements about the expectations of Nicor and its subsidiaries and affiliates. Although Nicor believes these statements are based on reasonable assumptions, actual results may vary materially from stated expectations. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “planned,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “project,”

33

“estimate,” “ultimate,” or similar phrases. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the company’s forward-looking statements due to the direct or indirect effects of legal contingencies (including litigation) and the resolution of those issues, including the effects of an ICC review and SEC and U.S. Attorney inquiries, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

Other factors that could cause materially different results include, but are not limited to, weather conditions; natural disasters; natural gas and other fuel prices; fair value accounting adjustments; inventory valuation; health care costs; insurance costs or recoveries; legal costs; borrowing needs; interest rates; credit conditions; economic and market conditions; tourism and construction in the Bahamas and Caribbean region; energy conservation; legislative and regulatory actions; tax rulings or audit results; asset sales; significant unplanned capital needs; future mercury-related charges or credits; changes in accounting principles, interpretations, methods, judgments or estimates; performance of major suppliers and contractors; labor relations; and acts of terrorism.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this filing. Nicor undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revision to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this filing.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Nicor is exposed to market risk in the normal course of its business operations, including the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in natural gas and fuel commodity prices, and interest rates. It is Nicor’s practice to manage these risks utilizing derivative instruments and other methods, as deemed appropriate.

Commodity price risk. With regard to commodity price risk, the company has established policies and procedures governing the management of such risks and the use of derivative instruments to hedge its exposure to such risks. Company management oversees compliance with such policies and procedures. The company utilizes various techniques to limit, measure and monitor market risk, including limits based on volume, dollar amounts, maturity, and in some cases value at risk (“VaR”).

VaR is the potential loss for an instrument or portfolio from adverse changes in market factors, for a specified time period and at a specified confidence level. The company has established exposure limits at such a level that material adverse economic results are not expected. The company’s commodity price risk policies and procedures continue to evolve with its businesses and are subject to ongoing review and modification.

In accordance with SEC disclosure requirements, Nicor performs sensitivity analyses to assess the potential loss in earnings based upon a hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in market prices. Management does not believe that sensitivity analyses alone provide an accurate or reliable method for monitoring and controlling risks and therefore also relies on the experience and judgment of its management to revise strategies and adjust positions as deemed necessary. Losses in excess of the amounts determined in sensitivity analyses could occur if market prices exceed the 10 percent shift used for the analyses.

As a regulated utility, Nicor Gas’ exposure to market risk caused by changes in commodity prices is substantially mitigated because of Illinois rate regulation allowing for the recovery of prudently incurred natural gas supply costs from customers. However, substantial changes in natural gas prices may impact Nicor Gas’ earnings by increasing or decreasing the cost of gas used by the company, storage-related costs, bad debt expense, and other operating and financing expenses. The company purchases about 4 billion cubic feet (“Bcf”) of natural gas annually for its own use and to cover storage-related inventory costs. The level of natural gas prices may also impact customer gas consumption and therefore gas distribution margin.


34

The actual impact of natural gas price fluctuations on Nicor Gas’ earnings is dependent upon several factors, including the company’s hedging practices. At December 31, 2005, Nicor Gas had hedged a significant portion of its forecasted 2006 company use and storage-related gas costs primarily through the use of fixed-price purchase agreements.

Nicor’s other energy businesses are subject to natural gas commodity price risk, arising primarily from purchase and sale agreements, transportation agreements, natural gas inventories and utility-bill management arrangements. Derivative instruments such as futures, options, forwards and swaps may be used to hedge these risks. Based on Nicor’s other energy businesses unhedged positions at December 31, 2005, a 10 percent adverse change in natural gas prices would have decreased Nicor’s earnings at December 31, 2005 and 2004 by about $1.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2005, Nicor Enerchange, Nicor’s wholesale natural gas marketing business, held derivative contracts with the following asset (liability) fair values, net (in millions):

 
     
Maturity 
 
Source of Fair Value
 
Total
Fair Value
   
Less than
1 Year
   
1 to 3
Years
   
3 to 5
Years
 
 
Prices actively quoted
$
(1.2
)
$
(1.1
)
$
(.1
)
$
-
 
Prices based on pricing models
 
.4
   
.4
   
-
   
-
 
Total
$
(.8
)
$
(.7
)
$
(.1
)
$
-
 

Tropical Shipping’s objective is to substantially mitigate its exposure to higher fuel costs through fuel surcharges.

Credit risk. Nicor Gas has a diversified customer base, which limits its exposure to concentrations of credit risk in any one industry or income class. The company believes that it maintains prudent credit policies, subject to ICC regulations. Customers also have options to help them manage their bills, such as energy assistance programs for low-income customers and a budget payment plan that spreads gas bills more evenly throughout the year. The company is also exposed to credit risk in the event a counterparty, customer or supplier defaults on a contract to pay for or deliver product at agreed-upon terms and conditions. To manage this risk, the company has established procedures to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties, to require guarantees or collateral back-up, and to limit its exposure to any one counterparty. Nicor also, in some instances, enters into netting arrangements to mitigate counterparty credit risk.

Interest rate risk. Nicor is exposed to changes in interest rates. The company manages its interest rate risk by issuing primarily fixed-rate long-term debt with varying maturities, refinancing certain debt and, at times, hedging the interest rate on anticipated borrowings. If market rates were to hypothetically increase by 10 percent from Nicor’s weighted-average floating interest rate on commercial paper and on Tropical Shipping’s $40 million two-year senior unsecured term loan, interest expense would have increased causing Nicor’s earnings to decrease by approximately $0.3 million if the two-year term loan had been outstanding for the full year. For further information about debt securities, interest rates and fair values, see Item 8 - Financial Statements - Consolidated Statements of Capitalization, and Item 8 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 6 - Short-Term and Long-Term Debt and Note 7 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments.






35

 
Nicor Inc.

Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
   
Page
     
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
37
     
Financial Statements:
 
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations 
39
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 
40
     
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets 
41
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Capitalization 
42
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Common Equity 
43
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 
43
     
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 
44

 


 


























36

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Nicor Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Nicor Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, common equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. We also have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule, an opinion on management’s assessment, and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



37

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (concluded)

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2005 the Company changed its method of accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations.  As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2003 the Company changed its method of accounting for energy trading activities and gas inventories.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 2006































38

 
Nicor Inc.
                   
                     
Consolidated Statements of Operations
                   
(millions, except per share data)
                   
Year ended December 31
 
     
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
Operating revenues
                   
Gas distribution (includes revenue taxes of $156.4,
                   
$143.5, and $134.0, respectively)
 
$
2,909.6
 
$
2,362.1
 
$
2,351.6
 
Shipping
   
378.5
   
310.7
   
272.2
 
Other energy ventures
   
157.0
   
155.3
   
96.5
 
Corporate and eliminations
   
(87.3
)
 
(88.4
)
 
(57.6
)
Total operating revenues
   
3,357.8
   
2,739.7
   
2,662.7
 
                     
Operating expenses
                   
Gas distribution
                   
Cost of gas
   
2,212.4
   
1,695.0
   
1,692.7
 
Operating and maintenance
   
254.8
   
234.9
   
220.1
 
Depreciation
   
154.5
   
148.8
   
143.5
 
Taxes, other than income taxes
   
171.0
   
158.5
   
147.3
 
Mercury-related costs (recoveries), net
   
.4
   
-
   
(17.8
)
Property sale gains
   
(.4
)
 
(5.9
)
 
(.4
)
Shipping
   
338.1
   
279.1
   
249.5
 
Other energy ventures
   
142.9
   
136.0
   
88.6
 
Litigation charges (recoveries), net
   
(29.9
)
 
38.5
   
-
 
Other corporate expenses and eliminations
   
(87.7
)
 
(82.9
)
 
(50.2
)
Total operating expenses
   
3,156.1
   
2,602.0
   
2,473.3
 
                     
Operating income
   
201.7
   
137.7
   
189.4
 
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
   
46.8
   
41.2
   
37.3
 
Equity investment income, net
   
9.3
   
6.3
   
15.3
 
Interest income
   
6.0
   
2.3
   
1.9
 
Other income, net
   
.8
   
.2
   
.1
 
                     
Income before income taxes and cumulative
                   
effect of accounting change
   
171.0
   
105.3
   
169.4
 
Income tax expense, net of benefits
   
34.7
   
30.2
   
59.6
 
                     
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
   
136.3
   
75.1
   
109.8
 
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of
                   
$3.0 income tax benefit
   
-
   
-
   
(4.5
)
                     
Net income
   
136.3
   
75.1
   
105.3
 
                     
Dividends on preferred stock
   
-
   
-
   
.1
 
                     
Earnings applicable to common stock
 
$
136.3
 
$
75.1
 
$
105.2
 
                     
Average shares of common stock outstanding
                   
Basic
   
44.2
   
44.1
   
44.0
 
Diluted
   
44.4
   
44.3
   
44.2
 
                     
Earnings per average share of common stock
                   
Basic
                   
Before cumulative effect of accounting change
 
$
3.08
 
$
1.71
 
$
2.49
 
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
   
-
   
-
   
(.10
)
   
$
3.08
 
$
1.71
 
$
2.39
 
                     
Diluted
                   
Before cumulative effect of accounting change
 
$
3.07
 
$
1.70
 
$
2.48
 
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
   
-
   
-
   
(.10
)
   
$
3.07
 
$
1.70
 
$
2.38
 
                     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
                   
 
39
 

 
Nicor Inc.
                   
                     
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                   
(millions)
                   
Year ended December 31
 
     
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
Operating activities
                   
Net income
 
$
136.3
 
$
75.1
 
$
105.3
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow
                   
provided from operating activities:
                   
Depreciation 
   
172.4
   
166.6
   
161.7
 
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense 
   
(102.1
)
 
27.3
   
132.6
 
Cumulative effect of accounting change 
   
-
   
-
   
4.5
 
Loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment 
   
.3
   
(5.8
)
 
(1.9
)
Changes in assets and liabilities: 
                   
 Receivables, less allowances
   
(305.9
)
 
(121.5
)
 
(4.1
)
 Gas in storage
   
(40.6
)
 
13.3
   
(195.6
)
 Deferred/accrued gas costs
   
154.9
   
21.3
   
(20.3
)
 Prepaid pension costs
   
(6.1
)
 
(4.4
)
 
-
 
 Other assets
   
13.9
   
(.9
)
 
13.7
 
 Accounts payable
   
155.3
   
124.1
   
(166.0
)
 Other liabilities
   
21.8 
   
20.2
   
(30.2
)
Other items 
   
6.0
   
2.4
   
(12.3
)
Net cash flow provided from (used for) operating activities
   
206.2
   
317.7
   
(12.6
)
                     
Investing activities
                   
Capital expenditures
   
(201.9
)
 
(190.4
)
 
(181.3
)
Purchase of equity investments
   
(2.3
)
 
(2.6
)
 
(12.7
)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
   
-
   
(21.8
)
 
-
 
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities
   
(2.9
)
 
(2.9
)
 
(2.5
)
Proceeds from sales or maturities of available-for-sale securities
   
15.1
   
6.9
   
-
 
Proceeds from sales or maturities of held-to-maturity securities
   
3.6
   
2.8
   
1.9
 
Net (increase) decrease in other short-term investments
   
29.7
   
(4.7
)
 
(6.6
)
Repayments from joint ventures
   
-
   
-
   
8.3
 
Net proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
   
1.0
   
8.0
   
3.5
 
Other investing activities
   
3.0
   
-
   
3.4
 
Net cash flow used for investing activities
   
(154.7
)
 
(204.7
)
 
(186.0
)
                     
Financing activities
                   
Net proceeds from issuing long-term debt
   
39.9
   
-
   
147.8
 
Disbursements to retire long-term obligations
   
(1.2
)
 
-
   
(152.5
)
Commercial paper issuances with maturities over 90 days
   
-
   
35.0
   
730.0
 
Commercial paper repayments with maturities over 90 days
   
-
   
(575.0
)
 
(190.0
)
Net issuances (repayments) of commercial paper with maturities of
                   
90 days or less
   
96.0
   
455.0
   
(280.0
)
Dividends paid
   
(82.1
)
 
(82.0
)
 
(81.8
)
Borrowing against cash surrender value of life insurance policies
   
-
   
26.1
   
-
 
Repayment of loan against cash surrender value of life insurance policies
   
-
   
(11.7
)
 
-
 
Other financing activities
   
1.9
   
2.2
   
.2
 
Net cash flow provided from (used for) financing activities
   
54.5
   
(150.4
)
 
173.7
 
                     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
   
106.0
   
(37.4
)
 
(24.9
)
                     
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
   
12.9
   
50.3
   
75.2
 
                     
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
 
$
118.9
 
$
12.9
 
$
50.3
 
                     
Supplemental information
                   
Income taxes paid (refunded), net
 
$
99.6
 
$
10.4
 
$
(73.3
)
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized
   
39.1
   
37.9
   
41.1
 
                     
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
                   
                     
In 2004, one of Nicor's Directors and Officers insurance carriers paid $29.0 million into an escrow account as described in Note 4.  Assets and liabilities, including investment returns, were recorded as follows:
                   
 
                   
                     
Restricted short-term investments
       
$
29.1
       
Obligation related to restricted investments
         
29.1
       
                     
During the second quarter of 2005, the escrow arrangement was terminated and the full amount of the escrow of $29.0 million plus the earnings thereon of $0.4 million, was distributed to the company and recorded in income.
                   
 
                   
The release of the amount from escrow and the change in the obligation related to the restricted investment are netted in Investing activities above.
                   
 
                   
                     
                     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
                   
 
40
 

 
Nicor Inc.
             
               
Consolidated Balance Sheets
             
(millions)
             
December 31
 
   
 2005
 
 2004
 
Assets
           
               
Current assets
             
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
118.9
 
$
12.9
 
Restricted short-term investments
   
-
   
29.1
 
Short-term investments, at cost which approximates market
   
8.0
   
41.2
 
Receivables, less allowances of $31.5 and $21.9, respectively
   
889.1
   
583.2
 
Gas in storage
   
261.3
   
220.7
 
Deferred income taxes
   
3.0
   
72.3
 
Other
   
65.4
   
61.5
 
Total current assets
   
1,345.7
   
1,020.9
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, at cost
             
Gas distribution
   
4,043.2
   
3,831.6
 
Shipping
   
293.9
   
300.8
 
Other
   
14.2
   
11.2
 
     
4,351.3
   
4,143.6
 
Less accumulated depreciation
   
1,692.2
   
1,593.8
 
Total property, plant and equipment, net
   
2,659.1
   
2,549.8
 
               
Prepaid pension costs
   
187.6
   
181.5
 
Long-term investments
   
133.2
   
137.6
 
Other assets
   
65.6
   
85.4
 
               
Total assets
 
$
4,391.2
 
$
3,975.2
 
               
Liabilities and Capitalization
             
               
Current liabilities
             
Long-term obligations due within one year
 
$
50.0
 
$
.2
 
Short-term borrowings
   
586.0
   
490.0
 
Accounts payable
   
658.2
   
502.9
 
Accrued gas costs
   
223.2
   
68.3
 
Dividends payable
   
20.5
   
20.5
 
Deferred income taxes
   
7.4
   
-
 
Obligations related to restricted investments
   
-
   
29.1
 
Other
   
77.6
   
60.4
 
Total current liabilities
   
1,622.9
   
1,171.4
 
               
Deferred credits and other liabilities
             
Regulatory retirement cost liability
   
631.7
   
706.4
 
Deferred income taxes
   
421.6
   
593.4
 
Asset retirement obligation
   
164.0
   
-
 
Regulatory income tax liability
   
41.3
   
44.8
 
Unamortized investment tax credits
   
31.7
   
33.8
 
Other liabilities
   
180.3
   
179.4
 
Total deferred credits and other liabilities
   
1,470.6
   
1,557.8
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
             
               
Capitalization
             
Long-term obligations
             
Long-term bonds and notes, net of unamortized discount
   
485.8
   
495.3
 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
   
.6
   
1.6
 
Total long-term obligations
   
486.4
   
496.9
 
Common equity
   
811.3
   
749.1
 
               
Total capitalization
   
1,297.7
   
1,246.0
 
               
Total liabilities and capitalization
 
$
4,391.2
 
$
3,975.2
 
               
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
             
 
41
 

 
Nicor Inc.
                               
                                 
Consolidated Statements of Capitalization
                               
(millions, except share data)
                               
December 31
 
         
 2005
 
 2004
 
                                 
First mortgage bonds
                               
5.55% Series due 2006
       
$
50.0
       
$
50.0
       
5.875% Series due 2008
         
75.0
         
75.0
       
5.37% Series due 2009
         
50.0
         
50.0
       
6.625% Series due 2011
         
75.0
         
75.0
       
7.20% Series due 2016
         
50.0
         
50.0
       
5.80% Series due 2023
         
50.0
         
50.0
       
6.58% Series due 2028
         
50.0
         
50.0
       
5.90% Series due 2032
         
50.0
         
50.0
       
5.90% Series due 2033
         
50.0
         
50.0
       
         
500.0
         
500.0
       
                                 
Less:  Amount due within one year
   
 
   
50.0
         
-
       
 Unamortized debt discount, net of premium
         
4.2
         
4.7
       
           
445.8
   
34.4
%
 
495.3
   
39.8
%
                                 
                                 
Other long-term debt
                               
Senior unsecured term loan, variable interest rate of
                               
London Inter-bank Offered Rate plus .5%, due 2007 
         
40.0
   
3.1
   
-
   
-
 
Total long-term bonds and notes
         
485.8
   
37.5
   
495.3
   
39.8
 
                                 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred and preference stock
                               
Cumulative, $50 par value, 1,600,000 preferred
                               
shares authorized; and cumulative, without par 
                               
value, 20,000,000 preference shares authorized 
                               
(11,681 shares of redeemable preferred stock, 
                               
4.48% series, outstanding at December 31, 2005 
                               
and 35,444 shares of redeemable preferred stock, 
                               
4.48% and 5.00% series, outstanding at 
                               
December 31, 2004) 
         
.6
         
1.8
       
Less:  Amount due within one year
   
 
   
-
         
.2
       
Total mandatorily redeemable preferred and preference stock
         
.6
   
-
   
1.6
   
.1
 
                                 
                                 
Common equity
                               
Common stock, $2.50 par value, 160,000,000 shares
                               
authorized (2,447,380 and 2,568,646 shares reserved 
                               
for conversion and other purposes, and 44,179,972 
                               
and 44,102,118 shares outstanding, respectively) 
         
110.5
         
110.2
       
Paid-in capital
         
8.0
         
5.6
       
Retained earnings
         
694.5
         
640.3
       
Unearned compensation
         
(.1
)
       
(.2
)
     
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
                               
Cash flow hedges 
         
(1.6
)
       
(5.7
)
     
Minimum pension liability 
         
(.3
)
       
(1.5
)
     
Foreign currency translation adjustment 
         
.3
         
.4
       
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 
         
(1.6
)
       
(6.8
)
     
Total common equity
         
811.3
   
62.5
   
749.1
   
60.1
 
                                 
Total capitalization
       
$
1,297.7
   
100.0
%
$
1,246.0
   
100.0
%
                                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
 
 
42
 

 
Nicor Inc.
                   
                     
Consolidated Statements of Common Equity
                   
(millions, except per share data)
                   
Year ended December 31
 
     
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
Common stock
                   
Balance at beginning of year
 
$
110.2
 
$
110.1
 
$
110.0
 
Issued and converted stock
   
.3
   
.1
   
.1
 
Balance at end of year
   
110.5
   
110.2
   
110.1
 
                     
Paid-in capital
                   
Balance at beginning of year
   
5.6
   
3.6
   
1.2
 
Issued and converted stock
   
2.8
   
2.4
   
2.3
 
Reacquired and cancelled stock
   
(.4
)
 
(.4
)
 
.1
 
Balance at end of year
   
8.0
   
5.6
   
3.6
 
                     
Retained earnings
                   
Balance at beginning of year
   
640.3
   
647.1
   
623.8
 
Net income
   
136.3
   
75.1
   
105.3
 
Dividends on common stock ($1.86, $1.86 and $1.86
                   
per share, respectively) 
   
(82.1
)
 
(81.9
)
 
(81.9
)
Dividends on preferred stock
   
-
   
-
   
(.1
)
Balance at end of year
   
694.5
   
640.3
   
647.1
 
                     
Unearned compensation
                   
Balance at beginning of year
   
(.2
)
 
(.2
)
 
(.3
)
Restricted stock amortization
   
.1
   
-
   
.1
 
Balance at end of year
   
(.1
)
 
(.2
)
 
(.2
)
                     
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
                   
Balance at beginning of year
   
(6.8
)
 
(6.0
)
 
(6.3
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
   
5.2
   
(.8
)
 
.3
 
Balance at end of year
   
(1.6
)
 
(6.8
)
 
(6.0
)
                     
Total common equity
 
$
811.3
 
$
749.1
 
$
754.6
 
                     
                     
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
                   
(millions)
                   
Year ended December 31
 
     
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
                     
Net income
 
$
136.3
 
$
75.1
 
$
105.3
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax
                   
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
   
11.6
   
1.6
   
(17.4
)
Loss on available-for-sale securities
   
(.1
)
 
(.1
)
 
-
 
Reclassifications of hedge (gains) losses to net income
   
(4.9
)
 
(3.9
)
 
18.3
 
Decrease (increase) to minimum pension liability
   
2.2
   
-
   
(.1
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
(.1
)
 
.6
   
(.2
)
 
   
8.7
   
(1.8
)
 
.6
 
Related income tax benefit (expense)
   
(3.5
)
 
1.0
   
(.3
)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
   
5.2
   
(.8
)
 
.3
 
                     
Comprehensive income
 
$
141.5
 
$
74.3
 
$
105.6
 
                     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
                   
 
43
 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Nicor Inc. (“Nicor”) and all majority-owned subsidiaries. Nicor’s key subsidiaries are described in Note 13 - Business Segment and Geographic Information. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of estimates. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates that affect reported amounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could be material. Accounting estimates requiring significant management judgment involve accruals for legal, regulatory, environmental and tax loss contingencies, unbilled revenues, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, postretirement benefit assets and liabilities, asset retirement obligations, income tax assets and liabilities, the identification and valuation of derivative instruments, and potential asset impairments.

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the prior years’ financial statements to the current year’s presentation.

Cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are comprised of highly liquid investments of domestic subsidiaries with an initial maturity of three months or less. The carrying value of these investments approximates fair value because of their short maturity.

Regulatory assets and liabilities. Northern Illinois Gas Company (“Nicor Gas”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Nicor, is regulated by the Illinois Commerce Commission (“ICC”), which establishes the rules and regulations governing utility rates and services in Illinois. The company applies accounting standards that recognize the economic effects of rate regulation and, accordingly, has recorded regulatory assets and liabilities. The company had regulatory assets and liabilities at December 31 as follows (in millions):

     
2005
   
2004
 
Regulatory assets
             
Deferred environmental costs
 
$
15.1
 
$
35.4
 
Unamortized losses on reacquired debt
   
18.7
   
19.9
 
Deferred rate case costs
   
3.5
   
2.9
 
Other
   
.3
   
-
 
   
$
37.6
 
$
58.2
 
               
Regulatory liabilities
             
Regulatory retirement cost liability - current
 
$
9.0
 
$
11.6
 
Regulatory retirement cost liability - noncurrent
   
631.7
   
706.4
 
Accrued gas costs
   
223.2
   
68.3
 
Regulatory income tax liability
   
41.3
   
44.8
 
Other
   
1.8
   
.7
 
   
$
907.0
 
$
831.8
 

All regulatory assets noted above are classified in noncurrent other assets. The current portion of the regulatory retirement cost liability is classified in current other liabilities. Regulatory liabilities - Other are classified in noncurrent other liabilities.



44

Investments. The company classifies money market funds held by its non-U.S. subsidiaries as short-term investments. The company’s investments in marketable securities are classified at the date of acquisition into either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale categories. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. The company carries held-to-maturity securities at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in common equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities. These money market funds and marketable securities are included in either short-term or long-term investments based upon contractual maturity date.

Equity investments. The company invests in several partnerships and limited liability companies that are accounted for under the equity method. Related investment balances classified as long-term investments at December 31, 2005 and 2004 were $118.4 million and $112.3 million, respectively, and include $92.9 million and $87.1 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to Triton Container Investments L.L.C. (“Triton”), a cargo container leasing company.

Goodwill. Goodwill is the excess cost of an acquired business over the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Tropical Shipping had goodwill of $15.6 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and Nicor Services had goodwill of $3.5 million and $3.4 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Goodwill is classified in noncurrent other assets and is tested for impairment annually.

Asset retirement obligations. The company records legal obligations (as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations) associated with the retirement of long-lived assets in the period in which the obligation is incurred, if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate the fair value of the obligation. The obligation is recorded as both a cost of the long-lived asset and a corresponding liability. Subsequently, the asset retirement cost is depreciated over the life of the asset on a straight-line basis and the asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) is accreted to the expected settlement amount.

Subject to rate regulation, Nicor Gas continues to accrue all future asset retirement costs through depreciation over the lives of its assets even when a legal retirement obligation does not exist or insufficient information exists to determine the fair value of the obligation. Amounts charged to depreciation by Nicor Gas for future retirement costs in excess of the normal depreciation and accretion described above are classified as a regulatory retirement cost liability.

Derivative instruments. At Nicor Gas, derivative instruments, such as futures contracts, options and swap agreements, are utilized primarily in the procurement of natural gas for customers. These derivative instruments are reflected on the balance sheet at fair value. Realized gains or losses on such instruments are included in the cost of gas delivered and are passed directly through to customers, subject to ICC review, having no direct impact on earnings. Unrealized changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are deferred as regulatory assets or liabilities and classified on the balance sheet as deferred or accrued gas costs, respectively.

At times, Nicor Gas enters into futures contracts, options and fixed-price purchase agreements to reduce the earnings impact of certain forecasted operating costs arising from fluctuations in natural gas prices. These derivative instruments are carried at fair value, unless they qualify for the normal purchases and normal sales exception, in which case they are carried at cost. In 2003, for those instruments carried at fair value, cash flow hedge accounting was generally elected. Hedge accounting has not been elected since 2003, and accordingly, changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are now recorded in earnings as operating and maintenance expense.


45

Through early 2003, Nicor Gas held weather-related swap agreements to limit the earnings impact of weather fluctuations. The benefits or losses on these agreements were recorded in operating revenues.

Derivative instruments, such as futures contracts, options, forward contracts, swap agreements and other energy-related contracts are used by Nicor’s wholesale natural gas marketing business, Nicor Enerchange, to economically hedge price risk associated with energy trading activities involving inventories of natural gas and fixed-price purchase and sale agreements. Nicor Enerchange records its derivative instruments at fair value and generally cannot elect hedge accounting. As a result, changes in derivative fair values may have a material impact on Nicor’s financial statements.

Nicor Enerchange also enters into futures contracts, options and swap agreements to hedge price and weather risks related to Nicor Solutions’ utility-bill management products. These instruments are carried at fair value and cash flow hedge accounting is generally elected. To the extent cash flow hedge accounting is applied, the effective portion of any changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Ineffectiveness, if any, is immediately recognized in operating income. Such ineffectiveness was $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and was immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. The amount in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss is reclassified to earnings when the forecasted transaction occurs, even if the derivative instrument is sold, extinguished or terminated prior to the transaction occurring. If the forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, the amount in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss is immediately reclassified to earnings.

At December 31, 2005, the cash flow hedges component of accumulated other comprehensive loss was $1.6 million, reported net of $1.1 million of related income tax benefits. This loss includes $2.8 million of gains, net of $1.8 million of income taxes, on hedges related to Nicor Solutions’ utility-bill management products. The gains on hedges for the utility-bill management products are expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next 12 months.

At December 31, 2005, accumulated other comprehensive loss also included a loss of $4.2 million, reported net of $2.8 million of income tax benefits, related to losses on derivative instruments designated as hedges of interest payments on 30-year bonds issued by Nicor Gas in December 2003. Nicor periodically utilizes derivative instruments to reduce interest rate risk associated with the anticipated issuance of debt. Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Upon the issuance of the debt, the amount deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt instrument. The losses on hedges of interest payments are being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the bonds.

Fair values are determined from quoted market prices and other external sources, where available, or are estimated using internal models. Estimates from internal models were not material to Nicor’s financial statements. Cash flow hedge accounting may be elected only for highly effective hedges, based upon an assessment, performed at least quarterly, of the historical and probable future correlation of changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument to changes in the expected future cash flows of the hedged item.

Derivative instruments are classified as current or noncurrent other assets or liabilities as appropriate. Cash flows from derivative instruments are recognized in the consolidated statements of cash flows and gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations in the same categories as the underlying transactions.

Credit risk. Nicor’s major subsidiaries have diversified customer bases and prudent credit policies which mitigate customer receivable and derivative counterparty credit risk. The company is exposed to credit risk in the event a counterparty, customer or supplier defaults on a contract to pay for or deliver product at agreed-upon terms and conditions. To manage this risk, the company has established

46

procedures to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties, to require guarantees or collateral back-up, and to limit its exposure to any one counterparty. Nicor also, in some instances, enters into netting arrangements to mitigate counterparty credit risk. Credit losses are accrued as liabilities when probable and reasonably estimable.

Operating revenues and gas costs. Gas distribution revenues are recognized when natural gas is delivered to customers. In accordance with ICC regulations, the cost of gas delivered is charged to customers without markup, although the timing of cost recovery can vary, and is subject to ICC review. Temporary undercollections and overcollections of gas costs are deferred or accrued as a regulatory asset or liability with a corresponding decrease or increase to cost of gas, respectively. Nicor Gas accrues revenues and related gas costs for estimated deliveries to customers from the date of their last bill until the balance sheet date.

In the shipping segment, revenues and related delivery costs are recognized at the time vessels depart from port. While alternative methods of recognizing shipping revenue and related costs exist, the difference between those methods and the company’s policy does not have a material impact on financial results.

For Nicor Solutions, revenue is recognized on its 12-month utility-bill management contracts as the lesser of cumulative earned or cumulative billed amounts. Nicor Services recognizes revenue for warranty and repair contracts on a straight-line basis over the contract term. Revenue for maintenance services is recognized at the time such services are performed. Nicor Enerchange presents revenue for natural gas sales, cost of sales, and related hedging activities on a net basis as required for an energy trading business.

At December 31, 2005 and 2004, trade receivables include accrued unbilled revenues of $300.9 million and $205.0 million, respectively, related almost entirely to gas distribution operations.

Repair and maintenance expense. Nicor records expense for repair and maintenance costs as incurred, with one exception - Tropical Shipping uses the accrue-in-advance method for planned major maintenance related to dry-docking and major repairs of its owned vessels. These costs are typically accrued over a period of about three years.

Legal defense costs. The company accrues estimated legal defense costs associated with loss contingencies in the period in which it determines that such costs are probable of being incurred and are reasonably estimable.

Depreciation. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. The gas distribution composite depreciation rate is 4.1 percent, which includes all estimated future retirement costs. The estimated useful lives of shipping-segment vessels range from 20 to 25 years.

Revenue taxes. Nicor Gas classifies revenue taxes billed to customers as operating revenues and related taxes incurred as operating expenses. Revenue taxes included in operating expense for 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $152.0 million, $139.4 million and $130.9 million, respectively.

Income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided at the current statutory income tax rate for temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements. In the gas distribution segment, investment tax credits and regulatory income tax liabilities for deferred taxes in excess of the current statutory rate are amortized to income over the lives of related properties.

After accounting for the repatriation, Nicor has remaining at December 31, 2005 approximately $12 million deferred income tax liabilities related to approximately $34 million of cumulative undistributed

47

earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. Nicor has not recorded deferred income taxes of approximately $18 million on approximately $51 million of cumulative undistributed foreign earnings that are expected in management’s judgment to be indefinitely reinvested offshore.  See Note 8 - Income and Other Taxes for information on the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”).

Cumulative effect of change in accounting. Effective January 1, 2003, Nicor’s wholesale natural gas marketing business, Nicor Enerchange, began applying accrual accounting rather than fair value accounting to gas in storage and certain energy-related contracts, such as storage and transportation agreements. The change in accounting method relates to a rescission of Emerging Issues Task Force Consensus No. 98-10, Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities, and a prohibition against recording inventory at fair value. Effective with the change, Nicor recorded a $4.5 million cumulative effect loss from the change in accounting principle, which was net of $3.0 million in income tax benefits.

2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Accounting changes and error corrections. In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.  The statement requires retrospective application of voluntary changes in accounting principle and error corrections. Retrospective application is also required for mandatory changes in accounting principle if the transition method is not prescribed. The statement is effective for the company beginning January 1, 2006 and will be adopted prospectively. The initial adoption of this standard is not expected to have any impact on the company’s cash flows, financial position or results of operations.

Asset retirement obligations. In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 is an interpretation of SFAS No. 143 that generally results in a broadened assessment of when assets contain measurable retirement obligations. Prior to adopting FIN 47, Nicor recorded AROs related primarily to the required removal and/or disposal of mercury regulators.

Nicor adopted FIN 47 in 2005. Upon adoption, Nicor:  recorded additional AROs associated with services, mains and other components of the distribution system and the buildings in its gas distribution segment and with certain equipment in its shipping segment of $160.6 million; increased the carrying value of the related assets by $60.1 million; increased accumulated depreciation by $26.4 million; and reduced its regulatory liability for future retirement costs by $126.6 million. Nicor Gas has not recognized an ARO associated with gathering lines and storage wells because there is insufficient company or industry retirement history to reasonably estimate the fair value of the obligation. In connection with the adoption, $0.2 million was charged to net income. At December 31, 2005 a total ARO of $164.8 million is recorded, substantially all of which is classified as a noncurrent liability.

As provided for by FIN 47, the financial statements for the periods prior to December 31, 2005 have not been restated. If the company had applied the interpretations of FIN 47 to prior periods, it would have recorded AROs of $152.9 million, $147.0 million and $140.9 million at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Share-based payment. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires entities to adopt the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation plans. The fair value method will require the amortization of the fair value of equity awards, as determined at the date of grant, over the related vesting period. SFAS 123R also requires certain share-based liabilities, such as stock appreciation rights, to be recorded at fair value, and

48

most employee stock purchase plans that offer a discount of greater than five percent will be considered compensatory, which will require the entire discount to be charged to expense. Nicor’s primary stock-based compensation plans are described in Note 10 - Stock-Based Compensation.

The provisions of SFAS 123R are effective for Nicor beginning January 1, 2006 and will be adopted on a modified prospective basis for equity awards. In addition, share-based liabilities will be adjusted from intrinsic value to fair value on January 1, 2006, with a corresponding adjustment to pretax earnings. The company has substantially completed its evaluation of SFAS 123R and the implementation of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s cash flow, financial position or results of operations.

At December 31, 2005, Nicor continues to apply the intrinsic value method of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, for all awards granted under its stock-based compensation plans. The intrinsic value method does not require compensation expense to be recognized for Nicor’s equity awards. If compensation expense for stock options and other equity awards had been recognized based upon the fair value method, the impact on the company’s net income and earnings per share would have been as follows (in millions, except per share data):

     
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
Net income
                   
As reported
 
$
136.3
 
$
75.1
 
$
105.3
 
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of tax
   
1.2
   
1.2
   
.7
 
Pro forma
 
$
135.1
 
$
73.9
 
$
104.6
 
                     
                     
Earnings per share
                   
Basic - As reported
 
$
3.08
 
$
1.71
 
$
2.39
 
Basic - Pro forma
   
3.05
   
1.68
   
2.38
 
Diluted - As reported
   
3.07
   
1.70
   
2.38
 
Diluted - Pro forma
   
3.05
   
1.67
   
2.37
 

3. INVESTMENTS

The following is a summary of the carrying values, which approximate fair value, of marketable securities at December 31 (in millions):

     
2005
   
2004
 
Available-for-sale
             
U.S. government agency securities
 
$
-
 
$
7.7
 
U.S. Treasury securities
   
-
   
1.7
 
Corporate bonds
   
-
   
4.8
 
Other
   
.6
   
.9
 
     
.6
   
15.1
 
Held-to-maturity
             
Corporate bonds
   
6.9
   
7.3
 
Certificates of deposit
   
.3
   
.3
 
     
7.2
   
7.6
 
   
$
7.8
 
$
22.7
 



49

At December 31, 2005 and 2004, short-term investments totaled $8.0 million and $41.2 million, respectively. These investments include $5.7 million and $35.6 million of money market funds held by the company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries and $2.3 million and $5.6 million of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The remaining marketable securities are included in long-term investments.

Securities of $1.3 million were sold during 2004 that had originally been classified as held-to-maturity. These sales occurred after the issuer’s creditworthiness declined thus becoming non-compliant with the company’s investment policy. There was no gain or loss realized on the 2004 sale of these securities.

Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were $15.1 million, $6.9 million and zero in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. There were no significant realized gains or losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities in 2005, 2004 or 2003.

The contractual maturities of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity marketable securities at December 31, 2005 were as follows (in millions):

Years to maturity
   
Less
than 1
year 
   
1-5
years
   
5-10
years
   
More
than 10
years
   
Total
 
                                 
Available-for-sale
 
$
.6
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
.6
 
Held-to-maturity
   
1.7
   
5.5
   
-
   
-
   
7.2
 
   
$
2.3
 
$
5.5
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
7.8
 

4. RESTRICTED SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

At December 31, 2004, Nicor had $29.1 million of restricted short-term investments held in an escrow fund and a corresponding $29.1 million current liability. The escrow fund was established through a $29.0 million deposit by one of Nicor’s Directors and Officers insurance carriers to be used to satisfy Nicor’s directors’ and officers’ liabilities and expenses associated with claims asserted against them, with any remaining balance to be paid to Nicor. On May 17, 2005, the restriction on this fund ceased, and the funds were released to the company. As of December 31, 2005, no restricted short-term investments remained. (See also Note 19 - Contingencies.)

5. GAS IN STORAGE

Gas in storage at December 31 included natural gas inventory of the following subsidiaries (in millions):

     
2005
   
2004
 
               
Nicor Gas
 
$
221.0
 
$
189.0
 
Nicor Enerchange
   
40.3
   
31.7
 
   
$
261.3
 
$
220.7
 

Gas distribution segment inventory is carried at cost on a last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) basis. Nicor Enerchange inventory is carried at the lower of weighted-average cost or market.

Based on the average cost of gas purchased in December 2005 and 2004, the estimated replacement cost of Nicor Gas’ inventory at December 31, 2005 and 2004 exceeded the LIFO cost by $778.4 million and $434.2 million, respectively.

50

During 2004, Nicor Gas partially liquidated a LIFO layer at a cost per thousand cubic feet (“Mcf”) of $5.81. For gas purchased in 2004, the company’s average cost per Mcf was $0.24 higher than the LIFO liquidation rate. Applying LIFO cost in valuing the liquidations, as opposed to using the average gas purchase cost, had the effect of decreasing the cost of gas in 2004 by $0.7 million. However, since the cost of gas, including inventory costs, is charged to customers without markup, these amounts had no impact on net income. There was no liquidation of any LIFO layers during 2005 and 2003.

6. SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM DEBT

In December 2005, Tropical Shipping obtained a $40 million two-year senior unsecured term loan used to fund a portion of the repatriation of its cumulative undistributed foreign earnings in connection with the Jobs Act. The term loan bears a floating interest rate based on the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.50 percent per annum.

In September 2005, Nicor and Nicor Gas established two revolving credit facilities totaling $1 billion with major domestic and foreign banks, which replaced the $500 million, three-year revolver, which was to expire in September 2007 and the $400 million, 210-day seasonal revolver, which expired in April 2005. In connection with this replacement, the company charged to interest expense $0.8 million of unamortized costs on the $500 million revolver.

The new replacement facilities, which serve as backup for the issuance of commercial paper, consist of a $600 million, 5-year revolver, expiring September 2010, available to Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas, and a $400 million, 210-day seasonal revolver, expiring in April 2006, available to Nicor Gas. Commitment fees paid in advance are insignificant and are being amortized over the respective terms of the agreements as interest expense. The company believes it is in compliance with all debt covenants at December 31, 2005.

The company had $586 million and $490 million of commercial paper outstanding with a weighted-average interest rate of 4.1 percent and 2.3 percent at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The company incurred total interest expense of $47.9 million, $41.6 million, and $37.6 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Interest expense is reported net of amounts capitalized. Interest expense capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $1.1 million, $0.4 million, and $0.3 million, respectively.

7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The recorded amount of short-term investments, restricted short-term investments and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments. Long-term debt outstanding, including current maturities, is recorded at the principal balance outstanding, net of unamortized discount and issuance costs. The principal balance of Nicor Gas’ First Mortgage Bonds outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $500 million. Based on quoted market interest rates, the fair value of the company’s First Mortgage Bonds outstanding, including current maturities, was approximately $525 million and $530 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value as determined primarily from actively quoted prices. The fair value of derivative financial instruments held at December 31, 2005 relates primarily to Nicor Gas. The majority of derivative financial instruments held by Nicor Gas are for the purpose of hedging natural gas purchases, and their settlement is passed directly through to customers without markup, subject to ICC review. The gross asset and liability fair values of these instruments are reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 as follows (in millions):



51

 
 
 
   
2005
   
2004
             
Current other assets
 
$
29.2
 
$
5.1
Noncurrent other assets
   
2.3
   
.7
   
$
31.5
 
$
5.8
             
Current other liabilities
 
$
6.1
 
$
1.8
Noncurrent other liabilities
   
1.4
   
.5
   
$
7.5
 
$
2.3

Nicor maintains margin accounts related to financial derivative transactions. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the balance of these accounts were $37.0 million and $24.5 million, respectively, and were reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Receivables.

8. INCOME AND OTHER TAXES

The components of income tax expense (benefit) are presented below (in millions):

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
Current
                     
Federal
$
116.3
   
$
9.3
   
$
(55.0
)
State
 
22.1
     
(5.0
)
   
(16.4
)
   
138.4
     
4.3
     
(71.4
)
Deferred
                     
Federal
 
(87.7
)
   
17.0
     
99.8
 
State
 
(14.4
)
   
10.3
     
32.8
 
   
(102.1
)
   
27.3
     
132.6
 
                       
Amortization of investment tax credits, net
 
(2.1
)
   
(1.8
)
   
(2.0
)
Foreign taxes
 
.5
     
.4
     
.4
 
Income tax expense, net
$
34.7
   
$
30.2
   
$
59.6
 

The temporary differences which gave rise to the net deferred tax liability at December 31 were as follows (in millions):

 
2005
   
2004
 
Deferred tax liabilities
             
Property, plant and equipment
$
354.7
   
$
432.2
 
Investment in partnerships
 
134.3
     
138.0
 
Investment in foreign subsidiaries
 
12.0
     
47.1
 
Other
 
31.2
     
37.4
 
   
532.2
     
654.7
 
Deferred tax assets
             
Alternative minimum tax
 
32.0
     
41.8
 
Other
 
74.2
     
91.8
 
   
106.2
     
133.6
 
Net deferred tax liability
$
426.0
   
$
521.1
 






52

Differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective combined federal and state income tax rate are shown below:

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
Federal statutory rate
 
35.0
%
   
35.0
%
   
35.0
%
Foreign earnings repatriation
 
(9.9
)
   
-
     
-
 
State income taxes, net
 
3.1
     
3.7
     
3.9
 
Tax credits
 
(3.1
)
   
(5.3
)
   
(2.7
)
Amortization of regulatory tax liability
 
(1.1
)
   
(1.8
)
   
(1.2
)
Undistributed foreign earnings
 
(3.3
)
   
(3.0
)
   
(1.5
)
Other, net
 
(.4
)
   
.1
     
1.7
 
Effective combined federal and state income tax rate
 
20.3
%
   
28.7
%
   
35.2
%

The overall effective income tax rate for 2005 decreased to 20.3 percent from the prior year rate of 28.7 percent, due primarily to the 2005 tax benefits recorded in connection with the Jobs Act (approximately $17 million). The decline in the company’s effective income tax rate to 28.7 percent in 2004 from 35.2 percent in 2003 was primarily a result of lower pretax income (which typically causes a lower effective income tax rate since permanent differences and tax credits are a larger share of pretax income).
The company had available at December 31, 2005, federal alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards of approximately $38.2 million, which may be used indefinitely to reduce federal income taxes. The company believes it is more likely than not that all of its AMT benefits will be realized and accordingly, no valuation allowance has been recorded.

The company accrues tax and interest related to tax uncertainties. Tax uncertainties arise due to actual or potential disagreements about the tax treatment of specific items between the company and the governmental agency reviewing the company’s tax returns. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the company had accrued approximately $17.1 million and $6.3 million, respectively, for such uncertainties.

In 2003, Nicor received an income tax refund of approximately $100 million attributable to a tax loss carryback associated with a change in tax accounting method, (which increased its deferred income tax liability), subject to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) review and approval as part of normal ongoing audits. Through December 31, 2004, the total current tax benefits previously recorded under this accounting method approximated $135 million (amounts recorded were offset by increases to the deferred tax liability with no net effect on reported net federal income tax expense). In 2005, the IRS revised the regulations pertaining to the aforementioned tax accounting method. The new regulations require repayment in 2005 and 2006 of amounts previously taken as current tax deductions. As a result of this revision, the company reclassified from deferred to current income tax expense approximately $67 million, reflecting the amount repaid during 2005. The company expects to repay the remaining amounts during 2006. The anticipated repayment is expected to have no direct impact on earnings and no material impact on the company’s financial condition.

On October 22, 2004, the Jobs Act was enacted. Certain provisions of the Jobs Act impact income taxes related to the earnings of foreign subsidiaries of Nicor. One provision provides that a portion of a foreign subsidiary’s income is no longer subject to current federal taxation because of its status as shipping income, beginning in 2005, to the extent such earnings are retained by the foreign subsidiary. Another provision of the Jobs Act allowed a portion of cumulative undistributed earnings of a foreign subsidiary to be repatriated to the United States by the end of 2005, at an effective federal income tax rate of 5.25 percent.

As of December 31, 2004, Nicor had recorded a $47 million deferred income tax liability, based on a 35 percent federal income tax rate, associated with approximately $134 million of earnings retained by its foreign subsidiaries. Nicor had not provided deferred income taxes of approximately $12 million on

53

approximately $35 million of cumulative undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that were considered to be indefinitely invested in foreign operations.

During December 2005, Nicor repatriated $132 million of cumulative undistributed earnings. The repatriation was funded by cash available from foreign subsidiaries coupled with the proceeds received by Tropical Shipping in connection with the December 2005 issuance of a $40 million two-year senior unsecured term loan. The federal income tax benefit resulting from the repatriation is approximately $17 million and was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2005. In conjunction with the repatriation, Nicor reclassified approximately $7.6 million of deferred income tax liabilities to other income tax reserves.

After accounting for the repatriation, Nicor has remaining at December 31, 2005 approximately $12 million deferred income tax liabilities related to approximately $34 million of cumulative undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. Nicor has not recorded deferred income taxes of approximately $18 million on approximately $51 million of cumulative undistributed foreign earnings that are expected in management’s judgment to be indefinitely reinvested offshore.

As a result of the repatriation, Nicor has approximately $83 million of cash it expects to use for qualifying investment uses under the Jobs Act. Qualifying investment uses include funding of United States-based employee-related costs, capital investments, and advertising and marketing expenditures.

9. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

Nicor Gas maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees hired prior to 1998. Pension benefits are based on years of service and highest average salary for management employees and job level for unionized employees. The benefit obligation related to collectively bargained benefits considers the company’s past practice of regular benefit increases to reflect current wages. Nicor Gas also provides health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retired employees under a plan that includes a limit on the company’s share of cost for employees hired after 1982. The company’s postretirement benefit costs have historically been considered in rate proceedings in the period they are accrued.

The following table sets forth the changes in the plans’ benefit obligations and assets, and reconciles the October 1 funded status of the plans to the prepaid (accrued) benefit cost recorded on the balance sheet at December 31 (in millions):

 
 
Pension benefits
 
Health care and
other benefits
 
2005
 
2004
 
2005
 
2004
               
Change in benefit obligation
             
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
$
282.6
   
$
273.1
   
$
184.7
   
$
173.6
 
Service cost
 
9.3
     
9.0
     
2.7
     
2.4
 
Interest cost
 
15.6
     
15.7
     
10.3
     
10.1
 
Actuarial loss
 
7.1
     
10.6
     
4.9
     
8.2
 
Participant contributions
 
-
     
-
     
.8
     
.9
 
Plan amendments
 
-
     
-
     
-
     
(1.9
)
Benefits paid
 
(30.2
)
   
(25.8
)
   
(10.9
)
   
(8.6
)
Benefit obligation at end of period
 
284.4
     
282.6
     
192.5
     
184.7
 





54

 
 
Pension benefits
 
Health care and
other benefits
 
2005
 
2004
 
2005
 
2004
               
Change in plan assets
             
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
 
402.0
     
383.6
     
10.6
     
11.7
 
Actual return on plan assets
 
52.2
     
44.2
     
1.0
     
1.2
 
Employer contributions
 
-
     
-
     
5.4
     
5.4
 
Participant contributions
 
-
     
-
     
.8
     
.9
 
Benefits paid
 
(30.2
)
   
(25.8
)
   
(10.9
)
   
(8.6
)
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
 
424.0
     
402.0
     
6.9
     
10.6
 

Funded status
 
139.6
     
119.4
     
(185.6
)
   
(174.1
)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
 
44.9
     
58.4
     
88.5
     
88.6
 
Unrecognized prior service cost
 
3.1
     
3.7
     
(.7
)
   
(.8
)
Other
 
-
     
-
     
(3.8
)
   
(2.7
)
Recognized prepaid (accrued) benefit cost
$
187.6
   
$
181.5
   
$
(101.6
)
 
$
(89.0
)

The accumulated benefit obligation for pension benefits, a measure which excludes the effect of salary and wage increases, was $246.1 million and $238.8 million at October 1, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The accrued benefit cost for health care and life insurance benefits is classified as a noncurrent other liability.

In 2003, the company amended the retiree health care plan as it applies to non-unionized employees to improve consistency of benefits among participant groups and reduce the company’s share of plan costs effective January 1, 2004. In 2004, further cost-sharing amendments, effective January 1, 2006, were made to the plan for all employees.

About one-fourth of the net periodic benefit cost or credit related to these plans has been capitalized as a cost of constructing gas distribution facilities and the remainder is included in gas distribution operating and maintenance expense. Net periodic benefit cost (credit) included the following components (in millions):

 
Pension benefits
 
Health care and
other benefits
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                                               
Service cost
$
9.3
   
$
9.0
   
$
7.4
   
$
2.7
   
$
2.4
   
$
2.0
 
Interest cost
 
15.6
     
15.7
     
16.3
     
10.3
     
10.1
     
11.1
 
Expected return on plan assets
 
(33.2
)
   
(31.7
)
   
(28.7
)
   
(.9
)
   
(1.0
)
   
(1.2
)
Recognized net actuarial loss
 
1.6
     
2.0
     
4.3
     
4.9
     
4.6
     
2.9
 
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation
 
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
.1
     
3.1
 
Amortization of prior service cost
 
.6
     
.6
     
.7
     
(.1
)
   
-
     
-
 
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)
$
(6.1
)
 
$
(4.4
)
 
$
-
   
$
16.9
   
$
16.2
   
$
17.9
 








55

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at October 1 included the following:

 
 
Pension benefits
 
Health care and
other benefits
 
2005
 
2004
 
2005
 
2004
                               
Discount rate
 
5.50
%
   
5.75
%
   
5.50
%
   
5.75
%
Rate of compensation increase
 
3.75
     
4.00
     
3.75
     
4.00
 

The 5.50 percent discount rate was determined independently for the pension and health-care plans based on bond matching models, using non-callable, high quality bonds (AA- or better), whose cash flows match the timing and amount of future benefit payments of the plans.

Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31 included the following:

 
Pension benefits
 
Health care and other benefits
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                                               
Discount rate
 
5.75
%
   
6.00
%
   
6.75
%
   
5.75
%
   
6.00
%
   
6.75
%
Expected return on assets
 
8.50
     
8.50
     
8.75
     
8.50
     
8.50
     
8.75
 
Rate of compensation increase
 
4.00
     
4.00
     
4.00
     
4.00
     
4.00
     
4.00
 

Nicor Gas establishes its expected long-term return-on-asset assumption by considering historical and projected returns for each investment asset category. Projected returns are calculated with the assistance of independent firms via probability-based models. The company has elected to apply this assumption to the fair value of plan assets, rather than to a rolling-average fair value, in calculating the expected return on plan assets component of net periodic benefit cost. The assumed rate of return on assets can have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the pension benefits. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed rate of return on assets would impact the net periodic pension credit by approximately $4 million.

Other assumptions used to determine the health care benefit obligation at October 1 were as follows:

 
2005
 
2004
Health care cost trend rate
 
9.5
%
   
9.5
%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate rate)
 
5.0
%
   
5.0
%
Years to reach ultimate rate
 
5
     
4
 

Other assumptions used to determine the health care benefit cost for the years ended December 31 were as follows:

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
Health care cost trend rate
 
9.5
%
   
9.5
%
   
11.0
%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate rate)
 
5.0
%
   
5.0
%
   
5.0
%
Years to reach ultimate rate
 
4
     
4
     
4
 

Assumed health care cost trend rates can have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects (in millions):





56

 
One-percent
 
Increase
 
Decrease
               
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
$
1.3
   
$
(1.1
)
Effect on benefit obligation
 
18.1
     
(15.4
)

In 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“FSP SFAS 106-2”). The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) provides a prescription drug benefit as well as a potential federal subsidy to sponsors of certain retiree health care benefit plans. FSP SFAS 106-2 provides guidance on accounting for the effects of the Act, including the potential subsidy, and required public companies to reflect the impact by the third quarter of 2004, if determinable and significant. The company’s 2004 net periodic postretirement health care costs do not reflect the effects of the Act because the company’s actuaries estimated that the impact in 2004 would be minimal. The company has, as required, reflected its best estimate of the potential subsidy in the October 1, 2004 measurement of the benefit obligation. The potential subsidy reduced the October 1, 2004 benefit obligation by $19.4 million, creating an actuarial gain that will be amortized over the remaining service lives of plan participants. Beginning in 2005, the company has also reflected its best estimate of the potential subsidy in its measurement of net periodic postretirement health care costs. The estimated subsidy reduced such costs by $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This reduction was offset by general medical cost increases. As of the October 1, 2005 measurement date, the company refined its estimate of the potential subsidy to be ultimately collected. The refinement reduced the benefit obligation by an additional $19.7 million, creating an actuarial gain which will also be amortized over the remaining service lives of plan participants beginning in 2006, and further reducing the projected 2006 periodic health care plan cost by $2.9 million.

The company’s investment objective relating to pension plan assets is to have a high probability of meeting its obligations without additional cash contributions. The company’s investment strategy is to maintain an asset mix near its target asset allocation and to rebalance the portfolio monthly if the actual allocation deviates from the target by two or more percentage points. The following table sets forth the target allocation and actual percentage of plan assets by asset category:

   
Target
 
Percentage of plan assets
at October 1
Asset category
 
allocation
   
2005
   
2004
 
 
Equity securities
 
 
69
 
%
 
 
69
 
%
 
 
69
 
%
Debt securities
 
31
   
31
   
30
 
Real estate and other
 
-
   
-
   
1
 
   
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%

The company does not expect to contribute to its pension plan in 2006 and expects to contribute about $11.9 million to its other postretirement benefit plan in 2006. The following table sets forth the benefit payments from the plans expected over the next 10 years (in millions):









57

 
 
Twelve months ending October 1
   
 
Pension benefits
   
Health care and other benefits
   
Expected Medicare subsidy
 
                     
2006
 
$
27.4
 
$
11.9
 
$
(1.5
)
2007
   
18.4
   
12.6
   
(1.6
)
2008
   
17.5
   
13.1
   
(1.8
)
2009
   
18.8
   
13.7
   
(1.9
)
2010
   
20.0
   
14.2
   
(2.0
)
2011-2015
   
129.7
   
76.9
   
(10.7
)

Higher projected pension benefit payments for the 2006 plan year reflect an expected increase in retirements due to the health care cost-sharing amendments which become effective January 1, 2006.

Nicor also has a separate unfunded supplemental retirement plan and provides unfunded postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to employees of discontinued businesses. These plans are noncontributory with defined benefits. Plan expenses were $2.5 million, $1.9 million and $1.4 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The projected benefit obligation associated with these plans was $7.1 million and $12.7 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The company also sponsors defined contribution plans covering substantially all domestic employees. These plans provide for employer matching contributions. The total cost of these plans was $6.5 million, $6.2 million and $6.0 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Nicor has a long-term incentive compensation plan that permits the granting of stock options, restricted stock and alternate stock rights to key executives and managerial employees, as well as a stock deferral plan and an employee stock purchase plan.

Long-term incentive compensation plan. The company may grant options for up to 3.5 million common shares and at December 31, 2005 had 0.4 million options available to be granted. The stock option exercise price equals the stock’s market price on the date of grant. Options vest after one year, generally become exercisable after three years, and expire after ten years.

Following is a summary of stock option activity:
 
 
Number of shares
   
Weighted-average exercise price
Options outstanding at:
             
December 31, 2002
 
882,600
   
$
36.90
 
Granted
 
349,600
     
27.17
 
Exercised
 
-
     
-
 
Cancelled
 
(74,900
)
   
36.95
 
December 31, 2003
 
1,157,300
     
33.96
 
Granted
 
333,600
     
36.35
 
Exercised
 
(19,400
)
   
31.37
 
Cancelled
 
(182,900
)
   
34.31
 
December 31, 2004
 
1,288,600
     
34.57
 
Granted
 
261,000
     
37.23
 
Exercised
 
(82,548
)
   
28.18
 
Cancelled
 
(22,600
)
   
34.64
 
December 31, 2005
 
1,444,452
     
35.41
 

58

 
Number of shares
   
Weighted-average exercise price
               
Options exercisable at:
             
December 31, 2003
 
513,000
   
$
34.47
 
December 31, 2004
 
549,800
     
35.23
 
December 31, 2005
 
634,400
     
37.61
 

Exercise price ranges for stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005 are as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
Range of exercise price
 
Number of shares
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted -average exercise price
 
 
 
Weighted -average
remaining contractual life
 
 
 
 
Number of shares currently exercisable
 
 
 
Weighted -average exercise price of options currently exercisable
                     
$26.97 - $34.10
 
461,652
 
$ 29.30
 
6.4
 
200,200
 
$ 32.00
36.34 - 45.05
 
982,800
 
38.28
 
7.6
 
434,200
 
40.20

The weighted-average fair value of options granted in 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $7.22, $6.98 and $4.32, respectively. The fair value of each option was estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
Expected volatility
 
32.6%
     
35.5%
     
34.7%
 
Dividend yield
 
5.0%
     
5.1%
     
6.9%
 
Risk-free interest rate
 
4.0%
     
2.4%
     
2.7%
 
Expected period outstanding (years)
 
4
     
4
     
4
 

The computation of Nicor’s diluted earnings per share includes the potentially dilutive effect of issuing additional shares due to employees exercising stock options. However, when option exercise prices are above the stock prices, those options are not considered in the earnings per share computation, as to do so would be anti-dilutive. As a result, Nicor’s earnings per share computation excludes the potentially dilutive effect related to about 201,000 options, 306,500 options and 508,800 options in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Stock deferral plan. Officers may elect to defer up to 50 percent of their annual bonus or long-term incentive award in exchange for Nicor common stock to be received at a future date. No additional compensation expense is recorded since the number of shares to be provided is determined based upon market value on the deferral date. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, Nicor had commitments to distribute about 115,200 common shares and 94,900 common shares, respectively, to participants of the plan.

Employee stock purchase plan. Under the employee stock purchase plan, the company may sell up to 1.5 million shares of common stock to its employees and has sold about 1.1 million shares through December 31, 2005. Under the terms of this plan, eligible employees may purchase shares at 90 percent of the stock’s market price. The company sold about 24,900 shares, 28,700 shares and 30,900 shares to employees in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The weighted-average market value of shares sold in 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $38.50, $34.65 and $32.30, respectively.




59

11. COMMON STOCK

Changes in common shares. Changes in common shares outstanding are below (in millions):

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
Beginning of year
 
44.1
   
 
44.0
     
44.0
 
Issued
 
.1
     
.1
     
-
 
End of year
 
44.2
     
44.1
     
44.0
 

There were no repurchases of common stock in 2005, 2004 and 2003 under the common stock repurchase program announced in 2001.

Dividend and other restrictions. Nicor has no contractual or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends. Nicor Gas is restricted by regulation in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates. Dividends are allowed only to the extent of Nicor Gas’ retained earnings balance. In addition, Nicor Gas may not extend cash advances to an affiliate if Nicor Gas has any outstanding short-term borrowings. Nicor Gas’ practice also provides that the balance of cash deposits or advances from Nicor Gas to an affiliate at any time shall not exceed the unused balance of funds actually available to that affiliate under its existing bank credit agreements or its commercial paper facilities with unaffiliated third parties. Nicor Gas’ positive cash deposits, if any, may be applied by Nicor to offset negative balances of other Nicor subsidiaries and vice versa.

12. MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK

Voting. Each share of preferred stock, regardless of class, entitles the holder to one vote as to matters considered at the company’s annual meeting of shareholders.

Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock. On November 3, 2005 Nicor redeemed 20,062 shares of 5% Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock, $50 par value, at a per share redemption price of $51 plus accrued and unpaid dividends. There were 11,681 shares of the 4.48% Series Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock, $50 par value, outstanding at December 31, 2005.

13. BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Nicor is a holding company that operates primarily in two separately managed reportable business segments: gas distribution and shipping. The gas distribution segment, Nicor’s principal business, serves over 2.1 million customers in a service territory that encompasses most of the northern third of Illinois, excluding the city of Chicago. The shipping segment transports containerized freight between Florida, the eastern coast of Canada, the Bahamas and the Caribbean region. The shipping segment also includes amounts related to cargo insurance coverages sold to its customers and other third parties.

Gas distribution revenues are comprised principally of natural gas sales bundled with delivery, delivery-only (transportation) services and revenue taxes, as follows (in millions):

   
2005
 
2004
 
2003
             
 
Bundled sales
$ 2,546.7
 
$ 2,024.7
 
$ 2,014.8
 
Transportation
151.9
 
147.4
 
148.0
 
Revenue taxes
156.4
 
143.5
 
134.0
 
Other
54.6
 
46.5
 
54.8
   
$ 2,909.6
 
$ 2,362.1
 
$ 2,351.6


60

The Gas distribution 2005 revenues and operating income reflect $12.8 million and $9.0 million, respectively, for amounts recorded in connection with the rate relief which became effective during the fourth quarter of 2005.

Tropical Shipping’s vessels are under foreign registry, and its containers are considered instruments of international trade. Although the majority of its long-lived assets are foreign owned and its revenues are derived from foreign operations, the functional currency is generally the U.S. dollar. The 2005 income tax benefit for the shipping segment includes the impact of the tax benefit recorded in connection with the Jobs Act (approximately $17 million).

Nicor’s other business segments operate primarily in northern Illinois and include businesses that market energy-related products and services at retail to residential and small business consumers through Nicor Services and Nicor Solutions, and natural gas at the wholesale level through Nicor Enerchange. They also include a 50-percent-owned natural gas pipeline joint venture with Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (Horizon Pipeline), and a 50-percent-owned retail energy marketing joint venture (Nicor Energy) whose operations were terminated in 2003. Financial information about these other business segments is combined under the heading “Other energy ventures” on the chart that follows. Intersegment revenues on the chart are presented prior to elimination.

Nicor management evaluates segment performance based on operating income. Intercompany billing for goods and services exchanged between segments is based generally upon direct and indirect costs incurred, but in some instances is based upon the prevailing tariffed or market-based price of the provider.

The majority of intersegment revenues represent gas distribution revenues related to customers entering into utility-bill management contracts with Nicor Solutions. Under the utility-bill management contracts, Nicor Solutions bills a fixed amount to a customer, regardless of changes in natural gas prices or weather, and in exchange pays the customer’s utility bills from Nicor Gas. Intersegment revenues are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

The $30.3 million operating income in the “Corporate and eliminations” column for 2005 includes $29.9 million of net insurance recoveries and earnings thereon of securities class action and derivative lawsuit settlements in the first and second quarters of 2005. The $44.0 million operating loss in the “Corporate and eliminations” column for 2004 includes a $38.5 million securities class action settlement charge recorded in the first quarter of 2004. See Note 19 - Contingencies - Securities Class Actions, Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits and Other. Corporate operating expenses also include unallocated legal and business development costs.

Financial data by business segment is as follows (in millions):
















61


 
Nicor Inc.
                                     
 
                   
Other 
   
Corporate
       
 
         
Gas 
         
energy
   
and
       
 
         
distribution 
   
Shipping
   
ventures
   
eliminations
   
Consolidated
 
Operating revenues
                                     
 2005
   
 
                               
External customers
       
$
2,824.5
 
$
378.5
 
$
154.8
 
$
-
 
$
3,357.8
 
Intersegment
         
85.1
   
-
   
2.2
   
(87.3
)
 
-
 
           
2,909.6
   
378.5
   
157.0
   
(87.3
)
 
3,357.8
 
 2004
                                   
External customers
         
2,282.2
   
310.7
   
146.8
   
-
   
2,739.7
 
Intersegment
         
79.9
   
-
   
8.5
   
(88.4
)
 
-
 
           
2,362.1
   
310.7
   
155.3
   
(88.4
)
 
2,739.7
 
 2003
   
 
                               
External customers
         
2,300.7
   
272.2
   
89.8
   
-
   
2,662.7
 
Intersegment
         
50.9
   
-
   
6.7
   
(57.6
)
 
-
 
           
2,351.6
   
272.2
   
96.5
   
(57.6
)
 
2,662.7
 
                                       
Operating income (loss)
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
116.9
 
$
40.4
 
$
14.1
 
$
30.3
 
$
201.7
 
 2004
   
 
   
130.8
   
31.6
   
19.3
   
(44.0
)
 
137.7
 
 2003
   
 
   
166.2
   
22.7
   
7.9
   
(7.4
)
 
189.4
 
                                       
Equity investment income (loss), net
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
3.3
 
$
6.0
 
$
9.3
 
 2004
   
 
   
(.1
)
 
-
   
2.2
   
4.2
   
6.3
 
 2003
       
(.1
)
 
-
   
11.5
   
3.9
   
15.3
 
                                       
Interest income
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
4.3
 
$
2.9
 
$
.8
 
$
(2.0
)
$
6.0
 
 2004
   
 
   
1.0
   
1.1
   
.3
   
(.1
)
 
2.3
 
 2003
       
1.6
   
.9
   
.6
   
(1.2
)
 
1.9
 
                                       
Other income (expense), net
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
(.5
)
$
.3
 
$
-
 
$
1.0
 
$
0.8
 
 2004
   
 
   
(2.4
)
 
(.4
)
 
.1
   
2.9
   
0.2
 
 2003
   
 
   
.2
   
(.1
)
 
-
   
-
   
0.1
 
                                       
Interest expense, net of
                                     
amounts capitalized
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
42.1
 
$
1.2
 
$
1.2
 
$
2.3
 
$
46.8
 
 2004
   
 
   
37.2
   
.7
   
.5
   
2.8
   
41.2
 
 2003
   
 
   
36.8
   
.5
   
.4
   
(.4
)
 
37.3
 
                                       
Income tax expense (benefit), net
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
26.1
 
$
(7.5
)
$
6.8
 
$
9.3
 
$
34.7
 
 2004
   
 
   
33.1
   
8.1
   
8.7
   
(19.7
)
 
30.2
 
 2003
   
 
   
48.0
   
6.0
   
7.9
   
(2.3
)
 
59.6
 
                                       
Cumulative effect of accounting
                                     
change, net of tax
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 2004
       
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
 2003
   
 
   
-
   
-
   
(4.5
)
 
-
   
(4.5
)
                                       
Property, plant and
                                     
equipment, net
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
2,530.1
 
$
119.9
 
$
9.3
 
$
(.2
)
$
2,659.1
 
 2004
       
2,416.4
   
125.9
   
7.6
   
(.1
)
 
2,549.8
 
 2003
   
 
   
2,345.2
   
133.3
   
5.7
   
-
   
2,484.2
 
                                       
Capital expenditures
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
186.4
 
$
10.7
 
$
3.4
 
$
(.1
)
$
200.4
 
 2004
   
 
   
175.1
   
9.0
   
3.2
   
-
   
187.3
 
 2003
   
 
   
172.9
   
5.9
   
2.5
   
-
   
181.3
 
                                       
Depreciation
                                     
 2005
   
 
 
$
154.5
 
$
16.2
 
$
1.7
 
$
-
 
$
172.4
 
 2004
       
148.8
   
16.4
   
1.4
   
-
   
166.6
 
 2003
   
 
   
143.5
   
16.9
   
1.3
   
-
   
161.7
 
 
62
 


14. EQUITY INVESTMENT INCOME, NET

Equity investment income, net included the following (in millions):

 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
                       
Triton
$
7.4
   
$
6.5
   
$
5.5
 
Nicor Energy
 
.1
     
-
     
9.6
 
Affordable housing investments
 
(1.3
)
   
(2.4
)
   
(1.6
)
Horizon Pipeline
 
1.7
     
1.6
     
1.5
 
All other
 
1.4
     
.6
     
.3
 
 
$
9.3
   
$
6.3
   
$
15.3
 

In 2005, 2004 and 2003, Nicor received dividends from equity investees of $5.5 million, $5.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

Nicor’s investment in Nicor Energy was written off during 2002. In 2003, Nicor Energy ceased operations and Nicor recorded gains of $9.6 million upon the receipt of cash from Nicor Energy.

15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Horizon Pipeline charged Nicor Gas $10.4 million in each year ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 for natural gas transportation under rates that have been accepted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

EN Engineering, a 50-percent-owned joint venture of Nicor, charged Nicor Gas $4.4 million for engineering and corrosion services rendered for 2005. In 2004 and 2003, EN Engineering charged Nicor Technologies, a wholly owned subsidiary of Nicor, $4.0 million and $4.4 million, respectively for these services.

In addition, certain related parties may acquire regulated utility services at rates approved by the ICC.

16. COMMITMENTS

As of December 31, 2005, Nicor had purchase commitments with payments due as follows (in millions):
 
   
Purchase obligations
 
Operating leases
 
Other long-term obligations
 
                     
2006
 
$
23.8
 
$
36.5
 
$
2.6
 
2007
   
10.4
   
28.2
   
1.7
 
2008
   
10.4
   
23.2
   
1.3
 
2009
   
10.4
   
11.1
   
.4
 
2010
   
10.4
   
4.0
   
.2
 
After 2010
   
14.0
   
16.6
   
.6
 
   
$
79.4
 
$
119.6
 
$
6.8
 

Purchase obligations consist of a natural gas transportation agreement and property, plant and equipment purchases. Operating leases are primarily for vessels, containers and equipment in the shipping segment, office space and equipment in the gas distribution segment and office space for the other energy ventures.


63

Tropical Shipping has certain equipment operating leases which include purchase and/or renewal options, at fair market amounts at the time of purchase or renewal. Rental expense under operating leases was $37.2 million, $27.5 million and $23.7 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Other long-term obligations consist primarily of equity fund commitments.

17. RATE PROCEEDING

Nicor Gas filed a request with the ICC for an overall increase in base rates on November 4, 2004.  In late 2005, Nicor Gas received approval from the ICC for a $54.2 million base rate increase which reflected an allowed rate of return on original-cost rate base of 8.85 percent, including a 10.51 percent cost of common equity. The order also included the authorization to pass all Chicago Hub revenues directly through to customers as a credit to Nicor Gas’ Purchased Gas Adjustment (“PGA”) rider and the shifting of certain storage-related costs from the PGA rider to base rates.  In addition, rates were established using a 10-year average for weather as opposed to the previous use of a 30-year average. The new rates were implemented in the fourth quarter of 2005.

In October 2005, Nicor Gas and six other parties filed applications for rehearing of the final order of the rate case.  The ICC granted rehearing on seven issues, only two of which relate to the amount of the approved annual net revenue increase, and denied rehearing on all other issues raised in the applications.
 
The ICC is expected to issue its decision on rehearing in March 2006. As a result of the rehearing process, the actual annual net revenue increase approved by the ICC could change. Based on the positions of the parties on the rehearing issues, the outcome could range from an approximate $7.1 million reduction to the annual net revenue increase to an approximate $0.9 million additional annual increase. Rate changes, if any, resulting from the outcome of the rehearing process would be prospective.

As a result of the rate order which became effective in the fourth quarter of 2005, certain storage-related costs are now recorded in operating and maintenance expense. In aggregate, the fourth quarter storage-related gas costs in operating and maintenance expense totaled $6.5 million. Such costs incurred prior to the effective date of the rate order were recorded as cost of gas.

18. GUARANTEES AND INDEMNITIES

Nicor and certain subsidiaries enter into various financial and performance guarantees and indemnities providing assurance to third parties.

Financial guarantees. The company has issued guarantees of affiliate obligations to vendors and other third parties, requiring Nicor to repay the obligations should its affiliates default. The obligations of the company’s wholly owned subsidiaries are reflected in Nicor’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, while the obligations of its unconsolidated equity investments are not. As of December 31, 2005 Nicor had guaranteed the payment of $0.6 million of lease obligations extending through February 2007 in support of one of its unconsolidated equity investee’s operations, and no liability has been recorded for this guarantee. Nicor believes the likelihood of payment under this guarantee is remote.

Tropic Equipment Leasing Inc. (“TEL”), an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of Nicor, holds the company’s interests in Triton. TEL has a contingent liability to restore to zero any deficit in its equity account for income tax purposes in the unlikely event that Triton is liquidated and a deficit balance remains. This contingent liability continues for the life of the Triton partnerships and any payment is effectively limited to the assets of TEL, which were approximately $7 million at December 31, 2005. Nicor believes the likelihood of any such payment by TEL is remote and has recorded no liability for this contingency.




64

Performance guarantees. Nicor Services markets separately priced product warranty contracts that provide for the repair of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, natural gas lines, and other appliances within homes. Revenues from these product warranty contracts are recognized ratably over the coverage period, and related repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. Repair expenses of $5.0 million, $2.9 million and $3.4 million were incurred in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
 
Indemnities. In certain instances, Nicor has undertaken to indemnify current property owners and others against costs associated with the effects and/or remediation of contaminated sites for which the company may be responsible under applicable federal or state environmental laws, generally with no limitation as to the amount. Aside from liabilities recorded in connection with coal tar cleanup, as discussed in Note 19 - Contingencies - Manufactured Gas Plant Sites, Nicor believes that the likelihood of payment under these indemnifications is either remote, or the fair value of the indemnification is immaterial, and no liability has been recorded for these indemnifications.

Nicor has also indemnified, to the fullest extent permitted under the laws of the State of Illinois and any other applicable laws, its present and former directors, officers and employees against expenses they may incur in connection with litigation they are a party to by reason of their association with the company. There is generally no limitation as to the amount. The company recorded expense of $2.2 million for 2003 in connection with this indemnification. No significant additional expense was recorded in 2004 and 2005. As of December 31, 2005, the company had a remaining estimated liability of $0.2 million in connection with this indemnification. While the company does not expect to incur significant additional costs under these indemnifications, it is not possible to estimate the maximum potential payments.

19. CONTINGENCIES

The following contingencies of Nicor are in various stages of investigation or disposition. Although in some cases the company is unable to estimate the amount of loss reasonably possible in addition to any amounts already recognized, it is possible that the resolution of these contingencies, either individually or in aggregate, will require the company to take charges against, or will result in reductions in, future earnings. It is the opinion of management that the resolution of these contingencies, either individually or in aggregate, could be material to earnings in a particular period but is not expected to have a material adverse impact on Nicor’s liquidity or financial condition.

Performance-Based Rate (“PBR”) Plan. Nicor Gas’ PBR plan for natural gas costs went into effect in 2000 and was terminated by the company effective January 1, 2003. Under the PBR plan, Nicor Gas’ total gas supply costs were compared to a market-sensitive benchmark. Savings and losses relative to the benchmark were determined annually and shared equally with sales customers. The PBR plan is currently under ICC review.

There are allegations that the company acted improperly in connection with the PBR plan, and the ICC and others are reviewing these allegations. On June 27, 2002 the Citizens Utility Board (“CUB”) filed a motion to reopen the record in the ICC’s proceedings to review the PBR plan (the “ICC Proceedings”). As a result of the motion to reopen, Nicor Gas, the Cook County State’s Attorney Office (“CCSAO”), the staff of the ICC and CUB entered into a stipulation providing for additional discovery. The Illinois Attorney General’s Office (“IAGO”) has also intervened in this matter. In addition, the IAGO issued Civil Investigation Demands (“CIDs”) to CUB and the ICC staff. The CIDs ordered that CUB and the ICC staff produce all documents relating to any claims that Nicor Gas may have presented, or caused to be presented, false information related to its PBR plan. Parties who were plaintiffs in a dismissed class action proceeding against the company could potentially intervene in these proceedings. The company has committed to cooperate fully in the reviews of the PBR plan.

In response to these allegations, on July 18, 2002, the Nicor Board of Directors appointed a special committee of independent, non-management directors to conduct an inquiry into issues surrounding natural gas purchases, sales, transportation, storage and such other matters as may come to the attention of

65

the special committee in the course of its investigation. The special committee presented the report of its counsel (“Report”) to Nicor’s Board of Directors on October 28, 2002.

In response, the Nicor Board of Directors directed the company’s management to, among other things, make appropriate adjustments to account for, and fully address, the adverse consequences to ratepayers of the items noted in the Report, and conduct a detailed study of the adequacy of internal accounting and regulatory controls. The adjustments were made in prior years’ financial statements resulting in a $24.8 million liability. Included in such $24.8 million liability is a $4.1 million loss contingency. A $1.8 million adjustment to the previously recorded liability, which is discussed below, was made in the third quarter of 2004 increasing the recorded liability to $26.6 million. In addition, Nicor Gas estimates that there is $26.9 million due to the company from the 2002 PBR plan year, which has not been recognized in the financial statements due to uncertainties surrounding the PBR plan. The net of these items and interest income on certain components results in a $1.0 million reimbursement the company is seeking as of December 31, 2005, pending resolution of the proceedings discussed below. By the end of 2003 the company completed steps to correct the weaknesses and deficiencies identified in the detailed study of the adequacy of internal controls.

Pursuant to the agreement of all parties, including the company, the ICC re-opened the 1999 and 2000 purchased gas adjustment filings for review of certain transactions related to the PBR plan and consolidated the reviews of the 1999-2002 purchased gas adjustment filings with the PBR plan review.

On February 5, 2003, the CCSAO and CUB filed a motion for $27 million in sanctions against the company in the ICC Proceedings. In that motion, CCSAO and CUB alleged that Nicor Gas’ responses to certain CUB data requests were false. Also on February 5, 2003, CUB stated in a press release that, in addition to $27 million in sanctions, it would seek additional refunds to consumers. On March 5, 2003, the ICC staff filed a response brief in support of CUB’s motion for sanctions. On May 1, 2003, the Administrative Law Judges issued a ruling denying CUB and CCSAO’s motion for sanctions. CUB has filed an appeal of the motion for sanctions with the ICC, and the ICC has indicated that it will not rule on the appeal until the final disposition of the ICC Proceedings. It is not possible to determine how the ICC will resolve the claims of CCSAO, CUB or other parties to the ICC Proceedings.

In November 2003, the ICC staff, CUB, CCSAO and the IAGO filed their respective direct testimony in the ICC Proceedings. The ICC staff is seeking refunds to customers of approximately $108 million and CUB and CCSAO were jointly seeking refunds to customers of approximately $143 million. The IAGO direct testimony alleges adjustments in a range from $145 million to $190 million. The IAGO testimony as filed is presently unclear as to the amount which IAGO seeks to have refunded to customers. On February 27, 2004 the above referenced intervenors filed their rebuttal testimony in the ICC Proceedings. In such rebuttal testimony, CUB and CCSAO amended the alleged amount to be refunded to customers from approximately $143 million to $190 million. Nicor Gas filed rebuttal testimony in January 2004, which is consistent with the findings of the special committee Report. Nicor Gas seeks a reimbursement of approximately $1 million as referenced above. The parties to the ICC Proceedings have agreed to a stay of the evidentiary hearings on this matter in order to undertake additional third party discovery from Entergy-Koch Trading, LP (“EKT”), a natural gas, storage and transportation trader and consultant with whom Nicor did business under the PBR plan.

During the course of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigation discussed below, the company became aware of additional information relating to the activities of individuals affecting the PBR plan for the period from 1999 through 2002, including information consisting of third party documents and recordings of telephone conversations from EKT. Review of additional information completed in the third quarter of 2004 resulted in the $1.8 million adjustment to the previously recorded liability referenced above.



66

Although the Report of the special committee’s counsel did not find that there was criminal activity or fraud, a review of this additional information (which was not available to the independent counsel who prepared the Report) and re-interviews of certain Nicor Gas personnel in 2004 indicated that certain former Nicor Gas personnel may have engaged in potentially fraudulent conduct regarding the PBR plan in violation of company policy, and in possible violation of SEC rules and applicable law. Further, certain former Nicor Gas personnel also may have attempted to conceal their conduct in connection with an ICC review of the PBR plan. The company continues to cooperate with the SEC, the U.S. Attorney’s office and the ICC on this matter. The company has reviewed all third party information it has obtained and will continue to review any additional third party information the company may obtain. The company terminated four employees in connection with this matter in the third quarter of 2004.

Nicor is unable to predict the outcome of any of the foregoing reviews or the company’s potential exposure thereunder. Because the PBR plan and historical gas costs are still under ICC review, the final outcome could be materially different than the amounts reflected in the company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2005.

Nicor Energy. Nicor Energy was a retail energy marketing joint venture owned 50 percent by Nicor and 50 percent by Dynegy Marketing and Trade, that was dissolved in 2005, having liquidated all its assets and resolved all its liabilities.

As a result of an audit and review process in 2002, accounting irregularities were identified at Nicor Energy. Appropriate accounting adjustments were made by Nicor in restated financial statements previously filed with the SEC.

Nicor’s investment in Nicor Energy was written off in the third quarter of 2002 due to the belief at that time that Nicor ultimately would not recover its investment balance. During 2003, Nicor recorded gains upon the receipt of cash from Nicor Energy. No recoveries occurred during 2004 and recoveries received in 2005 have been immaterial, and any future gains or losses are not expected to be material.

On December 10, 2003, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois indicted three former employees of Nicor Energy and an outside lawyer for Nicor Energy. The indictments alleged that the defendants fraudulently deprived Nicor Energy of their honest services and caused a loss to investors in Nicor Inc. and Dynegy Inc. During the time period covered by the indictments, Nicor Energy was a stand alone entity with its own management and was operated independently from Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas. None of the individuals indicted are employees of Nicor Inc. or Nicor Gas nor were they at the time of the charged conduct. The three former employees of Nicor Energy have pled guilty to certain charges. Separately, on December 10, 2003, the SEC filed its own civil enforcement action against the same three former employees and one additional former employee of Nicor Energy. While Nicor is unable to predict the final outcome of these matters, the resolution of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the company’s cash flow, financial condition or results of operations.

SEC and U.S. Attorney Inquiries. In 2002, the staff of the SEC informed Nicor and Nicor Energy that the SEC is conducting a formal inquiry regarding both the PBR plan and Nicor Energy. A representative of the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois has notified Nicor that that office is conducting an inquiry on the same matters that the SEC is investigating, and a grand jury is also reviewing these matters. In April 2004, Nicor was advised by the SEC Division of Enforcement that it intended to recommend to the SEC that it bring a civil injunctive action against Nicor, alleging that Nicor violated Sections 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC may also seek injunctive relief, disgorgement and civil penalties. The SEC staff invited Nicor to make a formal response (known as a Wells Submission) with respect to the proposed recommendation. In June 2004, Nicor filed its Wells Submission with the SEC. In addition, in connection with the SEC’s invitation to the company to make a Wells Submission, the SEC informed the company of additional sources of

67

information relating to activities affecting the PBR plan, the status of which is addressed in detail in the PBR plan section set forth above. In August 2004, Nicor withdrew its Wells Submission in light of its continuing review of the newly available additional sources of information referenced above. Nicor continues in its efforts to resolve this matter with the SEC and has requested that the SEC allow Nicor to file an updated Wells Submission if necessary. Nicor is unable to predict the outcome of these inquiries or Nicor’s potential exposure related thereto and has not recorded a liability associated with the outcome of these contingencies.

Securities Class Actions. Following a July 18, 2002 Nicor press release concerning Nicor Energy and the PBR plan, several purported class actions were brought against Nicor, certain current and former officers of Nicor and Arthur Andersen LLP, the company’s former independent auditor. The actions were brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and were consolidated. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants violated Section 10(b) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. On April 16, 2004 Nicor announced that its board of directors had approved an agreement to settle the above referenced action. Under the terms of the settlement, all claims against Nicor and Nicor-related defendants have been dismissed without any finding or admission of wrongdoing or liability, for a payment of $38.5 million. In the first quarter of 2004, the company recorded a litigation charge of $38.5 million related to this agreement. On July 13, 2004 the court granted final approval of the settlement. All appeal rights expired on August 12, 2004.

Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits. Also following Nicor’s issuance of the press release concerning Nicor Energy and the PBR plan, three purported derivative lawsuits were brought against Thomas Fisher (former Chairman and former CEO), Kathleen Halloran (former Executive Vice President Finance and Administration and former Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer) and all of the then members of Nicor’s Board of Directors (the “individual defendants”). Nicor was named as a nominal defendant in all three suits, which were consolidated in an amended complaint. The actions were brought in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division. The plaintiffs alleged that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Nicor by allegedly causing or allowing Nicor to disseminate to the market materially misleading and inaccurate information, failing to establish and maintain adequate accounting controls and approving the PBR plan despite allegedly knowing that the plan was unlawful or that ICC approval would be improperly obtained. Plaintiffs also contended that two of the defendants (Mr. Fisher and Mr. Birdsall) engaged in improper insider selling of Nicor stock at inflated prices. The plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and other relief against the individual defendants on behalf of Nicor but did not seek any damages against the company. On January 25, 2005, Nicor announced that its Board of Directors had approved a preliminary agreement to settle the above referenced action. Under the terms of the settlement, all claims against the defendants would be dismissed without any finding or admission of wrongdoing or liability. The settlement obligated Nicor to adopt certain new corporate governance policies and required the payment of $3.5 million in attorneys’ fees and expenses to plaintiffs’ counsel out of the Directors and Officers (“D&O”) insurance proceeds described below. The court granted final approval of the settlement and entered an Order of Dismissal on March 29, 2005. The settlement became final in the second quarter of 2005, when all appeal rights expired. In connection with the derivative settlement, in the first quarter of 2005, Nicor’s excess insurance carrier paid $4 million to Nicor to settle certain claims Nicor had asserted against it arising out of the derivative action and related class action securities litigation. Pursuant to the terms of the derivative settlement, Nicor paid $3.5 million of that $4 million to plaintiffs’ attorneys to reimburse them for the fees and costs expended in pursuing the derivative action. The $0.5 million net of these payments was reflected as “Litigation charges (recoveries), net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the first quarter of 2005.

Fixed Bill Service. On April 29, 2003, a second amended purported class action complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois against Nicor Energy Services Company (“Nicor Services”) alleging violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act (“ICFA”) by Nicor Services relating to the fixed bill service offered by Nicor Services. Nicor Services offered a fixed bill product under which it paid the

68

annual gas service portion of a customer’s Nicor Gas utility bill in exchange for twelve equal monthly payments by the customer to Nicor Services, regardless of changes in the price of natural gas or weather. The plaintiff sought compensatory damages, prejudgment and postjudgment interest, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief on behalf of a proposed class consisting of all purchasers of the fixed bill service from February 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002. On October 7, 2005, the Circuit Court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed class. As a result, if the case proceeds in the Circuit Court, it will be as an individual action on behalf of the named plaintiff alone. The class certification decision remains subject to appeal. Nicor is unable to predict the outcome of this litigation or to reasonably estimate its potential exposure related thereto and has not recorded a liability associated with this contingency.

Gas Line ComfortGuard Service. On May 5, 2005, a consumer class action was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois entitled Rivera v. Nicor Inc., Nicor Gas and Nicor Services.  Nicor, Nicor Gas and Nicor Services were defendants in the case.  The plaintiff alleged deceptive practices relating to the marketing and sale of the Gas Line ComfortGuard service offered by Nicor Services. The plaintiff also alleged violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought damages in an amount equal to the total Gas Line ComfortGuard charges paid by the plaintiff and the putative class members, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees and costs. In the third quarter of 2005, the case was transferred to the Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois. In the first quarter of 2006, Nicor, Nicor Gas and Nicor Services settled the action on an individual basis with the named plaintiff without any admission of wrongdoing or liability. The plaintiff’s case has been dismissed with prejudice and no motion to certify a class was ever filed.

Mercury. Nicor Gas has incurred, and expects to continue to incur, costs related to its historical use of mercury in various kinds of company equipment.

Nicor Gas is a defendant in several private lawsuits, all in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, seeking a variety of unquantified damages (including bodily injury, property and punitive damages) allegedly caused by mercury spillage resulting from the removal of mercury-containing regulators. Under the terms of a class action settlement agreement, Nicor Gas will continue, until 2007, to provide medical screening to persons exposed to mercury from its equipment, and will use reasonable efforts to remove any remaining inside residential mercury regulators by March of 2006. Nicor Gas believes it is in compliance with its obligations under the settlement agreement. The class action settlement permitted class members to “opt out” of the settlement and pursue their claims individually. Nicor Gas is currently defending claims brought by 27 households.

As of December 31, 2005, Nicor Gas had remaining an estimated liability of $17.5 million, representing management’s best estimate of future costs, including potential liabilities relating to remaining lawsuits, based on an evaluation of currently available information. Actual costs may vary from this estimate. The company will continue to reassess its estimated obligation and will record any necessary adjustment, which could be material to operating results in the period recorded.

Nicor Gas continues to pursue recovery from insurers and independent contractors that had performed work for the company. When received, these recoveries are recorded as a reduction to gas distribution operating expense. Nicor Gas recovered approximately $18 million of pretax mercury-related costs, net of legal fees, from insurers and independent contractors in 2003. Amounts recovered during 2004 and 2005 were immaterial. On October 25, 2004 the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois entered judgment in favor of Nicor and Nicor Gas and against various insurers in the amount of $10.2 million with respect to one of Nicor’s and Nicor Gas’ mercury-related insurance claims. The insurers filed an appeal of the judgment. On November 29, 2005, the First District Appellate Court reversed the Circuit Court’s judgment in favor of Nicor and Nicor Gas and remanded the case to the Circuit Court for proceedings consistent with the Appellate Court’s decision. On January 3, 2006, Nicor and Nicor Gas filed a petition for leave to appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court.

69

The final disposition of these mercury-related matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the company’s financial condition.

Manufactured Gas Plant Sites. Manufactured gas plants were used in the 1800’s and early to mid 1900’s to produce manufactured gas from coal, creating a coal tar byproduct. Current environmental laws may require the cleanup of coal tar at certain former manufactured gas plant sites.

To date, Nicor Gas has identified about 40 properties for which it may, in part, be responsible. Most of these properties are not presently owned by the company. Information regarding preliminary site reviews has been presented to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for certain properties. More detailed investigations and remedial activities are complete, in progress or planned at many of these sites. The results of the detailed site-by-site investigations determine the extent additional remediation is necessary and provide a basis for estimating additional future costs. As of December 31, 2005 the company had recorded a liability of $19.5 million. In accordance with ICC authorization, the company is and has been recovering these costs from its customers, subject to annual prudence reviews.

In December 2001, a purported class action lawsuit was filed against Exelon Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company and Nicor Gas in the Circuit Court of Cook County alleging, among other things, that the ongoing cleanup of a former manufactured gas plant site in Oak Park, Illinois was inadequate. Since then, additional lawsuits have been filed related to this same former manufactured gas plant site. These lawsuits seek, in part, unspecified damages for property damage, nuisance, and various personal injuries that allegedly resulted from exposure to contaminants allegedly emanating from the site, and punitive damages. Management cannot predict the outcome of this litigation or the company’s potential exposure thereto and has not recorded a liability associated with this contingency.

In April 2002, Nicor Gas was named as a defendant, together with Commonwealth Edison Company, in a lawsuit brought by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (the “MWRDGC”) under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act seeking recovery of past and future remediation costs and a declaration of the level of appropriate cleanup for a former manufactured gas plant site in Skokie, Illinois now owned by the MWRDGC. In January 2003, the suit was amended to include a claim under the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Management cannot predict the outcome of this litigation or the company’s potential exposure thereto and has not recorded a liability associated with this contingency.

Since costs and recoveries relating to the cleanup of manufactured gas plant sites are passed directly through to customers in accordance with ICC regulations, subject to an annual ICC prudence review, the final disposition of manufactured gas plant matters is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Other. On April 27, 2004 one of Nicor’s D&O insurance carriers agreed to pay $29.0 million to a third party escrow agent on behalf of Nicor and its insured directors and officers to be used to satisfy Nicor directors’ and officers’ liabilities and expenses associated with claims asserted against them in a securities class action, the related shareholder derivative lawsuit described above and related matters, with any remaining balance to be paid to Nicor. Under the terms of the derivative settlement, once the settlement became final (because all appeal rights had expired), the escrow was terminated and the $29.0 million, plus earnings of approximately $0.4 million, held by the escrow agent was paid to Nicor in the second quarter of 2005. These recoveries have been recorded in “Litigation charges (recoveries), net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. In the second half of 2005, Nicor received $2.8 million of additional insurance proceeds related to legal defense costs. These additional proceeds have been recorded in “Other corporate expenses and eliminations” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. Nicor also continues to seek reimbursement for other expenses from its excess insurance carrier in connection with the same

70

matters but is unable to predict the outcome of this matter and therefore no additional potential insurance recoveries have been reflected in the financial statements.

In addition to the matters set forth above, the company is involved in legal or administrative proceedings before various courts and agencies with respect to general claims, rates, taxes, environmental, gas cost prudence reviews and other matters. Although unable to determine the ultimate outcome of these other contingencies, management believes that these amounts are appropriately reflected in the financial statements, including the recording of appropriate liabilities when reasonably estimable.

20. QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)

Summarized quarterly financial data is presented below (in millions, except per share data).

 
Quarter ended
 
Mar. 31
 
June 30
 
Sept. 30
 
Dec. 31
                               
2005
                             
Operating revenues
$
1,179.8
   
$
484.4
   
$
336.0
   
$
1,357.5
 
Operating income
 
69.8
     
58.0
     
.6
     
73.3
 
Net income (loss)
 
43.7
     
33.4
     
(2.7
)
   
62.0
 
Earnings (loss) per common share
                             
Basic
 
.99
     
.76
     
(.06
)
   
1.40
 
Diluted
 
.99
     
.75
     
(.06
)
   
1.40
 
                               
2004
                             
Operating revenues
$
1,115.7
   
$
429.5
   
$
299.9
   
$
894.6
 
Operating income (loss)
 
34.3
     
33.1
     
(9.6
)
   
79.9
 
Net income (loss)
 
19.6
     
19.5
     
(11.6
)
   
47.7
 
Earnings (loss) per common share
                             
Basic
 
.44
     
.44
     
(.26
)
   
1.08
 
Diluted
 
.44
     
.44
     
(.26
)
   
1.08
 
                               

The second quarter of 2005 included $29.4 million of operating income related to insurance recoveries and earnings thereon related to the securities class action and derivative lawsuit settlements. The fourth quarter of 2005 included revenues of $12.8 million and operating income of $9.0 million recorded in connection with the rate relief that became effective during the quarter. Net income in the fourth quarter of 2005 includes the impact of the tax benefit recorded in connection with the Jobs Act of approximately $17 million. The first quarter of 2004 included a $38.5 million pretax litigation charge to operating expenses related to an agreement to settle securities class lawsuits.

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the


71

design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Evaluation”).

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the Evaluation, the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, were effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in United States Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:

1.  
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

2.  
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company, and;

3.  
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company.

Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that the company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005. Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.



72

There has been no change in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Information on directors is contained under the Election of Directors and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance sections in Nicor’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 10, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information about the audit committee financial expert is contained under the Audit Committee Report section in Nicor’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 10, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information about executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K, Executive Officers of the Registrant, and is incorporated herein by reference. Executive officers of the company are elected annually by the Board of Directors.

In addition, information about executive officers is contained under the Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance section in Nicor’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 10, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.

The company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the company’s directors, officers and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to or waiver from a provision of such Code of Ethics as it applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions and that relates to certain topics, by posting such information on the company’s investor relations section of its internet site at www.nicor.com.

The company has disclosed its Code of Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Corporate Governance Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, and Corporate Governance Guidelines on the company’s investor relations section of its internet site at www.nicor.com. Any shareholder may also request this information in print form from the company’s Investor Relations department.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information on executive compensation is contained under the Compensation Committee Report and Executive Compensation sections in Nicor’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 10, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.







73

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information on security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is contained under the Security Ownership of Management and Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock sections in Nicor’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 10, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
Plan category
(a)
 
 
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
(b)
 
 
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
(c)
 
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 
 
1,559,658
 
 
$ 35.41 
 
 
889,465 (1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
-
Total
1,559,658
$ 35.41
889,465

(1)  
This number includes 431,184 shares issuable under the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended. These shares can be used for stock options, alternate stock rights, restricted stock and performance award units, including awards under the Stock Deferral Plan, which allows eligible key executives and managerial employees to convert up to 50 percent of their cash awards from annual and long-term incentive plans into Nicor common stock, the receipt of which is deferred. The remaining 458,281 shares are issuable under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Information about certain relationships and related transactions is contained under the Certain Relationships and Related Transactions section in Nicor’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 10, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information on principal accountant fees and services is contained under the Principal Accountant Fees and Services section in Nicor’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 10, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.












74



PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

a)

1) Financial Statements:

See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, filed herewith, for a list of financial statements.

2) Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule
   
Number
 
Page
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
36
II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
76

   
Schedules other than those listed are omitted because they are not applicable.

3) Exhibits Filed:

See Exhibit Index filed herewith.































75

 
 
Nicor Inc.
                                   
                                     
Schedule II
                                   
                                     
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                   
(millions)
                                   
                                     
 
     
 Additions
                   
 
 
Balance at 
   
Charged to
   
Charged to
                 
Balance
 
 
beginning 
   
costs and
   
other
                 
at end
Description
 
of period
   
expenses
   
accounts
       
Deductions
       
of period
                                     
2005
                                   
                                     
Allowance for doubtful
                                   
accounts receivable
$
21.9
 
$
44.1
 
$
-
     
$
34.5
 
(a
)
$
31.5
                                     
Accrued mercury-related costs
 
20.2
   
-
   
-
       
2.7
 
(b
)
 
17.5
                                     
Accrued manufactured gas plant
                                   
environmental costs
 
36.8
   
-
   
0.6
 
(c
)
 
17.9
 
(b
)
 
19.5
                                     
2004
                                   
                                     
Allowance for doubtful
                                   
accounts receivable
$
21.2
 
$
36.0
 
$
-
     
$
35.3
 
(a
)
$
21.9
                                     
Accrued mercury-related costs
 
21.9
   
-
   
-
       
1.7
 
(b
)
 
20.2
                                     
Accrued manufactured gas plant
                                   
environmental costs
 
33.2
   
-
   
18.8
 
(c
)
 
15.2
 
(b
)
 
36.8
                                     
2003
                                   
                                     
Allowance for doubtful
                                   
accounts receivable
$
16.9
 
$
30.9
 
$
-
     
$
26.6
 
(a
)
$
21.2
                                     
Accrued mercury-related costs
 
23.4
   
-
   
-
       
1.5
 
(b
)
 
21.9
                                     
Accrued manufactured gas plant
                                   
environmental costs
 
61.9
   
-
   
14.2
 
(c
)
 
42.9
 
(b
)
 
33.2
                                     
(a) Accounts receivable written off, net of recoveries.
                                   
(b) Expenditures, other adjustments.
                                   
(c) Accrual of estimated future remediation costs that are deferred as regulatory assets.
                                   
 
                                   
 
76
 

 
Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

   
Nicor Inc.
     
Date February 24, 2006 
 
/s/ RICHARD L. HAWLEY
   
Richard L. Hawley
   
Executive Vice President and
   
Chief Financial Officer
     
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 24, 2006.
     
Signature
 
Title
     
/s/ RUSS M. STROBEL
   
Russ M. Strobel
 
Chairman, President and
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
Chief Executive Officer
     
/s/ RICHARD L. HAWLEY
   
Richard L. Hawley
 
Executive Vice President and
(Principal Financial Officer
 
Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)
   
     
ROBERT M. BEAVERS, JR.*
 
Director
     
BRUCE P. BICKNER*
 
Director
     
JOHN H. BIRDSALL, III*
 
Director
     
THOMAS A. DONAHOE*
 
Director
     
RAYMOND A. JEAN*
 
Director
     
JOHN E. JONES*
 
Director
     
DENNIS J. KELLER*
 
Director
     
R. EDEN MARTIN*
 
Director
     
GEORGIA R. NELSON*
 
Director
     
WILLIAM A. OSBORN*
 
Director
     
JOHN RAU*
 
Director
     
JOHN F. RIORDAN*
 
Director
     
 
*
By /s/ RICHARD L. HAWLEY
   
Richard L. Hawley
   
(Attorney-in-fact)


77



Exhibit Index

Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description of Document
     
3.01
*
Articles of Incorporation of the company. (File No. 2-55451, Form S-14, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 1-03 and Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 thereto.)
     
3.02
*
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the company. (Proxy Statement dated April 20, 1979, Nicor Inc., Item 3 thereto.)
     
3.03
*
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the company. (File No. 2-68777, Form S-16, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 2-01.)
     
3.04
*
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the company. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1985, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 3-03.)
     
3.05
*
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the company. (Proxy Statement dated March 12, 1987, Nicor Inc., Exhibit A and Exhibit B thereto.)
     
3.06
*
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the company. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1992, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 3-06.)
     
3.07
*
Amendments to Articles of Incorporation of the company. (Proxy Statement dated March 9, 1994, Nicor Inc., Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit B thereto.)
     
3.08
*
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the company. (Proxy Statement dated March 6, 1998, Nicor Inc., Item 2 thereto.)
     
3.09
*
By-Laws of the company as amended by the company’s Board of Directors on January 15, 2004. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2003, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 3.09.)
     
4.01
*
Indenture of Commonwealth Edison Company to Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7296, Form 10-K for 1995, Nicor Gas, Exhibit 4.01.)
     
4.02
*
Indenture of Adoption of Nicor Gas to Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Trustee, dated February 9, 1954. (File No. 1-7296, Form 10-K for 1995, Nicor Gas, Exhibit 4.02.)
     
4.03
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated February 15, 1998, of Nicor Gas to Harris Trust and Savings Bank, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7296, Form 10-K for 1997, Nicor Gas, Exhibit 4.19.)
     
4.04
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated February 1, 1999, of Nicor Gas to Harris Trust and Savings Bank, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7296, Form 10-K for 1998, Nicor Gas, Exhibit 4.19.)






78


Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description of Document
     
4.05
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated February 1, 2001, of Nicor Gas to BNY Midwest Trust Company, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7296, Form 10-K for 2000, Nicor Gas, Exhibit 4.17.)
     
4.06
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated May 15, 2001, of Nicor Gas to BNY Midwest Trust Company, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7296, Form 10-Q for June 2001, Nicor Gas, Exhibit 4.01.)
     
4.07
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated August 15, 2001, of Nicor Gas to BNY Midwest Trust Company, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7296, Form 10-Q for September 2001, Nicor Gas, Exhibit 4.01.)
     
4.08
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated December 15, 2001, of Nicor Gas to BNY Midwest Trust Company, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7296, Form 10-K for 2001, Nicor Gas, Exhibit 4.20.)
     
4.09
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2003, of Nicor Gas to BNY Midwest Trust Company, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2003, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 4.10.)
     
4.10
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2003, of Nicor Gas to BNY Midwest Trust Company, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2003, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 4.11.)
     
4.11
*
Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2003, of Nicor Gas to BNY Midwest Trust Company, Trustee, under Indenture dated as of January 1, 1954. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2003, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 4.12.)
     
10.01
*
1984 Nicor Officers’ Capital Accumulation Plan Participation Agreement. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1988, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10-10.)
     
10.01(a)
*
1985 Nicor Officers’ Capital Accumulation Plan Participation Agreement. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1988, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10-10(a).)
     
10.02
*
1984 Nicor Directors’ Capital Accumulation Plan Participation Agreement. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1983, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10-13.)
     
10.02(a)
*
1985 Nicor Directors’ Capital Accumulation Plan Participation Agreement. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1984, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10-13(a).)
     
10.03
*
Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1983, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10-16.)
     
10.04
*
Directors’ Pension Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1985, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10-18.)
     
10.05
*
Flexible Spending Account for Executives. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1986, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10-20.)


79

Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description of Document
     
10.06
*
Amendment and Restatement of the Nicor Gas Incentive Compensation Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1986, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10-21.)
     
10.07
*
Nicor Inc. 1989 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (Filed with Nicor Inc. Proxy Statement, dated April 20, 1989, Exhibit A.)
     
10.08
*
Nicor Inc. Stock Deferral Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for September 1996, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.01.)
     
10.09
*
Amendment to Nicor Inc. Stock Deferral Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1997, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.22.)
     
10.10
*
Nicor Inc. 1995 Directors’ Stock Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for September 1996, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.02.)
     
10.11
*
Nicor Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (Filed as appendix to the Nicor Inc. Proxy Statement, dated March 6, 1997.)
 
   
10.12
*
Security Payment Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 1999, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.24.)
     
10.13
*
Amendment and Restatement of Nicor Gas Supplementary Retirement Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2000, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.01.)
     
10.14
*
Amendment and Restatement of Nicor Gas Supplementary Savings Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2000, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.02.)
     
10.15
*
First Amendment to Agreements Restating 1984 and 1985 Nicor Capital Accumulation Plan Participation Agreements for Officers and Directors. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2000, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.04.)
     
10.16
*
First Amendment to Nicor 1989 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2000, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.05.)
     
10.17
*
First Amendment to Nicor 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2000, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.06.)
     
10.18
*
Second Amendment to Nicor Stock Deferral Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2000, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.07.)
     
10.19
*
Change-in-Control Agreement, dated December 20, 2000, between Nicor Inc. and Mr. Strobel. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2001, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.31.)
     
10.20
*
Second Amendment and Restatement to Nicor Salary Deferral Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for September 30, 2002, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.01.)
     
10.21
*
First Amendment to the Change-in-Control Agreement, dated November 22, 2002, between Nicor Inc. and Mr. Strobel. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2002, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.26.)


80
 

Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description of Document
     
10.22
*
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Agreement between Nicor Inc. and Mr. Strobel. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2001, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.32.)
     
10.23
*
Nicor Inc. Supplemental Senior Officer Retirement Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2002, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.28.)
     
10.24
*
2003 Long-Term Incentive Program. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2003, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.01.)
     
10.25
*
Change-in-Control Agreement, dated November 22, 2002, between Nicor Inc. and Mr. Dodge. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2003, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.30.)
     
10.26
*
Change-in-Control Agreement, dated November 25, 2002, between Nicor Inc. and Mr. Gracey. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2003, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.31.)
     
10.27
*
Change-in-Control Agreement, dated December 8, 2003, between Nicor Inc. and Mr. Hawley. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-K for 2003, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.32.)
     
10.28
*
2004 Long-Term Incentive Program. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2004, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.01.)
     
10.29
*
2004 Incentive Compensation Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2004, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.02.)
     
10.30
*
First Amendment to Nicor Inc. 1995 Directors’ Stock Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 2004, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.03.)
     
10.31
*
Agreement, dated July 30, 2004, between Nicor Inc. and Ms. Halloran. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for September 30, 2004, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.03.)
     
10.32
*
Nicor Inc. Stock Deferral Plan Election Form. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for December 17, 2004, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 99.1.)
     
10.33
*
Nicor Inc. Salary Deferral Plan Election Form. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for December 17, 2004, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 99.2.)
     
10.34
*
Nicor Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan Election Form. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for December 17, 2004, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 99.3.)
     
10.35
*
Nicor Gas Supplementary Savings Plan Enrollment Form. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for December 27, 2004, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 99.1.)
     
10.36
*
Stock Payment Election Stock Deferral Plan Form. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for February 15, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 99.1.)
     
10.37
*
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement Form. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for March 17, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.01.)




81
 

Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description of Document
 
   
10.38
*
Performance Cash Unit Agreement Form. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for March 17, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.02.)
     
10.39
*
2005 Long-Term Incentive Program. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for March 17, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.03.)
     
10.40
*
2005 Incentive Compensation Plan. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 31, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.05.)
     
10.41
*
Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement of Shareholder Derivative Litigation dated as of February 16, 2005. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for March 31, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.06.)
     
10.42
*
Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal dated as of March 29, 2005. (File No. 1-7297 Form 10-Q for March 31, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.07.)
     
10.43
*
Directors Compensation. (File No. 1-7297, Form 8-K for September 21, 2005, Nicor Inc.)
     
10.44
*
210-Day Credit Agreement dated as of September 13, 2005. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for September 30, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.02.)
     
10.45
*
5-Year Credit Agreement dated as of September 13, 2005. (File No. 1-7297, Form 10-Q for September 30, 2005, Nicor Inc., Exhibit 10.03.)
     
10.46
 
First Amendment to the Nicor Inc. Salary Deferral Plan.
     
10.47
 
Change-in-Control Agreement, dated July 20, 2004 between Nicor Inc. and Mr. O’Connor.
     
21.01
 
Subsidiaries.
     
23.01
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
     
24.01
 
Powers of Attorney.
     
31.01
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.
     
31.02
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.
     
32.01
 
Section 1350 Certification.
     
32.02
 
Section 1350 Certification.

*  
These exhibits have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to registration statements or to other filings with the Commission and are incorporated herein as exhibits by reference. The file number and exhibit number of each such exhibit, where applicable, are stated, in parentheses, in the description of such exhibit.


 
 
82
 
EX-10.46 2 salarydeferralplan.htm EXHIBIT 10.46 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO NICOR INC SALARY DEFERRAL PLAN Exhibit 10.46 - First Amendment To Nicor Inc Salary Deferral Plan
Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 10.46


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
NICOR INC. SALARY DEFERRAL PLAN


WHEREAS, Nicor Inc., (the “Company”), established and maintains the Nicor Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (“Salary Deferral Plan”)

WHEREAS, amendment of the Salary Deferral Plan is desirable in order to take advantage of special transition rules applicable to the Salary Deferral Plan pursuant to guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”) in order to ease administration of Salary Deferral Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power and authority reserved to the Company pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Salary Deferral Plan and delegated to the undersigned officer by resolution dated November 17, 2005 the Salary Deferral Plan is hereby amended, effective as January 1, 2005 by adding the following Section 5.15 to the Salary Deferral Plan:

“5.15 Section 409A Distributions in 2005. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 2.2(f) and 5.9 and in accordance with IRS Notice 2005-1, each Participant whose Termination Date was due to Normal Retirement or Early Retirement in calendar year 2005 shall be permitted to (i) cancel his Participation Election for salary otherwise payable in 2005 and/or (ii) have any portion of his Account balance that would be subject to Section 409A of the Code paid in a lump sum distribution in 2005.”
 
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officer has caused this First Amendment to be executed on this 15th day of December, 2005.


NICOR INC.


By: /s/ CLAUDIA J. COLALILLO
Claudia J. Colalillo
Its: Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Communications

EX-10.47 3 changeincontroloconnor.htm EXHIBIT 10.47 - CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT GERRY O'CONNOR Exhibit 10.47 - Change in Control Agreement Gerry O'Connor

Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 10.47

CHANGE-IN-CONTROL AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT dated as of July 20, 2004 (the “Agreement Date”) is made by and among Nicor Inc. (the “Company”), an Illinois corporation, and Gerald P. O’Connor (the “Executive”).

ARTICLE I
PURPOSES

The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to assure that the Company and Nicor Gas will have the continued services of the Executive, despite the possibility or occurrence of a Change in Control of the Company. The Board believes it is imperative to reduce the distraction of the Executive that would result from the personal uncertainties caused by a pending or threatened Change in Control, to encourage the Executive’s full attention and dedication to the Company and Nicor Gas, and to provide the Executive with compensation and benefits arrangements upon a Change in Control which are competitive with those of similarly-situated corporations. This Agreement is intended to accomplish these objectives.

ARTICLE II
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

When used in this Agreement, the terms specified below shall have the following meanings:

2.1 The “Agreement Term” shall begin on the Agreement Date and shall continue through December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, and on each December 31 thereafter, the Agreement Term shall automatically be extended for one additional year unless, not later than the preceding June 30, either party shall have given notice that such party does not wish to extend the Agreement Term. If a Change in Control shall have occurred during the Agreement Term (as it may be extended from time to time), the Agreement Term shall continue for a period ending on the two-year anniversary of the date of the Change in Control, but if the Termination Date (as defined below) occurs during that two-year period, then the Agreement Term shall continue until the end of the Severance Period (as defined below). Unless the Termination Date occurs during the two-year period after a Change in Control so that the Agreement Term is extended to include the Severance Period, as provided in the immediately preceding sentence, the Agreement Term shall not extend beyond the two-year anniversary of the Change in Control.

2.2 “Effective Date” means the first date during the Agreement Term on which a Change in Control occurs.

2.3 “Change in Control” means:

2.3.1 The acquisition by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (a “Person”) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of any shares of Common Stock of the Company or any voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors if, as a result of such acquisition, such person owns 20% or more of either (i) the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (the “Outstanding Company Common Stock”), or (ii) the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Company Voting Securities”); provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection 2.3.1, the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (A) any acquisition by the Company, (B) any acquisition by an employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any corporation controlled by the Company (a “Company Plan”), or (C) any acquisition by any corporation pursuant to a transaction which complies with subsections 2.3.3.1, 2.3.3.2 and 2.3.3.3 of this definition; provided further, that for purposes of clause (A), if any Person (other than the Company or any Company Plan) shall become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Outstanding Company Common Stock or 20% or more of the Outstanding Company Voting Securities by reason of an acquisition by the Company, and such Person shall, after such acquisition by the Company, become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of the Outstanding Company Common Stock or any additional Outstanding Company Voting Securities (other than pursuant to any dividend reinvestment plan or arrangement maintained by the Company) and such beneficial ownership is publicly announced, such additional beneficial ownership shall constitute a Change in Control; or

2.3.2 Individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board of Directors of the Company (for purposes of this Section 2.3, the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Incumbent Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election, or nomination for election by the Company shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or publicly threatened election contest (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 promulgated under the Exchange Act) or other actual or publicly threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board of Directors of the Company; or

2.3.3 Consummation, including receipt of any necessary regulatory approval, of (i) a reorganization, merger, consolidation or other business combination involving the Company or (ii) the sale or other disposition of more than 50% of the operating assets of the Company (determined on a consolidated basis), other than in connection with a sale-leaseback or other arrangement resulting in the continued utilization of such assets (or the operating products of such assets) by the Company (any transaction described in part (i) or (ii) being referred to as a “Corporate Transaction”); excluding, however, a Corporate Transaction pursuant to which:

2.3.3.1 all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who are the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to such Corporate Transaction beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 60% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the ultimate parent entity resulting from such Corporate Transaction (including, without limitation, an entity which, as a result of such transaction, owns the Company or all or substantially all of the assets of the Company either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Corporate Transaction of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be;

2.3.3.2 no Person (other than the Company, any Company Plan or related trust, the corporation resulting from such Corporate Transaction, and any Person which beneficially owned, immediately prior to such Corporate Transaction, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of the Outstanding Company Common Stock or the Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be) will beneficially own, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of, respectively, the then outstanding common stock of the ultimate parent entity resulting from such Corporate Transaction or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such entity; and

2.3.3.3 individuals who were members of the Incumbent Board will constitute at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the ultimate parent entity resulting from such Corporate Transaction; or

2.3.4 A tender offer (for which a filing has been made with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) which purports to comply with the requirements of Section 14(d) of the Exchange Act and the corresponding SEC rules) is made for the stock of the Company, which has not been negotiated and approved by the Board, provided that in case of a tender offer described in this subsection 2.3.4, the Change in Control will be deemed to have occurred at the first time during the offer period when the Person (as defined in subsection 2.3.1, above) making the offer beneficially owns or has accepted for payment stock of the Company with 20% or more of the combined voting power of the then Outstanding Company Voting Securities; or

2.3.5 Approval by the shareholders of the Company of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

2.3.6 For purposes of this Section 2.3, (i) the term “Company” shall mean Nicor Inc. and shall include any Successor to Nicor Inc.; and (ii) the term “Successor to Nicor Inc.” shall mean any corporation, partnership, joint venture or other entity that succeeds to the interests of Nicor Inc. by means of a merger, consolidation, or other restructuring that does not constitute a Change in Control under paragraphs 2.3.1, 2.3.3 or 2.3.4 above.

2.3.7 By entering into this Agreement, the Executive irrevocably consents to the modification of the definition of “Change in Control” (including “change in control”) in all Employee Benefit Arrangements (as defined below), by substituting for such definition in each such Employee Benefit Arrangement the definition of “Change in Control” set forth above, with such substitution to be effective on the first date this Agreement has been signed by both the Company and the Executive. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “Employee Benefit Arrangement” shall mean each agreement with the Executive to which the Company or any Subsidiary is a party, and each plan or arrangement maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary, and including any awards outstanding under any such agreement, plan, or arrangement, to the extent that such award, agreement, plan, or arrangement contains a definition of “Change in Control.” However, to the extent that the Employee Benefit Arrangement provides for an award based on common stock of the Company (including, without limitation, an award of stock options or shares of restricted stock), and such Employee Benefit Arrangement provides that vesting or exercisability of such award will occur at the time of the Change in Control (rather than the occurrence of a subsequent event, such as termination of employment), the definition of “Change in Control” that is substituted for the definition in such Employee Benefit Arrangement shall be the definition of “Change in Control” set forth above, except that Section 2.3.4 shall be modified by adding, at the end of such Section, immediately prior to the word “or,” the following: “provided, however, that the Change in Control shall occur three (3) business days before such tender offer is to terminate, unless the offer is withdrawn first, if the Person making the offer could own, by the terms of the offer plus any shares beneficially owned by that Person, stock with 50% or more of the combined voting power of the then Outstanding Company Voting Securities when the offer (and any subsequent offering period) terminates;”

2.3.8 By entering into this Agreement, the Executive irrevocably consents to the amendment of the Nicor Inc. Stock Deferral Plan to provide for distribution, as soon as practicable following a Change in Control, of any amounts which may then be deferred for the Executive under such plan.

2.4 “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

2.5 “Employment Period” means the period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on the two-year anniversary of that date.

2.6 “Incentive Plan” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.2.

2.7 “Notice of Termination” means a written notice given in accordance with Section 11.8 which sets forth (a) the specific termination provision in this Agreement relied upon by the party giving such notice, (b) in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for termination of the Executive’s employment under such termination provision, and (c) if the Termination Date is other than the date of receipt of such Notice of Termination, the Termination Date.

2.8 “Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.3.

2.9 A “Potential Change in Control” shall exist during any period in which the circumstances described in Sections 2.9.1, 2.9.2, or 2.9.3 exist (provided, however, that a Potential Change in Control shall cease to exist not later than the occurrence of a Change in Control):

2.9.1 The Company enters into an agreement, the consummation of which would result in the occurrence of a Change in Control, provided that a Potential Change in Control described in this Section 2.9.1 shall cease to exist upon the expiration or other termination of all such agreements.

2.9.2 Any person (including the Company) publicly announces an intention to take or to consider taking actions the consummation of which would constitute a Change in Control; provided that a Potential Change in Control described in this Section 2.9.2 shall cease to exist upon the withdrawal of such intention, or upon a reasonable determination by the Board that there is no reasonable chance that such actions would be consummated.

2.9.3 The Board adopts a resolution to the effect that, for purposes of this Agreement, a Potential Change in Control exists; provided that a Potential Change in Control described in this Section 2.9.3 shall cease to exist upon a reasonable determination by the Board that the reasons that gave rise to the resolution providing for the existence of a Potential Change in Control have expired or no longer exist.

2.10 “Severance Incentive” means the greater of (i) the target annual incentive under an Incentive Plan applicable to the Executive for the Performance Period in which the Termination Date occurs, or (ii) the average of the actual annual incentives paid (or payable, to the extent not previously paid) to the Executive under the applicable Incentive Plan for each of the two calendar years preceding the calendar year in which the Termination Date occurs.

2.11 “Severance Period” means the period beginning on the Executive’s Termination Date and ending on the second anniversary thereof; provided, however, that no Severance Period will occur unless the Executive’s Termination Date occurs under circumstances described in Section 5.1 (relating to termination by the Executive for Good Reason or by the Company and Nicor Gas other than for Cause or Permanent Disability).

2.12 “Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, partnership, joint venture or other entity during any period in which at least a fifty percent interest in such entity is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company (or a successor to the Company).

2.13 “Termination Date” means the first day on or after which the Executive is not employed by the Company or Nicor Gas; provided, however, that (a) if the Company and Nicor Gas terminate the Executive’s employment other than for Cause or Disability (as defined in Section 4.1.2), then the Termination Date shall be the date of receipt of the Notice of Termination and (b) if the Executive’s employment is terminated by reason of death or Disability, then the Termination Date shall be the date of death of the Executive or the Disability Effective Date (as defined in Section 4.1.1), as the case may be.

2.14 “Welfare Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.4.

ARTICLE III
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT

3.1 Position and Duties.

3.1.1 The Company hereby agrees to cause the Company and/or Nicor Gas to continue the Executive’s employment during the Employment Period and, subject to Article IV of this Agreement, the Executive agrees to remain in the employ of the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, subject to the terms and conditions hereof. During the Employment Period, (i) the Executive’s position (including status, offices, titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties and responsibilities shall be at least commensurate in all material respects with the most significant of those held, exercised and assigned to the Executive at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date, and (ii) the Executive’s services shall be performed at the location where the Executive was employed immediately preceding the Effective Date or any office or location less than 25 miles from such location.

3.1.2 During the Employment Period, and excluding any periods of vacation and sick leave to which the Executive is entitled, the Executive agrees to devote reasonable attention and time during normal business hours to the business and affairs of the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, and, to the extent necessary to discharge the responsibilities assigned to the Executive hereunder, to use the Executive’s reasonable best efforts to perform faithfully and efficiently such responsibilities. During the Employment Period it shall not be a violation of this Agreement for the Executive (i) to serve on corporate, civic or charitable boards or committees, (ii) to deliver lectures, fulfill speaking engagements or teach at educational institutions and (iii) to manage personal investments, to the extent that such other activities do not, in the reasonable judgment of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “CEO”), inhibit or prohibit the performance of the Executive’s duties under this Agreement, or conflict in any material way with the business of the Company or any Subsidiary; provided, however, that the Executive shall not serve on the board of any business, or hold any other position with any business, without the consent of the CEO.

3.2 Compensation.

3.2.1 Base Salary. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall receive an annual base salary (“Annual Base Salary”), which shall be paid at an annual rate at least equal to twelve times the highest monthly base salary paid or payable, including any base salary which has been earned but deferred, to the Executive by the Company in respect of the twelve-month period immediately preceding the month in which the Effective Date occurs. During the Employment Period, the Annual Base Salary shall be reviewed no more than twelve months after the last salary increase awarded to the Executive prior to the Effective Date and, thereafter, at least annually, and shall be increased at any time and from time to time as shall be substantially consistent with increases in base salary awarded to other senior executives of the Company. Annual Base Salary shall not be reduced after any such increase unless such reduction is part of a policy, program or arrangement applicable to senior executives of the Company and of any successor entity, and the term Annual Base Salary as used in this Agreement shall refer to Annual Base Salary as so increased. Any increase in Annual Base Salary shall not limit or reduce any other obligation of the Company to the Executive under this Agreement.

3.2.2 Annual Incentive. In addition to Annual Base Salary, the Company shall pay or cause to be paid to the Executive an incentive award (the “Annual Incentive”) for each Performance Period or portion thereof which falls within the Employment Period. “Performance Period” means each period of time designated in accordance with any annual incentive award arrangement (“Incentive Plan”) which is based upon performance and approved by the Board or any committee of the Board, or in the absence of any Incentive Plan or any such designated period of time, Performance Period shall mean each calendar year. The Executive’s target and maximum Annual Incentive with respect to any Performance Period shall not be less than the target and maximum annual incentive award payable with respect to the Executive under the Company’s annual incentive program as in effect immediately preceding the Effective Date.

3.2.3 Incentive, Savings and Retirement Plans. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to participate in all incentive, savings and retirement plans, practices, policies and programs (“Plans”) applicable generally to other senior executives of the Company, but in no event shall such Plans provide the Executive with incentive opportunities (measured with respect to long-term and special incentives, to the extent, if any, that such distinctions are applicable) or savings and retirement benefits which are less favorable, in the aggregate, than the greater of (i) those provided by the Company for the Executive under such Plans as in effect at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date, or (ii) those provided generally at any time after the Effective Date to other senior executives of the Company.

3.2.4 Welfare Benefit Plans. During the Employment Period, the Executive and/or the Executive’s family, as the case may be, shall be eligible for participation in and shall receive all benefits under welfare benefit plans, practices, policies and programs (Welfare Plans”) provided by the Company (including, without limitation, medical, prescription, dental, disability, salary continuance, employee life, group life, accidental death and travel accident insurance benefits), but in no event shall such Welfare Plans provide the Executive with benefits which are less favorable, in the aggregate, than the greater of (i) those provided by the Company for the Executive under such Welfare Plans as were in effect at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date, or (ii) those provided generally at any time after the Effective Date to other senior executives of the Company.

3.2.5 Other Employee Benefits. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to other employee benefits and perquisites in accordance with the most favorable plans, practices, programs and policies of the Company, as in effect with respect to the Executive at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date, or if more favorable, as in effect generally with respect to other senior executives of the Company.

3.2.6 Expenses. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to receive prompt reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred by the Executive in accordance with the policies, practices and procedures of the Company as in effect with respect to the Executive at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date, or if more favorable, as in effect generally with respect to other senior executives of the Company.

3.2.7 Office and Support Staff. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to an office or offices of a size and with furnishings and other appointments, and to exclusive personal secretarial and other assistance, as in effect with respect to the Executive at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date, or if more favorable, as provided generally with respect to other senior executives of the Company.

3.2.8 Paid Time Off. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to paid time off in accordance with the plans, policies, programs and practices of the Company as in effect with respect to the Executive at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date, or if more favorable, as provided generally with respect to other senior executives of the Company.

3.2.9 Subsidiaries. To the extent that immediately prior to the Effective Date, the Executive has been on the payroll of, and participated in the incentive or employee benefit plans of, a Subsidiary of the Company, the references to the Company contained in Sections 3.2.1 through 3.2.8 and the other sections of this Agreement referring to benefits to which the Executive may be entitled shall be read to refer to such Subsidiary.


ARTICLE IV
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT

4.1 Disability.

4.1.1 During the Agreement Term, the Company and Nicor Gas may terminate the Executive’s employment upon the Executive’s Permanent Disability (as defined in Section 4.1.2) by giving the Executive or his legal representative, as applicable, (1) written notice in accordance with Section 11.8 of the Company’s or Nicor Gas’, as applicable, intention to terminate the Executive’s employment pursuant to this section, and (2) a certification of the Executive’s Permanent Disability by a physician selected by the Company or Nicor Gas or its insurers and reasonably acceptable to the Executive or the Executive’s legal representative. The Executive’s employment shall terminate effective on the 30th day (the “Permanent Disability Effective Date”) after the Executive’s receipt of such notice unless, before the Permanent Disability Effective Date, the Executive shall have resumed the full-time performance of the Executive’s duties. During the period in which the Executive has a Disability, the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, may appoint a temporary replacement to assume the Executive’s responsibilities.

4.1.2 The Executive shall be considered to have a “Permanent Disability” during any period in which he has a Disability (as defined below); provided, however, that the Executive shall not be considered to have “Permanent Disability” until (i) for a period of 180 consecutive days, the Executive, as a result of a Disability, is incapable, after reasonable accommodation, of performing his duties under this Agreement on a full-time basis; (ii) such Disability is reasonably expected to continue for at least another 90 days; and (iii) at the Executive’s Termination Date, he is eligible for income replacement benefits under the Company’s or Nicor Gas’ long-term disability plan. The Executive shall be considered to have a “Disability” during any period in which he has a physical or mental disability which renders him incapable, after reasonable accommodation, of performing his duties under this Agreement.

4.2 Death. The Executive’s employment shall terminate automatically upon the Executive’s death during the Agreement Term.

4.3 Cause. The Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, may terminate the Executive’s employment during the Employment Period for Cause. For purposes of this Agreement, “Cause” means:

4.3.1 the Executive’s willful commission of acts or omissions which have, have had, or are likely to have a material adverse effect on the business, operations, financial condition or reputation of the Company or Nicor Gas;

4.3.2 the Executive’s conviction (including a plea of guilty or nolo contendere) of a felony or any crime of fraud, theft, dishonesty or moral turpitude; or

4.3.3 the Executive’s material violation of any statutory or common law duty of loyalty to the Company or Nicor Gas.

For purposes of this Agreement, no act, or failure to act, on the part of the Executive shall be considered “willful” unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by the Executive in bad faith or without reasonable belief that the Executive’s action or omission was in the best interests of the Company or Nicor Gas. Any act, or failure to act, pursuant to direction provided by the person to whom the Executive reports, or provided by a resolution duly adopted by the Board, or pursuant to advice of counsel for the Company or Nicor Gas, shall be conclusively presumed to be done, or omitted to be done, by the Executive in good faith and in the best interests of the Company or Nicor Gas.

4.4 Good Reason. During the Employment Period, the Executive’s employment may be terminated by the Executive for Good Reason. For purposes of this Agreement, “Good Reason” means any material breach of this Agreement by the Company or Nicor Gas, including:

4.4.1 the failure to maintain the Executive in the office or position, or in a substantially equivalent office or position, held by the Executive immediately prior to the Change in Control;

4.4.2 a material adverse alteration in the nature or scope of the Executive’s position, duties, functions, responsibilities or authority;

4.4.3 a material reduction of the Executive’s salary, incentive compensation or benefits;

4.4.4 the failure of any successor to the Company to assume this Agreement, or a material breach of the Agreement by the Company or its successor;

4.4.5 a relocation of more than 25 miles of (i) the Executive’s principal workplace, or (ii) the principal offices of the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, (if such offices are the Executive’s principal workplace), in each case without the consent of the Executive;

4.4.6 the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, requiring the Executive to engage in travel that is materially greater than the Executive’s travel obligations during the one-year period immediately prior to the Change in Control; or

4.4.7 any failure by the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, to comply with any of the provisions of Section 3.2 of this Agreement, other than an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent failure not occurring in bad faith and which is remedied by the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the Executive;

provided, however, that an act or omission of the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, shall not constitute Good Reason: (i) unless the Executive gives the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, written notice of such act or omission and the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, fails to cure such act or omission within the 30-day period after such notice, or (ii) if the Executive first acquired knowledge of such act or omission more than 6 months before the Executive gives the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, such notice, or (iii) if the Executive has consented in writing to such act or omission in a document that makes specific reference to this Section 4.4.

4.5 Without Cause During a Potential Change in Control. If the Executive’s employment is terminated by the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, without Cause during a Potential Change in Control, and such date of termination occurs not more than 180 days prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control and the Executive establishes by reasonable evidence that such termination of employment was materially connected with and in anticipation of the Change in Control, then the Executive shall be entitled to receive the benefits that would have been provided under Section 5.1, determined as though:

4.5.1 the Executive were rehired by the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, immediately prior to the Change in Control at the salary rate equal to the Executive’s highest salary rate during the one-year period prior to the date of the Change in Control, and with other Company and Nicor Gas compensation and benefit arrangements comparable to those provided to comparable executives of the Company and Nicor Gas;

4.5.2 the Executive’s employment were terminated by the Company and Nicor Gas without Cause immediately after the Change in Control; and

4.5.3 this Agreement were in full force and effect at the time of the Change in Control, and at the time of the Executive’s deemed termination of employment.

4.6 Right of Resignation and Termination. This Agreement does not constitute a guarantee of continued employment at any time, but instead provides for certain rights and benefits for the Executive during his employment following the occurrence of a Change in Control, and in the event his employment with the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, terminates under the circumstances described herein. The Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, may terminate the employment of the Executive at any time for any reason, without breach of this Agreement, subject to its obligations set forth in Article V and elsewhere in this Agreement. The Executive may resign from the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, for Good Reason, or for any other reason, without breach of this Agreement, subject to the Executive’s obligations set forth in this Agreement; provided that, in the event of a resignation without Good Reason, the Executive shall provide at least four weeks advance notice of such resignation to the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable.. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions in this Section 4.6, the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, may suspend the Executive from performing his duties under this Agreement following the delivery of a Notice of Termination by the Executive without Good Reason; provided, however, that during the period of suspension (which shall end on the Termination Date), the Executive shall continue to be treated as employed by the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, for other purposes, and his rights to compensation or benefits shall not be reduced by reason of the suspension.

ARTICLE V
OBLIGATIONS OF THE COMPANY UPON TERMINATION

5.1 If by the Executive for Good Reason or by the Company and Nicor Gas, as Applicable, Other Than for Cause or Permanent Disability. If, during the Employment Period, the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, shall terminate the Executive’s employment other than for Cause or Permanent Disability, or if the Executive shall terminate employment for Good Reason, the Company’s and Nicor Gas’ obligations to the Executive shall be as set forth in this Section 5.1. As a precondition to fulfilling such obligations, the Company shall require the Executive to execute and deliver a release prepared by the Company and providing for the Executive’s release of any and all claims against the Company and its Subsidiaries (and those acting on behalf of them) that may have arisen on or before the date of the release, which release shall contain such other reasonable and customary terms as are specified by the Company. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section to the contrary, to the extent any portion of such release is subject to the seven-day revocation period prescribed by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended, or to any similar revocation period in effect on the Termination Date, no payment shall be due under this Section 5.1 until such revocation period has expired without such revocation occurring.

5.1.1 The Company shall, within five business days of such termination of employment, pay the Executive a cash payment equal to the sum of the following amounts:

5.1.1.1 to the extent not previously paid, the Annual Base Salary and any accrued paid time off through the Termination Date;

5.1.1.2 an amount equal to the product of (i) the Annual Incentive (as defined in Section 3.2.2) at target for any Performance Period in which the Termination Date occurs multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days the Executive was actually employed by the Company during such Performance Period, and the denominator of which is the number of days in the Performance Period; or, if greater, the amount of any Annual Incentive otherwise payable to the Executive with respect to a Performance Period in which the Termination Date occurs, which payment shall be in full settlement of Annual Incentive amounts due with respect to any such Performance Period; and

5.1.1.3 all amounts previously deferred by or accrued to the benefit of the Executive under any nonqualified deferred compensation plan sponsored by the Company (including, without limitation, any vested amounts deferred under incentive plans), together with any accrued earnings thereon, and not yet paid by the Company; and

5.1.1.4 an amount equal to the product of (A) two (2) multiplied by (B) the sum of (i) the Executive’s Annual Base Salary, and (ii) the Severance Incentive.

5.1.2 For purposes of each of the Executive’s stock options granted under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), any successor plan, or otherwise, that is or becomes exercisable on the Termination Date, the Executive’s termination of employment shall be disregarded, and each such option shall continue to be exercisable as though the Executive’s employment had continued through the last day on which such option would be exercisable in the absence of such employment termination (such earlier date being referred to herein as the “Applicable Expiration Date”). This Section 5.1.2 shall be applicable notwithstanding any term of any plan, arrangement, or agreement providing for early expiration of the option because of the Executive’s termination of employment, except for an amendment adopted in accordance with Section 11.7 of this Agreement and that by its specific terms amends this Agreement.

5.1.3 On the Termination Date (i) the Executive shall become fully vested in, and may thereupon and until the Applicable Expiration Date of such stock incentive awards exercise in whole or in part, any and all stock incentive awards granted to the Executive under the LTIP, any successor plan or otherwise which have not become exercisable as of the Termination Date; (ii) all performance units previously awarded to the Executive shall become fully vested, and a prorated calculation of the target value of all such units shall be done as of the Termination Date and full payment of such prorated target value shall be made by the Company within 30 days after the Termination Date; and (iii) the Executive shall become fully vested at the prorated target level in any other cash incentive awards granted for the performance period in which the Termination Date occurs under the LTIP, a successor plan or otherwise which have not, as of the Termination Date, become fully vested.

5.1.4 All forfeiture conditions that as of the Termination Date are applicable to any deferred stock unit, restricted stock or restricted share units awarded to the Executive by the Company pursuant to the LTIP, a successor plan or otherwise shall lapse immediately (to the extent such awards are outstanding immediately prior to the Termination Date).

5.1.5 During the Severance Period (or until such later date as any Welfare Plan of the Company may specify), the Company shall continue to provide to the Executive and the Executive’s family welfare benefits (including, without limitation, medical, prescription, dental, disability, individual life and group life insurance benefits) which are at least as favorable as those provided under the most favorable Welfare Plans of the Company applicable (i) with respect to the Executive and his family during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Termination Date, or (ii) with respect to other senior executives and their families during the Severance Period. In determining benefits under such Welfare Plans, the Executive’s annual compensation attributable to base salary and incentives for any plan year or calendar year, as applicable, shall be deemed to be not less than the Executive’s Annual Base Salary and Target Annual Incentive. The cost of the welfare benefits provided under this Section 5.1.5 shall not exceed the cost of such benefits to the Executive immediately before the Termination Date or, if less, the Effective Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Executive obtains comparable coverage under any Welfare Plans sponsored by another employer, then the amount of coverage required to be provided by the Company hereunder shall be reduced by the amount of coverage provided by such other employer’s Welfare Plans. The Executive’s rights under this Section shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any post-termination continuation coverage or conversion rights the Executive may have pursuant to applicable law, including, without limitation, continuation coverage required by Section  4980B of the Code. For purposes of determining eligibility for (but not the time of commencement of) retiree benefits under any Welfare Plans of the Company, the Executive shall be considered (i) to have remained employed until the last day of the Severance Period and to have retired on the last day of such period, and (ii) to have attained the age the Executive would have attained on the last day of the Severance Period.

5.1.6 If the Executive participates in the Company’s nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”), the amount payable under subsection 5.1.1.4 of this Agreement shall be taken into account for purposes of determining the amount of benefits to which the Executive is entitled under the SERP; provided that such amount shall be taken into account as though it was earned equally over the Severance Period, and further provided that the Executive shall be deemed to have attained the age he or she would have attained as of the last day of the Severance Period, and completed the number of years of service he or she would have completed as of the last day of the Severance Period. The Severance Period shall be taken into account for purposes of determining the amount of and eligibility to begin to receive benefits under the SERP. If the Executive participates in the Company's nonqualified Supplemental Senior Officer Retirement Plan ("SSORP"), on the Termination Date (i) the Executive shall become fully vested in all contributions (and in any earnings applied to such contributions) made by the Company on behalf of the Executive under the SSORP or any successor plan, if applicable, and (ii) the Company shall immediately make an additional contribution to the SSORP of an amount equal to the product of (x) the Annual Deferral Percentage (as defined in the SSORP) used for the most recently completed SSORP Plan Year, times (y) the amount payable under subsection 5.1.1.4 of this Agreement.

5.1.7 On the Termination Date (i) the Executive shall become fully vested in all contributions made by the Company on behalf of the Executive under the Company’s Savings Investment Plan (the “SIP”) or any supplemental or successor plan, if applicable, and (ii) the Company shall immediately make an additional contribution to the SIP (or, if such contribution is not permitted under the terms of the SIP, to a non-qualified plan providing benefits comparable to the benefits provided under the SIP) or any supplemental or successor plan, if applicable, equal to the aggregate maximum matching contributions which the Company would have made on behalf of the Executive to the SIP or any supplemental or successor plan, if applicable, for the Severance Period, calculated as if the amount payable under subsection 5.1.1.4 of this Agreement had been earned equally over the Severance Period and the Executive had made the maximum allowable voluntary contributions to the SIP or any supplemental or successor plan, if applicable. In addition, if the Executive is not eligible to participate in the Company’s defined benefit retirement plan, the Company shall also contribute to the SIP or any supplemental or successor plan, if applicable, on the Termination Date an amount equal to the aggregate additional “retirement growth” contributions which the Company would have made on behalf of the Executive for the Severance Period if the amount payable under subsection 5.1.1.4 of this Agreement had been earned equally over the Severance Period.

5.1.8 The Company shall, at its sole expense, as incurred, pay on behalf of Executive all fees and costs charged by a nationally recognized outplacement firm selected by the Company (subject to approval by the Executive, which shall not be withheld unreasonably) to provide outplacement service.

5.2 If by the Company and Nicor Gas for Cause. If the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, terminates the Executive’s employment for Cause during the Employment Period, this Agreement shall terminate without further obligation by the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, to the Executive, other than the obligation immediately to pay the Executive in cash the Executive’s Annual Base Salary through the Termination Date, plus any accrued paid time off, in each case to the extent not previously paid.

5.3 If by the Executive Other Than for Good Reason. If the Executive terminates employment during the Employment Period other than for Good Reason (including, but not by way of limitation, voluntary retirement other than for Good Reason), and other than for Disability or death, this Agreement shall terminate without further obligation by the Executive or by the Company, other than the obligation of the Company immediately to pay the Executive in cash the Executive’s Annual Base Salary through the Termination Date, plus any accrued paid time off, in each case to the extent not previously paid.

5.4 If by the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, for Permanent Disability. If the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, and Nicor Gas, as applicable, terminates the Executive’s employment by reason of the Executive’s Permanent Disability during the Employment Period, this Agreement shall terminate without further obligation to the Executive, other than:

5.4.1 the Company’s obligation immediately to pay the Executive in cash all amounts specified in Sections 5.1.1.1, 5.1.1.2 and 5.1.1.3, in each case, to the extent unpaid as of the Termination Date (such amounts collectively, the “Accrued Obligations”), and

5.4.2 the Executive’s right after the Permanent Disability Effective Date to receive disability and other benefits at least equal to the greater of (i) those provided under the most favorable disability Plans applicable to disabled senior executives of the Company in effect immediately before the Termination Date, or (ii) those provided under the most favorable disability Plans of the Company in effect at any time during the 90-day period immediately before the Effective Date.

5.5 If upon Death. If the Executive’s employment is terminated by reason of the Executive’s death during the Employment Period, this Agreement shall terminate without further obligation to the Executive’s legal representatives under this Agreement, other than the obligation immediately to pay the Executive’s estate or beneficiary in cash all Accrued Obligations. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the Executive’s family shall be entitled to receive benefits at least equal to the most favorable benefits provided under Plans of the Company to the surviving families of senior executives of the Company, but in no event shall such Plans provide benefits which in each case are less favorable, in the aggregate, than the most favorable of those provided by the Company to the Executive under such Plans in effect at any time during the 90-day period immediately before the Effective Date.

ARTICLE VI
CERTAIN ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS BY THE COMPANY

6.1 Gross-up for Certain Taxes.

6.1.1 If it is determined by the Company’s independent auditors that any benefit received or deemed received by the Executive from the Company pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise, whether or not in connection with a Change in Control (such monetary or other benefits collectively, the “Potential Parachute Payments”) is or will become subject to any excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or any similar tax payable under any United States federal, state, local or other law (such excise tax and all such similar taxes collectively, “Excise Taxes”), then the Company shall, subject to Sections 6.6 and 6.7, within five business days after such determination, pay the Executive an amount (the “Gross-up Payment”) equal to the product of:

(a) the amount of such Excise Taxes multiplied by
 
(b) the Gross-up Multiple (as defined in Section 6.4). The Gross-up Payment is intended to compensate the Executive for all Excise Taxes payable by the Executive with respect to the Potential Parachute Payments and any federal, state, local or other income or other taxes or Excise Taxes payable by the Executive with respect to the Gross-up Payment.
 
6.1.2 The determination of the Company’s independent auditors described in Section 6.1.1, including the detailed calculations of the amounts of the Potential Parachute Payments, Excise Taxes and Gross-Up Payment and the assumptions relating thereto, shall be set forth in a written certificate of such auditors (the “Company Certificate”) delivered to the Executive. The Executive or the Company may at any time request the preparation and delivery to the Executive of a Company Certificate. The Company shall cause the Company Certificate to be delivered to the Executive as soon as reasonably possible after such request.

6.2 Determination by the Executive.

6.2.1 If (i) the Company shall fail to deliver a Company Certificate to the Executive within 30 days after its receipt of his written request therefor, or (ii) at any time after the Executive’s receipt of a Company Certificate, the Executive disputes either (x) the amount of the Gross-Up Payment set forth therein, or (y) the determination set forth therein to the effect that no Gross-Up Payment is due (whether by reason of Section 6.7 or otherwise), then the Executive may elect to require the Company to pay a Gross-Up Payment in the amount determined by the Executive as set forth in an Executive Counsel Opinion (as defined in Section 6.5). Any such demand by the Executive shall be made by delivery to the Company of a written notice which specifies the Gross-Up Payment determined by the Executive (together with the detailed calculations of the amounts of Potential Parachute Payments, Excise Taxes and Gross-Up Payment and the assumptions relating thereto) and an Executive Counsel Opinion regarding such Gross-Up Payment (such written notice and opinion collectively, the “Executive’s Determination”). Within 30 days after delivery of an Executive’s Determination to the Company, the Company shall either (i) pay the Executive the Gross-Up Payment set forth in Executive’s Determination (less the portion thereof, if any, previously paid to Executive by the Company) or (ii) deliver to the Executive a Company Certificate and a Company Counsel Opinion (as defined in Section 6.5), and pay the Executive the Gross-Up Payment specified in such Company Certificate. If for any reason the Company fails to comply with the preceding sentence, the Gross-Up Payment specified in the Executive’s Determination shall be controlling for all purposes.

6.2.2 If the Executive does not request a Company Certificate, and the Company does not deliver a Company Certificate to the Executive, then (i) the Company shall, for purposes of Section 6.7, be deemed to have determined that no Gross-up Payment is due, and (ii) the Executive shall not pay any Excise Taxes in respect of Potential Parachute Payments, except in accordance with Sections 6.6.1 or 6.6.4.

6.3 Additional Gross-up Amounts. If for any reason it is later determined (whether pursuant to the subsequently-enacted provisions of the Code, final regulations or published rulings of the IRS, a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, a determination of the Company’s independent auditors set forth in a Company Certificate or, subject to the last two sentences of Section 6.2.1, an Executive’s Determination) that the amount of Excise Taxes payable by the Executive is greater than the amount determined by the Company or the Executive pursuant to Section 6.1 or 6.2, as applicable, then the Company shall, subject to Sections 6.6 and 6.7, pay the Executive an amount (which shall also be deemed a Gross-up Payment) equal to the product of:
 
(a) the sum of (1) such additional Excise Taxes and (2) any interest, fines, penalties, expenses or other costs incurred by the Executive as a result of having taken a position in accordance with determination made pursuant to Section 6.1 or 6.2, as applicable,
 
multiplied by

(b) the Gross-up Multiple.

6.4 Gross-up Multiple. The Gross-up Multiple shall equal a fraction, the numerator of which is one (1.0), and the denominator of which is one (1.0) minus the lesser of (i) the sum, expressed as a decimal fraction, of the effective marginal tax rates of all federal, state, local and other income and other taxes and any Excise Taxes applicable to the Gross-up Payment; or (ii) 0.80, it being intended that the Gross-up Multiple shall in no event exceed five (5.0). (If different rates of tax are applicable to various portions of a Gross-up Payment, the weighted average of such rates shall be used.)

6.5 Opinion of Counsel. “Executive Counsel Opinion” means an opinion of nationally-recognized executive compensation counsel to the effect (i) that the amount of the Gross-Up Payment determined by the Executive pursuant to Section 6.2 is the amount that a court of competent jurisdiction, based on a final judgment not subject to further appeal, is most likely to decide to have been calculated in accordance with this Article and applicable law and (ii) if the Company has previously delivered a Company Certificate to the Executive, that there is no reasonable basis or no substantial authority for the calculation of the Gross-Up Payment set forth in the Company Certificate. “Company Counsel Opinion” means an opinion of nationally-recognized executive compensation counsel to the effect that (i) the amount of the Gross-Up Payment set forth in the Company Certificate is the amount that a court of competent jurisdiction, based on a final judgment not subject to further appeal, is most likely to decide to have been calculated in accordance with this Article and applicable law and (ii) for purposes of Section 6662 of the Code, the Executive has substantial authority to report on his federal income tax return the amount of Excise Taxes set forth in the Company Certificate.

6.6 Amount Increased or Contested.

6.6.1 The Executive shall notify the Company in writing (an “Executive’s Notice”) of any claim by the IRS or other taxing authority (an “IRS Claim”) that, if successful, would require the payment by the Executive of Excise Taxes in respect of Potential Parachute Payments in an amount in excess of the amount of such Excise Taxes determined in accordance with Section 6.1 or 6.2, as applicable. Such Executive’s Notice shall include the nature and amount of such IRS Claim, the date on which such IRS Claim is due to be paid (the “IRS Claim Deadline”), and a copy of all notices and other documents or correspondence received by the Executive in respect of such IRS Claim. The Executive shall give the Executive’s Notice as soon as practicable, but no later than the earlier of (i) 10 business days after the Executive first obtains actual knowledge of such IRS Claim or (ii) five business days before the IRS Claim Deadline; provided, however, that the Executive’s failure to give such notice shall affect the Company’s obligations under this Article only to the extent that the Company is actually prejudiced by such failure. If at least one business day before the IRS Claim Deadline the Company shall:

6.6.1.1 deliver to the Executive a Company Certificate to the effect that the IRS Claim has been reviewed by the Company’s independent auditors and, notwithstanding the IRS Claim, the amount of Excise Taxes, interest and penalties payable by the Executive is either zero or an amount less than the amount specified in the IRS Claim,

6.6.1.2 pay to the Executive an amount (which shall also be deemed a Gross-Up Payment) equal to the positive difference between (x) the product of the amount of Excise Taxes, interest and penalties specified in the Company Certificate, if any, multiplied by the Gross-Up Multiple, and (y) the portion of such product, if any, previously paid to the Executive by the Company, and

6.6.1.3 direct the Executive pursuant to Section 6.6.4 to contest the balance of the IRS Claim, then the Executive shall pay only the amount, if any, of Excise Taxes, interest and penalties specified in the Company Certificate. In no event shall the Executive pay an IRS Claim earlier than 30 days after having given an Executive’s Notice to the Company (or, if sooner, the IRS Claim Deadline).

6.6.2 At any time after the payment by the Executive of any amount of Excise Taxes or related interest or penalties in respect of Potential Parachute Payments (whether or not such amount was based upon a Company Certificate or an Executive’s Determination), the Company may in its discretion require the Executive to pursue a claim for a refund (“Refund Claim”) of all or any portion of such Excise Taxes, interest or penalties as the Company may specify by written notice to the Executive.

6.6.3 If the Company notifies the Executive in writing that the Company desires the Executive to contest an IRS Claim or to pursue a Refund Claim, the Executive shall:

6.6.3.1 give the Company all information that it reasonably requests in writing from time to time relating to such IRS Claim or Refund Claim, as applicable,

6.6.3.2 take such action in connection with such IRS Claim or Refund Claim (as applicable) as the Company reasonably requests in writing from time to time, including accepting legal representation with respect thereto by an attorney selected by the Company, subject to the approval of the Executive (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed),

6.6.3.3 cooperate with the Company in good faith to contest such IRS Claim or pursue such Refund Claim, as applicable,

6.6.3.4 permit the Company to participate in any proceedings relating to such IRS Claim or Refund Claim, as applicable, and

6.6.3.5 contest such IRS Claim or prosecute such Refund Claim (as applicable) to a determination before any administrative tribunal, in a court of initial jurisdiction and in one or more appellate courts, as the Company may from time to time determine in its discretion.

The Company shall control all proceedings in connection with such IRS Claim or Refund Claim (as applicable) and in its discretion may cause the Executive to pursue or forego any and all administrative appeals, proceedings, hearings and conferences with the IRS or other taxing authority in respect of such IRS Claim or Refund Claim (as applicable); provided that (i) any extension of the statute of limitations relating to payment of taxes for the taxable year of the Executive relating to the IRS Claim is limited solely to such IRS Claim, (ii) the Company’s control of the IRS Claim or Refund Claim (as applicable) shall be limited to issues with respect to which a Gross-Up Payment would be payable, and (iii) the Executive shall be entitled to settle or contest, as the case may be, any other issue raised by the IRS or other taxing authority.

6.6.4 The Company may at any time in its discretion direct the Executive to (i) contest the IRS Claim in any lawful manner or (ii) pay the amount specified in an IRS Claim and pursue a Refund Claim; provided, however, that if the Company directs the Executive to pay an IRS Claim and pursue a Refund Claim, the Company shall advance the amount of such payment to the Executive on an interest-free basis and shall indemnify the Executive, on an after-tax basis, for any income or other applicable taxes or Excise Tax, and any related interest or penalties imposed with respect to such advance.

6.6.5 The Company shall pay directly all legal, accounting and other costs and expenses (including additional interest and penalties) incurred by the Company or the Executive in connection with any IRS Claim or Refund Claim, as applicable, and shall indemnify the Executive, on an after-tax basis, for any income or other applicable taxes, Excise Tax and related interest and penalties imposed on the Executive as a result of such payment of costs and expenses.

6.7 Refunds. If, after the receipt by the Executive of any payment or advance of Excise Taxes advanced by the Company pursuant to Section 6.6, the Executive receives any refund with respect to such claim, the Executive shall (subject to the Company’s complying with the requirements of Section 6.6) promptly pay the Company the amount of such refund (together with any interest paid or credited thereon after taxes applicable thereto). If, after the receipt by the Executive of an amount advanced by the Company pursuant to Section 6.6, a determination is made that the Executive shall not be entitled to any refund with respect to such claim and the Company does not notify the Executive in writing of its intent to contest such determination within 30 days after the Company receives written notice of such determination, then such advance shall be forgiven and shall not be required to be repaid and the amount of such advance shall offset, to the extent thereof, the amount of Gross-up Payment required to be paid. Any contest of a denial of refund shall be controlled by Section 6.6.

ARTICLE VII
EXPENSES AND INTEREST

7.1 Legal Fees and Other Expenses.

7.1.1 If the Executive incurs legal fees or other expenses in an effort to secure, preserve, establish entitlement to, or obtain benefits under this Agreement (including, without limitation, the fees and other expenses of the Executive’s legal counsel in connection with the delivery of the Executive Counsel opinion referred to in Section 6.5), the Company shall, regardless of the outcome of such effort, promptly reimburse the Executive on a current basis for such fees and expenses following the Executive’s written submission of a request for reimbursement together with evidence that such fees and expenses were incurred.

7.1.2 If the Executive does not prevail (after exhaustion of all available judicial remedies) in respect of a claim by the Executive or by the Company hereunder, and the Company establishes before a court of competent jurisdiction, by clear and convincing evidence, that the Executive had no reasonable basis for his claim hereunder, or for his response to the Company’s claim hereunder, and acted in bad faith, no further reimbursement for legal fees and expenses shall be due to the Executive in respect of such claim and the Executive shall refund any amounts previously reimbursed hereunder with respect to such claim.

7.2 Interest. If the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, does not pay any amount due to the Executive under this Agreement within three days after such amount became due and owing, interest shall accrue on such amount from the date it became due and owing until the date of payment at an annual rate equal to 200 basis points above the base commercial lending rate published in The Wall Street Journal in effect from time to time during the period of such nonpayment.

ARTICLE VIII
NO SET-OFF OR MITIGATION

8.1 No Set-off by Company. The Executive’s right to receive when due the payments and other benefits provided for under this Agreement is absolute, unconditional and subject to no set-off, counterclaim or legal or equitable defense. Any claim which the Company may have against the Executive, whether for a breach of this Agreement or otherwise, shall be brought in a separate action or proceeding and not as part of any action or proceeding brought by the Executive to enforce any rights against the Company under this Agreement.

8.2 No Mitigation. The Executive shall not have any duty to mitigate the amounts payable by the Company and Nicor Gas, as applicable, under this Agreement by seeking new employment following termination. Except as specifically otherwise provided in this Agreement, all amounts payable pursuant to this Agreement shall be paid without reduction regardless of any amounts of salary, compensation or other amounts which may be paid or payable to the Executive as the result of the Executive’s employment by another employer.

ARTICLE IX
NON-EXCLUSIVITY OF RIGHTS

9.1 Waiver of Other Severance Rights. Except as may be otherwise specifically provided in an amendment of this Section 9.1 adopted in accordance with Section 11.7 of this Agreement, the Executive’s rights under Section 5.1 of this Agreement shall be in lieu of any benefits that may be otherwise payable to or on behalf of the Executive pursuant to the terms of any severance pay arrangement of the Company or any Subsidiary or any other, similar arrangement of the Company or any Subsidiary providing benefits upon involuntary termination of employment and shall also be in lieu of any benefits under the Nicor Inc. Executive/Key Employee Severance Benefits Program (notwithstanding any provision of that program to the contrary); provided, however, that this Section 9.1 shall not affect the Executive’s rights to receive any benefits with respect to a termination of employment that occurs outside of the Employment Period.

9.2 Other Rights. Except as provided in Section 9.1, this Agreement shall not prevent or limit the Executive’s continuing or future participation in any benefit, bonus, incentive or other plans provided by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and for which the Executive may qualify, nor shall this Agreement limit or otherwise affect such rights as the Executive may have under any other agreements with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. Amounts which are vested benefits or which the Executive is otherwise entitled to receive under any plan of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and any other payment or benefit required by law at or after the Termination Date shall be payable in accordance with such Plan or applicable law except as expressly modified by this Agreement.

ARTICLE X
CONFIDENTIALITY

10.1 Confidentiality. The Executive acknowledges that it is the policy of the Company and its Subsidiaries to maintain as secret and confidential all valuable and unique information and techniques acquired, developed or used by the Company and its Subsidiaries relating to their business, operations, employees and customers, which gives the Company and its Subsidiaries a competitive advantage in the transmission, distribution, marketing, or sale of natural gas or in the energy services industry and other businesses in which the Company and its Subsidiaries are engaged (“Confidential Information”). The Executive recognizes that all such Confidential Information is the sole and exclusive property of the Company and its Subsidiaries, and that disclosure of Confidential Information would cause damage to the Company and its Subsidiaries. The Executive agrees that, except as required by the duties of his employment with the Company or its Subsidiaries and except in connection with enforcing the Executive’s rights under this Agreement or if compelled by a court or governmental agency, he will not, without the consent of the Company, disseminate or otherwise disclose any Confidential Information obtained during his employment with the Company or its Subsidiaries until such time as such information has been disclosed publicly by the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, or with its consent, or is otherwise a matter of public knowledge (unless the Executive has reason to know that such information became a matter of public knowledge through an unauthorized disclosure).

10.2 Remedy. The Executive and the Company specifically agree that, in the event that the Executive shall breach his obligations under this Article X, the Company and its Subsidiaries will suffer irreparable injury and shall be entitled to injunctive relief therefor, and shall not be precluded from pursuing any and all remedies it may have at law or in equity for breach of such obligations; provided, however, that such breach shall not in any manner or degree whatsoever limit, reduce or otherwise affect the obligations of the Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, under this Agreement, and in no event shall an asserted breach of the Executive’s obligations under this Article X constitute a basis for deferring or withholding any amounts otherwise payable to the Executive under this Agreement.

ARTICLE XI
MISCELLANEOUS

11.1 No Assignability. This Agreement is personal to the Executive and without the prior written consent of the Company shall not be assignable by the Executive otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Executive’s legal representatives.

11.2 Successors. Before or upon the consummation of any Change in Control, the Company shall obtain from each individual, group or entity, if any, that becomes a successor of the Company by reason of the Change in Control, the unconditional written agreement of such individual, group or entity to assume this Agreement and to perform all of the obligations of the Company hereunder.

11.3 Payments to Beneficiary. If the Executive dies before receiving amounts to which the Executive is entitled under this Agreement, such amounts shall be paid in a lump sum to the beneficiary designated in writing by the Executive, or if none is so designated, to the Executive’s estate.

11.4 Nonalienation of Benefits. Benefits payable under this Agreement shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, charge, garnishment, execution or levy of any kind, either voluntary or involuntary, before actually being received by the Executive, and any such attempt to dispose of any right to benefits payable under this Agreement shall be void.

11.5 Severability. If any one or more articles, sections or other portions of this Agreement are declared by any court or governmental authority to be unlawful or invalid, such unlawfulness or invalidity shall not serve to invalidate any article, section or other portion not so declared to be unlawful or invalid. Any article, section or other portion so declared to be unlawful or invalid shall be construed so as to effectuate the terms of such article, section or other portion to the fullest extent possible while remaining lawful and valid.

11.6 Arbitration. Any and all disputes between the parties hereto arising out of this Agreement (other than disputes related to Article VI or to an alleged breach of the covenant contained in Article X) shall be settled by arbitration before an impartial arbitrator pursuant to the rules and regulations of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) pertaining to the arbitration of commercial disputes. Either party may invoke the right to arbitration. The arbitrator shall be selected by means of the parties striking alternatively from a panel of seven arbitrators supplied by the Chicago office of AAA. The Arbitrator shall have the authority to interpret and apply the provisions of this Agreement, consistent with Section 11.10 below. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties. Judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction. The arbitrator’s fees and expenses shall be borne by the Company.

11.7 Amendments. This Agreement shall not be altered, amended or modified except by written instrument executed by the Company and the Executive.

11.8 Notices. All notices and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered by hand, by a nationally-recognized commercial delivery service, or by first-class registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

If to the Executive:

Gerald P. O’Connor
1300 East Gartner Road
Naperville, IL 60540

If to the Company:

Nicor Inc.
1844 Ferry Road
Naperville, Illinois 60563-9600
Attn: Claudia J. Colalillo

or to such other address as either party shall have furnished to the other in writing. Notice and communications shall be effective when actually received by the addressee.

11.9 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

11.10 Governing Law. This Agreement is intended to be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois, without regard to its choice of law principles.

11.11 Captions. The captions of this Agreement are not a part of the provisions hereof and shall have no force or effect.

11.12 Number and Gender. Wherever from the context it appears appropriate, each term stated in either the singular or plural shall include the singular and the plural, and pronouns stated in either the masculine, the feminine or the neuter gender shall include the masculine, feminine and neuter genders.

11.13 Tax Withholding. The Company or Nicor Gas, as applicable, may withhold from any amounts payable under this Agreement any federal, state or local taxes that are required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable law or regulation.

11.14 No Waiver. A waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any other provision, and any waiver of any default as to any such provision shall not be deemed a waiver of any later default as to that or any other provision.

11.15 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Company, Nicor Gas and the Executive with respect to its subject matter.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.






/s/ GERALD P. O’CONNOR
Gerald P. O’Connor


Nicor Inc.

By: /s/ THOMAS L. FISHER
Thomas L. Fisher
Chairman and CEO

EX-21.01 4 subsidiaries.htm EXHIBIT 21.01 - NICOR INC SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 21.01 - Nicor Inc Subsidiaries
Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 21.01
 

NICOR INC.
   
Subsidiary Listing
   
December 31, 2005
   
     
     
Subsidiary
 
Jurisdiction
Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company)
 
IL
Birdsall, Inc.
 
FL
EX-23.01 5 consentofaccountingfirm.htm EXHIBIT 23.01 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Exhibit 21.01 - Nicor Inc Subsidiaries
  Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 23.01


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-1732, 33-31029, 333-107377, 333-107375 and 333-28699 on Form S-8 of our report, dated February 24, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Nicor Inc. (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to a change, in 2005, in method of accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations as discussed in Note 2 and a change, in 2003, in method of accounting for energy trading activities and gas inventories as discussed in Note 1), and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 2006
EX-24.01 6 powersofattorney.htm EXHIBIT 24.01 - POWERS OF ATTORNEY Exhibit 24.01 - Powers of Attorney

Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 24.01


POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ ROBERT M. BEAVERS, JR.
Robert M. Beavers, Jr.



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ BRUCE P. BICKNER
Bruce P. Bickner



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ JOHN H. BIRDSALL, III
John H. Birdsall, III



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ THOMAS A. DONAHOE
Thomas A. Donahoe 



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ RAYMOND A. JEAN
Raymond A. Jean



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ JOHN E. JONES
John E. Jones 



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ DENNIS J. KELLER
Dennis J. Keller 



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ R. EDEN MARTIN
R. Eden Martin



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ GEORGIA R. NELSON
Georgia R. Nelson 



POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ WILLIAM A. OSBORN
William A. Osborn 




POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ JOHN RAU
John Rau 




POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned, a Director, Officer, or Director and Officer of Nicor Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company), Illinois corporations, hereby authorizes any officer of Nicor Inc. and each of them, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, Officer, or Director and Officer, the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. and Nicor Gas Company (and any amendments thereto) to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Date: January 19, 2006





/s/ JOHN F. RIORDAN
John F. Riordan 
































EX-31.01 7 exh31_1certification.htm EXHIBIT 31.01 CERTIFICATION Exhibit 31.01 Certification


Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Russ M. Strobel, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a signficant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date
February 24, 2006
 
/s/ RUSS M. STROBEL
 
   
Russ M. Strobel
     
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.02 8 exh31_2certification.htm EXHIBIT 31.02 CERTIFICATION Exhibit 31.02 Certification
Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Hawley, certify that:
 
1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc.;
 
2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date
February 24, 2006
 
/s/ RICHARD L. HAWLEY
     
Richard L. Hawley
     
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 
EX-32.01 9 exh32_1certification.htm EXHIBIT 32.01 CERTIFICATION Exhibit 32.01 Certification
Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nicor Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
February 24, 2006
 
/s/ RUSS M. STROBEL
     
Russ M. Strobel
     
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


EX-32.02 10 exh32_2certification.htm EXHIBIT 32.02 CERTIFICATION Exhibit 32.02 Certification
Nicor Inc.
Form 10-K
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nicor Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
February 24, 2006
 
/s/ RICHARD L. HAWLEY
     
Richard L. Hawley
     
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----