-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, J5vVJB+JUH8waBacIXmjNScY58INz3MxE29iqwj4098kOcT90wFvAePKZFeDI/F1 fLywbxu36i+Jz5i9492T6g== 0001144204-06-010014.txt : 20060315 0001144204-06-010014.hdr.sgml : 20060315 20060315152605 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001144204-06-010014 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 41 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20051231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20060315 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20060315 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CENTER BANCORP INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000712771 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: STATE COMMERCIAL BANKS [6022] IRS NUMBER: 521273725 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NJ FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-11486 FILM NUMBER: 06688084 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2455 MORRIS AVE CITY: UNION STATE: NJ ZIP: 07083 BUSINESS PHONE: 9086889500 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2455 MORRIS AVE CITY: UNION STATE: NJ ZIP: 07083 10-K 1 v03662510k.htm Unassociated Document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________
FORM 10-K
______________
(Mark One)
ý      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)          
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
OR
¨       TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from                      to                      
Commission File Number: 2-81353
______________
CENTER BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
______________
New Jersey
52-1273725
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
2455 Morris Avenue, Union, NJ 07083-0007
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
(908) 688-9500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common stock, no par value
(Title of class)
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ or No ý
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ or No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý or No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ý
Non-accelerated ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes ¨ or No ý
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold or the average bid and ask price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter – $141.0 million
Shares outstanding on February 28, 2006
Common stock, no par value: 13,436,038 shares
Documents Incorporated by reference
Definitive proxy statement dated March 18, 2006 in connection with the 2006 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A will be incorporated by reference in Part III. Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 is incorporated by reference in Part I and Part II





INDEX TO FORM 10-K
   
Page
     
PART I
 
 
Item 1
Business
1
Item 1A
Risk Factors
13
Item 1B
Unresolved Staff Comments
14
Item 2
Properties
15
Item 3
Legal Proceedings
15
Item 4
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 
15
Item 4A
Executive Officers
16
PART II
 
 
Item 5
Market Information for the Registrant’s Stock and Related
Stockholder Matters
17
Item 6
Selected Financial Data
17
Item 7
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
17
Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
17
Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
17
Item 9
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
17
Item 9A
Controls and Procedures
18
Item 9B
Other Information
20
PART III
 
 
Item 10
Directors of  Registrant
21
Item 11
Executive Compensation
21
Item 12
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management
21
Item 13
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
21
Item 14
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
21
PART IV
 
 
Item 15
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
22
SIGNATURES
25






CENTER BANCORP INC.
FORM 10-K
PART I
Item 1 - Business
A)  Historical Development of Business
This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Sections 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. This report contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of Center Bancorp including statements preceded by, followed by or that include words or phrases such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “trend,” “objective,” “continue,” “remain,” “pattern” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” “may” or similar expressions. There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to: (1) competitive pressures among depository institutions may increase significantly; (2) changes in the interest rate environment may reduce interest margins; (3) prepayment speeds, loan origination and sale volumes, charge-offs and loan loss provisions may vary substantially from period to period; (4) general economic conditions may be less favorable than expected; (5) political developments, wars or other hostilities may disrupt or increase volatility in securities markets or other economic conditions; (6) legislative or regulatory changes or actions may adversely affect the businesses in which Center Bancorp is engaged; (7) changes and trends in the securities markets may adversely impact Center Bancorp; (8) a delayed or incomplete resolution of regulatory issues could adversely impact our planning; (9) the impact on reputational risk created by the developments discussed above on such matters as business generation and retention, funding and liquidity could be significant; and (10) the outcome of regulatory and legal investigations and proceedings may not be anticipated. Further information on other factors that could affect the financial results of Center Bancorp are included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Center Bancorp’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents are available free of charge at the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov and/or from Center Bancorp.
Center Bancorp, Inc., a one-bank holding company, was incorporated in the state of New Jersey on November 12, 1982. Center Bancorp, Inc. commenced operations on May 1, 1983, upon the acquisition of all outstanding shares of The Union Center National Bank (the “Bank”). The holding company’s sole activity, at this time, is to act as a holding company for the Bank and its subsidiaries. As used herein, the term “Corporation” shall refer to Center Bancorp, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries and the term “Parent Corporation” shall refer to Center Bancorp, Inc. on an unconsolidated basis.
The Bank was organized in 1923 under the laws of the United States of America. The Bank operates five offices in Union Township, Union County, New Jersey, one office in Vauxhall, Union County, New Jersey, one office in Summit, Union County, New Jersey, one office in Springfield Township, Union County, New Jersey, one office in Berkeley Heights, Union County, New Jersey, one office in Madison, Morris County, New Jersey and three offices in Morristown, Morris County, New Jersey and employed 202 full-time equivalent persons at December 31, 2005. The Bank is a full service commercial bank offering a complete range of individual and commercial services.
During 2001 and 2003, the Corporation formed statutory business trusts, which exist for the exclusive purpose of (i) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of a trust; (ii) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of the Corporation; and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. These subordinated debentures and the related income effects are not eliminated in the consolidated financial statements as the statutory business trusts are not consolidated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) interpretation No.46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Distributions on the subordinated debentures owned by the subsidiary trusts have been classified as interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.


1


The Corporation issued $10.3 million in 2001 and $5.2 million in 2003 of subordinated debentures. These securities are included as a component of Tier 1 Capital for regulatory purposes. The Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 9.07 percent at December 31, 2005.
During 2002, the Bank established two investment subsidiaries to hold portions of its securities portfolio and in January of 2003, established an insurance subsidiary for the sale of insurance and annuity products.
On September 29, 2004 the Parent issued 888,888 shares of the Parent’s common stock to a limited number of accredited investors in a private placement of its securities. The shares were issued at a purchase price of $11.25 per share. Net proceeds to the Parent were approximately $9.4 million, after commissions and expenses
On June 30, 2005, the Corporation issued 1,904,761 shares of the holding company’s common stock to a limited number of accredited investors in a private placement of its securities. The shares were issued at a purchase price of $10.50 per share. Net proceeds to the holding company were approximately $18.9 million, after commissions and expenses.
The Corporation utilized the net proceeds from each offering for working capital purposes. In addition, Center Bancorp will also use such proceeds to increase capital levels, to fund branch expansion, for strategic acquisitions which could include non-bank financial services companies, for new hires to expand its commercial lending business and to make payments with respect to outstanding trust preferred securities.
The shares sold in the offerings were not initially registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The shares were restricted from being offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. Pursuant to the terms of agreements entered into with the investors, the Parent has registered the shares for resale by the investors.
The Corporation completed the acquisition of Red Oak Bank as of the close of business on May 20, 2005. Red Oak Bank was a State chartered commercial bank and operated one full service branch location in Hanover Township, Morris County, New Jersey. The acquisition presented the Corporation with the strategic opportunity to enhance shareholder value, market share and earnings growth. The opportunities include increasing the Corporation’s loan portfolio, strengthening and expanding the Corporation’s presence in the affluent and desirable business areas of the Morris County marketplace which compliments the Corporation’s existing footprint in that market through additional retail and commercial banking product offerings, increasing deposit share and further building the Corporation’s core deposit funding base, as well as enhancing the Corporation’s opportunities for earning asset generation.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, 50% of Red Oak Bank’s common stock was converted into Center Bancorp, Inc. common stock at an exchange rate of .9227 of the Corporation’s shares per each Red Oak Bank share and 50% was converted into $12.06 in cash for each Red Oak Bank share. The aggregate consideration paid in the merger consisted of $13.3 million in cash and 1,015,816 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The cash portion of the merger consideration was funded through the sale of securities available for sale and cash from continuing operations. The Corporation additionally converted remaining stock options covering 56,266 shares of Red Oak Bank common stock outstanding at the time of the merger and were exchanged for options covering 54,514 shares of Center Bancorp, Inc. common stock.
As a result of the Red Oak Bank acquisition, the Corporation acquired assets having a fair value of $115.3 million, including $89.6 million of net loans, $5.4 million of investment securities and $2.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, and assumed $70.7 million of deposits, $17.1 million of borrowings, and $792,000 of other liabilities.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and the excess cost over the fair value of net assets acquired (“goodwill”) in the transaction was $14.7 million. Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, goodwill is not being amortized in connection with this transaction and the goodwill will not be deductible for income tax purposes. The Corporation also recorded a core deposit intangible of $702,617 in connection with the acquisition, which is being amortized on a 10-year sum of the digits method.
The Corporation’s website address is http://www.centerbancorp.com. The Corporation makes available free of charge on or through its website the following: its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.


2


B)  Narrative Description of Business
The Bank offers a broad range of lending, depository and related financial services to commercial, industrial and governmental customers. In 1999, the Bank obtained full trust powers, enabling it to offer a variety of trust services to its customers. In the lending area, the Bank’s services include short and medium term loans, lines of credit, letters of credit, working capital loans, real estate construction loans and mortgage loans. In the depository area, the Bank offers demand deposits, savings accounts and time deposits. In addition, the Bank offers collection services, wire transfers, night depository and lock box services.
The Bank offers a broad range of consumer banking services, including interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit, IRA accounts, Automated Teller Machine (“ATM”) accessibility using Star Systems, Inc. service, secured and unsecured loans, mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, safe deposit boxes, Christmas club accounts, vacation club accounts, money orders and traveler’s checks.
The Bank offers various money market services. It deals in U.S. Treasury and U.S. Governmental agency securities, certificates of deposits, commercial paper and repurchase agreements.
Competitive pressures affect the Corporation’s manner of conducting business. Competition stems not only from other commercial banks but also from other financial institutions such as savings banks, savings and loan associations, mortgage companies, leasing companies and various other financial service and advisory companies. Many of the financial institutions operating in the Corporation’s primary market are substantially larger and offer a wider variety of products and services than the Corporation.
The Parent Corporation is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the New Jersey Department of Banking. As a national bank, the Bank is subject to regulation and periodic examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”). Deposits in the Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”).
The Parent Corporation is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board an annual report and such additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “Act”). In addition, the Federal Reserve Board makes periodic examinations of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. The Act requires each bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before it may acquire substantially all of the assets of any bank, or before it may acquire ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank, if, after such acquisition, it would own or control, directly or indirectly, more than 5 percent of the voting shares of such bank. The Bank Holding Company Act limits the activities which may be engaged in by the Company and its subsidiaries to those of banking, the ownership and acquisition of assets and securities of banking organizations, and the management of banking organizations, and to certain non-banking activities which the Federal Reserve Board finds, by order or regulation, to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling a bank as to be a proper incident thereto. The Federal Reserve Board is empowered to differentiate between activities by a bank holding company or a subsidiary thereof and activities commenced by acquisition of a going concern. With respect to non-banking activities, the Federal Reserve Board has by regulation determined that several non-banking activities are closely related to banking within the meaning of the Holding Company Act and thus may be performed by bank holding companies.
The operations of the Bank are subject to requirements and restrictions under federal law, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types and amounts of loans that may be granted, limitations on the types of investments that may be made and the types of services which may be offered. Various consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of the Bank. Approval of the Comptroller of the Currency is required for branching, bank mergers in which the continuing bank is a national bank and in connection with certain fundamental corporate changes affecting the Bank. There are various legal limitations, including Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, which govern the extent to which a bank subsidiary may finance or otherwise supply funds to its holding company or its holding company’s non-bank subsidiaries. Under federal law, no bank subsidiary may, subject to certain limited exceptions, make loans or extensions of credit to, or investments in the securities of, its parent or the non-bank subsidiaries of its parent (other than direct subsidiaries of such bank which are not financial subsidiaries) or take their securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. Each bank subsidiary is also subject to collateral security requirements for any loans or extensions of credit permitted by such exceptions.


3


FDICIA
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) among other things requires federal banking agencies to broaden the scope of regulatory corrective action taken with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements and to take such actions promptly in order to minimize losses to the FDIC. Under FDICIA, federal banking agencies have established five capital tiers: “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, and “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized”.
Under regulations adopted pursuant to these provisions, for an institution to be well capitalized it must have a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10 percent, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of at least 6 percent and a Tier I leverage ratio of at least 5 percent and not be subject to any specific capital order or directive. For an institution to be adequately capitalized, it must have a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8 percent, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of at least 4 percent and a Tier I leverage ratio of at least 4 percent (or in some cases 3 percent). Under the regulations, an institution will be deemed to be undercapitalized if the bank has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8 percent, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio that is less than 4 percent or a Tier I leverage ratio of less than 4 percent (or in some cases 3 percent). An institution will be deemed to be significantly undercapitalized if the bank has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 6 percent, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio that is less than 3 percent, or a Tier I leverage ratio of less than 3 percent and will be deemed to be critically undercapitalized if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2 percent. An institution may be deemed to be in a lower capitalization category if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating.
FDICIA also directs that each federal banking agency prescribe standards for depository institutions and depository institution holding companies relating to internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, a maximum ratio of classified assets to capital, a minimum ratio of market value to book value for publicly traded shares (if feasible) and such other standards as the agency deems appropriate.
FDICIA also contains a variety of other provisions that could affect the operations of the Corporation, including reporting requirements, regulatory standards for real estate lending, “truth in savings” provisions, the requirement that depository institutions give 90 days notice to customers and regulatory authorities before closing any branch, limitations on credit exposure between banks, restrictions on loans to a bank’s insiders and guidelines governing regulatory examinations.
Insurance Funds
The Corporation is a member of the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) of the FDIC. The FDIC also maintains another insurance fund, the Savings Association Insurance Fund (“SAIF”), which primarily covers savings and loan association deposits but also covers deposits that are acquired by a BIF-insured institution from a savings and loan association. As of the most recent quarterly assessment preformed by the FDIC, the Corporation had approximately $705.7 million of deposits subject to assessment at December 31, 2005, with respect to which it pays SAIF FICO Assessments.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 became effective in early 2000. The Modernization Act:
·
allows bank holding companies meeting management, capital, and Community Reinvestment Act standards to engage in a substantially broader range of non-banking activities than previously was permissible, including insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial companies; if a bank holding company elects to become a financial holding company, it files a certification, effective in 30 days, and thereafter may engage in certain financial activities without further approvals;
·
allows insurers and other financial services companies to acquire banks;
·
removes various restrictions that previously applied to bank holding company ownership of securities firms and mutual fund advisory companies; and
·
establishes the overall regulatory structure applicable to bank holding companies that also engage in insurance and securities operations.


4


The Modernization Act also modified other financial laws, including laws related to financial privacy and community reinvestment.
Community Reinvestment
Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as implemented by OCC regulations, a national bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the OCC, in connection with its examination of a national bank, to assess the bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by such bank.
Patriot Act
In response to the events of September 11, 2001, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”), was signed into law on October 26, 2001. The USA PATRIOT Act gives the federal government new powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers, increased information sharing, and broadened anti-money laundering requirements. By way of amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act, Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act encourages information sharing among bank regulatory agencies and law enforcement bodies. Further, certain provisions of Title III impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of financial institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit unions, money transfer agents and parties registered under the Commodity Exchange Act.
Among other requirements, Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act imposes the following requirements with respect to financial institutions:
·
All financial institutions must establish anti-money laundering programs that include, at a minimum: (i) internal policies, procedures, and controls; (ii) specific designation of an anti-money laundering compliance officer; (iii) ongoing employee training programs; and (iv) an independent audit function to test the anti-money laundering program.
·
The Secretary of the Department of Treasury, in conjunction with other bank regulators, was authorized to issue regulations that provide for minimum standards with respect to customer identification at the time new accounts are opened.
·
Financial institutions that establish, maintain, administer, or manage private banking accounts or correspondence accounts in the United States for non-United States persons or their representatives (including foreign individuals visiting the United States) are required to establish appropriate, specific and, where necessary, enhanced due diligence policies, procedures, and controls designed to detect and report money laundering.
·
Financial institutions are prohibited from establishing, maintaining, administering or managing correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks (foreign banks that do not have a physical presence in any country), and will be subject to certain record keeping obligations with respect to correspondent accounts of foreign banks.
·
Bank regulators are directed to consider a holding company’s effectiveness in combating money laundering when ruling on Federal Reserve Act and Bank Merger Act applications.
The Federal banking agencies have begun to propose and implement regulations pursuant to the USA PATRIOT Act. These proposed and interim regulations would require financial institutions to adopt the policies and procedures contemplated by the USA PATRIOT Act.
Other Legislation
On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the SOA. The stated goals of the SOA are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing


5


improprieties by publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws.
The SOA generally applies to all companies, both U.S. and non - U.S., that file or are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Exchange Act.
The SOA includes specific disclosure requirements and new corporate governance rules, requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules and mandates further studies of certain issues by the SEC. The SOA addresses, among other matters:
·
Audit committees for all reporting companies;
·
Certification of financial statements by the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer;
·
The forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the sale of an issuer’s securities by directors and senior officers in the twelve month period following initial publication of financial statements that later require restatement;
·
A prohibition on insider trading during pension plan black out periods;
·
Disclosure of off-balance sheet transactions;
·
A prohibition on personal loans to directors and officers;
·
Expedited filing requirements for Form 4’s;
·
Disclosure of a code of ethics and filing a Form 8-K for a change in or waiver of such code;
·
“Real time” filing of periodic reports;
·
The formation of a public accounting oversight board
·
Auditor independence; and
·
Various increased criminal penalties for violations of securities laws.
Proposed Legislation
From time to time proposals are made in the U.S. Congress and before various bank regulatory authorities, which would alter the policies of and place restrictions on different types of banking operations. It is impossible to predict the impact, if any, of potential legislative trends on the business of the Corporation and the Bank.
C)  Dividend Restrictions
Most of the revenue of the Corporation available for payment of dividends on its capital stock will result from amounts paid to the Parent Corporation by the Bank. There are a number of statutory and regulatory restrictions applicable to the payment of dividends by national banks and bank holding companies. First, the Bank must obtain the approval of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “Comptroller”) if the total dividends declared by the Bank in any year will exceed the total of the Bank’s net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for that year and retained profits (as defined) for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. Second, the Bank cannot pay dividends unless, after the payment of such dividends, capital would be unimpaired and remaining surplus would equal 100% of capital. Third, the authority of Federal regulators to monitor the levels of capital maintained by the Corporation and the Bank (see Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the discussion of FDICIA above), as well as the authority of such regulators to prohibit unsafe or unsound practices, could limit the amount of dividends which the Parent Corporation and the Bank may pay. Regulatory pressures to reclassify and charge-off loans and to establish additional loan loss reserves also can have the effect of reducing current operating earnings and thus impacting an institution’s ability to pay dividends. Regulatory authorities have indicated that bank holding companies which are experiencing high levels of non-performing loans and loan charge-offs should review their dividend policies. Reference is also made to Note 15 of the Notes to the Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2005 Annual Report incorporated herein by reference.


6


D)  Statistical Information
(Reference is also made to Exhibit 13.1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K)
Information regarding interest sensitivity is incorporated by reference to pages 34 through 35 of the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders (the “2005 Annual Report”).
Information regarding certain related party transactions is incorporated by reference to Note 6 of the Notes to the Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2005 Annual Report incorporated herein by reference.
I. Investment Portfolio
a)
For information regarding the carrying value of the investment portfolio, see pages 54-55 of the 2005 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
b)
The following table illustrates the maturity distribution and weighted average yield on a tax-equivalent basis for investment securities at December 31, 2005, on a contractual maturity basis.
c)
There were no municipal securities of the single issuer exceeding 10 percent of stockholders’ equity at the end of 2005.
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
US Treasury
& Agency
Securities
 
Federal
Agency
Obligations
 
Obligations
of U.S.
States &
Political
Subdivisions
 
Other
Securities
Federal
Reserve &
Federal
Home Loan
Bank Stock
 
Total
 
                                 
Due in 1 year or less
   
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
     
Amortized Cost
 
$
101
 
  
1,995
 
$
 
$
36,954
 
$
39,050
 
Market Value
 
 
99
   
1,983
 
 
 
$
37,099
 
 
39,181
 
Weighted Average Yield
 
 
3.20
%
 
3.61
%
 
%
 
4.02
%
 
4.00
%
Due after one year through five years        
 
 
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortized Cost
 
$
   
23,318
 
$
7,124
 
$
24,264
 
$
54,706
 
Market Value
 
 
   
22,820
 
 
7,098
 
 
24,303
 
 
54,221
 
Weighted Average Yield
 
 
   
4.01
%
 
3.81
%
 
4.60
%
 
4.25
%
Due after five years through ten years
 
 
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortized Cost
 
$
474
   
53,961
 
$
42,223
 
$
8,028
 
$
104,686
 
Market Value
 
 
482
   
52,421
 
 
41,625
 
 
8,029
 
 
102,557
 
Weighted Average Yield
 
 
5.61
%
 
4.20
%
 
3.73
%
 
5.88
%
 
4.15
%
Due after ten years
 
 
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortized Cost
 
$
1,135
   
169,560
 
$
56,231
 
$
110,057
 
$
336,983
 
Market Value
 
 
1,179
   
165,380
 
 
55,881
 
 
110,399
 
 
332,839
 
Weighted Average Yield
 
 
6.44
%
 
4.37
%
 
4.07
%
 
5.28
%
 
4.62
%
Total
 
 
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortized Cost
 
$
1,710
   
248,834
 
$
105,578
 
$
179,303
 
$
535,425
 
Market Value
 
 
1,760
   
242,604
 
 
104,604
 
 
179,830
 
 
528,798
 
Weighted Average Yield
 
 
6.02
%
 
4.29
%
 
3.91
%
 
4.93
%
 
4.45
%
The securities listed in the table above are either rated investment grade by Moody’s and/or Standard and Poor’s or have shadow credit ratings from a credit agency supporting investment grade and conform to the Corporation’s investment policy guidelines.


7


The following table sets forth the book value of the Corporation’s investment securities, both available for sale and held to maturity, as of December 31 for each of the last three years.
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
U.S. Treasury & Agency Securities
  
$
1,710
     
$
5,772
     
$
3,607
 
Federal Agency Obligations
   
248,834
   
280,931
   
265,031
 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions                           
 
 
105,578
 
 
102,216
 
 
99,391
 
Other Securities
 
 
153,597
 
 
31,514
 
 
36,121
 
FHLB Stock and other equity securities
 
 
25,706
 
 
156,721
 
 
115,084
 
Total Book Value
 
$
535,425
 
$
577,144
 
$
519,234
 
For other information regarding the Corporation’s investment securities portfolio, see Pages 19, 26, 27, 35, 42, 43, 46 and 52-57 of the 2005 Annual Report.
II. Loan Portfolio
The following table presents information regarding the components of the Corporation’s loan portfolio on the dates indicated.
 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
                                 
Commercial and industrial
 
$
243,847
    
$
150,281
    
$
127,307
    
$
104,481
    
$
89,772
 
Real estate residential mortgage
 
 
261,028
 
 
221,893
 
 
214,482
 
 
119,674
 
 
116,335
 
Installment
 
 
951
 
 
5,130
 
 
7,736
 
 
4,896
 
 
5,179
 
Total
 
 
505,826
 
 
377,304
 
 
349,525
 
 
229,051
 
 
211,286
 
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses
 
 
4,937
 
 
3,781
 
 
3,002
 
 
2,498
 
 
2,191
 
Net total
 
$
500,889
 
$
373,523
 
$
346,523
 
$
226,553
 
$
209,095
 
Since 2001, demand for the Bank’s commercial loan, commercial real estate and real estate mortgage products improved gradually. The increase in such loans in 2005 was a result of continued business demand coupled with the loans acquired from the merger with Red Oak Bank. In 2005 the increase in Residential Mortgage Loans is attributable to the low interest environment that spurred increased refinancing activity in the market and the addition of Red Oak Bank. Business development and marketing programs coupled with positive market trends supported the growth in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
The maturities of loans at December 31, 2005 are listed below.
 
 
At December 31, 2005, Maturing
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
In One Year
Or Less
 
After One Year
Through
Five Years
 
After
Five Years
 
Total
 
                           
Construction loans
 
$
32,063
     
$
5,977
     
$
1,044
     
$
39,084
 
Commercial real estate loans
 
 
 
 
3,131
 
 
122,626
 
 
125,757
 
Commercial loans
 
 
43,580
 
 
12,399
 
 
23,027
 
 
79,006
 
All other loans
   
633
   
10,503
   
250,843
   
261,979
 
Total
 
 
76,276
   
32,010
   
397,540
   
505,826
 
Loans with:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rates
 
 
5,596
 
 
20,843
 
 
170,332
 
 
196,771
 
Variable rates
 
 
70,680
 
 
11,167
 
 
227,208
 
 
309,055
 
Total
 
$
76,276
 
$
32,010
 
$
397,540
 
$
505,826
 
Lending is one of Center Bancorp’s primary business activities. The Corporation’s loan portfolio consists of both retail and commercial loans, serving the diverse customer base in its market area. In 2005, net average total loans comprised 44.2 percent of average interest-earning assets. The Corporation has experienced a compound growth rate in average loans since 2001 of 17.14 percent. Average loans amounted to $454.4 million in 2005 compared with $365.1 million in 2004 and $276.5 million in 2003. The composition of Center Bancorp’s loan portfolio continues to change due to the local economy. Factors such as the economic climate, interest rates, real


8


estate values and employment all contribute to these changes. Loan growth has been generated through business development efforts and entry, through branching, into new markets.
Average commercial loans increased to $206.4 million or by approximately $61.0 million or 42.0 percent in 2005 as compared with 2004. The Corporation seeks to create growth in commercial lending by offering customized products and competitive pricing and by capitalizing on the positive trends in its market area. Specialized products are offered to meet the financial requirements of the Corporation’s clients. It is the objective of the Corporation’s credit policies to diversify the commercial loan portfolio to limit concentrations in any single industry.
The Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio includes, in addition to real estate development, loans to the manufacturing, services, automobile, professional and retail trade sectors, and to specialized borrowers, including high technology businesses. A large proportion of the Corporation’s commercial loans have interest rates which reprice with changes in short-term market interest rates or mature in one year or less.
Average mortgage loans, which amounted to $246.5 million in 2005, increased $32.4 million or 15.1 percent as compared with average mortgage loans of $214.1 million in 2004 (which reflected a 23.0 percent increase over 2003). The Corporation’s long-term mortgage portfolio includes both residential and commercial financing. Growth during the past two years largely reflected brisk activity in mortgage financing. Although a portion of the Corporation’s commercial mortgages adjust to changes in the prime rate, as well as indices tied to 5-year Treasury Notes, and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York 5-year advance rate, most of these loans and residential mortgage loans have fixed interest rates.
During 2001, 2002 and 2003 residential loan growth was affected by refinancing activity, competition among lenders and lower interest rates. In 2004, this was mitigated to some extent, by the promotion of variable interest rate products including a 10-year amortizing mortgage, 7/1 adjustable rate mortgage and an aggressive promotional campaign for home equity lines of credit, which resulted in increased volumes in these categories of loans. The momentum of 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 as more variable rate products were promoted, including 3/1 and 5/1 adjustable rate mortgages, and fixed rate home equity loans became a popular choice for homeowners during 2005 as interest rates began to rise and consumers looked to lock in fixed rates.
Average construction loans and other temporary mortgage financing increased from 2004 to 2005 by $16.3 million to $25.6 million. Such loans decreased by $931,000 from 2003 to 2004. The change in construction and other temporary mortgage lending has been generated by the market activity of the Corporation’s customers engaging in residential and commercial development throughout New Jersey. Interest rates on such mortgages are generally tied to key short-term market interest rates. Funds are typically advanced to the builder or developer during various stages of construction and upon completion of the project it is contemplated that the loans will be repaid by cash flows derived from the ongoing project.
Loans to individuals include personal loans, student loans, and home improvement loans, as well as financing for automobiles and other vehicles. Such loans averaged $1.5 million in 2005, as compared with $5.6 million in 2004 and $6.3 million in 2003. The decrease in loans to individuals during 2005 was due to decreases in volumes of new personal loans (single-pay), and in part by declines in volumes of new automobile loans, as a result of aggressive marketing campaigns by automobile manufacturers, which was not sufficient to offset the repayment of existing loans.
Home equity loans, inclusive of home equity lines, as well as traditional secondary mortgage loans, have become popular with consumers due to their tax advantages over other forms of consumer borrowing. Home equity loans and secondary mortgages averaged $45.4 million in 2005, an increase of $3.5 million or 8.4 percent as compared with average home equity loans of $41.9 million in 2004. Interest rates on floating rate home equity lines are generally tied to the prime rate while most other loans to individuals, including fixed rate home equity loans, are medium-term (ranging between one-to-five years) and carry fixed interest rates. The decreases in home equity lines outstanding during 2005 was due in part to prime rate increases totaling 2.00 percentage points in reaction to the Federal Reserve’s increasing the Federal Funds target rate eight times which prompted consumers to seek fixed rate loans. The floating rate home equity lines became less attractive and consumers were prone to convert these loan balances into fixed rate loan products such as home equity loans and refinanced first mortgage loans or to simply pay them off.
At December 31, 2005, the Corporation had total lending commitments outstanding of $147.0 million, of which approximately 50.3 percent were for commercial loans, commercial real estate loans and construction loans.


9


Credit risks are an inherent part of the lending function. The Corporation has set in place specific policies and guidelines to limit credit risks. The following describes the Corporation’s credit management policy and describes certain risk elements in its earning assets portfolio.
Credit Management The maintenance of comprehensive and effective credit policies is a paramount objective of the Corporation. Credit procedures are enforced at each individual branch office and are maintained at the senior administrative level as well as through internal control procedures.
Prior to extending credit, the Corporation’s credit policy generally requires a review of the borrower’s credit history, repayment capacity, collateral and purpose of each loan. Requests for most commercial and consumer loans are to be accompanied by financial statements and other relevant financial data for evaluation. After the granting of a loan or lending commitment, this financial data is typically updated and evaluated by the credit staff on a periodic basis for the purpose of identifying potential problems. Construction financing requires a periodic submission by the borrowers of sales/leasing status reports regarding their projects, as well as, in some cases, inspections of the project sites by independent engineering firms and/or independent consultants. Advances are normally made only upon the satisfactory completion of periodic phases of construction.
Certain lending authorities are granted to loan officers based upon each officer’s position and experience. However, large dollar loans and lending lines are reported to and are subject to the approval of the Bank’s loan committees and/or board of directors. Loan committees are chaired by either the president or a senior officer of the Bank.
The Corporation has established its own internal loan-to-value limits for real estate loans. In general, except as described below, these internal limits are not permitted to exceed the following supervisory limits:
Loan Category
 
Loan-to-Value Limit
 
 
 
Raw Land
   
65%
Land Development
 
75%
Commercial, Multifamily and other non-residential construction                                          
 
80%
Construction: One to Four Family Residential
 
85%
Improved Property (excluding One to Four Family Residential)
 
85%
Owner-Occupied One to Four Family and Home Equity *
 
90%
——————
*
For a permanent Mortgage or home equity loan on owner occupied one to four family residential property with an LTV that exceeds 90 percent at origination, private mortgage insurance or readily marketable collateral is to be obtained. “Readily marketable collateral” means insured deposits, financial instruments and bullion in which the bank has a perfected interest. Financial instruments and bullion are to be salable under ordinary circumstances with reasonable promptness at a fair market value.
It may be appropriate in individual cases to originate loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of the supervisory loan-to-value limits, based on support provided by other credit factors. The President must approve such non-conforming loans. The Bank must identify all non-conforming loans and their aggregate amount must be reported at least quarterly to the Director’s Loan Committee. Non-conforming loans should not exceed 100% of capital, or 30% with respect to non 1 to 4 family residential loans.
Collateral margin guidelines are based on cost, market or other appraised value to maintain a reasonable amount of collateral protection in relation to the inherent risk in the loan. This does not mitigate the fundamental analysis of cash flow from the conversion of assets in the normal course of business or from operations to repay the loan. It is merely designed to provide a cushion to minimize the risk of loss if the ultimate collection of the loan becomes dependent on the liquidation of security pledged.
The Corporation also seeks to minimize lending risk through loan diversification. The composition of the Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio reflects and is highly dependent upon the economy and industrial make-up of the region it serves. Effective loan diversification spreads risk to many different industries, thereby reducing the impact of downturns in any specific industry on overall loan profitability.
Credit quality is monitored through an internal review process, which includes a credit Risk Grading System that facilitates the early detection of problem loans. Under this grading system all commercial loans and commercial mortgage loans are graded in accordance with the risk characteristics inherent in each loan. Problem loans include


10


“Watch List” loans, non-accrual loans, and loans which conform to the regulatory definitions of criticized and classified loans.
A Problem Asset Report is prepared monthly and is examined by the senior management of the Bank, the Corporation’s Loan and Discount Committee and Board of Directors. This review is designed to enable management to take such actions as are considered necessary to identify and remedy problems on a timely basis.
The Bank’s internal loan review process is complimented by an independent loan review conducted throughout the year, under the mandate and approval of the Corporation’s Board of Directors. In addition, regularly scheduled audits performed by the Bank’s internal audit function are designed to ensure the integrity of the credit and risk monitoring systems currently in place.
Risk Elements. Risk elements include non-performing loans, loans past due ninety days or more as to interest or principal payments but not placed on a non-accrual status, potential problem loans, other real estate owned, net, and other non-performing interest-earning assets.
Non-performing and Past Due Loans, OREO. Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and troubled debt restructuring. Non-accrual loans represent loans on which interest accruals have been suspended. It is the Corporation’s general policy to consider the charge-off of loans when they become contractually past due ninety days or more as to interest or principal payments or when other internal or external factors indicate that collection of principal or interest is doubtful. Troubled debt restructurings represent loans on which a concession was granted to a borrower, such as a reduction in interest rate, which is lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risks. At December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 the Corporation did not have any other real estate owned (OREO).
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis at December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, and 2001, are as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
                                 
Mortgage Real Estate
 
$
87
    
$
    
$
    
$
    
$
 
Commercial
 
 
300
 
 
 
 
1
 
 
 
 
84
 
Installment
 
 
 
 
 
 
25
 
 
229
 
 
25
 
Total non-accrual loans
 
$
387
 
$
 
$
26
 
$
229
 
$
109
 
The increase in non-accrual loans in 2005 is primary related to business loans acquired in the Acquisition of Red Oak Bank and were comprised of two commercial borrowers.
Accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments are as follows:
 
 
December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
                                 
Commercial
 
$
179
     
$
    
$
    
$
    
$
 
Installment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
 
Total accruing loans 90 days or more past due
 
$
179
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
8
 
The increase in accruing loans 90 days or more past due consisted of one commercial loan.
There were no loans which are “troubled debt restructurings” as of the last day of each of the last five years.
In general, it is the policy of management to consider the charge-off of loans at the point that they become past due in excess of 90 days, with the exception of loans that are secured by cash or marketable securities or mortgage loans, which are in the process of foreclosure.
Other known “potential problem loans” (as defined by SEC regulations) as of December 31, 2005 have been identified and classified. Criticized loans have been risk rated as other assets especially mentioned. Such loans amounted to $299,850 at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2005, there was a commercial loan secured by real-estate in the amount of $1.5 million that was past due in the 30- 89 days category and not classified as a problem loan.  Subsequent to December 31, 2005, the loan was brought current; however, the Corporation does not intend to renew the loan at its scheduled maturity on March 15, 2006, and expects to initiate foreclosure action.


11


With respect to concentrations of credit within the Corporation’s portfolio of credits at December 31, 2005, $38.1 million of the commercial loan portfolio or 15.6 percent of $243.8 million, represented outstanding working capital loans to various real estate developers. All but $12.1million of these loans are secured by mortgages on land and on buildings under construction.
For additional information regarding risk elements in the Corporation’s loan portfolio, see pages 28-30 of the 2005 Annual Report and Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2005 Annual Report.
III. Allowance for Loan Losses
Implicit in the lending function is the fact that loan losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower and prevailing economic conditions. The allowance for loan losses has been allocated below according to the estimated amount deemed to be reasonably necessary to provide for the possibility of losses being incurred within the following categories of loans at December 31, for each of the past five years. The table below shows, for three types of loans, the amounts of the allowance allocable to such loans and the percentage of such loans to total loans. The percentage of loans to total loans is based upon the classification of loans shown on page 8 of this report.
   
Commercial
 
Real Estate Mortgage
 
Installment
 
Unallocated
     
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amount
of
Allowance
 
Loans
to
Total Loans
%
 
Amount
of
Allowance
 
Loans
to
Total Loans
%
 
Amount
of
Allowance
 
Loans
to
Total Loans
%
 
Amount
of
Allowance
 
Total
 
                                                   
2005
  
$
3,453
  
 
48.2
  
$
594
  
 
51.6
  
$
55
  
 
0.2
  
$
835
  
$
4,937
 
2004
 
$
2,561
 
 
39.8
 
$
744
   
58.8
 
$
8
 
 
1.4
 
$
468
 
$
3,781
 
2003
 
$
1,763
 
 
38.6
 
$
986
   
59.2
 
$
80
 
 
2.2
 
$
173
 
$
3,002
 
2002
 
$
1,846
 
 
45.8
 
$
494
   
52.3
 
$
46
 
 
1.9
 
$
112
 
$
2,498
 
2001
 
$
877
 
 
42.5
 
$
876
   
55.1
 
$
297
 
 
2.4
 
$
141
 
$
2,191
 
Information regarding charge-offs and recoveries is incorporated by reference to page 29 of the 2005 Annual Report.
IV. Deposits
Information regarding average amounts/rates of deposits is incorporated by reference to pages 35 and 37 of the 2005 Annual Report. Information regarding the maturity of time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more and other time certificates of deposit is presented in the table below as of December 31, 2005.
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
3 Months
or
Less
 
Over 3
Months
Through
6 Months
 
Over 6
Months
Through
12 Months
 
Over
12 Months
 
Total
 
                                 
Time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or greater
  
$
123,994
  
$
9,026
  
$
10,786
  
$
10,603
  
$
154,409
 
Time certificates of deposit of less than $100,000
 
 
20,106
 
 
21,849
 
 
23,119
 
 
19,696
 
 
84,770
 
V. Return on Equity and Assets
Information regarding the return on average assets, return on average equity, the equity to assets ratio and dividend payout ratio is incorporated by reference to pages 1 and 23 of the 2005 Annual Report. Return on average assets was 0.69 percent, 0.81 percent and 0.74 percent for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. The dividend payout ratio was 59.1, 42.5 percent and 47.0 percent for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Return on tangible average shareholders equity was 10.3 percent in 2005 compared with 13.7 percent in 2004 and 12.9 percent in 2003.
VI. Short-term Borrowings
Information regarding the amount outstanding of short-term borrowings is incorporated by reference to pages 38 and 59-60 of the 2005 Annual Report.


12


ITEM 1A – Risk Factors
An investment in the Parent’s common stock involves risks. Stockholders should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, before deciding to purchase the Parent’s common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, the Corporation’s business, financial condition or operating results may be harmed. In that case, the trading price of the Parent’s common stock may decline, and stockholders may lose part or all of their investment in the Parent’s common stock.
We are subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively impact our financial performance.
We are unable to predict actual fluctuations of market interest rates with complete accuracy. Rate fluctuations are affected by many factors, including:
·
inflation;
·
recession;
·
a rise in unemployment;
·
tightening money supply; and
·
domestic and international disorder and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets.
Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce profits. We expect that we will continue to realize income from the differential or “spread” between the interest we earn on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets, and the interest we pay on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. At present, we are somewhat vulnerable to increases in interest rates because if rates increase significantly, our interest-earning assets may not reprice as rapidly as our interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in levels of market interest rates could materially and adversely affect our net interest spread, asset quality, levels of prepayments and cash flows as well as the market value of our securities portfolio and overall profitability.
Union Center National Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to regulatory limitations which, to the extent that our holding company requires such dividends in the future, may affect our holding company’s ability to honor its obligations and pay dividends.
As a holding company, we are a separate legal entity from Union Center National Bank and its subsidiaries and do not have significant operations of our own. We currently depend on the Bank’s cash and liquidity to pay our operating expenses and dividends to shareholders. We cannot assure you that in the future the Bank will have the capacity to pay the necessary dividends and that we will not require dividends from the Bank to satisfy our obligations. The availability of dividends from the Bank is limited by various statutes and regulations. It is possible, depending upon our and the Bank’s financial condition and other factors, that bank regulators could assert that payment of dividends or other payments by the Bank are an unsafe or unsound practice. In the event that the Bank is unable to pay dividends, we may not be able to service our obligations as they become due, or pay dividends on our common stock. Consequently, the inability to receive dividends from the Bank could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.
The Bank’s allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.
Like all financial institutions, the Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. If the Bank’s allowance for loan losses is not adequate to cover actual loan losses, future provisions for loan losses could materially and adversely affect our operating results. The Bank’s allowance for loan losses is determined by analyzing historical loan losses, current trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, plans for problem loan resolution, the opinions of its regulators, changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio and industry information. The Bank also considers the impact of economic events, the outcome of which are uncertain. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates, that may be beyond our control, and these losses may exceed current estimates. Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, review the Bank’s loans and allowance for loan losses. While we believe that the Bank’s allowance for loan losses in relation to its current loan portfolio is adequate to cover current losses, we cannot assure you that the Bank will not need to increase its allowance for loan losses or


13


that regulators will not require it to increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could materially and adversely affect our earnings and profitability.
The Bank is subject to various lending and other economic risks that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in economic conditions, particularly an economic slowdown, could hurt the Bank’s business. The Bank’s business is directly affected by political and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies and inflation, all of which are beyond our control. A deterioration in economic conditions, particularly within New Jersey, could result in the following consequences, any of which could hurt our business materially:
·
loan delinquencies may increase;
·
problem assets and foreclosures may increase;
·
demand for our products and services may decline; and
·
collateral for loans made by the Bank may decline in value, in turn reducing the Bank’s clients’ borrowing power.
A downturn in the real estate market could hurt our business. If there is a significant decline in real estate values in New Jersey, the collateral for the Bank’s loans will provide less security. As a result, the Bank’s ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the underlying real estate would be diminished, and the Bank would be more likely to suffer losses on defaulted loans.
The Bank may suffer losses in its loan portfolio despite its underwriting practices.
The Bank seeks to mitigate the risks inherent in its loan portfolio by adhering to specific underwriting practices. Although we believe that the Bank’s underwriting criteria are appropriate for the various kinds of loans that it makes, the Bank may incur losses on loans that meet its underwriting criteria, and these losses may exceed the amounts set aside as reserves in its allowance for loan losses.
The Bank faces strong competition from other financial institutions, financial service companies and other organizations offering services similar to the services that the Bank provides.
Many competitors offer the same types of loans and banking services that the Bank offers or similar types of such services. These competitors include other national banks, savings associations, regional banks and other community banks. The Bank also faces competition from many other types of financial institutions, including finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, mortgage banks and other financial intermediaries. In this regard, the Bank’s competitors include other state and national banks and major financial companies whose greater resources may afford them a marketplace advantage by enabling them to maintain numerous banking locations, offer a broader suite of services and mount extensive promotional and advertising campaigns. Our inability to compete effectively would adversely affect our business.
If we do not successfully integrate the bank which we recently acquired or other entities that we may acquire in the future, the combined company may be adversely affected.
The success of our enterprise after our recent acquisition of Red Oak Bank and after other acquisitions that we may consummate in the future will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate the acquired entities into our existing franchise, including our ability to centralize certain administrative functions and eliminate unnecessary duplication of other functions. We may experience difficulties in accomplishing this integration or in effectively managing the combined company. Any actual cost savings or revenue enhancements that we may anticipate will depend on future expense levels and operating results, the timing of certain events and general industry, regulatory and business conditions. Many of these events will be beyond our control, and we cannot provide assurances that the integration of Red Oak Bank or other businesses that we may acquire will be successful.
ITEM 1B – Unresolved Staff Comments
None


14


ITEM 2 – Properties
The Bank’s operations are located at five sites in Union Township, one in Springfield Township, one in Berkeley Heights, one in Vauxhall and one in Summit, Union County, New Jersey. The Bank also has one site in Madison, and three sites in Morristown, Morris County, New Jersey. The principal office is located at 2455 Morris Avenue, Union, Union County, New Jersey. The principal office is a two story building constructed in 1993. On October 9, 2004, the Bank opened a 19,555 square foot office facility on Springfield Road in Union New Jersey, which serves as the Bank’s Operations and Data Center. On October 1, 2004 the Corporation signed an agreement to purchase premises at 44 North Avenue Cranford, New Jersey to be used to construct a full service branch facility. On October 28, 2005 the Corporation signed an agreement to lease a branch facility to be constructed at 209 Ridgedale Avenue, Florham Park New Jersey.
Six of the locations are owned by the Bank and six of the locations are leased by the Bank. The lease of the Five Points Branch located at 356 Chestnut Street, Union, New Jersey expires November 30, 2007 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. The lease of the Career Center Branch located in Union High School expires October 31, 2008. The lease of the Madison office located at 300 Main Street, Madison, New Jersey expires June 6, 2010 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. The lease of the Millburn Mall Branch located at 2933 Vauxhall Road, Vauxhall, New Jersey expires January 31, 2013 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. The lease of the Morristown office located at 86 South Street, Suite 2A, Morristown, New Jersey expires February 28, 2008 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. The lease on the Red Oak banking Center located at 190 Park Avenue, Morristown New Jersey expires October 28, 2015 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. The lease of the Summit branch located at 392 Springfield Avenue, Summit, New Jersey expires March 31, 2009 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. The lease for the Boonton/Mountain Lakes office (currently under construction) located at Ely Place, Boonton New Jersey expires 15 years from the commencement or date of occupancy (projected to be the third quarter of 2006) and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. In 2005 the Corporation signed an agreement to lease a Bank branch to be built at 209 Ridgedale Avenue, Florham Park, New Jersey Florham Park, New Jersey. (See page 75 of the 2005 Annual Report for a complete listing of all branches and locations. The Drive In/Walk Up located at 2022 Stowe Street, Union, New Jersey is adjacent to a part of the Center Office facility.) The Bank has five off-site ATM locations. One at Union Hospital, 100 Galloping Hill Road, Union, New Jersey, Three at New Jersey Transit stations; Union Train Station located on Green Lane in Union, New Jersey, Madison Train Station, Kings Road and Maple Avenue, Madison New Jersey, Chatham Train Station Main Street and Elmwood Avenue, Chatham New Jersey and one location at the Boys and Girls Club of Union, 1050 Jeanette Avenue, Union, New Jersey.
ITEM 3 – Legal Proceedings
There are no significant pending legal proceedings involving the Parent Corporation or Bank other than those arising out of routine operations. Management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of such litigation will have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Parent Corporation and Bank on a consolidated basis. Such statement constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from this statement as a result of various factors, including the uncertainties arising in proving facts within the judicial process.
ITEM 4 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Corporation had no matter submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2005.


15


ITEM 4A – Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name and age of each executive officer of the Parent Corporation, the period during which each such person has served as an officer of the Parent Corporation or the Bank and each such person’s business experience (including all positions with the Parent Corporation and the Bank) for the past five years:
Name and Age
 
Officer Since
 
Business Experience
         
John J. Davis
 
1982 the Parent Corporation
 
President & Chief Executive Officer
Age - 63
 
1977 the Bank
 
of the Parent Corporation and the Bank
         
Anthony C. Weagley
 
1996 the Parent Corporation
 
Vice President & Treasurer of the Parent Corporation
Age - 44
 
1985 the Bank
 
Senior Vice President & Cashier (1996-Present),
 
 
 
 
Vice President & Cashier (1991 - 1996) and
 
 
 
 
Assistant Vice President (1991-1997) of the Bank
         
Charles E. Nunn
 
2004 the Parent Corporation:
 
Vice President of the Parent Corporation and
Age - 53
 
2004 the Bank
 
Senior Vice President of the Bank (2004-Present)
 
 
 
 
Senior Vice President of UnitedTrust Bank (1996-2004)
         
John F. McGowan
 
1998 the Parent Corporation
 
Vice President of the Parent Corporation
Age - 59
 
1996 the Bank
 
Senior Vice President (1998-Present) of the Bank
         
Lori A. Wunder
 
1998 the Parent Corporation
 
Vice President of the Parent Corporation
Age - 41
 
1995 the Bank
 
Senior Vice President (1998-Present)
 
 
 
 
Vice President (1997-1998)
 
 
 
 
Assistant Vice President (1996-1997) and
 
 
 
 
Assistant Cashier (1995-1996) of the Bank
         
Julie D’Aloia
 
1999 the Parent Corporation
 
Vice President & Secretary (2001-Present) and
Age - 44
 
 
 
Corporate Secretary (1998-2000) of the Parent
 
 
1998 the Bank
 
Corporation Senior Vice President & Secretary (2001-
 
 
 
 
Present) Assistant-To-The-President of the Bank and
 
 
 
 
Corporate Secretary (1995-1998) of the Bank
         
Mark S. Cardone
 
2001 the Parent Corporation
 
Vice President of the Parent Corporation
Age - 42
 
2001 the Bank
 
Senior Vice President & Branch Administrator
 
 
 
 
of the Bank (2001 - Present)
 
 
 
 
Vice President of Fleet Bank (1996-2001)



16


PART II
ITEM 5 – Market Information for the Registrant’s Stock and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by Item 5 of Form 10-K appears on page 41 of the 2005 Annual Report to shareholders (the “2005 Annual Report”) and is incorporated herein by reference. As of December 31, 2005 there were 767 holders of record of the Parent Corporation’s Common Stock.
The following table gives information about the Corporation’s Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under the Corporation’s 1999 Incentive Plan, 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan, 1993 Outside Director Stock Option Plan and 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan as of December 31, 2005. These plans were the Corporation’s only equity compensation plans in existence as of December 31, 2005.
Plan Category
 
Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(a)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
(b)
 
Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))
(c)
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders
 
377,894
 
$5.41 - $15.88
 
703,955
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
377,894
 
$5.41 - $15.88
 
703,955
In addition, in connection with the corporation’s acquisition of Red Oak Bank, the Corporation converted options covering 56,266 shares of Red Oak Bank common stock into options covering 54,514 shares of the corporations common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $8.39.
ITEM 6 – Selected Financial Data
The information required by Item 6 of Form 10-K appears on pages 18 and 19 of the 2005 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The information required by Item 7 of Form 10-K appears on pages 20 through 42 of the 2005 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information required by Item 7A of Form 10-K appears on pages 34 through 36 of the 2005 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The information required by Item 8 of Form 10-K appears on pages 43 through 46 of the 2005 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9 – Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None


17


ITEM 9A – Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporation maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in its Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Corporation evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as of December 31, 2005. Based upon that evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date due to the material weakness described below in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)).
As a consequence of the material weakness noted above, the Corporation applied other procedures designed to improve the reliability of its accounting for income taxes. Based on these other procedures, management (i) believes that the consolidated financial statements included in this report, as well as the Corporation’s financial statements for each quarter in 2005, as previously reported, are fairly stated in all material respects and (ii) does not believe that the material weakness will result in any adjustments to previously released financial statements.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Corporation’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Corporation’s internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management, Board of Directors and shareholders regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Corporation; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As part of the Corporation’s program to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management used the control criteria framework of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission published in its report entitled Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Based on the Corporation’s assessment, a material weakness was identified in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As a result of its assessment, the Corporation has identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 related to accounting for income taxes. Specifically, the Corporation did not employ an adequate number of skilled personnel in its tax department to prepare the reconciliation of


18


internal tax schedules to the general ledger and supporting documentation in a timely manner, and there was inadequate and ineffective analysis and management review of the relevant documentation supporting the deferred tax accounts related to the accounting for an acquisition of a business. As a result, material misstatements were identified in the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities and income tax expense accounts that were corrected prior to the issuance of the 2005 consolidated financial statements. Further, there was more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the Corporation’s interim or annual financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
Because of the material weakness described above, management concluded that the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2005. The independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements has issued an audit report on management's assessment of, and the effectiveness of, the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. This report appears in Item 9A(c).
(c) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Center Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)) that Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Corporation) did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, because of the effect of a material weakness identified in management’s assessment, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As a result of its assessment, the Corporation has identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 related to accounting for income taxes. Specifically, the Corporation did not employ an adequate number of skilled personnel in its tax department to prepare the reconciliation of internal tax schedules to the general ledger and supporting documentation in a timely manner, and there was


19


inadequate and ineffective analysis and management review of the relevant documentation supporting the deferred tax accounts related to the accounting for an acquisition of a business. As a result, material misstatements were identified in the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities and income tax expense accounts. Further, there was more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the Corporation’s interim or annual financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005. The aforementioned material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2005 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 8, 2006, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Corporation has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
(d) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the last fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, except as described below. Subsequent to December 31, 2005, the Corporation has taken and will take various corrective actions to remediate the material weakness noted above. By their nature, such actions require a period of time to become fully effective. These remedial actions are as follows:
·
the Corporation will hire additional staff in the first quarter of 2006;
·
the Corporation has increased its use, and will further increase its use, of third-party tax service providers for the more complex areas of the Corporation’s income tax accounting; and
·
the Corporation has increased the formality and rigor to controls and procedures over accounting for income taxes.
ITEM 9B – Other Information
None


20


PART III
ITEM 10 – Directors of the Registrant
Except as set forth in the next paragraph the Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The Corporation maintains a code of ethics applicable to the Corporation’s chief executive officer, senior financial professional personnel (including the Corporation’s chief financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar transactions), all other executive officers and all directors. The Corporation also maintains a code of conduct applicable to all other employees. Copies of both coeds were filed as exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The corporation will provide copies of such codes to any person without charge, upon request to Anthony C. Weagely, Vice President and Treasurer, Center Bancorp, Inc., 2455 Morris Avenue, Union, NJ 07083.
ITEM 11 – Executive Compensation
The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 13 – Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 14 – Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


21


PART IV
ITEM 15 – Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements
 
Pages in
2005
Annual Report
 
   
 
Consolidated Statements of Condition at December 31, 2005 and 2004
 
43
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003
 
44
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
 
45
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003
 
46
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
42-73
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
74
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
75
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
 
76
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
All Schedules have been omitted as inapplicable, or not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.
(a) (3) Exhibits
2.1
Amended and Restated Agreement and plan of Merger dated as of December 17, 2004, by and between the Registrant and Red Oak Bank, is incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 8, 2005.
 
3.1 
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.
 
3.2
 
By-Laws of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
10.1
 
Employment agreement between the Registrant and John F. McGowan, dated as of January 1, 1999, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
10.2
 
Employment agreement between the Registrant and John J. Davis is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.
 
10.3
 
The Registrant’s 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
 
10.4
 
The Registrant’s 1993 Outside Director Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
 
10.5
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (“SERPS”) are incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994.
 
10.6
 
Executive Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994.
 



22




10.7
 
Employment agreement between the Registrant and Anthony C. Weagley, dated as of January 1, 1996 is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.
 
10.8
 
Employment agreement between the Registrant and Lori A. Wunder, dated as of January 1, 1999 is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
 
10.9
 
Change in Control Agreement between the Registrant and Charles E. Nunn, Jr., dated February 6, 2006, is incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2006.
 
10.10
 
Directors’ Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1998. 
10.11
 
Center Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1999.
 
10.12
 
Indenture between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company as debenture trustee for floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2031, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
 
10.13
 
The Registrant’s amended and restated declaration of Trust of Center Bancorp Statutory Trust 1, dated December 18, 2001 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
 
10.14
 
Guarantee agreement by Registrant and between Center Bancorp, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company of Connecticut, National Association, dated as of December 18, 2001 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
 
10.15
 
Registrant’s Placement Agreement dated December 12, 2003 with Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P. to issue and sell $5 million aggregate liquidation amount of floating rate MMCapS(SM) Securities is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
10.16
 
Indenture dated as of December 19, 2003, between the Registrant and Wilmington Trust Company relating to $5.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate debentures is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
10.17
 
Amended and restated Declaration of Trust of Center Bancorp Statutory Trust II, dated as of December 19, 2003 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
10.18
 
Guarantee agreement between Registrant and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of December 19, 2003 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
10.19
 
Senior Officer Protection Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
10.20
 
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated September 29, 2004, relating to a September 2004 private placement of securities, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2004.
 


23





10.21
 
Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 29, 2004, relating to securities issued in a September 2004 private placement of securities, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2004.
 
10.22
 
The Registrant’s 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to the Registrant’s proxy statement for its 2004 annual meeting of shareholders.
 
10.23
 
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Julie D’Aloia, dated as of January 1, 2001. Is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
10.24
 
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Mark S. Cardone, dated as of January 1, 2003, is incorporated by reference to exhibits 10.24 to the Registrants Annual Report o Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
10.25    
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 30, 2005, relating to a June 2005 private placement of securities, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2005.
 
10.26
Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 30, 2005, relating to securities issued in a June 2005 private placement of securities, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2005.
11.1
 
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings is omitted because the computation can be clearly determined from the material incorporated by reference in this Report.
 
13.1
 
Parts of Registrant’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
14.1
 
Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
21.1
 
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
 
23.1
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 
24.1
 
Power of Attorney.
 
31.1
 
Personal certification of the chief executive officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
31.2
 
Personal certification of the chief financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
32.1
 
Personal certification of the chief executive officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
32.2
 
Personal certification of the chief financial officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
99.1
 
Code of conduct is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 


24


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Center Bancorp Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
CENTER BANCORP, INC.
 
 
 Dated March 15, 2006
/s/ JOHN J. DAVIS
 
John J. Davis
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant, in the capacities described below on March xx, 2005.
/s/ ALEXANDER BOL *
 
/s/ HUGO BARTH, III *
Alexander A. Bol
 
Hugo Barth, III
Director and Chairman of the Board
 
Director
 
 
 
/s/ JOHN J. DAVIS
 
/s/ DONALD G. KEIN *
John J. Davis
 
Donald G. Kein
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
Director
and Director
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ JAMES J. KENNEDY *
 
/s/ HERBERT SCHILLER *
James J. Kennedy
 
Herbert Schiller
Director
 
Director
 
 
 
/s/ PAUL LOMAKIN, JR. *
 
/s/ NORMAN F. SCHROEDER *
Paul Lomakin, Jr.
 
Norman F. Schroeder
Director
 
Director
 
 
 
/s/ EUGENE V. MALINOWSKI *
 
/s/ BRENDA CURTIS *
Eugene V. Malinowski
 
Brenda Curtis
Director
 
Director
 
 
 
/s/ KENNETH W. BATTIATO*
 
/s/ STEPHEN  J. LaMONT*
Kenneth W. Battiato
 
Stephen J. LaMont
Director
 
Director
     
/s/ WILLIAM THOMPSON *
 
/s/ JOHN DeLANEY*
William Thompson
 
John DeLaney
Director
 
Director
 
 
 
* /s/ ANTHONY C. WEAGLEY
 
/s/ ANTHONY C. WEAGLEY
Anthony C. Weagley
 
Anthony C. Weagley
Attorney-in-Fact
 
Vice President & Treasurer (Chief Accounting and Financial Officer)



25

EX-10.9 2 v036625_ex10-9.htm Unassociated Document
 
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

This CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made on of this 6th day of February, 2006, effective as of the 3rd day of January, 2006, by and among UNION CENTER NATIONAL BANK, a bank chartered under the laws of Congress (the “Bank”), CENTER BANCORP INC., a New Jersey corporation that owns all of the capital stock of the Bank (the “Company”) and CHARLES E. NUNN, JR. (“Employee”).

BACKGROUND:

WHEREAS, Employee is currently employed as a Senior Vice President of the Bank and as a Vice President of the Company; and

WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of the Bank and the Company believe it is imperative that the Bank and the Company be able to rely upon Employee to continue in his position in the event that the Bank or the Company receives any proposal from a third person concerning a possible acquisition of the equity securities or assets of the Bank or the Company, and that the Bank and the Company be able to receive and rely upon Employee’s advice, if they request it, as to the best interests of the Company, the Bank and their respective shareholders, without concern that Employee might be distracted by the personal uncertainties and risks created by such a proposal; and

WHEREAS, to achieve that goal, and to retain Employee’s services prior to any such activity, the Bank, the Company and Employee have agreed to enter into this Agreement to govern Employee’s termination benefits in the event of a Change in Control Event (as defined below).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. Certain Definitions: As used in the Agreement, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:

(a) “Cause” means (i) Employee’s conviction of, guilty plea to, or confession of guilt of, any crime that constitutes a felony or criminal act involving moral turpitude, (ii) Employee’s commission of a fraudulent, illegal, disloyal or dishonest act in respect of the Bank or the Company, (iii) termination of the Bank’s business due to unprofitability, insolvency, bankruptcy or directive by governmental regulators, (iv) Employee’s willful misconduct or gross negligence that reasonably could be expected to be materially injurious to the business, operations, or reputation of the Bank and/or the Company, (v) Employee’s violation of a material nature of the Bank’s or the Company’s policies or procedures in effect from time to time; provided, however, to the extent such violation is subject to cure, such violation shall not constitute “Cause” unless Employee fails to cure such violation within 10 days after written notice thereof, (vi) Employee’s material failure to perform Employee’s duties as assigned to Employee by the Bank and/or the Company from time to time; provided, however, to the extent such failure is subject to cure, such failure shall not constitute “Cause” unless Employee fails to cure such failure within 10 days after written notice thereof, or (vii) Employee’s death.


Termination for “Cause” shall not be construed to include the takeover of the Bank or the Company, in either a hostile or voluntary manner, by another person, firm or corporation.

(b) “Change in Control Event” means (i) the consummation of an acquisition by a third party of a majority of the voting capital stock of the Company or the Bank or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the Bank or (ii) a change in the composition of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) such that the Continuing Directors (as hereinafter defined) no longer constitute a majority of the Board.

(c) “Continuing Directors” shall mean (i) each current member of the Company’s Board of Directors and (ii) each person who is hereinafter first nominated to such Board by unanimous vote of the persons who then constitute Continuing Directors.

(d) “Good Reason” means the resignation by Employee within 180 days after the occurrence of a Change in Control Event.

(e) “Release” means a general release agreement in a form acceptable to the Company and the Bank, which Release shall include, among other things, a general release of the Bank, the Company and related parties from all liability.

(f) “Trigger Event” shall mean, the occurrence during the Term (as defined below) of either: (i) the termination of Employee’s employment by the Bank and the Company (or their respective successors) upon, or within 12 months following, a Change in Control Event, other than a termination of Employee’s employment by the Bank and the Company (or their respective successors) for Cause; or (ii) Employee’s resignation for Good Reason, provided that Employee delivers written notice of Employee’s resignation to the Bank and the Company (or their respective successors ) at least 30 days prior to the effective date of such resignation.

2. Term of Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in the next sentence of this Section 2, the term of this Agreement shall be three (3) years, effective as of January 3, 2006 and terminating January 2, 2009 (the “Initial Term”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall automatically be extended (a) at the end of the Initial Term, for successive one year renewal terms unless, at least twelve-months prior to the commencement of any such renewal term, notice of termination of this Agreement is given by any party hereto to the other parties hereto and (b) if a Change in Control Event occurs at any time during the Initial Term or any such renewal term, for a period of one (1) year from the date of such Change in Control Event. The Initial Term, together with any renewal term, shall be referred to in this Agreement as the “Term.”

2

3. Trigger Event Payments and Benefits. Upon the occurrence of a Trigger Event (a) subject to Employee’s execution, delivery and non-revocation of the Release, Employee shall be entitled to: (i) a lump sum payment equal to the product of (x) three (3) and (y) the sum of (1) Employee’s annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to the Trigger Event, (2) the largest annual cash bonus received by Employee from the Bank and/or the Company in the 2 year period preceding the Trigger Event, (3) the amount recorded on Employee’s W-2 (for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the Trigger Event occurs) that is attributable to fringe benefits provided to Employee by the Bank and/or the Company, (4) the annual premium of Employee’s long-term care policy as in effect immediately preceding the Trigger Event (to the extent such amount is not recorded on Employee’s W-2 as attributable to fringe benefits), and (5) the maximum matching contribution that could have been made under the Bank’s 401(k) plan if Employee had remained employed by the Bank and the Company for an additional one (1) year following the Trigger Event (the “Trigger Event Payment”); and (ii) if Employee timely elects COBRA coverage and provided Employee continues to make contributions for such continuation coverage equal to Employee’s contribution amount in effect immediately preceding the date of Employee’s termination of employment, the Bank and/or the Company, as applicable, shall waive the remaining portion of Employee’s healthcare continuation payments under COBRA for an eighteen (18)-month period following the Trigger Event; and (b) all stock options granted to Employee by the Company shall be exercisable in full, effective as of the date of the Trigger Event. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that Employee becomes eligible to obtain alternate healthcare coverage from a new employer before the 18-month anniversary of the Trigger Event, the Bank’s and/or the Company’s obligation to waive the remaining portion of Employee’s healthcare continuation coverage under COBRA shall cease. Employee understands and affirms that Employee is obligated to inform the Bank and the Company if Employee becomes eligible to obtain alternate healthcare coverage from a new employer before the 18-month anniversary of the Trigger Event. The Trigger Event Payment (less applicable withholdings and deductions) shall be paid to Employee in a lump sum on the next regular payroll date following the 8th day after Employee’s execution and delivery of the Release; provided, however, that if necessary to comply with the restriction in Section 409A(a)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) concerning payments to “specified employees,” the Trigger Event Payment shall be made on the first business day of the seventh month following the Trigger Event. Employee shall have no obligation to seek substitute employment or otherwise mitigate the Bank’s and the Company’s obligations to make the payments set forth in this Section 3.

4. Taxes. In the event that either the Company's independent public accountants or the Internal Revenue Service determines that any payment, coverage or benefit provided to Employee is subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 (or any successor provision) of the Code (“Section 4999”), the Company and the Bank shall pay to Employee, on the later of the 30th day thereafter (or the first business day following such 30th day) or the date that the Trigger Event Payment is paid pursuant to Section 3 above, in addition to any other payment, coverage or benefit due and owing hereunder, an amount determined by multiplying the rate of excise tax then imposed by Section 4999 by the amount of the “excess parachute payment” received by Employee (determined without regard to any payments made to Employee pursuant to this Section 4) and dividing the product so obtained by the amount obtained by subtracting the aggregate local, state and Federal income tax rate applicable to the receipt by Employee of the "excess parachute payment" (taking into account the deductibility for Federal income tax purposes of the payment of state and local income taxes thereon) from the amount obtained by subtracting from 1.00 the rate of excise tax then imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, it being the intention of the parties hereto that Employee's net after tax position be identical to that which would have obtained had Sections 28OG and 4999 not been part of the Code.

3

5. At Will Employment. This Agreement shall not affect any rights of the Bank, the Company or the Employee prior to a Change in Control Event or any of your rights granted in any other agreement, plan or arrangements, except that if Employee receive all payments under this Agreement, Employee shall not be entitled to receive any payments or benefits under any other severance arrangement (if any) with the Bank or the Company. The rights, duties and benefits provided under this Agreement only shall become effective upon a Change in Control Event. Nothing in this Agreement shall alter Employee’s status as an “at-will” employee. If Employee’s employment by the Bank and/or the Company is terminated for any reason prior to a Change in Control Event, this Agreement shall thereafter be of no further force and effect

6. Headings. Headings used in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and do not affect the meaning of any provision.

7. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed as of the same effective date in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.

8. Binding Agreement; Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

9. Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This Agreement and any and all matters arising directly or indirectly herefrom shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of New Jersey, without reference to the choice of law principles thereof. Any legal action, suit or other proceeding arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement shall be brought in the courts of the State of New Jersey, or in the United States courts for the District of New Jersey. With respect to any such proceeding in any such court: (i) each party generally and unconditionally submits itself and its property to the exclusive jurisdiction of such court (and corresponding appellate courts therefrom), and (ii) each party waives, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any objection it has or hereafter may have the venue of such proceeding as well as any claim that it has or may have that such proceeding is in an inconvenient forum.

10. Amendments. This Agreement may only be amended or otherwise modified, and the provisions hereof may only be waived, by a writing executed by the parties hereto.

11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters covered hereby and shall supersede all previous written, oral or implied understandings between them with respect to such matters. Without limitation, this Agreement supercedes and replaces the provisions set forth in the third and fourth paragraphs of the offer letter dated February 23, 2004 from the Bank to the Employee.

12. Opportunity to Consult Counsel. Employee hereby acknowledges that he has read and fully understands this Agreement, that he has been advised that Lowenstein Sandler PC is counsel to the Bank and the Company and not to Employee, and that Employee has been advised to, and has had the opportunity to, consult with counsel and Employee’s personal financial or tax advisor with respect to this Agreement.
 
4

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

     
  UNION CENTER NATIONAL BANK
 
 
 
 
 
 
  By:   /s/ John J. Davis
 

Name: John J. Davis
Title: President & Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 6, 2006 
 
     
  CENTER BANCORP INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  By:   /s/ John J. Davis
 

Name: John J. Davis
Title: President & Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 6, 2006

WITNESS:      EMPLOYEE:
       
/s/ Julie D’Aloia     /s/ Charles E. Nunn Jr.

Name: Julie D’Aloia 
Date: February 6, 2006
   

Name: Charles E. Nunn, Jr.
Date: February 6, 2006
 
5

EX-13.1 3 v036625ex13.htm Unassociated Document
[v036625ex13001.jpg]
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
2005
 
2004
 
Percent Change
 
                     
Net Interest Income
     
$
27,207
     
$
26,081
     
  
4.32
 
Provision for Loan Losses
     
 
     
 
752
     
 
(100.00)
 
Total other income, including gain on securities sold
     
 
3,836
     
 
3,388
     
 
13.22
 
Gain on Securities Sold
     
 
350
     
 
148
     
 
136.49
 
Other Expenses
     
 
22,213
     
 
19,471
     
 
14.08
 
Net Income
     
 
7,646
     
 
7,622
     
 
0.31
 
Cash Dividends Declared
     
 
4,518
     
 
3,238
     
 
39.53
 
Per Share Data
     
   
     
   
     
     
Net Income
     
   
     
   
     
     
Basic
     
$
0.63
     
$
0.79
     
 
(20.25
)
Diluted
     
$
0.63
     
 
0.78
     
 
(19.23
)
Cash Dividends Paid
     
 
0.36
     
 
0.34
     
 
5.88
 
Book Value
     
 
7.41
     
 
6.59
     
 
12.44
 
Tangible Book Value
     
 
6.11
     
 
6.39
     
 
(4.38
)

At Year End:
                 
Market Value
 
Bid
 
Ask
 
Bid
 
Ask
 
Per common share
        
$
10.92
     
$
10.96
     
$
12.49
     
$
12.52
 

At Year End:
     
   
     
   
     
     
Investment Securities
     
$
528,684
     
$
577,686
     
 
(8.48
)
Loans
     
 
505,826
     
 
377,304
     
 
34.06
 
Assets
     
 
1,114,829
     
 
1,009,015
     
 
10.49
 
Deposits
     
 
700,601
     
 
702,272
     
 
(0.24
)
Borrowings
     
 
293,963
     
 
216,357
     
 
35.87
 
Subordinated Debentures
     
 
15,465
     
 
15,465
     
 
0.00
 
Stockholders’ Equity
     
 
99,489
     
 
68,643
     
 
44.94
 
Shares Outstanding
     
 
13,431,628
     
 
10,418,474
     
 
28.92
 
Financial Ratios
     
   
     
   
     
     
Return on average assets
     
 
0.69
%   
 
0.81
%   
     
Return on average stockholders’ equity
     
 
8.91
%   
 
13.17
%   
     
Return on tangible average stockholders’ equity
     
 
10.32
%   
 
13.67
%   
     
Cash dividend declared as a percent of net income
     
 
59.09
%   
 
42.48
%   
     
Stockholders’ equity as a percent of tangible assets
     
 
8.92
%   
 
6.80
%   
     
Tangible stockholders’ equity as a percent of tangible assets
   
7.47
   
6.61
%
     
Risk Based Tier I Capital Ratio
     
 
15.51
%   
 
14.03
%   
     
Risk Based Tier I and Tier II Capital Ratio       
     
 
16.26
%   
 
14.68
%   
     
Tier I Leverage Ratio
     
 
9.07
%   
 
8.22
%   
     



18


SUMMARY OF SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL DATA
   
Years Ended December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
                                 
Summary of Income
                               
Interest income
     
$
50,503
     
$
40,049
     
$
35,919
     
$
40,469
     
$
38,369
 
Interest expense
     
 
23,296
     
 
13,968
     
 
12,726
     
 
14,522
     
 
16,007
 
Net interest income
     
 
27,207
     
 
26,081
     
 
23,193
     
 
25,947
     
 
22,362
 
Provision for loan losses
     
 
     
 
752
     
 
522
     
 
360
     
 
656
 
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses
     
 
27,207
     
 
25,329
     
 
22,671
     
 
25,587
     
 
21,706
 
Other income
     
 
3,836
     
 
3,388
     
 
3,247
     
 
3,335
     
 
2,488
 
Other expense
     
 
22,213
     
 
19,471
     
 
18,336
     
 
17,198
     
 
15,216
 
Income before income tax expense
     
 
8,830
     
 
9,246
     
 
7,582
     
 
11,724
     
 
8,978
 
Income tax expense
     
 
1,184
     
 
1,624
     
 
1,163
     
 
3,721
     
 
2,967
 
Net income
     
$
7,646
     
$
7,622
     
$
6,419
     
$
8,003
     
$
6,011
 
Statement of Financial Condition Data
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     
Investments
     
$
528,684
     
$
577,686
     
$
519,234
     
$
537,619
     
$
417,274
 
Total loans
     
 
505,826
     
 
377,304
     
 
349,525
     
 
229,051
     
 
211,236
 
Total assets
     
 
1,114,829
     
 
1,009,015
     
 
922,289
     
 
823,436
     
 
689,603
 
Deposits
     
 
700,601
     
 
702,272
     
 
632,921
     
 
616,351
     
 
497,833
 
Borrowings
     
 
293,963
     
 
216,357
     
 
214,724
     
 
140,431
     
 
132,296
 
Stockholders’ equity
     
$
99,489
     
$
68,643
     
$
54,180
     
$
51,054
     
$
44,296
 
Dividends
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     
Cash dividends
     
$
4,518
     
$
3,238
     
$
3,014
     
$
2,747
     
$
2,338
 
Dividend payout ratio
     
 
59.09
%   
 
42.48
%   
 
46.95
%   
 
34.32
%   
 
38.89
%
Cash Dividends Per Share
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     
Cash dividends
     
$
0.36
     
$
0.34
     
$
0.32
     
$
0.31
     
$
0.27
 
Earnings Per Share
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     
Basic
     
$
0.63
     
$
0.79
     
$
0.69
     
$
0.86
     
$
0.66
 
Diluted
     
$
0.63
     
$
0.78
     
$
0.68
     
$
0.86
     
$
0.65
 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     
Basic
     
 
12,074,870
     
 
9,679,880
     
 
9,344,122
     
 
9,253,814
     
 
9,121,604
 
Diluted
     
 
12,119,291
     
 
9,737,706
     
 
9,441,972
     
 
9,328,213
     
 
9,197,624
 
Operating Ratios
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     
Return on average assets
     
 
0.69
%   
 
0.81
%   
 
0.74
%   
 
1.07
%   
 
0.99
%
Average stockholders’ equity to average assets
     
 
7.79
%   
 
6.14
%   
 
5.96
%   
 
6.46
%   
 
7.02
%
Return on tangible average equity
     
 
10.32
%   
 
13.67
%   
 
12.87
%   
 
17.33
%   
 
14.86
%
Book Value
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     
Book value per common share
     
$
7.41
     
$
6.59
     
$
5.77
     
$
5.50
     
$
4.83
 
Tangible book value per common share
     
$
6.11
     
$
6.39
     
$
5.54
     
$
5.27
     
$
4.60
 
Non-Financial Information
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
   
     
     
Common stockholders of record
     
 
767
     
 
529
     
 
527
     
 
542
     
 
543
 
Staff-Full time equivalent
     
 
202
     
 
192
     
 
191
     
 
182
     
 
172
 



19


[v036625ex13002.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies followed by Center Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) conform, in all material respects, to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated statements of condition and results of operations for the periods indicated. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
The Corporation’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of financial condition and results of operations. The most significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Corporation has identified its policies on the allowance for loan losses and income tax liabilities to be critical because management has to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. Additional information on these policies can be found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the second largest asset type on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.
The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses includes among other factors, an analysis of historical loss rates by loan category applied to current loan totals. However, actual loan losses may be higher or lower than historical trends which vary. Actual losses on specified problem loans, which also are provided for in the evaluation, may vary from estimated loss percentages, which are established based upon a limited number of potential loss classifications. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Management believes that the current allowance for loan losses will be adequate to absorb loan losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based on the evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. The evaluation takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and size of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, specific problem loans and current economic conditions which may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay. The evaluation also details historical losses by loan category, the resulting loan loss rates which are projected for current loan total amounts. Loss estimates for specified problem loans are also detailed. All of the factors considered in the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses may be subject to change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses may be required that would adversely impact earnings in future periods. Additional information can be found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could impact the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Notes 1 and 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements include additional discussion on the accounting for income taxes.
The Company accounts for goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and intangible assets.” SFAS No. 142 includes requirements to test goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment rather than amortize them. The company has tested the goodwill as of December 31, 2005, and has determined that it is not impaired.


20


Introduction
The following introduction to Management’s Discussion and Analysis highlights the principal factors that contributed to the Corporation’s earnings performance in 2005.
While profitability remained consistent in 2005 as compared with the results achieved in 2004, the Corporation reported earnings in 2005 that continued to reflect positive trends in performance results and core growth in market share, principally the growth of our loan portfolio. The Corporation achieved net growth in loan volume on average of 24.45 percent for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005. We continued to take strategic action in protecting our net interest margin, despite the challenges presented by the rise in rates coupled with a flattening of the yield curve. We maintained credit quality, sustained growth in our non-interest revenue and grew our average core deposits.
Earnings performance in 2005 remained positive despite the challenges resulting from the continuation of the tightening cycle which resulted in the Federal Reserve raising rates 200 basis points over the prior twelve months, continued economic uncertainty, a competitive market environment and an increase of 14.08 percent in operating overhead. The increased operating overhead was primarily related to additional salaries and employee benefits associated with our acquisition of Red Oak Bank in May 2005 and expanded bank premises.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, net income increased 0.31 percent to $7,646,000 or $0.63 per diluted share, as compared to $7,622,000 or $0.78 per diluted share earned for the year ended December 31, 2004. Strong interest-earning asset growth in the loan portfolio helped to mitigate the effects of interest rate pressure, with loans at December 31, 2005 increasing $128.5 million to a record year-end level of $505.8 million (up 34.06 percent over the prior year-end).
The loan growth was due in part to the acquisition of Red Oak Bank which contributed $89.6 million in net loans. Additional growth in the loan portfolios has been fueled by strong demand for commercial, commercial real-estate and residential mortgage loans. A strong commercial real estate and residential housing market prevailed throughout the year in our market in New Jersey, despite the uncertain economic climate at both the state and national levels. We are encouraged by the strength of loan demand and positive momentum gained this past year in growing that segment of earning-assets.
Asset quality continues to remain high and credit culture conservative. During 2005, the Corporation did not add any provision to the allowance for loan losses. The Corporation did, however, add $1,210,000 in existing loan loss reserves as a result of the acquisition of Red Oak Bank in May 2005. At December 31, 2005, the total allowance for loan and lease losses amounted to 0.98 percent of total loans.
The Corporation completed the acquisition of Red Oak Bank as of the close of business on May 20, 2005. Red Oak Bank was a State chartered commercial bank which operated one full service branch location in Morristown, Morris County, New Jersey. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, 50% of Red Oak Bank’s common stock was converted into Center Bancorp, Inc. common stock at an exchange rate of .9227 of the Corporation’s shares per each Red Oak Bank share and 50% was converted into $12.06 in cash. The aggregate consideration paid in the merger consisted of $13.3 million in cash and 1,015,816 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The cash portion of the merger consideration was funded through the sale of securities available for sale and cash from continuing operations. The Corporation additionally converted remaining stock options covering 56,266 shares of Red Oak Bank common stock outstanding at the time of the merger. These options were exchanged for options covering 54,514 shares of Center Bancorp, Inc. common stock.
The ability to acquire a local community bank located in such an attractive market as Morristown, New Jersey served to strengthen the Corporation’s existing presence in that market in 2005 and further allowed the Corporation to remain dedicated to our focus of quality service in each of our local markets, which has been the cornerstone to our success for over 81 years. The acquisition of Red Oak Bank also provided the Corporation with the strategic opportunity to enhance shareholder value, market share and earnings growth. The acquisition served to increase the Corporation’s loan portfolio, and provide opportunities to further expand existing business relationships as well as to develop new ones in the affluent and desirable business areas of the Morris County marketplace, which compliments the Corporation’s existing footprint in that market. We were additionally able to increase our core deposit funding base, as well as enhance the Corporation’s opportunities for earning asset generation.


21


[v036625ex13003.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
The geographic expansion of the Corporation into desirable markets, such as Morristown, increasing its presence in Morris County, New Jersey over the past several years, has contributed to the growth in market share, as well as increased loan demand and growth in deposits. The Corporation expects its Boonton/Mountain Lakes office to open in the latter part of the third quarter of 2006. Additional expansion plans include new branch locations in Cranford, New Jersey and Florham Park, New Jersey. This expansion is expected to enhance the Corporation’s ability to continue to grow and expand its product lines for future success.
Deposit growth was strong in 2005. The growth in average deposits was reflected in core interest-bearing accounts, time and demand deposits. At December 31, 2005, total deposits for the Corporation were $700.6 million. Non-interest-bearing core deposits, a low-cost source of funding, continue to be a key-funding source. At December 31, 2005, this source of funding amounted to $139.9 million or 13.85 percent of total funding sources and 19.97 percent of total deposits. More volatile rate sensitive deposits, principally certificates of deposits $100,000 and greater, decreased to 22.04 percent of total deposits at December 31, 2005 from 23.33 percent one year earlier. For the year 2005, average interest-earning assets grew $148.1 million or 16.84 percent over the comparable twelve-month period ended December 31, 2004. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $123.4 million, an increase of 16.45 percent over the comparable period in 2004.
Total non-interest revenue increased as a percentage of total revenue in 2005. This revenue, exclusive of gains on securities sold (which increased $202,000 during 2005), increased $246,000 or 7.59 percent in 2005 as compared with 2004. The change from the comparable period in 2004 was driven primarily by the $134,000 or 227.12% increase in annuity and insurance sales and by a $132,000 or 26.45 percent increase in fees generated by lending activities included in other income. This amount includes loan fees and mortgage banking fees and letter of credit fees. Other contributing factors to the increase in 2005 in other income were an increase in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance, which increased by $6,000 over the comparable period in 2004. Service charges, commissions and fees decreased by $26,000 from 2004.
Operating expenses for the year increased 14.08 percent, primarily from an increase in salary and benefit expenses related to increased staffing levels, merit and promotional pay increases and certain employee related expenses coupled with expenses related to expanded bank premises.
Total assets at December 31, 2005, were $1.1 billion, an increase of 10.49 percent from assets of $1.0 billion at December 31, 2004. Annualized returns on average assets for the year ended December 31, 2005 was 0.69 percent compared to 0.81 percent for 2004.
Total stockholders’ equity increased 44.94 percent over 2004 to $99.5 million, and represented 8.92 percent of total assets at year-end. Book value per common share (total stockholders’ equity divided by the number of shares outstanding) increased to $7.41 as compared with $6.59 a year ago as a result of the issuance of stock for the acquisition of Red Oak Bank and private placement of common stock, and change in other comprehensive income. Tangible book value (which excludes goodwill and other intangibles from stockholders’ equity) decreased to $6.11 from $6.30 a year ago. Return on average stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2005 was 8.91 percent compared to 13.17 percent for 2004. This decrease in return was primarily attributable to additional shares issued in June 2005, May 2005 and September 2004. The Tier I Leverage capital ratio increased to 9.07 percent of total assets at December 31, 2005, as compared with 8.22 percent at December 31, 2004.
A key element of the Corporation’s consistent performance is its strong capital base. Our consolidated statement of condition reflects $15.5 million in subordinated debentures as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. The most recent issuance of $5.0 million in floating rate MMCapS(SM) Securities occurred on December 19, 2003. The Corporation has used the net proceeds of this issuance for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including capital contributions to the Company’s banking subsidiary to support its growth strategies. These securities presently are included as a component of Tier I capital for regulatory capital purposes. In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46, these securities are classified as subordinated debentures on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.


22


The Corporation’s risk-based capital ratios at December 31, 2005 were 15.51 percent for Tier I capital and 16.26 percent for total risk-based capital. These ratios substantially exceed the regulatory minimum of 4 percent for Tier I capital and 8 percent for total capital under regulatory guidelines. Total Tier 1 capital increased to approximately $102.2 million at December 31, 2005 from $81.5 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in Tier 1 capital reflects the acquisition of Red Oak Bank and the issuance of 1,904,761 shares of the holding company’s common stock to a limited number of accredited investors in a private placement of its securities on June 30, 2005. The shares were issued at a purchase price of $10.50 per share. Net proceeds to the holding company were approximately $18.9 million, after commissions and expenses.
From a performance viewpoint, return on tangible average shareholders’ equity was 10.32 percent in 2005, compared with 13.67 percent for 2004 and 12.87 percent in 2003.
The Corporation announced a common stock buyback program on January 24, 2002, under which the Corporation was authorized to purchase up to 266,254 shares (restated to reflect the 5 percent common stock dividend distributed on June 1, 2002, the two-for one common stock split distributed on June 2, 2003, 5 percent common stock dividend distributed June 1, 2004 and 5 percent common stock dividend distributed June 15, 2005) of Center Bancorp’s outstanding common stock. Under the program, repurchases may be made from time to time as, in the opinion of management, market conditions warrant, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2005 the Corporation has repurchased 57,330 shares under the program at an average cost of $9.38 per share.
Non-historical statements set forth in this Annual Report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements include expressions about management’s confidence and strategies and management’s expectations about new and existing programs and products, relationships, opportunities, technology and market conditions. These statements may use such forward-looking terminology as “expect”, “look”, “believe”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “may”, “will” or similar statements or variations of such terms or otherwise express views concerning trends and the future. Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. These include, but are not limited to, the direction of interest rates, continued levels of loan quality, origination volume, the impact of competition and continued relationships with major customers including sources for loans, the effects of economic conditions and legal and regulatory barriers and structure, including those relating to the deregulation of the financial services industry, and other risks we have described in documents that we have filed with the SEC. Actual results could differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Center Bancorp, Inc. assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements at any time.
The following sections discuss the Corporation’s Results of Operations, Asset and Liability Management, Liquidity and Capital Resource.
Results of Operations
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $7,646,000 as compared to $7,622,000 earned in 2004 and $6,419,000 earned in 2003. Net income increased by 0.31 percent, while basic earnings per share decreased by 20.25 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2005. Earnings per share fully diluted decreased by 19.23 percent compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. The decline in the Corporation’s earnings per share in 2005 as compared to 2004 resulted from the additional shares outstanding due to the acquisition of Red Oak Bank and issuance of common shares in private placements on September 29, 2004 and June 30, 2005. This compared to increases of 18.74 percent, 14.49 percent and 14.71 percent, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. All common share and per share information for all periods presented have been retroactively restated for common stock splits and common stock dividends distributed to common stockholders during the periods presented.
The return on average assets was 0.69 percent for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared with 0.81 percent for 2004 and 0.74 percent for 2003, while the return on tangible average stockholders’ equity was 10.32 percent, 13.67 percent and 12.87 percent, respectively.
Earnings performance for the year ended December 31, 2005, reflected continued adherence to the Corporation’s strategic initiatives. These initiatives are designed to sharpen our business focus and strengthen our financial performance, emphasizing the importance of core relationship business and a conservative credit culture. Earnings for the year were consistent with 2004 and reflect a higher level of interest-earning assets, gains in non-interest revenue, no provision for loan losses and a reduction in income tax expense. This was offset in part by an increase in non-interest expense and an increase in interest expense associated with the rise in interest-bearing liabilities.


23


[v036625ex13004.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
Net Interest Income
The most significant component of Center Bancorp’s earnings is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest earned in the portfolio of earning-assets (principally loans and investments) and the interest paid for deposits and borrowings, which support these assets. There were several factors that affected net interest income during 2005, including the volume, pricing, mix and maturity of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and interest rate fluctuations.
The following table presents the components of net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) for the past three years.
 
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
 
 
   
Increase
         
Increase
         
Increase
   
 
 
 
   
(Decrease)
         
(Decrease)
         
(Decrease)
   
 
 
 
   
From
         
From
         
From
   
 
 
 
   
Prior
 
Percent
     
Prior
 
Percent
     
Prior
 
Percent
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Year
 
Change
 
Amount
 
Year
 
Change
 
Amount
 
Year
 
Change
 
                                       
Interest income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments
 
$
27,690
    
$
4,206
    
 
17.91
    
$
23,484
    
$
1,260
    
 
5.67
    
$
22,224
    
$
(3,629
)    
 
(14.04
)
Loans, including fees
 
 
25,329
 
 
6,800
 
 
36.70
 
 
18,529
 
 
3,398
 
 
22.46
 
 
15,131
 
 
251
 
 
1.69
 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement
to resell
 
 
29
 
 
29
 
 
100.00
 
 
 
 
 
 
0.00
 
 
 
 
(59
)
 
(100.00
)
Total interest income
 
 
53,048
 
 
11,035
 
 
26.27
 
 
42,013
 
 
4,658
 
 
12.47
 
 
37,355
 
 
(3,437
)
 
(8.43
)
Interest expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certificates $100,000 or more
 
 
3,828
 
 
2,550
 
 
199.53
 
 
1,278
 
 
817
 
 
177.22
 
 
461
 
 
(11
)
 
(2.33
)
Deposits
 
 
7,771
 
 
1,634
 
 
26.63
 
 
6,137
 
 
(575
)
 
(8.57
)
 
6,712
 
 
(2,037
)
 
(23.28
)
Borrowings
 
 
11,697
 
 
5,144
 
 
78.50
 
 
6,553
 
 
1,000
 
 
18.01
 
 
5,553
 
 
252
 
 
4.75
 
Total interest expense
 
 
23,296
 
 
9,328
 
 
66.78
 
 
13,968
 
 
1,242
 
 
9.76
 
 
12,726
 
 
(1,796
)
 
(12.37
)
Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis
 
 
29,752
 
 
1,707
 
 
6.09
 
 
28,045
 
 
3,416
 
 
13.87
 
 
24,629
 
 
(1,641
)
 
(6.25
)
Tax-equivalent adjustment
 
 
(2,545
)
 
(581
)
 
29.58
 
 
(1,964
)
 
(528
)
 
36.77
 
 
(1,436
)
 
(1,113
)
 
344.58
 
Net interest income
 
$
27,207
 
$
1,126
 
 
4.32
 
$
26,081
 
$
2,888
 
 
12.45
 
$
23,193
 
$
(2,754
)
 
(10.61
)
NOTE: The tax-equivalent adjustment was computed based on an assumed statutory Federal income tax rate of 34 percent. Adjustments were made for interest earned on securities of state and political subdivisions.
Net interest income is directly affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which support those assets, as well as changes in the rates earned and paid. Net interest income is presented in this financial review on a tax equivalent basis by adjusting tax-exempt income (primarily interest earned on various obligations of state and political subdivisions) by the amount of income tax which would have been paid had the assets been invested in taxable issues, and then in accordance with the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the net interest income data presented in this financial review differ from the Corporation’s net interest income components of the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere in this report.
Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased $1.7 million or 6.09 percent, from $28.0 million for 2004. The Corporation’s net interest margin decreased 30 basis points to 2.89 percent from 3.19 percent.
The change in net interest income was primarily attributable to the change that occurred in the interest rate environment that impacted financial institutions during 2005. An 81 basis point increase in the average interest rates paid on total interest-bearing liabilities was offset partly by a 39 basis point increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets from 4.77 percent in 2004 to 5.16 percent for 2005. The change in average yield on both interest-


24


earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reflected the increase in interest rates that occurred in 2005 as opposed to the prevailing lower interest rate environment that persisted in 2004.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, interest-earning assets increased by $148.1 million on average to $1.0 billion, as compared with an $880.0 million average volume for the year ended December 31, 2004. The 2005 change in average interest-earning asset volume was primarily due to increased volumes of loans and investment securities which were funded in part with more expensive interest-bearing liabilities, principally higher rate time deposit products such as Certificates of Deposit, coupled with increased volumes of other borrowings.
The factors underlying the year-to-year changes in net interest income are reflected in the tables presented below and on page 48, each of which have been presented on a tax-equivalent basis (assuming a 34 percent tax rate). The table on page 48 (Average Statements of Condition with Interest and Average Rates) shows the Corporation’s consolidated average balance of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity, the amount of income produced from interest-earning assets and the amount of expense incurred from interest-bearing liabilities, and net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
Net Interest Margin
The following table quantifies the impact on net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) resulting from changes in average balances and average rates over the past three years. Any change in interest income or expense attributable to both changes in volume and changes in rate has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of change in each category.
Analysis of Variance in Net Interest Income Due to Volume and Rates
 
 
 
2005/2004
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in: 
 
 
2004/2003
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in: 
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
Average
Volume
 
 
Average
Rate
 
 
Net
Change
 
 
Average
Volume
 
 
Average
Rate
 
 
Net
Change
 
                                       
Interest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxable
 
$
796
    
$
1,235
    
$
2,031
    
$
(2,329
)    
$
1,901
    
$
(428
)
Non-Taxable
 
 
2,152
 
 
23
 
 
2,175
 
 
2,024
 
 
(336
)
 
1,688
 
Loans, net of unearned discounts
 
 
4,848
 
 
1,952
 
 
6,800
 
 
4,564
 
 
(1,166
)
 
3,398
 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreement to resell
 
 
29
 
 
 
 
29
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest-earning assets
 
 
7,825
 
 
3,210
 
 
11,035
 
 
4,259
 
 
399
 
 
4,658
 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market deposits
 
 
(23
)
 
1,008
 
 
985
 
 
5
 
 
(51
)
 
(46
)
Savings deposits
 
 
(278
)
 
520
 
 
242
 
 
(165
)
 
(344
)
 
(509
)
Time deposits
 
 
1,286
 
 
920
 
 
2,206
 
 
840
 
 
(161
)
 
679
 
Other interest-bearing deposits
 
 
353
 
 
398
 
 
751
 
 
39
 
 
79
 
 
118
 
Borrowings and subordinated debentures
 
 
1,761
 
 
3,383
 
 
5,144
 
 
836
 
 
164
 
 
1,000
 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
 
3,099
 
 
6,229
 
 
9,328
 
 
1,555
 
 
(313
)
 
1,242
 
Change in net interest income
 
$
4,726
 
$
(3,019
)
$
1,707
 
$
2,704
 
$
712
 
$
3,416
 
Interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased by approximately $11.0 million or 26.27 percent as compared with the year ended December 31, 2004. This increase primarily reflects an increase in the level and mix of average earning assets. The increase in the volume of average interest-earning assets was funded in part funded through cash flow from the addition of Red Oak Bank and proceeds from the private placements completed on June 30, 2005 and on September 29, 2004. The change in mix in 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily related to the $89.3 million increase in average loans, from $365.1 million in 2004 to $454.4 million in 2005, and to a lesser extent by a $39.9 million increase in average non-taxable investment securities, from $110.2 million in 2004 to $150.1 million in 2005. The average yield on interest-earning assets increased from 4.77 percent in 2004 to 5.16 percent in 2005. The loan portfolio represented approximately 44.19 percent of average interest-earning assets in 2005 as compared with 41.49 percent in 2004. The increase in interest-earning assets for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, also included $59.6 million in average interest-earning assets acquired in the purchase of Red Oak Bank.


25


[v036625ex13005.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
The increase in the volume of loans primarily reflected increases in commercial loans and mortgages and residential mortgage loans. This increase in loans and the increase in investment securities were principally funded by increased levels of high yield interest-bearing savings deposits, time deposits, and borrowings. The increase in average yield on total interest-earning assets contributed $3.2 million to the increase in interest income, as compared with a $7.8 million increase attributable to volume increases in interest-earning assets.
Interest income (fully tax-equivalent) increased by $4.7 million from 2003 to 2004 primarily due to an increase in the volume of average interest-earning assets. The yield contributed $399,000 and the loan and investment security volumes added $4.3 million to the increase in interest income for the period.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased as a result of volume and rate related factors. Rates and volumes increased on interest-bearing demand deposits, time deposits and short-term borrowings in 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2005, interest expense increased $9.3 million or 66.78 percent as compared with 2004. Interest-bearing liabilities increased on average $123.4 million, primarily in time deposits, interest-bearing demand and short-term borrowings. The growth in average volume contributed $3.1 million to the change in cost, while the increase in rates on interest-bearing liabilities contributed $6.2 million to the increase in interest expense for 2005.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased primarily as a result of growth in the volume of time deposits and short-term borrowings. For the year ended December 31, 2004, interest expense increased $1.2 million or 9.76 percent as compared with 2003. Interest-bearing liabilities increased on average $55.8 million, primarily in time deposits and short-term borrowings. The increase in the volume of interest-bearing liabilities contributed $1.6 million to the increase in interest expense, offset in part by the decline in average rates.
The Corporation’s net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis (i.e., the average yield on average interest-earning assets, calculated on a tax equivalent basis, minus the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities) decreased 42 basis points to 2.49 percent in 2005 from 2.91 percent for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease reflected a compression of spreads between yields earned on loans and investments and rates paid for supporting funds. During 2005, spreads narrowed due in part to monetary policy promulgated by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee increasing the target Federal Funds Rate to 4.25 percent from 2.25 percent at December 31, 2004 coupled with the flattening of the yield curve.
The Federal Reserve increased rates eight times during 2005 for a total of 200 basis points and increased rates five times in 2004 for 125 basis points. The net interest spread increased 13 basis points in 2004 as compared with 2003, primarily as a result of the Federal Funds Rate increasing to 2.25 percent during 2004 from a 44-year low of 1.00 percent at June 29, 2004.
The cost of total average interest-bearing liabilities increased to 2.67 percent, a change of 81 basis points, for the year ended December 31, 2005, from 1.86 percent for the year ended December 31, 2004 which followed a change of three basis points from 1.83 percent for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The contribution of non-interest-bearing sources (i.e., the differential between the average rate paid on all sources of funds and the average rate paid on interest-bearing sources) increased to 37 basis points, an increase of 10 basis points from 2004 to 2005. During the comparable periods of 2004 and 2003, there was an increase of one basis point to 27 basis points on average from 26 basis points on average during the year ended December 31, 2003.
Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2005, the average volume of investment securities increased by $57.8 million to approximately $572.7 million or 55.70 percent of average earning assets, as compared to 2004. At December 31, 2005, the total investment portfolio amounted to $528.7 million, a decrease of $49.0 million from December 31, 2004. The larger size of the investment portfolio on average during 2005 largely reflected the implementation of the Corporation’s strategies during 2005, which resulted in increased volumes of shorter maturity securities, which subsequently matured during the fourth quarter of 2005. At December 31, 2005, the principal components of the


26


investment portfolio are U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government Agency Obligations, Federal Agency Obligations including Mortgage-backed securities, Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivision, corporate bonds and notes, and other debt securities.
The tax-equivalent yield on investments increased by 28 basis points to 4.84 percent from a yield of 4.56 percent during the year ended December 31, 2004. The 28 basis points increase in the tax equivalent yield in investments was attributable to a higher interest rate environment in 2005, coupled with a change in mix in the portfolio to higher yielding tax-free securities. There was some portfolio extension where risk is relatively minimal within the portfolio, resulting in wider spreads, specifically with tax-free municipal securities added to the portfolio during 2005. This favorably impacted the change in portfolio yield, as compared with 2004. Higher interest rates also prevailed during most of 2005. The yield on the portfolio benefited by the impact of the higher interest rate environment on purchases made to replace securities, which had matured, were prepaid, or were called. The volume related factors during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005 increased revenue by $2.9 million, while rate related changes caused an increase in revenue of $1.3 million.
The impact of repricing activity on investment yields was also favorably impacted by the change in rates during 2005, due to the fact that a large percentage of the increased volume on average during 2005 was invested into shorter maturities and repriced into a higher rate environment during the year. The cash flow from the sale of investment securities was in part invested back into the portfolio.
Securities available-for-sale is a part of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, liquidity management and other factors. During 2005 approximately $59.4 million in securities were sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio, a portion of which funded increases in loan volume and a portion of which reduced the volume of short-term borrowings.
At December 31, 2005 the net unrealized loss carried as a component of other comprehensive income and included in shareholders’ equity, net of tax, amounted to a net unrealized loss of $4.4 million as compared with a net unrealized gain of $584,000 at December 31, 2004, resulting from an increase in interest rates fostered by the Federal Open Market Committee’s actions to continue to increase the Federal Funds target rate as an economic stimulus. For additional information regarding the Corporation’s investment portfolio, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans
Loan growth during 2005 occurred in all principal categories of the loan portfolio. At December 31, 2005 total loans amounted to $505.8 million, an increase of 34.06 percent or $128.5 million as compared to the comparable year-end in 2004. Loan growth during the year ended December 31, 2004 occurred primarily in residential mortgage loans and in the commercial loan portfolio. The Red Oak Bank merger in May 2005 contributed $89.6 million to the mix and net growth of the loan portfolio. Growth also resulted from the Corporation’s business development efforts, heightened visibility of its products and aggressive marketing campaigns on its home equity, 7/1 adjustable rate residential mortgage and 10-year residential mortgage loan products. The increase in the loan portfolio yields for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, was the result of the increase in interest rates as compared with 2004, lessened to some extent by the competitive rate pricing structure maintained by the Corporation to attract new loans and further by the heightened competition for lending relationships that exists in the Corporation’s market. The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee increased the target Federal Funds Rate eight times during 2005 to 4.25 percent from 2.25 percent at December 31, 2004.
Average loan volume increased $89.3 million or 24.45 percent in 2005, while portfolio yield increased by 50 basis points as compared with the same period in 2004. The increased total average loan volume was due primarily to increased customer activity, new lending relationships and new markets. The volume related factors during the period, contributed increased revenue of $4.8 million, while the rate related changes contributed $2.0 million. Total average loan volume increased to $454.4 million with a net interest yield of 5.57 percent, as compared to $365.1 million with a yield of 5.07 percent for the year ended December 31, 2004.
For additional information regarding loans, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


27


[v036625ex13006.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision
The purpose of the allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) is to absorb the impact of losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through provisions charged against current operations and through recoveries made on loans previously charged-off. In 2005, the Corporation’s allowance was also increased by the amount of Red Oak Bank’s allowance at the time of the acquisition which amounted to $1.2 million. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount considered adequate by management to provide for potential credit losses based upon a periodic evaluation of the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. In establishing an appropriate allowance, an assessment of the individual borrowers, a determination of the value of the underlying collateral, a review of historical loss experience and an analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories, delinquencies and problem loans are considered. Such factors as the level and trend of interest rates and current economic conditions and peer group statistics are also reviewed. At year-end 2005, the level of the allowance was $4,937,000 as compared to a level of $3,781,000 at December 31, 2004. The Corporation did not make a provision to the allowance for loan losses in 2005. The Corporation made a provision to the allowance for loan losses of $752,000 in 2004 and $522,000 in 2003. The increase in the allowance for loan losses during 2005 consisted of $1,210,000 in existing loan loss reserves acquired as a result of the purchase of Red Oak Bank in May 2005. The level of the allowance during the respective annual periods of 2005 and 2004 reflects the credit quality within the loan portfolio, the loan volume recorded during the periods and the Corporation’s focus on the changing composition of the commercial and residential real estate loan portfolios.
At December 31, 2005, the allowance for loan losses amounted to 0.98 percent of total loans. In management’s view, the level of the allowance at December 31, 2005, is adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management’s judgment regarding the adequacy of the allowance constitutes a “Forward Looking Statement” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from management’s analysis, based principally upon the factors considered by management in establishing the allowance.
Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate, which is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to increase the allowance based on their analysis of information available to them at the time of their examination. Furthermore, the majority of the Corporation’s loans are secured by real estate in the State of New Jersey. Future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to economic factors impacting New Jersey real estate as well as operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond the Corporation’s control. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans amounted to 0.98 percent, 1.00 percent and 0.86 percent at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Net charge-offs were $54,000 in 2005 and $18,000 in 2003. Net recoveries were $27,000 in 2004. During 2005, the Corporation experienced an increase in the volume of charge-offs in the installment and commercial loan portfolios compared to 2004 and 2003 levels, attributable to the increase in interest rates and a higher level of personal bankruptcies.
The Corporation had non-accrual loans at December 31, 2005 of $387,000, no loans on non-accrual at December 31, 2004 and $26,000 at December 31, 2003. The Corporation continues to aggressively pursue collections of principal and interest on loans previously charged-off.
The value of impaired loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Impaired loans consist of non-accrual loans and loans internally classified as substandard or below, in each instance above an established dollar threshold of $200,000. All loans below the established dollar threshold are considered homogenous and are collectively evaluated for impairment. At December 31, 2005, total impaired loans amounted to $299,850 compared with $205,529 at December 31, 2004, and $358,000 at December 31, 2003. The reserves allocated to such loans in 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $44,000, $1,000,


28


and $6,000, respectively. Although classified as substandard, the impaired loans were current with respect to principal and interest payments.
Five-Year Statistical Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table reflects the relationship of loan volume, the provision and allowance for loan losses and net charge-offs (recoveries) for the past five years.
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
                                 
Average loans outstanding
 
$
454,372
    
$
365,104
    
$
276,457
    
$
222,819
    
$
205,991
 
Total loans at end of period
 
$
505,826
 
$
377,304
 
$
349,525
 
$
229,051
 
$
211,236
 
Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at the beginning of year
 
$
3,781
 
$
3,002
 
$
2,498
 
$
2,191
 
$
1,655
 
Charge-offs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
 
49
 
 
 
 
 
 
48
 
 
 
Installment loans
 
 
33
 
 
11
 
 
39
 
 
69
 
 
127
 
Total charge-offs
 
 
82
 
 
11
 
 
39
 
 
117
 
 
127
 
Recoveries:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
48
 
 
 
Installment loans
 
 
28
 
 
38
 
 
21
 
 
16
 
 
7
 
Total recoveries
 
 
28
 
 
38
 
 
21
 
 
64
 
 
7
 
Net charge-offs (recoveries)
 
 
54
 
 
(27
)
 
18
 
 
53
 
 
120
 
Addition of Red Oak Bank’s
allowance – May 20, 2005
 
 
1,210
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for loan losses
 
 
 
 
752
 
 
522
 
 
360
 
 
656
 
Balance at end of year
 
$
4,937
 
$
3,781
 
$
3,002
 
$
2,498
 
$
2,191
 
Ratio of net charge-offs during the year to average loans outstanding during the year
 
 
0.01
%
 
N/M
 
 
0.01
%
 
0.02
%
 
0.06
%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans at end of year
 
 
0.98
%
 
1.00
%
 
0.86
%
 
1.09
%
 
1.04
%
Asset Quality
The Corporation manages asset quality and credit risk by maintaining diversification in its loan portfolio and through review processes that include analysis of credit requests and ongoing examination of outstanding loans and delinquencies, with particular attention to portfolio dynamics and mix. The Corporation strives to identify loans experiencing difficulty early enough to correct the problems, to record charge-offs promptly based on realistic assessments of current collateral values, and to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses at all times. These practices have protected the Corporation during economic downturns and periods of uncertainty.
It is generally the Corporation’s policy to discontinue interest accruals once a loan is past due as to interest or principal payments for a period of ninety days. When a loan is placed on non-accrual, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income. Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied against principal. A loan may only be restored to an accruing basis when it again becomes well secured and in the process of collection or all past due amounts have been collected. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are generally well secured and in the process of collection.


29


[v036625ex13007.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
The following table sets forth, as of the dates indicated, the amount of the Corporation’s non-accrual loans, accruing loans past due 90 days or more and other real estate owned. The Corporation had no restructured loans on any of such dates.
 
 
At December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
                                 
Non-accrual loans
 
$
387
    
$
    
$
26
    
$
229
    
$
109
 
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
 
 
179
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
 
Other real estate owned
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total non-performing assets
 
$
566
 
$
 
$
26
 
$
229
 
$
117
 
Non-accrual loans at December 31, 2005 increased $387,000 from none reported at December 31, 2004, which were comprised of four commercial loans and two residential loans. The accruing loans past due 90 days or more at December 31, 2005 consisted of one commercial loan.
At December 31, 2005 other than the loans set forth above, the Corporation is not aware of any loans which present serious doubts as to the ability of its borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and which are expected to fall into one of the categories set forth in the table above. The Corporation did not have any other real estate owned (“OREO”) at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Non-Interest Income
The following table presents the principal categories of non-interest income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005.
 
 
 Years Ended December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
% change
 
2004
 
2003
 
% change
 
                                       
Service charges, commissions and fees
 
$
1,922
    
$
1,948
    
 
(1.33
)   
$
1,948
    
$
1,683
    
 
15.75
 
Other income
 
 
631
 
 
499
 
 
26.45
 
 
499
 
 
457
 
 
9.19
 
Annuity & insurance commissions
 
 
193
 
 
59
 
 
227.12
 
 
59
 
 
43
 
 
37.21
 
Bank Owned Life Insurance
 
 
740
 
 
734
 
 
.82
 
 
734
 
 
798
 
 
(8.02
)
Gain on securities sold
 
 
350
 
 
148
 
 
136.49
 
 
148
 
 
266
 
 
(44.36
)
Total other non-interest income
 
$
3,836
 
$
3,388
 
 
13.22
 
$
3,388
 
$
3,247
 
 
4.34
 
For the year ended December 31, 2005, total other non-interest income, exclusive of net gains on securities sold, reflects an increase of $246,000 or an increase of 7.59 percent compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. Fee income, comprised of service charges, commissions and fees, decreased by $26,000, attributable to decreased levels of core service charges, commissions, and fees. The increase in non-interest income was mainly due to the increase of $134,000 or 227.12% in annuity fees and insurance commissions. The increase in other income from the comparable period in 2004 was driven primarily by fees generated by lending activities, an increase of $132,000 or 26.45 percent. This amount includes loan servicing and mortgage banking fees and letter of credit fees.
During 2005, the Corporation recorded net gains of $350,000 on securities sold from the available-for-sale investment portfolio compared to gains of $148,000 and $266,000 recorded in 2004 and 2003. The sales were made in the normal course of business and proceeds were reinvested into the securities and loan portfolios.


30


Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense, including salary and employee benefits, net occupancy expense and premises and equipment expense, include the operating expenses of Red Oak Bank since its acquisition on May 20, 2005. These expenses include the cost related to one branch acquired which was also Red Oak Bank’s administration building. Other expenses for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2005 also include the core deposit intangible amortization of $75,000 resulting from the Red Oak Bank acquisition; other increased costs resulting from the acquisition include occupancy and bank premises expense, increased audit, marketing and advertising and computer related expenses related to the integration of Red Oak Bank into Union Center National Bank.
The following table presents the principal categories of non-interest expense for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005.
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
% Change
 
2004
 
2003
 
% Change
 
                                       
Salaries and employee benefits
 
$
12,108
    
$
10,140
    
 
19.41
    
$
10,140
    
$
10,425
    
 
(2.73
)
Occupancy, net
 
 
2,165
 
 
1,943
 
 
11.43
 
 
1,943
 
 
1,835
 
 
5.89
 
Premises and equipment
 
 
1,990
 
 
1,852
 
 
7.45
 
 
1,852
 
 
1,708
 
 
8.43
 
Stationery and printing
 
 
628
 
 
539
 
 
16.51
 
 
539
 
 
559
 
 
(3.58
)
Marketing and advertising
 
 
644
 
 
529
 
 
21.74
 
 
529
 
 
533
 
 
(0.75
)
Other
 
 
4,678
 
 
4,468
 
 
4.70
 
 
4,468
 
 
3,276
 
 
36.39
 
Total other non-interest expense
 
$
22,213
 
$
19,471
 
 
14.08
 
$
19,471
 
$
18,336
 
 
6.19
 
Total non-interest expense increased $2.7 million or 14.08 percent in 2005 from 2004 as compared with an increase of $1.1 million or 6.19 percent from 2003 to 2004. The level of operating expenses during 2005 increased in several expense categories. The year-to-year increase in operating expenses is primarily attributable to personnel-related expenses. Prudent management of operating expenses has and will continue to be a key objective of management in an effort to improve earnings performance. The Corporation’s ratio of other expenses to average assets declined to 2.02 percent in 2005 compared to 2.07 percent in 2004 and 2.10 percent in 2003.
Salaries and employee benefits increased $2.0 million or 19.41 percent in 2005 compared to 2004. Reflected in 2004’s expense was a credit of $478,000 to benefits expense representing a reduction in the Corporation’s obligation related to certain long-term benefit plans. Salaries and employee benefits accounted for 54.51 percent of total other non-interest expense in 2005, as compared to 52.08 percent and 56.86 percent for 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Staffing levels overall increased to 202 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2005 compared to 192 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2004 and 191 at December 31, 2003. The increase reflects staffing positions which were previously vacant and eight full-time equivalent employees retained in the acquisition of Red Oak Bank.
Occupancy and bank premises and equipment expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased $360,000 or 9.49 percent over 2004. The increase in occupancy and bank premises and equipment expense in 2005 is primarily attributable to higher operating costs (utilities, rent, general repair and maintenance) of the Corporation’s expanded facilities, coupled with higher equipment maintenance and repair and depreciation expenses. The increase in such expenses of $252,000 or 7.11 percent in 2004 over 2003 was also attributable to the increased costs of expanded bank facilities.
Stationery and printing expenses for the year increased $89,000 or 16.51 percent compared to 2004, in part related to the merger with Red Oak Bank. These costs decreased $20,000 or 3.58 percent in 2004 from 2003, reflecting the cost savings associated with continued vigilance in reduction of office expenses.
Marketing and advertising expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased $115,000 or 21.74 percent over the comparable twelve-month period in 2004, also reflecting the Red Oak Bank acquisition. These expenses decreased $4,000 or 0.75 percent in 2004 when compared with 2003 levels.
Other expenses increased by $210,000 or 4.70 percent compared to 2004. Increases in management fees, audit, amortization of core deposit intangible, legal, telephone and computer expenses were offset by reductions in professional fees associated with the expense of implementation of Section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley in 2004.


31


[v036625ex13008.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
Provision for Income Taxes
The Corporation’s provision for income taxes decreased from 2004 to 2005, primarily as a result of higher levels of non taxable interest income. The effective tax rates for the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were 13.41 percent, 17.56 percent and 15.34 percent, respectively. The effective tax rate continues to be less than the combined statutory Federal tax rate of 34 percent and the New Jersey State tax rate of 9 percent. The difference between the statutory and effective tax rates primarily reflects the tax-exempt status of interest income on obligations of states and political subdivisions, an increase in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance and disallowed expense items for tax purposes, such as travel and entertainment expense.
Tax-exempt interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis increased by $2.2 million or 36.75 percent from 2004 to 2005 and increased by $1.7 million or 39.90 percent from 2003 to 2004. The Corporation recorded income related to the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance as a component of other income in the amount of $740,000, $734,000 and $798,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting policies adopted by the Corporation during 2005 and the expected impact of accounting policies recently issued or proposed but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affects financial condition; results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable sections of the financial review and notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Share-Based Payments. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123 R”), which was to be effective for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005. On April 14, 2005, the effective date was amended. SFAS No. 123 R is now effective for interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123 R requires entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). The cost is recognized as an expense over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is usually the vesting period. As a result of SFAS No. 123 R, the Company will recognize the grant-date fair value of options as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period. This accounting treatment differs significantly from the previous accounting for fixed stock options under APB Opinion No. 25, which generally required expense recognition only when the exercise price of the option was less than the market price of the underlying stock on the grant date. As required by SFAS No. 123 R, the Corporation will estimate the fair value of stock options on each grant date, using an appropriate valuation model such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, will have a material impact on the financial statements of the Corporation for the full year 2006. Estimated future levels of compensation expense recognized related to stock based awards should be impacted by new awards, modifications to awards, or cancellation of awards after the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue. Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether impairment is other-than-temporary, and measurement of an impairment loss. An investment is considered impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost. Generally, an impairment is considered other-than-temporary unless: (i) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment; and (ii) evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. If impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss should be recognized equal to the difference between the investment’s cost and


32


its fair value. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in 2003 and the Company began presenting the new disclosure requirements in its Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. The recognition and measurement provisions were initially effective for other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, in September 2004, the effective date of these provisions was delayed until the finalization of a FASB Staff Position (FSP) to provide additional implementation guidance.
In June, the FASB decided not to provide additional guidance on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment, but directed its staff to issue proposed FSP EITF 03-1-a, “Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1,” as final. The final FSP will supersede EITF Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments,” and EITF Topic No. D-44, “Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment upon the Planned Sale of a Security Whose Cost Exceeds Fair Value.” The final FSP (retitled FSP FAS 115-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”) will replace the guidance set forth in paragraphs 10-18 of Issue 03-1 with references to existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance, such as FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59, “Accounting for Noncurrent Marketable Equity Securities”, and APB Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1. “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (the “FSP”), was issued on November 3, 2005 and addresses the determination of when an investment is considered impaired; whether the impairment is other than temporary; and how to measure an impairment loss. The FSP also addresses accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment on a debt security, and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The FSP replaces the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 03-1 with references to existing authoritative literature concerning other-than-temporary determinations (principally Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 59). Under the FSP, impairment losses must be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s cost and its fair value at the financial statement date, without considering partial recoveries subsequent to that date. The FSP also requires that an investor recognize an other-than-temporary impairment loss when a decision to sell a security has been made and the investor does not expect the fair value of the security to fully recover prior to the expected time of sale. The FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The Corporation does not expect that the application of the FSP will have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
SFAS No. 154. In May 2005 the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change in accounting principle, such as a change in nondiscretionary profit-sharing payments resulting from an accounting change, should be recognized in the period of the accounting change. SFAS 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 154, as applicable, beginning in fiscal 2006. The Company does not expect the impact of SFAS 154 will be material to its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Asset and Liability Management
Asset and Liability management encompasses an analysis of market risk, the control of interest rate risk (interest sensitivity management) and the ongoing maintenance and planning of liquidity and capital. The composition of the Corporation’s statement of condition is planned and monitored by the Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). In general, management’s objective is to optimize net interest income and minimize market risk and interest rate risk by monitoring these components of the statement of condition.


33


[v036625ex13009.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
Interest Sensitivity
Market Risk
“Market risk” represents the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The Corporation’s market rate risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its investing, lending and deposit taking activities. To that end, management actively monitors and manages its interest rate risk exposure.
The Corporation’s profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and substantial increase or decrease in interest rates may adversely affect the Corporation’s earnings to the extent that the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not similarly adjust. The Corporation’s primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to minimize the adverse impact of changes in interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income and capital, while structuring the Corporation’s asset-liability structure to obtain the maximum yield-cost spread on that structure. The Corporation relies primarily on its asset-liability structure to control interest rate risk. The Corporation continually evaluates interest rate risk management opportunities, including the use of derivative financial instruments. The management of the Corporation believes that hedging instruments currently available are not cost-effective, and, therefore, has focused its efforts on increasing the Corporation’s yield-cost spread through wholesale and retail growth opportunities.
The Corporation monitors the impact of changes in interest rates on its net interest income using several tools. One measure of the Corporation’s exposure to differential changes in interest rates between assets and liabilities is the Corporation’s analysis of its interest rate sensitivity. This test measures the impact on net interest income and on net portfolio value of an immediate change in interest rates in 100 basis point increments. Net portfolio value is defined as the net present value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.
The primary tool used by management to measure and manage interest rate exposure is a simulation model. Use of the model to perform simulations reflecting changes in interest rates over one and two-year time horizons has enabled management to develop and initiate strategies for managing exposure to interest rate risk. In its simulations, management estimates the impact on net interest income of various changes in interest rates. Projected net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates is modeled based on both an immediate rise and fall in interest rates (“rate shock”), as well as gradual changes in interest rates over a 12-month time period. The model is based on the actual maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The model incorporates assumptions regarding earning-asset and deposit growth, prepayments, interest rates and other factors.
Management believes that both individually and taken together, these assumptions are reasonable, but the complexity of the simulation modeling process results in a sophisticated estimate, not an absolutely precise calculation of exposure. For example, estimates of future cash flows must be made for instruments without contractual maturity or payment schedules.
The low level of interest rates had necessitated a modification of the Corporation’s standard rate scenario of a shock down 200 basis points over 12 months to down 100 basis points over a 12-month period. However given the recent rise in rates for the period ended December 31, 2005 the Corporation has returned to a -200 basis point shock down over a 12-month period. Based on the results of the interest simulation model as of December 31, 2005, and assuming that Management does not take action to alter the outcome, the Corporation would expect an increase of 5.09 percent in net interest income if interest rates decreased 200 basis points from the current rates in an immediate and parallel shock over a 12-month period. In a rising rate environment, based on the results of the model as of December 31, 2005, the Corporation would expect a decrease of 8.94 percent in net interest income if interest rates increased by 200 basis points from current rates in an immediate and parallel shock over a twelve month period.
Short-term interest rate exposure analysis is supplemented with an interest sensitivity gap model. The Corporation utilizes interest sensitivity analysis to measure the responsiveness of net interest income to changes in interest rate levels. Interest rate risk arises when an earning-asset matures or when its interest rate changes in a time period different from that of a supporting interest-bearing liability, or when an interest-bearing liability matures or when its interest rate changes in a time period different from that of an earning-asset that it supports. While the


34


Corporation matches only a small portion of specific assets and liabilities, total earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are grouped to determine the overall interest rate risk within a number of specific time frames. The difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities is referred to as the interest sensitivity gap. At any given point in time, the Corporation may be in an asset-sensitive position, whereby its interest-sensitive assets exceed its interest-sensitive liabilities, or in a liability-sensitive position, whereby its interest-sensitive liabilities exceed its interest-sensitive assets, depending on management’s judgment as to projected interest rate trends.
The Corporation’s rate sensitivity position in each time frame may be expressed as assets less liabilities, as liabilities less assets, or as the ratio between rate sensitive assets (“RSA”) and rate sensitive liabilities (“RSL”). For example, a short funded position (liabilities repricing before assets) would be expressed as a net negative position, when period gaps are computed by subtracting repricing liabilities from repricing assets. When using the ratio method, a RSA/RSL ratio of 1 indicates a balanced position, a ratio greater than 1 indicates an asset sensitive position and a ratio less than 1 indicates a liability sensitive position.
A negative gap and/or a rate sensitivity ratio less than 1, tends to expand net interest margins in a falling rate environment and to reduce net interest margins in a rising rate environment. Conversely, when a positive gap occurs, generally margins expand in a rising rate environment and contract in a falling rate environment. From time to time, the Corporation may elect to deliberately mismatch liabilities and assets in a strategic gap position.
At December 31, 2005, the Corporation reflects a negative interest sensitivity gap (or an interest sensitivity ratio of .68:1.00) at the cumulative one-year position. During all of 2005 and most of 2004, the Corporation had a negative interest sensitivity gap. The rising rates and a flattening of the yield curve during 2005 affected net interest margins. Based on management’s perception that interest rates will continue to be volatile, projected increased levels of prepayments on the earning-asset portfolio and current level of interest rates, emphasis has been, and is expected to continue to be, placed on interest-sensitivity matching with the objective of stabilizing the net interest spread during 2006. However, no assurance can be given that this objective will be met.
The following table depicts the Corporation’s interest rate sensitivity position at December 31, 2005:
   
Expected Maturity/Principal Repayment December 31,
         
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Average
Interest
Rate
 
Year
End
2006
 
Year
End
2007
 
Year
End
2008
 
Year
End
2009
 
Year
End
2010
 
2011 and
Thereafter
 
Total
Balance
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
   
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS:
 
Loans
 
 
6.04
%  
$
205,875
    
$
65,818
    
$
69,364
    
$
48,268
    
$
36,587
    
$
74,976
    
$
500,889
    
$
492,267
 
Investments
 
 
4.55
%
 
161,933
 
 
65,544
 
 
73,108
 
 
40,684
 
 
41,106
 
 
146,310
 
 
528,684
 
 
528,798
 
Total interest-earning assets
 
 
 
 
$
367,808
 
$
131,362
 
$
142,472
 
$
88,952
 
$
77,693
 
$
221,286
 
$
1,029,573
 
$
1,021,065
 
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES:
Time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or greater
 
 
3.83
%
$
143,806
 
$
8,345
 
$
533
 
$
1,524
 
$
201
 
$
 
$
154,409
 
$
154,070
 
Time certificates of deposit of less than $100,000
 
 
3.15
%
 
65,074
 
 
16,036
 
 
1,587
 
 
1,213
 
 
860
 
 
 
 
84,770
 
 
84,212
 
Other interest-bearing deposits
 
 
1.88
%
 
176,053
 
 
17,768
 
 
839
 
 
630
 
 
274
 
 
125,947
 
 
321,511
 
 
321,289
 
Subordinated Debentures
 
 
7.76
%
 
10,310
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,155
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15,465
 
 
15,465
 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Fed Funds Purchased
 
 
3.26
%
 
118,997
 
 
 
 
17,500
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
136,497
 
 
135,637
 
Term Borrowings
 
 
4.08
%
 
28,000
 
 
27,000
 
 
1,740
 
 
 
 
65,726
 
 
35,000
 
 
157,466
 
 
159,398
 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
 
 
 
$
542,240
 
$
69,149
 
$
22,199
 
$
8,522
 
$
67,061
 
$
160,947
 
$
870,118
 
$
870,071
 
Cumulative interest-earning assets
 
 
 
 
 
367,808
 
 
499,170
 
 
641,642
 
 
730,594
 
 
808,287
 
 
1,029,573
 
 
1,029,573
 
 
 
 
Cumulative interest-bearing liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
542,240
 
 
611,389
 
 
633,588
 
 
642,110
 
 
709,171
 
 
870,118
 
 
870,118
 
 
 
 
Rate sensitivity gap
 
 
 
 
 
(174,432
)
 
62,213
 
 
120,273
 
 
80,430
 
 
10,632
 
 
60,339
 
 
159,455
 
 
 
 
Cumulative rate sensitivity gap
 
 
 
 
$
(174,432
)
$
(112,219
)
$
8,054
 
$
88,484
 
$
99,116
 
$
159,455
 
$
159,455
 
 
 
 
Cumulative gap ratio
 
 
 
 
 
0.68
%
 
0.82
%
 
1.01
%
 
1.14
%
 
1.14
%
 
1.18
%
 
1.18
%
 
 
 



35





[v036625ex13010.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
The table above indicates the time period in which interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities will mature or may re-price in accordance with their contractual terms. However, this table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the Corporation’s net interest yield because the repricing of various categories of assets and liabilities is discretionary and is subject to competitive and other pressures. As a result, various assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within the same period may in fact re-price at different times and at different rate levels.
Expected maturities are contractual maturities adjusted for prepayments of principal based on current market indices. The Corporation uses certain assumptions to estimate fair values and expected maturities. For assets, expected maturities are based upon contractual maturity, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. For deposits, contractual maturities are assumed for certificates of deposit while other interest-bearing deposits were treated as if subject to immediate withdrawal.
Estimates of Fair Value
The estimation of fair value is significant to a number of the Corporation’s assets, including loans held for sale, available for sale investment securities, mortgage servicing rights (“MSR’s”). These are all recorded at either fair value or lower of cost or fair value. Fair values are volatile and may be influenced by a number of factors. Circumstances that could cause estimates of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities to change include a change in prepayment speeds, discount rates, or market interest rates. Fair values for most available for sale investment securities are based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic condition risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors.
These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and notes thereto, presented elsewhere herein, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the operations; unlike most industrial companies, nearly all of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities are monetary. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
Liquidity
The liquidity position of the Corporation is dependent on successful management of its assets and liabilities so as to meet the needs of both deposit and credit customers. Liquidity needs arise principally to accommodate possible deposit outflows and to meet customers’ requests for loans. Scheduled principal loan repayments, maturing investments, short-term liquid assets and deposit in-flows, can satisfy such needs. The objective of liquidity management is to enable the Corporation to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Management monitors current and projected cash flows, and adjusts positions as necessary to maintain adequate levels of liquidity. By using a variety of potential funding sources and staggering maturities, the risk of potential funding pressure is reduced. Management also maintains a detailed liquidity contingency plan designed to respond adequately to situations which could lead to liquidity concerns.


36


Management believes that the Corporation has the funding capacity to meet the liquidity needs arising from potential events. In addition to pledgeable securities, the Corporation also maintains borrowing capacity through the Federal Discount Window and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York secured with loans and marketable securities.
Liquidity is measured and monitored for the Corporation’s bank subsidiary, Union Center National Bank (the “Bank”). The Corporation reviews its net short-term mismatch. This measures the ability of the Corporation to meet obligations should access to Bank dividends be constrained. At December 31, 2005, the parent Corporation had $18.6 million in cash and short-term investments compared to $11.4 million at December 31, 2004. The change in cash at the parent Corporation level was due in part to the issuance of stock in June of 2005 offset by investing activity. Expenses at the parent Corporation are minimal and management believes that the parent Corporation has adequate liquidity to fund its obligations.
Certain provisions of long-term debt agreements prevent the Corporation from creating liens on, disposing of or issuing voting stock of subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2005 the Corporation was in compliance with all covenants and provisions of these agreements.
Management monitors current and projected cash flows, and adjusts positions as necessary to maintain adequate levels of liquidity. By using a variety of potential funding sources and staggering maturities, the risk of potential funding pressure is somewhat reduced. Management also maintains a detailed liquidity contingency plan designed to adequately respond to situations which could lead to liquidity concerns.
Anticipated cash-flows at December 31, 2005, projected to December 31, 2006, indicates that the Bank’s liquidity should remain strong, with an approximate projection of $213.8 million in anticipated cash flows over the next twelve months. This projection represents a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from this projection depending upon a number of factors, including the liquidity needs of the Bank’s customers, the availability of sources of liquidity and general economic conditions.
Deposits
Total deposits decreased from $702.3 million on December 31, 2004 to $700.6 million at December 31, 2005, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 0.24%. Total non-interest-bearing deposits increased from $127.2 million to $139.9 million, an increase of $12.7 million or 9.97%. This increase included $7.9 million from the acquisition of Red Oak Bank. Time, savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts decreased from $575.0 million on December 31, 2004 to $560.7 million at December 31, 2005, a decrease of $14.3 million or 2.50%. The Corporation acquired $62.7 million in interest-bearing transaction accounts from the Red Oak Bank acquisition. Time deposits $100,000 and over decreased $9.4 million to $154.4 million. The Red Oak Bank acquisition contributed $42.0 million in time deposits including $13.0 million in time deposits $100,000 and over.
The Corporation derives a significant proportion of its liquidity from its core deposit base. For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005, core deposits, comprised of total demand deposits, savings and money market accounts, increased by $28.9 million or 6.01% from December 31, 2004 to $451.7 million. At December 31, 2005, core deposits were 64.5% of total deposits compared to 65.6% at year-end 2004. Alternatively, the Corporation uses a more stringent calculation for the management of its liquidity positions internally which consists of total demand and savings accounts (excluding Super Max and money market accounts under $100,000) and excludes time deposits as part of core deposits as a percentage of total deposits. This number increased primarily from the addition of Red Oak Bank and represented 47.78 percent of total deposits as compared with 46.08 percent at December 31, 2004.
More volatile rate sensitive deposits, concentrated in certificates of deposit $100,000 and greater, decreased to 22.04 percent of total deposits from 23.33 percent at December 31, 2004. This change was due primarily to rate competition for certificates of deposit $100,000 and greater in 2005 compared to rates during 2004.


37


[v036625ex13011.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
The following table depicts the Corporation’s core deposit mix at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Core Deposit Mix
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
   
2005
 
2004
 
Net Change
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Percentage
 
Amount
 
Percentage
 
Volume 2005
vs. 2004
 
                                 
Demand Deposits
 
$
139,723
    
 
41.7
    
$
127,226
    
 
39.3
    
$
12,497
 
Interest-Bearing Demand
 
 
100,610
 
 
30.1
 
 
91,512
 
 
28.3
 
 
9,098
 
Regular Savings
 
 
72,624
 
 
21.7
 
 
75,689
 
 
23.4
 
 
(3,065
)
Money Market Deposits under $100
 
 
21,775
 
 
6.5
 
 
29,183
 
 
9.0
 
 
(7,408
)
Total core deposits
 
$
334,732
 
 
100.0
 
$
323,610
 
 
100.0
 
$
11,122
 
Total deposits
 
$
700,601
 
 
 
 
$
702,272
 
 
 
 
 
($1,671
)
Core deposits to total deposits
 
 
47.78
%
 
 
 
 
46.08
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings can be used to satisfy daily funding needs. Balances in those accounts fluctuate on a day-to-day basis. The Corporation’s principal short-term funding sources are Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase. Average short-term borrowings, including federal funds purchased, during 2005 amounted to approximately $119.1 million, an increase of $13.6 million or 12.9 percent from 2004.
The following table is a summary of securities sold under repurchase agreements for each of the last three years.
 
 
 December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
               
Securities sold under repurchase agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average interest rate:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At year end
 
 
2.44
%   
 
1.29
%   
 
0.88
%
For the year
 
 
0.82
%
 
0.80
%
 
0.96
%
Average amount outstanding during the year:
 
$
119,079
 
$
105,449
 
$
97,125
 
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end:
 
$
160,842
 
$
131,791
 
$
111,358
 
Amount outstanding at year end:
 
$
75,693
 
$
84,757
 
$
99,724
 
Cash Flows
The consolidated statements of cash flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents from operating, investing and financing activities. During 2005, cash and cash equivalents (which increased overall by $7.3 million) were provided on a net basis by operating and financing activities and used on a net basis in investing activities. Cash flows from operating activities, primarily net income, and financing activities, primarily a net increase in borrowings and proceeds from the issuance of Center Bancorp’s common stock, were used in investing activities, primarily the increased volume of loans and property and equipment. During 2004, cash and cash equivalents (which decreased overall by $4.5 million) were provided on a net basis by operating and financing activities, primarily net deposit inflows and proceeds from the issuance of Center Bancorp’s common stock, were used in investing activities, primarily the increased volume of investment securities, loans and property and equipment. During 2003, cash and cash equivalents (which decreased overall by $6.7 million) were provided on a net basis by operating and financing activities and used on a net basis in investing activities. Cash flows from operating activities, primarily net income, and financing activities, primarily increased Federal Home Loan advances and short-term borrowings, were used in investing activities, primarily the increase volume of investment securities, loans and property and equipment.


38


Contractual Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2005 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Total
 
Less Than
1 Year
 

1-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After 5 Years
 
                       
Contractual Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Lease Obligations
 
$
5,886
    
$
610
    
$
1,279
    
$
1,375
    
$
2,622
 
Total contracted cost obligations
 
$
5,886
 
$
610
 
$
1,279
 
$
1,375
 
$
2,622
 
Commitment to purchase branch site
 
$
1,400
 
$
1,400
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
Total commitment to purchase branch site
 
$
1,400
 
$
1,400
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
Commitments to purchase when-issued securities
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
Total commitments to purchase when-issued securities
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
Other Long-term Liabilities/Long-term Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time Deposits
 
 
239,179
 
 
208,880
 
 
29,238
 
 
1,061
 
 
 
Overnight Federal funds purchased
 
 
40,000
 
 
40,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and repurchase agreements
 
 
253,963
 
 
106,997
 
 
27,000
 
 
19,240
 
 
100,726
 
Subordinated debentures
 
 
15,465
 
 
10,310
 
 
 
 
5,155
 
 
00
 
Total Other Long-term Liabilities/Long-term Debt
 
$
548,607
 
$
366,187
 
$
56,238
 
$
25,456
 
$
100,726
 
Other Commercial Commitments – Off Balance sheet
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Letter of credit
 
 
17,802
 
 
17,652
 
 
150
 
 
 
 
 
Other commercial commitments – Off balance sheet
 
 
66,627
 
 
59,208
 
 
6,667
 
 
746
 
 
6
 
Total off balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations
 
$
84,429
 
$
76,860
 
$
6,817
 
$
746
 
$
6
 
For further information see Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity averaged $85.8 million during 2005, an increase of $27.9 million or 48.26 percent, as compared to 2004. At December 31, 2005, stockholders’ equity totaled $99.5 million, an increase of $30.8 million from December 31, 2004. The increase reflects the issuance of 1,904,761 shares of the holding company’s common stock to a limited number of accredited investors in a private placement of its securities on June 30, 2005. The shares were issued at a purchase price of $10.50 per share. Net proceeds to the holding company were approximately $18.9 million, after commissions and expenses. The Corporation’s dividend reinvestment and optional stock purchase plan coupled with option activity contributed $627,000 in new capital during 2005. Book value per share at year-end 2005 was $7.41 compared to $6.59 at year-end 2004. Tangible book value at year-end 2005 was $6.11 compared to $6.39 at year end 2004. The decline in 2005 as compared to 2004 reflects the increase in goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of Red Oak Bank.
As of December 31, 2005 the Corporation has purchased 57,330 common shares at an average cost per share of $9.38 under the stock buyback program announced on January 24, 2002 for the repurchase of up to 266,254 shares of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock adjusted for subsequent stock dividends and stock splits. The repurchased shares were recorded as Treasury Stock, which resulted in a decrease in stockholders’ equity.
Capital
The maintenance of a solid capital foundation continues to be a primary goal for the Corporation. Accordingly, capital plans and dividend policies are monitored on an ongoing basis. The most important objective of the capital planning process is to balance effectively the retention of capital to support future growth and the goal of providing stockholders with an attractive long-term return on their investment.


39


[v036625ex13012.jpg]
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
& RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued
Risk-Based Capital/Leverage
At December 31, 2005, the Corporation’s total Tier I capital (defined as tangible stockholders’ equity for common stock and Trust Preferred Capital Securities) amounted to $102.2 million or 9.16 percent of total assets. The Tier I leverage capital ratio at December 31, 2005 was 9.07 percent of total quarterly average assets. Tier I capital excludes the effect of SFAS No. 115, which amounted to $4.6 million of net unrealized losses, after tax, on securities available-for-sale (reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income which is included in stockholders’ equity), and goodwill and intangible assets of $17.4 million as of December 31, 2005. For information on goodwill and intangible assets, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
United States bank regulators have additionally issued guidelines establishing minimum capital standards related to the level of assets and off balance-sheet exposures adjusted for credit risk. Specifically, these guidelines categorize assets and off balance-sheet items into four risk-weightings and require banking institutions to maintain a minimum ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets. At December 31, 2005, the Corporation’s Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios were 15.51 percent and 16.26 percent, respectively. These ratios are well above the minimum guidelines of capital to risk-adjusted assets in effect as of December 31, 2005. For information on risk-based capital and regulatory guidelines for the Corporation’s bank subsidiary, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the bank regulators regarding capital components, risk weightings and other factors. As of December 31, 2005, management believes that each of the Bank and the Corporation meet all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
Subordinated Debentures
On December 19, 2003, Center Bancorp Statutory Trust II, a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of Center Bancorp, Inc., issued $5.0 million of, MMCapS capital securities to investors due on January 23, 2034. The capital securities presently qualify as Tier 1 capital. The trust loaned the proceeds of this offering to the Corporation and received in exchange $5.2 million of the Corporation’s subordinated debentures. The subordinate debentures are redeemable in whole or part, prior to maturity but after January 23, 2009. The floating interest rate on the subordinate debentures is three-month libor plus 2.85% and reprices quarterly. The rate at December 31, 2005 was 7.09%.
On December 18, 2001, Center Bancorp Statutory Trust I, a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of Center Bancorp, Inc., issued $10.0 million of floating rate capital trust pass through securities to investors due on December 18, 2031. The trust loaned the proceeds of this offering to the Corporation and received in exchange $10.3 million of the Corporation’s subordinated debentures. The subordinated debentures are redeemable in whole or part, prior to maturity but after December 18, 2006. The floating interest rate on the subordinated debentures is three-month libor plus 3.60% and reprices quarterly. The rate at December 31, 2005 was 8.10%.
The additional capital raised with respect to the issuance of the floating rate capital pass through securities was used to bolster the Corporation’s capital and for general corporate purposes, including capital contributions to Union Center National Bank. Additional information regarding the capital treatment of these securities is contained herein on page 72.
Security Market Information
The common stock of the Corporation is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Corporation’s symbol is CNBC. As of December 31, 2005, the Corporation had 767 common stockholders of record. This does not include


40


beneficial owners for whom CEDE & Company or others act as nominees. On December 31, 2005, the closing market bid and asked price was $10.92-$10.96, respectively.
The following table sets forth the high and low bid price, and the dividends declared, on a share of the Corporation’s common stock for the periods presented.

 
Common Stock Price
 
 
 
 
 
2005 
 
2004 
 
 Common Dividends Declared
 
 
 
High
Bid
 
Low
Bid
 
High
Bid
 
Low
Bid
 
2005
 
2004
 
                                       
Fourth Quarter
 
 
11.85
    
 
10.70
    
$
12.96
    
$
10.96
    
$
0.0900
    
$
0.0857
 
Third Quarter
 
 
11.83
 
 
10.84
 
$
12.83
 
$
10.81
 
$
0.0900
 
$
0.0857
 
Second Quarter
 
 
12.00
 
 
10.95
 
$
14.54
 
$
10.64
 
$
0.0900
 
$
0.0857
 
First Quarter
 
 
12.04
 
 
10.89
 
$
17.72
 
$
14.25
 
$
0.0857
 
$
0.0816
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.3557
 
$
0.3387
 
For information on dividend restrictions and capital requirements, which may limit the ability of the Corporation to pay dividends, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Dividends declared on common stock (on a per common share basis) and common stock prices have been restated to reflect the 5% common stock dividend declared April 19, 2005, distributed June 15, 2005 to common shareholders of record May 31, 2005.
Looking Forward
One of the Corporation’s primary objectives is to achieve balanced asset and revenue growth, and at the same time expand market presence and diversify its financial products. However, it is recognized that objectives, no matter how focused, are subject to factors beyond the control of the Corporation, which can impede its ability to achieve these goals. The following factors should be considered when evaluating the Corporation’s ability to achieve its objectives:
The financial market place is rapidly changing. Banks are no longer the only place to obtain loans, nor the only place to keep financial assets. The banking industry has lost market share to other financial service providers. The future is predicated on the Corporation’s ability to adapt its products, provide superior customer service and compete in an ever-changing marketplace.
Net interest income, the primary source of earnings, is impacted favorably or unfavorably by changes in interest rates. Although the impact of interest rate fluctuations is mitigated by ALCO strategies, significant changes in interest rates can have an adverse impact on profitability.
The ability of customers to repay their obligations is often impacted by changes in the regional and local economy. Although the Corporation sets aside loan loss provisions toward the allowance for loan losses, significant unfavorable changes in the economy could impact the assumptions used in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance.
Technological changes will have a material impact on how financial service companies compete for and deliver services. It is recognized that these changes will have a direct impact on how the marketplace is approached and ultimately on profitability. The Corporation has already taken steps to improve its traditional delivery channels. However, continued success will likely be measured by the ability to react to future technological changes.
This “Looking Forward” description constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the Corporation’s forward-looking statements due to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the factors referred to above and in other sections of this Annual Report.


41


[v036625ex13013.jpg]
AVERAGE STATEMENTS OF CONDITION WITH INTEREST AND
AVERAGE RATES
 
 
 Years Ended December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 2005
 
 2004
 
 2003
 
(Tax-Equivalent Basis)
 
Average
Balance
 
Income/
Expense
 
Yield/
Rate
 
Average
Balance
 
Income/
Expense
 
Yield/
Rate
 
Average
Balance
 
Income/
Expense
 
Yield/
Rate
 
                                       
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities:(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxable
 
$
422,507
    
$
19,596
    
 
4.64
%  
$
404,641
    
$
17,565
    
 
4.34
%  
$
461,012
    
$
17,993
    
 
3.90
%
Non-taxable
 
 
150,149
 
 
8,094
 
 
5.39
%
 
110,225
 
 
5,919
 
 
5.37
%
 
72,914
 
 
4,231
 
 
5.80
%
Loans, net of unearned income:(2)
 
 
454,372
 
 
25,329
 
 
5.57
%
 
365,104
 
 
18,529
 
 
5.07
%
 
276,457
 
 
15,131
 
 
5.47
%
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell
 
 
1,091
 
 
29
 
 
2.66
%
 
 
 
 
 
0.00
%
 
 
 
 
 
0.00
%
Total interest-earning assets
 
 
1,028,119
 
 
53,048
 
 
5.16
%
 
879,970
 
 
42,013
 
 
4.77
%
 
810,383
 
 
37,355
 
 
4.61
%
Non-interest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
 
 
19,418
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20,006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21,720
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank owned life insurance
 
 
18,200
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16,857
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14,390
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other assets
 
 
40,434
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28,220
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27,617
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses
 
 
(4,534
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,414
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,664
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total non-interest earning assets
 
 
73,518
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
61,669
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
61,063
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
1,101,637
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
941,639
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
871,446
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                     
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market deposits
 
$
92,875
 
 
1,963
 
 
2.11
%
$
95,071
 
 
978
 
 
1.03
%
$
94,579
 
 
1,024
 
 
1.08
%
Savings deposits
 
 
114,305
 
 
1,610
 
 
1.41
%
 
139,406
 
 
1,368
 
 
0.98
%
 
153,856
 
 
1,877
 
 
1.22
%
Time deposits
 
 
227,249
 
 
6,766
 
 
2.98
%
 
181,094
 
 
4,560
 
 
2.52
%
 
147,941
 
 
3,881
 
 
2.62
%
Other interest-bearing deposits
 
 
118,881
 
 
1,260
 
 
1.06
%
 
77,203
 
 
509
 
 
.66
%
 
70,522
 
 
391
 
 
.55
%
Short term borrowings
and FHLB advances
 
 
304,364
 
 
10,624
 
 
3.49
%
 
241,536
 
 
5,811
 
 
2.41
%
 
216,615
 
 
5,058
 
 
2.34
%
Subordinated debentures
 
 
15,465
 
 
1,073
 
 
6.94
%
 
15,465
 
 
742
 
 
4.80
%
 
10,466
 
 
495
 
 
4.73
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
 
873,139
 
 
23,296
 
 
2.67
%
 
749,775
 
 
13,968
 
 
1.86
%
 
693,979
 
 
12,726
 
 
1.83
%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits
 
 
134,837
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
127,617
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
120,607
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other non-interest-bearing deposits
 
 
2,813
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
763
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
422
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other liabilities
 
 
5,076
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,630
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,479
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities
 
 
142,726
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
134,010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
125,508
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stockholders’ equity
 
 
85,772
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
57,854
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
51,959
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 
$
1,101,637
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
941,639
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
871,446
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest income
(tax-equivalent basis)
 
 
 
 
$
29,752
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
28,045
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
24,629
 
 
 
 
Net interest spread
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.49
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.91
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.78
%
Net interest income as percent of earning assets (margin)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.89
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.19
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.04
%
Tax-equivalent adjustment(3)
 
 
 
 
 
(2,545
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,964
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,436
)
 
 
 
Net interest income
 
 
 
 
$
27,207
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
26,081
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
23,193
 
 
 
 
——————
(1)
Average balances for available-for-sale securities are based on amortized cost.
(2)
Average balances for loans include loans on non-accrual status.
(3)
The tax-equivalent adjustment was computed based on a statutory Federal income tax rate of 34 percent.


42


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
   
December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
           
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks (Note 4)
 
$
19,343
    
$
12,033
 
Investment securities held to maturity (approximate market value of $140,628
in 2005 and $127,898 in 2004)
 
 
140,514
 
 
124,162
 
Investment securities available-for-sale
 
 
388,170
 
 
453,524
 
Total investment securities (Note 5 and 8)
 
 
528,684
 
 
577,686
 
Loans, net of unearned income (Note 6)
 
 
505,826
 
 
377,304
 
Less – Allowance for loan losses (Note 6)
 
 
4,937
 
 
3,781
 
Net loans
 
 
500,889
 
 
373,523
 
Premises and equipment, net (Note 7)
 
 
18,343
 
 
17,622
 
Accrued interest receivable
 
 
5,875
 
 
4,533
 
Bank owned life insurance (Note 1)
 
 
18,588
 
 
17,848
 
Other assets (Note 10)
 
 
5,670
 
 
3,679
 
Goodwill and other intangible assets
 
 
17,437
 
 
2,091
 
Total assets
 
$
1,114,829
 
$
1,009,015
 
               
LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-interest-bearing
 
$
139,911
 
$
127,226
 
Interest-bearing:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over
 
 
154,409
 
 
163,810
 
Interest-bearing transaction, savings and time deposits $100,000 and less
 
 
406,281
 
 
411,236
 
Total deposits
 
 
700,601
 
 
702,272
 
Overnight Federal funds and securities sold under agreement to repurchase
(Note 8)
 
 
98,193
 
 
84,757
 
Short-term borrowings (Note 8)
 
 
23,900
 
 
16,600
 
Long-term borrowings (Note 8)
 
 
171,870
 
 
115,000
 
Subordinated debentures (Note 12)
 
 
15,465
 
 
15,465
 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Notes 9 and 10)
 
 
5,311
 
 
6,278
 
Total liabilities
 
 
1,015,340
 
 
940,372
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Notes 11 and 15)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred Stock, no par value:
Authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock, no par value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 14,467,962 and 11,475,446 shares in 2005 and 2004, respectively
 
 
65,592
 
 
30,441
 
Additional paid in capital
 
 
3,787
 
 
4,477
 
Retained earnings
 
 
38,453
 
 
36,973
 
Treasury stock at cost (1,036,334 and 1,056,972 shares in 2005 and 2004, respectively)
 
 
(3,701
)
 
(3,775
)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income
 
 
(4,642
)
 
527
 
Total stockholders’ equity
 
 
99,489
 
 
68,643
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 
$
1,114,829
 
$
1,009,015
 
All per common share amounts have been adjusted retroactively for common stock splits and common stock dividends during the periods presented.


See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
43


[v036625ex13014.jpg]
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
 
 Years Ended December 31,
 
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
               
Interest income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and fees on loans
 
$
25,329
    
$
18,529
    
$
15,131
 
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxable interest income
 
 
18,849
 
 
16,459
 
 
17,097
 
Non-taxable interest income
 
 
4,001
 
 
3,596
 
 
2,775
 
Dividends
 
 
2,295
 
 
1,465
 
 
916
 
Interest on Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell
 
 
29
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest income
 
 
50,503
 
 
40,049
 
 
35,919
 
Interest expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest on certificates of deposit $100,000 and over
 
 
3,828
 
 
1,278
 
 
461
 
Interest on other deposits
 
 
7,771
 
 
6,137
 
 
6,712
 
Interest on borrowings
 
 
11,697
 
 
6,553
 
 
5,553
 
Total interest expense
 
 
23,296
 
 
13,968
 
 
12,726
 
Net interest income
 
 
27,207
 
 
26,081
 
 
23,193
 
Provision for loan losses (Note 6)
 
 
0
 
 
752
 
 
522
 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
 
 
27,207
 
 
25,329
 
 
22,671
 
Other income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service charges, commissions and fees
 
 
1,922
 
 
1,948
 
 
1,683
 
Other Income
 
 
631
 
 
499
 
 
457
 
Annuity and Insurance
 
 
193
 
 
59
 
 
43
 
Bank Owned Life Insurance
 
 
740
 
 
734
 
 
798
 
Gain on securities sold (Note 5)
 
 
350
 
 
148
 
 
266
 
Total other income
 
 
3,836
 
 
3,388
 
 
3,247
 
Other expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries and employee benefits (Note 9)
 
 
12,108
 
 
10,140
 
 
10,425
 
Occupancy, net (Note 16)
 
 
2,165
 
 
1,943
 
 
1,835
 
Premises and equipment (Notes 7 and 16)
 
 
1,990
 
 
1,852
 
 
1,708
 
Stationery and printing
 
 
628
 
 
539
 
 
559
 
Marketing and advertising
 
 
644
 
 
529
 
 
533
 
Other
 
 
4,678
 
 
4,468
 
 
3,276
 
Total other expense
 
 
22,213
 
 
19,471
 
 
18,336
 
Income before income tax expense
 
 
8,830
 
 
9,246
 
 
7,582
 
Income tax expense (Note 10)
 
 
1,184
 
 
1,624
 
 
1,163
 
Net income
 
$
7,646
 
$
7,622
 
$
6,419
 
Earnings per share: (Note 1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
.63
 
$
.79
 
$
.69
 
Diluted
 
$
.63
 
$
.78
 
$
.68
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
 
12,074,870
 
 
9,679,880
 
 
9,344,122
 
Diluted
 
 
12,119,291
 
 
9,737,706
 
 
9,441,972
 
All per common share amounts have been adjusted retroactively for common stock splits and common stock dividends during the periods presented.


See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
44


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
 
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003
 
 
 
Common
Stock
Amount
 
Additional
Paid In
Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Restricted
Stock
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
Stock-Holders’
Equity
 
                                             
Balance December 31, 2002
 
$
18,984
    
$
4,562
    
$
29,863
    
$
(4,254
)   
$
(285
)   
$
2,184
    
$
51,054
 
YEAR 2003
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash dividend
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,014
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,014
)
Issuance of common stock
 
 
421
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
421
 
Exercise of stock options
 
 
 
 
 
115
 
 
 
 
 
276
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
391
 
Restricted stock award
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
271
 
 
 
 
 
271
 
Comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6,419
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6,419
 
Unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the period (net of tax benefit of $792)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,538
)
 
 
 
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of tax of $90)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
176
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized holding loss on securities arising during the period (net of tax benefit of $701)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,362
)
 
(1,362
)
Total comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,057
 
Balance December 31, 2003
 
$
19,405
 
$
4,677
 
$
33,268
 
$
(3,978
)
(14
)
$
822
 
$
54,180
 
YEAR 2004
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Dividend
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,238
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,238
)
Private Placement: Common Stock
 
 
10,631
 
 
(542
)
 
(679
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9,410
 
Issuance of common stock
 
 
405
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
405
 
Exercise of stock options
 
 
 
 
 
342
 
 
 
 
 
203
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
545
 
Restricted stock award
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14
 
 
 
 
 
14
 
Comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,622
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,622
 
Additional minimum pension liability
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(57
)
 
 
 
Unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the period (net of tax benefit of $173)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(336
)
 
 
 
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of tax of $50)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
98
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the period (net of tax of $123) and additional minimum pension liability
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(295
)
 
(295
)
Total comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,327
 
Balance December 31, 2004
 
$
30,441
 
$
4,477
 
$
36,973
 
$
(3,775
)
$
0
 
$
527
 
$
68,643
 
YEAR 2005
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash dividend
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,518
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,518
)
Private Placement: Common stock
 
 
21,619
 
 
(1,120
)
 
(1,621
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18,878
 
Issuance of common stock
 
 
255
 
 
 
 
 
(27
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
228
 
Exercise of stock option
 
 
 
 
 
355
 
 
 
 
 
44
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
399
 
Common stock issued Red Oak Bank Acquisition
 
 
13,277
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13,277
 
Restricted stock award
 
 
 
 
 
75
 
 
 
 
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
105
 
Comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,646
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,646
 
Additional minimum pension liability
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(171
)
 
 
 
Unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the period (net of tax of $2,752)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(5,229
)
 
 
 
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of tax of $119)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
231
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the period (net of tax of $2,633) and additional minimum pension liability
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(5,169
)
 
(5,169
)
Total comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,477
 
Balance December 31, 2005
 
$
65,592
 
$
3,787
 
$
38,453
 
$
(3,701
)
$
0
 
$
(4,642
)
$
99,489
 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
45


[v036625ex13015.jpg]
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
7,646
    
$
7,622
    
$
6,419
 
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
 
1,827
 
 
1,580
 
 
1,412
 
Provision for loan losses
 
 
0
 
 
752
 
 
522
 
Provision for deferred taxes
 
 
4,628
 
 
106
 
 
(411
)
Gains on sale of investment securities available-for-sale
 
 
(350
)
 
(148
)
 
(266
)
Increase in accrued interest receivable
 
 
(1,342
)
 
(48
)
 
(46
)
(Increase) decrease in other assets
 
 
(3,097
)
 
(890
)
 
375
 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
 
 
(1,758
)
 
1,279
 
 
(601
)
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
 
 
(740
)
 
(734
)
 
(798
)
Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on investment securities, net
 
 
452
 
 
656
 
 
6,054
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
 
7,266
 
 
10,175
 
 
12,660
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available-for-sale
 
 
300,541
 
 
149,951
 
 
210,565
 
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities held to maturity
 
 
32,315
 
 
37,902
 
 
137,337
 
Purchase of FHLB and FRB Stock, Net
 
 
(3,589
)
 
(200
)
 
(2,840
)
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale
 
 
59,427
 
 
52,524
 
 
131,722
 
Purchase of securities available-for-sale
 
 
(297,133
)
 
(292,397
)
 
(387,965
)
Purchase of securities held to maturity
 
 
(44,089
)
 
(7,445
)
 
(77,584
)
Net increase in loans
 
 
(37,741
)
 
(27,000
)
 
(120,492
)
Property and equipment expenditures, net
 
 
(1,997
)
 
(3,592
)
 
(4,046
)
Cash consideration paid to acquire Red Oak Bank
 
 
(13,279
)
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash equivalents acquired from Red Oak Bank
 
 
2,433
 
 
 
 
 
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
 
 
 
 
(2,500
)
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities
 
 
(3,112
)
 
(92,757
)
 
(113,303
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
 
 
(72,346
)
 
69,351
 
 
16,570
 
Net increase in short-term borrowings
 
 
26,735
 
 
1,633
 
 
24,293
 
Proceeds from FHLB advances
 
 
192,439
 
 
50,000
 
 
85,000
 
Payment on FHLB advances
 
 
(158,659
)
 
(50,000
)
 
(35,000
)
Dividends paid
 
 
(4,518
)
 
(3,238
)
 
(3,014
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
 
 
19,106
 
 
10,360
 
 
1,083
 
Exercise of Stock Options
   
399
   
   
 
Issuance of subordinate debentures
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,000
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
 
 
3,156
 
 
78,106
 
 
93,932
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
 
7,310
 
 
(4,476
)
 
(6,711
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
 
 
12,033
 
 
16,509
 
 
23,220
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
 
$
19,343
 
$
12,033
 
$
16,509
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest paid on deposits and short term borrowings
 
$
23,228
 
$
13,921
 
$
12,423
 
Income taxes
 
$
1,221
 
$
1,650
 
$
2,022
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION AT DATE OF ACQUISITION:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of assets acquired
 
$
115,307
 
$
 
$
 
Goodwill and Deposit intangible
 
$
15,416
 
$
 
$
 
Liabilities assumed
 
$
88,556
 
$
 
$
 
Common stock issued for the Red Oak Bank acquisition, net
 
$
13,277
 
$
 
$
 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
46


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) are prepared on the accrual basis and include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Union Center National Bank (the “Bank”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated from the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Business
The Corporation is a bank holding company whose principal activity is the ownership and management of Union Center National Bank as mentioned above. The Bank provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers through branch locations in Union and Morris counties, New Jersey. Additionally, the Bank originates residential mortgage loans and services such loans for others. The Bank is subject to competition from other financial institutions and the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statement of condition and revenues and expenses for the reported period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and cash and due from banks, which are generally available within one day.
Investment Securities
The Corporation accounts for its investment securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities.” Investments are classified into the following categories: (1) held to maturity securities, for which the Corporation has both the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity, which are reported at amortized cost; (2) trading securities, which are purchased and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term and, are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings; and (3) available-for-sale securities, which do not meet the criteria of the other two categories and which management believes may be sold prior to maturity due to changes in interest rates, prepayment, risk, liquidity or other factors, and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable income taxes, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, which is included in stockholders’ equity and excluded from earnings.
Investment securities are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, which are recognized on a level yield method, as adjustments to interest income. Investment securities gains or losses are determined using the specific identification method.
The Bank adopted the disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 “The meaning of other than Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments” as of December 31, 2003. EITF 03-1 includes certain disclosures regarding quantitative and qualitative disclosures for investment securities accounted for under FASB 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” that are impaired at the balance sheet date, but an other-than temporary impairment has not been recognized.
Income Taxes
The Corporation recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be settled.


47


[v036625ex13016.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Continued
Loans
Loans are stated at their principal amounts less net deferred loan origination fees. Interest income is credited as earned except when a loan becomes past due 90 days or more and doubt exists as to the ultimate collection of interest or principal; in those cases the recognition of income is discontinued. When a loan is placed on non-accrual, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income.
Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied against principal. A loan may only be restored to an accruing basis when it again becomes well secured and in the process of collection or all past due amounts have been collected. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment to the loan’s yield using the level yield method.
The Corporation accounts for impaired loans in accordance with SFAS No. 114 “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”, as amended by SFAS No. 118 “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan- Income Recognition and Disclosures.” The value of impaired loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The Corporation has defined its population of impaired loans to include, at a minimum, non-accrual loans and loans internally classified as substandard or below, in each instance above an established dollar threshold of $200,000. All loans below the established dollar threshold are considered homogenous and are collectively evaluated for impairment.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses (“Allowance”) is maintained at a level determined adequate to provide for potential loan losses. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operations and reduced by loan charge-offs, net of recoveries. The allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio considering economic conditions, the volume and nature of the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience and individual credit situations.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.
The ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in the real estate market and economic conditions in the State of New Jersey and the impact of such conditions on the creditworthiness of the borrowers.
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While management uses available information to recognize loan losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations.
Bank Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost and bank premises and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation based on estimated useful lives of assets, computed principally on a straight-line basis. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Gains and losses on sales or other dispositions are recorded as a component of other income or other expenses.


48


Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned (“OREO”), representing property acquired through foreclosure, is carried at the lower of the principal balance of the secured loan or fair value less estimated disposal costs of the acquired property. Costs relating to holding the assets are charged to expenses.
Mortgage Servicing
The Company performs various servicing functions on loans owned by others. A fee, usually based on a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the loan, is received for those services. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Corporation was servicing approximately $15.0 million and $16.1 million, respectively, of loans for others.
The Corporation accounts for its transfers and servicing of financial assets in accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” The Corporation originates mortgages under plans to sell those loans and service the loans owned by the investor. The Corporation records mortgage servicing rights and the loans based on relative fair values at the date of sale. The balance of mortgage servicing rights at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.
Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower aggregated costs or estimated fair value. Gains and losses on sales of loans are also accounted for in accordance with SFAS No.134 “Accounting for Mortgage Securities retained after Securitizations or Mortgage Loans Held for Sale by a Mortgage Banking Enterprise.” At December 31, 2005 and 2004 there were no loans held for sale.
Employee Benefit Plans
The Corporation has certain employee benefit plans covering substantially all employees. The Corporation accrues such costs as incurred.
The Corporation follows the disclosure provisions of SFAS No.132 “Employers” Disclosures about Pensions and Other Post Retirement Benefits which was revised in December 2003. SFAS No.132 as revised, required additional employers’ disclosures about pension and other post retirement benefit plans after December 31, 2003. Certain disclosures related to estimated future benefit payments are effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. Net pension expense consists of service costs, interest cost, return on pension assets and amortization of unrecognized initial net assets.
Pension Plan
The Corporation has a non-contributory pension plan covering all eligible employees. The Corporation’s policy is to fund at least the minimum contribution required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The costs associated with the plan are accrued based on actuarial assumptions and included in non-interest expense.
Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123 R”), which was to be effective for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005. On April 14, 2005, the effective date was amended. SFAS No. 123 R is now effective for interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123 R requires entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). The cost is recognized as an expense over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is usually the vesting period. As a result of SFAS No. 123 R, the Company will recognize the grant-date fair value of options as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period. This accounting treatment differs significantly from the previous accounting for fixed stock options under APB Opinion No. 25, which generally required expense recognition only when the exercise price of the option was less than the market price of the underlying stock on the grant date. As required by SFAS No. 123 R, the Corporation will estimate the fair value of stock options on each grant date, using an appropriate valuation model such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model.


49


[v036625ex13017.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Continued
At December 31, 2005 the Corporation has four stock-based compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 9. The Corporation has accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations.”  No stock-based employee compensation cost related to stock options is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Corporation had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123R, accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to the Corporation’s stock option plans.
 
 
 Years Ended December 31,
 
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
Net Income, as reported
 
$
7,646
    
$
7,622
    
$
6,419
 
Add: compensation expense recognized for restricted stock award, net of related tax effect
 
$
69
 
$
9
 
$
9
 
Deduct: Total Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects
 
 
462
 
 
101
 
 
64
 
Pro forma net income
 
$
7,253
 
$
7,530
 
$
6,364
 
Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic – as reported
 
$
.63
 
$
.79
 
$
.69
 
Basic – pro forma
 
$
.60
 
$
.78
 
$
.68
 
Diluted – as reported
 
$
.63
 
$
.78
 
$
.68
 
Diluted – pro forma
 
$
.60
 
$
.77
 
$
.67
 
Earnings Per Share
All common share and per common share amounts have been adjusted retroactively for the effect of stock splits and stock dividends.
Basic Earnings per Share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes any additional common shares as if all potentially dilutive common shares were issued (e.g. stock options). The Corporation’s weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted EPS include the effect of stock options outstanding using the Treasury Stock Method, which are not included in the calculation of basic EPS.
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:
 
 
 Years Ended December 31,
 
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
Net income
 
$
7,646
    
$
7,622
    
$
6,419
 
Average number of common shares outstanding
 
 
12,075
 
 
9,680
 
 
9,344
 
Effect of dilutive options
 
 
44
 
 
57
 
 
95
 
Effect of restricted stock awards
 
 
0
 
 
1
 
 
3
 
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share
 
 
12,119
 
 
9,738
 
 
9,442
 
Net income per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
.63
 
$
.79
 
$
.69
 
Diluted
 
$
.63
 
$
.78
 
$
.68
 


50





Treasury Stock
As of December 31, 2005 the Corporation has purchased 57,330 common shares at an average cost per share of $9.38 under the stock buyback program announced on January 24, 2002 for the repurchase of up to 266,254 shares of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock.
Treasury stock is recorded using the cost method and accordingly is presented as a reduction of stockholders’ equity.
Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
The Corporation adopted SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets,” on January 1, 2002. This statement modifies the accounting for all purchases goodwill and intangible assets for impairment rather than amortize them. The Corporation has tested the goodwill and has determined that it is not impaired.
Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Corporation’s other comprehensive income is comprised of unrealized holding gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and an additional minimum pension liability.
Disclosure of comprehensive income for the years ended 2005, 2004, and 2003 is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity.
Bank Owned Life Insurance
During 2001, the Corporation invested $13.0 million in Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) to help offset the rising cost of employee benefits, and made a subsequent investment in 2004 of $2.5 million. The change in the cash surrender value of the BOLI was recorded as a component of other income and amounted to $740,000 in 2005, $734,000 in 2004 and $798,000 in 2003.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in the consolidated financial statements for 2004 and 2003 to conform to the classifications presented in 2005.
NOTE 2 — ACQUISITIONS
The Corporation completed the acquisition of Red Oak Bank as of the close of business on May 20, 2005. Red Oak Bank was a State chartered commercial bank and operated one full service branch location in Hanover Township, Morris County, New Jersey. The acquisition presented the Corporation with the strategic opportunity to enhance shareholder value, market share and earnings growth. The opportunities include increasing the Corporation’s loan portfolio, strengthening and expanding the Corporation’s presence in the affluent and desirable business areas of the Morris County marketplace which compliments the Corporation’s existing footprint in that market through additional retail and commercial banking product offerings, increasing deposit share and further building the Corporation’s core deposit funding base, as well as enhancing the Corporation’s opportunities for earning asset generation.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, 50% of Red Oak Bank’s common stock was converted into Center Bancorp, Inc. common stock at an exchange rate of .9227 Center Bancorp, Inc. shares per each Red Oak Bank share and 50% was converted into $12.06 in cash for each Red Oak Bank share. The aggregate consideration paid in the merger consisted of $13.3 million in cash and 1,015,816 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The cash portion of the merger consideration was funded through the sale of securities available for sale and cash from continuing operations. The Corporation additionally converted remaining stock options covering 56,266 shares of Red Oak Bank common stock outstanding at the time of the merger and were exchanged for options covering 54,514 shares of Center Bancorp, Inc. common stock.


51


[v036625ex13018.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 2 — ACQUISITIONS Continued
As a result of the Red Oak Bank acquisition, the Corporation acquired assets having a fair value of $115.3 million, including $89.6 million of net loans, $5.4 million of investment securities and $2.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, and assumed $70.7 million of deposits, $17.1 million of borrowings, and $792,000 of other liabilities.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and the excess cost over the fair value of net assets acquired (“goodwill”) in the transaction was $14.7 million. Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, goodwill is not being amortized in connection with this transaction and the goodwill will not be deductible for income tax purposes. The Corporation also recorded a core deposit intangible of $702,617 in connection with the acquisition, which is being amortized on a 10-year sum of the digits method. The amortization of premiums and discounts resulting from the fair value adjustments of assets and liabilities amounted to approximately $323,342 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The results of operations for 2005 include Red Oak Bank’s results of operations from May 20, 2005 forward.
The following table presents data with respect to the net fair values of assets and liabilities acquired in the Red Oak Bank acquisition (in thousands):
 
 
At May 20, 2005
 
         
ASSETS
       
Cash and due from banks
                                           
$
2,433
 
Securities
   
5,404
 
Loans, net
 
 
89,626
 
Fixed assets
 
 
476
 
Other assets
 
 
1,952
 
Core deposit intangible
   
703
 
Goodwill
   
14,713
 
Total assets
   
115,307
 
         
LIABILITIES
       
Deposits
   
70,674
 
Borrowings
   
17,090
 
Other liabilities
   
792
 
Total liabilities
   
88,556
 
Net assets acquired
 
$
26,751
 
The net deferred tax liability resulting from adjustments of net assets acquired, including the creation of the core deposit intangible amounted to $524,740. Transaction and acquisition costs have been determined in accordance with purchase accounting. Estimated costs in connection with the acquisition and included as a component of goodwill amounted to $634,764, all of which were paid as of December 31, 2005.
NOTE 3 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
SFAS 123R
In December 2004, the FASB issued a revision to SFAS No. 123R, Share-based Payments (“FASB 123R”). This statement established standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services. This statement requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. In addition, this statement established fair value measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all entities to apply a fair-value based measurement method in accounting for share-based payment transactions. This statement replaces SFAS No. 123,


52


Accounting for stock based compensation and supercedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. In addition this statement amends SFAS No. 95, statement of Cash Flows, to require that excess tax benefits be reported as a financing cash inflows rather than as a reduction of taxes paid.
The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, will have a material impact on the financial statements of the Corporation for the full year 2006. Estimated future levels of compensation expense recognized related to stock based awards will be impacted by new awards, modifications to awards, or cancellation of awards after the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment:
At its November 12-13, 2003 meeting, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on the issue 003-01, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments,” that certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures should be required for debt and marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity under SFAS No.115 and SFAS No.124 that are impaired at the balance sheet date but for which an other than temporary impairment has not been recognized. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in 2003 and the Company began presenting the new disclosure requirements in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. The recognition and measurement provisions were initially effective for other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, in September 2004, the effective date of these provisions was delayed until the finalization of a FASB Staff Position (FSP) to provide additional implementation guidance.
On November 3, 2005, FSP FAS Nos. 115-1 and FAS 124-1 “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments,” was issued. The FSP also addresses accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment on a debt security, and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The FSP replaces the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 03-1 with references to existing authoritative literature concerning other-than-temporary determinations (principally Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 59). Under the FSP, impairment losses must be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s cost and its fair value at the financial statement date, without considering partial recoveries subsequent to that date. The FSP also requires that an investor recognize other-than-temporary impairment losses when a decision to sell a security has been made and the investor does not expect the fair value of the security to fully recover prior to the expected time of sale. The FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The Corporation does not expect that the adoption of the FSP in 2006 will have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
SFAS No. 154
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change in accounting principle, such as a change in nondiscretionary profit-sharing payments resulting from an accounting change, should be recognized in the period of the accounting change. SFAS 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate affected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption is permitted for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after the date this Statement is issued. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 154, as applicable, beginning in fiscal 2006. The Company does not expect the impact of SFAS 154 will be material to its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


53


 [v036625ex13019.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 4 — CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The subsidiary bank, Union Center National Bank, maintained cash balances reserved to meet regulatory requirements of the Federal Reserve Board of approximately $253,000 and $234,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
NOTE 5 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The following tables present information related to the Corporation’s portfolio of securities held to maturity and available-for-sale at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
   
December 31, 2005
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
                   
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities
 
$
1,122
    
$
56
    
$
    
$
1,178
 
Federal Agency Obligations
 
 
33,577
 
 
91
 
 
443
 
 
33,225
 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions
 
 
60,004
 
 
542
 
 
747
 
 
59,799
 
Other securities
 
 
45,811
 
 
1,219
 
 
604
 
 
46,426
 
 
 
$
140,514
 
$
1,908
 
$
1,794
 
$
140,628
 
   
December 31, 2005
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
 Estimated
Fair
Value
 
                   
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities
 
$
588
    
$
    
$
6
    
$
582
 
Federal Agency Obligations
 
 
215,257
 
 
 
 
5,878
 
 
209,379
 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions
 
 
45,574
 
 
140
 
 
909
 
 
44,805
 
Other securities
 
 
107,786
 
 
778
 
 
1,012
 
 
107,552
 
FHLB stock and other equity securities
 
 
25,706
 
 
238
 
 
92
 
 
25,852
 
 
 
$
394,911
 
$
1,156
 
$
7,897
 
$
388,170
 
 
 
December 31, 2004
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
                   
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities
 
$
2,375
    
$
86
    
$
    
$
2,461
 
Federal Agency Obligations
 
 
33,482
 
 
458
 
 
190
 
 
33,750
 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions
 
 
48,813
 
 
1,152
 
 
261
 
 
49,704
 
Other securities
 
 
2,958
 
 
4
 
 
7
 
 
2,955
 
FHLB stock and other equity securities
 
 
36,534
 
 
2,496
 
 
2
 
 
39,028
 
 
 
$
124,162
 
$
4,196
 
$
460
 
$
127,898
 


54


 
   
December 31, 2004
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
                   
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities
 
$
3,397
    
$
    
$
    
$
3,397
 
Federal Agency Obligations
 
 
247,439
 
 
505
 
 
1,703
 
 
24,624
 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions
 
 
53,403
 
 
755
 
 
366
 
 
53,792
 
Other securities
 
 
28,556
 
 
79
 
 
232
 
 
28,403
 
FHLB stock and other equity securities
 
 
120,187
 
 
1,776
 
 
272
 
 
121,691
 
 
 
$
452,982
 
$
3,115
 
$
2,573
 
$
453,524
 
A portion of the Corporation’s investment securities are classified as available-for-sale, approximately 73.42% at December 31, 2005. The available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses included in equity, net of taxes. Accordingly, the carrying value of such securities reflects their fair value at the balance sheet date. Fair value is based on quoted market price. The remainder of the portfolio is classified as held to maturity and reported at amortized cost.
The following table presents information for investments in securities held to maturity and securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2005, based on scheduled maturities. Actual maturities can be expected to differ from scheduled maturities due to prepayment or early call options of the issuer. Equity securities held in the available for sale portfolio are included in the due in one year or less category in the table below.
 
 
Held to Maturity 
 
 Available-for-Sale
 
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
                           
Due in one year or less
 
$
502
    
$
502
    
$
38,548
    
$
38,679
 
Due after one year through five years
 
 
9,785
 
 
9,872
 
 
44,921
 
 
44,349
 
Due after five years through ten years
 
 
28,535
 
 
28,495
 
 
76,151
 
 
74,062
 
Due after ten years
 
 
101,692
 
 
101,759
 
 
235,291
 
 
231,080
 
Total
 
$
140,514
 
$
140,628
 
$
394,911
 
$
388,170
 
During 2005, securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio amounted to approximately $59.4 million. The gross realized losses on securities sold amounted to $322,508, while the gross realized gains amounted to $672,702 in 2005. Securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio during 2004 amounted to $52.5 million with gross realized gains of $428,472 and gross realized losses of $280,260. Securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sales portfolio during 2003 amounted to $131.7 million with a gross realized gain of $1.2 million and gross realized losses of $917,170. These securities were sold in the ordinary course of business.
Temporarily Impaired Investments
Investments whose value is considered to be other than temporarily impaired are written down to fair value as a charge to realized losses. The cost basis of these written down investments is adjusted to fair value at the date the determination of impairment is made. The new cost basis is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in value. At December 31, 2005 there were no securities that reflected other than temporary impairment and no such write-downs occurred during 2005. At December 31, 2005, the unrealized losses associated with U.S. Treasury and Agency securities and Federal agency obligations, mortgage-backed securities, other taxable securities and tax-exempt securities are not considered to be other-than-temporary because their unrealized losses are related to changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or issuer. The Corporation has the intent and ability to hold them until the value recovers.


55


[v036625ex13020.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 5 — INVESTMENT SECURITIESContinued
The Corporation reviews all securities for potential recognition of other than temporary impairment. The Corporation maintains a watch list for the identification and monitoring of securities experiencing problems that required a heightened level of review. This could include credit rating downgrades.
The Corporation’s assessment of whether an investment in the portfolio of assets is other than temporary includes factors such as whether the issuer has defaulted on scheduled payments, announced restructuring  and/or filed for bankruptcy, has disclosed severe liquidity problems that cannot be resolved, disclosed deteriorating financial condition or sustained significant losses.
Factors affecting the market price include credit risk, market risk, interest rates, economic cycles, and liquidity risk. The magnitude of any unrealized loss may be affected by the relative concentration of the Corporation’s investments in any one issuer or industry. The Corporation has established policies to reduce exposure through diversification of concentration of the investment portfolio including limits on concentrations to any one issuer. The Corporation believes the investment portfolio is prudently diversified.
The decline in value is related to a change in interest rates and subsequent change in credit spreads required for these issues affecting market price. All issues are performing and are expected to continue to perform in accordance with their respective contractual terms and conditions. Short to intermediate average durations and in certain cases monthly principal payments should reduce further market value exposure to increases in rates.
In determining that the securities giving rise to the previously mentioned unrealized losses were not other than temporary, the Corporation evaluated the factors cited above, which the Corporation considers when assessing whether a security is other than temporarily impaired. In making these evaluations the Corporation must exercise considerable judgment. Accordingly there can be no assurance that the actual results will not differ from the Corporation’s judgments and that such differences may not require the future recognition of other-than-temporary impairment charges that could have a material affect on our financial position and results of operations. In addition, the value of, and the realization of any loss on, an investment security is subject to numerous risks as cited above.
The following table indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrelated loss position at December 31, 2005 and 2004:
Temporarily Impaired Investment Summary
December 31, 2005
   
Total
 
Less Than 12 Months
 
12 Months or Longer
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized Losses
 
                                       
U.S. Treasury obligations and direct
obligations of US government
 
$
31,150
    
$
(865
)   
$
15,235
    
$
(154
)  
$
17,915
    
$
(711
)
Federal agency CMO’s
 
 
199,588
 
 
(5,357
)
 
84,368
 
 
(1,728
)
 
115,220
 
 
(3,629
)
Federal agency mortgage backed securities
 
 
49,261
 
 
(1,474
)
 
26,909
 
 
(580
)
 
22,352
 
 
(894
)
Asset backed securities
 
 
24,030
 
 
(38
)
 
24,030
 
 
(38
)
 
 
 
 
Corporate bonds
 
 
12,451
 
 
(209
)
 
8,080
 
 
(84
)
 
4,371
 
 
(125
)
Municipal tax exempt obligations
 
 
61,368
 
 
(1,656
)
 
31,394
 
 
(478
)
 
29,974
 
 
(1,178
)
FHLB Stock and other equity securities
 
 
1,716
 
 
(92
)
 
1,716
 
 
(92
)
 
 
 
 
Total temporarily impaired securities
 
$
381,564
 
$
(9,691
)
$
191,732
 
$
(3,154
)
$
189,832
 
$
(6,537
)



56


 
Temporarily Impaired Investment Summary
December 31, 2004
     
Total
 
Less Than 12 Months
 
12 Months or Longer
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized Losses
 
                                       
U.S. Treasury obligations and direct obligations of US government
 
$
23,846
    
$
(467
)   
$
10,319
    
$
(24
)   
$
13,527
    
$
(443
)
Federal agency CMO’s
 
 
126,249
 
 
(1,290
)
 
106,769
 
 
(803
)
 
19,480
 
 
(487
)
Federal agency mortgage backed securities
 
 
28,429
 
 
(375
)
 
28,429
 
 
(375
)
 
 
 
 
Corporate bonds
 
 
1,993
 
 
(2
)
 
1,993
 
 
(2
)
 
 
 
 
Municipal tax exempt obligations
 
 
35,896
 
 
(627
)
 
26,411
 
 
(296
)
 
9,485
 
 
(331
)
FHLB Stock and other equity securities
 
 
34,761
 
 
(272
)
 
14,190
 
 
 
 
20,571
 
 
(272
)
Total temporarily impaired securities
 
$
251,174
 
$
(3,033
)
$
188,111
 
$
(1,500
)
$
63,063
 
$
(1,533
)
Investment securities having a carrying value of approximately $190.9 million and $184.5 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, short-term borrowings, and FHLB advances and for other purposes required or permitted by law.
NOTE 6 — LOANS AND THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The following table sets forth the composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio net of deferred fees at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 2005
 
 2004
 
               
Real estate – residential mortgage
 
$
261,028
     
$
221,893
 
Real estate – commercial
 
 
164,841
 
 
119,352
 
Commercial and industrial
 
 
79,006
 
 
30,929
 
Installment
 
 
951
 
 
5,130
 
Total
 
$
505,826
 
$
377,304
 
At December 31, 2005 and 2004 loans to officers and directors aggregated approximately $4,077,255 and $4,309,302, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Corporation made new loans to officers and directors in the amount of $1,687,969; payments by such persons during 2005 aggregated $1,920,016. Management is of the opinion that the above loans were made on the same terms and conditions as those prevailing for comparable transactions with non-related borrowers.
A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
Balance at the beginning of year
 
$
3,781
    
$
3,002
    
$
2,498
 
Provision for loan losses
 
 
0
 
 
752
 
 
522
 
Addition of Red Oak Bank’s Allowance-May 20, 2005
 
 
1,210
 
 
 
 
 
Loans charged-off
 
 
(82
)
 
(11
)
 
(39
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off
 
 
28
 
 
38
 
 
21
 
Balance at the end of year
 
$
4,937
 
$
3,781
 
$
3,002
 



57


[v036625ex13021.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 6 — LOANS AND THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSESContinued
Total non-performing assets are comprised of the outstanding balances of accruing loans, which are 90 days, or more past due as to principal or interest payments, non-accrual loans and other real estate owned. Total non-performing assets at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
Loans past due in excess of 90 days and still accruing
 
$
179
 
$
 
$
 
Non-accrual loans
 
 
387
 
 
 
 
26
 
Other real estate owned
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total non-performing assets
 
$
566
 
$
 
$
26
 
The amount of interest income that would have been recorded on non-accrual loans in 2005, 2004 and 2003 had payments remained in accordance with the original contractual terms approximated $28,905, $0 and $1,700 respectively, no interest income was received on these types of assets in 2005, 2004 and 2003.
At December 31, 2005, total impaired loans were approximately $299,850 as compared to $205,529 at December 31, 2004 and $358,000 at December 31, 2003. The reserves allocated to such loans in 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $44,000, $1,000, $6,000. Although classified as substandard at December 31, 2005, the impaired loans were current with respect to principal and interest payments. The Corporation’s total average impaired loans were $196,775 during 2005, $230,043 during 2004, and $377,000 during 2003. Interest income on impaired loans totaled $29,469 in 2005, $11,905 in 2004 and $22,000 in 2003.
At December 31, 2005, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were non-accrual or contractually past due in excess of 90 days and still accruing interest.
The policy of the Corporation is to generally grant commercial, mortgage and installment loans to New Jersey residents and businesses within its trading area. The borrowers’ abilities to repay their obligations are dependent upon various factors including the borrowers’ income and net worth, cash flows generated by the borrowers’ underlying collateral, value of the underlying collateral, and priority of the Bank’s lien on the property. Such factors are dependent upon various economic conditions and individual circumstances beyond the control of the Corporation. The Corporation is therefore subject to risk of loss. The Corporation believes its lending policies and procedures adequately minimize the potential exposure to such risks and that adequate provisions for loan losses are provided for all known and inherent risks. Collateral and/or personal guarantees are required for virtually all loans.
NOTE 7 — BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Bank premises and equipment are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
               
Land
 
$
3,447
    
$
3,447
 
Buildings
 
 
13,773
 
 
12,657
 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
 
 
14,079
 
 
13,654
 
Leasehold improvements
 
 
1,812
 
 
1,457
 
Subtotal
 
 
33,111
 
 
31,215
 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
 
 
14,768
 
 
13,593
 
Total
 
$
18,343
 
$
17,622
 
Depreciation expense for the three years ended December 31, 2005 amounted to $1,752,000 in 2005, $1,580,000 in 2004 and $1,412,000 in 2003, respectively.


58


NOTE 8 — BORROWED FUNDS
Short-term borrowings at December 31, 2005 and 2004 consisted of the following:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 2005
 
 2004
 
               
Overnight Federal Funds Purchased
 
$
40,000
    
$
 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
 
 
58,193
 
 
84,757
 
Federal Home Loan Bank short-term and overnight advances
 
 
23,900
 
 
16,600
 
Total Short-Term Borrowings
 
$
122,093
 
$
101,357
 
The weighted average interest rate for short-term borrowings at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was 3.24 percent and 1.74 percent, respectively.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004 long-term borrowings consisted of the following:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 2005
 
2004
 
               
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
 
$
154,370
    
$
100,000
 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
 
 
17,500
 
 
15,000
 
Total Long-Term Borrowings
 
$
171,870
 
$
115,000
 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase had average balances of $119.1 million and $105.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The maximum amount outstanding at any month end during 2005 and 2004 was $160,842,000 and $131,791,000. The average interest rate paid on securities sold under agreements to repurchase were 2.65 percent and 0.81 percent for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Overnight federal funds purchased averaged $27.6 million during 2005 as compared to $0 outstanding in 2004.
The weighted average interest rates on Federal Home Loan Bank advances at December 31, 2005 and 2004 were 4.11 percent and 2.38 percent, respectively. The maximum amount outstanding at any month end during 2005 and 2004 was $168,682,916 and $140,000,000, respectively. The average interest rate paid on Federal Home Loan Bank advances were 4.13 percent and 3.97 percent for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, all advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) amounted to $157.4 million and $100.0 million, respectively. The FHLB advances had a weighted average interest rate of 4.08 percent and 4.28 percent at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. These advances are secured by pledges of FHLB stock, 1-4 family residential mortgages and U.S. Government and Federal Agency obligations. The advances are subject to quarterly call provisions at the discretion of the FHLB and at December 31, 2005, and 2004 are contractually scheduled for repayment as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
               
2006
 
$
3,000
    
$
 
2007
 
 
2,000
 
 
5,000
 
2008
 
 
1,644
 
 
 
2009
 
 
25,000
 
 
25,000
 
2010
 
 
65,726
 
 
50,000
 
2011
 
 
10,000
 
 
10,000
 
2012
 
 
5,000
 
 
 
2013
 
 
 
 
10,000
 
2015
 
 
45,000
 
 
 
Total:
 
$
157,370
 
$
100,000
 



59


[v036625ex13022.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 8 — BORROWED FUNDSContinued
The securities sold under repurchase agreements to other counterparties included in long-term debt totaled $17.5 million at December 31, 2005 and $15.0 million at December 31, 2004. The weighted average rate at December 31, 2005 was 3.53 and 1.61 percent, respectively. The schedule for repayment is as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
               
2007
 
$
    
$
15,000
 
2008
 
 
17,500
 
 
 
Total:
 
$
17,500
 
$
15,000
 
NOTE 9 — PENSION AND BENEFITS
The Corporation maintains a non-contributory pension plan for substantially all of its employees. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s compensation over the prior five-year period. The plan’s assets consist primarily of an insurance annuity. In addition, the Corporation has a non-qualified retirement plan that is designed to supplement the pension plan for key employees.
In 1999, the Corporation adopted a Director’s Retirement Plan, which is designed to provide retirement benefits for members of the Board of Directors. The expense associated with the plan amounted to $76,000 in 2005, $93,000 in 2004 and $63,000 for 2003, and is included in non-interest expense.
The following table sets forth changes in projected benefit obligation, changes in fair value of plan assets, funded status, and amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of condition for the Corporation’s pension plans at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Change in Benefit Obligation (Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
               
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
 
$
10,146
    
$
9,127
 
Service cost
 
 
776
 
 
705
 
Interest cost
 
 
599
 
 
561
 
Actuarial loss (gain)
 
 
(444
)
 
3
 
Benefits paid
 
 
(280
)
 
(250
)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
 
$
10,797
 
$
10,146
 
Change in Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning year
 
$
6,599
 
$
5,473
 
Actual return on plan assets
 
 
313
 
 
616
 
Employer contributions
 
 
700
 
 
760
 
Benefits paid
 
 
(280
)
 
(250
)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
 
$
7,332
 
$
6,599
 
Funded status
 
$
(3,465
)
$
(3,547
)
Unrecognized net asset
 
 
 
 
 
Unrecognized prior service cost
 
 
36
 
 
51
 
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
 
 
1,248
 
 
1,568
 
Accrued benefit cost
 
$
(2,181
)
$
(1,928
)



60


The net periodic pension cost for 2005, 2004 and 2003 includes the following components:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
Service cost
 
$
796
    
$
725
    
$
676
 
Interest cost
 
 
599
 
 
561
 
 
507
 
Expected return on plan assets
 
 
(533
)
 
(442
)
 
(386
)
Net amortization and deferral
 
 
91
 
 
97
 
 
157
 
Net periodic pension expense
 
$
953
 
$
941
 
$
954
 
The following table presents the assumptions used to calculate the projected benefit obligation in each of the last three years.
 
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
Discount rate
 
 
5.75
%  
 
6.00
%  
 
6.25
%
Rate of compensation increase
 
 
4.25
%
 
4.50
%
 
4.75
%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
 
 
7.50
%
 
7.50
%
 
8.00
%
The following information is provided:
At December 31,
 
2005
 
2004
 
       
INFORMATION FOR PLANS WITH AN ACCUMULATED
BENEFIT OBLIGATION IN EXCESS OF PLAN ASSETS
 
 
 
Projected benefit obligation
 
$
10,797
    
$
10,146
 
Accumulated benefit obligation
 
 
8,962
 
 
7,853
 
Fair value of plan assets
 
 
7,332
 
 
6,599
 
ASSUMPTIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average assumptions used to determine
benefit obligation at December 31
 
 
2005
 
 
2004
 
Discount rate
 
 
5.75
%
 
6.00
%
Rate of compensation increase
 
 
4.25
%
 
4.50
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average assumptions used to determine
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost for years ended December 31
 
 
2005
 
 
2004
 
Discount rate
 
 
6.00
%
 
6.25
%
Expected long-term return on plan assets
 
 
7.50
%
 
7.50
%
Rate of compensation increase
 
 
4.50
%
 
4.75
%
The process of determining the overall expected long-term rate of return on plan assets begins with a review of appropriate investment data, including current yields on fixed income securities, historical investment data, historical plan performance and forecasts of inflation and future total returns for the various asset classes. This data forms the basis for the construction of a best-estimate range of real investment return for each asset class. An average, weighted real-return range is computed reflecting the Plan’s expected asset mix, and that range, when combined with an expected inflation range produces an overall best-estimate expected return range. Specific factors such as the Plan’s investment policy, reinvestment risk and investment volatility are taken into consideration during the construction of the best estimate real return range, as well as in the selection of the final return assumption from within the range.


61


[v036625ex13023.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 9 — PENSION AND BENEFITSContinued
Plan Assets
The Union Center National Bank Pension Trust’s weighted-average asset allocation at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, by asset category, is as follows:
Asset Category
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
Equity securities
 
 
76
%
 
79
%
 
79
%
Debt and/or Fixed Income Securities
 
 
23
%
 
20
%
 
20
%
Other
 
 
1
%
 
1
%
 
1
%
Total
 
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
The general investment policy of the Pension Trust is for the fund to experience growth in assets that will allow the market value to exceed the value of benefit obligations over time. Appropriate diversification on a total fund basis is achieved by following an allowable range of commitment within asset category, as follows;
 
 
Range
 
Target
 
               
Equity securities
 
 
15-80
%  
 
75
%
Debt and/or Fixed Income Securities
 
 
20-65
%
 
25
%
International Equity
 
 
0-10
%
 
0
%
Short Term
 
 
10-40
%
 
0-5
%
The investment manager is not authorized to purchase, acquire or otherwise hold certain types of market securities (subordinated bonds, commodities, real estate investment trusts, limited partnerships, naked puts, naked calls, stock index futures, oil, gas or mineral exploration ventures or unregistered securities) or to employ certain types of market techniques (margin purchases or short sales) or to mortgage, pledge, hypothecate, or in any manner transfer as security for indebtedness, any security owned or held by the Plan.
Cash Flows
Contributions
The Bank expects to contribute $750,000 to its Pension Trust in 2006.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, that are expected to be paid in each year 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and years 2011-2015, respectively are $287,200, $328,900, $568,800, $651,900, $690,500 and $4,682,700.
401K Benefit Plan
The Corporation maintains a 401K employee savings plan to provide for defined contributions which covers substantially all employees of the Corporation. The Corporation’s contributions to the plan are limited to fifty percent of a matching percentage of each employee’s contribution up to six percent of the employee’s salary. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, employer contributions amounted to $134,367, $124,000 and $115,000, respectively.
Stock Option Plans
The Corporation’s Stock Option Plans permit Center Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be issued to key employees and directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The options granted under the plans are intended to


62


be either Incentive Stock Options or Non-qualified Options. Under the 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, an aggregate of 217,285 shares remain available under the plan and are authorized for issuance. Under the 2003 non-employee director stock option plan an aggregate total of 486,670 shares remain. Such shares may be treasury shares, newly issued shares or a combination thereof. This Plan also authorizes the grant of restricted stock awards.
Options have been granted to purchase common stock principally at the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. Options are exercisable starting one year after the date of grant and generally expire ten years from the date of grant. Changes in options outstanding during the past three years were as follows:
Stock Option Plan
 
 Shares
 
Exercise Price
Range
Per Share
 
             
Outstanding, December 31, 2002 (198,126 shares exercisable)                                       
 
 
302,405
      
$4.51 to $9.42
 
Granted during 2003
 
 
37,990
 
$15.88
 
Exercised during 2003
 
 
(76,839
)
$4.51 to $9.45
 
Expired or canceled during 2003
 
 
(2,053
)
$4.86 to $6.37
 
Outstanding, December 31, 2003 (176,867 shares exercisable)
 
 
261,503
 
$4.51 to $15.88
 
Granted during 2004
 
 
34,650
 
$11.03
 
Exercised during 2004
 
 
(55,135
)
$4.51 to $6.37
 
Expired or canceled during 2004
 
 
(3,835
)
$6.37
 
Outstanding, December 31, 2004 (170,059 shares exercisable)
 
 
237,183
 
$4.51 to $15.88
 
Granted during 2005
 
 
152,854
 
$6.42 to $11.19
 
Exercised during 2005
 
 
(12,138
)
$4.51 to $6.38
 
Expired or canceled during 2005
 
 
(5
)
$6.37
 
Outstanding, December 31, 2005 (308,520 shares exercisable)
 
 
377,894
 
$5.41 to $15.88
 
Fair Value of Stock Options Grants
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively: dividend rate of 3.08%, 2.73%, 2.73%; expected volatility of 30.1%, 35.80% and 35.8%; risk-free interest rate based on equivalent Treasury Rates of 3.90%, 4.11% and 3.51%; and expected lives of 6 years. During the second quarter of 2005, options to purchase 56,266 shares of Red Oak Bank common stock were converted into options to purchase 54,514 shares of Center Bancorp common stock pursuant to the acquisition of Red Oak Bank in May 2005. The options issued in the Red Oak Bank acquisition are fully vested.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the stock options granted during the last three years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
 
 
2005 
 
2004 
 
2003 
 
 
 
Options
Granted
 
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
 
Options
Granted
 
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
 
Options
Granted
 
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
 
                                       
Incentive stock options
 
 
54,514
    
$
4.98
    
 
    
$
0.00
    
 
    
$
0.00
 
Non-qualifying stock options
 
 
65,260
 
$
3.28
 
 
 
$
0.00
 
 
 
$
0.00
 
Director’s plan
 
 
33,080
 
$
3.28
 
 
34,650
 
$
3.43
 
 
37,990
 
$
5.30
 
Total
 
 
152,854
 
$
4.07
 
 
34,650
 
$
3.43
 
 
37,990
 
$
5.30
 
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock may be awarded to key employees providing for the immediate award of the Corporation’s common stock subject to certain vesting and other restrictions. During 2005, 8,095 shares were awarded and during 2004, no shares were awarded. During 2002, 11,000 shares were awarded; all such shares were issued from Treasury shares. The amount of compensation costs related to restricted stock awards included in salary expense was approximately $105,000 in 2005, $14,000, in 2004 and $271,000 in 2003. As of December 31, 2005, all shares of the prior restricted stock awards were vested.


63


[v036625ex13024.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 10 — INCOME TAXES
The current and deferred amounts of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, are as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
CURRENT:
                   
Federal
                          
  
(2,266
)    
$
1,354
     
$
1,312
 
State
   
(1,178
)
 
164
   
262
 
     
(3,444
)
 
1,518
   
1,574
 
DEFERRED:
                   
Federal
   
3,778
   
341
   
248
 
State
   
850
   
(235
)
 
(659
)
     
4,628
   
106
   
(411
)
Income tax expense
   
1,184
 
$
1,624
 
$
1,163
 
The amount of deferred income tax (benefit) expense included in comprehensive income was ($2,327,000), $306,000 and $424,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Reconciliation between the amount of reported income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate is as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
                     
Income before income tax expense
     
 
8,830
     
$
9,246
     
$
7,582
 
Federal statutory rate
   
34
%
 
34
%
 
34
%
Compute “expected” Federal income tax expense
   
3,002
   
3,144
   
2,578
 
State tax net of Federal tax benefit
   
(216
)
 
(47
)
 
(262
)
Bank owned life insurance
   
(252
)
 
(249
)
 
(271
)
Tax-exempt interest and dividends
   
(1,206
)
 
(1,235
)
 
(971
)
Other, net
   
(144
)
 
11
   
89
 
Income tax expense
 
$
1,184
 
$
1,624
 
$
1,163
 



64


The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are presented below:
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
     2005     
 
     2004     
             
Deferred tax assets:
           
Allowance for loan losses
        
$
1,550
     
$
1,280
Pension expense
   
482
   
972
Employee benefit plan
   
783
   
514
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale and other comprehensive income
   
2,327
   
Other
   
316
   
Federal NOL
   
1,480
   
NJ NOL and AMA credits
   
871
   
545
Total gross deferred tax asset
 
$
7,809
 
$
3,311
Deferred tax liabilities:
           
Depreciation
 
$
412
 
$
599
Market discount accretion
   
581
   
678
Deferred fee expense-mortgages
   
599
   
487
Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale and other comprehensive income
   
   
306
Purchase accounting
   
504
   
Other
   
120
   
276
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
   
2,216
   
2,346
Net deferred tax asset
 
$
5,593
 
$
965
Based on the Corporation’s historical and current pre-tax earnings and the availability of net operating loss carry-backs on a Federal basis, management believes it is more likely than not that the Corporation will realize the benefit of the net deductible temporary differences existing at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
NOTE 11 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Authorized capital of the Corporation includes 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock no par value, none of which was issued at December 3, 2005 or 2004.
As of December 31, 2005, the Corporation has purchased 57,330 common shares at an average cost per share of $9.38 under the stock buyback program announced on January 24, 2002 for the repurchase of up to 266,254 shares of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock adjusted for subsequent stock dividends and stock splits. The repurchased shares were recorded as Treasury Stock, which resulted in a decrease in stockholders’ equity.
On June 30, 2005, the Corporation issued 1,904,761 shares of the holding company’s common stock to a limited number of accredited investors in a private placement of its securities. The shares were issued at a purchase price of $10.50 per share. Net proceeds to the holding company were approximately $18.9 million, after commissions and expenses.
On September 29, 2004, the Corporation issued 888,888 shares of the holding company’s common stock to a limited number of accredited investors in a private placement of its securities. The shares were issued at a purchase price of $11.25 per share. Net proceeds to the holding company were approximately $9.4 million, after commissions and expenses.
Regulatory Capital
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) regulations require banks to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Under the regulations in effect at December 31, 2005, the Bank was required to maintain (i) a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total adjusted assets of 4.00%, and (ii) minimum ratios of Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.00% and 8.00%, respectively.
Under its prompt corrective action regulations, the FDIC is required to take certain supervisory actions (and on discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on the institution’s financial statements. The regulations establish a framework for the classification of financial institutions into five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly


65


[v036625ex13025.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 11 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTSContinued
undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is considered well capitalized if it has a leverage (Tier 1) capital ratio of at least 5.00%; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.00%; and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.00%.
The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the FDIC about capital components, risk weightings and other factors.
As of December 31, 2005, management believes that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject and is a well-capitalized institution under the prompt corrective action regulations.
The following is a summary of the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, compared to the FDIC minimum capital adequacy requirements and the FDIC requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution.
   
FDIC Requirements
 
   
Union Center
National
Bank Actual
 
Minimum Capital
Adequacy
 
For Classification
as Well Capitalized
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
                                                                          
     
                                   
December 31, 2005 Leverage (Tier 1) capital
 
$
82,379
     
  
7.43
%   
$
45,221
     
  
4.00
%   
$
55,654
     
  
5.00
%
RISK-BASED CAPITAL:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1
 
 
82,379
 
 
12.82
%
 
25,698
 
 
4.00
%
 
38,547
 
 
6.00
%
Total
   
87,316
   
13.59
%
 
51,397
   
8.00
%
 
64,246
   
10.00
%
December 31, 2004 Leverage (Tier 1) capital
 
$
68,793
 
 
7.02
%
$
39,263
 
 
4.00
%
$
48,974
 
 
5.00
%
RISK-BASED CAPITAL:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1
 
 
68,793
 
 
12.09
%
 
22,761
 
 
4.00
%
 
34,141
 
 
6.00
%
Total
   
72,574
   
12.75
%
 
45,521
   
8.00
%
 
56,902
   
10.00
%

   
Center Bancorp, Inc.
Actual
 
Minimum Capital
Adequacy
 
For Classification
as Well Capitalized
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
                                                                          
     
                       
December 31, 2005 Leverage (Tier 1) capital
  
$
102,159
     
  
9.07
%   
$
45,913
     
  
4.00
%   
$
56,519
     
  
5.00
%
RISK-BASED CAPITAL:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1
 
 
102,159
 
 
15.51
%
 
26,340
 
 
4.00
%
 
39,509
 
 
6.00
%
Total
   
107,096
   
16.26
%
 
52,679
   
8.00
%
 
65,849
   
10.00
%
December 31, 2004 Leverage (Tier 1) capital
 
$
81,490
 
 
8.22
%
$
39,725
 
 
4.00
%
$
49,552
 
 
5.00
%
RISK-BASED CAPITAL:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1
 
 
81,490
 
 
14.03
%
 
23,234
 
 
4.00
%
 
34,851
 
 
6.00
%
Total
   
85,271
   
14.68
%
 
46,468
   
8.00
%
 
58,085
   
10.00
%
The Corporation issued $10.3 million in 2001 and $5.2 million in 2003 of subordinated debentures. These securities are included as a component of Tier 1 Capital for regulatory purposes. The Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 8.22 percent at December 31, 2005.
On March 1, 2005, the Federal Reserve adopted a final rule that allows the continued inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred securities in the Tier I Capital of bank holding companies, subject to stricter quantitative limits and qualitative standards. The new quantitative limits become effective after a five-year transition period ending March 31, 2009. Under the final rules, trust preferred securities and other restricted core


66


capital elements are limited to 25% of all core capital elements. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of these limits may be included in Tier II Capital. At December 31, 2005, the only restricted core capital element owned by the Corporation is trust preferred securities. Based on a preliminary review of the final rule, the Corporation believes that its trust preferred issues qualify as Tier I Capital. However, in the event that the trust preferred issues do not qualify as Tier I Capital, the Corporation would remain well capitalized.
NOTE 12 — SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
During 2001 and 2003, the Corporation formed statutory business trusts, which exist for the exclusive purpose of (i) issuing Trust Securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the Trust; (ii) investing the gross proceeds of the Trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of the Corporation; and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. These subordinated debentures and the related income effects are not eliminated in the consolidated financial statements as the statutory business trusts are not consolidated in accordance with FASB interpretation No.46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Distributions on the subordinated debentures owned by the subsidiary trusts below have been classified as interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The following table summarizes the mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities of the Corporation’s subsidiary trusts at December 31, 2005.
Issuance
Date
 
Securities
Issued
 
Liquidation
Value
 
Coupon
Rate
 
Maturity
 
Redeemable By Issuer Beginning
                          
 
                          
 
                          
 
                          
 
                          
 
                          
12/18/01
 
$10,000,000
 
$1,000 per Capital Security
 
Floating 3-month LIBOR + 360 Basis Points
 
12/18/2031
 
12/18/2006
                     
Issuance
Date
 
Securities
Issued
 
Liquidation
Value
 
Coupon
Rate
 
Maturity
 
Redeemable By Issuer Beginning
                     
12/19/03
 
$5,000,000
 
$1,000 per Capital Security
 
Floating 3-month LIBOR + 285 Basis Points
 
01/23/2034
 
01/23/2009
NOTE 13 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (SFAS 107), requires that the Corporation disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Corporation’s financial instruments:
The carrying amounts for cash and cash-equivalents approximate fair value because they mature in 90 days or less and do not present unanticipated credit concerns. The fair value of investment securities is estimated based on bid quotations received from securities dealers. Stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank is carried at cost.
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, real estate-mortgage, and installment loans.
The fair value of performing loans, except residential mortgages, is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the historical experience of the Bank with prepayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions. For performing residential mortgage loans, fair value is estimated by discounting contractual cash flows adjusted for prepayment estimates using discount rates based on secondary market sources adjusted to reflect differences in servicing and credit costs.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings and interest-bearing checking accounts, and money market and checking accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.


67


[v036625ex13026.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 13 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTSContinued
Short-term borrowings that mature within six months have fair values equal to their carrying value.
The fair value of FHLB advances is based on the discounted value of estimated cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for similar advances.
The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using market discount rates of financial instruments with similar characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.
The fair value of commitments to extend credits estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rate and the committed rates. The fair value of financial standby letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties. The fair values related to commitment and letters of credit are deemed immaterial and omitted from the disclosure below.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Corporation’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.
Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on-and-off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include deferred tax assets and liabilities, goodwill, and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered.


68


The estimated fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments is as follows:
   
December 31,
   
2005
 
2004
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair
Value
     
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
                       
Cash and cash equivalents
                    
$
19,343
     
$
19,343
     
$
12,033
     
$
12,033
Investments available-for-sale
   
388,170
   
388,170
   
453,524
   
453,524
Investments held to maturity
   
140,514
   
140,628
   
124,162
   
127,898
Net loans
   
500,889
   
492,267
   
373,523
   
371,910
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
                       
Non-interest-bearing deposits
   
139,911
   
139,911
   
127,226
   
127,226
Interest-bearing deposits
   
560,690
   
559,571
   
575,046
   
575,276
Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase and FHLB advances
   
293,963
   
295,035
   
216,357
   
220,935
Subordinated debentures
   
  15,465
   
  15,465
   
  15,465
   
  15,465


69


[v036625ex13027.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 14 — PARENT CORPORATION ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Center Bancorp, Inc. operates its wholly owned subsidiary, Union Center National Bank. The earnings of this subsidiary is recognized by the Corporation using the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, earnings are recorded as increases in the Corporation’s investment in the subsidiaries and dividends paid reduce the investment in the subsidiaries. The ability of the Corporation to pay dividends will largely depend upon the dividends paid to it by the Bank. Dividends payable by the Bank to the Corporation are restricted under supervisory regulations (see Note 15).
Condensed financial statements of the Parent Corporation only are as follows:
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
   
At December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
             
ASSETS
                        
   
     
   
Cash and cash equivalents

$
 3,330
 
$
306
Investment in subsidiary

 
95,113
   
71,411
Securities available for sale

 
15,236
   
11,094
Other assets

 
2,095
   
1,656
Total assets

$
115,774
 
$
84,467
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
           
Other liabilities

$
820
 
$
359
Subordinated debentures

 
15,465
   
15,465
Stockholders’ equity

 
99,489
   
68,643
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$
115,774
 
$
84,467
 

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
For Years Ended December 31,
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
Income
             
Dividend income from subsidiary
                            
$
6,055
     
$
3,238
 
Other income

 
334
   
78
 
Management fees

 
315
   
227
 
Total Income

 
6,704
   
3,543
 
Expenses

 
(1,357
)
 
(1,087
)
Net income before equity in earnings of subsidiary

 
5,347
   
2,456
 
Undistributed equity in earnings of subsidiary

 
2,299
   
5,166
 
Net Income

$
7,646
 
$
7,622
 
 


70



CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 

For Years Ended December 31
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
Operating Activities:
                   
Net income
                  
$
7,646
     
$
7,622
     
$
6,419
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
                   
Undistributed equity in earnings of subsidiary
   
(2,299
)
 
(5,166
)
 
(3,881
)
Increase in other assets
   
(439
)
 
(117
)
 
(569
)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
   
459
   
(282
)
 
(177
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
   
5,367
   
2,057
   
1,792
 
Investing Activities:
                   
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
   
(46,635
)
 
(11,094
)
 
0
 
Maturity of available-for-sale securities
   
42,585
   
0
   
0
 
Cash consideration paid to acquire Red Oak Bank
   
(13,279
)
 
0
   
0
 
Investments in subsidiaries
   
0
   
(4,000
)
 
(3,000
)
Net cash used in investing activities
   
(17,329
)
 
(15,094
)
 
(3,000
)
Financing Activities:
                   
Cash dividends
   
(4,518
)
 
(3,238
)
 
(3,014
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
   
399
   
559
   
662
 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
   
19,105
   
9,815
   
421
 
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures
   
0
   
0
   
5,465
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
14,986
   
7,136
   
3,534
 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
   
3,024
   
(5,901
)
 
2,326
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
   
306
   
6,207
   
3,881
 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year
 
$
3,330
 
$
306
 
$
6,207
 
NOTE 15 — DIVIDENDS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS
Certain restrictions, including capital requirements, exist on the availability of undistributed net profits of the Bank for the future payment of dividends to the Corporation. A dividend may not be paid if it would impair the capital of the Bank. Furthermore, prior approval by the Comptroller of the Currency is required if the total of dividends declared in a calendar year exceeds the total of the Bank’s net profits for that year combined with the retained profits for the two preceding years. At December 31, 2005, approximately$17.4 million was available for the payment of dividends.
NOTE 16 — COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
In the normal course of business, the Corporation has outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities such as commitments to extend credit, including loan commitments of $12.2 million ($11.9 million subject to variable rate indices and $0.3 million fixed rate commitments) as of December 31, 2005. Standby letters of credit, which are not reflected in the accompanying, consolidated financial statements, totaled $17.8 million and $14.8 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit generally do not exceed one year. These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The commitment or contract amount of these financial instruments is an indicator of the Corporation’s level of involvement in each type of instrument as well as the exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument.
The Corporation controls the credit risk of these financial instruments through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. To minimize potential credit risk, the Corporation generally requires collateral and other credit-related terms and conditions from the customer. In the opinion of management, the financial condition of the Corporation will not be materially affected by the final outcome of these commitments and contingent liabilities.



71


[v036625ex13028.jpg]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
NOTE 16 — COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISKContinued
A substantial portion of the Bank’s loans is represented by one to four family residential first mortgage loans secured by real estate located in New Jersey. Accordingly, the collectability of a substantial portion of the loan portfolio of the Bank is susceptible to changes in the real estate market.
In October 2004, the Corporation’s subsidiary Union Center National Bank, entered into an agreement to purchase a future banking site at 44 North Avenue, Cranford, New Jersey, 07016 for a purchase price of $1,400,000. In October 2005, Union Center National Bank entered into a lease rental agreement for property located at 209 Ridgedale Avenue, Florham Park, New Jersey for a new branch location.
Other expenses include rentals for premises and equipment of $534,537 in 2005, $401,616 in 2004 and $393,740 in 2003. At December 31, 2005, Center Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary were obligated under a number of non-cancelable leases for premises and equipment, many of which provide for increased rentals based upon increases in real estate taxes and the cost of living index. These leases, most of which have renewal provisions, are principally operating leases. Minimum rentals under the terms of these leases for the years 2006 through 2010 are $605,508, $620,080, $650,263, $674,404 and $691,310, respectively. Minimum rentals due 2011 and after are $2,621,971.
The Corporation is subject to claims and lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of business. Based upon the information currently available and advice received from legal counsel representing the Corporation in connection with such claims, it is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate determination of such claims will not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Corporation.


72


NOTE 17 — QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CENTER BANCORP, INC. (unaudited)
   
2005
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
4th Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
1st Quarter
     
Total interest income
     
$
13,636
     
$
13,574
     
$
12,337
     
$
10,956
Total interest expense
   
6,848
   
6,419
   
5,488
   
4,541
Net interest income
   
6,788
   
7,155
   
6,849
   
6,415
Provision for loan losses
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
Other income
   
798
   
1,296
   
914
   
828
Other expense
   
5,514
   
5,937
   
5,423
   
5,339
Income before income taxes
   
2,072
   
2,514
   
2,340
   
1,904
Net income
   
1,932
   
2,036
   
1,933
   
1,745
Earnings per share:
                       
Basic
 
$
0.14
 
$
0.15
 
$
0.18
 
$
0.17
Diluted
 
$
0.14
 
$
0.15
 
$
0.18
 
$
0.17
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                       
Basic
   
13,429,606
   
13,427,251
   
10,962,507
   
10,432,315
Diluted
   
13,471,205
   
13,472,086
   
11,005,043
   
10,477,434
 
   
2004
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
4th Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
1st Quarter
     
Total interest income
 
$
10,626
 
$
10,121
 
$
9,732
 
$
9,570
Total interest expense
   
4,017
   
3,531
   
3,233
   
3,187
Net interest income
   
6,609
   
6,590
   
6,499
   
6,383
Provision for loan losses
   
137
   
205
   
205
   
205
Other income
   
845
   
839
   
821
   
883
Other expense
   
4,826
   
4,750
   
4,904
   
4,991
Income before income taxes
   
2,491
   
2,474
   
2,211
   
2,070
Net income
   
2,099
   
2,017
   
1,782
   
1,724
Earnings per share:
                       
Basic
 
$
0.20
 
$
0.21
 
$
0.19
 
$
0.18
Diluted
 
$
0.20
 
$
0.21
 
$
0.19
 
$
0.18
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                       
Basic
   
10,413,147
   
9,485,531
   
9,422,960
   
9,397,880
Diluted
   
10,457,061
   
9,529,997
   
9,482,201
   
9,481,565



73


[v036625ex13029.jpg]
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Center Bancorp, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 8, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and an adverse opinion on the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 8, 2006


74


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Corporation’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Corporation’s internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management, Board of Directors and shareholders regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Corporation; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As part of the Corporation’s program to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management used the control criteria framework of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission published in its report entitled Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on the Corporation’s assessment, a material weakness was identified in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As a result of its assessment, the Corporation has identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 related to accounting for income taxes. Specifically, the Corporation did not employ an adequate number of skilled personnel in its tax department to prepare the reconciliation of internal tax schedules to the general ledger and supporting documentation in a timely manner, and there was inadequate and ineffective analysis and management review of the relevant documentation supporting the deferred tax accounts related to the accounting for an acquisition of a business. As a result, material misstatements were identified in the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities and income tax expense accounts that were corrected prior to the issuance of the 2005 consolidated financial statements. Further, there was more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the Corporation’s interim or annual financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
Because of the material weakness described above, management concluded that the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2005. The independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements has issued an audit report on management’s assessment of, and the effectiveness of, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. This report appears on page 82.
CENTER BANCORP, INC.
  
 
     
/s/ JOHN J. DAVIS
   
John J. Davis
 
Date: March 8, 2006
President and Chief Executive Officer
   
     
 /s/ ANTHONY C. WEAGLEY
   
Anthony C. Weagley
 
Date: March 8, 2006
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
   



75


[v036625ex13030.jpg]
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Stockholders Center Bancorp, Inc.:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Corporation) did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, because of the effect of a material weakness identified in management’s assessment, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As a result of its assessment, the Corporation has identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 related to accounting for income taxes. Specifically, the Corporation did not employ an adequate number of skilled personnel in its tax department to prepare the reconciliation of internal tax schedules to the general ledger and supporting documentation in a timely manner, and there was inadequate and ineffective analysis and management review of the relevant documentation supporting the deferred tax accounts related to the accounting for an acquisition of a business. As a result, material misstatements were identified in the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities and income tax expense accounts. Further, there was more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the Corporation’s interim or annual financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005. The aforementioned material


76


weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2005 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 8, 2006, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Corporation has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 8, 2006


77


[v036625ex13031.jpg]
Corporate Headquarters
Center Bancorp, Inc.
2455 Morris Avenue
Union, NJ 07083
1-800-862-3683
www.centerbancorp.com
www.ucnb.com
Annual Shareholders’ Meeting
The annual shareholders’ meeting of Center Bancorp, Inc. will be held at 10:00 A.M. on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 at Suburban Golf Club, 1730 Morris Avenue, Union, New Jersey.
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
Center Bancorp, Inc. offers its shareholders a convenient plan to increase their investment in the Company. Through the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, holders of stock may have their quarterly dividends automatically reinvested in additional common shares without brokerage fees, commissions or service charges. Shareholders not enrolled in this plan, as well as brokers and custodians who hold stock in Center Bancorp, Inc., may enroll in the plan by contacting Anthony C. Weagley, Vice President and Treasurer, 1-800-862-3683.
Financial Information and Form 10K
Persons may obtain a copy, free of charge, of the Center Bancorp, Inc. 2005 Annual Report and Form 10-K (excluding exhibits) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors, security analysts and others desiring financial information or a copy of such report should contact:
Anthony C. Weagley
Vice President and Treasurer
1-800-862-3683
Shareholder Inquiries
For information regarding your shares of common stock of Center Bancorp, Inc., please contact:
Anthony C. Weagley
Vice President and Treasurer
1-800-862-3683
Stock Listing
NASDAQ Stock Market – CNBC
Center Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the Symbol CNBC. Daily stock quotes appear in some newspapers under: CtrBcp, CenterBc, and CenterBcp.
Registrar and Transfer Agent
Registrar and Transfer Company
10 Commerce Drive
Cranford, New Jersey 07016


78

GRAPHIC 4 v036625ex13001.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13001.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 5 v036625ex13002.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13002.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 6 v036625ex13003.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13003.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 7 v036625ex13004.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13004.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 8 v036625ex13005.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13005.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 9 v036625ex13006.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13006.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 10 v036625ex13007.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13007.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 11 v036625ex13008.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13008.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 12 v036625ex13009.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13009.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 13 v036625ex13010.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13010.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 14 v036625ex13011.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13011.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 15 v036625ex13012.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13012.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 16 v036625ex13013.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13013.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 17 v036625ex13014.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13014.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 18 v036625ex13015.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13015.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 19 v036625ex13016.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13016.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 20 v036625ex13017.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13017.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 21 v036625ex13018.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13018.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 22 v036625ex13019.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13019.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 23 v036625ex13020.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13020.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 24 v036625ex13021.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13021.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 25 v036625ex13022.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13022.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 26 v036625ex13023.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13023.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 27 v036625ex13024.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13024.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 28 v036625ex13025.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13025.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 29 v036625ex13026.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13026.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 30 v036625ex13027.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13027.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 31 v036625ex13028.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13028.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 32 v036625ex13029.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13029.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 33 v036625ex13030.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13030.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J GRAPHIC 34 v036625ex13031.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 v036625ex13031.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^BBL/Q1= M?\4SJBVLRF=8&R$;+`=^GMFDW97-*5-U)J*ZE*]^(6@65V;?SI9BIPSPIN4' MZYY_#-;VG:E9ZM9K=V4ZS0MQD=CZ$=C7G?@G3_#%UX=N9-2^S-<9GP8T M[$>@]QWIWPSE$%[JVV;%@-N&D.!G)VGTSC.:PA5DVK]3UL3@*$:=3V?,G"U[ M[._8]-HIJ2)*@>-U=3T*G(IU=!XH4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'$?$G6KG3=,MK2UD:)KMGWNIP=JXR,]L[A M^58%YX"N=%T:/5K;4U%Y#M=@2L:C)`X9B!QGOU_2NX\6>&T\2:6(!((KB)M\ M+D9&>X/L?\*X2\\/>*5TTP:Q?%-(M1NVV5'&=XDC8GG[S84Y/MCT%,T>SO]5N)-0\.O\`9-2B&+BW4[%.?XES MQ@DAZ=L9)+33_`()WRE.*G[Z5MNO*[+?7Y7UMMZZ&FI=>"O'=OI2W1GM+ MMD4KC&0YV@D=B#W]/K7JM<%X;\&ZDFN#6M?N!+#F=6%2I'E:E)+5K9L\^N]2D\1?%A_"\DLJ:9IME]JGA1BHN)"4P&( MZJ`XXZ$]M5=7\*S2> M*K7Q/I%Q'!J441@GCF4F*YB_NL1RI!Q\PST'!Q4MWI>L>((I;35Q:6=A)!+% M)#9W#S-(77:"6*)@`%CC!YP<\5L>:9^D_$*VU?4;*"WLUE@OXW>W>VN5E=&4 M;MDR@`1,0>`6/IQ5'_A:2-X9@\2+H=P-(>Y\B69YT#QC.W<$&=W/;C\:U_"V ME>*-#TV/3+VZTRZM;*/RK5HU=))4`PH><]L?KVH`W-0\0:\GQ9L]"MH[5K#^SS*.ZBLKD6UULN!YX8D`LD."752<$Y'(., MXJS=^&]3E\>:?XG@DM$9+$V=S!(S-M&XMN0@#/)[XZ5#I7AC7?#^OZD=+O;` MZ-J5TUY(DZ.9H)&QNV8.&!QW/''![@"W/CJX'B'4M$T_P[>7UY8&+S0DJ*-K M@'=DGI@CCK[=2*WQB@BD^&.J2/$C/$83&S*"4)F0$@]N"1^-7-'\.ZM8?$+7 M=>G%D;/4UB152=S(GEH%!(*`'./7CWJSX^T'4/$_A"[T;3C;++PY%1W7A/4-;U/PY=:F]K M;1Z*PE"6TC2-+(`N/F*KM7*],'-8NH_#O7KXW!?5+*>3^VX]2@FG5S(8UR!$ MQ[!03@#(SZ9H`Z2Z\82KXLN?#EGH\]Q>PV9NPS3)&C+N`'.21DGTS[=Q%IGQ M`T[4?">GZXT,D+7UPMI#:E@6:K1^!;#2)KVUM]4TN^^VV=S`[21E]Q. M&!52!SVST_"@#JM1\5W&B1HNK:8L=QK^%-<\2:?IMQJEY80:Q MIMU'=6_V5',.Y3DABWS$'`Z8QCO5V/PU=S>,3XJO!;B\AL?L=M:QRL4'S,Q9 MG*@\[B.%X'K0!7\->.KCQ0MM<6/AV\%A,)=UT\J`(RYPN,Y)..O09'7G%`?% M`-X:M_$JZ%,9'XUJ_#OPYJ7A3PM'I&I&T=XI& M99+:5F#;B3R&5<8_&N(^'NA77BCX4PZ-'M9?XG0>)8TL#91 MV/V(HUPXD(W%M^/+QWQC/XT`5IOB-(;#7+RTT"XEBT6Y:"Z,EPB?=.'*XSG' M7'?UK<_X2FVN/[*AT^/[1=ZI;?:[>)V\M1%M#;G;!VCYE'`)R>G!KEH/!.OQ MZ%XPL6_LWS==NI;B$BYDQ&)#T;]WV]NOM4I\$:Y:IX=U33+JQAUS2;!-/E25 MG>WN(E&,$A0PYR>G?VH`[?39[RYLDDO[(6=R20T*S"4#!P"&`&0>O0=>E6ZP M+FU\423:0\.I6$2).7U&,0$B2/'"QDY(^IQR<]!M._0`5GZ[IS:MH=Y8JP5Y MHRJD]`>HS[9%:%%)JZL5"3A)26Z/(M)\5ZIX/LY-'N=+S(KDQ^82I4G\/F&? M3\ZZ+X=Z)>VOVS5;^-HI+K`1&&"1G)8CMDXQ7=T5E&E9IMWL>C7S%5(2C"FH MN7Q.^_\`D%%%%;'F!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`R6)9H7 MB?=M<%3M8J EX-21.1 35 v036625_ex21-1.htm
Exhibit 21.1
 
Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2005

The following table sets forth the names of the registrant's direct and indirect subsidiaries and the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation of each such entity. In each case, the names of the listed subsidiaries are the same as the names under which such subsidiaries do business.
 
Name
 
Incorporation
     
Union Center National Bank
 
National bank organized under the laws of the United States
     
Center Bancorp Statutory Trust I
 
Connecticut
     
Center Bancorp Statutory Trust II
 
Delaware
     
UCNB NJ Investment Corp.
 
New Jersey
     
UCNB Investment Corporation
 
Delaware
     
UCNB Capital Corp.
 
New Jersey
     
Center Financial Group, LLC
 
New Jersey
     
Center Advertising Corporation
 
New Jersey

EX-23.1 36 v036625_ex23-1.htm Unassociated Document
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Center Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 33-72176, No. 333-37436, No. 333-37434 and 333-116174 on Form S-8 and Registration Statements No. 33-72178, No. 333-100884 and No. 333-119932 on Form S-3 of Center Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated March 8, 2006, relating to the consolidated statements of condition of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports are incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Center Bancorp, Inc.

Our report dated March 8, 2006, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, expresses our opinion that Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states:
 
The Corporation has identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 related to accounting for income taxes. Specifically, the Corporation did not employ an adequate number of skilled personnel in its tax department to prepare the reconciliation of internal tax schedules to the general ledger and supporting documentation in a timely manner, and there was inadequate and ineffective analysis and management review of the relevant documentation supporting the deferred tax accounts related to the accounting for an acquisition of a business. As a result, material misstatements were identified in the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities and income tax expense accounts. Further, there was more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the Corporation’s interim or annual financial statements would not be prevented or detected.

KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 15, 2006
 

 
EX-24.1 37 v036625_ex24-1.htm
Exhibit 24.1
 
POWER OF ATTORNEY


WHEREAS, the undersigned officers and directors of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) desire to authorize John J. Davis and Anthony C. Weagley to act as their attorneys-in-fact and agents, for the purpose of executing and filing the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, including all amendments and supplements thereto,

NOW, THEREFORE,

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints John J. Davis and Anthony C. Weagley, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to sign the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, including any and all amendments to such report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the SEC, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this power of attorney in the following capacities as of the 5th day of March, 2005.
 
Signature  
 
Title
 
 
 
/s/ Alexander A. Bol*
 
Chairman of the Board
Alexander A. Bol
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ John J. Davis*  
President; Chief Executive Officer; Director
John J. Davis   
 
 
     
/s/ Hugo Barth, III*
 
Director
Hugo Barth, III
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Brenda Curtis*
 
Director
Brenda Curtis
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Donald G. Kein*  
Director
Donald G. Kein
 
 
   
 
/s/ James J. Kennedy  
Director
James J. Kennedy  
 
 
     
/s/ John J. DeLaney, Jr.  
Director
John J. DeLaney Jr.
 
 
     
/s/ Kenneth W. Battiato    
Kenneth W. Battiato
 
Director
     
/s/ Stephen J. LaMont    
Stephen J. LaMont
 
Director
     
/s/ Paul Lomakin, Jr.*
 
Director
Paul Lomakin, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Eugene V. Malinowski*
 
Director
Eugene V. Malinowski
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Herbert Schiller*
 
Director
Herbert Schiller
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Norman F. Schroeder*
 
Director 
Norman F. Schroeder
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ William A. Thompson*
 
Director
William A. Thompson
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Anthony C. Weagley* 
 
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
Anthony C. Weagley
 
 
 
EX-31.1 38 v036625_ex31-1.htm
Exhibit 31.1
 
CERTIFICATION
 
I, John J. Davis, certify that:
 
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Center Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 
(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: March 15, 2005 By:   /s/ JOHN J. DAVIS
 
John J. Davis
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 

 
EX-31.2 39 v036625_ex31-2.htm
Exhibit 31.2
 
CERTIFICATION
 
I, Anthony C. Weagley, certify that:
 
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Center Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 
(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: March 15, 2005 By:   /s/ ANTHONY C. WEAGLEY
 
Anthony C. Weagley
Vice President & Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
 
EX-32.1 40 v036625_ex32-1.htm
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
In connection with the Annual Report of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John J. Davis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: March 15, 2005 By:   /s/ JOHN J. DAVIS
 
John J. Davis
President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
EX-32.2 41 v036625_ex32-2.htm
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Anthony C. Weagley, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: March 15, 2005 By:   /s/ ANTHONY C. WEAGLEY
 
Anthony C. Weagley
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
 
This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----