10-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

Commission file number 1-10312

SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Georgia	58-1134883
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1111 Bay Avenue
Suite 500, Columbus, Georgia	31901
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)	(706) 649-5220

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

     YES þ NO o

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

     YES o NO þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     YES þ NO o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ  Accelerated filer o  Non-accelerated filer   o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o 

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

     YES o NO þ

     As of June 30, 2007, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $7,776,207,000 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

     As of February 15, 2008, there were 330,049,185 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Incorporated Documents	Form 10-K Reference Locations
Portions of the 2008 Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 24, 2008 (“Proxy Statement”)	Part III
Financial Appendix for the year ended December 31, 2007 to the Proxy Statement (“Financial Appendix”)	Parts I, II, III and IV

Table of Contents

		Page
Part I
Safe Harbor Statement			1
Item 1.	Business		1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		8
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	None
Item 2.	Properties		14
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		14
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	None
Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities		15
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		16
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		16
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		16
Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	None
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		16
Item 9B.	Other Information	None
Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		17
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		18
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		18
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		18
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		19
Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		19
EX-10.18 AMENDED AND RESTATED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
EX-10.33 FORM OF REVISED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
EX-10.36 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL BASE SALARIES
EX-21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
EX-23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
EX-32 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CEO AND CFO
EX-99.1 FINANCIAL APPENDIX TO THE PROXY STATEMENT

Part I

Safe Harbor Statement

     We have included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and from time to time our management may make, statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead represent only our belief regarding future events, many of which by their nature are inherently uncertain and outside our control. These statements include statements other than historical information or statements of current condition and may relate to our future plans, objectives and results, among other things, and also include (without limitation) statements made in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report. It is possible that our actual results may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results indicated in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others, those discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report.

     Accordingly, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the dates they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as required by applicable law. You should, however, consult further disclosures we may make in future filings of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments thereto.

Item 1. Business

Business 

     We are a diversified financial services company with approximately $33 billion in assets and are a registered bank holding company. We provide integrated financial services including banking, financial management, insurance, mortgage and leasing services through bank subsidiaries and our other offices in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Florida and Tennessee. We are based in Columbus, Georgia and our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SNV.”

     As of December 31, 2007, we had 37 wholly owned bank subsidiaries located in five southeastern states. Our bank subsidiaries offer commercial banking services, including commercial, financial, agricultural and real estate loans, and retail banking services, including accepting customary types of demand and savings deposits; making individual, consumer, installment and mortgage loans; safe deposit services; leasing services; automated banking services; automated fund transfers; Internet based banking services; and bank credit card services, including MasterCard and Visa services.

1

     Our primary wholly owned nonbank subsidiaries are: (1) Synovus Securities, Inc., Columbus, Georgia, which specializes in professional portfolio management for fixed-income securities, investment banking, the execution of securities transactions as a broker/dealer and the provision of individual investment advice on equity and other securities; (2) Synovus Trust Company, N.A., Columbus, Georgia, which provides trust services; (3) Synovus Mortgage Corp., Birmingham, Alabama, which offers mortgage services; (4) Synovus Insurance Services, Columbus, Georgia, which offers insurance agency services; (5) Creative Financial Group, LTD., Atlanta, Georgia, which provides financial planning services; and (6) GLOBALT, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, which provides asset management services.

     Additional information about our businesses is included in the “Financial Review” Section which is set forth on pages F-45 through F-76 of the Financial Appendix which is incorporated into this document by reference.

Spin-Off

     On December 31, 2007, we completed the spin-off of our shares of Total System Services, Inc. (“TSYS”) stock to Synovus shareholders. The distribution of the approximately 80.6% of TSYS’ outstanding shares we owned was made to shareholders of record on December 18, 2007, the record date. Each Synovus shareholder received 0.483921 of a share of TSYS stock for each share of Synovus stock held as of the record date. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-13 and F-14 of the Financial Appendix which is incorporated in this document by reference for additional information about the spin-off.

Acquisitions

     We have pursued a strategy of acquiring banks and financial services companies which are used to augment our internal growth. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-14 and F-15 and “Acquisitions” under the “Financial Review” Section on page F-48 of the Financial Appendix which are incorporated in this document by reference.

Supervision, Regulation and Other Factors

     Bank holding companies, financial holding companies and banks are regulated extensively under federal and state law. In addition, our nonbank subsidiaries are also subject to regulation under federal and state law. The following discussion sets forth some of the elements of the regulatory framework applicable to us. The regulatory framework is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the Bank Insurance Fund and not for the protection of security holders and creditors. To the extent that the following information describes statutory and regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions.

     General. We are a registered bank holding company and a financial holding company subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance under the bank holding company laws of the State of Georgia. Our affiliate national bank associations are subject to regulation and examination primarily by the Office of the Comptroller

2

of the Currency, which we refer to as the OCC, and, secondarily, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which we refer to as the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve Board. Our state-chartered banks are subject to primary federal regulation and examination by the FDIC and, in addition, are regulated and examined by their respective state banking departments. Numerous other federal and state laws, as well as regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, the state banking regulators, the OCC and the FDIC govern almost all aspects of the operations of our bank subsidiaries. Various federal and state bodies regulate and supervise our nonbank subsidiaries including our brokerage, investment advisory, insurance agency and processing operations. These include, but are not limited to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, federal and state banking regulators and various state regulators of insurance and brokerage activities.

     As a financial holding company we are eligible to engage in, or acquire companies engaged in, the broader range of activities that are permitted by the Gramm-Leach Bliley Act of 1999. These activities include those that are determined to be “financial in nature,” including insurance underwriting, securities underwriting and dealing, and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial companies. If any of our banking subsidiaries ceases to be “well capitalized” or “well managed” under applicable regulatory standards, the Federal Reserve Board may, among other things, place limitations on our ability to conduct these broader financial activities or, if the deficiencies persist, require us to divest the banking subsidiary. In addition, if any of our banking subsidiaries receives a rating of less than satisfactory under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 we would be prohibited from engaging in any additional activities other than those permissible for bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies.

     Dividends. Under the laws of the State of Georgia, we, as a business corporation, may declare and pay dividends in cash or property unless the payment or declaration would be contrary to restrictions contained in our Articles of Incorporation, and unless, after payment of the dividend, we would not be able to pay our debts when they become due in the usual course of our business or our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities. We are also subject to regulatory capital restrictions that limit the amount of cash dividends that we may pay. Additionally, we are subject to contractual restrictions that limit the amount of cash dividends we may pay.

     The primary sources of funds for our payment of dividends to our shareholders are dividends and fees to us from our bank and non-bank affiliates. Various federal and state statutory provisions and regulations limit the amount of dividends that our subsidiary banks may pay. Under the regulations of the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance, a Georgia bank must have approval of the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance to pay cash dividends if, at the time of such payment:

• the ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets is less than 6%;

• the aggregate amount of dividends to be declared or anticipated to be declared during the current calendar year exceeds 50% of its net after-tax profits for the previous calendar year; or

• its total classified assets in its most recent regulatory examination exceeded 80% of its Tier 1 capital plus its allowance for loan losses, as reflected in the examination.

3

     In general, the approval of the Alabama Banking Department, Florida Department of Financial Services and Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions is required if the total of all dividends declared by an Alabama, Florida or Tennessee bank, as the case may be, in any year would exceed the total of its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, the approval of the OCC is required for a national bank to pay dividends in excess of the bank’s retained net income for the current year plus retained net income for the preceding two years. Approval of the Federal Reserve Board is required for payment of any dividend by a state chartered bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System and sometimes referred to as a state member bank, if the total of all dividends declared by the bank in any calendar year would exceed the total of its net profits, as defined by regulatory agencies, for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years. In addition, a state member bank may not pay a dividend in an amount greater than its net profits then on hand.

     Federal and state banking regulations applicable to us and our bank subsidiaries require minimum levels of capital which limit the amounts available for payment of dividends. See “Parent Company” under the “Financial Review” Section on page F-74 and Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-26 and F-27 of the Financial Appendix which are incorporated in this document by reference.

     Monetary Policy and Economic Controls. The earnings of our bank subsidiaries, and therefore our earnings, are affected by the policies of regulatory authorities, including the Federal Reserve Board. An important function of the Federal Reserve Board is to promote orderly economic growth by influencing interest rates and the supply of money and credit. Among the methods that have been used to achieve this objective are open market operations in United States government securities, changes in the discount rate for member bank borrowings and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These methods are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, interest rates on loans and securities, and rates paid for deposits.

     The effects of the various Federal Reserve Board policies on our future business and earnings cannot be predicted. We cannot predict the nature or extent of any effects that possible future governmental controls or legislation might have on our business and earnings.

     Capital Requirements. We are required to comply with the capital adequacy standards established by the Federal Reserve Board and our bank subsidiaries must comply with similar capital adequacy standards established by the OCC, FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board, as applicable. As a financial holding company, we and each of our bank subsidiaries are required to maintain capital levels required for a well capitalized institution, as defined in “Prompt Corrective Action” below. There are two basic measures of capital adequacy for bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries that have been promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and the OCC: a risk-based measure and a leverage measure. All applicable capital standards must be satisfied for a bank holding company or a bank to be considered in compliance. See “Capital Resources” and “Dividends” under the “Financial Review” Section on pages F-70 through F-72 and Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-26 and F-27 of the Financial Appendix which are incorporated in this document by reference.

4

     Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank to a variety of enforcement remedies, including issuance of a capital directive, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, a prohibition on the taking of brokered deposits, and certain other restrictions on its business. As described below, substantial additional restrictions can be imposed upon FDIC insured depository institutions that fail to meet applicable capital requirements. See “Prompt Corrective Action” below.

     Commitments to Subsidiary Banks. Under the Federal Reserve Board’s policy, we are expected to act as a source of financial strength to our subsidiary banks and to commit resources to support our subsidiary banks in circumstances when we might not do so absent such policy. In addition, any capital loans by us to any of our subsidiary banks would also be subordinate in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of such bank.

     In the event of our bankruptcy, any commitment by us to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a banking subsidiary will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that any financial institution whose deposits are insured by the FDIC generally will be liable for any loss incurred by the FDIC in connection with the default of, or any assistance provided by the FDIC to, a commonly controlled financial institution. All of our bank subsidiaries are FDIC-insured depository institutions.

     Prompt Corrective Action. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 establishes a system of prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions. Under this system the federal banking regulators are required to rate supervised institutions on the basis of five capital categories as described below. The federal banking regulators are also required to take mandatory supervisory actions, and are authorized to take other discretionary actions, with respect to institutions in the three undercapitalized categories, the severity of which will depend upon the capital category in which the institution is placed. Generally, subject to a narrow exception, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act requires the banking regulator to appoint a receiver or conservator for an institution that is critically undercapitalized. The federal banking agencies have specified by regulation the relevant capital level for each category.

     Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, the OCC and the Office of Thrift Supervision have adopted regulations setting forth a five-tier scheme for measuring the capital adequacy of the financial institutions they supervise. Under the regulations, an institution would be placed in one of the following capital categories:

• Well Capitalized — an institution that has a Total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5%;

• Adequately Capitalized — an institution that has a Total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 4% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 4%;

• Undercapitalized — an institution that has a Total risk-based capital ratio of under 8%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of under 4% or a Tier 1 leverage ratio of under 4%;

5

• Significantly Undercapitalized — an institution that has a Total risk-based capital ratio of under 6%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of under 3% or a Tier 1 leverage ratio of under 3%; and

• Critically Undercapitalized — an institution whose tangible equity is not greater than 2% of total tangible assets.

     The regulations permit the appropriate federal banking regulator to downgrade an institution to the next lower category if the regulator determines (1) after notice and opportunity for hearing or response, that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or (2) that the institution has received and not corrected a less-than-satisfactory rating for any of the categories of asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity in its most recent examination. Supervisory actions by the appropriate federal banking regulator depend upon an institution’s classification within the five categories. Our management believes that we and our bank subsidiaries have the requisite capital levels to qualify as well capitalized institutions under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act regulations. See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-26 and F-27 of the Financial Appendix which is incorporated in this document by reference.

     The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution, including payment of a dividend, or paying any management fee to its holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. Undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to restrictions on borrowing from the Federal Reserve System. In addition, undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans. A depository institution’s holding company must guarantee the capital plan, up to an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the depository institution’s assets at the time it becomes undercapitalized or the amount of the capital deficiency when the institution fails to comply with the plan. Federal banking agencies may not accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the depository institution’s capital. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized.

     Significantly undercapitalized depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks. Critically undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator.

     Depositor Preference Statute. Federal law provides that deposits and certain claims for administrative expenses and employee compensation against an insured depository institution are afforded a priority over other general unsecured claims against such institution, including federal funds and letters of credit, in the liquidation or other resolution of the institution by any receiver.

     USA Patriot Act. The USA Patriot Act of 2001 substantially broadens anti-money laundering legislation and the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States, imposes new compliance and due diligence obligations, creates new crimes and penalties, compels the production of documents located both inside and outside the United States, including those of foreign institutions that have a correspondent relationship in the United States, and clarifies the

6

safe harbor from civil liability to customers. The U.S. Treasury Department has issued a number of regulations implementing the USA Patriot Act that apply certain of its requirements to financial institutions such as our banking and broker-dealer subsidiaries. The regulations impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing.

     Privacy. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, federal banking regulators adopted rules limiting the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose nonpublic information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. The rules require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to nonaffiliated third parties. The privacy provisions of this act affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial services companies and conveyed to outside vendors.

Competition

     The financial services business is highly competitive. Our banks and wholly owned nonbank subsidiaries compete actively with national and state banks, savings and loan associations and credit unions and other nonbank financial institutions, including securities brokers and dealers, investment advisory firms, personal loan companies, insurance companies, trust companies, finance companies, leasing companies, mortgage companies and certain governmental agencies, all of which actively engage in marketing various types of loans, deposit accounts and other financial services. These competitors have been successful in developing products that are in direct competition with or are alternatives to the banking services offered by traditional banking institutions. Our ability to deliver strong financial performance will depend in part on our ability to expand the scope of and effectively deliver products and services, allowing us to meet the changing needs of our customers.

     As of December 31, 2007, we were the second largest bank holding company headquartered in Georgia, based on assets. Customers for financial services are generally influenced by convenience, quality of service, personal contacts, price of services and availability of products. Although our market share varies in different markets, we believe that our affiliates effectively compete with other banks and thrifts in their relevant market areas.

Employees

     On December 31, 2007, we had 6,807 full time employees.

7

Selected Statistical Information

     The “Financial Review” Section which is set forth on pages F-45 through F-76 and the “Summary of Quarterly Financial Data” Section which is set forth on page F-77 of the Financial Appendix, which includes the information encompassed within “Selected Statistical Information,” are incorporated in this document by reference.

Available Information

     Our website address is www.synovus.com. You may obtain free electronic copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports in the Investor Relations Section of our website under the heading “Financial Reports” and then under “SEC Filings.” These reports are available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the SEC.

     We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our directors, officers and employees and have also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of our board committees are available in the Corporate Governance Section of our website at www.synovus.com/governance. Copies of these documents are also available in print upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, Synovus Financial Corp., 1111 Bay Avenue, Suite 500, Columbus, Georgia 31901.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     This section highlights specific risks that could affect our business and us. Although this section attempts to highlight key factors, please be aware that other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time and we cannot predict such risks or estimate the extent to which they may affect our financial performance. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere or incorporated by reference in this report, among the other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following:

We face intense competition from other financial service providers.

     We operate in a highly competitive environment in the products and services we offer and the markets in which we serve. The competition among financial services providers to attract and retain customers is intense. Customer loyalty can be easily influenced by a competitor’s new products, especially offerings that could provide cost savings to the customer. Some of our competitors may be better able to provide a wider range of products and services over a greater geographic area.

     Moreover, this highly competitive industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms and insurance companies now can merge by creating a “financial holding company,” which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and underwriting) and merchant banking. Also, a number of foreign banks have acquired financial services companies in the U.S., further increasing competition in the U.S.

8

market. In addition, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for nonbanks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Many of our competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and some have lower cost structures. We expect the consolidation of the banking and financial services industry to result in larger, better-capitalized companies offering a wide array of financial services and products.

The strength of the U.S. economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we operate may be different than expected, and we may not be able to successfully manage any impact from slowing economic conditions or a weak real estate market.

     Our business and earnings are affected by general business and economic conditions in the U.S. and in particular, the states where we have significant operations, including Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Florida and Tennessee. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, the strength of the U.S. economy and the local economies in which we operate and consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits. For example, certain markets in which we operate have been particularly adversely affected by declines in real estate value, declines in home sale volumes and declines in new home building. These factors could result in higher delinquencies and greater charge-offs in future periods, which would materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Deteriorating credit quality, particularly in residential construction and development loans, has adversely impacted us and may continue to adversely impact us.

     We have experienced a downturn in credit performance, particularly in the third and fourth quarters of 2007, and we expect credit conditions and the performance of our loan portfolio to continue to deteriorate in the near term. This deterioration has resulted in an increase in our provision expense for losses on loans during 2007, which increases were driven primarily by residential construction and development loans. Additional increases in provision expense may be necessary in the future. Deterioration in the quality of our loan portfolio can have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.

Recently declining values of residential real estate may increase our credit losses, which would negatively affect our financial results.

     We offer a variety of secured loans, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity, consumer and other loans. Many of our loans are secured by real estate (both residential and commercial) in our market area. A major change in the real estate market, such as deterioration in the value of this collateral, or in the local or national economy, could adversely affect our customer’s ability to pay these loans, which in turn could impact us. Risk of loan defaults and foreclosures are unavoidable in the banking industry, and we try to limit our exposure to this risk by monitoring our extensions of credit carefully. We cannot fully eliminate credit risk, and as a result credit losses may occur in the future.

The trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws of the federal government and its agencies, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board, significantly affect our earnings.

9

     The Federal Reserve Board regulates the supply of money and credit in the U.S. Its policies determine in large part our cost of funds for lending and investing and the return we earn on those loans and investments, both of which affect our net interest margin. They can also materially affect the value of financial instruments we hold, such as debt securities. Its policies can affect our borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans. For example, a tightening of the money supply by the Federal Reserve Board could reduce the demand for a borrower’s products and services. This could adversely affect the borrower’s earnings and ability to repay its loans, which could materially adversely affect us. In addition, higher interest rates could also increase our cost to borrow funds and increase the rate we pay on deposits. Changes in Federal Reserve Board policies and laws are beyond our control and hard to predict.

Maintaining or increasing market share depends on the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services and perceived overall value of these products and services by users.

     Our success depends, in part, on our ability to adapt our products and services to evolving industry standards. There is increasing pressure to provide products and services at lower prices. This can reduce our net interest margin and revenues from our fee-based products and services. In addition, our success depends, in part, on our ability to generate significant levels of new business in our existing markets and in identifying and penetrating new markets. Further, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet services, could require us to make substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services. We may not be successful in introducing new products and services, achieving market acceptance of products and services or developing and maintaining loyal customers and/or breaking into targeted markets.

We must respond to rapid technological changes and these changes may be more difficult or expensive than anticipated.

     If competitors introduce new products and services embodying new technologies, or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing product and service offerings, technology and systems may become obsolete. Further, if we fail to adopt or develop new technologies or to adapt our products and services to emerging industry standards, we may lose current and future customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The financial services industry is changing rapidly and in order to remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our products, services and technologies. These changes may be more difficult or expensive than we anticipate.

We have pursued a strategy of acquiring banks and financial services companies and these acquisitions may be more difficult to integrate than anticipated.

     We regularly explore opportunities to acquire banks and financial services companies and expect to grow, in part, through such acquisitions. Difficulty in integrating an acquired company may cause us not to realize expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits of the acquisition. The integration could result in higher than expected deposit attrition, loss of key employees, disruption of our business or the

10

business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. These factors could contribute to us not achieving the anticipated benefits of the acquisition within the desired time frames, if at all.

Fluctuations in our expenses and other costs may hurt our financial results.

     Our expenses and other costs, such as operating and marketing expenses, directly affect our earnings results. In light of the extremely competitive environment in which we operate, and because the size and scale of many of our competitors provides them with increased operational efficiencies, it is important that we are able to successfully manage such expenses. As our business develops, changes or expands, additional expenses can arise. Other factors that can affect the amount of our expenses include legal and administrative cases and proceedings, which can be expensive to pursue or defend. In addition, changes in accounting policies can significantly affect how we calculate expenses and earnings.

We are heavily regulated by federal and state agencies, and changes in laws and regulations may affect our financial outlook.

     Synovus, our subsidiary banks, and many of our nonbank subsidiaries, are heavily regulated at the federal and state levels. This regulation is designed primarily to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including interpretation and implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways, including limiting the types of financial services and products we may offer and/or increasing the ability of nonbanks to offer competing financial services and products. Also, if we do not comply with laws, regulations or policies, we could receive regulatory sanctions, including monetary penalties that may have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations, and damage to our reputation. For more information, refer to “Supervision, Regulation and Other Factors” on page 2.

Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or other authoritative bodies, could materially impact our financial statements.

     Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, the regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and other authoritative bodies change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations.

11

The costs and effects of litigation, investigations or similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto, could materially affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

     We may be involved from time to time in a variety of litigation, investigations or similar matters arising out of our business. Our insurance may not cover all claims that may be asserted against it and indemnification rights to which we are entitled may not be honored, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any litigation or investigation significantly exceed our insurance coverage, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may not be able to obtain appropriate types or levels of insurance in the future, nor may we be able to obtain adequate replacement policies with acceptable terms, if at all.

We may experience increased delinquencies and credit losses.

     Like other lenders, we face the risk that our customers will not repay their loans. A customer’s failure to repay is generally preceded by missed payments. In some instances, a customer may declare bankruptcy prior to missing payments, although this is not generally the case. Customers who declare bankruptcy frequently do not repay their loans. Where we have collateral, we attempt to seize it when customers default on their loans. The value of the collateral may not equal the amount of the unpaid loan, and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the remaining balance from our customers. Rising delinquencies and rising rates of bankruptcy are often precursors of future charge-offs and may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses. Higher charge-off rates and an increase in our allowance for loan losses may hurt our overall financial performance if we are unable to raise revenue to compensate for these losses and may increase our cost of funds.

Our financial condition and outlook may be adversely affected by damage to our reputation.

     Our financial condition and outlook is highly dependent upon perceptions of our business practices and reputation. Our ability to attract and retain customers and employees could be adversely affected to the extent our reputation is damaged. Negative public opinion could result from our actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance, regulatory compliance, mergers and acquisitions, disclosure, sharing or inadequate protection of customer information and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to that conduct. Damage to our reputation could give rise to legal risks, which, in turn, could increase the size and number of litigation claims and damages asserted or subject us to enforcement actions, fines and penalties and cause us to incur related costs and expenses.

Our access to funds from our subsidiaries may become limited, thereby restricting our ability to make payments on our obligations or dividend payments.

     Synovus is a separate and distinct legal entity from our banking and nonbanking subsidiaries. We therefore depend on dividends, distributions and other payments from our banking and nonbanking subsidiaries to fund dividend payments on our common stock and to fund

12

all payments on our other obligations, including debt obligations. Our banking subsidiaries and certain other of our subsidiaries are subject to laws that authorize regulatory bodies to block or reduce the flow of funds from those subsidiaries to us. Regulatory action of that kind could impede access to funds we need to make payments on our obligations or dividend payments.

Changes in the cost and availability of funding due to changes in the deposit market and credit market, or the way in which we are perceived in such markets, may adversely affect financial results.

     In general, the amount, type and cost of our funding, including from other financial institutions, the capital markets and deposits, directly impacts our costs in operating our business and growing our assets and therefore, can positively or negatively affect our financial results. A number of factors could make funding more difficult, more expensive or unavailable on any terms, including, but not limited to, a reduction in our debt ratings, financial results and losses, changes within our organization, specific events that adversely impact our reputation, disruptions in the capital markets, specific events that adversely impact the financial services industry, counterparty availability, changes affecting our assets, the corporate and regulatory structure, interest rate fluctuations, general economic conditions and the legal, regulatory, accounting and tax environments governing our funding transactions. Also, we compete for funding with other banks and similar companies, many of which are substantially larger, and have more capital and other resources than we do. In addition, as some of these competitors consolidate with other financial institutions, these advantages may increase. Competition from these institutions may increase the cost of funds.

We rely on our systems and employees and certain failures could materially adversely affect our operations.

     We are exposed to many types of operational risk, including the risk of fraud by employees and outsiders, clerical and record-keeping errors, and computer/telecommunications systems malfunctions. Our businesses are dependent on our ability to process a large number of increasingly complex transactions. If any of our financial, accounting, or other data processing systems fail or have other significant shortcomings, we could be materially adversely affected. We are similarly dependent on our employees. We could be materially adversely affected if one of our employees causes a significant operational break-down or failure, either as a result of human error or where an individual purposefully sabotages or fraudulently manipulates our operations or systems. Third parties with which we do business could also be sources of operational risk to us, including relating to break-downs or failures of such parties’ own systems or employees. Any of these occurrences could result in a diminished ability of us to operate one or more of our businesses, potential liability to clients, reputational damage and regulatory intervention, which could materially adversely affect us.

     We may also be subject to disruptions of our operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, which may include, for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages or natural disasters. Such disruptions may give rise to losses in service to customers and loss or liability to us. In addition, there is a risk that our business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate. Any such failure could affect our operations and could materially adversely affect our results of operations by requiring us

13

to expend significant resources to correct the defect, as well as by exposing us to litigation or losses not covered by insurance.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

     None.

Item 2. Properties

     We and our subsidiaries own, in some cases subject to mortgages or other security interests, or lease all of the real property and/or buildings on which we are located. All of such buildings are in a good state of repair and are appropriately designed for the purposes for which they are used.

     We and our subsidiaries own 323 facilities encompassing approximately 2,579,299 square feet and lease from third parties 123 facilities encompassing approximately 868,815 square feet. The owned and leased facilities are primarily comprised of office space from which we conduct our business. The following table provides additional information with respect to our leased facilities:

			Average
Square Footage	Number of Locations		Square Footage
Under 3,000		45		1,128
3,000 – 9,999		54		5,050
10,000 – 18,999		9		12,834
19,000 – 30,000		10		23,922
Over 30,000		5		38,122

     See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-23 through F-26 of the Financial Appendix which is incorporated in this document by reference.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

     See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-23 through F-26 of the Financial Appendix which is incorporated in this document by reference.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     None.

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

     Shares of our common stock are traded on the NYSE under the symbol “SNV.” See “Capital Resources” and “Dividends” under the “Financial Review” Section which are set forth on pages F-70 through F-72 and “Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” under the “Financial Review” Section which is set forth on page F-74 of the Financial Appendix which are incorporated in this document by reference.

14

Stock Performance Graph

     The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in cumulative shareholder return on Synovus stock with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the KBW Regional Bank Index for the last five fiscal years (assuming a $100 investment on December 31, 2002 and reinvestment of all dividends).

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among Synovus Financial Corp., The S&P 500 Index
And The KBW Regional Bank Index

	2002		2003		2004		2005		2006		2007
Synovus	$	100	$	153	$	156	$	151	$	177	$	142
S&P 500	$	100	$	129	$	143	$	150	$	173	$	183
KBW Regional Bank	$	100	$	140	$	158	$	158	$	170	$	130

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

     The “Selected Financial Data” Section which is set forth on page F-44 of the Financial Appendix is incorporated in this document by reference.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     The “Financial Review” Section which is set forth on pages F-45 through F-76 and the “Summary of Quarterly Financial Data” Section which is set forth on page F-77 of the Financial

15

Appendix which include the information encompassed by “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” are incorporated in this document by reference.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     See “Market Risk and Interest Rate Sensitivity” and “Derivative Instruments for Interest Rate Risk Management” under the “Financial Review” Section which are set forth on pages F-67 through F-69 and Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-23 through F-26 of the Financial Appendix which are incorporated in this document by reference.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     The “Summary of Quarterly Financial Data” Section which is set forth on page F-77 and the “Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (on consolidated financial statements), Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting)” Sections which are set forth on pages F-2 through F-43 of the Financial Appendix are incorporated in this document by reference.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

     Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report as required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based on this evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to us (including our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic SEC filings.

     Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,” which is set forth on page F-42 of the Financial Appendix, and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting),” which is set forth on page F-43 of the Financial Appendix, are incorporated in this document by reference.

     Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter covered by this Annual Report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

16

Item 9B. Other Information

     None.

Part III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

     Information included under the following captions in our Proxy Statement is incorporated in this document by reference:

• “PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON” – “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”;

• “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS”;

• “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE”; and

• “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS” – “Committees of the Board.”

     We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and chief accounting officer. You can find our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.synovus.com/governance. We will post any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waivers that are required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the NYSE in the Corporate Governance section of our website.

     Because our common stock is listed on the NYSE, our chief executive officer is required to make, and he has made, an annual certification to the NYSE stating that he was not aware of any violation by us of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. Our chief executive officer made his annual certification to that effect to the NYSE as of May 17, 2007. In addition, we have filed, as exhibits to this Annual Report, the certifications of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

     Information included under the following captions in our Proxy Statement is incorporated in this document by reference:

• “DIRECTOR COMPENSATION”;

• “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” – “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”; “Compensation Committee Report”; “Summary Compensation Table” and the compensation tables and related information which follow the Summary Compensation Table; and

17

• “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS” – “Committees of the Board” – “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.”

     The information included under the heading “Compensation Committee Report” in our Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference; however, this information shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Commission or subject to regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

     Information pertaining to equity compensation plans is contained in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-28 through F-32 of the Financial Appendix and is incorporated in this document by reference.

     Information included under the following captions in our Proxy Statement is incorporated in this document by reference:

• “STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS”; and

• “PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS.”

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

     Information included under the following captions in our Proxy Statement is incorporated in this document by reference:

• “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS”;

• “RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SYNOVUS, CB&T, TSYS AND CERTAIN OF SYNOVUS’ SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES” – “Spin-Off”; “Interlocking Directorates of Synovus, CB&T and TSYS”; and “Transactions and Agreements Between Synovus, CB&T, TSYS and Certain of Synovus’ Subsidiaries”; and

• “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS” – “Independence.”

18

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     Information included under the following captions in our Proxy Statement is incorporated in this document by reference:

• “AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT” – “KPMG LLP Fees and Services” (excluding the information under the main caption “AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT”); and “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval.”

Part IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 

(a) 1. Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements of Synovus and our subsidiaries are incorporated by reference from pages F-2 through F-43 of the Financial Appendix.

Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Income — Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income — Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (on consolidated financial statements)

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting)

2. Financial Statement Schedules

Financial Statement Schedules — None applicable because the required information has been incorporated in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Synovus and our subsidiaries which are incorporated in this document by reference.

19

3.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated to other documents previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Exhibits 10.8 through 10.37 pertain to executive compensation plans and arrangements. With the exception of those portions of the Financial Appendix and Proxy Statement that are expressly incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, such documents are not to be deemed filed as part of this Form 10-K.

Exhibit
Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Synovus, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Synovus’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on May 10, 2006.
3.2	Bylaws, as amended, of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Synovus’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the SEC on November 13, 2007.
10.1	Agreement and Plan of Distribution, dated as of October 25, 2007, by and among Synovus, Columbus Bank and Trust Company and Total System Services, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 25, 2007.
10.2	Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Distribution by and among Synovus, Columbus Bank and Trust Company and Total System Services, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2007.
10.3	Transition Services Agreement by and among Synovus and Total System Services, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2007.
10.4	Employee Matters Agreement by and among Synovus and Total System Services, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2007.
10.5	Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement by and among Synovus and Total System Services, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2007.

20

Exhibit
Number	Description
10.6	Master Confidential Disclosure Agreement by and among Synovus and Total System Services, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2007.
10.7	Tax Sharing Agreement by and among Synovus, Columbus Bank and Trust Company and Total System Services, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2007.
10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS AND ARRANGEMENTS
10.8	Director Stock Purchase Plan of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, as filed with the SEC on March 22, 2000.
10.9	Synovus Financial Corp. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the SEC on March 21, 2002.
10.10	Synovus Financial Corp. Deferred Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the SEC on March 21, 2002.
10.11	Synovus Financial Corp. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the SEC on March 21, 2002.
10.12	Wage Continuation Agreement of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992, as filed with the SEC on March 29, 1993.
10.13	Agreement in Connection with Personal Use of Company Aircraft, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the SEC on March 7, 2006.
10.14	Life Insurance Trusts, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992, as filed with the SEC on March 29, 1993.

21

Exhibit
Number	Description
10.15	1993 Split Dollar Insurance Agreement of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 1994.
10.16	1995 Split Dollar Insurance Agreement of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, as filed with the SEC on March 24, 1995.
10.17	Synovus Financial Corp. 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, as filed with the SEC on March 24, 1995.
10.18	Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.19	Synovus Financial Corp. Executive Cash Bonus Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on 8-K dated April 27, 2006.
10.20	Change of Control Agreements for executive officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 19, 2005, as filed with the SEC on January 20, 2005.
10.21	Employment Agreement of James H. Blanchard, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of Synovus’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, as filed with the SEC on November 15, 1999.
10.22	Synovus Financial Corp. 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, as filed with the SEC on March 22, 2000.
10.23	Form of Stock Option Agreement for the: (i) Synovus Financial Corp. 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan; (ii) Synovus Financial Corp. 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and (iii) Synovus Financial Corp. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Synovus’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the SEC on November 9, 2004.
10.24	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for the Synovus 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 19, 2005, as filed with the SEC on January 25, 2005.

22

Exhibit
Number	Description
10.25	Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement for the Synovus 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 19, 2005, as filed with the SEC on January 25, 2005.
10.26	Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement for the Synovus 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2005, as filed with the SEC on February 3, 2005.
10.27	Form of Stock Option Agreement for the Synovus Financial Corp. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan for grants made subsequent to January 18, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 18, 2006.
10.28	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for the Synovus Financial Corp. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan for grants made subsequent to January 18, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 18, 2006.
10.29	Synovus Financial Corp. 2007 Omnibus Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 25, 2007.
10.30	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for restricted stock awards under the Synovus Financial Corp. 2007 Omnibus Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 25, 2007.
10.31	Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement for performance-based restricted stock awards under the Synovus Financial Corp. 2007 Omnibus Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 25, 2007.
10.32	Form of Revised Stock Option Agreement for stock option awards under the Synovus Financial Corp. 2007 Omnibus Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 2008.
10.33	Form of Revised Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for restricted stock unit awards under the Synovus Financial Corp. 2007 Omnibus Plan.

23

Exhibit
Number	Description
10.34	Form of Retention Stock Option Agreement for retention stock option awards under the Synovus Financial Corp. 2007 Omnibus Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 2008.
10.35	Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 26, 2007.
10.36	Summary of Annual Base Salaries of Synovus’ Named Executive Officers.
10.37	Summary of Board of Directors Compensation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on March 1, 2007.
21.1	Subsidiaries of Synovus Financial Corp.
23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
24.1	Powers of Attorney contained on the signature pages of this 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1	Financial Appendix to the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Synovus to be held on April 24, 2008.
99.2	Annual Report on Form 11-K for the Synovus Financial Corp. Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the year ended December 31, 2007 (to be filed as an amendment hereto within 120 days of the end of the period covered by this report).
99.3	Annual Report on Form 11-K for the Synovus Financial Corp. Director Stock Purchase Plan for the year ended December 31, 2007 (to be filed as an amendment hereto within 120 days of the end of the period covered by this report).

24

     We agree to furnish the SEC, upon request, a copy of each instrument with respect to issues of long-term debt. The principal amount of any individual instrument, which has not been previously filed, does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of Synovus and our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

25

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Synovus Financial Corp. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP. (Registrant)
February 29, 2008	By:	/s/ Richard E. Anthony
		Richard E. Anthony,
		Principal Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Richard E. Anthony and Frederick L. Green, III and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s), with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report and to file the same, with all exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s) full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s), or their substitute(s), may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Richard E. Anthony	Date: February 29, 2008
Richard E. Anthony,
Principal Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
/s/ Frederick L. Green, III	Date: February 29, 2008
Frederick L. Green, III,
President and Director
/s/ Thomas J. Prescott	Date: February 29, 2008
Thomas J. Prescott,
Executive Vice President and
Principal Financial Officer

/s/ Liliana McDaniel	Date: February 29, 2008
Liliana McDaniel,
Chief Accounting Officer
/s/ Daniel P. Amos	Date: February 29, 2008
Daniel P. Amos,
Director
/s/ James H. Blanchard	Date: February 29, 2008
James H. Blanchard,
Director
/s/ Richard Y. Bradley	Date: February 29, 2008
Richard Y. Bradley,
Director
	Date:                      , 2008
Frank W. Brumley,
Director
/s/ Elizabeth W. Camp	Date: February 29, 2008
Elizabeth W. Camp,
Director
/s/ Gardiner W. Garrard, Jr.	Date: February 29, 2008
Gardiner W. Garrard, Jr.,
Director
/s/ T. Michael Goodrich	Date: February 29, 2008
T. Michael Goodrich,
Director
/s/ V. Nathaniel Hansford	Date: February 29, 2008
V. Nathaniel Hansford,
Director
/s/ Alfred W. Jones III	Date: February 29, 2008
Alfred W. Jones III,
Director

	Date:                     , 2008
Mason H. Lampton,
Director
/s/ Elizabeth C. Ogie	Date: February 29, 2008
Elizabeth C. Ogie,
Director
/s/ H. Lynn Page	Date: February 29, 2008
H. Lynn Page,
Director
/s/ Philip W. Tomlinson	Date: February 29, 2008
Philip W. Tomlinson,
Director
/s/ J. Neal Purcell	Date: February 29, 2008
J. Neal Purcell,
Director
/s/ Melvin T. Stith	Date: February 29, 2008
Melvin T. Stith,
Director
/s/ William B. Turner, Jr.	Date: February 29, 2008
William B. Turner, Jr.,
Director
/s/ James D. Yancey	Date: February 29, 2008
James D. Yancey,
Director

EX-10.18

Exhibit 10.18

AMENDED AND RESTATED
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

PLAN DOCUMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

A.

Purpose of Plan. The Employer has adopted the Plan set forth herein to provide benefits in excess of those that may be accrued under the Employer’s qualified retirement plans as a result of the limitations of Code section 401(a)(17) and 415 as a means by which certain designated employees may elect to defer designated portions of their Compensation, or in the discretion of the Employer, receive additional amounts of deferred compensation in the form of Discretionary Credits.

B.

Status of Plan. To the extent the Plan provides benefits in excess of the limitations of Code section 415, the Plan is intended to be an “excess benefit plan” within the meaning of sections 3(36) and 4(6) of ERISA, and to the extent the Plan provides other benefits, the Plan is intended to be “a plan which is unfunded and is maintained by an employer primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees” within the meaning of sections 201(2), 301(a)(3), 401(a)(1), and 4021(b)(6) of ERISA, and shall be interpreted and administered to the extent possible in a manner consistent with that intent.

II. DEFINITIONS

Wherever used herein, the following terms have the meanings set forth below, unless a different meaning is clearly required by the context:
A.	“Account” means, for each Participant, the account established for his or her benefit under the Plan.
B.	“Cause” means:

1.	the Participant’s conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude;
2.	the Participant’s dishonesty with respect to the Employer or any affiliate; or
3.	the Participant’s willful failure to perform, or material negligence in the performance of, the Participant’s duties and responsibilities with respect to the Employer.

C.	“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time. Reference to any section or subsection of the Code includes reference to any comparable or succeeding provisions of any legislation that amends, supplements or replaces such section or subsection.
D.	“Compensation” means, with respect to a Participant, his or her base salary, including any bonuses, overtime, commissions and incentives.

E.	“Disability” means the inability of a Participant to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, and the permanence and degree of which shall be supported by medical evidence satisfactory to the Plan Administrator.
F.	“Discretionary Credit” means an amount credited to a Participant’s Account by the Employer in accordance with Section IV.B.
G.	“Effective Date” means January 1, 2002.
H.	“Elective Deferral” means the portion of Compensation which is deferred by a Participant under Section IV.A.
I.	“Eligible Employee” means each individual selected by the Plan Administrator for eligibility from among the group of highly compensated or managerial employees of the Employer.
J.	“Employer” means Synovus Financial Corp. and any of its affiliates.
K.	“ERISA” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time. Reference to any section or subsection of ERISA includes reference to any comparable or succeeding provisions of any legislation that amends, supplements or replaces such section or subsection.
L.	“Participant” means any individual who participates in the Plan in accordance with Article III.
M.	“Plan” means the Synovus Financial Corp. Deferred Compensation Plan and as set forth herein and all subsequent amendments hereto.
N.	“Plan Administrator” means the Employer, or the person, persons or entity otherwise designated by the Employer to administer the Plan.
O.	“Plan Year” means the calendar year, except that the initial plan year may be a period of less than 12 months’ duration beginning on the Effective Date.
P.	“Valuation Date” means the last business day of each quarter.
Q.	“Vested” means the nonforfeitable right to a portion of the Participant’s Account attributable to Discretionary Credits, if any, determined in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth in Section V.D.

2

III. PARTICIPATION

A.	Commencement of Participation. Any individual who is an Eligible Employee on or after the Effective Date and who has elected to defer part of his or her Compensation in accordance with Section IV.A or who has been selected to receive Discretionary Credits under Section IV.B shall become a Participant on the date such Elective Deferral election or Discretionary Credit is made, as the case may be.
B.	Continued Participation. Subject to Section III.C, an individual who has become a Participant in the Plan shall continue to be a Participant so long as any amount remains credited to his or her Account.
C.	Termination of Participation. The Plan Administrator may terminate an employee’s participation in the Plan prospectively or retroactively for any reason, including but not limited to the Plan Administrator’s determination that such termination is necessary in order to maintain the Plan as a “plan which is unfunded and is maintained by an employer primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees” within the meaning of sections 201(2), 301(a)(3), 401(a)(1), and 4021(b)(6) of ERISA. Amounts credited to a Participant’s Account (regardless of the extent otherwise Vested) shall be paid out to such Participant in a single lump sum cash payment as soon as reasonably practical following termination of participation hereunder.

IV. DEFERRALS AND CREDITS

A. Elective Deferrals.

1.

In general. An individual who is an Eligible Employee may elect to defer a designated portion of Compensation to be earned during a Plan Year, by filing a written election with the Plan Administrator prior to the first day of the Plan Year in which such Compensation is to be earned. An individual who first becomes an Eligible Employee on or after the first day of any Plan Year may elect to defer a portion of Compensation to be earned during the remainder of the Plan Year and after the written election is filed with the Plan Administrator. The deferred amounts shall be credited to the Participant’s Account as of the date such Compensation would otherwise have been paid to the Participant.

2.

Nature of Election. Each election under this Section IV for a Plan Year (or the balance of a Plan Year) shall be made on a form approved or prescribed by the Plan Administrator and shall apply only to Compensation earned for the calendar year after the date the election form is completed and filed with the Plan Administrator. The election form shall apply to bonuses and shall specify the whole percentage or flat dollar

3

amount that is to be deferred. A Participant may revoke his or her deferral election as of the first day of any Plan Year which follows such revocation by giving written notice to the Plan Administrator before that day (or any such earlier date as the Plan Administrator may prescribe). Any deferral election made under this Section IV.A shall continue to be effective until revoked or changed pursuant to this paragraph.

B. Excess Benefit Credits. The Employer shall credit the Account of each Participant with the excess of any amount that would have been allocated to the Participant’s account under the Synovus Money Purchase Pension Plan (the “Money Purchase Plan”), the Synovus Profit Sharing Plan (the “Profit Sharing Plan”) or the Synovus 401(k) Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) but for the limitation of Code sections 401(a)(17) and 415 over the amount actually credited to such account; such credits to be made as of the date or dates that the amounts would have been allocated to the Participant’s account under the Money Purchase Plan, the Profit Sharing Plan or the 401(k) Plan.

V. ACCOUNTS

A.	Accounts. The Plan Administrator shall establish an Account for each Participant reflecting Elective Deferrals or Discretionary Credits made for the Participant’s benefit together with any adjustments hereunder. Subject to Sections V.E and IX.A, the Employer shall deposit the amount of deferrals and credits for a period as soon as practicable after the date as of which such amounts are credited to the Accounts. As of each Valuation Date, the Plan Administrator shall provide the Participant with a statement of his or her Account reflecting the income, gains and losses (realized and unrealized), amounts of deferrals and credits, and distributions of such Account since the prior Valuation Date.
B.	Investments. Each Participant’s Account shall be invested in shares of any open-end registered investment company for which Fidelity Investments or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates (collectively “Fidelity”) serves as investment advisor or for which Fidelity is the principal underwriter, or any other investment option selected by the Plan Administrator. If any Participant or beneficiary makes an investment selection, the Employer (or in the event of the establishment of a trust hereunder, the trustee of such trust as directed by the Employer) may follow such investment selection but shall not be legally bound to do so.
C.	Payments. Each Participant’s Account shall be reduced by the amount of any payment made to or on behalf of the Participant under Article VI as of the date such payment is made.
D.	Vesting. A Participant will at all times be 100% Vested in the portion of his or her Account attributable to Elective Deferrals. A Participant will be vested in the portion of his or her Account attributable to Excess Benefit Credits from the Profit Sharing Plan or the Money Purchase Pension Plan according to the

4

following schedule, based on his or her years of service with the Employer. A Participant’s years of service for this purpose will be determined by the Administrator pursuant to uniform rules based on the time elapsed since the Participant’s commencement of employment with the Employer or its affiliates.

Years of Service	% Vested
less than 1		0
2		25
3		50
4		75
5 or more		100

E.	Forfeiture of non-Vested Amounts. To the extent that any amounts credited to a Participant’s Account are not Vested at the time the Account becomes distributable under the Plan, such non-Vested amounts shall be forfeited and may be used by the Employer as future Discretionary Credits for other Participants.
F.	Special Elections. From time to time, Employer may offer Participants the opportunity to exchange all or part of their Accounts to other non-qualified benefits. Any such election shall be evidenced by a separate written agreement between Employer and the Participant that sets forth the details of the election. The Account of each Participant who makes such an election will be adjusted pursuant to the terms of the separate written agreement.
G.	Plan Mergers. From time to time, other non-qualified deferred compensation plans may be merged into the Plan. All Accounts resulting from such merged plans will be 100% vested as of the date of merger. A list of merged plans, together with any special terms and conditions adopted in connection with the merger, is attached to the Plan as Exhibit “A.”

VI. PAYMENTS

A.

Severe Financial Emergency. A Participant who believes he or she is suffering a severe financial emergency may apply to the Plan Administrator for a distribution under the Plan in order to alleviate such emergency. The Plan Administrator, in its sole discretion (but after taking into account, among other factors, the nature and foreseeability of the alleged emergency, the Participant’s other resources, and the effect of making a distribution on the intended tax status of the deferrals made under the Plan), may direct the Employer to pay to the Participant an amount which it determines is necessary or appropriate, not to exceed the Vested portion of the Participant’s Account balance, and the Employer shall pay such amount to the Participant in a single lump sum cash payment.

B.

Timing of Distribution. If a Participant elects to have Elective Deferrals made on his or her behalf for any Plan Year (or, if Discretionary Credits will be made on his or her behalf for a Plan Year regardless of whether Elective Deferrals are

5

being made for the Plan Year), the Participant may elect the timing of the payment of all vested amounts credited to his or her Account from one of the following two options:

1.	the January 1 following a specified date, which must be at least two years after the Plan Year for which the Elective Deferrals or Discretionary Credits are made, or
2.	as soon as reasonably practical following termination of employment for any reason including retirement or death.

The foregoing election shall be made on a form approved or prescribed by the Plan Administrator. Each such election may be made or changed in the calendar year prior to the time when the corresponding amounts in the Participant’s Account are payable or otherwise made available to the Participant.

If no new election is made hereunder with respect to any deferrals or credits, the existing election as to time of payment of such amounts shall remain effective for all amounts deferred and credited thereafter until a new election is made hereunder with respect to future deferrals. If no election is in effect with respect to a portion of a Participant’s Account, payment will be made as soon as reasonably practical following termination of employment for any reason including retirement or death.

C.

Beneficiary Designation. A Participant shall designate a beneficiary who shall be entitled to receive any Vested amounts remaining in the Participant’s Account after his or death. Such designation shall be made in writing on a form approved or prescribed by the Plan Administrator, and may be changed by the Participant at any time. If there is no such designation or no designated beneficiary survives the Participant, payment shall be made to the Participant’s estate.

D.

Form of Payment.

1. If a Participant elects to have Elective Deferrals made on his or her behalf for any Plan Year (or, if Discretionary Credits will be made on his or her behalf for a Plan Year regardless of whether Elective Deferrals are being made for the Plan Year), the Participant may also elect the form of payment of all Vested amounts credited to his or her Account under one of the following options:

a)	a single lump sum payment; or
b)	annual installments over a period elected by the Participant up to 10 years, the amount of each installment to equal the balance of his or her Account immediately prior to the installment divided by the number of installments remaining to be paid.

6

The foregoing election shall be made on a form approved or prescribed by the Plan Administrator. Each such election may be made or changed in the calendar year prior to the time when the corresponding amounts in the Participant’s Account are payable or otherwise made available to the Participant.

If no new election is made hereunder with respect to any deferrals or credits, the existing election as to form of payment of such amounts shall remain effective for all amounts deferred and credited thereafter until a new election is made hereunder with respect to future deferrals. If no election is in effect with respect to a portion of a Participant’s Account, payment will be made in the form of annual installments for a period of 10 years.

Payments under this Section shall be made in cash. Any such election shall be made in such form and with such prior notice as the Administrator may require. Regardless of the Participant’s election, if the Participant’s vested Account balance is less than or equal to $100,000, the distribution will be made in a single lump sum payment.

VII. ADMINISTRATION

A.

Plan Administrator; Interpretation. The Plan Administrator shall oversee the administration of the Plan. The Plan Administrator shall have complete discretionary control and authority to administer all aspects of the Plan, including without limitation the power to appoint agents and counsel, and to determine the rights and benefits and all claims, demands and actions arising out of the provisions of the Plan of any Participant, beneficiary, deceased Participant, or other person having or claiming to have any interest under the Plan, in a manner consistent with Section VII.B. The Plan Administrator shall have the exclusive discretionary power to interpret the Plan and to decide all matters under the Plan. Such interpretation and decision shall be final, conclusive and binding on all Participants and any person claiming under or through any Participant, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence that the Plan Administrator acted arbitrarily and capriciously. Any individual serving as Plan Administrator, or on a committee acting as Plan Administrator, who is a Participant will not vote or act on any matter relating solely to himself or herself. When making a determination or calculation, the Plan Administrator shall be entitled to rely on information furnished by a Participant, a beneficiary, or any other person or entity. The Plan Administrator shall be deemed to be the plan administrator with responsibility for complying with any reporting and disclosure requirements of ERISA.

B.

Claims Procedure.

7

1.

In General. If any person believes he or she is being denied any rights or benefits under the Plan, such person may file a claim in writing with the Plan Administrator. If any such claim is wholly or partially denied, the Plan Administrator will notify such person of its decision in writing. Such notification will contain (i) specific reasons for the denial, (ii) specific reference to pertinent plan provisions, (iii) a description of any additional material or information necessary for such person to perfect such claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary and (iv) information as to the steps to be taken if the person wishes to submit a request for review. Such notification will be given within 90 days after the claim is received by the Plan Administrator (or within 180 days, if special circumstances require an extension of time for processing the claim, and if written notice of such extension and circumstances is given to such person within the initial 90 day period). If such notification is not given within such period, the claim will be considered denied as of the last day of such period and such person may request a review of his or her claim.

2.

Appeals. Within 60 days after the date on which a person receives a written notice of a denied claim (or, if applicable, within 60 days after the date on which such denial is considered to have occurred) such person (or his or her duly authorized representative) may (i) file a written request with the Plan Administrator for a review of his or her denied claim and of pertinent documents and (ii) submit written issues and comments to the Plan Administrator. The Plan Administrator will notify such person of its decision in writing. Such notification will be written in a manner calculated to be understood by such person and will contain specific reasons for the decision as well as specific references to pertinent plan provisions. The decision on review will be made within 60 days after the request for review is received by the Plan Administrator (or within 120 days, if special circumstances require an extension of time for processing the request, such as an election by the Plan Administrator to hold a hearing, and if written notice of such extension and circumstances is given to such person within the initial 60 day period). If the decision on review is not made within such period, the claim will be considered denied.

C. Indemnification of Plan Administrator. The Employer agrees to indemnify and to defend to the fullest extent permitted by law any director, officer or employee of the Employer or any affiliated company who serves as the Plan Administrator or as a member of a committee appointed to serve as Plan Administrator, or who assists the Plan Administrator in carrying out its duties as part of his or her employment (including any such individual who formerly served in any such capacity) against all liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and amounts paid in settlement of any claims approved by the Employer) occasioned by any act or omission to act in connection with the Plan, if such act or omission is in good faith.

8

VIII. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

A.	Amendments. The Employer shall have the right to amend the Plan from time to time, subject to Section VIII.C, by an instrument in writing which has been executed on the Employer’s behalf by an officer thereof or by vote of its Board of Directors.
B.	Termination of Plan. This Plan is strictly a voluntary undertaking on the part of the Employer and shall not be deemed to constitute a contract between the Employer and any Eligible Employee (or any other employee) or a consideration for, or an inducement or condition of employment for, the performance of the services by any Eligible Employee (or other employee). The Employer reserves the right to terminate the Plan at any time, subject to Section VIII.C, by an instrument in writing which has been executed on said Employer’s behalf by an officer thereof or by vote of its Board of Directors.
C.	Existing Rights. No amendment or termination of the Plan shall adversely affect the rights of any Participant with respect to amounts credited to his or her Account that are attributable to Elective Deferrals or Discretionary Credits credited prior to the date of such amendment or termination. Any termination of the Plan will cause each Participant to be 100% Vested in his or her Account, notwithstanding Section V.D.
D.	Assignment. The rights and obligations of the Employer shall enure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon its successors and assigns.

IX. MISCELLANEOUS

A.

No Funding. The Plan constitutes a mere promise by the Employer to make benefit payments to such Participants and beneficiaries in the future and Participants and beneficiaries shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Employer. Any Accounts established pursuant to the Plan shall remain the property of the Employer until distributed, and nothing in the Plan will otherwise be construed to create a trust or to obligate the Employer or any other person to segregate a fund, purchase an insurance contract, or in any other way currently to fund the future payment of any benefits hereunder, nor will anything herein be construed to give any employee or any other person rights to any specific assets of the Employer or of any other person. The Employer may, in its sole discretion, create a grantor trust to pay its obligations hereunder, but shall have no obligation to do so. In all events, it is the intent of the Employer that the Plan be treated as unfunded for tax purposes and for purposes of Title I of ERISA.

B.

Nonassignability. None of the benefits, payments, proceeds or claims of any Participant or beneficiary shall be subject to any claim of any creditor of any Participant or beneficiary and, in particular, the same shall not be subject to

9

	attachment or garnishment or other legal process by any creditor of such Participant or beneficiary, nor shall any Participant or beneficiary have any right to alienate, anticipate, commute, pledge, encumber, sell, transfer or assign any of the benefits or payments or proceeds which he may expect to receive, contingently or otherwise, under the Plan.
C.	Limitation of Participants’ Rights. Participation in the Plan shall not give any Eligible Employee the right to be retained in the employ of the Employer or any right or interest in the Plan other than as herein provided. The Employer reserves the right to dismiss any Eligible Employee without any liability for any claim against the Employer, except to the extent provided herein.
D.	Receipt and Release. Any payment to any Participant or beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the Plan shall, to the extent thereof, be in full satisfaction of all claims against the Employer and the Plan Administrator under the Plan, and the Plan Administrator may require such Participant or beneficiary, as a condition precedent to such payment, to execute a receipt and release to such effect. If any Participant or beneficiary is determined by the Plan Administrator to be incompetent by reason of physical or mental disability (including minority) to give a valid receipt and release, the Plan Administrator may cause the payment or payments becoming due to such person to be made to another person for his or her benefit without responsibility on the part of the Plan Administrator or the Employer to follow the application of such funds.
E.	Government Regulations. It is intended that this Plan will comply with all applicable laws and government regulations, and the Employer shall not be obligated to perform an obligation hereunder in any case where, in the opinion of the Employer’s counsel, such performance would result in the violation of any law or regulation.
F.	Governing Law. The Plan shall be construed, administered, and governed in all respects under and by the laws of the State of Georgia. If any provision shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof shall continue to be fully effective.
G.	Headings and Subheadings. Headings and subheadings in this Plan are inserted for convenience only and are not to be considered in the construction of the provisions hereof.

10

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused the Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 11^th day of February, 2008.

Synovus Financial Corp.
By:	/s/ Steven C. Evans
	Title: Senior Vice President

11

Exhibit “A”

Merged Plans

Plan’s Name Date of Merger Terms and Conditions

[RESERVED]

12

Exhibit “B”

Spinoff of Total System Services, Inc.

     1. Spinoff to TSYS Deferred Compensation Plan. In connection with the spinoff of Total System Services, Inc. from the Synovus Financial Corp., the assets and liabilities with respect to participants and beneficiaries of Total System Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates shall be transferred in a tax-free spinoff from this Plan to the TSYS Deferred Compensation Plan (“TSYS Plan”) effective December 31, 2007. The assets and liabilities with respect to such participants and beneficiaries shall be transferred as soon as administratively practicable following the date of the spinoff. In addition, TSYS and its subsidiaries and affiliates shall cease to sponsor this Plan as of December 31, 2007.

     2. Transferees. Any Employee who transfers from Total System Services, Inc. or any subsidiary or affiliate of Total System Services, Inc. (“TSYS”) to the Employer or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Employer from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (a “Synovus Transferee”) shall receive credit for service under this Plan to the same extent such service was recognized under the provisions of the TSYS Plan. This Plan shall recognize all elections (including deferral, investment and distribution elections) and beneficiary designations with respect to Synovus Transferees under the TSYS Plan. In addition, a Participant who transfers from the Employer or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Employer to TSYS or any subsidiary or affiliate of TSYS from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (a “TSYS Transferee”) shall be treated as a transfer instead of a separation of employment under this Plan, and account balances for TSYS Transferees shall be transferred to the TSYS Plan as soon as administratively practicable following their date of transfer.

13

EX-10.33

Exhibit 10.33
REVISED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT

     THIS REVISED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective as of the grant date set forth below by and between SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP., a Georgia corporation (the “Corporation”), and                      (“Executive”).

     WHEREAS, Executive has been awarded Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) under the Corporation’s 2007 Omnibus Plan (“Plan”).

     NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and this Agreement, Executive hereby agrees to the following terms and conditions:

1.	Grant of RSUs
	Executive is hereby granted RSUs as follows:
	Date of Grant:	, 200
	Vesting Period:	Please refer to Section 2 of this Agreement
	Total Number of RSUs:
2.	Vesting of RSUs

(a) Vesting Conditions. If Executive remains in the continuous employ of the Corporation or a Subsidiary of the Corporation through the date(s) indicated in Column I below, the RSUs will become non-forfeitable (i.e., “vest”) to the extent indicated in Column II below:

(I)		(II)
If employment		the % of the RSUs
continues through	then	which vest is
___, 200___			100	%
	[or]
___, 200___			___	%
	[or]
___, 200___			___	%
	[or]
___, 200___			___	%
	[or]
___, 200___			___	%
	[or]
___, 200___			___	%

Such vesting will occur (to the extent indicated in Column (II) above) at the close of business on the applicable date(s) indicated in Column (I) above. Any RSUs which are not vested on the date of Executive’s termination of employment will be forfeited to the Corporation, unless the Compensation Committee in its sole and exclusive discretion determines otherwise.

(b) Effect of Voluntary Termination or Termination for Cause or Suicide. If Executive’s employment with the Corporation and its Subsidiaries is terminated: (i) by Executive voluntarily or (ii) by the Corporation or a Subsidiary for Cause or (iii) by Executive’s death due to suicide before all RSUs vest pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 4(a) above, then any RSUs which are not vested at the time of such termination will be forfeited to the Corporation on the date of such termination, unless the Compensation Committee in its sole and exclusive discretion determines otherwise.

(c) Effect of Death (Other Than by Suicide) or Disability. If Executive’s employment with the Corporation and its Subsidiaries terminates by reason of Executive’s death (other than by suicide) or Disability, then any RSUs which are not vested at the time of such termination will become vested automatically.

(d) Effect of [Retirement or] Leave of Absence. [If Executive’s employment with the Corporation and its Subsidiaries is terminated by reason of Executive’s retirement after attainment of [age 62 and 15 years of Service] [age 65], then any RSUs which are not vested at the time of such retirement will become vested automatically.] A leave of absence which is approved in writing by the Compensation Committee with specific reference to this Agreement will not be considered a termination of Executive’s employment with the Corporation and its Subsidiaries for purposes of this Section 2 or any other provision of this Agreement.

(e) In the event of a Change of Control (as defined in the Plan), the RSUs will vest immediately upon such Change of Control.

(f) No Forfeiture of Vested RSUs. Any RSUs which vest pursuant to the preceding provisions of this Section 2 will not thereafter be forfeited.

3. Conversion of RSUs and Issuance of Shares

Upon vesting of the RSUs, one share of the Corporation’s Common Stock shall be issued for each RSU that vests on such vesting date, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan.

2

4. Transfer of RSUs

Unless otherwise permitted by the Committee, the RSUs may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than pursuant to a will or the laws of descent and distribution. Any attempted disposition in violation of this Agreement and the Plan shall be void.

5. Status of Executive

The Executive shall not be, or have rights as, a stockholder of the Corporation with respect to any of the shares of Common Stock subject to the RSUs unless such RSUs have vested, and shares underlying the RSUs have been issued and delivered to him or her. The Corporation shall not be required to issue or transfer any certificates for shares of Common Stock upon vesting of the RSUs until all applicable requirements of law have been complied with and such shares have been duly listed on any securities exchange on which the Common Stock may then be listed.

6. Dividend Equivalents

The RSUs will be credited with dividend equivalents equal to amount of cash dividend payments that would have otherwise been paid if the shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock represented by the RSUs (including deemed reinvested additional shares attributable to the RSUs pursuant to this paragraph) were actually outstanding. These dividend equivalents will be deemed to be reinvested in additional shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock determined by dividing the deemed cash dividend amount by the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) of a share of the Corporation’s Common Stock on the applicable dividend payment date. Such credited amounts will be added to the RSUs and will vest or be forfeited in accordance with Section 2 based on the vesting or forfeiture of the initial RSUs to which they are attributable. In addition, the RSUs will be credited with any dividends or distributions that are paid in shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock represented by the RSUs and will otherwise be adjusted by the Committee for other capital or corporate events as provided for in the Plan.

7. General Provisions

(a) Administration, Interpretation and Construction. The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement will be administered, interpreted and construed by the Compensation Committee, whose decisions will be final, conclusive and binding on the Corporation, on Executive and on anyone claiming under or through the Corporation or Executive. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any determination as to whether an event has occurred or failed to occur which causes the RSUs to be forfeited pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, will be made in the good faith but absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. By accepting the transfer of RSUs, Executive irrevocably consents and agrees to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and to all actions, decisions and determinations to be taken or made by the Compensation Committee in good faith pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

(b) Withholding. The Corporation will have the right to withhold from any payments to be made to Executive (whether under this Agreement or otherwise) any taxes the Corporation determines it is required to withhold with respect to Executive under the

3

laws and regulations of any governmental authority, whether Federal, state or local and whether domestic or foreign, in connection with this Agreement, including, without limitation, taxes in connection with the transfer of RSUs or the lapse of restrictions on RSUs. Failure to submit any such withholding taxes shall be deemed to cause otherwise lapsed restrictions on RSUs not to lapse.

(c) Rights Not Assignable or Transferable. No rights under this Agreement will be assignable or transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, either voluntarily, or, to the full extent permitted by law, involuntarily, by way of encumbrance, pledge, attachment, levy or charge of any nature except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. Executive’s rights under this Agreement will be exercisable during Executive’s lifetime only by Executive or by Executive’s guardian or legal representative.

(d) Terms and Conditions Binding. The terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and in this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Corporation, its successors and assigns, including any assignee of the Corporation and any successor to the Corporation by merger, consolidation or otherwise, and Executive, Executive’s heirs, devisees and legal representatives. In addition, the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and in this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Mellon and its successors and assigns.

(e) No Employment Rights. No provision of this Agreement or the Plan will be deemed to confer upon Executive any right to continue in the employ of the Corporation or a Subsidiary or will in any way affect the right of the Corporation or a Subsidiary to dismiss or otherwise terminate Executive’s employment at any time for any reason with or without cause, or will be construed to impose upon the Corporation or a Subsidiary any liability for any forfeiture of RSUs which may result under this Agreement if Executive’s employment is so terminated.

(f) No Liability for Good Faith Business Acts or Omissions. Executive recognizes and agrees that the Compensation Committee, the Board, or the officers, agents or employees of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries, in their oversight or conduct of the business and affairs of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries, may in good faith cause the Corporation or a Subsidiary to act, or to omit to act, in a manner that may, directly or indirectly, prevent the RSUs from vesting. No provision of this Agreement will be interpreted or construed to impose any liability upon the Corporation, a Subsidiary, the Compensation Committee, Board or any officer, agent or employee of the Corporation or a Subsidiary, for any forfeiture of RSUs that may result, directly or indirectly, from any such action or omission.

(g) Recapitalization. In the event that Executive receives, with respect to RSUs, any securities or other property (other than cash dividends) as a result of any stock dividend or split, spin-off, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, combination or exchange of shares or a similar corporate change, any such securities or other property received by Executive will likewise be held by Mellon and be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and will be included in the term “RSUs.”

(h) Appointment of Agent. By accepting the transfer of RSUs, Executive irrevocably nominates, constitutes, and appoints Mellon as Executive’s agent for purposes of surrendering or transferring the RSUs to the Corporation upon any forfeiture required or

4

authorized by this Agreement. This power is intended as a power coupled with an interest and will survive Executive’s death. In addition, it is intended as a durable power and will survive Executive’s disability.

(i) Legal Representative. In the event of Executive’s death or a judicial determination of Executive’s incompetence, reference in this Agreement to Executive shall be deemed, where appropriate, to Executive’s heirs or devises.

(j) Titles. The titles to sections or paragraphs of this Agreement are intended solely for convenience and no provision of this Agreement is to be construed by reference to the title of any section or paragraph.

(k) Plan Governs. The RSUs are being transferred to Executive pursuant to and subject to the Plan, a copy of which is available upon request to the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation. The provisions of the Plan are incorporated herein by this reference, and all capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the same meanings given to such terms in the Plan. The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement will be administered, interpreted and construed in accordance with the Plan, and any such term or condition which cannot be so administered, interpreted or construed will to that extent be disregarded.

(l) Complete Agreement. This instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes and replaces all prior agreements and understandings with respect to such subject matter. The parties hereto have made no agreements, representations or warranties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement which are not set forth herein or incorporated by reference.

(m) Amendment; Modification; Wavier. No provision set forth in this Agreement may be amended, modified or waived unless such amendment, modification or waiver shall be authorized by the Compensation Committee and shall be agreed to in writing, signed by Executive and by an officer of the Corporation duly authorized to do so. No waiver by either party hereto of any breach by the other party of any condition or provision set forth in this Agreement to be performed by such other party will be deemed a waiver of a subsequent breach of such condition or provision, or will be deemed a waiver of a similar or dissimilar provision or condition at the same time or at any prior or subsequent time.

(n) Governing Law. The validity, interpretation, performance and enforcement of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia, the state in which the Corporation is incorporated, without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of law of that state.

     The Corporation has issued the RSUs in accordance with the foregoing terms and conditions and in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. By signing below, Executive hereby agrees to the foregoing terms and conditions of the RSUs.

5

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive has set Executive’s hand and seal, effective as of the date and year set forth above.

                                                                                                    (L.S.)

6

EX-10.36

Exhibit 10.36

SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Annual Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers
Approved December 18, 2007

     Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, on December 18, 2007 the Board of Directors of Synovus Financial Corp. approved the following base salaries for its named executive officers, effective January 1, 2008.

Name	Position	Base Salary
Richard E. Anthony	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer	$928,200
Frederick L. Green, III	President and Chief Operating Officer	$562,100
Elizabeth R. James	Vice Chairman, Chief People Officer and Secretary	$431,000
Thomas J. Prescott	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	$387,000

EX-21.1

Exhibit 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.

Ownership				Place of
Percentage			Name	Incorporation
	100	%	Columbus Bank and Trust Company	Georgia
			100% Synovus Trust Company, National Association	National
			100% Synovus Insurance Services of Georgia, Inc.	Georgia
			100% CB&T Housing Fund Investor, L.L.C.	Georgia
			100% CB&T State Tax Credit Fund, L.L.C.	Georgia
			100% CB&T Special Limited Partner, L.L.C.	Georgia
			100% CB&T 11th Street Loft Company, L.L.C.	Georgia
			100% Synovus Equity Investments, Inc.	Georgia
			100% Synovus Callier Partners, LLC	Georgia
			100% Synovus Special Limited Partner LLC	Georgia
			100% Synovus Union Hill, L.L.C.	Georgia
			100% Synovus Pointe Apartments, L.L.C.	Georgia
			100% Synovus South Mall Apartments, L.L.C.	Georgia
			99.99% Tall Pines Apartments, Ltd.	Alabama
			100% Synovus Aspenwood Square, LLC	Georgia
	100	%	Commercial Bank	Georgia
	100	%	Commercial Bank & Trust Company of Troup County	Georgia
	100	%	Security Bank and Trust Company of Albany	Georgia
	100	%	Sumter Bank and Trust Company	Georgia
	100	%	The Coastal Bank of Georgia	Georgia
	100	%	First State Bank and Trust Company of Valdosta	Georgia
	100	%	The Cohutta Banking Company	Georgia
	100	%	Bank of Coweta	Georgia
	100	%	Citizens Bank and Trust of West Georgia	Georgia
			100% Synovus Insurance Services of West Georgia, Inc.	Georgia
	100	%	First Community Bank of Tifton	Georgia
	100	%	CB&T Bank of Middle Georgia	Georgia
	100	%	Sea Island Bank	Georgia
	100	%	Citizens First Bank	Georgia
	100	%	AFB&T	Georgia
			100% Athena Service Corporation	Georgia
	100	%	Citizens & Merchants State Bank	Georgia
	100	%	Bank of North Georgia	Georgia
	100	%	Georgia Bank & Trust	Georgia
	60	%	Total Technology Ventures, LLC	Georgia
	100	%	Creative Financial Group, LTD	Georgia
	100	%	Synovus Securities, Inc.	Georgia
	100	%	GLOBALT, Inc.	Georgia
	100	%	First Commercial Bank of Huntsville	Alabama
			100% DAL LLC	Alabama
			100% KDC LLC	Alabama
	100	%	The Bank of Tuscaloosa	Alabama
	100	%	Sterling Bank	Alabama
			50% Sterling Place, L.L.C.	Alabama
	100	%	First Commercial Bank	Alabama

Ownership				Place of
Percentage			Name	Incorporation
			100% First Commercial Mortgage Corporation	Alabama
			100% First Commercial Credit Corporation	Alabama
			100% Synovus Mortgage Corp.	Alabama
			100% FCB Heritage 1901 Redevelopment LLC	Alabama
			100% Synovus Burger-Phillips, LLC	Alabama
			100% First Holdings, Inc.	Alabama
			100% FCBDE Holdings, Inc.	Delaware
			100% FCBIM Corp.	Georgia
			100% FAL Mortgage Investment Corp	oration Alabama
	100	%	The National Bank of Jasper (AL)	National
			100% Synovus Insurance Services of Alabama, Inc.	Alabama
			100% FNBJ Holdings, Inc.	Alabama
			100% FNBJDE Holdings, Inc.	Delaware
			100% FNBJIM Corp.	Georgia
	100	%	CB&T Bank of East Alabama	Alabama
	100	%	Community Bank & Trust of Southeast Alabama	Alabama
	100	%	The Tallahassee State Bank	Florida
			100% Synovus Insurance Services of Florida, Inc.	Florida
	100	%	Bank of Pensacola	Florida
			100% BOP Investment Company, Inc.	Delaware
			100% BOP Mortgage Investment Corporation	Florida
			100% BOP Properties, Inc.	Florida
	100	%	Vanguard Bank & Trust Company	Florida
			100% VBT Investment Company, Inc.	Delaware
			100% VBT Mortgage Investment Corporation	Florida
	100	%	First Coast Community Bank	Florida
	100	%	Synovus Bank of Tampa Bay	Florida
			100% W.L. Properties, Inc.	Florida
			100% U.O.S. Properties, Inc.	Florida
	100	%	Synovus Bank of Jacksonville	Florida
	100	%	The National Bank of Walton County(GA)	National
	100	%	The National Bank of South Carolina (SC)	National
			100% Synovus Insurance Services of South Carolina, Inc.	South Carolina
			100% NBSC Holdings, Inc.	Delaware
			100% NBSCIM Corp.	Georgia
			100% Synovus Lofts of Greenville, LLC	Georgia
	100	%	The Bank of Nashville	Tennessee
			100% Machinery Leasing Company of North America, Inc.	Tennessee
	100	%	Trust One Bank	Tennessee
	100	%	Cohutta Banking Company of Tennessee	Tennessee
	100	%	First Florida Bank	Florida

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 2-93472, No. 2-94639, No. 33-90630, No. 33-60473, No. 33-60475, No. 333-30937, No. 333-88087, No. 333-38232, No. 333-40368, No. 333-55748, No. 333-74816, No. 333-89278, No. 333-97477, No. 333-103628, No. 333-103613, No. 333-112454, No. 333-116259, No. 333-132739, No. 333-132973, and No. 333-143035) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-37403 and No. 333-104625) on Form S-3 of Synovus Financial Corp. of our reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Synovus Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Synovus Financial Corp.

Our report dated February 29, 2008 on the consolidated financial statements referred to above refers to the adoption of the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Income Taxes —an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 as of January 1, 2007, the adoption of the fair value method of accounting for share-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment as of January 1 2006, the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans in December 2006, and the application of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, in 2006.

Atlanta, Georgia
February 29, 2008

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard E. Anthony, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Synovus Financial Corp.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 29, 2008	/s/ Richard E. Anthony
	Richard E. Anthony
	Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Thomas J. Prescott, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Synovus Financial Corp.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 29, 2008	/s/ Thomas J. Prescott
	Thomas J. Prescott
	Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Richard E. Anthony, the Chief Executive Officer of Synovus Financial Corp. (the “Company”), and Thomas J. Prescott, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 29, 2008	/s/ Richard E. Anthony
	Richard E. Anthony
	Chief Executive Officer
February 29, 2008	/s/ Thomas J. Prescott
	Thomas J. Prescott
	Chief Financial Officer

This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)

EX-99.1

Financial Appendix ­ ­ 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005	F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-42
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	F-43
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-44
Selected Financial Data	F-45
Financial Review	F-46
Summary of Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)	F-78

F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets ­ ­ 

(In thousands, except share data)
	December 31,
	2007			2006
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks, including $18,946 and $41,337 in 2007 and 2006, respectively, on deposit to meet Federal Reserve requirements	$	682,583			713,053
Interest earning deposits with banks		10,950			19,315
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		76,086			101,091
Trading account assets		17,803			15,266
Mortgage loans held for sale		153,437			175,042
Investment securities available for sale		3,666,974			3,352,357
Loans, net of unearned income		26,498,585			24,654,552
Allowance for loan losses		(367,613	)		(314,459	)
Loans, net		26,130,972			24,340,093
Premises and equipment, net		547,437			481,415
Goodwill		519,138			515,719
Other intangible assets, net		28,007			35,693
Other assets		1,185,065			832,280
Assets of discontinued operations		—			1,384,856
Total assets	$	33,018,452			31,966,180
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing retail and commercial deposits	$	3,472,423			3,545,766
Interest bearing retail and commercial deposits		18,199,997			17,968,202
Total retail and commercial deposits		21,672,420			21,513,968
Brokered time deposits		3,287,396			3,014,495
Total deposits		24,959,816			24,528,463
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		2,319,412			1,582,487
Long-term debt		1,890,235			1,343,358
Other liabilities		407,399			432,279
Liabilities of and minority interest in discontinued operations		—			370,943
Total liabilities		29,576,862			28,257,530
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock — $1.00 par value. Authorized 600,000,000 shares; issued 335,529,482 in 2007 and 331,213,913 in 2006; outstanding 329,867,944 in 2007 and 325,552,375 in 2006		335,529			331,214
Additional paid-in capital		1,101,209			1,033,055
Treasury stock, at cost — 5,661,538 shares		(113,944	)		(113,944	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		31,439			(2,129	)
Retained earnings		2,087,357			2,460,454
Total shareholders’ equity		3,441,590			3,708,650
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	33,018,452			31,966,180

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Consolidated Statements of Income ­ ­ 

(In thousands, except per share data)
	Years Ended December 31,
	2007		2006			2005
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	2,046,239		1,859,914			1,375,264
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities		89,597		69,834			53,037
Mortgage-backed securities		67,744		52,469			40,287
State and municipal securities		8,095		9,208			10,072
Other investments		7,290		6,915			5,547
Trading account assets		3,418		2,691			642
Mortgage loans held for sale		9,659		8,638			7,304
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		5,258		6,422			4,082
Interest earning deposits with banks		1,104		375			26
Total interest income		2,238,404		2,016,466			1,496,261
Interest expense:
Deposits		912,472		746,669			408,405
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		92,970		72,958			34,342
Long-term debt		84,014		71,050			88,299
Total interest expense		1,089,456		890,677			531,046
Net interest income		1,148,948		1,125,789			965,215
Provision for losses on loans		170,208		75,148			82,532
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		978,740		1,050,641			882,683
Non-interest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		112,142		112,417			109,960
Fiduciary and asset management fees		50,761		48,627			45,454
Brokerage and investment banking revenue		31,980		26,729			24,487
Mortgage banking income		27,006		29,255			28,682
Bankcard fees		47,770		44,303			38,813
Net gains (losses) on sales of available for sale investment securities		980		(2,118	)		463
Other fee income		39,307		38,743			34,148
Other operating income		79,082		61,474			45,407
Total non-interest income		389,028		359,430			327,414
Non-interest expense:
Salaries and other personnel expense		455,158		450,373			370,223
Net occupancy and equipment expense		112,888		100,270			90,549
Other operating expenses		235,248		213,890			185,985
Visa litigation expense		36,800		—			—
Total non-interest expense		840,094		764,533			646,757
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		527,674		645,538			563,340
Income tax expense		184,739		230,435			204,290
Income from continuing operations		342,935		415,103			359,050
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest		183,370		201,814			157,396
Net income	$	526,305		616,917			516,446
Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.05		1.29			1.15
Net income		1.61		1.92			1.66
Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.04		1.28			1.14
Net income		1.60		1.90			1.64
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		326,849		321,241			311,495
Diluted		329,863		324,232			314,815

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income ­ ­ 

(In thousands, except per share data)
														Accumulated
					Additional									Other
Years Ended December 31,	Shares		Common		Paid-In			Treasury			Unearned			Comprehensive			Retained
2007, 2006, and 2005	Issued		Stock		Capital			Stock			Compensation			Income (Loss)			Earnings			Total
Balance at December 31, 2004		315,636	$	315,636		628,396			(113,944	)		(106	)		8,903			1,802,404			2,641,289
Net income		—		—		—			—			—			—			516,446			516,446
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges		—		—		—			—			—			(2,240	)		—			(2,240	)
Change in unrealized gains/losses on investment securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment		—		—		—			—			—			(28,354	)		—			(28,354	)
Loss on foreign currency translation		—		—		—			—			—			(7,845	)		—			(7,845	)
Other comprehensive loss		—		—		—			—			—			(38,439	)		—			(38,439	)
Comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			478,007
Cash dividends declared — $.73 per share		—		—		—			—			—			—			(227,663	)		(227,663	)
Issuance of restricted stock		146		146		3,807			—			(3,953	)		—			—			—
Amortization of unearned compensation		—		—		—			—			933			—			—			933
Stock options exercised		2,506		2,506		40,619			—			—			—			—			43,125
Stock option tax benefit		—		—		9,505			—			—			—			—			9,505
Ownership change at majority-owned subsidiary		—		—		3,907			—			—			—			—			3,907
Issuance of common stock for acquisitions		8		8		218			—			—			—			—			226
Issuance of common stock under commitment to charitable foundation		5		5		(5	)		—			—			—			—			—
Balance at December 31, 2005		318,301		318,301		686,447			(113,944	)		(3,126	)		(29,536	)		2,091,187			2,949,329
SAB No. 108 adjustment to opening shareholders’ equity		—		—		—			—			—			826			3,434			4,260
Postretirement unfunded health benefit obligation from adoption of SFAS No. 158, net of tax		—		—		—			—			—			(3,212	)		—			(3,212	)
Net Income		—		—		—			—			—			—			616,917			616,917
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges		—		—		—			—			—			3,650			—			3,650
Change in unrealized gains/losses on investment securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment		—		—		—			—			—			13,268			—			13,268
Gain on foreign currency translation		—		—		—			—			—			12,875			—			12,875
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—			29,793			—			29,793
Comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			646,710
Cash dividends declared — $.78 per share		—		—		—			—			—			—			(251,084	)		(251,084	)
Reclassification of unearned compensation to additional paid-in capital upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)		—		—		(3,126	)		—			3,126			—			—			—
Issuance of restricted stock		610		610		(610	)		—			—			—			—			—
Share-based compensation expense		—		—		23,373			—			—			—			—			23,373
Stock options exercised		3,459		3,459		62,051			—			—			—			—			65,510
Stock option tax benefit		—		—		11,390			—			—			—			—			11,390
Ownership change at majority-owned subsidiary		—		—		6,031			—			—			—			—			6,031
Issuance of common stock for acquisitions		8,844		8,844		247,499			—			—			—			—			256,343
Balance at December 31, 2006		331,214		331,214		1,033,055			(113,944	)		—			(2,129	)		2,460,454			3,708,650
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN No. 48				—		—			—			—			—			(230	)		(230	)
Net income		—		—		—			—			—			—			526,305			526,305
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges		—		—		—			—			—			18,334			—			18,334
Change in unrealized gains/losses on investment securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment		—		—		—			—			—			31,251			—			31,251
Amortization of postretirement unfunded health benefit, net of tax		—		—		—			—			—			817			—			817
Gain on foreign currency translation		—		—		—						—			6,151						6,151
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—			56,553			—			56,553
Comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			582,858
Cash dividends declared — $.82 per share		—		—		—			—			—			—			(269,082	)		(269,082	)
Issuance of restricted stock		552		552		(552	)		—			—			—			—			—
Share-based compensation expense		—		—		21,540			—			—			—			—			21,540
Stock options exercised		3,702		3,702		60,148			—			—			—			—			63,850
Stock option tax benefit		—		—		15,937			—			—			—			—			15,937
Issuance of common stock for acquisitions		61		61		2,054			—			—			—			—			2,115
Spin-off of TSYS						(30,973	)		—			—			(22,985	)		(630,090	)		(684,048	)
Balance at December 31, 2007		335,529	$	335,529		1,101,209			(113,944	)		—			31,439			2,087,357			3,441,590

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ­ ­ 

(In thousands)
	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
Operating Activities
Net income	$	526,305			616,917			516,446
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for losses on loans		170,208			75,148			82,532
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion, net		208,270			231,288			193,152
Equity in income of equity investments		(10,463	)		(14,726	)		(6,135	)
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(28,057	)		(44,970	)		(53,575	)
Increase in interest receivable		(11,774	)		(84,457	)		(40,853	)
Increase in interest payable		830			74,422			23,363
Minority interest in subsidiaries’ net income		47,521			48,102			37,381
Decrease (increase) in trading account assets		(2,537	)		12,056			(27,322	)
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale		(1,328,905	)		(1,550,099	)		(1,414,357	)
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale		1,378,999			1,547,765			1,415,213
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale		(27,105	)		(29,211	)		(23,835	)
Increase in prepaid and other assets		(192,921	)		(150,668	)		(80,982	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued salaries and benefits		(33,428	)		6,781			37,953
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		(68,906	)		6,719			(26,422	)
Net (gains) losses on sales of available for sale investment securities		(980	)		2,118			(463	)
Gain on sale of loans		—			(1,975	)		—
Gain on sale of other assets		(6,303	)		(5,436	)		—
Increase in fair value of private equity investments		(16,497	)		(6,346	)		—
Gain from transfer of mutual funds		(6,885	)		—			—
Visa litigation expense		36,800			—			—
Share-based compensation		36,509			27,163			1,999
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements		(14,066	)		(10,460	)		—
Impairment of developed software		1,740			—			3,619
Other, net		7,410			39,330			(10,506	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		665,765			789,461			627,208
Investing Activities
Net cash paid for acquisitions		(12,552	)		(53,664	)		(56,995	)
Net (increase) decrease in interest earning deposits with banks		8,365			(16,409	)		1,173
Net (increase) decrease in federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		25,005			(27,387	)		66,549
Proceeds from maturities and principal collections of investment securities available for sale		721,679			676,492			660,085
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale		25,482			130,457			50,048
Purchases of investment securities available for sale		(1,015,303	)		(1,051,733	)		(1,019,585	)
Proceeds from sale of commercial loans		—			32,813			—
Net increase in loans		(2,071,602	)		(2,498,467	)		(1,990,774	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(168,202	)		(140,143	)		(106,674	)
Proceeds from disposals of premises and equipment		790			1,201			1,708
Net proceeds from transfer of mutual funds		6,885			—			—
Proceeds from sale of other assets		—			5,632			—
Additions to other intangible assets		—			(6,446	)		—
Contract acquisition costs		(22,740	)		(42,452	)		(19,468	)
Additions to licensed computer software from vendors		(33,382	)		(11,858	)		(12,875	)
Additions to internally developed computer software		(17,785	)		(13,973	)		(22,602	)
Dividend paid by TSYS to minority shareholders		(126,717	)		(9,765	)		(7,492	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,680,077	)		(3,025,702	)		(2,456,902	)
Financing Activities
Net increase in demand and savings deposits		666,484			948,033			1,354,258
Net increase in certificates of deposit		3,263			1,738,743			852,639
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		736,925			361,401			(49,411	)
Principal repayments on long-term debt		(294,269	)		(760,937	)		(617,177	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		1,087,079			127,203			672,666
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements		14,066			10,460			—
Dividends paid to shareholders		(264,930	)		(244,654	)		(224,303	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		63,850			65,510			43,125
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,012,468			2,245,759			2,031,797
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalent balances held in foreign currencies		4,970			(429	)		(4,252	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		3,126			9,089			197,851
Cash retained by TSYS		(210,518	)		—			—
Cash and due from banks at beginning of year		889,975			880,886			683,035
Cash and due from banks at end of year	$	682,583			889,975			880,886

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Note 1  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business Operations

The consolidated financial statements of Synovus include the accounts of Synovus Financial Corp. (Parent Company) and its consolidated subsidiaries. Synovus provides integrated financial services including banking, financial management, insurance, mortgage, and leasing services through 37 wholly-owned affiliate banks and other Synovus offices in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Florida, and Tennessee.

Basis of Presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of Synovus conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and to general practices within the banking and financial services industries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses; the valuation of other real estate; the valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill, and other intangible assets; and the disclosures for contingent assets and liabilities. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of certain impaired loans and other real estate, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties and properties collateralizing impaired loans.

On December 31, 2007, Synovus completed the tax-free spin-off of Total System Services, Inc. (TSYS) common stock to Synovus shareholders. Accordingly, the results of operations and assets and liabilities of Synovus’ former majority owned subsidiary, TSYS, have been reported as discontinued operations. As a result of the spin-off of TSYS, Synovus has only one business segment as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” Synovus’ statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 include, without segregation, cash flows of both continuing operations and discontinued operations. See Note 2 for further discussion of discontinued operations and the TSYS spin-off.

Following is a description of the more significant of Synovus’ accounting and reporting policies.

Cash Flow Information

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information is as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)	2007		2006		2005
Cash paid during the year for:
Income taxes	$	440.7		391.4		323.0
Interest		1,068.9		806.4		505.7
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Loans receivable transferred to other real estate		111.1		33.0		20.0
Loans charged off to allowance for loan losses		131.2		72.8		67.2
Common stock issued in business combinations		1.9		240.6		0.2

The tax-free spin-off of TSYS common stock completed on December 31, 2007 represents a $684.0 million non-cash distribution of the net assets of TSYS, net of minority interest, to Synovus shareholders.

Federal Funds Sold, Federal Funds Purchased, Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements, and Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements

Federal funds sold, federal funds purchased, securities purchased under resale agreements, and securities sold under repurchase agreements generally mature in one day.

Trading Account Assets

Trading account assets, which include both debt and equity securities, are reported at fair value. Fair value adjustments and fees from trading account activities are included as a component of other fee income. Gains and losses realized from the sale of trading account assets are determined by specific identification and are included as a component of other fee income on the trade date. Interest income on trading assets is reported as a component of interest income.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value, unless they are hedged by forward sales commitments in which case they are carried at fair value. Fair value is based on forward sales commitments, or upon quoted prices from secondary market investors. No valuation allowances were required at December 31, 2007 or 2006. The

F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

cost of mortgage loans held for sale is the mortgage note amount less discounts and unearned fees.

Investment Securities Available for Sale

Available for sale securities are recorded at fair value. Fair value is determined at a specific point in time, based on quoted market prices. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, net of the related tax effect, are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), until realized.

A decline in the fair market value of any available for sale security below cost that is deemed other than temporary results in a charge to earnings and the establishment of a new cost basis for the security.

Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment to the yield using the effective interest method and prepayment assumptions. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses for securities classified as available for sale are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the amortized cost of securities sold.

Gains and losses on sales of investment securities are recognized on the settlement date, based on the amortized cost of the specific security. The financial statement impact of settlement date accounting versus trade date accounting is inconsequential.

Loans and Interest Income

Loans are reported at principal amounts outstanding less unearned income, net deferred fees and expenses, and the allowance for loan losses.

Interest income on consumer loans, made on a discount basis, is recognized in a manner which approximates the level yield method. Interest income on substantially all other loans is recognized on a level yield basis.

Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual loans. Accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when reasonable doubt exists as to the full collection of interest or principal, or when they become contractually in default for 90 days or more as to either interest or principal, unless they are both well-secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued and uncollected interest is charged to interest income on loans, unless management believes that the accrued interest is recoverable through the liquidation of collateral. Interest payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied as a reduction of principal. Loans are returned to accruing status when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest. Interest is accrued on impaired loans as long as such loans do not meet the criteria for nonaccrual classification.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through the provision for losses on loans charged to operations. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collection of principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries are added to the allowance. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on a formal analysis which assesses the probable loss within the loan portfolio. This analysis includes consideration of loan portfolio quality, historical performance, current economic conditions, level of nonperforming loans, loan concentrations, and review of impaired loans.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the subsidiary banks’ allowances for loan losses. Such agencies may require the subsidiary banks to recognize adjustments to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Management, considering current information and events regarding a borrowers’ ability to repay its obligations, considers a loan to be impaired when the ultimate collectibility of all amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, is in doubt. When a loan is considered to be impaired, it is placed on nonaccrual status and the amount of impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. If the loan is collateral-dependent, the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs is used to determine the amount of impairment. Estimated losses on collateral dependent impaired loans are typically charged off. Estimated losses on all other impaired loans are included in the allowance for loan losses through a charge to the provision for losses on loans.

The accounting for impaired loans described above applies to all loans, except for large pools of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, and loans that are measured at fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. The allowance for loan losses for loans not considered impaired and for large pools of smaller-balance,

F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

homogeneous loans is established through consideration of such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, individual loan risk ratings, loan concentrations, and historical charge-off trends.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements and purchased internal-use software, are reported at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization which are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The Company reviews long-lived assets, such as premises and equipment, for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill, which represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired of purchased companies, is tested for impairment at least annually. Synovus has established its annual impairment test date as June 30. To test for goodwill impairment, Synovus identifies its reporting units and determines the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units. Synovus then compares the carrying value of each unit to its fair value to determine whether impairment exists. No impairment losses have been recorded as a result of Synovus’ annual goodwill impairment analyses during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005. Due to a higher level of credit losses during the second half of 2007, Synovus retested goodwill for impairment as of December 31, 2007. No impairment losses were identified as a result of the December 31, 2007 test.

Identifiable intangible assets relate primarily to core deposit premiums, resulting from the valuation of core deposit intangibles acquired in business combinations or in the purchase of branch offices, customer relationships, and customer contract premiums resulting from the acquisition of investment advisory and transaction processing businesses. These identifiable intangible assets are amortized using accelerated methods over periods not exceeding the estimated average remaining life of the existing customer deposits, customer relationships, or contracts acquired. Amortization periods range from 3 to 15 years. Amortization periods for intangible assets are monitored to determine if events and circumstances require such periods to be reduced.

Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. With the exception of goodwill, recoverability of the intangible assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the amount of impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets based on the discounted expected future cash flows to be generated by the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying value or fair value less costs to sell.

Other Assets

Other assets include accrued interest receivable and other significant balances as described below.

Investments in Company-Owned Life Insurance Programs

Investments in company-owned life insurance programs are recorded at the net realizable value of the underlying insurance contracts. The change in contract value during the period is recorded as an adjustment of premiums paid in determining the expense or income to be recognized under the contract during the period. Income or expense from company-owned life insurance programs is included as a component of other operating income.

Other Real Estate

Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, determined on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale and any subsequent adjustments to the value are recorded as a component of other operating expenses.

Private Equity Investments

Private equity investments are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in other operating income in the results of operations in accordance with AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies. For private equity investments, Synovus uses information provided by the fund managers in the initial determination of estimated fair value. Valuation factors such as recent or proposed purchase or sale of debt or equity of Synovus, pricing by other dealers in similar securities, size of position held, liquidity of the market and changes in economic conditions affecting the issuer are used in the final determination of estimated fair value.

F-8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Derivative Instruments

Synovus’ risk management policies emphasize the management of interest rate risk within acceptable guidelines. Synovus’ objective in maintaining these policies is to achieve consistent growth in net interest income while limiting volatility arising from changes in interest rates. Risks to be managed include both fair value and cash flow risks. Utilization of derivative financial instruments provides a valuable tool to assist in the management of these risks.

In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of SFAS No. 133,” all derivative instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at their respective fair values.

The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and if so, on the reason for holding it. If certain conditions are met, entities may elect to designate a derivative instrument as a hedge of exposures to changes in fair values, cash flows, or foreign currencies. If the hedged exposure is a fair value exposure, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in earnings in the period of change, together with the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. If the hedged exposure is a cash flow exposure, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedged item is reported initially as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (outside earnings), and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. Any amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, as well as the ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, are reported in earnings immediately. If the derivative instrument is not designated as a hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in earnings in the period of change. At December 31, 2007, Synovus does not have any derivative instruments which are measured for ineffectiveness using the short-cut method.

With the exception of commitments to fund and sell fixed-rate mortgage loans and derivatives utilized to meet the financing, interest rate and equity risk management needs of its customers, all derivatives utilized by Synovus to manage its interest rate sensitivity are designed as either a hedge of a recognized fixed-rate asset or liability (a fair value hedge), or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of future cash flows of a floating rate asset or liability (cash flow hedge). Synovus does not speculate using derivative instruments.

Synovus utilizes interest rate swap agreements to hedge the fair value risk of fixed-rate balance sheet liabilities, primarily deposit liabilities. Fair value risk is measured as the volatility in the value of these liabilities as interest rates change. Interest rate swaps entered into to manage this risk are designed to have the same notional value, as well as similar interest rates and interest calculation methods. These agreements entitle Synovus to receive fixed-rate interest payments and pay floating-rate interest payments based on the notional amount of the swap agreements. Swap agreements structured in this manner allow Synovus to effectively hedge the fair value risks of these fixed-rate liabilities. Ineffectiveness from fair value hedges is recognized in the consolidated statements of income as other operating income.

Synovus is potentially exposed to cash flow risk due to its holding of loans whose interest payments are based on floating rate indices. Synovus monitors changes in these exposures and their impact on its risk management activities and uses interest rate swap agreements to hedge the cash flow risk. These agreements entitle Synovus to receive fixed-rate interest payments and pay floating-rate interest payments. The maturity date of the agreement with the longest remaining term to maturity is July 9, 2012. These agreements allow Synovus to offset the variability of floating rate loan interest received with the variable interest payments paid on the interest rate swaps. The ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges is recognized in the consolidated statements of income as other operating income.

In 2005, Synovus entered into certain forward starting swap contracts to hedge the cash flow risk of certain forecasted interest payments on a forecasted debt issuance. Upon the determination to issue debt, Synovus was potentially exposed to cash flow risk due to changes in market interest rates prior to the placement of the debt. The forward starting swaps allowed Synovus to hedge this exposure. Upon placement of the debt, these swaps were cash settled concurrent with the pricing of the debt. The effective portion of the cash flow hedge previously included in accumulated other comprehensive income is being amortized over the life of the debt issue as an adjustment to interest expense.

By using derivatives to hedge fair value and cash flow risks, Synovus exposes itself to potential credit risk from the counterparty to the hedging instrument. This credit risk is normally a small percentage of the notional amount and fluctuates as interest rates change. Synovus analyzes and approves credit risk for all potential derivative counterparties prior to execution of any derivative transaction. Synovus minimizes credit risk by dealing with highly rated counterparties, and by obtaining collateralization for exposures above certain predetermined limits.

F-9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Synovus also holds derivative instruments which consist of commitments to fund fixed-rate mortgage loans to customers (interest rate lock commitments) and forward commitments to sell mortgage-backed securities and individual fixed-rate mortgage loans. Synovus’ objective in obtaining the forward commitments is to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with the commitments to fund the fixed-rate mortgage loans and the mortgage loans that are held for sale. Both the interest rate lock commitments and the forward commitments are reported at fair value, with adjustments being recorded in current period earnings. Certain forward sales commitments are accounted for as hedges of mortgage loans held for sale.

Synovus also enters into derivative financial instruments to meet the financing, interest rate and equity risk management needs of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, Synovus enters into offsetting positions to minimize interest rate and equity price risk to Synovus. These derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings. These instruments, and their offsetting positions, are recorded in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

Non-Interest Income

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts

Service charges on deposit accounts consist of non-sufficient funds fees, account analysis fees, and other service charges on deposits which consist primarily of monthly account fees. Non-sufficient funds fees are recognized at the time when the account overdraft occurs. Account analysis fees consist of fees charged to certain commercial demand deposit accounts based upon account activity (and reduced by a credit which is based upon cash levels in the account). These fees, as well as monthly account fees, are recorded under the accrual method of accounting.

Fiduciary and Asset Management Fees

Fiduciary and asset management fees are generally determined based upon market values of assets under management as of a specified date during the period. These fees are recorded under the accrual method of accounting as the services are performed.

Brokerage and Investment Banking Revenue

Brokerage revenue consists primarily of commission income, which represents the spread between buy and sell transactions processed, and net fees charged to customers on a transaction basis for buy and sell transactions processed. Commission income is recorded on a trade-date basis. Brokerage revenue also includes portfolio management fees which represent monthly fees charged on a contractual basis to customers for the management of their investment portfolios and are recorded under the accrual method of accounting.

Investment banking revenue represents fees for services arising from securities offerings or placements in which Synovus acts as the agent. It also includes fees earned from providing advisory services. Revenue is recognized at the time the underwriting is completed and the revenue is reasonably determinable.

Mortgage Banking Income

Mortgage banking income consists primarily of gains and losses from the sale of mortgage loans. Mortgage loans are sold servicing released, without recourse or continuing involvement and satisfy SFAS No. 140 criteria for sale accounting. Gains (losses) on the sale of mortgage loans are determined and recognized at the time the sale proceeds are received and represent the difference between net sales proceeds and the carrying value of the loans at the time of sale adjusted for recourse obligations, if any, retained by Synovus.

Bankcard Fees

Bankcard fees consist primarily of interchange and merchant fees earned, net of fees paid, on debit card and credit card transactions. Net fees are recognized into income as they are collected.

Income Taxes

Synovus files a consolidated federal tax return with its wholly-owned and significant majority owned subsidiaries. Synovus accounts for income taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances against the carrying amount of a deferred tax asset are established when necessary to reflect the decreased likelihood of full realization of a deferred tax asset in the future. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Synovus adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48) as of January 1, 2007. FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain

F-10

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 provides a two-step process in the evaluation of a tax position. The first step is recognition. A company determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including a resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based upon the technical merits of the position. The second step is measurement. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Upon adoption as of January 1, 2007, Synovus recognized a $1.4 million decrease in the liability for uncertain tax positions, with a corresponding increase in retained earnings of $1.4 million as a cumulative effect adjustment.

Significant estimates used in accounting for income taxes relate to the determination of taxable income, the determination of temporary differences between book and tax bases, as well as estimates on the realizability of tax credits.

Share-Based Compensation

Synovus adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, effective January 1, 2006 and elected to use the modified prospective transition method. SFAS No. 123R was effective for all unvested awards at January 1, 2006 and for all awards granted or modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date. This statement requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions) and recognize compensation expense over the future service period.

Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123R, Synovus accounted for its fixed share-based compensation in accordance with the provisions set forth in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, compensation expense was recorded on the grant date only to the extent that the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price on the grant date.

Postretirement Benefits

Synovus sponsors a defined benefit health care plan for substantially all of its employees and early retirees. The expected costs of retiree health care and other postretirement benefits are being expensed over the period that employees provide service.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and other information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale, at one time, the entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a portion of the financial instruments, fair value estimates are also based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments, without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments include deferred income taxes, premises and equipment, computer software, equity method investments, goodwill and other intangible assets. In addition, the income tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments.” SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” SFAS No. 155 resolves issues addressed in Statement No. 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, “Application of Statement No. 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.” SFAS No. 155 eliminates the exemption from applying SFAS No. 133 to interests in securitized financial assets so that similar instruments are accounted for similarly regardless of the form of the instruments. SFAS No. 155 also permits election of fair value measurement at acquisition, at issuance, or when a previously recognized financial instrument is subject to a re-measurement event, on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The provisions of this statement were effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of the entity’s first fiscal year that began after September 15, 2006. Synovus adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 155 effective January 1, 2007. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 155

F-11

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

was not material to Synovus’ financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets.” SFAS No. 156 amends SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations and requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. The provisions of this statement were effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that began after September 15, 2006. Synovus adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 156 effective January 1, 2007. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 156 was not material to Synovus’ financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-5, “Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance — Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4” (EITF 06-5). EITF 06-5 requires that a determination of the amount that could be realized under an insurance contract should (1) consider any additional amounts beyond cash surrender value included in the contractual terms of the policy and (2) be based on an assumed surrender at the individual policy or certificate level, unless all policies or certificates are required to be surrendered as a group. Synovus adopted EITF 06-05 effective January 1, 2007. The impact of adoption of EITF 06-05 was not material to Synovus’ financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” In December 2006, Synovus adopted the provisions of SAB No. 108, which clarifies the way that a company should evaluate an identified unadjusted error for materiality. SAB No. 108 requires that the effect of misstatements that were not corrected at the end of the prior year be considered in quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. Two techniques were identified as being used by companies in practice to accumulate and quantify misstatements — the “rollover” approach and the “iron curtain” approach. The rollover approach, which is the approach that Synovus previously used, quantifies a misstatement based on the amount of the error originating in the current year income statement. Thus, this approach ignores the effects of correcting the portion of the current year balance sheet misstatement that originated in prior years. The iron curtain approach quantifies a misstatement based on the effects of correcting the misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the current year, irrespective of the misstatement’s year(s) of origination. The primary weakness of the iron curtain approach is that it does not consider the correction of prior year misstatements in the current year to be errors.

Using the rollover approach resulted in an accumulation of misstatements to Synovus’ balance sheets that were deemed immaterial to Synovus’ financial statements because the amounts that originated in each year were quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial. Synovus has elected, as allowed under SAB No. 108, to reflect the effect of initially applying this guidance by adjusting the carrying amount of the impacted accounts as of the beginning of 2006 and recording an offsetting adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in 2006. Accordingly, Synovus recorded a cumulative adjustment to increase retained earnings by $3.4 million upon the adoption of SAB No. 108.

The following table presents a description of the individual adjustments included in the cumulative adjustment to retained earnings:

				Nature of
				Error
				Being	Years
(In millions)	Adjustment			Corrected	Impacted
Brokered time deposits	$	(10.3	)	Adjusted to reflect incorrect use of hedges	2003-2005
Deferred income tax liability		3.8		Adjusted to reflect tax effect of incorrect use of hedges	2003-2005
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(0.8	)	Adjusted to reflect incorrect use of hedges	2004-2005
Deferred income tax liability		10.7		Adjusted to reflect impact of calculation errors	1993-2005
Total increase in retained earnings	$	3.4

In the first quarter of 2003, Synovus entered into interest rate swaps to hedge the fair value of certain brokered time deposits. Effectiveness was measured using the short-cut method. Upon further review of these arrangements at September 30, 2005, Synovus determined that these hedges did not qualify for the shortcut method of hedge accounting as the broker placement fee for the related certificates of deposit was factored into the pricing of the swaps. The hedging relationships were redesignated on September 30, 2005, using the cumulative dollar offset method to measure effectiveness. The

F-12

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

prior years’ adjustments were evaluated under the rollover approach and the correction of these misstatements was not material to Synovus’ results of operations in any of the years impacted. Brokered time deposits were increased by the amount of the cumulative fair value basis adjustment and the associated deferred tax liability was removed, resulting in a net decrease in shareholders’ equity of $6.5 million, to correct the incorrect use of hedge accounting.

In the fourth quarter of 2004, Synovus entered into certain forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge the future interest payments on debt forecasted to be issued in 2005. Synovus accounted for these arrangements as cash flow hedges. Upon further review of these arrangements, during the second quarter of 2005, it was determined that the swaps did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The hedging relationships were redesignated during the second quarter of 2005. The prior years’ adjustments were evaluated under the rollover approach and the correction of these misstatements was not material to Synovus’ results of operations in any of the years impacted. Accumulated other comprehensive losses were decreased and retained earnings were increased by $0.8 million, respectively, to correct the incorrect use of hedge accounting.

From 1993 through 2005, Synovus had errors in its calculation of deferred taxes for temporary differences related to certain business combinations and premises and equipment. The prior years’ errors were evaluated under the rollover approach and the correction of these misstatements was not material to Synovus results of operations in any of the years impacted. The deferred income tax liability was reduced by $10.7 million to correct the calculation errors.

Reclassifications

Certain prior years amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in 2007.

Note 2  Discontinued Operations

Transfer of Mutual Funds

During 2007, Synovus transferred its proprietary mutual funds (Synovus Funds) to a non-affiliated third party. As a result of the transfer, Synovus received gross proceeds of $8.0 million and incurred transaction related costs of $1.1 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $6.9 million, or $4.2 million after-tax. The net gain has been reported as a component of income from discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Financial results of the business associated with the Synovus Funds for 2007, 2006, and 2005 have not been presented as discontinued operations as such amounts are inconsequential. This business did not have significant assets, liabilities, revenues, or expenses associated with it.

TSYS Spin-Off

On December 31, 2007, Synovus completed the tax-free spin-off of its shares of TSYS common stock to Synovus shareholders. The distribution of approximately 80.6% of TSYS’ outstanding shares owned by Synovus was made to shareholders of record on December 18, 2007 (the “record date”). Each Synovus shareholder received 0.483921 of a share of TSYS common stock for each share of Synovus common stock held as of the record date. Synovus shareholders received cash in lieu of fractional shares for amounts of less than one share of TSYS common stock.

Pursuant to the agreement and plan of distribution, TSYS paid on a pro rata basis to its shareholders, including Synovus, a one-time cash dividend of $600 million or $3.0309 per TSYS share based on the number of TSYS shares outstanding as of the record date of December 17, 2007. Based on the number of TSYS shares owned by Synovus as of the record date, Synovus received $483.8 million in proceeds from this one-time cash dividend. The dividend was paid on December 31, 2007.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” the current period and historical consolidated results of operations of TSYS, as well as all costs associated with the spin-off of TSYS, are now presented as a component of income from discontinued operations. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 does not include assets and liabilities of TSYS, while all prior period assets and liabilities of TSYS are presented as discontinued operations.

F-13

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

The following amounts have been segregated from continuing operations and included in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest, in the consolidated statements of income:

	Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006		2005
TSYS revenues	$	1,835,412			1,806,604		1,615,528
TSYS income, net of minority interest and before income taxes		335,567			327,995		260,682
Income tax expense		143,668			126,181		103,286
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		191,899			201,814		157,396
Spin-off related expenses incurred by Synovus, before tax		13,858			—		—
Income tax benefit		(1,129	)		—		—
Spin-off related expenses incurred by Synovus, net of income tax benefit		12,729			—		—
Gain on transfer of mutual funds, before income taxes		6,885			—		—
Income tax expense		2,685			—		—
Gain on transfer of mutual funds, net of income taxes		4,200			—		—
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest	$	183,370			201,814		157,396

The following assets and liabilities have been segregated and included in assets of discontinued operations and liabilities of and minority interest in discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006:

	December 31,
(In thousands)	2006
Cash	$	176,922
Interest earning deposits with banks		74
Premises and equipment, net		271,323
Contract acquisition costs and computer software, net		383,899
Goodwill, net		153,796
Other intangible assets, net		27,891
Other assets		370,951
Assets of discontinued operations	$	1,384,856
Long-term debt		6,781
Other liabilities		364,162
Liabilities of and minority interest in discontinued operations	$	370,943

Synovus adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007. Upon adoption, Synovus recognized a $2.0 million increase in the liability for uncertain tax positions, a corresponding decrease in minority interest of $377 thousand, and a decrease in retained earnings of $1.6 million as a cumulative effect adjustment with respect to discontinued operations.

Cash flows of discontinued operations are presented below.

	Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Cash provided by operating activities	$	341,728			385,759			240,589
Cash used in investing activities		(162,476	)		(164,179	)		(191,819	)
Cash used in financing activities		(376,685	)		(69,597	)		(38,755	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		4,970			(429	)		(4,252	)
Cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations	$	(192,463	)		151,554			5,763

Note 3  Business Combinations

Effective on March 25, 2006, Synovus acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Riverside Bancshares, Inc., the parent company of Riverside Bank (Riverside), headquartered in Marietta, Georgia. Concurrent with the acquisition, Riverside was merged into a subsidiary of Synovus, Bank of North Georgia. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the results of operations of Riverside Bancshares have been included in Synovus’ consolidated financial statements beginning March 25, 2006.

The aggregate purchase price was $171.4 million, consisting of 5,883,426 shares of Synovus common stock valued at $159.8 million, stock options valued at $11.4 million, and $182 thousand in direct acquisition costs. During the first quarter of 2007, Synovus completed the allocation of the purchase price

F-14

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

of this acquisition to the respective assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed.

The final purchase price allocation is presented below.

Riverside Bancshares, Inc.

(In thousands)
Cash and due from banks	$	13,041
Investment securities		116,604
Loans, net		469,983
Premises and equipment		11,973
Goodwill		123,364
Core deposits premium		6,861
Other intangible assets		1,249
Other assets		22,389
Total assets acquired		765,464
Deposits*		491,739
Federal funds purchased		2,069
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		50,670
Long-term debt		37,683
Other liabilities		11,921
Total liabilities assumed		594,082
Net assets acquired	$	171,382

* Includes time deposits in the amount of $176.7 million.

Effective on April 1, 2006, Synovus acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Banking Corporation of Florida, the parent company of First Florida Bank (First Florida), headquartered in Naples, Florida. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the results of operations of First Florida have been included in Synovus’ consolidated financial statements beginning April 1, 2006.

The aggregate purchase price was $84.8 million, consisting of 2,938,791 shares of Synovus common stock valued at $80.1 million, stock options valued at $4.7 million and $24 thousand in direct acquisition costs. During the first quarter of 2007, Synovus completed the allocation of the purchase price of this acquisition to the respective assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed.

The final purchase price allocation is presented below.

Banking Corporation of Florida

(In thousands)
Cash and due from banks	$	2,595
Federal funds sold		4,782
Investment securities		5,655
Loans, net		341,825
Premises and equipment		2,317
Goodwill		54,849
Core deposits premium		1,172
Other intangible assets		937
Other assets		3,655
Total assets acquired		417,787
Deposits*		321,283
Long-term debt		10,269
Other liabilities		1,405
Total liabilities assumed		332,957
Net assets acquired	$	84,830

* Includes time deposits in the amount of $231.9 million.

Note 4  Trading Account Assets

The following table summarizes trading account assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

(In thousands)	2007		2006
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities	$	162		830
Mortgage-backed securities		16,839		13,715
State and municipal securities		462		54
Other investments		340		667
Total	$	17,803		15,266

F-15

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Note 5  Investment Securities Available for Sale

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair values of investment securities available for sale at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2007
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities	$	1,916,005		30,639		(1,263	)		1,945,381
Mortgage-backed securities		1,436,445		6,714		(12,836	)		1,430,323
State and municipal securities		161,697		3,178		(319	)		164,556
Equity securities		114,205		25		—			114,230
Other investments		12,560		—		(76	)		12,484
Total	$	3,640,912		40,556		(14,494	)		3,666,974

	December 31, 2006
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities	$	1,783,313		4,784		(17,527	)		1,770,570
Mortgage-backed securities		1,291,895		4,054		(20,591	)		1,275,358
State and municipal securities		192,593		4,059		(467	)		196,185
Equity securities		95,332		1,021		—			96,353
Other investments		13,976		—		(85	)		13,891
Total	$	3,377,109		13,918		(38,670	)		3,352,357

Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

	December 31, 2007
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(In thousands)	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities	$	104,857		(218	)		335,372		(1,045	)		440,229		(1,263	)
Mortgage-backed securities		356,124		(1,314	)		527,472		(11,522	)		883,596		(12,836	)
State and municipal securities		8,459		(55	)		12,745		(264	)		21,204		(319	)
Equity securities		—		—			—		—			—		—
Other investments		—		—			1,674		(76	)		1,674		(76	)
Total	$	469,440		(1,587	)		877,263		(12,907	)		1,346,703		(14,494	)

F-16

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

	December 31, 2006
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
U.S. Treasury and U.S Government agency securities	$	208,942		(419	)		1,118,599		(17,108	)		1,327,541		(17,527	)
Mortgage-backed securities		205,418		(618	)		717,797		(19,973	)		923,215		(20,591	)
State and municipal securities		11,637		(61	)		20,281		(406	)		31,918		(467	)
Equity securities		—		—			—		—			—		—
Other investments		926		(74	)		1,001		(11	)		1,927		(85	)
Total	$	426,923		(1,172	)		1,857,678		(37,498	)		2,284,601		(38,670	)

U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities.  The unrealized losses in this category consist primarily of unrealized losses in direct obligations of U.S. Government agencies and were caused by interest rate increases. Because Synovus has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, Synovus does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006.

Mortgage-backed securities.  The unrealized losses on investment in mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases. At December 31, 2007, all of the collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed pass-through securities held by Synovus were issued or backed by U.S. Government agencies. These securities are rated AAA by both Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality and because Synovus has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, Synovus does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value by contractual maturity of investment securities available for sale at December 31, 2007 are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized		Estimated
(In thousands)	Cost		Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and U.S
Government agency securities:
Within 1 year	$	420,911		420,352
1 to 5 years		735,637		748,714
5 to 10 years		532,934		546,154
More than 10 years		226,523		230,161
	$	1,916,005		1,945,381

F-17

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

	Amortized		Estimated
(In thousands)	Cost		Fair Value
State and municipal securities:
Within 1 year	$	16,380		16,450
1 to 5 years		62,151		63,345
5 to 10 years		67,311		68,801
More than 10 years		15,855		15,960
	$	161,697		164,556
Other investments:
Within 1 year	$	850		848
1 to 5 years		1,247		1,247
5 to 10 years		1,800		1,800
More than 10 years		8,663		8,589
	$	12,560		12,484
Equity securities	$	114,205		114,230
Mortgage-backed securities	$	1,436,445		1,430,323
Total investment securities:	$	3,640,912		3,666,974
Within 1 year	$	438,141		437,650
1 to 5 years		799,035		813,306
5 to 10 years		602,045		616,755
More than 10 years		251,041		254,710
Equity securities		114,205		114,230
Mortgage-backed securities		1,436,445		1,430,323
	$	3,640,912		3,666,974

A summary of sales transactions in the investment securities available for sale portfolio for 2007, 2006, and 2005 is as follows:

			Gross		Gross
			Realized		Realized
(In thousands)	Proceeds		Gains		Losses
2007	$	25,482		1,056		(76	)
2006		130,457		—		(2,118	)
2005		50,048		744		(281	)

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, investment securities with a carrying value of $3.1 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, were pledged to secure certain deposits, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advance, as required by law and contractual agreements.

Note 6   Loans

Loans outstanding, by classification, are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006
Commercial:
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural	$	6,424,499			5,874,204
Owner occupied		4,239,639			4,054,728
Real estate — construction		8,007,794			7,517,611
Real estate — mortgage		3,875,451			3,595,798
Total commercial		22,547,383			21,042,341
Retail:
Real estate — mortgage		3,211,625			2,881,880
Retail loans — credit card		291,149			276,269
Retail loans — other		494,591			500,757
Total retail		3,997,365			3,658,906
Total loans		26,544,748			24,701,247
Unearned income		(46,163	)		(46,695	)
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	26,498,585			24,654,552

Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Balance at beginning of year	$	314,459			289,612			265,745
Allowance for loan losses of acquired subsidiaries		—			9,915			—
Provision for losses on loans		170,208			75,148			82,532
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		14,155			12,590			8,561
Loans charged off		(131,209	)		(72,806	)		(67,226	)
Balance at end of year	$	367,613			314,459			289,612

At December 31, 2007, the recorded investment in loans that were considered to be impaired was $264.9 million. Included in this amount is $233.2 million of impaired loans

F-18

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

(which consist primarily of collateral dependent loans) for which there is no related allowance for loan losses determined in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” The allowance on these loans is zero because estimated losses on collateral dependent impaired loans included in this total have been charged-off. Impaired loans at December 31, 2007 also include $31.7 million of impaired loans for which the related allowance for loan losses is $6.4 million. At December 31, 2007, all impaired loans were on non-accrual status.

At December 31, 2006, the recorded investment in loans that were considered to be impaired was $42.2 million. Included in this amount was $1.7 million of impaired loans for which the related allowance for loan losses was $145 thousand, and $40.5 million of impaired loans (which consist primarily of collateral dependent loans) for which there was no related allowance for loan losses determined in accordance with SFAS No. 114.

The allowance for loan losses on impaired loans was determined using either the fair value of the loans’ collateral, less estimated selling costs, or discounted cash flows. The average recorded investment in impaired loans was approximately $148.1 million, $67.1 million, and $90.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. There was no interest income recognized for the investment in impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related amount of interest income recognized during the period that such loans were impaired was approximately $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Loans on nonaccrual status amount to $341.9 million, $96.2 million, and $80.0 million, at December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

A substantial portion of the loans are secured by real estate in markets in which subsidiary banks are located throughout Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina, and Florida. Accordingly, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the loan portfolio, and the recovery of a substantial portion of the carrying amount of real estate owned, are susceptible to changes in market conditions in these areas.

In the ordinary course of business, Synovus’ subsidiary banks have made loans to certain executive officers and directors (including their associates) of the Parent Company and its significant subsidiaries, as defined. Significant subsidiaries consist of Columbus Bank and Trust Company, Bank of North Georgia, and The National Bank of South Carolina. Management believes that such loans are made substantially on the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated customers. The following is a summary of such loans outstanding and the activity in these loans for the year ended December 31, 2007.

(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2006	$	298,409
Adjustment for executive officer and director changes		(3,377	)
Adjusted balance at December 31, 2006		295,032
New loans		321,594
Repayments		(303,110	)
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	313,516

Note 7   Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Other Assets

The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. There were no impairment losses for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

(In thousands)	Goodwill
Balance as of December 31, 2005	$	338,686
Goodwill acquired		177,271	(1)
Impairment losses		—
Other		(238	)(2)
Balance as of December 31, 2006		515,719
Goodwill acquired		3,419	(3)(4)
Impairment losses		—
Balance as of December 31, 2007	$	519,138

(1)	For the year ended December 31, 2006, $585 thousand pertains to contingent consideration relating to the GLOBALT acquisition. Additionally, goodwill acquired during 2006 includes $122.1 million resulting from the Riverside acquisition on March 25, 2006, and $54.6 million resulting from the First Florida acquisition on April 1, 2006. See Note 3 for additional information regarding these acquisitions.
(2)	During 2006, Synovus recorded a reduction in goodwill of $238 thousand associated with the dissolution of a bank owned leasing company.
(3)	During 2007, $1.9 million pertains to contingent consideration relating to the GLOBALT acquisition.
(4)	During the year ended December 31, 2007, Synovus finalized the purchase price allocation of the Riverside and First Florida acquisitions. This resulted in increases in goodwill of $1.3 million and $259 thousand for Riverside and First Florida, respectively.

F-19

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Other intangible assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented in the following table:

	2007							2006
	Gross							Gross
	Carrying		Accumulated					Carrying		Accumulated
(In thousands)	Amount		Amortization			Net		Amount		Amortization			Net
Other intangible assets:
Purchased trust revenues	$	4,210		(1,848	)		2,362		4,210		(1,567	)		2,643
Acquired customer contracts		5,270		(2,863	)		2,407		7,331		(2,585	)		4,746
Core deposit premiums		46,331		(23,663	)		22,668		46,331		(19,232	)		27,099
Other		666		(96	)		570		1,247		(42	)		1,205
Total carrying value	$	56,477		(28,470	)		28,007		59,119		(23,426	)		35,693

Aggregate other intangible assets amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $5.1 million, $5.8 million, and $5.3 million, respectively. Aggregate estimated amortization expense over the next five years is: $5.1 million in 2008, $4.7 million in 2009, $4.4 million in 2010, $4.1 million in 2011, and $3.4 million in 2012.

Other Assets

Significant balances included in other assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

(In thousands)	2007		2006
Accrued interest receivable	$	244,521		232,746
Accounts receivable		52,924		39,509
Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		361,737		204,027
Other real estate (ORE)		101,487		25,923
Private equity investments		58,039		38,853
Prepaid expenses		40,505		39,551
Net deferred income tax assets		117,172		111,407
Miscellaneous other assets		208,680		140,264
Total other assets	$	1,185,065		832,280

Note 8   Interest Bearing Deposits

A summary of interest bearing deposits at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

(In thousands)	2007		2006
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	3,362,572		3,228,350
Money market accounts		7,557,031		7,132,683
Savings accounts		442,824		499,962
Time deposits under $100,000		2,773,815		3,020,975
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		4,063,755		4,086,232
		18,199,997		17,968,202
Brokered time deposits*		3,287,396		3,014,495
Total interest bearing deposits	$	21,487,393		20,982,697

* Brokered time deposits are in amounts of $100,000 or more.

Interest bearing deposits include the unamortized balance of purchase accounting adjustments and the fair value basis adjustment for those time deposits which are hedged with interest rate swaps. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 on time deposits of $100,000 or more was $364.2 million, $299.7 million, and $171.7 million, respectively.

F-20

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

The following table presents scheduled cash maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2007:

(In thousands)
Maturing within one year	$	8,828,946
between 1 — 2 years		563,981
2 — 3 years		309,313
3 — 4 years		157,685
4 — 5 years		96,706
Thereafter		168,335
	$	10,124,966

Note 9   Long-Term Debt and Short-Term Borrowings

Long-term debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following:

(In thousands)	2007		2006
Parent Company:
4.875% subordinated notes, due February 15, 2013, with semi-annual interest payments and principal to be paid at maturity	$	300,000		300,000
5.125% subordinated notes, due June 15, 2017, with semi-annual interest payments and principal to be paid at maturity		450,000		450,000
LIBOR + 3.45% debentures, redeemed in 2007		—		10,180
LIBOR + 1.80% debentures, due April 19, 2035 with quarterly interest payments and principal to be paid at maturity (rate of 6.79% at December 31, 2007)		10,150		10,218
Hedge-related basis adjustment		11,533		887
Total long-term debt — Parent Company	$	771,683		771,285

Subsidiaries:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances with interest and principal payments due at various maturity dates through 2018 and interest rates ranging from 2.00% to 6.09% at December 31, 2007 (weighted average interest rate of 4.83% at December 31, 2007)	$	1,111,420	566,930
Other notes payable and capital leases with interest and principal payments due at various maturity dates through 2028 (weighted average interest rate of 4.32% at December 31, 2007)		7,132	5,143
Total long-term debt — subsidiaries		1,118,552	572,073
Total long-term debt	$	1,890,235	1,343,358

The provisions of the loan and security agreements associated with some of the promissory notes place certain restrictions, within specified limits, on payments of cash dividends, issuance of additional debt, creation of liens upon property, disposition of common stock or assets, and investments in subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2007, Synovus and its subsidiaries were in compliance with the covenants of the loan and security agreements.

The Federal Home Loan Bank advances are secured by certain loans receivable of approximately $2.4 billion, as well as investment securities of approximately $86.1 million at December 31, 2007.

Synovus has an unsecured line of credit with an unaffiliated bank for $25 million with an interest rate of 50 basis points above the short-term index, as defined. The line of credit requires an annual commitment fee of .125% on the average daily available balance and draws can be made on demand (subject to compliance with certain restrictive covenants). There were no advances outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

F-21

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Required annual principal payments on long-term debt for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2007 are shown on the following table:

	Parent
(In thousands)	Company		Subsidiaries		Total
2008	$	—		399,379		399,379
2009		—		392,464		392,464
2010		—		246,208		246,208
2011		—		33,394		33,394
2012		—		37,926		37,926

The following table sets forth certain information regarding federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, the principal components of short-term borrowings.

(In thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Balance at December 31	$	2,319,412			1,582,487			1,300,379
Weighted average interest rate at December 31		3.81	%		4.97	%		3.76	%
Maximum month end balance during the year	$	2,767,055			1,986,919			2,026,224
Average amount outstanding during the year		1,957,990			1,578,163			1,197,342
Weighted average interest rate during the year		4.75	%		4.62	%		2.87	%

Note 10   Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 are as follows:

	2007									2006							2005
	Before-			Tax			Net of			Before-		Tax			Net of		Before-			Tax		Net of
	Tax			(Expense)			Tax			Tax		(Expense)			Tax		Tax			(Expense)		Tax
(In thousands)	Amount			or Benefit			Amount			Amount		or Benefit			Amount		Amount			or Benefit		Amount
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges	$	29,859			(11,525	)		18,334			5,909		(2,259	)		3,650		(3,670	)		1,430		(2,240	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year		51,794			(19,940	)		31,854			19,456		(7,482	)		11,974		(45,639	)		17,568		(28,071	)
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in net income		(980	)		377			(603	)		2,118		(824	)		1,294		(463	)		180		(283	)
Net unrealized gains (losses)		50,814			(19,563	)		31,251			21,574		(8,306	)		13,268		(46,102	)		17,748		(28,354	)
Amortization of postretirement unfunded health benefit, net of tax		1,315			(498	)		817			—		—			—		—			—		—
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)		7,621			(1,470	)		6,151			16,688		(3,813	)		12,875		(12,161	)		4,316		(7,845	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	89,609			(33,056	)		56,553			44,171		(14,378	)		29,793		(61,933	)		23,494		(38,439	)

Cash settlements on cash flow hedges were $3.1 million, $2.5 million, and $7 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, all of which were included in earnings. During 2007, 2006, and 2005, Synovus recorded cash (payments) receipts on terminated hedges of ($1.3) million, $159 thousand, and ($6.2) million, respectively, which were deferred and are being amortized into earnings over the shorter of the remaining contract life or the maturity of the

F-22

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

designated instrument as an adjustment to interest income (expense). There were two terminated cash flow hedges during 2007. There was one terminated cash flow hedge during 2006, and two terminated cash flow hedges during 2005. The corresponding net amortization on these settlements was approximately ($816) thousand, ($389) thousand, and ($165) thousand in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The change in unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges was approximately $30.3 million in 2007, $5.6 million in 2006, and ($3.8) million in 2005.

Note 11   Earnings Per Share

The following table displays a reconciliation of the information used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.

							Income from
	Income from				Weighted		Continuing
	Continuing				Average		Operations		Net Income
(In thousands, except per share data)	Operations		Net Income		Shares		Per Share		Per Share
Basic:
2007	$	342,935	$	526,305		326,849	$	1.05	$	1.61
2006		415,103		616,917		321,241		1.29		1.92
2005		359,050		516,446		311,495		1.15		1.66
Diluted:
2007	$	342,935	$	526,305		329,863	$	1.04	$	1.60
2006		415,103		616,917		324,232		1.28		1.90
2005		359,050		516,446		314,815		1.14		1.64

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. The dilutive effect of outstanding options and restricted shares is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method.

The following represents potentially dilutive shares including options to purchase shares of Synovus common stock and non-vested shares that were outstanding during the periods noted below, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price and fair value of non-vested shares was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period.

			Weighted Average
	Number		Exercise Price
Quarter Ended	of Shares		Per Share
December 31, 2007		12,577,751	$	27.69	*
September 30, 2007		4,902,564	$	29.38
June 30, 2007		2,500	$	32.57
March 31, 2007		2,500	$	32.57
December 31, 2006		11,863	$	30.61
September 30, 2006		4,651,345	$	29.21
June 30, 2006		5,727,935	$	28.79
March 31, 2006		5,710,605	$	28.89
December 31, 2005		4,725,260	$	29.21
September 30, 2005		4,703,210	$	29.22
June 30, 2005		2,933,225	$	29.05
March 31, 2005		2,637,150	$	28.98

* See the summary of stock option activity table in Note 15 for the options outstanding adjustment to the weighted-average exercise price for all options outstanding at December 31, 2007.

Note 12   Derivative Instruments, Commitments and Contingencies

Derivative Instruments

As part of its overall interest rate risk management activities, Synovus utilizes derivative instruments to manage its exposure to various types of interest rate risk. These derivative instruments consist of interest rate swaps, commitments to sell

F-23

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

fixed-rate mortgage loans, and commitments to fund fixed-rate mortgage loans made to prospective mortgage loan customers. Mortgage rate lock commitments represent derivative instruments since it is intended that such loans will be sold.

Synovus originates first lien residential mortgage loans for sale into the secondary market and generally does not hold the originated loans for investment purposes. Mortgage loans are either converted to securities or are sold to a third party servicing aggregator.

At December 31, 2007, Synovus had commitments to fund fixed-rate mortgage loans to customers in the amount of $59.5 million. The fair value of these commitments at December 31, 2007 was an unrealized loss of $139 thousand, which was recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the consolidated statements of income.

At December 31, 2007, outstanding commitments to sell fixed-rate mortgage loans amounted to approximately $147.6 million. Such commitments are entered into to reduce the exposure to market risk arising from potential changes in interest rates, which could affect the fair value of mortgage loans held for sale and outstanding commitments to originate residential mortgage loans for resale.

The commitments to sell mortgage loans are at fixed prices and are scheduled to settle at specified dates that generally do not exceed 90 days. The fair value of outstanding commitments to sell mortgage loans at December 31, 2007 was an unrealized loss of $705 thousand, which was recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the consolidated statements of income.

Synovus utilizes interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risks, primarily arising from its core community banking activities. These interest rate swap transactions generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest rate payment obligations without the exchange of underlying principal amounts. Entering into interest rate derivatives potentially exposes Synovus to the risk of counterparties’ failure to fulfill their legal obligations including, but not limited to, potential amounts due or payable under each derivative contract. Notional principal amounts often are used to express the volume of these transactions, but the amounts potentially subject to credit risk are much smaller.

The receive fixed interest rate swap contracts at December 31, 2007 are being utilized to hedge $800 million in floating rate loans and $1.96 billion in fixed-rate liabilities. A summary of interest rate contracts and their terms at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is shown below. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, the fair value (net unrealized gains and losses) of these contracts has been recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.

			Weighted						Weighted							Net
			Average			Weighted			Average							Unrealized
	Notional		Receive			Average Pay			Maturity		Unrealized		Unrealized			Gains
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Rate			Rate*			In Months		Gains		Losses			(Losses)
December 31, 2007
Receive fixed swaps:
Fair value hedges	$	1,957,500		4.97	%		4.87	%		25	$	20,349		(2,268	)		18,081
Cash flow hedges		800,000		8.06	%		7.25	%		34		32,340		—			32,340
Total	$	2,757,500		5.87	%		5.56	%		28	$	52,689		(2,268	)		50,421
December 31, 2006
Receive fixed swaps:
Fair value hedges	$	2,082,500		4.91	%		5.11	%		31	$	32,686		(14,787	)		17,899
Cash flow hedges		700,000		7.91	%		8.25	%		38		4,265		(2,253	)		2,012
Total	$	2,782,500		5.66	%		5.90	%		32	$	36,951		(17,040	)		19,911
* Variable pay rate based upon contract rates in effect at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Synovus designates hedges of floating rate loans as cash flow hedges. These swaps hedge against the variability of cash flows from specified pools of floating rate prime based loans. Synovus calculates effectiveness of the hedging relationship quarterly using regression analysis for all cash flow hedges entered into after March 31, 2007. The cumulative dollar offset method is used for all hedges entered into prior to that date. As of December 31, 2007, cumulative ineffectiveness for Synovus’ portfolio of cash flow hedges represented a gain of approximately $40 thousand. Ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges is recognized in the consolidated statements of income as other operating income.

F-24

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Synovus expects to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income approximately $7.3 million as net-of-tax income during the next twelve months, as the related payments for interest rate swaps and amortization of deferred gains(losses) are recorded.

During 2007 and 2006, Synovus terminated certain cash flow hedges which resulted in a net pre-tax loss of $1.3 million and a net pre-tax gain of $159 thousand, respectively. These gains (losses) have been included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and are being amortized over the shorter of the remaining contract life or the maturity of the designated instrument as an adjustment to interest income (expense). The remaining unamortized deferred loss balances at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $4.4 million and $4.0 million, respectively.

Synovus designates hedges of fixed rate liabilities as fair value hedges. These swaps hedge against the change in fair market value of various fixed rate liabilities due to changes in the benchmark interest rate LIBOR. Synovus calculates effectiveness of the hedging relationships quarterly using regression analysis for all fair value hedges entered into after March 31, 2007. The cumulative dollar offset method is used for all hedges entered into prior to that date, except for those hedges entered into prior to March 31, 2007 which have been redesignated and now use regression analysis. As of December 31, 2007, cumulative ineffectiveness for Synovus’ portfolio of fair value hedges represented a gain of approximately $399 thousand. Ineffectiveness from fair value hedges is recognized in the consolidated statements of income as other operating income.

Synovus also enters into derivative financial instruments to meet the financing and interest rate risk management needs of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, Synovus enters into offsetting positions in order to minimize the risk to Synovus. These derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the notional amount of customer related derivative financial instruments, including both the customer position and the offsetting position, was $2.96 billion and $2.05 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2007, Synovus had derivative positions for customer interest rate risk management needs with unrealized gains of $51.4 million and unrealized losses of $52.3 million for a net unrealized loss of $912 thousand.

Synovus also enters into derivative financial instruments to meet the equity risk management needs of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, Synovus enters into offsetting positions in order to minimize the risk to Synovus. These derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings. The notional amount of customer related equity derivative financial instruments, including both the customer position and the offsetting position, was $10.7 million and $19.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2007, Synovus had derivative positions for customer equity risk management needs with unrealized gains of $8.0 million which were fully offset by unrealized losses of $8.0 million.

Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit

Synovus is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

The carrying amount of loan commitments and letters of credit closely approximates the fair value of such financial instruments. Carrying amounts include unamortized fee income and, in some instances, allowances for any estimated credit losses from these financial instruments. These amounts are not material to Synovus’ consolidated balance sheets.

As of December 31, 2007, Synovus had standby and commercial letters of credit in the amount of $2.20 billion. The standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Synovus to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The approximate terms of these commitments range from one to five years. Collateral is required to support letters of credit in accordance with management’s evaluation of the creditworthiness of each customer.

The exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, and standby and commercial letters of credit, is represented by the contract amount of those instruments. Synovus uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

F-25

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Loan commitments and letters of credit at December 31, 2007 include the following:

(In thousands)
Standby and commercial letters of credit	$	2,208,517
Commitments to fund commercial real estate, construction, and land development loans		1,978,570
Unused credit card lines		1,453,115
Commitments under home equity lines of credit		1,066,752
Other loan commitments		4,082,629
Total	$	10,789,583

Lease Commitments

Synovus and its subsidiaries have entered into long-term operating leases for various facilities and equipment. Management expects that as these leases expire they will be renewed or replaced by similar leases based on need.

At December 31, 2007, minimum rental commitments under all such non-cancelable leases for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

(In thousands)
2008	$	18,450
2009		17,120
2010		16,189
2011		15,470
2012		15,170
Thereafter		116,395
Total	$	198,794

Rental expense on facilities was $24.5 million, $19.6 million, and $17.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

Visa Litigation

Synovus is a member of the Visa USA network. Under Visa USA bylaws, Visa members are obligated to indemnify Visa USA and/or its parent company, Visa, Inc., for potential future settlement of, or judgments resulting from, certain litigation, which Visa refers to as the “covered litigation.” Synovus’ indemnification obligation is limited to its membership proportion of Visa USA. On November 7, 2007, Visa announced the settlement of its American Express litigation, and disclosed in its annual report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 that Visa had accrued a contingent liability for the estimated settlement of its Discover litigation. Accordingly, during 2007, Synovus has recognized a contingent liability in the amount of $36.8 million as an estimate for its membership proportion of the American Express settlement and the potential Discover settlement, as well as its membership proportion of the amount that Synovus estimates will be required for Visa to settle the remaining covered litigation. The timing for ultimate settlement of all covered litigation is not determinable at this time.

Legal Proceedings

Synovus and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the ordinary course of business, Synovus and its subsidiaries are also subject to regulatory examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries and investigations. Synovus establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that Synovus determines to be both probable and reasonably estimable. In the pending regulatory matter described below, loss contingencies are not reasonably estimable in the view of management, and, accordingly, a reserve has not been established for this matter. Based on current knowledge, advice of counsel and available insurance coverage, management does not believe that the eventual outcome of pending litigation and/or regulatory matters, including the pending regulatory matter described below, will have a material adverse effect on Synovus’ consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to Synovus’ results of operations for any particular period.

The FDIC is currently conducting an investigation of the policies, practices and procedures used by Columbus Bank and Trust Company (CB&T), a wholly owned banking subsidiary of Synovus, in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to its Affinity Agreement with CompuCredit Corporation (CompuCredit). CB&T issues credit cards that are marketed and serviced by CompuCredit pursuant to the Affinity Agreement. A provision of the Affinity Agreement generally requires CompuCredit to indemnify CB&T for losses incurred as a result of the failure of credit card programs offered pursuant to the Agreement to comply with applicable law. Synovus is subject to a per event 10% share of any such loss, but Synovus’ 10% payment obligation is limited to a cumulative total of $2 million for all losses incurred.

CB&T is cooperating with the FDIC’s investigation. Synovus cannot predict the eventual outcome of the FDIC’s investigation; however, the investigation has resulted in material changes to CB&T’s policies, practices and procedures in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to the

F-26

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Affinity Agreement. It is likely that the investigation may result in further changes to CB&T’s policies, practices and procedures in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to the Affinity Agreement and the imposition of one or more regulatory sanctions, including a civil money penalty and/or restitution of certain fees to affected cardholders. At this time, management of Synovus does not expect the ultimate resolution of the investigation to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows primarily due to the expected performance by CompuCredit of its indemnification obligations described in the paragraph above.

Note 13   Regulatory Requirements and Restrictions

The amount of dividends paid to the Parent Company from each of the subsidiary banks is limited by various banking regulatory agencies. The amount of cash dividends available from subsidiary banks for payment in 2008, in the aggregate, without prior approval from the banking regulatory agencies, is approximately $407 million. In prior years, certain Synovus banks have received permission and have paid cash dividends to the Parent Company in excess of these regulatory limitations.

Synovus is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Synovus must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Synovus on a consolidated basis, and the Parent Company and subsidiary banks individually, to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets as defined, and of Tier I capital to average assets, as defined. Management believes that as of December 31, 2007, Synovus meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2007, the most recent notification from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta categorized all of the subsidiary banks as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Synovus and its subsidiaries must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table shown below on the following page. Management is not currently aware of the existence of any conditions or events occurring subsequent to December 31, 2007 which would affect the well-capitalized classification.

F-27

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

The following table summarizes regulatory capital information at December 31, 2007 and 2006 on a consolidated basis and for each significant subsidiary, defined as any direct subsidiary of the Company with assets or net income exceeding 10% of the consolidated totals.

										To be Well
										Capitalized Under
						For Capital Adequacy				Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Purposes				Action Provisions
(Dollars in thousands)	2007			2006		2007		2006		2007		2006
Synovus Financial Corp.
Tier I capital	$	2,870,558			3,254,603		1,260,201		1,197,211		n/a		n/a
Total risk-based capital		3,988,171			4,319,062		2,520,403		2,394,423		n/a		n/a
Tier I capital ratio		9.11	%		10.87		4.00		4.00		n/a		n/a
Total risk-based capital ratio		12.66			14.43		8.00		8.00		n/a		n/a
Leverage ratio		8.65			10.64		4.00		4.00		n/a		n/a
Columbus Bank and Trust Company
Tier I capital	$	864,588			1,405,072		208,864		230,533		313,295		345,830
Total risk-based capital		912,800			1,440,232		417,727		461,106		522,159		576,383
Tier I capital ratio		16.56	%		24.38		4.00		4.00		6.00		6.00
Total risk-based capital ratio		17.48			24.99		8.00		8.00		10.00		10.00
Leverage ratio		11.97			24.56		4.00		4.00		5.00		5.00
Bank of North Georgia
Tier I capital	$	453,127			380,545		202,754		160,556		304,132		240,834
Total risk-based capital		514,948			424,567		405,509		321,112		506,886		401,390
Tier I capital ratio		8.94	%		9.48		4.00		4.00		6.00		6.00
Total risk-based capital ratio		10.16			10.58		8.00		8.00		10.00		10.00
Leverage ratio		9.17			9.74		4.00		4.00		5.00		5.00
The National Bank of South Carolina
Tier I capital	$	434,179			360,985		180,598		152,762		270,897		229,143
Total risk-based capital		477,196			399,398		361,196		305,524		451,495		381,905
Tier I capital ratio		9.62	%		9.45		4.00		4.00		6.00		6.00
Total risk-based capital ratio		10.57			10.46		8.00		8.00		10.00		10.00
Leverage ratio		9.39			8.77		4.00		4.00		5.00		5.00
n/a - The prompt corrective action provisions are applicable at the bank level only

Note 14   Employment Expenses and Benefit Plans

Synovus generally provides noncontributory money purchase and profit sharing plans, and 401(k) plans, which cover all eligible employees. Annual discretionary contributions to these plans are set each year by the respective Boards of Directors of each subsidiary, but cannot exceed amounts allowable as a deduction for federal income tax purposes. Synovus made aggregate contributions to these money purchase, profit sharing, and 401(k) plans, recorded as expense, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 of approximately $19.5 million, $43.1 million, and $35.9 million, respectively.

Synovus has stock purchase plans for directors and employees whereby Synovus makes contributions equal to one-half of employee and director voluntary contributions. The funds are used to purchase outstanding shares of Synovus common stock. Synovus recorded as expense $7.3 million, $6.7 million, and $6.1 million for contributions to these plans in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

Synovus has entered into employment agreements with certain executives for past and future services which provide for current compensation in addition to salary in the form of deferred compensation payable at retirement or in the event of death, total disability, or termination of employment. The

F-28

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

aggregate cost of these salary continuation plans and employment agreements is not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Synovus provides certain medical benefits to qualified retirees through a postretirement medical benefits plan. The benefit expense and accrued benefit cost is not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Note 15   Share-Based Compensation

General Description of Share-Based Compensation Plans

Synovus has various long-term incentive plans under which the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the authority to grant share-based compensation to Synovus employees. At December 31, 2007, Synovus had a total of 22,985,002 shares of its authorized but unissued common stock reserved for future grants under the 2007 Omnibus Plan. The general terms of each of these plans are substantially the same, permitting the grant of share-based compensation including stock options, non-vested shares, and stock appreciation rights. These plans generally include vesting periods ranging from two to three years and contractual terms ranging from five to ten years. Stock options are granted at exercise prices which equal the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant-date. Synovus historically issues new shares to satisfy share option exercises.

Stock options granted in 2007 and 2006 generally become exercisable over a three-year period, with one-third of the total grant amount vesting on each anniversary of the grant-date, and expire ten years from the date of grant. Vesting for stock options granted during 2007 and 2006 accelerates upon retirement for plan participants who have reached age 62 and who also have no less than fifteen years of service at the date of their election to retire. For stock options granted after adoption of SFAS No. 123R, share-based compensation expense is recognized for plan participants on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the vesting period or the period until reaching retirement eligibility.

Stock options granted prior to 2006 generally become exercisable at the end of a two to three-year vesting period and expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. Vesting for stock options granted prior to 2006 accelerates upon retirement for plan participants who have reached age 50 and who also have no less than fifteen years of service at the date of their election to retire. Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123R, share-based compensation expense was determined in Synovus’ pro forma disclosure over the nominal vesting period without consideration for retirement eligibility. Following adoption of SFAS No. 123R, share-based compensation expense for all new awards is recognized in income over the shorter of the vesting period or the period until reaching retirement eligibility.

Non-vested shares granted in 2007, 2006 and 2005 generally vest over a three-year period, with one-third of the total grant amount vesting on each anniversary of the grant-date. Share-based compensation expense is recognized for plan participants on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

Impact of TSYS Spin-Off

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Synovus completed the tax-free spin-off of its shares of TSYS common stock to Synovus shareholders on December 31, 2007. Synovus’ share-based plans covering the majority of outstanding stock options on December 31, 2007 contained mandatory antidilution provisions designed to equalize the fair value of an award in an equity restructuring. Approximately 216 thousand of outstanding Synovus stock options were issued under plans of acquired banks which did not contain mandatory antidilution provisions. These options were fully vested. Thus, as a result of the spin-off transaction, all outstanding Synovus stock options were modified as described below. Additionally, all holders of non-vested shares received TSYS shares based on the distribution ratio applicable to all Synovus shares in connection with the spin-off, which are subject to the same vesting period as their non-vested Synovus shares.

Outstanding Synovus stock options held by TSYS employees on December 31, 2007 were converted to TSYS stock options utilizing an adjustment ratio of the post-spin stock price (TSYS 10-day volume-weighted average post-spin stock price) to the pre-spin stock price (Synovus closing stock price immediately pre-spin).

The pre-spin and the post spin fair value of Synovus’ stock options was measured using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. Outstanding options were grouped and separately measured based on their remaining estimated life. The risk-free interest rate and expected stock price volatility assumptions were matched to the remaining estimated life of the options. The expected volatility for the pre-spin calculation was based on Synovus’ historical stock price volatility, and for the post-spin calculation, was determined using implied volatility which was based on historical volatility of peer companies. The dividend yield included in the pre-spin calculation was 3.4% while the dividend yield assumption in the post-spin calculation was 6.3%.

As a result of this modification, TSYS recognized in 2007 an expense of $5.5 million for outstanding vested options. This expense is included as a component of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of income, net of minority interest. Outstanding Synovus stock options held by Synovus employees were converted to equalize their fair value utilizing an adjustment ratio of the post-spin stock price (Synovus 10-day volume-weighted average post-spin stock price) to

F-29

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

the pre-spin stock price (Synovus closing stock price immediately pre-spin). As a result of this modification, Synovus recognized in 2007 an expense of $2.0 million, principally due to the modification of the outstanding Synovus stock options which were issued under plans of acquired banks that did not contain mandatory antidilutive provisions. This expense is included as a component of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. The changes that resulted from the aforementioned conversion of stock options due to the spin-off of TSYS are reflected in Synovus’ outstanding options as of December 31, 2007 in the tables that follow.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

Synovus’ share-based compensation costs are recorded as a component of salaries and other personnel expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Total share-based compensation expense for continuing operations was $15.9 million, $18.0 million and $862 thousand for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for share-based compensation arrangements was $5.6 million, $6.4 million and $312 thousand for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

No share-based compensation costs have been capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Aggregate compensation expense recognized in 2007 and 2006 with respect to Synovus stock options included $2.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively, that would have been recognized in previous years had the policy under SFAS No. 123R with respect to retirement eligibility been applied to awards granted prior to January 1, 2006.

As of December 31, 2007, there was total unrecognized compensation cost of approximately $24.1 million related to the unvested portion of share-based compensation arrangements involving shares of Synovus stock.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, Synovus elected to calculate compensation cost for purposes of pro forma disclosure assuming that all options would vest and reverse any recognized compensation costs for forfeited awards when the awards were actually forfeited. SFAS No. 123R requires that compensation cost be recognized net of estimated forfeitures. The estimate of forfeitures is adjusted as actual forfeitures differ from estimates, resulting in compensation cost only for those awards that actually vest. The effect of the change in estimated forfeitures is recognized as compensation cost in the period of the change in estimate. In estimating the forfeiture rate, Synovus stratified its grantees and used historical experience to determine separate forfeiture rates for the different award grants. Currently, Synovus estimates forfeiture rates for its grantees in the range of 0% to 10%.

Stock Option Awards

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted to key Synovus employees during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $7.22, $6.40 and $7.06, respectively. The fair value of the option grants was determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007	2006	2005
Risk-free interest rate	4.8%	4.5	4.1
Expected stock price volatility	21.7	24.9	21.4
Dividend yield	2.6	2.8	2.4
Expected life of options	6.0 years	5.8 years	8.5 years

The expected volatility for stock option awards in 2007 and 2006 was determined with equal weighting of implied volatility and historical volatility, and for awards prior to 2006, was determined using implied volatility. The expected life for stock options granted during 2007 and 2006 was calculated using the “simplified” method, as prescribed by the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The expected life for stock options granted prior to 2006 was determined from historical experience.

F-30

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

A summary of stock option activity (including performance-accelerated stock options as described below) and changes during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 is presented below:

	2007						2006					2005
				Weighted-						Weighted-					Weighted-
				Average						Average					Average
				Exercise						Exercise					Exercise
Stock Options	Shares			Price			Shares			Price		Shares			Price
Outstanding at beginning of year		23,639,261		$	22.83			25,546,776		$	22.66		25,769,908		$	21.51
Options granted		246,660			31.93			868,966			27.66		2,575,053			29.02
Options assumed in connection with acquisitions		—			—			877,915			8.36		—			—
Options exercised		(4,362,785	)		18.74			(3,418,550	)		18.89		(2,551,310	)		17.34
Options forfeited		(471,600	)		19.34			(173,050	)		27.49		(209,842	)		24.05
Options expired		(68,079	)		19.19			(62,796	)		21.01		(37,033	)		22.84
Options converted to TSYS options on December 31, 2007 due to TSYS spin-off		(5,437,719	)		27.32			—			—		—			—
Options outstanding and price adjustment due to TSYS spin-off on December 31, 2007		15,453,864			(12.06	)		—			—		—			—
Options outstanding at end of year		28,999,602		$	10.58			23,639,261		$	22.83		25,546,776		$	22.66
Options exercisable at end of year		25,148,449		$	10.10			14,179,889		$	21.21		12,415,332		$	21.75

The following table summarizes information about Synovus’ stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2007.

	As of December 31, 2007
	Options			Options
	Outstanding			Exercisable
Weighted-average remaining contractual life		4.92 years			4.36 years
Aggregate intrinsic value	$	(3,195,905	)	$	9,360,235

The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $44.6 million, $31.8 million and $27.8 million, respectively. The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during 2007 and 2006 was $33.5 million and $27.8 million, respectively. At December 31, 2007, there was approximately $2.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining period of 1.11 years.

Synovus granted performance-accelerated stock options to certain key executives in 2000 that fully vested during 2007. The exercise price per share was equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. The grant-date fair value was amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years with the portion related to periods prior to 2006 having previously been included in pro forma disclosures and the portion related to periods from January 1, 2006 through the vesting date in 2007 being recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Summary information regarding these performance-accelerated stock options including adjustments resulting from the December 31, 2007 spin-off of TSYS is presented below. There were no performance-accelerated stock options granted during 2007, 2006, or 2005.

					Options
Year	Number		Exercise		Outstanding at
Options	of Stock		Price		December 31,
Granted	Options		Per Share		2007
2000		8,777,563	$	8.27-8.44		7,921,214

Non-Vested Shares

In addition to the stock options described above, non-transferable, non-vested shares of Synovus common stock have been awarded to certain key Synovus employees and non-employee directors of Synovus. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of non-vested shares granted during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $28.37, $27.19 and $27.28, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during 2007 and 2006 was $5.9 million and $235 thousand, respectively. Except for the grant of

F-31

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

63,386 performance-vesting shares described below, the market value of the common stock at the date of issuance is amortized as compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the awards. Dividends are paid on these non-vested shares during the holding period. These non-vested shares are entitled to voting rights.

A summary of non-vested shares outstanding (excluding the 63,386 performance-vesting shares as described below) and changes during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 is presented below:

				Weighted-
				Average
				Grant-Date
Non-Vested Shares	Shares			Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2005		—		$	—
Granted		82,583			27.28
Vested		—			—
Forfeited		—			—
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		82,583			27.28
Granted		616,495			27.19
Vested		(8,520	)		27.62
Forfeited		(6,004	)		27.13
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		684,554			27.19
Granted		574,601			28.37
Vested		(215,666	)		27.32
Forfeited		(20,946	)		27.23
Outstanding at December 31, 2007		1,022,543		$	27.83

As of December 31, 2007, there was approximately $21.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the foregoing non-vested share based compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining period of 1.62 years.

During 2005, Synovus authorized a total grant of 63,386 shares of non-vested stock to a key executive with a performance-vesting schedule (performance-vesting shares). These performance-vesting shares have seven one-year performance periods (2005-2011) during each of which the Compensation Committee establishes an earnings per share goal and, if such goal is attained during any performance period, 20% of the performance-vesting shares will vest. Compensation expense for each tranche of this grant is measured based on the quoted market value of Synovus’ stock as of the date that each period’s earnings per share goal is determined and is recorded as a charge to expense on a straight-line basis during each year in which the performance criteria is be met. The total fair value of performance-vesting shares vested during 2007 and 2006 was $351 thousand and $340 thousand, respectively.

The following is a summary of performance-vesting shares outstanding at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:

				Weighted-
				Average
				Grant-Date
Performance-Vesting Shares	Shares			Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2005		—		$	—
Granted		12,677			26.82
Vested		—			—
Forfeited		—			—
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		12,677			26.82
Granted		12,677			27.72
Vested		(12,677	)		26.82
Forfeited		—			—
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		12,677			27.72
Granted		—			—
Vested		(12,677	)		27.72
Forfeited		—			—
Outstanding at December 31, 2007		—		$	—

At December 31, 2007, there remained 38,032 performance-vesting shares to be granted between 2008 and 2011.

Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements of Synovus common stock for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $63.8 million, $65.5 million, and $43.1 million, respectively.

As stock options for the purchase of Synovus common stock are exercised and non-vested shares vest, Synovus recognizes a tax benefit which is recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital within shareholders’ equity for tax benefits not recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Synovus recognized such tax benefits in the amount of $15.9 million, $11.4 million and $9.5 million for the years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

Synovus elected to adopt the alternative method of calculating the beginning pool of excess tax benefits as permitted by FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. SFAS 123R-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.” This is a simplified method to determine the pool of excess tax benefits that is used in determining the tax effects of share-based compensation in the Consolidated Statements of Income and cash flow reporting for awards that were outstanding as of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.

F-32

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Pro forma

Had Synovus determined compensation expense based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock option grants under SFAS No. 123, income from continuing operations and net income would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated in the following table for 2005. Due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R in 2006, such pro forma information is not applicable for years subsequent to 2005.

	For The Year Ended
	December 31, 2005
	Income
	from
	Continuing			Net
	Operations			Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
Income from continuing operations/net income, as reported	$	359,050			516,446
Add: Share-based employee compensation expense recognized, net of tax		517			1,117
Deduct: Total share-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of related tax effects		(9,425	)		(15,167	)
Pro forma	$	350,142			502,396
Earnings per share:
Basic-as reported	$	1.15			1.66
Basic-pro forma		1.12			1.61
Diluted-as reported		1.14			1.64
Diluted-pro forma		1.11			1.60

The following table provides aggregate information regarding grants under all Synovus equity compensation plans through December 31, 2007.

						(c)
	(a)			(b)		Number of shares
	Number of securities			Weighted-average		remaining available for
	to be issued			exercise price of		issuance excluding
	upon exercise of			outstanding		shares reflected
Plan Category(1)	outstanding options			options		in column (a)
Shareholder approved equity compensation plans for shares of Synovus stock		28,065,124	(2)	$	10.77		22,985,002	(3)
Non-shareholder approved equity compensation plans		—			—		—
Total		28,065,124		$	10.77		22,985,002

(1)	Does not include information for equity compensation plans assumed by Synovus in mergers. A total of 934,478 shares of common stock were issuable upon exercise of options granted under plans assumed in mergers and outstanding at December 31, 2007. The weighted average exercise price of all options granted under plans assumed in mergers and outstanding at December 31, 2007 was $5.00. Synovus cannot grant additional awards under these assumed plans.
(2)	Does not include an aggregate number of 1,022,543 shares of non-vested stock which will vest over the remaining years through 2011.
(3)	Includes 22,985,002 shares available for future grants as share awards under the 2007 Omnibus Plan.

F-33

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Note 16   Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying and estimated fair values of on-balance sheet financial instruments at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The estimated fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties.

The carrying and estimated fair values relating to derivative instruments and off-balance sheet financial instruments are discussed in Note 12.

The fair value of derivative instruments, consisting of interest rate contracts, is equal to the estimated net amount that Synovus would receive or pay to terminate the interest rate swap contracts at the reporting date, and is determined based on statements from the counterparties, taking into account current interest rates and the credit-worthiness of the counterparties. The fair value of derivative instruments consisting of commitments to fund and sell fixed-rate mortgage loans is determined based on quoted market prices.

Cash and due from banks, interest earning deposits with banks, and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements are repriced on a short-term basis; as such, the carrying value closely approximates fair value.

The fair values of trading account assets and available for sale investment securities is determined based on quoted market prices. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is based on quoted prices from secondary market investors.

The fair value of loans is estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type, such as commercial, mortgage, home equity, credit card, and other consumer loans. Commercial loans are further segmented into certain collateral code groupings. The fair value of the loan portfolio is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows using estimated market discount rates which reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan.

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand accounts, interest bearing demand deposits, money market accounts, and savings accounts, is estimated to be equal to the amount payable on demand as of that respective date. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Short-term debt that matures within ten days is assumed to be at fair value. The fair value of other short-term and long-term debt with fixed interest rates is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows using estimated market discount rates.

	2007				2006
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
(In thousands)	Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	682,583		682,583		713,053		713,053
Interest earning deposits with banks		10,950		10,950		19,315		19,315
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		76,086		76,086		101,091		101,091
Trading account assets		17,803		17,803		15,266		15,266
Mortgage loans held for sale		153,437		153,471		175,042		175,277
Investment securities available for sale		3,666,974		3,666,974		3,352,357		3,352,357
Loans, net		26,130,972		26,143,015		24,340,093		24,315,920
Derivative asset positions		112,160		112,160		67,652		67,652
Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits		3,472,423		3,472,423		3,545,766		3,545,766
Interest bearing deposits		21,487,393		21,502,929		20,982,697		20,948,689
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		2,319,412		2,319,412		1,582,487		1,582,487
Long-term debt		1,890,235		1,844,505		1,343,358		1,321,114
Derivative liability positions		62,650		62,650		48,270		48,270

F-34

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Note 17   Income Taxes

The aggregate amount of income taxes included in the consolidated statements of income and in the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, is presented below:

(Dollars in thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Consolidated Statements of Income:
Income taxes related to continuing operations	$	184,739			230,435			204,290
Income taxes related to discontinued operations		145,224			126,181			103,286
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity:
Income taxes related to:
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		230			—			—
Postretirement unfunded health benefit obligation		498			(1,966	)		—
SAB No. 108 adjustment		—			14,544			—
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale		19,563			8,306			(17,748	)
Unrealized gain (losses) on cash flow hedges		11,525			2,259			(1,430	)
Gains and losses on foreign currency translation		1,470			3,813			(4,316	)
Share-based compensation		(15,937	)		(11,390	)		(9,505	)
Total	$	347,312		$	372,182			274,577

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, income tax expense (benefit) consists of:

(In thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Current:
Federal	$	203,129			234,366			192,691
State		14,955			22,767			25,517
		218,084			257,133			218,208
Deferred:
Federal		(29,272	)		(27,294	)		(10,656	)
State		(4,073	)		596			(3,262	)
		(33,345	)		(26,698	)		(13,918	)
Total income tax expense	$	184,739			230,435			204,290

Income tax expense as shown in the consolidated statements of income differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate of 35% to income from continuing operations before income taxes as a result of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Taxes at statutory federal income tax rate	$	184,685			225,938			197,169
Tax-exempt income		(3,249	)		(3,964	)		(3,745	)
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit		7,073			15,186			14,466
Tax credits		(2,643	)		(4,020	)		(1,261	)
Other, net		(1,127	)		(2,705	)		(2,339	)
Total income tax expense	$	184,739			230,435			204,290
Effective income tax rate		35.01	%		35.70			36.26

F-35

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred income tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented below:

(In thousands)	2007			2006
Deferred income tax assets:
Provision for losses on loans	$	140,862			120,695
Finance lease transactions		18,991			12,484
Deferred revenue		6,603			7,901
Deferred compensation		10,953			9,326
Share-based compensation		7,258			6,903
Provision for postretirement benefits under SFAS No. 158		1,186			1,530
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments		3,930			3,941
Visa litigation expense		14,056			—
Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges		—			1,698
Net unrealized loss on investment securities available for sale		—			9,525
Other		13,511			10,772
Total deferred income tax assets		217,350			184,775
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Excess tax over financial statement depreciation		(56,632	)		(48,251	)
Purchase accounting adjustments		(11,285	)		(14,036	)
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges		(9,827	)		—
Net unrealized gain on investment securities available for sale		(10,039	)		—
Ownership interest in partnership		(6,939	)		(5,010	)
Other		(5,456	)		(6,071	)
Total gross deferred income tax liabilities		(100,178	)		(73,368	)
Net deferred income tax assets	$	117,172			111,407

Synovus has determined that a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets is not necessary as of December 31, 2007. Synovus files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions, and is subject to examinations by these taxing authorities unless statutory examination periods lapse. Synovus’ U.S. Federal income tax return is filed on a consolidated basis, and for all periods presented, includes the formerly majority owned subsidiary, TSYS. Most state income tax returns are filed on a separate entity basis. Synovus is no longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for years before 2004 and with few exceptions, Synovus is no longer subject to income tax examinations from state and local tax authorities for years before 2001. There is currently no Federal tax examination in progress. However, certain tax examinations are in progress by the relevant state tax authorities. Although Synovus is unable to determine the ultimate outcome of these examinations, Synovus believes that its liability for uncertain tax positions relating to these jurisdictions for such years is adequate.

Synovus adopted the provisions of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” as of January 1, 2007. FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 provides a two-step process in the evaluation of a tax position. The first step is recognition. A company determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including a resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based upon the technical merits of the position. The second step is measurement. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

F-36

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Upon adoption as of January 1, 2007, Synovus recognized a $1.4 million decrease in the liability for uncertain tax positions, of continuing operations, with a corresponding increase in retained earnings of $1.4 million as a cumulative effect adjustment. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, Synovus decreased its liability for prior year uncertain income tax positions as a discrete item by a net amount of approximately $4.1 million (net of the Federal tax effect) including $1.4 million in interest and penalties. This decrease resulted from the completion of a routine state tax examination, expiring state audit period statutes and other new information impacting the potential resolution of material uncertain tax positions.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows⁽¹⁾:

(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2006	$	9,057
Current activity:
Additions based on tax positions related to current year		2,193
Additions for tax positions of prior years		—
Deductions for tax positions of prior years		(4,176	)
Settlements		—
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	7,074

(1) Unrecognized state tax benefits are not adjusted for the Federal tax impact.

Synovus recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits totaled $1.9 million and $1.1 million as of January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $7.2 million and $5.4 million (net of the Federal benefit on state tax issues) respectively, which includes interest and penalties of $1.3 million and $0.7 million.

The total liability for uncertain tax positions under FIN 48 at December 31, 2007 is $5.4 million. Synovus is not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time; however, at this time, Synovus does not expect a significant payment related to these obligations within the next year. Synovus expects that approximately $36 thousand of uncertain tax positions will be either settled or resolved during the next twelve months.

F-37

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Note 18   Condensed Financial Information of Synovus Financial Corp. (Parent Company only)

Condensed Balance Sheets

	December 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006
Assets
Cash	$	2,157			3,294
Investment in consolidated bank subsidiaries, at equity		3,873,821			4,189,420
Investment in consolidated nonbank subsidiaries, at equity		60,447			57,541
Notes receivable from bank subsidiaries		140,532			167,439
Notes receivable from nonbank subsidiaries		2,382			3,773
Other assets		258,288			165,377
Total assets	$	4,337,627			4,586,844
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	771,683			771,285
Other liabilities		124,354			106,909
Total liabilities		896,037			878,194
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock		335,529			331,214
Additional paid-in capital		1,101,209			1,033,055
Treasury stock		(113,944	)		(113,944	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		31,439			(2,129	)
Retained earnings		2,087,357			2,460,454
Total shareholders’ equity		3,441,590			3,708,650
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	4,337,627			4,586,844

F-38

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Condensed Statements of Income

	Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Income:
Cash dividends received from bank subsidiaries	$	365,024			245,687			251,202
Management and information technology fees from affiliates		117,934			107,133			85,092
Securities gains, net		—			—			166
Interest income		6,693			5,503			3,698
Other income		42,347			29,996			17,332
Total income		531,998			388,319			357,490
Expenses:
Interest expense		41,224			41,343			41,560
Other expenses		250,944			218,803			166,856
Total expenses		292,168			260,146			208,416
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries		239,830			128,173			149,074
Allocated income tax benefit		(50,854	)		(45,260	)		(38,471	)
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries		290,684			173,433			187,545
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries		52,251			241,670			171,505
Income from continuing operations		342,935			415,103			359,050
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest		183,370			201,814			157,396
Net income	$	526,305			616,917			516,446

F-39

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

	Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Operating Activities
Net income	$	526,305			616,917			516,446
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		(244,150	)		(443,484	)		(328,901	)
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion, net		20,063			22,235			17,243
Share-based compensation		21,540			9,889			862
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities		18,034			43,158			(3,029	)
Net (increase) decrease in other assets		(100,708	)		(37,106	)		7,302
Gain on sale of other assets		—			(1,940	)		—
Other, net		47,690			9,416			(1,370	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		288,774			219,085			208,553
Investing Activities
Net investment in subsidiaries		(71,963	)		(33,757	)		(85,887	)
Equity method investments		(12,186	)		—			(10	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(22,670	)		(26,941	)		(17,503	)
Proceeds from sale of other assets		—			2,135			—
Net decrease (increase) in short-term notes receivable
from bank subsidiaries		26,907			30,238			(170,399	)
Net decrease (increase) in short-term notes receivable from non-bank subsidiaries		1,391			241			(2,384	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(78,521	)		(28,084	)		(276,183	)
Financing Activities
Dividends paid to shareholders		(264,930	)		(244,654	)		(224,303	)
Principal repayments on long-term debt		(10,310	)		(10,310	)		(200,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			—			445,644
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		63,850			65,510			43,125
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(211,390	)		(189,454	)		64,466
(Decrease) increase in cash		(1,137	)		1,547			(3,164	)
Cash at beginning of year		3,294			1,747			4,911
Cash at end of year	$	2,157			3,294			1,747

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, the Parent Company paid income taxes (net of refunds received) of $429.8 million, $380.9 million, and $315.0 million, and interest in the amount of $41.5 million, $41.7 million, and $41.3 million, respectively.

F-40

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ­ ­ 

Note 19   Supplemental Financial Data

Components of other operating income and other operating expenses in excess of 1% of total revenues for any of the respective years are as follows:

	Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2007		2006		2005
Income:
Income from private equity investments	$	15,457		5,341		2,242
Expenses:
Third-party processing expenses		38,639		35,961		28,024

F-41

 ­ ­ 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Synovus Financial Corp.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Synovus Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Synovus Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Synovus Financial Corp. changed its method of accounting for income tax uncertainties during 2007 and changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation and pension and other postretirement plans and applied the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 in 2006.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Synovus Financial Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 29, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Atlanta, Georgia

February 29, 2008

F-42

 ­ ­ 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL

CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Synovus Financial Corp. (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework.

Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2007, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework.

Richard E. Anthony Chairman & Chief Executive Officer	Thomas J. Prescott Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

F-43

 ­ ­ 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Synovus Financial Corp.:

We have audited Synovus Financial Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Synovus Financial Corp.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Synovus Financial Corp. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Synovus Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated February 29, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Atlanta, Georgia

February 29, 2008

F-44

Selected Financial Data ­ ­ 

	Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2007			2006		2005		2004		2003
Income Statement:
Total revenues(b)	$	1,536,996			1,487,337		1,292,166		1,186,898		1,070,988
Net interest income		1,148,948			1,125,789		965,216		859,531		762,456
Provision for losses on loans		170,208			75,148		82,532		75,319		71,777
Non-interest income		389,028			359,430		327,413		327,441		311,023
Non-interest expense		840,094			764,533		646,757		621,675		575,408
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes		342,935			415,103		359,050		314,941		274,586
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest(a)		183,370			201,814		157,396		122,092		114,339
Net income		526,305			616,917		516,446		437,033		388,925
Per share data:
Basic earnings per share
Income from continuing operations		1.05			1.29		1.15		1.02		0.91
Net income		1.61			1.92		1.66		1.42		1.29
Diluted earnings per share
Income from continuing operations		1.04			1.28		1.14		1.01		0.90
Net income		1.60			1.90		1.64		1.41		1.28
Cash dividends declared		0.82			0.78		0.73		0.69		0.66
Book value		10.43			11.39		9.43		8.52		7.43
Balance Sheet:
Investment securities		3,666,974			3,352,357		2,958,320		2,695,593		2,529,257
Loans, net of unearned income		26,498,585			24,654,552		21,392,347		19,480,396		16,464,914
Deposits		24,959,816			24,528,463		20,806,979		18,591,402		15,953,702
Long-term debt		1,890,235			1,343,358		1,928,005		1,873,247		1,530,798
Shareholders’ equity		3,441,590			3,708,650		2,949,329		2,641,289		2,245,039
Average total shareholders’ equity		3,935,910			3,369,954		2,799,496		2,479,404		2,166,777
Average total assets		32,895,295			29,831,172		26,293,003		23,275,001		20,412,853
Performance ratios and other data:
Return on average assets(c)		1.60	%		2.07		1.96		1.88		1.91
Return on average equity(c)		13.37			18.31		18.45		17.63		17.95
Net interest margin, before fees		3.85			4.12		4.03		3.92		3.89
Net interest margin, after fees		3.97			4.27		4.18		4.21		4.26
Efficiency ratio		55.14			51.18		49.79		52.06		53.34
Dividend payout ratio(d)		51.25			40.99		44.51		48.94		51.56
Average shareholders’ equity to average assets		11.96			11.30		10.65		10.65		10.61
Average shares outstanding, basic		326,849			321,241		311,495		307,262		302,010
Average shares outstanding, diluted		329,863			324,232		314,815		310,330		304,928

(a)	On December 31, 2007, Synovus Financial Corp. (“Synovus”) completed the tax-free spin-off of its shares of Total System Services, Inc. (“TSYS”) common stock to Synovus shareholders. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” the current period and historical consolidated results of operations and financial position of TSYS, as well as all costs recorded by Synovus associated with the spin-off of TSYS, are now presented as discontinued operations. Additionally, discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 include a $4.2 million after-tax gain related to the transfer of Synovus’ proprietary mutual funds to a non-affiliated third party.
(b)	Consists of net interest income and non-interest income, excluding securities gains (losses).
(c)	December 31, 2007 ratio includes both continuing and discontinued operations.
(d)	Determined by dividing cash dividends declared per share by diluted net income per share.

F-45

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Executive Summary

The following financial review provides a discussion of Synovus’ financial condition, changes in financial condition, and results of operations as well as a summary of Synovus’ critical accounting policies. This section should be read in conjunction with the preceding audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

About Our Business

Synovus is a financial services holding company, based in Columbus, Georgia, with approximately $33 billion in assets. Synovus provides integrated financial services including banking, financial management, insurance, mortgage and leasing services through 37 wholly-owned subsidiary banks and other Synovus offices in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Florida. At December 31, 2007, our banks ranged in size from $100.7 million to $6.1 billion in total assets.

Our Key Financial Performance Indicators

In terms of how we measure success in our business, the following are our key financial performance indicators:

•   Loan Growth	•   Credit Quality
•   Core Deposit Growth	•   Fee Income Growth
•   Net Interest Margin	•   Expense Management

2007 Financial Performance vs. 2006
(including discontinued operations)

Consolidated

•  Net income: $526.3 million, down 14.7%, compared to $616.9 million for 2006 (excluding expenses related to the TSYS spin-off, Visa litigation, and the Bank of America termination fee, net income of $579.8 million, down 0.7%, compared to $583.7 million for 2006).

•  Diluted earnings per share (EPS): $1.60, down 16.1% from 2006 (2007 EPS of $1.76 excluding expenses related to the TSYS spin-off and Visa litigation).

•   Loan growth: up $1.8 billion, or 7.5% compared to 2006.

•  Core deposit growth (total deposits less brokered time deposits): up $158.4 million, or 0.7%, compared to 2006

•  Net interest margin: 3.97%, compared to 4.27% for 2006.

•  Credit quality:

•  Nonperforming assets ratio of 1.67%, compared to 0.50% at year-end 2006, and

•  Past dues over 90 days and still accruing interest as a percentage of total loans of 0.13% compared to 0.14% at year-end 2006, and

•  Net charge-off ratio of 0.46%, compared to 0.26% for 2006.

•  Non-interest income growth: $389.0 million, up 8.2% from 2006.

•  Non-interest expense up 9.9% from 2006 (up 5.1% excluding Visa litigation expenses).

•  Return on assets: 1.60% compared to 2.07% for 2006.

•  Return on equity: 13.37% compared to 18.31% for 2006.

Additionally during 2007:

•  On November 7, 2007, Visa announced that it had reached a settlement with American Express regarding certain litigation. Synovus has a membership interest in Visa and, along with other banks, has an obligation to share in certain losses under various agreements with Visa in connection with this and other litigation. Synovus recorded a $12.0 million liability during the three months ended September 30, 2007 related to the American Express settlement, and recorded an additional Visa litigation accrual of $24.8 million during the three months ended December 31, 2007 as an estimate of Synovus’ indemnification obligations arising from other covered litigation of Visa.

•  On December 31, 2007, Synovus completed the spin-off of its shares of TSYS common stock to Synovus shareholders. Synovus owned approximately 80.6% of TSYS’ outstanding shares on the date of the spin-off. Each Synovus shareholder received 0.483921 of a share of TSYS common stock for each share of Synovus common stock held on December 18, 2007. Synovus shareholders received cash in lieu of fractional shares for amounts of less than one TSYS share.

•  Synovus opened 24 new retail branch banking locations and relocated 4 existing retail branches to new facilities in 2007.

F-46

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Presentation of net income and diluted earnings per share excluding expenses associated with the Visa litigation, TSYS spin-off, and Bank of America termination fee are non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) financial measures. The following tables reconcile net income and diluted net income per share, comparing non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures:

	Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2007		2006			% Chg
Consolidated:
Net income, as reported	$	526,305		616,917			(14.7	)%
Visa litigation expense, net of income taxes		22,478		—			nm
Spin-off related expenses, net of income taxes and minority interest		30,977		—			nm
Bank of America termination fee, net of accelerated amortization,
income taxes, and minority interest		—		(33,200	)		nm
Net income, as adjusted	$	579,760		583,717			(0.7	)%
Diluted net income per share:
Net income, as reported	$	1.60		1.90			(16.1	)%
Visa litigation expense, net of income taxes		0.07		—			nm
Spin-off related expenses, net of income taxes and minority interest		0.09		—			nm
Bank of America termination fee, net of accelerated amortization,
income taxes, and minority interest		—		(0.10	)		nm
Diluted net income per share, as adjusted	$	1.76		1.80			(2.4	)%
nm = not meaningful

	Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2007		2006		% Chg
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	342,935		415,103		(17.4	)%
Visa litigation expense, net of income taxes		22,478		—		nm
Income from continuing operations, as adjusted	$	365,413		415,103		(12.0	)%
Diluted net income per share:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	1.04		1.28		(18.8	)%
Visa litigation expense, net of income taxes		0.07		—		nm
Income from continuing operations per diluted share, as adjusted	$	1.11		1.28		(13.5	)%
nm = not meaningful

Synovus believes that the above non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful information to assist investors in understanding Synovus’ financial results, exclusive of items that management believes are not reflective of its operating results. The non-GAAP measures should not be considered by themselves or as a substitute for the GAAP measures. The non-GAAP measures should be considered as an additional view of the way Synovus’ financial measures are affected by the non-recurring spin-off related expenses, Visa litigation expenses, and the Bank of America termination fee.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and financial reporting policies of Synovus conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and to general practices within the banking and financial services industries. Synovus has identified certain of its accounting policies as “critical accounting policies.” In determining which accounting policies are critical in nature, Synovus has identified the policies that require significant judgment or involve complex estimates. The application of these policies has a significant impact on Synovus’ financial

F-47

Financial Review ­ ­ 

statements. Synovus’ financial results could differ significantly if different judgments or estimates are applied in the application of these policies.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Notes 1 and 6 to Synovus’ consolidated financial statements contains a discussion of the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2007 was $367.6 million.

During the second quarter of 2007, Synovus implemented certain refinements to its allowance for loan losses methodology, specifically the way that loss factors are derived. These refinements resulted in a reallocation of the factors used to determine the allocated and unallocated components of the allowance along with a more disaggregated approach to estimate the required allowance by loan portfolio classification. These changes did not have a significant impact on the total allowance for loan losses or provision for losses on loans upon implementation.

The allowance for loan losses is determined based on an analysis which assesses the probable loss within the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses consists of two components: the allocated and unallocated allowances. Both components of the allowance are available to cover inherent losses in the portfolio. Significant judgments or estimates made in the determination of the allowance for loan losses consist of the risk ratings for loans in the commercial loan portfolio, the valuation of the collateral for loans that are classified as impaired loans, and the qualitative loss factors.

Commercial Loans — Risk Ratings and Loss Factors

Commercial loans are assigned a risk rating on a nine point scale. For commercial loans that are not considered impaired, the allocated allowance for loan losses is determined based upon the loss percentage factors that correspond to each risk rating.

The risk ratings are based on the borrowers’ credit risk profile, considering factors such as debt service history and capacity, inherent risk in the credit (e.g., based on industry type and source of repayment), and collateral position. Ratings 6 through 9 are modeled after the bank regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss. Loss percentage factors are based on the probable loss including qualitative factors. The probable loss considers the probability of default, the loss given default, and certain qualitative factors as determined by loan category and risk rating. The probability of default and loss given default are based on industry data. The qualitative factors consider credit concentrations, recent levels and trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, and growth in the loan portfolio. The occurrence of certain events could result in changes to the loss factors. Accordingly, these loss factors are reviewed periodically and modified as necessary.

Each loan is assigned a risk rating during the approval process. This process begins with a rating recommendation from the loan officer responsible for originating the loan. The rating recommendation is subject to approvals from other members of management and/or loan committees depending on the size and type of credit. Ratings are re-evaluated at least every twelve months in connection with the loan review process at each bank. Additionally, an independent holding company credit review function evaluates each bank’s risk rating process at least every twelve to eighteen months.

Impaired Loans

Management considers a loan to be impaired when the ultimate collectibility of all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement are in doubt. A majority of our impaired loans are collateral dependent. The impairment on these loans is determined based upon fair value estimates (net of selling costs) of the respective collateral. The actual losses on these loans could differ significantly if the fair value of the collateral is different from the estimates used by Synovus in determining the impairment. The majority of Synovus’ impaired loans are secured by real estate. The fair value of these real estate properties is generally determined based upon appraisals performed by a certified or licensed appraiser. Management also considers other factors or recent developments which could result in adjustments to the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals. Estimated losses on collateral dependent impaired loans are typically charged-off. Estimated losses on all other impaired loans are included in the allowance for loan losses through a charge to the provision for losses on loans.

Retail Loans — Loss Factors

The allocated allowance for loan losses for retail loans is generally determined by segregating the retail loan portfolio into pools of homogeneous loan categories. Loss factors applied to these pools are based on the probable loss including qualitative factors. The probable loss considers the probability of default, the loss given default, and certain qualitative factors as determined by loan category and risk rating. The probability of default and loss given default are based on industry data. The qualitative factors consider credit concentrations, recent levels and trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, and growth in the loan portfolio. The occurrence of certain events could result in changes to the loss factors. Accordingly, these loss factors are reviewed periodically and modified as necessary.

F-48

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Unallocated Component

The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses is considered necessary to provide for certain environmental and economic factors that effect the probable loss inherent in the entire loan portfolio. Unallocated loss factors included in the determination of the unallocated allowance are economic factors, changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff, and changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards. Certain macro- economic factors and changes in business conditions and developments could have a material impact on the collectibility of the overall portfolio. As an example, a rapidly rising interest rate environment could have a material impact on certain borrowers’ ability to pay. The unallocated component is meant to cover such risks.

Income Taxes

Notes 1 and 17 to Synovus’ consolidated financial statements contain a discussion of income taxes. The calculation of Synovus’ income tax provision is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgments in its determination. As part of Synovus’ overall business strategy, management must consider tax laws and regulations that apply to the specific facts and circumstances under consideration. This analysis includes the amount and timing of the realization of income tax liabilities or benefits. Management closely monitors tax developments on both the state and federal level in order to evaluate the effect they may have on Synovus’ overall tax position. At December 31, 2007, Synovus concluded that it did not need a valuation allowance for its deferred income tax assets and had an accrual of $7.1 million for unrecognized tax benefits.

Asset Impairment

Goodwill

Under SFAS No. 142 (SFAS 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is required to be tested for impairment annually. The combination of the income approach utilizing the discounted cash flow (DCF) method and the market approach, utilizing readily available market valuation multiples, is used to estimate the fair value.

Under the DCF method, the fair value of the reporting unit reflects the present value of the projected earnings that will be generated by each reporting unit after taking into account the revenues and expenses associated with the reporting unit, the relative risk that the cash flows will occur, the contribution of other assets, and an appropriate discount rate to reflect the value of invested capital. Cash flows are estimated for future periods based on historical data and projections provided by management. If the actual cash flows are not consistent with Synovus’ estimates, an impairment charge may result.

Under the market approach, the fair value of the reporting unit reflects the price at which similar companies are exchanged. The multiples utilized are the average price to tangible book value, and the average price to the previous twelve months’ earnings multiple.

Notes 3 and 7 to Synovus’ consolidated financial statements contain a discussion of goodwill. The net carrying value of goodwill as of December 31, 2007 was $519.1 million. Based on the 2007 assessments, Synovus concluded that goodwill was not impaired.

Long-Lived Assets and Other Intangibles

The Company reviews long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and other intangibles subject to amortization, including core deposit premiums and customer relationships, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the actual cash flows are not consistent with the Company’s estimates, an impairment charge may result.

Acquisitions

Table 1 summarizes the acquisitions completed during the past three years.

Table 1  Acquisitions

(Dollars in thousands)

		Total		Shares
Company and Location	Date Closed	Assets		Issued		Cash
Banking Corporation of Florida	April 1, 2006	$	417,787		2,938,791		—
Naples, Florida
Riverside Bancshares, Inc.	March 25, 2006		765,464		5,883,426		—
Marietta, Georgia

This information is presented in further detail in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

F-49

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Discontinued Operations

Transfer of Mutual Funds

During 2007, Synovus transferred its proprietary mutual funds to a non-affiliated third party. As a result of the transfer, Synovus received gross proceeds of $8.0 million and incurred transaction related costs of $1.1 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $6.9 million, or $4.2 million, after tax. The net gain has been reported as a component of income from discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of income. Financial results for 2007, 2006, and 2005 of the business have not been presented as discontinued operations as such amounts are inconsequential. This business did not have significant assets, liabilities, revenues, or expenses associated with it.

TSYS Spin-off

On December 31, 2007, Synovus completed the tax-free spin-off of its shares of TSYS common stock to Synovus shareholders. Synovus owned approximately 80.6% of TSYS’ outstanding shares on the date of the spin-off. Each Synovus shareholder received 0.483921 of a share of TSYS common stock for each share of Synovus common stock held as of December 18, 2007. Synovus shareholders received cash in lieu of fractional shares for amounts of less than one TSYS share.

Pursuant to the agreement and plan of distribution, TSYS paid on a pro rata basis to its shareholders, including Synovus, a one-time cash dividend of $600 million or $3.0309 per TSYS share based on the number of TSYS shares outstanding as of the record date of December 17, 2007. Synovus received $483.8 million in proceeds from this one-time cash dividend. The dividend was paid on December 31, 2007.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” the current period and historical consolidated results of operations of TSYS, as well as all costs associated with the spin-off of TSYS, are now presented as income from discontinued operations. The balance sheet as of the record date of December 31, 2007 does not include assets and liabilities of TSYS, while all prior period assets and liabilities of TSYS are presented as discontinued operations.

The following table shows the components of income from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:

Table 2  Discontinued Operations

(In thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006		2005
TSYS net income, net of minority interest (excluding spin-off related expenses)	$	210,147			201,814		157,396
Spin-off related expenses, net of income taxes:
TSYS, net of minority interest		(18,248	)		—		—
Synovus		(12,729	)		—		—
Gain on transfer of mutual funds, net of income taxes		4,200			—		—
Total income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest	$	183,370			201,814		157,396

See note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.

Earning Assets, Sources of Funds, and Net Interest Income

Earning Assets and Sources of Funds

Average total assets for 2007 were $32.90 billion or 10.3% over 2006 average total assets of $29.83 billion. Average earning assets for 2007 were $29.11 billion, which represented 88.5% of average total assets. Average earning assets increased $2.59 billion, or 9.8%, over 2006. The $2.59 billion increase consisted primarily of a $2.18 billion increase in average net loans and a $395.0 million increase in average investment securities available for sale. The primary funding source for this earning asset growth was a $2.04 billion increase in average deposits. Average shareholders’ equity for 2007 was $3.94 billion, which represents an increase of $566.0 million over 2006.

For 2006, average total assets increased $3.54 billion, or 13.5% from 2005. Average earning assets for 2006 were $26.52 billion, which represented 88.9% of average total assets. For more detailed information on the average balance sheets

F-50

Financial Review ­ ­ 

for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, refer to Table 4.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income (interest income less interest expense) is a major component of net income, representing the earnings of the primary business of gathering funds from customer deposits and other sources and investing those funds in loans and investment securities. Our long-term objective is to manage those assets and liabilities to maximize net interest income while balancing interest rate, credit, liquidity, and capital risks.

Net interest income is presented in this discussion on a tax-equivalent basis, so that the income from assets exempt from federal income taxes is adjusted based on a statutory marginal federal tax rate of 35% in all years (See Table 3). The net interest margin is defined as taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average total interest earning assets and provides an indication of the efficiency of the earnings from balance sheet activities. The net interest margin is affected by changes in the spread between interest earning asset yields and interest bearing liability costs (spread rate), and by the percentage of interest earning assets funded by non-interest bearing funding sources.

Net interest income for 2007 was $1.15 billion, up $23.2 million, or 2.1%, from 2006. On a taxable-equivalent basis, net interest income was $1.15 billion, up $22.4 million, or 2.0%, over 2006. During 2007, average interest earning assets increased $2.59 billion, or 9.8%, with the majority of this increase attributable to loan growth. Increases in the level of deposits and other borrowed funds were the primary funding sources for the increase in earning assets.

Net Interest Margin

The net interest margin after fees was 3.97% for 2007, down 30 basis points from 2006. The yield on earning assets increased 9 basis points, which was offset by a 39 basis point increase in the effective cost of funds, which includes non-interest bearing funding sources, primarily demand deposits.

The yields on earning assets were positively impacted by higher realized yields on investment securities, which increased 45 basis points, primarily due to the maturity of lower yielding investments that were reinvested at higher rates available during 2007. Loan yields, which increased 4 basis points, were favorably impacted by a 10 basis point increase in the average prime rate in 2007 as compared to 2006 and the maturity and replacement of lower yielding fixed rate loans throughout the year. These positive impacts on loan yields were partially offset by an increase in the cost to carry the elevated levels of nonperforming assets in 2007 compared to 2006. The primary factors driving the 39 basis point increase in the effective cost of funds were a 53 basis point increase in the cost of non-brokered time deposits and a customer driven shift from lower cost deposit types such as NOW and savings accounts to higher cost time deposits and money market accounts. A continued competitive pricing environment in our marketplace also contributed to the increase in the cost of funds.

The net interest margin after fees was 4.27% for 2006, up 9 basis points from 2005. The yield on earning assets increased 116 basis points, which was partially offset by a 107 basis point increase in the effective cost of funds, which includes non-interest bearing funding sources, primarily demand deposits.

The primary increase in the yield on earning assets came from increased yields on loans, which increased 127 basis points, primarily due to increased yields on the variable rate portion of the loan portfolio. These loan yields were favorably impacted by a 177 basis point increase in the average prime rate in 2006 as compared to 2005. The primary factors driving the 107 basis point increase in the effective cost of funds were a 137 basis point increase in the cost of non-brokered time deposits and a 156 basis point increase in the cost of money market accounts. These rate increases were a result of the higher interest rate environment and growth in these accounts as consumer preference continued to favor higher yielding deposit accounts. A more competitive pricing environment in our marketplace also contributed to the increase in the cost of funds.

Table 3  Net Interest Income

(In thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007		2006		2005
Interest income	$	2,238,404		2,016,466		1,496,261
Taxable-equivalent adjustment		5,059		5,790		6,392
Interest income, taxable-equivalent		2,243,463		2,022,256		1,502,653
Interest expense		1,089,456		890,677		531,046
Net interest income, taxable-equivalent	$	1,154,007		1,131,579		971,607

F-51

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 4  Consolidated Average Balances, Interest, and Yields

(Dollars in thousands)

	2007									2006									2005
	Average						Yield/			Average						Yield/			Average						Yield/
	Balance			Interest			Rate			Balance			Interest			Rate			Balance			Interest			Rate
Assets
Interest earning assets:
Taxable loans, net(a)(b)	$	25,467,316			2,043,589			8.02	%	$	23,254,146			1,857,005			7.99	%	$	20,406,761			1,372,464			6.73	%
Tax-exempt loans, net(a)(b)(c)		55,007			3,987			7.25			61,792			4,408			7.13			63,582			4,262			6.70
Allowance for loan losses		(335,032	)		—			—			(309,658	)		—			—			(279,533	)		—			—
Loans, net		25,187,291			2,047,576			8.13			23,006,280			1,861,413			8.09			20,190,810			1,376,726			6.82
Investment securities available for sale:
Taxable investment securities		3,429,175			164,631			4.80			3,009,962			129,219			4.29			2,609,113			98,726			3.78
Tax-exempt investment securities(c)		174,431			11,817			6.77			198,691			13,498			6.79			216,773			15,001			6.92
Total investment securities		3,603,606			176,448			4.90			3,208,653			142,717			4.45			2,825,886			113,727			4.02
Trading account assets		52,274			3,418			6.53			43,201			2,691			6.23			11,380			643			5.65
Interest earning deposits with banks		21,025			1,104			5.25			8,763			375			4.28			6,288			172			2.74
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		97,462			5,258			5.39			123,804			6,422			5.19			120,809			4,082			3.38
Mortgage loans held for sale		152,007			9,659			6.35			132,332			8,638			6.53			113,969			7,303			6.41
Total interest earning assets		29.113,665			2,243,463			7.71			26,523,033			2,022,256			7.62			23,269,142			1,502,653			6.46
Cash and due from banks		529,306									538,949									620,480
Premises and equipment, net		514,280									442,753									388,289
Other real estate		52,735									26,000									22,690
Other assets(d)		1,355,137									1,039,837									792,899
Assets of discontinued operations(e)		1,330,172									1,260,600									1,199,503
Total assets	$	32,895,295								$	29,831,172								$	26,293,003
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	3,125,802			68,779			2.20		$	3,006,308			57,603			1.92		$	2,975,016			35,085			1.18
Money market accounts		7,714,360			336,286			4.36			6,515,079			269,899			4.14			5,203,104			133,689			2.57
Savings deposits		483,368			2,525			0.52			542,793			3,538			0.65			555,205			1,958			0.35
Time deposits (less brokered time deposits)		7,004,347			348,332			4.97			6,340,959			281,366			4.44			4,918,782			150,959			3.07
Brokered time deposits		3,084,006			156,550			5.08			2,855,191			134,263			4.70			2,557,659			86,714			3.39
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		1,957,990			92,970			4.75			1,578,163			72,958			4.62			1,197,342			34,342			2.87
Long-term debt		1,619,536			84,014			5.19			1,515,306			71,050			4.69			2,082,031			88,299			4.24
Total interest bearing liabilities		24,989,409			1,089,456			4.36			22,353,799			890,677			3.98			19,489,139			531,046			2.72
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		3,409,506									3,518,312									3,416,053
Other liabilities		246,213									234,022									146,654
Liabilities of and minority interest in discontinued operations(e)		314,257									355,085									441,661
Shareholders’ equity		3,935,910									3,369,954									2,799,496
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	32,895,295								$	29,831,172								$	26,293,003
Net interest income/margin					1,154,007			3.97	%					1,131,579			4.27	%					971,607			4.18	%
Taxable-equivalent adjustment					(5,059	)								(5,790	)								(6,392	)
Net interest income, actual				$	1,148,948								$	1,125,789								$	965,215

(a)	Average loans are shown net of unearned income. Nonperforming loans are included.
(b)	Interest income includes loan fees as follows: 2007 — $36.2 million, 2006 — $40.4 million, 2005 — $33.5 million.
(c)	Reflects taxable-equivalent adjustments, using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%, in adjusting interest on tax-exempt loans and investment securities to a taxable-equivalent basis.
(d)	Includes average net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale of ($15.1) million, ($54.5) million, and ($22.6) million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
(e)	On December 31, 2007, Synovus completed the tax-free spin-off of its shares of TSYS common stock to Synovus shareholders; accordingly, the assets and liabilities of TSYS are presented as discontinued operations.

F-52

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 5  Rate/Volume Analysis

(In thousands)

	2007 Compared to 2006									2006 Compared to 2005
	Change Due to (a)									Change Due to (a)
				Yield/			Net						Yield/			Net
	Volume			Rate			Change			Volume			Rate			Change
Interest earned on:
Taxable loans, net	$	176,832			9,752			186,584		$	191,629			292,912			484,541
Tax-exempt loans, net(b)		(484	)		63			(421	)		(120	)		266			146
Taxable investment securities		17,984			17,428			35,412			15,152			15,341			30,493
Tax-exempt investment securities(b)		(1,647	)		(34	)		(1,681	)		(1,251	)		(252	)		(1,503	)
Trading account assets		565			162			727			1,798			250			2,048
Interest earning deposits with banks		524			206			730			68			134			202
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		(1,367	)		202			(1,165	)		101			2,240			2,341
Mortgage loans held for sale		1,285			(264	)		1,021			1,177			158			1,335
Total interest income		193,692			27,515			221,207			208,554			311,049			519,603
Interest paid on:
Interest bearing demand deposits		2,294			8,882			11,176			369			22,149			22,518
Money market accounts		49,650			16,737			66,387			33,718			102,492			136,210
Savings deposits		(386	)		(627	)		(1,013	)		(43	)		1,623			1,580
Time deposits (less brokered time deposits)		29,454			37,512			66,966			43,661			86,746			130,407
Brokered time deposits		10,754			11,533			22,287			10,086			37,463			47,549
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		17,548			2,464			20,012			10,930			27,686			38,616
Other borrowed funds		4,888			8,076			12,964			(24,029	)		6,780			(17,249	)
Total interest expense		114,202			84,577			198,779			74,692			284,939			359,631
Net interest income	$	79,490			(57,062	)		22,428		$	133,844			26,128			159,972

(a)	The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to the yield/rate component.
(b)	Reflects taxable-equivalent adjustments, using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%, in adjusting interest on tax-exempt loans and investment securities to a taxable-equivalent basis.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income consists of a wide variety of fee generating services. Total non-interest income was $389.0 million in 2007, up 8.2% compared to 2006. Total non-interest income for 2006 was $359.4 million, up 9.8% over 2005. Table 6 shows the principal components of non-interest income.

F-53

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 6  Non-Interest Income

(In thousands)

	2007		2006			2005
Service charges on deposits	$	112,142		112,417			109,960
Fiduciary and asset management fees		50,761		48,627			45,454
Brokerage and investment banking revenue		31,980		26,729			24,487
Mortgage banking income		27,006		29,255			28,682
Bankcard fees		47,770		44,303			38,813
Securities gains (losses), net		980		(2,118	)		463
Other fee income		39,307		38,743			34,148
Other operating income		79,082		61,474			45,407
Total non-interest income	$	389,028		359,430			327,414

Service charges on deposits represent the single largest fee income component. Service charges on deposits totaled $112.1 million in 2007, a decrease of 0.2% from the previous year, and $112.4 million in 2006, an increase of 2.2% from 2005. Service charges on deposit accounts consist of non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees (which represent approximately two — thirds of the total), account analysis fees, and all other service charges. NSF fees increased by $1.7 million or 2.2% over 2006. Account analysis fees were up $744 thousand or 5.2% from 2006 levels. All other service charges on deposit accounts, which consist primarily of monthly fees on consumer demand deposit and savings accounts, were down $2.7 million or 12.5% compared to 2006. The decline in all other service charges was largely due to growth in the number of checking accounts with no monthly service charges as well as the discontinuance of certain online banking fees.

Fiduciary and asset management fees are derived from providing estate administration, employee benefit plan administration, personal trust, corporate trust, investment management and financial planning services. Fiduciary and asset management fees were $50.8 million for 2007, an increase of 4.4% over the prior year, and $48.6 million for 2006, an increase of 7.0% from 2005. The increase in fiduciary and asset management fees for 2007 over 2006 is primarily due to an increase in managed assets in 2007 compared to 2006. The increase for 2006 over 2005 is primarily due to higher average rates of return being earned on managed assets in 2006 as well as certain one-time termination fees recognized in 2006.

At December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the market value of assets under management was approximately $9.56 billion, $8.80 billion and $8.56 billion, respectively. Assets under management at December 31, 2007 and 2006 increased 8.7% and 2.8% from December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Assets under management consist of all assets where Synovus has investment authority. Assets under advisement were approximately $3.53 billion, $3.82 billion, and $3.60 billion at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Assets under advisement consist of non-managed assets as well as non-custody assets where Synovus earns a consulting fee. Assets under advisement at December 31, 2007 and 2006 decreased 7.8% and increased 6.2% from December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total assets under management and advisement were $13.09 billion at December 31, 2007 compared to $12.63 billion at December 31, 2006 and $12.16 billion at December 31, 2005. Many of the fees charged are based on asset values, and increases in these values would directly impact fees earned.

Brokerage and investment banking revenue was $32.0 million in 2007, a 19.6% increase over the $26.7 million reported in 2006. Brokerage assets were $4.08 billion and $4.14 billion as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by our retail brokerage unit. Synovus began to integrate the retail brokerage sales force into the bank structure during 2006 with the unit fully integrated in 2007 and has experienced accelerated revenue growth following this re-organization.

Total brokerage and investment banking revenue for 2006 was $26.7 million, up 9.2% over 2005. The increase in revenue was mainly driven by a full year’s production of our capital markets unit during 2006 and only a partial year in 2005.

Mortgage banking income was $27.0 million in 2007, a 7.7% decrease from 2006 levels. Mortgage production volume is $1.43 billion in 2007, down 5.5% compared to 2006. The decline in mortgage banking income and production volume in 2007 compared to 2006 is due to a slow-down in residential housing during the latter half of 2007.

Total mortgage banking income for 2006 was $29.3 million, up 2.0% from 2005 levels. Total mortgage production volume was $1.51 billion in 2006, flat compared to 2005.

Bankcard fees totaled $47.8 million in 2007, an increase of 7.8% over the previous year, and $44.3 million in 2006, an increase of 14.2% from 2005. Bankcard fees consist of credit card merchant and interchange fees and debit card interchange fees. Debit card interchange fees were $15.5 million in 2007, an increase of 6.3% over the previous year, and

F-54

Financial Review ­ ­ 

$14.6 million in 2006, an increase of 21.0% from 2005. The increase in debit card interchange fees for 2007 was primarily driven by an increase in volume and a higher retention rate. Credit card fees were $32.3 million in 2007, an increase of 8.6% compared to 2006, and $29.7 million in 2006, an increase of 11.1% compared to 2005. The increase in credit card fees for 2007 was primarily due to an increase in volume.

Other fee income includes fees for letters of credit, safe deposit box fees, access fees for automatic teller machine use, official check issuance fees, and other miscellaneous fee-related income. The increase for 2007 was primarily due to additional fee income generated from customer interest rate swap transactions of $1.6 million, offset slightly by trading losses. For the year ended December 31, 2006, $1.9 million of the total increase over the year ended December 31, 2005 was due to additional fee income generated from customer interest rate swap transactions, and $1.2 million was due to trading gains.

Other operating income was $79.1 million in 2007, compared to $61.5 million in 2006. The main components of other operating income are income from company-owned life insurance policies, insurance commissions, and other items discussed below.

Other operating income includes $15.5 million, $5.3 million, and $2.4 million of income from increases in the fair value of venture capital investments in 2007, 2006, and 2005 respectively. Other operating income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 also includes $6.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively, from gains resulting from the sale and redemption of MasterCard common stock.

Non-Interest Expense

2007 vs. 2006

Reported total non-interest expense for 2007 was $840.1 million, up $75.6 million or 9.9% over 2006. Table 7 summarizes this data for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.

Table 7   Non-Interest Expense

(In thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2007		2006		2005
Salaries and other personnel expense	$	455,158		450,373		370,223
Net occupancy and equipment expense		112,888		100,270		90,549
Other operating expenses		235,248		213,890		185,985
Visa litigation expense		36,800		—		—
Total non-interest expense	$	840,094		764,533		646,757

During 2007, Synovus recognized litigation expenses of $36.8 million associated with indemnification obligations arising from Synovus’ ownership interest in Visa. See “Commitments and Contingencies” on page 70 for further discussion of the Visa litigation expense. Excluding the Visa litigation expense, total non-interest expense increased $38.8 million or 5.1% over 2006.

Total salaries and other personnel expense increased $4.8 million, or 1.1%, in 2007 compared to 2006. Total employees were 7,385 at December 31, 2007, up 196 or 2.7% from 7,189 employees at December 31, 2006. In addition to merit and promotional salary adjustments, this category was also impacted by total performance-based incentive compensation which was approximately $25.0 million in 2007, a $38.3 million or 60.5% decrease from 2006 levels.

Net occupancy and equipment expense increased $12.6 million, or 12.6% during 2007, driven by the net addition of 19 branches from 2006. Rent expense increased by approximately $4.5 million and repairs and maintenance increased by $2.1 million in 2007 as compared to 2006.

Other operating expenses increased $21.4 million, or 10.0%, over 2006. The largest expense category increase was from repossession and recovery, which increased $12.4 million, or 377.7%, in 2007 as compared to 2006 due primarily to losses and expenses associated with higher levels of foreclosed real estate.

The efficiency ratio (non-interest expense divided by the sum of federal taxable equivalent net interest income and non-interest income excluding net securities gains and losses) was 54.45% for 2007 compared to 51.18% in 2006. The net overhead ratio (non-interest expense less non-interest income -

F-55

Financial Review ­ ­ 

excluding net securities gains and losses divided by total average assets) was 1.43% for both 2007 and 2006.

2006 vs. 2005

Non-interest expense increased $117.8 million, or 18.2%, in 2006 over 2005. This increase reflects the impact of share-based compensation, required by SFAS No. 123R “Share-Based Payment,” which was effective January 1, 2006. The increase for 2006, excluding share-based compensation and the impact of acquisitions completed in 2006, was 13.4%.

Total salaries and other personnel expense increased $80.2 million or 21.6%. Incremental share-based compensation expense was $17.0 million of the total increase. Approximately $7.3 million was related to the net effect of acquisitions completed in 2006. The remaining net increase related to normal merit and promotional salary adjustments as well as increases in the total number of employees, and performance based incentive compensation.

Net occupancy and equipment expense increased $9.7 million or 10.7% during 2006. Approximately $2.2 million of the total increase was related to the net effect of acquisitions completed in 2006. Rent expense increased by approximately $2.0 million during 2006. Depreciation increased by $3.0 million.

Other operating expenses increased $27.9 million, or 15.0%, over 2005. Approximately $5.0 million of the total increase was related to the net effect of acquisitions completed in 2006. The largest expense category increase was from third party processing services. Excluding acquisitions, third party processing services increased $9.2 million, or 31.1%, in 2006 compared to 2005.

Investment Securities Available for Sale

The investment securities portfolio consists principally of debt and equity securities classified as available for sale. Investment securities available for sale provide Synovus with a source of liquidity and a relatively stable source of income. The investment securities portfolio also provides management with a tool to balance the interest rate risk of its loan and deposit portfolios. At December 31, 2007, approximately $3.1 billion of these investment securities were pledged as required collateral for certain deposits, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and FHLB advances. See Table 9 for maturity and average yield information of the investment securities available for sale portfolio.

The investment strategy focuses on the use of the investment securities portfolio to manage the interest rate risk created by the inherent mismatch between the loan and deposit portfolios. Synovus’ interest rate risk management strategy during 2007 was to maintain a relatively neutral interest rate risk position. In coordination with this strategy, Synovus held portfolio duration at a relatively constant level for the year. The average duration of Synovus’ investment securities portfolio was 3.49 years at December 31, 2007 compared to 3.69 years at December 31, 2006.

Due to strong loan demand at subsidiary banks, there is little need for investment securities to utilize unpledged deposits. As such, the investment securities are primarily U.S. Government agencies and Government agency sponsored mortgage-backed securities, both of which have a high degree of liquidity and limited credit risk. A mortgage-backed security depends on the underlying pool of mortgage loans to provide a cash flow pass-through of principal and interest. At December 31, 2007, all of the collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed pass-through securities held by Synovus were issued or backed by Federal agencies.

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the estimated fair value of investment securities available for sale as a percentage of their amortized cost was 100.7% and 99.3%, respectively. The investment securities available for sale portfolio had gross unrealized gains of $40.6 million and gross unrealized losses of $14.5 million, for a net unrealized gain of $26.1 million as of December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2006, the investment securities available for sale portfolio had a net unrealized loss of $24.8 million. Shareholders’ equity included a net unrealized gain of $16.0 million and a net unrealized loss of $15.2 million on the available for sale portfolio as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

During 2007, the average balance of investment securities available for sale increased to $3.60 billion, compared to $3.21 billion in 2006. Synovus earned a taxable-equivalent rate of 4.90% and 4.45% for 2007 and 2006, respectively, on its investment securities available for sale portfolio. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, average investment securities available for sale represented 12.4% and 12.1%, respectively, of average interest earning assets.

The calculation of weighted average yields for investment securities available for sale in Table 9 is based on the amortized cost and effective yields of each security. The yield on state and municipal securities is computed on a taxable-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%. Maturity information is presented based upon contractual maturity. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

F-56

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 8  Investment Securities Available for Sale

(In thousands)

	December 31,
	2007		2006		2005
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities	$	1,945,381		1,770,570		1,624,612
Mortgage-backed securities		1,430,323		1,275,358		1,006,728
State and municipal securities		164,556		196,185		212,371
Other investments		126,714		110,244		114,609
Total	$	3,666,974		3,352,357		2,958,320

F-57

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 9  Maturities and Average Yields of Investment Securities Available for Sale

(Dollars in thousands)

	December 31, 2007
	Investment Securities
	Available for Sale
	Estimated		Average
	Fair Value		Yield
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities:
Within 1 year	$	420,352		4.00	%
1 to 5 years		748,714		4.80
5 to 10 years		546,154		5.48
More than 10 years		230,161		5.66
Total	$	1,945,381		4.91
State and municipal securities:
Within 1 year	$	16,450		6.59
1 to 5 years		63,345		7.06
5 to 10 years		68,801		7.31
More than 10 years		15,960		7.10
Total	$	164,556		7.12
Other investments:
Within 1 year	$	848		4.04
1 to 5 years		1,247		6.24
5 to 10 years		1,800		9.50
More than 10 years		8,589		8.86
Total	$	12,484		8.36
Equity securities	$	114,230		5.95
Mortgage-backed securities	$	1,430,323		4.95
Total investment securities:
Within 1 year	$	437,650		4.10
1 to 5 years		813,306		4.98
5 to 10 years		616,755		5.70
More than 10 years		254,710		5.86
Equity securities		114,230		5.95
Mortgage-backed securities		1,430,323		4.95
Total	$	3,666,974		5.07	%

Loans

Since lending activities are a significant source of revenue, our main objective is to adhere to sound lending practices. When analyzing prospective loans, management considers both interest rate and credit quality objectives in determining whether to extend a given loan and the appropriate pricing for that loan. Operating under a decentralized structure, management emphasizes lending in the local markets we

F-58

Financial Review ­ ­ 

serve. Synovus strives to maintain a diversified loan portfolio to spread risk and reduce exposure to economic downturns that may occur in different segments of the economy, geographic locations, or in particular industries. Table 10 illustrates that a significant portion of the loan portfolio is in the real estate sector. However, as discussed further, these loans are diversified by geography, industry and loan type. The loan policy discourages loans to highly speculative real estate developments, highly leveraged transactions, and other industries known for excessive risk.

Portfolio Composition

Synovus continues to operate its successful relationship banking model, and has continued to maintain and further develop a strong presence in each of its local markets. The loan portfolio spreads across five southeastern states with diverse economies. The Georgia banks represent a majority with 52.5% of the consolidated portfolio. South Carolina represents 15%, followed by Alabama with 14.1%, Florida with 13.6%, and Tennessee with 4.8%.

The commercial loan portfolio consists of commercial and industrial and real estate loans. These loans are granted primarily on the borrower’s general credit standing and on the strength of the borrower’s ability to generate repayment cash flows from income sources. Real estate construction and mortgage loans are secured by commercial real estate as well as 1-4 family residences, and represent extensions of credit used as interim or permanent financing of real estate properties.

The presentation of commercial loans extended for the purpose of financing owner-occupied properties has been separately classified in 2007. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in 2007.

Total commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2007 were $11.88 billion or 44.8% of the total loan portfolio. As shown on Table 15, the commercial real estate loan portfolio is diversified among various property types: investment properties, 1-4 family properties, and land acquisition.

The commercial real estate loan portfolio at December 31, 2007 and 2006 includes loans in the Atlanta market totaling $3.06 billion and 2.94 billion, respectively, of which $1.69 billion at each year end are 1-4 family property loans.

Included in the commercial category are $4.24 billion in loans for the purpose of financing owner-occupied properties. The primary source of repayment on these loans is revenue generated from products or services offered by the business or organization. The secondary source of repayment on these loans is the real estate.

Total retail loans as of December 31, 2007 were $4.0 billion. Retail loans consist of residential mortgages, home equity lines, credit card loans, and other installment loans. Synovus does not have indirect automobile loans. Retail lending decisions are made based upon the cash flow or earning power of the borrower that represents the primary source of repayment. However, in many lending transactions collateral is taken to provide an additional measure of security. Collateral securing these loans provides a secondary source of repayment in that the collateral may be liquidated. Synovus determines the need for collateral on a case-by-case basis. Factors considered include the purpose of the loan, current and prospective credit-worthiness of the customer, terms of the loan, and economic conditions.

Portfolio Growth

At December 31, 2007, total loans outstanding were $26.50 billion, an increase of 7.5% over 2006. Average loans increased 9.5% or $2.18 billion compared to 2006, representing 86.5% of average earning assets and 76.6% of average total assets. The year-over-year growth of $1.84 billion was diverse due in part to retail and commercial strategies which are essential for maintaining a balance in our growth. Growth in the commercial and industrial loan portfolio was 7.4% compared to a growth rate of 6.9% for the commercial real estate portfolio. The retail portfolio grew by 9.3% with most of the growth driven by home equity lines and consumer mortgages.

Total commercial real estate loans increased by $769.8 million, or 6.9% from year-end 2006. The commercial real estate portfolio growth was led by strong growth in income-producing properties, as market conditions resulted in substantially slower growth in the 1-4 family residential properties.

Commercial and industrial loans increased by $735.2 million or 7.4% from year-end 2006. Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans increased $550.3 million or 9.4% over 2006. Owner occupied loans increased $184.9 million or 4.6% from year end 2006.

Retail loans increased by $338.5 million or 9.3% from year-end 2006. Real estate mortgage loans grew $329.7 million, or 11.4%, driven by another year of strong growth in home equity loans. Home equity loans, our primary retail loan product, increased $179.7 million or 13.2% compared to a year ago. Our home equity loan portfolio consists primarily of loans with strong credit scores, conservative debt-to-income ratios, and appropriate loan-to-value ratios. The utilization rate (total amount outstanding as a percentage of total available lines) of this portfolio at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately 58% and 56%, respectively. These loans are primarily

F-59

Financial Review ­ ­ 

extended to customers who have an existing banking relationship with Synovus.

In addition to home equity lines, retail real estate mortgage also includes $1.67 billion in mortgage loans at December 31, 2007. Mortgage loans grew by $150.1 million or 9.9% from year end 2006. These loans are primarily extended to customers who have an existing banking relationship with Synovus.

Retail loans also include $291.1 million in credit card loans at December 31, 2007. These loans grew by 5.4% since year end 2006. Consistent with prior years, credit card growth is driven by cross-selling efforts to existing customers.

Table 11 shows the maturity of selected loan categories as of December 31, 2007. Also provided are the amounts due after one year, classified according to the sensitivity in interest rates.

Actual repayments of loans may differ from the contractual maturities reflected in Table 11 because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations with and without prepayment penalties. Additionally, the refinancing of such loans or the potential delinquency of such loans could create differences between the contractual maturities and the actual repayment of such loans.

Table 10  Loans by Type

(Dollars in thousands)

	December 31,
	2007						2006						2005						2004						2003
	Amount			% *			Amount			% *			Amount			% *			Amount			% *			Amount			% *
Commercial:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	6,424,499			24.2	%		5,874,204			23.8	%		5,268,042			24.6	%		5,064,828			26.0	%		4,651,864			28.3
Owner occupied		4,239,639			16.0			4,054,728			16.4			3,685,026			17.2			3,399,356			17.5			3,012,091			18.3
Real estate — construction		8,007,794			30.2			7,517,611			30.5			5,745,169			26.8			4,574,364			23.5			3,365,742			20.4
Real estate — mortgage		3,875,451			14.7			3,595,798			14.6			3,392,989			15.9			3,315,863			17.0			2,676,063			16.2
Total commercial		22,547,383			85.1			21,042,341			85.3			18,091,226			84.5			16,354,411			84.0			13,705,760			83.2
Retail:
Real estate — mortgage		3,211,625			12.1			2,881,880			11.8			2,559,339			12.0			2,298,681			11.8			1,865,700			11.4
Retail loans — credit card		291,149			1.1			276,269			1.1			268,348			1.3			256,298			1.3			232,931			1.4
Retail loans — other		494,591			1.9			500,757			2.0			521,521			2.4			612,957			3.1			691,557			4.2
Total retail		3,997,365			15.1			3,658,906			14.9			3,349,208			15.7			3,167,936			16.2			2,790,188			17.0
Total loans		26,544,748						24,701,247						21,440,434						19,522,347						16,495,948
Unearned income		(46,163	)		(0.2	)		(46,695	)		(0.2	)		(48,087	)		(0.2	)		(41,951	)		(0.2	)		(31,034	)		(0.2	)
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	26,498,585			100.0			24,654,552			100.0			21,392,347			100.0			19,480,396			100.0			16,464,914			100.0

*  Loan balance in each category, expressed as a percentage of total loans, net of unearned income.

F-60

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 11  Loan Maturity and Interest Rate Sensitivity

(In thousands)

	December 31,
	2007
			Over One Year		Over
	One Year		Through Five		Five
	Or Less		Years		Years		Total
Selected loan categories:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	3,909,524		2,185,545		329,431		6,424,500
Real estate-construction		6,178,964		1,711,637		117,194		8,007,795
Total	$	10,088,488		3,897,182		446,625		14,432,295
Loans due after one year:
Having predetermined interest rates							$	1,874,112
Having floating or adjustable interest rates								2,469,695
Total							$	4,343,807

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

Despite credit standards, internal controls, and a continuous loan review process, the inherent risk in the lending process results in periodic charge-offs. The provision for losses on loans is the charge to operating earnings necessary to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. Through the provision for loan losses, Synovus maintains an allowance for losses on loans that management believes is adequate to absorb probable losses within the loan portfolio. However, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions, as well as changes in assumptions regarding a borrower’s ability to pay and/or collateral values. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination procedures, periodically review each banks allowance for loan losses. Based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, such agencies may require the banks to recognize additions to their allowance for loan losses.

Allowance for Loan Losses Methodology

During the second quarter of 2007, Synovus implemented certain refinements to its allowance for loan losses methodology, specifically the way that loss factors are derived. These refinements resulted in a reallocation of the factors used to determine the allocated and unallocated components of the allowance along with a more disaggregated approach to estimate the required allowance by loan portfolio classification. These changes did not have a significant impact on the total allowance for loan losses or provision for losses on loans upon implementation.

To determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, a formal analysis is completed quarterly to assess the probable loss within the loan portfolio. This assessment, conducted by lending officers and each bank’s loan administration department, as well as an independent holding company credit review function, includes analyses of historical performance, past due trends, the level of nonperforming loans, reviews of certain impaired loans, loan activity since the previous quarter, consideration of current economic conditions, and other pertinent information. Each loan is assigned a rating, either individually or as part of a homogeneous pool, based on an internally developed risk rating system. The resulting conclusions are reviewed and approved by senior management.

The allowance for loan losses consists of two components: the allocated and unallocated allowances. Both components of the allowance are available to cover inherent losses in the portfolio. The allocated component of the allowance is determined by type of loan within the commercial and retail portfolios. The allocated allowance for commercial loans includes an allowance for impaired loans which is determined as described in the following paragraph. Additionally, the allowance for commercial loans includes an allowance for non-impaired loans which is based on application of loss reserve factors to the components of the portfolio based on the assigned loan grades. The allocated allowance for retail loans is generally determined on pools of homogeneous loan categories. Loss percentage factors are based on the probable loss including qualitative factors. The probable loss considers the probability of default, the loss given default, and certain qualitative factors as determined by loan category and loan grade. The probability of default and loss given default are based on industry data. The qualitative factors consider credit concentrations, recent levels and trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, and growth in the portfolio. The occurrence of certain events could result in changes to the loss factors.

F-61

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Accordingly, these loss factors are reviewed periodically and modified as necessary. The unallocated component of the allowance is established for losses that specifically exist in the remainder of the portfolio, but have yet to be identified. The unallocated component also compensates for the uncertainty in estimating loan losses. The unallocated component of the allowance is based upon economic factors, changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff, and changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards. Certain macro-economic factors and changes in business conditions and developments could have a material impact on the collectibility of the overall portfolio.

Considering current information and events regarding the borrowers’ ability to repay their obligations, management considers a loan to be impaired when the ultimate collectibility of all principal and interest amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, is in doubt. When a loan becomes impaired, management calculates the impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. If the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the collateral is used to measure the amount of impairment. The amount of impairment and any subsequent changes are recorded through a charge to earnings, as an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. When management considers a loan, or a portion thereof, as uncollectible, it is charged against the allowance for loan losses. A majority of Synovus’ impaired loans are collateral dependent. Accordingly, Synovus has determined the impairment on these loans based upon fair value estimates (net of selling costs) of the respective collateral. Any deficiency of the collateral coverage is charged against the allowance. The required allowance (or the actual losses) on these impaired loans could differ significantly if the ultimate fair value of the collateral is significantly different from the fair value estimates used by Synovus in estimating such potential losses.

A summary by loan category of loans charged off, recoveries of loans previously charged off, and additions to the allowance through provision expense is presented in Table 12.

Total net charge-offs were $117.1 million or .46% of average loans for 2007 compared to $60.2 million or .26% for 2006. Commercial real estate construction and mortgage represented $72.2 million or 61.7% of total net charge offs for 2007. Net charge offs in these categories also increased by $64.4 million from 2006 levels, representing more than the total increase of $56.8 million in consolidated net charge offs for the year. The West Florida market (which includes Synovus banks in Pensacola, Valparaiso, Tampa Bay and Naples) and Atlanta market represented $41.1 million and $17.3 million, respectively, of the total real estate construction and mortgage net charge-offs for 2007. Retail real estate mortgage net charge-offs were $6.1 million in 2007 compared to $3.1 million in 2006.

Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses

As noted previously, during 2007 Synovus implemented certain refinements to its allowance for loan losses methodology, specifically the way that loss factors are derived. These refinements resulted in a reallocation of the factors used to determine the allocated and unallocated components of the allowance along with a more disaggregated approach to estimate the required allowance by loan portfolio classification. While these changes did not have a significant impact on the total allowance for loan losses or provision for losses on loans, the changes did impact the amounts allocated to each component of the portfolio.

Table 13 shows a five year comparison of the allocation of the allowance for loan losses. The allocation of the allowance for loan losses is based on several essential loss factors which could differ from the specific amounts or loan categories in which charge-offs may ultimately occur.

Commercial, financial and agricultural loans had an allocated allowance of $94.7 million or 1.5% of loans in the respective category at December 31, 2007, compared to $74.6 million or 1.3% at December 31, 2006. The increase in the allocated allowance is due to loan growth of 9.4% from the previous year-end, negative credit migration, and reallocation of loss factors as a result of the methodology refinement.

At December 31, 2007, the allocated component of the allowance for loan losses related to commercial real estate construction loans was $116.8 million, up 58.3% from $73.8 million in 2006. As a percentage of commercial real estate construction loans, the allocated allowance in this category was 1.5% at December 31, 2007, compared to .98% the previous year-end. The increase is primarily due to negative credit migration in the 1-4 family construction and residential development portfolios within the Atlanta and West Florida markets.

The unallocated allowance is .14% of total loans and 10.3% of the total allowance at December 31, 2007. This compares to .26% of total loans and 20.0% of the total allowance at December 31, 2006. The decrease in the unallocated allowance during 2007 is primarily due to the aforementioned refinements to the allowance for loan losses methodology implemented during 2007. These refinements resulted in a reallocation of the factors used to determine the allocated and unallocated components of the allowance. Management believes that this level of unallocated allowance is adequate to provide for probable losses that are inherent in the loan portfolio and that have not been fully provided through the allocated allowance. Factors considered in determining the adequacy of the unallocated allowance include economic factors, changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff, and changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards.

F-62

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 12 Allowance for Loan Losses

(Dollars in thousands)

	December 31,
	2007			2006		2005		2004		2003
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of year	$	314,459			289,612		265,745		226,059		199,841
Allowance for loan losses of acquired/divested subsidiaries, net		—			9,915		—		5,615		10,534
Loans charged off:
Commercial:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		35,443			44,676		38,087		30,697		37,535
Owner occupied		1,347			2,695		2,603		613		205
Real estate — construction		61,055			3,899		1,367		383		2,918
Real estate — mortgage		13,318			4,795		3,972		2,532		2,328
Total commercial		111,163			56,065		46,029		34,225		42,986
Retail:
Real estate — mortgage		6,964			3,604		4,393		2,327		2,972
Retail loans — credit card		8,172			8,270		11,383		7,728		7,631
Retail loans — other		4,910			4,867		5,421		6,688		10,616
Total retail		20,046			16,741		21,197		16,743		21,219
Total loans charged off		131,209			72,806		67,226		50,968		64,205
Recoveries on loans previously charged off:
Commercial:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		7,735			7,304		3,890		5,334		3,454
Owner occupied		119			185		331		712		167
Real estate — construction		1,713			132		50		172		189
Real estate — mortgage		471			729		152		114		158
Total commercial		10,038			8,350		4,423		6,332		3,968
Retail:
Real estate — mortgage		894			527		511		521		330
Retail loans — credit card		1,669			2,130		1,828		1,612		1,467
Retail loans — other		1,553			1,583		1,799		1,255		2,347
Total retail		4,116			4,240		4,138		3,388		4,144
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		14,154			12,590		8,561		9,720		8,112
Net loans charged off		117,054			60,216		58,665		41,248		56,093
Provision expense		170,208			75,148		82,532		75,319		71,777
Allowance for loan losses at end of year	$	367,613			314,459		289,612		265,745		226,059
Allowance for loan losses to loans, net of unearned income		1.39	%		1.28		1.35		1.36		1.37
Ratio of net loans charged off to average loans outstanding, net of unearned income		0.46	%		0.26		0.29		0.23		0.36

F-63

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 13  Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses

(Dollars in thousands)

	December 31,
	2007					2006					2005					2004					2003
	Amount		% *			Amount		% *			Amount		% *			Amount		% *			Amount		% *
Commercial:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	94,741		24.2			74,649		23.8			83,995		24.6			77,293		25.9			66,418		28.1
Owner occupied		29,852		16.0			38,712		16.4			34,000		17.2			22,609		17.4			18,452		18.3
Real estate — construction		116,791		30.2			73,799		30.5			55,095		26.8			47,596		23.5			37,450		20.4
Real estate — mortgage		41,737		14.7			40,283		14.6			40,108		15.9			46,973		17.1			35,159		16.3
Total commercial		283,121		85.1			227,443		85.3			213,198		84.5			194,471		83.9			157,479		83.1
Retail:
Real estate — mortgage		27,817		12.1			6,625		11.8			6,445		12.0			5,335		11.8			4,032		11.3
Retail loans — credit card		10,900		1.1			8,252		1.1			8,733		1.3			8,054		1.4			7,602		1.5
Retail loans — other		8,017		1.9			9,237		2.0			8,403		2.4			7,086		3.1			8,006		4.3
Total retail		46,734		15.1			24,114		14.9			23,581		15.7			20,475		16.3			19,640		17.1
Unearned income				(0.2	)				(0.2	)				(0.2	)				(0.2	)				(0.2	)
Unallocated		37,758					62,902		52,833					50,799					48,940
Total allowance for loan losses	$	367,613		100.0			314,459		100.0			289,612		100.0			265,745		100.0			226,059		100.0

*  Loan balance in each category expressed as a percentage of total loans, net of unearned income.

Nonperforming Assets and Past Due Loans

Nonperforming assets consist of loans classified as non-accrual or restructured, and real estate acquired through foreclosure. Accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when reasonable doubt exists as to the full collection of interest or principal, or when they become contractually in default for 90 days or more as to either interest or principal, unless they are both well-secured and in the process of collection. Non-accrual loans consist of those loans on which recognition of interest income has been discontinued. Loans may be restructured as to rate, maturity, or other terms as determined on an individual credit basis. Demand and time loans, whether secured or unsecured, are generally placed on non-accrual status when principal and/or interest is 90 days or more past due, or earlier if it is known or expected that the collection of all principal and/or interest is unlikely. Loans past due 90 days or more, which based on a determination of collectibility are accruing interest, are classified as past due loans. Non-accrual loans are reduced by the direct application of interest and principal payments to loan principal, for accounting purposes only.

Nonperforming assets increased $321 million to $443.6 million at December 31, 2007 compared to year-end 2006. The nonperforming assets as a percentage of loans ratio increased to 1.67% as of December 31, 2007 compared to .50% as of year-end 2006. The increase in nonperforming assets was driven by residential real estate. Total nonperforming loans increased $245.5 million or 254% over year end 2006. 1-4 family property loans represent 64.1% of total nonperforming loans at December 31, 2007. Additionally, land acquisition loans represent 10.4% of total nonperforming loans at December 31, 2007. Nonperforming loans within the 1-4 family property and land acquisition portfolio sectors are concentrated in the Atlanta and West Florida markets, which together represent 70.3% of total nonperforming loans at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, nonperforming loans in the West Florida market totaled $129.5 million while nonperforming loans in the Atlanta market totaled $111.2 million. West Florida and Atlanta represent 30.8% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2007.

Due to deterioration in the 1-4 family construction and residential development portfolio sectors, Synovus is

F-64

Financial Review ­ ­ 

responding by increasing special asset resources and regional credit support. These resources are actively working through market issues that are occurring, primarily in the Atlanta and West Florida markets.

Other real estate totaled $101.5 million at December 31, 2007, which represented a $75.6 million increase over year end 2006. Residential real estate represented $83.1 million of the total. The Atlanta and West Florida markets represented $70.0 million of other real estate at December 31, 2007.

As a percentage of total loans outstanding, loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest were .13% at December 31, 2007. This compares to .14% at year-end 2006. These loans are in the process of collection, and management believes that sufficient collateral value securing these loans exists to cover contractual interest and principal payments.

Management continuously monitors non-performing and past due loans, to prevent further deterioration regarding the condition of these loans. Management believes non-performing loans and past due loans over 90 days and still accruing include all material loans where known information about possible credit problems of borrowers causes management to have serious doubts as to the collectibility of amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.

Table 14  Nonperforming Assets and Past Due Loans

(Dollars in thousands)

	December 31,
	2007			2006		2005		2004		2003
Nonperforming loans	$	342,082			96,622		82,175		80,456		67,442
Other real estate		101,487			25,923		16,500		21,492		28,422
Nonperforming assets	$	443,569			122,545		98,675		101,948		95,864
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest total outstanding	$	33,663			34,495		16,023		18,138		21,138
As a % of loans		0.13	%		0.14		0.07		0.09		0.13
Allowance for loan losses	$	367,613			314,459		289,612		265,745		226,059
Allowance for loan losses as a % of loans		1.39	%		1.28		1.35		1.36		1.37
As a % of loans and other real estate:
Nonperforming loans		1.29	%		0.39		0.38		0.41		0.41
Other real estate		0.38	%		0.11		0.08		0.11		0.17
Nonperforming assets		1.67	%		0.50		0.46		0.52		0.58
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans		107.46	%		325.45		352.43		330.30		335.19

Interest income on non-performing loans outstanding on December 31, 2007, that would have been recorded if the loans had been current and performed in accordance with their original terms was $32.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Interest income recorded on these loans for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $19.9 million.

F-65

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 15

	December 31, 2007						December 31, 2006
				Nonperforming						Nonperforming
	Loans as a			Loans as a			Loans as a			Loans as a
	Percentage			Percentage			Percentage			Percentage
	of Total			of Total			of Total			of Total
	Loans			Nonperforming			Loans			Nonperforming
Loan Type	Outstanding			Loans			Outstanding			Loans
Commercial Real Estate
Multi-family		1.8	%		0.5			2.0	%		0.2
Hotels		2.3			0.0			2.6			1.3
Office buildings		3.6			1.8			3.6			4.5
Shopping centers		3.2			0.2			3.1			—
Commercial development		3.6			2.3			3.6			—
Other investment property		2.6			1.3			1.8			0.1
Total Investment Properties		17.1			6.1			16.7			6.1
1-4 family construction		8.4			30.8			9.5			5.8
1-4 family perm/mini-perm		4.8			10.0			4.8			8.0
Residential development		8.7			23.3			8.3			2.0
Total 1-4 Family Properties		21.9			64.1			22.6			15.8
Land Acquisition		5.8			10.4			5.7			8.7
Total Commercial Real Estate		44.8			80.6			45.0			30.6
Commercial, Financial, Agricultural		24.3			12.2			23.8			43.3
Owner-Occupied		16.0			3.6			16.5			16.0
Total Commercial and Industrial Loans		40.3			15.8			40.3			59.3
Home Equity		5.8			1.1			5.5			3.5
Consumer Mortgages		6.3			2.0			6.2			4.6
Credit Card		1.1			—			1.1			—
Other Retail Loans		1.9			0.5			2.1			2.0
Total Retail		15.1			3.6			14.9			10.1
Unearned Income		(0.2	)		—			(0.2	)		—
Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0

Table 15 shows the composition of the loan portfolio and nonperforming loans classified by loan type as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. The commercial real estate category is further segmented into the various property types determined in accordance with the purpose of the loan. Commercial real estate represents 44.8% of total loans and is diversified among many property types. These include commercial investment properties, 1-4 family properties, and land acquisition. Commercial investment properties, as shown in Table 15, represent 17.1% of total loans and 38% of total commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2007. No category of commercial investment properties exceeds 5% of the total loan portfolio. The greatest concentration in commercial real estate is 1-4 family properties, which include 1-4 family construction, commercial 1-4 family mortgages, and residential development loans. These properties are further diversified geographically; approximately 29% of 1-4 family property loans are secured by properties in the Atlanta market and approximately 12.9% are secured by properties in coastal markets. Land acquisition represents less than 6% of total loans.

F-66

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Deposits

Deposits provide the most significant funding source for interest earning assets. Table 16 shows the relative composition of average deposits for 2007, 2006, and 2005. Refer to Table 17 for the maturity distribution of time deposits of $100,000 or more. These larger deposits represented 29.5% and 28.9% of total deposits at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Synovus continues to maintain a strong base of large denomination time deposits from customers within the local market areas of subsidiary banks. Synovus also utilizes national market brokered time deposits as a funding source while continuing to maintain and grow its local market large denomination time deposit base. Time deposits over $100,000 at December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 were $7.35 billion, $7.10 billion, and $5.24 billion, respectively. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, on these large denomination deposits was $364.2 million, $299.7 million, and $171.7 million, respectively.

In 2007, Synovus continued to focus on growing in-market core deposits, particularly money market interest bearing and non-interest bearing demand deposits, with the objective of diversifying the composition of deposits and reducing reliance on wholesale funding. Core deposits (total deposits excluding brokered time deposits) grew 0.7% from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007. Core deposit growth for the year was primarily in money market and interest bearing demand deposit accounts. This growth was partially offset by the run-off of higher priced certificates of deposit. From December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006, core deposits grew 16.2%, and grew 12.2% during the same period excluding the impact of acquisitions and brokered time deposits.

Average deposits increased $2.04 billion or 9.0%, to $24.82 billion in 2007 from $22.78 billion in 2006. Average interest bearing deposits, which include interest bearing demand deposits, money market accounts, savings deposits, and time deposits, increased $2.15 billion or 11.2% from 2006. Average non-interest bearing demand deposits decreased $108.8 million or 3.1% during 2007. Average interest bearing deposits increased $3.05 billion or 18.8% from 2005 to 2006, while average non-interest bearing demand deposits increased $102.26 million, or 3.0%. See Table 4 for further information on average deposits, including average rates paid in 2007, 2006, and 2005.

Table 16   Average Deposits

(Dollars in thousands)	2007		% *		2006		% *		2005		% *
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	$	3,409,506		13.7		3,518,312		15.4		3,416,053		17.4
Interest bearing demand deposits		3,125,802		12.6		3,006,308		13.2		2,975,016		15.2
Money market accounts		7,714,360		31.1		6,515,079		28.6		5,203,104		26.5
Savings deposits		483,368		1.9		542,793		2.4		555,205		2.8
Time deposits under $100,000		2,940,919		11.9		2,791,759		12.3		2,294,158		11.7
Time deposits $100,000 and over		4,063,428		16.4		3,549,200		15.6		2,624,623		13.4
		21,737,383		87.6		19,923,451		87.5		17,068,159		87.0
Brokered time deposits ($100,000 and over)		3,084,006		12.4		2,855,191		12.5		2,557,660		13.0
Total average deposits	$	24,821,389		100.0		22,778,642		100.0		19,625,819		100.0
* Average deposits balance in each category expressed as percentage of total average deposits.

F-67

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 17   Maturity Distribution of Time Deposits of $100,000 or More

(In thousands)	December 31, 2007
3 months or less	$	2,473,842
Over 3 months through 6 months		2,370,033
Over 6 months through 12 months		1,597,767
Over 12 months		914,823
Total outstanding	$	7,356,465

Market Risk And Interest Rate Sensitivity

Market risk reflects the risk of economic loss resulting from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. This risk of loss can be reflected in either diminished current market values or reduced current and potential net income. Synovus’ most significant market risk is interest rate risk. This risk arises primarily from Synovus’ core community banking activities of extending loans and accepting deposits.

Managing interest rate risk is a primary goal of the asset liability management function. Synovus attempts to achieve consistent growth in net interest income while limiting volatility arising from changes in interest rates. Synovus seeks to accomplish this goal by balancing the maturity and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities along with the selective use of derivative instruments. Synovus manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through policies established by its Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) and approved by the Board of Directors. ALCO meets periodically and has responsibility for developing asset liability management policies, reviewing the interest rate sensitivity of the Company, and developing and implementing strategies to improve balance sheet structure and interest rate risk positioning.

Simulation modeling is the primary tool used by Synovus to measure its interest rate sensitivity. On at least a quarterly basis, the following twenty-four month time period is simulated to determine a baseline net interest income forecast and the sensitivity of this forecast to changes in interest rates. The baseline forecast assumes an unchanged or flat interest rate environment. These simulations include all of our earning assets, liabilities and derivative instruments. Forecasted balance sheet changes, primarily reflecting loan and deposit growth expectations, are included in the periods modeled. Projected rates for new loans and deposits are based on management’s outlook and local market conditions.

The magnitude and velocity of rate changes among the various asset and liability groups exhibit different characteristics for each possible interest rate scenario; additionally, customer loan and deposit preferences can vary in response to changing interest rates. Simulation modeling enables Synovus to capture the effect of these differences. Synovus is also able to model expected changes in the shape of interest rate yield curves for each rate scenario. Simulation also enables Synovus to capture the effect of expected prepayment level changes on selected assets and liabilities subject to prepayment.

Synovus entered 2007 with a neutral to moderately asset sensitive interest rate risk positioning. Asset sensitivity was generally limited to significant interest rate movements of 200 basis points or more. This positioning would be expected to result in an increase in net interest income in a rising interest rate environment and a decrease in net interest income in a declining rate environment. During 2007 Synovus maintained a relatively neutral interest rate risk position. The year-end 2007 position indicates a moderately asset sensitive position, primarily in significantly declining rate scenarios. This position is due to the lower current level of interest rates and their impact on the ability to reduce rates on low cost deposits due to implied floors on these deposit rates. An expectation of higher prepayment levels on fixed rate assets also contributes to this asset sensitive position.

Synovus’ rate sensitivity position is indicated by selected results of net interest income simulations. In these simulations, Synovus has modeled the impact of a gradual increase and decrease in short-term interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points to determine the sensitivity of net interest income for the next twelve months. As illustrated in Table 18, the net interest income sensitivity model indicates that, compared with a net interest income forecast assuming stable rates, net interest income is projected to decrease by 0.1% and increase by 1.5% if interest rates increased by 100 and 200 basis points, respectively, and decrease by 1.5% and 2.7% if interest rates decreased by 100 and 200 basis points, respectively. These changes were within Synovus’ policy limit of a maximum 5% negative change.

The actual realized change in net interest income would depend on several factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, actual realized growth in asset and liability volumes, as well as the mix experienced over these time horizons. Market conditions and their resulting impact on loan, deposit, and wholesale funding pricing would also be a primary determinant in the realized level of net interest income.

Synovus is also subject to market risk in certain of its fee income business lines. Financial management services revenues, which include trust, brokerage, and financial planning fees, can be affected by risk in the securities markets, primarily

F-68

Financial Review ­ ­ 

the equity securities market. A significant portion of the fees in this unit are determined based upon a percentage of asset values. Weaker securities markets and lower equity values could have an adverse impact on the fees generated by these operations. Mortgage banking income is also subject to market risk. Mortgage loan originations are sensitive to levels of mortgage interest rates and therefore, mortgage revenue could be negatively impacted during a period of rising interest rates. The extension of commitments to customers to fund mortgage loans also subjects Synovus to market risk. This risk is primarily created by the time period between making the commitment and closing and delivering the loan. Synovus seeks to minimize this exposure by utilizing various risk management tools, the primary of which are forward sales commitments and best efforts commitments.

Table 18  Twelve Month Net Interest Income Sensitivity

Change in	Estimated change in Net Interest Income
Short-Term	As of	As of
Interest Rates	December 31,	December 31,
(In basis points)	2007	2006
+ 200	1.5%	2.5%
+ 100	(0.1)%	0.3%
Flat	—	—
- 100	(1.5)%	(1.0)%
- 200	(2.7)%	(2.7)%

Derivative Instruments for Interest Rate Risk Management

As part of its overall interest rate risk management activities, Synovus utilizes derivative instruments to manage its exposure to various types of interest rate risks. The primary instruments utilized by Synovus are interest rate swaps where Synovus receives a fixed rate of interest and pays a floating rate tied to either the prime rate or LIBOR. These swaps are utilized to hedge the variability of cash flows or fair values of on-balance sheet assets and liabilities.

Interest rate derivative contracts utilized by Synovus include end-user hedges, all of which are designated as hedging specific assets or liabilities. These hedges are executed and managed in coordination with the overall interest rate risk management function. Management believes that the utilization of these instruments provides greater financial flexibility and efficiency in managing interest rate risk.

The notional amount of interest rate swap contracts utilized by Synovus as part of its overall interest rate risk management activities as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $2.76 billion and $2.78 billion, respectively. The notional amounts represent the amount on which calculations of interest payments to be exchanged are based.

Entering into interest rate derivatives contracts potentially exposes Synovus to the risk of counterparties’ failure to fulfill their legal obligations including, but not limited to, potential amounts due or payable under each derivative contract. This credit risk is normally a small percentage of the notional amount and fluctuates based on changes in interest rates. Synovus analyzes and approves credit risk for all potential derivative counterparties prior to execution of any derivative transaction. Synovus minimizes credit risk by dealing with highly-rated counterparties, and by obtaining collateralization for exposures above certain predetermined limits.

A summary of these interest rate contracts and their terms at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is shown in Table 19. The fair value (net unrealized gains and losses) of these contracts has been recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.

During 2007, a total of $1.8 billion in notional amounts of interest rate contracts matured and $185 million were terminated. A total notional amount of $270 million matured in 2006 and $50 million were terminated. Interest rate contracts contributed additional net interest expense of $4.2 million and a one basis point decrease in the net interest margin for 2007. For 2006, interest rate contracts contributed an increase in net interest expense of $8.0 million and a three basis point decrease to the net interest margin.

F-69

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 19  Interest Rate Contracts

			Weighted			Weighted			Weighted							Net
			Average			Average			Average							Unrealized
	Notional		Receive			Pay			Maturity		Unrealized		Unrealized			Gains
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Rate			Rate *			In Months		Gains		Losses			(Losses)
December 31, 2007
Receive fixed swaps:
Fair value hedges	$	1,957,500		4.97	%		4.87	%		25	$	20,349		(2,268	)		18,081
Cash flow hedges		800,000		8.06	%		7.25	%		34		32,340		—			32,340
Total	$	2,757,500		5.87	%		5.56	%		28	$	52,689		(2,268	)		50,421
December 31, 2006
Receive fixed swaps:
Fair value hedges	$	2,082,500		4.91	%		5.11	%		31	$	32,686		(14,787	)		17,899
Cash flow hedges		700,000		7.91	%		8.25	%		38		4,265		(2,253	)		2,012
Total	$	2,782,500		5.66	%		5.90	%		32	$	36,951		(17,040	)		19,911
* Variable pay rate based upon contract rates in effect at December 31, 2007 and 2006

Liquidity

Liquidity represents the availability of funding to meet the needs of depositors, borrowers, and creditors at a reasonable cost, on a timely basis, and without adverse consequences. Synovus’ strong capital position, solid core deposit base, and excellent credit ratings are the cornerstones of its liquidity management activities.

The Synovus Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO), operating under liquidity and funding policies approved by the Board of Directors, actively analyzes and manages the liquidity position in coordination with the subsidiary banks. These subsidiaries maintain liquidity in the form of cash, investment securities, and cash derived from prepayments and maturities of both their investment and loan portfolios. Liquidity is also enhanced by the acquisition of new deposits. The subsidiary banks monitor deposit flows and evaluate alternate pricing structures to retain and grow deposits. Liquidity is also enhanced by the subsidiary banks’ strong reputation in the national deposit markets. This reputation allows subsidiary banks to issue longer-term certificates of deposit across a broad geographic base to enhance their liquidity and funding positions. An additional liquidity source for selected Synovus subsidiary banks is available through their membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank System. At year-end 2007, most Synovus affiliate banks had access to incremental funding, subject to available collateral and Federal Home Loan Bank credit policies, through utilization of Federal Home Loan Bank advances.

Certain Synovus subsidiary banks have access to overnight federal funds lines with various financial institutions. These lines allow Synovus banks to meet immediate liquidity needs if required. These lines total approximately $3.7 billion and are extended at the ongoing discretion of the correspondent financial institutions. Synovus’ strong credit rating is a primary determinant in the continued availability of these lines. Should Synovus’ credit rating decline to a level below investment grade, these lines’ availability would be significantly diminished. For this reason, selected Synovus banks maintain additional sources of liquidity including collateralized borrowing accounts with the Federal Reserve Bank.

The Parent Company requires cash for various operating needs including dividends to shareholders, business combinations, capital infusions into subsidiaries, the servicing of debt, and the payment of general corporate expenses. The primary source of liquidity for the Parent Company is dividends and management fees from the subsidiary banks. As a short-term liquidity source, the Parent Company has access to a $25 million line of credit with an unaffiliated banking organization. Synovus had no borrowings outstanding on this line of credit at December 31, 2007. The Parent Company also enjoys a solid reputation and credit standing in the capital markets and has the ability to raise substantial amounts of funds in the form of either short or long-term borrowings. Maintaining adequate credit ratings is essential to Synovus’ continued cost-effective access to these capital market funding sources.

The consolidated statements of cash flows detail cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities. Net

F-70

Financial Review ­ ­ 

cash provided by operating activities was $665.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, while financing activities provided $2.01 billion. Investing activities used $2.68 billion of these amounts, resulting in a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $3.1 million. Cash of $210.5 million was retained by TSYS as a result of the tax-free spin-off of TSYS to Synovus shareholders on December 31, 2007.

Management is not aware of any trends, events, or uncertainties that will have, or that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on liquidity, capital resources, or operations. Further, management is not aware of any current recommendations by regulatory agencies which, if they were to be implemented, would have such effect. Table 20 sets forth certain information about contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2007.

Table 20  Contractual Cash Obligations

	Payments Due After December 31, 2007
(In thousands)	1 Year or Less		Over 1 - 3 Years		4 - 5 Years		After 5 Years		Total
Long-term debt	$	399,046		637,774		70,500		764,042		1,871,362
Capital lease obligations		333		899		820		5,079		7,131
Operating leases		18,450		33,309		30,640		116,395		198,794
Total contractual cash obligations	$	417,829		671,982		101,960		885,516		2,077,287

Capital Resources

Synovus has always placed great emphasis on maintaining a strong capital base and continues to exceed regulatory capital requirements. Management is committed to maintaining a capital level sufficient to assure shareholders, customers, and regulators that Synovus is financially sound, and to enable Synovus to sustain an appropriate degree of leverage to provide a desirable level of profitability. Synovus has the ability to generate internal capital growth sufficient to support the asset growth it has experienced. Total shareholders’ equity of $3.4 billion represented 10.42% of total assets at December 31, 2007.

As noted in the section titled, Discontinued Operations, Synovus completed the tax-free spin-off of TSYS to Synovus shareholders on December 31, 2007.

The completion of the spin-off resulted in a reduction in total shareholder’s equity at December 31, 2007 of $684.0 million. Accordingly, the decrease in regulatory capital and respective ratios at December 31, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 is primarily due to the decrease in shareholder’s equity resulting from the spin-off.

The regulatory banking agencies use a risk-adjusted calculation to aid them in their determination of capital adequacy by weighting assets based on the credit risk associated with on- and off-balance sheet assets. The majority of these risk-weighted assets for Synovus are on-balance sheet assets in the form of loans. Approximately 12.5% of risk-weighted assets are considered off-balance sheet assets and primarily consist of letters of credit and loan commitments that Synovus enters into in the normal course of business. Capital is categorized into two types: Tier I and Tier II. As a financial holding company, Synovus and its subsidiary banks are required to maintain capital levels required for a well-capitalized institution, as defined in the regulations. The regulatory agencies define a well-capitalized bank as one that has a leverage ratio of at least 5%, a Tier I capital ratio of at least 6%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%. At December 31, 2007, Synovus and all subsidiary banks were in excess of the minimum capital requirements with a consolidated Tier I capital ratio of 9.11% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 12.66%, compared to Tier I and total risk-based capital ratios of 10.87% and 14.43%, respectively, in 2006 as shown in Table 21. The decline in capital and respective capital ratios from 2006 to 2007 was primarily due to the spin-off of TSYS.

In addition to the risk-based capital standards, a minimum leverage ratio of 4% is required for the highest-rated financial holding companies that are not undertaking significant expansion programs. An additional 1% to 2% may be required for other companies, depending upon their regulatory ratings and expansion plans. The leverage ratio is defined as Tier I capital divided by quarterly average assets, net of certain intangibles. Synovus had a leverage ratio of 8.65% at December 31, 2007 and 10.64% at December 31, 2006, significantly exceeding regulatory requirements.

As of February 15, 2008, there were approximately 24,609 shareholders of record of Synovus common stock, some of which are holders in nominee name for the benefit of a number of different shareholders. Table 22 displays high and low stock price quotations of Synovus common stock which are based on actual transactions.

F-71

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 21 Capital Ratios

	December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2007			2006
Tier I capital:
Shareholders’ equity	$	3,441,590		$	3,708,650
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale		(16,024	)		15,227
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges		(15,415	)		4,410
Disallowed intangibles		(547,278	)		(733,129	)
Disallowed deferred tax assets		(6,862	)		(5,935	)
Other deductions from Tier 1 Capital		(4,464	)		(2,855	)
Deferred tax liability on core deposit premium related to acquisitions		8,776			11,035
Minority interest		—			236,709
Qualifying trust preferred securities		10,235			20,491
Total Tier I capital		2,870,558			3,254,603
Tier II capital:
Qualifying subordinated debt		750,000			750,000
Eligible portion of the allowance for loan losses		367,613			314,459
Total Tier II capital		1,117,613			1,064,459
Total risk-based capital	$	3,988,171		$	4,319,062
Total risk-adjusted assets	$	31,505,022		$	29,930,284
Tier I capital ratio		9.11	%		10.87	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		12.66			14.43
Leverage ratio		8.65			10.64
Regulatory minimums (for well-capitalized status):
Tier I capital ratio		6.00	%		6.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		10.00			10.00
Leverage ratio		5.00			5.00

Market and Stock Price Information

Table 22 presents stock price information for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 based on the closing stock price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

Table 22  Stock Price Information

	High		Low
2007
Quarter ended December 31, 2007	$	28.94		22.54
Quarter ended September 30, 2007		31.47		26.42
Quarter ended June 30, 2007		33.31		30.70
Quarter ended March 31, 2007		33.39		30.61
2006
Quarter ended December 31, 2006	$	30.99		28.99
Quarter ended September 30, 2006		29.73		25.83
Quarter ended June 30, 2006		28.00		25.77
Quarter ended March 31, 2006		28.61		26.51

Dividends

Synovus (and its predecessor companies) has paid cash dividends on its common stock in every year since 1891. Synovus dividend payout ratio was 51.25%, 40.99%, and 44.51%, in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Due to the TSYS spin-off, Synovus intends to adjust its cash dividends so that Synovus’ shareholders who retain their TSYS shares will initially receive, in the aggregate, the same cash dividends per share that existed before the spin-off. As a result, Synovus intends to lower its annual cash dividends per share in 2008 from $0.82 to $0.68 and TSYS intends for its annual dividend per share to remain at $0.28, which translates to an aggregate expected $0.82 dividend per share in 2008 to Synovus shareholders who retain their TSYS shares. Decisions regarding future dividend will be made independently by the Synovus Board of Directors and the TSYS Board of Directors for their respective companies. In addition to the Company’s general financial condition, Synovus’ Board of Directors considers other factors in determining the amount of dividends to be paid each year. These factors include consideration of capital and liquidity needs based on projected balance sheet growth, acquisition activity, earnings growth, as well as the capital position.

Table 23 presents information regarding dividends declared during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

F-72

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Table 23  Dividends

			Per Share
Date Declared	Date Paid		Amount
2007
November 30, 2007		January 2, 2008	$	.2050
September 5, 2007		October 1, 2007		.2050
May 24, 2007		July 2, 2007		.2050
March 8, 2007		April 2, 2007		.2050
2006
November 21, 2006		January 2, 2007	$	.1950
August 15, 2006		October 2, 2006		.1950
May 16, 2006		July 1, 2006		.1950
February 22, 2006		April 1, 2006		.1950

Commitments and Contingencies

Synovus believes it has sufficient capital, liquidity, and future cash flows from operations to meet operating needs over the next year. Table 24 and Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements provide additional information on short-term and long-term borrowings.

Synovus and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the ordinary course of business, Synovus and its subsidiaries are also subject to regulatory examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries and investigations. Synovus establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that Synovus determines to be both probable and reasonably estimable. In the pending regulatory matter described below, loss contingencies are not reasonably estimable in the view of management, and, accordingly, a reserve has not been established for this matter. Based on current knowledge, advice of counsel and available insurance coverage, management does not believe that the eventual outcome of pending litigation and/or regulatory matters, including the pending regulatory matter described below, will have a material adverse effect on Synovus’ consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to Synovus’ results of operations for any particular period.

The FDIC is currently conducting an investigation of the policies, practices and procedures used by Columbus Bank and Trust Company (CB&T), a wholly owned banking subsidiary of Synovus, in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to its Affinity Agreement with CompuCredit Corporation (CompuCredit). CB&T issues credit cards that are marketed and serviced by CompuCredit pursuant to the Affinity Agreement. A provision of the Affinity Agreement generally requires CompuCredit to indemnify CB&T for losses incurred as a result of the failure of credit card programs offered pursuant to the Agreement to comply with applicable law. Synovus is subject to a per event 10% share of any such loss, but Synovus’ 10% payment obligation is limited to a cumulative total of $2 million for all losses incurred.

CB&T is cooperating with the FDIC’s investigation. Synovus cannot predict the eventual outcome of the FDIC’s investigation; however, the investigation has resulted in material changes to CB&T’s policies, practices and procedures in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to the Affinity Agreement. It is likely that the investigation may result in further changes to CB&T’s policies, practices and procedures in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to the Affinity Agreement and the imposition of one or more regulatory sanctions, including a civil money penalty and/or restitution of certain fees to affected cardholders. At this time, management of Synovus does not expect the ultimate resolution of the investigation to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows primarily due to the expected performance by CompuCredit of its indemnification obligations described in the paragraph above.

Synovus is a member of the Visa USA network. On October 2, 2007, the Visa organization of affiliated entities completed a series of restructuring transactions which resulted in the combination of certain of Visa’s affiliated operating companies, including Visa USA into Visa, Inc. Visa’s 2007 restructuring was part of a series of steps toward Visa, Inc.’s planned initial public offering (IPO). Visa, Inc. intends to use the IPO proceeds for a variety of purposes including, but not limited to, redemption of a portion of Visa members’ interests and establishment of an escrow fund for judgments and/or settlements of certain Visa USA related litigation (the “covered litigation”).

As a result of Visa’s reorganization, Synovus exchanged its membership interest in Visa USA for an equity interest in Visa, Inc. The equity interest will initially be comprised of Class USA shares, which are subject to a true-up process based on performance against projections for the trailing four quarters reported in Visa’s final and effective registration statement on Form S-1. Subsequent to the true-up process, Class USA shares will be converted to Class B shares, which will be subject to transfer restrictions until the latter of (a) the third anniversary of the effective date of Visa’s IPO, or (b) the date

F-73

Financial Review ­ ­ 

on which all of Visa’s covered litigation (as defined above) has been resolved.

Synovus has assigned no value to its Visa shares. Should Visa complete its IPO as planned, Synovus will recognize a gain upon the redemption of Class B shares by Visa, and will subsequently recognize a gain upon release from transfer restrictions on the remainder of its Class B shares. The amount and timing of potential gains is not determinable at this time.

Prior to Visa’s October 2, 2007 restructuring, Visa USA members approved Visa’s restructuring plan, including its retrospective responsibility plan, which included confirmation, by Visa USA members, of their obligation under Visa USA bylaws to indemnify Visa, Inc. for potential future settlement of, or judgments resulting from the covered litigation. Synovus’ indemnification obligation is limited to its membership proportion of Visa USA. On November 7, 2007, Visa announced the settlement of its American Express litigation, and disclosed in its annual report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 that Visa had accrued a contingent liability for the estimated settlement of its Discover litigation. Accordingly, during 2007, Synovus has recognized a contingent liability in the amount of $36.8 million as an estimate for its membership proportion of the American Express settlement and the potential Discover settlement, as well as its membership proportion of the amount that Synovus estimates will be required for Visa to settle the remaining covered litigation. The timing for ultimate settlement of all covered litigation is not determinable at this time.

Short-Term Borrowings

The following table sets forth certain information regarding federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, the principal components of short-term borrowings.

Table 24  Short-Term Borrowings

(Dollars in thousands)	2007			2006			2005
Balance at December 31	$	2,319,412			1,582,487			1,300,379
Weighted average interest rate at December 31		3.81	%		4.97	%		3.76	%
Maximum month end balance during the year	$	2,767,055			1,986,919			2,026,224
Average amount outstanding during the year	$	1,957,990			1,578,163			1,197,342
Weighted average interest rate during the year		4.75	%		4.62	%		2.87	%

Income Tax Expense

Income taxes based on income from continuing operations were $184.7 million in 2007, down from $230.4 million in 2006, and $204.3 million in 2005. The effective income tax rate was 35.0%, 35.7%, and 36.3%, in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for a detailed analysis of income taxes.

Synovus files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Synovus’ U.S. Federal income tax return is filed on a consolidated basis. Most state and foreign income tax returns are filed on a separate entity basis. Synovus is no longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations by the IRS for years before 2004, and with few exceptions is no longer subject to income tax examinations from state or foreign authorities for years before 2001.

In the normal course of business, Synovus is subject to examinations from various tax authorities. These examinations may alter the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. During the year ended December 31, 2007, Synovus decreased its liability for prior year uncertain income tax positions by a net amount of approximately $4.1 million (net of the Federal tax effect) including $1.4 million in interest. This decrease resulted from the completion of a routine state tax examination, expiring state audit period statutes and other new information impacting the potential resolution of material uncertain tax positions subsequent to the adoption of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”.

The total liability for uncertain tax positions under FIN 48 at December 31, 2007 is $5.4 million. Synovus is not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time; however, at this time, Synovus does not expect a significant payment related to these obligations within the next year.

Synovus continually monitors and evaluates the potential impact of current events and circumstances on the estimates and assumptions used in the analysis of its income tax positions, and, accordingly, Synovus’ effective tax rate may fluctuate in the future.

Inflation

Inflation has an important impact on the growth of total assets in the banking industry and may create a need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio. Synovus has been able to maintain a high level of equity through retention of an appropriate percentage of its net income. Synovus deals with the effects of inflation by managing its interest rate sensitivity position through its asset/liability management

F-74

Financial Review ­ ­ 

program and by periodically adjusting its pricing of services and banking products to take into consideration current costs.

Parent Company

The Parent Company’s assets, primarily its investment in subsidiaries, are funded, for the most part, by shareholders’ equity. It also utilizes short-term and long-term debt. The Parent Company is responsible for providing the necessary funds to strengthen the capital of its subsidiaries, acquire new businesses, fund internal growth, pay corporate operating expenses, and pay dividends to its shareholders. These operations are funded by dividends and fees received from subsidiaries, and borrowings from outside sources.

In connection with dividend payments to the Parent Company from its subsidiary banks, certain rules and regulations of the various state and federal banking regulatory agencies limit the amount of dividends which may be paid. Approximately $407 million in dividends could be paid in 2008 to the Parent Company from its subsidiary banks without prior regulatory approval. Synovus expects to receive regulatory approval to allow certain subsidiaries to pay dividends in excess of their respective regulatory limits.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth information regarding Synovus’ purchases of its common stock on a monthly basis during the three months ended December 31, 2007:

							Maximum
							Number of
					Total Number of		Shares That
	Total				Shares Purchased		May Yet Be
	Number				as Part of Publicly		Purchased
	of Shares		Average Price		Announced Plans		Under the Plans
Month	Purchased(1)		Paid per Share		or Programs(2)		or Programs
October 2007		—	$	—		—		—
November 2007		213,579		26.44		—		—
December 2007		254,222		25.67		—		—
Total		467,801	$	26.02		—		—

(1)	Consists of delivery of previously owned shares to Synovus in payment of the exercise price of stock options.
(2)	Synovus does not currently have a publicly announced share repurchase plan in place.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement does not introduce any new requirements mandating the use of fair value; rather, it unifies the meaning of fair value and adds additional fair value disclosures. The provisions of this statement are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. As permitted under FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Synovus has elected to defer the application of SFAS No. 157 to non-financial assets and liabilities until January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on Synovus’ financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to make an irrevocable election, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. As of January 1, 2008, Synovus has elected the fair value option for mortgage loans held for sale and hedged callable brokered certificates of deposit. This statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The provisions of this statement are effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. SFAS No. 159 will not have a material impact on Synovus’ financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (EITF 06-04). EITF 06-4 requires an employer to recognize a liability for future benefits based on the substantive agreement with the employee. EITF 06-4 requires a company to use the guidance prescribed in FASB Statement No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 12, “Omnibus Opinion,” when entering into an endorsement split-dollar life insurance agreement and recognizing the liability. EITF 06-4 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2007. Synovus does not expect the impact of EITF 06-4 on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows to be material.

In November 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-10, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (EITF 06-10). Under EITF 06-10, an employer should recognize a liability for the postretirement benefit related to a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement. The recognition of an asset should be based on the nature and substance of the collateral, as well as the terms of the arrangement such as (1) future cash flows to which the employer is entitled and (2) employee’s obligation (and ability) to repay the employer. EITF 06-10 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2007.

F-75

Financial Review ­ ­ 

Synovus does not expect the impact of EITF 06-10 on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows to be material.

In November 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-based Payment Awards” (EITF 06-11). Employees may receive dividend payments (or the equivalent of) on vested and non-vested share-based payment awards. Under EITF 06-11, the Task Force concluded that a realized income tax benefit from dividends (or dividend equivalents) that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for equity classified nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units, and outstanding equity share options should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital. Once the award is settled, the Company should determine whether the cumulative tax deduction exceeded the cumulative compensation cost recognized on the income statement. If the total tax benefit exceeds the tax effect of the cumulative compensation cost, the excess would be an increase to additional paid-in capital. EITF 06-11 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after September 15, 2007. Synovus does not expect the impact of EITF 06-11 on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows to be material.

In November 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 109, “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings” SAB 109 supercedes SAB 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments.” SAB 109, consistent with SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets,” and SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” requires that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. A separate and distinct servicing asset or liability is not recognized for accounting purposes until the servicing rights have been contractually separated from the underlying loan by sale or securitization of the loan with servicing retained. The provisions of this bulletin are effective for derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. Synovus does not expect the impact of SAB 109 on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows to be material.

In December 2007, the SEC issued SAB 110, “Share-Based Payment.” SAB 110 allows eligible public companies to continue to use a simplified method for estimating the expense of stock options if their own historical experience isn’t sufficient to provide a reasonable basis. Under SAB 107, “Share-Based Payment,” the simplified method was scheduled to expire for all grants made after December 31, 2007. The SAB describes disclosures that should be provided if a company is using the simplified method for all or a portion of its stock option grants beyond December 31, 2007. The provisions of this bulletin are effective on January 1, 2008. Synovus plans to retain use of the simplified method allowed by SAB 110 for determining the expected term component for share options granted during 2008.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141R clarifies the definitions of both a business combination and a business. All business combinations will be accounted for under the acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase method). This standard defines the acquisition date as the only relevant date for recognition and measurement of the fair value of consideration paid. SFAS 141R requires the acquirer to expense all acquisition related costs. SFAS 141R will also require acquired loans to be recorded net of the allowance for loan losses on the date of acquisition. SFAS 141R defines the measurement period as the time after the acquisition date during which the acquirer may make adjustments to the “provisional” amounts recognized at the acquisition date. This period cannot exceed one year, and any subsequent adjustments made to provisional amounts are done retrospectively and restate prior period data. The provisions of this statement are effective for business combinations during fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Synovus has not determined the impact that SFAS 141R will have on its financial position and results of operations and believes that such determination will not be meaningful until Synovus enters into a business combination.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in consolidated financial statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS No. 160 requires noncontrolling interests to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of equity. Disclosure requirements include net income and comprehensive income to be displayed for both the controlling and noncontrolling interests and a separate schedule that shows the effects of any transactions with the noncontrolling interests on the equity attributable to the controlling interest. The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement should be applied prospectively except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Synovus does not expect the impact of SFAS No. 160 on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows to be material.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this document which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (the “Act”). These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements regarding: (i) management’s belief with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; (ii) the expected financial impact of

F-76

Financial Review ­ ­ 

recent accounting pronouncements; (iii) management’s estimate with respect to its indemnification obligation in connection with the Visa covered litigation; (iv) management’s belief with respect to legal proceedings and other claims, including the pending regulatory matter with respect to credit card programs offered by CB&T pursuant to its agreement with CompuCredit; (v) management’s belief with respect to the adequacy of unallocated allowance for loan losses; (vi) management’s belief with respect to the existence of sufficient collateral for past due loans, and the inclusion of all material loans in which serious doubt exists as to collectibility in nonperforming loans and loans past due over 90 days and still accruing; (vii) management’s belief with respect to the use of derivatives to manage interest rate risk; (viii) the Board of Directors’ present intent to continue to pay adjusted cash dividends and the expected initial amount of the aggregated Synovus and TSYS dividend; (ix) management’s belief with respect to having sufficient capital, liquidity, and future cash flows from operations to meet operating needs over the next year; and the assumptions underlying such statements. In addition, certain statements in future filings by Synovus with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of Synovus which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) projections of revenues, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, the payment or non-payment of dividends, capital structure, efficiency ratios and other financial terms; (ii) statements of plans and objectives of Synovus or its management or Board of Directors, including those relating to products or services; (iii) statements of future economic performance; and (iv) statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “targeted,” “estimates,” “projects,” “plans,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.

These statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of Synovus’ management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements in this document. Many of these factors are beyond Synovus’ ability to control or predict. These factors include, but are not limited to: (i) competitive pressures arising from aggressive competition from other financial service providers; (ii) factors that affect the delinquency rate of Synovus’ loans and the rate at which Synovus’ loans are charged off; (iii) changes in the cost and availability of funding due to changes in the deposit market and credit market, or the way in which Synovus is perceived in such markets, including a reduction in our debt ratings; (iv) the strength of the U.S. economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which operations are conducted may be different than expected; (v) the effects of and changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board; (vi) inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; (vii) the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services and perceived overall value of these products and services by users; (viii) changes in consumer spending, borrowing, and saving habits; (ix) technological changes are more difficult or expensive than anticipated; (x) acquisitions are more difficult to integrate than anticipated; (xi) the ability to increase market share and control expenses; (xii) the effect of changes in governmental policy, laws and regulations, or the interpretation or application thereof, including restrictions, limitations and/or penalties arising from banking, securities and insurance laws, regulations and examinations; (xiii) the impact of the application of and/or the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or other authoritative bodies; (xiv) changes in Synovus’ organization, compensation, and benefit plans; (xv) the costs and effects of litigation, investigations or similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto including the FDIC’s investigation of the policies, practices and procedures used by CB&T in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to its Affinity Agreement with CompuCredit; (xvi) a deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit; (xvii) Synovus’ inability to successfully manage any impact from slowing economic conditions or consumer spending; (xviii) successfully managing the potential both for patent protection and patent liability in the context of rapidly developing legal framework for expansive software patent protection; (xix) the impact on Synovus’ business, as well as on the risks set forth above, of various domestic or international military or terrorist activities or conflicts; (xx) the expected benefits associated with the spin-off may not be achieved; (xxi) Synovus’ indemnification obligation in connection with the Visa covered litigation may be greater than expected; and (xxii) the success of Synovus at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which the statements are made, and Synovus undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

F-77

Summary of Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) ­ ­ 

Presented below is a summary of the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

	Fourth		Third		Second		First
(In thousands, except per share data)	Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter
2007
Interest income	$	553,787		572,317		564,492		547,899
Net interest income		286,685		290,839		288,475		282,949
Provision for losses on loans		70,642		58,770		20,281		20,515
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		79,832		125,838		166,864		155,140
Income from continuing operations		53,142		83,577		105,809		100,407
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest		28,717		51,366		56,941		46,346
Net income		81,859		134,943		162,750		146,753
Basic earnings per share
Income from continuing operations		.16		.26		.32		.31
Net income		.25		.41		.50		.45
Diluted earnings per share
Income from continuing operations		.16		.25		.32		.30
Net income		.25		.41		.49		.45
2006
Interest income	$	545,630		533,629		497,713		439,493
Net interest income		288,871		290,755		285,214		260,949
Provision for losses on loans		18,675		18,390		18,534		19,549
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		164,360		170,377		165,283		145,517
Income from continuing operations		104,976		109,983		106,384		93,760
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest		70,571		44,083		46,413		40,746
Net income		175,547		154,066		152,797		134,506
Basic earnings per share
Income from continuing operations		.32		.34		.33		.30
Net income		.54		.48		.47		.43
Diluted earnings per share
Income from continuing operations		.32		.34		.33		.30
Net income		.54		.47		.47		.43

F-78