jcap_Current_Folio

10-K 1 jcap-20181231x10k.htm 10-K jcap_Current_Folio_10K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10‑K


	☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018


	☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001‑36892

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland		47‑1978772
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 650
Memphis, Tennessee		38119
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(901) 567‑9510

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value		New York Stock Exchange
7.00% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10‑K or any amendment to this Form 10‑K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☒
Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2018 the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $350,595,320, based on the closing sales price per share of $19.06 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

On February 28, 2019, the registrant had a total of 20,433,428 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement for the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders scheduled to be held on or about May 1, 2019 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10‑K. The registrant expects to file its Definitive Proxy Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I		4

ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	4
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	21
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	48
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	49
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	49
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	49

PART II		49

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	49
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	53
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	54
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	75
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	77
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	130
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	130
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	130

PART III		130

ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	130
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	131
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	131
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	131
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	131

PART IV		132

ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	132
ITEM 16.	10‑K SUMMARY	132

SIGNATURES		136

Table of Contents

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make statements in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our estimates, expectations, predictions and forecasts of our future business plans and financial and operating performance and/or results, as well as statements of management’s goals and objectives and other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. When we use the words “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” or similar expressions or their negatives, as well as statements in future tense, we intend to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, beliefs and expectations, such forward-looking statements are not predictions of future events or guarantees of future performance, and our actual financial and operating results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Some factors that might cause such differences are described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this report and in other documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which factors include, without limitation, the following:

our ability to successfully source, structure, negotiate and close investments in and acquisitions of self-storage facilities;

changes in our business strategy and the market’s acceptance of our investment terms;

our ability to fund our outstanding and future investment commitments;

our ability to complete construction and obtain certificates of occupancy for self-storage development projects in which we invest;

the future availability for borrowings under our credit facility (including borrowing base capacity and the availability of the accordion feature);

availability, terms and our rate of deployment of equity and debt capital;

our manager’s ability to hire and retain qualified personnel;

changes in the self-storage industry, interest rates or the general economy;

the degree and nature of our competition;

volatility in the value of our assets carried at fair market value;

potential limitations on our ability to pay dividends at historical rates;

limitations in our existing and future debt agreements on our ability to pay distributions;

the impact of our outstanding preferred stock on our ability to execute our business plan and pay distributions on our common stock; and

general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common stock.

Given these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on our forward-looking statements. We assume no duty or responsibility to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement that may be made to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. We urge you to review the disclosures concerning risks in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report and in other documents that we file from time to time with the SEC.

Table of Contents

The following description of the business of Jernigan Capital, Inc. should be read in conjunction with the information included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (“report”). Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to “Jernigan Capital,” “we,” “the Company,” “our” and “us” refer to the activities of and the assets and liabilities of the business and operations of Jernigan Capital, Inc.; “Operating Company” refers to Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and “Manager” refers to JCAP Advisors, LLC, a Florida limited liability company.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

We are a commercial real estate company that invests primarily in new or recently-constructed and opened self-storage facilities located predominately in dense urban submarkets within large United States metropolitan statistical areas (“MSAs”). Facilities in which we invest are largely vertical (three to ten floors), 100% climate controlled and technologically adapted buildings, which we call Generation V facilities. These facilities are located in submarkets with demographic profiles and competitive positions that management believes will support successful lease-up of such facilities and value creation for our stockholders. Our investments include mortgage loans typically coupled with equity interests as well as outright ownership of self-storage facilities.

Our principal business objective is to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns by investing in new Generation V self-storage facilities primarily in urban submarkets. A substantial majority of our investments to date have been first mortgage loans to finance ground-up construction of and conversion of existing buildings into new Generation V self-storage facilities. These investments, which we refer to as “development property investments,” are structured as loans equal to between 90% and 97% of facility costs (including land, pre-development and other “soft” costs, hard construction costs, fees and interest and operating reserves). We receive a fixed rate of interest on loaned amounts and up to a 49.9% interest in the positive cash flows from operations, sales and/or refinancings of self-storage facilities, which we refer to as “Profits Interest”. We also typically receive a right of first refusal (“ROFR”) to acquire the self-storage facility upon sale.

Additionally, in March 2018 we closed a bridge financing investment consisting of five separate loans with an aggregate commitment amount of $83.3 million secured by first mortgages with equity participations and ROFRs on five self-storage properties in the Miami, Florida MSA that are in lease-up. We refer to this investment herein as a “Bridge Investment.” We have also selectively made construction loans and mortgage loans secured by mature operating self-storage facilities.

In addition to the foregoing, we intend to acquire self-storage facilities that we have financed either through the exercise of ROFRs or through privately negotiated transactions with our investment counterparties, subject to acquisition prices being consistent with our investment objective to create long-term value for our stockholders. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we acquired the 50.1% equity interests of our developer partners in the limited liability companies (“LLCs”) that own our Jacksonville 1, Atlanta 1, Atlanta 2, Pittsburgh, Charlotte 1, and New York City 1 development properties. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired the 50.1% equity interests of our developer partner in the LLCs that own our Orlando 1 and Orlando 2 development property investments, which are two self-storage facilities adjacent to each other. We now own 100% of the membership interests in the LLCs that own these seven facilities and fully consolidate these facilities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

We account for our development property investments and bridge investments at fair value, with appreciation and depreciation in the value of these investments being reflected in the carrying value of the assets and in the determination of net income. In determining fair value, we re-value each development property investment and bridge investment each quarter, which re-valuation includes an analysis of the current value of any Profits Interest associated with the investment. We believe that carrying our assets at fair value and reflecting appreciation and depreciation in our earnings provide our stockholders and others who rely on our financial statements with a more complete and accurate understanding of our financial condition and economic performance, including revenues and the creation of value through our Profits Interests as self-storage facilities we finance are constructed, leased-up and become stabilized.

We generally fund our on-balance sheet investments with (i) proceeds from sales of our securities, including sales of our common stock and our 7.00% cumulative redeemable Series B preferred stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”) in follow-on offerings and pursuant to our common stock at-the-market offering program (“ATM Program”) and our Series B Preferred Stock at-the-market offering program (the “Preferred ATM Program”), (ii) funds from secured indebtedness, including borrowings under our $235 million revolving credit facility with KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as lead arranger and the other lenders party thereto (the “Credit Facility”) and term loans on individual properties, and (iii) net

Table of Contents

proceeds from the monetization of existing development property investments. In the past we also have used proceeds from the sale of senior participations and the sale of our Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) between us and funds managed by Highland Capital Management, L.P., pursuant to which we issued $125 million of Series A Preferred Stock.

On March 7, 2016, we, through our Operating Company, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “JV Agreement”) of Storage Lenders LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to form a real estate venture (the “SL1 Venture”) with HVP III Storage Lenders Investor, LLC (“HVP III”), an investment vehicle managed by Heitman Capital Management LLC (“Heitman”). The SL1 Venture was formed for the purpose of providing capital to developers of self-storage facilities identified and underwritten by us. Upon formation, HVP III committed $110.0 million for a 90% interest in the SL1 Venture, and we committed $12.2 million for a 10% interest. On March 31, 2016, we contributed to the SL1 Venture three self-storage development investments with an aggregate commitment amount of $41.9 million. As of December 31, 2018, the SL1 Venture had closed on eight additional development property investments with a Profits Interest with an aggregate commitment amount of approximately $81.4 million, bringing the total aggregate commitment of SL1 Venture’s investments to $123.3 million as of December 31, 2018.

We are externally managed and advised by JCAP Advisors, LLC. The Manager is led by our founder and Executive Chairman, Dean Jernigan, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), John A. Good, and our President and Chief Investment Officer (“CIO”), Jonathan Perry. Mr. Jernigan is a 30‑year veteran of the self-storage industry, including a combined 16 years as the Chief Executive Officer of Storage USA and CubeSmart, both New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listed self-storage REITs. During his time at these two companies, Mr. Jernigan oversaw the investment of several billion dollars of capital in the self-storage industry. Mr. Good has over 30 years of experience working with senior management teams and boards of directors of public companies in the REIT and financial services industries on corporate finance, corporate governance, merger and acquisition, tax, executive compensation, joint venture, and strategic planning projects as a nationally recognized corporate and securities lawyer. Prior to joining the Company, he served as lead counsel on over 200 securities offerings, including our IPO, raising in excess of $25 billion over the past 25 years, with more than 125 of those deals being in the REIT industry. Mr. Perry has over 20 years of experience in the self-storage sector having joined the Company in June 2018 from CubeSmart, where he most recently served as Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Perry has led several billion dollars of self-storage investments and transactions over his career and has established extensive relationships across the industry. We believe the industry experience and depth of relationships of our senior management team and other investment professionals provide us with a significant competitive advantage in sourcing, evaluating, underwriting and servicing self-storage investments.

We are a Maryland corporation that was organized on October 1, 2014 that has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gains, to the extent that we annually distribute all of our REIT taxable income to stockholders and comply with certain other requirements for qualification as a REIT set forth in the Code. We are structured as an UPREIT and conduct our investment activities through our Operating Company. We also intend to operate our business in a manner that will permit us to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“the 1940 Act”).

Investment Strategy

We target investments in self-storage facilities primarily in the top 50 United States MSAs as delineated by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. We believe attractive investment opportunities currently exist in these markets due to:

consistently strong long-term self-storage industry fundamentals;

increased movement (especially by millennials) into smaller dwelling units in larger urban areas, creating additional demand for self-storage units;

increased focus on development and construction of new Generation V self-storage facilities in urban submarkets by entrepreneurial developers who desire to refinance or sell such facilities prior to stabilization; and

reluctance of commercial banks and other capital providers to finance self-storage construction.

We seek to directly originate and structure our target investments utilizing the contacts and self-storage knowledge and experience of our Manager’s personnel, which enables us to: (1) originate broad and adaptable investments that meet the specific needs of our customers and meet our requirements for qualification as a REIT and exclusion from the definition of an investment company under the 1940 Act; (2) have direct access to project developers and enhance our underwriting, structuring and due diligence processes; (3) provide meaningful insight to our customers’ pro forma capital structures, construction budgets, projections and operational decisions; and (4) earn structuring and origination

Table of Contents

fees. We believe that our industry knowledge and direct, active engagement with project developers allow us to better monitor investment performance and reduce the risk of loss of principal on our investments.

From time to time, we purchase developers’ interests in the development properties in which we have co-invested. Generally, our development property investment documents require that self-storage facilities we finance be operated for two years following opening before the developers can market and sell such facilities to third parties; however, during that two-year timeframe, our developer partners may seek to sell their interests to us. At such time, we are free to accept, reject and/or negotiate any such offer. We have not typically initiated these transactions; rather, such a buy-out transaction is usually initiated by the developer. To date, developers of seven projects have sold their interests to us in such privately negotiated transactions.

In addition, we possess a ROFR to purchase the underlying self-storage facility in the majority of our development property investments and all of our bridge investments. Our ROFR is typically triggered when the owner of a self-storage facility obtains from an unrelated third party a firm offer for the purchase of the facility that such owner desires to accept. After receipt of notice of such offer, we typically have 10 to 15 business days to exercise our right to purchase the project at the price and on the terms set forth in the bona fide third party offer. Following our exercise of our ROFR, we typically have a 20 to 30 business day inspection period, and we may cancel our exercise of our ROFR prior to the end of such inspection period. After expiration of the inspection period, we will close the purchase of the self-storage facility. Our out-of-pocket funds to close the purchase of a facility acquired by our exercise of our ROFR will typically be the contract purchase price less mortgage debt and less any Profits Interest we have with respect to the facility. In a situation where we continue to hold the debt on the facility, our out-of-pocket funds to close would typically be approximately equal to the owner’s equity and share of profit on the sale of the facility. We expect to exercise ROFRs to purchase self-storage facilities we have financed, subject to our ability to obtain financing.

The majority of investments we originate are in principal amounts ranging from $5 million to $15 million.

Target Investments

We focus primarily on originating the following types of investments:

Development Property Investments: These investments are intended to finance ground-up construction of self-storage facilities or major self-storage conversion or redevelopment opportunities generally in the top 50 MSAs. These investments are typically funded over a 12 to 30 month period as the developer completes the project. After an initial advance at closing, typically between a nominal amount and 5% to 10% of our committed investment, funding of construction draws typically commences 90 to 120 days following the loan closing, subject to the timing of building permits, which sometimes take up to 180 days or more following closing. Our development investments typically have been structured as first mortgage loans on the development projects, generally with terms of 72 months, interest-only at a fixed interest rate of 6.9% per annum, and provide us with 49.9% Profits Interests in the property-owning entities, entitling us to 49.9% of residual cash flows (including sale and refinancing proceeds after debt repayment). We generally provide between 90% and 97% of the cost to develop and construct new development projects, with cost being inclusive of land acquisition, design and other soft costs, hard costs, a developer’s fee and operating and interest reserves designed to fund the project until it is earning enough cash flow to cover all costs, including interest on our investment. As of December 31, 2018, one of our development property investments totaling $9.3 million of aggregate committed amount was structured as a preferred equity investment which will be subordinate to a first mortgage loan expected to be procured from a third party lender for 60% to 70% of the cost of the project. We may make additional preferred equity investments such as this in the future.

Wholly-Owned Property Investments: In connection with our development property investments and bridge investments, we have typically received ROFRs to acquire the self-storage facilities underlying our investments. Subject to acquisition prices being consistent with our investment objective to create long-term value for our stockholders, we intend to acquire self-storage facilities that we have financed either through the exercise of ROFRs or through privately negotiated transactions with our investment counterparties. Our development property investment documents generally require that the developer operate the facility for two years after it opens for business prior to marketing and selling the property to a third-party; however, during that two-year timeframe, our developer partner may seek to sell its interest in a project to us. In 2017, we acquired the interests of our developer partner in our Orlando 1 and Orlando 2 development property investments, after our developer partner offered to sell us his remaining membership interests in the LLCs that owned the projects. In 2018, we acquired the 50.1% equity interests of our developer partners in our Jacksonville 1, Atlanta 1, Atlanta 2, Pittsburgh, Charlotte 1, and New York City 1 development property investments, after our developer partners offered to sell us their remaining membership interests in the LLCs that owned those projects. Our wholly-owned

Table of Contents

properties are, and we expect that for the foreseeable future they will be, managed by third-party professional managers. See “—Operations Strategy—Property Management and Operations.”

Bridge Investments: These investments are intended to recapitalize existing Generation V facilities that are in lease-up. Proceeds from our bridge investments are for the purpose of repaying existing construction loans, returning equity to capital partners and/or funding operating losses and interest payments during lease-up. Our existing bridge investments (i) are secured by a first mortgage on the financed asset(s); (ii) have terms of 5 to 7 years; (iii) bear interest at fixed rates, with the rate depending on any given bridge investment being determined based on the stage of lease-up of the financed self-storage facility; (iv) contain an equity participation; and (v) are coupled with a ROFR to acquire the financed self-storage facility. Our bridge investments are highly structured transactions designed to meet certain capital needs of the facility or its sponsor; accordingly, future bridge investments may take different forms and structures.

In addition to our primary focus, we occasionally and selectively will originate land loans and credit lines to facilitate a development property investment. These loans are intended for borrowers who are typically seeking short-term capital to be used in an acquisition, refinancing, recapitalization or repositioning of a given facility, portfolio or partnership interest or pursuit of development sites. These loans typically have maturities of three years or less. We will provide land loans only if secured by a first mortgage on a self-storage site that has proper zoning and an acceptable environmental condition and only to borrowers who intend to refinance such land loans with development investments made by us. These loans have been, and we expect them to continue to be, an insignificant part of our business. These loans are accounted for at historical cost and are not subject to fair value adjustments.

The following table summarizes certain targeted characteristics of our development property investment and bridge investment portfolio:

Loan-to-Cost ("LTC")/

Average

Right of

Loan-to-Value ("LTV")

Term

Profits

First

Description / Type

Range

(Years)

Funding Schedule

Interest

Refusal

Development

Ground-up construction

Between 90% and 97% LTC

4-6

0-30% funded at origination;

Yes

Property

Major redevelopment

balance funded on

Investments

9-24 month draw schedule

Bridge

Refinance existing debt

Typically at 70-100%

5-7

90-95% funded at

Negotiated (1)

Yes

Investments

Owner buyouts

LTV

origination; balance

Operating capital

funded over remaining lease-up period

⁽¹⁾

Existence and/or amount and structure of equity participation depends on LTV and stage of lease-up, among other factors.

Investment Activity

Overview of total investment activity

As of December 31, 2018, our self-storage investment portfolio consists of seven wholly-owned self-storage facilities, 46 on-balance sheet development property investments with a Profits Interest (20 of which are secured by facilities in lease-up and 26 of which are secured by facilities under construction), 11 development property investments with a profits interest in our SL1 Venture (10 of which are secured by facilities in lease-up and one of which is secured by a facility where construction is substantially complete), and 5 bridge investments secured by facilities that are all in lease-up. We also have one construction loan secured by a facility under construction.

On-balance sheet investment activity

Our on-balance sheet self-storage investments at December 31, 2018 consisted of the following:

Development Property Investments - We had 46 investments totaling an aggregate committed principal amount of approximately $533.3 million to finance the ground-up construction of, or conversion of existing buildings into, self-storage facilities.

Table of Contents

participation and is secured by a first priority mortgage on the project. This construction loan had an initial term of 18 months that was extended during the first quarter of 2017 and in 2018. This loan matured and became due and payable on June 30, 2018; however, it has yet to be repaid. Accordingly, this construction loan is in default and was placed on non-accrual status during the three months ended December 31, 2018. Since that time, no interest income has been recognized and will only be recognized if interest is collected in cash. The total unpaid balance of the loan is $17.7 million. As the investment is a collateral dependent loan, we considered the fair value of the collateral when determining the fair value of the investment as of December 31, 2018. The fair value of the investment as of December 31, 2018 is $17.7 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we commenced proceedings to foreclose on the underlying collateral.

As of December 31, 2018, the aggregate committed principal amount of our development property investments was approximately $551.0 million and outstanding principal was $332.0 million, as described in more detail in the table below (dollars in thousands):



	Metropolitan					Remaining
	Statistical Area	Total Investment		Funded		Unfunded
Closing Date	("MSA")	Commitment		Investment (1)		Commitment		Fair Value
Development property investments (includes a profits interest):
7/2/2015	Milwaukee (2)(8)	$	7,650	$	7,648	$	2	$	9,057
7/31/2015	New Haven (2)(8)		6,930		6,827		103		8,350
8/14/2015	Raleigh (2)(8)		8,792		8,498		294		8,002
10/27/2015	Austin (2)(8)		8,658		7,817		841		7,763
9/20/2016	Charlotte 2 (2)(8)		12,888		11,445		1,443		12,793
11/17/2016	Jacksonville 2 (2)(8)		7,530		7,157		373		9,122
1/18/2017	Atlanta 3 (3)		14,115		8,711		5,404		9,337
1/31/2017	Atlanta 4 (2)		13,678		12,957		721		16,031
2/24/2017	Orlando 3 (2)		8,056		7,229		827		8,592
2/24/2017	New Orleans (2)		12,549		10,587		1,962		12,221
2/27/2017	Atlanta 5 (3)		17,492		14,095		3,397		15,371
3/1/2017	Fort Lauderdale (2)		9,952		7,604		2,348		10,475
3/1/2017	Houston (3)(7)		14,825		10,936		3,889		13,285
4/14/2017	Louisville 1 (2)(8)		8,523		6,979		1,544		8,540
4/20/2017	Denver 1 (3)		9,806		6,884		2,922		7,706
4/20/2017	Denver 2 (2)		11,164		10,235		929		12,403
5/2/2017	Atlanta 6 (2)		12,543		10,589		1,954		12,774
5/2/2017	Tampa 2 (3)		8,091		5,493		2,598		6,020
5/19/2017	Tampa 3 (2)		9,224		7,154		2,070		8,391
6/12/2017	Tampa 4 (2)		10,266		8,846		1,420		11,419
6/19/2017	Baltimore 1 (2)(4)		10,775		9,177		1,598		10,805
6/28/2017	Knoxville (2)(8)		9,115		7,717		1,398		8,652
6/29/2017	Boston 1 (2)(6)		-		-		-		2,614
6/30/2017	New York City 2 (2)(4)		26,482		24,760		1,722		28,102
7/27/2017	Jacksonville 3 (2)		8,096		6,836		1,260		8,251
8/30/2017	Orlando 4 (2)		9,037		6,769		2,268		8,264
9/14/2017	Los Angeles 1		28,750		8,692		20,058		8,418
9/14/2017	Miami 1		14,657		6,882		7,775		6,562
9/28/2017	Louisville 2 (2)(8)		9,940		8,691		1,249		10,652
10/12/2017	Miami 2 (4)		9,459		1,335		8,124		1,082
10/30/2017	New York City 3 (4)		14,701		4,835		9,866		4,383
11/16/2017	Miami 3 (4)		20,168		4,096		16,072		3,542
11/21/2017	Minneapolis 1		12,674		3,214		9,460		3,070
12/1/2017	Boston 2 (3)		8,771		3,978		4,793		4,246
12/15/2017	New York City 4		10,591		1,777		8,814		1,631
12/27/2017	Boston 3		10,174		2,563		7,611		2,402
12/28/2017	New York City 5		16,073		6,523		9,550		6,400
2/8/2018	Minneapolis 2 (3)		10,543		7,802		2,741		8,773

Table of Contents

3/30/2018	Philadelphia (3)(4)		14,338		7,870		6,468		8,093
4/6/2018	Minneapolis 3		12,883		2,333		10,550		2,206
5/1/2018	Miami 9 (4)		12,421		2,803		9,618		2,564
5/15/2018	Atlanta 7		9,418		861		8,557		775
5/23/2018	Kansas City		9,968		1,228		8,740		1,137
6/7/2018	Orlando 5		12,969		800		12,169		673
6/12/2018	Los Angeles 2 (5)		9,298		4,597		4,701		4,581
11/16/2018	Baltimore 2		9,247		390		8,857		301
		$	533,280	$	314,220	$	219,060	$	355,831

Construction loans:
12/23/2015	Miami		17,733		17,733		-		17,733
		$	17,733	$	17,733	$	-	$	17,733
Total development property investments		$	551,013	$	331,953	$	219,060	$	373,564


(1)	Represents principal balance of loan gross of origination fees. The principal balance includes interest and fees accrued on the investment.
(2)	Construction at the facility was substantially complete and/or certificate of occupancy had been received as of December 31, 2018. See Note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for information regarding recognition of entrepreneurial profit.
(3)	Facility had achieved at least 40% construction completion but construction was not considered substantially complete as of December 31, 2018. See Note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for information regarding recognition of entrepreneurial profit.
(4)	These investments contain a higher LTC ratio and a higher interest rate, some of which interest is payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each debt agreement, is periodically added to the principal balance of the debt and is recorded as interest income. Thus, the actual collection of this interest may be deferred until the time of debt principal repayment.
(5)	This investment has a total project cost of $29.5 million of which a traditional bank is expected to provide 60-70% of the total cost through a first mortgage construction loan. Of the remaining 30-40% of costs required to complete the project, we will provide 90% through a preferred equity investment, pursuant to which we will receive a preferred return on its investment of 6.9% per annum that will be paid out of future cash flows of the underlying facility, a 1% transaction fee and a 49.9% Profits Interest.
(6)	The Company’s loan was repaid in full through a refinancing initiated by our partner. The investment represents our 49.9% Profits Interest which was retained during the transaction.
(7)	On December 31, 2018, we increased the total commitment amount of this loan in exchange for a fee that was immediately advanced on the loan. The fee will be recognized into income in the future as earned and will be received in cash upon the repayment of the loan.
(8)	As of December 31, 2018, this investment was pledged as collateral to our Credit Facility.

Table of Contents

Wholly-Owned Property Investments – We have acquired 100% of the membership interests in the LLCs comprising our Orlando 1/Orlando 2, Jacksonville 1, Atlanta 1, Atlanta 2, Pittsburgh, Charlotte 1 and New York City 1 development property investments with a profits interest, resulting in the ownership of seven self-storage facilities, as described in more detail in the table below (dollars in thousands):


Location
(MSA)	Date	Date	Gross		Accumulated		Net		Size	Months	% Physical
Address	Opened	Acquired	Basis		Depreciation		Basis		(NRSF) (1)	Open (2)	Occupancy (2)
Orlando 1/2 11920 W Colonial Dr.	5/1/2016	8/9/2017	$	15,828	$	(1,177)	$	14,651	93,965	34	86.1	%
Atlanta 2 340 Franklin Gateway SE	5/24/2016	2/2/2018		11,669		(645)		11,024	66,187	33	79.9	%
Atlanta 1 5110 McGinnis Ferry Rd	5/25/2016	2/2/2018		13,174		(659)		12,515	71,718	33	86.0	%
Jacksonville 1 1939 East West Pkwy	8/12/2016	1/10/2018		11,638		(835)		10,803	59,848	31	88.8	%
Pittsburgh 6400 Hamilton Ave	5/11/2017	2/20/2018		9,596		(274)		9,322	47,794	22	32.8	%
Charlotte 1 9323 Wright Hill Rd	8/18/2016	8/31/2018		12,746		(267)		12,479	85,350	30	57.6	%
New York City 1 1775 5th Ave	9/29/2017	12/21/2018		25,448		(40)		25,408	105,347	17	58.4	%
Total Owned Properties			$	100,099	$	(3,897)	$	96,202

⁽¹⁾

The net rentable square feet (“NRSF”) includes only climate controlled and non-climate controlled storage space. It does not include retail space, office space, non-covered RV space or parking spaces.

⁽²⁾

As of February 24, 2019.

Bridge Investments – We have five separate bridge investments with an aggregate commitment amount of $83.3 million secured by first mortgages on five properties in the Miami, Florida MSA. Three of these bridge investments amounting to an aggregate principal amount of $47.1 million are secured by first priority mortgages on self-storage properties with an aggregate of over 203,000 net rentable square feet that were completed and began lease-up in 2016, which loans bear interest at an annual rate of 6.9%, payable monthly in cash. We have a 49.9% Profits Interest in these three properties. Two of these bridge investments aggregating a principal amount of $36.2 million are secured by first priority mortgages on two recently-completed self-storage properties with an aggregate of over 163,000 net rentable square feet, which loans bear interest at an annual rate of 9.5%, with 6.5% payable monthly in cash and 3.0% PIK interest, accruing and payable upon maturity of the loan. We also have a 49.9% Profits Interest, after the other members of the borrower receive $1.0 million of preferential payments per loan. All five loans mature five years from the date of closing, with the borrower having two extension options for one year each.

As of December 31, 2018, the aggregate committed principal amount of our bridge investments was approximately $83.3 million and our outstanding principal was $81.5 million, as described in more detail in the table below (dollars in thousands):



	Metropolitan					Remaining
	Statistical Area	Total Investment		Funded		Unfunded
Closing Date	("MSA")	Commitment		Investment (1)		Commitment		Fair Value
Bridge investments:
3/2/2018	Miami 4 (2)(4)	$	20,201	$	20,201	$	-	$	22,823
3/2/2018	Miami 5 (2)(3)(4)		17,738		16,883		855		14,432
3/2/2018	Miami 6 (2)(4)		13,370		13,370		-		17,372
3/2/2018	Miami 7 (2)(3)(4)		18,462		17,581		881		15,971
3/2/2018	Miami 8 (2)(4)		13,553		13,472		81		13,785
Total bridge investments		$	83,324	$	81,507	$	1,817	$	84,383


(1)	Represents principal balance of loan gross of origination fees. The principal balance includes interest accrued on the investment.
(2)	Certificate of occupancy had been received as of December 31, 2018. See Note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for information regarding recognition of entrepreneurial profit.

Table of Contents

(3)

These investments contain a higher LTC ratio and a higher interest rate, some of which interest is PIK interest. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each debt agreement, is periodically added to the principal balance of the debt and is recorded as interest income. Thus, the actual collection of this interest may be deferred until the time of debt principal repayment.

(4)

As of December 31, 2018, this investment was pledged as collateral to our Credit Facility.

Real estate venture activity

On March 7, 2016, we, through our Operating Company, entered into the JV Agreement of Storage Lenders LLC to form SL1 Venture with HVP III, an investment vehicle managed by Heitman. The SL1 Venture was formed for the purpose of providing capital to developers of self-storage facilities identified and underwritten by us. Upon formation, HVP III committed $110.0 million for a 90% interest in the SL1 Venture, and we committed $12.2 million for a 10% interest. On March 31, 2016, we contributed to the SL1 Venture three self-storage development investments in Miami and Fort Lauderdale, Florida that were not yet under construction. These investments had an aggregate committed principal amount of approximately $41.9 million and aggregate drawn balances of $8.1 million (fair value of $7.7 million). In addition, as of December 31, 2018, the SL1 Venture had closed on eight new development property investments with a Profits Interest with an aggregate commitment amount of approximately $81.4 million, bringing the total aggregate commitment of SL1 Venture’s investments to $123.3 million as of December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2016, HVP III and the Company agreed to true up the balances in the respective members’ capital accounts to be in accordance with the 90% commitment and 10% commitment made by HVP III and the Company, respectively. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2016, HVP III contributed cash of $7.3 million to the SL1 Venture, and the Company received a $7.3 million cash distribution as a return of its capital.

Under the JV Agreement, we received a priority distribution (after debt service and any reserve but before any other distributions) out of operating cash flow and residual distributions based upon 1% of the committed principal amount of loans made by the SL1 Venture, exclusive of the loans contributed to the SL1 Venture by us. Operating cash flow of the SL1 Venture (after debt service, reserves and the foregoing priority distributions) will be distributed in accordance with capital commitments. Residual cash flow from capital and other events (after debt service, reserves and priority distributions) will be distributed (i) pro rata in accordance with capital commitments (its “Percentage Interest”) until each member has received a return of all capital contributed; (ii) pro rata in accordance with each member’s Percentage Interest until Heitman has achieved a 14% internal rate of return; (iii) to Heitman in an amount equal to its Percentage Interest less 10% and to us in an amount equal to our Percentage Interest plus 10% until Heitman has achieved a 17% internal rate of return; (iv) to Heitman in an amount equal to its Percentage Interest less 20% and to us in an amount equal to our Percentage Interest plus 20% until Heitman has achieved a 20% internal rate of return; and (v) any excess to Heitman in an amount equal to its Percentage Interest less 30% and to us in an amount equal to our Percentage Interest plus 30%. However, we will not be entitled to any such promoted interest prior to the earlier to occur of the third anniversary of the JV Agreement and Heitman receiving distributions to the extent necessary to provide Heitman with a 1.48 multiple on its contributed capital.

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2018, SL1 Venture had 11 development property investments with a Profits Interest as described in more detail in the table below (dollars in thousands):



	Metropolitan					Remaining
	Statistical Area	Total Investment		Funded		Unfunded
Closing Date	("MSA")	Commitment		Investment (1)		Commitment		Fair Value
5/14/2015	Miami 1 (2)(3)	$	13,867	$	12,250	$	1,617	$	14,338
5/14/2015	Miami 2 (2)(3)		14,849		13,961		888		14,562
9/25/2015	Fort Lauderdale (2)(3)		13,230		12,352		878		16,409
4/15/2016	Washington DC (3)		17,269		17,005		264		19,200
4/29/2016	Atlanta 1 (3)(4)		10,223		9,915		308		11,352
7/19/2016	Jacksonville (3)(4)		8,127		7,422		705		11,406
7/21/2016	New Jersey (3)		7,828		5,749		2,079		6,717
8/15/2016	Atlanta 2 (3)(4)		8,772		8,293		479		9,004
8/25/2016	Denver (3)(4)		11,032		10,221		811		12,716
9/28/2016	Columbia (3)		9,199		8,868		331		9,972
12/22/2016	Raleigh (3)		8,877		8,432		445		9,450
	Total	$	123,273	$	114,468	$	8,805	$	135,126


(1)	Represents principal balance of loan gross of origination fees. The principal balance includes interest accrued on the investment.
(2)	These development property investments (having approximately $8.1 million of outstanding principal at contribution) were contributed to the SL1 Venture on March 31, 2016 by the Company.
(3)	Construction at the facility was substantially complete and/or certificate of occupancy had been received as of December 31, 2018. See Note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for information regarding recognition of entrepreneurial profit.
(4)	On January 28, 2019, the SL1 Venture purchased its developer partner’s 50.1% equity interest in this investment. As a result, the SL1 Venture now wholly owns the self-storage property.

On January 28, 2019, the SL1 Venture purchased 100% of the Class A membership units of the LLCs that owned the Atlanta 1, Jacksonville, Atlanta 2, and Denver development property investments with a Profits Interest for an aggregate purchase price of $12.1 million. These purchases increased the SL1 Venture’s ownership interest on each development property investment from 49.9% to 100%. The SL1 Venture now wholly owns the self-storage properties through these LLCs. On February 27, 2019, the SL1 Venture closed on a $36.1 million term loan secured by these four properties.

Operations Strategy

We believe our ability to capitalize on the self-storage industry reputation, relationships, market knowledge and expertise of our management team provides us with substantial benefits in sourcing, underwriting and evaluating attractive investments, executing such investments quickly and effectively, and managing our assets. Under our Management Agreement, our Manager is responsible for administering our business activities and day-to-day operations, including sourcing and originating investment opportunities, providing underwriting services, processing approvals for all loans, acquisitions and other investments in our portfolio and negotiating the terms of any purchase of an investment counterparty’s interest in a self-storage facility. The Manager has an Investment Committee, currently consisting of Messrs. Jernigan, Good and Perry, that reviews all loans and other investments to determine whether they meet our investment guidelines and are otherwise appropriate for our portfolio. The following is a description of the key elements of our Manager’s business operations:

Investment Origination

We utilize the self-storage industry knowledge and relationships of our management team to originate a substantial majority of our investments. Seven of the 16 employees of our Manager, including Messrs. Jernigan, Good and Perry, are actively engaged in the origination process. The Manager’s employees leverage contacts with self-storage facility owners, developers, national commercial real estate brokers, commercial mortgage loan brokers, financial institutions and other persons with an active presence in the self-storage industry in the United States seeking investment opportunities. Each employee of the Manager responsible for originating investments has the self-storage industry knowledge, real estate and finance expertise to determine what investment structure best meets the needs of our partner and the optimal structure of a financing

Table of Contents

solution. We believe the self-storage industry experience, knowledge and relationships of our management team uniquely position us to significantly grow our investment portfolio.

Underwriting

Each of our Manager’s employees who originate investment opportunities evaluates such opportunities in accordance with specific underwriting guidelines, policies and procedures in order to determine suitability for both our partner and our portfolio. Our Manager performs underwriting due diligence on all proposed transactions prior to investment approval and commitment.

In general, our underwriting guidelines require evaluation of the following factors, as appropriate:

the character and integrity of the developer/owner of the project;

the proposed ownership structure of the project, the financial strength, real estate and self-storage industry experience of the project principals, background check on principals, third party appraisal, insurance review, and environmental and engineering studies;

appropriate sub-market demographics, including population density, average household incomes, percentage of non-subsidized renters, per capita self-storage square footage, competitors and rental rates;

with respect to development projects, the construction budget, required interest reserves, the guaranteed maximum price construction contract, buy-out of subcontractors, zoning and entitlement issues for construction and major redevelopment loans;

with respect to existing projects, the construction quality of the self-storage facility to determine future maintenance and capital expenditure requirements, stage of lease-up, quality of management, rental market conditions and prevailing market cap rates;

historical, current and projected rental rates, occupancy levels, revenues and expenses in the sub-market, and for existing facilities, as to that facility;

the historical, current and projected rental rates, occupancy levels and expense levels at comparable facilities;

the potential for near term revenue growth and opportunity for expense reduction and increased operating efficiencies; the facility’s location, its attributes and competitive position within its market, existing competition as well as future competition;

the review of title status and survey;

the requirements for any reserves, including those for immediate repairs or rehabilitation, replacement reserves, real estate taxes and facility casualty and liability insurance;

the availability of capital for refinancing by the borrower if a loan does not fully amortize; and

the internal rate of return.

Key factors considered in credit decisions include debt service coverage, LTV and LTC ratios, development yield, debt yield, cash equity remaining in the deal or level of cash out to the borrower, competitive set relative performance, and facility historical and projected operating performance. Key factors considered in decisions to acquire 100% of the interests in a self-storage facility include stage of lease-up, historical cash flows and current run rate cash flows relative to run rate interest income on our development property investment, leasing experience of the facility and the projected stabilized cap rate on our total investment cost. Consideration is also given to other factors such as developer concentration, facility concentration (both by type and location), identification of strategy for ultimate disposition by partner and expected changes in market conditions.

Investment Approval Process

Employees of our Manager complete the rigorous underwriting process described above prior to submitting proposals to our Manager’s Investment Committee for final approval. After a proposed investment is underwritten, a detailed written investment memorandum and financial summary is prepared. The memorandum includes a description of the prospective investment counterparty and project, demographic and competitive information about the project, a description of the site and the self-storage facility located or to be located on the site, the proposed use of investment proceeds, and an analysis of favorable investment factors and key risk factors. In addition, the presentation provides net operating income projections, development and investment yields, competitive data and coverage ratios. Where the investment involves an operating property (for example, bridge investments or outright purchases), the memorandum contains information regarding physical condition and operations. Each transaction is presented for approval to our Manager’s Investment Committee, which consists of Messrs. Jernigan, Good and Perry. All transactions require the approval of all members of our Manager’s Investment Committee. In addition, the approval of our Board of Directors is required if more than 20% of our equity, determined as of the date of such investment, will be invested in any single project.

Table of Contents

Following the approval and closing of any transaction, our Manager’s investment management group provide customary monitoring and servicing to assure that contract terms have been satisfied.

Investment Processing and Servicing

We service all of our development property investments, bridge investments and other loans with an internal staff employed by our Manager. Our internal staff is assisted in servicing development property investments, including processing construction draw requests, by a nationally known construction consultant. The responsibilities of our investment management team include:

assisting in investment due diligence, documentation and closing;

analyzing and processing draw requests;

ensuring that development projects remain free from impermissible liens and encumbrances;

collecting and analyzing project and developer financial information;

determining compliance with ongoing covenants;

collecting interest, fees and principal amounts owed on loans; and

assisting our accounting and finance team in determining the fair value of our investments and ensuring proper accounting.

Our investment management team utilizes the services of nationally-known independent consultants to inspect projects that are in the construction process and provide guidance with respect to the processing of construction draws.

Property Management and Operations

Our developer partners manage the ownership entity for each project they develop; however, we require each self-storage facility that is the subject of a development property investment or bridge investment to be operationally managed by a professional self-storage manager, which we define as a manager who (i) has a presence on the first page of Google in the facility’s market, (ii) runs a professional and adequately staffed call center, and (iii) maintains a state-of-the-art revenue management function staffed by experienced professionals utilizing the most current technology. We also utilize professional self-storage managers for all wholly-owned self-storage facilities. We believe the benefits of professional third-party management include:

national branding of the facilities providing enhanced marketing and top tier internet presence;

significant economies of scale that reduce operating and G&A expense;

sophisticated revenue management that optimizes profitability;

access to state-of-the-art accounting and information systems that enhance reporting; and

continuous exposure to latest management trends and thought leadership in the self-storage sector that benefits the relationships with customers.

As of December 31, 2018, our developer partners in 54 out of our 57 development property investments (including those made by our SL1 Venture) and bridge investments have selected CubeSmart as the third-party manager, one has selected Life Storage and two have selected ExtraSpace Storage. All seven of our wholly-owned facilities are managed by CubeSmart.

Once a self-storage facility opens for business, we monitor operational data. We are granted full access to the third-party manager’s property accounting system with respect to the self-storage facilities such manager manages for us. Our internal investment management team, consisting of our President and CIO, Senior Vice President of Investment Management, one of our Directors of Operations and our Manager of Portfolio Investments, regularly reviews operating and financial information for our facilities, including property operating budgets, summary rental experience reports, facility leasing dashboards, monthly profit and loss reports and other relevant information. In addition, we have a consulting relationship with the former chief operating officer of a large self-storage REIT pursuant to which he from time to time assists our team in reviewing property operations and makes suggestions for improvements. We share pertinent information with our developers to assist them with solid management practices. We believe that active oversight of property operations is essential to protecting our invested capital, collaborating with our developer partners to optimize profitability, holding our third-party managers accountable for performance and ensuring timely management decisions that maximize the value of our investments.

Table of Contents

Investment Guidelines

Our Board of Directors has adopted the following general guidelines for our investments and borrowings:

no investment will be made that would cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT;

no investment will be made that would cause us to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act;

no more than 20% of our equity, determined as of the date of such investment, will be invested in any single project and no more than 20% of our equity, determined as of the date of such investment, will be invested in projects controlled by a single borrower or group of affiliated borrowers that would form a consolidated group under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”);

over time our average leverage will be in the range of 25% to 35% of our total assets, but we may borrow up to 100% of the principal value of certain development loans secured by first mortgages;

we will maintain a portfolio of geographically diverse assets; and

our Manager must seek the approval of a majority of our independent directors before engaging in any transaction that falls outside of our investment guidelines.

These investment guidelines may be changed or waived by our Board of Directors (which must include a majority of our independent directors) without the approval of our stockholders.

Management Agreement

As of December 31, 2018, we did not have any employees. We rely on the personnel, properties and resources of our Manager to conduct our operations. We and our Manager are parties to a management agreement (as amended and restated, the “Management Agreement”), which was originally entered into on April 1, 2015 and was amended and restated on May 23, 2016, April 1, 2017 and November 1, 2017. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, our Manager is responsible for (a) our day-to-day operations (including finance, accounting and investor relations), (b) determining investment criteria and strategy in conjunction with our Board of Directors, (c) sourcing, analyzing, originating, underwriting, structuring, and acquiring our portfolio investments, (d) sourcing, analyzing, procuring and managing our capital and (e) performing portfolio management duties. The Manager has an Investment Committee that approves investments in accordance with our investment guidelines, investment strategy, and financing strategy.

The initial term of the Management Agreement will expire on March 31, 2020, with up to a maximum of three one-year extensions that end on March 31, 2023. Our independent directors will review the Manager’s performance annually. At the end of the initial term and any extension term, the Management Agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors if such independent directors determine: (a) the Manager has performed its duties in an unsatisfactory manner that is materially detrimental to the Company; or (b) the compensation payable to the Manager is not fair, subject to the Manager’s right to prevent termination based on unfair compensation by accepting a reduction of compensation agreed to by at least two-thirds of the independent directors. We are required to provide our Manager with a minimum 180 days’ prior notice of such a termination. Upon such a termination, we will pay the Manager a Termination Fee except as provided below in the subsection entitled “Termination of Management Agreement”.

The Manager may terminate the Management Agreement if the Company becomes required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act, with such termination deemed to occur immediately before such event, in which case we would not be required to pay the Manager a Termination Fee. The Manager may also decline to renew the Management Agreement by providing the Company with 180 days’ written notice, in which case we would not be required to pay a Termination Fee.

Management Fees

Pursuant to the Management Agreement, we pay the Manager a base management fee in an amount equal to 0.375% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity (a 1.5% annual rate) calculated and payable quarterly in arrears in cash. For purposes of calculating the base management fee, the Company’s stockholder’s equity means: (a) the sum of (i) the net proceeds from all issuances of our equity securities since our IPO (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus (ii) our retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods); less (b) any amount that we pay to repurchase our common stock since our IPO. If our retained earnings are in a net deficit position (following any required adjustments set forth below), then retained earnings shall not be included in stockholders’ equity. Retained earnings also excludes (x) any unrealized gains and losses and other non-cash items that have impacted stockholders’ equity as reported in our financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and (y) one-time events

Table of Contents

pursuant to changes in GAAP (such as a cumulative change to our operating results as a result of a codification change pursuant to GAAP), and certain non-cash items not otherwise described above (such as depreciation and amortization), in each case after discussions between our Manager and our independent directors and approval by a majority of our independent directors. As a result, our stockholders’ equity for purposes of calculating the base management fee could be greater or less than the amount of stockholders’ equity shown on our financial statements. The base management fee is payable independent of the performance of our portfolio. The Manager computes the base management fee within 30 days after the end of the fiscal quarter with respect to which such installment is payable and promptly delivers such calculation to our Board of Directors. The amount of the installment shown in the calculation is due and payable no later than the date which is five business days after the date of delivery of such computation to the Board of Directors. The base management fee was $6.7 million, $3.5 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Incentive Fee

The Manager may also earn an incentive fee each fiscal quarter (or part thereof that the Management Agreement is in effect) payable in arrears in cash. The incentive fee will be an amount, not less than zero, determined pursuant to the following formula:

Incentive Fee = .20 times (A minus (B times .08)) minus C

In the foregoing formula:

A equals our Core Earnings (as defined below) for the previous 12‑month period;

B equals (i) the weighted average of the issue price per share of our common stock of all of its public offerings of common stock, multiplied by (ii) the weighted average number of all shares of common stock outstanding (including (i) any restricted stock units and any restricted shares of common stock in the previous 12‑month period and (ii) shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding OC Units); and

C equals the sum of any incentive fees earned by the Manager with respect to the first three fiscal quarters of such previous 12‑month period.

Notwithstanding application of the incentive fee formula, any incentive fee earned shall not be paid with respect to any fiscal quarter unless cumulative annual stockholder total return for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters is greater than 8%. Any computed incentive fee earned but not paid because of the foregoing hurdle will accrue until such 8% cumulative annual stockholder total return is achieved. The total return is calculated by adding stock price appreciation (based on the volume-weighted average of the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE (or other applicable trading market) for the last ten consecutive trading days of the applicable computation period minus the volume-weighted average of the closing market price of our common stock for the last ten consecutive trading days of the period immediately preceding the applicable computation period) plus dividends per share paid during such computation period, divided by the volume-weighted average of the closing market price of our common stock for the last ten consecutive trading days of the period immediately preceding the applicable computation period. For purposes of computing the Incentive Fee, “Core Earnings” is defined as (1) net income (loss) determined under GAAP, plus (2) non-cash equity compensation expense, the incentive fee, depreciation and amortization, plus (3) any unrealized losses or other non-cash expense items reflected in GAAP net income (loss), less (4) any unrealized gains reflected in GAAP net income (including any unrealized appreciation with respect to self-storage facilities that we have not yet acquired). The amount will be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges after discussions between our Manager and our independent directors and after approval by a majority of the independent directors. In addition, with respect to any self-storage facility acquired by us with respect to which we had an outstanding loan as of the time of such acquisition, the amount of Core Earnings determined pursuant to the formula above in the period of such acquisition shall also be increased by the difference between (A) the appraised value, as determined by a nationally recognized, independent third-party appraiser mutually agreed to by us and the Manager who has significant expertise in valuing self-storage properties, and (B) (i) the outstanding principal amount of any one of our loans secured by such acquired self-storage facility at the time of such acquisition plus (ii) any other consideration given to the former owner upon such acquisition. This addition is intended to include in Core Earnings the amount of our unrealized gain on account of our acquisition of a self-storage facility without such facility being sold to a third party buyer in the open market.

Table of Contents

incentive fee earned for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $0.7 million, is primarily due to the purchases of developer interests in six self-storage projects during the year, and is presented in the Fees to Manager line item in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. No incentive fee was earned for any quarter in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had outstanding fees due to Manager of $3.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, consisting of the management fees payable, incentive fees payable, and certain reimbursable expenses.

Expense Reimbursement

In addition to Management Fees and Incentive Fees as described above, the Management Agreement provides that the Company will reimburse payroll, occupancy, business development, marketing and other expenses of the Manager for conducting the business of the Company, excluding the salaries and cash bonuses of the Manager’s CEO and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and certain other costs as determined by the Manager in accordance with the Management Agreement. Certain prepaid expenses and fixed assets are also purchased through the Manager and reimbursed by the Company. Under the Management Agreement, the Manager may engage independent contractors that provide investment banking, securities brokerage, mortgage brokerage and other financial, legal and account services as may be required for our investments, and we agree to reimburse the Manager for costs and expenses incurred in connection with these services; however, expenses incurred by the Manager are reimbursable to the Manager by us only to the extent such expenses are not otherwise directly reimbursed by an unaffiliated third party. The amount of expenses to be reimbursed to the Manager by us are reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of any such payment or reimbursement. Amounts reimbursable to the Manager for expenses are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and totaled $3.8 million, $3.0 million and $3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Termination of Management Agreement

In the event that the Company terminates the Management Agreement per the terms of the agreement, other than for cause or the Company being required to register as an investment company, there will be a Termination Fee due to the Manager. If the Management Agreement terminates other than for Cause, voluntary non-renewal by the Manager or the Company being required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act, then we shall pay to the Manager, on the date on which such termination is effective, a Termination Fee equal to the greater of (i) three times the sum of the average annual Base Management Fee and Incentive Fee earned by the Manager during the 24‑month period prior to such termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination, or (ii) a price, based on the lesser of (a) the Manager’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (adjusted for unusual, extraordinary and non-recurring charges and expenses), or “EBITDA”, annualized based on the most recent quarter ended, multiplied by a specific multiple, or EBITDA Multiple, depending on our achieved total annual return, and (b) our equity market capitalization multiplied by a specific percentage, or Capitalization Percentage, depending on our achieved total return (the “Internalization Price”).

The EBITDA and Capitalization Percentage are as follows based on our total annual return:


Total Annual Return	EBITDA Multiple	Capitalization %
<8%	5x	5%
8% to 12%	5.5x	5.5%
>12%	6x	6%

Any Termination Fee will be payable by the Operating Company in cash.

We also may terminate the Management Agreement at any time, including during the initial term, without the payment of any Termination Fee, with 30 days’ prior written notice from the Board of Directors, for cause. “Cause” is defined as: (i) the Manager’s continued breach of any material provision of the Management Agreement following a prescribed period; (ii) the occurrence of certain events with respect to the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Manager; (iii) a change of control of the Manager that a majority of our independent directors determines is materially detrimental to us; (iv) the Manager committing fraud against us, misappropriating or embezzling our funds, or acting grossly negligent in the performance of its duties under the Management Agreement; (v) the dissolution of the Manager; (vi) the Manager fails to provide adequate or appropriate personnel that are reasonably necessary for the Manager to identify investment opportunities for us and to manage and develop our investment portfolio if such default continues uncured for a period of 60 days after written notice thereof, which notice must contain a request that the same be remedied; (vii) the Manager is convicted (including a plea of nolo contendere) of a felony; or

Table of Contents

(viii) both the current Executive Chairman and the current CEO are no longer senior executive officers of the Manager or us during the term of the Management Agreement other than by reason of death or disability.

Internalization of Manager

No later than 180 days prior to the end of the initial term of the Management Agreement, the Manager will offer to contribute to our Operating Company at the end of the initial term all of the assets or equity interests in the Manager (an “Internalization Transaction”). Such offer shall specify an internalization price and such terms and conditions as the Manager shall determine.

Upon receipt of the Manager’s initial internalization offer, a special committee consisting solely of our independent directors may accept the Manager’s proposal or submit a counter offer to the Manager. If the Manager and the special committee are unable to agree, the Manager and the special committee will repeat this process annually during the term of any extension of the Management Agreement. Acquisition of the Manager pursuant to this process requires a fairness opinion from a nationally recognized investment banking firm and stockholder approval, in addition to approval by the special committee. As described above, if an Internalization Transaction has not occurred prior to March 31, 2023, the last day of the last renewal term, then the Manager and the Company shall consummate an Internalization Transaction to be effective as of that date, and such Internalization Transaction shall not require a fairness opinion, the approval of a special committee of our Board of Directors or the approval of our stockholders.

Under the Management Agreement, if an Internalization Transaction has not occurred prior to March 31, 2023, the last day of the last renewal term, then the Manager and the Company shall consummate an Internalization Transaction to be effective as of that date and all assets of the Manager (or, alternatively, all of the equity interests in the Manager) shall be conveyed to and acquired by the Operating Company in exchange for the Internalization Price (as described herein). At such time, all employees of the Manager shall become employees of the Operating Company and the Manager shall discontinue all business activities. Unlike an Internalization Transaction that occurs prior to the end of the final renewal term of the Management Agreement, an Internalization Transaction that occurs at the end of the final renewal term shall not require a fairness opinion, the approval of a special committee of our Board of Directors or the approval of our stockholders.

The “Internalization Price” payable in the event of an Internalization Transaction at the end of the last renewal term shall be equal to the Termination Fee and our Board of Directors has no discretion to change such Internalization Price or the conditions applicable to its payment.

The Internalization Price paid to the Manager in any Internalization Transaction will be payable by the Operating Company in the number of units of limited liability company interests (“OC Units”) of the Operating Company equal to the Internalization Price, divided by the volume-weighted average of the Company’s closing market price of the common stock for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date with respect to which value must be determined. However, if our common stock is not traded on a national securities exchange at the time of closing of any Internalization Transaction, then the number of OC Units shall be determined by agreement between our Board of Directors and the Manager or, in the absence of such agreement, the Internalization Price shall be paid in cash.

Competition

Our net income depends, in part, on our ability to make investments and acquire facilities that produce returns at favorable spreads over our cost of capital. In originating or acquiring our target investments, we may compete to a limited degree with other self-storage REITs, primarily including five publicly-traded self-storage REITs (Public Storage, Extra-Space Storage, CubeSmart, Life Storage, Inc. and National Storage Affiliates) as well as several private national self-storage owner-operators, and, with respect to financing transactions, to a greater degree with other commercial mortgage REITs, specialty finance companies, such as business development companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, financial institutions, governmental bodies and other entities. Many of our competitors are significantly larger than we are and have considerably greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us, such as the U.S. Government. Many of our competitors are not subject to the operating constraints associated with REIT tax compliance or maintenance of an exemption from the 1940 Act. Current market conditions may attract more competitors, which may increase the competition for sources of financing. An increase in the competition for sources of funding could adversely affect the availability and cost of financing, and thereby adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In the face of this competition, we have access to our Manager’s professionals and their self-storage industry expertise, which we believe provides us with a competitive advantage and helps us assess investment risks and determine appropriate pricing for certain potential investments. This expertise enables us to compete more effectively for attractive investment opportunities. Moreover, we believe many

Table of Contents

traditional institutional investors do not possess the self-storage industry knowledge or experience to appropriately assess the riskiness of investments in self-storage facilities, and, accordingly, such investors may not compete effectively on pricing and terms for self-storage investments our Manager originates. However, we may not be able to achieve our business goals or expectations due to the competitive risks that we face. For additional information concerning these competitive risks, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors— We operate in a competitive market for investment opportunities and competition may limit our ability to originate or acquire desirable investments in our target investments and could also affect the pricing of these securities”.

Employees

We have no employees and are managed by our Manager pursuant to our Management Agreement. Our Manager currently has 16 employees who provide services to the Company. Our executive officers, comprised of our Executive Chairman, CEO, President and CIO, and Senior Vice President, CFO, Corporate Secretary and Treasurer, are owners and/or employees of our Manager.

Exemption from Regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940

We conduct our operations so that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act. Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. Government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis (the “40% test”). Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are U.S. Government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exemption from the definition of investment company for private funds set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act.

We are organized as a holding company that conducts its businesses primarily through wholly- and/or majority-owned subsidiaries. We conduct our operations so that we and the Operating Company do not hold “investment securities” in excess of the limit imposed by the 40% test. The securities issued by any wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries that we have formed or may form in the future that are excepted from the definition of “investment company” based on Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act, together with any other investment securities we may own, may not have a value in excess of 40% of the value of our total assets (as determined under the 1940 Act) on an unconsolidated basis. We will monitor our holdings to ensure continuing and ongoing compliance with this test. In addition, we believe we will not be considered an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act because we will not engage primarily, propose to engage primarily, or hold ourselves out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Rather, through our wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries, we are and continue to be primarily engaged in the non-investment company businesses of these subsidiaries.

In 2011, the SEC solicited public comment on a wide range of issues relating to Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the 1940 Act, including the nature of the assets that qualify for purposes of the exemption and whether mortgage REITs should be regulated in a manner similar to investment companies. There can be no assurance that the laws and regulations governing the 1940 Act status of REITs, including the SEC or its staff providing more specific or different guidance regarding these exemptions, will not change in a manner that adversely affects our operations.

Although we monitor our portfolio periodically and prior to each investment origination or acquisition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain this exemption from registration for these subsidiaries.

In addition, we, our Operating Company and/or our subsidiaries may rely upon other exclusions, including the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(6) of the Investment Company Act (which excludes, among other things, parent entities whose primary business is conducted

Table of Contents

through majority-owned subsidiaries relying upon the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C), discussed above), from the definition of an investment company and the registration requirements under the Investment Company Act. The SEC staff has issued little interpretive guidance with respect to Section 3(c)(6) and any guidance published by the staff could require us to adjust our strategy accordingly.

We determine whether an entity is one of our majority-owned subsidiaries. The 1940 Act defines a majority-owned subsidiary of a person as a company 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of which are owned by such person, or by another company which is a majority-owned subsidiary of such person. The 1940 Act further defines voting securities as any security presently entitling the owner or holder thereof to vote for the election of directors of a company. We treat companies in which we own at least a majority of the outstanding voting securities as majority-owned subsidiaries for purposes of the tests described above. We have not requested the SEC to approve our treatment of any company as a majority-owned subsidiary and the SEC has not done so. If the SEC were to disagree with our treatment of one or more companies as majority-owned subsidiaries, we would need to adjust our strategy and our assets in order to continue to pass the 40% test. Any such adjustment in our strategy could have a material adverse effect on us.

To the extent that the SEC staff provides more specific guidance regarding any of the matters bearing upon the exemptions we and our subsidiaries rely on from the 1940 Act, we may be required to adjust our strategy accordingly. Any additional guidance from the SEC staff could provide additional flexibility to us, or it could further inhibit our ability to pursue the strategies we have chosen.

Available Information

We maintain a website at www.jernigancapital.com and make available, free of charge, on our website (a) our Annual Report on Form 10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q and Current Reports on Form 8‑K (including any amendments thereto), proxy statements and other information (or, Company Documents) filed with, or furnished to, the SEC, as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are so filed or furnished, (b) Corporate Governance Guidelines, (c) Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and (d) written charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors. Our documents filed with, or furnished to, the SEC are also available for review by the public at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We provide copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, free of charge, to stockholders who request it. Requests should be directed to Investor Relations - Jernigan Capital, Inc., 6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 650, Memphis, TN 38119.

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business and operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, the occurrence of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends to our stockholders and could cause the value of our common stock to decline.

Readers should carefully consider each of the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this annual report on Form 10‑K. Based on the information currently known to us, we believe the following information identifies the most significant risk factors affecting us. However, the risks and uncertainties we face are not limited to those described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, the market price of our capital stock and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND INVESTMENTS

Our growth depends on external sources of capital that are outside of our control and may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could limit our ability to, among other things, meet our capital and operating needs or make the cash distributions to our stockholders necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required under the Code to, among other things, distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. Because of these distribution requirements, we are not able to retain significant earnings to fund future capital needs, including our investments in self-storage facilities, and must rely largely on third-party sources to fund our capital needs. In addition, we have not yet generated sufficient cash flow from operations or investment activities to enable us to cover our distributions to our stockholders and do not expect to do so in the near term. As a result, we are dependent on our Credit Facility, our ability to issue shares of common stock and other access to third-party sources of capital to continue our investing activities and pay distributions to our stockholders. Our access to third-party sources depends, in part, on:

general market conditions;

the market’s perception of our financial strength and growth potential;

our debt levels;

our earnings and expected earnings;

our cash flows and cash distributions;

the market price per share of our common stock;

our ability to make profitable investments;

other expenses that reduce cash flow;

defaults in our asset portfolio or decreases in the value of our portfolio; and

the fact that anticipated operating expense levels may not prove accurate.

Table of Contents

Because we are focused on the self-storage industry, our revenues will be significantly influenced by supply and demand dynamics in the self-storage sector generally, and over-building in particular markets and/or a decrease in demand for self-storage units would likely have a greater adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations than if we owned a more diversified investment portfolio.

While we intend to diversify our portfolio of investments within the self-storage market, we are not required to observe specific diversification criteria. Our investment portfolio consists primarily of investments in self-storage facilities, which subject us to risks inherent in investments within a single industry and property-type. An over-supply of or decrease in the demand for self-storage units would likely have a greater adverse effect on our revenues than if we owned a more diversified investment portfolio. Over-supply can occur when developers over-build the self-storage needs of a particular market or sub-market. Demand for self-storage units has been and could be adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional and local economies and changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing self-storage facilities in an area. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to have a negative impact on the value of our investments, which could cause a decrease in our revenue and/or the fair value of our investments accounted for at fair value. Any such decrease could adversely affect our stock price and/or impair our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We do not expect to invest in other real estate or businesses to hedge against the risk that industry trends might decrease the profitability of our self-storage-related investments.

Substantially all of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value and, as a result, there will be uncertainty as to the value of these investments.

Currently a substantial majority of our portfolio investments are financial instruments and profits interests that are recorded at fair value and are not publicly traded. Personnel employed by our Manager will perform valuations of our investments in consultation with professionals who provide advice as to methodology and data validity. However, no personnel employed by our Manager are valuation experts. The fair value of securities and other investments that are not publicly traded may be difficult to determine and may involve substantial judgment on the part of our Manager. We will value these investments quarterly at fair value, which likely will include use of and reliance on inputs that do not involve market quotations or other objective, transparent or observable characteristics. Because such valuations are subjective, the fair value of certain of our assets may fluctuate over short periods of time, and our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. Factors that might result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement include changes in market yields, discount rates, self-storage project earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”), project stabilization dates, prevailing cap rates for self-storage properties, volatility, market conditions, and other events. Our results of operations and the value of our common stock could be adversely affected if the fair value of our investments significantly decreases from period to period or if our determinations regarding the fair value of these investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon their disposal. The valuation process can be particularly challenging during periods of economic turmoil, such as were experienced during the last financial crisis, making valuations during such times more unpredictable and volatile.

A significant portion of our portfolio is concentrated in the Miami, Atlanta and New York City markets. Adverse economic or regulatory developments in these markets could materially and adversely affect us.

As of December 31, 2018, 21%, 12%, and 9% of the carrying value of our investment portfolio was concentrated in the Miami, Atlanta and New York City MSAs, respectively. In addition, we own two properties in the Atlanta MSA and one in the New York City MSA, and we may acquire additional properties in these markets in the future. As a result of this geographic concentration, our results of operations and the value of our investment portfolio may be disproportionally affected by changes in the condition of the economy in these markets, which exposes us to greater economic risks than if we were invested in a more geographically diverse portfolio. We cannot assure you that these markets will grow or that underlying real estate fundamentals will be favorable to owners and developers of self-storage properties, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows and the fair value of our investments. Our operations may also be adversely affected if competing properties are built in these markets. We are also susceptible to developments or conditions in these states and/or adverse weather conditions and natural disasters (such as hurricanes, windstorms, tornados, floods and earthquakes). Any such developments or conditions in these markets, or any decrease in demand for self-storage properties resulting from the regulatory environment, business climate or energy or fiscal problems, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Table of Contents

Interest rate fluctuations could increase our financing costs and reduce our ability to generate income on our investments, which could lead to a significant decrease in our earnings, cash flows and the market value of our investments.

Our primary interest rate exposures relate to the interest rates and other yield on our loan investments and the financing cost of our debt, as well as our exposure to interest rate swaps that we may utilize for hedging purposes either with respect to our assets or our indebtedness. Our loan investments generally provide for a fixed rate of interest to us, while our credit facility is at a floating interest rate (except to the extent we enter into a hedge). Changes in interest rates could shrink our profit margins on our investments as well as reduce the fair value of our investments. Changes in the level of interest rates also may affect our ability to originate and close debt investments, the value of our investments and our ability to realize gains from the disposition of assets. Changes in interest rates may also affect borrower default rates.

As of December 31, 2018, we had $24.9 million of floating-rate indebtedness, none of which was outstanding under the Credit Facility. Further, all future borrowings under the Credit Facility are subject to floating rates. To the extent that our financing costs are determined by reference to floating rates, such as LIBOR or a Treasury index, plus a margin, the amount of such costs will depend on a variety of factors, including, without limitation, (a) for collateralized debt, the value and liquidity of the collateral, and for non-collateralized debt, our credit, (b) the level and movement of interest rates, and (c) general market conditions and liquidity. In a period of rising interest rates, our interest expense on floating rate debt would increase, while any additional interest income we earn on our floating rate investments may not compensate for such increase in interest expense. At the same time, the interest income we earn on our fixed rate investments would not change and the market value of our fixed rate investments would decrease. Similarly, in a period of declining interest rates, our interest income on floating rate investments would decrease, while any decrease in the interest we are charged on our floating rate debt may not compensate for such decrease in interest income and interest we are charged on our fixed rate debt would not change. Any such scenario could materially and adversely affect us.

Our operating results will depend, in part, on differences between the income earned on our investments and our financing costs. For any period during which our investments are not match-funded, the income earned on such investments may respond more slowly to interest rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short-term interest rates, may immediately and significantly decrease our results of operations and cash flows and the market value of our investments.

Our Credit Facility restricts our ability to engage in certain business activities, including our ability to incur additional indebtedness and make certain investments.

Our Credit Facility contains customary negative covenants and other financial and operating covenants that, among other things:

restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness;

restrict our ability to incur additional liens;

restrict our ability to make certain investments;

restrict our ability to make distributions to our stockholders above our existing dividend per share, subject to other limitations; and

require us to satisfy minimum financial coverage ratios, minimum tangible net worth requirements, maximum leverage ratios and minimum liquidity ratios.

These limitations restrict our ability to engage in certain business activities, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution and our ability to service our debt obligations.

Our Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of our mortgage loans and owned self-storage properties.

Further, our Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of our mortgage loans and owned self-storage properties. In addition, certain of our owned properties are collateral under our term loans. If we are unable to repay or refinance the Credit Facility upon maturity or otherwise have an event of default under the Credit Facility, then the assets securing the Credit Facility could be foreclosed upon, or we might be forced to dispose of some of our assets on disadvantageous terms, with a consequent loss of income and asset value. Furthermore, an event of default under the Credit Facility is considered an event of default under our term loans, which would give the lender the right to foreclose on the

Table of Contents

properties securing them or force us to dispose of those assets on disadvantageous terms. A foreclosure or disadvantageous disposal on one or more of our assets could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay distributions on, and the market price of, our common stock.

We may be unable to make distributions at historical levels, which could result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock.

We intend to continue to pay regular quarterly distributions to our stockholders. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be based upon, among other factors, our historical and projected results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity, maintenance of our REIT qualification and other tax considerations, capital expenditure and other expense obligations, covenants in our Credit Facility, contractual prohibitions or other limitations and applicable law and such other matters as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. In addition, we are required to pay to the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock, a quarterly dividend in cash and in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock or shares of our common stock, at the election of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock. We are also required to pay quarterly cash distributions to the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock. The quarterly dividends payable to the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock and the Series B Preferred Stock rank senior to the rights of our common stock with respect to distributions. To date, we have not generated sufficient cash from operations to cover our distributions to stockholders. As a result, we may have to fund distributions from working capital, borrow on our Credit Facility, incur other debt or issue additional shares of common stock to provide funds for such distributions, or reduce the amount of such distributions. To the extent we borrow to fund distributions, our future interest costs would increase, thereby reducing our earnings and cash available for distribution from what they otherwise would have been. If cash available for distribution generated by our assets is less than our current estimate, or if such cash available for distribution decreases in future periods from expected levels, our inability to make the expected distributions could result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock.

As a result of the foregoing, we may not be able to make distributions in the future, and our inability to make distributions, or to make distributions at expected levels, could result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock.

We operate in a competitive market for investment opportunities and competition may limit our ability to originate or acquire desirable investments in our target investments and could also affect the pricing of these securities.

A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we seek to make. Our profitability depends, in large part, on our ability to originate or acquire our target investments on attractive terms. In originating or acquiring our target investments, we compete with a variety of institutional investors, including other REITs, specialty finance companies, public and private funds, commercial and investment banks, commercial finance and insurance companies and other financial institutions. Several other REITs have raised, or are expected to raise, significant amounts of capital, and may have investment objectives that overlap with ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities. Many of our competitors are significantly larger than we are and have considerably greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us, such as the U.S. Government. Many of our competitors are not subject to the operating constraints associated with REIT tax compliance or maintenance of an exemption from the 1940 Act. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments, deploy more aggressive pricing and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, competition for our target investments may lead to the price of such assets increasing, which may further limit our ability to generate desired returns. We cannot assure that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, desirable investments may be limited in the future and we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, as we can provide no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objectives.

We face significant competition for customers and acquisition and development opportunities.

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases of the occupancy and rental rates of our acquired self-storage properties. We compete with numerous developers, owners, and operators of self-storage properties, including other REITs and national private owners/operators of self-storage properties, as well as on-demand storage providers, some of which own or may in the future own properties similar to ours in the same submarkets in which our properties are located and some of which may have greater capital resources than we have. In addition, due to the relatively low cost of individual self-storage properties compared to other property types, other developers, owners, and operators may have an enhanced capability to build additional properties that may compete with our properties.

Table of Contents

If our competitors build new properties that compete with our properties or offer space at rental rates below the rental rates we currently charge our customers, we may lose potential customers, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain customers when our customers’ leases expire. As a result, our financial condition, cash flow, cash available for distribution, market price of our shares, and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, increased competition for customers may require us to make capital improvements to our properties that we would not have otherwise made. Any unbudgeted capital improvements we undertake may reduce cash available for distributions to our stockholders.

We also face significant competition for acquisitions and development opportunities. Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire properties. These competitors may also be willing to accept more risk than we desire to take, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of investments and the payment of higher acquisition prices. This competition for investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us, may increase acquisition costs and may reduce demand for self-storage space in certain areas where our properties are located and, as a result, adversely affect our operating results.

We face risks associated with property acquisitions.

In connection with our development property investments and bridge investments, we have typically received ROFRs to acquire the self-storage facilities underlying our investments. In addition, from time-to-time, our developer partners offer to sell us their interests in projects we finance, providing us the opportunity to be the sole owner of such projects. Subject to acquisition prices being consistent with our investment objective to create long-term value for our stockholders, we intend to acquire self-storage facilities that we have financed either through the exercise of ROFRs or through privately negotiated transactions with our developer partners.

Moreover, we may not be able to control the timing of acquisition opportunities and have acquired, and in the future will likely acquire, 100% control of properties that are in lease-up and have a substantial number of months until stabilization. In such events, our earnings from such properties could be substantially less than the interest income and fair value increases that we recognized when our investments in such properties were in the form of loans with Profits Interests.

Those acquisitions that we consummate could increase our size and may potentially alter our capital structure. Although we believe that future acquisitions that we complete will enhance our financial performance, the success of acquisitions is subject to the risks that acquired properties may fail to perform as expected or we may not be able to acquire properties we wish to because we are unable to obtain financing on attractive terms, or at all. The failure to make such acquisitions or the failure of acquisitions to perform as expected could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The acquisition of new properties that lack operating history with us will make it more difficult to predict our earnings.

We intend to continue to acquire additional self-storage properties. These acquisitions could fail to perform in accordance with our expectations. If we fail to accurately estimate occupancy levels, rental rates, operating costs, or costs of improvements to bring an acquired property up to the standards established for our intended market position, the performance of the property may be below expectations. Acquired properties may have characteristics or deficiencies affecting their valuation or revenue potential that we have not yet discovered. We cannot assure that the performance of properties acquired by us will increase or be maintained under our management.

We may issue OC Units in our Operating Company as consideration for property acquisitions on terms that could limit our liquidity or our flexibility or require us to maintain certain debt levels that otherwise would not be required to operate our business.

We may acquire certain properties by issuing OC Units in our Operating Company as consideration for one or more property owner’s contribution of property to our Operating Company. If we enter into such transactions, in order to induce the contributors of such properties to accept OC Units, rather than cash, in exchange for their properties, it may be necessary for us to provide them additional incentives. For instance, our Operating Company’s limited liability company agreement (the “Operating Company Agreement”) provides that any holder of OC Units may tender their OC Units for redemption for cash in an amount equal to the value of an equivalent number of shares of our common stock or, at our option, for shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. In addition, we might agree that if distributions received by the contributor on such OC Units through the date of their redemption do not provide the contributor with a defined return, we will pay the contributor an additional amount necessary to achieve that return upon the redemption of such units. Such a provision could adversely affect our liquidity position and financial flexibility. Furthermore, in order to allow a contributor of a property to defer taxable gain on the

Table of Contents

contribution of property to our Operating Company, we might agree not to sell or refinance a contributed property for a defined period of time or until the contributor’s OC Units are redeemed by us for cash or shares of our common stock. Subject to certain exceptions, such an agreement would prevent us from selling or refinancing those properties, even if market conditions made such a sale favorable to us, or, alternatively, would require us to indemnify the contributor for any taxable gain incurred as a result of such a sale. Additionally, in connection with acquiring properties in exchange for OC Units, we may offer the property owners who contribute such property the opportunity to guarantee debt in order to assist those property owners in deferring the recognition of taxable gain as a result of their contributions. These obligations may require us to maintain more or different indebtedness than we would otherwise require to operate our business.

The JV Agreement contains a “put” provision with respect to certain development property investments, the exercise of which could require us to expend significant capital to reacquire development property investments at a time when such capital might not be readily available, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

The JV Agreement contains a provision that permits Heitman to cause us to repurchase from Heitman its share of its interests in the developer entities (the “Developer Equity Interests”). Under the JV Agreement, if a developer causes to be refinanced a self-storage facility with respect to which we have made a development property investment and such refinancing does not coincide with a sale of the underlying self-storage facility, then at any time after the fourth anniversary of the commencement of the SL1 Venture, Heitman may either put to us its share of the Developer Equity Interests in respect of each such development property investment, or sell Heitman’s Developer Equity Interests to a third party. The exercise by Heitman of its put right with respect to any development property investment at a time when we lack capital could result in our being in default under the JV Agreement, in which event we could lose some or all of our economic benefit from the SL1 Venture, including, but not limited to, being removed as the managing member of the SL1 Venture. Moreover, if we are required to use our capital to pay the price of any put by Heitman, we may be unable to fund other commitments or add investments in the future, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Heitman has certain rights of first offer/refusal on follow-on joint ventures and other similar financings during the pendency of the SL1 Venture, which could materially adversely affect our ability to source other equity capital on a competitive basis.

Under the JV Agreement, during the pendency of the SL1 Venture, and as long as the SL1 Venture holds any assets, Heitman has the right of first offer to participate in any joint venture or similar program pursued by us on substantially the same terms as those set forth in the JV Agreement. This right of first offer is extensive, and includes any investment of debt or equity or otherwise, directly or indirectly, in one or more new joint ventures or similar programs for the purposes of funding or providing development loans or financing, directly or indirectly, for the development, construction or conversion of self-storage facilities. Heitman’s possession of such rights could materially adversely affect our ability to obtain joint venture terms from another prospective joint venture partner that could be more favorable to us than the terms of the SL1 Venture and have a corresponding adverse impact on our business.

The SL1 Venture is subject to certain provisions triggered by a change in control of the Company that would permit Heitman to serve as managing member of the SL1 Venture instead of us or, in the alternative, cause a sale of the SL1 Venture’s assets, which could result in the Developer Equity Interests held by the SL1 Venture being liquidated at a time prior to their achieving their full value or Heitman obtaining control of the assets of the SL1 Venture, which could materially adversely affect the relationship between the SL1 Venture and developers/borrowers to the material detriment of maximizing the value of the assets of the SL1 Venture.

The JV Agreement provides that if we experience a change in control, which is defined as (i) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets (excluding the assets of the SL1 Venture), (ii) any merger, reorganization, share exchange, recapitalization, restructuring, or consolidation or similar transaction, which would result in a change in ownership of more than a majority of our outstanding common stock,(iii) the acquisition by any person of an aggregate of a majority of the beneficial ownership of our common stock unless current directors or directors who are selected, nominated or approved by our current directors or future approved directors continue to comprise a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company following such acquisition, (iv) the replacement of a majority of our current directors or directors who are selected, nominated or approved by our current directors or future approved directors, (v) the de-registration of our common stock, or (vi) our bankruptcy or insolvency, then Heitman may either remove and replace us as managing member of the SL1 Venture or cause the SL1 Venture to sell all of its assets. If we are removed as managing member of the SL1 Venture, then the relationship between the SL1 Venture and the developer/borrowers under the development property investments held by the SL1 Venture could be adversely affected, prompting such developer/borrowers to prematurely sell assets at less than optimal value. Further, if we are removed as the managing member upon an event of default (as defined in the JV Agreement) or a change in control, we will lose any reimbursement or fees earned during or attributable to the period prior to our removal and we only will be entitled to promote distributions, if any, based on the fair market value of the assets as of the

Table of Contents

date of our removal. The sale of assets of the SL1 Venture at a time prior to the Developer Equity Interests underlying the development property investments fully maturing could have a material adverse effect on us.

Under the JV Agreement, Heitman has the right to approve all “Major Decisions” of the SL1 Venture, which may materially impact our ability to control our development property investments and operate our business.

Under the JV Agreement, Heitman has the right to approve all “Major Decisions” of the SL1 Venture. These “Major Decisions” include, but are not limited to, the incurrence of any indebtedness by the SL1 Venture, the sale or disposition of assets of the SL1 Venture, the replacement of the managing member, the acceptance of new members into the SL1 Venture and the liquidation of the SL1 Venture. This right to approve all Major Decisions may impact our ability to acquire or dispose of the assets in the SL1 Venture, make other critical investment decisions to maximize the value of the assets in the Heitman Joint Activity, or close on other attractive investment opportunities. To the extent such approvals or consents are required, we may experience difficulty in, or may be prevented from, implementing our plans and strategies with respect to expansion, development, property management, on-going operations, financing, or other aspects of our business.

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

The illiquidity of our portfolio investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need or desire arises. Loans to finance new construction are particularly illiquid due to their potential unsuitability for securitization, the lack of current income from the underlying property and the greater difficulty of recovery in the event of a borrower’s default. In addition, most of our investments will not be registered under the relevant securities laws, resulting in a prohibition against their transfer, sale, pledge or their disposition except in a transaction that is exempt from the registration requirements of, or otherwise in accordance with, those laws. Further, investments in real estate are generally illiquid and cannot be sold quickly. In particular, the tax laws applicable to REITs also generally require that we hold real estate for investment. As a result, we expect most of our investments will be illiquid, and if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Hedging against interest rate exposure may adversely affect our earnings, which could reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, we may pursue various hedging strategies to reduce our exposure to adverse changes in interest rates. Our hedging activity will vary in scope based on the level and volatility of interest rates, the type of assets held and debt incurred and other changing market conditions. Interest rate hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:

interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of rising and volatile interest rates;

available interest rate hedges may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which protection is sought;

due to a credit loss, the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability;

the amount of income that a REIT may earn from hedging transactions (other than hedging transactions that satisfy certain requirements of the Code or that are done through a taxable REIT subsidiary, or “TRS”) to offset interest rate losses is limited by U.S. federal income tax provisions governing REITs;

the credit quality of the hedging counterparty owing money on the hedge may be downgraded to such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction; and

the hedging counterparty owing money in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation to pay. In addition, we may fail to recalculate, readjust and execute hedges in an efficient manner.

Any hedging activity in which we engage may materially and adversely affect our business. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions seeking to reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments

Table of Contents

used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions or liabilities being hedged may vary materially. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio positions or liabilities being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss.

Hedging instruments often are not traded on regulated exchanges or guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, and involve risks and costs that could result in material losses.

The cost of using hedging instruments increases as the period covered by the instrument increases and during periods of rising and volatile interest rates; we may increase our hedging activity and thus increase our hedging costs during periods when interest rates are volatile or rising and hedging costs have increased. In addition, hedging instruments involve risk since they often are not traded on regulated exchanges or guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house. Consequently, there are no requirements with respect to record keeping, financial responsibility or segregation of customer funds and positions. Furthermore, the enforceability of agreements underlying hedging transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory and commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. The business failure of a hedging counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction will most likely result in its default. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of unrealized profits and force us to cover our commitments, if any, at the then current market price. Although generally we will seek to reserve the right to terminate our hedging positions, it may not always be possible to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract in order to cover our risk. We cannot assure you that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in significant losses.

A prolonged economic slowdown, a lengthy or severe recession or further declines in real estate values could impair our growth and harm our operations.

We believe the risks associated with our business will be more severe during periods of economic slowdown or recession if these periods are accompanied by declining real estate values. Declining real estate values would likely reduce the level of new mortgage and other real estate-related loan originations since borrowers often use appreciation in the value of their existing facilities to support the purchase or investment in additional facilities. Borrowers may also be less able to pay principal and interest on our loans if the value of real estate weakens. Further, declining real estate values significantly increase the likelihood that we will incur losses on or material decreases in the fair value of our investments. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could adversely affect our Manager’s ability to invest in or sell loans, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and business and our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.

Our real estate investments are subject to risks particular to real property. These risks may result in a reduction or elimination of, or return from, a loan secured by a particular facility.

We make debt investments in and own and in the future may own more commercial real estate directly as a result of a default of mortgage or other real estate-related loans or the acquisition of real estate assets from our development borrowers or otherwise. Real estate investments are subject to various risks, including:

acts of God, including hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and other natural disasters, which may result in uninsured losses;

acts of war or terrorism, including the consequences of terrorist attacks;

adverse changes in national and local economic and market conditions;

changes in governmental laws and regulations, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance with laws and regulations, fiscal policies and ordinances;

costs of remediation and liabilities associated with unforeseen environmental conditions;

vacancies or changes in market rents for self-storage space;

Table of Contents

inability to collect rent from customers;

increased operating costs, including maintenance, insurance premiums, and real estate taxes; and

the potential for uninsured or under-insured property losses.

If any of these or similar events occurs, it may reduce our return from an affected facility or investment and reduce or eliminate our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.

Delays in the development, lease-up or stabilization of the self-storage properties in which we invest could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the fair value of our assets.

We depend on our developer partners to complete the development, lease-up and stabilization of the self-storage properties in which we invest. The ability of our developer partners to complete the development and lease-up process could be impacted by a number of factors outside of their or our control, including, but not limited to, delays in the applicable zoning and permitting processes, adverse weather conditions, labor shortages, delays in inspections and lower demand for self-storage units in the market in which a property is located. Any delays in the development, lease-up or stabilization of the self-storage properties in which we invest could adversely impact the ability of our developer partners to make interest payments to us as they come due, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the fair value of our assets.

Investments in non-conforming and non-investment grade rated loans or securities involve increased risk of loss.

A substantial majority of our investments do not conform to conventional loan standards applied by traditional lenders. Virtually all of our investments are not rated, and, if they were rated, would be rated as non-investment grade by the rating agencies. The non-investment grade ratings for these assets typically result from the overall leverage of the loans, the lack of a strong operating history for the facilities underlying the loans, the borrowers’ credit history, the underlying facilities’ cash flow or other factors. As a result, these investments should be expected to have a higher risk of default and loss than investment grade rated assets. The failure of our borrowers to make timely payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, and we may be forced to foreclose on self-storage properties securing our loans. For example, subsequent to December 31, 2018, we initiated foreclosure proceedings on the collateral underlying our $17.7 million Miami construction loan and can provide no assurances as to the recovery on the defaulted loan. Any loss we incur may be significant and may reduce distributions to our stockholders and adversely affect the market value of our common stock. There are no limits on the percentage of unrated or non-investment grade rated assets we may hold in our investment portfolio.

Our mezzanine loan assets will involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing facilities.

We may originate or acquire mezzanine loans, which take the form of loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the facility or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the facility. These types of assets involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property, because the loan may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our initial expenditure. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the facility and increasing the risk of loss of principal. Significant losses related to our mezzanine loans would result in operating losses for us and may limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

For assets recorded at cost, we may experience a decline in the fair value of our assets.

A decline in the fair market value of any investment that is recorded and carried at “cost” may require us to recognize an “other-than-temporary” impairment against such assets under GAAP if we were to determine that, with respect to any assets in unrealized loss positions, we do not have the ability and intent to hold such assets to maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery to the original acquisition cost of such assets. If such a determination were to be made, we would recognize unrealized losses through earnings and write down the amortized cost of such assets to a new cost basis, based on the fair value of such assets on the date they are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired. Such impairment charges reflect non-cash losses at the time of recognition; subsequent disposition or sale of such

Table of Contents

assets could further affect our future losses or gains, as they are based on the difference between the sale price received and adjusted amortized cost of such assets at the time of sale. If we experience a decline in the fair value of our assets, our results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be materially and adversely affected.

Insurance on self-storage properties may not cover all losses.

There are certain types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, terrorism or acts of war, which may be uninsurable or not economically insurable. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors, including terrorism or acts of war, also might result in insurance proceeds insufficient to repair or replace a facility if it is damaged or destroyed. Under these circumstances, the insurance proceeds received with respect to a facility relating to one of our investments might not be adequate to restore our economic position with respect to our investment. Any uninsured loss could result in the loss of cash flow from, and the asset value of, the affected facility and the value of our investment related to such facility.

Acquired properties may expose us to unknown liabilities, which could materially and adversely affect us.

We may acquire self-storage facilities subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, against the prior owners or other third parties with respect to unknown liabilities. In addition, purchase and sale agreements may contain only limited warranties, representations and indemnifications that will only survive for a limited period after the closing. Unknown liabilities with respect to acquired properties may include, but are not limited to, liabilities for cleanup of undisclosed environmental contamination, liabilities for failure to comply with fire, health, life‑safety and similar regulations, claims by tenants, vendors or other persons against the former owners of the properties, liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties. If a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle or contest it and may lose some or all of our invested capital in the property, as well as the loss of rental income from that property, which could materially and adversely affect us.

The revenues from our wholly-owned properties and development and bridge investments that are in lease-up are dependent on the ability of our third-party property managers to successfully manage those properties.

Each of our wholly-owned properties and development and bridge investments that are in lease-up is, and we expect for the foreseeable future will be, managed by a third-party property manager. We do not control these third-party property managers, and are accordingly subject to various risks associated with outsourcing the management of day-to-day activities. Our revenues from these properties are dependent on the ability of the third-party property manager to successfully manage the property. Such third-party property managers generally compete with other companies in the management of properties, including competing in, among other things, the quality of service provided, reputation, physical appearance of the property, and price and location. The inability of one of our third-party property managers to successfully compete with other companies in one or more of the foregoing areas could reduce the revenues from our properties, which could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, because we do not control our third-party property managers, the occurrence of adverse events such as issues related to insufficient internal controls, cybersecurity incidents or other adverse events may impact our revenues from our wholly-owned properties. We may be unable to anticipate such adverse events or properly assess their magnitude.

The management of the properties underlying our development and bridge investments and the properties that we wholly own is currently concentrated in one third-party management company.

As of December 31, 2018, our developer partners in 54 out of our 57 development property investments (including those made by our SL1 Venture) and bridge investments are managed by CubeSmart as the third-party manager. In addition, all seven of our wholly-owned facilities are managed by CubeSmart. This significant concentration of operational risk in a third-party management company makes us more vulnerable economically than if our properties were managed by a more diversified group of self-storage management companies. Any adverse developments in CubeSmart’s business and affairs, financial strength or ability to operate our facilities efficiently and effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We cannot provide assurance that CubeSmart will satisfy its obligations to us, the SL1 Venture and our respective developer partners or effectively and efficiently operate the properties underlying our investments or our owned properties.

Table of Contents

Increased operating expenses, particularly real estate taxes, could reduce our cash flow and funds available for future distributions.

Our wholly-owned properties and any other properties we acquire or develop in the future are and will be subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us. In particular, real estate taxes are subject to large increases that cannot be rapidly passed through to customers. If operating expenses increase without a corresponding increase in revenues, our profitability could diminish and limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

We may incur impairment charges.

We evaluate on a quarterly basis our real estate portfolios for indicators of impairment. Impairment charges reflect management’s judgment of the probability and severity of the decline in the value of real estate assets we own. These charges and provisions may be required in the future as a result of factors beyond our control, including, among other things, changes in the economic environment and market conditions affecting the value of real property assets or natural or man-made disasters. If we are required to take impairment charges, our results of operations will be adversely impacted.

Liabilities relating to environmental matters may impact the value of self-storage facilities that we may acquire.

While we preform customary environmental due diligence on all of our investments, and while we seek reasonable assurances from our developers about environmental issues, we may be subject to environmental liabilities arising from self-storage facilities that we own or acquire. Under various U.S. federal, state and local laws, an owner or operator of real property may become liable for the costs of removal of certain hazardous substances released on its property. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such hazardous substances.

The presence of hazardous substances may adversely affect an owner’s ability to sell real estate or borrow using real estate as collateral. To the extent that an owner of a property underlying one of our debt investments becomes liable for removal costs, the ability of the owner to make payments to us may be reduced, which in turn may adversely affect the value of the relevant mortgage asset held by us and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The presence of hazardous substances on a property may adversely affect our ability to sell the property that we own and we may incur substantial remediation costs, thus harming our financial condition. The discovery of material environmental liabilities attached to such properties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

A cybersecurity incident and other technology disruptions could result in a violation of law or negatively impact our reputation and relationships with our developers or property managers, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition.

Information and security risks have generally increased in recent years due to the rise in new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber-attacks. We use computers in substantially all aspects of our business operations, and we also use mobile devices and other online activities to connect with our employees, our developers and our third-party property managers. Such uses give rise to cybersecurity risks, including security breach, espionage, system disruption, theft and inadvertent release of information. Our business involves the storage and transmission of numerous classes of sensitive and/or confidential information and intellectual property, including developers’, third-party property managers’, suppliers’ and employees’ personally identifiable information and financial and strategic information about us.

If we fail to assess and identify cybersecurity risks associated with our operations, we may become increasingly vulnerable to such risks. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we and our suppliers may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us and our suppliers to entirely mitigate this risk. Further, in the future we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance information security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. We can provide no assurances that the measures we have implemented to prevent security breaches and cyber incidents will be effective in the event of a cyber-attack.

Table of Contents

The theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation or release of sensitive and/or confidential information or intellectual property, or interference with our information technology systems or the technology systems of third-parties on which we rely, could result in business disruption, negative publicity, violation of privacy laws, loss of tenants, potential liability and competitive disadvantage, any of which could result in a material adverse effect on financial condition or results of operations.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH OUR MANAGER AND ITS AFFILIATES

Our future success depends on our Manager and its key personnel, and we may not find a suitable replacement for our Manager if our Management Agreement is terminated or if such key personnel or investment professionals leave the employment of our Manager or otherwise become unavailable to us.

We currently rely completely on our Manager to source, originate, underwrite, execute, service and manage all of our investments. Our executive officers also serve as officers of our Manager. Our Manager has significant discretion as to the implementation of our investment and operating policies and strategies. Accordingly, we believe that our success depends to a significant extent upon the efforts, experience, diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the officers and key personnel of our Manager. The officers and key personnel of our Manager evaluate, negotiate, execute and monitor our investments; therefore, our success depends on their continued service. The departure of any of the officers or key personnel of our Manager could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, we can offer no assurance that our Manager will remain our investment manager or that we will continue to have access to our Manager’s officers and key personnel. The initial term of our Management Agreement with our Manager only extends to April 1, 2020, with automatic one-year renewals thereafter. If the Management Agreement is terminated and no suitable replacement is found to manage us, we may not be able to execute our investment strategy or manage our investment portfolio.

Our future success depends, in part, upon our Manager’s ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, investment, financial and operational personnel, and the past performance of our senior management may not be indicative of future results.

The implementation of our business plan may require that our Manager employ additional qualified personnel. Competition for highly skilled managerial, investment, financial and operational personnel is intense. We cannot assure our stockholders that our Manager will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If our Manager is unable to hire and retain qualified personnel as required, our growth and operating results could be adversely affected. Our stockholders should not rely upon the past performance of our senior management, as their past performance in the self-storage business or their other prior professional endeavors may not be indicative of our future results.

There are various conflicts of interest in our relationship with our Manager that could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.

In the course of our investing activities, we pay base management fees to our Manager and reimburse our Manager for all expenses it incurs except the salaries and bonuses of our Manager’s CEO and CFO. The Manager may, at its option, elect not to seek reimbursement for certain expenses during a quarterly period, which determination shall not be deemed to construe a waiver of reimbursement for similar expenses in future periods. As a result, investors in our common stock invest on a “gross” basis and receive distributions on a “net” basis after expenses, resulting in, among other things, a lower rate of return than one might achieve through direct investments. Because we pay a base management fee and reimburse expenses regardless of how our portfolio performs, our Manager’s interests may be less aligned with our stockholders’ interests than if we were internally managed and our management team was compensated largely based on performance.

Our code of business conduct and ethics contains a conflicts of interest policy that prohibits our directors, officers and employees from engaging in any transaction that involves an actual conflict of interest with us without the approval of the audit committee of our Board of Directors. However, we do not have a policy that expressly prohibits our directors, officers, security holders or affiliates from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types conducted by us. In addition, our Management Agreement with our Manager does not prevent our Manager and its affiliates from engaging in additional management or investment opportunities, some of which could compete with us, and our code of business conduct and ethics acknowledges that such activities shall not be deemed a conflict of interest.

Table of Contents

The Management Agreement with our Manager was not negotiated on an arm’s length basis and may not be as favorable to us as if it had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.

We currently do not have any employees and rely completely on our Manager to provide us with investment advisory services. Our executive officers also serve as officers of our Manager. Our Management Agreement was negotiated between related parties and its terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party. We pay our Manager substantial base management fees regardless of the performance of our investment portfolio. Our Manager’s entitlement to a base management fee, which is not based upon performance metrics or goals, might reduce its incentive to devote its time and effort to seeking investments that provide attractive risk-adjusted returns for our portfolio. This in turn could hurt both our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and the market price of our common stock.

Terminating the Management Agreement for unsatisfactory performance of the Manager or electing not to renew the Management Agreement may be difficult and terminating the agreement in certain circumstances requires payment of a substantial termination fee.

The Management Agreement may not be terminated by us during its initial five-year term except for cause. After the initial term, termination of the Management Agreement with our Manager without cause is difficult and costly. Our independent directors will review our Manager’s performance and the management fees annually and, following the initial term, the Management Agreement may be terminated annually upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors based upon: (a) our Manager’s unsatisfactory performance that is materially detrimental to us; or (b) a determination that the management fees payable to our Manager are not fair, subject to our Manager’s right to prevent termination based on unfair fees by accepting a reduction of management fees agreed to by at least two-thirds of our independent directors. We must provide our Manager with 180 days’ prior notice of any such termination. Additionally, upon such a termination, the Management Agreement provides that we will pay our Manager a termination fee equal to the greater of three times the sum of the average annual base management fee and incentive fee received by our Manager during the prior 24‑month period before such termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter, or the internalization price that would be payable pursuant to the formula set forth in our Management Agreement. This provision increases the cost to us of terminating the Management Agreement and adversely affects our ability to terminate our Manager without cause. See “Item 1—Relationship with our Manager”.

The incentive fee payable to our Manager under the Management Agreement may cause our Manager to make riskier investment decisions to increase its incentive compensation and the price it would receive upon internalization of our Manager.

Our Manager is entitled to receive incentive compensation based upon our achievement of targeted levels of Core Earnings. In evaluating investments and other management strategies, the opportunity to earn incentive compensation based on Core Earnings may lead our Manager to place undue emphasis on the maximization of Core Earnings, including through the earlier purchase of interests in self-storage facilities in which we have invested, at the expense of other criteria, such as preservation of capital, in order to achieve higher incentive compensation. Moreover, to the extent such higher incentive compensation increases the EBITDA of our Manager, the internalization price described in our Management Agreement potentially increases by a multiple of such increased EBITDA. Investments with higher yield potential are generally riskier or more speculative, and a focus on these higher yielding investments could result in increased risk of loss of value of our investment portfolio. See “Item 1—Relationship with our Manager—Incentive Fees”.

When we internalize the advisory and management services provided by our Manager, we will become exposed to new costs and risks.

When we internalize the advisory and management services provided by our Manager, we will become exposed to new costs and risks. For example, while we would no longer bear the external costs of the management fee paid to our Manager when we become self-advised, we would be responsible for compensation and benefits of our officers and other employees that were previously paid by our Manager. As a direct employer, we would also be subject to those potential liabilities that are commonly faced by employers, such as workers disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances. Accordingly, if we internalize the advisory and management services provided by our Manager, our financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

We may choose not to exercise our right under the Management Agreement to internalize our Manager. If we choose not to internalize or we are unable to complete an internalization transaction, our business and growth could be negatively affected and we may still be obligated to pay a termination fee upon termination of the Management Agreement.

Pursuant to the Management Agreement, our Manager is obligated to present to us an initial proposal to internalize our Manager no later than 180 days prior to the end of the initial term of the Management Agreement. If an internalization of our Manager has not occurred prior to

Table of Contents

March 31, 2023, the last day of the last renewal term, then the Company is required to internalize the Manager to be effective as of that date and all assets of the Manager (or, alternatively, all of the equity interests in the Manager) shall be conveyed to and acquired by our Operating Company in exchange for the internalization price. Any proposal from our Manager will be the subject of definitive documentation and negotiation between us and our Manager to conclude an internalization transaction, which could adversely affect our business and growth. If we choose not to internalize our Manager and not to renew the Management Agreement or we terminate the Management Agreement at any time after the initial term other than for cause, we will be obligated to pay our Manager a termination fee equal to the greater of (A) three times the sum of the average annual base management fee and incentive fee earned by our Manager during the 24‑month period prior to such termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination, or (B) the Internalization Price. If we internalize our Manager automatically following the expiration of the last renewal term, we will pay an internalization price equal to the termination fee. In addition, if we choose not to internalize and terminate our Management Agreement, we would be required to identify and retain new management, which would be costly, disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Our Manager manages our portfolio in accordance with very broad investment guidelines and our Board of Directors does not approve each investment and financing decision made by our Manager, which may result in riskier investments.

While our Board of Directors periodically reviews our investment portfolio, they generally do not review our proposed investments. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, our Board of Directors may rely primarily on information provided to them by our Manager. Our investment guidelines may be changed from time to time. Furthermore, our Manager may cause us to enter into investments utilizing complex strategies and transactions that may be difficult or impossible to unwind by the time they are reviewed by our directors. Our Manager has great latitude in determining the types of assets that are proper investments for us, which could result in investment returns that are substantially below expectations or that result in losses, which would materially and adversely affect our business operations and results. In addition, our Manager is not subject to any limits or proportions with respect to the mix of target investments that we originate or acquire other than as necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT and our exclusion from registration under the 1940 Act. Decisions made and investments entered into by our Manager may not fully reflect our stockholders’ best interests.

Our Manager may change its investment process without stockholder consent, or elect not to follow it, at any time, which may adversely affect our investments.

Our Manager may change its investment process without stockholder consent at any time. In addition, there can be no assurance that our Manager will follow its investment process in relation to the identification and underwriting of prospective investments. Changes in our Manager’s investment process may result in inferior due diligence and underwriting standards, which may adversely affect the performance of our investment portfolio.

Our Manager’s liability is limited under the Management Agreement, and we will indemnify our Manager against certain liabilities. As a result, we could experience poor performance or losses for which our Manager would not be liable.

Pursuant to the Management Agreement, our Manager does not assume any responsibility other than to render the services called for thereunder and is not responsible for any action of our Board of Directors in following or declining to follow its advice or recommendations. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, our Manager, its officers, members, managers, directors, personnel, any person controlling or controlled by our Manager and any person providing services to our Manager will not be liable to us, any subsidiary of ours, our stockholders or partners or any subsidiary’s stockholders or partners for acts or omissions performed in accordance with and pursuant to the Management Agreement, except by reason of acts constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of their duties under the Management Agreement. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify our Manager, its officers, stockholders, members, managers, directors, personnel, any person controlling or controlled by our Manager and any person providing services to our Manager with respect to all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims arising from acts of our Manager not constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of duties, performed in good faith in accordance with and pursuant to the Management Agreement.

Table of Contents

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

The capital and credit markets have recently experienced a period of extreme volatility and disruption. The market price and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance.

Some of the factors that could negatively affect the market price of our common stock include:

our actual or projected operating results, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity, or changes in business strategy or prospects;

actual or perceived conflicts of interest with our Manager and individuals, including our executives;

equity issuances by us, including issuances of our Series B Preferred Stock, or share resales by our stockholders, or the perception that such issuances or resales may occur;

our payment of the redemption price for the Series A Preferred Stock, upon either a redemption at our option or, until July 27, 2019 in the event of certain change of control events affecting us, at the option of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock;

our payment of the redemption price for the Series B Preferred Stock, upon either a redemption at our option on or after July 26, 2024 or, in the event of certain change of control events affecting us, at the option of the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock;

loss of a major funding source, including the inability to access our Credit Facility, sell senior participations, or A notes, in certain of our investments, or otherwise;

actual or anticipated accounting problems;

publication of negative research reports about us, the self-storage sector or the real estate industry;

changes in market valuations of similar companies;

adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we incur in the future;

additions to or departures of our Manager’s key personnel;

speculation in the press or investment community;

increases in market interest rates, which may lead investors to demand a higher distribution yield for our common stock and would result in increased interest expenses on our debt;

limitations on our ability to pay dividends at historical rates, or at all;

failure to maintain our REIT qualification or exemption from the 1940 Act;

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

general market and economic conditions, and trends including inflationary concerns, the current state of the credit and capital markets;

significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of publicly traded REITs or other companies in our sector, which are not necessarily related to the operating performance of these companies;

Table of Contents

changes in law, regulatory policies or tax guidelines, or interpretations thereof, particularly with respect to REITs;

changes in the value of our portfolio due to increases in capitalization rates, deceleration of rental rates or other factors affecting real estate values, in general, and self-storage properties, in particular;

any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;

operating performance of companies comparable to us;

short-selling pressure with respect to shares of our common stock or REITs generally;

uncertainty surrounding the ongoing U.S. economic recovery and increases in interest rates; and

concerns regarding global economic conditions.

As noted above, market factors unrelated to our performance could also negatively impact the market price of our common stock. One of the factors that investors may consider in deciding whether to buy or sell our common stock is our distribution rate as a percentage of our stock price relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates increase, prospective investors may demand a higher distribution rate or seek alternative investments paying higher dividends or interest. As a result, interest rate fluctuations and conditions in the capital markets can affect the market value of our common stock. For instance, if interest rates rise, it is likely that the market price of our common stock will decrease as market rates on interest-bearing securities increase. Additionally, in the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the price of their common stock. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and per-share trading price of our common stock.

Common stock eligible for future sale may have adverse effects on our share price.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of our common stock, or the availability of shares for future sales, on the market price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock or the perception that such sales could occur may adversely affect the prevailing market price for our common stock. We may issue additional shares in subsequent public offerings or private placements to make new investments or for other purposes. We are not required to offer any such shares to existing stockholders on a preemptive basis. Therefore, it may not be possible for existing stockholders to participate in such future share issuances, which may dilute the existing stockholders’ interests in us.

We have issued and may continue to issue shares of our Series A Preferred Stock that ranks senior to our common stock in priority of dividend payment and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up and has additional corporate governance rights, materially adversely affect our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock and the trading price of our common stock.

As of December 31, 2018, we had 125,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding with an aggregate liquidation preference of $125.0 million. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to a quarterly distribution payable in cash and in either additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock or shares of our common stock, at the holders’ election, as well as a cash premium upon the occurrence of certain triggering events. The Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock with respect to priority of such dividend payments, as well as to rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. As a result, distributions on the Series A Preferred Stock may limit our ability to make distributions to holders of our common stock. Further, upon our liquidation, holders of our Series A Preferred Stock will receive a distribution of our available assets before common stockholders in an amount equal to the greater of $1,000 per share, plus all accumulated but unpaid dividends thereon to, but not including, the date of any liquidation or the amount that would be paid on such date in the event of a redemption following a change of control. Holders of shares of our common stock bear the risk that our future issuances of equity securities, including additional shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and/or shares of our common stock as quarterly dividend payments to the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock, will dilute the ownership interest of existing holders of our common stock, and may negatively affect our results of operations and the trading price of our common stock.

In addition, so long as any shares of our Series A Preferred Stock are outstanding, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, voting as a single class, are entitled to nominate and elect one individual to serve on our Board of Directors. Further, if we are unable to pay the full

Table of Contents

amount of the Series A Preferred Stock quarterly dividends for six or more quarterly dividend periods, whether or not consecutive dividend periods, we are required to increase the size of our Board of Directors by two members, and the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to elect two additional directors to serve on our Board of Directors until we pay the full amount of accumulated and unpaid dividends. Moreover, if at any time that the Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding, Dean Jernigan, our current Executive Chairman of the Board, voluntarily leaves the position of Executive Chairman of the Board, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will have the right to accept or reject the service of any person as CEO (or such person serving as the principal executive officer) of the Company. Such additional governance rights may grant the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock additional control rights, which may impact our ability to run our business, and may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

The rights of our common stockholders are limited by and subordinate to the rights of the holders of Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock and these rights may have a negative effect on the value of shares of our common stock.

The holders of shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock have rights and preferences generally senior to those of the holders of our common stock. The existence of these senior rights and preferences may have a negative effect on the value of shares of our common stock. These rights are more fully set forth in the articles supplementary governing our Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, and include, but are not limited to: (i) the right to receive a liquidation preference, prior to any distribution of our assets to the holders of our common stock; and (ii) the right to convert into shares of our common stock upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in the articles supplementary governing the respective series of preferred stock), which may be adjusted as set forth therein. In addition, the Series A Preferred Stock and the Series B Preferred Stock rank senior to our common stock with respect to priority of such dividend payments, which may limit our ability to make distributions to holders of our common stock.

Mandatory redemption of our Series A Preferred Stock upon the occurrence of certain future events, including a change of control, may require us to make substantial payments to the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock, which may limit our ability to pay distributions to the holders of our common stock and Series B Preferred Stock in the future or to effect a special redemption at our option of the Series B Preferred Stock, even if such events constitute a change of control under the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock.

Until July 27, 2019, upon the occurrence of certain change of control events, the holders of shares of our Series A Preferred Stock have the option to cause us to redeem their shares at a redemption price of $1,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, plus a make-whole premium designed to provide the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock with a return on the redeemed shares equal to a 14.0% internal rate of return through July 27, 2019.

The redemption of our Series A Preferred Stock may require us to make substantial payments to the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock, which would limit our ability to pay distributions to holders of our common stock and Series B Preferred Stock and may materially and adversely affect our ability to fund our investment portfolio. In addition, the redemption of our Series A Preferred Stock may occur as a result of an event that does not constitute a change of control in the articles supplementary for the Series B Preferred Stock, and therefore may not trigger either our right to effect a special redemption at our option of the Series B Preferred Stock or the right of the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock to convert their shares into shares of our common stock. Even if the redemption of our Series A Preferred Stock constitutes a change of control in the articles supplementary for the Series B Preferred Stock, the payment of the redemption price to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock may limit our ability to effect a special redemption at our option of the Series B Preferred Stock or adversely affect the market value of the common stock.

The change of control conversion feature of our Series B Preferred Stock and the change of control redemption feature of our Series A Preferred Stock may make it more difficult for a party to take over our company or discourage a party from taking over our company.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control as defined in the articles supplementary defining the terms of our Series B Preferred Stock, holders of our Series B Preferred Stock will have the right, subject to certain limitations, to convert some or all of their Series B Preferred Stock into our common stock (or equivalent value of alternative consideration). The Change of Control conversion features of our Series B Preferred Stock, as well as the mandatory redemption option conferred to holders of our Series A Preferred Stock upon certain events constituting a change of control under the Series A Preferred Stock, may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for our company or of delaying, deferring or preventing certain change of control transactions of our company under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common stock and Series B Preferred Stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-current market price or that stockholders may otherwise believe is in their best interests.

Table of Contents

Future offerings of debt or equity securities, which would rank senior to our common stock, including our Series B Preferred Stock, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

If we decide to issue debt or equity securities in the future, which would rank senior to our common stock, it is likely that they will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. We have issued $125.0 million of our Series A Preferred Stock, and we may be required to issue additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock or common stock as dividends to the holders of our Series A Preferred stock. In addition, as of the date of December 31, 2018 we had 1,571,734 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding, and we may issue additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock pursuant to our at-the-market offering program for the Series B Preferred Stock. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we may issue up to an additional $43.4 million in additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock. Both our Series A Preferred Stock and our Series B Preferred Stock rank senior to our common stock with respect to priority of such dividend payments, which may limit our ability to make distributions to holders of our common stock.

Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our common stock and may result in dilution to owners of our common stock. For example, at their election, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive a cumulative, quarterly dividend payable in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock or in shares of our common stock.

The issuance of shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, shares of our common stock payable as dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock or shares of our Series B Preferred Stock could affect our ability to pay dividends on shares of our common stock in the future. Future issuances and sales of our Series A Preferred Stock or our Series B Preferred Stock, or the perception that such issuances and sales could occur, may cause prevailing market prices for our common stock to decline and may adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital in the financial markets at times and prices favorable to us. We and, indirectly, our stockholders, will bear the cost of issuing and servicing such securities. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus holders of our common stock will bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting the value of their stock holdings in us.

Our Operating Company may issue OC Units to third parties without the consent of our stockholders, which would reduce our ownership percentage in our Operating Company and could have a dilutive effect on the amount of distributions made to us by our Operating Company and, therefore, the amount of distributions we can make to our stockholders.

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we owned 100% of the outstanding OC Units in our Operating Company. We may issue OC Units of one or more classes in connection with our acquisition of properties, as compensation or otherwise. Such issuances would reduce our ownership percentage in our Operating Company and could affect the amount of distributions made to us by our Operating Company and, therefore, the amount of distributions we can make to our stockholders. Our common stockholders do not have any voting rights with respect to any such issuances or other Operating Company activities.

If we issue OC Units in our Operating Company as consideration for property contributions to our Operating Company, the value placed on such OC Units may not accurately reflect their fair market value, which may dilute your interest in the company.

In the future, we may issue OC Units in our Operating Company as consideration for property contributions to our Operating Company. In the event we issue OC Units, the per unit value attributable to such OC Units will be determined based on negotiations with the property contributor and, therefore, may not accurately reflect the fair market value of such units if a public market for such units existed. If the value of such OC Units is greater than the value of the related property, your interest in our company may be diluted.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE

Our Board of Directors may change our investment strategy or guidelines, financing strategy or leverage policies without stockholder consent.

Our Board of Directors may change our investment strategy or guidelines, financing strategy or leverage policies with respect to investments, originations, acquisitions, growth, operations, indebtedness, capitalization and distributions at any time without the consent of our stockholders, which could result in an investment portfolio with a different risk profile than that of our existing investment portfolio or of a portfolio comprised of our target investments. A change in our investment strategy may increase our exposure to interest rate risk, default risk and real

Table of Contents

estate market fluctuations. Furthermore, a change in our asset allocation could result in our making investments in asset categories different from those asset categories presently owned. These changes could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, the market price of our common stock and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations, changes in the interpretation thereof or newly enacted laws or regulations (including, without limitation, laws and regulations having the effect of exempting mortgage REITs from the 1940 Act) and any failure by us to comply with these laws or regulations, could require changes to certain of our business practices, negatively impact our operations, cash flow or financial condition, impose additional costs on us or otherwise adversely affect our business.

We are subject to laws and regulations at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may change from time to time, and new laws and regulations may be enacted. Accordingly, any change in these laws or regulations, changes in their interpretation, or newly enacted laws or regulations and any failure by us to comply with these laws or regulations, could require changes to certain of our business practices, negatively impact our operations, cash flow or financial condition, impose additional costs on us or otherwise adversely affect our business. Furthermore, if regulatory capital requirements imposed on our private lenders change, they may be required to limit, or increase the cost of, financing they provide to us. In general, this could potentially increase our financing costs and reduce our liquidity or require us to sell assets at an inopportune time or price.

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have had extended implementation periods and delayed effective dates and have required extensive rulemaking by regulatory authorities. While many of the rules required to be written have been promulgated, some have not yet been implemented. Although the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on us may not be known for an extended period of time, the Dodd-Frank Act, including the rules implementing its provisions and the interpretation of those rules, along with other legislative and regulatory proposals directed at the financial services industry or affecting taxation that are proposed or pending in the U.S. Congress, may negatively impact our operations, cash flows or financial condition, impose additional costs on us, intensify the regulatory supervision of us or otherwise adversely affect our business.

Over the last several years, there also has been an increase in regulatory attention to the extension of credit outside of the traditional banking sector, raising the possibility that some portion of the non-bank financial sector will be subject to new regulation. While it cannot be known at this time whether any regulation will be implemented or what form it will take, increased regulation of non-bank credit extension could negatively impact our operations, cash flows or financial condition, impose additional costs on us, intensify the regulatory supervision of us or otherwise adversely affect our business.

The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired.

Under the MGCL, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an “interested stockholder” or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as: (a) any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the then-outstanding voting stock of the corporation; or (b) an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then-outstanding stock of the corporation.

A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the Board of Directors approved in advance the transaction by which the person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the Board of Directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the Board of Directors.

After the expiration of the five-year period described above, any business combination between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder must generally be recommended by the Board of Directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:

80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of the then-outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and

Table of Contents

two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation, other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected, or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder.

These supermajority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under the MGCL, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. The MGCL also permits various exemptions from these provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the Board of Directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Pursuant to the statute, our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution exempting any business combination with our Manager or any of its affiliates. Consequently, the five-year prohibition and the supermajority vote requirements will not apply to business combinations between us and our Manager or any of its affiliates. As a result, our Manager or any of its affiliates may be able to enter into business combinations with us that may not be in the best interest of our stockholders, without compliance with the supermajority vote requirements and the other provisions of the statute. The business combination statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.

Stockholders have limited control over changes in our policies and operations.

Our Board of Directors determines our major policies, including with regard to financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our Board of Directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the stockholders. Under our charter and the MGCL, our stockholders generally have a right to vote only on the following matters:

the election or removal of directors;

the amendment of our charter, except that our Board of Directors may amend our charter without stockholder approval to:

change our name;

change the name or other designation or the par value of any class or series of stock and the aggregate par value of our stock;

increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock that we have the authority to issue;

increase or decrease the number of our shares of any class or series of stock that we have the authority to issue; and

effect certain reverse stock splits.

our liquidation and dissolution; and

our being a party to a merger, consolidation, sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets or statutory share exchange.

All other matters are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors.

Our authorized but unissued shares of common and preferred stock may prevent a change in our control.

Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 500 million shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval. In addition, our Board of Directors may, without stockholder approval, amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of our stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue and classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock and set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares. As a result, our Board of Directors may establish a class or series of shares of common or preferred stock that could delay or prevent a merger, third-party tender offer or similar transaction or a change in incumbent management that might involve a premium price for shares of our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Table of Contents

Maintenance of our exemption from registration under the 1940 Act imposes significant limits on our operations. Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act.

We intend to conduct our operations so that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act. We believe we will not be considered an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act because we will not engage, or propose to engage, primarily, or hold ourselves out as being engaged primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Further, we intend to conduct our business in a manner so that neither we, nor our Operating Company, own investment securities in excess of the 40% test set forth in Section 3(a)(1)(C) discussed herein. Because we are a holding company that will conduct its businesses primarily through wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries, this means the securities issued by these subsidiaries that are excepted from the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act, together with any other investment securities we may own, may not have a combined value in excess of 40% of the value of our (or our Operating Company’s) total assets (exclusive of U.S. Government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. This requirement limits the types of businesses in which we may engage through our subsidiaries. In addition, the assets we and our subsidiaries may originate or acquire are limited by the provisions of the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations promulgated under the 1940 Act, which may adversely affect our business.

If the value of securities issued by our subsidiaries that are excepted from the definition of “investment company” by Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act, together with any other investment securities we own, exceeds 40% of our total assets on an unconsolidated basis, or if one or more of such subsidiaries fail to maintain an exception or exemption from the 1940 Act, we could, among other things, be required either (a) to substantially change the manner in which we conduct our operations to avoid being required to register as an investment company, (b) effect sales of our assets in a manner that, or at a time when, we would not otherwise choose to do so, or (c) to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act, any of which could negatively affect our business, the value of our common stock, the sustainability of our business model, and our ability to make distributions, which also could have an adverse effect on our business and the market price for our shares of common stock. If we or any of our subsidiaries were required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act, the registered entity would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to capital structure (including restrictions on the ability to use leverage), management, operations, prohibitions on transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the 1940 Act), portfolio composition, including restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration, and compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly change our operations. Additionally, our Manager may terminate our Management Agreement if we are required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act.

Failure to meet an exception from the definition of “investment company” from the 1940 Act would require us to significantly restructure our investment strategy. For example, because affiliate transactions are generally prohibited under the 1940 Act, we would not be able to enter into transactions with any of our affiliates if we are required to register as an investment company, and we might be required to terminate our Management Agreement and any other agreements with affiliates, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business and pay distributions. If we were required to register us as an investment company but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

We expect certain subsidiaries that we may form in the future to rely upon the exception from the definition of “investment company” set forth in Section 3(c) (5)(C) of the 1940 Act, which applies to entities “primarily engaged” in the business of “purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” This exception, as interpreted by the staff of the SEC, generally requires that at least 55% of a subsidiary’s assets must be comprised of qualifying assets and the remaining 45% of the subsidiary’s portfolio be comprised of real estate-related assets (as such terms have been interpreted by the staff of the SEC). SEC staff no-action letters have indicated that the foregoing real estate-related assets test will be met if at least 25% of such subsidiary’s assets are invested in real estate-related assets, which threshold is subject to reduction to the extent that the subsidiary invested more than 55% of its total assets in qualifying assets, and no more than 20% of such subsidiary’s total assets are invested in miscellaneous investments. We expect each of our subsidiaries relying on Section 3(c)(5)(C) to rely on guidance published by the SEC staff and on our analyses of such guidance to determine which assets are qualifying real estate assets and real estate-related assets. However, the SEC’s guidance was issued in accordance with factual situations that may be substantially different from the factual situations we may face, and much of the guidance was issued more than 20 years ago. No assurance can be given that the SEC staff will concur with our classification of our assets. In addition, the SEC staff may, in the future, issue further guidance that may require us to re-classify our assets for purposes of qualifying for an exception from the definition of “investment company” under the 1940 Act. If we are required to re-classify our subsidiaries’ assets, they may no longer be in compliance with the exception from the definition of an “investment company” provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the 1940 Act. To the extent that the SEC staff publishes new or different guidance with respect to any assets we have determined to be qualifying or real estate-related assets, we may be required to adjust our strategy accordingly. In addition,

Table of Contents

we may be limited in our ability to make certain investments and these limitations could result in a subsidiary holding assets we might wish to sell or not acquiring or selling assets we might wish to hold.

In addition, our Operating Company and/or our subsidiaries may rely upon other exclusions, including the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(6) of the 1940 Act (which excludes, among other things, parent entities whose primary business is conducted through majority-owned subsidiaries relying upon the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C), discussed above), from the definition of an investment company and the registration requirements under the Investment Company Act. The SEC staff has issued little interpretive guidance with respect to Section 3(c)(6) and any guidance published by the staff could require us to adjust our strategy accordingly.

We determine whether an entity is one of our majority-owned subsidiaries. The 1940 Act defines a majority-owned subsidiary of a person as a company 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of which are owned by such person, or by another company which is a majority-owned subsidiary of such person. The 1940 Act further defines voting securities as any security presently entitling the owner or holder thereof to vote for the election of directors of a company. We treat companies in which we own at least a majority of the outstanding voting securities as majority-owned subsidiaries for purposes of the tests discussed above. We have not requested the SEC to approve our treatment of any company as a majority-owned subsidiary and the SEC has not done so. If the SEC were to disagree with our treatment of one or more companies as majority-owned subsidiaries, we would need to adjust our strategy and our assets in order to continue to pass the 40% test. Any such adjustment in our strategy could have a material adverse effect on us.

In August 2011, the SEC solicited public comment on a wide range of issues relating to Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the 1940 Act, including the nature of the assets that qualify for purposes of the exemption and whether mortgage REITs should be regulated in a manner similar to investment companies. There can be no assurance that the laws and regulations governing the 1940 Act status of REITs, including the SEC or its staff providing more specific or different guidance regarding these exemptions, will not change in a manner that adversely affects our operations.

Rapid and steep declines in the values of our self-storage-related investments may make it more difficult for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT or exemption from the 1940 Act.

If the market value or income potential of our self-storage-related investments declines as a result of increased interest rates or other factors, we may need to increase our real estate investments and income and/or liquidate our non-qualifying assets in order to maintain our REIT qualification or exemption from the 1940 Act. If the decline in real estate asset values and/or income occurs quickly, this may be especially difficult to accomplish. This difficulty may be exacerbated by the illiquid nature of any non-qualifying assets that we may own. We may have to make investment decisions that we otherwise would not make absent the REIT and 1940 Act considerations.

Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover on claims against our directors and officers are limited, which could reduce your and our recovery against them if they negligently cause us to incur losses.

The MGCL provides that a director has no liability in such capacity if he performs his duties in good faith, in a manner he reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. A director who performs his or her duties in accordance with the foregoing standards should not be liable to us or any other person for failure to discharge his or her obligations as a director.

In addition, our charter provides that our directors and officers will not be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages unless the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit or profit in money, property or services, or is adjudged to be liable to us or our stockholders based on a finding that his or her action, or failure to act, was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty and was material to the cause of action adjudicated in the proceeding. Our charter also requires us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification, pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to any individual who is a present or former director or officer and who is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity or any individual who, while a director or officer and at our request, serves or has served as a director, officer, partner, trustee, member or manager of another corporation, REIT, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise and who is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity. With the approval of our Board of Directors, we may provide such indemnification and advance for expenses to any individual who served a predecessor of us in any of the capacities described above and any employee or agent of us or a predecessor of us, including our Manager and its affiliates.

Table of Contents

We also are permitted, and intend, to purchase and maintain insurance or provide similar protection on behalf of any directors, officers, employees and agents, including our Manager and its affiliates, against any liability asserted which was incurred in any such capacity with us or arising out of such status. This may result in us having to expend significant funds, which will reduce the available cash for distribution to our stockholders.

Ownership limitations may restrict change of control or business combination opportunities in which our stockholders might receive a premium for their shares.

In order for us to qualify as a REIT, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals during the last half of any calendar year. “Individuals” for this purpose include natural persons, private foundations, some employee benefit plans and trusts, and some charitable trusts. To preserve our REIT qualification, our charter generally prohibits any person from directly or indirectly owning more than 9.8% in value of the outstanding shares of our capital stock or more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock. This ownership limitation could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of our common stock might receive a premium for their shares over the then prevailing market price or which holders might believe to be otherwise in their best interests.

Conflicts of interest could arise in the future between the interests of our stockholders and the interests of holders of units in our Operating Company, which may impede business decisions that could benefit our stockholders.

Although outside holders of OC Units will not have voting rights or the power to direct our company’s affairs, there could be potential conflicts, conflicts of interest could arise in the future as a result of the relationships between us and our affiliates, on the one hand, and our Operating Company or any partner thereof.

Our directors and officers have duties to our company under Maryland law in connection with their management of our company. At the same time, we, as the managing member of our Operating Company, has fiduciary duties and obligations to our Operating Company and any future members of our Operating Company under Delaware law and the Operating Company Agreement in connection with the management of our Operating Company. Our fiduciary duties and obligations as the managing member of our Operating Company may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to our company. These conflicts of interest could lead to decisions that are not in the best interests of our company and its stockholders.

Unless otherwise provided for in a limited liability company, Delaware law generally requires a managing member of a Delaware limited liability company to adhere to fiduciary duty standards under which it owes its limited partners the highest duties of good faith, fairness and loyalty and which generally prohibit such general partner from taking any action or engaging in any transaction as to which it has a conflict of interest. The Operating Company Agreement provides that, in the event of a conflict between the interests of the members of our Operating Company, on the one hand, and the separate interests of our stockholders, on the other hand, the we, in our capacity as the managing member of our Operating Company, shall act in the interests of our stockholders and is under no obligation to consider the separate interests of the limited partners of our Operating Company in deciding whether to cause our Operating Company to take or not to take any actions. The Operating Company Agreement further provides that any decisions or actions not taken by us, as managing member, in accordance with the Operating Company Agreement will not violate any duties, including the duty of loyalty, which the general partner, in its capacity as the general partner of our Operating Company, owes to our Operating Company and its partners.

Additionally, the Operating Company Agreement provides that we will not be liable to our Operating Company or any partner for monetary damages for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived by our Operating Company or any member unless the we acted in bad faith and the act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the loss, liability or benefit not derived. Our Operating Company must indemnify us, our directors and officers, officers of our Operating Company and others designated by us from and against any and all claims that relate to the operations of our Operating Company, unless (1) an act or omission of the indemnified person was material to the matter giving rise to the action and either was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (2) the indemnified person actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (3) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. Our Operating Company must also pay or reimburse the reasonable expenses of any such person upon its receipt of a written affirmation of the person's good faith belief that the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification has been met and a written undertaking to repay any amounts paid or advanced if it is ultimately determined that the person did not meet the standard of conduct for indemnification. Our Operating Company will not indemnify or advance funds to any person with respect to any action initiated by the person seeking indemnification without our approval (except for any proceeding brought to

Table of Contents

enforce such person's right to indemnification under the partnership agreement) or if the person is found to be liable to our Operating Company on any portion of any claim in the action. No reported decision of a Delaware appellate court has interpreted provisions similar to the provisions of the Operating Company Agreement that modify and reduce our fiduciary duties or obligations as the managing member or reduce or eliminate our liability for money damages to our Operating Company and its partners, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel as to the enforceability of the provisions set forth in the Operating Company Agreement that purport to modify or reduce the fiduciary duties that would be in effect were it not for the Operating Company Agreement.

U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX RISKS

Our failure to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and potentially state and local tax, and would adversely affect our operations and the market price of our common stock.

We elected to be taxed as a REIT commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2015. However, we may terminate our REIT election if our Board of Directors determines that not qualifying as a REIT is in the best interests of our stockholders, or our REIT election may be inadvertently terminated. Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. We continue to be organized and operate in a manner designed to satisfy all the requirements for qualification as a REIT. The REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex and interpretation of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT is limited. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in operating so we can qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. Our ability to satisfy the REIT asset tests depends on our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the REIT income or quarterly asset requirements also depends on our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, if certain of our operations were to be recharacterized by the IRS, such recharacterization could jeopardize our ability to satisfy all the requirements for qualification as a REIT.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, and we do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT qualification. Losing our REIT qualification would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.

REITs, in certain circumstances, may incur tax liabilities that would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may become subject to U.S. federal income taxes and related state and local taxes. For example, net income from the sale of properties (including self-storage facilities or mortgage loans) that are “dealer” properties sold by a REIT (a “prohibited transaction” under the Code) will be subject to a 100% penalty tax (the “prohibited transactions tax”). Also, we may not make sufficient distributions to avoid certain excise taxes applicable to REITs. Similarly, if we were to fail an income test (and did not lose our REIT status because such failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect) we would be subject to tax on the income that does not meet the income test requirements. We also may decide to retain net capital gain we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability unless they file U.S. federal income tax returns and thereon seek a refund of such tax. We also may be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, including franchise, payroll, mortgage recording and transfer taxes, either directly or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets, such as our TRSs, which are subject to full U.S. federal, state, local and foreign corporate-level income taxes. Any taxes we pay directly or indirectly will reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

To qualify as a REIT we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may force us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities or borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions. This could delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce your overall return.

In order to qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we must annually distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum

Table of Contents

of (a) 85% of our ordinary income, (b) 95% of our capital gain net income and (c) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be used to fund loans, and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds, possibly at unfavorable rates, or sell assets to fund these distributions. Although we intend to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements and to avoid U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our earnings while we qualify as a REIT, it is possible that we might not always be able to do so.

Certain of our business activities are potentially subject to the prohibited transaction tax, which could reduce the return on your investment.

For so long as we qualify as a REIT, our ability to dispose of property during the first few years following acquisition may be restricted to a substantial extent as a result of our REIT qualification.

Under applicable provisions of the Code regarding prohibited transactions by REITs, we will be subject to the prohibited transactions tax on any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of any property (other than foreclosure property, but including self-storage facilities and mortgage loans held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business) that we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, but generally excluding our TRSs, that is deemed to be inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Whether property is inventory or otherwise held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each property. While we qualify as a REIT, we may avoid the 100% prohibited transaction tax by (a) conducting activities that may otherwise be considered prohibited transactions through a TRS (but such TRS will incur income taxes), (b) conducting our operations in such a manner so that no sale or other disposition of an asset we own, directly or through any subsidiary, will be treated as a prohibited transaction, or (c) structuring certain dispositions of our assets to comply with a prohibited transaction safe harbor available under the Code for assets held for at least two years. However, no assurance can be given that any particular asset we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, but generally excluding any TRS of ours, will not be treated as inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.

The tax on prohibited transactions will limit our ability to engage in transactions, including certain methods of securitizing mortgage loans that would be treated as sales for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to the prohibited transactions tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property. We might be subject to this tax if we were to sell or securitize loans in a manner that was treated as a sale of the loans for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, in order to avoid the prohibited transactions tax, we may choose not to engage in certain sales of loans, other than through a TRS, and we may be required to limit the structures we use for our loan sales, even though such sales or structures might otherwise be beneficial for us. If we sell a first mortgage loan through a TRS, it is possible that gain from the sale of the loan will be recharacterized as though we sold the loan directly. Even if the sale of a loan by a TRS is not recharacterized, any gain on the sale by the TRS will be subject to regular corporate income tax.

TRSs are subject to corporate-level taxes and our dealings with any TRSs we establish may be subject to 100% excise tax.

A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 25% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% of the gross value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s length basis.

TRSs that we may form will pay U.S. federal, state and local income tax on their taxable income, and their after-tax net income will be available for distribution to us but will not be required to be distributed to us, unless necessary to maintain our REIT qualification. While we will monitor the aggregate value of the securities of any TRSs we form and intend to conduct our affairs so that such securities will represent less than 20% of the value of our total assets, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the TRS limitation in all market conditions.

Table of Contents

Our investments in certain debt instruments may cause us to recognize “phantom income” for U.S. federal income tax purposes even though no cash payments have been received on the debt instruments and certain modifications of such debt by us could cause the modified debt to not qualify as a good REIT asset, thereby jeopardizing our REIT qualification.

Our taxable income may substantially exceed our net income as determined based on GAAP, or differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash may occur. For example, we may acquire assets, including debt securities requiring us to accrue original issue discount, or OID, or recognize market discount income, that generates taxable income in excess of economic income or in advance of the corresponding cash flow from the assets (referred to as “phantom income”). Furthermore, if we own an equity interest in an entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes (or are treated as owning such an interest for federal income tax purposes), we may be required to include taxable income without a corresponding cash distribution from such entity. In addition, if a borrower with respect to a particular debt instrument encounters financial difficulty rendering it unable to pay stated interest as due, we may nonetheless be required to continue to recognize the unpaid interest as taxable income with the effect that we will recognize income but will not have a corresponding amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Also, our investment structures may consist of a mortgage loan or mortgage loans as well as a profits or other equity interest in the borrower. It is possible the IRS could disagree with the amount of our investment that we allocate to the mortgage loan or loans (or between such loans) and the profits or other equity interest. If the IRS successfully allocated less of our investment to the mortgage loan or loans, it is possible such allocation could result in an increased amount of OID with respect to such loans. As described above, the OID could generate phantom income.

As a result of the foregoing, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year and find it difficult or impossible to meet the REIT distribution requirements in certain circumstances. In such circumstances, we may be required to (a) sell assets in adverse market conditions, (b) borrow on unfavorable terms, (c) distribute amounts that would otherwise be used for future acquisitions or used to repay debt, or (d) make a taxable distribution of our shares of common stock as part of a distribution in which stockholders may elect to receive shares of common stock or (subject to a limit measured as a percentage of the total distribution) cash, in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements.

The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

In order for a loan to be treated as a qualifying real estate asset producing qualifying income for purposes of the REIT asset and income tests, generally the loan must be secured by real property. We may originate or acquire mezzanine loans that are not directly secured by real property but instead secured by equity interests in a partnership or limited liability company that directly or indirectly owns real property. In Revenue Procedure 2003‑65, the IRS provided a safe harbor pursuant to which a mezzanine loan that is not secured by real estate would, if it meets each of the requirements contained in the Revenue Procedure, be treated by the IRS as a qualifying real estate asset. Although the Revenue Procedure provides a safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law and in many cases it may not be possible for us to meet all the requirements of the safe harbor. We cannot provide assurance that any mezzanine loan in which we invest would be treated as a qualifying asset producing qualifying income for REIT qualification purposes. If any such loan fails either the REIT income or asset tests, we may be disqualified as a REIT.

We may own equity participations in the form of equity interests in our borrowers, in which case our ability to qualify as a REIT could be affected by our borrowers’ compliance with various operating covenants.

Some of our equity participations are structured as equity interests in our borrowers. For purposes of the REIT asset and income tests, our equity interest in a borrower that is a partnership for federal income tax purposes will represent an interest in the borrower’s income or assets based on our capital interest in the partnership. We intend to obtain covenants from borrowers in which we own an equity interest that require the borrower to hold nearly all qualifying assets for purposes of the REIT 75% asset test and earn nearly all of its income from qualifying income for purposes of the REIT 75% and 95% income tests. If a borrower does not comply with such covenants, our ability to qualify as a REIT could be adversely affected. Alternatively, we may hold equity interests in borrowers through a TRS, in which case income derived from the equity interest may be subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax.

Table of Contents

Our qualification as a REIT and exemption from U.S. federal income tax with respect to certain assets may be dependent on the accuracy of legal opinions or advice rendered or given or statements by the issuers of assets that we acquire, and the inaccuracy of any such opinions, advice or statements may adversely affect our REIT qualification and result in significant corporate-level tax.

When purchasing securities, we may rely on opinions or advice of counsel for the issuer of such securities, or statements made in related offering documents, for purposes of determining whether such securities represent debt or equity securities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and also to what extent those securities constitute real estate assets for purposes of the asset tests and produce qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. The inaccuracy of any such opinions, advice or statements may adversely affect our REIT qualification and result in significant corporate-level tax.

We may choose to make distributions in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay income taxes in excess of the cash dividends you receive.

In connection with our qualification as a REIT, we are required to annually distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. In order to satisfy this requirement, we may make distributions that are payable in cash and/or shares of our common stock (which could account for up to 80% of the aggregate amount of such distributions) at the election of each stockholder. Taxable stockholders receiving such distributions will be required to include the full amount of such distributions as ordinary dividend income to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, U.S. stockholders may be required to pay income taxes with respect to such distributions in excess of the cash portion of the distribution received. Accordingly, stockholders receiving a distribution of our shares may be required to sell shares received in such distribution or may be required to sell other stock or assets owned by them, at a time that may be disadvantageous, in order to satisfy any tax imposed on such distribution. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock that it receives as part of the distribution in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount it must include in income with respect to the distribution, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such distribution, including in respect of all or a portion of such distribution that is payable in stock, by withholding or disposing of part of the shares included in such distribution and using the proceeds of such disposition to satisfy the withholding tax imposed. In addition, if a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our common stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividend income, such sale may put downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.

Various tax aspects of such a taxable cash/stock distribution are uncertain and have not yet been addressed by the IRS. No assurance can be given that the IRS will not impose requirements in the future with respect to taxable cash/stock distributions, including on a retroactive basis, or assert that the requirements for such taxable cash/stock distributions have not been met.

Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.

Qualified dividend income payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is subject to the reduced maximum tax rate applicable to capital gains. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock. Our ordinary dividends generally are taxed at the higher tax rates applicable to ordinary income, the current maximum rate of which is 37%. However, for taxable years prior to 2026, individual stockholders are generally allowed to deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary dividends distributed by us, subject to certain limitations, which would reduce the maximum marginal effective tax rate for individuals on the receipt of such ordinary dividends to 29.6%.

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.

The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets, if properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRSs would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to

Table of Contents

bear. In addition, losses in a TRS generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income of such TRS.

Complying with REIT requirements may force us to forgo and/or liquidate otherwise attractive investment opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually and that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and certain kinds of mortgage-related securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 25% of the value of our total securities can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate assets from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

Changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws, including the enactment of certain tax reform measures, could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

The legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders. The impact of the act on us and our shareholders is uncertain, and may not become evident for some period of time. For example, the act contained provisions that may reduce the relative competitive advantage of operating as a REIT, including the lowering of income tax rates on individuals and corporations, which eases the burden of double taxation on corporate dividends and potentially causes the single level of taxation on REIT distributions to become relatively less attractive. The act also contains provisions allowing the expensing of capital expenditures, which could result in the bunching of taxable income and required distributions for REITs, and provisions extending the depreciable lives of certain real estate assets and further limiting the deductibility of interest expense, which could negatively impact the real estate market. In addition, although the Tax Act was recently passed, there can be no assurance that future changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws or regulatory changes will not be proposed or enacted that could impact our business and financial results. The REIT rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department, which may result in revisions to regulations and interpretations in addition to statutory changes. If enacted, certain of such changes could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent the Tax Act and any new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will impact the real estate investment industry or REITs. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of the Tax Act and potential future changes to the federal tax laws on an investment in our shares.

Potential characterization of distributions or gain on sale may be treated as unrelated business taxable income to tax-exempt investors.

If (a) we are a “pension-held REIT,” (b) a tax-exempt stockholder has incurred debt to purchase or hold our common stock or (c) a holder of common stock is a certain type of tax-exempt stockholder, dividends on, and gains recognized on the sale of, common stock by such tax-exempt stockholder may be subject to U.S. federal income tax as unrelated business taxable income under the Code.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of the date of this Annual Report, we own 100% of the membership interests in the LLCs that own the fee simple interests in the seven self-storage facilities listed in the table below. We acquired from our developer partners in those LLCs all of their membership interests in privately negotiated transactions. In the future, we may acquire 100% ownership of self-storage facilities in that same manner or through the exercise of ROFRs.


				Occupancy
		Number of	Total Rentable	as of
MSA	Date Acquired (1)	Units	Square Feet	December 31, 2018
Orlando 1/2	8/9/2017	653	93,965	85.2%
Jacksonville 1	1/10/2018	521	59,848	87.4%
Atlanta 1	2/2/2018	769	71,718	84.1%
Atlanta 2	2/2/2018	727	66,187	79.2%
Pittsburgh	2/20/2018	582	47,794	32.5%
Charlotte 1	8/31/2018	799	85,350	56.7%
New York City 1	12/21/2018	1,194	105,347	56.2%
Total/Average		5,245	530,209	69.5%	(2)

⁽¹⁾

Refers to the date we acquired our developer partners’ 50.1% interests in the applicable property owning LLC.

⁽²⁾

Represents weighted average occupancy based on total rentable square feet.

Our principal executive offices are located at 6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 650, Memphis, TN 38119. Our principal executive office is leased by our Manager and pursuant to the terms of our Management Agreement, we reimburse our Manager for such office’s rent.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings outside the ordinary course of our business.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “JCAP” on March 27, 2015. On February 28, 2019, the closing sales price for our common stock on the NYSE was $21.45 per share, and there were eleven registered holders of our common stock. The holders of record include Cede & Co., which holds shares as nominee for The Depository Trust Company and which holds shares on behalf of certain of the beneficial owners of our common stock. Such information was obtained through our registrar and transfer agent.

Dividends

Dividends on common stock

Since our IPO, we have paid a regular quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share of our common stock. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and to the extent that it distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income in any taxable year, that it pay tax at regular corporate rates on that undistributed portion. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the characterization of dividends in respect of

Table of Contents

our common stock was 100% return of capital. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the characterization of dividends in respect of our common stock was approximately 8.81% ordinary income and 91.19% return of capital. We intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to our stockholders in an amount equal to or greater than our net taxable income, if and to the extent authorized by our Board of Directors.

We cannot assure our stockholders, however, that the current level of distributions will be sustained, as any distributions that we pay in the future will depend upon our actual results of operations, economic conditions and other factors that could materially alter our expectations. Before we make any distributions, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, we must first meet both our operating requirements and any debt service or other debt payable, and we must comply with covenants in the credit agreement for our Credit Facility or any credit agreement we may execute in the future. Such covenants may restrict or eliminate our ability to pay dividends. If our cash available for distribution is less than our net taxable income, we could be required to use remaining common stock offering net proceeds, issue more common stock or more Series A Preferred Stock, issue shares of other series of preferred stock that may be designated by our Board of Directors, sell assets or borrow funds to make cash distributions or we may make a portion of the required distribution in the form of a taxable stock distribution or distribution of debt securities.

Any distributions we make to our stockholders are at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings, financial condition, liquidity, debt covenants, funding or margin requirements under credit facilities or other secured and unsecured borrowing agreements, maintenance of our REIT qualification, applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. Our earnings, financial condition and liquidity will be affected by various factors, including the net interest and other income from our portfolio, our operating expenses and any other expenditures. See "Item 1A. Risk Factors" included in this annual report on Form 10‑K.

Distributions that stockholders receive (not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) will be taxed as ordinary income to the extent they are paid from our earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes). However, distributions that we designate as capital gain dividends generally will be taxable as long-term capital gain to our stockholders to the extent that they do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year. Some portion of these distributions may not be subject to tax in the year in which they are received because depreciation expense reduces the amount of taxable income, but does not reduce cash available for distribution. The portion of our stockholders distribution that is not designated as a capital gain dividend and is in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits is considered a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes and will reduce the adjusted tax basis of their investment, but not below zero, deferring such portion of their tax until their investment is sold or our company is liquidated, at which time they will be taxed at capital gain rates (subject to certain exceptions for corporate stockholders). To the extent such portion of our stockholders distribution exceeds the adjusted tax basis of their investment, such excess will be treated as capital gain if they hold their shares of common stock as a capital asset for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income for distribution in the following year, and pay any applicable excise tax. We will furnish annually to each of our stockholders a statement setting forth distributions paid during the preceding year and their characterization as ordinary income, return of capital, qualified dividend income or capital gain. Please note that each stockholder’s tax considerations are different; therefore, our stockholders should consult with their own tax advisor and financial planners prior to making an investment in our shares.

Dividends on Series A Preferred Stock

On July 27, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), we entered into the Purchase Agreement relating to the issuance and sale, from time to time until the second anniversary of the Effective Date, of up to $125 million in shares of our Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $1,000 per share (the “Liquidation Value”). Holders of our Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to a cumulative cash distribution (“Cash Distribution”) equal to (A) 7.0% per annum on the Liquidation Value per share of Series A Preferred Stock for the period beginning on the respective date of issuance until the sixth anniversary of the Effective Date, payable quarterly in arrears, (B) 8.5% per annum on the Liquidation Value for the period beginning the day after the sixth anniversary of the Effective Date and for each year thereafter so long as the Series A Preferred Stock remains issued and outstanding, payable quarterly in arrears, and (C) an amount in addition to the amounts in (A) and (B) equal to 5.0% per annum on the Liquidation Value upon the occurrence of certain triggering events (a “Cash Premium”). In addition, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to a cumulative dividend payable in-kind in shares of our common stock or additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock, at the election of the holders (the “Stock Dividend”), equal in the aggregate to the lesser of (Y) 25% of the incremental increase in our book value (as adjusted for equity capital issuances, share repurchases and certain non-cash expenses) plus, to the extent we own equity interests in income-producing real property, the incremental increase in net asset value (provided, however, that no interest in the same real estate asset will be double counted) and (Z) an amount that would, together with the Cash Distribution, result in a 14.0% internal rate of return for the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock from the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, as set forth in the Articles Supplementary

Table of Contents

classifying the Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Articles Supplementary”). For the first three fiscal quarters of the fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020 and for the first fiscal quarter of 2021, we will declare and pay a Series A Aggregate Stock Dividend equal to $2,125,000, or the Series A Target Stock Dividend. For the last fiscal quarter of each of 2018, 2019 and 2020 and for the second fiscal quarter of 2021, we will compute the cumulative Series A Aggregate Stock Dividend for all periods after December 31, 2018 through the end of such fiscal quarter equal to 25% of the incremental increase in our book value (as adjusted for equity capital issuances, share repurchases and certain non-cash expenses) plus, to the extent we own equity interests in income-producing real property, the incremental increase in net asset value (provided, however, that no interest in the same real estate asset will be double counted), or the Series A Computed Stock Dividend, and will declare and pay for such quarter a Series A Aggregate Stock Dividend equal to the greater of the Series A Target Stock Dividend or the Series A Computed Stock Dividend minus the sum of all Series A Aggregate Stock Dividends declared and paid for all fiscal quarters after December 31, 2018 and before the fiscal quarter for which such payment is computed, in each case subject to an amount that would, together with the Series A Cash Distribution, result in a 14.0% internal rate of return for the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock from the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock.

Triggering events that will trigger the payment of a Cash Premium with respect to a Cash Distribution include: (i) the occurrence of certain change of control events affecting the Company after the third anniversary of the Effective Date, (ii) the Company’s ceasing to be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, (iii) the Company’s failure to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust, (iv) an event of default under the Purchase Agreement, (v) the failure by the Company to register for resale shares of our common stock pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement (a “Registration Default”), (vi) the Company’s failure to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock as required by the Purchase Agreement, or (vii) the filing of a complaint, a settlement with, or a judgment entered by the SEC against the Company or any of its subsidiaries or a director or executive officer of the Company relating to the violation of the securities laws, rules or regulations with respect to our business. Accrued but unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will accumulate and will earn additional Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends as calculated above, compounded quarterly.

Distributions on our Series A Preferred Stock for the year ended December 31, 2018 were taxable as approximately 96.12% ordinary income and 3.88% return of capital. Distributions on our Series A Preferred Stock for the year ended December 31, 2017 were taxable as ordinary income.

Dividends on Series B Preferred Stock

Holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if authorized by our Board of Directors and declared by us, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends under Maryland law, cumulative cash dividends from, and including, the original issue date quarterly in arrears on the fifteenth (15th) day of January, April, July and October of each year (or if not a business day, on the immediately preceding business day) (each, a “dividend payment date”). These cumulative cash dividends will accrue on the liquidation preference amount of $25.00 per share at a rate per annum equal to 7.00% with respect to each dividend period from and including the original issue date (equivalent to an annual rate of $1.7500 per share) from the date of issuance of such Series B Preferred Stock. Dividends will be payable to holders of record as of 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the related record date. The record dates for the Series B Preferred Stock are the close of business on the first (1st) day of January, April, July or October immediately preceding the relevant dividend payment date (each, a “dividend record date”). If any dividend record date falls on any day other than a business day as defined in the Series B Articles Supplementary, the dividend record date shall be the immediately succeeding business day.

Distributions on our Series B Preferred Stock for the year ended December 31, 2018 were taxable as approximately 96.12% ordinary income and 3.88% return of capital.

Stockholder Return Performance

The following graph is a comparison of the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock against the Russell 2000 Index and the SNL U.S. Finance REIT Index, a peer group index, from March 27, 2015 (the date which our shares began trading in connection with our IPO) to December 31, 2018. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on March 27, 2015 in our common stock, the Russell 2000 Index and the SNL U.S. Finance REIT Index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions. There can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue to be in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the following graph. The information in this paragraph and the following graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, other than as provided in Item 201 of Regulation S-K, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it by reference into a filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

Table of Contents



	Period Ending
	3/27/2015		12/31/2015		12/31/2016		12/31/2017		12/31/2018
JCAP	$	100.00	$	78.01	$	119.29	$	115.09	$	129.03
Russell 2000 Index	$	100.00	$	92.56	$	112.28	$	128.72	$	114.55
SNL U.S. Finance REIT Index	$	100.00	$	89.25	$	109.94	$	128.28	$	123.31

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Repurchases of Common Stock

The following table provides information about repurchases of our common shares during the three months ended December 31, 2018:


							Maximum Dollar
					Total Number of		Value
	Total				Shares Purchased		that May Yet Be
	Number of		Average		as Part of Publicly		Purchased Under the
	Shares		Price Paid		Announced Plans or		Plans or Programs (1)
	Purchased		Per Share		Programs		(dollars in thousands)
October 1 - October 31		—	$	—		—	$	6,848
November 1 - November 30		—		—		—		6,848
December 1 - December 31		—		—		—		6,848
Total		—	$	—		—	$	6,848

⁽¹⁾

On May 23, 2016, we announced a program permitting us to repurchase a portion of our outstanding common stock not to exceed a dollar maximum of $10.0 million established by our Board of Directors.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data set forth below has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. This data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(dollars in thousands)



	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017		2016		2015
Operating Data:
Total revenues	$	31,214	$	12,191	$	6,532	$	1,743
Total operating expenses		(20,139)		(10,048)		(9,684)		(5,705)
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture		1,483		2,263		1,278		-
Realized gain on investments		619		-		-		-
Net unrealized gain on investments		42,945		10,804		18,370		872
Interest expense		(2,155)		(1,053)		(559)		-
Loss on modification of debt		-		(232)		-		-
Other interest income		399		634		80		147
Net income (loss)		54,366		14,559		16,017		(2,943)
Net income attributable to preferred stockholders		(18,014)		(1,456)		(996)		-
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	36,352	$	13,103	$	15,021	$	(2,943)

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders	$	2.10	$	1.10	$	2.42	$	(0.69)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders	$	2.10	$	1.10	$	2.42	$	(0.69)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		17,111,035		11,735,455		6,060,100		4,504,356
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted		17,284,160		11,908,512		6,212,648		4,504,356

Dividends declared per share of stock	$	1.40	$	1.40	$	1.40	$	1.05

Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,715	$	46,977	$	67,373	$	43,859
Development property investments at fair value		373,564		228,233		95,102		40,222
Bridge investments at fair value		84,383		-		-		-
Operating property loans at fair value		-		5,938		9,905		19,600
Self-storage real estate owned, net		96,202		15,355		-		-
Investment in and advances to real estate venture		14,155		13,856		5,373		-
Total assets		590,408		314,634		192,779		105,427
Senior loan participations		-		718		18,582		-
Secured revolving credit facility		-		-		-		-
Term loans, net of unamortized costs		24,609		-		-		-
Total liabilities		42,544		8,814		24,417		3,663
Total equity		547,864		305,820		168,362		101,764

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes included under “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this annual report on Form 10‑K.

Overview

We are a commercial real estate company that invests primarily in new or recently-constructed and opened self-storage facilities located predominately in dense urban submarkets within large United States MSAs. Facilities in which we invest are largely vertical (three to ten floors), 100% climate controlled and technologically adapted buildings, which we call Generation V facilities. These facilities are located in submarkets with demographic profiles and competitive positions that management believes will support successful lease-up of such facilities and value creation for our stockholders. Our investments include mortgage loans typically coupled with equity interests as well as outright ownership of self-storage facilities.

Our principal business objective is to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns by investing in new Generation V self-storage facilities primarily in urban submarkets. A substantial majority of our investments to date have been first mortgage loans to finance ground-up construction of and conversion of existing buildings into new Generation V self-storage facilities. These investments, which we refer to as “development property investments,” are structured as loans equal to between 90% and 97% of facility costs (including land, pre-development and other “soft” costs, hard construction costs, fees and interest and operating reserves). We receive a fixed rate of interest on loaned amounts and up to a 49.9% interest in the positive cash flows from operations, sales and/or refinancings of self-storage facilities, which we refer to as “Profits Interest”. We also typically receive a ROFR to acquire the self-storage facility upon sale.

In addition to the foregoing, we intend to acquire self-storage facilities that we have financed either through the exercise of ROFRs or through privately negotiated transactions with our investment counterparties, subject to acquisition prices being consistent with our investment objective to create long-term value for our stockholders. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we acquired the 50.1% equity interests of our developer partners in the LLCs that own our Jacksonville 1, Atlanta 1, Atlanta 2, Pittsburgh, Charlotte 1, and New York City 1 development properties. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired the 50.1% equity interests of our developer partner in the LLCs that own our Orlando 1 and Orlando 2 development property investments, which are two self-storage facilities adjacent to each other. We now own 100% of the membership interests in the LLCs that own these seven facilities and fully consolidate these facilities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

We generally fund our on-balance sheet investments with (i) proceeds from sales of our securities, including sales of our common stock and our Series B Preferred Stock in follow-on offerings and pursuant to our ATM Program and our Preferred ATM Program, (ii) funds from secured indebtedness, including borrowings under our $235 million Credit Facility and term loans on individual properties, and (iii) net proceeds from the monetization of existing development property investments. In the past we also have used proceeds from the sale of senior participations and the sale of our Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which we issued $125 million of Series A Preferred Stock.

On March 7, 2016, we, through our Operating Company, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of the SL1 Venture with HVP III, an investment vehicle managed by Heitman. The SL1 Venture was formed for the purpose of providing capital to developers of self-storage facilities identified and underwritten by us. Upon formation, HVP III committed $110.0 million for a 90% interest in the SL1 Venture, and we

Table of Contents

committed $12.2 million for a 10% interest. On March 31, 2016, we contributed to the SL1 Venture three self-storage development investments with an aggregate commitment amount of $41.9 million. As of December 31, 2018, the SL1 Venture had closed on eight additional development property investments with a Profits Interest with an aggregate commitment amount of approximately $81.4 million, bringing the total aggregate commitment of SL1 Venture’s investments to $123.3 million as of December 31, 2018.

We are externally managed and advised by JCAP Advisors, LLC. The Manager is led by our founder and Executive Chairman, Dean Jernigan, our CEO, John A. Good and our President and CIO, Jonathan Perry. Mr. Jernigan is a 30‑year veteran of the self-storage industry, including a combined 16 years as the Chief Executive Officer of Storage USA and CubeSmart, both NYSE listed self-storage REITs. During his time at these two companies, Mr. Jernigan oversaw the investment of over $3 billion of capital in the self-storage industry. Mr. Good has over 30 years of experience working with senior management teams and boards of directors of public companies in the REIT and financial services industries on corporate finance, corporate governance, merger and acquisition, tax, executive compensation, joint venture, and strategic planning projects as a nationally recognized corporate and securities lawyer. Prior to joining the Company, he served as lead counsel on over 200 securities offerings, including our IPO, raising in excess of $25 billion over the past 25 years, with more than 125 of those deals being in the REIT industry. Mr. Perry has over 20 years of experience in the self-storage sector having joined the Company in June 2018 from CubeSmart, where he most recently served as Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Perry has led several billion dollars of self-storage investments and transactions over his career and has established extensive relationships across the industry. We believe the industry experience and depth of relationships of our senior management team and other investment professionals provide us with a significant competitive advantage in sourcing, evaluating, underwriting and servicing self-storage investments.

We are a Maryland corporation that was organized on October 1, 2014 that has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gains, to the extent that we annually distribute all of our REIT taxable income to stockholders and comply with certain other requirements for qualification as a REIT set forth in the Code. We are structured as an UPREIT and conduct our investment activities through our Operating Company. We also intend to operate our business in a manner that will permit us to maintain our exemption from registration under the 1940 Act.

Factors Impacting Our Operating Results

The results of our operations have historically been affected, and will continue to be affected, by a number of factors including, among other things:

the pace at which we are able to deploy capital into development property investments and begin earning interest income, which pace can be dependent on the timing of government issuance of building permits, weather and other factors outside our control;

the timing of the completion of facilities we finance, which can be dependent on the inspection process of municipal building departments that are from time to time understaffed;

the pace and strength of the lease-up of the facilities we finance;

availability of capital and whether investments are made on-balance sheet or through off-balance sheet joint ventures;

changes in the fair value of our assets;

our ability to acquire self-storage facilities at attractive prices; and

the performance of self-storage facilities in which we have invested, either directly or through the SL1 Venture.

As the current development cycle nears its end, we believe that developers who constructed new self-storage facilities earlier in the cycle will seek to sell their ownership positions or seek to recapitalize existing financing. We believe our current developer partners and other developers with whom we do not currently have financing relationships will be seeking early exits from their development projects, providing opportunities for us to acquire new Generation V self-storage facilities in the lease-up phase. Further, we believe our willingness and desire to make structured bridge investments will be an attractive capital solution to developers with a need or desire to recapitalize their investments, repay debt, buy out partners or provide capital needed to stabilize facilities. We intend to pursue bridge investments of recently built self-storage facilities in lease-up phase, selectively evaluate acquisitions of our current developer partners’ membership interests in projects that we have financed and selectively evaluate acquisitions of self-storage projects that we have not financed. As our focus shifts to acquiring the newly-developed facilities that we have financed since our IPO, acquiring properties that we have not financed and refinancing newly

Table of Contents

completed facilities, our results of operations will also be impacted by the following additional factors, in addition to the factors described above:

our ability to generate these new types of investment opportunities while at the same time managing our existing pipeline of development investment opportunities;

our ability to offer flexible transaction structures that meet the needs of developers while at the same time providing us with returns commensurate with the risks taken;

emphasis on current interest income, net rental income and/or net operating income and less emphasis on fair value accretion; and

our ability to access debt and equity capital at a cost commensurate with the returns from bridge investments and outright ownership of self-storage facilities.

Our total investment income includes interest income from loan investments, which also reflects the accretion of origination fees, and is recognized utilizing the effective interest method based on the contractual rate and the outstanding principal balance of the loans we originate. The objective of the effective interest method is to arrive at periodic interest income that yields a level rate of return over the loan term. Interest rates may vary according to the type of loan, conditions in the financial markets, creditworthiness of our borrowers, competition and other factors, none of which can be predicted with any certainty. Our operating results may also be impacted by credit losses in excess of initial anticipations or unanticipated credit events experienced by borrowers. Our income also includes earnings from our investment in the SL1 Venture, which is calculated based on the allocation of earnings as prescribed in the JV Agreement. In addition, our operating results are affected by the valuation of our development property investments and bridge investments. These investments are marked to fair value each quarter, and increases and decreases in fair value are reflected in the carrying values of the investments in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and as unrealized increases/decreases in fair value in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. We have made, and in the future we may make, additional equity investments in self-storage facilities, either for fee simple ownership by our Operating Company or in joint ventures with our developers, institutional or other strategic partners. In that regard, in connection with many of our development investments, we have obtained rights of first refusal in connection with potential future sales of self-storage facilities that we finance. Our operating results include rental income and related operating expenses from owned self-storage facilities. Our results for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 also were impacted by our accounting methods as discussed below.

Changes in Fair Value of Our Assets

We have elected the fair value option of accounting for our development property investments and bridge investments. We have elected fair value accounting for these financial instruments because we believe such accounting provides stockholders and others who rely on our financial statements with a more complete and accurate understanding of our economic performance, including our revenues and the creation of value through our Profits Interests as self-storage facilities we finance are constructed, leased-up and become stabilized. Under the fair value option, we mark our development property investments, bridge investments and operating property loans to estimated fair value at the end of each accounting period, with corresponding increases or decreases in fair value being reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. There is no active secondary market for our development property investments, bridge investments and operating property loans and no readily available market value; accordingly, our determination of fair value requires judgment and extensive use of estimates. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our development property investments and bridge investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of our development property investments and bridge investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize. Our development property investments and bridge investments are generally subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded securities. If we were required to liquidate an investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded it. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the unrealized gains or losses reflected in the valuations currently assigned.

Changes in Market Interest Rates

With respect to our business operations, increases in interest rates, in general, may over time cause: the interest expense associated with our borrowings to increase; the value of mortgage loans in our investment portfolio to decline; interest rates on any floating rate loans to reset, although on a delayed basis, to higher interest rates; and to the extent we enter into interest rate swap agreements as part of our hedging strategy, the value of these agreements to increase. Conversely, decreases in interest rates, in general, may over time cause: the interest expense associated with our borrowings to decrease; the value of mortgage loans in our investment portfolio to increase; interest rates on any floating

Table of Contents

rate loans to reset, although on a delayed basis, to lower interest rates; and to the extent we enter into interest rate swap agreements as part of our hedging strategy, the value of these agreements to decrease.

Credit Risk

We are subject to varying degrees of credit risk in connection with our target investments and other loans. Our Manager seeks to mitigate this risk by seeking to originate or acquire loans of higher quality at appropriate prices given anticipated and unanticipated losses, by utilizing a comprehensive selection, underwriting and due diligence review process, and by proactively monitoring originated or acquired loans. Although we expect that our borrowers will perform in full on their obligations under the loan documents, one of our underwriting principles is that we will generally not make a loan secured by a property that we, at the time of our investment decision, do not wish to ultimately own and operate. We believe this principle and our ability to effectively own and operate self-storage properties mitigates credit risk. Nevertheless, unanticipated credit losses could occur that could adversely impact our operating results.

Market Conditions

We believe that present conditions in certain markets continue to be conducive to realizing attractive risk-adjusted returns on investments in self-storage facilities owned by private operators. The self-storage sector has experienced substantially higher new self-storage construction starts and deliveries during 2016, 2017 and 2018, and 2019 is expected to experience new deliveries at levels similar to 2018, which was the highest year for new deliveries in this development cycle. The key demand drivers of the self-storage sector include population mobility and new job creation, both of which are experiencing increases since the 2009/2010 recession, as well as population growth. These drivers have created demand for self-storage, which in turn have developers looking to develop and match demand with supply. The main deterrents for developers are government regulations (primarily zoning restrictions), lack of land and the lack of financing available in the sector. Typically, lenders are only willing to lend up to 65% LTC, whereas our substantial industry knowledge enables us to make loans at ratios of approximately 90% LTC. In certain situations, we will advance more than 90% of cost and receive a higher rate of interest, some of which will be received as PIK interest rather than cash interest.

Recent Developments

Investment Activity

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we closed on the following development property investment with a Profits Interest:



		Total Investment
Closing Date	MSA	Commitment
3/1/2019	New York City 6	$	18,796
	Total	$	18,796

New York City 6, a proposed new-build climate controlled self-storage project, will consist of 856 units with approximately 76,250 net rentable square feet. The project will be located at 441 Tompkins Ave., Staten Island, NY 10305. The project will serve a submarket with over 200,000 potential customers and just over two feet per capita of self-storage supply. Construction is expected to begin in the third quarter of 2019 and be completed in the fourth quarter of 2020. Structure Development, LLC is the developer of the proposed project. This will be the seventh development project in which the Company and Structure have invested.

Capital Activities

As of December 31, 2018, we had no borrowings under our Credit Facility. As of February 28, 2019, we had $21.0 million outstanding of our $118.0 million in total availability under the Credit Facility.

Table of Contents

On January 18, 2019, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement with respect to a term loan with a principal amount of $9.2 million. This loan is secured by a first mortgage on our wholly-owned self-storage facility located in Charlotte, North Carolina. As a condition to the lender providing the loan, we have agreed to unconditionally guarantee our subsidiary’s obligations under the loan pursuant to guaranty agreements with the lender.

First Quarter Dividend Declarations

On February 22, 2019, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and a distribution payable in kind, if applicable, in a number of shares of common stock or Series A Preferred Stock as determined in accordance with the election of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock for the quarter ending March 31, 2019. The dividends are payable on April 15, 2019 to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on April 1, 2019.

On February 22, 2019, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on the Series B Preferred Stock in the amount of $0.4375 per share for the quarter ending March 31, 2019. The dividends are payable on April 15, 2019 to holders of Series B Preferred Stock of record on April 1, 2019.

On February 22, 2019, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.35 per share of common stock for the quarter ending March 31, 2019. The dividend is payable on April 15, 2019 to stockholders of record on April 1, 2019.

Business Outlook and Trends

We continue to experience demand for our capital for the development of state-of-the-art Class A self-storage facilities in top U.S. markets. As of February 28, 2019, we had projects that were in various stages of our underwriting process, including several subject to executed term sheets, for prospective development property investment amounts in excess of $350 million. Over the past 18 months, we have reduced our pipeline intentionally, as the development cycle is now entering its fifth year. Having evaluated over $11 billion of potential self-storage development projects since our formation in March 2015 while closing approximately $900 million, we believe we have demonstrated a track record of careful underwriting and selectivity. While we typically estimate closing dates for investment transactions subject to executed term sheets, often the closings of such investments are subject to events, such as site plan approval, issuances of building permits and other occurrences outside of our control, which can result in delays beyond our estimated closing dates. Moreover, we can provide no assurance that any of the existing or future projects subject to term sheets will produce actual investment commitments or if all term sheets will meet all conditions necessary to consummate investment commitments, and we can provide no assurance that we will have adequate capital to close all such prospective commitments in the future.

From the time of our IPO in March 2015 through December 31, 2015, we committed an aggregate of approximately $76.5 million in 11 development property investments. As of December 31, 2018, all of the properties underlying these development investments had received certificates of occupancy. Of those 11 initial investments, we have acquired our developer’s interest in six investments and chose not to exercise our ROFR to buy the storage facility underlying one investment.

During the period January 1 through August 31, 2016, we made no on-balance sheet development property investments, with all such investments being made through the SL1 Venture pursuant to the terms of our joint venture agreement executed in March 2016. We have a 10% capital interest in the SL1 Venture that entitles us to 10% of operating earnings and profits from sales of properties by the joint venture, as well as potential residual interests upon our SL1 Venture partners achieving certain internal rates of return on their invested capital. As of December 31, 2018, all of those development properties had achieved substantial construction completion or certificates of occupancy. On January 28, 2019, the SL1 Venture acquired our developer’s interest in four of these investments.

From the second half of 2016 through the end of 2018, we invested solely on-balance sheet, closing 44 development property investments with a Profits Interest and five bridge investments with aggregate committed principal of $535.4 million and $83.3 million, respectively. Of these 44 development property investments with a Profits Interest, two opened for leasing in 2017, 16 opened for leasing in 2018, 16 are expected to open for leasing in 2019, and 10 are expected to open for leasing in 2020.

The construction progress and deliveries of these on-balance sheet investments contributed to significant fair value appreciation in 2018 in excess of that recognized in 2017. As the number of deliveries decrease in 2019 and 2020, we would expect fair value appreciation in these years to decrease as compared to 2018. Furthermore, fair value appreciation recognized during lease-up can be negatively impacted by lower rental rates due to supply saturation in some markets, which we have experienced and expect to continue to experience. In addition, our

Table of Contents

acquisition of our developers’ interests is expected to continue into 2019 and even more so into 2020, which could also negatively impact future profits as fair value appreciation is not recognized after the acquisition date.

We intend to acquire self-storage facilities that we have financed either through the exercise of ROFRs or through privately negotiated transactions with our investment counterparties, subject to acquisition prices being consistent with our investment objective to create long-term value for our stockholders. Since the third quarter of 2017, we have acquired seven self-storage facilities through privately negotiated transactions with our developer partners.

As of December 31, 2018, we currently have seven self-storage facilities that are wholly-owned and consolidated on our balance sheet, 46 on-balance sheet development property investments with a Profits Interest (20 of which are secured by facilities in lease-up and 26 of which are secured by facilities under construction), 11 development property investments in our SL1 Venture (10 of which are secured by facilities in lease-up and one of which is secured by a facility where construction is substantially complete) and five bridge investments secured by facilities that are all in lease-up. We also have one construction loan secured by a facility under construction.

The following table reflects occupancy data as of February 24, 2019 for the 37 underlying self-storage facilities of our development property investments with a Profits Interest and seven wholly-owned properties that have received a certificate of occupancy as of that date:



		# Months
Location	Date Opened	Open		Occupancy
Ocoee, Florida (Orlando 1 and Orlando 2) (1)	May 1, 2016		34		86.1	%
Marietta, Georgia (Atlanta 2) (1)	May 24, 2016		33		79.9	%
Alpharetta, Georgia (Atlanta 1) (1)	May 25, 2016		33		86.0	%
Jacksonville, Florida (Jacksonville 1) (1)	August 12, 2016		30		88.8	%
Charlotte, North Carolina (Charlotte 1) (1)	August 18, 2016		30		57.6	%
Milwaukee, Wisconsin	October 9, 2016 (2)		29		63.2	%
New Haven, Connecticut	December 16, 2016		26		67.0	%
Round Rock, Texas (Austin)	March 16, 2017		23		70.1	%
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (1)	May 11, 2017 (3)		21		32.8	%
Jacksonville, Florida (4)	July 26, 2017		19		79.0	%
Columbia, South Carolina (4)	August 23, 2017		18		56.3	%
Atlanta, Georgia (Atlanta 2) (4)	September 14, 2017		17		53.4	%
Washington DC (4)	September 25, 2017		17		59.4	%
New York, New York (New York City 1) (1)	September 29, 2017		17		58.4	%
Denver, Colorado (4)	December 14, 2017		14		51.6	%
Miami, Florida (Miami 1) (4)	February 23, 2018		12		44.7	%
Average (Facilities open for more than 1 year)			23.4		64.9	%	(5)



		# Months
Location	Date Opened	Open		Occupancy
Raleigh, North Carolina	March 8, 2018		12		33.5	%
Jacksonville, Florida (Jacksonville 2)	March 27, 2018		11		36.6	%
Atlanta, Georgia (Atlanta 1) (4)	April 12, 2018		10		35.0	%
Raleigh, North Carolina (4)	June 8, 2018		9		24.2	%
Atlanta, Georgia (Atlanta 4)	July 12, 2018		7		13.2	%
Orlando, Florida (Orlando 3)	July 26, 2018		7		18.6	%
Fort Lauderdale, Florida (4)	July 26, 2018		7		24.3	%
Denver, Colorado (Denver 2)	July 31, 2018		7		16.1	%
Boston, Massachusetts (Boston 1)	August 8, 2018		7		12.4	%
Louisville, Kentucky (Louisville 1)	August 15, 2018		6		23.2	%
Charlotte, North Carolina (Charlotte 2)	August 30, 2018		6		15.1	%
Louisville, Kentucky (Louisville 2)	August 31, 2018		6		12.5	%
Tampa, Florida (Tampa 4)	October 9, 2018		5		11.2	%
Atlanta, Georgia (Atlanta 6)	October 15, 2018		4		18.5	%

Table of Contents

Miami, Florida (Miami 2) (4)	October 30, 2018	4	27.3	%
Jacksonville, Florida (Jacksonville 3)	November 6, 2018	4	12.2	%
Baltimore, Maryland (Baltimore 1)	November 20, 2018	3	4.7	%
Tampa, Florida (Tampa 3)	November 29, 2018	3	8.6	%
Knoxville, Tennessee	November 30, 2018	3	14.9	%
New Orleans, Louisiana	December 21, 2018	2	5.1	%
New York, New York (New York City 2)	December 28, 2018	2	1.6	%
Average (Facilities open for less than 1 year)		5.8	17.4	%	(5)

⁽¹⁾

As of December 31, 2018, we wholly own the self-storage facility underlying this investment.

⁽²⁾

Certificate of Occupancy was received in August 2016, prior to the property being ready for opening by the manager of the project. Property opened to partial leasing in October 2016. All floors opened to leasing in February 2017.

⁽³⁾

Temporary Certificate of Occupancy was received and reservations of units were allowed, but tenant move-ins commenced when final Certificate of Occupancy was issued in July 2017.

⁽⁴⁾

Investment is included in SL1 Venture portfolio.

⁽⁵⁾

Represents weighted average occupancy based on total rentable square feet.

The following table reflects occupancy data as of February 24, 2019 for all of the underlying self-storage facilities of our bridge investments with a Profits Interest that have received a certificate of occupancy:



		# Months
Location	Date Opened	Open		Occupancy
Miami, Florida (Miami 6)	August 12, 2016		30		78.8	%
Miami, Florida (Miami 4)	October 9, 2016		29		81.4	%
Miami, Florida (Miami 8)	December 12, 2016		26		83.6	%
Miami, Florida (Miami 7)	March 26, 2018		11		36.0	%
Miami, Florida (Miami 5)	August 13, 2018		6		19.2	%
Average			20.5		57.4	%	(1)

⁽¹⁾

Represents weighted average occupancy based on total rentable square feet.

The occupancy rates noted above pertain to the aforementioned 42 properties only and are not indicative of future lease-up rates of other facilities that will commence operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions that involve the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions and assessments that could affect our reported assets and liabilities, as well as our reported revenues and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions and assessments used to prepare our financial statements are based upon reasonable assumptions given the information available to us at that time. Those accounting policies and estimates that we believe are most critical to an investor’s understanding of our financial results and condition and require complex management judgment are discussed below.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Variable Interest Entities

We invest in entities that may qualify as variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is a legal entity that lacks one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A VIE is defined as an entity in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE includes both a qualitative and quantitative analysis. We base the qualitative analysis on our review of the design of the entity, our organizational structure including allocation of decision-making authority and relevant financial

Table of Contents

agreements and the quantitative analysis on the forecasted cash flow of the entity. We reassess the initial evaluation of an entity as a VIE upon the occurrence of certain reconsideration events.

A VIE must be consolidated only by its primary beneficiary, which is defined as the party that, along with its affiliates and agents, has both the: (i) power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) obligation to absorb the losses of the VIE or the right to receive the benefits from the VIE, which could be significant to the VIE. We determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE by considering qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and which party controls such activities; the amount and characteristics of its investment; the obligation or likelihood for the Company or other interests to provide financial support; consideration of the VIE’s purpose and design, including the risks the VIE was designed to create and pass through to its variable interest holders and the similarity with and significance to our business activities and the other interests. We reassess the determination of whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE each reporting period.

Fair Value Measurements

The fair value option under ASC 825, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825‑10”), allows companies to elect to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. We have elected the fair value option of accounting for our development property investments, bridge investments and operating property loan investments in order to provide our stockholders and others who rely on our financial statements with a more complete and accurate understanding of our economic performance, including our revenues and value inherent in our equity participation in self-storage development projects.

We apply ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an investment in a current sale, which assumes an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 requires us to assume that the investment is sold in its principal market to market participants or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact. In accordance with ASC 820, we consider our principal market as the market for the purchase and sale of self-storage properties, which we believe would be the most likely market for our loan and equity investments given the nature of the collateral securing such loans and the types of borrowers. ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. In accordance with ASC 820, these inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1‑	Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market.

Level 2‑	Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on the following: (i) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (ii) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets; (iii) Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3‑	Prices or valuation techniques based on inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The carrying values of cash, other loans, receivables, the secured revolving credit facility, term loans, senior loan participation and payables approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature or due to a variable interest rate. Cash, receivables, and payables are categorized as Level 1 instruments in the measurement of fair value. Other loans, the secured revolving credit facility, term loans and senior loan participations are categorized as Level 2 instruments in the measurement of fair value as the fair values of these investments are determined using a discounted cash flow model with inputs from third-party pricing sources and similar instruments. The following table summarizes the instruments categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure their fair value.



Instrument	Valuation technique and assumptions	Hierarchy classification

Development property investments	Valuations are determined using an Income Approach analysis, using the discounted cash flow method model, capturing the prepayment penalty / call price schedule as applicable. The valuation models are calibrated to the total investment net drawn amount as of the issuance date.	Level 3

Table of Contents

Development property investments with a profits interest and bridge investments (a)	Valuations are determined using an Income Approach analysis, using the discounted cash flow method model, capturing the prepayment penalty / call price schedule as applicable. The valuation models are calibrated to the total investment net drawn amount as of the issuance date factoring in the value of the Profits Interests. Typically, the calibration is done on an investment level basis. In certain instances, we may acquire a portfolio of investments in which case the calibration is done on an aggregate basis to the aggregate net drawn amount as of the date of issuance.	Level 3

	An option-pricing method ("OPM") framework is utilized to calculate the value of the Profits Interests. At certain stages in the investments life cycle (as described subsequently), the OPM requires an enterprise value derived from fair value of the underlying real estate project. The fair value of the underlying real estate project is determined using either a discounted cash flows model or direct capitalization approach. We engaged a third-party independent valuation firm to perform certain limited procedures that we identified and requested the independent valuation firm to perform. The analysis performed by the independent valuation firm was based upon data and assumptions provided to it by us and received from third party sources. The independent valuation firm relied on certain data and assumptions provided to it by us as being accurate while independently verifying others through the use of third party sources. Upon completion of the limited procedures, the independent valuation firm concluded that the fair value of investments subjected to the limited procedures appears to be reasonable. We are ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of the investments on a quarterly basis in good faith.

Operating property loans	Valuations are determined using an Income Approach analysis, using the discounted cash flow method model, capturing the prepayment penalty / call price schedule as applicable.	Level 3

^(a)

Certain of our development property investments include Profits Interests.

Our development property investments, bridge investments and operating property loan investments are valued using two different valuation techniques. The first valuation technique is an income approach analysis of the debt instrument components of our investments. The second valuation technique is an OPM that is used to determine the fair value of any Profits Interests associated with an investment. The valuation models are calibrated to the total investment net drawn amount as of the issuance date factoring in the value of the Profits Interests. At the issuance date of each development property investment, generally the value of the property underlying such investment approximates the sum of the net investment drawn amount plus the developer’s equity investment. Typically the calibration is done on an investment level basis. To the extent investments are entered into on a portfolio basis, the valuation models are calibrated on an aggregate basis to the aggregate net investment proceeds using the overall implied internal rate of return using a discounted cash flow for each investment.

Table of Contents

development property investments that were 40% complete but for which construction was not substantially complete at December 31, 2018, we have estimated the entrepreneurial profit adjustment to the enterprise value input used in the OPM to be equal to one-third of the estimated entrepreneurial profit, allocated on a straight-line basis. Twenty-seven development property and bridge investments, not including the properties reported as self-storage real estate owned, had reached substantial construction completion and/or received a certificate of occupancy at December 31, 2018. For our development property and bridge investments at substantial construction completion, a discounted cash flow model, based on periodically updated estimates of rental rates, occupancy and operating expenses, is the primary method for projecting value of a project. We also will consider inputs such as appraisals which differ from the developer’s equity investment, bona fide third-party offers to purchase development projects, sales of development projects, or sales of comparable properties in its markets.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs we used to value our investments categorized within Level 3 as of December 31, 2018. The table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead to capture the significant unobservable inputs relevant to our determination of fair values.


As of December 31, 2018
		Unobservable Inputs
	Primary Valuation			Weighted
Asset Category	Techniques	Input	Estimated Range	Average

Development property	Income approach analysis	Market yields/discount rate	4.72 - 13.09%	9.48%
investments and bridge investments (a)		Exit date (d)	2.25 - 5.95 years	3.44 years

Development property	Option pricing model	Volatility	53.25 - 94.30%	75.10%
investments with a profits interest		Exit date (d)	2.25 - 5.95 years	3.44 years
and bridge investments (b)		Capitalization rate (c)	4.75 - 6.00%	5.42%
		Discount rate (c)	7.75 - 11.74%	8.83%

^(a)

The valuation technique for the development property investments with a Profits Interest does not differ from the development property investments without a Profits Interest. Therefore, this line item focuses on all development property investments, including those with a Profits Interest. The significant unobservable inputs associated with the construction loan presented as a development property investment are not included as the fair value was determined based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. The fair value of the underlying collateral was determined using a market comparable approach and an income approach based on a capitalization rate within the range provided above for capitalization rates associated with development property investments with a profits interest.

^(b)

The valuation technique for the development property investments with a Profits Interest does not differ from the development property investments without a Profits Interest. The development property investments with a Profits Interest only require incremental valuation techniques to determine the value of the Profits Interest. Therefore this line only focuses on the Profits Interest valuation.

^(c)

Thirty-five properties were 40% - 100% complete, thus requiring a capitalization rate and/or discount rate to derive entrepreneurial profit, which are used to derive the enterprise value input to the OPM. Capitalization rates are estimated based on current data derived from independent sources in the markets in which we hold investments.

^(d)

The exit dates for the development property investments and bridge investments are generally the estimated date of stabilization of the underlying property.

The fair value measurements are sensitive to changes in unobservable inputs. A change in those inputs to a different amount might result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The following provides a discussion of the impact of changes in each of the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurement.

Table of Contents

Market yields - changes in market yields and discount rates, each in isolation, may change the fair value of certain of our investments. Generally, an increase in market yields or discount rates may result in a decrease in the fair value of certain of our investments. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the following fluctuations in the market yields/discount rates would have had the following impact on the fair value of our investments:


Change in market yields/discount rates (in millions)	Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments
Up 25 basis points	$	(1.9)
Down 25 basis points, subject to a minimum yield/rate of 10 basis points		2.0

Up 50 basis points		(3.9)
Down 50 basis points, subject to a minimum yield/rate of 10 basis points		4.1

Capitalization rate - changes in capitalization rate, in isolation and all else equal, may change the fair value of certain of our development investments containing Profits Interests. Generally an increase in the capitalization rate assumption may result in a decrease in the fair value of certain of our investments. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the following fluctuations in the capitalization rates would have had the following impact on the fair value of our investments:


Change in capitalization rates (in millions)	Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments
Up 25 basis points	$	(8.9)
Down 25 basis points		9.8

Up 50 basis points		(17.0)
Down 50 basis points		20.5

Exit date - changes in exit date, in isolation and all else equal, may change the fair value of certain of our investments that have Profits Interests. Generally, an acceleration in the exit date assumption may result in an increase in the fair value of our investments.

Volatility - changes in volatility, in isolation and all else equal, may change the fair value of certain of our investments that have Profits Interests. Generally, an increase in volatility may result in an increase in the fair value of the Profits Interests in certain of our investments.

Operating cash flow projections - changes in the operating cash flow projections of the underlying self-storage facilities, in isolation and all else equal, may change the fair value of certain of our investments that have Profits Interests. Generally, an increase in operating cash flow projections may result in an increase in the fair value of the Profits Interests in certain of our investments.

We also evaluate the impact of changes in instrument-specific credit risk in determining the fair value of investments. At December 31, 2018, there were no gains or losses attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk.

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize. Further, such investments are generally subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded securities. If we are required to liquidate an investment in a forced or liquidation sale, it could realize significantly less than the value at which we had recorded it. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the unrealized gains or losses reflected in the valuations currently assigned.

Table of Contents

The following table presents changes in investments that use Level 3 inputs for the year ended December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):



Balance as of December 31, 2017	$	234,171
Realized gains		(619)
Unrealized gains		43,564
Fundings of principal and change in unamortized origination fees		257,454
Repayments of loans		(33,047)
Payment-in-kind interest		22,814
Reclassification of self-storage real estate owned		(66,390)
Net transfers in or out of Level 3		-
Balance as of December 31, 2018	$	457,947

On August 28, 2018, the underlying asset for the Tampa 1 investment was sold to a third party and proceeds were distributed to us in settlement of the first mortgage loan and 49.9% Profits Interest. The following tables reflect the various financial components related to the transaction:


Tampa 1 investment as of June 30, 2018:
Fair value of investment	$	5,931
Funded investment, net of unamortized origination fee		5,260
Unrealized gain recorded as of June 30, 2018	$	671

Cash received on third party sale	$	6,010
Funded investment		(5,285)
Value realized		725
Unrealized gain recorded as of June 30, 2018		(671)
Income realized in excess of unrealized gain previously recorded	$	54


Value realized:			Classification in Statement of Operations
Profits interest	$	619	Realized gain on investments
Prepayment penalty		106	Interest income on investments
	$	725

As of December 31, 2018, the total net unrealized appreciation on the investments that use Level 3 inputs was $51.0 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, substantially all of the net unrealized gain on investments in our Consolidated Statement of Operations was attributable to unrealized gains relating to our Level 3 assets still held as of December 31, 2018.

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the quarter in which the transfers occur.

Self-Storage Real Estate Owned

Land is carried at historical cost. Building and improvements are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The cost primarily reflects the funded principal balance of the loan to us, net of unamortized origination fees, unrealized appreciation recognized as of the acquisition date, and the cash consideration paid to acquire the developer’s equity interest and portion of Profits Interest. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The costs of building and improvements are generally depreciated using the straight-line method based on a useful life of 40 years.

We expect that the majority of future self-storage facility acquisitions will be considered asset acquisitions; however, we will evaluate each acquisition using Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018‑01 - Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business to determine whether accounting for a business combination or asset acquisition applies.

When facilities are acquired, the cost is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on relative fair values. Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon their relative fair values as estimated by management.

Table of Contents

In allocating the purchase price for an acquisition, we determine whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities. We allocate a portion of the cost to an intangible asset attributable to the value of in-place leases. This intangible asset is amortized to expense over the expected remaining term of the respective leases, which is generally one year. Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired facilities are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts. Accordingly, to date, no portion of the basis for an acquired property has been allocated to above- or below-market lease intangibles. To date, no intangible asset has been recorded for the value of customer relationships, because we do not have any concentrations of significant customers and the average customer turnover is fairly frequent.

We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment when events and circumstances, such as declines in occupancy and operating results, indicate that there may be an impairment. The carrying value of these long-lived assets is compared to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows, plus a terminal value, attributable to the assets to determine if the facility’s basis is recoverable. If an asset’s basis is not considered recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value. The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and to comply with the related provisions of the Code. Accordingly, we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent of our distributions to stockholders and as long as certain asset, income and share ownership tests are met. We had taxable income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and we had no taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2016. To qualify as a REIT, we must annually distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders and meet certain other requirements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, Significant Accounting Policies, for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following discussion of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto.

Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:



(Dollars in thousands)	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017		2016
Revenues:
Interest income from investments	$	27,576	$	11,457	$	6,532
Rental and other property-related income from real estate owned		3,499		530		-
Other revenues		139		204		-
Total revenues		31,214		12,191		6,532

Costs and expenses:
General and administrative expenses		7,270		5,852		5,574
Fees to Manager		7,442		3,453		1,688
Property operating expenses of real estate owned		1,712		271		-
Depreciation and amortization of real estate owned		3,425		472		-
Other expenses		290		-		2,129
Restructuring costs		-		-		54
Deferred termination fee to Manager		-		-		239
Total costs and expenses		20,139		10,048		9,684

Operating income (loss)		11,075		2,143		(3,152)

Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture		1,483		2,263		1,278
Realized gain on investments		619		-		-
Net unrealized gain on investments		42,945		10,804		18,370
Interest expense		(2,155)		(1,053)		(559)
Loss on modification of debt		-		(232)		-
Other interest income		399		634		80
Total other income		43,291		12,416		19,169
Net income		54,366		14,559		16,017
Net income attributable to preferred stockholders		(18,014)		(1,456)		(996)
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	36,352	$	13,103	$	15,021

Revenues

Total interest income from investments for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $27.6 million, an increase of $16.1 million, or 141%, over the year ended December 31, 2017. Total interest income from investments for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $11.5 million, an increase of $4.9 million, or 75%, over the year ended December 31, 2016. The interest rate on the majority of our investment portfolio and other loans remained at 6.9% per annum during 2018. The increase in interest income from investments is primarily attributed to the increase in the outstanding principal balances of our investment portfolio and other loans. Rental revenue from self-storage facilities owned was $3.5 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The increase in such revenues in 2018 and 2017 was attributable to our acquisition of developer interests in self-storage facilities we had previously financed. We did not own self-storage real estate properties during the year ended December 31, 2016. Other revenues of $0.1 million earned during the year ended December 31, 2018 is derived primarily from management fee revenue generated from the SL1 Venture. Other revenues of $0.2 million earned during the year ended December 31, 2017 was derived from borrower payment of internal costs in connection with closings during the first quarter of 2017 and management fee revenue generated from the SL1 Venture.

Table of Contents

Total general and administrative expenses

The following table provides a detail of total general and administrative expenses, excluding fees to Manager (dollars in thousands):



	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017		2016
Compensation and benefits	$	4,574	$	3,426	$	3,474
Occupancy		416		389		426
Business development		386		271		396
Professional fees		938		893		731
Other		956		873		547
General and administrative expenses (excluding fees to Manager)	$	7,270	$	5,852	$	5,574

Total general and administrative expenses (excluding fees to Manager) for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $7.3 million, an increase of $1.4 million, or 24%, from the year ended December 31, 2017. Of the $1.4 million increase, $1.1 million was attributable to an increase in compensation and benefits. Approximately half of such increase was represented by an increase in stock-based compensation, resulting from restricted stock grants in mid-2017 and the immediate vesting of a 15,000 share grant in 2018 to our CEO pursuant to the provisions of the agreement he signed with the Manager when he joined the Manager in June 2015. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, compensation and benefits also included $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of third party reimbursements to the Manager, which offset expenses reimbursed to the Manager by us on a dollar-for-dollar basis. The reduction in third-party reimbursements resulted in an increase in expense period-to-period. Finally, compensation and benefits also increased due to the addition of our President and CIO as a senior executive employee at the Manager in June 2018. Business development expenses increased $115,000, or 42%, primarily due to a developer conference we held in January 2018 and self-storage conferences attended in 2018.

Total general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $5.9 million, an increase of $0.3 million, or 5%, from the year ended December 31, 2016. Compensation and benefits included non-cash expense of stock-based compensation of $1.3 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. On May 3, 2017, certain of our officers and certain employees of the Manager were granted an aggregate of 105,000 restricted shares of common stock. Stock-based compensation expense is also affected by changes in the market price of our common stock. Offsetting the increase in compensation expense due to stock-based compensation was $0.4 million of third party reimbursements to the Manager which offset expenses reimbursed to the Manager by us on a dollar-for-dollar basis during the year ended December 31, 2017. No such reimbursements were received in the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in professional fees related primarily to an increase in business activity during the year ended December 31, 2017. Other expenses increased primarily due to additional franchise taxes accrued during 2017 as well as increased expenses related to directors and officers insurance and annual fees paid to certain of our independent directors. Excluding stock-based compensation expense, total general and administrative expenses increased 1% from 2016 to 2017.

Other operating expenses

We paid our Manager fees of $7.4 million and $3.5 million in the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, pursuant to the management agreement. The increase in fees to our Manager was primarily the result of the follow-on offerings of our common stock during the second quarters of 2018 and 2017, the issuance of common stock under our ATM Programs, and the issuances of our Series A and Series B preferred stock. We also incurred an incentive fee payable to the Manager of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily on account of the purchases of developer interests in six self-storage projects during the year. Property operating expenses of real estate owned and depreciation and amortization of real estate owned relate to the operating activities of our self-storage real estate owned.

The fees to Manager of $3.5 million and $1.7 million in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, relate to the management fee earned by the Manager pursuant to the Management Agreement. The increase in management fees was primarily a result of the completion of the follow-on offerings of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2016 and the second quarter of 2017, which increased stockholders' equity on which the base management fee is calculated. No incentive fee was paid to the Manager in 2017 or 2016. Property operating expenses of real estate owned and depreciation and amortization of real estate owned for the year ended December 31, 2017 relate to the operating activities of our self-storage real estate acquired during 2017. There were no restructuring costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2017. The deferred termination fee to our Manager of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 represented the accrual over the term of the Management Agreement of the deferred termination fee payable by our Operating Company in OC Units pursuant to the Management Agreement. On May 23, 2016, we amended the Management Agreement thus resulting in the cessation of this accrual.

Table of Contents

Other expenses

Other expenses consist of costs related to the termination of an employee contract during the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017. The $2.1 million of other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily consists of advisory fees and other expenses incurred in connection with our various financing transactions.

Other income (expense)

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we recorded other income of $43.3 million and $12.4 million, respectively, which primarily relates to the net unrealized gain on investments. During the period January 1 through August 31, 2016, we made no on-balance sheet development property investments, with all such investments being made through the SL1 Venture pursuant to the terms of our joint venture agreement executed in March 2016. From the second half of 2016 through the end of 2018, we invested solely on-balance sheet, closing 44 development property investments with a Profits Interest and five bridge investments with aggregate committed principal of $535.4 million and $83.3 million, respectively. Of these 44 development property investments with a Profits Interest, two opened for leasing in 2017, 16 opened for leasing in 2018, and many of the remaining investments were partially constructed during 2018. The construction progress and deliveries of these on-balance sheet investments contributed to significant fair value appreciation in 2018 in excess of that recognized in 2017.

On August 28, 2018, the underlying asset for the Tampa 1 investment was sold to a third party and proceeds were distributed to us as payment in full of the outstanding principal balance of our first mortgage loan and for our 49.9% Profits Interest. As a result of this transaction, in addition to funds received for the repayment of the loan, we received proceeds of $725,000 comprised of a $106,000 prepayment penalty, which is recognized in interest income from investments, and a $619,000 gain, which is recognized as realized gain on investments in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The $1.5 million and $2.3 million of equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture in the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, relates to our allocated earnings from the SL1 Venture. The SL1 Venture has elected the fair value option of accounting for its development property investments. The decrease in our equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture is attributed to higher fair value gains being recognized in 2017 by the SL1 Venture, resulting in higher income allocations to us during that year. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $2.2 million and relates primarily to amortization of deferred financing costs and interest incurred on our senior participation, Credit Facility, and term loans. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $1.1 million and related to interest incurred on our senior participations and Credit Facility, amortization of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the Credit Facility, and unused commitment fees related to the Credit Facility. Other interest income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 relates to interest earned on our cash deposits.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded other income of $12.4 million and $19.2 million, respectively, which primarily relates to the amount of net unrealized gain on investments recognized in each year. During 2016, we had eight investments open for leasing which resulted in a significant portion of the entrepreneurial profit adjustments on our on-balance sheet investments that were closed in 2015 being recognized in 2016. During 2017, we only had three on-balance sheet investments open for leasing as we made no on-balance sheet investments from January through August 31, 2016, resulting in decreased recognition of entrepreneurial profits adjustments from 2016 to 2017. The $2.3 million and $1.3 million of equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, relate to our allocated earnings from the SL1 Venture, which was entered into on March 31, 2016. Equity earnings from the SL1 Venture increased as it increased funding of construction draws as projects in the joint venture were built during 2017. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and relates to interest incurred on our senior A note participations, amortization of deferred financing costs that were incurred in connection with the closing of the Credit Facility, and unused commitment fees related to the Credit Facility. The $0.2 million loss on modification of debt was incurred in conjunction with the closing of the Credit Facility. Other interest income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and related to interest earned on our cash deposits.

Adjusted Earnings

Adjusted Earnings is a performance measure that is not specifically defined by GAAP and is defined as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus stock dividends to preferred stockholders, stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, loss on modification of debt, other expenses, restructuring costs, and deferred termination fee to Manager.

Table of Contents

Adjusted Earnings should not be considered as an alternative to net income or any other GAAP measurement of performance or as an alternative to cash flow from operating, investing, and financing activities as a measure of liquidity. We believe that Adjusted Earnings is helpful to investors as a starting point in measuring our operational performance, because it excludes various equity-based payments (including stock dividends) and other items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of our operating performance, which can make periodic and peer analyses of operating performance more difficult. Our computation of Adjusted Earnings may not be comparable to other key performance indicators reported by other REITs or real estate companies.

The following tables are reconciliations of Adjusted Earnings to net income attributable to common stockholders:



	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017		2016
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	36,352	$	13,103	$	15,021
Plus: stock dividends to preferred stockholders		8,500		547		823
Plus: stock-based compensation		1,828		1,295		1,080
Plus: depreciation and amortization on real estate assets		3,425		472		-
Plus: loss on modification of debt		-		232		-
Plus: other expenses		290		-		2,129
Plus: restructuring costs		-		-		54
Plus: deferred termination fee to Manager		-		-		239
Adjusted Earnings	$	50,395	$	15,649	$	19,346

Liquidity Outlook and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including commitments to fund construction mortgage loans included in our investment portfolio, repay borrowings, fund and maintain our assets and operations, make distributions to our stockholders and other general business needs. We use significant cash to originate our target investments, acquire the interests of developers in self-storage facilities we have financed, make distributions to our stockholders and fund our operations. In future periods we will likely require cash to pay the net purchase price for self-storage facilities with respect to which we exercise ROFRs. We have not yet generated sufficient cash flow from operations or investment activities to enable us to make any investments or cover our distributions to our stockholders. As a result, we are dependent on the issuance of equity securities, borrowings under our Credit Facility and other access to third-party sources of capital to continue our investing activities and pay distributions to our stockholders.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth changes in cash and cash equivalents:



	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017		2016
Net income	$	54,366	$	14,559	$	16,017
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:		(60,671)		(18,130)		(21,926)
Net cash used in operating activities		(6,305)		(3,571)		(5,909)
Net cash used in investing activities		(244,830)		(121,606)		(38,071)
Net cash provided by financing activities		212,873		104,781		67,494
Change in cash and cash equivalents	$	(38,262)	$	(20,396)	$	23,514

Cash decreased $38.3 million and $20.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and increased $23.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Net cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $6.3 million, $3.6 million, and $5.9 million, respectively. The primary components of cash used in operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2018 were net income adjusted for non-cash transactions of $8.2 million, offset by a change in cash from working capital of $1.0 million and $0.9 million of return on investment from the SL1 Venture. The primary components of cash used in operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2017 were net income adjusted for non-cash transactions of $5.3 million, offset by the change in cash from working capital of $1.0 million and $0.7 million of return on investment from the SL1 Venture. The primary components of cash used in operating

Table of Contents

activities during the year ended December 31, 2016 were net income adjusted for non-cash transactions of $6.7 million and the change in cash from working capital of $0.2 million, offset by $1.0 million of return on investment from the SL1 Venture.

Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $244.8 million, $121.6 million, and $38.1 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the cash used for investing activities consisted primarily of $258.6 million to fund investments, $4.6 million to fund other loans, $1.8 million to fund an advance on a future development property investment, $16.9 million to purchase additional interests in six of our development property investments and capital additions to those properties, $2.5 million to fund capital contributions to the SL1 Venture, offset, in part, by origination fees received in cash of $2.0 million, cash received of $0.6 million related to the settlement of profits interest as a result of the sale of the asset underlying our Tampa 1 development investment, a net inflow of $2.8 million for advancements made on behalf of the SL1 Venture, and $34.2 million from repayments of development property investments, operating property loans and other loan investments. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the cash used for investing activities consisted primarily of $152.7 million to fund investments, $10.5 million to fund other loans, $2.9 million to purchase additional interests in two of our development property investments, $6.0 million to fund capital contributions to the SL1 Venture, and a net use of $0.9 million for advancements made on behalf of the SL1 Venture, offset, in part, by origination fees received in cash of $4.6 million and $46.8 million from repayments of investment portfolio investments and other loan investments. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the cash used for investing activities consisted primarily of $45.5 million to fund investments, $16.0 million to fund other loans, $2.1 million to fund capital contributions to the SL1 Venture, and $2.3 million of net advances to the SL1 Venture, offset, in part, by $0.4 million of origination fees received in cash, a $7.3 million return of capital from the SL1 Venture and $20.4 million from repayments of two operating property loan investments, a construction loan, and other loan investments.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $212.9 million and primarily related to $122.3 million of net proceeds from preferred stock issuances, $101.6 million of net proceeds from common stock issuances, $24.6 million of net proceeds received from term loans, offset by a net outflow of $4.0 million related to draws and the subsequent repayment on the Credit Facility, $0.7 million repayment of our senior loan participation, $0.3 million of stock repurchases, and $30.6 million of dividends paid. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $104.8 million and primarily related to $111.8 million of net proceeds from the issuance of common stock, $30.0 million received for the issuances of Series A Preferred Stock, $1.8 million of cash received in connection with draws on senior loan participations on certain of our investments, and $0.3 million received upon closing of the Credit Facility, offset, in part, by a $20.0 million repayment of the Credit Facility, $1.9 million paid to repurchase certain senior loan participations, and $17.0 million of dividends paid. For the year ended December 31, 2016, cash provided by financing activities totaled $67.5 million and primarily related to the net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $53.5 million in December 2016, proceeds of $21.8 million from the sale of senior loan participations on certain of our investments, and net proceeds of $9.4 million from the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock, offset, in part, by $8.5 million of dividends paid, $3.2 million of stock repurchases, $2.4 million of deferred costs, and $3.2 million for the repurchase of a senior loan participation.

Liquidity Outlook and Capital Requirements

As of December 31, 2018, we had unrestricted cash of approximately $8.7 million, and we had remaining unfunded commitments of $220.9 million related to our investment portfolio and $0.9 million related to the SL1 Venture. During 2019, we also expect to acquire additional developer interests in self-storage facilities we have financed and to execute commitments to provide capital to additional self-storage development projects. We believe that the sources of capital discussed below will provide us with adequate liquidity to fund our operations and investment activities for at least the next 12 months.

Remaining unfunded commitments of $221.8 million related to our investment portfolio and SL1 Venture are estimated to be funded on the following schedule:



Future Fundings for Investments	2019		2020		2021		2022		2023 and thereafter		Total
Estimated Funding Amount	$	142,443	$	66,367	$	10,725	$	742	$	1,483	$	221,760

Credit Facility

On December 28, 2018, we entered into an amendment and restatement of the Credit Facility to, among other things allow up to $235 million of borrowings and an accordion feature permitting expansion up to $400 million. Our development property investments are eligible to be added to the base of collateral available to secure loans under the Credit Facility once they receive a certificate of occupancy, thereby

Table of Contents

increasing the borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility. Accordingly, we believe our availability under the Credit Facility will increase substantially over the next twelve months as construction on several investments in our investment portfolio are completed. However, we can provide no assurances that we will have access to the full amount of the Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2018, we had no borrowings under our Credit Facility. As of February 28, 2019, we had $21.0 million outstanding of our $118.0 million in total availability under the Credit Facility.

During 2019, we believe we will have substantial opportunities for new investments. Since our IPO, we have been able to issue publicly-traded common stock and preferred stock, access preferred equity in a private placement, sell senior participations in existing loans, procure the Credit Facility, and enter into term loan debt. Moreover, as self-storage facilities we have financed are completed, opened and leased up, developers will have the right and the opportunity to sell or refinance such facilities, providing us with an additional source of capital if refinancings occur or we choose to allow sales to occur without exercising our ROFRs with respect to sold facilities. Cash received from sales and refinancings can be recycled into new investments. Accordingly, we believe we will have adequate capital to finance new investments for at least the next 12 months.

Common Stock ATM Program

On April 5, 2017, we entered into the ATM Program with an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. On December 7, 2018, we entered into a new equity distribution agreement with an aggregate offering price under the new ATM Program of up to $75.0 million. Since the inception of the ATM Programs, we have sold an aggregate of 2,281,774 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $21.79 per share, receiving net proceeds after commissions and other offering costs of $48.3 million. As of February 28, 2019, we have approximately $75.3 million available for issuance under the ATM Programs.

Equity Capital Policies

Subject to applicable law and NYSE listing standards, our Board of Directors has the authority, without further stockholder approval, to issue additional authorized common stock and preferred stock or otherwise raise capital, including through the issuance of senior securities, in any manner and on the terms and for the consideration it deems appropriate, including in exchange for property. Stockholders will have no preemptive right to additional shares issued in any offering, and any offering may cause a dilution of your investment.

Additionally, the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock have the right to purchase their pro rata share of any qualified offering of common stock, which consists of any offering of common stock except any shares of common stock issued (i) in connection with a merger, consolidation, acquisition or similar business combination, (ii) in connection with a joint venture, strategic alliance or similar corporate partnering arrangement, (iii) in connection with any acquisition of assets by us, (iv) at market prices pursuant to a registered at-the-market program and/or (v) as part of a compensatory or employment arrangement.

Leverage Policies

To date, we have funded a substantial portion of our investments with the net proceeds from our IPO and concurrent private placement, which were consummated on April 1, 2015, proceeds from the issuance of our Series A Preferred Stock, proceeds from three follow-on public offerings of common stock, which were consummated on December 13, 2016, June 27, 2017, and June 14, 2018, proceeds received from sales of shares from time to time under the ATM Programs and proceeds from the issuance of our Series B Preferred Stock. At December 31, 2018, we had total indebtedness of $24.9 million, or 4.2% of total assets. During 2019, we expect to utilize borrowings under our Credit Facility along with the other sources of capital described herein to fund our investment commitments. Our investment guidelines state that our leverage will generally be 25% to 35% of our total assets. Additionally, as long as shares of Series A Preferred Stock remain outstanding, we are required to maintain a ratio of debt to total tangible assets determined under GAAP of no more than 0.4:1, measured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. Our Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants including: (i) total consolidated indebtedness not exceeding 50% of gross asset value; (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (defined as the ratio of consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to consolidated fixed charges) of 1.20 to 1.00 during the period between December 28, 2018 and December 31, 2020, 1.30 to 1.00 during the period between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 and 1.40 to 1.00 during the period between January 1, 2023 through the maturity of the Credit Facility; (iii) a minimum consolidated tangible net worth (defined as gross asset value less total consolidated indebtedness) of $373.6 million plus 75% of the sum of any additional net offering proceeds; (iv) when the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility exceeds $50 million, unhedged variable rate debt cannot exceed 40% of consolidated total indebtedness; (v) liquidity of no less than the greater of (a) future funding commitments of us and our subsidiaries for the three months following each date of determination and (b) $50 million for the period between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019 or on and after January 1, 2020, liquidity

Table of Contents

of no less than the greater of (a) future funding commitments of us and our subsidiaries for the six months following each date of determination and (b) $50 million; and (vi) a debt service coverage ratio (defined as the ratio of consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to our consolidated interest expense and debt principal payments for any given period) of 2.00 to 1.00.

The amount available to borrow under the Credit Facility is limited according to a borrowing base valuation of the assets available as collateral. For loans secured by our mortgage loans, the borrowing base availability is the lesser of (i) 60% of the outstanding balance of our mortgage loans and (ii) the maximum principal amount which would not cause the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility secured by our mortgage loans to be greater than 50% of the underlying real estate asset fair value securing our mortgage loans. For loans secured by non-stabilized self-storage properties, the borrowing base availability is the lesser of (i) the maximum principal amount that would not cause the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility secured by the non-stabilized self-storage properties to be greater than 60% of the as-stabilized value of such non-stabilized self-storage properties, (ii) the maximum principal amount which would not cause the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility to be greater than 75% of the total development cost of the non-stabilized self-storage properties, and (iii) whichever of the following is then applicable: (a) the maximum principal amount that would not cause the ratio of (1) stabilized net operating income from the non-stabilized self-storage properties included in the borrowing base divided by (2) an implied debt service coverage amount to be less than 1.35 to 1.00, (b) for any underlying real estate asset securing the non-stabilized self-storage properties that has been included in the borrowing base for greater than 18 months, the maximum principal amount which would not cause the ratio of (1) actual adjusted net operating income for the underlying real estate asset securing such non-stabilized self-storage properties divided by (2) an implied debt service amount to be less than 0.50 to 1.00, and (c) for any underlying real estate asset securing the non-stabilized self-storage properties that has been included in the borrowing base for greater than 30 months, the maximum principal amount which would not cause the ratio of (1) actual adjusted net operating income for the underlying real estate asset securing such non-stabilized self-storage properties divided by (2) an implied debt service amount to be less than 1.00 to 1.00. For loans secured by stabilized self-storage properties, the borrowing base availability is the lesser of (i) the maximum principal amount that would not cause the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility secured by the underlying real estate asset securing the stabilized self-storage properties to be greater than 65% of the value of such self-storage properties and (ii) the maximum principal amount that would not cause the ratio of (i) aggregate adjusted net operating income from the underlying real estate asset securing such stabilized self-storage properties included in the borrowing base divided by (ii) an implied debt service coverage amount to be less than 1.30 to 1.00.

Our actual leverage will depend on the composition of our investment portfolio. Our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount of indebtedness we can incur, and our Board of Directors has discretion to deviate from or change our investment guidelines at any time. We will use corporate leverage for the sole purpose of financing our portfolio and not for the purpose of speculating on changes in interest rates. Our financing strategy focuses on the use of match-funded financing structures. This means that we will seek to match the maturities and/or repricing schedules of our financial obligations with those of our investment portfolio to minimize the risk that we will have to refinance our liabilities prior to the maturities of our investments and to reduce the impact of changing interest rates on earnings, which our new Credit Facility will help us better achieve. We will disclose any material changes to our leverage policies in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of the quarterly report on Form 10‑Q or annual report on Form 10‑K for the period in which the change was made, or in a Current Report on Form 8‑K if required by the rules of the SEC or the Board of Directors deems it advisable, in its sole discretion.

Future Revisions in Policies and Strategies

The Board of Directors has the power to modify or waive our investment policies and strategies without the consent of our stockholders to the extent that the Board of Directors (including a majority of our independent directors) determines that a modification or waiver is in the best interest of our stockholders. Among other factors, developments in the market that either affect the policies and strategies mentioned herein or that change our assessment of the market may cause our Board of Directors to revise our policies and strategies.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table reflects our total contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):



Contractual Obligations	2019		2020		2021		2022		2023		Thereafter		Total
Long-term debt obligations (1)(2)(3)	$	-	$	-	$	24,900	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	24,900

⁽¹⁾

Represents principal gross of discounts and debt issuance costs.

⁽²⁾

Amount excludes interest, which is variable based on 30-day LIBOR plus a spread of 2.25%.

⁽³⁾

Does not reflect any borrowings under our Credit Facility as there were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2018. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of December 28, 2021, with two one-year extension options to extend the maturity date to December 28, 2023.

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2018, we had $220.9 million of unfunded loan commitments related to our investment portfolio and $0.9 million related to the SL1 Venture. These commitments are funded over the 12-30 months following the investment closing date as construction is completed. At December 31, 2018, we had $2.2 million of unfunded loan commitments related to our other assets.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 2018, we did not have any relationships, including those with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that are material to investors.

Our investment in real estate venture is recorded using the equity method as we do not have a controlling interest.

Dividends

For the quarter ended December 31, 2018, we declared a cash dividend to our stockholders of $0.35 per share, payable on January 15, 2019 to stockholders of record on January 2, 2019. We intend to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common stock. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income. We intend to pay regular quarterly dividends to our stockholders in an amount equal to or greater than our net taxable income, if and to the extent authorized by our Board of Directors. Before we pay any dividend, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, we must first meet both our operating requirements and debt service on any secured funding facilities, other lending facilities, repurchase agreements and other debt payable. If our cash available for distribution is less than our net taxable income, we could be required to reduce our dividends, sell assets or borrow funds to make cash distributions or we may make a portion of the required distribution in the form of a taxable stock distribution or distribution of debt securities.

Additionally, holders of our Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to a cumulative cash distribution (“Cash Distribution”) equal to (A) 7.0% per annum on the liquidation value, or $1,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Liquidation Value”) for the period beginning on the respective date of issuance until the sixth anniversary of the Effective Date, payable quarterly in arrears, (B) 8.5% per annum on the Liquidation Value for the period beginning the day after the sixth anniversary of the Effective Date and for each year thereafter so long as the Series A Preferred Stock remains issued and outstanding, payable quarterly in arrears, and (C) an amount in addition to the amounts in (A) and (B) equal to 5.0% per annum on the Liquidation Value upon the occurrence of certain triggering events (a “Cash Premium”). In addition, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to a cumulative dividend payable in-kind in shares of our common stock or additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock, at the election of the holders (the “Stock Dividend”), equal in the aggregate to the lesser of (Y) 25% of the incremental increase in our book value (as adjusted for equity capital issuances, share repurchases and certain non-cash expenses) plus, to the extent we own equity interests in income-producing real property, the incremental increase in net asset value (provided, however, that no interest in the same real estate asset will be double counted) and (Z) an amount that would, together with the Cash Distribution, result in a 14.0% internal rate of return for the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock from the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, as set forth in the Series A Articles Supplementary. For the first three fiscal quarters of the fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020 and for the first fiscal quarter of 2021, we will declare and pay a Series A Aggregate Stock Dividend equal to $2,125,000, or the Series A Target Stock Dividend. For the last fiscal quarter of each of 2018, 2019 and 2020 and for the second fiscal quarter of 2021, we will compute the cumulative Series A Aggregate Stock Dividend for all periods after December 31, 2018 through the end of such fiscal quarter equal to 25% of the incremental increase in our book value (as adjusted for equity capital issuances, share repurchases and certain non-cash expenses) plus, to the extent we own equity interests in income-producing real property, the incremental increase in net asset value (provided, however, that no interest in the same real estate asset will be double counted), or the Series A Computed Stock Dividend, and will declare and pay for such quarter a Series A Aggregate Stock Dividend equal to the greater of the Series A Target Stock Dividend or the Series A Computed Stock Dividend minus the sum of all Series A Aggregate Stock Dividends declared and paid for all fiscal quarters after December 31, 2018 and before the fiscal quarter for which such payment is computed, in each case subject to an amount that would, together with the Series A Cash Distribution, result in a 14.0% internal rate of return for the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock from the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock.

Triggering events that will trigger the payment of a Cash Premium with respect to a Cash Distribution include: (i) the occurrence of certain change of control events affecting us after the third anniversary of the Effective Date, (ii) our ceasing to be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, (iii) our failure to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust, (iv) an

Table of Contents

event of default under the Purchase Agreement, (v) the failure by us to register for resale shares of our common stock pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement (a “Registration Default”), (vi) our failure to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock as required by the Purchase Agreement, or (vii) the filing of a complaint, a settlement with, or a judgment entered by the SEC against us or any of our subsidiaries or any of our directors or executive officers relating to the violation of the securities laws, rules or regulations with respect to our business. Accrued but unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will accumulate and will earn additional Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends as calculated above, compounded quarterly.

Inflation

Virtually all of our assets and liabilities will be interest rate sensitive in nature. As a result, interest rates and other factors influence our performance far more so than does inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and our distributions will be determined by our Board of Directors consistent with our obligation to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income on an annual basis in order to maintain our REIT qualification; in each case, our activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost and/or fair market value without considering inflation.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We seek to manage our risks related to the credit quality of our assets, interest rates, liquidity, prepayment speeds and market value while, at the same time, seeking to provide an opportunity to stockholders to realize attractive risk-adjusted returns through ownership of our capital stock. While we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we believe the risk can be quantified from historical experience and seek to actively manage that risk, to earn sufficient compensation to justify taking those risks and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we undertake.

Credit Risk

We expect to be subject to varying degrees of credit risk in connection with holding a portfolio of our target investments. We will have exposure to credit risk on our loans. Our Manager will seek to manage credit risk by performing deep credit fundamental analysis of potential assets. Credit risk will also be addressed through our Manager’s on-going review, and investments will be monitored for variance from expected prepayments, defaults, severities, losses and cash flow on a monthly basis. Our investment guidelines do not limit the amount of our equity that may be invested in any type of our target investments. Our investment decisions will depend on prevailing market conditions and may change over time in response to opportunities available in different interest rate, economic and credit environments. As a result, we cannot predict the percentage of our equity that will be invested in any individual target investment at any given time.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including fiscal and monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political considerations, as well as other factors beyond our control. We will be subject to interest rate risk in connection with our assets and our related financing obligations. In general, we expect to finance the origination or acquisition of our target investments through financings in the form of borrowings under credit facilities (including term loans and revolving facilities in part). We may mitigate interest rate risk through utilization of hedging instruments, primarily interest rate swap agreements. Interest rate swap agreements are intended to serve as a hedge against future interest rate increases on our borrowings. We may also seek to limit the exposure of our borrowings to future fluctuations of interest rates

Table of Contents

through our use of interest-rate caps and other interest rate hedging instruments. As of December 31, 2018, we had no fixed-rate indebtedness and $24.9 million of floating rate indebtedness.

Interest Rate Mismatch Risk

We may fund a portion of our origination or acquisition of mortgage loans with borrowings that are based on LIBOR, while the interest rates on these loans may be indexed to non-LIBOR indices, such as U.S. Treasury Yields and other similar index rates. Accordingly, any increase in LIBOR relative to other index rates will generally result in an increase in our borrowing costs that may not be matched by a corresponding increase in the interest earnings on these loans. Any such interest rate index mismatch could adversely affect our profitability, which may negatively impact distributions to our stockholders. To mitigate interest rate mismatches, we may utilize the hedging strategies discussed above.

Our analysis of risks is based on our Manager’s experience, estimates, models and assumptions. These analyses rely on models which employ estimates of fair value and interest rate sensitivity. Actual economic conditions or implementation of decisions by our management may produce results that differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in our models and management’s projected results.

Market Risk

Our development property investments and bridge investments generally will be reflected at their estimated fair value, with changes in fair market value recorded in our income. The estimated fair value of these investments fluctuates primarily due to changes in interest rates, capitalization rates, and other factors. Generally, in a rising interest rate environment, the estimated fair value of the fixed-rate securities would be expected to decrease; conversely, in a decreasing interest rate environment, the estimated fair value of the fixed-rate securities would be expected to increase. As market volatility increases or liquidity decreases, the fair value of our investments may be adversely impacted. If we are unable to readily obtain independent pricing to validate our estimated fair value of any loan investment in our portfolio, the fair value gains or losses recorded in income may be adversely affected.

The following fluctuations in the market yields/discount rates would have had the following impact on the fair value of our investments:


	Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments
Change in market yields/discount rates (in millions)	December 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Up 25 basis points	$	(1.9)	$	(1.2)
Down 25 basis points, subject to a minimum yield/rate of 10 basis points		2.0		1.2

Up 50 basis points		(3.9)		(2.3)
Down 50 basis points, subject to a minimum yield/rate of 10 basis points		4.1		2.4

The following fluctuations in the capitalization rates would have had the following impact on the fair value of our investments:


	Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments
Change in capitalization rates (in millions)	December 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Up 25 basis points	$	(8.9)	$	(2.8)
Down 25 basis points		9.8		3.1

Up 50 basis points		(17.0)		(5.3)
Down 50 basis points		20.5		6.4

Real Estate Risk

Self-storage development property investments and bridge investments are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors); local real estate conditions; changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; and retroactive changes to building or similar codes. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay the underlying loans or loans, as the case may be, which could also cause us to suffer losses.

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	78

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017	79

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016	80

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016	81

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016	83

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	85

Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation	125

Schedule IV Mortgage Loans on Real Estate	126

All other schedules are omitted because they are not required or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Jernigan Capital, Inc.

Opinion on the financial statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jernigan Capital, Inc. (a Maryland corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and schedules included under Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 1, 2019

Table of Contents

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)



	December 31,
	2018		2017
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,715	$	46,977
Self-Storage Investment Portfolio:
Development property investments at fair value		373,564		228,233
Bridge investments at fair value		84,383		-
Operating property loans at fair value		-		5,938
Self-storage real estate owned, net		96,202		15,355
Investment in and advances to real estate venture		14,155		13,856
Other loans, at cost		4,835		1,313
Deferred financing costs		4,619		2,004
Prepaid expenses and other assets		3,702		776
Fixed assets, net		233		182
Total assets	$	590,408	$	314,634

Liabilities:
Senior loan participation	$	-	$	718
Secured revolving credit facility		-		-
Term loans, net of unamortized costs		24,609		-
Due to Manager		3,334		1,484
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,402		1,138
Dividends payable		12,199		5,474
Total liabilities		42,544		8,814

Equity:
7.00% Series A preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000 shares authorized; 125,000 and 40,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, at liquidation preference of $125.0 million and $40.0 million, net of offering costs, respectively		122,137		37,764
7.00% Series B cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 3,750,000 shares authorized; 1,571,734 and no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, at liquidation preference of $39.3 million and none, net of offering costs, respectively		37,401		-
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2018 and 2017; 20,430,218 and 14,429,055 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively		204		144
Additional paid-in capital		386,394		276,814
Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)		1,728		(8,902)
Total equity		547,864		305,820
Total liabilities and equity	$	590,408	$	314,634

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)



	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017		2016
Revenues:
Interest income from investments	$	27,576	$	11,457	$	6,532
Rental and other property-related income from real estate owned		3,499		530		-
Other revenues		139		204		-
Total revenues		31,214		12,191		6,532

Costs and expenses:
General and administrative expenses		7,270		5,852		5,574
Fees to Manager		7,442		3,453		1,688
Property operating expenses of real estate owned		1,712		271		-
Depreciation and amortization of real estate owned		3,425		472		-
Other expenses		290		-		2,129
Restructuring costs		-		-		54
Deferred termination fee to Manager		-		-		239
Total costs and expenses		20,139		10,048		9,684

Operating income (loss)		11,075		2,143		(3,152)

Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture		1,483		2,263		1,278
Realized gain on investments		619		-		-
Net unrealized gain on investments		42,945		10,804		18,370
Interest expense		(2,155)		(1,053)		(559)
Loss on modification of debt		-		(232)		-
Other interest income		399		634		80
Total other income		43,291		12,416		19,169
Net income		54,366		14,559		16,017
Net income attributable to preferred stockholders		(18,014)		(1,456)		(996)
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	36,352	$	13,103	$	15,021

Basic earnings per share attributable to common stockholders	$	2.10	$	1.10	$	2.42
Diluted earnings per share attributable to common stockholders	$	2.10	$	1.10	$	2.42

Dividends declared per share of common stock	$	1.40	$	1.40	$	1.40

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(in thousands, except share data)



	Series A Preferred Stock			Series B Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Additional		Retained Earnings		Total Stockholders'		Non-Controlling
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Paid-In-Capital		(Accumulated Deficit)		Equity		Interests		Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2015	-	$	-	-	$	-	6,162,500	$	62	$	110,634	$	(9,396)	$	101,300	$	464	$	101,764
Issuance of preferred stock	10,000		10,000	-		-	-		-		-		-		10,000		-		10,000
Equity offering costs related to issuance of preferred stock	-		(552)	-		-	-		-		-		-		(552)		-		(552)
Public offering of common stock	-		-	-		-	2,996,311		30		56,900		-		56,930		-		56,930
Equity offering costs related to issuance of common stock	-		-	-		-	-		-		(3,470)		-		(3,470)		-		(3,470)
Repurchase and retirement of shares of common stock	-		-	-		-	(213,078)		(2)		(3,150)		-		(3,152)		-		(3,152)
Repurchase and retirement of shares related to vested restricted stock	-		-	-		-	(2,052)		-		(33)		-		(33)		-		(33)
Issuances of stock-based awards	-		-	-		-	14,340		-		-		-		-		-		-
Stock-based compensation	-		-	-		-	-		-		1,080		-		1,080		-		1,080
Forfeiture and retirement of shares related to stock-based awards	-		-	-		-	(1,667)		-		-		-		-		-		-
Deferred termination fee to Manager	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		-		-		239		239
Effect of Management Agreement Amendment	-		-	-		-	-		-		703		-		703		(703)		-
Dividends declared on preferred stock	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		(996)		(996)		-		(996)
Dividends declared on common stock	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		(9,465)		(9,465)		-		(9,465)
Net income	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		16,017		16,017		-		16,017
Balance at December 31, 2016	10,000	$	9,448	-	$	-	8,956,354	$	90	$	162,664	$	(3,840)		168,362	$	-	$	168,362
Issuance of preferred stock	30,000		30,000	-		-	-		-		-		-		30,000		-		30,000
Equity offering costs related to issuance of preferred stock	-		(1,684)	-		-	-		-		-		-		(1,684)		-		(1,684)
Stock dividend paid on preferred stock	-		-	-		-	64,553		1		1,324		-		1,325		-		1,325
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs	-		-	-		-	4,025,000		40		83,887		-		83,927		-		83,927
At-the-market issuance of common stock, net of offering costs	-		-	-		-	1,279,706		12		27,831		-		27,843		-		27,843
Repurchase and retirement of shares of common stock	-		-	-		-	(7,972)		-		(177)		-		(177)		-		(177)
Issuances of stock-based awards	-		-	-		-	111,414		1		(10)		-		(9)		-		(9)
Stock-based compensation	-		-	-		-	-		-		1,295		-		1,295		-		1,295

Table of Contents

Dividends declared on preferred stock	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		(1,456)		(1,456)		-		(1,456)
Dividends declared on common stock	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		(18,165)		(18,165)		-		(18,165)
Net income	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		14,559		14,559		-		14,559
Balance at December 31, 2017	40,000	$	37,764	-	$	-	14,429,055	$	144	$	276,814	$	(8,902)	$	305,820	$	-	$	305,820
Issuance of preferred stock, net of offering costs	85,000		84,373	1,500,000		35,980	-		-		-		-		120,353		-		120,353
At-the-market issuance of preferred stock, net of offering costs	-		-	71,734		1,421	-		-		-		-		1,421		-		1,421
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs	-		-	-		-	4,600,000		46		81,097		-		81,143		-		81,143
At-the-market issuance of common stock, net of offering costs	-		-	-		-	1,002,068		10		20,472		-		20,482		-		20,482
Stock dividend paid on preferred stock	-		-	-		-	342,943		3		6,416		-		6,419		-		6,419
Repurchase and retirement of shares of common stock	-		-	-		-	(17,514)		-		(333)		-		(333)		-		(333)
Issuance of stock-based awards	-		-	-		-	75,333		1		(1)		-		-		-		-
Stock-based compensation	-		-	-		-	-		-		1,929		-		1,929		-		1,929
Forfeiture and retirement of shares related to stock-based awards	-		-	-		-	(1,667)		-		-		-		-		-		-
Dividends declared on Series A preferred stock	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		(15,389)		(15,389)		-		(15,389)
Dividends declared on Series B preferred stock	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		(2,625)		(2,625)		-		(2,625)
Dividends declared on common stock	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		(25,722)		(25,722)		-		(25,722)
Net income	-		-	-		-	-		-		-		54,366		54,366		-		54,366
Balance at December 31, 2018	125,000	$	122,137	1,571,734	$	37,401	20,430,218	$	204	$	386,394	$	1,728	$	547,864	$	-	$	547,864

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)



	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017		2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	54,366	$	14,559	$	16,017
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Interest capitalized on outstanding loans		(22,814)		(8,575)		(3,856)
Realized gain and net unrealized gain on investments		(43,564)		(10,804)		(18,370)
Stock-based compensation		1,929		1,295		1,080
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated self-storage real estate venture		(1,473)		(2,253)		(1,224)
Return on investment from unconsolidated self-storage real estate venture		857		700		995
Deferred termination fee to Manager		-		-		239
Depreciation and amortization		3,489		534		112
Amortization of deferred financing costs		877		373		16
Loss on modification of debt		-		232		-
Accretion of origination fees		(986)		(629)		(740)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(1,095)		26		(377)
Due to Manager		1,850		476		310
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities		259		495		(111)
Net cash used in operating activities		(6,305)		(3,571)		(5,909)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of corporate fixed assets		(115)		(46)		(50)
Purchase of self-storage real estate owned		(16,383)		(2,856)		-
Capital additions to self-storage real estate owned		(481)		-		-
Capital contributions to unconsolidated self-storage real estate venture		(2,487)		(6,013)		(2,137)
Return of capital from unconsolidated self-storage real estate venture		-		-		7,291
Advances to unconsolidated self-storage real estate venture		(16,242)		(50,396)		(18,293)
Repayment of advances to unconsolidated self-storage real estate venture		19,045		49,479		15,998
Proceeds received from settlement of profits interest		619		-		-
Capitalized unconsolidated real estate venture costs		-		-		(226)
Advances to future development property investments		(1,800)		-		-
Funding of investment portfolio:
Origination fees received in cash		1,999		4,566		441
Development property investments and bridge investments		(258,604)		(152,681)		(45,094)
Operating property loans		-		-		(429)
Funding of other loans		(4,602)		(10,504)		(15,978)
Repayments of investment portfolio investments		33,047		27,513		15,037
Repayments of other loans		1,174		19,332		5,369
Net cash used in investing activities		(244,830)		(121,606)		(38,071)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash received from Credit Facility, net of issuance costs		31,005		285		-
Cash received from term loans, net of issuance costs		24,567		-		-
Borrowings on senior loan participations		-		1,755		21,845
Repurchase of senior loan participations		(732)		(1,854)		(3,229)
Repayment of Credit Facility		(35,000)		(20,000)		-
Deferred financing costs		-		-		(2,357)
Stock repurchase		(333)		(177)		(3,185)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		101,625		111,761		53,460
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred stock		84,931		29,964		9,448
Net proceeds from issuance of Series B preferred stock		37,402		-		-
Dividends paid on Series A preferred stock		(5,032)		(704)		-
Dividends paid on Series B preferred stock		(1,937)		-		-
Dividends paid on common stock		(23,623)		(16,249)		(8,488)

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by financing activities		212,873		104,781		67,494
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(38,262)		(20,396)		23,514
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		46,977		67,373		43,859
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	8,715	$	46,977	$	67,373

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

1. ORGANIZATION AND FORMATION OF THE COMPANY

Jernigan Capital, Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company”) makes debt and equity investments in self-storage development projects and existing self-storage facilities, most of which were recently constructed, and also owns self-storage facilities. The Company is a Maryland corporation that was organized on October 1, 2014 and completed its initial public offering (the “IPO”) on April 1, 2015. The Company is structured as an Umbrella Partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) and conducts its investment activities through its operating company, Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC (the “Operating Company”). The Company is externally managed by JCAP Advisors, LLC (the “Manager”).

The Company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), as amended. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluded capital gains, to the extent that it annually distributes all of its REIT taxable income to stockholders and complies with various other requirements for qualification as a REIT set forth in the Code.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Substantially all operations are conducted through the Operating Company, and all significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

Variable Interest Entities

The Company invests in entities that may qualify as variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is a legal entity that lacks one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A VIE is defined as an entity in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE includes both a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Management bases the qualitative analysis on its review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure including allocation of decision-making authority and relevant financial agreements and the quantitative analysis on the forecasted cash flow of the entity. Management reassesses the initial evaluation of an entity as a VIE upon the occurrence of certain reconsideration events.

A VIE must be consolidated only by its primary beneficiary, which is defined as the party that, along with its affiliates and agents, has both the: (i) power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) obligation to absorb the losses of the VIE or the right to receive the benefits from the VIE, which could be significant to the VIE. Management determines whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE by considering qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and which party controls such activities; the amount and characteristics of its investment; the obligation or likelihood for the Company or other interests to provide financial support; and consideration of the VIE’s purpose and design, including the risks the VIE was designed to create and pass through to its variable interest holders and the similarity with and significance to the Company’s business activities and the other interests. Management reassesses the determination of whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE each reporting period.

Table of Contents

Equity Investments

Investments in real estate ventures and entities over which the Company exercises significant influence but not control are accounted for using the equity method. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825‑10”), issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for its development property investments and bridge investments, which would otherwise be required to be accounted for under the equity method. The Company also holds an investment in a self-storage real estate venture that is accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Investments and Election of Fair Value Option of Accounting for Certain Investments

The Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for all of its investment portfolio loan and equity investments, including those that are required under GAAP to be accounted for under the equity method, in order to provide stockholders and others who rely on the Company’s financial statements with a more complete and accurate understanding of the Company’s economic performance including its revenues and value inherent in the Company’s equity participation in development projects. Changes in the fair value of these investments are recorded in net unrealized gain on investments within other income. Interest income is reported in interest income from investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and is not included in the net unrealized gain on investments within other income. All direct loan costs are charged to expense as incurred.

Each loan investment, including those recorded at cost and presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as other loans, is evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis. For loans carried at fair value, indicators of impairment are reflected in the measurement of the loan. For loans that are carried at cost, the Company estimates an allowance for loan loss at each reporting date. In evaluating loan impairment, the Company also periodically evaluates the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower on a loan by loan basis. The Company also evaluates the financial wherewithal of any loan guarantors as well as the borrower’s competency in managing and operating the property. In addition, the Company considers the overall economic environment, real estate sector and geographic sub-market in which the borrower operates. A loan will be considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the loan will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors to be considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.

Realized Gains and Net Unrealized Gain on Investments

The Company measures realized gains by the difference between the net proceeds resulting from the sale of a self-storage property underlying one of the Company’s loan investments, excluding any prepayment penalties paid to the Company in connection with the repayment of the loan secured by the self-storage property, which are recognized in interest income from investments, and the cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized gain or loss previously recognized. Net unrealized gain on investments reflects the unrealized gains and losses recognized on certain investments during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains when gains are realized. All fluctuations in fair value are included in net unrealized gain on investments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to the year ended December 31, 2018, a sale of a self-storage property underlying one of the Company’s loan investment had not yet occurred and, thus, the Company had not yet realized any fair value gains on its investments. Accordingly, net increases in fair value of the Company’s investments had previously been reported in a single line item ‘Changes in fair value of investments’ in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Fair Value Measurement

The Company carries certain financial instruments at fair value because it has elected to apply the fair value option on an instrument by instrument basis under ASC 825‑10. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, development property investments and bridge investments (which are generally structured as first mortgages and a 49.9% Profits Interest in the project), operating property loans (loans secured by operating properties), the investment in self-storage real estate venture, other loans, receivables, the secured revolving Credit Facility (as defined below), the term loans, the senior loan participation, and payables.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2018:



	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Development property investments	$	373,564	$	-	$	-	$	373,564
Bridge investments (1)		84,383		-		-		84,383
Total investments	$	457,947	$	-	$	-	$	457,947

(1) The Company closed its first bridge investment on March 2, 2018.

The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2017:



	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Development property investments	$	228,233	$	-	$	-	$	228,233
Operating property loans		5,938		-		-		5,938
Total investments	$	234,171	$	-	$	-	$	234,171

Estimating fair value requires the use of judgment. The types of judgments involved depend upon the availability of observable market information. Management’s judgments include determining the appropriate valuation model to use, estimating unobservable inputs and applying valuation adjustments. See Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for additional disclosure on the valuation methodology and significant assumptions, as well as the election of the fair value option for certain financial instruments.

Self-Storage Real Estate Owned

Land is carried at historical cost. Building and improvements are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The cost consists primarily of: (i) the funded principal balance of the loan to the Company, net of unamortized origination fees; (ii) unrealized appreciation recognized as of the acquisition date; and (iii) the cash consideration paid and assumed liabilities, if applicable, to acquire the interests of other equity owners of the project. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The costs of building and improvements are generally depreciated using the straight-line method based on a useful life of 40 years.

The Company expects that the majority of future self-storage facility acquisitions will be considered asset acquisitions, however, the Company will evaluate each acquisition using Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01 - Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business to determine whether accounting for a business combination or asset acquisition applies.

In allocating the purchase price for an acquisition, the Company determines whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities. The Company allocates a portion of the cost to an intangible asset attributable to the value of in-place leases. This intangible asset is amortized to expense over the expected remaining term of the respective leases, which is generally one year. Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired facilities are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts. Accordingly, to date, no portion of the basis for an acquired property has been allocated to above- or below-market lease intangibles. To date, no intangible asset has been recorded for the value of customer relationships, because the Company does not have any concentrations of significant customers and the average customer turnover is fairly frequent.

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events and circumstances, such as declines in occupancy and operating results, indicate that there may be an impairment. The carrying value of these long-lived assets is compared to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows, plus a terminal value, attributable to the assets to determine if the facility’s basis is recoverable. If an asset’s basis is not considered recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value. The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset. There were no impairment losses recognized in accordance with these procedures during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Table of Contents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash, investments in money market accounts and certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents primarily with three financial institutions, and the balance at each financial institution exceeds the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit of $250,000 per institution.

Other Loans

The Company’s other loans balance primarily includes principal balances for certain revolving loan agreements and short-term mortgage loans made by the Company in situations where it was determined that making such loans would benefit the Company’s primary business. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had executed seven revolving loan agreements with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $0.7 million. Six of the agreements are with individuals who are owners of limited liability companies, one is with a limited liability company, and all are personally guaranteed. Six of these borrowers are either directly or indirectly owners of certain of the Company’s development property investments. The revolving loans are typically unsecured but cross-defaulted against development loans. One of the revolving loans is guaranteed by a part owner of one of the Company’s development loan investments, and this guaranty is secured by a pledge of the owner’s membership interest in one of the Company’s development loan investments. The loans bear interest at 6.9% or 7.0% per annum and are due in full in two or three years. At December 31, 2017, the Company had executed nine revolving loan agreements with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $1.0 million.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had a balance of $3.8 million related to one land loan extended to a limited liability company that is under common control with a borrower in certain of the Company’s development property investments. The land loan is secured by a first mortgage on real and personal property, is personally guaranteed, is interest-only with a fixed interest rate of 6.9% per annum, and had an original maturity date of January 20, 2019. The maturity of the loan was based upon the estimated time needed to approve the site for closing into a development loan.

These loans are accounted for under the cost method, and fair value approximates cost at December 31, 2018 and 2017. None of these loans are in non-accrual status as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. The Company determined that no allowance for loan loss was necessary at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are recorded at cost and consist of furniture, office and computer equipment, and software. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to seven years. Fixed assets are generally purchased by the Manager and the cost reimbursed by the Company. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon sale or retirement, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in income.

Revenue Recognition

Interest income is recognized as earned on a simple interest basis and is reported in interest income from investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Accrual of interest will be discontinued on a loan when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. The Company will recognize income on impaired loans when they are placed into non-accrual status on a cash basis when the loans are both current and the collateral on the loan is sufficient to cover the outstanding obligation to the Company. If these factors do not exist, the Company will not recognize income on such loans. Accrued interest generally is reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status.

The Company’s loan origination fees are accreted into interest income over the term of the investment using the effective yield method.

The operations of the self-storage real estate owned are managed by a third-party self-storage management company. All rental leases are operating leases, and rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the leases, which generally are month to month.

Table of Contents

Debt Issuance Costs

Costs related to the issuance of a debt instrument are deferred and amortized as interest expense over the estimated life of the related debt instrument using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. If a debt instrument is repurchased, modified, or exchanged prior to its original maturity date, the Company evaluates both the unamortized balance of debt issuance costs as well as any new debt issuance costs, including third party fees, to determine if the costs should be written off to interest expense or, if significant, included in “loss on modification or extinguishment of debt” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Debt issuance costs related to the sale of senior participations or term loans are presented in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as a deduction from the carrying amount of the principal balance. Debt issuance costs related to the revolving Credit Facility are presented in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as Deferred Financing Costs.

Other expenses

Other expenses of $0.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 consist of costs related to the termination of an employee contract and have been expensed as incurred. Other expenses of $2.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 consist of non-capitalizable advisory fees and other unreimbursed expenses incurred in connection with various financing and investment transactions and were expensed as incurred. The Company incurred no other expense during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Offering and Registration Costs

Offering and registration costs represent underwriting discounts and commissions, professional fees, fees paid to various regulatory agencies, and other costs incurred in connection with the registration and sale of the Company’s securities. Offering and registration costs incurred in connection with the Company’s common stock offerings are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

On July 27, 2016, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 8, Stockholders’ Equity) which required the Company to issue and sell a minimum of $50.0 million of Series A Preferred Stock by July 27, 2018. On July 25, 2018, the Purchase Agreement was amended to allow the Company to issue the remaining portion of the Series A Preferred Stock on or before September 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has issued and sold $125.0 million in shares of Series A Preferred Stock, and, as a result, may not issue any additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement other than in connection with the payment of in-kind dividends. The Company incurred $2.8 million of preferred stock offering costs in conjunction with the execution of the Purchase Agreement. Such costs were presented as deferred costs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets until such time as Series A Preferred Stock was issued. A pro rata portion of such deferred costs, based upon the ratio of the amount issued to the $50.0 million minimum issuance of Series A Preferred Stock, was reclassified to cumulative preferred stock upon each issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock. Of the $2.8 million of offering costs incurred, none and $0.6 million is in deferred costs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $2.8 million and $2.2 million has reduced the cumulative preferred stock balance on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT and to comply with the related provisions of the Code. Accordingly, the Company will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent of its distributions to stockholders and as long as certain asset, income and share ownership tests are met. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and meet certain other requirements.

Earnings per Share (“EPS”)

Basic EPS includes only the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS includes the weighted average number of common shares and the dilutive effect of restricted stock, accrued stock dividends, and redeemable Operating Company units when such instruments are dilutive.

All outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends are treated as participating in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. Awards of this nature are considered participating securities and the two-class method of computing basic and diluted EPS must be applied.

Table of Contents

Comprehensive Income

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, comprehensive income equaled net income; therefore, separate Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Segment Reporting

The Company does not evaluate performance on a relationship specific or transactional basis and does not distinguish its principal business or group its operations on a geographical basis for purposes of measuring performance. Accordingly, the Company believes it has a single operating segment for reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This update creates a single accounting model for all share-based payments. As a result of this update, the existing employee guidance will apply to nonemployee share-based transactions, with the cost of nonemployee awards continuing to be recorded as if the grantor had paid cash for the goods or services. The equity-classified share-based payment awards issued to nonemployees will now be measured on the grant date, instead of the previous requirement to re-measure the awards through the performance completion date. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. As allowed, the Company has elected to early adopt the amendments in ASU 2018-07 effective April 1, 2018. As required by the ASU, the Company has established a grant date fair value of $18.10 based on the market value of the award as of April 1, 2018 for all nonemployee awards that have not vested as of April 1, 2018. The cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018 was immaterial to the financial statements as a whole. As such, the Company recorded this adjustment through its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017‑01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which provides guidance on whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. Specifically, when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set of assets is not a business. Additionally, ASU 2017‑01 also provides other guidance providing a more robust framework to use in determining whether a set of assets and activities is a business. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017‑01 for new acquisitions beginning on July 1, 2017. Since adoption of the new guidance, the Company has considered its self-storage facility acquisitions to be asset acquisitions. The costs related to the acquisitions of self-storage facilities that qualify as asset acquisitions are capitalized as part of the purchase.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU provides guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows (defined in the ASU as “cash flow issues”), including distributions received from equity method investees. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption being allowed. The Company has elected to early adopt effective October 1, 2017 on a retrospective basis as required. The Company has concluded that the new accounting guidance does not impact its current classification of distributions received from equity method investees as an operating activity in its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company further considered its components of cash flows under the cash flow issue “Separately Identifiable Cash Flow and Applicable of the Predominance Principle,” which addresses certain cash receipts and cash payments that may have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. In the absence of specific GAAP guidance, the Company evaluated its cash flows from origination fees received in cash, which have been historically presented as operating cash flows, on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. The Company concluded that the origination fees are related to the origination of loans and the funding of our investment portfolio for which the associated cash flows are presented as investing activities. As a result, $0.4 million of origination fees received in cash for the year ended December 31, 2016, have been retrospectively presented as an investment activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016‑13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption being allowed as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the impact this new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial

Table of Contents

statements; however, the Company does not expect the new accounting guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016‑02, Leases (Topic 842), which is the final standard on accounting for leases. The most significant change for lessees is the requirement under the new guidance to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all leases not considered short term leases. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. The Company does have rental income from month-to-month self-storage leases within the scope of ASU 2016‑02. The Company does not have material amounts of rental or lease expense. The amendments in ASU 2016‑02 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has assessed the impact this new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and does not expect the new accounting guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2017. This ASU outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry specific guidance. Several ASUs expanding and clarifying the initial guidance issued in ASU 2014-09 have been released since May 2014. The Company adopted the ASU effective January 1, 2018. The Company has evaluated all applicable contracts and revenue streams and has concluded that the adoption does not have an effect on its consolidated financial statements, primarily due to the new guidance not applying to revenue associated with loans or derived from lease contracts.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Supplemental Disclosures

The following table provides supplemental disclosures related to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:



	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017		2016
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	1,448	$	926	$	484
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Stock dividend paid on preferred stock	$	6,419	$	1,325	$	-
Dividends declared, but not paid, on preferred stock		5,049		423		996
Dividends declared, but not paid, on common stock		7,150		5,051		3,134
Contribution of assets to real estate venture		-		-		7,693
Reclassification of self-storage real estate owned		66,390		12,919		-
Assumed liabilities with acquisition of self-storage real estate owned		252		-		-
Consideration payable due to acquisition of self-storage real estate owned		100		-		-
Construction and other costs incurred, but not paid, on self-storage real estate owned		270		-		-
Other loans paid off with issuance of development property investments		117		1,727		-
Other deferred fees paid-in-kind		500		-		-
Reclassification of deferred costs to cumulative preferred stock		559		1,648		-

3. SELF-STORAGE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

The Company’s self-storage investments at December 31, 2018 consisted of the following:

Investments reported at fair value

Development Property Investments - The Company had 46 investments totaling an aggregate committed principal amount of approximately $533.3 million to finance the ground-up construction of, or conversion of existing buildings into, self-storage facilities. Each development property investment is generally funded as the developer constructs the project and is typically comprised of a first mortgage and a 49.9% Profits Interest to the Company. The loans are secured by first priority mortgages or deeds of trust on the projects and, in certain cases, first priority security interests in the membership interests of the owners of the projects. Loans comprising development property investments are non-recourse with customary carve-outs and subject to completion guaranties, are interest-only with a fixed interest rate of typically 6.9% per annum and typically have a term of 72 months. As of December 31, 2018,

Table of Contents

one of the development property investments totaling $9.3 million of aggregate committed amount was structured as a preferred equity investment, which will be subordinate to a first mortgage loan expected to be procured from a third party lender for 60% to 70% of the cost of the project.

Included in development property investments as of December 31, 2018 was one construction loan with a committed principal amount of approximately $17.7 million that is interest-only at a fixed interest rate of 6.9% annum (default rate of 12.9% annum), has no equity participation and is secured by a first priority mortgage on the project. This construction loan had an initial term of 18 months that was extended during the first quarter of 2017 and in 2018. This loan matured and became due and payable on June 30, 2018; however, it has yet to be repaid. Accordingly, this construction loan is in default and was placed on non-accrual status during the three months ended December 31, 2018. Since that time, no interest income has been recognized and will only be recognized if interest is collected in cash. The total unpaid balance of the loan is $17.7 million. As the investment is a collateral dependent loan, the Company considered the fair value of the collateral when determining the fair value of the investment as of December 31, 2018. The fair value of the investment as of December 31, 2018 is $17.7 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, the Company commenced proceedings to foreclose on the underlying collateral.

Bridge Investments – The Company had five bridge investments with an aggregate committed principal amount of approximately $83.3 million. Three of these bridge investments amounting to an aggregate committed principal amount of $47.1 million are secured by first priority mortgages on self-storage properties with an aggregate of over 203,000 net rentable square feet that were completed and began lease-up in 2016, which loans bear interest at an annual rate of 6.9%, payable monthly. The Company has a 49.9% Profits Interest in these three properties. Two of these bridge investments aggregating a committed principal amount of $36.2 million are secured by first priority mortgages on two newly-completed self-storage properties with an aggregate of over 163,000 net rentable square feet, which loans bear interest at an annual rate of 9.5%, with 6.5% payable monthly and 3.0% payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest accruing and payable upon maturity of the loan. The Company also has a 49.9% Profits Interest, after the other members of the borrower receive $1.0 million of preferential payments per loan. All five loans will mature five years from the date of closing, with the borrower having two extension options for one year each. The bridge investments are all issued and outstanding with a single borrower.

As of December 31, 2018, the aggregate committed principal amount of the Company’s development property investments and bridge investments was approximately $634.3 million and outstanding principal was $413.5 million, as described in more detail in the table below:



	Metropolitan					Remaining
	Statistical Area	Total Investment		Funded		Unfunded
Closing Date	("MSA")	Commitment		Investment (1)		Commitment		Fair Value
Development property investments (includes a profits interest):
7/2/2015	Milwaukee (2)(8)	$	7,650	$	7,648	$	2	$	9,057
7/31/2015	New Haven (2)(8)		6,930		6,827		103		8,350
8/14/2015	Raleigh (2)(8)		8,792		8,498		294		8,002
10/27/2015	Austin (2)(8)		8,658		7,817		841		7,763
9/20/2016	Charlotte 2 (2)(8)		12,888		11,445		1,443		12,793
11/17/2016	Jacksonville 2 (2)(8)		7,530		7,157		373		9,122
1/18/2017	Atlanta 3 (3)		14,115		8,711		5,404		9,337
1/31/2017	Atlanta 4 (2)		13,678		12,957		721		16,031
2/24/2017	Orlando 3 (2)		8,056		7,229		827		8,592
2/24/2017	New Orleans (2)		12,549		10,587		1,962		12,221
2/27/2017	Atlanta 5 (3)		17,492		14,095		3,397		15,371
3/1/2017	Fort Lauderdale (2)		9,952		7,604		2,348		10,475
3/1/2017	Houston (3)(7)		14,825		10,936		3,889		13,285
4/14/2017	Louisville 1 (2)(8)		8,523		6,979		1,544		8,540
4/20/2017	Denver 1 (3)		9,806		6,884		2,922		7,706
4/20/2017	Denver 2 (2)		11,164		10,235		929		12,403
5/2/2017	Atlanta 6 (2)		12,543		10,589		1,954		12,774
5/2/2017	Tampa 2 (3)		8,091		5,493		2,598		6,020
5/19/2017	Tampa 3 (2)		9,224		7,154		2,070		8,391
6/12/2017	Tampa 4 (2)		10,266		8,846		1,420		11,419

Table of Contents

6/19/2017	Baltimore 1 (2)(4)		10,775		9,177		1,598		10,805
6/28/2017	Knoxville (2)(8)		9,115		7,717		1,398		8,652
6/29/2017	Boston 1 (2)(6)		-		-		-		2,614
6/30/2017	New York City 2 (2)(4)		26,482		24,760		1,722		28,102
7/27/2017	Jacksonville 3 (2)		8,096		6,836		1,260		8,251
8/30/2017	Orlando 4 (2)		9,037		6,769		2,268		8,264
9/14/2017	Los Angeles 1		28,750		8,692		20,058		8,418
9/14/2017	Miami 1		14,657		6,882		7,775		6,562
9/28/2017	Louisville 2 (2)(8)		9,940		8,691		1,249		10,652
10/12/2017	Miami 2 (4)		9,459		1,335		8,124		1,082
10/30/2017	New York City 3 (4)		14,701		4,835		9,866		4,383
11/16/2017	Miami 3 (4)		20,168		4,096		16,072		3,542
11/21/2017	Minneapolis 1		12,674		3,214		9,460		3,070
12/1/2017	Boston 2 (3)		8,771		3,978		4,793		4,246
12/15/2017	New York City 4		10,591		1,777		8,814		1,631
12/27/2017	Boston 3		10,174		2,563		7,611		2,402
12/28/2017	New York City 5		16,073		6,523		9,550		6,400
2/8/2018	Minneapolis 2 (3)		10,543		7,802		2,741		8,773
3/30/2018	Philadelphia (3)(4)		14,338		7,870		6,468		8,093
4/6/2018	Minneapolis 3		12,883		2,333		10,550		2,206
5/1/2018	Miami 9 (4)		12,421		2,803		9,618		2,564
5/15/2018	Atlanta 7		9,418		861		8,557		775
5/23/2018	Kansas City		9,968		1,228		8,740		1,137
6/7/2018	Orlando 5		12,969		800		12,169		673
6/12/2018	Los Angeles 2 (5)		9,298		4,597		4,701		4,581
11/16/2018	Baltimore 2		9,247		390		8,857		301
		$	533,280	$	314,220	$	219,060	$	355,831
Construction loans:
12/23/2015	Miami		17,733		17,733		-		17,733
		$	17,733	$	17,733	$	-	$	17,733
Total development property investments		$	551,013	$	331,953	$	219,060	$	373,564

Bridge investments (includes a profits interest):
3/2/2018	Miami 4 (2)(8)		20,201		20,201		-		22,823
3/2/2018	Miami 5 (2)(4)(8)		17,738		16,883		855		14,432
3/2/2018	Miami 6 (2)(8)		13,370		13,370		-		17,372
3/2/2018	Miami 7 (2)(4)(8)		18,462		17,581		881		15,971
3/2/2018	Miami 8 (2)(8)		13,553		13,472		81		13,785
Total bridge investments		$	83,324	$	81,507	$	1,817	$	84,383

Total investments reported at fair value		$	634,337	$	413,460	$	220,877	$	457,947

⁽¹⁾

Represents principal balance of loan gross of origination fees. The principal balance includes interest and fees accrued on the investment.

⁽²⁾

Construction at the facility was substantially complete and/or certificate of occupancy had been received as of December 31, 2018. See Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for information regarding recognition of entrepreneurial profit.

⁽³⁾

Facility had achieved at least 40% construction completion but construction was not considered substantially complete as of December 31, 2018. See Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for information regarding recognition of entrepreneurial profit.

⁽⁴⁾

These investments contain a higher loan-to-cost (“LTC”) ratio and a higher interest rate, some of which interest is PIK interest. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each debt agreement, is periodically added to the principal balance of the debt and is recorded as interest income. Thus, the actual collection of this interest may be deferred until the time of debt principal repayment.

⁽⁵⁾

This investment has a total project cost of $29.5 million of which a traditional bank is expected to provide 60-70% of the total cost through a first mortgage construction loan. Of the remaining 30-40% of costs required to complete the project, the Company will provide 90% through a preferred equity investment, pursuant to which the Company will receive a preferred return on its investment of 6.9% per annum that will be paid out of future cash flows of the underlying facility, a 1% transaction fee and a 49.9% Profits Interest.

Table of Contents

⁽⁶⁾

The Company’s loan was repaid in full through a refinancing initiated by the Company’s partner. The investment represents the Company’s 49.9% Profits Interest which was retained during the transaction.

⁽⁷⁾

On December 31, 2018, the Company increased the total commitment amount of this loan in exchange for a fee that was immediately advanced on the loan. The fee will be recognized into income in the future as earned and will be received in cash upon the repayment of the loan.

⁽⁸⁾

As of December 31, 2018, this investment was pledged as collateral to the Company’s Credit Facility.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the funded principal to the fair market value of investments at December 31, 2018:



Funded principal	$	413,460
Adjustments:
Unamortized origination and other fees		(6,382)
Net unrealized gain on investments		50,953
Other		(84)
Fair value of investments	$	457,947

As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate committed principal amount of the Company’s development property investments and operating property loans was approximately $523.8 million and outstanding principal was $213.1 million, as described in more detail in the table below:



	Metropolitan					Remaining
	Statistical Area	Total Investment		Funded		Unfunded
Closing Date	("MSA")	Commitment		Investment (1)		Commitment		Fair Value
Development property investments (includes a profits interest):
6/10/2015	Atlanta 1 (2)(5)(8)	$	8,132	$	8,086	$	46	$	10,741
6/19/2015	Tampa 1 (2)(6)(8)		5,369		5,285		84		6,012
6/26/2015	Atlanta 2 (2)(5)(8)		6,050		5,769		281		8,631
6/29/2015	Charlotte 1 (2)(5)(8)		7,624		7,251		373		10,363
7/2/2015	Milwaukee (2)(8)		7,650		7,512		138		8,994
7/31/2015	New Haven (2)(8)		6,930		6,524		406		8,231
8/10/2015	Pittsburgh (2)(5)		5,266		4,798		468		6,774
8/14/2015	Raleigh (3)		8,792		5,550		3,242		5,889
9/30/2015	Jacksonville 1 (2)(5)(8)		6,445		5,988		457		8,913
10/27/2015	Austin (2)(8)		8,658		7,297		1,361		8,782
9/20/2016	Charlotte 2 (3)		12,888		5,453		7,435		5,686
11/17/2016	Jacksonville 2 (3)		7,530		4,971		2,559		5,818
1/4/2017	New York City 1 (2)(5)		16,117		14,914		1,203		18,892
1/18/2017	Atlanta 3		14,115		2,393		11,722		2,236
1/31/2017	Atlanta 4 (3)		13,678		7,040		6,638		7,147
2/24/2017	Orlando 3 (3)		8,056		3,144		4,912		3,335
2/24/2017	New Orleans		12,549		677		11,872		553
2/27/2017	Atlanta 5		17,492		4,971		12,521		4,739
3/1/2017	Fort Lauderdale		9,952		1,128		8,824		1,043
3/1/2017	Houston		13,630		3,633		9,997		3,547
4/14/2017	Louisville 1 (3)		8,523		2,932		5,591		3,083
4/20/2017	Denver 1		9,806		1,940		7,866		1,849
4/20/2017	Denver 2 (3)		11,164		5,442		5,722		5,849
5/2/2017	Atlanta 6		12,543		4,344		8,199		4,262
5/2/2017	Tampa 2		8,091		1,086		7,005		1,010
5/19/2017	Tampa 3		9,224		1,422		7,802		1,335
6/12/2017	Tampa 4		10,266		1,847		8,419		1,752
6/19/2017	Baltimore (4)		10,775		3,315		7,460		3,115
6/28/2017	Knoxville		9,115		1,351		7,764		1,265
6/29/2017	Boston 1 (3)		14,103		4,978		9,125		4,914
6/30/2017	New York City 2 (4)		26,482		18,042		8,440		17,576

Table of Contents

7/27/2017	Jacksonville 3		8,096		1,134		6,962		1,053
8/30/2017	Orlando 4		9,037		2,059		6,978		1,960
9/14/2017	Los Angeles		28,750		7,533		21,217		7,398
9/14/2017	Miami 1		14,657		5,862		8,795		5,725
9/28/2017	Louisville 2		9,940		1,864		8,076		1,762
10/12/2017	Miami 2 (4)		9,459		1,014		8,445		820
10/30/2017	New York City 3 (4)		14,701		2,595		12,106		2,294
11/16/2017	Miami 3 (4)		20,168		3,508		16,660		3,099
11/21/2017	Minneapolis 1		12,674		1,150		11,524		1,023
12/1/2017	Boston 2		8,771		1,306		7,465		1,220
12/15/2017	New York City 4		10,591		927		9,664		823
12/27/2017	Boston 3		10,174		2,259		7,915		2,169
12/28/2017	New York City 5		16,073		4,303		11,770		4,178
		$	500,106	$	194,597	$	305,509	$	215,860

Construction loans:
12/23/2015	Miami (8)		17,733		12,492		5,241		12,373
		$	17,733	$	12,492	$	5,241	$	12,373
Total development property investments		$	517,839	$	207,089	$	310,750	$	228,233

Operating property loans:
7/7/2015	Newark (7)(8)		3,480		3,480		-		3,447
12/22/2015	Chicago (7)(8)		2,502		2,500		2		2,491
Total operating property loans		$	5,982	$	5,980	$	2	$	5,938

Total investments reported at fair value		$	523,821	$	213,069	$	310,752	$	234,171

⁽¹⁾

Represents principal balance of loan gross of origination fees.

⁽²⁾

Construction at the facility was substantially complete and/or certificate of occupancy had been received as of December 31, 2017. See Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for information regarding recognition of entrepreneurial profit.

⁽³⁾

Facility had achieved at least 40% construction completion but construction was not considered substantially complete as of December 31, 2017. See Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for information regarding recognition of entrepreneurial profit.

⁽⁴⁾

These investments contain a higher LTC ratio and a higher interest rate, some of which interest is payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each debt agreement, is periodically added to the principal balance of the debt and is recorded as interest income. Thus, the actual collection of this interest may be deferred until the time of debt principal repayment.

⁽⁵⁾

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company purchased its partner’s 50.1% Profits Interest in these investments.

⁽⁶⁾

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the underlying facility of this development property investment was sold to a third party. See further discussion of this transaction in Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments.

⁽⁷⁾

This investment was fully repaid during the year ended December 31, 2018.

⁽⁸⁾

As of December 31, 2017, this investment was pledged as collateral to the Company’s Credit Facility or senior loan participation.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the funded principal to the fair market value of investments at December 31, 2017:



Funded principal	$	213,069
Adjustments:
Unamortized origination fees		(5,081)
Net unrealized gain on investments		26,267
Other		(84)
Fair value of investments	$	234,171

The Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for all of its investment portfolio investments in order to provide stockholders and others who rely on the Company’s financial statements with a more complete and accurate understanding of the Company’s economic performance, including its revenues and value inherent in its equity participation in development projects. See Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for additional disclosure on the valuation methodology and significant assumptions.

Table of Contents

No loans, with the exception of the $17.7 million Miami construction loan, were in non-accrual status as of December 31, 2018, and no loans were in non-accrual status as of December 31, 2017.

All of the Company’s development property investments and bridge investments with a Profits Interest would have been accounted for under the equity method had the Company not elected the fair value option. For these development property investments and bridge investments with a Profits Interest, the assets and liabilities of the equity method investees approximated $442.6 million and $395.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018. These investees had revenues of approximately $4.9 million and operating expenses of $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, no individual investment comprised more than 20% of the Company’s net income.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the total income (interest income and net unrealized gain on investment) from one development property investment with a Profits Interest exceeded 20% of the Company’s net income. The Company recorded total income for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $4.9 million from the New York City 1 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest.

The assets and liabilities of the New York City 1 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest were $15.8 million and $14.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017. The revenues and operating expenses of the New York City 1 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest were $16,000 and $0.2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017. The New York City 1 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest had not been closed as of December 31, 2016.

The assets and liabilities of the equity method investees excluding the New York City 1 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest approximated $218.9 million and $179.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017. The revenues and operating expenses of the equity method investees excluding the New York City 1 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest were $3.0 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the total income (interest income and net unrealized gain on investment) from one development property investment with a Profits Interest exceeded 20% of the Company’s net income. The Company recorded total income for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $3.6 million from the Atlanta 2 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest.

The revenues and operating expenses of the Atlanta 2 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest were $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016. The revenues and operating expenses of the equity method investees excluding the Atlanta 2 MSA development property investment with a Profits Interest were $0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016.

For sixteen and thirteen of the Company’s development property investments with a Profits Interest as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, an investor has an option to put its interest to the Company upon the event of default of the underlying property loans. The put, if exercised, requires the Company to purchase the member’s interest at the original purchase price plus a yield of 4.5% on such purchase price. The Company concluded that the likelihood of loss is remote and assigned no value to these put provisions as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Investments reported at cost (Self-Storage Real Estate Owned)

2018 Activity

On January 10, 2018, the Company purchased 100% of the Class A membership units of the limited liability company that owned the Jacksonville 1 development property investment with a Profits Interest for $2.7 million. Accordingly, as of January 10, 2018, the Company wholly owns and consolidates this investment in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On February 2, 2018, the Company purchased 100% of the Class A membership units of the limited liability companies that owned the Atlanta 1 and Atlanta 2 development property investments with a Profits Interest for $2.4 million and $3.0 million, respectively. Accordingly, as of February 2, 2018, the Company wholly owns and consolidates these investments in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On February 20, 2018, the Company purchased 100% of the Class A membership units of the limited liability company that owned the Pittsburgh development property investment with a Profits Interest for $1.7 million and assumed liabilities of $0.3 million. Accordingly, as of February 20, 2018, the Company wholly owns and consolidates this investment in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

On August 31, 2018, the Company purchased 100% of the Class A membership units of the limited liability company that owned the Charlotte 1 development property investment with a Profits Interest for $3.1 million. Accordingly, as of August 31, 2018, the Company wholly owns and consolidates this investment in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On December 21, 2018, the Company purchased 100% of the Class A membership units of the limited liability company that owned the New York City 1 development property investment with a Profits Interest for $3.8 million. Accordingly, as of December 21, 2018, the Company wholly owns and consolidates this investment in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

2017 Activity

On February 3, 2017, the Company purchased 50% of the economic rights of the Class A membership units of a limited liability company that owned the Orlando 1 development property investment with a Profits Interest for $1.3 million and increased its Profits Interest on this development property investment from 49.9% to 74.9%. The Class A member retained all management and voting rights in the limited liability company. Previously, the Company accounted for this investment as an equity method investment. Because the Company was entitled to greater than 50% of the residual profits from the investment, the Company accounted for this investment as a real estate investment in its consolidated financial statements in accordance with ASC 310, Receivables.

On August 9, 2017, the Company purchased the remaining 50% of the economic rights of the Class A membership units of a limited liability company that owned the Orlando 1 development property investment with a Profits Interest and 100% of the economic rights of the Class A membership units of a limited liability company that owned the Orlando 2 development property investment with a Profits Interest for $1.6 million and increased its Profits Interest on these development property investment from 74.9% to 100% and 49.9% to 100%, respectively. The Orlando 2 investment is an additional phase to the Orlando 1 investment that is being operated as one self-storage facility. The Company now owns all management and voting rights in the limited liability companies. Previously, the Company accounted for the Orlando 1 investment as a real estate investment and the Orlando 2 investment as an equity method investment. Because the Company is now entitled to greater than 50% of the residual profits from the Orlando 2 investment, the Company accounts for this investment as a real estate investment in its consolidated financial statements. The Company will continue to account for the Orlando 1 investment as a real estate investment. Accordingly, as of August 9, 2017, the Company wholly owns and consolidates these investments in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The Company evaluated the 2018 and 2017 purchases under ASU 2017-01 and concluded that the transactions consisted of a single identifiable asset that represents substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired. Therefore, these transactions do not constitute the purchase of a business and have been treated as asset acquisitions. In accordance with ASU 2017-01, as of the respective acquisition dates, the Company’s basis in the self-storage real estate owned is recorded at cost (generally equal to the cash consideration paid, assumed liabilities, if applicable, and the funded loan balance, net of unamortized origination fees), plus unrealized gains recorded at the date of acquisition. The allocation to the basis of the assets acquired is based on their relative fair values.

The following table shows the Company’s basis as of the date of acquisition for the facilities acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018:


		Jacksonville 1		Atlanta 1		Atlanta 2		Pittsburgh		Charlotte 1		New York City 1		Totals
Development property investment at fair value	$	8,913	$	10,788	$	8,666	$	6,914	$	9,596	$	21,513	$	66,390
Cash consideration, inclusive of transaction costs (1)		2,625		2,342		2,960		1,719		3,061		3,845		16,552
Assumed liabilities (2)		-		-		-		252		-		-		252
Net property working capital acquired		95		41		40		40		89		90		395
Total cost basis	$	11,633	$	13,171	$	11,666	$	8,925	$	12,746	$	25,448	$	83,589

⁽¹⁾

Includes $0.1 million of cash consideration payable in nine months and $69,000 of transaction costs incurred but not yet paid as of December 31, 2018.

⁽²⁾

Included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018.

The following table shows the Company’s basis as of the date of acquisition for the facility acquired during the year ended December 31, 2017:


Development property investment at fair value	$	12,919
Cash consideration paid, inclusive of transaction costs		2,856
Net property working capital acquired		52
Total cost basis	$	15,827

Table of Contents

The following table shows the impact of these real estate investments on the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:


	December 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Land	$	10,797	$	1,505
Building and improvements		85,067		13,720
In-place leases		3,552		602
Property equipment		13		-
Construction-in-progress		670		-
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(3,897)		(472)
Self-storage real estate owned	$	96,202	$	15,355

The following table shows the impact of these real estate investments on the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:


	Year ended		Year ended
	December 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Rental and other property-related income from real estate owned	$	3,499	$	530

Property operating expenses of real estate owned		(1,712)		(271)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(3,425)		(472)
Total expenses of real estate owned	$	(5,137)	$	(743)

4. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value option under ASC 825‑10 allows companies to elect to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company has elected the fair value option of accounting for its development property investments, bridge investments and operating property loan investments in order to provide stockholders and others who rely on the Company’s financial statements with a more complete and accurate understanding of the Company’s economic performance, including its revenues and value inherent in its equity participation in self-storage development projects.

The Company applies ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an investment in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 requires the Company to assume that the investment is sold in its principal market to market participants or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company considers its principal market as the market for the purchase and sale of self-storage properties, which the Company believes would be the most likely market for the Company’s loan and equity investments given the nature of the collateral securing such loans and the types of borrowers. ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. In accordance with ASC 820, these inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:


Level 1‑	Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market.

Level 2‑	Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on the following: (i) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (ii) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets; (iii) Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3‑	Prices or valuation techniques based on inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

Table of Contents

Level 1 instruments in the measurement of fair value. Other loans, the secured revolving credit facility and senior loan participations are categorized as Level 2 instruments in the measurement of fair value as the fair values of these investments are determined using a discounted cash flow model with inputs from third-party pricing sources and similar instruments. The following table summarizes the instruments categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure their fair value.



Instrument	Valuation technique and assumptions	Hierarchy classification

Development property investments	Valuations are determined using an Income Approach analysis, using the discounted cash flow method model, capturing the prepayment penalty / call price schedule as applicable. The valuation models are calibrated to the total investment net drawn amount as of the issuance date.	Level 3

Development property investments with a profits interest and bridge investments (a)	Valuations are determined using an Income Approach analysis, using the discounted cash flow method model, capturing the prepayment penalty / call price schedule as applicable. The valuation models are calibrated to the total investment net drawn amount as of the issuance date factoring in the value of the Profits Interests. Typically, the calibration is done on an investment level basis. In certain instances, we may acquire a portfolio of investments in which case the calibration is done on an aggregate basis to the aggregate net drawn amount as of the date of issuance.	Level 3

	An option-pricing method (“OPM”) framework is utilized to calculate the value of the Profits Interests. At certain stages in the investments life cycle (as described subsequently), the OPM requires an enterprise value derived from fair value of the underlying real estate project. The fair value of the underlying real estate project is determined using either a discounted cash flows model or direct capitalization approach. The Company engaged a third-party independent valuation firm to perform certain limited procedures that the Company identified and requested the independent valuation firm to perform. The analysis performed by the independent valuation firm was based upon data and assumptions provided to it by the Company and received from third party sources. The independent valuation firm relied on certain data and assumptions provided to it by the Company as being accurate while independently verifying others through the use of third party sources. Upon completion of the limited procedures, the independent valuation firm concluded that the fair value of investments subjected to the limited procedures appears to be reasonable. The Company is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of the investments on a quarterly basis in good faith.

Operating property loans	Valuations are determined using an Income Approach analysis, using the discounted cash flow method model, capturing the prepayment penalty / call price schedule as applicable.	Level 3

^(a)

Certain of the Company’s development property investments include Profits Interests.

The Company’s development property investments, bridge investments and operating property loan investments are valued using two different valuation techniques. The first valuation technique is an income approach analysis of the debt instrument components of the Company’s

Table of Contents

investments. The second valuation technique is an OPM that is used to determine the fair value of any Profits Interests associated with an investment. The valuation models are calibrated to the total investment net drawn amount as of the issuance date factoring in the value of the Profits Interests. At the issuance date of each development property investment, generally the value of the property underlying such investment approximates the sum of the net investment drawn amount plus the developer’s equity investment. Typically the calibration is done on an investment level basis. To the extent investments are entered into on a portfolio basis, the valuation models are calibrated on an aggregate basis to the aggregate net investment proceeds using the overall implied internal rate of return using a discounted cash flow for each investment.

For development property investments with a Profits Interest, at a certain stage of construction, the OPM incorporates an adjustment to measure entrepreneurial profit. Entrepreneurial profit is a monetary return above total construction costs that provides compensation for the risk of a development project. Under this method, the value of each property is estimated based on the cost incurred to date, plus an estimated earned entrepreneurial profit. Total entrepreneurial profit is estimated as the difference between the projected value of a property at stabilization and the total development costs, including land, building improvements, and lease-up costs. Utilizing information obtained from the market coupled with the Company’s own experience, the Company has estimated that in most cases, approximately one-third of the entrepreneurial profit is earned during the construction period beginning when construction is approximately 40% complete and ending when construction is substantially complete, and approximately two-thirds of the entrepreneurial profit is earned when construction is substantially complete through stabilization. For the eight development property investments that were 40% complete but for which construction was not substantially complete at December 31, 2018, the Company has estimated the entrepreneurial profit adjustment to the enterprise value input used in the OPM to be equal to one-third of the estimated entrepreneurial profit, allocated on a straight-line basis. Twenty-seven development property and bridge investments, not including the properties reported as self-storage real estate owned, had reached substantial construction completion and/or received a certificate of occupancy at December 31, 2018. For the Company’s development property and bridge investments at substantial construction completion, a discounted cash flow model, based on periodically updated estimates of rental rates, occupancy and operating expenses, is the primary method for projecting value of a project. The Company also will consider inputs such as appraisals which differ from the developer’s equity investment, bona fide third-party offers to purchase development projects, sales of development projects, or sales of comparable properties in its markets.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The following tables summarize the significant unobservable inputs the Company used to value its investments categorized within Level 3 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. These tables are not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead to capture the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the Company’s determination of fair values.


As of December 31, 2018
		Unobservable Inputs
	Primary Valuation			Weighted
Asset Category	Techniques	Input	Estimated Range	Average

Development property	Income approach analysis	Market yields/discount rate	4.72 - 13.09%	9.48%
investments and bridge investments (a)		Exit date (d)	2.25 - 5.95 years	3.44 years

Development property	Option pricing model	Volatility	53.25 - 94.30%	75.10%
investments with a profits interest		Exit date (d)	2.25 - 5.95 years	3.44 years
and bridge investments (b)		Capitalization rate (c)	4.75 - 6.00%	5.42%
		Discount rate (c)	7.75 - 11.74%	8.83%

^(a)

^(b)

The valuation technique for the development property investments with a Profits Interest does not differ from the development property investments without a Profits Interest. The development property investments with a Profits Interest only require incremental valuation techniques to determine the value of the Profits Interest. Therefore this line only focuses on the Profits Interest valuation.

100

Table of Contents

^(c)

Thirty-five properties were 40% - 100% complete, thus requiring a capitalization rate and/or discount rate to derive entrepreneurial profit which are used to derive the enterprise value input to the OPM. Capitalization rates are estimated based on current data derived from independent sources in the markets in which the Company holds investments.

^(d)

The exit dates for the development property investments and bridge investments are generally the estimated date of stabilization of the underlying property.



As of December 31, 2017
		Unobservable Inputs
	Primary Valuation			Weighted
Asset Category	Techniques	Input	Estimated Range	Average

Development property investments (a)	Income approach analysis	Market yields/discount rate	7.83 - 10.62%	9.00%
		Exit date (d)	0.08 - 6.71 years	2.96 years

Development property investments with a profits interest (b)	Option pricing model	Volatility	63.94 - 94.03%	74.08%
		Exit date (d)	0.42 - 6.71 years	3.12 years
		Capitalization rate (c)	5.50 - 6.15%	5.51%
		Discount rate (c)	8.50 - 9.15%	8.51%

Operating property loans	Income approach analysis	Market yields/discount rate	6.08 - 7.01%	6.47%
		Exit date (d)	3.98 - 4.65 years	4.37 years

^(a)

^(b)

The valuation technique for the development property investments with a Profits Interest does not differ from the development property investments without a Profits Interest. The development property investments with a Profits Interest only require incremental valuation techniques to determine the value of the Profits Interest. Therefore this line only focuses on the Profits Interest valuation.

^(c)

Eighteen properties were 40% - 100% complete, thus requiring a capitalization rate and/or discount rate to derive entrepreneurial profit, which are used to derive the enterprise value input to the OPM. Capitalization rates are estimated based on current data derived from independent sources in the markets in which the Company holds investments.

^(d)

The exit dates for the development property investments are generally the estimated date of stabilization of the underlying property. The exit dates for the operating property loans are the contractual maturity dates.

Market yields - changes in market yields and discount rates, each in isolation, may change the fair value of certain of the Company’s investments. Generally, an increase in market yields or discount rates may result in a decrease in the fair value of certain of the Company’s investments. The following fluctuations in the market yields/discount rates would have had the following impact on the fair value of our investments:


	Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments
Change in market yields/discount rates (in millions)	December 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Up 25 basis points	$	(1.9)	$	(1.2)
Down 25 basis points, subject to a minimum yield/rate of 10 basis points		2.0		1.2

Up 50 basis points		(3.9)		(2.3)
Down 50 basis points, subject to a minimum yield/rate of 10 basis points		4.1		2.4

101

Table of Contents

Capitalization rate - changes in capitalization rate, in isolation and all else equal, may change the fair value of certain of the Company’s development investments containing Profits Interests. Generally, an increase in the capitalization rate assumption may result in a decrease in the fair value of the Company’s investments. The following fluctuations in the capitalization rates would have had the following impact on the fair value of the Company’s investments:


	Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments
Change in capitalization rates (in millions)	December 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Up 25 basis points	$	(8.9)	$	(2.8)
Down 25 basis points		9.8		3.1

Up 50 basis points		(17.0)		(5.3)
Down 50 basis points		20.5		6.4

Exit date - changes in exit date, in isolation and all else equal, may change the fair value of certain of the Company’s investments that have Profits Interests. Generally, an acceleration in the exit date assumption may result in an increase in the fair value of the Company’s investments.

Volatility - changes in volatility, in isolation and all else equal, may change the fair value of certain of the Company’s investments that have Profits Interests. Generally, an increase in volatility may result in an increase in the fair value of the Profits Interests in certain of the Company’s investments.

Operating cash flow projections - changes in the operating cash flow projections of the underlying self-storage facilities, in isolation and all else equal, may change the fair value of certain of the Company’s investments that have Profits Interests. Generally, an increase in operating cash flow projections may result in an increase in the fair value of the Profits Interests in certain of the Company’s investments.

The Company also evaluates the impact of changes in instrument-specific credit risk in determining the fair value of investments. There were no gains or losses attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk in the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of the Company’s investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that the Company may ultimately realize. Further, such investments are generally subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded securities. If the Company was required to liquidate an investment in a forced or liquidation sale, it could realize significantly less than the value at which the Company has recorded it. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the unrealized gains or losses reflected in the valuations currently assigned.

The following tables present changes in investments that use Level 3 inputs:



	Year ended December 31,
	2018		2017
Balance at beginning of period	$	234,171	$	105,007
Realized gains		(619)		-
Unrealized gains		43,564		10,804
Fundings of principal and change in unamortized origination fees		257,454		150,217
Repayments of loans		(33,047)		(27,513)
Payment-in-kind interest		22,814		8,575
Reclassification of self-storage real estate owned		(66,390)		(12,919)
Net transfers in or out of Level 3		-		-
Balance at end of period	$	457,947	$	234,171

102

Table of Contents

On August 28, 2018, the underlying asset for the Tampa 1 investment was sold to a third party and proceeds were distributed to the Company in settlement of the first mortgage loan and 49.9% Profits Interest. The following tables reflect the various financial components related to the transaction:


Tampa 1 investment as of June 30, 2018:
Fair value of investment	$	5,931
Funded investment, net of unamortized origination fee		5,260
Unrealized gain recorded as of June 30, 2018	$	671

Cash received on third party sale	$	6,010
Funded investment		(5,285)
Value realized		725
Unrealized gain recorded as of June 30, 2018		(671)
Income realized in excess of unrealized gain previously recorded	$	54



Value realized:			Classification in Statement of Operations
Profits interest	$	619	Realized gain on investments
Prepayment penalty		106	Interest income on investments
	$	725

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the total net unrealized appreciation on the investments that use Level 3 inputs was $51.0 million and $26.3 million, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, substantially all of the net unrealized gain on investments in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations were attributable to unrealized gains relating to the Company’s Level 3 assets still held as of the respective balance sheet date.

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the quarter in which the transfers occur.

5. INVESTMENT IN SELF-STORAGE REAL ESTATE VENTURE

On March 7, 2016, the Company, through its Operating Company, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “JV Agreement”) of Storage Lenders LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to form a real estate venture (the “SL1 Venture”) with HVP III Storage Lenders Investor, LLC (“HVP III”), an investment vehicle managed by Heitman Capital Management LLC (“Heitman”). The SL1 Venture was formed for the purpose of providing capital to developers of self-storage facilities identified and underwritten by the Company. Upon formation, HVP III committed $110.0 million for a 90% interest in the SL1 Venture, and the Company committed $12.2 million for a 10% interest.

On March 31, 2016, the Company contributed to the SL1 Venture three of its existing development property investments with a Profits Interest located in Miami and Fort Lauderdale, Florida that were not yet under construction. These investments had an aggregate committed principal amount of approximately $41.9 million and an aggregate drawn balance of $8.1 million. In exchange, the Company’s initial funding commitment of $12.2 million was reduced by $8.1 million, representing the Company’s initial “Net Invested Capital” balance as defined in the JV Agreement. The Company accounted for this contribution in accordance with ASC 845, Nonmonetary Transactions, and recorded an investment in the SL1 Venture based on the fair value of the contributed development property investments, which is the same as carryover basis. The fair value of the contributed development property investments as of March 31, 2016 was $7.7 million. Pursuant to the JV Agreement, Heitman, in fulfilling its initial $110.0 million commitment, provides capital to the SL1 Venture as cash is required, including funding draws on the three contributed development property investments. During the year ended December 31, 2016, HVP III and the Company agreed to true up the balances in the respective members’ capital accounts to be in accordance with the 90% commitment and 10% commitment made by HVP III and the Company, respectively. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2016, HVP III contributed cash of $7.3 million to the SL1 Venture, and the Company received a $7.3 million cash distribution as a return of its capital.

103

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2018, the SL1 Venture had closed on eight new development property investments with a Profits Interest with an aggregate commitment amount of approximately $81.4 million, bringing the total aggregate commitment of the SL1 Venture’s investments to $123.3 million as of December 31, 2018. Accordingly, HVP III’s total commitment for a 90% interest in the SL1 Venture is $111.0 million, and the Company’s total commitment for a 10% interest in the SL1 Venture is $12.3 million.

Under the JV Agreement, the Company receives a priority distribution (after debt service and any reserve but before any other distributions) out of operating cash flow and residual distributions based upon 1% of the committed principal amount of loans made by the SL1 Venture, exclusive of the loans contributed to the SL1 Venture by the Company. Operating cash flow of the SL1 Venture (after debt service, reserves and the foregoing priority distributions) is distributed in accordance with capital commitments. Residual cash flow from capital and other events (after debt service, reserves and priority distributions) will be distributed (i) pro rata in accordance with capital commitments (its “Percentage Interest”) until each member has received a return of all capital contributed; (ii) pro rata in accordance with each member’s Percentage Interest until Heitman has achieved a 14% internal rate of return; (iii) to Heitman in an amount equal to its Percentage Interest less 10% and to the Company in an amount equal to the Company’s Percentage Interest plus 10% until Heitman has achieved a 17% internal rate of return; (iv) to Heitman in an amount equal to its Percentage Interest less 20% and to the Company in an amount equal to the Company’s Percentage Interest plus 20% until Heitman has achieved a 20% internal rate of return; and (v) any excess to Heitman in an amount equal to its Percentage Interest less 30% and to the Company in an amount equal to the Company’s Percentage Interest plus 30%. However, the Company will not be entitled to any such promoted interest prior to the earlier to occur of the third anniversary of the JV Agreement and Heitman receiving distributions to the extent necessary to provide Heitman with a 1.48 multiple on its contributed capital.

Since the allocation of cash distributions and liquidating distributions are determined as described in the preceding paragraph, the Company has applied the hypothetical-liquidation-at-book-value (“HLBV”) method to allocate the earnings of the SL1 Venture. Under the HLBV approach, the Company’s share of the investee’s earnings or loss is calculated by:

The Company’s capital account at the end of the period assuming that the investee was liquidated or sold at book value, plus

Cash distributions received by the Company during the period, minus

Cash contributions made by the Company during the period, minus

The Company’s capital account at the beginning of the period assuming that the investee were liquidated or sold at book value.

The SL1 Venture has elected the fair value option of accounting for its development property investments with a Profits Interest, which are equity method investments of the SL1 Venture. The assumptions used to value the SL1 Venture’s investments are materially consistent with those used to value the Company’s investments. As of December 31, 2018, the SL1 Venture had eleven development property investments with a Profits Interest as described in more detail in the table below:



	Metropolitan					Remaining
	Statistical Area	Total Investment		Funded		Unfunded
Closing Date	("MSA")	Commitment		Investment (1)		Commitment		Fair Value
5/14/2015	Miami 1 (2)(3)	$	13,867	$	12,250	$	1,617	$	14,338
5/14/2015	Miami 2 (2)(3)		14,849		13,961		888		14,562
9/25/2015	Fort Lauderdale (2)(3)		13,230		12,352		878		16,409
4/15/2016	Washington DC (3)		17,269		17,005		264		19,200
4/29/2016	Atlanta 1 (3)(4)		10,223		9,915		308		11,352
7/19/2016	Jacksonville (3)(4)		8,127		7,422		705		11,406
7/21/2016	New Jersey (3)		7,828		5,749		2,079		6,717
8/15/2016	Atlanta 2 (3)(4)		8,772		8,293		479		9,004
8/25/2016	Denver (3)(4)		11,032		10,221		811		12,716
9/28/2016	Columbia (3)		9,199		8,868		331		9,972
12/22/2016	Raleigh (3)		8,877		8,432		445		9,450
	Total	$	123,273	$	114,468	$	8,805	$	135,126

⁽¹⁾

Represents principal balance of loan gross of origination fees. The principal balance includes interest accrued on the investment.

⁽²⁾

These development property investments (having approximately $8.1 million of outstanding principal at contribution) were contributed to the SL1 Venture on March 31, 2016 by the Company.

104

Table of Contents

⁽³⁾

⁽⁴⁾

On January 28, 2019, the SL1 Venture purchased its developer partner’s 50.1% equity interest in this investment. As a result, the SL1 Venture now wholly owns the self-storage property.

As of December 31, 2018, the SL1 Venture had total assets of $135.2 million and total liabilities of $0.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the SL1 Venture had net income of $13.8 million, of which $1.5 million was allocated to the Company and $12.3 million was allocated to HVP III under the HLBV method. At December 31, 2018, $0.2 million of transaction expenses were included in the carrying amount of the Company’s investment in the SL1 Venture. Additionally, the Company may from time to time make advances to the SL1 Venture. At December 31, 2018, the Company had $0.4 million in advances to the SL1 Venture, and the related interest on these advances are classified in equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

As of December 31, 2017, the SL1 Venture had total assets of $103.7 million and total liabilities of $3.3 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the SL1 Venture had net income of $18.7 million, of which $2.3 million was allocated to the Company and $16.4 million was allocated to HVP III under the HLBV method. At December 31, 2017, $0.2 million of transaction expenses were included in the carrying amount of the Company’s investment in the SL1 Venture. Additionally, the Company may from time to time make advances to the SL1 Venture. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $3.2 million in advances to the SL1 Venture, and the related interest on these advances are classified in equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the SL1 Venture had net income of $1.1 million, of which $1.2 million was allocated to the Company and a loss of $0.1 million was allocated to HVP III under the HLBV method.

In accordance with the JV Agreement, for each development property investment, the borrower must deliver to the SL1 Venture a completion guarantee whereby the borrower agrees to cover all costs in excess of the agreed-upon budget amount. Additionally, the Company is required to deliver to the SL1 Venture a backstop completion guarantee for each development property investment to guarantee completion in the event the borrower does not satisfy its obligations. The Company concluded that the likelihood of loss is remote and assigned no value to these guarantees as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. As of December 31, 2018, all of the development property investments included in the SL1 Venture were open and operating or construction was substantially complete.

Under the JV Agreement, Heitman and the Company will seek to obtain and, if obtained, will share joint rights of first refusal to acquire self-storage facilities that are the subject of development property investments made by the SL1 Venture. Additionally, so long as the Company, through its operating subsidiary, is a member of the SL1 Venture and the SL1 Venture holds any assets, the Company will not make any investment of debt or equity or otherwise, directly or indirectly, in one or more new joint ventures or similar programs for the purposes of funding or providing development loans or financing, directly or indirectly, for the development, construction or conversion of self-storage facilities, in each case without first offering such opportunity to Heitman to participate on substantially the same terms as those set forth in the JV Agreement, either through the SL1 Venture or a newly formed real estate venture.

The JV Agreement permits Heitman to cause the Company to repurchase from Heitman its Developer Equity Interests (as defined in the JV Agreement) in certain limited circumstances. Under the JV Agreement, if a developer causes to be refinanced a self-storage facility with respect to which the SL1 Venture has made a development property investment and such refinancing does not coincide with a sale of the underlying self-storage facility, then at any time after the fourth anniversary of the commencement of the SL1 Venture, Heitman may either put to the Company its share of the Developer Equity Interests in respect of each such development property investment, or sell Heitman’s Developer Equity Interests to a third party. The Company concluded that the likelihood of loss is remote and assigned no value to these puts as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

The Company is the managing member of the SL1 Venture and will manage and administer (i) the day-to-day business and affairs of the SL1 Venture and any of its acquired properties and (ii) loan servicing and other administration of the approved development property investments. The Company will be paid a monthly expense reimbursement amount by the SL1 Venture in connection with its role as managing member, as

105

Table of Contents

set forth in the JV Agreement. Heitman may remove the Company as the managing member of the SL1 Venture if it commits an event of default (as defined in the JV Agreement), if it undergoes a change of control (as defined in the JV Agreement), or if it becomes insolvent.

Heitman approves all “Major Decisions” of the SL1 Venture, as defined in the JV Agreement, including, but not limited to, each investment of capital, the incurrence of any indebtedness, the sale or other disposition of assets of the SL1 Venture, the replacement of the managing member, the acceptance of new members into the SL1 Venture and the liquidation of the SL1 Venture.

For four of the SL1 Venture development property investments with a Profits Interest, an investor has an option to put its interest to the Company upon the event of default of the underlying property loans. The put options, if exercised, require the Company to purchase the member’s interest at the original purchase price plus a yield of 4.5% on such purchase price. The Company concluded that the likelihood of loss is remote and assigned no value to these put options at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

6. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Development Property Investments and Bridge Investments

The Company holds variable interests in its development property investments and bridge investments. The Company has determined that these investees qualify as VIEs because the entities do not have enough equity to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support. In determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the development property VIEs, the Company identified the activities that most significantly impact the development property VIEs’ economic performance. Such activities are (1) managing the construction and operations of the project, (2) selecting the property manager, (3) making financing decisions, (4) authorizing capital expenditures and (5) disposing of the property. Although the Company has certain participating and protective rights, it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the development property VIEs’ economic performance and is not the primary beneficiary; therefore, the Company does not consolidate the development property VIEs.

The Company has recorded assets of $457.9 million and $228.2 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, for its variable interest in the development property and bridge investment VIEs which is included in the development property investments and bridge investments at fair value line items in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the development property and bridge investment VIEs is as follows:



	December 31,
	2018		2017
Assets recorded related to VIEs	$	457,947	$	228,233
Unfunded loan commitments to VIEs		220,877		310,750
Maximum exposure to loss	$	678,824	$	538,983

The Company has a construction completion guaranty from the managing members of the development property VIEs or individual affiliates/owners of such managing members.

Investment in Real Estate Venture

The Company determined that the SL1 Venture qualifies as a VIE because it does not have enough equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. In determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the entity, the Company identified the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. Such activities are (1) approving self-storage development investments and acquiring self-storage properties, (2) managing directly-owned properties, (3) obtaining debt financing, and (4) disposing of investments. Although the Company has certain rights, it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and thus is not the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company does not consolidate the entity and accounts for its unconsolidated interest in the SL1 Venture using the equity method of accounting. The Company’s investment in the SL1 Venture is included in the investment in and advances to self-storage real estate venture balance in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and earnings from the SL1 Venture are included in equity in earnings from unconsolidated real estate venture in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company’s maximum contribution to the SL1 Venture is $12.3 million, and as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s remaining unfunded commitment to the SL1 Venture is $0.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had $0.4 million and $3.2 million, respectively, in advances to the SL1 Venture.

106

Table of Contents

7. DEBT

Credit Facility

On December 28, 2018, the Operating Company entered into an amended and restated senior secured revolving credit facility of up to $235 million with KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Raymond James Bank, N.A. and BMO Capital Markets Corp., as joint lead arrangers and syndication agents, and the other lenders party thereto (the “Credit Facility”). Pursuant to an accordion feature, the Operating Company may from time to time increase the commitments up to an aggregate amount of $400 million, subject to, among other things, an absence of default under the Credit Facility, as well as receiving commitments from lenders for the additional amounts. The Operating Company typically uses borrowings under the Credit Facility to fund its investments, to make secured or unsecured loans to borrowers in connection with its investments and for general corporate purposes.

On December 28, 2018, the Company and certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Operating Company (the “Subsidiaries”) entered into an Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance whereby they have agreed to unconditionally guarantee the obligations of the Operating Company under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is secured by a portion of the Company’s investments made through the Subsidiaries, and other subsidiaries of the Operating Company may be added as guarantors from time to time during the term of the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility has a scheduled maturity date on December 28, 2021, with two one-year extension options to extend the maturity of the facility to December 28, 2023. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by three different pools of collateral: the first consisting of the Company’s mortgage loans extended to developers, the second consisting of certain non-stabilized self-storage properties owned by the Company and the third consisting of certain stabilized self-storage properties owned by the Company or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

The amount available to borrow under the Credit Facility is limited according to a borrowing base valuation of the assets available as collateral. For loans secured by Company mortgage loans, the borrowing base availability is the lesser of (i) 60% of the outstanding balance of the Company mortgage loans and (ii) the maximum principal amount which would not cause the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility secured by the Company mortgage loans to be greater than 50% of the underlying real estate asset fair value securing the Company mortgage loans. For loans secured by non-stabilized self-storage properties, the borrowing base availability is the lesser of (i) the maximum principal amount that would not cause the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility secured by the non-stabilized self-storage properties to be greater than 60% of the as-stabilized value of such non-stabilized self-storage properties, (ii) the maximum principal amount which would not cause the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility to be greater than 75% of the total development cost of the non-stabilized self-storage properties, and (iii) whichever of the following is then applicable: (a) the maximum principal amount that would not cause the ratio of (1) stabilized net operating income from the non-stabilized self-storage properties included in the borrowing base divided by (2) an implied debt service coverage amount to be less than 1.35 to 1.00, (b) for any underlying real estate asset securing the non-stabilized self-storage properties that has been included in the borrowing base for greater than 18 months, the maximum principal amount which would not cause the ratio of (1) actual adjusted net operating income for the underlying real estate asset securing such non-stabilized self-storage properties divided by (2) an implied debt service amount to be less than 0.50 to 1.00, and (c) for any underlying real estate asset securing the non-stabilized self-storage properties that has been included in the borrowing base for greater than 30 months, the maximum principal amount which would not cause the ratio of (1) actual adjusted net operating income for the underlying real estate asset securing such non-stabilized self-storage properties divided by (2) an implied debt service amount to be less than 1.00 to 1.00. For loans secured by stabilized self-storage properties, the borrowing base availability is the lesser of (i) the maximum principal amount that would not cause the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility secured by the underlying real estate asset securing the stabilized self-storage properties to be greater than 65% of the value of such self-storage properties and (ii) the maximum principal amount that would not cause the ratio of (i) aggregate adjusted net operating income from the underlying real estate asset securing such stabilized self-storage properties included in the borrowing base divided by (ii) an implied debt service coverage amount to be less than 1.30 to 1.00.

The Credit Facility includes certain requirements that may limit the borrowing capacity available to the Company from time to time. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the outstanding principal balance of the revolving credit loans, swing loans and letter of credit liabilities under the Credit Facility may not exceed the borrowing base availability.

Each loan made under the Credit Facility bears interest at either, at the Operating Company’s election, (i) a base rate plus a margin of 1.25%, 1.75% or 2.25% or (ii) LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25%, 2.75% or 3.25%, in each case depending on the borrowing base available for such loan. In addition, the Operating Company is required to pay a fee of a per diem rate of either 0.25% or 0.30% per annum, depending on the amount outstanding under the Credit Facility at the time, times the excess of the sum of the commitments of the lenders, as in effect from time to time, over the outstanding principal amount of revolving credit loans under the Credit Facility.

107

Table of Contents

The Credit Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties and financial and other affirmative and negative covenants. The Operating Company’s ability to borrow under the Credit Facility is subject to ongoing compliance by the Company and the Operating Company with various customary restrictive covenants, including but not limited to limitations on its incurrence of indebtedness, investments, dividends, asset sales, acquisitions, mergers and consolidations and liens and encumbrances. In addition, the Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants including the following:

total consolidated indebtedness not exceeding 50% of gross asset value;

a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (defined as the ratio of consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to consolidated fixed charges) of 1.20 to 1.00 during the period between December 28, 2018 and December 31, 2020, 1.30 to 1.00 during the period between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 and 1.40 to 1.00 during the period between January 1, 2023 through the maturity of the Credit Facility;

a minimum consolidated tangible net worth (defined as gross asset value less total consolidated indebtedness) of $373.6 million plus 75% of the sum of any additional net offering proceeds;

when aggregate loan commitments under the Credit Facility exceed $50 million, unhedged variable rate debt cannot exceed 40% of consolidated total indebtedness;

liquidity of no less than the greater of (a) future funding commitments of us and our subsidiaries for the three months following each date of determination and (b) $50 million for the period between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019 or on and after January 1, 2020, liquidity of no less than the greater of (i) future funding commitments of the Company and its subsidiaries for the six months following each date of determination and (ii) $50 million; and

a debt service coverage ratio (defined as the ratio of consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to the Company’s consolidated interest expense and debt principal payments for any given period) of 2.00 to 1.00.

The Credit Facility provides for standard events of default, including nonpayment of principal and other amounts when due, non-performance of covenants, breach of representations and warranties, certain bankruptcy or insolvency events, and changes in control. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the Credit Facility, the lenders may, among other things, terminate their commitments under the Credit Facility and require the immediate payment of all amounts owed thereunder.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and $91.3 million was available for borrowing under the Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants of the Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, certain of the Company’s development property investments, bridge investments, and operating property loans as described in Note 3, Self-Storage Investment Portfolio, were pledged as collateral against the Credit Facility. In addition, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the New York City 1 and the Orlando 1/2 owned properties, respectively, which are included in self-storage real estate owned, net, were pledged as collateral against the Credit Facility.

Term Loans

On August 17, 2018, the Company entered into loan agreements (the “FirstBank Term Loans”) with FirstBank (“FirstBank”) with respect to three term loans in the aggregate principal amount of $24.9 million. The FirstBank Term Loans are secured by first mortgages on the Company’s three wholly-owned self-storage facilities located in Orlando, Florida and Atlanta, Georgia. As a condition to FirstBank providing the FirstBank Term Loans, the Company has agreed to unconditionally guarantee the subsidiaries’ obligations under the FirstBank Term Loans pursuant to guaranty agreements with FirstBank (the “FirstBank Guaranties”).

The FirstBank Term Loans will mature on August 1, 2021. Borrowings under the FirstBank Term Loans bear interest at a floating variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.25%, which is reset monthly.

108

Table of Contents

The FirstBank Term Loans contain customary representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants. The FirstBank Term Loans contain a financial covenant that requires the Operating Company to maintain a debt service coverage ratio of 1.35 to 1. The debt service coverage ratio will be calculated pursuant to the terms of the Credit Facility. FirstBank is a lender under the Credit Facility. The FirstBank Term Loans also contain a covenant that requires the Operating Company to maintain a loan to value ratio on the outstanding balance of the loan that does not exceed the loan to value ratio at closing.

The FirstBank Term Loans provide for standard events of default, including nonpayment of principal and other amounts when due, non-performance of covenants, breach of representations and warranties and certain bankruptcy or insolvency events. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the FirstBank Term Loans, FirstBank may, among other things, terminate its commitments under the FirstBank Term Loans and require the immediate payment of all amounts owed thereunder. The FirstBank Term Loans each contain cross-default provisions with the Credit Facility, pursuant to which an event of default under the FirstBank Term Loans is triggered by the occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Facility that results in acceleration of the outstanding obligations of the Operating Company under the Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants of the FirstBank Term Loans.

Senior Participation

On May 27, 2016, the Company sold a senior participation in a construction loan on a facility in the Miami, Florida MSA (“the Miami A Note”), having a commitment amount of $17.7 million in exchange for a commitment by the bank to provide net proceeds of $10.0 million to fund construction draws under the construction loan (the “Miami A Note Sale”) once the total outstanding principal balance exceeded $7.7 million. The Miami A Note Sale was effected pursuant to a participation agreement between the bank and the Company (the “Miami Participation Agreement”). Under the Miami Participation Agreement, the Company continued to service the underlying loan as long as it was not in default under the Miami Participation Agreement. The bank had the option to “put” the senior participation to the Company in the event the underlying borrower defaulted on the underlying loan or if the Company defaulted under the Miami Participation Agreement. As part of the Participation Agreement, the Company maintained a minimum aggregate balance of $0.5 million in depository or money market accounts at the bank, and if such balance was not maintained, the interest rate would have increased. The Company paid to the bank interest on the outstanding balance of the Miami A Note at the rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 3.10%. The Company also paid a loan fee of 100 basis points, or $0.1 million upon closing of the loan. The Miami A Note initially had a maturity date of July 1, 2017. On March 31, 2018, the maturity date was extended to June 30, 2018. The Company repurchased the Miami A Note on June 19, 2018. There was no outstanding balance for the Miami A Note as of December 31, 2018.

As of December 31, 2017, the Miami development property investment was pledged as collateral against the Company’s senior participation.

The table below details the bank commitment and outstanding balance of the Company’s senior participation at December 31, 2017:



	Commitment by Bank		Amount Borrowed		Remaining Funds		Interest Rate	Effective Interest Rate at December 31, 2017		Maturity Date(1)
Miami A Note	$	10,001	$	732	$	9,269	30-day LIBOR + 3.10%	4.66	%	January 31, 2018
Unamortized fees				(14)
Net balance			$	718

⁽¹⁾

On January 30, 2018, the maturity date was extended to March 31, 2018. On March 31, 2018, the maturity date was extended to June 30, 2018. On June 19, 2018, the Company repurchased the Miami A Note.

8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company had 20,430,218 and 14,429,055 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, which included 159,165 and 185,002 shares of non-vested restricted stock, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company had 125,000 and 40,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company also had 1,571,734 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018.

109

Table of Contents

Common Stock Offerings

On April 5, 2017, the Company entered into an at-the-market continuous equity offering program (“ATM Program”) with an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. On December 7, 2018, the Company entered into a new Equity Distribution Agreement with an aggregate offering price under the ATM Program of up to $75.0 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has issued and sold an aggregate of 2,281,774 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $21.79 per share under the ATM Programs, receiving net proceeds after commissions and other offering costs of $48.3 million.

On June 27, 2017, the Company received $83.9 million in proceeds, net of underwriters’ discounts and offering costs payable by the Company, related to the public offering of 4,025,000 shares of common stock.

On June 14, 2018, the Company received $81.1 million in proceeds, net of underwriters’ discounts and offering costs payable by the Company, related to the public offering of 4,600,000 shares of common stock.

Stock Repurchase Plan

On May 20, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $10.0 million of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had repurchased and retired a total of 213,078 shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $3.2 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has $6.8 million remaining under the Board’s authorization to repurchase shares of its common stock.

Equity Incentive Plan

In connection with the IPO, the Company established the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan for the purpose of attracting and retaining directors, executive officers, investment professionals and other key personnel and service providers, including officers and employees of the Manager and other affiliates, and to stimulate their efforts toward the Company’s continued success, long-term growth and profitability. The 2015 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of stock options, share awards (including restricted common stock and restricted stock units), stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, performance awards, annual incentive cash awards and other equity-based awards, including Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) units, which are convertible on a one-for-one basis into Operating Company Units (“OC Units”). A total of 200,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the plan. On May 3, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved, and the Company adopted, the Amended and Restated 2015 Stock Incentive Plan increasing the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan by 170,000 shares from 200,000 shares to 370,000 shares and extending the term of the Plan until May 2, 2027.

Restricted Stock Awards

The Amended and Restated 2015 Equity Incentive Plan permits the issuance of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to employees of the Manager (as the Company has no employees) and the Company’s non-employee directors. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, 363,587 and 288,254 shares of restricted stock, respectively, had been granted, of which 55,172 vested in 2016, 46,413 vested in 2017, 99,503 vested during the year ended December 31, 2018, 70,834 will vest in 2019, 70,829 will vest in 2020 and 17,502 will vest in 2021. Additionally, 1,667 were forfeited during each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2016. Non-vested shares are earned over the respective vesting period based on a service condition only. Expenses related to restricted stock awards are charged to compensation expense and are recognized over the respective vesting period (primarily three to five years) of the awards. For restricted stock issued to non-employee directors of the Company, compensation expense is based on the market value of the shares at the grant date. For restricted stock awards issued to employees of the Manager, prior to the adoption of ASU 2018-07, compensation expense was re-measured at each reporting date until service was complete and the restricted shares became vested based on the then current value of the Company’s common stock. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-07 effective April 1, 2018, which established a grant date fair value of $18.10 based on the market value of the award as of April 1, 2018 for all nonemployee awards that have not vested as of April 1, 2018. Furthermore, for future awards, compensation expense is based on the market value of the shares at the grant date.

The Company recognized approximately $1.9 million, $1.3 million and $1.1 million of stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to the Company’s restricted shares was approximately $2.1 million, $2.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively, based on the grant date market value for awards issued to non-employee directors of the Company and the fair value of awards as of the adoption date of ASU 2018-07 for

110

Table of Contents

awards issued to employees of the Manager. This cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.8 years. The Company presents stock-based compensation expense in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

A summary of changes in the Company’s restricted shares of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:



	Year ended December 31,
	2018				2017
			Weighted				Weighted
			average grant				average grant
	Shares		date fair value		Shares		date fair value

Nonvested at beginning of period,		185,002	$	21.58		120,001	$	20.10
Granted		75,333		19.18		111,414		22.59
Vested		(99,503)		18.48		(46,413)		20.28
Forfeited		(1,667)		18.10		-		-
Nonvested at end of period,		159,165	$	18.39		185,002	$	21.58

Nonvested restricted shares of common stock receive dividends which are nonforfeitable.

Series A Preferred Stock Private Placement

On July 27, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with accounts managed by NexPoint Advisors, L.P., an affiliate of Highland Capital Management, L.P. (collectively, the “Buyers”) relating to the issuance and sale, from time to time until the second anniversary of the Effective Date (such period, the “Commitment Period”), of up to $125 million in shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), at a price of $1,000 per share (the “Liquidation Value”). The sale of shares of Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement may occur from time to time, in minimum monthly increments of $5 million, maximum monthly increments of $15 million and maximum increments of $35 million over any rolling three month period, all to be completed during the Commitment Period. The Company has issued all shares of Series A Preferred Stock available for issuance under the Purchase Agreement and the Articles Supplementary except for shares of Series A Preferred Stock issuable as in-kind dividends.

The Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior to the shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up and dissolution of the Company, on parity with any class or series of capital stock of the Company expressly designated as ranking on parity with the Series A Preferred Stock with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up and dissolution of the Company, junior to any class or series of capital stock of the Company expressly designated as ranking senior to the Series A Preferred Stock with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up and dissolution of the Company and junior in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future indebtedness.

Holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to a cumulative cash distribution (“Cash Distribution”) equal to (A) 7.0% per annum on the Liquidation Value for the period beginning on the respective date of issuance until the sixth anniversary of the Effective Date, payable quarterly in arrears, (B) 8.5% per annum on the Liquidation Value for the period beginning the day after the sixth anniversary of the Effective Date and for each year thereafter as long as the Series A Preferred Stock remains issued and outstanding, payable quarterly in arrears, and (C) an amount in addition to the amounts in (A) and (B) equal to 5.0% per annum on the Liquidation Value upon the occurrence of certain triggering events (a “Cash Premium”). In addition, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to a cumulative dividend payable in-kind in shares of Common Stock or additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock, at the election of the holders (the “Stock Dividend”), equal in the aggregate to the lesser of (Y) 25% of the incremental increase in the Company’s book value (as adjusted for equity capital issuances, share repurchases and certain non-cash expenses) plus, to the extent the Company owns equity interests in income-producing real property, the incremental increase in net asset value (provided, however, that no interest in the same real estate asset will be double counted) and (Z) an amount that would, together with the Cash Distribution, result in a 14.0% internal rate of return for the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock from the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, as set forth in the Articles Supplementary classifying the Series A Preferred Stock (the “Articles Supplementary”). Triggering events that will trigger the payment of a Cash Premium with respect to a Cash Distribution include: (i) the occurrence of certain change of control events affecting the Company after the third anniversary of the Effective Date, (ii) the Company’s ceasing to be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, (iii) the

111

Table of Contents

Company’s failure to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust, (iv) an event of default under the Purchase Agreement, (v) the failure by the Company to register for resale shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, (vi) the Company’s failure to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock as required by the Purchase Agreement, or (vii) the filing of a complaint, a settlement with, or a judgment entered by the Securities and Exchange Commission against the Company or any of its subsidiaries or a director or executive officer of the Company relating to the violation of the securities laws, rules or regulations with respect to the business of the Company.

On January 25, 2018, the Company filed, with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State of Maryland (“MSDAT”), Amendment No. 1 (the “Series A Articles Supplementary Amendment”) to the Articles Supplementary (the “Series A Articles Supplementary”) to the Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company (the “Charter”), designating the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Articles Supplementary Amendment provides for certain amendments to the calculation of the cumulative dividend in the Series A Articles Supplementary, including, among other things, with respect to the computation and payment of the Aggregate Stock Dividend (as defined in the Series A Articles Supplementary) for the fiscal quarters beginning with the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2018 through and including the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2021.

For the first three fiscal quarters of the fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020 and for the first fiscal quarter of 2021, the Company will declare and pay an Aggregate Stock Dividend equal to $2,125,000 (the “Target Stock Dividend”). For the last fiscal quarter of each of 2018, 2019 and 2020 and for the second fiscal quarter of 2021, the Company will compute the cumulative Aggregate Stock Dividend for all periods after December 31, 2017 through the end of such fiscal quarter equal to 25% of the incremental increase in the Company’s book value (as adjusted for equity capital issuances, share repurchases and certain non-cash expenses) plus, to the extent that we own equity interests in income-producing real property, the incremental increase in net asset value (provided, however, that no interest in the same real estate asset will be double counted) (the “Computed Stock Dividend”), and will declare and pay for such quarter an Aggregate Stock Dividend equal to the greater of the Target Stock Dividend or the Computed Stock Dividend minus the sum of all Aggregate Stock Dividends declared and paid for all fiscal quarters after December 31, 2017 and before the fiscal quarter for which such payment is computed, in each case subject to an amount that would, together with the Cash Distribution (as defined in the Series A Articles Supplementary), result in a 14.0% internal rate of return for the holders of Series A Preferred Stock from the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock. Accrued but unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will accumulate and will earn additional Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends as calculated above, compounded quarterly.

Accrued but unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will accumulate and will earn additional Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends as calculated above, compounded quarterly.

The holders of Series A Preferred Stock have the right to purchase their pro rata share of any qualified offering of Common Stock, which consists of any offering by the Company of Common Stock except any shares of Common Stock issued (i) in connection with a merger, consolidation, acquisition or similar business combination, (ii) in connection with a joint venture, strategic alliance or similar corporate partnering arrangement, (iii) in connection with any acquisition of assets by the Company, (iv) at market prices pursuant to a registered at-the-market program and/or (v) as part of a compensatory or employment arrangement.

As long as shares of Series A Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the Company is required to maintain a ratio of debt to total tangible assets determined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles of no more than 0.4:1, measured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Company has complied with this covenant as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the Company’s option (i) after five years from the Effective Date at a price equal to 105% of the Liquidation Value per share plus the value of all accumulated and unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends, and (ii) after six years from the Effective Date at a price equal to 100% of the Liquidation Value per share plus the value of all accumulated and unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends. In the event of certain change of control events affecting the Company prior to the third anniversary of the Effective Date, the Company must redeem all shares of Series A Preferred Stock for a price equal to (a) the Liquidation Value, plus (b) accumulated and unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends, plus (c) a make-whole premium designed to provide the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock with a return on the redeemed shares equal to a 14.0% internal rate of return through the third anniversary of the Effective Date.

Holders of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to a separate class vote with respect to (i) any amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Charter”), as supplemented by the Articles Supplementary, or bylaws that would alter or change the rights, preferences, privileges or restrictions of the Series A Preferred Stock so as to materially and adversely affect such Series A Preferred

112

Table of Contents

Stock and (ii) reclassification or otherwise, any issuances by the Company of securities that are senior to, or equal in priority with, the Series A Preferred Stock.

In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of (i) the Liquidation Value, plus all accumulated but unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends thereon to, but not including, the date of any liquidation, but excluding any Cash Premium and (ii) the amount that would be paid on such date in the event of a redemption following a change of control.

Pursuant to the Series A Articles Supplementary, the Company increased the size of its Board by one director and elected James Dondero, as representative of the Buyers, to the Board for a term expiring at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (Mr. Dondero has subsequently been reelected to the Board for a term expiring at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders). Thereafter, so long as any shares of the Series A Preferred Stock are outstanding, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, voting as a single class, are entitled to nominate and elect one individual to serve on our Board of Directors. If the Company has not paid the full amount of the Cash Distribution or the Stock Dividend on the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock for six or more quarterly dividend periods (whether or not consecutive), the Company will increase the size of the Board by two directors and the holders of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to elect two additional directors to serve on our Board of Directors until the Company pays in full all accumulated and unpaid Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends.

Further, at any time that the Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding, if Dean Jernigan, the Company’s current Executive Chairman of the Board, voluntarily leaves the position (a “Key Man Event”), the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall have the right to accept or reject the service of any person as CEO (or such person serving as the principal executive officer) of the Company.

The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have certain customary registration rights with respect to the Common Stock issued as Stock Dividends pursuant to the terms of a Registration Rights Agreement.

The issuance and sale of the Series A Preferred Stock, and the issuance of shares of common stock and/or additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock issuable as Stock Dividends, will be exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D thereunder. The Buyers represented to the Company that they are “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 501 of the Securities Act and that the Series A Preferred Stock is being acquired for investment purposes and not with a view to, or for sale in connection with, any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends will be affixed to any certificates evidencing the shares of Series A Preferred Stock or Common Stock issuable pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.

On July 25, 2018, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Purchase Agreement in order to extend the final date to issue Series A Preferred Stock under the Purchase Agreement from July 27, 2018 to September 30, 2018. On September 28, 2018, the Company issued the final $15.0 million of Series A Preferred Stock that remained available for issuance under the Purchase Agreement.

On February 28, 2018, the Company declared a (i) cash distribution of $12.12 per share of Series A Preferred Stock, payable on April 13, 2018, to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on the close of business on April 1, 2018, and (ii) distributions payable in kind in a number of shares of common stock as determined in accordance with the terms of the designation of the Series A Preferred Stock, payable on April 13, 2018, to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on the close of business on April 1, 2018.

On May 2, 2018, the Company declared a (i) cash distribution of $16.07 per share of Series A Preferred Stock, payable on July 13, 2018, to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on the close of business on July 1, 2018, and (ii) distributions payable in kind in a number of shares of common stock as determined in accordance with the terms of the designation of the Series A Preferred Stock, payable on July 13, 2018, to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on the close of business on July 1, 2018.

On July 31, 2018, the Company declared a (i) cash distribution of $15.81 per share of Series A Preferred Stock, payable on October 15, 2018, to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on the close of business on October 1, 2018, and (ii) distributions payable in kind in a number of shares of common stock as determined in accordance with the terms of the designation of the Series A Preferred Stock, payable on October 15, 2018, to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on the close of business on October 1, 2018.

On October 31, 2018, the Company declared a (i) cash distribution of $17.89 per share of Series A Preferred Stock, payable on January 15, 2019, to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on the close of business on January 1, 2019, and (ii) distributions payable in kind in a

113

Table of Contents

number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock as determined in accordance with the terms of the designation of the Series A Preferred Stock, payable on January 15, 2019, to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on the close of business on January 1, 2019.

Public Offerings of Series B Preferred Stock

On January 25, 2018, the Company filed Articles Supplementary (the “Series B Articles Supplementary”) with MSDAT designating 1,725,000 of its authorized preferred stock as 7.00% Series B cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”).

The Series B Preferred Stock ranks senior to the Company’s common stock, with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up and dissolution of the Company, and on parity with the Series A Preferred Stock and any other class or series of capital stock of the Company expressly designated as ranking on parity with the Series B Preferred Stock with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up and dissolution of the Company, junior to any class or series of capital stock of the Company expressly designated as ranking senior to the Series B Preferred Stock with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up and dissolution of the Company and junior in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future indebtedness.

Holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if authorized by the Board and declared by the Company, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends under Maryland law, cumulative cash dividends from, and including, the original issue date quarterly in arrears on the fifteenth (15th) day of January, April, July and October of each year (or if not a business day, on the immediately preceding business day) (each, a “dividend payment date”). These cumulative cash dividends will accrue on the liquidation preference amount of $25.00 per share at a rate per annum equal to 7.00% with respect to each dividend period from and including the original issue date (equivalent to an annual rate of $1.7500 per share) from the date of issuance of such Series B Preferred Stock. Dividends will be payable to holders of record as of 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the related record date. The record dates for the Series B Preferred Stock are the close of business on the first (1st) day of January, April, July or October immediately preceding the relevant dividend payment date (each, a “dividend record date”). If any dividend record date falls on any day other than a business day as defined in the Series B Articles Supplementary, the dividend record date shall be the immediately succeeding business day.

On or after January 26, 2023, the Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed, at the Company’s option, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ written notice, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, for cash at a redemption price equal to $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not authorized or declared) to, but excluding, the date fixed for redemption. Holders of Series B Preferred Stock will have no right to require the redemption or repurchase of the Series B Preferred Stock. Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in the Series B Articles Supplementary), we may redeem for cash, in whole or in part, the Series B Preferred Stock within 120 days after the date on which such Change of Control occurred, by paying $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not authorized or declared) to, but excluding, the date fixed for redemption.

Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, each holder of Series B Preferred Stock will have the right (unless, prior to the Change of Control conversion date, the company has provided or provides notice of its election to redeem, in whole or in part, the Series B Preferred Stock) to convert some or all of the Series B Preferred Stock held by such holder (the “Change of Control Conversion Right”), on the Change of Control Conversion Date (as defined below) into a number of the Company’s common stock per Series B Preferred Stock to be converted equal to the lesser of: (1) the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the sum of (x) the liquidation preference amount of $25.00 per Series B Preferred Stock, plus (y) any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not authorized or declared) to, but excluding, the Change of Control Conversion Date (unless the Change of Control Conversion Date is after a record date for a Series B Preferred Stock dividend payment for which dividends have been declared and prior to the corresponding Series B Preferred Stock dividend payment date, in which case no additional amount for such accrued and unpaid dividend will be included in this sum and such declared dividend will instead be paid, on such dividend payment date, to the holder of record of the Series B Preferred Stock to be converted as of 5:00 p.m. New York City time, on such record date) by (ii) the defined Stock Price; and (2) the 2.74876 share cap, subject to certain adjustments.

Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock generally will have no voting rights. However, if the Company is in arrears on dividends, whether or not authorized or declared, on the Series B Preferred Stock for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, holders of Series B Preferred Stock (voting together as a single class with the holders of all other classes or series of parity preferred stock (which excludes holders of Series A Preferred Stock, who are entitled to a separate class vote to elect separate Series A Preferred directors, as described above, upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable)) will be entitled to elect two additional directors at a special meeting called upon the request of the holders of at least 10% of such outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock or the holders of at least 10% of outstanding shares of any such other class or series of the Company’s parity preferred stock or at the Company’s next annual meeting and each subsequent annual meeting of stockholders, until all accrued and unpaid dividends with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock have been paid.

114

Table of Contents

Such directors will be elected by a vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock and any other series of parity equity securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable, voting together as a single class (which excludes holders of Series A Preferred Stock, who are entitled to a separate class vote to elect separate Series A Preferred directors as described above).

In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive a liquidating distribution in the amount of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not authorized or declared) to, but excluding, the date of final distribution to such holders.

On January 26, 2018, the Company received $36.0 million in proceeds, net of underwriter’s discount and offering costs, related to the issuance of 1,500,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.

In connection with the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Company, acting in its capacity as the sole managing member of the Operating Company, entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Limited Liability Company Agreement in order to provide for the issuance, and the designation of the terms and conditions, of newly classified 7.00% Series B preferred units of limited liability company interest in the Operating Company, the economic terms of which are identical to those of the Series B Preferred Stock. For more information about the Series B Preferred Stock, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2018.

Series B Preferred Stock At-the-Market Offering Program

On March 29, 2018, the Company and the Operating Company entered into a Distribution Agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”), by and among the Company, the Operating Company, the Manager and B. Riley FBR, Inc. (the “Agent”) in connection with the commencement of an at-the-market continuous offering program (the “Preferred ATM Program”). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Distribution Agreement, the Company may, from time to time, issue and sell through or to the Agent, shares of the Series B Preferred Stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $45.0 million (the “Preferred ATM Shares”).

In connection with the Preferred ATM Program, the Company filed, with MSDAT, Articles Supplementary (the “Preferred ATM Articles Supplementary”) to the Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company, designating 2,025,000 shares of its previously undesignated preferred stock as Series B Preferred Stock. The Preferred ATM Articles Supplementary increase the number of shares of the Company’s preferred stock designated as Series B Preferred Stock from 1,725,000 to 3,750,000.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has sold 71,734 shares of Series B Preferred Stock at a weighted average price of $22.94, receiving net proceeds after commissions and other offering costs of $1.4 million under the Preferred ATM Program.

The Company or the Agent may at any time suspend the offering or terminate the Distribution Agreement pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agreement. The actual sale of Preferred ATM Shares under the Program will depend on a variety of factors to be determined by the Company from time to time, including, among other things, market conditions, the trading price of the Series B Preferred Stock, capital needs and determinations by the Company of the appropriate sources of funding for the Company. The Company has no obligation to sell any of the Preferred ATM Shares, and may, at any time, suspend offers under the Distribution Agreement or terminate the Distribution Agreement.

9. DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS

The following table summarizes the Company’s dividends declared on its common stock during the year ended December 31, 2018:



Date declared	Record date	Payment date	Per share amount		Total amount
February 28, 2018	April 2, 2018	April 13, 2018	$	0.35	$	5,056
May 2, 2018	July 2, 2018	July 13, 2018		0.35		6,739
July 31, 2018	October 1, 2018	October 15, 2018		0.35		6,777
October 31, 2018	January 2, 2019	January 15, 2019		0.35		7,150

115

Table of Contents

The following table summarized the Company’s dividends declared on its Series A Preferred Stock during the year ended December 31, 2018:



Date declared	Record date	Payment date	Per share amount		Total amount
Cash dividend:
February 28, 2018	April 1, 2018	April 13, 2018	$	12.12	$	909
May 2, 2018	July 1, 2018	July 13, 2018		16.07		1,767
July 31, 2018	October 1, 2018	October 15, 2018		15.81		1,977
October 31, 2018	January 1, 2019	January 15, 2019		17.89		2,236

Stock dividend:
February 28, 2018	April 1, 2018	April 13, 2018 (1)	$	28.33	$	2,125
May 2, 2018	July 1, 2018	July 13, 2018 (2)		19.32		2,125
July 31, 2018	October 1, 2018	October 15, 2018 (3)		17.00		2,125
October 31, 2018	January 1, 2019	January 15, 2019 (4)		17.00		2,125

⁽¹⁾

120,028 shares of common stock were issued at the election of the Holders

⁽²⁾

111,199 shares of common stock were issued at the election of the Holders

⁽³⁾

109,494 shares of common stock were issued at the election of the Holders

⁽⁴⁾

2,125 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were issued at the election of the Holders

The following table summarizes the Company’s dividends declared on its Series B Preferred Stock during the year ended December 31, 2018:



Date declared	Record date	Payment date	Per share amount		Total amount
February 28, 2018	April 2, 2018	April 13, 2018	$	0.37431	$	561
May 2, 2018	July 2, 2018	July 13, 2018		0.43750		688
July 31, 2018	October 1, 2018	October 15, 2018		0.43750		688
October 31, 2018	January 2, 2019	January 15, 2019		0.43750		688

The following table summarizes the Company’s dividends declared on its common stock during the year ended December 31, 2017:



Date declared	Record date	Payment date	Per share amount		Total amount
March 7, 2017	April 3, 2017	April 14, 2017	$	0.35	$	3,149
May 3, 2017	July 3, 2017	July 14, 2017		0.35		4,983
August 1, 2017	October 2, 2017	October 13, 2017		0.35		4,983
November 1, 2017	January 2, 2018	January 12, 2018		0.35		5,051

The following table summarized the Company’s dividends declared on its Series A Preferred Stock during the year ended December 31, 2017:



Date declared	Record date	Payment date	Per share amount		Total amount
Cash dividend:
March 7, 2017	April 1, 2017	April 14, 2017	$	17.50	$	175
May 3, 2017	July 1, 2017	July 14, 2017		17.69		177
August 1, 2017	October 1, 2017	October 13, 2017		17.89		179
November 1, 2017	January 1, 2018	January 12, 2018		9.48		379

Stock dividend:
March 7, 2017	April 1, 2017	April 15, 2017 (1)	$	37.10	$	371
May 3, 2017	July 1, 2017	-		-		-
August 1, 2017	October 1, 2017	October 13, 2017 (2)		13.15		131
November 1, 2017	January 1, 2018	January 12, 2018 (3)		1.11		44

⁽¹⁾

16,497 shares of common stock were issued at the election of the Holders

⁽²⁾

6,703 shares of common stock were issued at the election of the Holders

⁽³⁾

2,222 shares of common stock were issued at the election of the Holders

116

Table of Contents

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. All outstanding unvested restricted share awards contain rights to non-forfeitable dividends and participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders and, accordingly, are considered participating securities that are included in the two-class method of computing basic earnings per share. Both the unvested restricted shares and the assumed share-settlement of the accrued stock dividend to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, and the related impacts to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis with the Company’s diluted earnings per share being the more dilutive of the treasury stock or two-class methods. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s basic earnings per share is computed using the two-class method, and the Company’s diluted earnings per share is computed using the more dilutive of the treasury stock method or two-class method:



	Year ended December 31,
Shares outstanding	2018		2017		2016
Weighted average common shares - basic		17,111,035		11,735,455		6,060,100
Effect of dilutive securities		173,125		173,057		152,548
Weighted average common shares, all classes		17,284,160		11,908,512		6,212,648

Calculation of Earnings per Share - basic
Net income	$	54,366	$	14,559	$	16,017
Less:
Net income allocated to preferred stockholders		18,014		1,456		996
Net income allocated to unvested restricted shares (1)		364		188		345
Net income attributable to common shareholders – two-class method	$	35,988	$	12,915	$	14,676

Weighted average common shares - basic		17,111,035		11,735,455		6,060,100
Earnings per share - basic	$	2.10	$	1.10	$	2.42

Calculation of Earnings per Share - diluted
Net income	$	54,366	$	14,559	$	16,017
Less:
Net income allocated to preferred stockholders		18,014		1,456		996
Net income attributable to common shareholders – two-class method	$	36,352	$	13,103	$	15,021

Weighted average common shares - diluted		17,284,160		11,908,512		6,212,648
Earnings per share - diluted	$	2.10	$	1.10	$	2.42

(1) Unvested restricted shares of common stock participate in dividends with unrestricted shares of common stock on a 1:1 basis and thus are considered participating securities under the two-class method for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Equity Method Investments

Certain of the Company’s development property investments and bridge investments are equity method investments for which the Company has elected the fair value option of accounting. The fair value of these equity method investments at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $440.2 million and $215.9 million, respectively. The interest income realized and the net unrealized gain from these equity method investments was $66.2 million, $18.0 million and $21.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company’s investment in the real estate venture, the SL1 Venture, has a carrying amount of $14.2 million and $13.9 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and the earnings from this venture were $1.5 million, $2.3 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

117

Table of Contents

Management Agreement

As of December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any employees. The Company relies on the personnel, properties and resources of the Manager to conduct its operations. The Company and the Manager are parties to a management agreement (as amended and restated, the “Management Agreement”), which was originally entered into on April 1, 2015 and was amended and restated on May 23, 2016, April 1, 2017 and November 1, 2017. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Manager is responsible for (a) the Company’s day-to-day operations (including finance, accounting and investor relations), (b) determining investment criteria and strategy in conjunction with the Company’s Board of Directors, (c) sourcing, analyzing, originating, underwriting, structuring, and acquiring the Company’s portfolio investments, (d) sourcing, analyzing, procuring and managing the Company’s capital and (e) performing portfolio management duties. The Manager has an Investment Committee that approves investments in accordance with the Company’s investment guidelines, investment strategy, and financing strategy.

The initial term of the Management Agreement will expire on March 31, 2020, with up to a maximum of three one-year extensions that end on March 31, 2023. The Company’s independent directors will review the Manager’s performance annually. At the end of the initial term and any extension term, the Management Agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the Company’s independent directors if such independent directors determine: (a) the Manager has performed its duties in an unsatisfactory manner that is materially detrimental to the Company; or (b) the compensation payable to the Manager is not fair, subject to the Manager’s right to prevent termination based on unfair compensation by accepting a reduction of compensation agreed to by at least two-thirds of the independent directors. The Company is required to provide the Manager with a minimum 180 days’ prior notice of such a termination. Upon such a termination, the Company will pay the Manager a Termination Fee except as provided below in the subsection entitled “Termination of Management Agreement”.

The Manager may terminate the Management Agreement if the Company becomes required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act, with such termination deemed to occur immediately before such event, in which case the Company would not be required to pay the Manager a Termination Fee. The Manager may also decline to renew the Management Agreement by providing the Company with 180 days’ written notice, in which case the Company would not be required to pay a Termination Fee.

Management Fees

Pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Company pays the Manager a base management fee in an amount equal to 0.375% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity (a 1.5% annual rate) calculated and payable quarterly in arrears in cash. For purposes of calculating the base management fee, the Company’s stockholder’s equity means: (a) the sum of (i) the net proceeds from all issuances of the Company’s equity securities since its IPO (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus (ii) the Company’s retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods); less (b) any amount that the Company pays to repurchase its common stock since its IPO. If the Company’s retained earnings are in a net deficit position (following any required adjustments set forth below), then retained earnings shall not be included in stockholders’ equity. Retained earnings also excludes (x) any unrealized gains and losses and other non-cash items that have impacted stockholders’ equity as reported in the Company’s financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and (y) one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP (such as a cumulative change to the Company’s operating results as a result of a codification change pursuant to GAAP), and certain non-cash items not otherwise described above (such as depreciation and amortization), in each case after discussions between the Manager and the Company’s independent directors and approval by a majority of the Company’s independent directors. As a result, the Company’s stockholders’ equity for purposes of calculating the base management fee could be greater or less than the amount of stockholders’ equity shown on its financial statements. The base management fee is payable independent of the performance of the Company’s portfolio. The Manager computes the base management fee within 30 days after the end of the fiscal quarter with respect to which such installment is payable and promptly delivers such calculation to the Company’s Board of Directors. The amount of the installment shown in the calculation is due and payable no later than the date which is five business days after the date of delivery of such computation to the Board of Directors. The base management fee was $6.7 million, $3.5 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

118

Table of Contents

Incentive Fee

Incentive Fee = .20 times (A minus (B times .08)) minus C

In the foregoing formula:

A equals the Company’s Core Earnings (as defined below) for the previous 12‑month period;

B equals (i) the weighted average of the issue price per share of the Company’s common stock of all of its public offerings of common stock, multiplied by (ii) the weighted average number of all shares of common stock outstanding (including (i) any restricted stock units and any restricted shares of common stock in the previous 12‑month period and (ii) shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding OC Units); and

C equals the sum of any incentive fees earned by the Manager with respect to the first three fiscal quarters of such previous 12‑month period.

Notwithstanding application of the incentive fee formula, any incentive fee earned shall not be paid with respect to any fiscal quarter unless cumulative annual stockholder total return for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters is greater than 8%. Any computed incentive fee earned but not paid because of the foregoing hurdle will accrue until such 8% cumulative annual stockholder total return is achieved. The total return is calculated by adding stock price appreciation (based on the volume-weighted average of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE (or other applicable trading market) for the last ten consecutive trading days of the applicable computation period minus the volume-weighted average of the closing market price of the Company’s common stock for the last ten consecutive trading days of the period immediately preceding the applicable computation period) plus dividends per share paid during such computation period, divided by the volume-weighted average of the closing market price of the Company’s common stock for the last ten consecutive trading days of the period immediately preceding the applicable computation period. For purposes of computing the Incentive Fee, “Core Earnings” is defined as (1) net income (loss) determined under GAAP, plus (2) non-cash equity compensation expense, the incentive fee, depreciation and amortization, plus (3) any unrealized losses or other non-cash expense items reflected in GAAP net income (loss), less (4) any unrealized gains reflected in GAAP net income (including any unrealized appreciation with respect to self-storage facilities that the Company has not yet acquired). The amount will be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges after discussions between the Manager and the Company’s independent directors and after approval by a majority of the independent directors. In addition, with respect to any self-storage facility acquired by the Company with respect to which it had an outstanding loan as of the time of such acquisition, the amount of Core Earnings determined pursuant to the formula above in the period of such acquisition shall also be increased by the difference between (A) the appraised value, as determined by a nationally recognized, independent third-party appraiser, mutually agreed to by the Company and the Manager, who has significant expertise in valuing self-storage properties, and (B) (i) the outstanding principal amount of any one of the Company’s loans secured by such acquired self-storage facility at the time of such acquisition plus (ii) any other consideration given to the former owner upon such acquisition. This addition is intended to include in Core Earnings the amount of the Company’s unrealized gain on account of its acquisition of a self-storage facility without such facility being sold to a third party buyer in the open market.

The Manager computes the incentive fee each quarter within 45 days after the end of the fiscal quarter that is currently payable and if an incentive fee results, promptly delivers such calculation to the Company’s Board of Directors. The amount of any incentive fee shown in the calculation is due and payable no later than the date which is five business days after the date of delivery of such computation to the Board of Directors. The incentive fee earned for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $0.7 million, is primarily due to the purchases of developer interests in six self-storage projects during the year, and is presented in the Fees to Manager line item in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. No incentive fee was earned for any quarter in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had outstanding fees due to Manager of $3.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, consisting of the management fees payable, incentive fees payable, and certain reimbursable expenses.

119

Table of Contents

Expense Reimbursement

In addition to Management Fees and Incentive Fees as described above, the Management Agreement provides that the Company will reimburse payroll, occupancy, business development, marketing and other expenses of the Manager for conducting the business of the Company, excluding the salaries and cash bonuses of the Manager’s CEO and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and certain other costs as determined by the Manager in accordance with the Management Agreement. Certain prepaid expenses and fixed assets are also purchased through the Manager and reimbursed by the Company. Under the Management Agreement, the Manager may engage independent contractors that provide investment banking, securities brokerage, mortgage brokerage and other financial, legal and account services as may be required for the Company’s investments, and the Company agrees to reimburse the Manager for costs and expenses incurred in connection with these services; however, expenses incurred by the Manager are reimbursable to the Manager by the Company only to the extent such expenses are not otherwise directly reimbursed by an unaffiliated third party. The amount of expenses to be reimbursed to the Manager by the Company are reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of any such payment or reimbursement. Amounts reimbursable to the Manager for expenses are included in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and totaled $3.8 million, $3.0 million and $3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Termination of Management Agreement

In the event that the Company terminates the Management Agreement per the terms of the agreement, other than for cause or the Company being required to register as an investment company, there will be a Termination Fee due to the Manager. If the Management Agreement terminates other than for Cause, voluntary non-renewal by the Manager or the Company being required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act, then the Company shall pay to the Manager, on the date on which such termination is effective, a Termination Fee equal to the greater of (i) three times the sum of the average annual Base Management Fee and Incentive Fee earned by the Manager during the 24‑month period prior to such termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination, or (ii) a price, based on the lesser of (a) the Manager’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (adjusted for unusual, extraordinary and non-recurring charges and expenses), or “EBITDA”, annualized based on the most recent quarter ended, multiplied by a specific multiple, or EBITDA Multiple, depending on our achieved total annual return, and (b) the Company’s equity market capitalization multiplied by a specific percentage, or Capitalization Percentage, depending on our achieved total return (the “Internalization Price”).

The EBITDA and Capitalization Percentage are as follows based on our total annual return:


Total Annual Return	EBITDA Multiple	Capitalization %
<8%	5x	5%
8% to 12%	5.5x	5.5%
>12%	6x	6%

Any Termination Fee will be payable by the Operating Company in cash.

The Company also may terminate the Management Agreement at any time, including during the initial term, without the payment of any Termination Fee, with 30 days’ prior written notice from the Board of Directors, for cause. “Cause” is defined as: (i) the Manager’s continued breach of any material provision of the Management Agreement following a prescribed period; (ii) the occurrence of certain events with respect to the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Manager; (iii) a change of control of the Manager that a majority of the Company’s independent directors determines is materially detrimental to the Company; (iv) the Manager committing fraud against the Company, misappropriating or embezzling our funds, or acting grossly negligent in the performance of its duties under the Management Agreement; (v) the dissolution of the Manager; (vi) the Manager fails to provide adequate or appropriate personnel that are reasonably necessary for the Manager to identify investment opportunities for the Company and to manage and develop the Company’s investment portfolio if such default continues uncured for a period of 60 days after written notice thereof, which notice must contain a request that the same be remedied; (vii) the Manager is convicted (including a plea of nolo contendere) of a felony; or (viii) both the current Executive Chairman and the current CEO are no longer senior executive officers of the Manager or the Company during the term of the Management Agreement other than by reason of death or disability.

Internalization of Manager

No later than 180 days prior to the end of the initial term of the Management Agreement, the Manager will offer to contribute to the Operating Company at the end of the initial term all of the assets or equity interests in the Manager (an “Internalization Transaction”). Such offer shall specify an internalization price and such terms and conditions as the Manager shall determine.

120

Table of Contents

Upon receipt of the Manager’s initial internalization offer, a special committee consisting solely of the Company’s independent directors may accept the Manager’s proposal or submit a counter offer to the Manager. If the Manager and the special committee are unable to agree, the Manager and the special committee will repeat this process annually during the term of any extension of the Management Agreement. Acquisition of the Manager pursuant to this process requires a fairness opinion from a nationally recognized investment banking firm and stockholder approval, in addition to approval by the special committee. As described above, if an Internalization Transaction has not occurred prior to March 31, 2023, the last day of the last renewal term, then the Manager and the Company shall consummate an Internalization Transaction to be effective as of that date, and such Internalization Transaction shall not require a fairness opinion, the approval of a special committee of the Company’s Board of Directors or the approval of the Company’s stockholders.

Under the Management Agreement, if an Internalization Transaction has not occurred prior to March 31, 2023, the last day of the last renewal term, then the Manager and the Company shall consummate an Internalization Transaction to be effective as of that date and all assets of the Manager (or, alternatively, all of the equity interests in the Manager) shall be conveyed to and acquired by the Operating Company in exchange for the Internalization Price (as described herein). At such time, all employees of the Manager shall become employees of the Operating Company and the Manager shall discontinue all business activities. Unlike an Internalization Transaction that occurs prior to the end of the final renewal term of the Management Agreement, an Internalization Transaction that occurs at the end of the final renewal term shall not require a fairness opinion, the approval of a special committee of the Company’s Board of Directors or the approval of the Company’s stockholders.

The “Internalization Price” payable in the event of an Internalization Transaction at the end of the last renewal term shall be equal to the Termination Fee and the Company’s Board of Directors has no discretion to change such Internalization Price or the conditions applicable to its payment.

The Internalization Price paid to the Manager in any Internalization Transaction will be payable by the Operating Company in the number of units of limited liability company interests (“OC Units”) of the Operating Company equal to the Internalization Price, divided by the volume-weighted average of the Company’s closing market price of the common stock for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date with respect to which value must be determined. However, if the Company’s common stock is not traded on a national securities exchange at the time of closing of any Internalization Transaction, then the number of OC Units shall be determined by agreement between the Company’s Board of Directors and the Manager or, in the absence of such agreement, the Internalization Price shall be paid in cash.

12. RESTRUCTURING COSTS

On August 11, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved consolidating its offices and moving the corporate headquarters to Memphis, Tennessee. In connection with the consolidation and moving of the Company’s headquarters, the Company added legal, accounting, loan administration and business development personnel in Memphis and closed its offices in Miami, Florida and Cleveland, Ohio. The consolidation was completed by the end of the third quarter of 2015.

Restructuring costs reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations relate primarily to one-time termination benefits and lease termination costs. The Company recognizes these severance and other charges when the requirements of ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, have been met regarding a plan of termination and when communication has been made to employees. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred no restructuring costs. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred $54,000 in restructuring costs in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.



	Year ended December 31, 2018
											Total cumulative
											restructuring costs
	Restructuring								Restructuring		incurred or
	costs liability at		Restructuring		Cash		Non-cash		costs liability at		expected to be
Cost Type	December 31, 2017		costs incurred		payments		activity		December 31, 2018		incurred
Severance	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	97
Fixed asset disposal		-		-		-		-		-		33
Lease termination		36		-		(36)		-		-		187
Other		-		-		-		-		-		13
Total restructuring costs	$	36	$	-	$	(36)	$	-	$	-	$	330

121

Table of Contents



	Year ended December 31, 2017
											Total cumulative
											restructuring costs
	Restructuring								Restructuring		incurred or
	costs liability at		Restructuring		Cash		Non-cash		costs liability at		expected to be
Cost Type	December 31, 2016		costs incurred		payments		activity		December 31, 2017		incurred
Severance	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	97
Fixed asset disposal		-		-		-		-		-		33
Lease termination		79		-		(43)		-		36		187
Other		-		-		-		-		-		13
Total restructuring costs	$	79	$	-	$	(43)	$	-	$	36	$	330



	Year ended December 31, 2016
											Total cumulative
											restructuring costs
	Restructuring								Restructuring		incurred or
	costs liability at		Restructuring		Cash		Non-cash		costs liability at		expected to be
Cost Type	December 31, 2015		costs incurred		payments		activity		December 31, 2016		incurred
Severance	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	97
Fixed asset disposal		-		-		-		-		-		33
Lease termination		85		64		(70)		-		79		187
Other		10		-		-		(10)		-		13
Total restructuring costs	$	95	$	64	$	(70)	$	(10)	$	79	$	330

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

As described in Note 3, Self-Storage Investment Portfolio, the Company has $220.9 million of unfunded loan commitments related to its investment portfolio. As described in Note 5, Investment in Real Estate Venture, the Company has $0.9 million of unfunded loan commitments to the SL1 Venture. As described in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, the Company has $2.2 million of unfunded loan commitments related to seven revolving loan agreements.

The following table summarizes the maturities of the Company’s FirstBank Term Loans as of December 31, 2018:



Contractual Obligations	2019		2020		2021		2022		2023		Thereafter		Total
Long-term debt obligations (1)(2)(3)	$	-	$	-	$	24,900	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	24,900

⁽¹⁾

Represents principal payments gross of discounts and debt issuance costs.

⁽²⁾

Amount excludes interest, which is variable based on 30‑day LIBOR plus a spread of 2.25%.

⁽³⁾

Does not reflect any borrowings under the Company’s Credit Facility as there were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2018. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of December 28, 2021, with two one-year extension options to extend the maturity date to December 28, 2023.

The Company from time to time may be party to litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of business. The Company is not aware of any legal claims that could materially impact its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

122

Table of Contents

14. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following table summarizes the Company’s quarterly financial results for each quarter of the year ended December 31, 2018:



	For the three month period ended,
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
2018:
Total revenues	$	5,216	$	7,241	$	9,091	$	9,666
Net income	$	5,354	$	10,797	$	15,964	$	22,251
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	1,759	$	6,217	$	11,174	$	17,202
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.12	$	0.40	$	0.58	$	0.87
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.12	$	0.40	$	0.57	$	0.87

The following table summarizes the Company’s quarterly financial results for each quarter of the year ended December 31, 2017:



	For the three month period ended,
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
2017:
Total revenue	$	2,301	$	2,599	$	3,361	$	3,930
Net income	$	1,783	$	5,194	$	4,457	$	3,125
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	1,237	$	5,017	$	4,147	$	2,702
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.14	$	0.50	$	0.29	$	0.19
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.14	$	0.50	$	0.29	$	0.19

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company’s management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements included herein. Other than those disclosed below, there have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that require disclosure or recognition in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Investment Activity

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, the Company closed on the following development property investment with a Profits Interest:



		Total Investment
Closing Date	MSA	Commitment
3/1/2019	New York City 6	$	18,796
	Total	$	18,796

Capital Activities

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had no borrowings under the Credit Facility. As of February 28, 2019, the Company has $21.0 million outstanding of $118.0 million in total availability under the Credit Facility.

123

Table of Contents

On January 18, 2019, one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement with respect to a term loan with a principal amount of $9.2 million. This loan is secured by a first mortgage on the Company’s wholly-owned self-storage facility located in Charlotte, North Carolina. As a condition to the lender providing the loan, the Company has agreed to unconditionally guarantee the subsidiary’s obligations under the loan pursuant to guaranty agreements with the lender.

First Quarter Dividend Declarations

On February 22, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and a distribution payable in kind, if applicable, in a number of shares of common stock or Series A Preferred Stock as determined in accordance with the election of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock for the quarter ending March 31, 2019. The dividends are payable on April 15, 2019 to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of record on April 1, 2019.

On February 22, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on the Series B Preferred Stock in the amount of $0.4375 per share for the quarter ending March 31, 2019. The dividends are payable on April 15, 2019 to holders of Series B Preferred Stock of record on April 1, 2019.

On February 22, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.35 per share of common stock for the quarter ending March 31, 2019. The dividend is payable on April 15, 2019 to stockholders of record on April 1, 2019.

124

Table of Contents

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2018

(Dollars in thousands)



						Gross Carrying Amount at
			Initial Cost			December 31, 2018
	Square			Buildings and	Costs Subsequent		Buildings and		Accumulated	Year
Description	Footage	Debt	Land	Improvements	to Acquisition	Land	Improvements	Total	Depreciation (1)	Acquired
Ocoee, FL	93,965	9,150	1,505	14,322	1	1,505	14,323	15,828	1,177	2017
Marietta, GA	66,187	7,125	1,500	10,166	3	1,500	10,169	11,669	645	2018
Alpharetta, GA	71,718	8,625	3,407	9,764	3	3,407	9,767	13,174	659	2018
Fleming Island, FL	59,848	-	1,438	10,195	5	1,438	10,200	11,638	835	2018
Pittsburgh, PA	47,794	-	316	8,609	671	316	9,280	9,596	274	2018
Mallard Creek, NC	85,350	-	1,445	11,301	-	1,445	11,301	12,746	267	2018
Bay Shore, NY	105,347	-	1,186	24,262	-	1,186	24,262	25,448	40	2018

⁽¹⁾

The costs of building and improvements are generally depreciated using the straight-line method based on a useful life of 40 years.



		December 31, 2018
Self-storage real estate owned:
Balance at beginning of period	$	15,827
Acquisitions & improvements		83,602
Construction in progress		670
Balance at end of period	$	100,099

Accumulated Depreciation:
Balance at beginning of period	$	472
Depreciation expense		3,425
Dispositions and other		-
Balance at end of period	$	3,897

125

Table of Contents

JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

Schedule IV

Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

December 31, 2018

(Dollars in thousands)



Column A		Column B			Column C	Column D	Column E		Column F		Column G		Column H
													Principal Amount
						Periodic			Face		Carrying		of Loans Subject
		Interest			Final Maturity	Payment			Amount of		Amount of		to Delinquent
Description	Location (6)	Rate			Date	Terms	Prior Liens		Loans		Loans (1)		Principal or Interest
Development property investments:
Development investments with a profits interest
Self-storage development project	Milwaukee		6.90	%	1-Aug-21	(2)(8)		-		7,648		9,057		-
Self-storage development project	New Haven		6.90	%	1-Sep-21	(2)(9)		-		6,827		8,350		-
Self-storage development project	Raleigh		6.90	%	1-Sep-21	(2)(8)		-		8,498		8,002		-
Self-storage development project	Austin		6.90	%	27-Oct-21	(2)(8)		-		7,817		7,763		-
Self-storage development project	Charlotte		6.90	%	20-Sep-22	(2)(8)		-		11,445		12,793		-
Self-storage development project	Jacksonville		6.90	%	17-Nov-22	(3)(8)		-		7,157		9,122		-
Self-storage development project	Atlanta		6.90	%	1-Feb-23	(3)(8)		-		8,711		9,337		-
Self-storage development project	Atlanta		6.90	%	1-Feb-23	(3)(8)		-		12,957		16,031		-
Self-storage development project	Orlando		6.90	%	24-Feb-23	(3)(8)		-		7,229		8,592		-
Self-storage development project	New Orleans		6.90	%	24-Feb-23	(3)(8)		-		10,587		12,221		-
Self-storage development project	Atlanta		6.90	%	27-Feb-23	(3)(8)		-		14,095		15,371		-
Self-storage development project	Fort Lauderdale		6.90	%	28-Feb-23	(3)(8)		-		7,604		10,475		-
Self-storage development project	Houston		6.90	%	28-Feb-23	(3)(8)		-		10,936		13,285		-
Self-storage development project	Louisville		6.90	%	14-Apr-23	(3)(8)		-		6,979		8,540		-
Self-storage development project	Denver		6.90	%	20-Apr-23	(3)(8)		-		6,884		7,706		-
Self-storage development project	Denver		6.90	%	20-Apr-23	(3)(8)		-		10,235		12,403		-
Self-storage development project	Atlanta		6.90	%	1-Jun-23	(3)(8)		-		10,589		12,774		-
Self-storage development project	Tampa		6.90	%	1-Jun-23	(3)(8)		-		5,493		6,020		-
Self-storage development project	Tampa		6.90	%	1-Jun-23	(3)(8)		-		7,154		8,391		-
Self-storage development project	Tampa		6.90	%	1-Jul-23	(3)(8)		-		8,846		11,419		-
Self-storage development project	Baltimore		9.50	%	1-Jul-23	(3)(5)(8)		-		9,177		10,805		-
Self-storage development project	Knoxville		6.90	%	28-Jun-23	(3)(8)		-		7,717		8,652		-
Self-storage development project	New York City		9.50	%	1-Jul-23	(4)(5)(8)		-		24,760		28,102		-
Self-storage development project	Jacksonville		6.90	%	27-Jul-23	(3)(8)		-		6,836		8,251		-
Self-storage development project	Orlando		6.90	%	1-Sep-23	(3)(8)		-		6,769		8,264		-

126

Table of Contents

Self-storage development project	Los Angeles	6.90	%	30-Sep-24	(12)(14)		-		8,692		8,418		-
Self-storage development project	Miami	6.90	%	14-Sep-23	(3)(8)		-		6,882		6,562		-
Self-storage development project	Louisville	6.90	%	30-Sep-23	(3)(8)		-		8,691		10,652		-
Self-storage development project	Miami	9.50	%	1-Nov-23	(3)(5)(8)		-		1,335		1,082		-
Self-storage development project	New York City	9.50	%	1-Nov-23	(3)(5)(8)		-		4,835		4,383		-
Self-storage development project	Miami	9.50	%	1-Dec-23	(3)(5)(8)		-		4,096		3,542		-
Self-storage development project	Minneapolis	6.90	%	21-Nov-23	(3)(8)		-		3,214		3,070		-
Self-storage development project	Boston	6.90	%	1-Jan-24	(3)(8)		-		3,978		4,246		-
Self-storage development project	New York City	6.90	%	15-Dec-23	(3)(8)		-		1,777		1,631		-
Self-storage development project	Boston	6.90	%	27-Dec-23	(3)(11)		-		2,563		2,402		-
Self-storage development project	New York City	6.90	%	1-Jan-24	(8)(14)		-		6,523		6,400		-
Self-storage development project	Minneapolis	6.90	%	8-Feb-24	(3)(8)		-		7,802		8,773		-
Self-storage development project	Philadelphia	9.50	%	1-Apr-24	(3)(5)(8)		-		7,870		8,093		-
Self-storage development project	Minneapolis	6.90	%	6-Apr-24	(3)(8)		-		2,333		2,206		-
Self-storage development project	Miami	9.50	%	1-Jun-24	(3)(5)(8)		-		2,803		2,564		-
Self-storage development project	Atlanta	6.90	%	1-Jun-24	(3)(8)		-		861		775		-
Self-storage development project	Kansas City	6.90	%	1-Jun-24	(3)(8)		-		1,228		1,137		-
Self-storage development project	Orlando	6.90	%	7-Jun-24	(3)(8)		-		800		673		-
Self-storage development project	Baltimore	6.90	%	16-Nov-24	(3)(7)		-		390		301		-

						$	-	$	309,623	$	348,636	$	-

Construction loans - first mortgages
Self-storage development project	Miami	12.90	%	30-Jun-18	(13)(15)		-		17,733		17,733		17,733
						$	-	$	17,733	$	17,733	$	17,733
Bridge investments
Self-storage property	Miami	6.90	%	1-Apr-23	(10)		-		20,201		22,823		-
Self-storage property	Miami	9.50	%	1-Apr-23	(5)(10)		-		16,883		14,432		-
Self-storage property	Miami	6.90	%	1-Apr-23	(10)		-		13,370		17,372		-
Self-storage property	Miami	9.50	%	1-Apr-23	(5)(10)		-		17,581		15,971		-
Self-storage property	Miami	6.90	%	1-Apr-23	(10)		-		13,472		13,785		-
						$	-	$	81,507	$	84,383	$	-

						$	-	$	408,863	$	450,752	$	17,733

⁽¹⁾

The face amount of loans in Column F approximate the aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes.

⁽²⁾

Development property investments with a Profits Interest are comprised of a construction loan secured by a first mortgage on the development project and a mezzanine loan secured by a first priority security interest in the membership interests of the owners of the project. These loans are entered into simultaneously and are valued as a single instrument for accounting purposes.

⁽³⁾

Development property investments with a Profits Interest are comprised of a construction loan secured by a first mortgage on the development project.

127

Table of Contents

⁽⁴⁾

Development property investments with a Profits Interest are comprised of a construction lending facility secured by a first mortgage on the development project. This project is located in New York state, and in order to comply with the New York lien law, our typical investment commitment amount was divided into three tranches with three individual promissory notes, each secured by the first mortgage on the development project. The first note is comprised of land costs only, the second is comprised of construction hard costs only, and the third is comprised of all the remaining costs in the project, with the total amount of all three notes equaling our total investment commitment amount.

⁽⁵⁾

For this investment, interest accrues at a rate of 9.5% per annum, with 6.5% payable monthly from interest reserves and the remaining 3.0% accruing but not payable until the loan matures or is paid off.

⁽⁶⁾

Represents the MSA of the development project.

⁽⁷⁾

⁽⁸⁾

Interest only monthly (funded from interest reserve until the project is generating positive cash flows, in which case, all or a portion of the interest is paid in cash); balloon payment due at maturity; prepayment penalty - On or before 37th month - no prepayment permitted; on or after 37th month but prior to 49th month, 3%; on or after 49th month but prior to 61st month, 2%; on or after 61st month but prior to 70th month, 1%; on or after 70th month - no prepayment premium.

⁽⁹⁾

Interest only monthly (funded from interest reserve until the project is generating positive cash flows, in which case, all or a portion of the interest is paid in cash); balloon payment due at maturity; prepayment penalty – Prior to completion date – no prepayment permitted; prior to 19th month following completion - no prepayment premium; on or after 19th month but prior to 31st month following completion, 3%; on or after 31st month but prior to 43rd month following completion, 2%; on or after 43rd month but prior to 55th month following completion, 1%; on or after 55th month following completion - no prepayment premium.

⁽¹⁰⁾

Interest only monthly (funded from interest reserve until the project is generating positive cash flows, in which case, all or a portion of the interest is paid in cash); balloon payment due at maturity; prepayment penalty – Prior to completion date – no prepayment permitted; prior to 19th month following completion - no prepayment premium; on or after 18th month but prior to 30th month following completion, 2%; on or after 30th month but prior to 42nd month following completion, 1%; on or after 43rd month following completion - no prepayment premium.

⁽¹¹⁾

Interest only monthly (funded from interest reserve); balloon payment due at maturity; prepayment penalty - On or before 37th month, 4%; on or after 37th month but prior to 49th month, 3%; on or after 49th month but prior to 61st month, 2%; on or after 61st month but prior to 67th month, 1%; on or after 67th month - no prepayment premium.

⁽¹²⁾

Interest only monthly (funded from interest reserve); balloon payment due at maturity; prepayment penalty - On or before 37th month - no prepayment permitted; on or after 37th month but prior to 49th month, 2%; on or after 49th month but prior to 70th month, 1%; on or after 70th month - no prepayment premium.

⁽¹³⁾

Interest only monthly (funded from interest reserve); balloon payment due at maturity; no prepayment permitted for all or any portion of the loan prior to completion of construction and receipt of certificate of occupancy.

⁽¹⁴⁾

This development property investment with a Profits Interest is a mezzanine loan secured by a first priority security interest in the membership interest of the developer partner of the project.

⁽¹⁵⁾

This construction loan had an initial term of 18 months that was extended during the first quarter of 2017 and in 2018. This loan matured and became due and payable on June 30, 2018; however, it has yet to be repaid. Accordingly, this construction loan is in default and was placed on non-accrual status during the three months ended December 31, 2018. Since that time, no interest income has been recognized and will only be recognized if interest is collected in cash. The following table sets forth the activity of mortgage loans for the year ended December 31, 2018.

128

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the activity of mortgage loans for the year ended December 31, 2018:



Balance as of December 31, 2017	$	234,171
Fundings of principal, net of unamortized origination fees		253,030
Reclassification of self-storage real estate owned		(66,390)
Payment-in-kind interest		22,641
Repayments of principal		(33,047)
Profits interest fair value on Boston 1		(2,614)
Net unrealized gains		42,961
Balance as of December 31, 2018	$	450,752

129

Table of Contents

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10‑K. The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), such as this annual report on Form 10‑K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on the controls evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10‑K, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and that material information related to our company and our consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a‑15(f) and 15d‑15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 based on the 2013 framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Not applicable

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item will be contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2019 Annual Stockholders Meeting, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference.

130

Table of Contents

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

131

Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Documents filed as part of the report

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements of the Company, together with the independent registered public accounting firm’s report thereon, are included herein and are incorporated by reference. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, filed herewith, for a list of financial statements.

(2) Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2018

Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate as of December 31, 2018

Schedule III and IV are included herein and are incorporated by reference. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, filed herewith. All other financial statement schedules have been omitted because the required information is not applicable or deemed not material, or the required information is presented in the consolidated financial statements and/or in the notes to consolidated financial statements filed in response to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

(3) Exhibits:

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference, are filed or furnished as part of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

ITEM 16. 10‑K SUMMARY

The Company has elected not to include a summary.

132

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Jernigan Capital, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Form S-11, as amended (Registration No. 333-202219), filed on March 20, 2015)
3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Jernigan Capital, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Form S-11, as amended (Registration No. 333-202219), filed on March 20, 2015)
3.3		Articles Supplementary of Jernigan Capital, Inc. Designating the Rights and Preferences of the Series A Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2016)
3.4		Amendment No. 1 to Articles Supplementary of Jernigan Capital, Inc. Designating the Rights and Preferences of the Series A Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2018)
3.5		Articles Supplementary of Jernigan Capital, Inc. Designating the Rights and Preferences of the 7.00% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2018)
3.6		Articles Supplementary of Jernigan Capital, Inc. Designating the Rights and Preferences of the 7.00% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock with respect to the designation of additional shares of 7.00% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 29, 2018)
4.1		Form of Certification for Common Stock of Jernigan Capital, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Form S-11, as amended (Registration No. 333-202219), filed on March 13, 2015)
10.1		Limited Liability Company Agreement of Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 5, 2016)
10.2†		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Form S-11, as amended (Registration No. 333-202219), filed on March 13, 2015)
10.3		Indemnification Agreement between Jernigan Capital, Inc. and each of its directors and officers listed on Schedule A thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)
10.4†		Restricted Stock Agreement with John A. Good (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 16, 2015)
10.5		Indemnification Agreement with John A. Good (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 16, 2015)
10.6		Limited Liability Company Agreement of Storage Lenders LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 11, 2016)
10.7		Amended and Restated Management Agreement between Jernigan Capital, Inc., Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC and JCAP Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 23, 2016)
10.8		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2016, by and between Jernigan Capital, Inc. and certain funds managed or advised by Highland Capital Management, L.P. or its controlled affiliates (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2016)
10.9		Amendment No. 1 to Limited Liability Company Agreement of Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, dated July 27, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2016)
10.10		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2016, by and between Jernigan Capital, Inc. and certain funds managed or advised by Highland Capital Management, L.P. or its controlled affiliates (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2016)
10.11		Indemnification Agreement with James D. Dondero (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 8, 2016)
10.12		Indemnification Agreement with Kelly P. Luttrell (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 3, 2017)
10.13†		Restricted Stock Agreement with Kelly P. Luttrell (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 3, 2017)
10.14		Jernigan Capital, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-217637), filed on May 3, 2017)

133

Table of Contents

Exhibit Number		Description
10.15		Second Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2017, by and among Jernigan Capital, Inc., Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC and JCAP Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 9, 2017)
10.16		Third Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2018, by and among Jernigan Capital, Inc., Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC and JCAP Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017)
10.17		Amendment No. 2 to Limited Liability Company Agreement of Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, dated January 25, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2018)
10.18		Amendment No. 3 to Limited Liability Company Agreement of Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, dated March 29, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on March 29, 2018)
10.19*		Indemnification Agreement with Jonathan L. Perry, dated as of June 4, 2018
10.20		Amendment No. 1 to the Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 25, 2018 by and between Jernigan Capital, Inc. and certain funds managed or advised by Highland Capital Management, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 2, 2018)
10.21		Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement dated as of January 16, 2018 by and among Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., as joint lead arranger, Raymond James Bank, N.A., as joint lead arranger and syndication agent, and the other lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 2, 2018)
10.22		Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2018, by and between McGinnis Ferry Owner, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 22, 2018)
10.23		Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2018, by and between Franklin Owner, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 22, 2018)
10.24		Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2018, by and between Storage Builders II, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 22, 2018)
10.25*		First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated as of August 17, 2018 by and between McGinnis Ferry Owner, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender
10.26*		First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated as of August 17, 2018 by and between Franklin Owner, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender
10.27*		First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated as of August 17, 2018 by and between Storage Builders II, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender
10.28*		Second Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 18, 2019 between McGinnis Ferry Owner, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender
10.29*		Second Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 18, 2019 between Franklin Owner, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender
10.30*		Second Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 18, 2019 between Storage Builders II, LLC, as borrower, and FirstBank, as lender
10.31		Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2018, by and between Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, and its subsidiary party thereto, in favor of FirstBank (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 22, 2018)
10.32		Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2018, by and between Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, and its subsidiary party thereto, in favor of FirstBank (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 22, 2018)
10.33		Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2018, by and between Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, and its subsidiary party thereto, in favor of FirstBank (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 22, 2018)

134

Table of Contents

Exhibit Number		Description
10.34		Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2018 by and among Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., as joint lead arranger, Raymond James Bank, N.A., as joint lead arranger and syndication agent, and the other lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 2, 2018)
10.35*		Indemnification Agreement with Randall L. Churchey, dated as of December 6, 2018
10.36*		Indemnification Agreement with Rebecca Owen, dated as of December 6, 2018
10.37		Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 28, 2018, by and among Jernigan Capital Operating Company, LLC, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Raymond James Bank, N.A. and BMO Capital Markets Corp., as joint lead arrangers and syndication agents, and the other lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 2, 2019)
10.38		Amended and Restated Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance, dated as of December 28, 2018, by and among the Jernigan Capital, Inc. and its subsidiaries party there to, in favor of KeyBank National Association and the other lenders under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Jernigan Capital, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 2, 2019)
21.1*		Subsidiaries of Registrant
23.1*		Consent of Grant Thornton LLP
23.2*		Consent of Frazee Ivy Davis, PLC regarding consolidated financial statements of Franklin Parent, LLC
23.3*		Consent of Frazee Ivy Davis, PLC regarding financial statements of LR-Bayshore 1, LLC
31.1*		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2*		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1*		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
99.1*		Consolidated Financial Statements of Franklin Parent, LLC and Subsidiary as of February 2, 2018 (unaudited), December 31, 2017 (unaudited), and December 31, 2016 (audited)
99.2*		Financial Statements of LR-Bayshore 1, LLC as of December 21, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017 (audited)
101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase
101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

*Filed herewith.

†Denotes management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement

135

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC.

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ JOHN A. GOOD
			John A. Good
			Chief Executive Officer

136

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ JOHN A. GOOD
			John A. Good
			Chief Executive Officer
			(principal executive officer)

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ KELLY P. LUTTRELL
			Kelly P. Luttrell
			Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate
			Secretary and Treasurer
			(principal financial and accounting officer)

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ RANDALL L. CHURCHEY
			Randall L. Churchey
			Director

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ MARK O. DECKER
			Mark O. Decker
			Director

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ JAMES D. DONDERO
			James D. Dondero
			Director

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ DEAN JERNIGAN
			Dean Jernigan
			Executive Chairman of the Board

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ REBECCA OWEN
			Rebecca Owen
			Director

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ HOWARD A. SILVER
			Howard A. Silver
			Director

Date:	March 1, 2019	By:	/s/ HARRY J. THIE
			Harry J. Thie
			Director

137