S-1 1 ds1.htm FORM S-1 Form S-1
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2010

Registration No. 333-          

 

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

VERA BRADLEY, INC.

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Indiana

 

3171

 

27-2935063

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

2208 Production Road

Fort Wayne, Indiana 46808

Phone: (877) 708-8372

 

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,

of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Michael C. Ray

Chief Executive Officer

Vera Bradley, Inc.

2208 Production Road

Fort Wayne, Indiana 46808

Phone: (877) 708-8372

 

 

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,

including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

 

Steven J. Gavin, Esq.

Arlene K. Lim, Esq.

Winston & Strawn LLP

35 West Wacker Drive

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Phone: (312) 558-5600

Fax: (312) 558-5700

 

Patrick Daugherty, Esq.

Foley & Lardner LLP

321 North Clark Street

Chicago, Illinois 60654

Phone: (312) 832-4500

Fax: (312) 832-4700

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:

As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box:   ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:   ¨

If this Form is to be a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:   ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filed, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  ¨

   Accelerated filer   ¨    Non-accelerated filer   þ    Smaller reporting company   ¨

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 
Title of each class of securities to be registered    Proposed maximum aggregate
offering price(1)
   Amount of
registration fee

Common stock, without par value

   $175,000,000.00    $12,477.50
 
 
(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933.

 

 

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

Subject to Completion, Dated July 1, 2010

PROSPECTUS

LOGO

Vera Bradley, Inc.

             Shares of Common Stock

We are selling              shares of common stock and the selling shareholders are selling              shares of common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the shares of common stock sold by the selling shareholders.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price of our common stock is expected to be between $             and $             per share. We have applied to list our common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “            ”.

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 8 for a description of various risks you should consider in evaluating an investment in the shares.

 

     Per Share    Total

Initial public offering price

   $                 $             

Underwriting discount

   $      $  

Proceeds, before expenses, to us

   $      $  

Proceeds, before expenses, to selling shareholders

   $      $  

The underwriters have a 30-day option to purchase up to              additional shares from certain selling shareholders on the same terms set forth above to cover over-allotments, if any.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of our common stock to purchasers on or about                     , 2010.

 

 

Baird

                    , 2010


Table of Contents

LOGO


Table of Contents

LOGO


Table of Contents

LOGO

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Prospectus Summary

   1

Risk Factors

   8

Forward-Looking Statements

   19

Use of Proceeds

   20

Dividend Policy

   20

Capitalization

   21

Dilution

   22

Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data

   24

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   26

Business

   42

Management

   54

Executive Compensation

   58

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

   69

Principal and Selling Shareholders

   71

Description of Capital Stock

   73

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

   78

Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders

   80

Underwriting

   83

Legal Matters

   86

Experts

   86

Where You Can Find Additional Information

   86

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-1

 

 

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information in this prospectus is current as of the date such information is presented. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates.

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA AND FORECASTS

This prospectus includes estimates of market share and industry data and forecasts that we obtained from industry publications and surveys. Industry publications and surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there can be no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of included information. We have not independently verified any of the data from third party sources, nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

In January 2008, we changed our fiscal year end from December 31 to the Saturday closest to January 31. Accordingly, references in this prospectus to fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 refer to the years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively, and references to calendar years 2007, 2006 and 2005 refer to the years ended December 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Certain differences in the numbers in the tables and text throughout this prospectus may exist due to rounding.


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained in this prospectus, before making an investment in shares of our common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this prospectus assumes (1) completion of the reorganization transaction (as defined below) and (2) that the underwriters will not exercise their over-allotment option to purchase an additional              shares.

We are a newly-formed Indiana corporation that has not, to date, conducted any activities other than those incident to our formation and the preparation of this prospectus. We were formed solely for the purpose of reorganizing the corporate structure of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. We expect the shareholders of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. will contribute all of their equity interests in that corporation to us in return for shares of our common stock. As a result, Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. will become our wholly-owned subsidiary. We refer to the foregoing as our reorganization transaction. As used in this prospectus, except where the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated, the terms “company,” “Vera Bradley,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. and its subsidiaries before the reorganization transaction, and Vera Bradley, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Vera Bradley Designs, Inc., after the reorganization transaction.

Our Company

Vera Bradley is a leading designer, producer, marketer and retailer of stylish and highly-functional accessories for women. Our products include a wide offering of handbags, accessories and travel and leisure items. Over our 28-year history, Vera Bradley has become a true lifestyle brand that appeals to a broad range of consumers. Our brand vision is accessible luxury that inspires a casual, fun and family-oriented lifestyle. We have positioned our brand to highlight the high quality, distinctive and vibrant styling and functional design of our products. Frequent releases of new designs help keep the brand fresh and our customers continually engaged.

Our recent growth reflects the expanding demographic appeal of our brand and product offerings. Our customers span generations and include young girls, teens, college students, young professionals, mothers and grandmothers. Our broad product offerings enable our customers to express their personal style in all aspects of their lives, whether at the beach, a weekend getaway, school or work.

We generate net revenues by selling products through two reportable segments: Indirect and Direct. As of May 1, 2010, our Indirect business consisted of sales of Vera Bradley products to approximately 3,300 independent retailers, substantially all of which are located in the U.S., as well as select national retailers and third party e-commerce sites. As of May 1, 2010, our Direct business consisted of sales of Vera Bradley products through our 28 full-price stores, our one outlet store, verabradley.com, and our annual outlet sale in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

Over the last five years, our net revenues have grown from $120.7 million in calendar year 2005 to $288.9 million in fiscal year 2010, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 23.9%. In 2007, we opened our first full-price Vera Bradley store and have experienced meaningful growth in our Direct business, growing our store base to 28 full-price stores as of May 1, 2010. Our full-price stores produced comparable-store sales of 36.4% in fiscal year 2010 and 22.3% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. In addition, we have experienced strong sales growth in our e-commerce business in recent years.

Evolution of Our Business

Beginning in 2005, we embarked on a series of strategic initiatives designed to take advantage of the growing interest in the Vera Bradley brand. These initiatives were designed to strengthen and enhance our business and operating

 

 

1


Table of Contents

model, expand our demographic and geographic market opportunity and position us for future growth. The core components of these initiatives include the following:

Merchandising Strategy.  To appeal to a broader range of consumers, we developed a mix of pattern and product offerings specifically targeted at different consumer demographics, refined our product release strategy to significantly expand our product portfolio and increased the number of new patterns released as well as the frequency of new product launches. In addition, we substantially enhanced our visual merchandising strategy, focusing on a consistent presentation of Vera Bradley as a lifestyle brand.

Multi-Channel Distribution Capability.  In 2006, we initiated a Direct channel strategy that was designed to expand our brand presence and broaden our consumer demographic while complementing the growing Indirect channel of our business. The first step in establishing the Direct channel of our business was selling directly to consumers through verabradley.com beginning in 2006. In 2007, we opened our first full-price store. In fiscal year 2010, we had more than 23 million visits to verabradley.com, and as of May 1, 2010, we had 28 full-price stores and one outlet store.

Infrastructure Investment.  Beginning in 2005, we made a series of investments to strengthen our supply chain capabilities, product development processes and information systems, resulting in substantial cost savings and a more flexible and scalable operating structure. During this period, we shifted our production from a primarily domestic manufacturing model to a more cost-effective global sourcing platform. In 2007, we opened a state-of-the-art warehouse and distribution facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

Competitive Strengths

We believe the following competitive strengths differentiate us within the marketplace and provide a strong foundation for our future growth:

Strong Brand Identity and Positioning.  We believe the Vera Bradley brand is highly recognized for its distinctive and vibrant style. Vera Bradley is positioned in the market as a lifestyle brand that inspires consumers to express their individuality and sense of style. We have also positioned our brand to highlight the high quality and functional attributes of our products. The Vera Bradley brand is more accessible than many competing brands, which allows us to attract a wide range of consumers and inspire repeat purchases.

Exceptional Customer Loyalty.  We believe that, as consumers become familiar with the Vera Bradley brand and begin using our products, they become loyal and enthusiastic brand advocates. We believe enthusiasm for our brand inspires repeat purchases and helps us expand our customer base. Our customers often purchase our products as gifts for family and friends, who, in turn, become loyal customers.

Product Development Expertise.  Our product development team combines an understanding of consumer preferences with a knowledge of color, fashion and style trends to design our products. Our highly creative design associates utilize a disciplined product design process that seeks to maximize the productivity of our product releases and drive consumer demand.

Dynamic Multi-Channel Distribution Model.  We offer our products through a diverse choice of shopping options across channels that are intimate, highly shop-able, fun and characteristic of our brand. Whether at a Vera Bradley store, an independent specialty retail store or verabradley.com, we believe consumers have an opportunity to find the brand in places that match their unique shopping interests. Our multi-channel distribution model enables us to maximize brand exposure and customer access to our products.

Established Network of Indirect Retailers.  Our Indirect business consists of an established and diverse network of over 3,300 independent retailers. This channel of gift, apparel and accessories, travel and specialty retailers, located

 

 

2


Table of Contents

throughout the U.S., provides a strong foundation for our future growth. Our Indirect retailers include some of the brand’s strongest advocates and their passion has been instrumental in the development of our brand.

Distinctive Retail Stores.  Our stores provide a shopping experience that is uniquely “Vera Bradley.” We bring the Vera Bradley brand to life in our stores through visual presentation of our wide range of product offerings, the stylish, inviting décor of our stores and personalized service from our friendly and knowledgeable sales associates. We believe the distinctive shopping experience and personalized service encourage repeat visits and multiple purchases.

Unique Company Culture.  We were founded in 1982 by two friends, Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia R. Miller, who built our company around their passion for design and commitment to customer service. We believe our founders created a unique company culture that attracts passionate and motivated employees who are excited about our products and our brand. Our employees share our founders’ commitment to Vera Bradley customers. We believe that a fun, friendly and welcoming work environment fosters creativity and collaboration and that, by empowering our employees to become personally involved in product design, testing and marketing, they become passionate and devoted brand advocates.

Experienced Management Team.  Our senior management team led by Michael C. Ray, our Chief Executive Officer, has extensive experience across a diverse range of disciplines in product design, merchandising, marketing, store development, supply chain management and finance. The current management team has been instrumental in the development and execution of our long-term strategies.

Growth Strategies

We believe there are significant opportunities to expand our business and increase our net revenues and net income through the execution of the following growth strategies:

Grow in Underpenetrated U.S. Markets.  Our historic growth focused primarily on the eastern U.S., and accordingly the Vera Bradley brand is most recognized in that region. In recent years, we have successfully expanded our Indirect and Direct channels in key developing markets in the midwest and southwest. We believe the success of our expansion efforts is a testament to the strength and portability of our brand and the power of our multi-channel distribution capabilities. We intend to rely on these strengths to further penetrate our existing markets and successfully expand both Direct and Indirect channels of our business into relatively underpenetrated markets in the midwest, southwest and west.

Expand Our U.S. Store Base.  We plan to expand our retail presence in the U.S. by opening new stores. We believe that the market in the U.S. can support at least 300 Vera Bradley full-price stores. We plan to open nine full-price stores and three outlet stores over the course of fiscal year 2011.

Drive Comparable-Store Sales and Our E-Commerce Business.  We have several ongoing initiatives to drive comparable-store sales growth, including focusing on store-level merchandising programs and enhancing in-store customer service and selling capabilities. As a key element of our Direct channel strategy, we will continue to grow our e-commerce business through focused marketing efforts, online merchandising initiatives and social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. We believe our retail and e-commerce businesses are complementary and facilitate frequent contact with our customers.

Expand Our Product Offerings.  We design products to “accessorize a woman’s life” and believe this core competence serves as a platform for growth within and beyond our current product lines. We have expanded our product offerings to include new line extensions, such as our “Vera Vera” microfiber collection, and brand extensions, such as our recently launched paper and stationery collection. We believe that opportunities exist to “accessorize a woman’s life” through complementary product collections that fit within our positioning as a lifestyle brand.

 

 

3


Table of Contents

Risk Factors

Our business is subject to risks, as discussed more fully in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8. In particular, the following risks, among others, may have an adverse effect on our growth strategies, which could cause a decrease in the price of our common stock and result in a loss of all or a portion of your investment:

 

  ¡  

possible adverse changes in general economic conditions and their impact on consumer confidence and consumer spending;

 

  ¡  

possible inability to predict and respond in a timely manner to changes in consumer demand;

 

  ¡  

possible loss of key management or design associates or inability to attract and retain the talent required for our business;

 

  ¡  

possible inability to maintain and enhance our brand;

 

  ¡  

possible inability to successfully implement our growth strategies or manage our growing business;

 

  ¡  

possible inability to successfully open and operate new stores as planned; and

 

  ¡  

possible inability to sustain levels of comparable-store sales.

Reorganization Transaction

Vera Bradley, Inc. is a newly-formed Indiana corporation that has not, to date, conducted any activities other than those incident to our formation and the preparation of this prospectus. We were formed solely for the purpose of reorganizing the corporate structure of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc.

We expect the shareholders of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. will contribute all of their equity interests in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. to us in return for shares of our common stock. As a result, Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. will become our wholly-owned subsidiary. We refer to the foregoing in this prospectus as our “reorganization transaction.”

Upon the completion of the reorganization transaction, the only asset of Vera Bradley, Inc. will be its investment in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc., and all of our operations will be conducted through Vera Bradley Designs, Inc.

Company Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 2208 Production Road, Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46808, and our telephone number at that address is (877) 708-8372. Our website is www.verabradley.com. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website is not part of this prospectus.

Prior to this offering, we were taxed as an “S” Corporation for purposes of federal and state income taxes. Accordingly, each of our shareholders has been required to include his or her portion of our taxable income or loss on his or her federal and state income tax returns. Upon the consummation of the reorganization transaction, our “S” Corporation status will automatically terminate and we will thereafter be subject to increased taxes.

“Vera Bradley” is a trademark of Vera Bradley. All other trademarks appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.

 

 

4


Table of Contents

Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Data

The following table presents summary consolidated financial and other data for the periods and at the dates indicated and certain pro forma information to reflect our conversion from an “S” Corporation to a “C” Corporation for tax purposes. The summary income statement data for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and January 30, 2010 and summary consolidated balance sheet data as of January 31, 2009 and January 30, 2010 are derived from our consolidated financial statements audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary income statement data for the fiscal quarters ended May 2, 2009 and May 1, 2010 and the summary balance sheet data as of May 1, 2010 are derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. You should read the following information together with the more detailed information contained in “Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

($ in thousands, except per share data and as otherwise indicated)   Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal Quarters Ended  
    January 31,
2009
    January 30,
2010
    May 2,
2009
    May 1,
2010
 
                (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Consolidated Statements of Income:

       

Net revenues

  $ 238,577      $ 288,940      $ 71,413      $ 85,002   

Cost of sales

    115,473        137,803        36,742        36,189   
                               

Gross profit

    123,104        151,137        34,671        48,813   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    109,195        116,168        30,013        33,637   

Other income

    13,282        10,743        3,474        2,125   
                               

Operating income

    27,191        45,712        8,132        17,301   

Interest expense, net

    2,511        1,604        632        308   
                               

Income before state income taxes

    24,680        44,108        7,500        16,993   

State income taxes

    1,009        889        132        199   
                               

Net income

  $ 23,671      $ 43,219      $ 7,368      $ 16,794   
                               

Basic and diluted net income per common share

  $ 23.67      $ 43.21      $ 7.37      $ 16.79   

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding

    1,000,100        1,000,100        1,000,100        1,000,100   

Pro Forma Data (unaudited):

       

Pro forma income tax expense(1)

  $ 9,872      $ 17,643      $ 3,000      $ 6,797   

Pro forma net income

    14,808        26,465        4,500        10,196   

Pro forma basic and diluted net income per common share

    14.81        26.46        4.50        10.19   

Net Revenues by Segment:

       

Indirect

  $ 167,454      $ 192,829      $ 47,376      $ 54,174   

Direct

    71,123        96,111        24,037        30,828   
                               

Total

  $ 238,577      $ 288,940      $ 71,413      $ 85,002   
                               

Full-Price Store Data:(2)

       

Total stores open at end of period

    21        26        22        28   

Comparable-store sales increase(3)

    8.0     36.4     33.8     22.3

Total gross square footage at end of period

    39,285        48,285        41,065        51,487   

Average net revenues per gross square foot(4)

  $ 578      $ 615        —          —     

 

($ in thousands)    Actual
May 1,
2010
   Pro forma
as adjusted
May  1,
2010(5)
     (unaudited)    (unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

  

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 1,350    $             

Working capital

     69,605   

Total assets

     159,798   

Long-term debt, including current portion

     34,880   

Shareholders’ equity

     81,386   

 

 

5


Table of Contents

 

(1) Reflects combined federal and state income taxes on a pro forma basis, as if we had been taxed as a “C” Corporation, using an effective tax rate of approximately 40%.

 

(2) These data exclude our one outlet store as of May 1, 2010.

 

(3) Comparable-store sales are the net revenues of our stores that have been open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the period. Increase or decrease is reported as a percentage of the comparable-store sales for the same period in the prior fiscal year.

 

(4) Dollars not in thousands. Average net revenues per gross square foot is calculated by dividing total net revenues for our stores that have been open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the period by total gross square footage for those stores.

 

(5) This column gives effect to (i) the completion of the reorganization transaction and the shareholders of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. contributing all of their equity interests in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. to us in return for shares of our common stock; and (ii) the sale by us of              shares of our common stock in this offering assuming an initial public offering price of $             per share, the mid-point of the filing range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

 

6


Table of Contents

The Offering

 

Common stock offered by us

            shares

 

Common stock offered by selling shareholders

             shares (excluding up to             shares that may be sold by the selling shareholders upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option)

 

Total shares offered

             shares

 

Common stock outstanding after the offering(1)

             shares

 

Use of proceeds

We expect our net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $            , after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses payable by us. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock by the selling shareholders. We intend to use our net proceeds from this offering to fund our final “S” Corporation distribution and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds.”

 

Dividend policy

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain earnings to fund our working capital needs and growth opportunities.

 

Risk factors

See “Risk Factors” and other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock.

 

Nasdaq Global Market symbol

“            ”

 

(1) The number of shares of our common stock outstanding after the offering set forth above is based on             shares of common stock outstanding as of                     , 2010 after giving effect to the reorganization transaction and the shareholders of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. contributing all of their equity interests in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc., including Class A voting common stock and Class B non-voting common stock, to us in return for shares of our common stock on a             -for-             basis and includes the shares to be sold by us in this offering. The number of shares outstanding after the offering does not include an aggregate of             shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”), which we intend to adopt in connection with the completion of this offering.

 

 

7


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider each of the risk factors set forth below and all of the other information in this prospectus before deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the events described below occur, then our business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed. In such an event, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us.

Risks Related to Our Business

Changes in general economic conditions, and their impact on consumer confidence and consumer spending, could adversely impact our results of operations.

Our performance is subject to general economic conditions and their impact on levels of consumer confidence and consumer spending. In recent years, consumer confidence and consumer spending deteriorated significantly, influenced by fluctuating interest rates and credit availability, changing fuel and other energy costs, fluctuating commodity prices, higher levels of unemployment and consumer debt levels, reductions in net worth based on market declines, home foreclosures and reductions in home values and general uncertainty regarding the overall future economic environment. Consumer purchases of discretionary items, including our merchandise, generally decline during periods when disposable income is adversely affected or there is economic uncertainty, and this could adversely impact our results of operations. In the event of another significant economic downturn, we could experience lower than expected net revenues, which could force us to delay or slow the implementation of our growth strategies and adversely impact our results of operations.

Our inability to predict and respond in a timely manner to changes in consumer demand could adversely affect our net revenues and results of operations.

Our success depends on our ability to gauge the fashion tastes of our customers and to provide merchandise that satisfies consumer demand in a timely manner. Our products must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject to rapid change. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to develop appealing patterns and styles or meet changing consumer demands in the future. If we misjudge the market for our products, then we may be faced with significant excess inventories for some products and missed opportunities for other products. Merchandise misjudgments could adversely impact our net revenues and results of operations.

Our results of operations could suffer if we lose key management or design associates or are unable to attract and retain the talent required for our business.

Our performance depends largely on the efforts and abilities of our senior management and product development teams. These executives and design associates have substantial experience in our business and have made significant contributions to our growth and success. We do not have employment agreements with any of our key executives or design associates. The unexpected loss of services of certain of these individuals could have adverse impacts on our business and results of operations. As our business grows and we open new stores, we will need to attract and retain additional qualified employees and develop, train and manage an increasing number of management-level, sales and other employees. Competition for qualified employees is intense. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain employees as needed in the future.

Our business depends on a strong brand. If we are unable to maintain and enhance our brand, then we may be unable to sell our products, which would adversely impact our results of operations.

We believe that the brand image that we have developed has contributed significantly to the success of our business. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing the Vera Bradley brand is critical to maintaining and expanding our customer base. Maintaining and enhancing our brand may require us to make substantial investments in areas such as product design, store operations and community relations. These investments might not succeed. If we are unable to maintain or enhance our brand image, then our results of operations would be adversely impacted.

 

8


Table of Contents

If we are unable to successfully implement our growth strategies or manage our growing business, then our future operating results could suffer.

The success of our growth strategies, alone or collectively, will depend on various factors, including the appeal of our product designs, retail presentation to consumers, competitive conditions and economic conditions. If we are unsuccessful in implementing some or all of our strategies or initiatives, our future operating results could be adversely impacted.

Successful implementation of our strategies will require us to manage our growth. To manage our growth effectively, we will need to continue to increase production while maintaining strict quality control. We also will need to continue to improve and invest in our systems and processes to keep pace with planned increases in demand. We could suffer a decline in sales if our products do not continue to meet our quality control standards or if we are unable to respond adequately to increases in customer demand for our products.

We may not be able to successfully open and operate new stores as planned, which could adversely impact our results of operations.

Our continued growth will depend on our ability to successfully open and operate new stores. We intend to open nine full-price stores and three outlet stores over the course of fiscal year 2011. Our ability to successfully open and operate new stores depends on many factors, including our ability to:

 

  ¡  

identify suitable store locations, the availability of which is outside our control;

 

  ¡  

negotiate acceptable lease terms, including desired tenant improvement allowances;

 

  ¡  

hire, train and retain store personnel and management;

 

  ¡  

assimilate new store personnel and management into our corporate culture;

 

  ¡  

source and manufacture inventory; and

 

  ¡  

successfully integrate new stores into our existing operations and information technology systems.

The success of new store openings may also be affected by our ability to initiate marketing efforts in advance of opening our first store in a particular region. Additionally, we will encounter pre-operating costs and we may encounter initial losses while new stores commence operations, which could strain our resources and adversely impact our results of operations.

Our inability to sustain levels of comparable-store sales could cause our stock price to decline.

We may not be able to sustain the levels of comparable-store sales that we have experienced in the recent past. If our future comparable-store sales decline or fail to meet market expectations, then the price of our common stock could decline. Also, the aggregate results of operations of our stores have fluctuated in the past and will fluctuate in the future. Numerous factors influence comparable-store sales, including fashion trends, competition, national and regional economic conditions, pricing, inflation, the timing of the release of new merchandise and promotional events, changes in our merchandise mix, inventory shrinkage, marketing programs and weather conditions. In addition, many companies with retail operations have been unable to sustain high levels of comparable-store sales during and after periods of substantial expansion. These factors may cause our comparable-store sales results to be lower in the future than in recent periods or lower than expectations, either of which could result in a decline in the price of our common stock.

We are subject to risks associated with leasing substantial amounts of space, including future increases in occupancy costs.

We do not own any real estate other than our warehouse and distribution facility. We lease our corporate headquarters, our other offices and all of our store locations. We typically occupy our stores under operating leases with

 

9


Table of Contents

terms of ten years. We have been able to negotiate favorable rental rates over the last year due in part to the state of the economy and high vacancy rates within some shopping centers, but there is no assurance that we will be able to continue to negotiate such favorable terms. Some of our leases have early cancellation clauses, which permit the lease to be terminated by us or the landlord if certain sales levels are not met in specific periods or if the shopping center does not meet specified occupancy standards. In addition to future minimum lease payments, some of our store leases provide for the payment of common area maintenance charges, real property insurance and real estate taxes. Many of our lease agreements have escalating rent provisions over the initial term and any extensions. As we expand our store base, our lease expense and our cash outlays for rent under lease agreements will increase. Our substantial operating lease obligations could have significant negative consequences, including:

 

  ¡  

requiring that a substantial portion of our available cash be applied to pay our rental obligations, thus reducing cash available for other purposes;

 

  ¡  

increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

 

  ¡  

limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business or industry; and

 

  ¡  

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing.

Any of these consequences could place us at a disadvantage with respect to our competitors. We depend on cash flow from operating activities to pay our lease expenses and to fulfill our other cash needs. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities to fund these expenses and needs, then we may not be able to service our lease expenses, grow our business, respond to competitive challenges or fund our other liquidity and capital needs, which would harm our business.

Additional sites that we lease may be subject to long-term non-cancelable leases if we are unable to negotiate our current standard lease terms. If an existing or future store is not profitable and we decide to close it, then we may nonetheless be committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease, including paying the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Moreover, even if a lease has an early cancellation clause, we may not satisfy the contractual requirements for early cancellation under the lease. Our inability to enter new leases or renew existing leases on acceptable terms or be released from our obligations under leases for stores that we close would, in any such case, affect us adversely.

We operate in a competitive market. Our competitors might develop products more popular with consumers than our products.

The market for handbags, accessories and travel and leisure items is competitive. Our competitive challenges include:

 

  ¡  

attracting consumer traffic;

 

  ¡  

sourcing and manufacturing merchandise efficiently;

 

  ¡  

competitively pricing our products and achieving customer perception of value;

 

  ¡  

maintaining favorable brand recognition and effectively marketing our products to consumers in diverse market segments;

 

  ¡  

developing designs that appeal to a broad range of demographic and age segments;

 

  ¡  

developing high-quality products; and

 

  ¡  

establishing and maintaining good working relationships with our Indirect retailers.

 

10


Table of Contents

In our Indirect business, we compete with numerous manufacturers, importers and distributors of handbags, accessories and other products for the limited space available for the display of such products to the consumer. In our Direct business, we compete against other gift and specialty retailers, department stores, catalog retailers and Internet businesses that engage in the retail sale of similar products. Moreover, the general availability of contract manufacturing allows new entrants easy access to the markets in which we compete, which may increase the number of competitors and adversely affect our competitive position and our business.

We rely on various contract manufacturers to produce a significant majority of our products and generally do not have long-term contracts with our manufacturers or suppliers. Accordingly, we risk significant disruptions in supply from our current sources. Disruptions in our suppliers’ systems, losses of manufacturing certifications or other actions by these suppliers could increase our cost of sales, adversely affect our net revenues and injure our reputation and customer relationships, thereby harming our business.

Our various contract manufacturers produce a significant majority of our products. We generally do not enter into long-term formal written agreements, or even blanket purchase orders, with our manufacturers or suppliers and instead transact business with each of them order by order. As a result, we may experience significant disruption in the supply of fabrics or raw materials from our current sources. In the event of a disruption, we may be unable to locate alternative suppliers of materials of comparable quality at an acceptable price (or at all). Identifying a suitable supplier is an involved process that requires us to become satisfied with the prospective supplier’s quality control, responsiveness and service, financial stability and labor practices. Any delay, interruption, increased cost in the supply of fabric or manufactured products or other supply disruption that might occur for any reason, such as the lack of long-term contracts or regulatory requirements and the loss of certifications, power interruptions, fires, hurricanes, war or threats of terrorism, could affect our ability to meet customer demand for our products, adversely affect our net revenues, increase our cost of sales and hurt our results of operations. In addition, supply disruption could injure our reputation and customer relationships, thereby harming our business.

We rely on a single warehouse and distribution facility for all of the products we sell. Disruption to that facility could adversely impact our results of operations, and expansion of that facility could have unpredictable adverse effects.

Our warehouse and distribution operations are currently concentrated in a single company-owned distribution center in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Any significant disruption in the operation of the facility due to natural disaster or severe weather, or events such as fire, accidents, power outages, system failures or other unforeseen causes, could devalue or damage a significant portion of our inventory and could adversely affect our product distribution and sales until such time as we could secure an alternative facility. In addition, our growth could require us to expand our current facility, which could affect us adversely in ways that we cannot predict.

The cost of raw materials could increase our cost of sales and cause our results of operations to suffer.

Fluctuations in the price, availability and quality of fabrics or other raw materials used to manufacture our products, as well as the price for labor, marketing and transportation, could have adverse impacts on our cost of sales and our ability to meet our customers’ demands. Because a key component of our quilted products is petroleum-based, the cost of oil affects the cost of our products. Upward movement in the price of oil in the global oil markets would also likely result in rising fuel and freight prices, which could increase our shipping costs. In addition, fluctuations in the price of cotton, our primary raw material, could have an adverse impact on our cost of sales. In the future, we may not be able to pass all or a portion of higher costs on to our customers.

Our business is subject to the risks inherent in global sourcing and manufacturing activities.

We source our fabrics primarily from manufacturers in China and South Korea and outsource the production of a significant majority of our products to companies in Asia. We are subject to the risks inherent in global sourcing and manufacturing, including, but not limited to:

 

  ¡  

exchange rate fluctuations and trends;

 

  ¡  

availability of raw materials;

 

11


Table of Contents
  ¡  

compliance with labor laws and other foreign governmental regulations;

 

  ¡  

compliance with U.S. import and export laws and regulations;

 

  ¡  

disruption or delays in shipments;

 

  ¡  

loss or impairment of key manufacturing sites;

 

  ¡  

product quality issues;

 

  ¡  

political unrest; and

 

  ¡  

natural disasters, acts of war and terrorism and other external factors over which we have no control.

Significant disruption of manufacturing for any of the above reasons could interrupt product supply and, if not remedied in a timely manner, could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Additionally, we do not have complete oversight over our contract manufacturers. Violation of labor or other laws by those manufacturers, or the divergence of a contract manufacturer’s labor or other practices from those generally accepted as ethical in the U.S. or other markets in which we may in the future do business, could also draw negative publicity for us and our brand, diminishing the value of our brand and reducing demand for our products.

Our ability to source our products at favorable prices, or at all, could be harmed, with adverse effects on our results of operations, if new trade restrictions are imposed or if existing trade restrictions become more burdensome.

A significant majority of our products are currently manufactured for us in Asia. The U.S. and the countries in which our products are produced have imposed and may impose additional quotas, duties, tariffs or other restrictions or regulations or may adversely adjust prevailing quotas, duties or tariffs. Countries impose, modify and remove tariffs and other trade restrictions in response to a diverse array of factors, including global and national economic and political conditions, which make it impossible for us to predict future developments regarding tariffs and other trade restrictions. Trade restrictions, which include embargoes, safeguards and customs restrictions, could increase the cost or reduce the supply of products available to us or could require us to modify supply chain organization or other current business practices, any of which could harm our results of operations.

We may be subject to unionization, work stoppages, slowdowns or increased labor costs, especially if the Employee Free Choice Act is adopted.

Currently, none of our employees is represented by a union. Nevertheless, our employees have the right at any time under the National Labor Relations Act to organize or affiliate with a union. If some or all of our workforce were to become unionized, then our business would be exposed to work stoppages and slowdowns as a unionized business. If, in addition, the terms of the collective bargaining agreement were significantly more favorable to union workers than our current pay-and-benefits arrangements, then our costs would increase and our results of operations would suffer. The Employee Free Choice Act of 2007: H.R. 800, or EFCA, was passed in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2007 and the same legislation has been re-introduced as H.R. 1409 and S. 560. President Obama and leaders of Congress have made public statements in support of this bill. Accordingly, the EFCA, or a variant of it, could become law. Enactment of the EFCA could have adverse effects on our business by making it easier for workers to obtain union representation and by increasing the penalties that employers may incur by engaging in labor practices that violate the National Labor Relations Act.

Our results of operations are subject to quarterly fluctuations, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including, among other things:

 

  ¡  

the timing of new store openings;

 

  ¡  

net revenues and profits contributed by new stores;

 

12


Table of Contents
  ¡  

increases or decreases in comparable-store sales;

 

  ¡  

shifts in the timing of holidays, particularly in the U.S. and China;

 

  ¡  

changes in our merchandise mix; and

 

  ¡  

the timing of new pattern releases and new product introductions.

As a result of these quarterly fluctuations, we believe that comparisons of our sales and operating results between different quarters within a single fiscal year are not necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of our future performance. Any quarterly fluctuations that we report in the future may not match the expectations of market analysts and investors. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly.

We rely on independent transportation providers for substantially all of our product shipments.

We currently rely on independent transportation service providers for substantially all of our product shipments. Our utilization of these delivery services, or those of any other shipping companies that we may elect to use, is subject to risks, including increases in fuel prices, which would increase our shipping costs, and employee strikes and inclement weather, which may impact the shipping company’s ability to provide delivery services sufficient to meet our shipping needs.

If for any reason we were to change shipping companies, then we could face logistical difficulties that might adversely affect deliveries, and we would incur costs and expend resources in the course of making the change. Moreover, we might not be able to obtain terms as favorable as those received from the service providers that we currently use, which in turn would increase our costs. We also would face shipping and distribution risks and uncertainties associated with any expansion of our warehouse and distribution facility and related systems.

We plan to use cash provided by operating activities to fund our expanding business and execute our growth strategies and may require additional capital, which may not be available to us.

Our business relies on cash provided by operating activities as our primary source of liquidity. To support our growing business and execute our growth strategies, we will need significant amounts of cash from that source, including funds to pay our lease obligations, build out new store space, purchase inventory, pay personnel, invest further in our infrastructure and facilities and pay for the increased costs associated with operating as a public company. If our business does not generate cash flow from operating activities sufficient to fund these activities, and if sufficient funds are not otherwise available to us from the proceeds of this offering and our existing revolving credit facility, then we will need to seek additional capital, through debt or equity financings, to fund our growth. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise needed cash on terms acceptable to us or at all. Additional debt financing that we may undertake might impose upon us covenants that restrict our operations and strategic initiatives, including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, repurchase our capital stock, make investments and engage in merger, consolidation and asset sale transactions. Equity financings may be on terms that are dilutive or potentially dilutive to our shareholders, and the prices at which new investors would be willing to purchase our equity securities may be lower than the price per share of our common stock in this offering. The holders of new securities may also have rights, preferences or privileges that are senior to those of existing holders of common stock. If new sources of financing are required, but are insufficient or unavailable, then we will be required to modify our growth and operating plans based on available funding, if any, which would inhibit our growth and could harm our business.

We face various risks as an e-commerce retailer.

Business risks relating to e-commerce sales include the need to keep pace with rapid technological change, internet security risks, risks of system failure or inadequacy, governmental regulation and taxation. We have contracted with several different companies to maintain and operate various aspects of our e-commerce business and are reliant on them and their ability to perform their tasks, as well as their operational, privacy and security procedures and controls as they affect our business. If the independent contractors on which we rely fail to perform their tasks, we could incur liability or suffer damages to our reputation, or both.

 

13


Table of Contents

Our copyrights, trademarks and other proprietary rights could conflict with the rights of others, and we may be inhibited from selling some of our products. If we are unable to protect our copyrights and other proprietary rights, then others may sell imitation brand products.

We believe that our registered copyrights, registered and common law trademarks and other proprietary rights have significant value and are critical to our ability to create and sustain demand for our products. Although we have not been inhibited from selling our products in connection with intellectual property disputes, we cannot assure you that obstacles will not arise as we expand our product line and extend our brand as well as the geographic scope of our sales and marketing. We also cannot assure you that the actions taken by us to establish and protect our proprietary rights will be adequate to prevent imitation of our products or infringement of our rights by others. The legal regimes of some foreign countries, particularly China, may not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S., and it may be more difficult for us to successfully challenge the use of our proprietary rights by others in these countries. The loss of copyrights, trademarks and other proprietary rights could adversely impact our results of operations. Any litigation regarding our proprietary rights could be time-consuming and costly.

Prior to this offering, we were treated as an “S” Corporation under Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code, and claims of taxing authorities related to our prior status as an “S” Corporation could harm us. Possible changes in tax laws also would affect our results.

Upon the completion of the reorganization transaction, our “S” Corporation status will terminate automatically and we will thereafter be subject to increased federal and state income taxes. If the unaudited, open tax years in which we were an “S” Corporation are audited by the Internal Revenue Service, and we are determined not to have qualified for, or to have violated, our “S” Corporation status, we will be obligated to pay back taxes, interest and penalties, and we do not have the right to reclaim tax distributions we have made to our shareholders during those periods. These amounts could include taxes on all of our taxable income while we were an “S” Corporation. Any such claims could result in additional costs to us and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, possible changes in federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax laws bearing upon our revenues, income, property or other aspects of our operations or business would, if enacted, affect our results of operations in ways and to a degree that we cannot currently predict.

Failure to maintain adequate financial and management processes and controls could lead to errors in our financial reporting, which could have an adverse impact on our business.

Reporting obligations as a public company may place a considerable strain on our financial and management systems, processes and controls, as well as on our personnel. In addition, as a public company we will be required to document and test our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 so that our management can certify the effectiveness of our internal controls and our independent registered public accounting firm can render an opinion on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting by the time our annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2012 is due and thereafter. As a result, we will be required to improve our financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and procedures, to incur substantial expenses to test our systems and to hire additional qualified personnel. If our management is unable to certify the effectiveness of our internal controls or if our independent registered public accounting firm cannot render a favorable opinion on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, or if material weaknesses in our internal controls are identified, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and loss of public confidence, which could harm our business and cause a decline in our stock price. In addition, if we do not maintain adequate financial and management personnel, processes and controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial performance timely, which could cause a decline in our stock price and harm our ability to raise capital. Failure to accurately report our financial performance timely could also jeopardize our continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Market.

We will incur significant expenses as a result of being a public company, which will negatively impact our results of operations.

We will incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses as a result of being a public company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as other rules implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)

 

14


Table of Contents

and by The Nasdaq Stock Market, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect that compliance with these laws, rules and regulations will substantially increase our expenses, including our legal and accounting costs, and make some activities more time-consuming and costly than in the past. We also expect these laws, rules and regulations to make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required either to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may become more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as officers. As a result of the foregoing, we expect a substantial increase in legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses in the future, which will negatively impact our results of operations.

Our Indirect business could suffer as a result of bankruptcies or operational or financial difficulties of our Indirect retailers.

We do not enter into long-term agreements with any of our Indirect retailers. Instead, we enter into a number of purchase order commitments with our customers for each of our lines every season. A decision by a significant number of Indirect retailers, whether motivated by competitive conditions, operational or financial difficulties, reduced access to capital, or otherwise, to decrease or eliminate the amount of merchandise purchased from us or to change their manner of doing business with us could adversely impact our results of operations. As a result of the recent unfavorable economic environment, we have experienced a softening of demand from a number of Indirect retailers. Although we recommend retail sale prices for our products to our Indirect retailers, we do not provide dealer allowances or other economic incentives to support those prices. Possible promotional pricing or discounting by Indirect retailers in response to softening retail demand could have a negative effect on our brand image and prestige, which might be difficult to counteract as the economy improves.

We sell our Indirect merchandise primarily to specialty retail stores across the U.S. and extend trade credit based on an evaluation of each Indirect retailer’s financial condition, usually without requiring collateral. Perceived financial difficulties of a customer could cause us to curtail or eliminate business with that customer. Pending the resolution of a relationship with a financially troubled Indirect retailer, we might assume credit risk that we would otherwise avoid relating to our receivables from that customer. Inability to collect on accounts receivable from our Indirect retailers would adversely impact our results of operations.

Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our securities have no prior market. We cannot assure you that our stock price will not decline after the offering.

Before this offering, there has not been a public market for our common stock, and an active public market for our common stock may not develop or be sustained after this offering. The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations after this offering. The price of our stock may change in response to variations in our operating results and also may change in response to other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:

 

  ¡  

fashion trends and changes in consumer preferences;

 

  ¡  

the timing of new store openings and the relative proportion of our new stores to existing stores;

 

  ¡  

the performance and successful integration of new stores that we open;

 

  ¡  

changes in our merchandise mix;

 

  ¡  

the timing of promotional events;

 

  ¡  

our levels of comparable-store sales;

 

  ¡  

announcements by us or our competitors of new product offerings;

 

15


Table of Contents
  ¡  

actions by competitors or other shopping mall or lifestyle center tenants;

 

  ¡  

weather conditions, particularly during the holiday shopping period;

 

  ¡  

the level of pre-opening expenses associated with new stores;

 

  ¡  

inventory shrinkage;

 

  ¡  

the financial projections that we may choose to provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure for any reason to meet these projections;

 

  ¡  

changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our common stock, our failure to meet these estimates or failure of these analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of our common stock;

 

  ¡  

ratings downgrades by any securities analysts who follow our common stock;

 

  ¡  

the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock;

 

  ¡  

the public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or others, including our filings with the SEC and announcements relating to litigation;

 

  ¡  

speculation about our business in the press or the investment community;

 

  ¡  

future sales of our common stock by our significant shareholders, officers and directors;

 

  ¡  

our entry into new markets;

 

  ¡  

significant developments relating to our manufacturing or distribution relationships;

 

  ¡  

strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

 

  ¡  

customer purchases of new products from us and our competitors;

 

  ¡  

actions by institutional shareholders;

 

  ¡  

additions or departures of key personnel;

 

  ¡  

changes in accounting principles;

 

  ¡  

market conditions and trends in our industry or the economy as a whole and, in particular, in the specialty retail sales environment;

 

  ¡  

domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our business actions; and

 

  ¡  

other events or factors, including those resulting from war, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or responses to these events.

In particular, we cannot assure you that you will be able to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the initial public offering price. The initial public offering price will be determined by negotiations between the representatives of the underwriters and us.

Because a limited number of shareholders will control the majority of the voting power of our common stock, investors in this offering will not be able to determine the outcome of shareholder votes.

Upon the completion of this offering, Barbara Bradley Baekgaard, Patricia R. Miller and P. Michael Miller will, directly or indirectly, beneficially own and have the ability to exercise voting control over, in the aggregate,     % of our

 

16


Table of Contents

outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, these shareholders will be able to exercise significant control over all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors, any amendments to our amended and restated articles of incorporation and significant corporate transactions. These shareholders may exercise this control even if they are opposed by our other shareholders. Without the consent of these shareholders, we could be delayed or prevented from entering into transactions (including the acquisition of our company by third parties) that may be viewed as beneficial to us or our other shareholders. In addition, this significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock should investors perceive disadvantages in owning shares of common stock in a company that has controlling shareholders.

Possible future sales of our common stock could negatively affect our stock price after this offering.

After this offering, we will have             shares of common stock outstanding,             of which will be available for immediate public sale. The remaining             shares of common stock outstanding after this offering, including an aggregate of shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by Barbara Bradley Baekgaard, Patricia R. Miller and P. Michael Miller, will be available for sale 180 days after the date of this prospectus, subject to volume, manner of sale and other limitations under SEC Rules 144 and 701. Additional sales of our common stock in the public market after this offering, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our directors, officers and shareholders have agreed to enter into “lock-up” agreements with the underwriters, in which they will agree to refrain from selling their shares for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus. Approximately             of our shares will become available for sale                     days after such date upon the expiration of these agreements. Possible sales of these shares of our common stock in the market could exert significant downward pressure on our stock price. Possible sales also may make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price we deem necessary or appropriate.

Our board of directors intends to approve, in connection with the completion of this offering, a 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”), which will permit us to issue, among other things, stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock to eligible employees, including our named executive officers, as determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors. We intend to file a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as soon as practicable after the completion of this offering to cover the resale of shares issued upon the exercise of options granted, and of shares granted, under the 2010 Plan. As a result, any shares issued or optioned under the 2010 Plan after the completion of this offering also will be freely tradable in the public market. If equity securities are granted under the 2010 Plan and it is perceived that they will be sold in the public market, then the price of our common stock could decline substantially.

If securities analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us, the price of our common stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the research and reports that securities analysts choose to publish about us. We do not control these analysts. The price of our stock could decline if one or more securities analysts downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us or cease publishing reports about us.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We intend to retain all of our earnings for the foreseeable future to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends. As a result, you can expect to receive a return on your investment in our common stock only if the market price of the stock increases.

We will have broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this offering.

We will have broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds to us from this offering, and you will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors and management regarding the application of those proceeds. Although we intend to use

 

17


Table of Contents

our net proceeds from this offering for our final “S” Corporation distribution and for working capital and other general corporate purposes, we have not allocated these net proceeds for specific purposes. It is possible that a substantial portion of the net proceeds will be invested in a way that does not yield a favorable, or any, investment return.

Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Indiana law may discourage or prevent a change in control, even if a sale of the company would be beneficial to our shareholders, which could cause our stock price to decline and prevent attempts by shareholders to replace or remove our current management.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws will contain provisions that may delay or prevent a change in control, discourage bids at a premium over the market price of our common stock, harm the market price of our common stock and diminish the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock. These provisions include:

 

  ¡  

dividing our board of directors into three classes serving staggered three-year terms;

 

  ¡  

authorizing our board of directors to issue preferred stock and additional shares of our common stock without shareholder approval;

 

  ¡  

prohibiting shareholder action by written consent;

 

  ¡  

prohibiting our shareholders from calling a special meeting of shareholders;

 

  ¡  

prohibiting our shareholders from making certain changes to our amended and restated articles of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws except with 66 2/3% shareholder approval; and

 

  ¡  

requiring advance notice for raising business matters or nominating directors at shareholders’ meetings.

As permitted by our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws, upon consummation of this offering our board of directors also will have the ability, should they so determine, to adopt a shareholder rights agreement, sometimes called a “poison pill,” providing for the issuance of a new series of preferred stock to holders of common stock. In the event of a takeover attempt, this preferred stock would give rights to holders of common stock (other than the potential acquirer) to buy additional shares of common stock at a discount, leading to the dilution of the potential acquirer’s stake. The adoption of a poison pill, or the board’s ability to do so, can have negative effects such as those described above.

As an Indiana corporation, we are governed by the Indiana Business Corporation Law (as amended from time to time, the “IBCL”). Under specified circumstances, certain provisions of the IBCL related to control share acquisitions, business combinations and constituent interests may delay, prevent or make more difficult unsolicited acquisitions or changes of control of us. These provisions also may have the effect of preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that shareholders might deem to be in their best interest. A general description of these provisions is contained under the heading “Description of Capital Stock — Certain Provisions of the Indiana Business Corporation Law.”

 

18


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical or current fact included in this prospectus are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements refer to our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, strategies, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “can have,” “likely” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. For example, all statements we make relating to our estimated and projected earnings, revenues, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates and financial results, our plans and objectives for future operations, growth or initiatives, strategies or the expected outcome or impact of pending or threatened litigation are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected, including:

 

  ¡  

possible adverse changes in general economic conditions and their impact on consumer confidence and consumer spending;

 

  ¡  

possible inability to predict and respond in a timely manner to changes in consumer demand;

 

  ¡  

possible loss of key management or design associates or inability to attract and retain the talent required for our business;

 

  ¡  

possible inability to maintain and enhance our brand;

 

  ¡  

possible inability to successfully implement our growth strategies or manage our growing business;

 

  ¡  

possible inability to successfully open and operate new stores as planned; and

 

  ¡  

possible inability to sustain levels of comparable-store sales.

We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based upon detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results.

See “Risk Factors” for a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties mentioned above and for discussion of other risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements as well as others made in this prospectus and hereafter in our other SEC filings and public communications. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made by us in the context of these risks and uncertainties.

We caution you that the risks and uncertainties identified by us may not be all of the factors that are important to you. Furthermore, the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

 

19


Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of the             shares of our common stock we are offering will be approximately $             million, assuming an initial public offering price of $             per share, the midpoint of the filing range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, and after deducting the underwriting discounts and estimated expenses payable by us. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock by the selling shareholders.

We intend to use our net proceeds from this offering to fund our final “S” Corporation distribution and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. As of the date of this prospectus, we have no binding commitment or agreement relating to any acquisition or investment. We have not yet determined the amount of our net proceeds to be used specifically for any of the foregoing purposes. Accordingly, management will have significant flexibility in applying our net proceeds of this offering. Pending their use, we intend to invest the balance of our net proceeds from this offering in short-term, investment-grade, interest-bearing instruments.

DIVIDEND POLICY

Historically, due to our status as an “S” Corporation, we have distributed annually to our shareholders an amount no less than 40.5% of our prior year’s taxable income. During fiscal years 2009 and 2010, we paid distributions of $24.1 million and $25.6 million, respectively. From the proceeds of this offering, we estimate that we will distribute an additional $             to our shareholders as a final distribution resulting from the termination of our “S” Corporation status. Upon completion of the reorganization transaction, we will automatically convert to a “C” Corporation.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock after the completion of this offering. We intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Any determination in the future to pay dividends will depend upon our financial condition, capital requirements, operating results and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors, including any contractual or statutory restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

 

20


Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of May 1, 2010:

 

  ¡  

on an actual basis; and

 

  ¡  

on a pro forma basis as adjusted to give effect to: (i) the completion of the reorganization transaction and the shareholders of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. contributing all of their equity interests in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. to us in return for shares of our common stock on a             -for-             basis; and (ii) the sale of             shares of our common stock offered by us in this offering assuming an initial public offering price of $             per share, the midpoint of the filing range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

You should read this table together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Description of Capital Stock,” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

($ in thousands)    As of May 1, 2010
     Actual    Pro forma
as adjusted
     (unaudited)    (unaudited)

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 1,350    $             

Long-term debt, including current portion

     34,880   

Shareholders’ equity

     

Capital stock (Class A), voting, without par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 80 shares issued and outstanding

     1   

Capital stock (Class B), non-voting, without par value; 1,500,000 shares authorized; 1,000,020 shares issued and outstanding

     —     

Newly issued common stock, without par value;              shares authorized;
             shares issued and outstanding

     

Additional paid-in capital

     —     

Retained earnings

     81,385   
             

Total shareholders’ equity

     81,386   
             

Total capitalization

   $ 116,266    $  
             

 

21


Table of Contents

DILUTION

If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this offering.

Our pro forma net tangible book value as of May 1, 2010 was approximately $             million, or $             per share of common stock. Pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets reduced by the amount of our total liabilities, divided by the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the completion of the reorganization transaction and each shareholder of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. contributing all of their equity interests in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. to us in return for shares of our common stock on a             -for-             basis.

After giving effect to the sale of the              shares of common stock offered by us assuming an initial public offering price of $              per share, the midpoint of the filing range set forth on the cover of this prospectus less the underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and after the recognition of a net deferred tax liability of $              resulting from the termination of our “S” Corporation status, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of May 1, 2010 would have been approximately              , or              per share. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value of              per share to existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of             per share to new investors. The following table illustrates this dilution.

 

Assumed initial public offering price per share

      $             
         

Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of May 1, 2010

   $                

Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to this offering

     
         

Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of May 1, 2010, as adjusted for this offering

     
         

Dilution per share to new investors

      $  
         

After this offering and assuming the exercise in full of all options outstanding and exercisable as of May 1, 2010, pro forma net tangible book value per share as of May 1, 2010, as adjusted for this offering, would have been             , representing an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value of             per share to existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of             per share to new investors.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of             shares by the selling shareholders.

The following table sets forth on a pro forma basis as of May 1, 2010, after giving effect to the completion of the reorganization transaction and the shareholders of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. contributing all of their equity interests in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. to us in return for shares of our common stock on a             -for-             basis:

 

  ¡  

the number of shares of our common stock purchased by existing shareholders and the total consideration and the average price per share paid for those shares; and

 

  ¡  

the number of shares of our common stock purchased by new investors and the total consideration and the average price per share paid for those shares (assuming an initial public offering price of $             per share, the midpoint of the filing range set forth on the cover of this prospectus).

 

22


Table of Contents
     Shares Purchased     Total Consideration     Average Price
Per  Share
         Number            Percent             Amount            Percent        

Existing shareholders

             $                        $             

New investors

                                      
                              

Total

             $             $  
                              

The information and tables above exclude:

 

  ¡  

             shares of common stock that we intend to grant to certain employees and directors prior to the completion of this offering; and

 

  ¡  

             shares of common stock available for grants under our 2010 Plan.

The issuance of such shares of common stock should be expected to result in further dilution to new investors.

 

23


Table of Contents

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

The following table presents selected consolidated financial and other data as of and for the periods indicated and certain pro forma information to reflect our conversion from an “S” Corporation to a “C” Corporation for income tax purposes. The selected income statement data for the calendar year ended December 31, 2007 and for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and January 30, 2010 and selected consolidated balance sheet data as of January 31, 2009 and January 30, 2010 are derived from our consolidated financial statements audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007 are derived from our consolidated financial statements audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, that have not been included in this prospectus. The selected income statement data for the calendar years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 are derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements that have not been included in this prospectus. The selected income statement data for the fiscal quarters ended May 2, 2009 and May 1, 2010 and the selected balance sheet data as of May 2, 2009 and May 1, 2010 are derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. You should read this selected consolidated financial data in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and the information under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

($ in thousands, except per share data and as
otherwise indicated)
  Years Ended   Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal Quarters Ended  
    December 31,
2005
  December 31,
2006
    December  31,
2007(1)
  January 31,
2009(1)
    January 30,
2010
    May 2,
2009
    May 1,
2010
 
    (unaudited)   (unaudited)                     (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Consolidated Statements of Income:

             

Net revenues

  $ 120,650   $ 189,148      $ 281,085   $ 238,577      $ 288,940      $ 71,413      $ 85,002   

Cost of sales

    61,385     94,612        133,522     115,473        137,803        36,742        36,189   
                                                   

Gross profit

    59,265     94,536        147,563     123,104        151,137        34,671        48,813   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    31,124     50,679        101,022     109,195        116,168        30,013        33,637   

Other income

    2,133     1,464        7,799     13,282        10,743        3,474        2,125   
                                                   

Operating income

    30,274     45,321        54,340     27,191        45,712        8,132        17,301   

Interest expense (income), net

    316     (322     2,924     2,511        1,604        632        308   
                                                   

Income before state income taxes

    29,958     45,643        51,416     24,680        44,108        7,500        16,993   

State income taxes

    —       —          1,185     1,009        889        132        199   
                                                   

Net income

  $ 29,958   $ 45,643      $ 50,231   $ 23,671      $ 43,219      $ 7,368      $ 16,794   
                                                   

Basic and diluted net income per common share

  $ 29.96   $ 45.64      $ 50.23   $ 23.67      $ 43.21      $ 7.37      $ 16.79   

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding

    1,000,100     1,000,100        1,000,100     1,000,100        1,000,100        1,000,100        1,000,100   

Pro Forma Data (unaudited):

             

Pro forma income tax expense(2)

  $ 11,983   $ 18,257      $ 20,566   $ 9,872      $ 17,643      $ 3,000      $ 6,797   

Pro forma net income

    17,975     27,386        30,850     14,808        26,465        4,500        10,196   

Pro forma basic and diluted net income per common share

    17.97     27.38        30.85     14.81        26.46        4.50        10.19   

Net Revenues by Segment:

             

Indirect

  $ 115,229   $ 175,397      $ 243,388   $ 167,454      $ 192,829      $ 47,376      $ 54,174   

Direct

    5,421     13,751        37,697     71,123        96,111        24,037        30,828   
                                                   

Total

  $ 120,650   $ 189,148      $ 281,085   $ 238,577      $ 288,940      $ 71,413      $ 85,002   
                                                   

Full-Price Store Data:(3)

             

Total stores open at end of period

    —       —          7     21        26        22        28   

Comparable-store sales increase(4)

    —       —          —       8.0     36.4     33.8     22.3

Total gross square footage at end of period

    —       —          11,927     39,285        48,285        41,065        51,487   

Average net revenues per gross square foot(5)

    —       —          —     $ 578      $ 615        —          —     

 

24


Table of Contents

 

    Years Ended   Fiscal Years Ended   Fiscal Quarters Ended
    December 31,
2005
  December 31,
2006
  December  31,
2007(1)
  January 31,
2009(1)
  January 30,
2010
  May 2,
2009
  May 1,
2010
    (unaudited)   (unaudited)               (unaudited)   (unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 11,674   —     $ 111   $ 776   $ 6,509   $ 2,354   $ 1,350

Working capital

    30,417   33,010     15,774     62,498     61,238     52,847     69,605

Total assets

    45,665   99,772     133,482     149,931     153,752     138,946     159,798

Long-term debt, including current portion

    5,513   19,011     54,901     58,825     30,136     43,341     34,880

Shareholders’ equity

    29,230   40,493     49,563     57,947     77,893     61,904     81,386

 

(1) In January 2008, we changed our fiscal year end from December 31 to the Saturday closest to January 31. The following table presents the consolidated financial and other data as of and for the months ended January 31, 2007 and January 31, 2008.

 

($ in thousands, except per share data)    Months Ended
     January 31, 2007    January 31, 2008
     (unaudited)     

Consolidated Statements of Income Data:

     

Net revenues

   $ 34,554    $ 39,621

Net income

     6,483      13,607

Net income per basic and diluted common share

     6.48      13.61

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

     

Total assets

   $ 120,290    $ 152,368

Long-term debt, including current portion

     37,830      63,565

 

(2) Reflects combined federal and state income taxes on a pro forma basis, as if we had been taxed as a “C” Corporation, using an effective tax rate of approximately 40%.

 

(3) Our first full-price store opened in 2007. These data exclude our one outlet store as of May 1, 2010.

 

(4) Comparable-store sales are the net revenues of our stores that have been open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the period. Increase or decrease is reported as a percentage of the comparable-store sales for the same period in the prior fiscal year.

 

(5) Dollars not in thousands. Average net revenues per gross square foot are calculated by dividing total net revenues for our stores that have been open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the period by total gross square footage for those stores.

 

25


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and the information contained in other sections of this prospectus, particularly under the headings “Risk Factors,” “Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data” and “Business.” This discussion and analysis is based on the beliefs of our management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. The statements in this discussion and analysis concerning expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources, as well as other non-historical statements in this discussion and analysis, are forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements.” These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described under “Risk Factors.” Our actual results could differ materially from those suggested or implied by any forward-looking statements.

Overview

Vera Bradley is a leading designer, producer, marketer and retailer of stylish and highly-functional accessories for women. Our products include a wide offering of handbags, accessories and travel and leisure items. Over our 28-year history, Vera Bradley has become a true lifestyle brand that appeals to a broad range of consumers. Our brand vision is accessible luxury that inspires a casual, fun and family-oriented lifestyle. We have positioned our brand to highlight the high quality, distinctive and vibrant styling and functional design of our products. Frequent releases of new designs help keep the brand fresh and our customers continually engaged.

We generate revenues by selling products through two reportable segments: Indirect and Direct. As of May 1, 2010, our Indirect business consisted of sales of Vera Bradley products to approximately 3,300 independent retailers, substantially all of which are located in the U.S., as well as to select national retailers and independent e-commerce sites. As of May 1, 2010, our Direct business consisted of sales of Vera Bradley products through our 28 full-price stores, one outlet store, verabradley.com, and our annual outlet sale in Fort Wayne, Indiana. We began selling directly to consumers through verabradley.com in 2006 and we opened our first retail store in 2007.

Over the past five years, we have grown rapidly as a result of the successful implementation of strategic initiatives. These strategies included enhancing our merchandising strategy, establishing a multi-channel distribution sales model and expanding our supply chain capabilities, product development processes and information systems to improve operational flexibility and profitability. Over the last five years, our net revenues have grown from $120.7 million in calendar year 2005 to $288.9 million in fiscal year 2010, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 23.9%.

Due to the implementation of these key strategic initiatives, we experienced substantial growth in calendar years 2006 and 2007 as the Vera Bradley brand gained broader exposure in the marketplace. The introduction in 2006 of Java Blue, the best selling pattern in our history, also significantly influenced our growth during this period. We attribute the success of Java Blue to the pattern’s universal appeal across all demographic segments of our customer base and its ability to attract many consumers to the Vera Bradley brand for the first time. While sales of Java Blue patterned products contributed meaningfully to our growth in 2006 and 2007, the popularity of Java Blue also positively impacted the sales of our products in other Vera Bradley patterns during the same period. During this period, our net revenues grew from $120.7 million in calendar year 2005 to $281.1 million in calendar year 2007.

In fiscal year 2009, our net revenues declined $42.5 million, or 15.1%, as the economic environment weakened. In addition to softening consumer demand, our net revenues were negatively impacted by excess inventory levels held by our Indirect retailers at the end of calendar year 2007. Excess inventory levels resulted from the rapidly deteriorating economic environment following a period of increasing consumer demand for our products in 2006 and 2007 and the sharp increase in orders from our Indirect retailers following the introduction of our Java Blue pattern. In fiscal year 2009, during the challenging environment presented by the economic recession, we focused our efforts on managing our cost structure and reducing inventories while continuing to invest in our infrastructure to support future growth. As a result, in fiscal year 2009 our operating income decreased to $27.2 million.

 

26


Table of Contents

In fiscal year 2010, we experienced strong sales growth with net revenues of $288.9 million, an increase of 21.1% over fiscal year 2009, despite the continuing economic recession. This growth was driven by the impact of our strategic initiatives, including our expanding Direct business, the reduction of inventory levels in our Indirect channel that had occurred by the end of fiscal 2009 and increasing demand based on improving consumer confidence. In addition, fiscal year 2010 net revenues in both the Indirect and Direct segments benefited from the increased frequency of releases of our collections, as well as the expansion of our range of patterns. During the same period, operating income increased to $45.7 million, or 68.1%, primarily due to the increase in net revenues combined with operational and supply chain improvements that enhanced our gross margin and operating margin.

We believe there is a significant opportunity to grow our store base as we believe the market in the U.S. can support at least 300 Vera Bradley full-price stores. In fiscal year 2011, we plan to open nine full-price stores and three outlet stores.

Our full-price stores average approximately 1,900 square feet per store and we expect to invest approximately $0.3 million per new store, consisting of build-out costs less tenant allowances. New full-price stores are expected to generate on average between $0.9 million and $1.1 million in net revenues during the first twelve months and the payback on our investment generally occurs in less than two years. Typically, we have found that, as a new store becomes better integrated into its community and brand awareness grows, the store’s productivity tends to improve as measured by comparable-store sales, but we cannot assure you that full-price stores opened in the future will generate similar net revenues in the first twelve months or pay back our investment in a similar period.

We believe our business strategy will continue to offer significant opportunity, but it also presents risks and challenges. These risks and challenges include that we may not be able to effectively predict and respond to changing fashion trends and customer preferences, that we may not be able to find desirable locations for new stores and that we may not be able to effectively manage our future growth. Addressing these risks could divert our attention from continuing to build on the strengths that we believe have driven the growth of our business, but we believe our focus on brand identity, customer loyalty, a distinctive shopping experience, product development expertise and company culture will contribute positively to our results.

How We Assess the Performance of Our Business

In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a variety of performance and financial measures.

Net Revenues

Net Revenues.  Net revenues reflect revenues from the sale of our merchandise and revenues from distribution, shipping and handling fees, less returns and discounts. Revenues from the Indirect segment reflect revenues from sales to Indirect retailers. Revenues from the Direct segment reflect revenues from sales through our full-price and outlet stores, verabradley.com and our annual outlet sale in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

Comparable-Store Sales.  Comparable-store sales are calculated based upon our stores that have been open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the reporting period. Some of our competitors and other retailers calculate comparable or “same store” sales differently than we do. As a result, data in this prospectus regarding our comparable-store sales may not be comparable to similar data made available by other companies.

Measuring the change in year-over-year comparable-store sales allows us to evaluate how our store base is performing. Various factors affect our comparable-store sales, including:

 

  ¡  

Overall economic trends;

 

  ¡  

Consumer preferences and fashion trends;

 

27


Table of Contents
  ¡  

Competition;

 

  ¡  

The timing of our releases of new patterns and collections;

 

  ¡  

Changes in our product mix;

 

  ¡  

Pricing;

 

  ¡  

The level of customer service that we provide in stores;

 

  ¡  

Our ability to source and distribute products efficiently;

 

  ¡  

The number of stores we open and close in any period; and

 

  ¡  

The timing and success of promotional and advertising efforts.

Gross Profit

Gross profit is equal to our net revenues less our cost of sales. Gross margin measures gross profit as a percentage of our net revenues. Cost of sales includes the direct cost of purchased merchandise, manufactured merchandise, distribution center costs, operations overhead, duty and all inbound freight costs incurred. The components of our reported cost of sales may not be comparable to those of other retail and wholesale companies.

Prior to calendar year 2006, we sourced the majority of our finished products domestically. Today, the significant majority of our products are sourced internationally. During this same period, we began direct sourcing of our raw materials and brought management of logistics in-house. These sourcing changes, along with better cost management, contributed to improvements in gross margin over this period.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)

SG&A expenses fall into three categories: (1) selling; (2) advertising, marketing and product development; and (3) administrative. Selling expenses include Direct business expenses such as store expenses, employee compensation, store occupancy and supply costs, as well as Indirect business expenses primarily consisting of employee compensation and other expenses associated with sales to Indirect retailers. Advertising, marketing and product development expenses include employee compensation, media costs, creative production expenses, marketing agency fees, new product design costs, public relations expenses and market research expenses. A portion of our advertising expenses may be reimbursed by Indirect retailers and such amount is classified as other income. Administrative expenses include compensation costs for corporate functions, corporate headquarters occupancy costs, consulting and software expenses and charitable donations. SG&A expenses increase as the number of stores increases, but not in the same proportion.

Other Income

We support many of our Indirect retailers’ marketing efforts by distributing certain catalogs and promotional mailers to current and prospective customers. Our Indirect retailers reimburse us for a portion of the cost to produce these materials. Reimbursement received is recorded as other income. The related cost to design, produce and distribute the catalogs and mailers is recorded as SG&A expense.

State Income Taxes

Historically, we have elected to have our income taxed under Section 1362 of the Internal Revenue Code as an “S” Corporation. Section 1362 provides that, in lieu of corporate income taxes, the shareholders are taxed on our taxable income for federal tax purposes. Certain state and local taxing jurisdictions recognize the “S” Corporation status and tax our

 

28


Table of Contents

shareholders instead of us. The income tax provision represents state taxes that have been or will be paid by us related to the state and local taxing jurisdictions which do not recognize the “S” Corporation status and therefore tax us on our taxable income.

Basis of Presentation

In January 2008, we changed our fiscal year end from December 31 to the Saturday closest to January 31. Accordingly, references to fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 refer to the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively, and references to calendar year 2007 refer to the year ended December 31, 2007.

Results of Operations

The following tables summarize key components of our consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated, both in dollars and as a percentage of our net revenues.

 

($ in thousands)    Year Ended     Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal Quarters Ended  
       December 31,  

2007

      January 31,  
2009
      January 30,  
2010
    May 2,
2009
    May 1,
2010
 
                       (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Statement of Income Data:

          

Net revenues

   $ 281,085      $ 238,577      $ 288,940      $ 71,413      $ 85,002   

Cost of sales

     133,522        115,473        137,803        36,742        36,189   
                                        

Gross profit

     147,563        123,104        151,137        34,671        48,813   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     101,022        109,195        116,168        30,013        33,637   

Other income

     7,799        13,282        10,743        3,474        2,125   
                                        

Operating income

     54,340        27,191        45,712        8,132        17,301   

Interest expense, net

     2,924        2,511        1,604        632        308   
                                        

Income before state income taxes

     51,416        24,680        44,108        7,500        16,993   

State income taxes

     1,185        1,009        889        132        199   
                                        

Net income

   $ 50,231      $ 23,671      $ 43,219      $ 7,368      $ 16,794   
                                        
     Year Ended     Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal Quarters Ended  
     December 31,
2007
    January 31,
2009
    January 30,
2010
    May 2,
2009
    May 1,
2010
 
                       (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Percentage of Net Revenues:

          

Net revenues

     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0

Cost of sales

     47.5     48.4     47.7     51.5     42.6
                                        

Gross profit

     52.5     51.6     52.3     48.5     57.4

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     35.9     45.8     40.2     42.0     39.6

Other income

     2.8     5.6     3.7     4.9     2.5
                                        

Operating income

     19.3     11.4     15.8     11.4     20.4

Interest expense, net

     1.0     1.1     0.6     0.9     0.4
                                        

Income before state income taxes

     18.3     10.3     15.3     10.5     20.0

State income taxes

     0.4     0.4     0.3     0.2     0.2
                                        

Net income

     17.9     9.9     15.0     10.3     19.8
                                        

 

29


Table of Contents

The following tables present net revenues by operating segment, both in dollars and as a percentage of our net revenues, and full-price store data for the periods indicated.

 

($ in thousands)    Year Ended     Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal Quarters Ended  
     December 31,
2007
    January 31,
2009
    January 30,
2010
    May 2,
2009
    May 1,
2010
 
                       (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Net Revenues by Segment:

          

Indirect

   $ 243,388      $ 167,454      $ 192,829      $ 47,376      $ 54,174   

Direct

     37,697        71,123        96,111        24,037        30,828   
                                        

Total

   $ 281,085      $ 238,577      $ 288,940      $ 71,413      $ 85,002   
                                        
     Year Ended     Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal Quarters Ended  
     December 31,
2007
    January 31,
2009
    January 30,
2010
    May 2,
2009
    May 1,
2010
 
                       (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Percentage of Net Revenues by Segment:

          

Indirect

     86.6     70.2     66.7     66.3     63.7

Direct

     13.4     29.8     33.3     33.7     36.3
                                        

Total

     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0
                                        
($ in thousands, except as otherwise indicated)    Year Ended     Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal Quarters Ended  
     December 31,
2007
    January 31,
2009
    January 30,
2010
    May 2,
2009
    May 1,
2010
 
                       (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Full-Price Store Data:(1)

          

Total stores open at end of period

     7        21        26        22        28   

Comparable-store sales increase(2)

     —          8.0     36.4     33.8     22.3

Total gross square footage at end of period

     11,927        39,285        48,285        41,065        51,487   

Average net revenues per gross square foot(3)

     —        $ 578      $ 615        —          —     

 

(1) Our first full-price store was opened in 2007. These data exclude our one outlet store as of May 1, 2010.

 

(2) Comparable-store sales are the net revenues of our stores that have been open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the period. Increase or decrease is reported as a percentage of the comparable-store sales for the same period in the prior fiscal year.

 

(3) Dollars not in thousands. Average net revenues per gross square foot are calculated by dividing total net revenues for our stores that have been open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the period by total gross square footage for those stores.

Fiscal Quarter Ended May 1, 2010 Compared to Fiscal Quarter Ended May 2, 2009

Net Revenues

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, net revenues increased $13.6 million, or 19.0%, to $85.0 million, from $71.4 million in the comparable prior-year period.

Indirect.  For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, net revenues increased $6.8 million, or 14.4%, to $54.2 million, from $47.4 million in the comparable prior-year period, due primarily to increased sales volume to our Indirect retailers, driven in turn by improved economic conditions and increased consumer spending.

Direct.  For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, net revenues increased $6.8 million, or 28.3%, to $30.8 million, from $24.0 million in the comparable prior-year period. The increase resulted from a 23.7% increase in e-commerce revenues

 

30


Table of Contents

due primarily to greater traffic from marketing initiatives. In addition, the number of our stores grew from 22 at May 2, 2009 to 29 at May 1, 2010. The increase in net revenues also was attributable to comparable-store sales growth of 22.3% and a 10.4% improvement in annual outlet sale revenues. The improvement in outlet sale revenues resulted from an increase in the number of shoppers that attended the event and higher average product pricing at the sale.

Gross Profit

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, gross profit increased $14.1 million, or 40.8%, to $48.8 million, from $34.7 million in the comparable prior-year period. The gross margin was 57.4% versus 48.5% for the comparable prior-year period. The increase in gross margin was driven by improved efficiency of our operational expenses due to vertical integration and increased overseas sourcing as well as higher average product pricing at the annual outlet sale.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, SG&A expenses increased $3.6 million, or 12.1%, to $33.6 million, from $30.0 million in the comparable prior-year period. As a percentage of net revenues, SG&A expenses were 39.6% and 42.0% during the fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively. The decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues was due to an increase in net revenues without a comparable increase in SG&A expenses.

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, selling expenses increased $3.5 million, or 26.2%, to $17.0 million, from $13.5 million in the comparable prior-year period. As a percentage of net revenues, selling expenses were 20.0% and 18.9% during the fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively. The increase in selling expenses was due primarily to increased store operational costs attributable to new store openings, as well as increased travel and event expenses in our Indirect business.

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, advertising, marketing and product development expenses decreased $0.9 million, or 9.5%, to $8.3 million, from $9.2 million in the comparable prior-year period. As a percentage of net revenues, advertising, marketing and product development expenses were 9.8% and 12.8% during the fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively. The decrease was due primarily to a decline in the number of catalogs and direct mailers we produced as a result of lower participation by our Indirect retailers in these programs. This decline was offset by increased product development expenses as we expanded our product design capabilities with the addition of a New York design office in fiscal year 2010.

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, administrative expenses increased $1.0 million, or 13.1%, to $8.4 million, from $7.4 million in the comparable prior-year period. As a percentage of net revenues, administrative expenses were 9.8% in both fiscal quarters. The increase in administrative expenses was due primarily to increased professional service fees.

Other Income

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, other income declined $1.4 million, or 38.8%, to $2.1 million, from $3.5 million in the comparable prior-year period. The decrease was due to a decline in the participation by our Indirect retailers in our catalogs and direct mailers, which resulted in decreased reimbursement of our advertising expenses.

Interest Expense, Net

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, interest expense decreased $0.3 million, or 50.0%, to $0.3 million, from $0.6 million in the comparable prior-year period. This decrease was attributable to lower debt levels along with a lower cost of borrowing.

 

31


Table of Contents

Fiscal Year 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year 2009

Net Revenues

For fiscal year 2010, net revenues increased $50.4 million, or 21.1%, to $288.9 million, from $238.6 million for fiscal year 2009.

Indirect.  For fiscal year 2010, net revenues increased $25.4 million, or 15.2%, to $192.8 million, from $167.5 million for fiscal year 2009 due primarily to increased sales volume to our Indirect retailers. The volume increase resulted from improving economic conditions and increased consumer spending.

Direct.  For fiscal year 2010, net revenues increased $25.0 million, or 35.1%, to $96.1 million, from $71.1 million for fiscal year 2009. The increase resulted from a 48.9% increase in e-commerce revenues due primarily to greater traffic from marketing initiatives. In addition, the number of our stores grew from 21 at the end of fiscal year 2009 to 27 at the end of fiscal year 2010. The increase in net revenue was also attributable to comparable-store sales growth of 36.4%. These increases were offset by a decrease in annual outlet sale revenues, as we held two outlet sales in fiscal year 2009 rather than the traditional one outlet sale.

Gross Profit

For fiscal year 2010, gross profit increased $28.0 million, or 22.8%, to $151.1 million, from $123.1 million in the comparable prior-year period. The gross margin was 52.3% versus 51.6% for the comparable prior-year period. Gross margin improvement was attributable to increased revenues from our stores, better cost management in the Direct business, and improved profits from e-commerce related to fulfillment integration and better promotional pricing.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.

For fiscal year 2010, SG&A expenses increased $7.0 million, or 6.4%, to $116.2 million, from $109.2 million for fiscal year 2009. As a percentage of net revenues, SG&A expenses were 40.2% and 45.8% during fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2009, respectively. The decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues was due to an increase in net revenues without a comparable increase in SG&A expenses.

For fiscal year 2010, selling expenses increased $3.8 million, or 7.3%, to $55.2 million, from $51.4 million for fiscal year 2009. As a percentage of net revenues, selling expenses were 19.1% and 21.5% during fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2009, respectively. The increase in selling expenses was due primarily to increased depreciation related to the long-lived asset impairment for three of our stores, increased store operating costs related to the opening of six new stores in fiscal year 2010 and a full year of store operating costs related to the 14 full-price stores opened in fiscal year 2009.

For fiscal year 2010, advertising, marketing and product development expenses decreased $4.4 million, or 12.9%, to $29.9 million, from $34.3 million for fiscal year 2009. As a percentage of net revenues, advertising, marketing and product development expenses were 10.3% and 14.4% during fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2009, respectively. The decrease was due to a decline in the number of catalogs and direct mailers we produced as a result of lower participation by our Indirect retailers in these programs and a decrease in other advertising expenses.

As a percentage of net revenues, administrative expenses were 10.8% and 9.8% during fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2009, respectively. The increase in administrative expenses was due primarily to increased corporate infrastructure spending on personnel, owners life insurance, and a modest increase in charitable giving.

Other Income

For fiscal year 2010, other income decreased $2.5 million, or 19.1%, to $10.7 million, from $13.3 million for fiscal year 2009. The decrease was due to a decline in the participation by our Indirect retailers in our catalogs and direct mailers, which resulted in decreased reimbursement of our advertising expenses.

 

32


Table of Contents

Interest Expense, Net

For fiscal year 2010, interest expense decreased $0.9 million, or 36.1%, to $1.6 million, from $2.5 million for fiscal year 2009. This decrease was attributable to lower debt levels along with a lower cost of borrowing, offset by interest income received due to higher average cash balances.

Fiscal Year 2009 Compared to Calendar Year 2007

Net Revenues

For fiscal year 2009, net revenues decreased $42.5 million, or 15.1%, to $238.6 million, from $281.1 million for calendar year 2007.

Indirect.  For fiscal year 2009, net revenues decreased $75.9 million, or 31.2%, to $167.5 million, from $243.4 million for calendar year 2007, reflecting deteriorating economic conditions and corrections in Indirect retailer inventory levels built following strong product releases in 2007.

Direct.  For fiscal year 2009, net revenues increased $33.4 million, or 88.7%, to $71.1 million, from $37.7 million for calendar year 2007. The increase was a result of a 108.7% increase in e-commerce revenues due primarily to increased traffic from marketing initiatives and an increase in the number of our stores from seven at the end of calendar year 2007 to 21 at the end of fiscal year 2009. In addition, the increase in net revenues was attributable to an increase in comparable-store sales of 8.0%.

Gross Profit

For fiscal year 2009, gross profit decreased $24.5 million, or 16.6%, to $123.1 million, from $147.6 million for calendar year 2007. Gross margin was 51.6% in fiscal year 2009 and 52.5% in calendar year 2007. The decrease in gross profit was due to the decline in Indirect revenues, offset by increased volume from the Direct segment.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

For fiscal year 2009, SG&A expenses increased $8.2 million, or 8.1%, to $109.2 million, from $101.0 million for calendar year 2007. As a percentage of net revenues, SG&A expenses were 45.8% and 35.9% during fiscal year 2009 and calendar year 2007, respectively. The increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues was due to a decrease in net revenues without a comparable decrease in SG&A expenses.

For fiscal year 2009, selling expenses decreased $1.8 million, or 3.4%, to $51.4 million, from $53.2 million for calendar year 2007. As a percentage of net revenues, selling expenses were 21.5% and 18.9% during fiscal year 2009 and calendar year 2007, respectively. The decline in selling expenses was due primarily to a reduction in sales force compensation expense as the Indirect sales force was converted from independent contractors to an in-house sales organization. This decline was offset by costs associated with the opening of our first store in September 2007.

For fiscal year 2009, advertising, marketing and product development expenses increased $9.1 million, or 36.3%, to $34.3 million, from $25.2 million for calendar year 2007. As a percentage of net revenues, advertising, marketing and product development expenses were 14.4% and 9.0% during fiscal year 2009 and calendar year 2007, respectively. The increase in expense was due to an increase in the number of catalogs and direct mailers we produced as a result of greater participation by our Indirect retailers in these programs, as well as an increase in advertising directed at promoting brand awareness and encouraging consumer traffic to our stores.

For fiscal year 2009, administrative expenses increased $0.9 million, or 3.8%, to $23.5 million, from $22.6 million for calendar year 2007 due to increased employment costs offset by reduced use of professional services and consultants. As a percentage of net revenues, administrative expenses increased from 8.1% in calendar year 2007 to 9.8% in fiscal year 2009 due to the reduction in net revenues that we experienced in fiscal year 2009.

 

33


Table of Contents

Other Income

For fiscal year 2009, other income increased $5.5 million, or 70.3%, to $13.3 million, from $7.8 million in the comparable prior-year period. The increase was due to greater participation by our Indirect retailers in our catalogs and direct mailers, which resulted in increased reimbursement of our advertising expenses.

Interest Expense, Net

For fiscal year 2009, interest expense decreased $0.4 million, or 14.1%, to $2.5 million, from $2.9 million for calendar year 2007. Decreased interest expense was due to a lower cost of borrowing.

January 2008 Compared to January 2007

Net revenues for the month of January 2008 increased $5.1 million, or 14.7%, to $39.6 million from $34.6 million in January 2007.

Indirect.  For the month of January 2008, net revenues increased $3.6 million, or 10.6%, compared to the month of January 2007, driven primarily by strong initial sales of the spring 2008 product release.

Direct.  For the month of January 2008, net revenues increased $1.5 million, or 244.7%, compared to the month of January 2007 due primarily to an increase in e-commerce revenues and new store openings. During January 2008, we opened one new store, giving us a total of eight stores.

Operating income increased 110.9% to $14.1 million in January 2008 versus $6.7 million in January 2007. Operating margin increased to 35.5% versus 19.3% in the prior year. This margin improvement was due primarily to improved sourcing of raw materials and finished goods.

 

34


Table of Contents

Quarterly Operating Results

The following table sets forth selected data from our historical unaudited consolidated statements of income for each of the nine fiscal quarters in the period ended May 1, 2010, expressed in dollars and as a percentage of our annual results and net revenues. This unaudited quarterly information has been prepared on the same basis as our annual audited financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary to fairly present the financial information for the fiscal quarters presented.

The quarterly data should be read in conjunction with our audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

($ in thousands)   Fiscal Year 2009     Fiscal Year 2010     Fiscal
Year
2011
 
    First
Quarter
    Second
Quarter
    Third
Quarter
    Fourth
Quarter
    First
Quarter
    Second
Quarter
    Third
Quarter
    Fourth
Quarter
    First
Quarter
 
    (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Net revenues

  $ 53,256      $ 62,251      $ 58,394      $ 64,676      $ 71,413      $ 59,674      $ 72,752      $ 85,101      $ 85,002   

Gross profit

    26,937        35,626        24,966        35,575        34,670        29,567        39,878        47,022        48,813   

Operating income

    5,124        10,709        231        11,127        8,131        6,361        13,233        17,987        17,301   

Net income (loss)

    4,125        9,750        (431     10,227        7,368        5,794        12,766        17,291        16,794   

Percentage of Annual Results:

                 

Net revenues

    22.3     26.1     24.5     27.1     24.7     20.7     25.2     29.5     n/a   

Gross profit

    21.9     28.9     20.3     28.9     22.9     19.6     26.4     31.1     n/a   

Operating income

    18.8     39.4     0.9     40.9     17.8     13.9     28.9     39.3     n/a   

Net income (loss)

    17.4     41.2     (1.8 )%      43.2     17.0     13.4     29.5     40.0     n/a   

Percentage of Net Revenues:

                 

Net revenues

    100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0

Gross profit

    50.6     57.2     42.8     55.0     48.5     49.5     54.8     55.3     57.4

Operating income

    9.6     17.2     0.4     17.2     11.4     10.7     18.2     21.1     20.4

Net income (loss)

    7.7     15.7     (0.7 )%      15.8     10.3     9.7     17.5     20.3     19.8

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our business relies on cash flow from operating activities as our primary source of liquidity. We also have access to additional liquidity, if needed, through borrowings under our $60.0 million revolving credit facility. Historically, our primary cash needs have been for merchandise inventories, payroll, store rent, capital expenditures associated with opening new stores, debt repayments, operational equipment, information technology and quarterly shareholder distributions to cover estimated tax payments. The most significant components of our working capital are cash and cash equivalents, merchandise inventories, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities. We believe that cash flow from operating activities and the availability of borrowings under our existing credit facility or other financing arrangements will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures and scheduled debt payments for the foreseeable future.

 

35


Table of Contents

Cash Flow Analysis

A summary of operating, investing and financing activities is shown in the following table.

 

($ in thousands)   Year Ended     Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal Quarters Ended  
    December 31,
2007
    January 31,
2009
    January 30,
2010
    May 2,
2009
    May 1,
2010
 
                      (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

         

Net income

  $ 50,231      $ 23,671      $ 43,219      $ 7,368      $ 16,794   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

         

Depreciation and amortization

    4,657        7,347        10,666        2,192        2,043   

Changes in assets and liabilities

    (31,968     18,783        9,801        10,718        (15,302

Other

    1,408        386        2,320        139        149   
                                       

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $ 24,328      $ 50,187      $ 66,006      $ 20,417      $ 3,684   
                                       

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

         

Purchase of fixed assets

  $ (16,641   $ (14,949   $ (5,844   $ (490   $ (2,100

Deposit of restricted cash

    —          (1,500     —          —          —     
                                       

Net cash used in investing activities

  $ (16,641   $ (16,449   $ (5,844   $ (490   $ (2,100
                                       

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

         

Net borrowings (repayments), including bank overdrafts

  $ 34,246      $ (7,567   $ (24,500   $ (15,232   $ 6,563   

Repayment of vendor and related-party-financed debt

    (661     (304     (4,325     (251     (5

Net borrowings of long-term debt

         

Debt restructuring costs

    —          (1,024     —          —          —     

Payment of distributions

    (41,161     (24,119     (25,604     (2,866     (13,301
                                       

Net cash used in financing activities

  $ (7,576   $ (33,014   $ (54,429   $ (18,349   $ (6,743
                                       

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  $ 111      $ 724      $ 5,733      $ 1,578      $ (5,159

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period/year

    —          52        776        776        6,509   
                                       

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period/year

  $ 111      $ 776      $ 6,509      $ 2,354      $ 1,350   
                                       

Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities

Operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted for non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization, the effect of changes in assets and liabilities, and tenant allowances received from landlords under our store leases.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $66.0 million for fiscal year 2010 compared to $50.2 million in fiscal year 2009. In fiscal year 2010, net income increased $19.5 million from fiscal year 2009 while cash provided by changes in assets and liabilities declined $9.0 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $50.2 million for fiscal year 2009 compared to $24.3 million in calendar year 2007. In fiscal year 2009, we experienced lower net income, which was offset with cash provided by reductions in accounts receivable and inventories. Net cash provided by operating activities in calendar year 2007 was impacted by a buildup of inventories in late 2007.

 

36


Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operating activities declined in the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010 to $3.7 million compared to $20.4 million for the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2009. The increase in net income was more than offset by the build up of inventories to meet consumer demand.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Investing activities consist primarily of capital expenditures for growth related to new store openings, operational equipment, and information technology investments.

Net cash used in investing activities was $5.8 million in fiscal year 2010. This was driven by $3.6 million in investments in six new stores along with improvements in e-commerce, $0.4 million in information technology investments and $1.1 million in production and distribution equipment.

Net cash used in investing activities was $16.4 million in fiscal year 2009 driven by $7.2 million in investments in 13 new stores along with improvements in e-commerce, $1.9 million in information technology investments, $3.8 million in production and distribution equipment, with the remaining used for facility and other improvements.

Net cash used in investing activities was $16.6 million in calendar year 2007. This was driven by $5.2 million in investments in seven new stores along with improvements in e-commerce, $3.8 million in information technology investments and $5.6 million in distribution equipment and the completion of a new distribution center for which the majority of the costs were incurred in calendar year 2006.

For the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, we experienced a net use of cash for investing activities of $2.1 million as compared to $0.5 million for the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2009. Capital expenditures in the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010 were higher than capital expenditures in the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2009 due to investments in new stores, including the opening of two stores during the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010 compared to only one store during the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2009, and more stores under construction during the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010.

Capital expenditures during fiscal year 2011 are expected to be between $12.0 million and $15.0 million, the substantial majority of which will be devoted to the opening of new stores and enhancements to the distribution center.

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

Financing activities consist primarily of borrowings and repayments related to our term loan and revolving credit facility, as well as distributions to our shareholders and fees and expenses paid in connection with our credit facilities.

Net cash used in financing activities was $54.4 million in fiscal year 2010. This included $24.5 million in net repayments of borrowings under our credit facility, $4.3 million in repayments of vendor and related party debt and $25.6 million in distributions to our shareholders to fund tax liabilities due to our “S” Corporation status.

Net cash used in financing activities was $33.0 million in fiscal year 2009. This reflected net repayments of $7.6 million on our credit facility, $24.1 million of distributions to our shareholders to fund tax liabilities due to our “S” Corporation status and $1.0 million in expenses paid in connection with the credit facility.

Net cash used in financing activities was $7.6 million in calendar year 2007. The calendar year 2007 amount decreased due to a higher level of borrowings under our credit facility offset by distributions to shareholders.

Net cash used in financing activities was $6.7 million for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010, driven by $6.6 million in net borrowings under our credit facility and $13.3 million of distributions to our shareholders to fund tax liabilities due to our “S” Corporation status. For the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2009, net cash used in financing activities was $18.3 million primarily due to $15.2 million in net repayments of our credit facility and $2.9 million of shareholder distributions to fund tax liabilities.

 

37


Table of Contents

Credit Facility

On November 26, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement, which provides for a revolving credit commitment of $60.0 million, due November 26, 2011, and a term commitment of $15 million, due in quarterly installments of $1.25 million which began on March 31, 2009. All of our borrowings under the credit agreement are collateralized by a first priority interest in substantially all of our assets, including our intellectual property, and are guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries.

The agreement requires that we comply with quarterly financial covenants related to our consolidated net worth, leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio. We have been in compliance with these covenants for all periods presented.

At the end of fiscal year 2010, we had borrowed $20 million as a revolving loan and $10 million as a term loan. Interest rates fluctuate based on LIBOR or Prime plus a spread ranging from 2.5% to 3.5%. The interest rates on our borrowings were 3.0% at January 30, 2010 and 3.5% at January 31, 2009.

Credit availability under the revolving credit commitment to us is subject to a monthly borrowing base calculation. The borrowing base includes 80% of our consolidated net accounts receivable and 50% of our consolidated inventory, adjusted for certain components and subject to an inventory cap of $39 million. The available credit as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 under this arrangement was approximately $40.0 million and $20.5 million, respectively.

Contractual Obligations

We enter into long term contractual obligations and commitments in the normal course of business, primarily debt obligations and non-cancellable operating leases. As of January 30, 2010, our contractual cash obligations over the next several periods are set forth below.

 

($ in thousands)    Payments Due by Period
     Total    Less Than 1
Year
   1 - 3 Years    3 - 5 Years    More Than
5 Years

Debt to financial institutions(1)

   $ 30,000    $ 5,000    $ 25,000      —        —  

Debt to others(2)

     136      22      49      57      8

Operating Leases(3)

     48,036      7,090      11,229      10,925      18,792

Purchase Obligations(4)

     40,620      40,620      —        —        —  
                                  

Total

   $ 118,792    $ 52,732    $ 36,278    $ 10,982    $ 18,800
                                  

 

(1) As of January 30, 2010, we had the following principal amounts due under our syndicated credit agreement: $20,000,000 on our revolving loan due November 26, 2011 and $10,000,000 on our term loan due in quarterly installments of $1,250,000 that started on March 31, 2009. An estimated total interest amount of $1,355,833 based upon interest rates in effect on such indebtedness as of January 30, 2010 has been excluded.

 

(2) We entered into agreements with vendors for the financing of certain software licensing agreements. The amounts listed represent the outstanding balance to the vendors under these agreements.

 

(3) Our store leases generally have initial lease terms of 10 years and include renewal options upon substantially the same terms and conditions as the original leases.

 

(4) Purchase obligations consist primarily of inventory purchase orders.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance-sheet financing or unconsolidated special purpose entities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as the related

 

38


Table of Contents

disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We evaluate our accounting policies, estimates and judgments on an on-going basis. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

We evaluate the development and selection of our critical accounting policies and estimates and believe that the following involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity and are most significant to reporting our results of operations and financial position, and are therefore discussed as critical. The following critical accounting policies reflect the significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. With respect to critical accounting policies, even a relatively minor variance between actual and expected experience can potentially have a materially favorable or unfavorable impact on subsequent results of operations. However, our historical results for the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements have not been materially impacted by such variances. More information on all of our significant accounting policies can be found in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from the sale of our products are recognized upon customer receipt of the product when collection of relevant receivables is reasonably assured, pervasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed and determinable and ownership and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer which, for e-commerce and Indirect retailers, reflects an estimate of shipments that have not yet been received by the customer. The estimate of these shipments is based on shipping terms and historical delivery times. Significant changes in shipping terms or delivery times could materially impact our revenues in a given period.

We reserve for projected merchandise returns based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. Merchandise returns are often resalable merchandise and in the Direct business are refunded by issuing the same payment tender of the original purchase and in the Indirect business the customer is issued a credit to its account to apply to outstanding invoices. Merchandise exchanges of the same product and price are not considered merchandise returns and, therefore, are not included in the population when calculating the sales returns reserve. Product returns are often resalable through our annual outlet sale or other channels. Additionally, we reserve for other potential product credits and for customer shipments not yet received. The total reserve for returns, customer shipments not yet received, and general credits was $1.9 million and $1.7 million at January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. This represents a net loss to operating income of $1.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Market is determined based on net realizable value which includes cost to dispose. Appropriate consideration is given to obsolescence, excess quantities, and other factors including the popularity of a pattern or product in evaluating net realizable value. We record adjustments to our inventories, which are reflected in cost of sales, if the cost of specific inventory items on hand exceeds the amount we expect to realize from the ultimate sale or disposal of the inventory. This adjustment calculation requires us to make assumptions and estimates, which are based on factors such as merchandise seasonality, historical trends, and estimated inventory levels, including sell-through of remaining units. Inventory reserves of $7.5 million and $5.3 million were recorded for these matters as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. Inventory reserves are primarily for estimated raw materials of discontinued patterns as we have the ability to move discontinued finished goods through a number of channels including the annual outlet sale, our outlet stores, and through liquidators as needed. Annually, at fiscal year end, we conduct a physical inventory as well as periodic cycle counts throughout the year.

Income Taxes

Historically, we have recognized income taxes as an “S” Corporation for federal income tax purposes. As such, with the exception of a limited number of state and local jurisdictions, we are not subject to income taxes. The shareholders of the

 

39


Table of Contents

company, and not the company itself, are subject to income tax on their distributive share of our earnings. We pay distributions to the shareholders to fund their tax obligations attributable to taxable income of our company. Upon completion of the offering, we will automatically convert to a “C” Corporation.

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Financial Interpretation (“FIN”) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (codified primarily in ASC 740), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (codified primarily in ASC 740). ASC 740 provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of ASC 740 and in subsequent periods. This interpretation also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

We adopted FIN 48 effective February 1, 2009. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we did not recognize any change in liability for income taxes.

Valuation of Long-lived Assets

Property and equipment assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In evaluating an asset for recoverability, we estimate the future cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset at the store level, the lowest identifiable level of cash flow, if applicable. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset is less than the carrying value, we recognize a loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted cash flow analysis of the asset. Factors used in the valuation of long-lived assets include, but are not limited to, our plans for future operations, brand initiatives, recent operating results, and projected future cash flows. Impairment charges are included in SG&A expenses.

The discounted cash flow models used to estimate the applicable fair values involve numerous estimates and assumptions that are highly subjective. Changes to these estimates and assumptions could materially impact the fair value estimates. The estimates and assumptions critical to the overall fair value estimates include: (1) estimated future cash flow generated at the store level; and (2) discount rates used to derive the present value factors used in determining the fair values. These and other estimates and assumptions are impacted by economic conditions and our expectations and may change in the future based on period-specific facts and circumstances. If economic conditions were to deteriorate, future impairment charges may be required.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2009, the FASB released the authoritative version of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. The FASB ASC supersedes all existing accounting standard documents recognized by the FASB. All other accounting literature not included in the FASB ASC is considered non-authoritative. The FASB ASC is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ended after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the FASB ASC had no impact on our consolidated financial position, statements of income or cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued a statement which requires disclosures of how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We adopted this statement as of February 1, 2009.

 

40


Table of Contents

In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance which defines and establishes the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity evaluates transactions and events for potential disclosure in the financial statements in addition to disclosing the date through which such events have been evaluated. The guidance was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods ended after June 15, 2009 and was applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, statement of income or cash flows. We have evaluated subsequent events through June 1, 2010, which is the date on which our financial statements for fiscal year 2010 were available to be issued.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure of Market Risks

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with borrowings under our credit facilities, which bear interest at variable rates.

From time to time, we utilize interest rate swaps to economically hedge our interest rate risk. These swaps are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. We entered into two interest rate swap agreements in fiscal year 2010, swapping the variable LIBOR-based interest rate on our existing credit facility with a fixed rate ranging from .79% to 1.20%. We had marked these swaps to market, resulting in a liability of $89,000 at January 30, 2010. We had no open derivative instruments at January 31, 2009. The open interest rate swap agreements cover an aggregate notional amount of $20 million, $10 million of which expires on February 2, 2011 and $10 million of which expired on February 2, 2010. As of January 30, 2010, a 1% change in interest rates would have resulted in an approximate incremental $109,000 gain or loss related to this arrangement.

Impact of Inflation

Our results of operations and financial condition are presented based on historical cost. While it is difficult to accurately measure the impact of inflation due to the imprecise nature of the estimates required, we believe the effects of inflation, if any, on our results of operations and financial condition have been immaterial.

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

We source a substantial majority of our materials from various suppliers in China and South Korea. Substantially all purchases and sales involving foreign persons are denominated in U.S. dollars and therefore we do not hedge using any derivative instruments. Historically, we have not been impacted materially by changes in exchange rates.

 

41


Table of Contents

BUSINESS

Our Company

Vera Bradley is a leading designer, producer, marketer and retailer of stylish and highly-functional accessories for women. Our products include a wide offering of handbags, accessories and travel and leisure items. Over our 28-year history, Vera Bradley has become a true lifestyle brand that appeals to a broad range of consumers. Our brand vision is accessible luxury that inspires a casual, fun and family-oriented lifestyle. We have positioned our brand to highlight the high quality, distinctive and vibrant styling and functional design of our products. Frequent releases of new designs help keep the brand fresh and our customers continually engaged.

Our recent growth reflects the expanding demographic appeal of our brand and product offerings. Our customers span generations and include young girls, teens, college students, young professionals, mothers and grandmothers. Our broad product offerings enable our customers to express their personal style in all aspects of their lives, whether at the beach, a weekend getaway, school or work.

We generate net revenues by selling products through two reportable segments: Indirect and Direct. As of May 1, 2010, our Indirect business consisted of sales of Vera Bradley products to approximately 3,300 independent retailers, substantially all of which are located in the U.S., as well as select national retailers and third party e-commerce sites. As of May 1, 2010, our Direct business consisted of sales of Vera Bradley products through our 28 full-price stores, our one outlet store, verabradley.com, and our annual outlet sale in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

Over the last five years, our net revenues have grown from $120.7 million in calendar year 2005 to $288.9 million in fiscal year 2010, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 23.9%. In 2007, we opened our first full-price Vera Bradley store and have experienced meaningful growth in our Direct business, growing our store base to 28 full-price stores as of May 1, 2010. Our full-price stores produced comparable-store sales of 36.4% in fiscal year 2010 and 22.3% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. In addition, we have experienced strong sales growth in our e-commerce business in recent years.

Our History

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia Miller founded the company in 1982 in Fort Wayne, Indiana, after recognizing a lack of stylish travel accessories in the market. Within weeks, the friends created Vera Bradley, named after Barbara’s mother, and began manufacturing and marketing their distinctive products. The founders, together with the executive management team, have been instrumental in our growth and success. The following sets forth a summary of significant milestones in Vera Bradley’s history:

1982 – Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia Miller launched Vera Bradley by introducing three products: the

handbag, the sports bag and the duffel bag.

1987 – We relocated to our current headquarters in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Ernst & Young honored our Co-Founders

with an “Entrepreneur of the Year” award.

1991 – To accommodate the increasing number of attendees, we relocated our annual outlet sale from a tent in

our parking lot to its present location at the Allen County Memorial Coliseum in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

1998 – We founded our primary philanthropy, the Vera Bradley Foundation for Breast Cancer.

1999 – Our products were being sold in all 50 states through Indirect retailers.

2005 – We launched the Vera Bradley Visual Merchandising Program, providing retailers a framework for

presenting the brand and merchandising our products in a consistent manner. In addition, we launched a series of strategic initiatives to build a foundation for future growth.

 

42


Table of Contents

2006 – We launched our e-commerce business through our website, verabradley.com.

2007 – We opened a state-of-the-art warehouse and distribution facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana. We also opened

our first store at the Natick Collection, in greater Boston, and opened six additional stores.

2008 – We transitioned from using an independent sales force to a sales force comprised entirely of in-house, full-

time employees. We opened fourteen additional stores.

2009 – We opened five additional stores and our first outlet store at Chicago Premium Outlets in Aurora, Illinois.

2010 – We opened a design office in New York City.

As of May 1, 2010, we sold our products through more than 3,300 Indirect retailers and 29 stores. In addition, we had more than 23 million visits to verabradley.com in fiscal year 2010 and attracted more than 65,000 attendees to our 2010 annual outlet sale.

The passion for design and customer service established by our founders, Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia R. Miller, has driven our growth over the past 28 years and remains the cornerstone of Vera Bradley today. As Chief Creative Officer, Ms. Bradley Baekgaard continues to play a role in the team responsible for our day-to-day creative functions, including product development and store design. As our National Spokesperson, Ms. Miller continues to play a role representing the brand at events, business and community functions and philanthropic activities.

We place a strong emphasis on social responsibility, developed from the core beliefs of our founders. In 1998, we founded our primary philanthropy, the Vera Bradley Foundation for Breast Cancer, which historically has received support from the sale of certain Vera Bradley “pink” handbags, luggage and accessories. To date, the Vera Bradley Foundation has contributed more than $10 million to breast cancer research.

Evolution of Our Business

Beginning in 2005, we embarked on a series of strategic initiatives designed to take advantage of the growing interest in the Vera Bradley brand. These initiatives were designed to strengthen and enhance our business and operating model, expand our demographic and geographic market opportunity and position us for future growth. The core components of these initiatives include the following:

Merchandising Strategy.  To appeal to a broader range of consumers, we developed a mix of pattern and product offerings specifically targeted at different consumer demographics, refined our product release strategy to significantly expand our product portfolio and increased the number of new patterns released as well as the frequency of new product launches. In addition, we substantially enhanced our visual merchandising strategy, focusing on a consistent presentation of Vera Bradley as a lifestyle brand.

Multi-Channel Distribution Capability.  In 2006, we initiated a Direct channel strategy that was designed to expand our brand presence and broaden our consumer demographic while complementing the growing Indirect channel of our business. The first step in establishing the Direct channel of our business was selling directly to consumers through verabradley.com beginning in 2006. In 2007, we opened our first full-price store. In fiscal year 2010, we had more than 23 million visits to verabradley.com, and as of May 1, 2010, we had 28 full-price stores and one outlet store.

Infrastructure Investment.  Beginning in 2005, we made a series of investments to strengthen our supply chain capabilities, information systems and product development processes, resulting in substantial cost savings and a more flexible and scalable operating structure. During this period, we shifted our production from a primarily domestic manufacturing model to a more cost-effective global sourcing platform. In 2007, we opened a state-of-the-art warehouse and distribution facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

 

43


Table of Contents

Our Brand

Over 28 years, we have created, developed and solidified a true lifestyle brand that resonates with a broad range of female consumers. Our brand vision is accessible luxury that inspires a casual, fun and family-oriented lifestyle. Actual employees, family and friends are often depicted throughout our advertising in fun, friendly and family-oriented settings, accentuating our brand image in an authentic manner. Our visual merchandising strategy, particularly in our full-price stores, seeks to create the feeling of home. We believe that our lifestyle brand is well positioned to extend into complementary product categories. The strength of our brand is demonstrated during our annual outlet sale in Fort Wayne, Indiana, a sales event that attracts tens of thousands of highly enthusiastic shoppers from across the country each year.

We have positioned our brand to highlight the high quality, distinctive and vibrant styling and functional design of our products. At the same time, our frequent releases of new patterns and styles keep the brand fresh, inspire our customers to express their individuality and sense of style in a colorful way and encourage multiple purchases. We also provide consumers a consistently fresh set of patterns, styles and products to choose from that fit with different ages, wardrobes, seasons and personalities.

We also offer a broad assortment of products that meet our customers’ different functional needs, including: handbags such as purses, totes and specialty bags; accessories such as wallets, ID cases and eyewear; and travel and leisure items such as weekend bags, duffel bags and garment bags. We believe this combination of patterns, styles and products allows us to appeal to teens, young women, mothers and grandmothers. Although our customers draw from a broad range of demographic segments, our market research has shown that they generally have a common attitude toward the brand: Vera Bradley is a colorful way of allowing them to express their individuality and sense of style.

Industry Overview

Mintel, a provider of research in the apparel and accessories industry, published a report in May 2009 discussing the U.S. handbag industry. Mintel defines “handbags” as any type of bag or satchel that is capable of being carried either by hand or over the shoulder. According to the Mintel study, the industry has grown at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 4.2% since 2004 and is expected to generate over $6.7 billion in sales during 2010.

The Mintel study found that female consumers view handbags as essential accessories and many purchase handbags to fit different outfits or occasions in their lives. Due to the consumer’s continually evolving collection of handbags, the average number of handbags owned by a survey sample of 1,020 women over 18 years of age was 9.8 as of February 2009. Young adults (18-24 year old) are a growing consumer segment in the handbag industry and purchase, on average, 2.3 handbags on an annual basis, more than any other age bracket. The 25-34 year old sub-segment of this population is expected to grow 13.3% between 2009 and 2014, which should further drive increased demand in the industry. The 35-44 year old category reported the second highest frequency of purchases with, on average, 2.1 handbags purchased per year.

Brick-and-mortar stores currently account for a significant portion of the distribution in the handbag market. However, the online marketplace is becoming an increasingly popular venue for handbag sales. It has become more important to women to research product specifications and pricing in advance. There is also a growing trend of consumers using social networking sites to share product knowledge and recommendations of different brands. Nonetheless, we believe consumers continue to frequent retail stores to see and touch the product and because they find shopping for handbags in retail stores an entertaining activity.

Both the fashion accessories and luggage markets are large and highly fragmented. Packaged Facts, a leading publisher of market research in the consumer products industry, published a report in January 2009 estimating the market for fashion accessories to be approximately $16.3 billion in 2008. The accessories market is particularly broad, encompassing products such as belts, scarves, leather goods and gloves. IBISWorld, a provider of market research, estimated in a January 2010 report that the current luggage market is approximately $1.7 billion.

We have a small but growing assortment of products in the fashion accessories and luggage markets and believe there is an opportunity for Vera Bradley to capture additional market share as we leverage our strong brand appeal to expand into additional product categories.

 

44


Table of Contents

Competitive Strengths

We believe the following competitive strengths differentiate us within the marketplace and provide a strong foundation for our future growth:

Strong Brand Identity and Positioning.  We believe the Vera Bradley brand is highly recognized for its distinctive and vibrant style. Vera Bradley is positioned in the market as a lifestyle brand that inspires consumers to express their individuality and sense of style. We have also positioned our brand to highlight the high quality and functional attributes of our products. The Vera Bradley brand is more accessible than many competing brands, which allows us to attract a wide range of consumers and inspire repeat purchases.

Exceptional Customer Loyalty.  We believe that, as consumers become familiar with the Vera Bradley brand and begin using our products, they become loyal and enthusiastic brand advocates. We believe enthusiasm for our brand inspires repeat purchases and helps us expand our customer base. Our customers often purchase our products as gifts for family and friends, who, in turn, become loyal customers.

Product Development Expertise.  Our product development team combines an understanding of consumer preferences with a knowledge of color, fashion and style trends to design our products. Our highly creative design associates utilize a disciplined product design process that seeks to maximize the productivity of our product releases and drive consumer demand.

Dynamic Multi-Channel Distribution Model.  We offer our products through a diverse choice of shopping options across channels that are intimate, highly shop-able, fun and characteristic of our brand. Whether at a Vera Bradley store, an independent specialty retail store or verabradley.com, we believe consumers have an opportunity to find the brand in places that match their unique shopping interests. Our multi-channel distribution model enables us to maximize brand exposure and customer access to our products.

Established Network of Indirect Retailers.  Our Indirect business consists of an established and diverse network of over 3,300 independent retailers. This channel of gift, apparel and accessories, travel and specialty retailers, located throughout the U.S., provides a strong foundation for our growth. Our Indirect retailers include some of the brand’s strongest advocates and their passion has been instrumental in the development of our brand.

Distinctive Retail Stores.  Our stores provide a shopping experience that is uniquely “Vera Bradley.” We bring the Vera Bradley brand to life in our stores through visual presentation of our wide range of product offerings, the stylish, inviting décor of our stores and personalized service from our friendly and knowledgeable sales associates. We believe the distinctive shopping experience and personalized service encourage repeat visits and multiple purchases.

Unique Company Culture.  We were founded in 1982 by two friends, Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia Miller, who built our company around their passion for design and commitment to customer service. We believe our founders created a unique company culture that attracts passionate and motivated employees who are excited about our products and our brand. Our employees share our founders’ commitment to Vera Bradley customers. We believe that a fun, friendly and welcoming work environment fosters creativity and collaboration and that, by empowering our employees to become personally involved in product design, testing and marketing, they become passionate and devoted brand advocates.

Experienced Management Team.  Our senior management team led by Michael C. Ray, our Chief Executive Officer, has extensive experience across a diverse range of disciplines in product design, merchandising, marketing, store development, supply chain management and finance. The current management team has been instrumental in the development and execution of our long-term strategies.

 

45


Table of Contents

Growth Strategies

We believe there are significant opportunities to expand our business and increase our net revenues and net income through the execution of the following growth strategies:

Grow in Underpenetrated U.S. Markets.  Our historic growth focused primarily on the eastern U.S., and accordingly the Vera Bradley brand is most recognized in that region. In recent years, we have successfully expanded our Indirect and Direct channels in key developing markets in the midwest and southwest. We believe the success of our expansion efforts is a testament to the strength and portability of our brand and the power of our multi-channel distribution capabilities. We intend to rely on these strengths to further penetrate our existing markets and successfully expand both Direct and Indirect channels of our business into relatively underpenetrated markets in the midwest, southwest and west.

Expand Our U.S. Store Base.  We plan to expand our retail presence in the U.S. by opening new stores. We believe that the market in the U.S. can support at least 300 Vera Bradley full-price stores. We plan to open nine full-price stores and three outlet stores over the course of fiscal year 2011.

Drive Comparable-Store Sales and Our E-Commerce Business.  We have several ongoing initiatives to drive comparable-store sales growth, including focusing on store-level merchandising programs and enhancing in-store customer service and selling capabilities. As a key element of our Direct channel strategy, we will continue to grow our e-commerce business through focused marketing efforts, online merchandising initiatives and social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. We believe our retail and e-commerce businesses are complementary and facilitate frequent contact with our customers.

Expand Our Product Offerings.  We design products to “accessorize a woman’s life” and believe this core competence serves as a platform for growth within and beyond our current product lines. We have expanded our product offerings to include new line extensions, such as our “Vera Vera” microfiber collection, and brand extensions, such as our recently launched paper and stationery collection. We believe that opportunities exist to “accessorize a woman’s life” through complementary product collections that fit within our positioning as a lifestyle brand.

Our Product Release Strategy

We introduce new patterns seasonally, four times per year. Within each season, we generally introduce three to five patterns. These patterns are incorporated into the designs of a wide range of products, including handbags, accessories and travel and leisure items, that are part of the core seasonal release. These products, which constitute our “Signature Collection” each season, can be classic styles, updates to older designs or new product introductions.

After each seasonal launch, we release additional new collections, typically once per month throughout the season. These collections often utilize or are inspired by that season’s patterns (e.g., the paper and gift collection in a new pattern), but a few of our releases are separate from the Signature Collection (e.g., the Vera Vera collection in solid colors).

We have increased the number of patterns per Signature release as well as the frequency of subsequent releases over time and believe that the assortment, breadth and cadence allow us to reach a broader range of consumer demographics and needs. We believe this keeps consumers continually engaged with our brand and repeatedly shopping at our points of distribution. In addition, we believe this approach allows us to minimize the risk associated with a single pattern not performing to our expectations. In order to keep our assortment current and fresh and to focus our inventory investments on our best performers, we discontinue patterns from time to time. We sell our remaining inventory of discontinued products at our annual outlet sale and through our outlet store.

 

46


Table of Contents

Our Products

The chart below presents net revenues generated by each of our three product categories and other revenues during the periods indicated as a percentage of our net revenues.

 

     Fiscal Years Ended     Fiscal  Quarter
Ended
May 1,
2010
 
     January 30,
2009
    January 31,
2010
   
     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Handbags

   54.3   52.4   51.4

Accessories

   32.0   31.7   33.9

Travel and Leisure Items

   9.9   11.1   9.1

Other(1)

   3.8   4.8   5.6
                  

Total

   100.0   100.0   100.0
                  

 

(1) Primarily includes merchandising, freight, promotional products and licensing revenues.

Handbags. Handbags are a core part of our product offerings and are the primary component of every Signature collection. The category consists of classic and new styles developed by our product development team to meet consumer demand and drive repeat purchases. Our handbag product category extends beyond handbags to include totes and specialty bags such as baby bags, backpacks and laptop portfolios. Handbags play a prominent role in our visual merchandising and we focus on showcasing the different patterns, colors and features of each bag. Our handbags are generally priced between $25 and $125.

Accessories. Accessories, our second largest revenues category, includes fashion accessories such as wallets, ID cases, eyeglass cases, cosmetics, paper and gift products and eyewear. Accessories are attractively priced, generally between $10 and $35, and allow the consumer to include some color in her wardrobe, even if tucked into another bag. Our product development team is consistently updating the accessories assortment based on consumer demand and fashion trends.

Travel and Leisure Items. Our travel and leisure product category includes duffel bags, garment bags and travel accessories, such as travel cosmetic cases. The first Vera Bradley product offering included duffel bags, which have consistently been a strong performer. We believe their popularity, as well as the appeal of our other travel and leisure items, results from our vibrant designs, functional styles and lightweight fabrications. Our travel and leisure prices generally range from $15 travel accessories to $130 soft luggage.

 

Product Development

We have implemented a fully integrated and cross-functional product development process that aligns design, market research, merchandise management, sales, marketing and sourcing. Product development is a core capability that makes our products unique and provides us with a competitive advantage. Our designs and aesthetics set our products apart and drive customer loyalty. Our product development team mixes an understanding of the needs of our target customers with knowledge of upcoming color and fashion trends to design new collections as well as new product categories that will resonate in the market.

We begin the development stage of our products in the Vera Bradley portfolio 12-18 months in advance of their release. The development of each new pattern includes the design of an overall print, a complementary fabric backing and three sizes of coordinating trim materials. To seek fresh perspectives, we collaborate with independent designers to create unique patterns for each season. We oversee the development and exercise the final approval of all patterns and designs. Once developed, we copyright each pattern, including the print, fabric backing and coordinating trim. We believe that great design is not only central to our product development efforts, but also is a fundamental part of our brand development and growth strategies. In the past several years, we have made investments to evolve and integrate our product development expertise, including opening a design office in New York City.

 

47


Table of Contents

Our product development team is also responsible for assortment planning, pricing, forecasting, promotional development and product lifecycle management. In addition, the team assures that we offer a broad range of patterns, fabrics, styles and functionality features in a cost-effective manner. We believe that, with our cross-functional, collaborative approach, we are able to introduce and sell our merchandise in a way that clearly communicates the Vera Bradley brand and the Vera Bradley lifestyle.

Marketing

We believe that the growth of our brand and our business is influenced by our ability to introduce and sell our merchandise in a way that clearly conveys the Vera Bradley lifestyle. We use marketing and advertising as critical tools in our efforts to promote our brand. As of May 1, 2010, we employed 26 in-house marketing personnel and contracted for additional outside support.

Catalogs and Collateral. The seasonal Vera Bradley catalog is a key vehicle for the brand and our product portfolio. Each season’s catalog is sent to a targeted customer mailing list. In addition to the catalog, we produce a number of other marketing pieces, or “collateral,” including postcards, gift guides, in-store signage and release-focused mailers. Catalogs and collateral provide consumers with a powerful visual representation of both the products and lifestyle images embodied by the Vera Bradley brand. We believe that Vera Bradley’s catalogs and other mailed collateral generate excitement and awareness about the brand and seasonal introductions and allow us to reach both new and loyal customers in their homes.

Advertising. We employ print and outdoor advertising to increase overall brand awareness. Our advertisements are primarily placed in national magazines that have a readership similar to our target demographics. These publications have recently included Seventeen, InStyle, O the Oprah Magazine and Real Simple. We continually assess our advertising strategies and tactics.

Public Relations and Product Placement. Vera Bradley has received considerable exposure in the press, including in publications such as InStyle, O the Oprah Magazine, Good Housekeeping, Coastal Living and The New York Times. In addition, we have expanded our marketing efforts to promote product placement in feature-length films and on prime-time television shows such as Desperate Housewives, Brothers and Sisters, Entourage and Modern Family.

Social Media and Online Marketing. In recent years, we have greatly increased traffic to verabradley.com and have increased awareness of our brand through online marketing and social networking sites. We have captured more than 900,000 customer email addresses in our online customer file, with many of these customers providing age, occupation and location data. This captured information provides us with deeper insight into the products and categories that are in the highest demand and allows us to better target our customers with appropriate messages. As of May 1, 2010, we had over 225,000 Facebook fans and a growing number of Twitter followers. We believe these media not only connect us with our fans, but also allow us to target them through cross-channel marketing.

Channels of Distribution

We distribute our merchandise through Indirect and Direct channels. This multi-channel distribution model not only enables us to have operational flexibility, but also maximizes the methods by which we can access potential customers.

Indirect Channel. As of May 1, 2010, we had approximately 3,300 Indirect retailers, the majority of which are independent retailers with whom we have long-standing relationships. In calendar year 2007, fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, our Indirect channel generated net revenues of $243.4 million, $167.5 million and $192.8 million, respectively, or, as a percentage of net revenues, 86.6%, 70.2% and 66.7%, respectively. Indirect retailers are primarily gift, apparel and accessories, travel or other specialty retailers. No single account represented more than 2.0% of total Indirect net revenues in fiscal year 2010, with the top ten accounts representing less than 10.0% of total net revenues. The majority of our Indirect retailers have been customers for over five years.

 

48


Table of Contents

Direct Channel

Full-Price Stores. We have developed a retail presence through our full-price stores, all located in the U.S., which provides us with a format to showcase the image and products of Vera Bradley. Our full-price stores average 1,900 square feet per store and are designed to create a feeling of home with a high standard of visual merchandising. The welcoming nature of our full-price stores provides our customers with a comfortable shopping experience in a setting that showcases our merchandise and conveys the Vera Bradley lifestyle. Our sales associates are passionate about our products and customer service, which, we believe, translates into a superior shopping experience.

E-Commerce. In 2006, we began selling our products through the verabradley.com website. The objective of verabradley.com is to provide both a mechanism for marketing directly to consumers and a storefront where consumers can find the entire Vera Bradley collection. In fiscal year 2010, we invested in upgrades to our website, which enables us to provide customized shopping experiences tailored to each online shopper and allows better integration with third-party sites such as Facebook.com. We believe the enhanced functionality allows us to provide a superior experience to our e-commerce customers. In fiscal year 2010, we had over 23 million visits to verabradley.com.

Outlet Store. As of May 1, 2010, we operated one outlet store, located in Aurora, Illinois. Our outlet store is a vehicle for selling discontinued merchandise at discounted prices while maintaining brand identity. No products are designed specifically for the outlet store. We believe our outlet store is an integral part of our distribution strategy as this format provides an additional channel of distribution for our products and enables us to better target value-oriented customers.

Annual Outlet Sale. For the last ten years, our annual outlet sale has been held in the Memorial Coliseum Exposition Center in Fort Wayne, Indiana. The annual outlet sale is an important tradition for Vera Bradley, has many loyal followers and is an opportunity for us to sell our discontinued merchandise at discounted prices in a brand-right fashion. We attracted more than 65,000 attendees to our 2010 annual outlet sale.

Indirect Sales Consultants

Historically, we worked with independent sales consultants who were not our employees, but most of whom worked exclusively for us. On October 1, 2007, we moved our entire sales force in-house. We believe that having an in-house sales force results in more consistent brand presentation and messaging, enhanced support for our Indirect retailers and a more predictable, scalable and cost-efficient model. As of May 1, 2010, our sales team consisted of 87 in-house, full-time sales consultants. The incentive structure for our sales consultants consists of a combination of fixed pay and sales-based incentives.

In addition to acquiring new and growing existing accounts, our sales consultants serve as a support center for our Indirect retailers by assisting and educating them in areas such as merchandising and visual presentation, marketing of the brand, product selection and inventory management. Our sales consultants also participate in our semi-annual product introduction and education event for our Indirect retailers. Our visual merchandising program provides our sales consultants with a framework to guide our Indirect retailers regarding optimal product placement and display that is intended to reinforce the message that our brand is distinct from those of our competitors.

Our Stores

As of May 1, 2010, we operated 28 full-price stores in 19 states throughout the U.S. We believe there is a significant opportunity to grow our store base as we believe the market in the U.S. can support at least 300 Vera Bradley full-price stores. In fiscal year 2011, we plan to open nine new full-price stores.

Based on the success of our first outlet store opened in fiscal year 2010, the number of attractive outlet centers in the U.S. and the growing popularity of outlet shopping among consumers, we believe the U.S. has capacity to support additional Vera Bradley outlet stores. In fiscal year 2011, we plan to open three new outlet stores. In future years, we will assess the feasibility and attractiveness of designing products and lines exclusively for the outlet channel.

 

49


Table of Contents

Store Location Selection Strategy

Our store location decisions are made case by case, depending on the combined retail strategy we have developed for the particular market. This includes actual and planned penetration in both Indirect and Direct segments, as well as existing e-commerce demand. In addition to store economics, we pay particular attention to the location within the shopping center, the size and shape of the space, and desirable co-tenancies. Along with co-tenants that we believe share our target customer, we seek a balanced mix of moderate and high-end retailers to encourage high levels of traffic. Our target store size is 1,900 square feet, but we are comfortable with spaces as small as 1,000 square feet or, depending on our market strategy and relevant economic factors, spaces as large as 2,800 square feet.

Store Locations

Our full-price stores are located primarily in high-traffic regional malls, lifestyle centers and mixed-use shopping centers across the U.S. The following table shows the number of full-price stores we operated in each state as of May 1, 2010:

 

State

   Total Number of Stores   

State

   Total Number of Stores

Alabama

   1    Michigan    1

California

   4    New Jersey    2

Colorado

   1    New York    1

Florida

   2    Ohio    1

Georgia

   1    Tennessee    1

Hawaii

   1    Texas    3

Illinois

   2    Virginia    1

Indiana

   1    Washington    1

Kansas

   1    Wisconsin    1

Massachusetts

   2      

In addition, as of May 1, 2010, we had one outlet store in Illinois.

Store Operations

The focus of our store operations is providing consumers with a comfortable shopping experience. We strive to make the experience interactive through special store events, such as events showcasing newly launched products or celebrating our namesake’s birthday. Our customer service philosophy emphasizes friendly service, merchandise knowledge and passion for the brand. Consequently, an essential requirement for the success of our stores is our ability to attract, train and retain talented, highly-motivated district managers, store managers and sales associates. Our district and store managers are our primary link to the consumer and we continually invest in their development.

Store Economics

We believe that our innovative retail concept and distinctive retail experience contribute to the success of our stores, most of which generate strong productivity and returns. Our full-price stores average approximately 1,900 square feet per store and we expect to invest approximately $0.3 million per new store, consisting of build-out costs less tenant allowances. New full-price stores generate on average between $0.9 million and $1.1 million in net revenues during the first twelve months and the payback on our investment generally occurs in less than two years. Typically, we have found that, as a new store becomes better integrated into its community and brand awareness grows, the store’s productivity tends to improve as measured by comparable-store sales, but we cannot assure you that full-price stores opened in the future will generate similar net revenues in the first twelve months or pay back our investment in a similar period.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain Model

Our manufacturing and supply chain model is designed to maximize flexibility in order to meet shifting demands in the market. Our model utilizes offshore suppliers and a blend of offshore and domestic manufacturers. We place a strong

 

50


Table of Contents

emphasis on continuous improvement of the model and have employed lean manufacturing concepts. Our broad-based multi-country manufacturing and supply chain model is designed to achieve efficient, timely and accurate order fulfillment while maintaining appropriate levels of inventory.

The majority of our products are cotton-based. Our other products are made from specialty fabrics (including nylon and microfiber) and paper. We source our materials from various suppliers in China and South Korea. Our global supply chain and purchasing teams work together to select suppliers that enable us to optimize the mix of cost, lead time, quality and reliability within our global supply network. All of our suppliers must comply with our quality standards, and we only use a limited number of pre-approved suppliers who have demonstrated a commitment to delivering the highest quality products. We recently opened an office in Dongguan, China, which enables us to increase our control over the manufacturing and supply chain process and monitor compliance with our quality standards.

A significant majority of our finished goods products are manufactured externally overseas. These products are made by a variety of manufacturers located primarily in China. We are not dependent upon any single manufacturer for our products. This overseas production has resulted in substantial cost savings and reduction of capital investment. With the oversight of our office in China and our independent contractors, we believe these financial benefits have been realized without sacrificing the level of quality inherent in our products or service to our customers.

The remainder of our products are manufactured in the U.S. to provide flexibility in our supply chain. This production, almost all of which is internal to Vera Bradley, enables us to manufacture a finished product in as quickly as two weeks. This allows us to rapidly manufacture appropriate quantities of finished product to respond quickly to shifts in marketplace demand and changes in consumer preferences. In fiscal year 2010, approximately 10% of our units were produced in our domestic manufacturing facility.

Distribution Center

In 2007, we consolidated our warehousing and shipping functions into one 200,000 square foot distribution center, located in Roanoke, Indiana. This highly automated, computerized facility allows Vera Bradley employees to receive information directly from the order collection center and quickly identify the products and quantity necessary for a particular order. In addition, we employ a warehouse control system that controls the flow of our products through 5,000 feet of automated conveyer. The facility’s advanced technology enables us to more accurately process and pack orders, as well as track shipments and inventory. We believe that our systems for the processing and shipment of orders from our distribution center have enabled us to improve our overall customer service through enhanced order accuracy and reduced turnaround time.

We strive to maintain the appropriate balance of inventory to enable us to provide a high level of service to our customers, including prompt and accurate delivery of our products. We have an active sales and operations planning process that helps us balance the supply and demand issues that we encounter in our business, optimize our inventory levels and anticipate inventory needs.

Our products are primarily shipped via FedEx and common carriers to our stores, our Indirect retailers and directly to our customers who purchase through our website. We believe we are positioned well to support the order fulfillment requirements of our growing business, including business generated through our website.

Management Information Systems

We believe that high levels of automation and technology are essential to maintain our competitive position. We maintain computer hardware, systems applications and networks to enhance and accelerate the design process, to support the sale and distribution of our products to our customers and to improve the integration and efficiency of our operations. Our management information systems are designed to provide, among other things, comprehensive order processing, production, accounting and management information for the product development, retail, sales, marketing, manufacturing, distribution, finance and human resources functions of our business. We use several specialized systems, including micros Retail, SAP and ILS, for our information technology requirements.

 

51


Table of Contents

Competition

We face strong competition in each of the product lines and markets in which we compete. Our products compete with other branded products within their product categories and with private label products sold by retailers. In our Indirect business, we compete with numerous manufacturers, importers and distributors of handbags, accessories and other products for the limited space available for the display of such products to the consumer. Moreover, the general availability of contract manufacturing allows new entrants access to the markets in which we compete, which may increase the number of competitors and adversely affect our competitive position and our business. In our Direct business, we compete against other gift and specialty retailers, department stores, catalog retailers and Internet businesses that engage in the retail sale of similar products.

In varying degrees, depending on the product category involved, we compete on the basis of design (aesthetic appeal), quality (construction), function, price point, distribution and brand positioning. Some of our competitors have achieved significant recognition for their brand names or have substantially greater financial, distribution, marketing and other resources than we do.

Copyrights and Trademarks

The development of each new pattern includes the design of an overall print, a complementary fabric backing and three sizes of coordinating trim materials. Once developed, we copyright each pattern, including the print, fabric backing and coordinating trim. We currently have in excess of 300 copyrights.

We also own all of the material trademark rights used in connection with the production, marketing and distribution of all of our products, both in the U.S. and in the other countries in which our products are principally sold. Our trademarks include “Vera Bradley.” We aggressively police our trademarks and copyrights and pursue infringers both domestically and internationally. We also pursue counterfeiters domestically and internationally through leads generated internally, as well as through external sources monitoring use in the market. Our trademarks will remain in existence for as long as we continue to use and renew them on their expiration date. We have no material patents.

Employees

As of May 1, 2010, we had 1,059 employees. Of the total, 326 were engaged in retail selling and retail administration positions, 226 were engaged in manufacturing and distribution functions, 22 were engaged in product design and 333 were engaged in corporate support and administrative functions. The remaining employees were engaged in other aspects of our business. None of our employees is represented by a union. We believe that our relations with our employees are good, and we have never encountered a strike or significant work stoppage.

Government Regulation

Many of our imported products are subject to existing or potential duties, tariffs or quotas that may limit the quantity of products that we may import into the U.S. and other countries or impact the cost of such products. To date, we have not been restricted by quotas in the operation of our business, and customs duties have not comprised a material portion of the total cost of a majority of our products. In addition, we are subject to foreign governmental regulation and trade restrictions, including U.S. retaliation against prohibited foreign practices, with respect to our product sourcing and international sales operations.

Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various routine legal proceedings as both plaintiff and defendant incident to the ordinary course of our business. In the ordinary course, we are involved in the policing of our intellectual property rights. As part of our policing program, from time to time we file lawsuits in the U.S. and abroad alleging acts of trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement, trademark dilution and ancillary and pendent state and foreign law claims. These actions often result in seizure of counterfeit merchandise and negotiated settlements with defendants. Defendants sometimes raise as affirmative defenses, or as counterclaims, the invalidity or unenforcability of our proprietary rights. We believe that the outcome of all pending legal proceedings in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

 

52


Table of Contents

Properties

The following table sets forth the location, use and size of our manufacturing, distribution and corporate facilities as of May 1, 2010. The leases on the leased properties expire at various times through 2015, subject to renewal options.

 

Location

  

Primary Use

  

Square Footage

  

Leased /Owned

2208 Production Road, Fort Wayne, Indiana

   Corporate headquarters    27,287    Leased*

11222 Stonebridge Road, Roanoke, Indiana

   Warehouse and distribution    217,320    Owned

5620 Industrial Road, Fort Wayne, Indiana

   Support staff    66,866    Leased

2808 Adams Center Road, Fort Wayne, Indiana

   Sewing and quilting    125,356    Leased

750 5th Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, New York

   Product design and showroom    2,968    Leased

Huaki Plaza, Room 1301 Huaki Building, Shenghe Road, Nancheng District, Dongguan City

   China office    886    Leased

240 Peachtree Street NW, Atlanta, Georgia

   Showroom    5,172    Leased

 

* This property is owned by Milburn, LLC, a leasing company in which Barbara Bradley Baekgaard owns a 50% interest and Patricia R. Miller and P. Michael Miller each own a 25% interest. See “Related Party Transactions.”

As of May 1, 2010, we also leased 29 store locations in the U.S. We consider these properties to be in good condition generally and believe that our facilities are adequate for our operations and provide sufficient capacity to meet our anticipated requirements.

 

53


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth certain information concerning each of our executive officers and directors:

 

Name

   Age   

Position(s)

Michael C. Ray

   49    Chief Executive Officer and Director

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard

   71    Co-Founder, Chief Creative Officer and Director

Patricia R. Miller

   71    Co-Founder, National Spokesperson and Director

Jeffrey A. Blade

   48   

Executive Vice President — Chief Financial and Administrative Officer and Secretary

Kimberly F. Colby

   48    Executive Vice President — Design

C. Roddy Mann

   40    Executive Vice President — Strategy & Business Development

Jill A. Nichols

   49    Executive Vice President — Philanthropy and Community Relations

Matthew C. Wojewuczki

   40    Executive Vice President — Operations

David O. Thompson

   46    Vice President — Direct Sales

P. Michael Miller

   72    Director

Robert J. Hall

   51    Director

John E. Kyees

   63    Director

Michael C. Ray has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 2007 and as a director since June 2010. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Ray served as our Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing. From 1999 to 2004, he served as our National Sales Director. Mr. Ray joined Vera Bradley in 1998 as Director of Finance and served us in that capacity until being promoted to National Sales Director in 1999. He is a board member of the Riley Children’s Foundation in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Mr. Ray has been instrumental in our growth and the development and execution of our long-term strategic plans. He provides our board of directors with an in-depth knowledge of our products, industry, challenges and opportunities, and he communicates management’s perspective on important matters.

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard co-founded Vera Bradley in 1982 and has served as a director since then. From 1982 through June 2010, she also served as Co-President. From the outset, Ms. Bradley Baekgaard has provided leadership and strategic direction in our brand’s development by providing creative vision to areas such as marketing, product design, assortment planning and the design and visual merchandising of our stores. In May 2010, she was appointed Chief Creative Officer. She currently serves as a board member of the Indiana University Cancer Center Development and the Vera Bradley Foundation for Breast Cancer. Ms. Bradley Baekgaard’s most recent personal awards include 2007 Country Living Entrepreneur Award and 2006 Gifts and Decorative Accessories Industry Achievement Award.

As Co-Founder of Vera Bradley, Ms. Bradley Baekgaard serves a key leadership role on our board of directors, and provides the board with a broad array of institutional knowledge and historical perspective as well as an in-depth knowledge of business strategy, branding, product development and store design.

Patricia R. Miller co-founded Vera Bradley in 1982 and has served as a director since then. From 1982 through June 2010, she also served as Co-President. From the outset, Ms. Miller has provided leadership and strategic direction to the business, guiding the development of our operations and supply chain infrastructure and the growth of our employee base. Ms. Miller has also regularly provided a face for Vera Bradley. In June 2010, she was appointed as National Spokesperson for the company where she will continue to promote the brand. Ms. Miller served as the first Secretary of Commerce for the State of Indiana and the Chief Executive Officer of the Indiana Economic Development Corporation from 2005 to 2006. Her most recent personal awards include the Ball State University Indiana Women of Achievement Award for Entrepreneurship in 2006 and the Indiana Historical Society Indiana Living Legend Award in 2008. Ms. Miller serves as a director for the Indiana University Foundation and for the Vera Bradley Foundation for Breast Cancer.

 

54


Table of Contents

As Co-Founder of Vera Bradley, Ms. Miller brings to our board of directors a broad array of institutional knowledge and historical perspective. Ms. Miller also provides insight and perspective on general strategic and business matters, stemming from her executive and finance experience as Secretary of Commerce for the State of Indiana and as Chief Executive Officer of the Indiana Economic Development Corporation.

Jeffrey A. Blade  has served as our Executive Vice President – Chief Financial and Administrative Officer since May 2010 and our Secretary since June 2010. Prior to joining Vera Bradley, from 2009 to January 2010 Mr. Blade served as Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Central Garden and Pet Company, a publicly-traded consumer goods retailer. Mr. Blade previously served in various roles at The Steak ’n Shake company from 2004 to 2008, including Interim President, Executive Vice President – Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Blade was Vice President of Finance for the U.S. operations of Cott Corporation. He served in various financial roles for Kraft Foods Corporation from 1988 to 1999.

Kimberly F. Colby  has served as our Executive Vice President – Design since 2005. From 2003 through 2005, she served as our Vice President of Design. From 1989 to 2003, Ms. Colby served as our Design Director responsible for Marketing and Product Development. Ms. Colby’s professional history includes retail advertising, public relations, direct mail creative direction and management, special event planning and interior design.

C. Roddy Mann  has served as our Executive Vice President – Strategy and Business Development since April 2010 and is responsible for the development of our strategies and new business opportunities in both our Indirect and Direct channels. From 2007 to April 2010, Mr. Mann served as our Vice President – Strategy, Sales and Marketing. From 2006 to 2007, he served as Vice President – Strategic Initiatives. Prior to joining Vera Bradley, Mr. Mann was a Vice President at LakeWest Group, a consulting firm based in Cleveland, Ohio, from 1999 to 2006. In 2006, in a consulting capacity, Mr. Mann assisted us with the development of our Direct retail store strategy and execution plans.

Jill A. Nichols  has served as our Executive Vice President – Philanthropy and Community Relations since April 2010. From 1997 to April 2010, Ms. Nichols served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. From 1992 to 1997, she served as our Director of Operations and, from 1989 to 1992, she served as our Controller and Operations Manager. Prior to joining Vera Bradley, Ms. Nichols held finance positions with the YMCA and Coopers & Lybrand (which later merged with Price Waterhouse to become PricewaterhouseCoopers). She became a Certified Public Accountant in 1986. Ms. Nichols serves as the treasurer and a director of the Vera Bradley Foundation for Breast Cancer.

Matthew C. Wojewuczki  has served as our Executive Vice President – Operations since April 2010. From 2003 to April 2010, Mr. Wojewuczki served as our Vice President – Operations. Prior to joining Vera Bradley, he served as Vice President of Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management of Wabash Alloys, a secondary aluminum producer, from 2000 to 2003. From 1997 to 2000, he served as a principal consultant in the Management Consulting Services Group of PricewaterhouseCoopers. In addition, Mr. Wojewuczki is a Commissioned Officer in the U.S. Air Force Reserves, where he holds the rank of Major.

David O. Thompson  has served as our Vice President – Direct Sales since 2008. Prior to joining Vera Bradley, Mr. Thompson was a Senior Consultant, Manager and Vice President at LakeWest Group from 1998 to 2008. Prior to working at LakeWest Group, he served in various retail positions at OfficeMax, based in Cleveland, Ohio, and Bradlees, based in Braintree, Massachusetts. With over 20 years of experience in the retail industry, Mr. Thompson has expertise in retail operations, web operations, business process improvement and information technology in traditional retail, catalog and e-commerce channels.

P. Michael Miller  has served as a director since 1990. From 1990 through June 2010, he also served as our Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Miller is a senior partner in the law firm of Hunt Suedhoff Kalamaros LLP. He has been a partner with the firm since 1997. Mr. Miller also serves as a director of the Vera Bradley Foundation for Breast Cancer.

Mr. Miller has been involved with Vera Bradley since its inception and brings to our board of directors a broad array of institutional knowledge and historical perspective. Mr. Miller also provides insight and guidance on legal and business matters, stemming from his experience as a practicing attorney.

 

55


Table of Contents

Robert J. Hall  has served as a director since 2007. Mr. Hall currently is the principal of Andesite Holdings, a private investment firm which he founded in 2007. Prior to founding Andesite Holdings, Mr. Hall served as an Executive Director for UBS Financial Services from 2000 to 2005. From 1995 to 2000, he served as a Senior Vice President for Paine Webber in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Mr. Hall serves as a director of Thomas Raymond & Co., a manufacturer of men’s handcrafted footwear, New World Stoneworks LLC, a retailer of stone products, and KodaBow Inc., a manufacturer and retailer of sporting goods. Mr. Hall also serves as the Chairman of the Board of the Mid-Atlantic region of Teach for America.

Mr. Hall provides our board of directors with insight and perspective on general strategic and financial matters, stemming from his extensive experience in investment banking, investment management, financial planning and private placements.

John E. Kyees  has served as a director since April 2010. Mr. Kyees served as the Chief Investor Relations Officer of Urban Outfitters, Inc. from 2009 to 2010 and served that company as Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to 2009. Mr. Kyees formerly held the position of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer for bebe stores, Inc., a retail chain headquartered in San Francisco, California, from 2002 to 2003. Prior to joining bebe, Mr. Kyees served as Chief Financial Officer for Skinmarket, a startup teenage cosmetic retailer, from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Kyees was also Chief Financial Officer for HC Holdings from 1997 to 2000. HC Holdings filed a bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in 2000. From May 1997 to December 1997, he was Chief Financial Officer for Ashley Stewart and from 1984 to 1997 Mr. Kyees was Chief Financial Officer for Express, which was a division of The Limited Brands, Inc. Mr. Kyees is currently a director and member of the audit committee of Casual Male Retail Group, Inc., a publicly-traded specialty retailer of men’s clothing.

Mr. Kyees brings to our board of directors over 40 years of experience in the consumer products retail and manufacturing industries. He has over 30 years of experience as a chief financial officer and nine years serving in that role for a public company. Institutional Investor magazine selected Mr. Kyees as a top specialty retail chief financial officer on five separate occasions, evidencing his strong skills in corporate finance, strategic and accounting matters.

Board of Directors and Board Committees

We believe that our board of directors as a whole should encompass a range of talent, skill, diversity, and expertise enabling it to provide sound guidance with respect to our operations and interests. In addition to considering a candidate’s background and accomplishments, candidates are reviewed in the context of the current composition of our board of directors and the evolving needs of our businesses. Our board of directors identifies candidates for election to the board and reviews their skills, characteristics and experience.

Our board of directors seeks directors with strong reputations and experience in areas relevant to the strategy and operations of our businesses, particularly industries and growth segments that we serve. We believe each of our current directors has operating experience that meets this objective. We believe that our board collectively has experience in core management skills, such as strategic and financial planning, public company financial reporting, corporate governance, risk management and leadership development.

Our board of directors also believes that each of our current directors has other key attributes that are important to an effective board: integrity and demonstrated high ethical standards; sound judgment; analytical skills; the ability to engage management and each other in a constructive and collaborative fashion; diversity of origin, background, experience and thought; and the commitment to devote significant time and energy to service on our board.

Our board of directors currently consists of Barbara Bradley Baekgaard, Robert J. Hall, John E. Kyees, Patricia R. Miller, P. Michael Miller and Michael C. Ray. Our board has determined that Barbara Bradley Baekgaard, Patricia R. Miller, P. Michael Miller, Robert J. Hall and Michael C. Ray are not independent under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” for a description of such relationships. Our board has also affirmatively determined that John E. Kyees does satisfy the independence requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market standards for service on our board and each of its committees.

Although The Nasdaq Stock Market standards require that a majority of our directors be independent, under special phase-in rules applicable to initial public offerings we have twelve months from the date of listing to comply with this

 

56


Table of Contents

requirement. We plan to achieve compliance with this requirement by adding independent directors to our board of directors before the expiration of the phase-in period.

Prior to the effectiveness of our registration statement, our board of directors will establish an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee.

Although The Nasdaq Stock Market standards require that all members of our board committees be independent, under special phase-in rules applicable to initial public offerings we have twelve months from the date of listing to comply with this requirement. We believe that the composition of our board committees will meet the criteria for independence under the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market before the expiration of the phase-in period. Additionally, we believe that the functioning of these committees will comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market and SEC rules and regulations.

Audit Committee.  The audit committee will review and recommend to the board of directors internal accounting and financial controls and accounting principles and auditing practices to be employed in the preparation and review of our financial statements. In addition, the audit committee will have the authority to engage public accountants to audit our annual financial statements and determine the scope of the audit to be undertaken by such accountants. Our board of directors has indicated its intention to appoint John E. Kyees as a member of the audit committee. As determined by our board, John E. Kyees is an audit committee financial expert under SEC rules implementing the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Compensation Committee.  The compensation committee will review and recommend to our Chief Executive Officer and the board of directors policies, practices and procedures relating to the compensation of managerial employees and the establishment and administration of certain employee benefit plans for managerial employees. The compensation committee will have the authority to administer our 2010 Plan and advise and consult with our officers regarding managerial personnel policies.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  The nominating and corporate governance committee will assist the board of directors with its responsibilities regarding the identification of individuals qualified to become directors, the selection of the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders and the selection of director candidates to fill any vacancies on the board of directors.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our compensation committee serves, or has at any time served, as an officer or employee of us or any of our subsidiaries. None of our executive officers has served as a member of the compensation committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as a member of our compensation committee.

Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation will provide for indemnification, to the fullest extent permitted by the IBCL, of our directors and officers against liability and reasonable expenses that may be incurred by them in connection with proceedings to which the directors or officers are made a party by reason of their relationship to the company. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws will also provide for indemnification of our directors and officers where they have acted in good faith, which means that in the case of official action, they reasonably believed the conduct was in our best interests and in all other cases, the action taken was not against our best interests, and in the case of criminal proceedings, they had reasonable cause to believe the action was lawful or there was no reasonable cause to believe the action was unlawful. Prior to the completion of this offering, we intend to obtain insurance that insures our directors and officers against specified losses.

In addition, prior to the completion of this offering, we intend to enter into separate indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. We believe that these provisions and agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and executive officers. These indemnification agreements may require us to indemnify our directors and executive officers for related expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement that were actually and reasonably incurred or suffered by a director or executive officer in an action or proceeding arising out of his or her service as one of our directors or executive officers.

 

57


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This is a presentation of the material elements of compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers identified in the “Summary Compensation Table” (collectively, our named executive officers) who served in those positions during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010. To assist in understanding our named executive officer compensation program, we have included a discussion of our compensation policies and decisions for periods before and after fiscal year 2010 where relevant.

Our compensation program is designed to provide some common standards throughout the company. Therefore, much of what is disclosed below applies to executives in general and is not limited to our named executive officers.

Overview

Our board of directors has overall responsibility for the compensation program for our named executive officers. Following the offering, a compensation committee of our board of directors will have overall responsibility for the compensation program for our named executive officers. Members of the compensation committee will be appointed by the board of directors.

Our executive compensation program is designed to encourage our named executive officers to focus on building shareholder value, maximizing growth and profitability, as well as continuing to maintain our unique culture and building our strong brand. We strive to provide our named executive officers with a compensation package that is competitive within our industry.

Our objective is to provide a competitive total rewards compensation package to attract and retain key personnel and drive effective results. Our executive compensation program provides for the following main elements:

 

  ¡  

base salaries, which are designed to allow us to attract and retain qualified candidates in a highly competitive market;

 

  ¡  

annual incentive compensation, which provides additional cash compensation and is designed to support our pay-for-performance philosophy, and, beginning during fiscal year 2011, equity-based compensation; and

 

  ¡  

a comprehensive benefits package that is available to all of our employees.

A detailed description of these components is provided below.

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Base Salary.  We utilize base salary as the primary means of providing compensation for performing the essential elements of an executive’s job. We believe our base salaries are set at levels that allow us to attract and retain executives in competitive markets.

Annual Incentive Compensation.  Our annual incentive compensation, in the form of an annual cash bonus, is intended to compensate our named executive officers for meeting our corporate objectives and, for some of our named executive officers, individual performance objectives, and to incentivize our named executive officers to meet these objectives. These objectives may be both financial and non-financial and may be based on company or individual performance. The board of directors typically sets a target level where the full 100% bonus can be earned and then also sets a slightly lower target where a partial bonus can be earned if the objective is almost achieved, as well as a higher target where a larger-than-100% bonus can be earned for exceeding the 100% bonus target.

 

58


Table of Contents

Long-Term Incentive Compensation.  Beginning in fiscal year 2011, we intend to add long-term equity awards to our executive compensation program in order to compete for executive talent and align the interests of our named executive officers with those of the company’s owners. We anticipate that long-term incentive compensation will be an integral part of our compensation program going forward.

Benefits.  Our benefits, such as our basic health benefits, 401(k) plan, life insurance, paid time off, matching charitable gifts program, tuition reimbursement and discounts on certain company products, are intended to provide a stable array of support to our employees and their families throughout various stages of their careers, and these core benefits are provided to all employees. The 401(k) plan allows participants to defer amounts of their annual compensation before taxes, up to the cap set by the Internal Revenue Code, which was $16,500 per person for calendar year 2009. Employees’ elective deferrals are immediately vested and nonforfeitable upon contribution to the 401(k) plan. We currently provide matching contributions equal to 50% of an employee’s individual contribution, up to a maximum of 10% of the participant’s annual salary and subject to certain other limits.

Determining the Amount of Each Element of Compensation

Overview.  The amount of each element of our compensation program is determined by our board of directors on an annual basis taking into consideration our results of operations, long and short-term goals, individual goals, the competitive market for our named executive officers and general economic factors. In fiscal year 2010 and in prior years, our approach has been to provide executives with a base salary and an annual bonus opportunity that were generally competitive with the level of those elements paid for comparable positions at comparable companies.

In fiscal year 2010, our board of directors engaged a compensation consultant, Towers Watson (formerly known as Towers Perrin, prior to its merger with Watson Wyatt), to provide data and recommendations regarding our compensation program in order to remain competitive with compensation programs at other companies with which we may compete for talent. Their final report and recommendations were presented in fiscal year 2011.

Once the level of compensation is set for the year, the board of directors may revisit its decisions if there are material developments during the year, such as promotions, that may warrant a change in compensation. After the year is over, the board of directors reviews the performance of the named executive officers to determine the achievement of annual incentive compensation targets and to assess the overall functioning of our compensation plans against our goals.

Base Pay.  Our board of directors reviews our named executive officers’ base salaries on an annual basis taking into consideration the factors described above as well as changes in position or responsibilities. In the event of material changes in position, responsibilities or other factors, the board of directors may consider changes in base pay during the year. The level of base pay for each named executive officer in fiscal year 2010 and prior years was not determined through formal benchmarking, but rather through an annual assessment of the individual factors described in “— Overview” above. Most of our named executive officers received a 3.5% increase in base salary during fiscal year 2010. This increase represented, and was set based on, the company-wide average merit increase for all employees during fiscal year 2010. Additional increases were made to reflect promotions and any other significant performance during fiscal year 2009.

In fiscal year 2010, our board of directors engaged Towers Watson to review our current levels of base salary as compared to the market. Base salary data was gathered from Watson Wyatt’s Top Management Database, which was adjusted to the company’s revenue size. We did not select a specific peer group nor did we review data from specific companies (nor were we aware of the identities of the specific component companies included in the database), but rather we used market pay data for the non-durable goods manufacturer segment within the Watson Wyatt database. The base salary data that was gathered was effective as of April 1, 2010. We consider a range of +/- 15% around the market median (50th percentile) to be competitive but still capable of recognizing differences among executives. Our objective is generally to be within the competitive range of the market median, on average, for base salaries of our executive officers, including our named executive officers.

As a result of our consultant’s review, the board of directors decided to adjust Mr. Ray’s base salary (which, for fiscal year 2010, was 25% below the 50th percentile) for fiscal year 2011 so that his base salary was at the 50th percentile of

 

59


Table of Contents

chief executive officers of the surveyed companies. Mr. Traylor also received a fiscal year 2011 base salary increase due to his performance in fiscal year 2010. In addition, Ms. Colby received a fiscal year 2011 base salary increase due to the company’s performance in fiscal year 2010.

The following table shows base salary rate increases for each of our named executive officers since fiscal year 2009.

 

Name and Principal Position

   Fiscal Year
2009 Base
Salary Rate(1)
   Fiscal Year
2010 Base
Salary Rate(2)
   Fiscal Year
2010
Percentage
Increase
    Fiscal Year
2011 Base
Salary Rate(3)
   Fiscal Year
2011
Percentage
Increase
 

Michael C. Ray

Chief Executive Officer

   $ 400,010    $ 413,998    3.5   $ 550,004    32.9

David R. Traylor

Vice President — Finance(4)

     240,006      255,450    6.4     267,280    4.6

Jill A. Nichols

Executive Vice President — Philanthropy and Community Relations(5)

     350,012      362,258    3.5     362,258    n/a   

Kimberly F. Colby

Executive Vice President — Design

     350,012      362,258    3.5     379,002    4.6

Patricia R. Miller

Co-Founder and National Spokesperson(6)

     450,008      465,764    3.5     465,764    n/a   

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard

Co-Founder and Chief Creative Officer(7)

     450,008      465,764    3.5     465,764    n/a   

 

(1) Effective for Mr. Ray, Ms. Nichols, Ms. Colby, Ms. Miller and Ms. Bradley Baekgaard in November 2007, and for Mr. Traylor in November 2008.

 

(2) Effective April 26, 2009.

 

(3) Effective March 28, 2010.

 

(4) Prior to April 29, 2010, Mr. Traylor was our Chief Financial Officer, a position to which he was appointed in fiscal year 2009.

 

(5) Prior to April 29, 2010, Ms. Nichols’ position was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.

 

(6) Prior to June 29, 2010, Ms. Miller’s position was Co-President.

 

(7) Prior to June 29, 2010, Ms. Bradley Baekgaard’s position was Co-President and Chief Creative Officer.

Annual Incentive Compensation.  Our board of directors establishes the goals for our Annual Incentive Bonus Program on an annual basis and distributions are typically made after the end of each fiscal year after the board of directors has determined if the goals have been achieved. However, the board of directors has the authority to modify a bonus structure during the year if they deem appropriate.

Ms. Miller and Ms. Bradley Baekgaard have not participated in our Annual Incentive Bonus Program. For our other named executive officers, our Annual Incentive Bonus Program provided a potential bonus for fiscal year 2010 based on annual goals. For Mr. Ray, Ms. Nichols and Ms. Colby, the potential bonus was based 100% on company-wide net income goals, and for Mr. Traylor, was based 50% on company-wide net income goals and 50% on qualitative individual performance goals.

Our board of directors established net income goals for fiscal year 2010 for purposes of developing the Annual Incentive Bonus Program. Actual net income for fiscal year 2010 was $43.2 million, which resulted in the payment of annual incentive awards at their maximum level. In addition, based on the board’s and Mr. Ray’s overall evaluation of Mr. Traylor’s individual performance, Mr. Traylor earned the maximum of the 50% portion of the annual bonus opportunity that was based on individual performance goals for fiscal year 2010.

 

60


Table of Contents

For each of our named executive officers, the board of directors set a target bonus at a certain percentage of the particular executive’s base salary for fiscal year 2010. As with base salaries for fiscal year 2010, the target bonus percentage for each executive was intended to be competitive with the target bonus levels for comparable positions at comparable companies.

Our board of directors set each executive’s fiscal year 2010 threshold, target and maximum bonus as a percentage of his fiscal year 2010 annualized base salary as set forth in the table below.

 

Name(1)

   2009
Calendar Year
Base Salary
Earned(2)
   Fiscal Year
2010 Threshold
Bonus
Opportunity
   Fiscal Year
2010 Target
Bonus
Opportunity
   Fiscal Year
2010 Maximum
Bonus
Opportunity
   Fiscal Year 2010
Threshold/Target/Maximum
Bonus as a Percentage of
Base Salary
   Fiscal Year
2010 Bonus
Earned

Michael C. Ray

   $ 409,156    $ 153,434    $ 255,723    $ 306,867    37.5% / 62.5% / 75.0%    $ 306,867

David R. Traylor

     250,121      31,265      93,795      122,716    12.5% / 37.5% / 49.1%      122,716

Jill A. Nichols

     358,019      134,257      223,762      268,514    37.5% / 62.5% / 75.0%      268,514

Kimberly F. Colby

     358,019      134,257      223,762      268,514    37.5% / 62.5% / 75.0%      268,514

 

(1) Neither Ms. Miller nor Ms. Bradley Baekgaard participated in our Annual Incentive Bonus Program.

 

(2) Our Annual Incentive Bonus Program payouts for fiscal year 2010 were determined based on salary earned during the 2009 calendar year.

In fiscal year 2010, our board of directors engaged Towers Watson to review our current levels of bonus compensation. Target bonus values were gathered from Towers Perrin’s Executive Compensation Database, which was adjusted to the company’s revenue size. We did not select a specific peer group nor did we review data from specific companies (nor were we aware of the identities of the specific component companies included in the database), but rather we used market pay data for the general industries segment within the Towers Perrin database. The bonus information that was gathered was effective as of April 1, 2010. Consistent with our company-wide approach of targeting annual incentive opportunities near the market 60th percentile for all employees, the board of directors decided to adjust the annual target bonus opportunity in fiscal year 2011 for our named executive officers to approach more closely the 60th percentile of comparable positions at comparable companies within the database. Ms. Nichols and Ms. Colby’s fiscal year 2011 target bonus opportunities were reduced to 50% of their fiscal year 2011 base salaries (from a previous bonus opportunity of 62.5% of their fiscal year 2010 base salaries), with their maximum opportunities unchanged at 75% of base salary.

Mr. Ray’s fiscal year 2010 target bonus opportunity was significantly below the 60th percentile for chief executive officers in the survey data. Mr. Ray’s target bonus opportunity for fiscal year 2011 was set at 60% of his fiscal year 2011 base salary (compared to a previous opportunity of 62.5% of his fiscal year 2010 base salary). The board of directors decided not to increase Mr. Ray’s annual target bonus opportunity to the 60th percentile (which would have resulted in a target bonus opportunity of 90% of his fiscal year 2011 base salary) because his recently-increased base salary had already resulted in a dramatic increase in Mr. Ray’s fiscal year 2011 annual target bonus opportunity from his fiscal year 2010 annual target bonus opportunity.

Mr. Traylor’s fiscal year 2011 target bonus opportunity was increased to 50% of his fiscal year 2011 base salary (from a previous bonus opportunity of 37.5% of his fiscal year 2010 base salary), which is above the 60th percentile for his position. However, the board of directors determined this increase was appropriate based on the experience Mr. Traylor brings to the company as a result of having formerly served as the company’s chief financial officer.

Bonus payouts for fiscal year 2011 will be determined as follows: for the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, based 100% on a combination of company-wide net revenues and operating income performance; and for the position of Vice President, based 75% on a combination of company-wide net revenues and operating income performance and 25% on individual performance.

 

61


Table of Contents

The table below sets forth each named executive officer’s threshold, target and maximum annual bonus opportunity for fiscal year 2011, as well as the bonus levels as a percentage of each officer’s fiscal year 2011 annualized base salary.

 

Name(1)

   Fiscal Year
2011
Annualized
Base Salary
Rate
   Fiscal Year
2011
Threshold
Bonus
Opportunity
   Fiscal Year
2011

Target
Bonus
Opportunity
   Fiscal Year
2011
Maximum
Bonus
Opportunity
   Fiscal Year 2011
Threshold/Target/Maximum
Bonus as a Percentage of
Base Salary

Michael C. Ray

   $ 550,004    $ 165,000    $ 330,000    $ 495,000    30% / 60% / 90%

David R. Traylor

     267,280      66,820      133,640      200,460    25% / 50% / 75%

Jill A. Nichols

     362,258      90,565      181,129      271,694    25% / 50% / 75%

Kimberly F. Colby

     379,002      94,751      189,501      284,252    25% / 50% / 75%

 

(1) Neither Ms. Miller nor Ms. Bradley Baekgaard participated in our Annual Incentive Bonus Program.

Equity Compensation Awards

In fiscal year 2010 and prior years, we did not have a plan or arrangement under which our named executive officers were granted options or other equity awards.

Pre-IPO Equity Grants.  In order to retain key executives and provide a vehicle for executive equity ownership, our board of directors intends to grant to our named executive officers and certain of our executive officers and non-employee directors a one-time grant of restricted shares of our common stock prior to the completion of this offering. The total number of shares granted will not exceed 31,400 shares.

The size of each individual restricted share grant will be based primarily on a combination of internal pay equity considerations, overall dilution of current ownership and our lack of any equity incentive compensation to date. We will also review, solely as a reference point and not for benchmarking purposes, market data on long-term incentive opportunities within the general industries segment of the Towers Perrin Executive Compensation Database.

Post-IPO Equity and Incentive Grants.  Our board of directors intends to implement an equity and cash incentive plan that will allow us to provide a variety of different types of incentive awards to our executives and other employees following the completion of this offering. The 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) will permit us to issue stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance units, performance shares and cash incentive awards to eligible employees, including our named executive officers, as determined by the compensation committee. The board of directors has not yet determined which of these vehicles will be used going forward. For more details regarding the 2010 Plan, see “— 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan” below.

As of the date of this prospectus, there have not been any awards of restricted shares granted to executive officers or non-employee directors, or any stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance units or performance shares granted under the 2010 Plan or any other plan in accordance with GAAP. As such, there is no fair value of stock-based compensation to measure.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

We do not have any formal severance, change in control or employment agreements or arrangements with our named executive officers. Severance arrangements with executives have traditionally been determined on a case-by-case basis. We have a general severance policy for employees that provides for one week of pay for each year of service with us, with a minimum total payment of 2 weeks of pay, in the event of an involuntary termination of the employee by us. The board of directors is considering adopting a more formal severance plan for executives going forward. For a description of the severance agreement with our new Executive Vice President — Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, see “— Hiring of New Chief Financial and Administrative Officer” below.

 

62


Table of Contents

The 2010 Plan may provide for a potential acceleration of outstanding awards in the event of an involuntary termination of employment for an executive in connection with a change in control, as defined in the 2010 Plan. See “— 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan” below for a description of the change in control provisions contained in the 2010 Plan.

Effect of Accounting and Tax Treatment on Compensation Decisions

In the review and establishment of our compensation programs, we consider, among other factors, the anticipated accounting and tax implications to us and our executives. After the completion of this offering, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code may impose a limit on the amount of compensation that we may deduct in any one year with respect to our chief executive officer and each of our next three most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief financial officer, unless specific and detailed criteria are satisfied. Performance-based compensation, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, is fully deductible if the programs are approved by shareholders and meet other requirements. We will seek to maintain flexibility in compensating our executives in a manner designed to promote our corporate goals and therefore we have not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible. Our compensation committee will assess the impact of Section 162(m) on our compensation practices and determine what further action, if any, is appropriate. The 2010 Plan will allow us to provide compensation that meets the deductibility requirements of Section 162(m).

Role of Executives in Executive Compensation Decisions

Our board of directors, which includes Ms. Miller and Ms. Bradley Baekgaard, generally seeks input from Mr. Ray when discussing the performance of and compensation levels for the other named executive officers. The board of directors also works with Messrs. Ray and Traylor and the head of our human resources department in evaluating the financial, accounting, tax and retention implications of our various compensation programs. Neither Mr. Ray, Mr. Traylor nor any of our other executives participates in deliberations relating to his or her own compensation, other than Ms. Miller and Ms. Bradley Baekgaard, each of whom participated in the setting of their own base salary levels and, in their roles as directors of the company, in the setting of compensation of our other named executive officers.

Hiring of New Chief Financial and Administrative Officer

On May 2, 2010, we hired Jeffrey A. Blade to serve as our Executive Vice President — Chief Financial and Administrative Officer. Mr. Blade’s responsibilities are to oversee our finances, human resources, information technology, legal matters and investor relations. Mr. Blade’s base salary for fiscal year 2011 is $315,016, and his target bonus opportunity for fiscal year 2011 is 50% of his fiscal year 2011 base salary. Mr. Blade’s fiscal year 2011 base salary is within the competitive range of the targeted market 50th percentile, and his fiscal year 2011 target bonus opportunity corresponds with our company-wide approach of aligning target bonuses with the market 60th percentile. Mr. Blade will also receive relocation benefits in fiscal year 2011 as part of his hiring. In addition, if his employment is terminated by us without just cause (as defined in his offer letter), he will be entitled to a severance payment equal to one year’s base salary and a pro-rata bonus for the portion of the year prior to his termination, to the extent that a bonus would be payable for the year based on company performance.

 

63


Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows information concerning the annual compensation for services to the company in all capacities of the company’s named executive officers during the last completed fiscal year.

 

Name and Principal Position

  Fiscal
Year
  Salary(1)   Bonus   Stock
Awards
  Option
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
  Change in
Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compen-

sation(3)
  Total
Compen-
sation

Michael C. Ray

Chief Executive Officer

  2010   $ 410,232   n/a   n/a   n/a   $ 306,867   n/a   $ 11,800   $ 728,899

David R. Traylor

Vice President — Finance(4)

  2010     251,311   n/a   n/a   n/a     122,716   n/a     11,000     385,027

Jill A. Nichols

Executive Vice President — Philanthropy and Community Relations(5)

  2010     359,011   n/a   n/a   n/a     268,514   n/a     11,800     639,275

Kimberly F. Colby

Executive Vice President — Design

  2010     358,961   n/a   n/a   n/a     268,514   n/a     10,300     637,775

Patricia R. Miller

Co-Founder and National Spokesperson(6)

  2010     461,522   n/a   n/a   n/a     n/a   n/a     21,880     483,402

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard

Co-Founder and Chief Creative Officer(7)

  2010     461,522   n/a   n/a   n/a     n/a   n/a     18,955     480,477

 

(1) Reflects a blend of the base salary rates of our named executive officers that went into effect on April 26, 2009 and the base salary rates prior to April 26, 2009.

 

(2) Includes annual incentive compensation paid under the company’s Annual Incentive Bonus Program.

 

(3) Includes 401(k) matching contributions made by the company of $8,250 for each of Mr. Ray, Ms. Nichols and Ms. Colby, and $11,000 for each of Mr. Traylor, Ms. Miller and Ms. Bradley Baekgaard; automobile allowances of $4,405 and $7,330 for Ms. Miller and Ms. Bradley Baekgaard, respectively; and reimbursement for tax planning services of $3,550 for each of Mr. Ray, Ms. Nichols, Ms. Miller and Ms. Bradley Baekgaard, and $2,050 for Ms. Colby.

 

(4) Prior to April 29, 2010, Mr. Traylor’s position was Chief Financial Officer.

 

(5) Prior to April 29, 2010, Ms. Nichols’ position was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.

 

(6) Prior to June 29, 2010, Ms. Miller’s position was Co-President.

 

(7) Prior to June 29, 2010, Ms. Bradley Baekgaard’s position was Co-President and Chief Creative Officer.

Fiscal Year 2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards in fiscal year 2010.

 

     Estimated Potential Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan  Awards(1)
     Threshold    Target    Maximum

Michael C. Ray

   $ 153,434    $ 255,723    $ 306,867

David R. Traylor

     31,265      93,795      122,716

Jill A. Nichols

     134,257      223,762      268,514

Kimberly F. Colby

     134,257      223,762      268,514

Patricia R. Miller(2)

     n/a      n/a      n/a

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard(2)

     n/a      n/a      n/a

 

(1) Awards made under the company’s Annual Incentive Bonus Program. Actual amounts earned under the program are disclosed in the “non-equity incentive plan compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2) Neither Ms. Miller nor Ms. Bradley Baekgaard received any grants of plan-based awards in fiscal year 2010 because they do not participate in the Annual Incentive Bonus Program.

 

64


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2010 Fiscal Year-End

There were no outstanding equity awards as of January 31, 2010.

In 1998, Ms. Nichols purchased 50,005 shares of the company’s common stock at fair market value, which are not subject to any vesting schedule and which are still owned by Ms. Nichols. In 2003, each of Mr. Ray, Ms. Nichols and Ms. Colby purchased 50,005 shares of the company’s common stock at fair market value, which are not subject to any vesting period and which are still owned by Mr. Ray, Ms. Nichols and Ms. Colby.

Fiscal Year 2010 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

None of our named executive officers exercised options or had stock awards that vested during fiscal year 2010.

Fiscal Year 2010 Pension Benefits

Aside from our 401(k) plan, we do not maintain any pension plan or arrangement under which our named executive officers are entitled to participate or receive post-retirement benefits.

Fiscal Year 2010 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not maintain any nonqualified deferred compensation plan or arrangements under which our named executive officers are entitled to participate.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Our named executive officers are not specifically entitled to any payments upon termination of employment or upon a change in control. Severance arrangements with executives have typically been determined on a case-by-case basis in the past. However, we maintain an informal general severance policy that provides all employees, including our named executive officers, with one week of pay for each year of service with the company, with a minimum total payment of 2 weeks pay, in the event of an involuntary termination of the employee by the company. The following table shows the value of severance benefits that would be payable in a lump sum to each of our named executive officers under this formula, assuming an involuntary termination of employment, other than for good cause, as of January 31, 2010.

 

Name(1)

   Severance

Michael C. Ray

   $ 95,538

David R. Traylor

     24,565

Jill A. Nichols

     146,297

Kimberly F. Colby

     146,297

Patricia R. Miller

     n/a

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard

     n/a

 

(1) Neither Ms. Miller nor Ms. Bradley Baekgaard participates in our severance program.

Compensation and Risk

We have, with the assistance of our board’s compensation consultant, evaluated the risk profile of our compensation policies and practices, and concluded that they do not motivate imprudent risk taking. In our evaluation, we reviewed our employee compensation structures, and noted numerous factors and design elements that manage and mitigate risk without diminishing the incentive nature of the compensation, including:

 

  ¡  

a unique and strong company culture that attracts passionate and motivated employees who are excited about our products and our brand (as opposed to being motivated by purely financial considerations);

 

65


Table of Contents
  ¡  

as proposed for fiscal year 2011, a balanced mix between cash and equity, and annual and longer-term incentives under our executive compensation program;

 

  ¡  

the large percentage ownership of our shares by senior management, which ensures that their interests are aligned with the long-term interests of the company and our shareholders;

 

  ¡  

reasonable limits on annual incentive awards (as determined by a review of our current business plan);

 

  ¡  

with respect to annual incentive awards, a balanced mix of performance measures and linear payouts between target levels; and

 

  ¡  

subjective considerations (including a review of individual performance) and discretion in compensation decisions, which limit the influence of formulae or objective factors on excessive risk taking.

We also reviewed our compensation programs for certain design features that may have the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking, including: over-weighting towards annual incentives, highly leveraged payout curves, unreasonable thresholds, and steep payout cliffs at certain performance levels that may encourage short-term business decisions to meet payout thresholds. We concluded that our compensation programs do not include such elements. In addition, we analyzed our overall enterprise risks and how compensation programs may impact individual behavior in a manner that could exacerbate these enterprise risks. In light of these analyses, we concluded that we have a balanced pay and performance program that does not encourage excessive risk-taking that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.

2010 Equity and Incentive Plan

We intend to adopt the Vera Bradley, Inc. 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (referred to below as the 2010 Plan) in connection with this offering. The principal purposes of the 2010 Plan are to optimize the profitability and growth of the company through short-term and long-term incentives that are consistent with the company’s objectives and that link participants’ interests to those of the company’s shareholders; to give participants an incentive for excellence in individual performance; to promote teamwork among participants; and to give the company a significant advantage in attracting and retaining key employees, directors, and consultants. Our 2010 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance based awards (including performance shares, performance units, performance bonus awards), and other stock or cash-based awards.

Administration.  The 2010 Plan will be administered by our board of directors or by a committee that the board designates for this purpose (referred to below as the Plan Administrator). The Plan Administrator has the power to determine the terms of the awards granted under our 2010 Plan, including the exercise price, the number of shares subject to each award, and the exercisability of the awards. The Plan Administrator also has full power to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which awards will be made and to make all other determinations and take all other actions advisable for the administration of the 2010 Plan.

Grant of Awards; Shares Available for Awards.  Certain employees, advisors, and directors are eligible to be granted awards under the 2010 Plan, other than incentive stock options, which may be granted only to employees. We have reserved             shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2010 Plan. The number of shares issued or reserved pursuant to the 2010 Plan will be adjusted by the Plan Administrator, as they deem appropriate and equitable, as a result of stock splits, stock dividends, and similar changes in our common stock.

Stock Options.  Under the 2010 Plan, the Plan Administrator may grant participants incentive stock options, which qualify for special tax treatment in the United States, as well as non-qualified stock options. The Plan Administrator will establish the duration of each option at the time it is granted, with a maximum duration of ten years from the effective date of the 2010 Plan, and may also establish vesting performance requirements that must be met prior to the exercise of options. Stock option grants must have an exercise price that is equal to or greater than the fair market value of our common stock on

 

66


Table of Contents

the date of grant. Stock option grants may include provisions that permit the option holder to exercise all or part of the holder’s vested options, or to satisfy withholding tax liabilities, by tendering shares of our common stock already owned by the option holder for at least six months (or another period consistent with the applicable accounting rules) with a fair market value equal to the exercise price.

Stock Appreciation Rights.  The Plan Administrator may also grant stock appreciation rights, which will be exercisable upon the occurrence of certain contingent events. Stock appreciation rights entitle the holder upon exercise to receive an amount in any combination of cash and shares of our common stock (as determined by the Plan Administrator) equal in value to the excess of the fair market value of the shares covered by the stock appreciation rights over the exercise price of the right.

Restricted Stock.  The Plan Administrator may also grant restricted stock, which are awards of our shares of common stock that vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Plan Administrator. The Plan Administrator will determine in the award agreement whether the participant will be entitled to vote the shares of restricted stock and/or receive dividends on such shares.

Restricted Stock Units.  Restricted Stock Units represent the right to receive shares of our common stock at a specified date in the future, subject to forfeiture of such right. If the restricted stock unit has not been forfeited, then on the date specified in the restricted stock unit grant, the company must deliver to the holder of the restricted stock unit, unrestricted shares of our common stock, which will be freely transferable.

Performance Based Awards.  Performance based awards are denominated in shares of our common stock, stock units, or cash, and are linked to the satisfaction of performance criteria established by the Plan Administrator. If the Plan Administrator determines that the performance based award to an employee is intended to meet the requirements of “qualified performance based compensation” and therefore is deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, then the performance based criteria upon which the awards will be based shall be with reference to any one or more of the following: earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; net operating profit after tax; cash flow; revenue; net revenues; sales; same store sales; income; net income; operating income; net operating income, operating margin; earnings; earnings per share; return on equity; return on investment; return on capital; return on assets; return on net assets; total shareholder return; economic profit; market share; appreciation in the fair market value, book value or other measure of value of the company’s common stock; expense/cost control; working capital; volume/production; new products; customer satisfaction; brand development; employee retention or employee turnover; employee satisfaction or engagement; environmental, health, or other safety goals; individual performance; or strategic objectives milestones.

Change in Control Provisions.  In connection with the grant of an award, the Plan Administrator may provide that, in the event of an involuntary termination of an executive’s employment by the company in connection with a change in control, any outstanding awards that are unexercisable or otherwise unvested will become fully vested and/or immediately exercisable.

Amendment and Termination.  Our board of directors may alter, amend, modify, or terminate the 2010 Plan at any time. However, no modification of an award will, without the prior written consent of the participant, materially impair any rights or obligations under any award already granted under the 2010 Plan unless the board expressly reserved the right to do so at the time of the award.

Compliance with Applicable Laws.  We have attempted to structure the 2010 Plan so that remuneration attributable to stock options and other awards will not subject to a deduction limitation contained in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Awards under our 2010 Plan shall be designed, granted, and administered in such a manner that they are either exempt from the application of, or comply with, the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

67


Table of Contents

Fiscal Year 2010 Director Compensation

The following table summarizes compensation that our directors earned during fiscal year 2010 for services as members of our board of directors.

 

Name(1)

   Fees Earned or Paid in Cash    Option Awards    Stock Awards    Total

P. Michael Miller

   $ 81,000    n/a    n/a    $ 81,000

Robert J. Hall

     80,500    n/a    n/a      80,500

 

(1) We did not pay our employee directors, Ms. Miller and Ms. Bradley Baekgaard, any cash compensation for their service on our board of directors in fiscal year 2010.

Summary of Director Compensation

During fiscal year 2010, we paid our non-employee directors a base cash retainer of $70,000 and meeting fees of $1,000 per meeting ($500 for telephonic meetings). All of our directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the board of directors and its committees.

In fiscal year 2011, our outside compensation consultant reviewed our cash compensation for non-employee directors. In reviewing total compensation for our non-employee directors, our consultant evaluated the cash compensation programs and long-term equity incentive programs for non-employee directors of comparable companies. Beginning July 1, 2010, we will be providing a revised cash compensation program to our non-employee directors, including Mr. Miller, Mr. Hall, and a new non-employee director, Mr. John Kyees, who became a member of the board of directors in April 2010.

We will pay each of our non-employee directors a cash retainer of $34,000 annually, a per board of directors meeting fee of $2,000 ($500 for telephonic meetings) and a per committee meeting fee of $2,000. In addition, if such directors are not employees, we will pay our audit committee chair an additional retainer of $8,750 and each of our other committee chairs an additional retainer of $5,000. Finally, if such chairperson is not an employee, we will pay the chairperson of our board of directors an additional $40,000 retainer.

We intend to award long-term equity incentives in the form of restricted shares as part of our overall compensation program for our non-employee directors prior to this offering, as discussed in “— Pre-IPO Equity Grants” above. Under the 2010 Plan, our non-employee directors will also be eligible to receive stock option and other equity grants at the discretion of our compensation committee or other administrator of the 2010 Plan. See “— 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan” above for a description of the 2010 Plan. We will pay each of our non-employee directors an annual equity grant with a value of $50,000.

 

68


Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

It is our intention to ensure that all future transactions between us and our directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their affiliates are approved by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of the independent and disinterested members of our board of directors, and are on terms no less favorable to us than those that we could obtain from unaffiliated third parties. As a public company following the completion of this offering, our audit committee will be responsible for reviewing the fairness of related party transactions in accordance with the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Our audit committee will operate under a written charter pursuant to which it must approve, prior to consummation, any related party transaction, which includes any transaction or series of similar transactions in which we are to be a participant, the amount exceeds $120,000 and a “related person” (as defined under SEC rules) has a direct or indirect material interest. Based on its consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, the audit committee will decide whether or not to approve the particular transaction and will generally approve only those transactions that are negotiated at arm’s length and have terms and conditions that are reasonable and customary.

Related Party Transactions for Calendar Year 2007, Fiscal Year 2009 and Fiscal Year 2010

Other than compensation agreements and other arrangements described under “Management” and the transactions described below, since February 1, 2007, there has not been, and there is not currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000 and in which any of our directors, executive officers, holders of more than five percent of any class of our voting securities or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. We believe that we have executed all of the transactions set forth below on terms no less favorable to us than we could have obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

Relationships with Baekgaard Ltd.

In May 2006, we entered into a licensing agreement with Baekgaard Ltd., a manufacturer of leather accessories, ties, pocket squares and cuff links, pursuant to which we licensed certain of our copyrighted patterns. Baekgaard Ltd. is owned solely by Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and she serves as chairman of its board of directors. Robert J. Hall serves as secretary and treasurer of Baekgaard Ltd. Under the licensing agreement, we earned licensing revenues from Baekgaard Ltd. of $27,346, $22,757 and $9,400 for calendar year 2007, fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, respectively. The licensing agreement was terminated on June 21, 2010.

In addition, from time to time, we purchase products from Baekgaard Ltd. for sale in our stores. As consideration, we paid Baekgaard Ltd. $308,617, $260,764 and $118,928 for calendar year 2007, fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, respectively. From time to time, Baekgaard Ltd. has purchased products from us. As consideration, Baekgaard Ltd. paid us $315,476, $761,105 and $43,019 for calendar year 2007, fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, respectively.

Leasing Arrangements

In February 1996, we entered into a lease with Milburn, LLC, a leasing company in which Barbara Bradley Baekgaard owns a 50% interest and Patricia R. Miller and P. Michael Miller each own a 25% interest, for our corporate headquarters located at 2208 Production Road, Fort Wayne, Indiana. Lease expenses for calendar year 2007, fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, related to this arrangement with Milburn, LLC, were $168,000, $168,000 and $168,000, respectively.

Certain Employees of the Company

Joanie Hall, the daughter of Barbara Bradley Baekgaard, wife of Robert J. Hall and sister-in-law of Michael C. Ray, has been engaged by us to serve as an independent sales representative and has provided us with freelance artwork. For calendar year 2007, Joanie Hall received compensation of $237,944 for her service as an independent sales representative. For fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, she received compensation of $4,073 and $20,916, respectively, for her services as a freelance artist.

 

69


Table of Contents

Joan Reedy, the sister of Barbara Bradley Baekgaard, is employed by us in a public relations role. As the daughter of our namesake, Vera Bradley, she attends retail events to share our history with our customers. For calendar year 2007, Joan Reedy received compensation of $651,120 for her service as an independent sales representative and, for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, she received compensation of $138,849 and $118,792, respectively, for her service as an Indirect sales consultant.

Kathleen Ray, the sister-in-law of Michael C. Ray, is employed by us as an Indirect sales consultant, and previously was engaged by us as an independent sales representative. For calendar year 2007, we paid her, through a company solely owned by her, $154,522 for independent sales representative services. In calendar year 2007, fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, she received compensation of $21,670, $122,618 and $139,359, respectively, for her service as an Indirect sales consultant.

Relationships Among Members of our Board of Directors and Management

Several members of our board of directors and our management team are related to one another. P. Michael Miller is the husband of Patricia R. Miller. Robert J. Hall and Michael C. Ray are sons-in-law of Barbara Bradley Baekgaard. Accordingly, Robert J. Hall and Michael C. Ray are brothers-in-law.

Loans to the Company

In February 2003, we entered into four note agreements with Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia Miller, including a 10% note payable to Patricia R. Miller in the original amount of $1,500,000, a 10% note payable to Barbara Bradley Baekgaard in the original amount of $1,500,000, a 7% note payable to Patricia R. Miller in the original amount of $2,011,238 and a 7% note payable to Barbara Bradley Baekgaard in the original amount of $2,013,238. As of January 31, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding on these notes.

Shareholder Agreements

Our shareholders, Barbara Bradley Baekgaard, Patricia R. Miller, Jill A. Nichols, Michael C. Ray and Kimberly F. Colby, entered into an Amended and Restated Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement Re Non-Voting Shares dated February 23, 2003 and certain amendments thereto, pursuant to which non-selling shareholders were granted the right of first refusal with respect to any sale of Class B non-voting common stock owned by Jill A. Nichols, Michael C. Ray and Kimberly F. Colby.

In addition, the shareholders entered into an Amended and Restated Surviving Rights Under Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement Re Voting Shares dated November 13, 2007, pursuant to which the non-selling voting shareholder, followed by the non-voting shareholders, were granted the right of first refusal with respect to any sale of common stock by a voting shareholder.

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia R. Miller also entered into a Voting Agreement re Disability — Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. Voting Stock on September 25, 2003, by which each agreed that if she became totally disabled (as defined in the Agreement), Jill A. Nichols, Michael C. Ray and Kimberly F. Colby, acting by majority vote, would vote the disabled voting shareholder’s shares.

We anticipate these agreements will terminate on or prior to the completion of this offering.

Indemnification Agreements and Directors and Officers Liability Insurance

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation will provide for indemnification, to the fullest extent permitted by the IBCL, of our directors and officers against liability and reasonable expenses that may be incurred by them in connection with proceedings to which the directors or officers are made a party by reason of their relationship to the company. A general description of these provisions is contained under the heading “Description of Capital Stock — Exculpation from Liability of Directors in Certain Circumstances.” In addition, we intend to obtain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance to provide our directors and officers with insurance coverage for losses arising from claims based on breaches of duty, negligence, errors and other wrongful acts. We also intend to enter into agreements to indemnify our directors and executive officers.

 

70


Table of Contents

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding ownership of our common stock prior to and after this offering by:

 

  ¡  

each person known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;

 

  ¡  

each of our executive officers named in the summary compensation table;

 

  ¡  

each of our directors;

 

  ¡  

all of our executive officers and directors as a group; and

 

  ¡  

each selling shareholder.

The table below assumes the completion of the reorganization transaction and the shareholders of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. contributing all of their equity interests, including Class A voting common stock and Class B non-voting common stock, in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. to us in return for shares of our common stock on a     -for-     basis. As of                     , 2010, after giving effect to such transactions but before the sale of shares in this offering, we will have              shares of common stock outstanding. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power as to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed below is c/o Vera Bradley, Inc., 2208 Production Road, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46808.

 

71


Table of Contents
         Number of
shares of
common stock
to be sold

in this offering
  Number of
shares of
common stock
to be sold
pursuant to
over-allotment
option(1)
   
    Shares of capital stock
beneficially owned immediately
prior to this offering
           Shares of common stock
beneficially owned after this
offering

Name of beneficial owner

  Shares   Options   Total   %            Shares   Options   Total   %

Directors and Named Executive Officers

                    

Barbara Bradley Baekgaard(2)

        40%             

Robert J. Hall

        —               

John E. Kyees

        —               

Patricia R. Miller(3)

        40%             

P. Michael Miller(3)

        40%             

Michael C. Ray(4)

        5%             

Kimberly F. Colby(5)

        5%             

Jill A. Nichols(6)

        10%             

David R. Traylor

        —               

Directors and Executive Officers as a Group

        100%             

 

(1) Assumes the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares from the selling shareholders.

 

(2) Includes              shares held by the Barbara Baekgaard Annuity Trust.

 

(3) P. Michael Miller and Patricia R. Miller are husband and wife. Includes              shares held by the Patricia Miller 2007 Annuity Trust,              shares held by the Miller 2007 Dynasty Trust,              shares held by the Michael Miller 2009 Annuity Trust,              shares held by the Michael Miller 2009 Annuity Trust and              shares held by P. Michael Miller, the husband of Patricia R. Miller.

 

(4) Includes              shares held by the Michael Ray 2009 Annuity Trust.

 

(5) Includes              shares held by the Colby Gift Trust and              shares held by the Colby 2009 Annuity Trust.

 

(6) Includes              shares held by the Nichols Gift Trust and              shares held by the Nichols 2009 Annuity Trust.

The selling shareholders participating in the distribution of the shares sold in this offering may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act. Because the selling shareholders hold restricted securities, any public sales by them not effected pursuant to Rule 144 will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the selling shareholders for the purpose of satisfying the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act.

 

72


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

General

Upon the closing of this offering, the total amount of our authorized capital stock will consist of              shares of common stock, without par value, and              shares of preferred stock, without par value. The discussion herein describes the reorganization transaction and also describes our capital stock, amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws as anticipated to be in effect upon the closing of this offering. The following description of our capital stock is intended to be a summary and does not describe all provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation or our amended and restated by-laws or the IBCL. For a more thorough understanding of the terms of our capital stock, we refer you to our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws, which are included as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Reorganization Transaction

Vera Bradley, Inc. is a newly-formed Indiana corporation that has not, to date, conducted any activities other than those incident to our formation and the preparation of this prospectus. We were formed solely for the purpose of reorganizing the corporate structure of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc.

We expect the shareholders of Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. will contribute all of their equity interests in Vera Bradley Designs, Inc., including Shares of Class A voting common stock and Class B non-voting common stock, to us in return for shares of our common stock on a     -for-     basis. As a result, Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. will become our wholly-owned subsidiary.

Common Stock

Following the reorganization transaction and immediately prior to the closing of this offering, there will be             shares of common stock outstanding held by              holders of record. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters subject to a vote of shareholders, subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding preferred stock. Accordingly, holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all of the directors standing for election, subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of common stock will be entitled to receive ratably any dividends that the board of directors may declare out of funds legally available therefrom, subject to any preferential dividend rights of outstanding preferred stock. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock will be entitled to receive ratably our net assets available after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of holders of any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. All outstanding shares of our capital stock are fully paid and nonassessable, and the shares of common stock to be issued upon the closing of this offering will be fully paid and nonassessable.

Preferred Stock

Following the reorganization transaction and immediately prior to the closing of this offering, we will be authorized to issue shares of preferred stock, which may be issued from time to time in one or more series upon authorization by the board of directors. The board of directors, without further approval of the shareholders, will be authorized to fix the number of shares constituting any series, as well as the dividend rights and terms, conversion rights and terms, voting rights and terms, redemption rights and terms, liquidation preferences and any other rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions applicable to each series of preferred stock. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could also adversely affect the voting power and dividend and liquidation rights of the holders of common stock. The issuance of preferred stock could also, under certain circumstances, have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of our outstanding voting stock or otherwise adversely affect the market price of our common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock on the rights of holders of common stock until the board of directors determines the specific rights of that series of preferred stock.

 

73


Table of Contents

Exculpation from Liability of Directors in Certain Circumstances

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation will provide for indemnification of our directors where they have acted in good faith, which means that in the case of official action, they reasonably believed the conduct was in our best interests and in all other cases, the action taken was not against our best interests, and in the case of criminal proceedings, they had reasonable cause to believe the action was lawful or there was no reasonable cause to believe the action was unlawful. Under the IBCL, a director is not liable for any action taken as a director, or any failure to act, regardless of the nature of the alleged breach of duty (including breaches of the duty of care, the duty of loyalty, and the duty of good faith) unless the director has breached or failed to perform the duties of the director’s office and the action or failure to act constitutes willful misconduct or recklessness. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation will not absolve directors of liability for payment of any unlawful distributions by us in violation of Section 23-1-35-4 (or any successor provision) of the IBCL, provided that such action constitutes willful misconduct or recklessness.

We do not believe that exculpation from liability under the IBCL affects the liability of our directors for violations of the federal securities laws. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws will also provide indemnification for the benefit of our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the IBCL, including most circumstances under which indemnification otherwise would be discretionary.

Number of Directors; Removal; Vacancies

Our amended and restated by-laws will provide that we are to have 11 directors, provided that this number may be changed by the board of directors. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation will provide that, subject to the rights of holders of any future series of preferred stock, directors may be removed, with or without cause, at meetings of shareholders by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to be cast generally in the election of directors.

Our board of directors will be divided into three classes that will be, as nearly as possible, of equal size. Each class of directors will be elected for a three-year term of office, but the terms are staggered so that the term of only one class of directors expires at each annual meeting of shareholders. The proposed terms of the Class I, Class II and Class III directors will expire in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The Class I directors will include            , the Class II directors will include             and the Class III directors will include            . Vacancies on the board of directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office.

Special Meetings of Shareholders; Limitations on Shareholder Action by Written Consent

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation will provide that special meetings of our shareholders may be called only by our chairman of the board of directors, our chief executive officer or our board of directors. The only matters that may be considered at any special meeting of the shareholders are the matters specified in the notice of the meeting. Any action required or permitted to be taken by our shareholders must be effected at an annual or special meeting of shareholders and may not be effected by written consent unless the action is evidenced by one or more written consents describing the action taken and signed by all shareholders entitled to vote on the action.

Amendments; Vote Requirements

Certain provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws will provide that a proposal to amend our amended and restated articles of incorporation or amended and restated by-laws will be approved if the votes cast favoring the proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal at a meeting at which a quorum is present. However, amendments to provisions relating to the ability of shareholders to call special meetings require the vote of at least 66 2/3% of the shares entitled to vote on such matters.

Authorized but Unissued Shares

The authorized but unissued shares of common stock will be available for future issuance without shareholder approval. These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise

 

74


Table of Contents

additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock could render it more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

Advance Notice Requirements for Shareholder Proposals and Nomination of Directors

Our amended and restated by-laws will provide that shareholders seeking to bring business before an annual meeting of shareholders, or to nominate candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting of shareholders, must provide timely notice in writing. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at our principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. However, in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, such notice will be timely only if received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed to shareholders or made public, whichever first occurs. Our amended and restated by-laws will also specify requirements as to the form and content of a shareholder’s notice.

Certain Provisions of the Indiana Business Corporation Law

As an Indiana corporation, we are governed by the IBCL. Under specified circumstances, the following provisions of the IBCL may delay, prevent or make more difficult unsolicited acquisitions or changes of control of us. These provisions also may have the effect of preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions which shareholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interest.

Control Share Acquisitions.  Under Chapter 42 of the IBCL, an acquiring person or group who makes a “control share acquisition” in an “issuing public corporation” may not exercise voting rights on any “control shares” unless these voting rights are conferred by a majority vote of the disinterested shareholders of the issuing public corporation at a special meeting of those shareholders held upon the request and at the expense of the acquiring person. If control shares acquired in a control share acquisition are accorded full voting rights and the acquiring person has acquired control shares with a majority or more of all voting power, all shareholders of the issuing public corporation have dissenters’ rights to receive the fair value of their shares pursuant to Chapter 44 of the IBCL.

Under the IBCL, “control shares” are shares acquired by a person that, when added to all other shares of the issuing public corporation owned by that person or in respect to which that person may exercise or direct the exercise of voting power, would otherwise entitle that person to exercise voting power of the issuing public corporation in the election of directors within any of the following ranges:

 

  ¡  

one-fifth or more but less than one-third;

 

  ¡  

one-third or more but less than a majority; or

 

  ¡  

a majority or more.

A “control share acquisition” means, subject to specified exceptions, the acquisition, directly or indirectly, by any person of ownership of, or the power to direct the exercise of voting power with respect to, issued and outstanding control shares. For the purposes of determining whether an acquisition constitutes a control share acquisition, shares acquired within 90 days or under a plan to make a control share acquisition are considered to have been acquired in the same acquisition.

An “issuing public corporation” means a corporation which has (i) 100 or more shareholders, (ii) its principal place of business or its principal office in Indiana, or that owns or controls assets within Indiana having a fair market value of greater than $1,000,000, and (iii) (A) more than 10% of its shareholders resident in Indiana, (B) more than 10% of its shares owned of record or owned beneficially by Indiana residents, or (C) 1,000 shareholders resident in Indiana.

 

75


Table of Contents

The provisions described above do not apply if, before a control share acquisition is made, the corporation’s articles of incorporation or by-laws, including a by-law adopted by the corporation’s board of directors, provide that they do not apply. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and our amended and restated by-laws will not, upon the closing, exclude us from Chapter 42.

Certain Business Combinations.  Chapter 43 of the IBCL restricts the ability of a “resident domestic corporation” to engage in any combinations with an “interested shareholder” for five years after the date the interested shareholder became such, unless the combination or the purchase of shares by the interested shareholder on the interested shareholder’s date of acquiring shares is approved by the board of directors of the resident domestic corporation before that date. If the combination was not previously approved, then the interested shareholder may effect a combination after the five-year period only if that shareholder receives approval from a majority of the disinterested shareholders or the offer meets specified “fair price” criteria.

For purposes of the above provisions, “resident domestic corporation” means an Indiana corporation that has 100 or more shareholders. “Interested shareholder” means any person, other than the resident domestic corporation or its subsidiaries, who is (1) the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting shares of the resident domestic corporation or (2) an affiliate or associate of the resident domestic corporation, which at any time within the five-year period immediately before the date in question, was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of the resident domestic corporation.

The definition of “beneficial owner” for purposes of Chapter 43 means a person who, directly or indirectly, owns the shares, has the right to acquire or vote the subject shares (excluding voting rights under revocable proxies made in accordance with federal law), has any agreement, arrangement or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding or voting or disposing of the subject shares, or holds any “derivative instrument” that includes the opportunity, directly or indirectly, to profit or share in any profit derived from any increase in the value of the subject shares.

The above provisions do not apply to corporations that elect not to be subject to Chapter 43 in an amendment to their articles of incorporation approved by a majority of the disinterested shareholders. That amendment, however, cannot become effective until 18 months after its passage and would apply only to share acquisitions occurring after its effective date. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation do not exclude us from Chapter 43.

Directors’ Duties and Liability.  Under Chapter 35 of the IBCL, directors are required to discharge their duties:

 

  ¡  

in good faith;

 

  ¡  

with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances; and

 

  ¡  

in a manner the directors reasonably believe to be in the best interests of the corporation.

Under the IBCL, a director is not liable for any action taken as a director, or any failure to act, regardless of the nature of the alleged breach of duty (including breaches of the duty of care, the duty of loyalty, and the duty of good faith) unless the director has breached or failed to perform the duties of the director’s office and the action or failure to act constitutes willful misconduct or recklessness. This exculpation from liability under the IBCL does not affect the liability of directors for violations of the federal securities laws.

Consideration of Effects on Other Constituents.  Chapter 35 of the IBCL also provides that a board of directors, in discharging its duties, may consider, in its discretion, both the long-term and short-term best interests of the corporation, taking into account, and weighing as the directors deem appropriate, the effects of an action on the corporation’s shareholders, employees, suppliers and customers and the communities in which offices or other facilities of the corporation are located and any other factors the directors consider pertinent. Directors are not required to consider the effects of a proposed corporate action on any particular corporate constituent group or interest as a dominant or controlling factor. If a determination is made with the approval of a majority of the disinterested directors of the board of directors, that determination is conclusively presumed to be valid unless it can be demonstrated that the determination was not made in good faith after reasonable investigation.

 

76


Table of Contents

Chapter 35 specifically provides that specified judicial decisions in Delaware and other jurisdictions, which might be looked upon for guidance in interpreting Indiana law, including decisions that propose a higher or different degree of scrutiny in response to a proposed acquisition of the corporation, are inconsistent with the proper application of the business judgment rule under that section.

Mandatory Classified Board of Directors.  Under Section 23-1-33-6(c) of the IBCL, a corporation with a class of voting shares registered with the SEC under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), must have a classified board of directors unless the corporation adopts a by-law expressly electing not to be governed by this provision by the later of July 31, 2009 or 30 days after the corporation’s voting shares are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. Although we intend to have a classified board of directors, our amended and restated by-laws will include a provision electing not to be subject to this mandatory requirement; however, the IBCL permits this election to be rescinded by subsequent action of our board of directors.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is            .

Listing

Our common stock will be listed on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “    ”.

 

77


Table of Contents

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Upon completion of this offering, we will have approximately             million shares of common stock outstanding. Of these shares, the             shares sold in this offering, plus any shares sold upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act, except for any shares held by our “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. In general, affiliates include executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders. Shares held by affiliates will remain subject to the resale limitations of Rule 144.

The remaining shares of common stock outstanding following this offering will be “restricted securities” as that term is defined in Rule 144. We issued and sold these restricted securities in private transactions in reliance on exemptions from registration under the Securities Act. Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if they are registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration such as under Rule 144 or 701 under the Securities Act, as summarized below.

We have agreed with the underwriters that we will not, without the prior written consent of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, issue any additional shares of common stock or securities convertible into, exercisable for or exchangeable for shares of common stock for a period of 180 days (subject to extensions) after the date of this prospectus, except that we may grant options to purchase shares of common stock under the 2010 Plan and issue shares of common stock upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants.

Our officers and directors and our other shareholders, who will hold an aggregate of              shares of common stock upon completion of this offering, have agreed that they will not, without the prior written consent of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, offer, sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for, or any rights to acquire or purchase, any of our common stock, or publicly announce an intention to effect any of these transactions, for a period of 180 days (subject to extensions) after the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, except that nothing will prevent any of them from exercising outstanding options and warrants. These lock-up agreements are subject to such shareholders’ rights to transfer their shares of common stock as a bona fide gift or to a trust for the benefit of an immediate family member or to a wholly-owned subsidiary, provided that such donee or transferee agrees in writing to be bound by the terms of the lock-up agreement.

We have been advised by Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated that it may in its discretion waive the lock-up agreements but that it has no current intention of releasing any shares subject to a lock-up agreement. The release of any lock-up would be considered case by case. In considering any request to release shares covered by a lock-up agreement, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated may consider, among other factors, the particular circumstances surrounding the request, including but not limited to the number of shares requested to be released, market conditions, the possible impact on the market for our common stock, the trading price of our common stock, historical trading volumes of our common stock, the reasons for the request and whether the person seeking the release is one of our officers or directors. No agreement has been made between Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated and us or any of our shareholders pursuant to which Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated will waive the lock-up restrictions.

Taking into account the lock-up agreements, and assuming Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated does not release shareholders from these agreements, approximately              of our shares will be eligible for sale in the public market subject to volume, manner of sale, and other limitations under Rules 144 and 701 beginning 180 days after the date of this prospectus (unless the lock-up period is extended as described above and in “Underwriting”).

In general, under Rule 144, a shareholder has beneficially owned restricted securities of an issuer that has been subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for at least six months, and who is not affiliated with the issuer, is entitled to sell an unlimited number of shares of common stock so long as the issuer has satisfied its public information disclosure requirements. In addition, an affiliate of the issuer who has beneficially owned restricted securities for at least six months is entitled to sell, within any three-month period, a number of restricted shares that does not exceed the greater of:

 

  ¡  

one percent of the then outstanding number of shares of common stock; or

 

  ¡  

the average weekly trading volume of the common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market during the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.

 

78


Table of Contents

Sales under Rule 144 also are subject to requirements with respect to manner of sale, notice and the availability of current public information about us.

Under Rule 701, each of our employees, officers, directors and consultants who acquired shares pursuant to a written compensatory plan or contract is eligible to resell those shares beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus in reliance upon Rule 144. Affiliates may resell their Rule 701 shares under Rule 144 without complying with the holding period requirement of Rule 144. Non-affiliates may resell their Rule 701 shares without complying with the holding period or current public information requirements of Rule 144.

We intend to file a registration statement under the Securities Act as soon as practicable after the completion of this offering to cover the resale of shares issued upon the exercise of options granted, and of shares granted, under the 2010 Plan. As a result, any shares issued or optioned under the 2010 Plan after the completion of this offering also will be freely tradable in the public market.

 

79


Table of Contents

CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U.S. HOLDERS

The following discussion summarizes certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common stock by a Non-U.S. Holder (as defined below). This summary is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, administrative rulings, and judicial decisions as in effect on the date hereof. All such authorities may be repealed, revoked, or modified, possibly with retroactive effect, so as to result in different U.S. federal income tax consequences than those discussed herein. There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) will not take a contrary position to the discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences discussed herein or such position will not be sustained by a court. No ruling from the IRS or opinion of counsel has been obtained with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning or disposing of the common stock.

The following discussion deals only with Non-U.S. Holders holding shares of our common stock as capital assets as of the date of this prospectus. The following discussion also does not address considerations that may be relevant to certain Non-U.S. Holders that are subject to special rules, such as the following:

 

  ¡  

controlled foreign corporations;

 

  ¡  

passive foreign investment companies;

 

  ¡  

corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, brokers or dealers in securities or currencies;

 

  ¡  

holders of securities held as part of a hedge or a position in a “straddle,” conversion transaction, risk reduction transaction, or constructive sale transaction; or

 

  ¡  

certain former citizens or long-term residents of the U.S. that are subject to special treatment under the Code.

The following discussion also does not address entities that are taxed as partnerships or similar pass-through entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If a partnership or other pass-through entity holds common stock, the tax treatment of the partnership (or other pass-through entity) and its partners (or owners) will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships (and other pass-through entities) and their partners (and owners) should consult with their own tax advisors to determine the tax consequences of owning or disposing of common stock.

The following discussion does not address any non-income tax consequences of acquiring, owning or disposing of common stock or any income tax consequences under state, local, or foreign law. Potential purchasers are urged to consult their own tax advisors to discuss the tax consequences of acquiring, owning or disposing of common stock based on their particular situation, including non-income tax consequences and tax consequences under state, local, and foreign law.

Non-U.S. Holder

As used in this discussion, a “Non-U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is not any of the following for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

 

  ¡  

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;

 

  ¡  

a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that was created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

  ¡  

an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source;

 

  ¡  

a trust (i) if it is subject to the supervision of a court within the U.S. and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) that has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or

 

  ¡  

an entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner if all of its interests are owned by a single person described above.

 

80


Table of Contents

Dividends

As discussed under the section entitled “Dividend Policy” above, we do not currently anticipate paying dividends. In the event that we do make distributions on our common stock, such distributions paid to a Non-U.S. Holder will generally constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent such distributions are paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. If a distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be treated as a tax-free return of the Non-U.S. Holder’s investment to the extent of the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in our common stock. Any remaining excess will be treated as capital gain from a sale or disposition of such common stock, reduced by the amount of any tax-free return of capital. See “— Gain on Disposition of Common Stock” for additional information.

Dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. A Non-U.S. Holder of common stock who wishes to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty rate for dividends will be required to (a) complete IRS Form W-8BEN (or appropriate substitute form) and certify, under penalty of perjury, that such holder is (or, in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is an estate or trust, such forms certifying the status of each beneficiary of the estate or trust as) not a U.S. person and is eligible for the benefits with respect to dividends allowed by such treaty or (b) hold common stock through certain foreign intermediaries and satisfy the certification requirements for treaty benefits of applicable Treasury regulations. Special certification requirements apply to certain Non-U.S. Holders that act as intermediaries (including partnerships). A Non-U.S. Holder eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.

This U.S. withholding tax generally will not apply to dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the Non-U.S. Holder within the U.S., and, in cases in which certain tax treaties apply, attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base of the Non-U.S. Holder. Dividends effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business, and, in cases in which certain tax treaties apply, attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base of the Non-U.S. Holder, are subject to U.S. federal income tax generally in the same manner as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a U.S. person, as defined under the Code. Certain IRS certification and disclosure requirements, including delivery of a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI, must be complied with in order for effectively connected dividends to be exempt from withholding. Any such effectively connected dividends received by a Non-U.S. Holder that is a foreign corporation may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

Gain on Disposition of Common Stock

A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax (or any withholding thereof) with respect to gain recognized on a sale or other disposition of common stock unless:

 

  ¡  

the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of the Non-U.S. Holder in the U.S. and, in cases in which certain tax treaties apply, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base of the Non-U.S. Holder;

 

  ¡  

the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the U.S. for 183 or more days during the taxable year of disposition and meets certain other requirements; or

 

  ¡  

we are or have been a “U.S. real property holding corporation” within the meaning of Section 897(c)(2) of the Code, also referred to as a USRPHC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time within the five-year period preceding the disposition (or, if shorter, the Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common stock).

Gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of common stock and effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, and, in cases in which certain tax treaties apply, attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base of the Non-U.S. Holder, is subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis generally in the same manner as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a U.S. person, as defined under the Code. Any such effectively connected gain from the sale or disposition of common stock received by a Non-U.S. Holder that is a foreign corporation may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

 

81


Table of Contents

An individual Non-U.S. Holder who is present in the U.S. for 183 or more days during the taxable year of disposition generally will be subject to a 30% tax imposed on the gain derived from the sale or disposition of our common stock, which may be offset by U.S. source capital loses realized in the same taxable year.

We believe that we currently are not a USRPHC, and we do not anticipate becoming a USRPHC for United States federal income tax purposes. However, no assurances can be provided in this regard.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

We must report annually to the IRS and to each Non-U.S. Holder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the Non-U.S. Holder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.

The U.S. imposes a backup withholding tax on dividends and certain other types of payments to U.S. persons (currently at a rate of 28%) of the gross amount. Dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to backup withholding if proper certification of foreign status (usually on an IRS Form W-8BEN) is provided, and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a U.S. person, or the holder is a corporation or one of several types of entities and organizations that qualify for exemption, also referred to as an exempt recipient.

The payment of the proceeds from the disposition of common stock to or through the U.S. office of any broker (U.S. or non-U.S.) will be subject to information reporting and possible backup withholding unless the Non-U.S. Holder certifies as to such holder’s non-U.S. status under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an exemption and the broker does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the Non-U.S. Holder is a U.S. person or that the conditions of an other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied. The payment of proceeds from the disposition of common stock to or through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding unless the non-U.S. broker has certain types of relationships with the United States (a “U.S. related financial intermediary”). In the case of the payment of proceeds from the disposition of common stock to or through a non-U.S. office of a broker that is either a U.S. person or a U.S. related financial intermediary, the Treasury Regulations require information reporting (but not backup withholding) on the payment unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that the owner is a Non-U.S. Holder and the broker has no knowledge to the contrary. Holders of common stock are urged to consult their tax advisor on the application of information reporting and backup withholding in light of their particular circumstances.

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Recently Enacted Withholding Legislation

Newly enacted legislation may impose withholding taxes on certain types of payments made to “foreign financial institutions” and certain other non-U.S. entities after December 31, 2012. The legislation imposes a 30% withholding tax on dividends on, or gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, common stock paid to a foreign financial institution unless the foreign financial institution enters into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury to, among other things, undertake to identify accounts held by certain U.S. persons (including certain equity and debt holders of such institutions) or U.S.-owned foreign entities, annually report certain information about such accounts, and withhold 30% on payments to account holders whose actions prevent it from complying with these reporting and other requirements. In addition, the legislation imposes a 30% withholding tax on the same types of payments to a foreign non-financial entity unless the entity certifies that it does not have any substantial U.S. owners (which generally includes any U.S. person who directly or indirectly own more than 10% of the entity) or furnishes identifying information regarding each substantial U.S. owner. Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding this legislation.

THIS SUMMARY OF MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES ABOVE IS INCLUDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. POTENTIAL PURCHASERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS TO DETERMINE THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX CONSIDERATIONS OF ACQUIRING, OWNING AND DISPOSING OF THE COMMON STOCK.

 

82


Table of Contents

UNDERWRITING

Under an underwriting agreement dated             , 2010, we and the selling shareholders, which selling shareholders may be deemed to be underwriters, have agree to sell to the underwriters named below, subject to certain conditions, the indicated numbers of shares of our common stock:

 

Underwriters

  

Number of Shares

Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated

  
  
    

Total

  
    

The underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the shares being offered, if any are taken, other than the shares covered by the option described below unless and until this option is exercised.

If the underwriters sell more shares than the total number set forth in the table above, the underwriters have an option to buy up to an additional              shares from the selling shareholders to cover such sales. They may exercise that option for 30 days. If any shares are purchased pursuant to this option, the underwriters will severally purchase shares in approximately the same proportion as set forth in the table above.

The following tables show the per share and total underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters by us and the selling shareholders. Such amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares from the selling shareholders.

 

     Per Share    Total
     Without Over-
Allotment
   With Over-
Allotment
   Without Over-
Allotment
   With Over-
Allotment

Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us

   $                 $                 $                 $             

Underwriting and commissions paid by selling shareholders

   $      $      $      $  

In addition, we estimate that the total expenses of this offering, including registration, filing and listing fees, printing fees and legal and accounting expenses, but excluding the underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately $             million.

Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be offered at the initial public offering price set forth on the cover of this prospectus. Any shares sold by the underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a discount of up to $             per share from the initial public offering price. Any such securities dealers may resell any shares purchased from the underwriters to certain other brokers or dealers at a discount of up to $             per share from the initial public offering price. If all the shares are not sold at the initial public offering price, the representatives may change the offering price and the other selling terms.

The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales to discretionary accounts to exceed 5% of the total number of shares of common stock offered by them.

We and our executive officers and directors and the holders of all of our common stock have agreed with the underwriters not to dispose of or hedge any of their common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock during the period from the date of this prospectus continuing through the date 180 days after the date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated or in other limited circumstances. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale” for a discussion of certain transfer restrictions.

The 180-day restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be extended if:

 

  ¡  

during the last 17 days of the 180-day restricted period, we issue an earnings release or announce material news or a material event; or

 

  ¡  

prior to the expiration of the 180-day restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the 180-day period,

 

83


Table of Contents

in which case the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the announcement of the material news or material event.

The underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial public offering price up to              shares of the common stock for employees and directors who have expressed an interest in purchasing common stock in the offering. The maximum number of shares that a participant may purchase in the reserved share program is limited to the participant’s pro rata allocation of the shares based on the number of shares for which the participant subscribed. The number of shares available for sale to the general public in the offering will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase the reserved shares. Any reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the other shares.

Any persons that choose to participate in the reserved share program will agree with us that, until             ,             , they will not, unless permitted by us to do so, offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, grant any option to purchase, make any short sale or otherwise dispose of any shares they purchase through the program.

Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for the shares. The initial public offering price will be negotiated among us, the selling shareholders and Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated. Among the factors to be considered in determining the initial public offering price of the shares, in addition to prevailing market conditions, will be our historical performance, estimates of our business potential and earnings prospects, an assessment of our management and the consideration of the above factors in relation to market valuation of companies in related businesses.

Application has been made to list the common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “            .”

The underwriters have in the past and may in the future perform investment banking and advisory services for us from time to time for which they have in the past received and may in the future receive customary fees and expenses.

We and the selling shareholders have agreed or will agree to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities under the Securities Act or contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to make in that respect.

In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate covering transactions, and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.

Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum.

Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short position may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option. The underwriters may close out any covered short position by exercising their over-allotment option or by purchasing shares in the open market (or both).

Syndicate-covering transactions involve purchases of the common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In determining the source of shares to close out the short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares than could be covered by the over-allotment option (a naked short position), the position can only be closed out by buying shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors that purchase in the offering.

 

84


Table of Contents

Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the common stock originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short positions. Stabilization and syndicate covering transactions may cause the price of the shares to be higher than it would be in the absence of these transactions. The imposition of a penalty bid might also have an effect on the price of the shares if it discourages presale of the shares.

These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market.

These transactions may be effected on The Nasdaq Global Market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area that has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a “relevant member state”) and the shares offered by this prospectus, with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that relevant member state (the “relevant implementation date”) an offer of securities to the public may not be made in that relevant member state prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the securities that has been approved by the competent authority in that relevant member state or, where appropriate, approved in another relevant member state and notified to the competent authority in that relevant member state, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that, with effect from and including the relevant implementation date, an offer of securities may be offered to the public in that relevant member state at any time:

 

  ¡  

to any legal entity that is authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;

 

  ¡  

to any legal entity that has two or more of (1) an average of at least 250 employees during the last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts; or

 

  ¡  

in any other circumstances that do not require the publication of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.

Each purchaser of securities described in this prospectus located within a relevant member state will be deemed to have represented, acknowledged and agreed that it is a “qualified investor” within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive.

For purposes of this prospectus, the expression an “offer of securities to the public” in any relevant member state means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the securities to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the securities, as the expression may be varied in that member state by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that member state, and the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in each relevant member state.

The sellers of the securities have not authorized and do not authorize the making of any offer of securities through any financial intermediary on their behalf, other than offers made by the underwriters with a view to the final placement of the securities as contemplated in this prospectus. Accordingly, no purchaser of the securities, other than the underwriters, is authorized to make any further offer of the securities on behalf of the sellers or the underwriters.

This prospectus is only being distributed to, and is only directed at, persons in the United Kingdom that are (i) investment professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Order”) or (ii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated, falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”).

This prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or disclosed by recipients to any other persons in the United Kingdom. Any person in the United Kingdom that is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this document or any of its contents.

 

85


Table of Contents

LEGAL MATTERS

Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for us by Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, Illinois. The validity of the securities and certain other legal matters relating to Indiana law will be passed upon for us by Baker & Daniels LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the underwriters by Foley & Lardner LLP, Chicago, Illinois.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements as of January 31, 2009, and January 31, 2010 and for the years ending January 31, 2010, January 30, 2009 and December 31, 2007 and the one month period ended January 31, 2008, included in this prospectus have been so included in the reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC relating to the common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance we refer you to the copy of the contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. For further information with respect to our company and the common stock offered by this prospectus, we refer you to the registration statement, exhibits and schedules. Anyone may inspect a copy of the registration statement without charge at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from that facility upon payment of the prescribed fees. The public may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.

We intend to make available free of charge on our website at www.verabradley.com our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, proxy statements, and other information as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website is not part of this prospectus.

 

86


Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 30, 2010 and May 1, 2010

   F-2

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal quarters ended May 2, 2009 and May 1, 2010

   F-3

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal quarters ended May 2, 2009 and May  1, 2010

   F-4

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of January 31, 2010 and May  1, 2010 and the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2009 and May 1, 2010

   F-5

Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-8

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2009 and January 30, 2010

   F-9

Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2007, one month period ended January  31, 2008 and fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and January 30, 2010

   F-10

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the year ended December  31, 2007, one month period ended January 31, 2008 and fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and January 30, 2010

   F-11

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December  31, 2007, one month period ended January 31, 2008 and fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and January 30, 2010

   F-12

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-13

 

 

Vera Bradley, Inc. is a newly-formed entity and does not currently have any assets or liabilities. An audited opening balance sheet for Vera Bradley, Inc. will be included in this prospectus before the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part is declared effective by the SEC.

 

F-1


Table of Contents

Vera Bradley Designs, Inc.

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets

($ in thousands, except numbers of shares and per share data)

 

 

     January 30, 2010    May 1, 2010

Assets

     

Current assets

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 6,509    $ 1,350

Accounts receivable, net

     31,013      37,640

Inventories

     66,535      72,758

Other current assets

     6,468      4,826
             

Total current assets

     110,525      116,574

Property, plant and equipment, net

     40,123      40,181

Other assets

     3,104      3,043
             

Total assets

   $ 153,752    $ 159,798
             

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

     

Current liabilities

     

Accounts payable

   $ 19,221    $ 21,599

Distributions payable

     1,091      1,091

Accrued employment costs

     14,181      8,065

Other accrued liabilities

     9,772      11,192

Current portion of long-term debt

     5,022      5,022
             

Total current liabilities

     49,287      46,969

Long-term debt

     25,114      29,858

Other long-term liabilities

     1,458      1,585
             

Total liabilities

     75,859      78,412
             

Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 6)

     

Shareholders’ equity