UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019

OR 

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-54675

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT, INC. 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

Maryland	27-1550167
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4890 West Kennedy Blvd., Suite 650 Tampa, FL 33609	(813) 287-0101
(Address of Principal Executive Offices; Zip Code)	(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
N/A	N/A	N/A

As of August 9, 2019, there were approximately 178,996,000 shares of common stock of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. outstanding.

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT, INC.

(A Maryland Corporation)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)	3
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	6
	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	41
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	41
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	43
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	43
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	43
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	47
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	49
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	49
Item 5.	Other Information	49
Item 6.	Exhibits	50
SIGNATURES

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

	(Unaudited) June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Real estate:
Land	$	72,451		$	72,700
Buildings and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $112,894 and $100,897, respectively	796,134			806,637
Total real estate, net	868,585			879,337
Cash and cash equivalents	28,202			43,133
Acquired intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $25,288 and $23,822, respectively	54,675			59,681
Right-of-use assets - operating leases	16,103			—
Other assets, net	45,905			40,964
Assets of discontinued operations, net	—			401
Total assets	$	1,013,470		$	1,023,516
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Notes payable, net of deferred financing costs of $65 and $75, respectively	$	17,654		$	36,214
Credit facility	231,000			190,000
Accounts payable due to affiliates	1,289			1,329
Accounts payable and other liabilities	17,982			16,703
Acquired intangible liabilities, less accumulated amortization of $5,330 and $5,712, respectively	10,920			16,537
Operating lease liabilities	19,808			—
Liabilities of discontinued operations, net	—			13
Total liabilities	298,653			260,796
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 204,769,944 and 203,114,678 shares issued, respectively; 179,208,640 and 183,081,839 shares outstanding, respectively	1,792			1,831
Additional paid-in capital	1,592,381			1,612,969
Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings	(879,133		)	(852,505		)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	(223		)	425
Total stockholders’ equity	714,817			762,720
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,013,470		$	1,023,516

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(in thousands, except share data and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018
Revenue:
Rental revenue	$	20,373		$	17,182		$	41,289		$	18,717
Expenses:
Rental expenses	1,949			2,960			3,558			5,960
General and administrative expenses	6,112			1,268			9,003			2,877
Asset management fees	2,400			2,479			4,804			4,944
Depreciation and amortization	7,304			7,245			16,097			36,066
Impairment loss on real estate	—			5,831			—			5,831
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions	3			(218		)	3			(218		)
Total expenses	17,768			19,565			33,465			55,460
Income (loss) from operations	2,605			(2,383		)	7,824			(36,743		)
Other expense:
Interest and other expense, net	(2,806		)	(2,984		)	(5,877		)	(5,198		)
Provision for loan losses	—			(989		)	—			(2,179		)
Total other expense	(2,806		)	(3,973		)	(5,877		)	(7,377		)
(Loss) income from continuing operations	(201		)	(6,356		)	1,947			(44,120		)
Income from discontinued operations	—			11,950			—			32,483
Net (loss) income	(201		)	5,594			1,947			(11,637		)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships	—			48			—			48
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(201	)	$	5,642		$	1,947		$	(11,589	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (loss) income on interest rate swaps, net	$	(362	)	$	(212	)	$	(648	)	$	424
Other comprehensive (loss) income	(362		)	(212		)	(648		)	424
Comprehensive (loss) income	(563		)	5,382			1,299			(11,213		)
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships	—			48			—			48
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(563	)	$	5,430		$	1,299		$	(11,165	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	179,408,235			181,128,292			180,010,221			183,388,291
Diluted	179,408,235			181,128,292			180,032,622			183,388,291
Net (loss) income per common share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic:
Continuing operations	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	0.01		$	(0.24	)
Discontinued operations	—			0.07			—			0.18
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	—		$	0.03		$	0.01		$	(0.06	)
Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	0.01		$	(0.24	)
Discontinued operations	—			0.07			—			0.18
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	—		$	0.03		$	0.01		$	(0.06	)
Distributions declared per common share	$	0.08		$	0.10		$	0.16		$	3.29

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT, INC. 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(in thousands, except share data) 

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock					Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
	No. of Shares		Par Value
Balance, December 31, 2017	186,181,545		$	1,862		$	1,635,329		$	(211,750	)	$	407		$	1,425,848		$	4,969		$	1,430,817
Vesting of restricted stock	—		—			23			—			—			23			—			23
Issuance of common stock under the distribution reinvestment plan	1,971,383		20			16,039			—			—			16,059			—			16,059
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—		—			—			—			—			—			(4,233		)	(4,233		)
Distributions to common stockholders	—		—			—			(583,896		)	—			(583,896		)	—			(583,896		)
Repurchase of common stock	(4,447,367	)	(45		)	(33,816		)	—			—			(33,861		)	—			(33,861		)
Other comprehensive income	—		—			—			—			636			636			—			636
Net loss	—		—			—			(17,231		)	—			(17,231		)	—			(17,231		)
Balance, March 31, 2018	183,705,561		$	1,837		$	1,617,575		$	(812,877	)	$	1,043		$	807,578		$	736		$	808,314
Vesting of restricted stock	4,500		—			22			—			—			22			—			22
Issuance of common stock under the distribution reinvestment plan	1,474,646		14			9,217			—			—			9,231			—			9,231
Distributions to common stockholders	—		—			—			(18,973		)	—			(18,973		)	—			(18,973		)
Other offering costs	—		—			(4		)	—			—			(4		)	—			(4		)
Repurchase of common stock	(4,861,710	)	(48		)	(30,303		)	—			—			(30,351		)	—			(30,351		)
Other comprehensive loss	—		—			—			—			(212		)	(212		)	—			(212		)
Net income	—		—			—			5,642			—			5,642			(48		)	5,594
Balance, June 30, 2018	180,322,997		$	1,803		$	1,596,507		$	(826,208	)	$	831		$	772,933		$	688		$	773,621

	Common Stock					Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	No. of Shares		Par Value
Balance, December 31, 2018	183,081,839		$	1,831		$	1,612,969		$	(852,505	)	$	425		$	762,720
Vesting of restricted stock	—		—			20			—			—			20
Issuance of common stock under the distribution reinvestment plan	1,233,487		12			6,553			—			—			6,565
Distributions to common stockholders	—		—			—			(14,258		)	—			(14,258		)
Repurchase of common stock	(3,670,640	)	(37		)	(19,527		)	—			—			(19,564		)
Other comprehensive loss	—		—			—			—			(286		)	(286		)
Net income	—		—			—			2,148			—			2,148
Balance, March 31, 2019	180,644,686		$	1,806		$	1,600,015		$	(864,615	)	$	139		$	737,345
Vesting of restricted stock	2,250		—			21			—			—			21
Issuance of common stock under the distribution reinvestment plan	419,529		4			2,230			—			—			2,234
Distributions to common stockholders	—		—			—			(14,317		)	—			(14,317		)
Repurchase of common stock	(1,857,825	)	(18		)	(9,885		)	—			—			(9,903		)
Other comprehensive loss	—		—			—			—			(362		)	(362		)
Net loss	—		—			—			(201		)	—			(201		)
Balance, June 30, 2019	179,208,640		$	1,792		$	1,592,381		$	(879,133	)	$	(223	)	$	714,817

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands) 

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	1,947		$	(11,637	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	16,097			36,066
Amortization of deferred financing costs	833			1,224
Amortization of above-market leases	127			154
Amortization of acquired intangible liabilities	(841		)	(604		)
Amortization of operating leases	57			—
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions from continuing operations	3			(218		)
Gain on real estate dispositions from discontinued operations	—			(29,244		)
Impairment loss on real estate	—			5,831
Provision for credit losses	451			18,395
Provision for loan losses	—			2,179
Loss on debt extinguishment	—			207
Straight-line rent	(8,265		)	13,941
Stock-based compensation	41			45
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and other liabilities	1,555			(9,822		)
Accounts payable due to affiliates	(56		)	(717		)
Other assets	1,604			(12,899		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	13,553			12,901
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from real estate disposals of continuing and discontinued operations	958			226,410
Capital expenditures	(1,543		)	(3,683		)
Capital distributions from unconsolidated partnership	—			962
Notes receivable, net	—			(7,200		)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(585		)	216,489
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on notes payable	(18,570		)	(99,132		)
Proceeds from credit facility	41,000			285,000
Payments on credit facility	—			(75,000		)
Proceeds from debt extinguishment	—			338
Payments of deferred financing costs	(826		)	(1,942		)
Repurchase of common stock	(29,467		)	(64,212		)
Other offering costs	—			(4		)
Distributions to stockholders	(20,036		)	(582,432		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—			(4,233		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(27,899		)	(541,617		)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	(14,931		)	(312,227		)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - Beginning of period	43,301			351,914
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - End of period	$	28,370		$	39,687
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
Interest paid, net of interest capitalized of $6 and $217, respectively	$	5,166		$	6,487
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions:
Common stock issued through distribution reinvestment plan	$	8,799		$	25,290
Accrued capital expenditures	$	708		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

June 30, 2019

Note 1—Organization and Business Operations

Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., or the Company, a Maryland corporation, was incorporated on December 16, 2009, and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust, or a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for federal income tax purposes. The Company was organized to acquire and operate a diversified portfolio of income-producing commercial real estate, with a focus on the data center and healthcare property sectors, net leased to creditworthy tenants, as well as to make other real estate-related investments that relate to such property types. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company's board of directors made a determination to sell the Company's data center assets. This decision represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company's results and operations and assets and liabilities for the years presented. As a result, the Company classified the assets in its data centers segment as discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company completed the disposition of all its data center properties. As a result, the Company no longer has a data centers segment, and, therefore, operates in one reportable healthcare segment.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company owned 30 real estate investments, consisting of 60 properties. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, or the Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, and Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC, or the Advisor, the Company’s affiliated advisor, is the special limited partner of the Operating Partnership.

On April 11, 2019, the Company, along with Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II Inc., or REIT II, the Operating Partnership, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, the operating partnership of REIT II, or the REIT II Operating Partnership, and Lightning Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of REIT II, or Merger Sub, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the Merger Agreement.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, including obtaining the requisite Company stockholder vote on the REIT Merger, the Company will merge with and into Merger Sub, or the REIT Merger, with Merger Sub surviving the REIT Merger, or the Surviving Entity, such that following the REIT Merger, the Surviving Entity will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of REIT II. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the separate existence of the Company shall cease.

At the effective time of the REIT Merger and subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, each issued and outstanding share of the Company’s common stock (or a fraction thereof), $0.01 par value per share, or the REIT I Common Stock, will be converted into the right to receive:

(i) $1.00 in cash; and

(ii) 0.4681 shares of REIT II Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, or the REIT II Class A Common Stock.

In addition, each share of REIT I Common Stock, if any, then held by any wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company or by REIT II or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries will no longer be outstanding and will automatically be retired and cease to exist, and no consideration shall be paid, nor any other payment or right inure or be made with respect to such shares of REIT I Common Stock in connection with or as a consequence of the REIT Merger.

The combined company after the REIT Merger, or the Combined Company, will retain the name “Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.” See Note 14—"Commitments and Contingencies" and Note 15—"Subsequent Events" for additional information.

Except as the context otherwise requires, the “Company” refers to Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., the Operating Partnership and all wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. Such condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto are the representation of management. These accounting policies conform to United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of a normal and recurring nature considered for a fair

7

presentation, have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2019.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2018, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and related notes thereto set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2019.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are made and evaluated on an ongoing basis using information that is currently available as well as various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of restricted cash held in escrow and restricted bank deposits. Restricted cash held in escrow includes cash held by lenders in escrow accounts for tenant and capital improvements, repairs and maintenance and other lender reserves for certain properties, in accordance with the respective lender’s loan agreement. Restricted cash held in escrow is reported in other assets, net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Restricted bank deposits consist of tenant receipts for certain properties which are required to be deposited into lender-controlled accounts in accordance with the respective lender's loan agreement. Restricted bank deposits are reported in other assets, net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. See Note 7—"Other Assets, Net."

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning of period and end of period cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the condensed consolidated balance sheets to the totals shown in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (amounts in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
Beginning of period:	2019		2018
Cash and cash equivalents	$	43,133	$	336,500
Restricted cash	168		15,414		(1)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	43,301	$	351,914
End of period:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	28,202	$	37,787
Restricted cash	168		1,900		(1)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	28,370	$	39,687

(1) Amount is attributable to continuing and discontinued operations.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of its real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by estimating whether the Company will recover the carrying value of the assets through its undiscounted future cash flows and their eventual disposition. If, based on this analysis, the Company does not believe that it will be able to recover the carrying value of the assets, the Company will record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets.

8

When developing estimates of expected future cash flows, the Company makes certain assumptions regarding future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease arrangements, property operating expenses, terminal capitalization and discount rates, the expected number of months it takes to re-lease the property, required tenant improvements and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of alternative assumptions in the future cash flow analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s future cash flows and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an impairment, the extent of such loss, as well as the carrying value of the real estate and related assets.

In addition, the Company applies a market approach using comparable sales for certain properties. The use of alternative assumptions in the market approach analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s estimated fair value and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the real estate and related assets.

Impairment of Real Estate

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, no impairment losses were recorded on real estate. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, real estate assets related to one healthcare property with an aggregate carrying amount of $47,375,000 were determined to be impaired, using Level 2 inputs of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value of the property was reduced to its estimated fair value of $41,544,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $5,831,000, which is included in impairment loss on real estate in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Impairment of Acquired Intangible Assets and Acquired Intangible Liabilities

During the three months ended June 30, 2019,no impairment losses were recorded on acquired intangible assets or acquired intangible liabilities. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized an impairment of one in-place lease intangible asset in the amount of approximately $1,469,000 and an impairment of one below-market lease intangible liability in the amount of approximately $407,000, related to a tenant of the Company experiencing financial difficulties, by accelerating the amortization of the intangible asset and intangible liability.

During the three months ended June 30, 2018, no impairment losses were recorded on acquired intangible assets or intangible liabilities. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recognized an impairment of one in-place lease intangible asset in the amount of approximately $21,296,000 related to a former tenant of the Company, by accelerating the amortization of the intangible asset.

Revenue Recognition, Tenant Receivables and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company recognizes non-rental related revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC 606. The Company has identified its revenue streams as rental income from leasing arrangements and tenant reimbursements, which are outside the scope of ASC 606. The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Non-rental revenue, subject to ASC 606, is immaterial to the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

The majority of the Company's revenue is derived from rental revenue, which is accounted for in accordance with ASC 842, Leases, or ASC 842. In accordance with ASC 842, minimum rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease (including rent holidays). For lease arrangements when it is not probable that the Company will collect all or substantially all of the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease, rental revenue is limited to the lesser of the rental revenue that would be recognized on a straight-line basis or the lease payments that have been collected from the lessee. Differences between rental revenue recognized and amounts contractually due under the lease agreements are credited or charged to straight-line rent receivable or straight-line rent liability, as applicable. Tenant reimbursements, which are comprised of additional amounts recoverable from tenants for common area maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable expenses, are recognized when the services are provided and the performance obligations are satisfied.

Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, tenant receivables and straight-line rent receivables were carried net of the provision for credit losses. The provision for credit losses was established for estimated losses resulting from the inability of certain tenants to meet the contractual obligations under their lease agreements. The Company’s determination of the adequacy of these provisions was based primarily upon evaluations of historical loss experience, the tenant’s financial condition, security deposits, letters of credit, lease guarantees, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. Effective January 1, 2019, upon adoption of ASC 842, the Company is no longer recording a provision for credit losses but is, instead, assessing whether or not it is probable that the Company will collect all or substantially all of the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease. Where it is not probable that the Company will collect all or substantially all of the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease, rental revenue is limited to the lesser of the rental revenue that would be recognized on a straight-line basis or the lease payments that have been collected from the lessee. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded $451,000 and $7,097,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded

9

$1,226,000 and $36,023,000, respectively, in bad debt expenses as a reduction in rental revenue in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Notes Receivable

Notes receivable are reported at their outstanding principal balance, net of any unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs and allowances for loan losses. The unamortized deferred fees and costs are amortized over the life of the notes receivable, as applicable and recorded in interest and other expense, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

The Company evaluates the collectability of both interest and principal on each note receivable to determine whether it is collectible, primarily through the evaluation of credit quality indicators, such as the tenant's financial condition, collateral, evaluations of historical loss experience, current economic conditions and other relevant factors, including contractual terms of repayments. Evaluating a note receivable for potential impairment requires management to exercise judgment. The use of alternative assumptions in evaluating a note receivable could result in a different determination of the note's estimated fair value and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the note receivable.

As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the aggregate balance of the Company's note receivable was $2,700,000. The principal balance of the Company's note receivable is secured by its collateral.

For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded $0 and $989,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded $0 and $2,179,000, respectively, in provision for loan losses in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Leases

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had cash on deposit, including restricted cash, in certain financial institutions that had deposits in excess of current federally insured levels. The Company limits its cash investments to financial institutions with high credit standings; therefore, the Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash deposits. To date, the Company has experienced no loss of or lack of access to cash in its accounts.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company owned real estate investments in 32 metropolitan statistical areas, or MSAs, two of which accounted for 10.0% or more of total rental revenue. Real estate investments located in the Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas MSA and the San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas MSA accounted for an aggregate of 18.0% and 12.7%, respectively, of total rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2019.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had three exposures to tenant concentration that accounted for 10.0% or more of total rental revenue. The leases with Post Acute Medical, LLC, Board of Regents of the University of Texas System and 21st Century Oncology, Inc. accounted for 17.8%, 17.3% and 10.8%, respectively, of total rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2019.

Share Repurchase Program

The Company’s share repurchase program allows for repurchases of shares of the Company’s common stock when certain criteria are met. The share repurchase program provides that all repurchases are limited to those that can be funded with equivalent reinvestments pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, during the prior calendar year and other operating funds, as the Company's board of directors may authorize for this purpose.

Repurchases of shares of the Company’s common stock are at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors, provided, however, that the Company will limit the number of shares repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31 of the previous calendar year. In addition, the Company will further limit the amount of shares repurchased each quarter, subject to adjustments in accordance with the 5.0% annual share limitation. The Company’s board of directors, in its sole discretion, may suspend (in whole or in part) the share repurchase program at any time, and may amend, reduce, terminate or otherwise change the share repurchase program upon 30 days' prior notice to the Company’s stockholders for any reason it deems appropriate.

In connection with entering into the Merger Agreement, on April 10, 2019, the Company's board of directors approved the Third Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program, or the Third Amended & Restated SRP, which became effective on May 11, 2019, and was applied beginning with repurchases made on the 2019 third quarter Repurchase Date (as defined in the Third Amended & Restated SRP). Under the Third Amended & Restated SRP, the Company only repurchases shares of common stock in connection with the death, qualifying disability or involuntary exigent circumstance (as determined by the Company's board of directors, in its sole discretion) of a stockholder, subject to certain terms and conditions specified in the Third Amended & Restated SRP. Further, under the Third Amended & Restated SRP, if the Company does not repurchase all of

10

the shares for which repurchase requests were submitted in any quarter, outstanding repurchase requests will not automatically roll over to the subsequent quarter.

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company repurchased approximately 5,528,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $29,467,000 (an average of $5.33 per share). During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company repurchased approximately 9,309,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $64,212,000 (an average of $6.90 per share).

Distribution Policy and Distributions Payable

In order to maintain its status as a REIT, the Company is required to make distributions each taxable year equal to at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding capital gains. To the extent funds are available, the Company intends to continue to pay regular distributions to stockholders. Distributions are paid to stockholders of record as of the applicable record dates. Distributions are payable to stockholders from legally available funds therefor.

In connection with the REIT Merger, on April 10, 2019, the Company's board of directors approved the suspension of the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP, with respect to certain distributions that accrued starting in April 2019. Therefore, starting with the April 2019 distributions, which were paid on the first business day of May 2019, all distributions are paid in cash to all stockholders.

Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average shares of its common stock outstanding for that period. Diluted earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding and all potentially dilutive securities. Shares of non-vested restricted common stock give rise to potentially dilutive shares of common stock. For the three months ended June 30, 2019, diluted earnings per share was computed the same as basic earnings per share because the Company recorded a loss from continuing operations, which would make potentially dilutive shares related to non-vested shares of restricted common stock, antidilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, diluted earnings per share reflected the effect of approximately 22,000 of non-vested shares of restricted common stock that were outstanding as of such period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, diluted earnings per share was computed the same as basic earnings per share because the Company recorded a loss from continuing operations, which would make potentially dilutive shares related to non-vested shares of restricted common stock, antidilutive.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

As required by ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815, the Company records all derivative instruments as assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the income or loss is recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income during the current period.

The Company is exposed to variability in expected future cash flows that are attributable to interest rate changes in the normal course of business. The Company’s primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts is to add stability to future cash flows by managing its exposure to interest rate movements. The Company utilizes derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to effectively convert some of its variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

In accordance with ASC 815, the Company designates interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges of floating-rate borrowings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. See additional discussion in Note 12—"Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities."

The Company reflects all derivative instruments at fair value as either assets or liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with the fair value measurement guidance Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement, the Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

11

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Leases

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB established ASC 842, by issuing ASU 2016-02, Leases, which replaces the guidance previously outlined in ASC 840, Leases. The new standard increases transparency by requiring the recognition by lessees of right-of-use, or ROU, assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months, regardless of lease classification. Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.

The Company adopted ASC 842effective January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Consequently, financial information is not be updated, and the disclosures required under the new standard are not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. Further, the Company is amortizing the ROU assets and operating lease liabilities over the remaining lease term and is presenting the amortization of ROU assets - operating leases and accretion of operating lease liabilities as a single line item within operating activities in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2019.

The Company elected the package of practical expedients, which permits it to not reassess (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (2) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (3) any initial direct costs for any existing leases as of the effective date. The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient, which permits entities to use hindsight in determining the lease term and assessing impairment.

Lessor

As a lessor, the Company's recognition of rental revenue remained largely unchanged, apart from the narrower definition of initial direct costs that can be capitalized. Effective January 1, 2019, indirect leasing costs, such as legal costs related to lease negotiations no longer meet the definition of capitalized initial direct costs under ASU 2016-02 and are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income, and are no longer capitalized.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, to simplify the guidance, that allows lessors to combine non-lease components with the related lease components if both the timing and pattern of transfer are the same for the non-lease component and related lease component, and the lease component would be classified as an operating lease. The single combined component is accounted for under ASC 842 if the lease component is the predominant component, and is accounted for under ASC 606, if the non-lease components are the predominant components. Lessors are permitted to apply the practical expedient to all existing leases on a retrospective or prospective basis. The Company elected the practical expedient to combine its lease and non-lease components that meet the defined criteria and is accounting for the combined lease components under ASC 842. As a result, the Company is no longer presenting rental revenue and tenant reimbursements related to common area maintenance and other expense recoveries separately in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, that allows lessors to make an accounting policy election not to evaluate whether real estate taxes and other similar taxes imposed by a governmental authority on a specific lease revenue-producing transaction are the primary obligation of the lessor as owner of the underlying leased asset. A lessor that makes this election excludes these taxes from the measurement of lease revenue and the associated expense. ASU 2018-20 also requires lessors to (1) exclude lessor costs paid directly by lessees to third parties on the lessor’s behalf from variable payments and, therefore, variable lease revenue and (2) include lessor costs that are paid by the lessor and reimbursed by the lessee in the measurement of variable lease revenue and the associated expense. The Company adopted ASU 2018-20 effective January 1, 2019. The adoption of this standard resulted in a decrease of approximately $142,000 and $284,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, in rental revenue and rental expense, as the aforementioned real estate tax payments are paid by a lessee directly to a third party, and, therefore, are no longer presented on a gross basis in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company's net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders.

Lessee

The Company is a lessee on six ground leases, for which one does not have a corresponding operating lease liability because the Company did not have future payment obligations at the acquisition of the lease. The Company recognized a ROU asset and operating lease liability on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02. See Note 6 —"Leases" for further discussion.

12

Derivatives and Hedging

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, or ASU 2017-12. The objectives of ASU 2017-12 are to (i) improve the transparency and understandability of information conveyed to financial statement users about an entity’s risk management activities by better aligning the entity’s financial reporting for hedging relationships with those risk management activities and (ii) reduce the complexity of and simplify the application of hedge accounting by preparers. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2019. The adoption of ASU 2017-12 did not have an impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes, or ASU 2018-16. ASU 2018-16 permits the use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a United States benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815. ASU 2018-16 was effective upon the adoption of ASU 2017-12. The Company adopted ASU 2018-16 on January 1, 2019, and its provisions did not have an impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements; however, the provisions may impact existing agreements, new contracts and transactions not yet contemplated in the future.

Disclosure Update and Simplification

In August 2018, the SEC issued a final rule, SEC Final Rule Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, that amends the interim financial statement requirements to require a reconciliation of changes in stockholders' equity in the notes or as a separate statement. This analysis should reconcile the beginning balance to the ending balance of each caption in stockholders' equity for each period for which an income statement is required to be filed and comply with the remaining content requirements of Rule 3-04 of Regulation S-X. Registrants will have to provide the reconciliation for both the year-to-date and quarterly periods and comparable periods in Form 10-Q but only for the year-to-date periods in registration statements. The final rule became effective on November 5, 2018. As a result, the Company applied these changes in the presentation of the Company's condensed consolidated statements of stockholders' equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Fair Value Measurement

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, or ASU 2018-13. ASU 2018-13 removes certain disclosure requirements, including the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between the levels and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 also adds certain disclosure requirements, including the requirement to disclose the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate ASU 2018-13 to have a material impact to the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation, primarily related to the recently adopted accounting pronouncements discussed within this note. Amounts previously disclosed as rental revenue, provision for doubtful accounts related to rental revenue, tenant reimbursements revenue and provision for doubtful accounts related to tenant reimbursements during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, are now included in rental revenue and will no longer be presented separately on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

13

Note 3—Dispositions

The Company sold one healthcare property, or the 2019 Disposition, during the six months ended June 30, 2019, for an aggregate sale price of $1,050,000 and generated net proceeds of $958,000. The Company recognized an aggregate loss on sale of $3,000, in loss (gain) on real estate dispositions on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019.

The Company sold six properties (four data center properties and two healthcare properties), or the 2018 Dispositions, during the six months ended June 30, 2018, for an aggregate sale price of $230,665,000 and generated net proceeds of $226,410,000. The Company recognized an aggregate gain on sale of $10,666,000 and $29,244,000, respectively, related to the data center properties sold, in income from discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. The Company recognized an aggregate gain on sale of $218,000, related to the two healthcare properties sold, in loss (gain) on real estate dispositions on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

2019 Disposition

Disposition - Continuing Operations

The following table summarizes the 2019 Disposition that qualifies as continuing operations. The operations related to this asset have been included in continuing operations on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Property Description	Disposition Date	Ownership Percentage		Sale Price (amounts in thousands)		Net Proceeds (amounts in thousands)
21st Century Oncology-Bradenton	05/16/2019	100	%	$	1,050	$	958

2018 Dispositions

Dispositions - Discontinued Operations

Dispositions that represent a strategic shift that have a major effect on results and operations qualify as discontinued operations. The following table summarizes the 2018 Dispositions that qualify as discontinued operations. The operations related to these assets have been included in discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Property Description	Disposition Date	Ownership Percentage	Sale Price (amounts in thousands)		Net Proceeds (amounts in thousands)
Arizona Data Center Portfolio (1)	01/10/2018	100%	$	142,500	$	140,176
Milwaukee Data Center	06/11/2018	100%	21,000		20,397
Alpharetta Data Center II	06/15/2018	100%	64,000		62,858
Total			$	227,500	$	223,431

(1) The Arizona Data Center Portfolio was sold as a two-property portfolio consisting of the Phoenix Data Center and the Scottsdale Data Center.

Dispositions - Continuing Operations

The following table summarizes the 2018 Dispositions that qualify as continuing operations. The operations related to these assets have been included in continuing operations on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Property Description	Disposition Date	Ownership Percentage		Sale Price (amounts in thousands)		Net Proceeds (amounts in thousands)
21st Century Oncology-Tamarac	05/25/2018	100	%	$	1,575	$	1,431
21st Century Oncology-East Naples	05/30/2018	100	%	1,590		1,548
Total				$	3,165	$	2,979

14

Note 4—Acquired Intangible Assets, Net

Acquired intangible assets, net, consisted of the following as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands, except weighted average life amounts):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $24,082 and $22,679, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 13.2 years and 13.6 years, respectively)	$	52,663		$	56,501
Above-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $1,206 and $1,079, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 7.9 years and 8.5 years, respectively)	2,012			2,139
Ground leasehold assets, net of accumulated amortization of $0 and $64, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 0.0 years and 86.6 years, respectively)	—		(1)	$	1,041
	$	54,675		$	59,681

(1) On January 1, 2019, as part of the adoption of ASC 842, as discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements", the Company reclassified the ground leasehold assets balance from acquired intangible assets, net, to right-of-use assets - operating leases within the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The aggregate weighted average remaining life of the acquired intangible assets was 13.0 years and 14.6 years as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Amortization of the acquired intangible assets was $1,232,000 and $1,293,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortization of the acquired intangible assets was $3,965,000 and $24,153,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Of the $3,965,000 recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2019, $1,469,000 was attributable to accelerated amortization due to the impairment of an in-place lease intangible asset related to a tenant experiencing financial difficulties. Of the $24,153,000 recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2018, $21,296,000 related to accelerated amortization due to the impairment of an in-place lease intangible asset related to a former tenant experiencing financial difficulties. Amortization of the in-place leases is included in depreciation and amortization of the above-market leases is recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Note 5—Acquired Intangible Liabilities, Net

Acquired intangible liabilities, net, consisted of the following as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands, except weighted average life amounts):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $5,330 and $5,163, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 15.9 years and 16.2 years, respectively)	$	10,920		$	11,761
Ground leasehold liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $0 and $549, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 0 years and 40.2 years, respectively)	—		(1)	4,776
	$	10,920		$	16,537

(1) On January 1, 2019, as part of the adoption of ASC 842, as discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements," the Company reclassified ground lease liabilities from acquired intangible liabilities, net to right-of-use assets - operating leases within the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The aggregate weighted average remaining life of the acquired intangible liabilities was 15.9 years and 22.9 years as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Amortization of the below-market leases was $212,000 and $254,000, for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortization of the below-market leases was $841,000 and $509,000, for the six months ended June 30,

15

2019 and 2018, respectively. Of the $841,000 recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2019, $407,000 was related to accelerated amortization due to the impairment of a below-market lease intangible liability related to a tenant experiencing financial difficulties. Amortization of below-market leases is recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Note 6—Leases

Lessor

Rental Revenue

The Company’s real estate properties are leased to tenants under operating leases with varying terms. Typically, the leases have provisions to extend the terms of the lease agreements. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate properties leased to tenants.

Future minimum rent to be received from the Company's investments in real estate assets under the terms of non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of June 30, 2019, excluding optional renewal periods for the six months ending December 31, 2019 and for each of the next four years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year	Amount (1)
Six months ending December 31, 2019	$	35,268
2020	74,441
2021	77,579
2022	80,182
2023	81,623
Thereafter	705,434
	$	1,054,527

(1) The table above includes the total future minimum rent in the amount of $53,892,000 to be collected from a new tenant through December 31, 2039, with a lease effective date July 1, 2019.

16

Lessee

Rental Expense

The Company has six ground lease obligations, for which one does not have corresponding operating lease liability because the Company did not have future payment obligations at the acquisition of the lease. The ground lease obligations generally require fixed annual rental payments and may also include escalation clauses. The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company's operating leases was 40.5 years and 40.6 years as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The Company's ground leases do not provide an implicit interest rate. In order to calculate the present value of the remaining ground lease payments, the Company used incremental borrowing rates as of January 1, 2019, adjusted for a number of factors, including the long-term nature of the ground leases, the Company's estimated borrowing costs, and the estimated fair value of the underlying land. The weighted average adjusted incremental borrowing rates ranged between 5.0% and 5.5% as of January 1, 2019.

The future minimum rent payments, discounted by the Company's adjusted incremental borrowing rates, under non-cancelable ground leases for the six months ending December 31, 2019, and for each of the next four years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year	Amount
Six months ending December 31, 2019	$	548
2020	1,097
2021	1,097
2022	1,098
2023	1,101
Thereafter	47,731
Total undiscounted rental payments	52,672
Less imputed interest	(32,864		)
Total operating lease liabilities	$	19,808

Due to the adoption of ASC 842, the Company reclassified ground leasehold assets and ground leasehold liabilities as of January 1, 2019, from acquired intangible assets, net, and acquired intangible liabilities, net, respectively, to right-of-use assets - operating leases within the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

As discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies", the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, effective January 1, 2019, and consequently, financial information was not updated, and the disclosures required under the new lease standard are not provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019.

The following represents approximate future minimum rent payments under non-cancelable ground leases by year as of December 31, 2018, and for each of the next four years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year	Amount
2019	$	698
2020	698
2021	698
2022	698
2023	701
Thereafter	33,550
Total undiscounted rental payments	$	37,043

17

Note 7—Other Assets, Net

Other assets, net, consisted of the following as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Deferred financing costs, related to the revolver portion of the unsecured credit facility, net of accumulated amortization of $10,316 and $9,493, respectively	$	954	$	951
Lease commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $437 and $223, respectively	6,222		6,089
Tenant receivables	661		2,039
Notes receivable	2,700		2,700
Straight-line rent receivable	34,185		26,947
Restricted cash	168		168
Derivative assets	—		426
Prepaid and other assets	1,015		1,644
	$	45,905	$	40,964

Note 8—Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities

Accounts payable and other liabilities, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	3,965	$	2,912
Accrued interest expense	943		890
Accrued property taxes	1,482		4,502
Accrued litigation settlement	3,800		—
Distributions payable to stockholders	4,714		4,974
Tenant deposits	624		624
Deferred rental income	2,231		2,801
Derivative liabilities	223		—
	$	17,982	$	16,703

18

Note 9—Notes Payable and Unsecured Credit Facility

The Company's debt outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Notes payable:
Variable rate notes payable fixed through interest rate swaps	$	17,719		$	17,923
Variable rate notes payable	—			18,366
Total notes payable, principal amount outstanding	17,719			36,289
Unamortized deferred financing costs related to notes payable	(65		)	(75		)
Total notes payable, net of deferred financing costs	17,654			36,214
Unsecured credit facility:
Variable rate revolving line of credit fixed through interest rate swaps	—			38,000
Variable rate revolving line of credit	231,000			152,000
Total unsecured credit facility	231,000			190,000
Total debt outstanding	$	248,654		$	226,214

Significant debt activity during the six months ended June 30, 2019, excluding scheduled principal payments, includes:

• On January 25, 2019, the Company repaid its debt in connection with one of the Company's notes payable with an outstanding principal balance of $18,350,000 at the time of maturity.

• On April 9, 2019, the Operating Partnership exercised its right to a 12-month extension of the KeyBank Credit Facility’s May 28, 2019 maturity date. Therefore, the maturity date of the KeyBank Credit Facility is now May 28, 2020.

• On April 11, 2019, the Operating Partnership, the Company, and certain of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries entered into the Consent and Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to modify limitations on the distributions for each calendar quarter in 2019 and the first calendar quarter of 2020 to be limited to a daily distribution rate of $0.000876713 per share of the Company.

• The Company's interest rate swap related to the revolving line of credit in the amount of $38,000,000 matured on May 28, 2019.

• During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company drew $41,000,000 on its unsecured credit facility to pay down one of the Company's notes payable, to fund share repurchases and to pay ordinary cash distributions as a result of suspending the DRIP concurrent with entering into the Merger Agreement.

The principal payments due on the note payable and unsecured credit facility for the six months ending December 31, 2019, and for each of the next three years ending December 31, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year	Amount
Six months ending December 31, 2019	$	212
2020	231,421		(1)
2021	444
2022	16,642
	$	248,719

(1) Of this amount, $231,000,000 relates to the revolving line of credit under the unsecured credit facility. The maturity date on the revolving line of credit under the unsecured credit facility is May 28, 2020.

Note 10—Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements

The Company has no direct employees. Substantially all of the Company's business is managed by the Advisor. The employees of the Advisor and other affiliates provide services to the Company related to property management, asset management, accounting, investor relations, and all other administrative services.

19

Asset Management Fees

The Company pays the Advisor an annual asset management fee of 0.85% of the aggregate asset value, plus costs and expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing asset management services. The fee is payable monthly in an amount equal to 0.07083% of the aggregate asset value as of the last day of the immediately preceding month.

Operating Expense Reimbursement

The Company reimburses the Advisor for all expenses it paid or incurred in connection with the services provided to the Company, subject to certain limitations. Expenses in excess of the operating expenses in the four immediately preceding quarters that exceed the greater of (a) 2% of average invested assets or (b) 25% of net income, subject to certain adjustments, will not be reimbursed unless the independent directors determine such excess expenses are justified. The Company will not reimburse the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which the Advisor receives an acquisition fee or a disposition fee. Operating expenses incurred on the Company's behalf are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Disposition Fees

If the Advisor or its affiliates provides a substantial amount of services, as determined by a majority of the Company’s independent directors, in connection with the sale of one or more assets, a merger with a change of control of the Company or a sale of the Company, the Company will pay the Advisor a disposition fee equal to an amount of up to the lesser of 0.5% of the transaction price or one-half of the fees paid in the aggregate to third party investment bankers for such transaction. In no event will the combined real estate commission paid to the Advisor, its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties exceed 6.0% of the contract sales price. Disposition fees are recorded in gain on real estate dispositions for sales of operating properties and in income from discontinued operations for sales of properties classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Concurrently, with the entry into the Merger Agreement, the Company, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor entered into a termination letter agreement, or the Termination Agreement, effective as of April 11, 2019. Pursuant to the Termination Agreement, the advisory agreement, as amended, will be terminated at the effective time of the REIT Merger, and the Advisor will waive any disposition fee it otherwise would be entitled to pursuant to the advisory agreement related to the REIT Merger. In addition, the Termination Agreement confirms the disposition fee payable to the Advisor in the event the Merger Agreement is terminated and the Company consummates a different transaction that would entitle the Advisor to the disposition fee.

Property Management Fees

In connection with the rental, leasing, operation and management of the Company's properties, the Company pays Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC, or the Property Manager, and its affiliates, aggregate fees equal to 3.0% of monthly gross revenues from single-tenant properties and 4.0% of monthly gross revenues from multi-tenant properties, or property management fees. The Company reimburses the Property Manager and its affiliates for property-level expenses that any of them pay or incur on the Company’s behalf, including certain salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons employed by the Property Manager and its affiliates, except for the salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons who also serve as one of its executive officers. The Property Manager and its affiliates may subcontract the performance of their duties to third parties and pay all or a portion of the property management fee to the third parties with whom they contract for these services. If the Company contracts directly with third parties for such services, it will pay them customary market fees and may pay the Property Manager an oversight fee equal to 1.0% of the gross revenues of the properties managed. In no event will the Company pay the Property Manager or any affiliate both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property. Property management fees are recorded in rental expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Leasing Commission Fees

The Company pays the Property Manager a separate fee for the initial lease-up, leasing-up of newly constructed properties or re-leasing to existing tenants. Leasing commission fees are capitalized in other assets, net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and amortized over the terms of the related leases.

Construction Management Fees

For acting as general contractor and/or construction manager to supervise or coordinate projects or to provide major repairs or rehabilitation on the Company's properties, the Company may pay the Property Manager up to 5.0% of the cost of the projects, repairs and/or rehabilitation, as applicable, or construction management fees. Construction management fees are capitalized in buildings and improvements in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

20

Subordinated Participation in Net Sale Proceeds

After investors have received a return of their net capital contributions and an 8.0% cumulative non-compounded annual return, then the Advisor is entitled to receive 15.0% of the remaining net sale proceeds, or a subordinated participation in net sale proceeds. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had not incurred a subordinated participation in net sale proceeds to the Advisor or its affiliates. Should the REIT Merger close, the applicable stockholder return threshold of the Combined Company will be an 8.0% cumulative, non-compounded annual return.

The following table details amounts incurred for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 in connection with the Company's related parties transactions described above (amounts in thousands):

		Incurred
		Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
Fee	Entity	2019		2018			2019		2018
Asset management fees	Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC and its affiliates	$	2,400	$	2,613	(1)	$	4,804	$	5,266	(1)
Operating expense reimbursement	Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC and its affiliates	729		462		(2)	1,206		892		(2)
Disposition fees	Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC and its affiliates	—		441		(3)	—		1,154		(3)
Property management fees	Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC	470		724		(4)	939		1,475		(4)
Leasing commission fees	Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC	—		—			347		—
Construction management fees	Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC	4		44		(2)	4		111		(2)
Total		$	3,603	$	4,284		$	7,300	$	8,898

(1) Of the amounts incurred, $2,479,000 and $4,944,000 is included in continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

(2) Entire amount is included in continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

(3) Of the amounts incurred, $16,000 is included in continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

(4) Of the amounts incurred, $676,000 and $1,364,000 is included in continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

The following table details amounts payable to affiliates as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 in connection with the Company's related parties transactions described above (amounts in thousands):

		Payable
Fee	Entity	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Asset management fees	Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC and its affiliates	$	800	$	801
Operating expense reimbursement	Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC and its affiliates	119		281
Property management fees	Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC	126		181
Leasing commission fees	Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC	234		60
Construction management fees	Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC	10		6
Total		$	1,289	$	1,329

Note 11—Fair Value

Notes payable – Fixed Rate—The estimated fair value of notes payable – variable rate fixed through interest rate swap agreements (Level 2) was approximately $17,899,000 and $17,465,000 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, as compared to the outstanding principal of $17,719,000 and $17,923,000 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Unsecured credit facility—The outstanding principal balance of the unsecured credit facility – variable was $231,000,000 and $152,000,000, which approximated its fair value, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The fair value

21

of the Company's variable rate unsecured credit facility is estimated based on the interest rates currently offered to the Company by financial institutions. The estimated fair value of the unsecured credit facility – variable rate fixed through interest rate swap agreements (Level 2) was approximately $37,794,000 as of December 31, 2018, as compared to the outstanding principal of$38,000,000as ofDecember 31, 2018.

Notes receivable—The outstanding principal balance of the notes receivable in the amount of $2,700,000 approximated the fair value as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The fair value was measured using significant other observable inputs (Level 2), which requires certain judgments to be made by management.

Derivative instruments— Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimated fair values of financial instruments. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Company could realize, or be liable for, on disposition of the financial instruments. The Company determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swaps fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The credit valuation adjustments associated with these instruments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and the respective counterparty. However, as of June 30, 2019, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions, and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its interest rate swaps. As a result, the Company determined that its interest rate swaps valuation in its entirety is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 12—"Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" for a further discussion of the Company’s derivative instruments.

The following tables show the fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities and assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	June 30, 2019
	Fair Value Hierarchy
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Fair Value
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	223	$	—	$	223
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	223	$	—	$	223
	December 31, 2018
	Fair Value Hierarchy
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Fair Value
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	—	$	426	$	—	$	426
Total assets at fair value	$	—	$	426	$	—	$	426

22

Real estate assets—no impairment losses of real estate were recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. As discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, real estate assets related to one healthcare property with an aggregate carrying amount of $47,375,000 were determined to be impaired, using Level 2 inputs of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value of the property was reduced to its estimated fair value of $41,544,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $5,831,000.

The following tables show the fair value of the Company's real estate assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2018
	Fair Value Hierarchy
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Re-Measured Balance		Total Losses (2)
Real estate assets (1)	$	—	$	42,515	$	—	$	42,515	$	(6,588	)

(1) During the year ended December 31, 2018, real estate assets related to two healthcare properties with an aggregate carrying amount of $49,103,000 were determined to be impaired. The carrying value of the properties were reduced to their estimated fair value of $42,515,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $6,588,000.

(2) Of this amount, $5,831,000 was recorded as an impairment loss on real estate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated, and that qualify, as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of stockholders' equity and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.

On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2017-12. The adoption of ASU 2017-12 did not have an impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. See Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information regarding ASU 2017-12.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest and other expense, net, as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $32,000 will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as an increase to interest and other expense, net.

See Note 11—"Fair Value" for further discussion of the fair value of the Company’s derivative instrument.

The following table summarizes the notional amount and fair value of the Company’s derivative instrument (amounts in thousands):

Derivative Designated as Hedging Instrument

Balance Sheet Location

Effective Date

Maturity Date

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

Outstanding Notional Amount

Fair Value of

Outstanding Notional Amount

Fair Value of

(Liability)

Asset

Interest rate swap

Accounts payable and other liabilities/ Other assets, net

10/11/2017

10/11/2022

$

17,719

$

(223

)

$

55,923

$

426

The Company's interest rate swap related to the revolving line of credit in the amount of $38,000,000 matured on May 28, 2019.

23

The notional amount under the agreements is an indication of the extent of the Company’s involvement in each instrument at the time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks.

Accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on the intended use and designation of the derivative instrument. The Company designated the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges to hedge the variability of the anticipated cash flows on its variable rate unsecured credit facility and notes payable. The change in fair value of the derivative instruments that are designated as hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), or OCI, in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

The table below summarizes the amount of (loss) income recognized on the interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of (Loss) Income Recognized in OCI on Derivatives			Location of Income (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Net (Loss) Income	Amount of Income Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Net (Loss) Income
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
Interest rate swap	$	(273	)	Interest and other expense, net	$	89
Total	$	(273	)		$	89
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Interest rate swaps	$	225		Interest and other expense, net	$	437
Total	$	225			$	437
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
Interest rate swaps	$	(426	)	Interest and other expense, net	$	222
Total	$	(426	)		$	222
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Interest rate swaps	$	836		Interest and other expense, net	$	412
Total	$	836			$	412

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company either defaults or is capable of being declared in default on any of its indebtedness, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Company records credit risk valuation adjustments on its interest rate swaps based on the respective credit quality of the Company and the counterparty. The Company believes it mitigates its credit risk by entering into agreements with creditworthy counterparties. As of June 30, 2019, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position was $233,000, inclusive of accrued interest but excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to the agreement. 

24

Tabular Disclosure Offsetting Derivatives

The Company has elected not to offset derivative positions in its condensed consolidated financial statements. The following table presents the effect on the Company’s financial position had the Company made the election to offset its derivative positions as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands):

Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities
							Gross Amounts Not Offset  in the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet		Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Balance Sheet		Financial  Instruments Collateral		Cash  Collateral		Net Amount
June 30, 2019	$	223	$	—	$	223	$	—	$	—	$	223

Offsetting of Derivative Assets
							Gross Amounts Not Offset  in the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet		Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Balance Sheet		Financial  Instruments Collateral		Cash  Collateral		Net Amount
December 31, 2018	$	426	$	—	$	426	$	—	$	—	$	426

The Company reports derivative assets as other assets, net, and derivative liabilities as accounts payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Note 13—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents a rollforward of amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	Unrealized Loss on Derivative Instruments			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance as of December 31, 2018	$	905		$	425
Other comprehensive loss before reclassification	(426		)	(426		)
Amount of income reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income	(222		)	(222		)
Other comprehensive loss	(648		)	(648		)
Balance as of June 30, 2019	$	257		$	(223	)

	Unrealized Income on Derivative Instruments			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Balance as of December 31, 2017	$	887		$	407
Other comprehensive income before reclassification	836			836
Amount of income reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net loss	(412		)	(412		)
Other comprehensive income	424			424
Balance as of June 30, 2018	$	1,311		$	831

25

The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) to Net (Loss) Income						Affected Line Items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018
Interest rate swap contracts	$	(222	)	$	(412	)	Interest and other expense, net

Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is, and may become, subject to litigation or claims. As of June 30, 2019, there were no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party.

The Company is party to legal proceedings regarding an alleged right of first refusal with respect to a data center property, which the Company sold to a third party in December 2017. In order to limit the Company’s liability with regard to legal and other possible expenses related to the matter, on August 12, 2019, the parties to the legal proceedings executed a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement provides for a payment of $3,800,000, which the Company agreed to pay no later than August 15, 2019. The Company made the payment on August 13, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, the Company recorded $3,800,000 in accounts payable and other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet and in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income to reflect the settlement of the aforementioned transaction.

Merger Agreement

On April 11, 2019, the Company announced it had entered into the Merger Agreement with REIT II. In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated in connection with the Company’s acceptance of a Superior Proposal or making an Adverse Recommendation Change, as defined in the Merger Agreement, the Company must pay to REIT II a termination fee of $28,800,000.

Note 15—Subsequent Events

Distributions Paid to Stockholders

On July 1, 2019, the Company paid aggregate distributions of $4,714,000, all of which were paid cash, related to distributions declared for each day in the period from June 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019.

On August 1, 2019, the Company paid aggregate distributions of $4,867,000, all of which were paid in cash, related to distributions declared for each day in the period from July 1, 2019 through July 31, 2019.

Distributions Authorized

On July 25, 2019, the board of directors of the Company approved and authorized a daily distribution to the Company’s stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on August 1, 2019 and ending on August 31, 2019. The distributions will be calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and will be equal to $0.000876712 per share of common stock, which will be equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.0%, based on the estimated per share NAV of $5.33. The distributions declared for the record date in August 2019 will be paid in September 2019. The distributions will be payable to stockholders from legally available funds therefor.

Registration Statement on Form S-4

In connection with the REIT Merger, REIT II filed an amended registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-232275), declared effective by the SEC on July 16, 2019, that includes a proxy statement of the Company and that also constitutes a prospectus of REIT II. The REIT Merger is currently anticipated to close in the second half of 2019.

26

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The following discussion should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on March 22, 2019, or the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The terms “we,” “our,” "us," and the “Company” refer to Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, or our Operating Partnership, and all wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than historical facts, include forward-looking statements that reflect our expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” or other similar words. Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s view only as of the date this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is filed with the SEC. We make no representation or warranty (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we do not undertake to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of some, although not all, of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We evaluate these estimates on a regular basis. These estimates are based on management’s historical industry experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Certain statements regarding future estimates and expectations may not be applicable to the extent the REIT Merger is completed.

Overview

We were formed on December 16, 2009, under the laws of Maryland to acquire and operate a diversified portfolio of income-producing commercial real estate with a focus on data centers and healthcare properties, preferably with long-term net leases to creditworthy tenants, as well as to make real estate-related investments that relate to such property types.

We ceased offering shares of our common stock in our initial public offering of up to $1,746,875,000 of shares of our common stock, or our Offering, on June 6, 2014. At the completion of our Offering, we had raised gross proceeds of approximately $1,716,046,000 (including shares of common stock issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP).

On May 22, 2017, we registered 11,387,512 shares of common stock for a price per share of $9.519, for a proposed maximum offering price of $108,397,727 in shares of common stock under our distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP, pursuant to a new Registration Statement on Form S-3, or the DRIP Offering, and collectively with our Offering, our Offerings.

As of June 30, 2019, we had issued approximately 204,692,000 shares of common stock in our Offerings for gross proceeds of $1,997,379,000, before share repurchases of $198,667,000 and offering costs, selling commissions and dealer manager fees of $174,852,000.

On September 27, 2018, our board of directors, at the recommendation of our audit committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, established an estimated net asset value, or the NAV, per share of our common stock, or the Estimated Per Share NAV, calculated as of June 30, 2018, of $5.33. Accordingly, commencing with distributions that accrued for the month of October 2018, shares of common stock were offered pursuant to the DRIP Offering at $5.33 per share. The Estimated

27

Per Share NAV was calculated for purposes of assisting broker-dealers that participated in our Offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations under NASD Rule 2340. The Estimated Per Share NAV was determined by our board of directors after consultation with Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC, or our Advisor, and an independent third-party valuation firm.

Substantially all of our operations are conducted through our Operating Partnership. We are externally advised by our Advisor, which is our affiliate, pursuant to an advisory agreement by and among us, our Operating Partnership and our Advisor. Our Advisor supervises and manages our day-to-day operations and selects the properties and real estate-related investments we acquire and sell, subject to the oversight and approval of our board of directors. Our Advisor also provides marketing, sales and client services related to real estate on our behalf. Our Advisor engages affiliated entities to provide various services to us. Our Advisor is managed by, and is a subsidiary of, our sponsor, Carter/Validus REIT Investment Management Company, LLC, or our Sponsor. We have no paid employees and we rely on our Advisor to provide substantially all of our services.

Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC, or our Property Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Sponsor, serves as our property manager. Our Advisor and our Property Manager received fees during our acquisition stage and will continue to receive fees during our operational stages, and our Advisor may be eligible to receive fees during our liquidation stage.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, our board of directors made a determination to sell our data center assets. This decision represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on our results and operations and assets and liabilities for the periods presented. As a result, we have classified our data centers segment as discontinued operations.

As of December 31, 2018, we had completed the disposition of our data center properties for an aggregate sale price of $1,307.5 million and generated net proceeds of $1,282.1 million. Additionally, as of December 31, 2018, we had sold three healthcare properties for an aggregate sale price of $91.2 million and generated net proceeds of $90.5 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, we sold one healthcare property for an aggregate sale price of approximately$1.1 million and generated net proceeds of approximately $1.0 million.

As of June 30, 2019, we owned 60 healthcare properties, comprised of 63 buildings and approximately 2,573,000 square feet of gross rentable area.

On June 11, 2019, Todd M. Sakow resigned as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, effective immediately. In connection with Mr. Sakow's resignation, the board of directors elected Kay C. Neely to serve as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, effective as of June 11, 2019.

Pending Merger with Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.

On April 11, 2019, we, along with Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., or REIT II, the Operating Partnership, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, the operating partnership of REIT II, or the REIT II Operating Partnership, and Lightning Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of REIT II, or Merger Sub, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the Merger Agreement.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, we will merge with and into Merger Sub, or the REIT Merger, with Merger Sub surviving the REIT Merger, or the Surviving Entity, such that following the REIT Merger, the Surviving Entity will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of REIT II. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the separate existence of the Company shall cease.

At the effective time of the REIT Merger and subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, each issued and outstanding share of our common stock (or a fraction thereof), $0.01 par value per share, or the REIT I Common Stock, will be converted into the right to receive:

(i) $1.00 in cash; and

(ii) 0.4681 shares of REIT II Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, or the REIT II Class A Common Stock.

In addition, each share of REIT I Common Stock, if any, then held by any wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company or by REIT II or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries will no longer be outstanding and will automatically be retired and cease to exist, and no consideration shall be paid, nor any other payment or right inure or be made with respect to such shares of REIT I Common Stock in connection with or as a consequence of the REIT Merger.

The combined company after the REIT Merger, or the Combined Company, will retain the name “Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.” The REIT Merger is intended to qualify as a “reorganization” under, and within the meaning of, Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code.

28

In connection with the REIT Merger, REIT II filed an amended registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-232275), declared effective by the SEC on July 16, 2019, that includes a proxy statement of the Company and that also constitutes a prospectus of REIT II. The REIT Merger is currently anticipated to close in the second half of 2019.

In connection with the REIT Merger, on April 10, 2019, our board of directors approved the suspension of the DRIP commencing with distributions that accrued in April 2019. Therefore, starting with the April 2019 distributions, which were paid on the first business day of May 2019, all distributions are paid in cash to all stockholders.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our critical accounting policies were disclosed in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies as disclosed therein.

Interim Unaudited Financial Data

Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by us in accordance with GAAP in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are, in our view, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim period. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year; such full year results may be less favorable. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Qualification as a REIT

We elected, and qualify, to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and we intend to continue to be taxed as a REIT. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90.0% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders.

If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT in any taxable year, we would then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and would not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our net income (loss) and net cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 2—“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements and —Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted” to our condensed consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Factors That May Influence Results of Operations

We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally, that may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the acquisition, management and operation of our properties, other than those set forth in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Part II, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

29

Results of Operations

Our results of operations are influenced by the operating performance of our operating healthcare real estate properties.

The following table shows the property statistics of our real estate properties as of June 30, 2019 and 2018:

	June 30,
	2019		2018
Number of operating real estate properties	60		61
Leased square feet	2,354,000		2,357,000
Weighted average percentage of rentable square feet leased	92	%	91	%

The following table summarizes our real estate activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Operating properties disposed	1		2		1		2
Net book value of properties disposed	$	970,000	$	2,761,000	$	970,000	$	2,761,000

This section describes and compares our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. We generate almost all of our income from property operations. In order to evaluate our overall portfolio, management analyzes the net operating income of same store properties. We define "same store properties" as operating properties that were owned and operated for the entirety of both calendar periods being compared and excludes properties under development and properties classified as discontinued operations.

By evaluating the revenue and expenses of our same store properties, management is able to monitor the operations of our existing properties for comparable periods to measure the performance of our current portfolio and determine the effects of our dispositions on net income (loss).

Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2018

Changes in our revenues are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		Change
Same store rental revenue	$	19,513	$	16,442	$	3,071
Non-same store rental revenue	—		15		(15		)
Same store tenant reimbursements	858		722		136
Non-same store tenant reimbursements	—		1		(1		)
Other operating income	2		2		—
Total rental revenue	$	20,373	$	17,182	$	3,191

• Same store rental revenue and same store tenant reimbursements, which is a non-GAAP metric, increased primarily due to write-offs of rental revenue and tenant reimbursements in the amount of $6.0 million related to a former tenant who was experiencing financial difficulties during the three months ended June 30, 2018. The former tenant's lease was terminated on August 13, 2018. The property was re-leased to a new tenant on October 22, 2018, from which we recognized $3.5 million and $0.1 million of same store rental revenue and tenant reimbursements, respectively, during the three months ended June 30 2019.

30

Changes in our expenses are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			Change
Same store rental expenses	$	1,939	$	2,921		$	(982	)
Non-same store rental expenses	10		39			(29		)
General and administrative expenses	6,112		1,268			4,844
Asset management fees	2,400		2,479			(79		)
Depreciation and amortization	7,304		7,245			59
Impairment loss on real estate	—		5,831			(5,831		)
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions	3		(218		)	221
Total expenses	$	17,768	$	19,565		$	(1,797	)

• Same store rental expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in real estate taxes as a result of the adoption of ASU 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, as discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," coupled with a decrease in real estate taxes, which were unpaid by a former tenant during the three months ended June 30, 2018, who was experiencing financial difficulties, and assumed by us and whose lease was terminated on August 13, 2018.

• General and administrative expenses increased primarily due to a $3.8 million expense recognized related to a settlement that resulted from legal proceedings, as discussed in Note 14—"Commitments and Contingencies," coupled with an increase of legal, professional and directors' fees incurred in connection with the REIT Merger and due to the completion of a cost segregation study during the three months ended June 30, 2018, designed to reduce the Company's exposure to excise taxes.

• Impairment loss on real estate decreased due to the carrying amount of one real estate property exceeding its fair value by $5.8 million during the three months ended  June 30, 2018. No impairment loss on real estate was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2019.

Changes in other income (expense) are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			Change
Interest and other expense, net:
Interest on notes payable	(214		)	(1,071		)	857
Interest on unsecured credit facility	(2,451		)	(2,354		)	(97		)
Amortization of deferred financing costs	(262		)	(534		)	272
Capitalized interest	6			116			(110		)
Loss on debt extinguishment	—			(207		)	207
Cash deposits interest	115			77			38
Notes receivable interest and other income	—			989			(989		)
Total interest and other expense, net	(2,806		)	(2,984		)	178
Provision for loan losses	—			(989		)	989
Total other expense	(2,806		)	(3,973		)	1,167
Income from discontinued operations	$	—		$	11,950		$	(11,950	)

• Interest on notes payable decreased due to the repayment of three notes payable since April 1, 2018, in the amount of $108.7 million. The outstanding principal balance on notes payable was $17.7 million as of June 30, 2019, as compared to $42.3 million as of June 30, 2018.

• Notes receivable interest and other income, and provision for loan losses decreased due to the Company not recognizing interest income on the note receivable outstanding balance of $2.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to interest income recognized and reserved as provision for loan losses on the notes receivable outstanding balance of $27.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018.

31

• Income from discontinued operations decreased due to the disposition of our data center properties during the year ended December 31 2018.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2018

Changes in our revenues are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			Change
Same store rental revenue	$	39,622	$	19,163		$	20,459
Non-same store rental revenue	—		65			(65		)
Same store tenant reimbursements	1,659		(518		)	2,177
Non-same store tenant reimbursements	2		1			1
Other operating income	6		6			—
Total rental revenue	$	41,289	$	18,717		$	22,572

• Same store rental revenue and same store tenant reimbursements, which is a non-GAAP metric, increased primarily due to a reduction in revenue and the write-off of straight-line rent in the aggregate amount of $33.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, related to a former tenant who was experiencing financial difficulties. The former tenant's lease was terminated on August 13, 2018. The property was re-leased to a new tenant on October 22, 2018, from which we recognized $7.0 million and $0.1 million in same store rental revenue and tenant reimbursements, respectively, during the six months ended June 30 2019.

Changes in our expenses are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			Change
Same store rental expenses	$	3,556	$	5,912		$	(2,356	)
Non-same store rental expenses	2		48			(46		)
General and administrative expenses	9,003		2,877			6,126
Asset management fees	4,804		4,944			(140		)
Depreciation and amortization	16,097		36,066			(19,969		)
Impairment loss on real estate	—		5,831			(5,831		)
Gain on real estate dispositions	3		(218		)	221
Total expenses	$	33,465	$	55,460		$	(21,995	)

• Same store rental expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in real estate taxes as a result of the adoption of ASU 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, as discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," coupled with a decrease in real estate taxes, which were unpaid by a former tenant, who was experiencing financial difficulties during the six months ended June 30, 2018, and assumed by us and whose lease was terminated on August 13, 2018.

• General and administrative expenses increased primarily due to a $3.8 million expense recognized related to a settlement that resulted from legal proceedings, as discussed in Note 14—"Commitments and Contingencies," coupled with an increase in legal, professional and directors' fees incurred in connection with the REIT Merger.

• Depreciation and amortization decreased primarily due to accelerated amortization recorded in the amount of $21.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, related to one in-place lease intangible asset, related to a former tenant who was experiencing financial difficulties and whose lease was terminated on August 13, 2018, as compared to accelerated amortization recorded in the amount of $1.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019, related to one in-place lease intangible asset due to a tenant experiencing financial difficulties.

• Impairment loss on real estate decreased due to the carrying amount of one real estate property exceeding its fair value by $5.8 million during the six months ended  June 30, 2018. No impairment loss on real estate was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

32

Changes in other income (expense) are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			Change
Interest and other expense, net:
Interest on notes payable	$	(519	)	$	(3,011	)	$	2,492
Interest on unsecured credit facility	(4,698		)	(2,894		)	(1,804		)
Amortization of deferred financing costs	(833		)	(1,224		)	391
Capitalized interest	6			217			(211		)
Loss on debt extinguishment	—			(207		)	207
Cash deposits interest	167			196			(29		)
Notes receivable interest and other income	—			1,725			(1,725		)
Total interest and other expense, net	(5,877		)	(5,198		)	(679		)
Provision for loan losses	—			(2,179		)	2,179
Total other expense	(5,877		)	(7,377		)	1,500
Income from discontinued operations	$	—		$	32,483		$	(32,483	)

• Interest on notes payable decreased due to the repayment of four notes payable since January 1, 2018, in the amount of $121.1 million. The outstanding principal balance on notes payable was $17.7 million as of June 30, 2019, as compared to $42.3 million as of June 30, 2018.

• Interest on unsecured credit facility increased due to an increase in the weighted average outstanding principal balance on our unsecured credit facility, coupled with an increase in interest rates.

• Notes receivable interest and other income, and provision for loan losses decreased due to the Company not recognizing interest income on the note receivable outstanding balance of $2.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to interest income recognized and reserved as provision for loan losses on the notes receivable outstanding balance of $27.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

• Provision for loan losses decreased in the amount of $2.2 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded $1.3 million as bad debt expense on accrued interest and $0.9 million recorded as bad debt expense on a personal property tax receivable.

• Income from discontinued operations decreased due to the disposition of our data center properties during the year ended December 31 2018.

Inflation

We are exposed to inflation risk as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are provisions in certain of our leases with tenants that are intended to protect us from, and mitigate the risk of, the impact of inflation. These provisions include scheduled increases in contractual base rent receipts, reimbursement billings for operating expenses, pass-through charges and real estate tax and insurance reimbursements. However, due to the long-term nature of our leases, among other factors, the leases may not reset frequently enough to adequately offset the effects of inflation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal demands for funds are for capital expenditures, operating expenses, distributions to and repurchases from stockholders and principal and interest on any current and future indebtedness. Generally, cash needs for these items are generated from operations of our current investments. The sources of our operating cash flows will be primarily provided by the rental income received from current and future tenants of our leased properties.

We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash flows provided by operations, borrowings on our unsecured credit facility, and secured and unsecured borrowings from banks and other lenders to finance our unencumbered real estate assets.

We are required to payoff $231,000,000 related to the revolving line of credit under the unsecured credit facility on its maturity on May 28, 2020.

33

We are required by the terms of applicable loan documents to meet certain financial covenants, such as coverage ratios and reporting requirements. In addition, certain loan agreements include cross-default provisions to financial covenants in lease agreements with our tenants so that a default in the financial covenant in the lease agreement is a default in our loan. We were in compliance with all financial covenant requirements as of the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report.

Long-term Liquidity and Capital Resources

On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the payments of tenant improvements, operating expenses, distributions to and repurchases from stockholders, and interest and principal payments on current and future indebtedness. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through proceeds from cash flow from operations, borrowings on our unsecured credit facility, proceeds from secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders.

We expect that substantially all cash flows from operations will be used to pay distributions to our stockholders after certain capital expenditures; however, we have used, and may continue to use, other sources to fund distributions, as necessary, such as, funds equal to amounts reinvested in the DRIP Offering (subject to our board of directors' approval), borrowing on our unsecured credit facility and/or future borrowings on unencumbered assets. To the extent cash flows from operations are lower due to lower-than-expected returns on the properties held, our distributions paid to stockholders may be lower. We expect that substantially all net cash flows from our operations or debt financings will be used to fund certain capital expenditures, repayments of outstanding debt or distributions to our stockholders in excess of cash flows from operations.

Capital Expenditures

We will require approximately $7.3 million in expenditures for capital improvements over the next 12 months. We cannot provide assurances, however, that actual expenditures will not exceed these estimated expenditure levels. As of June 30, 2019, we had $0.2 million of restricted cash in escrow reserve accounts for such capital expenditures. In addition, as of June 30, 2019, we had approximately $28.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, we paid capital expenditures of $1.5 million that primarily related to four healthcare real estate investments.

Unsecured Credit Facility

As of June 30, 2019, the maximum commitment available under the unsecured credit facility was $400,000,000, consisting of a revolving line of credit, with a maturity date of May 28, 2020.

On April 11, 2019, our Operating Partnership, the Company, and certain of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries entered into the Consent and Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with KeyBank National Association, a national banking association, or KeyBank, certain other lenders, and KeyBank, as Administrative Agent, which provides for KeyBank’s consent, as Administrative Agent, to the Operating Partnership’s and the Company’s execution and delivery, but not the consummation of, the Merger Agreement. In addition, the Consent and Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement modifies limitations on the distributions for each calendar quarter in 2019 and the first calendar quarter of 2020 to be limited to a daily distribution rate of $0.000876713 per share of common stock of the Company.

Generally, proceeds of the unsecured credit facility are used for tenant improvements, leasing commissions and capital expenditures with respect to real estate, for repayment of indebtedness and for general corporate and working capital purposes.

We were in compliance with all financial covenant requirements under the unsecured credit facility at June 30, 2019.

As of June 30, 2019, we had a total unencumbered pool availability under the unsecured credit facility of $287,300,000 and an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $231,000,000; therefore, $56,300,000 was available to be drawn under the unsecured credit facility.

34

Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2018

	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2019			2018			Change
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	13,553		$	12,901		$	652
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	$	(585	)	$	216,489		$	(217,074	)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(27,899	)	$	(541,617	)	$	513,718

Operating Activities

• Net cash provided by operating activities increased primarily due to uncollectible rent related to a former tenant who was experiencing financial difficulties and whose lease was terminated on October 10, 2018. The property was re-leased to a new tenant, from which we recognized $0.6 million of collectible rent during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

Investing Activities

• Net cash provided by investing activities decreased by $217.1 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, we sold one real estate property and generated proceeds from the real estate disposal of approximately $1.0 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we sold six real estate properties and generated proceeds from the real estate disposals of approximately $226.4 million. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2018, we funded $7.2 million in notes receivable to our tenants.

Financing Activities

• Net cash used in financing activities decreased primarily due to a decrease in distributions to stockholders of $562.4 million related to a special distribution of $556.2 million paid to stockholders during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and a reduction in ordinary distributions from $0.42 per share per annum to $0.32 per share per annum on October 1, 2018, coupled with a decrease in repurchases of common stock of $34.7 million due to implementing and reaching our quarterly share limitation for the first quarter repurchase period of 2019. Net cash used in financing activities also decreased due to a reduction in proceeds from our credit facility of $244.0 million, coupled with fewer principal payments on our notes payable during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

35

Distributions

The amount of distributions payable to our stockholders is determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including our funds available for distribution, financial condition, lenders' restrictions and limitations, capital expenditure requirements and the annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code. To the extent that funds are available, we intend to continue to pay monthly distributions to stockholders. Our board of directors must authorize each distribution and may, in the future, authorize lower amounts of distributions or not authorize additional distributions; and, therefore, distribution payments are not guaranteed. Our Advisor may also defer, suspend and/or waive fees and expense reimbursements if we have not generated sufficient cash flow from our operations and other sources to fund distributions.

We have funded distributions with operating cash flows from our properties, including proceeds from the disposition of certain real estate properties and proceeds from our unsecured credit facility, and funds equal to amounts reinvested in the DRIP. To the extent that we do not have taxable income, distributions paid will be considered a return of capital to stockholders. The following table shows the sources of distributions paid during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019					2018
Distributions paid in cash - common stockholders	$	20,036				$	582,432	(1)
Distributions reinvested (shares issued)	8,799		(4)			25,290
Total distributions	$	28,835				$	607,722
Source of distributions:
Cash flows provided by operations (3)	$	13,553		47	%	$	12,901		2	%
Offering proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to the DRIP (3)	8,799			31	%	25,290			4	%
Cash and cash equivalents - Beginning of period (3)	6,483			22	%	336,500		(2)	55	%
Proceeds from real estate disposals (3)	—			—	%	226,410			38	%
Proceeds from credit facility (3)	—			—	%	6,621			1	%
Total sources	$	28,835		100	%	$	607,722		100	%

(1) Includes a special cash distribution of $556,227,000 paid on March 16, 2018, to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 15, 2018.

(2) Represents the cash available at the beginning of the year primarily attributable to proceeds from the disposition of certain real estate properties in 2017.

(3) Percentages were calculated by dividing the respective source amount by the total sources of distributions.

(4) In connection with the REIT Merger, on April 10, 2019, our board of directors approved the suspension of the DRIP commencing with distributions that accrued in April 2019. Therefore, starting with April 2019 distributions, which were paid on the first business day of May 2019, all distributions are paid in cash to all stockholders.

Total distributions declared but not paid as of June 30, 2019 were $4.7 million for common stockholders. These distributions were paid on July 1, 2019.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, we declared and paid ordinary distributions of approximately $28.8 million to common stockholders, which includes shares issued pursuant to the DRIP Offerings, as compared to FFO (as defined below) for the six months ended June 30, 2019 of $18.0 million. The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.

For a discussion of distributions paid subsequent to June 30, 2019, see Note 15—"Subsequent Events" to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

36

Contractual Obligations

As of June 30, 2019, we had approximately $248,719,000 of principal debt outstanding, of which $17,719,000 related to a note payable and $231,000,000 related to our unsecured credit facility. See Note 9—"Notes Payable and Unsecured Credit Facility" to the condensed consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for certain terms of the debt outstanding.

Our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2019, were as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Payments due by period
	Less than 1 Year			1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
Principal payments — variable rate debt fixed through interest rate swap agreements	421			886		16,412		—		17,719
Interest payments — variable rate debt fixed through interest rate swap agreements (1)	839			1,635		287		—		2,761
Principal payments — variable rate debt	231,000		(3)	—		—		—		231,000
Interest payments — variable rate debt (2)	8,872			—		—		—		8,872
Capital expenditures	7,279			2,433		—		—		9,712
Ground lease payments	1,096			2,195		2,226		47,155		52,672
Total	$	249,507		$	7,149	$	18,925	$	47,155	$	322,736

(1) We used the fixed rate under our interest rate swap agreement as of June 30, 2019, to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.

(2) We used the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus the applicable margin under our variable rate debt agreement as of June 30, 2019, to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.

(3) Amount relates to the revolving line of credit under our unsecured credit facility. The maturity date on the revolving line of credit under our unsecured credit facility is May 28, 2020.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2019, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements

We have entered into agreements with our Advisor and its affiliates, whereby we agree to pay certain fees to, or reimburse certain expenses of our Advisor or its affiliates for disposition fees, asset and property management fees and reimbursement of operating costs. Refer to Note 10—"Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements" to our condensed consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a detailed discussion of the various related-party transactions and agreements.

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

One of our objectives is to provide cash distributions to our stockholders from cash generated by our operations. Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, or FFO, which we believe is an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to our net income as determined under GAAP.

We define FFO, consistent with NAREIT’s definition, as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property and asset impairment write-downs, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis.

We, along with others in the real estate industry, consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a REIT’s operating performance because it is based on a net income analysis of property portfolio performance that excludes non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization and asset impairment write-downs, which we believe provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to our management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy.

37

Historical accounting convention (in accordance with GAAP) for real estate assets requires companies to report their investment in real estate at its carrying value, which consists of capitalizing the cost of acquisitions, development, construction, improvements and significant replacements, less depreciation and amortization and asset impairment write-downs, if any, which is not necessarily equivalent to the fair market value of their investment in real estate assets.

The historical accounting convention requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, which could be the case if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since the fair value of real estate assets historically rises and falls with market conditions including, but not limited to, inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation could be less informative.

In addition, we believe it is appropriate to disregard asset impairment write-downs as they are non-cash adjustments to recognize losses on prospective sales of real estate assets. Since losses from sales of real estate assets are excluded from FFO, we believe it is appropriate that asset impairment write-downs in advancement of realization of losses should be excluded. Impairment write-downs are based on negative market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, which are independent of our operating performance, including, but not limited to, a significant adverse change in the financial condition of our tenants, changes in supply and demand for similar or competing properties, changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning law, which can change over time. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability by estimating whether we will recover the carrying value of the asset through undiscounted future cash flows and eventual disposition (including, but not limited to, net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of property and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP). If based on this analysis, we do not believe that we will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate asset, we will record an impairment write-down to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate asset. Testing for indicators of impairment is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis or when indicators of impairment exist. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that identifying impairments is based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and that we intend to have a relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges through the eventual sale of the property.

In developing estimates of expected future cash flows, we make certain assumptions regarding future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease arrangements, property operating expenses, terminal capitalization and discount rates, the expected number of months it takes to re-lease the property, required tenant improvements and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of alternative assumptions in the future cash flow analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s future cash flows and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an asset impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the real estate asset.

Publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as us, typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operations. While other start-up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that publicly registered, non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after the acquisition activity ceases. Thus, we will not continuously purchase real estate assets and intend to have a limited life. Due to these factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives, or the IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as modified funds from operations, or MFFO, which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT. MFFO is a metric used by management to evaluate sustainable performance and dividend policy. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income as determined under GAAP.

We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s definition in its Practice Guideline: FFO further adjusted for the following items included in the determination of GAAP net income; acquisition fees and expenses; amounts related to straight-line rental income and amortization of above and below intangible lease assets and liabilities; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, adjustments related to contingent purchase price obligations where such adjustments have been included in the derivation of GAAP net income, and after adjustments for a consolidated and unconsolidated partnership and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect

38

MFFO on the same basis. Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline, described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude amortization of above and below-market leases, along with the net of right-of-use assets - operating leases amortization and operating lease liabilities accretion, resulting from above- and below- market ground leases, and amounts related to straight-line rents (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to closer to an expected to be received cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments). The other adjustments included in the IPA’s Practice Guidelines are not applicable to us.

In addition, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flows from operations in accordance with GAAP.

We use MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs, which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence the use of such measures may be useful to investors. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such charges that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to assist management and investors in comparing the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance, as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure. However, MFFO may be useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. MFFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value since impairment write-downs are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining MFFO.

FFO and MFFO, as described above, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operational performance. The method used to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operating performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO. MFFO has not been scrutinized to the level of other similar non-GAAP performance measures by the SEC or any other regulatory body.

39

The following is a reconciliation of net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO and MFFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands, except share data and per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(201	)	$	5,642		$	1,947		$	(11,589	)
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization (1)	7,304			7,245			16,097			36,066
Impairment loss on real estate	—			5,831			—			5,831
Gain on real estate dispositions from discontinued operations	—			(10,666		)	—			(29,244		)
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions from continuing operations	3			(218		)	3			(218		)
FFO attributable to common stockholders	$	7,106		$	7,834		$	18,047		$	846
Adjustments:
Amortization of intangible assets and liabilities (2)	(148		)	(223		)	(714		)	(450		)
Amortization of operating leases	29			—			57			—
Straight-line rent (3)	(4,470		)	(1,175		)	(8,265		)	13,941
Loss on debt extinguishment	—			207			—			207
MFFO attributable to common stockholders	$	2,517		$	6,643		$	9,125		$	14,544
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	179,408,235			181,128,292			180,010,221			183,388,291
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	179,408,235			181,128,292			180,032,622			183,388,291
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted for FFO	179,430,784			181,146,292			180,032,622			183,406,291
Net (loss) income per common share - basic	$	—		$	0.03		$	0.01		$	(0.06	)
Net (loss) income per common share - diluted	$	—		$	0.03		$	0.01		$	(0.06	)
FFO per common share - basic	$	0.04		$	0.04		$	0.10		$	—
FFO per common share - diluted	$	0.04		$	0.04		$	0.10		$	—

(1) During the six months ended June 30, 2019, we wrote off one in-place lease intangible asset in the amount of approximately $1,469,000 by accelerating the amortization of the intangible asset related to a tenant that is experiencing financial difficulties. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we wrote off one in-place lease intangible asset in the amount of approximately $21,296,000 by accelerating the amortization of the intangible asset related to a tenant that was experiencing financial difficulties.

(2) Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed for impairment, However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges related to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, we wrote off one below-market lease intangible liability in the amount of approximately $407,000 by accelerating the amortization of the intangible liability related to one of our tenants experiencing financial difficulties.

(3) Under GAAP, rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related lease (including rent holidays, if applicable). This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than the underlying contract terms. During the six monthsended June 30, 2019, we wrote off approximately $775,000 of straight-line rent related to a tenant that is experiencing financial difficulties. During the six monthsended June 30, 2018, we wrote off approximately $17,628,000 of straight-line rent related to a former tenant that was experiencing financial difficulties. By adjusting for the change in straight-line rent receivable, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms, providing insight on the expected contractual cash flows of such lease terms, and aligns with our analysis of operating performance.

40

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, the primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk.

We have obtained variable rate debt financing to meet our liquidity requirements, and we are exposed to changes in the one-month LIBOR. Our objectives in managing interest rate risk seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on operations and cash flows, and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at interest rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable interest rates to fixed rates.

We have entered into derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a given variable rate financial instrument. We are exposed to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, we owe the counterparty and, therefore, it does not possess credit risk. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. We manage the market risk associated with interest rate contracts by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. We have not entered into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our future investments will be subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of tenants, which may affect our ability to refinance our debt, if necessary.

The following table summarizes our principal debt outstanding as of June 30, 2019 (amounts in thousands):

	June 30, 2019
Notes payable:
Variable rate notes payable fixed through interest rate swaps	$	17,719
Total notes payable	17,719
Unsecured credit facility:
Variable rate revolving line of credit	231,000
Total unsecured credit facility	231,000
Total principal debt outstanding (1)	$	248,719

(1) As of June 30, 2019, the weighted average interest rate on our total debt outstanding was 4.2%.

As of June 30, 2019, $231.0 million of the $248.7 million total principal debt outstanding was subject to variable interest rates with a weighted average interest rate of 4.2% per annum. As of June 30, 2019, an increase of 50 basis points in the market rates of interest would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $1.2 million per year.

As of June 30, 2019, we had one interest rate swap agreement outstanding, which matures on October 11, 2022, with an aggregate notional amount under the swap agreement of $17.7 million and an aggregate settlement value of $(0.2) million. The settlement value of this interest rate swap agreement is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads. As of June 30, 2019, an increase of 50 basis points in the market rate of interest would have resulted in an increase to the settlement value of this interest rate swap to $0.04 million. This interest rate swap was designated as a hedging instrument.

We do not have any foreign operations and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to us, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and we necessarily were required to apply our judgment in evaluating whether the benefits of the controls and procedures that we adopt outweigh their costs.

41

As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, we conducted an evaluation as of June 30, 2019 under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of June 30, 2019, were effective at a reasonable assurance level.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

42

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which our properties are the subject. See Note 14—"Commitments and Contingencies" to the condensed consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the SEC on March 22, 2019, except as noted below.

Distributions paid from sources other than our cash flows from operations may adversely affect our ability to fund future distributions with cash flows from operations and may adversely affect a stockholder's overall return.

To the extent that cash flow from operations has been or is insufficient to fully cover our distributions to our stockholders, we have paid, may continue to pay and have no limits on the amounts we may pay, distributions from sources other than from our cash flows from operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, our cash flows provided by operations of approximately $13.6 million was a shortfall of approximately $15.2 million, or 52.8%, of our ordinary distributions paid (total ordinary distributions were approximately $28.8 million, of which $20.0 million was cash and $8.8 million was reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP) during such period and such shortfall was paid from proceeds from the DRIP, cash at the beginning of the period, proceeds from real estate disposals and proceeds from our credit facility.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, our cash flows provided by operations of approximately $23.6 million was a shortfall of $63.1 million, or 72.8%, of our ordinary distributions paid (total ordinary distributions were approximately $86.7 million, of which $44.9 million was cash and $41.8 million was reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP) during such period and such shortfall was paid from proceeds from the DRIP, our unsecured credit facility and proceeds from real estate dispositions. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2018, we paid a special cash distribution of approximately $556.2 million. The special cash distribution was funded by cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period in the amount of $336.5 million, proceeds from real estate dispositions and proceeds from our credit facility.

If we cannot maintain certain tenant occupancy levels in our properties, we may not generate sufficient cash flows from operations to pay distributions, which may result in a lower return on a stockholder's investment than he or she may expect. We may pay, and have no limits on the amounts we may pay, distributions from any source, such as from borrowings, the sale of assets, the sale of additional securities, advances from our Advisor, our Advisor’s deferral, and suspension and/or waiver of its fees and expense reimbursements. Funding distributions from borrowings could restrict the amount we can borrow for investments, which may affect our profitability. Funding distributions from the sale of assets may affect our ability to generate cash flows. Funding distributions from the sale of additional securities could dilute stockholders' interest in us if we sell shares of our common stock to third party investors. As a result, the return investors may realize on their investment may be reduced and investors who invested in us before we generated significant cash flow may realize a lower rate of return than later investors. Payment of distributions from any of the aforementioned sources could restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, affect our profitability and/or affect the distributions payable upon a liquidity event, any or all of which may have an adverse effect on an investment in us.

A high concentration of our properties in a particular geographic area, or of tenants in a similar industry, would magnify the effects of downturns in that geographic area or industry.

As of June 30, 2019, we owned 30 real estate investments, located in 32 metropolitan statistical areas, or MSAs, two of which accounted for 10.0% or more of our total rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2019. Real estate investments located in the Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas MSA and the San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas MSA accounted for 18.0% and 12.7%, respectively, of our total rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2019. There is a geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in each MSA’s economy. Geographic concentration of our properties exposes us to economic downturns in the areas where our properties are located. A regional or local recession in any of these areas could adversely affect our ability to generate or increase operating revenues, attract new tenants or dispose of unproductive properties. Similarly, since the tenants of our properties are in the healthcare industry, any adverse effect to the healthcare industry generally would have a disproportionately adverse effect on our portfolio. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, 100.0% of our total rental revenue was derived from healthcare properties.

As of June 30, 2019, we had three exposures to tenant concentration that accounted for 10.0% or more of total rental revenue. The leases with Post Acute Medical, LLC, Board of Regents of the University of Texas System and 21st Century Oncology, Inc. accounted for 17.8%, 17.3% and 10.8%, respectively, of total rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2019.

43

Our investments in properties where the underlying tenant has a below investment grade credit rating, as determined by major credit rating agencies, or unrated tenants may have a greater risk of default and therefore may have an adverse impact on our returns on that asset and our operating results.

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, approximately 23.5% of our total rental revenue was derived from tenants that had an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency, 16.9% of our our total rental revenue was derived from tenants that were rated but did not have an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency and 59.6% of our total rental revenue was derived from tenants that were not rated. Approximately 4.6% of our total rental revenue was derived from non-rated tenants that were affiliates of companies having an investment grade credit rating. Our investments with tenants that do not have an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency or were not rated and are not affiliated with companies having an investment grade credit rating may have a greater risk of default and bankruptcy than investments in properties leased exclusively to investment grade tenants. When we invest in properties where the tenant does not have a publicly available credit rating, we use certain credit assessment tools as well as rely on our own estimates of the tenant’s credit rating which include but are not limited to reviewing the tenant’s financial information (i.e., financial ratios, net worth, revenue, cash flows, leverage and liquidity) and monitoring local market conditions. If our lender or a credit rating agency disagrees with our ratings estimates, or our ratings estimates are otherwise inaccurate, we may not be able to obtain our desired level of leverage or our financing costs may exceed those that we projected. This outcome could have an adverse impact on our returns on that asset and hence our operating results.

A tenant is considered creditworthy if it has a financial profile that our Advisor believes meets our criteria. In evaluating the creditworthiness of a tenant or prospective tenant, our Advisor will not use specific quantifiable standards, but will consider many factors, including, but not limited to, the financial condition of the tenant and/or guarantor, the operating history of the property with the tenant, the tenant’s market share and track record within its industry segment, the general health and outlook of the tenant’s industry segment, and the lease length and the terms at the time of the property acquisition.

We monitor the credit of our tenants to stay abreast of any material changes in credit quality. We monitor tenant credit by (1) reviewing the credit ratings of tenants (or their parent companies) that are rated by nationally recognized rating agencies, (2) reviewing financial statements that are publicly available or that are required to be delivered to us under the applicable lease, (3) monitoring news reports and other available information regarding our tenants and their underlying businesses, (4) monitoring the timeliness of rent collections, and (5) conducting periodic inspections of our properties to ascertain proper maintenance, repair and upkeep. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we have not identified any material change in any of our tenants' credit quality.

Completion of the REIT Merger is subject to many conditions and if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the REIT Merger will not be completed, which could result in the expenditure of significant unrecoverable transaction costs.

The Merger Agreement is subject to many conditions which must be satisfied or waived in order to complete the REIT Merger. The mutual conditions of the parties include, among others: (i) the approval by the Company’s stockholders of the REIT Merger; and (ii) the absence of any law, order or injunction that would prohibit, restrain, enjoin or make illegal the consummation of the REIT Merger or any judgment, order, decree, award, ruling, decision, verdict, subpoena, injunction or settlement entered, issued, made or rendered by, or any consent agreement, memorandum of understanding or other contract with, any governmental entity of a court of competent jurisdiction in effect preventing, restraining or enjoining the consummation of the REIT Merger. In addition, each party’s obligation to consummate the REIT Merger is subject to certain other conditions, including, among others: (a) the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties (subject to customary materiality qualifiers and other customary exceptions); (b) the other party’s compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement (subject to customary materiality qualifiers); (c) the absence of any change, event, circumstance or development arising during the period from the date of the Merger Agreement until the effective time of the REIT Merger that has had or is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the other party; (d) the receipt of an opinion of counsel of the other party to the effect that such party has been organized and has operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT; and (e) the receipt of an opinion of counsel of each party to the effect that the REIT Merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

There can be no assurance that the conditions to closing of the REIT Merger will be satisfied or waived or that the REIT Merger will be completed. Failure to consummate the REIT Merger may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and business prospects for the following reasons, among others: (i) the Company will incur certain transaction costs, regardless of whether the proposed merger closes, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and ability to make distributions to its stockholders; and (ii) the REIT Merger, whether or not it closes, will divert the attention of certain management and other key employees of the Company from ongoing business activities, including the pursuit of other opportunities that could be beneficial to the Company. In addition, the Company or REIT II may terminate the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, including, among other reasons, if the REIT Merger is not completed by January 31, 2020 (the “Outside Date”). If the REIT Merger is not consummated, the ongoing business of the Company could be adversely affected.

44

Failure to complete the REIT Merger could negatively impact the future business and financial results of the Company.

If the REIT Merger is not completed, the ongoing business of the Company could be adversely affected and the Company will be subject to a variety of risks associated with the failure to complete the REIT Merger, including the following:

• the Company being required, under certain circumstances, to pay to REIT II a termination fee of $28.8 million in the event of termination of the Merger Agreement;

• the Company having to pay certain costs relating to the proposed merger, such as legal, accounting, financial advisor, filing, printing and mailing fees; and

• the diversion of the Company management focus and resources from operational matters and other strategic opportunities while working to implement the REIT Merger.

If the REIT Merger is not completed, these risks could materially affect the business and financial results of the Company.

The pendency of the REIT Merger, including as a result of the restrictions on the operation of the Company’s and REIT II’s business during the period between signing the Merger Agreement and the completion of the REIT Merger, could adversely affect the business and operations of the Company, REIT II, or both.

In connection with the pending REIT Merger, some business partners or vendors of each of the Company and REIT II may delay or defer decisions, which could negatively impact the revenues, earnings, cash flows and expenses of the Company and REIT II, regardless of whether the REIT Merger is completed. In addition, due to operating covenants in the Merger Agreement, each of the Company and REIT II may be unable, during the pendency of the REIT Merger, to pursue certain strategic transactions, undertake certain significant capital projects, undertake certain significant financing transactions and otherwise pursue other actions that are not in the ordinary course of business, even if such actions would prove beneficial.

The Merger Agreement prohibits the Company from soliciting proposals after the Go Shop Period End Time, and places conditions on its ability to negotiate and accept a Superior Proposal, which may adversely affect the Company stockholders.

In the Merger Agreement, the Company agreed that, beginning as of 11:50 p.m. New York City time on May 26, 2019 (the “Go Shop Period End Time”), it will be subject to restrictions relating to, among other things, the initiation, solicitation, knowing encouragement or facilitation of any inquiries, offers, or other actions that constitute or may reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement). After that date, under certain circumstances, if the Company receives an Acquisition Proposal from any person that did not result from a breach of its obligations, and if the Company’s board of directors determines that such Acquisition Proposal is or is reasonably expected to lead to a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the Company’s board of directors may, upon making certain determinations relating to its duties, take certain actions, including furnishing non-public information with respect to the Company (subject to compliance with certain matters) and disclosing to the Company’s stockholders any information required to be disclosed under applicable law.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company’s board of directors may also, upon making certain determinations make an Adverse Recommendation Change (as defined in the Merger Agreement), terminate the Merger Agreement and enter into an agreement relating to a Superior Proposal. The limitations, requirements and conditions described above may make it more unlikely that after the Go Shop Period End Time a proposal relating to an alternative business combination transaction would emerge for the Company and may make it more difficult and expensive for the Company to accept a proposal relating to an alternative business combination transaction that the Company’s special committee determines to be superior to the REIT Merger.

The Merger Agreement, and other agreements contemplated by the Merger Agreement, contain provisions that could discourage a potential competing acquirer of the Company or could result in a competing acquisition proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.

Except for a 45-day go-shop period that expired on May 26, 2019, the Merger Agreement contains provisions that, subject to limited exceptions, restricted the Company’s ability to solicit, initiate or knowingly facilitate, encourage or assist any acquisition proposal. With respect to any written, bona fide acquisition proposal that the Company receives, REIT II generally has an opportunity to offer to modify the terms of the Merger Agreement in response to such proposal before the Company board of directors may change, withdraw, or modify its recommendation to stockholders in response to such acquisition proposal or terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to such acquisition proposal. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under circumstances relating to an acquisition proposal, the Company would have to pay REIT II a termination fee of $28.8 million in connection with a transaction initiated after the go-shop process. In addition, although the Company’s advisor agreed to waive its right to receive a disposition fee in connection with the REIT Merger, in the event the REIT Merger is not consummated, the Company would be responsible for paying a disposition fee in connection with any other competing transaction.

45

These provisions could discourage a potential competing acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of the Company’s business from considering or making a competing acquisition proposal, even if the potential competing acquirer was prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share cash value than that market value proposed to be received or realized in the REIT Merger, or might cause a potential competing acquirer to propose to pay a lower price than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the termination fee that may become payable in certain circumstances under the Merger Agreement.

In certain circumstances, either of the Company or REIT II may terminate the Merger Agreement.

The Company or REIT II may terminate the Merger Agreement if the REIT Merger has not been consummated by the Outside Date. Also, the Merger Agreement may be terminated if a final and non-appealable order is entered prohibiting or disapproving the transaction, upon a material uncured breach by the other party that would cause the closing conditions not to be satisfied, or upon the failure to obtain receipt of approvals of the Company stockholders. In addition, the Company has the right to terminate the Merger Agreement at any time prior to obtaining the necessary approvals of the Company’s stockholders in order to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal (as such terms are defined in the Merger Agreement). Finally, REIT II has the right to terminate the Merger Agreement at any time prior to obtaining the approvals of the Company’s stockholders, upon an Adverse Recommendation Change or upon the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer for any shares of the Company common stock that constitutes an Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement, and other than by REIT II or any of its affiliates), and the Company’s board of directors fails to recommend against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer and to publicly reaffirm the Company’s board of directors recommendation after being requested to do so by the Company.

The Company and REIT II each expect to incur substantial expenses related to the REIT Merger.

The Company and REIT II each expect to incur substantial expenses in connection with completing the REIT Merger and integrating the properties and operations of the Company that REIT II is acquiring with those of REIT II. While the Company and REIT II each has assumed that a certain level of transaction expenses would be incurred, there are a number of factors beyond the control of each company that could affect the total amount or the timing of such expenses. Many of the expenses that will be incurred, by their nature, are difficult to estimate accurately at the present time. As a result, the transaction expenses, including an acquisition fee of approximately $24,035,000 payable to REIT II’s advisor, associated with the REIT Merger could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that REIT II expects to achieve from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings following the completion of the REIT Merger.

An adverse judgment in a lawsuit challenging the REIT Merger may prevent the REIT Merger from becoming effective or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe.

If any purported stockholder files a lawsuit challenging the REIT Merger, the Company cannot assure you as to the outcome of any such lawsuit, including the costs associated with defending these claims or any other liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the litigation or settlement of these claims. If plaintiffs are successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting the parties from completing the REIT Merger on the agreed-upon terms, such an injunction may prevent the completion of the REIT Merger in the expected time frame, or may prevent it from being completed altogether. Whether or not any such plaintiffs’ claims are successful, this type of litigation is often expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect the operations of each company’s business.

If and when the Combined Company completes a Liquidity Event, the market value ascribed to the shares of common stock of the Combined Company upon the Liquidity Event may be significantly lower than the estimated net asset value per share of REIT II considered by the Company’s board of directors in approving and recommending the REIT Merger.

In approving and recommending the REIT Merger, the Company’s board of directors considered, among other things, the most recent estimated value per share of the Company and REIT II as determined by their respective boards of directors with the assistance of their respective third-party valuation experts. The estimated value per share of the REIT II Class A Common Stock will not be immediately updated in connection with the consummation of the REIT Merger. In the event that the Combined Company completes a Liquidity Event after consummation of the REIT Merger, such as a listing of its shares on a national securities exchange, a merger in which stockholders of the Combined Company receive securities that are listed on a national securities exchange, or a sale of the Combined Company for cash, the market value of the shares of the Combined Company upon consummation of such Liquidity Event may be significantly lower than the current estimated value considered by the Company’s board of directors and the estimated value per share of REIT II that may be reflected on the account statements of stockholders of the Combined Company after consummation of the REIT Merger. For example, if the shares of the Combined Company are listed on a national securities exchange at some point after the consummation of the REIT Merger, the trading price of the shares may be significantly lower than the current REIT II Class A Common Stock estimated value per share of $9.25.

46

The Combined Company cannot assure you that it will be able to continue paying distributions at or above the rates currently paid by the Company and REIT II.

The stockholders of the Combined Company may not receive distributions at the same rate they received distributions as the Company’s stockholders and as REIT II stockholders following the REIT Merger for various reasons, including the following:

• the Combined Company may not have enough cash to pay such distributions due to changes in the Combined Company’s cash requirements, capital spending plans, cash flow or financial position;

• decisions on whether, when and in which amounts to make any future distributions will remain at all times entirely at the discretion of the Combined Company’s board of directors, which reserves the right to change REIT II’s current distribution practices at any time and for any reason;

• the Combined Company may desire to retain cash to maintain or improve its credit ratings; and

• the amount of distributions that the Combined Company’s subsidiaries may distribute to the Combined Company may be subject to restrictions imposed by state law, restrictions that may be imposed by state regulators, and restrictions imposed by the terms of any current or future indebtedness that these subsidiaries may incur.

Stockholders of the Combined Company will have no contractual or other legal right to distributions that have not been authorized by the Combined Company’s board of directors and declared by the Combined Company.

If the REIT Merger does not qualify as a tax-free reorganization, there may be adverse tax consequences.

The REIT Merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. The closing of the REIT Merger is conditioned on the receipt by each of the Company and REIT II of an opinion of its counsel to the effect that the REIT Merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. However, these legal opinions will not be binding on the IRS or on the courts. If, for any reason, the REIT Merger were to fail to qualify as a tax-free reorganization, then each the Company stockholder generally would recognize gain or loss, as applicable, equal to the difference between (i) the merger consideration (i.e. the sum of the cash plus the fair market value of the shares of REIT II Class A Common Stock) received by the Company stockholder in the REIT Merger; and (ii) the Company stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in its the Company common stock.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered or otherwise exempt under the Securities Act.

Share Repurchase Program

Our board of directors has adopted a share repurchase program that enables our stockholders to request to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. Our share repurchase program permits stockholders to request to sell their shares back to us, subject to the significant conditions and limitations described below. Repurchases of shares of our common stock are at the sole discretion of our board of directors.

We will limit the number of shares repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year, or the 5.0% Annual Limitation. In addition, the share repurchase program provides that all repurchases during any calendar year, including those upon death or a qualifying disability of a stockholder, are limited to those that can be funded with equivalent reinvestments pursuant to the DRIP during the prior calendar year and other operating funds, if any, as the board of directors, in its sole discretion, may reserve for this purpose. The prices at which we repurchase our shares of common stock are based on the most recent Estimated Per Share NAV, which is $5.33, based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of June 30, 2018.

We will limit the number of shares repurchased each quarter pursuant to the share repurchase program as follows:

• on the first quarter Repurchase Date, we will not repurchase in excess of 2.0% of the number of shares outstanding as of December 31 of the prior calendar year;

• on the second quarter Repurchase Date, we will not repurchase in excess of 1.0% of the number of shares outstanding as of December 31 of the prior calendar year;

• on the third quarter Repurchase Date, we will not repurchase in excess of 1.0% of the number of shares outstanding as of December 31 of the prior calendar year; and

47

• on the fourth quarter Repurchase Date, we will not repurchase in excess of 1.0% of the number of shares outstanding as of December 31 of the prior calendar year.

In the event we do not meet an applicable quarterly share repurchase limitation, we will increase the share limitation in the next quarter and continue to adjust the quarterly share limitations in accordance with the 5.0% Annual Limitation. If we are unable to process all eligible repurchase requests within a quarter due to the limitations described above or in the event sufficient funds are not available, shares will be repurchased as follows: (i) first, pro rata as to repurchases upon the death or Qualifying Disability of a stockholder; and (ii) next, pro rata as to repurchases to stockholders who demonstrate, in the discretion of the Board of Directors, an involuntary exigent circumstance, such as bankruptcy.

A stockholder or his or her estate, heir or beneficiary may present to us fewer than all of the shares then-owned for repurchase. Repurchase requests made (i) on behalf of a deceased stockholder or a stockholder with a qualifying disability; (ii) by a stockholder due to another involuntary exigent circumstance, such as bankruptcy; or (iii) by a stockholder due to a mandatory distribution under such stockholder’s IRA may be made at any time after the occurrence of such event.

A stockholder who wishes to have shares repurchased must mail or deliver to us a written request on a form provided by us and executed by the stockholder, its trustee or authorized agent, which we must receive at least five business days prior to the first day of the quarter in which the stockholder is requesting a repurchase of its shares. An estate, heir or beneficiary that wishes to have shares repurchased following the death of a stockholder must mail or deliver to us a written request on a form provided by us, including evidence acceptable to our board of directors of the death of the stockholder, and executed by the executor or executrix of the estate, the heir or beneficiary, or their trustee or authorized agent, which we must receive at least five business days prior to the first day of the quarter in which the estate, heir, or beneficiary is requesting a repurchase of its shares.

Our Advisor, directors and their respective affiliates are prohibited from receiving a fee in connection with the share repurchase program.

Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may suspend (in whole or in part) the share repurchase program at any time, and may amend, reduce, terminate or otherwise change our share repurchase program at any time upon 30 days' prior notice to our stockholders for any reason it deems appropriate.

Our share repurchase program is only intended to provide our stockholders with limited, interim liquidity for their shares until a liquidity event occurs.

In connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, on April 10, 2019, our board of directors approved the Third Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program, or the Third Amended & Restated SRP, which was effective May 11, 2019, and applied beginning with repurchases made on the 2019 third quarter Repurchase Date (as defined in the Third Amended & Restated SRP). Under the Third Amended & Restated SRP, we will only repurchase shares of common stock in connection with the death, qualifying disability, or involuntary exigent circumstance (as determined by our board of directors, in its sole discretion) of a stockholder, subject to certain terms and conditions specified in the Third Amended & Restated SRP. Further, under the Third Amended & Restated SRP, if we do not repurchase all of the shares for which repurchase requests were submitted in any quarter, outstanding repurchase requests will not automatically roll over to the subsequent quarter.

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we repurchased the following shares of common stock:

Period	Total Number of Shares Repurchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans and Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares Available that may yet be Repurchased under the Program
April 2019	1,822,087	$	5.33	—	$	—
May 2019	26,332	$	5.33	—	$	—
June 2019	9,406	$	5.33	—	$	—
Total	1,857,825			—

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we repurchased approximately $9,903,000 of shares of common stock.

48

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

49

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No:
2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 11, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, and Lightning Merger Sub, LLC (included as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-54675) filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1	Articles of Amendment and Restatement (included as Exhibit 3.4 to the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Commission File No. 333-165643) filed on November 16, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2	First Amendment to Articles of Amendment and Restatement (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-54675) filed on March 31, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3	Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement (included as Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.4	Bylaws of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. (included as Exhibit 3.5 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Commission File No. 333-165643) filed on March 23, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.5	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc (included as Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 000-54675) filed on November 16, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1	Distribution Reinvestment Plan (included as Appendix A to the prospectus dated November 25, 2015 attached to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on November 25, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2	Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. 2010 Restricted Share Plan (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-54675) filed on March 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (included as Exhibit 10.6 to the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Commission File No. 333-165643) filed on June 25, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4	Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (included as Exhibit A to supplement No. 1 to the prospectus to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Commission File No. 333-218152) dated December 29, 2017), filed on December 29, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.1	Second Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, dated April 11, 2019 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-54675), filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2	Third Amended and Restated REIT II Advisory Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-54675), filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3	Termination Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, and Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-54675), filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4	Consent and Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated April 11, 2019, by and between Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, as borrower, KeyBank National Association, the other lenders which are parties to the agreement and other lenders that may become parties to the agreement, and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent (included as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-54675), filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
31.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1	Consent of Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc. (included as Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-54675) filed on October 1, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference).
99.2	Third Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program (included as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-54675), filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*

Filed herewith.

**

Furnished herewith in accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT, INC.
		(Registrant)
Date: August 14, 2019	By:	/s/    MICHAEL A. SETON
		Michael A. Seton
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 14, 2019	By:	/s/    KAY C. NEELY
		Kay C. Neely
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)