0000950123-11-031517.txt : 20110331 0000950123-11-031517.hdr.sgml : 20110331 20110331163556 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950123-11-031517 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: N-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20110131 FILED AS OF DATE: 20110331 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20110331 EFFECTIVENESS DATE: 20110331 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Build America Bond Portfolio CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001475413 IRS NUMBER: 000000000 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: N-Q SEC ACT: 1940 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 811-22351 FILM NUMBER: 11726747 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: TWO INTERNATIONAL PLACE CITY: BOSTON STATE: MA ZIP: 02110 BUSINESS PHONE: 6174828260 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: TWO INTERNATIONAL PLACE CITY: BOSTON STATE: MA ZIP: 02110 0001475413 S000027432 Build America Bond Portfolio C000082733 Build America Bond Portfolio N-Q 1 b85447a1nvq.htm BUILD AMERICA BOND PORTFOLIO Build America Bond Portfolio
 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-Q
QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
811-22351
Investment Company Act File Number
Build America Bond Portfolio
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
October 31
Date of Fiscal Year End
January 31, 2011
Date of Reporting Period
 
 

 


 

Item 1. Schedule of Investments

 


 

Build America Bond Portfolio as of January 31, 2011
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
 
Taxable Municipal Securities — 98.1%(1)
 
                 
Principal
           
Amount
           
(000’s omitted)     Security   Value  
Education — 4.7%
$ 1,875    
University of Texas, 6.276%, 8/15/41
  $ 1,924,238  
  260    
University of Virginia, 6.20%, 9/1/39
    285,659  
                 
            $ 2,209,897  
                 
General Obligations — 24.7%
$ 140    
California, 7.55%, 4/1/39
  $ 145,165  
  1,000    
California, 7.70%, 11/1/30
    1,027,390  
  125    
California, 7.95%, 3/1/36
    128,562  
  1,500    
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 5.85%, 7/15/30
    1,479,570  
  740    
Connecticut, 5.632%, 12/1/29
    738,401  
  1,000    
Denton County, TX, 5.968%, 7/15/35
    1,001,680  
  75    
Denver, CO, City & County School District No. 1, 5.664%, 12/1/33
    74,936  
  1,000    
Detroit, MI, City School District, 7.747%, 5/1/39
    1,049,270  
  225    
Kauai, HI, 5.763%, 8/1/33
    223,153  
  1,000    
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, TN, 5.707%, 7/1/34
    974,380  
  1,030    
Montgomery County, PA, 6.03%, 9/1/39
    1,047,211  
  1,500    
New York, NY, 6.646%, 12/1/31
    1,546,320  
  200    
Oxford, MI, 6.50%, 5/1/39
    192,000  
  1,000    
Santa Monica, CA, Community College District, 6.763%, 8/1/34
    1,006,470  
  400    
Southwest Regional Sanitary Sewer & Water Authority, MI, 6.50%, 4/1/40
    392,268  
  175    
Texas, 5.517%, 4/1/39
    172,209  
  275    
Washington, 5.481%, 8/1/39
    273,859  
                 
            $ 11,472,844  
                 
Hospital — 1.6%
$ 250    
King County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 1, 7.90%, 6/15/30
  $ 250,915  
  500    
King County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 1, 8.00%, 6/15/40
    506,820  
                 
            $ 757,735  
                 
Lease Revenue/Certificates of Participation — 4.4%
$ 1,525    
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 6.561%, 12/15/40
  $ 1,539,060  
  500    
Oregon Department of Administrative Services, 6.18%, 5/1/35
    490,100  
                 
            $ 2,029,160  
                 
Other Revenue — 1.1%
$ 250    
Battery Park City Authority, NY, 6.375%, 11/1/39
  $ 248,500  
  250    
Florida State Board of Education, 6.584%, 7/1/29
    251,488  
                 
            $ 499,988  
                 
Public Power/Electric Utilities — 14.8%
$ 1,000    
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., 7.499%, 2/15/50
  $ 1,026,870  
  1,000    
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, 5.594%, 1/1/42
    895,890  
  1,000    
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, 6.655%, 4/1/57
    964,710  
  1,000    
Nebraska Public Power District, 5.323%, 1/1/30
    908,540  
  1,000    
Northern Illinois Municipal Power Agency, 7.62%, 1/1/30
    1,077,000  
  500    
Orlando, FL, Utilities Commission, 5.662%, 10/1/40
    486,790  
  1,500    
San Antonio, TX, Electric & Gas Revenue, 6.168%, 2/1/41
    1,511,115  
                 
            $ 6,870,915  
                 
Special Tax Revenue — 11.3%
$ 980    
Massachusetts School Building Authority, 5.715%, 8/15/39
  $ 986,174  
  1,000    
Miami-Dade County, FL, Transit Sales Surtax Revenue, 5.534%, 7/1/32
    936,180  
  1,115    
Miami-Dade County, FL, Transit Sales Surtax Revenue, 5.624%, 7/1/40
    1,003,366  
 
1


 

                 
Principal
           
Amount
           
(000’s omitted)     Security   Value  
$ 1,000    
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, 5.508%, 8/1/37
  $ 963,340  
  1,385    
New York Urban Development Corp., 5.77%, 3/15/39
    1,365,929  
                 
            $ 5,254,989  
                 
Transportation — 8.8%
$ 450    
Maryland Transportation Authority, 5.604%, 7/1/30
  $ 442,557  
  500    
Maryland Transportation Authority, 5.888%, 7/1/43
    504,905  
  1,000    
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 7.102%, 1/1/41
    1,061,000  
  1,500    
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 5.511%, 12/1/45
    1,313,220  
  790    
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 6.378%, 12/1/37
    752,767  
                 
            $ 4,074,449  
                 
Water and Sewer — 26.7%
$ 750    
Chesapeake, VA, Water and Sewer Revenue, 6.283%, 7/1/40
  $ 777,608  
  1,460    
Chicago, IL, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, 5.72%, 12/1/38
    1,425,515  
  1,500    
East Bay, CA, Municipal Utility District Water System Revenue, 5.874%, 6/1/40
    1,488,240  
  100    
Jea, FL, Water and Sewer Revenue, 6.21%, 10/1/33
    102,074  
  380    
Knoxville, TN, Wastewater System Revenue, 6.50%, 4/1/43
    388,105  
  1,000    
Los Angeles, CA, Department of Water and Power Waterworks Revenue, 6.008%, 7/1/39
    984,540  
  1,325    
Metropolitan St. Louis, MO, Sewer District Wastewater System Revenue, 5.856%, 5/1/39
    1,317,434  
  1,500    
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 6.538%, 7/1/39
    1,502,580  
  1,525    
New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, 6.452%, 6/15/41
    1,537,856  
  1,000    
San Diego County, CA, Water Authority, 6.138%, 5/1/49
    1,013,840  
  1,000    
Washington County, OR, Clean Water Services, 5.701%, 10/1/30
    991,390  
  1,000    
Williamsport Sanitary Authority, PA, 5.75%, 1/1/40
    887,340  
                 
            $ 12,416,522  
                 
         
Total Taxable Municipal Securities — 98.1%
(identified cost $47,403,071)
  $ 45,586,499  
         
 
Short-Term Investments — 2.8%
 
                 
    Interest
       
Description   (000’s omitted)     Value  
Eaton Vance Cash Reserves Fund, LLC, 0.21%(2)
  $ 1,314     $ 1,314,197  
                 
                 
Total Short-Term Investments — 2.8%
(identified cost $1,314,197)
          $ 1,314,197  
                 
                 
Total Investments — 100.9%
(identified cost $48,717,268)
          $ 46,900,696  
                 
                 
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.9)%
          $ (413,667 )
                 
                 
Net Assets — 100.0%
          $ 46,487,029  
                 
 
             
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
 
At January 31, 2011, the concentration of the Portfolio’s investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of net assets, is as follows:
             
             
        California   15.7%
             
        New York   12.2%
        Pennsylvania   11.8%
        Others, representing less than 10% individually   61.2%
         
(1)
      Build America Bonds. Represent taxable municipal obligations issued pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 or other legislation providing for the issuance of taxable municipal debt on which the issuer receives federal support.
         
(2)
      Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of January 31, 2011. Net income allocated from the investment in Eaton Vance Cash Reserves Fund, LLC for the fiscal year to date ended January 31, 2011 was $495.
 
2


 

The Portfolio did not have any open financial instruments at January 31, 2011.
 
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at January 31, 2011, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
 
         
Aggregate cost
  $ 48,759,609  
         
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 173,743  
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (2,032,656 )
         
Net unrealized depreciation
  $ (1,858,913 )
         
 
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
 
  •   Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
 
  •   Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
 
  •   Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
 
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
 
At January 31, 2011, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
 
                                 
    Quoted Prices in
                   
    Active Markets for
    Significant Other
    Significant
       
    Identical Assets     Observable Inputs     Unobservable Inputs        
       
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total  
   
Taxable Municipal Securities
  $     $ 45,586,499     $     $ 45,586,499  
Short-Term Investments
          1,314,197             1,314,197  
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 46,900,696     $     $ 46,900,696  
 
 
 
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2010 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs. At January 31, 2011, the value of investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2, if any, during the fiscal year to date then ended was not significant.
 
For information on the Portfolio’s policy regarding the valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to the Portfolio’s most recent financial statements included in its semiannual or annual report to shareholders.
 
Subsequent Events
 
As of the close of business on February 28, 2011, the Eaton Vance Build America Bond Fund withdrew its entire interest in the Portfolio in cash and securities. On March 11, 2011, the Portfolio terminated.
 
3


 

Item 2. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this Form N-Q has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this Form N-Q has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter for which the report is being filed that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 


 

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
Build America Bond Portfolio
 
   
By:   /s/ Cynthia J. Clemson      
  Cynthia J. Clemson     
  President     
 
Date: March 24, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
         
     
By:   /s/ Cynthia J. Clemson      
  Cynthia J. Clemson     
  President     
 
Date: March 24, 2011
         
     
By:   /s/ Barbara E. Campbell      
  Barbara E. Campbell     
  Treasurer     
 
Date: March 24, 2011

 

EX-99.CERT 2 b85447a1exv99wcert.htm EX-99.CERT SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION EX-99.CERT Section 302 Certification
Build America Bond Portfolio
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
I, Cynthia J. Clemson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-Q of Build America Bond Portfolio;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the schedule of investments included in this report fairly present in all material respects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which the report is being filed;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 


 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
By:   /s/ Cynthia J. Clemson      
  Cynthia J. Clemson     
  President     
 
Date: March 24, 2011

 


 

Build America Bond Portfolio
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
I, Barbara E. Campbell, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-Q of Build America Bond Portfolio;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the schedule of investments included in this report fairly present in all material respects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which the report is being filed;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 


 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
By:   /s/ Barbara E. Campbell      
  Barbara E. Campbell     
  Treasurer     
 
Date: March 24, 2011