EX-99.2 3 q22021mda.htm EX-99.2 Document
Exhibit 99.2

image_0a.jpg
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For the periods ended June 30, 2021


This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) for Cenovus Energy Inc. (which includes references to “we”, “our”, “us”, “its”, the “Company”, or “Cenovus”, and means Cenovus Energy Inc., the subsidiaries of, and partnership interests held by, Cenovus Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries) dated July 28, 2021 should be read in conjunction with our June 30, 2021 unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes (“interim Consolidated Financial Statements”), the December 31, 2020 audited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes (“Consolidated Financial Statements”) and the December 31, 2020 MD&A (“annual MD&A”). All of the information and statements contained in this MD&A are made as of July 28, 2021, unless otherwise indicated. This MD&A contains forward-looking information about our current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions. See the Advisory for information on the risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially and the assumptions underlying our forward-looking information. Cenovus management (“Management”) prepared the MD&A. The interim MD&As and the annual MD&A are reviewed by the Audit Committee and recommended for approval by the Cenovus Board of Directors (“the Board”). Additional information about Cenovus, including our quarterly and annual reports, the Annual Information Form (“AIF”) and Form 40-F, is available on SEDAR at sedar.com, on EDGAR at sec.gov, and on our website at cenovus.com. Information on or connected to our website, even if referred to in this MD&A, does not constitute part of this MD&A.
On January 1, 2021, pursuant to a plan of arrangement under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta), Husky Energy Inc. (“Husky”) became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cenovus. Husky was subsequently amalgamated with Cenovus on March 31, 2021 (the “amalgamation”) under the Canada Business Corporations Act and ceased to make separate filings as a reporting issuer. Unless the context requires otherwise, any reference herein to Husky refers to the business and operations of Husky prior to the amalgamation. In connection with its acquisition of Husky and in accordance with applicable securities laws, Cenovus filed a business acquisition report on March 26, 2021 containing the pro forma financial statements of the combined company as at December 31, 2020. Additional information concerning Husky’s business and assets as at December 31, 2020 may be found in the annual information form of Husky dated February 8, 2021 for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Husky AIF”) and Husky’s management’s discussion and analysis of the financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the "Husky MD&A"), each of which is filed and available on SEDAR under Husky’s profile at sedar.com.

Basis of Presentation
This MD&A and the interim Consolidated Financial Statements and comparative information have been prepared in Canadian dollars, (which includes references to “dollar” or “$”), except where another currency has been indicated, and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS” or “GAAP”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Production volumes are presented on a before royalties basis.
Non-GAAP Measures and Additional Subtotals
Certain financial measures in this document do not have a standardized meaning as prescribed by IFRS, such as Netbacks, Adjusted Funds Flow, Free Funds Flow, Net Debt, Capitalization and Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) and therefore are considered non-GAAP measures. In addition, Operating Margin is considered an additional subtotal found in Note 1 of our interim Consolidated Financial Statements. These measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. These measures have been described and presented in order to provide shareholders and potential investors with additional measures for analyzing our ability to generate funds to finance our operations and information regarding our liquidity. This additional information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. The definition and reconciliation, if applicable, of each non-GAAP measure or additional subtotal is presented in the Operating and Financial Results, Liquidity and Capital Resources, or Advisory sections of this MD&A.
1


OVERVIEW OF CENOVUS
We are a Canadian-based integrated energy company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta. Our common shares and warrants are listed on the Toronto (“TSX”) and New York (“NYSE”) stock exchanges. Our cumulative redeemable preferred shares Series 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 are listed on the TSX. We are the third largest Canadian-based crude oil and natural gas producer and the second largest Canadian-based refiner and upgrader, with operations in Canada, the United States (“U.S.”) and the Asia Pacific region. Our upstream operations include oil sands projects in northern Alberta, thermal and conventional crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) projects across Western Canada, crude oil production offshore Newfoundland and Labrador and natural gas and NGLs production offshore China and Indonesia. Our downstream operations include upgrading, refining and retail operations in Canada and the U.S.
Our operations involve activities across the full value chain to develop, transport, produce and market crude oil and natural gas in Canada and internationally. Our physically integrated upstream and downstream operations help us mitigate the impact of volatility in light-heavy crude oil differentials and contributes to our bottom line by capturing value from crude oil and natural gas production through to the sale of finished products like transportation fuels.
During the three months ended June 30, 2021, crude oil production from our Oil Sands assets averaged 549.4 thousand barrels per day which is generally aligned with our downstream crude oil throughput of 539.0 thousand barrels per day. Total upstream production averaged 765.9 thousand barrels of oil equivalent (“BOE”) per day.
Cenovus and Husky Arrangement
On January 1, 2021, Cenovus and Husky Energy Inc. (“Husky”) closed the transaction to combine the two companies through a plan of arrangement (the “Arrangement”) pursuant to which Cenovus acquired all the issued and outstanding common shares of Husky in exchange for common shares and common share purchase warrants of Cenovus. In addition, all of the issued and outstanding Husky preferred shares were exchanged for Cenovus preferred shares with substantially identical terms.
The Arrangement combines high quality oil sands and heavy oil assets with extensive trading, supply and logistics infrastructure, and downstream assets, which creates opportunities to optimize the margin captured across the heavy oil value chain. With the combination of processing capacity and market access outside Alberta for the majority of the Company’s oil sands and heavy oil production, exposure to Alberta heavy oil price differentials is reduced while maintaining exposure to global commodity prices.
Our Strategy
Our strategy remains focused on maximizing shareholder value through cost leadership and realizing the best margins for our products. Our diverse and integrated portfolio will help us to deliver stable cash flow through price cycles while maintaining safe and reliable operations. The Company has a cost-and-market-advantaged asset portfolio, and prioritizes free funds flow generation, balance sheet strength and returns to shareholders. We remain focused on reducing Net Debt (as defined in this MD&A) and sustainably growing shareholder returns. We believe that maintaining a strong balance sheet will help Cenovus navigate through commodity price volatility.
Our financial framework has established an interim Net Debt target of $10 billion and longer term, $8 billion or lower which is in line with a target of a Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of less than two times at the bottom of the cycle, which we see as approximately US$45 per barrel WTI. We plan to use our capital allocation framework to evaluate disciplined investments in our portfolio against dividends, share repurchases and managing to the optimal debt level while maintaining investment grade status. Environmental, Social and Governance ("ESG") considerations are embedded into our framework and business plan. Our investment focus will be on areas where we believe we have the greatest competitive advantage to generate the highest returns.
On January 28, 2021, we announced our 2021 budget focused on sustaining capital and generating Free Funds Flow to strengthen the balance sheet, accelerated by capturing transaction-related synergies across the organization. 2021 guidance dated January 28, 2021, and updated on July 28, 2021, is available on our website at cenovus.com.
Our Operations
The Company operates through the following reportable segments:
Upstream Segments
Oil Sands, includes the development and production of bitumen and heavy oil in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan. Cenovus’s oil sands assets include Foster Creek, Christina Lake, Sunrise (jointly owned with BP Canada Energy Group ULC (“BP Canada”) and operated by Cenovus) and Tucker oil sands projects, as well as Lloydminster thermal and cold and enhanced oil recovery ("EOR") assets. Cenovus jointly owns and operates pipeline gathering systems and terminals through the equity-accounted investment in Husky Midstream Limited Partnership (“HMLP”). The sale and transportation of Cenovus’s production and third-party commodity trading volumes are managed and marketed
2


through access to capacity on third-party pipelines and storage facilities in both Canada and the U.S. to optimize product mix, delivery points, transportation commitments and customer diversification.
Conventional, includes assets rich in NGLs and natural gas within the Elmworth-Wapiti, Kaybob‑Edson, Clearwater and Rainbow Lake operating areas in Alberta and British Columbia and interests in numerous natural gas processing facilities. Cenovus’s NGLs and natural gas production is marketed and transported with other third-party commodity trading volumes through access to capacity on third-party pipelines, export terminals and storage facilities, which provides flexibility for market access to optimize product mix, delivery points, transportation commitments and customer diversification.
Offshore, includes offshore operations, exploration and development activities in China and the east coast of Canada, as well as the equity-accounted investment in the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. (“HCML”) joint venture in Indonesia.
Downstream Segments
Canadian Manufacturing, includes the owned and operated Lloydminster upgrading and asphalt refining complex which upgrades heavy oil into synthetic crude oil, diesel fuel and asphalt. Cenovus seeks to maximize the value per barrel from its heavy oil production through its integrated network of assets. In addition, Cenovus owns and operates the Bruderheim crude-by-rail terminal and two ethanol plants. Cenovus also markets its production and third-party commodity trading volumes of synthetic crude oil, asphalt and ancillary products.
U.S. Manufacturing, includes the refining of crude oil to produce diesel fuel, gasoline, jet fuel, asphalt and other products at the wholly-owned Lima Refinery and Superior Refinery, the Wood River and Borger refineries (jointly owned with operator Phillips 66) and the Toledo Refinery (jointly owned with operator BP Products North America Inc. (“BP”)). Cenovus also markets its own and third-party volumes of refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel and jet fuel.
Retail, includes the marketing of our own and third-party volumes of refined petroleum products, including gasoline and diesel, through retail, commercial and bulk petroleum outlets, as well as wholesale channels in Canada.
Corporate and Eliminations, primarily includes Cenovus-wide costs for general and administrative, financing activities, foreign exchange gain or loss and gain or loss on risk management on corporate related derivative instruments. Eliminations include adjustments for internal usage of natural gas production between segments, transloading services provided to the Oil Sands segment by the Company’s crude-by-rail terminal and crude oil production used as feedstock by the Canadian Manufacturing and U.S. Manufacturing segments. Eliminations are recorded at transfer prices based on current market prices.
To conform to the presentation adopted for the current period’s operating segments, the following comparatives prior to January 1, 2021, have been reclassified:
The Company’s market optimization activities, previously reported in the Refining and Marketing segment, have been reclassified to the Oil Sands and Conventional segments.
The Bruderheim crude-by-rail terminal results, previously reported under the Refining and Marketing segment, have been reclassified to the Canadian Manufacturing segment.
The refining activities in the U.S. with operator Phillips 66, previously reported in the Refining and Marketing segment, have been reclassified to the U.S. Manufacturing segment.
The Company’s unrealized gain and loss on risk management, previously reported in the Corporate and Eliminations segment, have been reclassified to the reportable segment to which the derivative instrument relates.
The Arrangement was accounted for using the acquisition method pursuant to IFRS 3, “Business Combinations”. Under the acquisition method, assets and liabilities are measured at their estimated fair value on the date of acquisition with the exception of income tax, stock-based compensation, lease liabilities and right-of-use (“ROU”) assets. The total consideration was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Comparative figures in this MD&A include Cenovus results prior to the closing of the Arrangement on January 1, 2021, and does not reflect any historical data from Husky. Significant differences on operating and financial results compared with 2020 are primarily the result of the Arrangement.
The preliminary purchase price allocation is based on Management’s best estimate of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company will finalize the value of net assets acquired by December 31, 2021, and adjustments to initial estimates, including goodwill, may be required. No significant adjustments were made to the preliminary purchase price allocation as at June 30, 2021.
3


QUARTERLY RESULTS OVERVIEW
During the second quarter, we continued to build on our strong operational performance in the first quarter with our integrated asset base and the improving commodity price environment driving financial results. The strong results helped us reduce our net debt by nearly $1 billion during the three months ended June 30, 2021.
During the quarter we sold our GORR interest in Marten Hills for gross cash proceeds of approximately $100 million. We also entered into definitive agreements to sell assets within the Conventional segment located in the East Clearwater area and the Kaybob area for combined gross proceeds of approximately $110 million. The Kaybob transaction closed in July and the East Clearwater transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021.
Cenovus also focused on health and safety as our top priority while maintaining our low operating and capital cost structure.
Six Months
Ended
June 30,
202120202019
($ millions, except where indicated)20212020Q2Q1Q4Q3Q2Q1Q4Q3Q2
Production Volumes (MBOE/d)
767.6 474.0 765.9 769.3 467.2 471.8 465.4 482.6 467.4 448.5 443.3 
Crude Throughput (1) (Mbbls/d)
504.2 191.7 539.0 469.1 169.0 191.1 162.3 221.1 227.9 232.4 237.0 
Revenues (2)
19,727 6,135 10,577 9,150 3,426 3,659 2,174 3,961 4,838 4,736 5,603 
Operating Margin (3)
4,063 (298)2,184 1,879 625 594 291 (589)864 1,080 1,277 
Cash From (Used in) Operating
   Activities
1,597 (709)1,369 228 250 732 (834)125 740 834 1,275 
Adjusted Funds Flow (4)
2,958 (623)1,817 1,141 333 407 (469)(154)679 917 1,075 
Net Earnings (Loss)444 (2,032)224 220 (153)(194)(235)(1,797)113 187 1,784 
Per Share ($) (5)
0.21 (1.65)0.11 0.10 (0.12)(0.16)(0.19)(1.46)0.09 0.15 1.45 
Capital Investment (6)
1,081 451 534 547 242 148 147 304 317 294 248 
Net Debt (7)
12,390 8,232 12,390 13,340 7,184 7,530 8,232 7,421 6,513 6,802 7,088 
Cash Dividends
Common Shares71 77 36 35 — — — 77 77 60 62 
Per Common Share ($)
0.0350 0.0625 0.0175 0.0175 — — — 0.0625 0.0625 0.0500 0.0500 
Preferred Shares17 — 8 — — — — — — — 
(1)Represents Cenovus’s net interest in refining operations. The comparative periods have been restated to Cenovus’s net interest.
(2)Comparative figures have been re-presented for portion of inventory write-downs reclassified to royalties.
(3)Additional subtotal found in Note 1 of the interim Consolidated Financial Statements and defined in this MD&A.
(4)Non-GAAP measure defined in this MD&A. Comparative figures have been restated to conform with the definition in this MD&A.
(5)Represented on a basic and diluted per share basis.
(6)Includes expenditures on property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) and exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) assets.
(7)Non-GAAP measure defined in this MD&A. Includes long-term debt and short-term borrowings assumed at fair value of $6,642 million as part of the Arrangement.
Crude oil prices and market crack spreads continued to improve in the second quarter compared with the first quarter and the first six months of 2020. Rebounding crude oil global demand amid roll out efforts of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) vaccines, economic recoveries, and declines in crude oil inventories drove improved commodity markets.
Operationally, variables under Management's control performed very well. Our upstream production averaged 765.9 thousand BOE per day in the second quarter, compared with 465.4 thousand BOE per day in the second quarter of 2020. Assets acquired in the Arrangement averaged 286.8 thousand BOE per day during the quarter. Christina Lake increased production compared with 2020, and Foster Creek production declined slightly compared with 2020 as we completed a planned maintenance turnaround. Our Lloydminster thermal assets continue to perform well as we apply our operating strategy and production and well delivery techniques.
Our downstream crude throughput averaged 539.0 thousand barrels per day in the second quarter compared with 162.3 thousand barrels per day in the second quarter of 2020. Assets acquired in the Arrangement averaged 330.1 thousand barrels per day of crude throughput during the quarter. The Lloydminster Upgrader and Lloydminster Refinery ran near capacity throughout the quarter. Our U.S. refineries had increased utilization rates driven by increased demand, partially offset by the impact of planned and unplanned outages.
4


In the second quarter we incurred $46 million of integration expenditures, including capital of $12 million. Year-to-date expenditures, including capital, are approximately $291 million of the $400 million to $450 million expected in 2021 as integration work continues throughout the year.
Following the close of the Arrangement we anticipated that we could achieve approximately $600 million in run-rate synergies within the first six months of 2021. We have achieved this objective.
We prioritize ongoing ESG leadership and integration of sustainability considerations into our business decisions. During the quarter, we announced the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero initiative, an alliance of peers working collectively with the federal and provincial governments with a goal to achieve net zero greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions from oil sands operations by 2050.
In the second quarter we:
Generated cash flow from operating activities of $1,369 million. Adjusted funds flow was $1,817 million and capital investment was $534 million, resulting in Free Funds Flow of $1,283 million.
Generated an operating margin of $2,184 million compared with $291 million in the second quarter of 2020, primarily due to higher average realized crude oil, NGLs and natural gas sales prices, higher market crack spreads, and increased sales volumes from assets acquired in the Arrangement.
Reduced our net debt by nearly $1 billion.
Sold our GORR interest in Marten Hills for gross cash proceeds of approximately $100 million.
We expect our total capital expenditures to be between $2.3 billion and $2.7 billion in 2021, including sustaining capital of approximately $2.1 billion, and $520 million to $570 million (excluding insurance proceeds) for the Superior Refinery rebuild. We will continue to be disciplined with our capital. Our updated guidance dated July 28, 2021 is available on our website at cenovus.com.
Cenovus remains committed to the health and safety of its workforce and the public while providing essential services. Physical distancing measures continue to be in place to maintain the health and safety of our people and to help mitigate the risk of COVID-19 at our workplaces. We continue to monitor the changing COVID-19 situation and respond accordingly in a timely manner. Work-from-home measures remained in place for the quarter and continue to be in place for all non-essential staff at our combined offices and worksites in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, pending further review. The full scope of our operations will continue to take direction from local health authorities regarding their COVID-19 workplace mandates. Staff levels at sites and offices have and will continue to follow guidance received from the applicable federal, provincial, state and local governments and public health officials.
5


OPERATING AND FINANCIAL RESULTS
Selected Operating Results
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
Percent ChangePercent Change
2021202020212020
Upstream Production Volumes
Oil Sands (Mbbls/d)
Foster Creek156.8(6)166.0159.9(3)164.9
Christina Lake230.511 207.2226.75 215.2
Sunrise (1)
22.425.1
Lloydminster Thermal97.796.9
Tucker21.222.2
Lloydminster Cold/EOR20.820.7
Total Oil Sands Crude Oil
549.447 373.2551.545 380.1
Conventional (MBOE/d)
141.353 92.2138.648 93.9
Offshore (MBOE/d)
Asia Pacific (2)
57.859.3
Atlantic15.216.1
Offshore Total
73.075.4
Total Production Volumes (MBOE/d)
765.965 465.4767.662 474.0
Total Upstream Sales Volumes (3) (MBOE/d)
673.366 406.5681.862 421.2
Downstream Manufacturing Crude Throughput
Canadian Manufacturing (Mbbls/d)
Lloydminster Upgrader
76.177.2
Lloydminster Refinery
27.427.6
Canadian Manufacturing Total
103.5104.8
U.S. Manufacturing (Mbbls/d)
Lima Refinery
160.9142.9
Wood River and Borger refineries (1)
208.929 162.3189.6(1)191.7
Toledo Refinery (1)
65.766.9
U.S. Manufacturing Total
435.5168 162.3399.4108 191.7
Total Throughput (Mbbls/d)
539.0232 162.3504.2163 191.7
Retail (millions of litres/d)
Fuel sales, including wholesale6.76.6
(1)Represents Cenovus’s 50 percent interest in Sunrise, Wood River, Borger and Toledo operations.
(2)Reported production volumes reflect Cenovus’s 40 percent interest in the Madura-BD gas project. Revenues and expenses related to the HCML joint venture are accounted for using the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes.
(3)Has been reduced for natural gas volumes used for internal consumption by the Oil Sands segment of 510 MMcf/d and 515 MMcf/d for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively (334 MMcf/d and 340 MMcf/d for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively).

6


Upstream Production Volumes
image5a.jpg
Our Oil Sands assets continued their strong performance from the first quarter of 2021. Christina Lake production increased from the first quarter as wells came online. We had a planned turnaround and operational outages at Foster Creek which lowered production compared with the first quarter. Assets acquired in the Arrangement averaged 162.1 thousand barrels per day in the second quarter. Our Lloydminster thermal assets continue to perform well as we apply our operating strategy and production and well delivery techniques. We completed planned maintenance turnaround at Sunrise during the quarter, impacting production.
Conventional production increased compared with the first quarter of 2021 as new wells were brought online. Assets acquired in the Arrangement continued their strong performance, averaging 51.7 thousand BOE per day during the quarter.
In the second quarter, Offshore production declined marginally compared with the first quarter of 2021 averaging 73.0 thousand BOE per day. This was due to planned maintenance in China and Indonesia. Offshore production is entirely from assets acquired in the Arrangement.
Downstream Manufacturing
Crude Throughput by Segment
imagea.jpg
Crude throughput increased compared with the first quarter as the market continued to improve. During the second quarter, our U.S. refineries averaged a crude utilization rate of 87 percent driven by increased demand, partially offset by the impact of planned and unplanned outages. The Lloydminster Upgrader and Lloydminster Refinery ran at or near capacity throughout the first half of 2021.
7


At the Wood River and Borger refineries, throughput was impacted by planned maintenance turnarounds that began in the first quarter. The turnaround at Borger was completed in early April and the turnaround at Wood River was completed in mid-May. Throughput at the Wood River and Borger refineries was further impacted, temporarily, by unplanned outages during the second quarter. In addition, the Wood River refinery implemented crude rate reductions in line with market demand.
At the Lima Refinery, throughput was affected in the first quarter of 2021 by a temporary unplanned outage and the impact of winter storm Uri on a key pipeline supplying the Lima Refinery’s feedstock. Throughput ramped up in March as market crack spreads improved. In the second quarter, planned third-party maintenance at the Mid-Valley and West Texas Gulf pipelines reduced throughput, which ramped up upon completion of the maintenance.
At the Toledo Refinery, throughput was optimized in line with market demand in the first half of 2021.
Further information on the changes in our financial and operating results can be found in the Reportable Segments section of this MD&A. Information on our risk management activities can be found in the Risk Management and Risk Factors section of this MD&A and in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Selected Consolidated Financial Results
Operating Margin
Operating Margin is an additional subtotal found in Note 1 of the interim Consolidated Financial Statements and is used to provide a consistent measure of the cash generating performance of our assets for comparability of our underlying financial performance between periods. Operating Margin is defined as revenues less purchased product, transportation and blending, operating expenses, plus realized gains less realized losses on risk management activities. Items within the Corporate and Eliminations segment are excluded from the calculation of Operating Margin.
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
($ millions)2021
2020 (1)
2021
2020 (1)
Gross Sales12,386 2,286 23,058 6,524 
Less: Royalties533 21 906 75 
Revenues11,853 2,265 22,152 6,449 
Expenses
Purchased Product6,363 762 11,430 2,959 
Transportation and Blending1,802 651 3,602 2,579 
Operating Expenses1,306 502 2,608 1,126 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management Activities198 59 449 83 
Operating Margin2,184 291 4,063 (298)
(1)Inventory write-downs prior to January 1, 2021, have been reclassified to royalties, purchased product, transportation and blending or operating expenses to conform with the current presentation of inventory write-downs.
Operating Margin by Segment
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
image1a.jpg


8


Operating Margin increased in the second quarter of 2021 compared with 2020 primarily due to:
Higher average crude oil, NGLs and natural gas sales prices resulting from higher benchmark pricing.
Increased upstream and refined products sales volumes from assets acquired in the Arrangement.
Increased crude throughput and higher market crack spreads.
These increases in Operating Margin were partially offset by:
Increased blending costs due to higher condensate prices.
Product inventory write-downs recognized in the first quarter of 2020 of $345 million and $243 million related to our upstream and downstream assets, respectively, and mostly sold in the second quarter of 2020.
Higher realized risk management losses due to the settlement of benchmark prices relative to our risk management contract prices.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
image2a.jpg
Operating Margin increased in the first half of 2021 compared with 2020 primarily due to:
Higher average crude oil, NGLs and natural gas sales prices resulting from higher benchmark pricing.
Increased upstream sales volumes from assets acquired in the Arrangement.
Higher Operating Margin from our Canadian Manufacturing and U.S. Manufacturing segments primarily due to increased crude throughput and higher market crack spreads.
These increases in Operating Margin were partially offset by increased blending costs due to higher condensate prices, and higher realized risk management losses due to the settlement of benchmark prices relative to our risk management contract prices.
Cash From (Used in) Operating Activities and Adjusted Funds Flow
Adjusted Funds Flow is a non-GAAP measure commonly used in the oil and gas industry to assist in measuring a company’s ability to finance its capital programs and meet its financial obligations. Adjusted Funds Flow is defined as cash from (used in) operating activities excluding settlement of decommissioning liabilities and net change in non-cash working capital. Non-cash working capital is composed of accounts receivable, inventories (excluding non-cash inventory write-downs and reversals), income tax receivable, accounts payable and income tax payable.

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
($ millions)2021202020212020
Cash From (Used in) Operating Activities1,369 (834)1,597 (709)
(Add) Deduct:
Settlement of Decommissioning Liabilities
(18)(2)(29)(33)
Net Change in Non-Cash Working Capital(430)(363)(1,332)(53)
Adjusted Funds Flow (1)
1,817 (469)2,958 (623)
(1)The comparative period has been restated to conform with the current period definition of Adjusted Funds Flow.
9


Cash From Operating Activities and Adjusted Funds Flow were higher in the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared with 2020 due to increased Operating Margin, as discussed above, combined with distributions received from equity-accounted affiliates. The increase was partially offset by higher finance costs and higher general and administrative expenses. The change in non-cash working capital in the second quarter of 2021 was primarily due to an increase in inventories and accounts receivable, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable on June 30, 2021 compared with March 31, 2021.
In the three months ended June 30, 2021, the increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to higher commodity prices partially offset by the receipt of insurance proceeds from the Superior Refinery rebuild project. The increase in inventory was primarily due to higher crude oil inventory related to Foster Creek and Christina Lake combined with higher crude oil and finished goods inventory at Lima. The increase in accounts payable relates to higher feedstock prices in the U.S. Manufacturing segment combined with higher risk management liabilities in the Oil Sands segment.
Cash From Operating Activities and Adjusted Funds Flow were higher in the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared with the first half of 2020 due to increased Operating Margin, as discussed above, combined with distributions received from equity-accounted affiliates. The increase was partially offset by integration costs of $257 million, and long-term incentives of $111 million paid related to the accelerated payout to our employees in connection with the Arrangement, higher finance costs and increased general and administrative expenses. The change in non-cash working capital in the first half of 2021 was primarily due to an increase in inventories and accounts receivable, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable on June 30, 2021 compared with December 31, 2020.
In the six months ended June 30, 2021 the increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to the higher crude oil and refined product pricing in the Oil Sands and U.S. Manufacturing segment, partially offset by lower sales volumes exiting the quarter at Foster Creek and Christina Lake compared with December 2020. The increase in inventory compared with 2020 was primarily due to higher commodity prices and refined product pricing, combined with higher Foster Creek and Christina Lake volumes held in inventory. The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to higher crude oil and feedstock prices combined with an increase in risk management liabilities, partially offset by the settlement of the integration costs, long-term incentive costs to Cenovus employees and the payment of long-term incentives liability assumed as part of the Arrangement.
Net Earnings (Loss)
($ millions)Three Months EndedSix Months
Ended
Net Earnings (Loss) for the Periods Ended June 30, 2020(235)(2,032)
Increase (Decrease) due to:
Operating Margin1,893 4,361 
Corporate and Eliminations:
Unrealized Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss)(96)700 
Re-measurement of Contingent Payment(185)(502)
Integration costs(34)(257)
General and Administrative(74)(260)
Finance costs(93)(230)
Other (1)
24 13 
Unrealized Risk Management Gain (Loss)(276)(122)
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(456)(558)
Exploration Expense (3)
Income Tax Recovery (Expense)(244)(666)
Net Earnings (Loss) for the Periods Ended June 30, 2021224 444 
(1)Includes interest income, realized foreign exchange (gains) losses, (gain) loss on divestiture of assets, other (income) loss, net, and share of income (loss) from equity-accounted affiliates, and Corporate and Eliminations revenues, purchased product, transportation and blending, operating expenses, and (gain) loss on risk management.
Net Earnings of $224 million in the second quarter of 2021 was significantly higher than the Net Loss of $235 million in 2020 due to higher Operating Margin, as discussed above. The increase was partially offset by higher unrealized risk management losses, lower unrealized foreign exchange gains, a loss on the re-measurement of the contingent payment of $249 million (2020 – $64 million), and increased finance expenses, depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) expense and income tax expense as result of the Arrangement.
On a year-to-date basis, Net Earnings of $444 million was significantly higher than the Net Loss of $2,032 million in the first half of 2020 due to higher Operating Margin, as discussed above, an impairment loss of $315 million in the first quarter of 2020, and gains on unrealized foreign exchange compared with losses in 2020. This was partially offset by a loss on the re-measurement of the contingent payment of $436 million (2020 – $66 million gain), integration costs of $257 million, and higher general and administrative costs, finance costs, DD&A expense and income tax expense as a result of the Arrangement.
10


Net Debt
Net Debt is a non-GAAP measure used to monitor our capital structure. Net Debt is defined as short-term borrowings, and the current and long-term portions of long-term debt, net of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.
($ millions) As at
June 30,
2021
December 31,
2020
Short-Term Borrowings65 121 
Long-Term Debt, including current portion13,380 7,441 
Less: Cash and Cash Equivalents(1,055)(378)
Net Debt12,390 7,184 
Net Debt on January 1, 2021, was $13.1 billion, including the fair value of $5.9 billion assumed from the Arrangement. Since the Arrangement, we have reduced our net debt by $701 million, including nearly $1 billion during the second quarter of 2021.
Capital Investment (1) (2)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
($ millions)2021202020212020
Upstream
Oil Sands201 78 419 272 
Conventional28 11 94 27 
Offshore35 — 61 — 
264 89 574 299 
Downstream
Canadian Manufacturing10 14 17 
U.S. Manufacturing237 39 442 90 
Retail5 — 6 — 
252 46 462 107 
Corporate and Eliminations18 12 45 45 
Capital Investment534 147 1,081 451 
(1)Includes expenditures on PP&E and E&E assets.
(2)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
Oil Sands capital investment in the first six months of 2021 was primarily for sustaining production focused at Christina Lake, Foster Creek and the Lloydminster thermal assets.
Conventional capital investment focused on predictable short cycle, high return development wells which are expected to improve underlying cost structures through volume enhancement and offset natural declines.
Offshore capital investment in the first six months of 2021 was primarily preservation capital for the West White Rose project in the Atlantic. The West White Rose project was deferred in March of 2020 and remains deferred for 2021 while we continue to evaluate options with our partners.
U.S. Manufacturing capital investment focused primarily on the Superior Refinery rebuild, combined with refining reliability, maintenance and yield optimization projects at the Wood River and Borger refineries.
11


Drilling Activity
Gross Stratigraphic
Test Wells
Gross Production
Wells (1)
Six months ended June 30,2021202020212020
Foster Creek17 38  — 
Christina Lake25 42 9 — 
Lloydminster Thermal — 15 — 
Lloydminster Cold/EOR — 2 — 
Other (2)
17 75  — 
59 155 26 — 
(1)Steam-assisted gravity drainage (“SAGD”) well pairs in the Oil Sands segment are counted as a single producing well.
(2)Includes Narrows Lake and new resource plays.
Stratigraphic test wells were drilled to help identify well pad locations for sustaining wells and to further progress the evaluation of other assets.

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020
(net wells, unless otherwise stated)DrilledCompletedTied-inDrilledCompletedTied-in
Conventional11 13 12 — — 
There were no wells drilled, completed or tied-in during the first six months of 2021 in the Offshore segment.
Future Capital Investment
Upon further review of our capital program, we have updated our guidance estimates. The capital guidance range remains the same. However, our guidance now reflects an increase to Oil Sands capital investment by $100 million, offset by a reduction to U.S. Manufacturing, Canadian Manufacturing, and Retail totaling $100 million.
Our Oil Sands capital investment for 2021 is forecast to be between $950 million and $1,050 million, focused primarily on sustaining production at Christina Lake, Foster Creek and the Lloydminster thermal assets. Our Oil Sands production is expected to range between 540.0 thousand barrels per day and 596.0 thousand barrels per day.
Our Conventional capital investment for 2021 is forecast to be between $170 million and $210 million. This includes economic development in various plays to generate strong returns, improve underlying cost structures through volume enhancement and offset declines. Our Conventional production is expected to range between 131.0 thousand BOE per day and 140.0 thousand BOE per day.
Our Offshore capital investment for 2021 is expected to be between $200 million and $250 million. This capital spend includes a planned well in China as well as preservation capital for the West White Rose project. Production from our Offshore segment is expected to range between 66.0 thousand BOE per day and 74.0 thousand BOE per day.
In 2021, we plan to invest between $900 million and $1.1 billion in the U.S. Manufacturing, Canadian Manufacturing and Retail segments and will continue to focus on refining reliability and maintenance, safety projects and potentially high-return optimization opportunities. We also plan to invest between $520 million and $570 million for the Superior Refinery rebuild project. The rebuild project is expected to further enhance our heavy oil value chain integration while further reducing the Company’s exposure to WTI-WCS location differentials. Downstream throughput is expected to be in the range of 500.0 thousand barrels per day to 550.0 thousand barrels per day.
We expect to invest between $75 million and $100 million of corporate capital across the Company.
Our updated guidance dated July 28, 2021, is available on our website at cenovus.com.
12


COMMODITY PRICES UNDERLYING OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS
Key performance drivers for our financial results include commodity prices, quality and location price differentials, refining crack spreads as well as the U.S./Canadian dollar and Chinese Yuan (“RMB”)/Canadian dollar exchange rates. The following table shows selected market benchmark prices and the U.S./Canadian dollar and RMB/Canadian dollar average exchange rates to assist in understanding our financial results.
Selected Benchmark Prices and Exchange Rates (1)
Six months ended June 30,
(Average US$/bbl, unless otherwise indicated)2021Percent Change2020Q2 2021Q1 2021Q2 2020
Brent (2)
64.86 63 39.73 68.83 60.90 29.20 
WTI61.96 67 37.01 66.07 57.84 27.85 
Differential Brent-WTI2.90 7 2.72 2.76 3.06 1.35 
WCS at Hardisty ("WCS")49.98 138 21.01 54.58 45.37 16.38 
Differential WTI-WCS11.98 (25)16.00 11.49 12.47 11.47 
WCS (C$/bbl)
62.21 120 28.26 66.99 57.44 22.42 
WCS at Nederland59.48 85 32.18 63.03 55.93 22.55 
Differential WTI-WCS at Nederland2.48 (49)4.83 3.04 1.91 5.30 
Condensate (C5 @ Edmonton)62.22 81 34.29 66.40 58.04 22.30 
Differential WTI-Condensate (Premium)/Discount(0.26)(110)2.72 (0.33)(0.20)5.55 
Differential WCS-Condensate (Premium)/Discount(12.24)(8)(13.28)(11.82)(12.67)(5.92)
Average (C$/bbl)
77.50 68 46.21 81.51 73.49 30.70 
Synthetic @ Edmonton60.37 80 33.46 66.41 54.32 23.44 
WTI-Synthetic (Premium)/Discount Differential1.59 (55)3.55 (0.34)3.52 4.41 
Refined Product Prices
Chicago Regular Unleaded Gasoline ("RUL")78.27 84 42.45 87.03 69.51 32.91 
Chicago Ultra-low Sulphur Diesel ("ULSD")79.50 64 48.61 85.73 73.28 36.89 
Refining Margin: 3-2-1 Crack Spreads (3)
Chicago16.72 120 7.61 20.50 12.93 6.44 
Group 317.55 86 9.42 19.44 15.67 7.92 
Renewable Identification Numbers ("RINs")6.80 258 1.90 8.12 5.49 2.21 
Natural Gas Prices
AECO (4) (C$/Mcf)
2.89 42 2.03 2.85 2.92 1.91 
NYMEX (US$/Mcf)
2.76 51 1.83 2.83 2.69 1.72 
Foreign Exchange Rate
US$ per C$1 - Average0.802 9 0.733 0.814 0.790 0.722 
US$ per C$1 - End of Period0.807 10 0.734 0.807 0.795 0.734 
RMB per C$1 - Average5.190 1 5.156 5.259 5.120 5.118 
(1)These benchmark prices are not our realized sales prices and represent approximate values. For our average realized sales prices and realized risk management results, refer to the Netback tables in the Reportable Segments section of this MD&A.
(2)Calendar month average of settled prices for Dated Brent.
(3)The average 3-2-1 Crack Spread is an indicator of the refining margin and is valued on a last in, first out accounting basis.
(4)Alberta Energy Company (“AECO”) natural gas monthly index.
Crude Oil and Condensate Benchmarks
In the second quarter, Brent and WTI crude oil benchmarks improved due to rebounding global crude oil demand amid roll out efforts of COVID-19 vaccines, economic recovery and declines in crude oil inventories. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and a group of 10 non-OPEC members (collectively, "OPEC+") continued to support global prices despite the gradual easing of production quotas in the second quarter.
The price received for our Atlantic crude oil and Asia Pacific NGLs is primarily driven by the price of Brent.
WTI is an important benchmark for Canadian crude oil since it reflects inland North American crude oil prices and the Canadian dollar equivalent is the basis for determining royalty rates for a number of our crude oil properties. In the second quarter, the Brent-WTI differential remained narrow due to lower crude oil exports from North America and reduced U.S. crude oil supply. The differential was wider compared with the second quarter of 2020 when COVID-19 caused crude oil demand destruction and oversupply.
13


WCS is blended heavy oil which consists of both conventional heavy oil and unconventional diluted bitumen. In the second quarter, the average WTI-WCS differential narrowed slightly compared with the first quarter; and was consistent with the second quarter of 2020. Average differentials in the second quarter of 2021 were narrow due to supply reduction caused by planned maintenance of integrated oil sands mines; while narrow average differentials in the second quarter of 2020 were a function of volatility related to COVID-19.
WCS at Nederland is a heavy oil benchmark at the U.S. Gulf Coast (“USGC”) which is representative of pricing for our sales in the USGC. WCS at Nederland prices were strong in the second quarter of 2021, consistent with increasing crude oil prices globally, as refiners increased crude runs to adjust to increased demand for products. In the second quarter, WCS at Nederland benchmark prices relative to WTI narrowed compared with 2020, mainly attributed to strong coking demand and continued OPEC+ curtailment on supply of medium and heavy crude oil.
We upgrade heavy crude oil and bitumen into a sweet synthetic crude oil, the Husky Synthetic Blend ("HSB"), at the Lloydminster Upgrader. The price realized for HSB is primarily driven by the price of WTI and by the supply and demand of sweet synthetic crude oil from Western Canada, which influences the WTI-Synthetic differential.
image6a.jpg
Blending condensate with bitumen enables our production to be transported through pipelines. Our blending ratios, diluent volumes as a percentage of total blended volumes, range from approximately 23 percent to 31 percent. The WCS-Condensate differential is an important benchmark as a wider differential generally results in a decrease in the recovery of condensate costs when selling a barrel of blended crude oil. When the supply of condensate in Alberta does not meet the demand, Edmonton condensate prices may be driven by USGC condensate prices plus the cost to transport the condensate to Edmonton. Our blending costs are also impacted by the timing of purchases and deliveries of condensate into inventory to be available for use in blending as well as timing of sales of blended product.
Average Edmonton condensate benchmark prices were at a slight premium relative to WTI in the second quarter as a result of strong oil sands demand.
Refining Benchmarks
RUL and ULSD benchmark prices are representative of inland refined product prices and are used to derive the Chicago 3-2-1 market crack spread. The 3-2-1 market crack spread is an indicator of the refining margin generated by converting three barrels of crude oil into two barrels of regular unleaded gasoline and one barrel of ultra-low sulphur diesel using current month WTI-based crude oil feedstock prices and valued on a last in, first out accounting basis.
The Chicago 3-2-1 market crack spread reflects the market for our Toledo, Lima and Wood River refineries. The Group 3 3-2-1 market crack spread reflects the market for our Borger Refinery.
Average Chicago refined product prices increased in the second quarter, due to a combination of the higher cost of RINs as a result of a tight biofuel market and uncertainty around policies that drive RINs demand, as well as higher refined product demand due to the deployment of COVID-19 vaccines and increasing economic activity. Recovering refined product demand resulted in lower inventory levels which increased market crack spreads. As North American refining crack spreads are expressed on a WTI basis, while refined products are generally set by global prices, the strength of refining market crack spreads in the U.S. Midwest and Midcontinent will reflect the differential between Brent and WTI benchmark prices.
14


Our realized crack spreads are affected by many other factors such as the variety of crude oil feedstock, refinery configuration and product output, the time lag between the purchase and delivery of crude oil feedstock, and the cost of feedstock, which is valued on a first in, first out (“FIFO”) accounting basis.

image7a.jpg
(1)    RINs forward price information is unavailable at June 30, 2021.
Natural Gas Benchmarks
Average NYMEX natural gas prices increased compared with low prices in the second quarter of 2020 as lower associated gas production and a strong rebound in domestic demand and liquified natural gas exports supported the market. Average AECO prices improved alongside the NYMEX benchmark. The differential between AECO and NYMEX remained narrow as basin debottlenecking has allowed for ample access to domestic storage injections and lower pipeline utilization in the WCSB. The price received for our Asia Pacific natural gas production is largely based on long-term contracts.
Foreign Exchange Benchmarks
A substantial amount of our revenues are subject to foreign exchange exposure as the sales prices of our crude oil, NGLs, natural gas and refined products are determined by reference to U.S. benchmark prices. An increase in the value of the Canadian dollar compared with the U.S. dollar has a negative impact on our reported revenue. In addition to our revenues being denominated in U.S. dollars, a significant portion of our long-term debt is also U.S. dollar denominated. As the Canadian dollar weakens, our U.S. dollar debt gives rise to unrealized foreign exchange losses when translated to Canadian dollars. In addition, changes in foreign exchange rates impact the translation of U.S. and Asia Pacific operations.
The Canadian dollar on average strengthened relative to the U.S. dollar compared with 2020, resulting in a negative impact on our revenues. The strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar as at June 30, 2021, compared with December 31, 2020, resulted in unrealized foreign exchange gains of $280 million on the translation of our U.S. dollar debt.
A portion of our long-term sales contracts in Asia Pacific are priced in RMB. An increase in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the RMB will decrease the revenues received in Canadian dollars from the sale of natural gas commodities in the region.
REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
UPSTREAM
OIL SANDS
On December 31, 2020, the Oil Sands segment included the Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Narrows Lake assets as well as other projects in the early stages of development.
On January 1, 2021, as part of the Arrangement, we acquired:
Sunrise, a SAGD oil sands project located in the Athabasca region of northern Alberta. The Cenovus operated project is a 50 percent partnership with BP Canada.
Tucker, an oil sands project located 30 kilometres northwest of Cold Lake, Alberta.
15


Lloydminster thermal projects, consisting of bitumen production from 11 thermal plants, in the Lloydminster region of Saskatchewan.
Lloydminster Cold/EOR, which produces heavy oil from the Lloydminster region of Alberta and Saskatchewan.
A 35 percent interest in HMLP, which owns 2,200 kilometres of pipeline in the Lloydminster region and 5.9 million barrels of storage at Hardisty and Lloydminster. Financial results from HMLP are reported on an equity-accounted basis.
In the second quarter of 2021, we:
Delivered safe and reliable operations.
Completed scheduled maintenance turnarounds at Foster Creek and Sunrise.
Completed scheduled maintenance at several of our thermal plants at our LLoydminster thermal assets.
Increased production at our Lloydminster thermal assets compared with the first quarter of 2021.
Generated Operating Margin of $1,411 million, an increase of $1,281 million compared with the second quarter of 2020 primarily due to higher average realized sales prices and added volumes from assets acquired as part of the Arrangement, partially offset by higher transportation and blending costs.
Earned a Netback of $32.43 per BOE.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared With Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Financial Results
Three Months Ended
June 30,
($ millions)2021
2020 (1)
Gross Sales5,015 1,247 
Less: Royalties469 20 
Revenues4,546 1,227 
Expenses
Purchased Product574 166 
Transportation and Blending1,780 632 
Operating592 233 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management189 66 
Operating Margin1,411 130 
Unrealized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management (2)
374 121 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization627 395 
Exploration Expense2 
Share of (Income) Loss from Equity-Accounted Affiliates(5)— 
Segment Income (Loss)413 (390)
(1)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(2)Unrealized gain and loss on risk management is recorded in the reportable segment to which the derivative instrument relates. Comparative periods have been reclassified as these amounts were recorded in the Corporate and Eliminations segment prior to January 1, 2021.
Operating Margin Variance (1)
image8a.jpg
(1)Other includes third party sourced volumes, construction and other activities not attributable to the production of crude oil, NGLs or natural gas.
(2)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(3)Revenues include the value of condensate sold as heavy oil blend. Condensate costs are recorded in transportation and blending expense. The crude oil price excludes the impact of condensate purchases.
(4)Inventory write-downs prior to January 1, 2021, have been reclassified to royalties, purchased product, transportation and blending or operating expenses to conform with the current presentation of inventory write-downs.



16


Operating Results
Three Months Ended
June 30,
20212020
Total Sales Volumes (MBOE/d)
544.0 370.1 
Total Realized Price per Unit Sold ($/BOE)
61.19 12.64 
Crude Oil Production (Mbbls/d)
Foster Creek156.8 166.0 
Christina Lake230.5 207.2 
Sunrise (1)
22.4 — 
Lloydminster Thermal97.7 — 
Tucker21.2 — 
Lloydminster Cold/EOR20.8 — 
Total Daily Crude Oil Production
549.4 373.2 
Effective Royalty Rate (percent)
17.7 17.3 
Per Unit Transportation and Blending Cost ($/BOE)
7.37 8.56 
Per Unit Operating Cost ($/BOE)
11.91 7.36 
(1)Represents Cenovus’s 50 percent interest in Sunrise operations.
Revenues
Price
In the second quarter of 2021, our realized sales price was $61.19 per BOE compared with $12.64 per BOE in the second quarter of 2020. The increase in realized sales price was primarily due to higher WTI benchmark prices (US$66.07 per BOE compared with US$27.85 per BOE in the second quarter of 2020). Despite flat WTI-WCS differentials year-over-year, we further increased our realized sales price as we shipped and sold a higher percentage of our volumes to U.S. destinations.
In the second quarter of 2021, gross sales included $508 million (2020 – $182 million) from third-party sourced volumes which are not included in our per-unit pricing metrics or our Netbacks.
In the second quarter of 2021, gross sales included other amounts of $63 million (2020 – $1 million), which are not included in our per-unit pricing metrics or our Netbacks as it relates to construction, transportation and blending activities.
The heavy oil and bitumen produced by Cenovus must be blended with condensate to reduce its viscosity to transport it to market through pipelines. Our realized bitumen sales price does not include the sale of condensate; however, it is influenced by the price of condensate. As the cost of condensate increases relative to the price of blended crude oil, our realized heavy oil and bitumen sales price decreases. Up to three months may lapse from when we purchase condensate to when we sell our blended production.
Cenovus makes storage and transportation decisions using our marketing and transportation infrastructure, including storage and pipeline assets to optimize product mix, delivery points, transportation commitments and customer diversification. In order to price protect our inventories associated with the storage or transport decisions, Cenovus employs various price alignment and volatility management strategies, including through risk management contracts, to reduce volatility in future cash flows to improve cash flow stability while we are deleveraging our balance sheet. Transactions typically span across periods, as such, these transactions reside across both realized and unrealized risk management. As the financial contracts settle, they will flow from unrealized to realized risk management gains and losses.
In the second quarter of 2021, we incurred a realized risk management loss due to the settlement of benchmark prices relative to our risk management contract prices; the underlying physical inventory sold in the quarter recognized a gain due to rising benchmark prices. In the second quarter of 2021, unrealized losses were recorded on our crude oil financial instruments primarily due to forward benchmark pricing rising above our risk management contract prices that related to future periods and the realization of settled positions. In a rising commodity price environment, we would expect to realize losses on our risk management activities but recognize gains on the underlying physical inventory sold in the period and the opposite to occur in a falling commodity price environment.
Production Volumes
Oil Sands crude oil production was 549.4 thousand barrels per day in the second quarter of 2021 compared with 373.2 thousand barrels per day in the second quarter of 2020.
17


Production levels increased in year-over-year primarily due to 162.1 thousand barrels per day from assets acquired as part of the Arrangement. Lloydminster thermal production remains strong as we continue to apply our operating strategy and production and well delivery techniques. We had a planned maintenance turnaround at Sunrise during the quarter which impacted production. Tucker produced at stable rates.
Production at Foster Creek decreased 9.2 thousand barrels per day year-over-year due to a planned turnaround and operational outages in the second quarter of 2021, and the facility running at capacity in the second quarter of 2020.
Production at Christina Lake increased 23.3 thousand barrels per day year-over-year due to wells coming online in the second quarter of 2021 and our decision to operate at reduced levels in April 2020 in response to the low commodity price environment.
Royalties
Royalty calculations for our Oil Sands segment are based on government prescribed royalty regimes in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
Our Alberta oil sands royalty projects (Foster Creek, Christina Lake, Sunrise and Tucker) are based on government prescribed pre- and post-payout royalty rates which are determined on a sliding scale using the Canadian dollar equivalent WTI benchmark price.
Royalties for a pre-payout project are based on a monthly calculation that applies a royalty rate (ranging from one percent to nine percent, based on the Canadian dollar equivalent WTI benchmark price) to the gross revenues from the project.
Royalties for a post-payout project are based on an annualized calculation which uses the greater of: (1) the gross revenues multiplied by the applicable royalty rate (one percent to nine percent, based on the Canadian dollar equivalent WTI benchmark price); or (2) the net revenues of the project multiplied by the applicable royalty rate (25 percent to 40 percent, based on the Canadian dollar equivalent WTI benchmark price). Gross revenues are a function of sales revenues less diluent costs and transportation costs. Net revenues are a function of sales revenues less diluent costs, transportation costs, and allowed operating and capital costs.
Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Tucker are post-payout projects and Sunrise is a pre-payout project.
For our Saskatchewan properties, Lloydminster thermal and Lloydminster Cold/EOR, royalty calculations are based on an annual rate that is applied to each project, as well as each project's Crown and freehold split. For Crown royalties, the pre-payout calculation is based on a one percent rate and the post-payout calculation is based on a 20 percent rate. The freehold calculation is limited to post-payout projects and is based on an eight percent rate.
Effective royalty rates increased primarily due to higher realized pricing and higher Alberta oil sands sliding scale royalty rates, partially offset by lower rates on Saskatchewan production, all of which was acquired as part of the Arrangement.
Royalties increased by $449 million compared with the second quarter of 2020, mainly due to higher net revenue as a result of higher realized pricing, combined with increased production resulting from assets acquired under the Arrangement.
Expenses
Transportation and Blending
Blending costs increased $1,033 million compared with 2020. At Foster Creek and Christina Lake, blending costs increased due to higher condensate prices. In addition, the second quarter of 2020 reflects post-impairment blending costs after inventory impaired on March 31, 2020 was sold. Blending rates at Sunrise are comparable to Foster Creek and Christina Lake. The remaining assets at Tucker, Lloydminster thermal and Lloydminster Cold/EOR typically have lower blending rates due to lower crude oil density.
Transportation costs increased $115 million to $364 million in the second quarter of 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to assets acquired in the Arrangement, increased volumes shipped and sold to U.S. destinations via pipeline to obtain higher sales prices, partially offset by lower volumes shipped to U.S. destinations via rail.
Per-unit Transportation Expenses
Per-unit transportation costs were $7.37 per BOE in the second quarter (2020 – $8.56 per barrel). The decrease was mainly a result of our ability to optimize combined pipeline capacity out of Alberta following the Arrangement, allowing heavy oil production from Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Sunrise to be shipped and sold to U.S. destinations with less reliance on rail, and more volumes via pipeline. Also contributing to the decrease were low per-unit transportation costs at Tucker, Lloydminster thermal, and Lloydminster Cold/EOR, compared with Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Sunrise. The decrease was partially offset by increased volumes shipped and sold to U.S. destinations.
At Foster Creek, per-unit transportation costs increased eight percent from 2020 to $12.25 per barrel as we shipped 40 percent (2020 – 30 percent) of our volumes to U.S. destinations to obtain higher realized prices. The increase was partially offset by less
18


than five percent of our volumes shipped to U.S. destinations via rail compared with 25 percent in 2020, and a higher percentage of volumes via pipeline.
At Christina Lake, per-unit transportation cost were $6.10 per barrel (2020 – $6.19 per barrel) as we shipped lower volumes to the USGC.
Operating
Primary drivers of our operating expenses in the second quarter of 2021 were fuel, workforce, chemical costs, repairs and maintenance, and workovers. Total operating costs increased primarily due to assets acquired from the Arrangement which have higher per barrel operating costs and planned turnarounds at Foster Creek and Sunrise in 2021.
Three Months Ended June 30,
($/bbl)2021Percent
Change
2020
Foster Creek
Fuel
3.95 57 2.51 
Non-Fuel
8.23 41 5.82 
Total
12.18 46 8.33 
Christina Lake
Fuel
3.06 54 1.99 
Non-Fuel
4.89 8 4.53 
Total
7.95 22 6.52 
Other Oil Sands (1)
Fuel
3.92  — 
Non-Fuel
13.29  — 
Total
17.21  — 
Total11.91 62 7.36 
(1)Includes Sunrise, Tucker, Lloydminster thermal and Lloydminster Cold/EOR assets.
At both Foster Creek and Christina Lake, per-BOE fuel costs increased primarily due to higher natural gas prices. Non-fuel costs increased at Foster Creek primarily due to the planned turnaround in the second quarter of 2021. Non-fuel costs increased at Christina Lake primarily due to higher chemical costs. In addition, we had reduced repairs and maintenance activity at Foster Creek and Christina Lake in the second quarter of 2020 due to COVID-19 safety measures.
Total unit operating costs for all assets increased $4.55 per BOE to $11.91 per BOE in the second quarter of 2021 compared with the same period of 2020. The increase was due to higher per-unit operating costs of the assets acquired in the Arrangement, increased Foster Creek and Christina Lake per-unit costs as discussed above, and the planned maintenance turnaround at Sunrise during the second quarter of 2021.
Netbacks (1) (2)
Netback is a non-GAAP measure commonly used in the oil and gas industry to assist in measuring operating performance on a per-unit basis. Our Netback calculation is aligned with the definition found in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook. Netbacks reflect our margin on a per-barrel of oil equivalent basis. Netback is defined as gross sales less royalties, transportation and blending and operating expenses divided by sales volumes. Netbacks do not reflect non-cash write-downs or reversals of product inventory until it is realized when the product is sold. The sales price, transportation and blending costs, and sales volumes exclude the impact of purchased condensate. Condensate is blended with the heavy oil to transport it to market. For a reconciliation of our Netbacks see the Advisory section of this MD&A.
Three Months Ended
June 30,
($/BOE)20212020
Sales Price61.19 12.64 
Royalties (1)
9.48 0.80 
Transportation and Blending (1) (2)
7.37 8.56 
Operating Expenses (1)
11.91 7.36 
Netback 32.43 (4.08)
(1)Netbacks do not reflect non-cash write-downs of product inventory or reversals of product inventory until realized when the product is sold.
(2)Netbacks reflect our margin on a per-barrel basis of unblended crude oil.
19


Our average Netback increased in the second quarter of 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to higher realized sales prices, partially offset by higher royalties and operating costs.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared With Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Financial Results
Six Months Ended
June 30,
($ millions)2021
2020 (1)
Gross Sales9,790 3,681 
Less: Royalties793 71 
Revenues8,997 3,610 
Expenses
Purchased Product1,292 571 
Transportation and Blending3,558 2,537 
Operating1,177 553 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management418 91 
Operating Margin2,552 (142)
Unrealized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management (2)
233 143 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization1,239 806 
Exploration Expense13 
Share of (Income) Loss from Equity-Accounted Affiliates(5)— 
Segment Income (Loss)1,072 (1,098)
(1)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(2)Unrealized gain and loss on risk management is recorded in the reportable segment to which the derivative instrument relates. Comparative periods have been reclassified as these amounts were recorded in the Corporate and Eliminations segment prior to January 1, 2021.
Operating Margin Variance (1)
image9a.jpg
(1)Other includes third party sourced volumes, construction and other activities not attributable to the production of crude oil, NGLs or natural gas.
(2)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(3)Revenues include the value of condensate sold as heavy oil blend. Condensate costs are recorded in transportation and blending expense. The crude oil price excludes the impact of condensate purchases.
(4)Inventory write-downs prior to January 1, 2021, have been reclassified to royalties, purchased product, transportation and blending or operating expenses to conform with the current presentation of inventory write-downs.
20


Operating Results
Six Months Ended
June 30,
20212020
Total Sales Volumes (MBOE/d)
554.6 384.0 
Total Realized Price per Unit Sold ($/BOE)
56.71 17.67 
Crude Oil Production (Mbbls/d)
Foster Creek159.9 164.9 
Christina Lake226.7 215.2 
Sunrise (1)
25.1 — 
Lloydminster Thermal96.9 — 
Tucker22.2 — 
Lloydminster Cold/EOR20.7 — 
Total Daily Crude Oil Production
551.5 380.1 
Effective Royalty Rate (percent)
16.2 12.4 
Per Unit Transportation and Blending Cost ($/BOE)
7.71 9.73 
Per Unit Operating Cost ($/BOE)
11.65 7.56 
(1)Represents Cenovus’s 50 percent interest in Sunrise operations.
Revenues
Price
In the six months ended June 30, 2021, our realized sales price was $56.71 per BOE compared with $17.67 per BOE in the first half of 2020. The increase in realized sales price was primarily due to higher WTI benchmark prices and narrower WTI-WCS differentials.
In the first half of 2021, gross sales included $1,180 million (2020 – $587 million) from third-party sourced volumes which are not included in our per-unit pricing metrics or our Netbacks.
In the first half of 2021, gross sales included other amounts of $133 million (2020 – $7 million), which are not included in our per-unit pricing metrics or our Netbacks as it relates to transportation, blending and construction activities.
In the six months ended June 30, 2021, we incurred a realized risk management loss due to the settlement of benchmark prices relative to our risk management contract prices; the underlying physical inventory sold in the first half of the year recognized a gain due to rising benchmark prices. In the first six months of 2021, unrealized losses were recorded on our crude oil financial instruments primarily due to forward benchmark pricing rising above our risk management contract prices that related to future periods and the realization of settled positions.
Production Volumes
Oil Sands crude oil production was 551.5 thousand barrels per day in the first half of 2021 compared with 380.1 thousand barrels per day in 2020. Production levels increased primarily due to the addition of 164.9 thousand barrels per day from assets acquired as part of the Arrangement. Lloydminster thermal achieved record single day production rates and continued to produce at high rates through the end of the second quarter. We had a planned maintenance turnaround at Sunrise in the second quarter which impacted production. Tucker produced at stable rates.
Production at Foster Creek decreased 5.0 thousand barrels per day year-over-year due to a planned turnaround and operational outages in the second quarter of 2021, and the facility running at capacity in the second quarter of 2020.
Production at Christina Lake increased 11.5 thousand barrels per day year-over-year due to wells coming online in the second quarter of 2021 and our decision to operate at reduced levels in April 2020.
Royalties
Effective royalty rates increased primarily due to higher realized pricing and higher Alberta oil sands sliding scale royalty rates, partially offset by lower rates on Saskatchewan production, all of which was acquired as part of the Arrangement.
Royalties increased by $722 million compared with 2020, mainly due to higher revenue as a result of higher realized pricing, combined with increased production resulting from assets acquired under the Arrangement.

21


Expenses
Transportation and Blending
Blending costs increased $927 million compared with 2020. At Foster Creek and Christina Lake, blending costs increased from 2020 due to higher condensate prices.
Transportation costs increased $94 million to $774 million in the first half of 2021, primarily due to assets acquired in the Arrangement, increased volumes shipped and sold to U.S. destinations via pipeline to obtain higher sales prices, partially offset by lower volumes shipped to U.S. destinations via rail.
Per-unit Transportation Expenses
Per-unit transportation costs were $7.71 per BOE in the first half of 2021 (2020 – $9.73 per BOE). The decrease was mainly a result of heavy oil production from Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Sunrise shipped and sold to U.S. destinations with less reliance on rail. Also contributing to the decrease were low per-unit transportation costs at Tucker, Lloydminster thermal, and Lloydminster Cold/EOR, at Tucker, Lloydminster thermal, and Lloydminster Cold/EOR, compared with Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Sunrise.
At Foster Creek, per-unit transportation costs decreased 10 percent from 2020 to $11.55 per barrel as we shipped 25 percent (2020 – 50 percent) of our volumes to U.S. destinations via rail, and a higher percentage of volumes via pipeline.
At Christina Lake, per-unit transportation costs decreased 12 percent from 2020 to $6.36 per barrel as we shipped less than five percent (2020 – 30 percent) of our volumes to U.S. destinations via rail, and a higher percentage of volumes via pipeline.
Operating
Primary drivers of our operating expenses in the first six months of 2021 were fuel, workforce, chemical costs, repairs and maintenance, and workovers. Total operating costs increased primarily due to assets acquired from the Arrangement which have higher per barrel operating costs, and increased fuel costs due to higher natural gas prices, combined with the planned turnarounds at Foster Creek and Sunrise in the second quarter of 2021.
Six Months Ended June 30,
($/BOE)2021Percent
Change
2020
Foster Creek
Fuel
3.77 45 2.60 
Non-Fuel
7.60 23 6.20 
Total
11.37 29 8.80 
Christina Lake
Fuel
3.06 51 2.03 
Non-Fuel
5.09 12 4.54 
Total
8.15 24 6.57 
Other Oil Sands (1)
Fuel
4.16  — 
Non-Fuel
12.36  — 
Total
16.52  — 
Total11.65 54 7.56 
(1)Includes Sunrise, Tucker, Lloydminster Thermal and Lloydminster Cold/EOR assets.
At both Foster Creek and Christina Lake, per-BOE fuel costs increased primarily due to higher natural gas prices. Non-fuel costs increased at Foster Creek primarily due to the planned turnaround in the second quarter of 2021. Non-fuel costs increased at Christina Lake primarily due to higher chemical costs. In addition, we had reduced repairs and maintenance activity at Foster Creek and Christina Lake in the second quarter of 2020 due to COVID-19 safety measures.
Total unit operating costs for all assets increased $4.09 per BOE to $11.65 per barrel in the first half of 2021 compared with the same period of 2020. The increase was due to higher per-unit operating costs of the assets acquired in the Arrangement, increased Foster Creek and Christina Lake per-unit costs as discussed above, and the planned maintenance turnaround at Sunrise during the second quarter of 2021.
DD&A
We deplete crude oil and natural gas properties on a unit-of-production basis over total proved reserves. The unit-of-production rate accounts for expenditures incurred to date, together with estimated future development expenditures required to develop those proved reserves. This rate, calculated at an area level, is then applied to our sales volume to determine DD&A
22


each period. We believe that this method of calculating DD&A charges each barrel of crude oil equivalent sold with its proportionate share of the cost of capital invested over the total estimated life of the related asset as represented by proved reserves.
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, DD&A increased $232 million and $433 million, respectively, compared with the same period in 2020 as a result of the Arrangement. The average depletion rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 was $11.55 per BOE and $11.34 per BOE, respectively (2020 – $10.45 per BOE and $10.43 per BOE, respectively).
We depreciate our ROU assets on a straight-line or unit of production basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the lease term.
Netbacks (1) (2)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
($/bbl)20212020
Sales Price56.71 17.67 
Royalties (1)
7.90 1.01 
Transportation and Blending (1) (2)
7.71 9.73 
Operating Expenses (1)
11.65 7.56 
Netback 29.45 (0.63)
(1)Netbacks do not reflect non-cash write-downs of product inventory or reversals of product inventory until realized when the product is sold.
(2)Netbacks reflect our margin on a per-barrel basis of unblended crude oil.
Our average Netback increased in the first six months of 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to higher realized sales prices and lower transportation costs as a result of lower crude-by-rail volumes, partially offset by higher royalties and operating costs.
CONVENTIONAL
On December 31, 2020, the Conventional segment included assets primarily in the Elmworth-Wapiti, Kaybob-Edson, and Clearwater operating areas, rich in natural gas, and NGLs. The assets are in Alberta and British Columbia and include interests in numerous natural gas processing facilities.
On January 1, 2021, as part of the Arrangement, we acquired assets primarily in the same areas mentioned above, and the Rainbow Lake operating area located approximately 900 kilometres northwest of Edmonton. The acquired assets include interests in several natural gas processing facilities.
In the second quarter of 2021, we:
Delivered safe and reliable operations.
Generated Operating Margin of $142 million, an increase of $110 million compared with the second quarter of 2020 due to higher average realized sales prices, and increased volumes from assets acquired as part of the Arrangement, partially offset by higher per-unit operating expenses from assets acquired as part of the Arrangement.
Sold our GORR interest in Marten Hills for gross cash proceeds of $102 million.
Completed numerous turnarounds involving field maintenance activities and safely shutting-in and reactivating production.
Achieved a Netback of $10.00 per BOE.
We entered into two separate definitive agreements in June and July to sell assets within our Conventional segment located in the East Clearwater area and Kaybob areas for combined gross proceeds of approximately $110 million. The Kaybob transaction closed in July and the East Clearwater transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021.











23


Financial Results
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
($ millions)2021
2020 (1)
2021
2020 (1)
Gross Sales626 182 1,402 404 
Less: Royalties39 63 
Revenues587 181 1,339 400 
Expenses
Purchased Product287 47 668 108 
Transportation and Blending (2)
19 19 37 42 
Operating140 83 282 167 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management(1)—  — 
Operating Margin142 32 352 83 
Unrealized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management (3)
2 — 1 — 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization102 80 210 488 
Exploration Expense1 — (3)— 
Segment Income (Loss)37 (48)144 (405)
(1)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(2)Netbacks do not reflect non-cash write-downs of product inventory or reversals of product inventory until realized when the product is sold.
(3)Unrealized gain and loss on risk management is recorded in the reportable segment to which the derivative instrument relates. Comparative periods have been reclassified as these amounts were recorded in the Corporate and Eliminations segment prior to January 1, 2021.
Revenues
The three and six months ended June 30, 2021, included gross sales of $287 million and $668 million, respectively (2020 –$49 million and $110 million, respectively) relating to third-party sourced volumes, which are not included in our per-unit pricing metrics or our Netbacks.
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, revenues included other amounts of $19 million and $43 million, respectively (2020 – $12 million and $23 million, respectively), which are not included in our per-unit pricing metrics or our Netbacks, as it relates to processing and transportation activities for third parties.
Operating Results
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2021202020212020
Total Sales Volumes (MBOE/d)
141.3 92.0 138.6 93.8 
Crude Oil (Mbbls/d)
9.2 6.3 8.9 7.5 
NGLS (Mbbls/d)
29.0 20.3 28.6 20.7 
Natural Gas (MMcf/d)
618.4 392.2 606.5 393.5 
Natural Gas Production (percentage of total)
73 71 73 70 
Crude Oil and NGLs Production (percentage of total)
27 29 27 30 
Total Realized Price per Unit Sold ($/BOE)
24.90 14.48 27.54 15.88 
Crude Oil ($/bbl)
67.91 23.78 64.86 33.47 
NGLS ($/bbl)
35.48 18.75 36.73 19.77 
Natural Gas ($/mcf)
3.02 2.04 3.61 2.11 
Effective Royalty Rate (percent)
12.7 0.9 9.5 1.8 
Per Unit Transportation Cost ($/BOE)
1.51 2.38 1.49 2.46 
Per Unit Operating Cost ($/BOE)
10.41 9.05 10.65 9.03 
Revenues
Price
Our total realized sales price was $24.90 per BOE and $27.54 per BOE in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively (2020 – $14.48 per BOE and $15.88 per BOE, respectively) primarily due to higher crude oil and natural gas benchmark prices.
24


Production Volumes
Production volumes increased in the first half of 2021 primarily due to 51.7 thousand BOE per day from assets acquired as part of the Arrangement. In addition, we brought 12 new net wells on production during the six months ended June 30, 2021. The increase is partially offset by natural declines.
Royalties
The Conventional assets are subject to royalty regimes in both Alberta and British Columbia. 
Effective royalty rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, increased primarily due to higher realized prices and lower gas cost allowance credits.
Royalties increased $38 million and $59 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2020. The increase is primarily due to higher realized prices combined with increased production resulting from assets acquired as part of the Arrangement.
Expenses
Transportation
Our transportation costs reflect charges for the movement of crude oil, NGLs and natural gas from the point of production to where the product is sold. Per-unit transportation costs averaged $1.51 per BOE and $1.49 per BOE in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively (2020 – $2.38 per BOE and $2.46 per BOE, respectively). The decrease is due to lower pipeline contract rates and higher sales volumes compared with the first half of 2020.
Transportation costs decreased by $nil and $5 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2020. The decrease is primarily due to lower pipeline contract rates, partially offset by higher sales volumes.
Operating
Primary drivers of our operating expenses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, were workforce, repairs and maintenance, property tax and lease costs, and electricity. Total operating costs increased $57 million and $115 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, primarily due to the assets acquired in the Arrangement.
Operating costs increased $1.36 per BOE and $1.62 per BOE in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2020. The increase is primarily due to higher average operating costs on assets acquired as part of the Arrangement. Per-unit operating costs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, excluding assets acquired in the Arrangement, increased marginally year-over-year.
DD&A
We deplete crude oil and natural gas properties on a unit-of-production basis over total proved reserves. The unit-of-production rate accounts for expenditures incurred to date, together with estimated future development expenditures required to develop those proved reserves. This rate, calculated at an area level, is then applied to our sales volume to determine DD&A each period. We believe that this method of calculating DD&A charges each barrel of crude oil equivalent sold with its proportionate share of the cost of capital invested over total estimated life of the related asset as represented by proved reserves. The average depletion rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, was $7.93 per BOE and $8.28 per BOE, respectively (2020 – $9.50 per BOE and $10.20 per BOE, respectively).
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, total Conventional DD&A was $102 million and $210 million, respectively (2020 – $80 million and $488 million, respectively). The increase during the quarter was due to assets acquired in the Arrangement, partially offset by a lower depletable base as a result of impairment write-downs during the year ended December 31, 2020.
On a year-to-date basis the decrease was due to an impairment write-down of $315 million in the first quarter of 2020; and a lower depletable base as a result of further impairment write-downs during the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease is partially offset by assets acquired in the Arrangement.
25


Netbacks
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
($/BOE)2021202020212020
Sales Price24.90 14.48 27.54 15.88 
Royalties2.98 0.12 2.50 0.24 
Transportation and Blending1.51 2.38 1.49 2.46 
Operating Expenses10.41 9.05 10.65 9.03 
Netback 10.00 2.93 12.90 4.15 
Our average Netback increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, compared with 2020, primarily due to higher realized sales prices and lower transportation and blending costs, partially offset by higher royalties and operating costs.
OFFSHORE
The Offshore segment was acquired as part of the Arrangement and includes offshore operations, exploration and development activities in offshore China, the equity-accounted investment in the HCML joint venture in Indonesia and offshore operations, exploration and development off the east coast of Canada.
In the second quarter of 2021, we:
Delivered safe and reliable operations.
Generated Operating Margin of $340 million.
Achieved a Netback of $57.06 per BOE.
Offshore Consolidated
Financial Results
($ millions)Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Gross Sales427 858 
Less: Royalties25 50 
Revenues402 808 
Expenses
Transportation and Blending3 7 
Operating59 117 
Operating Margin340 684 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization117 242 
Exploration Expense1  
Share of (Income) Loss from Equity-Accounted Affiliates(12)(24)
Segment Income (Loss)234 466 
DD&A
In the Offshore segment, we deplete crude oil and natural gas properties using the unit-of-production method based on estimated proved developed producing reserves or proved plus probable reserves determined using forward prices and costs. This rate, calculated at an area level, is then applied to our sales volume to determine DD&A each period. We believe that this method of calculating DD&A charges each barrel of crude oil equivalent sold with its proportionate share of the cost of capital invested over total estimated life of the related asset as represented by proved developed producing or proved plus probable reserves. The average depletion rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, was $25.14 per BOE and $25.57 per BOE, respectively.
We depreciate our ROU assets on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the lease term.

26


Netbacks
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
($/BOE)China
Indonesia (1)
AtlanticTotal
Sales Price 69.04 61.79 86.07 71.70 
Royalties3.71 5.81 6.56 4.56 
Transportation and Blending  2.10 0.44 
Operating Expenses4.96 8.87 25.24 9.64 
Netback60.37 47.11 52.17 57.06 
Total Sales Volumes (MBOE/d)
49.0 8.8 15.2 73.0 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
($/BOE)China
Indonesia(1)
AtlanticTotal
Sales Price69.25 61.22 83.75 71.20 
Royalties3.71 7.07 6.13 4.61 
Transportation and Blending  2.46 0.50 
Operating Expenses4.83 8.17 25.89 9.50 
Netback60.71 45.98 49.27 56.59 
Total Sales Volumes (MBOE/d)
50.2 9.1 15.1 74.4 
(1)    Reported sales volumes, associated per unit values and royalty rates reflect Cenovus’s 40 percent interest in the Madura-BD gas project. Revenues and expenses related to the HCML joint venture are accounted for using the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes.
Revenues
Asia Pacific
In China, the Liwan gas project includes working interests of 49 percent in natural gas developments at the Liwan 3-1 and Liuhua 34-2 producing fields and 75 percent in the Liuhua 29-1 producing field. We also have petroleum contracts in Blocks 15/33, 16/25 and 23/07 which are in the exploration phase. We expect to drill an exploration well in Block 15/33 in the South China Sea before the end of this year. Block 15/33 contains an existing discovery that was drilled in 2018. We also plan to drill an exploration commitment well in Block 23/07 pending partner approval of location and timing.
We hold 40 percent joint control in HCML, which is a joint venture company that is accounted for using the equity method. HCML is engaged in the exploration for and production of crude oil and natural gas resources offshore Indonesia including the Madura Strait production sharing contract licence area. This licence area includes the operating BD field, and ongoing developments at the MDA, MBH and MDK fields. A final investment decision was made by HCML for development of the MAC field with production expected by mid-2023.
We also hold exploration rights in a block located southwest of the island of Taiwan in the South China Sea.
Financial Results
($ millions)Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Gross Sales308 629 
Less: Royalties16 33 
Revenues292 596 
Expenses
Operating24 46 
Operating Margin268 550 






27


Operating Results
Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Total Sales Volumes (1)(2)(3) (MBOE/d)
57.8 59.3 
NGLs (1)(2)(3) (Mbbls/d)
12.1 12.5 
Natural Gas (1)(2)(3) (MMcf/d)
274.1 280.7 
Total Realized Price per Unit Sold (3) ($/BOE)
67.93 68.01 
NGLs (3) ($/bbl)
72.55 71.07 
Natural Gas (3) ($/Mcf)
11.12 11.20 
Effective Royalty Rate (3) (percent)
5.9 6.2 
Per Unit Operating Cost (3) ($/BOE)
5.56 5.35 
(1)Sales volumes approximates total daily production.
(2)Reported sales volumes include Cenovus’s working interest from the Liwan gas project.
(3)    Reported sales volumes, associated per unit values and royalty rates reflect Cenovus’s 40 percent interest in the Madura-BD gas project. Revenues and expenses related to the HCML joint venture are accounted for using the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes.
Revenues
Price
The price we receive for natural gas is set under long-term contracts. The price we receive for NGLs is primarily driven by the price of Brent.
Production Volumes
Asia Pacific operations performed well. We produced 57.8 thousand BOE per day in the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 59.3 thousand BOE per day in the six months ended June 30, 2021. In the second quarter, production declined marginally compared with the first quarter due to planned maintenance in both China and Indonesia.
Royalties
Royalty rates are governed by production sharing contracts in which production is shared with the Chinese and Indonesian governments. 
Expenses
Operating
Primary drivers of our operating expenses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, were repairs and maintenance, insurance, and workforce.
Atlantic
Our Atlantic exploration and development program is focused in the Jeanne d’Arc Basin and the Flemish Pass located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador. The Jeanne d’Arc Basin contains the Hibernia, Terra Nova and Hebron fields, as well as the White Rose field and satellite extensions, including North Amethyst, West White Rose and South White Rose. In the Flemish Pass Basin, we hold a 35 percent non-operated working interest in each of the Bay du Nord, Bay de Verde, Baccalieu, Harpoon and Mizzen discoveries. We are the operator of the White Rose field and satellite extensions and hold an ownership interest in the Terra Nova field, as well as several smaller undeveloped fields. We also hold exploration acreage offshore Newfoundland and Labrador.
Our production in the first six months of 2021 is from the White Rose field and satellite extensions.
Production operations at the Terra Nova field have been suspended since December 2019. In the second quarter, the operator and partners reached an agreement in principle to restructure the project ownership and provide short-term funding towards continuing the Asset Life Extension ("ALE") Project for the Terra Nova floating production storage and offloading unit, which is being preserved quayside. An ALE sanction decision is anticipated in the second half of 2021.
The West White Rose Project remains deferred for 2021 while we continue to evaluate options with our partners.


28


Financial Results
($ millions)Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Gross Sales119 229 
Less: Royalties9 17 
Revenues110 212 
Expenses
Transportation3 7 
Operating35 71 
Operating Margin72 134 
Operating Results
Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Total Sales Volumes
Light Oil (Mbbls/d)
15.2 15.1 
Total Realized Price per Unit Sold ($/bbl)
Light Oil ($/bbl)
86.07 83.75 
Total Daily Production
Light Oil (Mbbls/d)
15.2 16.1 
Effective Royalty Rate (percent)
7.6 7.3 
Per Unit Operating Cost ($/bbl)
25.24 25.89 
Revenues
Price
The price we receive for light oil is primarily driven by the price of Brent.
Production and Sales Volumes
Atlantic operations performed well. We produced 15.2 thousand barrels per day and 16.1 thousand barrels per day in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively.
Light oil from production at the White Rose field is offloaded from the SeaRose floating production storage and offloading unit (“SeaRose FPSO”) to tankers and stored at an onshore terminal before shipment to buyers. The result is a timing difference between production and sales. Our sales volumes were 15.2 thousand barrels per day and 15.1 thousand barrels per day in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively.
Royalties
Royalties at the White Rose field are based on an agreement between our working interest partners and the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. We currently pay a basic royalty of 7.5 percent of gross sales at the White Rose field and five percent of gross sales at the satellite extensions.
Expenses
Operating
Primary drivers of our operating expenses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, were repairs and maintenance, workforce, vessel costs, and helicopter costs.
Transportation
Transportation includes the cost of transporting oil from the SeaRose FPSO to onshore via tankers, as well as storage costs.


29


DOWNSTREAM
CANADIAN MANUFACTURING
On December 31, 2020, Canadian Manufacturing operations included the Bruderheim crude-by-rail terminal.
On January 1, 2021, as part of the Arrangement, we acquired:
The Lloydminster Upgrader which is designed to process blended heavy crude oil feedstock, creating high quality, low-sulphur synthetic crude oil and ultra-low sulphur diesel. The Lloydminster Upgrader has crude oil throughput capacity of 81.5 thousand barrels per day.
The Lloydminster Refinery, which processes heavy crude oil and bitumen into asphalt products used in road construction and maintenance. The refinery also produces straight run gasoline, bulk distillates and industrial products. The Lloydminster Refinery has crude oil throughput capacity of 29.0 thousand barrels per day.
Two ethanol plants in Lloydminster, Saskatchewan and Minnedosa, Manitoba.
The Lloydminster Upgrader has the option to source crude oil feedstock from our Lloydminster thermal and Tucker production. The Lloydminster Refinery sources crude oil feedstock from our Lloydminster thermal production.
In the second quarter of 2021 we:
Delivered safe and reliable operations.
Achieved an average combined crude utilization of 94 percent at the Lloydminster Upgrader and Lloydminster Refinery.
Generated Operating Margin of $189 million, an increase of $183 million compared with 2020 due to assets acquired in the Arrangement, combined with a customer settlement of a take-or-pay contract for revenue of approximately $55 million related to Bruderheim crude-by-rail terminal operations.
Financial Results
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Month Ended June 30,
($ millions)2021202020212020
Revenues1,088 16 1,894 43 
Purchased Product807 — 1,438 — 
Gross Margin281 16 456 43 
Expenses
Operating92 10 185 21 
Operating Margin189 271 22 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization43 86 
Segment Income (Loss)146 185 18 
30


Operating Results
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2021202020212020
Crude Oil Throughput Capacity (Mbbls/d)
110.5 — 110.5 — 
Lloydminster Upgrader (Mbbls/d)
81.5 — 81.5 — 
Lloydminster Refinery (Mbbls/d)
29.0 — 29.0 — 
Crude Oil Throughput (Mbbls/d)
103.5 — 104.8 — 
Lloydminster Upgrader (Mbbls/d)
76.1 — 77.2 — 
Lloydminster Refinery (Mbbls/d)
27.4 — 27.6 — 
Crude Utilization (percent) (1)
94 — 95 — 
Refined Products Output (Mbbls/d)
105 — 106 — 
Upgrading Differential (2)
16.53 — 15.22 — 
Refining Margin ($/bbl) (1)
29.78 — 24.05 — 
Operating Expense ($/bbl) (1)
9.89 — 9.79 — 
Crude-by-Rail Operations
Volumes Loaded (3) (Mbbls/d)
3.1 5.7 12.3 50.9 
Ethanol Production (thousands of litres/d)
649.0 — 523.5 — 
(1)Based on crude throughput volumes and results of operations at the Lloydminster Upgrader and Refinery.
(2)Based on benchmark price differentials between heavy oil feedstock and synthetic crude.
(3)Volumes loaded and transported outside of Alberta.
Gross Margin
Upgrading operations process heavy crude oil into high value synthetic crude oil and low sulphur distillates. Upgrading profitability is primarily dependent on the differential between the sales price of synthetic crude oil and diesel, and the cost of heavy crude oil feedstock.
Lloydminster Refinery operations process heavy crude oil into asphalt and industrial products. The gross margin is primarily dependent on asphalt market prices and the cost of heavy crude oil feedstock.
Sales at the Lloydminster Refinery increase during paving season, which typically runs from May through October each year. Gross margin at the Lloydminster Refinery increased compared with the first quarter due to the commencement of paving season.
In the second quarter, gross margin at the Lloydminster Upgrader decreased slightly compared with the first quarter due to lower throughput, partially offset by a higher upgrading differential.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, revenue includes approximately $55 million for a customer settlement of a take-or-pay contract related to Bruderheim crude-by-rail terminal operations.
Operating Expense
Primary drivers of operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, were workforce, repairs and maintenance, and energy costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, unit operating expenses were $9.89 per barrel of crude throughput and $9.79 per barrel of crude throughput, respectively.
DD&A
Canadian Manufacturing assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service life of each component of the facilities, which range from three to 60 years. The service lives of these assets are reviewed on an annual basis. ROU assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, Canadian Manufacturing DD&A was $43 million and $86 million, respectively (2020 – $2 million and $4 million, respectively) as a result of assets acquired as part of the Arrangement.
U.S. MANUFACTURING
On December 31, 2020, U.S. Manufacturing operations included the Wood River and Borger refineries jointly owned with operator Phillips 66. We have a 50 percent interest in each refinery.
31


On January 1, 2021, as part of the Arrangement, we acquired:
The Lima Refinery, which we own 100 percent, is located in Lima, Ohio. The refinery produces low sulphur gasoline, gasoline blend stocks, ultra-low sulphur diesel, aviation fuel, petrochemical feedstock and other by-products.
The Toledo Refinery, of which our interest is 50 percent, is located near Toledo, Ohio. The refinery is jointly owned with operator BP. Products from the refinery include low sulphur gasoline, ultra-low sulphur diesel, aviation fuel, and other by-products.
The Superior Refinery, of which we own 100 percent, is located in Superior, Wisconsin. On April 26, 2018, the refinery experienced an incident while preparing for a major turnaround and was taken out of operation. The refinery is being rebuilt and is expected to restart around the first quarter of 2023.
In the second quarter of 2021, we:
Delivered safe and reliable operations.
Increased throughput in response to rebounding global demand, averaging 87 percent crude utilization.
Were impacted by temporary planned and unplanned outages at the Wood River, Borger, and Lima refineries, negatively affecting throughput.
Completed planned maintenance turnarounds at the Wood River and Borger refineries.
Financial Results
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
($ millions)2021
2020 (1)
2021
2020 (1)
Revenues4,729 841 8,166 2,396 
Purchased Product4,229 549 7,149 2,280 
Gross Margin500 292 1,017 116 
Expenses
Operating394 176 799 385 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management10 (7)31 (8)
Operating Margin96 123 187 (261)
Unrealized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management (2)
23 33 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization103 71 217 148 
Segment Income (Loss)(30)50 (63)(411)
(1)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(2)Unrealized gain and loss on risk management are recorded in the reportable segment to which the derivative instrument relates to. Comparative periods have been reclassified as these amounts were recorded in the Corporate and Eliminations segment prior to January 1, 2021.
Select Operating Results
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2021202020212020
Crude Oil Throughput Capacity (Mbbls/d)
502.5 247.5 502.5 247.5 
Wood River and Borger Refineries (1)
247.5 247.5 247.5 247.5 
Lima Refinery175.0 — 175.0 — 
Toledo Refinery (1)
80.0 — 80.0 — 
Crude Oil Throughput (Mbbls/d)
435.5 162.3 399.4 191.7 
     Wood River and Borger Refineries (1)
208.9 162.3 189.6 191.7 
Lima Refinery160.9 — 142.9 — 
Toledo Refinery (1)
65.7 — 66.9 — 
Throughput by Product (Mbbls/d)
Heavy Crude Oil136.7 55.8 127.5 77.1 
Light/Medium298.8 106.5 271.9 114.6 
Crude Utilization (percent)
87 66 79 78 
Refining Margin (2) ($/bbl)
12.59 19.77 14.06 3.33 
Operating Expense (2) ($/bbl)
9.96 11.91 11.06 11.04 
(1)    Represents Cenovus’s 50 percent interest in Wood River, Borger and Toledo refinery operations.
(2)    Based on crude oil throughput volumes and operating results at Wood River, Borger, Lima and Toledo refineries.
32


All refineries continue to optimize throughput as market conditions dictate. Throughput ran at reduced rates early in the first quarter due to low market crack spreads and in the second quarter due to planned and unplanned outages.
At the Wood River and Borger refineries, throughput was impacted by planned maintenance turnarounds that began in the first quarter. The turnaround at Borger was completed in early April and the turnaround at Wood River was completed in mid-May. Throughput at the Wood River and Borger refineries were further impacted, temporarily, by unplanned outages during the second quarter. In addition, the Wood River refinery implemented crude rate reductions in line with market demand.
At the Lima Refinery, we had a temporary unplanned outage in the first quarter of 2021 due to an incident that shut down our fluid catalytic cracking unit. In addition, for two weeks in February, winter storm Uri disrupted the Mid-Valley pipeline which supplies the refinery’s feedstock, further impacting throughput. Throughput rates began ramping up in March as market conditions improved. In the second quarter, third-party maintenance at the Mid-Valley and West Texas Gulf pipelines which reduced throughput. Throughput rates increased in late May and June after completion of the maintenance.
At the Toledo Refinery, throughput was optimized in line with market demand in the first half of 2021.
Gross Margin
While market crack spreads are an indicator of margin from processing crude oil into refined products, the refining realized crack spread, which is the gross margin on a per-barrel basis, is affected by many factors, such as the variety of feedstock crude oil processed; refinery configuration and the proportion of gasoline, distillate and secondary product output; the time lag between the purchase of crude oil feedstock and the processing of that crude oil through the refineries; and the cost of feedstock. Processing less expensive crude relative to WTI creates a feedstock cost advantage. Our feedstock costs are valued on a FIFO accounting basis.
In the second quarter of 2021, gross margin increased $208 million compared with the second quarter of 2020, primarily due to higher crude throughput, market crack spreads, and crude advantage. The increase was partially offset by a non-cash inventory write-down of $243 million on March 31, 2020 which resulted in a lower purchased product expense in the second quarter of 2020. Also offsetting the increase was higher RINs costs and lower margins on fixed price products due to higher benchmark WTI.
In the first six months of 2021, gross margin increased $901 million compared with 2020 driven by improved market crack spreads combined with increased throughput, partially offset by higher RINs costs and lower margins on clean and fixed price products.
Gross margin further improved in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 by additional crude throughput and sales volumes from assets acquired in the Arrangement.
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the cost of RINs was $305 million and $485 million, respectively (2020 – $37 million and $69 million, respectively) due to higher RINs pricing and assets acquired in the Arrangement. RINs prices were US$8.12 per barrel and US$6.80 per barrel in the three and six months ended 2021, respectively (2020 - US$2.21 per barrel and US$1.90, respectively). RINs pricing was volatile in the first half of the year, ranging from slightly over US$4.00 per barrel to almost US$10.00 per barrel.
Operating Expenses
Primary drivers of operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, were repairs and maintenance, workforce costs, and utilities. In the second quarter of 2021, operating expenses increased $218 million compared with the second quarter of 2020 due to assets acquired in the Arrangement, combined with turnaround activities at the Wood River refinery. In the second quarter of 2021, per-unit operating expenses decreased $1.95 per barrel to $9.96 per barrel primarily due to higher crude throughput at the Wood River and Borger refineries, partially offset by turnaround activities at the Wood River refinery.
In the first six months of 2021, operating costs increased $414 million compared with the first half of 2020. The increase was due to assets acquired in the Arrangement, combined with turnaround activities at Wood River and Borger refineries and higher utility pricing at the Lima and Borger refineries associated with the impacts of winter storm Uri in the first quarter of 2021.
DD&A
U.S. Manufacturing assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service life of each component of the facilities, which range from three to 60 years. The service lives of these assets are reviewed on an annual basis. ROU assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. U.S. Manufacturing DD&A was $103 million and $217 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively (2020 – $71 million and $148 million, respectively). The increase is a result of assets acquired in the Arrangement.
33


RETAIL
Retail operations were acquired on January 1, 2021, as part of the Arrangement.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, our retail and commercial network averaged 535 and 538, respectively, independently operated Husky and Esso branded petroleum product outlets. Our retail and commercial operating model is balanced by corporate owned/dealer operated and branded dealer-owned-and-operated sites. The network consists of a variety of full- and self-serve retail stations, travel centres and cardlocks serving urban and rural markets across Canada, while our bulk distributors offer direct sales to commercial and agricultural markets in the prairie provinces.
Financial Results
($ millions)Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Gross Sales501 948 
Purchased Product466 883 
Gross Margin35 65 
Expenses
Operating29 48 
Operating Margin6 17 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization13 25 
Segment Income (Loss)(7)(8)
Select Operating Results
Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2021
Fuel Sales Volume, including wholesale
Fuel Sales (millions of litres/d)
6.7 6.6 
Fuel Sales per Retail Outlet (thousands of litres/d)
12.5 12.3 
Gross Margin
Gross margin is primarily driven by gasoline and diesel prices and retail pricing for motor fuels.
Operating expenses
Primary drivers of our operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, were repairs and maintenance, property tax, workforce, and utilities.
DD&A
Retail assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service life of each component of the facilities, which range from three to 60 years. The service lives of these assets are reviewed on an annual basis. ROU assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, Retail DD&A was $13 million and $25 million, respectively, as a result of retail assets acquired in the Arrangement.
CORPORATE AND ELIMINATIONS
In the six months ended June 30, 2021, our risk management activities resulted in realized risk management losses of $92 million (2020 – losses of $5 million) primarily due to the realization, in the first quarter of 2021, of WTI put and call option contracts acquired as part of the Arrangement.
34


Expenses
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
($ millions)2021202020212020
General and Administrative (1)
170 96 333 73 
Finance Costs232 139 476 246 
Interest Income(3)(1)(7)(2)
Integration Costs34 — 257 — 
Foreign Exchange (Gain) Loss, Net(172)(310)(289)327 
Re-measurement of Contingent Payment249 64 436 (66)
(Gain) Loss on Divestiture of Assets(60)— (72)
Other (Income) Loss, Net (2)
(29)(32)(101)(38)
421 (44)1,033 541 
(1)Onerous contract provisions of $1 million and $3 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, have been reclassified to general and administrative expenses.
(2)Research costs of $2 million and $5 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, have been reclassified to Other (Income) Loss, Net.
General and Administrative
Primary drivers of our general and administrative expenses were workforce costs, employee long-term incentive costs, information technology costs, and operating costs associated with our real estate portfolio. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, general and administrative expenses increased year-over-year due to a larger workforce resulting from the Arrangement. In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2021 long-term incentive costs were higher than the same period in 2020 due to a year-to-date share price increase compared with a year-to-date share price decrease in 2020.
Finance Costs
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, finance costs increased by $93 million and $230 million, respectively, due to interest expense on short-term borrowings and long-term debt assumed as part of the Arrangement. In addition, an increase to the unwinding of the discount on decommissioning liabilities, and interest expense on lease liabilities as result of liabilities assumed as part of the Arrangement. Also contributing to the increase in the first half of 2021 was a net discount on the redemption of long-term debt in the first quarter of 2020.
The weighted average interest rate on outstanding debt for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, was 4.6 percent (three and six months ended June 30, 2020 – 4.6 percent and 4.8 percent, respectively).
Integration Costs
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, we incurred $34 million and $257 million, respectively, of costs as a result of the Arrangement, not including capital expenditures. Integration costs included $155 million of severance payments, $65 million of transaction costs, and $37 million in other integration related costs for the first half of 2021.
Foreign Exchange
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
($ millions)2021202020212020
Unrealized Foreign Exchange (Gain) Loss(192)(288)(331)369 
Realized Foreign Exchange (Gain) Loss20 (22)42 (42)
(172)(310)(289)327 
In the second quarter of 2021 and on a year-to-date basis, unrealized foreign exchange gains of $192 million and $331 million, respectively, were mainly as a result of the translation of our U.S. dollar denominated debt.
Re-measurement of Contingent Payment
Related to Foster Creek and Christina Lake production, Cenovus agreed to make quarterly payments to ConocoPhillips Company and certain of its subsidiaries (“ConocoPhillips”) during the five years subsequent to the closing date of the acquisition from ConocoPhillips of its 50 percent interest in the FCCL Partnership on May 17, 2017, (the “Conoco Acquisition”), for quarters in which the average WCS crude oil price exceeds $52 per barrel during the quarter. The quarterly payment is $6 million for each dollar that the WCS price exceeds $52 per barrel. There are no maximum payment terms. The calculation includes an adjustment mechanism related to certain significant production outages at Foster Creek and Christina Lake, which may reduce the amount of a contingent payment.
The contingent payment is accounted for as a financial option. The fair value of $376 million as at June 30, 2021, was estimated by calculating the present value of the future expected cash flows using an option pricing model. The contingent payment is re-
35


measured at fair value at each reporting date with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, non-cash re-measurement losses of $249 million and $436 million, respectively, were recorded. As at June 30, 2021, $90 million was payable under this agreement, of which a portion will be recognized in the third quarter as cash flow from operating activities and reduce adjusted funds flow when the payment is made. All payments thereafter will be recognized as cash flow from operating activities and included in adjusted funds flow.
Average WCS forward pricing for the remaining term of the contingent payment is $69.35 per barrel. Estimated quarterly WCS forward prices for the remaining term of the agreement range between approximately $66.94 per barrel and $72.08 per barrel.
Other (Income) Loss, Net
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, other (income) loss decreased by $3 million and increased by $63 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, business interruption insurance proceeds related to the Superior Refinery was $nil and $45 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the Headwater Exploration Inc. warrants revaluation gain was $6 million and $25 million, respectively.
DD&A
Corporate and Eliminations DD&A includes provisions in respect of corporate assets, such as computer equipment, leasehold improvements, office furniture and certain ROU assets. Costs associated with corporate assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service life of the assets, which range from three to 25 years. ROU assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. DD&A in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, was $31 million and $62 million, respectively (2020 – $32 million and $77 million, respectively). The decrease in DD&A for the six months ended June 30, 2021, was primarily due to an impairment loss of $8 million related to leasehold improvements in 2020.
Income Tax
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
($ millions)2021202020212020
Current Tax
Canada2 (2)14 (2)
United States  
Asia Pacific47 — 81 — 
Other International — 1 — 
Current Tax Expense (Recovery)49 (1)96 (1)
Deferred Tax Expense (Recovery)63 (131)90 (479)
Total Tax Expense (Recovery)112 (132)186 (480)
Tax interpretations, regulations and legislation in the various jurisdictions in which Cenovus and its subsidiaries operate are subject to change. We believe that our provision for income taxes is adequate. There are usually a number of tax matters under review and with consideration of the current economic environment, income taxes are subject to measurement uncertainty. The timing of the recognition of income and deductions for the purpose of current tax expense is determined by relevant tax legislation.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the Company recorded a current tax expense primarily related to Asia Pacific operations in China as well as provincial tax from Cenovus operations in Canada. The increase is due to Asia Pacific operations acquired in the Arrangement and higher earnings compared with the second quarter of 2020.
Our effective tax rate is a function of the relationship between total tax expense (recovery) and the amount of earnings (loss) before income taxes. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate as it reflects different tax rates in other jurisdictions, non-taxable foreign exchange (gains) losses, adjustments for changes in tax rates and other tax legislation, adjustments to the tax basis of the refining assets, variations in the estimate of reserves, differences between the provision and the actual amounts subsequently reported on the tax returns, and other permanent differences.









36


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
($ millions)2021202020212020
Cash From (Used In)
Operating Activities1,369 (834)1,597 (709)
Investing Activities(424)(206)(220)(527)
Net Cash Provided (Used) Before Financing Activities945 (1,040)1,377 (1,236)
Financing Activities(717)1,041 (678)1,223 
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss) on Cash and Cash Equivalents Held in Foreign Currency(46)(9)(22)(21)
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents182 (8)677 (34)
June 30,
2021
December 31,
2020
Cash and Cash Equivalents1,055 378 
Debt (1)
13,445 7,562 
(1)Includes long-term debt and short-term borrowings. On January 1, 2021, on the closing of the Arrangement, we acquired cash and cash equivalents of $735 million and debt of $6,642 million.
    Cash From (Used in) Operating Activities
For the three months ended June 30, 2021, cash generated by operating activities increased compared with 2020 mainly due to higher Operating Margin and distributions received from equity-accounted affiliates, partially offset by higher finance costs and general and administrative expenses as discussed in the Corporate and Eliminations section of this MD&A.
For the six months ended June 30, 2021, cash generated by operating activities increased compared with 2020 mainly due to higher Operating Margin and distributions received from equity-accounted affiliates. The increase was partially offset by changes in non-cash working capital, and higher integration costs and finance costs as discussed in the Corporate and Eliminations section of this MD&A.
Excluding the current portion of the contingent payment, our working capital was $1,685 million at June 30, 2021, compared with $653 million at December 31, 2020. The increase in working capital is primarily due to increased inventories and accounts receivable and accrued revenues and was partially offset by increased accounts payable and accrued liabilities. These increases were due to the improved commodity price environment, higher crude oil and feedstock prices and the Arrangement as discussed in the Operating and Financial Results section of this MD&A.
We anticipate that we will continue to meet our payment obligations as they come due.
Cash From (Used in) Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was higher in the three months ended June 30, 2021, compared with 2020 primarily due to higher capital spending, partially offset by proceeds from divestitures.
Cash used in investing activities was lower in the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared with 2020 primarily due to cash acquired through the Arrangement and proceeds from divestitures, partially offset by higher capital spending mainly as result of our larger asset base acquired through the Arrangement.
Cash From (Used in) Financing Activities
During the second quarter, we repaid $196 million in short-term borrowings and $400 million of revolving long-term debt.
During the first six months of 2021, we repaid $89 million in short-term borrowings and $350 million of revolving long-term debt. In the first six months of 2020, we repurchased US$100 million of unsecured notes for cash of US$81 million.
Total Debt
Total debt, including short-term borrowings, as at June 30, 2021, was $13,445 million (December 31, 2020 – $7,562 million). The increase in total debt was mainly due to the assumption of debt at closing of the Arrangement on January 1, 2021, with a fair value of $6,642 million. The principal amount of debt assumed that is owed to lenders between 2022 and 2037 is $5,709 million. We have reduced our total debt by $759 million since the closing of the Arrangement.
As at June 30, 2021, we were in compliance with all of the terms of our debt agreements.
37


Common Share Dividends
In the second quarter of 2021, we paid dividends of $36 million or $0.0175 per common share (2020 – $nil).
In the first six months of 2021, we paid dividends of $71 million or $0.0350 per common share (2020 – $77 million or $0.0625 per commons share). The declaration of dividends is at the sole discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and is considered quarterly.
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Dividends
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, dividends of $8 million and $17 million, respectively, were paid on the Series 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 preferred shares. The declaration of preferred share dividends is at the sole discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and is considered quarterly.
Available Sources of Liquidity
The following sources of liquidity are available at June 30, 2021:
($ millions)TermAmount Available
Cash and Cash EquivalentsNot applicable1,055 
Committed Credit Facilities
$2.0 Billion Revolving Credit FacilityJune 20222,000 
$1.2 Billion Revolving Credit Facility – Tranche BNovember 20221,200 
$3.3 Billion Revolving Credit Facility – Tranche ANovember 20233,300 
$2.0 Billion Revolving Credit FacilityMarch 20242,000 
Uncommitted Demand Facilities
Cenovus Energy Inc.Not applicable2,003 
WRB Refining LP (Cenovus's proportionate share)Not applicable121 
Sunrise Oil Sands Partnership (Cenovus's proportionate share)Not applicable5
We expect to fund our near-term cash requirements through cash from operating activities and prudent use of our balance sheet capacity including draws on our committed credit facilities and our uncommitted demand facilities and other corporate and financial opportunities that may be available to us. We remain committed to maintaining our investment grade credit ratings at S&P Global Ratings, Moody’s Investor Service and DBRS Limited and re-establishing investment grade ratings at Fitch Ratings. The cost and availability of borrowing, and access to sources of liquidity and capital is dependent on current credit ratings and market conditions.
Under the terms of our committed credit facilities, we are required to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio, as defined in the debt agreements, not to exceed 65 percent. We are well below this limit.
Committed Credit Facilities
We have total committed credit facilities of $8.5 billion. As at June 30, 2021, there were no amounts drawn on the committed credit facilities (December 31, 2020 – $nil).
Uncommitted Demand Facilities
We have uncommitted demand facilities of $2.5 billion in place, of which $1.5 billion may be drawn for general purposes or the full amount can be available to issue letters of credit. As at June 30, 2021, there were no amounts drawn on these facilities (December 31, 2020 – $nil) and there were outstanding letters of credit aggregating to $532 million (December 31, 2020 – $441 million).
WRB Refining LP has uncommitted demand facilities of US$300 million (our proportionate share – US$150 million) available to cover short-term working capital requirements. As at June 30, 2021, US$105 million was drawn on these facilities, of which US$53 million ($65 million) was our proportionate share (December 31, 2020 – $121 million).
Sunrise Oil Sands Partnership has an uncommitted demand credit facility of $10 million available for general purposes. Our proportionate share is $5 million. There were no amounts drawn on this demand credit facility at June 30, 2021 (December 31, 2020 – $nil).
Canadian Dollar Unsecured Notes and U.S. Dollar Denominated Unsecured Notes
Effective March 31, 2021, Cenovus Energy Inc., as a result of the Arrangement and subsequent amalgamation of Husky Energy Inc. into Cenovus Energy Inc., became the direct obligor under the existing US$500 million 3.95 percent notes due 2022, US$750 million 4.00 percent notes due 2024, $750 million 3.55 percent notes due 2025, $750 million 3.60 percent notes due 2027, $1,250 million 3.50 percent notes due 2028, US$750 million 4.40 percent notes due 2029, US$387 million 6.80 percent notes due 2037 and other direct obligations of Husky Energy Inc.
38


Base Shelf Prospectus
We have a base shelf prospectus in place that allows us to offer, from time to time, up to US$5.0 billion, or the equivalent in other currencies, of debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, subscription receipts, warrants, share purchase contracts and units in Canada, the U.S. and elsewhere where permitted by law. The base shelf prospectus will expire in October 2021. As at June 30, 2021, US$3.7 billion remained available under the base shelf prospectus for permitted offerings.
Financial Metrics
We monitor our capital structure and financing requirements using, among other things, non-GAAP financial metrics consisting of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA and Net Debt to Capitalization. We define our non-GAAP measure of Net Debt as short-term borrowings, and the current and long-term portions of long-term debt, net of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. We define Capitalization as Net Debt plus Equity. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net earnings before finance costs, interest income, income tax expense (recovery), DD&A, exploration expense, goodwill impairments, asset impairments and reversals, unrealized gains (losses) on risk management, foreign exchange gains (losses), revaluation gain, re-measurement of contingent payment, gains (losses) on divestiture of assets, other income (loss), net, and share of income (loss) from equity-accounted investees calculated on a trailing 12-month basis. These measures are used to steward our overall debt position and as measures of our overall financial strength.
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Net Debt to Capitalization (1) (percent)
34 30 
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA (times)
2.8x11.9x
(1)Net Debt to Capitalization is defined as Net Debt divided by Net Debt plus Shareholders’ Equity.
We target a Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of less than 2.0 times, and substantially lower, over the long-term. This ratio may periodically be above the target due to factors such as persistently low commodity prices. Our objective is to maintain a high level of capital discipline and manage our capital structure to help ensure we have sufficient liquidity through all stages of the economic cycle. To ensure financial resilience, we may, among other actions, adjust capital and operating spending, draw down on our credit facilities or repay existing debt, adjust dividends paid to shareholders, repurchase our common shares for cancellation, issue new debt, or issue new shares.
On December 31, 2020, before the Arrangement, our Net Debt to Capitalization was 30 percent. Our Net Debt to Capitalization increased to 36 percent on March 31, 2021, primarily due to Net Debt assumed from the Arrangement. In the three months ended June 30, 2021, we reduced our Net Debt to Capitalization by two percent to 34 percent as our Net Debt decreased.
As at June 30, 2021, our Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA was 2.8 times. Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA decreased compared with the fourth quarter of 2020 as a result of higher Operating Margin in the second quarter in 2021, offset by an increase in our Net Debt acquired as part of the Arrangement. See the Operating and Financial Results section of this MD&A for more information on Net Debt.
We are in compliance with all of the terms of our debt agreements. Under the terms of our committed credit facilities, we are required to maintain a total debt to capitalization ratio, as defined in the agreements, not to exceed 65 percent. We are well below this limit.
Additional information regarding our financial measures and capital structure can be found in the notes to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
Share Capital and Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Under the Arrangement, we acquired all the issued and outstanding Husky common shares in consideration for the issuance of 0.7845 Cenovus common shares plus 0.0651 Cenovus warrants. We issued 788.5 million Cenovus common shares with a fair value of $6.1 billion, based on the December 31, 2020, closing share price of $7.75, as reported on the TSX. In addition, 65.4 million common share purchase warrants were issued. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to acquire one Cenovus common share for a period of five years at an exercise price of $6.54 per share. The fair value of the warrants was estimated to be $216 million. We also acquired all the issued and outstanding Husky preferred shares in exchange for 36.0 million Cenovus first preferred shares with substantially identical terms and a fair value of $519 million.
We have a number of stock-based compensation plans which include stock options and associated net settlement rights, performance share units (“PSUs”), restricted share units (“RSUs”) and deferred share units (“DSUs”). In connection with the Arrangement, at the closing of the transaction on January 1, 2021, outstanding Husky stock options were replaced by Cenovus replacement stock options (“Cenovus Replacement Stock Options”). Each Cenovus Replacement Stock Option entitles the holder to acquire 0.7845 of a Cenovus common share at an exercise price per share of a Husky stock option divided by 0.7845. The fair value of the replacement stock options was estimated to be $9 million.
As at June 30, 2021, there were approximately 2,018 million common shares outstanding (December 31, 2020  1,229 million common shares). Refer to Note 22 of the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
39


Refer to Note 24 of the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on our stock option plans and our PSU, RSU and DSU Plans.
Our outstanding share data is as follows:
As at July 22, 2021
Units Outstanding
(thousands)
Units Exercisable
(thousands)
Common Shares (1)
2,017,612 N/A
Common Share Warrants65,244 N/A
Preferred Shares Series 110,740 N/A
Preferred Shares Series 21,260 N/A
Preferred Shares Series 310,000 N/A
Preferred Shares Series 58,000 N/A
Preferred Shares Series 76,000 N/A
Stock Options (1)
40,667 26,514 
Other Stock-Based Compensation Plans14,978 1,541 
(1)Includes Cenovus Replacement Stock Options (defined above) issued pursuant to the Arrangement in replacement of all issued and outstanding Husky stock options.
Capital Investment Decisions
Our 2021 capital program is forecast to be between $2.3 billion and $2.7 billion. Our investment is focused on maintaining safe and reliable operations, while positioning the Company to drive enhanced shareholder value that includes sustaining capital of approximately $2.1 billion to deliver upstream production of approximately 770.0 thousand BOE per day and downstream throughput of approximately 525.0 thousand barrels per day.
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
($ millions)2021202020212020
Adjusted Funds Flow1,817 (469)2,958 (623)
Total Capital Investment534 147 1,081 451 
Free Funds Flow (1)
1,283 (616)1,877 (1,074)
Cash Dividends44 — 88 77 
1,239 (616)1,789 (1,151)
(1)Free Funds Flow is a non-GAAP measure defined as Adjusted Funds Flow less capital investment.
Our approach on the financial framework remains consistent with the parameters we have set for Cenovus in prior years. We will continue to evaluate all opportunities based on a US$45 per barrel WTI price with the objective of maintaining a prudent and flexible capital structure and strong balance sheet metrics. This approach positions us to be financially resilient in times of lower cash flows. Balance sheet strength continues to be a top priority and we plan to continue to direct our Free Funds Flow towards debt reduction. We continue to target a Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of less than 2.0 times.
We remain committed to investment-grade credit ratings and strengthening our ratings from current levels. This includes our continued focus on allocating Free Funds Flow to reduce Net Debt to less than $10 billion and targeting a longer-term Net Debt level at or below $8 billion. The Adjusted Funds Flow is expected to fully fund sustaining capital and shareholder distributions going forward once one-time integration costs associated with the Arrangement are complete.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We have obligations for goods and services entered into in the normal course of business. Obligations are primarily related to transportation agreements, our risk management program and an obligation to fund our defined benefit pension and other post-employment benefit plans. Obligations that have original maturities of less than one year are excluded. For further information, see the notes to the June 30, 2021, interim Consolidated Financial Statements and December 31, 2020 Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Arrangement resulted in the assumption of non-cancellable contracts and other commercial commitments. On January 1, 2021, we assumed total commitments of $17.6 billion, of which $7.4 billion were for various transportation commitments. Transportation commitments include $1.7 billion that are subject to regulatory approval or have been approved but are not yet in service.
Our total commitments were $33.0 billion as at June 30, 2021, of which $29.4 billion are for various transportation and storage commitments. Terms are up to 20 years subsequent to the date of commencement and should help align with the Company’s future transportation requirements.
40


As at June 30, 2021, there were no amounts included in the transportation and storage commitments related to the Keystone XL pipeline due to the cancellation of our transportation services agreement related to the project (December 31, 2020 – $7.0 billion).
Our commitments with HMLP at June 30, 2021, include $2.8 billion related to transportation, storage and other long-term contracts.
We continue to focus on mid-term strategies to broaden market access for our crude oil production including supporting proposed pipeline projects to transport our production to new markets in the U.S. and globally, as well as moving our crude oil production to market by rail. We continue to assess all options to maximize the value of our crude oil.
As at June 30, 2021, outstanding letters of credit issued as security for performance under certain contracts totaled $532 million (December 31, 2020 – $441 million).
Legal Proceedings
We are involved in a limited number of legal claims associated with the normal course of operations. We believe that any liabilities that might arise from such matters, to the extent not provided for, are not likely to have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contingent Payment
In connection with the Conoco Acquisition and related to a portion of our oil sands production, we agreed to make quarterly payments to ConocoPhillips during the five years subsequent to May 17, 2017 for quarters in which the average WCS crude oil price exceeds $52.00 per barrel during the quarter. As at June 30, 2021, the estimated fair value of the contingent payment was $376 million. As at June 30, 2021, $90 million was payable under the agreement. See the Corporate and Eliminations section of this MD&A for more details.
Transactions with Related Parties
Transactions with HMLP are related party transactions as we have a 35 percent ownership interest in HMLP.
As the operator of the assets held by HMLP, we provide management services for which we recover shared service costs.
We are also the contractor for HMLP and construct its assets on a cost recovery basis with certain restrictions. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2021, we charged HMLP $32 million and $64 million, respectively, for construction and management services.
We pay an access fee to HMLP for the use of its pipeline systems that are used by our blending business. We also pay HMLP for transportation and storage services. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, we incurred costs of $73 million and $145 million, respectively, for the use of HMLP’s pipeline systems, as well as transportation and storage services.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND RISK FACTORS
For a full understanding of the risks that impact us, the following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Risk Management and Risk Factors section of our 2020 annual MD&A.
We are exposed to a number of risks through the pursuit of our strategic objectives. Some of these risks impact the energy industry as a whole and others are unique to our operations. The impact of any risk or a combination of risks may adversely affect, among other things, Cenovus’s business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, which may reduce or restrict our ability to pursue our strategic priorities, respond to changes in our operating environment, pay dividends to our shareholders and fulfill our obligations (including debt servicing requirements) and may materially affect the market price of our securities.
The following provides an update on our risks.
Obligor Under Husky's Existing Notes
Effective March 31, 2021, Cenovus Energy Inc. amalgamated with its wholly-owned subsidiary Husky Energy Inc. under the provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act. As a result of the amalgamation, Cenovus Energy Inc. became the direct obligor under Husky's existing US$500 million 3.95 percent notes due in 2022, US$750 million 4.00 percent notes due in 2024, $750 million 3.55 percent notes due in 2025, $750 million 3.60 percent notes due in 2027, $1,250 million 3.50 percent notes due in 2028, US$750 million 4.40 percent notes due in 2029, US$387 million 6.80 percent notes due in 2037, and other direct obligations of Husky. See "Risk Management and Risk Factors – Other Risks – Risks Related to the Arrangement – Increased Indebtedness" in our 2020 annual MD&A.
41


Financial Risk
Commodity Prices
Fluctuations in commodity prices, associated price differentials and refining margins impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, growth, access to capital and cost of borrowing. We partially mitigate our exposure to commodity price risk through the integration of our business, financial instruments, physical contracts, market access commitments and generally through our access to committed credit facilities. In certain instances, Cenovus will use derivative instruments to manage exposure to price volatility on a portion of its refined product, crude oil and natural gas production, inventory or volumes in long-distance transit. For details of our financial instruments, including classification, assumptions made in the calculation of fair value and additional discussion on exposure of risks and the management of those risks, see Notes 26 and 27 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
Risks Associated with Derivative Financial Instruments
Financial instruments expose us to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations. This risk is partially mitigated through credit exposure limits, frequent assessment of counterparty credit ratings and netting arrangements, as outlined in our Board-approved Credit Policy.
Financial instruments also expose us to the risk of a loss from adverse changes in the market value of financial instruments or if we are unable to fulfill our delivery obligations related to the underlying physical transaction. Financial instruments may limit the benefit to us if commodity prices, interest or foreign exchange rates change. These risks are managed through hedging limits authorized according to our Market Risk Management Policy.
Impact of Financial Risk Management Activities
Cenovus makes storage and transportation decisions using our marketing and transportation infrastructure, including storage and pipeline assets to optimize product mix, delivery points, transportation commitments and customer diversification. In order to price protect our inventories associated with the storage or transport decisions, Cenovus employs various price alignment and volatility management strategies, including through risk management contracts, to reduce volatility in future cash flows to improve cash flow stability while we are deleveraging our balance sheet.
Transactions typically span across periods, as such, these transactions reside across both realized and unrealized risk management. As the financial contracts settle, they will flow from unrealized to realized risk management gains and losses.
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, we incurred a realized risk management loss due to the settlement of benchmark prices relative to our risk management contract prices; the underlying physical inventory sold in the periods recognized a gain due to rising benchmark prices. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, unrealized losses were recorded on our crude oil financial instruments primarily due to forward benchmark pricing rising above our risk management contract prices that related to future periods and the realization of settled positions. In a rising commodity price environment, we would expect to realize losses on our risk management activities but recognize gains on the underlying physical inventory sold in the period and the opposite to occur in a falling commodity price environment.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGMENTS, ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTIES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management is required to make estimates and assumptions, as well as use judgment in the application of accounting policies that could have a significant impact on our financial results. Actual results may differ from estimates and those differences may be material. The estimates and assumptions used are subject to updates based on experience and the application of new information. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are reviewed annually by the Audit Committee of the Board. Further details on the basis of preparation and our significant accounting policies can be found in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Critical Judgments in Applying Accounting Policies and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty
Critical judgments are those judgments made by Management in the process of applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recorded in our annual and interim Consolidated Financial Statements. A full list of the key sources of estimation uncertainty can be found in our annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. In 2021, the Company made updates to its critical judgments in applying accounting policies and key sources of estimation uncertainty including the assessment of joint arrangements, recoveries from insurance claims, functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries and the fair value of related party transactions. Updates to critical judgments and key sources of estimation relate to changes in the operations of the Company as a result of the close of the Arrangement. Further information can be found in Note 3 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
42


Changes in Accounting Policies
In 2021, as a result of the close of the Arrangement, the Company updated its significant accounting policies including those around principles of consolidation, revenue recognition, employee benefit plans, related party transactions, cash and cash equivalents, PP&E, share capital and warrants and stock based compensation. Further information can be found in Note 3 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet Adopted
There are new standards, amendments to accounting standards and interpretations that are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2021. There were no new or amended accounting standards or interpretations issued during the six months ended June 30, 2021, that are expected to have a material impact on our interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONTROL ENVIRONMENT
Management, including our President & Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer, assessed the design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”) and disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) as at June 30, 2021. In making its assessment, Management used the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission Framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) to evaluate the design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Based on our evaluation, Management has concluded that both ICFR and DC&P were effective as at June 30, 2021.
On January 1, 2021, Cenovus and Husky closed the Arrangement to combine the two companies. As permitted by and in accordance with, National Instrument 52-109, “Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings”, and guidance issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Management has limited the scope and design of ICFR and DC&P to exclude the controls, policies and procedures in respect of the business acquired from Husky. Such scope limitation is primarily due to the time required for Management to assess the ICFR and DC&P relating to Husky in a manner consistent with our other operations. Further integration will take place throughout the year as processes and systems align.
Assets attributable to Husky as at June 30, 2021, represented approximately 35 percent of Cenovus’s total assets, and revenues attributable to Husky for the period April 1 to June 30, 2021, represented approximately 45 percent of Cenovus’s total revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2021. Revenues attributable to Husky for the period January 1 to June 30, 2021, represented approximately 50 percent of Cenovus’s total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2021.
Internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
OUTLOOK
Energy markets have moved in a positive direction since 2020 but we believe that the remainder of 2021 will continue to face uncertainty. The global COVID-19 vaccine rollout is accelerating and economic growth is healthy. However, the scale of resurgence and variants of COVID-19 cases is unpredictable and likely to result in crude oil and refined products market volatility through the remainder of the year. Continued successful distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and the easing of restrictions will be supportive of demand. OPEC+ policy continues to support balancing the market and the group has indicated that supply will gradually be brought back through the year as demand improves. Government policy and stimulus measures are driving expectations of global economic recovery and improving energy consumption. There is optimism around the summer driving season and an increase in demand for refined products in the second half of 2021.
Our focus remains on maintaining the strength of our balance sheet. We have ample liquidity, high quality assets which we are able to effectively manage to respond to price signals, some of the lowest cost structures in the industry and have demonstrated our ability to reduce discretionary capital, all of which should allow us to continue to adapt to potential ongoing market volatility.
We continue to monitor the overall market dynamics to assess how we manage our upstream production levels. Our assets can respond to market signals and ramp production up or down accordingly. Our decisions around production levels and refinery crude run rates will be focused on maximizing the value we receive for our products. We expect our annual upstream production to average between 750.0 thousand BOE per day and 790.0 thousand BOE per day and total downstream throughput of 500.0 thousand barrels per day to 550.0 thousand barrels per day.
We continue to work towards achieving approximately $400 million of the estimated corporate and operating synergies and approximately $600 million of the estimated capital allocation synergies this year. Over the longer-term, we anticipate additional cost savings and margin enhancements based on further physical integration of upstream assets with downstream
43


assets, which is expected to shorten the value chain and reduce condensate costs associated with heavy oil transportation. We continue to look for additional opportunities to reduce operating, capital, and general and administrative spending and increase our margins through strong operating performance and cost leadership while focusing on safe and reliable operations.
The following outlook commentary is focused on the next 12 months.
Commodity Prices Underlying our Financial Results
Our commodity pricing outlook is influenced by the following:
We expect the general outlook for crude oil and refined product prices will be volatile and tied primarily to the supply and demand response to the current uncertain price environment, the impact of oversupply, global demand impacts amid COVID-19 concerns, and effectiveness and successful distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.
The degree to which OPEC+ members (including Russia) continue to maintain crude oil production cuts and the rate they decide to increase production.
We expect that the WTI-WCS differential in Alberta will remain largely tied to the extent to which supply cuts are sustained, the potential start-up of Enbridge Inc.’s Line 3 Replacement Project, the completion of the Trans Mountain Expansion project, and the level of crude-by-rail activity.
Refining market crack spreads are expected to be higher than 2020 as demand rebounds but are also increasing to offset the rising cost of RINs. Margins are likely to continue to fluctuate, adjusting for seasonal trends, and refining run cuts in North America.


image10a.jpg
44


image3a.jpg
(1)    RINs forward price information is unavailable at June 30, 2021.
Natural gas prices have rebounded from the 2020 lows and the forward curve shows that the market expects AECO prices to maintain these levels. Production declines from both associated gas and dry gas, along with rebounding U.S. demand and liquified natural gas exports should continue to tighten North American gas fundamentals for the next 12 months and result in stronger prices than 2020 on an annual basis.
Natural gas and NGLs production associated with our Conventional assets provide improved upstream integration for the fuel, solvent and blending requirements at our Oil Sands operations.
We expect the Canadian dollar to continue to be tied to crude oil prices, the pace at which the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and the Bank of Canada raise or lower benchmark lending rates relative to each other, and emerging macro-economic factors.
image4a.jpg
45


image11a.jpg
Our upstream crude oil production and most of our downstream refined products are exposed to movements in the WTI crude oil price. With the closing of the Arrangement, our exposure has grown on both the upstream and downstream sides of our business.
Our refining capacity is now focused in the U.S. Midwest along with smaller exposures in the USGC and Alberta, exposing Cenovus to the market crack spread in all of these markets.
Our exposure to crude differentials includes light-heavy and light-medium price differentials. Light-medium price differential exposure is focused on light-medium crudes in the U.S. Midwest market region where we have refining capacity, and to a lesser degree in the USGC and Alberta. Our exposure to light-heavy crude oil price differentials is composed of a global light-heavy component, a regional component in markets we transport barrels to, as well as the Alberta differential, which is subject to transportation constraints. While we expect to see volatility in crude oil prices, we have the ability to partially mitigate the impact of crude oil and refined product prices and differentials through the following:
Transportation commitments and arrangements – using our existing firm service commitments for takeaway capacity and supporting transportation projects that move crude oil from our production areas to consuming markets, including tidewater markets.
Integration – having heavy oil refining capacity capable of processing Canadian heavy oil. From a value perspective, our refining business positions us to capture value from both the WTI-WCS differential for Canadian crude oil as well as from spreads on refined products.
Marketing agreements – limiting the impact of fluctuations in upstream crude oil prices by entering into physical supply transactions with fixed price components directly with refiners.
Dynamic storage – our ability to use the significant storage capacity in our oil sands reservoirs provides us flexibility on timing of production and sales of our inventory. We will continue to manage our production rates in response to pipeline capacity constraints, voluntary and mandated production curtailments and crude oil price differentials.
Traditional crude oil storage tanks in various geographic locations.
Financial hedge transactions – limiting the impact of fluctuations in crude oil and refined product prices by entering into financial transactions related to our inventory price exposures.
Key Priorities For 2021
In the current commodity price environment, we continue to focus on maintaining balance sheet strength and liquidity. Enhancing our financial resilience and flexibility while continuing to deliver safe and reliable operations will continue to be a top priority during these uncertain times. We remain focused on our key priority of reducing our Net Debt.
Our corporate strategy focuses on maximizing shareholder value through cost leadership and realizing the best margins for our products. We plan to remain focused on disciplined capital investment allocation across the full suite of assets for the Company, and continue to identify opportunities to improve our cost structure and enhance margins. Furthermore, the Company prioritizes ongoing ESG leadership and integration of sustainability considerations into our business decisions.

46


Safe and Reliable Operations
Safe and reliable operations are our number one priority. Safety continues to be a core value that informs all of the decisions we make. We will continue to promote a safety culture in all aspects of our work and use a variety of programs to keep safety top of mind at all times.
Ensure Smooth Integration
In addition to financial and operating synergies, our focus is to create stability for our workforce and advance the high-performing culture of the combined Company. We aim to build an industry-leading people experience and advance leadership, commercial capability and inclusion and diversity programs. We also aim to enable continuity of business performance through practical, effective systems integration and optimization. We will refresh our vision, mission and values to reflect the Company going forward.
Capture Synergies and Maintain Cost Leadership
Capturing the corporate and operating cost synergies of approximately $400 million is well underway for 2021. We are on target to reach our planned total of $1.2 billion annual run-rate synergies by the end of 2021. We expect to meet these targets through the consolidation of information technology systems, eliminating other service overlaps, and through reductions to combined workforce and corporate overhead costs.
Over the longer term, we anticipate additional cost savings and margin enhancements based on further physical integration. The integration of upstream assets with the downstream and transportation, storage and logistics portfolio is expected to shorten the value chain and reduce condensate costs associated with heavy oil transportation over the longer term. We continue to look for ways to improve efficiencies across Cenovus to drive incremental capital, operating and general and administrative cost reductions.
Disciplined Capital Investment
We updated our 2021 guidance on July 28, 2021. The capital guidance range remains the same. However, our guidance now reflects an increase to Oil Sands capital investment by $100 million, offset by a reduction to U.S. Manufacturing, Canadian Manufacturing, and Retail totaling $100 million. We anticipate our total capital expenditures to be between $2.3 billion and $2.7 billion, including sustaining capital of approximately $2.1 billion and costs of $520 million to $570 million (excluding insurance proceeds) for the Superior Refinery rebuild. We will continue to be disciplined with our capital. The guidance data July 28, 2021 is available on our website at cenovus.com.
Our upstream production is expected to range between 750.0 thousand BOE per day and 790.0 thousand BOE per day for 2021. Downstream throughput is expected to be in the range of 500.0 thousand barrels per day to 550.0 thousand barrels per day for 2021. Capturing the estimated $600 million in annual capital allocation synergies is underway across the Company by optimizing sustaining capital to the highest quality assets while maintaining safe and reliable operations across our portfolio.
As at June 30, 2021, our Net Debt position was $12.4 billion. Through a combination of cash on hand and available capacity on our committed credit facilities and demand facilities, we have approximately $11.7 billion of liquidity. We will continue to focus on allocating Free Funds Flow to reduce Net Debt to less than $10 billion and target a longer-term Net Debt level at or below $8 billion.
Maintaining Financial Resilience
We have top-tier assets, some of the lowest cost structures in our industry and a strong balance sheet, all of which position us to withstand the challenges of the current market environment. Our capital planning process is flexible, and spending can be reduced in response to commodity prices and other economic factors to maintain our financial resilience. Our financial framework and flexible business plan allow multiple options to manage our balance sheet. We will continue to assess our spending plans on a regular basis while closely monitoring crude oil prices.
The Company’s priority will be to maximize Free Funds Flow by focusing investments on sustaining capital expenditures which will position us to direct available Free Funds Flow to the balance sheet and allow us to achieve a Net Debt target of $10 billion which approximates a Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA target of less than 2.0 times at the bottom of the cycle, which we see as approximately US$45 per barrel WTI.
The low funds flow volatility, breakeven prices and corporate sustaining costs supports an investment grade profile and lower cost of capital through the commodity price cycle. We remain committed to maintaining or re-establishing investment grade credit ratings.
Shareholder Returns
After achieving our balance sheet objectives, the Company’s free funds profile is expected to enable sustainable growth in shareholder distributions.
47


Environmental, Social and Governance
We are committed to demonstrating leading ESG performance. This includes setting and achieving ambitious ESG targets, maintaining robust management systems and continuing transparent performance reporting. We will continue working to earn our position as a global energy supplier of choice by advancing clean technology and reducing emissions intensity. This includes our ambition to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. One of the steps we have taken to achieve this goal is by co-founding the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero initiative as described in the Quarterly Results Overview section of this MD&A. We will also continue building upon our strong local community relationships, with a focus on Indigenous reconciliation.
We recently completed a robust ESG materiality assessment to identify the ESG topics that are most impactful to our new portfolio and highest priority for our stakeholders. Based on feedback from both internal and external stakeholders, climate and GHG emissions, water stewardship, biodiversity, Indigenous reconciliation and inclusion and diversity were established as our ESG focus areas. In addition, delivering safe and reliable operations and demonstrating strong governance remain foundational to how we manage our business.
In June 2021, we released our 2020 ESG data report which includes performance metrics for both Cenovus and Husky for 2020, as well as historical data for Cenovus from 2016 to 2019. Our reporting structure aligns with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board and IPIECA, formerly known as the International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association, reporting frameworks.
As we update long-term business plans we are also working to set meaningful ESG targets, further building on the announcement of our ESG focus areas. That work is expected to be completed later this year. Once it is approved by the Board, the new targets and proposed plans to achieve them will be disclosed. Concurrently with the disclosure of our ESG targets, we plan to publish a more comprehensive 2020 ESG report, which will include the pro-forma metrics that underpin the ESG targets. This report will align with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures as in previous years.
ADVISORY
Oil and Gas Information
Barrels of Oil Equivalent – natural gas volumes have been converted to barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) on the basis of six Mcf to one barrel (bbl). BOE may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A conversion ratio of one bbl to six Mcf is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil compared with natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency conversion ratio of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis is not an accurate reflection of value.
Forward-looking Information
This document contains certain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively referred to as “forward-looking information”) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, including the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, about our current expectations, estimates and projections about the future, based on certain assumptions made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends. Although we believe that the expectations represented by such forward-looking information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information as our actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied.
Forward-looking information in this document is identified by words such as “achieve”, “aim”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “can be”, “capacity”, “committed”, “commitment”, “continue”, “could”, “deliver”, “drive”, “enhance”, “ensure”, “estimate”, “expect”, “focus”, “forecast”, “forward”, “future”, “guidance”, “maintain”, “may”, “objective”, “outlook”, “plan”, “position”, “potential”, “priority”, “re-establishing”, “seek”, “strategy”, “should”, “target”, “will”, or similar expressions and includes suggestions of future outcomes, including, but not limited to, statements about: strategy, priorities and related milestones; schedules and plans; anticipated benefits of the Arrangement, including achieving corporate, operating and capital allocation synergies and efficiencies, longer term cost savings, debt reduction and enhanced margins; growth in shareholder distributions; actions taken in response to COVID-19 in our workplaces; statements and expectations relating to our 2021 budget; our ability to partially mitigate the impact of crude oil and refined product differentials; maintaining and re-establishing investment grade credit ratings; achieving Net Debt of less than $10 billion and $8 billion or lower longer-term; achieving our Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA target; maximizing shareholder value; maintaining liquidity; delivering a stable cash flow through price cycles and commodity price volatility and preserving a resilient balance sheet; expected production and throughput levels; becoming a global energy supplier of choice by advancing clean technology and reducing emissions intensity; ambitions to achieve net zero emissions by 2050; plans to strengthen local community relationships, with a focus on Indigenous reconciliation; plans to set and achieve new ESG targets; evaluating disciplined investments in our portfolio against dividends, share repurchases and managing to optimal debt level while maintaining investment grade status; forecast operating and financial results, including forecast sales prices, costs and cash flows; planned capital expenditures and investments, including the amount, timing and funding sources thereof; all statements with respect to our guidance dated July 28, 2021; our ability to take steps to partially
48


mitigate against wider WTI and WCS price differentials; funding our capital investment and near-term cash requirements through cash from operating activities and prudent use of our balance sheet capacity; focus on mid-term strategies to broaden market access for our crude oil production; preserving financial resilience; future impact of regulatory measures; forecast commodity prices, differentials and trends and expected impact; exchange and interest rates; potential impacts of various risks, including those related to commodity prices and climate change; the potential effectiveness of our risk management strategies; new accounting standards, the timing for the adoption thereof, and anticipated impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements; the immateriality of the effects of any liabilities that may arise out of legal claims associated with the normal course of our operations; the availability and repayment of our credit facilities; and expected impacts of the contingent payment to ConocoPhillips.
Developing forward-looking information involves reliance on a number of assumptions and consideration of certain risks and uncertainties, some of which are specific to Cenovus and others that apply to the industry generally. The factors or assumptions on which our forward-looking information is based include, but are not limited to: forecast oil and natural gas, NGLs, condensate and refined products prices, light-heavy crude oil price differentials; our ability to realize the benefits and anticipated cost synergies associated with the Arrangement; Cenovus’s ability to successfully integrate the business of Husky, including new business activities, assets, operating areas, regulatory jurisdictions, personnel and business partners for Cenovus; the accuracy of any assessments undertaken in connection with the Arrangement and any resulting pro forma information; forecast production volumes are subject to change based on business and market conditions; projected capital investment levels, the flexibility of capital spending plans and associated sources of funding; the absence of significant adverse changes to legislation and regulations, Indigenous relations, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, competitive conditions and the supply and demand for crude oil and natural gas, NGLs, condensate and refined products; the political, economic and social stability of jurisdictions in which Cenovus operates; the absence of significant disruption of operations, including as a result of harsh weather, natural disaster, accident, civil unrest or other similar events; the prevailing climatic conditions impacting Cenovus's operating locations; achievement of further cost reductions and sustainability thereof; applicable royalty regimes, including expected royalty rates; future improvements in availability of product transportation capacity; increase to our share price and market capitalization over the long term; cash flows, cash balances on hand and access to credit and demand facilities being sufficient to fund capital investments; our ability to reduce our 2021 production, including without negative impacts to our assets; realization of expected capacity to store within our oil sands reservoirs barrels not yet produced, including that we will be able to time production and sales of our inventory at later dates when demand has increased, pipeline and/or storage capacity has improved and crude oil differentials have narrowed; the WTI-WCS differential in Alberta remains largely tied to the extent to which voluntary economically driven supply cuts are made, the potential start-up of the Enbridge Inc.’s Line 3 Replacement Program, the completion of Trans Mountain Expansion project, and the level of crude-by-rail activity; the ability of our refining capacity, dynamic storage, existing pipeline commitments and financial hedge transactions to partially mitigate a portion of our WCS crude oil volumes against wider differentials; production declines from both associated gas and dry gas, along with rebounding U.S. demand and liquified natural gas exports should tighten North American gas fundamentals for the next 12 months and result in stronger prices than 2020 on an annual basis; estimates of quantities of oil, bitumen, natural gas and liquids from properties and other sources not currently classified as proved; the accuracy of accounting estimates and judgments; future use and development of technology and associated expected future results; our ability to obtain necessary regulatory and partner approvals; the successful, timely and cost effective implementation of capital projects or stages thereof; our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our current and future obligations; the sufficiency of existing cash balances, internally generated cash flows, existing credit facilities, management of the Corporation’s asset portfolio and access to capital markets to fund future development costs and dividends, including any increase thereto; estimated abandonment and reclamation costs, including associated levies and regulations applicable thereto; our ability to obtain and retain qualified staff and equipment in a timely and cost-efficient manner; our ability to access sufficient capital to pursue our development plans; our ability to complete asset sales, including with desired transaction metrics and within the timelines we expect; the stability of general domestic and global economic, market and business conditions; forecast inflation and other assumptions inherent in Cenovus’s guidance dated July 28, 2021 available on cenovus.com; our future results relative to the guidance dated July 28, 2021 based on current production volumes and operating expenses; expected impacts of, and calculation of, the contingent payment to ConocoPhillips; our ability to access and implement all technology and equipment necessary to achieve expected future results and that such results are realized; our ability to implement capital projects or stages thereof in a successful and timely manner; and other assumptions, risks and uncertainties described from time to time in the filings we make with securities regulatory authorities including the assumptions inherent in Cenovus’s 2021 guidance available on cenovus.com.
The risk factors and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking information, include, but are not limited to: the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, including any related restrictions, containment, and treatment measures taken by varying levels of government in the jurisdictions in which we operate; the success of our new COVID-19 workplace policies and the return of our people to our workplace; our ability to achieve the benefits and anticipated cost synergies anticipated with the Arrangement in a timely manner or at all; Cenovus’s ability to successfully integrate Husky’s business with its own in a timely and cost effective manner or at all; the effects of entering new business activities; unforeseen or undisclosed liabilities associated with the Arrangement; the inaccuracy of any assessments undertaken in connection with the Arrangement and any resulting pro forma information; the inaccuracy of any information
49


provided by Husky; our ability to access or implement some or all of the technology necessary to efficiently and effectively operate our assets and achieve expected future results; the effect of Cenovus’s increased indebtedness; the effect of new significant shareholders; volatility of and other assumptions regarding commodity prices; foreign exchange risk; a prolonged market downturn; changes in commodity price differentials; the effectiveness of our risk management program; the accuracy of cost estimates regarding commodity prices, currency and interest rates; lack of alignment of realized WCS prices and WCS prices used to calculate the contingent payment to ConocoPhillips; product supply and demand; the accuracy of our share price and market capitalization assumptions; market competition, including from alternative energy sources; risks inherent in our marketing operations, including credit risks, exposure to counterparties and partners, including the ability and willingness of such parties to satisfy contractual obligations in a timely manner; risks inherent in the operation of our crude-by-rail terminal, including health, safety and environmental risks; our ability to maintain desirable ratios of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA as well as Net Debt to Capitalization; our ability to access various sources of debt and equity capital, generally, and on terms acceptable to us; our ability to finance growth and sustaining capital expenditures; changes in credit ratings applicable to us or any of our securities; changes to our dividend plans; our ability to utilize tax losses in the future; the accuracy of our reserves, future production and future net revenue estimates; the accuracy of our accounting estimates and judgments; our ability to replace and expand oil and gas reserves; the costs to acquire exploration rights, undertake geological studies, appraisal drilling and project developments; potential requirements under applicable accounting standards for impairment or reversal of estimated recoverable amounts of some or all of our assets or goodwill from time to time; our ability to maintain our relationships with our partners and to successfully manage and operate our integrated operations and business; reliability of our assets including in order to meet production targets; potential disruption or unexpected technical difficulties in developing new products and manufacturing processes; the occurrence of unexpected events resulting in operational interruptions, including blowouts, fires, explosions, railcar incidents or derailments, aviation incidents, gaseous leaks, migration of harmful substances, loss of containment, releases or spills, including releases or spills from offshore facilities and shipping vessels at terminals or hubs and as a result of pipeline or other leaks, corrosion, epidemics or pandemics, and catastrophic events, including, but not limited to, war, extreme weather events, natural disasters, iceberg incidents, acts of vandalism and terrorism, and other accidents or hazards that may occur at or during transport to or from commercial or industrial sites and other accidents or similar events; refining and marketing margins; cost escalations, including inflationary pressures on operating costs, such as labour, materials, natural gas and other energy sources used in oil sands processes and increased insurance deductibles or premiums; the cost and availability of equipment necessary to our operations; potential failure of products to achieve or maintain acceptance in the market; risks associated with the energy industry’s and Cenovus’s reputation, social license to operate and litigation related thereto; unexpected cost increases or technical difficulties in operating, constructing or modifying manufacturing or refining facilities; unexpected difficulties in producing, transporting or refining bitumen and/or crude oil into petroleum and chemical products; risks associated with technology and equipment and its application to our business, including potential cyberattacks; geo-political and other risks associated with our international operations; risks associated with climate change and our assumptions relating thereto; the timing and the costs of well and pipeline construction; our ability to access markets and to secure adequate and cost effective product transportation including sufficient pipeline, crude-by-rail, marine or alternate transportation, including to address any gaps caused by constraints in the pipeline system or storage capacity; availability of, and our ability to attract and retain, critical talent; possible failure to obtain and retain qualified leadership and personnel, and equipment in a timely and cost efficient manner; changes in labour demographics and relationships, including with any unionized workforces; unexpected abandonment and reclamation costs; changes in the regulatory frameworks, permits and approvals in any of the locations in which we operate or to any of the infrastructure upon which we rely; government actions or regulatory initiatives to curtail energy operations or pursue broader climate change agendas; changes to regulatory approval processes and land-use designations, royalty, tax, environmental, greenhouse gas, carbon, climate change and other laws or regulations, or changes to the interpretation of such laws and regulations, as adopted or proposed, the impact thereof and the costs associated with compliance; the expected impact and timing of various accounting pronouncements, rule changes and standards on our business, our financial results and our Consolidated Financial Statements; changes in general economic, market and business conditions; the impact of production agreements among OPEC and non-OPEC members; the political, social and economic conditions in the jurisdictions in which we operate or supply; the status of our relationships with the communities in which we operate, including with Indigenous communities; the occurrence of unexpected events such as protests, pandemics, war, terrorist threats and the instability resulting therefrom; and risks associated with existing and potential future lawsuits, shareholder proposals and regulatory actions against us.
Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists are not exhaustive and are made as at the date hereof. Events or circumstances could cause our actual results to differ materially from those estimated or projected and expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking information. For a full discussion of our material risk factors, see Risk Management and Risk Factors in this MD&A, and to the risk factors described in other documents Cenovus files from time to time with securities regulatory authorities in Canada, available on SEDAR at sedar.com, and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR at sec.gov, and on the Corporation’s website at cenovus.com. Additional information concerning Husky’s business and assets as of December 31, 2020 may be found in the Husky Annual Information Form and Husky MD&A, each of which is filed and available on SEDAR under Husky's profile at sedar.com.
50


Information on or connected to Cenovus on Cenovus’s website at cenovus.com or Husky’s website at huskyenergy.com does not form part of this MD&A unless expressly incorporated by reference herein.
ABBREVIATIONS
The following abbreviations have been used in this document:

Crude OilNatural Gas
bblbarrelMcfthousand cubic feet
Mbbls/dthousand barrels per dayMMcfmillion cubic feet
MMbblsmillion barrelsBcfbillion cubic feet
BOEbarrel of oil equivalentMMBtumillion British thermal units
MMBOEMillion barrels of oil equivalentGJgigajoule
WTIWest Texas IntermediateAECOAlberta Energy Company
WCSWestern Canadian SelectNYMEXNew York Mercantile Exchange
CDBChristina Dilbit BlendWCSBWestern Canadian Sedimentary Basin
MSWMixed Sweet Blend
HSBHusky Synthetic Blend
WTSWest Texas Sour
51


NETBACK RECONCILIATIONS
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the items comprising Netbacks to Operating Margin found in our interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total Production
Upstream Financial Results
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
Oil Sands (1)
Conventional (1)
Offshore (1)
Total Upstream
Gross Sales5,015 626 427 6,068 
Royalties469 39 25 533 
Purchased Product574 287  861 
Transportation and Blending1,780 19 3 1,802 
Operating592 140 59 791 
Netback1,600 141 340 2,081 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management189 (1) 188 
Operating Margin1,411 142 340 1,893 
Per Interim Consolidated Financial StatementsAdjustmentsBasis of Netback Calculation
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
Total UpstreamCondensateThird-Party Sourced
Internal Consumption (2)
Equity Adjustment (3)
Other (4)
Total
Upstream
Gross Sales6,068 (1,416)(795)(145)50 (82)3,680 
Royalties533 — — — — 538 
Purchased Product861 — (795)— — (66) 
Transportation and Blending1,802 (1,416)— — — — 386 
Operating791 — — (145)(9)644 
Netback2,081    38 (7)2,112 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management188      188 
Operating Margin1,893    38 (7)1,924 
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions) (5)
Oil Sands(1)
Conventional (1)
Offshore (1)
Total Upstream
Gross Sales1,247 182  1,429 
Royalties20 1  21 
Purchased Product166 47  213 
Transportation and Blending632 19  651 
Operating233 83  316 
Netback196 32  228 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management66   66 
Operating Margin130 32  162 
Per Interim Consolidated Financial StatementsAdjustmentsBasis of Netback Calculation
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions) (5)
Total UpstreamCondensateThird-party Sourced
Inventory Write-Down (6)
Internal Consumption (2)
Other (4)
Total
Upstream
Gross Sales1,429 (639)(231)— (65)(13)481 
Royalties21 — — — — 27 
Purchased Product213 — (231)— — 18  
Transportation and Blending651 (639)— 296 — 309 
Operating316 — — 27 (65)(19)259 
Netback228 — — (329)— (13)(114)
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management66      66 
Operating Margin162   (329) (13)(180)
(1)Found in Note 1 of the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Represents natural gas volumes produced by the Conventional segment used for internal consumption by the Oil Sands segment.
(3)Revenues and expenses related to the HCML joint venture are accounted for using the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes.
(4)Other includes construction, transportation and blending and third-party processing margin.
(5)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(6)Realization of prior period inventory write-down in reversals.
52




Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)

Oil
Sands (1)
Conventional (1)
Offshore (1)
Total Upstream
Gross Sales9,790 1,402 858 12,050 
Royalties793 63 50 906 
Purchased Product1,292 668  1,960 
Transportation and Blending3,558 37 7 3,602 
Operating1,177 282 117 1,576 
Netback2,970 352 684 4,006 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management418   418 
Operating Margin2,552 352 684 3,588 
Per Interim Consolidated Financial StatementsAdjustmentsBasis of Netback Calculation
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
Total UpstreamCondensateThird-party Sourced
Internal Consumption (2)
Equity Adjustment (3)
Other (4)
Total
Upstream
Gross Sales12,050 (2,784)(1,848)(294)102 (176)7,050 
Royalties906 — — — 12 — 918 
Purchased Product1,960 — (1,848)— — (112) 
Transportation and Blending3,602 (2,784)— — — — 818 
Operating1,576 — — (294)12 (21)1,273 
Netback4,006 — — — 78 (43)4,041 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management418      418 
Operating Margin3,588    78 (43)3,623 
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions) (5)
Oil
Sands (1)
Conventional (1)
Offshore (1)
Total Upstream
Gross Sales3,681 404  4,085 
Royalties71 4  75 
Purchased Product571 108  679 
Transportation and Blending2,537 42  2,579 
Operating553 167  720 
Netback(51)83  32 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management91   91 
Operating Margin(142)83  (59)
Per Interim Consolidated Financial StatementsAdjustmentsBasis of Netback Calculation
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions) (5)
Total UpstreamCondensateThird-party Sourced
Inventory Write-Down (6)
Internal Consumption (2)
Other(4)
Total
Upstream
Gross Sales4,085 (1,852)(697)— (133)(30)1,373 
Royalties75 — — (1)— — 74 
Purchased Product679 — (697)— — 18  
Transportation and Blending2,579 (1,852)— (5)— — 722 
Operating720 — — — (133)(37)550 
Netback32 — — — (11)27 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management91      91 
Operating Margin(59)  6  (11)(64)
(1)Found in Note 1 of the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Represents natural gas volumes produced by the Conventional segment used for internal consumption by the Oil Sands segment.
(3)Revenues and expenses related to the HCML joint venture are accounted for using the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes.
(4)Other includes construction, transportation and blending and third-party processing margin.
(5)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(6)Netbacks do not reflect non-cash write-downs or reversals of product inventory until it is realized when the product is sold. These amount are net of inventory write-down reversals.
53


Oil Sands
Basis of Netback Calculation
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
Foster CreekChristina Lake
Sunrise
Other Oil Sands (2)
Total Bitumen and Heavy OilNatural Gas and Medium OilTotal Oil sands
Gross Sales860 1,274 156 730 3,020 8 3,028 
Royalties142 242 4 80 468 1 469 
Purchased Product       
Transportation and Blending155 131 43 35 364  364 
Operating154 171 54 203 582 9 591 
Netback409 730 55 412 1,606 (2)1,604 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management189 
Operating Margin1,415 

Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustments
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
Total Oil SandsCondensateThird-party Sourced
Other (3)
Total Oil Sands
Gross Sales3,028 1,416 508 63 5,015 
Royalties469    469 
Purchased Product  508 66 574 
Transportation and Blending364 1,416   1,780 
Operating591   1 592 
Netback1,604   (4)1,600 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management189    189 
Operating Margin1,415   (4)1,411 

Basis of Netback Calculation
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions) (4)
Foster CreekChristina LakeSunrise
Other Oil Sands (2)
Total Bitumen and Heavy OilNatural Gas and Medium OilTotal Oil Sands
Gross Sales222 203   425  425 
Royalties8 18   26  26 
Purchased Product       
Transportation and Blending177 112   289  289 
Operating130 118   248  248 
Netback(93)(45)  (138) (138)
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management66 
Operating Margin(204)

Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustments
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions) (3)
Total Oil SandsCondensateThird-party Sourced
Inventory Write-down (5)
OtherTotal Oil Sands
Gross Sales425 639 182  1 1,247 
Royalties26   (6) 20 
Purchased Product  182  (16)166 
Transportation and Blending289 639  (296) 632 
Operating248   (27)12 233 
Netback(138)  329 5 196 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management66     66 
Operating Margin(204)  329 5 130 
(1)Found in Note 1 of the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes Tucker, Lloydminster Thermal and Lloydminster Cold/EOR assets.
(3)Other includes construction, transportation and blending margin.
(4)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(5)Netbacks do not reflect non-cash write-downs or reversals of product inventory until it is realized when the product is sold. These amount are net of inventory write-down reversals.
54



Basis of Netback Calculation
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
Foster CreekChristina Lake
Sunrise
Other Oil Sands (2)
Total Bitumen and Heavy OilNatural Gas and Medium OilTotal Oil sands
Gross Sales1,712 2,269 274 1,421 5,676 17 5,693 
Royalties249 409 6 128 792 1 793 
Purchased Product       
Transportation and Blending328 261 70 115 774  774 
Operating323 335 85 410 1,153 17 1,170 
Netback812 1,264 113 768 2,957 (1)2,956 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management418 
Operating Margin2,538 
Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustments
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
Total Oil SandsCondensateThird-party Sourced
Other (3)
Total Oil Sands
Gross Sales5,693 2,784 1,180 133 9,790 
Royalties793    793 
Purchased Product  1,180 112 1,292 
Transportation and Blending774 2,784   3,558 
Operating1,170   7 1,177 
Netback2,956   14 2,970 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management418    418 
Operating Margin2,538   14 2,552 
Basis of Netback Calculation
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions)
Foster CreekChristina LakeSunrise
Other Oil Sands (2)
Total Bitumen and Heavy OilNatural Gas and Medium OilTotal Oil sands
Gross Sales639 596   1,235  1,235 
Royalties31 39   70  70 
Purchased Product       
Transportation and Blending398 282   680  680 
Operating273 256   529  529 
Netback(63)19   (44) (44)
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management91 
Operating Margin(135)
Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustments
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions) (3)
Total Oil SandsCondensateThird-party Sourced
Inventory Write-down (5)
OtherTotal Oil Sands
Gross Sales1,235 1,852 587  7 3,681 
Royalties70   1  71 
Purchased Product  587  (16)571 
Transportation and Blending680 1,852  5  2,537 
Operating529    24 553 
Netback(44)  (6)(1)(51)
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management91     91 
Operating Margin(135)  (6)(1)(142)
(1)Found in Note 1 of the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes Tucker, Lloydminster Thermal and Lloydminster cold/EOR assets.
(3)Other includes construction, transportation and blending margin.
(4)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.
(5)Netbacks do not reflect non-cash write-downs or reversals of product inventory until it is realized when the product is sold. These amount are net of inventory write-down reversals.
    

55


Conventional
Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustments
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
ConventionalThird-party Sourced
Other (2)
Conventional
Gross Sales320 287 19 626 
Royalties39   39 
Purchased Product 287  287 
Transportation and Blending19   19 
Operating132  8 140 
Netback130  11 141 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management(1)  (1)
Operating Margin131  11 142 
Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustments
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions)
ConventionalThird-party Sourced
Other (2)
Conventional
Gross Sales121 49 12 182 
Royalties1   1 
Purchased Product 49 (2)47 
Transportation and Blending20  (1)19 
Operating76  7 83 
Netback24  8 32 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management    
Operating Margin24  8 32 
Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustments
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
ConventionalThird-party Sourced
Other (2)
Conventional
Gross Sales691 668 43 1,402 
Royalties63   63 
Purchased Product 668  668 
Transportation and Blending37   37 
Operating268  14 282 
Netback323  29 352 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management    
Operating Margin323  29 352 
Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustments
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020 ($ millions)
ConventionalThird-party Sourced
Other (2)
Conventional
Gross Sales271 110 23 404 
Royalties4   4 
Purchased Product 110 (2)108 
Transportation and Blending42   42 
Operating154  13 167 
Netback71  12 83 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management    
Operating Margin71  12 83 

(1)Found in Note 1 of the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Reflects operating margin from processing facility.
(3)Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current period’s operating segments.


56


Offshore
Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustment
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (2)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
China
Indonesia (1)
AtlanticTotal Offshore
Equity Adjustment (1)
Total Offshore
Gross Sales308 50 119 477 (50)427 
Royalties16 5 9 30 (5)25 
Purchased Product      
Transportation and Blending  3 3  3 
Operating23 8 35 66 (7)59 
Netback269 37 72 378 (38)340 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management   
Operating Margin378 (38)340 


Basis of Netback CalculationAdjustment
Per Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (2)
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 ($ millions)
China
Indonesia (1)
AtlanticTotal Offshore
Equity Adjustment (1)
Total Offshore
Gross Sales629 102 229 960 (102)858 
Royalties33 12 17 62 (12)50 
Purchased Product      
Transportation and Blending  7 7  7 
Operating44 14 71 129 (12)117 
Netback552 76 134 762 (78)684 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Risk Management   
Operating Margin762 (78)684 
(1)Revenues and expenses related to the HCML joint venture are accounted for using the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes.
(2)Found in Note 1 of the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sales Volumes (1)
The following table provides the sales volumes used to calculate Netback:
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Month Ended June 30,
(BOE/d, unless otherwise stated)2021202020212020
Oil Sands
Foster Creek139.0 171.1 156.9 170.2 
Christina Lake235.8 199.0 226.7 213.9 
Sunrise25.0 — 26.9 — 
Other Oil Sands144.2 — 144.1 — 
Total Oil Sands544.0 370.1 554.6 384.0 
Conventional141.3 92.0 138.6 93.8 
Sales before Internal Consumption685.3 462.1 693.2 477.8 
Less: Internal Consumption (2)
(85.0)(55.6)(85.8)(56.6)
Offshore
Asia Pacific - China49.0 — 50.2 — 
Asia Pacific - Indonesia8.8 — 9.1 — 
Atlantic15.2 — 15.1 — 
Total Offshore73.0 — 74.4 — 
Total Sales673.3 406.5 681.8 421.2 

(1)Presented on dry bitumen basis.
(2)Less natural gas volumes used for internal consumption by the Oil Sands segment.



57